PESTICIDES  IN  GROUND WATER DATA BASE

            1988 INTERIM REPORT
                           \
       United States Environmental Protection Agency
              Office of Pesticide Programs
          Environmental Fate &  Effects  Division
       Environmental Fate & Ground Water Branch
                  December 1988

-------
PESTICIDES IN  GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
            1988 INTERIM  REPORT
                       by:

                 W.  Martin Williams
                 Patrick W. Holden
                 Douglas W. Parsons
                 Matthew N. Lorber
       United States Environmental Protection Agency
             Office of Pesticide  Programs
         Environmental  Fate &  Effects Division
       Environmental Fate & Ground Water  Branch
                  December  1988

-------
                                  CCNTENTS



Section

  1.0   EXECUTIVE SUMVfcRY                                              1-1

  2.0   nrcraXJCTICN                                                   2-1
        2 . 1  Background                                                2-1
        2.2  Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base                       2-1

  3.0   ASSESSMENTS WI1H THE DATA. BASE                                 3-1

        3.1  Assessment Categories                                     3-1
        3.2  Overall Results                                           3-1
        3.3  Conparison to Previous Assessments                         3-7
        3.4  About the Appendices                                      3-15

  4.0   (XNCLUSICNS                                                    4-1

        4.1  Caveats                                                   4-1
        4.2  Major Data Gaps                                           4-2
        4.3  Discussion of the Results                                 4-4
        4.4  Future Uses of the Data by EPA                            4-4

  5.0   REFERENCES                                                     5-1

  APPENDICES

        APPENDIX A - Additional Bac)cground Information

        APPENDIX B - Positive Entries Sorted by  Chemical

        APPENDIX c - Positive Entries Sorted by  State

        APPENDIX D - Summary Assessment Sorted by  Chemical by Category

        APPENDIX E - Data Base Bibliography

        APPENDIX F - Full Data Base Listing (Under Separate Cover)

-------
                               LIST OF FIGURES
1-1   Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water as a Result of        1-4
      Agricultural Practices (current assessment)

3-1   Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water as a Result of        3-10
      Agricultural Practices (current assessment)

3-2   Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water as a Result of        3-12
      Agricultural Practices (based on U.S. EPA, 1987)

3-3   Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water (based on Parsons     3-13
      & Witt, 1988)

3-4   Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water (based on U.S.        3-14
      PIRG, 1988)

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

Ma*
l-l   confirmed Detections of Pesticides in Ground Water                1-5
3-1   Categories Used for Assessments                                   3-2
3-2   Current National Assessments of Pesticides in Ground Water        3-3
3-3   Number of Pesticides Detected in Ground Water in each State       3-4
3-4   Number of states in which each Pesticide has been Detected        3-5
3-5   Confirmed Detections of Pesticides in Ground Water Due to
      Agricultural Use and Point-Source Contamination                   3-8
3-6   National Assessments of Pesticides in Ground Water:
      Current vs. Prior                                                 3-11

-------
                             1.0  EXECUTIVE SUMV&RY

 Background

      Cne of EEA's priorities is  to determine the extent of pesticides
 occurring in the nation's ground water.  While many individual, localized
 ground-water monitoring studies  have been conducted across the country, there
 has been no comprehensive compilation of these results.  In response to this,
 the U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, has
 developed the Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base.  The data base contains
 information derived from monitoring studies conducted by pesticide
 registrants, universities, and government agencies.  The data base identifies
 the pesticides that have been looked for in ground water, the areas that have
 been monitored,  and the pesticides that have been detected.  The data base was
 developed in the first  quarter of  1988, and at the same time, a public docket
 was established so interested parties could have access to the source
 information.

      Following the development of  the data base, the Agency has been
 conducting a program to assess the validity of the information it contains.
 The program involves contacting  the author or director of each monitoring
 study and requesting that they review and confirm our interpretation of the
 information.   The authors are being requested to identify the source of
 contamination for each  reported  detection and document the laboratory
 analytical methodology  used to quantify the results.  At this time, we believe
we  have gathered sufficient information to provide the public with an interim
 report on the national  status of pesticide residues in ground water.

Results

     To incorporate the scientific rigor and quality assurance we have
 instilled in this program,  the results are presented in several categories
based on  the confidence we have  in the information.  Many of the reported
detections  have  not been confirmed, and some of the contamination  is  from
unknown sources.   However,  we consider all of this  information important, and
have segregated  the data accordingly.
                                         1-1

-------
      We have tried to distinguish point-source contamination from pesticide
 occurrence in ground water resulting from leaching through the soil profile
 following normal agricultural applications.  In general, point-source
 pollution refers to water pollution caused by discharges into receiving waters
 from the end of  pipelines, localized spills, or other identifiable "points".
 We have broadened this definition in presenting our results to include
 documented misuse (i.e., use on a crop or in areas for which it is not
 registered)  as well as conventional point sources such as spills or well
 contamination by direct channelling.

      Each entry  in the data base has been assigned a rating reflecting the
 quality or confidence in the results.  Studies that have been conducted under
 sound documented protocols where the results have been confirmed by acceptable
 analytical techniques are assigned the highest rating of confirmation.  Lower
 ratings  are assigned to studies in which the protocols are less poorly
 documented and analytical confirmations are less reliable.

     A total of  six categories have been, designed to present the results, but
 three categories  are given particular attention.  Category 2 includes all
 information collected to date - excluding data known to be of poor quality  and
 data that  is  from known point-source contamination.  Category 5 includes
 information that  has been derived from scientifically confirmed studies where
 the contamination is attributed solely to normal agricultural use.  Category 6
 includes confirmed information attributed solely to known point sources or
documented misuse.   Tne results from these categories are given below:
                                           Number of       Number  of
                  Category                Pesticides       States with
      	Detected	Detections
       2. All data excluding data of            74               38
          known poor quality and known
          point sources or misuse
       5. Confirmed data attributed             46               26
          to normal agricultural use
       6. Confirmed data attributed to          32               12
          point sources or misuse
                                       1-2

-------
      Hie results frcm categories  2 and 5 are depicted on a map of the united
 States in Figure 1-1.   Table l-l  presents a summary of pesticides that have
 confirmed detections in ground water attributed to normal agricultural use
 (category 5)  and point sources or documented misuse (category 6).  This table
 also illustrates whether the pesticide has been included as an analyte in the
 National Pesticide Survey,  the number of states in which each pesticide has
 been detected,  the range of concentrations detected, and the proposed EPA
 Health Advisory for the pesticide.

      Because  many of the studies  in category 2 have not yet been confirmed and
 the unknown sources may be  the result of normal agricultural practices, we
 believe that  the precise representation of the national status of pesticide
 residues in ground water as a result of normal agricultural application is
 greater than  category 5.  It is important to note, however, that one or two
 detections of a pesticide at trace levels, does not indicate a problem in
 itself.   However,  a particular pesticide detected at numerous locations at
 concentrations  equal to or  greater than Health advisory levels is reason for
 concern.   For this reason,  it is  critical to look at both the frequency of
 detections and  their concentrations, and how those concentrations ccnpare to
 established and proposed health numbers for a specific pesticide before
 drawing conclusions on the  severity of the problem.

 Caveats on Using the Data ffiVffi

     Ihere are  dangers in trying  to use Figure l-l to indicate the statistical
 significance  of the problem on a  national level.  Many of the studies were
 only designed to sanple vulnerable ground water or to investigate suspected
 problems, while other  studies were designed to be statistically unbiased.   It
 is  important  to note that the studies have not been limited to drinking water
 supplies  and  some studies have sampled many types of wells including wells
 used only for observation or irrigation.  Many of the studies have
concentrated  on shallow ground water which may not be representative of the
drinking water  sources of the area.  As such, the results cannot be  used to
estimate human  exposure to  pesticides in drinking water.

     Pinpointing the source of pesticide contamination  is perhaps the most
                                       1-3

-------
                                                 FIGURE 1-1
                            Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water
                                   As a Result of Agricultural Practice
                                              Category 2/ Category 5
-JS
                                                                                                MASS
                                                                                               w  4/3
                                                                                              CONN. 8/8
                                                                                            NJ 6/5

                                                                                            MO 8/6
                                                                                                    15/7
                                Category 2:  All information except data of known poor quality or
                                           known point source origin.
                                Category 5:  Only confirmed data attributed to agricultural uses.

-------
                    TPBLE 1-1
Conf irmed Detections of Pesticides  in Ground Water
Cancelled
or
Oienical Severely
Name Restricted
1,2-D
1,3-D
2,4,5-T
2,4-D
2,4-DB
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Mdrin
Arsenic
Atraton
Atrazine
EHC
Bromacil
Carbofuran
Chlordane
Oilorothalonil
Cyanazine
EBCP
DDT
Dacthal
Diazinon
Dicamba
Dieldrin
Dinoseb
Diuron
ECB
Endosulfan
Qxirin
Ethoprop
Fonofos
Heptacnlor
Hexazincne
Lindane
Linuron
Malathion
Methamidophos
Metfionyl
Methyl parathion
Metolachlor
Metrtbuzin
Qxamyi
Y

Y





Y


Y


Y


Y
Y



Y
Y

Y

Y


Y

Y








Analyte Health
in Advisory
NFS ** Level ***
(PPb)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y
Y
Y
Y


Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
0.0013 *
0.20 *
21
70

1.5 *
10



3.0

80
36
0.03 *
1.5 *
9.0
0.02 *

3500
0.63
9.0
0.00219 *
7.0
14
0.0005 *

0.032

14
0.076 *
210
0.026 *



175
2.0
10
175
175
Normal Use Point Source
States Maximum Median
with Concen. Concen.****
Detects (ppb) (ppb)
4
1

2

12
7
2
1
1
13
1
2
3
1
2
6
2
3
1
1
2
2
3
1
6
1

1
2

1
3
1
1
1
1
1
5
4
3
550.00
270.00

49.50

113.00
315.00
0.10
N/A
0.10
40.00
4.30
22.00
176.00
1.80
12.60
7.00
0.02
402.00
1039.00
478.00
1.10
0.02
36.70
N/A
14.00
0.40

12.60
0.90

9.00
47.00
2.70
53.00
10.50
9.00
256.00
32.30
6.80
395.00
4.50
123.00

1.40

0.90
9.00
0.10
N/A
0.10
0.50
2.70
9.00
5.30
1.70
0.02
0.40
0.01
1.70
109.00
162.00
0.60
0.02
0.70
N/A
0.90
0.30

N/A
0.10

8.00
0.10
1.90
41.50
4.80
N/A
88.40
0.40
0.60
4.30
States
with
Detects

1
1
1
1
7


1

7
1
1

1
1
1

1

1
1
1


1
1
1


1

1

1


1
5
1

                 1-5

-------
                                                1-1
                     Confirmed Detections of Pesticides in Grouni Water
                                         (continued)
Normal Use Point Source
Cancelled
or
Chemical Severely
Name Restricted
FOB
PCP
Parathion
Picloram
Prcmeton
Propazine
Silvex Y
Simazine
Sulprofos
Tim Y
Ttaxaphene Y
Trialiate
Trifluralin
Analyte
in
NFS **


Y

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y


Y
Health
Advisory
Level ***
(PPb)

220

490
100
14
52
35

0.031


2.0

States
witn
Detects


1
3
1
2

7
1
1
1

4

Maxinun
Concen.

-------
 difficult parameter to confirm in the data base.  Contamination can result
 from causes other than leaching through the soil profile following normal
 field applications.   These causes include:  iuproper pesticide disposal,
 accidental spills, rinsate from equipment maintenance, human error in mixing,
 intentional excess applications,  back siphoning into a well during
 chemigation, or direct channelling of pesticides through poorly constructed or
 damaged wells.   It is difficult to conclude with confidence that ground-water
 contamination is the result of leaching from normal agricultural use, unless
 the above factors can be excluded.

 Use of the Data Base bv EF&

      The data base will be used by the Agency to supplement the regulatory
 process for pesticides.   It is being used to target pesticides that are
 contaminating ground water and establish priority candidates for regulation to
 mitigate such problems.   The data base is being used to help identify the
 migration pathways and environmental factors associated with contamination
 which are the first  steps in developing mitigation strategies.  It will also
 be used to highlight vulnerable areas for which reduced applications or other
 restrictions may be  warranted, and to depict data gaps where additional
 monitoring should be conducted.   In addition, the data base can be used in
 support of the  reregistration  of a pesticide for which ground-water
 contamination has not been shown to be a problem.  Tne importance given to the
 data base in these functions will increase as the data base evolves.

      With over  50 percent of the nation's population relying on ground water
 for their drinking water source,  we cannot underestimate the seriousness  of
pesticides occurring in ground water.  To address this problem, the Agency has
many additional ongoing programs.  ETA has developed an Agricultural Chemicals
 in Ground Water Strategy tx> delineate the appropriate federal  and  state roles
and minimize the risk for future ground-^water contamination.   In addition, the
National  Pesticide Survey is being conducted to sample drinking water wells
throughout the  country to statistically assess the occurrence  and  levels of
pesticides in drinking water,wells.  This type of statistically designed study
is more appropriate  for  assessing human exposure to pesticides in  drinking
water than the  Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base.  As part  of the National
                                     1-7

-------
Pesticide Survey, Health Advisory levels have been developed for 62
pesticides.  Tfie Agency has also developed a ground-water training module to
educate certified applicators about preventing ground-water contamination.
Ground-water monitoring studies are being required of registrants for the
initial registration of chemicals and the reregistration of existing
pesticides whose physicochemical properties indicate that they may persist in
the environment and are likely to leach to ground water.  For some pesticides,
these programs have resulted in cancellations or voluntary withdrawals, the
denial of new registrations and reregistrations, label statements to restrict
application rates, restrictions on use in vulnerable areas, designation as a
restricted-use pesticide, or Special Reviews (e.g., aldicarti).
                                     1-8

-------
                              2.0   IMTCDUCTICN

 2.1  Background

      Prior to the late 1970's, ground-water contamination from field-applied
 pesticides was almost entirely unexpected - primarily because soils were
 thought to behave as natural  filters, and pesticides were assumed to degrade
 or volatilize rapidly.  The discovery of aldicarb in 96 wells on Long Island
 (in 1979)  and EBCP in over  2000 wells in California (from 1979-1982) focused
 attention on pesticides used  in agriculture as potential ground-water
 contaminants.   By the early 1980's, several incidents of ground-water
 contamination resulting from  the  field application of pesticides had been
 confirmed.   Since then, increasing numbers of pesticides have been detected in
 ground water in an increasing number of states  (Cohen, et. al, 1984; Cohen,
 et.  al, 1986;  and Holden, 1986).  In 1987, the U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency documented 19 pesticides occurring in ground water from 24 states
 attributed to  agricultural  practices (EPA/OPTS, 1987).

 2.2   Pesticides in Ground Water Pgfca Base

      Many  localized,  individual ground-water monitoring studies for pesticides
 have since been conducted across  the country; however, there has been no
 comprehensive  compilation of  these results to assess the nature and scope of
 pesticide  residues in ground  water.  In response to this, the Environmental
 Protection Agency,  Office of  Pesticide Programs, Qn^raranental Fate & Effects
 Division has developed the  Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base.  The data
 base contains  the results of  monitoring studies conducted by federal and state
 agencies, chemical manufacturers, and universities.  These results have been
 obtained frcm  published literature and through direct correspondence to the
Agency.  The data base  identifies the pesticides that have been looked  for  in
ground water,  the areas that  have been monitored, and the pesticides that have
been detected.   It has not  been the intent of the data base to maintain a
record of every sample that has been collected  and analyzed for pesticide
residues.  The data base represents summary results  (e.g., number of wells
sampled, number of  positive wells found, and the ranges of concentrations)  for
                                    2-1

-------
 monitoring studies that have been conducted.  To the extent possible,  these
 results are itemized down to the county level and by origin of contamination
 (e.g.,  point source vs. leaching due to agricultural application).   Hie data
 base was developed in the first quarter of 1988, and at the same time, a
 public  docket, containing the original source of information for every entry
 in the  data base, was established so interested parties could have access to
 the information.  The following contact is given for additional information on
 the public docket:

             united States Environmental Protection agency
             Office of Pesticides Program
             Field Operations Division (TS-787C)
             Public Docket & Freedom of Information Section
             401 M Street, S.W.
             Washington, DC  20460
             Telephone:  (703) 557-2805

     The data has been obtained from many different studies that have not been
conducted  under a single standardized protocol.  In order to minimize the
misuse  of  poor quality data, the Agency has been conducting a program to
assess  the validity of the information in the data base.  This program
includes contacting the author or director of each monitoring study to  request
that they  confirm our interpretation of their data, fill in missing
information,  and document the laboratory analytical methodology used to
quantify the results.

     A.  status report on pesticides in the nation's ground water  is presented
in the  following sections.  Section 3 presents assessments made  from  the data
base.   Included in Section 3 are summaries of the number of pesticides  found
in ground  water and the number of states in which they have been detected.
Additional results are presented for  data that has been confirmed  to date.
Conclusions arc given in Section 4 along with appropriate caveats for using
the data.   This section discusses how the Agency will be using this data in
the future.   References are contained in Section 5, and background  information
on both the data base structure and the data confirmation  program are given in
Appendix A.   Data listings and other summary tables are included in Appendices
B through  F.
                                        2-2

-------
                     3.0   ASSESSMENTS WITH THE EKEA. BASE

 3.1  &??^^aU*^l ft Categories
      Over 70 different pesticides have been  reported in ground water in nearly
 40 states; however,  many of the reported detections have not been confirmed,
 and some of the contamination has resulted from unknown sources.  The results
 are presented in six categories in order to  differentiate normal agricultural
 use from point-source contamination and  to reflect the confidence we have in
 the information.   Hie results range from assessments based on all data in the
 data base to assessments that only include data that has been confirmed and
 attributed to a single source of contamination.  The categories are presented
 and defined in Table 3-1.

      Three of the categories are given particular attention.  Category 2
 includes all information collected to date,  except data known to be of poor
 quality or data where the contamination  has  been documented as being due to
 point sources or some mechanism other than field leaching due to agricultural
 application.   Category 5 includes information that has been derived from
 scientifically confirmed studies where the origin of ccntamination is
 attributed solely to normal agricultural use.   Category 6 includes information
 confirmed from studies where the contamination is attributed solely to known
 point sources, direct well channelling,  or uses in a manner for which they
 have not been registered (i.e., misuse).
3.2
     An inventory of pesticides  that  have been detected in ground water from
these six categories is presented in  Table 3-2,   The table indicates the
number of pesticides that have been found in ground water and the number of
states in which pesticides have  been  found.   These summaries are expanded in
Tables 3-3 and 3-4.  Table 3-3 illustrates the number of pesticides that have
been reported in ground water for each state.  Table 3-4 presents the number
of states in which each pesticide has been detected.  Table 3-4 also footnotes
which of the pesticides have  been cancelled or have had their use severely
                                   3-1

-------
                                       TABLE 3-1
                            Categories Used for Assessments
CAIEGCRY DESCRIPTION!
1 All data
CODE INCLUDES
Origin: All
Confirm: 0-5
3 EXCLUDES
None
None
           All data except suspected point
           sources or known poor quality.

           Suspected field use data excluding
           known poor quality.

           Confirmed, quality data of unknown
           or suspected field use origin.

           Confirmed, quality data of known or
           suspected field use origin.

           Confirmed, quality data of known or
           suspected point source origin.
 Origin: NFU,SFU,N/A   PS,SPS,DC,SDC
Confirm: 0-3           4-5
 Origin: NFU,SFU
Confirm: 0-3
PS,SPS,DCISDC,N/
4-5
 Origin: NFU,SFU,N/A   PS,SPS,DC,SDC
Confirm: 1,2           0,3-5
 Origin: NFU,SFU
Confirm: 1,2
PS,SPS,DC,SDC,N/
0,3-5
 Origin: PS.SPS.DC.SDC NFU.SFU.N/A
Confirm: 1,2           0,3-5
Origin of Contaminatior

NFU   Known normal field use
SFU   Suspected normal field use
PS    Known point source
SPS   Suspected point source
DC    Direct channeling
SDC   Suspected direct channeling
N/A   Unknown origin

Confirmation Rating

1 - 5 in which "1" is very confidant, subsequently "5"  is poor quality data.
      A code of "0" indicates that the confirmation has not been, conpleted.
                                         3-2

-------
                                    TABLE 3-2
            Current National Assessments of Pesticides in Ground Water
Category
Description
  No. of
Pesticides
 Detected
   NO, Of
States with
  Detected
 Pesticides
        All data
                                77
                      39
        All data ejscept suspected point         74
        sources or known poor quality.

        Suspected field use data excluding      65
        known poor quality.

        Confirmed, quality data of unknown      52
        or suspected field use origin.

        Confirmed, quality data of known or     46
        suspected field use origin.

        Confirmed, quality data of known or     32
        suspected point source origin.
                                                 38
                                                 36
                                                 27
                                                 26
                                                 12
                                 3-3

-------
                         TABLE 3-3
Number of Pesticides Detected in Ground Water in each State
CATEGORIES
STATE
Alaska
Alabama
ArJcansas
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Iowa
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kansas
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Maryland
Maine
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Montana
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nebraska
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
Wisconsin
, 1
1
3
3
3
13
1
8
14
2
10
13
15
17
1
14
2
15
8
12
2
15
13
5
3
4
9
6
3
24
2
7
4
5
4
9
12
4
2
18
2
1
3
0
2
13
1
8
11
2
10
8
1
9
1
12
2
15
8
11
2
15
13
5
2
3
9
6
3
21
2
7
4
5
4
6
11
3
2
15
3
1
3
0
2
13
1
8
11
2
3
7
1
9
0
4
2
15
8
10
2
0
12
5
1
3
9
6
3
11
2
7
3
4
4
4
11
3
2
10
4
0
0
0
1
>8
1
8
4
1
0
7
0
4
0
12
2
7
6
11
0
15
13
0
1
2
8
5
0
11
0
6
3
4
0
2
0
3
1
7
5
0
0
0
1
8
1
8
4
1
0
7
0
4
0
4
2
7
6
10
0
0
12
0
1
2
8
5
0
11
0
6
3
3
0
1
0
3
1
7
6
0
0
3
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
14
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
                          3-4

-------
                        TABLE 3-4
Number of States in which each Pesticide has been Detected
CATEGORY
CHEMICAL
1,2-D l,3
I, 3-D 2
2,4,5-T 3
2,4-D
2,4-DB
Alachlor 2
Aldicarb *
Aldrin
Ametryn
Arsenic 3
Atraton
Atrazine ^
Az inctos-methy 1
BHC 3
Benomyl
Bromacil 1
Butylate
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Chloramben
Chlordane 3
Chlorothalonil 2
Qilorpyrifos
Cryolite
Cyanazine
£)Q£p 1 ,3
DDT 3
Dacthal
Diazinon 2
Dicamba
Dieldrin 3
Dimethoate
Dinoseb 3
Disulfotcn
Diuron 1
EEB 1'3
EFTC
Endosulfan
Endrin 2'3
Ethoprop
1
6
3
4
13
1
19
22
5
1
1
1
22
1
3
1
3
1
3
7
1
6
4
2
1
10
6
7
4
3
9
7
1
4
1
2
10
2
5
2
1
2
6
2
3
10
0
18
22
4
1
1
1
19
1
2
1
3
1
2
6
1
3
3
1
1
8
5
5
4
1
6
5
1
4
1
2
8
2
3
1
1
3
5
1
1
7
0
15
21
3
0
1
1
17
1
2
1
2
0
0
6
0
2
3
1
0
6
3
5
3
1
4
4
1
4
1
2
7
0
2
1
1
4
4
1
2
4
0
13
8
2
0
1
1
15
0
1
0
3
0
0
3
0
2
2
0
0
7
3
3
1
1
4
3
0
3
0
1
6
1
1
0
1
5
4
1
0
2
0
12
7
2
0
1
1
13
0
1
0
2
0
0
3
0
1
2
0
0
6
2
3
1
1
2
2
0
3
0
1
6
0
1
0
1
6
0
1
1
1
1
7
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
                       3-5

-------
                                 TABLE 3-4
           Number of States in which each Pesticide has been Detected
                                (continued)
CATEGORY
CHEMICAL
FonofOS
Glyphosate
Heptacnlor 3
Hexazinone
Isofenphos
Lindane
Linuron
fCPA
Malathion
Metalaxyl
Methamidophos
Methomyl
Methyl parathion
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Molinate
Naled
Oxamyl
PdSB
Paraquat
Parathion
Pentachloropheno 1
Phosmet
Pic lor am
Prometon
Propachlor
Propaztne
Silvex 3
Sinazine ^
Sulprofos
TCP
TDE
Tebuthiuron
Terbufos
Toxaphene 3
Trial late
Trifluralin
1
2
1
5
2
1
8
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
11
6
1
2
3
1
1
1
4
1
8
2
2
3
2
13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
2
2
I
3
2
I
6
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
7
6
1
1
3
0
1
1
3
1
8
2
2
2
1
12
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
3
2
1
2
1
1
5
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
5
5
1
0
3
0
0
1
1
1
5
2
1
2
1
10
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
5
4
2
0
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
7
6
0
0
3
0
0
1
2
0
5
1
1
2
0
8
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
5
2
0
0
1
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
5
5
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
7
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
6
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1 CDFA 1987 confirmed, normal field use
2 CDEA. 1987 confirmed, point source or illegal use
3 Pesticides which have been cancelled or their use has been severely
  restricted.
                                  3-6

-------
 restricted.

      Table 3-5 presents a sunroary  for pesticides that have been detected in
 ground water due to normal agricultural use  (category 5), point sources or
 misuse (category 6), and unidentified sources.  This table only incorporates
 data that has been confirmed by the Agency to date.  The table identifies
 which pesticides have been confirmed, the states in which they have been
 found, and their maximum and "median" concentrations in ground water.  In this
 table, the median concentration is represented as the median of the average
 concentrations from each study included in the category (where the average
 concentration is calculated as the mean of all positive detections in a
 study).   If  a single study comprises the category, the median concentration is
 represented  by the average concentration for the study.  If the category is
 comprised of a single well,  than the average concentration for that well is
 given.  The  table also indicates the proposed Health Advisory level for the
 pesticide, whether it has been included as an analyte in the Agency's National
 Pesticide Survey,  and whether  the  pesticide has been cancelled or severely
 restricted.   The results from  categories 2 and 5 are depicted on a map of the
 United states in Figure 3-1.

 3.3   Comparisons to Previous Assessments

      Table 3-6  compares the results of these six categories to several other
 recent assessments of pesticides in ground water in the United States.  The
 first study  presented (EPA/OPTS, 1987) is an update to earlier assessments
presented by the Agency in 1984 and 1986 (Cohen et. al, 1984; Cohen  et. al,
 1986)  before the data base was formalized.  The second study  (Parsons and
Witt,  1988)  was conducted at Oregon state University, Department of
Agricultural Chemistry and presents the results of a mail-in survey  with  lead
state agencies.  The third study was conducted by the U.S. Public Information
Research Group  (U.S.  PIRG)  in  the  summer of  1988 using EPA's public  docket
 (Hind and Evans,  1988).   The results from these three studies are presented on
maps of the  United States in Figures 3-2 through 3-4, respectively.

     Discrepancies between the assessments are based on the data available to
the researchers  at the time of the study and the method used  in their data
                                   3-7

-------
00
                                                                     mBLE 3-5
                                             Confirmed Pest icicles Detected  in Ground Water Due to
                                                Agricultural Use and Point-Source Contamination
                                                  Normal Use (Category 5)              Point Source (Category 6)
Unknown Origin
Cancelled
or
Chewical Severely
None Restricted
1,20 Y
1.10
2.4.S T Y
2.4 0
2.4 OB
Alarhlor

Aldicarb
Aldrm
Arsenic Y
Atraton
Atrazine

BHC Y
Brnwtri 1
Carlufuran
Chlordane Y
rhlorothalani 1
Cyanaz i lie
DBCP Y
DPT Y
llacthal
Diazinon
Oicaaba
Uieldrin Y
Uinoseb Y
CUuion
KI1B V
Endosulfaii
Endrin "
Ethoprop
R»K)fOK
Heptachlor Y
llttvav \ nniM»
Alialyl
111
NTS

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y
Y

Y
Y

Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y
Y
e Health
Advisory
" Level "* States with
(ppb) Detections
0 0011 *
0 20 *
21
70

1 5 *

10



1 0


80
36
0 03 •
1 S •
9 0
0 02 *

3500
0 63
9 0
0 00219 *
7 0
14
0 OOOS •

0 012

14
0 076 '
210
CA CT MA NY
NY

CT ME

CT FL IA IL
MD ME NE PA
CA FL MA 1C
MS 3C
TX
MD
CA CO CT IA
ME NE NJ PA
MS
CA FL
MA NY RI
MS
HE NY
IA LA MD NE
CA AZ
MS NJ SC
NY
MS
CT 1C
NE NJ
MA ME NY
CA
CA CT GA MA
HE

NY
IA NE

ME

Haxiimin
Concen
(ppb)
V£> 00
270 00

49 SO

KS LA MA 113 00
Wl
NY RI Wl US 00
0 10
N/A
0 10
IL KS MD 40.00
VT Wl
4 JO
22 00
176 00
1 BO
12 60
PA VT 7 00
0 02
402 00
1039 00
478.00
1 10
0 02
36 70
N/A
NY WA 14 00
0 40

12 M
0 90

9 00

Median
Coriceii **** States with
(ppb) Detections
4 SO
123 00

1 40

0 90

9 00
0 10
N/A
0 10
0 SO

2 70
9 00
5 30
1 70
0 02
0 40
0 01
1 70
109 00
162 00
0 60
0 02
0 70
N/A
0 90
0 30

N/A
0 10

8 OO

CA
TX
ID
TX
AR CA FL KS NE NY PA



TX

AR KS re NY PA VT wi

ID
KS

ID
CA
NY

10

CA
ID
II)


WA
KS
CA

ID



Maximum
Concen
(ppb)

N/A
2 99
36 SO
0 23
99 90



585 00

1SOO 00

0 02
5 50

0 04
N/A
1 00

0 76

N/A
0 49
0 09


5./0
0.06
N/A

0 02



Median Maxim* Mail an
Concen '**• States with Concen Concen ««••
(ppb) Detections (ppb) (ppb)

N/A
2 85
0 93,
0 23
I 60



N/A

4 35

0 02
2 60

0 04
N/A
1 00

0 02

N/A
0 02
0 01


0 82
0 04
N/A

0 02

CT HI 290.00 5 30

KS MN 1 10 0 65
KS MN 22 00 1 OS

KS MN PA 4 03 0 55

MN JO 60 9 00

TX 100 00 IS 30

KS NE PA TX 107 20 2 J5


KS 17 00 2 80

KS 7 90 0 S3

NN 2 90 0 51
3C I 00 N/A



MN TX 0 B8 0 66
KS 0 26 0 18






KS 0 03 0 01



-------
                                                                      TABLE  3-5
                                          Confirmed Pesticides Detected in  Ground  Water Due to
                                             Agricultural Use and  Point-Source Contamination
                                                                     (continued)

Cam-el lei
(ir
Chemical Severely
Namv Restricted
Lindaite Y
l.i nut cxi
Malathion
MLTA
Nr-lrkMidophos
HPthumyl
Methyl parathion
Nelolachlor
rtett lUizin
Oxamyl
PTNB
PCP
Harathion
Piclordm
Promt! <» i
Propachlor
Propazine
Ell vex Y
SiMZine
Sulprofos
TUE Y
Toxaphene Y

Trial late
Tr.itlur.al in

Ajirtlyle
in
NPS ••

Y
Y



Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

Y

Y
Y

Y
Y
Y

Y



Y
Normal
Health 	
Advisory
l«vel •" States with
(ppb) Detections
0.026 «




17S
2 0
10
175
175

220

490
100

14
52
35

0 031



2 0
MS NJ SC
MI
MS

ME
NY
MS
CT 1A 1L PA Wl
IA IL KS WI
MA NY RI


ND
ME ND MI
TX

NE PA

CA CT MD NE NJ
1A
MS
MS


KS MD MS NE
Use ((.'aleyory

Maximum
Concen
(PI*))
4/ 00
2 10
53 00

10 50
9 00
256 00
32 30
6 80
395 00


0 04
49 00
29 60

0 20

PA VT 9.10
I 40
6 20
4910 00


2 20
5) Point Source

Median
Coiicen *'•• Stales with
(ppb) Detections
0 10
1 90
41 50

4 80
N/A
88 40
0 40
0 60
4 30


0 03
1 40
16 60

0 20

0 30
1 40
4 80
3205 00


0 40
ID

ID



ID
AR KS NY TX VT
KS

ID
ID

ND


KS
ID




i n
in
ND
(Category 6]

Maximum
Unknown Origin

Median Maximum Median
Concen Concen ••«* States with Concen Concen •
(Ppb)
0 08

5 20



0 01
112 00
2 10

0 72
0 05

3 56


2 50
0 62




0 13

0 03
(ppb) Detections (ppb) (ppb)
0 08

0 03



0 01
4 60
1 14

0 02
0 01

0 40


N/A
0 01




0 01

0 03



MN 2 20 0 26



KS MN PA 48 00 0 61
KS MN 1 05 0 23


MN MS 149 00 9 44

KS MN ND 12 80 3 40

m o 50 o 35


MN PA 3 40 0 72





KS 5 40 ' 09
   • Lifetime exposure levels based on a 10-6 risk of causing cancer


  •• National Pesticide Survey


 ••• Proposed Litetime Health Advisory Level


•••• Median of Uie concentration of positive detections for all confirmed studies   If a particular chemcal does not list multiple
    studies, thon the single study average is given   II  the data lias<> reports a single positive well,  than the average concentration

    reported for tliat well  is given

-------
                                               FIGURE 3-1
1
t_>
o
                         Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water

                                As a Result of Agricultural Practice

                                           Category 21 Category 5
                                                            «t d^ta of known poor quality or
                                               information except data 01
                                                   .^ source or.gin^^ to aj,ricllllMral UB.B.

                                          :  Only confirmed data a

-------
                                 TABLE 3-6
            National Assessments of Pesticides in Ground Water:
                             Current vs Prior
                             PRIOR ASSESSMENTS
Source
EPA/OPTS (1987)
Parsons & Witt (1988)
U. S. PIRG (1988)
No. Of
Pesticides
Detected
19
67
73
No. of
States with
Detected
Pesticides^
24
33
34
                               CURRENT ASSESSMENTS
Category
Description
  No. of
Pesticides
 Detected
   No. of
States with
  Detected
 Pesticides
        All data
                                77
                      39
        All data except suspected point         74
        sources or known poor quality.

        Suspected field use data excluding      65
        known poor quality.

        Confirmed, quality data of unknown      52
        or suspected field use origin.

        Confirmed, quality data of known or     46
        suspected field use origin.

        Confirmed, quality data of known or     32
        suspected point source origin.
                                                 38
                                                 36
                                                 27
                                                 26
                                                 12
                                 3-11

-------
u>
fsi
                                               FIGURE 3-2
                            Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water
                                  As a Result of Agricultural Practice
                                            (U.S. EPA/OPTS,  1987)
                                                                                       MASS 2

-------
                  FIGURE 3-3

Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water
              (Parsons & Uitt, 1988)

-------
                                         FIGURE 3-4
I
t-J
£-
                      Numbers of Pesticides Found in Ground Water

                            As a Result of Agricultural Pract.ee
                                        (U.S. PIRG, 1988)
•fMw*
AH
Z
MONT
8
WYO

COLO
1
NMEX
N DAK
•3
S OAK
• 3
N£B«
2

KANS
9

O
,-i 	 L ~ It*"
                                                                                 MASS,
                                            OKLA

-------
 collection and interpretation.   The assessment by the Agency shown in Figure
 3-2 (EPA/OPTS, 1987)  was based on a iruch smaller data base than the Agency
 currently has and incorporated a less  formal system for confirming the data
 then is presently being used by the Agency.  It is important to note that the
 1987 assessment reveals data from states that are not currently in category 5.
 This information will most likely be incorporated into category 5 once the
 formal data confirmations are complete.

      Differences between the current assessment (Figure 3-1) and that of
 Parsons and Witt (Figure 3-3)  are primarily based on how the data was
 collected.   Parsons and Witt based their study on a mail-in survey with lead
 state agencies.   EPA's current assessment has endeavored to obtain data from
 additional  agencies and sources,  differentiate the data based on origin of
 contamination, and collect additional  background information on the studies
 and the analytical technique used to quantify results.  The report by Parsons
 and Witt has not been formally released  at the time of this writing.

      U.S. PIRG produced their report in  September of 1988 using data from the
 public  docket.   During this time, EPA  has acquired additional monitoring
 results and confirmations on many of the studies.  Some of the data used by
 U.S.  PIRG has been superceded by updated reports.  Some of the detections
 credited as being caused by normal agricultural use have been verified as
 point-source contamination or the results of nonpesticidal use of chemicals.
 The report  was generated in a short time frame and as a result, sore chemicals
 have been counted twice and are represented by trade names as well as by their
 cannon  names.
3.4  About the
     The appendices  include additional  information on the data base.   Appendix
A outlines the structure and data elements  and discusses the confirmation
program.  Appendix A also provides guidance on interpreting the tables in the
subsequent appendices.

     Appendices B and C can be used to  identify the pesticides or states for
each assessment category in Tables 3-1  through 3-6.  Details on the detections
                                    3-15

-------
 can also be obtained here.  Appendix B lists positive detections  sorted by
 chemical and then by state.  Appendix C presents the same data sorted by state
 and then by chemical.  For each monitoring study reporting detections in
 ground water, these appendices present:  (a) the suspected or known source of
 contamination,  (b) the number of wells tested for each pesticide, (c) the
 number of positive wells found, (d) the number of samples taten,  (e) the
 number of positive samples, (f) the range of concentrations of the positives,
 (g)  the  average of all positive concentrations, and (h) the confirmation
 rating assigned to the results.  To the extent possible, the data in a study
 has  been itemized by origin of contamination and has been segregated down to
 the  county  level.

     Appendix D summarizes all data in the data base by chemical  including
 studies  for which no detections were noted.  For each assessment  category,  the
 appendix includes:  (a) total number of wells sampled, (b) the total number of
 positive wells, (c) the total number of samples taken, (d) the total number of
 positive samples, (e) the total number of states in which the chemical was
 sampled,  (f) the  number of states having positive detections, (g) the range of
 concentrations of all positive detections, and (h) the range of the average
 concentrations of the positives from the individual studies.

