&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER: 9240.0-1
TITLE: User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
APPROVAL DATE: 10/01/84
EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/01/84
ORIGINATING OFFICE: OERR/HRSD
StFINAL
D DRAFT
STATUS:
REFERENCE (other documents):
OS WER OS WER OS WE Ft
VE DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE D
-------
03/19/87 United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
EPA OSWER Directive Initiation Request
1. Directlv« Number
9240.0-01
2. Originator Information
Name of Contact Person
CARTER
Mai Cod*
Office
OERR/HRSD
Telephone Number
382-7909
3. Title
USER'S GUIDE TO THE CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM
4. Summary of Directive (Include brief statement of purpose)
Oraganic and inorganic analytical program
descriptions; outlines the requirements and
analytical procedures of new CLP protocols
developed from techinical caucus recommendations,
Reflects the status of the program as of July
1984. (10/84, 220 pp) Table of
contents and front matter only. Handbook
available upon request.
5. Keywords
SUPERFUND, CERCLA, CLP, CONTRACT LAB PROGRAM, LAB ANALYSIS, SAMPLE
ANALYSIS
6a.Does this Ofr eetrve Supercede Previous CHrectrve(s)?j | yes | X{ to What directive (number, title)
b. Does It Supplement Previous Dlr*ctlv*s(s)? | I yes |__XJ No What directive (number, title)
7. Draft Level
I I A-SignedbyAA/DAA
B • Signed by Office Director
• For Review & Comment
In Development
This Request Meets OSWER Directive* System Format
& Signature of Lead Office Directive* Coordinator
Data
9. Name and Title of Approving Official
BIGLANE
Date
10/01/84
OSWER OSWER OSWER
DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE
-------
V
-------
United Strt«
Protection
Offio of Emergency .
•net R*n*dM Ratponw
DC 20480
October 1984
4>EPA
User's Guide r^v-;
.to the :"-.' ':.:':-:-.^r~'---.-' V:''-:
Contract Laboratory Program
", " •>.' r-~.
*** *. ~
-------
FOREWORD
This document has been prepared by the CLP Sample Management Office
specifically for the guidance and direction of program clients.
The organic and inorganic analytical program descriptions herein outline
the requirements and analytical procedures of the new CLP protocols
developed from technical caucus recommendations. These protocols are
being implemented into CLP analysis contracts in 1984. Other analytical
programs, procedures and documentation described herein reflect the
status of the program as of July 19S4.
Updated User's Guide sections containing changes to CLP analytical
programs, procedures and documentation will be provided to clients
periodically, in the form of. User's Guide amendments. For further
information on the CLP or to obtain additional copies of the User's
Guide, contact the Sample Management Office at 703/357-2090 or FTS
357-2*90.
Second Printing
Issued: October 19S4
Rev: 10/84
-------
Page
CHAPTER D DESCRIPTION Of ANALYTICAL SERVICES 12
Menu of Routine Analytical Services (RAS) i 5
Menu of Special Analytical Services (SAS) 16
A. Organic Routine Analytical Services (RAS) 17
1. Sample Matrices, Concentration Levels and Volumes Required 17
2. Compounds Identified and Quantified 19
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements 19
'•4. Analytical Protocols 20
a. Water Method 21
b. Soil/Sediment Method 2i
c. Method Detection Limits 22
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements 22
B. Inorganic Routine Analytical Services (RAS) 25
- 1. Sample Matrices, Concentration Levels, Volumes Required
and Preservation Techniques 25
2. Constituents Identified and Quantified ' 27
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements 27
*. Analytical Protocols 28
a. Water Method 28
b. Soil/Sediment Method 29
c. Detection Limits 29
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements 30
C Oioxin Routine Analytical Services (RAS) 33
I. Sample Matrix and Volume Required 33
2. Isomer Identified and Quantified 34
-------
CLP USER'S GUIDE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER I BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
A* CLP Objective and Orientation 2
B. CLP Structure 3
1. Program Management 3
a. National Program Office (NPO) 3
b. Sample Management Office (SMO) 5
c. Office of Research and Development (ORD), Environmental
Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL/LV) 6
d. National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC) 7
2. Regional Program Support 7
a. Contract Deputy Project Officers (DPO) 7
b. Regional Sample Control Centers (RSCC) &
c. Technical Caucuses 8
d. Regional/Laboratory Communication System 9
3. Clients/Users 9
a. EPA Regions 9
b. States 9
c. Non-Superfund Clients 9
4. Analytical and Support Contractors 13
a. Contract Analytical Laboratories 10
b. Hazardous Substances Laboratories (HSL) 10
c. Sample Bottle Repository 11
-------
Page
C. (Dtoxin RAS - continued)
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements 34
4. Analytical Protocols 35
a. Soil/Sediment Method 35
b. Method Detection Limits 36
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements 36
OL High Hazard Sample Preparation (RAS) 39
1. Sample Matrix, Concentration Level and Volume Required 39
2. Preparation Procedures 40
a. Organic Preparation 40
b. Inorganic Preparation 40
3. Sample Preparation Deliverables 41
4. Potential Follow-Up Analyses 41
E. Special AnaJytical Services (SAS) 42
1. SAS Services 44
a. RAS Plus SAS 44
(1) Fast Turnaround 44
(2) Organic - Special Requirements in Addition to RAS 45
(3) Inorganic - Special Requirements in Addition to RAS 45
(4) Oioxin - Special Requirements in Addition to RAS 46
b. All SAS 46
(1) Organic - Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS 46
(2) Inorganic • Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS 47
(3) Dioxin - Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS 47
(<0 High Hazard Sample Analysis - Organic and Inorganic 47
(5) Special Topics Analysis 4g
2. Contract Deliverable Requirements 48
3. Contract Quality Control Requirements 48
IV
-------
CHAPTER m UTILIZATION OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES <*9
A. Regional Allocation System 51
B. Analysis Citation/Request Procedures 52
1. RA5 Initiation Procedures 52
a. User Information Required 52
b. Lead Time Requirements 53
c. Case Number Assignment and Laboratory Scheduling 53
d. User Knowledge of Analytical Protocols 5
-------
Page
D. Sample Packaging and Siipment 71
1. Packaging Requirements 71
2. Shipping Instructions 72
3. Shipment Coordination • 73
E. Procedures for Problem Resolution 75
1. Resolving Problems Concerning Sample Shipment and Analysis 75
2. Resolving Problems Concerning Analytical Data 75
CHAPTER IV AUXILIARY SUPPORT SERVICES 77
A. Sample Bottle Repository Program 78
1. Types and v^uantities of Bottles Available 78
2. Ordering Procedures •• 81
3. Shipment Information . 82
k. Procedures for Problem Resolution 83
a. Resolving Problems Concerning Bottle Shipment 83
b. Resolving Problems Concerning Bottle Contamination • 83
5. Summary of Bottle Cleaning and Quality Control Procedures 85
B. ^formation Services 87
1. Regional Sample List Report 87
2. Sample Status Information 88
3. General Program Information 88
VI
-------
C, Enforcement Support 29
1. Generation of Enforcement Quality Data 89
a. Chain-of-Custody and Document Control S9
b. NEIC Evidence Audits 90
2. Additional CLP Enforcement Support 91
a. Request Procedures 91
b. Requestor Information Required 91
c. Documentation/Support Provided by CLP 92
D. Cost Recovery Substantiation 93
1. Request Procedures 93
2. Requestor Information Required 94
3. Documentation Provided by CLP 94
EL Data Review Services 96
1. Types of Review Provided 96
2. Request Procedures . 98
3. Requestor Information Required 99
4. Documentation Provided by CLP' 99
-------
Page
Analytical Data Review
111
1. EV1SL/LV Data Review
2. Regional Data Review
111
3. SMO Data Check for Completeness U2
". SMO Data Review Services
G. AnaJyticaJ Methodology Improvement/Development I13
1. Protocol Standardization and Improvement U3
2. Method Development
tx
-------
If
CHAPTER V PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE 101
A. fctterlace with Agency Quality Assurance 102
B. Laboratory Selection Process 100
1. Bid Price 10<*
2. Pre-Award Bid Confirmation 10<*
a. Performance Evaluation Sample Analysis 104
b. Standard Operating Procedures 105
c. Laboratory Evaluation 105
C. Laboratory Start-Up Process 106
1. Provision of Standards to Laboratory 106
2. PO Review of First Data Packages 106
3. PO/DPO Laboratory Visits 106
*. PO/DPO/SMO/Lab Communication 107
D. Laboratory Performance Evaluation 10S
1. Performance Evaluation Sample Analysis 108
2. Laboratory Site Evaluation 108
3. Corrective Action 108
E. Sample Data Evaluation 110
/
1. Inter comparison Check Sample Studies 110
2. Regional Sample Split/Spike Programs 110
VIII
-------
Index to Appendices (continued)
Sample Packaging and Shipment: C-25
Sample Packaging Summary C-26
Sample Shipment Coordination Checklist C-27
Potential Problems with Sample Shipment and Analysis C-28
Telephone Record Log C-29
APPENDIX D: AUXILIARY SUPPORT SERVICES DOCUMENTATION 0-1
Sample Bottle Repository Delivery Order Form D-2
Sample Bottle Repository Packing Ust D-3
Example of Regional Sample List D-4
Case File Purge Materials D-5
Example of NEIC Sample Profile for Organics Samples D-6
Example of NEIC Sample Profile for Inorganics Samples . D-7
OWPE Cost Recovery Checklist D-8
5MO Data Review Request Memorandum D-ll
QA/QC Compliance Report: D-U
Example of Organics Report Forms D-13
Example of Inorganics Report Forms D-29
APPENDIX E: REFERENCES E-l
Analytical References E-2
Safety References E-3
Sampling References E-4
Shipping References
XI
-------
CLP USER'S GUIDE
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: CLP DIRECTORY A-l
EPA Headquarters and National Laboratories A-2
Regional Deputy Project Officers A-4
Regional Sample Control Centers A-5
Sample Management Office A-S
APPENDIX B: RAS DELIYERAfiLES AND DATA REPORTING FORMS B-l
RAS Organic Deliverables Index B-2
RAS Organic Data Reporting Forms B-6
RAS Inorganic Data Deliverables Summary B-2S
RAS Inorganic Data Reporting Forms B-2 9
RAS Dioxin Data Deliverables Summary
RAS Dioxin Data Reporting Forms
APPENDIX Ci SAMPLE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION C-l
Planned Sampling Activity Requiring CLP Analyses Form C-2
Organic Sample Collection Requirements • Water C-3
Organic Sample Collection Requirements - Soil/Sediment C-<*
Inorganic Sample Collection Requirements - Water C-5
Inorganic Sample Collection Requirements - Soil/Sediment C-6
High Hazard Sample Collection Requirements - Liquid and Solid C-7
Dioxin Sample Collection Requirements - Soil/Sediment C-S
Special Analytical Services Client Request Form C-9
Sample Documentation: C-l I
Organic Traffic Report and Completed Example C- 1 2
Inorganic Traffic Report and Completed Example C-l 4
High Hazard Traffic Report and Completed Example C-l 6
Dioxin Shipment Record and Completed Example C-1S
SAS Packing List and Completed Example C-20
Examples of Sample Tag and Custody Seal C-22
Chain of Custody Record and Completed Example C-2 3
-------
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
-------
CLP Structure
The CLP effort involves numerous Agency, contractor and other groups through-
out the country. These organizations are identified and their role in the program
described in the following sections. The following table, Interrelationships of
Program Principals, graphically illustrates the interaction of these groups in the
CLP operation. In addition, Appendix A is a program directory containing
addresses and telephone numbers of key program personnel
I. Program Management
a. National Program Office (NPO)
The CLP is directed by the National Program Office, in EPA
Headquarter* Support Services Branch (SSB), Hazardous Response
Support Division (HR5D), Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response (OERR), in Washington, DC The NPO is comprised of the
National Program Manager, Organic and Inorganic Technical
Officers, and a Quality Assurance Officer, who also provides QA
support to the OERR.
NPO responsibilities include: overall management of the CLP in
terms of program objectives, expansion and interface with clients and
•
other groups; policy, and budget formation and implementation;
administration of analytical and support contracts; development and
technical review of analytical protocols; review of analytical special
services subcontracts and CLP-generated laboratory data; develop-
ment of CLP analytical and support services contracts; monitoring
and formal evaluation of analytical and support contractors; and,
direction of CLP quality assurance (QA) in coordination with overall
OERR QA activities.
-------
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this chapter is to present the basic Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)
objective and orientation, and to familiarize the reader with program structure. This
background information is provided to facilitate better understanding and more
efficient utilization of program services.
A, CLP Objective and Orientation
The CLP supports the Agency's Superfund effort under the 1980 Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) by
providing a range of state-of-the-art chemical analysis services of known quality
on a high-volume, cost-effective basis. The central and overriding assumption
governing the structure and function of the CLP is the basic requirement to
provide legally-defensible analytical results for use in supporting Agency
enforcement actions. Therefore, a high level of quality assurance and docu-
mentation has been incorporated in all aspects of program activities.
The ongoing CLP objective is to develop, manage and improve its analytical
programs in support of all Superfund requirements. This objective is
accomplished by continuously increasing analytical capacity and adjusting
analytical program requirements and related support services to better meet
Agency needs.
The CLP supplies analytical services in direct response to requests from the EPA
Regions, the primary users oi the program. The CLP is a service program
designed to provide a wide range of enforcement-quality analytical services in
response to the changing needs and requirements of the user community. This
client orientation is a key factor in the design and application of all CLP
services and responses.
-------
The National Program Manager (NPM), in addition to directing
program staff, is responsible for the formulation of program policies
and direction; communicates with the Regional and Agency
communities on a continuing basis, keeping all parties apprised of
program activities and receiving input on program effectiveness;
administers several program support contracts; and handles financial
and contractual aspects of the program.
The Organics and Inorganics Technical Officers serve as Project
Officers (POs) on laboratory analytical contracts. The POs are
responsible for technical program decisions, contract administration
and contractor performance evaluation. The POs work closely with
the Regional Deputy Project Officers (DPOs) and laboratories on a
daily basis in resolving technical issues. The POs direct the ongoing
effort to improve contract language and analytical methodologies,
and conduct technical caucuses for purposes of CLP data and
protocol review.
The Quality Assurance (QA) Officer coordinates all aspects of
program application of QA procedures. The QA Officer works closely
with EPA Headquarters Office of Research and Development (ORD)
and the ORD*s Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Las
Vegas (EMSL/LV) which provides QA support to the CLP. The QA
Officer also coordinates with the POs and EMSL/LV in refining and
updating analytical method QA procedures.
b. Sample (Management Office (SMO)
The contractor-operated Sample Management Office functions in
direct support of the NPO, providing management, operations and
administrative support to the CLP. The primary objective of the
SMO operation is to facilitate optimal use of program analytical
resources. SMO activities fall into the following areas: (1) sample
-------
2
S
a
S
oe
§
o
&
M
O
i
Ul
-------
d. National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC)
The NEIC advises the NPO in defining and applying program enforce-
ment requirements, NEIC-developed sample custody procedures,
chain-of-custody records, sample tags and custody seals are utilized
in the CLP to maintain the validity of sample analyses for supporting
Agency enforcement actions. NEIC routinely performs evidence
audits of CLP laboratories and generates sample profiles used in
Agency enforcement litigation. A description of NEIC* evidence
audit process appears in Chapter IV, Section C.
2. Regional Program Support
The Region plays an integral role in program activities, both as the primary
CLP user and as a key part of analytical program management. The
decentralization of program responsibilities to the Regions has evolved
with the expansion of the program, as a means to more effectively direct
program operations nationwide. Extended Regional participation in the
program has and will continue to increase the program's responsiveness to
Super fund requirements,
a. Contract Deputy Project Officers
•
In January, 1984, Regional Administrators appointed a CLP technical
Deputy Project Officer (DPO) for each Regional office. Under
direction of the NPO, the Regional DPO assumes a portion of the
responsibility for monitoring the laboratory contractors physically
located in the Region. The DPO works closely with the NPO Project
Officer in responding to identified problems in laboratory operations
and performs laboratory site evaluations. Other specific DPO
responsibilities will be defined as the system evolves.
-------
scheduling and tracking; (2) Special Analytical Services (SAS) subc-
ontracting; (3) laboratory invoice processing; (
-------
d. Regional/Laboratory Communication System
In January 1983, the NPO established a system of direct
communication between the Regions and contract laboratories, as a
routine method for Regional data review staff to obtain answers to
technical questions concerning program data in the timeliest and
most direct manner possible. In this system, designated Regional
communication contacts call designated laboratory communication
contacts as needed to resolve technical data questions. This
communication link also benefits the laboratory by providing direct
feedback on its data product.
3. Clients/Users
a. EPA Regions
The ten EPA Regions are the primary clients of the CLP. As
described in the previous section, each Region has established a
Regional Sample Control Center (RSCC), which schedules all CLP
analyses requests for the Region, coordinating Regional sampling to
balance with allocated numbers of CLP sample analyses available
each month, and prioritizing the Region's analytical workload when
conflicts occur. RSCC personnel coordinate closely with SMO
throughout Regional sampling events, assisting in tracking sample
shipments to the laboratory and resolving any problems which arise.
in this role, the RSCC also processes analytical requests from state
or other users that are located in the Region's geographical area.
b. States
Under RCRA Section 3012, states undertaking initial site investiga-
tions and entering into cooperative agreements with the government
for cleanup of local waste sites, can utilize CLP services. States
must access CLP analytical services through the RSCC and data
packages are distributed to states through the RSCC.
-------
b. Regional Sample Control Centers (RSCC)
In January, 1984, each Region established a Regional Sample Control
Center to centralize ordering of CLP sample analyses within the Region.
The RSCC is comprised of three or more individuals designated as
CLP Authorized Requestors, with one individual named as the
Primary Authorized Requestor (AR) directing the RSCC The RSCC
is responsible for coordinating the level of Regional sampling
activities to correspond with monthly allocations of CLP analyses.
The Primary AR makes final determinations regarding Regional
analysis priorities when conflicts occur. RSCC ARs routinely place
all Regional requests for CLP analyses, coordinate with SMO during
sampling and sample shipment, and resolve any problems which arise
concerning the samples. The RSCC serves as the central point of contact
for questions concerning Regional sampling efforts.
c. Technical Caucuses
In September 1982, the NPO implemented the concept of Technical
Caucus sessions as a means to consistently utilize the scope of
available technical resources in updating analytical program
methodologies and data reporting requirements. Technical caucuses
are held on a regular basis (usually quarterly) and involve
participation of the following groups: EPA Regions, EMSL/LV,
EMSL/Cincinnati, NEIC, contract laboratories, program support
contractors, SMO, NPO and others, as appropriate. These caucuses
have been instrumental in improving CLP protocols and orienting
deliverable; directly to user needs. Revised organics and inorganics
protocols developed from caucus recommendations, as presented in
Chapter H, Description of Analytical Services, are being
incorporated into program analytical contracts in 19S4.
-------
concentration liquid and solid samples for subsequent organic and
inorganic analysis by CLP or Regional laboratories. A description of
the HH sample preparation RAS program appears in Chapter IL
c. Sample Bottle Repository
The Super fund Sample Bottle Repository program was established by
Che NPO in May 1982, to provide a common source of clean, QC-
tested sampling containers lor samples processed through the CLP.
The objective of the program is to eliminate the potential of bottle
contamination that would affect the validity of sample data. The
contractor-operated repository serves as a central source for several
types of pre-cleaned sampling bottles and is routinely utilized by
Regional and contract personnel performing Super fund sampling
activities. Repository services are detailed in Chapter IV.
11
-------
c. Non-Superfund Clients
Program services are available to support non-Superfuno! clients on a
•Vion-interfering" basis. Non-Super fund analyses are provided by the
CLP through use of an accounting system whereby analytical costs
are charged back to the requestor. Non-Superfund clients currently
include other government agencies and other EPA programs, such as
Acid Rain, Solid Waste and the National Dioxin Study.
Analytical and Support Contractors
a. Contract Analytical Laboratories
The CLP*s analysis contractors come from the nationwide community
of chemical analytical laboratory facilities. To become part of the
CLP, laboratories must meet stringent requirements and standards
for equipment, personnel, laboratory practices, analytical operations,
and quality control operations. Firm, fixed-price contracts are
awarded competitively to the lowest responsive, responsible bidders
through the government's Invitation for Bid (IFB) process. Low-
priced bidders must successfully analyze performance samples and
pass a pre-award laboratory audit before a contract is awarded.
After contract award, laboratories are closely monitored to assure
compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract. Details of
pre-award and post-award evaluations are addressed in Chapter V.
b. Hazardous Substances Laboratories (HSL)
High hazard (HH) samples are processed by the program's contractor-
operated Hazardous Substances Laboratories at NEIC and EMSL/LV.
Under direction of the NPO, the HSU prepare and extract high
10
-------
CHAPTER II
DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES
12
-------
The two tables which follow outline the menu of services available under the CUP'S
RAS and SAS programs. The remainder of Chapter II describes each analytical
program in terms of:
o Sample matrices, concentration levels and volumes required.
o Compounds identified and quantified.
o Description of analytical protocols and detection limits.
o Contract quality control requirements.
o Contract deliverable requirements.
The organics and inorganics RAS sections present the caucus-revised protocols being
implemented in 1984.
The client should carefuly consider the provisions of each CLP analytical program
during the planning stages of a sampling event to determine the applicability of the
analysis to user needs.
In addition to the material included in this Guide, Regional DPOs maintain a Master
Copy notebook of each Statement of Work under which CLP RAS laboratory
contractors operate. Users are instructed to consult the Region*s Master Copy SOWs
for detailed analytical information.
-------
CHAPTER II
DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES
The Contract Laboratory Program provides standardized and specialized analytical
services to support a variety oi Superfund sampling activities, from those associated
with the smallest preliminary site investigation to those oi large-scale, complex
remedial, monitoring and enforcement actions. In response to the increasing
analytical demands of its client base, the CLP has continually expanded its analytical
capacity for standardized analyses through frequent IFB solicitations. Currently the
CLP is able to provide over 6,000 sample analyses per month through its routine and
specialized analytical services programs. The CLP will continue to adjust analytical
capabilities and capacity in response to Regional client needs.
The CLP operates five separate analytical programs:
o Organic Routine Analytical Services (RAS),
o friorganic RAS,
o Dioxin RAS,
o High Hazard (HH) Sample Preparation RAS, and
o Special Analytical Services (SAS).
Organic, inorganic and dioxin RAS program analyses are performed by a network of
laboratories operating under firm, fixed-price contracts with the EPA. The HH sample
preparation RAS program provides preparation and extraction of high concentration
samples prior to organic and inorganic compound analyses through CLP or Regional
laboratories. HH preparation services are provided through the program's contractor.
operated Hazardous Substances Laboratories at EPA* NEIC and EMSL/LV facilities.
The SAS program provides unique, non-standardized analytical services for organic and
inorganic compounds in a variety of matrices, to meet specific analytical requirements
which do not fall under RAS programs. SAS services are provided through individual
fixed-price subcontracts awarded to qualified laboratories.
-------
a
u
>
a
UJ
1^
u
^
Jg
H
T <
A Z
* <
H u
<
i
s?
u.
O
D
UJ
2
•
0
^C 4^
2 ^
CO >
< <
">
3 V
< .a
>
ji
*•*
o
1/1
JJ
"3.
S
tQ
X
UJ
Q
RAS Plus SAS Categ
: Services Available:
w*v
o
jj
"S.
£
m
"o o JC
S 2 §
o o «*
> > 0
a. o. ^
"2 "2 *
w 3 ^3
rtj ^ ^
S i s
'C i: u
« 5 'h
S •* .fl
ryi ^
< < -n
\ 1 *
i 2 |
'S _>. .2
2? "f3 «c_
<« 2 i»
u 'S
'c |j .£
& ? 2
O £ b
o o o
1
!. 1
< o* i
naround Analysis by K
: or Oioxin IFB Protoc
anic Analysis with Ad
rotocols.
a '5 2r^"
H S O 33
- y >s> i
u. £ zt 2
0 0
•-
j^«
•8
5
JU
c.
£ ^
tin 4>
u 4>
ifl 3 i
N y
59J
01
"§ <
X "^
o S
1 1
1 f
u —
'= .2
aO jj
5 '%
O 0
1 1
•game Analysis with A
rotocoL
xin Analysis with Addi
rotocoL
o £ o flu
vn £ Zn «.
< 7 < 7
«/ o «3 o
as *: a 2
o o
< 1 5 <
I/1) ^ >J •*"
^11
= •§
« 2§|
"Sljl
55 & 'S >.
t The client reque
work and for su
client must pro<
reporting deliver
services.
UJ
I
-------
2
|
S
.YTICAL !
aw
I
«
S
s
RAS
HHSampIt
Preparation
RAS
Diolin
Analysis
RAS
toorgantc
Analysis
RAS
Organic
Analysis
i
Mgh Concentration
Liquid ft Solid Samptes
1
!i
j!
jj
|
i!
i!
Medium Conk
Soil/Sedimei
il
Low ft Medium Concentration
Water ft Soil/Sediment Samptes
Sample
Matrices
Organk ft fctorgank
Waste Char acter iza lion
Tests, Upon Request
,5
§1
*1
il
•
HSL Compounds ft Library
Matches of M Highest
Compounds tin the ppb Range)
Compounds
Wentilied*
Quantified
Prep Procedure ft
Documentation Complete ft
En tracts Ready lor
Shipment to Analysis Lab
« 21 Days
«
— ~ "3 »>
* O Ji fl
E Q 5 9 5
|
S
W
ft*
i
i
Extraction In » Days
VOA Analysis m 1 Days
Data Delivery m JO Days
M
I
1
Screen ft Dilution
As Appropriate to
Prepare Sample Extracts
For Target Analysis
•»
si*
CC/MS Analysis
*CC Following So
Ei traction/Clean
a*
^
<„
S
metess A Col
Colorimetric
IS
c
CC/MS Analysis
Following Sample
Preparation/Extraction
Analytkal
Procedures
« £
|?
•
i
if
s •»
*• ta
*
C
*£.
«f J(
III
5i«
I
Matrta Spikes A Ouplicat*
Per 20 Samples or Per Case
For Each Matru A Concentration
On Per -Fraction Basis
|
o-
«
finite period of tir
£
I
Ion during
•V
i
5
1
s
V
•5
i group of samples collected at one
w
i
i
{
X
a
-------
or four 1-liter amber glass bottles, and two
-------
A. Organic Routine Analytical Services (RAS)
1. Sample Matrices, Concentration Levels and Volumes Required
The organic RAS contract methods apply to analysis of water (aqueous) and
soil/sediment samples. Samples for analysis should be tingle-phase,
homogeneous samples of a similar matrix. Sample matrices other than
water, sediment or soil are processed through the SAS program.
Organic RAS contract methods determine concentrations of organic
compounds ranging from low or environmental levels of concentration to
medium levels, where a compound may comprise as much as 15 percent oi
the total sample, at the lowest appropriate detection limits. Low level
samples are considered to be those collected off««ite, around the perimeter
of a waste site, or in areas where hazards are thought to be significantly
reduced by normal environmental processes. Medium level samples are
most often those collected on-site, in areas of moderate dilution by normal
environmental processes. Low and medium level designations are made in
the field by the sampler to determine packaging and'shipment procedures.
Low and medium level analysis designations are performed within the
laboratory to determine the appropriate analytical protocol to be used.
Samples collected on-site where high levels of contamination are suspected
(Le., drum samples) are routinely shipped to a Hazardous Substances
Laboratory for sample preparation prior to analysis. High hazard sample
preparation is discussed in Section D of this chapter. Alternatively, HH
sample preparation and analysis can be obtained through SAS as described
in Section E.
