EPA-450/3-91-016 V.5
NATIONAL MIR TOXICS
INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE
SERA
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
              State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
              Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials
          Bibliography of
      Selected Reports and
     Federal Register Notices
       Related to Air Toxics

   Volume 5: Citations -1991

             July 1991

-------
DCN No. 91-203-099-37-06
EPA Contract No. 68-D8-0065
Work Assignment No. 3-7
EPA-450/3-91-016
                NATIONAL AIR TOXICS INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE:

                     BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SELECTED REPORTS AND

                FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES RELATED TO AIR TOXICS

                         VOLUME  5:  CITATIONS  -  1991
                                 FINAL REPORT
                                Prepared for:

                     Nancy Riley,  Work Assignment Manager
                         Emission Standards Division
                 Office  of Air Quality Planning  and Standards
                    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711
                                 Prepared  by:

                                Carol  A.  Owen
                               Linda Y.  Cooper
                                 Lisa C. Huff
                              V.  Janet McDonald
                               Joan S. McLean
                             Radian Corporation
                 3200 East Chapel Hill Road/Progress Center
                            Post  Office  Box 13000
                Research
                          Begion 5,  Liorcr"
                          230 S. Dearbcr.-i  :..
                                  July 1991

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

      This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication
as received from Radian Corporation.  Approval  does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       ii

-------
                                    PREFACE

      In response to State and local agency requests for air toxics
information and to support these agencies  in their air pollution control
efforts, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has developed an
information dissemination center, known as the National Air Toxics Information
Clearinghouse  (NATICH).  The design and implementation of the Clearinghouse
has been conducted in close coordination with the State and Territorial Air
Pollution Program Administrators (STAPPA)  and the Association of Local Air
Pollution Control Officials (ALAPCO).
      The purpose of this bibliography is  to provide State and local agencies
with citations of reports and Federal Register notices useful in developing
and operating  air toxics control programs.  The reports selected for this
bibliography were published by the following agencies:  U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), National Academy  of Sciences (NAS), National Cancer
Institute (NCI), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
including the National Toxicology Program  (NTP), National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR), Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC), and
World Health Organization (WHO) including  the International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC).  Relevant reports published by various State and
local agencies are also included in this edition.  This edition of the
bibliography updates the cumulative bibliography previously published by the
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse, Bibliography of Selected
Reports and Federal Register Notices Related to Air Toxics, five volumes:
Volume 1:  Citations (July 1987); Volume 2:  Citations - 1988 (July 1988);
Volume 3:  Citations - 1989 (July 1989); Volume 4:  Citations - 1990
(July 1990); and Index - 1990 (July 1990).  The citations selected this year
were compiled from sources available through January 31, 1991.
      The Clearinghouse plans to continue to update this bibliography on a
regular basis.  Other publications of the Clearinghouse include:

            National  Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Rationale for Air
            Toxics Control in Seven State and Local  Agencies,
            EPA-450/5-86-005,  PB86-181179/AS, August 1985;
            National  Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  How The
            Clearinghouse Can Help to Answer Your Air Toxics Questions,
            EPA-450/5-86-009,  PB88-157813/XAB, July 1986;
                                      iii

-------
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Methods for
Pollutant Selection and Prioritization, EPA-450/5-86-010,
PB87-124079/XAB, July 1986;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Qualitative and
Quantitative Cancer Risk Assessment, EPA-450/5-87-003,
PB88-113188/XAB, June 1987;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Bibliography of
Selected Reports and Federal Register Notices Related to Air
Toxics Volume 1:  Citations - 1987, EPA-450/5-87-005,
PB88-136601/REB, July 1987, Volume 2:  Citations - 1988,
EPA-450/5-88-005, PB89-103436/REB, July 1988; Volume 3:
Citations - 1989, EPA-450/3-89-25, PB90-270570/REB; Volume 4:
Citations - 1990, EPA-450/3-90-014, PB91-168435/XAB, July 1990;
Volume 5:  Citations - 1991, EPA-450/3-91-016, NTIS number not yet
available; and Index - 1991, EPA-450/3-91-017, NTIS number not yet
available, July 1991;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  NATICH Data Base
Users Guide for Data Entry and Editing, EPA-450/5-88-001,
PB88-202734/XAB, February 1988;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  NATICH Data Base
Users Guide for Data Viewing, EPA-450/5-88-002,  PB88-197470/XAB,
February 1988;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Case Studies in
Risk Communication, EPA-450/5-88-003, PB89-104277/XAB, May 1988;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  NATICH Data Base
Report on State, Local,  and EPA Air Toxics Activities,
EPA-450/3-91-018, NTIS number not yet available, September 1991;
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse Newsletter, a
bimonthly periodical,  39 issues to date,  December 1983 - May 1991;
and
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  Ongoing Research
and Regulatory Development Projects, EPA-450/3-91-015, NTIS number
not yet available,  July 1991.
                          IV

-------
                                   ABSTRACT

      The National Air Toxics  Information Clearinghouse has been established
by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards for the purpose of facilitating information transfer
among Federal, State, and local air quality management agencies.  This
document has been published as part of that effort.  The purpose is to provide
State and local agencies and other Clearinghouse users with bibliographic
citations of reports and Federal Register notices useful in developing and
operating air toxics control programs.  The reports selected for this
bibliography were published by the following agencies:  U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, National Academy of Sciences, National Cancer Institute,
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences including the National
Toxicology Program, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Consumer Products Safety
Commission, and World Health Organization including the International Agency
for Research on Cancer.  Also included are reports published by various State
and local agencies that they submit directly to the data base.
      The bibliography is published in five volumes plus an index.  Volume 1
(EPA-450/5-87-005, PB88-136601/REB) contains cumulative citations from before
1974 through March 1987, and Volume 2 (EPA-450/5-88-005, PB89-103436/REB), the
citations from April 1987 through March 1988.  Volume 3 (EPA-450/3-89-25,
PB90-270570/REB) has citations from April 1988 through January 1989, and
Volume 4 (EPA-450/3-90-014, PB91-168435/XAB) has citations from January 1989
to January 1990.  Volume 5 has the more recent citations from January 1990 to
January 1991.  This volume consists of two sections.  Section 1 includes
introductory material describing the bibliography scope and organization and
contains information necessary for the proper use of the document.  This part
updates the corresponding part in Volumes 1, 2, 3, and 4.  Volume 5, Section 2
contains the report and Federal Register notice entries with bibliographic
information and, in most cases, an abstract.  The current index to the
bibliography (Index - 1991, EPA-450/3-91-017) covers all the reports from 1974
to the present.  Each listing indicates which of the five volumes contains the
citation.  The index is organized by document type; by pollutant class,  name,
or Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number;  by Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) Code; and by sponsoring agency.
      This document was submitted in partial fulfillment of EPA Contract No.
68-D8-0065, Work Assignment No. 3-7, by Radian Corporation under the
sponsorship of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.   This edition of the
bibliography updates previous bibliographies published by the National Air

-------
Toxics Information Clearinghouse.  The Clearinghouse will  continue to publish
regular updates in separate volumes, consecutively numbered.   Each year, a new
cumulative index will be published that expands and replaces  the previous
year's edition.  The 1991 index allows users to identify publications of
interest in Volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.  With distribution of the 1991 Index,
EPA encourages users to recycle the 1990 Index.
                                      VI

-------
                               TABLE OF  CONTENTS
Section                                                                   Page
Volume 1:  Citations - 1974 to 1987
  1.0    Introduction	    1
         1.1   Document Scope  	    1
         1.2   Organization of Document 	    4
         1.3   Ordering Information  	   12
  2.0    Report and Federal Register Notice Entries 	   25
Volume 2:  Citations - 1988
  1.0    Introduction 	    1
         1.1   Document Scope  	    1
         1.2   Organization of Document 	    5
         1.3   Ordering Information  	   13
  2.0    Report and Federal Register Notice Entries 	   25
Volume 3:  Citations - 1989
  1.0    Introduction 	    1
         1.1   Document Scope  	    1
         1.2   Organization of Document 	    5
         1.3   Ordering Information  	   14
  2.0    Report and Federal Register Notice Entries 	   27
  Appendix A - Index to the Clearinghouse Newsletters 	  A-l
Volume 4:  Citations - 1990
  1.0    Introduction	1-1
         1.1   Document Scope	1-1
         1.2   Organization of Document 	  1-4
         1.3   Ordering Information	1-12
  2.0    Report and Federal Register Notice Entries 	  2-1
  Appendix A - Index to the Clearinghouse Newsletters 	  A-l
                                     Vll

-------
                         TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (Continued)

Section                                                                   paqe
Volume 5:  Citations - 1991
  1.0    Introduction	  j.j
         1.1   Document Scope	1-1
         1.2   Organization of Document	1-4
         1.3   Ordering Information	1-12
  2.0    Report and Federal Register Notice Entries ...  	  2-1
  Appendix A - Index to the Clearinghouse Newsletters 	  A-l

Index
  1.0    Guides to the Index	  1-1
         1.1   User's Guide to  the Index	1-3
         1.2   Guide to Terminology for Identification  Codes  	  1-4
  2.0    Index to Report and Federal  Register Notice Entries  	  2-1
                                     vm

-------
                          LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Table                                                                     Page
  1      List of EPA Offices Contacted	   1-3
  2      Clearinghouse Chemical Identifiers 	   1-8
  3      List of Acronyms	1-10
  4      Key to Document Types	1-11
  5      1991 NTIS Price Schedule	1-14

Figure
  1      Sample Entries 	   1-6
                                      IX

-------
                               1.0  INTRODUCTION

      This bibliography has been developed by the National Air Toxics
Information Clearinghouse, operated by the Pollutant Assessment Branch of the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS).  A total of 157 bibliographic citations to reports and
Federal Register notices related to toxic air pollutants are included.  To
facilitate the use of this bibliography, citations are indexed by document
type, chemical name or class and Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number,
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code, and sponsoring agency.
      Like other Clearinghouse publications, the bibliography is designed to
help Clearinghouse users identify sources of information for specific air
toxics questions or problems.  This edition of the bibliography announces 150
new reports and Federal Register notices.
      The information contained in this bibliography is also available through
the National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse on-line data base - NATICH.
For more information about accessing NATICH, contact the Clearinghouse staff
at (919) 541-0850, (FTS) 629-0850.

1.1   DOCUMENT SCOPE

      This bibliography contains a selected list of reports and Federal
Register notices that have been identified as being useful to State and local
agencies developing and operating air toxics control programs.  The reports
were published by the following agencies:  EPA, National Academy of Sciences
(NAS), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences (NIEHS) including National Toxicology Program (NTP), National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Agency for Toxic
Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Consumer Products Safety Commission
(CPSC), and the World Health Organization (WHO) including the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).  Reports published by State and local
agencies are also included.
      The citations include documents of the following types:
      •     Accident prevention/emergency response
      •     Ambient monitoring
      •     Case studies (used only by State and local  agencies)
      •     Chemical Hazard Information Profile (CHIP,  used only by EPA)
      •     Clean Air Act Title III guidance/documents
      •     Control program support (used only by State and local  agencies)

                                      1-1

-------
      •     Control technology
      •     Dispersion modeling
      •     Emission factor documents
      •     Epidemiological studies
      •     Exposure assessments
      •     Federal Register notices
      •     Health assessments
      •     Indoor air
      •     National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants  (NESHAP,
            used only by EPA)
      •     New Source Performance Standards (NSPS, used only by EPA)
      •     Pollution prevention
      •     Pre-regulatory assessments
      •     Regulatory development guidance
      •     Risk assessments
      •     Rules and regulations (used only by State and local agencies)
      •     Source assessments
      •     Source sampling
      •     Toxicity testing

      This year's literature search included citations for Clean Air Act
Title III guidance/documents, but no were identified.  Citations were selected
within each document type according to their relevance to air toxics work.
The background information documents for new source performance standards
(NSPS) were included in this bibliography because, although their focus is on
control of criteria air pollutants, they also contain valuable information on
the sources and control of noncriteria, potentially toxic air pollutants.  The
Federal Register notices include the Agency's announcements regarding Sections
111 and 112 of the Clean Air Act dealing with the NSPS and the national
emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) programs,
respectively.  The notices also include proposed guidelines concerning health,
exposure, and risk assessments issued by the Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment (OHEA).
      Citations for each of these topic areas were compiled by searching
published lists of EPA reports, such as the EPA Publications Bibliography and
the ORD Publications Announcement.  These citations were supplemented by
contacting the EPA office currently conducting that particular type of work.
The EPA offices contacted are listed in Table 1.
                                      1-2

-------
                   TABLE 1.  LIST OF EPA OFFICES CONTACTED
Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)
      Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
      Office of Atmospheric and Indoor Air Programs (OAIAP)
      Office of Mobile Sources (QMS)
      Office of Radiation Programs (ORP)

Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPTS)
      Office of Toxic Substances (OTS)
      Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP)

Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (OPPE)
      Office of Pollution Prevention (OPP)

Office of Research and Development (ORD)
      Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (OHEA)
      Office of Health Research (OHR)
      Office of Environmental  Engineering and Technology Demonstration (OEETD)
      Office of Modeling, Monitoring Systems and Quality Assurance (OMMSQA)

Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
      Office of Solid Waste (OSW)
      Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)

Office of Water (OW)
      Office of Science and Technology (OST)

  Not all  divisions  or laboratories are contacted.
                                      1-3

-------
      Abstracts for the EPA reports were obtained from the EPA Publications
Bibliography, the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) data base, or
the technical data sheet included in the report.  Abstracts for the Federal
Register notices were prepared from the Summary and Supplementary Information
sections of each notice.
      Citations to reports from the eight other sponsoring agencies (NAS,
NIEHS, NTP, NIOSH, ATSDR, CPSC, and WHO) included in this bibliography focus
on health, risk, exposure assessments,  toxicity testing, and epidemiology
studies.  Most documents discuss one or more potentially toxic chemicals, and
a few emphasize exposure to toxic substances in a particular industry.
Although ambient air exposure was the primary area of interest, reports on
occupational exposure and exposure via drinking water were also included.
      The research of the National Institute of Environmental  Health Sciences
(NIEHS) is included in a single citation by reference to the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Bibliography 1966-1989 (most
current edition as of Mav 1991).  The research results are generally published
in technical journal  articles, conference papers, and books.   These types of
publications were outside the scope of the bibliography.
      Citations to reports from each of the eight agencies on  the topics of
risk and exposure assessments and health effects were compiled from agency
catalogs.  Abstracts  were obtained from each of these sources  when available.
      In addition to  reports by EPA and the eight other agencies,  this
bibliography includes citations to relevant reports published  by State and
local  agencies.  These citations are submitted by the agencies directly to the
Clearinghouse and are available from these agencies.
      This document also contains an index to the National  Air Toxics
Information Clearinghouse Newsletter.  The Newsletter is currently published
bimonthly by the Clearinghouse to inform readers of current issues relating to
toxic air pollutants.  Articles discuss activities at the Federal, State, and
local  levels.

1.2   ORGANIZATION OF DOCUMENT

      This document has been published  in five volumes and an  index.  Volume 1
(EPA-450/5-87-005, PB88-136601/REB) contains cumulative citations  from before
1974 through March 1987, Volume 2 (EPA-450/5-88-005, PB89-103436/REB)  the
citations from April  1987 through March 1988.  Volume 3 (EPA-450/3-89-25,
PB90-270570/REB) has  citations from April 1988 through January 1989 and
Volume 4 (EPA-450/3-90-014, PB91-168435/XAB) has citations from January 1989
to January 1990.  Volume 5 has the more recent citations from  January  1990 to
January 1991.  This volume consists of two sections.  Section  1 is the

                                     1-4

-------
introductory material discussing scope and organization.  It also contains
explanatory information necessary for the proper use of the bibliography, such
as keys to agency and office abbreviations and two sample bibliographic
entries, as well as ordering information for reports by EPA and the other
agencies.  Section 2 of Volume 5 contains the report and Federal Register
notice entries with bibliographic information and, in most cases, an abstract.
The report entries are arranged by document order number.  Figure 1 explains
each line of two sample entries.  Each entry has been assigned certain key
words or descriptors pertaining to document type, pollutant, source whenever
an SIC Code applies, and sponsoring agency.  These descriptors are used to
generate the index and to give users several ways to access reports of
interest.  The Newsletter index also appears in Volume 5 as an appendix.
      The current index (Index - 1991, EPA-450/3-91-017) enables users to
identify reports of interest in Volumes 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 (the volume number in
parentheses will appear immediately preceding the publication number).
Index categories include document type, pollutant class or name and CAS
number, SIC Code and the corresponding title, and sponsoring agency.  Groups
of chemicals or pollutants such as "organic compounds" that could not be
identified more precisely by individual chemical names were assigned unique
Clearinghouse identifiers in the place of CAS numbers.  A list of these
identifiers is found in Table 2.  A key to the international and
national sponsoring agency acronyms appears in Table 3.  Table 4 lists the
document types and their abbreviations.  A table of contents to the index is
found at the beginning of the index.  This table of contents consists of an
alphabetic and numeric list of all  descriptors, along with their corresponding
page numbers in the index.  These descriptors, or index terms, represent
subject headings that describe the content of a document.
      A second series of key words allows users to identify specific State
agency reports.  Each agency has a unique four-place alphanumeric code by
which it is indexed, for example, the South Coast Air Quality Management
District in California is CA03.  Because Federal agency key words are already
in use, a generic keyword EPA has been assigned.  Although this term appears
in the keyword list following the relevant citation, it is not used for
indexing.
      This bibliography is updated regularly by the National Air Toxics
Information Clearinghouse.  In the next update, the Clearinghouse will publish
abstracts only for the newly identified reports and Federal  Register notices,
but will publish a cumulative index to all citations (Volumes 1, 2,  3, 4,
and 5) for use after July 1991.
                                      1-5

-------
                           FIGURE 1.   SAMPLE ENTRIES


      Report entries are arranged alphanumerically by document order number.

A sample entry follows:

PB84-156157
Demonstration of Remedial Techniques Against Radon in Houses on Florida
Phosphate Lands
EPA, Montgomery, AL, ORP/EERF
July 1983, 195p, EPA-520/5-83-009, PC A09/MF A01

Abstract:  This report is to document the results of an activity which forms
part of a program intended to demonstrate means of controlling indoor radon
levels in structures built on Florida phosphate lands.  The natural radon
content of the soil is elevated in some parts of the Florida phosphate lands,
resulting in elevated radon concentrations in the soil gas.  If building
construction is such as to provide pathways, or routes or entry, between the
interior of the building and the soil below, then this radon-bearing soil gas
may enter the building and result in elevated indoor levels.  This report
therefore documents a review of current building practices, with the intention
of identifying routes of entry.  Based upon this knowledge, certain
modifications to building practices may be seen as a means of reducing indoor
radon levels.

CL-PHOSPHA  PHOSPHATES
CT          CONTROL TECHNOLOGY DOCUMENT
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON
14          NONMETALLIC MINERALS, EXCEPT FUELS
147         CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER MINERALS
1475        PHOSPHATE ROCK
52          BUILDING MATERIALS AND GARDEN SUPPLIES
7440-61-1   URANIUM
                                     1-6

-------
                     FIGURE 1.   SAMPLE ENTRIES (Continued)


A sample Federal Register notice entry follows:

45 FR 83952 12-19-80
Benzene Emissions from Benzene Storage Vessels; National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants; Hearing
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS

Abstract:  Proposed rule and notice of public hearing.  The proposed standard
would limit benzene emissions from each new and existing storage vessel with a
capacity greater than 4 cubic meters used to store pure benzene.  The notice
describes proposed requirements for fixed/floating roofs, primary and
secondary seals, and inspection procedures.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
NESHAP      NAT'L EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
34          FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS
344         FABRICATED STRUCTURAL METAL PRODUCTS
3443        FABRICATED PLATE WORK (BOILER SHOPS)
71-43-2     BENZENE
                                     1-7

-------
              TABLE 2.  CLEARINGHOUSE CHEMICAL IDENTIFIERS
Clearinghouse
         Pollutant
   CL-ABRAS
   CL-ACID
   CL-ADIP
   CL-ALDEHYD
   CL-ALKYLPB
   CL-ALLERG
   CL-ALMERC
   CL-ALUM
   CL-AMINE
   CL-AROMHC
   CL-BACT
   CL-BROM
   CL-BTX
   CL-CADMIUM
   CL-CARBON
   CL-CARCIN
   CL-CFC
   CL-CHC
   CL-CHLOR
   CL-CHROME
   CL-COE
   CL-CONSUMR
   CL-COPPER
   CL-COTDUST
   CL-CREOSOL
   CL-CUTFLU
   CL-DGAEA
   CL-DIESEL
   CL-DIISOCY
   CL-DIOXIN
   CL-DYE
   CL-ETHERS
   CL-ETS
   CL-EXPLO
   CL-FUELOIL
   CL-FUNG
   CL-FURAN
   CL-GLASS
   CL-HALOGHC
   CL-HALOME
   CL-HAPS
   CL-HAZWAST
   CL-HCARB
   CL-HERB
   CL-HEXANE
   CL-IAP
   CL-INMERC
   CL-INORGAN
   CL-INOTIN
   CL-INSMOLY
   CL-INSRHOD
   CL-INSTUNG
   CL-IRON
   CL-MANG
 Abrasives
 Acidic  compounds
 Adipates
 Aldehydes
 Alkyl lead  compounds
 Allergens
 Alkyl mercury  compounds
 Aluminum  compounds
 Amines
 Aromatic  hydrocarbons
 Bacteria
 Bromine compounds
 Benzene,  toluene, xylene
 Cadmium compounds
 Total carbon
 Carcinogens
 Chlorofluorocarbons
 Chlorinated hydrocarbons
 Chlorine  compounds
 Chromium  compounds
 Coke oven emissions
 Consumer  products
 Copper compounds
 Cotton dust
 Creosols
 Cutting fluids
 Diethylene glycol alkyl ethers and acetates
 Diesel fuel emissions
 Diisocyanates
 Dioxins
 Dyes
 Ethers
 Environmental tobacco smoke
 Explosives
 Waste derived fuel oil emissions
 Fungicides
 Furans
 Fibrous glass dust
 Halogenated hydrocarbons
 Halomethanes
 Title III hazardous air pollutants
 Hazardous wastes
 Hydrocarbons
 Herbicides
 Hexane isomers
 Indoor air pollutants
 Aryl and inorganic mercury compounds
 Inorganic compounds
 Inorganic tin and oxide compounds
 Insoluble molybdenum compounds
 Insoluble rhodium compounds
 Insoluble tungsten compounds
 Iron compounds
Manganese compounds
                                  1-8

-------
        TABLE 2.  CLEARINGHOUSE CHEMICAL IDENTIFIERS (Continued)
Clearinghouse #
        Pollutant
   CL-MAPP
   CL-METAL
   CL-METOXBZ
   CL-MINDUST
   CL-MINFIB
   CL-MOM
   CL-MS
   CL-NICKEL
   CL-NITRATE
   CL-NITRITE
   CL-NITROSO
   CL-NMHC
   CL-ODOR
   CL-OH
   CL-ORGANIC
   CL-PAH
   CL-PATHOGN
   CL-PCO
   CL-PEST
   CL-PHARM
   CL-PHENOL
   CL-PHOSPHA
   CL-PHTH
   CL-PLAS
   CL-PLAT
   CL-PM
   CL-POM
   CL-PYRO
   CL-RAD
   CL-RCSPP
   CL-RESIN
   CL-ROSIN
   CL-RUBSOL
   CL-SALTS
   CL-SEWSLUD
   CL-SILVER
   CL-SOLMOLY
   CL-SOLRHOD
   CL-SOLTUNG
   CL-SOLVENT
   CL-SPORES
   CL-SULFATE
   CL-SULFIDE
   CL-SULFITE
   CL-SVOC
   CL-TIN
   CL-TRS
   CL-VARIOUS
   CL-VEG
   CL-VOC
   CL-WELD
   CL-WOOD
Methyl acetylene-propadiene mixture
Metallic compounds
Methoxybenzene compounds
Mineral dusts
Mineral fibers
Mineral oil mist
Mineral spirits
Nickel compounds
Nitrates
Nitrites
Nitroso compounds
Non-methane hydrocarbons
Odors
Hydroxides
Organic compounds
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Pathogens
Photochemical oxidants
Pesticides
Pharmaceuticals
Phenols
Phosphates
Phthalates
Plasticizers
Platinum compounds
Particulate matter
Polycyclic organic matter
Pyro powders
Radiation
Rosin core solder pyrolysis products
Resins
Rosin vapors
Rubber solvents
Salts
Sewage sludge
Silver compounds
Soluble molybdenum compounds
Soluble rhodium compounds
Soluble tungsten compounds
Solvents
Funqal spores
Sulfates
Sulfides
Sulfites
Semivolatile organic compounds
Organic tin compounds
Total reduced sulfur
Various pollutants
Vegetable oil  mist
Volatile organic compounds
Welding fumes
Wood smoke
                                  1-9

-------
                       TABLE 3.   LIST OF ACRONYMS
     ATSDR
     EPA
     CPSC
     I ARC
     NAS
     NCI
     NIEHS
     NIOSH
     NTP
     WHO
       KEY TO AGENCY ACRONYMS

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Consumer Products Safety Commission
International Agency for Research on Cancer
National Academy of Sciences
National Cancer Institute
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
National Institute for Occupation,! 1 Safety and Health
National Toxicology Program
World Health Organization
                 KEY TO DIVISION AND LABORATORY ACRONYMS

     AEERL        Air  and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
     AQMD         Air  Quality Management Division
     AREAL        Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment  Laboratory
     ASMD         Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division
     ASRL         Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory
     CAD          Characterization  and Assessment Division
     CSD          Criteria and  Standards Division
     EAG          Exposure Assessment Group
     EARD         Exposure Assessment Research Division
     ECAD         Existing Chemical Assessment Division
     ECAO         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
     EERF         Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
     EML          Emission Measurement Laboratory
     EMSL         Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
     ERD          Emergency Response Division
     ESD          Emission Standards Division
     HECD         Health and Ecological Criteria Division
     HED          Hazard Evaluation Division                       *
     HERL         Health Effects Research Laboratory
     HHAG         Human Health  Assessment Group
     IAD          Indoor Air Division
     RREL         Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
     SSCD         Stationary Source Compliance Division
     TSD          Technical Support Division
     WMD          Waste Management  Division
Reports by State and local agencies are indexed under the term
Local Agency."  Report numbers begin with the two-letter State
abbreviation.
                                             'State or
                                   1-10

-------
                        TABLE 4.   KEY TO DOCUMENT TYPES
AM                   Ambient Monitoring
CHIP                 Chemical Hazard  Information Profile  (EPA Only)
CS                   Case Study  (State and Local Agencies Only)
CT                   Control Technology
DM                   Dispersion Modeling
EA                   Exposure Assessment
EF                   Emission Factor
ER                   Accident Prevention/Emergency Response
ES                   Epidemiological  Study
FR                   Federal Register Notices
HA                   Health Assessment
IA                   Indoor Air
NESHAP               National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
                     (EPA Only)
NSPS                 New Source Performance Standards  (EPA Only)
OT                   Other (State and Local Agencies Only)
PD                   Air Toxics Program Support Document  (State and  Local
                     Agencies Only)
PP                   Pollution Prevention
PRA                  Pre-regulatory Assessment
RA                   Risk Assessment
RDG                  Regulatory Development Guidance
RR                   Rules and Regulations (State and  Local Agencies Only)
SA                   Source Assessment
SS                   Source Sampling
TITLE3               Clean Air Act Title III Guidance/Documents
TT                   Toxicity Testing
                                     1-11

-------
      All  bibliographic  citations will  continue  to  be  accessible  through the
 NATICH  on-line data  base.   These can  be sorted by a combination of factors:
 by  product,  and/or source  category, and/or document type,  and/or  sponsoring
 agency.

 1.3   ORDERING INFORMATION

                      CONSUMER PRODUCT  SAFETY COMMISSION

      Reports prepared by  the CPSC and  reproduced by the Government  Printing
Office  (GPO) may be  ordered by contacting:

                        Office of Superintendent of Documents
                        U. S. Government Printing Office
                        Washington, D.C.  20402

Prices are subject to change without notice.  A GPO order  form is  included at
the end of this section.   All remittances for GPO sales should be  by check or
money order payable  to the Superintendent of Documents.  Orders may be placed
by telephone if charged to a Superintendent of Documents Deposit Account or  to
a VISA/MasterCard/Choice account.  The order desk number is (202)  783-3238.

                         NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

      The National  Academy Press was created by the NAS to publish reports
issued by the Academy and  by the National Academy of Engineering,  the
Institute of Medicine, and National  Council  of Research, all operating under
the charter granted to the NAS by the Congress of the United States.
      An order form for the National  Academy Press may be found at the end of
this section.  When ordering from the National Academy Press,  use the
International Standard Book Number (ISBN),  the title, and the price shown in
the citation.  Some reports published by the Press do not have ISBN numbers.
These reports are reproduced and bound individually as they are requested or
"on demand."  All orders for these reports must be prepaid, and no returns are
permitted.
      Unless otherwise noted,  orders should  be mailed to:

                        National  Academy Press
                        2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
                        Washington,  D.C.  20418
                                     1-12

-------
A check, money order, or  institutional purchase order must  accompany  all
orders.  Book purchases over $10 may also be charged to VISA/MasterCard/
American Express accounts.  Telephone orders will be accepted when charged  to
VISA/MasterCard/American  Express accounts and may be placed by calling
1-800-624-6242.  Prices shown apply only in the United States, Canada, Puerto
Rico, and Mexico, and are subject to change without notice.
      Many reports published by the National Academy press are also available
from the National Technical Information Services (NTIS).  To order documents
from NTIS, return the order form, found at the end of this section, indicating
the publication (PB) number along with payment to:

                        National Technical Information Service
                        5285 Port Royal Road
                        Springfield, Virginia  22161
                        (703) 487-4650

NTIS prices for documents are indicated in each entry by a price code for
paper copies (PC), for microfiche (MF), and for microcomputer diskettes (D).
The Price Code Schedule for 1991 appears in Table 5.

             NATIONAL  INSTITUTE  FOR  OCCUPATIONAL  SAFETY  AND  HEALTH

      There are three possible sources for ordering NIOSH publications:
NIOSH,  GPO, and NTIS.   The NIOSH citations indicate the order number and price
for each source from which the particular document is available.
      Citations labeled "AVAIL NIOSH" were available as of January 31, 1991
free of charge by contacting:

                        NIOSH Publication Dissemination, R-6
                        4676 Columbia Parkway
                        Cincinnati,  Ohio  45226-1998
                        (513)  533-8287

Please  include a self-addressed mailing label.   Quantities available from •
NIOSH are limited or may no longer be available.
      Documents may be ordered from GPO by contacting:

                        Office of Superintendent  of Documents
                        U. S.  Government Printing Office
                        Washington,  D.C.   20402
                        (202)  783-3238
                                     1-13

-------
                      TABLE 5.  1991 NTIS PRICE SCHEDULE*

              MICROFICHE,  PAPER COPY, AND MICROCOMPUTER DISKETTES
Price Code
Domestic Price
MF A01
PC A02
A03
A04-A05
A06-A09
A10-A13
A14-A17
A18-A21
A22-A25
A99
D01
D02
DOS
D04
DOS
D06
DO 7
DOS
D09
D10
Dll
D12
D13
D14
D15
D16
D17
D18
D19
D99
E99
$ 8.00
11.00
15.00
17.00
23.00
31.00
39.00
45.00
53.00
Note**
50.00
80.00
130.00
180.00
230.00
280.00
330.00
380.00
430.00
480.00
530.00
580.00
630.00
680.00
730.00
780.00
830.00
880.00
930.00
Note**
Note**
   Contact NTIS for information on price listings for countries other than the
   U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

   Note:  Contact NTIS for price quote.


Shipping and handling charges:

            U.S., Canada, and Mexico - ADD $3 per TOTAL ORDER

            Exceptions - Does NOT apply to:
            ORDERS REQUESTING NTIS RUSH HANDLING (S12/ITEM FOR DOMESTIC FIRST
            CLASS, OR J22/ITEM FOR OVERNIGHT COURIER SERVICE)
            ORDERS FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR STANDING ORDER PRODUCTS ONLY

            Each additional  delivery address on an order requires a separate
            shipping and handling charge.
                                     1-14

-------
Prices are subject to change without notice.  A GPO order form  is  included at

the end of this section.  When ordering, it should be completed with GPO stock

numbers and titles.  All remittances for GPO sales should be by check or money
order payable to the Superintendent of Documents.  Orders may be placed by

telephone if charged to a Superintendent of Documents Deposit Account or to a
VISA/MasterCard/Choice account.  The order desk number is (202)783-3238.

      To order documents from NTIS, return the order form (found at the end of
this section) indicating the publication (PB) number along with payment to:


                        National Technical Information Service
                        5285 Port Royal Road
                        Springfield, Virginia  22161
                        (703) 487-4650


NTIS prices for documents are indicated in each entry by a price code for

paper copies (PC) and for microfiche (MF).  The Price Code Schedule for 1991
appears in Table 5.


      U.  S.  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY AND  NATIONAL  CANCER  INSTITUTE


      U. S.  EPA and NCI documents listed here are available from the NTIS.  To
order documents from NTIS, return the order form, found at the end of this
section, indicating the publication (PB) number along with payment to:


                        National Technical Information Service
                        5285 Port Royal Road
                        Springfield, Virginia  22161
                        (703) 487-4650


NTIS prices  for documents are indicated in each entry by price code for paper
copies (PC)  and for microfiche (MF).  The Price Code Schedule for 1991 appears
in Table 5.

      The Federal Register notices announced by EPA are available from the
U. S. Government Printing Office.  The charge for each issue is $1.50.  To
order, contact:


                        Office of Superintendent of Documents
                        U. S. Government Printing Office
                        Washington, D.C.  20402
                        (202) 783-3238


A GPO order  form is included at the end of this section.   All remittances  for

GPO sales should be by check or money order payable to the Superintendent  of

Documents.   Orders may be placed by telephone if charged to a Superintendent

                                     1-15

-------
 of Documents Deposit  Account  or  to  a  VISA/MasterCard/Choice  account.   The
 order desk number is  (202)  783-3238.

       National  Air Toxics  Information Clearinghouse  publications  are  also
 available free  of charge to Federal,  State,  and  local  agencies, as well  as

 nonprofit organizations, by contacting the Clearinghouse  staff  at  (919)  541-

 0850,  (FTS)  629-0850.   The  private  sector may purchase Clearinghouse  reports
 from  NTIS,  or from Radian Corporation at  (512) 454-4797,  ext. 5224.   The

 Clearinghouse Newsletter is available free of charge to all  interested persons

 by contacting the Clearinghouse  staff at  (919) 541-0850 or (FTS) 629-0850 to
 be placed on the  Clearinghouse mailing list.


   WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL  AGENCY FOR  RESEARCH ON CANCER


       Publications  from the WHO, including IARC  reports,  are available from:


                        WHO Publications Center, USA
                        49  Sheridan Avenue
                        Albany,  New York  12210
                        (518) 436-9686


All orders for WHO  publications  must  be prepaid.  Prices  are shown in each
citation.  For postage  and  handling,  add $3.00 for the first publication

ordered and  $0.50  for each  additional  publication.  Prices are subject to
change without notice.

      The  IARC publications are  also  available from:


                        Customer Service Department
                        Oxford University Press
                        16-00 Pollitt Drive
                        Fair Lawn,  New Jersey  07410
                        1-800-451-7556
                                     1-16

-------
2.0  REPORT AND FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE ENTRIES
                      2-1

-------
W
         GPO 055-000-00367-0
         Environmental Hazard* in Tour School:
         EPA
         1990, 75p, $2.25
A Resource Handbook
         Abstract:  This publication provides information on a number of the
         environmental hazard* children may be exposed to in school buildings.
         These include asbestos,  indoor air pollutants,  radon,  lead in drinking
         water,  and other contaminant! in school-operated water systems.   Or-
         ganizations:   National Education Association,  National Parent Teacher
         Association,  Council for American Private  Education,  Occupational
         Health Foundation,  National Association  of Independent Schools,  and
         United States Catholic Conference.

         EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         IA          INDOOR AIR
         10043-92-2  RADON
         1332-21-4   ASBESTOS
         7439-92-1   LEAD PONDER
         82          EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
         821         ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
         8211         ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
   -.
Health Effects Assessment for  .  .  .
EPA, Cincinnati, OR, ECAO
Various dates, Length varies, Available fro* NTIS

Abstract:  The report summarizes and evaluate! information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects associated
«ith specific chemicals or compounds.  The Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response  (Superfund) uses these documents in preparing cost-
benefit analyses under Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under
CERCLA.  All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as preliminary and re-
flect limited resources allocated to the project.  The intent in the
assessments is to suggest acceptable exposure levels whenever suf-
ficient data are available.  The interim values presented reflect the
relative degree of hazard associated Kith exposure or risk to the
chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values
have been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer
is not the endpoint of concern).  The first, RfDS or subchronic refer-
ence dose, is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be ex-
pected to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs during a limited
time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level that would
not be expected to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a
significant portion of the lifespan.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HA          HEALTH ASSESSMENT
100-42-5    STYRENE
108-95-2    PHENOL
127-18-4    TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
1330-20-7   XYLENE
50-29-3     DDT
56-23-5     CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
57-74-9     CHLORDANE
67-64-1     ACETONE
67-66-3     CHLOROFORM
71-43-2     BENZENE
7440-43-9   CADMIUM
75-09-2     METHYLENE CHLORIDE
78-93-3     METHYL ETHYL KETONE
79-01-6     TRICHLOROETHYLENE
91-20-3     NAPHTHALENE
93-76-5     TRICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID, 2, 4, 5-

-------
 MD01TM86-02
 AMBIENT AIR  QUALITY IMPACT SCREENING MODEL PROCEDURES FOR TOXIC AIR
 POLLUTANTS.
 MD DEPARTMENT Or  THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 MARYLAND AIR MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
 11/01/86, 46 pag«.

 THIS TECHNICAL DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO ASSIST SOURCES IN CALCULATING
 AMBIENT LEVELS OF TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS (TAPS)  TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE
 WITH MARYLAND'S DRAFT AIR TOXICS REGULATIONS.   THE DOCUMENT OUTLINES,
 STEP-BY-STEP,  SIMPLE SCREENING MODEL PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATIMNG
 AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS OF TAPS.  THE PROCEDURES ALSO ALLOW A SOURCE TO
 CALCULATE THE EMISSION RATE WHICH WOULD CREATE A CONCENTRATION EQUAL
 TO THE  SCREENING  LEVEL OF THE SUBSTANCE DISCHARGED.  THE PROCEDURES
 HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED TO MINIMIZE THE VARIABLES INVOLVED AND REQUIRE
 ONLY INFORMATION  DESCRIBING EMISSIONS AND  SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS.
 BOTH POINT SOURCES  (I.E.  STACK AND VENTS)  AND AREA SOURCES  (I.E. FUG-
 ITIVE EMISSIONS,  STOCKPILES)  CAN BE EASILY EVALUATED USING THESE
 PROCEDURES.   IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THAT THESE PROCEDURES WILL ALMOST
 ALWAYS  OVERESTIMATE ACTUAL AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS. (PRICE: $5.)

 DM          DISPERSION MODELING
 MD01         MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 PD          AT SUPPORT DOCUMENT
 STATE/LOC    STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY

 MD019601
 MARYLAND'S AIR TOXIC CONTROL PROGRAM:   WORKING GROUP DELIBERATIONS.
 MD DEPARTMENT OF  THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 SUSAN S.G. WIERMAN,  GEORGE S.  ABURN,  DOROTHY M.  GUY,  JOEL H. COOPER.
 05/01/86,  170  pagca

 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS  THE MINUTES OF 10 MEETINGS OF A WORKING GROUP
 FORMED TO ASSIST  MARYLAND IN DEVELOPING DRAFT  AIR TOXIC REGULATIONS.
 THE GROUP, FOPMED TO ENSURE THAT ALL INTERESTS WERE CONSIDERED,  REPRES
 ENTED THE BUSINESS  COMMUNITY,  ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS, THE STATE
 LEGISLATURE,   EPA, AND ACADEMIA.  THE WORKING GROUP PROVIDED A FORUM
 FOR IDENTIFYING AND RESOLVING ISSUES OF CONCERN ASSOCIATED WITH THE
 DRAFT REGULATIONS.   THE DOCUMENT ALSO EXPLAINS MARYLAND'S PRELIMINARY
 PROPOSED PROGRAM  DESIGN.   (PRICE:   $16.)

MD01        MD DEPARTMENT  OF  THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 PD          AT SUPPORT  DOCUMENT
 STATE/LOC   STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY
 M001B602
 DEVELOPING AN AIR TOXICS CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND
 MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 ABURN,  GEORGE S.  JR.,  FERRERI,  GEORGE P.,  AND WIERMAN, SUSAN S G
 06/01/86,  9 pag««

 THIS PAPER PRESENTED AT THE 79TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AIR POLLUTION
 CONTROL ASSOCIATION IN MINNEAPOLIS,  MINNESOTA,  DESCRIBES THE PROCESS
 MARYLAND HAS USED IN DEVELOPING ITS  AIR TOXICS CONTROL PROGRAM,
 BRIEFLY SUMMARIZES THE PRELIMINARY PROGRAM DESIGN,  AND IDENTIFIES
 ISSUES  THAT HAVE ARISIN IN THIS PROCESS.   THE AUTHORS' INTENT IS TO
 PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT MAY VE USEFUL TO OTHER STATES INVOLVED IN
 SIMILAR PROJECTS.  (PRICE $2.)

 MD01        MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN
 PD          AT SUPPORT DOCUMENT
 STATE/LOC    STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY

 M0018603
 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MARYLAND'S  PROPOSED AIR TOXICS  PROGRAM
 MD DEPARTMENT OF  THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 MARYLAND AIR MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
 09/01/87,  256 pages

     THIS  DOCUMENT CONTAINS THE PROCEEDINGS  OF  A SEMINAR ON RISK
 ASSESSMENT HELD IN THE BALTIMORE AREA ON SEPTIMBER  18,  1986.
     SPEAKERS AT  THE SEMINAR INCLUDED REGION III ADMINISTRATOR JAMES
 SEIF; DR.  PETER PREUSS,  DIRECTOR OF  EPA'S OFFICE OF HEALTH  AND
 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; AND DR. MORTON CORN,  DIRECTOR OF  THE
 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENGINEERING AT THE JOHNS HOPKINS
 UNIVERSITY.
     THE PROCEEDINGS CONTAIN EPA'S NONTECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE
 PRINCIPLES OF RISK ASSESSMENT,  DR. CORN'S CRITIQUE  OF  THE USE  OF
 THRESHOLD  LIMIT VALUES TO ESTABLISH AMBIENT  GUIDELINES FOR
 CARCINOGENS,  EPA'S SUMMARY  REPORT ON  A DIOXIN ANALYSIS OF
 PHILADELPHIA'S  NORTHWEST INCINERATOR,  AND OTHER PAPERS  ON RISK
ASSESSMENT,  RISK MANAGEMENT, RISK COMMUNICATION,  EPA'S AIR  TOXICS
 POLICY,  AND  MARYLAND'S DRAFT AIR TOXICS REGULATIONS.   (PRICE:  $23.)

MD01         MD  DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN
PD          AT  SUPPORT DOCOHKNT
STATE/LOC    STATE  OR LOCAL AGENCY

-------
 I
Ol
 MD01.860J
 ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MARYLAND'S PROPOSED AIR TOXIC
 REGULATIONS
 MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 MARYLAND AIR MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
 12/01/86,  87 pages

      THIS DOCUMENT DISCUSSES THE COSTS OF COMPLYING KITH THE
 MARYLAND'S DRAFT AIR TOXICS REGULATIONS.  THE APPENDIX ANALYZES COSTS
 TO CONTROL FOUR HYPOTHETICAL EMISSIONS SOURCES.
      COST TO BUSINESS WILL PRIMARILY RESULT FROM ESTIMATING EMISSIONS,
 MODELING THE IMPACT OF THESE EMISSIONS ON AMBIENT AIR QUALITY, AND
 CONTROLLING EMISSIONS.   THE TOTAL  COSTS TO ALL REGULATED BUSINESSES IS
 ESTIMATED TO RANGE FROM $350,000-9830,000 PER YEAR FOR THE FIRST FOUR
 YEARS AFTER THE REGULATIONS ARE ADOPTED.
      A FEW SOURCES MAY INCUR SUBSTANTIAL COSTS FOR EMISSIONS CONTROLS
 BEYOND THOSE REQUIRED BY OTHER REGULATIONS.  CONTROL COSTS HILL VARY
 FROM ZERO TO SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND  DOLLARS OR MORE.  COSTS FOR
 SOURCES  THAT MOST CONTROL EMISSIONS  WILL BE RELATED TO THE PUBLIC
 HEALTH RISKS THEIR EMISSIONS CAUSE.
      COSTS TO THE STATE ARE EXPECTED TO BE ABOUT $250,000 FOR
 EQUIPMENT AND ABOUT $250,000 PER YEAR  FOR PERSONNEL AND OTHER
 OPERATING COSTS.   (PRICE:   $8.)

 M001         MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 PD          AT SUPPORT DOCUMENT
 STATE/LOC   STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY

 M0018701
 TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS COVERED BY MARYLAND' S PROPOSED AIR TOXICS
 REGULATIONS
 MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT,AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 MARYLAND AIR MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
 02/01/87,  79 pages

      THIS  DOCUMENT EXPLAINS THE SUBSTANCES COVERED BY MARYLAND'S
 PROPOSED AIR TOXICS PROGRAM.  MARYLAND CLASSIFIES CARCINOGENS AS CLASS
 I  TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS  (TAPS) AND  OTHER TOXICS AS CLASS II TAPS.
 CLASS I TAPS ARE CARCINOGENS IDENTIFIED BY THE INTENATIONAL AGENCY
 FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER (IARC) AND  THE  NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM
 (NTP).  TO DEFINE CLASS II  TAPS, MARYLAND USED OSHA' S HEALTH HAZARD
 CRITERIA.   THIS DEFINITION OF CLASS  II TAPS IS OPEN-ENDED,  AND THERE
 IS  NO LIST OF ALL CLASS II  TAPS.   MARYLAND HAS ESTABLISHED PRIORITY
 LISTS OF TAPS TO DEFINE AND LIMIT  THE  PROGRAM FOR EXISTING SOURCES.
 THE APPENDICES INCLUDE  AN ANNOTATED  LIST OF CARCINOGENS,  THE IARC
 TOXIC AIR  POLLUTANTS COVERED BY MARYLAND'S PROPOSED AIR TOXICS
 REGULATIONS  PROCESS FOR EVALUATING CARCINOGENIC RISK,  AND THE
 PRIORITY LIST OF  CLASS  I AND CLASS II  TAPS FOR EXISTING SOURCES.
 (PRICE:  $8.).