     It  is  important to note that this data reflects an automated sort by
 computer, and as  such certain anctnalies in the parameters may require
 explanation.  For example, if a particular author has presented his  results by
 wells and not by  samples, the study would not contribute to the sample totals
 presented in the  appendix.  As such, it is conceivable that the tables could
 present  a larger  number of wells than samples.  Also, the tables only reflect
 totals for studies that are identified as belonging to each respective
 assessment category and the statistical population may not be accurately
 represented.  For example, relating the number of positive wells  for a
 chemical to the total number of wells sampled can be misleading.   Therefore,
each value  in the appendix is not conclusive in  itself  and  it  is  important
 that the appendix is used cautiously with this taowledge in mind.

     Appendix E contains the bibliography  for the  studies in the data base.
Comments relative to the studies and/or confirmation process are also included
                                   3-16

-------
here.  Appendix F presents the full listing for each study in the data base
and is under separate cover.

     It should be noted that each study in the data base is referenced by a
five character identification code (e.g., "OTOOl" for Vermont study 001).
This code can be used to track each study given in Appendices B and c.  This
code can be used to obtain the formal reference for the study from Appendix  E
and the full data base listing of the study from Appendix F.  This code  is
also compatible with the filing system used in the public access docket.
                                   3-17

-------
                               4.0   CCNCLUSICNS

 4. i  Caveats QJQy§ing the Dafcg, Pasg

      Agricultural pesticides have been found in domestic drinking water wells
 at  levels of toxicological concern.  Ground-water contamination caused by
 pesticides can be the result of many factors including:  the physicochemical
 characteristics of the pesticide, frequency and rates of application, the
 hydrogeologic setting in which the chemical is used, the climatology of its
 use environment,  and other agronomic practices.

      Pinpointing the source of pesticide contamination is perhaps the most
 difficult parameter to confirm in the data base.  Contamination can result
 from causes other than leaching due to normal field applications.  These
 causes  include:   pesticide disposal, accidental spills, rinsate from equipment
 maintenance,  human error in dilution, intentional excess applications, back
 siphoning into a well during chemigation, or direct channelling of pesticides
 through poorly constructed or  damaged wells.  It is difficult to conclude with
 confidence that an incident of ground-water contamination is attributed to
 leaching  from normal agricultural use, unless the use histories near the site
 are known,  and point sources are ruled out.

      There are dangers in trying to use the data base to indicate the
 statistical significance of the problem on a national level.  Mast
 significantly is  the fact that many agricultural areas have not been sampled
 and are not statistically represented in the data.  In addition, data
 confirmations are not complete and many origins of contamination are unknown.

      It is  important to note that the studies in the data base have not been
 conducted and reported under a single standard protocol.  The studies were
 designed  and conducted by many different agencies for different purposes.
Many of the studies were only  designed to sample vulnerable ground water or  to
 investigate suspected problems, while other studies were designed to be
 statistically unbiased.   It is important to note that the studies have not
been  limited  to drinking water supplies and the studies have sampled many
types of wells including wells used only for observation or  irrigation.   Many
                                    4-1

-------
 of the studies have concentrated on shallow ground water which may not be
 representative of the drinking water sources of the area.  Many of the
 detections represent one sampling point in time which cannot measure the
 persistence of a problem.  As such, the results cannot be used to estimate
 human exposure to pesticides in drinking water from a national perspective.

      Because the studies were not conducted and reported with the data base in
 mind,  many of the data base elements have not been reported in the source
 documents.  Many but not all of these data holes are being resolved through
 the data confirmation program.  However, assessments made from the data  base
 can be difficult or inconclusive.  Statistics from the data base must be used
 carefully and with caution.  For example, statistically derived parameters
 based on the positives attributed to normal field use are suspect if the
 origin of the majority of positives are not known.  Similarly, the ratio of
 the number of well positives to the number of wells sampled cannot be
 determined reasonably if certain references include information on positives,
 but none on nondetections.  Biases in the design of studies, and where they
 have been conducted to date, also influence statistical assessments.

     For these reasons, derived parameters cor^iperi ]n the report and in the
           -ho i  be treated  s '''cors rather  hai  iolute values.
4. 2  Major Data Gaps

     There are approximately 130 reports entered in the data base
(representing approximately 150 different monitoring studies).  To date, 50
percent of these reports have been confirmed, and roughly 20 percent of all
entries have unknown origins.  This accounts for the range  in values in
categories 2 and 5.  Tto date, nearly 70 percent of the reports  incorporated
into the data base by April 1988 have been confirmed.

     Difficulties exist in undertaking this kind of a confirmation program.
The Agency is at the mercy of the schedules, cooperation, and ability  of  each
study director to confirm their results.  Some studies cannot be confirmed
because details on the study are not retained in records.   Particular  states
for which significant data confirmations are pending  include:   Florida,
                                    4-2

-------
Hawaii, Minnesota, New York,  Virginia,  and Wisconsin.  Ackiitional fiatg gaps
include the following:

    •  USGS observations wells.   USGS routinely monitors for select pesticides
       in their ground-water  quality monitoring network.  These results are
       maintained in the Survey's WATSTCRE data base and periodically
       transferred to EPA's STCfcET data base.   The Survey adheres to a quality
       control program on data entered into WATSTCRE.  This data has not been
       given the highest priority in EPA's Pesticides  in Ground Water Data
       Base primarily because the origin of contamination for detections are
       difficult to assess.

    •  Aldicarb.   The confirmation for many of  the aldicarb monitoring
       programs has not been  completed.  Many monitoring studies have been
       conducted for aldicarb in ground water from the late 1970's until the
       present and the volume of this data is overwhelming.  This data
       accounts for several of the locations where pesticides have been
       detected in Figure 3-2 but not in category 5 of Figure 3-1.

       Rhone-Poulenc Ag.  company maintains a computerized, data base on ground-
       water monitoring results  from studies that they have conducted.  Their
       studies have been limited to drinking water sources and the origin of
       positive detections have  generally been  attributed to nonpoint sources.
       We are coordinating Rhone-Poulenc to verify that the Agency's data is
       comprehensive and confirmed.

    •  Atragine.   Ciba-Geigy  corporation has developed a data base containing
       monitoring for atrazine in ground water.  Their data base  is
       attributing roughly 75 and 90 percent of detections of atrazine in
       ground water in the United States and Canada,, respectively, to point-
       source origins.   ciba-Geigy is cooperating with the Agency to resolve
       discrepancies between  both data bases.

    •  California.   The California Department of Food  and Agriculture  (CDFA)
       has developed an excellent statewide well inventory and data base on
       pesticides in ground water.   EPA is using this  data base  as the
       principal  source for data in California.  While their computer data
       base has not been fully merged into EPA's data  base, the  results
       presented herein have  been obtained from published reports (Brown,
       et.al,  1986; Ames, et.al, 1987).  Chemical names and  information on the
       number of  positive wells  and samples have been  obtained from the 1986
       report,  however, details  on the concentrations  were not documented in
       the report.   Confirmed data attributed to agricultural and point source
       origins have been obtained from the 1987 report.  Since many of the
       same wells sampled and reported in the 1987 update had been reported
       but not distinguished  in  the 1986 report, the 1987 data has not been
       entered into EPA's data base in order to avoid  duplicating wells.
       Concentrations and total  well counts will be  obtained directly from
       CDFA's  computer  data base and incorporated  into EPA's data base in the
       future.
                                    4-3

-------
 4.3  Discussion an the Results

     Fran the data received to date, the precise representation of pesticide
 residues in ground water, as a result of normal agricultural application,  is
 probably greater than category 5.  This is because many of the studies have
 yet to be confirmed and many of the unknown sources may have been caused by
 normal agricultural practices.  In addition, many agricultural areas have  not
 been sampled.  Given the right conditions, nearly every chemical has the
 potential to leach to ground water.  However, it is iinportant to note that one
 or two detections of a pesticide at trace levels may not in and of themselves
 indicate a problem.  But, a pesticide detected at numerous locations at
 concentrations equal to or greater than Health Advisory levels is reason for
 concern and further investigation.  Therefore, it is critical to look at both
 the frequency of detections and their concentrations, and how those
 concentrations compare to established and proposed health numbers for a
 specific pesticide.

     Table 3-5 illustrates that from normal use, 18 pesticides nave been
 confirmed in ground water at levels equal to or above established or proposed
 Health Advisory levels.  It is important to note that all of these pesticides
 are on the list of analytes being screened as part of the Agency's National
 Pesticide survey.

     From Table 3-6, it would appear that an increasing number of pesticides
 are contaminating ground water.  However, Table 3-6 is better explained by the
 fact that more people are looking for pesticides in ground water  and these
 results reflect increased monitoring efforts.  Awareness of the issue has  led
 to voluntary and mandatory restrictions of many of the more toxic ,  persistent ,
 and mobile chemicals, such as EOT an EBCP.  As illustrated in Table 3-5, seven
of the pesticides having detections in excess of Health Advisory  levels have
 either been cancelled or have had their use severely restricted.
4.4  future Uses of the pgta bv EKV

     The data base will be used by the Agency as a tool to supplement the
pesticide registration process.   It is currently being used to target
                                  4-4

-------
pesticides that are contaminating ground water inorder to establish priority
candidates for regulation to mitigate such problems.  The data base is being
used to help pinpoint the migration pathways and environmental factors
associated with contamination which are the first steps in developing
mitigation strategies.  By overlaying pesticide monitoring results with
pesticide use data and hydrogeoglogic factors, it will be possible to
highlight vulnerable areas that are candidates for reduced or altered
application  and to depict data gaps where additional monitoring should be
conducted.   In addition, the data base can be used in support of the
reregistration of a pesticide for which ground-water contamination has not
been shown to be a problem.

     The importance given to the data base to supplement the regulatory
process will increase as the data base evolves.  The data base is in a dynamic
state of development; confirmations on the data presently entered in the data
base continue and additional monitoring studies are received periodically.
Many states and pesticide registrants have ongoing ground-^water monitoring
programs and other states and registrants are either implementing or expanding
monitoring efforts.  Tnese studies will provide additional information on the
sources and  impacts of pesticide residues in ground water.  The results and
conclusions contained herein are interim and will be updated as further
information is collected and processed.
                                  4-5

-------
                               5.0   REFERENCES
 Ames,  M. ,  C. Cardozo,  S. Nicosia, J. Troiano, s. Monk, S. Auli, and S.  Brown,
 "Sampling  for  Pesticide Residues in California Well Water: 1987 Update, Well
 Inventory  Data Base",  Second Annual Report to the Legislature, State
 Department of  Health Services, and state Water Resources Control Board, State
 of California, Department of Food and Agriculture, Division of Pesticide
 Management, December 1, 1987.

 Brown  M. ,  C. Cardozo,  S. Nicosia, J. Troiano, and S. Ali, "Sampling for
 Pesticide  Residues in  California Well Water:  1986 Well Inventory Data Base",
 First  Annual Report to the Legislature, State Department of Health Services,
 and State  Water Resources Control Board, State of California, Department of
 Food and Agriculture,  Division of Pesticide Management, December 1, 1986.

 Cohen, S.Z. , C. Eiden, and M.N. Lorber, "Monitoring Ground Water for
 Pesticides", in Evaluation of Pesticides in Ground Water f ACS Symposium Series
 #315,  W.Y. Garner, R.C. Honeycutt, and H.N. Nigg, ed. , American Chemical
 Society, Washington, D.C. , 1986.

 Cohen, S.Z., S.M. Creeger, R.F. Carsel, and C.G. Enfiel, "Potential for
 Pesticide  Contamination of Groundwater from Agricultural Uses" in Treatment
 and Disposal of Pesticide Wastes . ACS Symposium Series #259, R.F. Krueger and
 J.N. seiber, ed. , American Chemical society, Washington, D.C., 1984.
Farm Chemicals HaTdboofr , Meister Publishing Co. , Willoughby Ohio, 1987.

Hind, Rick and Eliza Evans, "Pesticides in Ground Water:  EPA Files Reveal Tip
of Deadly Iceberg", U.S. Public Interest Research Group, September, 1988.
Holden, Patrick W. , Pesticides and Groundwater polity: Issues and Problems in
Four States f National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. , 1986.

Parsons, Douglas W. and James M. Witt, "Pesticides in Groundwater in the
United States of America: A Report of a 1988 Survey of State Lead Agencies" ,
Oregon State University, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Corvallis
Oregon, June 15, 1988 (Draft).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides and Toxic
Substances, "Agricultural Chemicals in Ground Water: Proposed Pesticide
Strategy",  Washington, D.C. , December 1987.
                                    5-1

-------
f;
 !*•
 I-
  Si

-------

-------
            AFFEJSDIX A
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INPORMKTICN

-------
                                 APPENDIX A
                     PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
Background

     The Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base is a compilation of ground-water
monitoring efforts reported in the literature or obtained through direct
correspondence to the Agency.  The data base has been developed by the Ground-
Water Section of the Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate &
Effects Division, Environmental Fate & Ground-Water Branch (EFED/EFGWB).

     Structurally, the data base consists of three data bases:   1)
Bibliographical Data Base, 2) Study Area Data Base, and 3) Pesticide
Monitoring Data Base.  The Bibliographical Data Base contains information on
the reference for bookkeeping purposes (e.g. reference identification number,
author, date of publication, date entered into data base, etc.).   Often
publications win report the results fron several monitoring studies.  To the
extent possible, separate studies or monitoring sites are distinguished in the
Study Area (or Sub-reference) Data Base which contains site and study specific
information on the sampling program (e.g., location, sampling period, etc.).
The Pesticide Monitoring Data Base contains a summary of monitoring results
for each pesticide in each study or sub-reference.

     The data base is programmed under Ashton Tate's dBASE III Plus.  A sample
listing from the data base is given in Attachment A-l.  Elements (data fields)
of each data base are given below:

     1.   Bibliographical data base
            Filing reference number
            Date entered into data base
            Principle author
            Date of publication or reference
            Confidentiality
            Full reference
            Additional comments

     2.   study area / sub-reference database
            Sub-reference number
            State for which data is reported
            county for which data is reported
            Type of well monitored (e.g. domestic use, irrigation)
            Period of sampling
            Additional comments

     3.   Pesticide monitoring data base
            Pesticide tested for
            Suspected origin of pesticide (e.g., point source, normal  use)
            Number of wells tested / number of positive wells  found
            Number of samples tested / number of positive samples  found
            Lowest concentration found
            Highest concentration found
            Average concentration of positives
            Confirmation code
            Additional comments
                                         A-l

-------
 Interpreting Data Base Listings

 The following information can aid in interpreting the data in the data base.

     •  Data base codes are given in Attachment A-2.

     •  Pesticides are entered by common name pursuant to the Farm Chemicals
                 (1987) .
     •  Compounds presented as pesticides in the reference,  but not identified
        as such in the Farm Chemicals Handbook have been included in the data
        base.  These compounds are presently being verified.

     •  Some compounds (e.g. , trichloroethylene) have uses in addition to
        agricultural uses, and when known, non-agricultural origins have not
        been included.

     •  Pesticide metabolites have been entered separately if the metabolite
        is common to more than one active ingredient and the source pesticide
        is not known.

Additional footnotes on the data base are given in Attachment A- 3.

Caveats in Using the Data

     All assessments made from the data base must be approached with the
cautions inherent in the nature of the source documents.  The monitoring
studies have been conducted by numerous individuals and agencies and have not
been exposed to a regimental protocol or consistent levels of quality control.

Specific notes or limitations of the data base are listed below:

     •  The reference sources have been subjected to manual screening in
        order to reduce data into the data base format.

     •  The data base does not represent a comprehensive assessment of ground
        water contamination by pesticides, nor does it claim to contain a
        comprehensive compilation of monitoring efforts.  The data base
        contains ground-water monitoring results collected to date from
        federal and state agencies as well as universities and chemical
        manufacturers.  The data base is in a developmental state and new
        studies are artfled to it daily.

     •  Many of the references in the data base are incomplete, or  rather,
        not all elements of EFED/EFGWB's data base are contained  in each
        reference.  For example, a reference may report the number  of
        positive findings of pesticides  in a sampling program without  an
        indication of the sampling arena  (number of wells or  number of
        samples taken) .  Quite often references will cite  results by wells
        and not by samples or vice versa.  Some references do not indicate
        the origin or suspected origin of the  finding  (e.g. ,  normal use vs.
        point source) .  Other references do not specify the county in which
        the positive was found.  Also, there can be overlap between
                                     A-2

-------
         references  that cannot be distinguished, and therefore, seme data may
         be  entered  twice - erroneously but unknowingly.

     •   It  is  important to note that detected positives may not have been
         confirmed for all studies contained  in the data base.  Efforts are
         being  taken to verify these entries.

Confirmation Program

     To  conqpensate  for these limi tat ions, EFED/EF(3
-------
                                                           ATTACHMENT A-l
                                                    SAMPLE DATA  BASE  LISTING
                                      U S  EPA/OPP PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE

                                                  BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INFORMATION
     Ref
    Number
                             Full  Reference
                                                                                         Comments
    C0001  Miller,  M P ,  E P   Savage, D.D  Adrian,  M J  Aaronson,   Information confirmed by  E  P  Savage. Colorado state
           T J  Keefe,  D  H Hamar, and J T  Tessaci, "Gcoundwatec   University on August 9, 1988 with a telephone conversation
           Transport of the Herbicide Atrazine, weld County,        with Douglas W  Parsons
           Colorado",  Colorado State University Institute o£  Rural
           Environmental  Health and Dept  of Pathology,  and
           Louisiana State University Dept  o£ Civil Engineering,
           1987
                                              MONITORING STUDY/LOCATION INFORMATION
  Pe£   Sub-Ref
  No    Number  State
                            County
                 Type of
                   well
Sampling
 Period
                                                                                           Comments
  C0001
              1  CO    Weld
                                          OBS
                              07/85 - 11/85 Site conditions    irrigated corn
                                                      PESTICIDE INFORMATION
No
            Pesticide
Sub       County Susp   Wells      Sa
Ref State  FIPS  Origin  No  / Pos   'to
               U3W     High    Mean   Confirm
              ippb)    (ppb)   (ppto)  Rating
                                                                                                                   Comments
COOCi  Atrazine
                             I   CO     12J    NFU     44
                                                                           0 00      2  JO     1 00     1
                                                            A-4

-------
                           AITftCHMETJT A-2
                          EKCA ERSE CODES

 •  State names are specified according to the two-letter state and
    territorial abbreviations issued by the U.S. Postal Service.

 •  County names are entered by the Federal Information Processing System
    (FIPS) codes.

    A. code of "B"  in the  County FIPS code indicates positives are not
    broken out by county  and further explanation is given in the conment
    field of the Monitori-ng  study/Location data base.  A code of "C"
    indicates that the county is explained in the Garments of the
    Pesticide Information data base.   If the "B" or "C" is preceded by a
    number, the number represents the  number of counties surveyed.

 •  Origins of contamination are indicated by the following abbreviations:

    - NFU  = known normal field use,
    - SFTJ  = suspected field use,
    - PS    = known point  source,
    - SPS  = suspected point source,
    - DC    = known direct channelling  to well (e.g., back siphon),
    - SDC  = suspected direct channelling to well,
    - BOTH = suspected normal field use and suspected point source, and
    - N/A  = origin not identified.

 •  The type of well  is indicated by the following abbreviations:

    - DCM = private domestic well,
    - PWS = public water  supply,
    - IRR = irrigation well,
  •  - LVS = livestock,
    - CBS = observation well,
    - IND = industrial use well, and
    - N/A = type of well  not identified.

• Data  confirmation is  indicated by  a code of 1 through 5 in which "1"
    is very confident, subsequently "5" is poor quality data.  A code of
    "0" indicates  that the confirmation has not yet been completed for
   that  entry.

   Studies documenting superior quality control programs (e.g., sample
   handling,  replicate samples, multiple laboratory analyses, analytical
   methods,  second-column confirmation) are assigned a rating of  "1".   If
   the documentation on  one or two points are weak, but otherwise
   adequate precautions  are taken to  ensure the validity of  results, a
   code  of "2"  is assigned.  Generally,  if second column confirmations
   were  unacceptable, studies were assigned ratings of "3",  "4",  or "5"
   depending on conditions  used in obtaining results.

•  Entries  of  "N/A"  or "-9" indicate  that the  information  is not known
    (for  character and numeric fields, respectively).
                                   A-5

-------
                               ATTACHMENT A-3
                             CPOA EftSE FOOTNOTES

1) Pesticides are entered by common name pursuant to "Farm Chemicals
   Handbook".   See partial list given below for chemicals with several most
   CCIIIILJII names.

   CHEMICAL                 DMA Eg^SE NWE

   1 , 2-Dichloropropane      1 , 2-D
   1 , 3-Dichloropropene      l , 3-D
   Dacthal                  DCPA
   DDD                      IDE
   DDVP                     Dichlorvos
   Eptam                    EPIC
   Ethylene dichloride      EEC
   Ethylene dibromide       ECB
   Ethylene thiourea        EIU
   Folex                    Merphos
   ganrna-BHC                Lindane
   Gutnion                  Azinphos-methyl
   Kepone                   Chlordecone
   Methiocarb               Mercaptcdimethur
   Parathion                Ethyl parathion
   PCP                      Pentachlorophenol
   Tedion                   Tetradifon
   Telone                   1,3-D
   Trithion                 Carbophenothion

2) Specific pesticides are not identified by monitoring study:

   Bleep (atrazine/tnetolachlor mixture)
   Carbamate screen
   Chlorinated hydrocarbon screen
   D-D (mixture of chlorinated hydrocarbons incl. 1,2-D and 1,3-D)
   Dithiccarbamates
   Organochlorine screen
   Organophosphate screen
   Triazine screen

3) ChemicaJ. may have uses other than pesticides and origin of  positives
   are not identified.  See list given below.

   PESTICIDES W/ OIHER USES
   Arochlor (a PCB)         Transformer  fluids, pesticide use to reduce
                            vapor pressure

   Benzene                  Industrial solvent, degreaser, Insect fumigant

   Carbon tetrachloride     Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant

   Creosote                 Wood preservative
                                    A-6

-------
   Ethyl alcohol

   Ethylene dichloride

   Formaldehyde

   Hexachlorobenzene

   Methylene chloride

   2-Napthol



   PCS


   Phthalates:
        Dibutyl (IBP)

        Diethyl
        Dimethyl  (EMP)

        Dioctyl (DOP)

        Diphenyl  (Biphenyl)


   Tetrachloroethylene


   Toluene

   1,1,1 Trichloroethane

   Tr ichloroethylene


   Xylene
   ATTACHMENT «-3
 DMA BASE POCmsDTES
     (continued)

Doubtful nonral field use

Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant

Doubtful normal field use.   Seed treatment.

Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant

Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant

Normal field use questionable. Used as wood
preservative for scabies in humans, and moth
larvae in orchards on treated paper strips

Doubtful normal field use.  Was used w/
pesticides to reduce vapor pressure.


Cannon contaminant frcm sampling tubing. Insect
repellent.
Cannon contaminant from sampling tubing.
Cannon contaminant from sanpling tubing. Insect
repellent (discontinued).
Cannon contaminant from sanpling tubing. Orchard
acaricide.
Cannon contaminant from sampling tubing.
Fungicide.

Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant,
grain protectant.

Organic solvent

Dry cleaning solvent, degreaser, fumigant.

Industrial solvent, degreaser, insect fumigant,
grain protectant.

Pesticide solvent.
4. Particular metabolites have been referenced  in studies.  Where known,  these
   have been listed by their parent and qualified in the comment  field of the
   database.  These include the following:

                                               : ENTRY
   Aldicarb sulfoxide
   Aldicarb sulfone
          Aldicarb
          Aldicarb
                                  A-7

-------
                                           - 3
                             DMA BASE FOOTNOTES
                                 (continued)

   OUorallyl alcohol                 As degradate (parent unknown:   1,3-
                                      Dichioropropene ,  others)
   2 , 4-Dichlobenzoic acid             As degradate (parent unknown:   2,4-D,
                                      others)
   COD                                EOT
   DDE                                DDT
   DDA                                DDT
   Diazoxon                           Diazinon
   Endrin aldehyde                    Endrin
   Endosulfan sulfate                 Endosulfan
   Ethyl paraoxon                     Ethyl parathion
   ETU                                As degradate (parent unknown:   Maneb,
                                      Mancozeb)
   Fenamiphos sulfone                 Fenamiphos
   Fenamiphos sulf oxide               Fenazniphos
   Heptachlor epoxide                 Heptachlor
   Malaoxon                           Oxygen analog of Malathion
   Methyl paraoxon                    Methyl parathion
   Molinate sulfoxide                 MDlinate
   Thiobencarb sulfoxide              Thiobencarb

5) Chenucals have been identified as pesticides but are not included in the
   "Farm Chemicals Handbook" or the "Catalog of Pesticide Names and Their
   Synonyms".  See list below.

   CHEMICAL AS ENTERED TfJ ifflyfiftFE    EXPUWKFLOK OR
   1-Napthol                          2,Napthol or Ufapthaleneactic acid?
   CDED                               Related to CDEA & CDSC herbicides?
   Carbonphencjxon                     Degradate of cau±onphenothion?
   Para-Nitropftenol                   Doubtful pesticide use
   Ronnoxon                           Metabolite of Ronnel?
   Nonachlor                          Ingredient of chlordane
   Cxychlordane                       Metabolite of chlordane
   PCN                                PCNB?
                                    A-8

-------
                                   ATTACHMENT A-4
                           DMA CCNFISMftTICN QUESTICMAIBE

      Quality Assurance Questionnaire for pesticides in Ground water
 CONTACT INFORMATION
 Name:	 Title: 	
 Organization:	
 Street Address:
 City,  State,  Zip  Code:
 Phone  Number:  	
 REFERENCE INFORMATION
 Principal Author:  	
 Publication  Title:
 CONFIRMATION  INFORMATION
 A)  Purpose of monitoring  study: 	
 B)   Sample Handling:  (condition of  storage and transport, time between
 collection and analysis  of  sample,  etc.)
O  Analytical Method:   	
D)  Detection Limit  (range):  	  S/N  =  	  99%
E)  Reporting Limit  (range):  	
F)  Range of Means of  Recoveries:  	
G)  Coefficient of Variation  of  Method:
H)  Confirmation method:
I)  Were duplicate samples  analyzed by another laboratory?   YES  or  NO
J)  If yes for  I, were  the  results comparable?    YES  or  NO
K)  Was stability of the  analytes  under storage conditions determined?

L)  If stability was determined, which analytes degraded significantly:
M)  Have these results  been  reported in another study: 	
N)  How confident are you  in the results,  rating where 1 = Very Confident,
subsequently 5 = No Confidence (please circle)    12345
For EPA use only
Reference Number:
                                       A-9

-------
            APPQCIIX B
POSITIVE EOTRIES SCRIED BY CHEMICAL

-------
PACE
                                      PESTICIDES tN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BV STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE
FIPS NU>SER
CHEMICAL I
CA 3
CA 015
CA 049
CT 007
CT 003
CT 003
CT 003
CT 013
CT 009
CT 007
CT SB
HI N/A
HI 009
MA B
MD 045
MD N/A
NY 103
NY 103
CHEMICAL 1
HI N/A
•JY 103
NY 103
NY 103
CHEMICAL 2
KS 201
VM 70B
TX 093
'/A 28
CHEMICAL 2,
CT 98
Ft, 025
FL 099
HI N/A
M! N/A
:A 021
:D :B

-------
  PESTICIDES IN GROUND  »flVTER DATA BASE
POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY  CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE SUB-REF
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
KS 201
MA 001
«N 'CB
•4S 10B
MT 099
MT 111
MY 4B
NY 198
SO B
i/A 2B
CHEMICAL 2
TX 093
CHEMICAL 2,
MA 001
KSOOl
MA002
MNC02
ySCOl
MT001
MTC01
NY003
NY010
SCOOl
VA002
,4-DB
TX003
4-Dichlobenroic
MA002
2
1
2
1
5
6
1
{
1
1

1
acid
1
ORIGIN
N/A
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
-9
NFU
SFU

DC

NFU
WELLS
NO / POS
1 /
17 /
400 /
143 /
13 /
10 /
51 /
48 /
-9 /
66 /

75 /

17 /
I
1
7
2
4
I
4
2
-9
14

1

10
SAMPLES
NO / POS
I /
60 /
525 /
143 /
50 /
U /
51 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

80 /

60 /
y
i
12
2
5
^
4
-9
-9
-9

1

21
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00
0 00
0 07
7 90
0 11
0 00
0 50
0 20
0 29
-9 00

0 00

0 21
MAXIMUM
1 30
0 J4
5 70
49 50
0 J9
1 10
0 56
0 50
0 30
-9 00

0 23

32 00
MEAN
I 30
0 34
0 22
2 70
0 23
1 70
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

0 23

4 29
:ONF!RM
RATING
I
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

1

0
CHEMICAL Alachloc
AR N/A
CA 8
CT 98
rL B
FL 5B
tA 043
:A 065
r.A 067
IA 131
[A 035
[A
IA 091
I A 091
n SB
a s
IN 98
.KS 103
KS 133

-------
=>AG£  3
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND MATER DATA 3ASE
                                     POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE COUNTY
FIPS
MD
ME
MN
MN
MD
ME
NE
ME
ME
NE
ME
NE
MY
MY
MY
PA
PA
PA
3D
VA
WI
•II
WI
033

358
7OB
021
4B
12B
12B
047
107
179
037
083
103
19B
2B
B
B
9
2B
N/A
B
B
REFERENCE
NUMBER
MD004
ME002
MN002
MNOC2
ND004
NE001
NE002
NE002
NE003
NE005
NEOOS
NE005
NY004
NY009
NY010
PA001
PA003
PA004
SD001
VA002
WI001
wrooj
WI006
SUB-REF
NUMBER
1
1
I
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ORIGIN
NFU
SFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
PS
N/A
-9
N/A
NFU
SPS
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
WELLS
NO /
15 /
38 /
100 /
400 /
95 /
47 /
14 /
17 /
451 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
17 /
-9 /
48 /
43 /
53 /
58 /
-9 /
66 /
26 /
42 /
733 /
PCS
L5
[
8
8
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
15
-9
L
5
6
5
-9
0
I
9
60
SAMPLES
NO / POS
107 /
159 /
400 /
525 /
171 /
47 /
14 /
34 /
451 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
58 /
36 /
-9 /
129 /
121 /
193 /
-9 /
-9 /
26 /
147 /
733 /
20
1
9
14
3
1
2
2
1
I
1
1
42
1
-9
10
8
5
-9
-9
1
30
60
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
0 00
0 00
0 16
0 07
0 20
0 01
0 02
0 OL
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 04
0 00
0 80
0 05
0 10
0 08
0 36
-9 00
0 00
0 10
0 40
MAXIMUM
1 00
0 19
2 81
4 03
1 20
0 02
0 07
0 07
0 82
0 95
2 96
20 60
16 00
0 80
0 80
3 00
1 30
20 00
6 70
-9 00
1 00
113 00
3000 00
(PPB)
MEAN
0 33
0 19
0 37
0 44
0 33
0 01.
0 04
0 04
0 82
0 95
2 96
20 60
1 78
0 80
0 80
0 77
0 59
4 70
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
19 60
54 40
CONFIRM
RATING
1
2
1
1
0
I
1
i
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
:HEMICAL Aidicarb
AX
AL
Al
A2
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
FL
FL
FL
FL
CL
CL
CT
FL
FL
FL
031
083
003
28
2B
9
a
015
015

019
9
069
5B
055
127
127
057
055
OS7
057
US900
US902
US902
US900
US900
CA001
CA001
CA901
CA903
CA904
CA90S
FL004
FL006
FU»7
FL901
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
2
1
1
3
18
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
6
7
7
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
(*U
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
4 /
34 /
19 /
4 /
2 /
481 /
3 /
40 /
22 /
27 /
5 /
783 /
3 /
14 /
44 /
2 /
T '
•> /
45 /
2 /
3 /
I
1
1
1
2
30
1
24
17
12
2
9
0
1
32
-i
?
5
33
1
2
-9 /
35 /
20 /
-9 /
2 /
797 /
3 /
450 /
72 /
433 /
57 /
784 /
-9 /
14 /
120 /
41 /
LOO /
<« /
194 /
6 /
26 /
-9
I
2
-9
2
225
I
318
63
108
17
10
-9
1
85
21
62
56
U3
1
19
0 00
0 00
5 00
0 00
2 50
-9 00
-9 00
0 00
0 00
I 00
1 00
2 00
-9 00
0 00
1 00
I 00
1 00
I 00
1 00
0 00
3 00
31 00
1 00
7 00
6 00
16 00
-9 00
-9 00
47 00
44 00
78 00
93 00
27 00
-9 00
1 65
4.16 00
6 00
350 00
235 00
415 00
2 00
36 00
-9 00
1 00
6 00
-9 00
9 30
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
10 00
12 20
18 50
7 20
-9 00
1 65
47 90
3 14
54 11
66 40
43 38
2 00
10 20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                    B-3

-------
PACE  4
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS 9¥ CHEKICM. BY OTkTE
STATE
FL
^L
FL
FL
FL
FL
fTT
FL
FL
OA
CA
:o
MS
MA
MS
MS
MR
ME
ME
ME
ME
MN
*T
MT
NC
NC
NC
HC
fJE
NJ
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
MY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
ft
fi
"#
q^
01
o I
SC
COUNTY
FIPS
069
4B
095
127
127
105
4B
057
5B
177
205
Oil
B
SB
SB
68

OOJ
019
2B
00 J
35B
Ul
009
38
38
131
2B

28
3B
3B
103
IQJ
101
117
019
033
029
103
117
117
059
:o9
18
2B
049
REFERENCE
NUMBER
FL902
F1903
FL903
FL9C J
FL9C3
FL905
US900
US900
L'S901
US902
US902
U5902
MA001
MA901
MA901
MA.9Q1
MA902
ME901
ME90I
ME902
•JS900
MN002
MT001
MT001
NC901
NC901
'JS900
'JS901
NE901
NJ901
NJ902
NJ902
NY002
NY009
NY901
NV901
NY901
NY901
MY9QI
NY902
NY903
US900
US900
RF901
51902
RI902
JS900
SUB-REF
NUMBER
9
3
4
5
6
1
5
6
2
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
i
I
U
i
6
3
!
1
15
3
I
I
I
1
2
I
1
I
1
1
\
1
1
14
7
I
i
1
16
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
NPJ
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WTi
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFXJ
NFXJ
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
sni
*TJ
rru
HFU
MFW
NFU
HFU
MFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
WEL
NO /
3 /
252 /
7 /
19 /
4 /
172 /
8 /
J /
17 /
23 /
7 /
23 /
146 /
52 /
162 /
84 /
22 /
98 /
47 /
48 /
4 /
21 /
16 /
U /
18 /
32 /
2 /
19 /
15 /
46 /
3 /
6 /
-9 /
-9 /
28 /
9 /
2 /
U /
16 /
170 /
25 /
4 /
I /
11 /
474 /
212 /
2 /
LS
PQS
j
2
I
3
j
95
4
1
2
2
1
1
59
16
41
U
12
194
28
20
3
2
1
6
j
5
2
i
i_
2
2
1
2
-9
3

2
5
3
122
i 2
1
L
-1
S2
48
2
SAMPLES
HO • POS
24 /
252 /
10 /
42 /
5 /
JJ46 /
15 /
3 /
48 /
y-. /
s /
23 /
146 /
S3 /
190 /
117 /
131 /
283 /
125 /
48 /
4 /
54 /
17 /
25 /
18 /
90 /
2 /
19 /
tu /
68 /
3 /
6 /
-9 /
34000 /
28 /
9 /
2 /
U /
18 /
5 ' 0 '
219 /
4 /
, /
s2 /
493 /
214 /
1 /
15
2
3
6
4
828
5
I
j
j


59
-9
-9
-9
•y-j
i. !
516
39
20
3
5
2
10
J
3
2
[
I
4
2
I
2
0
3
I
2
5
10
270
30
I
1
21
-9
-9
2
CONCENTRATIONS (PFB)
MINIMUM
I 00
5 00
4 00
I 00
15 00
0 00
0 50
0 00
1 00
2 00
0 00
o oo
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
0 00
2 00
1 00
0 50
-9 00
0 00
1 50
1 00
0 50
0 00
0 00
3 10
4 00
0 00
-9 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
5 00
2 00
2 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
-9 00
9 00
1 00
1 00
0 50
MAXIMUM
4 00
19 00
6 00
*> 30
13C 00
1264 00
S 00
375 00
I 00
8 00
I 00
2 00
44 20
41 10
60 00
27 00
23 00
77 00
59 00
14 00
23 00
30 60
-9 00
2 90
1 50
28.20
0 50
2 00
3 00
31 00
50 00
3 00
-9 00
315 00
2 00
2 00
6 00
30 00
32 00
217 00
tit 00
I 00
0 50
148 00
73 00
17 00
1 00
MEAN
2 47
12 50
5 00
2 90
S3 50
-9 00
2 30
-9 00
1 00
4 00
1 00
2 00
-9 00
21 10
U 60
10 20
7 40
-9 00
-9 00
7 20
14 70
9 OO
-9 00
i 12
1 50
3 90
0 SO
2 00
i 00
14 30
27 00
3 00
-9 00
IB 30
1 30
2 00
5 50
9 80
9 20
3J 20
25 40
t 00
0 50
64 57
-9 00
-9 00
0 75
CONFIRM
RATING
0
0
0
0
o
0
V
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
i
1
0
0
0
5
0
0
5

3
3
3
3
3
5
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
                                                     B-4

-------
PAGE
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL  BY STATE
STATE
3C
sc
X
TX
VA
VA
•/A
WA
WI
W!
wi
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
wr
WI
WI
wr
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
wr
WI
cownf
FIPS
027
075
333
3B
2B
'301
38
23
2B
097
98
2B
N/A
8
22B
228
228
228
228
228
228
22B
228
22B
228
228
228
N/A
98
9B
9B
98
98
96
98
98
98

