SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

         IN THE TERRITORY OF GUAM



   This report (SW-l8ts) was written by

             Harry R. Little
  U.S.  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,  EDUCATION,  AND WELFARE
                Public Health Service
Consumer Protection and Environmental  Health Service
        Environmental  Control Administration
          Bureau of Solid Waste Management
                        1969

-------
Single copies of this publication will  be distributed as




supplies permit.  Address requests to the Bureau of Solid




Waste Management, 5555 Ridge Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45213-

-------
                           FOREWORD


IN KEEPING WITH the basic purpose of the Solid Waste Disposal Act

of 1965, one of the functions of the Bureau of Solid Waste Management

is to provide technical assistance to those State, local and private

agencies who request help in the planning, development, and imple-

mentation of improved solid waste disposal programs.  At the request

of the Government of Guam, the Bureau conducted a basic data survey

to study waste generation, collection practices, and disposal and

management methods on the island.  The basic data and the study

are reported in the following publication (SW-l8ts).  Our findings

and recommendations will hopefully be useful in establishing more

efficient, economic methods of solid waste collection and disposal

on Guam, where special problems in solid waste management have been

created by climate, topography, limited land area, and military

installations.   The study methods described in the report may be

applicable to other areas with similar solid waste management

problems.
                                    --RICHARD D.  VAUGHAN, Director
                                      Bureau of Solid Waste Management
                                   i i i

-------
                              CONTENTS






INTRODUCTION  	   1




REPORT SUMMARY  	   3




RECOMMENDATIONS 	   7




GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF GUAM	  13




   Topography	  13




   Geology	  16




   Climate	  16




   Population and Development 	  17




STUDY PROCEDURE	k  .   .  23




RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  	  25




   Solid Waste Generation 	  25




       Residential  	25




       Commercial	33




       Government	35




       Hotels and Motels  	35




       Parks	35




       Industrial	35




       Agricultural 	  37




       Hospitals and Clinics  	  37




       Schools	37




       Labor Camps	^tO




       Abandoned Automobiles  	  ^0
                                      i v

-------
   Sol id Waste Storage	k2

       Residential  	42

       Commercial and Institutional 	  5'

   Solid Waste Collection 	  52

   Solid Waste Disposal	63

   Management of Solid Waste Collection and Disposal  	  68

       Organization 	  68

       Manpower	69

       Legislation	71

       Budget	71

   Solid Waste Management on Military Bases 	  72

       Naval Operations	72

       Andersen Air Force Base	77

REFERENCES	80

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 	  81

APPENDICES  	83

   A   Report of Observations on Solid Waste Management
       Practices, Island of Guam,  November 1968 	  85

   B   Sample Size to Determine Solid Waste
       Densities  	97

   C   Solid Waste Separation 	  99

   D   Moisture-Content  Determination 	 100

   E   Effect of Rainfall  on Moisture Content
       of Solid Waste	103

   F   Collection Times  and Time-Study Procedure  	 107

-------
   G   Equipment Needs  ...................... 110

   H   Present Legislation  .................... ]]2

TABLES

  1     Summary of Estimated Amounts of Solid Waste Generated
       in Civilian Areas of Guam, by Sector ............   k
  2    Reported Temperatures on Guam  ...............  18

  3    Summary of Rainfall at Agana Naval Air Station,
       Guam, 1952-62  ... ....................  19

  k    Population of Guam   ....................  21

  5    Distribution of Residential Dwelling Units on Guam,
       March 1, 1969  .  ......................  26

  6    Collected Residential Solid Waste  .............  27

  7    Estimated Volume  and Weight of Residential
       Solid Waste Collected  ...................  29

  8    Composition of Residential  Solid Waste in Guam,
       February 26,1969, to March  5, 1969 .............  30

  9    Composition of Residential  Solid Waste in Guam
       and the Continental United  States  .............  31

 10    Distribution of Commercial  and Government
       Activities in Guam   ....................  3^
 11    Estimated Amounts of Solid Waste Generated
       Annually by Hotels and Motels on Guam  ...........  36

 12    Number and Volume of Solid Waste Samples  from Selected
       Schools on Guam, February 25 to March 7,  19&9  .......  38

 13    Estimated Weight of Solid Waste Generated by All  Schools
       on Guam  ....... ...................  39

 14    Amount of Solid Waste Generated by Labor
       Camps on Guam  . ......................  41
 15    Productivity of Collection Vehicle by Type of
       Truck and Route  ......................  56
                                      v i

-------
16    Department  of Public Works  Partial
D-l

E-l

Solid Waste Moisture-Content Determination, Territory of
Guam, February 26, 1969, to March 5, 1969 	
Average Rainfall at Agana Naval Air Station,
Guam, 1952-62 	

101

105
FIGURES
1
2
3

4
5
6

7

8

9
10
11

12
13
14
15
16
Location of Guam 	
Territory of Guam 	
Distribution of Residences on Guam, by Type of
Waste-Storage Container 	
Solid Waste Ready for Collection 	
Solid Waste Storage Area Before Collection 	
Distribution of Residences on Guam Using 55~gal Waste-
Storage Drums, by Number of Drums 	
Distribution of Residences on Guam Using 32-gal Waste-
Storage Containers, by Number of Containers 	
Distribution of Waste-Storage Containers Used on
Guam, by Container Volume 	
Residential Storage-Container Locations 	
Burning in Storage Containers 	
Two 32-gal Containers on Rack (Note 55~gal Drums
Also Present) 	
A 20-cu-yd Packer Truck 	
An 18-cu-yd, Top-Loading Packer Truck 	
A 12-cu-yd Dump Truck 	
Loading a Packer Truck (Note Yard Wastes) 	
Loading a Top-Loading Packer Truck 	
14
15

43
44
44

45

46

47
48
50

50
53
54
54
61
61
                                     VI I

-------
 17    Loading a Dump Truck (Tailgate Down)  	     62

 18    Loading a Dump Truck Over the Side	     62

 19    Solid Waste Disposal Sites 	     6k

 20    Yigo Dump	     65

 21    Ordot Dump	     65

 22    Filled Area of Ordot Dump	     66

 23    Agat Dump	     66

 2A    Bulk Containers (Naval  Station)   	     73

 25    Large Bulk Container (Naval  Station)  	     73

 26    Stationary Compactor (Naval  Station)  	     75

 27    "Shark Pit" Disposal Site (Naval  Station)   	     75

 28    Sanitary Landfill  (Naval  Station)   	     76

 29    Disposal of Waste Oils  (Naval Station)  	     76

 30    Storage Containers (Andersen Air  Force Base)  	     78

 31    Trench Landfill Operation (Andersen Air Force Base)   ...     78

 32    Burned Waste (Andersen  Air Force  Base)  	     79

 33    Dump for Bomb Cartons (Andersen Air Force Base)   	     79

E-l    Relation Between Rainfall, Moisture Content,  and
       Unit Weight of Solid Waste	    106

F-l    Field Survey Collection-Time Data Sheet  	    108
                                      VIII

-------
             SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE TERRITORY OF GUAM







     Solid waste collection and disposal is a growing problem in the




Territory of Guam.  Considerable effort has gone into studying the




shortcomings of the solid waste system of the Territory, and this effort




resulted in a report by Eldon P. Savage in January 1966 and another by




Albert E. Bertram in September  1967-  Both reports defined problem areas




and made recommendations for improving collection and disposal practices,




In 1968 the Government of Guam  requested assistance from the Bureau of




Solid Waste Management through  the San Francisco Regional Office of the




U.S.  Public Health Service for  further study of their system.  Accord-




ingly, Mr.  Donald M. Keagy, Solid Waste Management Representative, En-




vironmental Control  Administration, Region IX, and Mr.  Jack DeMarco,




Deputy Director, Division of Technical Operations, Bureau of Solid




Waste Management, went to Guam  in August 1968 to confer with local offi-




cials on the extent  of assistance needed.   A report on  their visit was




submitted to the Government of Guam in November 1968 (Appendix A).




     In an effort to assist the Government of Guam in implementing the




recommendations of that report, the Division of Technical Operations




agreed to conduct a  basic data survey on the island.   The study took




place from February  23 through March 7, 1969, and concentrated primarily




on collection practices and waste generation.  Attention was also given




to management and disposal methods.

-------
     The study was directed by Claude A. J. Schleyer, Chief, Systems




Section, Technical Assistance and Investigations Branch, Division of




Technical Operations, Bureau of Solid Waste Management.  Harry R. Little




served as project officer and was directly responsible for the devel-




opment of the study protocol.  Ronald A. Perkins was the third member




of the study team and has worked up much of the technical data.




     The objectives of this report are to define and evaluate existing




solid waste management practices and conditions in the Territory of




Guam, and to recommend corrections and improvements to the system.

-------
                             REPORT SUMMARY







     A brief summary of the study team's findings appears on these




pages .







                         Solid Waste Generation







     Res i dent i al.   Residential solid waste on Guam was estimated at




178,460 cu yd,  or 23,600, tons per year (Table 1).  This amount was




collected from a civilian area population of 61,283 as of January 1,




1969.  The waste that was studied contained 44 percent combustibles




and 56 percent noncombustibles by weight, as received.




     Commerc ia1.  Commercial  solid waste was estimated at 11,180 tons




per year.   This  total includes government buildings and clinics.




     Hotels and  Motels.  Using a previously determined factor of 0.6




Ib of solid waste per occupant per day, it was estimated that about




100 tons of waste are collected from hotels and motels annually.




     Hospi tal.   The solid waste from Guam Memorial Hospital  was esti-




mated at 0.9 tons  per day,  or 330 tons per year.




     Schools.   School waste was estimated to be 6.48 tons per school




day, or 1,170 tons per year.   This is based on an observed amount




of 0.11 cu ft of solid waste per student per day, and 4.4 Ib per cu




ft.




     Labor Camps.   Labor camps are estimated to produce about 1,090




tons of solid waste per year from a population of 1,865.

-------
                                TABLE 1

          SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED

                   IN CIVILIAN AREAS OF GUAM,  BY SECTOR


       Sector	Tons/day	Tons/year

     Residential                    6*4.7                     23,600

     Commercial                     30.6                     11,180

     Government"

     Hotel  and Motel                 0.3                        100

     Industri al
Agr i cul tural
Hospi tal
School
Labor camps
Total
-
0.9
3.2
3.0
102.7
-
330
1,170
1,090
37,470
    '^Included in commercial  sector.
     Smal1  amount.

     Mili tary.   The Navy estimates that their activities generate

650,000  cu  yd of solid waste per year, and the Air Force sets their

estimate at 390,840 cu yd per year.   If a unit weight of 5.6 Ib per

cu ft is assumed, these amounts become 48,000 and 30,000 tons per year,

respectively.

     Abandoned  Vehicles.  There are approximately 2,000 abandoned

vehicles on the island that are not located in organized storage areas.

-------
                           Solid Waste Storage






     Eighty percent of the storage containers encountered on Guam




were 55~gal drums,  10 percent were 32-gal containers, and the  remaining




10 percent were other types.  Burning and littered storage areas




were common.




     The average weight of the storage containers was 65  lb when




loaded and 42 lb when empty.  Thus, only 23 lb, or 35 percent of




the total weight, was actually waste to be collected.






                         Solid Waste Collection
     Collection of solid waste is the responsibility of the Department




of Public Works.  For this purpose, ten trucks are operated on a




day shift and three on an evening shift during the 6-day work week.




     Both packer trucks and dump trucks are used.  It was found,




however, that dump trucks take 238 percent as much time as packer




trucks to collect waste from a "typical" mile of residences on Guam.






                          Solid Waste Disposal






     The Government oi Guam operates five solid waste disposal sites,




all of which are open, burning dumps.  There is an operator and a




single bulldozer at one dump, but no attempt Is made to cover the




waste.

-------

-------
                            RECOMMENDATIONS






     The Territory of Guam has a serious solid waste management prob-




lem.  Major planning and financial effort on the part of the Government




of Guam must begin now if progress is to be made.  The Territory must




establish regular collection of solid waste, provide adequate facili-




ties to dispose of all waste in a sanitary manner, and have the ability




to meet emergency needs during periods of large waste production that




would follow a typhoon or similar catastrophe.




     To achieve the goal  of regular collection of solid waste,  the




following measures are recommended:




1.   The Department of Public Works should secure sufficient equipment




     and manpower to provide twice-weekly collection from all  residences




     and businesses and daily collection from schools, hospitals,  gov-




     ernment offices, and food preparation establishments.




     a.   It is estimated that nine additional packer trucks similar to




          those already on hand will  be needed to provide this  service




          (Appendix G).  Back-up equipment will also be needed.




     b.   Twelve drivers  and 24 collectors will be necessary for the




          packer trucks.




     c.   Salaries should be raised to attract enough qualified  workers.




          Collectors work harder than common laborers and should there-




          fore receive more pay.

-------
     d.    A training program for new employees  and continued training




          of crews should be instituted to insure safe and efficient




          operation of the equipment.




     e.    Candidates for collectors and drivers should be subjected to




          physical and mental  aptitude examinations in keeping with




          the position for which they  are applying.




2.   The dump trucks that are  presently being used should be retained




     for the collection of bulky waste and as back-up units for the




     packers .




3.   The Refuse Division should be headed by one person with three




     supervisors under him who will have direct responsibility for the




     crews .




k.   Night shift operations should be  eliminated.  With the present level




     of training and the lack  of supervision, operation of packer trucks




     at night results in unnecessary exposure of workers to accidents.




5.   A third collector should  be placed on the dump trucks as an interim




     measure until new equipment \s purchased.   The driver could then




     remain in the cab at stops and speed up collection.




6.   The statutes prohibiting  on-site, open burning of solid waste




     should be enforced.




7.   The size and weight of storage containers should be specified and




     enforced.




8.   Yard and bulky waste should be bundled for collection.  Bundles




     should be  less than 5 ft   long and weigh under 75  lb.

-------
9.   Solid waste storage containers should be kept at the rear of the




     residences rather than at the curb.  Homeowners should carry out




     their waste on the day of collection and return their empty con-




     tainers.  This arrangement will require the establishment of set




     routes that will  be collected on specific days.




10.  The possibility of using liners in storage containers should be




     investigated since they would allow additional storage capacity




     and would make curbside carryout easier.




11.  The possibility of using bulk containers at schools, hospitals,




     offices, and other large waste producers should be investigated.




     Two of the present trucks are capable of handling bulk containers.




12.  A system of tagging unsafe or unlawful  containers should be in-




     stituted.  Collectors could mark such containers and indicate




     that they will no longer collect them.




     Improved collection will result in greater amounts of solid waste




that must be disposed  of in a safe and sanitary manner.  It is therefore




recommended that:




1.   the five open-burning dumps be closed,  with due regard for insect




     and rodent control;




2.   a single sanitary landfill be established;




3.   the Ordot dump,  Agana swamp,  and several abandoned quarry pits  be




     included in the engineering investigations  that will be necessary




     to select the best site.

-------
     Improvements can also be made in administrative practices.  A




cost-accounting and control system applicable to efficient solid waste




management should be instituted.  The first steps should include




keeping daily records on the production of each collection crew and




on the amounts of waste received at the landfill.  The latter should




be done on a weight received basis, but it could also be done on a




volume bas is .




     Present legislation (Appendix H) is in need of major revision.




Special attention is needed in the following sections:




     §9660.   Definitions should be expanded and updated in accordance




     with present terminology.




     §9660.2.  Reference to metal  containers should be omitted and capa-




     city limited to 20 to 32 gal  with an empty weight of less than




     20 Ib.




     §9660.3.  Rubbish should be required to be placed in approved con-




     tainers with tight-fitting lids.  Large items such as tree limbs,




     weeds,  etc.  should be securely tied in bundles not to exceed 60  in.




     in length or 75 Ib in weight.




     §9660.6.  Garbage, rubbish, and other offensive substances should




     be limited to disposal in a sanitary landfill.  Placing solid waste




     in or near water sources should be prohibited.




     §9660.7.  This section should end after the word "substances"  in




     line five, so that all burning of garbage, dead animals, or other




     offensive substances  (except  in an approved incinerator) would be




     prohibi ted.







                                   10

-------
     59660.12, 59660.13, §9660.1^, and §9660.16.  These sections




     should be revised  in accordance with disposal  in a sanitary  land-




     fill.




