/
s.
0
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Air/Superfund
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-450/1-91-003
June 1991
vvEPA
AIR / SUPERFUND
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES
Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects
Technical Note
-------
EPA 450/1-91-003
AIR/SUPERFUND NATIONAL TECHNICAL
GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES
Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects
Prepared by:
Bart Eklund
Constance Petrinec
David Ranum
Lowell Howlett
RADIAN CORPORATION
Austin, TX 78720
Contract Number 68-02-4392
Prepared for:
Mr. James F. Durham
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
June, 1991
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved
for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Project (Task) Objectives 1
1.3 Approach 2
1.4 Organization of Technical Note 3
2.0 DATABASE STRUCTURE AND CONTENT 4
2.1 Description of Database 4
2.2 Description of Source Types 7
2.3 Emission Rate Measurement Approaches 10
3.0 MEASURED EMISSION RATE DATA 14
3.1 List of Studies 14
3.2 Summary of Emission Rate Data 14
4.0 METHODS COMPARISON AND EVALUATION 26
4.1 Methods Comparison 26
4.2 Results of Sensitivity Analysis ; 26
5.0 REFERENCES 33
APPENDIX A: DATABASE OF EMISSION FLUX AND
EMISSION RATE MEASUREMENT DATA
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1 Database Format
LIST OF TABLES
3-1 Studies Contained in the Emission Rate Database 15
3-2 Key to Compounds 2,3, and 4 for Each Study in Database 16
3-3 Summary of Flux Chamber Data 19
3-4 Summary of Source Concentration Data 21
3-5 Summary of Flux Chamber TNMHC Staticis and Variability 24
4-1 Comparison of Data for Various Emission Measurement Methods ... 27
4-2 Correlations for Flux Chamber Data in («g/m2-min) 29
u
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air Program Office (Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards) and the Regional Air Offices have been given the
responsibility to evaluate air impacts from Superfund sites and to advise Superfund
Regional Offices on appropriate clean-up actions. The Air/Superfund Coordination
Program, under the direction of the EPA Air Program Office, was begun to facilitate this
effort. One part of this program is the analysis of baseline air emissions from various
types of sites, including uncontrolled landfills, lagoons, and sites with abandoned drums.
Work to estimate baseline emissions from Superfund sites has already been done
under the Air/Superfund Coordination Program, including a manual summarizing
estimation techniques for emissions at abandoned hazardous waste sites - Volume II of
the National Technical Guidance Series (NTGS). This manual (1) generally provides
sampling and modeling approaches for measuring emissions at specific sites. Only very
limited data is provided in Volume II on the typical levels of emissions encountered at
hazardous waste sites.
The U.S. EPA recognizes the need for a compilation of emission rate data and
sponsored the study described in this document under Work Assignment 64 of EPA
Contract No. 68-02-4392.
12 PROJECT (TASK) OBJECTIVES
Compilation .and evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission rate
data was performed. The three primary objectives were to:
-------
• Determine typical averages and ranges of emissions for various types of
sources (e.g. surface impoundments, landfarms, wastewater treatment
lagoons);
• Determine the degree of correlation between emission rate results from
different sampling methods; and
• Perform a sensitivity analysis to examine the effects of different variables
on measured emission rates or fluxes.
13 APPROACH
The study was limited to emission rate studies already in Radian's files. A list of
applicable studies was developed and final reports for each study were obtained. Each
report was examined for information pertaining to the following categories:
Site Type;
Site Characteristics;
Waste Characteristics;
Meteorological Conditions;
Sampling Methods; and
Sampling Technique Parameters.
Total non-methane hydrocarbon (TNMHC) and benzene emission rate or flux
data were copied from each report along with any source concentration data (e.g.
benzene concentration in soil or wastewater). In most of the reports, emission data were
reported for a project-specific list of target compounds. For such cases, emission and
source concentration data for three organic compounds (other than benzene) were
selected for inclusion in the database. The compounds selected were those having the
highest average emission rates or fluxes. These compounds were identified in the
database as Compound 2, Compound 3, and Compound 4 in descending order of
emissions and their identities were recorded.
In any report, a single source might have been divided into many grids for
purposes of making a series of emission flux measurements. The selection of
-------
Compounds 2, 3, and 4 remained the same across ail the grids of that single source (i.e.
the selection criteria was based on the average emission rate for the entire source and
not the emission flux .at any singe measurement point). For sites where emission rates
were measured using multiple sampling techniques (e.g. transect method and flux
chamber method for the same source), the same Compounds 2, 3, and 4 were used for
each method when entering emission data and point source concentrations into the
database. This enabled a broader base for comparison of two different measurement
techniques.
Conversions of reported data were necessary in some cases to get all emission
rate/flux data in the same units. These calculations were recorded in a project notebook
along with comments and other points of clarification. The project notebook also was
used to record information regarding when and where averages of data points were used,
how point source concentration data were matched to emission data, and in some .
instances the rationale for not including certain data points in the database.
To supplement the comments in the project notebook, pertinent pages of actual
reports were photocopied, labeled with the project number and name, and highlighted to
show information utilized in the database. These packets were kept as an additional
reference for the database.
1.4 ORGANIZATION OF TECHNICAL NOTE
The remainder of this technical note is divided into four sections. Section 2
presents a description of the database. Tabulated emission rates are contained in
Section 3. A brief comparison of emission rate measurement methods and the results of
a sensitivity analysis to look at the effect of key variables on emission fluxes are given in
Section 4. References are given in Section 5. A hardcopy of the complete database is
included as an appendix to this document.
-------
SECTION 2
DATABASE STRUCTURE AND CONTENT
This section presents descriptions of the database format, the different types of
emission sources, and the various sampling approaches used for measuring emission
rates.
2.1 DESCRIPTION OF DATABASE
•
Data from each report was entered into a seperate spreadsheet using Lotus 123
software. The spreadsheets had the general headings shown in Figure 2-1.
The "Source Type" column shown in Figure 2-1 utilizes a numerical code to define
the nature of the waste/site generating the emissions. Thirteen different source types
were distinguished based on identifying physical or operating characteristics. The source
types are further defined in Section 2.2.
The "Sample Technique" column describes the method used to obtain the
emission data. Abbreviations were used to identify the various measurement techniques:
Abbreviation
F/C
DHF/C
Transect
Vent
C-P
Impinger
PUF Plug
Sampling Technique
Emission isolation flux chamber
Downhole emission flux chamber
Transect technique
Vent sampling technique
Concentration-profile technique
Collection medium for the F/C
Collection medium for the F/C
These techniques are described in Section 2.3.
-------
PROJECT « TITLE OF PROJECT
i
Month-Year of sampling
Sampling Technique Used (i.e. Flux Chamber)
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or ng/L)
Source Sample Sample Sample
Type Tech. Are* Point TMMHC Benzene Cwpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Dnpnd 4 TMMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
TEMPERATURES (C) Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface (mph) (X) (L/«in) (m2> (hour*)
Figure 2-1. Database Format.
-------
The "Sample Area" section contains a very brief, shorthand descriptor of the
location where the emission measurement was performed. They may refer to a specific
source at a given site (e.g. lagoon #4) or to a specific portion of a given source (e.g. cell
#2 of landfill). These descriptors were included to assist in identification of the table or
text in the original report that contains the pertinent emission data.
The "Sample Point" column generally provides a means for distinguishing different
sampling locations within a given sampling area. In some cases for flux chamber data,
the sample point refers to the chronological order in which a large series of replicate
measurements were made at a single point. For transect data, the sample point typically
refers to the location of the sampler within the transect array for a given sampling
episode. The numbering system for sample point allows for ease of data manipulation
when comparing different-measurement techniques within one waste site.
The "Emission Rates" columns contain emission rates for total non-methane
hydrocarbons (TNMHC), benzene and the additional organic species designated
Compound 2, Compound 3, and Compound 4. In reports where the measurement
technique was the emission isolation flux chamber, the emission rate would be more
accurately called a flux measurement. A flux is defined as the mass of emissions per
area per time while a rate is defined as the mass of emissions per time. In the database,
a value with emission rate units (mass/time) generally represents emissions from the
entire source, while a value with emission flux units (mass/area-time) represents
emissions from a specified area that is usually limited to the specific area being sampled
(e.g. the 0.13 m2 enclosed by the flux chamber). Flux data was always reported in units
of ug/m2-min. For transect and vent sampling measurements, the emission rates were
reported in units of ug/min, which can be converted to flux units by dividing the
emission rate by the emitting area (m2).
-------
Point source concentrations are given in the next set of columns for TNMHC,
benzene and Compounds 2, 3, and 4. Concentrations are given as either ppmw liquid
(mg/L) or ppmw solids (ug/g).
The remaining columns in the spreadsheet contain meteorological and process
data. Meteorological conditions during testing of interest are ambient air temperature
(C), wind speed or WS (mph), and percent cloud coverage during measurement
activities. Process data relating specifically to emission isolation flux chamber usage
*
include the temperature of the flux chamber sweep air (F/C Air) hi degrees Celsius and
the flow rate of the sweep air within the chamber (L/min). Parameters describing the
waste site itself include bulk and surface temperatures, the area, volume and depth of
contaminated material, soil type, bulk density, soil density, soil moisture (weight percent),
specific gravity, and retention time of the waste at the site.
DESCRIPTION OF SOURCE TYPES
Thirteen distinct source types were used to categorize the emission rate data. The
defining characteristics of each of the source types are briefly described below. The code
number for each source type is also shown.
1 - Surface Impoundment
A contained, defined pond or lagoon where liquid waste is placed for storage.
The liquid surface is exposed to the atmosphere and no mechanical or chemical
treatment of the waste occurs.
2 - Spill Site
An area of land where an uncontrolled, unanticipated release of liquid hazardous
substances or hazardous waste has occured and the surface layers of soil are
contamianted. The. site typically has undergone some type of clean-up of the material
that was spilled soon after the release.
-------
A designated-area in a RCRA-permitted transfer, storage, and disposal facility
(TSDF) into which known quantities of defined substances have been placed for disposal.
The quantity and types of wastes accepted are known. Wastes are typically segregated by
type and placed in lifts (layers) in lined and bermed areas. Soil or fill layers are typically
placed over each successive lift to further isolate the waste.
4 - Uncontrolled Landfill
*
An area of land where organic wastes have been placed for disposal. These are
not RCRA-permitted facilities and the quantity and types of wastes placed in the landfill
are not documented or regulated. The design and operation of the landfill may not
follow any accepted engineering practices.
5 - Test Soil Pile
Piles or layers of soil spiked with known qualities of organic compounds (e.g.
gasoline) and used in a controlled experimental setting. The volume of the piles and
the test conditions are defined by the parameters of the experiment.
6 - Aerobic Wastewater Treatment Systems
Surface impoundments or tanks where wastewater is temporarily stored to allow
oxygen-using microbes to degrade the organic components of the wastewater. Oxygen is
typically added to the systems to promote degradation. The oxygen may be transferred
to the system via surface, mechanical mixers or by introducing compressed air through a
subsurface network of pipes and openings.
7 - Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Lagoons
Surface impoundments in which liquid waste is temporarily stored to allow non-
oxygen-using microbes to degrade the organic components of the wastewater.
Volatilization is a competing pathway for VOCs in such systems, and may be responsible
for a large fraction of the VOC losses from the wastewater.
8
-------
8 - Subsurface Leaks
An area of land where the subsurface soil and/or groundwater is contaminated by
leaks from underground storage tanks or pipelines.
9 -
A controlled landfill (see #3) that has been filled to capacity with waste and has
been covered by a polymer liner and/or compacted soil. Emission measurements may
have been performed from the surface of the covered landfill or from standpipes present
in the landfill to vent carbon dioxide and methane generated by decomposition of the
waste.
10 - Chemical Production Unit
Any type of chemical production or manufacturing process unit operating under
defined process parameters. Typically input and output materials of the process can be
defined and quantified to help predict emissions.
11 - Drum Storage Area
An area designated for the storage of 55-gallon drums used as containment units
for solvents or organic wastes. The drum storage area can be indoors or out (i.e.
exposed to varying degrees of temperature change, sun exposure). The one indoor drum
storage area included in the database had emissions from the drums exhausted from the
building through a fan/vent system.
12 - Landfarm
An area of land where liquid refinery wastes are applied to the land surface and
periodically tilled. The intent of the treatment is for the organic constituents of the
waste to be ultimately degraded by biological and chemical processes or attenuated by
the soil matrix. Volatilization is a competing pathway for VOCs and some semi-volatile
compounds. The tilling of the landfarm or landtreatment unit typically enhances the
volatilization rate of the volatile components present in the waste.
-------
13 - Mining Operation
An area of land where mining activities such as crushing, conveying, excavation,
and storage of mined materials takes place. The one mining operation site included in
the database handled material (e.g. sand, shale) containing large amounts of organic
compounds.
Significant overlap between certain source types was noted when compiling the
database. Surface impoundments and anaeorbic wastewater treatment systems (source
types 1 and 7) were difficult to distinguish, as were spill sites and subsurface leaks
(source types 2 and 8). The data for these source type pairs were lumped together.
2.3 EMISSION RATE MEASUREMENT APPROACHES
The database contains emission rate data obtained from both direct and indirect
methods of measurement. More detailed discussions of each sampling method are given
in Volume II (1) along with schematic diagrams and primary references for the
development and evaluation of each method.
23.1 Emission Isolation Flux Chamber
The emission isolation flux chamber (flux chamber) is an enclosure used to make
direct emission flux measurements. The flux chamber isolates a defined area of the
emitting surface (either liquid or solid) and captures any gas emissions. The typical flux
chamber used has an internal volume of 0.030 m3 (30 1) and isolates an area of 0.13 m2.
Clean, dry sweep air is introduced into the flux chamber at a controlled rate. The shape
and size of the chamber as well as the rate of sweep air flow determines the residence
time of gases within the flux chamber. The ratio of volume and flow rate (V/Q) is the
theoretical residence time. Typically three to five residence times are required to
establish steady state conditions in the chamber before sampling should begin. The
standard flow rate of sweep air is 5 L/min, so steady state conditions can be achieved in
10
-------
18 to 30 minutes. The sweep air flow rate through the chamber is recorded during
sampling and the concentration of species present is measured at the outlet of the flux
chamber.
Air samples are typically collected in one of three ways. One, a portable
hydrocarbon analyzer with an internal pump can be used. Two, gas-tight syringes can be
used to collect samples for on-site analysis. Three, evacuated canisters can be used to
collect samples for off-site analysis. Alternate sample collection media can be attached
to the flux chamber manifold. An impinger train such as one containing 0.1 N sulfuric
acid solution can be attached for the collection of amine samples. A PUF (polyurethane
foam) sampler can also be attached to collect semi-volatile organic samples.
The emission flux is calculated using the following equation:
where: EFj = emission flux of species i (ug/m2-min);
Cj = measured concentration of species i (ug/m3);
Q = sweep air flow rate (m3/min); and
A = exposed surface area (m2).
A series of emission flux measurements can be used to derive an overall emission rate
for a given source.
2.3.2 Downhole Emissions Isolation Flux Chamber
The downhole emissions isolation flux chamber (downhole flux chamber) is
used to directly measure volatile emissions from subsurface soils. The downhole flux
chamber is similar to the flux chamber described above except that it is designed to be
used in the annular "space of a hollow-stem auger during drilling activities. Emissions are
collected from an area of soil defined by the volume of the hollow-stem auger at a
11
-------
selected depth below the surface. The emissions enter the chamber from the exposed
soil and are mixed with the clean, dry sweep air being added to the chamber at a
measured rate. The vapor/air mixture is then drawn through the exit port on the
chamber for either sampling or measurement of vapor concentration. The emission flux
is calculated using the same equation provided for the emission isolation flux chamber,
but the effective surface area of emitting material can not be determined. The method
is typically used to estimate air emissions from the subsurface if it were to be excavated
and exposed to the atmosphere.