MD01        MD DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AIR MANAGEMENT ADMIN.
 PD          AT SUPPORT  DOCUMENT
 STATE/LOC    STATE  OR LOCAL  AGENCY
                                                                                  OH01 DIOXIN DQ02
                                                                                  Determination of Polychlorinatad Dibenzo-p-diozins and
                                                                                  Dibenzofubans from Hazardous Wait* Incinerators in Ohio.
                                                                                  OHIO EPA, DIV. OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
                                                                                  OAQDA and Ohio EPA
                                                                                  10/31/91

                                                                                  Two sources of hazardous wast* incineration in Ohio are being
                                                                                  evaluated for potential PCDD and PCDF emissions into the atBoaphere.
                                                                                  One stack teat and 2 ambient air test* are being completed for this
                                                                                  study.  Diozin measurements will be described by conge  profiles.
                                                                                  This it the second study by Ohio EPA determining diozin concentrations
                                                                                  in ambient air.  This project should be completed by the end of 1991,
                                                                                  and will be available from Ohio EPA - Division of Air Pollution
                                                                                  Control.
                                                                                  OH01
                                                                                  STATE/LOC
            OHIO EPA, DIV. OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
            STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY
OH01 LAKE ERIE E001
Input of tozic substances fro the atmosphere to Lake Erie.
OHIO EPA, DIV. OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
OAQDA and Ohio EPA
49 pages

This study was an evaluation of the pathways by which chemicals enter
Lake Erie.  Ezisting data was combined with calculations of dry and
wet deposition, input from tributaries, and vapor flui outputs to
determine estimates of absolute amounts of tozic substances entering
the lake.  The relative contribution from atomospheric pathways also
is stated.  Thirteen chemicals had enough data available to be
included in the final analysis.  For most chemicals studied
atmospheric input into Lake Erie I* a minute fraction of the total
input.  A detailed report is available from Ohio EPA - Division of
Air Pollution Control.
                                                                                  OH01
                                                                                  STATE/LOC
            OHIO EPA, DIV. OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
            STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY
                                                                                  QH01 RADON 1234
                                                                                  Ohio Radon Research directions
                                                                                  OHIO EPA,  DIV.  OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
                                                                                  OAQDA and Ohio  EPA
                                                                                  var pages

                                                                                  Four radon research projects have been completed and are available
                                                                                  for use by interested parties.  1.  Correlation of measured radon in
                                                                                  soil and uranium concentration of Ohio state,  with diffusion
                                                                                  coefficients  for soil thickness.   2. Radon hazards associated with
                                                                                  glacial deposits in Ohio.   3.  Indoor radon concentrations in northeast
                                                                                  Ohio counties,  and 4.  Radon hazards associated with outcrops of the
                                                                                  Devonian Ohio state.   Also,  a computer data base is being established
                                                                                  to comple all known indoor radon concentrations for the state.   These
                                                                                  studies were  designed to help formulate Ohio'm radon reduction
                                                                                  program through the Ohio Department of Health.
                                                                                  OH01
                                                                                  STATE/LOC
                                                                                     OHIO EPA, DIV.  OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
                                                                                     STATE OR LOCAL  AGENCY

-------
to
         OE01 SEWSLUDGE S001
         Toxic Air emission* from Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Ohio.
         OHIO EPA, DIV. OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
         OAQDA and Ohio EPA
         116 pag**

         Stack t**ting va* p*rfom*d on two **wag* *ludg* incinerator*  in Ohio.
         Testing covered trace metal* and organic compound*.   This report
         summarize* the finding* from the *tack te*t* a* veil  as  characterize*
         the emi**ion* from the other 12 incinerator* of *evage *ludg*  in Ohio.
         The results of thi* *tudy ax* available from the Ohio EPA - Division
         of Air Pollution Control.
         OH01
         STATE/LOG
            OHIO  EPA, DIV.  OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
            STATE OR LOCAL  AGENCY
 PB90-110131
 Indoor Air Source*:  Using Small Environmental Te«t Chamber* to
 Characterize Organic Emi**ion*  from  Indoor Material* and Products
 EPA, Research Triangle  Park, NC, AEERL
 B.A. Tichenor
 Aug 89, 41p, EPA-600/8-89-074,  PC A03/MT A01

 Abstract:  The report describe* procedure* for determining organic
 emission rates from indoor materials/products using small environmen-
 tal test chamber*.  The technique* presented are useful for both rou-
 tine product testing by manufacturers and testing laboratories and for
 more rigorous evaluation by Indoor air quality researchers.

 CL-ORCANIC  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR
 SS          SOURCE SAMPLING

 PB90-119765
 Directory of Information Resources Related to Health,  Exposure,  and
 Risk Assessment of Air  Toxics
 EPA, Research Triangle  Park, NC, Air RISC
 Aug 89,  92p,  EPA-450/3-88-015,  PC A05/MF A01

 Abstract:  Many State and local agencies are developing or implement-
 ing program* to control emission* of toxic air pollutants.   To suc-
 cessfully carry cut thsss progress,  in sany casss,  agancy personnel
must be familiar with a wide rang* of issues related to health,  expo-
 sure,  and risk as«e**ment for toxic air pollutants.   However,  locating
appropriate sources of information on these topics is not always an
easy task.   The directory has been prepared by the U.S.  EPA's  Air Risk
 Information Support Center  (Air RISC) as a resource tool for State and
 local air pollution control agencies and EPA Regional Offices  to iden-
tify useful source* of information regarding health,  exposure,  and
 ri*k a*****ments for toxic air pollutant*.
        EA
        EPA
        HA
        PD
        RA
        RDG
            EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            HEALTH ASSESSMENT
            AT SUPPORT DOCUMENT
            RISK ASSESSMENT
            REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
 PB90-120148
 MOBILE4 Exhauat Emi**ion Factor* and Inspection/Maintenance Benefits
 for Passenger Cars
 EPA,  Ann Arbor, MI,  TSS
 E.L.  Glover and D.J.  Brzazinaki
 Aug 89,  66p,  EPA-AA/TSS-IM-89-3,  PC A04/MT A01

 Abstract:   The MOBILE4  Tech IV Credit Model is used to estimate the
 emission factor equations,  the affects of Inspection and Maintenance
 (I/M)  programs, and the bag fraction equation* for 1981 and latar pas-
 senger cars.   The model's results are then stored in the EPA MOBILE4
 emission factor model database.   The report describes the development,
 use and results of the  Tech IV model.  It also documents the normal-
 ized bag fractions,  high altitude emission factors,  biennial I/M cred-
 its,  and idle emission  I/M credits used in MOBILE4.
                                                                                  IT
                                                                                  EPA
                                                                                  PP
            EMISSION FACTOR
            ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
            POLLUTION PREVENTION
PB90-120544
Draft Test Report:  A Performance Test  on a  Spray Dryer, Fabric
Filter, and Net Scrubber System
EPA, Washington, DC, OSW
S. Garg
Oct 89, 128p, EPA-530/SN-90-008, PC A07/MF A01

Abstract:  The EPA's Office of Solid Waste (OSW) is currently develop-
ing regulations to control eml**ion* of products of incomplete com-
bustion, particulate matter and toxic metals from hazardous waste in-
cinerators.  Emissions data to support  these regulations was collected
and testing was conducted on a toxic substances control waste inciner-
ator between 4/25-27/89.  EPA'* objective* were to collect particulate
and metal* removal efficiency and emission* data for the combined
spray dryer and baghouse system and the total air pollution control
system; characterize the fate of waste  feed metal* through the incin-
eration and air pollution control system*; and evaluate the potential
u*e of a surrogate metal 'soup' as a mean* of assessing control effi-
ciencies and establishing allowable waste feed concentrations for
toxic metals.

CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
CL-ORGANIC  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS

-------
ro
 i
•vl
 PB90-127374
 Compendium of Method*  for  the  Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds
 in Ambient Air,  June 1988
 EPA,  Research Triangie Park, NC, AREAL
 Engineering  Science
 H.T.  Hinberry, N.T. Murphy, and R.M. Riggan
 Jun 88,  600p, EPA-600/4-89-017, PC A25/MF A04

 Abstract:  The Compendium  ha*  been prepared to provide regional,
 State, and local environmental regulatory agencies, as well as other
 interested parties, with specific guidance on the determination of
 selected toxic organic compounds in ambient air.  The decision was
 made  to  begin preparation  of a Compendium which would provide specific
 sampling and analysis  procedures, in a standard!xed format, for
 selected toxic organic compounds.  The current Compendium consists of
 fourteen procedures which  are  considered to be of primary importance
 in current toxic organic monitoring efforts.

 AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
 CL-ORGANIC  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 95          ENVIRONMENTAL  QUALITY AND HOUSING
 951          ENVIRONMENTAL  QUALITY
 9511         AIR, WATER, t  SOLID HASTE MANAGEMENT

 PB90-129362
 Pilot-Scale  ESP  (Electrostatic Precipitator) and Hydro-Sonic Scrubber
 Parametric Tests for Pazticulate, Metals and HC1 Emissions
 EPA, Washington, DC, OSW
 S.  Garg
 Jun 89,  77p,  EPA-530/SW-90-009, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The EPA's Office of Solid Haste is currently developing ad-
ditional regulations to control emissions of particulate matter, toxic
metals and hydrochloric acid (HC1)  from hazardous waste incinerators.
Emissions  data was collected to support these regulations; testing was
 conducted  on two pilot-scale air pollution control systems installed
and operated in Tulsa,   OK.  The test program took place between March
 28 and April 4,  1989.   The report represents the results of the test-
ing program  and describes the  processes involved as well as the test-
ing and  analytical methods used.   The primary objective of the test
program was to collect  particulate and toxic metals removal efficiency
and emissions data for  two pilot-scale air pollution control systems—
hydro-sonic wet scrubber; and beltran two-stage electrostatic precipi-
tator.

CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFMNCK STD
SA           SOURCE ASSESSMENT
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
7647-01-0   HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
PB90-134172
Follow-Dp Alpha-Track Monitoring In  40 Eastern Pennsylvania Houses
with  Indoor Radon  Reduction  Systems.   (Winter 1988-89)
EPA,  Research Triangle  Park, NC, AEERL
American  ATCON,  Inc.
A.G.  Scott and A.  Robertson
Oct 89, 27p, EPA-600/8-89-083, PC A03/MF A01

Abstract:  The report gives  results  of 4-month-long alpha-track de-
tector  (ATD) measurements of indoor  radon concentrations, completed
during the winter  of 1988-89 in  38 of 40 houses where radon reduction
techniques had been installed  2-4 years previously during an earlier
EPA project.  The  techniques,  installed between June 1985 and June
1987, generally  involved some  form of active soil ventilation:  three
were  air-to-air  heat exchangers, and two involved carbon filters to
remove radon from  well  water.  The purpose of these measurements was
to determine if  the radon reduction  performance of the systems had
degraded  compared  to previous  wintertime radon measurements.  Compari-
son of the current ATD  results with  those from 1986-87 and 1987-88 in-
dicates that, in the 34 houses where the system was in continuous
operation during this measurement period, the radon levels generally
compared  well with those measured during the previous years.  In only
two houses did significant,  unexplainable increases occur.  Two soil
ventilation fans failed during the previous year:  5 out of 34 fans
have  failed to date.  One air-to-air heat exchanger has needed repair.
The one water treatment unit designed specifically for radon removal
is giving 97% removal,  whereas the other has degraded to 65%.

CT          CNTRL  TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON

PB90-141227
Surface Impoundment Modeling System  (SIMS), User's Manual
EPA,  Research Triangle  Park, NC, CTC
Radian Corporation
S. Watkins
Sep 89, 40p, EPA-450/4-89-013A, PC A03/MF A01

Abstract:  Surface impoundments are  used to treat, store, and dispose
of waste water generated by  facilities in many different industries.
The Surface Impoundment Modeling System (SIMS) is a personal computer
based program designed  to estimate the air emissions from surface im-
poundments.  The emission estimates are based on mass transfer models
developed by the Emissions Standards Division (ESD) of the EPA during
the evaluation of  hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDF's).  SIMS allows the user to specify all required in-
puts  to these emission models  when this information is available, or
when  only limited  information  is available, provides default values
for most of the  model inputs.  The manual presents a complete refer-
ence  for all of  the features and commands in SIMS.
EPA
SA
                                                                                              ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                              SOURCE ASSESSMENT

-------
to
 I
CD
         PB90-141235
         Background Document for the Surfaca Impoundment Modaling System (SIMS)
         EPA, Raaaarch Triangla Park, NC, CTC
         Radian Corporation
         S. Hatkint
         Sap 89,  184p, EPA-450/4-89-013B, PC A09/MF A01

         Abstract:   Surfaca impoundments ara used to treat,  atora,  and dlaposa
         of waata vatar ganaratad by facilities in many diffarant induatriaa.
         Tha Surfaca Impoundment Modaling System (SIMS)  ii  a paraonal computer
         baaad program daaignad to estimate tha air emissions froa aurfaca  im-
         poundments.  Tha emission estimates ara baaad on mass tranafar models
         developed by tha Emissions Standard* Division (ESD)  of tha EPA during
         tha evaluation of hazardous waata treatment,  atoraga,  and disposal
         facilities (TSDF'a).   SIMS allows tha uaar to spacify all  required in-
         puts to  thaaa emission models whan tha information is available, or
         when only  limited information ia available,  provides default vlaues
         for most of tha model inputs.  Tha manual presents  a complete refer-
         ence for all of tha features and commands in SIMS.
         EPA
         SA
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            SOURCE ASSESSMENT
PB90-143447
Aaroaol Industry Success in Reducing CFC  (Chlorofluorocarbon)
Propellant Uaaga
EPA, Raaaarch Triangla Park, NC, AIERL
Radian Corporation
T.P. Nelson and S.L. Wavlll
Nov 89, 227p, EPA-600/2-89-062, PC All/MF A02

Abstract:  Tha two-part report discusses the reduction of Chloro-
fluorocarbon (CFC) propallant uaage.  Part I discusses the U.S. aero-
sol industry'a experience in converting from CFC propellants to alter-
native aaroaol formulations.  Detailed examples of non-CFC formula-
tions ara provided for 28 categories of aerosol products.  Hydrocarbon
propellants, which cost lass than CFCa, ara most often selected as the
propellants of choice unless special properties (e.g., increased sol-
vency or reduced flammability) are needed.  Dimethyl ether is the next
most preferred CFC alternative although it la flammable and a strong
aolvent.  Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide,  and nitrogen are inexpenaive
and widely available, but have been underused as aeroaol propellants.
Special equipment ia often needed to add them to the aeroaol contain-
ers.
 PB90-145772
 Indoor Air:  Reference Bibliography
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 D.  Campbell,  D.  Stavaa,  and S.  McDonald
 Jul 89,  341p,  IPA-600/8-89-067F,  PC A15/MF A02

 Abstract:   Tha U.S.  EPA initially established the indoor air Reference
 Bibliography  in 1987 aa an appendix to tha Indoor Air Quality Imple-
 mentation  Plan.   The document waa submitted to Congress aa required
 under Title IV—Radon Gaa and Indoor Air Quality Research of the
 Superfund  Amendments and Reauthoriiation Act of 1986.   The Reference
 Bibliography  ia  an extensive  bibliography of reference materials on
 indoor air pollution.   The Bibliography contains over 4500 citations
 and continues  to increase as  new  articles appear.

 CL-IAP     INDOOR AIR POLLUTANTS
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR

 PB90-146416
 Air Emissions  Species Manual  (Addendum to the)
 EPA,  Research  Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 Radian Corporation
 G.N.  Brooks, J.T.  Haddell,  and A.  Butler
 Oct  89,  311p,  EPA-450/2-88-003C,  PC  A14/MF A02

 Abstract:   Tha U.S.  EPA haa several  activitiea  that require  apeciated
 particulate matter (PM) or volatile  organic compound  (VOC) profiles
 from  several source  categories.    In  an effort to update the  available
 apeciated  PM profile data base,  EPA  haa Initiated  studies  to update
 varioua  reference  manuals.  The document  updates the PM profiles in
 the Air  Emissions  Species Manual, Volume  II with new information ob-
 tained from contacta with principal  researchers in the field of PM
 species profiles and source receptor modeling.  The new profilea were
 developed  using the procedures and protocols specified in  the original
Air Emissions  Species Manual,  Volume II.   The profiles are based on
data submitted by the researchera.

CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        CL-CFC      CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS
        EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
        28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
        283         DRUGS
        2834        PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
        284         SOAP, CLEANERS, AND TOILET GOODS
        2844        TOILET PREPARATIONS
        73          BUSINESS SERVICES
        738         MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS SERVICES
        7389        BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC

-------
N>
 I
<0
 PB90-146697
 Nonmethane Organic Compound Monitoring Program.  Final  Report  1988.
 Volume 2.   Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program
 •PA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  QAQPS
 Radian Corporation
 R.A.  McAllister,  et al.
 Apr 89,  277p,  EPA-450/4-89-005, PC A13/MF A02

 Abstract:   Fro* October,  1987 to  October, 1988 samples  of ambient air
 were  collected at 19 sites in the eastern part of the U.S.  Every 12
 days,  air  was integrated over 24-hour  periods into passivated  stain-
 less  steel canisters.   Simultaneously,  air was drawn through car-
 tridges  containing dinltrophenylhydrazlne to collect carbonyl  com-
 pounds.  The samples were analyzed at  a central laboratory for a total
 of  37 halogenated and aromatic hydrocarbons, formaldehyde, acetalde-
 hyde,  and  other oxygenated species.  The hydrocarbon species were ana-
 lyzed by gas chromatography/multiple detectors and gas  chromatography/
 mass  spectrometry,  while the carbonyl  species were analyzed by liquid
 chromatography.   An extensive quality  assurance program was carried on
 to  secure  high quality data.   Complete data for all the hydrocarbon
 samples  are presented in the report.

 AM           AMBIENT MONITORING
 CL-ALDEHYD  ALDEHYDES
 CL-NMHC      NON-METHANE  HYDROCARBONS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 50-00-0      FORMALDEHYDE
 75-07-0      ACETALDEHYDE

 PB90-149972
 Alternative Formulations to Reduce  CFC (Chlorofluorocarbons) Use in
 U.S.  Exempted and Excluded Aerosol  Products
 EPA,  Research  Triangle Park,  NC, AEERL
 Radian Corporation
 T.P.  Nelson and S.L. Wevill
 Nov 89,  155p,  EPA-600/2-89-061

 Abstract:   The report  examines products  exempted and excluded  from
 those affected by the  1978  ban on the  use of Chlorofluorocarbons
 (CFCa) as  aerosol prop*11ant«, the present consumption  of CFCs still
 utilized for theae products in the U.S., and alternative formulations
which may  be used to reduce or eliminate the CFC content of these pro-
ducts.   (NOTE:  The ban  allowed for exemptions if it could be  demon-
 strated that no acceptable  alternative propellants were available and
that the products were essential.  Essentiality was based on three
criteria:   (1) the  product's  economic  significance, (2) the environ-
mental and health impacts of  the product and its substitutes,   and (3)
the effects  on the  quality  of life resulting from no longer having the
product or  a reasonable substitute available.   Also,  if a CFC  served
some purpose other  than as  a  propellant, that product was excluded
 from the regulation.)  The  study shows that about 40% of the CFC usage
in theae products can be immediately replaced by available substi-
tutes.   It  identified  seven categories of products for which immedi-
 ate replacement of  all of the CFC content is not technically feasible.

 CL-CFC       CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS
EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 PP           POLLUTION  PREVENTION
PB90-151457
Effects of Appliance Type and Operating Variables on Hoodstove
Emissions.  Volume 1.  Report and Appendices A-C
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.
P.G. Burnet, J.E. Houck, and R.B. Roholt
Jan 90, 136p, EPA-600/2-90-001A, PC A07/MF A01

Abstract:  The report gives results of a project, in support of the
integrated Air Cancer Project (IACP), to provide data on the specific
effects of appliance type and operating variables on woodstove emis-
sions.  Samples of participate material and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) were collected.  Particulate samples were analyzed for differ-
ent organic fractions including specific polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbon (PAH) compounds.  Inorganic matter on the filters was also ana-
lyzed.  Results were calculated for pollutant concentrations, emission
rates, and emission factors.  Twelve test runs were conducted on a
conventional stove, and two on a catalyst-equipped stove.  Operating
variables included fuel type (oak and pine), altitude (80 and 800 m),
and burn rate (high and low).  Test data were analyzed using analysis
of variance and linear regression procedures.  Although the data do
not show strong statistical significance due to variability of re-
sults, some general trends do appear to be present, and conclusions
can be drawn as to the effects of various operating variables on wood-
stove emissions.

CL-PAH      POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING

-------
ro
 i
PB90-151465
Effects of Appliance Type and Operating Variables on Noodstove
Emissions.  Volume 2.  Appendices D-F
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AIERL
OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.
P.G. Burnet, J.E. Rouck, and R.B. Roholt
Jan 90, 266p, EPA-600/2-90-001B, PC A12/MF A02

Abstract:  The report gives results of a project. In support of the
Integrated Air Cancer Project (IACP), to provide data on the specific
effects of appliance type and operating variables on woodstove emis-
sions.  Sanples of particulate material and volatile organic compound*
(VOCs) were collected.  Particulate samples were analyzed for differ-
ent organic fractions Including specific polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbon (PAH) compounds.  Inorganic matter on the filters was also
analyzed.  Results were calculated for pollutant concentrations,  emis-
sion rates, and emission factors.  Twelve test runs were conducted on
a conventional stove, and two on a catalyst-equipped stove.   Operating
variables included fuel type (oak and pine),  altitude (80 and 800 m),
and burn rate (high and low).  Test data were analyzed using analysis
of variance and linear regression procedures.  Although the  data do
not show strong statistical significance due to variability  of re-
sults, sooie general trends do appear to be present,  and conclusions
can be drawn as to the effects of various operating variables on wood-
stove emissions.

CL-PAH      POLYCYCLIC AROHATIC HYDROCARBONS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
 PB90-152224
 Nonoccupational Pesticide Exposure Study (HOPES)
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  AREAL
 Research Triangle Inst.
 F.W.  Immerman and J.L. Schaum
 Jan 90,  256p,  EPA-600/3-90-003,  PC A12/MF A02

 Abstract:   The Non-occupational Pesticide Exposure Study was the first
 attempt  to develop a methodology for measuring the potential exposure
 of specified populations to common pesticides.   In the study,  as in
 other studies utilizing the Total Exposure Assessment Methodology
 (TEAM),  the exposures were related to actual  use  patterns.   A selected
 list  of  32 household pesticides were evaluated in two different cities
 during the study.   Air samples were collected over a 24-hour period in
 indoor,  outdoor and personal  mlcroenvironments.   In addition,  limited
 water and  dermal contact samples  were collected for selected homes
 The study  households were selected frcsi stratified randan population
 samples  in two urbanized areas.   The samples  were collected over sev-
 eral  seasons in areas contrasting a relatively  high and low use of
 pesticides.   Dietary recall,  activity pattern,  and pesticide use data
 were  collected through survey questionnaires.   The report discusses
 the results of the study with an  emphasis on  the  various routes of ex-
 posure (air, water,  dermal, and indirectly, food)  and their relative
 contribution to total human exposure.

 AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
 CL-PEST      PESTICIDES
 EA          EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 PB90-154832
 Municipal Haste Combustors—Background Information  for Proposed
 Standards
 EPA,  Research  Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 Radian Corporation
 Aug 89,  1237p  in 5 volumes, EPA-450/3-89-027A-E, PC E99/MF  E99

 Abstract:   Set  Includes  PB90-154840  through PB90-1548815:  Volume  1  -
 Cost  Procedures  (PB90-154840,  PC A08/MF A01).   Volume  2 - lll(b) Model
 Plant  Description and Cost Report  (PB90-154857, PC A07/MF A01).  Vol-
 ume 3  -  Post-Combustion  Technology Performance  (PB90-154865, PC A14/MF
A01).   Volume  4  - Control  of  NOx Emissions (PB90-154873, PC A06/MF
AOij.   Volume  5  - Guidelines  for Existing Facilities  (PB90-154881  PC
A22/MF A01) .

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW  SRC PRFRMNCE  STD
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
<9          ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS

-------
PB90-154907
Economic Impact of Air Pollutant Emission Standards for New Municipal
Naat* Ccobuator*
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Research Triangle In*t.
G.E. Morris, et al.
Aug 89, 166p, EPA-450/3-89-006, PC A08/MF A01

Abstract:  The U.S. EPA plan* to propose New Source Performance Stan-
dard*  (NSPSa) for air emissions from new municipal waste coabustors
(IWCa) In late 1989.  Affected plant* Include all MIC plants that are
placed under construction after regulations are proposed in the Feder-
al Register.  The regulations will affect the number of plants built
and the cosibustion technology selected.  The regulations will also
significantly affect the cost of owning and operating these new
plants.  The report use* three economic scenarios to examine the eco-
nomic impact of the five regulatory alternatives under most active
consideration by EPA.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HSPS        HEN SRC PRFBMNCE STD
49          ELECTRIC, GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
PB90-154915
Municipal Impact Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Standards and
Guidelines for Municipal Haste Combustors
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
J. Robson, B. Madariaga, and T. Maiton
Oct 89, 171p, PC A08/MF A01

Abstract:  The EPA, under the authority of Clean Air Act lll(b) and
(d), proposes to regulate air pollutant emissions from new and exist-
ing municipal waste combustors  (MICs).  MMC emissions cause, or con-
tribute significantly to, air pollution that endangers public health
and welfare.  The Standards and Guidelines require the reduction of
emissions to the air of organic compounds  (principally dioxina and
furans), metals (cadmium, mercury, chromium, lead, nickel, etc.), acid
gases  (sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, etc.), nitrogen oxides, and
carbon monoxide.  The Standards identify these pollutants as MMC emis-
sions and nitrogen oxides.  MtfC emissions consist of MHC organics,
MHC metals,  and MHC acid gases.  MMC emissions is the designated pol-
lutant that triggers application of lll(d); the Guidelines do not ad-
dress nitrogen oxides.  Currently, EPA new source review permitting
directives to the states recommend control of most of these pollutants
at new, large MHCs.

CL-ACID     ACIDIC COMPOUNDS INCLUDING ACID GASES
CL-DIOXIN   DIOXINS
CL-FURAN    FURANS
CL-LEAD     LEAD COMPOUNDS
CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE STD
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
630-08-0    CARBON MONOXIDE
7439-97-6   MERCURY
7440-02-0   NICKEL
7440-43-9   CADMIUM
7440-47-3   CHROMHM
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE
7647-01-0   HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

-------
to
M
ro
         PB90-155573
         Characterization of Population and Usage of Unvented Kerosene Space
         Heater*
         EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AKERL
         Applied Management Sciences, Inc.
         J. Barnes, P. Holland, and P. Mihlmester
         Jan 90,  7Sp, EPA-600/7-90-004, PC A04/MF A01

         Abstract:  The report give* result* of a study of the market  penetra-
         tion of unvented kerosene space heaters (UKSHs)  in the residential
         sector.   The study vas aimed at gathering baseline information to help
         assess the magnitude and potential severity of a problem involving
         emissions from unvented appliances,  one of a number of synergistic
         factors affecting indoor air quality.   UKSHs can be a significant
         source of such emissions.  UKSH usage patterns were also investigated.
         Annual sales of UKSHs are estimated at 825,000 units.   Leading brands
         include convective units marketed by Toyotomi USA (kero-Sun)  and
         Corona USA.  Some units contain built-in catalytic filters  for odor
         control.   Add-on catalytic filters are available from at least one
         manufacturer.  It is believed that 15-17 million portable UKSHs have
         been sold in the U.S.  since the early 1970s.   However,  it is  estimated
         that,  in  the 1986-87 heating season,  there were  only about  7  million
         units in  use.  About half of these units are in  the South.  Depending
         on whether UKSHs are used as primary or secondary heating sources,
         they may  be used anywhere from 1 to 17 hours a day.   Eighty percent of
         UKSHs are used in multifamily dwellings and mobile homes.
EPA
IA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
INDOOR AIR
        PB90-160086
        Radon Reduction Techniques in Schools:   Interim Technical Guidance
        EPA, Washington,  DC,  ORP
        Oct 89, 56p,  EPA-520/1-89-020,  PC A04/MF A01

        Abstract:  The  guidance  contained in the document is based largely on
        research conducted in 1987 and 1988 in schools located in Maryland and
        Virginia.  Because school  design, construction and operation patterns
        vary considerably,  it is not  always possible to recommend 'standard'
        corrective actions that  apply to  all schools.  Therefore, the document
        covers background information on  radon and radon mitigation experi-
        ence, important  school building characteristics relative to radon en-
        try and aitlgatinn,- problem analysis, radon diagnostic tasting,  and
        radon mitigation  system  design and installation.

        CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY  DOC
        EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
        IA          INDOOR AIR
        10043-92-2  RADON
        15          GENERAL BUILDING  CONTRACTORS
        154         NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
        1542        NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION,  NEC
        82          EDUCATIONAL  SERVICES
        821         ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
        8211        ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
 PB90-161514
 Chromium Emissions from Comfort Cooling Towers:   Background Informa-
 tion for Promulgated Standard*
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 Jan 89,  90p,  EPA-450/3-87-010B, PC A05/MT A01

 Abstract:   A final rule for the control of hexavalent  chromium emis-
 sions from comfort cooling towers (CCT)  is being promulgated under
 authority of Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act.   The final
 rule prohibits both the use of Cr(+6)  in CCTs and the  distribution in
 commerce of CR(+6) for use in CCTe.  The rule would apply  to existing
 and new  CCTs.   The document contains a summary of changes  to the rule
 made since proposal,  a summary of the  Impacts of the promulgated rule,
 and a summary of the public comments on the proposed rule  and EPA's
 responses.

 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE  STD
 7440-47-3   CHROMIUM

 PB90-169954
 OAQPS (Office  of Air Quality  Planning  and Standards) Control  Cost
 Manual  (Fourth Edition)
 EPA,  Research  Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 H.M.  Vatavuk
 Jan 90,  282p,  EPA-450/3-90-006, PC A13/MP A02

 Abstract:  The Manual  compiles  up-to-date capital costs,  operating and
 maintenance expenses,  and other costs for 'add-on' air pollution con-
 trol  systems and provides a comprehensive, concise, consistent, and
 easy-to-use procedure  for estimating and  (where appropriate) escalat-
 ing these costs.   ('Add-on' systems are those installed downstream of
 an  air pollution  source to control its emissions).  The Manual esti-
mating procedure  rests on the notion of the 'factored'  or 'study'
estimate, nominally accurate to within + or - 30%.  This type of esti-
mate  is well suited to estimating control system cost* Intended for
use in regulatory development.  Study eitimate* are sufficiently accu-
rate, yet do not require the detailed,  site-specific data inputs
needed to make definitive or other more accurate types of estimates.
                                                             CT
                                                             EPA
                                                                                     CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                     KEG DEVELOP™— GUIDE

-------
fo
 I
 PB90-171778
 Guidelines for Conducting the AKKRA  (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Re-
 sponse Act)  TIM (Transmission Electron Microscopy) Clearance Test to
 Determine Completion of an Asbestos Abatement Project
 IPA, Washington,  DC,  OTS
 Chesson  Conaulting
 J.  Chesson,  et al.
 Hay 89,  31p,  EPA-560/5-89-001, PC A03/MF A01

 Abstract:   Asbestos  abatement carried out in schools is subject to
 regulations under the Aabestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986
 (AHERA).   The AHERA  rule (40 CFR Part 763) includes procedures for de-
 termining when an asbestos abateatent cite is sufficiently clean for
 the containment barriera to be removed.  After the abatement site has
 been subject  to a thorough visual inspection, air samples are col-
 lected.   In Boat  cases,  the samples must be analyzed by transmission
 electron microscopy  (TKM).  The document provides guidance for con-
 ducting  the TEM clearance test with emphasis on interpretation of the
 results.   The three  components of the test, the Initial Screening
 Test, the Blank Contamination Teat, and the Z-test, are described and
 Illustrated with  numerical examples.

 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR
 PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
 1332-21-4   ASBESTOS
 82          EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
 821         ELEMENTARY  AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
 8211        ELEMENTARY  AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
                                                       How Hell  Is  It Working.
PB90-173469
Inside Story:  A Guide to Indoor Air Quality
Risk Communication Series
EPA, Washington, DC, OPPE
D. Synstelien
Jan 90, 56p, EPA-230/01-90-073, PC A04/MF A01

Abstract:  The O.S. EPA and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commis-
sion developed a booklet entitled 'The Inside Story:  A Guide to In-
door Air Quality,' designed to provide information for the general
public.  The report describes the small scale evaluation of the effec-
tiveness of the booklet.  The study appears to be one of the first at-
tempts to determine how Information materials requested by households
actually are used by them.  The evaluation examined the share of re-
queatera who read the booklet; changes in their knowledge about indoor
air pollution causes, and knowledge about testing and mitigation.  The
evaluation aleo asked whether respondents had tested or taken action
to reduce their exposure to indoor air pollution.

CL-IAP      INDOOR AIR POLLUTANTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
RC          RISK COMMUNICATION
                                                                                  PB90-17830?
                                                                                  Communicating Radon Riak Effectively:  A Mid-Course Evaluation
                                                                                  EPA, Washington, DC, OPA
                                                                                  V.K. Smith, et al.
                                                                                  Jul 87, 244p, EPA-230/07-87-029, PC All/MF A02

                                                                                  Abstract:  A panel of 2300 homeowners waa divided into subgroups to
                                                                                  test the effectiveness of six alternative ways of explaining the risk
                                                                                  from naturally occurring radon gas.  The research design focused on
                                                                                  two dimensions:  Qualitative va. quantitative and directive vs. evalu-
                                                                                  ative.  These characteristics led to 4 experimental booklets, which
                                                                                  were compared with EPA's Citizen's Guide and a one-page fact aheet.
                                                                                  The evaluation examined how much people learned about radon; whether
                                                                                  they could form risk perceptions consistent with their home's measured
                                                                                  radon level; and whether they felt they had enough information to make
                                                                                  a decision about mitigation.  The fact sheet did not perform well on
                                                                                  any of these evaluation criteria.  None of the five booklets clearly
                                                                                  was best for all 3 evaluation criteria; the report discusses the im-
                                                                                  plications for designing an affective radon risk communication pro-
                                                                                  gram.

                                                                                  EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  IA          INDOOR AIR
                                                                                  RC          RISK COMMUNICATION
                                                                                  10043-92-2  RADON
PB90-162197
Environmental Radiation Data:
EPA, Montgomery, AL, EERF
Dec 89, 45p, EPA-520/5-89-034, PC A03/MF A01
                                                                                                                 Report 58,  April-June 1989
Abstract:  Environmental Radiation Data  (ERD) contains data from the
Environmental Radiation Ambients Monitoring System  (ERAMS).  Data from
similar networks operated by contributing States, Canada, Mexico, and
the Pan American Health Organization are reported in the ERD when
available.  The ERAMS is comprised of nationwide sampling stations
that provide air, surface, and drinking water and milk samples from
which environmental radiation level* are derived.   Sampling locations
are selected to provide optimal population coverage while functioning
to monitor fallout from nuclear devices and other forms of radioactive
contamination of the environment.  The radiation analyses performed on
these samples include gross alpha and gross beta levels, gamma
analyses for fission products, and specific analyses for uranium,
plutonium, strontium, iodine, radium, krypton, and tritium.

AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
CL-RAD      RADIATION
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
7440-07-5   PLUTONIUM
7440-14-4   RADIUM
7440-24-6   STRONTIUM
7440-61-1   URANIUM
7553-56-2   IODINE

-------
ro
 i
         PB90-182544
         Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance Series.  Superfund Air Path-
         way Analyses Review Criteria Checklists
         EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
         Radian Corp.
         J.I. Letkeman
         Jan 90,  63p, KPA-450/1-90-001, PC A04/MF A01

         Abstract:   The IPA has responsibility for assessment and clean-up of
         Superfund sites.   Because air emission! pose a potential human health
         risk at  these sites,  the EPA has developed a set of procedures for
         evaluating these  risks.   The four checklists presented provide a
         systematic approach for air reviewers to apply the air pathway assess-
         ment procedures.   The background,  purpose,  and application of the
         checklists are discussed.
         IPX
         RA
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            RISK ASSESSMENT
PB90-182759
Handbook:  Hazardous Waste Incineration Measurement Guidance Manual.
Volume 3 of the Hazardous Haste Incineration Guidance Series
EPA, Washington, DC, OSNIR
Jun 89, 52p, EPA-625/6-89-021, PC A04/MF A01

Abstract:  The document provides general guidance to permit writers in
reviewing the measurement aspects of incineration permit applications
and trial burn plans.  It is oriented to how measurements are made,
not what measurements to make.  The guidance deals specifically with
commonly required measurement parameters and measurement methods for
process monitoring, sampling and analysis aspects of trial burns and
subsequent operation of the incinerator, and quality assurance/quality
control (QA/QC) associated with these activities.  As a guidance tool,
the document introduces the major elements of incineration measure-
ments via sample checklists,  general discussion, and technical
references.

KPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
 PB90-184367
 Air Emissions Species Manual.  Volume 2.  Particulate Matter Species
 Profiles.  Second Edition
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC
 Radian Corporation
 G.H.  Brooks,  J.T. Haddell, and H.A. Butler
 Jan 90,  784p,  EPA-450/2-90-001B, PC A99/MF E06

 Abstract:  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  has several
 activities that require speciated participate matter (PM)  or volatile
 organic compound (VOC)  profiles frost several source categories.  In an
 effort to update the available apeciated PM profile data base,  EPA
 initiated studies to update the 'Receptor Model Source Composition
 Library'  (EPA-450/4-85-002)  and produce a revision entitled 'Air Emis-
 sions Species  Manual -  Volume II,  Particulate Matter Species Profiles'
 (EPA-450/2-88-003b).   Similarly for VOC emissions,  EPA performed
 studies  to revise the 'Volatile Organic Compound Species Data Manual -
 Second Edition'  (EPA-450/4-80-015)  and provide an updated version in
 the 'Air Emissions Species Profiles'  (EPA-450/2-88-003a).   The  purpose
 of  the document is to update the PM profiles in the Air Emissions
 Species  Manual,  Volume  II with new information obtained from contacts
 with  principal researchers In the field of PM species  profiles  and
 source receptor modeling.   The profiles are based on data  voluntarily
 submitted by the researchers.

 CL-PM      PARTICULATE MATTER
 EF          EMISSION FACTOR
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 PB90-185422
 Compiling Air  Toxics  Emission  Inventories.   Second  Edition
 EPA,  Research  Triangle  Park, NC, OAQPS
 D.W.  Safriet
 Feb 90, 80p, EPA-450/4-86-010,  PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The report contains  technical materials  that will assist
 State  and local  control agencies in compiling air toxics emission in-
ventories.  It contains a discussion of varioua considerations that
 should be made in planning and  beginning an inventory and various
tools  an  agency  can use to locate potential sources and to estimate
emissions therefron.  The appendices contain the data needed to use
these  inventory tool* and some  example applications of them.

CL-HAPS     TITLE III HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
95          ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ROUSING
951          ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
9511        AIR, HATER,  I SOLID HASTE MANAGEMENT

-------
 PB90-185644
 Air Emi**lon* Specie* Manual.  Volume 1.  Volatile Organic Compound
 Specie*  Profiles.   Second Edition
 EPA,  Reaearch Triangle Park, NC
 Radian Corporation
 G.H.  Brook.,  J.T. Hadd.ll,  and W.A. Butler
 Jan 90,  640p,  EPA-450/2-90-001A, PC A99/MF A04

 Abstract:  The U.S.  EPA has several activities that require speciated
 particulate Batter  (PM)  or volatile organic compounds (VOC) profiles
 froai several  source  categories.  In an effort to update the available
 speciated  PM  profile data base, EPA initiated studies to update the
 'Receptor  Model  Source Composition Library' and produce a revision en-
 titled 'Air Emissions Species  Manual - Volume II, Particulate Matter
 Species  Profiles'.   Similarly  for VOC emissions, EPA performed studies
 to  revise  the 'Volatile Organic Compound Species Data Manual - Second
 Edition' and  provide an updated version in the 'Air Emissions Species
 Manual - Volume  I, Volatile Organic Compound Species Profiles',  the
 purpose  of the document is to  update VOC profiles in the Air Emissions
 Species  Manual,  Volume I.

 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 EF          EMISSION FACTOR
 EPA        ENVIROWJENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 PB90-186313
 Estimation of  Emissions from Charcoal Lighter Fluid and Review of
 Alternatives
 EPA, Research  Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
 Radian Corporation
 D.L. Campbell, and M.B.  Stockton
 Jan 90,  40p, EPA-600/2-90-003, PC A03/MF A01

 Abstract:  The report  gives results of an evaluation of emissions of
 volatile organic compounds  (VOCs) from charcoal lighter fluid,  a con-
 sumer product  consisting entirely of volatile constituents.  An esti-
mated 46,250 ton* (42,000 Mg)  of charcoal lighter fluid is used in the
U.S. each  year.  VOCs  contribute to the formation of ozone; therefore,
the ozone  nonattainment  issue  has focused attention on VOCs emitted
 from many  sources.  VOCs are emitted when charcoal lighter fluid is
used, but  these  emissions are  difficult to quantify.   Evaporative VOC
losses occur from the  lighter  fluid prior to ignition,  and combustion
VOC losses occur from  burning  lighter-fluid-soaked charcoal bri-
quettes.   The  study evaluates  tests conducted to date on charcoal
lighter  fluid emissions.  The  information is moat complete for evapo-
rative VOC losses.  The  estimates vary greatly,  however,  based on the
length of time between application of the lighter fluid and ignition.
The limited test* conducted to date have not distinguished lighter
fluid from charcoal briquette  combustion emissions.

CL-CONSOMR  CONSUMER PRODUCTS
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
PB90-186370
Remote Sensing of Hydrocarbon* and Toxic Pollutants:  Workshop
Minutes.  Held in Las Vega*, Nevada on April 6-7, 1989
EPA, La* Vega*, NV, EMSL
Nevada Univ., La* Vegas
F.F. Hall
Mar 90, 71p, EPA-600/9-90-009, PC A04/MF A01

Abstract:  A number of remote sensing techniques are now available for
•onitorlng hydrocarbons and toxic airborne pollutants.  Filter and
dispersive spectroradiometers  (line integral in ppb range; cost about
$3SK) with restricted versatility are sold commercially.  The more
versatile FTIR's (line integral in ppb range; coat $50-100K) and
DIAL'S  (range-resolve in ppm range; cost $100-200K) are now becoming
coemwrcially available.  Automatic, unattended field operation has
been successfully demonstrated for several types of such adaptable re-
mote sensing systems.  FTIR's and DIAL'S complement each other in
identifying a pollutant's presence and its spatial extent; there is
potential for Improving their performance by a factor of ten or more
in the next ten years.  Much of the promise for FTIR's lies in their
reliance on computer software and hardware to perform the frequency
analyses and to access the stored libraries of reference spectra.  If
avalanche photodiodes for the thermal infrared can be made feasible
for field work, there is a potential for an additional order of magni-
tude or more of performance improvement.  Rapid line-tuning will be
easier as the development of optical modulators for the infrared pro-
gresses.

AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
CL-HCARB    HYDROCARBONS
EPA         ENVIROWENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PB90-186438
Neurotoxic Effects of Controlled Exposure to a Complex Mixture of
Volatile Organic Compounds
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, HERL
D.A. Otto, et al.
Mar 90, 105p, EPA-600/1-90-001, PC A06/MF A01

Abstract:  Subjective reactions of discomfort,  impaired air quality,
irritation of aucosal membrane*, and impaired memory have been re-
ported in chemically sensitive subject* during exposure to VOCs found
in new buildings.  66 normal healthy male subjects aged 18-39 were ex-
posed for 2.75 hr* to a complex VOC mixture at 0 and 25 mg/cu m.  Each
subject completed control and exposure sessions at one week intervals
in counterbalanced order.  Measurements included comfort ratings of
eye, nose and throat irritation, symptom questionnaire and computer-
ized behavioral test*.  Subject* found the odor of VOC* unpleasant and
strong and reported that VOC exposure degraded air quality,  increased
headache and produced general discomfort.   VOC exposure did not affect
performance on any behavioral tests.  Results indicate that  subjective
reaction* to VOC* are not limited to chemically sensitive individual*
•ince the study population is a subgroup that is probably least likely
to be affected by chemical exposure.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR

-------
ro
M
a\
 PB90-187014
 Technical Assistance Document for Sampling and Analysis of Toxic
 Organic Compound*  la Ambient  Air
 BPA,  R*s«arch Triangle  Park,  NC,  AREAL
 ATC,  Inc.
 D.  Elam
 Feb 90,  133p,  IPA-600/8-90-005,  PC A07/MF  A01

 Abstract:   The guidance document was originally issued in June 1983.
 Sine* then significant  changes have occurred in the regulations that
 cover volatile and seaivolatile  organic air pollutants.  There have
 also been significant advances in the  collection and analysis of or-
 ganic compounds and  in  the quality and availability of calibration and
 QC  samples for them.  The present version  of the guidance document has
 been revised  to reflect these changes  so that  the new information can
 be  readily available to the monitoring community.  Because the docu-
 ment  covers regulatory  issues, sampling and analytical methods, moni-
 toring plan development and quality assurance  it will be useful to
 both governmental  and Industrial personnel concerned with monitoring
 the ambient air for  organic compounds.  It should be useful as an aid
 for planning  and establishing such air monitoring programs, but it
 should not  be used as the sole source  for  such a program.

 CL-SVOC     SEMTVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 RDG        REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
 SS          SOURCE SAMPLING

 PB.9Q-187055
 Methodology for Assessing Health Risks Associated with Indirect
 Exposure to Combustor Emissions
 EPA,  Cincinnati, OH,  ECAO
 Jan 90, 439p,  EPA-600/6-90-003,  PC A19/MF A03

 Abstract:   The methodology document seeks to provide risk assessors
 with  the guidance necessary to estimate the health risks that result
 from  exposure  to toxic  pollutants in combustor emissions by pathways
 other than  inhalation.  The organization of the  document reflects the
 four-step process of  risk assessment (hazard identification,  dose-
 response assessment,  exposure  assessment and risk characterization).
 The methodology is not  intended to be prescriptive;  that is,  it does
 not eessprise s s«t of guideline*  or recosssndad  approaches that ths
U.S. EPA believes should be applied in all  circumstances.   Rather,  it
provides a  set of procedures that the risk assessor can draw upon,
where applicable,  to  a  given assessment.   The document describes ana-
lytical procedures and  computer models that can  be used to estimate
exposure and risk by  a variety of environmental pathways.   In addi-
tion, it serves as a preliminary  source of data  for carrying out the
 risk calculations.   The degree of scientific support or uncertainty
 attendant to each calculation varies widely.  Therefore,  the appropri-
 ate use of  these procedures and the discussion of uncertainties sur-
 rounding the results  remain important responsibilities of the risk
 assessor.
 PB90-187949
 National Radon Measurement Proficiency (RMP)  Program:   Cumulative
 Proficiency Report,  January 1990
 EPA,  Washington,  DC,  ORP
 Research Triangle Inst.
 Jan 90,  382p,  BPA-520/1-90-001,  PC A17/MF A02

 Abstract:   The report is a complete listing of participants who met
 EPA's National Radon Measurement Proficiency (BMP)  Program require-
 ments during Test Round  6 conducted March-December  1989.   It is in-
 tended for use by Federal,  State,  and local officials,  radon measure-
 ment  companies, radon mitigation contractors,  concerned homeowners,
 and other  persons as an  aid in selecting  reliable sources of radon
 measurement services.