137
137
REFERENCE
NUMBER
US902
'JS9Q2
'JS902
'JS900
US900
•JS901
US901
'JS900
US900
US901
US901
US901
WI001
WIOOJ
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI90L
WI901
W£901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI902
WI90J
WI90J
WI903
WI903
WI903
WI90J
WI90J
WI90J
WI903
MI904
WI905
WI90S
SUB-REF
NUMBER
1
1
1
9
10
6
7
3
11
1
4
5
1
1
I
1
1
i.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
i
1
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
1
1
l
l
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
MF'J
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
.NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO /
3 /
13 /
13 /
6 /
i /
9 /
69 /
2 /
16 /
138 /
169 /
20 /
S3 /
35 /
72 /
58 /
5 /
26 /
98 /
73 /
421 /
3 /
8 /
2 /
58 /
27 /
116 /
176 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
16 /
2 /
I /
PQS
2
L
I
6
4
4
12
1
16
34
23
u
33
28
a
13
i
6
9
15
102
1
I
L
10
5
62
103
14
1
2
11
6
I
5
3
40
6
2
\
SAHPLES
NO / PCS
10 / 3
L4 / 2
14 / 1
6 / 6
7 / 4
26 / U
69 / 12
2 / 1
31 / 28
218 / 39
235 / 31
82 / 22
S3 / 33
190 / 102
133 / 27
125 / 57
7 / 1
68 / 28
153 / 35
141 / 59
971 /457Q
6 / 1
9 / 1
4 / I
106 / 39
47 / 14
534 /4220
3300 / 393
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
9 / -9
16 / 6
H / 7
7 / 5
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
1 00
3 00
0 00
1 00
0 50
I 00
1 00
0 00
0 50
-9 00
1 00
1 00
I 00
1 00
I 00
1 00
0 00
2 00
I 00
I 00
1 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
I 00
2 00
I 00
1 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
4 00
8 00
HAXIWJM
2 00
4 00
3 00
2 00
1 00
20 00
8 00
I 00
10 00
85 00
111 00
38 00
10 00
no oo
20 00
10 00
1 00
52 00
12 00
62 00
111 00
1 00
25 00
1 00
7 00
3J 00
72 00
221 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
8 00
36 00
144 00
(PPB)
MEAN
1 67
3 50
3 00
1 50
0 60
10 00
3 30
1 CO
2 90
14 00
21 00
4 70
5 60
8 95
5 10
4 20
1 00
12 50
3 30
9 50
15 80
1 -DO
25 00
1 00
3 50
18 40
15 50
-9 00
-9 00
-9 X
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
4 00
29 40
62 00
CONFIRM
RATING
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
o
Q
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CHEMICAL Aldcin
[L
MS
NY
3C
SB
i3B
103
04J
[LOCI
MSOC1
NY009
3COOI
l
i
2
i
NFU
.NFU
N/A
NFU
25 /
143 -
-9 /
27 /
•

9
2)
2S / 7
143 / 1
170 / 1
21 / 23
0 01
0 00
0 00
-9 00
0 11
0 01
0 5J
0 05
0 04
0 00
0 53
0 01
5
}
0
1
                                                     B-5

-------
  PESTICIDES [N GROUND WATER OATA BASE
POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE
FIPS NUMBER
CHEMICAL
r!I .8
HI N/A
HI 001
CHEMICAL
MS 10B
CHEMICAL
TX 28
TX B
TX 219
TX 303
TX 003
TX 317
TX 165
TX 305
TX 445
TX 437
TX 375
TX 045
TX Oil
CHEMICAL
MD IB
CHEMICAL
AL 089
y* N/A
CA 3
CO 123
7T 3B
HI 18
HI 907
HI N/A
HI 2C9
H ! 00 1
"I I/A
'A 743
!A M3
.'A 065
Ajne'-iT'Ti
HI001
HIOOJ
HI003
Arochlor
MS001
Arsenic
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
Atracon
HDOOJ
Atrarine
AL001
AR002
CAOOl
C0001
CT002
HI001
HIOOJ
HI003
HI003
HI003
rl'004
' \^Q ^
:AOOI
IAOOI
SUB-REF
NUMBER

1
3
5

1

1
2
3
j
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

1

1
1
I
I
1
1
1
3
4
S
1
I
T
^
3
ORIGIN

NFU
N/A
N/A

N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

NFU

NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO / POS

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

143 /

102 /
61 /
6 /
12 /
2 I
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 1
2 I
2 /
4 /
1 /

30 /

10 /
56 /
912 /
4 /
30 /
85 /
-9 /
9 /
-9 /
-9 /
44 /
19 /
1 /
1 /'

-9
1
1

2

53
L
4
5
2
1
2
L
I
1
2
1
1

1

4
1
74
4
6
J8
5
3
•\
1 t-
23
2
,4
[

SAMPLES
MO / POS

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

143 /

341 /
61 /
6 /
12 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 1
2 /
2 /
4 /
1 /

36 /

10 /
112 /
1069 /
36 /
JO /
35 /
•9 I
-9 /
-9 /
9 /
-3 /
"3 '
198 /
^ /

3
I
1

2

236
L
4
5
2
1
2
1
I
1
2
1
I

1

4
1
144
33
6
38
5
3
12
23
•9
39
104
1
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM

0 23
0 00
0 00

269 00

28 00
0 00
10 00
10 00
32 00
0 00
15 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
13 00
0 00
0 00

0 00

0 12
0 00
-9 00
0 00
o 01
0 OS
0 06
0 02
0 05
0 05
0,10
0 04
0 10
0 00
MAXIMUM

0 88
0 20
0 88

2300 00

585 00
33 00
13 00
17 00
35 00
100 00
16 00
12 00
33 00
15 00
16 00
17 00
11 00

0 1.0

0 25
5 80
-9 00
2 30
9 70
4 10
0 28
0 60
1 00
3 00
0 60
1 10
5 10
10 00
	 i,
MEAN

-9 00
0 20
0 88

1285 00

105 00
33 00
11 80
12 40
33 50
100 00
15 50
12 00
33 00
15 00
14 50
17 00
11 00

0 1.0

0 16
5 80
-9 00
1 00
-9 00
0 23
0 12
0 15
0 33
0 58
0 35
0 22
0 59
10 00
rcNFrRM
RATING

5
0
0

i^

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

1

0
2
0
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
L
1
                 3-6

-------
PAGE
                                                                                                    ... Li, 38
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                     POSITIVE DETECTIONS 3V CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE
IA
:A
I A,
IA
:A
:A
:A
I A
II
11
IL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
MD
ME
ME
MI
MI
1*4
NC
ME
NE
^
tfE
HE
ME
NE
NE
COUNTY
FTPS
067
!3l
321
C35
141

391
091
125
3
on
N/A
N/A
N/A
039
039
027
085
117
117
163


079
149
149

041
OL5
155
N/A
19.3
J8
033

059
149
35B
081
48
12B
128
12B
12B
12B
I:B
12B
REFERQCE
NUMBER
IAOQ2
IA002
[A003
IA003
IA003
IA004
[A005
IA005
IL002
I LOO 3
WI007
KS001
KS001
XSCXn
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KSOOL
KS001
KSOOl
KS001
KS002
KS002
MDOOJ
HD004
HEOQ2
HI001
MI001
MN002
NCOOl
NE001
NE002
NEOQ2
NE002
NE002
MEQ02
NE002
NE002
SUB-REF
NUMBER
I
2
I
3
5
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
J
3
3
3
3
I
2
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
2
2
2
2
2
2
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
NFU
PS
PS
NFU
NFU
SPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
SFU
SFU
N/A
SFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
SPS
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
SFU
SFU
SFU
N/A
SFU
SPS
fFU
fru
SFU
ffTJ
WTJ
N/A
SPS
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
WELLS
NO /
8 /
15 /
2 /
9 /
3 /
70 /
4 /
1 /
28 /
368 /
-9 /
-9 /'
-9 /
-9 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
I /
1 /
1 /
1 /
I /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
I /
84 /
56 /
JO /
15 /
88 /
7 /
17 /
100 /
5 /
47 /
57 /
14 '
18 /
21 /
21 /
16 /
17 /
POS
4
9
L
1
L
24
4
1
3
j
1
I
|
1
i
L
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
L
I
1
2
1
j
15
L
6
4
47
2
't j
!3
,4
16
21
21
4
• i
SAMPLES
NO / POS
40 /
50 ./
3 /
12 /
4 /
70 /
-9 /
35 /
79 /
368 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
I /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
1 /
I /
1 /
84 /
57 /
36 /
166 /
159 /
35 /
19 /
400 /
-9 /
47 ;
57 /
U /
IS /
116 /
40 /
22 /
59 /
16
12
I
2
2
24
-9
-9
12
3
-9
^
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
L
I
2
!_
2

1
I
[
I
1
2
2
j
125
1
L2
6
112
-9
13
18
14
16
116
40
4
46
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 10
0 10
0 00
2 20
2 00
0 10
0 00
0 00
1 07
0 40
-9 :c
0 00
0 00
0 00
7 40
7 40
3 40
4 10
1 50
0 00
0 00
3 40
0 00
U 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 40
-9 00
0 40
0 00
0 00
1 00
15 00
0 01
20 00
0 01
0 10
0 38
0 30
0 05
0 OL
0 02
0 02
MAXIMUM
0 35
1 60
4 10
4 40
2 90
U 00
0 50
0 11
7 30
2 50
4 80
2 10
1 20
2 SO
40 00
40 00
4 60
4 10
3 10
i 60
1 80
5 30
2 20
16 00
I 70
2 00
1 70
5 60
16-00
3 20
2 20
1470 00
0 90
9 50
0 40
210 00
107 00
42 40
212 00
1 12
2 30
1 12
6 96
2 02
0 99
0 10
14 72
MEAN
0 34
0 31
4 10
3 30
2 SO
-9 00
0 02
0 00
3 27
I 30
-9 00
2 10
1 20
2 50
23 70
23 70
4 00
4 10
2 30
1 60
1 80
4 35
2 20
13 50
I 70
2 00
1 70
5 60
16 00
3 20
1 80
-9 00
0 60
I 96
0 40
44 38
39 50
0 38
140 00
0 08
-9 00
0 75
1 15
0 39
0 25
0 06
1 02
CONFIRM
RATING
i
1
I
1
I
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
L
^
^
1
1
1
I
1
                                                   3-7

-------
PAGE  3
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND HATES DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NJ
NY
NY
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SO
TX
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
VT
/r
wt
W[
MI
wt
COUNTY
FTPS
065
099
063
047
019
1J7
083
121
157
047
001
035
081
089
079
107
167
177
14J
135
159
059
151
159
347
2B
083
115
23
9
B
B
Oil
B
207
001
005
009
017
019
025
027
017
3
N/A
388
38B
REFEREJCE
NUMBER
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NEOOJ
NE003
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NE005
NJ002
NY004
WI007
PA001
PA002
PA003
PA004
PA005
SD001
TXOOJ
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VTO02
'JS002
^rooi
WI002
W1002
SUB-REF ORIGIN
NUMBER
I NFU
1 NFU
I NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 N/A
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
I NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 SFU
1 PS
3 SPS
1 N/A
1 NFU
1 NFU
1 SPS
1 N/A
1 NFU
1 N/A
i NFU
1 NFU
1 SFU
1 SCC
1 SFU
1 NFU
1 SFU
1 SFU
4 N/A
1 NFU
1 SPS
2 SPS
WELLS
NO / POS
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 I
451 /
451 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
">: /
-. /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
66 /
27 /
1 /
43 /
20 /
53 /
58 /
1 /
-9 /
75 /
39 /
20 /
21 /
I /
15 /
18 /
29 /
17 /
-9 /
26 /
201 /
9 /
L
1
1
6
4
3
1
a
i
2
2
5
6
4
7
I
1
1
7
6
7
1
3
1
4
3
25
1
3
14
21
26
1
-9
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
}
2
•9
8
12
25
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
66 /
99 /
2 /
129 /
38 /
121 /
193 /
3 /
-9 /
80 /
43 /
22 /
22 /
-9 /
19 /
21 /
37 /
20 /
349 /
26 /
-9 /
-9 /
L
1
1
6
4
3
1
8
1
2
2
5
6
4
7
1
1
1
7
6
7
1
3
1
4
3
82
2
35
22
29
92
3
-9
2
5
1
1
-9
1
4
7
3
50
8
-9
-9
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 12
0 41
0 20
0 00
0 30
0 00
1 43
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 40
0 62
0 00
0 00
0 00
o n
0 23
0 27
0 00
0 16
0 00
0 30
0 10
0 12
70 00
0 20
0 01
0 20
0 10
0 82
1 70
4 90
7 10
a oo
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 40
1 10
1 20
-9 00
1 00
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
0 41
0 32
0 16
0 65
3 70
107 20
0 23
6 24
0 82
2 00
0 90
0 50
0 50
22 70
3 00
0 36
0 17
0 58
1 70
1 40
1 56
0 21
0 23
0 57
0 50
0 50
1500 00
170 00
3 00
1 11
3 00
11 00
20 00
7 10
20 90
15 40
3 40
1 10
24 00
1 20
5 00
6 00
2 30
140 00
9 00
-9 00
-9 00
i.
MEAN
0 41
0 32
0 16
0 47
2 30
36 10
0 23
1 30
0 82
1 20
0 40
0 30
0 30
4 90
1 60
0 36
0 17
0 58
0 50
0 50
0 70
0 21
0 20
0 57
0 35
-9 00
55 20
120 00
0 56
0 17
0 54
0 34
7 71
-9 00
12 50
9 50
3 40
0 00
24 00
1 20
3 50
3 23
3 20
-9 00
3 30
1 75
-9 00
:CNFIRM
RATING
t
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
L
1
1
L
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
                                                 B-8

-------
 PAGE   9
                                        PESTICIDES IN GROUND HATER DATA. BASE
                                      POSITIVE DETECTIONS B't CHEMICAL SY STATE
STATE COUNTY
FIPS
WI 8
WI 049
WI N/A
WI 107
REFERENCE SUB-REF
NUMBER NUMBER
WI003
WI004
WIOC5
WI007
1

1
L
ORIGIN
NFJ
PS
SPS
SPS
HELLS
NO /
39 /
5 /

-9 /
' PCS
' 18
' 5
1
' 1
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
161 /
6 /
1 /
-9 /
76
6
1
-9
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
0 10
22 OC
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
33 00
109 00
550 00
3000 00
(PPB)
MEAN
5 40
58 00
-9 00
-9 00
CONFIRM
RATING
1
3
0
0
CHEMICAL AzinptlQS-methyl
VA 28
CHEMICAL BHC
ID 2B
MS 10B
r* 001
VA002

ID001
MS001
NJW01
L

1
1
1
SFU

PS
NFU
NFU
66 i

55 /
143 /
-9 /
' 15

' 10
' 6
' -9
-9 /

107 /
143 /
-9 /
-9

11
6
-9
-9 00

0 00
1 40
-9 00
-9 00

0 02
4 25
-9 00
-9 00

0 00
2 70
-9 00
0

2
i
0
CHEMICAL Bencmyi
FL 099
FL005
1
SFU
38 /
' 2
247 /
2
1 50
2 50
2 00
0
CHEMICAL Bromacil
CA B
FL 2B
FL 021
FL 069
FL 5B
KS 191
KS 079
KS 079
KS 149
KS 043
KS 041
CA001
FLOOl
FL002
FL006
FL007
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
5
3
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
SPS
N/A
SPS
N/A
N/A
571 /
80 /
34 /
19 /
38 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
I /
1 /
2
' 32
I
' 4
1
' 1
I
' 1
' 1
' i
1
582 /
80 /
65 /
-9 /
40 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
L /
1 /
5
32
I
-9
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
-9 00
3 20
0 00
1 00
10 00
0 00
3 30
16 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
-9 00
200 00
2 95
10 80
22 00
I 10
5 SO
17 00
I 20
0 38
9 50
-9 00
-9 00
2 95
3 80
14 00
1 10
4 40
16 50
1 20
0 38
9 50
0
9
1
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
CHEMICAL Butylate
WI B
WI 38B
WI 388
US002
WI002
WI002
4
1
2
N/A
SPS
SPS
-9 /
I /
-9 /
' -9
' 1
' 17
18 /
-9 /
-9 /
14
-9
-9
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
2 90
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
2 90
-9 00
0
0
0
CHEMICAL Cartacyl
NY 103
RI 2B
wr N/A
NY009
RI902
wrooi
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
SPS
-9 ,
100 ,
53 /
' -9

' 2
25000 /
100 /
-9 /
36
1
-9
-9 00
0 00
-9 OO
-9 00
4 00
-9 00
-9 00
4 00
L 80
0
0
0
CHEMICAL Carbotucan
CA   B
             CAOOl
                                  NFTJ
                                              680 ,/   1
                                                           684 /
                                                                          -9 00
                                                                                   -9 00
                                                                                            -9 00
                                                   B-9

-------
PAGE .0
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTICNS 8Y CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE
FL
IA
MA
NY
PA
RI
RI
WI
WI
WI
COUNTY REFERENCE SUB-REF
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
SB FL007
091 IA005
B MA001
103 NY009
N/A PA006
009 RI901
2B RI902
B US002
N/A WI001
388 WI002
1
1
I
L
1
1
1
4
1
1
ORIGIN
SPS
PS
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
SPS
WELLS
NO /
28 /
4 /
146 /
-9 /
1 /
11 /
100 /
-9 /
26 /
72 /
PCS
0
-9
23
-9
1
6
11
-9
5
I
SAMPLES
NO /
-9
-9
146
26000
2
32
100
78
26
-9
PCS
/
/
/
-9
-9
23
/7000
/
/
/
/
/
/
2
16
11
2
5
-9
CCNCENTRATICNS (PPB)
MINIMUM
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
I 00
4 00
1 00
1 00
-9 00
2 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
-9 00
0 60
36 60
176 00
9 00
7 00
19 00
7 00
12 00
-9 00
	 i_unt LKN
MEAN RATING
-9 00 0
-9 00 0
-9 00 1
7 00 1
8 00 0
3 50 i
2 90 0
-9 00 0
7 00 0
15 00 0
CHEMICAL Carbon tetcachloride
HI
N/A HI003
3
N/A
-9 /
6
-9
/
6
0 08
0 50
0 25 0
CHEMICAL Chloramben
WI
WI
B USQQ2
388 WI002
4
1
N/A
SPS
-9 /
16 /
-9
1
29
-9
/
/
2
-9
-9 00
-9 00
50 00
-9 00
-9 00 0
50 00 0
CHEMICAL Chlordane
IA
ID
ID
IL
KS
KS
KS
MA
MS
091 IA005
28 ID001
28 ID001
5B IL001
1J9 KS001
121 KSOCl
133 KSOCl
001 MA002
10B HS001
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
PS
PS
PS
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU
4 /
55 /
55 /
25 /
1 /
1 /
L /
17 /
143 /
-9
I
1
21
1
1
1
7
2
-9
107
107
25
2
2
2
59
143
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
-9
1
3
21
2
2
2
U
2
-9 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 31
6 90
0 47
0 13
I 60
1 80
0.04
0 02
0 06
0 33
7 90
0 58
3 63
1 80
-9 00 0
0 00 2
0 00 2
0 03 5
0 32 L
7 40 1
0 53 1
0 88 0
I 70 1
CHEMICAL Chlorothalotui
HA
ME
NY
001 MA002
ME002
10J NY009
1
1
1
NFU
SFU
SFU
17 /
88 /
-9 /
2
1
-9
59
159
67
/
/
/
2
1
11
0 22
0 00
1 10
0 38
0 02
12 60
0 30 0
0 02 2
-9 00 1
CHEMICAL Chiotpyrifoa
IL
MA
58 IL001
001 M*OC2
1
1
NFU
NFU
25 /
17 /
IS
1
25
59
/
/
18
1
0 01
0 00
0 09
0 10
0 05 5
0 10 0
CHEMICAL Cryolite
NY
103 NYOO9
2
N/A
-9 /
9
99
/
7
0 30
1 79
-9 00 0
CHEMICAL Cya^azine
IA   043     IA001
                                 NFU
                                             19 /   1
                                                             /   3
                                                                        0 10
                                                                                 0 20
                                                                                          0 M
                                                  L-10

-------
 PACE  a
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                     POSITIVE  DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL 3Y STATE
                                                                                                    ._ 2., 98
STATE COUNTY
FIPS
IA 043
IA 065
:A u:
IA 021
:A 035
:A
:A 091
:L sa
LA 12B
MD 033
MN 35B
MN ?OB
ME 047
MY 083
PA 3
PA 8
'vT 027
WI 3
WI 388
REFERENCE
NUMBER
I Add I
IA001
IA002
IAOOJ
1A003
IA004
IA005
IL001
LAOOl
MD004
MN002
MN002
NE003
NY004
PA002
PA003
VT002
US002
WI002
SUB-REF
NUMBER
2
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
I
1
1
1
4
2
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
NFU
PS
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
PS
NFU
NFU
SFU
N/A
SPS
WEL
>C /
: /
i /
15 /
2 /
9 /
70 /
4 /
25 /
12 /
15 /
100 /
400 /
451 /
10 /
20 /
53 /
29 /
-9 /
-9 /
L3
PCS
,
1
]
1
1
7
4
10
1
12
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
-9
8
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
108 /
1 /
50 /
3 /
12 /
70 /
-9 /
25 /
-9 /
123 /
400 /
525 /
451 /
17 /
38 /
121 /
31 /
117 /
-9 /
24
1
7
1
2
7
-9
10
-9
16
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
80
-9
CONCEOTRATIONS (PP9)
MINIMUM
0 07
0 00
0 12
0 00
0 26
0 10
0 00
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 18
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
1 20
0 50
0 48
0 69
0 34
1 40
80 00
0 08
0 18
3 60
2 90
0 30
3 20
1.00
0 09
I 10
7 00
-9 00
-9 00
MEAN
0 36
0 50
0 32
0 69
0 30
-9 00
3 32
0 03
-9 00
0 63
0 22
0 30
3 20
1 00
0 09
I 10
7 00
-9 00
-9 00
CONFIRM
RATING
L

1
1
1
1
0
5
1.
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
CHEMICAL OK'
AZ B
CA 3
HI N/A
HI 007
HI N/A
HI 009
MD 045
MD N/A
SC B
VA 183
CHEMICAL DOT
ID 2B
ID 2B
IL 58
MS IOB
MS iOB
NJ 2B
N» 001
SM 001
3C 043
CHEMICAL Dae
A2001
CA001
HI002
HIOC3
HI003
HI003
MD001
MD002
SC002
VA001

ID001
ID001
IL001
MEO01
M5001
NJ002
NMOOl
NMOOl
3C001
thai
1
1
I
1
3
4
1
1
1
1

1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1

SFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU
N/A
SPS

PS
PS
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

40 /
I
5288 /21i3
95 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
36 /
6 /
81 /
U /

55 /
55 /
25 /
14J /
143 /
66 /
-9 /
-9 /
27 /

12
1
20
6
3
J
13
2

17
7
18
j
4
1
-9
-9
27

41 /
2
8108 /4201
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
48 /
6 /
95 /
13 /

107 /
107 /
25 /
143 /
14J /
66 /
-a /
-9 /
27 /

-9
1
20
6
9
3
-9
2

19
9
18
j
4
1
9
9
27

0 01
-9 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
2 00
6 00
0 01
76 00

0 00
0 00
0 01
2 00
6 00
0 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 06

0 02
-9 00
14 00
0 21
0 40
0 20
13 00
12 00
1 00
114 00

0 54
0 76
0 05
5 50
402 00
0 07
-9 00
-9 00
0 16

0 01
-9 00
0 03
0 21
0 04
0 06
6 20
9 00
-9 00
-9 00

0 02
0 02
0 03
3 JO
108 00
0 07
-9 00
-9 00
0 04

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5

I
2
5
1
1
1
0
0
1

MA   001     MA002
                                 NFU
                                              17 /
                                                          119  /
                                                                         0  21
                                                                                  1  07
                                                                                           0  46
                                                 B-ll

-------
PACE 12
                                                                                                  Ll'21, 23
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE
MY
OR
•VI
WI
WI
COUNTY REFERENCE
FIPS NUMBER
103 NY009
045 3R001
8 JS002
38B ™-n02
388 -.;02
SUB-REF ORIGIN
NUMBER
I SFU
! NFU
4 N/A
1 SPS
2 SPS
WELLS
NO /
-9 /
6 /
-9 /
3 /
-9 /
POS
-9
6
-9
3
1
SAMPLES
NO / POS
213 /
6 /
10 /
-9 /
-9 /
56
6
1
-9
-9
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
	 	 r~**+.tcrn\f
MINIMUM
1 00
9 11
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
1039 00
290 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
	 <-^«r inn
MEAN RATING
109 00 1
-9 00 0
-9 00 0
254 50 0
-9 00 0
:HEMICAL Diazmon
[L
MS
SB IL001
LOB MS001
1 NFU
1 NFU
25 /
143 /
6
7
25 /
143 /
6
7
0 01
12 00
0 08
478 00
0 05 5
162 00 1
CHEMICAL Dicamba
CT
FL
IA
ID
KA
ME
MN
MN
MT
TX
SB CT002
099 FL003
091 IA005
2B ID001
001 MA002
ME002
358 MN002
7OB MN002
099 MTOOl
207 TX003
V SFU
3 PS
1 PS
I PS
1 NFU
1 SFU
1 N/A
2 N/A
5 NFU
1 N/A
U /
-9 /
4 /
55 /
17 /
71 /
100 /
400 /
13 /
75 /
1
1
4
17
1
1
1
3
5
1
11 /
-9 /
-9 /
107 /
60 /
126 /
400 /
525 /
50 /
80 /
1
1
-9
21
I
1
4
6
6
1
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 53
0 05
0 06
0 00
0 01
0 63
12 00
0 49
0 06
1 10
0 86
0 21
3 00
0 38
0 01 1
0 63 0
0 31 0
0 02 2
0 06 0
1 10 2
0 66 1
0 10 1
0 82 0
0 88 1
CHEMICAL Dieldcin
m
HI
IA
ID
IL
KS
KS
NE
NJ
N/A HIOOJ
N/A H1004
091 IA005
28 tDOOl
125 IL002
133 KS001
115 KS001
1 28 NE002
28 NJ002
J N/A
1 NFU
1 PS
1 PS
1 NFU
2 N/A
2 N/A
2 NFU
1 SFU
-9 /
44 /
4 /
55 /
28 /
1 /
1 /
17 /
66 /
5
3
4
33
12
1
1
1
1
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
107 /
Ul /
2 /
2 /
34 /
66 /
5
-9
-9
51
26
2
2
1
1
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 10
0 22
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 10
0 03
0 M
0 08
0 U
0 26
0 01
0 02
0 00 0
0 10 0
0 00 0 '
0 01 2
0 10 0
0 11 1
0 24 1
-9 00 1
0 02 1
CHEMICAL DLiiwtiioatB
CA
B CA001
1 NFU
612 /
I
526 /
1
-9 00
-9 00
-9 OO 0
CHEMICAL Dinosab
KA
ME
MY
W[
WI
8 MA001
ME002
133 NY009
3 'JSO02
N/A W1001
1 NFU
1 SFU
1 SFU
4 N/A
1 NFU
147 /
88 /
-9 /
-9 /
26 /
13
7
-9
-9
9
147 /
'.59 /
% /
125 /
26 /
10
3
6
j
9
0 36
0 06
0 60
-9 00
26 00
36 70
2 30
4 50
5 50
74 00
-9 00 1
0 67 2
-9 00 1
-9 00 0
46 20 0
                                                  B-12

-------
  PACE
                                        PESTICIDES EN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                      POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE  SUB-REF   ORIGIN
       FIPS   NUMBER    NUMBER
                                                  WELLS      SAMPLES

                                               NO  / POS   NO  / PCS

                                               10J /   2     -9 /  -9
    CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)

MINIMUM   MAXIMUM    MEAN

 -9 00    -9 00     5 50
CONFIRM
 RATING
  WI   388     WI002

CHEMICAL  Disultoton

  WI   N/A     WI001

CHEMICAL  Diuron
CHEMICAL  ETU

  ME           NE002

CHEMICAL  Endoaulfan
 Fl   039     FL003
 
-------
PAGE 14
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL 3V STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE SUB~R£F ORIGIN
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
7A 28 VA002 I SFU
CHEMICAL Endrin
IL 125 11002 ! NFU
CHEMICAL Ethopcop
NY 103 NY009 1 SFU
CHEMICAL Fonofos
IS. 043 IA001 2 NFU
IA [A004 1 NFU
NE 061 NE003 1 NFU
CHEMICAL Givphosate
VA 28 VA002 1 SFU
CHEMICAL HeptactUor
AL 089 TN001 2 NFU
ID 28 IDOOL 1 PS
EL 58 11001 1 NFU
KS 133 KS001 2 N/A
.MA 001 MA002 1 NFU
CHEMICAL Hexachlocobenzene
[D 28 TDOOl 1 PS
MS 10B MSOCl 1 SFU
CHEMICAL Hexazinone
HI IB HI001 L tfd
HI 001 HIOOJ 5 N/A
ME ME002 1 SFU
CHEMICAL Isofenphos
MA 001 MA002 L NFU
CHEMICAL Undane
FL 039 FL003 2 PS
FL B JS002 2 NFU
WELLS SAMPLES CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
NO / PCS NO / PCS MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN
56 / 29 -9 / -9 -9 00 -9 00 -9 00

28 / 16 ill / 61 0 00 0 67 0 02

-9 / -9 86/23 0 18 12 60 -9 00

1 / 1 108 / 1 0 00 0 11 0 11
70/3 70/3 0 11 0 90 -9 00
451 /I 451/1 0 00 0 06 0 06

66/6 -9 / -9 -9 00 -9 00 -9 00

4/1 -9 / -9 0 00 0 05 -9 00
55/1 107 / L 0 00 0 02 0 00
25 / 16 25/16 0 04 0 81 0 19
1/1 2/2 0 02 0 03 0 03
17/4 59/8 0 Oj 0 12 0 05

55/3 107/3 0 00 0 01 0 00
143/4 143/4 3 90 5 50 4 70

-9 / -9 -9 / -9 0 05 0 70 -9 00
-9 / 9 -9/9 0 06 0 56 0 19
38/2 159/2 7 00 9 00 3 00

17 / L 59 / 1 0 00 1 L7 1 17

-9/1 9/1 000 009 009
% / 1 56/1 0 00 0 OL 0 00

CONFIRM
RATING
0

0

1

1
1
1

0

0
2
5
1
0

2
1

5
0
2

0

0
0
                                                 B-14

-------
  PAGE  IS
                                        PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                      POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL 3V STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE SUB-REF
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
ID 28 ID001 1
[L se rLOOi i
MS 10B MS001 1
NJ 28 NJ002 1
NY 103 NY009 2
SC 043 SC001 1
CHEMICAL Linuron
FL 009 FL005 1
WI N/A WIOOl 1
WI B WIOOJ 1
CHEMICAL MCPA
MN 70B MN002 2
MT 099 KTOOL 5
CHEMICAL MalatMon
ID 28 [D001 I
MS LOB MSOOl 1
CHEMICAL Metalaxyl
FL 009 FLO05 I
1C 065 rt002 1
CHEMICAL Methamidophos
ME ME002 1
CHEMICAL Hethomyl
FL 117 USOOl 1
NY 103 NY009 1
NY 075 USOOl 2
-HEMICAL MeUiyl parathion
ID 28 [D001 1
MS iOB MSOOl 1
'/A 23 VA002 1
ORIGIN
PS
NFU
NFU
SFU
N/A
NFU

SFU
NFU
NFU

N/A
NFU

PS
NFU

SFU
N/A

SFU

NFU
SFU
NFU

PS
NFU
SFU

NO
55
25
143
66
-9
27

38
26
21

400
L3

55
143

38
-9

38

4
-9
4

55
143
66
WELLS
/ POS
/ 2
/ 3
/ 5
/ 1
/ -9
/ 15

/ 2
/ 1
/ -9

/ 2
/ 3

/ I
/ 2

/ 1
/ -9

/ 9

/ 2
/ -9
/ i

/ L
/ 6
/ 13
SAMPLES
NO /
107
25
143
66
131
27

247
26
-9

525
50

107
143

247
a

45

27
25000
32

107
143
9
POS
/ 2
/ 3
/ 5
/ 1
/ 1
/ 15

/ 2
/ 1
/ -9

/ 4
/ 3

/ L
/ 2

/ 1
/ 3

/ 10

/ 3
/ 80
/ 1

/ 1
/ 5
/ -9
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
0 00
0 01
0 50
0 00
0 00
-9 00

0 20
0 00
1 JO

0 13
0 36

0 00
30 00

-9 00
0 27

0 09

1 00
1 00
-9 00

0 00
10 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
0 08
0 20
47 00
0 05
0 13
0 02

0 42
3 00
2 70

2 20
5 50

5 20
53 00

2 30
1 40

10 50

20 00
9 00
1 00

0 01
256 00
-9 00
(PPB)
MEAN
0 00
0 07
a :o
0 35
0 13
0 01

0 31
3 00
1 90

0 26
2 38

0 03
41 50

-9 00
1 00

4 80

8 00
-9 00
1 00

0 00
88 40
-9 00
CONFIRM
RATING
2
5
i
1
0
1

0
0
i

i
0

2
1

0
0

2

0
I
0

2
1
0
CHEMICAL  MeUiv lene chloride

  H!   N/A     HJOOJ       J
                                   N/A
                                               -9 /
4 00
        19 00
                 11 50
                                                  B-15

-------
PAGE 15
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS 3V CHEMICAL 3Y STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE SUB-REF
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
HI
CHEMI
AR
CT
:A
TA
IA
:A
IA
n
11
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
KS
MN
m
m
PA
PA
PA
PA
IX
>/t
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI
001
CAL
N/A
SB
043
065
131
035

B
017
027

079
015
155
193
70B
083
115
28
B
B
Oil
093
025
B
J8B
388
B
049
N/A
107
HI003 5
Metolachloc
AR002 1
CTC02 1
IAOOI 2
IA001 3
IA002 2
IAOOJ 3
IA004 1
IL003 1
WI007 2
KSOOl 3
KS001 3
KSOOl 3
KSOOl 3
KSOOl 3
KS002 2
1*002 2
NY004 I
WI007 J
PA001 1
PA003 1
PA004 1
PAOOS 1
TX003 1
VT002 I
USO02 4
WI002 1
WI002 2
WI003 1
W1004 1
WI005 1
W1007 1
ORIGIN
N/A

SPS
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
N/A
SPS
N/A
PS
SPS
N/A
NFU
NFU
N/A
DC
DC
N/A
SPS
SPS
NFU
PS
SPS
SPS
WELLS
NO / POS
-9 /

56 /
30 /
1 /
1 /
15 /
9 /
70 /
368 /
-9 /
I /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
56 /
400 /
10 /
1 /
43 /
53 /
58 /
1 /
75 /
18 /
-9 /
65 /
-9 /
31 /
5 /
1 /
-9 /
2

1
3
I
L
1
1
2
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
2
6
1
4
4
8
1
1
I
-9
1
19
8
5
1
L
SAMPLES
NO / POS
-9 /

112 /
30 /'
108 /
1 /
50 /
12 /
70 /
J68 /
-9 /
1 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
1 /
57 /
525 /
17 /
L /
129 /
121 /
193 /
3 /
80 /
21 /
126 /
-9 /
-9 /
104 /
6 /
1 /
-9 /
2

1
3
3
L
1
2
2
1
-9
L
2
2
I
1
1
2
10
1
6
5
31
3
1
1
34
-9
-9
28
6
1
-9
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
3 90

0 00
0 20
0 25
0 00
0 00
4 50
0 32
0 00
-9 00
0 00
0 34
1.00
0.00
0 00
-9 00
0 30
1 20
0 00
0.10
0 20
0 10
1 20
0 00
0 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 20
1 30
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
11 00

6 70
32 32
0 62
0 25
0 U
7 30
7 80
6 00
10 00
0 6L
1 50
1 60
4 60
4 90
150 00
0 55
112 00
200 00
0 40
0 41
0 30
48 00
5 50
3 20
88 00
-9 00
-9 00
12 00
157 00
8 70
1300 00
MEAN
7 45

S 70
-9 00
0 43
0 25
0 11
5 90
4 36
6 00
-9 00
0 61
0 92
1 30
4 60
4 90
-9 00
0 42
20 90
200 00
0 24
0 27
0 16
17 66
5 50
3 20
-9 00
55 00
-9 00
4 00
65 60
-9 00
-9 00
:CNFIRM
RATING
0

2
^
1
1
I
1
1
1
0
I
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
2
I
1
I
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
CHEMICAL Metnbuzin
!A
LA
[A
:A
:A
:A
:A
T r
IL
067
131
021
035

091
091
58
US
IA002 L
IA002 2
IA003 1
IA003 3
[A004 1
IA005 1
!A005 2
I LOO I 1
IL002 1
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
NFU
PS
PS
NFU
NTU
8 /
15 /
2 /
9 /
70 /
4 /
1 /
25 /
28 /
I
j
1
:
2
1
;
19
7
40 /
50 /
3 /
12 I
70 /
9 /
J5 I
25 /
"9 /
2
13
1
2
T
-9
-9
19
U
0 09
0 10
0 00
0 44
0 29
0_00
0 00
0 01
0 01
0 15
4 30
1 40
0 75
1 10
0 41
0 15
0 18
Q 11
0 12
1 33
1 40
0 59
0 70
0 06
0 00
0 03
0 05
i
i
1
i
1
0
0
5
0
                                               B-16

-------
PACE 17
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
STATE COUNT? REFERENCE
FIPS NUMER
IL 8
KS 103
KS 079
KS 015
KS 155
ME
MN 358
MN 706
WI 8
WI N/A
WT 38B
rtl B
ILOOJ
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
MEC02
MNr"^
M*^
US002
WI001
W1002
WI003
SUB-REF
NUMBER
1
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
ORIGIN
NFU
SFU
SPS
SPS
N/A
SFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
SPS
NFU
'WELLS
NO /
368 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
38 /
100 /
400 /
-9 /
26 /
53 /
36 /
POS
i
i
i
i
i
4
4
2
-9
13
2
20
SAMPLES
NO / POS
368 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
1 /
159 /
400 /
525 /
104 /
26 /
-9 /
95 /
1
1
2
1
1
4
4
3
1
13
-9
41
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00
0 00
0 16
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 12
0 10
-9 00
1 00
-9 00
0 20
MAXIMUM
0 60
0 15
0 18
2 10
0 13
0 66
0 78
1.05
1 80
6 00
-9 00
6 30
MEAN
0 60
0 15
0 17
2 10
0 13
0 16
0 41
0 23
-9 00
2 00
1 80
L 34
CONFIRM
RATING
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
I
CHEMICAL Molinate
CA B
CA 8
CA001
CA001
1
1
NFU
NFU
267 /
212 /
2
2
371 /
290 /
16
3
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
0
0
CHEMICAL Naled
Ft 025
NY 103
FL003
NY009
1
2
PS
N/A
-9 /
-9 /
1
-9
-9 /
32 /
!
6
0 00
3 00
0 81
7 00
0 81
-9 00
0
0
CHEMICAL Oxamyl
MA B
NY LOJ
RI 009
RI 2B
CHEMICAL PCNB
ID 2B
CHEMICAL PCP
FD 28
ttl 35B
MS 108
NM J7B
MA001
NY009
RI901
RI902

