U«u«o St»tw                Of»ie« o» rr»r7incv ft            HW-1O  15
                    Environmental Protection        R*mMi«4 RMOonM                 J.U.J.J
                                                    oc 20460      February  1991
                            BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
                      NMTCNAL PRIORITIES LIST,  FINAL RDLE

       The U.S. Divironmental Protection Agency (EPA)  is adding 6 proposed sites
to the final Itetional Priorities List (NPL) and dropping 14 proposed sites from
further consideration.  Of the States and Territories, four are adding sites to
the NPL  in a  final  rule published in  the Federal Register  in  February 1991.
California  and Utah  are adding  two new  final sites each,  and  Illinois and
Maryland one  each.   The number of final sites now totals 1,189  (reflecting 4
deletions noted below), inching 116 in the Federal facility  section.  No sites
remain in proposed status.   This  completes actions on sites proposed under the
original Hazard Ranking System, which was revised on December  14,  1990 (55 FR
51532).  The revised HRS becomes effective on March 14, 1991.

       Of the States and Territories, five have no sites on the new final NPL:
American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,  the District of
Columbia, Trust Territory of the  Pacific Islands,  and the Virgin Islands.  New
Jersey has  the largest number of sites (109),  followed  by Pennsylvania  (95),
California  (90), and New York (83).

       The NPL identifies uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant further
investigation to determine if long-term "remedial action" is  necessary. (EPA is
activating  a  new category on the NPL,  as described  later under "Construction
Corpletion.")   Sites  on the NPL are  eligible  for such  action under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act  (CERCLA),
enacted  on December 11,  1980,  as  amended  by the  Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act  (SARA),   enacted  on October 17,  1986.    SARA  authorizes  a
"Hazardous Substances Superfund" totaling $8.5 billion over 5  years to  pay  costs
not assumed by responsible  parties.   In October  1990,  SARA was extended to
September 30,  1994 to provide an  additional $5.1 billion.  EPA has the primary
responsibility for managing cleanup and  enforcement activities under Superfund.

       This document provides background information on the final rule  and  lists
the 6 sites being added to the final NPL arranged  alphabetically by State.

Deletions

       At the time of the last final NPL rulemaking (55  FR  35502, August 30,
1990), 1,187  sites  were on  the  final NPL.   Since then, four  sites have been
deleted  from the  final NPL because EPA and  the State determined  that all
appropriate response has been taken:

       o   PabBiucn Sand and Gravel, Libertyville, IL

       o   International Minerals & Chemical  Corp.   (Terre Haute  East Plant),
           Terre Haute, IN

       o   Poer Farm, Hancock County, IN

       o   Whitehall Municipal Wells, Whitehall, MI
                                                    U.S. Environ/-.-
                                                    Region 1J, Utr
                                                    77 'West Jacks;-
                                                    Chicago, iL  G.1

-------
Contents of Rul*

       Six sitss are being added to the  final NFL because they have scores of
28.50  or  above on the original HRS,  a  numerically based  system designed to
evaluate the relative risks posed by a site to human health  or the environment.
Fourteen sites are being dropped at this time because  of their HRS scores or
policy issues.

       HRS Scores.  EPA has revised the HRS scores for six sites in the rule based
on its review of comments and additional information developed by EPA and the
States.  For three sites,  the public comments resulted in an HRS score below the
cutoff of 28.50.  Accordingly, these sites  are being dropped from the proposed
NPL at this time:

       o   Comet Oil  Co.,  Billings, MT

       o   Kerr-MoGee Corp. (Gushing Plant), OK

       o   Richardson Flat Tailings,  Summit County,  UT

       RCRA-Related Sites. When the first final NPL was promulgated in September
1983, EPA announced certain listing policies relating to sites that might qualify
for the NPL.  One of  these policies involved facilities  subject to the Subtitle
C corrective  action  authorities  of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA).   EPA's policy was generally not  to place on the NPL,  RCRA  "regulated
units"  (that  is,  land disposal units  that  received hazardous waste after the
effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to  clean  them up under  RCRA.   The RCRA cleanup process and
standards are similar to those under CERCLA,  ensuring that all actions taken will
protect human health  and the environment.  Dropping such sites from the NPL also
preserves  CERCLA resources  for  sites where no  other cleanup authority  is
available.

