vEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-450/4-85-002
November 1984
Air
Receptor Model
Source Composition
Library
-------
-------
EPA-450/4-85-002
November 1984
Receptor Model Source
Composition Library
By
John E. Core And Jitendra J Shah
Nero And Associates
Portland, Oregon
And
John A Cooper
NEA, Inc.
Beaverton, Oregon
Contract No. 68-02-3837
EPA Project Officer- Dallas W Safriet
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
U S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office Of Air And Radiation
Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
-------
This report has been reviewed by the Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U.S Environmental
Protection Agency, and approved for publication as received from the contractor. Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency, neither does mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
EPA-450/4-85-002
-------
Preface
This document supports a series of technical reports describing Receptor
Models and their application to air resource management. The reader is
encouraged to refer to the following documents:
Volume No. Title EPA Publication No.
I Overview of Receptor Model Applications EPA/450/4-81-016a
to Particulate Source Apportionment
II Chemical Mass Balance EPA/450/4-81-016b
III User's Manual for the Chemical Mass EPA/450/4-83-014
Balance Model
IV Summary of Particle Identification EPA/450/4-83-018
Techniques
V Source Apportionment Techniques and EPA/450/4-84-020
Considerations in Combining Their Use
The body of information reported in this document is an initial effort
to gather, evaluate and compile technical data describing the chemical compo-
sition of source emissions. Because of resource limitations, this study has
placed highest priority on inclusion of size-resolved data sets that have
specifically been developed for receptor modeling studies. Other studies
reported in the literature have been included to the extent possible con-
sistent with data quality criteria. Due to the volume of non-size resolved
data, no attempt has been made here to compile all of the information currently
i n the literature.
The EPA Source Library represents an attempt to provide available source
characterization data in an organized manner for receptor model applications.
Profiles for individual sources may vary considerably from the values provided
in this document. Source specific data from local sources are therefore
preferable to the use of literature data and are recommended, particularly
for regulatory applications. Nevertheless, preliminary analyses, based on
source profiles obtained from this document, may be adequate to meet a number
of objectives. The user must ultimately assess whether the data in the
Source Library are appropriate for use in any particular application.
IV
-------
RECEPTOR MODEL
SOURCE COMPOSITION LIBRARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Preface iv
Acknowledgements v
I. Introduction I- 1
A. Source Emission Composition Requirements I- 2
B. Methodology I- 7
1. Literature Reviews 1-8
2. EPA's Environmental Assessment Database I- 8
II. The Source Profile Data Sets II- 1
A. Overview II- 1
B. Analytical Methods II- 2
1. X-Ray Fluorescence II- 5
2. Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis II- 5
3. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy II- 7
4. Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy II- 7
5. Carbon Combustion II- 8
C. Source Profile Codes II- 8
D. Data Ranking Criteria 11-13
1. Source Testing Method 11-13
2. Analytical Methods 11-13
3. Documentation 11-14
4. Representativeness 11-14
E. The Reporting Format 11-15
F. Source Profile Uncertainties 11-17
G. Preparing Source Profile Compositions 11-19
H. Calculating PMio Source Profiles 11-33
III. Source Emission Profiles III- 1
A. Combustion Sources III- A
B. Industrial Process Losses III- B
C. Transportation Sources III- C
D. Area Sources III- D
Appendix A - References
Appendix B - Additional Literature
iii
-------
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to the following organizations for their support of,
and participation in, this effort through the submission of data sets and/or
recent publications.
General Motors Research Laboratory
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority
State of Montana Department of Public Health
Texas Air Resource Board
University of Maryland
U.S. EPA, Environmental Science Research Laboratory
Tennessee Valley Authority
University of Illinois
Department of Energy, Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center
In addition, the contributions of Dr. John G. Watson, Jr. of the Desert
Research Institute, University of Nevada are acknowledged for his assistance
in preparing portions of the text describing profile compositing and PM. .-
profile calculation methods.
-------
To insure that the data reported herein is as current as possible, nearly 100
researchers that have, or are currently working in, source emission
characterization have been contacted to determine: (a) the nature of source
composition data sets in their possession, and (b) the availability of the
data for inclusion in this document. Finally, a major effort has been made to
review, edit and document the source library data bases currently being used
by receptor modelers. Since most of these data were specifically designed for
receptor modeling studies, they represent an extremely important resource to
all users.
The report is divided into four major sections: The introductory chapter
describes the source emission composition requirements of the models,
appropriate cautions related to the use of the data and a description of the
study methodology. Chapter II discusses the data sets included in the
document, particle size distribution of emissions, analytical methods, the
data ranking system used, the data tabulation format and a discussion of
source profile uncertainties. Methods used to calculate PM,Q profiles and
combine profiles from similar sources are also presented.
Chapter III is the heart of the document the source emission composition
profiles. Appendix A lists the references for each of the profiles included
in the document and Appendix B, contributed by J.G. Watson of the Desert
Research Institute, lists additional references containing useful emission
composition information.
A. Source Emission Composition Requirements
Source chemical composition data are an important part of interpretive
receptor modeling. Although a great deal of source composition data has
been published, it has never been compiled in a single document for use in
receptor modeling applications.
1-2
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
Substantial progress has been made over the past ten years in reducing
particulate matter levels in many areas of the United States. There are,
however, many areas that are still not attaining the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter. In many of these cases,
revised control strategies requiring the imposition of additional controls
will need to be developed. Because of the costs involved with implementing a
control program, proposed strategies must be critically evaluated in terms of
their costs and overall effectiveness.
The development of air pollution control programs by State and local agencies
and the evaluation of the effectiveness of these programs require an
understanding of the following:
Chemical and physical characteristics of particulate matter,
« Origin of the particulate matter, and
The contribution of each source to the nonattainment problem.
Until recently, dispersion models based on source emissions and meteorological
parameters have been the primary tools used by the State and local agencies to
estimate the air quality impact of a source at a receptor site. Within the
past four years, however, receptor-oriented models have become more widely
(1 2)
used as a source assessment tool. * Receptor models are a family of
techniques which examine the ambient sample and conditions of its collection
(3 t)
to infer, the relative mix of sources impacting the receptor ' . Because of
the importance of understanding the true impact of source emissions and the
limitations of dispersion models, receptor model techniques have been
developed as an alternative approach. This document is a compilation of
source profile data essential to the application of many of the receptor
modeling techniques.
The purpose of this report is to: (1) update and expand earlier unpublished
efforts to compile a source library, (2) assess the usefulness of each data
set in terms of its applicability to chemical receptor models, and (3) compile
the most useful profiles into one, central document.
1-1
-------
Data Set Limitations
Because very little of the data reported in the literature have been
specifically developed for receptor modeling applications, users must
be aware of the limitations of each data set, specifically with respect
to measurements of carbonaceous emissions and volatile elements (Pb,
Zn, As, etc.) that partially exists in the gaseous phase at high stack
temperatures. Unless special precautions (i.e., dilution source
sampling, aircraft or balloon methods) are taken, these components will
not be accurately represented in the data. In addition, many of the
studies found in the literature, because of the sampling and analytical
protocols employed, do not report a sufficiently broad range of aerosol
components to account for the majority of the aerosol mass. Receptor
model studies that use these source profiles are typically unable to
satisfactorily explain the concentrations of trace elements,
carbonaceous or ionic species measured in the ambient aerosol, a
deficiency that often limits the ability of receptor models to
accurately apportion all of the ambient aerosol mass. In addition,
source impacts calculated on the basis of a small subset of trace
elements in the source profile are subject to much greater uncertainty
than those that utilize the full complement of aerosol features.
The source emission profile data should be carefully reviewed to ensure
that they reasonably represent the sources in the airshed being
studied. Adjustments to the composite transportation emission profile,
for example, must be made in recognition of the differences in the
ratio of leaded/unleaded/diesel fuel use in the specific airshed of
interest. Similar evaluations of the original literature for each
source of interest and its applicability to the airshed being
studied should be completed to ensure that the source profile data
used is representative of reality. To assist the reader in
understanding the origin and limitation of each profile, a brief
abstract of each data set accompanies each profile. Table 1-1 can be
used as a guide to evaluate the applicability of source profile data to
the area being evaluated.
1-4
-------
A critical requirement for the success of receptor models is that the
composition of the emissions ar.d particle size properties from all major
sources within the airshed must be as accurately known as possible.
Although the body of information contained in any source library can be
extremely useful in receptor model studies, characterization of the
emissions from local sources (where possible) is preferable to the use of
literature data, just as actual measurements of source emission rates are
preferred to generalized emission factors. Knowledge of the composition,
or profile, of source emissions is required for all forms of receptor
models, including the analytical techniques (i.e., optical microscopy or
x-ray diffraction). Figure 1-1 is an example of typical source profile.
Multivariate techniques such as factor analysis and target transformation
factor analysis, while they do not require source profile data as a direct
input to the model, still rely on the analyst knowledge of source emission
composition to enable a common name such as soil dust to be applied to an
abstract group of particle features. Although extensive libraries of
particle reference samples and x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns have been
developed for polarized light microscopy and XRD analysis, a centralized
library of source composition data has not been previously available.
a
LJ
21 -
2O -
19 -
ia -
17 -
18 -
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
11 -
10 -
9 -
a -
7 -
6 -
5 -
4 -
3 -
2 -
1 -
0 -
-T
NA
COAL FLYASH PROFILE
WEIGHT PERCENT. TSP FRACTION
nrt
MG
r^~
AL
SI K CA
ELEMENT
FE
BA
Figure 1-1 . Typical Source Profile
1-3
-------
Source profile nomenclature used in receptor modeling studies should be
carefully reviewed before they are adopted by the analyst. For
example, different studies have reported impacts from "calcium
sources," "construction" and "cement dust" while, many in fact, are
based on the chemical composition of Portland cement dust. It is the
user's responsiblity to evaluate and apply the most appropriate common
name to these profiles.
Similarly, impacts associated with geologic, or crustal, sources have
been referred to as shale, paved road dust, windblown soil,
agricultural tilling, rock crusher emissions, rock quarry dust or
unpaved road dust, depending upon the investigator's analysis of which
crustal source is most likely to be impacting the receptor.
Ideally, source emissions and ambient aerosol characterization programs
should be based upon identical methods of particle sizing and chemical
analysis to ensure, to the maximum extent possible, compatibility
between the two data sets. Because the chemical composition of many
emission sources is known to be a function of particle size,
application of source profile data based on the TSP fraction «30 urn)
to source apportionment of particulate mass in the fine particle
fraction «2.5 urn) may severly compromise the validity of the analysis.
The source composition profiles must also be representative of airshed
emissions at the time the ambient aerosol sampling occurs. Variations,
for example, in the seasonal nature of the emissions may require that
some sources be more accurately characterized than others during
certain periods of the year.
Finally, the user should be aware of the potential variability in the
chemical composition of emissionsboth within a source group and
/ C Q \
between similar sources . Because of the limited availabilty of
high-quality size-resolved source profile data sets, an indepth
evaluation of the magnitude of profile variability is not yet possible.
Cursory comparisons of TSP profiles that have appeared in literature
suggest that profile variability is highly dependent upon the chemical
1-6
-------
TABLE 1-1. Source Profile Considerations
Transportation Sources:
Leaded/unleaded/diesel vehicle mix
Br/Pb ratio assumptions
Vehicle mix in the near vicinity of the receptor
Lead content in leaded gasoline
Soils:
Local soil/literature chemistry consistency
Importance of limestone in local soils
Local soil enrichment by source emission deposition
Residual Oil Combustion:
Similarity of local fuel trace element composition
Use of fuel additives
Primary Metals:
Chemical composition of alloys
Process similarities
Coal Combustion:
Similarity in coal sulfur and trace element composition
Control equipment similarities
1-5
-------
'1. Literature jteview
The source profiles contained herein were obtained from the
literature, new data sets obtained during this effort and from
unpublished data contributed by receptor model researchers. The
literature survey included documents identified during a computerized
literature search provided by the EPA Library in Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina. A search was also made of Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory's (IERL) Project Profile System
(PPS) and the Combustion Emission Analysis Catalog System (CCEA)
developed as part of lERL's source assessment program. In addition to
these sources, data was collected from a number of source composition
and receptor modeling studies conducted over the past several years
and from source profile data contained in the EPA-IERL Fine Particle
Emission Information System (FPEIS) data base. Although the FPEIS
system contains a great deal of data describing the mass distribution
of source emissions, much of the data is not of direct use to receptor
modelers because (a) the data is reported in concentration (^ig/m )
units rather than in weight percent and (b) little or no supportive
information is available to convert the data to the correct units. A
complete bibliography of references reviewed during this effort is
listed in Appendix A.
2. EPA Environmental Assessment Database
Much of the emission characterization data reported in the literature
has been developed by the EPA Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory (IERL) as a part of their Level 1 Environmental Assessement
(EA) program. The Level 1 protocol is intended to provide comprehen-
sive emission characterization information on all process streams in a
cost effective manner. This requires the application of
semiquantitative ( ± a factor of 3) sample collection and analysis.
Although the EA Level 1 data base is a valuable resource, receptor
model application of the data imposes several important limitations;
condensable particles are not included in the cyclone and filter
catches but instead are sampled and analyzed as a- single composite.
More importantly, the Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy technique used
1-8
-------
composition of fuels or process materials, the volatility of specific
elements, the point within the process cycle that the sampling occurs
and the analytical techniques used. Figure 1-2 illustrates the degree
of variation in coal flyash composition reported in Table II-2. Given
the variety of variables that may influence the data and the limited
research that has been conducted to date, the reader should be aware
that the profile uncertainties reported herein must be regarded as
tentative.
J6OJ5
150% -
1405! -
130% -
120% -
110%
100X -
90% -
30% -
70% -
60% -
SOX
4O% -
3O5S -
20%
10% -<
0%
COAL FLYASH PROFILE
COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION (J5>
MG AL SI K CA
.ELEMENT
FE BA
Figure 1-2. Coal Flyash Profile Variability
B. Methodology
Tasks completed during this project included; (1) reviewing and editing
existing receptor model source composition data sets; (2) entry of all of
the data into a standardized format; (j) surveying and soliciting new data
from receptor model researchers; (4) evaluation and documentation of each
data set; (5) development of a methodology for estimating the chemical
composition of the particle fraction less than 10 urn (PM1Q) and, (6)
development of guidance to be used in combining source profiles from
similar sources.
1-7
-------
for elemental analysis of the samples does not provide the level of
quantitative data required by receptor models, major elemental
components of the sample are often not reported and profile components
are routinely reported in emission factor units (ng/Joule) or stack
concentrations (ug/rrr). Consequently, Level 1 EA data sets have not
been included in this document. The data does, however, provide
qualitative information that can be of value in designing, source
characterization studies.
1-9
-------
information is available in the open literature for iron and steel
sources.
Table II-1 presents the trace element composition of coal flyash as a
function of particle size. Unfortunately, several of the primary
components (Si, Ca, K, and Mg) were not included in the analysis.
The composition of coal flyash has been extensively studied by a number of
investigators. An attempt has been made to include several representative
data sets in this document rather than to present a comprehensive analysis
of the composition of coal flyash. Table II-2 summarizes results obtained
from five studies. In general, these studies indicate that the
concentration of Pb, Sb, Cd, Se, As, Zn, Ni, Cr and Cu increase markedly
with decreasing particle size while V, Mn and Be seem to be independent of
particle size. Volatile elements, such as Se and Hg, that are largely
found in the gaseous phase at stack temperatures are not accurately
represented since stack-gas dilution sampling methods have not been widely
employed.
B. Analytical Methods
A variety of analytical techniques have been used to identify the chemical
composition of the source emissions included in this document. These
include: (1) atomic absorption, (2) instrumental neutron activation
analysis, (3) X-ray flourescence, (4) spark source mass spectrometry, (5)
ion chromatography, (6) carbon combustion and organic carbon extraction
techniques.
Some of these techniques can detect and quantify the concentration of many
elements while others can detect certain elements but cannot accurately
quantify their concentrations. The data cannot be segregated by analysis
techniques to identify profile variability as a function of analytical
method, because a variety of techniques have been used.
The most common analytical techniques are:
11-2
-------
II. THE SOURCE PROFILE DATA SETS
A. Overview
Many of the studies included in this document contained chemical composi-
tion data for sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (AD, silicon (Si),
phosphorous (P), sulfur (S), chlorine (CD, potassium (K), calcium (Ca),
titantium (Ti), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni),
copper (Cu), vanadium (V), zinc (Zn), bromine (Br), and lead (Pb). A few
studies or reference contained data for organic carbon (OC), elemental
carbon (EC), nitrate ion (NO ~), carbonate ion (CO ~2), sulfate ion
_2 3 o
(SO. ), cobalt (Co), and arsenic (As). Very few studies contained data
on flouride (F), cadmium (Cd), beryllium (Be), tin (Sn), antimony (Sb),
scandium (Sc), selenium (Se), rubidium (Rb), strontium (Sr), cesium (Cs)
or elements with atomic numbers less than 14 (silicon).
Although most of the studies provided data on total particulate«30um),
relatively few data sets provided information on other particle sizes. In
general, particle size data were available for <2.5um, 2.5-10um, and
<30um. However, some studies provided data in other size ranges. In
those cases where other than <2.5, 2.5-10 and <30um fractions were
reported in the reference, a footnote will be found on the profile.
Because the particle size data were extremely limited, data for other size
ranges were incorporated into the three standard size ranges based on the
assumption that the chemical composition of similar size cuts (i.e., 1.5,
2, and Sum particles), were very similar to that of the standard groups.
Adoption of this assumption is necessary until such time that more
particle size data sets are available.
Because of the limited volume of data, there may be only one reference for
many of the source types listed in Section III. A limited number of
particle size data sets are available for almost all source categories,
however. Particle size data from more than one study are available for
transportation sources, external combustion, ferroalloy manufacturing,
secondary nonferrous industries, aluminum processing, glass furnaces, wood
waste boilers, crustal and vegetative burning sources. Very little good
II-l
-------
TABLE II-2
COAL FLYASH COMPOSITION
(HEIGHT PERCENT, TSP FRACTION)
SPECIE
NUMBER
11
12
13
14
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33
34
35
40
48
51
56
56
80
82
SPECIE
NAME
NA
M6
AL
SI
5
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
NN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
ZR
CD
SB
BA
CE
H6
PB
NBS FLYASH 11633 ALAN POHER
(1) PLANT (2)
0.320 +-0.040
1.800 +-0.400
12.700 +-0.500
21.000 t-2.000
0.170 +-0.030
0.004 H).001
1.610 +-0.150
4.700 +-1.500
0.740 +-0.030
0.023 +-0.001
0.013 +-0.001
0.050 H).002
6.200 f-0.300
0.004 HJ.OOO
0.010 H).00l
< +-
0.022 +-0.003
0.006 +-0.004
0.001 +-0.000
0.012 -HKOOl
0.030 +-0.002
< +-
0.001 H5.000
0.270 +-0.200
0.015 t-0.002
0.020 ESTIMATED
0.008 +-0.001
0.500
1.500
20.500
NR
<
<
1.600
1.500
0.235
0.042
0.027
0.060
16.250
0.005
<
0.515
1.500
0.019
<
0.001
<
0.001
0.000
1.500
<
0.000
0.015
AVERA6E OF
4 KOHALCZYK
STUDIES(3)+- STD. DEV. ET.AL.U)
.
0.900 +-
11.700 *-
24.000
<
<
3.300 +-
3.800 +-
1.000
0.080
0.065
0.034
10.600 f-
0.008 +-
0.037
0.031
0.520
0.050 +-
<
<
<
0.004 +-
<
<
<
<
0.090
0.203
0.400 0.660
3.000 12.700
NR
<
0.025
1.000 1.650
0.300 1.143
0.762
0.038
0.020
0.03B
4.000 8.890
0.001 0.006
0.025
0.051
0.064
0.030 ' 0.076
0.019
0.050
<
0.001 0.003
0.003
0.114
0.015
<
0.051
BOLTON.ET.
AL.(5)
0.280
0.880
10.000
10.000
0.105
<
1.280
1.000
1.000
0.010
<
0.055
10.000
0.006
1.000
0.040
0.090
0.005
0.020
<
<
0.001
0.001
0.010
<
<
0.010
MEAN VALUES COEFFICIENT
REF 1-5.*- STD.DEV. OF VARIATION
0.261 +-
1.148 *-
13.520 +-
18.333 +-
0.055 *-
0.006 +-
1.888 *
2.429 +-
0.747 *-
0.039 *-
0.025 +-
0.047 *-
10.388 *-
0.006 +-
0.214 +-
0.127 4-
0.439 4-
0.031 *-
0.008 *-
0.013 *-
0.006 *-
0.002 +-
0.001 *
0.379 +-
0.006 +-
0.004 +-
0.035 *-
0.163
0.429
3.627
10.119
0.070
0.010
0.718
1.523
0.279
0.024
0.022
0.010
3.297
0.001
0.393
0.195
0.560
0.028
0.009
0.019
0.012
0.001
0.001
0.569
0.007
0.008
0.032
62.51
37.41
26.81
55.21
128.01
167.71
38.01
62.71
37.41
61.11
87.91
20.91
31.71
22.21
183.31
152.71
127.61
89.21
117.51
132.71
200.01
81.61
120.31
150.21
122.51
200.01
91.71
SU« (I!
NOTES:
(1)
(2)
49.726
NR * NOT REPORTED
45.770
56.219
26.606 35.793
COAL FLYASH MIXTURE OBTAINED FROM ESP CATCH (UNIV. MARYLAND ANALYSIS) REF 12
TVA PONERPLAN BURNING 13.41 ASH, 3.52 S BITUMINOUS COAL .
ESP CATCH (REF 13)
(3) AVERAGE VALUES FROM 4 EARLIER STUDIES AS REPORTED BY HEISLER,1975.
ST. LOUIS STUDY (REF. 14)
(4) ANALYSIS OF STACK SAMPLES BY INNA (UNIV. OF MARYLAND) NORMALIZED
TO 12.71 AL. (REF. 15)
(5) ANALYSIS OF COAL FLYASH OBTAINED FROM TVA's ALAN PLANT BURNING 10.51 S
BITUMINOUS COAL SAMPLED AT ESP OUTLET (REF. 16)
II-4
-------
TABLE II-l . TRACE METALS IN COAL FLYASH AS A FUNCTION OF PARTICLE SIZE
a
Element
Al
B
Cd
Cr
Cu
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb
V
Concentration (wt. %)
12.5 - 25 pm
6.70
0.30
<
0.13
0.15
4.00
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.20
10 - 12.5 pm
5.43
0.50
<
0.13
0.15
5.90
0.24
0.20
0.20
0.20
3 - 10 jim
5.73
0.50
<
0.13
0.20
4.35
0.29
0.20
0.30
0.30
1.5 - 3 pm
6.36
0.50
<
0.30
0.20
3.50
0.39
0,30
0.30
0.20
< 1 . 5 pm
5.93
0.50
0.100
0.30
0.20
3.23
0.50
0.30
0.50
0.20
Sample collected from a coal-fired steam power plant and analyzed by neutron
and spark source mass spectrometry. Source: Lee, 1975. Reference 11.
activation
II-3
-------
01
1
H
&
0
EH
H
Id
O
rH
-P
i-H
(d
s
rJ
id
+J
C
CD
g
s
rH
a
£j
o
H
U
id
N
'rH
SH
O
rfl
(d
J3
O
0)
O
3
S
M
1
H
H
S
CO
EH
to
O
H
4->
0
rH
id
C
rl
'C &^
8 1
'-' "
§c
0
H
in _p
o
o) id
/MH
EM
p"j
X
0)
wo o
d) Cm rH
0] 'CJ Of
(Q rH C ^
H Id 3 O
g C 0 0
fcj r-( | 0
fO C M-(
S S M
H * +J CO
O >t X
,Q H CP i
0) 0) H
0 -H -H .§ C
S tn 2 -P id
^
JH ** *
» CQ MH ,Q
> K >!
C
N » 0) -
rl W 3 C
EH W H
3
U - 01 >
» u to to o
0) -
fa * * C »
^ rtj O O tf*
id -
O - - 3 -
H !>4 U nj fc
2 i-5 to
!IM ^ **
*» rH 0 *" "*
- C O U id JD
rH S CQ 2
o * -
ix > < fa w id
M CJ O
>^-H tr>c - A -
CUfflEH 2SMEH-HS
2
HCUrH id^J3fd »3
tOC/3*^ 2OU3EHtOr-5
rH H
id id
C G
H -H
O SH 0 !H
Sid 0 id
SO S
^ _
§rj
0
H
in -p
o
IN id
V <4-l
Si
J2
H
0)
g *" O
0 to to
01 <0
CJ M
» C _ 0
+J w -
H 01 t3
0 j-i .p o Cr>
03 £? rH ,£*
W (1) 3 -P ^Q)
rH IH r-t +>
p i -ri id a
(U 0) O g
id "c 3 O, rH
a -H ^3 to a)
" -rH
Offl
^
* XI
C Cu
»
H {Jl
SH tB
o
» tn
nj O fi
O c*3
«* r^J *
» **
O1 M H
S to >
!»*«»
fd -Q -rH
2 3 EH
^ «* *
(U 3 -r)
CQ O to
H -i-l i-H
jjj 2 i^
«
rH
01 Q,
H S 3 to
"T3 wj
% O rH
rH ^ X! -O
C rd Q) 3
4J it-t fl 4J
id O fi -H
SH OH
Id >. -H -H
-n
O O ^J
rH i^J 03 rH *H
a -H -H -o
i J5 «3 rC 0
to EH U -P O
H
"* A EH
3 f^
N
» id CQ
3 (H
O - .
u%*
&4 ^
» H
8 1
to to
to ~&
S to
0) >i
o a
SH 0
3 U
0 to
to o
M
y -P
H 0
id 0)
f^, o.
to to
,^^
r^
rH
O
u
0)
Q)
M-l
Q)
05
^^
tfl
-------
X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)
* Instrumental Neutron Activation Analyses (INAA)
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy (SSMS)
Carbon Combustion
One of these techniques, AAS, requires a separate analysis for each
element, while others are non-destructive, multi-element methods. Table
II-3 describes the limitations of each method.
1. X-Ray Fluorescence
X-ray fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) involves production of
characteristic fluorescence spectra by direct irradiation of the
sample with X-rays. For analyzing air pollution aerosols, the method
has the following advantages: no sample preparation is required;
elements of atomic number 11 (sodium) and greater can be analyzed with
fairly uniform detectability; the technique is nondestructive; and
several elements can be determined simultaneously with available
commercial equipment at low cost. Although this method does not have
the sensitivity of instrumental neutron activation analysis or
spark-source mass spectrometry, the detection limits may be improved
by using preconcentration techniques. Precisions of +- 10 percent or
less for microgram quantities of trace elements are typical.
2. Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis
In INAA, the sample is directly irradiated in a nuclear reactor with
no chemical dissolution or extraction. When bombarded by slow
neutrons, many elements give rise to radioactive isotopes which emit
radiation in the gamma-ray spectrum. The individual elements and
their concentrations may be identified by examining the gamma-ray
spectrum for these different radiation peaks. The main problem is
interfering radioactivities. This can be minimized or eliminated by
using radioactive separation to remove those elements which may
interfere. The advantages of using INAA are that the method is
II-5
-------
Although detection limits with this method for most elements are in
the parts-per-billion range, accuracy may be only + 50 percent,
varying with the concentration of interferents, and data
interpretation. Accuracy may be improved with the use of standards or
with the use of stable isotope dilution method (SSMS-ID). For
elements having stable isotopes, the accuracy of this method is
restricted only by the homogeneity of the photographic emulsion on
(9)
which the ion intensity is recorded.
5- Carbon Combustion
Carbon analysis is conducted by heating samples collected on glass or
quartz fiber filters in an oxygen atmosphere at 600 C to oxidize
the carbon to CO., following which the CO. is reduced to CH, on
a MnO- bed heated to 900 C. The methane is then measured by a
flame ionization detector (FID). A portion of the same filter is then
acidified within the sample combustion chamber, reducing carbonate ion
present to CO., which in turn is further reduced to CH, and
measured by FID. Since the total carbon measurement includes
carbonate as well as carbon, some of the carbon values reported herein
may have been corrected for carbonate interference. Other carbon
measurements reported in this document (e.g., References ^5, 46) have
been corrected for artifact elemental carbon, while other data sets
may not include corrections.
C. Source Profile Codes
Table II-4 presents the profile coding system used in this document. The
intent of the system is to provide a simple yet flexible means of
categorizing source profile information. Profiles have been coded into
combustion sources (10000 series), industrial process losses (20000
series), transportation sources (30000 series) and area sources (40000
series). The primary and secondary categories are largely consistent with
National Emission Data System (NEDS) source groups. Specific profiles
within a source group are sequentially numbered from 1 to 99. Readers,
for example, interested in accessing all of the source profiles for coal
flyash from anthracite coal-fired utility boilers should refer to profile
numbers 11101-11199, while transportation sources burning leaded gasoline
are listed in the 31101 to 31199 profile series.
II-8
-------
nondestructive, it offers high sensitivity, reproducibility, and the
capability for multielemental determinations, with no pretreatment of
the sample. Analytical precision ranges from 2-10% for most elements.
3. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
In AAS, the sample must be vaporized by a flame or other energy
source. Monochromic light of the same wavelenght as the element being
analyzed, is passed through the va]pr/ The atoms which are present in
the ground (unexcited state) in the vapor, absord the light radiation
in proportion to their concentration. This depletion of energy can be
measured yielding the concentration of a specific element. Problems
that may be confronted include: contaminants in the prepared
solution; matrix effects and molecular absorptions. Analytical
precision is generally in the order of +- 10%.
Flame AAS can be used to determine Be, 8, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag,
Cd, and Pb concentrations. Flameless AAS can be used for Bi, Se, Sn,
Te, Be, Pb, As, Cd, Cr, Sb, And Ge. The two methods are often used to
compliment each other.
4. Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
Spark-source mass spectrometry (SSMS) is an analytical survey method
with good sensitivity. In this method, the samples, compounded in a
silver or graphite electrode, are ionized with a high intensity spark.
The intensities of the ions of different mass-to-charge ratios are
measured and define different radial paths in a magnetic field. The
sample spectrum is brought to a focus at varying points along a
photographic plate positioned on the focal plane of the magnetic
analyzer. Other modes of detecting individual isotopes include
scanning of the ion species at a collector slit located at the
principal focus. The method has several advantages, including high
sensitivity, comprehensive element coverage, and linearity.
Semi-quantitative determinations as low as 100 ppb for some elements
can be performed by electrical scanning. This method also exhibits
linear response for ionic concentration of the element in the sample.
II-7
-------
17000 Solid Waste Disposal - Governmental
17100 Municipal Incineration
17200 Open Burning
17300 Other
18000 Solid Waste Disposal - Commercial
18100 Incineration
18200 Open Burning
18300 Apartment
19000 Solid Waste Disposal - Industrial
19100 Incineration
19200 Open Burning
20000. Industrial Process Losses
20000 Secondary Metals (Hon-Ferrous)
20100 Aluminum
20200 Copper Alloys (Bronze/Brass)
20300 Zinc
20400 Lead
20500 Other
21000 Fugitive Emissions
21100 Ore and Raw Material Handling
21200 Coal and Coke Handling
21300 Mining/Quarrying
21400 Grain Handling
21500 Processed Material Handling
22000 Wood Products
22100 Particleboard Drying
22200 Woodfiter
22300 Other
23000 Pulp and Paper (Kraft)
23100 Recovery Furnace
23200 Lime Kiln
240QO Pulp and Paper (Sulfite)
24100 Recovery System
25000 Chemical and Allied Products
25100 Inorganic Pigments
25200 Calcium Carbide Production
25300 Charcoal Manufacturing
25400 Other
26000 Petroleum Refining
26100 Process Heaters
26200 Catalytic Crackers
26300 Other
11-10
-------
TABLE II-4 . Source Profile Codes
10000. Combustion Sources
Profile No.
1JOOO External Combustion Boilers (Electric Generation)
11100 Anthracite Coal
11200 Bituminous Coal
11300 Subbituminous Coal
11400 Lignite
11500 Residual Oil
11600 Distillate Oil
11700 Natural Gas
11800 Wood Waste
11900 Solid Waste
[2000 External Combustion Boilers (industrial)
12100 Anthracite Coal
12200 Bituminous Coal
12300 Subbituminous Coal
12400 Lignite
12500 Residual Oil
12600 Natural Gas
12700 Wood Waste
12800 Solid Waste
1J5000 External Combustion Boilers (Commercial/Industrial)
13100 Anthracite Coal
13200 Bituminous Coal
13300 Subbiturainous Coal
13400 Lignite
13500 Residual Oil
13600 Distillate Oil
13700 Natural Gas
13800 Wood Waste
14000 Internal Combustion - Electrical Generation
14100 Distillate Oil
14200 Natural Gas
14300 Kerosene
15000 Internal Combustion - Industrial
15100 Distillate Oil
15200 Natural Gas
15300 Gasoline
1j5000 Internal Combustion - Commercial
16100 Distillate Oil
16200 Natural Gas
16300 Gasoline
II-9
-------
42000 Vegetative Burning
42100 Woodstoves
42200 Fireplaces
42300 Other
43000 Other
43100 Marine Aerosol
43200 Residential Space Heating
43300 Other
11-12
-------
27000 Stone, Clay, Glass and Concrete
27100 Glass Melting Furnace
27200 Cement Manufacturing
27300 Fugitive Emissions
27400 Lime Production
27500 Gypsum Production
27600 Other
23000 Primary Metals Industries (Ferrous)
28100 Coke Manufacturing
28200 Iron Production .
28300 Steel Production
28400 Ferroallys
28500 Grey Iron Foundries
28600 Steel Foundries
29000 Primary Metals (Non-Ferrous)
29100 Aluminum Reduction
29200 Copper Smelting, Mining & Concentrating
29300 Lead Smelting
29400 Zinc Smelting
30000,. Transportation
31000 Gasoline
31100 Leaded Fuels
31200 Unleaded Fuels
32000 Diesel
32100 Light Duty
32200 Heavy Duty
33000 Composite Profiles
34000 Jet Aircraft
35000 Other
40000. Area Sources
41000 Crustal Sources
41100 Paved Road Dust
41200 Unpaved Road Dust
41300 Soil Dust
41400 Road Sanding & Salting
41500 Railroad Right-of-way Dust
11-11
-------
in the analysis (i.e., was Pb reported for leaded auto exhaust?) and
the degree to which the data is consistent with other data sets from
similar sources. This is the second digit of the ranking value.
3. Documentation
The primary concern here was the adequacy of the data set
documentation in describing the emission/process and chemical
composition of the input materials or fuels. If the document provided
a clear description of the source, it's operating conditions, control
system and the measurement techniques used, the data sets was given a
rating of 3. Those data sets that provided little information on the
process input materials, control or the measurement methods were given
a rating of one. Peer-reviewed literature was consistently rated
more highly than papers that have received less critical review. This
is the third digit of the ranking value.
4. Representativeness
Those source profile that represented results from a single sample
were rated less highly than those that represented the average
composition of a large number of measurements. Profiles consisting of
a single sample were assigned a rating of 1; 2-5 sample received a
rating of 4 while an average of more thatn 5 samples was given a
rating of 8. This is the fourth digit of the ranking value.
The collective ratings of the data sets has been described in the
following terms:
A - Source profiles were obtained using a sound sampling and analytical
methodology. Results are reported in sufficient detail to be of use
to others. These profiles are recommended for use.
B - The tests were performed using a generally sound methodology but lack
sufficient detail or represent too few samples to be used with full
confidence.
C - The source profile reported represent a limited number of samples,
were obtained using uncertain sampling or analytical methods or were
obtained under poorly documented conditions.
11-14
-------
D. Data Ranking Criteria
To insure the source profile data sets included in this document can be
applied by the reader, each of the profiles has been evaluated and rated
as to its overall quality with regard . to its usefulness for receptor
modeling. The data summarized is this document varies from single values
to replicated source tests. Some of the data is provided with complete
descriptions of the sampling methods used, source operating conditions and
analytical methods employed. Other data sets are more poorly documented.
Data sets included in this document, however, do meet the following
criteria:
1 . Test results have been reported in units of weight percent, ug/g or
other units that could be easily converted to a weight percent basis.
2. Data sets which document the control system (if any) associated with
the source.
All of the data sets included in this document have been assigned a
ranking (upper right corner of the profile) based on the following
criteria:
1. Source Testing Method
A key consideration in evaluating the data was the method of sample
collection. Size-resolved stack samples using dilution techniques and
aircraft plume sampling methods were regarded as the most desirable
and received a rating of 3 compared to a rating of 1 for grab samples
from dust collectors. Inclusion of condensible and/or volatile
components in the profile was the single most important criteria.
This is the first digit of the ranking value.
2. Analytical Methods
Principal considerations were the analytical precision of the methods
used (see Table II-3), the completeness of the analysis in explaining
the composition of the aerosol, inclusion of key chemical compoenents
11-13
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUH( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
CONTROLS:
SCC:
SPECIES *********
NAME X BY UT
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
cu
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ -
» -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
» -
V
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+. -
*
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
: EC = ELEMENTAL
COARSE
********* 2.5*10UM ******
% BY UT +- UNC
+ -
» -
+ -
+
+
+
+ -
+
+
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
*
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+
+
+ -
+
+ -
+ .
+
+
+. .
+ -
+
+ -
0.000
CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
TSP
********* <3Q um ******
X BY UT +- UNC
₯
+ -
+ -
*
» -
+
+
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
f -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
= NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :
REF. :
II-6
-------
D - Profiles are based on a poorly documented methodology, were analyzed
using qualitative techniques, represent only a single source sample
and are generally recommended for qualitative use only.
Although the rating system described is subjective, it does provide a
basis for excluding poor data sets. Users interested in further
evaluating the quality of the data can refer to the numerical rating
assigned to the testing, analytical, documentation and representativeness
criteria provided.
E. The Reporting Format
Table 11-5 is an example of the format used in presenting the source
profiles: the date at the upper left indicates the date the profile was
last reviewed and serves as means of easily updating the profiles. Next,
the source name, SCC code and reference emission control of system (if
any) are given. All data reported in this document were taken downstream
from the control system where applicable. In the upper right, the source
profile code, data ranking and ratings are presented. The body of data
beneath the dashed line lists the chemical composition of the emissions,
by particle size group. The column to the far left (species number) is,
with the exception of the carbon and ion components, the atomic number of
the element. Species numbers are used by the Chemical Mass Balance model
to (a) match species included in the ambient aerosol data set to those in
the source profiles and (b) to facilitate processing of the model outputs.
To avoid confusions in processing large data sets, it is critical that a
consistent method of numbering the species be adopted. To that end, it is
highly recommended that the species numbering system noted here be adopted
by the user. Since the report format dimensions limit the number of
species included in these profiles, the following numbering convention
should be used for species not included in Table II-5; (a) other trace
elements - atomic numbers (b) total carbon (200) (c) carbonate ion (205)
and (d) ammonium ion (206). Additional numbers have not been widely
adopted. The chemical composition (weight percent) is presented for the
fine «2.5um), coarse (2.5-10um) and TSP fractions «30pm) where possible.
The associated uncertainties reported may be based on either the estimated
analytical precision of the species (single samples) or the standard
11-15
-------
deviation (10") of the data sets. For those source emissions that are
known to be principally composed of fine particles, the composition of all
three size fractions are assumed to be similar. In these cases,
appropriate notes are included at the bottom of the form or in the
abstract.
The species listed in Table II-5 are those that are most commonly reported
in the literature. For those profiles that include other key species, a
minor component may have been deleted to permit inclusion of a
non-standard component. The reader may therefore find some variability in
the format.
Each entry contains either a reported value, an indication that the
component was found to be below the analytical detection limit «), not
analyzed (NA) or not reported (NR). In many of the cases, uncertainties
in the data were either not known or were not reported by the author.
Following the data tabulation, the percent of aerosol mass accounted for
by the data is presented based on a summation of the species. The sum
does not include oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, water or other components
that were not included in the analysis. If both sulfur and sulfate are
reported, the sulfur component was subtracted from the total to ensure
that the sulfur was not included twice in the summation. Failure to
include the carbonaceous, oxygen and hydrogen components in the aerosol
characterization is often the single largest source of unexplained mass.
Well designed source characterization analytical programs are typically
able to account for at least 50% of the aerosol mass.
Finally, appropriate notes describing the data set, assumption used in
tabulating the data or source characteristics are noted at the bottom of
the page. A brief abstract of the data set, source description and
technical reference follow each profile.
F. Source Profile Uncertainties
The source profile uncertainties are either analytical standard deviations
if the profile is based on the analysis of only one sample; or if they are
11-17
-------
based on more than one sample, the uncertainties are the standard
deviation of the distribution or analytical uncertainty, which ever is
larger. Although it is possible to determine if one or multiple samples
were used in the profile from the ranking code, it is not possible to
determine if multiple samples were obtained from the source or from more
than one source. The standard deviations of the profile distributions
resulting from multiple source measurements are generally greater than
those obtained from a single source. These uncertainties should be used
as a guide when applying these profile values to a specific airshed. The
uncertainty in the relative elemental composition will generally be much
less than the uncertainties in the absolute source composition.
11-18
-------
G. Preparing Source Profile Composites
As more profiles for a given source-type become available the analyst must
choose whether to use one single representative profile or to combine them
into a profile composite. Since a composite is likely to better represent
the average composition of the source emissions, it is advisable to
combine results from several emission tests whenever possible. The
selection of profiles to be included in the composite should be carried
out in three steps: (1) selection of the best profiles, (2) profile
averaging and (3) evaluation of the resultant composite. Each of these
three steps is described below:
Step 1-Profile Selection
When several profiles are available for the same source, the following
criteria can be applied to determine which should be included in the
averaging process:
Rating-When several profiles are rated as either excellent or good,
those profiles rated as "poor" should be excluded from the composite.
Similarity to airshed sources - When information about the source
configuration, feedstocks and operating parameters for sources within
the airshed exist, those profiles which best characterize sources
within the airshed should be selected.
Size fractions and chemical composition-From the remaining profiles,
select those with similiar size fractions and measurement methods to
those used at the airshed receptors.
Uncertainty evaluation-Of the remaining profiles, select those which
have the most realistic uncertainty estimates based on your knowledge
of the sources present within the airshed. The consistency of the
chemical composition of process feedstocks or coal used at a power
generating station are two examples.
Step 2-Profile Compositing
In some cases, it is likely that several source profiles will remain for
which none of the above criteria seem to apply.
11-19
-------
The most accurate profile is then likely to be a combination of the
remaining profiles. Henry (55) has demonstrated that singular values
decomposition statistical methods can be used to produce an optimally
weighted linear combination of source profiles. Unfortunately, this
method requires rather complicated computer algorithms that are still
under development. Also, the variabilities reported in literature are not
necessarily compatible and do not always represent the overall
variability. The best current alternative is to give each of the
remaining profiles an equal weight in the composite, forming a linear
combination of profiles. The composite source matrix elements would then
be as shown below:
* Aijk
k-1
Where: A.. » Composite source matrix element for species "i" in source
"j" emissions
A , = source matrix element for species "i" from source "j" from
profile "k"
The estimated uncertainty is the standard deviation of the values from
each profile:
(2)
k-1
For example, in the case of wood-fired boilers (WFB) profiles A, B and C
Table 11-7 all of the profiles remain after applying the four criteria
described above. Calculate the composite source matrix element for
potassium (K) in the fine particle fraction. The fine potassium values
drawn from these three profiles are 0.190, 0.09 and 0.224, respectively.