ID001

IDOOl
NN002
MB001
moot
1
I
L
1

1

1
1
1
1
NFU
SFU
NFU
N/A

PS

PS
N/A
N/A
NFU
146 /
-9 /
U /
100 /

55 /

55 /
100 /
143 /
-9 /
1
-9
4
1

19

40
1
101
-9
146 /
25000 /
32 /
100 /

107 /

107 /
400 /
L43 /
-9 /
I
900
5
1

33

65
3
101
-9
0 00
1 00
I 00
0 00

0 00

0 00
0 42
2 20
-9 00
1 00
395 00
2 00
2 00

0.22

0 05
0 64
149 00
-9 00
-9 00
7 20
I 33
2 00

0 02

0 01
0 58
18 30
-9 00
1
1
L
0

2

2
1
1
0
CHEMICAL Paraquat
NY 1CJ
'VA 28
NY009
VA002
2
1
N/A
SFU
-9 /
66 /
-9
0
14 /
-9 /
1
-9
0 00
-9 00
3 00
-9 00
3 00
-9 00
0
0
CHEMICAL Parathion
                                NFU
                                             45 /
                                                         45 /    2
                                                                       0 02
                                                                                0 04
                                                                                         0 03
                                                B-17

-------
PWZ 18
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA 9ASE
                                    POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL  BY STATE
STATE COUNTY REFERENCE
PIPS NUWER
CHEMICAL
VA 2B
CHEMICAL
KS 053
ME
Phosmet
VS002
Picloram
KS001
HE002
»« 708 l*»02
MT 099
ND 52B
ND 079
ND 079
ND 5B
NY 103
3D 8
HI B
CHEMICAL
CA B
TX 275
CHEMICAL
11 125
1*1 708
CHEMICAL
KS 193
NE 12B
PA B
CHEMICAL
FL B
ID 28
CHEMICAL
CA 8
CT 8B
HI 009
IL 125
MD IB
MT001
ND001
ND002
ND002
ND003
NY009
S0001
WI003
Pcometon
CAOOl
TX003
Propachlor
IL002
**°2
Propazine
KS002
NE002
PA003
Sllvw
U9002
ID001
Sinazirw
CAOOl
CT002
HI003
IL002
MD003
SUB-REF
NUMBER

1

2
1
2
5
I
1
1
1
2
1
1

1
1

1
2

2
1
1

2
1

1
1
4
I
I
ORIGIN

SFU

N/A
SFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU

NFU
NFU

NRJ
N/A

SPS
NFt)
ww

rev
PS

mj
SFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
ViEtLS
NO / POS

66 / 1

1 / I
88 / 1
400 / 3
13 / 2
92 / 7
126 / 11
126 / 11
188 / 7
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
9 / -9

120 / 8
75 / 2

28 / 2
400 / 2

56 / 1
57 / 2
53 / 1

96 / 1
55 / 9

1285 / 57
30 / 1
-9 / 1
28 / 8
JO / i
SAMPLES
NO / POS

-9 / -9

2 1 2
159 / I
525 / 5
50 / 7
92 / 7
137 / 15
137 / 15
486 / 19
11 / 1
-9 / -9
-9 / -9

139 / 16
80 / 4

79 / 2
525 / 2

57 / 2
57 / 2
121 / 1

96 / I
107 / 11

1464 / 109
30 / 1
-9 / I
79 / 12
36 / I
CCNCEMTRATICNS (PPB)
MINIMUM

-9 00

3 30
0 00
0 08
0 06
0 08
0 02
0 02
0.10
0 00
-9 00
0 25

-9 00
5-20

0 22
0-20

-9,00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00

-9 00
0 00
0 00
I 07
0 00
MAXIMUM

-9 00

S 60
1 40
0 63
16 00
1 44
3 56
3 56
12 80
0.50
8 30
49 00

-9 00
29 60

2 98
0 50

2 50
0.10
0 20

0 02
0 62

-9 00
9 10
0 10
7 30
0 10
MEAN

-9 00

4 45
1 40
0 16
2 57
0 43
0 40
0 40
3 40
0 50
-9 OO
16 60

-9 00
16 60

1 60
0 35

-9 00
0 10
0 20

0 02
0 01

-9 00
9 10
0 10
3 27
0 10
-onr IKW
RATING

Q

I
2
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1

0
1

0
1

1
I
2

0
2

0
1
0
0
1
                                                  B-18

-------
PAGE
                                     PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                   POSITIVE DETECTIONS Bf CHEMICAL BY STATE
                                                                                                 .„ a, 58
STATE COUWTV REFERENCE SUB-REF
FIPS NUMBER NUMBER
MI 059 MI 001 1
MI 149 MI001 1
NN 35B MN002 1
NE 12B «JE002 1
NJ 2B NJ002 1
PA 2B PAOOl I
PA B PA002 1
PA 8 PA003 L
'/» 2B VBOD2 1
VT 003 WTQ02 1
VT 009 VT002 1
WI 049 HI004 1
CHEMICAL Sulprofos
IA 021 IA003 1
CHEMICAL TCP
HA OC1 MA002 1
CHEMICAL TOE
HS iOB MS001 1
CHEMICAL Tebuthiucon
TX 309 TX001 I
CHEMICAL Terbufos
I A 02i IA003 1
[A 041 IA003 2
IA 035 EA003 3
IA 193 IA003 4
IA 141 IA003 5
CHEMICAL Toiuw
HI 007 HIOOJ I
HI N/A HI003 3
HI 001 HIOOJ 5
CHEMICAL Toxaphene
MS IOB ME001 1
CHEMICAL Trial late
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
SFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
PS

SFU

NFU

NFU

NFU

SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFW

N/A
N/A
N/A

fTU

WELLS
NO
1
17
100
57
66
43
20
53
66
14
21
S

2

17

143

2

2
2
9
9
3

-9
-9
-9

143

/
/'
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

/

/

/

/

/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/

/

PQS
3
1
i
I
2
10
1
12
26
I
I
5

I

1

2

2

2
I
^
2
I

I
I
I

2

SAMPLES
NO /
35
19
400
57
66
129
38
121
-9
16
22
6

3

60

143

16

3
2
12
9
4

-9
-9
-9

143

POS
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

/

/

/

/

/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/

/

5
1
4
1
2
15
9
18
-9
I
1
6

20

2

2

13

3
1
I
2
2

1
i
I

2

CONCEOTRATICHS (PPB)
MINIMUM
i 00
0 00
0 49
0 00
0 10
0 20
0 01
0 20
-9 00
0 00
0 00
0 27

1.30

0 10

3 30

0 00

0 30
0 00
0 00
1 70
4 80

0 00
0 00
0 00

150 00

MAXIMUM
16 00
11 00
2 58
0 10
0 10
3 40
0 17
3 40
-9 00
3 40
2.30
2 20

1 40

0 76

6 20

380 00

12 00
1.20
U 00
2 90
5 90

0 20
0 20
0 20

4910 00

(CAN
7 60
11 00
1 40
0 10
0 10
0 71
0 04
0 59
-9 00
3 40
2 30
1 30

1 35

0 43

4 30

276 67

7 40
I 20
U 00
I 90
5 40

0 20
0 20
0 20

3205 00

CONFIRM
RATING
0
0
[
I
t
1
1
2
0
t
1
3

1

0

1

0

4
4
4
4
4

0
0
0

1

                                PS
                                            51 /   8     98/9
                                                                       0 00
                                                                                0 13
                                                                                         0  01
                                                B-19

-------
  PAGE 20
                                        PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA 8ASE
                                      POSITIVE DETECTIONS BY CHEMICAL BY STATE
CHEMICAL  Triazine screen
  FL   069     FLOC6       I

CHEMICAL  Trifluralin
                                   NRJ
                                                1 /   0
                                                            -9 /  -9
                                                                         -9 00
                                                                                  -9 00
                                                                                           -9 00
CHEMICAL  p-Nurophenol

  MS   LOB     MSOOL       1
                                   SFU
L43 /   3
             L43 /   3
                              00
                                    20 00
                                             12 80
                                                                                                      .1. 21 38



FIP5

NUJCER

NUMBER
WE!
NO /
:LS
90S
SAMJ
NO /
>LES
POS
CCNCE
MINIMUM
NITRATIONS
MAXIMUM
(PPB)
MEAN

RATING
a
IL
KS
KS
KS
MD
MS
ND
NE
SB
125
103
013
013
SB
LOB
52B
019
ILOOL
IL002
KS001
KS001
KS001
MD003
MSOOL
ND001
NE003
1
I
2
2
2
1
I
I
1
NFU
NFU
SFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU
SPS
NFU
25 /
28 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
30 /
143 /
1 /
451 /
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
25 /
79 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
36 /
143 /
1 /
451 /
8
14
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0 08
0 01
0 37
0 53
2 70
0 00
-9 00
0 00
0 00
1 70
0 14
2 20
3 70
5 40
0 10
-9 00
0.03
0 42
0 74
0 03
1 28
2 12
4 05
0 10
-9 00
0 03
0 42
5
0
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
                                                    B-20

-------
           APPEM3IX C
POSITIVE EMERIES SCREED BY

-------
   PACE  I
                                             PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATS BASE
                                                POSITIVES B¥ STATE BV CHEMICAL
                                    SUB-REF COUNTY
                          NUMBER    NUMBER   FTPS
   WELLS      SAMPLES

NO  / PCS   MD  / PCS
    CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
	  CCNFTRH
 MINIMUM   MAXIMUM    (CAN     RATING
STATE AK
Aldicarb
STATE U
Aldicarb
Aidicarb
Atrazine
Heptachlor

US900

US902
US902
AL001
THD01

2 031

1 083
1 OOj
1 089
2 089

NFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

4 / 1

34 / 1
19 / 1
10 / 4
4 / 1

-9 /

35 /
20 /
10 /
-9 /

-9

1
2
4
-9

0 00

0 00
5 00
0 12
0 00

31 00

I 00
7 00
0 25
0 05

-9 00

1 00
6 00
0 16
-9 00

0

D
0
0
3
 STATE  AR

 Aiachloc
 Atraztne
 Metoiachlor

 STATE  AZ

 Aldacarb
 Aldicarb
 DBCP
 EBB

 STATE  CA

 1.2-0
 1,2-0
 1,2-D
 Alachlor
 Aldicarb
 Aldicarb
 Aldicarb
 Aldicarb
 Aldicarb
 Mdicatb
 Atcazine
 Srcmacil
 Carbofucan
 DBCP
 Dimethoate
 Diuron
 EDB
Molinate
Molinace
Proneton
US902
US902
AL001
THD01
AR002
AS002
AR002
US900
US900
A2001
A2BOI
CAOOl
CA901
CA901
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CA901
CA903
0504
CMOS
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
CAOOl
1 083
1 OOj
1 089
2 089
1 N/A
1 N/A
1 N/A
3 2B
18 2B
1 B
1 8
1 8
1 015
3 049
1 B
1 8
i e
I 015
1 015
1
1 019
1 8
1 8
1 8
1 8
I 8
1 B
I 3
1 B
1 B
1 8
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
SPS
SPS
NFU
NFU
SFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NPJ
NFU
34
19
10
4
56
56
56
4
2
40
40
3175
. 40
9
430
481
3
40
22
27
5
912
571
680
5288
612
728
964
267
212
120
/ 1
/ 1
/ 4
/ 1
/ 1
/ 1
/ 1
/ 1
/ 2
/ 1
/ I
/ 64
/ 28
/ 1
/ 1
/ 30
/ 1
/ 24
/ 17
/ 12
/ 2
/ 74
/ 2
/ I
/2H3
i i
/ 9
/ 27
/ 2
/ 2
i 8
35
20
10
-9
112
112
112
-9
2
41
43
5122
450
-9
434
797
3
450
72
433
57
1069
582
634
8108
626
762
1066
371
290
139
/ 1
/ 2
/ 4
/ -9
/ 1
/ 1
/ 1
/ -9
/ 2
/ 2
/ 1
/ 316
/ 39
/ -9
/ 1
/ 225
/ 1
/ 318
/ 63
/ 10S
/ 17
/ 144
/ 5
/ 1
/4201
/ 1
/ 24
/ 40
/ 16
/ 3
/ 16
0 00
5 00
0 12
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
2.50
0 01
0 00
-9 00
0.00
0 40
-9,00
-9 00
-9.00
0.00
0 00
1 00
I 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
I 00
7 00
0 25
0 05
2 00
5 80
6 70
6 00
15 00
0 02
0 09
-9 00
62 00
0 6C
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
47 00
44 00
78 00
93 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
6 00
0 16
-9 00
2.00
5 80
6 70
-9 00
9 30
0 01
0 09
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
10 00
12 20
18 60
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
Q
0
3
3
2
2
2
a
0
i
3
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
3
-\
0
3
0
Q
0
0
0
                                                        C-l

-------
PAGE  2
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATEK DATA BASE
                                              POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Simazine
STATE CO
Atrazine
STATE CT
I 2-0
1,2-D
1,2-D
1,2-D
1,2-D
1,2-0
1,2-0
1,2-D
2.4-D
Alachlor
Atcazine
Dicamba
EDB
Metolachlor
Simazine
STATE FL
2.4-0
2,4-D
Machlor
Alachlor
Aidicarb
Aldicacb
Aidicarb
Aidicatb
Mdicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aldicirb
Aid-.carb
Aidicarb
Aldicsrn
Aidicarb
AldicarD
REFERENCE
NUMBER
CA001

CC001

CTOOl
CTOOl
CTOOl
CTOOl
CTOOl
CTOOl
CTOOl
CT002
CT002
CT002
CT002
CTO02
CT002
CT002
CT002

FL003
FL003
FL004
FL007
FL004
FL006
FL007
FL901
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL902
FL903
FL903
F',903
FL903
FL905
US900
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FTPS
1

1

I
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
3
1
1
1
L
1
1
1
2
3
6
7
7
9
J
4
5
6
1
5
B

123

007
003
003
003
013
009
007
88
SB
8B
8B
SB
88
8B
SB

025
099
B
5B
B
069
5B
055
127
127
057
055
057
057
069
4B
095
127
127
105
4B
ORIGIN
NFU

NFU

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU

PS
PS
.SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO / POS
1235 /

4 /

2 1
16 /
3 /
8 /
10 /
3 /
1 /
2 /
11 /
30 /
30 /
11 /
2 /
30 /
30 /

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
33 /
783 /
3 /
14 /
44 /
2 /
5 /
7 /
45 /
2 /
3 /
3 /
252 /
7 /
39 /
4 /
172 /
3 /
57

4

1
3
I
2
4
1
1
L
2
2
6
1
2
3
1

1
1
2
2
9
0
1
32
2
5
5
33
1
2
3
2
1
3
3
95
4
SAMPLES
NO / POS
1464 / 109

36 /

Z /
17 /
3 /
10 /
13 /
6 /
5 /
2 /
11 /
30 /
30 /
11 /
2 /
30 /
30 /

-9 /
-9 /
12 /
35 /
784 /
-9 /
14 /
120 /
41 /
100 /
95 /
194 /
6 /
26 /
24 /
252 /
10 /
42 /
5 /
3346 /
15 /

33

L
3
1
3
7
1
I
1
2
2
6
1
2
3
1

1
1
12
3
10
-9
1
85
21
62
56
133
1
19
IS
I
3
6
4
828
5
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
-9 00

0 00

0 00
0 05
0.00
14 00
0 36
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 10
0 01
0 00
0 14
0 20
0 00

0 00
0 00
2 00
45 90
2.00
-9 00
0 00
1 00
L 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
3 00
1 00
6 00
4 00
1 00
15 00
0 00
0 50
MAXIMUM
-9 00

2 30

4 30
12 90
1 60
290 00
51 00
4 70
14 30
I 30
0 01
13 08
9 70
0 01
0 50
32 32
9 10

0 39
4 34
99 90
89 50
27 00
-9 00
1 65
416 00
6 00
350 00
235 00
415 00
2 00
36 CO
4 00
19 00
6 00
5 30
130 00
1264 00
5 00
MEAN
-9 00

1 00

4 30
5 98
1 60
152 00
16 18
4 70
14 30
1 30
0 01
6 59
-9 00
0 01
0 32
-9 00
9 10

0 39
4 34
66 50
62 30
7 20
-9 00
1 65
47 90
3 14
54 LL
66 40
43 38
2 00
10 20
2 47
12 50
5 00
2 90
53 50
-9 00
2 30
BATING
0



7
2
2
2
2
2
2
i
I
1
1
L
1
L
1

0
0
1
1
1
1
I
0
Q
0
0
0
0
^
o
0
1
3
~J
1
^
                                                       02

-------
PAGE  3
                                          PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                             POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Aldicarb
Aldicarb
3enomyi
Bromactl
Bromacil
Bromacil
Brooiacil
Carbofuran
Dicamba
Qiuron
Diuron
EDB
Endosuifan
Lindane
Lindane
Linuron
Metalaxyl
Methcmyl
Naied
Silvex
Tnazine screen
STATE GA
Aldicarb
Aldicarb
EDS
STATE HI
1.2-0
1,2-D
1,3-D
2,4-D
2,4-0
Ametryn
Ametr/n
Ametr/n
Atrazine
Atraztne
Acrazine
Atrazinc
Atrazine
Atraz tne
Caroon te'.rachionde
DBCP
OBCP
REFERENCE
NUMBER
US900
US901
FL005
FL001
FL002
FL006
FL007
FLC07
FL003
FL005
FL006
US002
FL003
FL003
US002
FL005
FLCO5
US001
FL003
US002
FL006

US902
US902
GA001

HI003
HI003
HI003
HI003
HI004
HI001
HI003
HIOOJ
HI001
HI003
HI003
HIOOJ
HI003
HI004
HI003
HI002
HI003
SUB-REF COUNTY ORIGIN
NUMBER FIPS
6
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
L

1
1
1

3
4
3
3
1
1
3
5
1
1
3
4
5
1
3
1
1
057
58
099
2B
021
069
5B
58
099
099
069
B
039
039
B
009
009
117
025
8
069

177
205
117

N/A
009
N/A
N/A
N/A
IB
N/A
001
IB
007
N/A
009
001
N/A
N/A
N/A
007
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
PS
SFU
NFU
NFU
PS
PS
NFU
SFU
SFU
NFU
PS
NFU
NFU

NFU
NFU
NFU

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
WELLS
NO /
3 /
17 /
38 /
30 /
34 /
19 /
38 /
28 /
-9 /
38 /
19 /
7609 /
-9 /
-9 /
96 /
38 /
38 /
4 /
-9 /
96 /
L /

23 /
7 /
30 /

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
44 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
85 /
-9 /
-9 /
9 /
-9 /
44 /
9 /
95 /
-9 /
POS
1
2
2
32
1
4
1
0
1
3
0
828
-9
1
I
2
[
2
[
1
Q

2
1
10

4
1
L
I
1
-9
I
1
38
S
3
12
23
2
6
12
1
SAMPLES
NO / POS
3 /
48 /
247 /
30 /
65 /
-9 /
40 /
-9 /
-9 /
247 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
96 /
247 /
247 /
27 /
-9 /
96 /
-9 /

25 /
8 /
46 /

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
85 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
I
3
2
32
1
-9
3
-9
1
3
-9
-9
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
-9

3
1
23

4
1
1
1
-9
3
1
1
38
5
8
12
23
-9
6
-9
1
CCNCENTRAT1CNS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00
1 00
1 50
3 20
0 00
1 00
10 00
-9 00
0 00
0 02
-9 00
-9 00
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 20
-9 00
1 00
0 00
0 00
-9 00

2 00
0 00
0 02

0 64
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 23
0 00
0 00
0 05
0 06
0 02
0 05
0 05
0 10
o oe
0 00
0 00
MAXIMUM
375 00
1 00
2 50
200 00
2 95
10 80
22 00
-9 00
0 63
1 54
-9 00
-9 00
0 03
0 09
0 01
0 42
2 30
20 00
0 81
0 02
-9 00

3 00
1 00
13 00

1 00
0 04
0 09
0 04
0 04
0 88
0 20
0 88
4 10
0 28
0 60
1 00
] 00
0 60
0 50
14 00
0 21
MEAN
-9 00
1 00
2 00
-9 00
2 95
3 30
14 00
-9 00
0 63
0 61
-9 00
6 50
0 02
0 09
0 00
0 31
-9 00
8 00
0 81
0 02
-9 00

4 00
1 00
2 80

0 80
0 04
0 09
0 04
0 04
-9 00
0 20
0 88
0 23
0 12
0 15
0 33
0 58
0 35
0 2S
0 03
0 21
SATING
0
J
0
9
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'

0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
                                                     C-3

-------
?AGE  4
                                          PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATS BASE
                                             POSITIVES BY STATE 8Y CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
DBCP
OBCP
Oieldrin
Dieidrin
EDS
EDB
EDB
Hexazinone
Hexazinone
Methylene chloride
MethyLene chiocide
Simazine
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
STATE LA
2,4-D
Alachioc
Alachloc
Pdachlor
Alachloc
Aiachloc
Alacnlor
Aiachior
Alachlor
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Carbofuran
Chlocdane
C
5
-9
-9
11
3
-9
9
2
2
1
1
1
1

-9
22
1
I
6
1
3
-9
-9
39
104
1
16
12
1
2
2
24
-9
-9
-9
-9
3
24
1
• 7
I
2
7
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 02
0 00
0 03
0 05
0 06
4 00
3 90
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

-9 00
0 05
0 00
0 00
3 30
0 00
0 09
0 00
0 00
0 04
0 10
0 00
0 10
0 10
0 00
2 20
2 00
0 10
0 00
0 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 10
0 07
0 00
0 12
0 00
0 26
0 10
MAXIMUM
0 40
0 20
0 01
0 10
300 00
11 00
0 07
0 70
0 56
19 00
11 00
0 10
0 20
0 20
0 20

0 40
0 63
6 00
0 10
16 50
0 18
11 00
55 00
2 70
1 10
5 10
10 00
0 85
1 60
4 10
4 40
2 90
13,00
0 50
0 U
0 60
1 80
0 20
1 20
0 50
0 48
0 69
0 34
1 40
	 - j>r LKH
MEAN SATING
0 04 0
0 06 0
0 00 0
0 10 0
0 04 0
1 08 0
0 05 D
-9 00 5
0 19 0
11 50 0
7 45 3
0 10 0
0 20 0
0.20 0
0 20 0

-9 00 0
0 31 1
6 00 I
0 10 L
10 97 [
0 18
-9 00 L
0 86 0
0 08 0
0 22 1
0 59 1
10 00 1
Q 34 [
0 31 1
4 10 1
3 30 L
2 50 1
-9 00 1
0 02 0
0 00 0
-9 00 0
-9 00 0
0 14 i
0 36 i
0 50 1
0 32
0 69
0 30
-9 00
                                                        C-4

-------
PAGE  5
                                          PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                             POSITIVES SV STATE 3V CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
C/anazine
Oicamba
Dieldrin
Foncfos
Fonofos
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
Metnbuzin
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
Sulprofos
Terbufos
Terbufos
Terbufos
Terbufos
Terbufos
STATE ID
2,4-0
Aldicacb
3HC
Chiordane
Chlordane
DDT
DOT
Dicamba
Dieldrin
Heptachlor
Hexac h 1 orobenzen*
Lindane
HalatJnon
Methyl pacathion
PCNB
POP
Silvex
Tnaliate
STATE [L
Machlor
REFERENCE
NUMBER
IA005
IA005
IA005
IA001
IA004
IA001
IA001
IA002
IA003
IA004
IA002
IA002
IA003
IAOOJ
IA004
IA005
IA005
IAOOJ
IAOOJ
IAOOJ
IAOOJ
IAOOJ
IAOOJ

10001
US902
IDOOl
ID001
ID001
ID001
IDOOL
IDOOl
ID001
LDQ01
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOl
IDOOi

IL001
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FTPS
1
i
L
2
1
2
J
2
3
{
i
2
1
3
1
I
2
1
1
2
3
4
5

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i

1
091
091
09 L
043

043
065
131
OJ5

067
131
021
035

091
091
021
021
041
035
193
141

2B
Oil
2S
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B
28
2B
2B
2B
28
as
2B
2B
2B

5B
ORIGIN
PS
PS
PS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
NFU
PS
PS
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU

PS
NFU
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS
PS

NFU
WELLS
NO / POS
4 /
4 /
4 /
1 /
70 /
1 /
1 /
15 /
9 /
70 /
8 /
15 /
2 /
9 /
70 /
4 /
1 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
9 /
9 /
3 /

55 /
23 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
55 /
51 /

25 /
4
4
4
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1

46
1
10
1
1
17
7
17
33
1
3
I
1
1
19
40
9
8

19
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
108 /
70 /
108 /
1 /
50 /
12 /
70 /
40 /
50 /
3 /
12 /
70 /
-9 /
35 /
3 /
3 /
2 /
12 /
9 /
4 /

107 /
23 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
101 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
107 /
93 /

25 /
-9
-9
-9
1
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
13
1
2
2
-9
-9
20
3
1
1
2
2

84
1
11
1
3
19
9
21
51
1
3
2
I
1
3J
65
11
9

19
CONCENTRATIONS (
MINIMUM
0 00
0 00
0 00
0,00
0 U
0 25
0 00
0 00
4 50
0 32
0 09
0 10
0 00
0 44
0 29
0 00
0 00
1.30
O.JO
0 00
0 00
1 70
4 80

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 02
MAXIMUM
30 00
12 00
0 03
0 11
0 90
0 62
0 25
0 11
7 30
7 80
0 15
4 30
I 40
0 75
1 10
0 41
0 15
1 40
12 00
1 20
11 00
2 90
5 90

36 50
2 00
0.02
0 04
0 02
0 54
0 76
0 49
0 09
0 02
0 01
0 08
5 20
0 01
0 22
0 05
0 62
0 13

0 33
PPB)
MEAN
3 32
0 31
0 00
0 11
-9 00
0 43
0 25
0 11
5 90
4 86
0 12
1 83
1 40
0.59
0 70
0 06
0 00
1 35
7 40
1 20
11 00
1 90
5 40

0 93
2 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 02
0 02
0 02
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 03
0 00
0 02
0 01
0 01
0 01

0 16
rONFIRM
WING
0
0
0
1
i



]_
1
1
i
1
1
1
0
0
1
4
4
4
4
4

2
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

5
                                                        C-5

-------
PACE  6
                                           PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                              POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Alachlor
Aldrin
Atrazine
Acrazine
Atrazine
C.llordane
Chlorpyrifos
Cyanazme
DOT
Diazinon
Dieldrin
Endrin
Heptachlor
Lindane
Metolachloc
Metolachlor
Metribuzin
Metribuzm
Metribuzin
Propacnlor
Simazine
Tn.fluraJ.in
Tnfluralin
STATE IN
Alacnlor
STATE KS
2,4,5-T
2,4-D
2,4-0
2.4-D
Alacnlor
Alachlor
Alachloc
Aiachlor
Alachloc
Aiachlor
Alachlor
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
REFERENCE
NUMBER
ILQOJ
IL001
I LOO 2
IL003
WIQ07
IL001
TLOOl
[LOCI
[L001
IL001
IL002
IL002
IL001
IL001
IL003
WI007
IL001
IL002
IL003
IL002
IL002
ILOOL
IL002

LNooi

KS001
KS001
KS001
KSOOl
K3XJ1
RS001
KSOOl
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KS001
KSOOl
KS001
KSOOl
KS001
KSOOl
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1

2
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
!
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
B
5B
125
B
017
58
58
5B
SB
SB
125
125
5B
SB
B
017
SB
125
B
125
125
5B
125

9B

201
N/A
121
201
103
133
117
117

079
149
N/A
N/A
N/A
039
039
027
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
N/A
N/A
N/A
SFU
SFU
N/A
WELLS
NO / PCS
368 /
25- /
28 /
368 /
-9 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
28 /
23 /
25 /
25 /
368 /
-9 /
25 /
28 /
368 /
28 /
23 /
25 /
28 /

24 /

1 /
-9 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
1 /
1 /
1 /
2
7
8
J
1
21
18
10
18
6
12
16
16
3
1
1
19
7
1
2
8
8
9

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMPLES
NO / POS
366 /
25 /
79 /
J68 /
-9 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
25 /
111 /
111 /
25 /
25 /
368 /
-9 /
25 /
79 /
368 /
79 /
79 /
25 /
79 /

25 /

1 /
-9 /
2 /
1 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2
7
12
3
-9
21
18
10
18
6
26
61
16
3
1
-9
19
11
1
2
12
8
14

2

1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
CONCENTRATIONS 1PPB)
MINIMUM MAXIMUM
0 01
0 01
1 07
0 40
-9 00
0 01
0 01
0 01
0 01
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 04
0 01
0.00
-9 00
0 01
0 01
0.00
0 22
1 07
0 08
0 01

1 10

0 00
0 00
0 CO
0 00
2 40
0 38
0 00
0 00
0 90
6 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
7 40
7 40
3 40
6 SO
0 11
7 30
2 50
4 80
0 06
0 09
0 08
0 05
0 08
0 08
0 67
0 81
0 20
6 00
10 00
0 18
0 11
0 60
2 98
7 30
1 70
0 14

2 80

1 10
0 80
22 00
I 30
6 20
I 30
0 39
0 69
1 40
12 00
1 80
2 10
I 20
2 50
40 00
40 00
4 60
	 ^~^r .^n
MEAN RATING
3 30 1
0 04 5
3 27 0
1 JO I
-9 00 3
0 03 5
0 05 5
0 03 5
0 03 5
0 05 5
0 10 3
0 02 0
0 19 5
0 07 5
6 00 1
-9 00 0
0 08 5
0.05 0
0 60 1
1 60 0
3 27 0
0 74 5
0 03 0

-9 00 0

1 10 1
0 80 L
22 00 1
L 30 1
4 30 I
1 34 1
0 30 I
0 69
i is :
9 00 1
1 80 1
2 10 :
1 20
2 50
23 70 L
23 70
4 00
                                                           06

-------
   PAGE
                                              PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                 POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazme
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atcazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Bromacii
Bromacii
Btomacii
Brociacii
Bromacil
Bronaci 1
Chlcrdane
Chlordane
Chlorda/ie
Dieidnrt
Dieldrin
Endosulfan
Endosulfan
Heptachlor
Hetolachlor
Hetolachior
Hetolachior
Netolachioc
Hetolachlor
Metolachior
Metribimn
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
Hetribuzin
Picioram
Propazine
Tcifluralin
Trifluralin
Tn'luraiin
REFERENCE
NUMBER
KSOOl
KSOOL
KSOOl
KS001
K3001
KSOOl
KS001
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KS001
KS001
KSOOl
KS003
KS002
KSOQ1
KSOOl
KS001
KSOOl
KS001
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOL
KSOOl
KS002
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOl
KSOOi
KSOOl
KS002
KSOOl
KSOOL
KSOOl
SUB-REF
NUMBER
2
2
j
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
I
2
3
3
J
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
J
1
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
•COUNTY
FIPS
085
117
11?
163


079
149
149

041
015
155
N/A
193
191
079
079
149
043
041
1J9
121
133
1J3
115
021
021
133
027

079
015
155
193
103
079
015
155
053
19 J
103
013
013
ORIGIN
SFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
SPS
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
SFU
SFU
SFU
N/A
SFU
SPS
N/A
SPS
N/A
SPE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
see
see
N/A
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
N/A
SPS
SFU
SPS
SPS
N/A
N/A
SPS
SFU
N/A
N/A
WELLS
NO / POS
I / 1
1 / 1
i / I
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
84 / 2
56 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / L
1 / 1
1 / 1
I / 1
1 / 1
1 / I
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
1 / t
1 / 1
I / 1
1 / I
I / 1
1 / 1
56 / I
1 / I
I / 1
1 / I
1 f I
1 / 1
56 / i
I f 1
1 / 1
i / 1
SAMPLES
NO / POS
2 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
2 1
2 /
2 f
2 /
2 /
I /
1 /
1 /
1 /
84 /
57 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
1 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
2 /
2 /
I /
1 /
57 /
2 /
2 /
1 /
1 /
2 /
57 /
2 /
2 /
2 / .
CONCENTRATIONS CPPB)

2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
I
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
I
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
MINIMUM
4 10
1 50
0 00
0 CO
3 40
0 00
11 00
0 CO
0 CO
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 40
-9 00
0 00
3 30
16 00
0 00
0 00
0 CO
0 31
6 90
0 47
0 10
0 22
0 03
0 00
0 02
0 00
0 34
1 00
0 00
0 00
-9 00
0 00
0 16
0 00
0 00
3 30
-9 00
0,37
0 53
2 70
MAXIMUM
4 10
3 10
1 60
1 SO
5 30
2 20
16 00
L 70
2 00
1 70
5 60
16 00
3 20
2 20
1470 00
I 10
5 50
17 00
1 20
0 38
9 50
0 33
7 90
0 58
0 11
0 26
0 06
0 03
0 03
0 61
I SO
1 £0
4 60
4 90
150.00
0 IS
0 18
2 10
0 13
5 60
2 50
2 20
3 70
5 40
MEAN
4 10
2 30
1 60
1 30
4 35
2 2C
L3 5C
1 7C
2 00
1 7C
5 5C
16 00
3 20
1 80
-9 00
1 10
4 40
16 50
1 20
0 J8
9 50
0 32
7 40
0 53
0 11
0 24
0 04
0 03
0 03
0 61
0 92
1 30
4 60
4 90
-9 00
0 15
0 17
2 10
0 13
4 45
-9 00
1 28
2 12
4 05
CONFIRM
RATING

I


i
i

1
[


I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
[



i
[

1
i
I
|
1
3
i
1
1
1
.
I
1
1
I
STATE  LA
Alachlot
                          LAOOl
                                             128
                                                      NFU
                                                                12 /    1
                                                                             -9 /  -9
                                                                                             0 00
                                                                                                       0 28
                                                                                                               -9 00
                                                            C-7

-------
PACE  8
                                          PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                             POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Cyanazine
STATE MA
1,2-0
2,4-D
2,4-Dichlobenzoic ac
Slachlor
Aldicacb
Mdicarb
Aldicarb
Mdicarb
Aldicarb
Carbofucan
Chlordane
Chlorothalonil
Chlocpyrifos
DactJial
DicamDa
Dinoseb
EDS
Heptachlor
Isofenphos
Oxamyl
TCP
STATE MD
1,2-D
1,2-0
Alachlor
Alachlor
Atcaton
Atcazine
Atrazine
Cvanazine
DBCP
DBCP
Simazine
Trifiucalin
STATE *E
AJachlor
Aldicacb
Aldicarb
Aldicarb
REFERENCE
NUMBER
LA001

MA001
MA002
MA002
MA001
MA001
MA901
MA901
MA901
MA902
MA001
MA002
KA002
MA002
HA002
MA002
MA001
MA001
MA002
MA002
MA001
MA002

MD001
MD002
MDOOJ
K0004
MDOOJ
MD003
MDOM
MDOM
wool
MD002
MD003
HD003

ME002
ME901
ME901
ME902
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
1

1
I
1
I
i
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

I
1
1
1
12B

3
001
001
3
9
6B
6B
6B

8
001
001
001
001
001
8
B
001
001
B
001

045
N/A
38
033
IB
3B
033
033
045
N/A
IB
8B


003
019
2B
ORIGIN
NFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

NFU
NFU
NFTJ
NFU
NFTJ
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO / PCS
L2 /

239 /
17 /
17 /
147 /
146 /
52 /
162 /
84 /
22 /
H6 /
17 /
17 /
17 /
17 /
17 /
147 /
239 /
L7 /
L7 /
146 1
n /

36 /
6 /
30 /
15 /
30 /
JO /
15 /
15 /
36 /
6 /
JO /
.'0 /

S3 /
98 /
V /
48 /
I

82
1
10
5
59
16
41
11
12
23
7
2
1
3
L
10
36
4
1
1
1

10
4
4
15
1
3
15
12
3
3
1
1

1
194
23
20
SAMPLES
M3 / PCS
-9 /

239 /
60 /
60 /
147 /
146 /
53 /
190 /
117 /
131 /
146 /
59 /
59 /
59 /
119 /
60 /
147 /
2J9 /
59 /
59 /
U6 /
60 /

48 /
6 /
36 /
107 /
36 /
36 /
166 /
123 /
48 /
6 /
36 /
36 /

159 /
283 /
125 /
48 /
-9

82
1
21
5
59
-9
-9
-9
27
23
14
2
1
4
I
10
36
8
1
1
2

23
4
4
20
1
3
125
16
9
3
1
1

1
516
i9
20
COtCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 00

0 03
0 00
0 21
0 20
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
0 13
0 22
0 00
0 21
0 00
0 36
0 03
0 03
0 00
0 00
0 10

1 00
6 00
0.10
0 00
0 00
0 40
0 00
0 00
2 00
6 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
2 00
MAXIMUM
o la

51 00
0 J4
32 00
4 40
44 20
41 10
50 00
27 00
23 00
36 60
3 63
0 J8
0 10
1 07
0 06
36 70
6 90
0 12
1 17
1 00
0 76

440.00
53 00
0 80
1 00
0 10
0 90
9 50
3 60
13 00
12 00
0 10
0 10

0 19
77 00
59 00
14 00
MEAN
-9 00

-9 00
0 34
4 29
-9 00
-9 00
21 10
11.60
10 20
7 40
-9 00
0 88
0 JO
0 10
0 46
0 06
-9 00
-9 00
0 05
1 17
-9 00
0 43

67 60
26 75
0 40
0 33
0 10
0 60
1 96
0 63
6 20
9 00
0 10
0 10

0 19
-9 00
-9 00
7 20
:CNF:R.M
RATING


i
0
T


0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
i
2

0
•",
1
1
1
1
I
I
0
0
'.
1

2
Q
T
0
                                                       C-8

-------
PACE  9
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA 3ASE
                                              POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Aldicarb
Atrazine
Chiorcthaioml
Dicamba
Dinoseb
ETU
Endosulfan
Hexazinone
MeUiamidophos
Metribuzin
Picioram
STATE HI
Atrazine
Atrazine
Simazine
Simazine
STATE ft)
2,4,5-T
2,4-D
Aiactiioc
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Atrazine
Cyanazine
Cyanazine
Dicamba
Dicamba
EPTC
MCPA
Metolacnlor
Metribuzin
Metribuzin
PCP
Picloram
Propachlor
Simazine
STATE MS
2.4-0
Aidrin
ArocMor
8HC
REFERENCE
NUMBER
US900
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002
ME002

MI001
MIOC1
MI001
MI001

MN002
KND02
MN002
Vt*X>2
HN002
**»2
MN002
(*«02
MN002
MN002
*«02
MO02
M002
M002
M002
MO02
M002
»*X2
MO02

MS001
MS001
MS001
MS001
SUB-REF COUNTY ORIGIN
NUMBER FTPS
U
1
I
I
L
1
1
1
I
1
1

1
i
V
1

2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
I
2
2
L

L
L
I
1
003











059
149
059
149

708
70B
358
708
35B
35B
35B
708
35B
70S
70B
70B
70B
35B
70B
3SB
708
70B
35B

10B
10B
108
LOB
NFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
WELLS
NO / PCS
4 /
88 /
88 /
71 /
38 /
24 /
88 /
88 /
38 /
88 /
88 /

7 /
17 /
7 /
17 /

400 /
400 /
100 /
400 /
21 /
100 /
100 /
400 /
100 /
400 /
400 /
400 /
400 /
100 /
400 /
100 /
400 /
400 /
100 /

14J /
143 /
143 /
143 /
3
1
1
I
7
3
2
2
9
4
1

6
4
3
1

1
7
8
8
2
47
3
1
1
3
1
2
2
4
2
3
3
2
1

2
1
2
6
SAMPLES
NO / POS
4 /
159 /
159 /
126 /
159 /
24 /
159 /
159 /
45 /
159 /
159 /

35 /
19 /
35 /
19 /

525 /
525 /
400 /
525 /
54 /
400 /
400 /
525 /
400 /
525 /
525 /
525 /
525 /
400 /
525 /
400 /
525 /
525 /
400 /

143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
3
1
I
1
8
3
2
2
10
4
1

12
6
5
1

1
12
9
14
5
112
3
1
4
6
1
4
2
4
3
3
5
2
4

2
1
2
6
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
1 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 06
3 10
0 22
7 00
0 09
0 01
0 00

1 00
15 00
V 00
0 00

0 00
0 07
0 16
0 07
0 50
0 01
0 18
0 00
0 53
0 05
0 00
0 13
0 30
0 12
0 10
0 42
0 08
0 20
0 49

7 90
0 00
269 00
1 40
MAXIMUM
23 00
0 40
0 02
1 10
2 30
4 SO
0 40
9 00
10 50
0 66
1 40

210 00
107 00
16 00
11 00

0 21
5 70
2 31
4 03
30 60
42 40
2 90
0 80
0 86
0 21
0 33
2.20
0 55
0 78
1 05
0 64
0 63
0 50
2 58

49 50
0 01
2300 00
4 25
(PPB)
MEAN
U 70
0 40
0 02
L 10
0 67
3 90
0 31
a oo
4 80
0 16
1 40

44.38
39 50
7 60
11 00

0 21
0 22
0 37
0 44
9 00
0 38
0 22
0 80
0 66
0 10
0 33
0 26
0 42
0 41
0.23
0 58
0 16
0 35
1 40

2 70
0 00
1285 00
2 70
CONFIRM
BATING
0
2
2
L
c.
5
2
2
2
7
2

0
0
0
0

!