The sample volume and container types required for RAS organic analysis
vary according to the matrix and estimated concentration level of the
sample. For RAS organic analysis of a water sample estimated as low
level, one gallon sample volume is required for extractables (B/N/A), and
SO ml for volatiles (VOA). The sample should be collected In two SO-ounce
IT •»- -. in/*/.
-------
2. Compounds Identified and Quantified
The organic RAS program provides identification and quantification of EPA
Hazardous Substances List (HSUst) organic compounds in water and
soil/sediment samples. These compounds, which include priority pollutant
compounds and other organics of interest, are identified on the organic
data reporting sheets in Appendix B.
In addition, the laboratory is required to execute a maximum of 30
EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library searches for compounds not identified on
the HSL. The 10 peaks of greatest apparent concentration in the volatile
fraction and the 20 peaks in the base/neutral/acid fraction are tentatively
identified and the concentration estimated, following a visual comparison
of sample spectra with the nearest library matches. The tentative
identification of non-HSL organic compounds provides information on
potential organic contaminants outside of the analytical parameters of the
RAS program.
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements
The organic RAS program specifies contractually-required deliverables for
sample extraction, volatile analysis and data reporting. These
requirements include: completion of sample extraction within five days of
sample receipt by the laboratory, completion of volatile analysis within
seven days of sample receipt, and completion of extractable analysis and
reporting of data within 30 days of sample receipt. Laboratories are
subject to financial penalties for late delivery in meeting these deadlines
and incentives for early delivery of the final data package. Dlegible data
reports are considered unacceptable, and the laboratory is required to
resubmit readable versions of any illegible pages.
19
-------
The organic RAS data package supports independent sample data review by
the client user. Through review of data package components, the client
can determine the quality of the analytical data.
Each organic RAS data package includes the following components:
o Narrative report, describing analytical problems encountered and
internal decision tree processes applied.
o Copies of sample Traffic Reports.
o Quality control summary, containing surrogate, reagent blank and
duplicate matrix spike analyses recoveries and instrument tuning and
performance information.
o Sample data, including tabulated results of the organic HSL compounds
identified and quantified, and the tentative identification and estimated
concentration of up to 30 non-HSL organic compounds in greatest
apparent concentration, reported in ug/1 or mg/fcg.
o Raw sample analytical data, including sample chromatograms, spectra,
quantitation reports, and calculations.
o Standards data package (for each Case of samples), including chromato-
grams, spectra and data system printouts.
o QC data package, documenting instrument tuning and analytical QC
criteria.
The organic RAS deliverables index and copies of organic data reporting
sheets are contained in Appendix B.
Analytical Protocols
The standardized organic analytical methods are based on Federal Register
(FR) Methods 623, 60S, and 62* modified for CLP use in the analysis of
both water and soil samples. Analysis for the organic HSL compounds
includes a GC and GC/MS analysis to achieve the lowest appropriate
detection limits for each sample fraction.
20
-------
a. Water Method
Water samples for full organic analysis (base/neutral/acid, volatile
and pesticide/PCB compounds) are first prepared and/or solvent
extracted, resulting in three individual sample fractions: ex tractable
or semivolatile (B/N/A); volatile (VOA); and pesticide/PCB. Extracts
are cleaned up when necessary, using optional column chromato-
graphy techniques.
The identification and quantification of the organic HSL compounds
in water samples is performed by CC/MS for B/N/A and VOA
fractions, and by GC/EC for the pesticide/PCB fractions.
h addition, the 20 highest non-HSL base/neutral/acid compound
peaks and the 10 highest non-HSL volatile peaks are tentatively
identified and their concentration estimated, using a forward search
of the EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library.
b. Soil Method
Soil samples for full organic analysis (base/neutral/acid, volatile and
pesticide/PCB compounds) are prepared by sonification prior to
solvent extraction. Extracts are cleaned up using optional column
chromatography techniques when necessary.
The identification and quantification of the organic HSL compounds
in soil samples is performed by GC/MS for B/N/A and VOA fractions,
and by GC/EC for the pesticide/PCB fraction.
It addition, the 20 highest non-HSL base/neutral, acid peaks and the
10 highest non-HSL volatile peaks are tentatively identified and their
concentration estimated, using a forward search of the EPA/NIH
Mass Spectral Library.
21
-------
c. Method Detection Limits
Low level analysis method detection limits (MDLs) for water samples
are based on MDLs for each organic compound using FR Methods 62b,
625, and 60S, and are at the part-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximate
achievable MDLs for low and medium level water and soil samples
can be calculated based on the sample size and on
concentration/dilution factors.
MDLs are provided for analytical guidance, as the limits are highly
matrix dependent. Matrix interferences vary considerably depending
on the nature and homogeneity of the sample, on the interferent
contaminants which coextract from the sample, and on the sample
volume taken for analysis. The list of contract-specified MDLs for
low level water samples is included in Appendix B.
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements
The CLP quality control (QC) program for organic RAS laboratory analysis
is structured to provide consistent results of known and documented
quality. The program therefore places stringent quality control
requirements on all laboratories performing sample analyses. Sample data
packages contain documentation of a series of QC operations that allow an
*
experienced chemist to .determine the quality of the data and its
applicability to each sampling effort.' h addition, laboratory contracts
contain provisions for sample re-analysis if and when specified QC criteria
are not met by the contract laboratory. Each CLP laboratory is also
encouraged to develop additional internal QA/QC procedures.
The minimum QC requirements of the organic RAS program consist of both
an initial and ongoing demonstration of laboratory capability to generate
acceptable precision and accuracy with the contract methods in the
22
-------
•nalysis of water and soil samples. CLP contracts define extensive QC
procedures that must be performed and documented, and criteria that must
be met. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
o CC/MS instrument tunes for both volatile and temi-volatile
compound analyses.
o hitial multi-level calibration for each HSL compound.
o Continuing calibration for each HSL compound.
o Addition of surrogate compounds to each sample and blank for
determining percent recovery information,
o Duplicate matrix spike analyses.
o Reagent blank analyses.
Certain of the above-listed QC procedures demonstrate that the
instrument is operating within contract specifications. These include: a
demonstration that the two tuning compounds (DFTPP for extractables and
BFB for volatile*) meet the defined ion abundance criteria; determination
of an average response factor (R~F) based on a calibration using several
concentrations of each HSL compound that must meet a defined relative
standard deviation (RSO) and minimum RF; and, a continuing calibration at
a single concentration for each HSL compound for which specified
compounds are flagged as controls which must meet defined percent
difference (%D) from the initial RF or a new initial calibration must be
performed.
Other QC procedures are required to demonstrate the quality of the
analytical data generated. These include: addition of surrogate spikes to
all samples and blanks to monitor sample preparation and analysis and to
provide percent recovery information for each sample, so that the
suitability of the method for each sample (regardless of matrix) may be
established; analysis of duplicate matrix spiked samples to display the
23
-------
precision of the method for the particular Case and also to provide percent
recovery information for defined HSL compounds (specified matrix spikes)
as for surrogates; analysis of reagent blanks for each Case or each set of
20 samples (whichever is less) and for each matrix within a Case, to assure
that laboratory contaminants are not reflected in data results.
It is the responsibility of the contractor laboratory to document, in each
data package submitted, that both initial and ongoing instrument and
analytical QC criteria have been met. The laboratory must demonstrate
that instrument tuning and calibration criteria have been met, that
interferences from the analytical system are under control, and that
surrogate spike, matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries falling
outside contract acceptance windows are attributable to sample matrix
interferences and not to laboratory analytical errors. Any samples
analyzed when contract QC criteria have not been met are re-analyzed by
the laboratory when sufficient sample volume is available.
-------
Inorganic Routine Analytical Services (RASJ
1. Sample Matrices, Concentration Levels, Volumes Required and Preserva-
tion Techniques
The inorganic RAS contract methods apply to analysis of water and
soil/sediment samples. Samples for analysis should be single-phase, homo-
geneous samples of a similar matrix. Sample matrices other than water,
sediment or soil are processed through the SAS program.
Inorganic RAS contract methods determine concentrations of inorganic
priority pollutant (PP) constituents ranging from low or background levels
of concentration to medium levels, where a compound may comprise up to
15 percent of the total sample. Low level samples are generally those
collected off-site, around the perimeters of a waste site, or in areas where
hazards are thought to be significantly reduced by normal environmental
processes. Low level samples are estimated to contain less than 10 ppm of
the inorganic PP contaminants. Medium level samples are most often
those collected on-site, in areas of moderate dilution by normal environ-
mental processes. Medium level samples are estimated to contain concen-
trations of inorganic PP contaminants up to 15 percent Low and medium
level designations are made for sample collection volume and shipment
purposes, and for determination of appropriate analytical methods and
QA/QC requirements. Samples estimated to contain concentrations of
inorganic contaminants higher than 15 percent of the sample must be sent
to a Hazardous Substances Laboratory for sample preparation prior to
analysis. High hazard sample preparation is discussed in section D of this
chapter.
The sample volume and container types required for inorganic analysis vary
according to the matrix and estimated concentration level of the sample.
For RAS inorganic analysis of a water sample estimated as low level, one
25
-------
liter volume is required for metals analysis and one liter volume for
cyanide analysis. The sample should be collected in two I-liter polyethy-
lene bottles. For RAS inorganic analysis of a water sample estimated as
medium level, sixteen ounce volume is required for metals and sixteen
ounce volume for cyanide. The sample should be collected in two 16-
ounce glass jars. For RAS inorganic analysis of a soil sample estimated as
low or medium level, six ounce sample volume is required for both metals
and cyanide analyses. The sample should be collected in one S-ounce glass
jar.
For the inorganics RAS program only, it is recommended that a Case of
samples be collected over no more than a three-day period and samples
shipped collectively when the Case is completed.
When collecting low level water samples, a sample aliquot for cyanide
analysis must be collected separately, and different preservation
techniques applied to the metals and cyanide portions, as follows. For the
metals analysis aliquot, the sample should be filtered, then acidified to pH
<2 with HNO.. (If filtration is not possible, the sample should not be
acidified.) For the cyanide aliquot, the preservation techniques specified
in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste should be applied.
(Consult Appendix £ for complete reference.) No preservation is required
for medium level water samples or low or medium level soil samples.
•
Each medium level sample (water and soil) must be enclosed and sealed in a
metal paint can for shipment. If it is not certain whether a sample should
be categorized as low or medium concentration, volume should be collected
and the sample preserved as specified for low level samples, however
shipping procedures must be followed as designated for medium level
samples. For water samples, one field blank should be supplied for each
Case. No blanks are currently required for soil samples. No additional
volume is required for duplicate analyses of either water or soil samples.
-------
U sufficient sample volume is not provided, analysis of all required
parameters and/or complete QA/QC determination may not be possible. If
this occurs, SMO will contact the RSCC to determine appropriate adjust-
ments in analysis.
Required sample volume and container types for inorganic RAS analysis oi
water and soil samples are illustrated in Appendix C. Pre-cleaned sample
bottles are available through the Sample Bottle Repository, as detailed in
Chapter IV.
2. Constituents Identified and Quantified
The inorganic RAS program provides identification and quantification of
metals and cyanide in water and soil/sediment samples. These compounds
are listed on the inorganic data reporting form included in Appendix 5.
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements
The inorganic RAS program specifies contractually-required deliverables
for completion of metals and cyanide analysis and submission of the final
data package within 30 days of sample receipt at the laboratory. Labora-
tories are subject to financial penalties for late delivery and incentives for
early delivery of the final data package. Illegible data reports are
•
considered unacceptable and the laboratory is required to resubmit
readable versions of any illegible pages.
The inorganic RAS data package supports independent sample data review
by the client user. Through review of data package components, the client
can determine the quality of the analytical data.
Each inorganic RAS data package includes the following components:
o Cover sheet, listing the samples included in the report and narrative
comments describing problems encountered in analysis.
o Tabulated results of inorganic compounds identified and quantified,
reported in ug/1 or mgAg.
27
-------
o Analytical results for QC spikes, duplicates, standards, preparation
blanks calibration verification and interference checks,
o Tabulation of instrument detection limits determined in pure water
solutions.
o Raw data system printouts, identifying calibration standards, calibra-
tion blanks, preparation blanks, samples and any atypical dilution,
duplicates, spikes, interference checks and any instrument adjustments
or apparent anomalies on the measurement record.
A summary of RAS inorganic contract deliverables and copies of data
reporting forms are contained in Appendix B.
Analytical Protocols
The standardized inorganic analytical methods are based on Federal
Register (FR) methods, EPA Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastes (MCAWW), and Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-8^6),
for the analysis of water and soil samples. Analysis for specified metals
and cyanide is performed by flame, furnace and cold vapor atomic
absorption (AA), colorimetric, distillation, and inductively coupled argon
plasma (ICP) methods.
a. Water Method
Water samples for metals analysis are prepared, acid digested and the
digestate filtered to remove insoluble materials prior to analysis.
Samples are analyzed by AA or ICP methods, and dilutions are
performed where any analyte concentration exceeds the calibrated
range.
For water samples, a quantitative determination for cyanide is made
by midi-distillation and automated colorimetric analysis by MCAWW
Method 335.2.
28
-------
b. Soil/Sediment Method
Soil samples for metah analysis are prepared and acid digested and
the digestate filtered to remove insoluble materials prior to analysis.
Samples are analyzed by AA or ICP methods, and dilutions are
performed where any analyte concentration exceeds the calibrated
range.
For soil samples, a quantitative determination for cyanide is made by
midi-distillation and automated colorimetric analysis by MCAWW
Method 335.2.
c. Detection Limits
The detection limits listed on the inorganic data sheets (see Appendix
B) are based on analysis of analytes in pure water. Detection limits
for the sample analyses will be higher, depending on the sample
matrix.
Detection limits for low level water samples can be achieved in the
part-per-billion (ppb) to low part-per-million (ppm) range; detection
limits for medium water and soil samples can be achieved in the low-
ppm to mid-ppm range. Detection limits are significantly affected
by matrix interferences and other sample parameters that vary
considerably depending on the nature and homogeneity of the sample,
interferent contaminants that coextract from the sample, and
analytical method. Lowest detection limits are achieved on low level
water samples in the ppb range, where sample matrix interferences
are minimaL
-------
Exhibit C of the Statement of Work of inorganics IFB contracts
contains minimum contract-required instrument detection levels
(IDLs) that must be met by all laboratories for each of the metals and
cyanide in pure water.
Extrapolations from the "pure water" IDLs must be made to estimate
the detection limits for low and medium water and soil samples, since
the detection levels achievable for these samples will be highly
dependent on the inorganic species and matrix of each sample.
Although data is reported down to the "pure water" IDL, results
below the contract-required detection levels should be used with
caution.
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements
The CLP quality control (QO program for inorganic RAS laboratory
analysis is structured to provide consistent results of known and
documented quality. The program therefore places stringent quality
control requirements on all laboratories performing sample analysis.
Sample data packages contain documentation of a series of QC operations
that allow an experienced chemist to determine the quality of the data and
its applicability to each investigation, ti addition, laboratory contracts
contain provisions for sample re-analysis if and when specified QC criteria
are not met by the contract laboratory. Each CLP laboratory is also
encouraged to develop additional internal QA/QC procedures.
The minimum QC requirements of the inorganic RAS program consist of
both an initial and ongoing demonstration of laboratory capability to
generate acceptable precision and accuracy with the contract methods in
the analysis of water and soil samples. CLP contracts define extensive QA
30
-------
procedures that must be performed and documented, and criteria that must
be met. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
o tutial calibration and calibration verification.
o Continuing calibration verification.
o ICP interference check sample analysis.
o Preparation blank analysis.
o Matrix spike analysis.
o Duplicate sample analysis.
o Laboratory control sample analysis.
The instrument QC operations include initial and continuing calibration
checks, which are performed daily and/or every ten samples. These checks
determine that the analytical system is meeting contract-required
criteria.
Analytical QC operations include: ICP interference check sample, prepara-
tion blank, spiked sample, and duplicate sample analyses. ICP interference
check sample analyses are performed at least twice per eight-hour shift, to
verify inter element and background correction factors. Preparation blank
analyses are performed for each batch of samples or for each set of 20
samples, to ascertain whether sample concentrations reflect contamina-
tion. Spiked sample analyses and duplicate sample analyses are performed
for each matrix wjthin a Case of samples or for each set of 20 samples of a
similar matrix within a Case, to provide information concerning sample
homogeneity, analytical precision and accuracy, the effect of the sample
matrix on the analytical methodology, and to enable the Agency to
evaluate the long-term precision of the method. The laboratory control
sample is a standard carried through sample preparation and analysis
procedures to document the performance of the entire sample process.
-------
It is the responsibility of the contractor laboratory to document, in each
data package submitted, that both initial and ongoing instrument and
analytical QC criteria have been met. The laboratory must demonstrate
that instrument calibration criteria have been met, that interferences from
the analytical system are under control, and that spike recoveries falling
outside contract acceptance .windows are attributable to sample matrix
interferences and not to laboratory analytical errors. Any samples
analyzed when contract QC criteria have not been met are re-analyzed by
the laboratory.
32
-------
C. Dioxin Routine Analytical Services (RAS)
1. Sample Matrix and Volume Required
The dioxin RAS contract method applies to analysis of soil/sediment
samples only. Samples for analysis should be single-phase, homogeneous
soil/sediment samples of a similar matrix. Sample matrices other than soil
or sediment are processed through the SAS program.
The dioxin RAS contract method determines the presence of the 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin isomer in soil/sediment samples. No concen-
tration levels are designated in the dioxin program. All samples suspected
to contain dioxin are considered hazardous and handled accordingly.
The sample volume required to perform RAS dioxin analysis is four ounces
of soil or sediment. Each sample should be collected in one
-------
Required sample volume and container types for dioxin RAS analysis of
soil/sediment samples are illustrated in Appendix C. Pre-cleaned sample
bottles are available through the Sample Bottle Repository, as detailed in
Chapter IV.
2. Isomer Identified and Quantified
The dioxin RAS program identifies and quantifies the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodi-
benzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) isomer of dioxin in soil/sediment samples,
3. Contract Deliverable Requirements
The dioxin RAS program specifies: completion of sample extraction,
analysis, and data reporting within 15 or 30 days (as specified by the client)
following sample receipt at the laboratory; and automatic re-extraction
and/or additional cleanup and re-analysis of samples where certain criteria
are not met in the initial analysis, reported within 10 days of the initial
data due date. Laboratories are subject to financial penalties for late
delivery and incentives for early delivery of the data package. Illegible
data reports are considered unacceptable, and the laboratory is required to
resubmit readable versions of the illegible pages.
The dioxin RAS data package supports independent sample data review by
the client user. Through review of data package components, the client
can determine the quality of the analytical data,
Each dioxin RAS data package includes the following components:
o Completed data reporting sheets with appropriate selected ion current
profiles (SICPs) and spectra attached, indicating instrumental (GC/MS)
operating parameters during data acquisition and including all rejected
sample runs.
-------
Results of analyses of multi-level concentration calibration solutions,
including SICPs, calculated response factors, plotted concentration
calibration curves, and computer-generated quantitation reports.
SICPs generated during each performance check solution analysis and
each concentration calibration solution analysis.
Documentation of acceptable MS calibration for each confirmatory
analysis.
Chronological list of all analyses performed including labeled peaks for
TCOO isomers and partial scan confirmation spectra.
A summary of RAS dioxin data deliverables and copies of data reporting
forms are contained in Appendix B.
Analytical Protocols
a. Soil/Sediment Method
The standardized dioxin analysis contracts utilize EPA-developed
analytical methods for the analysis of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in soil/sediment
samples. Analyses are performed on a "batch" basis. A sample batch
consists of a shipment of 2* or fewer field samples, and normally
includes an equipment rinse solvent (rinsate) sample, one or more
field blanks, and a QA or PE sample.
Prior to analysis, samples are prepared, homogenized and centrifuged
when necessary. Samples are then solvent extracted with continuous
agitation. Column chromatographic and other cleanup procedures are
applied as necessary to eliminate sample components that may
interfere with detection and quantification of the 2*,3,7,&-TCDD
isomer.
-------
The concentrated extract is analyzed by GC/MS using fused silica
capillary column (FSCC) techniques. The identification and quantif-
ication of 2,3,7,8-TCDD is performed using selected ion monitoring
(SIM) GC/MS instrumentation and data systems with the capability to
acquire, store and retrieve SIM data for six ions.
b. Method Detection Limits
The RAS contract method provides procedures for the detection and
measurement of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in soil/sediment samples at concentra-
tions as low as I ug/kg (equivalent to I ppb). Column chromato-
graphy and other cleanup procedures are used to eliminate
coextracted sample components, such as PCBs, which may interfere
with the detection of very low levels of TCDD. Matrix interferences
can also occur, depending on the nature and homogeneity of the
sample, and the lowest MDL may not always be achieved.
5. Contract Quality Control Requirements
The CLP quality control (QC) program for dioxin RAS analysis is structured
to provide consistent, accurate and dependable results of known and
documented quality. The program therefore places stringent quality
• control requirements on all laboratories performing sample analysis.
Sample data packages contain documentation of a series of QC operations
that allow an experienced chemist to determine the quality of the data and
its applicability to each investigation. Each CLP laboratory is also
encouraged to develop additional internal QA/QC procedures.
The minimum QC requirements of the dioxin RAS program consist of both
initial and ongoing demonstration of laboratory capability to generate
acceptable precision and accuracy within the contract methods for the
analysis of soil/sediment samples for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. CLP contracts define
36
-------
extensive QC procedures that must be performed and documented, and
criteria that must be met. These include, but are not limited to, the
following:
o Initial and continuing calibration and instrument performance checks.
o Reagent blank analysis.
o Field blank analysis.
o Native matrix spike analysis (spiked field blank).
o Rinsate (equipment solvent) sample analysis.
o Duplicate sample analysis.
o Confirmatory partial scan analysis.
o Re-analyses, including re-extraction and/or additional cleanup of the
sample extract, when QC criteria are not met in the initial analysis.
The instrument QC operations include initial and continual calibration and
instrument performance cheks. These checks are performed at least twice
during each 8-hour shift to demonstrate continued acceptable GC/M5
resolution, sensitivity, response factor reproducability, and mass range
calibration, and to validate sample data.
Analytical QC operations include: reagent blank, field blank, spiked field
blank, rinsate, duplicate sample and confirmatory partial scan analyses.
Reagent blank analyses are performed by the laboratory prior to and during
analysis of each batch, to demonstrate that identified compound concen-
trations do not reflect laboratory contamination. Field blank analyses are
performed on one fortified (native matrix spike) and other unfortified
samples of uncontaminated soil/sediment included in each batch of
samples, to provide information on false-positive results, on the matrix
effect of the sample on the analytical methodology, and on the accuracy of
the method. Rinsate sample analysis is routinely performed for each batch
of samples to assure that samples have not been contaminated by sampling
equipment. Duplicate sample analysis is performed on one sample of each
batch to determine precision of the method. Confirmatory partial scan
37
-------
analysis is performed on the sample extract from each batch containing the
highest concentration of unlabeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD, to confirm identification
of the 2,3,7,8-TCDD isomer.
When certain conditions are not met in the initial sample analysis, the
laboratory is required by contract to re-extract the sample and/or perform
additional sample cleanup, and re-analyze the sample. Specific require-
ments for automatic sample reruns are delineated in Exhibit C of the IFB
Statement of Work.
It is the responsibility of the contractor laboratory to document, in each
data package submitted, that both initial and ongoing instrument and
analytical QC criteria have been met. The laboratory must demonstrate
that instrument tuning and calibration criteria have been met, that
interferences from the analytical system are under control, and that spike
and duplicate recoveries falling outside contract acceptance windows are
attributable to sample matrix interferences and not to laboratory
analytical errors. Samples analyzed when contract QC criteria have not
been met are re-analyzed by the laboratory. (Consult the dioxin IPS
Statement of Work, Exhibit C, for detailed re-analysis requirements.)
-------
IX High Hazard Sample Preparation (RAS)
The high hazard (HH) sample preparation RAS program processes high
concentration liquid and solid samples for analysis by CLP organic and inorganic
laboratories or EPA Regional laboratories, h this program, samples are shipped
directly to one of the program's Hazardous Substances Laboratories (HSU),
either the Regulated Substances Laboratory (RSL) at NEIC or the Containment
Facility (CF) at EMSL/LV, for preparation. The client must specify the analysis
to be performed at the time HH sample preparation is scheduled to ensure that
the sample extracts are prepared in a manner to be compatible with the
analytical procedures available through the CLP or the methods to be used by
the Regional laboratory. HH sample analysis and HH sample preparation
services can be obtained through Special Analytical Services, as described in
Section E, following.
1. Sample Matrix, Concentration Level and Volume Required
High hazard (HH) sample preparation RAS methods prepare high
concentration liquid and solid samples for analysis of organic and inorganic
compounds, and may include performance of specified characterization
tests as requested by the client. High concentration samples include
samples collected from drums, surface impoundments, direct discharges
and chemical spills, where there is little or no evidence of environmental
dilution. HH samples are suspected to contain greater than 15 percent
concentration of any individual chemical contaminant.
The sample volume required for HH organic and inorganic preparation for
analysis is six ounces for either a liquid or solid sample. Each sample
should be collected in one 8-ounce clear glass jar, filled one-ha If to three-
fourths full. Each HH sample must be enclosed and sealed in a metal paint
can for shipment. The six ounce volume of sample is sufficient for all
-------
organic and inorganic preparations and characterization tests. Collection
of additional volume is strongly discouraged due to the hazardous nature
and difficulty of disposing of HH waste.
Required sample volume and container types for high concentration
samples are illustrated in Appendix C. Pre-cleaned sample bottles are
available through the Sample Bottle Repository, as detailed in Chapter IV.
2. Preparation Procedures
a. Organic Preparation
Liquid organic samples are solvent extracted and solid organic
samples are extracted with deionized, distilled water prior to
screening by GC/FID and dilution where necessary. Samples are
prepared for organic analysis of RAS Hazardous Substances List
compounds. Upon request, samples may be characterized by testing
for pH, acidity /alkalinity, conductivity, ignitability /flash point,
oxidants, percent moisture, and percent insoluble residue. The HSL
creates reagent blank, spike, and replicate spike QC samples for each
Case to accompany the organic extracts to the analytical laboratory.
b. Inorganic Preparation
Liquid and solid inorganic samples are prepared by KOH fusion,
extraction, or acid digestion procedures, prior to screening by X-ray/
infrared techniques and dilution when necessary. Samples are
prepared for analysis of priority pollutant metals (including total
mercury). Upon request, samples may be tested for pH, conductivity,
ignitability/flash point, percent moisture, percent insoluble residue,
strong acid anions, and EP Toxicity. The HSL creates reagent blank,
spike, replicate spike and control QC samples for each Case to
accompany the inorganic extracts to the analytical laboratory.
-------
E. Special Analytical Services (SAS)
In addition to the standardized analyses provided under the Routine Analytical
Services (RAS) program, the CLP* Special Analytical Services (SAS) program
provides limited customized or specialized analyses, different from or beyond
the scope of the RAS IFB contract protocols but consistent with program
objectives. Services provided through SAS include: quick turnaround analyses,
verification analyses, analyses requiring lower detection limits than RAS
methods provide, identification and quantification of non-priority pollutant and
non-HSL constituents, general waste characterizations, analysis of non-standard
matrices, and other specific analyses.