2.3.3 Vent Sampling
Vent sampling is a measurement method that can be applied for sites with
stacks or vents. It requires values for the emission concentration and the volumetric flow
rate. The volumetric flow rate can be calculated from measurements of the exhaust
velocity and cross-sectional area of the vent. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Title 40 Part 60 provides a procedure for obtaining flow rates for vents and ducts by
outlining appropriate sampling locations and methods for determining exhaust velocity.
The emission rate for a vent is calculated using the following equation:
ER; =(C;)(U)(A)
where: ERj = emission rate of species i (ug/sec);
Q = concentration of species i (ug/m3);
U = gas velocity through vent (m/sec); and
A = cross-sectional area of vent (m2).
2.3.4 Concentration Profile
The concentration-profile (C-P) method is an indirect measurement method
where ambient air samples are collected under specified meteorological conditions and a
12
-------
dispersion model is used to fit the data and derive an emission rate for the emission
source of interest. The C-P method has been tested under field site conditions and has
been demonstrated to generate valid results. The concentration of the species of interest
is measured at logarithmically spaced heights at a downwind position on the anticipated
centerline of the emission plume. Measurements of wind velocity, volatiles concentration
and temperature profiles above the waste source are used to estimate the vertical flux of
the emitted species. The C-P technique requires that wind speed and direction match
the conditions preselected for the sampling location. The equation used to calculate an
emission rate for this method is relatively complex (2), and certain terms in the equation
(e.g., atmospheric stability correction factor) must be estimated.
2.3.5 Transect Technique
The transect technique employs vertical and horizontal arrangements of
samplers set up within the effective cross-section of the emission plume to measure the
concentrations of species present. This data is combined with a dispersion model to
derive an emission rate for the emission source of interest. The modeling approach used
is a basic gaussian plume model equation for a ground-level, non-buoyant point source.
The cross-sectional area of the plume is determined from o and oz and multiplied by
the wind speed to determine the mass of contaminants moving through a given cross-
section of the plume over time, i.e. the emission rate at the source. The equation used
to calculate an emission rate for this method is relatively complex (2). The accuracy of
this approach is limited by the accuracy of the measurement data and the validity of the
•
assumption that the downwind concentrations of each compound vary according to a
Gaussian distribution.
13
-------
SECTION 3
MEASURED EMISSION RATE DATA
This section presents summary tables of the emission rate/flux data compiled
in this study.
3.1 LIST OF STUDIES
Over 50 projects were identified as studies likely to have applicable emission
rate data and included in a preliminary list of studies. Each study was assigned a
sequential integer for identification purposes. After examination of the reported data, a
subset of these studies were found to have data that met the objectives of this study. A
listing of the 33 studies included in the database is given in Table 3-1. The specific
names and locations are not given for the sites to avoid violating confidentiality
agreements. Note that the study numbers are not consecutive.
The list of studies is not intended to be all inclusive. No systematic literature
search was included in this study.
32 SUMMARY OF EMISSION RATE DATA
As previously noted, a spreadsheet was prepared for each site following the
format shown in Figure 2-1. These spreadsheets may be found in Appendix A. The
identities of Compounds 2, 3, and 4 for each study are given in Table 3-2.
14
-------
TABLE 3-1. STUDIES CONTAINED IN THE EMISSION RATE DATABASE
Study
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
33
36
37
45
4SA
49
51
Proj*ct ID
242-079-01-01
203-080-64
207-092-04
203-080-64
256-042-04
204-1*5
203-070-15
203-068-119
274-003
203-023-73
203-024-42
203-024-42
203-024-18
203-001-63
244-035-15
???
222-078-17
240-016-32
240-016-32
203-001-63
203-001-63
203-001-63
203-001-63
211-062-07
242-068-06-01
259-059-05-01
293-037-00
239-024
239-025
243-050-04-01
243-050-04-01
239-029-03-01
211-036-04-25
Client
EPA
EPA
EPA
USAF
*****
*****
EPA
*****
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
*****
CA DBS
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
EPA
Sit*
Nam*/ID
Sit* B
Annex
Sit* A
Hill AFB
T*st Call*
*****
Plant A3
*****
Plant Al
*****
Tast Call
last Call
*****
*****
Purity
Sita 9??
*****
*****
Sit* 2
Sita 4
Sita 5
Sita 6
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
FB and TB
Data of
2/90
10/89
8-9/89
8/89
5/89
1-3/89
10/87
4/88
6/87
9/86
11/85
11/85
9/85
9-11/84
7/83
6-9/84
6/84
4/84
1/84
11/83
11/83
9-11/83
10/83
3-10/82
4/89
11/88
12/89
7/89
7-8/89
11/87
11/87
8/89
4/82
Geographical
Gulf Coast
Bar stow, CA
San Padro, CA
Midwest
Utah
Radian-Austin
Gulf Coast
Eastern U.S.
Gulf Coast
Eastern U.S.
Gulf Coast
Radian-Austin
Radian- Austin
Wast Coast
Hast Coast
Fresno , CA
Mast Coast
Hast Coast
Gulf Coast
Gulf Coast
Eastern U.S.
Eastern U.S.
Eastern U.S.
Hast Coast
Gulf Coast
Rockies
Hast Coast
Hast Coast
Hast Coast
Hast Coast
Hast Coast
Heat Coast
Gulf Coast
Typ* of
Surface Impoundment
Spill Sit*
Spill Site/Terminal Uncontrolled
Landfill
Uncontrolled Landfill
Spill/Leak Sita
Tast Soil Pile
Chemical Production Unit
Aerobic Haatewatar Treatment System
Surface Impoundment
Aerobic Hastewater Treatment System
Surface Impoundment
Surface Impoundment
Test Soil Pile
Landtraatment Area
Uncontrolled Landfill
Uncontrolled Landfill
Controlled Landfill,
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Spill Site
Landfarm, Controlled Landfill
Controlled Landfill,
Covered Landfill
Surface Impoundment, Controlled
Landfill, Covered Landfill,
Drum Storage
Surface Impoundment
Uncontrolled Landfill
Surface Impoundment
Surface Impoundment,
Uncontrolled Landfill
Uncontrolled Landfill
Refinery Unit
Aerobic Haatawatar Treatment System
Mining Operation
Mining Operation
Controlled Landfill
Aerobic & Anaerobic Hastewater
Treatment System
15
-------
TABLE 3-2. KEY TO COMPOUNDS 2, 3, AND 4 FOR EACH STUDY
IN DATABASE
Sit*
No.
.1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
23
Sanpla
Location
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 5
Transact Run 2
Transact Run 3
Transact Run 4
Transact Run 5
Transact Run 1
Transact Run 2
Transact Run 4
Inact. Landf.
Activa araa 1
Activa axaa 2
Surf. Imp. Rl
Surf. lop. R2
Landtraatmant
Landfarm
Activa Landf.
Landf . /transact
Compound 42
mathanol
mathanoL
N-propylbanzana
trichlorofluoromathana
trichlorofluoromathana
M-.P-zylanaa
chlorobanzana
total xylanas
total zylanas
total zylanas
trichloroathylana
toluana
mathylana chlorida
H-nonana
mathylana chlorida
acataldahyda
toluana
toluana
toluana
toluana
S02
toluana
oathylana chlorida
1,1, 1-trichloroathana
1,1, 1-trichloroathana
1,1, 1-trichloroathana
1, 1, 1-trichloroathana
toluana
toluana
N-dacana
total haloganatad BC
Compound f 3
toluana
toluana
0-zylana
1,1, 1-trichloroathana
0-zylana
0-zylana
trichloroathylana
athylbanzana
athylbanzana
athylbanzana
toluana
total zylanas
chlorobenzena
H-dacana
chloroathana
toluana
chloromathana
hazana
M,-P-zylenes
athylbanzena
1,1, 1-trichloroathana
tatrachloroathylana
tatrachloroathylana
mathylana chlorida
mathylana chlorida
mathylcyclohazana
M- , F-zylanas
B-pinana
paraffins
Compound #4
styrana
acatona
0-zylana
M- , P-zylanas
tatrachloroathylana
tatrachloroathylana
athylbanzana
N-octana
vinyl chlorida
C-2 VOC
N-hazana
mathylcyclohazana
trichloroathylana
tatrachloroathylana
M- , F-zylanas
mathylana chlorida
tatrachloroathylena
toluana
M- , F-zylanas
H-dacana
N-nonana
acrylonitrila
16
-------
TABLE 3-2. (Continued)
Sita
24
25
26
27
Sanpla
Location
Rad. Lagoon 1
Oxid. Lagoon 2
Hold Pond 6/CP
Drum Storaga
Landf. 10/flam.
Landf. 10/tox.
Hold Pond 6/FC
Landf. 10/org.
Landf. 10/flam.
Vant Sampling
Compound #2
paraffins
paraffins
paraffins
toluana
paraffins
toluana
toluana
toluana
paraffins
paraffins
paraffins
paraffins
SO2
CoiBDOuno *3
olafins
olafins
M- , P-xylanas
olafins
M- , P-xylanas
trichloroathylana &
bromodi chloromathana
M- , P-xylanaa
olafina
olafins
olafins
toluana
.
trichloroathylana &
bromodi chloromathana
athylbanzana
M-,P-xylenaa
trichloroathylana &
bromodi chloromathana
1, 1, 1-trichloroathana
28
29 Amina Rasulta
Pufplug Raaults
Pond A
North Araa
South Araa
33
51
FB Sita
IB Sita
la
l-chloro-4-
thiobanzana
Cll H22
haxachlorobutadi ana
haxachlorobutadi ana
athylbanzana
diathyl athar
acatona
C9 alkana
athylamina
aldrin
parfluorohaptana
dimathyldisulfida
toluana
total xylanas
indana
cyclohaxana
acatona
mathylaoina
1,1-oxybisbanzana
haxachlorobi cyclohaptadi•
CIO H22 bicyclo HC
dimathyldiaulfida
toluana
styrana
17
-------
In most of the studies examined, the flux chamber method was the only method
used to obtain emission rate or flux data. Typically, a series of emission flux (mass/area-
time) measurements were made at various locations on a given source and these values
were then used to derive an overall emission rate (mass/time) for the source. The flux
chamber data is summarized in two tables in this section, while emission data obtained
using other sampling approaches are presented in Section 4.
The flux chamber data are summarized in Table 3-3 with the data grouped by
source type (source types 1 and 8 are combined since surface impoundments and
anaerobic wastewater treatment lagoons were found to be equivalent). The table shows
the number of observations, the size of the emitting area, and the average emission flux
for each major compound of interest for each emission source. In all cases, the fluxes
shown in Table 3-3 are mean values. An overall emission rate (in units of ug/min) can
be determined for any source by multiplying the mean flux shown by the emitting area.
For some sites, a given emission source has multiple zones of equivalent emissions. In
such cases, data for each zone are shown in Table 3-3.
Certain source types are better represented in Table 3-3 than others (i.e. have
more data points). Surface impoundments, spill sites, controlled (RCRA) landfills and
uncontrolled landfills (source types 1,2,3,4) have more data available for comparison
than do test soil piles, aerobic wastewater treatment systems, landtreatment units, or
mining operations (souces types 5,6,12,13).
Within any one source type, wide ranges of emission fluxes between the highest
and lowest reported values can be seen, particularly for TNMHC emissions. Emission
fluxes for compounds #2, #3, and #4 cannot be compared since the identity of each
compound differed among the various source types and studies.
For comparison to the emission fluxes shown in Table 3-3, the concentrations of
the species of interest in the soil or liquid are shown in Table 3-4.
18
-------
TABLE 3-3. SUMMARY OF FLUX CHAMBER DATA
Study
Number
1
1
10
13
1* •
19
25
25
28
29
5
5
5
5
20
20
20
20
21
19
19
23
24
25
25
49
Source Types :
Maximum
Source Number of
Type Observations*
8
8
1
1
1
1
8
B
8
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
8
5
9
30
2
4
2
3
1
12
4
1
1
1
12
52
1
11
1
2
2
1
1
2
30
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
Size of
Emitting Area
(m«)
15,100
121,000
21,100
3,750
2.30
6,270
1,130
4,910
258,000
17,200
.
4,180
4,180
13.4
4,180
29.7
2,370
1,490
186
3,900
2,090
4,180
0.13
8
9
10
11
12
Aerobic Uastewater Treatment System 13
Emission Flux (uK/m'-mln)
TNMHC Benzene
235,000 118,000
15,500 8,130
2,620,000
5,950 3,840
.
11,200 7.15
346
31.8
0.20 0.01
•
24.9
45.2
9.80
74.5
1.10
2.08
744
0.44
4.43
45.1 0.15
2,420 0.75
9.35 0.64
47.0
54.3
707
40,000
- Subsurface Leak
- Covered Landfill
- Chemical Production Unit
- Drum Storage Area
™ Landtreatment Unit
• Mining Operation
Compound
f 2
26,500
2,440
1,210,000
1,420
22,900
2,160
39.6
4.46
483
240
19.3
1.21
0.27
0.06
8.30
1,050
0.12
11.30
7.19
31.8
Compound
1 3
16,600
1,100
771,000
60.5
1,400
3.96
9.87
0.01
120
1.04
3.11
0.46
5.03
.
4.30
404
0.04
7.63
2.84
9.58
Compound
* 4
6,650
313
469,000
50.0
399
2.04
0.01
25.0
2.74
'
2.10
300
0.03
(Continued)
Anaerobic Uastewater Treatmetn System
-------
TABLE 3-3. (Continued)
ts>
O
Study
Number
3
1 7
i. /
18
18
18
27
29
29
33
2
4
7
7
7
IS
9
11
37
16
16
16
23
45
45A
4SA
* The number
Source Types
Maximum Sice of
Source Number of Knitting Area
Type Observations (of)
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
10
9
6
6
3
20
1
2
8
2
2
9
14
9
64
18
1
5
25
23
25
3
45
18
28
of observations per compound may vary
: 1
•2
3
4
5
6
7
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
1,460
0.13
182
•
•
15
8.4
8.0
8.0
8.0
2.30
1,050
161
9,870
421
421
421
557
, since each
8
9
10
11
12
Aerobic Uastewater Treatment System 13
Anaerobic Wastewater Treatmetn
System
Emission Rate ..(fla/m'-mln)
TNMBC Benzene Compound
» 2
2,150 2.26
25.7 57.0
107,000
739
25,100
205
0.63
36.0
1,370 1.00
255
2,210
56.8 2,600
245 9,630
32.8 1,160
2,120 3.34
138
2,550
2.330
316
2,710
2,990 99.5
16,700
3.52 E10
7.48 E9
compound was not necessarily
Subsurface Leak
Covered Landfill
Chemical Production Unit
Drum Storage Area
Landtreatment Unit
Mining Operation
2,090
Compound Compound
* 3 f 4
548
0.75
94,400
48.0
97,600
181
410
4,800
36.4
3.2
618
9,940
37,500
6,770
71,600
123
66.0
122
2.47
189
234
detected
32.0
113
15.9
0.16
110
6,560 1,
21,900 5,
5,440 1,
339,000
105
34.7
98.9
3.66
146
175
•
during sampling
335
'
'
30.0
95.0
0.47
0.39
680
990
350
94.5
12.7
82.6
2.50
122
107
'
•
event .
-------
TABLE 3-4. SUMMARY OF SOURCE CONCENTRATION DATA
Study
Number
1
1
10
13
1* •
19
25
25
28
29
5
5
5
5
20
20
20
20
21
19
19
23
24
25
25
49
Source Types :
Maximum
Site of
Source Number of Emitting Area
Type Observations* (m»)
8
8
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
• 3
3
1 -
2 •
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
10
9
0
5
1
2
2
2
3
1
12
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
1
2
0
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
Aerobic Wastewater Treatment
15,100
121,000
21,100
3,750
2.3
6,270
1,130
4,910
258,000
17,200
4,180
4,180
13.4
4,180
29.7
2,370
1,490
186
3,900
2,090
4,180
0.13
8
9
10
11
12
System 13
Average Concentration (UC/K or on/L)
TNMHC Benzene Compound Compound Compound
* 2 f 3 * 4
60,000 . 10,000 8,100
4,100 . 720 2,500
• •
75.4 17.0 2.63 0.030 ',
88 . .