1

1
i
[
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
\

i_

L

;

                                                      09

-------
PAGE 10
                                         PESTICIDES TO GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                            POSITIVES BY STATE 8Y CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Chlordane
DOT
DOT
Diazinon
Hexachlorobenzene
Lindane
Malathion
Methyl parathion
PCP
TDE
Toxaphene
Tnfluralin
p-Ni trophenol
STATE KT
2,4-0
2,4-D
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Dicamba
MCPA
Picloram
STATE NC
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Atrazine
Metalaxyl
STATE ND
Aiachlor
Parathion
Picloram
Piclocaja
Picloraw
Picloran
Trifluralin
STATE HE
Aiachlor
Aiachlor
REFEREfCE
NUtBER
MS001
MS001
HS001
MS001
MS001
MS001
KSOOL
KS001
MS001
MS001
MS001
MS001
MS001

MTOOL
MTOOl
MTOOl
MTOOl
MTOOl
MTOOI
MTOOl

NC901
NC901
US900
US901
NC001
NC002

WOM
rcooi
wnoi
ND002
rcoo2
ND003
N0001

NEOOI
NEOC2
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
1
1
1
1
1
1
L
1
1
1
1
1
1

5
6
6
8
5
5
S

L
1
15
8
1
1

1
1
I
1
1
1
1

L
2
LOB
108
1DB
10B
10B
10B
10B
LOB
10B
10B
LOB
10B
LOB

099
111
111
009
099
099
099

88
88
131
2B
081
065

021
52B
52B
079
079
5B
52B

4B
L2B
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
SFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
N/A

NFU
NFU
NFJ
NFU
SPS
N/A
SPS

SPS
NFU
WELLS
NO /
143 /
L43 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
L43 /
143 /
14J /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /

13 /
10 /
16 /
14 /
13 /
13 /
13 /

13 /
32 /
2 /
19 /
5 /
-9 /

95 /
45 /
92 /
126 /
126 /
188 /
L /

47 /
14 /
POS
2
3
4
7
4
5
2
6
101
2
2
1
j

4
1
1
6
5
3
2

3
5
2
1
2
-9

1
2
7
11
11
7
i

L
2
SAMPLES
NO / POS
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /
143 /

50 /
11 /
L7 /
25 /
50 /
50 /
50 /

13 /
90 /
2 /
19 /
-9 /
11 /

171 /
45 /
92 /
137 /
137 /
486 /
I /

47 /
14 /
2
3
4
7
4
5
2
6
101
2
2
1
3

5
1
2
10
6
3
7

3
8
2
1
-9
3

3
2
7
15
15
19
I

L
2
CONCENTRATIONS
MINIMUM
1 60
2 00
6 00
12 00
3 90
0 50
30 00
10 00
2 20
3 30
L50 00
-9 00
4.00

0 11
0 00
-9 00
0 00
0 06
0 36
0 06

1 50
1 00
0 50
0 00
20 00
0 27

0 20
0 02
0 08
0 02
0 02
0 10
0 00

0 01
0 02
MAXIMUM
1 80
5 50
402 00
478 00
5 60
47 00
53 00
256 00
149 00
6 20
4910 00
-9 00
20 00

0 39
1 70
-9 00
2 90
3 00
5 50
16.00

1 50
28 20
0 50
2 00
212 00
1 40

1 20
0 04
1.44
3 56
3 56
12 80
0 03

0 02
0 07
(PPB)
MEAN
1 70
3 30
108 00
162 00
4 70
11 10
4L 50
88 40
18 30
4 80
3205 00
-9.00
12 80

0.23
1 70
-9 00
L 12
0 82
2 33
2 67

1 50
8 90
0 50
2 00
140 00
1 00

0 83
0 03
0 43
0 40
0 40
3 40
0 03

0 01
0 04
:CNFIRM
RATING

L
1
1
1
1

L
[_

\L
1
1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1
1
0
0
0
0

0
1
I
0
1
1
[

I
1
                                                     C-10

-------
f ftoe 1 1
CHEMICAL
Alachlor
Alacnior
Alachlor
Alachlor
Alachlor
Aldicarb
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atcazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Acrazine
Cyanazine
Oieldrin
Fonofos
P ropaz i ne
Simazine
Trif lucalin
PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
REFERENCE
NUMBER
NE002
NE003
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NE901
NE001
NE002
NE002
NE002
NE002
NE002
NE002
NE002
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE003
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NE004
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NEOOS
NC003
NE002
NE003
NE002
NE002
NE003
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
12B
047
107
179
037

4B
12B
12B
12B
12B
12S
12B
12B
065
099
063
047
019
137
083
121
157
047
001
035
081
089
079
107
167
177
143
185
159
059
151
169
047
047
128
061
12B
128
019
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO / POS
17 /
451 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
15 /
47 /
57 /
14 /
18 /
21 /
21 /
16 /
17 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
451 /
17 /
451 /
57 /
57 /
451 /
2
1
1
1
1
1
13
18
14
16
21
21
4
17
1
1
1
6
4
3
1
8
1
2
2
5
6
4
7
1
1
1
7
6
7
1
3
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
SAMPLES
NO / POS
34 /
451 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
111 /
47 /
57 /
14 /
18 /
116 /
40 /
22 /
59 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
451 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
399 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
491 /
451 /
34 /
451 /
57 /
5? /
451 /
2
1
1
1
1
1
13
18
14
16
116
40
4
46
1
1
1
6
4
3
1
8
1
2
2
5
6
4
7
1
1
1
7
6
7
1
3
1
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 10
0 38
0 30
0 05
0 OL
0 02
0 02
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 12
0 41
0 20
0 00
0 30
0 00
1 43
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 40
0 62
0 CO
0 00
0 00
0 13
0 23
0 27
0 00
0 16
0 00
0 30
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
MAXIMUM
0 07
0 32
0 95
2 96
20 60
3 00
1 12
2 30
3 12
6 96
2 02
0 99
0 10
14 72
0 41
0 32
0 16
Q 65
3 70
107 20
0 23
6 24
0 82
2 00
0 90
0 50
0 50
22 70
3 00
0 36
0 17
0 53
1 70
1 40
1 56
0 21
0 23
0 57
0 50
3 20
0 01
0 06
0 10
0 10
0 42
MEAN
0 04
0 82
0 95
2 96
20 60
3 00
0 08
-9 00
0 75
1 15
0 39
0 25
0 06
1 02
0 41
0 32
0 16
0 47
2 30
36 10
0 23
1 80
0 82
1 20
0 40
0 30
0 30
4 90
1 60
0 36
0 17
0 58
0 50
0 50
0 70
0 21
0 20
0 57
0 35
3 20
-9 00
0 06
0 10
0 10
0 42
BATING
i
i
i
!
i
3
1
i.
i

L
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

L
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
i
1
1
1
1







STATE  NJ





Aldicarb
NJ901
                 2B
                          NFU
                                  46 /   2
68 /
                                                              3  LO
                                                                     31 00
                                                                              14  30
                                                   C-ll

-------
PACE 12
                                         PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA 3ASE
                                            POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
.Aidicarb
Aldicirb
Atrazine
DDT
Dieldrin
Lindane
Simazane
STATE MM
3HC
DDT
DDT
PCP
STATE NY
1,2-0
1,2-0
1,3-D
1,3-0
1,3-D
2,4-0
2.4-0
Aiachlor
Alachlor
Alachlor
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aldrin
Atrazine
Atrazine
Caroaryl
Carbof'jra/i
Chlorottialoml
Crvolite
Cyajiazine
Dacthal
Dinoseb
REFERENCE
NUMBER
NJ902
NJ902
NJ002
NJ002
NJ002
NJ002
NJ002

1*001
NM001
NM001
NHOOl

NY006
NY009
NY006
NY007
NY008
NY003
NY010
NY004
NY009
NY010
NY002
NY 009
NY 901
NY901
NY901
NY901
HTML
NY902
NY903
U5900
NY009
NY 004
WI007
NY009
NY009
NY009
NY009
NY004
NY009
NY009
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
1
1
1
1
1

1

1
1
1
1

1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
14
2
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
3B
3B
2B
2B
2B
2B
2B

001
001
001
JIB

103
L03
103
103
103
48
L9B
083
103
19B
103
103
101
117
019
033
029
103
117
117
103
083
115
103
103
103
103
083
103
103
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

NFU
SFU
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
-9
PS
N/A
-9
NFU
SFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
PS
SPS
N/A
SFU
SFU
N/A
PS
SFU
SFU
WELLS
NO / POS
3 / 2
6 / 1
66 / 3
66 / 1
66 / 1
66 / 1
66 / 2

-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9

8 / 1
-9 / -9
a / i
i / i
i / i
51 / 4
48 / 2
17 / 15
-9 / -9
48 / 1
-9 / 2
-9 / -9
28 / 3
9 / 1
2 / 2
14 / 5
16 / 8
170 / 122
25 / 12
4 / 1
-9 / -9
27 / 25
1 / 1
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
10 / 1
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
SAMPLES
NO / POS
3 /
6 /
66 /
66 /
66 /
66 /
66 /

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-5 /

72 /
3500 /
72 /
1 /
1 /
51 /
-9 /
58 /
36 /
-9 /
-9 /
34000 /
28 /
9 /
2 /
14 /
18 /
510 /
219 /
4 /
170 /
99 /
2 /
25000 /
2
1
3
1
1
1
2

-9
9
9
-9

4
250
4
1
1
4
-9
42
1
-9
2
0
3
1
2
5
10
270
30
1
1
82
2
36
26000 /7000
67 /
99 /
17 /
213 /
66 /
11
7
1
56
6
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
4 00
0 00
0 10
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 10

-9.00
-9 00
-9 00
-9.00

5 00
1 00
37 00
0 00
0 00
0 50
0 20
0 04
0 00
0 80
-9 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
5 00
2.00
2 00
1 00
1.00
0 00
0 00
0 12
70 00
-9 00
1 00
1 10
0 30
0 00
1 00
0 60
MAXIMUM
50 00
3 00
0 50
3 07
0 02
0 05
0 10

-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

10 00
550 00
270 00
130 00
72 00
0 56
0 50
16 00
0 30
0 80
-9 00
315 00
2 00
2 00
6 00
30 00
32 00
217 00
111 00
1 00
0 53
150O 00
170 00
-9 00
116 00
12 60
1 79
t 00
1039 00
4 50
MEAN
27 00
3 00
-9 CO
0 07
0 02
0 05
0 10

-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

7 75
-9 00
123 00
130 00
72 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 78
0 80
0 80
-9 00
18 30
1 30
2 00
5 50
9 80
9 20
33 20
25 40
1 00
0 53
55 20
120 00
-9 00
7 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
109 00
-9 00
RATING
0
0
L
1
1
1
i

o
0
0
0

1
1
1
0
3
0
J
2
0
0
5
i
3
3
3
3
3
5
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
I
0
2
I
L
                                                    C-12

-------
PAGE 13
                                          PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA 8ASE
                                             POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
ED8
Endosulfan
ELhoprop
Lindane
Methcmyl
Methcmyl
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Haled
Oxamvl
Paraquat
Picloram
STATE OR
Aldicarb
Dae thai
STATE PA
Alachlor
Alachlor
Alachlor
Attazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
AtcaEine
Atrazine
Carbofucan
Cyanazine
Cyanazine
Metolacnlor
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Metolachlor
Propazine
Simazine
Simazine
Simazine
STATE RI
Aidicarb
Aldicarb
Aldicarb
Carbar/1
Carboiuran
REFERENCE
NUMBER
NY009
NY003
NY009
NY009
NYQ09
asooi
NY004
WI007
NY009
NY009
NY009
NY009

US900
OR001

PA001
PA003
PA004
PA001
PA002
PA003
PA004
PAOOS
PA006
PAO02
PA003
PA001
PA003
PA004
PA005
PMXI3
PA001
PA002
PA003

RI901
RI902
SI 902
FU902
RI901
SUB-REF COUNTY'
NUMBER FIPS
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
j
2
1
2
2

7
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1

1
I
1
1
1
103
4B
103
103
103
075
083
115
L03
103
L03
103

059
045

2B
8
B
2B
B
8
B
on
N/A
B
B
28
B
B
Oil
B
2B
B
B

009
28
2B
2B
009
ORIGIN
SFU
N/A
SFU
N/A
SFU
NFU
PS
SPS
N/A
SFU
N/A
N/A

NFU
NFU

N/A
NFU
SPS
N/A
NFU
NFU
SPS
N/A
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU

NF'J
N/A
V/A
N/A
NFU
WELLS
NO /
-9 /
46 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
A I
10 /
1 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

1 /
6 /

43 /
5J /
58 /
43 /
20 /
53 /
58 /
1 /
1 /
20 /
53 /
43 /
53 /
58 /
1 /
Si /
43 /
20 /
53 '

11 /
414 /
212 /
100 /
il /
POS
-9
4
-9
-9
-9
1
6
1
-9
-9
-9
-O

1
6

5
6
5
18
14
21
26
I
1
2
1
4
4
8
1
1
LO
7
12

7
52
48
1
6
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
5000 /
46 /
86 /
131 /
25000 /
32 /
17 /
1 /
32 /
25000 /
14 /
11 /

1 /
6 /

129 /
121 /
193 /
129 /
38 /
121 /
193 /
3 /
2 /
38 /
121 /
129 /
121 /
19J /
3 /
121 /
129 /
38 /
121 /

32 /
493 /
214 /
100 /
32 /
15
4
23
1
30
1
10
1
6
900
L
1

1
6

10
8
5
35
22
29
n
3
2
2
1
6
5
31
3
1
15
9
18

21
-9
-9
1
16
CONCEKTRATICNS
MINIMUM
0 40
0 05
0 18
0 00
1 00
-9 00
1 20
0 00
3 00
1 00
0 00
0 00

-9 00
0 11

0 05
0 10
0 08
0 20
0 01
0 20
0 10
0 82
4 00
0 00
0 00
0 10
0 20
0 10
1 20
0 00
0 20
0 01
0 20

9 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
1 00
MAXIMUM
14 00
0 21
12 60
0 13
9 00
1 30
112 00
200 00
•> oo
395 00
3 00
0 50

0 50
290 00

3 00
1 80
20 00
3 00
1 11
3 00
11 00
20 00
9 00
0 09
i 10
0 40
0 41
0 30
48 00
0 20
J 40
0 17
J 40

148 00
73 00
17 00
4 00
7 00
'PPB)
MEAN
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 13
-9 00
1 00
20 90
200 00
-9 00
7 20
3 00
0 50

0 50
-9 00

0 77
0 59
4 70
0 56
0 17
0 54
0 34
7 71
8 00
0 09
1 10
0 24
0 27
0 16
17 66
0 20
0 71
0 04
0 59

64 57
-9 00
-9 00
4 00
3 50
:ONF:=JM
RATING

3
1
0

o
2
0
3
1
0
0

0
0

1
2
2


2
2
'.
0
-
2
1
2
2
1
2
L
L
2


0
0
0
L
                                                     013

-------
  PACE .4
STATE  VA

2,4,5-T
                                            PESTICIDES  W OBOUND HATER DATA BASE
                                               POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Carbcfuran
Oxamyl
Cxajnyl
STATE 3C
Aidicarb
Aidicarc
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aldrin
DSCP
DDT
Lindane
STATE SB
2,4-0
Alachlor
Atrazine
Picioram
STSTE TX
2,4,5-T
2,4-06
Aidicarb
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arsenic
Arspnic
Arsenic
\rsenic
Atrazine
?;omba
Metoiachioc
Prometon
Tebuttiiuron
REFERENCE
NUMBER
RI902
RI901
RI902

US900
US902
US902
US902
5C001
5C002
SC001
SC001

SD001
SD001
SD001
SD001

TX003
TX003
US900
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX002
TX003
TXOOJ
TX003
TX003
TX001
SUB-REF COUWn
NUMBER FIPS
1 2B
1 009
1 2B

16 049
1 027
1 075
1 033
I 043
1 B
1 043
1 043

1 B
1 B
t B
1 B

1 093
1 093
9 3B
1 2B
2 B
3 219
3 303
3 003
3 317
3 165
3 305
3 445
3 437
3 375
3 045
3 Oil
1 207
1 207
1 093
I 275
1 309
ORIGIN
N/A
NFU
N/A

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
NFU

NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU

DC
DC
NFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DC
NFU
NFU
WELLS
NO / PCS
100 / 11
11 / 4
100 / 1

2 / 2
8 / 2
U / 1
13 / 1
27 / 23
81 / 13
27 / 27
27 / 15

-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9

75 / 1
75 / i
6 / 6
102 / 53
61 / I
6 / 4
12 / 5
2 / 2
2 / 1
2 / 2
2 / 1
2 / 1
2 / I
2 / 2
4 / t
1 / i
75 ' 1
Vj 1 I
75 / 1
75 / 2
2 / 2
SAMPLES
NO / POS
100 /
32 /
100 /

2 /
10 /
14 /
14 /
27 /
95 /
27 /
27 /

-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

80 /
80 /
6 /
341 /
61 /
6 /
12 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
2 /
4 /
i /
80 /
80 /
90 /
80 /
16 /
11
5
I

2
3
2
1
23
-9
27
15

-9
-9
-9
-9

2
1
6
236
1
4
5
2
1
2
1
1
t
2
1
1
2
1
i
1 4
13
CQNCEOTRATICNS (PPB)
MINIMUM
1 00
1 00
0 00

0 50
1 00
3 00
0.00
-9 00
0 01
0 06
-9 00

0 29
0.36
1 70
-9 00

2 66
0 00
1 00
28 00
0 00
10 00
10 00
32 00
0 00
15.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
13 00
0 00
0 00
4 90
0 00
0 00
5 20
0 00
MAXIMUM
19 00
2 00
2 00

1 00
2 00
4 00
3 00
0 05
1 00
0 16
0 02

0 80
6 70
7 10
a 30

2 99
0 23
2 00
585 00
33 00
13 00
17 00
35 00
100 00
16 00
12 00
33 00
15 00
16 00
17 00
11 00
20 90
0 88
5 50
29 60
380 00
MEAN
2 90
1 33
2 00

0 75
1 57
3 50
3 00
0,01
-9 00
0 04
0 01

-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

2 85
0 23
1 50
105 00
33 00
H 80
12 40
33 50
100 00
15 50
12 00
33 00
15 00
U 50
17 00
U 00
12 50
0 38
5 50
16 60
276 67
RATING
0

0

0
3
0
0
i
i
1
I

0
0
0
0

1
1
f*!
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
:
;

i

0
VA002
                  2B
                           SFU
                                                 -9 /  -9
                                                                -9 00
                                                                         -9 00
                                                                                  -9 00
                                                     C-14

-------
PAGE 15
                                                                                                                  -./2i,sa
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                              POSITIVES B1 STATE B'i  CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
2,4-D
Alachlor
AldicarD
Mdicarb
Aidicarb
Az i npttos -me thy 1
DBCP
Endosulfan
Glyphosate
Methyl, psrathion
Paraquat
Phosmet
Simazine
STATE VT
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Cyanazine
Metolachlor
Simazine
Simazine
STATE WA
Aidicarb
ED6
EC6
EOB
EDS
STATE WI
Alachlor
Alachlor
Machlot
Aidicarb
Aldicart
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
REFERENCE
NUMBER
VA002
VAQ02
US900
US901
US901
VA002
VA001
VA002
VA002
VAQ02
VAOC2
VS002
VA002

VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
VT002
^TO02
\ff002
VT002
VT002
VTOQ2

US900
W001
WW01
WOQl
W001

WI001
taooj
WIQ06
U5900
US901
US901
US901
WI001
SUB-REF COUWTY
NUMBER FIPS
1
t
10
6
7
)
1
1
I
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
1

8
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
U
3
4
5
1
2B
28
28
001
38
2B
183
2B
28
2B
28
2B
2B

001
005
009
017
OL9
025
027
017
027
025
003
009

2B
SB
5B
SB
SB

N/A
8
8
2B
097
98
28
N/A
ORIGIN
SFU
SFU
NFU
NFJ
NFU
SFU
SPS
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU
SFU

NFU
NFU
SFU
SDC
SFU
WU
SFU
SFU
SFU
OC
SFU
SFU

NFU
MFU
NFU
NFU
PS

NFU
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/U
HELLS
NO / POS
66 /
66 /
7 /
9 /
69 /
66 /
U /
66 /
66 /
66 /
66 /
66 /
66 /

39 /
20 /
21 /
1 /
15 /
18 /
29 /
17 /
29 /
18 /
14 /
21 /

2 /
35 /
14 /
5 /
24 /

26 /
42 /
733 /
16 /
188 /
169 /
20 /
53 /
U
0
4
4
12
15
2
29
6
13
0
I
26

1
1
1
1
I
1
3
2
1
1
1
1

1
5
3
1
5

1
9
60
16
34
23
11
33
SAHPLES
NO / POS
-9 /
-9 /
7 /
26 /
69 /
-9 /
13 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /

43 /
22 /
22 /
-9 /
19 /
21 /
37 /
20 /
31 /
21 /
16 /
22 /

2 /
47 /
20 /
6 /
38 /

26 /
147 /
733 /
31 /
218 /
235 /
32 /
53 /
-9
-9
4
11
12
-9
2
-9
-9
-9
-9
-9
-9

5
1
1
-9
1
4
7
3
1
1
1
1

1
14
7
2
11

1
30
60
28
39
81
22
33
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
-9 00
-9 00
0 50
1 00
1 00
-9 00
76 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

7 10
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 40
I 10
1 20
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 10
0 40
0 50
-9 00
1 00
I 00
1 00
MAXIMUM
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
20 00
3 00
-9 00
114 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 OC'
-9 00

15 4C
3 40
1 1C
24 OC
1 20
5 00
6 00
2 30
7 OC
3 20
3 40
2 80

1 00
4 30
1 37
0 00
5 70

1 00
113 00
3000 00
10 00
85 00
111 00
38 00
10.00
MEAN
-9 00
-9 00
0 60
10 00
3 30
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-Q -i
-s ;o
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00

9 50
3 40
0 00
24 00
I 20
3 50
3 23
3 20
7 00
3 20
3 40
2 80

1.00
0 92
0 50
0 32
0 82

1 OC
19 60
54 40
2 90
14 00
21 00
4 70
5 60
:ONFIRH
RATING
Q
0
0
Q
0
0
5
0
Q
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
L
I
1

•S
1
1
1
I

0
1
1
1
1

0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
                                                      015

-------
PACE 16
                                         PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                            POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAi
CHEMICAL
Aldicarta
Aidicarb
Aldicaco
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Mdicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Mdicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Aidicarb
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Atrazine
Butylate
Butylate
Butylate
Carbaryl
Carbofuran
Carbofura/i
Cartcfuran
Chloramben
Chloramben
Cyanazine
Cyanazine
Daedal
REFERENCE
NUMBER
WI003
WI901
WI90L
WI901
WI901
WI90L
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
WI901
HI901
WI902
WI90J
WI903
WI903
WI90J
WI90J
WI903
WI903
WI903
WI903
WI904
WI905
WI905
US002
WI001
WI002
WI002
WIOOJ
WOOH
WI005
W007
U8002
«002
WIOOJ
WI001
US002
WIOOl
WIOQ2
US002
WI002
US002
WI002
US002
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FIPS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
1
4
1
I
4
1
4
2
4
a
22B
22B
228
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
22B
N/A
9B
96
98
9B
96
9B
98
98
9B

137
137
3
N/A
388
38B
8
049
N/A
107
B
38B
38B
N/A
8
N/A
386
B
38B
B
38B
B
ORIGIN
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
NFU
N/A
NFU
SPS
SPS
NFU
PS
SPS
SPS
N/A
SPS
SPS
SPS
N/A
NFU
SPS
N/A
SPS
N/A
SPS
N/A
WELLS
NO /
35 /
72 /
58 /
6 /
26 /
98 /
73 /
421 /
3 /
8 /
2 /
58 /
27 /
116 /
176 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
L6 /
2 /
1 /
-9 /
26 /
201 /
-9 /
39 /
5 /
1 /
-9 /
-9 /
1 /
-9 /
53 /
-9 /
26 /
72 /
-9 /
16 /
-9 /
-9 /
-9 /
POS
23
3
13
1
6
9
15
102
1
L
1
10
5
62
103
14
I
2
11
5
1
5
3
40
6
2
1
-9
8
12
25
13
5
1
1
-9
1
17
2
-9
5
I
-9
1
-9
8
-9
SAMPLES
NO / POS
190 / 102
133 / 27
125 / 57
7 / 1
68 / 28
153 / 35
141 / 59
971 /4570
6 / 1
9 / 1
4 / 1
106 / 39
47 / 14
534 /4220
3300 / 893
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
16 / 6
14 / 7
7 / 6
349 / 50
26 / 8
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
161 / 76
6 / 6
1 / 1
-9 / -9
J8 / 14
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
-9 / -9
78 / 2
26 / 5
-9 / -9
29 / 2
-9 / -9
117 / 80
-9 / -9
10 / 1
CONCENTRATIONS (PPB)
MINIMUM
1 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
2 00
1 00
1 00
1 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
1 00
2 00
1.00
1 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
4 00
8 00
-9 00
1 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 10
22 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
2 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
MAXIMUM
no oo
20 00
10 00
1 00
52 00
12 00
62 00
111 00
1 00
25 00
1 00
7 00
33 00
72 00
221.00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
3 00
86 00
144 00
140 00
9 00
-9 00
-9 00
33 00
109 00
550 00
3000 00
2 90
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
7 00
12 00
-9 00
50 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
MEAN
8 96
5 10
4 20
1 00
12 60
3 30
9 50
15 80
1 00
25 00
1 00
3 50
18 40
15 50
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
4 00
29 40
62 00
-9 00
3 30
1 75
-9 00
5 40
58 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
2 90
-9 00
1 80
-9 00
7 00
15 00
-9 00
50 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
:CNFIRH
RATING

0
0
0
3
0
n
a
a
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
3
0
0
                                                  C-16

-------
PACE 17
                                         PESTICIDES IN GROUND  WATER DATA BASE
                                            POSITIVES BY STATE BY CHEMICAL
CHEMICAL
Dacthal
Dacthal
Dinoseb
Dinoseb
Dinoseb
Oisulfoton
EDB
EPTC
EPTC
Lmucon
Linuron
Metolachloc
Metolachlor
Metolachloc
Metolachlor
Metolachloc
Metolachloc
Metolachloc
Metnbuzin
Metribuzin
Hetribuzin
Metcibuzin
Picloram
Simazine
REFEREJCE
NUMBER
WI002
WI002
US002
W1001
WI002
wiool
WI002
US002
WI002
WI001
WI003
US002
WI002
WI002
WI003
WI004
WI005
WI007
US002
WI001
WI002
WI003
WI003
WI004
SUB-REF COUNTY
NUMBER FTPS
1
2
4
i
1
1
I
4
2
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
383
38B
a
N/A
386
N/A
386
3
38B
N/A
B
a
38B
38B
B
049
N/A
107
3
N/A
38B
B
3
049
ORIGIN
SPS
SPS
N/A
NFU
SPS
NFU
SPS
N/A
SPS
NFU
NFU
N/A
SPS
SPS
NFU
PS
SPS
SPS
N/A
NFU
SPS
NFU
NFU
PS
WELLS
NO /
3 /
-9 /
-9 /
26 /
103 /
26 /
27 /
-9 /
-9 /
26 /
21 /
-9 /
65 /
-9 /
31 /
5 /
1 /
-9 /
-9 /
25 /
S3 /
36 /
9 /
5 /
PCS
3
1
-9
9
2
14
3
-9
8
1
-9
-9
1
19
8
^
1
[
-9
13
2
20
-9
5
SAMPLES
NO / PCS
-9 /
-9 /
125 /
26 /
-9 /
26 /
-9 /
100 /
-9 /
26 /
-9 /
126 /
-9 /
-9 /
104 /
6 /
1 /
-9 /
104 /
26 /
-9 /
95 /
-9 /
6 /
-9
-9
3
9
-9
14
-9
9
-9
1
-9
34
-9
-9
28
6
1
-9
L
13
-9
41
-9
6
ONCENTRATICNS
MINIMUM
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
26 00
-9 00
4 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 00
1 30
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
0 20
1 80
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
1 00
-9 00
0 20
0 25
0 27
MAXIMUM
-9 00
-9 00
5 50
74 00
-9 00
100 00
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
3 00
2 70
88 00
-9 00
-9 00
12 00
157 00
8 70
1300 00
1 80
6 00
-9 00
6 80
49 00
2 20
(PPB)
MEAN
254 50
-9 00
-9 00
46 20
5 50
36 30
4 23
-9 00
-9 00
3 00
1 90
-9 00
55 00
-9 00
4 00
65 60
-9 00
-9 00
-9 00
2 00
1 80
1 34
16 60
L 30
CONFIRM
RATING
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
a
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
                                                  C-17

-------
                   APPENDIX D
SUTOfcRY ASSESSMENT SCRIED BY CHEMICAL BY CATEGORY

-------
PAGE  1
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET

NO
CHEMICAL 1
1
2
]
4
5
6
3646
3646
3564
365
283
N/A
CHEMICAL :
I
2
3
4
5
6
3348
3348
3346
283
283
N/A
CHEMICAL 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
11
11
tl
LI
11
N/A
CHEMICAL 2
1
2
J
4
5
6
998
783
382
604
203
75
CHEMICAL 2
I
2
3
4
5
6
2S97
2352
1767
1072
570
55
WELLS
/ PCS
,2-0
204
204
191
97
84
N/A
, 3-D
3
3
1
1
1
N/A
-Napthoi
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
,4,5-T
19
18
16
2
0
1
,4-0
86
38
25
13
4
46
SAWLES
RATIO NO

0 056 9605
0 056 9605
0 054 9510
0 266 3973
0 297 3878
N/A N/A

0 QOL 4534
0 001 4534
0 000 4532
0 004 378
Q 004 378
N/A N/A

0 000 32
0 000 32
0 000 32
0 000 32
0 000 32
N/A N/A

0 019 982
0 023 ' 902
0 042 316
0 003 788
0.000 262
0.013 80

0 013 JOSS
0 016 2978
0 014 1837
0 012 1661
0 007 637
0 836 107
/ POS

736
736
719
354
337
N/A

6
6
4
4
4
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

4
2
0
2
0
2

113
29
11
18
4
84
RATIO

0 , 077
0 077
0 076
0 089
0 087
N/A

0 001
0 001
0.001
0 Oil
o on
N/A

0.000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A

0.004
0.002
0 000
0 003
0.000
0 025

0 037
0 010
0 006
0 Oil
0 006
0 785
NO /

8
8
7
4
4
N/A

8
8
1
4
4
N/A

1
1
1
1
1
N/A

9
7
6
4
3
1

23
22
19
11
9
1
STATE
POS

8
6
5
3
3
N/A

2
2
1
1
1
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

4
3
1
2
0
1

13
10
7
4
2
1
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 750
3 750
0 714
0 750
0 750
N/A

0.250
0 250
0 143
0 250
0 250
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A

0 444
0 429
0 167
0.500
0 000
1 000

0 565
0 455
0 368
0 364
0 222
1 000
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
2 66

Q 00
0 -00
0 00
0 M
0 00
0 00
MAXIMUM

550 00
550 00
550 00
550 00
550 00
N/A.

