United States
         Environmental
         Protection
         Agency
       Office of Air Quality
       Planning and Standards
       Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-450/4-90-006E

APRIL 1990
         AIR
ปEPA
URBAN AIRSHED MODEL
STUDY OF FIVE CITIES
           A Low-Cost Application of the
        Urban Airshed Model to the New York
             Metropolitan Area and the
                City of St. Louis

-------
                         EPA-450/4-90-006E
URBAN AIRSHED MODEL
STUDY OF FIVE CITIES

     A Low-Cost Application of the
Urban Airshed Model to the New York
       Metropolitan Area and the
           City of St. Louis
                 By

              Ralph E. Morris
              Thomas C. Myers
              Henry Hogo
              Lyle R. Chinkin
              Lu Ann Gardner
              Robert G. Johnson
            Systems Applications, Inc.
            101 Lucas Valley Road
            San Rafael, CA 94903
             EPA Project Officers:

 John C. Chamberlin, Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation
 Richard D. Scheffe, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
   OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

      U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

       RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711

              APRIL 1990

-------
                         Disclaimer
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.  It has been subject to
the agency's review, and it has been approved for publication as
an EPA document.  Mention of trade names or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                Contents


Acknowledgments	     i
List of Figures	    iv
List of Tables	   viii
1    INTRODUCTION	     1
          Background	     1
          Comparison of EKMA and UAM	     1
          PLANR Use of UAM	     2
          EKMA Uses 	     4
          Study Objectives	     5
          Study Approach	     5
2    DESCRIPTION OF THE CB-IV VERSION OF THE URBAN
     AIRSHED MODEL (UAM(CB-IV))	     8
          Use of the Smolarkiewicz Algorithm to
          Solve the Advection Equation	     9
          Use of the CB-IV to Solve Photochemistry	    11
3    PREPARATION  OF UAM INPUTS FOR NEW YORK AND
     ST. LOUIS	    23
          UAM Input Requirements	    24
          Wind Field Preparation Procedure	    25
          New York  Application 	    26
          St. Louis Application 	    38
          Projection of Initial and Boundary Conditions to 1995  	    42
4    EMISSIONS INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT	    48
          Introduction	    48
          Definition  of Emissions Scenarios	    48
88151r2 1                             11

-------
          Overview of the Methodology Used for Generating
           Emission Inputs	     50
          Results	     63

5    ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN AIRSHED MODELING RESULTS 	    119

          Model Performance Evaluation	    119
          Analysis of  UAM Results for New York	    127
          Analysis of  UAM Results for St. Louis	    133

References	

Appendix A:   Protocol Document for Urban Airshed and EKMA Modeling
             in the New York Metropolitan Area

Appendix B:   Protocol Document for Urban Airshed and EKMA Modeling
             in the St. Louis Metropolitan Area

Appendix C:   Episode  Selection for St. Louis UAM Modeling

Appendix D:   Isopleths of Hourly Ozone Concentrations (pphm) and
             Hourly Ozone Concentration Differences (ppb) Between
             Scenarios for the New York Application of the UAM on
             the Afternoon of 8 August 1980

Appendix E:   Isopleths of Hourly Ozone Concentrations (pphm) and
             Hourly Ozone Concentration Differences (ppb) Between
             Scenarios for the St. Louis Application of the UAM
             on the Afternoon of 13 July 1976
 88151r2 1

-------
                                   Figures



2-1    NO, NO2 and O^ concentrations for Example 2 ....................     15

2-2    OH concentrations and HO2 concentrations for Example 1 ..........     16

2-3    OH concentrations and HO2 concentrations for Example 2 ..........     18

2-k    C2O3 concentrations for Example 1 ..............................     19

2-5    C2O^ concentrations for Example 2 ..............................     20

2-6    NO^ concentrations and N2O^ concentrations for Example 1  ........     21

3-1    OMNYMAP UAM modeling domain and location of surface and
       upper-air meteorological observation sites ........................     30

3-2    The St. Louis area with locations of the RAPS surface
       stations and 4x4 km modeling grid superimposed ..................     41
4-1    Flowchart for projection of 1985 emissions to 1995 ................     53

4-2    Spatial distribution of 1995 NOX emissions from elevated
       point sources for the New York study region ......................     64

4-3    Spatial distribution of 1995 ROG emissions from elevated
       point sources for the New York study region ......................     65

4-4    Spatial distribution of 1995 NOX emissions from elevated
       point sources for the St. Louis study region .......................     66

4-5    Spatial distribution of 1995 ROG emissions from elevated
       point sources for the St. Louis study region .......................     67

4-6    Spatial distribution of total 1995 NOX emissions from low
       level sources for scenario 1 for the New York study region ..........     69

4-7    Spatial distribution of total 1995 ROG emissions from low
       level sources for scenario 1 for the New York study region ..........     70
88151r2 I                                IV

-------
       Spatial distribution of total 1995 NOX emissions from low
       level sources for scenario 1 for the St. Louis study region	     70

       Spatial distribution of total 1995 ROG emissions from low
       level sources for scenario 1 for the St. Louis study region	     71

5-1    Locations of ozone monitors within the New York
       modeling domain	    138

5-2    Isopleths of predicted maximum daily ozone con-
       centrations with superimposed observations for the
       New York region  on 8 August 1980	    139

5-3    Time series of predicted and observed hourly ozone
       concentrations at all sites in the New York
       modeling domain	    140

5-4    Statistical performance measures and time series
       of predicted and observed hourly averaged ozone
       concentrations averaged over four sites in southern
       Connecticut	    148

5-5a   Scatterplot of predicted versus observed hourly
       ozone concentrations for New York region on
       8 August 1980	    149

5-5b   Residual analysis of observed minus predicted
       hourly ozone concentrations for New York region
       on 8 August 1980	    150

5-6a   Scatterplot of predicted versus observed maximum
       daily ozone concentrations for 8 August 1980 	    151

5-6b   Residual analysis of observed minus predicted maximum
       daily ozone concentrations for 8 August 1980 	    152

5-7    The St. Louis modeling domain showing the location
       of the RAPS ozone monitors	    153

5-8    Isopleths of predicted maximum daily ozone
       concentrations with superimposed maximum daily
       observations for the St. Louis region on 13 July 1976	    154
 88151r2

-------
5-9    Time series of predicted and observed hourly ozone
       concentrations at all sites in the St. Louis
       modeling domain  ..............................................    155

5-10a  Scatterplot of predicted versus observed hourly
       ozone concentrations for St. Louis region on
       13 3uly 1976 ............................................. .....    161

5-10b  Residual analysis of observed minus predicted
       hourly ozone concentrations for St. Louis region
       on 13 July  1976 ...............................................    162

5-1 la  Scatterplot of predicted versus observed maximum
       daily ozone concentrations for 13 3uly 1976 .......................    163

5-1 Ib  Residual analysis of observed minus predicted
       maximum daily ozone concentrations for 13 July 1976 ..............
5-12a  Percent contribution of boundary and emitted
       hydrocarbon tracer, 8 August 1980 . ..... . ........................    165

5-12b  Percent contribution of boundary and emitted
       NOX tracer, 8 August 1980 .....................................    177

5-13   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 1
       on 8 August 1980 ..............................................    189

5-14   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 2
       on 8 August 1980 ..............................................    190

5-15   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and scenario 2 ...............................    191

5-16   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 3
       for 8 August 1980 .............................................    192

5-17   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 2 and scenario 3 ...............................    193

5-18   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 4
       for 8 August 1980 .............................................    194

5-19   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and scenario 4 ................ . ..............    195
88151r2 1                                Vi

-------
5-20   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 1
       on 13 July 1976	    196

5-21   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 2
       on 13 July 1976	    197

5-22   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and scenario 2	    198

5-23   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 5
       on 13 July 1976	    199

5-24   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 7
       on 13 3uly 1976	    200

5-25   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 2 and scenario 5	    201

5-26   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 2 and scenario 7	    202

5-27   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for scenario 8
       on 13 duly 1976	    203

5-28   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and scenario 8	    204

5-29   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for SIP
       scenario A on 13 July 1976  	    205

5-30   Maximum daily ozone concentrations for SIP
       scenario B on 13 July 1976	    206

5-31   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and SIP scenario A	   207

5-32   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations
       between scenario 1 and SIP scenario B  	   208
 8 8 1 51r 2 1

-------
                                    Tables
2-1    The Carbon Bond Mechanism-IV .................................    12

3-1    Comparison of average wind speeds and wind directions used
       in the OMNYMAP study and those used in this study ...............    32

3-2    Respeciation of initial concentrations and
       emissions of hydrocarbons ......................................    33

3-3    Respeciation of boundary concentrations
       of hydrocarbons . . .............................................    34
3-4    Comparison of 1980 and 1995 mixed-layer southwestern boundary
       conditions used in this study and the mixed-layer southwestern
       boundary conditions used in the OMNYMAP 1988 Scope Base Case
       for 8 August 1980 .............................................    37

3-5    Surface roughness and deposition factors based
       on studies by Argonne National Laboratories ......................    39

3-6    Comparison of circa 78 and current surface
       roughness and vegetation factors ................................    43

3-7    Initial and boundary condition projection
       factors (St. Louis) .............................................    45

3-8    Initial and boundary condition projection
       factors (New York)  ............................................    45

3-9    Background concentrations for Carbon-Bond-IV
       species [[[    47

4-1    NAPAP area source category codes ..............................    73

4-2    NAPAP area source codes  and monthly and weekly allocation

-------
4-3    Relationship between cost pods, source categories, and source
       classification codes	     80

4-4a   Carbon monoxide emissions for New York and St. Louis CMSA	     91

4-4b   VOC emissions for New York and St. Louis CMSA	     93

4-5    Exhaust and evaporative emission separation factors for
       1985 NAPAP  	     95

4-6    I/M applicability by county	     96

4-7    Multiplicative factors for adjusting 1985 NAPAP annual emissions
       to 1985 episode day conditions and for converting  from MOBILE3
       to MOBILE3.9  	     97

4-8    Factors to multiply by exhaust VOC tons to obtain 1985
       uncontrolled refueling .VOC tons for episode day conditions  	     99

4-9    Factors to increase 1985 exhaust VOC to account  for
       unmeasured aldehydes  	    100

4-10   Growth factors for motor vehicle emissions	    100

4-11   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenarios
       1 and 8 	    101

4-12   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 2	    102

4-13   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 5  	    103

4-14   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 7  	   104

4-15   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenarios
        1 and 4 	   105

4-16   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 2  	   106

4-17    1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 3  	   107
 88151r2 1                                IX

-------
4-18   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
       effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 5 	    108

4-19   Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
       (oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for St. Louis
       scenario 3	    109

4-20   Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
       (oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for St. Louis
       scenario 5	    110

4-21   Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
       (oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for St. Louis
       scenario 7	    Ill

4-22   Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
       (oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for New York
       scenario 3	    112

4-23   Relationship between NAPAP area source category codes and
       area source types used for gridding purposes	    113

4-24   Speciation of evaporative VOC emissions by weight
       percent of VOC	    116

4-25   Speciation of exhaust VOC emissions by weight percent of VOC
       into CB-IV species	    117

4-26   Total and on-road motor-vehicle-related emissions
       of ROG, CO, and NOX by scenario	    118

5-1    Ozone monitoring sites within the New York
       modeling domain	    209

5-2    UAM model performance for 8 August  1980 hourly ozone
       concentrations (comparison of application of the UAM (CB-IV)
       in this study and application of the UAM (CB-II) in the
       OMNYMAP studies)  	    210

5-3    UAM model performance for 13 3uly 1980 hourly ozone
       concentrations (comparison of application of the UAM (CB-IV)
       in this study and application of the UAM (CB-II) in the
       St. Louis Ozone Modeling Project)	    211
88151r2 1                                X

-------
5-4    Summary of region-wide total emission rates, hydrocarbon-to-NOx
       ratios, and percent differences for the 1995 scenarios 1 and 2
       by scenario	    212

5-5    Comparison of predicted peak ozone, percent change in peak
       ozone, and VOC emissions between scenarios 1 and 2 and all
       other 1995 emissions scenarios	    213
 aei5ir2 i                                X1

-------
                             1  INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND

Reducing ozone concentrations to levels below the National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) has proven to be far more difficult than was thought when the
Clean Air Act was passed and amended. The level of ozone precursor emissions
remains too high; thus historical emission  reductions have been too small or have
been required of the wrong sources, or both.  Determining the actions needed to
improve ozone air quality entails confronting complex scientific, engineering, eco-
nomic, and political questions.

A plethora of technical explanations have been offered for failure to attain the
ozone standard; several can be traced to perceived weaknesses in the attainment
planning process (Federal Register, 1987;  OTA, 1988a,b,c) and to incomplete under-
standing or recognition of the anthropogenic and natural factors that cause elevated
tropospheric ozone levels (Science, 1988). The EPA, after lengthy consideration, has
described a comprehensive  policy that proposes major changes in the planning pro-
cess (Federal Register, 1987).  These changes include (1) improvements in modeling
practices and (2) requirements for improving the emissions, air quality, and meteoro-
logical data bases to support improved modeling practices. The EPA is now evaluat-
ing public comments on the proposed policy.
COMPARISON OF EKMA AND UAM

The EPA recommends that states use the Urban Airshed Model (UAM), a three-
dimensional photochemical grid model, for ozone modeling applications (EPA,
1986).  As an alternative approach, the Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach
(EKMA) has been accepted by the EPA for demonstrating attainment for most State
Implementation Plan (SIP) activities (Federal Register, 1987). The primary differ-
ence between the UAM and the EKMA stems from the trajectory nature of the
EKMA versus the grid nature of the UAM.  It is now generally recognized that the
UAM incorporates a more complete description of  the physical processes that govern
ozone formation in urban areas than does the EKMA (Seinfeld, 1988a). The UAM also
has a proven ability to reliably reproduce the magnitude and pattern of ozone con-
centrations in urban areas under meteorological conditions associated with ozone
concentrations that exceed the ozone  NAAQS (Seinfeld, 1988a, I988b; Burton, 1988).
88151r2  13

-------
EKMA treats the atmospheric chemistry of a single parcel of air as representative of
one trajectory reaching an observed ozone maximum and uses the Carbon-Bond
Mechanism (CBM-IV) to describe ozone formation (Gery, Whitten, and Killus, 1988
and references cited therein). The EKMA calculation begins at 0800 LSI with a
specified initial loading of precursors (initial conditions), and more emissions are
added each hour on the basis of county-wide emission averages using default
reactivities for  the VOC emissions for each class of compounds used in CBM-IV. The
UAM divides an urban area into grid cells, and simulates the spatially (both hori-
zontally and vertically) varying transport, diffusion, chemical transformation, depo-
sition, and emissions distribution within the urban area by solving the physical
governing equations for these processes; the UAM also uses the CBM-IV mechanism.
The UAM is usually  initiated a day or more before the ozone episode to minimize the
effect of initial conditions, and the different reactivities of the VOC emission
sources are explicitly treated. Whenever possible, the boundaries of the modeling
region are chosen in a manner that reduces the effects of boundary values on ozone
concentrations within the region being modeled.

The EKMA modeling approach has been more widely used in the past because it is
simpler to apply.  Reluctance to use the UAM  has been based on the perception that
it requires  technical skills and computer resources that are too costly and that data
requirements are too intensive. This view has prevailed despite the fact that the
UAM has been installed and run on enhanced IBM-compatible personal computers
(PCs). When examined side by side, the input requirements of the UAM and EKMA—
winds, mixing heights, emissions, etc.—are somewhat similar; they differ primarily in
the fact that the UAM requires gridded fields  of input parameters and more exten-
sive emissions data  (Seinfeld, 1988a).
PLANR Use of UAM

Most of the cost of applying the UAM is attributed to the practice of conducting an
extensive UAM performance evaluation, which in turn entails many diagnostic simu-
lations. This evaluation enables us to understand why the UAM performs as it does
for each application and, if deemed necessary, to take actions to improve model per-
formance.  Historically, it has been expected that the UAM will calculate hourly
ozone concentrations to within approximately 15 to 20 percent of the observed peak
value (Seinfeld, 1988a; Burton, 1988). This high level of performance achieved by the
UAM far exceeds the expectations and requirements of any other EPA-recommended
model (EPA, 1986), including EKMA, which cannot in the strict sense be evaluated
(Seinfeld, 1988).  More recent applications of the UAM to the Los Angeles basin have
used routinely available meteorological data and predicted observed ozone levels
with a high degree of skill (Seinfeld, 1988a; Hogo, Mahoney, and Yocke, 1988).  A
recent application of the UAM to the New York metropolitan area carried out by the
state of New York used  simple inputs (constant wind fields and mixing depths) (Rao,
1987).  Model performance results in this application were adequate and appear to
offer a much more robust method for calculating emission control requirements and
planning for attainment of the ozone NAAQS than can be expected from EKMA.

88151r2 13

-------
This use of the UAM, which relies on routinely available data and reduces the
requirement for strict model performance evaluations, offers a practical air quality
assessment tool that air quality managers can use to identify emission control
strategies that demonstrate attainment of the ozone NAAQS.  This Practice-for-
Low-cost-Airshed-application-for-Nonattainment-Regions (PLANR) use of the UAM
could be exercised with almost the same quantity and quality of inputs as required by
EKMA, and the overall application cost would be substantially reduced. The possible
exception is the emissions inventory, which, in the PLANR UAM application, should
still contain spatially (horizontally and vertically) and temporally varying emissions
that account for the differing  reactivities of VOC emissions. However, local
agencies generally have emissions inventories at hand, and UAM input inventories
can be readily estimated from existing national  emissions inventories (e.g., the
National Acid Precipitation Program (NAPAP) 1980 and 1985 inventories). In addi-
tion, estimates of the emission controls required to achieve attainment of the ozone
NAAQS require knowledge of current emission rates.

The PLANR use of the UAM may not be appropriate for use in all nonattainment
regions. When attainment is perceived to be imminent, improved methods for using
EKMA may be adequate.  In other more complex situations, such as the Los Angeles
basin, complex meteorological conditions, emissions distribution, and severity of the
ozone attainment problem probably require a more detailed application of the
UAM. Similar requirements are also envisioned for the Houston area, the lower Lake
Michigan area, portions of the northeastern United States, and other areas in Cali-
fornia. This Practice-of-Airshed-application-in-Complex-Regions (PACR) use of the
UAM would involve more extensive model performance requirements and hence more
diagnostic simulations and a resultant increase in costs.  However, even for a com-
plex nonattainment region, the PLANR UAM approach would probably be a more
comprehensive and reliable method than EKMA  for estimating control requirements
needed to achieve ozone attainment.

This report presents the application of the UAM to the New York metropolitan area
and the city of St. Louis.  In a strict sense these two UAM applications are not true
PLANR uses of the UAM because (1) the episodes studied made use of UAM  inputs
prepared in previous modeling studies, (2) the preparation of the UAM model inputs
made use of nonroutine meteorological (St. Louis) or air quality (New York) observa-
tions, and (3) due to larger amounts of transported pollutants and complex land-sea
meteorology, the New York region is not a PLANR region. In Phase  II of the Five
Cities Project, we will conduct true PLANR applications of UAM for the cities of
Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Philadelphia. In addition, we will repeat the St.
Louis analysis using routinely available data.

Although the New York and St. Louis applications cannot be considered true PLANR
uses of the UAM, this report represents the first demonstration of several features
of the PLANR use of the UAM since (1) the UAM inputs were prepared according to
PLANR objective procedures and used any available meteorological and air quality
88151r2  13

-------
data; (2) emissions inputs for the 1995 scenarios were developed from the 1985
NAPAP county emissions inventory; and (3) no attempt was made to adjust the UAM
inputs to improve model performance; only one simulation was performed for the
model performance evaluation.
EKMAUses

The EKMA can be extremely valuable for calculating the relative reactivities of dif-
ferent species, or for estimating emission control requirements for regions that have
a well-defined urban core and trajectory to the location of the observed ozone
maximum.  Examples of EKMA use are the studies by the EPA (1987a) and Whitten
(1988) that investigated the possible impacts on urban-ozone formation from use of
ethanol-blended gasoline fuels.

The use of petroleum-based fuels in the transportation sector represents a major
contribution to both CO and the ozone air Quality problem. Several studies  have sug-
gested oxygenated fuels as replacements for conventional gasoline fuels.  The use of
ethanol  (or methanol) blends offers environmental benefits due to reduced levels of
CO emissions; however, their increased volatility has the potential to hinder ozone
attainment. The two studies that used EKMA to estimate the effects of ethanol-
blended fuels on urban ozone formation indicated that whether the use  of ethanol-
blended fuels ultimately degrades, improves, or has no effect on ozone  air quality
depends on the reactivity of the emissions (including CO) that result from their use
relative to the reactivity of emissions from  the use of conventional gasoline fuels.

Increases in ozone caused by enhanced evaporative emissions of VOCs from the etha-
nol blends may be offset by reductions in tailpipe CO emissions.  The studies indica-
ted that when the average default reactivity was used  in the EKMA (an approach
that does not require knowledge of the composition of  the evaporative  emissions but
that probably overstates the reactivity and therefore the ozone-formation potential)
for the ethanol blends, increases in urban ozone concentrations were usually calcu-
lated. In one study that attempted to explicitly treat the reactivity of the emissions
resulting from the use of ethanol-blended fuels (Whitten, 1988), there was a net
decrease in urban ozone concentrations compared to conventional gasoline fuels.
However, the reactivity of the ethanol emissions  may have been underestimated, and
the use  of a region-wide average emission rate and other simplifications in  the
EKMA may affect calculations of the effects  of ethanol blending.

The  UAM can examine more than just the explicit chemistry of the evaporative
automotive emissions affected by the use of ethanol-blended fuels. For example, the
UAM can treat the different reactivities, timing, and locations of the mobile
evaporative and exhaust emissions, but the simple EKMA cannot. The  possibility
that such subtleties as emissions timing and location can significantly affect the
results of the EKMA-based study may be remote; however, it has been calculated
that ethanol-blended fuels can produce small net decreases in ozone predicted by
 88151r2 13

-------
EKMA when the differing reactivities are taken into account.  Furthermore, the
small net decreases and increases in ozone predicted by EKMA when the model uses
the default reactivity assumption need to be addressed through use of the UAM,
which can account for such subtleties in emission characteristics and distributions.
STUDY OBJECTIVES

The EPA has funded the Five Cities UAM Modeling Project to address the PLANR
application of the UAM and to examine the effects of ethanol-blended fuels on urban
ozone formation.  The five main objectives of the Five Cities study are as follows:

     1.    Demonstrate the Practice-for-Low-cost-Airshed-application-for-Non-
           attainment-Regions (PLANR) use of the UAM for air quality planning;

     2.    Determine the effects of ethanol-blended fuels and alternative Reid
           Vapor Pressure (RVP) values for fuels on ozone concentrations in a num-
           ber of urban areas, and compare UAM results with those obtained with
           EKMA;

     3.    Investigate and clarify the effects of VOC reactivity potential in emis-
           sion control strategy evaluations;

     4.    Demonstrate the PLANR use of the UAM for SIP control strategy evalua-
           tions, and compare the results with those obtained through use of the
           EKMA modeling approach; and

     5.    Transfer the UAM modeling data bases and application technology to the
           states for use in future SIPs.

this report documents the first phase of the Five Cities Project, which involves using
modified PLANR procedures  for applying the UAM to two urban areas: the New
York metropolitan area and St. Louis. However, as noted previously, since these two
applications did use nonroutine data, they are not true PLANR applications.
STUDY APPROACH

To meet the extreme time constraints imposed on the first phase of the Five Cities
Project, use of the PLANR procedures for applying UAM to New York and St. Louis
will rely on existing historical UAM inputs. The New York application of the UAM
will adapt one of the inputs prepared by the New. York Department of Environmental
Conservation that span the hours 0400 to 2000 LST on 8 August 1980 (Rao, 1987).
The St. Louis application of the UAM will adapt one episode of UAM inputs from the
St. Louis ozone modeling project (Schere and Shreffler, 1982; Cole et al., 1983).
881Slr2  13

-------
Phase one of the Five Cities Project will be accomplished by carrying out the follow-
ing tasks:

     1.   Acquire the existing UAM inputs for the New York metropolitan area on
          8 August 1980 and several UAM inputs from the St. Louis modeling pro-
          ject. Select a St. Louis UAM input episode for further analysis.

     2.   Improve the existing UAM inputs to incorporate more recent techniques
          in developing meteorological inputs for the UAM. Extend the UAM
          modeling periods to minimize the effects of initial conditions.

     3.   Adapt the existing emissions inventory and air quality inputs, which were
          derived for the CB-II chemical mechanisms, to the new UAM(CB-IV).

     b.   Carry out a limited performance evaluation using the improved UAM
          inputs, the adapted  existing inventories, and the UAM(CB-IV).

     5.   Develop techniques for converting  the 1985 NAPAP annual county emis-
          sions inventory to the UAM formats.  This effort will involve adjustment
          to the episodic period, inclusion of  source-category-specific diurnal
          variation and speciation, inclusion of running loss emissions, projection of
          the emission inventory to  1995, and adjustment of the mobile emissions
          inventory to account for the effects of temperature, differing RVP fuel
          values, and ethanol-blended fuels.  In addition, at least one SIP emission
          control strategy inventory will be developed for St. Louis.

     6.   Use the PLANR procedures for preparing inputs for the UAM and exer-
          cise the UAM(CB-IV) for New York and St. Louis for at least four emis-
          sion scenarios reflecting differing RVP fuel values and ethanol blends and
          for at least one St.  Louis SIP control strategy.

     7.   Deliver and install on the  State of  New York's computer system  a com-
          piled version of the UAM(CB-IV) and all modeling input files used in the
          PLANR application of the UAM to the New York modeling region.  Pro-
          vide copies of these input files to the EPA's Office of Air Quality Plan-
          ning and Standards (OAQPS) Source Receptor Analysis Branch (SRB).

     8.   Prepare a draft report documenting the effects of VOC reactivity on
          urban-ozone formation.

This report documents Tasks 1  through 6 of Phase I of the Five Cities UAM Modeling
Project.  The UAM (CB-IV) was delivered and  installed on the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation computer system (Task 7) in October,
1988.  Section 2 describes the CB-IV version of the UAM; Section 3 discusses pre-
paration of UAM inputs for New York and St.  Louis; Section 4 describes development
of the  emissions inventory; Section 5  presents an analysis of the UAM modeling
results.

88151r2  13                                6

-------
The procedures to be followed for the application of the UAM to New York and St.
Louis have been outlined in two modeling protocol documents.  These two documents,
presented in Appendixes A and B, form the basis of  the UAM modeling study
described in this report.  The analysis contained in this report deviates slightly from
the protocol documents (Appendixes A and B) in that no EKMA analysis is presen-
ted.  The EKMA analysis has been omitted because the UAM modeling  analysis was
conducted for a future year (1995), whereas EKMA requires the use of  historical
observations (measured 0600-0900 VOC and NOX concentrations and maximum daily
observed ozone concentrations). Thus, results of the UAM and EKMA could not be
compared under Phase 1 of the Five Cities UAM Modeling Project.
88I51r2  13

-------
                  DESCRIPTION OF THE CB-IV VERSION OF THE
                    URBAN AIRSHED MODEL (UAM(CB-IV))
The Urban Airshed Model (UAM) is a three-dimensional grid model designed to calcu-
late the concentrations of both inert and chemically reactive pollutants by simula-
ting the various physical and chemical processes that take place in the atmosphere.
The basis of the UAM is the atmospheric diffusion or species continuity equation.
This equation represents a mass balance in which all of the relevant emissions, trans-
port, diffusion, chemical reaction, and removal processes are expressed in mathe-
matical terms. Based on the grid concept, the model is generally employed to simu-
late an 8- to 72-hour period during which episodic meteorological conditions persist.

Because the model can  resolve both spatial and temporal features of the concentra-
tion field, it is well suited to the analysis of future control strategies and their
effects  on air quality in various parts of the modeling region. This analysis is
accomplished by first replicating a historical ozone episode.  Model inputs are pre-
pared on the basis of observed meteorological, emission, and air quality data for a
particular day or days.  The model is then evaluated with these inputs to determine
its "performance." Evaluation of the model is necessary before the modeled episode
can be used as the basis for future air quality predictions. Once the model inputs
have been evaluated  and determined to perform within prescribed levels, the emis-
sion inventory can be changed to replicate possible future emission scenarios (e.g.,
future base case conditions and the effects of alternative emission control strate-
gies). The model simulation is then re-run with the forecasted emissions, resulting in
hourly ozone patterns likely to occur in similar future meteorological/emission con-
figurations.

The UAM is the only air quality model recommended by the EPA for photochemical
or reactive pollutant modeling applications involving entire urban areas (EPA,
1986). The EPA guidelines refer to the 1978-1980 version of the UAM, which
contains the Carbon-Bond Mechanism-Version II (CB-II) (Whitten, Killus, and Hogo,
1980) for chemical transformation and uses the Sharp and Smooth Transport Algor-
ithm (SHASTA) (Boris and Book, 1973) for advection.  The formulation of the 1978-
1980 UAM is discussed  in Ames et al. (1985). Over the last 10 years there have been
improvements to the UAM. The two most significant updates to the latest  1988
version  of the UAM,  the UAM (CB-IV), are as follows:
88151rl 5

-------
     I.   Incorporation of the latest version of the Carbon-Bond Mechanism, the
          CB-IV (Gery, Whitten, and Killus, 1988)

     2.   Use of the Smolarkiewicz algorithm for advection (Smolarkiewicz, 1983)

These two features are discussed in the following subsections.
USE OF THE SMOLARKIEWICZ ALGORITHM TO SOLVE
THE ADVECTION EQUATION

Grid-based air quality simulation models require a numerical approximation of the
horizontal advection terms in the species conservation equations. The 1978-1980
version of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM) utilizes a variant of the Sharp and Smooth
Transport Algorithm (SHASTA) originally formulated by Boris and Book (1973).
Conceptually, the SHASTA scheme can be divided into two steps: (1) a second-order
"transport" step, which introduces significant numerical diffusion; and (2) a fourth-
order "anti-diffusion" step, which removes a portion of the diffusion introduced by
the transport step. SHASTA is exercised in a "time-split" sense, i.e., advection
calculations  for each horizontal direction are carried out separately within a given
time step.

In the original SHASTA formulation, a "flux  limitation" constrains the anti-diffusion
step so that  it does not by itself produce maxima or minima in the advected field.
Killus and co-workers (1977) replaced the SHASTA "flux  limitation" constraint with
the imposition of an arbitrary positive minimum on the advected field, an artifice
that prevents negative concentrations but precludes conservation of mass.  They
demonstrated that "non-flux-limited, non-mass-conservative" SHASTA displayed
accuracy superior to both standard SHASTA and to the Price et al. (1966) advection
scheme utilized in the original UAM. Thus, non-flux-limited, non-mass-conservative
SHASTA was adopted for the UAM.  We refer to this advection scheme as "UAM-
SHASTA" in the  following discussion.

Although UAM-SHASTA is economical and has produced credible UAM results in a
variety of applications, its behavior can be undesirable in certain situations.  Even
with the "anti-diffusion" operator, UAM-SHASTA can be highly diffusive. A portion
of this numerical diffusion is velocity-independent; if the wind velocity at a given
point is zero, UAM-SHASTA will produce a spurious advective change in the species
concentration at that point. Killus et al. (1977) show that UAM-SHASTA is most
accurate when the Courant number u At/Ax = 0.5.   If the Courant number exceeds
0.5, the scheme  is unstable; as the Courant number decreases  from 0.5, the accuracy
of the scheme deteriorates.

In the current UAM, At is determined so that the Courant number is 0.5 for the
maximum value  of u or v in the three-dimensional input  wind field.  In regions of
complex terrain, wind speeds can vary between, say, 1 and 10  m s   within a UAM
 88151rl  5

-------
domain at a given time; in this situation, inaccuracies in the simulation of horizontal
transport can be expected in low-wind subregions.  This behavior motivated investi-
gation of a possible replacement for UAM-SHASTA.

Since 1977 there have been many comparative studies of advection schemes.  Exam-
ples of such studies relevant to the UAM are those of Schere (1983), Chock and
Dunker (1983), Chock (1985), and Smolarkiewicz (1983).  In each of these studies, an
idealized scalar function (a cone, block, ellipse, or cosine wave) representative of a
concentration distribution is advected by a rotating wind field (constant angular
velocity). The rotating wind field implies a range of Courant numbers, depending on
radial distance from the center of the domain.  The degree to which the attributes of
the idealized function (total mass, peak value, mean value, and gradients) are pre-
served indicates the accuracy of the scheme.

The above studies show that a number of advection schemes are more accurate than
UAM-SHASTA, as measured by the idealized tests. The specific requirements of the
UAM narrow the selection of candidate schemes.  First, it is important that the
scheme be positive definite, i.e., that it not result in negative concentrations.
Second, the scheme should utilize forward time differencing to minimize storage
requirements and to insure compatibility with chemical mechanism numerics.  Third,
the ability of an advection scheme to represent the magnitudes and locations of peak
concentrations is of major importance in regulatory applications.  Fourth, to handle
complex  airflows, the scheme should display relatively uniform accuracy over a wide
range of  Courant numbers.

Further review indicated  that the advection scheme developed by Smolarkiewicz
(1983) may represent the  best combination of accuracy and economy. The
Smolarkiewicz scheme is  conceptually similar to SHASTA, in that a highly diffusive
transport step is followed by an anti-diffusive correction step.  The transport step is
essentially the well-known "upstream" finite-difference scheme.  The correction step
involves a second exercise of the upstream finite  difference scheme, substituting the
anti-diffusive velocity for the actual velocity.  The Smolarkiewicz scheme is positive
definite and forward in time, and can be utilized in either a time-split or multi-
dimensional  mode. Smolarkiewicz demonstrated the scheme to be superior in both
accuracy and economy to the multidimensional generalization of  SHASTA formulated
by Zalesak (1979).  (Note  that Schere (1983) shows the Zalesak scheme to be more
accurate than UAM-SHASTA.)

Our investigations of UAM applications to Kern County, California (Whitten et ai.,
1985) and the Los Angeles area (Hogo, Mahoney, and Yocke, 1988) found the SHASTA
algorithm to be inaccurate in that a "pseudo" buildup of mass occurred (as much as
10 percent within the first hour of simulation). When the Smoiarkiewicz algorithm
was incorporated into the UAM and tested with the same input data, the "pseudo"
buildup did not occur. Thus, the  Smolarkiewicz algorithm has been implemented in
the UAM (CB-IV) because it is accurate, positive  definite, forward in time, and
economical.
 88 151rl  5
                                     10

-------
USE OF THE CB-IV TO SOLVE PHOTOCHEMISTRY

The latest version of the Carbon-Bond Mechanism (CBM-IV) and associated computer
subroutines needed to solve time-dependent chemistry have been implemented in the
UAM (CB-IV). Table 2-1 lists the full CBM-IV chemical mechanism. For a complete
description of the CBM-IV, the reader is referred to Gery, Whitten, and Killus (1988).

As with any new merger of chemistry into a large air quality simulation model
(AQSM), the predictive capabilities and solution speed of the new computer code
required optimization and evaluation.  This process is even more pertinent at present
because the recent generation of gas-phase chemical kinetics mechanisms (CAL,
RADM, and the CBM-IV) are larger than previous mechanisms and therefore require
significantly more computing time.  Using internal resources, Systems Applications,
Inc. implemented the CBM-IV in the Urban Airshed Model. There are some minor
differences between Table 2-1 and implementation of the CB-IV in the UAM. For
example, isoprene was not a species in the UAM applied in this report since it is not
an important species in urban photochemistry of Los Angeles and can be accurately
modeled using other species in the CB-IV. However, isoprene is to be included in the
UAM (CB-IV) in the future.  In addition, specifically for this project, ethanol (ETOH)
was added as a species. The ethanol reaction is:

     ETOH + OH + ALD2 + HO, with a rate constant of 4,300 	W-  .
                            t-                           ppm-min

Both numerical and chemical improvements were made to the CB-IV representation
so that computational speed could be increased, and solution uncertainty diminished.

Evaluations such as those discussed here should be performed during implementation
of all new mechanisms because of the conflicting constraints of high computing costs
for large AQSMs and somewhat limited accuracy of faster solution techniques.
These constraints result  in an operational tradeoff between the time required to per-
form chemistry calculations and the accuracy of the predicted concentrations. For
any given mechanism and solution technique, either speed or accuracy is inevitably
sacrificed. However, when we implemented the CBM-IV in the UAM, we  were able
to slightly modify the solution technique to minimize the need for a tradeoff
between speed and accuracy. In some cases, we were able to improve computer solu-
tion time without loss of solution accuracy, and in others, we actually improved the
chemistry representation and thus obtained more accurate concentrations. We next
consider each of these solution algorithms individually.
 88151rl  5

-------
TABLE  2-1.   The Carbon  Bond Mechanism-IV.'
                                                                                 Reaction Rate Data
Number
  1)
  2}
  3)
  4)
  3)
  6)
  7)
  8)
  9)
 10)
 11)
 12)
 13)
 14)
 15)
 16)
 17)
 18)
 19)
 20)
 21)
 22)
 23)
 24)
 25)
 26)
 27)
 28)
 29)
 30)
 3D
 32)
 33)
 34)
 35)
 36)
 37)
 38)
 39)
 40)
 41)
 42)
 43)
 44)
 45)
 46)
 47)
 48)
 49)
 51)
03
0
0
0
03
03
03

N03
N03
N03
NO
NO
OH

OH
HONO
OH
OH
H02
H02

OH
H02
H02'

OH
OH
FORM
FORM
FORM
AL02
ALD2
ALD2

C203
C203

C203
C203
                           Reaction1
N02
0
NO
N02
N02
NO
N02
03
03
010
010
OH
H02
N03
NO
N02
N02
N205
N205
NO
N02
NO
HONO
HONO
HONO
N02
HNU3
NO
N02
PNA
PNA
H02
H02
H202
H202
CO
OH
FORM
FORM
0
N03
0
OH
N03
ALD2
NO
N02
PAN
C203
H02

OH

                   -hv4->
             + H20
             + H20
+ H20
+ H20
      -h\3->
                   -h\2->
                   -h\3->
-hv6->
NO + 0
03
N02
NO
N03
N02
N03
0
01D
0
2.000H
H02
OH
0.89N02 + 0.890  +  0.11NO
2.00N02
NO   + N02
N205
2.00HN03
N03  + N02
2.00N02
2.00HONO
HONO
OH   + NO
N02
NO
HN03
N03
OH
PNA
H02
N02
H202
H202
2.000H
H02
H02
H02  +
CO   +
CO
OH   +
HN03
C203
C203
C203
FORM
N02
PAN
C203 + N02
2.00FORM +
0.79FORM +
0.790H
X02  + FORM
                   +  N02
                   +  N02
                   + N02
                     CO
                     2.00H02

                     H02
                     H02
                     OH
CO
CO
                    HN03
                    X02
                    X02
CO
FORM
+ 2.00H02
+ H02
                        2.00X02 + 2.00H02
                        0.79X02 + 0.79H02 +

                         + H02
                                                           Pre-factor   Temp. Factor   Rate Constant @ 298K
                                                           (ppnTnnrin'1}  exp((-E/R)/T)
                                                                                                      (ppm~nmin*1)
                                               8.383  E+04
                                               2.643  E+03
                                               1.375  E+04
                                               2.303  E+02
                                               3.233  E+02
                                               1.760  E+02
                                               5.300  E-02
                               *EXP(  1175/T)
                               *EXP(- 1370/T)

                               *EXP(   687/T)
                               *EXP(   602/T)
                               *EXP(- 2450/T)
                                                            1.147 E+05  *EXP(   390/T)
                     .260
                     .344 E+03
                     .100 E+01
                     .390 E+01
                    1.909 E+04
                    3.660 E+01
                    7.849 E+02
                    1.900 E-06
                    2.110 E+16
                    2.600 E-05
                    1.600 E-ll
                    6.554 E+02
                    1.975 E-01
                    9.770 E+03
                    1.500 E-05
                    1.537 E+03
                    7.600
                    5.482 E+03
                    1.640 E+02
                    2.876 E+15
                    1.909 E+03
                    8.739 E+01
                    7.690 E-10
                    2.550 E-01
                    4.720 E+03
                    3.220 E+02
                    1.500 E+04
                                                          *EXP(-
                                                          *EXP(-

                                                          *EXP(
                                                          *EXP(-
                                                          *EXP(

                                                          *EXP(-
                                                          *EXP(
                                  940/T)
                                  580/T)

                                  250/T)
                                 1230/T)
                                  256/T)

                                10897/T)
                                  530/T)
                                                          *EXP(   806/T)
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(-
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(
                          *EXP(
                                                            713/T)
                                                           1000/T)
                                                            240/T)
                                                            749/T)
                                                          10121/T)
                                                            380/T)
                                                           1150/T)
                                                           5800/T)
                                                          *EXP(-  187/T)
               4.302 E+04  *EXP(- 1550/T)
               9.300 E-01
               1.739 E+04  *EXP(-  986/T)
               1.037 E+04  *EXP(   250/T)
               3.700
                                         7.915  E+03  *EXP(   250/T)
                                         1.180  E-04  *EXP(  5500/T)
                                         5.616  E+18  *EXP(-14000/T)
                                         3.700  E+03
                                                            9.600 E+03
                                                            6.521 E+03
                               *EXP(- 1710/T)
 see notes
4.323 E+06
2.664 E+01
1.375 E+04
2.309 E+03
2.438 E+03
4.731 E-02
5.300 E-02xk!
 see notes
4.246 E+05
3.260
1.000 E+02
2.999'
3.390 E+Olxkj
4.416 E+04
5.901 E-01
1.853 E+03
1.900 E-06
2.776
1.539 E-04
1.600 E-ll
9.799 E+03
1.975 E-Olxk,
9.770 E+03
1.500 E-05
1.682 E+04
2.179 E+02
1.227 E+04
2.025 E+03
5.115
6.833 E+03
4.144 E+03
2.181 E-01
2.550 E-01xk39
2.520 E+03
3.220 E+02
1.500 E+04
 see notes
 see notes
2.370 E+02
9.300 E-01
6.360 E+02
2.400 E+04
3.700
 see notes
1.831 E+04
1.223 E+04
2.220 E-02
3.700 E+03

9.600 E+03
2.100 E+01
*As  currently  implemented  in  the  UAM  (CB-IV),  isoprene is  not  explicitly
 treated as  a  separate  species,  and ethanol  has been  added to  the  CB-IV.
                                                                                                      (Continued)
  88097
  88151
                                               12

-------
 TABLE  2-1    Concluded.
 Number



  52)

  J>3)

  54)
  55)
  56)


  !>7)

  58)


  59)

  60)

  61)

  62)
  63)

  64)
  6S>)
  66)

  67)
  68)
  69)
  70)

  71)

*

  72)

  73)
' 74)
. 75)


  76)


  77)
  78)
  79)
  80)
  81)
                  Reaction*
                                                                                    Reaction Rate Data
PAR   + OH

        ROR

        ROR
ROR   + N02
0     + OLE


OH    + OLE

03    + OLE
N03

0

OH

03
OH

T02

OH

CRES
CKO

OPEN

OPEN


OH
OH
03
+ OLE

+ ETH

+ ETH

+ ETH
+ TOL

+ NO
  T02
+ CRES

+ N03
+ N02
  OPEN
t- OH

+ 03


+ XYL
OH .   + MGLY
        MGLY
0     + ISOP
+ ISOP
+ ISOP
N03   + ISOP
X02   + NO
X02   + X02
X02N  + NO
•h\ฃ->
             -h\2->

                     0.87X02  + 0.13X02N + 0.11H02  +
                     0.11ALD2 + 0.76ROR  - 0.11PAR
                     1.10ALD2 + 0.96X02  + 0.94H02  +
                     U.04X02N + 0.02ROR  - 2.10PAR
                     H02
0.63ALD2
0.30CO
0.22PAซ
FORM
H02
0.50AL02
0.44H02
- PAR
0.91X02
O.U9X02N
FORM
1.70H02
X02
0.22ALD2
FORM
0.08X02
0.56T02
0.90N02
CRES
0.40CRO
0.300PEN
CRO

C203
X02
C203
0.03ALD2
O.U3X02
0.76H02
0.70H02
0.80MGLY
X02
C203
0.60H02
0.50X02
0.90PAR
X02
0.40MGLY
0.20ALD2
FORM
0.20MGLY
0.44H02
X02N
N02
                                0.38H02
                                0.20FORM
                                0.200H
                                ALD2
                                PAR
                                0.74FORM
                                0.22X02
                            +  0.28X02   +
                            +  0.02X02N  +
                 + FORM
                 + N02
                 + 0.70X02
                 + 0.300H
                 + 1.56FORM

                 + 0.42CO
                 + 0.36CRES

                 + 0.90H02
                 + H02
                 + 0.60X02

                 + HN03
         + X02

         + 0.33CO
         + 0.100H

         + ALD2
         - PAR
         + CO  +

         + H02  +

         + 0.12H02
           0.44H02

         + 0.900PEN

         + 0.60H02
H02
2.00CO
FORM
0.62C203
0.69CO
0.20MGLY
0.50X02
1.10PAR
C203
H02
0.80AL02
0.50CO

FORM
0.20C203
0.13X02N
0.40ALD2
0.10PAR
0.100H
+ CO
+ 2.00H02  +

+ 0.70FORM +
+ 0.080H   +

+ 0.20CRES +
+ 0.30T02

+ CO
+ 0.550LE  +
+ 0.45ETH  +

+ 0.67H02  +
+ l.OOETH  +
                              0.55ETH
                              0.06CO
                                                       Pre-factor
                                                      Temp. Factor
                                                      exp((-ฃ
                                                             Rate  Constant  P  298K
                                                               1^298 (ppm^min*1)
                                          1.203 E+03

                                          6.250 E+16   *EXP(- 8000/T)
                                          9.545 E+04
                                          2.200 E+04
1.756 E+04  *EXP(-  324/T)

7.740 E+03  *EXP(   504/T)


2.104 E+01  *EXP(- 2105/T)

1.135 E+01

1.540 E+04  *EXP(-  792/T)

3.000 E+03  *EXP(   411/T)
1.856 E+01  *EXP(- 2633/T)

3.106 E+03  *EXP(   322/T)
1.200 E+04
2.500 E+02

6.100 E+04
3.250 E+04
2.000 E+04
9.040

4.400 E+04
                                          8.030  E-02   *EXP(-   500/T)

                                          2.453  E+04   *EXP(    116/T)
                                          2.600  E+04
                                          9.640
                                                             2.700 E+04
                                                             1.420 ฃ+05
                                                       1.800 E-02
                                                       4.700 E+02
                                                       1.200 E+04
                                                       2.550 E+01  *EXP(  1300/T)
                                                       1.000 E+03
                                                                 1.203  E+03

                                                                 1.371  E+05
                                                                 9.545  E+04
                                                                 2.200  E+04
5.920 E+03

4.200 E+04


1.800 E-02

1.135 E+01

1.080 E+03

1.192 E+04
2.700 E-03

9.150 E+03
1.200 E+04
2.500 E+02

6.100 E+04
3.250 E+04
2.000 E+04
9.040     xk38

4.400 E+04


1.500 E-02

3.620 E+04
2.600 E+04
9.640     xlc38


2.700 E+04


1.420 E+05
                                                                         1.800  E-02
                                                                         4.700  E+02
                                                                         1.200  E+04
                                                                         2.000  E+03
                                                                         1.000  E+03
            870<<8r a
            88097
            88151

-------
Uncertainty in the Chemistry Solution Routine

In most AQSMs, a number of new or updated chemistry solution techniques are cur-
rently being employed in conjunction with several chemical mechanisms.  The solu-
tion techniques include those used in the EPA Regional Oxidant Model (ROM), the
UAM, various versions of the California Air Resources Board's UAM, the SAI
Regional Oxidant Model (the RTM-III), and the Regional Acid Deposition Model
(RADM). Some new algorithms have also been suggested, but have not yet been
employed for atmospheric photochemical systems. Most people outside the modeling
field consider only the mechanism, assuming that the same mechanism implemented
with two different techniques should give identical predictions. Although this is the
ideal, it is not  the case. For a number of years, we have advocated comparison of
individual techniques, both with each other and with a reasonably accurate standard
solution method such as that of Gear. Comparisons with the Gear routine were
performed for  implementation of the CBM-IV in the UAM and should be performed
for all solution schemes currently implemented in complex chemistry AQSMs. To our
knowledge, this is rarely done (or at least rarely reported).

In the current  implementation of the CBM-IV, we utilized a modified Crank-Nichol-
son algorithm for the simultaneous solution of the differential equations that repre-
sent  each species. Because this algorithm utilizes both the rate of change for each
species and a Jacobian  matrix relating the changes in each  species to all others, the
technique can  be slow under certain conditions. However, it was chosen because,
when combined with our steady-state approximations, it calculates concentrations of
non-steady-state species that are very similar to those of the Gear algorithm (some
typical results of single-cell simulations with diurnally varying light are shown for a
few non-steady-state species in Figures 2-1 and 2-2).  Thus, we have sacrificed some
speed for more accurate predictions (at least in relation to Gear), but as discussed
later, we have devised some methods for regaining speed without the loss of accur-
acy.

Further research is required to implement  more efficient numerical integration
schemes for complex chemical mechanisms, such as the CB-IV, that will provide
computational speed as well accuracy that are comparable  to Gear's.  This research
should consider investigation into the speed and accuracy of as many solution
packages as possible in an effort  to (1) identify the state of the science regarding
speed and uncertainty,  (2) establish testing standards, and (3) weed out solution
packages that  do not respond well in the rather unique environment  of diurnally
varying atmospheric chemistry solutions. At the  least, we should verify that all the
major AQSMs can predict nearly  the same  results (similar to those of  Gear) for
simple and representative atmospheric tests. Most of the codes are in the public
domain and need not be tested in an Eulerian model.  For the CBM-IV  imple-
mentation, for instance, we used a trajectory model with five-layer vertical resolu-
tion  and a base in an Eulerian emissions grid for much of the comparison work (this
work could even  be performed with a single box model). Establishing, performing,
and reporting such a set of tests for other solution packages is in the best interest of
the general photochemical kinetics modeling community.
88151rl 5

-------
             O.9OO
                                            TIME (mln)
     FIGURE 2-1. NO,  N02 and 03 concentrations for Example 2 (sunset 1s at  680
     minutes);  lines are Gear simulation results and symbols are Crank-
     Nicholson  predictions.
88097
15

-------
                                           0.4         O.ซ
                                              fnMMOTMfc)
                                        •IMULAflON TlMt (ppfn)
0.8
                                            0.4

                                         SIMULATION TIME
                                                       O.C
                                                                   o.e
         FIGURE 2-2. OH concentrations (top)  and  H02 concentrations (bottom)  for
         Example 1 (sunset  1s  at 680 minutes);  lines are Gear  simulation results
         and  symbols are Crank-Nicholson predictions.
88097
                                               16

-------
Implementation of Speed Enhancement Procedures

Related to the solution algorithms are the approximations used to represent the
chemical features of a mechanism and, concurrently, to enhance the solution speed.
An explicit mechanistic representation of a chemical mechanism, which assumes few
or no steady-state approximations, provides a solution that most accurately accounts
for the mass of each species (provided numerical errors do not arise because of the
large range of concentration variation between species); however, this technique may
be computationally slower than is necessary.  The speed of a photochemical solution
can be improved in a number of ways without sacrificing accuracy.  As noted,
implementation of appropriate steady-state approximations is probably the best
known.  We have successfully utilized steady-state approximations in the Carbon-
Bond chemistry solution packages, and see no reason why at least a moderate set of
such calculations cannot be performed in all models requiring some improvements in
speed.

Recently, an algorithm that solves high-order steady-state relationships has been
successfully formulated. In this way, the fourth- and sometimes fifth-order alge-
braic solutions for the OH, €203, and HO2 radical species can be rapidly derived.
Results of our steady-state and Gear predictions are shown in Figures 2-3 through
2-6 for the conditions of the earlier non-steady-state examples. Since these simula-
tions were 24-hour tests with diurnally varying sunlight, the performance is shown to
be good for all parts of the day.  We caution, however, that steady-state approxima-
tions can be misleadingly simple.  Some aspects of their use, such as numerical
roundoff errors and mass balance considerations, must be  investigated carefully to
ensure confidence in implementation. As noted, we pay particular attention to
comparisons with the Gear predictions, proceeding through a number of different
test cases at each logical step of a steady-state approximation.

This type of analysis has recently led us toward another potential enhancement in
mechanism representation. One  of the most difficult and potentially stiff chemistry
loops is the NC^-NO^-^Oc-HNO^ cycle in which the  intermediate species (NOo and
^O^) are potential steady-state species (especially during the day), whereas NO^
and HNOj are necessarily non-steady-state compounds because of their high concen-
trations.  Under certain nighttime conditions, however, NO^ and N2O^ concentra-
tions can be relatively large, thus eliminating the possibility of steady-state treat-
ment.  The dilemma is that steady-state representation tends to cause nitrogen mass
to be artificially lost, while non-steady-state representation is still stiff in many cir-
cumstances.  We have recently tested a technique that allows us to move between
state and steady-state representations with the inclusion  of only one additional non-
steady-state species, which is  represented by the species  NXOY. This technique
ensures nitrogen mass balance, but allows steady-state representation when it is
preferable. Recent test results have been compared to those  of Gear for these con-
ditions (note that one of the earlier figures has rather high ozone concentrations at
 88 1 5Ipl 5


                                     17

-------
                2.tO

                2.40-


                2.20 -


                24)0 -


                14*0 -


             P  140 -
             I
            |0  1.40-

            *:  1.20 H


             I
                O.80 -

                o.ซo -

                O.40 -

                O.20 -
                0.00 -j
                                                                    I      I
                                0.2         0.4

                                        SIMULATIOM TIME (mln)
                                0.2
   0.4          0.ซ
      (nmtimmtd*)
SIUULXTION TIWC (mlo)
        FIGURE 2-3.OH concentrations  (top) and  H02 concentrations  (bottom)  for
        Example 2  (sunset  1s  at 680 minutes); lines are  Gear simulation results
        and symbols are Crank-Nicholson predictions.
88097
                                               18

-------
            f
            I.
                B.OO
                7.00 -
                •.00 -
                B.OO -
4.00 -
                1.00-
                2.00-
                1.00-
                          C203
                0.00
                               0.2
                                                                QJB
                                       •IMUL4TION TIME (fin)
          FIGURE 2-4.0203  concentrations for  Example 1 (sunset  1s  at  680 minutes);

          lines are Gear simulation results and  symbols are Crank-Nicholson

          predictions.
88097
                                             19

-------
               B.OO
            ~ 6.00 -
            hi

           I!
            I
                2.00-
                1.00-
               0.00
O.2
                                          0.4         0.ซ
                                            (ThouKwufc)
                                       SIMUUCTION TIMC
                                  O.B
         FIGURE 2-5.C203  concentrations for  Example 2  (sunset 1s at 680 minutes);
         lines are Gear simulation results and symbols  are Crank-Nicholson

         predictions.
88097
               20

-------
            O-ODO20
                             0.2
                                     SIMULATION TIME (ppm)
             O.OO20 -
             0.0010 -
             0.0000
       FIGURE 2-6.N03 concentrations  (top)  and N205 concentrations (bottom) for
       Example  1  (sunset 1s at 680 minutes);  lines are Gear  simulation results
       and symbols are Crank-Nicholson  predictions.
88097
                                           21

-------
sunset) and are shown in Figure 2-7. We are now considering this technique for the
SC>2 oxidation cycle, which will be better served with a "guaranteed" sulfur balance.