Using equations (1) and (2) above, these yield a composite potassium value
and uncertainty of 0.168 and 0.07, respectively:
11-20
-------
TABLE II-6
COMPOSITE PROFILES FOR WOOD FIRED BOILERS AND
MUNICIPAL INCINERATORS
WOOD FIRED BOILERS*
FINE
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % }
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
7.300
NA
0.187
0.833
<
6.300
8.870
16.800
4.500
<
0.013
<
0.012
0.373
0.740
<
0.002
0.072
0,700
<
<
<
<
0,810
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.203
NA
NA
14.900
0.870
63.485
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 5.800
+ - NR
+ 0.055
+ - 0.375
+ - NR
+ - 2.980
+ - 4.480
+ 7.010
+ - 1.400
+ - NR
+ - 0.023
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.158
+ - 0.485
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.047
+ - 0.386
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.199
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 17.20
+ 1.100
WOOD FIRED BOILERS
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
MUNICIPAL INCINERATORS**
TSP
********* <30 UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA *
NA + -
3.430 + -
0.987 * -
0.903 + -
1.750 * -
< *
4.100 +
3.740 + -
11.300 + -
10.400 + -
< + -
0.069 + -
< + -
0.009 + -
0.500 + -
0.997 + -
< +
< -i- -
0.048 «
0.513 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.015 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.115 + -
10.600 + -
13.700 + -
2.500 + -
NA +
65.676
NR
NR
NR
3.230
0.878
1.040
0.770
NR
4.900
2.530
13.40
4.900
NR
0.060
NR
0.010
0.205
0.178
NR
NR
0.029
0.727
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.015
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.178
0.780 '
17.50
1.400
MR
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
9.550 + -
1.420 + -
1.170 « -
< * -
< +
4.300 + -
22.300 + -
5.000 + -
0.767 + -
< +
0.193 + -
0.000 « -
0.036 + -
0.083 + -
0.627 + -
< -i- -
0.014 + -
0.180 + -
11.800 + -
< + -
< + -
0.020 + -
< + -
0.166 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.025 + -
0.115 +
0.885 + -
0.168 + -
0.004 + -
0.007 + -
< + -
5.330 + -
8.230 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
72.390
NR
NR
NR
1.800
1.150
0.590
NR
NR
7.500
4.300
10.00
1.330
NR
0.127
0.001
0.023
0.062
0.286
NR
0.006
0.017
0.350
NR
NR
0.004
NR
0.097
NR
NR
NR
0.023
0.047
0.577
0.078
0.004
0.010
NR
9.230
1.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : * COMPOSITE FROM PROFILES A,B,C OF TABLE II-7.
** COMPOSITE FROM PROFILES D,E,F,G OF TABLE II-7.
11-22
-------
1/3[0.190 + 0.090 + 0.224] (3)
= 0.168 5 16.8% Potassium
- Q/2[ (0.190-0.168) 2+(0.090-0.168) 2+(0. 224-0.168)2J
" 0.0701 s 7.01% Potassium (4)
Table II-6 list the composite source profiles for fine and coarse
wood-fired boiler emission (WFB) (profiles A, B and C) and for total
municipal incinerator emissions (profiles D, E, F, and G). These are the
only two source types within this document for which sufficient data
exists to justify compositing. Several decisions were required in forming
these composites:
Values less than an unreported detection limit were set to zero in
forming the average. If a detection limit is known, one half of this
value was used in calculating the average.
If the majority of the profiles noted that a specie was not analyzed
(NA), then "NA" was reported in the composite for that species. An
alternative is to average all reported species, regardless of their
frequency of occurrence.
In some cases, the uncertainty associated with a species in a single
source profile may be greater than that calculated from Equation 2.
All uncertainties in Table II-6 resulted from Equation 2, however.
The higher uncertainty can be substituted, if desired.
Step 3 - Evaluation
Results from the Step 2 calculations may not be representative of any
of the individual sources which contributed to the composite. While
it is not possible to improve .these results short of emission
characterization sampling within the airshed under study, it is
possible to evaluate the extent to which the composite profile
represents each of it's constituent profiles.
11-21
-------
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
82
201
202
203
204
206
SUM( % }
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
NH4
WOOD FIRED BOILER (COMPOSITE)
1-02-009-02
UNSPECIFIED
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
14.000
NA
0,130
0,500
NA
3.000
13.000
9.000
3.000
NA
<
<
<:
0.200
0.300
NA
<
0.027
0.300
NA
<
<
<
0.017
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.030
5.000
4.300
11.000
2.100
0.160
63.064
OC - ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
+ 0.070
+ - 0.300
+ - NR
+ - 2.000
+ - 12.00
+ - 6.000
+ - 2.000
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ 0.100
+ - NR
+ ' NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 4.000
+ - 4.000
+ - 4.000
+ - 1.800
+ - 0.090
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
7.000
2.000
2.100
1.800
NA
2.000
5.000
6.000
15.000
NA
<
<
<
0.700
1.200
NA
<
NA
0.150
NA
<
<
<
NA
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.004
10.000
26.000
3.500
NA
NA
80.454
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 2.000
+ 0.900
+ - 1.700
* - 0.800
+ NR
+ - 1.000
+ - 7.000
+ 2.000
+ 7.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.300
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.090
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.002
+ - 7.000
+ 16.00
+ - 1.500
+ NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: B
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q (JM ******
% BY WT + UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
4- -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF 3 DIFFERENT TYPES OF BOILERS. REF. 45.
11-24
-------
21-Jun-85
TABLE II-7. Profiles for Wood Fired Boilers and Municipal Incinerators
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD-FIRED BOILER (COMPOSITE)
1-03-009-02
UNSPECIFIED
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
4.500
0.160
0.190
1.240
<
7.100
4.100
19.000
4.900
<
0.040
<
0.020
0.410
0.660
<
<
0.070
1.070
<
<
<
<
0.170
<
<
<
<
0.030
<
<
<
0.300
<
<
0.160
NA
NA
NA
NA
44.120
OC a ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.500
+ - 0.110
+ - 0.180
+ - 0.570
+ - NR
+ - 2.200
+ - 1.800
+ - 1.400
+ 2.600
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.010
+ - 0.310
+ - 0.660
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.450
+ - NR
+ - NR
4- NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.220
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.280
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
2.600
0.500
0.330
2.500
<
9.700
5.400
26.500
10.900
<
0.110
0.010
0.020
0.510
0.870
<
<
0.080
1.350
<
<
<
<
0.030
<
<
<
<
0.060
<
<
<
0.400
<
<
0.320
NA
NA
NA
NA
62.190
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.800
+ - 0.100
+ 0.130
+ - 0.500
+ - NR
+ - 1.100
+ - 0.400
+ - 3.500
* - 1.600
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.010
4- - 0.170
+ - 0.370
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ 0.050
+ - NR
» - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.140
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: A
RANKING: 3324
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
4. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
4. -
+ -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
+ -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COARSE FRACTION IS 2.5 - 15 UM. REF. 42. SAMPLE TAKEN DOWNSTREAM
OF AN UNSPECIFIED CONTROL SYSTEM.
11-23
-------
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
MOTES:
SOURCE: MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR (ALEXANDRIA. VA).
SCC: 5-01-001-01
CONTROLS: BAGHOUSE
FINE COARSE
SPECIE ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME X BY WT + - UNC % BY WT +- UNC
BE + - + -
B + + -
F + - +
NA + - +
MG + + -
AL + - + -
SI + + -
P + - + -
S + - ' + -
CL + + -
K + - + -
CA + + -
SC + - + -
TI + - + -
V + + -
CR + - + -
MN * - + -
FE + »
CO + - + -
NI + - +
CU + + -
ZN + - +
GA + + -
GE + - + -
AS + + -
S£ + - + -
BR + - + -
RB + - + -
SR + - + -
ZR + - + -
AG + - + -
CD * + -
SN + - + -
SB + - + -
CS + - + -
BA + - + -
CE + - + -
HG + - + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - + -
N03 + - + -
0.000 0.000
OC - ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
9.800
0.680
1.600
NA
<
NA
20.000
<
2.300
<
0.290
0.002
0.049
0.150
0.900
<
0.020
0.200
12.000
<
<
0.021
0.002
0.260
<
<
<
0.039
0.110
1.070
0.240
0.003
0.089
0.001
<
9.700
NA
NA
NA
NA
59.526
D
2238
A
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.800
+ - 0.250
+ - 0.800
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 5.000
+ NR
+ - 1.100
+ NR
+ - 0.140
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.035
+ 0.140
+ - 0.330
+ NR
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.120
+ - 6.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.002
+ 0.140
+ - NR
+ - MR
+ - NR
+ 0.036
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.240
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.057
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 2.600
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : MEAN AND STO. DEV. OF 26 TSP SAMPLES. COMPOSITION
COMPARABLE TO OTHER MUNICIPIAL INCINERATORS. REF. 29
11-26
-------
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
s
J
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SOURCE:
iCC:
IONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
sc
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD -FIRED
1-01-009-0
MULT I CLONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
0.150
3.400
<
0.240
0.760
<
8.800
9.500
22.400
5.600
<
<
<
0.015
0.510
1.260
<
0.006
0.120
0.730
<
<
<
<
0.055
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.420
NA
NA
33.800
0.510
79.476
BOILER
2
FINE
<2.5 UM *******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.050
+ - 2.900
+ - 1.000
+ - 0.180
+ - 0.370
+ - NR
+ - 2.400
+ - 4.900
+ 11.200
+ 4.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.340
+ 0.880
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.060
+ 0.340
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.220
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 9.000
+ - 0.230
*********
% BY WT
HA
NA
0.110
0.690
0.460
0.280
0.960
<
0.590
0.830
1.300
5.200
<
0.097
0.005
0.007
0.290
0.920
<
<
0.023
0.039
<
<
<
<
0.001
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.020
11.100
4.300
1.500
0.200
28.332
PROFILE: C
RANKING: 2224
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3g UM ******
*- UNC X BY WT +- UNC
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.041 + -
+ - 0.960 + -
+ - 0.170 + -
+ 0.090 +
+ - 0.140 + -
* - NR + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ 0.760 + -
+ - 0.210 + -
« - 0.520 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.080 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ - 0.040 + -
+ - 0.220 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.005 + -
+ - 0.004 + -
+ 0.005 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
* NR + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
* - 0.003 + -
+ - 5.400 + -
+ - 1.400 +
+ - 0.370 + -
+ - 0.130 + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : COARSE MODE 2.5-20 UM. MEAN AND STD. DEV. FROM
REF: 21 3 TESTS.
11-25
-------
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
SOURCE: MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR - AVERAGE VALUES
SCC: 5-01-005-08
CONTROLS: WET SCRUBBERS & ESP
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
PROFILE: F
RANKING: 2338
RATING : A
FINE COARSE TSP
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q y^ ******
NAME X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC X BY WT +- UNC
BE + - *
B + - + -
F + - + -
NA + - +
MG + - + -
AL + - +
SI + - +
P + - + -
S + - + - '
CL + - + -
K + + -
CA + - +
SC + - + -
TI + - + -
V + - + -
CR + +
MN + - + -
FE + + -
CO + - + -
NI + - + -
CU + - + -
ZN + + -
GA + - + -
GE + - + -
AS + - + -
SE + - + -
BR + - + -
RB + - + -
SR + - + -
ZR + - + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
SN + - +
SB + - + -
CS + - + -
BA + - + -
CE + - + -
HG * - + -
PB + + -
OC + - + -
EC + + -
S04 + - + -
N03 + + -
0.000 0.000
NA + -
NA + -
NA * -
8.200 + -
1.300 + -
1.400 + -
< + -
< + -
< -t-
20.000 -i- -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.240 + -
< + -
0.049 + -
0.073 + -
0.650 + -
< + -
0.015 + -
0.170 + -
12.000 + -
< +
< + -
0.024 + -
0.004 + -
0.150 + -
< + -
< -i-
< + -
0.050 + -
0.150 + -
1.150 + -
0.210 + -
0.006 f -
0.070 + -
< + -
16.000 + -
8.100 + -
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
70.011
NR
NR
NR
1.700
1.300
0.800
NR
NR
NR
7.000
NR
NR
NR
0.160
NR
0.038
0.067
0.290
NR
0.006
0.030
1.000
NR
NR
0.006
0.001
0.100
NR
NR
NR
0.046
0.040
0.120
0.050
0.003
0.042
NR
7.000
1.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES FROM OVER 40 SOURCE
REF:37 TESTS AT THREE INCINERATORS.
11-28
-------
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
74
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
NOTES:
SOURCE: MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR (CHICAGO)
SCC: 5-01-005-08
CONTROLS: WET SCRUBBER
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-1QUM ******
NAME % BY UT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC
BE + + -
B + - +
F + - + -
NA + - +
MG + + -
AL + + -
SI + + -
p + - + -
S + - + -
CL + + -
K + - + -
CA + - + -
SC + - + -
TI + - + -
V + +
CR + - + -
MN + - +
FE + + -
CO + + -
NI + +
cu + - + -
ZN + + -
GA + - + -
GE + - + -
AS + - + -
SE + - +
BR + - + -
RB + + -
SR + + -
ZR + - +
AG + + -
CD ' + - + -
SN + - + -
SB + + -
CS + - + -
BA + - + -
CE + + -
W + +
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + + -
S04 + +
N03 + + -
0.000 0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE:
RANKING: 233
RATING :
TSP
********* <3o UM
% BY WT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA +
8.200 + -
2.800 + -
0.500 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
27.000 +
< + -
< + -
< »
0.050 + -
< + -
0.010 + -
0.027 + -
0.330 + -
< + -
0.008 +
0.170 + -
11.400 + -
< + -
< + -
0.020 + -
< »> -
0.088 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.011 + -
0.150 + -
1.290 + -
0.160 + -
0.008 + -
0.022 + -
< + -
8.000 + -
6.900 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
67.144
NR = NOT REPORTED
E
8
A
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
1.300
0.800
NR
NR
NR
NR
3.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.002
0.008
0.150
NR
0.003
0.030
2.800
NR
NR
0.009
NR
0.039
NR
NR
NR
0.008
0.040
0.160
0.080
0.003
0.013
NR
NR
1.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AL, TI AND W VALUES APPROXIMATE.
REF:37
MEAN AND STD. DER. OF 11 SAMPLES.
11-27
-------
If a source with profile B or C had impacted the receptor would have
been:
Cn - (.09) (5.0) + (.05) (5.0) + (.0259) (5.0) + (.00251) (5.0) (7)
B
C » 0.842 ug/m3 Potassium
(.225) (5.0)+ (.05) (5.0) + (.0259) (5.0) + (.00251) (5.0) (8)
C - 1.52 ug/m3 Potassium
This procedure can be followed for each of the mass balance fitting
species.
3.3. Perform a mass balance calculation on each set of simulated
concentrations using the composite source profile. For example,
the results of three mass balances for fine and coarse
wood-fired boilers and three of the municipal incinerators are
given in Table II-6. The percent measurement uncertainties are
assumed for the ambient concentrations. Source profiles from
Table II-7 were assumed to have 10% uncertainties. The
composites from Table II-6 were assumed to have the
uncertainties reported in the table.
3.4 Compare the S . +_ (T . interval calculated with the composite
3 s J
profile to the "true" S. values used to generate the simulated
data. If most of the "true" values fall outside of the
uncertainty interval,then the composite profile cannot be
considered to be an accurate representation of the individual
profiles from which it was derived.
11-32
-------
Table II-8
Soil and Motor Vehicle Exhaust
Source Profiles (Percent)
Species
Al
Si
Cl
K
Ca
Ti
V
Cr
Mn
Fe
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
Soils
8.130
27.700
0.013
2.59
3.630
0.440
0.0135
0.010
0.095
5.000
0.0075
0.0055
0.0070
0.00025
0.0013
Motor Vehicles
0.251
0.835
1.340
0.251
2.090
0.008
0.000
0.0008
0.134
0.501
0.000
0.0585
0.0668
9.350
20.000
11-31
-------
The following procedure, devised by Watson and Robinson (57)
illustrates how this can be accomplished:
3.1. Select a set of sources, their typical contributions,
measured species and source profiles which are typical of the
modeling application. For example, an airshed contains four
sources-soil dust, motor vehicle exhaust, a municipal
incinerator and a wood-fired boiler. For simplicity, assume
that each source contributes 5 ug/m3 to a 20 ug/m3 ambient
sample. Assume that receptor measurements made for Al, Si,
Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn,Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br and Pb. Table
II-8 shows the composition of soil and motor vehicle exhaust.
3.2. Generate a set of simulated chemical concentrations. For
each individual source profile which was included in the
composite using the fundamental mass balance equation:
For example, in the case of fine fraction potassium, A . equal to
0,05 (incinerator), 0.0259 (soils) and 0.00251 (vehicles) are drawn
from Tables II-6 and II-8. Values of 0.19, 0.09 and 0.225 are the
fine potassium source matrix elements for profiles A, B, and C
respectively. If a wood-fired boiler with a composition similiar to
profile A were impacting the receptor, the measured potassium
concentration would be:
CK,A = <-19) <5'°) + (-05) (5.0) + (.0259) (5.0) + (.00251) (5.0) (6)
CK,A = 1>3^ ug/m3 Potassium
11-30
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
TABLE II-7 (Cont'd)
SOURCE: MUNICIPAL REFUSE INCINERATION -COMPOSITE PROFILE: G
SCC: 5-01-001-01 RANKING: 1324
CONTROLS: ESP AND MULT I CLONES RATING : C
FINE COARSE TSP
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3(j UM
NUMBER NAME % BY WT + - UNC % BY WT +- UNC % BY WT +-
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE +
B + -
F + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL » -
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL +
K + -
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR + -
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI + -
CU + -
ZN + -
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR + -
RB + -
SR + -
ZR + -
AG + -
CD + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG + -
PB + -
OC *
EC +
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
+ - NA + -
+ NA + -
+ NA + -
+ 12.000 + -
* - < +
t- - 0.420 + -
+ < + -
+ < + -
+ - 13.000 + -
+ - 27.000 + -
+ - 20.000 + -
+ - 1.100 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ 0.085 + -
+ 0.033 + -
+ - 0.610 + -
+ - 0.002 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.360 + -
+ - 2.600 + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.015 + -
+ - < + -
+ 0.082 + -
+ - 0.260 + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.050 + -
+ - 0.030 + -
+ - 0.061 + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 1.700 + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA + -
0.000 66.501
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 50.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
11-29
-------
F. n. - Mass fraction < 1.0 urn in source "j" emissions
-L. Uj
FO _ . a Mass fraction < 2.5 urn in source "j" emissions
i. jj
F* n.i * Ma88 fraction < 6.0 urn in source "j" emissions
O. Uj
F .. j. * Mass fraction < 10.0 |im in source "j" emissions
For example, AP-42 size distribution data for wood-fired boilers
yields the following information:
, ... = .113 (11.3%) F- _. - 0.378 (37.8%)
l.Oj 2.5j
. rt. = .719 (71.9%) F,n n. = 0.842 (84.2%)
D.Uj 1U.Uj
2. Calculate the PM. _ source composition from:
/F "\ / F "s
[ 2.5j) A. 2.5,-n
A =\F /A +lF ) A
ijlO vioj/ Hijfine \ 10j y ij coarse (9)
Where: AJ.J^Q * the PM1Q source composition matrix element for species
"i" in source "j"
11-34
-------
More precise source measurements may then be necessary before a
meaningful composite can be developed. For example, the second
column intervals for data sets generated from profiles B and C
contain the "true" values. This composite will therefore yield
incorrect results when used in most mass balance applications.
All of the "true" municipal incinerator emission compositions,
however, do fall within the calculated composite interval,
indicating that this composite would be representative of any of
it's contributing components.
This procedure does not necessarily produce the best composite
profile. It does, however, give the user an objective means of
evaluating the extent to which the composite represents the
individual component parts.
H. Calculation PM^0 Source Profiles
Many of the source profiles reported in this document are
separated into fine (0-2.5 um) and coarse (2.5-10 urn) size
fractions.
These data sets are directly applicable to receptor modeling
studies utilizing dichotomous samplers. When the fine and
coarse fraction chemical compositions from a single source type
differ substantially from each other, a method of combining the
fine and coarse profiles must be found if the data is to be used
for PM 1 n source apportionment studies. This can be done if
the particle size distribution of the emissions is known. Many
of these size distributions are being developed by the
Environmental Protection Agency and will be reported in
subsequent AP-42 publications as the fraction of total mass less
than 1.0,2.5,6.0 and 10.0 um. These distributions can be used
to calculate PM1(, emission compositions given fine and coarse
profiles using the following procedure:
1. Find the FT n., F F and F fractions .
l.Oy 2.5j 6.0j 10. Oj
in AP-42 for the source type "j" where:
11-33
-------
Since they are not reported, assume that:
'1 F2.5WFB and °FIO,WFB = °'1 FIO,WFB
Then:
CTa,k,10, Wood
.842
(-0378)
[(.569 + .569 + 9.875 + .257
.257 + 36.188) x 10 " ' l/2
0.0689
(.168)2 (.0842)2
(12)
Notice that the terms containing F and F are negligible in
/.jj luj
this case and could have been ignored. This will not always be the
case, however. This method is specific for the 2.5 and 2.5-10 urn
size fractions, but if the fine and coarse source measurements are in
different size fractions, it will still apply if the appropriate F..
are supplied. For example, if the source tests had separated the
sizes at 1 um, then the 1 micron fraction F n would have
J.. U j
substituted for 2.5 micron fraction F
2.5J-
11-36
-------
A. .Fine = The fine source composition matrix element for ij fine
species "i" in source "j" contained in this library.
A .Coarse = The coarse source composition matrix element for ij
coarse species "i" in source "j" contained in the
library.
For example, to calculate the _ source composition for potassium, Table
II-6 shows that ^ m^, Fine « 0.168 and AR ^g, coarse » 0.113
substituting these values into Equation 9 yields.
A 1Q - (.3787.842).168 + (1 - .3787.842).113 (10)
3. Calculate the uncertainty of the matrix element by propagation
of errors ic'quadrature:
_ ,1/2
For the case of potassium in wood-fired boilers (WFB), Table II-6
shows that:
IT = 0.07 and (T = 0.134
k,WFB,fine k,WFB,coarse
11-35
-------
A. Combustion Sources
Profiles within the 10000 series include those associated with external and
internal combustion sources for power generation, process heat and solid
waste disposal.
III-A
-------
III. SOURCE EMISSION PROFILES
The following set of tables describes the chemical composition of source
emissions. The profiles are arranged by source group into four primary
categories: combustion sources, industrial process losses, transportation and
area sources. To locate a profile, the reader should first refer to Table
II-4, Source Profile Codes (page 11-12) to note the 5-digit code assigned to
the source group of interest. Note that the individual profiles within each
source group are numbered sequentially. Review the reference abstract to
select the profile you feel is best for your specific application. All of the
profiles are organized in numerical order within this chapter.
III-l
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE | REFERENCE | SOURCE | REFERENCE
NUMBER I NUMBER | GROUP |
11201
11201
11201
11201
11201
11201
11201
11201
52 |COAL-FIRE|J.E. HOWES, J. A. COOPER AND J.E.
(UTILITY | HOUCK, "SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE
(BOILER (SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA,"
| IDRAFT FINAL REPORT TO us EPA ENVIRON.
j (SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP, N.C. BY NEA,
| | INC. (1983)
1 1
1 1
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
1
(PHILADELPHIA BITUMINOUS COAL- FIRED POWER
(PLANT BOILER STACK WITH ESP CONTROLS. PLANT
(OPERATING AT FULL CAPACITY (300 MW).
(DILUTION TRAIN SAMPLES. REPRESENTATIVE
(SAMPLE FROM A SET OF 9. XRF ANALYSIS WITH
(ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTIES.
1
1
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COAL- FIRED POWER PLANT
1-01-002-01
ESP
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
15.679
23.837
0.620
3.305
0.094
1.304
1.235
<
0.967
0.079
0.058
0.043
8.491
<
0.049
0.031
0.069
0.027
<
0.081
0.036
0.000
0.009
0.124
0.076
0.022
0.012
0.000
NR
<
0.000
<
0.000
0.036
NA
NA
NA
NA
56.284
FINE
<2.5 UH ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.789
+ - 1.192
+ - 0.114
+ - 0.180
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.069
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ 0.050
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.004
* - 0.003
+ 0.428
+ - NR
+ 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.003
+ 0.007
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.098
+ NR
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
14.205 + -
22.872 + -
0.279 + -
0.656 +
0.102 + -
1.436 +
1.514 * -
< + -
1.008 + -
0.066 + -
0.051 + -
0.046 + -
9.524 + -
< + -
0.032 + -
0.027 + -
0.045 + -
0.021 + -
< + -
0.036 + -
0.005 + -
0.000 +
0.012 + -
0.159 + -
0.035 + -
0.002 * -
0.000 + -
0.011 + -
NR + -
< + -
0.098 + -
< + -
< + -
0.025 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
52.267
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.742
1.191
0.060
0.043
0.013
0.076
0.080
NR
0.053
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.496
NR
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
NR
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.009
0.007
0.004
0.006
0.008
NR
NR
0.040
NR
0.003
0.003
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 11201
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3(j UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
+. .
+
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :BITUMINOUS COAL. REF. 52.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
11801
21 (WOOD- |J.E. CORE, "WILLAMETTE VALLEY FIELD AND
|FIRED (SLASH BURNING IMPACT AIR QUALITY
(BOILER (SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; VOLUME 3," STATE OF
(OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
((1979). TABLE 5.2.3.
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THIS STUDY WERE
(TAKEN USING A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR (2.5
|UM, D50) ADAPTED FOR SOURCE TESTING. THE
(SAMPLING TRAIN INCLUDED PROVISION FOR
(DILUTION AIR TO CAPTURE CONDENSIBLES.
(COARSE FRACTION APPROXIMATELY 20 UM, D50.
(SAMPLES ANALYZED BY XRF (5 ELEMENTS), ION
(CHROMATOGRAPHY AND CARBON OXIDATION. THE
|PACS PROFILE SET WAS SUPPLEMENTED WITH TEST
(OF STREET AND SOIL DUST, CHARCOAL MFG, HOG
(FUEL BOILERS AND SILICA MFG AS PART OF THIS
|STUDY. F, NA AND MG WATER SOLUBLE IONS.
(AVERAGE AND STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES OF 3
(SOURCE TESTS OF A 35,000 LB STEAM PER HOUR
(OUTPUT HOGGED FUEL BOILER (DUTCH OVEN).
(SAMPLE TAKEN DOWNSTREAM FROM MULT I CLONE
(CONTROL SYSTEM. FUEL IS DOUGLAS FIR BARK
(AND WOOD. APPROX. 20% OF MASS <20 UM.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
s
s
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SOURCE:
!CC:
IONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
Tl
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD-FIRED BOILER
1-01-009-02
MULT I CLONE
FINE
********* <2>5 UM
X BY WT + -
NA +
NA + -
0.150 + -
3.400 + -
< + -
0.240 + -
0.760 + -
< + -
8.800 + -
9.500 + -
22.400 + -
5.600 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.015 + -
0.510 + -
1.260 + -
< + -
0.006 + -
0.120 +
0.730 + -
< + -
< + -
< *
< + -
0.055 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< +
< +
0.420 + -
NA + -
NA + -
33.800 + -
0.510 + -
79.476
******
UNC
NR
NR
0.050
2.900
1.000
0.180
0.370
NR
2.400
4.900
******
4.000
NR
0.060
0.002
0.006
0.340
0.880
NR
0.004
0.060
0.340
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.030
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.220
NR
NR
9.000
0.230
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.110
0.690
0.460
0.280
0.960
<
0.590
0.830
1.300
5.200
<
0.097
0.005
0.007
0.290
0.920
<
<
0.023
0.039
<
<
<
<
0.001
<:
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.020
11.100
4.300
1.500
0.200
28.332
PROFILE: 11801
RANKING: 2224
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3o UH ******
+- UNC X BY WT +- UNC
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.041 + -
+ - 0.960 + -
+ - 0.170 + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ - 0.140 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ - 0.760 + -
+ - 0.210 +
+ - 0.520 * -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.080 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ 0.040 + -
+ - 0.220 + -
* - NR +
+ - 0.005 + -
+ - 0.004 + -
+ 0.005 +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR * -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.003 + -
+ 5.400 + -
+ - 1.400 + -
+ - 0.370 + -
+ - 0.130 + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : COARSE MODE 2.5-20 UM. MEAM AND STD. DEV. FROM
REF: 21 3 TESTS.
-------
13-Jun-B5
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
2R
MO
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
OIL-FIRED POWER PLANT
1-01-004-01
MECHANICAL COLLECTOR
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.468
2.512
1.012
11.027
0.000
0.217
2.353
<
0.129
1.504
0.051
0.039
2.043
<
2.036
NR
1.095
0.010
<
0.008
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.031
0.003
0.169
0.002
0.019
0.074
<
0.219
<
0.000
1.423
NA
NA
NA
NA
27.454
+ - NR
+ NR
* NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.068
+ 0.115
+ - 0.184
+ - 0.513
+ - 0.129
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.110
+ - NR
+ - 0.129
+ - 0.069
+ - 0.090
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.094
+ - NR
+ - 0.093
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.002
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.002
+ - 0,004
+ 0.008
+ - 0.003
+ 0.005
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ 0.025
+ - NR
+ 0.001
+ - 0.065
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
10.126 + -
20.321 +
2.484 + -
9.718 + -
0.000 * -
0.386 + -
10.805 + -
< + -
1.122 + -
1.944 + -
0.127 +
0.069 + -
3.715 + -
< + -
1.208 +
NR + -
0.710 + -
0.030 + -
< + -
0.022 + -
0.000 + -
0.010 + -
0.000 + -
0.159 + -
0.166 + -
0.085 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.230 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< -I- -
0.000 + -
0.422 +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
63.859
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.992
1.909
1.140
2.498
0.601
0.386
1.141
NR
0.110
0.370
0.050
0.015
0.578
NR
0.422
NR
0.231
0.015
NR
0.053
0.010
0.009
0.007
0.020
0.047
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.145
NR
0.358
NR
0.012
0.278
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 11501
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
11501
11501
11501
11501
11501
11501
11501
11501
52 |OIL-FIRED|J.E. HOWES,J.A.COOPER AND J.E.
[UTILITY |HOUCK,"SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE
|BOILER [SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA,1
| [DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO US EPA ENVIRON.
| {SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP, N.C. BY NEA,
| |INC.(1983)
IOIL-FIRED POWER PLANT EQUIPPED WITH
[MECHANICAL COLLECTOR CONTROLS BURNING NO. 6
[FUEL OIL. 460 MW OUTPUT DURING SAMPLE
(COLLECTION. SAMPLED WITH A DILUTION TRAIN.
(PROFILE REPRESENTS A SINGLE TYPICAL SAMPLE
(SELECTED FROM A GROUP OF 9. XRF DATA WITH
(ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTIES.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MM
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CO
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD FIRED BOILER
1-02-009-02
WET SCRUBBER
X BY WT
0.020
0.250
1.600
7.260
1.140
1.410
0.910
0.760
2.600
20.400
16.300
3.700
0.048
0.005
0.008
0.340
0.980
0.060
0.005
0.037
0.640
0.028
0.002
0.181
0.045
0.035
0.008
0.025
0.004
0.007
0.002
0.010
0.013
0.024
0.055
0.065
0.004
0.206
1.300
5.600
4.600
7.000
0.085
77.772
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ 0.020
+ 0.130
+ 0.400
+ - 0.730
+ 0.114
+ - 0.990
+ - 0.550
+ - 0.250
+ - 0.260
+ - 2.200
+ 3.300
+ - 2.100
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.006
+ 0.002
+ - 0.170
+ - 0.430
+ - 0.060
+ 0.005
+ - 0.007
+ 0.210
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.008
+ 0.013
+ - 0.004
+ 0.007
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.013
+ 0.034
+ - 0.055
+ 0.065
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.033
+ 1.300
+ 0.600
+ - 0.600
+ 1.100
+ 0.085
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
» - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE: 12704
RANKING: 3324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UH ******
% BY UT + UNC
NA +
NA + -
2.275 + -
NA + -
NA + -
1.603 + -
1.175 + -
0.856 +
2.742 + -
19.530 + -
15.505 + -
4.120 + -
0.056 +
0.009 + -
0.009 +
0.373 + -
1.071 + -
NA + -
0.005 + -
0.033 + -
0.601 + -
0.025 + -
0.002 + -
0.175 + -
0.045 + -
0.040 + -
0.011 + -
0.030 + -
0.006 + -
0.010 + -
0.007 + -
0.015 + -
0.019 + -
0.029 + -
0.087 + -
0.103 + -
0.005 + -
0.210 + -
NA + -
7.070 + -
4.450 + -
7.285 +
0.134 + -
69.721
NR
NR
0.378
NR
NR
0.857
0.470
0.213
0.274
2.152
2.990
1.793
0.018
0.005
0.002
0.145
0.366
NR
0.004
0.006
0.179
0.006
0.002
0.020
0.005
0.014
0.008
0.031
0.004
0.007
0.018
0.011
0.013
0.045
0.062
0.073
0.003
0.031
NR
0.858
0.536
0.982
0.095
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARSON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 49.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFIIE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
12704 | 49 (WOOD- (J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH, (AVERAGE OF THREE REPLICATE SAMPLES FROM A
12704 | (FIRED | SEATTLE-TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION [SINGLE HOGGED FUEL BOILER STACK. STACK
12704 | (BOILER (STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO THE PUGET SOUND (EQUIPPED WITH A WET SCRUBBER. SAMPLES
12704 | ( (AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA.INC. 1983. (COLLECTED WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER EQUIPPED
12704 | | | (WITH A TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR,
12704 ((I I
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE | REFERENCE [REFERENCE ABSTRACT |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP | | |
I
17105 | 52 (MUNICIPALISE. HOWES,J.A.COOPER AND J.E. (PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR EQUIPPED |
17105 | (INCINER. (HOUCK,"SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE (WITH ESP CONTROLS WHICH WERE NOT OPERATIONAL |
17105 | | (SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA," (AT THE TIME OF SAMPLING. SAMPLES COLLECTED |
17105 | | (DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO US EPA ENVIRON. |WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER. A REPRESENTATIVE |
17105 | | (SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP, N.C. BY NEA, (SAMPLE FROM A GROUP OF 10. XRF ANALYSIS AND |
17105 | | | INC.(1983) (ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTIES. |
17105 (II | |
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
MO
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR (PHILADELPHIA)
6-01-001-01
ESP( INOPERATIVE)
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.819
1.442
0.543
1.906
21.299
6.464
0.223
<
0.012
0.000
0.015
0.018
0.279
<
0.032
0.148
11.503
0.016
<
0.000
0.003
0.563
0.016
0.009
0.000
0.036
0.284
0.829
0.442
<
0.020
<
0.009
8.116
NA
NA
NA
NA
55.046
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.117
+ - 0.067
+ - 0.098
* - 0.301
+ - 0.985
+ 0.305
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ 0.003
+ - 0.001
+ 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ 0.013
+ NR
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.525
+ - 0.011
+ - NR
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.027
+ 0.002
+ 0.002
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.041
+ 0.028
+ - NR
+ - 0.029
* - NR
+ - 0.004
* - 0.371
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.827
8.570
0.894
3.487
16.678
4.491
5.870
<
1.097
0.024
0.111
0.091
1.874
<
0.085
0.053
4.012
0.000
<
0.000
0.003
0.375
0.005
0.023
0.000
0.003
0.024
0.004
0.086
<
0.000
<
0.011
2.428
NA
NA
NA
NA
56.126
PROFILE: 17105
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM ******
+- UNC X BY WT +- UNC
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.466 +
+ 0.581 + -
+ - 0.299 + -
+ 0.601 + -
+ - 2.218 + -
+ 0.640 + -
+ - 0.381 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.069 + -
+ - 0.008 + -
+ - 0.009 + -
+ - 0.008 + -
+ - 0.129 +
+ - NR + -
+ 0.010 +
+ - 0.015 + -
+ 0.918 +
+ - 0.022 + -
* - NR + -
+ - 0.071 + -
+ - 0.020 + -
+ 0.057 + -
+ - 0.008 + -
+ - 0.008 +
+ 0.039 + -
+ - 0.023 +
+ - 0.049 + -
+ - 0.089 + -
+ - 0.113 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.242 +
+ - NR +
+ - 0.012 + -
+ - 0.633 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGAMIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 52.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER jGROUP f
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
13501
46 (RESIDUAL |J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
|OIL [RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
|FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
(IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
[GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
I
[PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
[WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
|(2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
|NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
[UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDAT ION(CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
|SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
[SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
(AVERAGE OF 8 SAMPLES OF RESIDUAL OIL
[COMBUSTION EMISSIONS FROM SCHOOLS,
(HOSPITALS, APARTMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL BOILERS.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
sec
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
2N
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
RESIDUAL OIL COMBUSTION (COMMERCIAL)
1-03-004-01
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
0.053
3.500
<
0.530
0.960
<
13.300
<
0.280
1.580
<
0.110
3.440
0.047
0.046
2.970
<
5.360
0.075
0.400
<
<
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.110
7.800
2.420
48.100
0.650
91.744
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 1.700
+ - 3.000
+ - 0.240
+ - 0.480
+ - NR
+ 2.400
+ - 0.100
+ 0.100
+ - 0.640
+ - NR
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.750
+ - 0.015
* 0.013
+ 0.610
+ - NR
+ - 1.210
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.021
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ 6.200
+ 2.500
+ - 11.90
+ - 0.440
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.052
3.500
<
0.530
0.960
<
13.300
<
0.280
1.580
<
0.110
3.440
0.047
0.046
2.970
<
5.360
0.075
0.400
<
<
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.110
7.800
2.420
48.100
0.650
91.743
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
t- - 0.019
+ - 1.700
+ - 3.000
+ - 0.240
+ - 0.480
+ - NR
+ - 2.400
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.640
+ - NR
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.750
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.610
+ - NR
+ 1.210
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.021
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ - 6.200
+ - 2.500
+ - 11.90
+ - 0.440
PROFILE: 13501
RANKING: 2328
RATING : A
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ .
f -
+ -
*
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46.
NA
NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE | REFERENCE {REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP | |
17106 |COMPOSITE|MUNICIPAL|COMPOSITE PROFILE CALCULATED FROM PROFILES j
17106 | IINCINER. (17101,17102,17103 AND 17104. |
17106 III I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE: MUNICIPAL INCINERATOR COMPOSITE
SCC: 6-01-001-01
CONTROLS: ESP.BAGHOUSE AND SCRUBBERS
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME X BY WT + UNC X BY WT + UNC
BE + + -
B + - +
F + - + -
NA + + -
MG + - + -
AL + - + -
SI + - +
p + - » -
s + + -
CL + - +
K + - +
CA + - + -
SC + - + -
TI + - + -
V + - + -
CR + - + -
MN + - + -
FE + - + -
CO + - +
NI + - + -
CU + + -
ZN + - +
GA + - + -
GE + - + -
AS + + -
SE + +
8R + - +
RB + - + -
SR + + -
ZR + - + -
AG + - +
CD + - + -
SN + - +
SB + + -
CS + - * -
8A + + -
CE + - * -
HG + + -
P8 + - * -
OC + - * -
EC + - + -
S04 + + -
N03 + - +
0.000 0.000
OC - ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 17106
RANKING: 3321
RATING: B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA +
9.550 + -
1.420 + -
1.170 + -
< + -
< + -
4.300 +
22.300 + -
5.000 + -
0.767 + -
< + -
0.193 + -
0.000 + -
0.036 + -
0.083 + -
0.627 + -
< + -
0.014 +
0.180 + -
11.800 +
< + -
< + -
0.020 + -
< + -
0.166 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.025 + -
0.115 + -
0.885 + -
0.168 + -
0.004 + -
0.007 +
< + -
5.330 + -
8.230 +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
72.390
NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
1.800
1.150
0.590
NR
NR
7.500
4.300
10.0
1.330
NR
0.127
0.001
0.023
0.062
0.286
NR
0.006
0.017
0.350
NR
NR
0.004
NR
0.097
NR
NR
NR
0.023
0.047
0.577
0.078
0.004
0.010
NR
9.230
1.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
NOTES: ** COMPOSITE FROM PROFILES D.E.F.G OF TABLE II-7.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
19101 |
19101 |
19101 |
19101 |
19101
43 (COPPER |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
| INCINERA- (APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
|TOR (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, inc.
(SCRAP COPPER INCINERATOR STACK. PLUME
(SAMPLE COLLECTED WITH LOW-VOLUME SAMPLER.
(INCINERATION OF MACHINERY OIL AND PLASTIC
(INSULATION FROM COPPER SCRAP.
I
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
<
c
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SOURCE: SCRAP COPPER INCINERATOR
iCC: 3-04-002-09
:ONTROLS: NONE
FINE
SPECIE ********* <2.5 UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC
BE + -
B + -
F + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL + -
SI + -
P + -
S +
CL +
K + -
CA + -
SC + -
TI * -
V + -
CR + -
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI +
CU + -
ZN + -
GA +
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR +
RB + -
SR + -
ZR + -
AG +
CD + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG + -
PB » -
OC +
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
COARSE
********* 2.5-1QUM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
«. .
+
+
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
*
+ -
₯ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
» -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
( -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+. -
+ -
+ -
0.000
PROFILE: 19101
RANKING: 3321
RATING : D
TSP
********* <30 UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + NR
NA + NR
NA * NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.115 + - 0.011
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
0.071 + NR
< « - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< +"- NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
0.186
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : INCINERATION OF MACHINING OIL AND PLASTIC INSULATIN FROM COPPER SCRAP.
REF. 43.
-------
B. Industrial Process Losses
Profiles assigned to the 20000 series are those associated with
industrial fugitive and process losses.
Ill- B
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
20101
10 (ALUMINUM |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA,J.F. MACKO AND N.
(SMELTER IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"ICVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(SECONDARY ALUMINUM SMELTER USING A 35 TON
(REVERBATORY FURNACE MELTING SCRAP WITH
(ALLOYING COMPONENTS, CU.MG.SI. NO EMISSION
(CONTROLS GAS FIRED . PRODUCING CASTING
(BILLET FOR EXTRUSION. AVERAGE VALUES FOR 2
(TESTS.
|ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
[HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
|OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
[DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
IORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS1 KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
ALUMINUM FOUNDRY -RE VERB. FURNACE
3-04-001-01
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
<
<
<
11.000
0.550
3.000
<
0.050
<
0.050
0.550
6.000
0.050
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
13.000
NA
16.000
0.550
51.550
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
f - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
f - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ m
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
<
<
<
11.000
0.550
3.000
<
0.050
<
0.050
0.550
6.000
0.050
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
13.000
NA
16.000
0.550
51.550
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
<
<
<
11.000
0.550
3.000
<
0.050
<
0.050
0.550
6.000
0.050
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
13.000
NA
16.000
0.550
51.550
20101
1121
D
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - . NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : OTHER COMPONENTS, PRINCIPALLY AL203, 51%. ALL SIZE FRACTIONS
REF: 10 ESTIMATED TO BE SIMILAR. POOR QUALITY DATA.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
20102
20102
20102
20102
20102
20102
20102
52 |SECONDARY|J.E. HOWES,J.A.COOPER AND J.E. (ROTARY DROSS RECOVERY FURNACE WITH BAGHOUSE
(ALUMINUM |HOUCK,"SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE (CONTROL SYSTEM. SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH
| (SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA," (DILUTION SAMPLING TRAIN. XRF ANALYSIS WITH
| (DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO US EPA ENVIRON.
| (SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP, N.C. BY NEA,
| |INC.(1983)
(ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTIES.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
OJ
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SECONDARY ALUMINUM PLANT-DROSS RECOVERY FURNACE
3-04-001-07
BAGHOUSE
*********
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.447
6.412
0.373
2.833
23.212
10.035
0.079
<
0.025
0.006
0.028
0.010
0.251
<
0.033
0.042
0.079
0.000
<
0.011
0.016
0.065
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.020
0.000
0.047
0.597
<
0.036
<
0.000
0.079
NA
NA
NA
NA
45.797
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.082
+ - 0.315
+ - 0.068
+ - 0.156
+ - 1.139
+ - 0.490
+ - 0.030
+ NR
+ 0.003
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.003
+ 0.002
+ - 0.015
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.004
+ 0.005
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.068
+ - NR
* - 0.113
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.009
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
4.857 + -
11.501 + -
0.374 + -
1.959 + -
17.746 + -
10.295 + -
0.764 + -
< + -
0.112 + -
0.010 + -
0.063 + -
0.037 + -
1.319 + -
< + -
0.052 * -
0.104 + -
0.202 + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.005 + -
0.013 +
0.039 + -
0.000 + -
0.003 +
0.039 « -
0.061 * -
0.083 + -
0.000 +
0.353 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.094 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
50.085
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.447
1.055
0.114
0.261
1.875
1.017
0.090
NR
0.015
0.005
0.009
0.007
0.120
NR
0.010
0.014
0.022
0.004
NR
0.014
0.005
0.009
0.007
0.009
0.044
0.043
0.057
0.079
0.162
NR
0.347
NR
0.010
0.023
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 20102
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
* .