270 00
270,00
270 00
270.00
270 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A

2 99
1 10
0 30
1 10
0 00
2 99

49 50
49 50
49 50
49 50
49 50
36 50
MINIMUM

C 00
0 00
0 CO
0.00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 CO
2 S5

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 93
MAXIMUM

152 00
152 00
67 SO
152 CO
7 75
N/A

130 00
130 00
123.00
123.00
123 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

2 85
1 LO
0 00
1 10
0 00
2 35

22 00
22 00
2 70
22 00
2 70
0 93
                                                   D-l

-------
PAGE  2
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS
RATIO
SAMPLES
NO / PCS.
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAX 2,4-DB
1
2
3
4
5
6
i=> I
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
75 1
0 013
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 013
CHEMICAL 2,4-Dichlobenzoic
1
2
3
4
5
6
17 10
17 10
17 10
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.588
0 588
0 588
N/A
N/A
N/A
80 1
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
80 1
acid
60 21
60 21
60 21
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 013
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
O.OIJ

0 350
0 350
0.350
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1

1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1

1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.000

1 000
1 000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00

0 21
0 21
0 21
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 23
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.2J

32 00
32 00
32 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 23
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.23

4 29
4 29
4 29
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 23
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 23

4.29
4 29
4 29
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL 4 -CUT
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 0
i 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Acephate
1
2
3
4
5
6
•154 0
454 0
454 0
36 0
36 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
493 0
493 0
493 0
67 0
67 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
3
3
3
2
2
N/A
'0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Acifluocfen
1
2
3
4
5
6
97 0
97 0
97 0
97 0
97 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
171 0
171 0
171 0
171 0
171 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2
2
2
2
2
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
                                                   D-2

-------
PAGE  3
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                          SIM1ARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
RATIO NO.
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Acroiein
1
2
3
4
5
6
49 0
49 0
49 0
40 0
40 0
N/A N/A
0 000 51
0 000 51
0 000 51
0 000 40
0 000 40
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0,00
0,00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Aiachlor
1
2
3
4
5
6
6231 202
5147 92
4521 67
4416 88
3870 64
181 25
0 032 7309
0 018 6123
0 015 4946
0 020 5290
0.017 4230
0.138 428
309
164
124
156
119
66
0 042
0.027
0 025
0 029
0.028
0 154
23
23
20
16
15
6
19
18
15
13
12
6
0 826
0.783
0 750
0.812
0.800
1 000
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
3000 00
113 00
113 00
113.00
113 00
99 90
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
66 50
62 30
62 30
62 30
62.30
66.50
CHEMICAL. Aldicarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
9576 1496
9297 1372
7169 1270
3064 114
1622 112
38 0
0 156 53264
0 148 52623
0 177 51975
0 037 36620
0.069 35972
0 000 38
13356
13082
13077
209
204
0
0 251
0 249
0 252
0 006
0 006
0 000
30
29
28
14
13
1
22
22
21
7
6
0
0 733
0 759
0 750
0 500
0 462
0.000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1264 00
1264 00
1264 00
315.00
315 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
66 40
66 40
66 40
64 57
64.57
0 00
CHEMICAL Aldrin
1
2
3
4
5
6
1681 33
1431 26
1377 26
435 24
435 24
55 0
0 020 1752
0.018 1591
0.019 1367
0.055 440
0.055 440
0.000 106
32
25
24
24
24
0
0.018
0.016
0 018
0 055
0 055
0 000
13
11
9
5
5
1
5
4
3
2
2
0
0 385
0.364
0 333
0 400
0 400
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 53
0 53
0 05
0 05
0 05
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 53
0 53
0 01
0 01
0 01
0 00
CHEMICAL Ajnetryn
I
2
3
4
5
6
177 0
177 0
177 0
126 0
126 0
N/A N/A
0 000 184
0 000 184
0 000 184
0 000 132
0 000 132
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
5
5
4
3
3
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
N/A
0 200
0 200
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 88
0.88
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 88
0 88
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
                                                    D-3

-------
PACE  4
                                                                                                    11/21/88
                                        PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                           SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL

SET —
NO
CHEMICAL
i 55
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 5=
CHEMICAL
1 L4
2 14
3 14
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
WELLS
/ POS
RATIO NO
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
A/nidi thion
3
N/A
N/A
N,A
N/A
0
Vinocarb
0
3
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N'/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106

0 000 14
0 000 14
0 000 14
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
i

I
I
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Anitraz
1 i
2 I
3 i
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
J
J
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
C 000 1
0 000 1
0 000 1
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Am it role
1 3
2 !
3 j
4 N/A
5 N>A
6 N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000 3
0 000 3
0 000 3
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/ft
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Anilazine
1 •'
2 r
3 n
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N, A
D
-1
-J
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
Q 000 52
0 000 52
0 000 52
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
i
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                   L>-4

-------
PACE  5
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMEOT BY CHEMICAL
                                                                                                  1L/21/88
SET
tCLLS
NO / POS
RATIO NO
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Arochloc
i
2
3
4
5
6
143 2
143 2
N/A N/A
143 2
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 014 143
0 014 143
N/A N/A
0.014 143
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
2
2
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
0 014
0 014
N/A
0 014
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
1 000
1 000
N/A
1 000
N/A
N/A
269 00
269 00
N/A
269 00
N/A
N/A
2300 00
2300 00
N/A
2300 00
N/A
N/A
1285 00
1285 00
N/A
1285 00
N/A
N/A
1285 00
:285 00
N/A
1285 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Arsenic
1
2
3
4
5
6
246 75
246 75
N/A N/A
246 75
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 305 1185
0 305 1185
N/A N/A
0.305 1185
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
258
258
N/A
258
N/A
N/A
0 218
0 218
N/A
0 218
N/A
N/A
2
2
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
0 500
0 500
N/A
0 500
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
N/A
N/A
585 00
585.00
N/A
585.00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
N/A
N/A
105 00
105.00
N/A
105 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Atraton
1
2
3
4
5
6
69 1
69 1
69 1
30 1
30 1
N/A N/A
0 014 77
0 014 77
0 014 77
0 033 36
0 033 J6
N/A N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0 013
0.013
0 013
0 028
0 028
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0 500
0 500
0 500
1 000
1 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 10
0 10
0 10
0.10
0 10
N/A
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 10
N/A
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 10
0 10
N/A
CHEMICAL Atcazine
1
2
3
4
5
6
15168 671
14451 536
13687 460
13165 430
L2489 354
249 71
0 044 17135
0.037 16500
0.034 14964
0.033 14386
0.028 13287
0 285 516
15L2
1269
1056
1033
870
196
0.088
0.077
0.071
0 072
0 065
0 380
28
27
23
19
16
6
2-2
19
17
14
12
6
0 766
0 704
0.739
0 737
0 750
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
3000 00
210 00
210.00
107 20
40 00
1500 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 08
140.00
44.38
44 38
36 10
23 70
55 20
CHEMICAL Azinphos-ethyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
61 0
6 0
5 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 112
0 000 6
0 000 6
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
I
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A,
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A,
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                    D-5

-------
PAGE  6
                                                                                                  11/21/38
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUWWiY ASSESSMENT  BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
CCT _ 	 _ 	
jC, I
NO / 90S.
RATIO
NO
SAMPLES
/ COS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Azinphos-methyl
I ?66 15
2 771 15
3 -71 15
4 89 0
5 39 0
6 55 0
CHEMICAL BHC
1 1428 16
2 1233 6
3 1233 6
4 442 6
5 442 6
6 55 10
0 015
0 019
0 019
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 011
0 005
0 005
0 014
0 014
0 182
957
851
785
226
160
106

2241
2134
2134
457
457
107
0
0
0
0
0
0

17
6
6
6
6
11
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 008
0 003
0 003
0 013
0 013
0 103
6
5
4
3
2
1

7
5
5
3
3
1
I
1
1
0
0
0

3
2
2
1
1
1
0 167
0 200
C 250
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 429
0 400
0 400
0 33J
0 333
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

4 25
4 25
4 25
4 25
4 25
0 02
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 CO
0 00
0 DO

2 70
2 70
2 70
2 70
2 70
0 00
CHEMICAL Bendiocacb
1 3 0
2 30
3 3 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Benefin
1 200 0
2 200 0
3 200 0
4 1 0
5 1 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Benomyl
1 361 2
2 561 2
3 561 2
4 28 0
5 28 0
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 004
0 004
Q 004
0 000
0 000
N/A
8
8
3
N/A
N/A
N/A

200
200
200
1
1
N/A

811
811
805
62
56
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

2
2
2
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 002
0 002
0 002
0 000
0 000
N/A
I
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A

2
2
2
1
1
N/A

4
4
3
2
1
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

•0
0
0
0
0
N/A

1
1
I
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
• o ooo
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 250
0 250
0 331
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

2 50
2 50
2 50
0 00
0 CO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

: :o
2 00
2 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
                                                    D-6

-------
PAGE  7
                                                                                                  LI/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUWARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
SET
VEILS
NO / PCS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO /
POS.
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
QEMICAL Bensulide
1
2
3
4
5
6
3 0 0 000
3 0 0 . 000
3 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
3
3
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Bentazon
1
2
3
4
5
6
26 0 0 000
26 0 0 000
26 0 0 000
24 0 0 000
24 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Bromacil
]_
2
3
4
5
6
935 46 0 049
85j 12 0 014
849 8 0.009
244 10 0 041
240 6 0 025
2 2 1 000
1149
1065
1059
236
230
4
49
14
9
9
4
3
0 043
0 013
0.008
0 038
0,017
0,750
4
4
4
3
3
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
0 750
0.750
o'soo
0 667
0 333
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
200 00
22.00
22.00
22.00
22 00
5.50
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 20
16 50
16 50
14 00
16 50
14 00
4 40
CHEMICAL Bromophos
1
2
3
4
•=>
6
55 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A. N/A
55 0 0.000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 OO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Broncphos-ethyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
S5 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                   D-7

-------
PAGE  8
                                                                                                  U/2L/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
WEILS
SET 	
NO / POS
CHEMICAL aufencarb
1 3 0
2 ° 0
i <5 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Suf/late
1 816 1
2 665 0
3 109 0
4 600 0
5 100 0
6 10 0
CHEMICAL Captafol
1 N/A N/A
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Captan
1 32S 0
2 300 0
3 300 0
4 S3 0
5 38 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Carbamate
1 61 0
2 61 0
J 61 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
SAMPLES
RATIO

0 QCO
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 001
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
screen
0 000
0 300
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
NO

8
g
8
N/A
N/A
N/A

1216
1199
168
1096
159
17

24
24
N/A
24
N/A
N/A

903
878
878
159
159
N/A

61
61
61
N/A
N/A
N/A
/ POS

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

14
14
0
0
0
0

0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 012
0 012
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
NO

1
1
1
N/A
N/A.
N/A

7
7
4
4
2
1

1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A

3
2
2
1
1
N/A

1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
STATE
/ POS

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

1
1
0
0
0
0

0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A

.0
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 143
0 143
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A

N/A.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

2 90
2 90
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MINIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

2 90
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 CO
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                   D-8

-------
PACE  9
                                                                                                  U/21/P8
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
WELLS
NO
CHEMICAL
1 3094
2 293?
3 2329
4 1987
5 1487
6 N/A
CHEMICAL •
1 212
2 212
3 212
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
/ PCS.
Carbaryi
3
I
0
0
0
N/A
RATIO NO

0 001 286CO
0 000 28600
0 000 2446
0 000 2504
0 000 1579
N/A N/A
SAMPLES
/ PCS

37
37
0
0
0
N/A
RATIO

0 001
0 001
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
NO

9
9
5
4
3
N/A
STATE
/ PCS

3
2
0
0
0
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVC
RATIO

0 333
0 222
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

4 00
4 OC
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

4 00
4 00
C CO
C 00
0 00
N/A
Catbendazim
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000 215
0 000 215
0 000 215
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Carbofuran
I 3294
2 3169
3 2537
4 2270
5 1770
6 N/A
48
47
36
29
29
N/A
0 015 30053
0 015 30028
0.014 28893
0.013 29027
0 016 28102
N/A N/A
7060
7060
7047
7039
7039
N/A
0 235
0 235
0 244
0.242
0.250
N/A
19
18
16
12
11
N/A
7
6
6
3
3
N/A
0 368
0 333
0 375
0 250
0 273
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
N/A
176 00
176 00
176 00
176 00
176 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
15 00
S 00
8 00
7 00
7 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Carbon tetrachioc ide
1 N/A
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A 'N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I 000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 08
0 08
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.50
0 50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 25
0 25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 25
0 25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Cacbophenothion
1 153
2 98
3 98
4 66
5 66
6 55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000 205
0 000 99
0 000 99
0 000 66
0 000 66
0 000 106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
3
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
C 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
3 00
0 00
                                                    D-9

-------
PAGE 10
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES [N  GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS RATIO
SAMPLES
NO
/ POS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Chloral lyl alcohol
I
2
3
4
5
6
11 0 0 000
11 0 0 000
11 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
45
45
45
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Chlocamben
1
2
3
4
5
6
611 1 0 002
595 0 0 000
95 0 0.000
595 0 0 000
95 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
1054
1054
100
1025
100
N/A
2
2
0
0
0
N/A
0 002
0 002
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
4
4
2
2
1
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
N/A
0 250
0 250
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
50 00
50 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
50 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Chlocdane
1
2
j
4
5
6
1769 J5 0 020
1408 12 0 009
1397 9 0 006
414 5 0 012
411 2 0 005
165 2 0 012
2057
1682
14S2
608
416
320
47
22
16
a
2
4
0 023
0 013
0 Oil
0 013
0 005
0 013
14
11
9
6
5
1
6
3
t
2
1
1
0 429
0 273
0 222
0 333
0 200
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
7 90
7 90
3 63
7 90
1 80
0 04
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
7 40
7 40
I 70
7 40
1 70
0 00
CHEMICAL Chlocdecone
1
2
3
4
5
6
57 0 0 000
2 0 0 000
2 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
108
2
2
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Chlordimeform
1
2
3
4
S
6
132 0 0 000
:s2 o o ooo
132 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
132
182
182
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                 D-10

-------
PACE 11
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS
RATIO
SAMPLES
NO /
CHEMICAL Chlorinated h/dcocacbon
1
-i
^
j
4
5
6
65 0
55 0
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 OCO
0 000
0 000
• N/A
N/A
N/A
68
68
68
N/A
N/A
N/A
PCS
screen
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
STATE
NO / PCS

1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 OQC
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
MINIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MINIMUM

•I/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL rhlorobenzilate
1
2
3
4
5
6
9 0
9 0
9 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
9
9
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
Q
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
I 0
I Q
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Chlocopicrin
1
2
3
4
5
6
829 0
229 0
829 0
34 0
34 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
371
871
871
65
65
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2 0
2 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Chlocothaloml
1
2
3
4
5
6
685 J
682 3
582 3
177 1
L77 I
N/A N/A
0 004
0 004
0 004
0 006
0 006
N/A
937
9J7
937
386
386
N/A
14
14
14
12
12
N/A
0.015
0 015
0 015
0 031
0 031
N/A
6 'J
5 3
5 3
J 2
3 2
N/A N/A
0 500
0 600
0 600
0 667
0 667
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
12 60
12 60
12 60
12 60
12 60
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 30
0 30
0 30
0 02
0 02
N/A
CHEMICAL Chlorpropham
1
2
3
4
5
6
260 0
260 0
260 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
262
262
262
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                  D-ll

-------
PAGE L2
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL

SET 	
NO
CHEMICAL C
1 2930
2 2688
3 2164
4 2135
5 1635
6 55
WELLS
/ POS. RATIO
'hlorpycifos
19 0 006
1 0 000
1 0 000
0 0 000
0 0 000
0 0 000
SAMPLES
NO

3505
3374
2338
2697
1760
106
/ POS

19
1
1
0
0
0
RATIO

0 005
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
NO

14
13
9
8
6
I
STATE
/ POE

2
I
I
0
0
0
RATIO

0 143
0 077
0 111
0 000
0 000
0 000
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
MAXIMUM

0 10
0 10
0 10
0 00
0 00
0 00
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
MAXIMUM

0 10
0 10
0 10
0 00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Crufomate
! 55
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 55
0 0 000
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0,000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Cryolite
1 N/A
2 ' N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
CHEMICAL C
1 3318
2 3068
3 2512
4 2732
5 2232
6 10
CHEMICAL C'
1 55
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 :5
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
/anazine
52 0 016
37 0 012
33 0 013
37 0 OH
33 0 015
1 0.100
, anophos
0 0 000
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 0 000
99
99
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

4202
4125
3015
J627
2690
17

106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
7
7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

161
150
66
70
66
1

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 071
0 071
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 OJ8
0 036
0 022
0 019
0 025
0.059

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
I
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

18
17
15
1J
11
1

I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

10
8
6
7
6
1

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
1.000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0.556
0 471
0.400
0 538
0 545
1 000

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 30
0 30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
1 79
1 ^9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

80 00
7 00
7 CO
7 00
7 00
1 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

7 00
7 00
7 00
7 00
7 00
1 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-12

-------
PACE U
                                                                                                 11/2L/S8
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
qc-r 	
OC. L
NO
CHEMICAL C
1 21
2 21
3 21
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
CHEMICAL C
1 23
2 28
3 23
4 23
5 28
6 N/A
WELLS
/ PCS
> cleats
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAMPLES
RATIO NO

0 000 21
0 000 21
0 000 21
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
/ PCS

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
NO /

2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
STATE
POS

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 OOC
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 CO
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 00
0 00
C 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
c no
"I/A
•J/A
N/A
MAXIMUM

3 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
/permethrin
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000 56
0 000 56
0 000 56
0 000 56
0 000 56
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 CO
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Cyprazine
1 30
2 30
3 30
4 30
5 30
6 N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000 36
0 000 36
0 000 36
0 000 36
0 000 36
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
o.ooo
0 000
0 000
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL DBCP
1 5631
2 56L8
i 5442
4 155
5 74
6 N/A
2147 '
2145
2120
14
L
N/A
0 331 8528
0.382 8515
0.390 8515
0.090 106
0.014 106
N/A N/A
4217
4215
4215
2
2
N/A
0 494
0 495
0 495
0 019
0 OL9
N/A
7
6
4
3
2
N/A
6
5
}
2
1
N/A
0 357
0 833
0 750
0 667
0 500
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
114 00
14 00
13 00
1 00
0 02
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
9 00
9 00
9 00
0 01
0 01
N/A
CHEMICAL DDT
1 3116
2 2756
3 2740
4 767
5 767
6 165
78
36
36
35
35
24
0 025 3394
0 013 3019
0 013 2783
0 046 997
0 046 777
0 145 320
81
35
35
35
35
28
0 024
0 012
0 013
0 035
0 045
0 087
15
13
11
7
6
1
7
5
5
3
3
1
0 467
0 385
0 455
0 429
0 500
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
402 00
402 00
402 00
402 00
402 00
0 76
C 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
108 00
108 00
108 00
103 00
108 00
0 02
                                                  D-13

-------
PAGE U
                                                                                                 U/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS
RATIO MO
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ PCS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL DBF
I
2
j
4
5
&
316 0
261 0
261 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 368
0 000 262
0 000 262
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 OC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL 3NOC
I
2
)
4
5
6
268 0
268 0
268 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 . 000 263
0 000 268
0 000 268
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/H
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
I
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Cacthal
1
2
3
4
5
6
6C6 12
4S< 9
493 9
113 0
118 0
110 0
0 020 1024
0 0)8 312
0 018 302
0 000 319
0 000 319
0 000 212
67
67
66
56
56
0
0 065
0 083
0 082
0 176
0 176
0 000
9
8
7
4
4
1
4
4
3
1
1
0
0 444
0 500
0 429
0 250
0 250
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1039 00
1039 00
1039 00
1039 00
1039 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
254 60
109 00
109 00
109 00
109 00
0 00
CHEMICAi Dalapon
1
2
3
-!
5
6
14 0
14 0
.4 0
N/A N/A
N. A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 14
0 000 14
0 000 M
N/A N/A
N/H N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/&
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/&
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Deacon
1
2
3
4
5
6
956 0
9.1: o
931 0
N/ A N/A
N- A N/A
55 0
0 000 1070
0 000 964
0 000 961
N/A )
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
3
2
1
1
N/A
1
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-14

-------
PAGE 15
                                                                                                 11/21/38
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS RATIO
SAMPLES
NO
/ POS
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Diallate
1
2
1
4
5
6
400 0 0 000
400 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
400 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
525
525
N/A
525
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Diazinon
1
2
3
4
5
f>
919 13 0 014
639 7 0 Oil
639 7 0 Oil
333 7 0 021
333 7 0 021
110 0 0 000
1059
822
788
464
435
212
13
7
7
7
7
0
0 012
0 009
0 009
0 015
0 016
0 000
11
9
7
6
5
1
2
1
1
1
I
0
0 182
0 111
0 143
0 167
0 200
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
478 00
478 00
478 00
478.00
478 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
o oo
0 00
162 00
L62 00
162 00
162 00
162 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Dicamba
i
2
3
4
5
6
961 34 0 035
386 13 0 015
287 8 0 028
768 7 0 009
193 2 0 010
55 17 0 309
1621
1479
428
1246
241
107
41
20
9
U
2
21
0 025
0.014
0 021
0 010
0 008
0 196
15
U
9
7
5
1
9
6
4
4
2
1
0 600
0 462
0 444
0 571
0 400
1 000
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
12 00
3 00
3 00
1 10
1.10
0,49
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 02
1 10
1 10
L 10
1 10
1 10
0 02
CHEMICAL Dicapthon
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0.000
109
3
N/A
3
N/A
106
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.000
N/A
0 000
2
1
N/A
1
N/A
1
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
0.000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0,00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 CO
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Dichlofenthion
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 OQ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-15

-------
PAGE 15
                                                                                                  11/21/53
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                          SI/WARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
SET
NO / PCS
RATIO
NO
SAMPLES
/ PCS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Dichlorpcop
1 i02 0
2 102 0
3 102 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
102
102
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 OC
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
o :c
o :o
o c?
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
o ;o
• o oo
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Dichlorvos
1 67 0
2 12 0
3 12 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 55 0
CHEMICAL DlCOfol
1 733 0
2 ?3J 0
3 733 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
125
L9
12
6
N/A
106

768
768
740
28
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
0

0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
4
3
1
1
N/A
1

2
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
0

0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00

0 00
0 On
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00

0 00
0 CO
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Dicrotophos
1 9 0
2 90
3 9 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Dieldrin
1 1549 56
2 1J19 19
3 1263 17
4 296 4
5 294 2
6 55 JJ
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 036
0 014
0 013
0 014
0 007
0 600
9
9
9
N/A
N/A
N/A

1756
1584
1356
490
316
107
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

83
32
28
6
2
51
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 047
0 020
0.021
0 012
0 006
0 477
I
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A

12
11
9
5
4
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

7
5
4
3
2
1
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 583
0 455
0 444
0 600
0 500
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 26
0 26
0 10
0 26
0 02
0 09
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
N/A
N/A
N, A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 2\
0 24
0 10
0 24
0 02
0 01
                                                   D-16

-------
PACE 17
                                                                                                 11/21/83
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                          SUMMAHY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS
RATIO NO
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Difolatar,
1
2
1
4
5
5
S3 0
S3 0
83 0
88 3
88 0
N/ A N/A
0 000 159
3 000 159
3 000 L59
0 000 159
0 000 159
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
1
1
L
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 30
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
C CO
0 00
0 OC
0 CC
0 OC
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Oimethoate
I
2
3
4
5
6
10SO I
10!3 1
613 1
401 0
1 0
55 0
CHEMICAL Dimethyl
T_
2
3
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 001 1263
0 001 1162
3 002 627
0 000 526
0 000 1
0 000 106
phthalate
0 000 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
1
I
1
0
0
0

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 001
0 001
0 002
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
S
4
2
2
1
1

1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
L
1
1
1
0
0
0

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 200
0 250
0 500
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 CO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 CO
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Dinoseb
1
2
3
4
5
6
1041 28
938 26
93S 26
335 17
335 17
N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Oioctyl
[
2
3
4
5
6
53 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 027 1265
0 028 1265
0 028 1140
0 051 531
0.051 531
N/A N/A
phthalate
0 000 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
36
36
33
24
24
N/A

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 028
0 028
0 029
0 045
0 045
N/A

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
7
7
7
5
5
N/A

1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
4"
4
4
3
3
N/A

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 571
0 571
0 571
0 600
0 600
N/A

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
74 00
74 00
74 00
36 70
36 70
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 CO
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
46 20
46 20
46 20
0 67
0 67
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-17

-------
PACE 18
                                                                                                11/21/88
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT  BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PC'S RATIO
SAMPLES
NO
/ PCS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ PCS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Oioxacarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
3 0 0 000
8 0 0 000
8 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
8
8
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Dioxathion
1
2
3
4
5
6
72 0 0 000
17 0 0 000
17 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
123
17
17
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Diphenamid
1
2
3
4
5
6
432 0 0 000
432 0 0 QOO
432 0 0 000
12 0 0 000
12 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
421
421
421
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Diphenyl phthalate
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL. Disulfoton
1
2
3
4
5
6
1264 14 0 Oil
1127 14 0 012
627 14 0 022
589 0 0 000
39 0 0 000
55 0 0 000
1339
1733
705
1088
160
106
14
14
14
0
0
0
0.008
0.008
0 020
0.000
0.000
0 000
8
7
5
4
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0 125
0 143
0 200
0 000
C 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
100 00
100 00
100.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
36 JO
36 30
36 30
0 00
0 00
0 00
                                                 L>18

-------
PAGE 19
                                                                                                 U/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT Bi  CHEMICAL
WELLS
NO
CHEMICAL
1 4
2 4
) 4
4 4
5 4
6 N/A
CHEMICAL
1 332
2 832
3 832
4 116
5 116
6 N/A
CHEMICAL
1 9169
2 9078
3 8994
4 377
5 377
6 24
CHEMICAL
1 N/A
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
CHEMICAL
I 65
2 10
3 10
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 55
/ POS
RATIO NO
SAMPLES
/ POS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POG
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PP8
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
Dith lOcaroaFiates
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
Diuron
12
12
12
0
0
N/A
EOT
925
916
912
57
57
5
EDC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
EPN
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000 4
0 000 4
0 000 4
0 000 4
0 000 4
N/A N/A

0 014 1180
0 014 1130
0 014 1180
0 000 171
0 000 171
N/A N/A

0 101 6845
0 101 6764
0 101 6764
0 151 5445
0 151 5445
0 208 38

N/A N/A
N/A ' N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A

0 TOO 116
0 000 10
0 000 10
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

27
27
27
0
0
N/A

151
139
139
99
99
11

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 023
0 023
0 023
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 022
0 021
0 0?1
0 018
0 018
0 289

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
1
1
1
1
N/A

4
4
4
3
3
N/A

12
10
9
6
6
1

1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A

2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

2
2
2
0
0
N/A

10
0
7
5
5
1

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 OOC
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 500
0 500
0 500
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 333
0.800
0 778
0 833
0 333
1 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
Q 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
N/A

1 54
1 54
1 54
0 00
0 00
N/A

JOO 00
300 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
5 70

0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 90
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 32

0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 61
0.61
0.61
0 00
0 00
N/A

6 50
6 50
6 50
2 80
2 80
0 82

0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-19

-------
PAGE 20
                                                                                                  .L/2I/33
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO NO
/ POS
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDV AVG.
HINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL EPTC
1
2
3
4
5
6
1128 1
845 1
289 0
520 1
20 0
77 0
0 001 1449
0 001 1365
0 000 284
0 002 939
0 000 14
0 000 84
10
10
0
1
0
0
0 007
0 007
0 000
0 001
0 000
0 000
7
6
4
3
2
2
2
2
0
1
0
0
0 286
0 333
0 000
0 333
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 33
0 33
0 00
0 33
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 33
0 33
0 00
0 33
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL ETU
I
2
3
4
5
6
58 3
34 0
34 0
34 0
34 0
N/A N/A
0 052 HO
0 000 86
0.000 37
0 000 86
0,000 37
N/A N/A
3
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 027
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
3
«
<&
1
2
1
N/A
1
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 333
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
4.60
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
3 90
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Endosulfan
1
2
3
•1
5
6
3340 37
2833 35
2771 31
455 2
455 2
57 2
0 Oil 4720
0 012 4580
0 Oil 4403
0 004 646
0 004 531
0 035 110
9
6
2
2
2
3
0.002
0 001
0.000
0 003
0 004
0 027
a
10
8
5
4
2
5
3
-
1
1
1
0 455
0 300
0 250
0 200
0 250
0 500
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 40
0.40
0 40
0 40
0 40
0 06
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 31
0 31
0 31
0 31
0 31
0 04
CHEMICAL Endothall
1
2
3
4
5
6
293 0
298 0
298 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 300
0 000 300
0 000 300
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
L
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL . Endrin
1
2
J
4
5
6
2994 16
2629 16
2578 16
367 0
367 0
55 0
0 005 3401
0 006 3265
0 006 3040
0 000 617
0 000 443
0 000 106
6L
61
61
0
0
0
0 OL8
0 019
0 020
0 000
0 000
0 000
13
12
11
6
5
1
I
1
1
0
0
0
0 077
0 083
0 091
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 67
0 67
0 67
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 02
0 02
0 02
0 00
0 00
0 00
                                                   D-20

-------
PAGE
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND NATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO NO, /
POS.
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
WSXIMtM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Eptam
1
2
3
4
5
6
83 0
88 0
38 0
38 0
38 0
N/A N/A
0 000 175
0 000 175
0 000 159
0 000 175
0 000 159
N/A N/A
0
0
0
Q
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2
2
1
2
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
C 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Ethion
I
2
3
4
5
6
381 0
326 0
326 0
100 0
100 0
55 0
0 000 46?
0 000 361
0 000 361
0 000 131
0 000 131
0 000 106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0,000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
4
3
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
o oo
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Ethoprop
~:
2
3
4
Q
6
170 0
115 0
115 0
115 0
115 0
55 0
0 000 312
0,000 206
0 000 206
0 COO 206
0 000 206
0 000 106
23
23
23
23
23
0
0 074
0.112
0 112
0 112
0 112
0 000
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0,250
0 333
0 333
0 333
0 333
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
12.60
12.60
12 60
12 60
12.60
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Ethyl paratluon
1
2
j
4
5
6
129 0
19 0
19 0
19 0
19 0
110 0
0 000 255
0 OOO 43
0.000 19
0.000 43
0.000 19
0.000 212
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.ooo
0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
3
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Ethylan
1
2
j
4
5
6
172 0
172 0
172 0
66 0
66 0
N/A N/A
0 000 172
0 000 172
0 000 172
0 000 66
0 000 66
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
3
3
3
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
S/A
                                                   D-21

-------
PAGE 22
                                                                                                a/21/33
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMAfW ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
RATIO
SAMPLES
NO. / PCS,
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Famphur
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
106 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
106 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0,00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Fenabutatm-oxide
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Fenamiphos
i
2
3
4
5
6
353 0
353 0
353 0
72 0
72 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
391 0
391 0
391 0
103 0
103 0
N/A N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2
2
2
1
I
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL. Fenitcothion
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
106 Q
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
106 0
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Fensulfothion
L
2
3
4
5
6
56 0
1 0
L 0
1 0
1 0
55 0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
107 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
106 0
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 .30
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
                                                  1^22

-------
PAGE 23
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT 3 If CHEMICAL
WELLS
CCT 	 — 	 	
ODi
NO / POS.
CHEMICAL Fenthion
1 55 0
2 N/A N/A
3 N/A N/A
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 55 0
RATIO

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
SAMPLES
NO. /

106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
POS.

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
RATIO

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
MO /

1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
STATE
POS

0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
CONCEHTRATICN RAN3ES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
MINIMUM

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
MAXIMUM

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
MINIMUM

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
MAXIMUM

0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Fenvalerate
1 92 0
2 92 0
3 92 0
4 91 0
5 91 0
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
120
120
120
119
119
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
3
3
3
2
2
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL. FJ.uchlotaJ.in
1 i65 0
2 165 0
3 155 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
165
165
165
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAI. Fiuometuron
1 97 0
2 97 0
3 97 0
4 97 0
5 97 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL. Fonofos
1 2064 5
2 2004 5
3 1480 5
4 1974 5
5 1474 5
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/fc

0 002
0 002
0 003
0 003
0 003
N/A
171
171
171
171
171
N/A

2625
2600
1651
2570
1645
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

5
5
5
5
5
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 002
0 002
0 003
0 002
0 003
N/A
2
2
2
2
2
N/A

9
7
5
4
3
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

2
2
2
2
2
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 222
0 286
0 400
0 500
0 667
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 11
0 11
0.11
0 11
0 11
N/A
                                                  D-23

-------
PAGE 24
                                       PESTICIDES [N GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
NO. / PCS.
RATIO
NO.
SAMPLES
/ POS.
RATIO
NO.
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL- Formaldehyde
1 4 0
2 40
3 4 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
4
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
I
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Glyphosate
1 101 6
2 101 6
3 101 6
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
0 059
0.059
0 059
N/A
N/A
N/A
36
36
36
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.500
0.500
0.500
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL: Heptachlor
1 2527 23
2 21J7 6
3 2082 5
4 279 1
5 278 0
6 55 1
0.009
0 OOJ
0 002
0 004
0.000
0 018
2634
2472
2196
505
283
107
27
10
8
2
0
1
0.010
0.004
0 004
0 004
0 000
0 009
12
10
8
5
4
1
5
3
2
1
0
1
0.417
0 300
0.250
0.200
0 000
1.000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 81
0.12
0 12
0 03
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.19
0.05
0 05
0 03
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL. Hexachlocobenzene
1 939 7
2 884 4
3 884 4
4 143 4
5 143 4
6 55 3
0.007
0.005
0.005
0.026
0.028
0.055
1012
905
905
143
143
107
7
4
4
4
4
3
0.007
0.004
0 004
0.028
0.028
0 028
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0 667
0 500
0 500
1 000
1 000
1 000
0.00
3 90
3 90
3.90
3.90
0 00
5 60
5 60
5 60
5.60
5.60
0 01
0.00
4 70
4.70
4 70
4.70
0 00
4 70
4.70
4 70
4,70
4.70
0 00
CHEMICAL: Hexazinone
1 98 2
2 98 2
3 98 2
4 88 2
5 88 2
6 N/A N/A
0 020
0 020
0 020
0.023
0 023
N/A
169
169
169
159
159
N/A.
2
2
2
2
2
N/A
0.012
0.012
0 012
0 OU
0 013
N/A
4
4
3
1
1
N/A
•J
t.
2
1
1
1
N/A
0 500
0.500
0 333
1 000
1 000
N/A
0.00
0 00 ,
0 00
7 00
7 00
N/A
9.00
9.00
9 00
9 00
9 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
8 00
8.00
N/A
8.00
8.00
8 00
8 00
8 00
N/A
                                                    D-24

-------
PAGE 25
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
cp-r 	
DC 1
NO / PCS
CHEMICAL Isocil
1 1 0
2 1 0
j 1 0
4 1 0
5 1 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Isofenphos
1 210 1
I 17 1
j 17 1
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Lindane
1 2362 30
2 2112 25
5 205J 25
4 523 21
5 523 21
6 55 2
CHEMICAL Linuron
1 805 3
2 737 3
3 2J7 3
4 673 0
5 173 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL HCPA
1 584 5
2 584 5
3 84 3
4 501 2
5 1 0
6 N/A N/A
SAMPLES
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 005
0.059
0 059
N/A
N/A
N/A

0 013
0 012
0 012
0 040
0 040
0 036

0 004
0.004
0.013
0.000
0.000
N/A

0 009
0 009
0 036
0 004
0 000
N/A
NO /

1
1
1
1
1
N/A

63
63
59
4
N/A
N/A

2743
2586
2396
599
599
107

1638
1638
603
1283
330
N/A

1047
1047
122
926
1
N/A
PCS.

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

1
1
1
0
N/A
N/A

23
23
22
21
21
2

3
3
3
0
0
N/A

7
7
3
4
0
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 016
0 016
0 017
0.000
N/A
N/A

0 010
0.009
0 009
0 035
0 035
0 019

0 002
0 002
0.005
0 000
0.000
N/A

0.007
0 007
0 025
0 004
0 000
N/A
ND /

1
1
1
1
1
N/A

3
2
1
1
N/A
N/A

16
14
12
6
6
1

6
6
4
5
3
N/A

4
4
3
2
1
N/A
STATE
PCS

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

1
1
1
0
N/A
N/A

a
6
5
)
3
1

2
2
2
1
1
N/A

2
2
1
1
0
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 333
0 500
1 000
0.000
N/A
N/A

0 500
0 429
0 417
0 500
0 500
1 000

0 333
0 333
0 500
0.200
0.33J
N/A

0 500
0 500
0 333
0 500
0 000
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A

0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00-
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

1 17
1.17
1.17
0.00
N/A
N/A

47 00
47 00
47 00
47 00
47 00
0 08

3 00
3 00
3.00
2.70
2.70
N/A

5 50
5.50
5 50
2 20
0.00
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0.00
1 17
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

1 17
1.17
1 17
0.00
N/A
N/A

11 LO
a 10
11 10
11 10
11 10
0 00

3 00
3 00
3 00
1 90
1 90
N/A

2 88
2.88
2 38
0.26
0 00
N/A
                                                    D-25

-------
PAGE 26
                                                                                                  •.1/21,88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND  WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO NO.
/ POS.
RATIO
NO.
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL MCPB
1
2
3
4
5
6
10 0
10 0
10 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 10
0 000 LO
0 000 10
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
i
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Malathion
1
2
3
4
5
6
755 3
505 2
505 2
JJ6 2
336 2
110 1
0 004 839
0 004 626
0 004 6U
0 006 453
0 006 438
0 009 213
3
2
2
2
2
1
0.004
0.003
0 003
0 004
0 005
0 005
8
7
6
6
5
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0.250
0.143
0 167
0 167
0.200
I 000
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
53.00
53.00
53.00
53 00
53.00
5 20
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
41.50
41.50
41.50
41 50
41.50
0 03
CHEMICAL Mancozeb
l'
2
3
4
5
6
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A 34
N/A 34
N/A N/A
N/A 34
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
1
L
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Maneb
I
2
3
4
5
6
268 0
268 0
268 0
N/Pi N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 351
0.000 323
0.000 274
N/A 49
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
2
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Mecoprop
1
2
3
4
5
6
17 0
17 0
17 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 60
0 000 60
0 000 60
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                   D-26

-------
PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
   SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO. /
POS.
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS.
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Mecphos
1
->
j
4
5
6
193 0 0 000
US 0 0 000
138 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
244
138
138
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
-)
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Metalaxyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
38 1 0 026
38 1 0 026
38 L 0 026
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
25fi
25fi
247
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
4
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 016
0 016
0 004
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 000
1.000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 27
0.27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.30
2.30
2.30
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 00
1 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.00
1 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Metam sodium
i
2
3
4
5
f>
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
31
31
N/A
31
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Methamidophos
1
2
3
4
5
6
499 9 0 018
499 9 0.018
499 9 0.018
126 9 0.071
126 9 0.071
N/A N/A N/A
602
602
585
221
204
N/A
10
10
10
10
10
N/A
0.017
0.017
0.017
0 045
0 049
N/A
3
3
2
2
1
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0 JJJ
0 3J3
0.500
0 500
1 000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
10.50
10.50
10.50
10 50
10.50
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
4.80
4.80
4.80
4.80
4 80
N/A
CHEMICAL Methidathion
1
2
3
4
5
6
105 0 0 000
50 0 0 000
50 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
157
51
51
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
            D-27

-------
PAGE 28
                                                                                                ii/a, 33
                                      PESTICIDES [N GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT By CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS
RATIO ' NO.
SAMPLES
/ POS.
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Methiocarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
L4 0
14 0
14 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 14
0 000 14
0 000 14
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/ft
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Methomyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
324 3
814 3
814 3
92 0
92 0
N/A N/A
0 004 25923
0.004 25923
0 004 25910
0 000 25132
0 000 25U2
N/A N/A
84
84
84
80
80
N/A
0 003
0 003
0 003
0 003
0 003
N/A
8
8
7
6
6
N/A
2
2
2
1
I
N/A
0 250
0 250
0.286
0.167
0 167
N/A
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
20 00
20.00
20.00
9 00
9 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
8 00
8 00
3.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Methoxychlor
1
2
3
4
5
6
1471 0
1276 0
1217 0
272 0
272 0
55 0
CHEMICAL Methyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
2896 0
2896 0
2896 0
34 0
34 0
N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Methyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
34 0
34 0
34 0
34 0
34 0
N/A N/A
0 000 1555
0 000 1449
0 000 1290
0 000 443
0 000 343
0 000 106
bromide
0 000 4527
0.000 4527
0 000 4527
0.000 65
0.000 65
N/A N/A
isothiocyanate
0 000 65
0 000 65
0 000 65
0 000 65
0 000 65
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
12
11
9
5
4
1

2
2
2
1
L
N/A

1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00

0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
                                                  D-28

-------
PAGE 29
                                                                                                 11/21/38
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMKA8Y  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
VCLLS
NO. / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO NO / POS
RATIO
STATE
NO. / POS
CONCENTRATION
ABSOLUTE
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
RANGES IN PPB
STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Methyl paratMon
L
2
j
4
5
6
2519 20
2409 19
1909 19
2163 6
1663 6
110 1
0 008 3088
0 008 2875
0 010 1923
0 003 2691
0.004 1739
0 009 213
7
6
6
6
6
1
0 002
0 002
0 003
0 002
0 003
0.005
11
10
8
7
5
1
3
2
2
1
1
1
0 273
0.200
0.250
0 143
0.200
1 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
256 00
256 00
256 00
256 00
256.00
0 01
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
88 40
38 40
88 40
88 40
88 40
0 00
CHEMICAL Methyl trithion
1
2
3
4
5
6
66 0
66 0
66 0
66 0
66 0
N/A N/A
CHEMICAL. Methylene
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 66
0 000 66
0 000 66
0 000 66
0 000 66
N/A N/A
chloride
0 000 1
0.000 1
0 000 I
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A

2
2
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A

1
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 500
0.500
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

3 90
3 90
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A

19 00
19 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A

7 45
7 45
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/S

11 50
11 50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Metoiachlor
1
2
3
4
5
6
3774 60
3319 39
2717 30
3120 39
2574 30
162 12
0 016 4655
0 012 4330
Q.011 3085
0.013 3929
0.012 2866
0.074 235
151
124
77
90
77
18
0 032
0.029
0 025
0 023
0.027
0.077
17
16
14
13
11
5
11
7
5
7
5
5
0.647
0 437
0.357
0 538
0 455
1 000
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
1300.00
88.00
32.32
48.00
32.32
112 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 92
200.00
17 66
6.00
17 66
6.00
20 90
CHEMICAL. Metribuzin
1
2
3
4
S
6
2995 36
2910 61
2409 54
2850 41
2349 34
2 2
0 029 3814
0 021 3786
0 022 2756
0 014 3571
0 014 2645
1 . 000 3
122
100
91
75
67
3
0 032
0 026
0 033
0 021
0 025
1 000
13
13
12
11
10
1
6
6
5
6
5
1
0 462
0 462
0 417
0 545
0 500
I 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
6 80
6.80
6 80
6 80
6.80
2 10
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 OC
0 OC
0 17
2 10
2 00
2 00
1 83
1 83
2 10
                                                   D-29

-------
PAGE 30
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO NO
/ POS.
RATIO
NO.
STATE
/ POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Mevinphos
1
2
3
4
5
6
222 0
167 0
167 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 277
0 000 171
0 000 171
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 CO
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL. Mi rex
1
2
J
4
5
6
328 0
181 0
181 0
66 0
66 0
55 0
0 000 291
0 000 185
0 000 181
0 . 000 70
0.000 66
0.000 106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
5
4
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0.00
0 00
0 CO
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
CHEMICAL. Molinate
1
2
J
4
5
6
479 4
479 4
479 4
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 008 661
0 008 661
0 008 661
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
19
19
19
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 029
0 029
0.029
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.000
1 000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Monocrotophos
1
2
3
4
5
6
64 0
9 0
9 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 115
0.000 9
0.000 9
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000 106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL. Haled
1
2
3
4
5
6
86 0
31 0
31 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 169
0 000 63
0 000 31
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
6
6
0
N/A
N/A
0
0.036
0 095
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
4
^
1
N/A
N/A
1
2
• 1
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 500
0 500
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
3.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
7 00
7 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 81
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
                                                  D-30

-------
P?GE 31
                                                                                                  1/21/38
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMffiRY ASSESSED BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO. /
POS.
RATIO
NO. /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RAMSES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Napcopamide
1
2
3
4
5
6
172 0 0 OOQ
172 0 0 000
172 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
180
180
180
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Nitto£en
1
2
3
4
5
6
11 0 0 000
11 0 0 000
11 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
11
11
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL OrganochlOEines
1
2
3
4
5
6
36 0 0 000
36 0 0 000
36 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Organophosphate
1
2
3
4
5
6
67 0 0 000
67 0 0 000
67 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A NA
N/A N/A NA
73
73
58
15
N/A
N/A
screen
84
84
69
15
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
o.ooo
0 000
N/A
N/A
2
2
1
1
N/A
N/A

2
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A

0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A

0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A

0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A

0.00
0 00
N/A
0.00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A

0 00
0 OO
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Oryzalin
i
2
3
4
5
6
174 0 0 000
174 0 0 000
174 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
182
182
132
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 QOO
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                  D-31

-------
PAGE 32
                                      PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                         SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS
RATIO NO.
SAMPLES
/ POS.
RATIO
NO.
STATE
/ POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Ovex
1
2
3
4
5
6
2 0
2 0
2 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 2
0 000 2
0 000 2
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Oxamyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
688 6
688 6
588 5
226 5
226 5
N/A N/A
0 009 25742
0 009 25742
0 009 25642
0.022 25278
0 022 25278
N/A N/A
907
907
906
906
906
N/A
0 035
0 035
0.0 35
0 036
0 036
N/A
5
5
5
4
4
N/A
3
3
3
3
3
N/A
0 600
0.600
0.600
0.750
0.750
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
395.00
395.00
J95.00
395.00
395 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
7 20
7.20
7.20
7 20
7 20
N/A
CHEMICAL. Oxydemeton-methyl
1
2
3
4
5
6
57 0
2 0
2 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 108
0 000 2
0 000 2
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
:
i
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
CHEMICAL. PCB
1
2
3
4
5
6
66 0
66 0
66 0
66 0
66 0
N/A N/A
0 000 66
0.000 66
0.000 66
0.000 66
0.000 66
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0 000
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL PCN
1
2
3
4
5
6
162 0
162 0
162 0
66 0
66 0
N/A N/A
0 000 162
0 000 162
0 000 162
0 000 66
0 000 66
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
                                                 I>32

-------
PAGE 33
                                                                                                 Li/21/38
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
SEi ~~ — — - —
NO / COS.
CHEMICAL PCNB
I 712 19
2 653 0
3 253 0
4 488 0
5 88 0
6 55 19
CHEMICAL PCP
1 1090 144
2 1035 104
j 792 0
4 243 104
5 N/A N/A
6 55 40
CHEMICAL Paraquat
1 685 0
2 635 0
j 685 0
4 30 0
5 30 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL. Pacathion
1 1572 2
2 1569 2
3 1569 2
4 1486 2
5 1486 2
6 N/A N/A
SAMPLES
RATIO

0 027
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.345

0 132
0.100
0 000
0.428
N/A
0 727

0.000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 001
0.001
0.001
0,001
0.001
N/A
NO. /

962
855
326
684
159
107

1601
1494
951
543
N/A
107

647
647
633
36
36
N/A

1623
1623
1620
1520
1517
N/A
POS.