SAS functions as an extension of the RAS program, matching unique client needs
with individual laboratory resources to accommodate varied analytical requests,
often in a short or emergency timeframe. Individual SAS subcontracts are
solicited, awarded and administered by Viar and Company, as part of the
company's contract with the EPA for operation of the Sample Management
Office (SMO). The SAS mechanism, by utilizing the subcontracting process,
allows the CLP to procure specialized services in a timely manner, on an as-
needed basis. The flexibility of the SAS program expands the CLP"s capabilities
from standardized RAS organic, inorganic and dioxin contract analyses, to
include a wide variety of additional, non-routine analytical services.
SMO procures SAS services by subcontracting with CLP RAS laboratories or
with other laboratories which have demonstrated the ability to meet program
performance requirements, when RAS laboratories cannot meet the analytical
requirement of the SAS RAS contract laboratories are evaluated for current
performance before they are considered for SAS solicitations, and are not
solicited for SAS work if deficient in this area. SAS organic, inorganic and
dioxin analysis requests are solicited to CLP laboratories with IFB contracts in
the appropriate analytical program, and that are performing in accordance with
all contractual requirements. Other laboratories qualify to perform certain
types of SAS work by successful completion of performance evaluation sample
analyses or by justification of unique analytical capability (e.g., Ames testing).
-------
3. Sample Preparation Deliverable*
The HSU routinely perform sample preparation and designated waste
characterization tests within 21 days of sample receipt, and ship sample
extracts to designated analysis laboratories. Turnaround time for
preparation may be shortened or lengthened depending on the size of the
project, the complexity of the parameters requested, and current HSL
<
sample loading and instrument conditions. Sample preparation documenta-
tion prepared by the HSL accompanies the sample extracts to the
designated analysis laboratory and is included as part of the final organic
or inorganic analytical data package.
*• Potential Follow-Up Analyses
Following organic and inorganic sample preparation, sample extracts are
shipped by the HSL to a previously designated CLP, Regional or other
analysis laboratory. Shipments of extracts are accompanied by chain-of-
custody forms, sample tracking documentation,* sample preparation and
screening documentation, and HSL-prepared QC samples.
Potential follow-up analyses include organic analysis of HSL compounds,
inorganic analysis of PP metals and cyanide, EP Toxicity testing, and other
specified parameters. CLP analysis of HH organic and inorganic samples is
provided through the SAS program, as described in Section E, following.
-------
1. SAS Services
a. RAS Plus SAS
(1) Fast Turnaround
A fast turnaround request is defined as a request for routine
(RAS) analyses with analysis or data delivery requirements
which call for performance or delivery in a shorter timeframe
than the RAS contracts provide. Fast turnaround requests
require application of existing RAS analytical parameters,
methodologies and detection limits, altering only the time
required for performance of analysis and/or delivery of data.
For information on performance/delivery requirements for RAS
organics, inorganics and dioxin IFBs, reference Part 3 of
Sections A - C of this chapter.
In responding to fast turnaround requests, SAS procurement is
limited by and dependent upon program sample load, laboratory
capacities and laboratory operating conditions at the time of
the request. Because of constant fluctuations in these factors,
it is not possible to obtain fast turnaround service on an
unlimited basis. Therefore, fast turnaround contracts are
solicited only in situations of demonstrated need, and are used
primarily to support EPA emergency actions and to meet
impending litigation deadlines.
-------
Once the laboratory universe is determined, SMO initiates solicitation via
telephone, contacting a minimum of three laboratories (contingent upon
availability of a particular analytical service) and describing the requirement.
Laboratories are asked to bid firm, fixed price(s) for the performance oi specific
types of analyses on a defined number of samples. Laboratory bids are evaluated
by SMO in terms of bid price and responsiveness to the specified task. The SAS
award is made to the lowest bidding laboratory which responds to the program's
analytical requirement. A written, individual SAS subcontract agreement is then
made between the laboratory and Viar and Company, the SMO contractor, for
laboratory performance of specified analytical work.
A laboratory* ability to bid for SAS work and bid prices vary depending on: the
size or scope of the analytical request; data turnaround requirements and
analytical parameters of a particular task; weekly RAS sample loading; and,
laboratory operating conditions at the time of solicitation. Due to the
fluctuation of these factors on a weekly, and often daily basis, the CLP cannot
accommodate all SAS requests received. Currently, SAS services are provided
on a first-come basis; however, Agency requirements can necessitate that
certain work be given priority. In this event, SMO notifies the involved RSCC
Primary Authorized Requestors, who determine Regional sampling priorities.
An analysis request can be processed through SAS only if the types of samples to
be analyzed or the analysis requirements are different than those of the RAS
program. (Consult earlier sections of this chapter for RAS sample types and
analysis requirements.) SAS requests are separated into two basic categories:
"RAS Plus SAS" and "Ail SAS". These categories are utilized in defining client
requests and pursuant SAS solicitation and award. Analytical services available
through the SAS program are described in the following sections.
Pre-cleaned sample bottles are available through the Sample Bottle Repository,
as detailed in Chapter IV. fri this program, bottles are prepared specifically for
RAS analytical work. However, bottles may be utilized in SAS projects as
appropriate.
-------
Dioxin — Special Requirements in Addition to RAS
A client may need to access the standardized dioxin RAS
program and add to the contract requirements. Any addition to
the standard dioxin analysis requirements constitutes this type
of SAS request. The following examples illustrate "RAS Plus
SAS" dioxin requests, with the SAS portion shown underlined:
o 2,3,7,8-TCDD analysis of soil/sediment samples with a
detection limit lower than 1 ppb.
o 2,3,7,8-TCDD analysis plus analysis of other dioxin isomers
or furans.
b. All SAS
CLP clients frequently request types of analyses that are outside the
scope of or not directly applicable to the RAS program. This occurs
most often with samples of difficult or unusual matrices and requests
to measure analytical parameters not provided through the RAS
program. In these situations, requests are met through a second SAS
contracting process referred to as "All SAS" Five categories of "All
SAS" requests are described in the following sections.
(1) Organic — Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS
o Seven HSUst' PCB arochlors analysis only (with or without
method substitutions).
o Specific pesticides/herbicides analysis only.
o Organic analysis on non-aqueous and non-soil/sediment
samples (e.g., oil, tar or biological tissue).
o Organic analysis by non-RAS methods.
-------
(2) Organic - Special Requirements in Addition to RAS
A common client request is to access the standardized or RAS
organic program and add to the contract requirements. Any
addition to the standard RAS Hazardous Substances List
(HSList) organic analysis requirements constitutes this type of
SAS request. The following examples illustrate common "RAS
Plus SAS" organic requests, with the SAS portion shown
underlined:
o HSList B/N/A compound analysis at low detection limits.
o HSList full organic analysis with additional non-HSList
pesticide/herbicide compounds.
o HSUst pesticide compound analyses with additional cleanup.
(3) Inorganic - Special Requirements in Addition to RAS
As with organics, it is common for a client to request the
standardized inorganic RAS program and add to the contract
requirements. Any addition to the standard RAS inorganic
analysis requirements constitutes this type of SAS request. The
following examples illustrate common "RAS Plus SAS" inorganic
requests, with the SAS portion shown underlined.
o Metals and cyanide analyses plus nitrate, sulfate, ammonia,
sulfide, total organic carbon and chloride.
o Metals and cyanide analyses with sample filtration and
preservation.
o Metals and cyanide analyses with sample homogenization.
o Metals analysis at low detection limits.
-------
(5) Special Topics Analysis
The SAS program can also accommodate unusual analytical
requests on an "Ail SAS" basis, when sufficient lead time is
allowed and complete methodology accompanies the request.
These types of analyses include, but are not limited to:
o Biological samples (e.g., fish, turtle tissue) for specific
organic, Inorganic or dioxin analyses.
o Air samples (e.g., tenax, charcoal and flurosil tubes) for
specific organic analyses.
o Wipe samples for specific organic or inorganic analyses.
o Methods comparison studies.
o Asbestos analysis.
o Non-Superfund analytical services of any type.
o Acid deposition parameters.
2. Contract Deliverable Requirements
SAS contracts specify required delivery schedules for sample extraction,
analysis and data reporting, as defined by the client requestor. Deliverable
requirements for "RAS Plus SAS" and "All SAS" requests are per RAS
contract deliverable requirements, as applicable, unless otherwise specified
by the client at the time of request.
3. Contract Quality Control Requirements
SAS contracts require laboratory performance of QC procedures and
reporting of QC parameters, as defined by the client requestor. QC
requirements are as specified in RAS program contracts, as applicable,
unless otherwise specified by the client at the time of request. Clients are
encouraged to maintain a high level of QC in all analysis requests, unless
there is substantial reason for deleting certain QC requirements.
-------
(2) Inorganic - Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS
o Specified elements from the RAS program metals (e.g.,
cadmium, mercury and selenium only).
o Total organic carbon (TOO analysis only (on water or
soil/sediment samples).
o EP Toxicity tests (metals, pesticides or herbicides).
o Any inorganic analysis on non-aqueous and non-soil/sediment
samples (e.g., oil, tar or biological tissue).
o Metals analysis by non-RAS methods.
(3) Dioxin — Special Requirements Not Provided by RAS
o 2,3,7,8-TCDD in water or fish tissue.
o 2,3,7,8-TCDF (furan) in any matrix.
o Total tetra through octa dioxin and/or furan classes in
varied matrices.
o Analysis by HRGC/HRMS or GC/MS/MS.
(4) High Hazard Sample Analysis — Organic and Inorganic
The SAS program provides for analysis of High Hazard (HH)
sample extracts prepared by the Hazardous Substances
Laboratories. HH analysis services are described below.
o Organic analysis for HSList compounds by GC/MS and
GC/ECD with tentative identification of 30 non-HSList
compounds of greatest concentration.
o Inorganic analysis for KOH fusion total metals and total
mercury.
-------
CHAPTER m
UTILIZATION OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES
-------
A. Regional Allocation System
An allocation system has been established to equitably apportion available
laboratory space to the Regions during periods of heavy sampling activity when
analysis capacity for all requests may not be available. When in effect, all
organic* RAS and RAS plus SAS Cases are scheduled under the allocation system.
By the first day of each month, the NPO provides the RSCC with the Region's
monthly allocation of organic sample analyses. The RSCC is responsible for
planning the month's sampling activities in accordance with the NPO allocation.
Up to the second Thursday in the month, the RSCC requests sample analyses for
all planned Regional sampling activities for that month, assigning a priority to
each activity requested. (Analysis request procedures are delineated in the following
sections of this chapter.) In follow-up, the RSCC submits to SMO confirmation of
verbal requests for sample analyses for the month, using the form entitled,
"Planned Sampling Activity Requiring CLP Analyses." An example of this form is
included in Appendix C Copies are available from SMO.
Upon receiving the Region's sampling requests, SMO makes laboratory
assignments for the month, scheduling requests received up to each
Region's allocation limit. Requests for space in excess of the monthly allocation
will not be processed by SMO until requests from all Regions which fall within
allocations have been placed at a laboratory. At this time, any "excess"
laboratory capacity for the month is determined. The NPO then prioritizes
Regional sampling requests which exceed allocations, on a national basis.
Following NPO prioritization, SMO makes laboratory assignments for sampling
activities as prioritized by the NPO, utilizing available laboratory capacity.
For additional information concerning the allocation system, contact SMO* Group
Leader for Analytical Services (see Appendix A).
51
-------
CHAPTER HI
UTILIZATION OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES
The CLP provides clients with prompt access to laboratory services through a
documented system of sample scheduling and coordination in which the client plays a
key role. The purpose of this chapter is to familiarize clients with the proper use of
program services. Specific procedures and required documentation are reviewed for
each program, providing complete step-by-step information on how to properly access
the program's analytical resources.
CLP procedures are based on two fundamental requirements: (1) the maintenance of
ongoing communication among Regional Sample Control Center (RSCC), field sampler,
SMO and laboratory personnel; and, (2) the correct use of sample scheduling and
tracking documents by RSCC, field sampler and laboratory personnel. The Sample
Management Office (SMO) provides centralized direction and coordination in
scheduling sample analyses through the CLP, and tracks the progress of samples from
the point of collection through final data production. To effectively match the
analytical needs of program clients with the capabilities of appropriate contractor
laboratories, SMO maintains ongoing records which document for each
program: current utilization, availability of resources, and laboratory performance
limitations.
SMO is authorized to accept analytical requests only through the RSCC, centered in
the Region's Environmental Services Division. The RSCC, established by the EPA
Regional Administrator, is responsible for defining the Region's analytical priorities
and placing analytical requests for CLP services through SMO. The RSCC consists of
three or more identified Authorized Requestors (AR), who routinely place analytical
requests through SMO and coordinate with SMO throughout sample shipment and
analysis. The RSCC is responsible for ensuring Regional compliance with the CLP's
allocation system, as described in the following section. The Primary AR determines
analytical priorities for the Region when conflicts occur.
hdividuals interested in obtaining CLP analytical support are instructed to contact
their Regional EPA office's Regional Sample Control Center (see Appendix A).
50
-------
B. Analysis Vitiation/Request Procedures
1. RAS Initiation Process
a. User Information Required
To initiate a RAS request, the RSCC Authorized Requestor contacts
the appropriate SMO Controller by telephone and provides a complete
description of the analytical requirement. (SMO personnel are
identified in the CLP Directory, Appendix A.)
SMO requires the following information to initiate a RAS request:
o Name of RSCC Authorized Requestor
o Name(s), association, and telephone number(s) of
sampling personnel.
o Name and location of the site to be sampled.
o Number and matrix of samples to be collected.
o Type of analyses required; i.e., organics, inorganics,
dioxin.
o Cyanide analysis requirement (inorganics only).
o Scheduled sample collection and shipment dates.
o Nature of sampling event (i.e., investigation, monitoring,
enforcement, remedial, drilling project).
o Other pertinent information which may effect sample
scheduling or shipment (Le., anticipated delays due
to site access, weather conditions, sampling equipment).
o Name(s) of Regional or contractor contacts for
immediate problem resolution.
The Authorized Requestor is responsible for applying professional
judgment in accurately estimating the numbers and types of samples
and the sample shipment dates of the analytical request.
52
-------
Overestimation of the number of samples to be collected and/or
miscalculation of shipment dates unnecessarily ties up available
laboratory capacity, preventing the efficient management of CLP
analytical resources and rendering the program less than maximally
responsive to all clients. Underestimation of the numbers and types
of samples to be collected may mean that adequate services will not
be available for any additional analyses needed.
b. Lead Time Requirement
When planning for a sampling activity has been completed and at
least one week prior to the scheduled start of sampling, the AR
telephones SMO and places the specific request for RAS services. A
minimum of one week lead time is essential to facilitate laboratory
scheduling and resolution of questions concerning sampling and
analysis procedures, and to allow the sampler adequate time to
prepare the required sample documentation. Advance scheduling is
available through the Regional Allocation System and should be
utilized whenever possible.
c. Case Number Assignment and Laboratory Scheduling
At the time of request, SMO assigns a sequential Case number to
each individual RAS sampling activity. The RSCC records the Case
number and uses it in referencing that request throughout sampling
and analysis. A Case number designates a single group of samples
collected at one site or geographical location during a predetermined
and finite time period and is used to identify a particular RAS
sampling event throughout sample tracking and data production.
SMO then schedules the requested analyses through an appropriate
RAS laboratory. This selection is determined by the types of
analyses, number of samples, program contract capacity, sample
53
-------
balance among the various laboratories, and laboratory loading and
instrument conditions. When possible, the nearest available labora-
tory is assigned to minimize sample shipping costs.
Once RAS laboratory assignments are made, SMO contacts the AR to
confirm the field investigation plans, identify the laboratories to be
used for the Case, and answer any further questions the sampler may
have regarding program procedures or documentation. At that point,
the AR must indicate all known or anticipated sample scheduling
changes. Any other changes occurring after this time should be
communicated to SMO immediately upon identification to ensure the
timely resolution of conflicts and the optimal allocation of program
resources.
After the initial placement of the RAS request, the RSCC may
choose to assign a logistical contact, such as the team leader in the
sampling effort, to follow up with SMO in finalizing sampling
requirements, initiating changes, and coordinating sample shipment.
d. User Knowledge of Analytical Protocols
It is the responsibility of each RSCC Authorized Requestor to acquire
and maintain a working knowledge of current RAS protocols and
analytical services. SMO provides each Region with Master Copy
notebooks of each RAS program IFB Statement of Work (SOW), which
are periodically updated to reflect program protocol changes. The
SOW represents the standardized requirements which each individual
RAS laboratory is contractually bound to follow. Regional DPOs (see
Appendix A) maintain the Region's Master Copy SOW notebooks.
The analytical SOWs contain specific information on sample types
suited to RAS analysis, compounds identified and quantified, analy-
tical methods, protocols, detection limits, deliverable requirements,
-------
and quality control requirements. In addition to the summary
information contained in this User's Guide, the RAS Statement of
Work should be consulted by program users to confirm that the RAS
program is suited to an analytical request. Analytical requirements
differing from RAS parameters are processed through the SAS
program, as described in Section E, Chapter IL
2. SAS Initiation Process
User Information Required
To initiate a SAS request, the RSCC Authorized Requestor contacts
the appropriate SMO Controller by telephone and provides a complete
.description of the analytical requirement. (SMO personnel are
identified in the CLP Directory, Appendix A.)
SMO requires the following information to initiate a SAS request:
o Name of RSCC Authorized Requestor
o Name(s), association, and telephone number(s) of
sampling personnel.
o Name and location of the site to be sampled.
o Number and matrix of samples to be collected.
o Specific analyses required and appropriate protocols.
o Required detection limits.
o Matrix spike and duplicate frequency.
o Justification for fast turnaround request, if appropriate.
o Scheduled sample collection and shipment dates.
o Nature of sampling event (Le., investigation, monitoring,
enforcement, remedial, drilling project).
o Other pertinent information which may affect sample
scheduling or shipment (i.e., anticipated delays due
to site access, weather condition, sampling equipment).
o Name(s) of Regional or contractor contacts for immediate
problem resolution.
55
-------
In follow-up to the verbal request, the AR must submit a completed
SAS Client Request form to SMO. This form serves as the written
record to clarify and confirm the client's requirement for specialized
analysis work. A copy of the SAS Client Request form is included in
Appendix C.
The Authorized Requestor is responsible for applying professional
judgment in accurately estimating the numbers and types of samples
and the sample shipment dates of the SAS request. Overestimation
of the number of samples to be collected and/or miscalculation of
shipment dates unnecessarily ties up available laboratory capacity,
preventing the efficient management of CLP analytical resources and
rendering the program less than maximally responsive to all clients.
Underestimation of the numbers and types of samples to be collected
may mean that adequate services will not be available for any
additional analyses needed. Depending on the scope of the mis-
calculation, it may require that the entire request be resolicited, and
sampling plans postponed accordingly.
b. Lead Time Requirements
When planning for a sampling activity has been completed, the AR
telephones SMO and places the specific request for SAS services.
Because SAS services are individually procured on a competitive
basis, a minimum lead time of one week is required to process a SAS
request. A two-week lead time is strongly recommended whenever
possible.
Certain types of SAS requests require a longer lead time, as follows.
A minimum lead time of two weeks is required for SAS requests
which involve distribution of protocols (reference item d., this
section). A minimum lead time of three to four weeks is required for
large-scale, analytically complex and/or non-Superfund SAS requests.
-------
The AR should consider the above-outlined criteria in determining
the lead time required to schedule a particular SAS effort. As a
general rule, due to protocol diversity and laboratory procurement
procedures, accessing SAS demands greater advance planning and
more lead time than that required for the standardized RAS
programs. The AR should contact SMO several weeks in advance, if
there is a question regarding the advance time needed to schedule a
particular SAS.
SAS Number Assignment and Laboratory Scheduling
At the time of request, SMO assigns a sequential SAS number for
each individual SAS sampling activity. If SAS services are being
provided in association with RAS services, SMO also designates the
assigned Case number. The AR records the SAS number and Case
number (if applicable) and uses these numbers in referencing the
request throughout sampling and analysis. Like the Case identifica-
tion, the SAS number designates a single group of samples collected
at one site or geographical location during a predetermined and finite
time period, and is used to identify a particular SAS sampling event
throughout sample tracking and data production.
SAS laboratory selection is based on a telephone solicitation process
for each individual request, which results in a written SAS award to
the lowest qualified bidder. Once SAS laboratory assignments are
made, SMO notifies the AR of the laboratories that will be
performing the analyses.
As indicated, the nature of the SAS laboratory solicitation process
requires the Authorized Requestor to be as exact as possible with all
elements of a request at the time of request. It is understood that
57
-------
actual site conditions can vary considerably from expected conditions
and necessitate changes in the sampling plan. However, the AR has
the responsibility to notify SMO immediately of any changes to allow
sufficient time to amend the SAS contract(s) to meet the changed
needs. If an original request is changed significantly, the original
SAS contract will be voided and the entire analysis effort will be
resolicited, requiring an additional week of time before sample
shipment can take place.
d. User-Provided Analytical Protocol
It is the responsibility of the RSCC Authorized Requestor to provide
the applicable analytical protocol and associated QG procedures to be
utilized for each SAS request. The analytical methodology and QC
requirements to be applied under a particular SAS must be provided
or referenced at the time of request.
For SAS requests that are based on the use of amended RAS protocols
the AR must specify modifications or additions to these protocols at
the time of request. If such changes are extensive, the AR must
submit changes in written form two weeks in advance of scheduled
sample shipment under the SAS. This additional lead time is required
for protocol distribution and review by solicited laboratories.
For SAS requests which require use of a non-RAS method that is not
commonly available, the AR must submit the method to SMO two
weeks in advance of sample shipment, to allow time for protocol
distribution and review by solicited laboratories.
-------
SAS requests which cite the application of well-known analytical
publications do not require additional lead time for distribution, since
laboratories have immediate access to this information. Examples of
such frequently-utilized method manuals are listed below. Additional
analytical references are supplied in Appendix E.
o Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Waste, USEPA, 1983.
o Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, SW-8^6, USEPA Office of Water and Waste Manage-
ment, 1983.
o Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water,
APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Current Edition.
The RSCC should contact SMO several weeks in advance if there is a
question as to whether a particular method will require additional
lead time for distribution.
3. Initiation of RAS High Hazard Sample Preparation
a. User Information Required
To initiate a request for routine High Hazard (HH) sample prepara-
tion, the RSCC Authorized Requestor contacts the appropriate SMO
Controller by telephone and provides a complete description of the
requirement. (SMO personnel are identified in the CLP Directory,
Appendix A.)
-------
SMO requires the following information to initiate a High Hazard
RAS request:
o Name of RSCC Authorized Requestor
o Name(s), association, and telephone number(s) of
sampling personnel
o Name and location of the site to be sampled.
o Number and matrix of samples to be collected.
o Type of preparation and analyses required.
o Scheduled sample collection and shipment dates.
o Nature of sampling event (Le., investigation, monitoring,
enforcement, remedial, drilling project).
o Suspected hazards associated with the site.
o Other pertinent information which may affect sample
scheduling or shipment (Le., anticipated delays due
to site access, weather conditions, sampling equipment).
o Name(s) of Regional or contractor contacts for
immediate problem resolution.
It is the responsibility of the RSCC Authorized Requestor to provide
information concerning the target analyses for which the samples are
being prepared and to designate the analytical facility (CLP or
Regional) that will be performing the follow-up analyses at thejirne
of request. Specific HH sample preparation procedures are then
employed by the Hazardous Substances Laboratory (HSL) to render
sample extracts compatible with the specific analytical protocols to
be used by the analysis laboratory.
If the analysis will be performed through the CLP, the AR should
schedule the HH 5AS analyses when placing the RAS HH preparation
request. (Consult part 2., preceding for applicable SAS request
procedures.) If the analysis will be performed by a non-CLP
laboratory, it is the client's responsibility to make the necessary
analytical arrangements with the selected laboratory.
60
-------
b. Lead Time Requirement
A minimum lead time of one week is required to schedule RAS HH
sample preparation. Longer lead time is required for a request
involving large numbers of samples or a long-term request.
c. SA5 Number Assignment and Laboratory Scheduling
At the time of request, SMO assigns a SAS number to the individual
sampling event and designates the HSL that will perform the sample
preparation, either the Regulated Substances Laboratory at NE1C or
the Containment Facility at EMSL/LV. (It should be noted that HH
sample preparation involves assignment of a SAS number to identify
the sampling event, rather than using a Case number as in other RAS
programs.) The AR records the assigned SAS number, and uses this
number in identifying the HH preparation request throughout sample
tracking and HSL preparation.
d. Sample Preparation and Shipment to Analysis Laboratory
Samples are sent directly to the designated HSL for sample prepara-
tion and characterization tests, if requested. Following the comple-
tion of sample preparation, the HH extracts are shipped by the HSL
to the assigned CLP or non-CLP analysis laboratory. If the analysis
is being performed by a non-CLP laboratory, the client must make
arrangements directly with the HSL for shipment of the extracts to
the appropriate analysis facility.
61
-------
Procedures for Making Changes to Analytical Requests
The RSCC Authorized Requestor is responsible for immediately notifying
the appropriate SMO Controller of all changes in sampling plans as they are
identified. This includes any changes in sample matrices, numbers of
samples, analyses requested, detection limits, shipping dates, postpone-
ments or cancellations. The RSCC Authorized Requestor must maintain
this communication at all stages of the request — before, during and after
shipment of samples to the laboratories. Likewise, the AR-designated
logistical contact must notify the appropriate SMO Controller of any
changes in sampling before and during the on-site sampling event and after
shipment of samples to laboratories.
Failure to notify SMO of such changes can result in: delay in sampling to
accommodate scheduling changes, delay in start of analysis due to
conflicts, unsuitability of a particular sample to an analytical program,
and /or analysis data inappropriate for client purposes.
62
-------
C. Sample Documentation
Each sample processed by the CLP must be properly documented to ensure
timely, correct and complete analysis for all parameters requested, and most
importantly, to support use of sample data in potential enforcement actions
concerning a site. The CLP documentation system provides the means to
individually identify, track, and monitor each sample from the point of collection
through final data reporting. As used herein, a sample is defined as a
representative specimen collected at a specific location of a waste site at a
particular point in time for a specific analysis, and may reference field samples,
duplicates, replicates, splits, spikes, or blanks, that are shipped from the field to
a laboratory. Specific CLP sample documentation requirements are described in
the following sections.
Whenever questions arise, samplers should contact SMO for direction and
clarification concerning the proper completion and distribution of Case and/or
SA5 paperwork for a sampling effort.
1. Sample Traffic Report (TR)
The sample documentation system for the RAS organic, inorganic and HH
sample preparation programs is based on the use of the sample Traffic
Report, a four-part carbonless form printed with a unique sample
identification number. One .Traffic Report and its preprinted identification
number is assigned by the sampler to each sample collected. The three
types of TRs currently in use include: Organic, friorganic and High Hazard
Traffic Reports. Copies of the three types of TRs are included in Appendix
B, along with examples of properly completed TR forms.
To provide a permanent record for each sample collected, the sampler
completes the appropriate TR, recording the Case Number, site name or
code and location, analysis laboratory, sampling office, dates of sample
63
-------
collection and shipment, and sample concentration and matrix. Numbers of
sample containers and volumes are entered by the sampler beside the
analytical parameter^) requested for particular sample portions.
After completing the TR, the sampler includes the bottom two copies in
the sample shipment to the laboratory. Following sample shipment, the
sampler returns the top copy of the completed TR to SMO. The second
copy is the sampler's file copy. Upon receipt of samples, the analysis
laboratory documents sample condition and signs the TR* returning the
signed copy to SMO and keeping a laboratory file copy. In the Organics
RAS program, copies of the laboratory-signed TRs are provided to the
RSCC as part of the data package. In the Inorganics and High Hazard RAS
programs, SMO provides copies of the TRs to the RSCC separately.