Photolysis Rate Calculations

There are fundamental differences in the representations of photolysis rate expres-
sions in CB-II and CB-IV.  In the CB-H all photolysis reaction rates are calculated via
a direct porportionality relationship with the NO2 photolysis reaction rate. How-
ever, other photolysis reactions (e.g., ozone, formaldehyde, and higher aldehyde
photolysis rates) are activated at spectrums of ultraviolet radiation  different from
those of NC>2. Thus CB-IV requires separate photolysis reaction rates for NO2,
formaldehyde, higher aldehydes, and ozone. Thus, on the basis of  the input NO2
photolysis rate, the UAM (CB-IV) calculates the solar zenith  angle required to
produce the NO2 photolysis rates and then calculates the photolysis  rates for the
other photolytic reactions on the basis of the intensity of the solar radiation.
88151rl  5
                                      22

-------
      3  PREPARATION OF UAM INPUTS FOR NEW YORK AND ST. LOUIS
An important component of the PLANR use of the UAM is consistency in the proce-
dures used to prepare model inputs. Procedures to be followed in preparing UAM
inputs with limited data availability must be developed and clearly stated. When
there is a lack of data, there must be recommended procedures to be used.  The
preprocessor programs supplied with the 1978-1980 version of the UAM rely on
intensive measurement program; data are interpolated from these measurements to
obtain gridded fields of input parameters required by the UAM. Over the last 10
years, many of these programs have been outdated. More recent applications of the
UAM have prepared input files using only routinely available meteorological and air
quality data (Hogo, Mahoney, and Yocke, 1988). However, the procedures used for
input preparation have been developed on a case-by-case basis and are tailored to
data availability.

In this section we discuss how the meteorological, air quality, and terrain inputs were
prepared for the New York and St. Louis UAM modeling episodes.  However, time
constraints did not permit identification of ozone episodes or development of  addi-
tional modeling data bases for this project. Instead, ozone  episodes that had been
previously modeled for St. Louis and New York were used for this study.  When data
from the original studies were deemed suitable for the current application, they were
used without change. However, changes and additions to the data were made  to
allow use of the Carbon-Bond-IV Mechanism, to extend the time span of the simula-
tions, to alter the definition of the modeling grid, and to improve the quality of the
input data using current input preparation procedures.

Although this study makes use of previously developed UAM inputs as a basis for the
New York and St. Louis modeling data bases, the general procedures should be
viewed as a starting point for development of a consistent UAM input preparation
methodology for the PLANR use of the UAM. The reader is again cautioned that
these two applications of UAM are not  true PLANR uses because of the use of
nonroutine  data. Moreover, for New York in particular, this study has indicated the
area is not  amenable to PLANR because of the large amounts of transported
pollutants and the complex land-sea meteorology.
 8 8151r 2  1 0                              23

-------
REGIONTOP
UAM INPUT REQUIREMENTS

The following 13 input files are required for UAM modeling analyses:

DIFFBREAK    This file contains the daytime mixing height or nighttime inversion
               height for each column of cells at the beginning and end .of each hour
               of the simulation.

               This file contains the height of each column of cells at the beginning
               and end of each hour of the simulation. If this height is greater than
               the mixing height, the cell or cells above  the mixing height are
               assumed to be within an inversion.

               This file contains the x and y components of the wind velocity for
               every grid cell for each hour of the simulation.  Also the maximum
               wind speed for the entire grid and average wind speeds at  each boun-
               dary for each hour are  included in this file.

METSCALARS  This file contains the hourly values of the meteorological  parameters
               that do not vary spatially. These scalars  are the NC>2 photolysis rate
               constant, the concentration of water vapor, the temperature gradi-
               ent above and below the inversion base, the atmospheric pressure,
               and the exposure class.
WIND
AIRQUALITY
BOUNDARY
TOPCONC
               This file contains the initial concentrations of each species for each
               grid cell at the start of the simulation.

               This file contains the location of the modeling region boundaries.
               This file also contains the concentration of each species that is used
               as the boundary condition along each boundary segment at each
               vertical level.

               This file contains the concentration of each species for the area
               above the modeling region.  These concentrations are the boundary
               conditions for vertical integration.
TEMPERATUR This file contains the hourly temperature for each surface layer grid
               cell.
 EMISSIONS
 PTSOURCE
               This file contains the ground-level emissions of NO, NO2> seven car-
               bon-bond categories, and CO for each grid square for each hour of
               the simulation.

               This file contains the point source information, including the stack
               height, temperature and flow rate, the plume rise, the grid cell into
               which the emissions are emitted, and the emissions rates for NO,
               NO2ป seven carbon-bond categories, and CO for each point source for
               each hour.
 88151r2 10
                                          24

-------
TERRAIN      This file contains the value of the surface roughness and deposition
               factor for each grid square.

CHEMPARAM  This file contains information regarding the chemical species to be
               simulated including reaction rate constants, upper and lower bounds,
               activation energy, and reference temperature.

SIMCONTROL  This file contains the simulation control information such as the time
               of the simulation, file option information, default information, and
               information on integration and chemistry time steps.
WIND FIELD PREPARATION PROCEDURE

One of the most important UAM inputs is the wind field. A key component in the
PLANR use of the UAM will be use of a new diagnostic wind model developed by Sys-
tems Applications, Inc. for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This model
was originally developed to simulate airflow over data-sparse regions of complex ter-
rain (Morris et ai., 1987, 1988).

Hourly gridded wind fields were generated for St.  Louis (13 July 1976) and New York
(07 - 08 August 1980) using the Systems Applications' Diagnostic Wind Model
(Douglas and  Kessler, 1988). This model incorporates local surface and upper-air
observations, where available, and provides some information on terrain-induced air-
flow in regions where local observations are unavailable. The diagnostic wind model
is formulated in terrain-parallel coordinates.  Generation of a wind field using the
diagnostic wind model is a two-step procedure.

In Step 1, a domain-mean wind, which is obtained from a representative upper-air
observation, is adjusted for terrain effects. These include the kinematic effects of
terrain (the lifting and  acceleration of the airflow over terrain obstacles), thermo-
dynamicaily generated  slope flows, and blocking effects. Step 1 produces a spatially
varying gridded field of u and v for each vertical layer within the model domain.

In Step 2, observational information is added to the Step 1 (u,v) field. An objective
analysis procedure is applied in which the observations are utilized within a user-
specified radius of influence while the Step 1 (u,v) field dominates in subregions
where observations are unavailable. The objective analysis procedure consists of the
following four substeps: (1) interpolation, (2) smoothing of the analyzed field, (3)
computation  of a vertical-velocity field, and (4) minimization of the three-dimen-
sional divergence. The following modified inverse-distance-squared weighting
scheme (Ross and Smith, 1986) is used for the interpolation:

              (u,v)' = {sumk[rk"2(u0,v0)k] + R"2(u,v)1}/{sumkrk"2 + R~2}
88151r2  10                               25

-------
where (UO,VQ)J< denotes an observed wind at station k, r^ is the distance from station
k to a given grid point, (u,v)| is the Step 1  wind field at this grid point, and (u,v)' is
the updated wind vector. The parameter R controls the relative influence of the
observations and the Step 1 wind field.

Following the interpolation, a five-point smoother is applied to the analyzed wind
field to reduce discontinuities that may result from  the interpolation.  An initial
vertical velocity, W, is calculated from (u,v)' by integrating the incompressible con-
servation-of-mass equation. It has been noted (Godden and  Lurmann, 1983)  that
vertical velocities obtained from an objectively anlayzed  field may be unrealistically
large near the top of the domain.  In the diagnostic wind model, W is modified using
a procedure suggested by O'Brien (1970):

                        W2(Z) = WKZ) - 
-------
of slower-reacting hydrocarbon species, such as those produced by ethanol-blended
fuels, on peak ozone concentrations. Inputs were created for the hours preceding
0400 LSI on 8 August and 7 August.

The modeling was performed on the original OMNYMAP (Rao,  1987) modeling grid,
which consists of 31 by 25 grid cells with a horizontal dimension of 8 km, covering an
area 248 by 200 km.  The location of this grid and its relation to other northeastern
states is presented in Figure 3-1.  It covers parts of New Jersey, New York, and Con-
necticut. The grid is located in UTM zone 18, with the origin set at 520,000. m
Easting and 446,000. m Northing.

The original vertical structure of the DAM in the OMNYMAP study contained four
vertical cells that were constrained to three below and one above the hourly mixing
height.  Vertical layers above the mixing height that are allowed to become very
thick during certain simulation hours may result in inadequate  vertical resolution.
Under certain conditions, especially during nighttime hours when mixing heights are
low, pollutants from large point sources that are emitted aloft may be artificially
dispersed in such thick  layers.  Also, with thick layers, the wind speed and direction,
and vertical and horizontal shear above the mixing height may not  be appropriately
resolved. To adequately resolve the vertical structure, modeling with as many as
eight vertical layers might be desirable but might also be computationally
impractical. To provide a balance between practicality and appropriate vertical
resolution, we used a. new vertical grid structure consisting of  five vertical cells,
with two below and three above the hourly mixing height.  The heights of the vertical
layers varied in thickness spatially and temporally depending on the hourly mixing
height field. The  minimum thickness of the lower cells was 50 m, and the minimum
thickness of the upper cells was 150 m.

Much of the data used in the previous OMNYMAP application of UAM for 8 August
was used "as is" in this  application. However, certain of the files (e.g., WINDS and
BOUNDARY) were recreated using new techniques, and one new file (TERRAIN) was
added.  In the original OMNYMAP application, spatially constant default deposition
and surface roughness parameters were used in place of spatially varying
parameters. The new TERRAIN file contains updated spatially varying parameters
based on land use  data.  Because of the changes in the vertical layer structure for
the new UAM modeling, those files affected by this change were also recreated.

The procedures for preparing each of the  input files for the New York application are
described below.  Some data files  for New York were taken from the previous
OMNYMAP application. However, in order to begin the simulation at 1200 LST on 7
August 1980, data files were created for 7 August. In addition, some data files for 8
August were revised.
 88151r2  10                               27

-------
Meteorological Inputs

DIFFBREAK

Mixing heights for 8 August were retained from the OMNYMAP application.  Mixing
heights for 7 August were derived from the soundings at John F. Kennedy (JFK) Air-
port and Albany using an objective method described by Kelley (1981). The mixing
heights varied hourly but were spatially constant for 7 and 8 August.

For the time period from 1200 LSI on 7 August to 0400 LSI on  8 August, new data
were prepared.  Twice-daily soundings at  Albany, New York, and OFK Airport
provided information on the vertical structure of the atmosphere in the modeling
region. Surface temperatures at Albany and La Guardia were needed to determine
the temporal  variation of the mixing heights. Mixing heights were determined from
these data using a computerized analysis  method described by Kelley (1981).  Data
for the time period, after the last sounding on the 7th were set to the same value as
at 0400 LSI on the 8th. DIFFBREAK values are listed below:

    Date       Time (EST)	Height of DIFFBREAK (meters)
    7 August      1200                        1700.
                  1300                        1700.
                  1600                        1700.
                  1700                        1380.
                  1800                        1080.
                  1900                        800.
                  2000                        610.
                  2100                        430.
                  2200                        360.
                  2300                        345.

    8 August      0000                        345.
                  0600                        345.
                  0700                        375.
                  0800                        405.
                  0900                        450.
                  1000                        540.
                  1100                        700.
                  1200                        1020.
                  1300                        1400.
                  1400                        1400.
                  1500                        1400.
                  1600                        1400.
                  1700                        1170.
                  1800                        940.
                  1900                        710.
                  2000                        710.

-------
REGIONTOP

The top of the modeling region was set to a constant value of 1500 meters above
ground level.  This value is 100 meters above the maximum mixing height on 8
August. Specifying a higher value may result in articifical dilution of emissions from
elevated point sources.  If a temporally varying region top is used that rises with the
mixing height, as was used in the OMNYMAP study, emissions from elevated point
sources whose plume rise exceeds the region top may be lost from the modeling
domain.
METSCALARS

METSCALARS data for 8 August were left mostly unchanged from those used in the
OMNYMAP study.  Radiation factors were recalculated for the Carbon-Bond IV
Mechanism by using the procedures described by Schere and Demerjian (1977) and
actinic flux data collected by Bass and co-workers (1980) (see Gery, Whitten, and
Killus, 1988). A few values of the  temperature gradient below the inversion were
altered from values greater than -.01 degrees K/meter to -.01 degrees K/meter to
make them more consistent with the high radiation intensity found at the same time.
Other METSCALARS data were created for 7 August by using data from the
corresponding hour on the 8th.  Gaps in the data (i.e., 2000 to 0400) were filled in by
linearly interpolating the data on either side of the gap.  The exposure class,
however, was not interpolated, but rather  was set to -2 for these nighttime hours.
TEMPERATUR

Surface temperature data from the OMNYMAP application were used for 8 August
1980. Data for corresponding hours of 8 August were used for 7 August.  Missing
hours were linearly interpolated.
WIND

Three surface stations within the New York modeling domain provided hourly obser-
vations of wind speed and wind direction for the 7 and 8 August modeling period.
The stations located at La Guardia Airport in New York City and at Bridgeport and
Hartford in Connecticut are plotted in Figure 3-1.  Twice-daily upper-air observa-
tions were available from radiosondes located at JFK Airport in New York City and
Albany, New York. The upper-air observations were vertically interpolated to the
diagnostic wind model layers and temporally interpolated so that data were available
for each hourly analysis.  The diagnostic wind model was exercised using 14 vertical
layers with interfaces at 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600,  750, 900, 1050,
1200, 1350, and 1500 m agl. A maximum radius of influence of 40 km was used at
the surface, and 150 km was used aloft.  The weighting parameter for the  terrain
effects was specified as 20 km.

38151  10

                                    29

-------
                                                                           E
                                 1S3M
88151
                                      30

-------
The diagnostic wind model fields were interpolated to the four UAM layers and the
CVBrien-Cressman vertical-velocity-adjustment procedure was applied to reduce the
vertical velocity at the top of the modeling domain.

Table 3-1 compares the wind fields for 8 August 1980 used in this study and those
used in the OMNYMAP study. The OMNYMAP study used horizontally and vertically
spatially constant winds.  The average mixed-layer and aloft-layer winds used in this
study are displayed in Table 3-1, along with the variability (i.e., maximum and
minimum wind speeds and directions). In this study, these wind fields have a more
westerly wind component in the afternoon of 8 August, which results in the highest
ozone concentrations being located in the middle of Long Island Sound rather than
along the southern coast of Connecticut as predicted in the OMNYMAP study.
Air Quality Inputs

The UAM requires specification of hourly values of initial and boundary concentra-
tions for each species in the CB-IV mechanism.
AIRQUALITY

No hydrocarbon measurements and very few NOX measurements were available at
1200 on 7 August 1980. A tracer simulation revealed that initial pollutants were
transported out of the modeling region by 0600 on 8 August.  Therefore initial con-
centrations would not influence the formation of ozone on that date.  Given the time
constraints and lack of representative observations, initial conditions data from the
OMNYMAP study (0400; 8/8/80) were used to initialize the model on 7 August.  The
OMNYMAP hydrocarbon species were resplit for the Carbon-Bond-IV Mechanism as
shown in Table 3-2.
BOUNDARY

Boundary conditions near the south, west and north boundaries were determined from
station measurements in the neighborhood of these boundaries. The eastern boundary
and the eastern portions of the south and north boundaries were assigned relatively
clean values.  Hydrocarbon species were split for the Carbon-Bond-IV Mechanism as
shown in Table 3-3.  Concentrations on the lateral boundaries of the modeling region
are of considerable importance to the model results and were based on measurements
when available. For NO2, NO, and ozone, measurements within and near the boun-
daries of the OMNYMAP region were available from the Storage and Retrieval Of
Aerometric Data (SAROAD) base. In addition, hydrocarbon measurements for
several sites in New Jersey and New York were available from the NECRMP study
88 15 lrl  10
                                   31

-------
              a.  •-
              
-*  >

S  s
0]  r-H
3  (0
    xH
01  4->

ง  a.
*->  01
S
    0]
    Q)
    0]
    3  *-*
•o
    >.  01
T3  tJ   Q)
 C  3   3
•H  JJ  rH
 3  0}     01  
    C T3
son
s
ed

se
Compar

those us

renthe
pa
                I   C  -H
               CO  Cd
                      01
               U  >, Q)

               B^?5
               ซ* x>  
                         O
                        •H
                     T3 4J
                     c  o
                     -H  V
                     2  l-
(1)
OJ
o.--^
CO  01

•D  ^
                                 X
    c
    o
    •H
T3  -t->
 C  O

                      IV
                      ex
                     CO

                     "O  •—'
Wind

Direction
                                •a  co  01
                                 c  m=r'—   c\i
                                              ซ-c\jc\jc\jc\jc\Jooc\jc\iซ-'-ซ-ocr>O'\c^aocoooco
                                              cocncococomcncncnmcncococviCM   CNJCMCNJ   ro   CM
           5   8
                    o   o
                                                          cr>crvocotnir>
                                ซ—   "—  ป-ซ-ซ—  CM   CM   •—  ซ—   ซ—   O  O   (Ti  CO   CO   CO   C—  LTivOvO
                                COCOCOcOcnOOCOCOOncOCOCOCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                              r~cocoa>
                              •—  CM   CO   CM

                              o  o   o   o
                                                                                                 CO
                                                                                                               00  00   CO  CO
                                                                                    GO  OO


                                                                                    i-  CO


                                                                                        CO   O   CTS  CO   C**   ^—  CO  ^"   CM  ZT   U^

                                                                                        vovotnLOunmLTiLninLnLn
                                                   co   CM
                                                                                    ป-   in  =r   coco
COCOCOOOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCM  CM   CM   CM  CM   CM   CM
vO   	

 ..   vovovovoc—t-C'-t^cocMcococMcocococo^rin
CnCMCMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMfMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                oซ—   oo\oซ-ซ—   ซ—'—'—   r^cot—   ^-^ov^mtnvovo
                                COCOCOCMCOCOCOCOCOCOCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                               O-—   •—
                                                                 CMOJCMCOCMCM'—   ป-CMCOCOCMCOCMCOCO
                                                                                o   cri   co  c—

                                                                                in   co   co  CM
                                                                                                  OC—  COLTivJ3ซ—
                                                    aZ
                                                             f-vฃ>  ซ—   if   ซ—  CM   t—  CO  COlTivDvO^-   inCTi^-
                                                             cMcoirircococncocororocopo^-cocM
                                                             CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
                                                                                                                                        CM
                                                                         32

-------
            TABLE 3-2.  Respeciation of initial concentrations  and
            emissions of hydrocarbons.

            CBM-IV Species          As a Function of CBM-II  Species

                 OLE                OLE
                 PAR                PAR - ARO * 0.432  -  ARO  * 2 * 0.568
                 TOL                ARO * 0.432
                 XYL                ARO * 0.568
                 FORM               GARB * 0.288
                 ALD2               CARB * 0.712
                 ETH                ETH
                 CRES               1 X 10~6 ppm
                 MGLY               1 X 10~6 ppm
                 OPEN               1 X 10~6 ppm
88151  11
                                  33

-------
            TABLE 3-3.  Respeciation of boundary concentrations
            of hydrocarbons.
CBM-IV Species
OLE
PAR
TOL
XYL
FORM
ALD2
ETH
CRES
MGLY
OPEN
As a Function of CBM-II Species
RHC * 0.027/2
RHC * 0.685
RHC ป 0.058/7
RHC * 0.036/8
RHC * 0.096
RHC ป 0.051/2
RHC ป 0.047/2
1 X 10~6 ppm
1 X 10'6 ppm
1 X 10~6 ppm
            where  RHC  =  2  ป ETH + 2 * OLE +  PAR + CARB +  6  *  ARO.
88 1 5 lr1  11

                                  34

-------
(PEDCo Environmental, Inc., 1980). In utilizing these measurements, the boundary of
the modeling domain was divided into three sectors:

     The Southwest sector - the southern half of the west boundary and the western
     half of the south boundary.

     The Northwest sector - the northern half of the west boundary and the western
     half of the north boundary.

     The East sector - the remainder of the region boundary, including the eastern
     halves of the north and south boundaries and  the east boundary.

The Southwest sector is the most important in the  New York simulation since it is
more frequently an inflow boundary than are the other boundaries.  Also, the concen-
trations that occur near this boundary are higher than those that occur near the
other sectors, probably because of the presence of  several major metropolitan areas
upwind. The East sector is the least important since it is seldom an inflow boundary
on either 7  or 8 August.

In the portion of the region below the height of the mixing height, the values of the
species were based on average surface measurements near the appropriate sector, as
described below. The concentrations above the height of the mixing height were set
to the values in the TOPCONC file, which is discussed later in this section.
     and NO surface concentrations in the Southwest sector were based on measure-
ments at Flemington, Phillipsburg, New Brunswick, and Monmouth, NJ. For each
hour of the day, each cell in the sector was set to the average of the measurements
at these sites. This resulted in boundary NOX concentrations of approximately 60
ppb at night and 30 ppb during the day for the  southwest corner of the modeling
domain. Similarly, ozone was set to the average of measurements at Flemington,
Trenton, Monmouth, and Plainfield, NJ.  Hydrocarbon measurements in New Bruns-
wick, Linden, Newark, and Bayonne, NJ show rather severe fluctuations during the
course of the modeled days, and therefore the  boundary values for HC were not
assigned hourly values based on these measurements. Instead, an estimate of  the
daily average at these stations during daytime (650 ppbc) was used.  Since all  of
these stations show somewhat elevated hydrocarbon values during nighttime hours,
1,050 ppbc was used after sunset.  Considerably higher values for hydrocarbons could
possibly be justified at some hours based on the measured values; however, these
boundary concentrations are quite high already, and higher values could cause exces-
sive amounts  of material to be transported into the region. Surface hydrocarbon
measurements tend to overestimate the mixed-layer average hydrocarbon concentra-
tions represented by the boundary conditions.  Therefore, the  very highest hydrocar-
bon measurements were not deemed appropriate and consequently not used in pre-
scription of the boundary conditions.
88 151rl  10

                                   35

-------
Table 3-4 compares southwest corner (10 grid cells in the east and north direction
from the southwest corner) mixed-layer average VOC and NOX boundary conditions
for the OMNYMAP 1988 Scope Base Case and this study's 1980 and 1995 boundary
conditions. The OMNYMAP 1988 boundary conditions were obtained from the base
year (1980) boundary conditions by reducing the VOC and NOX boundary concentra-
tions by 40 and 20 percent, respectively. Thus, the OMNYMAP 1980 VOC boundary
conditions for the Southwest region were approximately twice that used in this
study.  During the early morning (before 7:00 a.m.) this study used slightly higher
NOX boundary conditions than those used in the 1980 OMNYMAP UAM simulations.
However, after around 9:00 a.m., the 1980 OMNYMAP NOX boundary conditions were
about the same as those used in this study.

For the Northwest sector, NO and NO2 at each hour were based on measurements  at
Syracuse, NY and Hartford, CT. Ozone for  this sector was assigned hour by hour
based on measurements at Poughkeepsie and Syracuse, NY and Hartford and Litch-
f ield, CT.  No hydrocarbon measurements were available in the vicinity of the
Northwest sector of the boundary, so the hydrocarbon values on this boundary were
taken to be two-thirds of the values in the Southwest sector (based on the relative
magnitude of the NOX measurements near the two sectors).  Thus, 200 ppbc was used
in the daytime, and 333 ppbc was used at night.

In the East sector, which is bounded by ocean and is almost always an outflow boun-
dary, constant values were used for  the entire run.  Ozone was set to the clean value
of 40 ppb, and Nฉ2 and NO were set to 6 ppb and 3 ppb, respectively.  Hydrocarbons
were set to 30 ppb. Tracer runs show that the model results will not be significantly
affected by concentrations in this sector of the boundary.
TOPCONC

Concentrations at the top of the modeling region were set to clean values based on
aircraft spiral measurements taken in New Jersey on the modeled days.  Concentra-
tions at the top of the modeling region were revised for the entire span of the run
because of the change in values in the REGIONTOP file from the values used in the
OMNYMAP study.  Although the fixed top of the region and the divergence minimi-
zation technique utilizied in preparing the wind field virtually eliminate the effects
of the top boundary concentrations on model results, it was still appropriate to use
the lower concentration values typically found at  1500 meters. Aircraft spirals in
New York City on 7 and 8 August from the NECRMP study show very low values  for
NOX at 1500 meters, sometimes less than  1 ppb but usually nearer 10 ppb. There-
fore, 9 ppb was used for the top boundary concentration of NOX, split two-thirds  NO2
and one-third NO.  Ozone measurements in the spirals hovered a little above 5 pphm;
hence  we retained the value of 5.6 pphm for the ozone top boundary concentration.
No hydrocarbon measurements were available  from the spirals, so the OMNYMAP
hydrocarbon value of 28 ppbC was retained.  This  hydrocarbon value was resplit
according to the formula in Table 3-3 to obtain Carbon-Bond-IV species.
 88151r2 10
                                        36

-------
  TABLE 3-4.  Comparison of 1980 and 1995 mixed-layer south-
  western boundary conditions used in this study and the mixed-
  layer southwestern boundary conditions used in the OMNYMAP
  1988 Scope Base Case for 8 August 1980.
VOC Boundary Conditions
(ppbc)
Hour
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
OMNYMAP
1988 Scope
Base Case
NA
NA
NA
1,239
1,224
1,163
967
904
811
999
946
1,006
1,067
1,127
1,119
1,158
1,188
1,369
976
NA
This Study
1980
1,051
1,051
1,051
1,051
1,051
1,051
1,051
1,051
631
631
631
631
631
631
631
631
631
631
631
1,051
1995
646
646
646
646
646
646
646
646
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
394
646
NOX Boundary Conditions
(ppb)
OMNYMAP
1988 Scope
Base Case
NA
NA
NA
25
27
37
30
35
34
37
38
38
30
35
30
33
30
29
30
NA
This Study
1980
50
48
50
52
60
80
62
72
58
42
34
32
26
36
44
42
42
46
64
62
1995
38
29
30
31
36
48
37
43
35
25
20
19
16
22
26
25
25
28
38
37
8815 IF 1
                                   37

-------
Terrain Inputs

TERRAIN

Dominant land use in each grid cell of the New York modeling region was estimated
from USGS 1:250000 scale maps.  Cells were categorized as urban, deciduous forest,
agricultural or range  land, or water.  Surface roughness and vegetation factors were
derived from the values given by a recent Argonne National Laboratory study listed
in Table 3-5.
Existing Emissions Data

An emissions inventory for the UAM(CB-IV) was obtained from the emissions inven-
tory used for the OMNYMAP application of the UAM(CB-II) for the 1988 SCOPE base
case.  Hydrocarbon species from the OMNYMAP application were resplit according
to the formulas given in Table 3-2.  The 1980 OMNYMAP emissions inventory was
not available in time to be used in the model evaluation exercise; therefore, the
OMNYMAP  1988 Scope Base Case inventory had to be used in the model evaluation
study.  The 1988 inventory contained approximately 32 and 14 percent less VOC and
NOX emissions, respectively.
ST. LOUIS APPLICATION

Time constraints did not permit identification of a new episode for St. Louis PLANR
yse of the UAM. Instead, an episode was chosen from the 20 St. Louis ozone episodes
prepared by the EPA as part of the St. Louis Ozone Modeling Project (Schere and
Shreffler, 1982; Cole et al., 1983).  A preliminary analysis of these 20 St. Louis UAM
episodes identified four possible candidate days for this project.  On the basis of
objective selection requirements discussed in Appendix C, the  13 July 1976 ozone
episode day was selected for application of the UAM (CB-IV).

Many of the data files for St. Louis were taken from the previous EPA application
(Schere and Shreffler, 1982). Tracer runs had shown that significant initial material
was still retained within the region at mid-morning if the simulation was begun at
0300 LST.  We therefore decided to push the beginning of the run back to 0000
hours.  In order to begin the simulation at 0000 hours on 13  July 1976, data from
0500-0600 LST were used for prior  hours.  Information on individual data files fol-
lows.
 88 151rl  10

                                     38

-------
              TABLE 3-5.  Surface roughness and deposition factors
              based on studies by Argonne National Laboratories.

                   Land Use         Surface Roughness   Deposition
                   Category             (meters)          Factor

              Urban                     3.00               0.2
              Agricultural              0.25               0.5
              Range                     0.05               0.4
              Deciduous Forest          1.00               0.4
              Coniferous Forest         1.00               0.3
                including wetland
              Mixed Forest              1.00               0.3
              Water                     0.0001             0.03
              Barren land               0.002              0.2
              Nonforest Wetlands        0.15               0.3
              Mixed Agricultural        0.10               0.5
                and range
              Rocky (low shrubs)        0.10               0.3
88 151r 1  11

                                   39

-------
Meteorological and Surface Characteristics Files

DIFFBREAK

Values in this file remain unchanged from the previous EPA application. The proce-
dures used to generate mixing heights are described in Schere and Shreffler (1982).


REGIONTOP

The top of the modeling region was set to a constant value of 1600 meters for the
entire run.  This is a higher region top than that used in the previous EPA study and
thus will (1) retain more emitted pollutants (such as from elevated point sources)
within the modeling region, and (2) reduce the influence of the boundary top concen-
trations on model results.


METSCALARS

Values established in the EPA application were retained with the exception of the
Nฉ2 photolysis rates (radfactor) and temperature gradient above the mixing height
(tgradabove).  Radiation factors were recalculated for the Carbon-Bond-IV
Mechanism according to the procedures developed by Schere and Demerjian (1977).
Temperature gradients above the inversion base included positive values charac-
teristic of the gradient within the inversion.  Because of the new definition of the
top of the modeling region, positive values of this gradient were reduced to zero to
better reflect the new averaging depth.


TEMPERATUR

Surface temperature data from the EPA application were used.
WIND

A dense surface monitoring network from the RAPS network consisting of 25 stations
provided hourly observations of wind speed and wind direction for the 13 July 1976
simulation.  The locations of the surface stations are shown in Figure 3-2. A radio-
sonde located just north of the eastern boundary of the domain provided hourly
upper-air observations with approximately 100 m vertical resolution.  These observa-
tions were vertically averaged within the diagnostic wind model layers. The diag-
nostic model was exercised using 13 vertical layers with interfaces at 0, 50, 100, 150,
200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 1000,  1200, 1400, and 1600 m agl. A maximum radius of
influence of 20 km was used in the surface layer, and 200 km was used aloft. The
weighting parameter for  the terrain effects was 10 km.
 88 15 IT 1  10

                                      40

-------
FIGURE 3-2.  The St. Louis area with locations of the RAPS surface stations and
4 x 4 km modeling grid superimposed.  (Source:  Cole et al., 1983)
                                              41

-------
Postprocessing of the model output consisted of interpolating the diagnostic wind
model fields to the five spatially and temporally varying UAM layers.
Initial and Boundary Concentration Files

AIRQUALITY, BOUNDARY, and TOPCONC

Hydrocarbon species from the EPA UAM application were resplit according to the
formula given in Tables 3-2 and 3-3.


Terrain Inputs

TERRAIN

Surface roughness and vegetation factors from the EPA UAM application were scaled
to make them agree with the recent Argonne National Laboratory measurements.
The relative values used in older studies are compared with the Argonne recommen-
dations in Table 3-6. Since the magnitudes of the surface roughness values are com-
parable, the change made was to set a minimum value of 0.0001 m.  The deposition
factors differ considerably and were therefore recalculated as follows. First a
minimum of 0.03 was set.  Values in the range 0.03 to 0.2 were  left unchanged.  For
values greater than 0.2, the value was recalculated by the equation


               new value = (ol,d value - 0.2) #  (Q>5 _ Q>2) + Q>2
                            (1.0 - 0.2)
 Existing Emissions Files

 EMISSIONS and PTSOURCE

 Hydrocarbon species from the EPA application were resplit according to the formula
 given in Table 3-2.  Other values were used without change.


 PROJECTION OF INITIAL AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS TO 1995

 For the purposes of future year (1995) modeling, adjustments in initial and boundary
 concentrations were projected to occur in proportion to estimated changes in air
 quality from the original modeled year (1976 for St. Louis and 1980 for New York) to
 the 1995 emissions.  Since more than one basic emission inventory was involved, it
 was not possible to simply apply the ratio of emissions totals in 1995 to the totals in
 8815 l  1 10
                                      42

-------
              TABLE  3-6.   Comparison  of circa  '78  and  current  surface
              roughness and  vegetation  factors.
Land Use
Category
Water
Brush
Forest
Populated
Densely populated
Circa '78
Roughness (m)
0.00001
0.2
2.8
1.75
3.2
Argonne Lab. Study
Roughness (m)a
0.0001
0.1b
1.0
—
3.0
Land Use
Category
Water
Brush
Forest
Populated
Densely populated
a Hogo et al. (1987)
b Value is for mixed
Circa '78
Vegetation
Factor
0.0
1.0
1.5
0.5
0.2
agricultural
Argonne Lab Study
Vegetation Factor3
0.03
0.5B
0.4
0.2
and range land.
881 Sip 1  11
                                   43

-------
the original emission inventories.  First of all there are several scenarios in 1995
with differing emissions totals.  Second, the original inventories and the 1985 inven-
tories (from which the 1995 inventories are projected) are based on different raw
data. Third, the 1995 inventories include estimates of running losses, whereas the
earlier inventories do not. Fourth, the New York 1980 inventory was not available.
To address these discrepancies, we elected to use the following procedures.

Consensus among all EPA participants was to use only one set of initial and boundary
conditions for all 1995 emission scenarios. For New York this is an especially
important factor limiting the results because the effects of changes in emissions of
the different emission scenarios were not reflected in the long-range transport of
pollutants, which have a major impact on the area's air quality.  The 1995 initial and
boundary conditions were to be compatible with the 1995 scenario #1  emissions (see
Section 4). To avoid making a faulty projection based on the intercomparison of
disparate emissions inventories, a projection factor from 1976 (or  1980 for New
York) to 1995 was estimated by a two-step process.  The first step was to develop
projection factors from  1976 (or 1980 for New York) to 1985 based on changes in
measured air quality from the national air quality trends for VOC, NOX and CO
(EPA, 1985b). The second step  was to develop another set of projection factors from
1985 to 1995. For NOX and CO the second projection factor from 1985 to  1995 was
based on the ratio of the 1995 (scenario #1) emission totals  to the 1985 NAPAP
emissions inventory totals. Because the 1995 inventory  includes running losses of
hydrocarbons and the 1985 inventory does not, simply using  the ratio of the
hydrocarbon totals in the two inventories is not an appropriate means of obtaining
the projection factor for this species.  Instead, VOC projection factors were obtained
from E. H. Pechan and Associates (Pechan, 1988) that were developed by the Bureau
of Economic Analysis.  These factors indicated an approximate VOC emission change
consisting of 35 percent and 25 percent reductions in hydrocarbon for New York and
St. Louis, respectively.  These factors are appropriate for boundary conditions  in
New York since projected emission changes in cities upwind of New York are similar
to those in New York, according to E. H. Pechan and Associates (1988).  The
resulting factors are tabulated  in Tables 3-7 and 3-8 (Pechan, 1988).

These reductions were not applied to the entire concentration to obtain the 1995
levels.  Instead, a global background value considered not to be due to emissions was
first subtracted and the projection factor applied to the remainder. The background
value was then added back to obtain the 1995 concentration. The following formula
describes the projection, where N is the new concentration  (1995), F is the net reduc-
tion factor from Tables 3-7 or 3-8, O is the old concentration (1976 or 1980), and B is
the background value:

                              N = F*(O - B) + B   .

If a  value of O was less than B, then N was set equal to O.
 88151p2 10
                                         44

-------
         TABLE  3-7.   Initial  and  boundary  condition  projection
         factors  (St.  Louis).
         Species
  Reduction
(1976 to 1985)
  (percent)
  Reduction
(1985 to 1995)
  (percent)
   Net
Reduction
(percent)
         VOC

         NOx

         CO
     12

      3

     22
     25

     24

     54
   34

   26

   64
         TABLE 3-8.   Initial and boundary condition projection
         factors (New York).
Species
VOC
NOx
CO
Reduction
(1980 to 1985)
(percent)
8
3
12
Reduction
(1985 to 1995)
(percent)
35
39
52
Net
Reduction
(percent)
40
41
58
88151rl
                                   45

-------
Background values for each species were estimated from several sources. Tropo-
spheric ozone estimates by Logan (1985) indicate that W ppb is a reasonable back-
ground in mid-summer. Fehsenfeld and co-workers (1988) have published values for
NOX at several locations around the world. A typical NOX value for the continental
United States is 0.5 ppb, which was then split two-thirds into NC>2 and one-third into
NO.  Brimblecombe (1986) reports a hydrocarbon value of 25 ppbC near forests.
Given this value as a natural lower bound of hydrocarbon, this 25 ppbC was then
resplit according to Table 5 of the "User's Guide for Executing OZIPM-4 with CBM-
IV or Optional Mechanisms" (Hogo and Gery, 1988).  For CO, an  average mid-latitude
value appears to be about 0.18 ppm (Peters and Chameides, 1980). Values used for
background for each Carbon-Bond-IV species are listed in Table  3-9.
 88151r2 10

-------
                    TABLE  3-9.   Background  concentrations  for
                    Carbon-Bond-IV  species.
Species
NO
N02
03
OLE
PAR
TOL
XYL
FORM
ALD2
ETH
CRES
MGLY
OPEN
PNA
NXOY
PAN
CO
MONO
H202
HN03
MEOH
ETOH
Concentration (ppb)
0.17
0.33
40.
0.425
12.5
0.15
0.018
1.75
0.925
0.425
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
180.
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.1
8815lr 1  11

                                  47

-------
                      EMISSIONS INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION

The Urban Airshed Model requires that emissions data be input in a specific and
detailed format. These requirements are more rigorous than those typical of inven-
tories used for planning purposes or trends analysis. For example, total emissions for
entire states or EPA regions may be sufficient for tracking overall trends in emis-
sions. Photochemical modeling, however, requires a spatially disaggregated,
temporally allocated, and chemically speciated emissions inventory. Meeting these
more rigorous requirements entails the collection of additional emissions-related
information such as population distribution data.

In this study we used the 1985 NAPAP Emisions Inventory as the base year from
which all future-year emissions scenarios were developed (Zimmerman et al., 1988).
The future year selected for use in this study is 1995.  The 1985 NAPAP Emissions
Inventory consists of annual county-wide area source emissions including mobile
sources and annual emissions for large point sources, along with stack parameters
(i.e., stack height, diameter, flow rate, and temperature). The methods used to
spatially disaggregate county-wide area source emissions throughout the modeling
domain and the procedure used to temporally adjust annual emission rates to reflect
conditions on a typical summer weekday are discussed in detail later in this section.

The stationary source emissions for the  1995 scenario year were projected from 1985
NAPAP emissions by utilizing growth factors by source category available from an
EPA study by E. H. Pechan and Associates, Inc. (1988). The growth factors used in
this study are discussed in greater detail later. Mobile source emissions were pre-
pared by using scaling factors provided by EPA's Office of Mobile  Sources (OMS)
specifically for each scenario to be analyzed and are presented at length later in this
section.
DEFINITION OF EMISSIONS SCENARIOS

Several emissions inventories were used to verify the UAM and assess the effects of
alternative fuel use and SIP control strategies.  The following list describes each of
the emissions inventories developed for use in this study.
fl81Slr2 iป                               43

-------
     1985 NAPAP—gridding of 1985 NAPAP inventory for CB4 species, as is, to the
     modeling domain.

     1995 base case—this inventory is based on the 1985 NAPAP county inventory.
     Stationary source emissions are projected to 1995 by using emission adjustment
     factors obtained from E. H. Pechan and associates (1988), who estimated emis-
     sion adjustments between 1985 and 1995 based on growth estimates obtained
     from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Mobile source emissions were
     projected from values provided by QMS.

     1995 Emissions Scenarios—these inventories reflect changes in VOC, NOX, and
     CO due to assumptions of future changes in mobile source emission rates such
     as changes in RVP and use of ethanol-blended fuels.  Many possible combina-
     tions of fuel blends and RVP were considered before we selected the following
     emissions scenarios for development and eventual model simulation.

     For New York:*

        Scenario //I—1995 base case with mobile emissions at current RVP values
        (11.5 psi) with running losses.

        Scenario #2—1995 case with mobile emissions at low RVP values (9.0 psi)
        with running losses.

        Scenario #3—1995 case with 100 percent market penetration of a 10 per-
        cent ethanol blend at low RVP values with a 1 psi exemption (10.0 psi) with
        running losses.

         Scenario #4--1995 case at current RVP values without running losses.

     For St. Louis:*

         Scenario //I—1995 base case with mobile emissions at current RVP values
        (10.0 psi) with running losses.

         Scenario #2—1995 case with mobile emissions at low RVP values (7.8 psi)
         with running losses.

         Scenario #5—1995 case with 50 percent market penetration of a 10 per-
         cent ethanol blend at low RVP values with a 1 psi exemption (8.8 psi)  with
         running losses.
* Time constraints and the need to analyze several alternative emission scenarios
 precluded our performing Scenarios 3 and 4 for St. Louis, and the SIP scenarios and
 Scenarios 6 and 7 for New York.
8815Ir2
                                       49

-------
         Scenario #6—1995 case with 100 percent market penetration of an ethyl
         tertiary butyl (ETBE) blended fuel with a 2 percent oxygen content at low
         RVP values (7.8 psi) with running losses.

         Scenario #7—1995 case with mobile emissions at current RVP values (10
         psi) with higher estimates of running losses. These higher  running loss
         emissions were 2.24, 2.02, and 1.58 times higher than the running loss
         emissions in Scenario //I  for, respectively; the light duty gas vehicles, light
         duty gas trucks, and heavy duty gas trucks source categories.

         SIP Scenario A—1995 case with mobile emissions at low RVP values with
         running losses and enhanced I/M (23 percent reduction of on-road motor
         vehicle exhaust VOC emissions), and reduction of non-mobile-source VOC
         emissions to achieve an overall VOC reduction of 40 percent from Scenario
         1. NOX and CO emissions specified were the same as those in Scenario //I.

         SIP Scenario B—1995 case with an overall VOC reduction of 40 percent
         from Scenario 1, where the most reactive species of hydrocarbons are
         reduced first. Reactivity of the individual CB-IV hydrocarbon species was
         ranked by the rate constant used in its reaction with the hydroxyl (OH)  as
         follows (CB-IV species and OH rate constant ppmC/min at 298ฐ K):
OLE
FORM
ALD2
ETH
XYL
ETOH
TOL
PAR
21,000
15,000
12,000
5,960
4,525
2,550
1,307
1,203
For each grid cell, up to 80 percent of an individual hydrocarbon species can be
reduced, and this reduction is accomplished according to the above ordering until a
40 percent VOC reduction in that grid cell is reached.
OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY USED FOR GENERATING EMISSION INPUTS

The 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory contains annual emissions rates from point and
area sources, with area sources compiled on a county-wide basis. To support UAM
applications in this study, many refinements of the 1985 NAPAP inventory were
required. Listed below are some of the most important activities undertaken to
make the 1985 NAPAP emissions inventory compatible for use in the UAM.

     Annual emissions were resolved to hourly values for  a typical summer weekday;

     County-level area source emissions were spatially allocated to grid ceils;


88151r2 4                              50

-------
     Mobile source emissions were recalculated by using EPA procedures based on
     updated MOBILE 3.9 estimates;

     Refueling emissions were removed from the 1985 NAPAP stationary source
     inventory and recalculated according to methodologies supplied by EPA;

     Mobile source running losses were calculated by using EPA procedures based on
     RVP, ambient temperatures, and exhaust emissions, and were added to the
     mobile source inventory;

     VOC emissions were assigned to photochemical reactivity classes; and

     NOX emissions were speciated into NO and NO2ซ

To create the various emissions inventories needed to simulate the desired scenarios,
sets of temporal, spatial, and pollutant species allocation factors were developed and
applied to the annual data contained in the 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory.
Development of the allocation factors and the approach taken to apply them to the
annual data are discussed next.
Temporal Allocation

Temporal allocation of the 1985 NAPAP emissions data was accomplished by apply-
ing seasonal, daily, and hourly fractions to the annual emissions totals to generate
hourly emissions values for a typical summer weekday.

For point sources, the 1985 NAPAP emissions data included process-specific
temporal allocation factors; accordingly, the temporal allocation of point sources
was based on the factors supplied in the inventory.

For most area source categories, temporal allocation factors were derived from
monthly, daily, and hourly cycle information used in a recent application of the UAM
in the South Coast Air Basin region of California (Hogo, Mahoney, and Yocke,
1988).  Table 4-1 lists the area source categories used in the 1985 NAPAP data
base. For those source categories for which no information was available, engineer-
ing judgment was employed to determine temporal allocation factors. For many
source categories, summer weekday emissions are considerably different from values
calculated by using a simple annual average emission rate.  Mobile source emissions
were adjusted to reflect the episodic  temperature conditions by applying adjustment
factors provided by the EPA.  Table 4-2 shows the monthly and weekly variations
assigned to area source categories. On-road motor vehicles were assigned a double-
peaked diurnal profile. Annual emissions were adjusted to episode levels by using
VMT as an activity indicator.  For the reader's convenience, all tables are located at
the end of this section.
 8S151r2 i*
                                        51

-------
Projection of Stationary Point and Area Source Emissions to 1995

As part of the UAM modeling effort, it was necessary to project a 1995 emissions
inventory from the 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory. Projections were made for
both point and area sources for VOC, NOX, and CO emissions.  Figure 4-1 presents a
flowchart of the projection process; the procedures used are described below.

The growth factors used to project the 1985 NAPAP emissions to 1995 were
determined from emission projections developed for the EPA by E. H. Pechan <5c
Associates (1988), who used BEA estimates of economic growth. The emission
projections were grouped by "cost pod," assuming only current EPA emissions control
policy. The "cost pods" represent emission controls of similar cost and were used as
part of an economic analysis carried out for the EPA and unrelated to this study.
For this study, it was necessary to pair the "cost pods" with the NAPAP source cate-
gories for both area and point sources. The resulting pairings are shown in Table
4-3. The growth factors used  in this study were determined by calculating the ratio
of the projected 1995 emissions and the base-year 1985 emissions by "cost pod."  The
resulting growth factors by pollutant for CO and VOC are shown in Table 4-4.  Based
on the projection factors from E. H. Pechan and Associates, NOX emissions from
1995 were assumed to be the same as  for 1985. In the data base provided to Systems
Applications, there were some "cost pods" for which no base-year or projected emis-
sions estimates were provided. For those cases, after consulting with Pechan and
Associates, we made the assumption that the emissions would  remain the same
between 1985 and 1995. In addition, there were numerous point source categories in
the 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory  which had not been assigned to "cost pods" by
E. H. Pechan &. Associates. We assigned these point source categories to "cost pods"
based upon similarity of source categories, using engineering judgment.

The 1995 inventory was generated by computer. We used programs developed by
Systems Applications that read each source description in the  inventory and matched
its Source Classification Code (SCO or NAPAP area source category with a
corresponding "cost pod." The corresponding growth factors for the  "cost pod" were
then retrieved and used to scale the 1985 NAPAP emissions to project the 1995
emissions.
Projection of 1985 Mobile Source Emissions to Base Year 1995

Mobile source emissions were projected to 1995 levels using methodology and data
provided by EPA's Office of Mobile Sources (OMS). First, the total on-road motor
vehicle VOC emissions were divided into exhaust and evaporative emissions accord-
ing to the separation factors contained in Table 4-5, which are based on MOBILE3
simulations and use the same inputs as those used in the development of the 1985
NAPAP inventory. These factors are given by vehicle type (light-duty gasoline
vehicle, light-duty gasoline truck, heavy-duty gasoline vehicle, and heavy-duty diesel
8815 Ir2 it
                                       52

-------
                                                   1985 NEDS/NAPAP  Annual County  Area
                                                Source  Category  and Point Source  Emissions
                    Evap/exhaust
                      separation
                       factors
                     (Table  4-5)
  Annual  average
to episode-specific
  VMT  adjustment
   (Table  4-24)
 1985  to  1995
growth factors
   (Pechan)
                  Annual to episode
                   temperature  and
                MOBILES to MOBILE3.9
                     adjustment
                     (Table  4-7)
    Removal of
 vehicle  refueling
   emissions and
   1985 xo  1995
    adjustment
        C1985  uncontrolled
          refueling  VOC
        losses  for  episode
           (Table 4-8)

      ^"^
   Aldehyde
  adjustment
    factors
  (Table  4-9)
                         1985 to 1995
                          VMT growth
                            factors
                         (Table 4-10)
FIGURE 4-1.   Flowchart  for projection  of 1985 emissions  to  1995.

-------
                        1985 to  1995    ^
                        adjustment  for
                      fleet turnover RVP
                       and I/M  effects
                    (Tables  4-11  to 4-18).
                      Fuel  composition
                     adjustment  factors
                   ((Tables  4-19  to  4-23)
*
                                                        Assignment of
                                                       diurnal  profiles
                                                      by source category
                                                                             Assignment of
                                                                            diurnal  profiles
                                                                          using  NEDS/NAPAP |
                                                                                 data
                    ,   Annual  average
                     to  episode-specific
                       VMT  adjustment
                        (Table 4-24)
^^ 1
^v*
Mobile Mobile Mobile
exhaust evap refueling


Calculation ofN
running losses
and excess ^
evaporative
V^ emissions _y
*/\^
Mobile
exhaust
Mobile
running
I I \
^.
~^
Mobile
refueling
1
                                                          Application  of
                                                         Stage 1, Stage 2,
                                                          and  on-board
                                                             controls
                                                                              Separation of
                                                                           point  sources  with
                                                                           missing UTM  data
                                                                                                                  Unlocated
                                                                                                                    point
                                                                                                                   sources
                                                            Annual  average A
                                                         I to  episode-specific  .
                                                                              *
                                                                                          Point
                                                                                         sources
                                                              adjustment
                                                             (Table  4-25)

1
r
Gasoline
marketing
                                  J
FIGURE  4-1.  Continued.
                                                                  T
                                                                        54

-------
Mobile
exhaust
Mobile
running
Mobile
evap
^^•.^
Mobile
refueling
^•v^
Mobile
exhaust
	 ^_j

Mobile
running
Mobile
evap
^"•ป^
Mobile
refueling
~"^.
                                                        Gridding by
                                                    population  density
                                                       and  industry
                                                      source  category
                                                        Speciation of
                                                        NOx and VOC
                                                       into CB-IV by
                                                        source  type
JGridding  by
•IEDS/NAPAP
 UTM dau
                                                       [Allocation  to
                                                          hours  of
                                                        episode  day
                                                    f~ Separation of ~N
                                                    I   low-level and   I
                                                    I  elevated  sources  J
  Denotes . scenario-specific  adjustments.
FIGURE 4-1.  Concluded.
                                                                 55

-------
vehicle) and road class (urban, rural, and limited access) for counties with and
without I/M programs in the two study regions. A list of I/M applicability by county
appears in Table 4-6.

The resulting exhaust (VOC, CO, and NOX) emissions and evaporative VOC emissions
were adjusted from the MOBILE3-based values used in the 1985 NAPAP inventory to
values consistent with MOBILE 3.9 using the multiplicative factors contained in
Table 4-7.  These factors adjust for the fuel RVP of the emissions scenario (currently
at 11.5 psi for New York and 10.0  psi for St. Louis), and the episodic temperature.

Uncontrolled  refueling losses for 1985 were calculated by multiplying the exhaust
VOC emissions by the factors given in Table 4-8. The multiplicative factors in Table
4-9 were then used to increase exhaust VOC emissions for each vehicle type to
account for the presence of aldehydes that were not counted completely in the FID
reading.

The resulting 1985 exhaust, evaporative, and refueling emissions were projected to
1995 levels using the methodology described below.  First, the emissions by vehicle
type for each county were multiplied by the appropriate factor from Table 4-10 to
reflect the expected growth in VMT between 1985 and 1995. Emissions of the three
pollutants (VOC, CO, and NOX) were then scaled by scenario-specific factors that
account for fleet turnover and  fuel RVP effects between 1985 and 1995.  The factors
for each scenario appear in Tables 4-11 through 4-17.

The multiplicative factors in Tables 4-18 through 4-20, which are also scenario-
specific, were used to account  for the effect of oxygenate  in the fuel (in  the form of
etnanol or ETBE) on emissions of VOC, CO, and NOX. Note that of the scenarios
modeled, only scenarios 3, 5, and 6, which specify use of ethanol blends or ETBE,
require application of these factors.

The 1995 emissions were then converted from an annually averaged daily rate to an
episode-specific daily rate based on the portion of annual VMT occurring  on the epi-
sode day.  The fractions used were derived from 1985 weekday VMT levels for the
state of California.  These data, presented in Table 4-21, include both urban and
rural  VMT and were thus considered indicative of a typical mix of road classes such
as that present  in the New York or St. Louis study regions.

All of the scenarios,  except scenario 4, also required calculation of additional VOC
emissions due to running losses and excess evaporative emissions that are not inclu-
ded in the 1985 NAPAP  inventory. In this calculation the exhaust VOC emissions
were  multiplied by a scenario-specific fraction. The numerator of this fraction con-
sists of the sum of two terms:  the running loss and the excess evaporative emis-
sions, both in grams per mile.  The first term, running losses,  is dependent on tem-
perature, fuel RVP, and the average speed of travel associated with each road
class. The excess evaporative emissions depend on vehicle type and fuel  RVP.

-------
Running losses and excess evaporative emissions for heavy-duty diesel vehicles were
assumed to be zero.  The denominator of the fraction depends on vehicle type, road
class, fuel RVP, and I/M applicability; equations and tables provided by OMS were
used to calculate these fractions on an hourly basis using hourly averaged episode-
day temperature data for the region. The hourly fractions were multiplied by the
portion of the exhaust VOC emissions inventory occurring in each hour of the episode
day, which was determined by applying a double-peaked diurnal profile of on-road
motor vehicle emissions.

