REPORT TO CONGRESS
           DAM WATER QUALITY STUDY
                 Prepared by:

    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               Office of Water
  Office of Water Regulations  and Standards
Assessment  and  Watershed Protection Division
              401 M  Street, S.W.
          Washington,  D.C.   20460

                  March 1989
                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Flow
                 Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
     EPA acknowledges the following organizations which provided input in
the preparation of this report:

American Rivers
Bonneville Power Administration
Department of Water Resources - State of California
Electric Power Research Institute
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Missouri Department of Conservation
National Wildlife Federation
New Mexico Health and Environment Department
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Salt River Project
Tennessee Division of Water
Tennessee Valley Authority
U.S. Army - Corps of Engineers
U.S. Army - Engineers Waterways Experiment Station
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
U.S. Department of Interior
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Offices
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Soil Conservation Service - USDA
Utilities Water Act Group - Hunton & Williams
Western States Water Council
     EPA  especially  appreciates  the   efforts   of   U.S.   Bureau  of
Reclamation, Tennessee  Valley Authority,  U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers,
Soil Conservation Service, Utilities Water Act Group, Oak  Ridge National
Laboratory,  and  Electric  Power  Research  Institute, who provided very
comprehensive and useful comments on the report.

     Contract support was provided by  GKY  and  Associates,  Inc., under
subcontract with  Versar, Inc. through Contract No. 68-03-3339 with EPA's
Monitoring and Data Support Division.

-------
                            EXECUTIVE SUfflARY
     The objective  of this  report is  to identify water quality effects
attributable to the impoundment of water by dams  as required  by Section
524 of  the Water Quality Act of 1987.  This document presents a study of
water quality effects associated with impoundments in the U.S.A.

     This Executive Summary  provides  the  general  observations  of the
report followed  by summaries  of each  of the six major report elements.
First, a generic description of water  quality effects  of dams  based on
existing knowledge is presented.  Four types of analyses are then used to
attempt to define the occurrence and  magnitude of  water quality effects
within and downstream of impoundments:  a mixing analysis; an analysis of
dissolved oxygen concentrations in power dam tailwaters; a  comparison of
upstream   versus   downstream   concentrations   of  selected  indicator
parameters; and an investigation of phosphorous enrichment.  Case studies
are  presented  to  illustrate  some  of  the  water  quality effects and
mitigation measures.   Next, a generic  discussion of  mitigation measures
for  addressing   some  of   the  water  quality  effects  is  presented.
Assessments of water quality conditions at U.S. Army  Corps of Engineers,
Tennessee  Valley   Authority,  and   the  U.S.   Bureau  of  Reclamation
impoundments are provided as  a supplement  to these  analyses.  Finally,
conclusions on impoundment effects on water quality are presented.

     There are  a large number of dams throughout the United States.  The
Soil  Conservation  Service  estimates  there  are  over  2,000,000  dams
including  farm  ponds  and  recreational  impoundments.    The  Corps of
Engineers (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1982b) inventoried 68,155 larger
dams meeting  minimum size  criteria.  These 68,155 dams are the basis of
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) analyses  in this  study.  They
can  be  divided  into  three  categories:  large power dams (424), large
nonpower dams (1,701), and  small dams  (66,030).   The large  power dams
contain 62  percent of the total volume of water normally stored by dams;
large nonpower and small dams contain  33  and  5  percent  of  the total
volume,  respectively.    Dams  have  a variety of purposes which include
hydropower  generation   (including  pump   storage),  navigation,  flood
control,  water  supply,  conservation,  recreation,  fish  and  wildlife
maintenance, and low flow augmentation.

     This study is limited in estimating the national extent of dam water
quality primarily  because of  a lack of monitoring and descriptive data.
The STOrage and RETrieval data base  (STORET)  was  used  as  the primary
source  of  monitoring  data.    Although  quite extensive, data were not
available for many of the sites  randomly selected  for analysis.   Other
descriptive data,  such as  the type  of outlet structure, watershed land

                                  ii

-------
use, and other influences on water quality, were  also  not  available  for
this study.  Additional monitoring data, descriptive data,  and  a larger
random sample of dams would probably extend the study's  findings.   This
study is also limited in that it identifies water quality effects from the
impoundment of  waters  by  dams,  but  does  not  address  the effects  on
biological  habitat or wetlands, which  may be substantial.
WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUHDMENTS

      Impoundment of  free-flowing water  by dams may  potentially  create
several  effects,  both positive and  negative,  on water quality within the
pool  and downstream.  Although this  report focuses  on unwanted effects,
desirable changes,  such  as  a reduced  sediment load, may also result.  The
potential effects are often interdependent.  Altering one condition in an
impoundment may  create  a  ripple  of effects  throughout the  reservoir-
stream ecosystem.

      Impoundments  can  modify the  physical,  chemical,  and  biological
characteristics  of  the  free-flowing  aquatic  ecosystem.   Physical  and
chemical  characteristics  in  impoundments  are  also  related  to  depth,
volume,   climate,  watershed  land  use,  geographic  location,  reservoir
siting,  and the schedule of water releases.   Biological  characteristics
are related to the type of habitat.  The magnitude  of effect  of the dam
on water quality  of  releases appears  related to the type of reservoir and
to the design and operation of the  impoundment.

      Effects  can  be divided  into   three  categories:   stratification-
related effects,  eutrophication, and other changes.   Stratification,  a
naturally occurring  condition,  results when warmer waters overlie cooler,
denser waters.   Deeper  impoundments  with  poor mixing  tend to stratify.
Stratification water quality effects  may  include:

            low dissolved  oxygen  in  the hypolimnion  (bottom waters);

            increased dissolved iron  and  manganese concentrations;

            hydrogen sulfide production;
            production of  nitrous gas;  and

            changes  in water temperature.

      Eutrophication  is  a naturally  occurring  process  whece  excess
nutrients (especially nitrogen and  phosphorus)  from watersheds flow into
an impoundment.   These  excess nutrients  cause increased  and sometimes
undesirable growth of algae and rooted plants.  This situation, coupled
with stratification, may result in the depletion  of dissolved oxygen in
the bottom  layer of  the  impoundment and the  release of  soluble iron,
soluble manganese,  and hydrogen sulfide.
                                    n

-------
     When there  are stratification-related  effects, possibly compounded
with eutrophication, impoundments with outlets accepting withdrawals from
lower impoundment  depths transmit  the water quality of the pool's lower
levels into the tail waters.   Large  power dams  are more  likely to have
low-level outlets  than are small and large nonpower dams because project
purposes influence the type of outlet.

     Other water quality effects of dams  are generally  considered to be
less predominant  than eutrophication and stratification-related effects.
Other effects include gaseous supersaturation, salinity changes, sediment
deposition,  sediment  movement,  flow regulation, reaeration denial (the
restriction  of  natural  reaeration  processes),  fish  entrainment (the
capture  and  passage  of  fish  through  turbine  machinery), and toxics
accumulation.  Downstream transport  of toxic-bearing  sediments from the
pool area  may occur if sediments are disturbed by dredging, dam removal,
or dam failure.

RESULTS OF EPA ANALYSES

     Information on small and large nonpower impoundments is limited, and
no quantitative  conclusions are  reached through the analyses of effects
of these two  categories  of  dams,  with  the  exception  of  the mixing
analysis for  large nonpower  impoundments.  Data obtained for this study
on these two categories  are presented  in the  appendices.   Quantitative
findings,   limited   to   a   few  broad  conclusions  for  large  power
impoundments, are presented below:

          The  mixing  analysis  using  Froude  numbers   indicates  that
          stratification  conditions  ("poor  mixing")  are  estimated to
          occur in 40 percent of  the  large  power  impoundments  and 37
          percent in the large nonpower impoundments.  The Froude number,
          which considers only the kinetic and  potential energy provided
          to the  flowing waters  by gravity,  is a  limited predictor of
          stratification.  The influence  of low-level  releases on these
          results is unknown.

          Dissolved oxygen  levels in  tail waters in  the dams of the Oak
          Ridge National Laboratory study  (Cada, et  al., 1983)  and the
          dams in  this study  are similar.  The data are not intended to
          quantify the dissolved oxygen findings on a national basis, but
          certain relationships are observed in the sample:

               Dissolved oxygen in power dam tailwaters during the summer
               has a much greater probability of not meeting  a criterion
               of 5 mg/1 than during winter.

               Larger    power-generating    facilities    show   greater
               probability of not meeting  a  dissolved  oxygen criterion
               than do smaller power-generating facilities.
                                IV

-------
          Dissolved oxygen in downstream water  showed  a decrease in 22 to
          50 percent of the  waters below  large  power  dams,  based  on a
          comparison of  upstream and  downstream dissolved oxygen levels
          of 40 large power dams.    Similarly,  15  percent to   42 percent
          showed an  increase in dissolved  oxygen,  while 35 percent to 62
          percent showed no change.