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+
+ .
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 52.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
20401 |
20401 |
20401 |
20401 [
20401 |
20401 |
20401 I
23 (LEAD |J.E. HOWES,U.M.HENRY AND R.N.
[SMELTER |PESUT,"EVALUATION OF STATIONARY SOURCE
| (PARTICIPATE MEASUREMENTS METHODS-VOLUME V,
| (SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS," US EPA
| |600/2-79-116 (1979). TABLES 5 AND 6.
| 77 TON/DAY SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER BLAST
|FURNACE FED WITH COKE, CAST IRON SCRAP,
(BATTERIES, LIMESTONE, SLAG AND DROSSES.
(PRODUCING 4800 LB/SHIFT. SAMPLES OBTAINED BY
(ISOKINETIC METHOD 5 DOWNSTREAM OF A
IBAGHOUSE.ANALYSIS BY OPTICAL EMISSION SPEC
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE: SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER - BLAST FURNACE
SCC: 3-04-004-03
CONTROLS: BAGHOUSE
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME X BY WT + - UNC % BY WT +- UNC
BE + + -
B + +
r + - + -
NA » - + -
MG + + -
AL " + - «
SI + - + -
P + - + -
S + - + -
CL + - + -
K + - + -
CA * - + -
SC + +
TI + - +
V + - + -
CR + - + -
MN + + -
FE + - +
CO + + -
NI + - * -
CU * - + -
ZN + + -
GA + +
GE + - + -
AS + + -
SE + - + -
BR + - + -
RB + + -
SR + - + -
ZR + + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
SN + - + -
SB + - + -
CS + - + -
BA + + -
CE + + -
HG + + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + > -
S04 + + -
N03 + - + -
0.000 0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 0.15X C; SEMI QUANTITATIVE DATA. REF. 23.
PROFILE: 20401
RANKING: 2121
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3o UM
X BY WT +
< + -
< * -
< * -
3.000 + -
0.001 +
0.003 + -
0.300 + -
0.050 +
< +
19.300 +
1.000 + -
0.030 + -
< + -
< + -
0.001 + -
, 0.001 + -
0.003 +
0.100 + -
< + -
0.001 + -
0.030 + -
0.300 + -
< + -
< + -
0.300 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
0.700 +
2.000 + -
0.200 + -
< + -
< + -
< * -
< + -
50.000 + -
NA + -
NA +
7.530 + -
NA + -
84.850
NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE | REFERENCE | SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
20501
20501
20501
20501
20501
20501
20501
43 |ZINC |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(OXIDE (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(KILN (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
I
|DUCT EMISSIONS FOR ZINC OXIDE KILN.
(MOISTURE AND CARSON (PULVERIZED COAL)
(REMOVED FROM ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED FROM FUNING
(SLAG FROM A LEAD BLAST FURNACE. SAMPLE
|COLLECTED AT POINT OF DUCT DISCHARGE WITH A
|LOW-VOLUME SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
46
47
48
50
51
56
49
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
NOTES:
SOURCE: ZINC OXIDE KILN
SCC: 3-04-999-99
CONTROLS: UNKNOWN
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC % BY WT + UNC
BE + +
B + - + -
F + - +
NA + - +
MG + - + -
AL + - ' +
SI f - +
P + - + -
S + +
CL + + -
K + - + -
CA + - + -
SC + - +
TI + - + -
V + - +
CR + - + -
MN + - +
FE + + -
CO + * -
NI + - + -
CU + - +
ZN + - +
GA + - + -
GE + - +
AS + + -
SE + - + -
BR + - + -
RB + + -
SR + - + -
PO + - + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
SN + + -
SB + - + -
BA + - + -
IN + - + -
CE + - + -
HG * - + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - *
N03 + - + -
0.000 0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 2050
RANKING: 332
RATING :
TSP
********* <30 UM
% BY WT +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.423 + -
0.574 + -
0.188 + -
3.290 + -
0.427 + -
0.615 +
0.231 + -
< + -
0.031 + -
0.011 + -
0.018 + -
0.021 + -
0.188 + -
< + -
0.106 * -
0.254 + -
63.182 + -
< + -
< + -
1.184 + -
0.377 + -
0.120 + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.055 + -
0.036 + -
0.080 + -
0.424 + -
0.391 + -
< -i- -
0.033 + -
< + -
0.064 + -
11.664 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
83.987
NR = NOT REPORTED
1
1
C
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.045
0.057
0.019
0.516
0.057
0.061
0.023
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.019
NR
0.011
0.025
6.318
NR
NR
0.118
0.038
0.012
NR
NR
0.011
NR
0.018
0.042
0.053
0.078
0.016
NR
NR
1.166
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REMOVAL OF CARBON (PULVERIZED COAL) AND MOISTURE FROM ZINC OXIDE
CONTAINING APPROX. 10% LEAD AS PbS04. REF 43.
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE |REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP f |
20502 | 52 (ANTIMONY |J.E. HOWES,J.A.COOPER AND J.E. (ANTIMONY ROASTING STACK SAMPLES DOWNSTREAM
20502 | (OXIDE (HOUCK,"SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE [FROM A WATER SCRUBBER SYSTEM. SAMPLES
20502 | (PLANT (SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA," (COLLECTED WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER. SINGLE
20502 | | (DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO US EPA ENVIRON. (REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE FROM A GROUP OF 9. XRF
20502 | | (SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP. N.C. BY NEA, (ANALYSIS WITH ANALYTICAL UNCERTAIN1TES.
20502 | | |INC.(1983) |
20502 II! I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
ANTIMONY OXIDE PLANT-ANTIMONY
WET SCRUBBER
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.334
0.754
0.000
<
<
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.006
0.108
<
0.015
0.011
0.070
0.005
<
0.078
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
76.651
<
0.000
<
0.000
0.128
NA
NA
NA
NA
79.173
FINE
<2.5 UH ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.148
+ - 0.148
+ - 0.037
+ - 0.068
+ - 0.042
+ - 0.538
+ - 9.197
+ - NR
+ - 0.462
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
* - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
* - 0.005
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.027
+ - 3.630
+ - NR
+ 0.039
+ - NR
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.007
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
ROASTING.
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.493
0.786
0.000
<
<
0.000
0.000
0.080
0.008
0.125
<
0.010
0.005
0.012
0.004
<
0.090
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
87.726
<
0.000
<
0.028
0.103
NA
NA
NA
NA
90.478
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
* - 0.281
+ - 0.281
+ 0.066
+ 0.146
+ 0.084
+ - 0.935
+ 16.1
+ - NR
+ - 0.805
+ - 0.007
+ 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.016
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.003
+ - NR
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.017
+ 0.005
+ - 0.007
+ 0.029
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.039
+ - 0.355
+ - 7.138
+ NR
+ 0.212
+ NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.018
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE: 20502
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q (J||| ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ .
+
+ -
+ -
_+ -
'+ -
+ .
+
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ ,-
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
» -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
f -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 52.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE]REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER jGROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21101
21101
21101
21101
43 |LIMESTONE|J.£.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
| |APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
[GROUND LIMESTONE MANUFACTURED FOR USE AS
|FLUX. SAMPLES SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
LIMESTONE
3-03-010
NONE
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.110
6.496
0.126
1.023
0.455
0.163
29.515
0.081
<
<
0.050
1.043
<
0.016
0.104
0.020
<
0.027
0.024
<
<
0.042
<
<
<
<
<
0.270
NA
NA
NA
NA
41.565
OC = ORGANIC CARBON
< = LESS
DUST
05
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.211
+ - 0.650
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.104
f - 0.048
+ - 0.042
+ - 2.951
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.104
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.010
+ 0.013
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.027
+ - 0.045
+ 0.047
+ - 0.052
+ - 0.095
+ - 0.256
+ - NR
+ - 0.027
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
: EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.199
3.394
<
0.663
0.410
0.135
29.723
0.053
<
<
0.028
0.536
<
<
0.020
<
<
<
0.018
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.048
NA
NA
NA
NA
36.227
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.120
+ 0.339
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.066
+ - 0.041
+ 0.023
+ - 2.972
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.054
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.044
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 21101
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
% BY UT +-
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
1.067 + -
2.813 + -
< + -
0.743 + -
0.420 +
0.091 + -
28.643 * -
0.046 + -
< + -
< + -
0.025 + -
0.441 * -
< + -
< +
0.014 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.022 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< * -
< + -
0.051 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
34.376
NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.107
0.281
0.029
0.074
0.042
0.022
2.864
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.044
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.022
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :
GROUND LIMESTONE FLUX MATERIAL
- FUGITIVE DUST.
QUARRIED NEAR
MONTANA CITY, MONTANA. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE[SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21102
21102
21102
21102
21102
21102
43 (LEAD |J.E.TOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTER (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
(FUGITIVE DUST EMISSION FROM A LEAD ORE
(CONCENTRATE (AND OTHER LEAD CONTAINING
(MATERIALS) PROPORTIONING AND BLENDING
(OPERATION. SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH
IDICHOTOMOUS AND LOW-VOLUME SAMPLERS.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % }
K
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING ORE CONCENTRATE
3-03-010-05
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.300
3.800
0.500
8.000
1.000
0.880
2.200
0.100
<
0.092
0.200
3.700
0.040
1.200
3.492
1.340
0.024
0.200
0.056
0.044
0.140
0.788
0.013
0.101
0.299
0.172
0.042
10.377
NA
NA
NA
NA
40.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.400
+ - 0.100
+ 1.000
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.220
+ 0.030
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.400
+ NR
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.349
+ - 0.134
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ NR
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.039
+ - 0.090
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ - 0.132
* - 0.297
+ 0.014
+ - 1.034
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
0.500 + -
1.800 + -
0.200 + -
4.000 + -
0.160 + -
0.250 + -
2.100 +
0.100 + -
NR * -
0.107 + -
0.280 + -
5.300 + -
0.050 + -
1.600 + -
3.817 + -
0.737 + -
0.021 + -
0.040 + -
0.101 + -
0.085 + -
0.159 + -
0.536 + -
0.011 + -
0.160 * -
0.717 + -
0.083 + -
0.033 + -
13.786 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
36.733
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.200
0.050
1.000
0.040
0.030
0.210
0.300
NR
0.011
0.040
0.530
NR
0.200
0.382
0.074
NR
NR
0.010
NR
0.016
0.054
NR
0.016
0.072
0.021
NR
1.379
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21102
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY UT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.500 « -
1.500 + -
0.306 +
4.000 +
0.160 + -
0.373 + -
3.290 + -
0.101 + -
0.020 + -
0.179 + -
0.460 + -
9.150 +
0.091 +
2.575 + -
6.659 + -
1.097 + -
0.050 + -
0.040 +
0.176 + -
0.095 * -
0.239 + -
0.834 + -
NR + -
0.224 + -
0.979 + -
0.185 + -
0.047 + -
22.871 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
56.201
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.500
0.031
1.000
0.040
0.037
0.329
0.011
NR
0.018
0.046
0.915
NR
0.257
0.666
0.110
NR
0.020
0.018
NR
0.024
0.083
NR
0.022
0.098
0.036
NR
2.287
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : ORE CONCENTRATE BLENDING FUGITIVE EMISSIONS. REF. 43.
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE(SOURCE
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP | |
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
21103
43 (LEAD
(SMELTER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IJ.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
(FUGITIVE DUST FROM THE STORAGE AND HANDLING
(OF LEAD ORE CONCENTRATES AND OTHER LEAD
(CONTAINING MATERIALS. THE LEAD SMELTER IS A
("CUSTOM SMELTER", HENCE THE CONCENTRATES AND
(OTHER MATERIALS ORIGINATE FROM SOURCES
(WORLDWIDE. THIS PROFILE IS AVERAGE OF
(FOURTEEN ORE AND OTHER LEAD CONTAINING
(MATERIALS. BULK SAMPLES WERE SIEVED AND
(RESUSPENDED.
I
I
-------
13-Jun-aS
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-ORE CONCENTRATE COMPOSITE
3-03-010-05
NONE
****** ***
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.374
9.709
0.808
17.067
0.016
0.895
2.025
<
0.219
0.027
0.039
0.296
6.708
<
0.092
6.588
3.561
<
<
3.935
0.030
0.353
<
0.056
<
0.600
0.213
0.292
4.593
<
0.266
<
0.026
24.865
NA
NA
NA
NA
87.653
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 2.914
+ - 6.315
+ - 0.159
+ - 4.343
+ - 0.049
+ - 0.489
+ - 1.218
+ - NR
+ - 0.104
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.482
+ - 5.077
+ - NR
+ - 0.047
+ - 5.355
+ 2.921
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.847
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.237
+ - NR
+ - 0.105
+ - NR
+ - 0.571
+ - 0.183
+ - 0.252
+ - 4.246
+ - NR
+ - 0,449
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 15.0
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.280
5.627
0.539
12.353
0.000
0.486
1.888
<
0.172
0.014
0.031
0.206
6.448
<
0.102
7.088
4.300
<
<
3.679
0.033
0.335
<
0.063
<
0.596
0.393
0.385
4.178
<
0.077
<
0.026
25.959
NA
NA
NA
NA
77.258
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.064
+ - 4.352
+ - 0.109
+ - 2.980
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.533
+ 1.099
* - NR
+ 0.093
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.305
+ 5.536
+ - NR
+ - 0.066
+ - 5.705
+ - 3.241
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.745
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.219
+ - NR
+ - 0.154
+ NR
+ - 0.370
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.214
+ - 4.316
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ - 0.023
+ - 16.8
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.238
5.581
0.495
10.715
0.029
0.441
1.479
<
0.167
0.019
0.035
0.211
7.044
<
0.125
7.312
4.647
<
<
3.074
0.022
0.315
<
0.059
<
0.610
0.382
0.313
4.723
<
0.113
<
0.034
28.996
NA
NA
NA
NA
79.179
21103
3321
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.073
+ - 4.510
+ - 0.121
+ - 4.069
+ - 0.183
+ - 0.504
+ - 1.239
+ - NR
+ - 0.109
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.324
+ - 6.466
+ - NR
+ - 0.079
+ - 6.216
+ - 3.911
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 3.755
f - 0.013
+ - 0.299
+ - NR
+ - 0.158
+ - NR
+ - 0.648
+ - 0.190
+ - 0.245
+ - 5.568
+ - NR
+ - 0.071
+ - NR
+ - 0.039
+ - 16.7
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 0.000 INDICATES < 0.001%. COMPOSITION OF VARIOUS ORE CONCENTRATES
AND LEAD CONTAINING RESIDUES. FUGITIVE DUST. REF. 43.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
PROFIUE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21203
21203
21203
21203
21203
43 | COKE DUST |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL., "EAST HELENA SOURCE
| | APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
|FUGITIVE DUST FROM COKE STORAGE AND
|HANDLING. BULK SAMPLE GROUND, SIEVED AND
IRESUSPEMDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COKE DUST
3-03-010-05
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.039
8.131
0.137
0.381
0.164
0.217
2.738
<
0.236
0.022
0.016
0.000
1.464
<
0.000
0.516
0.399
<
<
0.041
0.000
0.014
<
0.012
<
0.000
0.050
0.000
0.225
<
0.560
<
0.017
0.249
NA
NA
NA
NA
19.628
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.519
* - 1.005
+ - 0.041
+ 0.132
+ - 0.055
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.342
+ NR
+ - 0.034
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.189
+ NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.068
+ - 0.054
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.026
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - NR
+ 0.014
+ - NR
+ - 0.062
+ 0.089
+ - 0.119
* - 0.203
+ - NR
+ 0.610
* NR
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.049
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
2.568 + -
6.250 + -
0.118 +
0.568 + -
0.032 +
0.167 + -
2.285 +
< + -
0.157 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.010 + -
0.907 +
< + -
0.000 + -
0.731 + -
0.313 + -
< -i- -
< + -
0.021 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
< +
0.000 +
< +
0.000 + -
0.013 + -
0.000 + -
0.069 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.131 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
14.340
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.257
0.625
0.012
0.057
0.000
0.017
0.228
NR
0.016
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.091
NR
0.000
0.073
0.031
NR
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
NR
0.000
NR
0.000
0.000
0.012
0.023
NR
0.061
NR
0.000
0.013
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.007
7.663
0.144
0.596
0.047
0.187
2.229
<
0.181
0.000
0.000
0.013
1.037
<
0.000
1.083
0.459
<
<
0.023
0.000
0.000
<
0.000
<
0.000
0.012
0.000
0.000
<
0.066
<
0.000
0.201
NA
NA
NA
NA
16.948
21203
3321
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.301
+ - 0.766
* - 0.014
+ - 0.060
f - 0.000
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.223
+ NR
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.104
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.108
+ - 0.046
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ NR
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.000
* - 0.018
+ - NR
+ - 0.048
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 0.000 INDICATES < 0.001. REF.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21204
21204
21204
21204
21204
43 (COAL OUST|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
| (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| [THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
(FUGITIVE OUST FROM COAL STORAGE AND
(HANDLING. SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
KG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
PD
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
IN
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COAL DUST
3-03-010-05
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.865
22.466
0.194
0.566
0.171
0.968
3.142
<
0.283
<
0.015
0.013
1.422
<
<
0.022
0.033
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.015
<
<
<
0.027
<
<
0.077
0.031
<
0.072
NA
NA
NA
NA
40.382
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.086
+ - 2.247
+ - 0.019
+ 0.057
+ 0.020
+ - 0.097
+ - 0.314
+ - NR
+ - 0.028
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.142
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.011
+ 0.014
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.028
+ - 0.054
+ - NR
+ - 0.138
+ - 0.024
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
4.627 * -
11.346 + -
0.085 *
0.417 + -
0.067 + -
0.489 *
3.422 + -
< +
0.161 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
0.945 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -I- -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.015 +
< +
< +
0.017 * -
< + -
0.018 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.018 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
21 .627
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.463
1.135
NR
0.042
NR
0.049
0.342
NR
0.016
NR
NR
NR
0.094
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.013
0.021
NR
0.061
0.011
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21204
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
5.273 + -
12.956 + -
0.097 + -
0.533 + -
0.086 + -
0.519 + -
4.465 + -
< + -
0.172 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
1.109 + -
< + -
< + -
0.049 + -
0.041 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
< + -
0.016 + -
< + -
< + -
0.012 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.108 + -
< + -
< + -
0.044 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
25.480
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.527
1.296
NR
0.053
NR
0.052
0.446
NR
0.017
NR
NR
NR
0.111
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.012
0.022
NR
0.056
0.011
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : FUGITIVE DUST. REF. 43.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21205 |
21205 I
21205 |
21205 |
43 | LEAD |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.f"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTING (APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I I
(SPEISS FUGITIVE DUSTS.
I
I
I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
s
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
°ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-SPEISS FUGITIVE DUST
3-03-010-09
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.735
2.613
0.233
3.716
0.000
0.074
1.289
<
0.077
0.011
0.022
0.036
2.366
<
0.755
37.919
1.109
<
<
6.460
0.040
0.596
<
0.011
<
0.526
0.339
0.649
3.641
<
0.038
<
0.024
17.880
NA
NA
NA
NA
81.159
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.073
+ - 0.261
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.734
t- - 0.048
+ 0.000
+ - 0.129
+ NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.237
+ - NR
f - 0.075
+ 3.792
+ 0.111
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.646
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - NR
+ 0.053
+ - 0.034
+ - 0.065
+ - 0.364
+ - NR
+ 0.025
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 1.788
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT t" UNC
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
0.735 + -
2.613 + -
0.233 +
3.716 + -
0.000 + -
0.074 +
1.289 + -
< + -
0.077 + -
0.011 + -
0.022 + -
0.036 + -
2.366 + -
< +
0.755 + -
37.919 +
1.109 + -
< + -
< + -
6.460 + -
0.040 + -
0.596 + -
< + -
0.011 + -
< *
0.526 + -
0.339 + -
0.649 + -
3.641 + -
< + -
0.038 + -
< + -
0.024 + -
17.880 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
81.159
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.073
0.261
0.023
0.734
0.048
0.000
0.129
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.237
NR
0.075
3.792
0.111
NR
NR
0.646
0.000
0.060
NR
0.000
NR
0.053
0.034
0.065
0.364
NR
0.025
NR
0.000
1.788
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.735
2.613
0.233
3.716
0.000
0.074
1.289
<
0.077
0.011
0.022
0.036
2.366
<
0.755
37.919
1.109
<
<
6.460
0.040
0.596
<
0.011
<
0.526
0.339
0.649
3.641
<
0.038
<
0.024
17.880
NA
NA
NA
NA
81.159
21205
3321
D
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.073
+ - 0.261
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.734
+ - 0.048
f - 0.000
+ - 0.129
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.237
+ - NR
+ - 0.075
+ - 3.792
+ - 0.111
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.646
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ 0.000
+ NR
+ - 0.053
+ - 0.034
+ - 0.065
+ - 0.364
+ - NR
+ - 0.025
+ NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 1.788
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC - ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 43.
: NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFIIE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21206 |
21206 |
21206 |
21206 |
43 (LEAD |J.£.HOUCH,ET.AL.,»EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTING (APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
| |
(SODA
I
I
I
FLUX FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
HI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-SODA FLUX FUGITIVE OUST
3-03-010-05
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY UT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.511
1.105
0.079
1.792
0.266
0.240
0.414
<
0.019
0.013
0.000
0.021
0.336
<
0.000
0.137
0.717
<
<
0.169
0.000
0.093
<
0.000
<
0.000
0.487
0.017
0.000
<
0.000
<
0.000
2.172
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.588
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.103
+ - 0.139
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.261
+ 0.065
+ 0.042
+ - 0.053
+ - NR
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
* 0.000
+ - 0.049
+ - NR
+ 0.000
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.082
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.049
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.015
+ NR
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
+ - 0.055
+ - 0.109
+ - 0.105
+ - 0.191
+ NR
+ 0.495
+ - NR
+ - 0.014
+ 0.243
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.055 * -
0.201 + -
0.013 + -
0.298 + -
0.022 + -
0.038 +
0.161 + -
< *
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 +
0.000 + -
0.180 * -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.080 + -
0.233 + -
< + -
< + -
0.090 + -
0.000 + -
0.011 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.070 + -
0.011 + -
0.046 + -
< + -
0.038 +
< -t- -
0.000 + -
0.841 + -
NA + -
NA 1- -
NA + -
NA + -
2.388
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.014
0.020
0.000
0.047
0.000
0.000
0.016
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.018
NR
0.000
0.000
0.023
NR
NR
0.011
0.000
0.000
NR
0.000
NR
0.000
0.014
0.014
0.028
NR
0.072
NR
0.000
0.084
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21206
RANKING: 3321
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3(j UM
X BY WT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
0.062 + -
0.174 +
0.000 + -
0.215 + -
0.000 + -
0.014 + -
0.139 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
0.206 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.082 + -
0.229 + -
< + -
< + -
0.063 + -
0.000 + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.055 + -
0.014 + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
< + -
0.000 + -
0.813 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.066
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.000
0.017
0.000
0.036
0.000
0.000
0.014
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.021
NR
0.000
0.000
0.023
NR
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
NR
0.000
NR
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
NR
0.023
NR
0.000
0.081
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 0.000 INDICATES < 0.001. REF. 43.
NA - NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE[SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21301
21301
21301
21301
44 [COPPER |0. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (COPPER ORE. FUGITIVE DUST FROM CRUSHING AND
(ORE [CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE, "STATE OF MONTANA [HANDLING. BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND
| IOEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) (RESUSPENDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
1
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PO
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COPPER ORE
3-03-024-
NONE
**i>inwm*#
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
18.798
42.046
0.541
1.600
0.122
3.942
0.881
0.311
0.046
0.030
0.087
4.359
0.012
1.009
0.212
<
0.018
0.013
<
<
0.041
<
<
<
<
0.023
<
0.025
<
<
0.656
<
<
0.214
NA
NA
NA
NA
CRUSHING
01
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 1.880
+ 4.205
+ - 0.054
+ - 0.172
+ - 0.035
+ 0.394
+ - 0.088
+ - 0.031
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.436
+ NR
+ - 0.101
+ - 0.022
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.027
+ - 0.039
« - 0.056
+ - 0.059
+ - 0.072
+ - 0.127
+ - 0.353
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.029
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
X BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.899
31.945
0.258
1.149
0.102
3.662
0.717
0.390
0.032
0.021
0.102
4.062
<
1.063
0.233
<
0.033
<
<
0.021
0.034
<
<
0.097
<
<
<
<
<
0.012
0.036
<
<
0.105
NA
NA
NA
NA
PROFILE: 21301
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
COARSE TSP
+ UNC X BY UT +- UNC
« NR +
f - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
* 1.390 + -
+ - 3.194 + -
+ 0.026 +
* - 0.115 + -
+ - 0.010 + -
+ - 0.366 + -
+ - 0.072 +
+ 0.039 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.010 + -
+ 0.406 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.106 + -
+ - 0.023 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR . + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.019 + -
+ - 0.048 + -
+ - 0.075
+ - NR +
+ - 0.010 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
SUM(
74.986
57.973
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : FUGITIVE DUST. REF. 44.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE | RE FERENCE | SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21302 |
21302 |
21302 |
21302 |
44 (COPPER
(ORE
I
I
|D. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY:
(CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE ."STATE OF MONTANA
JDEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982)
I
(COPPER ORE MILLING AND MOLYBDENIUM PLANT
(WASTE PILE. BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND
(RESUSPENDED.
I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
S03
COPPER ORE MILL WASTEPILE
3-03-024-01
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
21.269
40.602
0.346
1.349
0.111
4.353
0.561
0.292
0.025
0.028
0.108
3.075
<
1.234
0.400
<
0.049
<
<
<
0.026
<
<
<
<
<
0.046
<
<
0.053
0.106
<
<
0.287
NA
NA
NA
NA
74.320
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - 2.127
+ 4.060
+ - 0.035
* - 0.135
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.435
+ - 0.056
* - 0.029
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.307
+ - NR
+ - 0.123
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - 0.013
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.025
f - 0.038
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.048
+ 0.088
+ - 0.222
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.029
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
14.655 * -
30.240 + -
0.203 + -
1.272 + -
0.102 + -
3.900 + -
0.757 + -
0.422 + -
0.030 + -
0.018 * -
0.112 + -
3.270 + -
< +
1.238 + -
0.496 + -
< + -
0.062 + -
< + -
< + -
0.022 +
0.032 + -
< + -
< + -
0.038 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.014 + -
< + -
< + -
0.066 + -
< + -
< + -
0.202 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
57.151
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
1.465
3.024
0.020
0.127
0.010
0.390
0.076
0.042
NR
NR
0.011
0.327
NR
0.124
0.050
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.014
0.038
0.061
NR
0.020
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21302
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE |REFERENCE|SOURCE
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER | NUMBER
21303 | 44
21303 |
21303 |
21303 I
| GROUP
[COPPER
| ORE
I
I
I
|D. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY:
[CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE, "STATE OF MONTANA
[DEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982)
I
I I
.. ...... ., i
1
(COPPER ORE CONCENTRATE FUGITIVE DUST. |
[BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED. |
1 1
1 1
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COPPER ORE CONCENTRATE
3-03-02-024-04
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.923
15.955
0.596
12.929
0.020
1.745
0.517
0.239
0.039
0.050
0.087
10.355
0.103
21.726
4.717
NA
1.016
0.012
0.081
NA
0.017
NA
NA
NA
<
0.090
0.043
0.019
0.036
0.094
<
NA
0.020
1.082
NA
NA
NA
NA
79.511
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.792
+ - 1.595
+ - 0.060
+ 1.293
+ - 0.042
+ - 0,174
+ - 0.052
+ - 0.024
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 1.035
+ - 0.010
+ - 2.173
+ - 0.472
+ - NR
+ - 0.102
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.026
+ - 0.068
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.108
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.648 + -
5.969 « -
0.326 * -
10.182 + -
< + -
0.887 *
0.456 + -
0.219 +
0.034 +
0.042 + -
0.069 + -
12.101 + -
0.109 + -
22.110 + -
6.446 +
0.051 + -
0.991 +
< +
0.081 * -
< + -
0.017 + -
< + -
0.035 + -
0.520 + -
0.020 + -
0.063 + -
0.052 « -
0.025 + -
0.051 + -
0.073 + -
< + -
< * -
0.022 + -
1.023 +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
64.622
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.265
0.597
0.033
1.018
0.032
0.089
0.046
0.022
NR
NR
NR
1.210
0.011
2.211
0.645
NR
0.099
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.052
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.015
0.023
NR
0.102
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21303
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3o UM
X BY UT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA * -
0.000
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC - ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : FUGITIVE DUST. REF. 44.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF I LE | REFERENCE | SOURCE
NUMBER | NUMBER | GROUP
21304 |
21304 |
21304 |
21304 |
21304 I
44 (COPPER
[MINING
I
I
I
| REFERENCE (REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I I
|D. MAUGHH,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (COPPER MINING AND/OR CONCENTRATING WASTE
(CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE, "STATE OF MONTANA (PILE. BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
IDEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) |
I I -I
I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
COPPER MINING WASTE
3-03-024-04
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11.447
25.023
0.556
4.944
0.097
2.304
1.087
0.403
0.044
0.052
0.089
14.384
0.014
0.353
0.650
NA
0.051
<
0.018
NA
<
NA
NA
NA
<
0.016
0.031
<
<
0.169
<
NA
<
1.197
NA
NA
NA
NA
62.929
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.145
+ - 2.502
+ - 0.056
+ - 0.494
+ - 0.035
+ - 0.230
+ 0.109
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.438
+ - NR
+ - 0.035
* 0.065
+ - NA
+ 0.025
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.021
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.044
+ - 0.047
+ - 0.050
+ 0.095
+ - 0.269
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.120
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
9.769 +
24.576 + -
0.310 + -
2.691 +
0.096 + -
2.093 +
1.937 + -
0.519 + -
0.035 +
0.036 + -
0.108 + -
9.106 + -
< + -
0.272 + -
0.696 + -
< + -
0.043 + -
< + -
< + -
0.014 +
0.019 + -
< + -
0.016 + -
0.014 + -
< 4- -
< + -
< * -
< + -
< + -
0.046 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.633 + -
NA * -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
53.029
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.977
2.458
0.031
0.269
0.013
0.209
0.194
0.052
NR
NR
0.011
0.911
NR
NR
0.027
0.070
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.017
0.046
0.069
NR
0.063
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21304
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT 1-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA *
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA * -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA -f -
0.000
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COPPER MINING AND/OR CONCENTRATING WASTE MATERIAL. REF. 44.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF IIE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
21401
10 [GRAIN |H.j. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
[PROCESS [BRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
[STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
[SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
[5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
[ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
[OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
[SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
[HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
[IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
|AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
[(ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
[OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
[BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
IOCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
[SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
[METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
[OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
[ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
[LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
[REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
[ORIGINAL REFERENCE: M. SITIG, "PARTICULATES
[AND FINE DUST REMOVAL," HOYES DATA CORP.
[(1977) P. 175 (NOT REVIEWED). USE WITH
[CAUTION. DATA FROM TABACK APPENDIX A, PROFILE
[NO. 29.
I
[NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
[0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
[DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
|ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
[COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
TC
EC
S04
N03
FEED AND GRAIN HANDLING DUST.
3-02-005-01
UNKNOWN
FINE
********* <2.5 DM
X BY WT +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NR +
NR + -
NR +
15.000 + -
< +
< + -
< +
0.550 + -
0.550 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< *
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< * -
< +
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< +
< + -
30.000 + -
NA + -
0.550 + -
NA +
46.750
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
*********
X BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
15.000
<
<
<
0.550
0.550
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
30.000
NA
0.550
NA
46.750
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
15.000
<
<
<
0.550
0.550
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
30.000
NA
0.550
NA
46.750
21401
UNKNOWN
D
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ : NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : SOURCE TEST, ANALYTICAL METHODS AND REPRESENTATIVENESS
REF: 10 OF THE DATA UNKNOWN BUT LIKELY OF POOR QUALITY.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE[SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
[FUGITIVE DUST FROM LEAD SMELTING SLAG PILE. |
(BULK SAMPLE IS COMPOSITE OF NUMEROUS SAMPLES |
(COLLECTED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON THE PILE. |
(BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED. |
I I
21501
21501
21501
21501
21501
43 (LEAD |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
|SMELTING-(APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(SLAG (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
33
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
<
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-SLAG DUST
3-03-999-99
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY UT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.744
13.202
0.352
4.260
0.229
0.777
9.313
0.372
0.092
0.096
1.168
16.292
0.054
1.766
11.305
0.634
<
0.065
0.182
<
0.033
0.050
0.053
<
0.244
0.084
0.023
6.114
NA
NA
NA
NA
75.504
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ 0.374
+ - 1.820
+ - 0.035
+ - 0.426
+ - 0.052
+ - 0.078
+ 0.931
+ - 0.037
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.117
+ 1.629
+ - NR
+ - 0.177
+ - 1.130
+ - 0.068
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.028
+ - 0.043
+ - 0.047
+ - 0.055
+ - 0.108
+ 0.269
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.611
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY UT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
2.150 + -
11.323 + -
0.202 +
2.237 +
0.119 + -
0.570 + -
7.499 + -
0.290 + -
0.051 + -
0.086 +
0.988 + -
15.294 + -
0.046 + -
1.044 +
7.296 + -
0.357 + -
< +
0.031 + -
0.150 + -
< + -
< + -
0.037 + -
< + -
0.094 + -
0.069 + -
0.194 + -
0.014 +
3.159 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
53.300
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.215
1.132
0.020
0.224
0.025
0.057
0.750
0.029
NR
NR
0.099
1.529
NR
0.104
0.730
0.036
NR
NR
0.015
NR
0.012
0.020
0.018
0.023
0.042
0.109
NR
0.316
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 21501
RANKING: 3321
RATING : C
TSP
********* <30 UM
X BY WT +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.349 + -
12.509 + -
0.183 +
1.967 + -
0.112 + -
0.648 + -
9.245 + -
0.257 + -
0.044 + -
0.112 + -
1.278 + -
21.323 + -
0.048 + -
1.189 + -
9.203 + -
0.325 + -
< + -
0.034 + -
0.195 + -
0.018 +
0.018 . + -
0.055 + -
< + -
0.062 + -
0.202 + -
0.353 + -
0.014 + -
3.500 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
65.243
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.235
1.251
0.018
0.197
0.017
0.065
0.924
0.026
NR
0.011
0.128
2.132
NR
0.119
0.920
0.032
NR
NR
0.019
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.021
0.042
NR
0.350
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
NOTES: OC - ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : LEAD SLAG OTHER PE-ZINING. FUGITIVE DUST. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER {NUMBER {GROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
22101
22101
22101
221P1
22101
45 (PARTICLE IR.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER,"MEDFORD AEROSOL
IBOARD (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
(DRIER (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM ONE
(SOURCE. GLUES USED IN PRODUCTION <1% NACL.
(MULTICLONE CONTROLS. WHITE CITY, OREGON..
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
TC
OC
EC
S04
N03
PARTICLE BOARD DRYER
3-07-007-03
MULT I CLONES
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
3.700
NA
<
0.250
NA
1.400
4.500
4.000
0.500
NA
<
<
<
0.090
0.100
NA
<
<
0.060
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
50.000
8.000
3.650
1.250
76.100
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 4.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.800
* - 0.800
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.010
+ 0.010
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
+ NR
+ . ******
+ - 5.000
4- - 0.600
+ - 0.350
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY UT +- UNC
NA + -
NA 4- -
NA 4- -
0.300 + -
0.040 +> -
< + -
< 4- -
NA + -
0.030 + -
< + -
< 4-
0.100 + -
NA + -
< + -
< 4- -
< + -
NA 4- -
NA + -
NA + -
< + -
< 4-
NA + -
NA 4- -
< 4- -
< + .
< +
< 4- -
NA 4- -
< 4- -
NA +
NA 4- -
< 4- -
NA 4- -
< 4- -
NA 4. -
< + -
< 4- -
< 4-
< 4- -
58.000 4.-
NA +
NA 4. -
0.100 4- -
0.500 4- -
59.040
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.020
NR
0.100
NR
0.003
NR
NR
0.030
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
******
NR
NR
0.100
0.200
PROFILE: 22101
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY A3STRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
22102 |
22102 |
22102 |
22102 |
22102 |
22102 |
45 [PARTICLE (R.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MEDFORD AEROSOL
(BOARD (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
(DRIER (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH A
|TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMAPACTOR FROM ONE SOURCE.
(HIGH NA,CL CONTENT DUE TO USE OF HIGH SALT-
|CONTENT RESIN GLUES USED IN PARTICLEBOARD
(PRODUCTION. WET SCRUBBER. MEDFORD, OREGON.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
t>
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PARTICLE BOARD DRYER
3-07-007-03
MULT I CLONES
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
18.200
<
<
0.250
<
1.000
23.400
1.050
0.200
<
<
<
<
0.020
0.020
<
<
<
0.020
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
10.000
1.200
3.650
1.250
60.260
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.100
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ NR
+ - 0.400
+ - 1.900
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
« - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 5.000
+ - 0.300
+ 0.070
+ 0.350
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
17.000 + -
0.400 * -
NA + -
1.100 + -
NA + -
1.900 + -
25.000 + -
1.500 + -
1.100 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
< + -
< 4- -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< ( -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
10.000 +
1.200 + -
2.200 + -
0.500 + -
61 .,900
NR
NR
NR
4.000
0.600
NR
0.100
NR
0.500
6.000
0.300
0.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.000
0.300
0.500
0.200
PROFILE: 22102
RANKING: 2324
RATING : 8
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
4- -
+ .
+
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
» -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
4- -
4-
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
4- -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
22201
10 (SANDER (H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
IDUST IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
|5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI.P AND S WERE
IOCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
IOCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
{LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(AVERAGE OF 5 SOURCE TESTS FROM CYCLONE
(OUTLET OF WOOD SANDING OPERATION AND
(RESAUING. PURE CARBON SOURCE. WOOD, OR
(CELLULOSE 10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
s
s
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< X )
iOURCE:
ICC:
IONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD PRODUCTS-SANDERDUST
3-07-007-02
CYCLONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY UT + UNC
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NR * - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
0.050 -f NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.050 + - NR
< + NR
< * NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
0.050 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
35.000 + NR
6.000 + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
41.150
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY UT + UNC
NA + - NR
NA + NR
NA « NR
NR + - NR
NR + NR
NR + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
0.050 + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.050 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
0.050 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
35.000 + - NR
6.000 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
41.150
PROFILE: 22201
RANKING: 2121
RATING : C
TSP
********* <30 UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + NR
NA + NR
NA + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
NR * - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.050 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
0.050 + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.050 + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
35.000 + - NR
6.000 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
41.150
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA « NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : SANDERDUST IS A NEARLY PURE CARBON SOURCE WITH NO DISTINGUISHING TRACE
REF: 10 ELEMENT MARKERS. EC ESTIMATED FROM TOTAL AND VOLATILE CARBON.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE | REFERENCE | SOURCE | REFERENCE
NUMBER | NUMBER | GROUP |
22202 |
22202 |
22202 |
22202 |
22202 I
45 (SAWDUST (R.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MED FORD AEROSOL
| (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
I I
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
(GRAB SAMPLE OF SAWDUST FROM CYCLONE CATCH.
(AVERAGE OF SIX SAMPLES.
I
I
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SAWDUST
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
0.240
<
0.180
0.300
<
<
0.030
0.030
0.240
<
<
<
<
0.010
0.210
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
50.000
4.600
NA
NA
55.840
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ 0.130
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.140
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.500
+ - 1.000
+ NR
+ NR
"
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
0.240 + -
< + -
0.090 + -
0.110 + -
< + -
< + -
0.140 + -
0.060 + -
0.500 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.010 + -
0.130 + -
< +
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< » -
< +
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
< +
< -i- -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
48.000 + -
4.700 + -
NA +
NA + -
53.980
NR
NR
NR
0.100
NR
0.090
0.160
NR
NR
0.140
0.030
0.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.110
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.000
1.500
NR
NR
PROFILE: 22202
RANKING: 1324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UN ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
( -
+
+ -
+ -
+
+
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : GRAB SAMPLES FROM CYCLONE BAGHOUSE. REF.
NR = NOT REPORTED
45.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
22301 |
22301 |
22301 |
22301 |
22301 |
45 (VENEER
(DRIER
I
I
I
IR.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MED FORD AEROSOL
(CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
(OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
1
(AVERAGE OF SIX SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH
(TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR FROM THREE
(SOURCES. NO CONTROLS.
1
1
A
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
VENEER DRYER
3-07-007-01
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
81.650 + 10.37
0.767 + - 0.522
NA + NR
NA + - NR
82.417
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
81.650 + - 10.37
0.767 + - 0.522
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
82.417
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
22301
2324
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
23103 | 49 |KRAFT (J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH,
23103 | (RECOVERY |SEATTLE-TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION
23103 | (FURNACE (STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORTF TO THE PUGET
23103 | | (SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA.INC. (SCRUBBER.
23103 | | (1983. |
23103 III I
(AVERAGE OF FOUR REPLICATE SAMPLES COLLECTED
(FROM ONE STACK USING A DILUTION SAMPLER.