278 0.29 26.0 11 5.3
0.397 . 0.0203 0.0125
0.176 . 0.030 0.031 0.028
0.319 0.0176 313 0.0140 0.0121
1.2 0.23 0.065
•
•
•
.
. .
.
7.7 . . !
1,480 . ...
21,800 13.7 2,550 0.68
2.07 0.028 0.065 0.003 0.045
*
29.1 . 2.38 15.84
118 . 19.4 41.1
.
(Continued)
Subsurface Leak
Covered Landfill
Chemical Production Unit
Drum Storage Area
Landtreatment Unit
Mining Operation
Anaerobic Wastewater Treatmetn System
-------
TABLE 3-4. (Continued)
Study
Number
3
17
18
18
18
27
29
29
33
2
4
7
7
7
15
9
11
37
16
16
16
23
45
45A
45A
* Th« number
Source Types
Sou
Ty
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
of obs
: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
M&JllfDUIB
rce Number of
>• Observations
9
0
4
4
2
4
1
2 .
0
2
2
9
10
9
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
ervatlons per compound may
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
Aerobic Uastewater Treatme
Anaerobic Uastewater Treati
Size of
Emitting Area
(»')
1,460
182
.
•
15
8.4
8.0
8.0
8.0
2.3
1,050
161
9,870
421
421
421
557
vary, since each
8
9
10
11
12
nt System 13
netn System
Average
TNMHC Benzene
•
0.35
0.38
0.36
0.00
0.36
.
39
341
42.2
•
5,710 450
138
5,980 97.8
13.1 0.05
•
compound was not necessai
Subsurface Leak
Covered Landfill
Chemical Production Unit
Drum Storage Area
Landtreatment Unit
Mining Operation
Concentration
Compound
f 2
231
5.2
7.0
4.3
8,100
6 0.68
8.2
0.15
8.3
400
301
425
91.3
130
66.0
138
0.15
-lly detected
UK/K or mg/L)
Compound Compound
f 3 * 4
164 204
3.4 2.8
5.9 9.0
2.5 1.7
0.25 0.17
1.1 0.56
B
2.0
802 160
647 122
901 172
754
130 73
34.7 12.7
200 71.7
0.55 0.26
during sampling event.
-------
The Total Non-Methane Hydrocarbon (TNMHC) flux data for each site was
examined to determine the variability in the emission flux within a given source. These
data are summarized in Table 3-5. The mean, minimum, and maximum emission flux
values for each source are shown along with the standard deviation and spatial variability
for the TNMHC emission flux. Precision data are shown that are based on replicate
measurements made at a single location, with the second measurement being performed
immediately after the first. Temporal variability data are also shown that are based on
replicate measurements made at a single location over the duration of the measurements
at that source (usually 1-2 days).
In comparing the flux chamber variability data for TNMHC emission fluxes, very
few temporal variability values are available. Spatial variability is shown to be large
(large coefficient of variability) for all types of sources, even between sites within the
same study. Among the studies included in the database, the spill sites (source type 2)
and the test soil piles (source type 5) exhibited the smallest average standard deviations.
Uncontrolled landfills and mining operations show exceptionally poor average standard
deviation values, indicating that these sources were highly non-homogenous. No overall
relationship between the number of observations and average standard deviation among
the source types examined is seen.
23
-------
TABLE 3-5. SUMMARY OF FLUX CHAMBER TNMHC STATISTICS AND VARIABILITY
Study
Dumber
1
1
13
14
19
20
25
25
28
29
20
20
20
20
21
5
5
5
5
19
19
23
24
25
25
49
3
17
18
Source
Source
Type
8-
8
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Types: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
No. of
Observation*
9
8
9
0
2
5
4
2
3
0
1
12
• 52
1
11
12
4
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
30
10
9
6
TMHHC Emission Flux (ug/m'-mln) Precision
Mean
235,000
15,500
5,950
11,200
2,620,000
346
31.8
0.20
1.10
2.08
744
0.44
4.43
24.9
45.2
9.80
74.5
45.1
2,420
9.35
47.0
54.3
707
40,000
2,150
25.7
107,000
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
Aerobic Wastewater Treatment
Minimum
184,000
8,440
944
4,740
237,000 7
91.5
26.4
0.06
1.10
1.10
151
0.44
0.90
3.9-7
6.88
9.80
74.5
45.1
846
7.69
47.0
54.3
154
520
5.61
1.80
1,240
a
9
10
11
12
System 13
Maximum Std. Dev. No. of C.V.
Obs. (X)
315,000 35,700 2 9.66
27,000 4,860 2 11.3
19,200 5,380
17,700 9,180 ! !
,110,000 2,890,000 2 10.9
600 264
37.2 7.64
0.28 0.12
1.10
6.39 1.31 6 62.3
6100 970
0.44
15.7 5.30 3 104
109 26.4 2 30.8
1*9 69.3 2 11.5
9.80
74.5
45.1
3,990 2,220
11.0 2.34
47.0
54.3
1,260 782
169,000 45,300
13,100 3,160 6 106
120 37.9
471,000 1,180,000
Subsurface Leak
Covered Landfill
Chemical Production Unit
Drum Storage Area
L»nd treatment Unit
Mining Operation
Temporal Spatial
Variability Variability
No. of C.V. No. of
Obs. (X) Obs.
2 28.0 9
2 14.3 8
5
2
5
4
2
3
12
52
3 103 11
12
4
.
2
2
2
30
10
9
6
C.V.
(X)
15.2
31.4
91.2
•1.7
110
76 *
1 D . J
24.0
59.4
62.8
130
135
106
153
91.9
25.0
111
114
147
147
169
(Continued)
Anaerobic Uastewater Treatmetn System
-------
TABLE 3-5. (Continued)
N)
Study
Number
18
18
27
29
33
2
4
7
7
7
15
9
11
37
16
16
16
23
45
4SA
45A
Source
Source
Type
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
Types: 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Mo. of
Observations
6
3
19
0
a
2
2
9
14
9
0
18
1
5
25
23
25
3
45
18
28
Temporal
TNMHC Emission Flu* (ug/m'-mln) Precision Variability
Mean
740
25,100
206
1,370
255
2,210
56.8
245
32.8
2120
138
2550
2330
316
2710
2990
16,700
3.52 E10
7.48 E9
Minimum
131
2,9000
20.0
1.80
140
920
0.60
3.29
0.06
606
138
746
74.4
69.6
117
608
15.8
1.83 E10
1.33 E10
Surface Impoundment
Spill Site
Controlled (RCRA) Landfill
Uncontrolled landfill
Test Soil Pile
Aerobic Uastewater Treatment
System
Maximum Std. Dev. Mo. of C.V. Mo. of C.V.
Obs. (X) Obs. (X)
1,800 0.25
62,800 32,800
2,400 535 ....
4,000 1,560 . '. |
370 162 . . 2 63.8
3,500 1,820 . .2 82 4
230 75.6 . 9 133
922 307 . . 14 125
169 55.5 . 9 169
5,570 1,250 8 19.7 3 33.0
138 . . ...
5,090 1,800 ...
14,900 3,520 8 16.3 25 151
l.*80 316 . . 23 100
17,700 4,040 6 9.44 25 149
7,250 3,690 . . 3 123
103,000 27,300 ...
4.46 E10 7.43 E9 . . 26 14.1
1.33 E10 3.37 E9 ....
8 - Subsurface Leak
9 - Covered Landfill
10 - Chemical Production Unit
11 • Drum Storage Area
12 - Landtreatment Unit
13 • Mining Operation
Spatial
Variability
Ho. of
Obs.
6
3
19
8
18
5
7
4
8
45
18
28
C.V.
(I)
91.2
130
260
114
.
58.8
70.8
43.8
82.2
88.2
164
21.1
45.1
Anaerobic Uastewatar Treatmetn System
-------
SECTION 4
METHODS COMPARISON AND EVALUATION
This section presents data comparing emission fluxes for given sites determined
using multiple sampling methods, e.g. flux chamber versus transect. Also included in this
section is the results of a sensitivity analysis performed to evaluate the effects of various
parameters on the measurement data.
4.1 METHODS COMPARISON
As expected, very little comparative data was found. The only studies found with
comparative data were Nos. 23, 24, 25, and 26 in the database. These were all part of an
overall EPA study (2,3). The comparative data for TNMHC emission fluxes from that
study are shown in Table 4-1.
4.2 RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
A sensitivity analysis was performed by pooling together all the flux chamber data
and attempting to correlate emission rate and concentration data with site, operating,
and meteorological parameters. As many as 268 observations, or data pairs, were
available in the database. The results of this analysis is shown in Table 4-2. Correlation
coefficients and p-values for each correlation attempt are shown.
The correlation coefficients show the degree of agreement between the data pairs
and a straight line function. A correlation coefficient has a range of -1 to +1. A -1 or
+1 value indicates a perfect correlation between two parameters of interest while a zero
(0) correlation indicates no relationship. A positive correlation coefficient means that
there is a direct relationship between two parameters. A negative correlation coefficient
means that there is .an inverse relationship between two parameters. In other words, as
one of the two parameters increases in magnitude, the other parameter is decreasing in
26
-------
TABLE 4-1. COMPARISON OF DATA FOR VARIOUS EMISSION
MEASUREMENT METHODS
Emission TNMHC
Source Measurement Emission Flux
Type Method (/*g-C/m2-min)a
Active Landfill Flux Chamber 260 - 640
Transect 310 - 900
Surface Impoundment Flux Chamber 190
Concentration-Profile 56
Landtreatment Flux Chamber 43,500
(1 day after Concentration-Profile 75,000
application)
Landtreatment Flux Chamber 3,700
(2 days after Concentration-Profile 57,700
application)
equals micrograms of carbon.
27
-------
magnitude. A correlation coefficient equal to or greater than 0.7 is considered to be
good.
A p-value is the smallest value of a significance level (o) for which a hypothesis
test result becomes statistically significant. A hypothesis test is performed to determine
if the correlation coefficient is equal to zero. The alternative to this hypothesis then
would be that the correlation coefficient is different than zero (not equal to zero).
Choosing a significance level of 0.05 and comparing it to a p-value (from Table 4-2), it
can be determined whether the correlation coefficient is significantly different than zero.
If the p-value is less or equal to the significance level, then it can be concluded that the
correlation coefficient is not equal to zero. For p-values greater than the significance
level, then the conclusion is that the correlation coefficient is not significantly different
than zero. For example, the correlation of benzene emission rate with the concentration
of benzene in the source (soil or water) in Table 4-2 shows a correlation coefficient of
0.98 and a p-value of 0.0001 for 84 observations. The correlation coefficients for the two
variables are shown to be strongly related, while the p-value of less than 0.05 indicates
that the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero. Therefore, the
emission rate of benzene js dependent on the concentration of benzene in the source.
Statistically significant correlations in Table 4-2 are marked with a "*".
The evaluation of correlation coefficients indicates that the emission rate of
TNMHC is strongly correlated to the emission rate benzene and the concentrations of
benzene, compound #3, and compound #4 (all components that contribute to TNMHC
emissions). The emission rate of benzene is strongly linked to the concentration of
benzene in the source (bulk soil or liquid). The correlation coefficient and p-values,
however, also indicate the emission rate of benzene is linked to the concentrations of
compounds #3 and #4, indicating that the concentrations of the various compounds in
the emission source tend to vary uniformly. The emission rates for compounds #2, #3,
and #4 would be expected to be related to the concentrations of these same components
in the source, but these relationships were not found in the data.
28
-------
TABLE 4-2. CORRELATIONS FOR FLUX CHAMBER DATA IN (^g/m2-min)
Correlation
Correlation of: Correlated to: Coefficient
Emission Flux TNMHC *Emission Flux Benzene
Emission Flux Compound 2
Emission Flux Compound 3
Emission Flux Compound 4
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
Emission Flux Benzene Emission Flux Compound 2
Emission Flux Compound 3
Emission Flux Compound 4
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
*Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
Emission Flux *Emission Flux Compound 3
for Compound 2 *Emission Flux Compound 4
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
0.98
0.11
0.33
0.47
0.03
0.99
0.10
0.97
0.96
0.31
-0.14
0.05
-0.22
0.11
0.56
0.40
0.43
0.57
0.27
0.98
0.20
0.98
0.95
0.24
-0.65
0.70
0.39
-0.58
0.64
0.98
0.94
-0.09
0.05
-0.07
0.07
0.04
-0.06
-0.13
0.28
0.00
-0.16 -
0.50
p- value
0.0001
0.1026
0.0001
0.0001
0.7956
0.0001
0.2567
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0872
0.8161
0.0027
0.3536
0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.1135
0 . 0001
0.0891
0.0001
0 . 0001
0.2360
0.0018
0.0016
0.1817
0.0121
0.0023
0.0001
0.0001
0.4402
0.5875
0.2474
0.3946
0.6342
0.3694
0.1029
0.0021
0.9790
0.1058
0.0010
No. of
Obs.
100
227
188
169
86
• 115
139
134
123
224
159
22
180
71
39
101
94
92
34
84
70
87
82
25
20
17
13
18
20
186
169
70
118
235
135
124
185
164
116
187
102
40
(Continued)
29
-------
TABLE 4-2. (Continued)
Correlation of:
Emission Flux
for Compound 3
Emission Flux
for Compound 4
•
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
.
Correlation
Correlated to: Coefficient p-value
* Emission Flux Compound 4
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
*Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
Concentration TNMHC
Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
. Concentration Benzene
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
Concentration Compound 2
Concentration Compound 3
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
*Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Clouds
0.96
0.04
0.29
0.33
-0.01
0.29
0.55
0.64
0.62
0.77
-0.57
0.63
0.18
0.41
0.31
0.49
0.40
-0.19
-0.24
-0.18
0.12
-0.39
0.62
0.28
0.76
0.57
1.00
0.51
-0.24
-0.79
0.39
-0.83
0.08
-0.05
0.99
0.98
-0.23
-0.47
0.73
-0.35
-0.45
0.64
0.0001
0.7706
0.0018
0 . 0004
0.9365
0.0016
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0002
0.0030
0.1485
0.0001
0.0010
0.0001
0.0001
0.0984
0.0513
0.4724
0.3239
0.1200
0.0043
0.0298
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0 . 0001
0.2488
0.4228
0.0035
0.1645
0.9506
0.6202
0.0001
0.0001
0.1079
0.0020
0.0008
0.0459
0.0326
0.0025
No. of
Obs.
171
68
111
112
146
117
102
89
41
90
38
20
63
110
108
122
117
76
69
18
65
17
19
59
68
66
56
50
25
3
55
4
3
101
118
113
51
41
17
32
23
20
(Continued)
30
-------
TABLE 4-2. (Continued)
Correlation of:
Concentration
of Compound 2
Concentration
of Compound 3
'
Concentration
of Compound 4
Temperature Ambient Air
Temperature F/C Air
Temperature Bulk
Temperature Surface
Wind Speed
Correlation
Correlated to: Coefficient p-value
Concentration Compound 3
* Concentration Compound 4
Temperature
Temperature
Temperature
Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
Ambient Air
F/C Air
Bulk
Surface
Concentration Compound 4
Temperature
Temperature
Temperature
Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
Temperature
Temperature
*Temperature
Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
*Temperature
Temperature
*Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
Temperature
*Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
Temperature
Wind Speed
Clouds
Wind Speed
Clouds
Clouds
Ambient Air
F/C Air
Bulk
Surface
0
0
0
-0
-0
-0
-0
0
0
-0
-0
-0
0
.60
.73
.32
.05
.01
.06
.10
.47
.96
.15
.33
.33
.69
NS
Ambient Air
F/C Air
Bulk
Surface
F/C Air
Bulk
Surface
Bulk
Surface
0
-0
-0
0
-0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
.62
.22
.42
.75
.19
.23
.60
.82
.59
.77
.14
.33
.67
.82
NS
Surface
•
-0
0
-0
0
0
-0
-0
.50
.67
.30
.63
.19
.61
.50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0001
.0001
.0001
.5546
.9144
.4287
.3350
.0259
.0001
.2000
.0106
.0384
.0001
.8531
.0032
.1105
.0066
.0005
.2977
.2786
.0047
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0783
.1507
.0001
.0001
.1650
.0264
.0001
.0017
.0071
.0459
.0015
.0325
No. of
Obs.