       In November 1984,  the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments  (HSWA) were
enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under Subtitle
C.  As a result of this broadened authority, EPA revised its policy for placing
non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21109)
announced  that  facilities  subject  to  RCRA  Subtitle  C  corrective  action
authorities would be placed on the NPL if  one or more of these conditions exist:

       o   The facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated an inability
           to finance appropriate corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws.

       o   Thsi facilities have lost authorization to operate (also known as the
           Loss of Interim Status, or LOIS provision),  and there are additional
           indications that  the owner or operator  is  unwilling to undertake
           corrective action.

-------
       o   The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but the owner
           or  operator has  a  clear history  of  unwillingness to undertake
           corrective action.  These situations are determined on a case-by-case
           basis.

       On June 24, 1988  (53  FR 23978)  and October 9,  1989  (54 FR 41000), EPA
announced additional components of the NPL/KCRA policy.  As a natter of policy,
EPA will list four additional categories of RCRA-related sites:

       o   Facilities that were treating, storing,  or disposing Subtitle C
           hazardous waste after November 19, 1980,  but that did not  file a Part
           A permit application by that date as required and have little or no
           history of compliance with RCRA.   EPA believes that these nan- or late
           filers,  although they are technically subject to RCRA, are not likely
           to be cleaned up expeditiously under BORA and so should be on the NPL.

       o   Facilities with permits for the treatment,  storage, or disposal of
           hazardous  waste issued  before  enactment  of  HSWA,  but  will not
           voluntarily modify the  permit.  Pre-HSNA permittees  are not required
           to take corrective action for releases  from solid waste management
           units.   Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not have the authority
           to modify a pre-HSWA  permit for corrective action until the permit is
           reissued.   Many pre-HSWA permits are for  10 years. Since the  last pre-
           HSWA permit was issued prior  to November  8, 1984, it could be 1994
           before  EPA could modify some  permits  to include corrective action.
           In these cases, EPA  believes  CERCLA authorities will result in the
           most expeditious cleanup.

       o   Facilities that filed  a Part A permit application for treatment,
           storage, or rfigpngai  of Subtitle C hazardous waste  as a precautionary
           measure  only.     Such  facilities —   for  example,   generators,
           transporters,  or recyclers of hazardous waste — are not subject to
           Subtitle C corrective action authorities.   These are referred  to as
           protective filers.

       o   Facilities that at one time treated or  stored Subtitle  C  hazardous
           waste but have  since  converted to  generator-only  status  (i.e.,
           facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90 days or less) or any
           other hazardous waste activity not requiring Interim Status.   These
           facilities, whose Part A permit applications have been withdrawn with
           EPA or  State approval,  are referred to as converters.  EPA believes
           it lias  the authority under RCRA  Section  3008(u) to compel corrective
           action  at  such facilities.  However, RCRA's corrective action program
           cunrsntly  focuses  primarily  on treatment,  storage,  and disposal
           facilities  (due to permitting deadlines in RCRA).   Therefore, this
           category should be on the NPL to  ensure expeditious cleanup.  However,
           if a consent order requiring remedial action  is in effect,  a  converter
           need not be listed.

-------
       Four sites in this rule are being dit%%**l fran the proposed NFL
they can be addttaaeed under Subtitle C corrective action authorities:
                     Ground Water Contamination,  Mesa, AZ

       o   Chemplex Co., Clinton/Camanche,  IA

       o   Findett Corp., St. Charles,  MO

       o   Burlington Northern Railroad (Sonars Tie-Treating Plant),  Seiners, MT

       One RCRA site is subject to Subtitle C corrective action authorities, but
the transfer of primary responsibility from CERCXA to RCRA would  likely  cause
delays that could threaten cleanup of the site.  This site is being added to the
final NFL consistent with the intent of the NFL/RCRA policy:

       o   Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (Mountain View Plant), Mountain
           View, CA

       Radioactive Release Sites.  One  site with radioactive releases  is  being
added  to  the  final NFL  consistent  with  tb^  policy for sites  under the
jurisdiction  of the  Nuclear Regulatory Conmission (NRC)  because NRC cannot
address the contamination:

       o   Kerr-MoGee (Kress Creek/West Branch of DuPage River), DuPage County,
           IL