 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA           INDOOR AIR
 10043-92-2  RADON
 17           SPECIAL  TRADE CONTRACTORS
 179         MISC.  SPECIAL TRADE  CONTRACTORS
 1799         SPECIAL  TRADE CONTRACTORS, NEC

 PB90-188905
 Test  and Evaluation  of a Polymer Membrane Preconcentrator
 EPA,  Research  Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
 Radian Corp.
 K.E.  Hummel and T.P.  Nelson
 Apr 90,  171p,  EPA-600/2-90-016,  PC A08/MF A01

 Abstract:   The report  gives results  of an evaluation of the  applica-
 bility of membrane systems as a  preconcentrator and defines  operating
 parameters  of  a membrane system.  Advantages of such a system are  po-
 tential  reductions in  cost for subsequent  control systems.   The
 evaluation  is  part of  a  Joint EPA/California Air Resources Board in-
 vestigation of the potential of  membrane  technology on VOC emissions.
 Tests of various membrane materials  and configurations have  been con-
 ducted.  The polymeric membrane  has  been  used  for a number of years as
 a concentrating step  for various liquid and gaseous streams, including
 the removal of large molecule organics from waste water streams, hy-
 drogen separation, and C02 recovery.  A polymer membrane  is  an ultra-
 thin layer  of  a selective polymer, supported on a porous  sublayer.
 The membrane (active layer) selectively filters the pollutant mole-
 cules.  A potentially  innovative application of BeBbzan*  technology
may be to concentrate VOCs from exhaust gases such as solvent oven-
 drying exhaust.  A preconcentrator membrane could be used to reduce
the size and,  in turn, the capital and operating costs of a conven-
tional VOC  control device such as a  carbon adsorber or incinerator.
 Study results do not, however,  verify that a membrane preconcentrator
is a viable option to reduce overall pollution  control costs.

CL-SOLVENT  SOLVENTS
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        EPA
        RA
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            RISK ASSESSMENT

-------
fO

M
-J
 PB90-192006
 Field evaluation of a Righ Volume Surface Sampler for  Pesticides  in
 Floor Dust
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ARIAL
 Research Triangle Inst.
 W.T.  Budd,  J.W.  Robert*,  and M.G. Ruby
 Mar 90,  54p,  EPA-600/3-90-030,  PC A04/MF A01

 Abstract:   House dust end the pollutants carried with  it are  important
 contributors to total exposure through ingestion,  inhalation, and skin
 penetration,  especially for small children.  Pesticides may be one of
 the more Important contaminants of house dust.   The report describes
 a pilot  study conducted in 9  homes in Jacksonville, Florida,  which
 provides preliminary information on the pesticide content of  floor
 dust.  Both the  questionnaire developed for the  Nonoccupational Pesti-
 cide  Exposure Study (NOPBS) and • supplemental questionnaire  were ad-
 ministered in each household  to develop Information on pesticide  usage
 and other  variables that  might  be related to the floor dust samples.
 All samples were collected from carpeted surfaces.  The samples were
 analyzed for 33  pesticides by GC/ECD and GC/MS following the  HOPES
 standard procedures.  On  average,  7 to 8 target  pesticides were ob-
 served in  the indoor air  samples  and 11 to 12 in the floor dust.   The
 moat  consistently observed pesticides were chlorpyrifos, with a median
 concentration of about 5  ppm  in the dust,  and chlordane, with a median
 concentration of approximately  6  ppm.

 CL-PEST      PESTICIDES
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR
 2921-88-2    CHLORPYRIFOS
 57-74-9      CHLORDANE

 PB90-192014
 Field  Demonstration for Mobile  FT-IR for Detection of Volatile Organic
 Chemicals
 EPA, Las Vegas,  NV,  EMSL
 W-G. Fateley,  R.M.  Hammaker,  and  D.F.  Gurka
 Mar 90,  116p,  EPA-600/4-90-008, PC A06/MF A01

 Abstract:  A  mobile laboratory  is now available  to measure toxic com-
 pounds in the atmosphere.  The  mobility of the unit allows access to
 many sites in the continental United States.   When the laboratory
 arrives  at a  designated site, a high  resolution  Fourier transform
 (FT-IR)  instrument  is  used to measure  the toxic materials,  or volatile
 organic  compounds,  in  the  atmosphere.   The site  could be a landfill,
 lagoon,  industrial  site, chemical  spill or any area where atmospheric
 pollution occurs.   The FT-IR  instrument  is capable of identifying and
 quantifying atmospheric molecules  at the parts per billion (ppb)
 level.   The path  observed  by  the instrument could be as small as a few
meters,  or as  large  as 600 meters  in length,  nearly 2,000 feet.

AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  PB90-192790
                                                                                  Guides to Pollution Prevention:
                                                                                  EPA, Cincinnati, OH, RREL
                                                                                  Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
                                                                                  Feb 90, 61p, EPA-625/7-90-004, PC A04/MF A01
                                  The  Pesticide Formulating Industry
Abstract:   Pesticide  formulating facilities generate wastes during
such operations  as decontamination of mixing and storage equipment,
housekeeping,  and laboratory testing for quality assurance.  The
wastes  generated are:   containers with leftover raw materials, pesti-
cide dust  and  scrubber  water from air pollution control equipment,
volatile organic compounds,  off-specification products and laboratory
analysis wastes,  spills, waste  sands or clays, waste rinse water and
solvent, laundry wastewater,  and stormwater run-off contaminated with
pesticides.  Reducing the generation of these wastes at the source, or
recycling  the  wastes  on- or  off-site, will benefit pesticide manufac-
turers  by  reducing raw  material needs, reducing disposal costs, and
lowering the liabilities associated with hazardous waste disposal.

CL-PEST    PESTICIDES
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
287         AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
2879        AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, NEC

PB90-192915
Current Intelligence Bulletin 53.  Toluene Diisocyanate (TDI) and
Toluenediamine (TDA):   Evidence of Carcinogenicity
NIOSR
Dec 89, 29p, DHHS/PUB/NIOSH-90-101, PC A03/MF A01

Abstract:  Experimental studies in animals have demonstrated that
toluene diisocyanate  (TDI) is a carcinogen.  When rats and mice were
exposed orally to commercial-grade TDI (an 80:20 mixture of 2,4- and
2,6-TDI),  tumors were induced in both species.  The systemic nature of
TDI carcinogenicity was demonstrated by the appearance of tumors at
multiple sites (pancreas, liver,  skin,  mammary glanda,  and circulatory
system).   Although not  statistically significant,  rare brain tumors
were found in  rats exposed to TDI (two gliomas and one pinealoma).
Historical controls have a low  Incident of gliomas and no reported in-
cidence of pinealomas.  Experimental studies in animals have also
demonstrated that 2,4-toluenediamine (TDA), an hydrolysis product of
2,4-TDI, is a  carcinogen.  When rats and mice were exposed orally to
TDA, tumors were induced in the liver,  akin,  and mammary glands of
both species.  The potential for TDI- or TDA-induced cancer in humans
has not been determined, but the risk of developing cancer should be
decreased  by reducing exposure  to TDI and TDA in the workplace.
                                                                                 NIOSH       NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUP.
                                                                                 TT          TOXICITY TESTING
                                                                                 2S471-S2-5  TOLUENE  DIISOCYANATE
                                          SAFETY AND HEALTH

-------
fO
 I
PB90-194754
Industrial Mastewater Volatile Organic Compound Emissions.  Background
Intonation for BACT/LAER Determination*.
EPA, Research Triangle  Park, NC
Radian Corporation
J. Elliott and S. Natklns
Jan 90, 402p, EPA-450/3-90-004, PC A18/HF A03

Abstract:  The purpose  of the Control Technology Center (CTC) is to
provide technical information to States on estimating and controlling
volatile organic compounds  (VOC) emissions from the collection and
treatment of industrial wastewaters for Best Available Control Tech-
nology (BACT) and Lowest  Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) determina-
tions.  Technical guidance projects focus on topics of national or
regional interest that  are identified through contact with State and
Local agencies.  The document addresses new and modified major
sources,  as defined In  Parts C and D of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Steam stripping to remove the organic compounds in certain wastewater
streams at the point of generation (prior to contacting the atmo-
sphere) is the recommended control strategy.  The document presents a
description of the sources of organic containing wastewater,  VOC emis-
sion estimation procedures for treatment and collection system units,
and available VOC emission control strategies.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
 PB90-195736
 EIS (Environmental Impact Statement)  NESHAPS (National Emission
 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)  for Radionuclldes
 EPA,  Washington,  DC,  ORP
 Sep 89,  1732p In 4 volumes,  PC E99/MF E99

 Abstract:  The EPA is promulgating NESHAPs for radionuclides.   An EIS
 has been prepared in  support of the rulemaking.  The EIS consists of
 the following 3 volumes:   Vol.  1 - Risk  Assessment Methodology (PB90-
 195744,  EPA-520/1-89-005,  PC A12/MF A02).   The document contains chap-
 ters  on  hazard identification,  movement  of radionuclides through en-
 vironmental pathways,  radiation dosimetry,  estimating the risk of
 health effects resulting from exposure to low levels of ionizing radi-
 ation, and a summary  of the  uncertainties in calculations of dose and
 risks.   Vol.  2 -  Risk Assessments (PB90-195751, EPA-520/1-89-006-1,  PC
 A24/MF A03,  and Appendixes to Vol.  2,  PB90-195769,  EPA-520/1-89-006-2,
 PC  A16/MF A02).   The  document contains a chapter on each radionucllde
 source category studied.   The chapters Include an introduction,  cate-
 gory  description,  process  description, control technology,  health im-
 pact  assessment,  supplemental control  technology,  and cost.   It  has
 an  appendix which contains the  inputs  to all the computer runs used  to
 generate the risk assessment.   Vol. 3  -  Economic Assessment  (PB90-
 195777,  EPA-520/1-89-007,  PC A23/MF A03).   Each Chapter,  on  a  radionu-
 clide  source category studied,  includes  an  introduction,  industry pro-
 file,  summary of  emissions,  risk levels, the benefits and costs  of
 emission controls, and economic impact evaluations.

 CL-RAD       RADIATION
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 NESHAP       NATL  DOS  STD  HAZ AP
 10          METAL MINING
 109        MISCELLANEOUS METAL ORES
 1094        URANIUM-RADIUM-VANADIUM ORES
 14          NONMETALLIC MINERALS, EXCEPT FUELS
 147         CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER MINERALS
 1475        PHOSPHATE  ROCK
 28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
 281         INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
 2819        INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS, NEC
 286         INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS
 2869        INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS, NEC
 287         AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
 2874        PHOSPKATIC FERTILIZERS
 49          ELECTRIC,  GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
 493         COMBINATION UTILITY SERVICES
 4931        ELECTRIC AND OTHER SERVICES COMBINED
 495         SANITARY SERVICES
 4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
51          WHOLESALE TRADE-NONDURABLE GOODS
519         MISC.  NONDURABLE GOODS
5191        FARM SUPPLIES

-------
to
 PB90-200288
 Compendium of Method* for the Determination of Air Pollutants in
 Indoor Air
 CPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC, ARSAL
 Engineering Science
 H.T.  Ninberry, et al.
 Apr 90,  845p,  KPA-600/4-90-010, PC A99/MF E06

 Abstract:   Determination of pollutant* in indoor air is a complex task.
 because of the wide variety of compounds ofinterest and the lack of
 standardized sampling and analysis procedures.  To assist agencies and
 persons responsible for sampling and analysis of indoor pollutants,
 the methods compendium provides current, technically-reviewed sampling
 and analysis procedures in a  standardized format for determination of
 selected pollutants of primary importance in indoor air.  Each chapter
 contains one or More active or passive sampling procedures along with
 one or more appropriate analytical procedures.  The ten chapters of
 the compendium cover determination of  volatile organic compounds, nic-
 otine,  carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, air exchange rate, nitrogen
 dioxide, formaldehyde,  benzo(a)pyrene  and other polynuclear aromatic
 hydrocarbons,  acid gases and  aerosols, partlculate matter, and pesti-
 cides.   As  further advancements are made, the procedures may be modi-
 fied or updated,  or additional methods may be added as appropriate.

 CL-ACID     ACIDIC COMPOUNDS  INCLUDING ACID GASES
 CL-PAH       POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
 CL-PEST      PESTICIDES
 CL-PM        PARTICULATK MATTER
 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA           INDOOR AIR
 SA           SOURCE ASSESSMENT
 10102-44-0  NITROGEN DIOXIDE
 124-38-9    CARBON DIOXIDE
50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE
50-32-8     BENZO(A)PYRENE
54-11-5     L-NICOTINE
630-08-0    CARBON MONOXIDE
                                                                                  PB90-213B93
                                                                                  DEGADIS (DEnse GAs Dispersion) Model, Version 2.1.  User's Guide
                                                                                  EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
                                                                                  PEI Associates,  Inc.
                                                                                  T.O. Spicer and J.A. Havens
                                                                                  Nov 89, 427p,  EPA-450/4-89-019, PC A19/MP A03

                                                                                  Abstract:   An improved Jet -Plume model has been interfaced with
                                                                                  DEGADIS to provide for prediction of the trajectory and dilution of
                                                                                  elevated dense gas Jets to ground contact.  DEGADIS predicts the ensu-
                                                                                  ing ground-level plume dispersion.  The Jet-Flame model provides fori
                                                                                  automatic adjustment of integration step-size (using the Runge-Kutta-
                                                                                  Gill method as in DEGADIS) ; elliptical plume shape (cross-section) ,
                                                                                  with air entrainment specified consistent with the Pasquill-Gifford
                                                                                  plume dispersion coefficient representation of atmospheric turbulent
                                                                                  entrainment;  user specification of averaging time; ground reflection
                                                                                  when the plume (lower)  boundary reaches ground level; and application
                                                                                  to scenarios where the plume remains aloft .
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-215419
National Radon Contractor Proficiency  (RCP) Program.  Proficiency
Report
EPA, Washington, DC, ORP
ICF, Inc.
Jul 90, 18tp, EPA-520/1-90-017, PC A09/MF A01

Abstract:  The report will assist State, EPA Regions, and local gov-
ernment officials in providing advice to the public on the selection
of proficient radon mitigation contractors.  The Proficiency Report is
a listing of 895 contractors who have met the requirements of EPA's
National Radon Contractor Proficiency  (RCP) Program as of May 19,
1990.  Each contractor is listed by name, RCP identification number,
company name, address, phone number, and geographic service area.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON
17          SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
179         MISC. SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
1799        SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS,  NEC

-------
to
to
o
 PB90-216532
 Assessment of VOC Emissions from Fiberglass Boat  Manufacturing
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  AEERL
 Radian Corporation
 M.B.  Stockton and I.R. Kuo
 May 90,  lOlp,  BPA-600/2-90-019,  PC A06/MF A01

 Abstract:   The report  presents an assessment of volatile organic  coax-
 pound (VOC)  emissions  fro* fiberglass boat  manufacturing.  A descrip-
 tion  of the industry structure is presented, including estimates  of
 the number of facilities,  their size,  and geographic distribution.
 The fiberglass boat  manufacturing process is described, along  with
 sources and types of VOC emissions.   Model  plants representative  of
 typical facilities are also described.   Estimates of VOC emissions
 presented  on per  plant and national  bases.   VOC emissions from this
 industry consist  mainly of styrene emission from  gel coating and  lami-
 nation,  and acetone  or other solvent emissions frcn clean-up activi-
 ties.   Finally, potential VOC control  technologies are evaluated  for
 this  Industry,  including a discussion  of technical feasibility.
 Limited cost data are  also presented.

 CT           CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
 EPA         ENVIROHMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 SA           SOURCE ASSESSMENT
 100-42-5     STYRENE
 37           TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT
 373         SHIP  AND BOAT BUILDING AND REPAIRING
 3732         BOAT  BUILDING AND REPAIRING
 67-64-1      ACETONE

 PB90-216797
 Hospital Haste  Incinerator Field  Inspection and Source Evaluation
 Manual
 EPA, Washington,  DC, SSCD
 Midwest Research  Inst.
 S.  Smith, et al.
 Feb 69, 223p, EPA-340/1-89-001, PC A10/MF A02

Abstract:  The manual  summarizes the information necessary for con-
ducting field inspections  of  hospital waste incinerators.   The manual
is  intended  for use by Federal, State, and  local field inspectors.
The document presents  the  following information:   (a)  basic inspection
procedures,  (b) description:  of the typss of hospital  wast* incin«t-
ators,  (c)  descriptions of  air pollution control systems which might
be used on hospital incinerators, and  (d) inspection techniques for
hospital incinerators.   Inspection checklists also are provided.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIR01MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
49          ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
80          HEALTH SERVICES
806         HOSPITALS
 PB90-217084
 Guide for Determining Compliance with the Clean Air Act Standards for
 Radionuclide Emissions from NRC-Licensed and Non-DOE Federal
 Facilities.  (Revision 1)
 EPA,  Washington,  DC,  ORP
 Oct 90,  70p,  EPA-520/1-89-002,  PC A04/MF A01

 Abstract:   The report provides  guidance for determining compliance
 with one of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollu-
 tants (NESHAPs) covering facilities not operated by the DOE, that
 could emit Radionuclides to the Air.   (40 CFR 61,  Subpart 1).

 CL-RAD      RADIATION
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE

 PB90-218611
 Portable Instruments  User's Manual for Monitoring VOC Sources
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 PEI Associates, Inc.
 J.  Busik and M. Cunningham
 Jun 86,  144p,  EPA-340/1-86-015,  PC A07/MF A01

 Abstract:   The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  has  promul-
 gated New  Source  Performance Standards (NSPS)  and National Emission
 Standards  for Hazardous  Air Pollutants (NESHAP's)  for several  catego-
 ries  of  sources that  emit  volatile organic  compounds  (VOC's) and  that
 require  monitoring with  portable  detection  instruments.   The manual
 presents information  on  the principles of operation of currently
 available  portable monitors and the field inspection  techniques for
 the monitor's  safe use in  both  screening and compliance determina-
 tions.   The manual is intended  to be used by State  and local agencies.
 The level  of  the  Inspection performed  is often determined by the  com-
 pliance  history of the source and the  regulatory requirements.  The
 EPA has  published Reference Method 21  to provide a  technical method to
 test  for leaks from these  sources.  Method  21 allows  the  user to  se-
 lect  one of several instruments available on the market if they meet
the specifications and performance  requirements, discussed in Section
 2.  A summary of the published  specifications of many of the portable
VOC monitors is presented  in the manual.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         EnvIROwuNTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING

-------
K>
         PB90-222704
         Testing of Indoor Radon Reduction Techniques in Central Ohio Houses:
         Phase 2 (Winter 1988-1989)
         EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  AEERL
         Acres International Corp.
         N.O.  Pindlay, A.  Robertson,  and A.G.  Scott
         May 90, 299p, EPA-600/8-90-050,  PC A13/MT A02

         Abstract:   The report gives  results of tests of developmental indoor
         radon reduction techniques in nine slab-on-grada and four  crawl-space
         houses near Dayton,  Ohio.  The slab-on-grade tests  indicated that,
         when  there is a good layer of aggregate under the slab,  the  sub-slab
         ventilation (SSV)  mitigation  technique,  with only one or two auction
         pipes,  can generally reduce  Indoor concentrations below 2  pCi/L  (86 to
         99% reduction).   These reductions can be achieved even when:   there
         are forced-air supply ducts under the slab;  the slab is large (up to
         2600  sq ft);  and the foundation walls are hollow block.  Operating  the
         SSV system in suction always  gave greater reductions than  did operat-
         ing in pressure.   The crawl-space tests demonstrated that  depressurlz-
         ing under  a plastic liner over the crawl-space  floor was able to re-
         duce  living-area  radon concentrations below  2 pCi/L (81 to 96% reduc-
         tion) .   The performance of such sub-liner dapressurization gave better
         reductions than did crawl-space ventilation  (blowing air into, or out
         of, the crawl space).   Completely covering the  crawl-space floor with
         plastic sheeting  was not always necessary to get adequate  performance.

         CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY  DOC
         EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
         IA          INDOOR AIR
         10043-92-2  RADON
PB90-226614
Locating and Estimating Air Toxics Emissions from Sewage Sludge
Incinerators
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Radian Corporation
L. Lamb, C.B. Bricklay, and R. Dykes
May 90, B3p, EPA-450/2-90-009, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The document is intended to assist groups interested in
inventorying air emissions of various potentially toxic subatances
from sewage sludge incinerators.  Its intended audience includes
Federal, State and local air pollution personnel.  The document pre-
sents information on the process description of the various types of
sewage sludge incinerators and their air pollution control equipment.
Emission factors are presented for each major type of sewage sludge
incinerators for the following:  metals including arsenics, beryllium,
cadmium, chromium, and nickel; and organ!cs Including chlorinated di-
benzo-p-dtozins, dibenzofurans, benzene, chlorinated benzenes and
phenol.

CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
108-95-2    PHENOL
132-64-9    DIBENZOFURAN
262-12-4    DIBENZO-P-DIOXIN
49          ELECTRIC, GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4952        SEWERAGE SYSTEMS
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
71-43-2     BENZENE
7440-02-0   NICKEL
7440-38-2   ARSENIC AND COMPOUNDS AS AS
7440-41-7   BERYLLIUM
7440-43-9   CADMIUM
7440-47-3   CHROMIUM

-------
to
K>
         PB90-228610
         Available Model* for Estimating Emissions Resulting from Bioremedi-
         ation Processes:  A Review
         EPA,  Athena,  CA, ERL
         AQUA TERRA Consultant*
         S.  Sharp-Hanaen
         Mar 90,  275p,  IPA-600/3-90-031,  PC A12/MF A02

         Abstract:   The uae of bioremediation processes to treat hazardous
         waste has increased in the last 10 years.  Biological treatment offers
         the advantage of contaminant destruction  rather than transfer to other
         •edia.   There ia concern,  however,  that significant amounts of organic
         pollutants are emitted to the air fro* biological treatment activities
         before they can be degraded.  To estimate the magnitude of emissions
         from these facilities,  overall fate models that incorporate the ef-
         fects of several competing removal mechanisms are needed.  The report
         focuses  on the state-of-the-art in modeling air emissions from biore-
         mediation processes.   The biological treatment systems are described,
         as  are the important  pathwaya that affect the fate of organic pollu-
         tants in those systems.   Currently available models are identified,
         described,  and evaluated for each bioremediation process.  Finally,
         some  limitations of the models and the need for additional research
         are discussed.

         CL-ORGANIC ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
         EF          EMISSION  FACTOR
         EPA        BNVIROWflENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
         495        SANITARY  SERVICES
         4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
PB90-228B26
Municipal Haste Combustion  Multipollutant  Study,  Emission Test  Report.
Maine  Energy Recovery Company  Refuse  Derived Fuel Facility,  Blddeford
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC AEERL
Midwest  Research  Inst.
G.  Schell, et al.
Jul 89,  1358p in  3 volumes, EPA-600/8-89-064A-C,  PC E99/MF E99

Abstract:  Volume 1 - Summary  of Results  (PB90-228834, PC A08/MF A01).
The report gives  results of an emission test  for  a new municipal solid
waste  combustor in Biddeford,  ME that burns refuse-derived fuel and is
equipped with a lime spray  dryer fabric filter  (SD/FF) emission con-
trol system.  Control efficiency of the SD/FF emission control  system
was measured for  polychlorinated dibenzodioxins,  polychlorinated di-
benzofurans, particulate matter  (PM), cactalum, chromium, arsenic,
lead,  mercury, sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen chloride.  Additional
continuous monitoring was conducted for oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon
monoxide, nitrogen oxides,  and total hydrocarbons.  VoliBM 2  (PB90-228
842, PC  A25/MF A04) contains the data collected by methods described
in  Vol.  1, including analyses, tables, graphs, and results.  Volume  3
(PB90-228859, PC A99/MF A04) is a continuation of  Vol. 2, and contains
results, numerical analysis, tables, and graphs.

CL-DIOXIN   DIOXINS
CL-FURAN   FURANS
CL-HCARB   HYDROCARBONS
CL-LRAD     LEAD COMPOUNDS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
124-38-9    CARBON DIOXIDE
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
630-08-0    CARBON MONOXIDE
7439-97-6   MERCURY
7440-38-2   ARSENIC AND COMPOUNDS AS AS
7440-43-9   CADMIUM
7440-47-3   CHROMIUM
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE
7647-01-0   KYDROGEK CHLORIDE

-------
10
 I
to
         PB90-237116
         Risk Assessment, Management, Communication:   A Guide to Selected
         Source*.  Volume 3, Number 1
         EPA, Washington, DC, 01PM
         Mar 89, 125p, EPA-IMSD-89-004A, PC A06/MF A01

         Abstract:  Thl« la the ••Tenth update to the March 1987 publication
         entitled Riak Assessment, Management, Communication:  A Guide to
         Selected Source*.  Thi* *erle« of rlak manageaent bibliographies is
         divided Into three major sections:   assessment,  management,  communica-
         tion.  Included In the Issue are citations published between September
         1988 and March 1989.  The original guide was followed by three quar-
         terly updates.  These earlier updates constitute Volume One of the
         current semiannual series.
         EPA
         RA
         RC
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            RISK ASSESSMENT
            RISK COMMUNICATION
PB90-242314
Emission Factors for Iron and Steel Sources:  Criteria and Toxic
Pollutants
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
Pechan  (E.H.) and Associates, Inc.
H.R. Barnard
Jun 90, 173p, EPA-600/2-90-024, PC A08/MT A01

Abstract:  The report provides a comprehensive set of emission factors
for sources of both criteria and toxic air pollutants in integrated
iron and steel plants and specialty electric arc shops (mini-mills).
Emission factors are identified for process sources,  and process and
open source fugitive emissions.  The emission factors are not specific
to any one facility,  (mission factors for gray iron foundries and the
ferro-alloy industry are not Included.

CL-HAPS     TITLE III HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
33          PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
331         BLAST FURNACE AND BASIC STEEL PRODUCTS
3312        BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS
332         IRON AND STEEL FOUNDRIES
 PB90-244393
 Testing of Indoor Radon Reduction  Techniques  In  19 Maryland Houses
 EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
 CDM Federal Programs Corp.
 D.G. Gilroy and N.M. Kaschak
 Jun 90,  289p, EPA-600/8-90-056, PC A13/MF A02

 Abstract:   The report gives results of testing of indoor radon  reduc-
 tion techniques in 19 houses in Maryland.  The focus was on passive
 measures:   various passive soil depressurization methods, where natu-
 ral wind and temperature effects are utilized to develop suction in
 the system;  and sealing of radon entry routes into the  house.   Active
 (fan-assisted) soil depressurization techniques  were also tested.
 Passive  soil depressurization systems typically  gave moderate radon
 reductions (30-70%), although the  reductions  ranged from zero to 90%.
 Only two houses were reduced <4 pCi/L with the passive  systems.  A
 passive  system is most likely to be successful when sub-slab-communi-
 cation is  very good, when the house has a basement with no adjoining
 slab-on-grade or crawl-space wings, and when  the foundation walls are
 poured concrete instead of hollow  block.  Entry  route sealing as a
 stand-alone radon mitigation measure gave zero-50% reduction in the
 only house where it was tested.  Active soil  depressurization,  tested
 in  18 houses, reduced 16 of them <4 pCi/L, and 12 of them <2 pCi/L;
 reductions were often >90%.  Poor  sub-slab communication prevented
 this approach from being fully successful in  the other  two houses;
 later modifications to these two systems reduced these  houses <4 pCi/L
 also.

 CT           CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA           INDOOR AIR
 10043-92-2  RADON

 PB90-247453
 Evaluation of Strategies for Promoting Effective Radon  Mitigation.
 Risk Communication and Economic Research Series
 EPA, Washington,  DC, OPPE
 Colorado University at Boulder
 J.K. Doyle,  et al.
 Mar 90,  193p, EPA-230/02-90-075, PC A09/MF A02

Abstract:  The Environmental Protection Agency has estimated that as
many as  20,000 lung cancer death*  per year in the United States can be
 attributed to exposure to radon gas.  The report evaluates alternative
 strategies  for motivating people to test for radon gas  in their homes
 and to mitigate if necessary.   Specifically,  two separate radon in-
 formation  and awareness programs were evaluated,  one targeted to the
general population in the Washington,  D.C. area  and the other to home
buyers in the Boulder,  Colorado area.   The results suggest that a home
buyer program is likely to be far more effective In terms of effective
 remediation to reduce home radon levels than a program  aimed at the
general population.   The report discusses the empirical findings and
develops a recommendation for increasing the effectiveness of radon
awareness and mitigation program*.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
RC          RISK COMMUNICATION
10043-92-2  RADON

-------
 I
ro
PB90-247467
Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Clinical Manufacturing
Industry.  Background information for Promulgated Standard*
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Jun 90, 136p, EPA-450/3-83-005B, PC A07/MF A01

Abstract:  Standard* of performance for the control of volatile organ-
ic compound  (VOC) emission* from distillation unit operation* in the
synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry are being promul-
gated under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.  The*e standards will
apply to VOC emission* from newly constructed, modified,  and recon-
structed distillation unit*.  The document summarizes the responses to
public comment* received on the proposed standards and the basis for
change* made since proposal.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE STD
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS

PB90-24749S
Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry:  Background Information for Promulgated Standards
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Jun 90, 80p,  EPA-450/3-82-001B, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  Standard* of performance for the control of volatile organ-
ic compound (VOC) emissions from air oxidation processes  in the syn-
thetic organic chemical manufacturing industry are being  promulgated
under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.  These standards  will apply to
VOC emission* from newly constructed, modified,  and reconstructed air
oxidation processes.  The document summarizes the response* to public
comment* received on the proposed standards and the basis for changes
made since proposal.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE STD
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
PB9Q-250135
Measurements of Exhaled Breath Using a New Portable Sampling Method
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AREAL
Research Triangle Inst.
I.D. Pellixiari, et al.
Jul 90, 313p, EPA-600/3-90-049, PC A14/MF A02

Abstract:  Breath measurement* offer the potential for a direct and
noninvaalve evaluation of human exposure to volatile organic compound*
(VOC*) in the environment* in which people live and work.  The re-
search study was conducted to further develop the potential of this
exposure assessment methodology.  A new alveolar breath measurement
technique was developed and tested.  Air samples were collected in 32
microenvironments and above 6 consumer products to determine a few
potential source* of human exposures to selected VOCs.  Elimination
half-live* were estimated using a mono- and biexponential model.  The
alveolar breath collection and analysis methodology proved to be very
useful for collecting many samples in short time interval* and this
capability waa very important for accurately describing the Initial
phase of the decay curve*.  Analysis of microenvironment air samples
from hones, businesses, workplaces, vehicles, etc., revealed a wide
range of potential sources of human exposures to VOCs at concentra-
tions from 1 to 16,000 microg/cu m.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EA          EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

PB90-252495
Reactor Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry.  Background Information for Proposed Standards
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,  OAQPS
Jun 90, 391p, EPA-450/3-90-01CA,  PC A17/MF A03

Abstract:  Standards of performance for the control of volatile organ-
ic compound (VOC)  emissions from new,  modified,  and reconstructed re-
actor process units used in the manufacture of synthetic organic chem-
icals are being proposed under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.   The
document contains background information on the industry and processes
concerned and environmental and economic impact assessments of the
regulatory alternatives considered in developing the proposed stan-
dards.
                                                                                 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
                                                                                 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                 NSPS        NEW  SRC PRFRMNCE  STD
                                                                                 28          CHEMICALS AND  ALLIED PRODUCTS

-------
N>
 PB9Q-2549S8
 Evaluation of Emission Factor*  for Formaldehyde from Certain Wood
 Processing Operations.  Final Report, May-August 1989
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
 Radian  Corporation
 T.S.  Kbit*
 Jun  90,  33p,  EPA-600/8-90-052,  PC A03/MT A01

 Abstract:  The report  gives results of a search for information on
 formaldehyde  emissions from wood veneer operation*, to develop emis-
 •ion  factor*  for the industry.  Formaldehyde releases of 246 kg were
 reported under Title 111 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
 tion  Act  (SARA) of 1986 frost a  large plywood plant in Mississippi.
 However, existing  data found during the study period were insufficient
 to allow reliable  emission factor* to be calculated.

 KF          EMISSION FACTOR
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 24          LUMBER AND HOOD PRODUCTS
 243         MILUfORK,  PLYWOOD « STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
 2435        HARDWOOD VENEER AND PLYWOOD
 2436        SOFTWOOD VENEER AND PLYWOOD
 50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE

 PB90-255662
 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series.  Development
 of Example Procedure*  for Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil
 Excavation Associated  with Superfund Remedial Action*
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
 PE1 Associates, Inc.
 G.L.  Saunders
 Jul 90,  80p,  EPA-450/4-90-014,  PC A05/MF A01

 Abstract:  The purpose of the project was to identify and define the
 computation requirements for estimating the air impacts from the re-
 mediation of  Superfund sites.   Two example sites employing soil ex-
 cavation were selected because  they represent a complex emission
 source.  The  procedures for the evaluation of the ambient impacts were
 divided into  several subtasks.  These included site characterization,
 selection of  remedial  alternatives,  definition of remedial activities,
 estimation of emission rates for each remedial activity,  determination
 of ambient concentrations from  dispersion modeling, and evaluation of
 carcinogenic  and noncarcinogenic risks based on dispersion modeling
 results.  The calculation of emission rates were used to estimate am-
bient impacts through  dispersion models.  The purpose was to outline a
 set of procedures that  could be used,  with existing tools,  to assist
 in the evaluation of air-pathway effects.

CL-HAZWAST  HAZARDOUS WASTES
DM          DISPERSION MODELING
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 RA          RISK ASSESSMENT
 RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
 SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
                                                                                  PB90-256405
                                                                                  Guides to Pollution Prevention:
                                                                                  EPA, Cincinnati,  OH, RREL
                                                                                  Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
                                                                                  Jun 90, 74p,  EPA-625/7-90-005, PC A04/MF A01
                                 The Paint Manufacturing Industry
Abstract:  Paint manufacturing facilities generate large quantities
of both hazardous and nonhazardous wastes.  These wastes are:  equip-
ment cleaning wastewater and waste solvent, filter cartridges, off-
spec paint, spills, leftover containers; and pigment dusts from air
pollution control equipment.  Reducing the generation of these wastes
at the source, or recycling the wastes on- or off-site, will benefit
paint manufacturer* by reducing raw material needs, reducing disposal
costs; and lowering the liabilities associated with hazardous waste
disposal.  The guide provide* an overview of the paint manufacturing
processes and operations that generate waste and presents options for
minimizing the waste generation through source reduction or recycling.

CL-HAZWAST  HAZARDOUS WASTES
CL-SOLVENT  SOLVENTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
285         PAINTS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
2851        PAINTS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS

PB90-256413
Guides to Pollution Prevention:  The Printed Circuit Board
Manufacturing Industry
EPA, Cincinnati, OH, RREL
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Jun 90, 84p, EPA-625/7-90-007, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The guide identifies and analyzes waste minimization
methodologies appropriate for the printed circuit board manufacturing
industry.  The wastes resulting from printed circuit board manufactur-
ing are associated with five types of processes:  cleaning and surface
preparation; catalyst application and electroless plating; pattern
printing and masking; electroplating; and etching.  The wastes them-
selves Include airborne particulates, spent acids and alkaline solu-
tions, spent solvents, spent plating baths, waste rinsewater, and
other wastes.  The guide also presents a set of detailed waste minimi-
zation assessment worksheets suitable for use by shop manager* and
engineers, or by outside consultant*, to formulate a waste minimiza-
tion strategy for the particular plant.  Finally,  case histories of
waste minimization assessments performed at three plants are given.

CL-ACID     ACIDIC COMPOUNDS INCLUDING ACID GASES
CL-ALKYLPB  ALKYL LEAD COMPOUNDS
CL-HAZWAST  HAZARDOUS WASTES
CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
CL-PM       PARTICOLATE MATTER
CL-SOLVENT  SOLVENTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
36          ELECTRONIC « OTHER ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
367         ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES
3672        PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS

-------
PB90-256421
Guides to Pollution Prevention:  Selected Hospital Haste Streams
BPA, Cincinnati, OH, RREL
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Jun 90, 52p, EPA-625/7-90-009, PC A04/MT A01

Abstract:  The hazardous wastes generated by general medical and sur-
gical hospitals are small in volume relative to those of industrial
facilities; however, the wastes are of a wide variety.  Some of the
hazardous materials used by hospitals that become part of their waste
streams include chemotherapy and antlneoplastic chemicals, solvents,
formaldehyde, photographic chemicals, radionuclides, mercury, waste
anesthetic gases; and other toxic, corrosive and miscellaneous chemi-
cals.  Additional wastes such as infectious waste, incinerator ex-
haust, laundry-related waste, utility wastes, and trash were not ad-
dressed in the guide.  Reducing the generation of these materials at
the source, or recycling the wastes on- or off-site, will benefit
hospitals by reducing disposal costs and lowering the liabilities
associated with hazardous waste disposal.  The guide provides an over-
view of hospital waste generating processes and presents options for
minimizing waste generation through source reduction and recycling.

CL-CHSMOTH  CHEMOTHERAPEUTICS
CL-HAZWAST  HAZARDOUS HASTES
CL-PHARM    PHARMACEUTICALS
CL-RAD      RADIATION
CL-SOLVXNT  SOLVENTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION
50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE
7439-97-6   MERCURY
80          HEALTH SERVICES
806         HOSPITALS
PB90-257767
Engineering Design Criteria for Sub-Slab Depressurization Systems
in Low-Permeability Soils
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
Southern Research Inst.
C.S. Fowler, et al.
Aug 90, 94p, EPA-600/8-90-063, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The report describes the development of engineering design
criteria for the successful design, installation, and operation of
sub-slab depressurization systems, based on radon (Rn) mitigation ex-
perience on 14 slab-on-grads houses in South Central Florida.  The
Florida houses are characterized as being hard to mitigate because of
low sub-slab permeabilities.  Premitigation indoor Rn concentrations
ranged from 10 to 100 pCi/L.  Mitigation experience and results have
been combined into tables and graphs that can be used to determine
recommended numbers and placement criteria for suction holes.  Fan and
exhaust pipe size selection is assisted by other tabulated and derived
information.  Guidance for installation of the sub-slab system to en-
hance the system's operation and effectiveness is also provided.  This
guidance is reported in the form of a design manual for use by mitiga-
tors when they are dealing with houses similar to these.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON

PB90-257791
Radon Mitigation Studies:  Nashville Demonstration
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
Southern Research Inst.
B.E. Pyle and A.D. Williamson
Jul 90, 283p, EPA-600/8-90-061, PC A13/MF A02

Abstract:  The report gives results of an EPA radon mitigation demon-
stration project involving 14 houses in the Nashville, TN,  area with
indoor radon levels of 5.6-47.6 pCi/L, using a variety of techniques,
designed to be the most cost effective methods possible to implement,
and yet adequately reduce radon levels to < 4 pCi/L.  For crawl space
houses, the techniques included sealing openings between living areas
and crawl spaces and then passively venting the crawl spaces, depres-
surizing the crawl spaces, depressurizing under polyethylene sheeting
in the crawl spaces,  and depressurizing the crawl space soil itself.
For basement and basement/crawl space combination houses,  the tech-
niques Included sub-slab pressurization and depressurization, block
wall depressurization, and combinations of these techniques with some
of those listed above Cor exposed soil areas.  Post-mitigation worst-
case radon levels in these houses were generally from < 1 to about 5
pCi/L, wiht one house near 15 pCi/L.  These houses are currently being
followed with alphatrack detectors to assess the long term exposure
levels.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON

-------
 PB90-259714
 BACT/LUR Clearinghouse:   A Compilation of Control Technology
 Determination*
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC, OAQPS
 PIT Associates,  Inc.
 Jun 90,  1630p in 4  volumes,  IPA-4SO/3-90-015A-0, PC E99/MF E99

 Abatract:   Volume 1 - Report  Summary and Appendices A-G  (PB90-259722,
 PC A10/MT  A02);  Volume 2  - Appendix H, Source Codes 1-3  (PB90-259730,
 PC A17/MF  A02);  Volume 3  - Appendix H, Source Codes 4-6  (PB90-2S9748,
 PC A23/MF  A03);  Volume 4  - Appendix H, Source Codes 7-12  (PB90-2S97S5,
 PC A21/MF  A03).   The  Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 prescribes sev-
 eral  technology-based limitations affecting new or aodified air pollu-
 tion  sources:   (1)  new source performance standards (NSPS); (2) best
 available  control technology  (BACT); and (3) lowest achievable emis-
 sion  rate  (LAIR).   The basic  purposes of the BACT/LAER Clearinghouse
 are to:   (1)  provide  State and local air pollution control agencies
 with  current  information  on case-by-case control technology determina-
 tions that are made nationwide and  (2) promote communication,  coopera-
 tion, and  sharing of  control  technology information among the permit-
 ting  agencies.   The information presented in this compilation was ab-
 stracted from preconstruction permits and submitted voluntarily by the
 State and  local  air pollution control agencies.  The Clearinghouse is
 intended as a reference for State and local air agencies in making
 BACT/LAER  decisions.   This report is the 5-year compilation containing
 all determinations  inserted or updated since June 1985.
CT
EPA
RDC
CHTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
PB90-259862
Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Public Review Draft
EPA, Washington, DC, OAR
Jun 90, 80p, EPA-400/6-90-004, PC A05/MF A01
                  A Guide to Workplace Smoking Policies.
Abstract:  The publication is designed to help the non-expert under-
stand the technical basis for smoking restrictions and to provide
guidelines for implementing them.  It explains the physical and chemi-
cal nature of Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS), how ETS exposure oc-
curs, how it is measured, and the health effects of exposure.  It
examines passive smoking in the workplace and other sites, and exam-
ines legislative, legal, financial, educational and labor concerns.
It includes different strategies for reducing exposure to smoking at
the workplace along with the case studies of policies that have been
successfully implemented.  Finally it contains a list of resources for
those interested in additonal Information.

CL-ETS      ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
PB90-259870
Analysis of Air Toxics Emissions, Exposures, Cancer Risks and Control-
lability in Five Urban Areas.  Volume 2.  Controllability Analysis and
Results
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
J. Nilaon, et al.
Apr 90, 107p, EPA-450/2-89-012B, PC A06/MF A01

Abstract:  The report (Volume 2) is the second phase of a study to de-
fine the urban air toxics problem and to discern what combination of
control measures can best be employed to mitigate the problem.  Volume
1 of the study documented the base year analysis (nominally the year
1980),  involving dispersion modeling of emissions data for 25 carcino-
genic air toxics in five U.S. urban areas and a subsequent assessment
of estimated aggregate cancer incidence.  The Volume 2 report applies
various control strategies and analyzes the resulting reduction in
aggregate cancer incidence that would occur between 1980 and 1995.
Control scenarios consisted  (1) efforts that were currently underway
to reduce air toxics emissions at the time of the study, (2) efforts
that were expected to occur by 1995, mainly national standards that
were under development,  and  (3) a series of selected more rigorous
controls.

CL-ALDEKTD  ALDEHYDES
CL-CHC      CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
CL-PAH      POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RA          RISK ASSESSMENT
106-99-0    BUTADIENE,1,3-
50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE

-------
ro
 i
ro
CO
 PB90-259888
 Idaho Radionuclide Study (Radionuclide  Exposure  Study, Pocatello and
 Soda Springs,  Idaho)
 EPA,  Las Vegas,  NV,  ORP
 Apr 90, 57p,  EPA-520/6-90-008,  PC A04/MF A01

 Abstract:  The report  give* the results of a radionuclida exposure
 study conducted  by EPA in southeastern  Idaho to  estimate the radiation
 dose resulting from the elemental phosphorus industry.  The dispersion
 of radionucllde* through the environs of Pocatello and Soda Springs,
 Idaho were investigated together with the relative importance of their
 sources and pathways affecting  the populations of both towns and the
 magnitude of  the attendant  risks.  Gamma ray exposures to the popula-
 tions of Soda Springs  and Pocatello, with the attendant risks, and the
 corresponding value* for average and maximally exposed individuals in
 both comnunitles are listed.

 CL-RAD     RADIATION
 EA         EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 13981-52-7  POLONIUM-210
 14         NONMETALLIC MINERALS, EXCEPT FUELS
 147        CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER MINERALS
 1475        PHOSPHATE  ROCK
 28         CHEMICALS  AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
 281        INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
 2819        INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS,  NEC

 PB90-261561
 Development of Risk Assessment  Methodology for Surface Disposal  of
 Municipal Sludge
 EPA,  Cincinnati, OH, ECAO
 Aug 90, 255p,  EPA-600/6-90-001,  PC A12/MF A02

 Abstract:  This  is one of a series of reports that present methodolo-
 gies  for assessing the potential risks to humans or other organisms
 from  the disposal or reuse  of municipal sludge.   The sludge management
 practices addressed by the  series include land application practices,
 distribution and marketing  programs,  landfilling, surface disposal,
 Incineration and ocean disposal.  In particular,  these reports provide
methods for evaluating potential health and environmental risks from
toxic chemical* that may  be present in sludge.   The document addresses
risk* from chemical* •••ociated with surface disposal of municipal
sludge.  These proposed risk assessment procedures are designed as
tool* to assist in the  development of regulations for sludge manage-
ment practices.  The procedures are structured to allow calculation of
technical criteria for  sludge disposal/reuse options based on the po-
tential for adverse health  or environmental  impacts.   The criteria may
address management practices  (such a* site design or process control
specifications),  limits on  sludge disposal rate* or limits on toxic
chemical concentrations in  the  sludge.

CL-SEWSLUD  SEWAGE SLUDGE
EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RA          RISK ASSESSMENT
49          ELECTRIC, CAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4952        SEWERAGE SYSTEMS
PB90-261652
Health Effect* of Passive Smoking:  Assessment of  Lung Cancer In
Adults and Respiratory Disorders in Children
EPA, Washington, DC, OHEA
K.G. Brown
May 90, 280p, EPA-600/6-90-006A, PC A13/MF A02

Abstract:  The draft document addresses the scientific, mostly epide-
miologic, evidence on the potential association between passive smok-
ing or Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) and lung  cancer  in  nonsmoking
adult*, and respiratory disorders in children.  With respect to lung
cancer in adults the draft report concludes that ETS is causally as-
sociated with lung cancer in nonsmoking adult* and that according to
EPA guideline* for carcinogen risk assessment, ETS is  a Group A (known
human) carcinogen; and that approximately 3800 lung cancer deaths per
year among nonsBokers (never-mokers and former smokers)  of  both sexes
in the United States are attributable to ETS.  Hith respect  to respi-
ratory effect* in children,  ETS exposure from parental  smoking,  espe-
cially during infancy,  is associated with increased prevalence of
acute lower-respiratory tract infections (bronchitis and  pneumonia),
symptoms of irritation (cough,  sputum,  wheeze), and middle ear effu-
sions (a sign of chronic middle ear disease).  It  also  concludes that
ETS is associated with reduced lung function and with a small  reduc-
tion in the rate of pulmonary growth and development in children of
mothers who smoke during their early childhood.