121
110
139
120
99
156
85
22
126
77
60
39
58
42
20
54
41
17
33
24
20
226
134
268
165
20
132
210
127
20
118
110
17
113
24
18
* denotes a statistically significant correlation
ND denotes "No Data."
31
-------
Meteorological factors demonstrate certain strong relationships in the database.
For example, cloud cover is related to all emission rates (TNMHC, benzene, compounds
#2, #3, and #4) based on the p-values. Cloud cover was also found to be related to the
concentrations of benzene and compounds #2, #3, and #4. The statistical relationship
of such obviously unrelated parameters points up the limitations of such evaluations.
Not surprisingly, bulk and surface temperatures were found to be related to cloud cover
based on the p-values. In general, temperature measurements of the bulk material, the
emitting surface, and the air inside the flux chamber were all found to be strongly
correlated to one another.
In addition, sensitivity analyses performed on past studies were identified during
the compilation of the database. Study #20 of the database was a test program in the
development of the flux chamber method (4). The total variability in emission rate was
found to consist of the following components:
Flux chamber air temperature 26.3%
Sampling location (spatial variability) 17.2%
Temporal variability 24:0%
Sampling + analytical variability 44.1%
100.0%
A similar analysis was performed as part of a landtreatment study (5). The
temporal variability accounted for 81.8% of the total variability. This is not unexpected,
since VOC emissions from landtreatment facilities decrease rapidly with time after
application. The remaining variability (total - temporal) was found to consist of the
following components:
Flux chamber air temperature 44.1%
Sampling location (spatial variability) 50.4%
Surface shading 1.5%
Sampling + analytical variability 3.9%
100.0%
32
-------
SECTION 5
REFERENCES
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series, Volume II - Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions at
Superfund Sites (Revised). EPA-450/l-89-002a. August 1990.
2. Balfour, Wetherold, and Lewis. Evaluation of Air Emissions From
Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. EPA 600/2-
85/057. June 1984.
3. Balfour and Schmidt. Sampling Approaches for Measuring Emission Rates
From Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities. Presented at 77th Annual APCA
Meeting - Paper 84-3.3. San Francisco, June 24-29, 1984.
4. Radian Corporation. Soil Gas Sampling Techniques of Chemicals for
Exposure Assessment, Tustin Spill Site Data Volume. EPA Contract No. 68-
02-3513, Work Assignment 32. July 27, 1984.
5. Eklund, Nelson, and Wetherold. Field Assessment of Air Emissions and
Their Control at a Refinery Land Treatment Facility: Volume I. EPA 600/2-
86-0864 (NTIS PB88-124540). September 1986.
33
-------
APPENDIX A
DATABASE OF EMISSION FLUX AND
EMISSION RATE MEASUREMENT DATA
-------
Ftbruary 1990
PROJECT 1
C(,..,,- c. I » • « " wwrv* ri. BUMIbC Ml
Sourct S,upl» Sanplt Saoplt -
Typt tan.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
ATM Point
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 5
Lagoon S
Lagoon 5
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
Lagoon 4
8
7
3
4
6a
6b
5
1
2
4
1
B
6
2
9
5a
5b
7
3
4
1
TNHHC
12587
15911
8443
14936
23046
27035
18437
16310
13739
12188
275327
213095
250811
314929
226296
250811
218753
247040
205552
190466
184431
Btnzni
6759
9972
5097
4077
10725
9241
9795
9418
8532
6825
134835
110508
119183
152561
111639
125406
101645
129366
104662
101645
95610
Cipad 2
2460
2305
1822
1494
3058
3701
2770
2814
1866
2681
27344
20744
29607
25270
27910
30361
33190
39602
24138
14389
22064
Cnpnd 3
•XSXVCX2XS
1099
1230
448
474
1740
1252
1398
1323
1044
971
19047
« 14332-
17990
25081
15464
18122
15935
18292
14238
11994
10296
M.. iug/g or i
Cnpnd 4 TNNHC Bmzmt Cnpnd 2 Cnpnd 3
211
226
209
130
445
501
439
290
408
372
7977
5205
8241
14445
7355
7769
7355
1961
3300
2244
4300
4600
4200
3600
4300
4300
4100
3900
3900
3700
62000
58000
62000
62000
62000
59000
58000
60000
62000
59000
60000
940
749
680
650
760
730
730
700
690
640
9700
100M
11000
11000
11000
10000
10000
11000
11000
10000
10000
ig/Li
Cnpnd 4 A
2400
2300
2400
2700
2100
1900
2200
2800
2900
2500
8100
7900
8300
8700
8100
8200
8100
8200
8300
7700
7800
TENPERA1
«h.Air F/C Air
25
24
25
23
25
25
23
22
25
24
21
22
24
24
24
24
27
25
24
24
22
30
31
35
39
27
&/
25
31
30
29
22
23
27
31
25
23
27
27
25
24
22
WES (C)
Bulk Surface
19
19.4
19.6
19.9
5fl 7
«V.£
91 1
*»»^
20 fl
*w« v
71
*l
21 fl
4**B
21.5
21 4
£*«^
21 2
• * • &
22 5
**•«!
21.5
21 2
•>**£
21 B
** • H
22.1
22.4
22.9
22.4
22.2
-------
PROJECT 1 (continued)
NET I PROCESS VMIAILES
to
Sieep bitting Haste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Mention
US Clouts Air Area Volnee Depth Type Density Density Noi«tve Brevity Tiee
(•oh) (I) (L/einl (t2) U3t (•) (g/ci3> (9/ce3) Wt.I) (g/u3) (hours)
18
13
18
IB
16
12
9
18
16
17
1
4
7
11
3
7
9
4
mwTTr»msa
10
IS
20
30
90
95
90
70
SO
10
100
100
90
100
100
95
60
60
95
100
ranrrrcj
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
nncssncs;
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
120770
15050
15050
15050
15050
15050
15050
15050
15050
15030
15050
15050
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530
219530 1
45420
45420
49420
45420
45420
45420
45420
45420
45420
45420
45420
cxzx
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.B
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
isnnrasscnzssssscntnzaB
ji 11 n. i,
1776
1776
1776
1776
1774
1774
1776
1776
1776
1776
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
-------
e-v
II
vnl!
fv> M ro
I
£
vj
I
ru -.
o1 £
i
: i
W «J II (V)
n
n
n Js
ii
H UI
II
II
ii g
ii -K
II 5
n
It **
it
II
n >
II 3
ii Cr
n •
^ yi || ^'
ii
II TI
II >.
M 0
n
n *
y ** " -•
** UI II -,
n
H
II
II
II
!l £
« fS i! ?
II
II
H MM
II
II
ii n
•° -0 ii "1
-• o o ii a.
->i o • n
XI UI O* II UI
II
II
II O
• -° ii "1
*•** * If Q.
w H
ru n -t-
n
M
iv ru T\J M •
ru 0* -» ii >
In Co -» H _,
II
ff -n
II Xk
II O
II
II >
II —
!! -1
II 09
II C
Ii rr
M
n
ii =
fl -fc
II ft)
j, *
• -H
1 t/)
: 8
• 3D
1 O
• m
1 O
: i
• n
i I
• to
' O
1 -1
" r-
(
•H
m
1
X)
c
m
n
M
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
n
-------
PROJECT 2 (continued)
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
us
(mph)
="
5.6
6.2
5.2
4.8
US
(«ph>
Clouds
(X)
-.-.-.-„,
Clouds
(X)
Sweep Emitting
Air Area
(L/min) (m2)
-—• -— -=============='
17.8
17.8
17.8
200
Sweep Emitting
Air Area*
(L/min) (m2)
5 15
5 15
Waste
Volume
(m3)
========
K
12
13
MET &
Waste
Volume
(m3)
U
U
Soil /Pond
Depth
(m)
===========
Soil
Type
t
=======:
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Bulk
Density
(9/cm3)
=========
1.5
1.U
1.5
1.5
Particle
Density
(g/cm3)
=========:
2.58
2.6
2.61
2.58
Soil
Moisture
(Ut.X)
=========
10
5.2
8.1
10
Spec i f i c
Gravity
(g/cm3)
=========:
Retention
Time
(hours)
==========
PROCESS VARIABLES
Soil /Pond
Depth
(m)
0.93
0.93
Soil
Type
Sand
Sand
Bulk
Density
(9/cm3)
1.2
1.35
Particle
Density
<9/cm3)
2.58
2.56
Soil
Moisture
(Ut.X)
6.1
3.8
Specific
Gravity
(9/Cffl3)
Retention
Time
(hours)
-------
August-Static.* 19B9
PROJECT 3
Sourci .Supli
Typi Ttch
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Siapli
Aria
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Ana A
Aria A
Aria A
Aria A
Supli
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7a
7b
8
9a
9b
lOa
lOb
EMISSION
TNMHC Bmiini
5.61
11.8
25 0.089
44.7
42.4
327
474
8932 6.01
5390 0.67
3554
363
13052
4928
RATES Iug/i2-.in)
Capnd 2
0.85
12.4
9.2
254
5082
4235
3015
250
9202
2945
Capnd 3
0.322
3.55
1.04
1.15
71.2
716
1224
1109
. 147
3927
330
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CMC.
-------
PROJECT 3 (continued)
NET i PROCESS VARIABLES
MS Cloud*
(•ph> (1)
SUMP
Air
(L/iin)
3.5
5
3.5
S
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
Emitting
Aria
(•2)
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
1456
Matti Soil /Pond
Volutt Depth
(•3) (•)
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
2220
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
Soil
Tyoi
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Sand
Bulk
tensity
(g/u3>
1.52
.48
.54
.47
.47
.48
.56
.56
1.58
1.67
1.67
1.43
1.43
Particli Soil
Dmity NoiiUri
Ig/ct3) (Mt.Z)
28.6
33.2
27.9
35.5
35.5
33.2
23.9
23.9
29.2
29.4
29.4
29.3
29.3
Spxific
Gravity
(g/u3)
2.59
2.55
2.59
2.4B
2.48
2.55
2.71
2.71
2.13
2.72
2.72
2.77
2.77
Ritmtion
TIM
(noun)
-------
PROJECT 4
August-October 1989
====r===============================s=============s====================
Source Sample
Type Tech.
Sanfcle Sample
Area Point
EMISSION RATES (ug/min)
TNMHC Benzene Cropnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
•__.
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
4 Transect run 1
4 Transect run 2
4 Transect run 4
1200000 336000
1320000 420000
4200000 720000
33.9 2.1
33.9 2.1
0.47 0.046
16.6
17.1
24.3
Source Sample
Type Tech.
Sample Sample
Area Point
EMISSION RATES (ug/ro2-min)
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
4 F/C Test Pile 1
4 F/C Test Pile 2
3500
920
1010
227
190
37
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
.................................
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
16 4
0.63 0.065
17
26
19
38
21
20
-------
PROJECT 4 (continued)
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth
(mph) (X) (L/min) (m2)
-------
PROJECT 5
vO
IUy 19B9
»llllim«
SotTCr Sjllpl*
Type Tich
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Saeple Supli
ATM Point
********
Zoni
Zoni
loot
loot
ZOM
Zoni
Zont
loot
ZOM
Zont
Zone
ZOM
Zoni
i*********ssst
1
2
3
4
5
6
It
7b
8
9
10
11
12
Zoni 2 13a
Zoni 2 13b
ZOAI 2 14
Zoni 2 15
ZOM 4 14
Zoni 3 17
3ZSXSUSZ»SZZZ»
EMISSION
TNIWC Imime
•****************.
37.4
3.97
9.15
11.3
38.9
10.2
109
70
15.1
7.4
7.99
5B.3
9.47
6.88
8.1
9.02
15.3
74.5
1.8
RATES (ug/i2-iin) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. iug/q or ng/L) TEHPERATURES (C)
tapnd 2
8.65
0.12
0.52
13.5
7.12
284
7.26
4.96
0.81
10.6
0.44
17.8
1.02
0.06
0.27
bond 3 Cund4 TWWC Benmi Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cnpnd 4 Art.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
^mf-rr^-Tr^rf^r,^^rf-~^sf-x-s--sassss***********s*s*****s**s*ss******s*t****ssi***fass*ts****s***s**
2.63 ' 0.21
0.08
0.24
0.53
1.13 3.35
0.11 2.34
1.11 8.79
4.46
0.85 1.02
• 0.28
0.1
3.66
0.14 0.74
0.4
0.44
0.72
0.81
5.03
0.46
-------
PROJECT 5 (continued)
RET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Smip Emitting faitt Soil/Pond Soil Bulk ParticU Soil Specific Retention
HS Clouds Air ATM Voluat Depth Typi Dimity tensity Noiitwe Gravity Tin
lopb) il) (Hun) (§2) Ii3) (•) (g/«3) (9/u3) (Ht.Z) (g/ci3) (hours)
-------
April 1988
PROJECT 6
Source
Type
mmmmitmrnxs
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Sample
Tech.
Transect
Transect
Transect
Transect
Transect
Transect
Transect
-- Sample
Area
465' dnud
205' dnud
1415' dnud
1415' dnud
1265' dnud
1265' dnud
upwind
Sample
Point
1
2
3a
3b
4
5
6
THMHC
EBStTSZKC
131
-M9
157
162
142
805
82.9
EMISSION RATES
Benzene Cnpnd
14
(ug/m3)
2
.8
12.7
44
43
78
73
3
.9
.5
.1
.2
.9
Cnpnd
32
21
23
24
10
, 8
42
3
.7
.1
.5
.3
.9
.4
.6
Cnpnd
7
10
16
15
10
11
8
4
.2
.2
.1
.5
.2
.3
.3
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE COMC. (ug/fl or ng/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Cnpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
20.38
20.43
20.22
20.22
20.29
20.26
20.15
-------
PROJECT 6 (continued)
Sweep
US Clouds Air
<«ph> (X) (L/nin)
7.6
7.6
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.3
NET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retentioi
Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Tine
(mZ) (n3> (m) (9/cm3) (g/cm3) (Ut.X) (g/oriJ) (hours)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
to
-------
January-March 1989
Flux Chamber
PROJECT 7
Ui
Source
Type
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Sample
Are*
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Control
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Nixed Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Vent Pile
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
TNMHC
230.25
59.55
71.03
111.75
25.35
8.1
3.94
0.89
0.6
855
202.5
301.5
81
534
106.5
55.8
922.5
152.25
72.68
123
9.08
9
3.29
168.75
62.48
41.4
7.37
13.65
1.02
0.15
0.14
0.06
EMISSION
Benzene
7270
2730
2760
9000
910
400
290
0
0
30100
7970
12000
2810
26400
4230
2370
34800
7010
2710
4140
0
270
0
7640
1450
940
390
0
0
0
0
0
!««»»««« mmMmmmmmmMm mmmmnm ***m
RATES (ufl/«2-»in. )
Cmpnd 2
39400
10300
14800
17300
4910
1340
830
340
260
112000
31400
38600
14400
101000
20500
9410
130000
25900
12600
25400
2270
900
90
33700
14500
8000
2040
2130
440
80
0
0
Cmpnd 3
xxmmxmmmm
30100
6370
10400
6530
4220
830
590
0
0
48200
21800
21600
13900
58200
13900
6210
69000
14600
13100
21300
3030
1700
370
22500
12600
8580
1750
3500
0
0
0
0
Cmpnd 4
7590
1680
2640
1700
1080
250
180
0
0
16900
6130
5560
3280
15100
3610
1730
17500
3870
3300
5620
740
460
90
5570
3110
2270
440
790
0
0
0
0
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/fl or
TNMHC Benzene
55
110
98
15
39
13
24
0
0
91.75
91.75
33
88
88
79
. 22.5
22.5
8.2
15
15
4
0
0
111.67
110
78
65
11
3.8
0
0
0
Cmpnd 2
iSSSSSSSSSS
515
880
780
250
290
190
390
56
220
617.5
617.5
360
660
660
590
280
280
210
200
200
87
0.55
0
953.33
850
670
770
270
150
51
36
72
Cmpnd 3
1010
1620
1410
730
670
440
510
202
630
1067.5
1067.5
830
1260
1260
1070
710
710
640
530
530
333
25.1
4.11
1790
1590
1250
1730
610
364
182
253
342
*»/«•> TEMPERATURES
Cmpnd 4 Arab. Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
190
310
270
130
130
110
130
35
120
213.75
213.75
150
250
250
210
125
125
110
97
97
59
4.3
0.62
346.67
300
240
330
110
87
38
40
54
-------
Sweep
WS Clouds Air
(mph) (X) (L/min)
5
5
5
S
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
, 5
5
5
5
5
S
5
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Emitting
Area
<«2>
a
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
a
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
a
8
8
a
MET t
Waste
Volume
(«3>
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
3.06
PROCESS VARIABLES
Soil /Pond Soil Bulk
Depth Type Density
<"> (g/c«3)
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
0.91 loamy sand
— /
Particle Soil Specific Retention
Density Moisture Gravity Time
(9/cm3) (Ut.X) (g/cm3) (hours)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-------
ST-V
in
I
r* t en
i •' -
ft i o
!! S I
it 5 i
n S i
H
M
N
H
H
II
H
H
II
H
N
N
H
H
II
H
II
N
n
H
H
n
n
it
H
II
II
N
II
II
N
N
II
II
H
II
II
II
N
II
II
H
II
H
N
n
H
n
N
H
It
H
N
n
H
M
If
H
H
H
II
II
II
H
N
II
II
II
II
n
H
n
n
n
H
n
N
H
II
II
II
II
II
H
H
N
II
II
II
II
H
II
i!