       Pesticide  Sites.    Six of  the  sites addressed in  this rule  involve
contamination  that  appears  to  result,  at  least  in  part,   from  the  f.e.d
application  of pesticides that  are  registered  under the Federal
Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act  (FIFRA).   The Agency  is ir.  t_K.e
process  of developing  a general  strategy for  addressing  contamination from
agricultural chemicals  in  ground water under FIFRA.  It would be premature  to
make a final  decision on  these sites  until that broader strategy,   and  its
relationship with the Superfund program, have been determined.  Therefore,  these
six sites are not being added to the NFL at this time:

       o   Kunia Wells I, Oahu, HI

       o   Kunia Nells H, Oahu,  HI

       o   nn\mm Shaft, Oahu, HI

       o   WaipalBi Wells, Oahu, HI

       o   Waipio Heights Wells II, Oahu, HI

       Health Advisory site.  One site  in this rule was  proposed in the basis of
a health advisory issued by the Agency  for Toxic  Substances and Disease Reg i SUP/
(ATSER).  ATSCR has rescinded the advisory because the contaminated soil  at tne
site has been excavated.  Hence, this  site is being dropped from the NPL:

           o    Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit, MO

-------
 Construction Completion


       The Prwnble to the NCP announced EPA's intention to create "Construction
Completion" am a nev category of the NFL.  The category consists of:  (1) sites
awaiting deletion;  (2)  sites awaiting  deletion but for  which CERdA Section
121 (c) requires a five-year review of the remedy; and (3) sites undergoing long-
term remedial action.  EPA established this category to better connunicate to the
public the status of cleanup progress among sites on the NPL.   EPA is activating
the Construction Completion category of the NPL by identifying 14 sites that have
satisfied  the requirements for  listing in this category.   EPA  has approved
Interim or Final Close-Out Reports for each site.  The Close-Out Report provides
a brief demonstration of how the implemented remedy at the site satisfies the
technical and other requirements.

       The sites listed  in the Construction Completion category are:


       Sites Awaiting Deletion:

       o   Jibboom Junkyard, Sacramento,  CA
       o   Big River Sand Co., Wichita,  KS   *
       o   Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co.,  Minneapolis, MN

       Sites awaiting  first  Five-Year  Review   following  achievement  of  the
remediation levels specified in the Record of Decision:

       o   Celtor Chemical Works, Hoopa,  CA
       o   LaBounty Site,  Charles City,  IA
       o   A.L.  Taylor (valley of Drums),  Brooks, KY
       o   Newport Dump,  Newport, KY
       o   Taylor Borough Dump,  Taylor Borough,  PA
       o   Independent Nail, Beaufort, SC
       o   Triangle Chemical Co., Bridge City, TX
       o   Northern Engraving Co., Sparta, Wl

       Long-term Response Actions:

       o   Mid-South Wood Products, Mena,  AR
       o   Alpha Chemical Corp.,  Galloway, FL
       o   Chisnan Creek,  York County, VA

-------
Two
                      publications relative to this final rule are available:
in
                          1991.  Publication HW-8.27.
                                                              For a  single free
                copy, contact EPA's Public Information Center (PIC) , PM-211B, 401
                M St. SW,  Washington,  DC 20460, telephone  202-382-2080.
         National  Prior iti
                                                                     Suon
         Materials
                                   IQQI.  Publication HW-10.15S.  Available from
                PIC.

       Descriptions of all proposed and final NFL sites are now contained in eight
documents:  HW-8.27 (just issued) plus these seven previously issued documents:

           o    Descriptions of 106 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities
                List  in August 1990.   Publication HW-8.25.   Available from PIC.
         List in
                                                  the Final National Priorities
                                       Publication HW-8. 23.  Available from PIC.
           o    Descriptions of 29 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities
                List in November 1989 .  Publication HW-8. 21.  Available from PIC.

           o    Descriptions of 93 Sites Placed on the Final National Priorities
                List in September 1989.   Publication HW-8. 19.  Available from
                PIC.

           "O    Descriptions of 101 Sifr^s Placed on the Final National Priori ti*3^
                     in Ma-rrfi 1989.   Publication HW-8. 15.   Available from PIC.
                Descriptions of 272 Sit^s Placed on the Final National Priorities
                Ifii?t,  ],985-87.  previously, these descriptions were available in
                two documents.   They have been  compiled  into one document as a
                convenience. Publication HW-8. 10/8. 11.   Available from PIC.