CL-ETS      ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HA          HEALTH ASSESSMENT

-------
         PB90-263013
         Characterization of Kerosene Heater Emissions Inside Two Mobile Hones
         EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC,  ARKAL
         R.M.  Burton,  et al.
         Mar 90,  10p,  EPA-600/D-90-115,  PC A02/MF A01

         Abstract:   In an effort to determine the impact  of kerosene heater
         emissions  on indoor air quality,  measurements were made in and around
         two mobile homes at a rural mobile home park near Apex,  NC.   The samp-
         ling  was performed at two single-wide mobile homes equipped with kero-
         sene  heaters.  The concentrations of acidic aerosols and gases,  fine
         and coarse particulate aerosol  mass,  carbon monoxide,  nitrogen oxides,
         volatile organic compounds and  semivolatlles,  were determined for pe-
         riods of heater operation and for periods in which heaters were not
         operated.   Simultaneous outdoor measurements of  acid aerosols and
         gases,  fine and coarse aerosol  mass,  and volatile organic compounds
         were  conducted to determine the contribution of  outdoor pollutants to
         the indoor concentrations.   Comparisons between  the concentrations
         obtained from the analysis of outdoor,  heater-on,  and heater-off sam-
         ples  allowed the authors to examine the impacts  of the kerosene emis-
         sions on indoor concentrations.   Concentrations  of sulfatas,  aerosol
         strong acidity,  fine and coarse aerosol mass,  carbon monoxide,  and
         sulfur dioxide were found to be higher when the  heater was operated;
         however, these heater-on concentrations were comparable to those ob-
         served in  moderately polluted atmospheres.

         CL-ACID     ACIDIC COMPOUNDS INCLUDING ACID GASES
         CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
 I        CL-SVOC      SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
K»       CL-VOC     VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
10       EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         IA          INDOOR AIR
         630-08-0   CARBON MONOXIDE
         7446-09-5    SULFUR DIOXIDE
PB90-263179
Unvented Kerosene Heater Emissions  in Mobile  Hones:  Studies on Indoor
Air Particles, Semivolatile  Organics, Carbon  Monoxide, and Mutagenic-
ity
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,  HERL
J.L. Mumford, et al.
1990, lOp, EPA-600/D-90-122, PC A02/MF A01

Abstract:  The study was conducted  to assess  human exposure to air
pollutants from kerosene heaters  in mobile  homes.  An estimated 15-17
million unvented kerosene heaters have been sold in the U.S.; 33% of
these to mobile hone residents.   The emissions  can result in high pol-
lutants levels-in mobile homes that have a  small air volume and low
ventilation rate.  Indoor air exchange rate,  temperature, and humidity
were measured.  Chemical analyses,  including  polycyclic aromatic hy-
drocarbon  (PAH) and nitro PAH, also were performed on the indoor air
samples from a selected  home with the kerosene  heater on and off.  In-
creases in CO and organic concentrations were found in most homes mon-
itored.  Analyses also suggested  the presence of evaporated, unburned
kerosene fuel , 56% of the sampling days  (in  all homes) showed muta-
genic activity on the heater-off  days.  In  comparison with the U.S.
national ambient air standards, four out of the eight heaters investi-
gated emitted pollutants that exceeded the  ambient air standards some
days.  These data suggested  that  emissions  from unvented kerosene
heaters can significantly impact  indoor air quality in mobile hones
and that these emissions contain  carcinogenic compounds.

CL-CARCIN   CARCINOGENS
CL-PAH      POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
CL-PM       PARTICULATE  MATTER
CL-SVOC     SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
630-08-0    CARBON MONOXIDE
8008-20-6   NAVY FUELS JP-5

PB90-263989
EPA's Pollution Prevention R and  D  Approaches and Insights into the
Chemical Process Industry
EPA, Cincinnati,  OH,  RREL
P.M. Randall
Aug 90,  18p,  EPA-600/D-90-142, PC A03/MF A01

Abstract:   Chemical engineers face  major research challenges associ-
ated with the imperative  to protect and improve the environment.
These challenges include  designing  optimal, less polluting chemical
plants and processes,  improving air quality through research,  managing
hazardous wastes responsibly, and developing multimedia approaches to
reduce the chemical risk  to human health and the environment.   Since
1988,  the U.S.  EPA has established  a pollution prevention R and D pro-
gram to work with States, local governments,  regional and Federal a-
gencies,  and industry to  encourage  the Identification,  development and
demonstration of pollution prevention technologies and methods to re-
duce wastes.
CL-HAZNAST  HAZARDOUS HASTES
CL-SOLVENT  SOLVENTS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PP          POLLUTION PREVENTION

-------
NJ
 I
Id
O
 PB90-265349
 Interim Radon-Resistant Construction Guidelines  for Use in Florida-
 1989
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  AIERL
 Florida Agricultural and Mechanical Univ.
 T.D.  Pugh
 Aug 90,  29p,  EPA-600/8-90-062,  PC A03/MF A01

 Abstract:   The report gives results of a project to investigate, ana-
 lyze,  and  develop radon-resistant construction guidelines that are
 consistent with other building codes and that could be applied to
 Florida.   A literature search resulted in information on radon remedi-
 ation techniques,  new construction methods, and existing radon-resis-
 tant  building codes  such as those in Sweden and Canada.  The identi-
 fied techniques were amended,  modified,  or supplemented for incorpora-
 tion  into  draft model guidelines  for new construction in format con-
 sistent  with  the Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc.'s
 Standard Building Code.   A technical review advisory committee formed
 during development of the guidelines,  provided input and recommended
 changes  to the draft guidelines.   Although the project has resulted in
 guidelines for recommended construction practices, they should be
 coupled with  a carefully planned  and implemented program of experi-
 mentation.  Eventually,  this  approach will lead to building code pro-
 visions  that  are scientifically defensible, cost effective,  reliable,
 and easily incorporated into  standard construction practice.

 CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY  DOC
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR
 10043-92-2  RADON
 15          GENERAL  BUILDING  CONTRACTORS
 152         RESIDENTIAL  BUILDING  CONSTRUCTION
                                                        ind Toxic Pollutants
PB90-266743
Emission Factors for Iron Foundries:  Criteria
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
Pechan  (E.H.) and Associates, Inc.
G. Gschwandtner and S. Fairchild
Aug 90, 65p, EPA-600/2-90-044, PC A04/MF A01

Abstract:  The report lists criteria and toxic pollutant emission
factors for sources commonly found in gray and ductile iron foundries.
Emiaaion factors aire identified for process source and process fugi-
tive emissions.  The emission factors, representing uncontrolled emis-
sions,  may be used to estimate emissions when site-specific informa-
tion and data are not available.

CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
124-38-9    CARBON DIOXIDE
33          PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
332         IRON AND STEEL FOUNDRIES
3321        GRAY  AND DUCTILE IRON FOUNDRIES
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE
 PB90-270554
 Symposium on Regulatory Approaches for Reducing VOC Emissions from the
 Use  of Consumer Products,  November 14-15,  1989.   Proceedings
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 Jan  90,  128p,  EPA-450/3-90-008,  PC A07/MF  A01

 The  report documents  the proceedings of an EPA-sponsored industry-
 government symposium  held  in  Research Triangle Park,  North Carolina,
 on November 14-15,  1989.   The document presents an  overview of vola-
 tile organic carbons  (VOC)  regulatory programs, a status report on the
 Clean Air Act  amendments,  and discussions  of possible EPA control
 strategies for consumer products,  the use  of market-based approaches
 to the reduction of VOC emissions from the use of consumer products,
 and  EPA research in the area  of  consumer products.   Presented are  dis-
 cussions of industry's view of regulating  consumer  products and de-
 scriptions of  consumer product regulatory  activities in  New York,  New
 Jersey,  and California.  Presentations dealing with product testing
 and  the economic impacts associated with product  reformulation are
 also included.

 CL-CONSUMR  CONSUMER  PRODUCTS
 CL-SOLVENT  SOLVENTS
 EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 SA           SOURCE ASSESSMENT

 PB90-270588
 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance  Study Series.  Volume 2.
 Estimation of Baseline Air  Emissions at  Superfund Sites  (Revised)
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC, OAQPS
 Radian Corporation
 B. Eklund and C.  Schmidt
 Aug  90,  390p, EPA-450/1-89-002A, PC A17/MF A03

 Abstract:  The report presents available methods for estimating air
 emissions  at Superfund hazardous waste sites prior to any remedial
 action.  The report revises and expands an earlier report. Procedures
 For Conducting Air Pathway Analyses For Superfund Activities,  Volume
 II,  Estimation Of Baseline Air Emissions At Superfund Sites, EPA-450/
 1-89-002.  The purpose of the report is to assist  EPA Air and Super-
 fund  staff, State Air Superfund program staff,  Federal and State re-
medial and removal contractors, potentially responsible parties and
others in  designing, conducting,  and reviewing air pathway analyses at
undisturbed hazardous waste sites.

CL-HAZHAST  HAZARDOUS WASTES
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
M

10
 PB90-271909
 Summary Review of Health Effects Associated with Dlmethylamine:
 Health Issue Assessment
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC, ECAO
 Dynamac Corp.
 C.E.  Rothwell,  et al.
 Sep 90,  74p,  EPA-600/8-90-038F, PC A04/MF A01

 Abstract:   Chemical properties and tozicity studies for dimethylamine
 (DMA)  are  reviewed. At 25  C, DMA is a water-soluble, colorless,  flam-
 mable gas,  with both natural  and anthropogenic sources.  Body burden
 of DMA is  due to rapid absorption of inhaled or ingested DMA, along
 with  endogenous formation;  urinary excretion of unmetabolized compound
 is primary route of elimination.  Microsomal enzymes in nose and  liver
 convert  DMA to formaldehyde.  DMA in the stomach in presence of ni-
 trite and  acid conditions can be converted to nitrosamines.  Chronic
 inhalation studies in  2 or  more species indicate concentration-depen-
 dent  tozicity in nasal snicosa with no other tissues affected except
 small decrease in body weight at 175 ppm.  There is no evidence for
 carcinogenicity,  mutagenicity; there are no data on teratogenic or
 reproductive  effects.   Human  data available are limited to secondary
 reports  of eye irritation at  low concentration, with nose, throat, and
 lung  irritation at 100 ppm  DMA.  Skin or eye contact produces severe
 burns.   Further data are needed on ambient levels and human effects.

 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 HA         HEALTH ASSESSMENT
 124-40-3   DIMETHYLAMINE

 PB90-274077
 Identification  of Candidate Houses for the North Florida Portion of
 the Florida Radon Mitigation  Project
 EPA, Research Triangle Park,  NC, AEERL
 Florida  Univ.,  Gainesville
 G.S. Roessler,  et  al.
 Sep 90,  149p, EPA-600/8-90-070, PC A07/MF A01

Abstract:  The  report  gives results of a study to locate candidate
 houses for a proposed  radon mitigation research and demonstration pro-
 ject in  North Florida.  The effort involved:   identification of target
geographical areas,  radon monitoring in identified clusters,  and house
characterization.   Selection  of target areas with a potential for ele-
vated indoor radon started  with a review of a statewide radiation
study completed in 1987 and examination of the local geographic pat-
tern observed in a 1986-87  pilot study of the Gainesville area.  This
effort indicated that North Florida target areas could be selected on
the basis of the near-surface occurrence of the Hawthorn geological
 formation.   Volunteer houses  for radon monitoring in Alachua and
Marion counties were obtained by announcing the study in newspaper
articles.  Screening measurements were made in about 400 target area
houses according to EPA protocols using a vendor-supplied charcoal
collector method.  Results  were similar in the two counties,  and dis-
tributions were similar in  both slab and crawl-space houses.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON
PB90-274119
Radon-Resistant Residential New Construction
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AEERL
M.C. Osborne
Jul 88, 84p, EPA-600/8-88-087, PC A05/MF A01

Abstract:  The manual provides builders and potential new house buyers
with a broader selection and explanation of techniques that are ex-
pected to be effective in reducing the potential for elevated radon
levels in the house.  In addition, legislators, regulators, and resi-
dential code writers may choose to evaluate these radon-resistant con-
struction technologies for potential application to or modification of
existing regulations or codes applicable to residential construction.
Three approaches to resolving the radon problem in the construction of
new houses are to:  (1)  prevent radon entry by using barrier methods,
(2) reduce the radon entry driving forces, and (3) divert the radon
from the house through sub-slab ventilation.  Radon entry routes of
concern in new construction are the same as those that have previously
been identified for existing houses.  Figures provided in the report
depict the major radon entry routes for simple basement, slab-on-
grade, and crawl-space houses.  Expensive control measures may be
justified if they serve multiple purposes, such as combining radon
control with water control or eliminating the need for constantly
operating a mechanical control system through a high initial cost.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON
15          GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS
152         RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
                                                                                  PB90-274283
                                                                                  Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
                                                                                  Determination of Asbestos  in Ambient Air.
                                                                                  EPA,  Washington,  DC,  OERR
                                                                                  May 90,  121p,  EPA-540/2-90-005A,  PC A06/MF A01
                                           Superfund Method for the
                                           Part 1.  Method
                                                                                  Abstract:   The report  provides a sampling and analysis method for the
                                                                                  determination of asbestos in the air to provide results suitable for
                                                                                  supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites.  Part 2 presents the
                                                                                  technical  background and considerations addressed during the develop-
                                                                                  ment of the method.

                                                                                  EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
                                                                                  1332-21-4    ASBESTOS

-------
K>
PB90-274291
Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.  Superfund Mat hod for tha
Determination of Asbestos in Ambient Air.  Part 2.   Technical
Background
IPA, Maihington, DC, OERR
May 90, 106p, BPA-540/2-90-005B, PC A06/MF A01

Abstract:  Tha report provide* a campling and analyiis method for tha
detexmination of asbestos in tha air to provide results suitable for
•upporting riak assessments at Suparfund sites.  Part 1 preaents the
method to be used.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SS          SOURCE SAMPLING
1332-21-4   ASBESTOS

PB90-500257
ISCST:  Industrial Source Complex Short Tern.  EPA/ORD (Environmental
Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development) Air Quality
Simulation Modal  (for Microcomputers)
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
J. Mersch
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SH/DK-89-146, CP DOS

Abstract:  Tha software is contained on 5 1/4-inch diskettes, double
density  (360K),  compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer.  The
diskettes are in the ASCII format.  Price includes documentation,
PB88-171475, PB88-171483, and PB88-171491.  The Industrial Source Com-
plex Short-Term modal is a steady-state Gaussian plume model which can
be uaed to assess pollutant concentrations from a vide variety of
sources asaociated with an industrial source complex.  Tha model can
account for settling and dry deposition of particulates, downwash,
area, line and volume aources, plume rise as a function of downward
distance, separation of point sources, and limited terrain adjustment.
Average concentration  or total deposition may be calculated in 1-,
2-, 3-, 4-, 6-,  8-, 12- and/or 24-hour time periods.  An 'N'-day
average concentration (or total deposition) over tha total number of
hours may also be computed.  Software Description:   The model is writ-
ten in the FORTRAN programming language for implementation on an IBM
PC microcomputer.  Data is in compressed format but a dearchive utili-
ty is included.
         DM
         EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  PB90-500265
                                                                                  LONGZ and SHORTZ.   EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of
                                                                                  Research and Development)  Air Quality Simulation Model*
                                                                                  EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ESRL
                                                                                  J.  Merach
                                                                                  Aug 89,  2 diskettes,  EPA-SW/DK-89-164,  CP D03

                                                                                  Abstract:  The model  is contained on 5 1/4-inch,  double density (360K)
                                                                                  diskettes,  compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
                                                                                  ing to an IBM 3090 computer.   Price includes documentation,  PB83-
                                                                                  146092,  PB83-146100,  and PB86-244878.  LONGZ is designed to calculate
                                                                                  the long-term and SHORTZ is designed to calculate the short-term pol-
                                                                                  lutant concentration  produced at  a large number of receptors by emis-
                                                                                  sions from multiple stack, building,  and area sources.   LONGZ usea
                                                                                  statistical wind summaries to calculate long-term (seasonal or annual)
                                                                                  average concentrations.  SHORTZ uses sequential short term (usually
                                                                                  hourly)  meteorological inputs to calculate concentrations for averag-
                                                                                  ing times ranging from 1 hour to 1 year.  The models are applicable in
                                                                                  areaa of both flat and complex terrain, including areas where terrain
                                                                                  elevations exceed stack-top elevations.  The programs require random-
                                                                                  access mass storage capability.  Software Description:   The software
                                                                                  is  written in the FORTRAN programming language for implementation on
                                                                                  an  IBM model 3090 computer.  Tha  model is distributed on a 5 1/4-inch
                                                                                  IBM/PC-compatible diskette.  Data is in compressed format but a dear-
                                                                                  chive utility is included.
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-5Q0315
RAM.  EPA/ORD  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research and
Development) Air Quality Simulation Model
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
J. Mersch
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SH/DK-89-151, CP D01

Abstract:  Tha modal is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density (3fiOK)
diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
ing to an IBM 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation, PB88-
113261.  Gaussian-plume multiple-source air quality algorithm.  RAM, a
short-term Gaussian steady-state algorithm estimates concentrations of
•tabla pollutants frost urban point and srea sources.  Hourly sstaoro
logical* data are used.  Hourly concentrations and averages over a num-
ber of hours can be estimated.  Briggs plume rise is used.  Pasquill-
Gifford dispersion equations with dispersion parameters thought to be
valid for urban areas are used.  Concentrations from area sources are
determined using the method of Hanna, that is, sources directly upwind
are considered representative of area source emission* affecting the
receptor.  Special features include determination of locations of uni-
formly spaced receptors to ensure good area coverage with a minimum
number of receptors.
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
                                                                                     DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
 PB90-50Q323
 CRSTER:  EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
 and Development) Air Quality Simulation Model
 KPA,  Research Triangle Park, HC,  ESRL
 J.  Mersch
 Aug 89, 1 diskette,  EPA-SN/DK-89-152,  CP D01

 Abstract:  The nodel is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
 diskette, compatible irith the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
 ing to an IBM 3090 computer.  Price  includes documentation, PB-271
 360.   The algorithm estimates ground-level concentrations resulting
 from up to 19 colocated elevated stack emissions for an entire year
 and prints out the highest and second highest 1-, 3-, and 24-hour con-
 centrations as well  as the annual mean concentrations at a set of 180
 receptors (5 distances by 36 azimuths).  The algorithm is based on  a
 modified form of the steady-state Gaussian plume equation which uses
 either Pasquill-Cifford or Briggs urban dispersion coefficients and
 includes adjustments for plume rise  and limited mixing.  Terrain ad-
 justments are made as long as the surrounding terrain is physically
 lower than the lowest stack height input.  Pollutant concentrations
 for each averaging time are computed for discrete, non-overlapping
 time  periods (no running averages are computed) using measured hourly
 values of wind speed and direction,  and estimated hourly values of
 atmospheric stability and mixing  height.  Software Description:  The
 model is written in  the FORTRAN programming language for implementa-
 tion  on an IBM 3090  computer.
DM
EPA
DISPERSION MODELING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
w       FB90-500331
         PTPLU.   EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
         and Development)  Air Quality Simulation Model
         EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ESRL
         J.  Mersch
         Aug 89,  1 diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-153, CP D01

         Abstract:   The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360R)
         diskettes,  compatible with the IBM  PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
         ing to an IBM 3090 computer.   Price includes documentation, PB83-
         211235.   PTPLU is a point  source  dispersion Gaussian screening model
         for estimating maximum surface concentrations for 1-hour concentra-
         tions.   PTPLO is  based upon Briggs' plume rise methods and can use
         either Pasquill-Gifford or Briggs'  urban dispersion coefficients.
         PTPLU is an adaption and improvement of PTMAX which allows for wind
         profile  exponents and other optional calculations such as buoyancy in-
         duced dispersion,  stack downwash, and gradual plume rise.  PTPLU pro-
         duces an analysis of concentration  as a function of wind speed and
         stability class for both wind speeds constant with height and wind
         speeds Increasing with height.  Using the extrapolated wind speeds and
         the options allows the model  user a more accurate selection of dis-
         tances to maximum concentration.  PTPLU1 is the interactive version of
         the model.   Software Description:   The model is written in the FORTRAN
         programming language for Implementation on an IBM 3090 computer.  The
         software is distributed on a  5  1/4-inch IBM/PC-compatible diskette.
         Data is  in compressed format  but  a  dearchive utility is included.
                                                              PB90-500349
                                                              VALLEY.   EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Offlee  of Research
                                                              and Development)  Air Quality Simulation Model
                                                              EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ESRL
                                                              J.  Mersch
                                                              Aug 89,  1 diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-163,  CP  D01

                                                              Abstract:   The modal is contained on 5 1/4-inch,  double density  (360K)
                                                              diskettes,  compatible with  the  IBM PC microcomputer,  ready  for upload-
                                                              ing to an IBM 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,  PB-274054.
                                                              The VALLEY algorithm is a steady-state, univariate Gaussian plume  dis-
                                                              persion  algorithm designed  for  estimating either  24-hour  or annual
                                                              concentrations resulting from emissions from up to 50 (total) point
                                                              and area sources.  Calculations of ground-level pollutant concentra-
                                                              tions are made for each frequency designated in an array  defined by
                                                              six stabilities,  16  wind directions,  and  six wind speeds  for 112 pro-
                                                              gram-designed receptor sites  on a radial  grid  of  variable scale.
                                                              Empirical  dispersion coefficients are used and include adjustments for
                                                              plume rise and limited mixing.   Plume height is adjusted  according to
                                                              terrain  elevations and stability classes.  Software  Description:   The
                                                              software is written  in the  FORTRAN programming language for implemen-
                                                              tation on  an  IBM model 3090 computer.  The modal  is  distributed  on a
                                                              5 1/4-inch IBM/PC-compatible  diskette.  Data is in compressed format
                                                              but  a dearchive  utility is  Included.
                                                                          DM
                                                                          EPA
                                                                         DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                          PB90-500372
                                                                          RTDM 3.2:  Rough  Terrain  Diffusion Model.  EPA/ORD  (Environmental
                                                                          Protection Agency/Office  of  Research and Development) Air Quality
                                                                          Simulation Model.
                                                                          EPA,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC,  ESRL
                                                                          J. Mersch
                                                                          Aug  89,  1 diskette, EPA-SN/DK-89-168, CP D01

                                                                          Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
                                                                          diskettes, compatible with the  IBM PC microcomputer, ready  for upload-
                                                                          ing  to an IBM 3090 cooputer.  Price includes documentation, PB88-
                                                                          171467.  The rough terrain diffusion model  (RTDM3.2) is a sequential
                                                                          Gaussian plume model designed to  estimate ground-level concentrations
                                                                          in rough (or flat) terrain in the vicinity of one or more co-located
                                                                          point sources.  It is designed  for applications involving chemically
                                                                          stable atmospheric pollutants and is best suited for elevation of
                                                                          buoyant  plume behavior  within about 15 km from the source (s).  RTDM
                                                                          has  special algorithms  to deal  with plume behavior in complex terrain.
                                                                          Software Description:   The software is written in the FORTRAN program-
                                                                          ming language for Implementation  on an IBM model 3090 computer.  The
                                                                          model is distributed on a 5  1/4-inch IBM/PC-compatible diskette.  Data
                                                                          is in compressed format but  a dearchive utility is Included.
                                                                         DM
                                                                         EPA
                                                                         DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DM
EPA
DISPERSION MODELING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
ro
 i
u>
         PB90-500380
         ISCLT:  Industrial Source Complex Long Term.  EPA/ORD (Environmental
         Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development) Air Quality
         Simulation Model
         EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
         J. Mersch
         Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SW/DK-89-172,  CP D03

         Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch,  double density (360K)
         diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
         ing to an IBM 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation PB88-
         171475, PB88-171483,  and PB88-171491.   The Industrial Source Complex
         Long Term model is a steady-state Gaussian plume model which can be
         used to assess pollutant concentrations from a wide variety of sources
         associated with an industrial source complex.  The model can account
         for settling and dry deposition of particulates,  downwash,  area,  line
         and volume sources, plume rise as a function of downwind distance,
         separation of point sources, and limited terrain adjustment.   ISCLT is
         designed to calculate the average seasonal and/or annual ground level
         concentration or total deposition from multiple continuous  point,
         volume and/or areas sources.  Provision is made for special discrete
         X,  Y receptor points  that may correspond to sampler sites,  points  of
         maxIma, or special points of interest.
         DM
         EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-500398
ISCST:  Industrial Source Complex Short Term.  EPA/ORD (Environmental
Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development) Air Quality
Simulation Model
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
J. Mersch
Aug 89, 1 diskette, KPA-SW/DK-89-173, CP D03

Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density (360K)
diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
ing to an IBM 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,  PB88-
171475, PB88-171483,  and PB88-171491.  The Industrial Source Complex
Short-Term model is a steady-state Gaussian plume model which can be
used to assess pollutant concentrations from a wide variety of sources
associated with an industrial source complex.  The model can account
for .elLIing and dry deposition of particulates, downwash,  area,  line
and volume sources, plume rise as a function of downwind distance,
separation of point sources, and limited terrain adjustment.
        DM
        EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                          PB90-500414
                                                                          COMPLEX1.   EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
                                                                          and Development)  Air Quality Simulation Model
                                                                          EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
                                                                          J.  Mersch
                                                                          Aug 89,  1  diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-176, CP D01

                                                                          Abstract:   The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch,  double density (360K)
                                                                          diskettes,  compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
                                                                          ing to an  IBM 3090 computer.  ASCII format diskettes are available as
                                                                          PB90-500364.   COMPLEXl is a multiple point source code with terrain
                                                                          adjustment.   The  model specifications for testing were suggested by
                                                                          team 'B' on complex terrain at the Regional Workshop on Air Quality
                                                                          Modeling in Chicago,  February 1980.  It is a sequential model utiliz-
                                                                          ing hourly meteorological input.  It assumes a normal distribution in
                                                                          the vertical  and  a uniform distribution across a  22.5 degree sector.
                                                                          The initial screening technique for complex terrain applications,  de-
                                                                          scribed in the Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised),  has been in-
                                                                          corporated as an  option in COMPLEXl.  Software Description:   The soft-
                                                                          ware  is  written in the FORTRAN programming language for implementation
                                                                          on  an IBM model 3090  computer.   The model is distributed on a 5 1/4-
                                                                          inch  IBM/PC-compatible diskette.  Data is in compressed format but a
                                                                          dearchive  utility is  included.
DM
EPA
DISPERSION MODELING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-500752
INPUFF.  EPA/ORD  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
and Development) Air Quality Simulation Model
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
B. Petersen
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SW/DK-89-154, CP D01

Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
ing to an IBM model 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
PB86-242468 and PB86-242450.  INPUFF is primarily designed to model a
single event during which one meteorological transition period may oc-
cur, such as going from afternoon to evening conditions.  Op to 144
separate meteorological periods of the same length may be used to
characterize the meteorology during the event; this provides a time
resolution that ranges from minutes to an hour.  The user has the op-
tion of specifying the wind field for each meteorological period at up
to 100 grid locations or allowing the model to default to a homoge-
neous wind field.   Software Description:   The model is written in the
FORTRAN programming language for implementation on an IBM 3090 com-
puter.
                                                                                 DM
                                                                                 EPA
                                                                                     DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
in
 PB90-500760
 PEM:   Pollution Episodic Model.   EPA/ORO  (Environmental Protection
 Agency/Office  of Research and Development) Air Quality Simulation
 Model
 EPA, Research  Triangle Park,  NC,  ESRL
 B.  Petersen
 Aug 89,  1  diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-155, CP D02

 Abstract:  The modal is contained on 5  1/41-inch, double density  (360K)
 diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
 ing to an  IBM  model  3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
 PB84-232537, PB84-164128,  and PB84-138742.  The Pollution Episodic
 Model  (PEM) is an urban scale (up to 50km distances) air pollution
 model  capable  of predicting short-term  (1 to 24-hour) average surface
 concentrations and deposition fluxes of two gaseous or particulata
 pollutants at  up to  a maximum of  2500 ground-level receptors located
 on  a 50km by 50km square receptor grid.  Predictions are based on
 steady-state Gaussian plume assumptions, Briggs' plume rise formula-
 tions, and Pasquill-Gifford (P-G) dispersion parameters.  The surface
 concentration  and deposition  flux estimates of two independent non-re-
 active (gaseous  or particulate) pollutants or one pollutant with
 first-order chemical decay can be obtained as special cases of the
 model.  Up to  300 point  sources and up  to 50 area sources may be in-
 cluded in the  model  inputs.   Software Description:  The model is writ-
 ten in the FORTRAN programming language for implementation on an IBM
 3090 computer.

 CL-PM       PARTICULATE  MATTER
 DM          DISPERSION MODELING
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 PB90-500794
MESOPUFF.  EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
 and Development)  Air Quality  Simulation Modal
 EPA, Research  Triangle Park,  NC,   ESRL
B. Petersen
Aug 89, 1 diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-158,  CP D01

Abstract:  The model  is  contained on 5  1/4-inch,  double density (360K)
diskettes,  compatible  with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
 ing to an IBM model  3090  computer.  Price includes documentation,
PB84-181775.   The MESO model  is Lagranglan variable-trajectory puff
superposition model  suitable  for modeling the transport,  diffusion,
and removal of air pollutants  from multiple point and area sources at
transport distances beyond the rang* of conventional straight-line
Gaussian plume models  (i.e.; beyond 10-50).   Software Description:
The model is written in the FORTRAN programming language for imple-
mentation on an  IBM  3090  computer.
                                                                                  PB90-500802
                                                                                  PAL:  Point, Area and Line Source Algorithm Model.  EPA/ORD
                                                                                  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development)
                                                                                  Air Quality Simulation Model
                                                                                  EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
                                                                                  B. Petersen
                                                                                  Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SW/DK-89-159, CP D01

                                                                                  Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density (360K)
                                                                                  diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
                                                                                  ing to an IBM model 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
                                                                                  PB87-168787.  The PAL is an acronym for the Point, Area and Line
                                                                                  source algorithm.  PAL is a method of estimating short-term dispersion
                                                                                  using Gaussian-plume steady-state assumptions.  The algorithm can be
                                                                                  used for estimating concentrations of non-reactive pollutants at 99
                                                                                  receptors for averaging times of from 1 to 24 hours, and for a limited
                                                                                  number of point,  area, and line sources (99 of each type).   Calcula-
                                                                                  tions are performed for each hour.  Software Description:  The model
                                                                                  is written in the FORTRAN programming language for implementation on
                                                                                  an IBM 3090 computer.
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-50081Q
HIGHWAY-ROADWAY.  EPA/ORD  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of
Research and Development) Air Quality Simulation Model
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,  ESRL
B. Petersen
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SW/DK-89-160, CP D01

Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
ing to an IBM model 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
PB80-227556.  ROADWAY is a finite-difference model which solves a con-
servation of species equation to  predict pollutant concentrations
within two hundred meters of a highway.  It uses surface layer simi-
larity theory to predict wind and eddy diffusion profiles from temper-
ature at two heights and wind velocity upwind of the highway.  A
unique feature of the model is its use of vehicle wake theory.  It is
assumed that vehicle wakes affect the wind and turbulence fields in a
linear manner with wake intensity a function of vehicle speed, down-
wind distance, and distance from the wake center.  HIWAY is a model
which computes the hourly concentrations of non-reactive pollutants
downwind of roadways.  It is applicable for uniform wind conditions
and level terrain.  Although best suited for at-grade highways, it can
also be applied to depressed highways.
        DM
        EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DM
EPA
DISPERSION MODELING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
ro
 i
u>
a\
         PB90-500828
         UTIL-1.  BPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Research
         and Development) Air Quality Simulation Modal
         EPA, Research Triangla Park, NC, BSRL
         B. Petersen
         Aug 89, 1 diakatta,  EPA-SN/DK-89-161, CP D01

         Abstract:  Tha model ia contained on 5 1/4-inch,  double density (360K)
         diskette*,  compatible with tha IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
         ing to an IBM nodal  3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
         PB84-229467 and PB83-107342.  CAIMPRO, Version 1.0,  is  a postprocessor
         for MPTIR,  CRSTER, or ISC that raada data from an hourly concentration
         fila (output from MPTIR,  CRSTER, or ISC).  RUNAVG,  Version 1.0,  is a
         postprocessor program for determining tha highest and second-highest
         non-overlapping running average.  RUNAVG accepts  hourly concentration
         file input  from either ISCST,  TOPOS,  RAM, MPTER,  or CRSTER.   UTMCON,
         Version 1.0,  is a utility program to convert from latitude and longi-
         tude to OTM coordinates and vice versa.  CHAVG, Version 1.0,  is a
         postprocessor program for computing running averages  (averages that
         begin each  hour and  overlap) and end-to-end averages  (averages that do
         not overlap)  from hourly concentration disk or tape files.
         DM
         KPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-500836
MPTDS Version 1.0.  EPA/ORD  (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of
Research and Development) Air Quality Simulation Model
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
B. Petersen
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SH/DK-89-162, CP D01

Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density (360K)
diskettes, compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer,  ready for upload-
ing to an IBM model 3090 computer.  Price includes documentation,
PB82-215153 and PB83-114207.  MPTDS is a modification of MPTER to ex-
plicitly account for gravitational settling and/or deposition loss of
a pollutant.  Surface deposition fluxes can be printed under an op-
tional output feature.  MPTDS is a multiple point source code with an
optional terrain adjustment feature.  The code is primarily based upon
MPTER which has Gaussian modeling assumptions.  Execution is limited
to a maximum of 250 point sources and 180 receptors.   Hourly meteoro-
logical data are required.  Period of siaulation can  vary iron 1 hour
to 1 year.  Software Statement:  Tha software is written in the
FORTRAN programming language for Implementation on an IBM model 3090
computer.  The model is distributed on a 5 1/4-inch,  IBM/PC-compatible
diskette.
 PB90-500844
 PAL:   Point,  Area and Line Source Algorithm.   EPA/ORD (Environmental
 Protection Agency/Office of Research and Development) Air Quality
 Simulation Modal (for Microcomputers)
 EPA,  Research Triangla Park,  NC,  ESRL
 B.  Patarsen
 Aug 89,  1 diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-89-165, CP D01

 Abstract:  The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch diskettes,  double
 density  (360K),  compatible with tha IBM PC microcomputer.   The disk-
 ettes are in  the ASCII format.  Price Includes documentation,  PB87-
 168787.   PAL  ia a method of estimating short-term dispersion using
 Gaussian-plume steady-state assumptions.   The algorithm can be used
 for estimating concentrations of  non-reactive pollutants at 99 recep-
 tors  for averaging times of from  1 to 24  hours and for a limited num-
 ber of point,  area,  and line sources (99  of each  type).   Calculations
 are performed for each hour.  The hourly  meteorological data required
 are wind direction,  wind spaed, stability class,  and mixing height.
 Single values of each of these  four parameters are assumed representa-
 tive  for the  area modeled.   The PAL model can treat deposition of both
 gaseous  and suspended particulate pollutants  in the plume  since gravi-
 tational settling and dry deposition of tha particles are  explicitly
 accounted for.   Software Description:   The software is written in the
 FORTRAN  programming  language  for  implementation on an IBM-PC micro-
 computer .
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-500869
DATA:  Sample Meteorological Data and Random Numbers Data File
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESRL
B. Petersen
Aug 89, 1 diskette, EPA-DF/DK-89-170, CP D01

Abstract:  The model is contained on 5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
diskettes, compatible with tha IBM PC microcomputer, ready for upload-
ing to an IBM model 3090 computer.  The file CINDAY in unformatted
form has been used for sample meteorological input to a number of dis-
persion models, such as RAM, CRSTER, MPTER, and ISC, for tests using a
year's data.  Since a file in unformatted or binary form cannot readi-
ly be transferred from computer to computer, tha file is furnished in
two parts (ril and PTZ) in ASCII form.   The program ASCBIN converts
the ASCII meteorological data to unformatted (binary form).  The two
parts of the file should be combined together first.
                                                                                  DM
                                                                                  EPA
        DM
        EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                     DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
 PB90-500877
 TUPOS:   EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office of  Research
 and Development)  Air Quality Simulation Model
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ESRL
 B.  Petersen
 Aug 89,  1 diskette,  IPA-SW/DK-89-171,  CP D02

 Abstract:   The model la contained on  5 1/4-inch, double density  (360K)
 diskettes,  compatible with the IBM PC «icroco«put«r, ready  for upload-
 ing to  an IBM model  3090 computer.  Price include* documentation,
 PB86-181310,  PB86-181328,  and PB86-241031.  TOPOS estimates dispersion
 directly from fluctuation atatlstics  at plume level and calculates
 plume rise and partial penetration of the plume into stable layers
 using vertical profiles of wind and temperature.  TOPOS can be used
 for short-term (hours to days)  impact assessment of inert pollutants
 from single or multiple sources and can be expected to have greatest
 accuracy for  locations within 10  km of the source.  Although TUPOS
 will  make  computations for receptors  having any groundlevel elevation,
 it  is not  intended as a complex terrain model, but rather as a model
 for calculations  over flat or gently  rolling terrain.  TUPOS will op-
 tionally treat buoyancy-induced dispersion but does not include build-
 ing downwash,  deposition,  or  fumigation.
DM
EPA
DISPERSION MODELING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-501U5
Surface Impoundment Modeling System  (SIMS), Version 1.0  (for Micro-
computers)
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
D.C. Misenheimer
Sep 89, 1 diskette, EPA-SW/DK-90-009, CP D01

Abstract:  The software is contained on 5 1/4-inch diskettes, double
density (360K), compatible with the IBM PC microcomputer.  The dis-
kettes are in the ASCII format.  Price includes documentation, PB90-
141227 and PB90-141235.  The Surface Impoundment Modeling System
(SIMS) is • personal computer program designed to estimate air emis-
sions from surface impoundments.  The emission estimates are based on
mass transfer models developed by the Emissions Standards Division of
the Environmental Protection Agency during the evaluation of hazardous
waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.  SIMS allows the
user to specify all the required inputs to these emission models when
the information is available, or when only limited information is
available, provides default values for most of the modal inputs.
Software Description:  The software is written in the C programming
language for implementation on an IBM PC or compatible.
IF
EPA
EMISSION FACTOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 PB90-502253
 DEGADIS  (DEnse  GAs Dispersion)  Model,  Version  2.1  (for Microcomputers)
 EPA,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 D.  Guinnup
 1989,  1  diskette,  EPA-SW/DK-90-034,  CP D01

 Abstract:  Supersedes PB88-202379.   Computer:  DEC VAX.  Language:
 FORTRAN.  The program is  written  in  FORTRAN for  compilation and exe-
 cution on a DEC VAX computer.   Implementation  on any other system may
 be  attempted at the risk  of the user.   To facilitate dissemination of
 the model, it is being  provided on diskette.   The software is con-
 tained on one 360K, 5 1/4-inch  diskette, double  density.  File format:
 Executable code only.   The diskettes are in the  ASCII format.  Price
 includes documentation, PB90-213893.   An improved Jet-Plume model has
 been  interfaced with DEGADIS  to provide for prediction of the trajec-
 tory  and dilution  of elevated dense  gas jets to  ground contact.
 DEGADIS  predicts the ensuing  ground-level plume  dispersion.  The Jet-
 Plume model provides for:  automatic adjustment  of integration step-
 size  (using the Rnnge-Kutta-Cill  method as  in  DEGADIS):  elliptical
 plume shape (cross-section),  with the  Paaquill-Gifford plume disper-
 sion  coefficient representation of atmospheric turbulent entrainment;
 user  specification of averaging time;  ground reflection when the plume
 (lower) boundary reaches  ground level;  and  application to scenarios
 where the plume remains aloft.  The  model should be uploaded via modem
 from  a PC terminal to host a  VAX  computer,  and several files must then
 be  renamed prior to compilation and  execution.
                                                             DM
                                                             EPA
            DISPERSION MODELING
            ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PB90-504119
Complex Terrain Dispersion Model Plus  (CTDMPLUS)  (for Microcomputers)
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, AREAL
Jun 90, 1 diskette, EPA-SN/DK-90-164, CP DOS

Abstract:  System:  IBM PC or compatible; MS DOS operating system.
Language:  FORTRAN77 and Pascal.  Attempts to run the modeling system
without a math co-processor will cause a runtime error number of 4001.
Supersedes PB88-161682 and PB88-162169.  The software is contained on
one 1.2M, 5 1/4 inch diskette, high density.  File format:  ASCII.
Price includes documentation, PB90-243809.  The Complex Terrain Dis-
persion Model Plus (CTDMPLUS) is a refined air quality model for use
in all stability conditions for complex terrain applications.  It con-
tains the technology of the original Complex Terrain Dispersion Model
(CTDH) for stable and neutral conditions, but also models daytime, un-
stable conditions.  The model makes use of considerable detail in the
terrain and meteorological data (as compared to current EPA regulatory
models) and requires the parameterization of individual terrain fea-
tures, thus considering the three-dimensional nature of the interac-
tion of the plume and terrain.
                                                                         DM
                                                                         KPA
                                                                         DISPERSION MODELING
                                                                         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
ro
 i
u>
CO
 PB91-102111
 Control  of VOC Emissions tram Polystyrene  Foam Manufacturing
 KPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  OAQPS
 Radian Corporation
 C.J.  Bagley,  J.S.  McLean,  and M.B.  Stockton
 Sep 90,  112p,  EPA-450/3-90-020,  PC  A06/MF  A01

 Abstract:  The document contains information on polystyrene foam manu-
 facturing  processes,  associated  •Missions  of VOCs, emission control
 Mthods, and  cost  estimates  for  (mission control.

 CL-VOC      VOLATILE  ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
 CT          CNTRL  TECHNOLOGY  DOC
 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 SA          SOURCE ASSESSMENT
 100-42-5    STYRENE
 30          ROBBER AND MISC.  PLASTICS PRODUCTS
 308         MISCELLANEOUS  PLASTICS  PRODUCTS, NEC
 3086        PLASTICS  FOAM  PRODUCTS

 PB91-103556
 Technical  Support  Document on Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures
 EPA, Cincinnati, OH,  ECAO
 Syracuse Research  Corporation
 Nov 88,  186p,  EPA-600/8-90-064, PC A09/MF A01

 Abstract:  Th« document was recommended by the U.S. EPA'* Science Ad-
 visory Board as a  means of providing the broad technical background
 for the principles and procedures described in the 'Guidelines for
 Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures'.  Unique sections include
 an overview of available tozlcity data on complex mixtures and binary
 exposures,  an  estimate of the maximum synergistic effect observed for
 environmental  chemicals, an evaluation of quantitative methods (sta-
 tistics and models) that have been used in characterizing Interaction
 data base,  and recommendations for Guidelines revisions and future re-
 search relevant to risk assessment.   The two most significant  conclu-
 sions in the document are  (1) that the available literature is ex-
tremely poor for use in quantifying the extent  of synergism expected
 from environmental exposures, and (2)  that validation of in vitro and
short-term in vivo studies seems to be the most  promising approach for
assessment  of complex mixtures.
        EPA
        RA
            ENVlROWfiMTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            RISK ASSESSMENT
                                                                                  PB91-110023
                                                                                  Guides to Pollution Prevention:
                                                                                  EPA, Cincinnati, OH, RREL
                                                                                  Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
                                                                                  L.M. Brown
                                                                                  Aug 90, 53p, EPA-625/7-90-008, PC A04/MF A01
                                  The Commercial Printing Industry
                                                                                  Abstract:  Commercial printers, who Include lithographers, gravure
                                                                                  printers, flexographers, and letterpress and screen printers, generate
                                                                                  a variety of wastes during printing operations.  The manual largely
                                                                                  addresses the wastes and waste minimization options for offset litho-
                                                                                  graphers.  Naste that can be disposed of in trash include some waste
                                                                                  P«P«r; film; empty containers; used blankets; and damaged products and
                                                                                  other items.  The wastes result from image processing, plate making,
                                                                                  proof making, printing, and finishing processes.  Another form of
                                                                                  waste - wastewater - results from image processing,  plate making, and
                                                                                  printing processes.  Equipment cleaning wastes and air emissions are
                                                                                  other categories of waste.  Much of the waste paper generated can be
                                                                                  recycled.
                                                                                  EPA
                                                                                  PP
                                                                                  27
             ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             POLLUTION PREVENTION
             PRINTING AND PUBLISHING
 PB91-116269
 Exploratory Assessment  of  the  Risk of Lung Cancer Associated with Ex-
 posure  to Diesel  Exhaust Based on  a Study in Rats.  Exploratory  Diesel
 Risk Assessment
 NIOSR
 Aug 90,  66p,  PC A04/MF  A04

 Abstract:   A request was made  by the Mine Safety and Health Adminis-
 tration to assess quantitatively the risk of lung cancer among those
 occupationally exposed  to  diesel exhaust.  The Armitage-Doll multi-
 stage model was adapted to fit both the cases of all tumors and
 malignant  neoplasms alone.  A  number of assumptions were made to ex-
 tend the risk estimates derived from the models of tumor response in
 rats to the risks for humans.  These assumptions fell into three
 categories:   those concerning the  development of biologically equiva-
 lent doses for rats and humans, those relating external exposure to
 internal dose, and those concerning the scaling of age between rats
 and humans to account for  the temporal aspects of exposure.  Uncer-
 tainties in the study included the  effects of exposure on lung
 clearance  mechanisms, the  deposition rates in humans,  and the rele-
 vance of the  exposure index limit.   Based on the findings of the study
 the excess risk to miners  of lung cancer at the upper range of the
 diesel particulate exposure reported, 1.5mg/cu m,  was approximately
 1.5 to 3 in 100.  According to the authors,  the results are consistent
with previous recommendations by NIOSH that diesel exhaust should be
regarded as a potential human carcinogen,  and that efforts should be
made to  reduce exposures to the lowest feasible concentration.