H
H
H
H
Q
^
f
I
§
KBM
96
i I
n.
N
II ?
» n
N
It -n
it V
8 "
: §
N CD
H C
II «—
II Jr
M
n
N «l»
.1 5
H -*
-------
PROJECT a (continued)
us
(mph)
Sweep
Clouds Air
(X) (L/nin)
Emitting
Area
NET «
Waste
Volume
(m3)
. PROCESS VARIABLES
Soil /Pond Soil
Depth Type
Cm)
Bulk
Density
(g/cm3)
Particle
Density
(g/cm3)
Soil
Noisture
(Ut.X)
Specific
Gravity
(g/cm3)
t
Retention
Time
(hours)
2.4 M/A
-------
April 1988
Flu Charter
PROJECT 9
3SS38»*»SSSS==33BSS=333S3SS333SSS
3333ZB33X3BZS33S33333SCSS3B3333nSS3S3333Z33SS3333S84**3333X8;:
EMISSION RATES
-------
PROJECT 9 (continued)
>-•
00
US Clouds
Uph) (I)
S5SSS5SSSSSSSSSX3
X
NET |
Swcp Eii tt ing Hatte
Air Area Volute
(L/iinl (i2) Ii3)
iaSZZZSaasaasasaasaaaaSaasB
25.9 1052.09 5155.24
31.8 1052.09 5155.24
31.8 1052.09 5155.24
31.8 1052.09 5155.24
55.4 1052.09 5155.24
55.4 1052.09 5155.24
55.4 1032.09 5155.24
37.7 1052.09 5155.24
18.2 1052.09 5155.24
57.3 1052.09 5155.24
37.7 1052.09 5155.24
55.4 1052.09 5155.24
29.8 1052.09 5155.24
30.8 1052.09 5155.24
30.8 1052.09 5155.24
30.8 1052.09 5155.24
30.8 1052.09 5155.24
25.9 1052.09 5155.24
18.2 1052.09 5155.24
35.7 1052.09 5135.24
35.7 1092.09 5153.24
PROCESS VARIABLES
Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Tiee
<•> (g/cri) (g/ce3) tWt.I) Ig/ci3) (hours)
aaagaasaaaasaaaasaasaaaaaagagasaCTKaaasaMseaaaaaaasaagssgsaaaa
4.9 |0
4.9 10
4.9 10
4.9 10
4.9 10
4.9 10
4.9 10
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
-------
JyM mi PROJECT 10
Sa.pl. S«plf Sa.pJe ---- "" ___ ^E_PT. SOU^CO^^, or .,/L, TaPEUATURES (C)
^
* 2 » 3 i i . _ .
1 I I 20 20
VO
-------
PROJECT 10 (continued)
NET i PROCESS VARIABLES
US «.* ' u , "
°lu" Dtpth Typt
21100 25320 1.2
-------
September 1986 PROJECT 11
Flux ChMber
EMISSION RATES TEMPERATURES (C)
•T-^£^=^==^^=^==i=i=^^^H
N>
-------
PROJECT 11 (continued)
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(i«2) (m3> (m) (g/cniJ) (g/onJ) (Wt.X) (fl/cm3) (hours)
s»«*=========«»«»*«««»»**««==««====««==««MM«SMss=z=ssss====sssB
160.7
N>
N>
-------
November 1985
Flu* Chuber
PROJECT 13
"8ZSSSsass««*S33Sa.33B»B3B3S3a.33=SSS*3SS3BSSSBSBSS3SS*SSSSSSB:
«SSSB3BSS3S3SS3SBSBrSSSS:
BBX3SBSS33SBBKBBSS33ZSSB33BSSS3S33B2333B8BSB
Sourci
Type
Suple
Tech.
Saaple
Area
Sa.pli
Point
EMISSION RATES lug/.2-iin.)
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or •g/L)
TEMPERATURES (C)
TNMHC Benzene Capnd 2 Ctpnd 3 Cipnd 4 TNMKC Benzene Cipnd 2 Capnd 3 Ctpnd 4 Aab.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
SB.«B=S==BSS=3S=BSSaBSBS==BSa=SBS3aSSBBS=BSaB3BSBBB3BS==SSS3B,SSsaSB==BB=BS=B==a»=a==B=S==BB==SS==B===r=S==BB=»B===BB,S==BBBBBB.»,BB.«BBB=»=SBSSBBS=B=S«»=«3,B»SS
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Grid A
Grid B
Grid E
Grid F
Grid A
Grid B
BridE
Grid F
SM Corner
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2783.33
5266.67
3950
3250
19166.67
8055.56-
3715.28
6423.61
944.44
6541.67
4645. B3
2680.56
4805.56
526.39
3569.44
1993.06
590.97
777.78
186.81
234.72
3.33
18.82
20.14
;5.62
0
0
250
0
0
61.8
71.55
52.55
101
61.8
71.55
52.55
89.9
20.2
14.2
14.05
13.25
23.35
2.45
1.B75
2.29
2.045
4.49
0.0035
0.02675
0.03815
0.07265
0.00715
to
Sample points 1 - 4 and 5 - 8 represent the same sampling events.
Sample points 1 through 4 were analyzed by on-site GC and sample
points 5 through 9 were analyzed by off-site GC.
-------
PROJECT 13 (continued)
NET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Sneep Emitting Haste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific (Mention
MS Clouds Air Aria Voluu Depth Typi Density Density Hoitture Gravity Tiee
leph) (1) (L/ein) Ie2) Ie3> (•) (g/u3) (g/ce3) IHt.l) (g/c«3) (hours)
s
5
5
S
5
5
S
5
S
1749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
3749.
N)
-------
October 1983
PROJECT 14
I
tn
Source Sanple
Type Tech.
3ZZZ3S3333SZZSZS
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
1 F/C
1 F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
••**»»*»aSKg
Saeple
Area
iZZS3SCZZS3S3
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Talk
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Test Tank
Z=SS3S3
Saepl e
Point
E3S2Z3Z:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
il
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MISSION RATES (ug/i2-tin)
TNHHC lenzene Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cipnd 4
7710
9050
7520
8240
8240
8250
14800
9690
12000
8670
8670
8880
4500
13200
7530
10800
9380
13200
14000
19400
18300
14000
18800
14200
10100
72200
88500
94100
76800
76100
SAHPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or ig/L)
TNHHC Benzene Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cipnd 4
™=ZSSSZZS3SSZS3S8SasS333SSZZ3SS3S;
•8
TEMPERATURES 1C)
88
88
88
88
88
88
18
N
88
18
Aek.Air
ISSSSXSS
32
30
27
30
30
28
28
32
23
32
32
28
30
28
32
31
32
32
26
26
24
25
25
22
23
24
24
23
22
F/C Air
Z33SZ333333SZ
31
30
27
29
30
28
24
31
30
32
32
26
30
26
31
29
31
32
26
24
24
24
24
24
22
23
24
25
24
23
Bulk
Surface
— VT9S3SSSSZSXCXS-
20 20
21
18
21
20
22
21
23
23
23
23
21
22
21
23
23
23
23
21
23
23
23
23
23
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
19
21
21
23
21
24
24
24
24
22
24
23
24
24
24
25
22
23
23
23
23
23
20
20
21
21
21
20
-------
PROJECT 14 (continued)
US Clouds
NET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Sntip Etitting Uacti Soil/Pond Sail
Air Aria Voluw Dipth Type
S333S3SS333B3:
Itph) (I)
3SS3333S3S3SS3SS
2.S
2.4
2.3
2.7
2.5
2
1.7
2.1
2.6
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.2
1.7
2.1
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
2
1.8
1.9
2
2
.9
.4
.7
.5
.7
.5
(L/tin)
SSSSSSXSSBS
5
S
5
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
5
S
1.4
4.8
4.8
4.8
9.8
IS
21.2
S
5
S
5
5
5
S
S
S
S
(•2) (rii
SSSSS3S33S33S3SSSSS
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
(•)
ESSSSSSS
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.44
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
1.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
Bulk Particlt Soil Specific Rttmtion
Dtnsity Inisity Moiituri Gravity TIM
Ig/cri) Ig/ci3) (ttt.Z) (g/ci3) (hours)
-------
April - Stpttaotf 1983
PROJECT 15
Snort*
wW bV
Type
5
5
5
3
5
5
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
§Mftlft Ca^ola
wVBJfAV wflMHtV
Ttch. Area
F/C Ctll 1
F/C Call 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Ctll 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill '
F/C Cill
F/C Cell
F/C Cill
F/C Cell
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill
F/C Cell
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cell
F/C Cell
F/C Cell
F/C Cill
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cell 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cell 2
SiMl*
wMVfr* V
Point
1
2a
2b
3
4
5
&
7
a
9a
9b
10
11
12
13a
13b
14
15
16
17
18a
18b
19
20a
20b
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35a
35b
36
37
3Ba
38k
EHISSION RATES Iuo/t2-iia)
TNHHG Benzene Capri 2 Cipnd 3 Capri 4
62200
10700
88200
60200
31500
20200
17700
14200
31500
56100
50900
72200
76400 -
53700
37100
39700
42300
59600
59500
41700
48000
45400
53000
48900
43400
86MO
76900
99600
10700
88500
57200
40000
9330
18400
3040
4160
38700
21400
21700
21000
16800
33100
17000
17600
19800
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CMC. (119/9 or iq/L)
TNHHC Btnzmt Capri 2 Capri 3 Capri 4
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
. 104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
/ 104.2
^- 104.2
104.2
78.4
78.4
78.4
79; 4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
78.4
7B.4
A-27
-------
PROJECT 15 (continued)
RET t PROCESS VARIABLES
TEMPERATURES (C)
A*.Air
I1JH1II
18
21
21
24
24
25
24
24
18
23
23
23
25
28
32
32
34
27
28
28
28
28
28
33
33
28
IS
17
14
19
19
19
20
21
20
21
25
25
2k
24
17
27
27
28
28
F/C Air
22
27
27
27
25
25
25
25
32
40
40 '
30
30
33
40
40
41
29
29
28
28
28
33
44
44
31
20
23
24
26
25
26
28
28
33
32
30
29
30
30
23
32
33
34
34
Bulk
' 25
26
6
25
25
25
25
25
25
• 25
25
26
26
25.9
27
27
27
26
26
26
26
26
25.9
26
26
26
25
25.4
25
25
26
26
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
26.3
25.4
26
26
26
26
Surface
18
21
21
26
26
25
25
25
29
37
37
30
30
30
35
35
38
29
29
28
28
28
30
40
40
32
17
20
20
22
22
24
22
23
33
34
28
28
28
29
20
30
30
31
31
HS
(•oh)
2.9
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
4.6
4.6-
3.8
Simp Emitting Haiti Soil/Pond
Clouds Air Arn VoluM Otpth
(I) (L/tin) (i2) |«3) (•)
4.71
1.77
1.77
6.73
11.99
11.99
16.13
16.13
4.16
0.401
0.401
3.54
3.54
4.28
1.35
1.35
5.52
6.32
6.32
20.57
20.57
20.57
3.75
0.488
0.488
3.52
4.71
3.18
3.18
4.99
10.96
10.96
20
26.09
26.09
. 12.25
5.94
30
26.09
26.09
26.09
20.57
15
IS
15
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3 .
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6'
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
'0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Soil
Typt
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand'
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
said
said
Balk
Density
(q/c«3)
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.43
1.45
1.4S
1.45
1.45
1.45
" 1.45
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.45
1.45
1.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
Particli Soil Sptcific Ri
Owsity teijtirt Gravity
(oVc*3) <».!)
-------
rxtwtu
PROJECT 15 (continued)
EMISSION RATES (ug/i2-iip>
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE COW. (119/9 or
aviv ic
Typt
3
s
3
3 •
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
5
5
3
5
3
5
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
ammpim
Ttch.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
M>pj>
Aria
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Ctll
Ctll
Ctll
Cill
Ctll
Cill 2
Cill 2
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Ctll 2
Cill 2
Cill 2
aM?l*
Point
39
40
41a
41b
42
43a
4A
44
43
46a
46b
47a
47b
48a
4Bb
49i
49b
50
Sla
51b
52
53a
S3b
S3c
54a
54b
55a
SSb
56a
36b
57a
37b
58a
SBb
59a
59b
60a
60b
61a
61b
62a
6,2b
634
63b
TWMC Bmztnt Cipnd 2
29200
38100
12700
10900
19700
14800
9630
34200
43700
60700
63300
71000
62800
33200
48800
97000
7300
40900
42400
43000
•
-
Ctpnd 3 CijMid 4
'430000
327000
324000
322000
511000
496000
53800
54300
601000
612000
293000
328000
272000
182000
104000
113000
416000
424000
601000
583000
592000
602000
89800*
64*00
TNHHC Btnztnt Ctpnd
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
y 104.:
*-~ 104.:
104.:
2_ 104.3
104.:
2 Ctffld 3 C*nd 4
•
I
»
\
\
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
754.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
734.2
A-29
-------
PROJECT 15 (continued)
TEMPERATURES (C)
A*.ftir F/C Air
IHIIIIIIIilllll
27
30
21
21
28
21
28
3ft
30
30
30
30
30
29
2?