A section should be added to provide penalties for  the violation  of the




provisions of this act.




     To enlist the cooperation of the people of Guam, certain steps




should be taken, including the establishment of a public relations




program to make people aware of the problems and of the Government's




efforts to resolve them.




     The Government of Guam collects and disposes of less than a  third




of the solid waste collected on the island.  Navy and Air Force author-




ities are faced with a  large responsibility in this area that is  not




in keeping with their primary mission.  It is therefore possible  that




they would relinquish their activities in solid waste management  to a




competent local authority.  In this light, it is recommended that the




Government investigate the possibility of combined, island-wide collec-




tion and disposal and the possibility of using existing military  solid




waste disposal sites.




     !n keeping with the above recommendations,  it  is further recommended




that the Territory of Guam develop a comprehensive solid waste manage-




ment plan that will extend through the year 2000.
                                   11

-------

-------
                       GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF GUAM


     Guam is the southernmost island in the Marianas chain and is a

territory of the United States (Figure 1).  It is governed by a presi-

dential ly appointed governor and guided by a group of 21 elected senators

Each of the 19 districts elects a commissioner, and although he has

no official powers, he usually exercises a great deal of influence over

the people of the district.

     The island of Guam has an area of about 212 square miles (Figure 2).

It is 30 miles long, and varies from a width of 8i miles in the northern

part, to 4 miles at the central part, to lli miles in the southern part.

     Most of the following information on the topography, geology, cli-

mate, population, and development of Guam has been quoted directly from

a geological survey paper published by the U.S. Department of the In-

terior. 1


Topography

     The northern half of Guam is a gently undulating limestone plateau
     bordered by steep wave-cut cliffs.  The plateau slopes generally
     south-westward from altitudes of approximately 600 feet in the
     north to less than 100 feet at the narrow midsection of the island.
     The generally uniform surface is interrupted by three hills --
     Barrigada Hill (665 ft), which is a broad limestone dome,  and Mount
     Santa Rosa (858 ft) and Mataguac Hill (630 ft), which are  composed
     of volcanic rock.

     No perennial streams exist on the plateau because of the high per-
     meability of the limestone.   Water may flow in short channels in
     the limestone during heavy rains, but it soon disappears into
     numerous sink holes and fissures.  Local  runoff has eroded gullies
     in the volcanic rock of Mount Santa Rosa and Mataguac Hill, but
     here also the water sinks rapidly into the limestone that  surrounds
     the hills.

                                   13

-------
 i-   >  E
 (0   I-  C
M-   3  U
H-  OO  0}
 O      >
:r  —  O
     (D  C3
  •   O

  •   cn co
co   O

  - "o
  .   0)   -
LU  C3  C
        O
Q_      4_)
      •  O)
  -EC

 i-   3  j:
 o  >~
 1-  Dl
 3  O
 o —
co  O
-—  i-
    T3
            Q.

           oo
        IT
         I
        O LA
       -3" MD
 CD
 3
CJ
         0)
         Q.  -
         (D  0)
        Q_  O
     ro
    Q
 O  
        M-  C
         O  —

        Q_  Q_

-------
                                              Andersen
                                            Air Force Bo
                             0123  4 Miles
Figure  2.   Territory  of Guam.
               15

-------
     It would therefore not be advisable to locate sanitary landfills

in the northern part of the island unless adequate precautions were

taken to prevent drainage from the fill into the porous limestone.  It

is expected, then, that any landfill would be located  In the southern

portion of the island, which is primarily voltan c in origin.


Geology

     The principal rock in the plateau in northern Guam is the Barrigada
     Limestone, which lies unconformably on an irreyular surface eroded
     fn volcanic rock of the Alutom Formation and is  overlain  by a
     veneer of the Mariana Limestone.  The base of the Sarrigada under
     most of the plateau is below sea level.  The volcanic rock extends
     above sea level in an area of several square miles near the northern
     end of the island and projects through the limestone at Mount Santa
     Rosa and Mataguac Hill.  Most of the limestone in trie plateau con-
     tains numerous caverns, fissures, and other solution openings, which
     give the rock a high overall permeability.  The  volcanic rock has
     low permeab i1i ty.

     The rocks south of a line between Pago Bay and Adelupe Point con-
     sists mainly of a complex of pyroclastic rock and lava flows,
     clastic sediments derived from the volcanic rock, and small amounts
     of interbedded limestone, which make up the Alutom, Umatac, and
     Bonya Formations.  Overlying parts of the complex are beds of the
     Alifan Limestone forming caps on peaks and ridges, and the Mariana
     Limestone forms marginal aprons along the coast.

     The volcanic rock and clastic sediments are thoroughly weathered
     to depths of 50 feet or more over much of the area of exposure. The
     upper few feet of the weathered section is common Iv granular and
     friable.  The permeability of the fresh and weathered rock is low;
     the friable mantle is generally a little more premeable than the
     underlying material.  The limestone lying on the volcanic and
     clastic rock has high permeability.


C1imate

     Guam is warm and humid.  The mean annual temperature near sea level
     is about 81°F; monthly means range from about 80° in January to
     82i° in June, and recorded extremes range from 64° in February to
     100° also in February.  The relative humidity i •:,  s-arely less than
                                    16

-------
     60 percent, and the mean humidity ranges from 66 percent in the
     early afternoon to 89 percent in the early morning.  [Additional
     temperature data have been compiled by the U.S. Department of
     Commerce (Table 2.)]

     Easterly trade winds are dominant throughout the year,  and they
     blow 90 percent of the time from January through May.  Calms
     are rare from January through May and are frequent from June to
     October.  Tradewind speeds generally are between 4 and  12 mph
     (miles per hour) and rarely exceed 2k mph, but typhoons passing
     over or near the island may bring winds having speeds greater
     than 100 mph.

     Guam has two distinct seasons--a dry season from January through
     May and a wet season from July through November.  December and
     June are transitional, or from year to year they may fall in
     either the wet season or dry season.  The mean annual rainfall
     ranges from about 80 inches on the coastal lowlands in  the Apra
     Harbor area to about 100 inches on the uplands in southern Guam.
     Of the total rainfall, 15-20 percent falls during the dry season,
     68-73 percent during the wet season, and the remainder  during the
     two transitional months.  Dry-season rainfall  is mostly from
     scattered light showers [Table 3]•  During the wet season, about
     a third of the rainy days have prolonged and steady rain.

     The heaviest prolonged rainfall on Guam is during the passing of
     typhoons.  The greatest rainfall recorded during a 24-hour period
     in postwar years occurred during typhoon Alice on October 14-15,
     1953, when 24.90 inches fell at Andersen Air Force Base and 15.80
     inches at the Agana Naval Air Station.  The median of the rainfall
     at 12 widely scattered stations during the 5~day period of rain-
     fall  associated with the typhoon was about 24  inches.


Population and Development

     The population of Guam, including the military forces,  was about
     67,000 in I960 according to the reports of the U.S. Bureau of
     the Census.  The civilian population is concentrated in towns
     and villages in the central part of the island and in villages
     scattered along the southern coast.   Centers of military popu-
     lation are at the Andersen Air Force Base in the northern part
     of the island, the Agana Naval Air Station,  near Agana, and at
     Guam Naval  Base, at Apra Harbor.
                                   17

-------
                                TABLE 2

                      REPORTED TEMPERATURES  ON  GUAM
Temperature
Normal
Dai ly
Period maximum
January
February
March
Apr! 1
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Year
83-9
84. 4
85-3
86. 4
87.1
87.3
86.7
86.4
86.2
85.8
85.2
84.4
85.8
Dai ly
mi n i mum
72.4
72.2
72.2
73.3
73.6
73.1
72.3
72.2
72.3
72.7
73-3
73.0
72.7
Month 1 y
average
78.2
78.3
78.8
79-9
80.4
80.2
79.5
79-3
79.3
79-3
79-3
78.7
79-3
Record
h i 9n
87
88
89
90
90
91
93
91
95
91
89
89
95
Extremes
Year
1962
I960
1965
I960
1966
1959
1966
1966
1957
1957
1962
1966
1957

Record
low
60
59
54
59
62
65
66
68
61
66
62
61
54

Year
1962
1959
1965
1965
I960
1965
1959
1965
1958
1965
1957
1967
1965
     Source:  Local  climatological  data;  annual  summary with  comparative
data, 1967, Guam, Pacific.   U.S.  Department of Commerce [1968].   4 p.
                                  18

-------
                              TABLE 3

    SUMMARY OF RAINFALL AT AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION,  GUAM,  1952-62
                              (Inches)
Month
January
February
March
Apr! 1
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual
Average
3.83
2.73
1 .90
2.87
3.68
4.48
9.10
12.68
14.71
13.06
10.18
5.46
84.70
Max imum
8.07
9-53
4.08
7-35
6.09
9-38
18.03
23-49
18.93
26.48
13-75
8.25
112.76
M i n imum
13.40
0.31
0.58
0.66
0.66
1.20
4.74
7-37
9.82
9.36
6.78
2.14
63.57
Med i an
2.53
2. 10
1.78
2.45
2.91
4.48
7.47
11 .58
15.14
11 .29
10.32
5.14
84.71
     Source:   Ward,  P.E.,  S.H.  Hoffard,  and  D.A.  Davis.   Hydrology  of
Guam.   Geological  Survey Professional  Paper  403~H.   Washington,  U.S.
Government Printing  Office,  1965-   28  p.
                                 19

-------
     Most of the civilian population is supported directly or indirectly
     by the activities of the Armed Forces.  About kO percent of the
     civilian labor force is employed by the Territorial  and Federal
     governments.  The remaining force is engaged largely in con-
     struction,  trade, transportation, and other services.  About 5
     percent work in manufacturing and agriculture.

     Agana is the center of civil  government and of  much  of the com-
     mercial activity of the island.  Commercial ships dock at Apra
     Harbor, and commercial airlines land at the Naval Air Station.
     A hard-surface road system covers the northern  and central  parts
     of the island.   Light-surface roads run along the east coast from
     Pago Bay around the southern  end to Umatac and  along the west
     coast from Agat almost to Umatac.
Guam is currently undergoing rapid economic growth.  New construction

is evident everywhere, and construction of several  new hotels to accom-

modate the developing tourist trade has begun.  Pan American Airlines

and Air Micronesia (Continental  Air Lines) are presently serving the

area.   Trans World Airlines has  been awarded a transpacific route to

Guam that should further stimulate the tourist industry, and several

shipping lines have begun stopovers in Guam that will very likely in-

crease as the new commercial port is completed.

     Because of the economic boom, there  is difficulty  in obtaining

qualified individuals to fill vacant jobs.  The problem is evident  in

the various departments of the Government of Guam,  where many positions

have not been filled for months  or years after their creation.

     Most of the island's population is concentrated in the central

area.   There are 19 villages, ranging in size from 982  to 6,7*18  inhabi-

tants   (Table k),  The total civilian area population is now estimated

at 61,283 by the Department of Public Works.
                                   20

-------
                            TABLE 4

                      POPULATION OF GUAM

                     (C i vi 1i an areas only)
Vi 1 lage January 1 , 1969*
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barr igada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mangi lao
Her i zo
Mongmong-Toto-Ma i te
Pi ti
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamun i ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
2,419
3,729
4,904
2,545
5,431
2,340
5,749
2,253
3,518
1,852
2,604
1,322
2,525
5,283
1 ,840
6,748
982
2,150
3,089
61,283
Apr! 1 1 , 1968f Apri 1 1 , 196?
2,356
3,612
4,737
2,450
5,240
2,233
5,332
2,183
3,417
1,807
2,469
1,252
2,440
5,159
1,779
6,320
912
1,929
2,971
58,598
2,200
3,328
4,260
2,307
2,307
2,058
4,240
2,098
2,968
1,732
2,420
1,188
2,333
4,813
1,739
5,508
882
1,685
2,919
53,744
••[Data from Department of Public Works, Guam.
 Data from Department of Health and Social Services, Guam.
                              21

-------

-------
                             STUDY PROCEDURE






     Before the arrival of the study team on Guam, personnel of the




Department of Public Works collected information on the number of




dwelling units, schools, businesses, government buildings,  industries,




hotels, and labor camps on the island.   Included was information on




village populations, school enrollments, and capacities of  the labor




camps.  These data were used in the preparation of this report.




     The study team also gathered data on the amount of solid waste




collected by the Government of Guam.  Volumes of solid waste were es-




timated by accompanying a collection truck and recording the volume




of waste collected at each service.  The total number of items, which




was defined as the number of containers, bundles, or other objects




collected, was also recorded for each service.  The team collected data




on 7 days for a total of 683 services in six villages.  Residences,




schools, businesses, and parks were included.




     To determine the density of the waste in the storage containers




(Appendix B),  110 items for collection were weighed with a platform




balance carrier, on a pickup truck.  Such weights were recorded for




residential waste in two of the villages.   To check the reliability




of the individual  weighings, loaded collection vehicles were weighed




on a commercial scale.




     Collected residential waste was separated in order to predict the




impact of changing present methods of waste preparation and storage
                                   23

-------
by residents.  Waste samples of approximately 200 Ib were hand separated




into nine components (Appendix C)  and subjected to moisture content




determinations so that the amount  of water in the solid waste could




be calculated.




     Time studies of collection crews at work were done to formulate




predictive equations of collection times for packer trucks and clump




trucks (Appendix F).




     Surveys of solid waste storage practices and abandoned vehicles




were also conducted.  Actual counts of abandoned vehicles and storage




containers were made in nine of the 19 villages on the island.




     The study team visited and inspected possible future sanitary  land-




fill sites with government officials in an effort to evaluate their




availability and acceptability.  United States Navy and Air Force in-




stallations were also visited to determine their methods of solid waste




management and to evaluate the feasibility of their possible adoption




by the Government of Guam.

-------
                         RESULTS AND DISCUSSION






                         Solid Waste Generation






     Res i denti al.   According to information obtained from the Department




of Public Works, there are a total of 12,693 residential dwelling units




on the island of Guam (Table 5)-  During the period of the study, the




average amount of residential solid waste collected was found to be




7.30 cu ft per dwelling per week and the average number of items




collected was 1.82 (Table 6).




     Analysis of the 110 weighings indicated that the average density




of the residential waste was 4.9 Ib per cu ft (standard deviation of




0.33).  Data obtained from the weighing of loaded trucks gave densities




under storage conditions of 5-8 and 4.9 Ib per cu ft.  The similarity




of these three figures increases confidence in the use of 4.9 Ib per




cu ft.




     Moisture content determinations on the residential solid waste




samples (Appendix D)  showed an average moisture content of 15-4 percent




on a wet-weight basis.  Since the study took place during the dry




season, it is felt that both the moisture content and the weight of




the waste will  increase during periods of heavy rain because of the




use of open storage containers.