CL-DIESEL   DIESEL FUEL EMISSIONS
NIOSH       NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUP.  SAFETY AND HEALTH
RA          RISK ASSESSMENT
10          METAL MINING
12          COAL MINING
13          OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION
14          NONMETALLIC MINERALS,  EXCEPT FUELS

-------
ro
PB91-125831
Testing of Indoor Radon Reduction Technique* in Basement Rouses Hairing
Adjoining King*
BPA, Research Triangle Park, DC, AEERL
Infiltec
M. Messing
Nov 90, 212p, EPA-fiOO/8-90-076, PC A10/MF A02

Abstract:  The report give* results of tests of indoor radon reduction
technique* in 12 existing Maryland houses,  with the objective of de-
termining vhen basement houses with adjoining wings require active
soil depreasurization (ASD) treatment of both wings,  and when treat-
ment of the baaeawnt alone is sufficient.   In five basement houses
with adjoining slab* on grade, ASD treatment of both wings provided an
incremental additional radon reduction of 0 to 5.2 pCi/I,  compared to
ASD treatment of either on* of the slabs alone.   However,  basement-on-
ly treatment reduced radon to < 4 pCi/L in all five houses.  In six
basement houses having adjoining crawl spaces,  ASD treatment of both
wings  (including sub-liner depressurization of the crawl space)  pro-
vided little additional reduction compared to basement-only treatment,
when sub-slab communication was good.  When communication was not
good,  treatment of both wings was required to achieve < 4 pCi/L.
Tests of one fully slab-on-grade house showed that,  when there is good
aggregate under the slab,  a one-pipe sub-slab depressurization system
can achieve < 1-2 pCi/L,  even when there are forced-air supply ducts
under the slab.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IA          INDOOR AIR
10043-92-2  RADON
PB91-1260Q3
Toxic Air Pollutant Emission Factors - A Compilation for Selected Air
Toxic Compounds and Sources, Second Edition
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Radian Corporation
A.A. Pope, et al.
Oct 90, 814p, EPA-450/2-90-011, PC A99/MT A99

Abstract:  The report presents the second edition of the Toxic Air
Pollutant Emission Factor Compilation that contains emission factors
for selected air toxic compounds and sources, and associates the fac-
tors to levels of source activity.  The emission factors, compiled
from a review df the literature, are sorted by pollutant and source.
Each factor is identified by pollutant name, CAS number, process and
•mission source descriptions, SIC Code and SCC 's.  The second edition
revises and expands the report, Toxic Air Pollutant Emission Factors -
A Compilation For Selected Air Toxic Compounds and Sources, Second
Edition, PB89-135644.  A software system, XATEF, containing the fac-
tors, haa been developed for easy access and updating of the data.
Use of the system is explained in the EPA report, Crosswalk/Air Toxic
Emission Factor Data Base Management System User's Manual.  EPA is
making available the system and data base records to agency users upon
request.  The purpose of the report is to offer a technical service to
air pollution control agencies in performing preliminary estimates of
air toxics emissions.  The emission factors are not intended to pro-
vide exact estimates of releases of air toxics from specific facili-
ties.

CL-HAPS     TITLE III HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
CL-METAL    METALLIC COMPOUNDS
CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EF          EMISSION FACTOR
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  PB91-127233
                                                                                  National Emission Standards for  Asbestos.
                                                                                  Promulgated Asbestos  NESHAP Revisions
                                                                                  EPA,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC,  OAQPS
                                                                                  Oct  90,  260p,  EPA-450/3-90-017,  PC A12/MF  A02
                                                                                                                    Background Information for
                                                                                 Abstract:   Revisions  to the  national  emission standards to  control
                                                                                 emissions of  asbestos from asbestos milling,  manufacturing,  and fabri-
                                                                                 cating plants;  demolitions and renovations; and asbestos waste dispos-
                                                                                 al  are being  promulgated under Section  112 of the  Clean Air Act.   The
                                                                                 document contains  summaries  of public comments,  EPA responses,  and a
                                                                                 summary of  changes since proposal.

                                                                                 EPA        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
                                                                                 NESHAP     NATL EMIS STD RAZ  AP
                                                                                 1332-21-4   ASBESTOS
                                                                                 26          PAPER  AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
                                                                                 262        PAPER  MILLS
                                                                                 2621        PAPER  MILLS
                                                                                 30          RUBBER AND MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS
                                                                                 305        HOSE i BELTING I GASKETS  C  PACKING
                                                                                 3053        GASKETS,  PACKING AND  SEALING DEVICES
                                                                                 32          STONE,  CLAY,  AND GLASS PRODUCTS
                                                                                 329        MISC.  NONMETALLIC  MINERAL PRODUCTS
                                                                                 3292        ASBESTOS  PRODUCTS

-------
IO
 I
PB91-136523
Noncarcinogenic Iff act • of Chromium:  Update to Health Assessment
Document
KPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ECAO
N. Victery, et al.
Apr 90, 104p, IPA-600/8-87-048F, PC A06/MT A01

Abitract:  The document update* the 1984 Health A*****ment Document
for Chromium by addre**ing i**ue* regarding noncarcinogenic health ef-
fect* of chromium; oxidation *tate* and per*i*t«nce of the*e state* in
the environment; campling and analytical methodology to differentiate
theae oxidation *tate* and amount* at •ubmicrogram ambient air level*;
the degree of human expo*ure to chromium in the environment, both
•hort-term and long-term; in vivo reduction of Cr (VI)  to Cr (III);
and effect* from environmentally relevant level* on pulmonary function
and renal function.  Trlvalent chromium i* chemically stable; Cr (VI)
i* readily reduced to Cr (III).  Oxidation *tate of chromium in am-
bient air depend* on proximity to sources emitting one form over the
other.   Reliable monitoring method* to speclate oxidation states at
ambient air level* below 1 mlcrogram/cu m are not available.  Ambient
level* of total chromium (obtained from EPA'* National Air Data
Branch) range from a high of 0.6 microgram/cu m to below the detection
limit of 0.005 microgram/cu m.  Reduction of hexavalent chromium in
vivo occur* in several organ systems and therefore,  email amount* of
inhaled Cr (VI)  will be reduced before •y*temlc absorption can occur.
Trivalent chromium 1* an essential trace metal which potentiates ac-
tion* of insulin-mediated glucose transport.

CL-CHROME   CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
HA          HEALTH ASSESSMENT
16065-83-1  CHROMIUM ION
18540-29-9  CHROMIUM (VI)  COMPOUNDS
7440-47-3   CHROMIUM
 PB91-137273
 Indoor Air - Assessment:  Method* of Analysis for Environmental
 Carcinogen*
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, ECAO
 M.R.  Peterson,  D.F.  Naugla, and M.A. Berry
 Jun 90,  49p, EPA-600/8-90-041, PC A03/MF A01

 Abstract:   The monograph describes,  in a general way,  published sam-
 pling procedure* and analytical approaches for known and suspected
 carcinogen*.  The primary focus 1* upon carcinogen* found in indoor
 air,  although the method* described are applicable to other media or
 environment*.   In cases where there are no published method* for a
 particular pollutant in indoor air,  method* developed for the work-
 place and for ambient air are Included since they should be adaptable
 to indoor air.   Known and suspected carcinogen* have been grouped into
 •ix categoric*  for the purposes of thi* and related work.   The cate-
 gories are radon,  asbestos,  organic compounds,  inorganic species,
 particle*,  and non-ionizing radiation.   Some method* of assessing ex-
 posure that are not  specific to any particular pollutant category are
 covered in a separate section.  The report i* the fifth in a aeries of
 EPA/Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office Monograph*.

 CL-INORGAN  INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 CL-ORGANIC  ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
 CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
 CL-RAD      RADIATION
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 IA          INDOOR AIR
 10043-92-2   RADON
 1332-21-4    ASBESTOS
                                                                                                            A Model for Screening Toxic Air Pollutant
PB91-141820
User'* Guide to TSCREEN
Concent ration*
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC,  OAQPS
Pacific Environmental Service*
K. Stroupe, S. Boone, and C. Thames
Dec 90, 37p, EPA-450/4-90-013,  PC A03/MF A01

Abstract:  The user'* guide describes how to start, enter/edit, use
the help system, back up data and compile the TSCREEN model.  TSCREEN
i* a model for estimating ambient pollutant concentration* for a vari-
ety of release scenario* from Superfund sites and other sources of air
toxics releases.  The computer  program implement* the procedure* de-
veloped in a document entitled  'A Workbook of Screening Technique* for
Assessing Impact* of Toxic Air  Pollutant*,' PB89-134340 and should be
used in conjunction with the workbook.  TSCREEN ha* a front-end con-
trol program that also provide*, by use of interactive menu* and data
entry screens, the same step* a* the workbook.  An extensive help sy-
stem 1* provided to guide the user.  Text edit and graphical display
capabilities are also provided.

CL-HAZWAST  HAZARDOUS WASTES
DM          DISPERSION MODELING
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
PB91-14B262
Urban Air Toxic* Monitoring Program, 1989
IPA, Research Triangle  Park, HC, OAQPS
Radian Corp.
R.A. McAllister at al.
Oct 90, 278p, EPA-450/4-91-001, PC A13/MT A02

Abstract:  From January 1989 through January 1990 samples of ambient
air were collected at 14 aitaa in the eastern part of th« O.S.  Every
12 day*, air wa* integrated orar 24-hour periods into pasaivated
stainless steel canlatar*.   Simultaneously, air wa* drawn through car-
tridge* containing dinltrophenylhydrazine to collect carbonyl
compounds.  The sample* war* analyzed at a central laboratory for a
total of 37 halogenated and aromatic hydrocarbon*, formaldehyde, acet-
aldahyda, and other oxygenated species.  The hydrocarbon species were
analyzed by gaa chromatography/multiple detector* and gas chronatogra-
phy/mass spectrometry,  while the carbonyl species were analyzed by
liquid chrcsutography.   An  extensive quality assurance program wa*
carried on to secure high quality data.  Complete data for all the
carbonyl samples are presented in the report.

AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
CL-ALDEHYD  ALDEHYDES
CL-AROMHC   AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
CL-HALOGHC  HALOGENATED HYDROCARBONS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE
75-07-0     ACETALDEHYDE
PB91-148288
Urban Air Toxica Monitoring Program Aldehyde Results, 1989
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Radian Corp.
R.A. McAllister, D.L. Epper*on, R.r. Jongleux
Jan 91, 149p, EPA-450/4-91-006, PC  A07/MF A01

Abstract:  The D.S. EPA developed the Urban Air Toxic* Monitoring Pro-
gram (UATMP) to help State and local agencies assess the nature and
magnitude of their air toxic* problems.  The OATMP sampler collect*
ambient air samples at urban sites  in <-liter (L) SUMMA-treated «tain-
las* steel canisters.  At the same  time, through a separate heated
•ample line, ambient air samples are drawn in parallel through dupli-
cate cartridges which trap the carbonyl compound* from the ambient
air.  The aldehyde cartridges collected at the UATMP sites for 1989
were extracted and analyzed by the  Atmospheric Research and Exposure
Laboratory  (AREAL) of the U.S. EPA  at Research Triangle Park, NC, for
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone.  These carbonyl* were se-
lected as target compound* for the  1989 UATMP.  The report presents
the data summaries and other data assessments for the carbonyl samples
collected during the 1989 UATMP season.  The air toxic* compound*
collected in canisters for the 1989 UATMP season are reported sepa-
rately .

AM          AMBIENT MONITORING
CL-ALDEHYD  ALDEHYDES
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RDG         REG DEVELOPMNT GUIDE
50-00-0     FORMALDEHYDE
67-64-1     ACETONE
75-07-0     ACETALDEHYDE

-------
         PB91-162560
         Bioassay of Complex Mixture* of Indoor Air Pollutant!.
         EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, HERL
         J.  Lewtas,  et «1.
         1990, 21p,  EPA-600/D-90-242, PC A03/MT A01
                                                        Chapter  7
ro
*»
to
Abstract:   There  are  several  strategies  for conducting bioassay  stud-
ies of indoor air pollutant mixtures.  One approach i« to generate in-
door pollutant! from  sources  under laboratory conditions suitable for
human, animal, or in  vitro bioassay studies.  This approach was  used
extensively to evaluate tobacco saoke and to a lesser extent for other
indoor combustion sources  such as  kerosene heaters.  A second approach
is to simulate these  complex  mixtures by simpler mixtures of pure
chemicals which can be  used in biological studies.  The third ap-
proach, which is  described in more detail here, is to use bioassays in
the direct  evaluation of complex mixtures of indoor air pollutants.
The mixtures of organics found indoors frost combustion sources,  build-
ing materials, household products  and human activities are extremely
complex.  They consist  of  thousands of components which are not  well
characterized or  quantified.   Many of these mixtures and certain com-
ponents are potential human carcinogens.  The development of short-
term bioassays to detect mutagens  and potential carcinogens has  facil-
itated studies of complex  mixtures including air pollutants and  can-
bust ion emissions.  Chapter 7 will focus on the development and  appli-
cation of bacterial mutagenicity assays  to complex mixtures of indoor
air pollutants.

CL-CARCIN    CARCINOGENS
EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
IA           INDOOR AIR
RA           RISK  ASSESSMENT

PB91-168534
Municipal Waste Combustion:   Background  Information for Promulgated
Standards and Guidelines.  Summary of Public Comments and Responses
EPA, Research Triangle  Park,  NC, OAQPS
Radian Corporation
Dec 90, 520p,  EPA-450/3-91-004,  PC A22/MF A03

Abstract:   EPA is preparing for promulgation under Clean Air Act
111(b) emission standards  for new  MHC '• and,  under lll(d),  emission
guidelines  for existing MHC's.   The standards and guidelines will ap-
ply to MHC  units  with a capacity to combust 250 or more tons nf munic-
ipal solid  waste  per  day.  The standards and guidelines were proposed
in the Federal Register on December 20,  1989 (54 FR 52251 and 54 FR
52209).  Public hearings were held in January 1990 in Boston,  MA, De-
troit, ME,   and Seattle,   HA.   These meetings were open to the public
and the public was ilven an opportunity to comment on the proposal.
Additionally, EPA zeceived over  300 written comment letters.   The re-
port summarizes all comments  and presents the Agency's responses.

EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS         NEW SRC PRFHMNCE  STD
11104-93-1   NITROGEN  OXIDES
49           ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495          SANITARY  SERVICES
4953         REFUSE SYSTEMS
7446-09-5    SULFUR DIOXIDE
PB91-168542
Municipal Naste Combustion:  Background Information for Promulgated
Standards and Guideline*.  Summary of Public Comments and Responses.
Appendices A to C
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, OAQPS
Radian Corporation
Dec 90, 105p, EPA-450/3-91-004A, PC A06/MF A01

Abstract:  Appendices A to C to the 'Municipal Haste Combustion:
Background Information for Promulgated Standards and Guidelines - Sum-
mary of Public Comments and Responses' (PB91-168534),  address key
technical issues related to the promulgated rules for municipal waste
combustors (MHC's).  Appendix A provides analysis of the continuous
S02 control capabilities of spray dryer/fabric filter (SD/FF) and
spray dryer/electrostatic precipitator (SD/ESP) control systems for
MHC's.  Achievable S02 performance levels for these systems are deter-
mined based on the analysis.  Similarly,  Appendix B provides analysis
of continuous NOX emissions data from MHC's.  Results are presented
for the statistical analysis of NOX data obtained from a grate-fired
mass burn waterwall MHC using selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR)
to reduce NOX emissions and from a rotary mass burn waterwall MHC de-
signed to limit NOX emissions through combustion control.   Appendix C
provides additional MHC emissions test data which became available
following proposal of the standards and guidelines for MHC's on Decem-
ber 20, 1989.  The appendix reviews data at four MHC's with either u-
nique air pollution control technologies or emissions  which are higher
than for similarly controlled MHC's that had been previously examined.

CT          CNTRL TECHNOLOGY DOC
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEN SRC PRFRMNCE STD
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE

-------
ro
 i
*»
w
PB91-168575
Air Pollutant Emission Standard* and Guidelines for Municipal Waste
Combustors:  Revision and Update of Econcnic Impact Analysis and
Regulatory Impact Analysis
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, QAQPS
Research Triangle Init.
G.E. Morris, B.L. Jellloorse, and R. Sarmiento
Hov 90, 115p, EPA-450/3-91-003, PC A06/MF A01

Abstract:  EPA is preparing for promulgation under Clean Air Act
111 (b) emission standards for new Municipal Waste Combustors (MffCs)
and, under lll(d), emission guidelines for existing MWCs.  The stan-
dards and guidelines will apply to MWCs with a capacity to combust 35
or more Mg of municipal solid waste per day.  The report updates
'Economic Impact of Air Pollutant Emission Standards for New Municipal
Waste Combustors,' EPA-450/3-89-006 (August 1989), 'Economic Impact of
Air Pollutant Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal Waste Com-
bustors,' EPA-4SO/3-89-005 (August 1989),  and 'Regulatory Impact
Analysis of Air Pollutant Emission Standards and Guidelines for Munic-
ipal Haste Combustors,' (PB90-154915,  October 1989).   The update de-
scribes baseline projections of MfCs,  economic analysis methodology
national costs and emission reductions attributable to the standards
and guidelines,  the sensitivity of costs to assumptions about capacity
utilization and about materials separation requirements, and how the
standards and guidelines may change communities'  choices of waste dis-
posal technology.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFFMTCE STD
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE
55 FR 08292 03-07-90
National  Emissions Standards  for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Benzene
Emissions from Chemical Manufacturing Process  Vents,  Industrial
Solvent Use, Benzene Waste Operations,  Benzene Transfer Operations,
and Gasoline Marketing System
EPA, Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ESD

Abstract:  Final rule.  This  action promulgates the  standards  for ben-
zene waste operations and benzene transfer operations that were pro-
posed at  54 FR 38083, 9-14-B9.   These standards implement Section 112
of the Clean Air Act and are  based on the Administrator's determina-
tion that  benzene emissions from these source  categories present a
significant risk to human health.  The intended effect  of the  stan-
dards is  to require all existing, new,  modified, or  reconstructed
sources to reduce emissions to a level which provides an ample margin
of safety to protect public health.   For reasons stated in Section IV
of Supplementary Information  of  this  rule, the Administrator is with-
drawing the standards proposed for the industrial solvent use  and gas-
oline marketing source categories.  This action also serves as notice
of the Administrator's final  determination not to regulate the chemi-
cal manufacturing process vent source category.  Corrections were made
at 55 FR  12444, 4-3-90; 55 FR 18330,  5-2-90; and 55  FR  37230,  9-10-90.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NESHAP      NATL EMS STD HAZ AP
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED  PRODUCTS
286         INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS
2865        CYCLIC CRUDES AMD INTERMEDIATES
29          PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
291         PETROLEUM REFINING
2911        PETROLEUM REFINING
33          PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
331         BLAST FURNACE AND BASIC STEEL PRODUCTS
3312        BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL  MILLS
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
51          WHOLESALE TRADE-NONDURABLE GOODS
517         PETROLEUM AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
5171        PETROLEUM BULK STATIONS t TERMINALS
5172        PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,  NEC
71-43-2     BENZENE
8006-61-9   GASOLINE

-------
K)
 I
55 fR 11338 03-27-90
Review of Standard* of Performance for New Stationary Source*;
Phoaphata Rock Planta
EPA, Raaaarch Triangle Park, NC, ISB/1SD

Abstract:  Raviaw of atandarda.  Tha EPA la required by tha Clean Air
Act to review atandarda of performance for new, modified, or recon-
structed stationary aourcaa every four years.  The first review of tha
existing naw source performance atandarda (NSPS) for phosphate rock
plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart NN) has bean completed to determine
tha need for revision of tha existing atandarda.  Tha EPA has con-
cluded that no revision to the atandarda is appropriate at this time.

CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFPMNCE STD
14          NONMKTALLIC MINERALS, EXCEPT FUELS
147         CHEMICAL AND FERTILIZER MINERALS
1475        PHOSPHATE ROCK
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
287         AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
2874        PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZERS

55 FR 13480 04-10-90
NESHAPS for Radionuclidea Reconsideration; Phosphogypsum
EPA, Washington, DC, ORP

Abstract:  Notice of limited reconsideration of final rule and deter-
mination of compliance waiver.  This action announces the limited re-
consideration by EPA of the portion of 40 CFR part 61,  subpart R,  Na-
tinonal Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants,  Radon Emis-
sions from Phosphogypsum Stack* (54 FR 51654 12-15-89)  that requires
disposal of phosphogypsum in stacks or mines, thereby precluding al-
ternative uaea of the material.  In light of this reconsideration and
other factors described herein, EPA is alao granting a limited com-
pliance waiver that permits the continued agricultural use of phospho-
gypsum through the current growing aeaaon.  EPA it establishing a 60-
day comment period to receive information relating to the limited re-
consideration.  In the same issue of the Federal Regiater,  EPA i> alao
noticing several proposed alternatives that  address the subject mat-
ter of thla limited reconsideration.   (See the proposed rule printed
elaewhere in the issue.)  A public hearing on th««» issue* ••*• held.

CL-PROSPHA  PHOSPHATES
CL-RAD      RADIATION
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NESHAP      NATL EMIS STD HAZ AP
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
287         AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
2874        PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZERS
 55  FR 13482  04-10-90
 NESHAPS  for  Radionuclidea  Reconsideration
 EPA,  Washington,  DC,  ORP

 Abstract:  Notice of proposed rule.   This action  announces the limited
 reconsideration by EPA  of  the portion of  40  CFR part  61,  subpart  R,
 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air  Pollutants, Radon Emis-
 sions from Phoaphogypaum Stacks (54  FR 51654 12-15-89)  that  requires
 disposal of  phoaphogypsum  in stacks  or mines,  thereby precluding  al-
 ternative uaes of the material.   In  light of this reconaideration and
 other factora described herein,  in a document  published at 55  FR  13480
 (4-10-90), EPA is also  granting a limited compliance  waiver  that  per-
 mits  the continued agricultural uae  of phosphogypsum  through the  cur-
 rent  growing season.  This action further notices four  alternatives
 for rulemaking by which EPA is proposing  to  maintain  or modify the
 rule.

 CL-PHOSPHA   PHOSPHATES
 CL-RAD      RADIATION
 EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
 FR           FED REGISTER NOTICES
 NESHAP      NATL  EMIS STD  HAZ AP
 28           CHEMICALS AND  ALLIED PRODUCTS
 287          AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
 2874         PHOSPHATIC  FERTILIZERS

 55 FR 26912  06-29-90
 Standards of Performance for New Stationary  Sources; Volatile  Organic
 Compound (VOC) Emissions From the Synthetic  Organic Chemical
 Manufacturing Industry  (SOCMI) Air Oxidation Processes
 EPA,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC,  ESD

 Abstract:  Final  rule.   Standards of performance  for air oxidation
 unit  proceaaea in the SOCMI  were proposed in the  Federal Register on
 October  21,  1983  (48  FR 48932).   On  May 16,  1985,  the public comment
 period waa reopened (50  FR 20446) for the  purpose of allowing  public
 comment  on the results  of  a  reanalyaia of  the coating procedures,  the
 total  resource effectiveness (TRE) equation  and coefficlenta,  and the
 designation  of affected  facility.  This action promulgates standards
 of performance for  SOCMI air oxidation unit  processes.  These  stan-
 dards  implement Section  111  of the Clean Air Act  (CAA) and are baaed
 on the Administrator's determination that VOC emissions from air oxi-
 dation processes  in tfcs  SOCMI causa  or cootribute significantly to air
 pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
 health or welfare.  The  intended effect of these atandarda ia to re-
 quire  all new,  modified, and reconstructed air oxidation facilitiea to
 achieve  an emission reduction that reflects the capabilities of the
best demonstrated system of continuous emission reduction, consider-
 ing costs,  nonair quality health, and environmental and energy Im-
pacts.  Corrections made at 55 FR 36932 9-7-90.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE STD
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS

-------
ro
i
 55 FR 26931 06-29-90
 Standards of Performance for Mew Stationary  Sources; Volatile Organic
 Compound (VOC)  Baissiona From the Synthetic  Organic Chemical  Manu-
 facturing Industry (SOCMI)  Distillation  Operations
 CPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  ISO

 Abstract:   Final rule.   Standards of performance for distillation  unit
 operations in the SOCMI were proposed  in the Federal Register on De-
 cember 30,  1983 (48 FR 57538).   On May 16, 1985, the public comment
 period was reopened (50 FR  20446)  for  the purpose of allowing public
 comment on revisions to the affected facility designation and the
 costing procedures.   This action promulgates standards of performance
 for SOCMI  distillation unit operations.  These standards implement
 Section 111 of  the Clean Air Act  (CAA) and are based on the Adminis-
 trator' s determination that VOC  emissions from SOCMI cause or contrib-
 ute significantly to air pollution which Bay reasonably be anticipated
 to endanger public health or welfare.  The intended effect of these
 standards  is to require all new,  modified, and reconstructed  distil-
 lation facilities to achieve an  emission reduction that reflects the
 capabilities of the best demonstrated  system of continuous emission
 reduction,  considering costs,  nonair quality health, and environmental
 and energy impacts.   Corrections  made  at 55  FR 36932 9-7-90.

 CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
 NSPS         NEW SRC  PRFEMNCE  STD
 28           CHEMICALS AN) ALLIED  PRODUCTS

 55  FR 26953 06-29-90
 Standards  of Performance for  New  Stationary  Sources; Volatile  Organic
 Compound (VOC)  Emissions From the  Synthetic Organic Chemical
 Manufacturing Industry  (SOCMI) Reactor Processes
 EPA, Research Triangle  Park,  NC, ESD

 Abstract:   Proposed  rule and  notice of public hearing.   The proposed
 standards would limit the emissions of VOC from new, modified, and
 reconstructed SOCMI  reactor process facilities.   The proposed  stan-
 dards  implement  Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)  and are based
 on  the Administrator's  determination that emissions from the SOCMI
 cause  or contribute  significantly to air pollution which may reasona-
 bly be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.   The  intent
 is  to  require new, modified,  and reconstructed SOCMI reactor process
 facilities to control emissions to the level achievable by the best
 demonstrated system  of  continuous emission reduction,  considering
 costs, nonair quality health  and environmental impacts,  and energy
 requirements.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS        HEN SRC PRFRMNCE STD
 28          CHEMICALS AM) ALLIED PRODUCTS
                                                                                  55 FR 28346 07-10-90
                                                                                  National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Revisions to
                                                                                  Vinyl Chloride; Equipment Leaks of Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants
                                                                                  EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ESD

                                                                                  Abstract:  Final rule.  On September 21, 1989 (54 FR 38938), EPA pro-
                                                                                  posed minor revisions to national emission standards for vinyl chlo-
                                                                                  ride (VC) and equipment leaks of volatile hazardous air pollutants.
                                                                                  The revisions to the national emission standards for hazardous air
                                                                                  pollutants (NESHAP)  were proposed as a result of petitions for recon-
                                                                                  sideration and review filed by the Society of the Plastics Industry,
                                                                                  Inc.,  Dow Chemical Company,  Georgia Gulf Corporation, and Vista Chem-
                                                                                  ical Company.  This action promulgates final revisions to the NESHAP.
                                                                                  The intended effect of this action is to grant the petitioners' re-
                                                                                  quest for clarification of ambiguities in several definitions and in
                                                                                  the applicability of certain regulatory requirements in the standards.
                                                                                  This notice is not intended to address the July 28, 1987, decision by
                                                                                  the D.C. Circuit Court on the VC standards,  Natural Resources Defense
                                                                                  Council, Inc. v. EPA,  824 F.2d 1146 (1987).   Any response to that de-
                                                                                  cision will be made in a future notice in the Federal Register.

                                                                                  EPA         ENVIROWaNTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                                                  FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
                                                                                  NESHAP      NATL EHTS STD HAZ AP
                                                                                  28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
                                                                                  286         INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS
                                                                                  2869        INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS,  NEC
                                                                                  75-01-4     VINYL CHLORIDE

-------
NJ
 I
5.5. fit 37674 09-12-90
Standard* of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Small
Industrial-CosBMrcial-Inatitutional Steam Generating Units
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ISO

Abstract:  Final nil*.  This action promulgates *tandard« of perfor-
mane* for new, modified, and reconstructed small industrial-commer-
cial-institutional steam generating unit* with a maximum design h«at
input capacity of 29 MN (100 million Btu/hr) or !••«, but greater than
or equal to 2.9 MN (10 Billion  Btu/hr).  These standards, codified in
•ubpart DC of 40 CFR part 60, limit emissions of 502 and PM from these
sources.  This notice alao announces the EPA's decision not to regu-
late NOz emissions fro* these units.  Standards of performance limit-
ing emissions of S02, PM,  and NOz from small industrial-conaercial-in-
stitutional steam generating units were proposed in 54 FR 24792, 6-9-
89.  The standards implement Section 111 of the Clean Air Act and are
based on the Administrator' s determination that small industrial-com-
marcial-institutional steam generating units cause or contribute sig-
nificantly to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to en-
danger public health or welfare.  The intended effect of these stan-
dards is to require all new, modified, and reconstructed small indus-
I i I ill rnuMirlrl 1 nil II nl I mnil  steam generating units to control emis-
sions to the level achievable by the best demonstrated technological s
ystem of continuous emission reduction considering costs, nonair qual-
ity health, environmental, and  energy impacts.

CL-PM       PARTICULATE MATTER
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFRMNCE STD
11104-93-1  NITROGEN OXIDES
49          ELECTRIC, GAS, AND  SANITARY SERVICES
491         ELECTRIC SERVICES
4911        ELECTRIC SERVICES
7446-09-5   SULFUR DIOXIDE
55 FR 38057 09-17-90
Radionuclide NESHAP
EPA, Washington, DC, ORP

Abstract:  Notice of stay.  This action announces a further 180-day
stay, pending reconsideration and judicial review, of Subpart I of 40
CFR part 61 ("Subpart I"), National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants for Radionuclide Emissions from Facilities Licensed by
Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Non-DOE Federal Facilities  (54 FR
51654 12-15-89).  EPA is issuing this stay pursuant to the authority
inherent to EPA's general rulemaking authority under Clean Air Act
Section 301 (a), 42 USC 7601(a), and also pursuant to Section 10(d) of
the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 USC 705, which grants the Adminis-
trator discretion to postpone the effective date of Agency rules pend-
ing judicial review, which for Subpart I is ongong in the United
States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.  This action continues in
place of the existing stay originally granted by the Administrator
pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 307(d) (7) (B), 42 USC 7607(d) (7)(B),
54 FR 51654 (12-15-89), and subsequently extended pursuant to the pre-
sently applicable authorities on March 15, 1990, 55 FR 10455  (3-21-
90), and on July 12, 1990, 55 FR 29205  (7-18-90).

CL-RAD      RADIATION
EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NESHAP      NATL EMIS STD HAZ AP
10          METAL MINING
109         MISCELLANEOUS METAL ORES
1094        URANIUM-RADIUM-VANADIUM ORES
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
281         INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS
2819        INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS, NEC
49          ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
96          ADMINISTRATION OF ECONOMIC PROGRAMS
963         REGULATION,  ADMIN. OF UTILITIES
9631        REGULATION,  ADMIN. OF UTILITIES

-------
N>
 I
55 FR 40171  10-02-90
Standard*  of Performance for New Stationary Source* Amendments to
Subpart J  (Petroleum  Refineries) and Addition of Performance
Specification 7 to Appendix B
IPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC, EMB

Abstract:  Final rule.   The purpose of thi» action ia five-fold:   (1)
To require (aa opposed to being an option) the monitoring of sulfur
dioxide  (S02)  in gales discharged into the atmosphere from the com-
bustion of fuel gases or, as an alternative, the monitoring of hydro-
gen sulfide  (H2S) in  fuel gases; (2) to delete the mention of control-
ling  302 after combustion of fuel gases;  (3) to delete the monitoring
requirement  of H2S in gases discharged into the atmosphere from Claus
sulfur recovery plants,  but require the monitoring of other reduced
sulfur compounds using continuous emission monitoring systems (CEM's)
or SO2 CEMS's  after oxidizing the reduced sulfur compound* to S02; (4)
to add Performance Specification (PS) 7 for H2S CEKS's to Appendix B
of this part;  and (5)  to clarify ambiguities in the existing regula-
tions.  All  affected  fuel gas combustion devices and Claus plants in
petroleum  refineries,  subject to subpart J of 40 CFR part 60, will be
required to  install and operate GEMS' a within 1 year of the promulga-
tion  date.   These monitoring requirements are not new, but previous
H2S and reduced sulfur  CEMS installations were contingent upon the
Agency's promulgation of PS's.  These amendments were published in the
Federal Register on March 1,  1989 (54 FR 8564)  and April 28,  1989 (54
FR 18308).

EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR           FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS         MEN SRC PRFIMICE STD
29           PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
291          PETROLEUM REFINING
2911         PETROLEUM REFINING
7446-09-5    SULFUR DIOXIDE
7783-06-4    HYDROGEN  SULFIDE
 55 FR 40834  10-05-90
 National Emission Standards  for Radon Emissions  from Phosphogypsum
 Stacks
 EPA,  Washington,  DC,  ORP

 Abstract:  Notice of  compliance waiver.  This  action announces the
 continuation of a limited compliance  waiver, pending reconsideration
 and rulemaking, of subpart R of 40  CFR part  61 ("Subpart R"), National
 Emission Standards for  Radon Emissions from  Phosphogypsum Stacks  (54
 FR 51654 December 15, 1989).   EPA is  Issuing this  compliance waiver
 pursuant to  its authority under Clean Air Act  112(c) (1)(B)(11) and
 40 CFR 60.10-60.11.   This limited compliance waiver,  which permits the
 distribution and  use  of phosphogypsum for agricultural purposes,  tem-
 porarily continues the  existing limited compliance waiver, originally
 issued by the Administrator  on April  10, 1990  (55  FR 13480), pending
 final action on the ongoing  rulemaking proceedings,  but in no event
 beyond June  1,  1991.

 CL-PHOSPHA   PHOSPHATES
 EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
 NESHAP      NATL  PJOS STD HAZ AP
 10043-92-2   RADON
 28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
 281          INDUSTRIAL  INORGANIC CHEMICALS
 2819         INDUSTRIAL  INORGANIC CHEMICALS,  NEC
 287          AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
 2874         PHOSPHATIC  FERTILIZERS

 55 FR 40879  10-05-90
 Standards of Performance  for  New Stationary  Sources  and Emission
 Guidelines for  Existing Sources:  Municipal Waste  Combustors
 EPA,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC, ESD

 Abstract:  Supplemental  information on mercury emissions.  Standards
 of performance  (i.e.,  new wource performance standards) for new, modi-
 fied,  and reconstructed municipal waste combustors (MHC's) and emis-
 sion  guidelines for existing MWC's were proposed in the Federal Regis-
 ter on December 20, 1989  (54  FR 52209).  This  notice announces the
 availability of supplemental  information on mercury emissions from
MHC's  for review and comment.

 EPA          ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 FR           FED REGISTER  NOTICES
NSPS         NEW SRC PRFRMNCE  STD
 49           ELECTRIC,  GAS, AND  SANITARY SERVICES
 495          SANITARY SERVICES
 4953         REFUSE SYSTEMS
7439-97-6   MERCURY

-------
 I
«k
CO
55 FR 45804 10-31-90
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Benzene
Emissions from Chemical Manufacturing Process VEnts, Industrial
Solvent Us«, Benzene Wast* Operations, Benzene Transfer Operations,
and Gasolin* Marketing Systasi; Corraction
IPX, Research Triangle Park, HC, ESD

Abstract:  Final rule; correction.  This document clarifies the appli-
cability of Section 61.300(a) of the National Emission Standard for
Benzene Transfer Operations which was promulgated in the Federal Reg-
ister on Wednesday, March 7, 1990  (55 FR 8341).  This action is neces-
sary to clarify that the benzene transfer rule does not apply to the
loading of crude oil, natural gas liquids or petroleum distillates
such as fuel oil, diesel or kerosene.  It was never EPA's intent that
the benzene transfer rule apply to crude oil, natural gas liquids or
petroleum distillates.  The benzene content of these materials is well
below the 70 percent cutoff in the regulation and will never approach
this cutoff.  The notice also changes the applicability date of Sec-
61.300(e) of the regulation as it applies to the loading of benzene
into marine vessels.  This change is necessary to allow facilities
adequate time to design, purchase and install vapor control systems
that comply with the U.S. Coast Guard standards that were issued June
21, 1990 (55 FR 25396) and that are effective July 23,  1990.  This
correction is consistent with EPA' s intent to provide an industry-wide
waiver of 1 year so that facilities can take into consideration the
Coast Guard standards that address safe design,  installation and oper-
ation of marine vessel vapor control systems.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NESRAP      NATL SKIS STD HAZ AP
28          CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
286         INDUSTRIAL ORGANIC CHEMICALS
2865        CYCLIC CRUDES AND INTERMEDIATES
29          PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
291         PETROLEUM REFINING
2911        PETROLEUM REFINING
33          PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
331         BLAST FURNACE AND BASIC STEEL PRODUCTS
3312        BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS
49          ELECTRIC,  GAS,  AND SANITARY SERVICES
495         SANITARY SERVICES
4953        REFUSE SYSTEMS
51          WHOLESALE TRADE-NONDURABLE GOODS
517         PETROLEUM AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
5171        PETROLEUM BULK STATIONS 4 TERMINALS
5172        PETROLEUM PRODUCTS,  NEC
71-43-2     BENZENE
8006-61-9   GASOLINE
55 FR 48406 11-20-90
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Asbestos
NESHAP Revision
EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, ISB

Abstract:  Final rule.  This Federal Register notice promulgates rules
under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act for asbestos emissions and is
based on the Administrator's determination that asbestos presents a
significant risk to human health as a result of air emissions from one
or more source categories and is therefore a hazardous air pollutant
(see 36 FR 03031 03-31-71).  The purpose of the revisions promulgated
in this notice is to enhance enforcement and promote compliance with
the current standard without altering the stringency of existing con-
trols.  On January 10, 1989 the EPA proposed amendments to the asbes-
tos NESHAP that would require control device and fugitive emission
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting for asbestos milling, manu-
facturing, and fabricating operations.  For planned demolitions and
renovations, revisions to the notification requirements were proposed,
and safety was added as a reason for exemption from the use of wet re-
moval methods.  Recordkeeping requirements were proposed for asbestos
waste disposal.  Clarifying revisions to several definitions and pro-
visions were also proposed.   Numerous comments were received on the
proposed revisions,  and this notice responds to those comments,  and
incorporates changes as a result of those comments.  Corrections were
made at 56 FR 1669 1-16-91.

EPA         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR          FED REGISTER NOTICES
NESHAP      NATL EMIS STD HAZ AP
1332-21-4   ASBESTOS
15          GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS
152         RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
154         NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
16          HEAVY CONSTRUCTION,  EX. BUILDING
17          SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
179         MISC.  SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
1795        WRECKING AND DEMOLITION WORK

-------
 55  FR 51010  12-11-90
 Standard*  of Performance for Hew Stationary Source*; Polypropylene,
 Polyethylene,  Polystyrene,  and Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
 Manufacturing Industry
 EPA,  Research Triangle Park,  NC,  BSD

 Abstract:  Final rule.   Standard* of performance to limit volatile or-
 ganic compound (VOC)  emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed
 proce** sections at  certain polymer manufacturing plant* were proposed
 in  the Federal Register on  9-30-87  (52 FR 36676) .  A new approach for
 determining  which proce*• emt**ion* from polypropylene and polyethyl-
 ene production would be subject to the proposed standards was pre-
 •ented for public comment in  the Federal Register on 1-10-89 (54 FR
 890).  Thi*  action promulgate* these standards of performance for
 polypropylene,  polyethylene,  and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)
 plants.  These standard* implement Section 111 of the Clean Air Act
 and are based on the  Administrator's determination that emissions froa
 these polymer manufacturing facilities cause,  or contribute signifi-
 cantly to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to en-
 danger public health  or welfare.  The intended effect of these stan-
 dard* i* to  require all new,  modified,  and reconstructed process sec-
 tions at these polymer  manufacturing plants to achieve emission levels
 that reflect  the be*t demonstrated system of continuous emi**ion re-
 duction considering costs,  non-air quality health, and environmental
 and energy impact*.

CL-VOC      VOLATILE  ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
EPA         ENVIROtMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FR           FED REGISTER NOTICES
NSPS        NEW SRC PRFFMNCE  STD
25038-59-9  POLY (OXYETHYLENE  OXYTEREPHTBALOYL)
25322-69-4   POLYPROPYLENE GLYCOL
30          ROBBER AND MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS
308         MISCELLANEOUS PLASTICS PRODUCTS,  NEC
 9002-88-4   POLYETHYLENE
9003-53-6   STYRENE,  POLYMERS

-------
                      APPENDIX A

INDEX TO NATIONAL AIR TOXICS INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE
     NEWSLETTER:  DECEMBER  1983 THROUGH MAY 1991

-------
ABOUT THE NEWSLETTERS

      The National Air Toxics  Information Clearinghouse Newsletter is
published by the Clearinghouse to  inform interested persons of current
activities related to toxic air pollutants.  To be placed on the mailing list,
contact the Clearinghouse staff at  (919) 541-0850 or (FTS) 629-0850.

HOW TO USE THIS INDEX

      Alphabetically arranged key word headings (in boldface type) are
followed by a subheading describing the context in which the key word appears
in the indexed Newsletter article.  The title of the article itself is not
given since, for example, an article on California's process of identifying
and controlling toxic air pollutants might discuss at length,  or, at the other
end of the scale,  briefly mention, a good many topics of interest to
Newsletter readers.  Both broad topics of discussion and brief mentions of an
item are indexed for the sake of completeness.
      The subentry is followed in turn by a locator consisting of the
Newsletter month and year plus page number on which the information may be
found.  Subsequent references to the key word in other Newsletters are
separated by semicolons and have their own subentry phrases as necessary.
Thus,  the entry, Acetaldehvde. tells the reader that he may find that
substance referred to in the context of California's air toxics identification
and control  process on page 5 of the December 1984 Newsletter.   The second
locator tells the  reader that further information  on acetaldehyde in  the same
context (in this case,  California revised the list mentioned in the
December 1984 article)  may be found on page 6 of the May 1985  issue.
      A number in  parentheses is the page number assigned  by order; the first
issue  of the Newsletter did not have page numbers.
                                     A-l

-------
AALs:  See Ambient levels, acceptable

Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI):  Jan 1988, 5; compared to RfDs, July 1988, 6-7

Accidental releases:  Sept 1990, 4; and Houston regional monitoring program,
      Mar 1988, 10; Houston program and, May 1988, 4; Massachusetts air toxics
      provisions for, Jan 1989, 2; New Jersey proposes rule to cover,
      Mar 1988, 6-7; possible TDI releases studied by CTC, June 1987, 4-5;
      prevention of specified in Clean Air Act amendments, July 1990, 9;
      symposium held on, Dec 1986, 11; TACB permit review and, Jan 1988, 2-3;
      training course to prevent, Mar 1987, 5

Acetaldehyde:  May 1985, 6; May 1990, 8; and California Air Resources
      Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; California
      versus source test method for, Mar 1991, 7-8; verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Acetone:  May 1988, 5; May 1990, 5, 6; and Michigan's use of air stripping of
      VOCs, Dec 1985, 4

Acetophenone:  RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

ACGIH TLV:  basis for South Carolina air toxics limits, Jan 1991, 2-3;
      hazardous substances, workplace exposure guidelines for, Sept 1986, 3;
      and KFEL, Jan 1988, 6; and Maine's air toxics control program, Dec 1983
      (7); and Massachusetts air toxics control program, Sept 1984, 5; and
      NESCAUM regional strategy to control perchloroethylene, Dec 1985, 6-7;
      not used in Kentucky regulation, May 1988, 2; and Ohio interim air
      toxics policy, Mar 1987, 3; for urea, Nov 1988, 5; use of factored TLV
      in regulating air toxics, Mar 1987, 4; used in air toxics limits by New
      Mexico, Jan 1991, 3-4; used in Florida air toxics standards, Mar 1991,
      4; used in Mississippi permit review program, Dec 1986, 5; used by New
      York in methylene chloride limits, Sept 1989, 4-5; used in Puget Sound
      air toxics rule, Nov 1990, 1; used in Virginia regulation, Dec 1989, 4;
      and Wisconsin's air toxics program, Sept 1986, 3; and Virginia Air
      Pollution Control Board rules, Dec 1984, 5-6

Acid gases:  as products of resource recovery facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9; BACT
      required for biomedical waste incineration in Oklahoma, May 1991, 4, 7

Add scrubbing:  tested in hospital sterilizers, May 1988, 9-10

Acrolein:  May 1985, 6; May 1988, 5; and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; verified RfC,
      Nov 1990, 2

Acrylamide:  RfC, non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

Acrylic acid:  verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Acrylic fibers:  and EPA prototype scheme for handling,, Sept 1984, 3
                                      A-2

-------
Acrylonitrile:  May  1985, 6; May  1990, 8; and EPA report on locating and
      estimating emissions of, Dec  1985,  11; EPA-sponsored workshop on,
      June 1986, 11; regulatory status of under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985,  10;
      and California Air Resources  Contaminant Identification and Control
      Process, Dec 1984, 5;  EPA  prototype scheme for handling, Sept 1984, 3;
      EPA report on, July 1984, 6;  Ohio evaluation of, Mar 1987, 2;
      State/local option to evaluate prior to regulation, Dec 1984, 8-9;  TACB
      reviews sources of, Jan 1988, 3

Actionable levels:  and drafting  carcinogen policy, Dec 1983 (6)

Acute Hazards List:  and EPA's air  toxics strategy, Aug 1985, 5-6

Aerometrlc Information Retrieval  System (AIRS):  introduced by EPA,
      Jan 1989, 9-10; 13

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR):  releases
      toxicological profile, July 1989, 10-11

Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory (AEERL):  Jan 1988, 8; develops
      indoor air pollution sources document, Jan 1991, 4-5; functions of,
      Feb 1985, 2-3; issues hazardous air pollutant report, Sept 1986,  11;
      plans indoor air pollution  sources reports,  Jan 1991, 4-5; studies
      indoor air pollution sources, Mar 1991, 4-5

Air Pathway Analysis:  May 1988,  7; conducted at Superfund hazardous waste
      sites,  Nov 1988,  8; OAQPS Guide revised,  Jan 1991, 2

Air pollutants, hazardous:   See Air pollutants,  toxic

Air pollutants, toxic:   See also entries under individual  States;  May 1985,
      2-3; May 1985,  7;  June 1986, 2-4; June 1986,  8-10; Sept 1986,  10;
      Dec 1986, 10; Sept 1987,  8-9; Nov 1987, 8-9;  Jan 1989,  13; Sept 1990, 4;
      air toxics program development guidance available (report),  Mar 1986, 6;
      benzene as contributor to problem of,  Sept 1984, 2-3;  and CAA
      reauthorization,  Apr 1984,  3-4;   and cancer,  Apr 1984,  6;  and Chemical
      Emergency Preparedness Program (CEPP),  June  1986,  2-4;  director of
      coordinating groups for,  July 1984,  3;  list  of chemicals  and their
      regulatory status,  Dec 1985, 10;  data  base cross-references  with  source,
      Sept 1990,  9; defined,  Dec 1983  (1);  development of State and local
      control  programs  for,  Dec 1983 (4);  developing standards  for,  Dec 1983
      (4-5);  emissions  data requested  by EPA, Mar  1987,  11-12;  and emissions
      inventory procedures,  Mar 1986,  11;  and EPA  meeting  with  industry
      leaders,  May 1990,  9;  and EPA prototype scheme for handling  high
      Individual  risk/low national incidence, Sept  1984,  3;  EPA  reports on,
      Sept 1984,  2; EPA/OAQPS screening study to monitor,  Dec 1986,  10; and
      EPA Six Months  Study,  Apr 1984,  4-5; and  EPA strategy to  control,
      Aug 1985,  3-5;  and  EPA strategy  to control both routine and  accidental
      releases,  Aug 1985,  5-7;  and Harvard School  of Public Health project,
      May 1985,  7;  hazardous  air pollutant prioritization  system (HAPPS),
      Feb 1984,  5;   information  on through NATICH/TRIS link,  Dec 1989,  1-2;