(STACK FITTED WITH AN ESP FOLLOWED BY A WET
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
KRAFT RECOVERY FURNANCE
3-07-001-10
ESP & WET SCRUBBER
FINE
********* <2.5 UH
X BY WT + -
NA + -
NA * -
1.859 +
25.350 + -
0.473 + -
0.219 *
0.101 + -
14.440 + -
1.707 + -
2.010 + -
0.063 + -
0.007 + -
0.002 +
0.008 + -
0.010 + -
0.143 +
0.025 + -
0.001 + -
0.014 + -
0.003 +
0.003 * -
0.056 + -
0.012 + -
0.006 + -
0.009 +
0.008 + -
0.015 + -
0.018 + -
0.013 + -
0.013 + -
0.017 + -
0.010 + -
0.097 +
0.114 + -
0.001 + -
0.016 + -
1.951 +
0.042 +
51.038 + -
0.101 +
99.975
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC =
< = LESS
UNC
NR
NR
3.100
13.00
0.430
0.170
0.170
1.800
0.380
0.238
0.094
0.006
0.002
0.012
0.012
0.210
0.052
0.001
0.018
0.003
0.003
0.012
0.004
0.008
0.011
0.010
0.019
0.019
0.015
0.030
0.020
0.060
0.115
0.135
0.003
0.020
0.250
0.050
9.000
0.170
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA =
PROFILE: 23103
RANKING: 3324
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3(j UM ******
+- UNC X BY WT + UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
« NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOT ANALYZED :
NA + -
NA +
1.570 + -
26.740 +
0.490 + -
0.311 + -
0.135 + -
14.430 + -
1.700 + -
1.960 + -
0.081 +
0.008 +
0.002 + -
0.016 + -
0.014 + -
0.147 +
0.026 + -
0.004 + -
0.017 + -
0.004 + -
0.005 + -
0.052 + -
0.020 + -
0.005 +
0.021 + -
0.010 « -
0.029 + -
0.020 + -
0.018 + -
0.039 + -
0.024 + -
0.026 + -
0.115 + -
0.218 + -
0.002 + -
0.026 + -
2.567 + -
0.142 + -
48.812 + -
0.126 + -
99.932
NR = NOT REPORTED
NR
NR
2.452
10.74
0.367
0.187
0.143
1.676
0.334
0.232
0.076
0.005
0.002
0.010
0.010
0.168
0.042
0.004
0.014
0.003
0.004
0.010
0.007
0.007
0.023
0.010
0.015
0.022
0.013
0.061
0.018
0.059
0.102
0.217
0.003
0.017
0.320
0.132
7.379
0.144
THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : PROFILES
INCLUDE 8%
CORRECTION TO
NORMALIZE DATA
TO 100% REF. 49.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER ]GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
23202 | 49 |LIME KILN|J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH, (AVERAGE OF THREE REPLICATE SAMPLES FROM A |
23202 | | |SEATTLE-TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION (SINGLE LINE KILN STACK. STACK WAS EQUIPPED |
23202 | | (STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORTF TO THE PUGET (WITH A WET SCRUBBER. SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED |
23202 | | (SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA.INC. (WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER EQUIPPED WITH A |
23202 | | (1983. (TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR. |
23202 ((I I I
23202 ((I I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
42
46
47
48
50
51
56
57
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X }
BE
8
F
NA
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PO
AG
CD
SN
SB
BA
LA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
LIME KILN
3-07-001-06
WET SCRUBBER
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
0.038
36.210
0.064
0.038
0.105
16.520
2.618
1.299
0.342
0.004
0.068
0.011
0.015
0.041
0.032
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.024
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.012
0.004
0.006
0.027
0.015
0.047
0.019
0.029
0.099
0.118
0.002
0.018
9.280
0.464
48.830
0.092
100.000
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.007
+ 4.000
+ - 0.074
+ 0.042
+ 0.227
+ - 1.780
+ - 0.282
+ - 0.140
+ - 0.037
+ - 0.003
+ 0.007
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.003
+ 0.009
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.007
+ 0.002
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.009
+ 0.006
* - 0.020
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.032
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.107
+ - 0.127
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.011
+ 1.000
+ - 0.500
+ - 8.000
+ 0.100
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA -t-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA ' +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
23202
3324
B
TSP
********* <3Q LM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA
NA
1.296
34.680
0.303
0.200
0.175
16.040
2.630
1.280
0.390
0.004
0.063
0.015
0.022
0.066
0.047
0.006
0.013
0.005
0.005
0.023
0.011
0.009
0.005
0.020
0.033
0.015
0.068
0.026
0.069
0.032
0.049
0.169
0.201
0.004
0.023
10.120
0.576
47.197
0.150
100.000
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.240
+ - 3.681
+ - 0.094
+ - 0.056
+ - 0.195
+ 1.703
+ - 0.326
+ - 0.136
+ - 0.042
+ 0.003
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.012
+ 0.025
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.035
+ - 0.127
+ - 0.151
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.013
+ - 1.724
+ - 0.481
+ - 6.881
+ 0.113
NR = NOT REPORTED
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : DATA NORMALIZED TO 100% WITH A 6% CORRECTION FACTOR.REF. 49.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
24101
46 ISULFITE [J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
(RECOVERY (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
(FURNACE (FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
(IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTERC1979)
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IHPACTOR
|(2.0 UN D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
[CARBON OXIDATIONCCORRECTEO FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
I
(AVERAGE OF 2 SAMPLES FROM TWO PLANTS.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SULFITE RECOVERY BOILER
3-07-002-34
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
2.500
0.730
<
0.400
<
12.000
0.580
30.000
2.000
<
0.010
<
<
0.054
0.066
<
<
0.016
0.017
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
NA
NA
56.000
0.300
92.673
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.800
+ - 0.520
+ NR
+ - 0.150
+ NR
+ - 2.000
+ 0.100
+ 10.00
+ - 0.200
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.036
+ NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.017
* - 0.002
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.030
+ NR
+ NR
+ 11.20
+ 0.060
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
2.500 + -
0.730 + -
< + -
0.400 + -
< +
12.000 +
0.580 +
30.000 +
2.000 +
< + -
0.010 + -
< +
< + -
0.054 + -
0.066 +
< + -
< + -
0.016 + -
0.017 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< t -
< + -
< + -
NA + -
NA + -
56.000 +
0.300 + -
92.673
NR
NR
NR
0.800
0.520
NR
0.150
NR
2.000
0.100
10.00
0.200
NR
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.070
0.036
NR
0.001
0.017
0.002
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.030
NR
NR
11.20
0.060
PROFILE: 24101
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.000
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARSON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR - NOT REPORTED
-------
13-JUV85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
25201
46
CARBIDE |J.G. WATSON, "CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
FURNACE (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
| FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PART I OIL ATE MATTER
| IN PORTLAND .OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
| (2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OX I DAT I ON (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
1
1
AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES FROM THE SAME SOURCE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
HI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
CALCIUM CARBIDE FURNACE
3-05-009-99
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.920
2.400
0.580
2.500
<
1.600
1.050
1.250
30.000
<
<
<
<
0.042
0.540
<
0.022
0.020
0.015
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.008
7.300
1.200
3.200
0.570
53.217
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.100
+ - 0.100
+ 0.350
+ - 0.110
+ - 0.070
+ NR
+ - 0.420
+ - 0.070
+ 0.350
+ 4.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
* - 0.003
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.007
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 1.300
+ - 0.280
+ 0.420
+ - 0.240
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.430
1.250
0.860
2.900
<
0.540
0.960
0.480
25.800
<
<
0.009
<
0.036
0.330
<
0.021
0.040
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
4.500
3.600
0.930
NA
42.686
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.200
+ 0.050
+ - 0.350
+ - 0.130
+ - 1.300
+ NR
+ - 0.570
+ 0.630
+ - 0.300
+ - 8.700
+ NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.130
+ - NR
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.780
+ - 1.800
+ - 1.100
+ - 0.500
PROFILE: 25201
RANKING: 2324
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q uj4 ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
4- -
+ .
+
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46. THIS PROFILE WAS USED IN THE MEDFORD AEROSOL CHARACTERIZARI ON
STUDY TO REPRESENT CEMENT DUST FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
25302 |
25302 |
25302 |
25302 |
25302 |
45 [CHARCOAL (R.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MED FORD AEROSOL
(MFG. (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH A
(TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR FROM A HERCHOFF
(FURNACE.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
cs
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
CHARCOAL MANUFACTURING
3-01-006-01.
NONE
FINE
********* <2,5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.900
7.000
15.000
NA
3.100
5.000
7.400
9.500
NA
0.360
0.028
0.044
0.440
6.400
NA
<
0.054
0.360
NA
<
<
<
0.090
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
0.090
1.800
5.200
6.500
0.300
67.466
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.300
+ - 1.000
+ - 1.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.600
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ - 0.090
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.050
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.900
+ - 0.400
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.200
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
2.400 + -
10.200 + -
21.000 +
NA + -
0.800 + -
0.900 +
3.600 +
12.900 + -
NA + -
0.680 + -
0.040 +
0.050 + -
0.420 + -
6.600 + -
NA + -
< + -
0.022 + -
0.140 + -
NA + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.011 +
NA + -
< + -
NA
NA + -
< +
NA + -
< + -
NA +
< + -
< + -
< + -
NA + -
1.800 + -
5.200 + -
0.600 + -
NA +
66.563
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.300
0.800
10.00
NR
0.100
0.600
0.600
0.800
NR
NR
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.900
0.400
0.100
NR
PROFILE: 25302
RANKING: 2311
RATING ; C
TSP
********* <;3g UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
< -
-I- -
* -
« -
+
+ "
4-
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : HERCHOFF FURNACE. REF. 45
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
25401
21 ISILICA |j.E. CORE, "WILLAMETTE VALLEY FIELD AND
(MFG. [SLASH BURNING IMPACT AIR QUALITY
(SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; VOLUME 3," STATE OF
|OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
|(1979). TABLE 5.2.3.
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THIS STUDY WERE
(TAKEN USING A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR (2.5
|UM, D50) ADAPTED FOR SOURCE TESTING. THE
(SAMPLING TRAIN INCLUDED PROVISION FOR
(DILUTION AIR TO CAPTURE CONDENSIBLES.
(COARSE FRACTION APPROXIMATELY 20 UM, D50.
(SAMPLES ANALYZED BY XRF (5 ELEMENTS), ION
|CHROMATOGRAPHY AND CARBON OXIDATION. THE
(PACS PROFILE SET WAS SUPPLEMENTED WITH TEST
(OF STREET AND SOIL DUST, CHARCOAL MFG, HOG
(FUEL BOILERS AND SILICA MFG AS PART OF THIS
(STUDY. F, NA AND MG WATER SOLUBLE IONS.
I
I
(SILICA MANUFACTURING PROCESS. AVERAGE
(VALUES AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS FROM 3 SOURCE
(TESTS AT THE OUTLET OF A BAGHOUSE. XRF
(ANALYSIS, ONLY.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
n
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SILICA MANUFACTURING
3-05-99-999
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.990
45.320
<
0.140
<
0.280
<
<
0.005
<
<
<
0.160
<
<
0.013
0.003
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
NA
NA
NA
NA
46.911
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.200
+ - 9.120
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-1 OUM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + NR
NA + - NR
< + NR
46.360 + 9.270
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
0.390 + - 0.078
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
46.750
PROFILE: 25401
RANKING: 2224
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+
f
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+
+ -
+ -
» -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COARSE MODE 2.5 - 20 MM. XRF ANALYSIS, ONLY. MEAN AND STD. DEV. OF 3 TESTS.
REF: 21
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
25402
10 (ASPHALT |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
(ROOFING IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
| (STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEG. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
|OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04CMTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NO IR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(ASPHALT ROOFING AND SHINGLES MANUFACTURED BY
(SPRAYING ASPHALT ON FELT. SAMPLES TAKEN
(DOWNSTREAM OF A UNSPECIFIED CONTROL SYSTEM.
(AVERAGE OF 2 SAMPLES.
I
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05X RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
33
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
ASPHALT ROOFING MANUFACTURING
3-05-001-02
UNSPECIFIED CONTROL SYSTEM
FINE
********* <2.5 uM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
<
<
<
<
<
7.600
12.000
0.550
3.400
<
<
<
0.550
0.550
2.100
1.800
<
<
0.550
<
<
<
0.550
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
23.000
1.000
23.000
<
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 7.000
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
+ 0.700
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.300
* 0.300
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
<
<
<
<
<
5.000
12.000
0.550
3.400
<
<
<
0.550
0.550
2.100
1.800
<
<
0.550
<
<
<
0.550
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
23.000
1.000
23.000
<
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 7.000
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.700
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.300
+ - 0.300
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE: 25402
RANKING: 2224
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
< + -
< + -
< *
< + -
< +
7.330 + -
12.000 + -
0.550 + -
3.400 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 +
2.100 + -
1.800 + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.550 + -
< + -
< * -
< + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< * -
23.000 + -
1.000 + -
23.000 + -
< + -
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
7.000
3.000
NR
0.700
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.300
0.300
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
SUM(
69.050
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 10
69.050 69.050
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER jNUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
25403
10 |SPRAY |H.J. TA8ACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
|BOOTH IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
| (STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
| (SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,UKVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10.3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K>. SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
(OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
(ANALYSIS OF ONE SAMPLE TAKEN DOWNSTREAM OF A
(SELF-INDUCED WATER SPRAY CONTROL DEVICE
(SERVING ON AUTOMOTIVE POINT SPRAY BOOTH
((WATER BASE ENAMELS). RESULTS FROM 10 UM
(CYCLONE, ONLY. INSUFFICIENT MASS FOR CARBON
(ANALYSIS. 50% CARBON ESTIMATED BY TABACK
(FROM OTHER LITERATURE. ALL SIZE FRACTIONS
(ASSUMED SIMILAR. POOR QUALITY DATA.
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1X). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-8S
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAINT SPRAY
4-02-001-01
WATER SPRAY
BOOTH
BOOTH
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
<
0.660
<
<
0.550
<
3.000
<
0.050
<
0.550
<
0.050
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
40.000
10.000
2.000
0.050
57.110
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NR +
NR +
NR + -
< 4- -
< + -
0.660 i- -
< -i- -
< 4 -
0.550 +
< + -
3.000 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< -f -
0.550 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< 4-
< +
0.050 + -
< 4
< 4 -
< +>
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< 4 -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
40.000 + -
10.000 + -
2.000 . + -
0.050 + -
57.110
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 25403
RANKING: 2121
RATING : 0
TSP
********* <3o UM
X BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA 4 -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
< + -
< 4 -
0.660 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
< 4 -
3.000 + -
< 4 -
0.050 + -
< 4- -
0.550 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 4 -
0.050 + -
< 4 -
< 4 -
< 4 -
< 4- -
0.050 + -
< 4 -
< 4
< 4- -
< 4- -
0.050 + -
< 4 -
< 4 -
< + -
< 4- -
< 4- -
< 4 -
< + -
40.000 +
10.000 4 -
2.000 + -
0.050 + -
57.110
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA - NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : TC AND OC VALUES ARE ESTIMATED, NOT MEASURED. S ESTIMATED AS 1/3 OF S04.
REF. 10 ALL SIZE FRACTIONS ASUMED SIMILAR.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
25404
10 [FERTILIZED..!. TABACK, A.R. BRIEKZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
IHFG |BRUNETZ,H FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
[STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
[SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
[5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
[ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
[OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
[SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
[HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE.3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
[IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOICINETICALLY. CYCLONE
[AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
[(ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
[OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
|BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
[OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
[SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
[METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NOIR
[DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
[OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
[LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
[REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
[REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
[RAW MATERIALS ARE WEIGHED, CRUSHED AND
[PRESSED INTO GRANULES WHICH ARE THEN DRIED
[IN A ROTORY KILN. KILN EMISSIONS
[PASS THRU A CYCLONE AND BAGHOUSE. AVERAGE
[OF TWO SAMPLES TAKEN AT BAGHOUSE EXIT. UREA
[AND PHOSPHOROUS WERE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE
[PROFILE, BUT WERE NOT REPORTED.
I
[NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
[0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
[DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
|ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
Tl
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
UREA FERTILIZER PRODUCTION
3-01-040-01
CYCLONE & BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.s UM
X BY WT + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
1.300 + -
11.000 + -
0.550 +
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
< * -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 +
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
31.000 + -
2.000 + -
4.000 + -
0.550 + -
51.400
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
2.000 + -
7.000 +
0.550 +
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< * -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
31.000 * -
2.000 + -
6.000 +
0.550 + -
50.050
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2.600
5.000
0.550
0.550
<
<
<
<
0.050
0.050
<
0.050
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
0.050
0.050
<
0.050
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
31.000
2.000
8.000
0.550
50.700
25404
2221
0
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AVERAGE OF TWO TESTS. A MAJOR COMPONENT, UREA, NOT REPORTED. REF. 10
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFIIE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
25405
10 (BORIC (H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
(ACID (BRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(MFC (STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
|5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
[HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|DM 050) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI.P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
|OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT ISO DEG.C WERE
|ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(H2S04 IS USED TO REDUCE BORAX TO BORIC ACID
(AND GLAUBER SALT (NA2S04. 10 H20). BORIC
(ACID CAKE IS THEN RECRYSTALIZED, DRIED AND
(SCREENED AS IS THE GLAUBER SALT. PROFILE IS
(AN AVERAGE OF 2 TESTS AT THE OUTLET OF THE
(BORIC ACID DRIER BAGHOUSE.
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
8
F
NA
MG
At
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
BORIC ACID MANUFACTURING
3-01-999-99
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2-5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
77.640
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
<
0.660
0.550
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
0.550
<
0.050
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
3.900
0.100
2.000
0.550
86.250
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA * -
77.640 +
NA *
NR +
NR +
NR + -
< + -
< + -
0.660 +
0.550 + -
< + -
0.050 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
< +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
< +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
3.900 + -
0.100 + -
2.000 +
0.550 + -
86.250
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 25405
RANKING: 2221
RATING : D
TSP
********* <30 UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
77.640 + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< + -
< + -
0.660 + -
0.550 + -
< +
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -f -
< +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< -i- -
< * -
3.900 +
0.100 + -
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
86.250
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : BORON VALUE CALCULATED FROM ORIGINAL DATA THAT REPORTED 98% OF
EMISSIONS OR H3B03. S ESTIMATED FROM S04. NEARLY A PURE BORON SOURCE. REF. 10
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
I
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
25406
'46,54 ICARBOR- |J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
IUNDUM (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
|FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
|IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
[GRADUATE CENTER{1979)
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
|(2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
|NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
|CARBON OXIDATION(CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
[SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
[SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
[UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
(MANUFACTURE OF SILICON CARBIDE. COKE IS
(LAID OUT BETWEEN TWO ELECTRODES AND COVERED
[WITH SAND. CURRENT IS APPLIED AND AFTER 17
[HOURS OF COOKING, THE SIDE AND RESIDUAL SAND
(IS PULLED AWAY TO EXPOSE THE SILICON CARBIDE
(INGOT. FREQUENTLY (2-3/HRS) THERE IS AN
[UNUSUAL BUILDUP OF S! VAPORS AND A BLOWOUT
[OCCURS. SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED FROM A
(PLATFORM IN THE ROOF EXHAUST VENT. THERE IS
[NO CONTROL AND THE SAMPLED AEROSOL
(REPRESENTS WHAT IS EMITTED TO THE AIR.
[AVERAGE OF FOUR SAMPLES FROM THE BURN CYCLE
[AND BOTTOM REMOVAL. SAMPLES ARE ALL FROM
(THE SAME PLANT.EC,OC DATA REVISED BY SHAH,
IREF. 54.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
CARBORUNDUM MANUFACTURING
3-05-009-99
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
0.050
0.120
0.780
0.350
3.500
<
4.800
1.700
0.790
0.140
<
0.014
0.007
0.009
0.035
0.330
<
0.004
0.019
0.004
<
<
<
<
0.017
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
21.400
13.670
16.000
1.600
65.339
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ 0.100
+ 1.200
+ - 0.400
+ 4.300
+ - NR
+ - 6.600
+ - 1.500
+ 1.100
+ - 0.130
+ - NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.610
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.010
+ - 7.400
+ 13.00
+ - 25.00
* - 2.100
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.260 +
< +
2.800 + -
12.000 +
< +
0.410 + -
0.990 + -
0.720 + -
0.570 + -
< + -
0.033 + -
0.012 +
0.004 + -
0.029 + -
0.270 + -
< ' + -
0.017 + -
0.055 + -
< +
< + -
< 4- -
< + -
< + -
0.011 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< -I- -
< * -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
4.600 + -
24.000 + -
1.600 + -
0.830 + -
49.211
NR
NR
0.400
0.170
0.400
4.300
15.00
NR
0.310
0.430
1.100
0.490
NR
0.490
0.010
0.007
0.025
0.210
NR
0.230
0.018
0.010
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.009
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.010
2.300
15.00
1.830
0.480
PROFILE: 25406
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3g UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
f
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46. FRACTION EC.OC CORRECTED BY SHAW. REF. 54.
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
25407 | 44 (PHOSPHU- |D. HAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (ELEMENTAL PHOSPHOROUS PLANT. PLUME SAMPLE
25407 | (ROUS (CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE,"STATE OF MONTANA (COLLECTED WITH A LOU-VOLUME SAMPLER AND
25407 | (PLANT (DEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) (AIRCRAFT.
25407 ((I |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
46
47
48
50
51
49
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUNK % )
NOTES:
SOURCE: PHOSPHROUS PLANT PLUME
SCC: 3-01-999-99
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC % BY UT +- UNC
BE + - + -
B + - + -
F + +
NA + - + -
MG + - + -
AL + - + -
SI + - + -
P + - + -
S + - + -
CL + - + -
K + + -
CA + + -
SC + + -
TI * - + -
V + - + -
CR + - + -
MN + - + -
FE + - * -
CO + - + -
NI + - + -
CU + + -
ZN + - + -
GA + - + -
GE + + -
AS + - + -
SE + + -
BR + - + -
RB + + -
SR + - + -
PD *> - + -
AG + + -
CD + - + -
SN + - + -
SB + - + -
IN + - + -
BA + - + -
CE + - + -
HG + + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - +
N03 + - + -
0.000 0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 25407
RANKING: 2311
RATING : 0
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY WT *-
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
1.250 +
2.790 + -
3.400 +
0.300 + -
0.040 + -
0.340 +
0.940 + -
< + -
0.018 + -
< + -
0.015 +
< + -
0.260 t -
< -i- -
< +
< +
0.220 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.012 + -
< + -
< + -
0.013 + -
0.021 + -
0.030 + -
0.041 + -
0.130 + -
0.100 + -
0.090 + -
0.700 + -
< + -
< + -
0.040 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
10.750
NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.250
1.540
0.300
0.090
0.030
0.060
0.280
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.060
NR
NR
NR
0.030
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.015
0.040
0.060
0.083
0.110
0.210
0.093
0.600
NR
NR
0.030
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 44.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
26101
10 (REFINERY |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
|PROCESS IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
|HEATERS (STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
(OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
|METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
(NATURAL GAS-FIRED PROCESS HEATER (1
(SAMPLE). FRACTION <1UM WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE
(WITH SUFFICIENT MASS FOR ANALYSIS. ALL
(FRACTION ASSUMED OF SIMILAR COMPOSITION
(BASED ON MASS DISTRIBUTION.
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05X RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
|ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
REFINERY PROCESS HEATERS (GAS)
3-06-001-02
NONE
FINE
********* <2-s UM
X BY WT + -
NA + -
NA -i- -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< +
< + -
15.600 + -
< + -
< +
5.000 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
2.000 + -
0.550 +
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< +
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
7.000 + -
< + -
47.000 + -
0.550 + -
64.600
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< + -
< + -
15.600 + -
< +
< + -
5.000 + -
< + -
< *
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 t- -
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
< +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
7.000 +
< + -
47.000 + -
0.550 + -
64.600
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
26101
2221
D
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE j
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
26202
26202
26202
26202
26202
26202
26202
52 (REFINING-(J.E. HOWES,J.A.COOPER AND J.E.
|CATALYTIC|HOUCK,"SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE
(CRACKER (SOURCE SIGNATURES IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA,1
| (DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO US EPA ENVIRON.
| (SCIENCE RES. LAB. RTP, N.C. BY NEA,
| |INC.(1983)
(CATALYTIC CRACKER WITH NIGERIAN/NORTH SLOPE
(FEEDSTOCK CRUDE. ESP CONTROLS. CATALYST IS
(33% AL203 CONTAINING 501 PPM NI AND 650 PPM
(V. SAMPLE COLLECTED WITH DILUTION SAMPLER.
(REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE FROM A GROUP OF 9. XRF
(ANALYSIS AND ANALYTICAL UNCERTAINTIES.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
<
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PETROLEUM REFINERY CATALYTIC CRACKER
3-06-002-01
ESP
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.968
11.796
0.000
4.511
0.000
0.038
0.036
<
0.117
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.247
<
0.027
0.003
0.005
0.002
<
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.001
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.002
<
0.000
0.246
0.000
0.008
NA
NA
NA
NA
22.015
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.227
+ 0.537
+ - 0.074
+ - 0.209
+ 0.052
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.002
+ - NR
+ - 0.053
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.011
+ 0.003
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
» 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.002
+ 0.003
+ - 0.005
+ - NR
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23.469
50.570
0.000
2.237
0.000
0.117
0.155
<
0.117
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.567
<
0.059
0.005
0.012
0.005
<
0.000
0.007
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.026
0.045
0.019
0.000
0.000
<
0.308
0.645
0.006
0.023
NA
NA
NA
NA
78.404
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 1.914
+ - 4.227
+ - 0.315
+ - 0.750
+ - 0.183
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.018
+ - NR
+ - 0.275
+ - 0.121
+ - 0.055
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.067
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.002
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.022
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.042
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - 0.196
+ - 0.334
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 26202
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q (JM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
*
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COARSE FRACTION 2.5-7.0 UM, D50. REF. 52.
SEMIQUANTITATIVE XRF ANALYSIS INDICATED ABOUT 0.2% ND AND 0.2% CE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
27102 49 (GLASS |J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH, (GLASS MELTING FURNACE AT A RECYCLING PLANT.
27102 |FURNACE |SEATTLE-TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION (AVERAGE OF THREE REPLICATE SAMPLES COLLECTED
27102 (STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORTF TO THE PUGET (WITH DILUTION SAMPLER. NO CONTROL
27102 (SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA.INC. (EQUIPMENT. NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRICALLY
27102 (1983. (FIRED; EMERALD GREEN GLASS BEING FIRED
27102 | (DURING TEST PERIOD. RAW MATERIALS TO
27102 | (FURNACE INCLUDED SILICA SAND, LIMESTONE,
27102 | (SODA ASH AND RECYCLED GLASS. SIX TYPES OF
27102 | (GLASS PRODUCED AT PLANT: FLINT, AMBER,
27102 | [EMERALD GREEN, CHAMPAGNE GREEN, SMOKEY
27102 | [GREEN, AND DEAD LEAF GREEN. SELENIUM FLUX
27102 | (USED AS A DECOLORIZING AGENT.
27102 |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
sec*
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
42
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
MO
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
GLASS FURNACE
3-05-014-02
NONE
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
FINE COARSE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** *********
X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC X BY WT
0.003
0.010
0.027
12.800
0.183
0.011
0.320
0.025
17.600
0.016
1.800
0.427
<
0.004
0.006
0.215
0.003
0.026
0.020
0.004
0.001
0.022
<
<
0.023
0.014
0.004
0.013
0.003
0.042
0.001
0.003
0.015
0.002
<
0.003
<
<
0.195
0.710
0.062
48.900
0.015
65.928
+ - 0.003 +
+ - 0.010 + -
+ - 0.006 +
+ - 1.280 + -
+ 0.018 + -
+ - 0.011 ' +
+ - 0.060 + -
+ 0.025 +
+ - 1.760 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ 0.180 «
+ - 0.043 +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.021 +
+ - 0.001 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ - 0.020 +
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - 0.002 +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.002 + -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.004 + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ - 0.002 * -
+ - 0.003 + -
+ - 0.002 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.001 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.019 + -
+ - 0.080 + -
+ - 0.080 + -
+ 7.300 + -
+ 0.003 + -
0.000
NA
NA
0.025
NA
NA
0.028
0.347
0.032
17.512
0.020
1.835
0.461
<
0.005
0.006
0.218
0.003
0.034
<
0.004
0.001
0.023
<
<
0.023
0.014
0.004
0.013
0.003
0.044
0.001
0.003
0.014
0.002
<
0.009
<
<
0.194
1.050
0.154
50.341
0.018
54.929
27102
3324
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.005
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.055
+ 0.024
+ - 1.751
+ 0.007
+ - 0.183
+ 0.046
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.022
+ NR
+ - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.002
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - O.C02
+ 0.003
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.003
+ 0.003
+ - NR
+ - 0.008
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.105
+ - 0.105
+ - 6.579
+ - 0.006
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 49.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
27201
10 |CEMENT |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N. (AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES TAKEN DOWNSTREAM OF A
|KILN IBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM (GAS-FILED ROTARY KILN BAGHOUSE
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE |
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO | |
|5806-783<1979). NTIS #PB 293923. |
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM 050) AT 400 DEC. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
IIMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
|BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
(OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
|0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
205
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
C03
CEMENT KILN (GAS - FIRED)
3-05-016-03
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + NR
NA + - NR
NA + NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
2.400 + 0.400
< + - NR
2.400 + - 0.400
16.100 * 3.000
< + - NR
0.550 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
,< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
4.270 + - NR
0.550 + - NR
< + - NR
23.870
PROFILE: 27201
RANKING: 2221
RATING : D
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NA + - NR
NR * - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< « - NR
< + NR
1.500 + - 0.300
22.000 + - 3.000
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
0.550 + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
2.660 + - NR
NA + - NR
1.680 + - NR
0.550 + - NR
8.100 + NR
28.940
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NR +
NR . +
NR + -
< + -
< + -
2.200 + -
< + -
1.400 +
27.000 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
0.550 + -
< + -
1.200 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
3.220 +
NA + -
1.260 + -
0.550 + -
8.790 + -
35.180
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.800
NR
0.300
3.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAU DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 10
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
27203 |
27203 |
27203 |
27203 |
27203 |
27203 |
27203 |
49 (CEMENT
(KILN
I
I
I
I
I
|J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH,
| SEATTLE -TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION
(STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORTF TO THE PUGET
(SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA.INC.
(1983.
I
I
(AVERAGE OF TWO REPLICATE SAMPLES COLLECTED
(FROM A SINGLE STACK. FUEL BEING USED AT THE
(TIME OF SAMPLING WAS COAL. STACK EQUIPPED
[WITH MULTICYCLONE AND AN ESP. EMISSIONS
(SAMPLED WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER EQUIPPED
(WITH A TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
56
57
80
82
83
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
BA
LA
HG
PB
BI
OC
EC
S04
N03
CEMENT KILN (COAL FIRED)
3-05-007-06
ESP
*********
% BY WT
0.020
0.050
0.200
2.290
0.240
4.280
8.440
0.017
6.800
7.800
5.400
10.000
0.298
0.010
0.027
0.034
0.930
0.100
0.093
0.023
0.217
0.004
0.010
0.020
0.075
0.032
0.006
0.016
0.005
0.006
0.016
0.006
0.004
0.034
0.024
0.001
1.820
1.000
5.400
0.200
18.300
0.200
74.448
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.028
+ 0.460
+ 0.024
+ 0.430
+ - 0.844
+ - 0.075
+ - 1.400
+ - 1.900
+ - 1.500
+ - 1.300
+ - 0.036
+ 0.002
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.140
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.096
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.022
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.019
* - 0.003
+ - 0.009
+ - 0.015
+ 0.009
+ 0.004
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.024
+ 0.001
+ - 0.280
+ - 1.000
+ - 0.600
+ - 0.400
* - 6.400
+ 0.040
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA * -
NA +
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA -f
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
0.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
27203
3324
B
TSP
********* <3(j UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA
NA
0.200
NA
NA
4.106
8.896
0.029
5.000
4.392
3.792
14.800
0.302
0.011
0.016
0.027
1.038
NA
0.043
0.017
0.203
0.005
0.009
0.012
0.055
0.037
0.004
0.018
0.003
0.003
0.010
0.004
0.004
0.026
0.025
0.001
1.346
NA
6.654
0.188
14.520
0.740
66.536
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.109
+ " NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.411
+ 1.362
+ - 0.049
+ 0.912
+ - 0.771
+ 0.622
+ - 1.480
+ 0.032
+ 0.001
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.104
+ NR
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.018
+ NR
+ - 0.136
+ - NR
+ - 0.665
+ - 0.288
+ - 7.642
+ 0.660
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :REF. 49.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
27501
10 |GYPSUM |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA,J.F. MACKO AND N.
|CALCINING|BRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
|STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
|SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
|5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
[OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
|SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
|HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEG. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
IIMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
|AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
JOCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
|BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
IOCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04CMTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIOATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
(CALCINATION OF GYPSUM IS THE HEATING OF
(CAS04.2H20 TO PRODUCE ANHYDROUS CALCIUM
(SULFATE USED IN WALL PLASTER AND OTHER
(PRODUCTS. GYPSUM IS HEATED IN NATURAL
(GAS-FIRED ROTARY KILN. RESULTS FROM ONE
(SAMPLE TAKEN DOWNSTREAM OF A BAGHOUSE.
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10.1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
202
203
204
205
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
TC
EC
S04
N03
C03
GYPSUM CALCINER
3-05-015-02
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
<
13.660
0.550
0.550
13.000
<
<
<
0.550
0.050
0.550
<
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
0.050
0.050
<
0.050
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.050
1.000
NA
41.000
0.050
<
58.200
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
< +
< + -
19.000 +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.900 * -
< + -
< + -
< +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
< +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 * -
< +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
< -i- -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
NA + -
57.000 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
59.550
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
<
18.300
0.550
0.550
12.000
<
<
<
0.550
0.050
0.550
<
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
0.050
0.050
<
<
0.050
<,
<
0.050
<
<
<
0.050
<
<
0.050
2.000
NA
55.000
0.050
0.550
72.250
27501
2221
D
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : '45,34 AND 31X OF FINE,COARSE AND TSP REPORTED TO BE 0,NA,MG AND AL.
REF. 10
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE TERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
28201 |
28201 |
28201 |
28201 |
28201 |
28201 |
47 (STEEL (TETSUO MAMURO,ARIKA MIZOHATA AND TAR AH IDE
(PRODUCT. | KUBOTA, "ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF SUSPENDED
| (PARTICLES RELEASED FFROM IRON AND STEEL
| (WORKS," ANNUAL REPORT OF THE RADIATION
| (CENTER OF OSAKA PREFECTURE. VOL 20(1979)
I I
|GEO. MEAN OF 3 TESTS DURING MELTING,
(REFINING/DISCHARGE.
I
I
I
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: CAST IRON INDUCTION FURNACE
SCC: 3-04-003-03
CONTROLS: UNSPECIFIED
SPECIES !
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME X BY UT + UNC X BY UT +- UNC
BE + - + -
B + - +
F + - + -
NA + - + -
MG + - + -
AL + *
SI + + -
P + - + -
S + - +
CL + - + -
K + - +
CA + - + -
SC + - + -
TI + - + -
V + - + -
CR + - + -
MN + - + -
FE + +
CO + - + -
NI + + -
CU + - + -
ZN + - + -
GA + - + -
GE + - + -
AS + - +
SE + - +
BR + - +
RB + - + -
SR + - + -
ZR + - + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
SN + - + -
SB + - + -
CS + - + -
BA + +
CE + - +
HG + - + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - + -
N03 + - + -
0.000 0.000
PROFILE: 28201
RANKING: 1324
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY UT «-
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
2.000 + -
< +
1.300 +
2.100 + -
< +
< +
2.500 +
3.200 + -
1.500 +
< +
0.480 + -
0.006 + -
0.024 + -
1.700 +
5.700 + -
0.002 + -
0.098 + -
0.120 + -
2.900 + -
< + -
< +
0.012 + -
< + -
0.021 + -
0.011 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.012 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.540 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
24.226
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 47.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28202
28202
28202
28202
28202
28202
47 [IRON ITETSUO MAMURO.ARIKA MIZOHATA AND TAR AH IDE
| PRODUCT. | KUBOTA, "ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF SUSPENDED
| (PARTICLES RELEASED FFROM IRON AND STEEL
| (WORKS," ANNUAL REPORT OF THE RADIATION
| (CENTER OF OSAKA PREFECTURE. VOL 20(1979)
I I
(CAST
IRON
CUPOLA .
GEO
|XRF AND INAA ANALYSIS.
(COKE
I
I
I
AND
LIMESTONE
RAW
MEAN OF 5 TESTS
SCRAP IRON, PIG
MATERIALS.
.
IRON,
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: CAST IRON CUPOLA
SCC: 3-04-003-01
CONTROLS: UNSPECIFIED
PROFILE: 28202
RANKING: 1324
RATING : C
FINE COARSE TSP
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM
NUMBER NAME X BY UT + - UNC X BY WT + UNC X BY UT +-
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE * -
B + -
f + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL « -
SI + -
P + -
S « -
CL + -
K +
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR +
MN +
FE +
CO + -
NI +
CU + -
ZN + -
GA +
GE + -
AS +
SE + -
BR + -
RB + -
SR + -
ZR + "
AG + -
CO + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS +
BA + -
CE + -
KG + -
PB + -
OC + -
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
+ - NA + -
+ - NA +
+ NA + -
+ 1.300 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 1.100 + -
+ 24.000 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 2.300 + -
+ - 0.890 + -
+ 3.000 + -
+ - 1.000 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.060 + -
+ - 0.009 + -
+ 0.052 * -
+ - 4.500 + -
+ - 15.000 + -
+ - 0.004 + -
+ 0.035 + -
+ - 0.260 + -
+ - 0.830 + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.013 + -
+ - 0.002 + -
+ - 0.009 + -
+ - 0.022 + -
+ - < + -
+ < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.370 + -
+ < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.230 + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA +
0.000 52.686
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 47.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
28301
10 (SINTER |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
(PLANT (BRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES <10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEG. F. MI LII PORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
(OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(A 5000 TON/DAY SINTER PLANT RECYCLING
(IRON-BEARING MATERIALS TO BE ADDED TO THE
(BLAST FURNACE CHARGE. AVERAGE VALUES FOR 2
(TESTS TAKEN DOWNSTREAM OF A BAGHOUSE.
I
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
|ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
8
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
cs
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
STEEL PRODUCTION - STEEL SINTER PLANT
3-03-008-03
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
6.600
17.000
20.000
0.550
<
<
0.550
3.000
0.550
13.000
<
0.550
2.000
0.550
<
<
0.550
0.050
0.550
0.550
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.550
0.050
0.050
<
<
0.550
<
11.000
NA
NA
20.000
NA
91.800
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY UT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
< + -
2.600 + -
14.000 + -
9.000 + -
1.000 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
20.000 + -
< -i- -
< +
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 +
0.550 + -
< +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
0.550 + -
< +
13.000 + -
NA + -
NA +
8.000 + -
NA + -
71.500
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 28301
RANKING: 2121
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY UT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NR + -
NR * -
NR +
< + -
6.330 + -
28.000 +
19.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
3.000 + -
0.550 + -
14.000 +
< * -
< +
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
< +
< + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
0.550 +
< +
< + -
< +
< + -
0.550 + -
< +
10.000 + -
NA + -
NA +
19.000 + -
NA + -
99.600
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : ABOUT 10% TOTAL CARBON, 5% OTHERS (SI, AL, MG, F). TSP FRACTION.
REF. 10 ABOUT 15% TOTAL CARBON, 40% OTHER (SI, AL, MG, F) FINE FRACTION.
-------
21-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
STEEL PRODUCTION OPEN HEARTH FURNANCE
3-03-009-01
ESP
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
13.300
<
5.000
0.550
<
<
0.550
2.000
0.550
11.000
<
0.550
0.550
<
<
<
0.050
<
0.050
0.050
<
<
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
0.550
NA
NA
40.000
0.550
62.200
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< + -
3.000 + -
< + -
5.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< *
0.550 +
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
16.000 + -
< + -
0.550 +
0.550 + -
< 4- -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
NA + -
NA +
35.000 + -
0.550 + -
60.750
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
<
13.300
<
5.000
0.550
<
<
0.550
2.000
0.550
11.000
<
0.550
0.550
<
<
<
0.050
<
0.050
0.050
<
<
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
<
<
<
<
0.550
NA
NA
40.000
0.550
62.200
28302
2121
D
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 20% CARBON, 22-26% OTHER (SI, OZ, AL, MG) TSP AND COARSE. REF. 10
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZK
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
STEEL PRODUCTION - OPEN HEARTH FURNANCE
3-03-009-01
ESP
FINE
********* <2.s UM
X BY WT + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< + -
13.300 t-
< + -
5.000 +
0.550 + -
< + -
< 4- -
0.550 + -
2.000 * -
0.550 + -
11.000 + -
< + -
0.550 +
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< +
0.050 +
0.050 + -
0.050 +
0.050 +
< + -
< -f -
< +
< +
0.550 + -
NA + -
NA + -
40.000 + -
0.550 + -
62.200
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-1QUM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR +
NR +
< + -
3.000 +
< + -
5.000 +
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
16.000 + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
NA + -
NA + -
35.000 + -
0.550 + -
60.750
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 28302
RANKING: 2121
RATING : D
TSP
********* <30 UM
X BY WT +-
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
< + -
13.300 + -
< + -
5.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
11.000 + -
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< « -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
0.550 + -
NA +
NA + -
40.000 + -
0.550 + -
62.200
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : 20X CARBON, 22-26% OTHER (SI, OZ, AL, MG) TSP AND COARSE. REF. 20
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
STEEL PRODUCTION - BASIC OXYGEN FURNANCE
3-03-009-03
ESP
FINE
********* <2.5 UM
X BY WT +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NR (
NR + -
9.900 + -
< +
13.330 + -
< + -
5.000 +
0.550 + -
< +
< + -
0.550 + -
2.000 + -
0.550 +
11.000 +
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
0.050 +
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< +
< * -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
20.000 + -
< + -
40.000 + -
0.550 +
92.100
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NR + -
NR + -
9.900 + -
< +
13.330 + -
< -f -
5.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 +
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
11.000 +
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 +
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 +
20.000 +
< *
40.000 + -
0.550 + -
92.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 28303
RANKING: 2231
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +-
NA * -
NA « -
NA +
NA + -
NR + -
NR +
9.900 +
< + -
13.330 + -
< + -
5.000 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
0.550 + -
2.000 + -
0.550 + -
11.000 +
< + -
0.550 + -
0.550 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
< -i-
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< 4- -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< + -
< » -
< + -
0.550 +
20.000 + -
< + -
40.000 + -
0.550 + -
92.100
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : ALL SIZE FRACTIONS PROFILES ASSUMED SIMILAR. REF. 10, APPENDIX A.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
28302
10, |OPEN |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
INEARTH JBRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(FURNACE (STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
(5806-783(1979). NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM 050) AT 400 DEG. F. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
IIMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
|OCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
(OXYGEN LANCE OPEN HEARTH FURNACE. S
(ESTIMATED AS 1/3 OF S04. SCRAP IRON STEEL
(AND PIG IRON ARE HEATED IN A SHALLOW
(OIL-FIRED HEARTH . FLOURINE -BEARING ORES
(ARE USED IN THE CHARGE. AVERAGE OF 2 TESTS
(TAKEN DOWNSTREAM OF AN ESP.
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
R8
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
STEEL ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
3-04-007-01
8AGHOUSE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
1.260
6.500
0.650
5.000
<
1.960
1.850
0.920
6.200
<
0.200
0.060
2.100
8.700
32.000
<
0.700
0.280
1.200
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.760
NA
NA
2.500
NA
72.840
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.480
+ - 0.710
+ 0.160
+ - 0.210
+ NR
+ - 0.070
+ 0.780
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.570
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
* - 0.010
+ 1.400
+ - 0.900
+ - 3.000
+ NR
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.120
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ . 0.070
» - NR
+ NR
+ 1.300
+ - 1.400
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
1.260 + -
6.500 + -
0.650 + -
5.000 + -
< + -
1.950 + -
1.850 + -
0.920 +
6.200 + -
< + -
0.200 + -
0.060 + -
2.100 + -
8.700 + -
32.000 +
< +
0.700 + -
0.280 + -
1.200 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.760 + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.500 * -
NA + -
72.830
NR
NR
0.500
0.480
0.710
0.160
0.210
NR
0.070
0.780
0.070
0.570
NR
0.020
0.010
1.400
0.900
3.000
NR
0.070
0.030
0.120
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.070
NR
NR
1.300
1.400
PROFILE: 28304
RANKING: 3324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UK ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
4-
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
* -
+ .