30
30
39
37
37
32
38
38
38
38
38
35
33
43
43
41
41
32
32
37
37
34
34
38
38
42
42
42
42
35
37
36
36
38
39
39
38
38
38
38
37
37
36
3i
38
38
36
55
55
45
60
60
60
56
56
50
50
58
58
55
55
47
47
54
54
61
61
63
63
61
61
52
52
Bulk
Ul im>B3
27
26.5
26.5
26.5
26.1
26.3
26.3
26.3
26.3
26
26
26
26
26
26
29
29
31
30
30
37
26
26
26
35
35
36
36
36
36
36
36
37
37
35
35
36
36
35
35
36
36
36
36
Surf act
32
33
34
34
35
36
36
35
35
34
34
33
33
34
34
41
41
53
51
51
43
49
49
49
49
49
53
53
60. B
60.8
48
48
43
43
50.2
50.2
5B.8
58.3
66.3
66.3
59.1
59.1
56.2
56.2
SMMP Eiitting
US Clouds Air ATM
(•oh) (Z) (L/ain) (*2)
*T^**f*^**^*TmrTy***TW^»TT|{*Tft*HTimH!t
3.2
3.2
3.4
3.4
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.5
2.5
3.4
3.4
2.9
4.8
4.8
3
2.8
2.8
2.3
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.1
3
3
«
*
^
2.3
2.3
3.1
3.1
3.2
3;2
•2.9
2.9
9.B4
5.94
0.375
0.375
0.375
0.375
0.375
3.13
3.13
4.88
4.88
7.07
7.07
3.85
8.85
1.77
1.77
9.84
5.94
5.94
5
2.5
2.5
2.5
5
5
15.3
15.3
5
5
9.9
9.9-
4.38
4.88
9.34
9.34
4.88
4.88
2.4
2.4
4.88
4.38
15
IS
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
Kasti Soil /Pond Soil
VolBM Depth Typi
(t3> (•)
**mm*nii in.
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.37
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.37
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.37
0.57
0.37
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.37
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
said
sand
said
sari
sari
Mad
Mid
said
said
sand
sand
saad
said
said
said
said
said
said
saad
sand
said
said
sari
sail
saod
safflT
said
sand
said
said
saad
said
sand
said
said
said
saod
said
said
said
sari
sari
sari
sari
Bulk Particli Soil SpKific f
Dmity Utility Noirtirt Gravity
-------
PROJECT 15 (continued)
PROJECT 11$
Sovct Saapli Saipli
Typt Itch. ATM
S
3
S
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
-3
5
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
F/C C«li 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C CHI 1
F/C Ctll 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Ctll 1
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C . Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C C»ll 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C CHI 2
F/C Cill 2
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Cill 1
F/C Ctll 1
F/C Cill 1
Sutit
Point
64
654
63b
664
66*
67a
67k
684
68b
69a
69b
704
705
71
724
72b-
734
73b
744
74b
74e
734
73b
76
774
77b
784
78b
79i
79b
804
80b
814
81b
824
aa
834
83b
BIISSION RATES Itt9/i2-ai«>
TIMNC taiimt Ctf* 2
1117000
IB7000
168000
149000
168000
142000
124*00
181000
179000
176000
165NO
232000
223000
37400
37200
47000
42300
50600
50300 -
49700
54900
45500
44200
48800
50400
C*ft4 3 Capri 4
268000
32300
26700
318000
327000
319000
330000
350000
337000
386000
14800
392000
382000
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE COK.
TNKC Bmzim Caps* 2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104 1
• VT« * •
104.2
L
/ 104.2
104.2
104.2
104.2
104 1
i V^» £
104 1
iV~* A
104 2
4 V~» &
104.2
104 2
* l^»» *
104 2
4 VT* £
104 2
* WT» A
104.2
(i»9/9 or if/L)
C*pwl 3 C** 4
754.2
754.2
734.2
754.2
754.2
734.2
754.2
754.2
754.2
754.2
754.2
754.2
734.2
A-31
-------
PROJECT 15 (continued)
HET k PROCESS VARIABLES .
TBKRATORES (C)
.at. Air
asaaaia
24
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
26
26
24
24
24
25
25
27
27
27
27
27
27
26
26
23
23
26
26
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
fit Air
••WilBSam
23
28
28
28
28
30
30
29
29
29
29
28
28
24
25
• 25
29
29
31
31
31
32
32
30
30
30
24
24
29
29
29
29
31
31
35
35
34
34
Bulk
!•••••••
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
33
33
33
33
33
33
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25.9
25.9
25
25
Sorfaci
25
.29
'29
- 29
29
15
IS
12.4
12.1
31
31
31
31
24
• 25
25
27.05
27.05
30
30
30
31. B
31.8
30
30
30
23
23
26
26
27
27
29
29
31
31
32
32
MS Cloudi
tipb) (Z)
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
2
2
• 2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
2
2
2
2
2
2.2
2.2
2.2
3
3 .
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
3.4
3.4
3.1
3.1
SMIO E«i t ting
Air . Arta
(l/oin) (i2)
5
2.5
2.5
' 5
5
15.3
15.3
5
5
9.9
9.9
5
5
4.88
9.84
9.84
4.88
4.88
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.88
4.88
12.5
4.88
4.88
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
MMMVM
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
fasti Soil/Port Soil
Volut Bitih Tyft
(•3) (•)
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
1.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.6 sart
0.6 sart
0.6 sart
0.6 sart
0.6 MM
0.6 sart
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
tart
•art
sand
•art
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart
sart-
sart
sart
sart
mmmmmmm*-
talk Ptrtielt Soil Specific ft
DMiity Dmity Mifert gravity
<9/u3) (f/ci3) «t.U (g/aJ)
B*M**mmMM3M
1.45
1.45
1.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
1.45
.3
" .3
.3
.3
.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
.45
•••••••MMMM
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.68
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.63
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
•aaoBBi
»
A-32
-------
Octobtr-NovMbtr 1984
Flu Gbubir
PROJECT 16
EHISSION RATES (ug/i2-ain.)
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (uq/g or iq/L)
Typt
BOXB
Ift
I
ammptr
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
• F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
-F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
• >f«
F/C
•1 >M
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
OW*fU*
Aria
HMMMa
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Point TNHHC Bnzmt Cipnd 2
rTT¥TlHHlll|iiliiln|l|i | i i i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
112.8
14946
8538
1348.2
1954.8
2889
8787.6
2004
2779.8
997.8
898.8
482.4
2943.6
384.6
811.2
1311
H267.8
153.6
435
74.4
740.4
149.4
384
178.2
627.6
107.4
69.6 .
1482
603
245.4
306.6
245.4
595.8
490.8
1.35
1439.1
' 531.1
69.41
127.28
165.97
403.78
46.02
96.16
14.57
3.4
4.67
34.34
10.66
9.85
19.8
52.54
1.04
2.28
0.96
5.69
2.09
3.7
1.8
6.81
0.17
5.95
Cipnd 3
1.43
914.55
344.99
46.69
95.28
195.11
395.69
82.15
9J.72
31.42
5.23
5.48
45.41
12.06
16.85
34.17
94.05
8.87
S.63
1.5
11.9
3.29
5.85
3.62
12.25
0.32
5.5
Cipnd 4
f^ffffMff
3.1
591.14
354.55
55.78
98.91
170.14
327.18
71.49
82.3
20.27
4.27
6.67
56.02
16.46
21.69
32.66
98.08
0.96
5.3
0.88
16.46
2.3
8.01
1.97
19.26
1.13
6.3
TNHHC BMZIM
>***HMJBy
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5974.V
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
5976.2
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
97.8
Cipnd 2
IWSWSU8
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138,5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
.138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
138.5
Ctpod 3 Cipmi 4
ansnani
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
209.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
209.1
200.1
209.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
200.1
290.1
200.1
290.1
200.1
200.1
BXSVUM
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
71.7
A-33
-------
PROJECT 16 (continued)
MET t PROCESS VMIULES
TEMPERATURES
(C)
tab. Air F/C Air Bulk Surfici i«ph) (I)
30
31.1
31.1
23.2
23.2
31.9
31.9
10.3
30.3
26.3
24.3
30.6
30.6
27
27
28.5
28.5
23.3
25.5
20.1
20.1
30
31.9
36.5
33
33
21.5
21.5
37.1
37.1
35
35
20.6
20.6
35.5
35.5
32.1
32.1
31.9
31.9
35
35
27.1
27.1
36.5
37.1
29.75
28.4
28.4
24.1
24.1
22.9
22.9
29
29
25.4
25.4
30.6
30.6
26.8
26. B
24
24
30.3
30.3
19.9
19.9
29.75
7
22.9
S«tt0 Emitting Mastt Soil/Pond Soil
Air Arn VoloM Oipth Typt
(L/iin) fi2) Ii3) <•)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
5
3
5
3
3
3
5
5
3
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
421
90.3
90.3
90.3
90.5
90.5
90.3
90.3
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.3
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.3
90.5
90.5
90.5
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
. Clay
Clay
Clar
Clay
Clay
Clay
day
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay
day
Clay
Clay
Clay
Clay-
Bulk Particli Soil Specific tot
Dmity Density Hoittvt Srivity 1
(q/ct3) (j/ciS) (Kt.I) (oVuS 111
*J"ii"r— •"••
1.01 t.29 5.7J
1.01 2.29 5.73
0.8 2.3 6.7
0.8 2.3 6.7
1.3 2.69 10.53
1.3 2.65 10.53
1.09 2.44 6.07
1.09 2.44 6.07
1.31 2.53 7.34
1.39 2.53 7.34
-
A-34
-------
PROJECT 16 (continued)
Sovci Suoli
Typt Tich.
1 0* F/C
1 F/C
%L _ _,
V F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
• i ft
F/C
F/C
F/C
fft .ffe
F/C
F/C
F/C
P II*
r/C
• »M
F/C
f *M
F/C
P /I*
F/C
F It*
F/C
P /**
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Aria
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
0. T-H Nodil Til lid
l2- B/OTil]
Suol
Point
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
1
2
• • •
TWWC Bmzmt
531,6
162.6
347.8
163.8
400.6
122.4
348
79.2
155.4
73.2
83.4 .
85.8
71.4
265.2
117
10554
3165
828
1591.2
7174.8
17705.4
4273.8
4042.8
743.4
907.8
604.8
5477.4
723.6
1317.6
778.8
3560.4
175.8
345.6
236.4
969.6
488.8
427.8
243.6
972.6
5244.6
4033.2
bond 2
3.5
1.12
7.63
2.14
0.71
0.88
0.74
1.1
888.57
298.93
50.21
100.52
752.73
1314.3
448.93
229.78
16.01
5.12
16.53
184.39
21.61
24.53
14.01
117.25
1.51
3.97
2.3
13.97
11.21
6.85
2.86
13.7
213.1
214.8
bond 3
5.19
1.97
12,58
1.98
1.75
.1.59
1.58
4.12
576.34
171.22
35.73
4 67.67
658.02
887.51
383.19
164.05
24.04
9.41
26.56
173.48
19.67
35.75
23.65
144.85
3.32
7.13
4.35
23.92
22.91
12.04
4.31
22.16
170.3
99.5
•wwirwt ri. auwbC UMb. IU9/9 °r "9/U
bond 4 Time BMZMIO Coond 2 bond 3 Copnd
1.93
1.14
7.45
1.22
1.07
0.88
0.46
,
3.4J
2.43
397.88
165.61
32.06
69.17
520.43
834.91
328.7
182.86
22.12
8.32
2.87
192.44
2?. 15
36.3
21.23
112.13
1.97
5.86
3.49
20.78
18.68
16.01
3.34
23.24
H3A.9 40.5 36.6
1036.9 44.5 36.6
A-35
-------
PROJECT 16 (continued)
NET t PROCESS VARIABLES
TEMPERATURES
*fe.Air F/C Air Bulk
M.3
24.3
30.6
27
28.S
2S.S
20.1
28.6
28.6
23
23
26.9
26.9
31.8
31.8
21
21
23.3
23. 3
24.8
24.8
28.3
28.3
22.1
22.1
35
20.6
3S.S
32.1
31.9
35
27.1
31.3
31.3
23.3
23.3
23.4
23.4
35.1
33.1
23
23
32.3
32.3
31.3
31.3
37.7
37.7
29.8
29.8
1C}
BrimiiU
Surfact Uph) (I)
29
23.4
30.6
26.8
24
30.3
19.9
28.3
28.3
22.1
22.1
28.6
28;6
26.4
26.4
21. 8
21.8
7
29 '
29
27.5
27.5
30.7
30.7
23.8
23.8
SM* Eaitting Hastt Soil /Poo* Soil Bulk Particlt Sail SoKific Rt
Air Arn VoluM Dtftk Typt Dmity Bmity Hoiitvt Gravity
-------
July 1983
PROJECT 17
••••BBI
Source
Type
4
4
4
4
' 4
4
4
4
A
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
»•»»»••»«»
•• Sanple
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
OH F/C
OH F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
OH F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
DH F/C
OH F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
DH F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
DH F/C
OH F/C
DH F/C
immmmmmmmmmmm*
Sample S
Area
100'-60'
100-61
200' -30
200' -90'
Bkgd
800' -90'
500'-60'
650-10'
100'-60'
S1-5'
S1-7.5'
S1-15'
S2-2.5'
S2-4.5'
S2-15'
S2-20'
S2-20'
S3-5'
S3-10'
S3- 15'
S3-20'
S3-30'
M1-5'
M1-10'
N1-15'
N1-25'
H2-10'
N2-20'
ample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
EMISSION
TNHHC Benzene i
1.8 4.7
44 1.8
120 470
7.3 _ 4.3
7.3 7.2
7.3 7.2
7.3 3.6
29 3.6
7.3 11
38
6800
68
36
38
95
38000
380
76
7600
230
600
380
880
200
290
5600
260
RATES (ug/m2-«in) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or ing/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
Cupnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cnpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Cinpncf 2 Cnpnd 3 C«pnd 4 Anfc.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
5.6
7200 2.1
MOO 0.14
5400' 2.9
1900 0.3
1700 . 0.4
2900
160 0.6
460 1.7
460 0.1
160 0.1
160
160 2.5
1700
760
760
1300 1.2
680 1
-------
PROJECT 17 (continued)
U)
00
NET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(•ph) (X) (L/min) (m2) <«3) (9/cm5) (g/cm3> (Ut.X) (hours)
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
~7 0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00316
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
0.00318
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
8496
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
-------
PROJECT 18
CJ
\o
June-Sep
f/C
Source
Type
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
taatoer V
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
?84
Sanple
Area
Pit6, Ell
Pit4, F8
PitJ, 86
arid G2
Pit2, F3
PitS. C7
trnch1,p6
trnch2,p4
trnch3.p7
Bore B-1
Bore B-2
Bore B-3
Bore B-4
Bore B-5
Bore 8-6
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
EMISSION
THC benzene
1800
1200
261
174
131
871
2900
9700
62800
79333
27240
18260
1242.5
42800
471280
RATES (ug/m2-min.)
S02 Onpnd 3 Crrpnd 4
43
22
144
14
22
43
255000
13060
24700
0
3000
1036
0
560740
1890
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC.
THC benzene Cnpnd 2
0.165 2.3
0.42 6.33
1.7
0.55 17.6
0.165 2.3
0.42 6.33
0.016
0.55 17.6
0.2
0.15 3
•
(ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
Cwpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
0.865 0.48 20.7
4.19 2.99 20.7
0.5 20.7
12.5 5 20.7
0.865 0.48
4.19 2.99
0.012
12.5 5 20.7
0.16
1 0.51 22.2
20.7
-------
PROJECT 18 (continued)
US Clouds
(•ph) (X)
8.4
8.4
8.4
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil
Air Area Volume Depth Type
(L/fliin) (m2) («3) (n)
8257.7
4870.5
Bulk Particle Soil Specific
Density Density Moisture Gravity
(Q/c«3) (fl/cm3) (Wt.X) (g/cn3)
Retention
Time
(hours)
8.4 3991.2
5665.7
8.4 3991.2
4251.2
1292.2
7.7 8257.7
8.4 328.8
-------
JMM 1984
Flu Ckutor
Source
Type
3
3
3
1
1
Sup It
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Arta
1-6
B-9
B-9
P-19
P-19
Saaple
Point TNNHC
1
2
3
1
2
45.1
845.6
3986.7
4739.7
17718.4
EMISSION
Benzene
0.15
0.98
0.52
2.9
11.4
PROJECT 19
RATES (ug/«2-iin.)