                                     A-3

-------
Air pollutants, toxic (continued):  link with cancer studied, Nov 1988, 9; and
      list of current projects on, May 1985, 2; list of hazardous air
      pollutants under proposed Clean Air Act revisions,, May 1 MYDP,  permit
      review support evaluated by EPA, Mar 1987, 11;  dispersion,
      transformation models needed, Jan 1988, 8; NATICH report on State/local
      air toxics agency activities, Dec 1984, 1;  and NESCAUM control policy
      guideline, Dec 1983 (6); and NESCAUM regional  strategy for
      perchloroethylene,  Dec 1985, 6-7; and new APCA committee, Aug 1985, 9;
      nonaccidental  releases of, Nov 1987, 10; noncarcinogenic, Dec 1984, 2;
      OAQPS publishes program manual, Sept 1990, 9;  OAQPS reports on,
      Jan 1988, 10-11; and ozone attainment, Nov 1987, 4-5; Region VI
      accidental release program, June 1986, 4-5; research needs highlighted,
      Jan 1988, 7-8; and State/local air pollution control agencies,
      Sept 1984, 3;  STAPPA/ALAPCO conference on, Dec 1985, 8-9; STAPPA/ALAPCO
      policy on, Feb 1985, 4-5; STAPPA/ALAPCO nationwide survey on, Feb 1984,
      6; STAPPA/ALAPCO survey of strategies on, Nov 1988, 9-10; training
      course to prevent accidental releases of, Mar 1987, 5; vegetation damage
      from, Feb 1985, 4

Air pollutants, toxic - State programs:  California Air Resources Board list
      of, May 1985,  6; California agency program to reduce, Dec 1986, 3-4;
      California agency's study of in-car exposure described, June 1987, 3;
      California to  compile list of, July 1988, 5-6; California rule on
      permits, carcinogens, Mar 1989, 5-7; California rule governing,
      Mar 1988, 2, 4-5; Connecticut's regulation to control, Sept 1986, 4;
      defined by Louisiana regulation, Dec 1989, 2;  EPA Control Technology
      Center instituted,  Dec 1986, 2; EPA encourages control of, Jan 1989,
      3-6; EPA strategy for, Aug 1985, 3-5; and EPA strategy for routine and
      accidental releases, Aug 1985, 5-7; Indiana prepares regulation,
      May 1990, 1, 8; Kentucky regulation of, May 1988, 2-3; Louisiana program
      on, Dec 1989,  2-3;  and Maine air toxics inventory, Sept 1984, 4;
      Maryland adopts comprehensive regulations for, Jari 1989, 10-12; Maryland
      agency divides into two classes, Sept 1987, 4; Maryland assesses air
      toxics reduction, Mar 1991, 5-6; Massachusetts monitoring of, Jan 1989,
      2-3; and Massachusetts program, Sept 1984, 5;  Michigan establishes
      health-based program to address, May 1990, 6-7; Nebraska regulation
      convening, Sept 1989, 2-3; New Mexico sets limits for, Jan 1991, 3-4;
      New York, New Jersey Region II study, Sept 1990, 5-6; and New York toxic
      air contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7-8; North Carolina
      reviews list of for regulation, Mar 1987, 4; North Carolina adopts new
      regulation, Mar 1990, 1-2; and Puget Sound asbestos regulation,
      Mar 1986, 8;  Puget Sound regulates, Nov 1990, 1; RAPCA emissions data
      base described, June 1987, 10; Rhode Island amends nuisance regulation,
      Jan 1991, 1-2; Rhode Island program to monitor solvents in ambient air,
      Mar 1987, 5-6; South Carolina regulates, Jan 1991, 2-3; Texas assesses
      health impacts of existing sources, May 1991,  1-2; Vermont regulations
      on, July 1989, 3-4; and Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board
      rules, Dec 1984, 5-6; Washington State proposes regulation to limit
      woodstove emissions, June 1987, 6-7; Wisconsin authority upheld in
      industry challenge, Nov 1990, 4; Wisconsin program on, Sept 1986, 2-4
                                      A-4

-------
Air Pollution Control Association  (APCA), annual meeting of:  abstracts of
      papers, Sept  1984, 6-7; specialty conference on toxic air pollutants
      (announced),  Aug  1985, 9; and new air toxics committee, Aug  1985, 9

Air RISC:  Mar 1991, 2, 5; July 1989, 11; May 1990, 3-4; May 1991, 9;
      distributes risk  communication publications, Mar 1991, 6-7;  function of
      Nov 1988, 4-5; introduction  of, July 1988, 4-5; issues risk  assessment
      glossary, Sept 1989, 10; new projects, Sept 1990, 10; plans  waste
      combustor brochures, May 1991, 10; presents workshop on risk assessment,
      Mar 1989, 5;  publishes health effects summary for steel mills, Nov 1990,
      9; recent requests described, Jan 1991, 5; recent services highlighted,
      Jan 1989, 9;  services of, July 1988, 4-5; testifies in Virginia carbon
      disulfide case, Dec 1989, 5

A1r stripping:  EPA issues directive on use of, Dec 1989, 9; report on
      published by  CTC, June 1987, 5; technical guidance for prepared by CTC,
      Mar 1988, 9;  and  vacuum extraction, Jan 1990, 10; and VOCs during
      groundwater cleanup, Dec 1985, 2-3

Air toxics control:  See also Control technology; environmental group/industry
      views on, Dec 1983 (4); EPA  Control Technology Center instituted, Dec
      1986, 2; EPA  encourages control of, Jan 1989, 3-6; EPA/AEERL report on,
      Sept 1986, 11; EPA strategy  for, Aug 1985, 3-5; and EPA strategy for
      routine and accidental release, Aug 1875, 5-7; and EPA strategy to
      control both  routine and accidental releases, June 1986, 8-10;
      Federal/State/local role in, Dec 1983 (4); and Federal grant support
      program for, Aug  1984, 4-5;  integrated approaches to, Dec 1983 (5);
      integrated approach to, Feb  1984, 4; and NATICH data base contents,
      June 1986, 1-2; NESCAUM control policy guideline, Dec 1983 (6); and
      Region VI inspection program, June 1986, 4-5; relation of ozone
      attainment policy to, Nov 1987, 4-5; 1983 workshop on, Feb 1984, 3-5;
      workshops for State and local agencies on, Dec 1986,  2

Air toxics control  - State programs:  California agency proposes chromium
      rule, Mar 1988, 4-5; coordinators attend retreats to share ideas,
      Jan 1990, 3;  Maryland's department of the environment described,
      Sept 1987, 3-4; Monterey Bay agency described, Mar 1988, 2-4; new
      Mississippi  permit review program outlined, Dec 1986, 5; Ohio Division
      of Air Pollution Control Management described, Mar 1987, 2;  Ontario's
      assessment and, Mar 1988,  7;  South Coast Air Quality Management
      district described, June 1; South Dakota Department of Water and Natural
      Resources described, Nov 1987, 3; STAPPA/ALAPCO conference on,
      Sept 1986, 10; and State integration,  July 1984,  2

Air Toxics Exposure and Risk Information System (ATERIS):   May 1990, 1

Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse:  See NATICH

A1r toxics programs:  "model" State, Aug 1985,  3; and MYDPs, Sept  1987, 13-14

Air toxics regulatory process:  overview of,  Feb 1984,  5


                                     A-5

-------
Alaska:   analyzes  wood  smoke,  Nov  1987,  3-4,  spotlight on  ammonia  standards,
       Mar 1991,  1-2;  urea  dust in,  Nov  1988,  4-5

Alkenes:   and  IARC evaluation  of wood smoke photo-oxidation products,
       June 1986, 5

Ally!  chloride:  May  1985,  6;  and  California  Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification  and Control Process, Dec  1984, 5; listed as
       Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance in  New Jersey, Sept 1986, 5

Ambient air:   California agency's  monitoring  program for, June 1987, 3;
       characterization  of,  Feb 1984, 4;  impacts upon from California ethylene
       oxide emissions,  July 1990,  2; monitoring studies of, Feb 1984, 4;
       sampling of  in  Alaska, Nov 1987, 3-4; standards for and South Dakota air
       toxics program, Nov  1987, 3;  State ambient air quality standards
       (AAQSs), Sept 1986,  4; TAC emissions limits for defined by California
       rule, Mar  1988, 3-4

Ambient levels,  acceptable  (AALs):  emissions  from Superfund sites studied,
       May 1988,  6-7;  EPA report on, Jan  1989,  13; how derived in Rhode Island
       air toxics regulation, Sept  1988,  2-3;  information in NATICH data base,
       July 1989, 1; Maryland regulation  requirements for, Jan 1989, 11-12; and
       Massachusetts'  air toxics control  program, Sept 1984, 5; Massachusetts
       sets method  to  derive, Jan 1990, 4; NATICH report on, May 1985, 2;
       NESCAUM  control policy guideline,  Dec 1983 (6); for new source review
       developed  by FLATWG,  Mar 1991, 4;  and New York's toxic air contaminant
       stack assessment  program, Aug 1985, 7; sampled in IACP Boise study,
       May 1988,  6; TACB monitoring  of, Jan 1988, 3; topic at STAPPA/ALAPCO
       conference,  Dec 1984, 2; used in New York's research recovery stack
       emissions  assessment  program, Sept 1986, 8; used by PSAPCA to rank
       risks, July  1988, 2;  used in  Rhode Island nuisance' evaluation, Jan 1991,
       1-2; Wisconsin  definitions of, Sept 1986, 3-4

Ambient levels, allowable:  basis for South Carolina's described,
       Jan  1991, 2-3

Ambient monitoring:   Florida seeking information on, Dec 1986, 11; Houston
       program  and, May  1988, 4; information in NATICH data base,  July 1989,
       1-2; Kentucky's plan  for described, May  1988, 3; TACB evaluates short-
       term impacts with, May 1991,   1-2

American  Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists:   See ACGIH

Ammonia:   July 1990,  9; Alaska sets air quality standards for, Mar 1991,  1-2;
       Maryland Consent Orders to reduce, Mar 1991,  5-6;  Nebraska investigates
       emission impacts of,  Sept 1989,  3; de-listed in proposed Clean Air Act,
       May  1990, 9; toxicity of, Nov 1988, 5; and urea plant in Alaska ammonia
       standard, Mar 1991, 1-2

Ammonium  sulfate:  measurement of in IACP project to identify airborne
       carcinogens, Mar  1986, 7


                                     A-6

-------
APCA:  See Air Pollution Control Association

Anhydrous ammonia:  July 1990, 9

Anhydrous hydrogen chloride:  July 1990, 9

Anhydrous sulfur dioxide:  July 1990, 9

Anthropogenic emissions:  NAPAP prepares inventory of data, May 1989, 9-10

Aniline:  and damage to vegetation, Feb 1985, 4; verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Anodizing facilities:  Nov 1990, 1

Area sources:  and cancer risk, Jan 1989, 4; CTC studies regulation of,
      Sept 1988, 5; defined under proposed Clean Air Act amendments, Mar 1990,
      10; OAQPS document on estimating emissions from, Sept 1989, 9-10

Aromatics:  and IARC evaluation of wood smoke photo-oxidation products,
      June 1986, 5

Arsenic:  May 1985, 6; Dec 1986, 10; Jan 1989, 4; Jan 1990, 7; Mar 1990, 7;
      May 1990, 5, 6; and California Air Resources Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; and EPA rulemaking on, Sept 1984, 9;
      as contributor to air toxics problem, Sept 1984, 2-3; and New York's
      toxic air contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; Ohio
      evaluation of, Mar 1987, 2; Oklahoma limits biomedical waste incinerator
      emissions, May 1991, 4; TACB reviews sources of, Jan 1988, 3

Arsine:  Sept 1988, 4

Asbestos:  May 1985, 6; Jan 1989, 4; and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; Florida county adopts
      fee schedule for, Sept 1990, 3; Florida NESHAP enforcement delegated,
      Sept 1990, 4; model inspection program nears completion, Mar 1987,
      10-11; NESHAP enforcement in California, June 1987, 2-3; Ohio NESHAP
      enforcement, Mar 1987, 2; Puget Sound Air Pollution Control  Agency
      regulation adopted on, Mar 1986, 8

Ash:  as product of resource recovery facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9; sampled at
      city incinerator, Sept 1986, 9

Association of Local Air Pollution Control  Officials (ALAPCO):  See State and
      Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators (STAPPAJ/Association of
      Local  Air Pollution Control Officials (ALAPCO)

Atmospheric deposition:  subject of Puget Sound Study, Dec 1989, 3-4

Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory (ASRL):  Jan 1988, 8

Automated Woodstove Emissions Sampler (AWES):  Dec 1986,  9


                                     A-7

-------
 Automobile  air  conditioners:   Oregon  rule  controls  CFC-12,  Nov  1990,  7-8

 Automobile  refinishing:   Sept  1988, 4;  Nov  1990,  1

 Automobiles:  California  standards  for, Mar  1990, 3-4

 Averaging times:   and  NESCAUM  control policy guideline, Dec  1983  (6)

 BACT:   See  Best Available Control Technology (BACT)

 Benzene:  May 1985, 6; May  1989, 9; July 1989, 7, 9; May 1990,  5, 6,  8; and
      California Air Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process,
      Dec 1984, 5; carcinogenicity  of emissions,  Feb 1984, 3; CAA Section  112
      ruling on, Feb 1984,  2-3; as  contributor to air toxics problem,
      Sept  1984, 2-3;  EPA publishes report on, May  1988, 10-11; and EPA/IEMD
      ambient monitoring  program, Apr 1984, 5-6;  EPA/OAQPS report on  emissions
      of, Mar 1988, 11; and EPA rulemaking on three source categories,
      Sept  1984, 9; EPA rules to reduce emissions of, Dec 1989, 11; four
      approaches for NESHAP outlined, Sept 1988, 9-11; health impacts assessed
      in gasoline  study,  Dec 1989,  6-8; Indiana rule to reduce  emissions of,
      May 1990, 8; Maryland Consent Orders to reduce, Mar 1991, 5-6;  and
      Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec  1985, 4; and fugitive
      emissions at petroleum refineries/chemical manufacturing  plants,
      Feb 1984, 2; NESHAP specifications for, Sept  1987, 12; Wisconsin
      authority to regulate sources upheld, Nov 1990, 4-5

Benzene storage and transfer:  as benzene emissions source, Sept 1988, 10; EPA
      rulemaking on, Sept 1984, 9;  EPA rules on emissions from, Dec 1989,  11;
      and CAA rulemaking, Feb 1984, 2

Benzene waste operations: EPA proposes regulation of benzene from, Dec 1989,


Benzo(a)pyrene:   Dec 1986, 10;  July 1988,  2,  3; Jan 1989,,  9; Mar 1990, 7;
      May 1990,  8; as emission  from residential wood combustion devices,
      May 1985,  3-5; and New York's toxic air contaminant stack assessment
      program,  Aug 1985,  7;  study of,  Sept 1984,  2

Benzoic acid:  May 1990,  5,  6;  use of residue for fuel,  Jan 1988,  4

Benzyl chloride:  May 1985,  6;  and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control  Process,  Dec 1984,  5

Beryllium:   May 1985,  6;  July 1989,  10;  May 1990,  5, 6;  and California Air
      Resources Contaminant  Identification and Control  Process,  Dec 1984,  5;
      and New York's toxic air  contaminant stack assessment program,
      Aug 1985,  7

Best Available  Control  Technology (BACT):   Sept 1988,  3,  13;  Jan 1989, 5;
      Jan 1989,  11; Mar 1990, 6;  May 1991,  1;  applied to municipal  waste
      incinerators, Sept  1987,  9;  BACT/LAER Clearinghouse,  Jan  1989,  6;  and


                                     A-8

-------
 Best  Available  Control  Technology (BACT)  (continued):   California's  air  toxics
       control program,  Dec  1983,(7);  California  agency  rule  defines,  Mar 1988,
       3;  and Michigan's air toxics  control  program,  Feb 1984,  4;  NESCAUM
       adopts guideline  for,  Jan  1989,  6-7;  specified in Kentucky  regulation,
       May 1988,  3;  cited in California rule on carcinogens,  Mar 1989,  6-7; New
       Mexico requires for new  carcinogen  sources, Jan 1991,  3-4;  New Mexico's
       definition is technology-based,  Jan 1991,  3-4; evaluated for New York
       film manufacturing facility,  Sept 1989, 4-5; required  by Indiana
       regulation, May 1990,  1, 8; required  by Puget  Sound, Nov 1990,  1;
       required  on Oklahoma  biomedical  waste incinerators, May  1991,  4, 7; for
       suspected  carcinogens  in Wisconsin, Nov 1990,  4;  T-BACT  required in
       California proposed rule, June  1987,  2; T-BACT required  in  Maryland's
       proposed  air  toxics regulations,  Sept 1987, 3; Texas Air Control Board
       program,  Jan  1988,  2-4;  and Wisconsin's hazardous  air  pollutant  program,
       Sept 1986, 3

 Blphenyl:  RfC  non-verifiable, Nov  1990,  3

 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate:  May  1990,  5

 Boilers:  Jan 1988,  4

 Bromine:   July  1990, 9;  listed as  Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance in New
       Jersey, Sept  1986,  5

 Bromodichloromethane:   May  1990, 5

 Bromomethane:  verified  RfC, Nov 1990,  2

 "Brown Cloud" study:  conducted in Denver,  Jan 1990,  2,   11

 Bulletin board system:  ORD's Center for  Environmental Research,  Mar 1991, 10

 Burden of proof:  and drafting carcinogen policy, Dec 1983 (6)

 Butadiene, 1,3-:  Sept  1987, 12; California VOC source test method includes,
      Mar 1991,  7-8; High Risk Point Source study on, May 1991, 8-9;  OAQPS
      publishes  emission report on,  Jan 1990, 1;  regulatory status of under
      Clean Air Act, Dec 1985,  10

Butyl benzylphthalate:  May 1990,  5

Cadmium:  May 1985,  6; Dec 1986,  10; Sept  1987,  8;  Jan 1990,  7; Mar 1990, 7;
      May 1990,  5,  6; and California Air Resources  Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec  1984, 5; Clean Air Act Amendments  require
      municipal  waste combustor standard for, Mar 1991,  8-9;  as contributor to
      air toxics problem, Sept  1984, 2-3;  and New York's toxic air contaminant
      stack assessment program, Aug  1985,  7; Oklahoma limits  biomedical waste
      incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4;  regulatory  status  of under  Clean Air
      Act, Dec  1985, 10; as  product  of resource  recovery facilities,  Mar  1986,
      8-9
                                     A-9

-------
California:  See also California Air Resources Board (CARB), Santa Barbara
      APCD, South Coast/AQMD; air toxics control program case study, Feb 1984,
      4; air toxics control program, Dec 1983 (4); co-sponsors municipal waste
      combustion workshop. Mar 1987, 8; develops noncancer risk assessment,
      Jan 1990, 5-6; initiates "hot spots" information program, July 1988,
      5-6; local agency program to reduce toxic air contamination risk,
      Dec 1986, 3-4; proposed carcinogen policy of, Dec 1983 (5);
      Proposition 65 and ethylene oxide rule, July 1990, 3; publishes toxics
      directory, July 1990, 8; spotlight on Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution
      Control District, Mar 1988, 2-4

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA):  publishes
      manual on source assessment, Dec 1986,  4; risk assessment guidelines
      complemented by Santa Barbara model, Nov 1990, 8-9

California Air Resources Board (CARB):  amends source test methods,  Mar 1991,
      7-8; contaminant identification and control  process, Dec 1984, 3-5;
      establishes rule covering permits, carcinogens, Mar 1989, 5-7; and new
      public information program, July 1988,  5-6;  prepares regulation for "hot
      spots," Mar 1990, 2, 3, 10; and prioritized  list of potential  toxic air
      contaminants, May 1985, 6

California Department of Health Services:  California site mitigation (toxic
      clean up) document prepared by, Mar 1986, 6

Canada:  Region V conducts transboundary project with,  May 1989,  5-6

Cancer, risk of:  See also Carcinogens; Risk  assessment; associated  with urban
      air toxics, Sept 1987,  7; as basis for  permit application review,
      Dec 1986, 5; from benzene emissions, Dec 1989, 11; Chicago risk
      assessment and, Mar 1989, 10-11; covered in  Massachusetts AAS, Jan 1990,
      4; effects of gasoline vapors on, Dec 1989,  6-8;  EPA issues report on,
      May 1989, 10; and EPA's six-month study, Jan 1989, 7; HEM II assesses,
      May 1991, 3; how determined in Mississippi permit review program,
      Dec 1986, 5; information on 205 facilities posing greatest risk,
      May 1990, 1, 2, 9; and landfill gas-fired projects,  July 1990, 6; link
      with air toxics studied, Nov 1988, 9; mentioned in Maine radon study,
      June 1987, 7; NPPB issues document on,  Sept  1989,  10; proposed
      regulation to TSDFs to remove, July 1989, 10; and radon emissions from
      uranium in soil, Mar 1986, 3-5; reduced by control of air strippers,
      Dec 1989, 9; reduced by control of PM and VOC, Nov 1987,  5; related to
      point and area sources, Jan 1989, 4; and relationship to toxic air
      pollutants, May 1985, 2-3; Vermont regulates compounds that contribute
      to, July 1989, 3

Carbon-14:  Nov 1988, 3-4; as tracer for wood smoke, Mar 1986,  7

Carbon adsorption:  as VOC control technology, Dec 1985, 3
                                     A-10

-------
 Carbon  dioxide:   and  New York's  toxic  air  contaminant  stack  assessment
      program, Aug  1985,  7;  as product of  resource  recovery  facilities,
      Mar  1986,  8-9

 Carbon  dlsulfide:   May  1989,  9;  May  1990,  5; emissions violate Virginia
      regulation, Dec 1989,  4-5;  verified  RfC, Nov  1990, 2

 Carbon  monoxide:  Sept  1990,  4;  Dec  1986,  8; July 1990, 7; as emission from
      residential wood  combustion devices, May 1985, 4-5; and NESCAUM
      automobile  emission  standards, Mar 1990, 3,4; and New  York's toxic air
      contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; Oklahoma limits
      biomedical waste  incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4; as product of
      resource recovery facilities,  Mar 1986, 8-9;  and wood  heater NSPS,
      Dec  1986, 7

 Carbon  tetrachlorlde:   May 1985, 6;  Dec 1985, 11; Sept 1987, 12; Mar 1989, 11;
      July 1989, 7,9; May  1990, 8; as  contributor to air toxics problem,
      Sept 1984, 2-3; and California Air Resources  Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; and EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring
      program, Apr  1984, 5-6; EPA reports  on, July  1984, 6;  link to ozone
      depletion, May  1989, 7-8; and Michigan's use  of air stripping' of VOCs,
      Dec 1985, 4;  regulatory status of under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985,  10

Carbonyls:  measured  in Boise, May 1988, 4-5

Carcinogenic Assessment Group (CAG):  Jan  1988,  9

Carcinogens:   See also Cancer, risk of; IRIS; Mutagens; May  1985,  3-5;
      Dec 1989, 6-8; and air pollution, report on,  Apr 1984,  6;  Air RISC
      addresses styrene as a, Jan 1991, 5;  and benzene emissions,  Feb 1984, 3;
      considered in NESCAUM perchloroethylene document, Sept 1986,  11;  and EPA
      air toxics strategy, Aug 1985,  3-5;  and EPA air toxics strategy,
      June 1986,  8;  and  EPA emissions inventories,  June 1986, 10;  EPA risk
      assessment guidelines available on,  July 1988, 11;  and EPA Six Months
      Study,  Apr 1984, 4-5; in halogenated  solvents  releases, Nov  1987,  7-8;
      HERL develops method to evaluate genetic activity of,  July 1988,  8-9;
      incinerator emissions and,  Sept 1986, 9;  and  IACP evaluation  of wood
      smoke photo-oxidation products, June  1986,  5-6;  inhaled gasoline  vapor
      as,  Sept 1984, 9;  and International Agency  for Research on  Cancer  (IARC)
      list of, Dec 1983  (6);  and  IACP field studies, Dec  1985,  5-6;  IACP
      project to  identify airborne,  Mar 1986,  7;  measured  in  IACP Roanoke
      Study,  Jan  1990, 7-8;  measured  in IACP  sugar beet  study, May  1988, 4-5;
      measured in IACP study  of woodstoves, Dec 1986,  9-10;   NATICH  report  on
      risk assessment  for,  Mar 1987,  1; PCD-dioxins  as,  Sept  1986, 8; and  '
      proposed standards on radionuclides,  Dec  1984, 7-8;  risk assessment
      document released, Jan  1990,  9; and STAPPA/ALAPCO  policy on hazardous
      air  pollutants,  Feb 1985, 4-5;  and toxic air pollutants, Sept  1984,  2-3;
      and  toxic air  pollutants, June  1986,  1;  residential wood combustion
      emissions,  Feb 1985,  3;  and VOCs,  Dec 1984, 3
                                    A-ll

-------
Carcinogens - State programs: Dec 1985, 3; Nov 1987,3-4; California's proposed
      rule on new source review, June 1987, 2; and California Air Resources
      Board Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec  1984, 3-5; and
      California's proposed policy on, Dec 1983 (5); California  rule covers
      permits and, Mar 1989, 5-7; epidemiological investigations encouraged by
      California's air toxics program, Dec 1986, 4; hazardous air pollutants
      listed by ACGIH, Sept 1986, 3-4; how treated in Maryland air toxics
      regulations, Sept 1987, 4; how treated in Mississippi permit review
      program, Dec 1986, 5; intervention defined with respect to control of,
      Dec 1983 (5-6); method to assess as toxic air pollutant, Mar 1987, 4;
      new ethylene oxide rule written for California, July 1990, 2-3; New
      Jersey program to control emissions of, July 1989, 7; New Mexico
      requires BACT for new sources of, Jan 1991, 3-4; Philadelphia air toxics
      control program lists, July 1989, 9; and results of Chicago emissions
      inventory, Mar 1987, 7; risk from in Kansas air toxics strategy,
      Jan 1988, 7; treated in California's rule on toxic air contaminants,
      Mar 1988, 3; Wisconsin requires LAER for, BACT for suspected
      carcinogens, Nov 1990, 4

Catalytic oxidation:  tested in hospital  sterilizers, May 1988, 9-10

CDDs/CDFs:  See Dioxins, Dibenzofurans

Centers for Disease Control (CDC):   Sept 1986,  9

Chamber studies:  used in indoor air emission evaluations,  Mar 1989,  8

Chattanooga-Hamilton County APCB:  cobalt oxide permitting  proceeding,
      Jan 1988, 4-6; conducts High Risk Point Source study, May 1991, 8-9

Chemical Activities Status (CAS):  report (1982),  July 1984,  3

Chemical Coordination Publications List:   abstracts from, July 1984,  2-4

Chemical designation:   and statutes,  July 1984, 3

Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program (CEPP):  Dec 1985,  8-9; June  1986, 3;
      contents of, June 1986,  2-4;  and hotline, Dec 1985, 11;  related to SARA
      Title III,  Dec 1986,  6

Chemical industry:  Mar 1988,  7; fugitive emissions from, Jan  1990,  2-3; and
      hazardous organic NESHAP, Sept  1987,  12;  New Jersey's chemical  accident
      prevention legislation and, Sept 1986,  5-6;  New Source Performance  •
      Standards (NSPS) for, Dec 1985,  8;  and  Region 6 accidental  release
      inspection program,  June 1986,  4-5;  symposium held on accident
      prevention for,  Dec 1986, 11

Chemical Information Resource Handbook:   publication of by  EPA, Feb  1984,  8

Chemical Manufacturers Association:   Community  Awareness and Emergency Program
      of (CAEP),  June 1986, 3


                                     A-12

-------
 Chemical manufacturing  plants:   benzene  fugitive  emissions  from,  Feb  1984,  2;
       as source  of  toxic  air  pollutants  causing vegetation  damage,  Feb  1985, 4

 Chemical selection  methods:   bibliography  of, July  1984,  3

 Chlordane:   Sept 1989,  7

 Chlorinated  solvents:   Sept 1988, 4; work  group examines  exposure to,
       Nov  1987,  7-8

 Chlorine:  Jan 1989, 4; July  1990, 9; listed as Extraordinarily Hazardous
       Substance  in  New  Jersey, Sept  1986,  5

 Chlorine dioxide:   verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

 Chlorobenzene:   May 1985, 6;  and California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification and  Control Process,  Dec 1984, 5; EPA  draft
       source/emission factor  report  on,  Dec 1984, 9; OAQPS  publishes new
       document on,  Dec  1986,  10; regulatory status of under Clean Air Act,
       Dec  1985,  10

 Chloroethane:  and  Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 4

 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs):   alternatives  to, May 1989, 8;  link to ozone
       studied, May  1989,  7-8; Oregon rule  reduces use of; regulatory status of
       under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10; Vermont regulation covers, July 1989,


 Chloroform:  May 1985, 6; Dec 1985,   11; Sept 1987, 12; Jan  1989, 7, 8;
      July 1989,  7, 9,  10; May 1990, 5, 8; as contributor to air toxics
      problem, Sept 1984, 2-3; and California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification and  Control  Process, Dec 1984, 5; and EPA/IEMD ambient
      monitoring program, Apr 1984,  5-6; EPA report on, July 1984, 6; Maryland
      Consent Orders to reduce, Mar 1991, 5-6;  and Michigan's use of air
      stripping of VOCs,  Dec  1985,  4; regulatory status of under Clean Air
      Act,  Dec 1985, 10

Chloroprene:   May 1985,  6; and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and  Control  Process, Dec 1984, 5; regulatory status of
      under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10

Chrome plating:  Nov 1990, 1;  covered by California air toxics rule,
      Mar 1988, 5

Chromium:   Dec 1986, 10; Sept  1987,  8;  July 1988,  2; Jan  1989, 4;  Mar 1989,
      11;  Sept 1989, 9;  Jan 1990, 7;  Mar 1990,  7;  May 1990,  5, 6;  as
      contributor to air toxics problem,  Sept 1984,  2-3;  and California Air
      Resources Contaminant Identification and  Control  Process,  Dec 1984,  5;
      May 1985, 6; EPA proposes ban  on  cooling  tower use,  May 1988,  9;  EPA
      report  on locating and estimating emissions  of,  Dec 1985,  11;  EPA
      source/emission  factor report  on,  Dec 1984,  9;  final standard for


                                     A-13

-------
Chromium  (continued):  comfort cooling towers issued, Sept 1990, 8-9; and New
      York's toxic air  contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7;
      Oklahoma limits biomedical waste incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4; as
      product of resource recovery facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9; regulatory
      status of under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10; rule proposed by California
      agency, Mar 1988, 4-5; TACB reviews sources of, Jan 1988, 3; verified
      RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Chrysenes:  and New York's toxic air contaminant stack assessment program,
      Aug 1985, 7

Clean Air Act (CAA):  Sept 1984, 9; Mar 1990, 5, 10,  11; May 1990, 7, 8, 10,
      11; draft source category list developed,  Mar 1991, 1-2; effectiveness
      of, according to House/Senate committee members, Dec 1983 (5); and EPA
      decisions on trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene, Mar 1986, 9; and
      EPA air toxics strategy, Aug 1985, 3-5; and EPA arsenic rulemaking,
      Sept 1984, 9; and benzene rulemaking,  Feb 1984, 2; and EPA prototype
      scheme for handling toxic air pollutants,  Sept  1984, 3-4; and EPA report
      assessing toxic air pollutants,  Sept 1984, 2-3; language from used in
      Louisiana regulation,  Dec 1989,  2; MACT defined under,  July 1990, 1,
      8-9; proposed rules for operating permits  program, May 1991, 1-2; and
      proposed standards on radionuclides,  Dec 1984,  7-8; reauthorization of,
      Apr 1984, 3-4; revisions to proposed,  Sept 1989, 3-4; Section 105 grants
      and co-control, Jan 1989, 4; Section 110 and NAAQS attainment, Nov 1987,
      4-5; Section 111 invoked in regulation of municipal waste combustion
      emissions, Sept 1987,  9; Section 112,  and  intent-to-list, June 1986, 1;
      Section 114 letters sent to facilities in  cancer risk update,  May 1990,
      2; Senate offer made,  Sept 1990, 1-3;  and  Six Months Study,  Apr 1984,
      4-5; and STAPPA/ALAPCO conference on air toxics, Dec 1985, 8-9; and
      STAPPA/ALAPCO policy on hazardous air  pollutants,  Feb 1985,  4-5; and
      list of toxic air pollutants and their regulatory status, Dec 1985, 10;
      U.S. House of Representatives passes,  July 1990, 1, 8-9; Wisconsin's new
      definition of "hazardous air contaminant"  augments CAA definition of,
      Sept 1986, 3-4

Cleanups, toxic:  California "decision tree" document on, Mar 1986,  6

Clean Water Act:  permitting program model  for Title  V program, May 1991, 1-2

Closed system engineering:  and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control  Process,  Dec 1984,  4

Coalition of Northeastern Governors (CONEG):  conducts woodstove study,
      Dec 1986, 8;  conducts  woodstove  study, Dec 1986, 8; prepares report on
      woodstove emissions, Jan 1988,  11

Cobalt oxide:   Chattanooga-Hamilton County permitting proceeding on,
      Jan 1988, 4-6

Co-control of pollutant emissions:  defined, Jan 1989, 3-6
                                     A-14

-------
 Coke  oven emissions:   Sept 1988,  10;  Mar 1989,  10;  May 1990,  8;  health effects
       of,  Jan  1989,  9;  Indiana rule to reduce,  May  1990,  8;  recovery plants
       and benzene,  Feb  1984,  2;  reductions  called for under  benzene rule,
       Dec 1989,  11;  regulatory status of under  Clean Air  Act,  Dec 1985,  10

 Colorado:   Denver "Brown  Cloud"  study released,  Jan 1990,  2,  11

 Combustion:  see also  Incineration; EPA air toxics  strategy  and  incomplete
       combustion,  Aug  1985,  3-5;  EPA  report on  hospital incinerators,
       Nov 1987,  5-6;  IARC study  of woodstove emissions described,  June 1987,
       10;  and  landfill  gas incinerators,  July 1990,  6-7;  of  municipal  waste,
       workshop on, Mar  1987,  8

 Combustion,  coal  and oil:   Sept  1989,  9

 Combustion,  municipal waste:   Nov 1988,  3;  Sept  1989,  9;  Air  RISC  plans
       brochures  on, May 1991,  10;  ECAO model  assesses  indirect human exposures
       to,  May  1991, 7-8;  NSPS  sets  siting requirements, Mar  1991,  8-9; OAQPS
       sets standards for,  Mar  1991, 8-9;  STAPPA/ALAPCO comment on  proposed
       regulation  for, July 1990,  7; study conducted  by CTC/NESCAUM,  June 1987,
       5;  test  protocol  for development by CTC/NESCAUM,  Mar 1988,  9

 Combustion,  residential wood-fired:   Mar  1989,  11;  Sept 1989, 5,  7;  and Denver
       "Brown Cloud" study,  Jan 1990,  11;  and  emission  of  carcinogens  from,
       May  1985,  2-3; and  IACP  field studies,  Dec 1985,  5-7;   and OAQPS
       development  of NSPS  on,  May  1985, 3-5;  Aspen,  CO, regulation on,
       June 1986,  7-8; regulation  adopted  in  Puget Sound to control  emissions
       from,  March  1990, 6;  sampling methods  for, Sept  1988,  11-12;  studied by
       IACP,  Nov  1988, 3-4

 Combustion sources:  Nov  1988, 3; National  Tier 4 dioxin  study and,
       Nov  1987, 8

 Community  Right-to-Know provisions:   under  SARA Title  III.  See SARA Title III

 Compliance,  certifications of:  Title  V program to require, May 1991,  1-2

 Compliance Data System  (CDS):  introduced by  EPA, Jan  1989, 9-10

 Comprehensive  Environmental Response,  Compensation and Liability Act  (CERCLA):
      Apr  1984, 3; July 1989,  10-11; Dec 1989, 9; and Massachusetts Toxics Use
       Reduction Act, Sept  1990, 8;  Reportable Quantity Provisions  in,
      June 1986,  3; Region 6 inspection program and, June 1986, 5

Connecticut:   air toxics control  program, Dec 1983 (7); develops MWC test
      protocol, Mar 1988,  9; regulation to control  toxic air pollutants
      described,  Sept 1986, 4-5

Consent decree:  issued in Philadelphia incinerator testing,  Sept  1986, 9
                                     A-15

-------
 Consumer  products:  OAQPS  begins  study of, Jan  1990, 8; Oregon  regulates  CfC;
       halon-containing,  Nov  1990,  7-8

 Contingency Preparedness Plans:   and EPA air toxics strategy, Aug  1985, 6

 Control of Air Toxics  (CAT):  CTC/AEERL can now use in modeling, Sept 1989, 9

 Control Programs Development Division (CPDD):  and State/local  air pollution
       control agencies,  June 1986, 9-10

 Control technology:  AEERL research on, Feb 1985, 2-3; California agency rule
       defines, Mar  1988, 3; carbon adsorption as, Dec 1985, 3;  for chrome
       plating industry, Mar 1988,  5; cost of, Dec 1985, 3; evaluated for
       Denver's "Brown  Cloud" study, Jan 1990, 2, 11; evaluating alternatives
       under NESCAUM guideline, Jan 1989, 6-7; under hazardous organic NESHAP,
       Sept 1987, 12; for hospital  incinerators, Nov 1987, 6; and indoor radon
       levels, Mar 1986, 3-5; for  landfill gas, July 1990, 5-6;  limits of New
       Jersey approach  to, July 1989, 6; STAPPA/ALAPCO finds need for
       information on,  Dec 1989, 10; workshop on, Mar 1988, 11

 Control Technology Center (CTC):  Mar 1991, 5; June 1987, 4-5; Jan 1988, 9;
       Mar 1988, 8-9; May 1989, 6-7; May 1991, 9; develops permit review
       software, May 1988, 8; described, Dec 1986, 2-3; functions of, Nov 1988,
       8;  issues air toxics reports, Dec 1989, 5-6;  new computer models
       described Sept 1989, 9; program growth described, Sept 1988,  4-5

 Cooling towers, comfort:  Jan 1989, 4j EPA proposes chromium ban in, May 1988,
       9; EPA publishes final chromium standards, Sept 1990, 8-9

 Copper:  May 1990,  5,  6

 Copper smelters, primary:  as inorganic arsenic emissions sources,
      Sept 1984, 9

Cotton gins:   as inorganic arsenic emissions sources,  Sept 1984, 9

Cresol:  May 1985,  6;  May 1990,  8; and California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification and Control  Process,  Dec 1984,  5

Criteria pollutants:   May 1991,  4; Florida seeking  information on ambient
      monitoring of, Dec 1986,  11; defined, Dec 1983 (1);  included in
      Connecticut air  toxics regulation,  Sept 1986,  4;  New Jersey bases  air
      toxics program on, July 1989, 6-7

Cumene:  verified RfC,  Nov 1990,  2

Data LOG'r™:  Dec 1986,  9

Degreasing:   Nov 1990,  1; Sept 1988,  3;  Rhode Island regulation of, Mar  1987,
      6; work group examines solvent exposure on,  Nov 1987, 7-8
                                     A-16

-------
 Delaware:   joins  air  management  association,  May  1990,  2
 Deposition  analysis:   May 1989,  6
 Dialkyl  nitrosamines:   May 1985, 6;  and  California  Air  Resources  Contaminant
       Identification  and  Control Process,  Dec 1984,  5
 Dibenzofurans:   in  city incinerator  ESP,  Sept 1986,  9;  effects  of in  Ohio
       study,  Nov  1988,  2-3;  and  hospital  incinerators,  Nov  1987,  5-6
 Dibromochloromethane:   May 1990, 5
 Dibromochloropropane:   July  1988, 8
 Dichlorobenzene,  1,4-:  July 1989, 10; verified RfC, Nov  1990,  2
 Dichlorobenzene,  o-:   May 1990,  8
 Dichlorobenzene,  p-:   May 1985,  6; AEERL  studies  indoor air  sources of,
       Mar 1991, 4-5;  and  California  Air  Resources Contaminant Identification
       and Control Process, Dec 1984,  5
 Dichlorodifluoromethane:   and Michigan's  use  of air  stripping of  VOCs,
       Dec 1985, 4
 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane  (DDT):  Mar 1990, 7
 Dichloroethane, 1,1-:   May 1990, 5;  and Michigan's use of air stripping of
       VOCs, Dec 1985,  4
 Dichloroethane, 1,2-:   See Ethylene  dichloride
 Dichloroethylene, 1,1-:   May 1990,  5
 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans-:  May 1990, 5
 Dichloromethane:  See Methylene chloride
 Dichloropropane, 1,2-:  and  EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring program, Apr  1984, 5-6
 Dichloropropene, 1,3-:  verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2
 Dieldrin:  March 1990,  7
 Diethylether:  and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs,  Dec 1985,  4
Diethylphthalate:  May  1990, 5,  6
Dimethyl amine:  verified RfC, Nov 1990,  2
Dimethylformamide:  verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

                                     A-17

-------
Dimethylphthalate:  RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

Di-N-butylphthalate:  May 1990, 5; RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

D1-N-octylphthalate:  May 1990, 5, 6

Dioxane, 1,4-:  May 1985, 6; July 1989, 7; May 1990, 8; and California Air
      Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5

Dioxins:  See also PCDDs, tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins; Sept 1987, 9; in city
      incinerator ESP, Sept 1986,  9; and combustion source study, July 1984,
      7; effects of in Ohio study, Nov 1988, 2-3; and New York's toxic air
      contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; EPA national strategy
      on, Apr 1984, 2-3; and hospital incinerators,  Nov 1987, 5-6; and
      municipal waste combustor standard, Mar 1991,  8-9; National Tier 4 study
      results, Nov 1987, 8; regulatory status of under Clean Air Act,
      Dec 1985, 10; testing for at incinerator, Sept 1986, 8-9

Diphenylthiourea (DPT), emissions of:  and damage to vegetation, Feb 1985, 4

Dispersion calculations:  used in study of emissions from chemical plant,
      Feb 1985, 4

Dispersion models:  May 1989,  6; Jan 1990, 7;  carried out in Chicago cancer
      risk assessment, Mar 1989, 10-11; evaluation of performance of,
      Apr 1984, 5; improvements suggested, Jan 1988, 8; Kentucky regulation
      requires, May 1988, 3; Philadelphia uses to predict ground level
      concentration, July 1989, 9; PIPQUIC used in executing, July 1989, 4;
      predicted ambient concentrations in Kansas, Jan 1988, 6-7; and risk
      assessment/management, Feb 1984, 2; role in Wisconsin air toxics
      program, Sept 1986, 3-4; used in Ontario, Mar  1988, 7;  used in New
      York's calculations of PCD-dioxin levels, Sept 1986, 8; used in Ohio
      sampling study,  Nov 1988, 2-3

District of Columbia:   joins air management association, May 1990, 2

Dry cleaning:  Nov 1990, 1; Sept 1988, 3; Florida regulation of facilities
      described, Mar 1987,  3;  work group examines solvent exposure in,
      Nov 1987, 7-8

Emergency response programs:  California agency's emergency response team
      described, June 1987, 2-3; and Chemical  Emergency Preparedness Program
      (CEPP), June 1986, 2-4;  commission (ERC) required by SARA Title III,-
      Dec 1986, 6; National Governors' Association report on, Sept 1987, 14;
      and SARA Title III, Dec  1986,  5-6; South Carolina agency program
      described, Sept 1987, 5

Emission factors:   compiled for air toxics by  OAQPS, Jan 1989,  14; developed
      for benzene, Jan 1990, 1; development called for by States, Jan 1988, 7;
      for fugitive emissions,  Jan 1990, 2-3; included in CARS technical
                                     A-18

-------
Emission factors (continued):  guidance manual, Mar 1990, 10; in OAQPS
      pollutant/source data base, Sept 1990,  9; new OAQPS branch focuses on,
      Jan 1991, 6

Emission inventories:  June 1986, 10; May 1989, 6; Sept 1990, 5; California
      agency's compilation of described, Mar 1987, 3; California establishes
      program for, July 1988, 5-6; conducted in Chicago cancer risk
      assessment, Mar 1989, 10; conducted in South Dakota to begin air toxics
      program development, Nov 1987, 3; conducted in urban air toxics
      programs, Sept 1987, 7; EPA compilation of, Mar 1987, 11-12; EPA surveys
      Chicago area, Nov 1987, 6-7; EPA/OAQPS publishes document on, Dec 1986,
      10; information in NATICH data, 9-10; and Massachusetts use reduction
      act, Sept 1990, 8; and NATICH data base contents, June 1986, 1-2; new
      OAQPS branch focuses on, Jan 1991, 6; prepared by Ontario, Mar 1988, 7;
      prepared under SARA Title III reporting requirements, Sept 1987, 11-12;
      procedures manual on preparation of, Mar 1986, 11; RAPCA completes for
      point sources, Jan 1989, 7-8; requirements for under California
      regulation; Mar 1990, 2; Rhode Island uses in air toxics regulatory
      decisions, Sept 1988, 2-3; TACB data on, Jan 1988, 3; TACB uses to
      predict health impacts, May 1991, 1-2; topic at STAPPA/ALAPCO
      conference, Dec 1984, 2; techniques, Feb 1984, 4; waferboard plant
      assessed by CTC, June 1987, 4-5

Emission Measurement Technical Information Center (EMTIC):  Mar 1991, 5;
      activities highlighted, Jan 1991, 7; established by EPA, Mar 1989, 7;
      and OAQPS bulletin board, Sept 1990, 10-11

Emissions estimation:  covered in CAPCOA source assessment manual, Dec 1986, 5

Emissions, fugitive:  See also Equipment leaks; and California agency rule,
      Mar 1988, 2; Chattanooga-Hamilton County study addresses 1,3-butadiene,
      May 1991; of toxic chemicals from equipment leaks, Jan 1990, 2-3

Emissions, testing:  See also Source sampling, Stack sampling; EMTIC release
      information filing system for, Jan 1991, 7

Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office (ECAO):  Mar 1991, 2; Jan 1988,
      9; develops indirect human exposure assessment method, May 1991, 7-8

Environmental effects:  SARA Section 313 data base introduced,
      Sept 1988, 13-14

Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL):  Jan 1988, 8

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):  See also entries under specific
      offices, regions; acrylonitrile sources, prototype scheme for handling,
      Sept 1984, 3; and Agency Prevention Work Group, June 1986, 4; arsenic
      Section 112 rulemaking, Sept 1984, 9; benzene storage facilities as
      benzene emission source, rulemaking on, Sept 1984, 9; carcinogens,
      airborne, IACP project identifying, Mar 1986, 7; Chemical Activity
      Status Report (EPA CASR), defined, Feb 1984, 3; develops hazardous