          Large power impoundments are  likely  to  experience  phosphorous
          enrichment,  an  indicator  of  potential   eutrophication.   The
          sample for large power impoundments showed such potential in 58
          percent  to  78  percent  of  the sample.   However,  phosphorus
          enrichment is  only one  of several   factors, including climate
          and   the   presence   of   other  nutrients,   resulting   in
          eutrophication.
CASE STUDIES

     Case studies provide a detailed examination  of several   of the water
quality effects  and mitigation  measures presented  in this report.   The
fifteen case studies are  not representative  of  all   impoundments in the
nation.   They do,  however,  represent  impoundments  specifically studied
because they exhibit, or  are thought  to exhibit,   certain  water quality
effects.    In  order  to  maintain perspective in  the discussion of case
studies, one  of  the  case  studies  included  is   reported  to  have no
undesirable  effects.    The  case  studies describe,  in most situations,
efforts undertaken  by operating  Agencies to  mitigate undesirable water
quality conditions  within the operating and legal  constraints imposed at
the time the dams are authorized  and  constructed.    The  fourteen case
studies showing  adverse water quality effects exhibit one or more of the
following:    low  hypolimnetic  dissolved  oxygen,  increased  iron  and
manganese,  eutrophication,  hydrogen  sulfide,  sediment  movement,  flow
regulation, thermal  changes,  and reaeration  denial.     All   of  the case
studies  that  exhibit  increased  iron  and  manganese,  eutrophication,
thermal change, and   hydrogen  sulfide  have  low  hypolimnetic dissolved
oxygen.   Mitigation measures  used to  improve water quality in the pool
are  typically  reaeration  or  destratification   by  pumping  and/or air
injection.  Mitigation of water quality downstream  of the impoundments is
typically selective  withdrawals and turbine aeration.
MITIGATION MEASURES

     This report identifies major mitigation measures (mainly oriented to
addressing tailwater  improvements below power dams) that can address the
adverse  water  quality  effects  associated  with  certain impoundments.
Because each  impoundment system is unique, the applicability of specific
mitigation measures must be evaluated  on  a  case-by-case  basis.   This
evaluation must consider the adverse effects that require correction, the
present impoundment purposes, the measure cost, and the undesirable side

-------
effects  of  the  measure  itself.   Oftentimes, multiple measures may be
necessary.    Mitigation  measures  can  be  divided  into   three  broad
categories:    physical  measures,  operational  measures, and structural
modification.

     Physical  measures   include  technologies   that  require  specific
processes  or  equipment  to  be  used  to correct the problem.  Physical
mitigation  measures  include  the  control  of  water  quality   in  the
reservoir, selective  withdrawal of reservoir water with acceptable water
quality, aeration of reservoir releases, and habitat modification.

     Operational measures include changes to the present operating regime
of  the  reservoir  modification.    These  include maintaining a minimum
discharge, limiting the maximum discharge, and  altering the  rule curves
for reservoir operations.

     Structural modifications involve changes to the structure of the dam
and/or its outlet works;  examples  are  the  addition  of  ports, gates,
vents, or weirs to modify the depth or manner in which water is withdrawn
from the reservoir.

     Mitigation measures can be applied to  the pool,  tailwaters, and/or
to  the  sources  of  runoff  to  the impoundment.  Three pool mitigative
measures are induced mixing, aeration of the bottom layer of a stratified
impoundment,  and  dredging  applied  directly  to  the impoundment pool.
Induced mixing usually is  the  pumping  of  surface  waters  downward or
pumping of bottom waters upward, and is intended to reduce stratification
effects.  Aeration through  injection of  air or  oxygen raises dissolved
oxygen  concentrations,  and  may  induce mixing.  Dredging, the physical
removal  of  sediment  deposits,  may  lengthen  the  useful  life  of an
impoundment, but  may result in short-term water quality problems through
the resuspension of nutrients and contaminants.

     Three mitigative measures  applied  to  tailwaters  are  aeration of
reservoir  releases,   selective  withdrawal   of  reservoir  water,  and
improvement of tailwater habitat.  Aeration of reservoir  releases may be
achieved by  turbine venting,  air injection, and/or cascaded tailwaters.
Selective withdrawal  is the  ability to  choose a  withdrawal depth with
appropriate   dissolved   oxygen   levels   and  temperatures.    Habitat
improvement provides minimum flows  and D.O.  levels required  to support
target fish populations in downstream pools.

     Other mitigative  measures involve  watershed management and changes
in dam operations.  Watershed management addresses reducing  the nutrient
and contaminant  sources (nonpoint  source pollution) in the watershed of
an impoundment.  One change in  dam operations  is to  maintain a minimum
constant discharge  where zero discharge periodically occurs.  This helps
maintain a minimum flow to avoid  rapid temperature  fluctuations, reduce
the  impact  of  low  dissolved  oxygen  concentrations  through  natural
aeration (unless the minimum release  itself  has  a  very  low dissolved
oxygen concentration),  and increase habitats for fish and benthic biota.
A second  change in  dam operation  is to  limit discharges  to a certain

                                 vi

-------
maximum flow, reducing impacts on dissolved oxygen during periods of low
concentrations  in  the  discharges  through  natural   aeration  in  the
tailwaters.
FEDERAL AGENCY ASSESSMENTS

      The  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers  (COE),   the  Tennessee  Valley
Authority  (TVA),  and  the  U.S.   Bureau  of  Reclamation  (USBR)  provided
supplementary information to this report on  water  quality conditions at
their dams.   These  three agencies  requested  that  they be  allowed to
contribute specific  assessments  of  the dams they  manage.  None  of the
other commenters  offered  similar assessments.   Information  provided by
each Agency includes:

            Statement  of  policies   and  procedures  followed  by  these
            Agencies in the development and management of water resources.

            Assessment of water quality with respect to  the Agency's dams.


      Dams managed  by these three Agencies  represent  a  broad  range of
geography, climate, and operational   situations.  COE dams are typically
multipurpose, and  may  include flood control, navigation, hydropower, water
supply,  water quality, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement.  The
COE dams are  concentrated along mainstem navigable rivers, coastal areas,
industrialized areas  of the Southeast and  the Ohio River Basin,  and the
Pacific Northwest.   These  dams  contain approximately  34  percent of the
total volume of water normally stored by  all 68,155 dams.  TVA operates
reservoirs in the Tennessee Valley primarily for purposes of navigation,
flood control, and electrical generation.  The  TVA reservoirs represent
mature reservoirs  in a well developed  and somewhat industrialized extended
river basin.   Normal  storage volume  at TVA reservoirs is approximately 2
percent of the total volume.  USBR reservoirs  are primarily in the western
states,   typically  in  arid  areas.    The  USBR   projects  are  often
multipurpose, and  include:  water supply,  hydropower,  irrigation, water
quality,  flood  control,  river  regulation,  recreation,  and fish  and
wildlife enhancement.   USBR reservoirs, at normal  pool volumes,  account
for  approximately 22  percent  of the  total  volume.   The  remaining 42
percent of normal pool volume is impounded  behind dams  owned  by other
governmental  entities or privately.

      Information  for the  Agencies'  assessments was obtained through a
questionnaire  designed  to  collect  information   on   project  design,
operation, and water  quality status.   The questionnaires were completed
by agency  personnel  familiar  with each dam.  Subjective responses were
requested  in regard  to  water  quality  problems   of  pool  waters  and
tailwaters.   Where problems were indicated,  the impact  of each problem
upon user benefits is  estimated and a rating assigned.  User benefits  vary
by individual project.  Analysis  of  the results is limited to frequency
of occurrence of  specific water quality conditions and their impact  upon
user benefits.

                                   vii

-------
     Water  quality  problems  at  the  Agencies'   impoundments  vary  in
frequency and in degree of impact.  Overall, physical conditions, such as
fluctuating pool  and tailwater  levels and high and low flows, appear to
be the primary conditions affecting user benefits.  Data are  lacking for
many chemical  water quality  parameters.   For the  TVA system, chemical
concerns are usually more serious than physical concerns, even though the
latter  are  not  prevalent.    Eutrophication  and related water quality
conditions (e.g., algae, high nutrient levels, and low  dissolved oxygen)
are noted in many reservoirs.

     The   COE   survey   evaluates   46   of   their  700  impoundments.
Approximately half of the 46 projects have water quality data.  Tailwater
problems are  identified in  35 to  40 percent  of the samples with data.
Flow fluctuation and high and low flows are the key problems.   Pool water
problems in  40 to  50 percent of the samples with data are identified as
eutrophication  and  related  problems  (high  nutrients,  low  dissolved
oxygen, algal blooms, and macrophytes).

     The TVA  survey evaluates  all 33 of their large impoundments.  Data
were available for dissolved oxygen, temperature,  flow, pool  levels, and
macrophytes  at  all  projects.    Data  for  the  other  parameters were
available for an average of  60  percent  of  the  projects.   Tailwaters
experienced problems  with low  dissolved oxygen,  flow fluctuations, high
and  low  flows,  and  low  temperature  at  40  percent  of  their dams.
Significant pool  water problems include level fluctuations at 50 percent
of  the  projects,  bacteria  at  30   percent,  and   turbidity,  algae,
macrophytes, and sediment at 15 to 20 percent.

     The USBR  survey evaluates 250 of their 349 impoundments (41 percent
of the tail waters and  46 percent  of the  pool water  sampled have water
quality data).  High flow is the primary problem in tailwaters, affecting
21 percent of those with data.  Drawdown and pool   level fluctuations are
identified as  the main  impact-producing conditions  in reservoir pools,
occurring at 36 percent and 35 percent, respectively.

     Because  of  the  lack  of  data  on  the  majority  of   dams,  the
questionnaire results  do not present a complete picture of water quality
for each Agency's impoundments.  Also, it is  likely that  existing water
quality  data  were  only  collected  at projects with known or suspected
problems;  the  resulting  picture  may,  therefore,   be  skewed  toward
conditions at which problems are perceived.  The data are insufficient to
support specific conclusions applicable to all dams; however,  preliminary
evaluations indicate  that although project operation plays a significant
role in  determining  water  quality  of  reservoir  releases,  there are
pronounced regional  patterns of water quality conditions associated with
dams.  Regional  attributes,  such as  geology and  climate, together with
watershed processes  and land  use, play  a major role in reservoir water
quality.  The Agencies feel the  limited analysis  presented herein gives
an accurate picture of the known extent of given water quality conditions
                                 vm

-------
across  a  broad  range  of  geography,  climate,   and  project operating
criteria, along with an assessment  of  the  perceived  impacts  of these
conditions on user benefits.
CONCLUSIONS

     The overall   conclusions for this study are based on both the agency
assessments and the EPA analytical results.   Impoundment  of free-flowing
water by  dams may  potentially create  several  effects on water quality.
Effects can be divided  into  three  categories:   stratification-related
effects,   eutrophication,   and   other   changes,   such   as   gaseous
supersaturation.   Dam outlets at low levels  transmit the water quality of
the pool's  lower levels into the tailwaters.   Poorly mixed or stratified
impoundments with low-level outlets (inhibiting reaeration) are likely to
exhibit low  levels of  dissolved oxygen  and increased levels of reduced
iron and manganese concentrations in the  tailwaters.   Furthermore, dams
that create impoundments with long detention times have the potential for
nutrient  enrichment  when  the  upstream  runoff   includes  significant
nutrients  from  point  or  nonpoint  sources.   Nutrient-rich impoundment
waters are an indicator of potential excessive  eutrophication.