     An analysis of the effect of rainfall on the moisture content of




solid waste (Appendix E)  develops a relationship between weekly rainfall
                                   25

-------
                           TABLE 5




          DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS




                    ON GUAM,  MARCH 1, 1969
Village
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barr igada
ChaJan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mangi lao
Merizo
Mongmong-Toto-Mai te
Pi ti
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamuni ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Single-fami ly
uni ts
170
590
720
365
969
450
1,372
300
675
294
585
223
440
686
334
1,829
117
562
679
11,360
Mul t iple-fami ly
uni ts
148
81
101
76
107
13
49
38
112
2
98
34
29
69
36
304
0
14
22
1,333
Total
318
671
821
441
1,076
463
1 ,421
338
787
296
683
257
469
755
370
2,133
117
576
701
12,693
Source:  Department of Public Works, Guam.
                             26

-------


















LU
h-
oo
<;£
•^J

Q
..
	 ] 	 ,
O C
oo O
. —
	 | 4-1
< 0
l_ ~-
LU O
Q 0
0^ X
LU »—
Q)
O O
LU ^
• v^ *•
o
LU
^j
O
o





























E s-~*
0) 4-J
4-> M—
• —
— O
O — '
~^»










Ol
c
• — s — v
i — 4-1
— M-
0)
3 u
-o u

1 —
o
>




c
O C
— o
4-> .—
fD 4-1
0) 3
~O Q-
o
-o a.
ro a)
T3 -C
C 4-1
ro
oo O
c
fD
0)
C
O C
— o
4-1 • —
fD 4-*
— fD
> ^—
0) 3
-a Q-
o
-a a.
L,
ro 0)
XI .C
C 4J
ro
4-1 M-
oo O
c
ro
0)





Dl
c
* —
r—
^—
0)
3
"O
*v^
1/1
E
(U
—



c
O C
— o
ro 4->
— ro
> r—
(!) a
-a a.
o
TJ CL
L-
ro 0)
-0 -C

ro
CO O
C
ro
(1)
0)
fD
•a -a
 O
D O
O
o:




vD vl> • — O O r^ vO CM
CM CM CA CO CO CM OO ~~
. . . . . . . •





^0-3- LA — CO-3-CMCM
r^oooo-3- oo oo
^ CO cA ^ ^ ^ LA ^







•^f o^ o~\ LT\ r^* c\j r^- r1*-
oo-d- roLn — r^csir^.
• * • • • • ••
r^ -^" r**^ -^" -^" vD OO Lf^







CM — — LAvOvD-^TO
cvj r— ^* i— oo f^« ^*O ro
VD' vo' oo' o^ L^ r^ m i>l








LA-^T • — O^\ ' — CS COv£>
r^-* O^\ O^\ oo O "-J" vO ro
• • • * « * ••
00 — — — — — —






LA cr\oo r>» -a- CM CMCM
vO LA ^™* O "d" O~\ CJ*\ OO
JJCN'CM-^J-


(U
CT1
/•• *«. x-~^ X" "~s x"^ »U
O^ O^ O O"^ O^ O*^ O^ '•"""^ *""~v x°~^- ^~
cvorovocvi) vo cn cr\ o^o)
. 	 | ^— | ._ | | Q \^ Q v,Q v^ >
C LA •— VO C r^ OO N 1 ~O 1 1 <£
DCM CT1CM 3CM OCM •— OO d) LA C vO
El Cl El Oil l-l -01 fOI
rocM fDCM rocM -—CM (Uoo ro c/ioo
^— . — 2: — 1 — — >- — 21 — Q — • 
-------
and the unit weight of the residential  solid waste.   The results of




this analysis give an average annual  unit weight of  9.8 Ib per cu




ft.  The density would change with the season, as mentioned;  but for




the purposes of this report,  it is felt that the average density of




9.8 Ib/cu ft is a conservative estimate and will give acceptable results




     Use of this average density and  the data presented in Table 6




allows the calculation of the total  tons of solid waste collected




each year from residences (Table 7).




     Residential solid waste  amounts  to an estimated 178,460  cu yd, or




23,600 tons per year (Table 7).  Using a civilian area population of




61,283, this amount becomes 2.1 Ib of residential solid waste per




capita per day, or about 770  Ib per capita per year.




     During the period of the study,  five separations of residential




solid waste were made to determine composition.  Samples were hand




separated into nine categories (Appendix C), and the results  are shown




in Table 8.




     Similar separations of residential solid waste  have been made




in the continental United States (Table 9)-2  A recently completed




national survey of solid waste in the continental United States3 es-




timates that a daily average  of 3 Ib  of residential  solid waste per




capita is collected.




     The daily per capita amount of each waste component is then found




by multiplying the total average per  capita (3 Ib) by the average per-




cent of each component by weight (Table 9)-  A similar analysis was
                                   28

-------
                            TABLE 7

 ESTIMATED VOLUME AND WEIGHT OF RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTED
Vi 1 lage
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barr igada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mang i 1 ao
Mer izo
Mongmong-Toto-Ma i te
Piti
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamuni ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Total dwel 1 i ng
u n i t s »
318
671
821
441
1,076
463
1,421
338
787
296
683
257
469
755
370
2,133
117
576
701
12,693
Cubic yards
per yeart
4,470
9,430
11,540
6,200
15,130
6,510
19,980
4,750
11,070
4,160
9,600
3,610
6,590
10,620
5,200
29,990
1,650
8,100
9,860
178,460
Tons per
yearf
590
1,250
1,530
820
2,000
860
2,640
630
1 ,460
550
1,270
480
870
1 ,400
690
3,970
220
1,070
1,300
23,600

'-From Table IV,
t(No. of Dwellings)x(7.3)x(52)f(27).
f(Cubic Yards per Year)x(27)x(9.8)*(2000).
                               29

-------





















cn
\o
cn

„
LA
X
0
&.
s:

o
4->

cn
VD

t—

(I
VD
CM

<
a:
OQ
UJ
u.
„
X
Z>
o

•z.
—

LU
to

3
o
—
0
to

1
<
1—

UJ
ID
to
UJ
u.
o

JJ
o

l-
to
o
D_
s:
o
u

















(U
3 C
(/) 4_> (J^>
— C ~—
O O
s: o
(U -M

a. cn_a
E — —
ro 

cn


ra

u


1/1
• —
ro

(U
s:

•§

3


^
i)
~
X
01
h-


.

 3
O-TD
ro o
a. L-
a.


c
d) QJ
-a -M

ra ra
0 2
0)
-a -M
O */>
O fu
LJ- 2
73
C C
ro M- o
o —

cn a) o
ro 4-1 aj
— (U ^

Z o
> o


 0~\
(NJ -— r—


1 — cr\ o
CO CO vO










-3- -3- 0
• — O CO










0^ LA LA

i-x» oo r***
-d" r^ ro


fv-\ GO r —

• — cs o




LT\ LH LA
— CN -3-










^D oo -^r

eg o ro








oo ^J- r^\

LT\ r^ LA
i— r— I—




o ro -4-
• *
O PO CNl
i— i—



O -3" cv(

CM a^ CN


^— *, ^-^s
O cn cn ^
fD \D vO CT\
• — I 1 O ^O
«— vO CO N 1
O> rw O CM — ro
c i cn i i- i
ID CM — CM 0) OO
21 * — ' >- " — ' SI * — ""


CM cn -3-

•=r \o LA
CM — —

O LA O

-3- co cn
^o cn cn
CM -— —


cn oo LA
LA oo r^-










o oo vo
. — > — ro










CM O OO

— — LA
CM ro oo


oo LA cn

• — oo —




LA OO •—
cn r--. LA










r*- oo CM

CM — CM








o cn o

r*^» -zf \o
f— 1— 1—




-sr "~" r*^>


r— >~— i 	



o oo r^-

-zt O P1^-


cn
01^-^ -— . ro
c cn cn »-
»— ^O O \O D
C 1 TD 1 >
3-3-  LA <
El T3 1
fO CA QJ fv-i
|_ ~_- 0 — '
30

-------

































CTi

LU
_l
CO
<
1-



















































co
LU
-
O TO
-a
4-
O s-
0)
in CL
xi
C TO
^ 4-J
O —
a. CL
TO
~D U
CD
TO CO
E a.
• —
4-J
in
LU
in
— CD
ro 4-J
4-1 TO
C 4-J
0) oo
c
— T3
4-J CL)
C 4-1
o —
0 C
— 1











E
TO
^
cn






4-1
C
0)
c
o
CL
E
O
O
4-J
4— f~
O CD
•—
4-J CD
c 5
0)
U >
! 	 Q
0)
CL

CO
CD
TO
s_
CL)
>
<
10
— 0)
TO 4->
4-J TO
C 4-1
1) CO
C
•— "O
4-1 CL)
C 4-J
O —
0 C
ZD










E
TO
0





















4-J
C
co
c
o
CL
e
o
C->




\O LT\ -d~ CT> \O
MD — -cr o o
o o — o o
















VD CM -3- LA —
— CM ro o —
• « • * •
O O O O O












CM LA OO r<-l CM
CM -T















r*^ r*^ o CM •—
t~~- O vO CM LA







L-
CL)
4-J
TO
0)
f—

»«
L-
in CL)
4-1 O
- "in
TO Q. O a)
2 c —
0
U  ~o
— CL)
Q 4-J

*• C
4-J ID
C
0) —
E TO
CO 4-J
CD C
TO 0)
C C
TO — -
>_ 4-J
c
co o
4-J CJ
in
nj a)
3 .n
4-J
— o
O 4-
co
U- TO
O X)
D 1_
TO CL>
CO CL
L_
13 TO
rn 4-1
.__
CL
CO TO
0 U

> U
L. CO
0) Q.
co
co
-C 4-1
4-J (ft
— TO
TO 2
CO
Z "D

0 —
0 •
!— in E
-D TO
Q_ TO C3
• 4-1 U
co CO
CO 4-
^ •- >-
" 1/1 fD
ro CD -a
[ i t_
ro u
X) 4- CO
O CL
co • _a TO
x: in ' — 4-J
we —
— O O CL
— — • ro
-Q 4-1 rr-> O
3 TO
a. u c s_
c: co o co
DO. a.
c^ "O
E co .0
O — in —
i- TO ro
Lu O OQ • —

C CM
JZ
o x)
co c
h- ro
31

-------
made for Guam based on the average percentages given in Table 8 and a




per-capita waste amount of 2.1 Ib per day (Table 9)•




     By comparing the percentage compositions of waste for the con-




tinental United States and Guam (Table 9) it is seen that Guam has




higher percentages of garden waste and noncombustibles than the con-




tinent, and lower percentages of food waste and paper products.  A




comparison of the per-capita amount of each waste component collected




points out further differences between Guam and the continental United




States.




     The present practice of feeding food waste to poultry and swine




is probably responsible for removing large amounts of this component




from the collected residential waste.  If this practice were stopped,




the amount of food waste collected would increase and perhaps would




reach  those levels estimated for the continental United States.




     Burning of combustibles by private  individuals is partially re-




sponsible for the low quantities of paper products collected.  If such




household burning of waste were eliminated, the amount of paper waste




collected would of course increase.  It would not be expected to reach




the quantities encountered on the mainland, however, because of the




extensive use of metal packaging materials and the high  local cost of




paper  convenience items such as plates,  tablecloths, and other similar




i terns.




      If the household burning of combustibles and the feeding of food




waste  to poultry and swine were stopped  in the near future, the amounts
                                   32

-------
of paper products and food waste collected daily could be expected to




increase by about 0.7 and 0.5 lb per capita, respectively.  This increase




would result in an estimated 3-3 lb of residential waste collected




da ily per cap i ta.




     Commerc i al.   The waste-generation rate for commercial activities




is usually related to gross sales,  number of employees, floor area, or




some other similar measurement.   Accurate information of this type could




not  be obtained by the study team in the time permitted.  Areas of com-




mercial  operations were identified, however, throughout the island (Table




10).   It was beyond the magnitude of this study to categorize each ac-




tivity,  but it  was observed that most commercial establishments were




either grocery stores, laundries, electronics shops, or other similar




types of small  businesses characteristic of any community.  Most of




the  commercial  waste is generated in those areas with the highest




concentration of such activities, primarily in the villages of Agana




and  Tamuning and the adjacent areas.




     Previous studies of commercial waste in the continental United




States have defined an average amount of waste collected as about 1




lb per person daily.3  Using this figure as a base, a reasonable




estimate of the amount of commercial waste collected is about 30.6




tons  per day,  or 11 ,180 tons per year.




     The unit weight would be about 150 lb per cu yd or 5-6 lb per cu




ft.1*   This would mean that commercial wastes would amount to about




1^9,000  cu yd per year.
                                   33

-------
                            TABLE  10




   DISTRIBUTION  OF COMMERCIAL  AND  GOVERNMENT  ACTIVITIES  IN  GUAM
Village
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barr igada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mangi lao
Meri zo
Mongmong-Toto-Mai te
Pi ti
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamuni ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Number of
commerci al
es tab 1 i shments*
149
16
36
17
42
8
21
11
10
13
34
10
5
32
10
104
6
11
12
547
Number of
government
bui Id i ngs*
8
1
3
3
1
1
1
3
4
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
40
"Data from Department of Public Works,  March  1,  1969.
                               34

-------
      Government.  Government buildings on Guam were also tabulated by




the study team (Table 10).  The amount of waste generated by government




office activities is small and is assumed to be included in the figures




for commercial wastes.




      Hote 1 s and Motel s .   The number of hotel and motel rooms on Guam
total ^5 (Table 11).  Past studies5 have indicated that the amount of




waste generated by hotels and motels is about 0.6 Ib per occupant daily.




If it is assumed that two people occupy each room, there will be an




estimated 100 tons of waste generated per year from these sources.




      Composition of waste from hotels and motels would be expected to




be about 80 percent combustibles (including 5 percent food waste),  and




20 percent noncombus t ib les .




      Parks .   Parks were not studied directly in this survey.  The  amount




of waste generated in the parks on Guam is small in relation to other




sources, and  their omission here is not serious.  Studies in other  areas,




however, have shown that a picnicker can be expected to generate about




1  Ib of waste per meal.5




      Composition of park waste in the continental United States is about




kS percent food waste,  30 percent other combustibles, and 25 percent




noncombus t ib les . 5  The  composition is expected to be somewhat different




on Guam because of packaging methods—about 40 percent food waste,




25 percent other combustibles,  and 35 percent noncombust ib les .




      I ndust r ial .   Industrial  activity in the civilian areas on Guam




is very light.   Therefore, no estimation of industrial  waste was made.
                                    35

-------
                            TABLE 11

     ESTIMATED AMOUNTS OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED ANNUALLY

                  BY HOTELS AND MOTELS ON GUAM
Vi 1 lage
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barrigada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mangi 1 ao
Meri zo
Mongmong-Toto-Mai te
Pit!
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamuni ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Number of
rooms-
33
249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
101
0
0
0
0
62
0
0
0
445
Tons of waste
per year"f
7
55
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
22
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
100
"Data from Department of Public Works, March 1, 1969.
^(No. of Rooms) x (2) x (0.65) * (365) * (2000).
                               36

-------
      Agr i cu1tural.   There is very little agriculture on Guam.  For




this reason, the contribution of agriculture to the solid waste prob-




lem is small and  is  not considered in this report.




      Hospitals and  Clinics.  Guam has one civilian hospital and 27




clinics of various sizes.  Most of the clinics are offices, and their




wastes are assumed to be included in the total amount of commercial




waste.




      Hospital  solid waste is estimated at 7 to 8i Ib, or 0.7 cu ft




per patient daily.6   Guam Memorial Hospital treats about 235 patients




per day.  Therefore, using a figure of 7-7 Ib per patient per day,




the annual  contribution of the hospital would be approximately 330




tons,  or 2,200 cu yd of solid waste per year.




      Schools.   The  Government of Guam operates junior and senior high




schools, elementary  schools, head start projects, and the University




of Guam. The Catholic Church is also quite active in education and




operates both  elementary and high schools.  There are also several




other parochial schools, private schools, and academies.




      Data gathered  during the period of the study in a similar manner




as for residential waste indicate that each student generates an average




of 0.11 cu ft  of solid waste per school day (Table 12).  The amount of




school waste collected by village has been estimated by assuming a den-




sity of k.k Ib  per cu ft (Table 33).   School  waste totals about 1,170




tons per year  and is generated primarily during the 9 months from




September through May.  The school waste was composed mostly of paper
                                    37

-------
                           TABLE 12




NUMBER AND VOLUME OF SOLID WASTE SAMPLES FROM SELECTED SCHOOLS




            ON GUAM, FEBRUARY 25 TO MARCH 7,  1969
Number of
i tems
col lected
School da i ly
Brodie School
Brodie School
St. Francis
7th Day Adventists
Talofofo
Talofofo Publ ic
Notre Dame School
Inarajan Junior and Elementary
Mer izo
Merizo Elementary
Adelup School
Old Pit!
New Piti
Piti Head Start
Total
7
6
20
2
2
8
3
28
3
14
8
5
12
2
120
Vol ume
(cu ft)
33
2k
Ik
2
3
51
19
108
15
30
60
30
57
9
515
Number of
students*
120
120
702
103
40
364
105
948
98
297
701
385
545
39
4,567
cData from Department of Public Works, March 1, 1969.
                             38

-------
                           TABLE 13

          ESTIMATED WEIGHT OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED

                   BY ALL SCHOOLS ON GUAM
Vil lage
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Asan
Barr igada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
1 narajan
Mangi lao
Merizo
Mongmong-Toto-Ma i te
Piti
Santa Rita
S i najana
Ta lofofo
Tamun ing
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Total Number
of students*
902
506
2,606
758
2,744
1,327
3,841
948
3,277
395
58
969
379
1,193
612
3,032
147
2,172
913
26,779
Es t imated
tons of waste
per day"*"
0.22
0.12
0.63
0.18
0.66
0.32
0.93
0.23
0.79
0.10
0.01
0.23
0.09
0.29
0.15
0.73
0.04
0.53
0.22
6.48
Est imated
tons of waste
per yearf
39
22
114
33
120
58
168
41
143
17
3
42
17
52
27
133
6
95
40
1,170
>From Department of Public Works.
t(No. of Students)x(0.11)x(4.4)x(l80)v(2000).
^Calendar year (based on 180 school  days per year).
                             39

-------
and food wastes, with noncombustibles making up only a small  portion




of the total. Because of its composition, the density used was a little




less than that for commercial waste.