A strip of adhesive sample labels each printed with the TR sample number
come attached to the TR, for the sampler's use in labeling sample bottles.
The sampler affixes one of these numbered labels to each container making
up the sample, h order to protect the label from water and solvent attack,
each label must be covered with clear waterproof tape. The sample labels,
which bear the TR identification number, permanently identify each
sample collected and link each sample component throughout the analytical
process.
Where a RAS request is associated with an additional SAS request
(described in Chapter II as nRAS Plus SAS" request), TR forms are used for
both RAS and SAS samples. Both the RAS Case number and the SAS
number must be entered on the TR line requesting "Case Number.11 Both
numbers are required in order to clearly identify and track the sampling
event. Additionally, the sampler must document a brief description of the
SAS requirement on each TR. For example, "VOA - 1 ppb detection limit".
Traffic Report forms are provided by SMO to each Region through the
RSCC One of the RSCC ARs should contact SMO two or more weeks in
advance to order additional TRs for the Region.
-------
2. Dioxin Shipment Record (DSR)
Sample documentation for the RAS dioxin program utilizes the CLP Dioxin
Shipment Record, a four-part carbonless form. The DSR provides a
record for one shipment batch of dioxin samples (up to 24 samples).
Samples are individually numbered using the pre-printed labels provided by
SMO with the supply of DSRs, and each sample number is entered on the
DSR by the sampler. A copy of the DSR is included in Appendix C, along
with an example of a properly completed DSR form.
To provide a permanent record of each sample collected, the sampler
completes the DSR, first recording the appropriate CLP Case number and
Batch/Shipment number. Header information pertinent to all samples is
then entered, including: site name/code, tier designation, data turnaround
(15 or 30 days), sampling office, sampling contact, sampling date, date of
shipment, and analysis laboratory. Sample matrix and description
information (e.g., soil/sediment field sample, solvent rinsate) is recorded
for each sample by checking the appropriate box following each sample
number.
After completion of the DSR, the sampler includes the bottom two copies
with the sample shipment to the laboratory. Following sample shipment,
the sampler returns the top copy of the DSR to SMO. The second copy is
the sampler* file copy. Upon receipt of thei sample shipment, the
laboratory documents sample condition and signs the DSR, returning a copy
to SMO and keeping a file copy. Copies of the laboratory-signed DSRs are
provided to the RSCC as part of the data package.
As indicated, two strips of adhesive sample labels pre-printed with unique
sample numbers are provided with the DSR for the sampler's use in labeling
both the sample bottle and the outside of the paint can in which the sample
is packed. In order to protect the labels from water and solvent attack,
-------
labels on both the sample container and the paint can are covered with
clear, waterproof tape. The sample labels permanently identify each
sample collected throughout the analytical process.
Dioxin Shipment Record forms are provided by SMO to each Region
through the RSCC One of the RSCC ARs should contact SMO two or more
weeks in advance to order additional DSRs.
3. SAS Packing List (PL)
For an "All SAS" type of request (as described in Chapter 10, samplers
utilize the SAS Packing List, a four-part carbonless form. The PL
provides space to list up to 20 samples on one form. SAS samples are
numbered using the SAS number followed by a hyphen and progressive
numerical designation, starting with 1 (e.g., 800E-1, 800E-2, 800E-3, etc.)
If the sampling activity extends over several days and more than one PL is
used, care must be taken not to repeat sample numbers. A copy of the SAS
Packing List is included In Appendix C, along with an example of a properly
completed PL form.
To provide a permanent record of each sample collected, the sampler
completes the PL, recording the SAS number, site name and location,
sampling date, shipment date, analysis laboratory, sampling office, sampler
name and telephone number, individual SAS sample numbers, sample
description and analytical parameters requested.
After completing the PL, the sampler includes the bottom two copies with
the sample shipment to the analysis laboratory. Following sample
shipment, the sampler sends the top copy to SMO. The second copy is the
sampler's file copy. Upon receipt of samples, the analysis laboratory
documents sample condition and signs the PL* returning a copy to SMO and
keeping a laboratory file copy. Copies of the laboratory-signed PLs are
provided to the RSCC as part of the SAS data package.
-------
Adhesive sample labels must be provided by the sampler and marked with
the appropriate SAS sample numbers using indelible ink. Labels are
secured to each sample container, and covered with clear waterproof tape
to protect the label from water and solvent attack. The sample label
permanently identifies each sample collected and links each sample
component throughout the analytical process.
SAS Packing Lists are provided by SMO to each Region through the RSCC
One of the RSCC ARs should contact SMO two or more weeks in advance
to order additional SAS PLs,
Sample Tag
To render sample data valid for Agency enforcement uses, individual
samples must be traceable continuously from the time of collection until
the time of introduction as evidence during litigation. One mechanism
utilized in the CLP to comply with this enforcement requirement is the use
of the "sample tag". Each sample removed from a wastesite and
transferred to a laboratory for analysis is identified by a sample tag
containing specific information regarding the sample, as defined by the
EPA National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC). Following
sample analysis, sample tags are retained by the laboratory as physical
evidence of sample receipt and analysis, and may later be introduced as
evidence in Agency litigation proceedings. Sample tags can be obtained
through the Regional office.
67
-------
The information recorded on an EPA sample tag includes:
o CLP Case/SAS No(s). — The unique numbers) assigned by
SMO to identify the sampling event. (Entered under
"Remarks" heading.)
o CLP Sample No. — The unique identification number
(from the TR, DSR or PL) used to document that sample.
(Entered under "Remarks" heading.)
o Project Code — The number assigned by EPA to the
sampling project.
o Station No. — A two-digit number assigned by the
sampling team coordinator.
o Date — A six-digit number indicating the month, day and
year of collection.
o Time — A four-digit number indicating the military time
of collection.
o Station Location — The sampling station description as
specified in the project plan.
o Samplers — Signatures of samplers on the project team.
o Remarks — Case/SAS and sample numbers are entered
here, and any pertinent comments indicated.
o Tag No. — A unique serial number pre-printed or stamped
on the tag.
o Lab Sample No. — Reserved for laboratory use.
Additionally, the sample tag contains appropriate spaces for noting that
the sample has been preserved and indicating the analytical parameter(s)
for which the sample will be analyzed. An example of a properly
completed sample tag is included in Appendix C.
-------
Each sample tag is completed and securely attached to the sample
container. Samples are then shipped under chain-of-custody procedures as
described in the following section.
Chain-of-Custody Record
Official custody of samples must be maintained and documented from the
time of sample collection up to introduction as evidence in court, in
accordance with Agency enforcement requirements. The following custody
documentation procedure was developed by NEIC and is used in conjunction
with CLP sample documentation (Le., Traffic Report, Dioxin Shipment
Record and SAS Packing List) for all samples processed through the CLP.
A sample is considered to be in an individual's custody if the following
criteria are met: it is in your possession or it is in your view after being in
your possession; it was in your possession and then locked up or transferred
to a designated secure area. Under this definition, the team member
actually performing the sampling is personally responsible for the care and
custody of the samples collected until they are transferred or dispatched
properly. In follow-up, the sampling team leader reviews all field
activities to confirm that proper custody procedures were followed during
the field work.
The Chain-of-Custody Record is employed as physical evidence of sample
custody. Chain-of-Custody Record forms can be obtained through the
Regional office. The sampler completes a Chain-of-Custody Record to
accompany each sample shipment from the fieid to the laboratory.
Similar information to that entered on the sample tag is recorded on the
Chain-of-Custody Record. Header information includes the project number
and name, samplers' signatures and the CLP Case/SAS number (entered on
the upper right of the form). For each station number, the sampler
69
-------
indicates: date, time, whether the sample is a composite or grab, station
location, number of containers, analytical parameters, CLP sample
numbeKs) (from TR, DSR or PL), and sample tag number(s). When
relinquishing the samples for shipment, the sampler signs in the space
indicated at the bottom of the form, entering the date and time the
samples are relinquished. The sampler enters shipper name and airbill
number under the "Remarks" section on the bottom right of the form. An
example of a properly completed Chain-of-Custody Record is included in
Appendix C.
The custody record is completed using waterproof ink. Any corrections are
made by drawing a line through and initialing the error, then entering the
correct information. Erasures are not permissable.
The top, original signature copy of the Chain-of-Custody Record is
enclosed in plastic (with CLP sample documentation) and secured to the
inside of the cooler lid. A copy of the custody record is retained for the
sampler's files.
Shipping coolers are secured and custody seals are placed across cooler
openings (see Section C., following). As long as custody forms are sealed
inside the sample cooler and custody seals remain intact, commercial
carriers are not required to sign off on the custody form.
Whenever samples are split with a source or government agency, a separate
Chain-of-Custody Record should be prepared for those samples, indicating
with whom the samples are being split and sample tag serial numbers from
splits.
The laboratory representative who accepts the incoming sample shipment
signs and dates the Chain-of-Custody Record to acknowledge receipt of the
samples, completing the sample transfer process. It is then the
laboratory's responsibility to maintain internal log books and records that
provide a custody record throughout sample preparation and analysis.
70
-------
D. Sample Packaging and Shipment
1. Packaging Requirements
Samples processed through the CLP must be packaged for shipment in
compliance with current U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and
commercial carrier regulations. All required government and commercial
carrier shipping papers must be filled out and shipment classifications
made according to current DOT regulations. (Consult Appendix E for
shipping references.)
Traffic Reports, Dioxin Shipment Records, 5AS Packing Lasts, Chain-of-
Custody Records, and any other shipping/sample documentation
accompanying the shipment, must be enclosed in a waterproof plastic bag
and taped to the underside of the cooler lid.
Coolers must be sealed with custody seals in such a manner that the
custody seal would be broken if the cooler were opened.
Shipping coolers should have clearly visible return address labels on the
outside. Shipping coolers that are labeled in this manner will be returned
to the sampler by the laboratory within 14 days following laboratory
sample receipt.
Inside the cooler, sample containers must be enclosed in clear plastic bags
through which sample tags and labels are visible. For dioxin samples and
water and soil samples suspected to be of medium or high concentration,
each sample must be enclosed in a metal can with a clipped or scalable lid
(paint cans are normally used for this purpose) and surrounded by packing
material such as vermiculite. The outer metal can must be labeled with
the number of the sample contained inside.
71
-------
Low level water samples for organics analysis must be shipped cooled to
4°C with ice. No ice should be used in shipping: dioxin samples; inorganic
low level water samples; or, organic/inorganic medium/high level water or
soil samples. Ice is not required in shipping low level soil samples, but may
be utilized at the option of the sampler.
Low and medium level water samples for inorganic analysis require
chemical preservation (reference Chapter II, Section B, for preservation
techniques).
Waterproof, metal ice chests or coolers are the only acceptable type of
sample shipping container. Shipping containers should be packed with non-
combustible, absorbent packing material (vermiculite is recommended)
surrounding the plastic-enclosed sample bottles (or metal cans containing
samples) to avoid sample breakage in transport. Sufficient packing
material should be used so that sample containers will not make contact
during shipment. Earth or ice should never be used to pack samples. Earth
is a contaminant, and ice melts resulting in container breakage.
Unless the sampler requests otherwise through SMO in advance, the
laboratory disposes of unused sample volume, sample bottles and packing
materials 90 days following sample receipt.
A summary of correct sample packaging is illustrated in Appendix C.
2. Shipping Instructions
Samples for organics analysis must be shipped "Priority One/Overnight." If
shipment requires more than a 24-hour period, sample holding times can be
exceeded compromising the integrity of the sample analyses.
Samples for inorganics analysis should be held until sampling for the Case
is complete and shipped "Standard Air" for two-day delivery. In the RAS
inorganic program, three days is the recommended period for collection of
a Case of samples.
72
-------
All samples should be shipped through a reliable commercial carrier, such
as Federal Express, Emory, Purolator, or equivalent. Sampling offices are
responsible for sample shipping charges.
The NEIC/Denver and the ERT/Cincinnati hazardous waste site manuals
(references provided in Appendix E), provide extensive information on
EP ^-approved sample packaging and shipment techniques. In addition,
questions concerning sample packaging and shipment may be directed to
SMO.
3. Shipment Coordination
To enable SMO to track the shipment of samples from the field to the
laboratory and ensure timely laboratory receipt of samples, the sampler
must notify SMO immediately following all sample shipments. At that
time, the sampler should provide the following information:
o Sampler name
o Case Number and/or SAS Number of the project.
o Batch numbers (dioxin only)
o Exact number(s) and type(s) of samples shipped.
o Laboratory(s) samples were shipped to.
o Carrier and airbill number(s) for the shipment,
o Method of shipment (e.g., overnight, two-day)
o Date of shipment.
o Any irregularities or anticipated problems with the samples,
including special handling instructions, or deviations from
established sampling procedures.
o Status of the sampling project (e.g., final shipment, update
of future shipping schedule).
73
-------
Sample shipments made after 5:00 PM EST should be called in to SMO at
the start of business the next day (8:00 AM EST). SMO must be notified by
3:00 PM EST Friday concerning information on sample shipments going out
Friday intended for Saturday delivery/pickup. CLP laboratories remain
open to receive or pick-up Saturday shipments only upon advance notifica-
tion by SMO and only when shipment airbili numbers have been provided to
SMO by the sampler.
The success of sample shipment coordination depends on the proper use and
handling of the sample tracking forms and on timely and complete
communication among the RSCC, samplers, SMO, and laboratories. Any
postponements or cancellations, changes in the number or type of samples
to be collected or shipping dates must be communicated to SMO as soon as
this information is known, to facilitate this process. Appendix C contains a
checklist for coordinating sample shipment.
-------
D. Procedures for Problem Resolution
1. Resolving Problems Concerning Sample Shipment and Analysts
Program laboratories routinely notify SMO upon encountering problems
with sample receipt or during sample analysis. (Examples of these types of
problems are listed in Appendix C.) In response, SMO immediately
contacts the RSCC to relay the problem and to assist in formulating a
solution. SMO then contacts the laboratory involved to communicate the
recommended action and to authorize processing of the sample(s) in
question. The key to this type of problem resolution is timeliness, since
delays impact sample holding times, contractual time requirements for
sample extraction and analysis, and if extreme, could invalidate the
analyses.
General questions a user may have regarding sample shipment, sample
analyses, laboratory contracts, or the status of data deliverables on a
particular Case or SAS should be referred to the appropriate SMO
personnel. Questions of a technical nature regarding contract analytical
procedures should be referred to the appropriate NPO official or to the
appropriate Regional Deputy Project Officer through the NPO. (Reference
Appendix A, CLP Directory.)
2. Resolving Problems Concerning Analytical Data
In the CLP^ Regional/Laboratory Communication System, authorized
Regional personnel can contact specified laboratory personnel, after
laboratory data submission only, to resolve questions regarding the final
data package. This system may never be used to initiate additional
analytical work to resolve data questions. All communications between
laboratories and Regional contacts are recorded by each party on a
Telephone Record Log, indicating the number of the Case and/or SAS
75
-------
concerned, the individuals making contact, the subject of the discussion
and its resolution. In follow-up, copies of completed telephone logs are
sent to SMO by both the Regional and laboratory parties and become a
permanent part of the Case/SAS file. An example of the Telephone Record
Log is included in Appendix C. Copies are available from SMO.
Prior to the laboratory's submission of the final data package, client
queries regarding those analyses or data are handled through SMO.
Depending on the nature of the question, SMO will respond or will direct
the client to the appropriate NPO official for resolution. Comments
regarding laboratory performance, whether positive or negative, should be
directed in writing to the appropriate Regional DPO, with a copy provided
to the NPO.
76
-------
CHAPTER IV
AUXILIARY SUPPORT SERVICES
77
-------
CHAPTER IV
AUXILIARY SUPPORT SERVICES
In addition to its analytical programs, the CLP provides several supplementary
services. These activities have developed as a natural adjunct to the program's
analytical services. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the user with a
description of each auxiliary program service and how the service may be accessed.
A. Sample Bottle Repository Program
1. Types and Quantities of Bottles Available
Under the Sample Bottle Repository operation, nine types of sample
containers are available to CLP clients for use in hazardous waste sampling
activities of the Superfund Program. Bottles provided through this
program are precleaned and QC-tested according to prescribed procedures
to ensure that no contamination exists that might affect sample data
results.
Clean, empty bottles and closures are shipped to users in protective
cardboard cartons. (Sample coolers and sample preserving agents are not
supplied through the Repository program.)
The following chart lists the types of bottles provided through this
program, the case sizes in which bottles are shipped, and the type{s) of
samples appropriate for collection in each bottle type. Each bottle type is
cleaned and QC tested by procedures directly related to the specific
analyses that may be performed on samples collected in the bottle.
Therefore, to ensure appropriate quality control, users are instructed to
utilize bottles only to collect sample types as listed on the following chart.
78
-------
SAMPLE BOTTLE REPOSITORY SERVICES
Container
Type
1
Description
80 ounce amber glass bottle
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
40-ml glass vial
with teflon-backed silicon
septum cap
1-liter high-density
polyethylene bottle
with poly cap
120-ml wide-mouth glass vial
with poly cap (white)
16-oz wide-mouth glass jar
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
8-oz wide-mouth glass jar
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
72
72
96
Used for RAS
Sample Type*
Ex tractable Organic*
Low Concentration
Water Samples
Volatile Organics
Low & Medium Concentration
Water Samples
Metals, Cyanide
Low Concentration
Water Samples
Volatile Organics
Low & Medium Concentration
Soil Samples
Metals, Cyanide
Medium Concentration
Water Samples
Extractable Organics
Low & Medium Concentration
Soil Samples
-and-
Metals, Cyanide
Low & Medium Concentration
Soil Samples
-and-
Dioxin
Soil Samples
-and-
Organics & Inorganics
High Concentration
Liquid & Solid Samples
*This column specifies the only type(s) of samples that should be collected in each
container.
(continued)
79
Rev: 10/84
-------
SAMPLE BOTTLE REPOSITORY SERVICES (continued)
Container
Type
Description
Used for
Sample Type*
4-oz wide-mouth glass jar
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
1-liter amber glass bottle
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
32-oz wide-mouth glass jar
with teflon-lined black
phenolic cap
120 Extractable Organics
Low & Medium Concentration
Soil Samples
-and-
Metals, Cyanide
Low & Medium Concentration
Soil Samples
-and-
Dioxin
Soil Samples
-and-
Organic ic. Inorganic
High Concentration
Liquid
-------
2. Ordering Procedures
The Sample Bottle Repository program may be used by any organization
scheduling samples through the CLP, and is commonly accessed by
Regional and remedial contractor clients. Two individuals from each
organization are designated by SMO as Repository Authorized Requestors
(RARs) and only these individuals may place bottle orders through the
program. State personnel should access the bottle program through their
EPA Regional office.
Users should contact SMO initially to become authorized to order from the
Repository and to obtain a supply of Delivery Order forms. Thereafter,
the RAR orders bottles directly from the Repository. Since the Repository
can respond only to orders submitted by a SMO-designated RAR, users
must notify SMO of any change in RAR designations.
There are three types of bottle orders, defined by the amount of tim(
between the date the order is placed and the requested delivery date:
o Routine Order — Ten or more working days lead time for
delivery.
o Fast-Turnaround Order — More than three days, but less than ten
days lead time for delivery.
o Emergency Order — Less than three days lead time for
delivery.
Routine orders are mailed to the Repository utilizing the Delivery Order
(DO), a four-part carbonless form. The DO must be signed by an RAR.
The first two copies of the completed DO are sent to the Repository at the
address indicated on the form, the third copy is sent to SMO, and the
fourth copy is retained for the user's file.
SI
-------
Fast-turnaround and emergency orders should be called in to the Reposi-
tory, at the telephone number provided on the form, and the written
Delivery Order distributed as outlined above, to coniirm the order. When
placing a telephone order, the RAR must give the Repository the DO
number for the order and provide the corresponding written DO in
followup.
Users should submit orders a minimum of two weeks in advance of the
required delivery date, whenever possible, to ensure timely and complete
delivery of bottles. Emergency and fast-turnaround orders are filled on an
"as available" basis from the Repository's emergency inventory stock. It
may not be possible to respond to all emergency and fast-turnaround
orders, as response depends on Repository inventory and in-process orders.
In the event that an order is cancelled, the user must immediately contact
the Repository to verbally cancel the order, and follow up with a
cancellation memo to the Repository, sending a copy of the memo to SMO.
Cancellation memos, as well as all other project-related correspondence,
should cite the appropriate DO number.
3. Shipment Information
Upon receipt of the Delivery Order, Repository personnel 'schedule ship-
ment and begin preparing the order. Repository personnel immediately
notify the RAR if for any reason the order cannot be met in full by the
requested delivery date. Often, partial shipments can be arranged over
several days to meet the client's requirement. If concurrent orders are
received at the Repository that cannot be filled in a timely manner and if
partial shipments cannot be satisfactorily arranged, the Repository
immediately notifies SMO, which coordinates with the involved Regional
Sample Control Center(s) in determining the priority of bottle orders based
on the Region's sampling needs.
82
-------
Each carton in a Repository shipment is marked "Box of ," and a
Repository Packing List (PL) is included in Box I of each shipment, so that
the designee can verify that the entire shipment has been received. In
addition, the Repository sends two copies of the shipping PL to the RAR at
the time of shipment. The RAR confirms with the designee that the entire
shipment was received in good condition, then enters the date of receipt
and signs the packing list in the space indicated to confirm receipt. The
RAR must return a copy of the signed packing list to SMO within seven
days of shipment receipt.
Procedures for Problem Resolution
a. Resolving Problems Concerning Bottle Shipment
If there are problems relating to shipment (Le., shipment does not
arrive by scheduled date, shipment is incomplete or contents are
damaged), the shipment designee or RAR (as appropriate to the
situation) should contact the Repository immediately to resolve the
problem. If the problem is not satisfactorily handled in this manner,
the RAR should then contact SMO for resolution.
b. Resolving Problems Concerning Bottle Contamination
If a. user has definitive cause to suspect that container contamination
may have affected sample analysis results, the concerned RSCC
should notify SMO by telephone and follow up with an explanatory
memorandum directed to the appropriate NPO Project Officer (PO).
The memorandum should include the following information:
description of the problem, rationale for suspecting bottle
contamination, supporting documentation (if available), and lot
numbeKs) for all bottles concerned. Bottle lot numbers must be
provided before any corrective action can be taken. Prior to
83
-------
requesting corrective action, the user should verify to the extent
possible that the contamination encountered is not a result of either
improper field procedures (e.g., use of contaminated water for field
blanks) or poor laboratory practice (e.g., background contamination)
and include this information as part of the rationale in the
memorandum submitted to the NPO.
After review of submitted information, the PO notifies SMO to
initiate appropriate follow-up action. Upon notification by SMO, the
Repository will first check the QC analysis record for the concerned
lot(s) of containers and verify that contract procedures were
correctly followed and that the lot passed the QC analysis. Should an
error be identified in this process, the Repository will notify SMO
immediately.
As a second step, following PO authorization the Repository will pull
the QC storage container for the bottle lot(s) and analyze the
container^) for suspected contaminants. SMO will notify the RSCC
concerning the analysis results, so that if there is a contamination
problem, analysis data from samples collected in other containers in
that lot can be appropriately flagged. Should contamination be
confirmed by analysis of the QC storage container, the Repository
will immediately identify the problem and correct procedures as
necessary to resolve it. Should a wide-spread problem be identified
at any time, RARs would be notified in a timely manner so that
bottles could be pulled before use in the field.
-------
5. Summary of Bottle Cleaning and Quality Control Procedures
Containers provided under this program are prepared in batches or lots of
approximately 100 containers. (Exact lot sizes for each bottle type are
determined, so that a bottle lot is not split between cases.) Bottles are
cleaned in lot groups, utilizing procedures specifically designed to remove
any possible contaminants. Different cleaning procedures are employed
according to the container material and the type(s) of samples that will be
collected in the container.
Each bottle lot is assigned a unique identifying number. This lot number is
permanently affixed to each bottle in the lot, recorded in the Repository
logbook, and entered on the shipment Packing List when bottles from that
lot are shipped. For QA purposes, it is vital that each container's lot
number be permanently associated with the sample collected in that
particular container. Therefore, it is recommended that samplers record
each container lot number and associated CLP sample numbers in their
field records at the time that samples are collected.
The Repository routinely performs QC analyses on one percent of the
number of containers per lot. No lot is released for shipment until
acceptable QC results are verified. QC analyses are performed by
equivalent methods to those utilized in CLP RAS programs, and are
specific to the types of samples that may be collected in the container. II
a container fails to pass the QC check, the associated lot of bottles is
pulled and reprocessed through the system.
A QC release number is assigned to each lot of bottles that passes QC
analysis, and is marked on both the analysis and storage QC containers for
each lot. The QC release number is cross-referenced with the lot number
in Repository records, so that all QC records can be accessed based on the
lot number identification.
S3
-------
In addition to the QC analysis check, an additional bottle is removed from
each lot and stored for QC purposes. QC storage containers are kept in a
contaminant-free area of the Repository which is monitored for volatile
compounds. The QC storage containers are retained as a backup to
recheck for cleanliness, should possible contamination of a lot of bottles
come into questions at a later date.
86
-------
kiformation Services
I. Regional Sample List Report
On a monthly basis, SMO distributes a Regional Sample List Report to each
Regional Sample Control Center (RSCC). This computerized report
provides a summary of the Region's use of CLP resources during the
previous month. The following information is included in the Sample List
Report:
o Case number
o Sample number
o Laboratory name and contract number
o Laboratory sample receipt date
o Sample weight and components analyzed
o Sample type
o Data due date
o Days late/early calculations for contractually required deliverables
(i.e., extraction, VOA analysis and sample data package).
This report is provided to the Region for use as a management and resource
planning tool, as well as for verification of monthly sample receipts and
analyses performed. While client activity is reported on a monthly basis,
information covering other time periods can be provided upon RSCC
request to SMO. An example of the Regional Sample List is contained in
Appendix D.
87
-------
2. Sample Status Information
In its sample management role, SMO schedules sample analysis and tracks
samples from shipment through data reporting, maintaining manual and
computerized tracking systems. SMO maintains ongoing communication
with the RSCC regarding sample status, and responds to inquiries from
concerned parties as appropriate.
3. General Program Information
Under the direction of CLP management, SMO serves as the program's
information center for both incoming calls, correspondence and dissemina-
tion of information. Upon request, SMO provides program participants and
interested parties with information and material on program services and
procedures, and refers callers to the proper sources for additional
information as appropriate.
-------
C. Enforcement Support
1. Generation of Enforcement Quality Data
One major objective of Superfund is to recover from responsible parties
costs incurred in the investigation and cleanup of hazardous waste sites.
The process by which these parties are identified and determined to be
responsible often involves litigation, and frequently the Agency's case is
based upon CLP analytical data generated from samples collected at a
given site. The CLP supports these and other enforcement requirements of
Superfund by ensuring that CLP-generated analytical data is admissable
and defensible in court. The CLP, in cooperation with the EPA National
Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC), has established detailed
procedures and documentation to ensure that CLP sample data meets
Agency enforcement standards.
a. Chain-of-Custody and Document Control
Each CLP analysis contract requires the laboratory contractor to
implement a comprehensive document control system and to employ
strict chain-of-custody procedures in the receipt and handling of
samples throughout the analysis and data reporting process. The
laboratory must have written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
for: receipt and log-in of samples, maintenance of sample security
after log-in, tracking the sample through all steps of preparation and
analysis, and organization and assembly of all sample-related
documentation on a Case-specific basis. Required document control
and chain-of-custody records include, at a minimum: sample tags,
custody records, sample tracking records, analyst logbook pages,
bench sheets, chromatographic charts, computer printouts, raw data
summaries, instrument logbook pages, correspondence and the
document inventory.