+ .
+ .
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF1IE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
28303
10 |STEEL BOF|H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
[FURNACE IBRUNETZ," FIHE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
|5806-783(1979>. NTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
(HEATED METHOD 5 PROBE,3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 DEC. f. MILLIPORE FILTERS AND
IIMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
(OCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
IOCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL,SI,MG,0) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
|BOF FURNACE . S ESTIMATED AS 1/3 OF S04.
(COMPOSITION OF ALL 3 FRACTIONS ASSUMED
(SIMILAR BASED ON SIZE DISTRIBUTION,
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(0) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
(ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-JUO-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
sc
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
FERROMANGANESE FURNACE
3-03-007-01
BAGHOUSE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.290
3.100
<
0.640
0.990
<
1.700
0.420
10.500
1.300
<
0.046
0.024
0.042
17.300
2.100
<
<
0.036
0.580
<
<
<
<
0.160
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.045
9.000
1.500
4.200
5.700
59.673
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.080
+ 0.300
+ - 4.000
+ - 0.130
+ - Q.300
+ - NR
+ - 0.350
+ 0.160
+ - 3.900
* - 0.140
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.990
+ - 1.400
+ - NR
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.250
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.220
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.090
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.400
* - 2.800
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.290
3.100
<
0.640
0.990
<
1.700
0.420
10.500
1.300
<
0.046
0.024
0.042
17.300
2.100
<
<
0.036
0.580
<
<
<
<
0.160
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.045
9.000
1.500
4.200
5.700
59.673
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.080
+ 0.300
+ 4.000
+ - 0.130
+ - 0.300
+ - NR
+ - 0.350
+ - 0.160
+ - 3.900
+ - 0.140
+ - NR
+ 0.007
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.003
+ 0.990
+ - 1.400
+ NR
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.250
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ 0.220
t- - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ 0.090
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.400
+ - 2.800
PROFILE: 28401
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q u^ ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
4- -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+
f
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
28304
46 [STEEL- |J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
(ELECTRIC (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
(ARC FUR- |FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
|NACE (IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM A
(STEEL ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE SAGHOUSE
(EMISSIONS.
I
I
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
|<2.0 UM 050) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OX1DATION(CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: STEEL FOUNDRY - STEEL HEAT TREATING (SALT QUENCH) PROFILE: 28601
SCC: 3-04-007-04 RANKING: 2221
CONTROLS: NONE RATING : C
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SPECIES *********
NAME X BY UT
BE
B
f
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON
FINE COARSE TSP
<2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM
+ - UNC X BY WT + UNC X BY WT +-
+ + - NA + -
+ - + NA + -
+ - + - NA +
+ - + - NR + -
+ - + - NR +
+ - + NR + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ ' + - < + -
+ - * - 30.000 + -
+ - + - 4.000 + -
+ + - 0.550 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + < + -
+ - + - 0.550 + -
f + < + -
+ - + - 9.000 + -
+ - + - < + .
+ - + - 2.000 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - * - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ + < +
+ - + - < + .
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - 0.550 + -
+ - + - < + .
+ + - < + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ + - 6.000 + -
+ - + - NA + -
+ - + - 32.000 + -
+ - + - 0.550 + -
0.000 85.450
: EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : ABOUT 16% NA, SI, 0. REF 10.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER [GROUP [
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28401
28401
28401
23401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
28401
46 |FERROMAN-|J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
IGANESE (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
(FURNACE |FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTI OILATE MATTER
|IN PORTLAND.OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES FROM ONE SOURCE.
I
I
I
[PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
|(2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
|NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATION
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: ALUMINUM PROCESSING
SCC: 3-03-001-07
CONTROLS: BAGHOUSE
FINE
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ******
NUMBER NAME X BY WT + - UNC
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< X )
NOTES: OC
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
= ORGANIC
NA
NA
6.000
4.100
2.800
27.000
0.340
<
1.400
1.330
0.220
0.330
<
0.040
0.064
<
0.011
0.450
<
0.190
0.044
0.015
<
<
<
<
0.037
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.012
3.900
2.300
4.400
0.410
55.393
CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 2.300
+ - 1.700
* - 1.800
+ - 8.000
+ - 0.340
+ - NR
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.840
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.036
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.290
+ NR
+ - 0.085
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.011
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.054
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 3.900
+ - 1.000
+ - 3.900
+ - 0.180
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
4.200
2.400
2.700
31 .300
0.097
<
<
1.200
<
0.810
<
0.076
0.040
0.016
<
0.380
<
0.210
0.140
0.009
<
<
<
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
1.600
1.700
NA
46.998
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.900
+ - 0.600
+ 0.550
+ - 4.900
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - 0.300
+ 0.150
+ 0.100
+ 0.340
+ - NR
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.150
+ NR
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.200
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 2.000
+ - 1.500
+ - 1.100
* - 2.000
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 29101
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
*
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
4- -
+ .
* -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
* -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+
+
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
4- -
+ .
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46. EC.OC DATA UPDATED BY SHAH, REF. 54.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
28601
10 (STEEL |H.J. TABACK, A.R. BRIENZA.J.F. MACKO AND N.
(TREATING (BRUNETZ," FINE PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM
(STATIONARY AND MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES IN THE
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN,"KVB CORP. NO
15806-783(1979). MTIS #PB 293923.
I
(ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE WERE
(OBTAINED USING THE EPA SOURCE ASSESSMENT
(SAMPLING SYSTEM (SASS) TRAIN EQUIPPED WITH A
IHEATEO METHOD 5 PROBE.3 CYCLONES (10,3 AND 1
|UM D50) AT 400 OEG. F. MILL IPORE FILTERS AND
(IMPINGERS OPERATED ISOKINETICALLY. CYCLONE
(AND FILTER CATCHES WERE ANALYZED BY XRF
((ELEMENTS) > AT. NO. 19 (K). SI,P AND S WERE
IOCASSIONALLY REPORTED BUT RESULTS SHOULD NOT
(BE CONSIDERED QUANTITATIVE. AA WAS
IOCASSIONALLY USED AS A QA MEASURE. WATER
(SOLUBLE S04(MTB METHOD) , N03 (DIAZO DYE
(METHOD) AND CARBON (OXIDATION/NDIR
(DETECTION); CARBONATE AND "VOLATILE" CARBON
(OXIDIZED AT 150 DEG.C WERE
(ROUTINE.UNFORTUANTELY, SEVERAL OF THE
(LIGHTER ELEMENTS (AL.SI.MG.O) WERE OFTEN
(REPORTED AS A SUM. THIS DOCUMENT IS
(REPRESENTS A RICH SOURCE OF INFORMATION.
I
(STEEL HEATING TREATING PROCESS EMISSIONS AT
(OUTLET OF A BAGHOUSE. PROCESS INVOLVES
(DIPPING HEATED STEEL IN TANKS OF LIQUID SALT
|AT 1620 DEC. F. AND WATER QUENCHING.
(AVERAGE VALUES FFROM 2 TESTS . NO CONTROL
(SYSTEM
I
(NOTE: ORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED AS
|TRACE(T)(0.1-1.0%) OR BELOW DETECTION LIMITS
|(D) (<0.1%). MID-RANGE VALUES OF 0.55 AND
(0.05% RESPECTIVELY WERE SUBSTITUTED IN THIS
(DOCUMENT FOR ALL PROFILES FROM THIS REFERENCE
IORIGIONAL DATA REPORTED IN FOUR SIZE RANGES
| >10,3-10,1-3,<1 UM. TSP PROFILE IS KVB
(COMPOSITE PROFILE.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
40
42
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
57
80
82
83
200
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
BI
TC
OC
EC
S04
N03
ALUMINUM REDUCTION POTLINE
3-03-001-07
; NONE
*********
X BY WT
<
0.190
13.500
14.900
0.055
15.200
0.340
0.030
5.000
0.800
0.527
0.100
0.002
0.015
0.008
0.114
0.002
0.014
0.018
0.007
0.028
0.022
0.003
0.022
0.005
<
<
0.006
<
<
0.003
<
<
0.001
0.001
0.004
<
0.072
0.030
NA
28.200
2.680
17.411
0.690
100.000
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 5.900
+ - 1.700
+ - 0.006
+ - 1.700
+ - 0.040
* - 0.030
+ - 3.800
+ - 0.160
+ 0.470
+ - 0.140
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.095
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.001
+ 0.018
+ - 0.014
+ NR
i- - 0.008
+ 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ - 0.026
t- - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - 5.000
+ - 0.320
+ - 9.300
+ - 0.130
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
0.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
15.454
NA
NA
15.926
0.398
0.042
3.908
0.834
0.358
0.414
0.015
0.073
0.004
0.812
NA
0.288
0.078
0.006
0.050
0.018
0.002
0.016
0.004
0.003
<
0.012
<
<
0.002
<
<
0.001
0.002
0.004
<
0.053
NA
NA
22.180
15.247
12.764
0.593
89.561
29102
3324
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.387
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 1.657
+ 0.047
+ 0.019
+ - 2.065
+ - 0.338
+ - 0.254
+ 0.083
+ - 0.002
+ 0.013
+ - 0.006
* - 0.281
+ - NR
+ - 0.078
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.008
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.005
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ 0.014
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.032
+ 2.765
* - 5.043
+ - 0.086
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 49. FINE FRACTION CORRECTED BY 8% TO NORMALIZE TO 100%
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER INUMBER jGROUP
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
29101
46,54 (ALUMINUM |J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
(PROCESS- (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
ING |FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
|IN PORTLAND.OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTERC1979)
| AND
(JITENDRA j. SHAH,"MEASUREMENTS OF
(CARBONACEOUS AEROSOLS ACROSS THE US:SOURCES
[AND ROLE IN VISIBILITY DEGREOATIOK," PHD
(THESIS, OREGON GRADUATE CENTER. 1981.
(TABLE A.2.
I
(ALUMINUM REDUCTION EMISSIONS VENTED THROUGH
(STACK DOWNSTREAM OF BAGHOUSE. AVERAGE OF 3
(SAMPLES TAKEN AT TWO PLANTS.
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
((2.0 UM 050) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
|UM, D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATIONCCORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
HG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY COPPER SMELTER
3-03-005-03
ESP
FINE
********* <2.5 UM
X BY WT + -
0.007 -K
< + -
4.950 + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< +
< + -
0.792 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.007 + -
< + -
< +
< +
0.056 + -
0.660 + -
0.047 + -
< + -
< + -
92.449 + -
0.640 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< 4- -
< -I- -
0.010 + -
< + -
0.217 + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.049 +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
99.884
PROFILE: 29202
RANKING: 2121
RATING : D
COARSE TSP
****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM ******
UNC X BY WT +- UNC X BY WT + UNC
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR +
NR +
NR + -
NR *
NR +
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR +
NR +
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR *
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
0.000
+ .
+ -
₯
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
( -
»
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
f -
+ .
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+
+ .
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 24
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29102
29102
29102
29102
29102
29102
49 (ALUMINUM |J.A. COOPER, C.FRAZIER AND J.E. HOUCH, (AVERAGE OF TWO REPLICATE SAMPLES FROM ROOF
(REDUCTIONISEATTLE-TACOMA AEROSOL CHARACTERIZATION |VENTS ABOVE ALUMINUM REDUCTION POTLINES.
(POTLINE (STUDY" DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO THE PUGET (THERE WERE NO CONTROLS. SAMPLES WERE
| (SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NEA,INC. (COLLECTED WITH A TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
| |1983. |
I I I
-------
Receptor Model Source Composition Library
Air Management Technology Branch
Monitoring and Data Analysis Division (MD-14)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
I would like to receive future revisions to the
Receptor Model Source Composition Library.
Name
Address
5 _ ZIP.
M
Telephone (Optional)
-------
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
29202
29202
29202
29202
29202
29202
24 [COPPER |K. SCHUITZGEBEL, R. COLEMAN, R. COLLINS, R. (PROFILE OF EMISSIONS DOWNSTREAM OF AN ESP
(SMELTER (MANN AND C. THOMPSON,"TRACE ELEMENT STUDY AT (CONTROLLING REVERB FURNACE EMISSIONS ON A
| (A PRIMARY COPPER SMELTER," US EPA # |200 TON/DAY 25 YEAR OLD SMELTER . SAMPLES
| (600/2-78-065A (1978). [OBTAINED ISOKINETICALLY WITH SPECIAL TRAIN.
| | (ANALYZED BY XRF/SSMS. 1-2 SAMPLES.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
46
48
49
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< X )
NOTES:
SOURCE: COPPER OXIDE
SCC: 3-04-999-99
CONTROLS: WET SCRUBBER
I
SPECIES ********* <;
NAME X BY UT
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
Tl
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
PD
CD
IN
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
0.000
OC * ORGANIC CARBON :
KILN PROFILE: 2920
RANKING: 332
RATING :
FINE COARSE TSP
2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM
+ UNC % BY WT +- UNC % BY WT +
« + - NA + -
+ - + NA + -
+ - + - NA + -
+ + NA + -
* + - NA + -
+ - + - 0.347 + -
+ - + - 0.362 +
+ - + - 0.193 +
+ - + - 4.488 + -
+ - + 2.116 + -
+ + - 0.211 + -
* - + - 0.750 + -
* - + - < +
+ + - 0.018 + -
+ + - < -t- -
+ - + - 0.014 + -
+ - + < + -
+ - + - 0.100 + -
+ + < + -
+ + - 0.203 + -
+ * - 54.151 + -
+ + 0.127 + -
+ - + < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ + - 0.018 + -
( - + - < + -
+ + - 0.011 + -
* + - 0.011 + -
+ - + - 0.088 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < +
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ + - 0.013 + -
+ - + - < ( .
+ + - < + -
* + - 0.234 +
+ - + - NA + -
+ - + NA + -
+ + - NA + -
+ - + NA + -
0.000 63.455
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
3
1
C
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.035
0.036
0.019
0.449
0.212
0.021
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
NR
0.020
5.415
0.039
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.016
NR
0.018
NR
NR
0.083
NR
NR
0.023
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : PRODUCTION OF COPPER OXIDE FROM METALLIC COPPER AND COPPER OXIDE MIXTURES
WET SCRUBBER. REF. 44.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
29203 |
29203 |
29203 |
29203 |
29203 |
29203 |
29203 I
43 | COPPER
| OXIDE
(KILN
I
I
I
I
|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
[APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I
I
I
I
[STACK EMISSIONS FOR A COPPER OXIDE KILN.
[COPPER OXIDE PRODUCED FROM METALLIC COPPER
(AND COPPER OXIDE MIXTURES. WET SCRUBBER
[ABATEMENT SYSTEM. SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM
[PLUME LEVEL WITH TOP OF STACK, WITH A
| HIGH -VOLUME SAMPLING SYSTEM.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
47
48
49
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE: PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING - SLAG POURING
SCC: 3-03-010-21
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC % BY WT + UNC
BE + - +
B + - + -
F + - + -
NA + - + -
MG + - + -
AL * - + -
SI + - + -
P + - +
S + - + -
CL + - +
K + + -
CA + - +
SC + - +
TI -f + -
V + - + -
CR * - + -
MN + - +
FE + - + -
CO + + -
HI + - + -
CU + +
ZN + - + -
GA + - +
GE + + -
AS + + -
SE + - + -
BR + - + -
RB + + -
SR + - + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
IN + + -
SN + - + -
SB + - + -
CS + - + -
BA + - + -
CE + - + -
HG + - + -
PB + - + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - + -
N03 + - +
0.000 0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 2930
RANKING: 332
RATING :
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY WT +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
0.420 + -
1.900 * -
0.266 + -
5.523 + -
0.090 + -
4.174 + -
2.600 + -
< + -
0.104 + -
< + -
0.020 + -
0.100 + -
3.735 + -
< + -
0.066 + -
0.375 +
32.477 +
< + -
< +
5.196 + -
0.208 + -
< + -
< + -
0.052 + -
0.130 + -
0.159 * -
0.011 +
3.849 + -
1.626 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.092 +
3.156 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
66.329
NR = NOT REPORTED
1
1
C
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.500
0.027
0.552
0.020
0.417
0.400
NR
0.010
NR
NR
0.030
0.373
N3
<
0.037
3.248
<
<
0.520
0.121
<
<
<
0.019
0.024
<
0.385
0.163
NR
0.102
0.011
0.316
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : MOLTEN SLAG POURING FUGITIVES. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE (REFERENCE [SOURCE
NUMBER | NUMBER | GROUP
29301
29301
29301
29301
29301
29301
29301
43 | SLAG
| POUR ING
I
I
I
I
I
| REFERENCE
I
|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
| APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
|THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I
I
I
I
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
(FUGITIVE EMISSIONS FROM PRIMARY LEAD
(SMELTING SLAG POURING. SLAG WAS DEZINCEO BY
(FUMING BEFORE PORRING. SAMPLE COLLECTED
(WITH MODIFIED HIGH VOLUME SAMPLE. SAMPLE IS
| COMPOSITE OF SHORT EPISODIC EMISSIONS FROM
(MANY POURS.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SB
SN
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD
3-03-010-02
BAGHOUSE
SMELT ING- BLAST
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY UT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.100
0.200
0.764
13.269
5.000
2.075
0.550
0.027
<
0.020
<
0.131
0.060
0.354
15.217
3.047
0.037
0.130
<
0.201
0.166
23.503
0.015
0.501
0.137
0.178
0.022
30.867
NA
NA
NA
NA
96.571
OC * ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ 0.200
+ - 0.076
+ 1.446
+ - 0.800
+ - 0.207
+ 0.055
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.013
+ - NR
+ - 0.035
+ 1.522
+ - 0.305
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ 0.020
+ - 0.017
+ - 2.350
+ - NR
+ 0.050
+ - 0.065
+ 0.066
+ - 0.013
+ - 3.087
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
FURNAHCE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.100
0.200
0.730
13.189
4.700
2.179
0.540
0.038
<
0.031
<
0.163
0.055
0.355
14.917
3.347
0.018
0.120
<
0.025
0.146
21.308
0.050
0.482
0.059
0.216
0.025
29.683
NA
NA
NA
NA
92.676
CARBON : NA
PROFILE: 29302
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.100
+ - 0.200
+ 0.073
+ 1.607
+ - 0.500
+ 0.218
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.021
+ - NR
+ - 0.035
+ - 1.492
* - 0.335
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.011
+ 0.024
+ - 0.040
+ - 2.131
+ NR
+ - 0.081
+ - 0.151
+ - 0.308
+ - 0.020
+ - 2.968
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED : NR =
TSP
********* <3o UM
X BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
0.100 + -
0.200 + -
0.758 +
13.255 +
4.949 + -
2.093 + -
0.548 + -
0.029 + -
< + -
0.022 + -
< + -
0.136 + -
0.059 +
0.354 +
15.166 + -
3.098 + -
0.034 + -
0.128 * -
< + -
0.171 + -
0.163 * -
23.130 + -
0.021 + -
0.498 +
0.124 + -
0.184 + -
0.022 * -
30.666 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
95.908
* NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.071
0.141
0.076
1.325
0.495
0.209
0.055
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.014
NR
0.035
1.517
0.310
NR
0.018
NR
0.017
0.021
2.313
NR
0.050
0.082
0.157
0.012
3.067
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : BLAST FURNACE BAGHOUSE EMISSIONS
COARSE FRACTION 2.5-7 UM, D50. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF1LE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER ]GROUP
REFERENCE
|REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
29302
29302
29302
29302
29302
43 ILEAD |J.E.HOUCH.ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTING (APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
|- BLAST [THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1932)
| FURNACE |
[PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING BLAST FURNACE STACK. |
IBAGHOUSE CONTROL SYSTEM. SAMPLES COLLECTED |
[WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER. |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AC
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-ZINC FUMING
3-03-010-08
BAGHOUSE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT » UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.500
1.500
0.164
2.567
1.700
0.550
0.200
0.026
<
0.011
<
0.164
0.098
0.207
53.517
1.424
0.011
<
<
0.128
0.048
0.084
0.056
0.703
0.545
<
0.064
7.459
NA
NA
NA
NA
71.726
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.300
+ 0.016
+ - 0.334
+ - Q.400
+ 0.055
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.016
+ - NR
+ - 0.021
+ - 5.352
+ 0.142
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.013
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.054
+ - 0.039
+ NR
+ - 0.746
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-1QUM ******
X BY UT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
0.300 + -
0.700 +
0.182 + -
3.544 + -
0.300 + -
0.613 +
0.300 + -
0.033 +
< +
0.014 + -
< + -
0.386 + -
0.104 +
0.273 + -
59.174 + -
1.525 +
0.012 + -
< + -
< + -
0.063 + -
0.039 + -
0.062 + -
0.030 + -
0.706 + -
0.587 +
< + -
0.061 + -
9.645 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
78.653
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.200
0.018
0.449
0.100
0.061
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.039
0.010
0.027
5.917
0.152
NR
NR
NR
0.011
0.012
0.019
NR
0.071
0.061
0.100
NR
0.964
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 29303
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <30 UN
X BY UT +-
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA * -
NA »
0.450 + -
1.300 +
0.168 + -
2.811 + -
1.350 + -
0.566 + -
0.225 + -
0.028 +
< + -
0.012 +
< +
0.219 + -
0.099 +
0.223 + -
54.931 + -
1.449 +
0.011 + -
< + -
< + -
0.112 + -
0.046 + -
0.078 + -
0.049 +
0.704 + -
0.555 + -
< + -
0.063 + -
8.005 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
73.454
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.071
0.180
0.017
0.281
0.206
0.057
0.071
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.022
NR
0.022
5.493
0.145
NR
NR
NR
0.011
NR
0.011
NR
0.070
0.055
0.054
NR
0.800
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : ZINC OXIDE FUMING STACK.COARSE FRACTION 2.5-7 UM. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29303 |
29303 |
29303 |
29303 |
29303 |
29303 |
29303 I
43 JZINC
IOXIDE
(FUMING
I
I
I
I
|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I
I
I
I
(ZINC OXIDE FUMING STACK. LEAD SMELTING SLAG
(FUMED FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ZINC OXIDE.
(PULVERIZED COAL FUEL. BAGHOUSE ABATEMENT
(SYSTEM. SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH DILUTION
(SAMPLER.
I
I
-------
13-Jutv85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
Sl)M( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
s
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE -
HG
PB
OC
EC
504
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELT1NG-SINTERING
3-03-010-01
BAGHOUSE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.900
3.000
0.798
15.829
1.000
0.889
2.600
<
0.169
0.000
0.046
0.380
5.764
<
0.082
1.498
4.174
<
<
4.948
0.129
0.080
<
0.198
<
0.246
1.358
0.234
1.907
<
0.115
<
0.172
26.610
NA
NA
NA
NA
73.126
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.090
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.080
+ - 1.583
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.089
+ - 0.260
+ - NR
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.000
+ 0.005
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.576
+ - NR
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.417
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.495
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.034
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.049
+ - 0.191
+ - NR
+ - 0.205
+ - NR
+ - 0.022
+ - 2.661
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.000
3.500
0.767
15.097
0.900
0.741
5.000
<
0.203
0.000
0.065
0.500
7.761
<
0.093
2.060
5.678
<
<
2.900
0.085
0.060
<
0.262
<
0.234
1.158
0.128
1.603
<
0.375
<
0.142
26.900
NA
NA
NA
NA
77.212
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.300
+ - 1.000
+ - 0.120
+ - 2.390
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.112
+ 1.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.000
* - 0.013
+ - 0.100
+ - 1.085
+ - NR
+ - 0.017
+ 0.289
+ - 0.793
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.429
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.000
+ NR
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.192
+ - 0.106
+ - 0.312
+ NR
+ 0.491
+ - NR
+ - 0.033
+ - 3.750
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
29304
3321
B
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29304
29304
29304
29304
29304
29304
29304
43 (LEAD |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,»EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTER (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
I I
(SINTERING STACK FROM A PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING
(STACK. WEAK S02 GAS ONLY IS VENTED THROUGH
(THIS STACK. THE STRONG GAS STREAM IS
(UTILIZED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SULFURIC
(ACID. BAGHOUSE ABATEMENT SYSTEMS. SAMPLE
(COLLECTED WITH A DILUTION SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELT ING-BLAST
3-03-010-02
BAGHOUSE
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
0.030
0.959
19.400
3.880
2.321
0.500
0.033
<
0.017
<
0.124
0.063
0.184
7.420
3.349
0.072
0.110
0.035
0.308
0.152
16.240
0.030
0.585
0.297
0.144
0.117
43.630
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.000
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.096
+ - 2.077
+ 1.000
+ - 0.232
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.012
+ - NR
+ 0.018
+ - 0.754
+ - 0.335
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.015
+ - 1.647
* NR
+ - 0.058
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.018
+ - 4.395
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
FURNANCE UPSET
PROFILE: 29305
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
0.220 +
0.500 * -
0.642 +
11.885 + -
2.000 + -
1.466 + -
0.500 * -
0.050 + -
< + -
0.020 + -
< + -
0.942 + -
0.057 + -
0.414 + -
14.918 + -
1.541 + -
0.023 +
0.032 + -
0.037 + -
0.063 + -
0.079 + -
7.872 +
0.030 + -
0.289 + -
0.217 + -
< + -
0.069 +
29.507 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA »>
NA + -
73.373
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.050
0.200
0.064
1.463
0.500
0.147
0.073
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.094
NR
0.041
1.492
0.162
NR
NR
NR
0.021
0.029
0.787
NR
0.058
0.108
0.230
0.020
2.951
NR
NR
NR
NR
TSP
********* <3o UK
X BY WT +-
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
< + -
0.030 + -
0.688 + -
14.058 + -
4.000 + -
1.510 + -
0.500 + -
0.060 + -
< +
0.023 + -
< + -
1.624 +
0.067 + -
0.677 + -
6.184 + -
2.855 + -
0.074 + -
0.110 + -
0.062 + -
0.144 + -
0.117 + -
10.202 + -
0.030 + -
0.363 + -
0.399 + -
0.213 + -
0.035 + -
42.687 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
86.712
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.069
1.901
1.000
0.151
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.162
NR
0.068
0.618
0.285
0.011
0.030
NR
0.014
0.012
1.020
NR
0.036
0.056
0.056
0.018
4.269
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 43. FINE FRACTION CORRECTED BY 1% TO NORMALIZE TO 100%
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE[SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
[REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29305
29305
29305
29305
43 (PRIMARY [J.E.HOUCH.ET.AL.."EAST HELENA SOURCE
[LEAD [APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
[SMELTING (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
[BLAST FURNACE UPSET SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH A
(DILUTION SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
40
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
ZR
AG
CD
PO
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-ZINC BAGHOUSE
3-03-010-08
BAGHOUSE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.050
0.779
0.311
6.254
<
0.949
0.500
0.042
<
0.016
<
0.221
0.095
0.259
50.140
2.298
0.011
0.030
<
0.034
0.032
0.080
0.030
1.066
0.717
<
0.048
12.440
NA
NA
NA
NA
76.402
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
* - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.078
+ - 0.031
+ 0.639
+ - 0.054
+ - 0.095
+ 0.300
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.022
+ - NR
+ - 0.026
+ - 5.014
+ - 0.230
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.031
+ - NR
+ - 0.107
+ 0.092
+ 0.168
+ - 0.011
+ - 1.244
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.551
5.091
0.272
4.308
0.050
0.834
1.000
0.090
<
0.014
0.050
1.150
0.098
0.498
43.478
1.457
0.011
<
0.014
0.053
0.037
0.030
<
0.702
0.413
<
0.049
12.482
NA
NA
NA
NA
73.732
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.155
+ - 0.509
+ - 0.027
+ - 0.575
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.083
+ - 0.200
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.115
* - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - 4.348
+ - 0.146
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.017
+ 0.026
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.069
f - 0.144
+ - NR
+ - 1.248
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE: 29306
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +-
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
0.600 + -
2.000 + -
0.190 +
3.041 + -
0.150 + -
0.862 +
0.500 + -
0.082 + -
< 4-
0.017 + -
0.030 + -
1.042 + -
0.115 + -
0.625 + -
53.304 + -
1.777 + -
0.020 + -
< + -
0.011 +
0.080 + -
0.033 + -
0.070 + -
0.011 +
0.861 + -
0.728 + -
< + -
0.059 + -
12.780 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
78.988
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.200
0.800
0.019
0.558
0.050
0.086
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.104
0.011
0.062
5.330
0.178
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.013
NR
0.086
0.073
0.055
NR
1.278
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :REF. 43.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCEISOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29306 |
29306 |
29306 |
29306 |
29306 |
29306 |
43 (ZINC
(FUMING
1
1
1
1
|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(APPORTIONMENT STUDY, "DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC. (1982)
I
I
I
(ZINC FUMING BAGHOUSE. SAMPLES COLLECTED
[WITHIN THE BAGHOUSE WITH DICHOTOMOUS AND
(LOW-VOLUME SAMPLERS. THE BAGHOUSE IS THE
(CONTROL SYSTEM FOR THE FUMING OF SLAG FROM A
(LEAD BLAST FURNACE.
I
-------
13-Jun-a5
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING-DROSS REVERB. FURNACE
3-03-010-03
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.030
0.200
0.125
1.667
<
0.108
0.600
0.060
<
<
0.013
0.106
0.054
0.140
2.361
57.818
0.115
<
<
2.389
0.854
1.164
0.023
0.191
5.200
0.078
0.269
5.561
NA
NA
NA
NA
79.126
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.244
+ - 0.017
+ 0.011
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.011
+ - MR
+ - 0.014
+ 0.236
+ - 5.782
+ - 0.011
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.239
* - 0.085
+ - 0.116
* - NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 1.000
+ - 0.022
+ - 0.027
+ - 0.556
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT -i- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
0.500 +
1.460 + -
0.141 + -
1.534 + -
< + -
0.279 +
1.160 + -
0.056 + -
< + -
0.013 + -
0.039 + -
0.752 + -
0.076 +
1.873 + -
0.963 + -
20.000 +
0.084 + -
< + -
0.014 + -
0.504 + -
0.300 + -
0.800 + -
0.191 + -
1.600 + -
2.000 + -
0.032 + -
0.107 + -
16.000 +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
50.478
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.146
0.014
0.533
0.034
0.028
0.116
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.075
NR
0.187
0.096
2.000
NR
NR
NR
0.050
0.030
0.200
0.019
0.300
0.300
0.023
0.011
4.000
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 29307
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
0.030 + -
0.200 + -
0.035 + -
< + -
< +
< »
0.763 + -
0.016 +
< » -
0.016 + -
0.024 * -
0.744 + -
0.086 + -
2.894 + -
1.358 +
24.000 + -
0.093 + -
< + -
0.011 + -
1.090 + -
0.494 + -
1.219 + -
0.231 +
1.242 +
2.700 + -
0.125 + -
0.104 + -
13.482 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
50.957
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
NR
0.582
0.038
NR
0.076
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.074
NR
0.289
0.136
3.000
NR
NR
NR
0.109
0.049
0.122
0.023
0.124
0.400
0.014
0.010
1.348
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING CROSSING AND REVERBATORY FURNACE PROCESS
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS.REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29307 |
29307 (
29307 |
29307 |
29307 |
29307 I
43 (LEAD |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTING (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
| (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
(PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING DROSSING AND
(REVERBERATORY FURNACE BUILDING PROCESS
(FUGITIVE EMISSIONS. SAMPLES COLLECTED NEAR
(BUILDING VENTS WITH DICHOTOMOUS AND
|LOU-VOLUME SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-a5
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM{ X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
CE
HG
PS
OC
EC
S04
N03
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING - SINTER PRODUCTION
3-05-010-25
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.050
0.900
0.300
1.400
2.000
0.020
0.050
<
<
<
0.016
0.015
0.160
<
0.056
0.221
0.867
<
<
8.692
0.155
0.100
<
0.030
2.702
0.699
8.859
<
2.541
2.380
0.522
<
0.129
46.503
NA
NA
NA
NA
79.367
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
* - NR
4- - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.200
+ 0.030
+ - 2.000
4- - 1.000
+ - 0.020
4- - 0.020
+ - NR
4 NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
4- - 0.020
+ - NR
4 - NR
+ - 0.022
+ 0.087
4- - NR
4 - NR
+ - 0.869
4- - 0.015
4- - 0.050
4- NR
4- NR
* 0.270
4 - 0.070
4- - 0.886
4 - NR
4 - 0.254
* - 0.238
4 - 0.052
4 - NR
4- - 0.018
+ - 4.650
4 - NR
4- - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
0.650 * -
2.900 4 -
0.360 4 -
6.000 + -
1.000 + -
0.240 + -
2.000 + -
< 4-
0.040 + -
< 4- -
0.038 + -
0.300 + -
4.800 + -
< + -
0.083 4- -
1.659 + -
4.243 +
< 4- -
< 4
5.532 4 -
0.084 4 -
0.100 + -
< + -
0.184 + -
0.746 + -
0.378 + -
2.884 4 -
< 4 -
0.680 + -
1.833 + -
0.257 + -
< 4 -
0.187 + -
27.915 4 -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
65.093
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.065
0.400
0.040
2.000
0.300
0.024
0.200
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.500
NR
NR
0.166
0.424
NR
NR
0.553
NR
0.050
NR
0.018
0.075
0.038
0.288
NR
0.068
0.183
0.026
NR
0.019
2.791
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 29309
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3o UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
0.050 + -
0.460 + -
0.120 + -
1.000 4- -
0.500 + -
0.050 + -
0.500 4 -
< 4- -
< 4 -
< + -
0.017 + -
0.120 + -
2.344 + -
< 4 -
0.061 + -
1.007 4 -
2.688 4- -
< + -
< 4- -
4.921 + -
0.101 + -
0.100 + -
< 4- -
0.097 4 -
0.730 + -
0.347 + -
3.705 4 -
< 4- -
0.776 + -
1.725 + -
0.275 + -
< + -
0.119 4 -
31.410 4- -
NA + -
NA + -
NA 4 -
NA 4 -
53.223
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.050
0.100
0.040
1.000
0.500
0.050
0.100
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.012
0.234
NR
NR
0.101
0.269
NR
NR
0.492
0.010
0.050
NR
NR
0.073
0.035
0.370
NR
0.078
0.172
0.027
NR
0.013
3.141
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : SINTER PROCESS FUGITIVES.REF.43.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
(REFERENCE ABSTRACT
29309
29309
29309
29309
29309
43 (LEAD |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
(SMELTING (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
|SIMTERING|THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
(PRIMARY LEAD SMELTING SINTERING BUILDING
(PROCESS FUGITIVE EMISSIONS. SAMPLES
(COLLECTED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON THE PILE.
(BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
-------
C. Transportation Sources
Transportation sources (30000 series) such as gasoline and diesel fueled
vehicles, jet aircraft and composite profiles are included in this
section. Composite transportation profiles describe the chemical
composition of a mixture of gasoline and diesel vehicles within a specific
airshed at a specific point in time. They are typically calculated by
weighting the emission profiles for leaded, unleaded, diesel and tirewear
in accordance with the airshed emission inventory. They may also be based
on chemical analysis of aerosol sample taken in tunnels or near heavily
travelled roadways. Refer to the profile abstracts for information
related to each specific data set.
III--C
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( %
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
)
LIGHT DUTY
NONE
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
0
NR
NR
5
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
8
NR
NR
m
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21
50
NA
0
NA
as
VEHICLES -LEADED
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
4- - UNC
4- - NA
+ - NA
4- - NA
+ NA
+ - NA
4- NR
4- NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
+ - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4- - NR
4^ - NR
4- - NR
+ NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0
0
NR
NR
5
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
8
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21
50
NA
0
NA
85
PROFILE: 31101
RANKING: 1334
RATING : C
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM ******
4- UNC % BY WT + UNC
4. NA +
+ - NA + -
+ - NA *
4- - NA + -
+ - NA + -
4- - NR + -
4- - NR 4- -
* - NR +
4- - NR 4- -
4- - NR + -
+ - NR 4- -
4- - NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
4- NR + -
4- - NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
4- - NR 4- -
4- - NR + -
4- - NR 4. -
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR 4- -
4- - NR + -
4- - NR 4- -
4- - NR + -
4- NR + -
4. - NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
4- - NR + -
4- - NR + -
4- - NR + -
+ - NR 4- -
4- NR + -
+ - NR + -
4- - NR 4- -
4- - NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
4- - NR + "
4- - NR +
4- NR 4- -
4- NR 4- -
+ - NR 4- -
0
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT NA.'NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : PROFILE IS DERIVED FROM DATA OBTAINED FROM 3 EARLIER STUDIES
FINE AND COARSE FRACTION COMPOSITION ASSUMED SIMILAR. REF 22
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF I LE | REFERENCE | SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
31101 |
31101 (
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
31101 |
22 (LEADED
(GASOLINE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
|
| REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I I
(GLEN R. CASS AND GREGORY (CASS PROFILE NO 54 DEVELOPED FROM DATA
| MCRAE , "SOURCE - RECEPTOR
(SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN
(DATA-DRAFT". PREPARED
(RESOURCE BOARD (1981).
1
1
1
1
|
RECONCILLIATION OF (OBTAINED FROM EARLIER STUDIES BY
PARTICULATE AIR QUALITY|HUNTZICKER(1981), HABIB1(1973) AND
FOR CALIFORNIA AIR (WATSON (1979). ASSUMES 2 G PB /GAL OF FUEL
(AND THAT ONLY 30% OF THE FUEL LEAD IS
(EMITTED AS PARTICLES <9UM . TRACE ELEMENT
(DATA OTHER THAN PB IS OF POOR QUALITY. S04
(BASED ON 0.05 %S IN FUEL AND S04 EMISSION
(FACTOR ESTIMATES.
(
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % 3
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
i
HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES -LEADED
NONE
NONE
FINE COARSE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC % BY WT + UNC
+ - + -
f - + -
+ - + -
+ +
+ - + -
+ - +
+ + -
+ - + -
+ - +
+ - +
+ - + -
+ - +
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ - «
+ - +
+ - +. .
+ »
+ . +, .
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ + -
+ + -
+ - + -
+ + -
+ + -
+ - + -
+ - + -
* - + -
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ - +
+ - + -
+ - + -
+ + -
* - +
+ - + -
+ + -
+ + -
+ - +
+ - + -
0 0
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.140
<
0.070
<
3.500
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
0.030
3.100
<
<
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
13.840
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
30.350
NA
NA
NA
NA
51.270
31102
2234
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NA
* - NA
* - NA
+ - NA
+ NA
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
« NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC * ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : ABOUT 4.85X EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC . VALUES BASED ON 4 TESTS OF TWO TRUCKS.
REF. 25
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE[SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
31102
31102
31102
31102
31102
31102
31102
31102
31102
25 [LEADED [H.E. DIETZMNANN.M.A.PARNESS AND R.L.
[GASOLINE |BRADOU,"EMISSIONS FROM GASOLINE AND DIESEL
(TRUCKS)(DELIVERY TRUCKS BY CHASSIS TRANSIENT CYCLE,1
IASME 81-OGP-6(1931)
IMEAM VALUES OF TESTS FROM TWO HEAVY DUTY
{LEADED GASOLINE TRUCKS (1.64 G PB/GAL)
[TESTED ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER WITH
IDILUTION TUNNEL. 370 & 345 CID ENGINES.
[TOTAL OF 4 SAMPLES DURING HOT AND COLD
[CYCLES ANALYZED BY XRF .ORGANIC EXTRACTION.
[NO UPPER CUT POINT SPECIFIED.ORIGIONAL DATA
| IN MG/KM.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES - UNLEADED
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.510
NR
NR
NR
0.044
0.170
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.015
0.110
NR
0.015
0.024
0.080
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21.100
17.800
50.000
NR
89.988
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
f - NR
* - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.510
NR
NR
NR
0.044
0.170
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.015
0.110
NR
0.015
0.024
0.080
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
21.100
17.800
50.000
NR
89.988
PROFILE: 31201
RANKING: 2224
RATING : C
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3(j UM ******
+ UNC % BY WT + UNC
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR * -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
« - NR + -
+ - NR +
* - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : DATA AERIVED FROM COMPOSITE OF 3 EARLIER STUDIES. ELEMENT DATA FROM REF 8.
FINE AND COARSE COMPOSITIION ASSUMED SIMILAR, REF. 22 & 56.
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROnLE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE
NUMBER | NUMBER | GROUP |
| REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
31201 | 22 (UNLEADED [GLEN R. CASS AND GREGORY |CASS PROFILE NO. 53. SULFATE DATA DEVELOPED
31201 | |AUTO | MCRAE, "SOURCE -RECEPTOR RECONCILLIATION OF (FROM LARESGOTI AND SPRINGER (1977); CARBON
31201 | | [SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN PARTICULATE AIR QUALITY|FROM MULH8AIER AND WILLIAMS (1981); TRACE
31201 | | IDATA-DRAFT". PREPARED FOR CALIFORNIA AIR (METALS FROM WATSON (1979).
31201 | | (RESOURCE BOARD (1981). |
31201 | . | | |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
TC
OC
EC
S04
N03
LIGHT DUTY
NONE
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.110
<
0.032
0.700
<
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
0.250
0.330
<
<
<
0.067
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.420
73.000
21.900
51.100
2.100
NA
77.129
VEHICLES-DIESEL
FINE
<2.5 UM
4. .
+ -
+ -
f -
* -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
5.700
NR
NR
NR
NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.110
<
0.032
0.700
<
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
0.250
0.330
<
<
<
0.067
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.420
73.000
21.900
51.000
2.100
NA
77.129
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
5.700
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.110
<
0.032
0.700
<
<
0.120
<
<
<
<
0.250
0.330
<
<
<
0.067
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.420
73.000
21.900
51.000
2.100
NA
77.129
32101
2332
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 5.700
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : NO. 2 DIESEL FUEL URBAN DRIVING CYCLE. 70% OF TC ASSUMED TO BE EC. REF. 20.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
32101
32101
32101
32101
32101
32101
32101
20 (DIESEL |US EPA "ENGINE-RELATED PARTICIPATE
|BASED ON LIGHT DUTY, 4-STROKE ENGINE BURNING
ILIGHT IMATTER-A COMPILATION OF 180 REFERENCES" |NO. 2 DIESEL FUEL OF .081% SULFUR CONTENT.
IDUTY IUNPUBLISHED. PROVIDED BY F. BLACK,USEPA,ESRL. (SOLUBLE ORGANICS ESTIMATED AT u.s+-9.o% OF
| (U.S. EPA, ESRL. RTP, NC.O981). JWH1CH 83.7% IS CARBON,12% HYDROGEN AND .71%
| [TABLES 2-35 THRU 2-42. (NITROGEN.BAP 9.8E-4 +- 9.7E-4 %. VOLKSWAGEN
| | ]RABBIT DIESEL.