                                     A-19

-------
Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) (continued):   organic NESHAP, Sept 1987,
      12;  develops radon risk communication program,  Sept 1988,  6-7;
      encourages co-control  of pollutant emissions,  Jan 1989,  3-6; examines
      ozone attainment,  Nov  1987,  4-5; and hazardous  waste TSDF, Apr 1984,  5;
      hotline for, Dec 1985,  11; issues report on indoor air,  May 1988,  11;
      national  air toxics strategy section on urban  toxics, Mar  1987,  9-10;
      studies air toxics/cancer link, Nov 1988, 9;  operates risk assessment
      forum, Nov 1988, 7-8;  outlines policy approaches for benzene regulation,
      Sept 1988, 9-11; plans  regulation of municipal  waste disposal,
      Sept 1987, 8-9;  prepares indoor air quality plan for Congress,
      Sept 1987, 7-8;  prepares permit review support, Mar 1987,  11; proposes
      ban  on chromium in cooling towers, May 1988,  9; proposes Title V
      operating permits  program, May 1991, 2; report  on hospital incinerators,
      Nov  1987, 5-6;  reviews  multi-year development  plan progress, Mar 1987,
      11;  role in indoor air  quality, Mar 1989, 8-9;  strategy  to control both
      routine and accidental  releases, June 1986, 8-10; studies  ethylene oxide
      control  technology, May 1988,  9-10; technical  support for  multi-year
      development plan (MYDP), June  1986, 9; toxic  air pollutants, prototype
      scheme for handling, Sept 1984, 3-4; trichloroethvlene and
      perch!oroethylene, decisions on, Mar 1986,  9;  urban air  toxics progress
      in all regions  described, Sept 1987, 6-7

Eplchlorohydrin:  May 1985,  6; May 1990, 8; and California Air Resources
      Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984,  5; and EPA
      report on locating and  estimating emissions of, Dec 1985,  11; EPA draft
      source/emission factor  report  on, Dec 1984, 9;  regulatory  status of
      under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10; TACB reviews sources  of, Jan  1988, 3;
      verified RfC,  Nov  1990, 2

Epigenetic mechanisms:  and  drafting carcinogen policy, Dec 1983 (6)

Equipment  leaks:  Reg Neg complete for, Mar 1991, 8

Ethylbenzene:   May 1991, 9;  and EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring program, Apr 1984,
      5-6; and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 4

Ethylbenzene/styrene:   plants as benzene emissions  source (EPA rulemaking on),
      Sept 1984, 9;  process  vents and CAA rulemaking, Feb 1984,  2

Ethylene dibromide:   May 1985, 6;  July 1989, 7; May  1990, 8; and California
      Air  Resources  Contaminant Identification and  Control Process, Dec 1984,
      5; process vents,  Sept  1988, 10

Ethylene dichloride:   May 1985, 6; Dec 1985, 11; Sept 1987, 12;  July 1989,  7,
      9; May 1990, 5,  8; California  Air Resources Contaminant  Identification
      and  Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; EPA reports  on, July 1984, 6;  and
      EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring program, Apr 1984,  5-6; facility-specific
      reduction program in Puget Sound, Mar 1990, 6-7; and Michigan's  Use of
      Air Stripping of VOCs,  Dec 1985, 4; regulatory status of under Clean Air
      Act, Dec 1985,  10
                                     A-20

-------
 Ethylene  oxide:  May  1985,  6;  Sept  1987,  12;  Jan  1989,  4;  May  1990,  8;
      July  1990, 9; Nov  1990,  1;  as  contributor to  air  toxics  problem,
      Sept  1984, 2-3;  and California Air  Resources  Contaminant  Identification
      and Control  Process,  Dec 1984, 5; control devices  for  hospital  use  as
      sterilant, July  1988,  10; control devices for, May 1988,  9-10;  Nebraska
      investigates use as sterilizer,  Sept  1989,  3; NESHAP for, May  1990, 9;
      OAQPS publishes  new document on, Dec  1986,  10; regulatory status of
      under Clean  Air  Act,  Dec 1985, 10;  Santa Barbara APCD  writes new rule
      on, July  1990, 2-3

 Ethylene  glycol monobutyl ether:  verified  RfC, Nov 1990,  2

 Ethyl en inline:   July 1989, 7

 Exposure  assessment:   Sept  1990,  5;  carried out for sludge disposal  rule,
      Jan 1990, 7; conducted for  California ethylene oxide rule, July 1990,
      2-3; covered in  CAPCOA source  assessment manual, Dec 1986, 5;  ECAO
      develops  model for indirect human,  May  1991, 7-8;  EPA  risk assessment
      guidelines available on, July  1988, 11; HEM II available  for,
      May 1991, 3

 Exposure  Assessment Group (EAG):  Jan  1988, 9

 Exposure  modeling:  see Modeling, exposure

 Extractable Organic Matter (EOM):  May 1989, 5; measured in  IACP study,
      Nov 1980, 3-4

 Extraction processes:   as sources of radionuclide emissions,  Dec 1984, 7

 Fees:  Mar 1990, 2; Florida county adopts schedule for asbestos, Sept 1990,
      3-4; for permit emissions levied by State governments,  June 1987,  11;
      schedule  for required under California air toxics  regulation

Film making:  New York firm to reduce methylene chloride emissions from,
      Sept 1989, 4-5

Fish processing plants:  and Alaska ammonia standard,  Mar 1991, 1-2

Florida:   air toxics working group (FLATWG)  activities described,  Mar 1991,  4;
      agency seeking information on ambient monitoring,  Dec 1986,  11; asbestos
      NESHAP enforcement delegated,  Sept 1990, 4;  considers air toxics during
      soil cleanup, Jan 1990,  1, 10;  dry cleaning  facility regulations
      described, Mar 1987,  3; Hillsborough County  adopts asbestos  fee
      schedule, Sept 1990,  3-4

Florida Air Toxics Working  Group (FLATWG):  drafts Air Toxics Source Review
      Strategy, Mar 1991, 4
                                     A-21

-------
 Formaldehyde:   May  1985,  6;  Dec  1985,  11;  Dec  1986,  10; July  1988,  2;
       Mar  1989,  11;  July  1989, 9;  Sept  1989, 7; May  1990, 8;  Sept  1990, 8;
       and  California Air  Resources  Contaminant  Identification  and  Control
       Process,  Dec  1984,  5;  California  revises  source test method  for,
       Mar  1991;  as  contributor to  air  toxics problem, Sept 1984, 2-3; EPA
       reports on, July  1984,  6;  and New York's  toxic air contaminant stack
       assessment program, Aug 1985, 7

 Freon  113:  May  1990, 8

 Fuel,  waste-derived:  New Jersey rule on,  Apr 1984, 2

 Furans:  See also Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs),
       Tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDFs); and municipal waste combustor
       standard,  Mar  1991, 8-9

 Gasoline marketing:   EPA proposes regulation of benzene from,  Dec  1989, 11;
       EPA  rulemaking  on benzene emissions  sources, Sept 1984,  9; PSAPCA
       estimates  regulation effectiveness,  Mar 1990, 6

 Gasoline vapors:  NESCAUM report on, Dec 1989, 6-8

 Genetic toxicants:   EPA risk  assessment guidelines available on suspected,
       July 1988, 11;  new system to  evaluate introduced,  July 1989, 8-9

 Geographic studies:   PIPQUIC  developed  for, July 1989, 4

 Georgia Environmental Protection Division:  and control  of vegetation damage
       from toxic air  pollutants,  Feb 1985, 4

 Glass  manufacturing plants:   as inorganic  arsenic emissions sources,
       Sept 1984, 9

Great  Lakes Agreement:  Mar  1987, 2; Mar 1990,  7; and Indiana  regulation,
       May  1990,  1; and  Region V transboundary project, May 1989, 5-6

Ground water:  and air toxics, Jan  1990, 1, 10; report on air  strippers for,
       June 1987, 5

Halogenated solvents:  Nov 1987,  7

Halons:  Oregon  reduces use of,  Nov 1990,  7-8

Hazard Index, EPA's:  used in Chattanooga monitoring, Jan 1988, 6; used in
       Minnesota  risk  assessment,  May 1989, 3-4; used in  Rhode  Island nuisance
       regulation, Jan 1991, 1-2

Hazardous Air Pollutant Prioritization System (HAPPS):  Feb 1984, 5

Hazardous air pollutants:  See Air  pollutants,  toxic
                                     A-22

-------
 Hazardous material:   air toxics from contaminated soil,  Jan 1990,  1,  10;
       burning of for fuel, Apr 1984, 2;  emergency planning guide prepared,
       Nov 1987,  10;  and Oregon develops  training program on,  May 1990,  4,  9-10

 Hazardous organics:   May 1990, 9;  EPA develops NESHAP,  Sept 1987,  12;
       equipment  leak standards complete,  Mar 1991,  8

 Hazardous waste  disposal:   California agency's enforcement of regulations,
       June 1987,  3;  document on pathway  analyses for,  Nov 1988,  8;  and  EPA  Six
       Months Study,  Apr 1984,  4; Massachusetts air  toxics provisions  for,
       Jan 1989,  2;  Oregon  develops training program on,  May 1990,  4,  9-10;
       Texas regulations on disposal  of,  Jan 1988, 3

 Hazardous waste  treatment, storage and disposal  facilities:  see  Treatment,
       Storage, and  Disposal  Facilities (TSDF)

 Hazard Ranking System:   revised, July 1989,  7-8

 Health effects:   See also  IRIS;  as basis  for chemical-specific air  toxics
       guidelines, Dec 1983 (4-5);  and California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification and Control Process,  Dec  1984,  4; and chemicals  in the
       work place, Dec 1983 (6);  covered  in  Massachusetts  AALs, Jan  1990, 4;
       and EPA air toxics strategy, Aug 1985, 6;  of  gasoline exposure covered
       in  NESCAUM  study,  Dec  1989,  6-8; and  Massachusetts  air  toxics control
       program, Dec  1983  (7); noncancer, Sept 1988,  5-6, 8;  and NESCAUM control
       policy guideline,  Dec  1983 (6);  OAQPS  studies  noncancer, Jan  1990, 9,
       11;  SARA Section  313 data  base  introduced, Sept 1988, 13-14;
       STAPPA/ALAPCO  conducts survey  of, Nov  1987, 10; STAPPA/ALAPCO finds need
       for information on,  Dec  1989,  10; and  radon emissions from uranium in
       soil,  Mar 1986, 3; TACB  develops biological test system to monitor,
       Jan 1988, 3; TACB  to review  for  existing sources, May 1991, 1-2; and
       VOCs,  Dec 1985, 3

Health  Effects Research  Laboratory (HERL):  Jan  1988, 8,  10; develops method
       to  assess toxics genetic activity, July  1988, 8-9

Health  risks:  California  develops management  levels for  ethylene oxide rule,
      July  1990,  2;  and  cost, July 1984, 2-3;  and dioxin, Apr 1984, 2-3; OAQPS
       initiates study of noncancer, Sept 1988,  5-6

Hexachlorobenzene:   May  1990, 8

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene:   May 1985, 6;  May 1990, 8; and California Air .
      Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984,  5;
      regulatory status of under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10

Hexane:   Sept 1989,   3

Hexane, n-:  verified RfC,  Nov 1990, 2

Home Evaluation Program (HEP):   Maine participation  in,  Mar 1989, 2


                                     A-23

-------
Hospital sterilizers:  See also Ethylene oxide; EPA studies ethylene oxide
      in, May 1988, 9-10; new technology to control ethylene oxide use in,
      July 1988, 10

Hospital waste Incinerators: see Incineration, hospital waste

Hot spots:  CARB initiates information program on, July 1988, 5-6; CARB
      prepares regulation for, Mar 1990, 2, 3, 10; Nebraska performs
      dispersion modeling on, Sept 1989, 3; TACB sampling program for,
      May 1989, 3; treatment of toxic by CARB, Mar 1988, 5

Houston:  monitoring program described, May 1988,  3-4

Human Exposure Model (HEM):  Jan 1989, 8; July 1989,  8; May 1990, 2; updated
      as HEM II, May 1991, 3; used for High Risk Point Source study,
      May 1991, 9

Hydrocarbons:  and IARC evaluation of wood smoke photo-oxidation products,
      June 1986, 5; NESCAUM adopts California automobile standard to reduce,
      Mar 1990, 3, 4

Hydrochloric acid:  as product of resource recovery facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9

Hydrogen chloride:  May 1989, 9; Air RISC studies  short-term health effects
      of, Sept 1990, 10; California amends source  test methods for, Mar 1991,
      7-8; and hospital incinerators, Nov 1987, 5-6;  listed as Extraordinarily
      Hazardous Substance in New Jersey, Sept 1986, 5; Maryland Consent Orders
      to reduce, Mar 1991, 5-6; and New York's toxic  air contaminant stack
      assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; Oklahoma limits biomedical waste
      incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4; verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Hydrogen cyanide:  July 1990, 9; listed as Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance
      in New Jersey, Sept 1986, 5

Hydrogen fluoride:  July 1990, 9; California amends source test method for,
      Mar 1991, 7-8; listed as Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance in New
      Jersey, Sept 1986, 5

Hydrogen sulfide:  Jan 1989, 9; July 1990, 9; listed  as Extraordinarily
      Hazardous Substance in New Jersey, Sept 1986, 5; delisted in proposed
      Clean Air Act, May 1990, 10; verified RfC, Nov  1990, 2

Hydroquinone:  RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

Idaho:  examines sugar beet VOC emissions, May 1988,  4-5; sampling program in
      under IACP, Sept 1988, 11-12

Incineration:  dioxin/furan testing for, Sept 1986, 8-9; OAQPS publishes
      report on sewage sludge, July 1990, 9; Ohio  studies emissions from
      sewage sludge, May 1990, 5-6; and New York's toxic air contaminant stack
                                     A-24

-------
 Incineration  (continued):   assessment  program, Aug  1985,  7-8;   and  sewage
       sludge  rule,  Jan  1990,  7;   solid waste disposal options discussed,
       Sept  1986,  10;  used  for contaminated  soil  in  Florida, Jan  1990,  10

 Incineration  at sea:  and  hazardous wastes, Feb  1984, 6

 Incineration, biomedical waste:   Air RISC plans  brochure  for, May 1991, 10;
       Rhode Island  nuisance regulation includes  biomedical waste, Jan  1991,
       1-2

 Incineration, hospital waste:  Nov 1987, 5-6; May 1989, 7; corrections to
       study issued, July 1990, 8; and  CTC,  Mar 1988, 9; EPA report  on,
       Nov 1987, 5-6;  Oklahoma sets performance  criteria  for, May 1991, 4, 7;
       required by California  program to submit risk assessments, Dec 1986, 4;
       study on released, Jan  1989, 14;  Wisconsin is requiring LAER contested,
       Nov 1990, 4-5; workshop on, Mar  1988, 11;  workshop  on, Mar 1988

 Indiana:  Spotlight on Department of Environmental Management, May  1990, 1, 8

 Indoor air pollution:  See also Radon; Sept 1990, 4; and AEERL research
       approach described, Mar 1991, 4-5; AEERL plans report on products are
       sources of, Jan 1991, 4-5; AEERL prepares  handbook on sources of,
      Jan 1991, 4-5; Air RISC tackles  Virginia problem on, Jan 1991, 5; EPA
      prepares plan on,  Sept  1987, 7-8; EPA report on, May 1988, 11; EPA's
      role in controlling quality of,  Mar 1989, 8-9; HVAC system role in
      problems with, Sept 1989, 8; in-car air toxics study described,
      June 1987, 3; and Indoor Air Quality Research Act of 1985, Dec 1985,  9;
      and Indoor Air Source Emissions  Data Base  (IASE) (source
      characterization)  data base, June 1986,  11; Maine survey of radon in,
      Mar 1989,  2; and radon emissions from uranium in soil, Mar 1986,  3-5;
      RAPCA describes programs for,  Sept 1989,  7-8;  as research area for
      AEERL, Feb 1985, 2-3; sampled in IACP Boise study,  May 1988,  6; Staten
      Island/New Jersey conducts study, Sept 1990, 5-6;  topic at STAPPA/ALAPCO
      conference,  Dec 1984, 2

Industry Assistance Office:  See TSCA Assistance Office

Industry File  Index System (IFIS):  defined, Feb 1984,  3;  overview  of,
      July 1984,  4

Information Resources Management (IRM)  Managers:   listed  with their  duties,
      Sept 1989,  11

Information (computer) services:   IRM managers  listed  with their duties,
      Sept 1989,  11

Inhalation pathway:   July 1990,  7; cited  in  California  rule on carcinogens,
      Mar 1989,  6
                                     A-25

-------
Integrated Air Cancer Project  (IACP):  airborne carcinogens project, Mar  1986,
      7; Boise study described, May 1988, 4-5; description of, May  1985,  2-3;
      field studies conducted  by, Dec 1985, 5-6; Idaho sampling program,
      Sept 1988, 11-12; and project to evaluate mutagenic activity  of wood
      smoke photo-oxidation products, June 1986, 5-6; reports woodstove
      emissions measurements,  Dec 1986, 9-10; Roanoke selected as study site,
      May 1988, 5-6; Roanoke air sampling complete, Jan 1990, 7-8;  samples
      from identified by GC/MI-IR, Sept 1987, 13; studies mobile source VOC/PM
      link, May 1989, 5; studies wind flow and plume dispersion, Sept 1989,
      5-6; study of mobile sources and wood smoke mutagenicity, Nov 1988, 3-4;
      and support from AEERL,  Feb 1985, 2-3; woodstove emission study
      described, June 1987, 9

Integrated Environmental Management Division (IEMD):  ambient monitoring
      program on chlorinated organics and aromatics, Apr 1984, 5-6

Integrated Environmental Management Project (IEMP):  Jan 1989, 12;  Maryland
      completes Phase I of, Sept 1987, 3

Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS):  See IRIS

Intent-to-list:  and EPA decisions on trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene,
      Mar 1986, 9; and Section 112,  Clean Air Act,  June 1986, 1; and
      STAPPA/ALAPCO conference on air toxics, Dec 1985, 8

International  Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC):  and list of carcinogens,
      Dec 1983 (6); list of hazardous air pollutants and carcinogens compiled
      by, Sept 1986, 3-4; used in Florida air toxics standards, Mar 1991, 4;
      uses HERL genetic toxicity studies,  July 1988, 8-9

Intervention:   defined with respect  to carcinogen control,  Dec 1983 (5-6)

IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System):  Sept 1987, 14;  May 1989, 8;
      available to public,  July 1988,  10-11; described, Mar 1987,  8-9;  eight
      RfCs available, Nov 1990, 3; files to be added for SARA Section 313
      chemicals,  July 1988, 11

Kansas:   adopts air toxics strategy,  Jan 1988,  6-7; asks Air RISC styrene
      question, Jan 1991, 5;  uses Kansas Further Evaluation Level  (KFEL),
      Jan 1988, 6-7

Kentucky:  spotlight on air toxics program,  May 1988, 2-3

Kerosene heaters:   emissions  from, Mar 1989, 9

Landfills:  alternatives to,  Aug 1985, 7-8;  California agency's hazardous
      waste enforcement efforts at,  June 1987,  3;  excavation of and South
      Coast rule governing toxic emissions from,  July 1984,  1-2; emissions
      from controlled in California,  July 1990,  5-7; information on disposal
                                     A-26

-------
 Landfills  (continued):   facilities  sought,  Sept  1987,  15;  and  odor  in  Staten
       Island/New  Jersey,  Sept  1990,  5;  and  NYDEC  research  recovery  stack
       emissions assessment  program,  Sept  1986, 8

 LC^:  South Carolina uses in air toxics standards, Jan 1991, 2-3

 Lead:  May  1985, 6;  Dec  1986,  10;  Dec 1989,  3; Jan 1990,  7; May 1990, 5, 6, 8;
       Sept  1990,  4;  and California  Containment Identification  and Control
       Process, Dec  1984,  5;  Clean Air Act Amendments require municipal waste
       contributor standard  for, Mar 1991, 8-9; and  New York's  toxic air
       contaminant stack assessment  program, Aug  1985,  7; Oklahoma limits
       biomedical  waste  incinerator  emissions, May 1991,  4; ORD develops blood
       lead  distribution model, May  1991, 8; as product of  resource  recovery
       facilities, Mar 1986,  8-9;  South  Carolina uses in  air  toxics  standards,
       Jan  1991, 2-3; as tracer for  mobile source  emissions,  May 1989,  5

 Lead smelters, primary  and  secondary:   as inorganic arsenic  emissions  sources,
       Sept  1984,  9

 Leak detection and  repair (LDAR):   used in  equipment leak  regulation,
       Jan  1990, 2-3

 Letter of  intent:   See  Memorandum of Understanding

 Louisiana:  asks  Air RISC styrene question, Jan 1991,  5; implements toxics
       program, Dec  1989, 2-3; prepares  VOC  report, May 1989, 9;  and special
       study identifying toxic air pollutants, Feb  1984,  6

 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER):  Sept 1988, 13;  basis  for NESCAUM top-
       down  BACT,  Jan 1989, 6; for carcinogens in  Louisiana, Nov  1990, 4; and
       Kansas air  toxics strategy, Jan 1988, 7

 Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level  (LOAEL):  Nov 1988, 5; how  identified in
       Rhode Island  air  toxics regulation, Sept 1988, 2-3; and  RfDs,
       July  1988,  6

 Lowest Observed Effects  Level (LOEL):  Jan  1988,   5; Dec  1989,  8; used in
       noncancer risk assessment,  Jan  1990, 9, 11

 MACT:  See Maximum Achievable Control Technology  (MACT)

 Maine:   air toxics control program,   Dec 1983 (7); and  air toxics inventory,
       Sept 1984, 4;  Bureau of Health conducts wood smoke assessment, Dec 1986,
       7-8; spotlight on Maine Department of Human Services, Mar  1989,  2; State
       agency studies radon in air and groundwater, June 1987,  7-8

Major  sources:  see also Point sources;  Stationary sources; Mar  1990,  5;
      defined by proposed revised Section 112,  Sept 1989, 3-4

Malathion:  RfC non-verifiable, Nov   1990,  3
                                     A-27

-------
Maleic anhydride plants as benzene emissions source:  May 1985, 6; EPA
      rulemaking on, Sept 1984, 9; and California Air Resources Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; and CAA rulemaking on process vents,
      Feb 1984, 2

Manganese:  May 1985, 6; and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; and EPA report on
      locating and estimating emissions of, Dec 1985, 11; EPA draft
      source/emission factor report on, Dec 1984, 9; and New York's toxic air
      contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; regulatory status of
      under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10; verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Maryland:  adopts comprehensive regulations for toxic air pollutants,
      Jan 1989, 10-12; assesses air toxics reductions, Mar 1991, 5-6; calls
      Air RISC on nickel risk assessment, Jan 1991, 5; industry prepared for
      MACT, Mar 1991, 5-6; joins air management association, May 1990, 2; SARA
      Title III data on industries in, Nov 1988, 6; spotlight on Department of
      the Environment, Sept 1987, 3-4; studies radon risk communication,
      Sept 1988, 6-7

Massachusetts, Commonwealth of:  Sept 1984, 5; and air toxics control program,
      Dec 1983 (4-5, 7); promotes toxic use reduction, Sept 1990, 7-8; sets
      AALs for toxics, Jan 1990, 4; spotlight on air toxics monitoring,
      Jan 1989, 2-3

Material safety data sheets (MSDS):  Jan 1989, 7

Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT):  May 1990, 10; July 1990,  1,
      8-9; defined under proposed Clean Air Act amendments, Mar 1990, 10, 11;
      required under Indiana regulation, May 1990, 8; Senate offer and,
      Sept 1990, 2; operating permits used to determine, May 1991, 1-2

Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MIR):  May 1990, 1

Media relations:  used in incinerator dioxin testing program, Sept 1986, 8-9

Medical, research, and training facilities:  as sources of radionuclide
      emissions, Dec 1984, 7

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU):  and EPA prototype scieme for handling
      toxic air pollutants, Sept 1984, 3; and State/local option to evaluate
      acrylonitrile, Dec 1984, 9

Mercuric chloride:  RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

Mercury:  May 1985, 6; Sept 1987, 9; Mar 1990, 7; May 1990, 8; July 1990, 7;
      and California Air Resources Contaminant Identification and Control
      Process, Dec 1984, 5; Clean Air Act Amendments require municipal waste
      combustor standard for, Mar 1991, 8-9; and New York's toxic air
                                     A-28

-------
 Mercury (continued):   contaminant stack assessment program,  Aug 1985,  7;
       Oklahoma limits biomedical  waste incinerator emissions,  May 1991,  4;  as
       product of resource recovery facilities,  Mar 1986,  8-9;  verified RfC,
       Nov 1990,  2

 Metals:   California drafts source test method  for multiple,  Mar 1991,  7-8;
       emitted by resource recovery facilities,  Mar 1986,  8-9

 Methane:   as  emission from residential  wood  combustion  devices,  May  1985, 4-5

 Methyl  bromide:   May  1985,  6;  and California Air  Resources Contaminant
       Identification  and  Control  Process,  Dec  1984,  5

 Methyl  chloroform:   See also Trichloroethane,  1,1,1-; May 1985,  6; May 1990,
       8;  and  California Air Resources  Contaminant Identification and Control
       Process, Dec  1984,  5; regulatory  status  of  under  Clean Air Act,
       Dec 1985,  10

 Methylene chloride:   May  1985,  6;  Sept  1987, 12;  Sept 1988,  3;  Jan 1989, 7, 8;
       May 1989,  9;  July 1989,  9;  May 1990, 5-6, 8; July 1990,  7,  9; and
       California Air  Resources  Contaminant Identification and  Control  Process,
       Dec 1984,  5;  and EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring program,  Apr  1984,  5-6; and
       Michigan's use  of air stripping of VOCs,  Dec 1985,  4;  New  York moves to
       reduce  emissions of,  Sept 1989, 4-5; regulatory status of  under  Clean
       Air Act, Dec  1985,  10; verified RfC, Nov  1990, 2

 Methyl ethyl  ketone:  May  1990, 5

 Methyl  isocyanate:  July  1990,  9;  listed as  Extraordinarily  Hazardous
       Substance  in  New Jersey,  Sept 1986, 5

 Michigan:  Feb 1984,  4; air toxics control program, Dec 1983 (4); asks Air
       RISC styrene  question, Jan  1991, 5; Michigan Air  Pollution  Control
       Commission  studies air stripping of volatile organic compounds,
       Dec  1985,  2-3;  Wayne County  establishes health-based toxics information
       system, May 1990, 6-7

 Mid-Atlantic  Regional Air Management Association  (MARAMA):  formed,
      May  1990,  2

 Mineral fibers:  California investigates source test method for, Mar 1991,  7-8

 Mining:   cyanide destruction and Alaska ammonia standard,  Mar 1991, 1-2  •

 Minnesota:  Air  RISC  reviews risk assessment for,  May 1989,  3-4

Mississippi:   announces air toxics permit review program,  Dec 1986, 5

Mobile sources:  and air pollution/cancer report,  Apr 1984,  6;  Denver's
      inspection and maintenance program,  Jan 1990, 11;  and EPA Six Months
      Study,  Apr 1984, 5;  and  emission of carcinogens from,  May 1985,  2-3;  and


                                     A-29

-------
Mobile sources  (continued):   IACP project  identifying airborne carcinogens,
      Mar  1986, 7; and  IACP field studies, Dec 1985, 5-6;  IACP studies tracers
      for  PM emissions  from,  May 1989, 5;  mutagenicity of  emissions of,
      Nov  1988, 3-4; new regulations for,  Dec 1985, 8; Region VI  includes  in
      comparative risk, Sept  1990, 5

Modacryllc fibers:  and EPA prototype scheme for handling, Sept 1984, 3

Modeling:  California agency's use of in compiling emissions inventory,
      June 1987, 3; CTC/AEERL install new  equipment for, Sept 1989, 9;
      examples  of, Feb  1984,  4;  ISCST used in Virginia regulation, Dec 1989,
      4; of mobile source emissions, May 1989, 5; and New  York's  toxic air
      contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; numerical, Apr 1984,
      2; performed at incinerator, Sept 1986, 9; Puget Sound rule requires in
      impacts analysis, Nov 1990, 1; receptor and IACP project identifying
      airborne  carcinogens, Mar 1986, 7; TACB predicts ambient impacts with,
      May  1991, 1-2; workshop on, Mar 1988, 11

Modeling, exposure:  Human Exposure Model  II released,  May 1991,   3; indirect
      human exposures to municipal waste combustion, May 1991,  7-8; ORD
      develops  bl.ood lead distribution,  May 1991, 3; used  to detect
      halogenated solvents, Nov 1987, 7-8

Monitoring, air toxics:  May  1988, 3-4;  May 1989, 2-3;  Sept 1990,  5;
      California agency's programs for ambient air,  June 1987,  3;  and
      Connecticut air toxics regulation, Sept 1986,  5;  considerations of,
      Dec 1983  (6); EPA guidance on applying data quality objectives process,
      Dec 1989, 5; Houston program described, Mar 1988,  10; Indoor Air Source
      Emissions Data Base update, June 1986, 11;  Louisiana uses to prepare VOC
      report, May 1989, 9; Massachusetts program for, Jan  1989, 2-3; program
      conducted by EPA, Apr 1984, 5; program for urban air toxics  described,
      Sept 1987, 7; PSAPCA uses aerosol  sampling protocol   in,  Dec  1989, 4; for
      RCRA VOC/risk assessment program,  Sept 1987,  5-6;  study of,  Sept 1984,
      2; used in study of emissions from chemical plant,  Feb 1985, 4; and New
      Hampshire's air toxics control program, Dec 1983 (7); and New Jersey's
      air toxics control program, Dec 1983 (7-8); in Staten Island/New Jersey
      project,  Sept 1990,  5-6; TACB programs to assess  toxics,  Jan 1988,  3;
      Title V program to require data,  May 1991,  1-2; topic at  STAPPA/ALAPCO
      conference,  Dec 1984, 2; and Toxic Air Monitoring  System  (TAMS),
      May 1985, 7; used in Dayton,  Ohio,  PM network, Mar 1988,  8

Monitoring, continuous emissions:  required for CO from  Oklahoma  biomedical
      waste incinerators,  May 1991,  4

Montreal  Protocol  on Substances that Deplete the Ozone  Layer:   May 1989,  7;
      Nov 1990, 7

Most Appropriate Occupational  Level  (MAOL):  and  Massachusetts'  air toxics
      control program,  Sept 1984, 5; and NESCAUM regional  air toxics strategy
      for perchloroethylene, Dec 1985,  6-7
                                     A-30

-------
 Multipathway analysis:  cited in California rule on carcinogens,  Mar 1989,  6;
       Santa Barbara risk assessment models accommodates,  Nov 1990,  8-9

 Multi-year development plan (MYDP):  and EPA air toxics strategy,  June 1986,
       8-9; and EPA urban air toxics programs,  Sept 1987,  7;  for Philadelphia,
       July 1989,  9; progress reviewed,  Mar 1987, 11;  summary of development,
       Sept 1987,  13-14

 Municipal  waste combustion:  see Combustion,  municipal  waste

 Municipal  waste disposal:   see Solid waste disposal

 Mutagens:   EPA risk assessment guidelines available on, July 1988,  11;  and
       IACP evaluation of wood smoke photo-oxidation products,  June  1986,  5-6;
       IACP study  of,  Nov 1988,  3-4

 NAAQS:   See National  Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

 NATICH:  See National  Air  Toxics Information  Clearinghouse  (NATICH)

 NATICH data base:   Aug 1985,  1-2; Mar 1986,  2-3;  June 1986,  1-2; Nov  1987,  2;
      May  1989,  1-2;   May  1990,  1,  3-4;  July  1990,  3-6; agency contacts to
      trade releases  under SARA,  May 1988,  1-2;  capabilities of, Mar  1986,  2;
      changes in  programs  and log on procedures,  June 1987,  1-2; contents of,
      May  1985,  1-2;  fees  for use of, Dec 1985,  2;  function  of Newsletter in,
      Dec  1983  (2); final  development plan  for;  Dec  1983  (2);  how to  access,
      Feb  1985,  1-2;  inception  of,  Dec  1983  (1);  information dissemination
      tools,  Dec  1983  (2);  material  covered  in,  Dec  1985, 1; menu selections
      explained,  July  1989,  1-2;  new password procedures  for,  Sept 1989, 1-2;
      on-line data  entry and  editing systems  initiated, Dec  1986, 1-2; permit
      records in, June 1986,  2;  reasons  for accessing on-line,  Sept 1987, 1-2;
      risk  analysis results  incorporated  into, Nov  1988,  1-2;  security system
      for,  Sept 1986,  1; State  and  local  agency  participation  in, July 1988,
      1; TRIS access through  Dec  1989,  1-2; using  passwords for, Mar  1989,  1;
      who can use,  Dec 1985,  1

NATICH reports:  Sept  1986,  2;  carcinogen risk assessment is topic of,
      Mar  1987, 1;  how to  obtain, Dec 1985, 2; list of current, Sept  1987, 2;
      ordering procedures  for, Mar  1986,  3; price  list for,  Nov 1987, 2;
      purposes of,  Dec  1983  (1); recent distributions and prices, Sept 1989,
      2; "report card"  grade  for, Dec 1989, 2; 1990 reports  announced,
      Mar 1991, 3;  risk  communication report to be published, Mar 1988, 2; and
      State/local air  agency  needs,   Dec 1983 (2); State/local air toxics
      agency  activities, Dec  1984,  1; titles prepared for, Sept 1986, 1-2

National  Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP):   Jan 1988,  3; issues
      report on anthropogenic emissions, May 1989, 9-10

National  Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse (NATICH):   announces  working
      group members, Nov 1987, 1-2;  charter adopted by Working Group,  Dec 1983
      (1-2); re-evaluated in light of Clean Air Act Amendments, Mar 1991,  3;


                                     A-31

-------
National Air Toxics Information Clearinghouse (NATICH) (continued):  "report
      card" results described, Sept 1987, 1-2; staff duties highlighted,
      Jan 1989, 2; Working Group meets to review activities and plan future,
      Sept 1986, 1

National A1r Toxics Strategy:  Aug 1985, 3-5, 5-7; Dec 1985, 11; Dec 1986, 2;
      Jan 1989, 3-4; July 1989, 4; Mar 1990, 5

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS):   and NESCAUM automobile
      emission standards, Mar 1990, 3, 4; for lead used in sludge disposal
      rule, Jan 1990, 7; TSP and 1987 revision to, Jan 1989, 4-5; U.S.
      attainment of, Nov 1987, 4; used in Rhode Island nuisance evaluation,
      Jan 1991, 1-2

National Contingency Plan, The:  June 1986,  3; and EPA air toxics strategy,
      Aug 1985, 5

National Dioxin Strategy (EPA):  Apr 1984, 2-3

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP):  Nov 1988,
      9; Mar 1990, 5; approaches for benzene outlined, Sept 1988, 9-11; for
      beryllium used in sludge disposal rule, Jan 1990, 7; asbestos inspection
      program, Mar 1987, 10-11; enforcement  and EPA air toxics strategy,
      Aug 1985, 3-5; enforcement of standards on asbestos in California,
      June 1987, 3; and EPA air toxics strategy, June 1986, 9; EPA report on,
      Sept 1984, 3; for hazardous air pollutants, Jan 1989, 4; hazardous
      organic NESHAP under development, Sept 1987, 12; proposed for commercial
      and hospital sterilizers, May 1988, 9-10

National Emissions Data System (NEDS):  See  also Aerometric Information
      Retrieval System (AIRS); Jan 1989, 9;  used in Chicago emissions
      inventory, Nov 1987, 6-7; used in draft source category list
      development, Mar 1991, 1-2; used by IACP,  May 1988, 5-6

National Governors' Association (NGA):  Jan  1988, 7-8

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure
      Limits (NIOSH RELs):  used in South Carolina air toxics limits,
      Jan 1991, 2-3

National Response Team (NRT), The:  and EPA  air toxics strategy, Aug 1985, 5;
      Regional Response Team, June 1986, 3

National Toxicology Program (NTP):  carcinogens  and hazardous air pollutants
      identified by, Sept 1986, 3-4; used in Florida air toxics standards,
      Mar 1991, 4

Natural  Resources Defense Council (NRDC):  analyzes Maryland SARA Title III
      data, Nov 1988, 6

Nebraska:  spotlight on Nebraska Air Quality Division, Sept 1989, 2-3


                                     A-32

-------
 NESCAUM:   See  Northeast States  for  Coordinated  Air  Use  Management

 NESHAP:   See National  Emission  Standards  for  Hazardous  Air  Pollutants  (NESHAP)

 New Hampshire:   air  toxics  control  program, Dec 1983  (7)

 New Jersey:  July  1989,  6-7;  air  toxics control  program,  Dec  1983 (7-8);
       conducts  joint air toxics study, Sept 1990, 5-6;  EPA  support  activities
       of,  July  1988,  8;  joins air management  association, May 1990,  2;  passes
       first chemical  accident prevention  legislation, Sept  1986,  5-6;  proposes
       rule to cover  accidental  releases,  Mar  1988,  6-7; and waste oil  as  fuel
       regulation,  Apr 1984, 2

 New Mexico:  defines  BACT to  be technology-based, Jan 1991, 3-4;  sets  air
       toxics regulations, Jan 1991,  3-4

 New Source Performance  Standards  (NSPS):   set for municipal waste combustors,
       Mar  1991,  8-9;  for sewage sludge incineration, Jan  1990, 7

 New Source Review  (NSR):  July  1988,  2; Mar 1990, 6; FLATWG improves procedure
       for, Mar  1991,  4;  nonattainment permit  requirements for, Jan  1989,  5;
       for  North  Carolina, Mar 1990,  2; Philadelphia air toxics program,
       July 1989, 9;  Texas Air Control Board program, Jan  1988, 2-4

 New York:  air  toxics control program, Dec 1983  (4, 8), Feb 1984, 4; conducts
       joint air  toxics  study, Sept  1990,  5-6; moves to reduce methylene
       chloride  emissions, Sept  1989, 4-5; NYDEC's resource recovery stack
       emissions  assessment program,  Sept  1986,  7-8; NYSERDA conducts woodstove
       study, Dec 1986, 8; NYSERDA prepares report on woodstove emissions,
       Jan  1988,  11; prepares  report  on woodstove smoke emissions, Jan  1988,
       11;  studies  radon  risk  communication, Sept 1988, 6-7; and toxic air
       contaminant  stack  assessment  program, Aug  1985, 7-8

NEWMOA:  See Northeast Waste  Management Officials' Association

Nickel:  May 1985, 6; Dec 1985,  11;  July  1989,  10; May 1990, 5-6; Air RISC and
      Maryland risk assessment  approach for,  Jan 1991, 5;  as contributor to
       air  toxics problem, Sept  1984, 2-3;  and California Air Resources
      Contaminant  Identification and Control  Process, Dec 1984, 5; EPA reports
      on, July 1984,  6;  and New York's toxic air contaminant stack assessment
      program,  Aug 1985, 7; Oklahoma limits biomedical waste incinerator
       emissions, May 1991, 4;  regulatory  status of under Clean Air Act,
      Dec  1985,  10

Nickel refinery dust:  Maryland, Air RISC and risk assessment for, Jan 1991,  5

Nitrile rubber:  and  EPA prototype scheme  for handling,  Sept 1984, 3

Nitrobenzene:   May 1985, 6; and  California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification  and Control Process,  Dec  1984,  5;  verified RfC,
      Nov  1990,  2


                                     A-33

-------
Nitrosamines:  and Wisconsin's air toxics program, Sept  1986, 3

Nitrosomorpholine:  May  1985, 6; and California Air Resources Contaminant
       Identification  and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5

Nitrogen oxides  (N0x):  Jan 1988, 3;  Sept 1990,  4; as emissions from
       residential wood combustion devices, May 1985, 4-5; and IACP evaluation
       of wood stove photo-oxidation products, June 1986, 5-6; levels in
       landfill gas incineration, July 1990, 6; controlled in municipal waste
       combustor  standard, Mar 1991, 8-9; and New York's toxic air contaminant
       stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; Oklahoma limits biomedical waste
       incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4; as product of resource recovery
       facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9; selective catalytic reduction and Alaska
       ammonia standard, Mar 1991, 1-2

N-Nitrosod1phenylamine:  July 1989, 10

NoncrUeria pollutants:  See Air pollutants, toxic

Nonmethane Organic Compounds Program (NMOC):  Sept 1990, 5

No Observed Adverse Effect Level  (NOAEL):  compared to new method to estimate
       noncancer  risk, Jan 1990, 5-6;  defined for Alaska ammonia standard,
       Mar 1991,  1-2; examined in California ethylene oxide rule, July 1990, 2;
       how identified in Rhode Island  air toxics regulation,  Sept 1988, 2-3;
       and RfDs, July 1988,  6

No Observable Effects Level (NOEL):  Jan 1988, 5;  Nov 1988,  5; used in
       regulating air toxics, Mar 1987, 4

North Carolina:  Jan 1989,  9;  adopts  new air toxics regulations, Mar 1990, 1,
       2; joins air management association,  May 1990,  2; pollution prevention
      program in, Sept 1989, 6-7; reviews list of toxic air pollutants for
      regulation, Mar 1987, 4

Northeast States for Coordinated Air  Use Management (NESCAUM):  Jan 1988, 7;
      adopts BACT guideline, Jan 1989, 6-7;  develops MWC test protocol  with
      CTC,  Mar 1988,  9;  issues report on gasoline reports,  Dec 1989,  6-8; and
      move to certify resource recovery facility operators,  Mar 1986,  8-9; and
      noncriteria pollutant control  policy guideline,  Dec 1983 (6);
      perchloroethylene health evaluation document and,, Sept 1986,  11;
      publishes newsletter, Nov 1987,  9; pursues California  auto standards,
      Mar 1990, 3, 4; regional air toxics strategy for perchloroethylene,
      Dec 1985, 6-7;  resource recovery workshop  coordinated  by,  Sept  1986, 10;
      sponsors municipal  waste combustion workshop, Mar 1987, 8; sponsors
      training course to prevent  accidental  releases,  Mar 1987,  5;  studies
      municipal waste combustion, June 1987,  5;  and waste oil combustion
      presentation,  Sept 1984, 8

Northeast Waste Management  Officials'  Association  (NEWMOA):   provides
      pollution prevention  technical  assistance,  Nov 1990,  5


                                     A-34

-------
NSPS:  See New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)

Nuclear power reactors:  as sources of radionuclide emissions, Dec 1984, 7

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limits
      (OSHA PELs):  used in Florida air toxics standards, Mar 1991, 4; used in
      South Carolina air toxics standards, Jan 1991, 2-3

Office of Air and Radiation (OAR):  and TSDF regulations, Apr 1984, 5;
      institutes air toxics control technology center, Dec 1986, 2-3

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS):  July 1988, 7-8;
      July 1989, 8; ambient monitoring program on chlorinated organics and
      aromatics, Apr 1984, 5-6; begins study of consumer products, Jan 1990,
      8; compiles air toxics emission factors, Jan 1989, 14; conducts
      noncancer risk assessment, Jan 1990, 9; conducts screening study to
      monitor toxic air pollutants, Dec 1986, 10; cosponsors air toxics
      workshop, Dec 1986, 2; develops NSPS on residential wood fired
      combustion, May 1985, 3-5; documents air pathway analyses, Nov 1988, 8;
      establishes emission measurement center, Mar 1989, 7; evaluates
      noncancer health base, July 1989, 2; forms new emission factors and
      inventories branch, Jan 1991, 6; introduces bulletin board for models
      and test methods, Sept 1990, 10-11; issues directive on VOC control,
      Dec 1989, 9; issues documents on urban soup, cancer risk, Sept 1989, 10;
      issues reports on emissions estimates, urban air toxics, Sept 1989,
      9-10; performs cancer risk assessment for incinerator, Sept 1986, 9;
      prepares standards for hazardous waste TSDF, July 1989, 9-10; produces
      wood smoke public service announcements, Nov 1990, 9; publishes air
      toxics program manual, Sept 1990, 9; publishes benzene report, May 1988,
      10-11; publishes butadiene report, Jan 1990, 1; publishes comfort
      cooling tower standards, Sept 1990, 8-9; publishes sewage sludge
      incinerator report, July 1990, 9; publishes toxic air emission report,
      Mar 1990, 11; publishes urban air toxics report, Jan 1989, 14; releases
      air toxics data base, Sept 1990, 9; publishes PCBs, POM sources
      documents, Nov 1987, 8-9; releases natural dioxin study results,
      Nov 1987, 8; report on toxic air pollutants, sources, Jan 1988, 10-11;
      revises air pathway analysis guide, Jan 1991, 2; revises air speciation
      manual, Mar 1990, 9; sets municipal waste combustor standards, Mar 1991,
      8-9; updates Human Exposure Model, May 1991, 3; uses "Reg Neg" to
      control equipment leaks, Jan 1990, 2-3; works with OTS on SARA 313 data,
      May 1988, 8

Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR):  issues directive on VOC
      Control, Dec 1989, 9

Office of Health and Environmental Assessment (OHEA):  Jan 1988, 8

Office of Mobile Sources (QMS):  Sept 1990, 5

Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (OPPE):  develops PIPQUIC,
      July 1989, 4-6


                                     A-35

-------
Office of Research and Development  (ORD):  Center for Environmental Research
      Information introduces pollution board system, Mar 1991, 4-5; conducts
      indoor air pollution research, Mar 1991, 4-5; develops blood lead
      distribution model, May 1991, 8; institutes Air Toxics Control
      Technology Center, Dec 1986,  2-3; organization and air toxics
      responsibilities defined, Jan 1988, 8-10

Office of Solid Waste (OSW):  and TSDF regulations, Apr 1984, 5

Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER):  evaluates hazardous
      waste site air releases, July 1989, 8; and National  Dioxin Strategy,
      Apr 1984, 3

Office of Toxic Substances (OTS):   July 1988, 7-8; completes emissions
      inventories, Sept 1987, 11-12; computes SARA data quality audits,
      Sept 1990, 7; conducts Section 313 surveys, Jan 1989, 12-13; works with
      OAQPS on SARA 313 data, May 1988, 8

Office of Water (OW):  Mar 1991, 10; and National Dioxin Strategy, Apr 1984, 3

Ohio:  See also Regional Air Pollution Control Agency (RAPCA); radon levels in
      dwellings measured, Sept 1986, 6-7; RAPCA compiles PM network data,
      Mar 1988, 7-8;  RAPCA tests for radon in, Mar 1989, 3-4; spotlight on Air
      Quality Development Authority, Nov 1988, 2-3; spotlight on Division of
      Air Pollution Control, Mar 1987, 2; studies air toxics relation to Lake
      Erie pollution, Mar 1990, 7-8; studies emissions from sludge
      incinerators, May 1990, 5-6

Oklahoma:  sets performance criteria for biomedical waste  incinerators,
      May 1991, 4, 7

Ontario, Canada:  initiates air toxics assessment, Mar 1988, 7

Operation and maintenance conditions:   and California Air  Resources
      Contaminant Identification and Control  Process, Dec  1984,  4

Oregon:   develops training program,  May 1990, 4,  9-10; limits consumer use of
      CFCs,  halons, Nov 1990, 7-8; ranks risk of wood combustion, July 1988, 2

Organic compounds:  as emission from residential  wood combustion devices,
      May 1985, 3-5;  emission limits for proposed municipal waste combustion
      regulation, July 1990, 7; measured by Toxic Air Monitoring System
      (TAMS), Apr 1984,  7; as products of resource recovery facilities,
      Mar 1986, 8-9;  regulatory status of under Clean Air  Act, Dec 1985,  10