33
0
0
0
0
33

169
104
0
104
N/A
65

1
1
0
0
0
N/A

2
2
2
2
2
N/A
RATIO

0 034
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0.308

0 106
0 070
0 000
0.192
N/A
0 607

0.002
0 002
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A

0.001
0.001
0 001
0.001
0.001
N/A
NO, /

5
4
2
2
1
1

6
5
3
2
N/A
1

5
S
4
' 1
1
N/A

7
6
5
5
4
N/A
STATE
POS.

1
0
0
0
0
1

4
3
1
2
N/A
1

1
1
0
0
0
N/A

I
I
1
1
1
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 200
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
1 000

0 667
0 600
0.333
1 000
N/A
1 000

0.2QO
0 200
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A

0 143
0 167
0 200
0 200
0 250
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00

0 00
0.00
0.00
0.42
N/A
0 00

O.QO
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 22
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 22

149.00
149 00
0 00
149 00
N/A
0.05

3.00
3 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A

0.04
0.04
0.04
0 04
0 04
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
C 02

0 00
0.00
0 00
0.58
N/A
0 01

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 02
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.02

18.30
18.30
0.00
18.30
N/A
0.01

3 00
3 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 03
0.03
0 03
0 03
0.03
N/A
CHEMICAL. Pendimethalin
1 97 0
2 97 0
3 97 0
4 95 0
5 95 0
6 N/A N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
102
102
102
100
100
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
                                                   D-33

-------
PAGE 34
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES [N GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WEILS
NO / PCS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO.
/ POS.
RATIO
NO.
STATE
/ POS
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Pecmethrin
1
2
3
4
5
6
184 0 0 000
184 0 0 000
134 0 0 000
28 0 0 000
28 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
390
390
361
85
56
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
3
3
2
2
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Phencapton
1
2
j
4
5
6
55 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
CHEMICAL Phenthoate
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Phorate
1
2
j
4
5
6
1155 0 0.000
1012 0 0.000
488 0 0.000
595 0 0.000
95 0 0.000
55 0 0.000
1662
1531
498
1025
100
106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
8
6
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Phosalone
I
2
3
4
5
6
48 0 0 000
48 0 0 000
4S 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
49
49
49
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
I
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A •
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                 LV34

-------
PAGE :
                                                                                                 i1/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                         SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS. RATIO
SAMPLES
ND. /
POS.
RATIO
NO. /
STATE
POS.
CONCENTRATIOI RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTS STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL, Phosmet

2
3
4
5
6
226 1 0 004
171 1 0 006
171 1 0 006
88 0 0 000
88 0 0 000
55 0 0 000
283
L77
177
159
159
106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
4
3
3
I
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0 250
0 333
0.333
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
CHEMICAL Phosphamidon
i
2
j
4
5
6
157 0 0 000
102 0 0 000
2 0 0 000
100 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
55 0 0 000
508
402
2
400
N/A
106
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.000
3
2
1
1
N/A
1
0
0
0
0
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
0 000
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
N/A
0.00
CHEMICAL Picloram
I
2
i
4
5
6
1285 43 0 033
1157 32 0.028
468 21 0 045
987 19 0 019
298 8 0 027
126 11 0 087
2150
2013
587
1770
357
137
72
57
30
34
8
15
0 033
0.028
0.051
0.019
0.022
0.109
10
10
8
7
6
1
8
a
5
5
3
1
0 800
0 800
0 625
0 714
0.500
1 000
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 02
49 00
49.00
49 00
49 00
49 00
3.56
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 40
16 60
16 60
16 60
16 60
16 60
0 40
CHH4ICAL: Profluraiin
I
2
3
4
5
6
11 0 0 000
a o o.ooo
11 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
11
11
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL PEoaecarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
8 0 0.000
8 0 0 000
8 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
8
8
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A '
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                 D-35

-------
PAGE 36
                                                                                                   11/21/88
                                        PESTICIDES IN  GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                           SUMMARY ASSESSMENT  BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO.
/ POS.
RATIO
HO.
STATE
/ POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL. Proroeton
1
2
3
4
5
6
316 10 0 032
291 10 0 034
291 10 0 034
171 2 0 012
171 2 0 012
N/A N/A N/A
346
321
321
182
182
N/A
20
20
20
4
4
N/A
0 058
0.062
0 062
0 022
0 022
N/A
5
4
4
3
3
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0 400
0.500
0 500
0 333
0.333
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
29 60
29 60
29 60
29 60
29 60
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
16 60
16.60
16 60
16 60
16 60
N/A
CHEMICAL' Pronetcyn
1
2
3
4
5
6
470 0 0 000
470 0 0 000
470 0 0 000
96 0 0 000
96 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
522
522
522
102
102
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
3
3
3
2
2
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/A
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
CHEMICAL. Propachlor
I
2
3
4
5
6
679 4 0 006
679 4 0 006
179 2 0 Oil
65L 2 0.003
151 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
1155
1155
230
1076
151
N/A
4
4
2
2
0
N/A
0.003
0 003
0.009
0 002
0.000
N/A
5
5
4
3
2
N/A
2
2
1
L
0
N/A
0.400
0.400
0.250
0,333
0.000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
2.98
2.98
2 98
0.50
0.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
1 60
1 60
1 60
0.35
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Propaml
1
2
3
4
5
6
85 0 0.000
85 0 0.000
85 0 0.000
85 0 0.000
35 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
171
171
171
171
171
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
1
L
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL. Propargite
1
2
3
4
5
6
220 0 0 000
220 0 0 000
220 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
221
221
221
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                   LV-36

-------
PACE 37
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
MO / PCS.
RATIO
SAMPLES
NO / COS.
HATIO
STATE
NO. / POS
CONCENTRATION
ABSOLUTE
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
RANGES IN
STUDY
MINIMUM
PPB
AVG
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Propazme
^
2
3
4
5
6
372 4
316 3
316 3
264 3
264 3
56 1
0 Oil
0 009
0 009
0 Oil
0.011
0.018
583 5
526 3
526 3
473 3
473 3
57 2
0 009
0 006
0 006
0 006
0 006
0,035
6
5
5
4
4
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
0 500
0 400
0 400
0 500
0 500
1.000
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
2 50
0 20
0.20
0 20
0 20
2.50
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 20
0 20
0 20
0 20
0 20
N/A
CHEMICAL Pcopham
1
2
3
4
5
6
232 0
232 0
232 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
H/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
233 0
233 Q
233 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Ptopoxur

2
3
4
5
6
14 0
14 0
14 0
H/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
14 0
14 0
14 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Pyrethrins
1
2
3
4
5
6
19 0
19 0
19 Q
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
N/fc
N/A
N/A
19 0
19 0
19 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0,00
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL: Ronnei
1
2
3
4
5
6
64 0
9 0
9 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
115 0
9 0
9 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
106 0
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                    D-37

-------
PAGE 38
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT  BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO. / PCS.
RATIO NO.
SAMPLES
/ PCS.
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ PCS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL. Schradan
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000 106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0,000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Siduron
1
2
3
4
5
6
17 0
17 0
17 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000 43
0 000 43
0 000 43
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0,000
0.000
0,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Silvex
1
2
3
4
5
6
1606 10
1551 1
1100 1
701 0
301 0
55 9
0 006 1963
0.001 1856
0 001 1184
0 000 998
0 000 377
0.164 107
12
1
1
0
0
a
0 006
0.001
0 001
0.000
0.000
0.103
11
10
8
6
4
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0. 182
0.100
0 125
0 000
0 000
1 000
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.62
0.02
0 02
0 00
0.00
0.62
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 01
0.02
0 02
0 02
0 00
0.00
0 01
CHEMICAL: Simazine
1
2
3
4
5
6
2732 137
2724 132
2181 121
1199 37
656 26
N/A N/A
0 050 3435
0.048 3429
0.055 2361
0.031 1634
0.040 566
fVA N/A
186
180
161
53
34
N/A
0.054
0.052
0.068
0.032
0.060
N/A
21
20
17
12
10
N/A
13
12
10
7
6
N/A
0 619
0 600
0.588
0 583
0 600
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
16.00
16.00
16.00
9.10
9 10
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
11 00
11.00
11.00
9 10
9 10
N/A
CHEMICAL. Simeton*
1
2
3
4
5
6
30 0
30 0
30 0
30 0
30 0
N/A N/A
0.000 36
0.000 36
0.000 36
0 000 36
0 000 36
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
                                                   D-38

-------
FACE 39
                                                                                                 11/21/
                                       PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY  ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
SAMPLES
NO / POS RATIO NO. / PCS.
RATIO
STATE
NO / PCS
CONCENTRATION
ABSOLUTE
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
RANGES IN
STUDY
MINIMUM
PPB
AVG
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Simetryn
1
2
3
4
5
6
148 0 0
148 0 0
148 0 0
96 0 0
96 0 0
N/A N/A
000 155
000 155
000 155
000 102
000 102
N/A N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
3
3
3
2
2
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Sodium chlorate
1
2
3
4
5
6
900
900
900
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
000 9
000 9
000 9
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Suifallate
1
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0 0
OQO 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
000 106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Sulfotep
I
2
3
4
5
6
55 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0 0
000 106
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
.000 106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL. Sulptofos
1
2
3
4
5
6
95 1 0
95 1 0
95 1 0
95 1 0
95 1 0
N/A N/A
.Oil 100
Oil 100
Oil 100
Oli 100
Oil 100
N/A N/A
20
20
20
20
20
N/A
0 200
0 200
0 200
0 200
0 200
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
1 000
1 000
L 000
1 000
1 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
1 40
1,40
I 40
1 40
I 40
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
1 35
1 35
1 35
1.35
I 35
N/A
                                                   D-39

-------
PAGE 40
                                       PESTICIDES IM GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL

SET 	
NO
WELLS
/ PCS.
SAMPLES
RATIO
NO. / POS.
RATIO
STATE
NO / POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL TCP
I 17
2 17
3 17
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 059
0 059
0 059
N/A
N/A
N/A
60
60
60
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 033
0 033
0 033
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 1
1 1
1 1
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 000
1 000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 10
0 10
0 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 76
0 76
0 76
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 43
0 43
0 43
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 43
0 43
0 43
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL IDE
1 1442
2 1247
j 1201
4 2J8
5 238
6 55
2
2
2
2
2
0
0 001
0 002
0 002
0 008
0 008
0 000
1437
1331
1242
286
243
106
2
2
2
2
2
0
0 001
0 002
0 002
0 007
0 008
0 000
7 1
6 1
5 1
3 1
2 1
1 0
0 143
0 167
0.200
0 333
0 500
0.000
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0.00
6 20
6 20
6.20
6.20
6 20
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0.00
4.80
4.80
4 80
4.80
4 80
0.00
CHEMICAL TEPP
1 55
2 N/A
3 N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 55
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL Tebuthiuron
1 3
2 3
3 3
4 1
5 1
6 N/A
2
2
2
0
0
N/A
0 667
0 667
0.667
0.000
0.000
N/A
17
17
17
1
1
N/A
13
13
13
0
0
N/A
0.765
0.765
0.765
0.000
0 000
N/A
2 1
2 1
2 I
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
0 500
0 500
0.500
0 000
0 000
N/A
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
380 00
380 00
380.00
0 00
0.00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
276 57
276 67
276 67
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Tecnazene
1 55
2 N/A
J N/A
4 N/A
5 N/A
6 55
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
I 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                   D-40

-------
PAGE 41
                                                                                                 11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                 ASSES3CNT BY CHEMICAL
WELLS
CET 	 — —
«3Dl 	
NO I POS.
CHEMICAL Terbaeil
1 15 0
2 15 0
3 15 0
4 12 0
5120
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL, Tecbu£os
1 1979 7
2 1867 0
3 U43 0
4 1831 0
5 1431 0
6 N/A N/A
CHEMICAL Tecbutryn
1 52 0
2 52 0
3 52 0
4 L 0
5 1 0
6 N/A N/A
SAMPLES
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 004
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 000
0 GOG
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
NO /

3
3
3
N/A
N/A
N/A

2143
2088
1461
1974
1449
N/A

60
60
60
1
1
N/A
POS.

0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

9
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A

0.004
0 000
0.000
0.000
0 000
N/A

0.000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
NO /

2
2
2
1
1
N/A

9
8
6
5
4
N/A

2
2
2
1
I
N/A
STATE
PCS,

0
0
0
0
0
N/A

1
0
0
0
0
N/A

0
0
0
0
0
N/A
CONCENTRATION RANKS IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO

0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 111
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A

0 OCX)
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

12.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A

0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MINIMUM

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
MAXIMUM

0 00
C 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

11.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A

0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Tetrachlorvinphos
1 57 0
2 20
3 2 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 55 0
0 000
0.000
Q.OOQ
N/A
N/A
0.000
108
2
2
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0,000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
L
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0,00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0,00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0,00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL. Tettadlfon
1 109 0
2 54 0
3 54 0
4 N/A N/A
5 N/A N/A
6 55 0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
160
54
54
N/A
N/A
106
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
1
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0,00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
                                                  D-41

-------
PAGE 42
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO, / POS.
SAMPLES
RATIO
NO. / POS.
RATIO
STATE
NO. / POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL- Thanite
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Thiobencarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
389 0
389 0
389 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
489
489
489
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A, N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Thiodicarb
1
2
3
4
5
6
8 0
8 0
8 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
59
59
59
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 0
2 0
2 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL' Thionazin
1
2
,!
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 00
CHEMICAL' Toluene
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 1
1 1
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 000
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 20
0.20
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 20
0 20
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 20
0 20
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                   D-42

-------
PAGE 43
                                                                                                 U/21/J
                                      PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO. /
POS.
RATIO
NO /
STATE
POS
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Toxaphene
1
2
j
4
5
6
2J47 2 0 001
2177 2 0 001
2118 2 0 001
519 2 0 004
519 2 0 004
N/A N/A N/A
2886
2856
2666
858
727
N/A
2
2
2
2
2
N/A
0 001
0 001
0 001
0 002
0 003
N/A
12
12
10
6
5
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0 08J
0 083
0 100
0 167
0 200
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
4910.00
4910 00
4910 00
4910 00
4910.00
N/A
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
0 00
N/A
3205 00
3205 00
3205 00
3205 00
3205 00
N/A
CHEMICAL Tnadimefon
1
2
j
4
5
6
9 0 0 000
9 0 0 . 000
9 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
16
16
16
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL, retaliate
1
2
J
4
5
6
51 8 0.157
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
51 8 0.157
98
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
98
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9
0.092
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 092
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 000
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 13
0 01
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 01
0 01
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 01
CHEMICAL. Triazine screen
1
2
3
4
5
6
2 0 0 000
2 0 O.OOO
2 0 0.000
I 0 0.000
I 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/H
1
1
1
H/*
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/X
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL- Trichlorfon
1
2
3
4
5
6
124 0 0 000
124 0 0 000
124 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
128
128
128
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                  D-43

-------
PAGE 44
                                                                                                  li/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER  DATA BASE
                                          SUMMARY ASSESSMENT BY  CHEMICAL
SET
WELLS
NO / POS. RATIO
SAMPLES
NO.
/ POS.
RATIO
NO
STATE
/ POS.
RATIO
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AUG.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Tnchloronate
1
2
j
4
5
6
1 0 0 000
1 0 0 000
1 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL. Triclopyr
1
2
j
4
5
6
88 0 0.000
88 0 0 000
88 0 0 000
88 0 0 000
88 0 0 000
N/A N/A N/A
159
159
159
159
159
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0 00
0 00
0.00
0 00
N/A
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
N/A
CHEMICAL. Tnfluralin
1
2
3
4
5
6
2561 24 0 009
2395 15 0 006
1861 13 0 007
2J09 6 0 003
1807 4 0 002
1 1 1.000
2986
2960
1995
2823
1890
1
32
23
19
9
5
1
0 Oil
0.008
0.010
0.003
0.003
1 000
14
13
10
9
7
1
6
5
5
4
4
1
0 429
0 385
0 500
0 444
0 571
1 000
0 00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0 00
0 00
5.40
5 40
2.20
5.40
2.20
0 03
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 03
4 05
4 05
1 28
4 05
1 28
0 03
CHEMICAL: Vernolate
I
2
3
4
5
6
2 0 0.000
2 0 0.000
2 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/*
N/A N/A fVA
N/A N/A N/A
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0.000
0.000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL: Zijwb
1
2
3
4
5
6
10 0 0 000
10 0 0.000
10 0 0.000
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
38
38
10
28
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
N/A
N/A
2
2
1
1
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
0 000
0.000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00 '
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
N/A
N/A
0 00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
0-00
0 00
N/A
0 00
N/A
N/A
                                                  D-44

-------
PAGE 45
                                                                                                  11/21/88
                                       PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                          SUWAfW ASSESSMENT BY CHJMICM,
SET
WELLS
NO / PCS
RATIO
•
SAMPLES
NO. /
POS.
RATIO
STATE
NO / POS.
CONCENTRATION RANGES IN PPB
ABSOLUTE STUDY AVG.
RATIO
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
CHEMICAL Ziram
5
2
J
4
5
6
2J6 0
236 0
2J6 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
238
238
238
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
0 000
0 000
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
CHEMICAL Zytron
1
2
j
4
5
6
55 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
55 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
106
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
106
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
1 0
0 000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0 000
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
0 00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.00
CHEMICAL' p-Nitrophenol
1
2
3
4
5
6
14J 3
143 3
143 3
L43 3
143 3
N/A N/A
0 021
0.021
0 021
0 021
0 021
N/A
143
143
143
143
143
N/A
3
3
3
3
3
N/A
0.021
0.021
0.021
0 021
0 021
N/A
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
N/A N/A
1 000
1 000
1 000
1.000
1 000
N/A
4.00
4 00
4 00
4.00
4 00
N/A
20,00
20.00
20 00
20.00
20.00
N/A
12.80
12 80
12 80
12 80
12 80
N/A
12.80
12 80
12 80
12 80
12 80
N/A
                                                   D-45

-------
 APFEMDIX E
BIBLIOGRAPHY

-------
 Page HO
 11/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES tN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
 Number
                          Full Reference
                                                                                        Consents
 ALOOi  French.  James H   Tennessee Valley Authority   Letter   Letter is adc:
        to Douglas Parsons,  USEPA,  dated October 17,  1988       Parsons
                3sed  to David Parsons  -  should  read Douglas
 AROOi   Law,  T L ,  J D  Mattice,  and T C  Cavalier,  "Anal/sis  Samples taken  from  j  SE  areas  c£  the State,  with  leavy
        of Groundwater for Trace Levels of Pesticides",  Pub     agricultural production    GLC  or  HPLC analytical  methods
        NO  118,  prepared by Altheimer Laboratory,  Dept   Of     used to detect pesticides    Detection Limit was between L
        Agronomy,  University o£ Arkansas, for the U S  Dept  of  5 ppb
        Interior,  Sept  1985                                    This information  was  confirmed by Terry L  lav,-,  Jrr.-.ers-.".
                                                                of Arkansas with  a  teiepnone call to Douglas W Parsons or
                                                                August 16,  1988

 AR002   Cavalier,  Tom C .  Lavy, Terry L  and Mattice, John D    This information  was  confirmed by Terry L  Lavy,  University
        "Monitoring  Groundwater in Arkansas for the Presence of  of Arkansas with  a  telephone call to Douglas W Parsons on
        Pesticides"   University of Arkansas,  Department  of      August 16,  1988  This information was taken from  the
        Agronomy
                                                                abstract of  the report
AZ001   Ellingson,  S  B   and  M 8  Redding,  "Random Survey of      Analytical  confirmation included in paper  Orign of
        VOC's, Pesticides  and Inorganics  in  Arizona's Drinking  contamination and interpretation not yet verified by
        Water Wells", prepared by the Arizona Department of      authors
        Environmental Quality and published  in the proceedings
        of   FOCUS Conference on Southwestern Ground Water
        Issues held on March 23-25,  1988,  Albuquerque,  New
        Mexico,  1988
CA001  Brown, H ,  C  Cardoza, S  Nicosia, J  Toiano, S  All,
       "Sampling for Pesticide Residues  in California Well
       water  1986 Well Inventory Data Base", First Annual
       Report to the Legislature, State  Department of Health
       Services, and State Water Resources Control Board
       pursuant to the Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act,
       prepared by the Hazards Assessment Program,
       Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch,
       California Department of Food and Agriculture, Dec   1,
       1986

CA901  California Water Quality Control  Board, "Control of
       Pesticide Discharges to North Coast Maters", North
       Coast Region, Nov  21, 1984

CA902  Oshima, R.J , G  Torres, S J  Nelson, and T M  Mischke,
       "Monitoring Selected Ground Water Basins  for the
       Presence of Aidicarb   A Cooperative  California
       Interagency Study", Califronia Dept   of Food and
       Agriculture, State Water Resource Control Board,  and
       Department of Health Services, April  1980

CA90J  Letter dated 3/19/85 to F  Sanders, U S   EPA/OPTr ;rom
Comprehensive compilation of monitoring studies in
California  Concentrations not indicated  Full data base
requested by HED
Funded  in part  through Areawide Waste  TreaUnent  Management
Continuing Planning Program   {torn U S   EPA,  Region  IX  under
Fed  Water Poll Control Act Section 208
                                                          E-l

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES  IN GROUND WATER DATA 3ASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
 Numbec
                          Full  Reference
                                                                                        Comments
        J  S   Lovell,  Union  Carbide  Agricultural  Products Co
        Inc

 CA904   Jones,  R  L    "Central  California  Studies on  the         Article reports on three studies, one of which included
        Degradation  and  Movement of Mdicarb  Residues"  Journal shallow ground water inoni toeing   This was an application
        of Contaminant Hydrology, Volume  1  287-298    1987       of  4  46 kg/ha to grapes   There were 27 wells in 9
                                                               clusters, with 4 clusters installed 11 months after
                                                               application

 CA905   Jones,  R  L    "Progress Report   Measurement of Aldicarb  Experimental site planted, with grapes   Aldlcarb was
        Degradation  and  Movement for Winter Application to      applied 12/85 at 4 48 kg/ha.  First water sample was taken
        Grapes"   Study submitted by Rhone Poulenc Ag  Company   L 1 years after application, 5 weeks, 1 in the center of
        1988                                                    plot, and 4 outside of plot, one  15 meters from each of 4
                                                               sides of the plot

 C0001   Miller, M P  , E  P   Savage,  D D  Adrian,  M J  Aaronson,  Information confirmed by E. P  Savage, Colorado State
        T  J   Keefe,  D H  Haroar, and J T  Tessari, "Groundwater  University on August 9, 1988 with a telephone conversation
        Transport of  the Herbicide  Atrazine,  Weld County,       with  Douglas W  Parsons
        Colorado", Colorado State University  Institute of Rural
        Environmental Health and Oept   o£ Pathology, and
        Louisiana State  University  Dept  of Civil Engineering,
        1987

 CT001   Letter dated  8/27/86 to Stuart  Cohen, u  S EPA/OPP/HED  This  information was confirmed by Gregory J  Piontek, of
        from  Bradford Robinson, State of  Conneticut, Dept  of   the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection,
        Environmental Protection                                with  a  letter dated August 24, 1988 addressed to Douglas W
                                                               Parsons, USEPA
CT002  Connecticut Department of Environmental  Protection,
       "Study of Pesticide Contamination  in Connecticut's
       Ground Water",   Interim  Report, Febuary  1988
This information was confirmed by Gregory J  Piontek of
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, with a
letter to Douglas W  Parsons, USEPA, dated August 24, 1988
FL001  Letter dated L/4/&8 to M. Locbec, U S  EPA/OPP  from R
       Inman,  Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer
       Services
Describes findings of Bromacil in Florida
This record is supecceded by later records and
corespondences
FLQ02  Letter dated 6/30/87 to M  Lorber, U S  EPA/OPP/HED,
       from H  A  Moye,  University of Florida - Gainesville

       Letter dated 11/20/87 to M  Lorber, U S  EPA/OPP/HED,
       from M  H  Maglodi, University of Florida -
       Gainesville
Correspondence describes 1st and 2nd round analytical
results Erom sampling sponsored by U S  EPA, Florida DER,
and Umv  of Florida in Collier County, Florida   The
analytical results ace derived from the documents entitled
"Report on Spring/Fall Season Sampling o£ Phase  I (October
- January 1987) and (April - July 1987) of EPA/DER Collier
County Water Study  Analysis of Water Samples
This information was confirmed by Steve Dwinell, Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation, with a telephone
conversation with Douglas W  Parsons, USEPA
FLOOJ  Environmental Science and Engineering,  Inc
                                                               This  information  is  not  confirmed
                                                          E-2

-------
 page No
 11/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Re£
Numoei:
Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
       "Health-Based Target Concentrations for Tropical
       Researcn and Education Center (TREC),  Homestead,
       Florida", ESE &87-362-0100-2130, prepared for the
       Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS),
       University of Florida, Gainesville, Dec  1987

       Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc ,
       "Health-Based Target concentrations for North Florida
       Research and Education Center (NFREC), Quincy,
       Florida", ESE &67-J62-0102-2140, prepared for the
       Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS),
       University of Florida Gainsville, Oct  1987

       Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc ,
       "Health-Based Target Concentrations for Everglades
       Research and Education Center (EREC),  Belle Glade,
       Florida", ESE «87-362-0100-2130, prepared for the
       Institute of fodd and Agricultural Sciences,  (IFAS)
       University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida   October
       1987

FL004  Letter dated 8/18/87 to H. Lorber, U S  EPA/OPP,  from    Letter with attachment summarizing Florida Dept  of
       R Inman, Florida Dept  of Agriculture and Consumer       Agriculture and Consumer Services' demiting watec >
-------
 Page No
 L1/2L/88
                                            PESTICIDES  IN  GROUND WATER  DATA  BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Re£
 Number
Full Reference
                                                               Comments
        Agricultural  Company

 FL902  Florida Department  of  Environmental  Regulation,          42  sites  in  10 counties  - each site given a separate
        summaries  of  monitoring  results  from observation wells   subreference number   This study was updated and coded by
        at  filed testing  sites jointly run by DER  and  Union      Matt  Lorber  in October,  1988
        Carbide Agricultural Products  Company,  1986

 FL903  Union  Carbide,  "Temik  Aldicarb Pesticide Residues  in
        Florida",  Union Carbide  Agricultural Products  Company,
        Inc  ,  Research  Triangle  Park,  North  Carolina,  1983

 FL904  Miller,  W  M  , J M  Davidson, J A Foran, and H A  Moye,  Congressionally mandated study, extensive sampling  in 30+
        "The Florida  Temik  Study Groundwater Monitoring",        countiessaid to represent 84% of ground-water drinking
        prepared for  U  S  EPA, contract  no   CR811606,  prepared   water in  monitored counties. This  information was confirmed
        by University of  Florida,  1984                          by  Anson  Moye, University of Florida.
FL905  Union Carbide, summaries of monitoring  data  for
       aldicarb  in Florida  near Lake  Hamilton,  1986
                                      Update provided annually   Last update dated 1/31/86,  last
                                      cover letter found dated 8/13/85 to M  Branigan,  U S
                                      EPA/OPP/RD from J  Lovell,  Union Carbide Agricultural
                                      Products Co ,  Inc
GAOOl  McConnell, J B  ,  "Movement and  Fate o£  Ethylene
       Dibromide  in Ground Water  in  Seminole County, Georgia",
       U S  Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations
       Report 87-5030, Doraville, Georgia,  1987
HIOOl  Memorandum dated  5/20/87  to C
       Kaneshiro, EPA Region  IX.
             Jones,  (1 S  EPA from B
"News Release" attached with no specific data and only
general info on Atrazine and Hexazinone, well records
attached unrelated to "News Release", additional memo
attached reporting further findings of Atrazine, poor data
for number compilation
This data is NOT confirmable
HI002  Oki, D S  and T S. Giambelluca,  "DBCP,  EDB, and TCP      Data  is  compilation  and  summary of  monitoring efforts by
       Contamination of Ground Water  in Hawaii",  University of  different  agencies and  individuals    Included are well data
       Hawaii, draft paper submitted  to Journal of Contaminant  logs  which  are  used  to estimate average concentrations of
       Hydrology in February 1986                               the  three  pesticides - source and reference of these logs
                                                                unknown
                                                                No confirmation work done as of October 3,  1988
HI003  Letter with attachment dated  1/26/88  to M   Lorber,
       U S EPA/OPP/HED from W  Wong, State of Hawaii,
       Department of Health, Environmental Protection  and
       Health Services Division
                                      waiting for response
HI004  Letter dated 1/18/88 to Richard Mountfort,
       U S EPA/OPP/RD from Karen Stumpf, CI3A-GEIGY
       Corporation, Agricultural Division
                                      Enclosed attachment
                                      Borg,  J ,  "Pesticides found in 8 Oahu Wells", article
                                      unidentified newspaper dated 10/31/87
                                                          E-4

-------
Page No      5
11/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ref
Number
Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
                                                               This reference is NOT confirraable

IA.001  HaLlberg, G R ,  R D  Libra, E A  Bettis, and 8 E        Confirmation updated by Tary Becker on 9/22/88   This
       Hoyer,  "Hydrogeologic and Water Quality Investigations  information was confirmed by Robert D  Libra,  Iowa
       in the Big Spring Sasin, Clayton County, Iowa, 1983     DepatUnent o£ Natural Resources with a letter to Douglas w
       Water-Year",  Iowa Geological Survey Open File Report    Parsons,  USEPA, dated August 31, 1988
       34-4
IA002  Libra, R D ,  C R  Hallbecg, G G. Ressmeyer, and B E
       Hoyer, "Groundwater Quality and Hydrogeology o£
       Devonian-Carbonate Aquifers in Floyd and Mitchell
       Counties, Iowa", Iowa Geological Survey Open File
       Report 34-2,  1984
                                      Confirmation updated by Tery Becker on September 27,  1388
                                      This information was confirmed by Robert D  Libra,  Icwa
                                      Department of. Natural Resources with a letter to Douglas w
                                      Parsons, USEPA, dated August 31, 1988
IA003  Kelley, R  and W  Wnuk, "Little Sioux River Synthetic   This information was confirmed by Richard D  Kelley, Iowa
       Organic Compound Municipal Well Sampling Survey", Iowa  Department of Natural Resources with a letter to Douglas w
       Department of Water, Air,  and Haste Management, March   Parsons, USEPA, dated September. 14, 1988
       1986                                                    This reference needs to be updated with report published
                                                               March 1988
IA004  Kelly, Richard D   Synthetic Organic Compound Sampling  Name  Iowa DWAWM changed to Iowa Department of Natural
       Survey of Public Water Supplies
       Water, Air and Waste Management
                Iowa Department of
                April 1985
Resources
This information was confirmed by Richard D  Kelley, Icwa
Department of Natural Resources with a letter to Douglas w
Parsons, USEPA, dated September 14, 1988
IA005  Baker, J L  and T A  Austin, "Impact o£ Agricultural
       Drainage Wells on Groundwater Quality", Completion
       Report 1981 - 1983, EPA Grant No. G007228010.
       Departments of Agricultural Engineering and Civil
       Engineering, Iowa State University,  1983
                                      This study was designed  to monitor water  from  drainage
                                      wells,  therefore we will not use  this  information  -  due to
                                      the known point source of contamination.
ID001  Campbell, Linford J  , "Concentrations of  Pesticides  in   95  pesticides  looked  for  in 106 samples   13 positives but
       Irrigation Return Flows  Influent  to Haste  Disposal
       wells in Southern Idaho",  Idaho Dept  of water
       Resources, April 1982
                                       all  below drinking water  standards   Part of Idaho DWR
                                       Irrigation Disposal Well  Alternatives Study
                                       This information was confirmed by Linford J  Campbell,
                                       Idaho Department of water Resources with a letter to
                                       Douglas W  Parsons, USEPA,  dated August 18, 1988
ID901  Brokopp, C D  ,  "Examination  of  Drinking  Water for
       Aldicarb", Idaho  Pesticide Hazard  Assessment Project,
       State of Idaho, Dept   of  Health and Welfare, April
       L981

IL001  Felsot, A  , "Survey for Pesticides in Ground-Water
       Supplies  m Illinois",  prepared by Illinois Natural
       History Survey,  1985
                                                                Report documents calculated half-lives, numerous states
                                       This information is NOT confirmed   Douglas W  Parsons,
                                       USEPA spoke with Allan Felsot on August S, 1988 and he did
                                       not like the quality and design of the study
                                                            E-5

-------
 Page No
 li/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Re£
 Number
                          Full Reference
                                                                                         Comments
 IL002  McKenna,  D P  and S J  Chou,  "Agncultrual Chemicals in
        Ground Water in Mason County",  Illinois state
        Geological Survey,  Champaign,  Illinois, 1987

 ILOOJ  Cobb,  R P  and C L  Sinnott,  "Organic Contaminants in
        Illinois  Ground Water",  Illinois Environmental
        Protection Agency,  Springfield,  Illinois,  1987
This information was confirmed by Carol Sinnott, Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency with telephone calls to
Douglas W  Parsons, USEPA.
 IN001   Indiana  Department of  Environmental  Management
        "Assessment of  Nonpoint Source Pollution  of  Ground
        Water  in Indiana"   July,  1988
This is the first assessment of pesticides in ground water,
contains some monitoring results and discusses future
studies
 KS001.   Robbins,  Vic,  "Pesticides  in Kasas  Ground Water",
        Kansas  Dept  of  Health  and Environment,  Bureaus of
        Water Protection,  Water Protection,  Water Quality
        Assessment,  May  1988