I I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
NG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
HEAVY DUTY DIESEL
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA
0.130
<
0.800
0.900
1.000
1.600
0.150
2.700
<
0.170
0.700
<
0.014
<
0.002
0.039
0.600
<
0.003
0.025
0.160
<
<
<
<
<0.05
<
0.014
0.004
<
<
<
<
<
0.077
<
<
1.300
20.900
54.800
4.900
NA
88.288
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.200
+ 0.200
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.030
+ - 0.200
+ NR
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ 0.001
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.100
+ NR
* 0.001
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.300
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.900
« - NR
*********
% BY UT
NA
0.130
<
o.soo
0.900
1.000
1.600
0.150
2.700
<
0.170
0.700
<
0.014
<
0.002
0.039
0.600
<
0.003
0.025
0.160
<
<
<
<
<0.05
<
0.014
0.004
<
<
<
<
<
0.077
<
<
1.300
20.900
54.800
4.900
NA
88.288
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.200
+ NR
+ - 0.004
+ - NR
+ 0.001
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.100
+ NR
+ - 0.001
+ 0.010
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.001
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ NR
* - 0.300
« - 0.140
+ NR
+ - 0.900
+ - NR
PROFILE: 32202
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER {NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
32202
41,56 (DIESEL
(HEAVY
| DUTY
|W. R. PIERSON AND U. W. (DIESEL TRUCK PROFILE OBTAINED BY REGRESSION
|BRACHACZEK,"PARTICULATE MARK ASSOCIATED WITH (ANALYSIS OF TUSCARORA TUNNEL DATA, 1977.
(VEHICLES ON THE ROAD II, " AEROSOL SCIENCE
(AND TECHNOLOGY 2:1-40 (1983). TABLE 2.
| AND |
|A.C. SCKARLAT AND S. JAPAR,"OPTICAL AND |
(CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF PARTICLE EMISSIONS |
(FROM ON-ROAD VEHICLES," JOURNAL AIR POLLUTION)
(CONTROL ASSOC. 33:6 (1983). |
(SEE PROFILE 33001. ALL 3 SIZE FRACTIONS
(ASSUMED OF SIMILAR COMPOSITION.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
TC
EC
S04
N03
LEADED/UNLEADED GASOLINE COMPOSITE -1977
NONE
: NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
0.059
<
0.169
1.099
0.254
0.845
0.110
0.761
1.352
0.254
2.113
<
0.008
<
0.001
0.135
0.507
<
<0.006
0.059
0.068
<
<
<
<
9.464
<
0.010
<
0.002
t.
<
<
<
0.059
<
<
20.280
56.615
<
5.915
NA
100
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - 0.110
+ NR
+ - 0.700
+ - 0.600
+ - 0.900
+ 1.300
+ - 0.110
+ - NR
+ - 0.800
+ - 0.200
+ 0.700
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.030
* - 0.080
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.900
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ - NR
+ 0.009
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 42.00
+ NR
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
0.059
<
0.169
1.099
0.254
0.845
0.110
0.761
1.352
0.254
2.113
<
0.008
<
0.001
0.135
0.507
<
<0.006
0.059
0.068
<
<
<
<
9.464
<
0.010
<
0.002
<
<
<
<
0.059
<
<
20.280
56.615
<
5.915
NA
100
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - 0.110
+ - NR
+ - 0.700
+ 0.600
+ - 0.900
+ - 1.300
+ - 0.110
+ NR
+ - 0.800
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.700
+ NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
f - 0.006
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.900
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ - NR
+ 0.009
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 42.00
+ - NR
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
PROFILE: 33001
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
TSP
********* <3Q UN ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
0.059 + -
< + -
0.169 -f -
1.099 + -
0.254 + -
0.845 + -
0.110 +
0.761 + -
1.352 + -
0.254 « -
2.113 « -
< *
0.008 + -
< + -
0.001 + -
0.135 + -
0.507 + -
< +
<0.006 + -
0.059 + -
0.068 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
9.464 + -
< + -
0.010 + -
< * -
0.002 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.059 + -
< + -
< + -
20.280 + -
56.615 + -
< + -
5.915 + -
NA i- -
100
NR
0.110
NR
0.700
0.600
0.900
1.300
0.110
NR
0.800
0.200
0.700
NR
0.020
NR
0.006
0.025
0.600
NR
NR
0.030
0.080
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.900
NR
0.016
NR
0.009
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.020
NR
NR
NR
42.00
NR
3.000
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COMPOSITE OF 39% UNLEADED, 52% LEADED REGULAR, 9% PREMIUM LEADED. TUSCARORA, PA
TUNNEL 1977 EXPERIMENT. VALUES CORRRECTED BY 18% TO NORMALIZE TO 100% OF MASS.
REF. 41
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
33001 41 (TRANSPORT|U. R. PIERSON AND W. W. [MIXED LEADED UNLEADED TRANSPORTATION PROFILE
33001 |COMPOSITE|BRACHACZEK,"PART ICULATE MATTER ASSOCIATED (ESTIMATED BY REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF
33001 (WITH VEHICLES ON THE ROAD II, ' AEROSOL |TUSCARORA TUNNEL DATA. ASSUME A 39%
33001 (SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2:i-4o (1983). Table 2|uNLEADED AND 53% UNLEADED VEHICLE MIX.
33001 | [HYDROGEN 10+ -6%, OXYGEM 5%. BASED ON AAS,
33001 | IXRF, ICAP, INNA, ic, CARBON COMBUSTION OF
33001 | |<5.5 AND <40UM SAMPLES. ALL 3 SIZE
33001 . | (FRACTIONS ASSUMED SIMILAR BASED ON SIZE
33001 | (DISTRIBUTION.
33001 | I
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR-
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
TRANSPORTATION COMPOSITE - MED FORD, OR. < 1980) PROFILE: 33002
NONE RANKING: 1111
NOT APPLICABLE RATING : C
*********
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
0.083
0.860
0.140
0.590
NA
3.920
2.350
<
1.170
NA
0.320
<
<
<
1.850
NA
<
<
0.090
NA
<
<
<
5.320
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
13.800
43.120
26.120
NA
NA
95.813
OC = ORGANIC CARBON
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.012
+ 0.740
+ 0.130
+ - 0.220
+ NR
+ - 4.950
+ 0.780
+ - NR
+ 1.550
+ - NR
+ - 0.370
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.790
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.090
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 1.810
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 2.070
+ - 8.620
+ - 9.660
+ - NR
+ - NR
: EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.083
0.850
NA
0.280
NA
3.110
1.690
<
0.560
NA
NA
<
<
<
1.130
NA
<
<
0.280
NA
<
<
<
3.670
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
9.600
38.420
40.960
NA
NA
97.523
CARBON : NA =
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM ******
+- UNC X BY WT +- UNC
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
« - NR + -
+ - 0.012 + -
+ - 0.730 + -
+ - NR * -
+ - 0.110 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 3.930 + -
+ - 0.560 + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.740 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ 1.100 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.280 * -
+ - NR * -
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 1.250 + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR +
* - NR + -
+ 1.440 + -
+ - 7.680 + -
+ - 15.16 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
0.000
NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : MEDFORD AEROSOL STUDY, 1980. REF. 45.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
33002
33002
33002
33002
33002
45 ITRANSPQR-IR.T.OECESAR AND JA COOPER,»MEDFORD AEROSOL
ITATION (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| |OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| IGRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(COMPOSITE TRANSPORTATION SOURCE PROFILE FOR
|MEDFORD, OREGON, 1980. INCLUDES EMISSIONS
(FROM LEADED AND UNLEADED GASOLINE AND DIESEL
(COMBUSTION AND TIRE WEAR.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
TRANSPORTATION COMPOSITE - PORTLAND, OR. (1979)
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.100
0.820
<
0.400
3.000
0.072
1.250
<
<
<
<
<
2.100
<
0.018
0.073
0.350
<
<
<
<
5.000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
20.000
43.400
18.970
1.300
0.910
98.763
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.500
+ 0.300
+ - NR
* - 0.130
+ - 1.000
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.500
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.016
* - 0.800
+ - NR
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.030
* - 0.130
+ - NR
+ - NR
f - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.700
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR '
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 3.000
+ 6.90
+ - 6.410
+ - 0.400
+ - 0.300
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA *
1.100 +
0.820 + -
< + -
0.400 + -
3.000 +
0.072 + -
1.250 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< * -
2.100 +
< + -
0.018 + -
0.073 + -
0.350 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
5.000 + -
< +
< + -
< * -
< +
< +
< + -
< ₯
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -I- -
20.000 + -
43.400 + -
18.970 + -
1.300 + -
0.910 + -
98.763
NR
NR
0.010
0.050
0.500
0.500
0.300
NR
0.130
1.000
0.029
0.500
NR
0.100
0.005
0.010
0.016
0.800
NR
0.008
0.030
0.130
NR
NR
NR
NR
1.700
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
3.000
6.90
6.410
0.400
0.300
PROFILE: 33003
RANKING: 1221
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ .
4- -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46. ORIGIONAL OC.EC DATA UPDATED BY SHAH (REF. 54).
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFEREMCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
33003
46 [TRAMSPOR-|J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
ITATION [RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
| |FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
| |IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
I I AND
| (JITENDRA j. SHAH,"MEASUREMENTS OF
(COMPOSITE LEADED AND UNLEADED AUTOMOTIVE
(EXHAUST. BASED ON TUNNEL STUDIES AND DIRECT
(EXHAUST MEASUREMENTS.
I I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
|(2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL ACROSS THE U.S.: SOURCES]NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
(AND ROLE IN VISIBILITY DEGREDATION,"PHD
|THESIS,OREGON GRADUATE CENTER. MAY,1981.
(TABLE A.2.
|UM,D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
ICARBON OXIDATION (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC>.
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, ORGANIC CARBON IS UNDERESTIMATED.
IORIGIONAL PACS EC.OC ANALYSIS REVISED BY SHAW)
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % 3
SOURCE: JET AIRCRAFT
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE
SPECIE ********* <2.5 UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC
BE + -
B + -
F +
NA + -
MG +
AL * -
SI + -
P +
S + -
CL + -
K +
CA + -
SC + -
n +
V +
CR + -
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI + -
CU + -
ZN + -
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR + -
RB + -
SR + -
ZR + -
AG + -
CD + -
SN +
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG + -
PB + -
OC + -
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
i 0.000
*********
% BY WT
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
25.900
70.100
NR
NR
96.000
COARSE
2.5-10UM
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
t .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
PROFILE: 34001
RANKING: 2122
RATING : 0
TSP
****** ********* <3Q UM ******
UNC % BY WT +- UNC
NR -I- -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR -i- -
NR + -
NR + -
NR -i- -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR' + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR * -
NR + -
NR + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON NR: NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : ABOUT 4% LISTED AS "OTHER" COMPONENTS. REF.20
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE I REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP | |
34001 |
34001 |
34001 |
34001 |
34001 |
20 (AIRCRAFT |US EPA "ENGINE-RELATED PARTICULATE
| IMATTER-A COMPILATION OF 180 REFERENCES"
| (UNPUBLISHED. PROVIDED BY f. BLACK, USEPA.ESRL.
| |U.S. EPA, ESRL. RTP, NC.C1981).
I I
|CASS PROFILE NO. 55. OBTAINED FROM HEYUOOD,
|ET.AL.(1971)
I
I I
I
-------
13-Jun-SS
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: TIRE WEAR
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC X )
FINE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM
NAME % BY WT +
BE NR + -
B NR + -
F NR + -
NA NR + -
MG NR + -
AL < + -
SI < +
P < + -
S < + -
CL < + -
1C < « -
CA < +
SC < +
TI < + -
V < + -
CR < +
MN < + -
FE < +
CO < + -
NI < +
CD < + -
ZN 1.000 + -
GA < + -
GE < +
AS < + -
SE < + -
BR < + -
RB < + -
SR < + -
ZR f + -
AG < + -
CD < + -
SN < +
SB < + -
CS < + -
BA < +
CE < + -
KG < + -
PB < + -
OC 21.750 + -
EC 60.900 +
S04 NR + -
N03 NR +
83.650
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< * - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
1.000 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
21.750 + - NR
60.900 + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
83.650
PROFILE: 34002
RANKING: 1124
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT «- UNC
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + NR
NR + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
1.000 + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR"
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< + NR
< + - NR
< + - NR
< « NR
21.750 + - NR
60.900 + - NR
NR + - NR
NR + - NR
83.650
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COMPOSITE PROFILE DEVELOPED FROM
REFS. 41.46,53.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
WORK BY PIERSON, WATSON AND MORTON.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
34002
34002
34002
34002
34002
41,46,53|TIRE (W.R. PIERSON AND W.D. BRACHAEZEK,"
(WEAR IPARTICULATE MATTER ASSOCIATED WITH VEHICLES
| (ON THE ROAD II" AEROSOL SCIENCE AND
| (TECHNOLOGY 2:1 (1983) AND REFS. 53,46
(COMPOSITE PROFILE DEVELOPED FROM DATA BY
(MORTON MODIFIED TO INCLUDE ZN VALUES FROM
IPIERSON AND EC/OC RATIOS REPORTED BY WATSON.
-------
D. Area Sources
Series 40000 profiles include crustal, vegetative burning and
miscellaneous other area source profiles that have been used in
receptor modeling studies.
III-D
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD DUST HISSOULA, MONTANA
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
0.960
1.000
8.100
23.800
<
<
0.030
2.300
1.700
<
0.260
0.004
<
0.026
3.200
<
<
0.110
0.040
<
<
<
<
0.002
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.130
10.000
1.400
NA
NA
53.062
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.130
+ - 1.000
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ 0.500
f - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.010
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.960
1.000
6.500
28.000
<
<
0.032
2.300
1.700
<
0.260
0.004
<
0.026
3.200
<
<
0.110
0.040
<
<
<
<
0.002
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.130
10.000
1.400
NA
NA
55.664
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UH ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.130
+ - 1.000
+ - 3.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.500
+ 0.100
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.001
+ NR
+ 0.001
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
* NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
* NR
+ NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 41101
RANKING: 2211
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UN ******
% BY UT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
4- -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : RESUSPENDED PAVED ROAD DUST ANALYZED BY XRF AND CARBON CONBUSTION. REF.
28
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE[SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP | |
41101 | 28 (PAVED |j. A. COOPER, "MISSOULA MONTANA SOURCE |XRF AND CARBON OXIDATION ANALYSIS OF ROAD
41101 | IROAD DUST(APPORTIONMENT STUDY", FINAL REPORT TO THE |DUST SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VACINITY OF
41101 | | (MONTANA DEPT. OF PUBLIC HEALTH. NEA. INC. (LION'S PARK. SAMPLE RESUSPENDED THRU A
41101 | | ((1980) (DICHOTOMOUS SAMPLER.
41101 ((I |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: PAVED ROAD DUST - JUNEAU, ALASKA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** *********
NUMBER NAME X BY WT + - UNC % BY WT
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % )
BE +
B + -
F + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL + -
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL + -
K +
CA + -
SC + -
Tl + -
V +
CR +
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI »
CU + -
ZN +
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR + -
RB +
'SR + -
ZR + -
AG +
CD * -
SN + -
SB +
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG +
PB + -
OC +
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 * -
0.000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.900
32.800
0.190
0.250
0.150
1.460
3.290
<
0.810
0.050
0.030
0.130
7.190
<
0.010
0.010
0.700
<
<
<
<
0.020
<
0.050
0.010
<
<
0.080
0.030
<
0.280
<
<
0.530
NA
NA
0.750
NA
59.720
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.580
+ - 1.680
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.080
+ - 0.170
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.370
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
* - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.020
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.160
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
41102
2221
C
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.900
32.800
0.190
0.250
0.150
1.460
3.290
<
0.810
0.050
0.030
0.130
7.190
<
0.010
0.010
0.700
<
<
<
<
0.020
<
0.050
0.010
<
<
0.080
0.030
<
0.280
<
<
0.530
NA
NA
0.750
NA
59.720
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.580
+ - 1.680
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.060
+ 0.020
+ - 0.080
+ - 0.170
+ - 0.000
+ 0.040
+ - 0.000
* 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.370
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
* - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ 0.000
+ - 0.020
+ 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.160
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.180
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 19
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER [GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41102 |
41102 |
41102 |
41102 |
41102 |
41102 |
19 IPAVED |j. A. COOPER AND c. A. FRAZIER,
[ROAD DUST] "PRELIMINARY SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF WINTER
j IPARTICULATE MASS IN JUNEAU, ALASKA, "REPORT
| | TO THE ALASKA DEPT. ENVIRON. CONSERV. NEA,
| |INC. (1983).
IRESUSPENDED PAVED ROAD DUST FROM JUNEAU.
(ANALYZED BY XRF, ONLY. COMPOSITE OF 3
(SUBSAMPLES. FINE FRACTION, ONLY.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
1.300
2.200
11.600
36.000
<
0.600
0.310
1.180
2.400
<
0.630
0.020
0.030
0.120
5.700
<
0.040
0.040
0.160
<
<
<
<
0.020
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.330
NA
NA
NA
NA
62.680
DUST- LEWISTON, IDAHO
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.200
+ - 0.500
+ - 0".700
+ - 2.000
* - NR
+ - 0.100
* - 0.070
+ 0.090
+ - 0.100
+ NR
+ 0.040
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.300
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
1.600
1.600
6.900
24.000
<
0.360
0.140
1.200
2.800
<
0.860
0.030
0.030
0.130
6.600
<
0.010
0.010
0.080
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.140
NA
NA
NA
NA
46.490
COARSE
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.200
+ - 0.300
+ - 1.000
+ NR
+ - 0.020
+ NR
+ - 0.060
+ 0.100
+ - NR
+ 0.040
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.300
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.000
41103
3324
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 42
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41103
41103
41103
41103
42 |PAVED
| ROAD
| DUST
I
|J.A. COOPER,"POTLATCH CORPORATION AEROSOL |PAVED ROAD DUST FROM DOWNTOWN LEWISTON
(CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," FINAL REPORT TO THE (IDAHO RESUSPENCED AND ANALYZED BY XRF.
|POTLATCH CORPORATION BY NEA, INC. SEPT. 1979 |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
37
38
42
46
47
48
50
51
49
56
57
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
RB
SR
MO
PD
AG
CD
SN
SB
IN
BA
LA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD DUST- BUTTE, MONTANA
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.493
34.850
0.406
1.029
0.173
2.374
3.937
<
0.336
0.031
0.032
0.134
4.354
<
0.013
0.327
0.254
<
<
0.023
<
<
0.027
<
0.023
<
<
<
0.091
<
<
<
<
0.178
NA
NA
NA
NA
62.085
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.349
+ - 3.493
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.103
+ 0.022
+ - 0.237
+ - 0.394
+ NR
+ - 0.037
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.013
+ - 0.435
+ - NR
» - NR
+ 0.033
+ - 0.025
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.026
+ - 0.032
+ - 0.057
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.162
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.018
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.195
23.641
0.234
0.750
0.127
2.330
4.091
<
0.409
0.028
0.032
0.116
4.052
<
<
0.302
2.100
<
<
0.016
<
0.015
0.035
0.020
<
<
<
<
0.019
<
<
<
<
0.125
NA
NA
NA
NA
46.637
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.819
+ - 2.364
+ - 0.023
+ - 0.075
+ 0.013
+ - 0.233
+ - 0.409
* - NR
+ 0.041
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.405
+ - NR
+ - NR
* 0.030
+ 0.021
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.035
+ - NR
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE: 41104
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3(j UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4. -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : NEAR A COPPER MINING AND CONCENTRATING OPERATION. REF. 44.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE [
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP (
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41104 |
41104 |
41104 |
41104 |
44 (PAVED
| ROAD
(DUST
I
|D. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (PAVED CITY STREET NEAR COPPER MINE AND
(CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE, "STATE OF MONTANA (CONCENTRATING PLANT. BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND
IDEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) (RESUSPENDED.
I I i
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PO
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.821
26.334
0.287
2.076
0.373
1.560
5.859
0.349
0.023
<
0.140
3.885
<
0.382
1.289
0.342
0.011
0.108
0.022
<
0.024
0.226
<
0.048
0.123
0.099
0.015
2.473
NA
NA
NA
NA
54.869
DUST -EAST HELENA, MONTANA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.882
+ - 2.633
+ 0.040
+ - 0.251
* - 0.061
+ - 0.156
+ - 0.586
+ - 0.035
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.388
* NR
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.129
+ - 0.052
+ NR
+ - 0.013
+ - NR
+ - 0.027
+ - 0.043
+ - 0.068
+ - 0.069
+ - 0.079
+ - 0.147
+ 0.376
* - 0.012
+ - 0.247
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.415
25.299
0.217
1.310
0.134
1.724
6.973
0.397
0.024
0.024
0.137
4.341
0.014
0.507
0.841
0.212
<
0.029
0.035
<
0.011
0.090
<
0.034
0.082
0.076
<
1.909
NA
NA
NA
NA
51.835
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.741
+ - 2.530
+ 0.022
+ - 0.131
+ 0.017
+ - 0.172
+ - 0.697
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.434
+ NR
+ - 0.051
+ - 0.084
+ 0.021
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.016
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.074
+ - NR
+ - 0.191
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.586
19.943
0.131
0.856
0.063
1.216
5.583
0.309
0.018
0.018
0.106
3.109
0.011
0.503
0.590
0.153
<
0.023
0.026
<
<
0.040
0.023
0.028
0.055
<
<
1.507
NA
NA
NA
NA
39.897
41105
3321
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.559
+ - 1.994
+ - 0.013
+ - 0.086
* - 0.012
+ - 0.122
+ - 0.558
+ - 0.031
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.311
+ NR
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.059
+ - 0.015
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NR
+ 0.011
+ - 0.022
+ 0.052
+ - NR
+ 0.151
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA =
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : NEAR LEAD AND ZINC OXIDE PLANTS -
NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
E. HELENA, MT. REF. 43.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41105
41105
41105
41105
41105
43 [PAVED |J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
|ROAD DUST|APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
(MONTANA (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
|PAVED ROAD DUST COLLECTED NEAR A PRIMARY
(LEAD SMELTER AND ZINC AND COPPER OXIDE
(MANUFACTURING PLANTS. SAMPLES SIEVED AND
IRESUSPENDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD DUST - MED FORD, OR.
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
2.000
2.000
8.100
23.800
NA
0.400
0.040
0.920
2.500
NA
0.650
0.023
0.026
0.110
4.900
NA
0.010
0.040
0.050
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
0.130
10.000
1.400
0.240
0.100
57.039
FINE
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.300
+ - 1.300
+ - NR
+ 0.100
+ NR
+ - 0.080
+ - 1.100
+ - NR
+ - 0.110
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - 2.000
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.170
+ - 0.030
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
2.000
1.900
8.200
24.800
NA
0.320
NA
0.830
2.400
NA
0.540
0.031
0.026
0.120
4.700
NA
0.100
0.080
0.040
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
0.090
8.700
1.600
0.230
NA
56.387
PROFILE: 41106
RANKING: 3323
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
+- UNC % BY WT + UNC
+ MR + -
+ - MR + -
+ MR + -
+ - 0.300 + -
+ 0.100 +
+ - 0.500 + -
+ 1.300 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.200 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.080 + -
+ - 1.200 +
+ NR * -
+ - 0.060 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.020 +
+ 0.400 +
+ - NR +
+ - NR «
+ 0.090 + -
+ - 0.020 + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - MR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - 0.040 + -
+ 1.900 + -
+ - 0.800 + -
+ 0.120 + -
+ - NR + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-a5
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
41106
41106
41106
41106
41106
45 (PAVED (R.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MED FORD AEROSOL
(ROAD DUST | CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
[COMPOSITE ROAD DUST FROM MEDFORD, OREGON
(RESUSPENDED AND SAMPLED WITH A DICHOTOMOUS
(SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
S3
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD DUST -PORTLAND, OR.
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
1.250
1.300
8.840
22.300
<
0.370
<
1.030
2.440
<
0.640
0.023
0.045
0.123
6.000
<
0.009
0.030
0.110
<
<
<
<
0.020
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.370
11.800
1.850
0.420
NA
58.970
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.010
+ 0.340
+ - 0.270
+ - 2.710
+ - 1.100
+ - NR
+ - 0.140
f - 0.010
+ - 0.060
+ - 0.400
+ NR
+ - 0.120
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.012
+ 0.037
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.150
* - 4.300
+ - 0.910
+ - 0.310
+ - NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
0.008
1.750
1.540
6.600
28.400
<
<
<
1.030
3.000
<
1.010
0.027
0.045
0.100
5.730
<
0.004
0.030
0.110
<
<
<
<
0.008
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.370
3.340
1.550
0.074
0.020
54.746
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.091
+ - 0.140
+ - 0.700
+ - 0.790
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.058
+ - 0.220
+ - NR
+ - 0.180
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.017
+ - 0.011
+ - 0.290
+ NR
+ 0.003
+ 0.012
+ 0.037
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.009
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.150
+ 0.980
+ - 0.780
+ 0.045
+ - 0.010
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 41107
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f "
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 46. OC.EC DATA UPDATED BY SHAH (REF. 54)
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
41107
46 (PAVED |J. G.WATSON, "CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
(ROAD DUST ( RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
| (FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
(IN PORTLAND, OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTERC1979)
| AND
(JITENDRA J. SHAH, "MEASUREMENTS OF
(COMPOSITE ROAD DUST SAMPLE FROM PORTLAND,
(OREGON. RESUSPENDED AND SAMPLED WITH A
(TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
I I
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
(CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL ACROSS THE U.S.: SOURCES|(2.0 UM 050) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(AND ROLE IN VISIBILITY DEGREDATION,"PHO
(THESIS, OREGON GRADUATE CENTER. MAY, 1981.
(TABLE A. 2.
I
I
I
I
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
(UM.D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATION (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
1
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD DUST - ALABAMA
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.280
19.700
0.123
0.800
0.247
0.494
3.150
<
0.444
0.030
0.270
0.080
3.140
<
<
<
0.090
0.005
<
<
0.010
0.036
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.187
NA
NA
NA
NA
37.286
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
» 2.970
* - 6.200
+ 0.104
+ 0.384
+ - 0.163
+ 0.174
+ 1.090
+ NR
+ - 0.147
+ - 0.022
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.035
+ - 1.010
+ - NR
+ - 0.023
-f - 0.026
+ - 0.037
+ - 0.017
+ NR
+ - 0.055
+ 0.018
+ - 0.027
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.103
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.320
23.900
0.239
0.612
0.230
0.595
7.990
<
0.466
0.014
0.023
0.070
2.750
<
0.013
0.016
0.119
<
<
<
0.001
0.013
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.163
NA
NA
NA
NA
42.922
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.200
+ - 4.800
+ - 0.048
+ - 0.120
+ - 0.046
+ 0.120
+ - 1.600
+ - NR
« - 0.094
+ 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.014
+ - 0.560
+ NR
+ - 0.003
+ - 0.004
+ 0.024
+ 0.002
+ - NR
+ 0.008
+ - 0.002
+ - 0.003
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.032
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE: 41109
RANKING: 2321
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
f -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
4- '
+ -
+ -
+ .
4- -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :REF. 48
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41109
41109
41109
41109
41109
48 (PAVED |J.A. COOPER,"DETERMINATION OF SOURCE
IROAD DUST|CONTRIBUTIONS TO FINE AND COURSE SUSPENDED
| IPARTICUUTE LEVELS IN PETERSVILLE, ALABAMA,"
| [REPORT TO TVA. NEA.INC. (1981)
[SOUTHEASTERN U.S. ROAD DUST RESUSPENDED AND
[SAMPLED WITH A DICHOTOMOUS SAMPLER.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35'
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
cs
BA
CE
HG
PB
(X
EC
S04
N03
PAVED ROAD
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.870
11.010
27.970
0.300
0.370
0.110
1.540
0.790
<
0.440
0.020
<
0.240
5.280
<
0,010
0.020
0.030
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.010
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.110
NA
NA
NA
NA
49.800
DUST - SPOKANE, WA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.150
+ - 0.780
+ - 1.930
+ 0.030
+ 0.100
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.130
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ 0.040
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.370
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.870
11.010
27.970
0.300
0.370
0.110
1.540
0.790
<
0.440
0.020
<
0.240
5.280
<
0.010
0.020
0.030
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.010
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.110
NA
NA
NA
NA
49.800
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.780
+ - 1.930
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.130
+ - 0.070
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.370
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.020
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
PROFILE: 41110
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
» -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 27.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE[SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41110 |
41110 |
41110 |
41110 |
41110 i
27 | PAVED
(ROAD
| DUST
I
I
|J.E CORE, ET. AL., "A STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL
(WOOD COMBUSTION TASK 1 -AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
(IMPACT ANALYSIS , "REPORT PREPARED FOR US
(EPA REGION X BY NEA, INC. (1982).
I
(RESUSPENDED PAVED ROAD DUST ANALYZED
(SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
I
I
I
BY XRF.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
MO
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
LA
HG
PB
N03
UNPAVED ROAD DUST (COPPER MINE)
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
14.618
28.738
0.282
1.532
0.215
3.204
3.420
<
0.331
0.030
0.025
0.186
4.371
<
<
1.436
0.535
<
<
0.046
<
<
<
0.024
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
NA
NA
0.117
NA
59.110
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.462
f - 2.874
+ - 0.028
+ 0.153
f - 0.021
+ 0.320
+ 0.342
+ - NR
+ - 0.033
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.019
+ - 0.437
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.144
+ - 0.053
f - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - ' NR
* - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - 0.016
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.012
+ - NR
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
<
10.448
22.471
0.218
1.817
0.185
3.097
4.028
<
0.402
0.031
0.023
0.160
4.441
<
0.012
1.431
0.546
<
<
0.065
<
<
0.019
0.034
<
<
0.029
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.023
NA
NA
0.100
NA
49.580
PROFILE: 41201
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
COARSE TSP
2 5*10UM ****** ********* <3Q u}4 ******
+- UNC % BY WT +- UNC
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 1.045 + -
+ - 2.247 + -
+ - 0.022 + -
+ - 0.182 + -
+ - 0.018 + -
+ - 0.310 +
+ 0.403 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.040 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.016 + -
+ 0.444 +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ 0.143 + -
+ - 0.055 + -
* NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ NR +
+ - 0.022 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< a LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNPAVED ROAD DUST IN A COPPER MINING AND CONCENTRATING PLANT COMPLEX.
REF. 44.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE(SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41201
41201
41201
41201
44 (SOIL DUSTJD. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (UNPAVED ROAD ON COPPER MINING AND
(MONTANA (CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE."STATE OF MONTANA (CONCENTRATING PLANT COMPLEX. BULK SAMPLE
| (OEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) (SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
49
22
23
24
25
26
46
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
47
48
50
51
56
57
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % }
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CU
K
CA
IN
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
PD
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
8A
LA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
UNPAVED ROAD DUST - HAUL ROAD
3-03-024-04
NONE
*********
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
17.765
34.358
0.427
2.810
0.726
3.504
1.128
0.045
0.420
0.035
0.027
0.288
4.364
<
0.012
1.393
0.568
<
0.030
<
0.014
<
0.029
<
<
<
0.034
<
<
0.274
<
<
<
0.170
NA
NA
NA
NA
68.421
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 1.776
+ 3.436
+ - 0.043
+ - 0.281
+ 0.073
+ 0.350
+ 0.113
+ - 0.038
+ - 0.042
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.436
+ - 0.017
+ NR
+ - 0.139
+ - 0.057
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.036
+ - 0.044
+ - 0.080
+ - 0.214
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.018
+ NR
+ - HR
+ - NR
+ - NR
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.872
25.981
0.241
2.277
0.496
3.554
1.671
<
0.501
0.035
0.021
0.255
3.779
<
<
0.989
0.504
<
0.016
<
<
0.020
0.029
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.064
<
<
<
0.102
NA
NA
NA
NA
53.407
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.287
+ - 2.598
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.228
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.355
+ - 0.167
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - MR
+ - NR
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.378
+ - KR
+ NR
+ - 0.099
+ - 0.050
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.018
+ - 0.049
+ - 0.076
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE: 41203
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3Q um ******
% BY UT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
f -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ .
4- -
+ .
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
( -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COPPER MINING HAUL ROAD. REF 44
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41202 |
41202 |
41202 |
41202 |
44 ISOIL DUST |D. MAUGHN, "BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: [UNPAVED ROAD NEAR A COPPER ORE
[MONTANA (CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE ."STATE OF MONTANA (CONCENTRATOR. BULK SAMPLE SIEVED AND
| IDEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) JRESUSPENDED.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
49
22
23
24
25
26
46
28
29
30
31
33
34
35
37
38
39
40
47
48
50
51
56
57
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
IN
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
PD
NI
CU
ZN
GA
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
Y
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
BA
LA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
UNPAVED ROAD DUST - HAUL ROAD
3-03-024-04
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
17.765
34.358
0.427
2.810
0.726
3.504
1.128
0.045
0.420
0.035
0.027
0.288
4.364
<
0.012
1.393
0.568
<
0.030
<
0.014
<
0.029
<
<
<
0.034
<
<
0.274
<
<
<
0.170
NA
NA
NA
NA
68.421
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
« - UNC
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.776
+ 3.436
+ - 0.043
+ - 0.281
+ - 0.073
+ - 0.350
+ - 0.113
+ - 0.038
+ 0.042
+ NR
* - NR
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.436
+ 0.017
+ NR
+ - 0.139
+ - 0.057
4- - NR
c - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* NR
+ NR
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.036
+ - 0.044
+ - 0.080
+ - 0.214
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.018
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
12.872 + -
25.981 + -
0.241 +
2.277 + -
0.496 + -
3.554 + -
1.671 +
< + -
0.501 + -
0.035 + -
0.021 + -
0.255 + -
3.779 +
< + -
< + -
0.989 + -
0.504 + -
< + -
0.016 + -
< + -
< + -
0.020 + -
0.029 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.064 + -
< + -
< + -
< -f -
0.102 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
53.407
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
1.287
2.598
0.024
0.228
0.050
0.355
0.167
NR
0.050
NR
NR
0.025
0.378
NR
NR
0.099
0.050
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.018
0.049
0.076
NR
NR
0.010
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41203
RANKING: 2311
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3g um ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ '
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : COPPER MINING HAUL ROAD. REF 44
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE |SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41203
41203
41203
41203
44 |SOIL DUST |D. MAUGHN,"BUTTE SOURCE APPORTIONMENT STUDY: (UNPAVED COPPER MINING HAUL ROAD.
[HAUL ROAD|CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE, "STATE OF MONTANA (SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
| IDEPT. HEALTH AND ENVIR. SCIENCES (1982) |
BULK
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
38
46
47
48
49
50
51
56
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SPECIES
NAME
BE
8
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
NI
CU
ZN
AS
SE
BR
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
S3
BA
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
UNPAVED ROAD DUST -EAST HELENA, MONTANA
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.343
37.418
0.224
0.419
0.181
1.725
6.194
0.741
0.039
0.021
0.049
2.340
<
0.013
0.028
<
<
<
0.027
0.052
<
<
<
<
0.028
0.320
<
0.042
NA
NA
NA
NA
63.204
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.334
+ - 3.742
+ 0.025
+ 0.060
+ 0.028
+ - 0.172
+ - 0.619
+ - 0.074
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.234
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.039
* - 0.042
+ - 0.046
+ 0.089
+ - 0.250
+ - NR
+ - 0.014
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.347
29.370
0.149
0.248
0.113
2.139
3.994
0.433
0.016
0.019
0.040
2.158
<
0.014
0.030
<
<
<
0.033
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.306
<
0.027
NA
NA
NA
NA
48.436
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.935
+ - 2.937
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.011
* - 0.214
+ - 0.399
+ - 0.043
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.216
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+' - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.014
+ - 0.047
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.937
32.679
0.154
0.236
0.125
2.242
3.854
0.473
0.023
0.021
0.037
2.213
<
0.024
0.029
<
<
<
0.037
<
<
<
<
<
0.011
0.270
<
0.035
NA
NA
NA
NA
41204
3321
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.994
+ - 3.268
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.024
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.224
+ - 0.385
+ - 0.047
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.221
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.015
+ - 0.051
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC= ORGANIC CARBON: EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON: NA
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT. REF. 43.
NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER {NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41204
41204
41204
41204
41204
43 (SOIL DUST|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE
[MONTANA (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO
j (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982)
IUNPAVED ROAD DUST COLLECTED NEAR A PRIMARY
ILEAD SMELTER AND ZINC AND COPPER OXIDE
(MANUFACTURING PLANTS. SAMPLES SIEVED AND
JRESUSPENDED.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - DES MOINES, IOWA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
SPECIES :
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUM( X )
FINE
NAME % BY WT + UNC
BE + -
B +
f +
NA + -
MG +
AL +
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL +
1C +
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR * -
MN + -
FE +
CO +
NI +
cu * -
ZN + -
GA +
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR- + -
RB + -
SR +
ZR + -
AG + -
CD +
SN + -
S8 + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG + -
PS + -
TC +
C03 + -
S04 + -
N03 * -
COARSE
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
3.717 + -
15.631 +
0.108 + -
0.746 + -
0.192 + -
0.596 + -
10.007 + -
< + -
0.197 + -
0.017 + -
0.017 + -
0.092 +
3.950 + -
< + -
0.006 + -
0.027 + -
0.044 + -
< + -
< + -
0.009 + -
< * -
0.006 + -
< + -
0.028 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.001 + -
< + -
0.033 + -
< + -
< + -
0.066 + -
1.962 +
24.651 + -
NA + -
NA + -
62.103
JM ******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.717
15.631
0.108
0.746
0.192
0.596
10.007
<
0.197
0.017
0.017
0.092
3.950
<
0.006
0.027
0.044
<
<
0.009
<
0.006
<
0.028
<
<
<
<
0.001
<
0.033
<
<
0.066
1.962
24.651
NA
NA
62.103
41301
2332
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
.+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
PER CITY. REF. 26
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDED SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE | REFERENCE | SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER [NUMBER | GROUP | |
41301 | 26 ISOIL DUSTJJ.E CORE, ET. AL-, "IOWA SOURCE |XRF, C,C03 ANALYSIS OF RESUSPENDED SOILS
41301 | | IOWA | APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA | FROM IOWA CITIES. DATA NORMALIZED TO 90% OF
41301 | | (REGION VII BY NEA.INC (1982). |MASS (MINOR CORRECTIONS). EACH SOIL SAMPLE
41301 | | | (WAS A COMPOSITE OF 3 SUBSAMPLES.
41301 III I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
HI
CU
2N
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
3A
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.280
11.120
27.336
0.336
0.380
0.024
0.719
0.864
<
0.440
0.039
<
0.144
4.989
<
<
0.008
0.042
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.021
<
<
0.039
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.107
NA
NA
NA
NA
47.888
OC = ORGANIC CARBON
- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON PROFILE: 41302
RANKING: 3334
RATING : C
FINE COARSE TSP
+ - UNC % BY WT +- UNC % BY WT +- UNC
+ NR + - + -
+ - NR + - + -
+ - NR + - +
4. - NR + + -
4- - 0.108 + + -
+ - 0.743 + - + -
+ - 1.780 + - + -
4- - 0.031 + - +
+ - 0.088 + - +
+ - 0.035 + - + -
+ - 0.066 + - +
+ - 0.070 + - + -
4. - NR + +
+ - 0.038 + - + -
+ - 0.009 + + -
+ NR + +
4. - 0.014 + - «
4. - 0.340 + - +
+ NR + - + -
4. - NR + + -
+ 0.006 + - + -
+ - 0.008 + - + -
4- - NR + - + -
+ - NR + +
+ - NR + + -
4. - NR + - + -
+ - NR ' + + -
+ - NR + - + -
+ - 0.008 + - + -
+ - NR + - + -
+ - NR + - + -
+ - 0.055 + - + -
4- - NR + - ' + -
+ NR + - +
+ NR + + -
+ - NR + - + -
4- - NR + - + -
4- - NR + - + -
4- - O.OE2 + - +
+ - NR + +
4. - NR + - +
+ - NR + - +
+ - NR + + -
0.000 0.000
: EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : RESUSPENDED LOCAL SOIL SAMPLES, FINE FRACTION, ONLY. EACH ANALYZED
SAMPLE IS A COMPOSITE OF THREE SOIL SAMPLES. REF. 27
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41302
41302
41302
41302
41302
27 (SOIL DUST|J.E. CORE, ET.AL.,"A STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL
[WASHINGTONWOOO COMBUSTION TASK 1: AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
| (IMPACT ANALYSIS," REPORT PREPARED FOR EPA
| IREGIOM x BY NEA, INC. <1982)
(SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VACINITY OF
(AIR SAMPLING SITES. RESUSPENDED THRU A
IDICHOTOMOUS IMPACTOR AND ANALYZED BY XRF AND
(CARBON OXIDATION METHODS. NA.MG BY I UNA.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE: SOIL DUST -
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
SPECIES ********* <
NAME % BY WT
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
P8
OC
EC
S04
N03
0.000
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
VISALIA, CALIFORNIA PROFILE: 41303
RANKING: UNKNOWN
RATING : D
FINE COARSE TSP
+ - UNC % BY WT + UNC % BY WT +-
* - + - NR +
+ - + - NR + -
+ - + NR + -
+ - + - 1.200 + -
+ - + - 0.400 + -
+ - + - 5.000 + -
+ - + - 19.700 + -
+ - + - < -r -
+ - + - 0.300 + -
+ - + - 0.200 + -
+ - + - 1.500 + -
+ - + - 2.500 + -
+ + - < + -
* - + - 0.200 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - 3.000 + -
* - + - < + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - 0.050 + -
+ + - 0.050 + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - ' 0.050 « -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
f - + - < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ - + < + -
+ - + - < + -
+ + - 0.300 + -
+ - + - 0.300 + -
+ - + - 0.300 + -
+ - + - 0.200 + -
+ - + NR + -
+ + - NR + -
+ + - NR + -
+ - + - NR +
0.000 35.450
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AVERAGE VALUE FROM SEVEN LOCATIONS
UNKNOWN. REF. 31
IN AND AROUND VISALIA. ANALYTICAL METHODS
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER [NUMBER {GROUP | |
41303 | 31 |SOIL DUSTJJ.T. LEACH , G. BATES AND L. STANFIELD, [UNSPECIFIED ANALYSIS OF SEVEN SOILS IN AND
41303 | [CALIF. |SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PARTICULATE STUDY," [AROUND VISALIA, CA.