Finally, losses from both truck unloading at service stations  and spillage and vapor
displacement occurring during vehicle refueling were adjusted to include the effects
of Stage 1 and Stage 2 gasoline marketing controls.  The 1985 gasoline marketing
VOC emissions for each county were converted from an annual average to an epi-
sode-specific level using the fraction of annual VMT  occurring on the episode day
(Table 4-21). The gasoline marketing emissions were then scaled using factors pro-
vided by OMS to remove refueling losses and adjust for projected decreases in gaso-
line consumption.  Gasoline marketing emissions for all counties in Missouri and New
Jersey and I/M counties in New York were adjusted by a factor that included Stage 1
controls of 48 percent on unloading losses, Stage 2 controls of 74 percent on breath-
ing and emptying losses, and an on-board coverage of 20 percent.  A different factor
was used for counties in Connecticut and Illinois and non-I/M counties in New York
to exclude any benefit from Stage 2 controls.  The resulting gasoline marketing
inventory was then adjusted to scenario-specific levels using the appropriate factors
from Table 4-22.  The hourly vehicle refueling losses were also scaled to reflect 92
percent control of 20 percent of sales due to the 20 percent on-board coverage.
Spatial Allocation of Emissions

Point source records in the 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory contain locational
information that allows straightforward assignment to grid cells. Area sources are
scattered sources of air pollution, such as cars and home heaters, that  emit small
quantities of air pollutants individually but potentially significant quantities in the
aggregate.  Since the  UAM requires a gridded emissions input, the county totals were
spread out (gridded) throughout the county by grid squares.  Area source  emissions
are typically allocated from counties to individual grid cells using spatial allocation
factors, which are fractional multipliers that assign a portion of each county's emis-
sions to a particular grid cell. Generally, since the subcounty distribution of emis-
sions is unknown, emissions are apportioned on the basis of the known distribution of
some surrogate indicator.  Approximately 80 point sources in the St. Louis region had
incomplete or missing locational information. These points were treated as low-level
sources and their emissions were distributed as area source emissions associated with
commercial or industrial activities.  Development and application of the spatial allo-
cation factors used in this study are  described in this section.
 88 151r2

-------
Generally, area source emissions are prepared on a county-wide basis using through-
put or quantity-type data from a variety of informational sources and emissions fac-
tors published by the EPA (EPA AP-42). This procedure results in a relatively high
degree of certainty in county total emissions but does not assign the emissions to any
sub-county regions.

The most straightforward means to apportion county emission totals to sub-county
regions is to distribute them evenly over the entire county. Although this is the
simplest  method, smoothing of the emissions data defeats the benefits of a sophisti-
cated grid model such as the UAM.  In a more accurate allocation scheme, the emis-
sions sources are divided into several classes that can be associated with parameters
for which the distribution is known, such as population, and allocated accordingly.
The more accurate of these approaches was used in this study; emissions were alloca-
ted using several different factors, depending on the source type.

The following steps are necessary to apportion county-wide area source emissions to
grid cells:

     Assign area source categories to classes with surrogate allocation parameters
     having known distributions.

     Determine the fractional area of each county within the modeling domain.

     Determine the fraction of the county-wide total emissions within the modeling
     domain.

     Develop procedures to combine emissions for grid cells overlying more than one
     county.

     Develop an emission grid.

     Perform quality assurance checks to insure the accuracy of the results.

The application of  these steps is described in greater detail below.
Methodology

This subsection describes the efforts undertaken to develop a gridded emission inven-
tory suitable for use as input to the UAM. A computer program "EMGRID" was
developed especially for this project.

STEP 1:  Assign area source categories to classes with surrogate allocation
parameters having known distributions.
88 1 51r 2 i*
                                             58

-------
Throughout this section there are references to area source category and area source
type.  These terms are distinct and non-interchangeable. The source category refers
to the 109 different categories of emission sources that are included in the 1985
NAPAP Emissions Inventory. The source type refers to a grouping of the source
categories, employing engineering judgment to determine similarities between emis-
sions source categories.  The source types used were:

     Type 1: Emissions associated with population distribution
     Type 2: Emissions associated with commercial or industrial activities
     Type 3: Emissions associated with off-highway activities
     Type 4: Emissions associated with agricultural or rural activities

Table 4-23 shows the pairing between area source category and area source type.
(Note that the area source category information was retained during the gridding
process for later chemical speciation.)
STEP 2:  Determine the fractional area of each county within the modeling domain.

As noted earlier, the starting point for the gridding process was the 1985 NAPAP
area source emissions data, which contains county-wide emissions for 109 area
source categories. The computer program EMGRID was developed with the capa-
bility to overlay county boundaries onto any grid system desired.  Using EMGRID, we
determined the fractional area of each  county within the modeling domain.
STEP 3:  Determine the fraction of the county-wide total emissions within the
modeling domain.

Emissions of Types 1, 2, and 4 (discussed earlier) were apportioned according to the
percentage of population within each county in the modeling domain. Emissions of
Type 3 were apportioned according to the amount  of each county's area that lay
within the modeling domain. For example, a county might have 40 percent of its
area but 60 percent of its population within the modeling domain.  In this case, 60
percent of the Types 1, 2, and 4 emissions for that county and 40 percent of the Type
3 emissions would be retained for gridding purposes.


STEP 4:  Develop procedures to combine emissions for grid cells overlying more than
one county.

Since most county boundaries are irregular in shape, it is likely that many grid
squares in a modeling region will overly more than one county. Particular care was
taken in apportioning emissions in these cases.  An apportioning scheme was
developed to account for the difference between the four source types described
 88151r2 i*                                59

-------
above; the scheme was applied when a grid cell overlay more than one county. The
apportioning of these grid cells was performed as follows: (1) for area source cate-
gories of Types 1, 2, or 4 emissions, each county's population-weighted emissions and
emissions related to commerce, industry, or agriculture were summed over the grid
cell; and (2) for area source categories of Type 3 emissions, each county's emissions
were apportioned on the basis of the fraction of the cell that fell within the county
and were summed accordingly.
STEP 5:  Develop an emissions grid using the scheme designed in the steps above.

      Type 1:  Emissions associated with population distribution

Type 1 emissions are those most commonly associated with population density, that
is, emissions that result from everyday activities, such as residential fuel combustion
or motor vehicle usage. These emissions were apportioned on the basis of population
density.  For example, if a grid cell contained 5 percent of the county's population, it
was allocated  5 percent of the Type 1 emissions. For those counties that were only
partially contained within the modeling region, the fraction used was based on the
portion of the county's population in the modeling domain.  If 60 percent of the popu-
lation of Sample County (total population 100,000) was in the modeling domain, the
modeling domain population would be 60,000; if one of the grid cells contained 6,000
Sample County residents, that grid cell would be allocated 10 percent of the model-
ing portion of  the county's total Type .1  emissions (or 6 percent of its actual total
Type 1 emissions).


      Type 2:  Emissions associated with commercial or industrial activities

Allocation of Type 2 emissions is not as straightforward as the allocation of Type 1
emissions.  Type 2 emissions are associated with commercial and industrial activi-
ties, which usually occur near or in heavily urbanized cities or population centers,
but are not directly proportional to population density.  Areas of very high population
density have little space remaining for industrial activities, and areas of moderate to
low population density may include some combination of industrial and commercial
activities.  Additionally, factories that are large enough to be located away from
cities are usually large enough to be treated as point sources, and they are handled
separately.  The approach taken in this study was to  identify a subset of grid cells as
"commercial/industrial11 and to divide each county's Type 2 emissions evenly among
this subset of cells. As a result, if Sample County  had  10 commercial/industrial grid
cells, each cell would be allocated one-tenth of the total Type 2 emissions for the
county.

The method for designating commercial/industrial  grid cells was based upon the frac-
tion  of the county population within the grid cell.  After careful examination of the

-------
urban areas of the region being modeled, it was determined that if an individual grid
cell contained more than 2 percent of a county's population, it would be designated
as a commercial/industrial grid cell.
     Type 3: Emissions associated with off-highway activities

Type 3 emissions include two distinctly different source categories of emissions cal-
led "Off Highway" emissions. For rural counties, these emissions would result pri-
marily from agricultural equipment.  For urban and suburban counties, they would
result from construction and industrial equipment.  These emissions were apportioned
equally over all grid cells in the county. For grid cells containing more than one
county, area-weighted emissions were computed and summed over the grid cell.
     Type 4: Emissions associated with agricultural or rural activities

Several of the area source categories in the 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory are
identified as rural or agricultural, as Table 4-23 shows. Examples of this type of
emission source include vehicles traveling on rural roads and activities related to
agriculture and forestry. Emissions from these source categories were apportioned
according to inverse  population density. That is, more Type 4 emissions were alloca-
ted to grid cells with the lowest populations.


STEP 6: Perform quality assurance checks to insure the accuracy of the results.

The spatial allocation scheme described above is quite complex.  In order to insure
that a proper accounting of all emissions  was performed, the EMGRID program was
developed with the capability to perform internal quality assurance checks. One of
these checks involves printing summary emissions tables prior to and following grid-
ding. The gridding program automatically highlights any discrepancies.
Chemical Speciation

The UAM requires further refinement of VOC and NOX emissions beyond spatial and
temporal distribution.  NOX emissions must be divided into NO and NO2, and VOC
emissions must be categorized according to photochemical reactivity class. Litera-
ture concerning specific NO/NO2 splits for different source types is sparse.  How-
ever, on the basis of similar UAM applications in other urban areas and on EPA gui-
dance, an overall NO/NO2 split of 90 percent/10 percent was used for all source
types in this study. VOC emissions were divided into photochemical reactivity class
by source type for area sources and by Source Classification Code (SCO for point
sources, using the recently released "Air Emissions Species Manual—Vol. 1: VOC
Species Profiles" (EPA 1988).
 88151r2 i*
                                          D.L

-------
Special treatment was required for the speciation of evaporative and exhaust VOC
emissions from mobile and refueling sources for the different modeling scenarios.
There are very little data on the exact composition of these emissions.  One method
of obtaining a higher RVP fuel is to add butane to the fuel mixture.  Some previous
modeling studies have assumed that the excess evaporative emissions from the higher
RVP fuels are ail butane (Whitten, 1988); however, this approach may underestimate
the reactivity of the extra evaporative emissions produced by a higher RVP fuel.
The use of the speciation tables from the EPA speciation manual (EPA,  1988) for
evaporative emissions would incorrectly characterize the composition of the differ-
ent RVP fuels. In this study the speciation of evaporative emissions into their basic
hydrocarbon classes followed the EPA/OMS guidelines as listed in Table 4-24.  The
further speciation of these basic hydrocarbon classes into the CB-IV mechanism
species followed the procedures given in the speciation manual with some allow-
ances, as described below. The speciation of exhaust emissions for the gasoline fuel
scenarios followed the speciation manual, but some interpretation of the data was
necessary and, where appropriate, ethanol or ETBE emissions were accounted for.

The speciation manual (EPA, 1988) lumps propane and propylene into one class (pro-
pane) because the two species cannot be distinguished in the measurement process.
The combined propylene + propane species is assumed to be 100 percent propane for
evaporative emissions and 100 percent propylene for exhaust emissions. Similarly, to
speciate the aromatic species, the manual combines benzene and cyclohexane for
both the evaporative and exhaust emissions. It was assumed that the combined ben-
zene + cyclohexane species emissions were split 50/50 between benzene and cyclo-
hexane for  both evaporative and exhaust emissions.

Additional allowances in the VOC speciation were made  for the ethanol blend-
scenarios.   In addition to the changes in evaporative emissions given in Table 4-24,
the ethanol blends will also slightly modify the composition of the exhaust emissions
given in the speciation manual. For the 10 percent ethanol blend scenarios, it was
assumed that  2 percent by weight of the exhaust VOC emissions were ethanol, with
the remainder of the exhaust emissions speciated according to the manual with the
allowances discussed above. In addition, information provided by EPA/OMS indicated
that exhaust emissions for the ethanol blend had three times the acetaldehyde emis-
sions of gasoline. For the ETBE scenario it was assumed that 2 percent by weight of
the exhaust VOC emissions was ETBE, and the remainder of the exhaust VOC emis-
sions was speciated according to the procedures given in the speciation  manual.
Table 4-25  shows the resultant speciation of the exhaust VOC emissions into the CB-
IV species used by the UAM. On the basis of its molecular structure, the ETBE was
speciated into 4 PARs and 1 ALD2.
88151r2 f                                 62

-------
RESULTS

Figures 4-2 and 4-3 show the spatial distribution of 1995 NOX and VOC emissions
from elevated point sources for the New York study region; Figures 4-4 and 4-5 pre-
sent the same information for St. Louis. Emissions from elevated sources did not
change with scenario, with the exceptions of SIP Scenarios A and B. NOX and VOC
emissions from all low-level sources, including on-road motor vehicles, for New York
scenario  1 are shown in Figures 4-6 and 4-7.  Figures 4-8 and 4-9 show low-level
source NOX and VOC emissions for St. Louis  scenario 1. Table 4-26 contains total
and on-road motor-vehicle-related emissions of VOC, CO, and NOX by scenario for
both the  New York and St. Louis study regions.
 88151r2 4
                                         63

-------
                                                G  a
64
                                                                    CO
                                                                    00

-------
65
                                                             co
                                                             co

-------
                                   NORTH
        706
726
746
                                   SOUTH
766
                                                                   - 4316
                                                                   - 4296
                                                                   - 4276
                                                                   - 4256
                                                            15
                                                                    4236
                             FIGURE 4-4.   Spatial distribution of 1995 NC^ emissions
                             from elevated point sources  for the St. Louis study region
                              (kg/day).
88151
                                           66

-------
                                    NORTH
        706
726
                                   SOUTH
766
                                                                   - 4316
                                                                   - 4296
                                                                   -4276
                                                                   -4256
                                                            15
                                                                    4236
                      XXXXXXXX)
                      mnnf*ปimi
   FIGURE 4-5.  Spatial distribution of 1995 VOC emissions
   from elevated point sources for the St. Louis study
   region (kg/day).
88151
                                         67

-------
emissions from all low-level sources, including on-road motor vehicles, for New York
scenario 1 are shown in Figures 4-6 and 4-7. Figures 4-8 and 4-9 show low-level
source NOV and VOC emissions for St.  Louis scenario 1.  Table 4-29 contains total
         J\:
and on-road motor-vehicle-related emissions of VOC, CO, and NOX by scenario for
both the New York and St. Louis study  regions.
88l5lrl

-------
1S3M.
     69
                                                  QD
                                                  CO

-------
70
                                                             CO
                                                             CO

-------
                                   NORTH
        706
726
746
                                           10
                                   SOUTH
766
                                                                   - 4316
                                                                   -4296
                                                                   - 4276
                                                                   -4256
                                   15
                                                                     4236
                  \\
                            FIGURE 4-8.  Spatial distribution of total 1995
                            emissions from low level sources for Scenario  1 for
                            the St. Louis study region (kg/day).
88151
                                         71

-------
                                   NORTH
        706
726
746
766
                                                                   - 4316
                                                                   - 4296
                                                                   - 4276
                                                                   - 4256
                                           10
                                   15
                                                                    4236
                                   SOUTH
                            FIGURE 4-9.  Spatial distribution of total 1995 VOC
                            emissions from low level sources for Scenario 1 for
                            the St. Louis study region  (kg/day).
88151
                                            72

-------
TABLE 4-1.  NAPAP area source category codes.
        Source
     Category Code                  Category Description
           1          Residential Fuel - Anthracite Coal
           2          Residential Fuel - Bituminous Coal
           3          Residential Fuel - Distillate Oil
           4          Residential Fuel - Residual Oil
           5          Residential Fuel - Natural Gas
           6          Residential Fuel - Wood
           7          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Anthracite Coal
           8          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Bituminous Coal
           9          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Distillate Oil
          10          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Residual Oil
          11          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Natural Gas
          12          Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Wood
          13          Industrial Fuel - Anthracite Coal
          14          Industrial Fuel - Bituminous Coal
          15          Industrial Fuel - Coke
          16          Industrial Fuel - Distillate Oil
          17          Industrial Fuel - Residual Oil
          18          Industrial Fuel - Natural Gas
          19          Industrial Fuel - Wood
          20          Industrial Fuel - Process Gas
          21          On-Site Incineration - Residential
          22          On-Site Incineration - Industrial
          23          On-site Incineration - Commercial/Institutional
          24          Open Burning - Residential
          25          Open Burning - Industrial
          26          Open Burning - Commercial/Institutional
          27          Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access  Roads
          28          Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
          29          Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
          30          Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
          31          Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access Roads
          32          Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
          33          Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
          34          Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
          35          Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access  Roads
          36          Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
          37          Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
          38          Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
          39          Off Highway Gasoline Vehicles
          40          Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Limited Access  Roads
                                                                      continued
                                         73


    8815lr2 2

-------
TABLE 4-1.   (continued)  NAPAP area source category codes.

        Source
     Category Code                Category Description

          41          Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Rural Roads
          42          Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Suburban Roads
          43          Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Urban Roads
          44          Off Highway Diesel Vehicles
          45          Railroad Locomotives
          46          Aircraft LTOs - Military
          47          Aircraft LTOs - Civil
          48          Aircraft LTOs - Commercial
          49          Vessels - Coal
          50          Vessels - Diesel Oil
          51          Vessels - Residual Oil
          52          Vessels - Gasoline
          53'         Solvents Purchased (not used)
          54          Gasoline Marketed
          55          Unpaved Road Travel
          56          Unpaved Airstrip LTOs
          57          (Not used)
          58          (Not used)
          59          (Not used)
          60          Forest Wild Fires
          61          Managed Burning - Prescribed
          62          Agricultural Field Burning
          63          Frost control - Orchard Heaters
          64          Structural Fires
          65          (Not used)
          66          Ammonia Emissions - Light duty Gasoline Vehicles
          67          Ammonia Emissions - Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles
          68          Ammonia Emissions - Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles
          69          Livestock Waste Management - Turkeys
          70*         Livestock Waste Management - Sheep
          71          Livestock Waste Management - Beef Cattle
          72^         Livestock Waste Management - Dairy Cattle
          73          Livestock Waste Management - Swine
          74*         Livestock Waste Management - Broilers
          75^         Livestock Waste Management - Other Chickens
          76'         Anhydrous Ammonia Fertilizer Application
          77          Beef Cattle Feed Lots
          78          Degreasing
          79          Dry Cleaning
          80          Graphic Arts/Printing
                                                                     continued
                                        74
    88 1 51r2  2

-------
TABLE 4-1.   (concluded)  NAPAP area source category codes.

        Source
     Category Code                Category Description

          81          Rubber and Plastics Manufacture
          82          Architectural Coatings
          83          Auto body Repair
          84          Motor Vehicle Manufacture
          85          Paper Coating
          86          Fabricated Metals
          87          Machinery Manufacture
          88          Furniture Manufacture
          89          Flatwood Products
          90          Other Transportation Equipment Manufacture
          91          Electrical Equipment Manufacture
          92          Shipbuilding and Repairing
          93          Miscellaneous Industrial Manufacture.
          94**        (Not used)
          95**        Miscellaneous Solvent Use
          96          (Not used)
          97          (Not used)
          98          (Not used)
          99          (Not used)
          100         Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
          101         Cutback Asphalt Paving Operation
          102         Fugitives from Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture
          103         Bulk Terminal and Bulk Plants
          104         Fugitives from Petroleum Refinery Operations
          105         Process Emissions from Bakeries
          106         Process Emissions from Pharmaceutical Manufacture
          107         Process Emissions from Synthetic Fibers Manufacture
          108         Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production Fields
          109         Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
                        Facilities (TSDFs)

 | SCC 53 is disaggregated into process categories 78 to 95.
 ^ These categories formerly referred to as "manure field application."
 ** Formerly "miscellaneous industrial solvent use" (94) and "miscellaneous
      nonindustrial solvent use"  (95); now combined into one category.
                                        75
    88151r2 2

-------






•
0]
L,
OJ

i
ฃ-,
a

o
•^
4J
ซJ
o

•H
>
rH

ง
•o
ซJ
>,
<-\
o
B
•a
ง

•o
o
o
> t-
Cfl 

4-1
^
O.

to

>>

<-3
ioo<>ionooorioncncnor)CM<\j<\jryajaj
=rzT=rzTOzf=T^-zT^-^-=r^-=r=r=T=TsTzf^-ir\irtiri\ri(Tiir\

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
vOvOvOvO OvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvO^r^^^^r^^r
cocomcoo rorocnpooncocnmrocnmcocooncoo o o o o o

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
vO vO vO ^O O ^ซO ^O ^O vO ^O ^O vO vO vO vD vO vO ^O VO vO O O O O O O
ooro<^cnococoroo^ooroc^rooovOvOvOvOvOvOv0vOsOvฃ>^ra-'^'^-^r^-
cnoocncnornonniroonrnrncnoocoroporopnfoo o o o o o

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
vOvOsOvO OvOvOsOvDvOvOvOvOvOvOvOvO'^vOvO^r^'^'^'^T^r
rncocapnorooncorocococncnrocnrncocnporooooooo

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
\,O vO vO vO O ^ปO \O vO vjO vO ^O vO vO vO vO vO ^O vO VO vO O O O O O O
ro oo ro on o ro co co co on oo on oo on co oo oo on oo on on on on on on on

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
vO vO ^O VO ^5 ^O vO **O \O vO ^O ^O vO ^O vO vO ^O vO vO vO C> ^5 C5 ^D ^^ C5
on on on on o on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
^•O vO vO vO O ^O vO v-O vO vO vO vO vO \O vO vO vO vO vO ^O <^ C^ O^ O** O"N ON
on on on on o on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on on
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooocooocooom
ป-t-,-,-,-ป-,-,-,-,-,-,-.-T-<-ซ-.-ป-,-.-oOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cno^roLniriu^ir\Ln
jT^-^-sr o.3-.=r.a-.^'.=r:3-;T.a-.=r.a-.a-.=r:a-.=r:3-vovo^ovoo

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oo co co co oooooaooooocooooooococococoooco un in un LO un tn
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OO CO CO CO OOOCOCOOOCOOOCO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CTN O> O> CT> CT> O*>
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
t^c^t^t~-c~-r~c— p-c~-c^c\ic~-h-c^t~-c~-c~-c\i e— c\ic~-c~e~^-c— c~-
ซ— c\ioo^rinvฃ>c~-coo>O'-(\jmirm^ot^ooo^O'— ojrozrino

                                                            03
                                                            co
76

-------

X-N
•0
jontinia
n
0)
.u
ฃ.
a
Locatior
i— (
(0
>>
•— i
^
ง
•o
ง
>ป
rH
ฃ
JJ
C
•O
CO
01
TJ
O
O
0)
O
O
W
cn
0)
to
CL
D-
•a
cv]
1
a-
tu
53
•a:
H





ictions
2
Cn
>i
i— i
.c
1




CO
>> J-
flj 0)
Q Q_
<0
CL O
ซs rt i.
a.  3
>
^H
0)
ง
"5
^
L,
O.
1
ฃt
0)
ง
^i
0)
^
0)
TD
O
O
cncocncooooncnpomcoooncopoco^ป— o ^-ojooo'">.=r.=r-=rco
ซ-cooooocx3oo=rcocoQO ooooooooovovoovoinrooocoooooco
ooooooซ-oooooooooooซ-oroooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
c^oomcocnmvo ooonpoocopocooooooo ONO^- t~-m.=T.=r.=T on
VO OO OO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO CTN CT^ C\J O O VO CO CO CO CO CO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO'-'-OOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
c^rn(^onco<^vocnoncnocnonononcMCMe*-oooco=j-=riTco
ocococococooncococoocococococvjcMa-ocnococooococo
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOO'-'-'-O'-OOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oocoroco(^covopn(^MOoooocnoion(^c>-Oi3-ocoinininco
OOCOOOCOCOOOOOCOOOCO OCOCOOOCOC^C^^T OOOCOCOCOCOCO
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOOO'-O'-OOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
co(^(^rnrornvooncocnoooooropoซ— ซ— C"-o^TOmc~-c-c~-on
OO CO CO OO CO CO CO OO CO CO O CO CO CO CO vO VO ST O O O CO CO CO OO 00
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOOO'-O'-OOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooocooooorovooocoooocoooporo'— ซ— t^-ooocoLntninoo
CO OO CO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO O CO CO CO CO ^O vO 3" O CO O CO CO OO CO CO
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOOO'-O'-OOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cocococococovocococoocococococococ^o o o co =r =r =r co
COCOCOCOOOCOCOCOOOCOOCOCOCOCOt^C-iT OCOOCOCOCOCOCO
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOOO'-O'-OOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cocococococovocococoococococooococ~-coc^ocoirir-3-co
OO CO CO OO CO CO COOOCOCO O CO CO CO OO O^C^^1 COCOOCOCOCOCOCO
'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOOO'-rOOOOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
t-cococococot^cococoocococococ\jc\j=rcoo^ocococococo
vOCOCOCOCOCOOCOCOCOOCOCOCOCOCVJCVJC-COCOOCOCOCOCOCO
OOOOOO'-OOO'-OOOO'-'-OCOOOOOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OCOCOCOCOCOCOCOPOCOOCOCOCOCOCOCOLnt~-iriOCOOJicocoO(^ONCO
C\J CO OO OO CO CO t~COOOCO O CO CO CO CO t~C-O OvOvOOO C^ t— C^ CO
OOOOOO'-OOO'-OOOOOOOOO'-OOOOO
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cococooococooocococoomcoroco'-'— o OCTCOCOCTN-c--t-tric^-c^-t~-irtt^-c^c~c~-c--f--c-ir>LnLnc~
cr^a- irivot~-co criO'— rvico=rmvoc~-coo^o ซ— oucoirvoc— cocr>
co zr =r =r ^r =r .=r irimirvtritnmmminLn\ฃjvovx>vovc>vov^>>x>u3
77

-------

^o
>ntinu<
S
w
V

1

a
o

ปH
cd
>>
i-H
ni
0)
TJ

>>
r— 1
-P
C
g
•o
nป
d)
T3
8
0>
y

o
0]
rt
QJ
j^
n)
a.

i-(

|









CO
>> i-
03 0)
a a-
(U
CU 0
< nj ฃ-
Q- a> 3

O
JJ
(ง
a

tt>
, rf
>.

•-s
0
, -j
•-5
rt

t-

t-
y
X3

ง

^
CU
(U
CU
"8
CJ
or)mooooooooซ— oococoooo coomrooroooo oo o
OOOOCOOOCOOOvOOOCOCOOOvOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
mcocococorooooncnfoooocoocornorooooooo
OOOOOOCOOOOO<^OOOOOOOOC^-OOOOO03OOOOOOOOO
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cncomcocooncumoocoooomomcoorooooooo
oooooooocoaorvjoooocooooocooooooooooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
monmmcomcocncocnooomocncoorooooooo
OO CO CO CO CO OO C— CO CO CO O O CT> CO O CO CO O CO O O O O O O

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cncocoonrorn'-cooricoooocoococnofooooooo
COCOCOOOOOCOvOCOCOCOOOOCOOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
rnoncnoncocO'-cocnrooooroorocoocooooooo
COCOCOCOCOCOvOCOCOCOOOOCOOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
mmcocococncorooocoooomocoroocooooooo
CO 00 CO CO CO CO f- COCOCOOOOCOOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
mrofnmmfricoroonpnooocooromorooooooo
cococococococ>cococoooocoococoocooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oi(^pnrncococ\ioocofoooocoocoooocooooooo
OOCOCOCOCOCOCMCOCOCOOOC^COOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oncncncococncooooocoooocoomcoomoooooo
COCOCOCOCOCOC^COOOCOOOCTCOOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oomonmrocooommmoooroooomocooooooo
COCOCOCOCOCOC^COCOCOOOsOCOOCOOOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cooncnoncoro'-mcnmoooooococoocooooooo
COCOCOCOCOCOvOCOCOCO OO vO COOCOCOOCOOOOOOO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
c~f-c-c-r-r~tป-t^invominc~Lnioirvc^-ir>ininir>Lr>mLnin
O'-cvjcoij-ifvvot^cooNO'— c\jonij-Lri>j3f-cOCT\O'-c\jooLn
tป-f— C~-t~t— t— ^-t— t^-f~-COCO CO OO COOOOOCOOOCOC^CT>CT>C^cy>
                                                                 
-------
•o
 a>
TJ

I—I
 o

 o
 o
 CO


 CD
 s,
 c
 o
 01
 o
 o
 2



 C



 >>
 4J
 c
 •O


 rt


 CO
 Q>
 T3
 O
 O
 O
 s-

 s
 CO

 flj
 0)
 iU
 rt

 Cu
 •ai
 cu
 c\j


 iT


 Cd

 CQ














































cu

t ^
•*j
c
o
J^















o
Q
U

o
2
^
o


Q.
ff\
WJ
00
^H*
^5



2
"S
0)
c
2
-3


CO
2u

J^
Q.
ff
^i

t.
(TJ
JL,
J3
0)
r—
t-L4

C
iซ>
^j
CO ^
>> L, QJ
ซJ 
oooooooooo

                                                                      79

-------
TABLE 4-3.   Relationship between cost pods,  source categories,
and source classification codes  (SCC).   (Source:  E. H.  Pechan
4 Associates,  1988).
Source Category Pod #
0. f*/*\Fnhi i o I" i c\n O
"" WUIJJL/UO LsXlrlJ \J
n
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 - Solvent metal cleaning 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 - Printing and publishing 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
SCC
i 	
?-___--
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
40100201
40100202
40100203
40100204
40100205
40100206
40100297
40100299
40100306
40200912
40201199
40200920
41200921
40500101
40500201
40500211
40500212
40500301
 88151 3
                                    80

-------
  TABLE 4-3  (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories,  and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E.  H.  Pechan & Associates, 1988).
Source Category Pod #
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3 - Dry cleaning 3
3
3
3
3
4 - Fixed roof crude tanks 4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
SCC
40500303
40500304
40500305
40500311
40500312
40500401
40500411
40500412
40500501
40500510
405005 1 1
40500512
40500513
40500598
40500599
40500701
40100101
40100102
40100103
40100104
40100199
40300102
40300104
40300105
40300107
40300150
40300152
40300198
40300199
40301010
40301011
40301012
40301013
40301015
40301019
40301021
40301097
40301099
 88151 3
                                    81

-------
 TABLE 4-3   (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories,  and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E.  H.  Pechan & Associates,  1988).
Source Category Pod #
5 - Fixed roof gasoline tanks 5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6 - Floating roof crude tanks 6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7 - Floating roof gasoline tanks 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
SCC
40300101
40300103
40301001
40301002
40301003
40301004
40301007
40301008
40301009
40400101
40400102
40400107
40400108
40400202
40400205
40300203
40300204
40301109
40301110
40301132
40301197
40301198
40301199
40300201
40300202
40301101
40301102
40301103
40301104
40301105
40301107
40301108
40400110
40400111
40400115
40400116
40400117
                                    82
88151 3

-------
 TABLE 4-3   (continued)   Relationship between  cost  pods,
source categories,  and source  classification  codes  (SCO.
(Source:  E.  H.  Pechan 4  Associates,  1988).
Source Category


8 -
9 -
10 -


11 -



12 -


15 -
16 -
17 -




18 -
19 -
















Bulk terminals-splash loading
Bulk terminals vapor balanced
Bulk terminals-submerged loading


Stage I



Stage II


Ethylene oxide manufacture
Phenol Manufacture
Terephthalic acid manufacture




Acrylonitrile manufacture
SOCMI fugitives














Pod i
1
7
8
9
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
15
16
17
17
17
17
17
18
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
sec
40400207
40400210
40600136
40600141
40600126
40600131
103
40600301
40600302
40600306
40600307
40600401
40600402
40600403
30117401
30120201
30100103
30103101
30112099
30113205
30113299
30125405
30100509
30199999
30113799
30103499
30106099
30106008
30116799
30100902
30100999
30100901
30180001
30183001
30188801
102
106
 88151 3
                                      83

-------
TABLE 4-3    (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories, and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E. H. Pechan 4 Associates, 1988).
Source Category Pod #
20 - Petroleum refinery fugitives 20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21 - Cellulose acetate manufacture 21
21
21
21
21
21
21
22 - Styrene-butadiene rubber manufacture 22
22
22
22
22
23 - Polypropylene manufacture 23
SCC
30600801
30600802
30600803
30600804
30600805
30600806
30600807
30600811
30600812
30600813
30600814
30600815
30600816
30600817
30600818
30600819
30600820
30600821
30600822
30688801
30688802
30688803
30688804
30688805
104
30102401
30102410
30102415
30102499
30102501
30102505
107
30102601
30102608
30102609
30102615
30102699
30101802
88151 3
                                      84

-------
TABLE 4-3    (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories, and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E. H. Pechan & Associates, 1988).
Source Category
24 - Polyethylene manufacture




25 - Ethylene manufacture






26 - Pet. ref. wastewater treatment


27 - Pet. ref. vacuum distillation



28 - Vegetable oil manufacture




29 - Paint and varnish manufacture





30 - Rubber tire manufacture


31 - Green tire spray
32 - Carbon black manufacture
33 - Automobile surface coating






Pod *
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
28
28
29
29
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
31
32
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
SCC
30101807
30101812
30101817
30101892
30101899
30119701
30119705
30119799
30125801
30125810
30125815
30125899
30182001
30600503
30600504
30600201
30600301
30600602
30600603
30201901
30201902
30201903
30201911
30201914
30101401
30101499
30101503
30101599
30102001
30102099
30800104
30800105
30800199
30800106
30100504
40200101
40201620
40200110
40200401
40200501
40200510
40200601
 88151 3
                                      85

-------
TABLE 4-3    (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories,  and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E.  H.  Pechan & Associates,  1988).
Source Category Pod #
33
33
33
33
33
33
34 - Beverage can surface coating . 34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
35 - General surface coating 35
35
35
35
35
35
36 - Paper surface coating 36
36
36
36
36
37 - Miscellaneous surface coating 37
37
37
SCC
40200610
40200901
40200998
40201601
40201606
40201631
40200301
40201724
40201705
40200310
40200801
40200802
40200803
40200810
40201702
40201721
40201722
40201723
40201725
40201726
40201727
40201728
40201731
40201736
40201799
40200410
40201901
40202106
40202108
40202109
40202199
40200701
40200706
40200710
40201301
40201399
40200902
40200903
40200904
88151 3
                                      86

-------
 TABLE 4-3   (continued)   Relationship  between  cost  pods,
source categories,  and source  classification  codes  (SCO.
(Source:   E.  H.  Pechan &  Associates,  1988).
Source Category Pod #
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
40 - Paper surface coating 40
41 - Degreasing 41
42 - Dry cleaning 42
43 - Printing/publishing 43
44 - Rubber & plastics 44
45 - Miscellaneous 45
45
45
45
45
45
45
sec
40200905
40200906
40200907
40200909
40200910
40200914
40200915
40200917
40200918
40200919
40200922
40200923
40200924
40200925
40201101
40201103
40201406
40201801
40201806
40201899
40202001
40202201
40202501
40202531
40202599
40288801
40299998
40299999
85
78
79
80
81
83
84
86
87
88
89
90
 88151 3
                                      87

-------
TM5LE 4-3    (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories, and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E. H. Pechan & Associates, 1988).
Source Category





46
47
48
50

51
52


53
54

55





•



60



61



62








- Stage I
- Stage II
- Architectural surface coating
- Coke ovens - door and topside leaks

- Coke oven by-product plants
- Aircraft surface coating


- Whiskey fermentation - aging
- Charcoal manufacturing

- Vessel loading: petroleum liquids









- Light duty gasoline vehicles



- Light duty gasoline trucks



- Heavy duty gasoline vehicles



Pod i
45
45
45
45
45
46
47
48
50
50
51
52
52
52
53
54
54
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
60
60
60
60
61
61
61
61
62
62
62
62
I SCC
91
92
93
94
95
54
54
82
30300302
30300314
30300315
40202401
40202406
40202499
30201003
30100601
30100603
4060023 1
40600232
40600233
40600234
40600235
40600236
40600237
40600238
40600239
40600240
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
88151 3
                                      88

-------
TABLE 4-3    (continued)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories, and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  .E. H. Pechan & Associates, 1988).
Source Category
63 - Heavy duty diesel vehicles



64 - Off highway vehicles


65 - Railroads
66 - Burning and fires






67 - Area source incineration



68 - Aircraft and marine vessels




•


70 - TSDFs
71 - Bakeries
72 - Cutback Asphalt
73 - POTWs
90 - Other








Pod 1
63
63
63
63
64
64
64
65
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
67
67
67
67
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
70
71
72
73
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
SCC
40
41
42
43
39
44
55
45
24
25
26
60
61
62
64
21
50100101
22
23
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
56
109
105
101
100
63
30510199
30501402
30502001
66
67
68
69
70
 88151 3
89

-------
 TABLE 4-3   (concluded)  Relationship between cost pods,
source categories, and source classification codes (SCC).
(Source:  E. H. Pechan & Associates, 1988).

 Source Category	Pod #     SCC

                                             90           71
                                             90           72
                                             90           73
                                             90           74
                                             90           75
                                             90           76
                                             90           77
                                             90          108
88151 3

                                    90

-------
             TABLE  4-4a.  Carbon monoxide  emissions for
             New  York  CMSA assuming  continuation of
             current EPA policy.   (Source:  E.  H. Pechan
             &  Associates,  1988).


Pod
No.
0
12
15
16
60
61
62
63
80
90


1985 NEDS
Emissions
15002
704
2235
1031
1002244
160258
172701
26047
128048
391321
1995
Projected
Base
Emissions
15002
704
2235
1031
583115
122453
52813
18216
139016
424843


1995/1985
Ratio
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
. 0.582
0.764
0.306
0.699
1.086
1.086
8815 lr 1  2
                                    91

-------
              TABLE 4-4a.  (concluded)  Carbon monoxide
              emissions for St. Louis CMSA assuming
              continuation of current EPA policy.
              (Source:  E. H. Pechan & Associates,
              1988).

                                   1995
                                Projected
              Pod   1985 NEDS      Base     1995/1985
              No.   Emissions   Emissions     Ratio

                0       19204       19204     1.000
               11       18992       18992     1.000
               12        3864        3864     1.000
               15        1050        1050     1.000
               17        4069        4069     1.000
               23         246         246     1.000
               60      208366      121229     0.582
               61       65017       49680     0.764
               62       29925        9152     0.306
               63        6261        4378     0.699
               80       30062       32637     1.086
               90       81123       88072     1.086
88 15 lrl  2
                                    92

-------
             TABLE 1Mb.  VOC  emissions  for New York
             CMSA assuming  continuation  of current
             EPA policy.  (Source:   E. H. Pechan &
             Associates,  1988).


Pod
No.
0
1
2
4
5
6
7
19
21
23
24
25
29
33
34
35
36
37 .
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
70
71
72
73
90


1985 NEDS
Emissions
4147
52
2109
193
247
29
1477
252
12
77
142
32
71
1765
2057
1017
12
3417
3173
41217
27451
15892
11920
91382
1556
33314
43703
92824
227311
36193
17305
9492
25774
7443
16836
8231
9996
105446
4198
14403
1906
23460
1995
Projected
Base
Emissions
5659
42
449
150
288
14
2516
299
13
78
144
35
76
262
1855
1864
1
1464
3950
53263
32776
18977
5255
118894
1383
44418
56859
120768
141082
28240
7094
6360
36508
10276
16836
10656
14724
136596
5552
0
2469
23756


1995/1985
Ratio
1.365
0.808
0.213
0.777
1.166
0.483
1.703
1.187
1.083
1.013
1.014
1.094
1.070
0.148
0.902
1.833
0.083
0.428
1.245
1.292
1.194
1.194
0.441
1.301
0.889
1.333
1.301
1.301
0.621
0.780
0.410
0.670
1.416
1.381
1.000
1.295
1.473
1.295
1.323
0.000
1.295
1.013
88151r 1  2
93

-------
              TABLE 4-4b.   (concluded)  VOC emissions
              for St.  Louis CMSA assuming continuation
              of current EPA policy.   (Source:   E.  H.
              Pechan & Associates,  1988).


Pod
No.
0
1
2
4
5
6
7
19
21
23
24
25
29
33
34
35
36
37
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
55
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
70
71
72
73
90


1985 NEDS
Emissions
1131
501
4322
480
1491
2081
2957
184
95
80
909
769
3099
2
8530
2250
83
334
423
5746
3853
2231
1673
12826
226
7256
6134
13029
1742
38862
13121
3086
2274
5348
2603
2596
2890
2882
14392
512
1966
260
10148
1995
Projected
Base
Emissions
1441
310
2329
10
71
246
322
256
95
90
132
679
11
3
1401
1600
22
244
546
7412
4508
2610
722
16546
273
8779
7913
16808
211
23617
9887
1265
1524
6846
3332
2596
3728
3689
18566
737
0
366
5199


1995/1985
Ratio
1.274
0.619
0.539
0.021
0.048
0.118
0.109
1.391
1.000
1.125
0.145
0.883
0.004
1.500
0.164
0.711
0.265
0.731
1.291
1.290
1.170
1.170
0.432
1.290
1.208
1.210
1.290
1.290
0.121
0.608
0.754
0.410
0.670
1.280
1.280
1.000
1.290
1.280
1.290
1.439
0.000
1.408
0.512
88151r 1  2
                                     94

-------
TABLE 4-5.  Exhaust and evaporative emission separation factors for
1985 NAPAP (tons of VOC).
Road Class


Urban
Rural Limited Access
St Louis (Counties with I/M)
LDV

LDT

HDGV

HDDV

St. Louis
LDV

LDT

HDGV

HDDV

New York
LDV

LDT

HDGV

HDDV

New York
LDV

LDT

HDGV

HDDV

Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
(Counties without I/M)
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
(Counties with I/M)
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
(Counties without I/M)
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
Exh.
Evap.
0.682
0.318
0.700
0.300
0.432
0.568
1.000
0.000

0.707
0.293
0.722
0.278
0.432
0.568
1.000
0.000

0.66
0.340
0.677
0.323
0.435
0.565
1.000
0.000

0.712
0.288
0.727
0.273
0.435
0.565
1.000
0.000
0.504
0.496
0.523
0.477
0.223
0.777
1.000
0.000

0.533
0.467
0.548
0.452
0.223
0.777
1.000
0.000

0.479
0.521
0.495
0.505
0.226
0.774
1.000
0.000

0.54
0.460
0.565
0.435
0.794
0.206
1.000
0.000
0.460
0.540
0.477
0.523
0.187
0.813
1.000
0.000

0.489
0.511
0.503
0.497
0.187
0.813
1.000
0.000

0.436
0.564
0.450
0.550
0.189
0.811
1.000
0.000

0.679
0.321
0.554
0.446
0.226
0.774
1.000
0.000
 881517
                                      95

-------
              TABLE 4-6.   I/M applicability by
              county.
                     I/M
   No I/M
              New York region:
                All CT counties
                All NJ counties
                Bronx, NY
                Kings, NY
                Nassau, NY
                New York, NY
                Queens, NY
                Richmond, NY
                Rockland, NY
                Suffolk, NY
                Westchester, NY
Columbia, NY
Dutchess, NY
Orange, NY
Putram, NY
Sullivan, NY
Ulster, NY
              St. Louis region:
                Madison, II
                St. Clair, IL
                Jefferson, MO
                St. Charles, MO
                St. Louis, MO
Calhoun, IL
Greene, IL
Jersey, IL
Macoupin, IL
Monroe, IL
Randolph, IL
Lincoln, MO
88151r 1  2
                                     96

-------
TABLE 4-7.  Multiplicative factors for adjusting 1985 NAPAP annual
emissions to 1985 episode day conditions and for converting from MOBILES
to MOBILES.9 (RVP equal to ASTM limit).
Road Class

St Louis (
LDV



LOT



HDGV



HDDV



St. Louis
LDV



LOT



HDGV



HDDV




10.0 RVP) (Counties with I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
(10.0 RVP) (Counties without
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Urban

0.861
1.230
0.844
0.771
0.873
1.050
0.938
0.800
0.986
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
I/M)
0.865
1.230
0.886
0.767
0.893
1.050
0.958
0.798
0.986
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
Rural Limited Access

0.862
1.230
0.887
0.780
0.874
1.050
0.941
0.727
0.991
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00

0.861
1.230
0.891
0.784
0.891
1.050
0.956
0.807
0.991
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00

0.866
1.230
0.910
0.785
0.876
1.050
0.948
0.805
0.989
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00

0.862
1.230
0.912
0.782
0.888
1.050
0.959
0.806
0.989
0.950
1.150
0.858
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
 88151 7
                                       97

-------
TABLE 4-7.  (Continued).  Multiplicative factors for adjusting 1985
NAPAP annual emissions to 1985 episode day conditions and for converting
from MOBILES to MOBILES.9 (RVP equal to ASTM limit).
Road Class

New York (11.5 RVP)
LDV



LDT



HDGV



HDDV



New York (11.5 RVP)
LDV



LDT



HDGV



HDDV




(Counties with
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Urban
I/M)
0.855
1.480
0.869
0.736
0.886
1.210
0.971
0.767
0.992
1 ..020
1.190
0.835
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
Rural Limited Access

0.848
1.480
0.874
0.748
0.880
1.210
0.969
0.777
0.995
1.020
1.190
0.835
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00

0.852
1.480
0.902
0.748
0.880
1.210
0.973
0.776
1.000
1.020
1.190
0.834
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
(Counties without I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
0.862
1.480
0.900
0.733
0.889
1.210
0.979
0.767
0.995
1.020
1.190
0.835
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
0.858
1.480
0.904
0.749
0.885
1.210
0.976
0.775
0.966
1.020
1.190
0.834
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
0.857
1.480
0.927
0.749
0.886
1.210
0.978
0.774
1.000
1.070
1.190
0.834
1.00
NA
1.00
1.00
88151 7


                                      98

-------
TABLE 4-8.  Factors to multiply by exhaust VOC tons (after adjustment
using Table 2) to obtain 1985 uncontrolled refueling VOC tons for episode
day conditions.
St Louis (10.0 RVP (Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
St. Louis (10.0 RVP) (Counties without
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
New York (11.5) (Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
New York (11.5 RVP) (Counties without
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV

Urban
0.138
0.096
0.106
0.000
I/M)
0.122
0.078
0.106
0.000
0.180
0.113
0.120
0.000
I/M)
0.140
0.089
0.120
0.000
Road
Rural
0.29
0.206
0.280
0.000
0.259
0.168
0.280
0.000
0.382
0.244
0.315
0.000
0.296
0.192
0.315
0.000
Class
Limited Access
0.345
0.245
0.351
0.000
0.308
0.202
0.351
0.000
0.453
0.293
0.393
0.000
0.354
0.195
0.393
0.000
 18151 7
                                      99

-------
                        TABLE 4-9.  Factors to increase
                        1985 exhaust VOC to account for
                        unmeasured aldehydes.
                              All Road Classes
                                    1985

                        LDV            1.0116
                        LOT            1.0116
                        HDGV           1.0116
                        HDDV           1.0420
                       TABLE 4-10.  Growth factors
                       for motor vehicle emissions.

                               All Road Classes
                              Annual    1995:1985

                       LDV    1.9*      1.207
                       LOT    2.1*      1.231
                       HDGV   0.1*      1-.010
                       HDDV   2.9*      1.331
88151 7
                                     100

-------
TABLE 4-11.  1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and
RVP effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenarios 1 and 7.
City:  St. Louis
Gasoline RVP:  10.0
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
 (Counties without I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
                                        Urban
0.487
0.493
0.759
0.477
0.631

0.555
0.470
0.811
0.518
0.651

0.456
0.337
0.852
0.243
0.853

0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
                            Gasohol RVP: NA
                            Gasohol Market Share:  0%

                               Road Class
                             Rural
0.367
0.493
0.759
0.339
0.583
0.387
0.470
0.811
0.330
0.596
0.456
0.337
0.852
0.243
0.853
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.360
0.493
0.759
0.319
0.473
0.364
0.470
0.811
0.301
0.520
0.454
0.337
0.852
0.243
0.855
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
0.482
0.493
0.759
0.450
0.508

0.523
0.470
0.811
0.477
0.563
0.454
0.337
0.852
0.243
0.855
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
                   Limited Access
                        0.333
                        0.493
                        0.759
                        0.255
                        0.456

                        0.337
                        0.470
                        0.811
                        0.249
                        0.520

                        0.454
                        0.337
                        0.852
                        0.243
                        0.854

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.447
0.493
 .759
 .362
                                                                0.
                                                                0.
0.490

0.486
0.470
0.811
0.398
0.563
0.454
0.337
  .852
  .243
  .854
                                                                 0.
                                                                 0,
                                                                 0.
0.628
NA
NA
0.818
0.613

-------
TABLE 4-12.  1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and
RVP effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 2.
City:  St. Louis
Gasoline RVP:  7.8
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
(Counties without I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
WOx
                            Gasohol RVP: NA
                            Gasohol Market Share:

                               Road Class
                                        Urban     Rural    Limited Access
                        0.298
                        0.236
                        0.586
                        0.213
                        0.456

                        0.319
                        0.274
                        0.649
                        0.221
                        0.520

                        0.443
                        0.209
                        0.672
                        0.233
                        0.854

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.445     0.438         0.404
0.236     0.236         0.236
0.586     0.586         0.586
0.399     0.376         0.303
0.631     0.508         0.490

0.523     0.491         0.449
0.274     0.274         0.274
0.649     0.649         0.649
0.461     0.424         0.355
0.651     0.563         0.563

0.441     0.440         0.443
0.209     0.209         0.209
0.672     0.672         0.672
0.233     0.233         0.233
0.853     0.855         0.854

0.630     0.630         0.628
NA        NA            NA
NA        NA            NA
0.819     0.817         0.818
0.613     0.613         0.613
0.338
0.236
0.586
0.283
0.583
0.365
0.274
0.649
0.293
0.596
0.441
0.209
0.672
0.233
0.853
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.330
0.236
0.586
0.265
0.473
0.344
0.274
0.649
0.266
0.520
0.440
0.209
0.672
0.233
0.855
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
                                    102

-------
TABLE 4-13.   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 5.
City:  St. Louis
Gasoline RVP:  7.8
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
 (Counties without I/M)
LDV
 LOT
 HDGV
 HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
                            Gasohol RVP:  8.8
                            Gasohol Market Share: 50%

                  	Road Class	
                   Urban     Rural    Limited Access
                        0.310
                        0.271
                        0.621
                        0.224
                        0.456

                        0.325
                        0.307
                        0.676
                        0.229
                        0.520

                        0.443
                        0.231
                        0.705
                        0.236
                        0.854

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.458     0.455         0.415
0.271     0.271         0.271
0.621     0.621         0.621
0.420     0.396         0.319
0.631     0.508         0.490

0.532     0.500         0.464
0.307     0.307         0.307
0.676     0.676         0.676
0.476     0.439         0.366
0.651     0.563         0.563

0.444     0.445         0.443
0.231     0.231         0.231
0.705     0.705         0.705
0.236     0.236         0.236
0.853     0.855         0.854

0.630     0.630         0.628
NA        NA            NA
NA        NA            NA
0.819     0.817         0.818
0.613     0.613         0.613
0.348
0.271
0.621
0.298
0.583
0.370
0.307
0.676
0.303
0.596
0.444
0.231
0.705
0.236
0.853
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.340
0.271
0.621
0.279
0.473
0.349
0.307
0.676
0.276
0.520
0.445
0.231
0.705
0.236
0.855
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613

-------
TABLE 4-14.  1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 6.
City:  St.
Fuel Type:
RVP:  7.8
Louis
 100? sales of ETBE blend at 2f> oxygen level
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx
(Counties without I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx

          Exh. VOC
          Evap. VOC
          Refuel VOC
          CO
          NOx
                                                    Road Class
                                        Urban     Rural    Limited Access
                        0.298
                        0.236
                        0.586
                        0.213
                        0.456

                        0.319
                        0.274
                        0.649
                        0.221
                        0.520

                        0.443
                        0.209
                        0.672
                        0.233
                        0.854

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.445     0.438         0.404
0.236     0.236         0.236
0.586     0.586         0.586
0.399     0.376         0.303
0.631     0.508         0.490

0.523     0.491         0.449
0.274     0.274         0.274
0.649     0.649         0.649
0.461     0.424         0.355
0.651     0.563         0.563

0.441     0.440         0.443
0.209     0.209         0.209
0.672     0.672         0.672
0.233     0.233         0.233
0.853     0.855         0.854

0.630     0.630         0.628
NA        NA            NA
NA        NA            NA
0.819     0.817         0.818
0.613     0.613         0.613
0.338
0.236
0.586
0.283
0.583
0.365
0.274
0.649
0.293
0.596
0.441
0.209
0.672
0.233
0.853
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.330
0.236
0.586
0.265
0.473
0.344
0.274
0.649
0.266
0.520
0.440
0.209
0.672
0.233
0.855
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
                                     104

-------
TABLE 4-15.   1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenarios 1 and 4.
City:  New York
Gasoline RVP:  11.5
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
 (Counties without I/M)
LDV
LOT
 HDGV
 HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
                                        Urban
                            Gasohol RVP:  NA
                            Gasohol Market Share:  Q%

                               Road Class
                             Rural
0.407
0.491
0.735
0.437
0.568
0.414
0.421
0.791
0.423
0.583
0.456
0.341
0.843
0.239
0.827
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.404
0.491
0.735
0.416
0.459
0.392
0.421
0.791
0.397
0.508
0.455
0.341
0.843
0.239
0.829
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
0.486
0.533
0.735
0.464
0.617
0.559
0.486
0.791
0.514
0.636
0.456
0.341
0.843
0.239
0.827
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.478
0.533
0.735
0.438
0.495
0.527
0.486
0.791
0.475
0.552
0.435
0.341
0.843
0.239
0.829
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
Limited Access
     0.360
     0.491
     0.735
     0.337
     0.444

     0.367
     0.421
     0.791
     0.333
     0.512

     0.455
     0.341
     0.843
     0.239
     0.828

     0.628
     NA
     NA
     0.818
     0.613
     0.438
     0.533
     0.735
     0.352
     0.477

     0.489
     0.486
     0.791
     0.396
     0.552

     0.435
     0.341
     0.843
     0.239
     0.828

     0.628
     NA
     NA
     0.818
     0.613
                                     105

-------
TABLE 4-16.  1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 2.
City:  New York
Gasoline RVP:  9-0
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
(Counties without I/M)
LDV
LDT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
                            Gasohol RVP:  NA
                            Gasohol Market Share:  0%

                      '	Road Class	
                   Urban     Rural    Limited Access
                        0.333
                        0.172
                        0.559
                        0.282
                        0.444

                        0.340
                        0.194
                        0.628
                        0.294
                        0.512

                        0.438
                        0.198
                        0.657
                        0.229
                        0.828

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.444     0.435         0.406
0.201     0.201         0.201
0.559     0.559         0.559
0.388     0.366         0.295
0.617     0.495         0.477

0.526     0.496         0.462
0.249     0.249         0.249
0.628     0.628         0.628
0.459     0.423         0.354
0.636     0.552         0.552

0.441     0.441         0.438
0.198     0.198         0.198
0.657     0.657         0.657
0.229     0.229         0.229
0.827     0.829         0.828

0.630     0.630         0.628
NA        NA            NA
NA        NA            NA
0.819     0.817         0.818
0.613     0.613         0.613
0.370
0.172
0.559
0.364
0.568
0.388
0.194
0.628
0.375
0.583
0.441
0.198
0.657
0.229
0.827
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.371
0.172
0.559
0.348
0.459
0.369
0.194
0.628
0.351
0.508
0.441
0.198
0.657
0.229
0.829
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613
                                     106