     The results of  the  four  EPA  analyses  conducted  for  this study
(mixing,  tailwater  dissolved  oxygen, upstream/downstream comparison of
parameters, and phosphorous enrichment) cannot  be directly related to the
findings  of  the  COE,  TVA,  and USBR assessments due to differences in
analytical methods.  However, a few complementary findings are noted:

          A decrease in dissolved oxygen from the upstream  to downstream
          was found  in 22  to 50  percent of large power impoundments in
          the EPA analysis.

          According to the other agency assessments, 20 percent  of COE's
          projects, 38 percent of TVA's projects, and 4 percent of USBR's
          projects experience low dissolved  oxygen in tailwaters.

          Low dissolved  oxygen occurs  more frequently  in eastern dams,
          particularly in southeastern dams.

          Phosphorous, a  potential indicator of eutrophication, occurred
          at levels above a guidance of 0.025 mg/1 in 58 to 78 percent of
          large power  impoundments in  the  EPA  analysis.  High nutrient
          levels (presumably a  mix  of  nitrogen  and  phosphorous) were
          reported  in  35  percent  of  COE's  pools, 30 percent'T)f TVA's
          pools, and 15 percent  of  USBR's   pools   in  the  other agency
          assessments.

     The study  identifies water  quality mitigation  methods that can be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis:

          induced mixing of the impoundment pool;

          aeration of the bottom  layer of  a stratified  impoundment and
          aeration of impoundment releases;


                                  ix

-------
dredging to remove sediment deposits;

selective withdrawal to provide a choice of withdrawal depth;
habitat improvement of downstream pools to support desired fish
populations;

watershed   management   to   reduce   upstream   nutrient  and
contaminant sources that drain to an impoundment;

constraining reservoir  releases to maintain target minimums or
to be less than target maximums.

-------
                            TABLE  OF  CONTENTS


                                                                  Page

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	i i

      WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS	i i i
      RESULTS OF EPA ANALYSES	iv
      CASE STUDIES	v
      MITIGATION MEASURES	v
      FEDERAL AGENCY ASSESSMENTS	vii
      CONCLUSIONS	ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS	xi

LIST OF TABLES	xvi

LIST OF FIGURES	xvi i

I.     INTRODUCTION	1-1

      OBJECTIVES AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT	1-1
      PURPOSES AND NUMBERS OF IMPOUNDMENTS	1-4
      ANALYTICAL DEVELOPMENT	1-6
      OVERVIEW OF REPORT CONTENTS	1-12

II.   WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS	II-l

      STRATIFICATION	II-2
            Low Hypolimnetic Dissolved Oxygen (DO)	II-3
            Increased Iron and Manganese	11-3
            Hydrogen Sulfide Production	11-4
            Denitrif ication	II-4
            Thermal  Changes	11 -4

      EUTROPHICATION	~... 11-5

      OTHER CHANGES	II-6
            Gaseous Supersaturation	II-6
            Salt Concentrations	II-6
            Sediment Movement	11 -7
            Flow Regulation	II-7
            Reaeration Denial	II-8
            Fish Entrainment	II-8
            Toxics Accumulation	II-9
                                   xi

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

III.  EPA ANALYSES	III-l

     OBJECTIVES	III-l

     PRELIMINARIES	111-2
         The Population and Associated Data	III-3
         Sampling	111-4
         Obtaining Sample Dams	111-6
         Other Logical  Checks and Data Sources	111-6

     MIXING ANALYSIS	III-7
         Relationship of Froude Number to Mixing	III-7
         Findings	III-9

     DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAM TAILWATERS	111-11
         Oak Ridge National Laboratory Study	III-ll
         Fi ndi ngs	111 -12

     UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY	111-16
         Acquiring Water Quality Data	111-16
         Limitations of the Water Quality Data	111-17
         Statistical Comparison of Means	111-18
         Findings	111-19

    PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS	111-20
         Relationship of Phosphorus Enrichment and
           Eutrophication	111-21
         TVA and CE Results	111-24
         Phosphorus Retention Regression Model	111-25
         Findings	II1-26

IV.  CASE STUDIES	IV-1

         INTRODUCTION	IV-1

         LOW DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND/OR INCREASED
           IRON AND MANGANESE	IV-3
              J. Percy Priest Lake and Dam	IV-3
              Old Hickory Lake, Lock, and Dam	IV-10
              Richard B. Russell Lake and Dam	._. .IV-11
              Upper Bear Creek Reservoir and Dam	 .IV-13
              Casitas Lake and Dam	IV-15
              Lake Cachuma and Bradbury Dam	IV-16

         EUTROPHICATION	IV-17
              Guntersvi 11 e Reservoi r and Dam	IV-17
              Boone Reservoi r and Dam	IV-18
              Eau Gal 1 e Lake and Dam	IV-20
                                  xn

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

         FLOW REGULATION/REAERATION DENIAL	IV-21
              Norris Reservoir and Dam	IV-21
              Mark Twain Lake and Clarence Cannon Dam	IV-23
              Fort Patrick Henry Reservoir and Dam	IV-23

         SEDIMENT MOVEMENT	IV-25
              Lake Red Rock and Dam	IV-25

         THERMAL CHANGES	IV-26
              Flaming Gorge Reservoir and Dam	IV-26

         NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE EFFECTS	IV-28
              McCloud Reservoi r and Dam	IV-28

         SUMMARY	IV-29

V.  MITIGATION MEASURES	V-l

         WATER QUALITY CONTROL IN THE RESERVOIR	V-2
              Induced Mixing	V-2
              Aeration of the Hypolimnion	V-3
              Dredging	V-4

         WATER QUALITY CONTROL OF TAILWATERS	V-4
              Aeration of Reservoir Releases	V-4
              Selective Withdrawal of Reservoir Water	V-5
              Habitat Improvement of Tailwaters	V-6

         OTHER MITIGATION MEASURES	V-7
              Watershed Management	V-7
              Operational Changes	V-9

VI. FEDERAL AGENCIES' WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS...VI-1

         INTRODUCTION	VI-1

         CORPS OF ENGINEERS	VI-2
              Background	VI-2
              COE Water Quality Assessment	VI-4
         TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY	VI-8
              Background	VI-8
              TVA Water Quality Assessment	VI-10
         THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION	VI-16
              Background	VI-16
              USBR Water Qual ity Assessment	VI-17
         OVERVIEW	VI-24
                                  xm

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)




VII.  CONCLUSIONS	VII-1



         WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS	VII-2



         RESULTS OF EPA ANALYSES	VII-4




         AGENCY ASSESSMENTS	VII-6



         SUMMARY OF EPA ANALYSES AND AGENCY ASSESSMENTS	VII-9



APPENDIX A.   REFERENCES	A-l



APPENDIX B.   SAMPLE/CASE STUDY DATA BASE	B-l



APPENDIX C.   ANALYSIS SUPPLEMENT	C-l



         MIXING MODEL	C-l



         PHOSPHORUS RETENTION MODEL	C-3



         PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTE ESTIMATORS	C-5



         SIGNIFICANCE OF CORRELATION	C-6




         SAMPLE SIZE	C-8



         SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVENESS	C-9



         STORET WATER QUALITY RETRIEVAL SUMMARIZATIONS	C-12



APPENDIX D.   LARGE NONPOWER DAM SUPPLEMENT	D-l



         MIXING ANALYSIS	D-l



         DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAM TAILWATERS	D-l



         UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY	D-l



         PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS	D-3



APPENDIX E.   SMALL DAM SUPPLEMENT	J. .E-l



         MIXING ANALYSIS	E-l



         DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAM TAILWATERS	E-l



         UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY	E-l



         PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS	E-5



         REMARKS	E-5
                                  xiv

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

APPENDIX F.   CORPS OF ENGINEER'S ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT	F-l

         GENERAL	F-l

         WATER QUALITY STATUS OF CORPS OF ENGINEER'S PROJECTS	F-4
              Introduction	F-4
              Methods	F-5
              Assessment.	F-6

         FUTURE DIRECTION	F-10

APPENDIX G.   TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY'S ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT..G-l

         INTRODUCTION	G-l

         ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY	G-l

         RESERVOIR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT	6-2

         TAILWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY	G-2
              Reservoir Management Strategy	G-3
              Watershed Management Strategy	G-4

         POLICIES - WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT	G-5
              Water Quality Policies, Codes, and Instructions	G-5

         RECOMMENDATIONS	6-7
              Water Quality Research Recommendations	G-9
              Reservoir Research Recommendations	G-10
              Technology Development Recommendations	G-ll
              Operational Monitoring Recommendations	G-ll

APPENDIX H.   U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION'S ASSESSMENTS SUPPLEMENT.H-l

         AGENCY ASSESSMENTS	H-l

         THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION	H-4
              Unique Features of the Bureau of Reclamation	H-6
              Reclamations of Salinity Control Program	H-7
              The Changing Nature of the Reclamation Program...._. .H-8

         ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS IN BUREAU OF
           RECLAMATION RESERVOIRS AND TAILWATERS	H-10