41303 | | (UNPUBLISHED (1979) |
41303 111 I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST -
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.040
29.675
<
7.323
0.743
1.563
1.230
<
0.370
<
0.061
0.136
4.138
<
0.028
<
0.280
<
<
<
<
0.280
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.143
NA
NA
NA
NA
55.010
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 2.299
+ - 7.270
» NR
+ - 2.135
+ - 0.390
+ - 4.680
+ - 0.365
+ - NR
+ - 0.129
+ - NR
+ - 0.061
+ - 0.074
+ 1.069
+ NR
+ - 0.051
+ NR
+ - 0.101
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.106
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.436
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
7.581 + -
30.660 + -
< -f -
0.302 + -
0.171 + -
1.500 + -
2.030 +
< +
0.416 + -
0.016 + -
0.032 + -
0.120 + -
3.535 + -
< + -
0.006 + -
< + -
0.071 +
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.003 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i-
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
0.083 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA * -
46.526
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.433
1.684
NR
0.064
0.031
0.099
0.124
NR
0.030
0.006
0.006
0.010
0.206
NR
0.003
NR
0.009
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.004
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.016
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
7.581
30.660
<
0.302
0.171
1.500
2.030
<
0.416
0.016
0.032
0.120
3.535
<
0.006
<
0.071
<
<
<
<
0.003
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.083
NA
NA
NA
NA
46.526
41304
3334
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.433
+ - 1.684
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.099
+ - 0.124
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ 0.006
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.206
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ - 0.009
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.004
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.016
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REENTRAINED NATIVE SOILS. ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE COMPOSITE OF THREE SUBSAMPLES
COLLECTED IN A RURAL AREA. REF. 32
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER I GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41304
41304
41304
41304
32 [SOIL DUSTJJ.E. CORE, J.A. COOPER R.T. DECESAR AND J.E. [SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM A MIX OF 3 SUBSAMPLES |
| INDIANA |HOUCH, "SOUTH BEND, INDIANA AEROSOL STUDY", (OBTAINED IN A RURAL AREA NEAR SOUTH BEND. TSP|
| JNEA, IMC. (1981) (COMPOSITION ASSUMED SIMILAR TO COARSE MODE. |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST- HOUSTON, TEXAS
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE COARSE
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NUMBER NAME % BY UT + - UNC % BY WT + UNC
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUMC % )
BE +
B + -
F + -
NA +
MG + -
AL +
SI + -
P +
S + -
CL +
K + -
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR + -
MN + -
FE +
CO + -
NI + -
CU + -
ZN + -
GA +
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR +
RB + -
SR +
ZR + -
AG + -
CD + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS +
BA + -
CE + -
HG + -
PB +
OC +
EC * -
S04 + -
N03 + -
34.800
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
5.600 + -
17.200 + -
< + -
< -f -
< + -
0.900 + -
7.000 + -
< + -
0.400 + -
< + -
< + -
0.060 + -
2.800 + -
< + -
< + -
0.500 + -
0.300 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.040 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
34.800
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2.800
5.300
NR
NR
NR
0.135
1.050
NR
0.060
NR
NR
0.009
0.420
NR
NR
0.075
0.045
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.006
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41305
RANKING: 3321
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3QUM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
5.600 + -
17.200 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.900 + -
7,000 + -
< +
0.400 + -
< + -
< + -
0.060 + -
2.800 + -
< + -
< + -
0.500 + -
0.300 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.040 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA * -
34.800
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
2.800
5.300
NR
NR
NR
0.135
1.050
NR
0.060
NR
NR
0.009
0.420
NR
NR
0.075
0.045
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.006
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 40
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT |
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP | [ |
I
41305 | 40 [SOIL DUST|R. K. STEVENS, ET. AL.," MATHEMATICAL AND [RESTRAINED SOIL DUST SAMPLES ANALYZED BY XRF|
41305 | [TEXAS [EMPIRICAL RECEPTOR MODELS: QHAIL ROOST II" | |
41305 | | [U.S. EPA ORD ESRL. RTP,NC (1983). | |
41305 III I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
2N
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST -
NONE
NONE
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
1.000
2.000
18.000
48.000
<
0.240
0.200
2.000
1.800
<
0.760
0.030
0.020
0.280
8.500
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.080
NA
NA
NA
NA
82.960
EAST HELENA, MONTANA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.200
* - 0.700
+ - 1.000
+ - 2.000
+ - NR
* - 0.150
+ - 0.080
+ 0.100
+ - 0.100
* - NR
+ - 0.060
« 0.020
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.500
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.030
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.060
+ NR
f - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
1.100 + -
1.900 + -
9.500 + -
29.000 + -
< + -
0.200 + -
0.120 +
1.800 + -
1.730 +
< + -
0.790 + -
0.030 + -
0.030 + -
0.170 + -
6.900 + -
< + -
< -i- -
0.020 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< +
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.010 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
53.300
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.300
0.500
1.000
NR
0.020
NR
0.100
0.090
NR
0.040
NR
NR
NR
0.300
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41306
RANKING: 3324
RATING : 3
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
f -
+ -
-t- -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
> .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+
+ -
t- -
0.000
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 43
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP | (
41306 | 43 (SOIL DUST|J.E.HOUCH,ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE (R6SUSPENDED SOIL DUST FROM EAST HELENA.
41306 | (MONTANA (APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO (ANALYZED BY XRF,ONLY.
41306 | | (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1932) |
41306 I .I I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST -
NONE
NONE
IDAHO
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
1.000
2.000
18.000
48.000
<
0.240
0.200
2.000
1.800
<
0.760
0.030
0.020
0.280
8.500
<
<
0.050
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.080
NR
NR
NR
NR
82.960
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.200
+ - 0.700
+ - 1.000
+ - 2.000
+ - NR
+ - 0.150
+ 0.080
+ - 0.100
+ - 0.100
+ NR
+ 0.060
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.030
+ 0.500
+ NR
+ NR
+ 0.030
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.060
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
MA
1.100
1.900
9.500
29.000
<
0.200
0.120
1.800
1.730
<
0.790
0.030
0.030
0.170
6.900
<
<
<
0.020
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.010
NA
NA
NA
NA
53.300
CARBON : NA
PROFILE: 41307
RANKING: 3324
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2 5'IOUM ****** ********* <3Q (j|^ ******
+- UNC % BY WT +- UNC
+ NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.100 + -
+ - 0.300 +
+ - 0.500 +
+ - 1.000 + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.020 +
+ - NR +
+ 0.100 + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.040 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.300 + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
0.000
= NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 42. LEWISTON, IDAHO.
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFIL£|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP | [
41307 | 42 |SOIL DUST|J.A. COOPER,"POTLATCH CORPORATION AEROSOL [RESUSPENDED SOIL DUST FROM LEWISTON, IDAHO.
41307 | |IDAHO (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," FINAL REPORT TO THE (ANALYZED BY XRF.
41307 | | JPOTLATCH CORPORATION BY NEA, INC. SEPT. 1979 |
41307 .
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - CRESTON, IOWA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM
NUMBER NAME % BY WT + -
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUMC % )
BE + -
8 + -
F + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL + -
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL + -
1C + -
CA + -
SC +
TI + -
V 4- -
CR + -
MN + -
FE + -
CO +
NI +
CU + -
ZN + -
GA 4-
GE +
AS 4- -
SE + -
BR + -
RB +
SR + -
ZR +
AG +
CD +
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA +
CE + -
HG +
PB +
TC + -
C03 4- -
S04 4-
N03 +
0.000
COARSE
UNC % BY UT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
3.109 + -
13.039 + -
0.105 + -
0.824 + -
0.262 + -
0.786 +
15.195 + -
< + -
0.199 + -
0.014 + -
0.020 + -
0.072 + -
3.390 + -
< + -
0.006 + -
0.018 + -
0.047 + -
< + -
< 4- -
0.018 + -
< + -
0.003 + -
< + -
0.047 + -
< * -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< 4- -
0.039 + -
< +
0.002 + -
0.037 +
1.791 + -
28.368 + -
NA +
NA +
67.391
IM ******
UNC
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41308
RANKING: 2332
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3g UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA *
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
3.109 + -
13.039 +
0.105 + -
0.824 + -
0.262 + -
0.786 + -
15.195 + -
< + -
0.199 + -
0.014 + -
0.020 + -
0.072 + -
3.390 * -
< + -
0.006 +
0.018 + -
0.047 + -
< 4- -
< 4-
0.018 + -
< 4- -
0.003 + -
< +
0.047 + -
< 4- -
< 4- -
< + -
< 4- -
< 41 -
< 4- -
0.039 * -
< 4- -
0.002 + -
0.037 + -
1.791 + -
28.368 + -
NA 4- -
NA + -
67.391
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
REF. 26
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDED SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER (NUMBER | GROUP | j
41308 | 26 ISOIL DUST|J.E CORE, ET. AL., "IOWA SOURCE (RESUSPENDEO SOILS ANALYZED BY XRF AND CARBON
41308 | | IOWA | APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA (OXIDATION. TSP FRACTION. CR£STON,IOWA
41308 | | (REGION VII BY NEA.INC (1982). |
41308 111 I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUM( % )
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - COUNCIL BLUFFS, I
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE
NAME X BY WT + - UNC
BE + -
B + -
F + -
NA +
MG +
AL + -
SI + -
P + -
S +
CL +
K + -
CA +
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR +
MN +
FE +
CO + -
NI + -
CU + -
ZN + -
GA * -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR + -
RB + -
SR + -
ZR * -
AG + -
CD + -
SN +
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG f
PB + -
TC + -
C03 + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
[QUA
iiititirititir'Jt'lt
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.160
21.693
0.120
0.629
0.198
1.138
7.225
<
0.287
0.019
0.016
0.068
2.301
<
0.006
0.008
0.064
<
<
0.005
<
0.015
<
0.026
<
<
<
<
0.209
<
0.049
<
<
0.069
2.295
12.495
NA
NA
54.095
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*#*******
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.160
21.693
0.120
0.629
0.198
1.138
7.225
<
0.287
0.019
0.016
0.068
2.301
<
0.006
0.008
0.064
<
<
0.005
<
0.015
<
0.026
<
<
<
<
0.209
<
0.049
<
<
0.069
2.295
12.495
NA
NA
54.095
41309
2332
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
PER CITY. REF. 26.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDED SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE(SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP | j
41309 | 26 JSOIL DUST|J.E CORE, ET. AL., "IOWA SOURCE |RESUSPENDEO SOILS ANALYZED BY XRF AND CARBON
41309 | |IOWA [APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA (OXIDATION. TSP FRACTION. COUNCIL BLUFFS,IOWA
41309 | | [REGION VII BY NEA.INC (1982). |
41309 III I -I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - SIOUX CITY, IOWA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
SPECIES !
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUM( % )
FINE
NAME % BY WT + - UNC
BE + -
B + -
f + -
NA + -
MG +
AL +
SI +
P + -
S +
CL + -
K + -
CA * -
SC +
TI + -
V + -
CR +
MN +
FE +
CO + -
NI +
CU + -
ZN + -
GA + -
GE +
AS + -
SE +
BR + -
RB +
SR +
ZR +
AG + -
CD +
SN + -
SB + -
CS +
BA + -
CE + -
HG +
PS + -
TC + -
C03 + -
S04 + -
N03 * -
0.000
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.926
20.697
0.094
0.220
0.100
1.055
3.998
<
0.319
0.021
0.017
0.153
3.011
<
0.007
0.005
0.035
<
<
0.005
<
0.002
<
0.018
<
<
<
<
0.001
<
0.114
<
<
0.042
2.313
17.971
NA
NA
55.124
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - MR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.926
20.697
0.094
0.220
0.100
1.055
3.998
<
0.319
0.021
0.017
0.153
3.011
<
0.007
0.005
0.035
<
<
0.005
<
0.002
<
0.018
<
<
<
<
0.001
<
0.114
<
<
0.042
2.313
17.971
NA
NA
55.124
41310
2332
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
"
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
PER CITY. REF. 26
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR
NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDED SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER {NUMBER |GROUP | |
41310 | 26 (SOIL DUSTJJ.E CORE, ET. AL., "IOWA SOURCE |RESUSPENDED SOILS ANALYZED BY XRF AND CARBON
41310 | |IOWA (APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA (OXIDATION. TSP FRACTION. SIOUX CITY.IOUA
41310 | | IREGION vii BY NEA.INC (1982). |
41310 III I I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
1
1
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUM( % )
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - CEDAR RAPIDS, 10V
SCO: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE
NAME % BY WT + UNC
BE -f -
B + -
F + -
NA +
MG + -
AL + -
SI +
P +
S +
CL + -
K +
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR + -
MN +
FE + -
CO + -
NI +
CU + -
ZN + -
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE +
BR +
R8 + -
SR + -
ZR +
AG + -
CD * -
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG +
PB +
TC + -
C03 + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
JA
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.906
7.171
0.040
0.895
0.360
0.821
25.808
<
0.088
0.005
0.005
0.138
0.865
<
0.005
0.003
0.029
<
<
0.001
<
0.002
<
0.026
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.029
3.222
36.189
NA
NA
77.608
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ MR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.906
7.171
0.040
0.895
0.360
0.821
25.808
<
0.088
0.005
0.005
0.138
0.865
<
0.005
0.003
0.029
<
<
0.001
<
0.002
<
0.026
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.029
3.222
36.189
NA
NA
77.608
41311
2332
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
REF. 26.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDED SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES PER CITY.
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP | |
41311 | 26 (SOIL DUST|J.E CORE, ET. AL., "IOWA SOURCE (RESUSPENDED SOILS ANALYZED 8Y XRF AND CARBON
41311 | [IOWA [APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA (OXIDATION. TSP FRACTION. CEDAR RAPIDS,IOWA
41311 | | IREGION vn BY NEA.INC (1982). |
41311 III -I |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - DAVENPORT, IOWA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
SPECIES :
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
205
203
204
SUM( % )
FINE
NAME % BY WT + UNC
BE + -
8 + -
F + -
NA +
MG + -
AL +
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL + -
K +
CA + -
SC + -
TI + -
V + -
CR + -
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI + -
CU + -
ZN + -
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR + -
RB + -
SR + -
ZR + -
AG * -
CD + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA +
CE + -
HG + -
PB + -
TC + -
C03 + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.333 + -
7.958 + -
0.057 + -
0.663 + -
0.314 + -
0.602 +
20.428 + -
< + '
0,163 + -
0.009 + -
0.011 + -
0.070 + -
1.502 +
< + -
0.007 + -
0.014 +
0.060 + -
< + '
< +
0.008 + -
< *
0.003 + -
< + -
0.052 + -
< +
< + *
< + -
< + -
< + *
< + '
< + -
< + '
< + -
0.123 + -
3.942 + -
37.206 +
NA +
NA +
75.525
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41312
RANKING: 2332
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3o UM
% BY WT +-
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
2.333 + -
7.958 + -
0.057 + -
0.663 + -
0.314 + -
0.602 + -
20.428 + -
< + -
0.163 + -
0.009 + -
0.011 + -
0.070 + -
1.502 + -
< + -
0.007 + -
0.014 + -
0.060 + -
< + -
< +
0.008 + -
< + -
0.003 + -
< + -
0.052 +
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.123 +
3.942 + -
37.206 + -
NA + -
NA + -
75.525
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARSON :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : UNCERTAINTIES 10% OF VALUE.
REF. 26.
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NR = NOT REPORTED
RESUSPENDcD SOILS; COMPOSITE OF 3 SAMPLES PER CITY.
-------
13-JUH-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP | |
41312 | 26 JSOIL DUST|J.E CORE, ET. AL., "IOWA SOURCE |RESUSPENDED SOILS ANALYZED BY XRF AND CARBON
41312 | |IOWA [APPORTIONMENT STUDY," REPORT TO US EPA [OXIDATION. TSP FRACTION. DAVENPORT,IOWA
41312 | [ [REGION VII BY NEA.INC (1982). j
41312 III I -I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
32
201
202
203
204
SUMC X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.866
11.010
27.975
0.299
0.036
0.112
1.545
0.795
<
0.442
0.025
<
0.240
5.280
<
0.010
0.180
0.027
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.013
<
<
0.053
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.106
NA
NA
NA
NA
50.014
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
< = LESS
THAN DETECTION
* - NR
^ - NR
( - NR
< NR
* - 0.154
f 0.778
^ 1.935
f - 0.031
f - 0.096
» - 0.045
f - 0.127
* - 0.070
* NR
* - 0.040
« - 0.009
* - NR
* - 0.022
* - 0.375
* - NR
* - 0.008
« - 0.007
« 0.007
* NR
* - NR
» - NR
* NR
v NR
* - NR
* - 0.009
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.025
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
EC = ELEMENTAL
LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : RESUSPENDED LOCAL
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.866
11.010
27.975
0.299
0.036
0.112
1.545
0.795
<
0.442
0.025
<
0.240
5.280
<
0.010
0.180
0.027
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.013
<
<
0.053
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.106
NA
NA
NA
NA
50.014
CARBON : NA
SOIL SAMPLES,
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.154
+ - 0.778
+ - 1.935
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.096
+ - 0.045
+ - 0.127
+ - 0.070
+ NR
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.009
+ - NR
+ - 0.022
+ - 0.375
+ - NR
+ - 0.008
+ 0.007
+ - 0.007
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.009
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ 0.025
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
= NOT ANALYZED : NR
FINE FRACTION, ONLY.
PROFILE: 41313
RANKING: 3334
RATING : 3
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
t- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
f -
+ -
f -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000 '
= NOT REPORTED
EACH ANALYZED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RETERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41313
41313
41313
41313
41313
27 |SOIL DUSTJJ.E CORE, ET. AL., "A STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL
IUASHINGTONWOOO COMBUSTION TASK 1-AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
| |IMPACT ANALYSIS ."REPORT PREPARED FOR US
| |EPA REGION X BY NEA, INC. (1982).
IRESUSPENOED SOIL DUST FROM
[SPOKANE,WASHINGTON AREA. XRF ANALYSIS OF
IFINE FRACTION.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST - BOISE, IDAHO
NONE
NONE
FINE COARSE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.904
8.160
30.273
0.243
0.524
0.083
1.740
1.268
<
0.439
0.033
<
0.097
3.406
<
<
0.007
0.081
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.035
<
<
0.068
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.205
NA
NA
NA
NA
47.566
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.068 + -
* - 0.460 + -
+ - 1.660 + -
+ - 0.021 + -
+ 0.080 + -
+ - 0.030 +
+ - 0.122 + -
+ - 0.081 + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.032 + -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.009 + -
+ - 0.199 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.004 + -
+ 0.009 +
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
f - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - 0.040 + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.022 + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR * -
0.000
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 41314
RANKING: 3334
RATING : B
TSP
********* <30 UM ******
X BY UT +- UNC
+ .
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : RESUSPENOED LOCAL SOIL SAMPLES, FINE FRACTION, ONLY. EACH ANALYZED
SAMPLE IS A COMPOSITE OF THREE SOIL SAMPLES. REF. 27.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41314
41314
41314
41314
41314
27 (SOIL OUST|J.E CORE. ET. AL., "A STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL
(IDAHO (WOOD COMBUSTION TASK 1-AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
| (IMPACT ANALYSIS /'REPORT PREPARED FOR US
| (EPA REGION X BY NEA, INC. (1982).
(RESUSPENDED SOIL DUST FROM
(BOISE, IDAHO. XRF ANALYSIS OF
|FINE FRACTION.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - BAKERSFIELD , CALIFORNIA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
FINE COARSE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC
BE + + -
B + - + -
F + - + -
NA + - +
MG + - +
AL + - * -
SI + +
p + - + -
S + - +
CL + - + -
K + +
CA + - +
SC + +
TI f - + -
V + - + -
CR + - +
MN + - + -
FE + + -
CO * - + -
NI + - + -
CU + + -
ZN + + -
GA + + -
GE + - + -
AS + - + -
SE + - + -
BR + - +
RB + - + -
SR + + -
ZR + - + -
AG + - + -
CD + - + -
SN + + -
SB + + -
CS + - + -
BA + + -
CE + - + -
HG + - + -
PB + - + -
OC + +
EC + + -
S04 + - +
N03 + +
0.000 0.000
OC ^ ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 41315
RANKING: UNKNOWN
RATING : D
TSP
********* <3g UM
X BY WT +-
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
0.800 + -
0.600 + -
4.700 + -
14.000 + -
< +
0.500 +
0.200 * -
1.500 +
1.800 * -
< + -
0.200 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
3.200 + -
< + -
0.050 +
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
< + -
< +
< + -
< + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.050 + -
0.200 + -
0.200 + -
0.200 + -
0.200 + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
29.050
NR = NOT REPORTED
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AVERAGE VALUES FROM SEVEN LOCATIONS NEAR BAKERSFIELD.
UNKNOWN. REF. 31.
ANALYTICAL METHODS
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP | |
41315 | 31 (SOIL DUSTJJ.T. LEACH, G BATES AND L STANFIELD,"SAN (AVERAGE VALUES FROM SEVEN LOCATIONS NEAR
41315 | (CALIF JJOAQUIN VALLEY PARTICULATE MATTER (BAKERSFI LED.REPORT IS OBSCURE AND COULD NOT
41315 | | |STUDY."UNPUBLISHED. 1979 (BE LOCATED.MAY HAVE BEEN AUTHORED BY PEDCO
41315 | | | (ENVIRONMENTAL. DATA NORMALIZED TO 1.5% 1C.
41315 III I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE: SOIL DUST - PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
SCC: NONE
CONTROLS: NONE
PROFILE: 41316
RANKING: UNKNOWN
RATING : D
FINE COARSE
SPECIES SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NUMBER NAME % BY WT + - UNC % BY WT +- UNC
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE + -
B + -
F +
NA + -
MG +
AL + -
SI + -
P » -
S +
CL + -
K + -
CA + -
SC +
TI + -
V + -
CR +
MN + -
FE + -
CO + -
NI + -
CU +
ZN +
GA + -
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR +
RB + -
SR +
ZR + -
AG + -
CD + -
SN +
SB +
CS + -
BA -i- -
CE + -
HG + -
PB + -
OC + -
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
0.000
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
2.500 + -
1.400 + -
8.200 + -
20.000 + -
NR +
NR + -
NR +
1.500 + -
1.500 + -
NR +
0.400 + -
0.006 + -
NR +
0.110 +
3.200 + -
0.002 +
0.004 + -
0.008 + -
< + -
NR +
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR +
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
0.060 + -
NR + -
NR + -
0.020 + -
NR +
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
38.910
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
MR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
TSP
********* <3Q UM
% BY WT +
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
2.500 + -
1.400 + -
8.200 + -
20.000 + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
1.500 + -
1.500 + -
NR + -
0.400 + -
0.006 + -
NR +
0.110 + -
3.200 + -
0.002 + -
0.004 + -
o.ooa + -
< +
NR +
NR * -
NR + -
NR + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
NR * -
NR * -
NR + -
0.060 + -
NR +
NR + -
0.020 + -
NR +
NR + -
NR + -
NR + -
38.910
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AVERAGE VALUE FROM SEVEN LOCATIONS NEAR AROUND PASADENA.
UNKNOWN. REF. 30
ANALYTICAL METHODS
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41316
41316
41316
41316
30 (SOIL OUSTJS.K. FRIEDLANOER,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCES
(CALIF. |ANO IDENTIFICATION OF AIR POLLUTION
| (SOURCES," ES&T. MARCH 1973.
(UNSPECIFIED ANALYSIS OF SOILS IN AND AROUND
(PASADENA, CAL.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< X )
BE
B
F
NA
HG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST MEOFORD. OR.
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
1.500
1.900
9.500
26.600
NA
0.090
0.070
0.920
1.800
NA
1.000
0.024
0.024
0.160
5.300
NA
0.007
0.030
0.009
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
0.011
4.400
0.600
0.100
0.100
54.055
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.500
+ - 0.600
+ 0.100
+ - 1.400
+ NR
+ - 0.040
* - 0.050
* 0.330
+ - 0.400
+ NR
* - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ 0.600
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ 0.020
+ - 0.003
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.700
+ - 0.400
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.040
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA * -
NA +
1.700 + -
1.500 + -
8.900 + -
2.700 + -
NA + -
0.070 + -
NA +
0.750 + -
1.800 +
NA + -
0.700 + -
0.033 + -
0.026 * -
0.180 + -
5.500 +
NA + -
0.007 + -
0.030 + -
0.011 + -
NA +
< + -
< + -
< +
< + -
NA + -
< 4 -
NA + -
NA + -
< + -
NA + -
< + -
NA + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
NA +
3.700 + -
0.700 + -
0.060 + -
NA + -
28.297
NR
NR
NR
0.400
0.300
0.200
1.400
NR
0.050
NR
0.160
0.200
NR
0.200
NR
NR
0.050
0.800
NR
0.003
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.700
0.700
0.060
NR
PROFILE: 41318
RANKING: 3328
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY UT +-
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
0.000
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP | |
41318 | 45 |SOIL DUST|R.T.DECESAR AND J.A. COOPER,"MEDFORD AEROSOL |COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLES FROM MEDFORD, OREGON
41318 | [OREGON [CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE (RESUSPENDED AND SAMPLED USING A TWO-STAGE
41318 ] | [OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON [VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
41318 | | (GRADUATE CENTER (1980) | |
41318 III I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
f
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
R8
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
SOIL DUST- PORTLAND, OREGON
NONE
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC
NA
NA
NA
0.690
1.760
11.700
25.400
<
0.070
<
1.000
0.930
<
0.760
0.025
0.030
0.200
6.800
<
<
0.020
0.041
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.006
4.320
0.590
NA
NA
54.342
OC = ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR
+ - MR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.380
+ - 0.620
+ - 2.200
+ 3.400
+ - NR
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.280
+ - 0.370
+ - NR
+ - 0.240
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.008
+ - 0.090
+ - 2.300
+ - NR
+ 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ 0.026
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
* NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.002
* - 1.700
+ - 0.380
+ - 0.050
+ - 1.000
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.002
1.300
1.200
7.200
29.700
<
<
<
2.200
1.400
<
0.820
0.017
0.010
0.085
4.760
<
0.009
0.020
0.041
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.042
4.320
0.590
0.004
0.009
53.729
CARBON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.500
+ 0.310
+ - 1.700
+ - 1.500
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - 0.240
+ - 0.670
+ - NR
* 0.150
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.006
+ - 0.028
+ 0.850
+ - NR
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.004
+ - 0.026
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - MR
+ - 0.010
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
» NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.011
+ - 1.730
+ - 0.380
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.005
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 41319
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
TSP
********* <3g UH ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ -
+ -
+
+
+
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+> -
+ -
+
+ -
+ '
+ -
+. -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :REF. 46. ORIGIONAL OC.EC DATA CORRECTED BY SHAH (REF. 54).
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
41319
46,54 (SOIL DUST|J. G.WATSON, "CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
[OREGON (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
(FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
(IN PORTLAND, OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTER (1979)
| AND
(JITENDRA J. SHAH, "MEASUREMENTS OF
(COMPOSITE OF SOIL REPRESENTATIVE OF
(PORTLAND, OREGON. SAMPLES WERE SUSPENDED
(AND SAMPLED WITH A TWO-STAGE VIRTUAL
| IMPACTOR.
I
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL ACROSS THE U.S.: SOURCES | WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
| AND ROLE IN VISIBILITY DEGREDATION,"PHD
(THESIS, OREGON GRADUATE CENTER. MAY, 1981.
(TABLE A. 2.
I
I
I
I
I
| (2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
(UM.D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATION (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
1
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM< % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
'S04
N03
SOIL DUST -
NONE
NONE
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
1.500
1.900
9.500
26.600
NA
0.090
0.070
0.920
1.800
NA
1.000
0.024
0.024
0.160
5.300
NA
0.007
0.030
0.009
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
0.011
4.400
0.600
0.100
0.100
54.055
ALABAMA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - 0.500
* - 0.600
+ - 0.100
+ 1.400
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.330
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.070
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ 0.003
+ - 0.030
+ - 0.003
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.700
« - 0.400
* - 0.040
+ - 0.040
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA +
NA + -
1.700 +
1.500 + -
8.900 + -
27.000 + -
NA + -
0.070 + -
NA +
0.750 + -
1.800 + -
NA +
0.700 + -
0.033 + -
0.026 + -
0.180 + -
5.500 + -
NA + -
0.007 + -
0.030 + -
0.011 + -
NA + -
< +
< + -
< + -
< +
NA * -
< + -
NA +
NA + -
< + -
NA +
< + -
NA + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
NA + -
3.700 +
0.700 + -
0.060 + -
NA +
52.597
NR
NR
NR
0.400
0.300
0.200
1.400
NR
0.050
NR
0.160
0.200
NR
0.200
NR
NR
0.050
0.800
NR
0.003
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.700
0.700
0.060
NR
PROFILE: 41320
RANKING: 3321
RATING : C
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
41320 |
41320 |
41320 |
41320 |
41320 (
48 (SOIL DUST|J.A. COOPER, "DETERMINATION OF SOURCE
(ALABAMA (CONTRIBUTIONS TO FINE AND COURSE SUSPENDED
| (PARTICULATE LEVELS IN PETERSVILLE, ALABAMA,'
| (REPORT TO TVA. NEA,INC. (1981)
(ALABAMA ROAD DUST RESUSPENDED AND SAMPLED
(WITH A DICHOTOMOUS SAMPLER.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
PD
AG
CD
IN
SN
SB
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
ROAD SAND AND SALT MIXTURE
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
13.453
33.403
0.393
0.977
8.375
1.425
3.735
<
0.385
0.030
0.037
0.122
4.970
<
0.020
0.292
0.253
<
<
<
<
0.016
<
0.027
0.036
0.057
<
<
0.032
<
<
<
<
0.253
NA
NA
NA
NA
68.291
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.345
+ - 3.340
+ 0.039
* - 0.105
+ - 0.837
+ 0.142
+ - 0.373
+ - NR
+ - 0.038
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.497
+ NR
+ NR
+ - 0.029
+ - 0.025
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.023
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.044
+ - 0.052
+ - 0.058
+ - 0.107
+ - 0.285
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.027
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
7.848 + -
20.909 + -
0.260 + -
0.706 + -
8.832 * -
1.194 + -
2.387 +
< +
0.353 + -
0.022 + -
0.025 + -
0.087 + -
3.775 + -
< »
< + -
0.169 + -
0.123 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.021 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.107 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
46.818
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.785
2.091
0.026
0.071
0.883
0.119
0.239
NR
0.035
MR
NR
NR
0.377
NR
NR
0.017
0.012
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.011
NR
NR
NR
NR
PROFILE: 41401
RANKING: 3321
RATING : C
TSP
********* <30 UM
% BY UT +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
8.638 + -
23.964 + -
0.260 + -
0.754 + -
10.095 + -
1.191 +
2.388 + -
< + -
0.388 + -
0.023 + -
0.025 + -
0.089 + -
4.059 + -
< + '
< + -
0.151 +
0.052 + -
< + -
< ( -
< + -
< -
< + -
< + -
0.026 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.049 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
52.152
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.864
2.396
0.026
0.075
1.009
0.119
0.239
NR
0.039
NR
NR
NR
0.406
NR
NR
0.015
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.027
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :STATE OF MONTANA. REF. 43.
NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP | |
41401 | 43 |ROAD SAND|J.E.HOUCH.ET.AL.,"EAST HELENA SOURCE {WINTER ROAD SANDING AND SALTING MIXTURE.
41401 | |& SALT |APPORTIONMENT STUDY,"DRAFT FINAL REPORT TO (SAMPLE SIEVED AND RESUSPENDED.
41401 I | (THE STATE OF MONTANA. NEA, INC.(1982) [
41401 III I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % >
NOTES: OC
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD STOVES-PINE FUEL
NONE
NONE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
0.100
0.100
1.000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
38.700
4.500
NA
NA
44.400
= ORGANIC CARBON :
+ NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR *
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - MR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR * -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
0.000
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 42101
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
f
+
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
4- -
f -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
4- -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
4-
4- -
4- -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : VALUES REPORTED ARE EMISSION WEIGHTED VALUES CALCULATED FROM EARLY, MIDDLE
AND LATE - STAGE EMISSION PROFILES. REF. 33.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER |GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
42101
42101
42101
42101
42101
42101
42101
42101
42101
33 |WOOD |D. C. STILES, "EVALUATION OF AN S2 SAMPLER
|STOVES (FOR RECEPTOR MODELING OF UOODSTOVE
| (EMISSIONS, " PROCEEDINGS OF THE 76TH ANNUAL
| (MEETING, APCA (1983). PAPER 83-54.8.
I I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED FROM UOODSTOVE BURNING OF
(PINE WOOD WITH 10% MOISTURE.
|SIZE-RESOLVED SAMPLES (FINE, ONLY) TAKEN
(USING A DILUTION TUNNEL. XRF AND CARBON
(OXIDATION ANALYSIS.LESS THAN VALUES ARE <0.1%
(FUELS PROFILE BASED ON EMISSION WEIGHED
(AVERAGE OF 6 SAMPLES.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
&Z
201
202
203
204
SUM( % }
NOTES:
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
co
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
cs
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD STOVES-AVERAGE, ALL FUELS
NONE
NONE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
1.800
0.800
8.000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
35.900
6.400
NA
NA
52.900
OC » ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR * -
+ NR *
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR +
* - NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
- NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR « -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR +
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
* - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR +
0.000
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 42102
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
********* <2.5 UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
f
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
( -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAU DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : VALUES REPORTED ARE EMISSION WEIGHTED VALUES CALCULATED FROM EARLY, MIDDLE
AND LATE STAGE EMISSION PROFILES. REF. 33.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER |GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
I
42102
42102
42102
42102
42102
42102
42102
42102
33 IUOOD jo. c. STILES, "EVALUATION OF AN S2 SAMPLER
|STOVE |FOR RECEPTOR MODELING OF UOODSTOVE
(EMISSIONS, " PROCEEDINGS OF THE 76TH ANNUAL
(MEETING, APCA (1983). PAPER 83-54.8.
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED FROM WOODSTOVE BURNING OF |
|PINE,POPLAR,SWEET GUM AND OAK WOOD. |
|SIZE-RESOLVED SAMPLES (FINE, ONLY) TAKEN |
(USING A DILUTION TUNNEL. XRF AND CARBON |
(OXIDATION ANALYSIS.LESS THAN VALUES ARE <0.1%|
(FUELS PROFILE BASED ON EMISSION WEIGHED |
(AVERAGE OF 41 SAMPLES. |
-------
15-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
NOTES: OC
BE
B
F
NA
KG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
WOOD STOVES -OAK FUEL
NONE
NONE
********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY UT + - UNC X BY WT +- UNC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NR
NR
1.600
1.800
7.700
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
29.200
7.200
NA
NA
47.500
= ORGANIC CARBON :
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
f NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
» - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
0.000
EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 42103
RANKING: 3338
RATING : A
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY UT +- UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
< -
+ -
f -
+
+
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
* -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : VALUES REPORTED ARE EMISSION WEIGHTED VALUES CALCULATED FROM EARLY, MIDDLE
AND LATE STAGE EMISSION PROFILES. REF. 33.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
42103
42103
42103
42103
42103
42103
42103
42103
33 |WOOD ]D. C. STILES, "EVALUATION OF AN S2 SAMPLER
|STOVES |FOR RECEPTOR MODELING OF WOOOSTOVE
[EMISSIONS, " PROCEEDINGS OF THE 76TH ANNUAL
(MEETING, APCA (1983). PAPER 83-54.8.
I
(PROFILES DEVELOPED FROM WOOOSTOVE BURNING OF |
|10% MOISTURE OAK WOOD. |
|SIZE-RESOLVED SAMPLES (FINE, ONLY) TAKEN J
(USING A DILUTION TUNNEL. XRF AND CARBON |
[OXIDATION ANALYSIS.LESS THAN VALUES ARE <0.1%|
(FUELS PROFILE BASED ON EMISSION WEIGHED |
(AVERAGE OF 6 SAMPLES. |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
Nl
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
FIREPLACES
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.606
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
38.000
33.000
NA
NA
71 .606
-SOFTWOODS
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
» - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
< - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 6.000
+ - 13.00
+ - NR
+ NR
PROFILE: 42201
RANKING: 2224
RATING : C
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
NA +
NA * -
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
0.606 + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA «
NA * -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
38.000 + -
33.000 + -
NA +
NA + -
71.606
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
6.000
13.00
NR
NR
TSP
********* <3Q UM
X BY WT +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA «
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
0.606 + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA * -
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
NA +
38.000 +
33.000 + -
NA +
NA + -
71 .606
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
6.000
13.00
NR
NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : EC, OC MEAN AND STD. DEV. VALUES FROM 7 SOURCE TESTS.K VALUES
AVERAGE OF 3 TESTS. PROFILES ALL ASSUMED SIMILAR BASED ON SIZE DISTRIBUTION. REF.
34
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE[SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
42201
42201
42201
42201
42201
42201
42201
42201
42201
34 |FIREPLACE|J. M. DASCH, "PARTICULATE AND GASEOUS
(SOFTWOOD (EMISSIONS FROM WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES,
(AND T , 16:10 (1982).
| AND
(J.L. MAHLBAIER, " A CHARACTERIZATION OF
(EMISSIONS FROM WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES,"
(GENERAL MOTORS RESEARCH LAB REPORT GMR-3730.
|EC AND OC ANALYSIS OF 7 SOFTWOOD AND 14
ES |HARDWOOD TESTS USING METHOD 5 TRAIN. FRONT
(AND BACKHALF FRACTIONS SOFTWOODS. INCLUDED
(PINE, SPRUCE AND CEDAR. POTASSIUM VALUES
|FROM AN AVERAGE OF 3 TESTS BURNING PINE AND
(SPRUCE NO OTHER TRACE ELEMENTS MEASURED.
I
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUNK X )
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
1C
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
FIREPLACES
NONE
NONE
*********
X BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.030
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
46.000
8.000
NA
NA
55.030
HARDWOODS
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
« NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 7.000
+ - 7.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY UT +- UNC
NA + -
NA *
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA *
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA +
1.030 + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA +
NA + -
NA * -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA +
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA + -
NA -f -
NA +
46.000 + -
8.000 + -
NA + -
NA -f
55.030
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
7.000
7.000
NR
NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
42202
2224
C
TSP
*********
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE[SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
42202
42202
42202
42202
42202
42202
42202
42202
42202
34 |FIREPLACE|J. M. OASCH, "PARTICULATE AND GASEOUS
|HARDWOOD |EMISSIONS FROM WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES,"
|AND T , 16:10 (1982).
| AND
|J.L. MAHLBAIER, " A CHARACTERIZATION OF
(EMISSIONS FROM WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES,"
(EC AND OC ANALYSIS OF 14 SOURCE TESTS
ES [BURNING HARDWOODS (MAPLE, OAK, ASH AND
(ELM). SEE PROFILE 42201. POTASSIUM VALUES
(AVERAGE OF 3 RED OAK TESTS. AUTHOR REPORTS
(HIGHER K VALUES IN HARDWOODS THAN
[SOFTWOODS. SYNTHETIC LOGS EMISSIONS
[GENERAL MOTORS RESEARCH LAB REPORT GMR-3730. (REPORTED AS 49+-2X OC AND 15+-5% EC.
[(1981) |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
200
201
202
203
204
206
SUM( % )
SPECIE
NAME
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
TC
OC
EC
S04
N03
NH4
SLASH BURNING
NONE
NONE
X BY WT
0.067
NA
0.455
0.802
<
0.281
0.016
0.442
0.713
<
0.010
<
<
0.080
0.342
<
<
0.001
0.012
<
<
<
<
0.010
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.006
80.604
NA
NA
0.637
1.056
0.708
86.240
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - 0.149
+ - NR
+ 0.298
+ - 0.633
+ - NR
+ - 0.220
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.202
+ 0.962
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.017
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.095
+ - 0.255
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.003
+ 0.012
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.010
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.009
+ - 6.215
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.373
+ 1.248
+ - 0.452
*********
% BY WT
0.067
NA
0.455
0.802
<
0.281
0.016
0.442
0.713
<
0.010
<
<
0.080
0.342
<
<
0.001
0.012
<
<
<
<
0.010
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.006
80.604
NA
NA
0.637
1.056
0.708
86.240
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - 0.149
+ - NR
+ 0.298
+ - 0.633
+ - NR
+ - 0.220
+ 0.041
+ 0.202
+ - 0.962
+ - 0.000
+ - 0.017
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.095
+ 0.255
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.003
« 0.012
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.009
+ - 6.215
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.373
+ - 1.248
+ - 0.452
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
0.067
NA
0.455
0.802
<
0.281
0.016
0.442
0.713
<
0.010
<
<
0.080
0.342
<
<
0.001
0.012
<
<
<
<
0.010
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.006
80.604
NA
NA
0.637
1.056
0.708
86.240
42301
3218
B
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - 0.149
+ - NR
+ 0.298
+ 0.633
+ NR
+ - 0.220
+ - 0.041
+ - 0.202
+ 0.962
+ - 0.000
+ 0.017
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.095
+ - 0.255
+ - NR
+ NR
+ 0.003
+ 0.012
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.010
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.009
+ - 6.215
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.373
+ - 1.248
+ - 0.452
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON TC = TOTAL CARBON NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION OF 8 FINE FRACTION SAMPLES. COMPOSITION OF
ALL SIZE FRACTIONS ASSUMED SIMILAR. REF: OREGON DEPT. ENV. QUALITY
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE I SOURCE |
NUMBER [NUMBER (GROUP f
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
42301 (PERSONAL (SLASH
42301 JCOMM. (BURNING
42301
42301
42301
42301
42301
42301
(PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, STATE OF OREGON
(DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OCT. 7,1933. CAROL
ICUMMINGS.
|MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES OF 8 FINE
(PARTICLE SLASH BURNING SAMPLES OBTAINED
(FROM ER &T AMBIENT SAMPLERS LOCATED IN
(PLUME AT GROUND LEVEL. ANALYZED BY AAS,
(XRF.ION CHROMATOGRAPHY AND CARBON OXIDATION.
(THREE SMOLDER PHASE AND 5 ACTIVE BURN PHASE
(SAMPLES.
I
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
sec*
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
206
SUM( % )
NOTES: OC
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
NH4
SLASH BURNING
5-03-002-01
NONE
FINE
********* <2.5 UM ******
% BY WT + UNC
NA
NA
NA
0.096
NA
0.144
0.132
NA
0.132
0.253
0.620
0.868
NA
NA
<
NA
0.280
0.064
NA
<
<
0.022
NA
<
<
<
0.021
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
<
59.250
9.750
0.328
0.220
72.053
= ORGANIC CARBON :
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.035
+ - NR
+ 0.066
+ - 0.041
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - 0.118
+ - 0.235
+ 0.288
+ - NR
« NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.120
+ - 0.042
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.016
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 10.56
+ - 3.590
+ - 0.089
+ - 0.080
EC = ELEMENTAL
*********
% BY UT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.705
0.930
NA
0.990
0.850
1.250
5.500
NA
0.045
<
0.062
1.450
0.430
NA
<
<
0.052
NA
<
<
<
0.112
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
<
59.000
10.000
0.130
1.000
81.516
CARSON : NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+ UNC
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.205
+ - 0.099
+ NR
+ - 0.438
+ - 1.200
+ 0.212
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
+ - 0.064
+ - NR
+ - 0.025
+ - 0.212
+ - 0.156
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.025
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.067
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 10.00
+ - 3.000
+ - 0.184
+ - 0.560
= NOT ANALYZED :
PROFILE: 42302
RANKING: 21324
RATING : B
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT +- UNC
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
»
+ -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
* -
+ -
+
+ -
+ -
+ -
0.000
NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, OREGON DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
82
201
202
203
204
206
SUM( % )
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
8A
CE
PS
OC
EC
S04
N03
NH4
ORCHARD
NONE
NONE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.035
0.060
NA
0.890
<
<
<
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
0.006
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.059
7.200
83.500
1.800
NA
1.730
92.793
HEATING SMUDGE POTS
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.071
+ - 0.020
f - 0.085
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ NR
* - NR
» - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.044
+ - 3.960
+ - 9.000
+ - 1.131
+ NR
+ - 0.665
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.035
0.060
NA
0.890
<
<
<
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
0.006
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.059
7.200
83.500
1.800
NA
1.730
92.793
PROFILE: 43302
RANKING: 2324
RATING : S
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UH ******
+ UNC X BY WT + UNC
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.071 +
+ - 0.020 +
+ - 0.085 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.100 + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.006 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.044 + -
+ - 3.960 + -
+ - 9.000 < -
+ - 1.131 + -
+ NR + -
+ - 0.665 + -
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER [GROUP |
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
42302 |
42302 |
42302 (
42302 |
42302 |
45 (SLASH IR.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER, "MED FORD AEROSOL
(BURNING (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
I I
(AVERAGE Of FIVE FILTERS COLLECTED FROM TWO
(SLASH BURNS IN OREGON. SAMPLES TAKEN AT
(GROUND LEVEL IN THE PLUME OF A SLASH BURN.
I !