-------
TABLE 4-17.  1995:1985 emission factor ratios for fleet turnover and RVP
effects for episode day conditions and inventory scenario 3.
City:  New York
Gasoline RVP:  9.0
(Counties with I/M)
LDV
LOT
HDGV
HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
 (Counties without  I/M)
 LDV
 LOT
 HDGV
 HDDV
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx

Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
Refuel VOC
CO
NOx
                  Gasohol RVP:  10.0
                  Gasohol Market Share:  100$

                  	Road Class	
                   Urban     Rural    Limited Access
                        0.347
                        0.254
                        0.647
                        0.303
                        0.444

                        0.354
                        0.255
                        0.698
                        0.310
                        0.511

                        0.444
                        0.239
                        0.743
                        0.233
                        0.828

                        0.628
                        NA
                        NA
                        0.818
                        0.613
0.453     0.443         0.406
0.243     0.243         0.243
0.618     0.618         0.618
0.406     0.383         0.309
0.617     0.495         0.477

0.532     0.504         0.468
0.285     0.285         0.285
0.651     0.651         0.651
0.472     0.435         0.364
0.636     0.552         0.552

0.444     0.446         0.444
0.219     0.219         0.219
0.714     0.714         0.714
0.449     0.229         0.232
0.701     0.829         0.828

0.630     0.630         0.628
NA        NA            NA
NA-        NA            NA
0.819     0.817         0.818
0.613     0.613         0.613
0.386
0.254
0.647
0.394
0.568
0.398
0.255
0.698
0.394
0.583
0.448
0.239
0.743
0.233
0.827
0.630
NA
NA
0.819
0.613
0.382
0.254
0.647
0.375
0.459
0.381
0.255
0.698
0.369
0.509
0.446
0.239
0.743
0.233
0.829
0.630
NA
NA
0.817
0.613

-------
TABLE 4-18.  Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
(oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for St. Louis scenario 5.
City:  St. Louis
Scenarios:  50% gasohol sales (scenario 5)
                                                    Road Class


Urban
Rural Limited Access
(Counties with I/M)
LDV



LOT



HDGV



HDDV



(Counties without
LDV



LOT



HDGV



HDDV



Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
0.969
1.033
0.883
1.038
0.948
1.052
0.860
1.029
0.946
1.076
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.965
1.033
0.881
1.038
0.948
1.052
0.859
1.030
0.946
1.073
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
0.967
1.033
0.889
1.037
0.949
1.052
0.861
1.029
0.946
1.076
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.966
1.033
0.882
1.038
0.949
1.052
0.861
1.029
0.946
1.073
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
0.967
1.033
0.882
1.037
0.949
1.052
0.862
1.029
0.946
1.076
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.965
1.033
0.881
1.038
0.949
. 1.052
0.861
1.029
0.946
1.073
0.858
1.020
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
                                     108
88151 7

-------
TABLE 4-19.  Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
(oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for St. Louis scenario 6.
City:  St. Louis
Scenarios:  100^ ETBE blend sales (scenario 6)

                                                    Road Class


Urban
Rural Limited Access
(Counties with I/M)
LDV



LOT



HDGV



HDDV



(Counties without
LDV



LDT



HDGV



HDDV



Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
0.963
1.035
0.873
1.041
0.944
1.044
0.848
1.032
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.962
1.035
0.871
1.041
0.943
1.044
0.847
1.033
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
0.963
1.035
0.873
1.041
0.945
1.044
0.850
1.032
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.963
1.035
0.872
1.041
0.945
1.044
0.849
1.032
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
0.963
1.035
0.872
1.041
0.945
1.044
0.850
1.031
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.962
1.035
0.871
1.041
0.945
1.044
0.849
1.032
0.941
1.053
0.846
1.022
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
 88151 7
                                    109

-------
TABLE 4-20.  Adjustment factors to account for fuel composition effects
(oxygen and distillation, but not RVP) for New York scenario 3.
City:  New York
Scenarios:  100^ gasohol sales (scenario 3)

                                                    Road Class

(Counties
LDV



LDT



HDGV



HDDV



(Counties
LDV



LDT



HDGV



HDDV




with I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
without I/M)
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Exh. VOC
Evap. VOC
CO
NOx
Urban

0.932
1.050
0.766
1.075
0.898
1.092
0.720
1.059
0.891
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.930
1.050
0.762
1.075
0.895
1.092
0.716
1.060
0.891
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
Rural Limited Access

0.933
1.050
0.768
1.074
0.900
1.092
0.724
1.058
0.891
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.931
1.050
0.763
1.075
0.897
1.092
0.720
1.059
0.891
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.933
1.050
0.766
1.074
0.900
1.092
0.725
1.057
0.892
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000

0.931
1.050
0.762
1.074
0.897
1.092
0.721
1.058
0.892
1.144
0.716
1.039
1.000
NA
1.000
1.000
                                    110

88151 7

-------
              TABLE 4-21.   California state highway
              system estimated VMT for 1985 weekday
              travel.   (Source:  California Department
              of Transportation,  1987).
VMT
Month (billion miles)
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
TOTAL
5.83
5.97
6.13
6.50
6.52
6.77
6.94
7.28
6.71
6.42
6.40
6.36
77.83
Fraction of
Annual Total
0.075
0.077
0.079
0.084
0.084
0.087
0.089
0.094
0.086
0.082
0.082
0.082

88151r2  2
                                       111

-------
TABLE 4-22.   Gasoline marketing emission adjustment factors for
RVP and fuel type (EPA,  QMS,  1988).
RVP     Gasoline    100ฃ Gasohol   IQOfl ETBE Blend   50% Gasohol

11.5   1.15          not needed     not needed        not needed
10.0   1.0          0.958          not needed        not needed
 9.0   0.9          not needed     0.953             not needed
 8.8   not needed   not needed     not needed        not needed
 8.4   not needed   not needed     not needed        0.812
 7.8   0.78          not needed     0.826             not needed
88151r2 2

-------
TABLE 4-23.  Relationship between NAPAP area source category codes and area
source types used for gridding purposes.
Source
Category Code
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
. 24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Source
Type*
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
4
1
1
2
4
1
1
2
4
1
1
3
2
Category Description
Residential Fuel - Anthracite Coal
Residential Fuel - Bituminous Coal
Residential Fuel - Distillate Oil
Residential Fuel - Residual Oil
Residential Fuel - Natural Gas
Residential Fuel - Wood
Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Anthracite Coal
Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Bituminous Coal
Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Distillate Oil
Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Residual Oil
Commercial/Institutional Fuel - Natural Gas
Commercial /Institutional Fuel - Wood
Industrial Fuel - Anthracite Coal
Industrial Fuel - Bituminous Coal
Industrial Fuel - Coke
Industrial Fuel - Distillate Oil
Industrial Fuel - Residual Oil
Industrial Fuel - Natural Gas
Industrial Fuel - Wood
Industrial Fuel - Process Gas
On-Site Incineration - Residential
On-Site Incineration - Industrial
On-site Incineration - Commercial/Institutional
Open Burning - Residential
Open Burning - Industrial
Open Burning - Commercial/Institutional
Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access Roads
Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access Roads
Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
Medium Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Limited Access Roads
Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Rural Roads
Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Suburban Roads
Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles - Urban Roads
Off Highway Gasoline Vehicles
Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Limited Access Roads
continued
                                             113

    88 1 SIp2 2

-------
TABLE 4-23.   (continued)  Relationship between NAPAP area source category codes
and area source types used for gridding purposes.
Source
Category Code
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53*
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
- 64
65
66
67
68
69*
70*
71ง
72ง
73!
74ง
75*
76t
77
78
79
80
Source
Type*
4
1
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
4
0
0
0
4
4
4
4
1
0
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
Category Description
Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Rural Roads
Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Suburban Roads
Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles - Urban Roads
Off Highway Diesel Vehicles
Railroad Locomotives
Aircraft LTOs - Military
Aircraft LTOs - Civil
Aircraft LTOs - Commercial
Vessels - Coal
Vessels - Diesel Oil
Vessels - Residual Oil
Vessels - Gasoline
Solvents Purchased (not used)
Gasoline Marketed
Unpaved Road Travel
Unpaved Airstrip LTOs
(Not used)
(Not used)
(Not used)
Forest Wild Fires
Managed Burning - Prescribed
Agricultural Field Burning
Frost control - Orchard Heaters
Structural Fires
(Not used)
Ammonia Emissions - Light duty Gasoline Vehicles
Ammonia Emissions - Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicles
Ammonia Emissions - Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicles
Livestock Waste Management - Turkeys
Livestock Waste Management - Sheep
Livestock Waste Management - Beef Cattle
Livestock Waste Management - Dairy Cattle
Livestock Waste Management - Swine
Livestock Waste Management - Broilers
Livestock Waste Management - Other Chickens
Anhydrous Ammonia Fertilizer Application
Beef Cattle Feed Lots
Degreasing
Dry Cleaning
Graphic Arts/Printing
                                                                     continued
                                        114
    88151r2  2

-------
TABLE 4-23.   (concluded)  Relationship between NAPAP area source category codes
and area source types used for gridding purposes.
   Source
Category Code
Source
 Type*
Category Description
      81          2       Rubber and Plastics Manufacture
      82          1       Architectural Coatings
      83          2       Auto body Repair
      84          2       Motor Vehicle Manufacture
      85          2       Paper Coating
      86          2       Fabricated Metals
      87          2       Machinery Manufacture
      88          2       Furniture Manufacture
      89          2       Flatwood Products
      90          2       Other Transportation Equipment Manufacture
      91          2       Electrical Equipment Manufacture
      92          2       Shipbuilding and Repairing
      93          2       Miscellaneous Industrial Manufacture
      94**        0       (Not used)
      95**        1       Miscellaneous Solvent Use
      96          0       (Not used)
      97          0       (Not used)
      98          0       (Not used)
      99          0       (Not used)
     100          2       Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
     101          2       Cutback Asphalt Paving Operation
     102          2       Fugitives from Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture
     103          2       Bulk Terminal and Bulk Plants
    . 104          2       Fugitives from Petroleum Refinery Operations
     105          2       Process Emissions from Bakeries
     106          2       Process Emissions from Pharmaceutical Manufacture
     107          2       Process Emissions from Synthetic Fibers Manufacture
     108          4       Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production Fields
     109          2       Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
	Facilities (TSDFs)	

Notes:

* Source type:

     1 - Population
     2 - Commercial industrial
     3 - Off-highway
     4 - Rural
     0 - Not used

 t SCC 53 is disaggregated  into process categories 78  to 95.
 * These categories formerly referred  to as  "manure field application."
** Formerly "miscellaneous  industrial  solvent use" (94) and "miscellaneous
      nonindustrial solvent use"  (95); now combined into one  category.
                                        115

-------
  TABLE 4-24.  Speciation of evaporative VOC emissions by weight percent
  of VOC (Source:  EPA/OMS, 1988).
Gasoline RVP

Paraffins (total)
n-butane
Isobutane
n-pentane
Isopentane
Other paraffins1
Olefins1'2
Aroma tics '^
Ethanol
ETBE
11.5
70
27
6
4
13
20
13
17
0
0
10.0
67
24
6
4
13
20
15
18
0
0
9.0
64
21
6
4
13
20
17
19
0
0
7.8
60
17
6
4
13
20
20
20
0
0
Ethanol
Blend RVP
10.0
57
14
6
4
13
20
13
15
15
0
8.8
55
12
6
4
13
20
14
16
15
0
ETBE
Blend RVP
9.0
58
15
6
4
13
20
15
17
0
10
7.8
54
11
6
4
13
20
18
18
0
10
  1 Within other paraffins, olefins, and aromatics, speciated with the
    same relative weights as given in the speciation manual (EPA, 1988).

    Speciation manual combines propylene (propene) and propane and
    lists it as propane; assumed it was 100 percent propane.

  3 Speciation manual combines benzene and cyclohexane, speciated as
    half each compound.
88151  7
                                     116

-------
TABLE 4-25.  Speciation of exhaust VOC emissions by weight percent of VOC
into CB-IV species.
CB-IV
Species
OLE
PAR
TOL
XYL
FORM
ALD2
ETH
MEOH
ETOH
Gasoline RVP
11.5
3
53
11
20
1
2
10
0
0
10.0
3
53
11
20
1
2
10
0
0
9.0
3
53
11
20
1
2
10
0
0
7.8
3
53
11
20
1
2
10
0
0
Ethanol Blend ETBE Blend RVP
RVP/Market Share (100* Market Share)
10.0/100?
4
51
11
19
1
3
10
0
2
8.8/50?
4
52
11
19
1
3
10
0
1
7.8
4
53
11
19
1
3
10
0
0
    88151r2 2
                                            117

-------




^
JQ

X
0
2

C
CO
o"
O

tS
o
^*
0

Of}
Q
0
•H
CO
CO
•H
B
ง

CO
^i
co
•3
ฃ^
|
o
^H
a
Jc
>
SH
O
4J
g

•0
O
L,
C
O

c:
Cfl

r^
03
•4^
o
E-i


•
vO
CM •
1 O
•3" -H
01 





















3
o
e-


i
CO
,_(
o *
•O -H -0
S*™1 rtl
^ w
a) -a
ฐT ^ S
t t rt
SL, 0>
0 0=

o
X


OJ
4j
Q
E~*



i
(U
rH
a *
^Q *f4 ^3
งf^ flj
0} JJ
as > cd
1 1 rH
C ฃ- (3J
<5 o os
4J
o



3
o
H


1
0)
rH
O *
•o -H -a
Sf" fl>
A- w
(U JP
ce > - in
CO CO CM CO







O O =T O
fl- vO vO W
CO CO ON CO
co in CM co
T- .— t— T-




in vo co vo
ON CO in ON
CM it ON in

sr co co CM





iT O> vO CM
C— CM ST ON

CM ซ- CO t—
CM ซ- ซ-








ซ- CM CO .=T

O O O O
•H i-l -H -H CO
X ฃ- ฃ- t- S- -H
I- i •/*
Wi
1 CO
L. i-l
O E
•4-> CO
i co
c
TJ -H
cd J->
O CO
cL ^
i i-
c cd
o g

to co
CO CZ
T3 -H
3 -H
O CO
c cd
hH bO

*
                                                           CM
                                                           t.
                                                           CD
                                                           ID
118

-------
         5   ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN AIRSHED MODELING RESULTS
In this section we present the results of exercising the UAM(CB-IV) for the New York
and St. Louis episodes using various emission scenarios. These emission scenarios
consist of a base year inventory, several inventories for 1995 reflecting the effects
of changes in mobile VOC and CO emissions due to different fuel RVP and ethanol
blends, and SIP control strategies for St. Louis. In the following discussion, we pre-
sent ozone concentrations in parts per hundred million (pphm) and differences  in
ozone concentrations in parts per billion (ppb). Note that for the ozone NAAQS .12
ppm = 12.0 pphm =  120 ppb.  To have confidence in model results, it is desirable to
first evaluate the model by using a meteorological base year emissions inventory and
concurrent ozone observations to compare model results with measurements.
MODEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

A major effort in past (JAM applications was devoted to the many diagnostic simula-
tions required to achieve strict model performance standards. One of the key com-
ponents of the UAM PLANR application is a relaxation of these strict model per-
formance evaluation requirements. Thus the goal of the UAM PLANR application is
to achieve a satisfactory level of performance involving as few diagnostic simula-
tions as possible. However, the model must show some skill in predicting observa-
tions to promote confidence in its ability to correctly respond to changes in inputs,
such as alternative emission scenarios.

Model performance evaluation can be divided into two categories: statistical and
diagnostic. In the statistical evaluation, model predictions are compared with obser-
vations to see how  well model results agree with observations.  In a diagnostic
evaluation, the goal is to determine why the model predicts what it does.  Diagnostic
evaluation generally involves many simulations in which the input data vary to pro-
vide insight into the reasons for the model's predictions. Although diagnostic evalua-
tions are important, time and resource constraints allowed only a statistical evalua-
tion of the UAM  to be carried out as part of this project.

For the PLANR use of the UAM(CB-IV) for New  York and St. Louis described herein,
only one evaluation simulation was carried  out. Model inputs were prepared accord-
ing  to the objective techniques described in Section 3, and the model was exercised
using the best estimate of a meteorological base year inventory.  For St. Louis, the
88151r2 3
                                         119

-------
emission inventory used in the model evaluation was derived from the emission
inventory used in the St. Louis ozone modeling project (Schere and Shreffler, 1982;
Cole et al., 1983) and was for the year 1976. For the New York metropolitan area,
the emission inventory used in the model evaluation was derived from the 1988
SCOPE Base Case inventory used in the OMNYMAP project (Rao, 1987) and was for
the year 1988. Both inventories had to be converted from CB-II to CB-IV species.
The uncertainties introduced by not using proper CB-IV speciation methodologies and
the 1988 year inventory for the New York evaluations are unknown.  Model predic-
tions were compared with observations, and, given the uncertainties noted, the model
exhibited sufficient skill in predicting observations that no diagnostic simulations
were deemed necessary to improve model performance.

The fairly good level of model performance noted in these two UAM applications
using the PLANR procedures may be due in part  to the fact that both episodes were
modeled and evaluated in a previous simulation involving the CB-II version of the
UAM and that both applications made use of nonroutine data. Thus it is possible that
future  UAM PLANR applications may require some diagnostic simulations to improve
model  performance.

In the following discussions of model performance evaluation, we focus on three
aspects of the model's ability to replicate observations:

     1.    Accuracy in predicting the peak observation.  The peak observation will
           be compared with the peak prediction that occurs anywhere within the
           modeling domain (unmatched by time and location).  Traditionally, it has
           been a UAM performance goal that the peak predicted value be within 30
           percent and in the general location of the peak observed value unmatched
           by time or location. Traditionally, model performance has been con-
           sidered to be good if the maximum ozone concentration is matched to
           within 15 percent.  In addition, the peak prediction at the location of the
           peak observation will be compared with the maximum observation
           (matched by location but not time).

     2.    Accuracy in predicting hourly ozone concentrations.  Hourly predicted
           and observed ozone concentrations will be paired together, matched by
           time and location, to reveal whether the model  replicates the diurnal and
           spatial variability noted in the observations.  Model results will be
           examined to determine whether the model exhibits any systematic bias in
           predicting observations.

     3.    Accuracy in predicting maximum daily observations throughout the
           modeling domain. Model results will be examined to determine whether
           the model predicts the observed spatial patterns of the maximum daily
           ozone observations. Exceptional model performance will be indicated if
           the model predicts all of the observed maximum daily ozone observations
           within 30 percent matched by location but not by time.
 88151r2 a

                                          120

-------
The focus has been on accuracy because, if desired, it can be accounted for in the
development and adoption of control strategies.

Although there are many statistical measures that can be used to evaluate model
performance (Fox, 1981, 1984; Dennis, Downton, and  Keil, 1983), only a few key sta-
tistical measures are discussed for the two paired data sets of predictions and obser-
vations:  hourly ozone concentrations matched by time and location and maximum
daily ozone concentrations matched by location only. Other statistical measures of
model performance are presented in figures and tables. Since statistical perform-
ance measures alone do not always provide a clear picture of model performance, we
also present several qualitative measures of model performance. These measures
include time series of predicted and observed hourly ozone concentrations at each
monitoring site and spatial maps containing isopleths of predicted  maximum daily
ozone concentrations, with the maximum daily observation superimposed at the loca-
tion of the observation.

The key statistical performance measures to be presented for the  two  paired data
sets are as follows:

     Average Observed
     Average Predicted
     Bias = Averge Observed - Average Predicted
     Absolute Average Gross Error
     Correlation Coefficient

Comparison of the average observed and predicted hourly ozone concentrations pro-
vides an  indication of how well the model is reproducing the observations on
average. A zero bias  indicates that the model is underpredicting to the same degree
that it is overpredicting. The absolute average gross error measures  how well the
hourly model predictions match the observations in an absolute sense.  If the bias is
approximately equal in magnitude to the absolute average gross error, then the
model is systematically over- or underpredicting.  The correlation coefficient, when
applied to the hourly ozone concentration pairs, provides insight into how well  the
model can reproduce the diurnal and spatial variability of the observations. Perfect
model performance, which is nearly impossible to attain because of the stochastic
nature of the atmosphere and the differences in what the predictions and observa-
tions represent, would be a bias and absolute average gross error of zero and a corre-
lation coefficient of one.

The correlation coefficient between the predicted and observed maximum daily
ozone concentration pairs indicates how well the model replicates the spatial pattern
of the maximum daily ozone observations. Before we present a comparison of  the
predicted and observed hourly ozone concentrations,  it should be noted that there are
fundamental differences in what the observed and predicted ozone values represent.

88151r2  8
                                           121

-------
Model predictions are for a grid cell average and represent a volumetric average for
a volume ranging from approximately 2 to 100 cubic kilometers.  The observations,
on the other hand, are representative of a point and may be subject to sub-grid-scale
influences. Of particular importance for ozone measurements is the possibility that
NOX sources located near the ozone monitor may cause a local titration of the
observed ozone concentration that is not reflected in the grid cell ensemble concen-
tration.
Evaluation of the New York Application of the UAM(CB-IV)

The New York modeling episode spanned the period beginning at 1200 LST on 7
August 1980 and ending at 2000 LST on 8 August 1980. The sole purpose of initiali-
zing the model at noon on 7 August was to eliminate the effects of initial conditions
on ozone and ozone precursor concentrations on 8 August. Thus we limit our evalua-
tion discussion for the New York episode to model predictions for 8 August  1980.

Within the New York modeling domain there were 32 ozone monitoring sites.  The
site names and four-character identifiers are listed in Table 5-1, while the locations
of the monitors are shown in Figure 5-1. Of the 32 sites, two (LIND and MIDS) did
not collect any ozone observations on 8 August, and another (MORR) lay inside a
boundary cell that  is not modeled by the UAM. Thus 29 observation sites remained
for model evaluation. (For the reader's convenience, all figures and tables are loca-
ted at the end of this section.)

Figure 5-2 displays isopleths of the predicted maximum daily ozone concentrations
on 8 August 1980.  Also shown  in Figure 5-2 are the maximum daily observed ozone
concentrations at all sites superimposed over the predicted isopleths.  The peak
observed ozone of 24.6 pphm occurred at Stratford, CT (STRF), while the peak pre-
diction of 23.5 pphm occurred approximately 30 km to the east-southeast of STRF in
the Long Island Sound between Long Island, NY and the coast of Connecticut.  The
model predicts the peak observed  ozone concentration within k percent, unmatched
by time or location.  Since there are no ozone monitors in the vicinity of the predic-
ted peak ozone concentration, it is uncertain whether the ozone peak actually occur-
red over the Long Island Sound.

Examination of the predicted and  observed maximum daily ozone concentrations
away from the peak observation at STRF reveals that the model tends to overpredict
the maximum daily ozone concentrations throughout the  region (Figure 5-2).  This
tendency toward overprediction of the afternoon ozone concentrations is also illus-
trated in the time  series  plots of predicted and observed  hourly ozone concentrations
at all sites presented in Figure 5-3. The maximum daily  ozone  concentration predic-
ted by the model typically occurs 1  to 3 hours later in the afternoon than does the
observed maximum.  The model predicts a maximum daily ozone concentration of
 88151r2 8

                                            122

-------
21.4 pphm (underprediction by 13 percent) at STRF 3 hours later (4:00 p.m.) than the
occurrence of the observed peak. However, there is some doubt whether the STRF
observations are representative of the large-scale ozone buildup observed in southern
Connecticut.  In fact, at an ozone monitor in Bridgeport, CT (BRPT), less than 8 km
from STRF, the observed maximum daily ozone is 17 pphm, whereas the predicted
maximum daily ozone concentration is 20 pphm, an 18 percent overprediction at this
site. Clearly, the model cannot resolve such sharp spatial concentration gradients in
the observations using an 8-km grid spacing.

A more representative measure of the observed ozone buildup over southern Con-
necticut would be to combine the four ozone monitors, STRF, BRPT, Derby (DRBY),
and New  Haven (NHVN), that lie within  a few grid cells of each other. When the
hourly  observations from these four sites are averaged and compared with the corre-
sponding  average predictions, we see that the model is better at predicting the
ensemble spatially averaged observed ozone than a point measurement (Figure 5-4).
The model overpredicts the observed maximum daily ozone averaged for the four
sites in southern Connecticut by about 27 percent, matched by time and location.
The maximum observed and maximum predicted ozone concentrations both occur at
the same time of the day (2:00 p.m.).

The maximum predicted ozone concentrations at all other sites are within a factor of
two except at three sites (HEMP, MAMA, and  POUG). This discrepancy may be due
to ozone  titration from local sources at these sites. The HEMP site is the only site
with concurrent NOX measurements, and observed NOX concentrations are high (10
pphm). Thus overprediction of ozone at the HEMP site can be attributed to local
NOX emissions. Unfortunately, there are no concurrent  NOX measurements at the
other two sites, where significant overprediction occurs.

Figures 5-5 and 5-6 display scatterplots, residual analysis, and some statistical mea-
sures for all hourly ozone concentrations (matched by time and location) and for the
maximum daily ozone concentrations (matched by location but not time). Over all
hours (Figure 5-5a) the predictions and observations correlate well, with a correla-
tion coefficient of 0.80. However, as illustrated in the time series analysis and
maximum daily ozone isopleths in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, the model tends to overpre-
dict observations, on average, by approximately 3.1 pphm (51 percent).  The absolute
average gross error is 3.8 pphm (62 percent), approximately the same as the bias,
which indicates that the model is systematically overpredicting the observations.

The model, on average, tends to overpredict by 5.4 pphm (45 percent) the maximum
daily ozone concentrations at each site  (Figure 5-6).  The absolute average gross
error is 5.6 pphm (47 percent), again indicating a systematic overprediction.  The
model  does show some skill in replicating the spatial distribution of the observed
maximum daily ozone concentrations, with a correlation coefficient of 0.58 between
predicted and observed maximum daily ozone concentrations matched in location but
not in time.
88151r2  8

                                            123

-------
Comparison of UAM(CB-IV) Model Performance for
New York with Performance in a Previous Study

The 8 August 1980 episode was modeled with the CB-II version of the UAM by the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) as part of the
Oxidant Modeling in the New York Metropolitan Area Program (OMNYMAP). As dis-
cussed in Section 3, the OMNYMAP UAM(CB-II) inputs formed a starting point for
the inputs prepared for the UAM(CB-IV) for this study. The principal differences
between this study and the OMNYMAP UAM evaluation of 8 August  1980 are:  (1)
this study used the latest version of the UAM, which includes the chemistry of the
CB-IV and an improved advection algorithm; (2) in this study the modeling period was
extended by beginning the simulation at noon on 7 August compared to starting at
4:00 a.m. on 8 August in the OMNYMAP study; (3) this study used a diagnostic wind
model, whereas the OMNYMAP study used constant wind fields; however, the bulk
flow direction remains similar; (4) in  this study the region top was held constant at
1500 m, whereas a rising region top was used in the OMNYMAP study; (5) this study
used slightly lower boundary conditions on the southwestern inflow boundary; and (6)
this study used a 1988 emissions inventory whereas the OMNYMAP study used  a 1980
inventory.

Table 5-2 compares some key statistical performance measures for application of the
UAM(CB-IV) in this study and the OMNYMAP application of the UAM(CB-II) for 8
August 1980.  As seen in Table 5-2, the OMNYMAP application of the UAM(CB-II)
also tended to overpredict observations.

The OMNYMAP application of the UAM tended to produce a double ozone peak:  one
centered over the Connecticut coastline and one located over the New Jersey coast-
line. The ozone peak over  New Jersey predicted by the UAM  in the OMNYMAP
study is not supported by the observations (see sites EORG, BAYO, and PLFD in
Figure 5-3).  It is suspected that this predicted ozone peak may have been caused by
prescription of higher boundary condition concentrations near the southwest corner
of the modeling domain.  In this study the UAM did not predict an ozone  peak over
New Jersey. In general,  however, the UAM model performance  in this study was
comparable to the performance in the OMNYMAP study. Any differences may be
attributable to this study's use of a 1988 emissions inventory, which  contains
approximately 32 and 14 percent less VOC and NOX emissions, respectively.

The UAM(CB-IV) application has shown some skill in predicting observed ozone con-
centrations for 8 August 1980  in the  New York metropolitan area. There is a general
tendency to overpredict the maximum afternoon observed ozone concentration.
However, the peak observed ozone concentration is replicated within 4 percent
unmatched by time and location, and within 13 percent when matched by location but
not time. Overall model performance could most likely be improved by using a 1980
emissions inventory and/or finer model resolution and/or by lowering the boundary
conditions or other uncertain inputs that would in turn lower the predicted afternoon
 88lSlr2  8                                 ]_24

-------
peak ozone concentrations throughout the modeling region.  However, this procedure
may also result in less agreement with the observed peak ozone value.  The single
evaluation simulation of the UAM(CB-IV) indicates that the model displays sufficient
skill in replicating observations and will provide a useful and credible tool for analy-
sis of the formation of elevated ozone episodes in the New York metropolitan area.
Evaluation of the St. Louis Application of the UAM(CB-IV)

The St. Louis modeling episode spanned the period from midnight to 1900 LST on
13 July 1976. This modeling episode was an extension of a previous UAM(CB-II)
modeling episode performed as part of the St. Louis modeling project (Cole et al.,
1983; Schere and Shreffler, 1982), in which the model was exercised from 0400 to
1800 LST. The purpose of extending the episode the extra four hours in this study
was to minimize the effects of initial conditions on the afternoon peak predicted
ozone concentrations.

The St. Louis modeling period coincided with the Regional Air Pollution Study
(RAPS); thus there was a fairly dense network of 21 ozone monitors within and
around the city of St. Louis. On 13 July 1976, seven of the monitors did not measure
afternoon ozone concentrations; 14 monitoring sites provided sufficient data for con-
ducting a model performance evaluation. Figure 5-7 shows the spatial distribution of
the ozone monitoring network; sites 102, 104, 105,  111, 115,  118, and 121 are the
seven sites with no afternoon ozone observations.

Figure 5-8 shows isopleths of the predicted maximum daily ozone concentrations
with the maximum daily observations superimposed. The peak observation is 22.2
pphm and occurs at hour  16, while  the peak prediction anywhere in the modeling
domain is 24.2 pphm (within 9 percent of the peak observation) and also occurs at
hour 16, approximately 10 km to the southwest (upwind) of the observation.

The time series of predicted and observed  ozone concentrations for  all the sites
within the St. Louis modeling domain are shown in Figure 5-9.  The model exhibits
very good agreement at almost all sites. At the location of the observed peak ozone
concentration (site  114),  the model appears to replicate the rise of the observations
in the morning  until around 1000 LST, when a shoulder appears in the time series of
predicted concentrations. This shoulder is most probably due to a wind shift in the
input wind field.  Despite the shoulder, the model reproduces the observed peak at
site 114 within 1  percent (22.2 pphm observed versus 21.9 pphm predicted), although
the modeled peak occurs two hours later than the observed peak.  The peak observed
ozone concentration at each site is replicated by the model within 30 percent at all
sites except site  108. At site 108 the model predicts a sharp spike for peak ozone
that is not supported by observations.

Figure 5-10 contains a scatterplot, residual analysis, and some  statistical measures
comparing the hourly predicted and observed  ozone concentrations for all hours of 13
 381Slr2  8

                                           125

-------
July 1976. Except for a tendency to overpredict the extremely low nighttime ozone
observations, the model exhibits no systematic bias in predicting the hourly observed
ozone concentrations. The bias between the predicted and observed ozone concen-
trations is -0.9 pphm, yielding an average overprediction of approximately 14 per-
cent. The gross absolute error is 1.7 pphm (28 percent), which indicates that the
model is not systematically over- or underpredicting.  The predicted hourly ozone
concentrations correlate extremely well with the observations, with a correlation
coefficient of 0.92.

A scatterplot and statistical measures for the predicted and observed maximum daily
ozone concentrations, matched by location but not time, are given in Figure 5-11.
Again the model exhibits substantial skill in replicating the observed maximum daily
ozone concentrations with a bias of only 1.0 pphm (6 percent) and an absolute
average gross error of only 2.* pphm (16 percent). The spatial distribution of the
observed maximum daily ozone concentrations is also  reproduced by the model, with
a correlation coefficient of 0.68.
Comparison of UAM(CB-IV) Model Performance for
St. Louis with Performance in a Previous Study

The 13 July 1976 episode was one of the 20 early ozone episodes from RAPS used to
evaluate an early version of the UAM and other urban-scale photochemical air
quality simulation models in the early 1980s (Schere and Shreffler, 1982). Table 5-3
displays several key statistical performance measures for the 13 July 1976 St. Louis
modeling episode discussed in this study using the UAM(CB-IV) and from the previous
study using the UAM(CB-II). In general, the bias and correlation coefficients for
both the UAM(CB-IV) and UAM(CB-II) applications to St. Louis on 13 July indicate
quite good model performance (bias in magnitude is less than 1 pphm, and correlation
coefficients are greater than 0.9).  However, the UAM(CB-IV) predictions of peak
observed ozone concentrations in this study are substantially better than those pro-
duced by the UAM(CB-II) in the previous study. Comparison of  the peak predicted
ozone concentrations anywhere within the modeling domain with the peak observed
ozone concentrations (unmatched by time or location) reveals that the UAM(CB-IV)
overpredicted by 9 percent, whereas the UAM(CB-II) underpredicted by 22 percent.
The UAM(CB-IV) predicted the observed peak ozone at the monitoring site (matched
by location but not time) to within 2 percent, whereas the UAM(CB-II) underpredic-
ted the maximum observed ozone concentration at the site by 25 percent.

The UAM(CB-IV) model performance for the St. Louis region is quite good by any
measure. The improvement in model performance over the past application of the
UAM(CB-II) may  be due to improvements in the treatment of chemistry and advec-
tion in the model, and improvements in the wind fields. However, this improvement
in model performance tends to indicate that the UAM(CB-IV), using the PLANR input
preparation procedures, does produce significantly better modeling results than those
obtained with the earlier version of the UAM and its preprocessor programs.
                                         126

-------
ANALYSIS OF UAM RESULTS FOR NEW YORK

The UAM(CB-IV) was exercised for four separate future year emission sensitivity
scenarios reflecting VOC emissions changes resulting from use of different fuel RVP,
use of ethanol-blended fuels, and running loss mobile emissions. These four emission
scenarios for New York can be summarized as follows:

     Scenario 1:  1995 emission rates at current RVP values (11.5 psi) with running
     losses,

     Scenario 2:  1995 emission rates at low RVP values (9.0 psi) with running losses,

     Scenario 3:  1995 emission rates with a 100 percent market penetration of a 10
     percent ethanol-blended fuel at the low RVP values with a 1 psi exemption
     (10.0 psi) with running losses, and

     Scenario 4:  1995 emission rates at current RVP values (11.5 psi) with no
     running losses.

All four of the 1995 emission scenarios were exercised using the same initial and
boundary conditions (i.e., the changes in the 1995 emission scenarios were not reflec-
ted in the boundary conditions). Thus the changes in the 1995 emissions have to be
viewed as local changes  in the  emissions inventory within the New York modeling
domain. The changes in emissions are not reflected in regions upwind of the New
York metropolitan area. It is even more important that the reader bear in mind that
the results do not reflect changes from regional and/or national policies (e.g.,
reducing RVP on a regional basis).  This study treated the lower RVP as occurring
only in the study area.

The  four 1995 emission scenarios described above are designed to address the follow-
ing issues:

     Fuel RVP.  The EPA  is considering regulations to require lower fuel RVP to
     reduce evaporative VOC  emissions from mobile and gas refueling sources.
     Note that limitations in our modeling capabilities precluded our examining at
     this time the impact of regional (i.e., Northeast Corridor) lowering of RVP.
     Results of scenarios  1 and 2 do not reflect the likely "real-world" policy, nor
     does comparison of them provide definitive  results.

     Ethanol-blended fuels.  The use of ethanol blends in gasoline-powered vehicles
     results in significant reductions in exhaust CO emissions but some increases in
     exhaust NOX and evaporative VOC emissions. At this time it is unclear
     whether the increase in ozone concentrations due to the increases in VOC
     emissions will be counteracted by the reductions in ozone due to the reductions
88151r2  3
                                      127

-------
     in CO emissions.  Comparison of scenarios 2 and 3 allows us to assess the
     potential benefits or disbenefits of ethanol-blended fuels regarding ozone con-
     centrations.

     Running losses. The term "running losses" refers to VOC emissions that occur
     during the operation of the vehicle that have not been accounted for in past
     mobile source emission inventories. These VOC emissions have only recently
     been estimated and have not been rigorously treated  in any previous ozone
     modeling analysis. Comparison of scenarios 1 and 4 allows us to estimate the
     effects of running loss emissions on urban ozone concentrations.

Previous UAM studies of the New York modeling domain have reported a high degree
of sensitivity of peak ozone predictions to initial and boundary conditions (Rao, 1987;
Rao and Sistla, 1987).  Rao and Sistla examined the sensitivity of the UAM to emis-
sions, initial concentrations, and boundary conditions by exercising the UAM with and
without the influences  of these components.  Although their sensitivity analysis was
performed for a different  episode than the one studied here, the general meteoro-
logical conditions, boundary conditions, and model predictions were similar.  The
overall conclusion reached by Rao and Sistla was that initial and boundary conditions
contributed approximately 70 to 90 percent of the maximum ozone concentrations in
the New York metropolitan area for the episode studied.

In light of the importance of initial and boundary conditions in the work reported by
Rao and Sistla, it was decided to perform a weighted tracer simulation for the New
York modeling episode. The weighted tracer simulation gives an indication of the
relative influences of initial conditions, boundary conditions, and emissions  on VOC
and NOX concentrations in the regions of elevated ozone predictions. Since the
weighted tracer simulation will provide insight into the UAM results for the 1995
emission scenarios, it is discussed next.
Tracer Simulation for New York

In a weighted tracer simulation, the UAM is run in an inert mode (i.e., no chemistry
or deposition) with seven different "colored tracers" (species) representing the
effects of initial conditions, lateral boundary conditions (four colors, one for each
face), boundary top conditions, and emissions. Each colored tracer represents the
different contributors to VOC concentrations within the modeling domain.  The
magnitudes of the initial and boundary conditions and emission rates correspond to
the actual  VOC initial and boundary conditions and emissions for the 1995 modeling
scenario 1. Similarly, seven other colored tracers are set up for the NOX species,
resulting in a UAM 1 ^-species weighted tracer simulation.

Note that the weighted tracer simulation cannot be used for a secondary species such
as ozone. Also, colored tracers cannot exactly apportion the source (initial condi-
tion, boundary condition, or emissions) of a pollutant concentration at a given grid
 881Slr2 8                                2.28

-------
ceil and time since the inert tracer simulation neglects deposition and chemical
transformation. However, the simulation can, in a general sense, provide an esti-
mate of the relative importance of the contribution of initial concentrations, boun-
dary conditions, and emissions to pollutant concentrations.

Figure 5-12a displays the percent contribution of the hydrocarbon boundary condi-
tions and emissions to the total hydrocarbon concentrations for hours 1200 LSI
through 1700 LSI on 8 August 1980. Upwind of New York City, boundary conditions
are the predominant contributor to modeled hydrocarbon concentrations. From New
York City to the location of the peak predicted ozone concentration, which the cal-
culations locate in the middle of Long Island Sound late in the afternoon, boundary
conditions and emissions contribute about equally to the modeled atmospheric con-
centrations of hydrocarbons.  Downwind of the location of the peak modeled ozone
concentration, boundary conditions contribute approximately 40 percent, and emis-
sions about 60 percent to the  total modeled hydrocarbon concentrations.  Away from
the predicted elevated ozone  cloud that stretches from New York City over the Long
Island Sound, boundary conditions tend to contribute more than emissions to the pre-
dicted hydrocarbon concentrations.  Initial conditions do not contribute at all to the
atmospheric concentrations on 8 August.

The percent contribution of boundary conditions and emissions to calculated ambient
NOX concentrations on the  afternoon of 8 August is presented in Figure 5-12b. Boun-
dary NOX concentrations contribute approximately 40 percent to ambient NOX con-
centrations in the regions of highest predicted ozone concentrations, with NOX emis-
sions contributing the remainder.  As has been noted for the hydrocarbons, away
from the predicted peak ozone cloud, NOX concentrations are more influenced by
boundary conditions than by emissions within the modeling domain.
New York 1995 Emission Scenarios

Interpretation of the effects of the different 1995 emission scenarios on ozone con-
centrations must include the influences of boundary conditions. Since boundary con-
ditions are estimated to contribute about half of the hydrocarbon concentrations in
the region of elevated ozone concentrations, and boundary conditions remained
unchanged for all 1995 emission scenarios, then the effectiveness of  VOC emission
reductions on ambient ozone concentrations would be much less than if the boundary
conditions also reflected the changes in the alternative emission inventories.

Table 5-4 summarizes the hydrocarbon, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide emis-
sion rates for the 1995 emission inventories.  Also tabulated are VOC-to-NOx ratio,
estimated from the inventory, for each scenario.  Of particular note  is that the VOC-
to-NOx ratio for the 1995 scenario 1 base case emissions inventory is 10.8 compared
to current urban emission inventory VOC-to-NOx ratios that usually  range from 3 to
6. Since NOX reacts away into secondary products faster  than VOC species do, urban
ambient measurements of VOC-to-NOx ratios are  higher (the national average is
 83151r2  8
                                        129

-------
around 10, and a three-year average (1983-1985) for New York City is around 12).
Reductions of VOC emissions are less effective in reducing ozone at high VOC-to-
NOX ratios than at lower VOC-to-NOx ratios.  The 1988 Scope Base Case and 1985
NAPAP emission inventories have lower VOC-to-NOx ratios, 3.4 and 4.8, respec-
tively, than those exhibited by the 1995 scenario 1  base case.  The projection of the
emissions from the 1985 NAPAP inventory to the 1995 inventory without running
losses (scenario 4) results in a VOC-to-NOx ratio of 7.2. This increase in the VOC-
to-NOx ratio is primarily  due to the increases in evaporative VOC emissions resulting
from the change from Mobile-3 to Mobile-3.9 emissions.  Mobile-3.9 accounts for
increases in evaporative emissions due to increases in temperature and RVP. The
addition of running loss VOC emissions to the inventory, which adds an additional 50
percent VOC to the scenario 4 inventory, results in a 50 percent increase in the
VOC-to-NOx ratio, from 7.2 to 10.8 in the 1995 base case inventory at current RVP
(scenario 1).

Exercising  the UAM(CB-IV) for the four 1995 emission scenarios generates gridded
fields of hourly concentrations for 22 species at 5 vertical levels for the 32-hour
simulation. The following discussion is accompanied by isopleth maps of the maxi-
mum daily  ozone concentrations and hourly ozone concentrations in  the afternoon of
8 August.  In addition, difference plots of  maximum daily and hourly ozone concen-
trations between scenarios are presented, where appropriate.
Effects of Lower RVP

As seen in Table 5-4, the effect of lowering the RVP of gasoline fuel in New York
from the current value of 11.5 to 9.0 results in a 24 percent reduction in VOC emis-
sions.  Although these VOC reductions are mainly lower reactive hydrocarbons
(butane and pentane), there are also some reductions in more reactive species such as
olefins and xylenes.

Figures 5-13 and 5-14 show isopleth maps of maximum daily ozone concentrations for
the current RVP (scenario 1) and low RVP (scenario 2), respectively. Isopleths of
afternoon hourly ozone concentrations for scenarios 1 and 2 are presented in Appen-
dixes D-l and D-2.  Qualitatively, the effect of lower RVP on ambient ozone concen-
trations is very small.  The calculated highest ozone concentration of 17.4 pphm is
similar for both scenarios. The highest ozone concentration for scenario 2 is calcula-
ted to  be located somewhat further  downwind of the city (Figures 5-13 and 5-14).
Further evidence of the similarity of results is observed in the difference plots
between scenario 1  and scenario 2 for the maximum daily ozone and afternoon hourly
ozone concentrations shown in Figure 5-15 and Appendix D-3.  Immediately down-
wind of New York City, the area with the largest fraction of mobile emissions, there
is a  region of decreased maximum ozone concentrations due to lower RVP stretching
across Long Island.  The maximum decrease is approximately 1.4 ppb. However,
further downwind at the end of Long Island, there is a region of slight increases in
                                         130
 88151r2 8

-------
the maximum daily ozone concentrations due to the lower RVP.  Although the
increases and decreases in the ozone concentrations are low, maximum values of
approximately 1.5 ppb, the observation that a reduction in VOC emissions results in
an increase in the maximum daily ozone concentration in some regions is somewhat
surprising.  This topic is discussed further later in this section.

Although the highest ozone concentrations are the same for the current and low RVP
scenarios, the low RVP scenario produces lower ozone concentrations earlier in the
day (see Appendixes D-l, D-2, and D-3).  Thus the lower RVP may help reduce  the
number of people-hours exposed to ozone concentrations in excess of the NAAQS.  It
is important to remember that, given the large VOC reductions, the apparent lack of
change in ambient ozone is confounded by the analysis's failure to account for the
effects of changes in fuel RVP on the long-range transport of pollutants (i.e.,
boundary conditions).
Effects of Ethanol-Blended Fuels

Figures 5-16 and 5-17 display, respectively, isopleths of the maximum daily ozone
concentrations predicted for the 1995 ethanol-blend scenario (scenario 3) and the dif-
ference in maximum daily ozone concentrations between scenario 3 and scenario 2.
(similar figures for the afternoon hourly ozone concentrations are given in Appen-
dixes D-4 and D-5).  There is a very slight increase in the maximum daily ozone con-
centrations, with a maximum increase of less than 1 ppb.  Downwind of New York
City, CO concentrations decrease about 2 to 4 percent, while there are slight
increases in hydrocarbon and NOX concentrations. Examination of the differences in
hourly ozone concentrations between the ethanol-blend scenario (scenario 3) and the
low RVP scenario (scenario 2) (Appendix D-5) reveals that the effects of ethanol
blends on hourly ozone concentrations are very small, with ozone increases or
decreases always less than 1 ppb.
Effects of Running Losses

The maximum daily ozone isopleth concentrations for the current RVP scenario
without running losses (scenario 4) and differences with the scenario with running
losses at current RVP (scenario 1) are shown in Figures 5-18 and 5-19, respectively
(the corresponding figures for afternoon hourly ozone concentrations are given in
Appendixes D-6 and D-7).  Despite a 33 percent reduction in VOC emissions, there is
only a slight (up to 2 ppb) reduction in the maximum daily ozone concentrations. As
was noted for the low RVP scenario, further downwind from the region of elevated
ozone, there is a slight increase in ozone for the scenario with running losses.  How-
ever, it appears that including running loss VOC emissions will result in significant
increases in hourly ozone concentrations earlier in the day (see Appendix D-7).
Between the hours of 1200 to 1300, running loss VOC emissions increase ozone con-
centrations in some regions by as much as 20 ppb (2.0 pphm).
 8615 Ir2  8

                                       131

-------
Preliminary Analysis of the New York 1995 Emission Scenarios

Table 5-5 summarizes the VOC emission reductions and the predicted changes in the
highest ozone concentrations for the four 1995 emission scenario simulations for New
York. The  most striking feature of these simulations is the insensitivity of the
highest ozone concentration to the VOC emission reductions.  However, this insensi-
tivity is not surprising when one considers the effects of the boundary conditions, the
high VOC-to-NOx ratio in the 1995 emission inventories, and the fact that a higher
percentage of less reactive hydrocarbon species (paraffins) is part of the  VOC emis-
sion reductions  than is in the normal distribution of the inventory.

The southwestern boundary conditions (the most prominent inflow boundary) have
(molar) VOC-to-NOx ratios that vary from approximately 30 to 70.  Given this VOC-
to-NOx ratio; the estimate from the tracer simulation that approximately half of the
hydrocarbons and NOX concentrations at the location of the maximum ozone concen-
trations come from the boundary conditions; and the fact that NO  reacts away
faster than VOC, the effective atmospheric VOC-to-NOx ratio would be greater than
about 20.  Thus the largest VOC emissions reduction, a 33 percent VOC reduction
from scenario 1 to scenario 4, would only lower the effective atmospheric VOC-to-
NOX ratio by about 2 units (from a value greater than 20 to a value greater than
18). Usually the atmospheric VOC-to-NOx ratio must be below approximately 15
before the  beneficial effects of hydrocarbon reductions on ozone concentrations can
be realized.

Calculated VOC-to-NOx ratios tend to be higher than those estimated  above because
the effects of chemical transformation and deposition of NOX are included. The 6:00
to 9:00 a.m. LST VOC-to-NOx ratios range from 8 to 15 at sites in New York City to
approximately 20 on the Connecticut-New York coastline border (WPLN and GWCH)
and up to 16 to 40 for the sites around the location of the peak ozone (STRF) on the
Connecticut coastline.

Although the effects of the boundary conditions and high VOC-to-NOx ratios in the
1995 emission inventories can explain the small reductions in ozone concentrations
due to VOC emission reductions; they do not, by themselves, explain the  slight ozone
increases further downwind of New York City at the end of Long Island and in north-
eastern Connecticut that are associated with the  lowering of VOC emissions in
scenarios 2 and 4. Comparisons of predicted concentrations in the afternoon for
scenarios  1 and *f reveal that scenario 4 contains about 10 percent higher NOX con-
centrations in this region. This higher NOX concentration is almost exactly compen-
sated by lower  peroxyacyl nitrate (PAN) and nitric acid concentrations, which may
explain the slight increases in ozone concentrations far downwind of New York City
in scenarios 2 and 4. The reductions in VOC emissions in New York City, noted in
scenarios 2 and 4, result in a decrease in the generation of radical concentrations
immediately downwind of  New York City.  These  decreases in radical concentrations
 88151r2 8

-------
result in a decrease in the rate of ozone formation (as indicated by the lower ozone
concentrations earlier in the day) and in the rate of transformation of NOX to PAN
and nitric acid. Further downwind, there is still an abundance of hydrocarbon con-
centrations; however, NOX levels are low near the eastern end of Long Island (less
than 1 ppb). Since less of the NOX has been transformed to PAN in the VOC emission
reduction scenarios, there is more NOX available for ozone formation.  At these high
VOC-to-NOx ratios, small increases in NOX concentrations result in increases in
ozone.

Another possible explanation for the predicted increases in ozone in VOC emission
reduction scenarios 2 and 4  compared to scenario 1 is the ozone reaction with olef ins
and toluene VOC species. At lower VOC concentrations there is less depletion of
ozone due to its reaction with olefins and toluene, resulting in slightly higher ozone
concentrations. Although these explanations appear plausible, time constraints did
not allow thorough investigation into the causes of these phenomena; thus further
study is needed.
ANALYSIS OF UAM RESULTS FOR ST. LOUIS

The UAM(CB-IV) was exercised for the St. Louis episode for seven 1995 emission
scenarios—five reflecting the changes in mobile sources due to differences in fuels,
and two VOC reduction scenarios corresponding to State Implementation Plan (SIP)
control strategies. These 1995 emission scenarios are summarized as follows:*

     Scenario 1:  1995 emission rates at current RVP values (10.0 psi) with running
     losses,

     Scenario 2:  1995 emission rates at low RVP values (7.8 psi) with running losses,

     Scenario 5:  1995 emission rates with a 50 percent market penetration of a 10
     percent ethanol-blended fuel at low RVP values with a 1 psi exemption (8.8 psi)
     with running losses,

     Scenario 6:  1995 emission rates with a 100 percent market penetration of
     oxygenated fuel with enough ethyl butyl tertiary ether (ETBE) to produce a fuel
     with a 2 percent oxygen content with running losses (note that a 10 percent
     ethanol blend results in a fuel with a 3.7 percent oxygen content),
* Time constraints and the need to analyze several alternative emission scenarios
  precluded our performing Scenarios 3 and 4 for St. Louis, and the SIP scenarios and
  Scenarios 6 and 7 for New York.
88151r2  8

                                       133

-------
     Scenario 7: 1995 emission rates at current RVP values (10.0 psi) with a high
     estimate of running losses,

     SIP scenario A: 1995 emission rates at low RVP (7.8 psi) with enhanced I/M and
     other non-mobile-source VOC emissions reduced uniformly to result in a 40
     percent VOC reduction from scenario 1, with the same CO and NOX emissions
     as in scenario 1, and

     SIP scenario B: 1995 emission rates with a 40 percent VOC reduction from
     scenario 1, where the most reactive species of hydrocarbons are first reduced
     up to 80 percent in each grid cell to obtain the 40 percent total VOC reduction.

These 1995 emission scenarios are designed to address the following issues:

     Fuel RVP. As in the New York scenarios, comparison of scenarios 1 and 2 will
     allow us to estimate the effects of lower fuel RVP on urban ozone concentra-
     tions,

     Alternative fuels.  Two types of alternative fuel scenarios will be simulated for
     St. Louis:  a 50 percent market penetration of a 10 percent ethanol-blend and a
     100 percent market penetration of an ETBE blend.  Unlike ethanol blends,
     ETBE does not increase evaporative VOC emissions and thus may produce more
     benefits regarding ozone reductions than will an ethanol blend.

     Running losses. There is considerable uncertainty in running loss emission
     rates.  The 1995 UAM simulations for New York and St. Louis have used a best
     guess of running losses obtained from an EPA OMS analysis of running loss
     emissions from 12 cars. Running loss emissions may be higher or lower than
     the best guess estimate.  A higher estimate of running losses is used in scenario
     7.  Comparison of scenarios 7 and 1  allows us to estimate the effects of the
     uncertainty in running loss emissions on ozone concentrations.

     SIP control strategies. The two SIP scenarios represent two different ways of
     obtaining a 40 percent VOC emissions reduction from scenario  1.  The main dif-
     ference in the two SIP scenarios is that in SIP scenario B, the most reactive
     hydrocarbon species are targeted for reduction first. Comparison of the ozone
     reductions obtained in SIP scenarios A and B with those in scenario 1 allows us
     to estimate the importance of including hydrocarbon reactivity in SIP control
     strategies.
Effects of Lower RVP

Figures 5-20 and 5-21, respectively, display isopleths of the maximum daily ozone
concentrations for the current RVP (scenario 1) and low RVP (scenario 2) scenarios.
Isopleth plots of afternoon hourly ozone concentrations for scenarios 1 and 2 are
 aaisir2 s
                                          134

-------
given in Appendixes E-l and E-2. The difference plots of maximum daily ozone and
afternoon ozone concentrations between scenario 1 and scenario 2 are illustrated in
Figure 5-22 and Appendix E-3. Despite the lower net VOC emissions reduction due
to lower RVP than was noted in the corresponding New York case (15 percent reduc-
tion versus 24 percent reduction), ozone concentrations are reduced to a greater
extent in St. Louis (up to 5 ppb at the location of the peak).  As Table 5-5 shows, the
highest ozone concentration is reduced  over 3 percent due to the 15 percent VOC
reduction. The maximum decrease in the afternoon hourly ozone concentrations due
to the lower RVP is approximately 6 ppb (see Appendix E-3).
Effects of Alternative Fuels

Isopleths of maximum daily ozone predictions for the ethanol-blend scenario
(scenario 5) and ETBE blend scenario (scenario 6) are shown in Figures 5-23 and 5-24,
respectively. The corresponding difference plots for these two scenarios versus
scenario 2 are given in Figures 5-25 and 5-26. Similar isopleth plots of afternoon
hourly ozone concentrations for scenarios 5 and 6, and difference plots for these two
scenarios versus scenario 2 are given in Appendixes E-4 through E-7. When compared
to the low RVP scenario, the use of a 50 percent market penetration of a 10 percent
ethanol-blended fuel with the 1  psi exemption results in no increase in the highest
ozone concentration (Table 5-5) and a slight increase in the maximum daily ozone
concentrations (less than 1 ppb) downwind of the location of the highest ozone con-
centration (see Figure 5-25).  In the early afternoon (1200-1400) any increases in
hourly ozone concentrations are compensated by an equal decrease (Appendix E-6).
Later in the afternoon there are more increases due to the ethanol blend although
these increases in hourly ozone concentrations are always very small (less than
1 ppb).