      Labor Camps.  A number of labor camps are operated by construc-




tion companies and other contractors to house imported Philippine




workers.  These camps normally consist of barracks for the workers and




associated kitchen, dining, and recreational areas.  Information gathered




on Job Corps Camps in the United States indicates that about 2.5 lb




of kitchen waste and 0.7 lb of waste from the dormitories are generated




by each corpsman daily.5  This total of 3-2 lb of waste per corpsman




per day should be valid for estimating waste loads from labor camps.




By using the 3.2-Ib-per-capita figure, it is estimated that 1,090 tons




of waste per year will be generated in labor camps (Table 14).




      The composition of the kitchen waste is mostly food scraps, wet




paper, and noncombustibles.  Dormitory waste is mainly paper by volume




but noncombustibles by weight.




      Abandoned Automobiles.  A survey of abandoned vehicles was made




in different areas of the  island.   Organized junk or car lots were ex-




cluded from the survey.  Along the 32.5 miles of main arteries surveyed




there were found to be 6.3 abandoned vehicles per mile.  On the 12 miles




of residential streets studied, this ratio was 15-1 vehicles per mile.




The total average was 10.7 vehicles per mile.




      There are over  200 miles of road on the island of Guam.  Using the




average figure of  10.7 vehicles per mile, it is estimated that there

-------
                            TABLE 14

     AMOUNT OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED BY LABOR CAMPS ON GUAM
Labor camp
Agana
Agana Heights
Agat
Ani gva
Asan
Barri gada
Chalan Pago-Ordot
Dededo
Harmon
Harmon Field
1 narajan
Mangi lao
Meri zo
Mongmong-Toto-Ma i te
Pit!
Santa Rita
S i najana
Talofofo
Tamun i ng
Umatac
Yigo
Yona
Total
Number of
workers*
73
140
0
108
10
50
7
35
46
81
0
50
0
98
0
0
22
28
1,117
0
0
0
1,865
Es t imated
tons of waste
per year^
43
82
0
63
6
29
4
20
27
47
0
29
0
57
0
0
13
16
653
0
0
0
1,090
-Data from Department of Public Works, March 1,  1969.
+(No. of Workers)  x (3.2)  x (365)  ^ (2000).
                               41

-------
are approximately 2,000 abandoned vehicles on the island that should




be collected and disposed of by the Government of Guam.  An effort should




be made to find a market for these abandoned vehicles as scrap steel.




If they are found to have no salvage value they could be disposed of at




sea as has been the practice in the past.






                        Solid Waste Storage






      Res ident ial.   As part of the total  study, a survey was made of




residential solid waste storage practices in nine of the 19 villages




on Guam.   Included were 384 homes, or 3 percent of the civilian




dwelling units on Guam.




      Of those residences surveyed, 79 percent stored solid waste in




55~gal drums only,  3 percent used nothing but 32-gal containers, 3




percent used only some other type of containers, and 15 percent used




a combination of different types of containers (Figure 3)-   In addi-




tion, 9 percent of the residences had some wastes that were not stored




in any type of container (Figures 4 and 5).




      The homes that used only 55~gal drums exhibited the following




distribution:  58 percent had only one drum, 36 percent had two drums,




5 percent had three drums, and 1 percent had four or more drums (Figure




6).




      The  13 homes in the sample using only 32-gal containers showed




the following distribution:  46 percent had only one can, 15 percent




had two cans, 23 percent had three cans, and 16 percent had four or




more cans  (Figure 7) •

-------
 55-gal drums only

 32-gcl drums only
Other types only

Combination of containers
                            10
           10
          TYPE OF  CONTAINER USED
Figure 3-  Distribution of residences on Guam,
           by type of waste-storage container.

-------
       Figure k.  Solid waste ready for collect!
on.
Figure 5.   Solid waste storage area before collection.

-------
 Residences using one drum

| Residences using Two drums
J Residences  using three drums
 [ Residences using more than
  Three drums
                               15
  Figure  6.   Distribution of  residences on Guam
             using 55~gal waste-storage drums, by
             number of drums.

-------
LU
O
2
Ul
Q
CO
LU
or

LL
o

o:
LU
oo
            Residences  using one container   |    Residences using three containers
        Residences  using  two containers
| Residences using more than
 three  containers
10
     0
                                                       ^.
              Figure 7-   Distribution of  residences  on Guam
                          using  32-gal waste-storage  containers.,
                          by  number of containers.

-------
     600-
               55-gal  containers
  CO
  a:
  LU
  8  500

  LJ.
  o

  a:
  UJ
  OQ
      100-
^S 32-gal containers


|   j Other containers
                                          66
                     TYPE  OF CONTAINER  USED


             Figure 8.   Distribution of waste-storage containers

                        used on Guam,  by container volume.
      A total of 659 storage containers were observed during the survey,



Of these,  80 percent were 55~gal drums, 10 percent were 32-gal con-



tainers, and 10 percent were different types (Figure 8).  Seven percent



of the  175 residences having only one 55~gal drum exhibited debris



outside the containers.  Ten percent of the 111 homes with two 55~gal


drums had  debris.  One of the 14 residences with three 55~gal drums



also had such debris.  Therefore, it appears that the incidence of


litter or  debris is not really related to the number of containers



available  for storage.



      Storage containers are generally kept at curbside (Figure 9),



supposedly because of the unpredictability of collection, but also

-------
             Figure 9.  Residential  storage-container locations.







because 55-gal  drums,  which are the predominant storage containers,




cannot be easily set out for collection.   If smaller containers were




used, solid waste could be stored out of  sight at the rear of the




houses and carried out for collection by  the individual homeowner.




Storage at the rear would also limit the  access of children, clogs, and




chickens to the stored waste.




      Most containers are stored on racks that vary in height from




a few  inches to about 3 ft.  Many are in  need of repair, and some




should be eliminated  entirely because of  their height and unsafe con-




dition.  Storage  racks  improve the sanitation of the storage area, but




they  should be  limited  from  12 to 18 in.  in height and be soundly




constructed in an  acceptable manner.  Use of  racks would also allow




lids  to be tied  to them to prevent loss  in  high winds.

-------
      Open burning is common both in and around cans (Figure 10). Such




burning results in discoloration and rapid deterioration of the cans




and contributes to air pollution.  It also creates ashes that are




blown when the container is emptied, thereby hindering the perfor-




mance of the collection crews.   If a fire is not completely out when




a can is collected, it poses the additional  problem of starting a fire




in the collection vehicle.




      Some residents have made an effort to improve storage practices




by purchasing 32-gal containers.  Both galvanized steel and plastic




containers were observed.  Many of the galvanized cans were of the




heavy-duty, reinforced type used by the military.  The use of these




heavy cans should be discouraged because of their excessive weight




(30-35 Ib when empty).




      Many of the residents using 32-gal containers also had 55~gal




drums in the storage areas  (Figure 11).  It appeared to be common prac-




tice to fill the 55-gal drums with waste first and then to use the




32-gal containers for the excess.




      The Government of Guam has made an effort to upgrade storage area




appearances by selling painted drums through the Guam Rehabilitation




Center.   This approach does not consider the more important problems




involved in collecting the  55~gal drums or the problems created by




the 1ack of lids.




      If solid waste handling and disposal  is to be improved on Guam,




one of the first steps must be the elimination of unsuitable storage




contai ners.

-------
     i.X '  '**»*

      Figure 10.   Burning in storage containers.
Figure 11.  Two 32-gal containers on rack (note 55"
            gal drums also present).
                       50

-------
      Acceptable containers should be enclosable to prevent insect and




rodent infestation.  To achieve this goal, containers should have




tight-fitting lids and be free of holes.  They should be cleanable




and free from corners and edges where material may accumulate.  Con-




tainers should be durable, capable of withstanding handling, and man-




ageable.  Their full weight should not exceed 75 lb.  They should




be equipped with handles and of a size that can be handled by one




man.




      The 55~gal drums do not meet any of these criteria and should be




prohibited.  Similarly, use of undersized containers (under 20-gal




capacity)  should be limited because of the excess handling involved




in their use.  Efforts should be made to encourage or require residents




to use lightweight containers of 20- to 30~gal capacity.




      Containers that do meet these criteria  include galvanized steel




cans  and high impact plastic cans.  If containers of sufficient dura-




bility were obtained, plastic containers would seem to be advantageous




in the humid climate of Guam because of their resistance to corrosion.




      Commercial and Institutional. Solid waste storage practices at




commercial  and institutional locations do not vary greatly from those




at residences.  The 55~gal drums are the predominant storage containers,




with  some locations having up to a dozen. All of the drawbacks of




55~gal drums discussed in the residential-storage section apply to




commercial  and institutional situations. The problems are amplified,




however,  by the necessity of using a larger number of containers per




servi ce.
                                    51

-------
      Because of the large amounts of waste generated per day at com-




mercial and institutional locations, large, bulk containers could




be used.  These usually vary from I  to about 8 cu yd and are mechanically




emptied into packer trucks.






                          Solid Waste Collection






      Collection of solid waste on Guam is the responsibility of the




Department of Public Works.   To carry out this assignment they use




three 20-cu-yd packer trucks, two 18-cu-yd top-loading packer trucks,




and five 3~cu-yd dump trucks (the capacity of which has been increased




to about 12 cu yd by providing side  boards of wire mesh) (Figures




12-14).




      One driver and two loaders work with each truck.  On the dump




trucks the driver also acts  as a loader, so that two men lift the




container onto the truck, and the other man, stationed on the truck,




unloads the containers.




      Solid waste is collected on a  weekly basis from all residences




and businesses.  Commercial  establishments can pay to have waste re-




moved more frequently, if desired, or they can haul their own to the




dumps.  The hospital, schools, and government offices have their waste




collected daily.




      Normal collection operations are carried out between 7 a.m.




and 3:30 p.m., with three trucks operating on a second shift from




3:30 p.m. to 12 midnight.  Crews work six days a week with holidays




off.
                                   52

-------
Figure 12.   A 20-cu-yd packer truck.
               53

-------
Figure 13.   An 18-cu-yd,  top-loading packer truck.
     Figure  14.  A  12-cu-yd dump truck.

-------
      Studies were made of collection-vehicle productivity  (Appendix F).




Productive time (Table 15) is defined as the time actually spent




handling the items for collection.  (Waiting time is that time when




handling of waste stops to allow for moving the truck or packing the




load.  The off-route, or other time is avoidable delay time which can




usually be decreased by closer supervision).




      An examination of the data reveals several interesting items. The




number of miles per minute, for example, does not show any significant




variation from village to village or by type of collection truck. The




number of services per mile, services per minute, and items per minute




do, however, show definite differences between dump trucks and enclosed




packing vehi cles .




      A regression analysis of the observed distances, numbers of ser-




vices, and numbers of items was run against the productive times.  This




analysis allowed the determination of the relative effects that the




three factors had upon the response variable.  The results of the re-




gressions are in the form of equations in which the productive times




are expressed as functions of the route distance, the number of services,




and the number of items for collection.  It was found that the number




of items for collection was the variable with the greatest effect on




the productive time.  The number of services was the next most impor-




tant, and the number of miles traveled was the least.




      A preliminary analysis of the data indicated that all  of the infor-




mation gathered on packer trucks (including the top-loader)  could be
                                    55

-------































LA
•—
LU
I
— ^
CO
-
t-

>.
CD

LU
1
_J
X
LU
>
Z
O
—
1-
CJ
LU
_J
i
O
<->
lj_
O

>_
I—

;>
^_
|_
c ^
~~^
Q
0

0-




















0) >
Q.— 0)
4-1 4-1
in o 3
E 3 C
0) -a —
•WOE
— L.
Q.

(1) (U
Q. U
• —
t/1 >
E i-
0} (U
4-1 I/)


0)
1- >
OJ — 0)
Q- 4-1 4-1
U 3
t/1 3 C
0) "D '~
— o E

Z Q.



l_
I) 1)
a. >
1/14-14-1
0) U 3
U 3 C
.- T3 •-
> O E

a) a.
OO




t/1 Q)
OJ —
O —
— E

1— i—
Q) (U
c/) Q.










_y
U
3 0)
1_ 4-1
•M 3
O
14- 1-
O
TJ
0) C
Q. tO
^
(—



^- -J" Csl vO o^\ "3" vO
fa o -3" m LA cx3 ra
• • • • • • •
CM CO OO CO CO O • —







oo vD — -a- CM o oo
o co o r^* vo o CM
• • • • • • •
— CM CM — . — CM —






-3" CM ro ro o^i CM -3"
O O O O O O O
• • • • • • •
0000 0 00



j
(




LT\ cr\ o ro CM cv) r*-s
^~ CNJ P-"* O^\ CV] -3" ^^
• « • * f • *
CM •— — — cvj O —










CM o o r-* o o oo

^f o LA o oo o vo
Ljf"\ v^ \O ^** ^«O C^ C*4








-:; m
-
Q.
E
•—
4J
O
c

i/i
01
0
TJ

t/1
0
3
-a
o
L-
Q.

f^
to
• — .
O
L.
0)
E
E
O
O
14-
o

c
o
. —
-t-J
C
d)
2:
-];





56

-------
grouped and used to define a genera] equation for packer-truck productive

times.  Similarly, all of the data for dump trucks were combined, and

one equation was determined.  These two equations are shown below:


     Packer:  Productive time (minutes) = 2.8*4 x  (miles) + 0.09 x

                                          (No. of services) + 0.21 x

                                          (No. of i terns) + 0.38

     Dump:    Productive time (minutes) = 8.63 x  (miles) - 1.29 x

                                          (No. of services) + 1.40 x

                                          (No. of i terns) + 0.99

     where

     Productive time equals the time elapsed to collect a given area,
        multiplied by the fraction of productive  time;

     Miles equals the number of street miles that the collection vehicle
        travels in the area;

     Number of services equals the number of waste sources collected
        from within the area; and

     Number of items equals the total number of containers, bundles, or
        other objects that must be collected from the waste sources.


     The equation for packer trucks explained 88  percent of the varia-

tion in the data, with a standard deviation of 23 percent of the

response mean.  Eighty-six percent of the variation was explained for

dump trucks, with a standard deviation of 24 percent of the response

mean.

     If the physical  characteristics (miles, services, and items)  of

the collection area are known, these equations can be used to predict

the productive time necessary for collection.
                                   57

-------
     During the period of study, it was found that an average of 1.82




items were collected per service (Table 6), and that there were approx-




imately 65 services per mile (Table 15)-  A packer truck would therefore




take 33.91 productive minutes and a dump truck 91-39 productive minutes




to collect from a "typical" mile.




     In addition to productive times, the waiting times and other




daily times involved with collection were recorded (Appendix F).  It




was found that for packer trucks, productive time was 60.9 percent of




the total time.  Waiting time was 34.8 percent, and other time accounted




for 4.3 percent of the total.  The productive time for dump trucks was




69-0 percent,  with 26.3 percent classed as waiting time and 4.7 percent




as other time.




     In order to calculate the total time for collection, it is necessary




to add waiting time and other time to the productive time.  For packer




trucks, the waiting time is 57 percent of the productive time, and other




time is 7 percent.  Therefore, the total collection time for packer




trucks is:






          Collection Time =  1.64 x (Productive Time)






     Similarly, for dump trucks, the waiting time is 38 percent and the




other time is 7 percent of the productive time.  The collection time




can be calculated as:






          Collection Time =  1.45 x (Productive Time)
                                   58

-------
     The total collection time per "typical" mile, using a packer truck,




is therefore 55-61 min.  A dump truck will take 132.52 min. to collect




the same mile--76.9' min. longer than a packer truck, or 238 percent




as much time to collect each mile.  The difference is principally due




to the increased  loading height of the dump trucks and the longer time




necessary to unload each can.