I
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
43
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
8R
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION COMPOSITE
NONE
NONE
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.083
0.073
0.021
<
<
0.182
0.509
0.860
0.067
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.037
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
<
47.500
12.800
0.289
NA
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.017
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
c - 0.019
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.010
+ - MR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
t- NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 13.80
+ - 8.400
+ - 0.021
-t- - NR
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
0.083
0.073
0.021
<
<
0.182
0.509
0.860
0.067
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.037
NA
<
<
<
<
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
<
<
47.500
12.800
0.289
NA
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.012
+ - 0.017
* - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.019
+ - 0.031
+ - 0.010
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 13.80
+ - 8.400
+ - 0.021
+ - NR
PROFILE: 42303
RANKING: 2328
RATING : A
TSP
********* <3Q UH ******
% BY WT +- UNC
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+, .
+ .
+ .
+ .
f -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
SUMC % )
62.239
62.239
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|RE FERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
42303
42303
42303
42303
42303
42303
45 IRESID JR.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER,"MEDFORD AEROSOL
(WOOD (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
(COMBUST. (OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| (GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(COMPOSITE SOURCE PROFILE BASED ON THE MIX OF |
(WOOD BURNED AND TYPE OF COMBUSTION UNIT |
((WOOD STOVE OR FIREPLACE) USED IN MEDFORD, |
(0 IN 1980. AVERAGE OF 16 SAMPLES fROM |
|8 SOURCES. 45% FIREPLACES, 55% WOOD STOVES |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES SPECIES
NUMBER NAME
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
BE
8
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
AGRICULTURAL FIELD BURNING
5-03-002-01
NONE
X BY WT
NA
NA
0.320
0.240
<
0.340
0.300
<
1.500
3.100
5.900
0.400
<
0.005
<
0.005
0.004
0.200
<
<
0.110
<
<
<
<
<
0.030
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.030
35.600
5.800
5.000
0.890
59.774
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - HR
+ - NR
+ - 0.150
+ - 0.340
+ - NR
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.200
+ - NR
+ - 0.700
+ - 2.000
+ - 2.500
+ - 0.300
+ - NR
+ - 0.005
+ - NR
+ - 0.007
+ - 0.005
+ - 0.600
+ - NR
« - NR
+ - 0.400
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.040
+ - 10.75
+ - 1.740
+ - 4.300
+ - 0.900
COARSE
********* 2.5-10UM ******
X BY UT +- UNC
NA * -
NA + -
0.320 + -
0.240 + -
< + -
0.340 + -
0.300 + -
< + -
1.500 + -
3.100 + -
5.900 + -
0.400 +
< *
0.005 + -
< + -
0.005 + -
0.004 + -
0.200 + -
< + -
< + -
0.110 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.030 + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< -i- -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
< + -
0.030 + -
35.600 + -
5.800 * -
5.000 + -
0.890 + -
59.774
NR
NR
0.150
0.340
NR
0.300
0.200
NR
0.700
2.000
2.500
0.300
NR
0.005
NR
0.007
0.005
0.600
NR
NR
0.400
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.040
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.040
10.75
1.740
4.300
0.900
PROFILE: 42304
RANKING: 2321
RATING : C
TSP
********* <3Q UM ******
X BY WT + UNC
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
« -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ -
+ -
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
4- -
4- -
+ -
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ .
+ -
0.000
NA = NOT ANALYZED
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES :REF. 46.FIELD BURNING OF GRASS SEED STUBBLE.
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROF ILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
42304 | 46 IAGRICUL- | J.G.WATSON, "CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
42304 | ITURAL (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
42304 (GRASS (FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PART1CULATE MATTER
42304 (BURNING |IN PORTLAND, OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
42304
(GRADUATE CENTER(1979)
| AND
IJITENORA j. SHAH, "MEASUREMENTS OF
(AVERAGE OF TEM SAMPLES COLLECTED BY OPEN
(BURNING OF AGRICULTURAL GRASS SEED STUBBLE.
(AIRCRAFT PLUME SAMPLES.
1 1
1
1
(PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(CARBONACEOUS AEROSOL ACROSS THE U.S.: SOURCES (WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
(AND ROLE IN VISIBILITY DEGREDATION,"PHD
(THESIS, OREGON GRADUATE CENTER. MAY, 1981.
(TABLE A. 2.
1
1
1
1
1
i
((2.0 UM 050) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
(UM.D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INN A, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATION (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, OC, EC TENDS TO 8E UNDERESTIMATED.
(ORIGIONAL PACS OC,EC DATA REVISED BY SHAW.
1
1
-------
21-Jun-a5
SOURCE LIBRARY
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % >
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
HI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CO
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
HG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
MARINE AEROSOL
NONE
NOT APPLICABLE
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
40.000
4.800
NA
NA
NA
3.300
40.000
1.400
1.400
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.200
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
NA
NA
10.000
NA
97.800
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 4.000
+ - 0.900
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.300
+ 10.00
* - 0.200
+ - 0.200
t- - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.050
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 4.000
+ - NR
*********
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
40.000
4.800
NA
NA
NA
3.300
40.000
1.400
1.400
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.200
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
NA
NA
10.000
NA
97.800
COARSE
2.5-10UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ 4.000
+ - 0.900
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 1.300
+ - 10.00
+ 0.200
+ - 0.200
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.050
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 4.000
+ - NR
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
43101
1111
C
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
« - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR =
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : * LITERATURE COMPOSITE, REF. 46
NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE(REFERENCE(SOURCE |
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP j
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
I
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
43101
46 (MARINE (J.G.WATSON,"CHEMICAL ELEMENT BALANCE
(AIR (RECEPTOR MODEL METHODOLOGY FOR SOURCES OF
(FINE AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
(IN PORTLAND,OREGON," PHD THESIS. OREGON
(GRADUATE CENTERC1979)
(ESTIMATE OF MARINE AEROSOL COMPOSITION.
(ASSUMES A CL TO NA RATIO OF ONE AND THAT ALL
(CONSTITUENTS, ASIDE FROM CL, RETAIN THEIR
(BASIC BULK SEA WATER RATIOS. THE ABSOLUTE
(VALUES WERE ESTABLISHED BY NORMALIZING ALL
(VALUES TO 100%.
I
[PROFILES DEVELOPED DURING THE PACS STUDY
(WERE TAKEN WITH A 2 STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR
((2.0 UM D50) WITH A METHOD 5 HEATED PROBE.
(NO DILUTION AIR. UPPER CUT POINT ABOUT 20
(UM.D50. ANALYSIS BY XRF AND INNA, 1C AND
(CARBON OXIDATION (CORRECTED FOR ARTIFACT EC).
(SINCE NO DILUTION AIR WAS USED DURING
(SAMPLING, THE PACS PROFILES TEND TO
(UNDERESTIMATE ORGANIC CARBON.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARr
SOURCE: RESIDENTIAL SPACE HEATING-COAL PROFILE: 43201
SCC: NONE RANKING: 1121
CONTROLS: NONE RATING : D
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
- 58
80
82
201
202
203
204
FINE
SPECIES ********* <2.5 UM ******
NAME % BY WT + - UNC
BE + -
B *
f + -
NA + -
MG + -
AL +
SI + -
P + -
S + -
CL + -
K +
CA +
SC +
TI +
V + -
CR + -
MN +
FE + -
CO +
NI + -
CU +
ZN + -
GA +
GE + -
AS + -
SE + -
BR +
RB + -
SR +
ZR +
AG + -
CD + -
SN + -
SB + -
CS + -
BA + -
CE + -
HG * -
PB + -
OC * -
EC + -
S04 + -
N03 + -
COARSE TSP
********* 2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3o UM
X BY UT +- UNC % BY WT +
+ - NA + -
t- - 0.120 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ 0.540 + -
+ - 1.275 + -
+ - 1.275 * -
+ - 0.105 -f -
+ - NR +
+ < + -
+ - < +
+ - 2.100 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.075 + -
+ - 0.030 + -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ - 1.650 * -
+ - 0.007 + -
+ - 0.090 + -
+ - 0.060 + -
+ - 0.300 + -
+ - < + -
f - < + -
+ - 0.030 + -
+ < + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.030 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.900 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.105 + -
+ - 0.405 + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.105 + -
+ - < + -
+ - < + -
+ - 0.015 + -
+ 40.000 + -
+ - 40.000 + -
+ - NA + -
+ - NA +
******
UNC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
SUM(
0.000
0.000
89.238
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : AVERAGE OF TWO TESTS. WARM AIR FURNACE BURNING HIGH-ASH BITUMINOUS COAL
REF. 51.
-------
13-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE[SOURCE | REFERENCE | REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER |NUMBER (GROUP | |
43201 | 51 (RESIDENT.|T.W. HUGHES AND D. DeANGELES,"EMISSIONS FROM (AVERAGE OF TWO TESTS OF A 200K BTU
43201 | (HEATING- (COAL-FIRED RESIDENTIAL COMBUSTION (COAL-FIRED WARM AIR FURNACE BURNING
43201 | (COAL (EQUIPMENT,"PROCEEDINGS, 1981 CONFERENCE ON (BITUMINOUS COAL (9.1% ASH, 37.5%
43201 | | (RESID. SOLID FUELS. OREGON GRADUATE CENTER |VOLATILES,I.S% s). ICAP AND AAS ANALYSIS OF
43201 | | ((1981) (METHOD 5 SAMPLES. ORIGIONAL DATA IN LB/TON.
43201 | | | (CARBON DATA APPROXIMATE.
43201 ||l |
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
1
SPECIES
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( X )
SOURCE:
SCC:
CONTROLS:
SPECIES
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
8R
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
KG
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
VOLCANIC A
NONE
NONE
X BY WT
NA
NA
NA
3.400
0.800
8.600
32.000
<
0.040
0.060
1.400
2.860
<
0.330
0.010
<
0.050
2.490
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.040
<
<
<
NA
NA
NA
NA
52.080
SH
FINE
+ UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - 0.100
* - 0.020
+ - 0.200
+ - 1.000
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.080
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - 0.070
+ NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
3.400
0.800
8.600
32.000
<
0.040
0.060
1.400
2.860
<
0.330
0.010
<
0.050
2.490
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.040
<
«
<
NA
NA
NA
NA
52.080
PROFILE: 43301
RANKING: 3321
RATING : C
COARSE TSP
2 m 5 1 OUM ****** ********* <30 UM ******
+ UNC % BY WT + UNC
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.100 * -
+ - 0.020 + -
+ 0.200 -
+ - 1.000 + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.020 +
+ - 0.040 + -
« - 0.080 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.070 +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR < -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
<
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NA = NOT ANALYZED :
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT
OTHER NOTES : MT. ST. HELENS ASH FROM LEWISTON,IDAHO. REF. 42.
NR = NOT REPORTED
-------
21-Jun-85 SOURCE LIBRARY
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE j REFERENCE (REFERENCE ABSTRACT
NUMBER [NUMBER |GROUP | |
43301 | 42 (VOLCANIC |J.A. COOPER,"LEWISTON, IDAHO AEROSOL STUDY" IRESUSPENDED MT. ST. HELENS ASH COLLECTED IN
43301 | |ASH (UNPUBLISHED JLEWISTON, IDAHO.
43301 ||| I
-------
21-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
s
s
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
82
201
202
203
204
206
SUM< X )
iOURCE:
iCC:
!ONTROLS:
SPECIE
NAME
BE
B
F
NA
MG
AL
SI
P
S
CL
K
CA
SC
TI
V
CR
MN
FE
CO
NI
CU
ZN
GA
GE
AS
SE
BR
RB
SR
ZR
AG
CD
SN
SB
CS
BA
CE
PB
OC
EC
S04
N03
NH4
ORCHARD
NONE
NONE
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.035
0.060
NA
0.890
<
<
<
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
0.006
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.059
7.200
83.500
1.800
NA
1.730
92.793
HEATING - SMUDGE P(
FINE
<2.5 UM ******
+ - UNC
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.071
+ - 0.020
+ - 0.085
+ - NR
+ - 0.100
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.006
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.044
+ - 3.960
+ - 9.000
+ - 1.131
+ - NR
+ 0.665
3TS
*********
% BY WT
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.120
0.035
0.060
NA
0.890
<
<
<
NA
<
<
<
<
<
NA
<
<
0.013
<
<
<
<
0.006
NA
<
NA
NA
<
NA
<
NA
<
<
0.059
7.200
83.500
1.800
NA
1.730
92.793
PROFILE: 43302
RANKING: 2324
RATING : B
COARSE TSP
2.5-10UM ****** ********* <3Q UM ******
+- UNC X BY UT +- UNC
+ NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - 0.071 +
+ - 0.020
+ 0.085 + -
+ NR +
+ - 0.100 + -
+ - NR +
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR +
* - NR + -
+ NR +
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR +
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.006 + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ - NR + -
* - NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ NR + -
+ - NR + -
+ -" NR + -
+ 0.044 + -
+ - 3.960 + -
+ - 9.000 + -
+ - 1.131 + -
+ - NR + -
+ 0.665 + -
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : REF. 45.
NOT REPORTED
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE|REFERENCE|SOURCE
NUMBER (NUMBER (GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
43302
43302
43302
43302
43302
45 |SMUDGE (R.T.DECESAR AND JA COOPER,"MEDFORD AEROSOL
|POTS (CHARACTERIZATION STUDY," REPORT TO THE
| |OREGON DEPT. ENVIRON. QUALITY. OREGON
| |GRADUATE CENTER (1980)
(AVERAGE OF TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED WITH A
ITWO-STAGE VIRTUAL IMPACTOR.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY
c
«
c
SPECIE
NUMBER
4
5
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
37
38
40
47
48
50
51
55
56
58
80
82
201
202
203
204
SUM( % )
SOURCE: COAL-FIRED POWER UTILITY FLYASH (SRM 1633)
iCC: 1-01-001-01
X5NTROLS: ESP CATCH
FINE COARSE
SPECIE ********* <2.5 UM ****** ********* 2.5-10UM ******
NAME X BY WT + - UNC X BY WT + UNC
BE + + -
B + - +
F + - +
NA + + -
MG * - +
AL + + -
SI + - + -
p + - + -
S + - + -
CL + - + -
K + - + -
CA + - +
SC + + -
TI + - +
V + - + -
CR - - +
MN + - + -
FE + - +
CO + +
NI + + -
CU * +
2N + + -
GA + + -
GE + +
AS + - -f -
SE + - + -
BR + + -
RB + - + -
SR + - + -
ZR + + -
AG + + -
CD + - + -
SN + - +
SB + - + -
CS + + -
BA + - + -
CE + - + -
HG + - +
PB ( + -
OC + - + -
EC + - + -
S04 + - + -
N03 + +
0.000 0.000
PROFILE:
RANKING:
RATING :
*********
X BY WT
<
<
<
0.340
1.500
13.200
21.000
<
<
0.004
1.600
4.200
0.002
0.730
0.025
0.013
0.051
6.200
0.004
0.009
<
0.022
<
<
0.006
0.001
<
0.013
<
0.030
<
<
<
0.001
0.001
0.270
0.015
<
0.007
NA
NA
NA
NA
49.244
43303
2338
A
TSP
<30 UM ******
+- UNC
+ - NR
+ - NR
* - NR
+ - 0.200
f - 0.160
* - 0.500
+ - 2.000
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.080
* - 0.400
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.040
+ - 0.003
+ 0.001
+ 0.001
+ - 0.300
+ - 0.001
+ 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.002
+ NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ NR
* - NR
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - 0.001
+ 0.020
+ - " 0.001
+ - NR
+ - 0.001
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
+ - NR
NOTES: OC = ORGANIC CARBON : EC = ELEMENTAL CARBON : NR = NOT REPORTED
< = LESS THAN DETECTION LIMIT : NA = NOT ANALYZED
OTHER NOTES : U. OF MARYLAND INAA ANALYSIS. SRM 1633 IS
REF: 9 A BLEND OF FLAYASH COLLECTED BY CONTROL SYSTEMS.
-------
13-Jun-85
SOURCE LIBRARY ABSTRACT
PROFILE[REFERENCE[SOURCE
NUMBER [NUMBER [GROUP
REFERENCE
REFERENCE ABSTRACT
43303
43303
43303
43303
43303
9 [COAL | S.S. RAY AND F.G. PARKER," CHARACTERIZATION [UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND INNA ANALYSIS OF SRM
IFLYASH [OF ASH FROM COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS"U.S. EPA |1633 COAL FLYASH BLEND TAKEN FROM SEVERAL
| [#600/7-77-010 (1977). (POWER PLANTS CONTROL SYSTEMS. NOT
| | [REPRESENTATIVE OF STACK EMISSIONS.
-------
Appendix A
References
A-l
-------
REFERENCES
1. J.A. Cooper and J. G. Watson, "Receptor-oriented Methods of Air
Particulate Source Apportionment," Journal of the Air Pollution Control
Association 30:10, 1116-1125, (1980).
2. G. E. Gordon, "Receptor Models," Environmental Science and Technology, 14,
792-800, (1980).
3. U.S. EPA, "Technical Considerations in Source Apportionment by Particle
Identification," EPA-450/4/83-Ol6d, (1983).
4. U.S. EPA, "Digest of Ambient Particulate Analysis and Assessment Methods,"
EPA-450/3-78-113, (1978).
5. G. E. Gordon, ₯.H. Zoller, G.S. Kowalczyk and S. V. Rheingrover,
"Composition of Source Components Needed for Aerosol Receptor Models,"
Atmospheric Aerosol Source/Air Quality Relationships. ACS Symposium
Serios 167, E. Macias and P. Hopke eds. (1980)
6. J. G. Watson, Jr. "Chemical Element Balance Receptor Model Methodology For
Assessing the Sources of Fine and Total Suspended Particulate in Portland,
Oregon," Doctorial dissertation for the Oregon Graduate Center, February,
1979.
7. B. A. Roscie, D. K. Hopke, S. L. Dattner and J. M. Jenks, "The Use of
Principal Component Factor Analysis to Interpret Particulate Compositional
Data Sets," Journal Air Pollution Control Assoc., 32:6 (1982).
8. J. E. Core, "Receptor Model Technical Series Volume II; Chemical Mass
BaJance," EPA 450/4-81-016b, (1981).
9. S. S. Ray and F. G. Parker, "Characterization of Ash from Coal-Fired Power
Plants," U.S. EPA #600/7-77-010 (1977).
10. H. J. Taback, A. R. Brienza, J. F. Macko and N. Brunetz, "Fine Particle
Emissions from Stationary and Miscellaneous Sources in the South Coast Air
Basin," KVB Corp. No. 5806-783 (1979), NTIS #PB293923-
11. R. E. Lee, Hilcrist, A. E. Riley and K. E. MacLeod, "Concentration and
Size of Trace Metal Emissions from a Power Plant, a Steel Plant and a
Cotton Gin," Environmental Science and Technology, 9:643-747, July, 1975-
12. W. S. Lyons, "Trace Element Measurements at Coal-Fired Steam Plants," CRC
Press, Cleveland, Ohio (Table 8.8) University of Maryland analysis.
13. W.S. Lyons, "Trace Element Measurement at Coal-Fired Steam Plants," CRC
Press, Cleveland, Ohio (Table 10.4).
14. S. L. Heisler, "Source Breakdown of the St. Louis Aerosol by the Method of
Chemical and Material Balance," Report to U.S. EPA Grant R802160-03-0,
(1975), Table 2.
-------
15. G. S. Kowalczyk, C. E. Choquette and G. E. Gordon, "Chemical Element
Balance Identification of Air Pollution Sources in Washington, D.C.,"
Atmospheric Environment 12:1143 (1978).
16. N. E. Bolton, et. al. , "Trace Element Mass Balance Around a Coal-Fired
Steam Plant," Trace Elements in Fuels, S. Babu, Ed. pp. 180,182, (1975)
17. Controlling Airborne Particles, National Academy of Sciences, (1979).
18. M. S. Germani, M. Small, W. Zoller and J. Moyers, "Fractionation of
Elements During Copper Smelting," Environmental Science and Technology,
15-3 (1981) Table V.
19- J.A. Cooper and C.A. Frasier, "Preliminary Source Apportionment of Winter
Particulate Mass in Juneau, Alaska," Report prepared for the State of
Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation by NEA, Inc. (1983)
20. U.S. EPA, "Engine-Related Particulate MatterA Compilation of 180
References," unpublished, provided by F. Black, USEPA, ESRL, U.S. EPA,
ESRL, RTP, NC, (1981) Table 2-16.
21. J. E. Core, "Willamette Valley Field and Slash Burning Impact Air Quality
Surveillance Program Volume 3," State of Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (1979).
22. Glen R. Cass and Gregory McRae, "Source-Receptor Reconcilliation of South
Coast Air Basin Particulate Air Quality Data-Draft," Prepared for
California Air Resource Board (1981).
23- J. E. Howes, W. M. Henry and R. N. Pesut, "Evaluation of Stationary Source
Particulate Measurements Methods-Volume V, Secondary Lead Smelters," U.S.
EPA 600/2-79-116 (1979), Tables 5 and 6.
24. K. Schwitzgebel, R. Coleman, R. Collins, R. Mann and C. Thompson, "Trace
Element Study at a Primary Copper Smelter," U.S. EPA #600/2-78-0654
(1978).
25. H. E. Dietzmnann, M. A. Parness and R. L. Bradow, "Emissions from Gasoline
and Diesel Delivery Trucks by Chassis Transient Cycle," ASME 81-DGP-6
(1981).
26. J. E. Core, J. A. Cooper and R. T. DeCesar, "Iowa Source Apportionment
Study," Report prepared for U.S. EPA Region VII by NEA, Inc. (1982).
27. J. E. Core, et. al., "A Study of Residential Wood Combustion Task 1 -
Ambient Air Quality Impact Analysis," Report prepared for U.S. EPA Region
X by NEA, Inc. (1982).
28. J. A. Cooper, "Missoula Montana Source Apportionment Study," Final Report
to the State of Montana Department of Health, NEA, Inc. (1980).
29. R. R. Greenburg, W. H. Zoller and G. E. Gordon, "Composition and Size
Distribution of Particles Released from Refuse Incineration,"
Environmental Science and Technology 12:566 (1978).
-------
30. S. K. Friedlander, "Chemical Element Balances and Identification of Air
Pollution Sources," Environmental Science and Technology 7:3, March 1973-
31. J. T. Leach, G. Bates and L. Stanfield, "San Joaquin Valley Particulate
Matter Study," unpublished (1979).
32. J. E. Core, J. A. Cooper, R. T. DeCesar and J. E. Houch, "South Bend,
Indiana Aerosol Study," NEA, Inc., unpublished (1981).
33- I". C. Stiles, "Evaluation of an S2 Sampler for Receptor Modeling of
Voodstove Emissions," Proceeding of the 76th Annual Meeting, APCA (1983).
34. J. M. Dasch, "Particulate and Gaseous Emissions from Voodburning
Fireplaces," ES & T 16:10 (1982).
35- J. L. Muhlbaier, "A Characterization of Emissions from Vood-burning
Fireplaces," General Motors Research Laboratory. GMR-3730 (1981).
36. J. L. Muhlbaier and R. Williams, "Fireplaces, Furnaces and Vehicles as
Emission Sources of Particulate Carbon," General Motors Research
Laboratory Report. GMR-3462 (1980).
37. R. R. Greenberg, G. E. Gordon and W. H. Zoller, "Composition of Particles
Emitted from the Nicosia Municipal Incinerator," Environmental Science and
Technology 12:11 (1978).
38*. L.O. Edwards, et. al., "Trace Metals and Stationery Conventional
Combustion Processes," EPA 600/7-80-155 (1981).
39. J. M. Ondov, et. al., "Elemental Emissions from a Coal-Fired Power Plant.
Comparison of a Venturi Vest Scrubber System with a Cold-sale
Electrostatic Precipitator," Environmental Science and Technology 13:5
(1979).
40. R. K. Stevens, et. al., "Mathematical and Empirical Receptor Models: Quail
Roose II," U.S. EPA ORD ESRL, Research Triangle Park, NC (1983).
41. W. R. Pierson and W. D. Brachaczek, "Particulate Matter Associated with
Vehicles on the Road II," Aerosol Science and Technology 2:1 (1983).
42. J. A. Cooper, "Potlack Corporation Aerosol Characterization Study", Final
Report to the Potlack Corporation, Unpublished, Sept. 1979.
43-
-------
46. J. G. Watson, "Chemical Element Balance Receptor Model Methodology for
Sources of Fine and Total Suspended Particulate Matter in Portland,
Oregon," Ph.D. Thesis. Oregon Graduate Center. February 1979-
47. Tetsuo Mamuro, Arika Mizohata and Torahide Kubota, "Elemental Compositions
of Suspended Particles Released from Iron and Steel ₯orks," Annual Report
of the Radiation Center of Osaka Prefecture - Volume 20, (1979).
48. J. A. Cooper, et. al., "Determination of Source Contributions to Fine and
Coarse Suspended Particulate Levels in Petersville, Alabama," Report to
Tennesse Valley Authority by NBA, Inc. (1981).
49- J. A. Copper, C. A. Frazier and J. E. Houch, "Seattle-Tacoma Aerosol
Characterization Study (STAGS)," Draft Final Report to the Puget Sound Air
Pollution Control Agency by NEA, Inc. (1983).
50. Tetsuo Mamuro and Akira Mizohata, "Elemental Compositioning of Suspended
Particles Released in Refuse Incineration," Annual Report of the Radiation
Center of Osaka Prefecture, Volume 19, (1978).
51. T. ₯. Hughes and D. DeAngelis, "Emissions from Coal-Fired Residential
Combustion Equipment," Proceedings of the 1981 International Conference on
Residential Solid Fuels, J. Cooper and D. Maleik, Eds., Oregon Graduate
Center, (1981).
52. J. E. Howes, J. A. Cooper and J. E. Houch, "Sampling and Analysis to
Determine Source Signatures in the Philadelphia Area," Draft Final Report
to U.S. EPA Environ. Science Research Laboratory, RTP, N.C. NEA, Inc.,
(1983).
53. W.R. Pierson and V. W. Brachaczek, Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 47>
1275-1299.
54. J.J. Shah, "Measurements of Carbonaceous Aerosols Across the U.S.:
Sources and Role in Visibility Degradation," Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon Graduate
Center, (1981).
55- R.C. Henry, "Stability Analysis of Receptor Models that Use Least Squares
Fitting," Proceedings, Receptor Model Applied to Contemporary Pollution
Problems. Air Pollution Control Association, (October, 1982).
56. A.C. Sckarlat and S. Japar, "Optical and Chemical Properties of particle
Emissions from On-Road Vehicles," Journal Air Pollution Control
Association, 33:6 (1983).
57. J.G. Watson and N.F. Robinson, "Error Analysis of Mass Balance and
Particle Scattering Budget Models for RESOLVE," Desert Research Institute,
Reno, NV, (1984).
-------
Appendix B
Additional Literature
B-l
-------
Appendix B
Additional Source Composition Literature
Air Conditioners;
Buchnea, D. & Buchnea, A. (1974) "Air Pollution by Aluminum Compounds
Resulting Prom Corrosion of Air Conditioners". ES&T, 8, 752.
Animal Feed and Wastes;
Capar, S.G., Tanner, J.T., Friedman, M.H. and Boyer, K.W. (1978) "Multielement
Analysis of Animal Feed, Animal Wastes, and Sewage Sludge". ES&T, 12, 785.
Agricultural Burning;
Core, J.E. and Terraglio, F.P. (1978) "Field and Slash Burning Particulate
Characterization: The Search for Unique Natural Tracers". Annual Meeting of
Pacific Northwest International Section of APCA, Portland, Oregon.
Shum, Y.S. and Loveland, W.D. (1974) "Atmospheric Trace Element Concentrations
Associated with Agricultural Field Burning in the Willamette Valley of
Oregon", Atmospheric Environment, 8_, 645.
Auto Exhaust:
Ganley, J.T. and Springer, G.S. (1974) "Physical and Chemical Characteristics
of Particulates in Spark Ingition Engine Exhaust". ES&T, 8_, 340.
Gillette, D.A. and Winchester, J.W. (1972) A Study of Aging of Lead
AerosolsI". Atmospheric Environment, 6_, 443«
Gillette, D.A. (1972) "A Study of Aging of Lead AerosolsII". A Numerical
Model Simulating Coagulation and Sedmentation of a Leaded Aerosol in the
Presence of an Unleaded Background Aerosol". Atmospheric Environment, 6_, 451.
Habibi, K. (1973) "Characterization of Particulate Matter in Vehicle
Exhausts". ES&T, 7., 223-
Harrison, R.M. and Sturges, W.T. (1983) "The Measurement and Interpretation of
Br./Pb Ratios in Airborne Particles". Atmospheric Environment, 17, 311
Hasanen, E. et al. "Benzene, Toluene and Xylene Concentrations in Car
Exhausts and in City Air". Atmospheric Environment, 15, 1755.
Hirschler, D.A. and Gilbert, L.F. (1964) "Nature of Lead in Automobile
Exhaust". Archives of Environmental Health, 8_, 297.
Hirschler, D.A. et al. -(1.957) "Particulate Lead Compounds in Automobile
Exhaust Gas". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 49,1131
Holiday, E.P. and Parkinson, M.C. (1978). "Another Look at the Effects of
Manganese Fuel Additive (MMT) on Automobile Emission". APCA Meeting, Houston.
-------
Larsen, R.I. (1966) "Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles". Annals of the New
York Academy of Sciences, 136, 275
McKee, H.C. (1970) "Discussion: Characterization of Particulate Lead in
Vehicle Exhaust: Experimental Techniques". ES&T, £, 253
McKee J.C. and McMahan, ₯.A. (i960) "Automobile Exhaust Particulates - Source
and Variation". JAPCA, _K), 456.
Moran, J.B. et al. (1972) "Effect of Fuel Additives on the Chemocal and
Physical Characteristics of Particulate Emissions in Automotive Exhaust". U.S.
EPA, Report EPA-R2-72-066.
Nielsen, T. (1979) "Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Automobile Exhaust by Means of High-Performance Liquid Chromotography with
Fluorescence Detection". Journal of Chromotography, 170, 147.
Ninomeya, J.S. et al. "Automotive Particulate Emissions". Second International
Clean Air Conference, p. 663.
Ondov, J.M. et al. (1982) "Trace Element Emmisions on Aerosols". ES&T, 16,
318.
Pierson, W.R. et al. (1978) "Methylcyclopentadionyl Manganese Tricarbonyl
Effect on Manganese Emissions from Vehicles on the Road". JAPCA, 28.
Sampson, K.E. and Springer, G.S. (1973) "Effects of Exhaust Gas Temperature
and Fuel Composition on Particulate Emissions from Spark Ignition Engines".
ES&T, 1_, 55-
Ter Haar, G.L. and Boyard, M.A. (1971) "Composition of Airborne Lead
Particles" Nature, 232, 553.
Ter Haar, G.L. et al. (1972) "Composition, Size and Control of Automotive
Exhaust Particulates". JAPCA, 22, 39-
Von Lehmden, D.J. et al. (1974) "Determination of Trace Elements in Coal, Fly
Ash, Fuel Oil and GasolineA Preliminary Comparison of Selected Analytical
Techniques". Analytical Chemistry, 46, 239-
Wilson W.E. et al (1973) ""The Effect of Fuel Composition on Atmospheric
Aerosol Due to Auto Exhaust". JAPCA, 23, 949-
Carbon Black;
Serth, R.W. and Hughes, T.W. (1980) "Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) and Trace
Element Contents of Carbon Black Vent Gas". ES&T, 14, 298.
Cement Production;
Cooper, J.A. et al. (1976) "Analysis of Portland Cement, Clinker, Raw Mix, and
Associated Ceramic Materials Using an Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Analyzer with Inter Element Correction". Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. JJ9
Dubuque, Iowa, Kindall/Hunt Publishing Co.
-------
Coal-Fired Boilers;
Bennett, R.L. and Knapp. K.T. (1978) "Sulfar and Trace Metal Emissions Prom
Combustion Sources". April 24-26, Southern Pines, N.C. Workshop on
Measurement Techology and Characterization of Primary Sulfur Oxides Emission
from Combustion Sources.
Block, Chantal and Dams, R. (1976) "Study of Ply Ash Emission During
Combustion of Coal". ES&T, 10, 1011.
Coles, D.G. et al. (1979) "Chemical Studies of Stack Ply Ash from a
Coal-Fired Power Plant" Environmental Research and Technology, 1_3, 455.
Conway, R.P. (1980) Chemical and Physical Characterization of Sulfates
Associated with Coal Ply Ash, Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University,
Ft. Collins, CO.
Fisher, G.L. et al. (1978) "Physical and Morphological Studies of
Size-Classified Coal Fly Ash". ES&T, _T2, 447.
German!, M.S. (1980) Selected Studies of Four High Temperature Air Pollution
Sources Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Gladney, E.S-. et al. (1976) "Composition and Size Distribution of In-Stack
Particulate Material at a Coal-Fired Power Plant". Atmospheric Environment,
_^0, 1071.
Homolya, J.B. and Cheney, J.L. (1978) "An Assessment of Sulfuric Acid and
Sulfate Emissions from the Combustion Fossil Fuels". Workshop Proceedings on
Primary Sulfate Emissions from Combustion Sources Volume 2, Characterizations.
EPA Publication 600/9-78-036.
Klein, U.H. et al. (1975) "Pathways of Thirty-Seven Trace Elements Through a
Coal-Fired Power Plant". ES&T, 9., 973.
Nadkarni, R.A. (1975) "Multielement Analysis of Coal and Coal Ply Ash
Standards by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis". Radiochemical and
Radioanalysis Letters, 21 , 161.
Ondov, J.M. et al. (1981) "Elemental Composition of Atmospheric Fine Particles
Emitted from Coal Burned in a Modern Electric Power Plant Equipped with a Flue
Gas Desulfurization System". Atmospheric Aerosol, Source/Air Quality
Relationships, edited by E.S. Macios and P.K. Hopke, American Chemical
Society Symposium Series 167, Washington, D.C.
Richards, L.W. (1981) "The Chemistry Aerosol Physics, and Optical Properties
of a Western Coal-Fired Power Plant Plume". Atmospheric Environment, 15, 2111.
Small, J.A. (1976) An Elemental and Morphological Characterization of the
Emissions from the Diekerson and Chalk Point Goal-Fired Power Plants Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Small, M. (1979) Composition of Particulate Trace Elements in Plumes from
Industrial Sources Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park,
MD.
-------
Smith, R.D. et al. (1979) "Concentration Dependence Upon Particle Size of
Volatized Elements in Ply Ash". ES&T, J_3, 553-
Surprenant, N.F. (1981) "Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary
Combustion Systems: Volume IV: Industrial Combustion Sources".
EPA-600/7-81-003c, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Taylor, D.D. and Flanagan, R.C. (1980) "Aerosols from a Laboratory Pulverized
Coal Combustor". Atmospheric Aerosol; Source Library/Air Quality
Relationships, edited by E.S. Kacias and P.K. Hopke, American Chemical Society
Symposium Series, No. 167, Washington, B.C.
Ulrich, G.D. (1976) "An Investigation of the Mechanism of Ply-Ash Formulation
in Coal-Fired Utility Boilers". U.S.-ERDA Report PE-2205-1.
Coke Ovens
Barrett, R.E. et al. (1977) "Sampling and Analysis of Coke Oven Door
Emissions". EPA-600/2-77-213, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Copper Smelters
Germani, M.S. (1980) Selected Studies of Four High Temperature Air Pollution
Sources Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Small, M. (1979) Composition of Particulate Trace Elements in Plumes from
Industrial Sources Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park,
MD.
Zoller, W.H. et al. (1978) "Atmospheric Trace Elements Emissions from Copper
Smelters". Presented at Division of Environmental Chemistry, American
Chemical Society, Miami, Fla.
Cotton Gin
Lee, R.E. (1975) "Concentration and Size of Trace Metal Emissions from a
Power Plant, a Steel Plant, and a Cotton Gin". ES&T, 9_, 643-
Diesel Exhaust;
Prey, J.V. and Corn M. (1967) "Physical and Chemical Characteristics of
Particulates in a Diesel Exhaust". American Industrial Hygiene Association
Journal, 28, 468.
Schreck, R.M. et al. (1978) "Characterization of Diesel Exhaust Particulate
for Mutagenic Testing". APCA Meeting, Houston.
Yergey, J.A. (1981) Chemical Characterization of Organic Adsorbates on Diesel
Particulate Matter, Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
NTIS (1982) "Diesel Exhaust Emissions. 1974-May, 1982". (Citations from the
American Petroleum Institute Data Base).
-------
Jet Aircraft Exhaust;
Fordyce, J.S. and Shebley (1975) "Estimate of Contribution of Jet Aircraft
Operations to Trace Element Concentrations at or Near Airports". JAPCA, 25,
721.
Mamuro, T. et al. (1973) "Activation Analysis of Particulates Emitted from
Aircraft Jet Engines". Annual Report of the Radiation Center of Osaka
Prefecture, 14, 7-
Kraft Paper Mills;
Augustine, E. (1973) Airborne Sampling of Particles Emitted to Jhe Atmosphere
from Kraft Paper Mill Processors and Their Characterization by Electron
Microscopy (Corvallis, OR;OSU Air Resources Center.)
Keith, L. (1976) "Identification of Organic Compounds in Unbleached Treated
Kraft Paper Mill Wastewaters". ES&T, 6_, 555.
Nitrogen Containing Fuels:
Dubay, G.R. and Kites, R.A. (1978) "Cyano-arenes Produced by Combustion of Nitrogen
Containing Fuel". ES&T, 12, 965.
Oil-Fired Boilers:
Bennet, R.L. and Knapp, K.T. (1978) "Sulfur and Trace Metal Emissions from Combustion
Sources". April 24-26, Southern Pines, NC Workshop on Measurement Technology and
Characterization of Primary Sulfur Oxides Emission from combustion Sources.
Dietz, R.N. et al. (1978) "Operating Parameters Affecting Sulfate Emissions from
an Oil-Fired Power Unit". Workshop Proceedings on Primary Sulfate Emissions from
Combustion Sources, Volume 2 Characterization (EPA Publication, 500/9-78-0206).
Homolya, J.B. and Cheney, J.L. (1978) "An Assessment of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfate
Emissions from the Combustion of Fossils Fuels". Workshop Proceedings on Primary
Sulfate Emissions from Combustion Sources, Volumes 2 Characterization (EPA Pub-
lication, 500/9-78-0206).
Mroz, E.J. (1976) The Study of the Elemental Composition of Particulate Emissions
From an Oil-Fired Power Plant Ph.D. Thesis (University of Maryland, College Park. MD)
Mamuro, T. (1979) "Elemental Compositions of Suspended Particles Released from
Various Boilers". Annual Report of the Radiation Center of Osaka Prefecture,
20_, 20.
Van Lehmden, D.J. et al. (1974) "Determination of Trace Elements in Coal, Fly Ash,
Fuel Oils and GasolineA Preliminary Comparison of Selected Analytical Techniques".
Analytical Chemistry, 46, 239.
Zoller, W.M. et al. (1973) "The Sources and Distributions of Vanadium in the At-
mosphere". Trace Elements in the Environment Ed. E.L. Kothny (Washington, D.C.:
American Chemical Society).
-------
Paste Plants:
Bjorseth A. and Lunde G. (1977) "Analysis of the Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Content of Airborne Particulate Pollutants in a Soderberg Paste Plant". American
industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 38, 224.
Petroleum Pitch:
Grienke, R.A. and Lewis, I.C. (1975) "Development of a Gas Chromotographic
Ultraviolet Absorption Spectrometric Method of Monitoring Petroleum Pitch
Volatiles in the Environment". Analy t i cal Chemistry, 47, 2151.
Refuse Combustion;
Campbell, W.J. et al. (1977) "Determination of Trace and Minor Elements in the
Combustible Fraction of Urban Refuse". Methods and Standards for Environmental
Measurement, (NBS Special Publication 264: Washington, D.C.) p. 157.
Clement, R.E. (1981) Development of Analytical Methodology for Airborne Particulate
Municipal Incinerator Ash, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Eicemen, G.A. (1979) "Analysis of Fly Ash from Municipal Incinerators'for Trace
Organic Compounds" Analytical Chemistry, 51, 2343.
German!, M.S. (1980) Selected Studies of Four High Temperature Air Pollution
Sources Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Law, S.L. and Gordon, G.E. (1979) "Sources of Metals in Municipal Incinerator
Emissions". ES&T, _13_, 433.
Shen, T.T. (1978) "Air Pollutants from Sewage Sludge Incineration". APCA Meeting,
Houston.
Road Dust:
Blumer, M. (1977) "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils of a Mountain Valley:
Correlation with Highway Traffic and Cancer Influence". ES&T, 11, 1083.
Ciacco, L.L. (1974) "Composition of Organic Constituents in Breathable Airborne
Particulate Matter Near a Hgihway". ES&T, _2_, 935.
Soil:
Rahn, K.A. (1976) "Silicon and Aluminum in Atmospheric Aerosols: Crust-Air
Fractionation?" Atmospheric Environment, 10, 597.
Taylor, S.R. (1964) "Abundance of Chemical Elements in the Continental Crust:
A New Table". Geochemica et Cosmochimia Acta, 28, 1273.
Komae, S.C. (1977) Size and Composition of Atmospheric Particles in Areas Near
Washington Ph.D./Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Steel Production:
Jacko, R.B. and Neuendorff (1977) "Trace Metal Particulate Emission Test Results
from a Number of Industrial and Muncipal Point Sources". JAPCA, 27, 989.
Lee, R.E. et al. "Concentration and Size of Trace Metal Emissions from a Power
Plant, A Steel Plant and a Cotton Gin". ES&T. 9, 643.
-------
Tire Dusts;
Dennis, M.L. (1974) "Rubber Dust from the Normal Wear of Tires". Rubber Chem-
istry and Technology, 47, 1011.
Pierson, W.R. and Brachaczek, W.W. (1975) "Airborne Particulate Debris from Rubber
Tires". Presented at the Conference on Environmental Aspects of Chemical Use in
Rubber Processing Operations, University of Akron, March 12-14, 1975.
Veneer Dryers;
Cronn, D.R. et al. (1983) "Chemical Characterization of Plywood Veneer Dryer
Emissions'". Atmospheric Environment, 17, 201.
Volcanoes:
German, M.S. (1980) Selected Studies of Four High Temperature Air Pollution
Sources Ph.D Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Welding:
Akellson, K. et al. (1974) "Elemental Abundance Variation with Particle Size in
Aerosols from Welding Operations". Proceedings of the Second International
Conference on Nuclear Methods in Environmental Research (University of Missouri),
p. 385.
Wood Stoves:
Butcher, S.S. and Sorenson, E.M. (1979) "A Study of Wood Stove Particulate Emissions
JAPCA, 29_, 724.
Cooper, J.A. (1980) "Environmental Impact of Residential Wood Combustions and
its Implications". JAPCA, 30, 855.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/4-85-002
2.
3, RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Receptor Model Source Composition Library
5. REPORT DATE
November 1984
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
John E. Core, et al.
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Nero & Associates, Portland, Oregon and
NEA Inc., Beaverton, Oregon
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-02-3837
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Air Management Technology Branch
Monitoring And Data Analysis Division
US EPA (MD 14)
Research Triangle, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Project Officer: Dallas W. Safriet
16. ABSTRACT
The information in this document is an initial effort to gather, evaluate
and compile technical data describing the chemical composition of source emissions.
Because of limited resources, this study has placed highest priority on the
inclusion of size resolved data sets that have been developed specifically for
receptor modeling studies. To the extent possible, and consistent with data
quality criteria, other studies reported in the literature have been included.
Because of the volume of data not size resolved, no attempt is made here to compile
all information on this subject currently available.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI F'ield/Group
Emissions
Chemical composition
Receptor modeling
Source composition
Emission size resolution
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport/
21. NO. OF PAGES
327
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page I
22. PRICE
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region V, Library
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
------- |