-------
Before a laboratory is awarded a CLP contract and continuing
periodically throughout the life of the contract, each laboratory
facility is audited by NEIC to ensure compliance with these require-
ments. In addition to facility audits, laboratory data and evidence
documentation are reviewed by NEIC on a regular basis, as described
below.
b. NE^C Evidence Audits
Laboratories are contractually required to purge their files of all
evidence and other documentation relating to sample analysis, and to
submit a complete Case file purge package (as detailed in the
previous section) to NEIC six months after submission of analysis
data. The Contractor Evidence Audit Team (CEAT) reviews all
document control packages to verify that the documentation is
complete and conforms to contractual requirements, and routinely
audits a selected number of packages for document accuracy and
suitability for enforcement uses. A list of Case file purge materials
is included in Appendix D.
NEIC evidence audits involve production of sample profiles. A
sample profile traces the path and handling of specific samples from
the point of collection through shipping, laboratory receipt, chemical
analysis and data reporting. This process identifies any gaps or lapses
in the chain-of-custody so that measures may be taken before
enforcement case preparation either to correct the problem or
eliminate the data from consideration in enforcement action.
Examples of NEIC sample profiles for organic and inorganic Cases are
incuded in Appendix O.
Following review and/or audit, NEIC returns laboratory Case file
purge packages to the originating Region, where the packages are
filed with the analysis data and may be subject to additional Regional
review, in addition to the routine generation of sample profiles in
evidence audits, authorized Regional personnel and enforcement
attorneys may request NEIC to prepare sample profiles for Cases to
support enforcement activities,
90
-------
2. Additional CLP Enforcement Support
Enforcement activities frequently require direct CLP support. Court
appearances and other mandated deadlines often do not allow sufficient
time for completion of the normal Case file purge package submission,
review and audit process, ii this event, CLP assistance may be required.
Also, data package evaluation and /or testimony from laboratory or CLP
personnel may be needed.
The CLP has established procedures to meet these short-term requirements
through SMO, which coordinates and responds to enforcement-related
requests. This process is described in the following sections.
a. Request Procedures
Requests are originated by a Regional counsel, NEIC or other
appropriately designated EPA personnel, and are submitted in a
memorandum to the NPO Program Manager (PM). The PM reviews
the memorandum, determines necessary CLP action and forwards the
request along with his directions for action to SMO. If a request
requires immediate response, the requestor should contact SMO
directly by telephone and relay the request, following up with the
written request memorandum to the PM.
b. Requestor Information Required
The following information must be provided by the requestor to
initiate CLP action:
o Name and telephone number of Regional contact coordinating the
enforcement activity
o Case numbeKs) of specific site sampling(s)
91
-------
o Sample number(s)
o Date(s) of sample collection
o Laboratory(ies) that performed the analysis
o Type of support needed
Most requests can be met quickly, however a two-week lead time is
strongly recommended.
Documentaton/Support Provided by CLP
in responding to enforcement support requests, SMO provides the
following support:
o Arranges for the timely delivery of all laboratory and evidence
documentation relating to specific sample analyses (within a
minimum of seven days of request, if designated).
o Obtains information relating to sample analysis or handling not
specifically required under laboratory contracts,
o Arranges for expert testimony by laboratory or CLP personnel.
o Augments Regional resources for analytical data review.
o Supplies replacement copies of analytical data.
92
-------
EX Cost Recovery Substantiation
The CLP provides documentation concerning program analytical costs to the
ERA'S Office of Waste Programs Enforcement (OWPE) in support of Superfund
cost recovery efforts. Formal procedures have been developed to respond to
Agency requests for this information. Site-specific cost data, the information
required to initiate this process, and cost documentation provided by CLP are
des-rribed in the following sections.
1. Request Procedures
Requests for cost recovery (CR) documentation on a site must be made
through OWPE, using the Cost Recovery Checklist. This checklist is
designed to provide basic site information needed to compile cost
documentation from the CLP and other sources. A copy of the OWPE Cost
Recovery Checklist is included in Appendix D. Each requesting office must
complete the CR Checklist, providing all information requested, and mail
the completed checklist to OWPE.
In response to requests, OWPE collects and organizes cost-related
documentation from the CLP and several other sources, such as the EPA
Financial Management Division, the EPA Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, and REM/FIT, TAT and other Agency contractors. In
case of conflicts, OWPE is responsible for prioritizing incoming requests.
A minimum lead time of four to six weeks is required to complete this
process and provide the requestor with a full site cost recovery report.
-------
2. Requestor Information Required
Requestors are asked to supply the following information items on the CR
Checklist to enable the CLP to prepare its cost documentation package.
(Complete checklist information is required to obtain a full OWPE cost
report, which contains information from other sources in addition to the
CLP.)
o Identification number
The appropriate CLP Case or SAS number must be entered here. If the
Case or SAS number refers to more than one site, the specific sample
numbers (from the Case Traffic Reports or SAS Packing List) related to
the sites in question must be provided.
o Name and location of site
o Date the cost report is needed
A minimum of four weeks from the date of request must be given. Six week
lead time is recommended whenever possible.
3. Documentation Provided by CLP
The CLP provides an information package to OWPE which is part of
OWPE's full cost recovery report to the requestor. The CLP provides the
following information to OWPE:
o Financial Summary for Cost Analysis
This summary lists analytical and sample management costs on a Case
and/or SAS basis, showing total expenses for a particular site. Informa-
tion on how sample management costs are computed is included.
-------
o Summary of Invoices, Vouchers, and Cancelled Checks
This report lists all SAS laboratory invoice numbers and includes SAS
cancelled check numbers. The summary is organized by SAS number
and laboratory name.
o Routine Analytical Services (RAS) Cost Report
This computerized report is organized by Case number and laboratory
contract. It includes laboratory invoice numbers, net analysis costs,
total of adjustments for late/early deliverables, and sample
management costs; and lists total costs on a sample-by-sample,
laboratory contract, and Case basis.
o Special Analytical Services (SAS) Cost Report
This computerized report provides a brief description of the service
provided, including the number of samples analyzed, data turnaround
time, contract start date, laboratory receipt date, unit costs, sample
management costs, and contract status; and lists total contract costs on
SAS and laboratory bases.
o Copies of att SAS-Reiated Cancelled Checks and Laboratory Invoices
CLP documentation, as described above, is assembled by SMO and
submitted to OWPE OWPE provides this CLP information, along with
documentation gathered from other sources, to the Regional case
development team in the full cost recovery package.
95
-------
Data Review Services
In its program support role, SMO has developed systems of quality assurance and
quality control evaluation, working under the guidance of EPA personnel most
directly concerned with hazardous waste site data quality assessment. These
systems can be applied to CLP data generated from IFB laboratory analysis
contracts, upon client request.
The objectives of the data review program are:
o To provide systematic and standardized data quality assessment at the
Case, sample and sample fraction levels.
o To increase the amount of use able data by resolving or proposing solutions
to analytical or quality control problems.
o To determine the useabifity and limitations of the data given particular
field or policy assessment questions.
The purpose of the CLP* data review service program is to assist, supplement
and /or extend Regional capabilities in evaluating the quality and applicability of
data for intended uses. The program's application of standardized data
evaluation techniques and procedures to given Cases and samples of interest
ensures the Regional client a degree of confidence when using the data for
enforcement or remedial action planning. Several different types of data review
may be conducted depending upon Regional needs and service availability.
1. Types of Review Provided
Four basic types of data review are provided in this program. One or more
types of review may be requested for a given Case, and review may be
requested for more than one Case. As indicated, these data review
services are intended to supplement or extend, but not to replace, Regional
data review.
96
-------
The four types of data review currently provided through this program are
summarized below;
o QA/QC Compliance Review
A technical and administrative review of each Case, sample, and
sample fraction for compliance with contractually-required ranges on
measures of precision and accuracy.
o Problem Case Review
A technical evaluation of a Case which has failed a Regional or SMO
QA/QC Compliance Review in order to resolve or propose solutions to
analytical or quality assurance problems.
o Applications Review
A technical evaluation of the validity and limitations of the data given
particular field or policy assessment questions requiring actual
measures of precision and accuracy.
o Consulting Review
A technical second opinion of the data from a previous review. Serves
an appeal function in determining data useability.
Each type of review is further characterized below.
In the QA/QC Compliance Review, the following areas are examined: data
completeness, spectra matching quality, surrogate spike results, matrix
spike results, duplicate sample analysis results, blank analysis results,
instrument tuning and performance results, chromatography checks, and
calibration results. Criteria from each area of performance are applied in
the evaluation of each fraction. Acceptability or unacceptability is
determined separately for volatiles, semi-voiatiles, pesticides and dioxins,
using contract ranges as guidance.
97
-------
The purpose of the Problem Case Review is to increase the amount of
useable data by resolving or proposing solutions to analytical or quality
assurance problems. Data, which have failed the QA/QC Compliance
Review may be adequate for the intended purpose, even when laboratory
problems cannot be resolved.
The Applications Review attempts to determine the actual quality of the
data and relate this assessment to particular field or policy assessment
questions. The confidence limits set by compliance to the contractually-
determined basic data quality measures are further examined. Additional
statistical measures are calculated and reported, and the new confidence
levels are related to the Regional client's intended use (e.g., enforcement,
site screening, remedial design, site monitoring).
The Consulting Review allows the user to obtain a second opinion of the
data quality in problematic situations where the assessment of data quality
is either complex, critical or very dependent upon field conditions.
2. Request Procedures
Requests for Data Review Services should be directed to the Regional
Deputy Project Officer (DPO), with a copy submitted to SMO,
Attention: Data Review Team, and a copy provided to the Regional
Sample Control Center. In follow-up, the DPO must notify SMO that the
request is authorized, or the DPO may choose to initiate all requests for
the Region.
/
Upon authorization by the DPO, SMO schedules the review and notifies the
requestor of the date the review is scheduled for completion. It should be
noted that review cannot be initiated until all deliverables for the subject
Case(s) have been received from the laboratory.
-------
All requests should be placed using the SMO Data Review Request
memorandum. An example of the request memorandum is provided in
Appendix D. Copies are available from SMO on request.
3. Requestor Information Required
In completing the Data Review Request form, the client must provide the
following information for each Case for which review is requested:
o SMO Case number
o Site name
o Analytical laboratory name(s)
o Number of samples
o Sample list
o Type(s) of review requested
o Requested date for review completion
o User name and contact
o Intended use of data
A minimum lead time of two weeks is required for data review. However,
review time is variable depending upon the number of samples involved and
the nature of the review. If conflicts occur, the appropriate DPO(s) will be
notified and asked to prioritize requests.
*. Documentation Provided by CLP
An evaluation report, including supporting statistics and documentation, is
produced with each type of review.
The QA/QC Compliance Review report indicates for each sample fraction
whether the data are considered: acceptable, acceptable given
qualifications noted, or unacceptable. Reasons for the designation are
99
-------
discussed and completed data review forms for each of the areas of
performance are included in the report to the client. Examples of data
review forms used in the QA/QC Compliance Report are included in
Appendix 0.
The contents and format of reports for Problem Case, Applications and
Consulting Reviews are determined by the nature of the data problem(s)
being examined and/or the purpose for which the data will be used. Any
statistical measures used to define data quality and the raw data
supporting conclusions are appended to these reports.
100
-------
CHAPTER V
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE
101
-------
CHAPTER V
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE
The purpose of this chapter is to present a summary of the different aspects of quality
assurance (QA) and to show their interrelationship within the overaJJ structure of the
program. This information is included to familiarize users with the program's basic
QA principles and their application, and to facilitate a more complete understanding
of the quality of CLP analytical data in terms of potential utilization.
A. hteriace with Agency Quality Assurance
The primary role of the CLP is to support the Agency's Superfund investigation
and cleanup efforts by producing analytical data of known and documented
quality useable for Agency enforcement actions keyed to identification of
pollutant sources and recovery of cleanup costs. Therefore, a comprehensive
quality assurance program that reflects Agency QA objectives has been
incorporated into all aspects of CLP operations. The CLP links two primary
aspects of quality assurance (QA): field QA, which includes field sampling
operations and QA project planning; and laboratory QA, which is comprised of
analytical method QC and external or program QA.
Field operations include sampling activities performed by the EPA Regions and
National Remedial Action/Field Investigation Team (REM/FIT) and Technical
Assistance Team (TAT) contractors, which result in samples being processed
through the CLP for analysis. The CLP NPO coordinates closely with these and
other Agency sampling groups and Agency QA teams, in the development and
application of quality-con trolled Program Plans and site-specific Project Plans.
These plans include the consistent use of Agency-specified containers, sampling
techniques, sample preservation, sample tags and chain-of-custody documents,
and adherence to DOT regulations in sample shipment. The CLP strongly
supports the use of consistent field sampling, and sample packaging and shipment
102
-------
techniques, and specifies types of sample containers and required sample
volumes for appropriate target analyses. Through its Sample Bottle Repository
system, the CLP provides Superfund samplers with the precleaned sampling
bottles for use in the field.
The CLP is directly involved in all aspects of laboratory QA. Analytical methods
require extensive Agency-specified quality control (QC) procedures and
documentation to ensure a complete data product that will withstand legal
scrutiny. The CLP operates an extensive external QA program, which includes:
pre-award and post-award laboratory performance evaluation sample analyses
and laboratory facility evaluations, required submission of laboratory Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) for analytical operations and documentation,
continuous monitoring of lab performance by Headquarters contract POs and
Regional DPOs, and a multi-level data review process to evaluate the validity of
the data product.
The CLP, through a variety of mechanisms, continuously strives to improve the
quality of program data by maintaining state-of-the-art analytical methods,
refining the structure and requirements of analytical contracts, and strengthen-
ing lab operations. CLP QA activities are coordinated through the NPO QA
Officer, to ensure that the CLP is operating in accordance with overall Agency
QA mandates.
The application of field QA is addressed in Chapters II and III, where sample
volume, container, preservation, packaging, shipment and documentation
requirements are discussed. Analysis or method QC is addressed for each
analytical program in Chapter II, which contains a description of contract
analytical methods and QC requirements for each program. The following
sections of this chapter describe the program's external laboratory QA activities.
103
-------
B. Laboratory Selection Process
i. Bid Price
The first criterion for laboratory selection is bid price. Following bid
opening, bid abstracts are reviewed and evaluated by NPO and EPA
contract officials. The lowest competitive bidders are selected to
participate in pre-award bid confirmation, the process through which
bidder responsiveness and responsibility for award are demonstrated and
evaluated.
2. Pre-Award Bid Confirmation
Pre-award bid confirmation may include three activities: (1) bidder
analysis of performance evaluation (PE) samples; (2) bidder submission of
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs); and (3) site evaluation of the
bidder's facility, performed by EPA program management and contracts
personnel.
a. Performance Evaluation Sample Analysis
Laboratories chosen to participate in the pre-award process are sent
a set of PE samples for analysis. The PE samples are prepared by
EMSL/LV and are representative of the types of field samples that
the contractor would routinely be analyzing under the subject
procurement. The laboratory is required to analyze PE samples
according to contract procedures set forth in the IFB, and to report
PE sample data according to IFB requirements, within a time period
of 21 days. Bidders* PE sample data are evaluated by NPO and
EMSL/LV personnel, in terms of compliance with contract require-
ments and accuracy of determination of compounds at the levels
-------
known to be in the PE samples. Analysis results are rated by a
scoresheet developed by EMSL/LV. The PE sample score is a primary
consideration in determining bidder responsiveness/responsibility for
contract award.
b. Standard Operating Procedures
Bidders are required to submit copies of all laboratory Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) at the time of submission of PE sample
data. SOPs are not required to coincide with each specific detail of
the contract requirement, but must be representative of good
laboratory practices and must demonstrate that the laboratory has a
facility-wide quality assurance program in place and operating.
Bidder SOPs are reviewed by NPO and EMSL/LV personnel and are
utilized by EPA in performance of the site evaluation.
c. Laboratory Evaluation
EPA NPO and EMSL/LV personnel participate in site evaluations of
laboratory facilities of bidders which scored acceptably on the PE
sample analyses. EPA personnel perform a walk-through of the
facility and complete a site evaluation questionnaire. The results of
the site evaluation are considered in final determination of bidder
responsiveness/responsibility for contract award.
105
-------
C. Laboratory Start-Up Process
Laboratories entering the program undergo a learning curve process during which
they become fully familiarized and obtain expertise in application of program
methodologies and quality control procedures. To reduce the learning curve
period and bring laboratories "up to speed" in a timely manner, CLP management
employs a series of laboratory start-op procedures which are utilized during the
laboratory's initial contract operations and whenever laboratory problems are
identified during contract performance.
1. Provision of Standards to Laboratory
Immediately following contract award, EMSL/LV arranges for the provision
of standard materials (SMs) to the contractor, through the Agency's
contractor-operated QA Materials Bank. These SMs are utilized by the
laboratory in performing initial instrument calibrations and as reference
standards throughout contract performance.
2. . PO Review of First Data Packages
Initial data packages are targeted for immediate review and evaluation by
the NPO Project Officer (PO), EMSL/LV and the Region. This review is
intensive and focuses on any problems the laboratory has, either in applying
methodologies or in reporting the data. The PO then supplies feedback to
the laboratory concerning the status of the data and works with the
laboratory in identifying and remedying problems.
3. PO/DPO Laboratory Visits
Depending on the extent of the problems found during the review of an
initial data package, the PO may visit the laboratory facility and work on-
site with laboratory personnel in rectifying problems. This process also
106
-------
occurs on an ongoing basis during the life of the contract. Site evaluations
are performed yearly by EPA staff, and the PO and/or Deputy Project
Officer (DPO) visit the laboratory on an as-needed basis to resolve
performance problems.
PO/DPO/SMO/Laboratory Communication
Telephone communication is the most widely applied method for problem
solving and maintaining efficient laboratory operations, both during the
laboratory start-up phase and throughout the performance of the contract.
During the start-up period, communication links are established and the
laboratory becomes familiarized with the communication process. In
general, the laboratory notifies SMO immediately upon identification of
any problem regarding the samples (e.g., insufficient sample volume) or any
difficulties encountered in analysis. SMO routinely resolves sample-related
problems in coordination with the Regional client, and refers technical
problems to the contract PO, who contacts the laboratory and resolves the
problem. The resolution and any specific actions taken are reported to
SMO which records this information as part of the permanent Case record.
The laboratory also records the problem and resolution on the sample data
report, so that the Region considers this information in association with
evaluating and using the data. With the appointment of Regional DPOs to
assist in the monitoring of contractor performance, the DPO will play a
major role in ongoing laboratory problem resolution in coordination with
the PO.
107
-------
D. Laboratory Performance Evaluation
1. Performance Evaluation Sample Analysis
Performance Evaluation (PE) samples are prepared by ORD EMSL/LV and
sent to contractor laboratories for analysis, normally on a quarterly basis.
PE samples are typically shipped as double blind" samples, i.e., the PE
samples are not discernable from routine field samples, to ensure that the
laboratory processes the samples in a routine manner. Evalution of PE
sample data is performed by EMSL/LV and is used by the NPO in formally
evaluating laboratory contract performance. Additionally, PE sample QC
data are entered by EMSL/LV into the program's QA Data Base, and are
utilized, along with other laboratory data, in trend analyses, and evaluation
and revision of contract QC criteria.
2. Laboratory Site Evaluation
At least once a year, EPA NPO, Regional and EMSL/LV personnel visit
each laboratory facility and evaluate laboratory procedures. The evalua-
tion reports which result from these site visits are utilized by the NPO in
identifying and remedying laboratory performance problems. Repeat site
visits by EPA NPO, Regional and EMSL/LV personnel are made on an as-
needed basis throughout the year, to resolve laboratory problems.
3. Corrective Action
Upon identification of laboratory performance problems, the PO and DPO
work closely with the laboratory to effect correction of the problems.
Depending on the scope of the problems, the laboratory may be placed on
temporary hold, whereby the laboratory does not receive additional
samples for analysis until the problem has been corrected.
108
-------
Should the contractor's non-compliance to contract performance or
deliverable requirements continue, the EPA Contracting Officer is
requested by the NPO to issue a Show Cause Notice to the contractor.
This document requires the contractor, within a ten-day period of time, to
present the government with any facts bearing on the issue, to be used in
the government's determination regarding whether the contractor's failure
to perform arose out of causes beyond the laboratory's control and without
fault or negligence on the part of the contractor. The contractor, in
response, must submit substantial evidence to demonstrate that the
contract should not be terminated for default.
A recovery plan is generally included as part of the contractor's response
to the Show Cause Notice. EPA Contracts and NPO officials review the
contractor's response and proposed recovery plan, and determine whether
the contractor has presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate timely
remedy of the noncompliance. Following this review, if the contractor has
presented acceptable evidence toward recovery, the government issues a
Cure Notice to the contractor which delineates the government-accepted
recovery plan that the contractor must follow to avoid contract termina-
tion. The government's recovery plan includes actions and time schedules
for completion of each step of the recovery process, and specifies an
overall time period acceptable for completion of recovery.
Should the contractor not comply with the recovery schedule, the next and
final step may be contract termination by the government for default. In
addition to terminating the laboratory* contract, this action impacts on
evaluation of the contractor's responsiveness/responsibility for award under
future CLP solicitations.
109
-------
E. Sample Data Evaluation
I. Intercomparison Check Sample Studies
Intercomparison check sample studies are initiated by the EPA Regions on
a periodic basis and involve simultaneous shipment of known samples to
two or more CLP and/or Regional laboratories for analysis. Check samples
are routinely shipped as '^single blind" sample, i.e., the laboratory is aware
samples are check samples but does not know sample composition.
Analytical data from study participants are compiled by the Region and
used in comparative data evaluation. The Region provides intercomparison
sample study results to the NPO and EMSL/LV for use in programmatic
applications. These studies differ from the PE sample program in that
check sample data do not result in contractual evaluation of individual
laboratory performance.
2. Regional Sample Split/Spike Programs
This Regionally-directed program involves simultaneous sample analysis by
two or more CLP and/or Regional laboratory facilities, and provides the
Region with comparative data utilized in evaluating application of
methods. In the sample split program, the Regions arrange to have field
samples split and sent to different contractor and Regional laboratories for
analysis. In the sample spike program, a known sample volume is prepared
and divided into two or more equivalent portions. Each sample portion is
then spiked with known levels of contaminants, and sent to different
contractor and/or Regional laboratories for analysis. Results of split/spike
sample analyses performed by CLP laboratories are provided to the NPO
and EMSL/LV by the Region.
110
-------
F. Analytical Data Review
Upon completion of analysis and data reporting, the laboratory simultaneously
sends a copy of the complete data package to the CLP SMO, EMSL/LV and the
Regional client. Each of these groups performs complementary aspects of data
review.
1. EMSL/LV Data Review
On a routine basis, EMSL/LV performs a comprehensive QA audit on CLP
sample data packages using Mil. Standard 105O. Based on this review,
EMSL/LV prepares a detailed report on the data packages, which is
provided to the NPO and to Regional clients by SMO. This review package
is valuable to both program management and users in evaluating the
suitability of the contract methods to the types of samples analyzed, the
quality of the analytical data, and the performance of the contractor
laboratories.
In addition, EMSL/LV enters surrogate and spike recovery information into
the program's QA Data Base. These data are then statistically evaluated
and utilized to determine and revise contract QC acceptance windows for
CLP-generated data and to characterize laboratory performance.
2. Regional Data Review
The Regional client reviews all data packages resulting from Regional
sampling efforts, ft is the responsibility of the Region, as the data user, to
determine the applicability of each data package to its intended use, e.g.,
site investigation support, cleanup activities and/or enforcement actions.
In this review, the Region applies its standard CLP data review procedures
and references the requirements of the contract Statement of Work under
which the analyses were performed.
Ill
-------
3. SMO Data Check for Completeness
Each CLP-generated data package is checked for completeness by SMO
upon receipt. SMO reviews the data package verifying that all
contractually-required forms are included and that forms are completed
according to contract specifications. Should SMO identify any missing
information, incomplete forms or other problems with the data package,
SMO immediately notifies the NPO PO, EMSL/LV and the Regional client.
At this time, the laboratory is contacted and instructed to submit the
missing or incorrect portions of the data package.
*• SMO Data Review Services
Under direction of CLP management, SMO may perform additional data
review, checking the data for compliance to contract QC procedures and
parameters and for applicability to its intended uses. This review is
provided on a limited basis in response to specific Regional request.
Consult Chapter IV, Section E, for a complete description of the data
review services provided and appropriate request procedures.
112
-------
G. Analytical Methodology Improvement/Development
1. Protocol Standardization and Improvement
Refining and improving analytical protocols to maintain state-of-the-art
status and to reflect newly-defined or changed requirements of the
Superfund effort, is an ongoing activity for all CLP participants. This
effort is accomplished through an established system of information
transfer coordinated through the NPO. All program participants submit
comments or recommendations to the NPO on an ongoing basis. The NPO
reviews all submitted information and considers recommendations for
program application, on a periodic basis.
Since 1982, input on protocol improvements has come primarily through the
CLP Technical Caucuses which involve NPO, EMSL/LV, EMSL/Cincinnati,
EPA Region, SMO, laboratory and other program support contractor
personneL Analytical methods and data reporting formats are reviewed
and discussed in detail at the caucus sessions. EPA personnel then review
caucus discussions and compile concensus recommendations for protocol
changes. Following NPO approval of recommended changes, laboratory
contracts are modified by the Contracting Officer to include recommended
revisions, through contract change order actions. All laboratory contracts
within an analytical .program are changed concurrently to maintain
consistency across the program.
113
-------
2. Method Development
Development of new analytical methods may be initiated by a newly
identified or redefined Agency analysis requirement, such as dioxin
analysis. Analytical methods utilized in the CLP are based on EPA-
deveioped and approved methodologies. The NPO, EMSL/LV, EMSL/Cin-
cinnati, and/or EPA Regions have historically contributed to development
of new program analytical methodologies. Regardless of the group
responsible for method development, methods are reviewed by several
sources and are tested prior to implementation, to the extent possible to
meet program requirements.
-------
APPENDICES TO
CLP USER'S GUIDE
-------
APPENDIX A
CLP DIRECTORY
A-l
-------
EPA HEADQUARTERS AND NATIONAL LABORATORIES
CLP National Program Office (NPO)
USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Hazardous Response Support Division (Mail Code: WH-548A)
Support Services Branch
401 M Street, S.W. (Mali - Room S213)
Vashington, DC 20460
Stanley Kovell, National Program Manager
Mary Mahsetky, NPO Secretary
202/382-7906 FTS 382-7906
Duane Geuder, QA Officer
202/382-7943 FTS 382-7943
Fred Haeberer, Organic Technical Officer
202/382-7942 FTS 382-7942
Joan Fisk, Organic Technical Officer
202/382-3115 FTS 382-3115
Gary Ward, Inorganic Technical Officer
202/382-4619 FTS 382-4619
USEPA Office of Administration
Procurement and Contracts Management Division
(Mail Code: PM-214)
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Street Address:
499 South Capitol Street
Fairchild Building, 3rd Floor
Washington, DC
Marian Bernd
Contracting Officer
202/382-3195 FTS 382-3195
Dave Stutz
Contract Specialist
202/382-2357 FTS 382-2357
A-2
-------
EPA Headquarters and National Laboratories (cont.)