Cepnd 2 Cipnd 3
8.3 4.3
157.9 38.9
1941.4 768.3
1495 743.1
2823.9 2048.7
Cipnd 4
2.1
32.8
567.9
190.5
606.8
ESZS3CSSS2
SAMPLE
TNNHC
1480
24700
18800
293
262
PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or ig/U
Benzine
13.7
0.474
0.1
Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cipnd 4
2550 0.68
28.2 17 2.15
23.9 5.22 B.47
s»n i ••••inuim.g=ga-u>111..Tr.1r>gl.l3
TEMPERATURES (C)
Aib.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
35
30
30
TA
iO
30
-------
PROJECT 19 (continued)
NET t PROCESS VARIABLES
n.< ^P fr>«'»« ««t. Soil/Port Soil Bulk P»rtieli Soil SpKific Rrtwtion
' * '' BM"ty lmlt» "Bittlirt *"**» Ti-
,|/rt3) (g/c-3) ,|t>1) , J
s
5
S
2369
1484.4
103B.2
1.42
1.4
1.4
4.9
It.B
19.B
2.53
2.38
2.38
5 6270.8 UOB2.&
5 6270.8 11082.4
-------
OJ
April 1984
flux Chamber
Source Sample
Type
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Sample
Sample
PROJECT 20
"••"*-**•— "~~'""™"'sasaE===K===s:=:===========;======:=s=a=s====s:=5!ss====------ - »-— —.—_...
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min. ) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)
Tech. Area Po.nt TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Onpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Onpnd 2 Cn*nd 3 Cnpnd 4 Anfc.Air
================e====================================================--.-...___======^,
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C •
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
01
01
04
06
11
13
15
17
17
background
Well #3
06-6" below
11-6" below
13-6" below
15-6" below
17-6" below
17-6" below
3b
1A
2A
28
3A
4A
5A
6A
6B
4A
. 4B
4B
5B
68
la
1b
2
3
4
5
6
7a
7b
8
9
10
11
12
13
Ha
Hb
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.18 "
2.2—
1.1
4.84
1.1
2.86
2.2
1.1
1.76
1.1
0.44
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.32
6.39
340
328.1
403
3220
153.3
381
462.4
486.7
1800
731.1
365.6
226.8
370
286.3
= «=S========K===MS======-.
TEMPERATURES (C)
F/C Air Bulk Surface
==========s============-=--s
31
44
40.5
38
32
36.5
40
40
38
30
35
-------
PROJECT 20 (continued)
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep 1
US Clouds Air
(mph) (X) (L/min>
===============s========z:
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
7 l:l
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2.
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(m2) (n)3) (9/cm3) (g/cm3) (Wt.X) (g/cm3) (hours)
====================================_===.=.=_.=_=_=.=_====_===_=_====_=_==_=_s==_
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
4180.5
13.4
2
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
8.9
8.9
8.9
13.4
13.4
13.4
8.9
8.9
-------
PROJECT 20 (continued)
Source
Type
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
T 2
i 2
01 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
-,
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
t *r
Sairple
Area
IB
IB
2B
38
48
4 A
SB
68
--IB
28
JB
5A
5*
5A
SB
SB
6A
6*
68
6B
68
4A
4A
4*
48
48
1A
1A
2A
2A
3*
3A
4B
48
5A
SA
6A
A*
Sanpt
Point
29
30
31
12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
/.A
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min.) SAMPLE PT . SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)
e — ...-- -.-.-. ---...-...
TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Cnpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNNHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cnpod 4 Anto.Air
2960
579.2
166
339.1
1610
563.7
792.8
493.3
733.3
581.4
308.3
6100
548.7~
546.1
317.1
205
495.5
228.8
400.8
550.5
162.6
1558
731.1
311.3
365.6
151.1
920.5
715.7
306.1
433.8
409.6
356.7
290.7
444.8
856.6
1090.1
691.5
nv L
TEMPERATURES (C)
F/C Afr Bulk Surface
42
30
40
43
49
39
37
41
37
45
46
46
42
47
50
48
50
45
40
42
40
42
32
42
30
44
40.5
54
41
55
41
46
39
47
-------
PROJECT 20 (continued)
—---"-""
Sweep
WS Clouds Air
(irph) <%) (L/mm)
c============ — = — ==.====
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
1.1
3.2
1.1
3.2
1.1
3.2
3.2
1.1
3.2
77
1.1
3.2
1.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3 ?
i = = =;i = ==== = s ==s==r===========*====:s========s=-- =:=_ == = ===-=
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Emitting Waste Soil/Pood Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(m2) (m) (g/cm3) (g/cm3) (Ut.X) (g/cm3) (hours)
2
2
13. A
13. «
13.4
13.4
8.9
8.9
2
13.4
13.4
8.9
8.9
8.9
8.9
8.9
8.9
6.9
8.9
8.9
8.9
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
2
2
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
8.9
6.9
8.9
8.9
-------
January 1'
Flux Chart
Source
Type
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
984
Oer
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Sample
Area
Grid 04
Grid 06
Grid 06
Grid 08
Grid 08
Grid 08
Grid 14
Grid 15
Grid 19
Grid 23
Grid 25
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
PROJECT 21
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min.) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/8 or mg/L)
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
0.9 7 ?
* .£
- - .— . ^ t K
T^T7 ^* ^ 7 ^
"fc f .C
^BTo 7 o
f -C
^•^T «7 1/ f • C
^^to IM
T _ / » » 7 o
/ .c
^^ £\O 7 5
W • F ^ »W ^ _ £
4*9 2
*i« <\0 8.26
«•» ^^° ^.26
*St* *66 a.26
Amb.Air
8.33
19.44
19.44
5.56
8.69
11.11
7.22
10.56
10.56
10
11.67
TEMPERATURES (C)
8.33
10.56
10.56
A 11
OB 1 1
7 7fl
* • 1 O
835
• •J4
8.33
11.11
10
8.89
9.44
-------
PROJECT 21 (continued)
Sweep
WS Clouds Air
(rnph) (X) (L/min)
2.6
2.6
2.6
5
4.86
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
•
Emitting
Area
29.73
29.73
29.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
27.73
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Waste Soil/Pond Soil
Volume Depth Type
(m)
sand
pine needles/decay
pine needles/decay
moist sand
sand
moist sand
moist sandy soil
moist sand
pine needles
sand
moist sand
Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retent
Density Density Moisture Gravity Timr
(9/cm3) (Wt.X)
-------
November 1983
Flux Charter, Cone.-Prof ile. Transect
PROJECT 23
Source Sample Sample
Type
12
12
12
3
3
12
12
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
12
12
12
12
12
12
Tech. Area
F/C 2 hr.
F/C 50 hr.
F/C 70 hr.
F/C Point 2
F/C Point 10
C/P Run 1
C/P Run 2
C/P Run 3
Transect RI/MetM
Transect R2/Meth1
Transect R3/Meth1
Transect RI/MethZ
Transect R2/Meth2
Transect R3/Meth2
TH Model 2 hr.
TH Model 25 hr.
TH Model 26.5 hr.
TH Model 44 hr.
TH Model 50 hr.
TH Model 70 hr.
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-fflin.)
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
TNMHC Benzene
7248.
607.7
1123
7.69
11
12510
9628
10010
474000
134000
130000
101000
94800
80100
278.7
8.49
11.3
0.92
0.36
136.7
116.2
58.1
•
5820
1650
1600
1240
1160
983
Cmpnd 2
636.3
24.5
40.4
0.146
0.097
604.9
456.1
270.5
14.78
9.16
2752.5
780
757.5
588
551.3
466.5
Cmpnd 3
452.8
29.7
42.3
0.043
0.032
430.05
352.05
286.35
277.8
58.64
1267.5
358.5
348
270
253.5
214.5
SAMPLE
Cmpnd 4 TNMHC
263.8 13.1
20.5 13.1
36.2 13.1
0.041 2.07
0.024 2.07
277.26 13.1
221.76 13.1
255.9 13.1
73.6
42.9
63
74.3
30.14
49.42
994.3 40129.51
282.8
275.1
213.4
199.7
168.8
PT. SOURCE CONC.
Benzene Cmpnd 2
0.05 0.15
0.05 0.15
0.05 0.15
0.028 0.065
0.028 0.065
0.05 0.15
0.05 0.15
0.05 0.15
0.015
0.015
323.78 494.51
(ug/g or ng/L)
Qapnd 3
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.003
0.003
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.625
0.625
105.%
TEMPERATURES (C)
Cmpnd 4 Ant. Air F/C Air
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.045
0.045
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
97.53
21.6
21.6
21.6
24.8
24.8
18.9
18.9
18.9
24.6
24.6
24.6
24.6
24.6
Bulk Surface
25.6
25.6
25.6
27
a»f
27
-------
PROJECT 23(continued)
en
O
US Clouds
(•ph) (X)
9.8
7
6.5
15.17 ~?
15.17
15.17
15.17
15.17
Sweep Emitting
Air Area
(L/rain) (m2)
4.86 557.4
4.86 557.4
4.86 557.4
4.86 185.8
4.86 185.8
557.4
557.4
557.4
185.8
185.8
185.8
185.8
185.8
520
520
520
520
520
520
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(g/cm3) (g/cm3) (ut.X) (g/o>3) (hours)
t.43 30.77
1.43 30 77
1.43 30.77
1.43 30.77
1.43 30.77
1.43 30.77
101.92 0.196
101.92 0.196
101.92 0.196
101.92 0.196
101.92 0.196
101.92 0.196
-------
October 1983
Flux chamber. Vent Sampling
PROJECT 24
====================S========;
=== =========S===S==S===E=*«=«
EMISSION RATES (ug/min)
Source Sample Sample Sample
Type Tech. Area Point TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)
TNMHC Benzene
TEMPERATURES (C)
Ambr
9 Vent
9 Vent
Vent 2
StndPipel
,
2
244 ~
409000
4
40700
s-============================================«=s======«s-=---=_==-
18.3
7100 ,. ,
I
in
TEMPERATURES (C)
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min.) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)'
Source Sample Sample Sample
Type Tech. Area Point TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cirpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
F/C act.landf 1
47
11.3
7.63
22.8
IB
-------
PROJECT 24 (continued)
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
WS Clouds
WS Clouds
Volune Depth Type Density Density Hoi sture Gravity
(X) (n.2, (m3) (m)
20235
20235
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
WS Clouds A.r Area Volune Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Ti«e
<«ph> (X) (L/min) (m2) (ro3) (m) (g/aia) (9/cniJ) (yt %) (g/cmj)
____
/ -------- --------- S -- =
15 2.734 3900 410640 6.5
N)
-------
Septeaber-October 1983
Transect, Flux Chamber, Vent Sampling
PROJECT 25
u>
Source Sample
Type
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
9
9
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
C/P
C/P
C/P
Transect
Transect
Transect
Transect
Sample
Area
Lag 1/Pt 2
Lag 1/Pt 8
Lag 2/Pt 1
Lag 2/Pt 7
Pond 6/R2
Pond 6/R3
Org. Cell
Org. Cell
Flam Cell
Pond 6/R1
Pond 6/R2
Pond 6/R3
Ft am/Met hi
Ft am/Me th2
Tox/Methl
Tox/Meth2
TPH Mode I Lag 1/Pt 2
TPH Model Lag 1/Pt 4
TPH Model Lag 1/Pt 8
T Model
T Model
T Model
T Model
T Model
Vent
Vent
Vent
Lag 2/Pt 1
Lag 2/Pt 7
Pond 6/R1
Pond 6/R2
Pond 6/R3
Drums
land7,v2A
land7,v3-2
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
EMISSION
THMHC Benzene
91.5
145
600
546-
26.4
37.2
154
1260
54.33
1.82
20.98
5.58
43.6
62.2
107
147
354
488
327
170000
50800
52.2
52.4
2.68
33400
1460
13
RATES (ug/m2-min.)
Cmpnd 2
9.94
14.1
67.2
67.3
4.64
4.29
55.1
8.44
7.19
0.798
0.875
0.806
16.88
23.57
15.6
21.4
5.66
9.85
. 7.35
20800
27600
8.33
8.91
0.43
6190
836
7.96
Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
3.06
4.86
9.05 1.78
10.68 2.3
17.8
1.36
2.84
0.177 0.256
0.471 0.269
0.202 0.242
3.01 4.913
4.93 1.28
43.8 7.14
63.3 9.6
14.5
11.9
3.84
13200
758
25.85 2.84
15.9 3.21
0.82 0.16
346
81.1
1.95
SAMPLE
TNMHC
0.413
0.381
168.08
49.99
0.166
0.186
105.3
231
29.08
0.159
0.166
0.186
0.413
0.615
0.381
168.08
49.99
0.159
0.166
0.186
PT. SOURCE CONC.
Benzene Cmpnd 2
0.0196
0.021
23.4
31.04
0.029
0.03
24.83
14.03
2.38
0.026
0.029
0.03
0.0196
0.042
0.0213
23.4
31.04
0.026
0.029
0.03
(ug/g or
C»pnd3
0.0154
0.0096
0.012
0.05
4.53
77.6
15.83
0.01
0.012
0.011
0.0154
0.033
0.0096
11.89
0.679
0.072
0.046
0.05
mg/L)
Cmpnd 4 Anb.Air
XXSSSSSfiSSSSSESSSS
22
22
22.5
22.5
0.046 ' 21.8
0.011 21.8
16.2
16.2
18.6
0.072 • 21
0.046 21
0.05 21
17.5
17.5
12.2
12.2
25.5
25.5
0.01 21.8
0.012 21.8
0.011 . 21.8
IS
15
TEMPERATURES (C)
F/C Air Bulk Surface
BssassassaftcasssssBXCH:ss3:ss
55
£C
75
fcC
7*
£w
22 5
«•*. • j
22.5
15.8 15
15.8 15
16.3 18
22.3
22.3
22.3
16.3
16.3
23
23
22.5
22.5
22.5
12.5 16
12.5 16
-------
I
Sweep
US Clouds Air
(•ph) (X) (L/min)
2.734
2.734
2.734
2.734
3.54
3.54
2.734
2.734
2.734
5.7
5.7
5.7
7
6.6
6.6
7.3
PROJECT 25 (continued)
MET ft PROCESS VARIABLES
Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk
Area Volume Depth Type Density
<"2> (m3) (m) (8/cm3)
1133.4
1133.4
1040.5
1040.5
4905
4905
4160.5
4160.5
2090.3
4905
4905
4905
Particle Soil Specific Retention
Density Moisture Gravity Time
(g/cm3) (Ut.X) (g/cm3) (hours)
1040.5
1040.5
4905
4905
4905
25919 370471.6
25919 370471.6
-------
October
Transec
Source
Type
1
1
1
1
1
1
1983
t
Sample Sample
Tech. Area
Transect RI/Meth 1
Transect Rl/Meth 2
Transect R2/Neth 1
Transect ft2/Meth 2
TPH Model R1 Model
TPH Model R2 Model
Sample
Point
1
2
3
t
1
2
rKVJE,
EMISSION RATES {ug/w2-inin.}
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
551~ 181 126
621 213 157.7
«17 226
601 306
1%5 1002 171.4 125
1965 994 168.8 125
UT M
SAMPLE PT. SOUR
TNMHC Benzene
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
CE CONC.