As Figure 5-26 shows, the use of an ETBE blend results in a larger benefit (decrease
of 0.8 ppb) than disbenefit (increase of 0.6 ppb) in the changes in maximum daily
ozone concentrations when compared to the low RVP scenario. The highest ozone
concentration is reduced by 1  ppb (Table 5-5). Further evidence of the benefits of
using an ETBE blend for reducing ozone concentrations can be seen in the difference
plots of hourly ozone concentrations in Appendix  E-7. Maximum decreases in hourly
ozone concentrations resulting from use of an ETBE blend always exceed any
increases.
Effects of Running Losses

Assuming a higher estimate of running loss emissions (scenario 7) results in an
increase in the maximum ozone concentration by as much as 7 ppb (Figures 5-27 and
5-28 and Appendixes E-8 and E-9).  The predicted regional maximum ozone concen-
tration increases by about 5 ppb (3 percent) due to the 26 percent increase in VOC
                                        135

-------
emissions when compared to the high RVP scenario (Table 5-5).  Clearly, more data
must be collected to provide a better estimate of the amount and speciation of
running loss emissions.
SIP Control Strategies

The two SIP control strategies (SIP A and B) represent a 40 percent VOC reduction
from scenario 1. However, they differ in the method of VOC reduction.  In SIP
scenario A, the 40 percent VOC reduction is obtained by switching to a low RVP fuel
and including an enhanced I/M program.  This results in a 15  percent reduction in
VOC emissions from scenario 1. The remainder of the 25 percent VOC reduction is
obtained by uniformly reducing VOC emissions from nonmobile area sources and
point sources.  Under SIP scenario B, the 40 percent VOC reduction from scenario 1
is obtained by reducing the most reactive VOC species first (up to 80 percent for
each species in each grid cell). The same NOX and CO emissions used in scenario 1
are used in SIP scenarios A and B.

Figures 5-29 and 5-30 show isopleths of maximum daily ozone concentrations for SIP
scenarios A and B,  respectively.  Corresponding isopleths of  afternoon hourly ozone
concentrations for  the SIP scenarios are given in Appendixes E-10 and E-ll.  Differ-
ence plots between maximum daily and afternoon hourly ozone concentrations for
the SIP scenarios and scenario 1 are  shown in Figures 5-31 and 5-32 and in Appen-
dixes E-12 and E-13.

The 40 percent reduction in SIP scenario A results in a  10 percent reduction  in the
highest ozone concentration  (Table 5-5). However, in targeting the most reactive
VOC species for reduction first (SIP  scenario B), the 40 percent VOC reduction
results in an 18 percent reduction in the highest ozone concentration. In fact, under
SIP scenario A, the region is still experiencing an exceedance of the ozone NAAQS
(i.e., the highest ozone, 14 pphm, is greater than the NAAQS of 12 pphm).  However,
under SIP scenario B the region does not experience an exceedance of the ozone
NAAQS (i.e., the highest ozone, 12 pphm, is not greater than the ozone NAAQS).

The differences in  hourly ozone concentrations for the  SIP scenarios and scenario 1
(Appendixes E-12 and E-13) suggest that targeting the most  reactive VOC species for
reduction first is approximately twice as effective at reducing ozone concentrations
as are the usual VOC emission reduction strategies.
 Preliminary Analysis of the St. Louis 1995 Emission Scenarios

 Without the large influences of the boundary conditions and the high VOC-to-NOx
 ratios that complicate the New. York UAM application, VOC emission reductions are
 much more effective in lowering ozone concentrations for the St. Louis UAM simula-
 tions.  A measure of the efficiency in ozone reduction as a function of  VOC emission
 reductions can be obtained for a given scenario by deriving a ratio of the percentage
 change between the predicted highest ozone concentration from scenario 1 to the
 88151r2 8
                                        136

-------
percentage VOC emission reductions from scenario 1. As Table 5-5 indicates, these
VOC reduction efficiency values range from 0.20 to 0.25 for almost all of the emis-
sion scenarios (e.g., a 10 percent VOC emission reduction results in approximately a
2 to 2.5 percent reduction in the peak ozone).  The exception is SIP scenario B, which
has a VOC reduction efficiency value of almost double that of all the other emission
scenarios. Thus targeting the most reactive hydrocarbon species for emission reduc-
tions is expected to be twice as effective at reducing ozone concentrations as the
usual across-the-board VOC reductions.  It appears reasonable that the reverse of
this result is also true, i.e., reducing the less reactive hydrocarbon species will not
have as beneficial an effect in reducing ozone concentrations.  Clearly, hydrocarbon
reactivity should be taken into account to the extent possible in analyzing VOC emis-
sion control strategies.
                                          137
88 151r2  8

-------
                   1SV3
i i i  |         i i
                                                             C
                                                             •H
                                                             I
                                                             'c

                                                             1
                                                             0
                                                             in
                                                            K
                                                            U
                                                            O
                    1S3M
                                      X
                                      0.
                                                                s
                                                                o
                             138
CO
00

-------
            Time : 800 - 2000 EST
        520   540    560    580    600   620
                                                                        Maximum Value = 23.52
                                                                        Minimum Value = 4.37
NORTH
640   660
680   700   720   740    760
           i i  i I  i i i  I i  i i  I
                                             SOUTH
                                                                                      4660
                                                                                       4640
                                                                                       4620
                                                                                       4600
                                                                                       4580
                                                                                    - 4560
                                                                                    - 4540
                                                                                    - 4520
                                                                                    - 4500
                                                                                    - 4480
                                                                                   30
                                                                                       4460
                Maximum  Ozone Concentration
                Evaluation 1
                Aug 8, 1980  (pphm)
          FIGUPE 5-2.  Isopleths of predicted maximum daily ozone concentrations
          (pphm)  with  superimposed  observations for the New York region on
          8  August 1980.  (* denotes location of maximum concentration value.)
88151
                                                   139

-------
        I  >  I !  | I  I  ! I  I |  I  I i  I I  |  I I
     -  HART
                             OBSERVED
                             PREDICTED
                                                                       12
                                               18
                     i  i  i i  | i  i  i r i |  i  i i  i  i |  i i  i
                  -  BRPT
                                           OBSERVED  [
                                           PREDICTED
                        12
                    TIME (HOURS)
18
         — 20    20
                                                I
                                                Q.
                                                CL
                                                K)
                                                O
24
                                                  10
                                            0      0
                                     12
                                 TIME (HOURS)
                                     18
                                                                                           30
                                                                                           20
                                                          10
                                                        24
   30
                        12
18
       i r i  i i   T i  i i  i   r r r t i    i i  i
      -  DANB
                              OBSERVED  [JJ
                              PREDICTED
               6        12        18
                    TIME (HOURS)
24
                                     12
                                 TIME (HOURS)
                                     18
                                                                                         - 10
                         Mew  York - 3/8/80 -  03  - EVALUATION RUN

          FIGURE 5-3.   Time series  of  predicted and observed hourly ozone concentrations
          at all sites in the New York modeling domain.
                                                           SYSTEMS APPLJCATIONS, INC.
88151
                  140

-------
                         12
18
                             24
         I  I I  I  | I  1  I I  I  | !  I I  I  'I  !  I I  I


                               OBSERVED  |3
                               PREDICTED 	
    20
  5
  I
  Q.
  Q.
  IO
  O
    10
                                              30
                                              20
                                              10
6        12

     TIME (HOURS)
                                   18
         24
                                                                                           — 10
     12        18

TIME (HOURS)
                                                                                            24
                         12
        i i  i i  i  | i  i  i i  i |

      -  MDTN
                                                                              OBSERVED  [JJ
                                                                              PREDICTED —
               6         12         18
                     TIME (HOURS;
                         New  fork -  3/8/80 - 03 -  EVALUAT ON  =!UN
          FIGURE  5-3.   Continued.
                                                             SYSTEMS A=PL CATIONS, INC.
88151
                                                     141

-------
                                                                         12
                                                                             18
                             24
                                                       1  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I I  I  I '  |  I I  I  T

                                                                              OBSERVED  0]
                                                                              PREDICTED  —
                                                                                              20
   I   I  I  I '  I  I I  r |  I  I I  I  I |  i  | I  I  (

-  5TRF
                         OBSERVED   0]
                         PREDICTED  —
               6         12         18
                     TIME (HOURS)
                                       24       0
6         12        16
     TIME (HOURS)
    30
                         12
      i  >  | i  i   i  i |  i  i i  i
-  DMM
                         OBSERVED
                         PREDICTED
                                                       I  I  I I  I I  I  I
                                                     V EORG
                                                                               OBSERVED  CO
                                                                               PREDICTED  —
                         12
                     TIME (HOURS)
                                                         6         12
                                                               TIME (HOURS)
                          \ew  fork  - 5/8/50  - 03 - EVALUATION RUN
          FIGURE 5-3.   Continued.
                                                             SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, IN
38151
                                         142

-------
                          12
18
24
       -  LIND
                                OBSERVED
                                PREDICTED
    20
  I
  0.
  Q.
  to
  O
    10
       _>  i i	i
                                               30   30
12
18
                    1  I  I  I I  I I  I  I I  I  |  I i  I  I 1  I  I I  I  T

                   r  NEWK
                                            OBSERVED  HI
                                            PREDICTED  	
                                               20   20
               5

               Q.
               0.
               rj
               O

           10    10
                          12         18
                     TIME (HOURS)
          24
                                               0     0
                                                            30
                                                            20
                                                                                               10
                   6         12         18
                        TIME (HOURS)
                    24
    30
                          12
                                    18        24
                                OBSERVED  CD
                                PREDICT:
                                            OBSERVED  [0
                                            DPEDICTED —
                                                                                             — 10
                                                                6         12         16

                                                                     TIME (HOURS)
                                                          24
                          New iofV -  8/3/80 - 03 -  EVALUATION RUM
          FIGURE 5-3.   Continued.
                                                              i''STEMS APPLICATIONS, INC
                                                143
88151

-------
                         12        18
   20
 2
 I
 0.
 Q.
 fl
 O
         I I  I  I I  I  I  I I

        NBRW
                               OBSERVED  CD
                               PREDICTED -
                                           ED
                                                    30
                                                                   12         18
                                                  I  I 1 I  |  I I  i  I I  |  I I  '  I F  | T T I  1  I

                                               -  MORR
                                                                        OBSERVED  CD
                                                                        PREDICTED  	 •
                                       20    20
                                           i

                                           CL
                                           O
                                           O

                                       10    10
                         12        18

                     TIME (HOURS)
                                      24
                                              0      0

                                                                                               30
                                                                                               20
                                                                                                10
6         12         18

     TIME (HOURS)
24
   30
                         12        18
i  r T  r i [  T  rii  i (  '  i \\  r j  i  i i  r


                        OBSERVED CD
                        PREDICTED 	
   20 -
 •Q.
 Q_
 O
    10 -
24       0
  30    30
                                                                   12
                    18
24
                                                        T  \ I  I  i |  I  T 1  I  I I  i  I '  I  I |  I  I  I I  I

                                                       -  HEMP
                                                                                OBSERVED  CD
                                               20    20
               6         12        18

                     TIME (HOURS)
                                                                   12         18
                                                              TIME (HOURS;
                          New rork  -  8/8/80 - C3 -  EVALUAT ON RUN
          FIGURE 5-3.  Continued.
                                                              SYSTEMS ADPLCA~ONS, INC
                                                144
88151

-------
                      i  i i  i  i i  i  r i  i  | i  i  i i  i |  i  i i  i


                                            OBSERVED Q
                                            PREDICTED —
                               OBSERVED  CD
                               PREDICTED  —
               6         12         18

                    TIME (HOURS)
24
                            6         12         18

                                 TIME (HOURS)
                                                24
    30
                         12
18
24
                            12
18
                               OBSERVED  [JJ
                               PREDICTED  —
                         12

                    TIME (HCURS)
                                      12

                                 TIME (HOURS)
                         New  York - 8/8/30 - 03 -  EVALUATION RUN


       FIGURE 5-3.   Continued.
                                                             SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS. INC.
88151
                                              145

-------
                         12
18
24
12        18
        I  I! I  |  I I  I  I I  |  i I  I  I  I |  I I  I  I  I

     -  NYC4
                               OBSERVED  CD
                               PREDICTED  	
                      I  I  I  I |  I  I t  I  I |  I  I i  I   |  I  I :  I

                   -  NYC5
                                             OBSERVED
                                             PREDICTED
                         12
                    TIME (HOURS)
                                       12        18
                                  TIME (HOURS)
                                                                                               30
                               OBSERVED   CD
                               PREDICTED
                                             OBSERVED  [JJ
                                             PREDICTED
                         12
                    TIME (HOURS;
          24       0
                             12
                         TIME (HOURS)
          18
                         New  'fork  - 8/8/30 -  03  -  EVALUATION RUN
      FIGURE 5-3.   Continued.
                                                              SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, INC
88151
               146

-------
                              OBSERVED  CD
                              PREDICTED —
                                                       OBSERVED   CD
                                                       PREDICTED  —
                                                                           i  I i  i  i   i ...i i  i V
                        12        18

                    TIME (HOURS)
                    24
6         12         18

     TIME (HOURS)
24
  30
12         18
                                            24
   20
 2
 X
 CL
•Q.
O
        I  I I  i

        POLG
                              OBSERVES  [Jj
                              PREDICTED —
                     20    20 -
              6         12         18

                    TIME (HOURS)
                    24
                                              10    10 -
                                       6          12

                                            TIME (HOURS)
                    13
                             24
                         New  fork  - 8/8/80 -  03  -  EVALUAT ON  RUN
     FIGURE 5-3.   Concluded.
                                                             SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, INC.
 I151
                                               147

-------
                             30
                                                 12
18
24
                                1  I I  I I  I I  1 I  I I  I I  I  I I  I I  I li I  r
                               - CONN
                                                      OBSERVED  [3
                                                      PREDICTED —
                             20
                           5
                           0.
                           a.
          30
          20
                                                                    10
                                                 12
                                            TIME (HOURS)
18
24
                              Average  Observed =7.9

                              Average  Predicted =10.7
                              Bias =   -2.8

                              Correlation Coefficient = 0.996

                              Peak Predicted/Peak Observed =1.27
                              (at hour 13)
                          FIGURE 5-4.  Statistical performance measures and
                          time series of predicted and observed hourly averaged
                          ozone concentrations averaged over four sites (STRF,
                          BBPT, DPBY, and NHVN) in southern Connecticut.
                                          148
88151

-------
                    20.00
                    15.00
                  a
                  c.
                    10.00
                  Uj
                  (X
                  a.
                     5.00
                           I  I  I   I
         I  I  I  I
x   X*   *&ป*;//<-     '
 * / r **  #** *r yj
                                  *  /
                              *%%,
                              fฃ&? i  ;  i  i  i
5.00
               10.00
                                                        15.00
20.00
             G CF THE FFCEAElLlfr DEKSlTf  FINCTICK

                          CESEPVEC      PREDICTED

              AVERAGE
         STANDARD DEVIATION
              SrEKNESS
              KURTCSIS
          OTHER MEASURES
              MEDIAN
           UPPER &LARTJLE
           LOkER &LARTRE
            MIMMliM VALUE
            MAXIMLM VALUE
6. 15970
4.46305
0.70<07
0.40520
5.600CC
9.300CO
2.200CO
0. 100CO
24.60COC
9.26025
6. 17426
C.C4C50
-1.35550
9.7CCOO
14.77000
3. 16COC
c.ceocc
21.37000
                          STILL  CF  PPED3CTICN PARAMETERS
                          CCRRELATICN  COEFFICIENT OF FRELICTEt
                          VERSUS OBSERVED   C.6CC
                          THE BOUNDS OF  THE CORRELATION AT THE
                          CONFIDENCE LEv'EL OF C.CEC ARE
                          LOW BOUND C.767 HIOH BOUND C.629
                          RATIO  OF  OVER  TO UNDER PREDICTIONS
                          PERCENT OF OVER PREDICTIONS
                          GREATER THAN 2CC PERCENT OF ThE
                          OBSERVED   30.392
                          PERCENT OF UNDER PREDICTIONS
                          UESS THAN EC PERCENT OF THE
                          OBSERVED   9.ece
                                                        •5.20C
      FIGURE 5-5a.  Scatterplot of predicted versus  observed hourly ozone concentrations
       (matched by time and locations) for New York region on 8 August 1980 (N = 520) .
88151
                                           149

-------
        0.20 -
                  -11.00   -6.60   -2.20
                      RESIDUAL  'CES-PRED:
                         2.20
                             6.60
                     11. OC
            THE EINSIZE ECLALS  2.200
RESIDUAL ANAL'SIS

        AVERAGE
  S'ANDARD DEVIA"!
        SfEWNESS
        rUP'OSIS
   G'HER MEASURES
        MEDIAN
    UPPER QUART HE
    LOWER QUARTILE
     MINIMUM VALUE
     MAXIMUM VALUE
ON
-3. 12072
3.73333
-0.22626
0.18046

-2.78000
-0.47000
-5.61000
-14.96000
10.21000
BIAS CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
AT THE G.C5GC LEVEL
LOWER BOUND -3.6722
UPPER BOUND -2.S692

STD RESIDUAL CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
AT THE 0.0500 LEVEL
LOWER BOUND 12.6228
UPPER ECUND 15.4629

THE MEASURES CF GROSS ERROR
THE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IS 4.66
THE AVERAGE ABSOLUTE ERROR IS 3.64

VARIOUS MEASURES OF RELATIVE VARIABILITY
OBSERVATION COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
                              0.727&
RESIDUAL COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
                              0.6061
RATIO OF RESIDUAL TO OBSERVED ST. DEV.
                              0.6328
 FIGURE 5-5b.   Residual analysis of observed minus predicted hourly ozone
 concentrations for New York region on 8  August 1980 (N = 520).
                                   150

-------
                 20.00
                 15.00
               e
               .c
               a.
               a.
                 10. 00
               tx
               H.
                  5.00
                                5.00       !0.00       15.00
                                       OBSERVED  pphr,
                                               I  ii  i  I  ii   I  I  I  ii  i  i
20.00
                                                     STILL CF PREDICTION PARAMETERS
                                                     CORRELA'ION COEFFICIEN- OF PPEDIC'ED
                                                     VERSUS OBSERVED   0.576
                                                     'HE BOUNDS OF THE CORRELATION A" 'HE
                                                     CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF 0.05C ARE
                                                     LOW BOUND 0.266 HIGH BOUND 0.778
                                                     RATJO CF OVER T0 UNDER PREDICTIONS  28.000
                                                     PERCEN' OF OVER PREDIC'ICNS
                                                     GREATER 'HAN 200 PERCENT OF "HE
                                                     OBSERVED   10.345
                                                     PERCENT OF UNDER PREDICTIONS
                                                     LESS THAN 50 PERCEN" OF 'HE
                                                     OBSERVED   0.000
                 * ' i ^ '.J k.    t "I ,'-*'-' ^ W W      &**ซJ/WWW


   FIGURE 5-6a.   Scatterplot of predicted versus observed maximum daily ozone concentrations

    (matched by location but not time)  for 8 August 1980  (N = 29).
MENTS OF 'HE PROBABILl'r DENS
OBSERVED
AVERAGE 12.05171
STANDARD DEVIA'ION 3.84678
SrEWNESS 0.93123
njR'OSIS 1.85087
OTHER MEASURES
MEDIAN 11.70000
UPPER QUARTJLE 13.30000
LOWER OUAR'ILE 9.50000
MINIMUM VALUE 5. ' 0000
MAXIMUM VALUE 24.60000
IT* FUNC'ION
PREDIC'ED
17.43653
2.41584
-0.34467
-0.65029

17.48000
18.59000
15. 18000
12.01000
21.37000
                                              151
58151

-------
                     0. 40 -
                                  -9.30
                                  RESIDUAL
                              -3. 10
                            I06S-PRED)
                                            3. 10
                  9.30
                          •HE  BINSIZE EQUALS   3.100
REC1DLAL ANALYSIS

        AVERAGE
  STANDARD DEVIA
              ION
     KURTCSIS
CTHER MEASURES
     MEDIAN
 UPPER GLi/RT ILE
 LCHER CbARTILE
  MINIMUM VALUE
  MAXIMUM VALLE
                                   -5.26463
                                   3.15023
                                   -C. 25710
                                   2.01413

                                   -5.56CGO
                                   -4. 10COO
                                   -7.C2COO
                                   -14.56000
                                   3.2-50CO
BIAS CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
AT 'HE 0.0500 LEVEL
LOWER BOUND -6.8164
UPPER BOUND -3.9513

S"D RESIDUAL CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
A' "HE 0.0500 LEVEL
                                           BOUND 6.763;
                                     UPPER BOUND 36.2557

                                     "HE MEASURES OF GROSS ERROR
                                     ~HE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IS 6.2:
                                     "HE AVERAGE ABSOLU'E ERROR IS 5.61

                                     VARIOUS MEASURES OF RELATIVE VARIABILI'
                                     OBSERVATION COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
                                                                   0.5192
                                     RESIDUAL COEFFICIENT OF VARIA'ION
                                                                   0.2614
                                     RATIO OF RESIDUAL TO OBSERVED ST. DEV.
                                                                   0.8:89
              FIGURE  5-6b.   Residual analysis of observed minus predicted maximum daily
              ozone concentrations for 8 August 1980 (N = 29).
                                              152
88151

-------
         FIGURE  5-7.  The  St. Louis modeling domain showing the location of the RAPS
         ozone monitors.   (Source:  Cole et al., 1983)
88151
                                            153

-------
            Time : 800 -  2000 GST

        706                    726
       20 -
     V)
NORTH
        746
                           Maximum value = 24.35
                           Minimum Value  = 7.73
766
                                                      10
                                             SOUTH
                                       -4-316
                                                                                    - 4-296
                                                                                    - 4-276
                                                                                    - 4256
                                                                                       4236
151
          FIGURE 5-8.   Isopleths of predicted maximum  daily ozone concentrations  (pphm)
          with superimposed maximum daily observations for the St. Louis region on
          13 July 1976.   (* denotes location of maximum concentration value.)
                                                154

-------
  30
                       12
18        24
  20
S
CL
Q.
  10
      i i  r i i  | T  i  i n i  i  i i  i I  i T i  i i  I
    -  105
                            OBSERVED  Q
                            PREDICTED  	  •
                                           30
                                           20    20 -
i  imm I  i i  i  i i  I i  i  i i  i I  i  i i  i m
      6        12        18       24"
           TIME (HOURS)
                    i i  i  i i  I i  i  i i  i I  i  i i  i  i I  i i  i i  i
                  -  106
                                          OBSERVED
                                          PREDICTED
                                           10    10-
                                                       - 10
                                                            6        12        18
                                                                 TIME (HOURS)
                                                        24
                                          2430    30ฐ
         i  i i  | i  i i  i  i |  i i  i  i i  I i  i  i i  i
    -  1C7
                    i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i  i i  i
                  -  108
                            OBSERVED  El
                            PREDICTED
                                           OBSERVED  Q
                                           PREDICTED
                       12
                  TIME (HOURS)
                                     12         18
                                TIME (HOURS)
                                                                                 24
                      ST. LOUIS - 7/13/76  - 03 -  EVALUATION  RUN

    FIGURE 5-9 .  Time series of predicted and observed hourly ozone concentrations at
    all sites  in the St. Louis modeling domain.
                                                          SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS. INC.
    88151
                                               155

-------
                    12
                                        i i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i  i  i

                                      -  102
    i i  i  i I  i  i i  i  i |  i i  i  i i  I  i i  i  i i

 -  101
                         OBSERVED
                         PREDICTED
                                                               OBSERVED
                                                               PREDICTED
                    12

               TIME (HOURS)
18
                                                6         12        18

                                                     TIME (HOURS)
                    12
  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i

 -  103
                          OBSERVED  [Jj
                          PREDICTED
24       0
  30    30
                                                6
                                      12
                   18
24
                            - 20    20
                                            5
                                            I
                                            Q.
                                            a.
                                       — 10    10
                                       1 I  I T I  |  II  I I  i  | (  1  I f  1^ \  I  II  !


                                                               OBSERVED  CD
                                                               PREDICTED 	  -
6         12

     TIME (HOURS)
                              18
          24
                                                            I  I i  I  i I  i  I i  I  i I  i  I i  I
                                                                                         30
                                                                                         20
                                                                                         10
6         12        18

     TIME (HOURS)
                    ST.  LOUIS -  7/13/76  - 03 -  EVALUATION RUN


 FIGURE 5-9.   Continued.
                                                        SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, INC.
88151
                                             156

-------
  30
                              OBSERVED   CD
                              PREDICTED  —-
                                                30
                                                                         12
                                                                                18
                                                 24
                                                     I  I  I i  |  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I  I I  |  I 1  I  1 T


                                                  r                        OBSERVED  CD
                                                                           PREDICTED  — •
                                           - 20    20
                                                 a.
                                                 CL
                                                 K)
                                                 O
                                           - 10    10
              6         12         18
                   TIME (HOURS)
                                         24
                                                                                              30
                                                                                           20
                                                                                           10
                             12
                        TIME (HOURS)
                    18
24
  30
                        12
                               18
24
        I I  I  I j  I  I I  T

    -   111
  20
CL
CL
lO
O
  10
ct 3CDD] *  '  ' I
                              OBSERVED
                              PREDICTED
                                           i
                                          30
                             .24,
                                          20    20-
                     12

                TIME (HOURS)
                                  18
24
                                                                           OBSERVED  UJ
                                                                           PREDICTED  —
                                             10    10 -
                                                                                            — 10
6         12         18

     TIME (HOURS)
                                                                                            24
                       ST.  LOUIS  -  7/13/76  - 03 - EVALUATION  RUN


     FIGURE 5-9.   Continued.
                                                            SYSTEMS APPL'CATIONS, INC.
                                                  157
    88151

-------
                       12
      i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i  i i  i

    -  113
                             OBSERVED  Q
                             PREDICTED —=
       CD i  i i  I "r1 i  i  i i  I  i i  i i  i  I i  i  i i  i
          24       0
           30    30
                   6
12
18
24
                    T  I  I I  I  | I  I I  I  I |  1  IT 1  I I  1  I I  T


                                            OBSERVED  CO
                                            PREDICTED ——
                                          - 20    20
                                                I
                                                CL
                                                O.
                                          -  10    10
              6        12        18
                   TIME (HOURS)
                                                                                            30
                                                           20
                                                           10
                            6         12        18
                                 TIME (HOURS)
                                                24
  30
                       12
18
  20
i
Q_
Q.
  10
      I I  I  I I  I  i I  I  I I  I  I I  i I  I  I I  I  I I  I


                             OBSERVED  D
                             PREDICTED -=-
24       0
  30    30
12
18
      i  i i  i  i I  i i  i  i i  I  i i  i  I i  I  i i  i i  i
           20    20 -
               Z

               0.
               0.
                                             10    10 -
              6         12

                   TIME (HOURS)
18        24
                    I  I  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I I  I  I i  I  I I  i  I

                   -  116
                                            OBSERVED   CD
                                            PREDICTED  —
                                  TIME (HOURS)
                       ST. LOUIS  - 7/13/76 -  03  -  EVALUATION  RUN
     FIGURE 5-9.   Continued.
     88151
                                                            SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, INC.
                                                 158

-------
  30
              6
12
18
24
  20
2

O.
ฃL
      I  I I  I I  |  I I  I  I I  |  I I  I  I I  |  I I  I I  T


                             OBSERVED  CD
                             PREDICTED  	
           i i  I  i i  i  I i  I  i i  i i  i  I i  i  i I  i
                     30    30
12        18
24
                                             20    20
                        0.
                        G-
                                             10    10
                             L-  118
              6        12        18

                   TIME (HOURS)
                    24
                                                      OBSERVED   [JJ
                                                      PREDICTED  	
                                                                                             30
                                                                     20
                                                                                             10
                             6         12        18

                                  TIME (HOURS)
                                                24
  30
                       12
          18
                                      12        18
2430    30ฐ
      i  i i  i i  I  i i  i  i i  I  i i  i i  i  I i  i  i

     -  119
                              I  I  I I  !  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I I  I  I I  I  I I  I  I

                             -  120
                                                      OBSERVED   CD
                                                      PREDICTED
                             OBSERVED
                             PREDICTED
                       12

                   TIME (HOURS)
                                      6         12        18

                                            TIME  (HOURS)
                                                          24
                       ST. LOUIS - 7/13/76 -  03  -  EVALUATION  RUN

     FIGURE 5-9.  Continued.
                                                           SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, INC.
      88151
                                                   159

-------
 I  I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I I  I  I I

-  121
                       OBSERVED  0]
                       PREDICTED  —
                                   - 10
         6        12

              TIME (HOURS)
                  ST. LOJIS -  7/13/76  - 03 -  EVALUATION RUN


FIGURE 5-9.  Concluded.
                                                    SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS. INC.
88151
160

-------
                 20.00 -
                 15.00 -
               a
               a.
               <-> 10. 00 -
               cr
               a.
                  5.00 -
                        I  I  I  I    I  I   I  I    I   I  I  I     I  I  I  i     I  i  i   i

                                                              x
5.00
                                     10.00
                                  CECERVCD  i
                                                     15.00
20.00
      AVERAGE
STANDARD  DEVIATION
 OTHER MEASURES
      MEDIAN
  UPPER CUARTILE
  LCKER OLARTILE
   MINIMUM VALUE
   MAXIMUM VALUE
LITv CENC
SERVED
6.77643
4.65695
C. 66694
-0.47257
4.9CCCC
1C.6CCCC
2.9CCCC
C.20CCO
22.2CCCC
ITY FUNCTION
PREDICTED
7.51675
4.99563
C. 69536
-C.C1636
6.79CCC
1C.57CCC
3.42CCC
C. 11CCC
23.37CCC
                                                     SKILL CF FREDICTICN  PARAMETERS
                                                     CORRELATION  COEFFICIENT  OF  PREDICTED
                                                     VERSUS OBSERVED    C.914
                                                     ThE BOUNDS  CF  THE  CCRRELATICK  A'  'HE
                                                     CONFIDENCE  LEVEL  CF  C.C5C  ARE
                                                     LOh ECUND C.691  hIGh ECLNC  C.5!2
                                                     RATIO CF OVER  TC  UNDER  FRECICTICNS   2.442
                                                     PERCENT CF  OVER  PREDICTIONS
                                                     GREATER THAN 20C  PERCENT OF THE
                                                     OBSERVED   6.792
                                                     PERCENT CF  UNDER  FREDIC'ICNS
                                                     UESS THAN 5C PERCENT OF
                                                     OBSERVED   4.906
   FIGURE 5-10a.  Scatterplot of predicted versus observed hourly ozone concentrations
   (matched by time and locations)  for St. Louis region  on 13 July 1976 (N = 265).
88151'
                                              161

-------
                   0.40 -
      -6.50    -3.90    -1.30
         RESIDUAL ICES-PREDJ

THE BINSIZE  EQUALS   1.300
                                                      1. 30
             3.90
6.50
           RESIDUAL ANALYSIS

                   AVERAGE       -0.73855
             s'ANCARD DEV:A-:ON  2.05:25
                   SfEWNESS      0.40933
                   rUR-'OSIS      2.00005
              CTHER MEASURES
                   MEDIAN        -0.86000
               UPPER QUARTILE    0.25000
               LOWER QUAR'ILE    -1.92000
                MINIMUM VALUE    -8.620CO
                MAXIMUM VALUE    7.36000
BIAS CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
AT THE 0.0500 LEVEL
LOWER BGUND -1.^451
UPPER BOUND -0.0316
STD RESIDUAL CONFIDENCE INTERVAL
AT THE 0.0500 LEVEL
LOWER BOUND 3.6681
UPPER BOUND 4.8841
THE MEASURES OF GROSS ERROR
THE ROOT MEAN SOUARE ERROR IS 2.18
THE AVERAGE ABSOLUTE ERROR IS 1.67

VARIOUS MEASURES OF RELATIVE VARlA6ILITf
OBSERVATION COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
                              0.7166
RESIDUAL COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
                              0.3026
RATIO OF RESIDUAL TO OBSERVED ST. DEV.
                              0.4222
            FIGURE 5-10b.  Residual analysis of observed minus predicted hourly ozone
            concentrations for St. Louis region on 13 July 1976  (N  = 265).
88151
                                              162

-------
                20.00
                 15.00
               e
               c.
               a.
               o.
                 10.00
               tr
               a_
                 5.00
                        1  I  (  I  |  1  I   1  I
                                                                         I	I
5.00
   :0.00

CESERVEC
                                                     15.00
20.00
HCrENTS CF THE FRCBAEI
CE
AVERAGE
STANDARD DEVIATION
c \ E^NE^*--
rLRTCSIS
CTHER MEASLRES
MEDIAN
LPFER CLART1LE
LCUER CLARTILE
PINIfLP VALLE
MAXI^Lf VALLE
LITY DENS
SERVED
15.C1427
2.65243
1. 1C626
1.55511

14.5CCCC
15.30COC
13.7CCCC
10.6CCCC
22.2CCOC
ITY FLNC'ICN
PREDICTED
15.96999
4 . 164C4
C . 426 4C
-1.2C929

15.C6CCC
17.39CCO
12.C2CCC
1C.67CCC
23.37CCC
                                                     SflLL  CF  FREDICTICK  FARAf'ETEFr.
                                                     CCRRELATICN CCEFFICIEK'  CF  FFELIC'ED
                                                     VERSLS CESERVED    C.d76
                                                     THE  ECLNDS  CF  THE  CCRRELA'ICN  .A'  ThE
                                                     CCNFIDENCE  LEVEL  CF  C.C5C  ARE
                                                     LCk  ECLND C.227  hlCh ECLKL  C.5ฃฃ
                                                     RAT1C  CF  CVER  TC  LNDER  PREDIC'ICKS   :
                                                     PERCENT CF  CVER  FREDICTICKS
                                                     CREATER ThAN 20C  PERCENT CF  ThE
                                                     CESERVEC    C.COC
                                                     FERCENT CF  LNDER  FREC1CT1CNS
                                                     LESS THAN 5C PERCENT CF  'HE
                                                     CESERVEC    C.CCC
                                                    CCC
   FIGURE 5-lla.  Scatterplot of predicted versus observed maximum daily ozone concentra-
   tions (matched by location but  not time)  for 13 July 1976  (N = 14).
88151
                                          163

-------
                      0. 40
                      0. 30
                      0.20
                    ^0.10
                    e.
-6.0D   -3.6C   -1.2C

   RESIDUAL  ICBS-PRED,
                                                        1.20
             3.50
6.CC
                          'HE EINSIZE  EQLALS  1.20C
             RESIDUAL  ANALYSIS

                     AVERAGE       -0.95571
                STANDARD DEVIATION  3.C8663
                     SrEWNESS      -0.71570
                     KUPTOSIS      -0.38M3
                 OTHER  MEASURES
                     MEDIAN        -1.^2000
                  UPPER OU'.RTILE    0.2600C
                  LOWER CU/RTILE    -3.43000
                   MINIMUM  VALUE    -7.92000
                   MAXIMUM  VALUE    3.08000
ETAS CONFIDENCE IN'ERYAL
A' 'HE O.C500 LEVEL
LOWER BOUND -3.2883
UPPER BOUND :.3769

S~D RES:LUAL CONFIDENCE IN
A" 'HE O.C5CO LEVEL
LOWER BOUND 5.6337
UPPER BOUND 20.32:6

THE MEASURES OF GROSS ERROR
*HE ROD' MEAN SCUARE ERROR IS 3.12
-HE AVERAGE AESOLU'E ERROR IS 2.26

VARIOUS MEASURES OF RELATIVE VARIABILI
OBSERVA'ICN CCEFFICIEN' OF VARIA'ION
                              0. 1767
RESIDUAL COEFFICIEN' OF VARIA'ION
                              0.2056
RATIO OF RESIDUAL "0 OBSERVED S~. DEV.
                              I.1637
              FIGURE 5-llb.  Residvial analysis of observed minus predicted maximum daily
              ozone concentrations  for 13 July 1976  (N = 14) .
88151
                                             164

-------
1SV3
                                                             o
                                                             00
                                                             V)

                                                             Q-.
                                                             D
                                                             <

                                                             00
                                                             00
                                                             LJ

                                                             O
                                                             O
                                                             C)
                                                             O
                                                             L-
                                                             o>
                                                             u
                                                             o
                                                             o
                                                             o
                                                             o
                                                             r,
                                                             O
1S3M
                                                             (T3
                                                             CM
                                                              I
                                                             LO
        165
                                                                        CO
                                                                        CO

-------
1S3M
                                                          O
                                                          CO
                                                          a>
                                                           en
                                                          oo
                                                          LJ

                                                          O
                                                          O
                                                          CM
                                                           0)
                                                           O
                                                           O
                                                           c
                                                           o
                                                           O
                                                           o
                                                           a
                                                          a.
                                                           ro
                                                          CM
 I
LD
                                                          LJ
                                                           o
                                                                     OD
                                                                     CO
       166

-------
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         00
                                                                                                         05
                                           1SV3
                                                                                                         00
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         Q
                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         o
If!
                                           1S3M
                                                                                                         c—
                                                                                                         <\J
                                                                                                         o
 rc
CVI
                                                                                                         I
                                                                                                        in
                                                  167
                                                                                                                  CO
                                                                                                                  oo

-------
     I  I  I  I  I  1  1  I  I  I  1  1  I  I  I  I  I  I   i  i
I    I   I   I    1   I   I    J   I   I    I   I   I    I
                                                                     O
                                                                     oo
                                                                      C7>
                                                                     00
                                                                     (fi
                                                                     LJ

                                                                     O
                                                                     O
                                                                      O

                                                                      ^
                                                                      cu
                                                                      O
                                                                      O
                                                                      c
                                                                      O
                                                                     JD
                                                                      w
                                                                      O
                                                                      O
                                                                      O
   1S3M
                                                                      ฃ
                                                                      CL)
                                                                      C.
                                                                      O
                                                                      C
                                                                      O
                                                                      o
                                                                      OJ
                                                                      o
                                                                     O.
                                                                      rtJ
                                                                     CM
                                                                     O
           168
                                                                                CO
                                                                                oo

-------
                                                                   O
                                                                   oo
                                                                   cr>
                                                                    if)
                                                                   00
                                                                   CO
                                                                   LJ

                                                                   O
                                                                   O
                                                                    O
                                                                    O
                                                                    c
                                                                    o
                                                                   o
                                                                   o
                                                                   o
1S3M
                                                                   O

                                                                   r;
                                                                   o
                                                                   .^
                                                                   13
                                                                   JD
 o


-t-*
 r^


 O


Q_



 re

l-H
 I
LO

UJ



O
       169
                                                                              CO
                                                                              oo

-------
                                                               O
                                                               00
                                                               (7)
1S3M
                                                               00
                                                               LJ

                                                               O
                                                               O
                                                                o>
                                                                O
                                                                O
                                                                c
                                                                o
                                                                JO
                                                                ^
                                                                D
                                                                U
                                                                O
                                                                OJ
                                                                C
                                                                o>
                                                                c
                                                                o
                                                                c
                                                                o
                                                                o

                                                                c
                                                                1>
                                                                o
                                                                5
                                                               CL
                                                               CM
 4
LT>
                                                               cr
                                                               D
                                                               o
          170
                                                                         oo
                                                                         00

-------
1SV3
                                                             o
                                                             CO
                                                              CO
                                                             00
                                                             CO
                                                             LJ

                                                             o
                                                             o
                                                             (O
                                                              0;
                                                              O
                                                              o
                                                              c
                                                              o
                                                              -Q

                                                              C
                                                              >,
                                                              O

                                                              r^

                                                              O
1S3M
                                                             CL
                                                              ro
                                                             c\j
                                                             ID

                                                             u
         171
                                                                      CD
                                                                      CO

-------
1SV3
                                                            00
                                                             a*
                                                            OO
                                                            O
                                                            O
                                                             0)
                                                             O
                                                             O
                                                             c
                                                             O
                                                             n
                                                             v_
                                                             O
                                                             O
                                                             O
1S3M
                                                             O

                                                             r^
                                                             5
                                                             c
                                                             o
                                                             cu
                                                             0.
                                                             (D
                                                             C\J
                                                              I
                                                             LO
                                                             O
         172
                                                                    ao
                                                                    CD

-------
                                                           o
                                                           oo
1SV3
                                                            C7-
                                                           00


                                                           h-"
                                                           CO
                                                           LJ

                                                           O
                                                           O
                                                            o
                                                            O
                                                            c
                                                            o
                                                            O
                                                            o
                                                            o
                                                            o
IS3M
                                                           CM
                                                            I
                                                           un
         173
                                                                     00
                                                                     CO

-------
8
to
         
                                                                                                             O
                                                                                                             0>
                                                                                                             Q_
                                                                                                             (O
                                                                                                            CM
                                                                                                             u
                                                                                                             tt:
                                                                                                             —>
                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                             iT
                                                     174
                                                                                                                        oo
                                                                                                                        CO

-------
I    I   I    I   I    !   I    1
                                      1S3M
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     00
                                                                                                     O)
                                                                                                      V)
                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                                     u

                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     0)
                                                                                                     u
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                      c
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                     _Q
                                                                                                      t_
                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                      CJ
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                     TD
                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                     ZJ
                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     C
                                                                                                     O
 c

 o


CL



CM
t—(
 I
in

LJ

3>
O
                                               175
                                                                                                                 CO
                                                                                                                 CO

-------
o
ID

-------
    1SV3
i  i  i  I i  i  i  I  t  t i  i  i  i  i
 i   i   i   i    I   I   i   i   i   i
                                                                 o
                                                                 00
                                                                  (ฃ>
                                                                  1>
                                                                  C7>
                                                                  13
                                                                 00
                                                                 LJ

                                                                 O
                                                                 O
                                                                 rj
                                                                  'J
                                                                  o
                                                                  X
                                                                 o
                                                                  O
                                                                 .0
    1S3M
                                                                 0.
                                                                  I
                                                                 ID
            177
                                                                            CO
                                                                            co

-------
                                                         o
                                                         00
                                                          rs


                                                         00

                                                         h-"

                                                         LJ

                                                         O
                                                         O
                                                         CJ
                                                          O
1S3M
                                                         CM
 I
ID
                                                         LJ
        178
                                                                 oo
                                                                 OD

-------
                                           I  I  I  t  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I   I  I  I  I   <  I  I t  i
                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               00
                                                                                                               GO
                                                                                                               3
                                                                                                               er-
                                                                                                               rs
                                                                                                               00
                                                                                                               UJ

                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               CD
                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               X

                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               o


                                                                                                               Ij
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               -O

                                                                                                               "o


                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               6
IT)
                                             1S3M
                                                                                                               CVJ
                                                                                                                I
                                                                                                               LD
                                                      179
                                                                                                                        CD
                                                                                                                        03

-------
I   I   I   I       I    I   I   I   I   I   I   I    I
                                                                o
                                                                00
                                                                 CO
                                                                 3
                                                                OO
                                                                LU
                                                                O
                                                                o
                                                                 o
                                                                 o
   1S3M
                                                                 0>
                                                                 4—*

                                                                 E


                                                                 "o

                                                                 o




                                                                 r;
                                                                 O
                                                                 0)
                                                                 Q_
CM
T—1
 I

LJ
cr:

O
          180
                                                                          co
                                                                          00

-------
                                                            O
                                                            oo
                                                            CD
                                                           00
                                                           LJ

                                                           O
                                                           O
                                                            o
                                                            O
                                                            x
                                                           O
                                                           z
                                                            Q
                                                            "Q
J.S3M
                                                            O
                                                            O
                                                            O

                                                            o>
                                                           CM
                                                           LO

                                                           LJ
                                                           u_
       181

-------
                                                                O
                                                                00
                                                                tf)
                                                                Z3

                                                                3


                                                                00

                                                                I—"
                                                                CO
                                                                O
                                                                O
                                                                Tf
                                                                CD
                                                                O
                                                                O
                                                                x
                                                                O
                                                                O

                                                                J3
                                                                Ci


                                                                c
                                                                O
                                                                O
1S3M
                                                                CM
                                                                Lf)
                                                                LJ
                                                                —
                                                                '
       182
in
r=H

CO

-------
1SV3
               I  i            i
                                                            O
                                                            oo
                                                            O'l
                                                            13
                                                            a>



                                                            oo

                                                            i—"

                                                            LJ

                                                            o
                                                            o
                                                            m
                                                            o
                                                            o
                                                            X

                                                            O
1S3M
                                                            0.
                                                           -Q
                                                           OJ
 I
un
       183
                                                                       00
                                                                       00

-------
                                    g       8
                                                              00
                                                              CT>
                                                              00
                                                              UJ

                                                              O
                                                              O
                                                              in
                                                              x-
                                                              o
1S3M
                                                              LL
                                                              JD
                                                              CVJ
                                                               I
                                                              tn
        184
                                                                       00
                                                                       CO

-------
                                                             o
                                                             CO
                                                             00
                                                             LO
                                                             LJ

                                                             O
                                                             O
                                                              x
                                                             O
                                                             r>
                                                             C"
                                                             13
                                                             O


                                                             "o
1S3M
                                                             1)
                                                            JD
                                                            CM
                                                             LO
                                                             u
                                                                       CO
                                                                       CD
        185

-------
                                                                o
                                                                00
                                                                en
                                                                in
                                                                15
                                                                00

                                                                I—"
                                                                V)
                                                                O
                                                                O
                                                                (ฃ>
                                                                o
                                                                o
                                                                X

                                                                O
                                                                o
1S3W
                                                                O
                                                                'J
                                                                O
                                                                k.
                                                                0)
                                                                CL
 I
ID

LJ
cr
D
O
                                                                          00
                                                                          00
         186

-------
                                                                  o
                                                                  00
                                                                  en
                                                                  -
                                                                  z>
                                                                  Q'
                                                                  13
                                                                  <

                                                                  00
                                                                  (f)
                                                                  LJ

                                                                  O
                                                                  O
                                                                  CD
                                                                  O
                                                                  X
                                                                  o
                                                                  ri
                                                                  ^*—
                                                                  r<
1S3AA
                                                                 .a
                                                                 CM
                                                                 in

                                                                 U

        187
                                                                            00
                                                                            oo

-------
                                                               o
                                                               CO
                                                               cr>
                                                               cr>
                                                               ^

                                                               <

                                                               00


                                                               (—"
                                                               to
                                                               o
                                                               o
                                                               r-.
                                                               o
                                                               2
                                                                O
1S3M
                                                               G.
                                                               (NJ
                                                               LJ
          188
                                                                            CD

                                                                            CO

-------
    Time : 800 - 2000 EST


520   540    560    580
600
                                                                  Maximum Value = 17.41
                                                                  Minimum Value = 4.40
                                      NORTH

                                620   640    660    680   700   720    740    760
                                                                                4660
                                                                                4640
                                                    - 4620
                                                                              - 4600
                                                                                4580
                                                                              - 4560
                                                                              - 4540
                                                                              - 4520
                                                                              - 4500
                                                                              - 4480
20
10
                                          rn i  i i  i yrr M *  * i
                          10
                         20
                                      SOUTH
                                                                            30
                                                                                4460
  FIGURE 5-13.  Maximum daily ozone concentrations (pphm) for scenario 1
  on 8 August 1980.   (* denotes  location of maximum concentration value)
                                          189

-------
                                                                     Maximum Value = 17.42
       Time : 800 - 2000 EST                                            Minimum Value = 4.40
                                         NORTH
   520   540    560    580    600    620   640    660    680    700    720    740    760
  20
(fl
  10
      I I  I I I  t I  I f I  I I  I I  )  I i  I I I f I  ' I  I  I I  I i 1  I I  I I I 1 '  ' t  I  I I  I I  I  I I .-I
                                   16
                                  HEMP RABL
MORR
       SOMV   I    ./ .
              \
           NBRW-
                MMTH
       i	i_ t  }  t*  \  1   tit  1	 I  l  I   I  I  i   1  I   I  I  I  I  I  I  I   I  I   I
                             10
                                                  20
                                          SOUTH
                                                                                    4660
                                                                                    4640
                                                                                4620
                                                                                    4600
                                                                                    4580
                                                                                  - 4560
                                                                              - 4540
- 4520
                                                                                  - 4500
                                                                                  - 4480
                                                                            j	
                                                                                30
                                                                                    4460
    FIGURE 5-14.  Maximum daily ozone  concentrations (pphm)  for scenario 2
    on  8  August 1980.   (* denotes location of maximum concentration value)
                                             190

-------
                                                                   Moximum Value = 1.28
    Time : 800 - 2000 EST                                             Minimum Value =  -1.61
                                       NORTH
520   540    560    580    600    620    640    660   680    700    720    740    760
                                                                                 4660
                                                                                  4640
                                                                                 4620
                                                                               - 4600
                                                                                 4580
                                                                               - 4560
                                                                               - 4540
                                                                               - 4520
                                                                               - 4500
                                                                               - 4480
                                                                                 4460
   I I  I I  t  I I  I I I  t j  I 1 I  I I  I  I I V i  i  I i  i i  I  i r  i
                                ,.-'  ..  ..-''.--0.5
                                ' BABL "'.--''
              BAY
           MIDS
     PFLD  LIN
SOMV
                                         ATLANTIC
                                       SOUTH
 FIGURE 5-15.   Differences in maximum daily  ozone concentrations (ppb)
 between scenario 1 and  scenario 2.   (* denotes location of maximum
 ozone decrease)
                                          191

-------
    Time  800 - 2000 EST
                                      NORTH
520   540    560    580   600    620    6*0   660
               Maximum Value = 17 49
               Minirr,jm Value =  4.40
680   700    720    740   760
          i i  | i  i f  |  i i  i |  i i  i | f  i i  [ i  i  i |  i
                          I   I  I   I  I   !  I   I   !  I   I  I   !  I   I  1   I  I
                                                                            30
                                                                                4660
                                                                                4640
                                                                                4620
                                                                                4600
                                                                                4580
                                                                                4560
                                                                                4540
                                                                                4520
                                                                                4500
                                                                                4480
                                                                                4460
                                      SOUTH
  FIGURE 5-16.   Maximum daily ozone concentrations (pphm) for scenario  3
  for 8 August  1980.  (* denotes location of maximum concentration value.)
                                          192

-------
    Time : 800 - 2000 EST

520   540    560    580   600
               Maximum Value = 0.89
               Minimum Value =  -0.1 1
      NORTH
620   640   660
680   700    720    740   760
                 I I  | I I  I   I I  I | 1  I I  | I  I I  |  I I  I L '  f I   '  '  ' I  '••'•'
                 BAY
              MIDS
        PFLD  L
   SOMV   .    ./  .
                                        ATLANTIC
                                      SOUTH
                                                                                4660
                                                                                4640
                                                                              - 4620
                                                                              - 4600
                                                                                4580
                                                                              - 4560
                                                                                4540
                                                                              - 4520
                           - 4500
                                                                              - 4480
                                                                                4460
 FIGURE 5-17.   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations (ppb)
 between scenario 2 and  scenario 3.   (* denotes  location of maximum
 ozone decrease.)
                                         193

-------
    Time : 800 - 2000 EST
                                      NORTH
520   54-0    560    580   600    620   64-0    660
               Maximum Value =  17.4-4
               Minimum Value = A.40
680   700    720    740    760
                 t i i  ซ i  i Y i  > ป  I T r '• T ' ' '  1 '  ' 'iT\ I  T I  I  ' '  T •'ป[•'- f
   SOMV   .V
             MMTH

              I*  f  1  1 I I   !  I   I  I   t  I   1  t  1  1  I   I  t   I  I   t  I   !  I  1
                                                                                 4660
                                                                                 4640
                                                                               - 4620
                                                                               - 4600
                                                                                 4580
                                                                               - 4560
                                                                               - 4540
                                                                               - 4520
                                                                               - 4500
                                                                               - 4480
                                                                             30
                                                                                 44-60
                                      SOUTH
 FIGURE 5-18.   Maximum daily ozone concentrations  (pphm)  for scenario 4
 for 8 August 1980.   (* denotes  location of maximum concentration value)
                                          194

-------
                                                                 Maximum Value = 2.04
    Time : 800 - 2000 EST                                           Minimum Value = -220
                                      NORTH
520   540    560    580   600    620    640   660   680    700   720   740    760
                                                                                4660
                                                                                4640
                                                                                4620
                                                                              - 4600
                                                                                4580
                                                                              - 4560
                                                                              - 4540
                                                                              - 4520
                                                                              - 4500
                                                                              — 4480
    l  I   i  i i   l  i i |  i l  i |  i i i  i
             MWTH
           I   l* t   1  lit  i   1  t   I  i
                          10
20
30
                                                                                4460
                                      SOUTH
 FIGURE  5-19.  Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations  (ppb)
 between scenario 1  and scenario 4.   (* denotes location of maximum
 ozone decrease.)
                                         195

-------
       Time : 800 - 2000 GST
   706
V)
                                        NORTH
726
746
Maximum Value = 14-.98
Minimum Value =  7.83

   766
                                                                                - 4316
                                                                                - 4296
                                                                                - 4276
                                                                                - 4256
                                                 10
                                                                                  4236
                                         SOUTH
    FIGURE 5-20.  Maximum daily ozone concentrations (pphm) for scenario 1  on
    13  July 1976.   (*  denotes location of maximum concentration value)
                                            IQfi

-------
     Time : 800 - 2000 CST
 706
                                      NORTH
726
                                              746
                                          Maximum Value = 1 4-.50
                                          Minimum Value = 7.83

                                             766
20
10
      t    t	t	i    fit
                                                        +316
                                                                                4296
                                                        4276
                                                                                4256
                                               10
                                                                                4236
                                      SOUTH
  FIGURE  5-21.   Maximum daily ozone concentrations  (pphm)  for scenario 2 on
  13 July 1976.   (* denotes location of maximum concentration value)
                                         197

-------
    Time : 800 - 2000 CST
                                     NORTH
706
726
746
Maximum v/olue = 0.13

Minimum Value =  -4.99


   766
                                                                             -4316
                                                                             - 4296
                                                                             - 4276
                                                                             - 4256
                                              10
                                                                               4236
                                      SOUTW
  FIGURE 5-22.   Differences  in maximum daily ozone concentrations (ppb)
  between scenario 1 and scenario 2.  (* denotes location of maximum
  ozone decrease.)
                                        198

-------
           Time : 800  - 2000 GST
       706
      20

-------
    Time : 800 - 2000 CST
706
                                     NORTH
726
74-6
                                          Maximum Value = 0.49
                                          Minimum Value = -41.34
766
                                                                            - 4316
                                                                            - 4296
                                                                            - 4276
                                                                            - 4256
                                              10
                                                                               4236
                                     SOUTH
 FIGURE 5-32.   Differences in maximum daily ozone concentrations (ppb)
 between scenario 1 and SIP  scenario B.   (* denotes location of maximum
 ozone decrease.)
                                         208

-------
              TABLE 5-1.  Ozone monitoring' sites
              within the New York modeling domain.