USEPA Office of Research and Development
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL/LV)
P.O. Box 15027
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
Street Address:
944 East Harmon Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
Ross Robeson, Acting Director
QA Division
702/798-2J03 FTS 545-2103
Gareth Pearson, Chief
Toxics <3c Hazardous Waste Branch
702/798-2383 FTS 545-2383
Gene Meier
Special Assistant to the Director
702/798-2534 FTS 545-2534
USEPA National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC)
Denver Federal Center
Building 53, Entrance E-2
Box 25227
Denver, Colorado 80225
Ted Meiggs, Assistant Director
Laboratory Services
303/234-4661 FTS 234-4661
Robert Laidlaw
Evidence Audit Unit
303/234-4706 FTS 234-4706
A-3
-------
REGIONAL DEPUTY PROJECT OFFICERS
Region I
Region II
Region III
Region IV
Region V
Region VI
Region VII
Region VIII
Region IX
Region X
Edward Taylor
617/861-6700 FTS S28-6700
William Coakley
201/321-6702 FTS 3*0-6702
Patricia Krantz
301/220-2700 FTS 922-3752
Tom Bennett, Jr.
000/506-3112 FTS 250-3112
Charles Elly
312/353-8370 FTS 353-8370
William Langley
713/950-1766 FTS 526-1766
Robert Kleopfer
913/236-3881 FTS 926-3881
John Tiistra
303/230-3263 FTS 230-3263
Harold Takenaka
015/970-7080 FTS 050-7080
Arnold Gahler
206/002-0370 FTS 399-0370
A-0
-------
REGIONAL SAMPLE CONTROL CENTERS
Authorized Requestors
Region I
Edward Fitzpatrick, ESD Director
FTS 828-6700
Thomas Spittler, Chief
Technical Support Branch
FTS 828-6700
*Edward Taylor, CLP DPO
FTS 828-6700
Region II
* Richard Spear, Chief
Surveillance
-------
RSCCs (coot,)
Region V
Curtis Ross, CRL Director
FTS 353-8370
*Charles Elly, CLP DPO
FTS 353-8370
(RAS only)
EJcE:
Kathy Getty
Cindy Bacunas
312/663-9^15
CH2M Hill:
3erry Bills
Lin Klann
* 14/272-2426
Roy F. Weston:
Kurt Stimpson
Geoff Watkins
Tom DeFouw
312/498-9090
Region VI
*Keith Bradley
FTS 729-9770
Minnie Rojo
FTS 727-9990
Dave Peters, Chief
Hazardous Waste Section
FTS 729-9783
(RAS only)
EJcE:
John Totin, Asst. FJTL
David Anderson
3airo Guevara
Hunt Chapman
Doug Collins
214/742-4521
Primary Authorized Requestor
A-6
-------
RSCCs (cont.)
Region VII
•Charles HensJey, Chief
Laboratory Branch
FTS 926-38S1
Joyce Woods
FTS 926-3881
Bob Kleopfer, CLP DPO
FTS 926-3881
Region VIII
*Keith Schwab, Assc. ESD Director
FTS 327-4935
Tom Staible
FTS 234-3678
Region IX
»Harold Takenaka, CLP DPO
FTS 454-7484
Laura Tom
FTS 454-8379
Frank Day
FTS 454-8200
Region X
*Gary O'Neal, ESD Director
FTS 399-1295
John Osborn, Regional PO
FTS 399-0837
Joyce Crosson
FTS 399-8562
* Primary Authorized Requestor
A-7
-------
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICE
CLP Sample Management Office (SMO)
P.O. Box 818
Alexandria, Virginia 22313
Street Address:
300 N. Lee Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
703/557-2090 FTS 557-2490
David Stewart,
Project Manager
Dick Thacker,
Deputy Project Manager
Tina DeYoung, Group Leader
Management Information Systems, Invoice Processing
and Cost Recovery
Linda Haas, Group Leader
Analytical Services
Leslie Braun, RAS Sampling Controller
EPA Regions I - IV, Zones 1 and 2
Eileen O'Connor, RAS Sampling Controller
EPA Regions V - X
Maka Grogard, SAS Sampling Controller
Dioxin and EPA Region V
Roch Mongeon, SAS Sampling Controller
EPA Regions I - IV, Zone 1
Paula Ausserer, SAS Sampling Controller
EPA Regions VI - X, Zone 2
Deborah Miller, Group Leader, Special Projects
IFB Development, User's Guide and Communication System
Steve Manzo, Special Projects Coordinator
Bottle Repository Services and Meeting Planning
Rob Pritchard, Head
Enforcement Support
Don Trees, Head
Data Review and QA Support •:•
Paul Friedman,
QA Chemist
Bill Eckel,
QA Support
A-8
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
RAS DELIVERABLE AND DATA REPORTING FORMS
B-l
-------
RAS ORGANIC
DELIVERABLES INDEX
I. Case Narrative
The Case narrative must contain: Case number, Contract number, summary
of any QC, sample, shipment and analytical problems, and documentation of all
Internal decision tree processes used. Outline problems encountered and final
solutions. Be as specific and detailed as necessary.
___QC Summary
A. Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary (Form II)
B. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary (Form III)
C. Reagent Blank Summary (Form IV)
(If more than a single form is necessary, it must be arranged in
chronological order.)
D. GC/MS Tuning and Calibration Standard (Form V)
1. DFTPP in chronological order; by instrument.
2. BFB in chronological order; by instrument.
III. Sample Data Package " " "~~ ———
A. Sample data in increasing SMO Number order:
1. HSL Results - Organic Analysis Data Sheet (Form I)
2. GC/MS tentative ID (Form I, Part B) - Must be included even
if no compounds are found; if so, indicate on form: "no
volatile compounds found" and/or "no semi-volatile compounds
found."
3. Rav data - in order: VOA, BNA, Pesticide
a. Reconstructed ion chromatogram(a) (GC/MS), chromatogram(s)
(GC)
b. Data System Printout
• Quantitation report or legible facsimile (GC/MS)
* Integration report or data system printout (GC)
c. RSL spectra with lab generated standard (Dual Display)
* data systems incapable of dual display shall provide
spectra in order:
B-2
-------
- raw HSL compound spectra
- enhanced or background subtracted spectra
•
- laboratory generated HSL standard
d. GC/MS library search spectra for Tentatively Identified
Conpound(s) (TIC)
e. Quantitation/Calculation of tentative ID concentration(s)
W*Standards Data Package
A. Current list of laboratory calculated instrument detection Halts
for all HSL compounds.
B. Initial Calibration Data (Fora VI) - in order: VOA, BNA; by
instrument if more than one instrument used*
1. When more than one initial calibration is performed, the data
must be put in chronological order. All initial calibration data must be
included even for a specific Case.
C. Continuing Calibration (Form VII) - in order: VOA, BNA; by
instrument if more than one instrument used.
1. When more than one Continuing Calibration is performed, forms
must be in chronological order.
D. Pesticide forms in the following order:
1. Form VIII - Pesticide Evaluation Standards Summary
2. Form IX - Pesticide/PCB Standards Summary
3. Form X - Pesticide/PCB Identification (only required for
positive results)
E. VOA standard(s) chromatograms and data system printouts (or legible
facsimile). Spectra are not required.
F. BNA standard(s) chromatograms and data system printouts (or legible
facsimile). Spectra are not required.
G. All pesticide evaluation standard(s) (A, B, and C) chromatograms and
data system printouts in chronological order.
H. All pesticide Individual Standard Mix (A or B) chromatograms and data
system printouts.
B-3
-------
Z. Pesticide Quantitat ion standard(s) ehromatogramc and data system
printouts.
?Tlav QC Data Package•
A. DFTPP
1. Bar graph spectrum
2. Mass listing
B. BFB
1. Bar graph spectrum
2. Mass listing
C. Blank Data
1. Tabulated results (Fora I)
2. GC/MS tentative ID sheet (Fora I, Part B) tven if none found
3. Raw Data - In order: VOX, BNA, Pesticide
a. Reconstructed ion chromatogram(s) and quantitation
report(s) or legible facsimile (GC/MS)
b. Chroaatograa(s) and data system printout(s) (CC)
c. HSL spectra with lab generated standard (dual display)
* data systems which are incapable of dual display shall
provide spectra in order:
- raw HSL compound spectra
- enhanced or background subtracted spectra
- laboratory generated HSL standard spectra
d. GC/MS library search spectra for Tentatively Identified
Compounds (TIC)
e. Quantltation/Calculation of Tentative ID concentrations
D. Matrix Spike Data
1. Tabulated results (Form I) of non-spiked compounds
2. Raw Data - in order: VGA, BNA, Pesticide
B-4
-------
•. Reconstructed ion chromatogram(s) and quantisation report(s)
or legible facsimile (CC/MS)
• spectra net required •
b. ChroBAtograa(s) and data system printout(s) (GC)
Matrix Spike Duplicate Data
1. Tabulated results (Form I) of non-spiked compounds
2. Raw Data - in order: VOA, SNA, Pesticide
a. Reconstructed ion chromatogram(s) and quantitation report(s)
or legible facsimile (CC/MS)
• spectra not required
b. Chromatograa(s) and data system printout(s) (GC)
B-5
-------
RAS ORGANIC DATA REPORTING FORMS
B-6
-------
0 ta
Ubormorv Mcmc
U6 fampta 10 No
Organic* Analytit Data Sheet
CM* No
CtnnciNo
Ditt MlMM Auihenvd ty
Votetfto Compounds
Concentration UM» Medium ICirctoO**)
Cent/Oil >«e»r
CA»
74 |7 J
74-13 t
75-01-4
7S-00-I
7I-M-2
•7.M-1
7*. HO
7S 31-4
7» 34-3
1»6«OS
7113 3
71-SS-f
S« 23 5
10« 05-4
78 27-4
Vifv»i CM«HO»
AccUKW
1 1 1 -TnenN»ro*tn«n«
•»—••* MC* *x IMI M •
VMM »»i»fc«l«««»h« >'»»"••• ••»H'»«i
»«»•• tOUIkMMW
•>«*> •<•>• (TIM * «• •
CAS
7» 34 5
71 17 $
02 «
7*01-4
124-4«
7«00»
71-41-2
10061 01 4
110-7J »
7S 2S 2
10-t
127 ii-4
<0« If 3
101 »0 7
TOO-41-4
10042 4
112 2-T
1 1
e.» 1
!•«••€«»<*• fttfXWt
fUfrtt I
4 M
Forv I. Organic* Analysis Data Sheet.
B-7
-------
i Ht «W*«. *»»•*• JJJIJ 7OVW7.*MO
Organfca Analy»>a Data
••mtvolatita Compounds
Uw Medium
On* fxncwd/frfc*r*4.
C«nc/Dii Factor
CA*
KM H-2
»2 S3 J
A 1 1 .44-4
9S J7 •
V
211
IS SO
»5«t7
3M3t 32-1
)06-44
•21-M-7
•7-72-1
M »S
7t S»
II 7S-I
'OS-I7»
«S ISO
tit. ft.
120 13 2
12012
»l 20- J
1M-47 I
I7M-3
S» SO 7
tl 57 1
77-47-4
uoe
»S IS 4
St 7
•• 74-4
201 »6 I
99 09 2
H •
••"lyl AlCOAO!
4
2 4.0'mMnviofivnol
2. «-Tr• <:•««• to
4 «4
Pom I.
(eonclau«d).
B-3
-------
P.O.I
Of «••>•• M.i«»i mtOHmt.
• 12113 7O»/I47-J4«0
Organic* Anatyci* O«t» ShMt
(C*cMOrwl
Cone/Oil New
CAS
11 •••17
n».»>.*
U ••••
J0» 00-3
1024.57-3
>$* M«
IO-S7-1
nut
72-20-t
1121 !«&•
72 M«
Hi
1 13-4
1031 -07 ••
(029-3
72-43*
70-S
S7-74.f
W01 34 2
12*74-1 1-2
in 04 21 2
11141-1* S
SJ«6»
12*72 2* «
1tQ*7.*l
110*612 S
AMrm
4 4-OOC
4 4-000
SuNtlt
4 4 -DOT
Mien*
Arader-IOl*
ArociO'-1221
A/eeie' 1232
1]42
A-oew 12*«
Arecter-I2*0
4 *4
Form I.
(continued).
B-9
-------
Of It
•.*•»>*• 21X1 *n/MM4M
Organica Analysis Data Sha«t
y IdwitHM Compound!
CAS
tMXMtMl
«..
• .
«..
ao.
u.
>•..
30.
4 M
Fora I. (continued).
B-10
-------
DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS
For reporting results to EPA, the following results qualifiers are used.
Additional flags or footnotes explaining results arc encouraged. However, the
definition of such flags must be explicit.
Value - If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection
limit, report the value.
U - Indicates compound was analyzed for tout not detected. Report
the minimum detection limit for the sample with the U (e.g., 10U)
based on necessary concentration/dilution actions. (This is not
necessarily the instrument detection limit.) The footnote should
read: U-Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number
is the minimum attainable detection limit for the sample.
J - Indicates an estimated value. This flag it used either when
estimating a concentration for tentatively identified compounds
where a 1:1 response is assumed or when the mass spectral data
indicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification
criteria but the result is less than the specified detection limit
but greater than zero, (e.g., 10J)
C - This flag applies to pesticide parameters where the identification
has been confirmed by CC/MS. Single component pesticides MO ng/ul
in the final extract should be confirmed by CC/MS. *~
B - This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well
as a sample. It indicates possible/probable blank contamination
and warns the data user to take appropriate action.
Other - Other specific flags and footnotes may be required to properly
define the results. If used, they must be fully described and
such description attached to the data summary report•
Form I. (continued).
B-ll
-------
ll
[j
i
i
o
IS
gm
I
1
J
(
•
i
1
i
>
2
—
i
tm m
!>:
in
h
M
II!
1'i
in
• i
h
*
i
t
1
•
1
j
1
•
i
i
5
i
1
1!
«i
!
i
4
j
•
«
ii
80
o
ii
it
H
il
>
i
!
•
:
is
1 *
i |
t
hi
t)
e
u
u
e
b
a
s
-------
i
> i
1
i
i
1
s
i
, u
I
3
!
i
!
j
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
9
3
<
'iii
|l!
in
1!
h
iii
-------
>
s
.
^% A
ttl S
* »
* i
$ I
S w
III
g
*c
«
0.
w «.
M 5
! I
s i
m «
a
HI
•-
1
«
•
•
(.
»
i
i
1
»
:2.2:s.S---
!
•i
P
'8
^s
§
n
.1
. i
•
i lljijl:
1 § i i
i ii| 1 u|
im
8888
n «S^ • 5 SSSSS iill
lilsii;;;;; iill
•• *• •• *•
s.9«s-«M:NM || |
iill
||||
hi-;
>
\
Illl
1 \\\\
tj •""
liL fill
: , ?! l: to 8 1111
iniitiiti! i mi
i::i::!:i:l 3 1 1
g i i I i 1 J6
5 i !
i i •
^
**,
b
w
fcl
. i
! :
5 i
Gt
2
•
»••
•
w
e
-------
I J
e |
o .
M J
i *
A
•
I
M
il
s g
•
«
<
«
1
•
*
i
1
J
!
•E
Is
r
f
•*
P
'i
fr
i
w~
{i
ij
I'
sax
IIS
:• —
* M
jl
S
1
R
1
i|
•
ft
R
|
„
s
2
|
r
|
e
R
r
I
d
5*1
*;*
ft»i
i
]!;
t
ll\
*t
-I
9*
11
8
It
S
ft
8:
*:
ss
J 1
i;
i
"i
«
t
s
.
1
w
R
*
»
i
PI
*
9
i
X
s
X
,
X
9
*
\
«
X
>l
i
?
6|5
rli
iiii
8888
!!!!
•» •* •• •*
jjjj
tin
^IflJ
hu
'ASM MtKtO VAiMEt AM OUTMI OC UMTI
Hi
888
111
111
VII
111
i$£|
i
I
I
h.
o
B-15
-------
10
IU
o
<
IU
!i
\ \
to
M
e
i
B-16
-------
GC/MS TUNING AND MASS CALIBRATION
D«cafluorotrlph«nylpho»phin« {DFTPP)
Cnt No. _. Cmuicm . CMWMI No.
kwrwram 10 .
UfelO
ft4lM_i Autheriad ly:
•A ION MUNPAMCt CRITfMIA
MtLATIVt MUNOMtCt
•1 JD.O
•B.0% tf •_• IN
• _.--.:«-_-•
• •*. • ~*>~ -MMM
f« *•<•
m 40*
•» ua •<-_••
•A •* *_• 1M
w *•«•>> UK •*•»• IN
t« M. M.. 100% -*--,-_-_--.
1M 10 1
LOft •« •_• 1M
77» 10* »J% *f •_• tM
m r-"-m-,i»*^-_..«
441 ir-MX
«. Ml (_• «•• m-m 443
442 rwur «•« 40.0ft •* «•§ 1«
441 1T.O •
a.0% «f MM 449
( )'
( )'
.
( )'
'VMM « >»iKiii-i« • » mmm m.
*V«lu* in ITtfWMM • * ••• 442.
THIS »f MO«M-NCt TUNI »-»Ll«$ TO TM!
UM^LIS. ILAMKS AND STANOAMOS.
IAMTU ID
lAf 10
OATt Of ANALTMS
THM Of ANAkTIll
4/14
Pom V. DFTPP Tuning and MAO. Calibration.
B-17
-------
QC/MS TUNING AND MASS CALIBRATION
Bromof1uorobtnz«n« (BFB)
NO..
Ub)0
Dm
Oru
Comnct No.
Thw
AuthoriMd ly:
•ft lOB AIUWOANCI CMITtNlA
MILATIVf AIUNOANCS
•0
r«
«
M
17J
174
in
17«
177
114 • 40.0% •> M* tmi fwfe
V4 • C.Oft •< «• tan »Mk
••• Mik, 100%. r*Mlt«« Iftufldtnci
U • t « •! tta M» ««k
UB tMn 1 A if *« «•• MU
Or«n* «•« M.0% •«««»•» «Mk
LO • 1 J» •( ««• 174
Or«(t«r flMn H 0*. M MM tfwn 101 .0% •< IMM IT*
Ifl • «J* •< <•«• 171
•
( >'
t )f
( )J
M HrtntlWM 4 * *•• 174.
•» i>t«nO»>n i* * oint !?•.
THIS nMom-»NCl TUMI *» LIU TO THE FOLLOWING
. ItANKS ANO STANOAftOl
•AMTU IO
LA* ID
OATt OP ANALYSIS
TtMt OP ANALYSIS
4/M
POMM V
Form V. IfI Tuning and Mas* Calibration.
-------
Initial Calibration Data
Volatile MSL Compounds
CM* No _
Contractor .
Contract No
10 .
Calibration Data
Minimum UT for *«CC ia 0.300 Mamimum % ftSO tor CCC • 30%
f?
«MO
CCC-
1. 1
Tnn«-
1. 1. 1
1 2-TncM*M1«*n«
2 Mt
4 • M*i»ri • 2 -Ptmtnon*
1.2
MM
CCC.
4 »4
For* VI. Initial Calibration - Volatile HSL Compounda
B-19
-------
Initial Calibration Data
SamivoJatila HSL Compounda
CaMNa _
Cow actor .
Contract Mo:
InstruflMnt
Data:
Minimum M for S»CC«O.OM Manmum % RSO tor CCC ia )0%
"ao
•'•0
•'•0
«MO
CCC"
• Miirw«-0i-
-------
Initial Calibration Data
t»mho
-------
Continuing Calibration Ctock
VoUtJl* HSL Compounds
CM* No.
Contractor:
Contract No:
Calibration Oat*.
Tim*
Laboratory IO
Initial Calibration Owe:
Minimum W lor SPCC«O.JOO Macimum %0 tor CCC • 21%
IO
%0
eee
Vinv* CnMr
Acttan*
1 . 1 •0
-------
Continuing Calibration C^>
30mivolatJK. MSL Compounds
Cttt -fl 1,. ^"*»»itftr» o»tr-
lnatru~»*«i IP' _____ _., ,_ i»mti
Minimum «F for SPCC • O.OftO Max
C«m«OMn4
N.H,treMe,m«.'«»i«m«,
*WnO'
Amlin*
ft>*( 2-Cnie'o«inirilCin*<
2 CMwWwnoi
1 3-0'fie'eefnitnt
1 4-0iiHm.n«
Mt»«C'iM«m«nt
2 4 OiCMOfOO-^no:
1 2 4 T.<*to»ao««*t««
N«oM^*>*n<
4 CniOfMBiiin*
M*t«e«iofgeulM«n*
4 CMO'O 1 Mti"«noi
2 Ci»"o»o»«o«i'<«»'»
2 Nil>e*n>i>n«
0-m«invi »ntn«i«l*
Att-^O-M"**"*
J *»«'««nil.n*
Ac*n*pnitwn«
2 4 0>nn'ae**no'
4 Ni
-------
Continuing Calibration Chock
S«m»vo»*til« HSL Compounds
Cm Mo:
Contractor __
Convict Mo: _
InotnMTWntB:
Calferation D*t*:
Laboratory O:
•MM! Calibration Ovta
MMmumft?tarS»CCitO.M»0 Maximum %0 tor CCC « !•%
H?
•'•0
*o
CCC
SPCC
N-Mrtr«Mdi0rt««>yi*min« 1 1 )
§•«!>*«•
3. 3 .0*ni«»«o««««*n»
J 3
CRC
Por» VII. Continuing Calibration Data - S««i-Volatll«a
B-24
-------
Pasticlda Evaluation Standards Summary
C*«tract t»».,
Laboratory
CehiMn -
Data at Aaalyaia.
•VALUATION CHICK POM LINEARITY
LABORATORY
0
PESTICIDE
ALCMM
CNOMM
4.4'-OOT
OiaUTYL
CMLOMCNDATt
^V'JPcV^
EVAL. wix A
^asvffl011
EVIL, y« •
CALIBHiTig*
tv^We
»MO
(•10%)
f VALUATION CHECK POM 4.4*-OOT/ENOMIN BMEAKOOWN
CNOMM
4,4*-OOT
LAtOHATOHT
10
TMCOT
ANALYSS
PERCENT SMEAKOOWN EXMESSEO AS TOTAL DCG*AOATCN
EVAL. UK B
EVAL. M« f
EVAL. MB S
EVAL. M« B
EVALUATION OP RETENTION TIME SHIFT POM OiauTYLCHLORENOATE
SMO
SAMPLE MO.
LAS
O
THE or
ANALYSa
PERCENT
OlfK*
SMO
SAMPLE NO.
LAS
O
TMEOP
AMALYSM
PERCENT
o*r«
PACKED.«0.»% CAPILLARY
POfttl VIII
Fom VIII. Pttticid* Evaluation Standard* Data.
4/S4
B-25
-------
PESTICIDE/PCS STANDARDS SUMMARY
Caaa N«
Contract No.
Laboratory
OC
•C MatnmaM K>
COMF-OUNO
•Kta-BHC
MU-BHC
atfu-SHC
aiiHw-BHC
Hi»tacM*r
AMfM
Mf UCM»r E»«nat
Cw*****!
OwtrffVI
4.4' -OOC
E«*«
CWtttf'tft Z
4.4--000
CM"* AMafty*
EMtMftl SUfltt
4.4--OOT
MilfNiycMar
C»4rta K«t*«a
T^4w« C^'^^VC nt
•ifM-CM*r
-------
ltf«ntlftcatl«N
Contract N<
«~u
MlMART
«•«•«/
•T or
Tt«TT»TIVt
'SSS71
MUMH
rr OM
CaNTMMlTORT
COLUMM
ITAMMO
•e/M*
CaMTMMCB
(T V U
4/M
Fora X. P**tieidt/PCB Idontification.
B-27
-------
RAS INORGANIC DATA DELIVERABLES SUMMARY
TABULATED RESULTS FOR;
o PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS AND CYANIDE
o INSTRUMENT DETECTION LIMITS
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR;
o MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES AND DUPLICATES
o CALIBRATION FREQUENCIES AND VERIFICATIONS
o PREPARATION BLANKS
o ICP INTERFERENCE CHECKS
o STANDARD ADDITION RESULTS
o LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES
RAW DATA SYSTEM PRINTOUTS FOR;
o SAMPLES
o CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND BLANKS
o MATRIX SPIKE AND DUPLICATES
o METHOD BLANKS
o INSTRUMENT ADJUSTMENTS
B-28
-------
RAS INORGANIC DATA REPORTING FORMS
B-29
-------
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program
Saaple Management Office
P.O. Box 818 - Alexandria, VA 22313
703/557-2490 FTS: 8-557-2490
Date
Lab Name
SOW No.
EPA No.
COVER PAGE
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA PACKAGE
Case No.
Q.C. Report No.
Sample Numbers
Lab ID No. EPA No. Lab ID No.
Comments:
ICP Interelement and background corrections applied? Yes No .
If yes, corrections applied before or after generation of raw data.
Footnotes;
NR - not required by contract at this time
Fora I:
Value - If Che result is a value greater than or equal to the instrument
detection limit but less than the contract required detection limit,
report the value in brackets (i.e., {10]). Indicate the analytical
method used with P (for ICP/Flame AA) or F (for furnace).
U - Indicates element was analyted for but not detected. Report with the
detection limit value (e.g., 10U).
- Indicates a value estimated or not reported due to the presence of
interference. Explanatory note Included on cover page.
- Indicates value determined by Method of Standard Addition.
• Indicates spike sample recovery is not within control limits.
- Indicates duplicate analysis is not within control limits.
• Indicates the correlation coefficient for method of standard addition is
less than 0.995
B-30
-------
Fora I
U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory Program
Sample Management Office
P.O. Box 818 - Alexandria, VA 22313
703/557-2490 FTS: 8-557-2490
LAB NAME
SOW NO.
LAB SAMPLE ID. NO.
I EPA Sample No.
Date
INORGANIC.ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
CASE NO.
QC REPORT NO.
Elements Identified and Measured
Concentration:
Matrix: Water
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6 . Cadmium
7 . Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
Cyanide
Footnotes: For rtpoi
Lou
Soil
Medium
Sludge Other
ug/L or mg/kg dry weight (Circle One)
13. Magnesium
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
Percent Solids (Z)
rting results to EPA,
standard result qualifiers are us<
as defined on Cover Pag*. Additional flags or footnotes explaining
results arc encouraged. Definition of such flags must be explicit
and contained on Cover Page, however.
Comments:
Lab Manager
B-31
-------
Fora II
Q. C. Report No.
LAB NAME
DATE
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION3
CASE NO.
SOW NO.
UNITS
Compound
Metals:
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
13. Magnesium
14. Manganese
15. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Potassium
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Cyanide
Initial Calib.1
True Value
Found
ZR
•
Continuing Calibration?
True Value
Found
ZR
Found
|
a 1
|
|
|
Method4
1
Initial Calibration Source
Continuing Calibration Source
3 Control Limits: Mercury and Tin 80-120; All Other Compounds 90-110
* Indicate Analytical Method Used: P - ZCP/Flaae AA; F - Furnace
8-32
-------
LAB NAME
DATE
Fora III
Q. C. Report No.
BLANKS
CASE NO.
UNITS
Matrix
Preparation
Compound
Metals:
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
13. Magnesium
14. Manganese
15. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Poca«siu»
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Cyanide
Initial
Calibration
Blank Value
Continuing Calibration
1
Blank Value
2 3
*
4
Preparation Blank
i
1 2
%
i
M
*
B-33
-------
Form IV
Q. C. Report No.
ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE
LAB NAME
DATE
CASE NO.
Check Sample l.D.
Check Sample Source
Unit a
Compound
Metals:
1 . Aluminum
2 . Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
13. Magnesium
14. Manganese
IS. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Potassium
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Control
Mean
Limits1
Std. Dev.
i
1
i
True2
i i
t
i
I Initial
Observed
1
IR |
1
i
Final
Observed ZR [
!
1
I
1
1
1
I
* Mean value based on n • .
2 True value of EPA ICP Interference Check Sample or contractor standard.
-------
Fora V
Q. C. Report No.
SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY
LAB NAME
DATE
CASE NO.