Organic gases,  toxic:  audit cylinders for, Aug 1985, 8

Ozone (03):   Sept 1990,  4;  attainment  policy  for,  Nov 1987,  4-5;  control  of
      air strippers in nonattainment areas, Dec 1989, 9; and EPA air toxics
      strategy, Aug 1985, 3; and enhancement of air toxics program, Jan 1989,
      5; and IACP evaluation of wood stove photo-oxidation products,


                                     A-36

-------
Ozone  (0,) (continued):  June 1986, 5-6; link to CFCs studied, May 1989, 7-8;
       and  NESCAUM  automobile  emission  standards, Mar  1990,  3,  4; Oregon  limits
       CFCs,  halon  use  to address  depletion of, Nov  1990,  7-8

PAH:   See  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

Paint  spraying:  Air RISC  reviews  risk assessment of, May 1989, 3-4

Particulate  matter (PM):   Dec 1986, 8;  Nov 1987, 6; Nov 1988,  9; Jan  1989, 4;
       Jan  1990,  10; Mar 1990, 9;  July  1990, 7; Sept 1990,  4; and Colorado laws
       governing  restaurants and street sanding, June  1986,  8;  and Harvard
       School of  Public Health project,  May 1985, 7; and IACP project
       identifying  airborne carcinogens, Mar 1986, 7;  in indoor air and uranium
       decay, Mar 1986, 3;  limited  by wood heater NSPS, Dec  1986, 7; measured
       in IACP study, Nov 1988, 3-4; and municipal waste combustor metals
       standard,  Mar 1991,  8-9; and New York's toxic air contaminant stack
       assessment program, Aug 1985, 7;  Oklahoma limits biomedical waste
       incinerator  emissions, May  1991,  4; Ohio agency compiles network data
       on,  Mar 1988, 7-8; relation  to fuel switching in "Brown Cloud"  study,
       Jan  1990,  2,  11; from residential wood combustion (OAQPS development of
       RWC  NSPS to  control), May 1985,  3-5; sampling of in Alaska, Nov 1987,
       3-4; TSDF  report covers emissions of, Dec 1986, 11; Vermont regulates
       air  toxics under, July 1989, 3-4; VOCs as tracers of, May 1989, 5

Particulate matter speciation:  EPA/OAQPS report on, Nov  1987, 9; species
       manual available, Nov 1988,  9-10

PCBs:  See Polychlorinated biphenyls

PCODs:  See Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins

PCDFs:  See Polychlorinated dibenzofurans

Pennsylvania:  local agency regulation to control  waste-derived liquid fuels,
       Dec  1986, 3; Allegheny County and State join air management association,
       May  1990, 2

Pentachlorophenol  (PCP):   emission information requested,  Apr 1984,  8

Perchloroethylene:  May 1985,  6;  Sept  1987,  12;  Sept 1988, 3;  July 1989,  9;
       Sept 1989,  9; May 1990,  8;  AEERL studies indoor air sources of,
      Mar  1991, 4-5; as contributor to air toxics  problem, Sept 1984,  2-3;  and
      California Air Resources Contaminant Identification  and Control  Process,
      Dec  1984, 5; EPA decision  on, Mar 1986,  9;  and EPA/IEMD ambient
      monitoring program,  Apr 1984, 5-6; NESCAUM health document on,
      Sept 1986,  11; and  NESCAUM regional  strategy to control,  Dec 1985,  6-7;
      regulated by Florida  dry cleaning facility regulation, Mar 1987, 3;
      regulatory status of  under Clean Air Act,  Dec  1985,  10

Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs):  developed by  California for air  toxics
      rule, Mar 1988,  3


                                     A-37

-------
Permits,  building:   and Aspen, Colorado, regulation on woodburninq,
      June  1986, 8

Permits,  operating:  Title V program for described, May 1991, 1-2

Permitting:  California proposed rule on, June 1987, 2-3; California rule
      covers carcinogens and, Mar  1989, 5-7; CAPCOA source assessment manual
      designed to assist, Dec 1986, 4-5; for chemical company emitting cobalt
      oxide, Jan 1988, 4-6; and Connecticut's air toxics control regulation,
      Sept  1986, 4-5; and CTC, Mar 1988, 9; CTC/NJDEP develop software for,
      May 1988, 8; Florida couples air review with contaminated soil,
      Jan 1990, 1, 10; Houston monitoring program and, May 1988, 3-4; and
      Indiana's air  toxics program, May 1990, 8; information in NATICH data
      base, July 1989, 1; Maryland process described, Sept 1987, 3-4; and
      Monterey Bay (CA) agency rule, Mar 1988, 2; new Mississippi program on,
      Dec 1986, 5; Nebraska regulations on, Sept 1989, 2-3; NESCAUM adopts
      BACT  guideline to promote consistency in, Jan 1989, 6-7; and New
      York/Michigan's air toxics control programs, Feb 1984, 4; report on
      agency fees for, June 1987,  11; requirements under new North Carolina
      air regulations, Mar 1990, 2; Rhode Island air toxics regulation and,
      Sept  1988, 3; TACB policies on, Jan 1988, 2-3; workshop on, Mar 1988, 11

Pesticides:  May 1989, 6; Sept 1989, 7; CTC/Florida evaluate emissions from
      burning of plastic containers for, Sept 1988, 4; dioxin contamination
      of, Apr 1984, 3; TACB establishes monitoring network for, May 1989, 2-3

Petroleum refineries:  benzene fugitive emissions from, Feb 1984, 2

Pharmaceuticals manufacturing:  EPA proposes regulation of benzene from,
      Dec 1989, 9; and odor in Staten Island/New Jersey,  Sept 1990, 5

Phenol:    May 1985, 6; May 1990,  8;  and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; regulatory status of
      under Clean Air Act,  Dec 1985, 10; RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990,  3

Philadelphia, City of:  July 1989,  8-9; air toxics control  program, Dec 1983
      (4);  testing for dioxins at incinerator, Sept 1986,  8-9; joins air
      management association,  May 1990, 2

Phosgene:  May 1985,  6; Sept 1988,  4; July 1990,  9; and California Air
      Resources Contaminant Identification and Control  Process,  Dec 1984, 5;
      EPA report on locating and estimating emissions of,  Dec 1985, 11;  EPA
      draft source/emission factor report on,  Dec 1984, 9;  listed as
      Extraordinarily Hazardous  Substance in New Jersey,  Sept 1986, 5;  RfC
      non-verifiable, Nov 1990,  3

Phosphorus  plants, elemental:   as sources of radionuclide emissions,
      Dec 1984, 7

Phosphorus trichloride:  listed  as  Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance in New
      Jersey, Sept 1986,  5


                                     A-38

-------
 Point  sources:   see  also  Major  sources;  Stationary  sources;  Jan  1989, 4;  and
       cancer  risk, Jan  1989,  4;  Chattanooga-Hamilton County studies  high risk,
       May  1991,  8-9; data base  cross-references with toxic air pollutants,
       Sept  1990,  9;  OAQPS document on estimating emissions from,  Sept  1989,
       9-10; OAQPS publishes emission report on, Mar 1990, 11; programs for
       high  risk,  May 1989, 3; RAPCA emission  inventory of, Jan 1989, 7-8;  and
       STAPPA/ALAPCO  policy on hazardous  air pollutants, Feb 1985, 4-5

 Pollution prevention:   Massachusetts offers technical assistance  on,
       Sept  1990,  8;  and Massachusetts survey  of toxics use, Sept  1990, 8;  and
       Massachusetts  Toxic Use Reduction  Act,  Sept 1990, 7-8; NEWMOA  provides
       technical  assistance, Nov  1990, 5; North Carolina program described,
       Sept  1989,  6-7

 Polychlorinated  biphenyls (PCBs):  May 1985,  6; Mar 1990, 8; May  1990, 8; and
       California  Air Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process,
       Dec 1984,  5; EPA/OAQPS reports on, Nov  1987,  8-9; excluded  in  past from
       sludge  incineration rule,  Jan 1990, 7;  and New York's toxic air
       contaminant stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7

 Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins  (PCDDs):  See  also Dioxins, Tetrachlorodibenzo-
       p-dioxins  (TCDDs);  May 1985, 6; Sept 1987, 8; Mar 1990,  8;  and
       California  Air Resources Contaminant  Identification and Control
       Process, Dec 1984,  5; and  New York resource recovery stack  emissions
       assessment  program,  Sept 1986, 7-8; and New York's toxic air contaminant
       stack assessment  program, Aug 1985, 7

 Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs):   See also furans,
      tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDFs); Mar 1990,  8

 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  (PAH):   May 1985,  6; Sept 1987,  9; Dec 1989,
      3; Mar  1990, 8; and  California Air Resources  Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; covered in  Ontario air toxics
      assessment, Mar 1988, 7; and New York's toxic air contaminant stack
      assessment program, Aug 1985, 7;  possible control  under Indiana
      regulation, May 1990, 8; ratio of studied in woodstove tracers,
      June 1987, 9-10;   use of in GC/MI-R, Sept 1987, 13

 Polycyclic organic matter  (POM):  Dec 1986, 8; Jan  1989, 4;  Mar 1989, 11;
      EPA/OAQPS reports on, Nov  1987,  8-9;  and wood heater NSPS,  Dec 1986,  7;
      and IACP woodstove  emission measurement, Dec  1986, 9-10

 Polyester resin manufacturing:  Nov 1990, 1

 Power plants:   Rhode Island nuisance regulation includes,  Jan  1991,  1-2

 Power plants,  coal-fired:  all major air toxics sources  in New Mexico,
      Jan 1991, 3-4

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD):  Jan 1989,  5;  permit remand  in
      California, Mar 1987, 11


                                     A-39

-------
 Prioritization:   California  Air  Resources  Board  use  of  for  potential  toxic  air
       contaminants, May  1985,  6;  and drafting carcinogen  policy,  Dec  1983  (6);
       and New  York  air toxics  control  program, Dec 1983  (8);  and  toxic  air
       pollutants, Feb 1984,  5

 Program  Integration Project  Queries Using  Interactive Commands  (PIPQUIC)-
       described,  July 1989,  4-6

 Propanol, 2-:  and Michigan's  use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 4

 Propylene:  and  IARC evaluation  of wood smoke photo-oxidation products,
       June 1986,  5

 Propylene dichloride:  July  1989, 9

 Propylene glycol monomethyl  ether:  verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

 Propylene oxide:  May 1985,  6; May 1990, 8; and California Air Resources
       Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; verified
       RfC, Nov 1990, 2

 Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW):  Sept 1990, 7; as contributor to air
       toxics problem, Sept 1984, 2; and sludge disposal  rule, Jan 1990, 7

 Puget  Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA):  asbestos regulation
       adopted by, Mar 1986, 8; evaluates air toxics program, Mar  1990, 6-7;
       regulates air toxics, Nov  1990,  1; spotlight on, July 1988,  2-4; urban
       air toxics study described, June 1987, 7;  and waste-derived fuel
       regulation, Dec 1985, 4-5

Pyridine:  May 1990, 8

Quinone:   RfC non-verifiable, Nov 1990, 3

RACT:  See Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

Radiation:  monitoring at Oklahoma biomedical  waste incinerators required for,
      May 1991, 4, 7

Radionuclides:   May 1985, 6;  and California Air  Resources Contaminant
       Identification and  Control  Process,  Dec  1984,  5; and withdrawal  of EPA
      proposed standards  for, Dec 1984, 7-8

Radium facility wastes:   and  radon emissions from, Mar 1986, 3

Radon:  Sept 1989, 7;  Sept 1990,  4;  and indoor air,  Mar  1986,  3-5; Maine
      survey on,  Mar 1989, 2; measured in  Ohio,  Sept  1986, 6-7;  and proposed
      standards on radionuclides, Dec  1984, 8;  RAPCA  tests for in  schools,
      Mar 1989, 3-4; RAPCA's  study results  described, Mar 1987,  6-8;
      requirements of Superfund provisions  on, Mar 1989,  8;  risk communication
      programs  for,  Sept  1988,  6-7;  studied in Maine, June 1987,  7-8


                                    A-40

-------
Reasonably Available Control Technology  (RACT):  Sept  1988,  13; Jan  1989, 5;
      specified  in Kentucky  regulation,  May  1988, 3; used  in PM control at
      chemical manufacturer  in Tennessee, Jan  1988, 4

Reference doses,  (RfC)  inhalation:  See  also IRIS, Reference doses,  (RfD)
      inhalation; 39 finalized, Nov 1990, 1; used in Rhode  Island nuisance
      regulation, Jan  1991,  1-2

Reference doses,  (RfD)  inhalation:  See  also IRIS, Reference doses,  (RfC)
      Inhalation; Jan  1988,  5; defined by OHEA, July 1988,  6-7; methodology
      developed  for, July  1988, 6-7

Reference doses,  (RfD)  oral:  See also IRIS; July 1988, 6;  methodology
      explained,  May 1989, 8-9; used in  Rhode  Island nuisance regulation,
      Jan 1991,  1-2

Reference matrix  isolation infrared spectral library:  Sept 1987, 13

Refineries:  and  odor  in Staten Island/New Jersey, Sept 1990, 5; are major air
      toxics sources in New  Mexico, Jan  1991,  3-4; wastes from, July 1984, 2

Region II:  conducts joint air toxics study, Sept 1990, 5-6

Region III:  conducts  dioxin/furan incinerator testing, Sept 1986, 8-9

Region IV:  sponsors air toxics management workshop, Feb 1984,  3-5

Region V:  conducts air toxics inventory (Chicago),  Mar 1987, 6-7

Region VI:  accidental  release program, June 1986, 4-5; participates in EPA
      comparative risk  project, Sept 1990,  4-5; sponsors air toxics workshop,
      Feb 1984, 5-6

Region IX:  develops noncancer risk assessment, Jan 1990,  5-6

Region X:  completes VOC risk assessment, Sept 1987, 5-6;  organizes retreats
      for air toxics coordinators, Jan 1990,

Regional  Air Pollution Control  Agency (RAPCA):   compiles PM network data,
      Mar 1988, 7-8; completes point source emission inventory, Jan 1989,  7-8;
      describes indoor air program, Sept 1989,  7-8;  measures Ohio radon
      levels, Sept 1986, 6-7; results of radon study described, Mar 1987,  6-8;
      tests for radon  in schools,  Mar 1989,  3-4;  toxic emissions data base
      described,  June  1987,  10

Regional  Coordinators:  role of,  May 1988,  7

Regional  deposited dose ratios (RDDRs):   function in RfD derivation,
      July 1988,  7

Regional  Response Team (RRT):  and EPA air  toxics strategy, Aug 1985, 5


                                     A-41

-------
 M
 Reg Neg":  for equipment leaks complete, Mar 1991, 8; used to draft
      regulations on equipment leaks, Jan 1990, 2-3; used to draft wood heater
      NSPS, Dec 1986, 7

Remediation, soil:  Florida guidelines for, Jan 1990, 1, 10

Removal efficiency:  and air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 3

Reproductive Effects Assessment Group (REAG):  Jan 1988, 9

Residential Wood Combustion (RWC):  See Combustion, residential wood-fired

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA):  July 1989, 8; Sept 1990, 4;
      authority for development of standards for hazardous waste TSDF,
      July 1989, 9-10; and Chicago emissions inventory,  Mar 1987, 7;
      facilities assessment completed in Idaho, Sept 1987, 5-6; and TSDF
      regulations, Apr 1984, 5

Resource recovery facility:  certification of operators  of,  Mar 1986, 8-9;
      facilities required by California program to submit risk assessments,
      Dec 1986, 4; NESCAUM coordinates workshop on, Sept 1986, 10; New York
      program on stack emissions,  Sept 1986, 7-8;  and New York's toxic air
      contaminant stack assessment program,  Aug 1985,  7-8; Rhode Island
      nuisance regulation requires risk assessment for,  Jan  1991, 1-2

Resource Recovery Facility Emission Characterization (RRFECS):  See New York

Rhode Island:   amends nuisance regulation,  Jan 1991,  1-2; program to monitor
      solvents in ambient air,  Mar 1987,  5-6; spotlight  on Division of Air and
      Hazardous Materials,  Sept 1988, 2-4

Right-to-know amendments:  and Chemical  Emergency  Preparedness Program (CEPP),
      June 1986, 4; and Superfund, Dec 1985, 9; and workers  with respect to
      chemical  health effects,  Dec 1983 (6)

Risk assessment:  See also IRIS;  May 1988,  5; May  1989,  6; Dec 1989, 5;
      Sept 1990, 5; and air toxics, Feb 1984, 2; Air RISC Workshop on,
      July 1989, 11;  and Clean Air Act,  Dec 1983  (5);  conducted for MWCs,
      Sept 1987, 9; conducted in  urban air toxics  programs,  Sept 1987, 7;
      document for carcinogens available, Jan 1990, 9;  and equipment leak
      emissions, Jan  1990,  2-3; ECAO guide includes indirect exposures in,
      May 1991, 7-8;  EPA's integrated risk information  system described,
      Mar 1987, 8-9;  EPA forum on, Nov 1988, 7-8;  EPA guidelines available'on,
      July 1988, 11;  EPA introduces Air RISC, July 1988,  4-5;  EPA Region X
      study described,  Sept 1987,  5-6; five basic  concepts of,  Feb 1984, 4;
      for gasoline vapors conducted by NESCAUM,  Dec 1989, 6-8;  glossary and
      directory published,  Sept 1989, 10; HEM II available for, May 1991,  3;
      HERL study of process needs, Jan 1988, 10;  improvements  in methods
      called for,  Jan 1988,  7-8;  IRIS data base information  on, Sept 1987, 14;
      Maryland, Air RISC, and nickel, Jan 1991,  5; and NATICH  data base,
      June 1986, 1-2; NATICH report on carcinogens, Mar  1987,  1;  and NESCAUM


                                     A-42

-------
Risk assessment (continued):  regional strategy to control perchloroethylene,
      Dec 1985, 6-7; of paint spraying facility,  May 1989, 3-4; for point
      sources in NATICH, Nov 1988, 1-2; Region VI compares for 22 emission
      control problems, Sept 1990, 4-5; reproductive assessment guidelines
      for, Nov 1988, 10; requested in incinerator testing, Sept 1986, 9;
      required under new Clean Air Act, July 1990, 1; required under Senate
      version of proposed Clean Air Act Amendments, May 1990, 11; role of in
      benzene rulemaking, Feb 1984, 3; and risk management, Dec 1983 (5-6);
      role in California permit denial, Mar 1989, 5; topic at STAPPA/ALAPCO
      conference, Dec 1984, 2; and toxic cleanups Mar 1986, 6; and "two-step"
      benzene NESHAP process, Sept 1988, 9-10; for urban soup developed under
      PIPQUIC, July 1989, 4-6; (carcinogen) used by work group in examining
      solvent exposure, Nov 1987, 7; and waste oil handling and disposal,
      Feb 1984, 5; workshop on, Mar 1989, 5

Risk assessment, noncancer:  developed in California, Jan 1990, 6; OAQPS
      conducts, Jan 1990, 9

Risk assessment, use by States:  as basis for Connecticut toxic air pollutant
      regulation, Sept  1986, 4; and California Air Resources Contaminant
      Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 4-5; conducted in Chicago
      for urban cancer, Mar 1989, 10-11; Maine conducts assessment of wood
      smoke, Dec 1986,  8; Maryland, Air RISC, and nickel, Jan 1991, 5; new
      California program requires, July 1988, 5-6; New Jersey applies to
      carcinogens, July 1989, 6-7; relation to air toxics programs stressed by
      California agency, Dec 1986, 4; role in California permit denial,
      Mar 1989, 5; Santa Barbara develops model, Nov 1990, 8-9; used in New
      Jersey chemical accident prevention legislation, Sept  1986, 5; used in
      North Carolina regulation, Mar  1987, 4; used in Ohio sampling study,
      Nov 1988, 2-3; used  in Rhode Island nuisance regulation, Jan 1991, 5

Risk communication:  Air RISC distributes publications on, Mar 1991, 6-7; Air
      RISC helps agencies  improve, Sept 1990, 10;  EPA program on described,
      June 1987, 5-6; hotline for, Nov  1987,  10; NATICH report on planned,
      Mar 1988, 2;  for  small risks under SARA Title  III, Mar  1990, 1, 8-9

Risk management:  and air  toxics,  Feb  1984, 2; and California Air Resources
      Contaminant Identification  and  Control  Process, Dec  1984, 4-5; EPA's
      integrated risk  information  system (IRIS)  described, Mar 1987, 8-9; EPA,
      State  agencies  improve for  radon, Sept  1988, 6-7; IRIS  data base
      information on, Sept  1987,  14;  levels of and Santa  Barbara risk
      assessment model, Nov  1990,  8-9;  and Maryland's proposed air toxics
      regulations,  Sept 1987, 3-4; and  New Jersey  chemical accident prevention
      rule,  Mar  1988, 6-7;  New Jersey  program separates from risk assessment,
      July 1989, 7; and risk assessment, Feb  1984, 2; topic  at STAPPA/ALAPCO
      conference, Dec  1984,  2; used  in  New Jersey  to prevent chemical
      accidents, Sept  1986,  5; workshop on, Mar  1989, 5

Risk, Negligible:   defined  under  proposed Clean  Air  Act Amendments, May  1990,
      11; Senate offer  and,  Sept  1990,  3
                                      A-43

-------
Risk, Residual:  defined under proposed Clean Air Act Amendments, May 1990,
      11; Senate offer and, Sept 1990, 2

ROADMAPS:  introduced, Sept 1988, 13

Roanoke:  selected as IACP study site, May 1988, 5-6

Sampling, soil:  EPA/ESED report on TSDF covers, Dec 1986, 11

Santa Barbara APCD:  develops risk assessment model, Nov 1990, 8-9; writes new
      ethylene oxide rule, July 1990, 2-3

SARA Title III:  See Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriiation Act

Science review panel:  and drafting carcinogen policy,  Dec 1983 (6)

Selenium:  May 1990, 5,6

Sewage sludge:  May 1991, 7; OAQPS publishes report on, July 1990, 9; Ohio
      studies incineration emissions, May 1990, 5-6; Rhode Island nuisance
      regulation includes incineration of, Jan 1991, 1-2

Sewage treatment plants:   and Alaska ammonia standard,  Mar 1991, 1-2; and EPA
      Six Month Study, Apr 1984,  5;  and odor in Staten  Island/New Jersey,
      Sept 1990, 5; sludge disposal  regulations, Jan 1990, 7

Sick building syndrome:   Sept 1989,  7

Silica,  crystalline:  California  investigates source test method for,
      Mar 1991, 7-8

Site investigation:  and toxic cleanups,  Mar 1986,  6

Six Month Study, EPA:  See also National  Air Toxics Strategy; Apr 1985,  3-5,
      5-7; Aug 1985, 3-5; Dec 1985,  11; Nov 1988,  9; Jan 1989, 7;  and Agency's
      air toxics strategy, Apr 1984, 4-5; update issued, May 1989, 10

Sludge Regulation and Management  Branch:   regulates sewage sludge disposal,
      Jan 1990, 7

Smelters, copper:  are major air  toxics source in  New Mexico, Jan 1991,  3-4

Solid waste:   Texas regulations on disposal  of, Jan 1988, 3

Solid waste disposal:  EPA plans  regulation of, Sept 1987, 8-9; and EPA Six
      Months  Study, Apr 1984,  4;  NESCAUM sponsors  workshop on, Mar 1987, 8

Solvents:  Nebraska regulations to limit emissions, Sept 1989, 3;  new
      technology avoids in cleaning  printing equipment, May 1989,  7;  recycling
      emissions controlled by national standards,  July  1989,  9-10; Rhode
      Island  program to monitor ambient levels of,  Mar  1987,  5-6


                                     A-44

-------
 Source  assessment:   CAPCOA  publishes  manual  on,  Dec  1986,  4;  research  needs  in
      outlined, Jan  1988, 7-8

 Source  categories:   draft list developed  under Clean Air Act  Amendments,
      Mar  1991, 1-2; to  be  listed  under proposed Clean Air Act Amendments,
      May  1990, 10

 Source  Evaluation Society:  Jan  1991, 7

 Source, Major:  See  Major Sources

 Source  sampling methods:  See also Emissions testing; California amends
      select, Mar 1991,  7-8; California regulation allows  sharing data for,
      Mar  1990, 3; discussed at  Region VI workshop, Feb 1984, 6

 South Carolina:  county  agency community  awareness and emergency response
      program, Sept  1987, 5; regulates air toxics, Jan 1991,  2-3

 South Coast Air Quality  Management District  (SCAQMD):  controls landfill gas
      emissions, July 1990, 5-7; establishes rule covering permits,
      carcinogens, Mar 1989, 5-7; and rule governing toxic emissions from
      landfills, July 1984, 1-2; spotlight on, June 1987,  2-3

 South Dakota:  spotlight on Department of Water and Natural Resources,
      Nov  1987, 3

Speciation factors:   manual  on, Nov 1988,  9-10; OAQPS releases data base for
      VOC  and PM,  Jan 1991,  6; OAQPS revises manual on,  Mar 1990, 9, 10

Stack sampling:  See also Emissions testing; emissions from chemical plant
      studied, Feb 1985,  4;  New York resource recovery operation program,
      Sept 1986, 7-8; New York's toxic air contaminant assessment program on,
      Aug  1985, 7-8; performed at city incinerator, Sept 1986, 9; and resource
      recovery facilities, Mar 1986,  8-9;  used in Connecticut air toxics
      regulation,  Sept 1986, 5

STAPPA:   See State and Territorial  Air Pollution Program Administrators

State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
      (STAPPAJ/Association of Local Air Pollution Control  Officials (ALAPCO):
      July 1984, 6;  Sept  1984,  8; Dec 1984,  2-3;  and appointment of air toxics
      policy work  group,  Feb 1984,  6;  comments on proposed  municipal waste
      combustion regulations,  July 1990,  7;  conducts noncancer survey,
      Nov 1987, 10;  conference on air toxics control,  Sept  1986,  10; and EPA
      air toxics strategy, Aug 1985,  3-5;  conferences of,  Dec 1983  (3-4);
      coordinates  SARA Section 313  data collection,  July 1988, 7; members of
      NATICH working group meet,  Sept 1986,  1;  and  NATICH,  Dec 1983 (1);  and
      NATICH data  base, Dec  1985, 1-2; national  air toxics  workshops sponsored
      by,  June 1987,  8; and  policy  on  hazardous  air pollutants,  Feb 1985, 4-5;
      prepares report on  air permit and  emissions fees,  June  1987,  11;  and EPA
      Six Months Study, Apr  1984, 5-6; releases  survey results for  State and


                                     A-45

-------
State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators
      (STAPPAJ/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (ALAPCO)
      (continued): local agencies, Dec 1989, 10; sponsors urban air toxics
      workshops, Mar 1989, 9-10; survey of toxic air pollutants, Feb 1984, 6;
      updates toxic air pollutant report, Nov 1988, 9

State Implementation Plan (SIP):  and co-control of air pollutants, Jan 1989,
      4-6; and EPA's national air toxics strategy,  Nov 1987, 4; Title V permit
      to include requirements under, May 1991,  1-2

State/local air toxics control agencies:  July 1984, 2, 4; Dec 1985, 8;
      technical assistance for, Dec 1984, 2; partnership with Federal
      agencies, Aug 1985, 3-4; use TRI data, Jan 1990, 4-5

Stationary sources:  see also Point sources; Major sources; Sept 1987, 8; and
      Air Pollution/Cancer report, Apr 1984, 6;  audit cylinders available for,
      Aug 1985, 8; California rules to reduce cancer risk from, Mar 1989, 6;
      PM emissions from woodstoves limited by NSPS, Dec 1986, 7; subject to
      Title V operating permits program, May 1991,  1-2; VOC emissions at
      hazardous waste TSDF,  July 1989, 10

Steel plants, emissions from:  Air RISC publishes health effects summary for,
      Nov 1990, 9; CTC report on, Dec 1989, 6

Sterilizers, hospital and commercial:  control  of ethylene oxide proposed,
      May 1988, 9-10; emissions from considered in California exposure
      assessment, July 1990, 2, 3

Styrene:  May 1990, 8; May 1991, 9; Air RISC receives carcinogenicity
      question, Jan 1991, 5; and EPA prototype scheme for handling,
      Sept 1984, 3

Styrene-butadiene:  Jan 1989, 4

Styrene-butadiene rubber manufacturing:  High Risk Point Source study for,
      May 1991, 8-9; Oklahoma limits biomedical  waste incinerator emissions,
      May 1991, 4, 7

Substitute compounds:  and California Air Resources Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 4

Sugar beet processing:  VOC emissions from, May 1988, 4-5

Sulfur dioxide (S02):  Jan 1988,  3; Sept 1990,  4;  and municipal waste
      combustor standards, Mar 1991, 8-9; and New York's toxic air contaminant
      stack assessment program, Aug 1985, 7; Oklahoma limits biomedical waste
      incinerator emissions, May 1991, 4; as refinery waste site contaminant,
      July 1984, 2; as product of resource recovery facilities, Mar 1986, 8-9

Sulfur oxides (SO):  as emissions from residential wood combustion devices,
      May 1985, 4-5


                                     A-46

-------
 Sulfur trioxide (S03):   July  1990,  9

 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)  Title III:   July 1989,  7;
       May 1990,  3-4; Mar 1990,  10;  Jan 1991, 3;  communicating small  risk
       under,  Mar 1990,  1,  8-9;  and  community right-to-know amendment,
       Dec 1985,  9;  data available through NATICH/TRIS link,  Dec  1989,  1-2;
       data from Maryland industries,  Nov 1988,  6;  data quality  audits
       complete,  Sept 1990,  7;  data  used in Louisiana regulation,  Dec 1989,  3;
       directory for data base established (ROADMAPS),  Sept 1988,  13-14;  and
       equipment leak emissions,  Jan 1990,  2-3;  emissions  from Superfund  sites,
       May 1988,  7;  and  EPA air  toxics strategy,  Aug  1985,  6-7;  EPA coordinates
       Section 313  activities, July  1988,  7-8; establishes  toxic  release  data
       base, Nov 1988, 6-7;  and  EPA  Six Months Study,  Apr  1984, 4;  hazardous
       substances at Superfund sites must be listed under,  July  1989,  10;  IRIS
       data to include information on,  chemicals  listed by,  July  1988,  11;
       listed  chemicals  and  Florida  air toxics standards, Mar 1991,  4;  and
       Massachusetts Toxics  Use  Reduction Act, Sept 1990, 8;  OAQPS/OTS
       Section 313  plan  for  data,  May  1988,  7-8;  one  industry states  goals
       under,  Sept  1988,  13; Section 313 OTS concludes  QA pilot surveys under,
       Jan 1989,  12-13;  reporting  requirements,  Sept  1987,  11-12;  requirements
       of,  Dec 1986,  5-6;  requirements  for  radon, Mar 1989,  8; requires
       revisions  to  Hazard  Ranking System,  July  1989,  7-8;  STAPPA/ALAPCO  survey
       assesses effect of,  Dec 1989, 10;  Title III  workshops  conducted  on,
       June 1987, 11; Toxic  Release  Inventory developed for,  May  1988,  1-2

 Superfund sites:   See also  Superfund  Amendments  and  Reauthorization  Act  (SARA)
       Title III; emissions  studied, May 1988, 6-7; EPA issues directive  on  air
       stripper use  at,  Dec  1989,  9; hazard  ranking system, July  1989,  7-8

 Support Center for  Regulatory Air Models  (SCRAM):  and OAQPS  bulletin  board,
       Sept  1990, 10-11

 Surface coating:  Nebraska  regulation  to limit emissions, Sept 1989, 3

 Surface Impoundment  Modeling System (SIMS):  introduced by CTC, Dec  1989, 5-6

 Systems Applications Human  Exposure and Dosage (SHED):  Feb  1984, 4

 Systems Applications Human  Exposure and Risk (SHEAR):   Feb 1984, 4

 T-BACT:   See  BACT

 Tennessee:  See Chattanooga-Hamilton County APCB

Teratogens:   See Genetic toxicants

Tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDFs):  Oklahoma limits biomedical waste
       incinerator emissions, May  1991, 4, 7
                                     A-47

-------
 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,  2,3,7,8-  (2,3,7,8-TCDD):   Sept  1986,  8;  May  1990,
       8;  in  city  incinerator  ESP,  Sept  1986, 8;  and dioxin combustion source
       study,  July 1984,  7;  and  New York's  toxic  air contaminant  stack
       assessment  program, Aug 1985,  8;  Oklahoma  limits  biomedical  waste
       incinerator emissions,  May  1991,  4,  7

 Tetrachlorodlbenzo-p-diox1ns  (TCDDs):   Oklahoma  limits  biomedical  waste
       incinerator emissions,  May  1991,  4,  7

 Tetrachloroethane,  1,1,2,2-:  July 1989, 7; and  Michigan's use of  air
       stripping of VOCs, Dec  1985,  4

 Tetrachloroethylene:  July  1989,  7; May  1990, 5; July 1990, 9; detected in
       Rhode  Island  ambient  air, Mar  1987,  6

 Tetrahydrofuran:   May 1989, 9;  verified  RfC, Nov 1990,  2

 Tetrahydrothiophenes:  as refinery waste site contaminant, July  1984,  2

 Texas:  May  1989,  2-3; air  toxics  control  program, Dec  1983 (4); Houston
       Regional Monitoring Program  described, Mar 1988,  10; research division
       and functions of TACB,  July  1984,  5; and special  study identifying toxic
       air pollutants, Feb 1984, 6; spotlight on TACB, Jan 1988,  2-4;  TACB
       pilot  program assesses  existing sources, May 1991, 1-2

 Threshold Ambient  Limit  (TAL):  May 1988,  3

 Threshold Limit Values" (TLVs):   See ACGIH TLV

 Tiers  1-7:   See National Dioxin Strategy

 Tire Manufacturing:  EPA proposes  regulation of benzene from, Dec  1989, 11

 Toluene:  Jan 1989, 7, 8; Sept  1989, 3; May 1990, 5,  6,  8; regulatory status
      of under Clean Air Act,  Dec  1985,  10; and EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring
      program, Apr 1984, 5-6;  health impacts assessed in gasoline  study,
      Dec 1989, 6-8; and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs,  Dec 1985, 4;
      verified RfC, Nov 1990,  2

Toluene-2,4-di1socyanate:   listed  as Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance in
      New Jersey, Sept 1986,  5;  possible accidental releases studied  by CTC,
      June 1987, 4-5

Total Suspended Particulate (TSP):  Dec  1986,  8;  and EPA emissions inventory
      of carcinogens, June  1986, 10; and 1987 revision to NAAQS, Jan  1989, 4-5

Toxic Air Monitoring System (TAMS):  May 1989,  2; Sept 1990,  5; data currently
      available described,  June 1987, 9; established by EPA,  Apr 1984, 7;  to
      examine monitoring capabilities,  Dec 1989,  11;  functions defined,
      Mar 1986, 10; three monitoring sites established for,  May 1985,  7
                                     A-48

-------
Toxic air pollutants:  See Air pollutants, toxic

Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act:  passed by New Jersey, Sept 1986, 5

Toxicity model:  and Michigan's air toxics control program, Feb 1984, 4

Toxicity testing:  Oklahoma requires for biomedical waste incinerator ash,
      May 1991, 4

Toxic Release Inventory:  May 1988, 1-2, 8; Mar 1991, 1-2; EPA surveys States'
      use of data base, Jan 1990, 4-5; Region VI uses in comparative risk,
      Sept 1990, 5; risk screening guide available, Sept 1989, 10-11

Toxic Release Inventory System (TRIS):  May 1990, 3-4; July 1990, 3-5; access
      through NATICH data base, Dec 1989, 1-2; established, Nov 1988, 6-7;
      guide and hotline available, Sept 1990, 11; how to access, Nov 1988,
      6-7; OTS and data quality audit, Sept 1990, 7; used in draft source
      category list development, Mar 1991, 1-2

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA):  and chromium ban for cooling towers,
      May 1988, 9; and cooling tower standard for chromium, Sept 1990, 8-9;
      and EPA prototype scheme for handling toxic air pollutants, Sept 1984,
      3-4; and Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program (CEPP), June 1986, 3;
      Federal activities in, July 1984, 4; grants to States, analysis of,
      July 1984, 4; and Indiana regulation, May 1990, 1; information
      collection record keeping requirements of, and EPA air toxics strategy,
      Aug 1985, 6-7; inventory of chemicals in commerce, July 1984, 4; status
      report for existing chemicals, July 1984, 3

Trace metals:  trends  in Dayton, Ohio, monitoring of, Mar 1988, 8

Transfer operations:   EPA proposes regulation of benzene from, Dec 1989,  11

Transformation models:  improvements suggested, Jan 1988, 8

Treatment, storage,  and disposal facilities (TSDF):  Mar 1989, 11; as
      contributor to air toxics problem, Sept 1984, 2; emissions inventory of
      in Chicago, Nov  1987, and EPA emissions inventory of carcinogens,
      June 1986, 10; EPA/ESED report on soil sampling, Dec 1986, 11; National
      standards for emissions from, July 1987, 9-10; responsibility for
      developing regulations transferred, Apr 1984, 5; standards for prepared
      by OAQPS, July 1989, 9-10; 6-7

Tribromomethane:  and  Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985,  4

Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- (TCA):  Sept 1989, 3; May 1990, 5, 6, 8; detected in
      Rhode Island ambient air, Mar 1987, 6; and EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring
      program, Apr 1984, 5-6; link to ozone depletion, May 1989, 7-8; and
      Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 4
                                     A-49

-------
Trichloroethylene:  May 1985, 6; Sept 1987, 12; Sept 1988, 3; July 1989, 7, 9;
      Sept 1989, 9; May 1990, 5, 6; regulatory status of under Clean Air Act,
      Dec 1985, 10; and California Air Resources Contaminant Identification
      and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5; as contributor to air toxics problem,
      Sept 1984, 2-3; detected in Rhode Island ambient air, Mar 1987, 6; and
      EPA/IEMD ambient monitoring program, Apr 1984, 5-6; EPA decision on,
      Mar 1986, 9; and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs, Dec 1985, 4

Trichlorofluoromethane:  and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs,
      Dec 1985, 4

TSCA:  See Toxic Substances Control Act

TSCA Assistance Office (TAO):  functions of, Apr 1984, 7

Unit risk factors:  used in Dayton, Ohio,  monitoring, Mar 1988, 8;
      Nov 1988, 3

Uranium:  radon emissions from and indoor air, Mar 1986, 3-5; Uranium Mill
      Tailing Radiation Control Act, Mar 1986, 3; mines as sources of
      radionuclide emissions, Dec 1984, 8

Urban aerosols:  and Harvard School of Public Health project, May 1985, 7

Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP): Sept 1990, 5

Urban soup:  Jan 1988, 4; EPA high risk program on, Mar 1987, 6; EPA/OAQPS
      publishes report on, Jan 1989, 14; Maryland studies in Baltimore,
      Jan 1989, 12; NPPB issues document on, Sept 1989, 10; Ohio ambient air
      study, Nov 1988, 3; Ohio programs on, Mar 1987, 2; Philadelphia air
      toxics program and, July 1989, 9; PIPQUIC used to study, July 1989, 4-6;
      round-up on EPA's activities in all  regions, Sept 1987, 6-7; Seattle
      ambient air study of, July 1988, 2;  study of Midwest conditions,
      Jan 1990, 9; TAMS to examine monitoring of, Dec 1989, 11; treated in
      EPA's national air toxics strategy,  Mar 1987, 9-10; Washington agency
      studies, June 1987, 7; workshop on,  Mar 1989, 9-10

Urea:  and ammonia plant in Alaska ammonia standard, Mar 1991, 1-2; dust and
      Air RISC research on effects of, Nov 1988, 4-5

Users Network for Applied Modeling of Air Pollutants (UMAMAP):  Mar 1988, 2

Vanadium:  and New York's toxic air contaminant stack assessment program,
      Aug 1985, 7

Variance (for air toxics source):  defined by Wisconsin, Sept 1986, 3

Vermont:  asks Air RISC styrene question,  Jan 1991, 5; regulates CFCs,
      July 1989, 11; spotlight on Vermont Agency of National Resources,
      July 1989, 3-4; talc dust from quarry in, Nov 1988, 5
                                     A-50

-------
Vinyl acetate:  verified  RfC, Nov  1990, 2

Vinyl chloride:  May  1985, 6; July  1990, 9; and California Air Resources
      Contaminant  Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5

Vinyl cyclohexane:  May 1991, 9

Vinyl1dene chloride:  May 1985, 6;  Jan  1989, 4; July 1989, 9; May  1990, 8;
      court decision  on and benzene regulation, Sept 1988, 9; regulatory
      status of under Clean Air Act, Dec 1985, 10; and California Air
      Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5;
      EPA draft source/emission factor  report on, Dec 1984, 9; and EPA report
      on locating  and estimating emissions of, Dec 1985, 11

Virginia:  Air RISC addresses indoor air question in, Jan 1991, 5; finds
      carbon disulfide violation, Dec 1989, 4-5; joins air management
      association, May 1990, 2; noncriteria pollutant control rules adopted,
      Dec 1984, 5-6

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs):  Nov 1987, 6; Jan 1988, 3; Nov  1988, 9;
      Jan 1989, 4, 7; Mar 1990, 9;  Sept 1990,5; AEERL studies indoor air
      sources of,  Mar 1991, 4-5; and air stripping during groundwater clean
      up, Dec 1985, 2-3;  and cancer, Dec 1984, 3; CTC publications on,
      Sept 1988, 4-5; emissions from equipment leaks, Jan 1990, 2-3; and EPA
      air toxics monitoring data base, June 1986, 11; and EPA emissions
      inventory of carcinogens, June 1986, 10; EPA/OAQPS report on, Nov 1987,
      9; EPA Region X completes study of, Sept 1987, 5-6; and fiberglass
      marine structures,  May 1989,  7; Houston monitoring program, Mar 1988,
      10; Houston  monitoring program and, May 1988, 3-4; from Idaho sugar beet
      processing,  May 1988, 4-5; Louisiana prepares report on, May 1989, 9;
      Nebraska plans  data collection on, Sept 1989, 3; North Carolina
      pollution prevention programs reduces, Sept 1989, 7; Ontario air toxics
      assessment,  Mar 1988,7; removed by air stripping, Dec 1989, 9; removed
      in vacuum extraction process, Jan 1990, 10; surface impoundment model to
      assist in estimating, Dec 1989, 5-6; as tracers of mobile source PM,
      May 1989, 5

Volatile Organic Compounds Speciation:  EPA/OAQPS report on, Nov 1987, 9;
      species manual  available, Nov 1988, 9-10

Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST):   procedures for, Aug 1985, 8

Waferboard:   CTC report on manufacturing plants,  Dec 1989, 6; plant studied by
      CTC, June 1987, 4

Washington:   agency conducts urban air toxics study, June 1987, 7; PSAPCA
      evaluates air toxics program, Mar 1990, 6-7; Puget Sound Water Authority
      evaluates atmospheric deposition,  Dec 1989, 3-4;  spotlight on PSAPCA,
      July 1988, 2-4; spotlight on PSAPCA,  Nov 1990, 1; State proposes wood
      smoke legislation, June 1987, 6-7
                                     A-51

-------
Waste-derived fuel:  Allegheny County  (PA) regulation to control burning of,
      Dec 1986, 3; combustion and marketing of, Dec 1985, 4-5; New Jersey rule
      on, Apr 1984, 2

Waste disposal:  see Hazardous waste disposal, Solid waste disposal

Waste, hazardous:  May 1991, 7; and incineration at sea, Feb 1984, 6; and
      Puget Sound waste-derived fuel regulation, Dec 1985, 5

Waste incineration:  see headings under Incineration

Waste oil combustion:  NESCAUM presentation on, Sept 1984, 8; and toxic
      emissions, Dec 1984, 2

Waste oil handling and disposal:  as risk assessment case study, Feb 1984, 5

Wastewater treatment:  Sept 1988, 4; Mar 1989, 11; and California ethylene
      oxide rule, July 1990, 3; emissions inventory of in Chicago, Nov 1987,
      6-7; and EPA emissions inventory of carcinogens, June 1986, 10; and New
      Jersey chemical accident prevention rule, Mar 1988, 7

Water:  use of air strippers for, Mar 1988, 9

Water quality analysis:  conducted at incinerator ash pile,  Sept 1986,  9

Water treatment plants:  and New Jersey chemical accident prevention rule,
      Mar 1988, 7

Wisconsin:  authority to regulate air toxics upheld, Nov 1990,  4; program on
      hazardous air pollutants, Sept 1986,  2-4

Wood preservatives:  bibliography of,  Dec 1985, 9

Wood smoke:   and Aspen, Colorado, regulation on woodburning,  June 1986,  7-8;
      IACP studies nighttime plumes, Sept 1989, 5; and IARC  evaluation  of
      mutagenic activities of photo-oxidation products,  June 1986, 5-6;  Maine
      conducts assessment of, Dec 1986, 7-8; measurement of in IACP project to
      identify airborne carcinogens, Mar 1986, 7;  mutagenicity of emissions
      of, Nov 1988, 3-4; OAQPS produces public source announcements,
      Nov 1990, 9; State of Washington proposes legislation  on,  June 1987,
      6-7; study on woodstove emissions, Jan 1988, 11; tracers studied,
      June 1987, 9

Woodstoves:   See also Combustion, residential  wood-fired; and catalytic
      combustors, May 1985, 4-5; certification of in Washington  State,
      July 1988, 4; emissions from analyzed by GC/MI-R,  Sept 1987, 13;
      emissions from and conference on, Feb 1985,  6; emissions measured by
      IACP,  Dec 1986, 9-10; and EPA Six Months Study,  Apr 1984,  5; field study
      of conducted in Vermont and New York, Dec 1986,  8; included in Maine's
      wood smoke assessment, Dec 1986,  7-8; methods for sampling emissions of,
      Sept 1988, 11-12; operating characteristics  and relation to smoke


                                     A-52

-------
Woodstoves (continued):  tracers, June 1987, 9; "Reg Neg" used in drafting
      NSPS covering, Dec 1986, 7; as research area for AEERL, Feb 1985, 2-3;
      study of emissions of, Jan 1988, 11; Washington State proposes
      legislation to control emissions from, June 1987, 6; Washington State
      regulation on, July 1988, 2

Hood treatment:  Sept 1988, 4

Working group, NATICH:  appointment of, Dec 1983 (1, 3); approves NATICH
      objectives and guidelines, Feb 1984, 1

Workplace exposure guidelines:  Wisconsin recommendations for, Sept 1986, 3

Xylene:  May 1985, 6; Jan 1989, 7, 8; May 1990, 8; and California Air
      Resources Contaminant Identification and Control Process, Dec 1984, 5;
      detected in Rhode Island ambient air, Mar 1987, 6; and EPA/IEMD ambient
      monitoring program, Apr 1984, 5-6; health impacts assessed in gasoline
      study, Dec 1989, 6-8; and Michigan's use of air stripping of VOCs,
      Dec 1985, 4; verified RfC, Nov 1990, 2

Zinc:  May 1990, 5, 6; and New York's toxic air contaminant stack assessment
      program, Aug 1985, 7

Zinc oxide plants:  as inorganic arsenic emissions sources, Sept 1984, 9

Zinc smelters, primary:  as inorganic arsenic emissions sources, Sept 1984, 9
                                     A-53

-------