                                     Four-Letter
                  Site Name            Identifier

              Hartford CT                HART
              Bridgeport CT              BRPT
              Danbury CT                 DANE
              Derby CT                   DRBY
              Greenwich CT               GWCH
              Litchfield CT              LTCF
              Middletown CT              MDTN
              New Haven CT               NHVN
              Stratford CT               STRF
              Bayonne NJ                 BAYO
              Dumont NJ                  DMNT
              East Orange NJ             EORG
              Linden NJ                  LIND
              Newark NJ                  NEWK
              Plainfield NJ              PLFD
              Middlesex County NJ        MIDS
              New Brunswick NJ           NBRW
              Morris County NJ           MORR
              Somerville NJ              SOMV
              Hempstead Park NY          HEMP
              Hempstead NY               HMPS
              NYC Queens College NY      NYC1
              NYC Kings NY               NYC2
              NYC 2nd Avenue NY          NYC3
              NYC Richmond NY            NYC4
              NYC Woolsey NY             NYC5
              NYC PS 321 NY              NYC6
              White Plains NY            WPLN
              Babylon NY                 BABL
              Mamaroneck NY              MAMA
              Poughkeepsie NY            POUG
              Stonybrook NY              STON
88151  9
                                     209

-------
  TABLE  5-2.   UAM model  performance  for  8  August  1980  hourly
  ozone  concentrations  (comparison of  application of the
  UAM (CB-IV)  in this study and  application  of  the UAM (CB-II)
  in  the OMNYMAP studies).
Performance Measure
Number of pairs
Average observed (pphm)
Average predicted (pphm)
Bias (pphm)
Average percent overprediction
Absolute average gross error
(pphm)
Gross error percent difference
Root mean squared error (pphm)
Correlation coefficient
Peak observed (pphm)
Peak predicted (pphm)
This Study
UAM (CB-IV)
520
6.1
9.3
-3.1
51%
3.8
62%
4.9
0.800
24.6
23.5
OMNYMAP
Study
UAM (CB-II)
408
7.0
11.7
-4.7
67%
5.0
71%
6.8
0.739
24.6
26.3
  (unmatched by time or location)

  Percent agreement of peak            4%            7%
  (unmatched by time or location)

  Peak predicted (pphm) (matched by    21.4          -23
  location but not time)

  Percent agreement of peak            13%           -7%
  (matched by location but not time
88151 9
                                     210

-------
  TABLE 5-3.   UAM model performance for 13 July 1980 hourly ozone
  concentrations (comparison of application of the UAM (CB-IV) in
  this study  and application of the UAM (CB-II) in the St. Louis
  Ozone Modeling Project).
Performance Measure
Number of pairs
Average observed (pphm)
Average predicted (pphm)
Bias (pphm)
Average percent difference
Average absolute gross error (pphm)
Gross error percent difference
Root mean squared error
Correlation coefficient
Peak observed (pphm)
Peak predicted (pphm) (unmatched
This Study
UAM (CB-IV)
265
6.8
7.5
-0.7
11*
1.7
25*
2.2
0.91
22.3
24.2
St. Louis Ozone
Modeling Project
UAM (CB-II)
184
8.3
7.4
0.9
11*
N/A
N/A
1.8
0.95
22.3
17.4
  by time or location)

  Percent agreement of peak                9*               22%
  (unmatched by time or location)

  Peak predicted (pphm) (matched by        21.9             16.8
  location but not time)

  Percent agreement of peak (matched       2%               25%
  by location but not time)
88151 9
                                    211

-------





CM

•o

ซ-
n
5
as
S
8
in

1
5
"3

td JJ
C- c.
ซ* o
6- V.













X
ง




















8



















ง





























S
0
I.
ซฃ



c
8
fe
a.








4->
ง


0,























0s*
i
o

ง
4-1
4)
00
ง
5

ง
CM
4>
eo
js
0
••4


g
frt
j*
u

g
2

00
ง
5


^
5
^


ง
i.
4)
00
C
as

u
s
i
4>
eo
1
O




rM
>
•o
•ซป
n
ง
ii

CM

"2
ID
C
4)

CO

O
i.
s
4)
O
CO

,_,
^
" 4) 4) 41 4)
p o a o
3 CO CO CO CO
a>



\0 t~ CO
in rr ^*


0 1 —






1 O —
•f


O O CM
in in in






r— i vo
•f t








1 vO CM
1




CM in CO
ON in CM
in m in




CO 1 CM
ซ- +






i m oo
*7 T







vo in vo









ซ- CM in

0 0 O
3 (8 18 (0
_J 4) 4) 4>
O O O
• CO CO CO
1^*
CO


vo
*


^






,_
+


CM
in






00
1








2
1




•~
in




,_
i






i







CO
vO
in








vo

o


*
212

-------
T3
 O
C CM CO iH
CU O C L,
O O CO
J. CD -rH C
CO 00 CO CU
cu e co o
rt ^ CO
5 tง



CD
00
C 40 JC CM
CO CO 4O
ฃ CU -ซH O
0 ฃ 3 ~H
00 L,
40 -rH CU Cfl
exec
cu o cu
O CM N CJ
L, O O CO
cu
CU



85
•H ซ*
5ป 3
40 O
C CM CO -H
goes.
O CO
L, CU TH C
CU 00 CO CU

ro *^ ^7
6b!

cu
00
C 40 ฃ —
CO CO 40
ฃ CD tH O
CJ ฃ 3 -H
00 L,
40 -rH CU CO
exec
cu o cu
CJ CM N CJ
L, 0 O CO
cu
Cu



cu c
C 0
o -*
N 40
2 'B'
40 40 ฃ
to c a.
cu cu a
ฃ O ซ—
00 C
ScS
















*
o
•H
f ,
s
cu
CJ
CO















CM o in
CO +
^











in

o o o












O =3- ซ-
CVJ CM
1 1









in
o o o











if .=r in

e- t^ c~






^^
rH
0
c
CO

40
cu

*^** J3
Q-. J->
^> •!— (
0= 3
40 CU CU
B S> >
cu ce as
^,
Li 3 3
300
CJ rH rH
**^ **~* •*—*

ป- CM CO

o o o
4— .H .rH -rH
s<* Li Li Li
Li cO co cO
o c e c
x cu cu a>
O CJ O
3 CO CO CO
0)
z




4ซ
T"1
1













o












CO
CO
1










o











^f
•
t-








0
c

ฃ
40
•rH ^"s
3 n
cu
Cu CO
:> co
cc o
•H
40
B 00
CU B

Li C
1!


^f

o
•rH
L,
cfl
e
cu
CJ
CO







































































































CO
3
O


•
CO








CO

A












o

t-













o

















o












o
in














^•^
CU
^fc
OS

40
C
cu
L,
L,
3
O

^

O
•ปH
CO
C
cu
o
CO









o
















o













tn

T













ซ—
•
CO
1











in
.=T


















^^
Cu
cc

3
O
rH

CM

o

CO
e
cu
CJ
CO









CM
+















O













CO
*—
1













^-
*
CO
1











in
=f







X"N
rH
O
s
ฃ
40
CU

•C
40
•H
3

Cu
as

3
O
rH

in

0

CO
c

CJ
CO









^—
1













CM
•
O
1












^o
ซ—
1













CO
*
CO
1











•3"
=r









b7
03
H
bl

f^
40
•H
3

CU
g

3
O
rH

vO

O
•rH
CO
C
CU
CJ
CO









CO
=r













CM
•
^O
^












vO
CM














p*-
•
CM
^











•=r
in







_cl
00
•ฃ
>^
40
••H
3

Cu
^>
CC

40
CU
L.
L.
3
CJ

C—

o
•rH
CO
c
CD
O
CO





















































































^-ป*
n
cu
to
CO
o
rH

00
•H
c
c
3
*"


















^5
O^
1












o^
•
vp
1












o

i













o
•,
o
ป—
1










in
CO






^^n
C
O
•rH
40
CJ
3
•o
CU
Li

o
o


**.
o
^^1

^B


L,
fd
c
^
CO

Qu
I-H
co









^^
o^
1












t-
•
in

i











o

i













t-
*
CO
ป•—
1










CO
CM





s~+*
^J
C 40
o "H
•rH >
4O -rH
CJ 4O
3 O
"O CO
cu cu
Li L,

O C
O O

•^J
ป*. cu
O CO
=r co
•— ' jQ

CO

•rH
L.
a)
C
cu
CO

Cu
rH
CO
































































•
,r—s
o
in
i
S

n
00
Q.


CO
o
•rH
L.
CO
V
0
CO

CM
O

c
0
TH
4J
CO

1
CO
i-H
CU
f
o
CM

40
>:
cu

cu
cu
CO
*
cu
c
cu o
00 N
c o
CO
L. CU
1 .C
00 40
c
O ^M
rH O

cu >>

40 •ฃ
6 i-l
O 40
•rH
CO CO
o B
•H CU
L, CO
CO C
C *"H
cu
O 4O
CO C
cu
B L,
.2 s
co a
CO CO
e co
CU ฃ
40
1 *
c o
CU 40
cu >>
CM rH
CM -H
•rH >
•o >
CU L,
CM CO
CM 73
CU C
3
cu o
ฃ. JQ
L, "
CU CU
•o •
•rH -rH
CO "^
c
O CO
CJ 40

40 (0
0 40
C 3
"O p"H
•^H O
•O Q.
Me. .
>*H
•rH O
CO
>> 40
rH L,
CO O
Cf* .
u.
cfl co
c
CU CO

p 40
4—
Ll
CU

40
Ll
CM

Li
0
CM

40
}Q
CU
40
cu
f
40

0
40

T3
CU
L.
L,
CU
CM
CU
t-
co
•rH
L,
CU
T3
cO
cu
L>
CU
s:
H


•
CO
e
o
•rH
40
CO
CJ
••H
rH
a
a.
CO

^
Li
O
>H
3
O
z

cu
g"i
40
L.
O
CM
>,
O
40
C
cu
^
c
iH

ง

cu •
ฃ *-*
40 CO
CO
c ซ-

CM
CO CO
cu ซ-
00
c n
CO CU
ฃ 00
O CO
a.
cu -^
L, C
Cfl O
rH -rH
40
O cfl
** i
^ iH
CO Q.
a; x
Q. CU

01

-------
                                 References
Ames, 3., T. C. Myers, L. E. Reid, D. C. Whitney, S. H. Golding, S. R. Hayes, and
     S.D.Reynolds. 1985. "SAI Airshed Model Operations Manuals, Volume I—
     User's Manual and Volume II—Systems Manual." U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (EPA-600/8-85-007a,b).

Bass, A. M., L. C. Glasgow, C. Miller, 3. P. Jesson, and D. L. Filken.  1980.  Planet
     Space Sci., 28:675.

Boris, 3. P., and D. L. Book. 1973. Flux-corrected transport:  I. SHASTA, a fluid
     transport algorithm that works.  3. Comp. Phys., 11:38-69.

Brimblecombe, P. 1986. Air Composition and Chemistry.  Cambridge University
     Press.

Burton, C. S.  1988.  Comments on "Ozone Air Quality Models." 3. Air Pollut.
     Control Assoc., 38(9): 1119-1128.

Chock, D. P., and A. M. Dunker. 1983. A comparison of numerical methods for
     solving the advection equation. Atmos. Environ., 17:11-24.

Chock, D. P.  1985.  A comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection
     equation—II. Atmos. Environ., 19:571-586.

Cole, H. S., D. E. Layland, G. K. Moss, and C. F. Newberry. 1983. "The St. Louis
     Ozone Modeling Project."  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
     Triangle Park, NC (EPA-450/4-83-019).

Dennis * R. L., M. W. Downton, and R. S. Keil.  1983. "Evaluation of Performance
     Measures for an Urban Photochemical Model." U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency (EPA-450/4-83-021).

Douglas, S., and R. Kessier. 1988. "User's Guide to the Diagnostic Wind Model.  Ver-
     sion 1.0."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California.

EPA.  1980. "Northeast Corridor Regional Modeling Project Continuous Nonmethane
     Organic Compound Data Collection." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Research Triangle Park,  North Carolina (EPA-450/4-80-034).
881Slrl 12

                                     214

-------
EPA.  1985a.  "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. Volume I: Stationary
     Point and Area Sources." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research
     Triangle Park, North Carolina (AP-42).

EPA.  1985b.  "National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1985." U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
     (EPA-450/4-87-001).

EPA.  1986.  "Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)." U.S. Environmental Pro-
     tection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (EPA-450/2-78-027R).

EPA.  1987a.  "Control of Gasoline Volatility and Evaporative Hydrocarbon Emissions
     from New Motor Vehicles." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

EPA.  1987b.  "Guideline for Use of City-Specific EKMA in Preparing Post-1987
     Ozone SIP's." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

EPA.  1988.  Office of Mobile Sources, personal communication.

EPA.  1988.  "Air Emissions Species Manual. Volume I: Volatile Organic Compound
     Species Profiles." U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,  Research Triangle
     Park, North Carolina (EPA-450/2-88-003a).

Federal Register.  1987. "State Implementation Plans; Approval of Post-1987 Ozone
     and Carbon Monoxide Plan Revisions for Areas Not Attaining the National
     Ambient Air Quality Standards; Notice." Federal Register, Vol. 52, No. 226
     (November 24, 1987).

Fehsenfeld, F. C., D.  D. Parrisch, and D. W. Fancy. 1988. "The Measurement of
     NOX in the Non-Urban Troposphere," in Tropospheric Ozone, I. Isaksen, ed.
     (D. Reidel Publishing Company).

Fox, D. 1981. Judging air quality model performance. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
     62(5):599-609.

Fox, D. G.  1984.  Uncertainty in air quality modeling.  Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
     65:27-36.

Gery, M. W., G. Z. Whitten, and J. P. Killus.  1988.  "Development and Testing of the
     CBM-IV for Urban and Regional Modeling."  Systems Applications, Inc., San
     Rafael, California (SYSAPP-88/002).
88I51rl 12


                                     215

-------
Godden, D., and F. Lurmann. 1983. "Development of the PLMSTAR Model and Its
     Application to Ozone Episode Conditions in the South Coast Air Basin."
     Environmental Research 
-------
O'Brien, J. 3. 1970. A note on the vertical structure of the eddy exchange coef-
     ficient in the planetary boundary layer.  3. Atmos. Sci., 27:1213-1215.

OTA. 1988a. "Urban Ozone and the Clean Air Act:  Problems and Proposals for
     Change." Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.

OTA. 1988b. "Ozone and the Clean Air Act:  Summary of OTA Workshop with State
     and Local Air Pollution Control Agency Officials." Office of Technology
     Assessment, Washington, D.C.

OTA. 1988c. "Ozone and the Clean Air Act:  A Summary of  OTA  Workshops on
     Congressional Options to Address Nonattainment of the Ozone Standard."
     Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.

Pechan, E. H., and Associates. 1988.  "National Assessment of VOC, CO, and NOX
     Emissions and Costs for Attainment of the Ozone and CO Standards" (in
     preparation).

Pedco.  1980. "Northeast Corridor Regional Modeling Project (NECRMP)." U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-450/4-80-034).

Peters, L. K., and W. L. Chameides. 1980. "Methane and Carbon Monoxide in the
     Troposphere," in Advances in  Environmental Science and Engineering, Volume
     3, Pfaffin and Ziegler, eds. (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers), pp.
     100-149.

Price, H. S., R. S. Varga, and 3. E. Warren. 1966. Applications of oscillation
     matrices to diffusion and convection equations. 3. Math. Phys., 45:301-311.

Rao, S. T.  1987.  "Application of the Urban Airshed Model to the New York Metro-
     politan Area." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
     North Carolina (EPA-450/4-87-011).

Rao, S. T.,  and G. Sistla. 1987.  "Sensitivity Analysis of the Urban Airshed Model."
     Air Pollution Control  Association  Conference on the Scientific <5c Technical
     Issues Facing the Post-1987 Ozone Control Strategies.  Hartford, Connecticut
     (16-19 November).

Ross, D. G., and  I. Smith. 1986. "Diagnostic Wind Field Modeling for Complex Ter-
     rain—Testing and Evaluation." Centre for Applied Mathematical Modeling,
     Chisholm Institute of  Technology (CAMM Report No. 5/86).

Schere, K.  L.  1983. An evaluation of several numerical advection schemes.  Atmos.
     Environ., 17:1897-1907.
 8815lrl  12


                                     217

-------
Schere, K. L., and K. L. Demerjian. 1977. "Calculation of Selected Photolytic Rate
     Constants over a Diurnal Range.  A Computer Algorithm."  U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (EPA-600/4-77-
     015).

Schere, K. L., and 3. H. Shreffler.  1982.  "Final Evaluation of Urban-Scale Photo-
     chemical Air Quality Simulation Models." Environmental Sciences Research
     Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
     North Carolina (EPA-600/3-82-094).

Science.  1988.  Rural and urban ozone. Editorial in Science, 2* 1(4873): 1569.

Seinfeld, 3. H.  1988a. Ozone air quality models.  A critical review. 3. Air Pollut.
     Control Assoc., 38(5):616.

Seinfeld, 3. H.  1988b. Closing remarks.  3. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 38(8): 1136-
     1137.

Shareef, G. S., W. A. Butler, L. A.  Bravo, and M. B. Stockton. 1988. "Air Emissions
     Species Manual.  Volume I. Volatile Organic Compound Species Profiles."  U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
     (EPA-450/2-88-003a).

Smolarkiewicz, P. K. 1983. A simple positive definite advection scheme with small
     implicit diffusion.  Monthly Weather Review, 111:479-486.

Whitten, G. Z.  1988. "Evaluation  of the Impact of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends on Urban
     Ozone Formation." Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California
     (SYSAPP-88/029).

Whitten, G. Z.,  3. P. Killus, and H. Hogo.  1980.  "Modeling of Simulated Photo-
     chemical Smog with Kinetic  Mechanisms. Volume 1. Final Report."  Systems
     Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California (EPA-600/3-80-028a).

Whitten, G. Z.,  T. C. Meyers, C. Daly,  L. R. Chinkin, S. D. Reynolds, N. M. Yonkow,
     and B. Austin. 1985.  "Application of the Urban Airshed Model to Kern
     County."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California (SYSAPP-85/200).

Zalesak, S. T.  1979. Fully multi-dimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for
     fluids. 3. Comput. Phys., 31:335-362.

Zimmerman, D., W.  Tax, M. Smith, 3. Demmy, and R. Battye.  1988.  "Anthropogenic
     Emissions Data for the 1985  NAPAP Inventory."  U.S. Environmental Protec-
     tion Agency, Washington, D.C. (EPA-600/7-88-022).
88151r2 12


                                      218

-------
                         Appendix A

          PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR URBAN AIRSHED AND
               EKMA MODELING IN THE NEW YORK
                    METROPOLITAN AREA
88139 1

-------
                              Final Report

            PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR URBAN AIRSHED AND
                   EKMA MODELING IN THE NEW YORK
                         METROPOLITAN AREA

                             SYSAPP-88/149

                             September 1988
                              Prepared for

                           Mr. 3ohn Chamberlin

                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                  Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation
                          Washington, DC 20460

                                  and

                           Mr. Richard Scheffe

                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                     Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                               Prepared by

                         Systems Applications, Inc.
                          101 Lucas Valley Road
                          San Rafael, CA 94903
                              (415M72-4011
[)95 10 88 1 36rl

-------
                             1   INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND

Four offices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are involved in a joint
EPA-sponsored research study to investigate urban ozone air quality in a number of
U.S. cities. The offices involved are the following: Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Office of
Mobile Sources (QMS), and the Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (OPPE).
The urban areas to be studied include New York, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Dallas, and
Atlanta.  A photochemical modeling analysis will be conducted in each of these urban
areas.  This protocol addresses the New York application in particular.

Over 60 urban areas in the United States have failed to meet the legislated deadline
(31 December 1987) for ozone attainment.  Possible reasons for this include one or
more of the following:  the failure to actually reduce emissions or enforce emission
control requirements, the underestimation of actual urban hydrocarbon emissions,
and/or reliance on overly simplistic modeling approaches for calculating emission
control requirements.  In the past, many air quality planners have relied on the
EKMA procedure (Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach) to provide control
requirements for ozone attainment purposes.   The EKMA procedure uses a trajectory
model (OZIPM) to simulate ozone formation of an observed design value concentra-
tion at a downwind monitor.  An ozone isopleth diagram is created (from multiple
simulations) that depicts ozone concentrations as a function of initial NOX and VOC
concentration. The diagram can be used to equate emission control requirements to
the required percentage change between the observed ozone design value  isopleth
and the isopleth of the National Ambient Air  Quality Standard (NAAQS) (0.12 ppm).

An approach to estimating the effectiveness of alternative ozone attainment strate-
gies uses grid models such  as the Urban Airshed Model (UAM).  The UAM numerically
simulates the effects of emissions, interurban transport of ozone and precursors,
advection, diffusion, chemistry, and surface removal processes on pollutant concen-
trations in a three-dimensional grid covering an urban area. The UAM has been
applied in a number of urban areas across the United States, Europe, and the Far
East but  there has been a reluctance by some air quality planners to use the model in
other urban areas mainly because of the time and costs involved in  collecting input
data and undertaking extensive performance evaluations. However, depending on the
complexity of the ozone problem of the urban area and the particular needs of the
38136rl  2
                                        A-l

-------
air quality planners, extensive data bases and model evaluations may not be neces-
sary for an application of UAM. Indeed, no other air quality model currently in use is
subject to this level of performance evaluation. Moreover, even a "simplified" or
less stringent application of UAM appears desirable because it incorporates a reason-
ably complete mathematical treatment of the physical and chemical processes
believed to govern ozone formation.  Furthermore, because  this treatment appears to
be capable of reliably reproducing peak ozone concentrations and ozone concentra-
tions under episode conditions, the UAM provides more useful air quality planning
information than does EKMA  (Seinfeld, 1988; Burton, 1988). As one aspect of this
study, the application of UAM will follow the simplified approach for the five urban
areas to demonstrate and test the utility of such an approach for air quality planning
purposes and future applications in other urban areas.

In recent years, air quality regulators have found it increasingly difficult to identify
additional urban hydrocarbon  emissions that can be controlled in an effort to reduce
ozone concentrations. Yet at the same time there has been interest in using renew-
able fuels such as ethanol, which increase the evaporative emissions from light duty
vehicles while reducing  exhaust CO emissions. Automobiles can be operated without
modification using 10 percent ethanol blended into gasoline. Substantial utilization
of ethanol can reduce the need for imported oil, the trade deficit, and farm sub-
sidies, but concern over increased evaporative emissions has hindered its widespread
use, especially in  nonattainment areas.  A recent EKMA modeling study of ethanol-
blended gasoline in seven urban areas showed a near balance in ozone increases due
to increased evaporative volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and ozone
decreases from reduced exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO).  When the
chemistry of the evaporative emissions was explicitly  treated in the model, the   .
results always showed a net reduction in ozone associated with the use of ethanol
blends (Whitten, 1988).  The results  of this study have  been questioned by the EPA
(Emison, 1988).

Because there is considerable interest nationwide in the potential benefits from the
expanded use of ethanol as an automotive fuel, more studies are needed  to support or
refute the  findings of the initial EKMA study. Such studies will provide  guidance for
other urban areas. The  current effort will use the Urban Airshed Model  and EKMA
to examine the effects of using ethanol  fuels in the five urban areas. A  comparison
of results will be  performed to test the reliability of EKMA for such evaluations.  In
addition to the ethanol emission sensitivity work, the effects of VOC reactivity in
control strategy evaluation will be examined, and future year control strategy simu-
lations will be performed for  the five urban  areas.

The version of the UAM used in this project (UAM CBM-IV) contains several
improvements: (1) a new chemical mechanism of ozone  formation that is further
extended here to treat ethanol and methanol explicitly; (2) a new numerical integra-
tion scheme for horizontal advection and transport; and (3)  revised estimates of dry
deposition.
                                         A-2
 88136rl 2

-------
STUDY OBJECTIVES

The five key objectives to be accomplished in the overall 5-city study are as follows:

     1.    Demonstrate the simplified, limited-data application of UAM for air
          quality planning;

     2.    Determine the effects of Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and ethanol-blended
          gasoline on urban ozone concentrations in a number of urban areas, and
          compare UAM results with those obtained with EKMA;

     3.    Investigate and clarify the effects of VOC reactivity potential in emis-
          sion control strategy evaluation;

     4.    Perform SIP control strategy simulations with UAM  and EKMA for air
          quality planning and comparison of the two modeling approaches (this will
          be performed by the New York Department of Environmental Conserva-
          tion (NYDEC) after acquisition of the modeling data base).

     5.    Transfer the UAM modeling data bases and application technology to the
          5 states and EPA.


PURPOSE OF THE STUDY  PROTOCOL

This protocol is intended to serve as the basis for the performance and successful
completion of a photochemical modeling analysis of the New York metropolitan area
(separate protocols will be prepared for each of the 5 urban areas in the overall
study). The purpose of this protocol is to describe the methodologies to be followed
throughout the study.  It should be viewed as a set of general guidelines that provide
focus, consistency, and a basis for consensus for all parties involved in the study. It
will be reviewed and approved by all participants at the beginning of the study.

At this time, some portions of the modeling analysis have not been finalized in this
document (e.g., the specific emission  sensitivity scenarios). For those items that
have not been finalized, we provide lists of options that may be followed. For some
items, it will be up to the study participants to choose from the list of options as the
study evolves.


OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY

The ozone air quality study in the New York metropolitan area comprises the follow-
ing tasks:
 88136rl  2

-------
     1.    Prepare a protocol document (this document) that describes the back-
          ground, purpose, and objectives of the study, and the procedures to be
          followed in the remainder of the study.  A draft protocol will be prepared
          and sent to all participants for consensus and approval before the bulk of
          the technical work is initiated.

     2.    Prepare future base year and ethanol-use sensitivity inventories for the
          application of UAM for New York that will use the latest version of the
          model containing the Carbon-Bond IV chemical mechanism.  (Because of
          time constraints, an existing episode created by the state of New York in
          the OMNYMAP [Oxidant Modeling in the New York Metropolitan Area
          Project] study will be used.)  The future year inventories will be prepared
          for 1995 and will be projected from the existing 1985 NAPAP inventory.

     3.    Perform an EKMA analysis for the New York area, following the 1987
          EPA modeling guidelines, using the future year base case and ethanol-use
          sensitivity inventories.

     4.    Perform an application of UAM for the future year base case and etha-
          nol-use scenarios. Examine the results and compare with those obtained
          in the EKMA analysis.

     5.    Prepare an interim report that will summarize the ethanol sensitivity
          studies for EKMA and UAM, and provide an overview of the current
          understanding of the  factors that influence the effectiveness of precursor
          control, such as VOC reactivity, NOX emissions character, timing,  and
          spatial emission source distribution.

     6.    Deliver and install a compiled copy of the CBM-IV version of UAM, and
          all modeling input files used in the UAM application on the State of New
          York's computer system.  Provide copies of these input files to the
          OAQPS Source Receptor Analysis Branch.
                                         A-4
88136rl 2                                "

-------
                     2  UAM MODELING METHODOLOGY
This section of the protocol provides details of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM)
application in the New York area including input preparation procedures, base case
simulations, and preparation of future year emission scenario inventories. The
results of these simulations will be compared to the results of the EKMA modeling
described in Section 3 of this protocol.
UAM INPUT PREPARATION PROCEDURES

Time constraints do not permit identification of ozone episodes or development of
additional modeling data bases for this project. Instead, an ozone episode simulated
in the original OMNYMAP study by NYDEC (Rao, 1987) will be used in this study.
This episode (8 August 1980) was simulated from 0400 to 2000 LST. Because it is
important in any photochemical modeling application that initial conditions do not
greatly influence the peak calculated concentration, the simulations performed as
part of this project should begin on 7 August. A two-day simulation for the New
York modeling region will also allow investigation into the effects of slower reacting
hydrocarbon species, such as those produced by ethanol blended fuels, on  peak ozone
concentrations. Inputs will be created for the hours preceding 0400 LST on 8 August
and 7 August.

The latest version of the UAM containing the Carbon-Bond IV (CBM-IV) chemical
mechanism (Gery et al., 1988) will be applied in this study. To ensure that the
modeling data base for 8 August received from NYDEC has been properly transferred
and converted to our in-house computer system, the base case simulation performed
by NYDEC will be re-run  using the Carbon-Bond II version of UAM. All subsequent
modeling will involve the  CBM-IV version of UAM.
UAM Modeling Grid Specification

The modeling will be performed on the original OMNYMAP (Rao, 1987) modeling
grid, which consists of 31 by 25 grid cells with a horizontal dimension of 8 km, cover-
ing an area 248 by 200 km.  The location of this grid and its relation to other north-
eastern states is presented in Figure 2-1. It covers parts of New Jersey, New York,
and Connecticut. The grid is located in UTM  zone 18 with the origin set at
520,000 m Easting and 4,460,000 m Northing.
88136r 1  2
                                        A-5

-------
                                                  New York
                                                    UAM
                                             modeling region
FIGURE 2-1.  Geographical location of the New York metropolitan area
UAM modeling region (intrastate boundaries denote AQCR's).
                           A-6

-------
The original vertical structure of the OMNYMAP study contained 4 vertical cells
that were constrained to 3 below and 1 above the hourly mixing height. Vertical
layers above the mixing height that are allowed to become very thick during certain
simulation hours may result in inadequate vertical resolution. Under certain condi-
tions, especially during nighttime hours when mixing heights are low, pollutants from
large point sources that are emitted aloft may be artificially dispersed in such thick
layers. Also, with thick layers, the wind speed and direction, and vertical and hori-
zontal shear above the mixing height may not be appropriately resolved. To appro-
priately resolve the vertical structure, modeling with as many as 8 vertical layers
might be desirable but might also be computationally impractical. To  provide a
balance between practicality  and appropriate vertical resolution, we recommend a
new vertical grid structure consisting of 5 vertical cells, with 2 below  and 3 above
the hourly mixing height. The heights of the vertical layers will vary in thickness
spatially and temporally depending on the hourly mixing height field. The minimum
height of the lower cells is to be 50 m, and the maximum height of the upper cells,
150m.

The following 13 input files are required for UAM modeling analyses:
DIFFBREAK
REGIONTOP
.WIND
METSCALARS
AIRQUALITY


BOUNDARY
This file contains the daytime mixing height or nighttime inversion
height for each column of cells at the beginning and end of each
hour of the simulation.

This file contains the height of each column of cells at the begin-
ning and end of each hour of the simulation. If this height is
greater than the mixing height, the cell or cells above the mixing
height are assumed to be within an inversion.

This file contains the x and y components of the wind velocity for
every grid cell for each hour of the simulation.  Also the maximum
wind speed for the entire grid and average wind speeds at each
boundary for each hour are included in this file.

This file contains the hourly values of the meteorological
parameters that do not vary spatially.  These scalars are the NC^
photolysis rate constant, the concentration of water vapor, the
temperature gradient above and below the inversion base, the
atmospheric pressure, and the exposure class.

This file contains the initial concentrations of each species for
each grid cell at the start of the simulation.

This file contains the location of the modeling region boundaries.
This file also contains the concentration of each species that is
used as the boundary condition along each  boundary segment at
each vertical level.
88136rl  2
                                          A-7

-------
TOPCONC       This file contains the concentration of each species for the area
                 above the modeling region. These concentrations are the boundary
                 conditions for vertical integration.

TEMPERATURE  This file contains the hourly temperature for each surface layer
                 grid cell.
EMISSIONS
PTSOURCE
TERRAIN
CHEMPARAM
SIMCONTROL
This file contains the ground-level emissions of NO, NO2, seven
carbon bond categories, and CO for each grid square for each hour
of the simulation.

This file contains the point source information, including the stack
height, temperature and flow rate, the plume rise, the grid cell
into which the emissions are emitted, and the emissions rates for
NO, NO2ป seven carbon bond categories, and CO for each point
source for each hour.

This file contains the value of the surface roughness and deposition
factor for each grid square.

This file contains information regarding the chemical species to be
simulated including reaction rate constants, upper and lower
bounds, activation  energy, and reference temperature.

This file contains the simulation control information such as the
time of the simulation, file option information, default informa-
tion, and information on integration and chemistry time steps.
The majority of the input files used in the previous OMNYMAP application of UAM
for 8 August will be used "as is" in this application.  However, certain of the files
(e.g., WINDS) will be recreated using new techniques, and one new file (TERRAIN)
will be added. In the original OMNYMAP application, spatially constant default
deposition and surface roughness parameters were used in place of spatially varying
parameters. The new TERRAIN file will contain updated spatially varying
parameters based on land use data. Because of the recommended changes in the ver-
tical layer structure for the new UAM modeling, those files affected by this change
will also be recreated.

The recommended procedures for preparing each of the above input  files for the New
York application are summarized in the following subsections.

DIFFBREAK - The upper air sounding data collected at the John F. Kennedy airport
     will be examined to provide estimates of daytime hourly mixing heights for
     those hours preceding 0400 LST. The methodology followed in arriving at
     spatially constant, temporally varying mixing heights for 7 August and the
 88136rl 2
                                       A- 8

-------
     nighttime hours of 8 August will be the same as that used in the original
     OMNYMAP work (i.e., following procedures developed by Benkley and Schul-
     man, 1979; Garret, 1987).

REGIONTOP - The original OMNYMAP application used a temporally varying height
     for the top of the region ranging from 1000 m to 1500 m. During the nighttime
     hours, with a 1000 m region top, emissions from large point sources may have
     plume rises above this level and will not be emitted into the modeling region.
     Lowering the region top during the evening hours of 7 August causes artificial
     dispersion of pollutants out of the top level of the modeling region that are lost
     from the modeling domain. To avoid these potential problems, we recommend
     setting the top of the region at a fixed level of 1500 m for all hours of the
     simulation.

WIND - The wind fields created  for the original OMNYMAP application were tem-
     porally varying, spatially constant, based on observed surface and upper air
     data. In the new application, we are recommending using a wind model along
     with the measured data to derive new wind fields that are both temporally and
     spatially varying. Hourly wind speed and direction data will be used along with
     the Hybrid Diagnostic Wind Model (HDWM) (Douglas and Kessier,  1988; Morris
     et al., 1987) to create new three-dimensional modeling wind fields.

METSCALARS - Meteorological data collected  in the modeling region will be used to
     complete this file for those hours preceding 0400 LST on 8 August. The
     spatially constant, temporally varying parameters include estimates for Nฉ2
     photolysis rate, water concentration, exposure class, atmospheric pressure, and
     temperature gradients above and below the mixing height.

AIRQUALITY - The species initial concentration field, the AIRQUALITY file, will be
     created by using air quality data collected at monitors in the  modeling
     domain.  The values will correspond  to the specific initial hour of the simula-
     tion, which is not known at this time.  The upper-layer initial field will  use
     values specified in the TOPCONC file. The AIRQUALITY file will be updated
     with the new CBM-IV species.

BOUNDARY - Hourly boundary conditions will be specified based on observed air
     quality data at monitors both near and outside the  inflow boundaries. The flow
     regime of 7-8 August is dominated by southwest transport; therefore, the criti-
     cal inflow boundaries will be the southern and western boundaries. Boundary
     conditions above the mixing height will use the values specified in the TOP-
     CONC file.  The new CBM-IV species will be added to the BOUNDARY file for
     the CBM-IV simulations.

TOPCONC - The original concentrations specified at the top of the modeling region
     were based on air quality data derived from aircraft spirals. This data  will be
     examined to determine whether the  values specified for 0400 LST can be used
 38136rl  2
                                        A- 9

-------
     for the preceding hours for 8 August and 7 August.  CBM-IV species will be
     added to this file before the UAM CBM-IV is exercised.

TEMPERATURE - The TEMPERATURE file contains gridded hourly surface tem-
     perature information for the modeling region.  This file is used in the UAM for
     those chemical reactions that are temperature-dependent. Gridded tempera-
     ture fields for  hours preceding 0400 LST on 8 August will be derived from
     observed data collected at National Weather Service and other local air quality
     monitoring network sites.  The Poisson interpolation method is used in the UAM
     system for processing temperature observations. The Poisson  method is a dis-
     tance-weighted interpolation scheme that is most accurate when a reasonable
     estimate is made of the initial field. A set of "pseudo" stations may have  to be
     used at the edges of the domain or where there are data gaps (e.g., over the
     ocean) in the modeling region to ensure a good initial estimate.

EMISSIONS - The original inventory used in the OMNYMAP exercise containing
     information on the CBM-II species will be  updated to correspond to a CBM-IV
     inventory. This will be accomplished by splitting total aromatics (ARO) into
     the new CBM-IV species toluene (TOL) and xylene (XYL),  and splitting total
     carbonyls  (CARB) into the new CBM-IV species formaldehyde (FORM) and
     other aldehydes (ALD2). The splitting  factors  for the new CBM-IV species will
     be taken from  the recently published EKMA guidelines for CBM-IV (Hogo and
     Gery, 1988). This 1980 base year CBM-IV  inventory is needed  for a new 1980
     CBM-IV base case simulation to ensure that the changes made to all of the
     other input files have been correctly implemented. The methodology  for creat-
     ing the future  year emission scenario inventories is presented  in the next sec-
     tion.

PTSOURCE - The CBM-II input file containing point source information will be  up-
     dated for  the 1980 CBM-IV base case simulation following the procedure per-
     formed  for the low level emissions. Methodology for deriving  the future year
     base case  and emission scenario point source files is presented in the next sec-
     tion.

TERRAIN - This file will be added to the OMNYMAP modeling  data base. It will
     contain surface roughness and deposition information as a function of land use
     (no terrain height information).  The land use data for the OMNYMAP modeling
     region will be  derived from data obtained  from the U.S. Geological Survey.
     The deposition values as a function of land use are derived from studies per-
     formed by the Argonne National Laboratory (Sheih et al.,  1986). These values
     are summarized in Table 2-1.

CHEMPARAM - The CHEMPARAM file contains information regarding (1) the
     species to be modeled by  the UAM; (2) upper and lower bounds on numerical
     and  steady-state calculations along with species "resistance" to dry deposition;
     and  (3) the rate constants for the photochemical reactions.  Before the CBM-IV
 88136rl  2
                                       A- 10

-------
              TABLE 2-1.  Surface roughness and deposition factors
              based on studies by Argonne National Laboratories.

                   Land Use         Surface Roughness   Deposition
                   Category             (meters)          Factor

              Urban                     3.00               0.2
              Agricultural      .        0.25               0.5
              Range                     0.05               0.4
              Deciduous Forest          1.00               0.4
              Coniferous Forest         1.00               0.3
                including wetland
              Mixed Forest              1.00               0.3
              Water                     0.0001             0.03
              Barren land               0.002              0.2
              Nonforest Wetlands        0.15               0.3
              Mixed Agricultural        0.10               0.5
                and range
              Rocky (low shrubs)        0.10               0.3
88136 3
                                     A-11

-------
     1980 base case simulation is performed, the CHEMPARAM file will be updated
     to correspond to the new species simulated with the new mechanism.

S1MCONTROL - The SIMCONTROL file controls the actual simulation parameters of
     the UAM run (i.e., simulation time period, minimum time steps, output time
     intervals). At this time it is not known when the simulation will be initiated;
     however, all other information contained in the file will not change from one
     simulation to another.
Assessment of Model Performance for the Base Case

After the modeling inputs have been finalized and rendered consistent with UAM
CBM-IV requirements for the 1980 base case simulation, a new base case simulation
will be run. As noted, it is not certain at this time when the simulation will be
initiated; however, the simulation will be run to 2000 LSI on 8 August. Before using
the updated modeling data base  in any future year emission scenario simulations, it is
essential that at least a limited  assessment of model performance be undertaken,
even in this low-cost, simplified UAM application. The model's ability to predict the
level and spatial orientation of the observed  ozone field will be assessed by compar-
ing the UAM-calculated concentrations with the measured data.

We will compute a limited set of model performance statistics that summarize error,
bias, and the model's ability to calculate the peak ozone concentration.  In this appli-
cation, no specific performance criteria will be established, and no strict perform-
ance evaluation will be undertaken.  However, if the modeling system shows very
poor performance, we may undertake one (or more as time allows) diagnostic simula-
tion^) to identify a range of alternatives for improving model performance. For
example, a diagnostic simulation may involve changes to the three-dimensional wind
field (within the range of the uncertainty of  the data used to prepare the field) if
spatial alignment problems occur in the base case simulation.  Future year emission
scenario simulations  using the CBM-IV modeling data base will be performed only
after there is agreement  from participating technical representatives that perform-
ance in the base case is adequate.
Future Year Emission Inventory Development

Improved Urban Airshed Model performance is achieved when emissions data in a
very specific and detailed format is available.  UAM requires a spatially
disaggregated and temporally allocated emissions inventory.  Performance is
improved if a chemically speciated emissions inventory is obtained, although
speciation could be achieved by using default speciation profiles, as is customarily
done with EKMA.  Meeting these requirements often entails the collection of
additional emissions-related information such as population distribution and
industrial activity data.
 88136rl 2                             A-12

-------
In this study we will be using the 1985 NAPAP (National Acid Precipitation Assess-
ment Program) Emissions Inventory as the base year from which all future year emis-
sion scenarios will be developed. The future year selected for use in this study is
1995.  The 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory consists of annual county-wide area
source emissions (including mobile sources), and annual emissions for large point
sources along with stack parameters (i.e., stack height, diameter, flow rate, and
temperature).  The county-wide area source emissions will be disaggregated onto the
gridded modeling domain using the gridded population distribution.  Source categories
will be classified as related to the population distribution, inversely related to the
population distribution, or not related at all to population, and gridded accordingly.
The annual emission rates  will be adjusted for each source category to summer
weekday emissions by using scaling factors based upon typical values of monthly
throughputs  and weekday factors. Likewise, hourly variations in emissions will be
based upon typical diurnal activity levels for each source category.

The stationary source emissions for the 1995 scenario year will be projected from
1985 NAPAP emissions by utilizing growth factors by source category available from
an EPA-sponsored study (Pechan, 1988).  Mobile source emissions will be prepared
using scaling factors provided by the EPA Office  of Mobile Sources specifically for
each scenario to be  analyzed.

Several emissions inventories will be used for the limited performance evaluation of
the UAM and assessment of the effects of alternative fuel use and SIP control
strategies. The following  list describes each of the emission scenarios:

     CBM-II 1980 case - the  inventory used for the past UAM/CBM-II applications.

     CBM-IV 1980 case -  a modified version of the CBM-II met case for CBM-IV
     species.  This inventory will be used to verify that the UAM/CBM-IV is opera-
     ting properly and predicts ozone patterns comparable to those predicted by the
     UAM/CBM-II. This inventory is valid  for 1980. The creation of this inventory
     was described in the input preparation section above.

     1985 NAPAP - gridding of 1985 NAPAP inventory for CBM-IV species, as is, to
     the modeling domain.

     1995 base case - this inventory is based on the 1985  NAPAP county inventory.
     Stationary source emissions are projected to 1995 using growth factors from
     Pechan (1988). Mobile source emissions will be based on values provided by
     OMS reflecting fleet turnover and present fuel properties. The emission
     scenarios will  correspond to different assumptions in the mobile source emis-
     sions.

     1995 Emission Scenarios - these inventories will reflect changes in VOC, NOX,
     and CO due to assumptions of future changes in mobile source emission rates
 88136rl  2
                                          A-13

-------
     such as changes in Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and use of ethanol-blended
     fuels. For New York, EPA/OPPE has defined 6 separate emission scenarios as
     follows:

          Scenario //I - 1995 base case with mobile emissions at current RVP values
          (11.5 psi) with running losses

          Scenario #2 - 1995 base case with mobile emissions at low RVP values
          (9.0 psi) with running losses

          Scenario #3 - 1995 base case with 100 percent ethanol penetration* and
          10 percent ethanol blend at low RVP (10.0 psi) plus 1 psi exemption with
          running losses

          Scenario #4 - 1995 base case with mobile emissions at current RVP values
          (11.5 psi) without running losses

          Scenario //5 - 1995 base case with 50 percent ethanol penetration at low
          RVP (9.0 psi) plus 1 psi exemption with running losses

          Scenario #6 - 1995 base case with current RVP and running losses using
          alternative speciation methodology
Emission Scenario Simulations

On the basis of emission scenario options outlined in the previous section, a subset
will be chosen for UAM modeling. In addition to changes in the input emissions files,
the initial condition (AIRQUALITY) and boundary condition (BOUNDARY) files will
be changed to reflect general estimates of future year air quality. Estimates for
initial conditions will be changed (increased/decreased) to reflect changes in the
emission inventory for the New York metropolitan area from 1980 to 1995 based on
projected growth and anticipated future emission controls.  To calculate a future
year estimate, the urban background estimate will first be subtracted from the
actual  meteorological base year concentration for 1980.  The resulting concentration
will be changed in proportion to changes in emissions.  The background will then be
added to this concentration to arrive at a future year estimate.  Similarly, on the
basis of emission changes in  upwind areas (for this episode, New Jersey), the  upwind
inflow  boundary conditions will be changed to reflect forecasted changes in emissions
* In this context, "penetration" is defined as the change from one type of fuel to
 another. A 50 percent ethanol penetration scenario is one in which 50 percent of
 fuel used in vehicles is converted from gasoline to an ethanol-blended fuel.


88136rl  2                               _

-------
between  1980 and 1995. Only one set of future year initial and boundary conditions
will be selected and used for all modeling pertaining to a given future year. We will
not use multiple sets that reflect specific differences in emissions between
scenarios.

The results of the UAM simulations will be presented in the form of ozone difference
plots.  These plots are created by subtracting the calculated ozone concentration of
the future year base case (for each grid cell, for each hour) from the concentration
obtained in the emission sensitivity  simulations. This results  in hourly isopleth maps
that show both the magnitude and spatial extent of differences in ozone concentra-
tions due to changes in emissions. Changes in calculated peak ozone will also be
summarized in tabular  format.
                                        A-15

-------
                    3   EKMA MODELING METHODOLOGY
BACKGROUND

A recent study used the simple photochemical modeling approach known as EKMA
(Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach) to investigate the possible impacts on urban
ozone formation from the use of ethanol-blended gasoline fuels (Whitten, 1988).  The
study addressed the comparative reactivities of the relevant ozone precursor emis-
sions affected by the use of ethanol blends.  Atmospheric conditions were varied to
represent those found in seven cities. The key finding of the study was a near
balance between ozone increases from enhanced evaporative emissions of VOC and
ozone decreases from reduced exhaust emissions of CO.  This was the first  study to
consider mitigation of ozone VOC precursors through CO reductions. When  the
chemistry of the individual evaporative emissions  species was explicitly treated in
the model, the results always showed a net reduction in ozone associated with the
use of ethanol blends. However, the U.S. EPA recommends simplified treatment of
reactivity in the EKMA, whereby the reactivity of all VOC emissions species is
treated as being equal to the reactivity of overall average VOC.  While this simpli-
fied treatment overestimates the reactivity of the increased evaporative emissions,
the EKMA modeling results indicated small net reductions in ozone formation from
the use of ethanol blends in some cases, and in others the simplified reactivity
assumption showed a small net increase in ozone.  Although the existing EKMA
model can explicitly treat the chemistry of evaporative automotive emissions, the
simplified treatment of reactivity is more consistent with the overall simplified
philosophy embodied in regulatory applications of  EKMA.

The negative  or positive direction of the small ozone impacts derived from the
simplified treatment of VOC reactivity and the size of the ozone reductions derived
from the explicit chemical treatment of the affected emissions appear to depend on
the mobile-related fraction of total VOC and the ratio of CO emissions to VOC emis-
sions.  Areas with low mobile-related VOC fractions and high CO-to-VOC ratios are
expected to show the largest net ozone reductions if ethanol fuels are used because,
under these conditions, the overall ambient increases in VOC will be smaller, and the
decreases in ambient CO concentrations will be larger. However, it is important to
increase the confidence in the preliminary EKMA  analyses thus far carried  out. Fur-
ther UAM and EKMA evaluations are thus warranted, and will be carried out as a
part of this study.
                                     A—17
88136rl  2

-------
The study by Whitten (1988) used EKMA episodes previously set up for 1982 SIP cal-
culations plus CO estimates based on the CO-to-VOC ratios in the NEDS data base.
Also, RVP changes and volatility increases due to ethanol blends were estimated
from a 1987 RVP impact study by the EPA.  Since the release of the Whitten study,
new emissions guidelines for alternate fuels have been released by the EPA (29 Janu-
ary 1988). Therefore, new EKMA simulations, which use the new EPA guidelines for
alternate fuels, and are appropriate to 1995 projections in New York, are needed.
COMPARISON OF EKMA AND UAM

Some factors regarding changes in mobile-related emissions cannot be addressed with
the EKMA. These factors can be treated by UAM. For example, the diurnal timing
and location of evaporative emissions are not always equal to those of exhaust emis-
sions. The UAM is capable of treating cold-start, hot-soak, highway-cruising and
congested-traffic emissions separately depending on  local data for hourly tempera-
tures, spatially resolved traffic counts, average speeds, and vehicle miles traveled.
Alternatively, EKMA uses constant grams per mile emissions based on data from
standard federal trip and mileage test procedures (FTP) and estimates of local auto-
mobile populations.

The principal differences between EKMA and UAM stem  from the trajectory nature
of EKMA versus the grid nature of UAM.  EKMA treats the atmospheric chemistry of
a single parcel of air as representative of one reaching an observed ozone maxi-
mum. The model simulation begins at 0800 hours with an initial loading of precur-
sors, and more emissions are added each hour on the  basis of county-wide emission
averages. The UAM treats gridded points throughout the urban region (resolved both
horizontally and vertically) for a day or more preceding an ozone episode.  Precur-
sors are emitted and move about within the gridded model region according to the
physical equations governing wind flow, dispersion, and surface deposition. The
secondary pollutants (such as ozone) are formed in both models on the basis of atmo-
spheric chemistry. Hence EKMA provides information at one point in time and space
on the basis of a few hours' highly averaged information,  whereas  UAM provides
information at all points in time and space on the basis of a day or more of highly
resolved information.

It is possible that the UAM will provide results that are significantly different from
those of  the EKMA-based study because of UAM's ability to  treat spatially varying
emissions.  However, this discussion illustrates the vast differences in complexity
and sophistication between the EKMA and UAM models and the potential for some-
what different results.
PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS

The purpose of using EKMA to simulate the same scenarios as those simulated by
UAM is threefold. The first is to use the UAM to support or refute the EKMA results
 88136rl  2                             A-18

-------
obtained in the previous study on the effects of ethanol fuel use on urban ozone con-
centrations in seven U.S. cities (Whitten, 1988).

The second purpose of the EKMA simulations is to estimate the uncertainties invol-
ved in using a trajectory model like EKMA to examine the effects of different  emis-
sion scenarios such as alternative fuel use. Even though the changes in the observed
maximum  ozone may be in agreement for both models, the different reactivities,
source configurations, and three-dimensional structure of the UAM may  result  in the
UAM predicting new hot spots of high ozone concentrations occurring outside of the
EKMA trajectory.

The third purpose of  the EKMA simulations is to study the effects of reactivity of
VOC emissions on ozone formation. EKMA's use of the default and actual reactivity
of the emission scenarios will provide insight into the uncertainties produced by
these assumptions.
EKMA MODELING METHODOLOGY

Two sets of EKMA calculations will be made for each UAM scenario. The first will
be performed in strict accordance with EPA guidelines for using EKMA for post-1987
State Implementation Plans (SIPs) (Hogo and Gery, 1988).  The UAM modeling period
will be viewed as a "design day" in setting up the OZIPM simulation.  However, in
keeping with EKMA guidance, none of the UAM inputs will be used for creating the
EKMA inputs.  County total emissions of NOX, VOC, CO, and other species (correc-
ted for season and MOBILE 3.9) will be used for each emissions scenario.  The VOC
emissions will  be speciated using the default EKMA reactivity.  For the ethanol-
blended fuel cases, these emissions will have higher total VOC and lower CO emis-
sions and will not account for the lower reactivity of ethanol-blended fuels.

The second set of EKMA simulations will be performed in the same manner as the
first set, but the county VOC emissions will be speciated according to the source-
specific speciation profiles for the emission scenario in question.  Thus for the etha-
nol fuel cases, there will be a higher VOC emissions rate, but these simulations will
take into account the lower reactivity of emissions from ethanol-blended fuels.
                                       A-19

88136rl  2

-------
                                 References
Benkley, C. W., and L. L. Schulman.  1979. Estimating hourly mixing depths from
    historical meteorological data. 3. Appl. Meteorol., 18:772.

Burton, C. S.  1988.  Comments on "Ozone Air Quality Models." To be published in 3.
    Air Pollut. Control Assoc.

Douglas, S., and R. Kessler. 1988. "User's Guide to the Diagnostic Wind Model.
    Version 1.0."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California.

Emison, G. A.  1988.  Memo to William G. Laxton, EPA-OAQPS.  May 1988.

Garrett, A. 3.  1981.  Comparison of observed mixed-layer depths to model estimates
    using observed temperatures and wind and  MUS forecasts. 3. Appl. Meteorol.,
    20:1277.

Gery, M.  W., G. Z. Whitten, and 3. P. Killus.  1988. "Development and Testing of the
    CBM-IV for Urban and Regional Modeling." Systems Applications, Inc., San
    Rafael, California (SYSAPP-88/002).

Hogo, H., and M. W. Gery.  1988.  "Guidelines for Using OZIPM-4 with CBM-IV  or
    Optional Mechanisms, Volume 1: Description of the Ozone Isopleth Plotting
    Package, Version 4."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California
    (SYSAPP-88/001).

Morris, R. E., R. C. Kessler, S. G. Douglas, and K. R. Styles.  1987.  "Rocky Mountain
    Acid Deposition Model Assessment: Evaluation of Mesoscale Models for Use in
    Complex Terrain." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-600/3-87-013;
    NTIS PB87-180584-AS).

Pechan, E. H., and Associates.  1988. "National Assessment of VOC, CO, and NOX
    Emissions and Costs for Attainment of the Ozone and CO Standards."