         CONCLUSIONS	H-ll

         REFERENCES	H-12

         RECOMMENDATIONS	H-22

APPENDIX I.   AGENCY QUESTIONNAIRE USED IN DEVELOPING ASSESSMENTS.1-1
                                  XV

-------
                             LIST OF TABLES


Number         Title                                              Page
III-l      Partitioning Criteria	111-4
III-2      National Potential  Mixing Percentages for
             Large Dams	111-10
III-3      Probabilities of Non-Compliance with 5 mg/1
             Dissolved Oxygen for Power Dams	111-14
111-4      Upstream/Downstream Water Quality Changes in Large
             Power Dams	111-19
III-5      Selected Summary of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in
             the Pool	111-22
111-6      TVA Trophic Status Data	111-24
III-7      Summary Statistics for Total Phosphorus, Total
             Nitrogen, and Chlorophyll-a in the Mixed Layer
             During the Growing Season	111-25
II1-8      Phosphorus Enrichment Results for Large Power Dams...111-27
IV-1       Comparison of Principal Features of Case Study
             Impoundments/Dams	IV-4
IV-2       Case Study Profiles:   Principal Effects of Dams
             on Water Qua!ity	IV-6
IV-3       Case Study Profiles:   Mitigation Measures	IV-8


C-l        Sample Sizes for 95% Significant R2	C-7
C-2        Signi fi cance of El ementary Model s	C-8
C-3        Summary of Geographic Distribution	C-10
C-4        Results of the KS Test for Sample Distributions	C-12
C-5        Water Qua! i ty Parameters	C-13
C-6        Number of Dams Report! ng Data	C-13
C-7        Average Number of Observations per Dam for Dams
             Reporting Data	._.C-14
D-l        Probabilities of Non-Compliance with 5 mg/1
             Dissolved Oxygen for Large Nonpower Dams	D-2
D-2        Tallies of Water Quality Changes in Large Nonpower
             Dams	D-3
                                xvi

-------
                             LIST OF  FIGURES

Number         Title                                              Page


1-1        Population of All Dams	1-7

III-l      Population of Large Power Dams	III-5
111-2      Population of Large Nonpower Dams	III-5
III-3      Population of Small Dams	III-5
III-4      Stratification versus Densimetric Froude Number
             for TVA Reservoi rs	111 -8
III-5      Geographical Breakdown of Regions for the Oak Ridge
             National Laboratory Study	111-13
III-6      Distribution of 73 CE Hydropower Projects and
             Their Tailwater Conditions	111-15
III-7      Vollenweider Model Performance	111-26

IV-1       Location and Name of Case Study Impoundments..	IV-2

VI-1       Geographic Distribution of Corps of Engineer's Water
             Resources Projects	VI-3
VI-2       Geographic Distribution of a Ten Percent, Stratified,
             Random Sample of Corps of Engineer's Projects
             for Which Questionnaires Have Been Received	VI-3
VI-3       Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in COE Tailwaters	VI-5
VI-4       Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in COE Impoundments	VI-6
VI-5       The Tennessee Valley Authority's Multipurpose Water
             Resource System	VI-9
VI-6       Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in TVA Reservoir Pools	VI-11
VI-7       User Impact Assessment for TVA Reservoir Pools	VI-12
VI-8       Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in TVA Tailwaters	VI-13
VI-9       User Impact Assessment for TVA Reservoir Tailwaters	VI-14
VI-10      Geographic Distribution of Responses to Water
             Quality Assessment of Bureau of Reclamation
             Reservoirs by State	VI-18
VI-11      Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in USBR Reservoirs	VI-19
VI-12      User Impacts of Water Quality Conditions on User
             Benefits at USBR Reservoirs	VI-20
VI-13      Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in Tailwaters of USBR Reservoirs	VI-21
VI-14      Impacts of Water Quality on User Benefits at USBR
             Reservoirs	VI-22
                                  xvi i

-------
                             LIST OF FIGURES
                              (Continued)
VII-1      Percentages of Mixing Tendency	VII-4
VI1-2      Probabilities of Non-compliance (PNC)  with 5 mg/1
             Dissolved Oxygen (DO)	VII-5
VII-3      Summary of Quantitative Analyses of Large Power
             Dams	VII-7

C-l        Volume Distributions (large power dams)	C-ll

F-l        Geographic Distribution of Corps of Engineer's Water
             Resource Projects	F-12
F-2        Geographic Distribution of a Ten Percent, Stratified,
             Random Sample of Corps of Engineer's Projects for
             Which Questionnaires Have Been Received	F-12
F-3        Frequency of Occurrence of Occasionally Problematic,
             Intermittently Problematic, Chronically Problematic,
             and Non-problematic Water Quality Conditions in
             Tailwaters	F-13
F-4        Frequency of Occurrence of Occasionally Problematic,
             Intermittently Problematic, Chronically Problematic,
             and Non-problematic Pool Water Quality Conditions....F-13

G-l        The Tennessee Valley Authority's Multipurpose Water
             Resource System	G-12
G-2        Rate of Recurrence and User Impact Assessment for
             TVA Reservoir Pools for the Indicated Parameters	G-13
G-3        Rate of Recurrence and User Impact Assessment for
             TVA Reservoir Tailwaters for the Indicated
             Parameters	G-14

H-l        Geographic Distribution of Responses for Water
             Quality Assessment of Bureau of Reclamation
             Reservoirs by State (Total-250)	H-13
H-2        Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in USER Reservoirs	H-14
H-3        Impacts of Water Quality Conditions on User Benefits
             at USBR Reservoirs	H-15
H-4        Water Quality Conditions in Tailwaters of USBR
             Reservoirs	H-16
H-5        Impacts of Water Quality on User Benefits -
             Tailwaters	 .H-17
H-6        Frequency of Occurrence of Water Quality Conditions
             in USBR Reservoirs	H-18
H-7        Impacts of Water Quality Conditions on User
             Benefits at USBR Reservoirs.	 .H-19
H-8        Water Quality Conditions in Tailwaters of USBR
             Reservoirs	H-20
H-9        Impacts of Water Quality on User Benefits -
             Tailwaters	H-21
                               XVTM

-------
                             I.  INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT

     The objective of this document is to fulfill EPA's responsibility to
provide a report to Congress on Dam Water Quality in  response to Section
524 of  the Water  Quality Act  of 1987.   The report addresses the water
quality effects associated with impoundments and attempts to estimate the
character and national extent of these effects.  The specific language of
Section 524 is:

     Sec. 524 DAM WATER QUALITY STUDY

       "The Administrator,  in cooperation  with interested States
       and Federal  agencies, shall  study and monitor the effects
       on the quality  of  navigable  waters  attributable  to the
       impoundment of  water by  dams.   The results of such study
       shall be submitted to Congress not later than  December 31,
       1987."

     The effects  of impoundments  on water  quality has  been a topic of
interest for many years.   At  a  1963  symposium  on  impoundments, W.E.
Knight, from the state of North Carolina, summed up the situation (USHEW,
1965):

          "The effects of storage on water  quality have  been the
       subject  of  much  study  by  Federal  and  State agencies.
       Thermal stratification of lakes has boor  ^ecognized by man
       since he  first dived  into a lake as    ound the water near
       the bottom colder than that at the  jr1 :•„?.    Likewise, the
       fact that  at times  water near'  t      '      ""a reservoir
       contains little, if any,  dissolved  oxygen  has  long been
       known.  Studies of the concentration of dissolved o'vgenjn
       water discharged from reservoirs  indicate that  du,  ing the
       critical summer  period, dams  with deep intakes discharged
       water of  very  low  dissolved  oxygen  content,  dams with
       intermediate intakes  discharged water  of higher dissolved
       oxygen content, and dams with high-level intakes discharged
       water with even higher dissolved oxygen content."

Furthermore,  based  on  26  years  of  data,  eminent researcher Milo A.
Churchill of the Tennessee Valley Authority, concluded (USHEW, 1965):
                                  1-1

-------
       "If water is released through low-level  outlets in the dam,
       significant effects on downstream  water temperature result
       during  the  warmer  months.    If water is released through
       high-level outlets, the reservoir may have little effect on
       water temperature".

     Thus, it  is well  known that deep reservoirs thermally stratify and
can have poor water  quality in  their deeper  layers.   It is  also well
known that  reservoirs retain  plant nutrients,  nitrogen, and phosphorus
and can  become eutrophic  or filled  with excessive  aquatic plants from
microscopic algae  up to, and including, large plants, like water lilies.
Unwanted effects can be mitigated, if  deemed necessary,  in several ways
from the  aeration of  tail waters for oxygen restoration to the watershed
control of nutrients to avoid overfertilization of impoundments.

     During the past fifteen years,  federal  agencies responsible  for the
planning, construction, operation, and/or regulation of impoundments have
taken the initiative and attempted to address many of the  emerging water
quality issues.  In 1978, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) released a
report that "identifies adverse impacts on water quality  and stream uses
that are associated with water releases from dams operated as part  of the
TVA  water  management  system"  (TVA,  1978).    TVA  identifies several
reservoirs as  having dissolved  oxygen concentrations  in their releases
that do not constantly attain numerical criteria.

     In 1976, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CE) conducted a survey to
identify  and  assess  the  magnitude  of environmental and water quality
problems at their reservoir and waterway projects, and to determine major
research needs  to address  these problems  (Keeley, et al., 1978).  This
information was incorporated into  a  research  and  development program,
Environmental and  Water Quality Operational Studies (EWQOS), designed to
provide new or improved technology for  addressing the  environmental and
water  quality  problems  associated  with  these  projects,  in a manner
compatible  with  authorized  project   purposes.     The  EWQOS  program
represents an  eight-year research effort (1977-1985), and included areas
such as  predictive  techniques  to  help  describe,  predict,  and model
various aspects  of reservoir  hydrodynamics, ecology,  and water quality
processes.  Reservoir operational  and  management  techniques  were also
developed and evaluated.