     Times to empty individual storage containers were recorded.  Timing




was begun when the can was lifted from the ground or stand and was




terminated when the container was returned.  The results show that the




average time to empty a 55~gal drum into a packer truck was 0.18 min.




The 32-gal containers were emptied into packer trucks in an average




of 0.14 min--a time savings of 22 percent over the 55~gal containers.




Since it was found that the average 55~gal drum contained only ^ cu ft




of waste (Table 6), which is comparable to the volume of a 32-gal




container, it must be assumed that the shorter emptying time is prin-




cipally due to the fact that 32-gal containers are more maneuverable




and easier to handle than 55~gal drums.




     The normal practice of collection crews is to get the truck as




close as possible to the storage containers.  Such practice is a direct




outgrowth of the use of the large, difficu1t-to-handle, 55"§al drums.




     If 32-gal containers could be used exclusively, it would be possible




for the truck to proceed down the middle or one side of the road, stopping




where necessary for the containers to be carried to  it.  The time-consuming




practice of backing the truck to get near containers would then be




elimirated.







                                  59

-------
     Although no clear cut picture of the savings involved can be

drawn, an attempt was made to measure the decrease in collection

time that would result from eliminating truck backups.  Over a dis-

tance of 0.2 miles with 19 services, two backups were made by the

collection truck.  The driving time involved was 3-0 min.  When the

truck was driven down the center of the street, stopping at all

services but not attempting to get close to the containers, the

driving time was 2.0 min.   This is a saving of 33 percent in collec-

tion time.

     The weighing of residential waste showed that the average item

set out for collection weighed 59 lb, with a low reading of k lb

and a high of 158 lb.  The average weight of loaded containers was

65 lb.  The average empty weight of these same containers was L\2 lb.

Thus the waste (23 lb per container) weighed only 35 percent of the

weight of the full containers.

     The loading height of the Garwood* packers is 2.9 ft (Figure 15).

The top-loading packer trucks have a loading height of 3-0 ft (Figure

16).  The Chevrolet" dump trucks have a loading height of 3-8 ft with

the tailgate down (Figure 17), 5-0 ft with the tailgate up, and 7-8

ft when loaded over the side  (Figure 18).  Therefore, the work (weight

multiplied by distance moved)  involved  in loading a container into

a dump truck is either 30, 70, or 170 percent greater than the work

in loading a packer truck, depending on where the containers are

loaded into the dump trucks.
     -''Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the
U.S. Public Health Service.


                                   60

-------
Figure 15-   Loading a packer truck (note yard wastes).
  Figure  16.   Loading  a  top-loading  packer  truck.
                         61

-------
Figure  17.  Loading a dump truck (tailgate down).
Figure 18.   Loading a dump truck over the side.
                     62

-------
     The 32-gal galvanized containers commonly used for home storage




have an average empty weight of about 10 lb.  Their use would reduce




the effort of the refuse collectors by 32 lb per container, or 49




percent.  Plastic 32-gal containers weigh about 4 lb apiece.  Their




use would eliminate 38  lb of excess container weight, or 58 percent




of the present full weight.  Paper or plastic bags weigh practically




nothing and would eliminate container weight entirely.  They would




result in a work savings of 65 percent over 55~gal drums.






                          Sol id Waste Disposal






     The solid waste collection crews dispose of the collected waste




at five open dumps (located on the map of Guam in Figure 19).




     The Yigo Dump (Figure 20) receives  the waste from Yigo, Dededo,




and Tamuning.  It is located within sight of the highway to Andersen




Air Force Base.  There  is no operational  equipment at this dump,  nor




is there an operator or caretaker.  Fires burn continually, and the




smoke is generally carried into the village of Yigo.




     Near Ordot is the  largest of the five dumps (Figures 21-22).  The




Ordot Dump receives the waste from the populous middle section of  the




island.   One bulldozer  is at this site and an operator is on duty




8 hr a day.  The operator directs the trucks to the dumping area,  and




the dozer pushes the waste to the edge of the filled area, where  it




is burned.
                                  63

-------
                                                     Andersen

                                                    Air Force Bo
                                     0   12   3  4Miles
                                        H    e	1 Z3


                                        DISPOSAL SITE
                  1NARAJAN
Figure 19-  Solid  waste disposal sites  on Guam.

-------
Figure 20.  Yigo Dump.
Figure 21.   Ordot Dump.
            65

-------
Figure 22.  Filled area of Or dot Dump.
       Figure  23.   Agat Dump.,
                   66

-------
     The dump at Agat (Figure 23) receives waste from Agat and Santa




Rita, and like the other dumps,  it is usually burning.  A caretaker




is on duty to direct trucks to the dumping area.




     Overlooking picturesque Umatac Bay is the Umatac Dump, which




receives waste from both Umatac  and Merizo.  Because of the small quan-




tities of waste, burning is not  usually practiced.  Instead, the paper




is allowed to blow away.




     The Inarajan Dump  is located adjacent to the Inarajan water storage




tank and receives waste from Inarajan and Talofofo.  Burning is not




common but does occur at times.




     In addition to the waste hauled by the collection crews, many




businesses haul their own waste  to the dumps.  The Ordot, Yigo, and




Agat dumps receive most of these commercial wastes.




     Scavenging is prohibited by law, but is practiced at all dumps.




Ordot and Yigo were the two dumps where this was most evident.




     The Government of Guam has  proposed the closing of all five dumps




and the establishment of one or  possibly two sanitary landfills.  It




is recommended that this measure be undertaken as soon as possible. Aside




from the health problems that burning dumps encourage by allowing rodents




and insects access to the waste, by possibly polluting water supplies




with runoff from the dump, and by polluting the air with burning mate-




rials,  there is also the esthetic offensiveness of litter and smoke.




     It would be difficult, however,  to eliminate the outlying dis-




posal sites until  the present dump trucks  could be replaced by packer
                                  67

-------
trucks.  The smaller capacity of the dump trucks  limits their effec-




tiveness as collection vehicles  if they must travel  long distances




to disposal sites.   This consideration adds extra emphasis  to the




acquisition of high-capacity collection vehicles.






            Management of Solid  Waste^ Collection  and Disposal






     Organizat ion.   Solid waste  collection and disposal is  the respon-




sibility of the Department of Public Works.  Since the Department is




undergoing a series of organizational changes at  the present time, it




is difficult to state what its structure is or will  be.  At the time




of the study, however, the Refuse Division was organized with the col-




lection crews under the direction of three area supervisors.  The super-




visors, who were new to the position and had no previous experience




in solid waste management, were  directly responsible to the Chief En-




gineer, who in turn was responsible to the Director of the  Department




of Public Works.  Since the time of the study, one of the supervisors




has become head of the Refuse Division and now has charge of the




collect ion crews.



     The operator  and bulldozer  at the Ordot Dump are loaned to the




Refuse Division by the Highway Division.  The operator's salary and




the equipment costs are borne by the Division of  Highways,  and there-




fore, are not shown as part of the budget of the  Refuse Division.




     Equipment maintenance is performed by the Equipment Shop of the




Department of Public Works.  No obtainable records are kept that




would allow the assignment of a vehicle operating cost to collection




trucks .




                                   68

-------
     Considerable delay  is often experienced  in obtaining equipment




repairs, primarily because of the  low priority given collection ve-




hicles  (below school buses and police cars).  There are about  1 40




school  buses and only  10 operational collection trucks.   It  is easy




to see  how repairs on  a collection vehicle could be delayed  quite




a while with such a ratio.




     Another cause for delay in obtaining repairs  is the  time  that




it takes to order spare parts from the U.S. mainland.  Because of




the long order time, one of the top-loading trucks is slowly being




cannibalized to keep the other two running.




     Manpower.  Three  men are assigned to each collection truck. The




10 operational trucks  thus require 10 drivers and  20 collectors.  Nine




additional  men work the second shift.




     Drivers are usually paid a beginning salary of $3,588 and col-




lectors, $3,172 (Table 16).  Pay increases have been proposed  in the




fiscal  year 1970 budget; the new level is to be set by the Legislature.




     Crews  report for work at 7 a.m. and leave on  their routes as soon




as possible.  Quitting time is 3:30 p.m., and the  crews are  allowed




a half  hour for lunch.  If a member is absent, many crews do not leave




the Public Works compound until  7:30 a.m. or  later because they must




wait until  a new man is assigned to them.  Absenteeism reportedly is




high.    Second shift operation begins at 3:30 p.m.  and stops  at 12




midnight.  Crews are usually kept intact as a unit — that  is, they




work on the same truck and collect the same routes weekly.
                                   69

-------
Q.
0)o
            -3"    •— r-v CN  r-^
                                                                  . r--. r-- co co co cncno o
                        CN -3" CN O CO \O -3" CM  CN  CM CM CN -
                                                                  \D COOCNCNCNCNCNCNJCNCN
                                                                   r^coo'— o cr\ co r--- o> •—  c^
                                                                        "         ~
CL
ojoo
                                                         criLr\vDr--.coo'---
                                                         ocxiLnco — -a-co — LrvoocsvO'—
            Q.
            cu r
            4-j
           eo
                        CNJCO-TO (N-TCMO<3OxO-^J-cNrslCJCN  (N-TvDCO  OCvJCNj  CNtcN
                        r^co-^ooo\^i^c»coo^o^r^racnLr\'^or^.coO'— ocnco
                        -TLr\r^.cno4LAco— -^rco
a:
o
                               LAr-^cr\o
                                                            -
                                               rococo cr\o™~
                                              i-^rvoco o f^Ln
                                                                          CNJLACO  — -TOO —  unco
a:
<
             CN CM CN CO -3" O CN -3- CN O CO \£> -3-
             f^- O ro CO -3" O CO vO l^~- OO CO  CTi O
                                               i  o m
                                                                                       VJ3 CO O  C"^ OJ
                                                                                       r>-oo o  •— o
                                                                                LACO «— -3"co  — un
             CNICM  CN
             — -3-  r-.
             cno  —
                                                         t^-coco o^o  —
                                                                                    CN LACO  — -3~co
            ro  c
            cu  n3
                                                                                       CNCNcNCNC-4
                                               70

-------
     Leg i s lat ion.   Solid waste collection and disposal on Guam is




governed by Subchapter Q of the Government Code of Guam, entitled




"Garbage and Rubbish" (Appendix H), and by Chapter 55 of Title XXXII,




entitled "Housing  Code."  These acts provide that:




     1.  Garbage should be stored in durable, metal containers.




     2.  Waste receptacles must be tightly covered while stored.




     3.  Rubbish may be bundled.




     4.  No waste  can be disposed of except in authorized public dumps,




     5.  No open burning can be done within i mile of any urban area.




     6.  The Department of Public Works will collect and dispose of




         soli d waste.




     7.  Solid waste cannot be transported in open vehicles unless pro-




         visions are made to keep waste in the vehicle.




     8.  The Director of Public Works has the authority to prescribe




         additional regulations concerning storage containers.




     9.  No persons except those having material to dump shall be per-




         mitted on any public dump.




    10.  Collection shall be furnished in all village and urban areas




         without charge to private residences.




     Budget.  The  proposed budget for the Refuse Division for fiscal




year 1970  is $520,312--about 9 percent of the total proposed budget




of the Department  of Public Works.  It ranks behind schools, whose




allotment  has been set at $3>1^6»939> anc' highways, whose budget  is




at $863,512.
                                   71

-------
     The Refuse Division's budget for fiscal  year 1969 is $259,197,

or 5-5 percent of the total  for the Department.   The fiscal  year 1968

budget was $217,^75, or 6.6 percent of the total.  These figures show

not only the monetary increase in the Division's budget, but also the

increase in awareness of the importance of solid waste management as

reflected in the percentage increase from about  6 percent in 1968 and

1969 to 9 percent for FY 1970.

     Resources for the Refuse Division are primarily obtained from

tax funds.  No charges are made for residential  clients.  Businesses

desiring collection more frequently than once a  week can contract with

the Department and pay for additional collection.


                Solid Waste Management on Military Bases


     The United States Navy and Air Force are the largest employers

on Guam.  There is also a sizeable population of military personnel

and dependents on the island.  Solid waste on the bases is collected

and disposed of by the respective commands.  Agana Naval Station and

Andersen Air Force Base are the two largest installations and, there-

fore, produce the largest amounts of waste.

     Naval Operat ions.  The Navy uses four collection systems:

     1.  Dempster Dumpster* units are used at the port area and other

         work areas and are emptied on call when full.

     2.  Dempster Dumpmaster* units are used in housing and office areas

          (Figures 2k  and 25).  One bulk container is used for  four
     "Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by
the U.S. Public Health Service.
                                   72

-------
    Figure 24.   Bulk containers  (Naval  Station).
Figure 25-   Large bulk container (Naval  Station)
                       73

-------
         houses, and each is situated on a concrete pad.   They are

         serviced with front-loading packer trucks and are regularly

         cleaned and periodically repaired.  Specially built trailers

         are used to transport the containers to a central repair

         and cleaning site.   Cleaning is done with hot water and

         detergent.   Each unit can be tilted by hand while on the

         trailer and can therefore be cleaned without being removed.

         In an effort to extend the life of the containers, each

         new one is  reinforced and painted inside with an epoxy coating.

         Observation of the  Navy system indicates that maintenance

         and cleaning are important aspects of using bulk containers

         in residential areas.

     3.  Galvanized  can storage is used in the Commissioned Officer's

         housing area.  Two  cans are provided per house,  and they are

         serviced by rear-loading packer trucks,

     4.  Transfer trailers with self-contained compacting mechanisms

         are used at two sites:  (a) at the commissary (Figure 26) where

         large amounts of cardboard packaging waste is produced and

         (b) near the port area and other work areas where some of the

         Dempster Dumpster*  units are emptied into the transfer trailer.

     A disposal method once  used by the Navy was a "shark pit."  Food

waste from the dining areas  was dumped down a chute into the sea

(Figure 21}.  Now, however,  a sanitary  landfill  is operated on the Naval

Station (Figure 28), and a new  landfill has recently been opened on  the
     "Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by
the U.S. Public Health Service.


                                   7**

-------
   Figure  26.  Stationary compactor  (Naval Station).
Figure 27.   "Shark pit" disposal  site (Naval  Station)
                       75

-------
  Figure  28.   Sanitary  landfill  (Naval  Station).
Figure 29.   Disposal  of waste oils (Naval  Station)
                         76

-------
Naval Air Station.  Galley wastes are disposed of by contract to a pig




farmer.




     Waste oils are disposed of by burning whenever the need arises.




This practice contributes to air pollution and is esthetically objec-




tionable (Figure 29).




     The Navy reportedly disposed of 650,000 cu yd of solid waste per




year.  If the density of commercial waste of 5-6 Ib per cu ft is




assumed for this waste, this volume is equivalent to about 48,000 tons




per year.  Of this amount, 83 percent goes to the Naval Station land-




fill, and 17 percent goes to the landfill at the Naval Air Station.




     Andersen Air Force Base.  The Air Force uses bulk containers




(Figure 30)  for waste storage in work areas and on the flight line.




Individual  cans and rear-loading packers are used in housing areas.




The containers are carried to the dump and emptied into a previously




dug trench (Figure 30-  Waste in the trenches is burned and the




trenches are covered when filled with the noncombustible materials




and ash (Figure 32).  Bulky wastes, including packaging materials,




are hauled to a different site and burned (Figure 33).




     The Air Force estimates its yearly waste production at 390,8^0 cu




yd.  At a density of 5-6 Ib per cu ft, this becomes about 30,000 tons




per year.  Figures for both the Navy and Air Force are based on the




assumption that all containers are full when collected.  It is there-




fore reasonable to assume that the actual amounts of waste are some-




what lower than reported.
                                   77

-------
      Figure  30.   Storage  containers  (Andersen  Air  Force  Base)
Figure 31.   Trench landfill  operation (Andersen Air Force Base)
                              78

-------
      Figure 32.   Burned waste (Andersen Air Force Base)
Figure 33.  Dump for bomb cartons (Andersen Air Force Base)
                             79

-------
                               REFERENCES
1. Ward, P. E., S.  H. Hoffard,  and D.  A.  Davis.   Hydrology of Guam.
     Geological Survey Professional  Paper 403~H.   Washington, U.S.
     Government Printing Office,  1965.  28 p.