 KS002   Robbins,  Vic,  Kansas  Dept   of Health &  Environment,
        personnel communication to  W M  Williams,  U" S
        EPA/OPP,  8/12/88
Summarizes three statewide surveys.  U Kansas Gcoundwater
Quality Monitoring Netowrk (started 1976),  2) Phases 1 and
2 Farmstead Well Survey (1986-1987), and 3) Public Water
Supply Well Survey (1987)
 LA001  H  F   "Butch" Calhoun  III,  1987  Survey of  Louisianna     Counties    Morenouse,  Caldwell,  Franklin,  Tensas,  Bossier,
       Ground Water for  Pesticides    Louisianna  Department of   Natchitoches,  Avoyelles,  Tangipahoa,  Acadia,  Iberia,
       Agriculture &  Forestry,  April  26,  1988                  Lafourche,  Plaguemines
                                                                Mailed  confirmation out on Sept  27,  1988
MA001  Sylva, S R  , A. Schumacher,  B   walker,  Jr ,  and  J  S
       Hyte,  "1985 Sumnary  Report.  Interagency Pesticide
       Monitoring Program",  publication
       *U,6S3-1.5-200-1.2-86-CR,  prepared by  the Interagency
       Pesticide Task Force consisting o£ KA Dept  of
       Environmental Quality Engineering,  MA Dept.  of Food and
       Agrigulture, MA Dept  of  Public Health,  and  MA
       Executive Office of  Environmental Affairs, Dec   1986
Study designed to look for pesticides in ground water near
potato and/or tobacco; all counties - 27 townships sampled,
80% private, 14% public drinking water wells
Waiting
MA002  Cape Cod Planning and Economic  Development Commission,   Joint study conducted by US EPA/OPP and CCPEDC   4 golf
       "Project Summary   Cape Cod Golf Course  Ground  Water     courses,  4  observation wells per course,  1 well each of
       Monitoring", April 1987                                  background,  green,  tee,  and fairway
                                                                Requires  more work''

MA901  Letter dated 3/19/85 to F T  Sanders,  U  S  EPA/OPTS     Summarizes  Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture
       from J  S  Lovell, Union Carbide Agricultural Products   findings
       Company

MA902  Jones,  R L   "Progress Report   Measurement of  Aldicarb Cooperative field research project between registrant and
       Degradation and Movement in a Massachusetts Potato      Massachusetts Department of Agriculture   Study included 22
       Field"   Study submitted by Rhone Poulenc Ag Company     wells,  11 clusters  with1 1 upgradiant; 3 onsite, 7, 10-100
                                                            E-6

-------
 Page No
 11/21/38
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ret"
Number
                         Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
                                                               meters down gradient, and the application cats was 2 24
                                                               kg/ha on 6/86

MDQOl  Pinto, E , "Report of Groundwater Contamination Study   Study evaluated 1,2-Qichlotopropar;e (from Telone, D-D.
       in Wicomico County, Maryland", prepared by
       Environmental Health Division, Wicomico County Health
       Deparroent, June 1980
                                                               among ether identified pesticide trade names given) and
                                                               DBCP in groundwater by sampling existing domestic and
                                                               irrigation on and near fields of known use - also drilled
                                                               sorae new observation wells which also had positives
                                                               indicating source of contamination was normal use
                                                               This study needs more work - because there was a followup
                                                               report

                                                               Describes findi.ngs of DBCP and 1,2-Dichloropropane in
                                                               Maryland - with attachments   Study by MD Dept of Health
                                                               and Mental Hygiene, "Study of Ground Water Contamination in
                                                               Wicomico County, MD, 1980-81"   Analyzed by two labs  Dow
                                                               values consistantly lower probably due to loss in headspace
                                                               of samples

MD003  State of Haryland, "Results of a Maryland Ground Water  Confirmation updated by Tery Becker on 9-22-88   This
       Herbicide Reconnaissance Survey, Spring, 1987,"         information was confirmed by Donald L. Elmore, Maryland
       prepared by the Maryland Department of the Environment  Department of the Environment with a letter to Douglas W
                                                               Parsons, USEPA, dated September 12, 1988
MD002  Letter dated 1/31/80 to H  Jacoby, U S  EPft from A E,
       Schober, Registration Specialist, Dow Chemical
MD004  Isensee, A R , C S  Helling, T J  Gisn, P.C  Kearney,   This information was confirmed by Allan R   Isensee, United
       C B. Cofftnan, and W  Zhuang, "Groundwater Residues of
       Atrazine, Alacnlor, and Cyanazine under No-tillage
       Practices", Chemospnere, Vol 17, No 1, pp 165-174,
       1988
                                                               States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research
                                                               Service with a letter to Douglas W. Parsons, USEPA dated
                                                               August 29, 1988
ME001  Tolman, A L , "First Annual Report - Pesticides  in
       Ground Water Study", Open File Ho, 86-1J, Maine
       Geological Survey, Department of Conservation,  1986
                                                               Poorly described study - not clear how many pesticides
                                                               sampled in 46 wells/60 samples, only positives  listed,  not
                                                               all wells sampled for all pesticides, all  positives
                                                               described as "trace" - detected but less  than MLD for which
                                                               statiscally sound recovery data is available
                                                               This study is superceded by ME002, the Second Annual
                                                               Report
ME002  Neil, Craig D  , Williams, John S  and Meddle, Thomas  K
        "Second Annual Report - Pesticides  in Ground Water
       Study "  Maine Geological Survey, Department of
       Conservation   1987
                                                               This study supercsdes  the  First  Annual Report (MEOOH    It
                                                                is  a three yea;  evaluation of  P/CW,  and represents the
                                                                "worst  case  situation  "  Dinoseb was detected greater  than
                                                                the Health Advisory (i e  2ug/L)
ME901  Letter dated 8/27/85  to M   Branagan,  U  S  EPA/OPP/RD
       from J S  Level1, Union Carbide Agricultural  Products
       Co  , Inc
                                                                Updates submitted annually
                                                            E-7

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES IN GROUND  WRIER  DATA  BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
 Number
                         Full Reference
                                                                                         Comments
 ME302  Inter -departmental  memorandum dated 1/6/88 to State of   Includes  attachments  and  a  letter dated  12/U/87  to Rober
        Maine Pesticides  Control  Board  from  Henry Jennings,
        State of  Maine Pesticides control  Board
                                                               Bateese,  Jr ,  Maine Dept  of Agriculture,  Board of
                                                               Pesticides control from Mitchell Peele,  Rhone-Poulenc Ag
                                                               Company
                                                               Henry Jennings,  Maine Department o£ Agriculture looked over
                                                               the numbers and  said they were all correct,  but he can not
                                                               add any information on the analytical technique since Union
                                                               Carbide did all  the analytical work

MI001  Letter dated 8/24/87 to R F  Mountfort,  U S EPA/OPP/RD  Reported findings of Michigan State University and Michigan
       from Karen Stumpf,  CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Agricultural Dept  of Public  Health,
       Division
 W001  Klaseus, T    "Minnesota  Pesticide Monitoring  Survey     This  report  is preliminary, and  is superceded by MM002,
       Interim Report"  Presented  by  the Minnesota Department  entitled  "Pesticides and Ground-Water Surveys of Selected
       of Agriculture and  the Minnesota Department of  Health,  Minnesota Wells
       at a conference  sponsored by the Freshwater Foundation
       and the V S   Environmental  Protection  Agency, at  St
       Paul, Minnesota, on October 16, 1986
MN002  Klaseus, Tomas G    "Pesticides  and Ground-water  Surveys  Supercedes MN001
       of Selected Minnesota Wells"   Minnesota  Dept  of
       Health, Minnesota Dept  of Agriculture    February,
       1988
                                                               This information was confirmed by Tomas G.  Klaseus,
                                                               Minnesota Department of Agriculture with many letters and
                                                               telephone calls to Douglas W  Parsons,  USEPA, in September
                                                               1988
MS001  Mississippi State University,  "Mississippi Pesticide
       Hazard Assessment Project", Annual Progress Report No
       15, Mississippi State Chemical Laboratory,
       Missississippi State, MS, May  1984.
MT001  Montana Department o£ Agriculture,  "A Survey of
       GroundwaterContanination by Pesticides  in Montana"
       Prepared by Environmental Management Division, August
       1987
                                                               Supported by EPA/OPP/HED/EAB under agreement number CR JIO
                                                               687-1   32 pesticides were looked for in 143 water samples
                                                               from 10 counties,  including organochlorine,
                                                               organophosphate,  phenolic pesticides, phenoxy herbicides
                                                               and aldicarb
                                                               This information was confirmed by Larry G  Lane,
                                                               Mississippi State Chenucal Laboratory, MSU with a letter to
                                                               Douglas W  Parsons,  USEPA, dated September 21, 1988

                                                               Ongoing study,  health guidelines presented, funded by EPA
                                                               Three distinct  agricultural production areas including one
                                                               highly vulnerab> aquifer   Wells 14-250 ft deep
NCOOl  Letter dated 4/28/87 to R  Taylor, U S  EPA/OPP/RD  from  information  letter   registrant will  continue investigation
       T J  Parshley, CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Agricultural      and  keep EPA informed.   This information was confirmed by
       Division, Greensboro, NC                                 Karen  S  Stumpf,  CIBA-GEIGY,  with a  letter to Tereas
                                                                Seeker,  USEPft,  dated October 24,  1988
NC002  Letter dated 10/8/81 to Lois Rossi, EPA/OPP/RD  from
       Karen Stumpt, CIBA-GEIGY corporation, Agricultural
                                                               Findings from "most recent round of  sampling in ongoing
                                                               monitoring project"   EPA/OPP/KED has requested EPA/OPP/RD
                                                           E-8

-------
Page No
11/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ref
Number
                  Full Reference
                                                                                 Comments
       Division                                                to obtain more information on monitoring study   This
                                                               information has been confirmed by Karen S  Stumpf,
                                                               CIBA-GEIGY with a letter CO Teresa Becker, USEPA, dated
                                                               Octobet 24, 1988

NC901  North Carolina Department of Agriculture, "Preliminary  Accompanied by letter dated 8/24/84 to Information Services
       Report   Aldlcarb Groundwater Survey Pilot Project,
       Winter/Spring 1982-1983", pcepaced by Pesticide
       Section, Food and Drug Protection Division, June 13,
       198J
                                                        Section,  U S  EPA/OPP from J.  Graham,  State of North
                                                        Carolina Department of Agriculture.  This information was
                                                        confirmed by Henry Wade,  NCDA with a letter to D  Parsons,
                                                        USEPA dated 9/19/88
ND001  Glatt, L D ,  "Pesticide and Herbicide Survey of
       Selected Municipal Drinking Water Systems in North
       Dakota",  Noth Dakota State Department of Health, L986
                                                        Confirmation updated by Tery Becker on 9/22/88
                                                        This information was confirmed by David Glatt, North Dakota
                                                        State Department of Health and Consolidated Laboratories
                                                        with the completed analytical questionnaire and corrections
                                                        on the data base printout.
MD002  Glatt, I D ,  "1985 Ground Water Investigation to        Confirmation updated by Tery Becker on 9/22/88
       Determine the Occurrence of Picloram in Selected Well   This information was confirmed by David Glatt, North Dakota
       Sites of Rolette County, North Dakota", Division o£     State Department of Health and Consolidated  laboratories
       Water Supply and Pollution Control, North Dakota State  with the questionnaire and corrections on  the data  base
       Department of Health, Bismark, North Dakota, Dec. 1985  printout sheet.
ND003
Lym,  R G  and C G  Messersmith, "Survey for Picloram in This information was confirmed by Rodney G  Lym, North
       North Dakota Groundwater", draft report, Dept. of
       Agronomy, North Dakota State University, L987
                                                        Dakota State University with a letter to Douglas w
                                                        Parsons, USEPfk dated fkugust 10, 1988   This  Letter  included
                                                        a copy of the final, report and information which is more
                                                        refined
ND004  Prunty, Lyle and Montgomery, Bruce R.   "Temporal
       Pesticide Leaching Through  Irrigated Sandy  Loam Soil"
       North Dakota State University, Department of Soil
       Science   October 30, 1988.
NE001  Exner, H.E. and R.F. Spalding,  "Ground-Water
       Contamination and Hell Construction  in Southeast
       Nebraska", Groundwater, Vol   23(l):26-34,  1985

NE002  Chen, H  H  and A D  Druliner,  "Non-point  Source
       Agricultural Chemicals in Ground Water  in  Nebraska  --
       Preliminary Results  for Six Areas of  the High  Plains
       Aquifer", U S  Geological Survey, Water-Resources
       Investigative Report 86-4338,  Lincoln, ME,  1987
                                                        Sampling of  268 private drinking water  wells in Southeast
                                                        Nebraska for nitrates, total  coliform,  atrazine and
                                                        alachlor

                                                        Part of USCS  1984 Toxic Waste/Ground-Water Contamination
                                                        Program   Hydrogeologic background given   Includes
                                                        Literature  review of  other  findings
                                                        This  information was  confirmed by  Abraham Chen, United
                                                        States Geological Survey  with a letter  to Douglas W
                                                        Parsons, USEPA, dated September 20, 1988
NE003  Rettig, B   and Jacobs, C     "1985  Domestic Well Water
       Sampling in Central Nebraska-  Laboratory Findings and
       Their  Implications"   Nebraska Department of Health
                                                         This  is  the first of a four year study, 21 counties
                                                         involved   Surveying 3 different strata - comparing
                                                         nitrates,  bacteria,  radiation and pesticides in
                                                            E-9

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA  BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
 Number
                         Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
        1985
 NE004  Jacobs,  Candace  "Domestic Well  Hatec  Sampling in
        Nebraska,  1986  Laboratory Findings and Their
        Implications"   Nebraska  Department  of  Health    1986
                                                               groundwater   This information was confirmed by Candace A
                                                               Jacobs, Nebraska State Health Department through
                                                               ccrespondences with Douglas W  parsons, USEPA during
                                                               September 1988

                                                               This is the second year ot this study, with 11 counties
                                                               involved   This information was confirmed by Candace A
                                                               Jacobs, Nebraska State Health Department through direct
                                                               cotespondences with Douglas W  Parsons, USEPA, during
                                                               September 1988
 NE005   Jacobs, Candace A    "Domestic Well Water  Sampling  in
        Nebraska,  1987 Laboratory Findings and  Their
        Inplications"  Nebraska  Department of Health.   1987
                                                               This is the third year of this study   22 counties
                                                               involved, with 6.92% positive detections   This information
                                                               was confirmed by Candace A  Jacobs, Nebraska State Health
                                                               Department through direct corespondences with Douglas W
                                                               Parsons, USEPA, during September 1988
 NE901  Jones, R  L  , Kirkland, S  D  and Chancey,  E  L             Experimental  field site  2 miles south of Bartlett, NE,
       "Measurement of Environmental  Fate  of  Aldicarb Residues  1  68kq/ha  applied  to  corn;  15  shallow wells,  5  clusters of
       in a Nebraska Sand  Hills  Soil"  Applied Agriculture      j  wells, wells  located   3 upgradient, 2 on-site and  2
       Research, Volume 2(3)  177-182    1987                     downgradient
NJ001  U S  Geological Survey,  "Preliminary  Assessment  of
       Water Quality and  It's Relation  to  Hydrogeolcgy  and
                                                               Transmitted with letter dated 9/3/86 to M. Lorber,
                                                               U 5 EPA/OPP/HED from P  Leahy, U S  Geological Survey, New
        Land Use   Potomac-Rantan-Magothy  Aquifer.  System, New   Jersey  District    Funded  by  U90S Toxic Haste  Program, one
        Jersey", preliminary  unnumbered Water-Resources          of  14 natiowide projects.
        Investigation Report, New  Jersey  District,  September     This information  is  superceded  by  NJ002,  the  final version
                                                                of  the  same  report

                                                                This report  supercedes NJ001, because this is the final
                                                                version, while NJ001 was  "Preliminary "     This  report
                                                                analyzes the influence of land  use on ground  watec quality
                                                                in  the  Potoroac-Haritan-Magothy  Aquifer system   This
       1986
NJ002  Barton, Cynthia ,  Vowinkel, Eric F. and Nawyn, John
       "Preliminary Assessment of Hater Quality and  Its
       Relation to Hydrogeolcgy and Land Use-
       Potomac-Raritan-Hagothy Aquifer System, New Jersey "
       U  S  Geological Surwy, Water-Resources  Investigations  information  was  confirmed by Eric  Vowinkel,  USGS,  west
       Report 87-4023.  1987.                                   Trenton,  NJ  with a letter to Douglas W  Parsons,  USEPA
                                                                dated October  5,  1988.

NJ901  New Jersey State Department of Health,  "Report  on  a      Transmitted  via  letter  dated 2/16/84 to F T  Sanders,  'J S
       Survey Of Temik Concentrations in Cumberland and Salem   EPA/OPP/RD from  J S.  Lovell,  Union Carbide Agricultural
       Counties, August - December 1983",  *H318-83,             Products  Co  ,  Inc
       Environmental Health Program, 1984                       This data is suspect and cannot be confirmed

NJ902  Letter dated 10/27/83 to F T  Sanders,  U  S  EPA/OPP/RD
       frcn J S  Lovell, Union Carbide Agricultural Products
       Co ,  Inc

NM001  "Pesticides in Ground Hater, New Mexico's Monitoring
       Program," Ground Water/Hazardous Waste  Bureau,  New
                                                         E-10

-------
 Page No      11
 11/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
Number
Full Reference
       Mexico Environmental  Improvement Division, prepared by
       Dennis McQuillan
                                                                                        Comments
NYOOl  HoLden, Patrick, "Pesticides and Groundwater Quality
       Issues and Problems in Four States", prepared for the
       Board on Agriculture, National Research Council,
       National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press,
       Washington, D C  124 pp  1986
                                      This document was renamed from NY001  to US002 on 10/6/88
NY002  Kim, N K and D W  Stone, "Organic Chemicals and
                                      From Appendix E  "New York State Department of Health and
       Drinking Water", New York State Dept. of Health, April  United States Geologic Survey Joint Study - Reconnaissance
       1981                                                    of Organic Contamination of New York State Aquifers,
                                                               Selected Water Sampling Sites Outside of Long Island, June
                                                               1978 - October 1978"
                                                               This information is NOT confirmable because raw data not
                                                               retained (letter from Kenneth Slade, New York Department of
                                                               Health, to D W. Parsons, USEPA dated 9/13/88
NYOOJ  Siade, Kenneth, "Report of Statewide Surveillance of
       Organic Compounds in Selected Community Water Systems,
       New York State, 1984 - 1985", New York State Department
       of Health, Bureau of Public Water Supply Protection,
       April 1987
                                      Waiting,  response not expected back till Oct 20,  1988
NY004  Letter dated J/19/86 to Mike McKavit, U S EPA from W S  Confirmation information recieved from William Neubeck,
       Neubeck, New York State Department of Law,              Professional Geologist 9/21/88
       Environmental Protection Bureau
NY005  Harris, D  and A  Andreoli, "Summary Pesticide Sampling This information is superceded by the  information  £com
       Program 1980 - 1985 prepared for Pesticide/Groundwater  Dennis Moran, entitled "Status Report  - Pesticide  Sampling
       Status Meeting - March 25, 1986", prepared by Drinking  Program  1980-1987" references as NY009
       Water Section, Bureau of Water Resources, Suffolk
       County Department of Health Services, March  1986

NY006  Loria, R ,  R.E. Eplee, J.H. Baier, T M  Martin, and     This information was confirmed by Rosemary  Loria,  Cornell
       D D  MOyer, "EHicacy of of G>cop-Shank Fumigation with University with a  letter  to Teresa M  Becker,  USEPA,  dated
       1,3-Dichlocoptopene against Pratylenchus Penetrans and  October  27,  1988.
       Subsequent Groundwater Contamination", Plant Disease
       70 42-45,  1976
NY007  Letter dated 10/18/84 to E  Habbrouch  trom Mactin
       Trent. Court-/ of Suffolk, Department of Health
       Services
                                      This information is NOT confirmable because documentation
                                      is inadequate
NTO08  Letter dated 10/18/84 to A  Tosi  from Martin  Trent,
       County of Suffolk, Department of  Health Services

NY009  Harris, David and AndreoLi, Aldo    "Status  Report
                                      This information  is NOT confirmabie  because  documentation
                                      is inadequate

                                      This report supercedes all  the  previous information for
                                                          E-ll

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
             12
                                            PESTICIDES IN GROUND  WATER  DATA BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Re£
 Number
                          Full  Reference
                                                                                        comments
        Pesticide Sampling  Program 1980-1987  "   Suffolk  County   Suffolk County    It  is a comprehensive assessment of ail
        Department of  Health  Services,  Bureau of  Drinking        the monitoring between 1980 and  1988
        Water   May 1988                                        This  information  was confirmed by Dennis Moran, Suffolk
                                                                County Department of Health Services with a  letter to
                                                                Douglas W   Parsons,  USEPA, dated September 26,  1988
 NY010  Slade,  Kenneth  E ,  "Report of  statewide  Surveillance of
        Organic Compounds  in Selected  Community  Water Systems,
        1985-1986,"  New York State Department  of Health.

 NY011  Slade,  Kenneth  £ ,  "Report of  Statewide  Survellance of
        Organic Compounds  in Selected  Community  Water Systems,
        1986-L987,"  New York State Department  of Health

 NY901  Hughes,  H  B  F  ,  K  S  Porter, and  J  E   Dewey,  "Results
        of  1933 Upstate New fork  Sampling of Ground  Water  for
        Mdicarb", Cornell  University,  Ithaca, NY, Nov  1983
Separate statistics foe 6 counties, all potato growing
areas, also summarized here in additional sampling by Union
Carbide This information was confirmed by Steven Pacenka,
Cornell University with a letter to Douglas W  Parsons,
USEPA dated November 7, 1988
NY902  Hughes, H B F  and K S   Porter,  "Tracking  Aldicarb
       Residues in Long  Island  Ground  Water;  Results  of  1980,
       1983, and 1984 Sampling",  Water Resources  Program,
       Center  for Environmental Research, Cornell University,
       June  1985
Three groups of wells, termed "shallow", "medium", and
"deep", tested.  Concluded that residues are moving deeper
 Wells probably included in Suffolk County Dept  of Health
monitoring, but uniquely tested for this study
This study is obsolute, see study entitled' Changing
Udicarb Residue Levels in Soil and Ground Water, Eastern
Long Island, New York.
NY903  Jones, R L.  "Progress  Report: Measurement of  Aldicarb   Experimental  field  site,  a  total  of  3  54  kg/ha  of  aldicarb
       Degradation and Movement  in  an Upstate New York  Potato   was  applied on  6/86 to  potatoes.   25 wells  were installed
       Field"  Study submitted by Rhone  Poulenc  Ag. Company.    with 2-3 wells  in each  cluster.   One cluster upgradient,  4
       1988                                                     down gradient at 5-30 meters from field edge and remainder
                                                                on site
OKOOl  Oklahoma State Dept. of Agriculture,  "Exploratory  Study Objectives   1)  determine extent  of  OV contamination,  2)
       on the Extent of Ground-Hater Contamination  from
       Agricultural Use of Selected Pesticides  in Oklahoma
       (Pesticides in Ground Water)", submitted  to  the
       Oklahoma Pollution Control Coordinating  Board  and  U  S
       EPA by the Plant Industry Division, April  1987
infer vulnerable areas, 3) contribute to national database,
4) recommend regulations in OK, and 5) recommend further
monitoring  26 pesticides looked for in suspect wells
This information was confirmed by A L  Bonner and Dave
Warrick at the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture with
correspondences and telephone calls, see file for dates
OR001  Memorandum dated H/7/85, to R  Thiel, U  S   EPA,
       Drinking Water Programs Branch, from G  Bruck,  U  S
       EPA, Drinking Water Programs Branch

PftOOl  Fishel, D K  and P L  Lietman, "Occurrence of Nitrate
       and Herbicides in Ground Water in the Upper  Conestoga
Subject  "Preliminary results of May 1985 ground-water
sampling in Ontario, Oregon area"   EPA Region  10
headquarters in Seattle, WA

Confirmation updated on 9/26/88 by Tery Becker
This information was confirmed by David K   Fishel,  United
                                                           E-12

-------
Page No     13
11/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ret
Number
                         Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
       River Basin, PennsvIvania",  U S  Geological Survey,
       Water Resources Investigations Report 85-4202, 1986
States Geological Survey with a letter to Teresa M  Becker,
USEPA, dated September 23,  1988
PA002  Pionke, H B ,  D E  Glotfelty, A D  Lucas, and J B       This information was confirmed by Dwight E  Glotfelty,
       Urban, "Pesticide Contamination of Ground Waters in the USDA. Agricultural Research Service with a letter to Tecese
       Mahantango Creek Watershed", U S  Dept  of Agriculture, M  Becker, USEPA, dated September 22,  1988
       Agricultural Research Service, 1982

PA003  Buchanan, J W ,  W C  Loper, W P  Schaffastall, and R A  This information is in WATSTORE,  and for this reason the
       Mainly, "Water Resources Data Pennsylvania Water Year   authors will not confirm' it - for it is confirmed in
       1983  Volume 2 - Susquehanna and Potomac River Basins", WATSTORE
       USGS Water Data Report PA-83-2, 1984
PA004  Loper,  W c ,  T E  Behrendt, W P  Schaffstall, and R A
       Hainly,"Water Resources Data Pennsylvania Water Year
       1984 Volume 2 - Susquenanna and Potomac River Basins",
       USGS Water Data Report PA-84-2, 1985

PA005  Letter dated 7/27/87 to D  Mountfort, U S  EPA from K
       Stumpf, Ciba-Geigy Corporation

PA006  Carlson,  Donald B   Letter to Frank L  Davido, from FMC
       Corporation,  dated March 1, 1988
This information is in WATSTORE,  and for this reason the
authors will not confirm - foe it is all ready confirmed in
WATSTORE
RI901  Letters dated 7/24/84 to Dante lonata, Governor of
       Rhode Island from U S  Department of the Interior,
       Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Rhode
       Island

       Letter dated 9/10/84 to C  Offutt, U S  EPA/OPP/HED
       {com U S  Department of the Interior, Geological
       Survey, Water Resources Division, Rhode Island

RI902  Rhode Island Department of Health, "Report of Private
       Well Testing Program for Pesticides", Office of
       Community Health Services/Health Engineering, 1985

SC001  Achari, R G , S 5  Sandhu, and W J  Warren,
       "Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Residues in Ground Water",
       Bulletin of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology,
       Vol 13(U 94-96,  1975
Study jointly with USGS and Rhode Island Water Resources
Board in sand and gravel aquifer in Lower Wood River area
of Washington Co   spurred by Long Island NY aldicarb
contamination
This information was confirmed by David C  Dickerman,
United States Geological. Survey with a letter  to Teresa M
Becker, USEPA, dated September I, 1988
Transmitted via letter dated 3/19/85  to F T  Sanders,  U  S
EPA,  from J S. Lovell, Union Carbide  Agricultural  Products
Co

This  information was confirmed  by  Shingara S   Sandhu.
CLaflin College, with a  letter  to  Teresa  M  Becker,  USEFA,
dated September 12,  1988
SC002  Carter, G E ,  M 3  Riley,  "I,2-Dibroroo-i-Chloropropane  Authors  with  Dept  of  Plant Pathology and Physiology,
       Residues in water in South Carolina  1979-80"
       Pesticides Monitoring Journal  Vol   15, No   3,  pp
       139-142, Dec ,   1981
Clemson  Univ
This  information  was  confirmed by Melissa B  Rilev,  Clemson
University  with a letter to Teresa M  Becker,  USEPA, dated
September 7,  1988
                                                          E-13

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
                                            PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ret
 Number
Full Reference
                                                                                         Comments
 SC901  Hegg,  R 0 ,  Jones,  R L  and Romine,  R R   "Movement and  Feild research  study  including   soil  cores,  lysimeters  and
        Degradation  o£  Aidicarb Residues in  South Carolina      shallow ground  water  monitoring  wells,  fallow  and  soybean
        Loamy  Sand Soil"   Submitted by Rhone Poulenc Ag         plots tested, monitoring wells on  fallow  sites only
        Company   Study competed on November 13,  1987
 SD001   Shade,  D ,  "Pesticides Used in South  Dakota Ground
        Water / Health Risks", prepared by Office of Water
        Quality,  South Dakota Department of Water And Natural
        Resources,  1986
                                      No specific info on monitoring  programs,  only results  on
                                      pesticides detected
 TN001   Personal  correspondence to Mr  David Fege,  U S  EPA,
        from  J  H   French,  Regional Water Management Program,
        Tennessee Valley Authority,  July 22, 1987

 TX001   Burnett,  E ,  R W  Bovey,  R E  Meyer, and C  w            Contains  addendum  reports  and  correspondence on  ground
        Richardson,  "Effect  of  Tebuthiuron on the Quality of     water  positives.
        Ground  Water in  the  Western  Gulf Region", USDA,  ARS and
        Texas Ag   Experment  Station,  1977
TX002  Texas  Department of Agriculture,  "Investigation  of
       Arsenic Contamination  of Ground Water  Occurring  Near
       Knott, Texas,"  1988
                                      Origins due to arsenic pesticides,  cotton gin trash,  and
                                      direct channelling due to poor well construction   This
                                      information was confirmed by Lea Aucelius,  Texas Department
                                      of  Agriculture through direct cocespondences with w  Martin
                                      Williams,  USEPA on October 14,  1988 and numerous telephone
                                      conversations
TX003  "Grassroots, A Texas Department of  Agriculture
       Publication," by TDA,  Spring,  1988.
                                      This information was confirmed by Lea Aurelius,  Texas
                                      Department of Agriculture through corespondences with w
                                      Martin Williams, USEPA,  corespondences dated October 14,
                                      1988
US001  Jones, R L , T W. Hunt, F A. Noms and C  F   Harden,
       "Thiodicorb Insecticide Field Research Studies on  the
       Movement.  Degradation of Thiodicarb  and  its  Metabolite
       Methomyl", F6 HO. AO242, Rhone-Poulenc Ag  Co ,
       Research Triangle Park, MC, Feb.  22,  1988
                                      Field research sites   Submitted under FIFRA 10 (d)  (1)
US002  Hoiden, Patrick, "Pesticides and Groundwater Quality
       Issues and Problems in Four States", prepared  for  the
       Board on Agriculture, National Research Council,
       National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press,
       Washington, D C  124 pp.  1986
                                      Renamed US002 from NY001 on 10/9/88
US900  Union Carbide, "Monitoring Aidicarb Residues  in  Soil
       and Water, 1980", Union Carbide Agricultural  Products
       Company, Inc  , Jacksonville, FL,  1981
                                      Contains information on key studies from Wisconsin, North
                                      And South Carolina,  Maine, New fork, Florida, Virginia,
                                      Washington,  Oregon,  Califorinia, Alabama, Arizona, and
                                      Texas during 1980;  samples were analyzed by both Union
                                                          E-14

-------
 Page No
 li/21/88
            15
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ref
Number
                         Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
US9Q1  Union Carbide, "Monitoring Aldicarb Residues in Soil
       and Water",  Union Carbide Agricultural Products
       Company,Inc ,  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
       1982
Carbide (UC) and the International Research and Development
(IRD) Corporation   For statistical purposes,  one
sample/well/date will be assumed as the mean of the two
samples ("not detected" assumed equal to 0), and a
well/sample will be assumed positive if at Least one of the
samples is positive; mm and max is also mean of the two
samples; two major monitoring programs described  "soil and
water sampling in areas of special interest" and "water
sampling in high-use counties"

Contains information on key studies in New York, Wisconsin,
Florida, Virgina, North Carolina, Maine, and Georgia
Continuation o£ "soil and water sampling in areas of
special interest" studies of UC's 1981 report of same name,
also contiues "water sampling in high-use counties" program
of 1981, but at different states and wells
US902  Bostian, A.L ,  and R L. Jones, "TEMIK Brand Aldicacb
       Pesticide Limited Drinking Water Well Survey",
       Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company, Research Triangle Park, NC,
       March 1, 1988
Submitted uder data requirement guideline 164-1.  No
confidentiality claim under Section 10(d)(1)(A),(B),(C)
Survey was to confirm classification of areas of "Low
risk"
VA001  Letter dated 9/14/79 to A L  Allen, Sussex County
       Health Department from M R  Shepard, Department of
       Health, Commonwealth of Virginia.
Describes findings of Dowicide 70E (80% AI is DBCP)
This data has not been confirmed because responsible
parties not found.
VA002  Goodell, Grant H.  The Effects of Agricultural
       Chemicals on Ground Water Quality in the Northern
       Shenandoah Valley, Virginia. University of Virginia

VTOOl  Pecsonnal communication dated 12/23/87 to M. Lorber,
       U s  EPA/OPP/HED fro» J. Cowtock, Vermont Dept  of
       Agriculture.
Superceded by VT002.
VT002  Personal cowwnication dated 8/12/88 to W M  WiLLiams,
       U S.EPA/OPP fro* J. Contodc, Vermont Dept  of
       Agriculture.
Supersedes  information  in VTOOl
WA001  Washington State Department of Social & Health
       Services, "Results and Implications of the
       Investigation of Ethylene Dibromde m Ground Water  in
       western Washington", prepared by  the Water  Supply  and
       Waste Section, February  1986.

WI001  Note dated 12/10/82 to Ed Johnson, U S  EPA/OPP  from A   Summarizes  joint effort between EPVOPP and Wisconsin
       Barton, U S  EPA/OPP                                     Department  o£  Natural  Resources
WI002  Note dated  12/14/84 to C   Berry  (affiliation
 Note and attachments describe DNR's monitoring program for
                                                          E-15

-------
 Page No
 11/21/88
             16
                                            PESTICIDES [N GROUND >*TER DATA BASE
                                                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
  Ref
 Number
Full Reference
                                                                                         Comments
        unspecified)  from G  Bectcer,  Wisconsin Department of
        Natural Resources
                                      pesticides   Wells described as "private wells"  which  were
                                      "most susceptible to contamination-  wells which  were close
                                      to known pollution sources,  wells near industrial
                                      developments  and areas where sandy soil xxild let
                                      pollutants rapidly percolate to shallow water tables"    For
                                      this reason,  results are qualified as 'suspected point
                                      sources"
 WIOOJ   Postle,  J K  ,  "Ground Hater Monitoring Project foe
        Pesticides",  a progress report submitted by the
        Department of Agriculture,  Trade and Consumer
        Protection to the Department of Natural Resources,
        1987
                                      Contains detailed info on retrospective field sites
                                      evaluating normal use practices for  aldicarb, alactilor,
                                      metnbuzin,  atrazine,  metolachlor, and others   This
                                      information was  confirmed by Jeff  Postle,  Wisconsin
                                      Department of  Agriculture through  direct corespondences
                                      with H  Martin Williams,  USEPA during November 1988.
 WI004   Letter dated  03/26/87  to Richard Mountfort,  U S
        EPA/OPP/HED from  Karen Stumpf,  CIBA-GEIGY Corporation,
        Greensboro, North Carolina
                                      Describes point source contamination at  the IMC Rainbow
                                      Farm Center in Edmund, Wisconsin   7 volumes submitted.  I]
                                      cover letter,  2)  metolachlor soil samples,  3) metolachlor
                                      water samples, 4! sinazine soil samples,  5) simazine ground
                                      water,  6) atrazine soil samples, and 7)  atrazine ground
                                      water   This information was confirmed by Karen S  Stumpf.
                                      at CIBA-GEIGY, with a letter to Teresa Becker,  USEPA,  dated
                                      October 24, 1988.  CIBA-GEIOT requested that we do not use
                                      this data in our data base because it is from a
                                      contaminated site.
WI005   Letter dated  3/25/87  to  R,F  Mountfort and R J  Taylor,  Describes findings of atrazine and metolachlor in private
        U S  EPA/OPP  from K,  Stuwpf,  ClflA-GEIGY Corporation,     drinking wells in  Wisconsin   Wells near Green Bay repotted
        Greensboro, North Carolina.                              to CIBA-GEIGY from Wisconsin Department of Health and
                                                                Social Services.
WI006  Personal conwunication dated July 23,  1987,  to K.
       Lorber, U.S. SPA/OP?, team  K.  testier,  Wisconsin
       Department of Natural Resources.
                                      Details Wisconsin BNR's sampling for alachlor since 1983
                                      Almost all sampling was foe "point source investigations"
                                      Current as of 7/87
WI007  Letter datad 2/3/88  to R. Hauntfort,  U  S EPA/OPP/R0
       from Kami Stuppf, CIBA-GEICY Corporation,  Agricultural
       Division, Greensboro, North Carolina

WI901  Wisconsin Department of Natural  Resources,  summary of    Data supplied by Union Carbide Agricultural Company
       data collected and analyzed by WCNR and Portage County
       Dept  of Health on aldiarb content of domestic wells in
       Wisconsin, 7/31/85
WI902  Letter dated 6/11/84  to M   Branagan,  U  S EPA/OPP/RD
       from J M  Harkin, Environmental Toxicology Center,
       University of Wisconsin, Madison,  Wisconsin
                                      Monitoring results !rm 9 experimental fields in the Central
                                      Sands Region of Wisconsin.
                                                          E-16

-------
Page No
U/21/88
                                           PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER DATA BASE
                                                       BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Ret
Number
Full Reference
                                                                                        Comments
WI903  Letter dated 11/26/85 to H  Lorbec, U S EPA/OPP/HED
       from F A  Jones, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture,
       Trade, and Consumer Protection
                                      Describes "moratorium" areas where aldicarb use is
                                      disallowed   Areas are 1-mile radii around wells found to
                                      contain alidarb in excess of 10 ppb (except 1982 where
                                      criteria was I ppb)
WI904  Rhone Poulenc Ag, Company  "Analysis of Aldicarb        Addendum to WI901, continuation of data collected by
       Residues  Second Quarter Wisconsin Sampling"  Submitted Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources £or private
       by Rhone Poulenc Ag  Company   1988                     drinking water wells.
WI905  Wyman, J A ,  Jones, R L ,  Medina, J ,  Curwen, D  and
       Hansen, J L  "Environmental Fate Studies of Aldicarb
       and Aldoxycarb Application to Wisconsin Potatoes"
       Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2.61-72   1987
                                      Three treatments  3 36 kg/ha at planting; 2.24 k.q/ha at
                                      emergence and 3 36 of aldoxycarb at planting
                                                      E-17

-------
      APPEIOIX F
FULL EMA BASE LISTENS
(Uhder Separate Cover)

-------