     The  U.S.  Bureau  of  Reclamation  has increasingly addressed water
quality and other environmental issues for their projects  since the late
1960's.    Procedures  have  been  pursued for the incorporation of water
quality  factors  in   project   planning,   design,   construction,  and
operations.    Supporting  research  has  also  been conducted  including
special programs to address irrigation return flows.
                                   1-2

-------
      EPA  currently  addresses  water   quality   issues  pertaining  to
impoundments as part  of  the nonpoint source program of State  and local
water quality  oversight  and area wide  management  plans.   In  1982,  the
National Wildlife Federation pressed an unsuccessful suit against EPA to
regulate dams as point sources rather than continue their regulation under
areawide  wastewater  management  plans.    All   parties  to  this  suit
acknowledged various water quality changes brought about  by impoundments.
What is missing in  the transcripts is an  estimate of the magnitude of the
situation nationally.

      This report,  with  its ramifications,  is of  interest to the States
and Federal  agencies that  manage impoundments as  well  as those agencies
responsible  for regulating impoundments.  As requested by  Section 524,
several States and  Federal agencies  were solicited for their suggestions
and ideas.   Federal  agencies  have  also  provided  case  studies  to this
report  to  illustrate water  quality changes  and  mitigative methods  to
counter change at a variety of sites.

      With this background in mind,  the following questions are addressed
in this report:

      1.    What are the effects of  impoundments  on water quality?
      2.    What mitigation measures can reverse  unwanted effects?
      3.    What is  the  national  extent of  significant water  quality
            effects?

      The answers to questions  1 and 2  are  definitive  and are supported
with case  studies.   The answers to question  3  are based on elementary
statistical  tests  using limited random sampling  and   therefore  give  a
preliminary  estimate  of  the  national   scope  of  water  quality  effects
associated with impoundments.   For  some aspects, a national assessment
could not be made.   More work and   analysis are necessary to make these
answers definitive.

      Section  524  of the  Clean Water  Act  requires EPA to  "study  and
monitor the  effects  on  the  quality of  navigable  waters" due to water
impoundment.  Thus, the  scope of this  report  is  limited to historically
documented ambient water quality effects.   The report  does  not  address
effects on  biological  habitat  or  wetlands, which  may  be  substantial.
Further, the study  is  focused on the effects of existing  impoundments and
does  not  attempt  to assess  the water  quality  or biological  effects
associated with new  impoundments of free-flowing  waters  in particular
geographic  areas.     Flooding   to   create  new  impoundments  may  cause
significant hydrologic changes to the river and destroy wetland and upland
habitat, and often raises profound environmental questions. These effects
and questions  are  evaluated  by  EPA  on  a site-by-site  basis  through  the
Environmental Impact  Statement process and as otherwise  required by State
and Federal  law,  but are beyond  the  scope of this  report.
                                  1-3

-------
PURPOSES AND NUMBERS OF IMPOUNDMENTS

      Impoundments are  created  for a variety  of purposes that  provide
important social,  economic,  and  aesthetic benefits.   Most  projects  serve
multiple  purposes.     Understanding  these  purposes  is  important  for
providing a context in which to evaluate their water quality consequences.
Brief descriptions of the more common purposes  are as follows:

      • Hydropower Generation -  Large  hydropower projects tend  to  have
        sizable volumes and high dams. Several large TVA projects, though
        multi-purpose in design  and  use,  have  as one of  their  purposes
        hydropower  generation.     However,  low  head  small   hydropower
        projects are more common.  There  is  a current interest  in add-on
        hydropower and  this  typically  is associated with  low  hydraulic
        heads.  Developers of such  projects seek licenses which give them
        rights of eminent domain and guaranteed markets.   Such  private
        development of  add-ons  to public projects  can  be a concern  to
        water control    agencies because  the associated purposes were not
        included in the original  design.  Federal and state regulators do
        review these add-on  projects for  water  quality impacts.

      • Pump  Storage  Hydropower  - These projects  can be sizable  and
        typically have two water storage pools—a lower pool and an  upper
        pool—with combination turbine/pump(s)  between the pools.  These
        combined units  are  used to balance  power generation with  power
        demand.   In low demand  periods,  water  is pumped  from  the  lower
        pool to the upper pool to create potential  energy.   In high demand
        periods,  the  potential   energy  is converted back to  power  by
        release through turbines to the  lower pool.

      • Navigation - There are numerous navigation projects, having locks,
        run-of-river  dams,   and levees.    These  facilities  provide  a
        reliable  transportation  route   for  commercial,  military,  and
        private transport.  Study of polluted navigation  pools on the Ohio
        River, by the  Public  Health  Service nearly  75 years  ago, led to
        the  Streeter-Phelps   water quality model   of  dissolved oxygen
        (Streeter, 1925).

      • Flood  Control  - These projects  have a  permanent  pool  which  is
        small in comparison  to the  large volume set aside to trap floods.
        A large number  of  "dry  dams" have a very small or no  permanent
        pool.                                                  _

      • Water Supply - Water is  stored for public or private  use and may
        include irrigation of agricultural  areas.

      • Conservation  -   A   large  number of  small  private  and public
        projects are built to maintain ground water levels,  trap sediment,
        control gully  erosion,   provide  livestock  watering,   and  offer
        recreational  activities.   The Soil  Conservation  Service  (SCS)
        frequently assists in the design  of these facilities.
                                  1-4

-------
      • Recreation -  Typically,  recreation  is one use in a multi-purpose
        federal facility.   For example, Corps of Engineers' flood control
        projects  often  have   a  recreational  component.    In  private
        projects, recreation  may constitute the only purpose.   Private
        real estate lakes, like  Lake-of-the-Woods,  a  500-acre  lake that
        is the centerpiece of a single lot land development in  Virginia,
        are purely recreational.

      • Other  -   Many impoundments service  other uses such as  fish and
        wildlife  maintenance,  water quality  enhancement,  and  low flow
        augmentation.    A combination  of these with  the above  uses  is
        common and play an important role in water resource management.


      The development  of  water resource  projects  in the  public sector
follows a  procedure that seeks  benefits,  in terms of  achieving stated
purposes,  in excess  of costs.  Since passage  of the National Environmental
Policy Act, this assessment process has explicitly included consideration
of  environmental consequences.    Development  of  private  projects  is
dependent  upon generation of  profits  to justify their  capitalization.
Regulated activities  in the private  sector  also  are required  to satisfy
environmental  concerns to secure development rights.

      In  addition to  understanding impoundment  purposes,  an  accurate
estimate  of the  preponderance  of  facilities  is  necessary  to  assess
national water quality effects.  Identifying or counting all of these dams
is no small task.  To expedite this effort,  several  existing inventories
were evaluated.

      The U.S. Army Corps of  Engineers compiled  an  inventory of dams  in
the United States as  part of  its National Program of Inspection of Non-
Federal  Dams  (CE,  1982a).    This  inventory,  which was  completed  in
September 1980, includes dams  which are in excess of 6 feet in height and
have a  maximum water   impounding capacity of at least 50  acre-feet;  or
which are at least 25  feet in  height  and  have a maximum water impoundment
capacity  in  excess of 15  acre-feet.    The  inventory   contains  68,155
entries.   The  Soil  Conservation Service (SCS) estimated  an  additional
2,000,000 small farm pond  and  recreational dams with volumes less than 50
acre-feet,  or  dams less  than 25  feet  high.   Approximately  24,000  of
entries  in  the  inventory  have   received  technical  and/or  financial
assistance from the Soil Conservation Service.  These are the largest  of
the SCS-assisted dams.

      The 68,155  dams  in  the  Corps  of Engineers  inventory collectively
store 490  million acre-feet of water at the normal pool volume.  The Corps
of Engineers is associated with 166  million acre-feet (34  percent) and the
Bureau  of Reclamation  is associated  with  107 million acre-feet  (22
percent).   The Tennessee Valley Authority is  associated  with  10 million
acre-feet  (2 percent).
                                  1-5

-------
      The Corps of Engineers'  listing was  chosen as a realistic starting
point  for  a national  assessment.    Figure 1-1  shows the  geographical
distribution of the dams contained  in this 1980 inventory.   This listing
contains information on hazard potential  but also provides  the following
basic information:

      1.    Location and name.
      2.    Volume of impoundment.
      3.    Maximum depth of water  (at the dam).
      4.    Spillway design flow.
      5.    Length of dam crest.
      6.    Power generating capacity (if known and over 100 kW).
      7.    Purposes.

      By itself,  this is incomplete  information  for water quality analysis
purposes.   But,  it provides  an exhaustive  listing of dams  existing  in
1980.  More complete data for specific dams are available in compendiums
of water  quality information associated  with  Corps of  Engineers  dams.
These listings  are not exhaustive and are not statistically representative
of all impoundments.
ANALYTICAL DEVELOPMENT

      An approach to this nationwide assessment was developed through the
comment process  as  well  as a review of  the literature.   Review  of the
literature yielded numerous materials on  specific  case  studies,  generic
problem descriptions,  mitigation measures,  program reviews,  and  other
elements  of  the  issues  surrounding   the  water  quality  effects  of
impoundments.  A list of references cited  in  this  report appears  in the
reference section which  includes additional materials  reviewed but not
cited.  Three relatively recent references (TVA,  1978; Cada, et al., 1983;
Kennedy and  Gaugush,  1987) are representative of alternative approaches
to the  task  at  hand.   Each  tends  to  be  authoritative because  of the
expertise of the authors  and rigor of  their methods.   All  three are
sponsored by Federal agencies with  a  responsibility  of some  sort for
impoundments.    The  Tennessee  Valley   Authority  owns  and  operates
impoundments.  Cada,  et al.,  work for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL), which  is  under  the Department  of Energy.   Finally,  Kennedy and
Gaugush are  with the  U.S.  Army Corps of  Engineers  (CE), which manages a
large number of dams.  The development of  the analytical  approach for this
report to Congress is the result  of adapting relevant features of each of
these works  and making an application to  a nationwide assessment.