EPA Sample No.
Ub Sample ID No.
Units
Matrix
Compound
Metals:
1 . Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
13. Magnesium
14. Manganese
15. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Potassium
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Cyanide
Control Limit
ZR
75-125
M
W
M
-
«
M
M
•«
M *
" .
M
"
"
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
-
-
-
-
Spiked Sample
Result (SSR)
Sample
Result (SR)
Spiked
Added (SA)
ZRl
1 ZR - [(SSR - SR)/SA] x 100
Comments:
"R"- out of control
B-35
-------
LAB NAME
DATE
Fora VI
Q. C. Report No.
DUPLICATES
CASE NO.
EPA Sample No.
Lab Sample ID No.
Units
Matrix
Compound
Metals:
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
5. Beryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
6. Chromium
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
11. Iron
12. Lead
13. Magnesium
14. Manganese
15. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Potassium
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Cyanide
Control Limit*
Sample(S)
•
1 Duplicate(D) ( RPD2
* Out of Control
1 To be added at a later date. 2 RPD - [|S - D|/((S
NC - Non calculable RPD due to value(s) less than CRDL
D)/2)J x 100
B-36
-------
Fora VII
Q.C. Report No.
LAB NAME
DATE
INSTRUMENT DETECTION LIMITS AND
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
CASE NO.
LCS UNITS
ug/L
ag/kg
(Circle One)
Compound
Metals:
1 . Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
Required Detection
Limits (CRDL)-ug/!
200
60
10
200
5. Berylliumj 5
6 . Cadmium
5
7. Calcium 5000
8. Chromium 10
9. Cobalt
10. Copper
50
25
11. Iron 100
12. Lead
5
13. Magnesium) 5000
14. Manganese
15
15. Mercury 0.2
16. Nickel
40
17. Potassium) 5000
18. Selenium
5
19. Silver 10
20. Sodium 5000
21. Thallium 10
22. Tin
23. Vanadium
24. Zinc
Other:
Cyanide
40
50
20
10
Instrument Detection
Limits (IDL)-ug/!
ICP/AA Furnace
1
1
Lab Control Sample |
True Found ZR |
II
i
i
I
• i
i
!
I
1 1
i
I
I
I
i
|
1
-------
Fora VIII
Q.C. Report No.
STANDARD ADDITION RESULTS
LAB NAME
DATE
CASE NO.
UNITS
1 1
1 Sample t \ Element
1
1
1
1
1
!
1
1
1
1
1
!
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 ADD | 1 ADD
ABS. | CON. /ABS.1
1 1
! 1
I ' I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 ADD
CON. /ABS.1
3 ADD
CON. /ABS.1
FINAL |
CON.2 |
I
I
1
1
1
r* 1
•
* CON is the concentration added, ABS. 1* the Instrument readout in *b§orb*nce or
concentration.
* Concentration as determined by MSA
*"r" is the correlation coefficient.
+ - correlation coefficient is outside of control window of 0.995.
BOS
-------
Form IX (Quarterly)
Instrument Detection Limits
Laboratory Name,
Oat*.
, ICP/Flame AA (Circle One) Mod«< Number,
Furnace AA Number,
Element
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. Barium
0. Beryllium
f. Cadmium
7. Calcium
•. Chromium
t. Cobalt
10. Cooper
11. Iron
12. Lead
Wavelength
(for ICP/Fleme AA) or •
F (tar Furnace AA) behind the IOL vahaa.
Indicate elements commonly run with backqround correction (A At with a B behind the
analytical wavelength.
rf more then one ICFVFIam« or Furnace AA is used, submit separate Forma IX-XI for
each instrument.
Comments:
Lab Manager,
B-39
-------
Form X (Quarterly)
ICP Interelement Correction Factors
Date
ICP Model Number.
Inatyte
Xrttimony
•senic
'ariurn
tP/llium
admium
Chromium
obalt
Topper
Jiw
"anganese
4ercury
ickel
'otassium
alanium
''lv«r
lodium
•>allium
•i
in.idium
;ic
Analyte
Wavelength
(nm)
I
Interslftmant Correction Factors
for
Al
Ca
Fe
:/g
.
its:
B-40
Lab Manager
-------
Form X (Quarterly)
ICP Interelement Correction Factors
Laboratory ,
Date.
ICP Mod*! Number.
Analyte
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
A style
Wav alength
(nm)
Jmerslement Correction Factors
for
4
. ~
M
I
*
Comments:
Lab Manager.
-------
Form XI (Quarterly)
ICP Linear Ranges
Laboratory Name.
Oat*.
Modal Number.
Uppar ICP Linearity Limits
Anaryto
1. Aluminum
2. Antimony
3. Arsenic
4. larium
6. ieryllium
6. Cadmium
7. Calcium
8. Chromium
9. Cobalt
1 0. Copper
1 1 . Iron
12. Lead
Integration
Time (Second*)
Concentration
(ttg'U
Analyie
13. Magnetium
14. Manganese
15. Mercury
16. Nickel
17. Potassium
18. Selenium
19. Silver
20. Sodium
21. Thallium
22 Tin
23. Vanadium
24 Zinc
Integration
Time (Seconds)
Concentration
Oifl'L)
Footnotes.
• Indicate elements not anelysed by ICP with the notation NA.
Comments:
Lab Manager.
B-42
-------
RAS DEOXIN DATA OELIVERABLES SUMMARY
SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE, INCLUDING:
o TABULATED RESULTS OF 2,3,7,8-TCDD ANALYSES
o SELECTED ION CURRENT PROFILES (SICP) AND SPECTRA FOR
TCDD ANALYSES
o TABULATED RESULTS OF INITIAL CALIBRATION ANALYSES
o SICPs, RESPONSE FACTORS, CALIBRATION CURVES, AND
QUANTITATION REPORTS FOR INITIAL CALIBRATION ANALYSES
o SICPs FOR PERFORMANCE CHECK SOLUTION ANALYSES
o SICPs FOR CONTINUING CALIBRATION SOLUTION ANALYSES
o MS DOCUMENTATION FOR CONFIRMATORY ANALYSES
o CHRONOLOGICAL LIST BY INSTRUMENT OF ALL ANALYSES
PERFORMED
B-43
-------
RAS D10XIN DATA REPORTING FORMS
-------
r S
! 5
!
I
• \
=r
u> .
.' I
si s
(ft. »
*5
=
§
$
* I
s i
1 S
"
]
SI
tig
•• v B
-------
FORM B-2. INITIAL CALIBRATION SU*
-------
FORM B-3. CONTINUING CALIBRATION SUMMARY
teas.
ID
Sol.
Date Time ID
Peak Area (or Height)
320 322 323 328 332 334 Native
Mean
RF
Native
Meas. Mean
Rt RF
Surr. Surr,
TCDO
Isoners
Hesclut'r
Solution ID Codes:
PC
CC1
OC2
CC3
OC4
CCS
Performance check solution
Concentration calibration solution fl * 0.2 ng/ml
Concentration calibration solution 12
Concentration calibration solution 13
Concentration calibration solution 14
Concentration calibration solution 15
1.
5.
.0 ny/ml
.0 ng/ml
20.0 ng/ml
40.0 ng/ml
Rev: 5/84
-------
FORM B-4. TCDO DATA REPORT - PARTIAL SCAN CONFIRMATION
Response Ratios % Relative Abundances
Spl. (relative to
-------
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION
C-l
-------
* I f
< f ^
& "5
i I
t i i
n 5 2
1 * =
51 I
3-3 ^ *
•^ tT n »/
rl I I
7 jj £ £
r* * =
u
1
'u
e
I*-" tl •" c
ll |l 11
MX *l5 « *
5 "5. i v u. "5. "S.
J« E* Li f 6
e
>.:
«.
i
1
s
J
i
^
<=|
~1
|5j
1
If5
c >_
,8| 4^
^
I
9 t
|1
if
» il
|I
1>
•S
Routine Analytical
Services Required
•
I Full HSL Organic*
1 VOA Fraction Only
1
|
£
f
*
1 t>esticide/PCB Fraction Only
1 Dtoxin Only
| HSL Metal* * Cyanide
1
a*
i
_j
X
I
I
L
S
1
5
0
o
5
2
4
>
2
s
f
•w
i
i
*
*
£
**
I
|
'5
Special Analytical Servkes Ret
^
V
1
II
l~
Ji
Z r
7-. *
^5 *
^ , *
j|
= c
uiHiTiilt.il)
i
< S
£ f
* £
2 5
II
|
u
VibmitUI Staluv
(Current, lt 2 or 1 Month Projr
i.
3
f
X
|
O
fe
5
£
Submitted By*
4-
c
•"
<
^
•t
- !'
j '
^
6
>r
rvtte NOIificalion Received By
C-2
-------
CO
UJ
UJ
i
UJ
§
UJ
CO
o
to
UJ
CO
*'! • E
<
0
<
to
K\
X
X
-------
OJ|
oo
X
CM
O
X
CM
UJ
d
CEZ3
CUD
?>»
g
C/9
'd
UJ
ys
•
co [3
-
-------
••B
g
»
X
ic
X
to
CO
iO
£
5
I
ID
CO
*?3
^ UJ
CO CO
CO
C-5
-------
CO
a.
UJ
CO
I CO
s?
"* CO
X
CM
Ctf
i
UJ
to
to
CO
CO
CO
UJ
£2!
t-> —J O
3
^
-------
i
i
Si
c/>
eo
x
3d
oo
UJ
g
«ZD
-------
UJ|
£
CJ
oo
lew
UJ
cog
00
oo
CM
C-8
-------
U.5. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CLP Sample Management Office
P.O. Box SIS - Alexandria, Virginia 22313
Phone: 703/557-2490 - FTS/557-2490
SAS Number
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Client Request
Regional Transmittal
Telephone Request
A. EPA Region/Client:
B. Representative:
C. Telephone Number:
D. Date of Request:
Please provide below description of your request for Special Analytical Services
under the Contract Laboratory Program. In order to most efficiently obtain
laboratory capability for your request, please address the following considerations,
if applicable. Incomplete or erroneous information may result in a delay in the
processing of your request. Please continue response on additional sheets, or
attach supplementary information as needed.
I. General description of analytical service requested:
2. Definition and number of work units involved (specify whether whole samples
or fractions; whether organics or inorganics; whether aqueous or soil and
sediments; and whether low, medium or high concentration):
3. Purpose of analysis (specify whether enforcement, remedial action, etc.):
it. Estimated date(s) of collection:
. Estimated date(s) and method of shipment:
C-9
-------
6. Approximate number of days results required after lab receipt of samples:
7. Analytical protocol required (attach copy if other than a protocol currently
used in this program):
8. Special technical instructions (if outside protocol requirements, specify
compound names, CAS numbers, detection limits, etc.):
9. Analytical results required (if known, specify format for data sheets, QA/QC
reports, Chain of Custody documentation, etc.) If not completed, format of
results will be left to program discretion.
10. Other (use additional sheets or attach supplementary information, as needed):
11. Name of sampling/shipping contact:
Phone:
Please return this request to the Sample Management Office as soon as possible to
expedite processing of your request for special analytical services. Should you
have any questions or need any assistance, please call us at the Sample Manage-
ment Office.
C-10
-------
SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION
C-ll
-------
jampi* Stfnter
ORGANICS TRAFnC BEPORT
Cue Number:
Sample Site Name/Cod*:
SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
(Cheek OMI
Lew Concentration
Medium Concentration
SAMPLE MATRIX
(Check On*)
Water
Soil/Sediment
Ship To:
Ann
Transfer
Ship To
(£ Regional Office
SampUng, Personnel
.Name
iPhone
Sampling Date.
) For each sample collected specify number
of container* used and mark volume level
on each bottle.
Number of
Cont&ners
Water
(Extract able)
Water
(VOA)
^* Shipping Information
Name of Gamer
Date Sh;ppeo
Airbui Number
Soil/'Sedunent
Water
(Ext'VOA)
Other
Sample Deecnpbon
j Surface Water Mixed Media
Ground Water Solids
j Leachate Other (specify).
I O Special Handling Instruction* •
Approximate
Total Volume
Sample Location
C-12
-------
US IKVIROW«QnALPfKmjCTION AGENCY HW1 Songfe ttauyauaa
ORGANICS TRAfTlC RD^ORT
(T) Ce»e Number:
Sample Sit* Nairn/Coda;
Ottoe.
Sampling Personnel
(Phon*
Sampling Date:
(End
0 Shipping Lniornvtbon
Nome ol C&mer
Date Shipped
AubUl Number
0 SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
X Low Connntration
- Medium Concentration
SAMPLEMATRDC
(CtMckOn*)
Water
Soil/Sedunant
PA
Atm 7cT£> THE.
Transfer
Ship To.
© For e*ch aampla collected apecify number
of oonUinan uaed and mark volume lerel
cm e*ch bottle.
Number of
Conuuners
Water
(Extraetable)
Water
(VOA)
Soil/Sediment
Water
(Ect/VOA)
Other
Approximate
Total Volume
D Sample Description
Surface Water Mixed Media
_}£ Ground Water Solids
I
Leachate Other (tpeory)
Sample Location
SpeciaJ Handing ln»truction«-
<« 5 ul**v pieca jn=n
I,
' *•
C-13
-------
,-«•••»,
INORGANICS TRAFFIC REPORT
Sampl* Sit* N»nw«/Cod«
) Sampling Otec*..
SampUn; Personnel
(Phcn«' ____
Sunpung O«i«
Sampl* Description
. Surtir* VJt-.tt
. Gr;ur.i-*;*i»t
. Kin*: M«ai«
. Cnn»t __^__^_
0 SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
IdMCkOiM)
— —^ Low CannoDtoen
• y,t±uK Csr.itnntaon
© SAMPLE MATRIX
(Check On*)
(T) Shipping Iniorm»tion:
, Mark Velum* L*»*l
On Sample Bottl*
1 T«. : & 2
MATCHES C?CA'."C 3AV.?LE N?
c-u
-------
US I3AOK)Mfl>nALPHCrnXrnON AGENCY
INCmGANICS TRAFITC REPORT
m CAM NumWr .
C*jnpl* Sit* Nun*/Cod*.
fcrnplmg P*r»onn«l
«*CU»l
1 6
(?) SAMPLE CONCENTRATION
•
Low Cane»ne*aen
——•» Mcdiua Conc«no«non
0 SAMPLE MATRIX
vx (Ch»ei On«'
—i— W.t.t
(i) Shipping Information:
Nunt Of C»m»i
D*» : s, ;
' «_. T*J» ? A.T..TCRJ4
f 1
20_|
A . 4
r.T.' " '• i
Lot
C-15
-------
i Caw Number
Sample Site Name/Code.
FIELD SAMPLE RECORD
Field Sample Deecripbon:
_ Arjscus Louad
• '
Ship To:
Attrv
Known or Suspected Hazard*:
Sampling Pvnonnel
SampbziQ Dvte;
£,. Shipping Information:
Preparations Requested
'check be-owi
Sample Volume:
. Ctganxs
' Vc il^T C™^STJ2
A- ~ • — • ••
_. Inorganics
~'
Special Handling Initrucbonc
SMOCopy
Sample Locabon.
C-16
-------
US BHVBCNMOIWL WOIH-'ITON MZNCY OP
FIELD SAMPLE RECORD
^ Case Number
i Sample Sue Name/Code
^ F*ald Sampk Daaenption.
*Drurr.
c - __
_ 3o.c"
_0.
_ Other
Ship To-.
C.
Amv
; C°
i Sampling Ottoe.
Sampling Pvnormel:
•, n Anm*,lc
Known cr Suspected Hazards:
O' /y
liquid
t>&*-
Sampling Date:
-oecr.j
Preparations Raquactad
•check beicw,
lume: T
C Z. -
| £. Shipping Information:
.X Orgarucs
•f Edse"? ^ejri AT.-
a.T« « C4.TST.
y Inorganxs
X !-£.".•'.••*£
XToti'.'-rrjrv
ror.o sc -.CKS
"
Sample Location:
/? 7^29
i Spacaa] Handling Instructions:
SMOCopy
C-17
-------
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program
Samoi* Manageitnt p«ice
PO Bo«8'8 Aiciano"* Virginia 22313
CASE NO:
1 BATCH NO:
FTS 8-557-2490 703 557-2490 CLp O|OX|N SH,pM£NT RECORD
S-ie Name Samp ir.g Cn-ct
'
C'i> ft Siate , C't» ft S:ate
:
EPA Stie Nc Samp ^5 Contact
LaniuM , iiamei
. Samoxno 3ate
LOno-t-o.
T*r 1 2 3 * 5
(C-'Ct« 3T«)
1
6 7 ;D*'*Tu-na
Sr..C To FOR LAB USE ONLY j
Sate Samp.es Rec d i
•
Date S*'DDea Rece>vea By
T-a-i-e- To . Date Sam? es Rec 0
Dale Sf'Speo Rece'vea By
AOOL
M»r«II OCSCKITION AMALTtlS
ViMH.1
ttUMSIKS
l| !
!
!
,
:
1
1
* ' S5 • 2«
1 «|ii
'
,
.
,
i
i
' i i :
1 ; ,
; 1
i i
SMCW
(SASONiri
SAMPLE CONDITION
Oh HCCtl'T
WHITE
-, YELLOW =••
PINK i i! C ?>'-B, -• «MO COLD- .\-CM-.
C-18
-------
S«mpie Maiagement 0"'Ce
PO Boi 818 Alexandria Virgin 22313
FTSe-SS7-2«90 703557-2*90 CLP DIOXIN SHIPMEI'
"T^nr ^llVTc- -EL.
C-ty » State _ C.ty & State
C;*Y»"*A(V>* • HO i lit. oS as CVv^ , KS
EPA S.ic No Sarfp •"« Co-:act
laMufle ; (name)
f CU^A *JU*nJi
T*-0 2 3 « 5
tt^ U - 11
6 ^ .D*'a '-'""
__.^0/C2.
A C** O O^ / & ^
^ fr OC C1 / O^
t&-ccc/cr
^6-POO^Ct
btr COO/Ol
i C- OCC / C F
fcfc- OOO ( Ocoi i r"
I>CrC?CC//U
bo-ooo//f
6CrOOO//f
bCr OOO//«?
b^-OOCTZo
b^-oe-o^ii
bCr OOOlii-
feCrOCOfU
bCr CX?0/ » ^
ON "tCt.'T
tmrre-SMO Ceor TH.tOW-*«9«n Cepr HMX.—LK Cooy »• «*U«m » SMO OOtO—CM COOY
C-19
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENT At PROTECTION AGENCY
CLP Sample Manjgeme-vi Ollice
P.O. BoiliJ - AJeMnSria, Virginia 22313
Phone: 703/337-2*90 - FTS/337-2»90
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE
PACKING LIST
SAS Number
Sampling Office:
Sampling Contact:
(name)
(phone)
Sampling Dated):
Date Shipped:
Site Name/Code:
Ship To:
Attnj
For Lab Use Only
Date Samples Rec'd:
Received By:
1.
2.
3.
*.
3.
6.
7.
S.
11.
'*•
13.
U.
17.
IS.
19.
20.
Sample
Nunbcrj
Sample Description
Lc-, AnaiyiU, Matrix, Concentration
Sample Condition on
Receipt at Lab
Par Lab Itee Only
White - SMO Copy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SMO, Gold - Lab Copy
C-20
-------
PROTECTION
CLP Sample Management Olf.ce *** Number
P.O. BoitlS • Alexandria, Virginia 2231)
Ptwme: 703/557-2*92 - FT5.'557-2*»5
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE
PACKING LIST
Sampling Office:
JZT £a.>la!
Sampling Contact:
(name)
(phone)
Sample
Ntvnben
2. - -3.
v3. " -3
*. '• -y
5. " -T
4« '' ~£
7. '• -7
Sampling Date(s): Ship To:
S~5$C> /*/«.'- jAa.// -r^
Date Shipped:
*•/*.*/£* ftrrtLda., CO 60002.
Site Name/Code:
£UA"P/ OCO Attn: Teiv <*/A.iCr*-'1ft
Sample Description
Le^ AnaJyiis, Matrix, Concentration
" " "' '" " (i-^v^/
* .. '• » ; •*t-j*£i2.
« " '• " " ^-Jf-*
/tffdtisni OC / / niA&Jl4Zt$ ff ff {.^Jty^^l
tt ft ft n ^ *^£— *?V^^
" •• " " " *£-31Sl
For Lab Use Only
Date Samples Rer'c:
Received By:
Sample Condition on
Receipt 11 Lab
i
». - -f " " '• " " *^-^yjT7
». " -9
10. " -/C
11. " -//
12. " ./i
13. " -/?
1*. " -/¥
15. '• -IS
U. " -y^
17. " -/7
U. " -If
19. •• -/9
20. " -Jto
AJ^iu^ Jc- / ffr.±/«s>': ff.B " ^-3f^S
«' * " ^.-Jfrfj
" " " *t-ja/«J>'S ff " *t-3Vtl
* * "^ " *%-J«t3.
" " " " " *k-m3
MpdiUiAt o<5''/ fffltLfisSf- ff I- i£~^Y£7
* ff fv # * ^P- •*?y^ ^
tledtifr* JTciV X?^A/e
-------
Custody Sial
•IBQ
;
i!V3S
\
^ ''<. CUSTODY SEAL
r f* a g-a.g'fa
Date
T*|
frwcCM. ,ul».Nfc U.-S^/T
w»> 3 /o ce f H w iu
n.«Hio.o 5$-i/^J r-zr^
"~ 1
~ J
i
1
*MSC7?^;^ ^tilikiL
Spti ^ spoo^ M. »/
? ^f irinri
a * I ji* •*•'** ^
^ *P 11*111
Z I t 5 i 5
O ^ i
uj w •£ !
—
J
• ^
£
1
ri
!
Dm* | Otftwr.
100 1 I c««.
«P.«
I
V
C
1
t4«
4
T^
I
ll«/l
w*
*
|
\
A
K%<
&c%
r §
g
V Ti * i ?\JC.X X^ i i i
M^MH
|
M
!A
*£,
r?
OS
z &
* 5
5"
>».
i
i
O
•
§
: i
t
&EPA G
UNfTCO STATES ENVIRONMENTAL
PftOTECHOH
•^^
AGENCY
C-22
-------
O
§
ui
C
I
O
w 5
U
E
li
_i ^
il
s°
I
-%
j
I
1
j
*•*-
1
1
6
|
i
C33
-------
l\
u \:,
u
ll
>» N
ft cr
1 <>
I s
n
4M03
xl
ol
0
i
^
'8
8
^
a
.8
0'
\
a
I
v
*^
i
i
f 5
-------
SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT
C-25
-------
a:
UJ
UJ —
Q. *-
Z Z
m < o
Z m u
u Q t-
UJ Z
t- in uJ
Z O Z
— _) CL
< U —
a z z
UJ U Z
uj m »/>
in < UJ
_l -1
x a. t-
u »-
< a O
Q. o co
a:
o
in
UJ
X
U
UJ
U
UJ
o o
o
a in
< a
O uj
CD Z
a <
Sz~
O i/>
fci t^) UJ
in -J
DZ a
< Z
t- O <
o
z
I —
Z *
O U
z <
o,
X
— z
a
c
a < f
UJ
Z Z
< z o
a. o
_
a a.
> —
•- z
— w to
in I
tn a
2$
UJ CD
f- < UJ
Z % m
O UJ 3
u -J
CO »-
D — -J O
z «- < r
3 in — ^
O 3 « O U
a co iu o <
a: z »- ^ o.
D O <
en u Z
< O
_( —
a. _i
z a
* o
a o
o o
a a
UJ UJ
a. o
< z
a. n
ex. o
»- so
•
O
Z
u <
O in
O
L2 >•
UJ O
tf\ ^~
O m
_J D
O U
•
00
cr>
QC
UJ <
-) UJ
a. -J
Z u
— m
-i o
-j m <
< a CD
UJ
UJ Z U
vn — —
O < •-
_i t- m
u z <
C-26
-------
i
CO CD
CO
ae.
ex.
Q_
CO
CO CO
CO
i
CO
o co
Q_
co
o_
CO
«C uj •—
CO
CO
UJ
o
LkJ
CO
UJ UJ
CD » CO
Q. ce:
O H-
O «C
•• CO
OQ UL.
t-J cj —en
H- u. z
UJ UJ •— •
CO
CO
CO
o
CO
eo •—*
Q. ex. >
co co
%
11 if 11
^"^ LiJ ^^
uj esc uj
z: »
o co
o
H^
uj co —»
« uj o_
UJ CO
CO
-
Q_ O
z: u_
CO —
U_ 2E CC CD Qi __)
as o uj zi o uj
•— CJ tt. CO U_ £3
C-27
-------
CO
UJ
o
CO
co
CO
•^j ^X»
I 5
3* c
^^J ^^^
c o
•c ^
= 5
i i
o
a
o ±>
CO I—
~^
°^
ee o
UJ «
t— CO
CO
UJ
o
co
>-
s
a:
o
D_
to
UJ
CO
GC
o
CO
UJ
CO
CO
CO
S3 E
I. I t_ i (_)
H^ I
«C UJ CO
•o
l_J
UJ
on
o
ct:
o
CQ
CO
UJ
a.
co
H^
CO
UJ
to
S
O >-
<-> -1
to
UJ
_J
ca
o
-------
hi Reference to Cue No(i):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Lof
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Call Initiated B>: Laboratory Region
In reference to data lor the folio* ng ja-iple numbeKs):
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
Summary of Resolution:
Signature Date
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
C-29
-------
APPENDIX D
AUXILIARY SUPPORT SERVICES DOCUMENTATION
D-l
-------
SUPERFUND SAMPLE BOTTLE REPOSITORY
DELIVERY ORDER
Date of Order: Type of Order: _
Routine LJ
Fast Turnaround M
Emergency P)
ORDER NO.
«,,»., t*, ^ tdate/ume order called in)
FROM (Name):
Affiliation:
Telephone:
AR Signature:
TO: I-CHEM Research Corporation
23787-F Eichler St. - Hayward, CA 9UM5
Telephone: «15/7S2-3905
Ship the following items for arrival by: (date)
(If applicable) Ship to arrive no earlier than: (date)
REPOSITORY
USE ONLY
Item No. of Items Ko. ol Cases No. of Cases
No. Description Per Case Ordered Shipped
1 SO ounce amber glass bottle 6
2 *0-mL class vial 72
3 1-L polyethylene bottle <*2
* 120-mL wide-mouth glass vial 72
5 16-oz wide-mouth glass jar OS
6 8-oz wide-mouth glass jar 96
7 4-oz wide-mouth glass jar 120
2 J-L amber glass bottle 30
9 32-oz wide-mouth glass jar 36
Ship To:
(provide
street address)
Attention: " — —
REPOSITORY USE ONLY
Type oi Shipment: Complete Order Q Partial Order Q Partial/Completes Order Q
Carrier: A/B, UPS No:
Date Shipped: Signature:
DISTRIBUTION:
White - Repository Copy
Pink - SMO Copy
Yellow - Repository Copy lor Return to SMO
Cold - Requestor File Copy
D-2
Rev;
-------
SUPERFUND SAMPLE BOTTLE REPOSITORY
PACKING LIST
REPOSITORY
1-CHEM Research.
237&7-F Eichler St.
Hayward, CA 9*3*3
Telephone: * 15/782-3903
Delivery Order No.
Type of Order: _
Time:
(emergency only)
DESTINATION (from Delivery Order)
Name:
Address:
To be delivered by:
Telephone No:
The materials listed below have been
shipped as requested.
Date Shipped: ____________
Mode of Shipment:
UPS, BOL, A/B No:
Signature:
Type of Shipment: Q Partial Q Complete Q Partial/Completes Order
Mem
No.