Cmpnd 2
0.092
0.092
0.092
0.092
0.092
0.092
(ug/g or
Cmpnd 3
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
mg/L)
Cmpnd 4
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.84
TEMPERATURES (C)
Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
13.9
13.9
13.9
13.9
13.9
13.9
Oi
LSI
-------
PROJECT 26 (continued)
US Clouds
Onph) (X)
4.7
4.7
3.5
3.5
4.7
3.5
Sweep Emitting
Air Area
(L/min)
451.5
451.5
451.5
451.5
451.5
451.5
NET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Waste Soil/Pond Soil
Volume Depth Type
On3> (in)
481.7
481.7
481.7
481.7
481.7
481.7
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
.07
Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Density Density Moisture Gravity Ti«e
-------
March - April 1982
PROJECT 27
01
Source
Type
A
A
A
A
A
4
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
f/C
F/C
SanpLe
Area
R5C15
R5C15
R5C15
R5C15
Bkgd
Upper -W
Upper -W
Upper -W
Upper -U
R5C18
R5C15
R5C15
R5C15
R5C15
R5C15
Upper-E
Upper-W
R5C06
RAC06
1C «1
1C *2
Sample
Point
•1
2
3
A
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1A
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
TNMNC
27
160
150
97
110
110
120
2AO
20
38
A5
A6
A6
23
160
2AOO
22
70
25
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min)
Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd A
3.6
" 13
71
A1
1.9
6A
86
1AO
150
31
7.9
15
16
12
31
620
2300
0.31
9
0.31
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)
TMMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd A
20000
20000
20000
20000
350
1200
1200
1200
1200
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
1200
11000
19000
870
TEMPERATURES (C)
Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
20
26
26
26
17
33
33
33
32
20
21
24
25
2A
23
20
23
33
A2
33
31
-------
PROJECT 27 (continued)
in
OD
US Clouds
(mph) (X)
75
25
75
75
25
0
0
0
0
75
-400
/10
10
50
90
90
25
25
0
0
0
NET *
Sweep Emitting Waste
Air Area Volume
(L/min)
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
182.1
0.13
0.13
PROCESS VARIABLES
Soil/Pond Soil Bulk
Depth Type Density
<"» (g/cm3)
sand 1.6
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
sand
.6
.6
.6
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.6
.6
sand 1.6
sand 1.6
sand 1 .6
sand 1 .6
sand 1.4
sand 1.4
Particle Soil
Density Moisture
-------
PROJECT 28
April 1989
Flui Cfcubir
•USSS3S3ZS3BCBSCBXSS3SS3C3S83CS8333SZ
so™ supi. supu s».pi. ™?LR1T™^™™ J^LLTi?OUR?_c?!?:Jl9l9JL'glLL «»«§«»
J2L«!t!LJlL--w? - -TT kolm CK|M| 2 c-fnd 3 ^^4 IWWC •«•• ci»d 2 ^nd J "c-p»"i"« ^77^~'M^s^'^
Ul
\0
I F/C
1 F/C
1 F/C
Zoni 1
Zont 2
ZMI 3
1
2
3
0.0434 0.004
0.2814 0.0083
0.2427 0.0181
406 0
627 0.0027
417 0.0229
0.0033
0.0043
0.0158
0.101 0.0096
0.459 0.0135
0.398 0.0297
340 0
340 0.0044
260 0.0376
«s*g»»SJS^»5
0.0053
0.007
0.02S9
31
35
37
30.7
36
37.6
31.8
30.7
34
-------
PROJECT 28 (continued)
HET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Suctp Emitting HasU Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particli Soil Specific RctMttoo
US Clouds Air Aria VO)UM Depth Typ« Dtnsity Density toisture Bravity Ti«
liph) (I) (L/ain) d2) Ii3) (•) (q/ci3) (g/ci3l (Ht.X) (g/ti3l (hours)
5 50 5 128992
5 80 5 12B992
8 10 5 237984
-------
PROJECT 29
NovMbir 1988
Flux ChubK
cazzscsxzszs
QIISSIOM RATES (ug/i2-»in.» SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or 19/L) *"*j TEHPERATURES (C)
Typt T«ch. Aria Point TNNiC Iwzwtt Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cipnd 4 TNNHC Beniwe Cipnd 2 Cipnd 3 Cipnd 4 Aib.Air F/C Air Bulk Surfici
1
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
I
4
4
4
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Iipingnr
Iipingir
Iipingir
Iipingir
Puf Plug
Put Plug
Puf Plug
Puf Plug
Pond A
North
South
South
Pond A
North
South
South
Pond A
North
Soith
South
• ••••M
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
ggsasasass»gs;s5
0.63
36
36
nzzzxsszz:
240
410
5000
4600
«k=355SS5«
120
32
55
170
25
30
50
140
ES3SS3SS5SS5S
0.006
0.36
0.36
1.2
0.68
8.6
7.9
nus5=c:xx=x=s===»X33XzaKi:
0.23 0.065
0.25 0.17.
0.77 0.43
1.4 0.68
130
1590
46200
89300
0
16
32.1
32.1
2.95
5.9
295
715
0.4
' 4.2
13.5
11.2
2. OS
4.1
205
510
0
2.2
3.2
0
-------
PROJECT 29 (continued)
NET * PROCESS VARIABLES
Sueep Eeitting Haste
Air Area Voluu
(L/ain) (a2) (e3)
Sail/Pond Sail Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
US Clouds Air Area Voluu Depth Type Deniity Deniity Moisture Gravity Tin
feph) (1) (L/ain) (a2) (e3) (e) (g/»3) (g/u3) (W.I) (g/cs31 (hours)
asss3saas=ssssssasasssasa=ssasssasasassas=asaass3saaaaasssaaaasasasSsasaBSBS«ssss««s«aa«ess«Ba»«asssa3Baas=
5 17148 18925
5 Dry
S Hoist
5 Moist
17UB 1B92S
171i8 1B92S
-------
PROJECT 33
December
1989
Flux Chamber
Source
Type
4
4
4
4
4
*
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Sample
Area
PGE53
PGES2
PGES1
PGE56
PGE55
PGE60
PCE57
PCE59
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1NMHC
1.8
4000
.6.3
2000
2500
2400
9.2
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min.) SAMPLE PT SOURCE roue run/o „- „ *
a«nruc ri. sujKLt tone, (ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 ^4 TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Cnpnd 3 C^pnd 4 A«b Air F/C Air Bulk Surface"
0.31 0.067
86 45
0-16 0.1 0.1 0.12
39 25 0.81
1.3 32 29 1
3.2 25 12 0.27
0-036 0.26 0.14
u>
-------
PROJECT 33 (continued)
MET t PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type
(mph) (X) (L/min) (m2) (m)
Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(g/cm3> (Wt.X) (g/co3) (hours)
ZZXZEESEZZEEEEZZSEEZEEZZZESEZSEEZSZSESZESSESSSEZSSZZZZEESZEESSSSBSSSCZSSSSSSZ
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
-------
PROJECT 36
July 198"
Flux Chat
Source
Type
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
?
nber
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
-Sample
Area
Seam *3
Seam #6
Seam #11
Sean #16
Seam #27
Seam #28J
Seam #29
Seam #45
Seam #50
Seam #53
Seam #58
Port #2
Port #3
Port # 6
46 uncon.
#6 Modif.
Samolfi
"•"•T***
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
?
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
-
(ug/min)
EMISSION RATES FROM SEAMS AND PORTS SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES (C)
TMMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Crapnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Amb.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
930.11
16.54-
81.64
103.35
16.54
19635.79
1550.19
10.33
1550.19
29.97
56840.44
21420
15435
31500
5985
-------
PROJECT 36 (continued)
MET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep fitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle "Soil Specific Retention
WS Clouds A.r Area Volune Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time '
(i«ph) (X) (L/min) (Ut.X)
»»««»===ss===s!:==B=====S:a:ss:-.!--I.-1.=J!.._s.._s._...JB_S].s.___ss___.s__s__________a_____a_sa=s
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
S 0.13
-7 5 0.13
' 5 0.13
5 0.13
S 0.13
5 0.13
5 0.13
-------
PROJECT 37
July- August 1989
flux Chamber
Source
Type
6
6
6
6
6
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
Sample
Area
inlet o/w
inlet/oil
inlet/aqu
non-nixed
non-nixed
Point
1
2
3
4
5
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min. ) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L) TEMPERATURES
TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Onpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 TNMHC Benzene Cnpnd 2 Copnd 3 Cnpnd 4 Anfc'.Air F/C Air Bulk Surface
5086.11
3729.82
1831
1356.3
745.96
ON
-------
PROJECT 37 (continued)
us
(mph)
Sweep
Clouds Air
«) (L/min)
5
5
5
5
5
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil
Area Volume Depth Type
-------
November
1987
Flux Chamber
Source
Type
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Sunn 1
wCnl^Jl
Tech
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F./C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
A ^jmmL A
C danfji «
Area
R3, crush 1
R3, convey
R3,crsh#2
vnt stor 1
vnt stor 4
non-vent 1
non-vent 4
surf. rip 1
surf. rip 2
surf .rip 4
surf. rip 4
site #2
site #3
'site #1
site#4
site #5
site #6
site #13
site #7
site #9
site #8
site #10
site #11
fresh rip
#16,25 min
#16,4.61hr
#4,56 min
#5,30 min
#5,5.1hr
#5,2 days
#5, 95 days
fresh rip
aft. 25min
1 hr 32min
2 hr 6 min
2 hr 40min
3 hr 6 min
3 hr 38min
4 hr 37min
site7,pit2
site9,pit2
siteS, pi t2
site10pit2
site11pit1
site #12
PROJECT 45
Siuml **
^Qlt^J v *T
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
• 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
EMISSION RATES
TNMNC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
60600
51600
103000
15070
3014
1830
1292
70900
51800
90900
64800
308
360
2190
328
153
29.4
19300
268
3670
15.8
823
341
75500
8620
5580
25100
22500
7150
2440
1440
13300
7730
5300
4610
6920
5420
6110
2880
305
2670
1830
671
483
159
A-69
-------
PROJECT 45 (continued)
"*********mmm*mmmm*mmm*mmmmm**mmmmm*mmmm*
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or mg/L)
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Arab. Air
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.4
6263 !2
15
17
15
12
12
15
12
20
15
22
15
13
A-7C 11
•"•"•» •• » * warn HMXXM
TEMPERATURES (C>
F/C Air Bulk
•—•"—-——
13
17
20
16
15
15
15
14
33
19
33
20
14
9
Surface
zzzzzxzza
"
13
17
18
16
16
16
15
16
31
15
21
20
14
8
-------
PROJECT 45 (Continued)
US Clouds
(mph) (X)
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7 •
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.77
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
..„.„.„„,„,., ™«»««M»««M««M»«M»««M««««,se,,M,,M,MaMMmMmMMMMMMjis
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Tine
a/min) (g/cm5) Cg/cm3> (Wt.X)
-------
November
F/C, AID
Source
Type
xusznxi
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
1987
Sample
Tech.
i********
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C -
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
SAiml £
Area
rip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
Pip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
rip aftld
pip aftld
pip aftld
pip aftld
pip aftld
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrape2d
scrapeZd
scrap«2d
scrapeZd
scrape2d
scrap«2d
Cjuw
PROJECT 45A
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-min)
Point TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
rHXX3X««XXX_XXSX*»*zrx**»«;H«*«<— ••*__..«_.____—__
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-16
17
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1.836+10
2.206+10
2.396+10
2.616+10
2.826+10
2.926+10
3.026+10
• 3.156+10
3.296+10
3.396+10
3.556+10
3.736+10
3.826+10
3.97E+10
4.07E+10
4.146+10 —
4.276+10
4.436+10
1.836+10
1.886+10
3.09E+10
3.296+10
3.456+10
3.666+10
3.826+10
4.006+10
4.10E+10
4.18E+10
4.24E+10
4.37E+10
4.466+10
1.786+09
2.296+09
2.676+09
2.936+09
3.18E+09
3.446+09
3.566+09
3.566+09
3.696+09
4.016+09
4.336+09
4.756+09
5.096+09
5.346+09
A-72
-------
PROJECT 45A(continued)
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC.
-------
PROJECT 45A (continued)
MET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
US Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Tine
(mph) (X) (L/min) (m2) (m3) (m)
-------
PROJECT 45A (continued)
fiOUf* C"*
0VWI WC
Type
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Cjuiinl *
Tech.
B88XWM3
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
«___! _
Area
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
"Vscrape2d
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
scrapeZd
Ssmrtlf
aon^jic
Point
15
16
17
18
19
ZO
Z1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-niin)
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Oipnd 4
6.11E+09
6.62E+09
7. 12E+09
7.63E+09
7.63E+09
8.02E+09
8.78E+09
9.29E*09
1.01E+10
1.07E+10
1.12E+10
1.23E+10
1.31E+TT}-
1.33E*10
1.78E+09
3.18E+09
3.52E+09
3.73E+09
4.33E+09
4.84E+09
5.09E*09
5.34E+09 ,
6.11E+09
6.62E+09
7.38E*09
7.83E*09
8.21E+09
8.86E+09
9.9ZE+09
1.07E+10
1.1ZE*10
1.Z3E*10
1.33E+10
1.35E+10
A-75
-------
PROJECT 45A (continued)
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC.
-------
PROJECT 4SA (continued)
•^••••••••M»x*««a»x*ax*nBxvxxx*xa
MET & PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
WS Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(mph) (X) (L/min) (m2) (m)
-------
•vj
oo
Aujust 1989
Flux ChMber
Source
Type
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
, 3
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Sample
Tech.
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
F/C
f/C
Sample
Area
gas/43aft
gas/101
gas/233
gas/ 1290
dies/60
dies/115
dies/400
dies/1450
gas/79
gas/112
gas/317
gas/ 1380
gas/35
gas/ 120
gas/328
smp/58
snip/116
•unp/169
sunp/1291
crud/51
crud/117
crud/292
crud/1380
gas/64
gas/ 133
gas/283
gas/ 1337
gas/82
gas/161
gas/233
Sample
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
PROJECT 49
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-win. )
THHHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4
169283.5
113354.6
18715.5
6237
84188.2
98884.8
30989.9
11648.4
11417.1
44756.7
21065.2
4227.1
25719.1
657.7
1594.8
120612.2
74390.4
48807.4
41186.9
18221.1
18107.7
16275.2
7076.2
110633
82827.4
12659.9
2509.3
1106.8
836.4
519.8
SAMPLE PT. SOURCE CONC. (ug/g or ng/L)
TNMHC Benzene Cmpnd 2 Cmpnd 3 Cmpnd 4 Arab. Air
35.6
34.4
28.4
29.3
31.9
33.5
31.4
28.5
36.3
36.9
28.9
31.8
28.9
29.6
26.8
32
29.5
25.4
30.3
33.3
33.7
31.6
32.5
33.4
33.4
25.2
33.6
32.4
32
34 8
TEMPERATURES (C)
F/C Air Bulk
46
45.7
27.9
45.3
48.3
48
35.8
53.9
45.8
45.9
27.5
50.5
41.7
42.5
26.5
38.1
32.4
23.5
46.3
44.7
47.8
40,1
55.9
42.6
40.8
24.2
53.1
48.7
51.3
48.1
Surface
34
34
29.3
25
28.1
30.3
34.7
30.6
34.3
40.6
27.9
38.4
25.4
26.6
28
24.3
26.3
25.1
30.9
32.2
32.4
33.2
30.4
30.4
32
29.1
31.3
27.3
31.7
?o •>
-------
PROJECT 49 (continued)
VO
Sweep
US Clouds Air
(nph) (X) (L/«in)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
c
MET I PROCESS VARIABLES
Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Tine
(•2) <«3) (m) (8/c«3) (Ut.X) (g/c*3) (hours)
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0..13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
n.13
-------
PROJECT 51
March 1982
Concentration-Profile
Source
Type
6
7
6
7
Sample "Sample
Tech. Area
C-P
C-P
T/H Model
T/H Model
fB
TB
FB
TB
Sample
WUH^-T » *.
Point
1
2
1
2
EMISSION RATES (ug/m2-nin.) SAMPLE PT. SOURCE COMC. (mg/L) TEMPERATURES
-------
PROJECT 51 (continued)
MET ft PROCESS VARIABLES
Sweep Emitting Waste Soil/Pond Soil Bulk Particle Soil Specific Retention
WS Clouds Air Area Volume Depth Type Density Density Moisture Gravity Time
(mph) (X) (L/min)
------- |