      TVA (1978)  adopted a  general approach to describing generic effects
and  mitigation  measures   while  taking   a  very  detailed  site-specific
examination  of many of their reservoirs:

      "Releases from Tennessee Valley reservoirs were evaluated with
      respect to their adverse impacts on  water quality  and related
      characteristics and on various uses of the water downstream.
      The water quality characteristics  examined were temperature,

                                  1-6

-------
                       Alaska
                       Hawa i i
                       Guam
                       Puerto Rico
                       Trust Terr.
- 167
- 123
-   1
-  70
-   2
                       Virgin Islands-   8
        Figure 1-1
Population of 68,155 Dams
   (Source:  CE, 1982b)
          1-7

-------
      dissolved oxygen,  resolubilization of metals, streamflow,  turbidity
      and suspended solids,  and gaseous  supersaturation.   The downstream
      water uses examined were recreation,  fisheries and other  aquatic
      life, water  supply, and  assimilative  capacity.  Evaluations  were
      based on available data  on water quality and  reservoir operations
      from  1970  through  1977  in  conjunction  with   biological   and
      engineering judgments  of  the  significance of the  impacts."

      The TVA study has  the  following major  features:

      • Evaluation  of  a  small  population  of  large  power-generating
        impoundments,

      • Detailed site-specific  analysis  of data to estimate  effects,

      • Analysis of pool and tailwater water quality,

      • Comprehensive  generic description of the "adverse  impacts on water
        quality and stream uses...",  and

      • Presentation  of   mitigation  measures   applicable   to   TVA's
        impoundments.

      Perhaps the most  significant difference between the TVA  study and
the one conceived  for this  report is the size of the population  to be
analyzed.    TVA  operates  a  total  of 47  reservoirs, of which 33  were
discussed  in  their study.   On a  national scale,  one   is faced  with
thousands of reservoirs.  TVA (1978)  argues  the following:

      "There  are   two   possible  methods  for   identifying  and
      determining the extent of impacts from reservoir  releases.
      The first method compares the releases from all structures to
      specific numerical criteria.   This  method simplifies problem
      identification and monitoring.  However, the  application of
      rigid, uniform numerical  criteria  may  overlook the  actual or
      highest value uses and needs upstream and  downstream  from a
      specific project.   The second method determines the need  for
      improvements on  a  case-by-case  basis and emphasizes  providing
      balanced protection of the water  uses associated  with each
      specific project without  unduly penalizing  any given project
      by the application of rigid numerical criteria.  Although this
      method makes problem identification and subsequent monitorang
      efforts  much  more difficult,  it  provides the  flexibility
      needed to optimize resource management."

      For the scope of TVA's study, a case-by-case approach is  sensible.
However,  for  the  purposes   of  this   report   to  Congress,   "problem
identification" is required as  a necessary first  step towards a national
strategy to "optimize  resource  management."  Specific numerical  criteria
                                  1-8

-------
are used  sparsely in  this  report to  Congress.   Also,  recognizing  the
importance of  in-depth investigations of  specific  sites,  several  case
studies have been incorporated in this report to provide a high level  of
detail.

      Several features of the TVA study have been adopted for this report.
First,  the  water  quality  in  both the  impoundment itself  and in  the
downstream tailwaters are examined.   This  report takes the analysis  one
step  further and compares  upstream water  quality  to downstream  water
quality to assess the changes  in  the  vicinity  of, if  not  caused by,  the
impoundment.

      Second, the TVA study  and this report present a generic description
of the water  quality effects associated with  impoundments.  In fact, much
of the material  included in this  report's  discussion  of generic effects
is taken from the TVA study.  TVA  also  discussed generic effects on water
uses.    This  was  excluded  from this report  because,  although important,
this   pertains   more  to   resource   management  rather   than   problem
identification.   Furthermore,  water uses are often designated  based  on
water quality, making the assessment of uses somewhat subjective.

      Finally, TVA presented a  generic  discussion of mitigation measures.
This report also provides this information, much of  which was taken from
the TVA study.

      A second approach  to  the subject  is  presented  by the  ORNL  study
(Cada, et al., 1983), which  has the following abstract:

      "One  of  the  environmental  issues  affecting  small-scale
      hydropower development in the United States is water quality
      degradation.    The  extent  of  this   potential  problem,  as
      exemplified  by  low  dissolved  oxygen   concentrations  in
      reservoir  tailwaters,  was   analyzed   by  pairing  operating
      hydroelectric sites with dissolved oxygen measurements from
      nearby  downstream  U.S.   Geological   Survey  water  quality
      stations.  These data were used to calculate probabilities of
      noncompliance (PNCs), that is the probabilities that dissolved
      oxygen  concentrations in the discharge waters  of  operating
      hydroelectric dams will  drop below 5  mg/1.  The continental
      states  were grouped into eight regions based on geographic and
      climatic similarities.  Most regions  had higher mean PNCs in
      summer  than in winter,  and summer PNCs were greater for large-
      scale than  for  small-scale hydropower facilities.  Cumulative
      probability distributions  of  PNC  also  indicated  that  low
      dissolved oxygen concentrations in the tailwaters of operating
      hydroelectric dams are  phenomena largely confined  to sites
      with large-scale facilities."

      The ORNL study has the following major features:

      • Evaluation of a  population  of power generating impoundments based
        on a  survey of available  data,

                                  1-9

-------
      •  Analysis of  dissolved  oxygen data  from STORE! (EPA's  national
        water  quality  data  base)   using  a  numerical   criterion   and
        statistical methods,

      •  Analysis of tailwaters only,  and

      •  Regional and seasonal  evaluation of the data.

      The ORNL study attempts to draw national  conclusions  based  on  the
pairing   of  a  power  dam with  available dissolved  oxygen data meeting
specified criteria.  While national in scope, the study could not make the
claim that the sites analyzed were representative.  It  is desirable  for
this report to Congress to be  based  on representative  sites.

      ORNL disaggregates  available  data geographically and  seasonally.
If  sufficient   data  exist  to  provide   a  complete   picture,   data
disaggregation  can  highlight  the  most  pronounced results  which  may
otherwise be buried  in an aggregated data  set.   This  report to Congress
includes  a  revisitation  of  the ORNL  study   of   dissolved  oxygen  to
illustrate some of the  advantages of disaggregation  and its importance to
the national  perspective.  Resource limitations precluded performing such
an  approach  on all  parameters  including  the  pool  and the  tailwaters.
However,  this  report  does  take  the  ORNL  study  one  step further  by
identifying  a  representative  sample of  sites  which moves  toward  an
assessment of national  scope.

      A  third  approach to the subject  is  an ongoing  study by  the  Army
Corps of Engineers.    Intermediate  progress  in this  effort  has  been
reported by Kennedy and Gaugush  (1987).   A  brief  summary of this study is
obtained from the paper's abstract:

      "Increasing  concern  over  the  quality  of freshwaters  and
      growing emphasis on the development  of improved  methods  for
      the management of its existing water resource projects,  led
      to the initiation of several major  water research programs by
      the U.S. Army  Corps of  Engineers.   One such  effort  involves
      the compilation  and  analysis  of a  Corps-wide water quality
      database for reservoirs  and tailwaters.  These data are being
      supplemented   with   subjective    information    concerning
      enhancement  needs solicited from  field offices.   The  survey
      involves over  750 reservoirs,  locks  and  dams, and dry dams.
      Most  frequently  cited during  the survey  were  the need -to
      improve tailwater conditions (particularly dissolved oxygen,
      temperature  extremes, and  the presence  of reduced  metals),
      reduce  nutrient  concentrations,  and  ameliorate  conditions
      associated with  the eutrophication process.  A preliminary
      investigation of southeastern  reservoirs  indicated:  1) lower
      total  nitrogen concentrations  than the national  average, 2)
      significant  longitudinal gradients  in water  quality,  and 3)
      turbidity and flushing rate as probable constraints to primary
      production."
                                 MO

-------
      The CE study has the following features:

      • Evaluation  of the CE  water resources  projects, which  include
        reservoirs, locks and dams, and dry dams built predominantly for
        the purposes of flood control,  recreation, and water supply,

      • An analysis of  dissolved  oxygen as it  compares  to  the physical
        features of a dam,

      • Analysis   of   nutrients,   metals,   and  dissolved   oxygen  in
        southeastern reservoirs by comparing  discharges  or  releases and
        inflows based on STORE! data,

      • A growing season analysis as well as an investigation into water
        quality gradients in the pool,  and

      • Qualitative presentation of water quality issues in the pool and
        tailwaters.

      Similar to the  other  two studies, Kennedy  and  Gaugush evaluate a
much  smaller  population of  impoundments than  is  of interest  for this
report to Congress.  CE  projects are  also oriented towards flood control,
recreation, and water supply as well as  power production.   The Corps of
Engineers  approach  of comparing the physical  features  of  a project to
water  quality  status  of  tailwaters   is  promising  because  if  such
relationships   can   be   found,   nationwide  assessments   are  greatly
facilitated.  Much more  is known  (or  is easily obtainable) about physical
features  than  is known  about  the water  quality at  unmonitored  sites.
Therefore,  this   report   to  Congress  endeavors   to   identify   those
relationships where they may exist.

      The  Corps  of Engineers,  STORET  comparison  of paired  inflow and
discharge concentrations of a given parameter also is expected to be quite
useful  because  it  addresses  the change  in water  quality  that  may be
caused, or at least facilitated,  by  an  impoundment.  Identified changes
may be both positive or  negative.  This report to Congress relies heavily
on both STORET data and  an analysis of  water quality changes between the
inflow and discharge.   STORET is the EPA supported national  computerized
repository for water quality data (USEPA, 1982a).