2. Bureau of Solid  Waste Management, Division  of  Technical Operations.
     Unpub1ished data.

3. Black, R.  J., A. J. Munich,  A.  J. Klee, H.  L.  Hickman,  Jr., and
     R. D. Vaughan.  The national  solid wastes survey;  an  interim
     report.    [Cincinnati], U.S.  Department of Health,  Education,
     and Welfare, [1968].   53 p.

k. A technical services report; comprehensive  solid waste  study,  Johnson
     City, Tennessee.  Cincinnati, U.S. Department of Health, Educa-
     tion, and Welfare, 1968.  63  p.  [Restricted distribution.]

5. Spooner, C. S.  Study of recreation solid wastes for the U.S.  De-
     partment of Agriculture Forest Service.  Public Health Service
     Publication No. 1991.   Washington, U.S. Government Printing
     Office,  1969.   131* p.   (In press.)

6. Black, R.  J.  Solid wastes handling.  Jhn_ Envi ronmental  aspects of
     the hospital,   v. 2.   Supportive departments.  Public Health
     Service Publication No. 930-C-16.  Washington, U.S.  Government
     Printing Office,  196?.  p. 20-27.  Reprinted as Solid wastes
     handling  in hospitals.  Cincinnati,  U.S.  Department  of Health,
     Education, and Welfare, 1968.  9 P-
                                  80

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS






     This study required the cooperation of many people and organi-




zations.  The Division of Technical Operations extends sincere appre-




ciation to the personnel of the Department of Public Works, to the




Department of Health and Social Services, and to the village commis-




sioners for their help and encouragement during the course of the study,




Our thanks go also to Mr. Denver Dickerson, Secretary of Guam and




Acting Governor during the period of the study, for his assistance and




interest.




     In particular, we wish to acknowledge the cooperation of Richard




A. Coddington, Environmental Health Administrator, and Thomas Yamamoto,




Chief Engineer, Department of Public Works.  Special thanks go to




Jose C. Guerrero and Benny Perez for their help during the study.




Jesus G. Soriano and Gangalo A. Garcia also provided needed assistance.




     The personnel of the Division of Technical Operations and the




Bureau of Solid Waste Management who have helped in the preparation of




this report are also gratefully acknowledged.
                                 81

-------

-------
APPENDI   CES

-------

-------
                               APPENDIX A

                        REPORT OF OBSERVATIONS ON
                    SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
                      ISLAND OF GUAM, NOVEMBER 1968

                          by Dona 1d M. Keagy-
                           and Jack DeMarccr
I.    Introduction

     In August, 1967, the Department of Public Health and Welfare,
Government of Guam, submitted an application to the Public Health Ser-
vice for a solid waste disposal demonstration project grant.  Since
that time a number of written and verbal exchanges of communication
occurred between members of the two agencies relative to the problem
in general and the application in particular.  Although the application
was disapproved, there was a mutual recognition of the need for tech-
nical consultation to the Government of Guam by the Solid Wastes
Program, Environmental Control Administration, Public Health Service,
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.  Accordingly, the Regional
Program Chief, Region 9, and the Deputy Chief, Technical Services,
authors of this report, made a field visit to Guam August 4-7,  1968,
for the purpose of making a general assessment of the solid waste situ-
ation on the  Island.  At the conclusion of the visit, we promised to
provide a report of our findings and recommendations.

     We were accompanied the entire time by Mr. Richard Coddington, En-
vironmental Health Administrator, Department of Public Health and Welfare.
A tour of the Island was made which afforded views of representative
storage conditions of all five of the open-dump disposal sites  for the
civilian population.  Although study of the Navy and Air Force  solid
waste disposal systems was not originally scheduled or planned, ad-
vantage was taken of the opportunity afforded to visit and become
acquainted with the situation at Andersen Air Force Base and the Navy
base.  Interviews were held with key officials in the Department of
Public Works, but regrettably, the weather precluded a planned  direct
observation of collection practices employed by that Department.  A
    --At the time of the report Mr. Keagy was serving as Regional
Program Chief, Region IX, Solid Wastes Program.  He is currently
the special assistant to the Commissioner for Regional Operations,
Region IX.
    ^Mr.  DeMarco was formerly Deputy Chief, Technical Services, Solid
Wastes Program.  He is now serving as Deputy Director, Division of
Technical  Operations, Bureau of Solid Waste Management.

                                  85

-------
significant amount of time for dialogue was kindly made available from
time to time by the Acting Director of Public Health and Welfare.  Ad-
vantage was taken of an opportunity to meet with 10 of the District
Commissioners for about 1  hr at the time of one of their regular meet-
ings.  Lastly, the visitors accompanied Mr. Sanchez, Mr. Coddington,
and Mr. Perez, and were afforded the opportunity to have a l?-hr
conversation with Governor Manuel  Guerrero on this subject.  All of
the persons contacted were most generous with their time, coopera-
tion, and sharing of information and data.

     This report is the product of not only first-hand observations
but also a rather careful  later analysis of the volume of data and
information collected during the visit, including the January 1966
report of Eldon P. Savage  and the September 1967 "Reorganization
Plan—Solid Waste Disposal" prepared by Albert E. Bertram.

     In general, it can be said that the Public Health Service team
concluded that the 1966 and 1967 reports of Savage and Bertram pro-
vided basic and useful  data and information to the extent feasible
under the circumstances.

     This report should be viewed as an amplification of and supple-
ment to those two reports.
II.  Fi ndi ngs

     A.  GOVERNMENT OF GUAM

     Storage

         The general condition of solid wastes storage on the Island
         of Guam is highly unsatisfactory.  The following observations
         were made during our brief visit.

         1.   The prevalent type of residential storage container ob-
              served was the 55~gal drum, without cover.  In our dis-
              cussions we were informed that holes were routinely
              punched in the bottom of the drums to prevent water from
              collect i ng in them.

         2.   Only  in the community of Merizo did we observe any wide-
              spread attempts to provide covers for the 55~gal drums.
              Although this was an indication of a willingness to up-
              grade conditions, the 55~gal drum is not amenable to the
              type of tight-fitting cover required for a satisfactory
              storage container.
                                  86

-------
3.   The container showed evidence that frequent cleaning
     was not a general practice.  The size and shape of the
     55~gal containers do not lend themselves to easy cleaning.

it.   In addition to the 55~gal drums, make-shift containers,
     such as cardboard cartons, were observed in use.

5.   The 55-gal storage containers provided a difficult situ-
     ation for handling by the householder and the collection
     crew.

6.   The storage areas observed at some residences and com-
     mercial districts frequently amounted to open dumping.

7.   Large numbers of flies were observed at many storage
     areas .

8.   Evidence was observed that open burning was practiced at
     some storage areas.

9.   The location of residential storage containers at the
     curb  line of streets does not provide an aesthetic
     attraction to the Island of Guam.  Unsightly solid waste
     storage areas provide an incongruous and demoralizing
     effect where residents are attempting to improve the
     beauty of thei r homes and overal1 appearance of the!r com-
     muni t ies .

Col lection
     The collection service provided by the Public Works
Department was the object of island-wide complaints.  The
complaints seemed to be well founded on the basis of the
lack of adequate planning, supervision, and equipment nec-
essary to provide a satisfactory system.  The following
observations were made:

1.   The personnel were reported to have a high amount of
     absenteeism.  This amounts to approximately 20 percent
     of the work force being absent each day.  Personnel with
     medical dispensations were employed because of difficul-
     ties in securing people for the vacancies posted.

2.   The lack of supervision of employees is evidenced by the
     vacancy existing in the full-time superintendent position
     for the garbage and trash division.  Employee orientation
                         87

-------
     and safety programs cannot be adequately carried on with-
     out the supervisory personnel required.

3.   The three 18-cu-yd, front-end-loading packer trucks
     were reported to be in poor condition.   Only one or
     two were reported to be kept in service  because of
     maintenance requirements.   The packer type of equip-
     ment is acceptable for a collection system, but the
     number available should be sufficient so that a proper
     maintenance and service program will  not interfere
     with the normal operations of the system.  The two
     additional packer trucks reported to have been ordered
     will not likely satisfy the requirements for an adequate
     number of vehi cles.

b.   The five to seven open body trucks in use are not a
     suitable type for collecting solid wastes with an
     organic fraction.  In addition to the objection from
     a public health viewpoint, these vehicles pose problems
     to the safe and efficient  handling of solid wastes.

5.   The daily records of the collection system operation.,
     although helpful, were not adequate for  evaluating its
     effectiveness,  nor for use in revising the present col-
     lection system to meet future needs.

6.   An evaluation of the routes and methods  used was not
     available.  It seemed evident that no attempt was made
     to evaluate or re-evaluate the efficiency of the present
     system for the purpose of  optimizing its operation, even
     with its known deficiencies such as lack of equipment.

7.   A route map of the collection system was not available.
     A route map, along with daily operation  records and a
     periodic evaluation serves as an operational method of
     maintaining a proper collection system.

8.   The present collection system is not responsible to the
     justifiable complaints of  the public.  The District
     Commissioners reported that solid waste  collection was
     the subject of their most  frequent complaints.  They ad-
     vised that in their opinion, the public  is willing to
     pay a fee to receive proper collection service.  An im-
     proved system would have to be put into  effect before
     such a fee could be assessed.
                         88

-------
    9-    The frequency of collection of residential  solid wastes,
         although planned for once a week,  was reported to be
         irregular and less than once a week in actual  practice.
         It was reported that one 55~gal drum per week  is the
         amount that collectors are instructed to collect.
         The amount of solid wastes noted at the residences in
         many instances was more than could be contained in one
         55~gal drum or an equivalent number of smaller containers,
         This would indicate that the current frequency of collec-
         tion and/or limitation on the amount collected is inade-
         quate for the needs of the public.

    D isposal

         The five land disposal sites visited all classify as
    open-burning dumps.  These sites are the classical  type at
    which nuisances, vectors, obnoxious smoke and odors, are
    insults to the general public.  Also they are needless deg-
    radations of the environment.  Roadside dumping  was observed
    at  various locations on the Island.  Junked automobiles were
    also prevalent in many locations.  Solid waste disposal prac-
    tices on the Island of Guam are in need of major improvement.

    Management

         A proper solid waste system requires supervision of each
    facet of the system along with overall  supervision  to insure
    that the component parts are integrated into an  efficient
    solid waste management system.  Thus, the key to starting
    and maintaining an efficient solid waste storage,  collection,
    and disposal system is good management.  This lack  of manage-
    ment is one of the major causes for the poor solid  waste
    practices on the Island of Guam.

B.  MILITARY

         A brief visit to the Naval Air Station and  Andersen Air
    Force Base was made to observe their solid waste management
    pract ices .

    Naval Ai r Station

         In general, their collection system seemed  adequate and
    the storage areas appeared neat and sanitary on  the day of our
    visit.   Front-end, container-loading packer vehicles are used.
    There seemed to be adequate supervision to maintain a con-
    stant check on their system.

-------
              The  previous  ocean-dumping  practice  (shark  pit)  is  re-
         ported  to have  been  discontinued,  and  sanitary  landfilling  is
         their current disposal  method.   Discussions  and  a  brief  visit
         to their  operation indicated  that  daily cover,  no  open burning,
         and  other proper sanitary  landfill  techniques were being utilized.
         The  site  has  reportedly been  operated  as  a  sanitary landfill for
         approximately k months  with  the  purpose of  reclaiming  low-lying
         lands .

         Andersen  Air  Force Base

              Our  brief  visit to this  Air Force installation resulted  in
         the  following observations:

         1.    Records  of the  collection system  operation  are kept.

         2.    Rear-end  loaders  are  used.

         3.    Backyard collection is  provided.

         k.    Twice-weekly  collection  is  provided  for housing units.

         5.    Garbage  from  dining halls is  collected  daily.

         6.    Dempster Dumpster* storage  containers  are  placed  at other
              locations  and are  collected using a  "call  system."

         7.    Dempster Dumpster* containers are scheduled for weekly
              clean!ng.

         8.    An entomology unit conducts a cleaning program for  con-
              tainers, collection vehicles, and storage  areas.

         9.    The  disposal  operations  were  carried on at  several
              locations, with open  burning  practiced  at  each.   One site
              was  a trench-type  operation,  where the burned solid wastes
              were covered  periodically.


III.  Discussion  of Findings

     A.   GENERAL

              The  most significant  conclusion we have drawn from  our
         observations  and findings  is  that  there  is  insufficient  data
         available to  properly develop a  comprehensive solid waste
         management plan for  Guam.   This  is not to say that a number
     -Mention of commercial  products  does  not imply  endorsement by
the U.S.  Public Health Service.
                                 90

-------
    of significant activities cannot be initiated immediately
    to ameliorate the problem but that sooner or later consider-
    ably more data will need to have been collected before the
    Government of Guam can achieve an optimum solid waste man-
    agement system.

         Many of the observations pointed out in the previous sec-
    tion have been brought to the attention of the Government of
    Guam in both a study conducted by the Public Health Service by
    Mr. Eldon Savage (1966) and also in a proposed reorganization
    plan for Guam's Solid Wastes Disposal Program prepared by
    Mr. Albert E. Bertram, Sr., Sanitary Engineer on assignment
    with the Government of Guam.  The consensus of these pre-
    vious two reports is in general  agreement with our observa-
    tions,  in that all  phases of solid waste management on the
    Island  of Guam indicate a lack of adequate planning, super-
    vision, and financial resources  to appropriately cope with
    the solid waste problems on Guam.  This situation should not
    be allowed to continue.  Continuing study of the problems will
    not result in an upgrading of general conditions, unless
    these studies are backed to every degree possible by an
    action  program.

B.  SPECIFIC

    1 .   Government of Guam

         Storage

              The obvious result of  the poor storage practices
         being followed on Guam is the unsightly conditions present
         in most storage areas observed.   The not so obvious, but
         yet more important results  of these poor storage prac-
         tices,  are the influences that they may have on public
         health and also the efficiency of the collection system.

              It is common knowledge that flies and other vectors
         are attracted to and proliferate in solid wastes.  The
         function of proper storage  is to minimize these breeding
         grounds in every way possible so as to prevent nuisances
         and potential  health hazards to the public.   Open storage
         containers,  containers with holes, open dumping of solid
         wastes,  make-shift containers, and unclean or uncleanable
         storage containers are all  conditions which directly
         oppose the achievement of the goals of good storage prac-
         tices.   Since all of the improper conditions exist in the
         present system, there should be little doubt as to the need
         for rectifying the situation.
                             91

-------
     A further consideration of proper storage is the
effect that it has on the efficiency of the collection
system. If more than one proper storage practice can be
followed,  it is only good planning to select that method
which most aptly aids the proper collection of solid
wastes. The 55~gal storage container, as well as the other
storage practices present in Guam, do not aid collection
efficiency, but rather deter it.  Thus, the unmanageable
55~gal storage containers, along with aiding and abetting
nuisance problems, etc., promotes an inefficient collection
system on Guam.

     To promote a more aesthetic appearing community,
many communities keep their containers at locations other
than the curb line in front of houses.  This entails either
the homeowner placing the container at the collection
point on the assigned day or that a set-out and set-back,
or backyard-carry collection system be provided.  Before
Guam can change the location of its storage containers,
it must carefully consider the impact it will have on the
collection system.  It would seem that until the 55-gal
containers can be abolished and a regular frequency of
collection can be established, the current storage con-
tainer location should be maintained.  The environmental
health group could institute a program of educating the
public on effective ways of maintaining proper storage
areas.  This would include information on topics such
as storage racks, methods and materials for cleaning
containers, and the need for wrapping putrescible frac-
tions such as food wastes.  The sanitarians on Guam
would seem to be capable of providing the guidance re-
qu i red.