1
2
3
*
3
6
7
8
9
No. of
Cases Lot
Description Shipped NumbeKs)
80 oz. glass
40-mL glass
1-L poly
120-mL glass
. 16-oz glass
S-oz glass
4-oz glass
i-L glass
32-oz glass
QC
Clearance
Number(s)
AUTHORIZED REQUESTOR USE ONLY
Sign below and forward the pink copy to SMO within 7 days of shipment receipt. Keep the
gold copy for your file.
The above order was received by the designee, inspected, and accepted.
Date of Receipt: _^ Requestor Signature:
Send pink PL copy tot
USEPA Sample Management Office (SMO)
P.O. Box 818
Alexandria, Virginia 22313
Distribution: White - Repository Copy
Yellow • Designee Copy
Pink - Requestor Copy for Return to SMO
Cold - Requestor File Copy
D-3
Revs 10/84
-------
0
lu
£
(9 ^ W 2T f*
« < U *• O O
0« tn « x »
Z « ta. *• O —
O »* *• -J taJ KV ^>
w > £ -< r — e
w z : to -
g « w r a o g
Ew w n u
f o a
tft ^ W "
2*2 s^i
W 3 w •• w X
E o -i c a T
2 o Q. w e
Bar « v _
5 « < IK g
5« • a a >-
X • C » B
: ss s
§
X
~
e
i
1
>
w
u
a
u
i
2 i
! E
r r
u
IS
«
w ^
t GC SC(
APPIICM
i S
8 "
e ?
z
u
5
M
X
5
e
^g
u
u X
ii
« >
e u
ft
w
5°
o
Ul
W MJ
!£
ss
IS
•.3
_
•>>
— < u
U
tu
ft
i
^
i
ii
a N
Ik ft
^
ii
IU Mi
VI u>
« a.
X 1 > * 1 1 1 X 1 1
1 1 II II
1 1 1 1 1 1 II
XX.XXXXXXXX
iii^^iiiii:
xxxxxxxxxx
ooooooeooo
fc
S3»3S3 33
ki IM
sx.xvxxxxxx
x *c c e
i iii
55»»;»SRSRR
>
« ««««•« « «
*• ^ * ^ ^ ' ^ $ x
1 I 1 X i i
in » ift e in m
i i ii
iii ii
X X X X X X
*g M w fsl rw «-w
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
X X X X X X
*J •! «J ^t *J «J
o o o e o o
a.
3 S 3 33
X X X X X X
x x x x x x
e o o e e o
X
1
•• «« Ift U1! K »
« *
«« «W M MM
r> • e « « e>
-•<««« « «
D-4
-------
CASE FILE PURGE MATERIALS
Include, but are not limited to:
Sample Tags
Chain-of-Custody Records
Sample Shipment Records
Sample Receipt Logbook Pages
Copies of Internal Sample Tracking Records
Organic/Inorganic/High Hazard Traffic Reports
Dioxin Shipment Records
SAS Packing Lists
Extraction/Preparation Notes
Analysts' Logbook Pages
Instrument Logbook Pages
Bench Sheets
Organic/Ihorganic/Dioxin/SAS Analysis Data Sheets
Standards Analysis Data
Calibration Worksheets
Chromatograms/Spectra
Inorganic Raw Data Printouts
Raw Data Summaries
Correspondence Memos
Document Inventory
-------
SUMMIT
*»HC fir
(!WD) C*U •: JOOO
An<:yt*r«1 inniulltnts.
«'v » u?b, r 1477
ClH'"-of-Cuitody
l>«»n-i'f-ti.s
SAMPLES COUECTEO
DM: 4-8-8?
Jfff Si»rfui
SAMPLES
FEKKAl. EimSS ON:
4-8-82
§Y: Itrry
TO
Su<-fus
SAMPLES RECEIVED
»: An«tyt.r.;
I 8»: «'«.ly A. f'ltkin
>^ Ci^ci *.
^™
D«ti
lOOtiOOk
<*
-------
COUNTV
(S«) CASE «: 1000
•IAHC OF IAK»«T(W: Analytical Consu"inii. Inc.
SAWLE »'s: W9043 to *9UiJ
Cha'n-pf-Custody Record
Chain-pf-Custedy Record
Cha "i.pf.Custody Record
TASK 1 *TAl$
DIGESTION/PREPARATION
ON:
Bv:
4-12-82
Downejr
•nil/its' Bench Record*
TASK I «TALS
MAL^SIS (IT U)
\
3N:4-I9-H2
Joseph
yifl*divi| Boron
4-19-82 I 4-l6-8Z_
*nt«on/ PMior«n«
loriiheet
Analysis D«U Sheet
* Results Tabulation Font
SAWUS COlUCHO
ON: 3-30-82
IT:
Gordon Duncan
TnoMS Smth
SAWLfS KUNQUUHCD TO
fCKKAi. CIrKCSS OR:
4-3-82
IT:
Gordon Duncan
ThoMS
federal Eipress Aira
Analysts' Mncn Record*
TASK II NITALS
ON
•T
4-19-82
Anthony *a1or4fla
IHERCUKT ANAtTSlS
Ok: 4-19-82
: JOMph Nino*
Anthony *aior«n«
Ml PV14IS HOrkShCCl
*(«wr9«nici AnalfSis Oat* Sheet
TASK III «t'AL<
PR£PARATION/0!ST!LLAT!CM
ON: 4-12-B2
8T: N>cn«e' Ooane/
Cyanide ON: 4-12-82
BT: "
-------
OWPE COST RECOVERY CHECKLIST
1. Site Name: 2. State:
3. Site No.:
*. Status: (Check One)
TriaJ Date Set - If yes, please give date:
Filed
Referred to DO3
Referred to HQ
In Preparation Stage in Region
Statute of Limitations Problem
5. Name of OSC or Regional Contact
6. Telephone Number of OSC or Regional Contact
7. Which, if any, of the following FIT contractors were used?
(Circle One)
a. E&E Yes No Dates E&E worked on site:
b. CHjM Hill Yes No Dates CHjM Hill worked on site:
c. NUS Yes No Dates NUS worked on site:
8. Which, if any, of the following TAT contractors were used?
(Circle One)
a. E&E Yes No Dates E&E worked on site:
b. Weston Yes No Dates Weston worked on site:
9. Were any contract laboratories used for analysis work? (Circle One) Yes No
a. Was work done through the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)? (Circle (
No
b. If yes, list applicable Case/S AS numbers and/or CLP sample numbers below.
c. If not, who did work? List name of iab(s) and date(s) of work below.
d. Please list any other names or acronyms ever used in identifying this site:
D-8
-------
10. Which, if any, of the following REM contractors were used?
(Circle One)
a. Black & Veatch Yes No Dates work was done:
b. COM Yes No Dates work was done:
c. Weston Yes No Dates work was done:
d. CHjM Hill Yes No Dates work was done:
e. NUS Yes No Dates work was done:
11. Please provide the following information about any contractors let by OSC:
Aa. Contractor: d. Invoice Nos:
b. Contract No: e. invoice Dates:
c. Dates work was done: f. Invoice Amounts:
Ba. Contractor: d. Invoice Nos:
b. Contract No: e. Invoice Dates:
c. Dates work was done: f. Invoice Amounts:
12. Were any expert witnesses hired? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, were these witnesses hired through either of the following contracts:
(Circle One)
TES Yes No Dates of work:
Life Systems Yes No Dates of work:
13. Were any overflights done? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, give approximate dates of overflights:
1«». Was any work (e.g., evidence audits, sampling) done by NEIC? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, give approximate dates of work:
15. Was any work done by Tech Law, Inc. (Intera)? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, give approximate dates of work:
16. Was any work done by TES? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, give approximate dates of work:
17. Was any work done by IT (emergency response) contract? (Circle One) Yes No
a. If yes, give approximate dates of work:
D-9
-------
IS. Please provide the following information about any other agencies that may have worked
on this site:
Approximate Dates IAG Contact Person Telephone
of Work Number at Agency Number
HHS
DOI
USOG
NOAA
uses
Corps
FEMA
DOD
DOJ
Contract Cooperative
Number Agreement No.
State
-------
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO: Data Review Team
Sample Management Office
FROM:
USEPA Region
SUBJECT: Data Review Request
COPIES:
Please review the data from the following SMO Case:
SMO Case No.:
Site Name:
Lab Name(s):
Sample Information:
A. Number of Samples in Case:
B. Number of Samples to be Reviewed:
(List Numbers if Not All)
C. Organics to be Reviewed? Yes No_
D> Inorganics to be Reviewed? Yes No_
-------
II. User Information:
A. User Organization: _
B. Contact for Questions:
Name:
C.
Type<$) of Review Requested:
Check All
That Apply
QA/QC Compliance
Problem Case
Applications
Consulting
Other
Specify:
D
D
D
D
D. Additional Issues to Address in Review:
Telephone:
Date
Needed
E. Intended Use of Data:
Check All
That Apply
Enforcement I I
Preliminary Assessment I I
Site Investigation I 1
Remedial Action I I
Site Monitoring | |
Undetermined I I
Other II
Specify: \
D-12
-------
F. Comments:
D-13
-------
QA/QC COMPLIANCE REPORT
D-14
-------
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
USEPA Region
FROM:
SMO Data Review Team
SUBJECT: QA/QC Compliance Review Summary for a
Contract Laboratory Organic Data Package: Case No.
COPIES:
As requested, quality control and performance measure for the data packages
noted have been examined and compared to EPA standards for compliance.
Measures for the following general areas were evaluated:
L Data Completeness VL Blanks
II. Spectra Matching Quality VIL DFTPP and BFB Tuning
IIL Surrogate Spikes VIIL Chromatography
IV. Matrix Spikes IX. Holding times
V. Duplicates
Any statistical measures used to support the following conclusions are attached so
that the review may be reviewed by others.
Correspondence Dates;
A. Review Requested
B. Review Authorized
C. Results Available
D. Review Mailed
Action Items:
D-15
-------
Data Reviewed
Case Number:
Site Name:
Laboratory Name{s):
Intended Use:
Conclusions
Compared to existing contract standards, each fraction is found to be acceptable,
acceptable but qualified as noted, preliminary pending verification or unacceptable.
Qualified Prelimi- Un-
Acceptable Acceptable nary Acceptable
Fractions:
A. Volatiles
B. Base/Neutrals
C. Acids
D. Pesticides/PCBs
E. TCDD
Comments and Qualifications: See Text.
Data Prepared By: Date:
Reviewer's Name: Date:
Reviewer's Signature:
Telephone No.:
FTS Line:
Appendices
A. Sample List
B. Summary of Compounds Found
C. Glossary and Data Qualifiers
6/27/8*
D-16
-------
EXAMPLE
APPEKBZX 1: lUWlAXK OF CWffOUKOS FODD
SJH Tritbv If
(-1NV 40.00.
•rrolMr
•rrvlmltrllr
Wnttnt
carton tttrtctilorUt
cMerohtnsehc
),}*41eh]»retth*nc
1 ,1 . l-trUMor«»th»«»
).l-dltMeroeiK»r>»
t.!.2-trirhtoro*ch«n<
chlorottKjnt
l-thloro«thrl»lnyl tthrr
chloreforB
I,l«4lckler»«tlwnc
tr*ni>] ,I-4icMoro«(H*n<
J,?-4ichlere^rai«n<
1 t»ng- 1 , >-d IcMoroproprnt
r !*•! . )-4 »chlero»re(»»n*
•thylhtnsvnr
•rthylmr rhlorldr
th)ero**thifdlchlore«(tS«nt
(luorotrlchleraMtKant
4lchlar»4tfluefe*rth*n<
t «t r»c Meract h»«*
lotvcnc
trichlaro«chmr
vinyl chlerldi
•rrtMi*
e
2
v
X
V
^
x
V
X
X
V
>
e
*«
e
V
X
^
nl
x
X
^
X
K
R
X
e
y
x
^
^
^
x
^c
X
^
x
X
^
^
e
^
^,
^
x
x
x
•^
o
^
X
V
V
V
^
o
V
V
X
V
V
*
9
V
X
y
X,,
/
/
y
9
(^
X,
V
^
ft
c
*
V
x
X
V
/
^
^
*
e
*
V
x
\/
V
X
x
/%
9
«
^
X
V
^
)^
/
V
y
**
^
e
«
V
x
x
X
y
^
x
y
-------
E. SPECTRA MATCHING QUALITY
Spectra Were Examined and Found to be of Good Matching Quality
Some Spectra Were Examined and Found to be of Poor Matching Quality
Remarks:
D-1S
-------
w
ft.
•»
•
1
*• z
C
M
>s C
C ID
V Q£
S
\i *i|l
AC (B >
it «S t*
*t "
i| fc?s
|| jig
fl ^-l
t> t>
^ »0 "2 4) C
1 ^ *• S w
e'5 H K 1
S-s < ~
u-- '•
a «o a
£ a
.1 3 «
i '§•«
1 *€
* ^ * ^
^ ^ &i
s ii |l
1 * « 50
1!
IA M >
^ •= ^
< > ,0 e
i il ^
V) t- S
ts.
• ,
9*
D.-Toluene
I
CM
1
*
Bromofluorobenze
I
9*
CM
1
1
CK-1.2-Dichloroeth
S
J2
,
*
M\
D. -Nitrobenzene
BO
S
i
7
2-fluorobipheny 1
Z
fi
3
1
D,..-D-Terphenyi
Z
a
S
,
o
***
'„
. O
i
•o
2
-
1
*
**"*
2-Fluorophenol
2
o
i
1
2.%.6-Tribromophei
i
*^
o
04
1
O
a
Dibutvlchlorendai
Pesticide
*
*
•o
—
1
Q
O
•
4
t
O
c
M
«
Jk
!
«
a
»
•^
§
j
'•Advisory
D-19
-------
Jo
* e
*
•k
**
i y
* 1
o
u
it
60 ^ e
2 te-2
»> ») i"8 »
*e S>
V ** V
(« ^g*
a» 5 fQ ^ V
.31 O w S LJ
•> u u 5 c
if i1"
IS i «"i
O"" " *• s 5
C — W B6 >J
a s| < ^
jj ^«
S 3 «
SPIKES - WATER SAI
s of the surrogate spi
Values marked with an
Surrogate
Compound
t^ •••
i f* !
i_. « i i
£
,
D. -Toluene
1
^
i
ir\
Bromofluorobenzene
1
8
•
is.
u
Dt-l,2-Dichloroethaiv
1
g
,
—
D. -Nitrobenzene
I
2
1
jf
2-fluorobiphenyl
i
s
1
«•%
D,..-p-Terphenyl
Z
a
o
i
2
1
i
«
. fi
i
1
Is.
.O
I
^
2-Fluorophenol
2
o
i
o
^M
2.* ,6-Tr ibromopheno
i
*
—
I
N*
Dibuty Ich lor enda te
Pesticide
•0
1
«5
I.2.3.*-TCDD
a
c
Remarks}
t
-------
o
I
•o
v o
^ - —
is
2*
»n
Ill
*• a
g*
5'
«-S
D '-
% M
Us
.£ •*
2 BO 4)
PI
I. V
«•'£.
U «S
10 Q
*M
fM
Si
51
la
^«
it
if
t)
11
">.
JC
5
fe
s
u
0
i
-T
S
ji>
T.
£
*«
g
fe
f
L_
H
*
0
N
1
O
&
£
U
u
|
o
H
I
N
55
- ^
2 -g.
E
n
tl
*r -S
i
O •* ^ *» O J5
•^ £ r ? « x
fc 5- .5 J t £ .a w
• c^ls-^-8
§
Jl
8
.4
^ U W B.
"§ 2 » 5 £
2 e s Z .t:
| I V V *
£ C IN a.
D-21
-------
I I I 1 1 1
•3.8
1l I
io*
T>
I
^
§
,3
M
UJ
o. = u
41 n >-
o
I
fM
«M
I
s
i
PC
Iti
.2
I
u
•o
o
o
8
|
» S •§
** •? 2
ill
u
a
-------
•0
I
ra
o
o
M
V
Ei
*i'2
E ^
«l Sfl
p^ fcg^
tl ***
s>
to
g
<
V)
fc E
>M
d.
||
IS
•
^ ^3
ii
i!
It
£ ""
U *
fM
c? E
**
O c V
< I*
S P >
1
4;
^K
Volatiles
1,1-Oichloroeth
g
Trichloroethyle
Chlorobenzene
Toluene
Benzene
-i
|
Base/Neutrals
1,2,%-trichlorob
Acenephthene
S
S a
2,4-dinitrotolue
Di-n-butylphtha
E
0
1
o
Pyrene
N-nitrosodi-n-pi
2
D
N
1,%-dichloroben
Acids
1
Pentach lor ophei
Phenol
2-chlorophenol
"5
p-chloro-fn-cre!
4-nitrophenol
-------
•3J!
,2
fc-S cl
jQ O 6<
«. r r
fc R b!
i ^
o. c
«M
Pesticides
Heptachlor
e
i
<
Dieldrin
* =1
J -r O
2 | i.
J u a.
specified criteria.
f
1
'i
••
|
*
Remarks)
-------
V. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS RESULTS
The relative percent difference (RPD) for each parameter group was evaluated. The
duplicate analysis RPD acceptance criteria should be:
Maximum Acceptable
Fraction Percent Difference
Volatile 15%
Base/Neutral 50%
Acid 40%
Pesticide 40%
The RPDs exceeding the maximum acceptable percent difference were:
Concentration
Compound Actual RPD Sample Duplicate
Fraction:
Volatile
Base/Neutral
Acid
Each duplicate analysis was examined in reference to compounds detected in each
analysis. Those compounds which were not common to each analysis for the duplicate
sample are listed below:
Sample
Fraction Number Compound Concentration
Remarks:
D-25
-------
VL BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS
The blank analysis was reviewed. The contaminents in the blank are listed below:
Fraction Compound Significant
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Remarks:
D-26
-------
YD. DFTPP AND BFB TUNING RESULTS
The DFTPP tuning results were reviewed and found to be within the specified
criteria.
. The BFB tuning results were reveiwed and found to be within the specif ied
criteria.
The (DFTPP/BFB) tuning results were reviewed and the following abundances were
found to fall outside the specified criteria:
Required Actual
Compound m/z Abundance Abundance
The (DFTPP/BFB) performance results which were found to be outside the
contractually-required tuning requirements do not have an adverse technical impact on
the data.
No adverse technical impact.
Adverse impact on data.
Remarks:
-------
VOX CHROMATOGRAPHY CHECKS
Resolution and Sensitivity
Type of Column: Packed Column _ Fused Silica Capillary Column (FSCC)
Packed Column Chromatography Check:
Tailing
Factors
Acceptance
Windows
Actual
Benzidine Less Than 3
Pentachlorophenol Less Than 5
FSCC Chromatography Check:
50-ng benzidine detectable? Yes
Pentachlorophenol response factor? Yes
General shape of the total ion chromatogram:
Acids
Base/
Neutrals
Vola tiles
Pesticides
Peak Shape
Interferences _______
Background
Standards
General shape of the total ion Chromatography:
Base/
Acids Neutrals
Peak Shape
Interferences
Background
Volatiles
Pesticides
Remarks:
D-28
-------
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
USEPA Region
FROM:
SMO Data Review Team
SUBJECT: QA/QC Compliance Review Summary for a
Contract Laboratory Inorganic Data Package: Case No.
COPIES:
As requested, quality control and performance measure for the data packages
noted have been examined and compared to EPA standards for compliance.
Measures for the following general areas were evaluated:
L Data Completeness IV. Blanks
IL Matrix Spikes V. ICP Interference Check
IIL Duplicates VL Calibrations
Any statistical measures used to support the following conclusions are attached so
that the review may be reviewed by others.
Correspondence Dates;
A. Review Requested
B. Review Authorized
C Results Available
D. Review Mailed
Action Items;
D-29
-------
Data Reviewed
Case Number:
Site Name:
Laboratory Name(s)s
Intended Use:
Conclusions
Compared to existing contract standards, each fraction is found to be acceptable,
acceptable but qualified as noted, preliminary pending verification or unacceptable.
Qualified Prelimi- Un-
Acceptable Acceptable nary Acceptable
Fractions:
A, Task I (ICP)
B. Task II (AA)
C Task III (CN)
Comments and Qualifications: See Text.
Data Prepared By: Date:
Reviewer's Name: Date:
Reviewer's Signature: .. . .
Telephone No :
FTS Line:
Appendices
A. Sample List
B. Summary of Elements Found
C. Glossary and Data Qualifiers
6/27/8*1
D-30
-------
V
o
<
3
ft
ft
S
x
x
X
x
x
x
•4
L
y
X
x
X
^^
X
x
x
x
X
n
V
\
I
n
\
\
5
x
X
X
X
x
*^/
r^
x
^^/
?l
3
x
V.
/N,
K
8
X
5?
5*
9
i
IP
3
5
y
x
x
X
x
I
er
x
X
x
X
x
x
n
'
X
x
X
c
i
i
X
X
J
B
;
M
3
i
•
1
3
6
I
x
x
x
x
X
x
X
8
x
X
x
z
JT
z
•
i
x
x
x
X
x
x
X
x
x
x
x
^^
^>
?
i
n
3
•
x
n
x
x
X
X
x
x
X
\
m»
*
?
x
x
x
x
x
1
?
x
x
X
x
1
£
'
*
X
x
^
x
x
x
X
i
,*,
x,
x
^
^
x
x
X
Xj
X
en
f* ^*
> H
09 n
»• ••
^t?
rt i>'
/•.
> r
s c
'n
MT 0001
MT 0002
KT 0003
MT 0004
MT 0005
MT 0006
NT 0007
MT 0008
KT 0009
irr 0010
MT 00 11
VT 0012
CASE: 4000 1
«D
P3
O
M
X
ffi
tn
c
w
r
o
z
D
-------
APPENDIX E
REFERENCES
NOTE: The references in this Appendix are supplied for
general information purposes and do not necessarily
represent methods or procedures utilized in the CLP.
w
\
E-l
-------
ANALYTICAL REFERENCES
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution
Control Federation, Standard Methods lor Examination of Water and Wastewater,
i*th Ed., (1975).
American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31,
"Water", Standard D3223-73, p. 343 (1976JI
Bishop, IN., Mercury in Sediments, Ontario Water Resources Comm., Toronto, Ontario,
Canada, 1971.
Brandenberger, H. and Bader, H., "The Determinatin of Nanogram Levels of Mercury in
Solution by a Flameless Atomic Absorption Technique," Atomic Absorption News-
letter 6, 101, (1967).
EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, Interim
Methods for the Sampling and Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments and Fish
Tissue, Aug. 1977, Revised October 1980.
EPA, Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories,
USEPA-600/W9-Q19.
EPA, Handbook for Monitoring Industrial Wastewater, USEPA Technology Transfer, 1973.
EPA, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater, USEPA Technology
Transfer, 1974.
EPA, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA Pub. 600/W9-02, March
1979.
EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Modification (By Committee) of
Method 3050, SW-S46, 2nd Ed., Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. July 1982.
EPA, Procedures Manual for Groundwater Monitoring at Solid Waste Disposal Facilities,
EPA 530/SW-*!!, 1977.
EPA EMSL, Users Guide for the Continuous Flow Analyzer Automation System,
Cincinnati, Ohio, 1981.
Garbarino, J.R. and Taylor, H.E., "An Inductively-Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission
Spectrometric Method lor Routine Water Quality Testing," Applied Spectroscopy 33,
No. 3, 1979.
GouJden, P.O. and Afghan, B.K., An Automated Method for Determining Mercury in
Water, Technicon, Adv. in Auto. Analy. 2, p. 317 (1970).
Hatch, W.R. and Ott, W.L., "Determination of Sub-Microgram Quantities of Mercury by
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry," Analytical Chemistry frO, 2085 (1968).
F-7.
-------
ANALYTICAL REFERENCES
(continued)
Kopp, IF., Longbottom, M.C. and Lobring, L.B., "Cold Vapor Method for Determining
Mercury," AWWA, VoL (A, p. 20, Jan. 1972.
Martin, T.D., Kopp, 3. F., and Ediger, R.D., "Determining Selenium in Water, Wastewater,
Sediment and Sludge by Flameless Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy", Atomic
Absorption Newsletter 14. 109, 1975.
Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs, Method 608; 2,3,7,8-TCDD, Method 613} Purgeables
(Volatiles), Method 624; Base/Neutrals, Acids and Pesticides, Method 625; Federal
Register, Vol. 44, No. 233, Monday, December 3, 1979, pp. 69501, 69526, 69532 and
69540.
Owerbach, Daniel, "The Use of Cyanogen Iodide (CND as a Stabilizing Agent for Silver in
Photographic Processing Effluent Sample," Photographic Technology Division,
Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York, 14650.
Technicon Industrial Systems, Operation Manual for Technicon Auto Analyzer IIC System,
Technical Pub. 0TA9-0460-00, Tarrytown, New York, 10591, 1980.
Martin, Theodore D., EMSL/Cincinnati, Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic Emission
Spectrometric Method of Trace Elements Analysis of Water and Waste, Method
200.7, Modified by CLP Inorganic Data/Protocol Review Committee.
Winefordner, 3.D., "Trace Analysis: Spectroscopic Methods for Elements," Chemical
Analysis. VoL 46, pp. 41-42.
Winge, R.K., Peterson, V.3., and Fassei, V.A., Inductively Coupled Plasma - Atomic
Emission Spectroscopy Prominent Lines, EPA-600/4-79-017.
Wise, R.H., Bishop, D.F., Williams, R.T.', and Austern, B.M., Gel Permeation Chroma-
tography in the GC/MS Analysis of Organics in Sludges, USEPA, Municipal
Environmental Research Laboratory; Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
SAFETY REFERENCES
Committee on Chemical Safety, Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories, American
Chemical Society Publications, 3rd Ed., 1979.
Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease
Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Carcinogens -
Working with Carcinogens, Pub. No. 77-206, Aug. 1977.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), OSHA Safety and Health
Standards. General Industry. (29 CFR 1910), OSHA 2206, (Revised January 1976).
Wallace, R.A., Fulkerson, W., Shults, W.D., and Lyon, W.S., Mercury in the Environment -
The Human Element. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/NSF-EP-1, p.
31 (January 1971).
E-3
-------
SAMPLING REFERENCES
EPA Environmental Response Team, Field Monitoring and Analysis of Hazardous
Materials, EPA Training Manual, Course No. 165.V, Cincinnati, cmo,
Hjibregtse, K.R., and Moser, 3.H., Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of
t Water and Wastewater, USEPA-600/W6-049, 1976.
V
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, USEPA, Samplers and Sampling Procedu-
res for Hazardous Waste Streams, EPA-600/2SO-01&, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1980.
National Enforcement Investigations Center, Enforcement Considerations for Evaluation
* of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites by Contractors, EPA Office of Enforcement,
Denver, Colorado, 19SO.
Olson, D.M., Berg, E.L., Christensen, R., Otto, H., Ciancia, 3., Bryant, G., Lair, M.D.,
Birch, M., Keffer, W., Dahl, T. and Wehner, T., Compliance Sampling Manual, EPA
Enforcement Division, Office of Water Enforcement, Compliance Branch, 1977.
Weber, C.L, Biological Field and Laboratory Methods for Measuring the Quality of Surface
Waters and Effluents, USEPA-670/W3-001, 1973.
SHIPPING REFERENCES
Federal Express Corporation, Hazardous Materials Department, Telephone: 1-800-238-
5592.
U.S. Department of Transportation, A Guide to the Federal Hazardous Materials
Transportation Regulatory Program, 1983.
U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S> Department of Transportation Regulations, l»9
CFR Parts 100 - 199, October 1, 1978.
E-4
-------
|