      The CE study approaches seasonality by performing a "growing season"
analysis  of  nitrogen,  phosphorus, and  chlorophyll.   The benefits  of a
seasonal approach have already  been discussed, although the scope of this
report to Congress has  been limited  to  a seasonal  analysis  of dissolved
oxygen.

      Lastly,  the  CE  report  is  addressing  the  water  quality  issues
generically and reporting the frequency of occurrence of various types of
problems.  This approach was also used  in the TVA study.
                                 Ml

-------
      In sum, the three studies presented here by the TVA,  ORNL,  and  CE
offer a representative  range of approaches and current thinking available
for this national  assessment.  The analytical approach for this report to
Congress was developed  to  take the most appropriate  features  of each--
within  budget  and  schedule  constraints—in  providing  an  informative
overview to Congress.
OVERVIEW OF REPORT CONTENTS

      The  major  features  of this  report and  their  location  in  this
document are as follows:

      • A  generic  description  of  water  quality  concerns  related  to
        impoundments  of   all   purposes  including  power   production,
        navigation, flood control, recreation, water supply, etc. (Chapter
        II);

      • A representative sampling methodology to arrive  at  a manageable
        sample from the  68,155  population of impoundments  for  analysis
        (Chapter III);

      • A mixing analysis  of impoundments to screen for stratification
        potential  based on  physical  characteristics  of  a site  (Chapter
        HI);

      • A seasonal and regional  examination  of dissolved oxygen  in the
        tailwaters (Chapter III);

      • An upstream/downstream comparison of concentrations of nutrients,
        metals, and dissolved oxygen  to  assess the changes facilitated by
        impoundments (Chapter III);

      • An analysis of nutrient  enrichment in the pool (Chapter III); and

      • A presentation of case studies to examine site-specific situations
        (Chapter IV);  and

      • A generic discussion of  mitigation measures  applicable  to water
        quality in the pool and/or the tailwaters (Chapter V).

      • Agency assessments  of approaches  and  need pertaining Jto water
        quality issues for their own programs (Chapter VI).

      Each of these concepts has been used in prior endeavors except for
the nationwide representative sampling.   The purpose of sampling,  if the
available data support it,  is to extrapolate results  of the analysis to
provide a  national  characterization  of the  issues to  fulfill Congress'
information needs in this area.
                                 1-12

-------
               II.  WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS
     This  chapter  presents  an  overview  of  the  potential  effects of
impoundments upon water quality.  Although  attention is  usually focused
on unwanted  effects, desirable  changes may  also result.   An  "ecosystem
perspective" is necessary since  issues  are  interdependent,   in varying
degrees, upon each other.  If one condition within the reservoir - stream
ecosystem is altered, its effects can ripple through the balanced system,
positively or  negatively affecting  other facets  of water quality.   The
following list  is  not  exhaustive,  but  provides  the  major potential
reservoir-stream ecosystem changes:
            STRATIFICATION
                    Low Hypolimnetic Dissolved Oxygen
                    Increased Iron & Manganese
                    Hydrogen Sulfide
                    Denitrification
                    Thermal Changes
            EUTROPHICATION

            OTHER CHANGES
                    Gaseous Supersaturation
                    Salinity Changes
                    Sediment Movement
                    Flow Regulation
                    Reaeration Denial
                    Fish Entrainment
                    Toxics Accumulation

     The above  effects do  not occur in every impoundment system.   Their
occurrence and magnitude depend on many  factors, including  depth  of the
reservoir, climate,  watershed land  use, reservoir siting, and reservoir
features.  Some—land use, siting, and  reservoir features—are. at least
partially   controllable,   while   others--climate--are  uncontrollable.
Certain  geographic  regions  have  their  own   dominant  water  quality
concerns.   A brief overview of each potential effect is discussed  in the
following sections.
                                 II-l

-------
STRATIFICATION

    Water quality effects in the discharges of reservoirs can result from
seasonal  warming  and  consequent  thermal  stratification  of impounded
waters  (Cada  et.al,  1983).     However, not all reservoirs stratify and
stratification,  by  itself,  is  not  a  water  quality  problem.     The
occurrence of this effect depends on several  factors, including reservoir
surface area, depth, volume,  detention time,  degree of  protection from
the wind,  and climatic conditions of the geographical area (Cada et. al,
1983).  For example, run-of-river impoundments are located on main  stream
rivers and  are characterized  by low  head dams with impounded water not
extending far from the natural  channel.  Detention times are on the order
of  a  few  days.    Since  water velocities are appreciable, significant
vertical stratification typically does not occur (USEPA, 1973).

    In contrast,  storage reservoirs  are generally  located on tributary
streams and  are relatively  deep, with  the water  surface extending far
beyond the natural river channel.  These reservoirs have a  large storage
capacity in  relation to the drainage area and generally have a detention
time  of  several  months.    They   can  be   characterized  by  thermal
stratification,  usually  of  the  classic three layer system, during the
summer warm periods  (USEPA,  1973).    The  upper  layer  is  termed the
epilimnion.  A zone of rapid drop in temperature occurs below this and is
called the thermocline.   Below  the  thermocline  is  a  zone  of fairly
uniform,  cooler  temperatures  called  the  hypolimnion.    In the fall,
surface temperatures cool to the same temperature as  the hypolimnion and
the  stratification  is  disrupted,  with  the impounded water completely
mixing.  The warmer climate of  the  Southeast  and  Great  Basin regions
results  in  thermal  stratification    occurring earlier in the year and
remaining longer than in the Northeast or Northwest  (Cada et  al,  1983).
A wind-driven  turnover may  also occur  in the  spring when  there is no
vertical temperature gradient.

    Thermal stratification often results  in stratification  of important
water quality  chemical parameters, such as dissolved oxygen, metals, and
nutrients.    These  parameters  are  discussed  in  more  detail  in the
following sections.   It  is important  to note  that stratification is a
natural condition that occurs  in many  lakes.   The important difference
between the  lake and reservoir is that in a lake the epilimnetic waters,
generally  characterized  by  good  water  quality   and  reflecting  the
prevailing  average   ambient  air   temperatures,  are  released  to  an
outflowing stream.  In  a reservoir,  the hypolimnetic  waters, wjiich may
have  poorer  water  quality  (in  terms  of  dissolved oxygen, iron, and
manganese) than the pre-impounded stream,  can  be  released  through low
level outlets.   Some dams are constructed so that water can be withdrawn
at several different depths appropriate for  discharge to  the outflowing
stream.    As  a  result,  the  dam  may  not  have  a negative effect on
downstream conditions.   When  reservoirs do  not stratify  and are mixed
from top  to bottom, the water discharged does not represent a particular
zone and thus the  depth of  withdraw is  not critical  to water quality.
Water  quality  effects  associated  with  stratification may  include low
hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen,  increased  iron  and  manganese, hydrogen
sulfide, denitrification, and thermal changes.

                                   II-2

-------
Low Hypolimnetic Dissolved Oxygen (DO).

    During  certain  periods  of  the  year,  the  denser  waters  of the
hypolimnion remain relatively free  from turbulence  or other significant
water motions,  and have  no opportunity  for reaeration  at the surface.
Demands on oxygen are  present  because  of  bacterial  decay  of organic
matter, resulting  in oxygen-poor or anoxic waters.  Anoxic bottom waters
in reservoirs cannot support fish and  other aquatic  life.  Furthermore,
when large  volumes of  low DO  water are released, downstream waters are
also  adversely  affected.    Eventually,  through  turbulent  reaeration
processes downstream, DO levels return to normal.

    Low  tail water  DO  concentrations  generally  occur where reservoirs
remain stratified for longer periods and  contain relatively  warm waters
(Cada, et  al., 1983).   The  distance the stream needs to recover may be
great enough to  lower  the  stream's  assimilative  capacity  for oxygen
demanding wastes  from downstream  sources.   The anaerobic conditions of
the hypolimnion are also harmful to  water  quality  since  it  may cause
several  chemical   reactions  to  occur,  such  as  release  of  metals,
phosphorus, iron and manganese from bottom sediments.  Increases in iron,
ammonia,  manganese,  silica,  phosphate  and  sulfide ions, and  soluble
organic compounds  have been  observed in  anoxic waters  in contact with
bottom sediments.   In the fall and spring, uniform vertical temperatures
result in periods of mixing called the fall and spring turnovers.  During
these  times,  soluble  materials  entrapped  in the hypolimnion, such as
inorganic  nutrients,  iron  and  manganese  and  organic  material,  are
returned to the biologically active surface waters.  The nutrients become
available to support primary production and sometimes result  in fall and
spring  plankton  blooms  observed  in  many reservoirs and lakes (USEPA,
1973).

Increased Iron and Manganese.

    A water quality problem directly  tied  to  the  anoxic  waters  of a
hypolimnion is the increased concentrations of certain metals, especially
iron and manganese.  Reservoirs not stratified and thus without an anoxic
hypolimnicn usually  act as sinks for these metals, which remain adsorbed
to bottom sediments.   However, under  anoxic conditions  these insoluble
metals  may  become  soluble  and  are  released from the sediments, into
reservoir waters  as well  as downstream  waters.   Metals in significant
concentrations  can  be  harmful  to  fish  and  other  aquatic_life and
contaminate water  supplies.   When waters  are aerated  in the spillway,
iron  and  manganese  become  oxidized  and precipitate out of the water,
being deposited upon and  causing  discoloration  of  structures  and the
stream bed  of the  tailwaters.  Soluble iron oxidizes rather rapidly, so
that the effect on  downstream waters  is limited,  but soluble manganese
oxidizes  much  more  slowly  and  therefore  impacts  a much larger area
downstream (TVA, 1978).    High concentrations  of either  soluble iron or
manganese  can  adversely  impact  downstream  water supplies by staining
plumbing fixtures and laundry, affecting the taste and  aesthetic quality
of the water, and interfering with manufacturing processes.
                                  II-3

-------
Hydrogen Sulflde Production.