Collect ion

     The interrelationship between proper storage and col-
lection was pointed out  in the reports by Savage and
Bertram.  We would strongly remind the Government of Guam
that no amount of effort to upgrade storage areas and
practices will succeed without a proper collection ser-
vice.  Thus, the suggested improvements in storage prac-
tices will not prevent environmental health problems if
the solid wastes are not routinely collected from these
areas.  The current collection system on Guam must be
considered as a major obstacle  in upgrading solid waste
management on the Island.  The previously stated findings

-------
indicate some of the shortcomings observed during our brief
visit.  It is not the purpose here to attempt to design
an adequate system, but rather to emphasize the gross ne-
glect observed during our visit.  An efficiently run collec-
tion system cannot be initiatsd or maintained with only a
token gesture of interest in its success.  Consequently,
adequate supervision in all  phases of the collection system
as well as storage and disposal is a fundamental require-
ment that must be resolved by the Government of Guam.  Upon
providing adequate supervision for a collection system, it
can undertake the maximum use of the existing resources and
che development of required additional resources.  Even if
che maximum use could be made of the existing equipment,
it is doubtful that proper collection service could be
provided.  It is apparent that the collection equipment
currently used on Guam is not sufficient to accomplish
proper collection.  Additional appropriate type packer
vehicles will be required as was pointed out in previous
reports.  These collection vehicles, along with appropriate
containers, should help to reduce the problems of excessive
absenteeism now experienced.  Proper loading heights help
to reduce unnecessary strain on the collection crew and
can help to maintain a happier work force.

     Other items of an effective collection system will
also have to be initiated.  This includes items such as
routing maps and periodic evaluations, daily records,
maintenance programs, safety and training programs, and
established collection frequencies.  The routing of col-
lection vehicles will depend on what decision is made as
to the disposal site or sites that Guam is to utilize.

Disposal

     An unsatisfactory method of using land for disposal
on Guam was prevalent.   All  of the classical problems
previously mentioned in the findings can be minimized by
following proper sanitary landfill practices.  The use of
five proper sanitary landfill disposal sites would not
be necessary  if one central  site could be located.  Pre-
vious reports seem in conflict as to whether transfer op-
erations are necessary or not.  Nevertheless, the reports
are in agreement that one central disposal site near Ordot
would be appropriate. Proper equipment and procedures must
be utilized so that satisfactory and even exemplary oper-
ations can be insured.  Selection of a disposal  site will
                    93

-------
              have  an  impact  on  the  collection  system.   Therefore,  con-
              sideration  of  the  collection  and  disposal  system  should
              not be  performed  independently  of one  another.

              Management

                   Good management cannot be  over-stressed  in correcting
              the evils of  poor  solid  waste storage,  collection,  and
              disposal practices.   If  one component  of  the  overall  solid
              waste management system  receives  little attention,  the
              operation of  the other components may  well  face problems
              that  raise  cost and decrease  effectiveness.   This was
              pointed  out for the storage-collection operations,  but
              can be  equally  true of the collection-disposal operations.
              Therefore,  the  overall system of  storage,  collection, and
              disposal should be kept  in mind when  improvements are in-
              itiated.
         2.    Military
                   The  results  of  site  visits  to  the  Federal  facilities
              indicated  that  the Government  of Guam could  benefit  from a
              liaison with  the  solid  waste management personnel  located
              at  these  installations.   The storage, collection,  and  dis-
              posal  practices  in general  on  the military establishments
              were superior to  those  observed  elsewhere on the  Island.
              The Navy  sanitary landfill  operation observed could  serve
              as  an illustration of what  the Government of Guam  could
              accomplish with  the  proper  motivation.   Similar in-
              stances of an improved  storage collection practice
              could also be observed  on the  military  installations.
              There seemed  to  be a willingness on the part of all
              concerned  to  cooperate  in discussions of their mutual
              problems.
IV.   Recommendations

     It is  recommended  that  the Government of  Guam:

         1.    Assign  a  high  priority to resolution  of its  solid waste
              management problem.

         2.    Provide the necessary increase in  personnel,  facilities,
              and funds to accomplish proper solid  waste management
              practices in Guam which includes:

              a.   Achievement of the long range  goal  of development of
                  a comprehensive  solid waste  management plan,  and

-------
     b.  Achievement of short range goals of improvements of
         current practices.

3.   Initiate action as soon as possible to achieve the long
     range goal of development of a comprehensive solid waste
     management plan by either:

     a.  Contracting with one of several consulting engineering
         firms currently available in the U.S., or

     b.  Utilizing the staff of Guam's solid waste management
         agency with whatever assistance the Solid Wastes Pro-
         gram can provide within the limit of its resources.

k.   Initiate action as soon as possible to achieve the
     following short range goals toward improvement of
     current practices:

     a.  Abolish use of 55~gal containers in favor of con-
         tainers that are totally enclosed,  easily cleanable
         (or one-time use), durably constructed, and easily
         handled by one man.

     b.  Promulgate instructions or regulations for the
         propef cleaning of reuseable containers.

     c.  Promulgate instructions or regulations for the
         proper support of containers or suitable racks or
         storage posts.

     d.  Permit an adequate number of containers so as to allow
         storage of all solid waste in proper containers at
         each collection point.

     e.  Exert a concerted effort to fill the vacancy of
         supervisor of the collection crews.

     f.  Identify on a large scale map each source of solid
         waste (point of generation)  on the Island identified
         as to type of source (i.e. household,  commercial, ed-
         ucational institution, public building, industry, gov-
         ernment building, hospital,  recreation area, airport,
         agriculture, etc.) and as to whether collection, if
         provided, is by private or public collector.

     g.  Identify on a transparent overlay of this map the
         current daily route of each collection vehicle.

-------
h.  On the basis of this map, evaluate collection ser-
    vices currently being provided and revise collection
    routes so as to provide reasonable and uniform ser-
    vices—putrescible wastes should be collected at
    least twice a week whenever and wherever possible.

i.  Explore the feasibility of augmenting the currently
    insufficient collection equipment and manpower through
    the utilization of private collection services.

j.  Exert a concerted effort to identify the cause of
    delay in delivery of the (three) new packer trucks
    ordered in FY 1968 and to expedite their delivery.

k.  Select a central disposal site and operate it as a
    sanitary landfill.

1.  Discontinue the practice of using the existing open-
    burning dumps, and initiate proper dump-closing
    procedures, which include a vector elimination pro-
    gram, compaction and grading of the waste material,
    and application of at least 2 ft of compacted earth
    cover graded to promote good drainage.

m.  Outlaw open burning and indiscriminate dumping.

n.  Review and amend, as necessary, existing statutes
    and regulations so as to be consistent with these
    recommendations.
                    96

-------
                                APPENDIX B

             SAMPLE SIZE TO DETERMINE SOLID WASTE DENSITIES
     This analysis is related to the mathematical concepts and  tech-
niques used to develop the suggested number of samples for determination
of solid waste densities.

     Based upon the exact formula for constructing a confidence  interval
about an average ratio, the following approximation is considered appli-
cable to solid waste studies:

                                 t2 V(A)
                             n =  a
                                 B262

where n    = sample size
      ta   = constant obtained from a t-table at an a.% risk  level
      V(A) = variance of the numerator of the ratio involved  (ib)
      B    = the average of the denominator of the ratio  involved (cu yd)
      (S    = required sensitivity (& = one-half the maximum  confidence
             interval desired about the average ratio)
     It is recognized that few investigators will have an adequate
estimate of either V(A) or B.  Studies in the Cincinnati area have
found,  however, that in almost 90 percent of all cases, the quantity
V(A)/B2 was less than or equal to 25X, where X  is the mean density of
the wastes.  At a risk level of 10 percent, an acceptable value for
ta is  1.645.   Thus, equation 1 simplifies to:
                                                                (2)
     Equation 2 can now be used to determine the sample size required
to make an estimate of any generation variable if (a) an estimate of
the mean is made and (b) the desired sensitivity is stipulated.
                                  97

-------
     From the same Cincinnati  tests, the value of X was found to be
about 160 Ib per cu yd.  If we desire the density within 10 Ib per cu
yd, then:

                                68 (160)
                                 (10)2


                            n  = 108.8
     Therefore, 109 samples must be taken to determine the density of
the waste.

-------
                               APPENDIX C

                         SOLID WASTE SEPARATION
     Five separations of  residential solid waste were performed  in an
effort to determine the composition.  Samples of approximately 200 lb
were dumped onto a tarpaulin directly from a filled collection vehicle.
These samples were then hand-separated  into the following categories:

     Food waste—Waste resulting from food preparation, primarily
        putrescibles.

     Garden waste--Yard trimmings,  leaves, and brush (twigs and branches
        are included  in this category if they have diameters of  less
        than  1  in.).

     Paper products—Wrappi ng paper, newspaper, cardboard, and other
        similar i terns.

     Plastics,  rubber, leather — Pi astic film, packaging, and rubber and
        leather i terns.

     Text i1es— Natural and synthetic fabrics.

     Wood--Wood or wood products with diameters in excess of 1 in.

     Metals--Both ferrous and nonferrous metals (primarily cans,  with
        some wire,  metal   foil, and heavy, bulky items).

     Glass and cerami  cs--Host1y bottles and jars with some noncombus-
        tible ceramic materials.

     Ash, rocks, dirt--Noncombustible items that are too small to be
        separated into another category.

     The guiding principle behind the separation was to obtain groups of
materials having similar  physical and chemical  properties.  Appropriate
care was taken to place each item into the correct category, but  it
was not worthwhile to attempt to separate labels from cans or to make
other similarly minute divisions.  Such materials were placed in  the
category that most closely fit their major weight classification.

     After the waste  was  separated  into the nine components, each com-
ponent was weighed.   The  percentage composition on a weight basis was
then calculated for each  component  (Text Table 8).
                                  99

-------
                               APPENDIX D

                     MOISTURE-CONTENT DETERMINATION
     Solid waste moisture-content determinations were obtained for
separated waste on 4 different days.  Samples of food waste, garden
waste, paper products, and textiles were extracted from the separated
components.  Metals, glass and ceramics, and ash, rock, and dirt con-
tain negligible moisture and were therefore excluded.  Since a laboratory
grinder was not available, it was not possible to include plastics,
rubber, leather, and wood in the moisture sample.  Moisture calculations
were adjusted for the omission of these materials by using data obtained
in previous studies.  '

     The  laboratory procedure for determining moisture content was to
place the sample and  its container  in a drying oven at 70 C for approxi-
mately 24 hr.  The first sample was dried in the combined form, and
subsequent samples were dried by individual categories.

     Table D-l gives  the percentage moisture content for each sample.

     The moisture contents of the samples were then combined with the
weight of the contributing component, or components,  to calculate    ,
the moisture content of the residential solid waste as shown below.  '
2/26/69  M.C. = (0.294) (4.5 + 22.5 + 36.0 + 3-5) + 0.080 (6.0) +
                	0.070 (3.0) + 0-0 (152.0)	
                                     227.5

         M      19.6 + 0.5 + 0.2 = 20.3 = 0.089 = 8.9%
                    227.5         227.5

2/28/69  M.C. = 0.617  (17.0) + 0.165 (6.0) + 0.232 (31-5) + 0.329  (4.5) +
                	O.Q8Q  (1.5) + 0.070  (5-0)	
                                       180.5

         M r  -  2Q-7 = 0.115 = H.5%
         M'L- ~ 180.5

3/4/69   M.C. = 0.594  (36.0) + 0.567 (46.0) + 0.299  (45.0) + 0.090  (25-0) +
                                 0.080  (7-0) + 0.070  (3-5)
                  64.0 = 0.242 = 24.:
              ~  264.0
                                  100

-------

















•s
2
0
h- cn
< vO
•z. cn

Y*
fy* »,
LU LA
1 —
1 1 1 T"
Q -0
~y rv*
z 3 2:
— LU C3
1 h- 0
Q Z U- 1—
O O
LU U -
_j i >- cn
CO LU OH VD
<£ o^ o cn

t— —

— a: \o
O LU CM
LU *v
1— <
CO 3
< a:
3 cn
LU
Q U.

_J
O
CO






















0)
i_  a.'Zj'
co E 3
O cn 4-J
•Si Q)
CN° --3
.JZ en
Oi in
— O

0)
•M "a.
2 E
TO
>- cn

Q M-
O

0)
• i—
4-> a.
2 e
TO
4-J (/)
(U
^O





• 
4_J »— _£^
5 CL 
£ *~""
>~ TO -O
L— CO
o -a
»4- c
O (0


• 01
4-J •— f
2 Q. cn
E •-
4-J TO "O
0) 1/1
3 "O
M- C
O ro


0) 4-1
r~ *>
*™ _t_ .> f^^
a. cn E
E — 
TO tJ L- ~— '
CO TO
4-1

C
0)
0) 4-J
— U
a. a)
E "-
TO —
cn O
U
M-
O 0)
0> ro
Q.-O
^K
1-


on o -3" r^ LTV CM  r-~ LA -3" •— -3"








O 0 O O P» 0 LA
• • * • » * •
oo ~««r "^~ MS ^*« c^ vD
Q *~. „-. »— * oo
•^J" -^t" -^3" ™3P !***» t^\ f^






•— OsJ •"— CVJ 1^ CS| CO
• • * • • • •
r^ _ .3- —  VD "u "o a) 4-1
vO4->4->> 1 O 1- Q. X
1 0)(U COCO
• • • •
CO COCO CM
r-. CM


CM O -3" O
• • • •
o oo cnoo
LA • 	 CM






^^ \o r*^ oo
• • • •
co •— r-~ o
CM -3- CM CO








LA O CO •—
* » * •
V40 LA>sD LA
(^ r*** r*1^ oo
-3- co co co






C5 NJ3 vO cn
• • • •
o oo -3- r>-
oo cnoo oo
-3" CO CO CO





co o cn —
• • • •
vo P^ vO r*^
LA LA LA LA
CO CO CO CO







cn
0)
C —
0) U —
QT^ ^ ^ Q) 4-J
\o o i- a. x
1 O 0) TO 0)
-3- U. cj D_ h-
I
CO


oo r*^ VJD v^
oo co cn co
v£> co . — ro

LA ro co tN
• • • •
— co r^ —
O CM CO


cnvo en LA
• • • •
LA CA cn cn
-3" LA CM -3"






-3- en CM r^
• • • •
r^« co r^- CD
-3- oo coco








o o •— LA
* * * •
CM CM vO vO
O — OO O
-3" -3- CO -3-






LA CO -3" r~-
• • • •
ro o ro r-~
o -3- cn co
LA -3" CO -3"





• 	 3" CM O
• • • •
>*o vo vO r^«
LA LA LA LA
CO CO CO CO







in
a)
c •—
a) L. .-
cn "o "D QJ 4->
vO O L. Q- X
1 O TO TO 
LA LL. C3 Q- I—
1
CO
101

-------
3/5/69   M.C. = 0.688 (20.5) + 0.337 (22.0) + 0.196 (29.5) + 0.386
                                 Q.080 (2.5) + 0.070  (7.0)
                  33.6 = 0.169 = 16.
                 T9B75
Average moisture content = 0.15^ =
                               REFERENCES
a.   Kaiser, E. R.  Chemical analyses of refuse components.  j_n_ Proceed-
        ings;  1966 National Incinerator Conference.  New York,  American
        Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1966.  p. 8^-88.

b.   Fryling, G. F.  Combustion Engineering.  New York, Combustion
        Engineering, Inc.,  1966.   [883 p.]
                                  102

-------
                               APPENDIX E

          EFFECT OF RAINFALL ON MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOLID WASTE
     Solid waste stored in open containers (the common practice on
Guam) will absorb water in relation to the amount of rain that falls
on it up to the moisture-holding capacity of the waste.   (Most of the
containers on Guam have perforated bottoms and will not therefore
retain more water than the holding capacity of the waste.)  Previous
studies  have shown that this moisture-holding capacity is about 213
percent on a dry basis or 68 percent on a wet basis.

     Residential waste on Guam had a density of 4.9 lb per cu ft with a
moisture content of 15*4 percent (wet-weight).  The corresponding dry
density would be 4.1 lb per cu ft.

     If we assume that a typical container has a diameter of "D" feet,
its base area will be rrD^/4.  Rainfall will enter the container in the
total volume of TrD^R/48 cu ft, where R is the amount of rain in inches.
The weight of the rain will be 62.4 -rrD2R/48 lb.