                Descriptions of  Sites  on  Current National Priorities  List.
                October 1984 (Descriptions of 538 sites placed on the final NTL
                in 1983-84).  Publication HW-8. 5.  Available from the National
                Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, telephone
                703-487-4650.  Accession No.  PB85-224756.   Cost is $53 per copy,
                $8 in microfiche, plus $3 handling fee per order.
       Publications HW-8. 26, 10.14, and 10.14S are obsolete and may be discarded.

-------
NPL
Rank  St
                     National Priorities List,
                    New Final Sites (by State)
                          February 1991
Site Name
City/County
1007  CA   Fairchild Semiconduct (Mt View)
 614  CA   Spectra-Physics,  Inc.

 524  IL   Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek)

 575  MD   Anne Arundel County Landfill

 394  UT   Midvale Slag
 205  UT   Wasatch Chemical  Co.  (Lot 6)
                                       Mountain View
                                       Mountain View

                                       DuPage County

                                       Glen Burnie

                                       Midvale
                                       Salt Lake City
 Number of New Final Sites:

-------
                    National Priorities List,
                Final Sites Per State/Territory
                        (by Total  Sites)
                         February  1991

State/Territory
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
California
New York
Michigan
Florida
Washington
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio
Texas
Massachusetts
South Carolina
Missouri
North Carolina
Delaware
Iowa
Virginia
Kentucky
Colorado
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Tennessee
Georgia
Alabama
Kansas
Louisiana
Rhode Island
Utah
Arizona
Arkansas
Maryland
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Idaho
Maine
Puerto Rico
Montana
Oregon
Vermont
AlMka
Nakmka
V«^ Virginia
M*h Dakota
wyjbn
MinfMippi
North Dakota
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
American Samoa
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Columbia
Trust Territories
Virgin Islands
Final
Non-Fed
103
91
68
79
77
47
31
40
39
32
33
30
25
22
22
19
21
19
19
19
17
13
15
14
12
11
10
10
10
9
7
7
10
8
8
9
7
7
8
8
7
8
2
5
5
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0

Fed
6
4
20
4
0
4
14
2
0
4
0
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
4
3
0
2
2
1
2
2
1
0
1
0
4
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

Total
109
95
88
83
77
51
45
42
39
36
33
33
28
25
23
22
22
• 20
20
20
17
16
16
15
14
13
12
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
8
8
8
6
6
5
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total
1073    116
                                                  1189

-------
il

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency

For further information, call the
Superfund Hotline, toll-free at
1-800-424-9346 or 703-920-9810
in Washington.  DC. metropolitan
area, or the U S.  EPA
Superfund Offices
listed below

For publications, contact
Public Information Center,
PM-211B
401 M  Street SW.
Washington DC 20460
CML:(202) 382-2080
FTS: 382-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, OS-230
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
CML: (202)475-8103
FTS: 475-8103

Region 1
Superfund Branch, HSL-CAN 2
John F. Kennedy Building
Boston, MA 02203
CML: (617) 573-9610
FTS: 833-1610
Region 2
Emergency &  Remedial Response
  Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
CML: (212)264-8672
FTS: 264-8672
Region 3
Site Assessment Section. 3MW13
841 Chestnut  Building
Philadelphia. PA 19107
CML: (215) 597-3437
FTS: 597-3437
Region 4
Waste Management Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
CML: (404) 347-3454
FTS: 257-3454

Region 5
Remedial Response Branch,
5HS-11
230 South Dearborn Street,
12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
CML: (312)886-5877
FTS: 886-5877

Region 6
Superfund Management Branch
  Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas. TX 75202-2733
CML: (214)655-6740
FTS: 255-6740
Region 7
Superfund Branch
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City. KS 66101
CML: (913) 551-7052
FTS: 276-7052

Region 8
Superfund Remedial Branch, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2405
CML: (303) 294-7630
FTS: 330-7630
Region 9
Waste Management Division, H-i
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco. CA 94105
CML: (415)744-1730
FTS: 484-1730
Region  10
Superfund Branch, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle,  WA98101
CML: (206)442-1987
FTS: 399-1987

-------