Rao, S. T. 1987.  "Application of the Urban Airshed Model to the New York Metro-
    politan Area." Bureau of Air Research,  Division  of Air Resources, New York
    State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York (CA  No.
    CX811945-01-0; EPA-450/4-87-011).
                                     A-21
88136rl i+

-------
Seinfeld, J. H. 1988. Ozone air quality models. A critical review.  3. Air Pollut.
    Control Assoc., 38(5):616.

Sheih, B. F., N. L. Wesely, and C. J. Walcek.  1986.  The Dry Deposition Module
    for Regional Acid Deposition Models." Argonne National Laboratories
    (DW89930060-01).

Whitten, G. Z. 1988. "Evaluation of the Impact of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends on Urban
    Ozone Formation."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California (SYSAPP-
    88/029.
                                        A-22

-------
                         Appendix B

            PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR URBAN AIRSHED
                  AND EKMA MODELING IN THE
                 ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN AREA
88139 1

-------
                              Final Report

               PROTOCOL DOCUMENT FOR URBAN AIRSHED
                      AND EKMA MODELING IN THE
                     ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN AREA

                             SYSAPP-88/150

                             September 1988
                              Prepared for

                           Mr. John Chamberlin

                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Office of Policy Planning and Evaluation
                          Washington, DC  20460

                                  and

                           Mr. Richard Scheffe

                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                     Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                               Prepared by

                         Systems Applications, Inc.
                          101 Lucas Valley Road
                          San Rafael, CA 94903
                              (415)472-4011
Q9510 88139rl

-------
                                INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND

Four offices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are involved in a joint
EPA-sponsored research study to investigate urban ozone air quality in a number of
U.S. cities. The offices involved are the following: Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Office of
Mobile Sources (OMS), and the Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (OPPE).
The urban areas to be studied include New York, St. Louis, Philadelphia, Dallas, and
Atlanta.  A photochemical modeling analysis will be conducted in each of these urban
areas.  This protocol addresses the St. Louis application in particular.

Over 60 urban areas in the United States have failed to meet the legislated deadline
(31 December 1987) for ozone attainment.  Possible reasons for this include one or
more of the following:  the failure to actually reduce emissions or enforce emission
control requirements, the underestimation of actual urban hydrocarbon emissions,
and/or reliance on overly simplistic modeling approaches for calculating emission
control requirements. In the past, many air quality planners have relied on the
EKMA procedure (Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach) to provide control
requirements for ozone attainment purposes.   The EKMA procedure uses a trajectory
model (OZIPM) to simulate ozone formation of an observed design value concentra-
tion at a downwind monitor.  An ozone isopleth diagram is created (from multiple
simulations) that depicts ozone concentrations as a function of initial  NOX and VOC
concentration. The diagram can be used to equate emission control requirements to
the required percentage change  between the observed ozone design value isopleth
and the isopleth of the National Ambient Air  Quality Standard (NAAQS) (0.12 ppm).

An approach to estimating the effectiveness of alternative ozone attainment strate-
gies uses grid models such  as the Urban Airshed Model (UAM). The UAM numerically
simulates the effects of emissions,  interurban transport of ozone and precursors,
advection, diffusion, chemistry, and surface removal processes on pollutant concen-
trations in a three-dimensional grid covering an urban area.  The UAM has been
applied in a number of urban areas across the United States, Europe, and the Far
East, but some air quality planners  have been reluctant to use the model in other
urban areas mainly because of the time and costs involved in collecting input data
and undertaking extensive  performance evaluations.  However, depending on the
complexity of the ozone problem of the urban area and the particular  needs of
the air quality planners, extensive data bases and model evaluations may not be
88139rl  2                               E

-------
necessary for an application of UAM.  Indeed, no other air quality model currently in
use is subject to this level of performance evaluation. Moreover, even a "simplified"
or less stringent application of UAM appears desirable because it incorporates a rea-
sonably complete mathematical treatment of the physical and chemical processes
believed to govern ozone formation.  Furthermore, because this treatment appears to
be capable of reliably reproducing peak ozone concentrations and ozone concentra-
tions under episode conditions, the UAM provides more useful air quality planning
information than does EKMA (Seinfeld, 1988; Burton, 1988).  As one aspect of this
study, the application of UAM will follow the simplified approach  for the five urban
areas to demonstrate and test the utility of such an approach for air quality planning
purposes and future applications in other urban areas.

In recent years, air quality regulators have found it increasingly difficult to identify
additional urban hydrocarbon emissions that can  be controlled in an effort to reduce
ozone concentrations.  Yet at the same time there has been interest in using renew-
able fuels such as ethanol, which increase the evaporative emissions from light duty
vehicles while reducing exhaust CO emissions. Automobiles can be operated without
modification using 10 percent ethanol blended into gasoline. Substantial utilization
of ethanol can reduce the need for imported oil,  the trade deficit, and farm sub-
sidies, but concern over increased evaporative emissions has hindered its widespread
use, especially in nonattainment areas. A recent EKMA modeling study of ethanol-
blended gasoline in seven urban areas showed a near balance in ozone increases due
to increased evaporative volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and ozone
decreases from reduced exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO).  When the
chemistry of the evaporative emissions was explicitly treated in the model, the
results always showed a net reduction in ozone associated with the use of ethanol
blends (Whitten, 1988).  The results of this study have been questioned recently by
the EPA (Emison, 1988).

Because there is considerable interest nationwide in the potential benefits from the
expanded use of ethanol as an automotive fuel, more studies are needed  to support or
refute the findings of the initial EKMA study. Such studies will provide  guidance for
other urban areas. The current effort will use the Urban Airshed Model  and EKMA
to examine  the effects of using ethanol fuels in the five urban areas. A  comparison
of results will be performed to test the reliability of EKMA for such evaluations.  In
addition to the ethanol emission sensitivity work, the effects of VOC reactivity in
control strategy evaluation will be examined, and future year control strategy simu-
lations will  be performed for the five urban areas.

The version of the UAM used in this project (UAM CBM-IV) contains several
improvements:  (1) a new chemical mechanism of ozone  formation that is further
extended here to treat ethanol and methanol explicitly; (2) a new numerical integra-
tion scheme for horizontal advection and transport; and  (3) revised estimates of dry
deposition.
 88139rl 2

                                         B-2

-------
STUDY OBJECTIVES

The five key objectives to be accomplished in the overall 5-city study are as follows:

     1.    Demonstrate the simplified, limited-data application of UAM for air
           quality planning;

     2.    Determine the effects of Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and ethanol blended
           gasoline on urban ozone concentrations in a number of urban areas, and
           compare UAM results with those obtained with EKMA;

     3.    Investigate and clarify the effects of VOC reactivity potential in emis-
           sion control strategy evaluation;

     4.    Perform SIP control strategy simulations with UAM and EKMA for air
           quality planning and comparison of the two modeling approaches;

     5.    Transfer the UAM modeling data bases and application technology to the
           5 states and EPA.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY PROTOCOL

This protocol is intended to serve as the basis for the performance and successful
completion of a photochemical modeling analysis of the St. Louis metropolitan area
(separate protocols will be prepared for each of the 5 urban areas in the overall
study).  The purpose of this protocol is to describe the methodologies to be followed
throughout the study. It should be viewed as a  set of general guidelines  that provide
focus, consistency, and a basis for consensus for all parties involved in the study.  It
will be reviewed and approved by all participants at the beginning of the study.

At this time, some portions of the modeling analysis have not been finalized in this
document (e.g., the specific emission sensitivity scenarios).  For those items that
have not been finalized,  we provide lists of options that may be followed. For some
items, it will be up to the study participants to choose from the list of options as the
study evolves.
OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY

The ozone air quality study in the St. Louis metropolitan area comprises the follow-
ing tasks:
 88139rl  2

-------
     1.    Prepare a protocol document (this document) that describes the back-
          ground, purpose, and objectives of the study, and the procedures to be
          followed in the remainder of the study. A draft protocol will be prepared
          and sent to all participants for consensus  and approval before the bulk of
          the technical work is initiated.

     2.    Select a modeling episode from a set of four days simulated in a previous
          application of UAM using data collected during the Regional Air Pollution
          Study (RAPS) in 1975 and 1976.

     3.    Prepare future base year and ethanol-use  sensitivity inventories for the
          application of UAM for St. Louis that will use the latest version of the
          model containing the Carbon-Bond IV chemical mechanism. The future
          year inventories will be prepared for 1995 and will be projected from the
          existing 1985 NAPAP inventory.

     4.    Perform an EKMA analysis for the St. Louis area, following the 1987 EPA
          modeling guidelines, using the  future year base case and ethanol-use
          sensitivity inventories.

     5.    Perform an application of UAM for the future year base case and etha-
          nol-use scenarios.  Examine the results and compare with those obtained
          in the EKMA analysis.

     6.    Prepare an interim report that will summarize the ethanol sensitivity
          studies for EKMA and UAM, and provide an overview of the current
          understanding of the factors that influence the effectiveness of precursor
          control, such as VOC reactivity,  NOX emissions character, timing, and
          spatial emission source distribution.

     7.    Perform SIP control strategy simulations  using both UAM and EKMA for
          air quality planning and comparison of the two modeling approaches.
88139rl 2                               B-4

-------
                     2   UAM MODELING METHODOLOGY
This section of the protocol provides details of the Urban Airshed Model (UAM)
application in the St. Louis area including episode selection, input preparation
procedures, base case simulations, and preparation of future year emission scenario
inventories. The results of these simulations will be compared to the results of the
EKMA modeling described in Section 3 of this protocol.
EPISODE SELECTION

This section provides a summary of the procedures that will be used to select the
ozone episode for the CBM-IV UAM modeling. Time constraints do not permit
identification of new ozone episodes or development of additional modeling data
bases for this project. Instead, an ozone episode day will be chosen from a set of
episode days that were developed as part of the original St. Louis Ozone Modeling
Project (EPA, 1983). These days are the following:

           Thursday, May 22, 1975
           Saturday, July 26, 1975
           Tuesday, July 13, 1976
           Friday, October 1, 1976

The following referenced reports will be used to perform the episode selection:

      1.    Regional Air Monitoring System Flow and Procedures Manual (Rockwell,
           1977).

      2.    Final Evaluation of Urban-Scale Photochemical Air Quality Simulation
           Models (ESRL, 1982).

      3.    The St. Louis Ozone Modeling Project (EPA, 1983).

      4.    The Surface Ozone Record for the Regional Air Pollution Study, 1975-
           1976 (Atmospheric Environment, 1982).

Data bases containing hourly ozone concentrations are not available for review
during the selection process.  Some ozone data was plotted for selected stations in
various reports; however, only peak ozone concentrations for these days are known.
88139rl  2                              B-5

-------
Observed wind data used to create the original three-dimensional wind fields for
UAM will be used to create interpolated surface wind fields with a distance-weighted
interpolation algorithm. Surface wind fields will be created to determine the hourly
flow patterns for each episode day.  These surface wind fields will be used to track
air parcels released at various times and locations to determine (a) the timing of the
"flushing" of initial conditions from the modeling domain, (b) the general area of
origin of material affecting peak observed ozone concentrations, and (c) the
influence of boundary conditions on calculated ozone concentrations.

The episode will be selected on the basis of the following criteria:

           High and widespread ozone concentrations
           Minimal effects of boundary conditions
           Organized transport conditions
           No atypical meteorological conditions

The episode selection will be  performed immediately following the completion of the
protocol. The episode selection will be summarized in a technical memorandum and
sent to all participating members for review.
UAM INPUT PREPARATION PROCEDURES

As summarized in the previous section, one of the modeling days formulated in the
previous EPA UAM study will be used in this study. The latest version of the UAM
containing the Carbon-Bond IV (CBM-IV) chemical mechanism (Gery et al., 1988) will
be applied in this study. To ensure that the modeling data base for the episode
selected has been properly converted on our in-house computer system, a base case
simulation will be re-run using the Carbon-Bond II version of UAM. All subsequent
modeling will involve the CBM-IV version of UAM.
 UAM Modeling Grid Specification

 The modeling will be performed on the original St. Louis modeling grid, which con-
 sists of 17 by 22 grid cells with a horizontal dimension of 4 km, covering an area 68
 by 88 km. The modeling grid is depicted in Figure 2-1.  It covers parts of Missouri
 and Illinois, encompassing the majority of the smaller, outlying urban areas
 surrounding metropolitan St. Louis. The grid is located in UTM zone 15 with the
 origin set at 706,000. m Easting and 4,326,000. m  Northing.
 The following 13 input files are required for UAM modeling analyses:

 DIFFBREAK     This file contains the daytime mixing height or nighttime inversion
                 height for each column of cells at the beginning and end of each
                 hour of the simulation.

-------
FIGURE 2-1.  The St. Louis metropolitan area UAM modeling grid and RAPS station
locations.  (Grid cells are 4 x 4 km).  (Source:  EPA, 1983).
B81 39
                                     B-7

-------
REGIONTOP
WIND
METSCALARS
AIRQUALITY
BOUNDARY
TOPCONC
This file contains the height of each column of cells at the begin-
ning and end of each hour of the simulation. If this height is
greater than the mixing height, the cell or cells above the mixing
height are assumed to be within an inversion.

This file contains the x and y components of the wind velocity for
every grid cell for each hour of the simulation.  Also the maximum
wind speed for the entire grid and average wind speeds at each
boundary for each hour are included in this file.

This file contains the hourly values of the meteorological
parameters that do not vary spatially.  These scalars are the NC>2
photolysis rate constant, the concentration of water  vapor, the
temperature gradient above and below the inversion base, the
atmospheric pressure, and the exposure class.

This file contains the initial concentrations of each species for
each grid cell at the start  of the simulation.

This file contains the location of the modeling region boundaries.
This file also contains the  concentration of each species that is
used as the boundary condition along each boundary segment at
each vertical level.

This file contains the concentration of each species for the area
above the modeling region. These concentrations are the boundary
conditions for vertical integration.
TEMPERATURE  This file contains the hourly temperature for each surface layer
                 grid cell.
EMISSIONS
 PTSOURCE
 TERRAIN
This file contains the ground-level emissions of NO, NO2, seven
carbon bond categories, and CO for each grid square for each hour
of the simulation.

This file contains the point source information, including the stack
height, temperature and flow rate, the plume rise, the grid cell
into which the emissions are emitted, and the emissions rates for
NO, NO2> seven carbon bond categories, and CO for each point
source for each hour.

This file contains the value of the surface roughness and deposition
factor for each grid square.
 88139rl 2
                      B-8

-------
CHEMPARAM    This file contains information regarding the chemical species to be
                 simulated including reaction rate constants, upper and lower
                 bounds, activation energy, and reference temperature.

SIMCONTROL    This file contains the simulation control information such as the
                 time of the simulation, file option information, default informa-
                 tion, and information on integration and chemistry time steps.

The majority of the input files used in the previous St. Louis application of UAM will
be used "as is" in this application.  However, the WIND file will be recreated using a
new technique, and other files affected by the change to CBM-IV will also be
updated. The recommended procedures for preparing those  files that will be changed
in the St. Louis application are summarized in the following subsections.
REGIONTOP - The original St. Louis application used a temporally varying height for
     the top of the region that was situated 400 m above the hourly mixing height
     (DIFFBREAK) value. For the current study, we will use a constant value for
     the top of the region, tentatively chosen to be 1600 m.  The final selection for
     the top of the region will be based on the maximum mixing height used in the
     modeling day selected.

WIND - The wind fields created for the original St. Louis application used the
     WINDSET preprocessor algorithm. The three-dimensional wind fields created
     for a number of the modeling days, however, did not always replicate the
     measured data well.  In the new application, we recommend using a wind model
     along with the measured data to derive new wind fields in an attempt to avoid
     problems encountered in the past. Hourly wind speed and direction data will be
     used along with the Hybrid Diagnostic Wind Model (HDWM) (Douglas and
     Kessler, 1988; Morris et al., 1987) to create new three-dimensional modeling
     wind fields.

METSCALARS - The  parameters contained in this file will be examined and reviewed
     to determine whether they are to be changed/updated.  Available
     meteorological data collected in the modeling region will be used to complete
     this file for those parameters that are changed.  The spatially constant,
     temporally varying parameters include estimates for NC>2 photolysis rate,
     water concentration, exposure class, atmospheric pressure, and temperature
     gradients  above and below the mixing height.  Because of changes in the CBM-
     IV chemistry, the NC^ photolysis rate constants may need updating. Because
     of changes to the REGIONTOP file,  the temperature gradients above the
     mixing height will have to be updated.

AIRQUALITY - The species initial concentration field, the AIRQUALITY file, will be
     created by using air quality data collected at monitors in the modeling
 88 I39r I  2
                                       B- 9

-------
     domain. The values will correspond to the specific initial hour of the simula-
     tion, which is not known at this time. The upper-layer initial field will use
     values specified in the TOPCONC file. The AIRQUALITY file will be updated
     with the new CBM-IV species.

BOUNDARY - The new CBM-IV species will be added to the BOUNDARY file for the
     CBM-IV simulations.

TOPCONC - New CBM-IV species will  be added to this file before the UAM CBM-IV
     is exercised.

EMISSIONS - The original inventory used in the previous St. Louis application
     containing information on the CBM-II species will be updated to correspond to
     a CBM-IV inventory.  This will be accomplished by splitting total aromatics
     (ARO)  into the new CBM-IV species toluene (TOL) and xylene (XYL), and
     splitting total carbonyls (CARB)  into the new CBM-IV species formaldehyde
     (FORM) and other aldehydes (ALD2). The splitting factors for the new CBM-IV
     species will be taken from the  recently published EKMA guidelines for CBM-IV
     (Hogo and Gery, 1988). This new base year CBM-IV inventory is needed for a
     new CBM-IV base case simulation to ensure that the changes made to all of the
     other input files have been correctly implemented.  The methodology  for creat-
     ing the future year emission scenario inventories is presented in the next sec-
     tion.

PTSOURCE - The CBM-II input file containing point source information will be up-
     dated for the new CBM-IV base case simulation following the procedure per-
     formed for the low level emissions.  Methodology  for deriving the future year
     base case and emission scenario point source files is presented in the next sec-
     tion.

TERRAIN - This file will be updated using land-use information.  It will contain
     surface roughness and deposition information as a function of land use (no
     terrain height information). The deposition values as a function of land use are
     derived from studies performed by the Argonne National Laboratory (Sheih et
     al., 1986). These values are summarized in Table 2-1.

CHEMPARAM - The CHEMPARAM  file contains information regarding (1) the
     species to be modeled by the UAM; (2) upper and lower bounds on numerical
     and steady-state calculations along with species "resistance" to dry deposition;
     and (3) the rate constants for the photochemical reactions.  Before the CBM-IV
     base case simulation is performed, the CHEMPARAM file will be updated to
     correspond to the new species  simulated with the new mechanism.

SIMCONTROL - The SIMCONTROL  file controls the actual simulation parameters of
     the UAM run (i.e., simulation time period, minimum time steps, output time
     intervals). At this time it is not  known when the simulation will be initiated;
 88139rl  2

                                      B- 10

-------
              TABLE 2-1.   Surface roughness and deposition factors
              based on studies by Argonne National Laboratories.
Land Use Surface Roughness Deposition
Category (meters) Factor
Urban
Agricultural
Range
Deciduous Forest
Coniferous Forest
including wetland
Mixed Forest
Water
Barren land
Nonforest Wetlands
Mixed Agricultural
and range
Rocky (low shrubs)
3.00
0.25
0.05
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.0001
0.002
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.2
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.03
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.3
88139rl 3                            B- 11

-------
     however, all other information contained in the file will not change from one
     simulation to another.
Assessment of Model Performance for the Base Case

After the modeling inputs have been finalized and rendered consistent with UAM
CBM-IV requirements, a new base case simulation will be run. Before using the
updated modeling data base in any future year emission scenario simulations, it is
essential that at least a limited assessment of model performance be  undertaken,
even in this low-cost, simplified UAM application. The model's ability to predict the
level and spatial orientation of the observed ozone field will be assessed by compar-
ing the UAM-calcuiated concentrations with the measured data.

If we can locate the observed hourly data, we will compute a limited set of model
performance statistics that summarize error,  bias, and the model's ability to
calculate the peak ozone concentration. In this application, no specific performance
criteria will be established, and no strict performance evaluation will be
undertaken.  However, if the modeling system shows very poor performance, we may
undertake one (or more as time allows) diagnostic simulation(s) to identify a range of
alternatives for improving model performance. For  example, a diagnostic simulation
may involve changes to the three-dimensional wind field (within the range of the
uncertainty of the data used to prepare the field) if  spatial alignment problems occur
in the base case simulation.  If necessary, these diagnostic simulations will only be
undertaken after consultation with the project's technical representative. Future
year emission scenario simulations using the CBM-IV modeling data base will be
performed only after there is agreement from participating technical representatives
that performance in the base case is adequate.
Future Year Emission Inventory Development

Improved Urban Airshed Model performance is achieved when emissions data in a
very specific and detailed format is available.  UAM requires a spatially
disaggregated and temporally allocated emissions inventory. Performance is
improved if a chemically speciated emissions inventory is obtained, although
speciation could be achieved by using default speciation profiles, as is customarily
done with EKMA.  Meeting these requirements often entails the collection of
additional emissions-related information such as population distribution and
industrial activity data.

In this study we will be using the 1985 NAPAP (National Acid Precipitation Assess-
ment Program) Emissions Inventory as the base year from which all future year emis-
sion scenarios will be developed.  The future year selected for use in this study is
 1995.  The 1985 NAPAP Emissions Inventory consists of annual county-wide area
source emissions (including mobile sources), and annual emissions for  large point
 88139rl 2

-------
sources along with stack parameters (i.e., stack height, diameter, flow rate, and
temperature). The county-wide area source emissions will be disaggregated onto the
gridded modeling domain using the gridded population distribution. Source categories
will be classified as related to the population distribution, inversely related to the
population distribution, or not related at all to population, and gridded accordingly.
The annual emission rates will be adjusted for each source category to summer
weekday emissions by using scaling factors based upon typical values of monthly
throughputs and weekday factors. Likewise, hourly variations in emissions will be
based upon typical diurnal activity levels for each source category.

The stationary source emissions for the 1995 scenario year will be projected from
1985 NAPAP emissions by utilizing growth factors by source category available from
an EPA-sponsored study (Pechan, 1988).  Mobile source emissions will be prepared
using scaling factors provided by the EPA Office of Mobile Sources specifically for
each scenario to be analyzed.

Several emissions inventories will be used for  the limited performance evaluation of
the UAM and assessment of the effects of alternative fuel use and SIP control
strategies. The following list describes each of the emission scenarios:

      CBM-II 1975 or 1976 case - the inventory used  for the past UAM/CBM-II appli-
      cations. This emissions scenario will be used to verify that the UAM inputs are
      set up  correctly on the Systems Applications' computer. This inventory is valid
      for 1975 or 1976.

      CBM-IV 1975 or 1976 case - a modified version of the CBM-II meteorological
      case for CBM-IV species.  This inventory will be used to verify that the
      UAM/CBM-IV is operating properly and predicts ozone patterns comparable to
      those predicted by the UAM/CBM-II.  This inventory is valid for 1975 or 1976.
      The creation of this inventory was described in the input preparation section
      above.

      1985 NAPAP - gridding of 1985 NAPAP  inventory for CBM-IV species, as is, to
      the modeling domain.

      1995 base case - this inventory is based on the  1985 NAPAP county inventory.
      Stationary source emissions are projected to 1995 using growth factors from
      EPA (Pechan, 1988). Mobile source emissions will be based on values provided
      by OMS. The emission scenarios will correspond to different assumptions in the
      mobile source emissions.

      1995 Emission Scenarios - these inventories will reflect changes in VOC, NO  ,
      and CO due to assumptions of future changes in mobile source emission rates
      such as changes in Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and use of ethanol blended fuels.
      For St. Louis, EPA/OPPE has defined 4 separate emission scenarios as follows:
 88139rl  2                               B-13

-------
          Scenario #1 - 1995 base case with mobile emissions at current RVP values
          (11.5 psi) with running losses

          Scenario #2 - 1995 base case with mobile emissions at low RVP values
          (9.0 psi) with running losses

          Scenario #5 - 1995 base case with 50 percent ethanol penetration* and a
          10 percent ethanol blend at  low RVP (9.0 psi) plus 1 psi exemption with
          running losses

          Scenario #7 - 1995 base case with 100 percent penetration and enough
          Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE) to produce 2 percent oxygenated fuels
          with running losses
SO? Inventory Development

In addition to the ethanol blended fuels inventories prepared to determine ozone sen-
sitivity information, an inventory reflecting SIP information for the St. Louis area
will be prepared based on the 1985 NAPAP inventory.  This inventory will be
developed in consultation with representatives from the State of Missouri, the State
of Illinois, EPA Region VII, and EPA OAQPS.
Emission Scenario Simulations

On the basis of emission scenario options outlined in the previous section, a subset
will be chosen for UAM modeling. In addition to changes in the input emissions files,
the initial condition (AIRQUALITY) and boundary condition (BOUNDARY) files will
be changed to reflect general estimates of future year air quality.  Estimates for
initial conditions will be changed (increased/decreased) to reflect changes in the
emission inventory for  the St. Louis metropolitan area from 1975 to 1995 based on
projected growth and anticipated future emission controls.  To calculate a future
year estimate, the urban background estimate will first be subtracted from the
actual meteorological base year concentration for 1975 or 1976.  The resulting con-
centration will be changed in proportion to changes in emissions.  The background
will then be added to this concentration to arrive at a future year estimate.  Simi-
larly, on the basis of emission changes in the St. Louis area, the upwind inflow boun-
dary conditions will be changed to reflect forecasted changes in emissions between
* In this context, "penetration" is defined as the change from one type of fuel to
 another. A 50 percent ethanol penetration scenario is one in which 50 percent
 of fuel used in vehicles is converted from gasoline to an ethanol-blended fuel.


88139rl 2                             -   ,.

-------
1975 and 1995.  Only one set of future year initial and boundary conditions will be
selected and used for all modeling pertaining to a given future year.  We will not use
multiple sets that reflect specific differences in emissions between scenarios.

The results of the UAM simulations will be presented in the form of ozone difference
plots. These  plots are created by subtracting the calculated ozone concentration of
the future year base case (for each grid cell, for each hour) from the concentration
obtained in the emission sensitivity simulations.  This results in hourly isopleth maps
that show both  the magnitude and spatial extent of differences in ozone concentra-
tions due to changes in emissions. Changes in calculated peak ozone will also be
summarized in tabular  format.
SIP Emission Scenario UAM Simulation

After a SIP modeling inventory has been prepared and approved by all affected
participants, at least one future year SIP simulation will be undertaken. It is antici-
pated that the initial and boundary condition values may have to be changed to
reflect the forecasted changes in the inventory from 1985 to some future year.
Initial and boundary conditions will be changed in the same manner as described
above for the future year ethanol sensitivity simulations.  The results of this SIP
simulation will be compared to results obtained with EKMA.
 88139rl  2                              B-15

-------
                    3   EKMA MODELING METHODOLOGY
BACKGROUND

A recent study used the simple photochemical modeling approach known as EKMA
(Empirical Kinetics Modeling Approach) to investigate the possible impacts on urban
ozone formation from the use of ethanol-blended gasoline fuels (Whitten, 1988).  The
study addressed the comparative reactivities of the relevant ozone precursor emis-
sions affected by the use of ethanol blends. Atmospheric conditions were varied to
represent those found in seven cities. The key finding of the study was a near
balance between ozone increases from enhanced evaporative emissions of VOC and
ozone decreases from reduced exhaust emissions of CO.  This was the first study to
consider mitigation of ozone VOC precursors through CO reductions. When the
chemistry of the individual evaporative emissions species was explicitly treated in
the model, the results always showed a net reduction in ozone associated with the
use of ethanol blends. However, the U.S. EPA recommends simplified treatment of
reactivity in the EKMA, whereby the reactivity of all VOC emissions species is
treated as being equal to the reactivity of overall average VOC.  While this simpli-
fied treatment overestimates the reactivity of the increased evaporative emissions,
the EKMA modeling results indicated small net reductions in ozone formation from
the use of ethanol blends in some cases, and in others the simplified reactivity
assumption showed a small net increase in ozone. Although the existing EKMA
model can explicitly treat the chemistry of evaporative automotive emissions, the
simplified treatment of reactivity is more consistent with the overall simplified
philosophy embodied  in regulatory applications of EKMA.

The negative  or positive direction of the small ozone impacts derived from the
simplified treatment of VOC reactivity and the size of the ozone reductions derived
from the explicit chemical treatment of the affected emissions appear to depend on
the mobile-related fraction of total VOC and the ratio of CO emissions to VOC emis-
sions.  Areas with low mobile-related VOC fractions and high CO-to-VOC ratios are
expected to show the largest net ozone reductions if ethanol fuels are used because,
under these conditions, the overall ambient increases in VOC will be smaller, and the
decreases in ambient CO concentrations will be larger. However, it is important to
increase the confidence in the preliminary EKMA analyses thus far carried out.
Further UAM and EKMA evaluations are thus warranted, and will be carried out as a
part of this study.
                                       B-17

-------
The study by Whitten (1988) used EKMA episodes previously set up for 1982 SIP cal-
culations plus CO estimates based on the CO-to-VOC ratios in the NEDS data base.
Also, RVP changes and volatility increases due to ethanol blends were estimated
from a 1987 RVP impact study by the EPA.  Since the release of the Whitten study,
new emissions guidelines for alternate fuels have been released by the EPA (29 Janu-
ary 1988). Therefore, new EKMA simulations, which use the new EPA guidelines for
alternate fuels, and are appropriate to 1995 projections in St. Louis, are needed.
COMPARISON OF EKMA AND UAM

Some factors regarding changes in mobile-related emissions cannot be addressed with
the EKMA. These factors can be treated by UAM. For example, the diurnal timing
and location of evaporative emissions are not always equal to those of exhaust emis-
sions. The UAM is capable of treating cold-start, hot-soak, highway-cruising and
congested-traffic emissions separately depending on local data for hourly tempera-
tures, spatially resolved traffic counts, average speeds, and vehicle miles traveled.
Alternatively, EKMA uses constant grams per mile emissions based on data from
standard federal trip and mileage test procedures (FTP) and estimates of local auto-
mobile populations.

The principal differences between EKMA and UAM stem from the trajectory nature
of EKMA versus the grid nature of UAM.  EKMA treats the atmospheric chemistry of
a single parcel of air as representative of one reaching an observed ozone maxi-
mum. The model simulation begins at 0800 hours with an initial loading of precur-
sors, and more emissions are added each hour on the basis of county-wide emission
averages. The UAM treats gridded points throughout the urban region (resolved both
horizontally and vertically) for a day or more preceding an ozone episode.  Precur-
sors are emitted and move about within the gridded model region according to the
physical equations governing wind flow, dispersion, and surface deposition. The
secondary pollutants (such as ozone) are formed in both models on the basis of atmo-
spheric chemistry. Hence EKMA provides information at one point in time and space
on the basis of a few hours' highly averaged information, whereas UAM provides
information at all points in time and space on the basis of a day or more of highly
resolved information.

It is possible that the UAM will provide results that are significantly different from
those of  the EKMA-based study because of UAM's ability to treat spatially varying
emissions. However, this discussion illustrates the vast differences  in complexity
and sophistication between  the EKMA and UAM models and the potential for some-
what different results.
 PURPOSE OF ANALYSIS

 The purpose of using EKMA to simulate the same scenarios as those simulated by
 UAM is threefold. The first is to use the UAM to support or refute the EKMA
 88139rl 2                            B-18

-------
results obtained in the previous study on the effects of ethanol fuel use on urban
ozone concentrations in seven U.S. cities (Whitten, 1988).

The second purpose of the EKMA simulations is to estimate the uncertainties invol-
ved in using a trajectory model like EKMA to examine the effects of different emis-
sion scenarios such as alternative fuel use. Even though the changes in the observed
maximum ozone may be in agreement for both models, the different reactivities,
source configurations, and three-dimensional structure of the UAM may result in the
UAM predicting new hot spots of high ozone concentrations occurring outside of the
EKMA trajectory.

The third purpose of the EKMA simulations is to study the effects of reactivity of
VOC emissions on ozone formation.  EKMA's use of the default and actual reactivity
of the emission scenarios will provide insight into the uncertainties produced by
these assumptions.
EKMA MODELING METHODOLOGY

Two sets of EKMA calculations will be made for each UAM scenario.  The first will
be performed in strict accordance with EPA guidelines for using EKMA for post-1987
State Implementation Plans (SIPs) (Hogo and Gery, 1988).  The UAM modeling period
will be viewed as a "design day" in setting up the OZIPM simulation.  However, in
keeping with EKMA guidance, none of the UAM inputs will be used for creating the
EKMA inputs.  County total emissions of NOX, VOC, CO, and other species (correc-
ted for season and MOBILE 3.9) will be used for each emissions scenario.  The VOC
emissions will  be speciated using the default EKMA reactivity. For the ethanol-
blended fuel cases, these emissions will have higher total VOC and lower CO emis-
sions and will not account for the lower reactivity of ethanol-blended fuels.

The second set of EKMA simulations will be performed in the same manner as the
first set, but the county VOC emissions will be speciated according to the source-
specific speciation profiles for the emission scenario in question. Thus for the etha-
nol fuel cases, there will be a higher VOC emissions rate, but these simulations will
take into account the lower reactivity of emissions from ethanol-blended fuels.
SIP Emission Scenario EKMA Simulation

In addition to the ethanol fuel sensitivity simulation using EKMA, a SIP simulation
will also be performed.  Emission inventory information derived from the UAM grid-
ded SIP inventory will be used to supply information for the application of EKMA.
The results of this analysis will be compared to the information derived from the
UAM SIP simulation for St. Louis.
 88139rl  2                                B-19

-------
                                 References
Benkley, C. W., and L. L. Schulman. 1979. Estimating hourly mixing depths from
    historical meteorological data.  3. Appl. Meteorol., 18:772.

Burton, C. S.  1988.  Comments on "Ozone Air Quality Models." Submitted to 3. Air
    Pollut. Control Assoc.

Cole, H. S., D. E. Layland, G. K. Moss, and C. F. Newberry.  1983.  "The St. Louis
    Ozone Modeling Project." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Tri-
    angle Park, North Carolina (EPA-450/4-83-019).

Douglas, S., and R. Kessler.  1988. "User's Guide to the Diagnostic Wind Model.
    Version 1.0."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California.

Emison, G. A.  1988.  Memo to William G. Laxton, EPA-OAQPS, May 1988.

Gery, M.  W., G. Z. Whitten, and J. P. Killus.  1988.  "Development and Testing of the
    CBM-IV for Urban and Regional Modeling." Systems Applications, Inc., San
    Rafael, California (SYSAPP-88/002).

Hogo, H., and M. W. Gery. 1988.  "Guidelines for Using OZIPM-f with CBM-IV  or
    Optional Mechanisms, Volume 1: Description of the Ozone Isopleth Plotting
    Package, Version 4."  Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California
    (SYSAPP-88/001).

Morris, R. E., R. C. Kessler, S. G. Douglas, and K. R. Styles.  1987.  "Rocky Mountain
    Acid Deposition Model Assessment:  Evaluation of Mesoscale Models for Use in
    Complex Terrain." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-600/3-87-013;
    NTIS PB87-180584-AS).

Pechan, E. H., and Associates.  1988. "National Assessment of VOC, CO, and NOX
    Emissions and Costs for Attainment of the Ozone and CO Standards."

Rao, S. T. 1987. "Application of the Urban Airshed Model to the New York Metro-
    politan Area." Bureau of Air Research, Division of Air Resources,  New York
    State Department of  Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York (CA No.
    CX811945-01 -0; EPA-450/4-87-011).

-------
Seinfeld, J. H. 1988. Ozone air quality models. A critical review.  3. Air Pollut.
    Control Assoc., 38(5):616.

Sheih, B. F., N. L. Wesely, and C. J. Walcek. 1986.  "The Dry Deposition Module
    for Regional Acid Deposition Models."  Argonne National Laboratories
    (DW89930060-01).

Whitten, G. Z. 1988. "Evaluation of the Impact of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends on Urban
    Ozone Formation." Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California (SYSAPP-
    88/029.
                                         •a  OT
 88139rl "t

-------
                           Appendix C




           EPISODE SELECTION FOR ST. LOUIS UAM MODELING
88151

-------
                                 Appendix C

             EPISODE SELECTION FOR ST. LOUIS UAM MODELING
INTRODUCTION

This appendix provides a summary of the procedures that were used to select an
ozone episode for the CBM-IV UAM modeling of St. Louis for the EPA Five Cities
modeling project.  Time constraints did not permit identification of new ozone epi-
sodes or development of additional modeling data bases for this project.  Instead, an
ozone episode day was chosen from a set of four episode days that were developed  as
part of the original St. Louis Ozone Modeling Project (EPA, 1983). The modeling
data bases for these days were obtained from EPA.  The raw data from which the
inputs were created were not available for review.  The modeling days include the
following:

             Thursday, 22 May 1975
             Saturday, 26 July 1975
             Tuesday, 13 July 1976
             Friday, 1 October 1976

The episode selection was based on the UAM input files and information that could
be derived from the following reports:

     1.   Regional Air Monitoring System Flow and Procedures Manual (Rockwell,
          1977).

     2.   Final Evaluation of Urban-Scale Photochemical Air Quality Simulation
          Models (ESRL, 1982).

     3.   The St. Louis Ozone Modeling Project (EPA, 1983).

     4.   The Surface Ozone Record for the Regional Air Pollution Study,  1975-
          1976 (Atmospheric Environment, 1982).
88151  14                              C-l

-------
SELECTION METHODOLOGY

The episode-selection process in which candidate days are chosen for UAM modeling
usually involves an intense review of all available meteorological and air quality
data.  Air quality data are examined to determine days with high and widespread
ozone concentrations. Meteorological data are examined to determine the specific
factors causing the high observed ozone (e.g., temperatures, winds, sky cover).
Urban areas located in complex geographical locations may observe high ozone con-
centrations resulting from different meteorological mechanisms. For these loca-
tions, a number of episodes should be chosen  to include all of the meteorological
regimes that cause high ozone in the urban area.  In this study, we were constrained
to choosing only one modeling day, and only a limited amount of data were
examined.  Data bases containing hourly ozone concentrations were not available for
review during the selection process. Some ozone data were plotted for selected sta-
tions in various reports; however, only peak ozone concentrations for these days are
known.  Table C-l presents a summary of the meteorological and air quality
parameters for the episode days.
TABLE C-1.   Summary of meteorological and air  quality parameters
observed  for selected days  in  St.  Louis.
Date
5/22/75
7/26/75
7/13/76
•10/1/76
WS
(m/s)
1.1
1.0
2.3
0.6
WD
(deg)
224 '
139
1H5
222
Temp
(ฐC)
29
26
28
22
Solar
(ly/min)
1.12
0.98
1.02
0.78
Max MH
(m)
1504
1477
1853
527
Max Oo
(pphm)
19.5
18.5
22.3
24.6
The modeling episode was selected on the basis of the following criteria:

      High and widespread ozone concentrations
      Minimal effects of boundary conditions
      Organized transport conditions
      No atypical meteorological conditions

Because the 1 October 1976 day was an atypical ozone event that occurred outside
the normal ozone season and was characterized by unusually low mixing heights, cool
temperatures, and stagnation conditions, it was not considered further in the
selection process.  Although it is an interesting event,  it is not reflective of a normal
summertime ozone event in St. Louis.
 88151
                                        C-2

-------
Data from the remaining days were examined further to determine differences in the
flow fields and effects of boundary and initial conditions on modeled concentra-
tions. The wind files for each of the modeling days were used to track air parcels
released at various times and locations to determine (1) the timing of the "flushing"
of initial conditions from the modeling domain, (2) the general area of origin of
material affecting peak observed ozone concentrations, and (3) the influence of
boundary conditions on calculated ozone concentrations.

Three sets of surface air parcel trajectories were performed for each of the three
modeling days. These trajectories include the following:

      1.    Forward trajectories starting at 0500 LST in the center of, and surround-
           ing, the city of St. Louis. These trajectories were tracked until the end
           of the day or until they moved out of the modeling domain.  They were
           released to determine the fate of the initial condition field in the center
           of the city.

      2.    A backward  trajectory from the site and time of the observed ozone
           maximum.  This trajectory was run to determine the general origin of the
           parcel affecting the monitor showing peak observed ozone concentra-
           tions.

      3.    Forward trajectories from the edges of the inflow boundaries starting at
           0500 LST, with additional releases every two hours until 1900 LST. These
           trajectories  were released to determine the extent and influence of the
           boundary conditions on the calculated ozone concentrations. The inflow
           boundaries were determined after examination of the plotted surface
           wind fields.

Figures C-l, C-2, and C-3 present these three types of trajectories, respectively, for
22 May 1975, 26 July  1975, and 13 July 1976.
Thursday, 22 May 1975

The relatively slow southwesterly flow on this day has transported the 0500 LST
initial condition field north and east, and only the northern portions of the initial
conditions have been transported out of the region by the time of the peak observed
ozone (1500 LST).  The peak observed ozone was measured at RAPS station 101,
located in downtown St. Louis along the Mississippi River.  The back trajectory shows
the general origin of the parcel to be south of the city. Boundary conditions from
the southern and western boundaries are not transported near the location of the
peak observed ozone concentration.
                                        C-3
 88151  li*

-------
Saturday, 26 July 1975

Because of the light southeasterly winds, the 0500 LSI initial condition field for this
day is transported northwestward and not flushed from the modeling region by the
time of the observed peak (1500 LSI). The peak observed ozone was measured at
RAPS station 113, located just north of downtown St. Louis. The backward trajec-
tory shows the origin of the parcel to be located near the southern edge of the  St.
Louis metropolitan area at 0500 LST. Inflow boundary conditions  from the east and
south do  not influence the area of the observed peak ozone.
Tuesday, 13 July 1976

The relatively strong southerly flow on this day has transported a large portion of the
0500 LST initial condition field to the north and west, out of the modeling domain by
the time of the observed peak ozone (1600 LST). Peak ozone was observed at RAPS
station 114, located north of downtown St. Louis. The back trajectory shows that the
parcel arriving at this station at the time of the peak originated just north of Belle-
ville, Illinois.  Because of higher wind speeds (compared to the other two days) for
this day, the boundary conditions influence a larger portion of the modeling domain
by the time of the peak; however, the area of the peak is free from the influence of
boundary conditions.

Given the selection criteria and  the results of the trajectory analysis, it appears that
any of these three episodes would be suitable for (JAM modeling. The 13  July 1976
day is attractive because it (1) has the largest observed ozone of the three days, (2)
has well-organized transport conditions, and (3) is relatively  free of the effects of
initial conditions.  However, the 13 July 1976 day also is the most influenced by
boundary conditions of the three candidate days, although the boundary conditions do
not appear to influence the region of maximum ozone concentrations. Stagnant
meteorological conditions are prevalent on both 22 May and  26 July 1975. Initial
conditions for both of the 1975 days may affect concentrations in the region of the
maximum ozone concentrations. The 26 July day is a Saturday, when atypical
emission characteristics exist. The 22 May day occurs fairly early in the  ozone
season; however, it appears to have meteorological conditions fairly typical of an
ozone episode. Since the 13 July 1976 day contains the highest observed ozone of the
candidate days, has well-organized transport conditions, and is minimally affected by
initial and boundary conditions, it was chosen as the episode day for the PLANR use
of the UAM (CB-IV) for St. Louis.
 88151  11
                                        C-4

-------
                           FIGURE 1

                 AIR PARCEL TRAJECTORIES FOR
               ST. LOUIS FOR THURSDAY, MAY 22, 1975
88 15 1  1>*

-------
                                NORTH
 706
20
10
          J	I
                         756
                                        10
                                SOUTH
                                                        j	I
                                                                   1;>00
                                                                    4286
                                                                    4236
   Initialized on
  0 500 ON 5/22/75
  (f) 500 ON 5/22/75
  (5) 500 ON 5/22/75
  0 500 ON 5/22/75
  (ง) 500 ON 5/22/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Far-ward Trajectories

                C-6

-------
                            NORTH
106 711 716  721 726 731  736 741  746 751 756  761 766  771
<ฃฃ
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
(
I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1
_ —
-
-
—
- -
-
-
—
>-
200
~
- —
—
-
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1
SOUTH
Initialized on
4321
4316
4311
4306
4301
4296
4291
4286
4281
4276
4271
4266
4261
4256
4251
4246
4241
,ฃ236
    l&OO ON  5/22/7S          Backward Trajectories

                    ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                                  C-7

-------
                             NORTH
 706
20
        756
10
                     2400
                                                              4286
                                               X2400
  0
10
                                                              4236
                             SOUTH
Initialized
7) 500 ON
f) 500 ON
g) 500 ON
0 500 ON
gl 500 ON
rS\  OK
on
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
                      ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                            Forward Trajectories


                                     C-8

-------
                                NORTH
 706
                                               756
20
10
                       2400
                                                                    4286
                                2400
                              1800
 0
                                        10
                                                                    4236
                                SOUTH
 Initialized on
0  700 ON  5/22/75
(ง)  700 ON  5/22/75
(5)  700 ON  5/22/75
0  700 ON  5/22/75
(ง)  700 ON  5/22/75
fa  TOO OH  5/22/75
                        ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                               Fonrard Trajectories

                                         C-9

-------
                             NORTH
 706
20
756
10
                  2400
                                                              4836
                laoo
        1200
                                    10
                                                              4236
                             SOUTH
Initialized on
7)
D
[5)
5)
ง)
^
900
900
900
900
900
ooo
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
CM
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
                      ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                            Forward Trajectories


                                    C-10

-------
                                NORTH
 706
                         756
20
10
 0.
                2400
                                                                    4286
                         2400
                                          X2400
                                                              2400
                        1SOO
                                           1800
                                                             iaoo
  0
                10
                                             4236
                                SOUTH
  Unitialized  on
 0  1100 ON  5/22/75
 (ง)  1100 ON  5/22/75
 (|)  1100 ON  5/22/75
 0  1100 ON  5/22/75
 (5)  1100 ON  5/22/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories

                C-ll

-------
                              NORTH
 706
756
20
10
              2400
            1800
                                                                4286
                         2400
                                         <2400
                                                           2400
                       1800
                                         1800
                                                          1800
                                      10
                                                                4236
                              SOUTH
Initialized
0
(ง)
(D
0
(D
rtfN
1300
1SOO
1300
1300
1300
1OOO
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
ON
on
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
5/22/75
                       ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                             Forward Trajectories

                                     C-12

-------
                                NORTH
 706
20
10
            2400
           1800
                         2400
                       1800
                         756
                                           2400
                                          1800
                                        10
                                                                    4286
                                                             2400  -
                                     1800
                                                                    4236
                                SOUTH
   Initialized  on
  0  1500 ON  5/22/75
  (2)  1500 ON  5/22/75
  (5)  1500 ON  5/22/75
  0  15OO ON  5/22/75
  (5)  1500 ON  5/22/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories

              C-13

-------
 706
20
10
      X2400
        2400
       1800
       1800
      I	I
                   CD 2400
y
                                NORTH
                                        2400
                                      1800
                         756
                                        10
                                SOUTH
                                                                     4286
                                   2400
                                  1800
   Initialized on
  0 1700 ON 5/22/75
  (ง) 1700 ON 5/22/75
  (f) 1700 ON 5/22/75
  0 1700 ON 5/22/75
  (5) 1700 ON 5/22/75
  /*\ 17OO ON
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Fox-ward Trajectories

              014

-------
                                  NORTH
   706
                         756
  20
13
  10
                                                                      4286
                 (D2400
                                     X2400
                               2400
                               j	i	I	I	i
                                                     i   t    i
                                          10
                                                                     4236
                                  SOUTH
     Initialized on
    0 1900 ON 5/22/75
    (2) 1900 ON 5/22/75
    (5) 1900 ON 5/22/75
    0 1900 ON 5/22/75
    0 1900 ON 5/22/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories

           C-15

-------
 706
20
10
    X2400
    [D2400
      2400
                2400
                                NORTH
                                               756
                                   2400
                                         I	I
                                        10
                                SOUTH
                                                                    4286
                                                        2400
                                                        1	I	I
                                                                    4236
 Initialized on
0  2100 ON  5/22/75
(ง)  2100 ON  5/22/75
(3)  2100 ON  5/22/75
0  2100 ON  5/22/75
(ง)  2100 ON  5/22/75
^  ftlOO OK  5/22/75
                        ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                               Forward Trajectories

                                        C-16

-------
                                NORTH
 706
20
                                                756
10
 o
                                                                    4286
      2400
   . E2400
      2400
                 2400
                                   2400
2400
                                        10
                                                                   4236
                                SOUTH
 Initialized on
0  2300 ON  5/22/75
(f)  2300 ON  5/22/75
(3)  2300 ON  5/22/75
0  2300 ON  5/22/75
(ง)  2300 ON  5/22/75
fii\  aaoo ON  5/22/7S
                        ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                               Forward Trajectories

                                         C-17

-------
                           FIGURE 2


                  AIR PARCEL TRAJECTORIES FOR
              ST. LOUIS FOR SATURDAY, JULY 26, 1975
                             C-19
88151 It

-------
 706
20
10
                                NORTH
                         756
                                        800
                    4 2400
                            2400
          I	I
                      I   I    I    I    I    I
                                                     '600
                                        10
                                SOUTH
                                                                    4286
                                                        i    i    i
                                                                    4236
   Initialized on
  0 500 ON 7/26/75
  (2) 500 ON 7/26/75
  (3) 500 ON 7/26/75
  0 500 ON 7/26/75
  (ง) 500 ON 7/26/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories


                C-20

-------
                            NORTH
106 711 716  721 726  731  736 741  746 751  756 761  766 771
ซฃฃ
21
20
19
18

17
16
15
14
13

12
11
10
9
w^
8

7
6
5
4
3

2


(
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I
—
- -
—
—
-
-
—
-
~ —
—
Q ~
V
(D 1200
IS) 600

—
-
-
-
-
- —
~ —
-
-
-
_

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1

4321
4316
4311

4306

4301
4296
4291

4286

4281
4276

4271

4266

4261
4256
4251

4246

4241

7*236
 Initialized on
 )  1500 ON  7/26/76
       SOUTH

      Backward Trajectories

ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                                 C-21

-------
                              NORTH
106 711  716 721 726  731 736 741  746 751 756  761 766 771
                                                               - 4321
      I    i     I    I     I     I    I     I     I    I     I     I
                                                  1200 W600
                                   I   I    I    I   I    I    I    I
III
        23456
           7   8  9   10  11  12  13  14  15 16
              SOUTH
 Initialized on
Q  500 ON  7/26/75
(ง)  soo ON  7/26/75
(ง)  500 ON  7/26/75
0  500 ON  7/26/75
(S)  500 ON  7/26/75
ฎ  500 ON  7/26/75
      ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
             Fonrard Trajectories
                                   022

-------
                              NORTH
 ?06 711  716  721  726  731 736  741 746  751 756  761 766 771
21
20
19
18
17

16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 6

 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
       I    I     I    I     I     I
I     I    I     i
                       22400
                                      i    i
                                 1800
                                        1200
X2400
                    42400
                                          120(3
      I    I   I    I
  01234

   Initialized on
  0  700 ON  7/26/75
  (5)  700 ON  7/26/75
  0  700 ON  7/26/75
  0  700 ON  7/26/75
  0  700 ON  7/26/75
  0  700 ON  7/26/75
        7   8   9  10 11  12  13 14  15  16 1
           SOUTH
    ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
          For-wrard Trajectories

                   C-23
                          4321

                          4316

                          4311

                          4306

                          4301

                          4296

                          4291

                          4286

                          4281!
                               I
                          4276

                          4271

                          4266

                          4261

                          4256

                          4251

                          4246

                          4241

                          7*236

-------
ฃ
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
                            NORTH
O6  711 716  721 726  731 736  741 746  751 756  761 766 771
     II!)
T
I    I     I     I
                                               2400
T
 _ 0)2400
                    X2400
                                                        1800
                                                           120C
                               I    I    I   I    I   I
                               4321
                               4316
                               4311
                               4306
                               4301
                               4296
                               4291
                               4286
                               4281!
                                    4
                                    (
                               4276
                               oo
                               4271
                               4266
                               4261
                               4256
                                                               4246
                                                               4241
  01234
  Initialized on
 0  900 ON  7/26/75
 (2)  900 ON  7/26/75
 (3)  900 ON  7/26/75
 0  900 ON  7/26/75
 0  900 ON  7/26/75
 0  900 ON  7/26/75
                                                            	1 4
                  5   6   7  8   9  10  11  12  13  14 15  16  17
                            SOUTH
                     ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                            Forward Trajectories

                                      C-24
                                                                  236

-------
                             NORTH
tt>6 711 716 721 726 731 736 741 746 751 756 761 766 771
21
20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

 9
 8

 7

 6

 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
     I
           1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
1     1    I     I
                                               X24OO
     ฉ2400
                      X2400
                                             2400
                                                          1800
  01234

  Initialized on
 0  1100 ON 7/26/75
 (ง)  1100 ON 7/26/75
 (3)  1100 ON 7/26/75
 0  1100 ON 7/26/75
 (S)  1100 ON 7/26/75
 (D  1100 ON 7/26/75
                      6   7  8   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16 1
                             SOUTH
                     ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                            Forward Trajectories
                                  C-25
                                                4321

                                                4316

                                                4311

                                                4306

                                                4301

                                                4296

                                                4291
                                                             1200
                                                               4286
                                                4281!
                                                     i
                                                4276

                                                4271

                                                4266

                                                4261

                                                4256

                                                4251

                                                4246

                                                4241
                                                7*236

-------
                               NORTH
 toe  711 716  721 726 731  736 741  746 751  756  761 766  771
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 e
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
I     I
I     I    II
                                       (
                                                                - 4321

-------
                              NORTH
206 711  716 721 726 731  736 741  746  751 756 761  766  771
<ฃฃ
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
(
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- -
—
-
—
- -
~ —
; <*-
—
- -
ฉ -
—
ฉ 2400
"
\ 0 "
TS1800
Q ฎ ฎ
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1
4321
4316
4311
4306
4301
4296
4291
4286
4281
4276
4271
4266
4261
4256
4251
4246
4241
^236
 Initialized on
0  1SOO ON 7/26/75
(|)  1500 ON 7/26/75
(5)  1500 ON 7/26/75
0  1500 ON 7/26/75
(5)  1500 ON 7/26/75
(S)  1500 ON 7/26/75
                              SOUTH
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       For-ward Trajectories
                                    C-27

-------
                             NORTH
    711  716 721  726  731 736  741  746 751 756  761 766 771
<& 2400 x 2400 A 2400 __
\> V \
\ \ \
V V ฉ V^ฎ
^•wtsoo ^^-Tisoo ^-ifiaoo
i i i t w i i i i i i i i i i i i
3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1
SOUTH
4321
4316
4311
4306
4301
4296
4291
4286
4281
4276
4271
4266
4261
4256
4251
4246
.4241
^236
 Initialized on
0  1700 ON 7/26/75
(ง)  1700 ON 7/26/7S
(5)  1700 ON 7/26/75
0  1700 ON 7/26/75
(6)  1700 ON 7/26/75
(5)  1700 ON 7/26/75
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories

                C-28

-------
                              NORTH
    711  716 721  726  731 736 741  746 751 756  761  766 771
•ฃฃ
21
20
19
16
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ฐ<
I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I
_ —
~ —
—
X 2400
-
y
012400
-
v
\D -

-------
                           FIGURE 3


                  AIR PARCEL TRAJECTORIES FOR

               ST. LOUIS FOR TUESDAY, JULY 13, 1976
                                C-31
88151 11

-------
                               NORTH
 706
                        756
20
10
                                                                  4286
  0
                10
                                                                   4236
                               SOUTH
   Initialized on
  0 500 ON 7/13/76
  (S) 500 ON 7/13/76
  (5) 500 ON 7/13/76
  0 500 ON 7/13/76
  (S) 500 ON 7/13/76
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories


                C-32

-------
                            NORTH
106 711 716  721  726 731  736 741 746  751 756  761 766 771
iSS
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
(
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
- —
~ —
-
—
- -
X~
-
-
_
600
—
—
- -
—
—
1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1
SOUTH
Initialized on
4321
4316
4311
4306
4301
4296
4291
4286
4281
4276
4271
4266
4261
4256
4251
4246
4241
^236
    1600 ON  7/13/76           Backward Trajectories

                    ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                                   C-33

-------
                             NORTH
206 711  716 721  726  731 736  741 746 751  756 761  766  771
     i     i     i    i     i     i             i     i     i    i     i
     I   I    i ~ i   I    I    I    I   I  ~ i    i   I    i    i ~ i    I
 0
2345
 Initialized on
0  500 ON  7/13/76
(f)  500 ON  7/13/76
(5)  500 ON  7/13/76
0  SOO ON  7/13/76
(6)  500 ON  7/13/76
(?)  500 ON  7/13/76
7   8  9   10 11  12  13  14 15  16
   SOUTH
              ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                    Forward Trajectories

                            C-34

-------
                              NORTH
 106 711  716 721  726 731  736 741  746 751  756 761  766 771
21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

 9

 8

 7

 6

 5

 4

 3

 2

 1
- Q 1200
I
I
I
I
I
                                                  I
                                                        I
I
               4321

               4316

               4311

               4306

               4301

               4296

               4291

               4286

               4281!
                    i
               4276

               4271

               4266

               4261

               4256

               4251

               4246

               4241
  01234

  Initialized on
 0  700 ON 7/13/76
 (ง)  700 ON 7/13/76
 (3)  700 ON 7/13/76
 0  700 ON 7/13/76
 (5)  700 ON 7/13/76
 (ซ)  700 ON 7/13/76
                     6   7  8   9  10  11  12  13 14  15  16
                           SOUTH
                    ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                          Fonrard Trajectories

                                   C-35
              #23
                                                                   6

-------
                                NORTH
   ฃ06 711  716 721  726  731 736 741  746  751 756  761 766  771
13
21-
20-
19-
18-
17-
16-
15-
14-
13-
12-
11-
10-
 9-
 8-
 7-
 6-
 5-
 4-
 3-
 2-
 1-
         I    I     II     I    I     I    \     I    I     I     I    r
                     2400
              1800
              1200
                                          2400
 1800
1200
                                                          1200
      I    I
                      I    I    I   I    I
         1    1   I    I v I    I
     Initialized on
    0 9OO ON  7/13/76
    (ง) 900 ON  7/13/76
    (3) 900 ON  7/13/76
    0 900 ON  7/13/76
    (ง) 900 ON  7/13/76
    (?) 900 ON  7/13/76
                          6   7  8   9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16
                                SOUTH
                       ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSE
                             Forward Trajectories

                                      C-36
4321

4316

4311

4306

4301

4296

4291

4286

4281!
     i
4276

4271

4266

4261

4256

4251

4246

4241

7*236

-------
                               NORTH
 106  711 716  721 726 731  736 741  746  751 756 761  766 771
21
20
19
18
17

16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
       I     1    I     I    I     I     I    I     I     T    I     I     I
I    I
                   2400
                                  2400
                                 1800
                                                   180C
         1200             J
I    I   II    I    I   I    I
                                                  1200
                                                          18)'
                                                         L20C
                                                         180
                                                          I    I
                                                                  4321
                                                            4316
                                                            4286
                                                            4281!
                                     }4266
                                                            4261
                                                            4246
                                                            4241
  01234

  Initialized on
 0  1100 ON  7/13/76
 (f)  1100 ON  7/13/76
 (5)  1100 ON  7/13/76
 0  1100 ON  7/13/76
 (6)  1100 ON  7/13/76
 (e)  1100 ON  7/13/76
               5  6   7   8  9   10 11  12  13  14 15  16  1
                         SOUTH
                 ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                        Fonrard. Trajectories

                                C-37
                                     7*236

-------
                            NORTH
ฃ06 711 716  721 726  731 736  741 746  751 756  761 766  771
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
i
           r
              ii    I     i    IT    IIIFI
                                                           640 >
                         2400
                                       2400
                                      1600
                   I   I    I    I   I
                                          I   I    I   II   I
                                                              4321

                                                              4316

                                                              4311

                                                              4306

                                                              4301

                                                              4296

                                                              4291

                                                              4286

                                                              4281!
 Initialized on
0  1300 ON 7/13/76
(|)  1300 ON 7/13/76
0  1300 ON 7/13/76
0  1300 ON 7/13/76
0  1300 ON 7/13/76
0  1300 ON 7/13/76
                          7  8   9  10  11  12  13 14  15  16
                             SOUTH
                      ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                             Forward Trajectories
                                   C-38
                                                         4276

                                                         4271

                                                         4266

                                                         4261

                                                         4256

                                                         4251

                                                         4246

                                                         4241

                                                          236

-------
                              NORTH
 t06 711  716 721  726 731  736  741 746  751 756  761 766  771
21
20
19
16
17

16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 6
 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
      T
T
T    I     I    1     I    I     I    I     I    I
               2400
                              2400
                        I    I   I    I
                             1800
                               I	I
                                     I   I
                                             4321

                                             4316

                                             4311

                                             4306

                                             4301

                                             4296

                                             4291

                                             4266

                                             428 li
                                            BOO   |
                                             4276

                                            yd1271
                                             4266

                                             4261

                                             4256

                                             4251

                                             4246

                                             4241
  Initialized on
 0  1500 ON 7/13/76
 (ง)  1500 ON 7/13/76
 (5)  1500 ON 7/13/76
 0  1500 ON 7/13/76
 (6)  1500 ON 7/13/76
 (S)  1500 ON 7/13/76
                    5   6  7   6  9   10 11  12  13  14  15  16
                              SOUTH
            ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                  Forward Trajectories

                          C-39
                                                    V
                                                                  236

-------
                             NORTH
lOe 711 716 721  726 731  736 741  746 751  756 761  766 771
21
20
19
13
17

16
15
14
13
12
11
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 2
 1
     1     I    1     1    1     1
                                  1
I     1    I     I    I     I
     i   i    i
                                       3400
                                                            18C
                                                             u
                   i    1   1    1
                                      1800
                                       I   1    1   1    II
                                                               4321
                                                               4316
                          4306

                          4301

                          4296

                          4291
                          0
                          4286

                          42811
                               i
                          4276
                          .00
                          4271
               4   5  6  7   8  9   10 11  12 13  14  15 16
                             SOUTH
                                                                1236
 Initialized on
0  1700 ON 7/13/76
ฎ  1700 ON 7/13/76
(5)  1700 ON 7/13/76
0  1700 ON 7/13/76
(6)  1700 ON 7/13/76
(5)  1700 ON 7/13/76
                       ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
                             Forward Trajectories

                                    C-40

-------
                              NORTH
&
21
20
19
ia
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ฐ<
)6 711 716 721 726 731 736 741 746 751 756 761 766 771
I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1
- -
—
- r
/ -
_ ซ••
1 F2'
- 1
i
I "
1 -
-
J) 2400 X 2400 * 2AOQ
' / I li-
'- -
1 1 1
(y ฉ ฉ
1 1 II 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 ls^l 1
) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1
4321
4316
4311
44806
4301
4296
00
4291
4286
4281
4276
4271
4266
4261
4256
4251
4246
4241
7*236
 Initialized on
0  1900 ON  7/13/76
(D  1900 ON  7/13/76
(3)  1SOO ON  7/13/76
0  1900 ON  7/13/76
(?)  1900 ON  7/13/76
(5)  1900 ON  7/13/76
                              SOUTH
ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OZONE ANALYSIS
       Forward Trajectories

               C-41

-------
                            Appendix D

        ISOPLETHS OF HOURLY OZONE CONCENTRATIONS (PPHM)
        AND HOURLY OZONE CONCENTRATION DIFFERENCES (PPB)
        BETWEEN SCENARIOS FOR THE NEW YORK APPLICATION OF
            THE UAM ON THE AFTERNOON OF 8 AUGUST 1980
            FIGURE D-h Scenario 1
            FIGURE D-2: Scenario 2
            FIGURE D-3: Differences between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2
            FIGURE D-4: Scenario 3
            FIGURE D-3: Differences between Scenario 2 and Scenario 3
            FIGURE D-6: Scenario 4
            FIGURE D-7: Differences between Scenario 4 and Scenario 1
88151 Ap

-------
00

9
2
                         888S
                                           8
8
   I   ?
a
 s:ง
5 2
   o
   o
   O
   o
   K)
   a>
            I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I  | I I I I I t i | I I i | I I I |
                                                                 o
                                                                 cs
                                                                   ง
•~ i  i  i i  i  i  i  i  i i  i  i  i  i  i i jj! r
                                                       \  i
                                  1S3M
                                                                  o
                                                                  GO
                                                                  cn
•<ป•
•^
in


II


I  5

>ฐl



If
X  • =
o  .ฃ
         i
         
-------
                                      XiTJ
           -t 1 I I I ! I f I I I I I i I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I i 1 i I I I I I f
               t i  i  I  t  i i  i  i  i  i   i  t  1  i  ฃ i*  i  F11  i  i  i
•*

10
         o
         
    ฃ
R

?
o
CM
IV

I
O
s
o
s
o
ป
o
CM
'P'i- t'>->'^
                                      1S3M
                                                                                                  cc
                                                                                                  CD

-------
                  4.3 TJ
i I I I I I j I I I I i I I | I i I ) I I t I I I I | I 1 ! | I I I | I I
                  ism
                  ISV3
11 I 11 t {i i 11 i 11 I 11 i 11 t 11 11 i 11 i i | i
                  1S3M
                                                    .2
                                                    M
                                                    g
                                                    g
                                                    •H
                                                    s
                                                    8
                                                    u
                                                    .-I
                                                    i
                                                    S
                                                              oo
                                                              CO
           D-2

-------
             i I i i i g i i i j i ! i 1 i i i f i i  i I f i  i i i i i i i i i i i i i

                            ^
                                 1S3M
                                 1SV3
o
o>  ซ
•f  q
*~  -^
II
o

-------
                   1S3M
                   1SV3
I I [ I 1 I j t I I I I I t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I M t  Q
                   1S3M
                                                                 CO
                                                                 CO
           D-4

-------
                   13TJ
      ?O    Q   O   O   O   O    O
      CM    O   03   
-------
o
*~ 9
^ i
ii H
| J
> >
| ฃ
i 1
o ^
2 5






z
f



O
O
1

o
2

o>
P



<
d

0
 *
— • \ vi
-
—
— 'ซ \
••• *> *
— ', \
\ 1

-
_
-
-
_
~
~
~ ! 1 1 1 f t 1 1 1 i 1 1 I I i 1 1 ! 1 t ! i i
0 0
CM ซ-
<
ซ

-
_
-
-
"
_

**
-
M*



"•
-
_

—
..
—
—

—
'*'

-
—
|
c

i
u
r
%








s









o








3

                                                   :   ^
in
                         1S3M
                                                             o
                                                             00
                                                             2
                                                             <
                                                             00
                                                              •h
                                                             CN

                                                             -2







o
fv. (N
O 1
11 n
ง 0)
3 "o
^
ii
t F
.^ L.
o .5
2 s




I
^~
1

L
O
0
2
1

8
(N
u>
E
\=

a
CM
in





d
d
^
O
O

+
^
o
CM

o
o

o
s
o
ID
o
*•
o
CM
(D


O
0}
in
o
in

1
o
CM
~ ! 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 i 1 1 I I 1 f 1 ! 1 t ! i i i
O O C
CM ซ-
1S3M


1SV3
?ogoooogoe
CMOO>UJ
" / / \ \ HO
r ( •' ,. '-A 4 < vO
— * * \ "*"
_ c>. j i —
: ^b. ''•--'"' ' , 3
!T ^ N \ -.
- "i v\ ' \ *"
"* Vs ^ V> —
•* Vx^*' ' — i
r \\ 5
i ' ~
\s fi ~"
^
wป ^
M. -*
- -
^ '
— *
~r t t i 1 t i i t i t iii$ t i i t t i i r ซ"
o O
3 -H
U
C
8
CO
G
3 $
h ' fi
*" ซ
o -2
8
ง
^
CD
IH
M-l
•H
T)
C
o
r-% T-l
8 -D
(0
s
f S
D g
8 ง

i
0 N
0

•
^
i
tyj
P
H
0 fa
                                                                             CO
                                                                             oo
                  D-6

-------
O 
1 ฐ
IE
2 3
J E
s:s
S 2




I

z



ง
1
8
U")
^~

Q>
F


<
<

1

S
O
CM

O
0
o
s
o
?CMOงง*CMOซJ<
3ป op
^ (si
•"  I

"  II
J!
x •=
1 1
S    $    R   8   S   S
O    Q
CM    O
o

"
"•
3.
-
•H
"*'.
""ri it 1 i -*l'i r i t t i iปi i* i i t \ i
1 M^
•ป*
—
-
^.

•™
ซ™
-
**
I
•~*

•*•
--
*•*•
-r
-
ซ
*
i i
                                                            ง
       m
                               1S3M  .
                                                                o
                                                                oo
                                                                4J

                                                                 CO
                                                                00
                                                                (N


                                                                .2
                                                                 o
                                                                 w

                                                                 'H
                                                                 (0
                                                                .3
                                                                 8
                                                                 en
         Jl


         8
         s
         0)
         •H
         T3


         ง
         •H
         4J
         (0

         iJ
         8

         1
                                                                m

                                                                i
                                                                 fr.
                                                                                 CO

                                                                                 03
                       D-7

-------
10 *
tO _j
ซ~ 1
11 II
Is
> •ฃ
II
o c
2 5




f

ง
i



O
o
00

1

8
ix
*~


p

o






8


ฃ
3
_?

O
00

-------
CT>

^  m
in  o
ง

-------
        4.C3TJ
        JLS3AA
                                                   *
                                                  o
                                                  oo
        1SV3
       1S3M
                                                            CO

                                                            CO
D-tn

-------
       -LiVJ
       1S3M
       1SV3
                      8   8   ง
       1S3M
                                              O
                                              00
un
T—I


oo
D-ll

-------
3?
I  5

>I



If
X • =
o .E
2 2
*
                    ซ•    •+•
                                    •*•    •ซ•

  O
  O
  K)
         -t  I  I  I  I  1  I  I  I  t  I  1  t  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I t
                  o
                  N
                                1S3M
                                1SV3
                  +    •**•    +    *    +    *    +    *
1, „ I
3 ป
-i -2 0
-P o •+
^ ^^
23 CSI
1 .i
o .E o
22 0
fN
O
8

o
ll
0

-------
  O
   I
I  s
If
X • =
o .S
2 2
   I
  in
       *   ?
                 O
                 CM
                     O    CO   ป
                     0
                          in
                              in
                                        CM
                                        in
                                      3    8
                                      5    $
o
CO
  I   I
O
03
m

o

-------
   o
   I
It
 z:s
2  2
   O
   o
   00
   o
   o
   (V
        i
        
-------
o?
J!
 x  •=
 o  .5
5  2
   o
   o
   o
       in
                                                     8
   "   S
       p -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 I i I I
         -1  I  I  I  I  I  <  I  I  I  I  I  I  I I I I I
                                                I  I I
                                                              ฃ

                                                              ง
   S(NI

 .  X
I?
IE
 X • =
 a .E
2 2
                                1S3M
                                1SVG
        ง
                                                     ง    g
        ir>inir>in    +    -*-
        ********^-**
   o
   o
   en
   O
   O
   00
   0)



   1=
            I | II I | I I I | I 1 I [ I I I I J I I ] I M J I II J I I t  | t I
                                              
-------
                                   X3TJ
K)

ซ> 10
in o
S88S8SS8
 i j 11 i
                                "              a .   o •      _
          ~ i  (  i  i  I  i  i  l  l l  l  l  iiliฃtii"ttii
•D
         s
                                   1S3M
                                   iSVG
     ?o    o    o    o    o    o    o
     (M    o    00    ป    *    N    O
     ?
-------
                    JLSTJ
I  I  I  I  I  1 I i I !  I  i  t  i  1  1
                    1S3M
                                                         o
                                                         00
                                                         
-------
                    J.STJ
           8    ง    S    3
 ซซซซ
I I I I I t I I I i i ! I I I I I I I I ! 1 1 I t I I I I j I I I I I I I
tii iiii i i  i t i i 1 t S i t K11 i  i i
                   1S3M
                                                            a
                                                           O
                                                           CO
                                                           o>
                   1SV3
  i i i { i i i | i i t | t i i } i t t | i i i | i i i | i t i g i i t
  i  ป I i  ป i  i  i: i :r i" i  \ i  S i* ป r i i
                                                           <
                                                           00
                                                           .3
                                                           I
                                                           -p
                                                           ง
                                                           8
                                                           8
                                                           Q)

                                                           O
                                                           O
                                                           VD
                                                           EM
                   1S3M
                                                                        00
                                                                        03
             D-18

-------
     J.3TJ

| E
JE3
s:ง
2 2





I
g



o
O
^
1
o

K)
^"

I
pt






Is*
o ฐ"
•- i
it
" ll
imum Value
mum Value
X •=
o .ฃ
2 2





I
|


O
o
rO
1
Q
O
r-

a>

P
S
<
1
O
•*
fv
o
CM
ง
rv

o
g
o

M
•^
-
-
••
-1 1 1





g 9
?^
^
-4 I 1 | I
— •
r
ZL
^
nr
MH
^
I.
i**
-
•ป
pปP*
1
I
*"*"
I
**v
***^"
MW
*ป
ooooooooc
cN<5ooi ' —
v> \ \ \
x- " ' \ *"
'\ N-*; ;
w>
ป i.
o -
CS) —
\ I
*•
^

^
ซ*
_
-
—
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 f 1 I I I I i t I 1 I ™
O 0 <
1S3M


iSVG
oggg^oooj
ซtT)mirt*'

t r 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ) 1 1 i
O
^. ^
/•x /""N.\ <;i$
•• / ,-"xA\ pro
ฐ • / ,-, \\\ ^0
1 O ; ]'' \ \V\ "
i O i \ '. ',_^
\ ' *~O • ป \
Vv1's S\ ' 'i
'V1-'1- \\
i \ —
^s x i *
\j :
-P
-*
•**



-*
^
f
^

•

•a,
&
*****
0
00
o
0 ^
N +J
ง
Frt
j a
ง co
*.
T

O
0 -H
ง
U
CO

^"J
c
,_(

o •ง
s ^
ง
w
c:
ซ
a 3
t S
•^ J-J
O Q)
in u
M
(U
4-1
m
•H
t3
ง
•H
rt -P
CM "5
il
ง
5 B
ง ง
3J
C
8
o 0
•
m
r-
i
H
5
t5
M
                                      b
     IS3M
                                                       co
                                                       co
D-19

-------
      J.SFJ
„. ro
oo m
i— -
" H
0> Q,
3 -*
| E
IE3
x •=
o .5
2 2







I
|




Q
0
(O
1

o
o
m

0)
E
i-





O> r-
^ *
II
" II
3 ป
_r _2
| E
H
o ^
2 2



NORTH



Q
O
in
i
o
o
*

0>
E
<
i

O
s

o
o
tv
O
0


o
oo
ID
o
*> ^ \
m> O' \
^ C^ ^'
>^ ^
™ \ \ *
I.
^
ซ*hv
w
^
r
'
^^
IV>.
^
M*
•ป
งe
(
} ;
^ '
It j 11^


-
~


ป


^



~
-
•
—

—

—


^

~

-
—
i i i
c



03 <
* '
i i | 1 I 1
~ "
*•
-
••
"•
^

•

—
-
—

*•

*.

-
M

•<*
"*
>

R


•



O
CO

S nH
vN
4J
JQ
S D^
3
s ^
CO

^
"O-

o O
- -H
fo
^
O
rj
CO
T3
ง
M
o O
-H

ง
C
5 jy
: ^
^
10 Q)

C
^
•H
''O

c
o
8 3
(0
, i
5 y
8 ง

QJ

>?
2 g

f9
i

B
e
      1S3M
                                                      oo
                                                      CO
D-20

-------
       -LSTJ
00
0 ฃ
rg |
ป II
0) ai
3 -j
> >
| E
.!ง
S'J
2 2





f

O




O
o
00
^-
I
8
r^
^""

Q>
ฃ







(O
(N 00

ป II
_ D
-ฐ "5
-* >
c ^
| |
o .ฃ
2 2




ฃ
|



o
O
f-
1
8
5
<

o
inm>n<

-i t i i { i i i t i t i t t i i t i i i \ t i i i i i i i i i t t i i i i
r u

" Z2
~ i "SiS
"" | C )
r  ' ^
" . \
IT '• '
^^ *"
_
•••
-
™
^
"
"
^
_ซ,
—
r
~ ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 ป I 1 i ป t 1 1 1 1 1
O O
CM >-
1S3M


1SV3
g?S8SS?S8S
????$$!5!5I5!$
-1 1 I | M I | t 1 1 | ! I f | I ! ! j f 1 1 J 1 I I | t 1 I J 1 M | I
"• Vx^ f' r^^"
"B- "-' ^_^F

-------
00
Is; fsj
"~ |
11 II

8 a)
.3 3
> ฐ
1]
1 'i






I
8
2



0
o
0
(N
1

8
o>
^

E
P







(0
9 ^
C\l 1
11 II
cimum Value
imum Value
o .5
2 5




I
Z


o
o
1
o
o
00

E
P


<
ซ
>

o

in
Q
CO
m
o
^
o
CM
in





iouiiDu')*'<

-1 t 1 | 1 I I | 1 t t | 1 M | f 1 1 | 1 I 1 | t 1 I | 1 t 1 | 1 i 1 | ! 1 1
— " # ^ ""
r 1 i
r  (1)
1
i!
U-l
M-i
•H
T3

C
O
8 3
(0
U
ฃ ง
o
^ 8

8
o
2 g

•
p.*.
i

ง
Q
E
>
      1S3M
D-22
                                                   03
                                                   CO

-------
                             Appendix E
         ISOPLETHS OF HOURLY OZONE CONCENTRATIONS (PPHM)
        AND HOURLY OZONE CONCENTRATION DIFFERENCES (PPB)
      BETWEEN SCENARIOS FOR THE ST. LOUIS APPLICATION OF THE
               UAM ON THE AFTERNOON OF 13 JULY 1976
            FIGURE E-l:
            FIGURE E-2:
            FIGURE E-3:
            FIGURE E-4:
            FIGURE E-5:
            FIGURE E-6:
            FIGURE E-7:
            FIGURE E-8:
            FIGURE E-9:
            FIGURE E-10:
            FIGURE E-l 1:
            FIGURE E-12:
            FIGURE E-13:
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Differences between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2
Scenario 5
Scenario 6
Differences between Scenario 2 and Scenario 5
Differences between Scenario 2 and Scenario 6
Scenario 7
Differences between Scenario 1 and Scenario 8
SIP Scenario A
SIP Scenario B
Differences between Scenario 1 and SIP Scenario A
Differences between Scenario 1 and SIP Scenario B
88151 Ap

-------
to
                                 1SV3
3 "
II
x •=
D .E
2 2
  o
  o
                                                               !


I!
X •=
o .E
  I/)'

  O
  O

  O
  0>


  p
                                            i   i   f
ซ>

I
         8
         CO


         I
         -p
         8



         ง




         •
         (0
        !~H

        w
                                                                       H
         t   I  i   t . i . . > . i  i  t  t   i
                                               t  i   t  >   t  t
                                 1S3M
                                   E-l
                                                                                  CO

                                                                                  00

-------
                                       1SV3
  IN

•* CT1
              

                                                                                          CD

-------
                                         1SV3
                                             T  r
                                                                              l

IS
  in-
  o

  o
  o
  33
  O
  O

<7I


 I
           t	I
                                 i   I   i   i   i  i   i   i   i   t
                                         1S3M
                                                                                VD
                                                                                r~
                                                                                
-------
<  CM

IN CM
                                        1SV3
                                                             ID


                                                             I
                                                i    i    r
                                                               i    T   r
II

gc
2 5
  o
  o
                                                                              ง
      21
       i
 I   i   t   i   i   i   i   i   i   i   I   i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i
              o
              CM
                                       1S3M
                                                                                      rH


                                                                                       >i
                                                                                      rH
      0>[

      T
J	!	I	}   I   I	1	I	I   1   i	I	t   I   I   i	t  t  I
                                                                                      CO
00
                                        1SV3
ซ O

   "
J  8
II
  tn •
  o
  o
  o
  o
  o
  CM

                                                                         CN

                                                                         .a
                                                                         .1
                                                                         -M
                                                                         $
                                                                          0)

                                                                          B

                                                                          8


                                                                          ง
                                                                          N
                                                                         O
                                        1S3M
                                                                                                   CO

                                                                                                   oo
                                        E-4

-------
If)

N oa
<* oq

"" in
II
                                                1SV3
   u
   o
   o
   ID

   E
   !=
                     I    I     I    |    I     I    I     )    I    I     I    |    I     I    I
                o
                CM
                                I   I   I    I   I   t    I   I   I    t    I   I    I   t   1
                                                1S3M
                                                                                                         cr>
                                                                                                         r-\


                                                                                                          >1
                                                1SV3
ป             S

         <    I    i  -r
   (/I •
   O

   o
   o
   in
   o
   o
IT    [    1
                                                                     O
                                                                                          
-------
a)
2
o


E
3

"x
o
  10 •
  O

  O
  O
  03
  O
  O
           i   I   I
              o
              CM
                                                                          ii   >   i   i
                                        1S3M
                                                                                                 CO

                                                                                                 CD
                                          E-6

-------
1SV3
0 ^
Moximum Value =
Minimum Value =
1 41
X
O
o
0
i *~
8
'V o^ ,.. ,, 	 Q".-'----". :;;;;::-'' *
-
o o <
CM ซ-
1S3M
1SV3
<
W * CM *
| 1 1 I | i 1 1 ] 1 t 1 | 1 i i
- •'" 	 	 . _2 CK N -
..- 	 	 	 ---• -30- -. ';.
S ,-"""" ,_. • \ *•. N* v
ฐ '-"...-•' / : v •--4.0'_..-- ...> ; *
	 --' * 	 ,',- — \v
\\ \\i\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
8 ^

01
rH
O rH
=> f>
O_|

CN
O
•H
ง
CO
rH
ซ n
u(
ce between Scenaric
10
:entration differen
ฃ c
i 8
&
8
o

(0
n
i
H
>
1S3M
E-7
                                                            CD
                                                            CO

-------
1SV3
to
in csi
2?
H I,
-" * _
>l *
E E
II
s:?
2 2

CM
i
_0
- .^ \
— ^~-' "•-.. 	 -' _
^
^
-
uป
1 i 1 I 1 1 I I 1 t I 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
o o c
1S3M

1SV3
0
•* * * *
ป * CM *
I ( 1 t 1 [ i 1 t | I 1 | ] 1 I )
-.
^ ' N'-.
~
— 	 	 ., " -x /'.••x-'vPj/X /"'•?/ —
f -*' ^ '"'' /e\/'*\*> ?**'•''' \ '^ i
- j C'~\::^''3'i !'-:'^::
-------
 1SV3
rO in
3;
" H
J s -
5 o ?
> >
1 ง
1 I
S 'E
2 2

ซ—
CM
ฃ
sl
v )
o

o
o
 \ \
* t'~ ' \ ', ** '
v--/;.ฐr""> / -'' /
wc* * ^ .---
^-C ---:::: ^

~
^

-
-
~


i i i i i i i i i i i t i t i i i t i i
o o <
CM *-
1S3M

1SV3
d
*•**
ป •* CM *
| 1 1 I | I 1 1 j 1 1 t | 1 I t
-
	 \
'x,
• o> "•--.,
"x -----o-i-...
\
\ 'v
*•-'•'' * ^
...-;.. -/.jflo ,N ,''".,\\ -
ฐ.(\ * '•).' ',- : • \
' - ' [-4 ซ - ' \ ' • i' ' ••
^ >--.-'' / /

" 	 ",,-% N....--'0^-:;'' ...
" * — ''
ป
•-

ซ*


^
i i i t ป t t it i 1 i i i 11 ti t t
S 2 e
1S3M



e
l

•
"1
^**
VD
r~
CTi
i~H
>,
0 ,H
— 3
5 ^
3 ro
8 ^

CN

.2
&
8
m
w J

f3
rH
^^ ^
=ฐ -S
^

W
C
j J8
0)
a!
•S
iw
•^
g
•H
4J
2
1
2 ง
ฃ 8
i ง
ซ
ง
8
O
<_>
ro
1
W
. _
g
R
0 S
5ฐ fa



















































i — i
u~>
CO
00
E-9

-------
00

"> ro
r i CN

*" (O

11
   f
  o
  o
   to
   E

-------
                                     1SV3
  03
"J   -
Ji
s:?
2 2
      CM
    I
  (ft •
  o
  o
  o
  o
  o
                    I   I   I   I    I
              r\
   I   '
i    r
             O
             CM
                               •O


                                I

                                     1S3M
5
3  oj

I |   ^
ฃ  E

I  E
  1/1 '
  O
  o
  O
  O
                                     1SV3
                                                                      
-------
 II
   II
 5  o>


M



II
 SI
2  2
   o
   o
   1C
j	I
                                              1SV3
                        I	I
                                  I    l   I
                                                    CM
                                                                                       W


                                                                                       7
                                                                 t    I    i    i    r
                                                                                           I
                                                                                           ง
                                                        i   i    t   t   r   i
                                                                                j	i
                                              1S3M
I
 s
2
   CJ



   o
   o
   o
   •ฃ>
                
                                                                                          O
                                                                                          c
                                                                                          OJ
                                                                                          u
                                                                                         I/!

                                                                                          C
                                                                                          C
                                                                                          r
                                                                                          
-------
                                         1SV3
T 10
rj CM
IS
S :E
2 2
              
                                                                                        JX



                                                                                        ~>
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         c
                                                                                         0)
                                                                                         u
                                                                                        00
                                                                          0


                                                                           (D
                                                                           C

                                                                           o
                                                                           r j
(0
in

pi
                                        1S3M
                                         E-13
                                                                                        H

                                                                                        En
                                                                                                       00

                                                                                                       00

-------
•t  CO
-f  5   _
ii
S.E
S  2
  in-
  o

  o
  o
  to
   o
   o
   ID
                                            1SV3
                                        I    I    I    II
           J	I	I	I	1	I	I	1	I	I	I	I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I
               O
               CM
                                           1S3M
r i

t
-t
                                            1SV3
               (0
                                                                       (O

                                                                       7
IE

.i  E
SI
S  2
   O
   o
   \fj
   a
   o
'    I
'  ^    I
•    r
                                                             I    I   T	T
                                                               O
 i   i   i   i   i

    O
    tsl
                                t    i   i   i
                                                 I   i   i   t
                                                                  i   i   i   i   i
                                                                                               C
                                                                                               f-

                                                                                               CL.
                                                                       OJ
                                                                                    g

                                                                                    ^.
                                                                                    O


                                                                                    V
                                                                                    U
                                                                                    'Jl


                                                                                    C
                                                                                               0>
                                                                                    a;
                                                                                    c
                                                                                    o
                                                                                               W
                                            1S3M
                                         E-14
                                                                                                            ao
                                                                                                            CO

-------
                                          1SV3
•  0
r-} •*
II
S :?
2 2
  o
  o
  00
                >

i  E

I  I
x  •=
2 2
  O
  O
  o
                                                           1   T
              o
              CM
                     I   I   i    t   i   I   i   t   I   i   I   i   I
                                         1S3M
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  I/I
                                                                                           jx

                                                                                           3
                                                                               _g

                                                                                L_

                                                                                C


                                                                                0!

                                                                                U

                                                                               00
                                                                                r

                                                                                (U

                                                                                r

                                                                                0
                                                                                o;
                                                                                r
                                                                                5
                                                                                           U
                                                                                           in
                                                                                r-^

                                                                                6
                                                                                H
                                                                                Cn
                                                                                                          oo
                                                                                                          03
                                      E-15

-------
  1SV3
2? S $ S . 7
11 ii
3 1>
-2 3
ฐ 0 *
> >
ii
s:i
2 S
^
W
ฃ

C/)
o
o
o
! *
| E
11
X •=
o .E
2 2


^
CM
X
h— V
(/^
o
o
o
rO
r-
, v"
1
O
o
rsj

0)
E
i—
Ol
i I 1 t I | 1 i 1 | 1 1 t | I 1 1
•ป

•*• ""
^^ "™
-
_

-

***" '^™
-
^

r+


M-

"*
kn
*
•ป
i 1 i { i r f i i i 1 t i i t f i i i \ i
c
u
M
Q)
M-l
M-l
.,_)
T3
g
•H
4J
(0
t!
O C
*™ d)
I i
S
o
N
O
•
(t)
vo
1
w
w
g
H
ซ*•ป t-1
1 O O O
CM •-
  1S3M
                                                           CO
                                                           CO
E-16

-------
   1SV3
to ^- ... ;:
So s $ a
ii
" H
* 0>
3 -.
| E
.i 1
x •?
o .ฑ
2 2

CM
J
CJ

O
o
<ฃ>
1 "-
8
ฃ
111
J
l~
o>
i I i i i I i i t | i i i I i i i
B
^
_ ^
_
..
_^




-
C "^)
^^.^ ^s ~

~
—
_
-
**
~

i 1 i i i i t i i t t 1 i i i i i i i i i



^N
•a
^Q.

^D
p^.
CTi
rH
O iH

^ ro
*"
in

.2
S
8
CO
"S
(0
CN
ซ r>
1 O O O -H
CM ซ- J_]
1S3W g
-P
•I-SV3 flj
eป *
ง2 s * a * T a)
ป H
ง 

1 1
11

,_
X
in z
o
o
o
i *~
8
^

Q)
E
91
1
i 1 i i i 1 i i i 1 i t t 1 i i i

*pป ^ซi

.
-
-


O :
^
-.
A ""

^
^
! f J t I r t I i 1 I 1 I i I i i i i i I
P 0 <
g

-------
    1SV3
00 „.
ฃ* o . . Jฃ
6 0 ซ ? ซN ซ• |
II n
S t
_ _r _
ll *
SI
2 2
_
X "
^
o

0
o
l *
ii
E c
"x •=
2 2

N

J
ง
!/i 2
u
O
O
r-
i *"
g
^

V
E
i
i i i i i i i i i i i t i i i i t

•" ~
-
—

-
~ ' —
^ *ซ^
i
—
r~~\
„ V * j>
^- — -^ ป

pi*

_ -
-

' .~
_
•ป
r 1 i i t i ii t i i ] i i i ii it i i
0 0 <
ง
o;
M-l
M-l
"•d
c
o
^
nl
o c
O
ฃ c
8 8
in
C

M
O

0
1
w
H
P
o t.
1S3M




















































rt
JO
CO
co
E-18

-------
    1SV3
I/) ^
ซ ^-

II H
^ V
— 3 _
>ฐl *
Jf
X •=
o .5
2 2
_
CM
I
j_|
O
o
0

"
1
o
o
IK
J
Ol
1


(N
<0 -t
f\J

11 II
- QJ
H '
II
X •=
o .5
2 2

CM
t*-
Qฃ
ฃZ
(J
0
Q

1-
1 *~
8
tN
^

V
E
Ol
i

ซ
W ? CM *

1 | 1 1 1 [ 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 | I I 1
™

^" ^
I

™


,
^. 	 	 —
/---..- '0.5 	 --' 	 •'.-, /'
i 	 •" •---',''
'' " ป*"
™ *-, ^ *~~ 	 *'
^


*
-
*
i 1 i I i t i i I t i 1 I t < i i I i i i
0 O <
CM ป-
1S3M
1SV3
<


VD

O
•H
1
W
T3
3
CN
O /"s
3ฐ .3
1-1
I
1

g
VJ
^1
0)
4-1
•H
C
.2
-p
(0
8 1
E 8
f- C
D 0
8 8
ง
N
O

(C
f"^
1
w

i
H
^* r*Tj
>

    1S3M
                                                            CO
                                                            co
E-19

-------
1SV3
(O
0 0
to
d 7
:imum Value =
mum Value = -
41
5 E
2 2

CM
I
K
ฃ*
O
O
o

1




o r
(O
o T
11 H
S •ป
M *
If
X • =
o .E
3 2


^
CM
X.
J
o
o
o
in
^
i

o
o
•*

111
E
~f
at
^
I




ซ
* ^ * *


•
1
5
\D
f^.
cn
H
s
3
i ^
o m
8 ^
vo

.2
C/}
"p
(3
CN
Q O
> .8
c
0
c
5
> ^J
1 8
^
rtl
vu
IM

CO
E-20

-------
 1SV3
in *
2 o ป $ N * 7
II n
3 ปป
>ฐI *
][
s:i
2 2
„
N
E
*S
o

o
o
00
1 *~
r-

Q>
.E
*~
^
i | i i i | i t i [ i t i | i i i
~
ซ —
_
—


^v ^M
1
*

—

~
— —
-
-

~
t 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t t I 1 ] 1 1 i 1

.
3
&
i~
(Ti
0 i-H

f ^
D n
^ M
*
Vฃ!

-g
s
1
TJ
3
CN
•-i n
10 O 0 -H
CM ซ- J,
1S3M |
CO
K>ฃ iSV3 -S
ฃ 0 S $ N * "?)
II n
ป>
13 ^
"o — ^
•"* > *
II
2 '1


r-
CM
|
o

o
o
r-
i *"
8
to

I
h-
O)
1
1 t 1 I 1 f 1 1 ! | 1 t 1 { 1 1 t
~ —

^ ^

:
-

—

— —
_ ' —
— * '-'
^
~
— . -
_
**"
^
i ! i i i i i i i t t ) t t i i i i i i i
o o <
ง
M

-------
                                         1SV3
in
9
•t CN;
*~ '6

11
                                           CM
(O


 I
   E
2 2
      CM
   .
  1/1 •
  o

  o
  o
  •*
                        '    I    ''    'I
                                                                                 I
                                                                                 o
           I   I   I   t   I   I   I  I   I   I   I   I   I   I   1   I   I   1  I   1   I
              o
              CM
                                         1S3M
                                         1SV3
                                              CM
                                                                              to


                                                                              I
JI
       CM
   1
  O
  o
  o
               I   I    I   I   I   I   I   I   J   T   I   I    j
                                                                  I    I    I
                                                                               O
                                                                               in
               I   r   t  i  t  i   t   t   i-  i  f   t   t   t   i   i  t   t   tt
              O
              CM
                                                                                          ro
                                                                                        o
                                                                                       •H
                                                                                       I
                                                                                       -P
                                                                                        (0
                                                                                          8
                                                                                          oo
                                                                                          H
                                         1S3M
                                        E-22
                                                                                                      CD

                                                                                                      CD

-------
r-i

<ฐ. r-
Jl
s:ง
2  2
   to-
   o
   o
   to
   o
   o
   in
             s	$
        ~iiiiir
                                              1SV3
T    1     i    r
                                                                    I    r
                                                                                         1
                I    I   I    I   I    I   1    1   I    I   I    I   I   t   I   I   I   I   I   I
                o
                CM
                                             1S3M
                                                                                                    CTi
                                                                                                    r-H


                                                                                                    >1
CM
*

in
ID
2   ,_




E


1
   in •
   o
   o
   o
   o

   S
*    I
                                              1SV3
                                            r   ]     i
                                                                                   
-------
                                    1SV3
                i    I   t
                              i   l    l
                                            l   l   i
If
s:ง
S 2
  o
  o
  03


            O
            CM
                               J	I	I	I	I	I	i  i   i   r  i
                                    1S3M
                                                                              VD
en

">
                                    1SV3
                                               i —i  7   r
                                                                
         J	I	t  ;t	I	l	I	1	I	l	t  1   t   i.... i  i	i   t  . t.. t '. I.
                                    1S3M
                                                                                       co
                                                                                       co
                                   E-24

-------
o
o
J  ง
2  2
                                                               


                                                                         w
                                                                                       fr.
                                         1S3M
                                                                                                       CD

                                                                                                       CD
                                       E-25

-------
              
                                                                                        vo
                                                                                        n
                                                                                        .2
  O
  o
  \f>
               i   i   i   i   i   i   i   i
                                            1   1   i   I   I   i   I   I   I   1   1
                                                                                        .2
                                          1S3M
Ol


II
j?  _2   —
I!
 SI
2  2
   o
   o
   in
1    I    T
                                          1SV3
                                                                               -i
                                                                                         0)
                                                                                        4-1
                                                                                        M-l
                                                                                        •H
                                                                                        13

                                                                                         d

                                                                                        .2
                                                                                        4->
                                                                                         nj
                                                                                        8


                                                                                        ง
                                                                                        N
                                                                                        O
   o
   o
            1   1   i   I   I   t   I   It

               o
               CM
                                                                                        ja
                                                                                        
-------
en


O
   o
   >


   E


   I
2 2
  8'

  o
  o
  CO
                                      1SV3
          I   I   I    1   I   I    I   1   I    I   I
                                                                        
-------
1SV3
  1S3M
   1SV3
     1S3M
                                                              OD
                                                              CD
    E-28

-------
o
lf>  ,_
(0  03
"~  i/S

11  II



II



\\
s:ง
2  S
                                            1SV3
  o
  o
  UD
(O
                     i    ซ    i    f    I    I
                                                                   
-------
1SV3
  1S3M
   J.SV3
     1S3M
     E-30
                                                             03
                                                             co

-------
                                     1SV3
^ o
^5   _
g;s
2 2
      CM
  in-
  u
  o
  o
  o>

                   T   I    T
                                         CM
                                                      1   '   '

             I   I   I  I   I   I   I   I  1  I   1   I   I  1  I   1   t   I   t  1
                                    1S3M
                                                                                n
^ O
II
X •=
o .t
  o
  o
  o
                                     1SV3
                                         CM
                                                                     
-------
                                         1SV3
  IV


  in
x •=
o .E
  J
  o
  o
  o
  o
  in

                                  iir

              {  I   I   1   I   I   I   t  1   t   I   t   I   t   I   I  t   I   t   I
                                         1S3M
                                                       CTi
                                                       .-I


                                                       ฃ

                                                       3

                                                       ro
 . co
T- m

^ in
II
 X •=
  (J

  o
  o
  in
                                         1SV3
                                                           O
              t  t   t   i
I   t  I  t  t   l   t   i   I  _t_
                                                       OQ


                                                       -S
                                                        1-1
                                                                                         en
                                                       I
                                                       -P
                                                                                         8
                                         1S3M
                                            E-32
                                                                                                     CD

                                                                                                     oo

-------
                                     1SV3
         T   J    1   T
I    ป
                                         CM
2 2
  o
  o
  00

             I	i 	i   1  I  1	 1   1   I   1  1  I   I
                                                          I  I   I
                                                                                I


                                                                                vo

                                                                                CTi
                                     1S3M
                                                                                n
3 *
I!
  in-
  o
  o
  o
                                                                     ID
                                                                     v-

                                                                      I
                 I   I    I   J    I   1
                                             I   I   I
                                                           I    I   I
                                                                                m

                                                                                o
                                                                                •H
                                                     w

                                                     ft
                                                     w

                                                     I
                                                     JJ

                                                     fl
                                                     8

                                                     1
                                                     o
                                                                                 O
          1   i   1   t   1  II  I   I   til
             o
             CM
                                     1S3M
                                                     1   111  i   I
                                       E-33
                                                                                          CO

                                                                                          CO

-------
1SV3
q 2
11 ii
? ป
2 r _
-งo 5
> >
ii
X •=
o .E
2 2

f_
CM
X
ง5
H- 2
0
o
o
^

8
iO

0)
J
p
0>
1




r~
>f>
S ^
o T
ii
11 H
ป ซ,
3 *
Si ?
I!
x •=
o .E
2 2

^
CN
ฃ
rv
_1
w z
O
O
o
f)

1 '"



CM

ID
E
^
<7t
*••
i






_ '

ซ.
-

-

*"*
_


**

•*
ซ•

-
^



i







i
M.


ป-
"*
~
**

"*






III*

—


^

•#

!ซ•
1






* -t *
o-/ /— 	 	 -•
	 '"'•ฃ$'''

—
*
^_

-
i i i i i i i i i i i i t f i i t i i i
o o c
CM ^
1S3M


1SV3
4
^ ^ ^ *
0 * CJ *
1 i 1 I 1 1 i 1 I I I t { 1 i i

—

-
•"
-
-

"""
e, 0—-
•"" s
.--' 	 ....^',0.0^

' •—'""' \ '^
... .-1'"^ 3 x,

f } .--'"' .-'"
I - -\5.0 	 .'' ....'' _,
' - .- — ' J ---' f\*"
ft--' *>•
ซn.O . ^J
^ > „--'

*
'" ^,
--'
1 i ii 11 i i ii i i t i i i ri i i
o o <
CM *-
1S3M







ซ
^*
vo
r~
CTป
O iH

T >l
i d
8 ^
(0
m
r^
^
<
Oj
H
CO
g

rH
O
•H
^ fo

u
CO
JS
2 8
ง
M
0)
14-1
14-1
•H
•O
s
•H
+J
S
4J
ง
0 O
c
5 8
^
0 OJ
ID C
8
0

t
(C
CN
,—{
j
w
w
s
g
H
CM
Q


































































LT

-------
1SV3
m
M x
o Jฃ
r-j 7
11 ii
S Qj
|E
2 3
.i ฃ
x •-
o .E
2 2

^_
CM
X
^5
0

0
o
T-
1 •"
01
.ฃ
*~
2
i



ft oi
w Y
ii
11 ii
d)
•ฃป
1 o ?
It
g c
2 2

_
CM
X
Or
Kง
O
Q
O
m
o
2
^
^
2
i








i




-

-

•• •


-


••


-


i






i
ซ.


—
-
*


** *




_


-
-
-
i






n
^ ^* ^ *
-.. o.
/ '^ '^- \^* i i
/•'' "^-.....x / \ |
'"- 	 ., ,,''"/-- -10. 0--V.V.'-'' \
•- 	 ._ y ; \ ""--._.--'
''0 •$$)*


-
_
1 i i i i i i t t i 1 i i i i r i i i i
0 O <
CM ซ-
1S3M


Tซ OC
0




•


_

r-
o S

5 2?
0 1?
ro
,— i

*
ป=C
fX
H
1
iH
O
^^ "
n3

5
1
O
Q)
^l
(jj
^^
M-J
•H
I
-P
(0
ii
c
O o

'5 ง
3
o a)
s
o
4
3
i
w
H
O





























































LO
oo
co

-------
1SV3
to •
o T
11 II
D "
E E
1 1
S :E
2 2


ซ-
CM
X
O
o
ID
1 •"
8
p-


JE
*~
oป
1




en
03 *7
CM "^

11 II
J S

> > *
1!
x •=
0 .E
2 2

CM

crt 2
O
o
0
r-
r—
| *~

s
2
HI
E
*~
at
T





a
S * 3 * '
^ i i i t i t i i i i i i i i i i i


\ -
— "" 	 ฃ)•_
„ 	 , "•
w '"-.^
\
. ''
'N-o-s- -- 	 ''
"
-ป
*"
-
-

_^
^^

"
t f i 1 1 1 t i i i 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t t t
O O C
CM ^
1S3M


1SV3
d
* * •* '
(O * CM ^~
1 j 1 1 1 j I 1 1 | ! 1 < ) I ( 1
***
-IW —

~ -X \
ฐ'c
' \
..'"' ฐ-
""* l r," ^ \> ซ••
• 9 ,'""•-% ' x!
( ^ 	 10.0:''' /
wป
"
m- -

~*
_
"

"* —
t i ii t it r t i fir t i t r l if i
0 0 t
CM ป-
1S3M


E-3fi
2



^
S
^-i1

vo
S^
O H
"s ^
5 S
1-1
^
o


Tl
ง

rH
O
•H
O S-f
3 (5

I
g
1

ป w
™ s
S

m
•H

1
Id
ii
o O
^™ ฃ*
E 8
ง I
O

O
cs
1
W
&
D
H
Q






























































IT)
oo
CO

-------
i*>
ซฐS

- " -
>l *
11
S.E
2 2
CM
I
!/ir
o
0.
o
rO
1 *~
O
o
rg
^-

1C
^
91
1






1
-
-


^



-

w


_
.

Mป
|





I
•ป

-
-
•*
•M-



—




^

-
1





1SV3
q
5 $ S *
| 1 t 1 | i t 1 ( I 1 1 | 1 i I
-

.'"~~\
/

s — ^™
-~^ •-.-,,-"" 'v..;::--^
. ., n 	 •' /• • • ฐ\
... ,-100 ;.;;;-.;-_-— ij:o -::::.-.-'::.- :- - b.s.
/'•;V^"io|?"--".-25.6::::-':-y''--'.jN;>>; '^ o, \
/""'" -''"^ ! \ „<•'*,' N. \ 'l
' ' ***.'/ / 	 r * "/- * X " * " '*' '
' '•- "/ .' / "•-. /yO".'K.Q---'.'.V --"...-'
	 _...-. LtejtfH^V" •"'
v'---;;:.''^;?.'."-5.o':''
*
*' ซi

t I i l i l l t t I ! i i i i i l i i i
S 2
1S3M
1SV3
a
•* * •*
ฎ * CM *

( 1 t ( [ 1 1 I | 1 1 t | 1 I 1

^
-
•M
-
'""—""----SO 	 -.x
	 - 	 v.O'.QL.- ^ '.,
X 	 -^.ฐ_20.0 	 V- ::"~ ->, \ \ \
^•"' '••-"'.'.-•-'-.. -2^-ฐ""" } : ''. X' \
-' /•'.-''' 	 — . "•--"-•6'-"'---'' •'
•' / ---' """ ; .' .--&•.••". 	 --'
'' •'' '' ^^0o-oo'o-''::'-^
; ' 	 ^ •JP --^ '' '
--"----'-"-;"6.ฐ'.--'
\ s' *'' -'* -^^ . 	
'' ^' •' 'l **
/'' -'' ,' * - '

,' t* * *f '""•
1 1 i 1 1 f t 1 t I 1 t 1 I j 1 I t I 1
0 O C
CM ••-
1S3M


0
1

•
S
js
IQ
vw
c^
o 2
*_ r™n
5 $
3 ซ
0 ^
IS> J
oo
r— 1

^
ffl
(^
H
w
1
ป0
rH
0 -3

w
C
E
a a)
"" B
rti
S
rH

-------
1SV3
                                            r-
                                            CTi
                                             m

                                             PJ
                                             H
  1S3W
   1SV3
     1S3M
    E-38

-------
  00
                                         1SV3
II
g IE
2 2
C/5 •
O

O
O
00
  O
  O
            s	$
           ~T   '    i    'I    r
                                              ซ•
                                              CM
 T
|
1
'c
2
rg
X
1—
ss
o
o
o
r-~
i *~
o
o
10
V
p:
O)
1
d
S $ A *
1 [ 1 t I 1 f 1 t ) t 1 1 1 I 1 1
_

\
^^ X.^
** \ "~-ป. .'- — n* —
x. 	 ฐsv
2 .^^;:::?-VX I
.x' i'" •r"^--. l'--.^ ij '• \ 'N
H- 1"-'1' *. '' " "*'N'^ ' O V *"
i i 'V^-0"* /^ ,/
_ "x- \ \ '*"' P- e\ -' 1 '
----- , \ -— -.^s-Q.;;.. ,,'
.-,"----'o""ป"—- ''
-
—

•*•
"

*'

1 t i t 1 1 1 i t 1 t I 1 t f 1 I ( 1 It
S 2
0
1





o












Q

                                                                                1
                                         1S3M
                                                                                   1C
                                                                                   r^
                                                                                   CTi
                                                                                      ro
                                                                                      CQ
                                                                                      'O
                                                                                    s

                                                                                   ,8
                                                                                    0)
                                                                                      
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO. 2.
EPA 450/4-90-006E
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE URBAN AIRSHED MODEL STUDY OF FIVE
CITIES - A Low Cost Application of the Urban Airshed
Model to the New York Metropolitan Area and the City of
St. Louis EPA 450/4-90-006E
7. AUTHOR(S)
Ralph E. Morris, Thomas C. Myers, Henry Hogo, Lyle R.
Chinkin, LuAnn Gardner, Robert G. Johnson
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Systems Applications, Inc.
101 Lucas Valley Road
San Rafael, CA 94903
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
April 1990
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
CODE
REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

16. ABSTRACT
This document presents Urban Airshed Modeling results for New York and St.
Included are a series of emissions strategies based on Reid Vapor Pressure
reduction and alcohol/gasoline blended fuels.
Louis.
(RVP)
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTORS b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Ozone
Urban Airshed Model
Photochemistry
Ethanol
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT 19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page )
c. COSATI Field/Group

21. NO. OF PAGES
319
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)    PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE

-------
                                                        INSTRUCTIONS

  1.   REPORT NUMBER
       Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

  2.   LEAVE BLANK

  3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
       Reserved for use by each report recipient.

  4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
       Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Sot subtitle, it' used, in smulicr
       type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
       number and include subtitle for the specific title.

  5.   REPORT DATE
       Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
       approval, date of preparation, etc.),

  6.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
       Leave blank.

  7.   AUTHOR(S)
       Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, efc.J.  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
       zation.

  8.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
       Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.                                                     ~~

  9.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
       Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

  10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
       Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

  11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
       Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.

  12.  SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
       Include ZIP code.

  13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
       Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

  74.  SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
       Insert appropriate code.

  15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
       Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as: Prepared in cooperation with. Translation of. Presented a) conference of,
       To be published in. Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

  16.  ABSTRACT
       Include a brief ^200 words or less) factual summary of the  most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains u
       significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

  17.  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
       (a) DESCRIPTORS -  Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authori/ed terms that identify the major
       concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as  index entries for cataloging.

       (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
       ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

       (c) COSATI HELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List.  Since the ma-
       jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group  assignment^) will be specific discipline, area of human
       endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Held/Group assignments that will follow
       the  primary posting(s).

  18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
       Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited."  Cite any availability to
       the  public, with address and price.

  19. &20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
       DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

  21.  NUMBER OF PAGES
       Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, il any.

  22.  PRICE
       Insert the price set by the National Technical Information  Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 2220-1  (Rev. 4-77) (Reverse)

-------