     The moisture content of the waste on a dry basis would then be:


u . .          ^ to.  ,  \    pounds of rain + pounds of natural moisture   ._.„
Moisture content (% dry)  = r	^-j	r—,	 x 100
                      '                   pounds of dry waste

     The average volume of waste in each container surveyed on Guam was
found to be 4.0 cu ft, which is equivalent to a dry weight of waste of
16.4 lb per container.

     An analysis of separation data for Guam and reported moisture con-
tent of components under laboratory conditions '  indicates that the
lowest expected moisture content would be 11.5 percent on a wet basis,
or 130 percent on a dry basis.  Natural moisture, at 13.0 percent of
dry weight, would be 2.2 lb per container.

     The 55-gal drums encountered on Guam had an average diameter of
1.85 ft.  The weight of rain entering these containers would then be
equal to 14.0 R lb, where R is the amount of rain in inches.
                                  103

-------
     Expressed as a function of rainfall, the dry weight moisture con-
tent of the residential waste on Guam would be:


          Moisture content (%) =     ,/ I 2'2    x 100
                                     I b. H

                               = 85.4 R + 13

     The average monthly rainfall  for Guam is shown on Table E-l.

     Using the developed equation, the relationship between rainfall and
the moisture content of the waste (Figure E-l) was calculated by assuming
that one-quarter of the monthly rainfall  would fall during the 7 days be-
tween collections.

     The total weight of the waste is the sum of dry weight and the
weight of the moisture in it.  As the moisture content increases, the
unit weight of the waste will also increase according to the following
relat ionsh i p:

Unit weight (wet basis) = dry weight + weight of water

                        = dry weight + (dry weight) x (fraction of water)

                        = (dry weight)  x (1 + fraction of water)

     The dry unit weight of waste on Guam was found to be 4.1 1b per cu
ft.  Substituting this figure into the above equation the following  is
obtained:

     Unit weight (wet basis)  = 4.1 (l + fraction of water)

     This relationship was then used to calculate the unit weight of
waste for the expected moisture contents.

     For the average moisture content of 140 percent, the unit weight
of residential solid waste is about 9-8 Ib per cu ft.

     Although an analysis of this type is not as good an engineering
practice as more frequent sampling of the waste, it is felt that this
will yield conservative results that can be used in a report of this
type to estimate the magnitude of the solid waste problem on Guam.
Additional sampling during both wet and dry seasons should be con-
ducted before detailed plans for solid waste management are designed
and implemented.
                                  104

-------
                               TABLE E-l

      AVERAGE RAINFALL AT AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION,  GUAM,  1952-62
                               (Inches)
Month
January
February
March
Apri 1
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Average monthly
rainfal 1 *
3.85
2.73
1.90
2.87
3.68
4.48
9.10
12.68
14.71
13.06
10.18
5.46
Assumed average
weekly rai nf al 1
0.96
0.68
0.47
0.71
0.92
1.12
2.27
3-17
3-67
3.26
2.54
1.36
     -Data from Ward,  P.E.,  S.H.  Hoffard,  and  D.A.  Davis.   Hydrology  of
Guam.   Geological  Survey Professional  Paper  403-H.   Washington,  U.S.
Government Printing Office,  19^5.   28  p.
                                 105

-------
 240-
- 14.0
                                                                - 13.0
               1.0          2.0          3.0         4.0
                   ASSUMED WEEKLY RAINFALL (INCHES)
5.0
       Figure E-l.   Relation between rainfall, moisture con-
                    tent,  and unit weight of solid waste.
                               REFERENCES
a. Solid wastes landfill stabilization;  second  annual  report.   Los
     Angeles, Ralph Stone and Co.,  Inc.,  1969.  mimeo.   1^7  p.

b. Kaiser, E. R.  Chemical analyses of  refuse components.   In  Proceedings;
     1966 National  Incinerator Conference,  New  York, May 1-57" 1966.
     American Society of Mechanical Engineers,  p.  84-88.

c. Fryling, G.  F.   Combustion engineering.   New York,  Combustion Engi-
     neering, Inc., 1966.  [883 p.3
                                  106

-------
                               APPENDIX F

               COLLECTION TIMES AND TIME-STUDY PROCEDURE


     Seven of the solid waste collection trucks were followed during
the study to tabulate the number of miles traveled, services and  items
collected, and the amount of time necessary for collection  (Figure  F-1).

     Rather than collecting information on a total trip basis, data
were recorded for short distance intervals, either a block  or a similar
distance.  This practice resulted in a number of data points that were
applicable to evaluation by multiple regression.

     The last four columns in Figure F-1 were used for work sampling
of the collection process.  Fifty randomly spaced observations were
made of each of the three crew members over a 2i hr period.  At the
time of observation it was recorded if the crew member was walking,
carrying, loading, riding, waiting, or doing some other operation.
The total number of observations of walking, carrying, loading, and
riding was divided by the total number of observations (150) to ob-
tain the fraction of productive time for a particular crew.  Similarly,
the fraction of "waiting" time and of "other" time was also calculated.

     The elapsed time for each data point recorded in the field was
then multiplied by the productive fraction to obtain the productive
time.  This operation was carried out to reduce the variation between
crews so that the data from similar vehicles could be combined for
analysis.

     Multiple regressions were run of distance, number of services, and
number of items against productive time.  The distance from the truck
to the items for collection was not included because of the lack of
variation in the data.  These regressions were first run for each
individual truck;  the data for packer trucks and for dump trucks were
then combined into two groups.  The resulting equations for these two
types of vehicles are:

Packer:  Productive time = 2.84 x (miles) + 0.09 x (No. of  services) + 0.21

                           x (No. of items) + 0.38

Dump:  Productive time   = 8.63 x (miles) - 1.29 x (No. of  services) + 1.40

                           x (No. of items) + 0.99
                                  107

-------

No.






















































;ity
Residential Collection Data Sheet
Date
^oute Weather
Vehicle No Data hy
Tvoe
Capncity r.y
Location






















































Distance
(feet)






















































Elapsed
Time






















































Number of
Services






















































Number of
Items






















































S = wa
C - co
L = IOC
R = ric
W= we
0 = ot
Avg Distance
to items(Ft)






















































Iking
Page 	 A of 	
for "/,.


ina fnr o/*

her fnr o/.
Time
(0= )





Man One






































































































Man Two























































Man Three






















































Figure F-l.   Field survey collection-time data sheet.
                          108

-------
     The equation for packer trucks explained 88 percent of the
variation in the data with a standard deviation of 23 percent of
the response mean.  Eighty-six percent of the variation was explained
for dump trucks with a standard deviation of 24 percent of the
response mean.

     Although the "waiting" time was removed for the purpose of analy-
sis, it is a function of the equipment used and the skill of the crew
and will always be present to some degree.  It must therefore be con-
sidered when calculating the total collection time.

     Similarly, the "other" time will always be present because a crew
cannot be expected to work 8 hr without breaks or rest periods.  The
"waiting" and "other" times were added to the calculated productive
time to get the collection time--1.64 times the productive time for
packers and 1.45 times the productive time for dump trucks.
                                  log

-------
                               APPENDIX G

                             EQUIPMENT NEEDS


     Assume that twice weekly collection of waste will be provided
for residences, businesses, industries, and labor camps, and daily
collection for schools, hospitals, and government offices.  There
are 12,693 residential dwelling units that must be collected twice
weekly, thus making a total of 25,386 services.  The daily collection
(5 days per week) would include 5,080 residences.  With an average
of 1.82 items per service, this would be 9>240 items per day.

     There are 5^7 commercial  establishments,  13 hotels, 32 parks,  15
industries, 27 clinics, 16 alien labor camps,  and 58 churches that
must be collected twice weekly for a total of 1,416 services or 280
units per day.  With three items per service,  this is 840 items per
day.

     There are 40 government offices on the island, 65 schools, and one
hospital.  Assume that there are 10 items at each of these services;
the result is 106 services and 1,060 items per day.

     This is a total of 5,466 services and 11,]40 items per day.   If
there are 60 services per mile, daily collection will cover about 90
miles.  By making use of the equation for packer trucks presented  in
Appendix F, the following results:

Productive time = 2.84 (miles) + 0.09 (No. of services) +

                  0.21 (No. of items) + 0.38

                = 2.84 (90) + 0.09  (5,466) + 0.21 (11,140) + 0,38

                = 256 + 492 + 2,339

                = 3,087 min

The total daily collection time is  therefore:

     Collection time = 1.64 (productive time)

     Collection time = 1.64 (3,08?) = 5,063 min = 84 hr
                                    10

-------
     We must further assume that, of the 8-hr collection day, 2 hr
are spent traveling to and from the route and disposal site and at
the disposal site.  This leaves 6 hr for collection.  The number of
necessary packer trucks is then:

Number of trucks = total collection time v collection time per truck

                 = 84 v 6 = 14 trucks

     It has been shown that a change to 32-gal containers and the
elimination of 55~gal drums would result in a time savings of 22 per-
cent.  If this savings is applied to the time associated with the number
of items (2,339). the productive time would then be:

     Productive time  = 256 + 492 + 0.?8 (2,339)

                      =748+1,824 = 2,572 min

     Collection time  = 1.64 (2,572)

                      = 4,218 min = 70 hr

     Number of trucks = 70 * 6 = 12 trucks

     Further time savings could be achieved by the use of disposable
bags (either plastic or paper)  and bulk containers at sources with
large numbers of cans.  Other factors should be examined, however,
before adoption of these systems.  These include the use of special
collection equipment, cleaning of containers for the bulk container
system, the cost of bags, racks, and animal-attraction problems
associated with bag storage of solid waste.
                                  11

-------
                               APPENDIX H

                          PRESENT LEGISLATION*

                              SUBCHAPTER Q

                           Garbage and Rubbish
        §9660     Definitions.
        §9660.1   Prohibition.
        §9660.2   Garbage on Premises.
        §9660.3   Rubbish on Premises.
        §9660.4   Edible Garbage.
        §9660.5   Removal of Construction Debris.
        §9660.6   Disposition.
        §9660.7   Burning Garbage.
        §9660.8   Department of Public Works to Collect.
        §9660.9   Transportation.
        §9660.10  Vehicles Not to be Used for Food Transportation.
        §9660.11  Regulations.
        §9660.12  Director to Supervise Sanitation of Dumps.
        §9660.13  Acquisition of Property for Dump Purposes.
        §9660.14  Operation of Dumps.
        §9660.15  Contract.
        §9660.16  Persons Prohibited from Dumps.
     §9660.  Definitions.  The following definitions shall apply in
the interpretation and enforcement of this chapter:

     (a)  "Garbage" means any offal, swill, leavings of food aban-
          doned, spoiled, condemned, or decayed meat, fish, animal,
          or vegetable matter, including offal  from the slaughter-
          ing of animals.

     (b)  "Rubbish" means any waste, refuse, broken or rejected
          matter, trash, junk, debris, not including garbage, whether
          combustible or noncombustible.

     (Added by P.L. 109 3 3rd G.L.3 approved August 133 l9563 to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day foil-owing its approval.)
     "Reprinted from the Government Code of Guam.
                                  112

-------
     §9660.1.  Prohibition.  No person shall have on his premises any
garbage or rubbish except as herein provided.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L. 3 approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.2.  Garbage on Premises.  Garbage shall be stored in durable,
metal receptacles which shall have close-fitting covers.  Such recep-
tacles shall be kept covered except while being filled or emptied.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August IS, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.3.  Rubbish on Premises.  Rubbish shall be stored in durable
receptacles with close-fitting covers, except that bulky rubbish such
as branches, weeds, or boxes may be bundled.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L.3 approved August IS, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.4.  Edible Garbage.  The Director is authorized to prescribe
by regulation such processing and limitations with respect to the use
of garbage as animal feed or other use as he may deem necessary for the
public health.  No garbage shall be sold or disposed of as food for
human consumption.

     (Added by P.L.  109, 3rd G.L., approved August IS, 1956,  to be
effective at 12:01 A.M.  on the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.5.  Removal of Construction Debris.   Removal of rubbish,
debris, and earth incident to construction or excavation work, or
grading of land, shall be the responsibility of the owner of the build-
ing or land.

     (Added by P.L.  109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956,  to be
effective at 12:01 A.M.  on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.6.  Disposition.  No person shall dispose of any garbage,
rubbish, or other offensive substances, including dead animals and
offal, into any river, creek, pond, reservoir, stream, well, or spring,
                                   13

-------
or any collection of fresh water, into or upon any public or private
driveway, alley, street, highway or road, beach, or any public place,
or any public property except in an authorized public dump or recep-
tacle furnished for such purpose, or other place as may be authorized
by the Director, or on any other private property except with the
consent of the owner and in conformity with law.

     (Added by P.L.  1093 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.7.  Burning Garbage.   No person shall destroy or attempt to
destroy by burning,  except in an  incinerator the construction and opera-
tion of which is approved by the Director, or as may otherwise be
authorized by the Director, any garbage, dead animals, or other offen-
sive substances the burning of which may give off foul and noisome
odors, in, or within one fourth (?) mile, of Agana, any village, or
any other urban area.

     (Added by P.L.  109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, l9563 to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.8.  Department of Public Works to Collect.  The Department
of Public Works shall collect and dispose of garbage and rubbish,
except where the Governor, by executive order, places this respon-
sibility upon a Commissioner.  Such collection and disposal service
shall be furnished in Agana and all villages and urban area, and may
be extended to further areas by administrative action.  No fee or
assessment shall be  levied or charged for the collection and disposal
of such garbage and  rubbish from premises or portion of premises
used exclusively for residential purposes.  As to all other premises,
fees shall be charged.  The Director of Public Works shall establish
a schedule of reasonable fees and a procedure for payment thereof by
regu1 at ion.

     (Added by P.L.  109, Srd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.9.  Transportation.  No person shall transport any garbage
or rubbish  in any vehicle  in any street or highway unless adequate
precautions are taken to prevent such garbage or rubbish from falling
from or being dislodged from such vehicle during such transportation.
If any such garbage or rubbish falls from or is dislodged from any

-------
such vehicle upon any street, highway, or any other public or private
property, it shall be the obligation of the operator of such vehicle
immediately to pick up and remove such garbage or rubbish.

     (Added by P.L.  109, 3rd G.L., approved August IS, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M.  on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.10.  Vehicles Not to be Used for Food Transportation.  Ve-
hicles used for conveying garbage or rubbish shall not be used for
the transportation or conveyance of any food or drink, including any
meat, fish, vegetables, or other food stuff which are to be used for
human consumption.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.11.  Regulations.  The Director of Public Works may by
regulation prescribe additional requirements with regard to garbage
and rubbish receptacles and collection of garbage and rubbish.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on~ the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.12.  Director to Supervise Sanitation of Dumps.  The Director
shall have cognizance for health and sanitation purposes of all public
and private dumps or sites used for the dumping, incineration, or other
disposition of garbage, rubbish, and other offensive substances.  He
may in his discretion order that any such dump or site be closed, aban-
doned, filled in, or otherwise terminated, in whole or in part, or
limited in its operations, in the interests of the public health.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)


     §9660.13.  Acquisition of Property for Dump Purposes.  In accord-
ance with provisions of law such public land may be set aside or
acquired as may be needed as public dumps or sites for the dumping,
incineration or other disposition of garbage, rubbish and other offen-
sive substances.  No such land shall be set aside or acquired for
such purpose without the prior approval  of the Director.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
                                   15

-------
     §9660.14.  Operation of Dumps.  Public dumps shall be estab-
lished, operated and maintained by the Department of Public Works,
except where the Governor, by executive order, places this responsi-
bility upon a Commissioner.

     (Added by P.L. 1093 3rd G.L., approved August 13,  1956,  to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.15.  Contract.  The Department of Public Works, with the
approval of the Governor, may execute a contract after public bid
with a private person for the collection and disposal of any garbage,
rubbish, or other offensive substances, or separate  items thereof.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M.  on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
     §9660.16.  Persons Prohibited from Dumps.  No person shall be
permitted on any public dump except persons having material to clump
and other authorized persons.

     (Added by P.L. 109, 3rd G.L., approved August 13, 1956, to be
effective at 12:01 A.M. on the sixtieth day following its approval.)
                                   116

-------