    Under  anaerobic  conditions  of  the  hypo "limn ion,  sulfate,  a common
constituent of  streams,   is   reduced  to  hydrogen   sulfide  (H^S).    If
present in  sufficient concentrations,  h^S can  reach  levels toxic to  fish
in the reservoir and downstream waters.   Hydrogen  sulfide can  also be an
odor problem  if enough  is released into the  atmosphere.  Finally, where
reservoirs  are  used  for  supplying  water  for   domestic  use,  sulfur
compounds can adversely affect water taste and  lower  water hardness.

Denitrification.

    Denitrification  only  occurs  in  the  absence   of  dissolved oxygen.
Facultative, anaerobic bacteria use  nitrate  and   reduce  it  to produce
nitrite as  an intermediate product, with the  final  principal end product
                                                      by  most organisms.
                                                      Denitrification can
                                                      impoundments, where
                                                      summer months.  The
being nitrogen gas--a nitrogen form  not  utilizable
Denitrification therefore  acts as  a nitrogen sink.
be an important  process  in  stratified,   eutrophic
anoxic conditions  occur in  the hypolimnion  in the
loss of gaseous nitrogen changes the nutrient balance,

Thermal Changes.

    Because stratification generates layers of warmer  and colder waters,
the water  withdrawn for
warmer  or  colder  than
systems  are  themselves
fish and warm water fish.
nuclear power  generation
energy or turbulence; the
                          release,  depending upon the inlet depth, may be
                          pre-impoundment  conditions.     Some stratified
                          beneficial   by providing habitat for cold water
                           Their  use  for  heat  exchange  in  fossil or
                          or  for pump storage operations can add thermal
                          stratification regime could be altered.
    In cold water streams an increase in temperature may be sufficient to
adversely impact the fish population inhabiting the system.  This adverse
impact has  a high  potential  for  the cool   water systems  in the South,
since most  of the  streams are  close to  the temperature borderline for
classification  as  cool   water  streams  (SCS,  1979).      The  elevated
temperatures may not be adverse to warm water fish (SCS, 1979).  Fish can
acclimate to rising temperatures if the rates of increase remain gradual,
but  death   occurs  once  their  absolute  thermal  ceiling  is  reached
(Schwiebert, 1984).  The receiving  stream  will  eventually  approach or
reach the  natural stream  temperature, but the distance required depends
on many factors, such as canopy cover and  groundwater flow  (SCJS, 1979).
Sometimes the  release of cold-water discharges of large reservoirs, like
the Ozark and  Tennessee  River  tailwaters,  can  create  new cold-water
fisheries downstream  (Schwiebert, 1984).   The Peapacton Dam on the east
branch of the Delaware River transforms a marginal  trout river  into one
of  the  best  major  trout  streams  in  the  East  (Schwiebert,  1984).
Reservoir construction on the San Juan  in New  Mexico changes  a coarse-
fish  habitat  into  an  excellent  rainbow  fishery  due  to  cold water
discharges (Schwiebert, 1984).  Impoundments and  resulting tailwaters in
the southern states creates a trout fishery resource equal to hundreds of
miles of natural coldwater streams (Pfitzer, 1974).  Some of these states
do not have a significant natural trout fishery.
                                  II-4

-------
    Fisheries created  by impoundments  may only  be seasonal  however,  if
the volume of cold water stored in the reservoir is insufficient to allow
releases to  occur until  the fall  turnover.  At that time,warm water  is
released into the tailwaters.  As a result the tailwater  is too  cold  in
spring and  early summer  for warm-water  fish production and too warm  in
late summer and fall to support cold-water fisheries (Pfitzer, 1974).
EUTROPHICATION

    Eutrophication  is  a  natural  process  that  occurs  not   only  in
reservoirs,  but   also  in   natural   lakes   and  other  water  bodies,
particularly those which have low velocity rates.   This process involves
increased  growth  and  death  rates of aquatic plants, usually resulting
                  of high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus.   Since algae
                  of a  complex food chain, there are numerous effects on
                  animals when the population and diversity of  algae are
                          eutrophication  and    stratification  can have
                          algae settle into the  hypolimnion  and increase
from the addition
are at  the base
higher plants and
changed.
compounded
 Furthermore,
effects.   Dead
demands on scarce oxygen resources through bacterial decay.  Algal  blooms
degrade reservoir quality by triggering imbalances in the oxygen cycle to
which other organisms, such as fish and smaller food-chain organisms, are
sensitive.  Excessive growths of certain blue-green algae  can also cause
taste and odor problems in drinking water.  During the day, the excessive
growths of algae produce DO through  photosynthesis, but  at night, algal
respiration depletes  DO concentrations and produces carbon dioxide which
reduces pH.  These daily fluctuations in pH  and DO  can have detrimental
effects on  other biota.   Once algae die, DO used in their decomposition
can significantly lower DO levels, particularly in the hypolimnion.

    The  anaerobic   environment   of   the   hypolimnion   can  increase
eutrophication by  causing releases  of phosphorus that would normally be
adsorbed to bottom sediments.  This  release can  initiate a  transfer of
soluble  phosphorus  from  the  sediment to hypolimnion to epilimnion and
provide nutrients during the growing season.  When  the lake destratifies
or completely  mixes, the  soluble phosphorus  is also most available for
algal utilization although  this  typically  occurs  at  the  end  of the
growing season.

    Eutrophication  can  also  include  the  excessive  growth  of rooted
aquatic  plants,   that   detract   from   aesthetic   qualities^  reduce
recreational  opportunities,  and also deplete DO resources when they die.
Eutrophication therefore may hinder recreational use  of a  reservoir and
impair  its  value  as  a  low  cost  treatable  water  supply.  Advanced
eutrophication is generally thought to  be  undesirable,  but  a moderate
amount  of  nutrient  enrichment  can  result  in  a desirably productive
system, oftentimes with improved sport fishing opportunities.
                                   II-5

-------
OTHER CHANGES

    There are a number of other changes associated with impoundments that
can  affect  water  quality.      These   are  not   directly  related  to
stratification   or   eutrophication   and   are,   therefore,   presented
separately.   They  include  gaseous  supersaturation,   salinity changes,
sediment   movement,   flow   regulation,   reaeration  denial,   and  fish
entrainment.

Gaseous Supersaturation.

    In reservoirs, supersaturation of  gases can  occur as  the result of
several  processes.    The  most  common manner in which impoundments may
cause supersaturation is  the  interaction  of  air-water  mixtures under
pressure  in  spillways  and  sluiceways  which can entrain air into deep
turbulent stilling basins  where  excessive  gases  are  dissolved.   The
injection of air, or reaeration of the hypolimnion may also contribute to
a state of supersaturation.  A  third cause  is heating  which  lowers the
saturation  point.    An  example  of  this  occurs  in the spring when a
reservoir receives gas saturated cold runoff water and  is also recharged
with  gases  during  the  turnover.     As  the  water  is heated through,
seasonal warming supersaturation  may  occur  (Bouck,  1980).    Dissolved
oxygen  is  extremely  bioactive  and  is  not  a  problem, but dissolved
nitrogen is biologically inert in vertebrates  and, therefore,   can cause
gas bubble  disease, a  disease analogous  to the  "bends" experienced by
divers.  The extent of this occurrence depends on vertical  velocities in
the tailwater,  bubble size,   the depth to which the bubbles are carried,
turbulence,  initial  concentration  of   dissolved   gases,   and  water
temperature  (TVA,  1978).    As  the water flows downstream the nitrogen
concentration tends  to equilibrate  with those  of the  atmosphere.  The
length of the stream reach before equilibrium depends on the rate of flow
and the physical characteristics of the stream channel  (TVA, 1978).

Salt Concentrations.

    When water evaporates, any salts present are left  behind,  causing an
increase in  salt concentration.   In  arid regions and areas where salts
are relatively abundant in  the  watershed  runoff,  salinity  levels can
reach  critical  proportions.    Reservoirs, by virtue of their increased
surface area, increase losses in regional   water budgets  through greater
evaporation.   Salinity may  also increase in reservoirs receiving return
flows from irrigation.  Many freshwater fish and other aquatic  life that
are  intolerant  to  relatively  high  or fluctuating salt concentrations
cannot survive such conditions.  Water with critical salt levels  is also
difficult and expensive to treat for human consumption.

    Not  all  reservoirs  have  a negative effect on salt concentrations.
For example, some flood control reservoirs  in the  arid west  store high
quality flood  flows in the spring and release required flows in the fall
and  winter,  greatly  improving  salinity  downstream.    In  Lake Mead,
dissolved  materials  normally  kept  in  solution  by carbon dioxide are
precipitated in the reservoir, thus decreasing salinity downstream.


                                  II-6

-------
Sediment Movement.

    Waters received  by reservoirs  generally carry higher sediment loads
than waters released from reservoirs.   Suspended sediment received by the
stream from  the upland  erosion,  along  with channel  erosion,  is carried
downstream.  When the streams enter a  quiet  body of  water, the sediment
load drops  out.   Reservoirs, therefore,  act as  large settling basins.
Reservoirs may fill up as a result of  this process  which must  either be
anticipated in design or mitigated by  dredging.

    Often,  horizontally  stratified  currents within  a reservoir, called
density currents, carry greater  sediment  loads  than  the  rest  of the
reservoir.   These currents  may then  be tapped for release downstream by
regulating  multiple-outlets,  a  feature  common  in   many  newer  dams.
Regulation of these currents facilitates sediment releases and can reduce
the frequency of dredging and sluicing operations.   Episodic intentional
releases of  silt laden  bottom waters to rid the impoundment of silt can
cause  short  term  high   turbidities,   sudden   unwanted  depositions,
smothering of  aquatic life, and unsuitable conditions for fish spawning.
Alternatively, low suspended solids releases can cause increased scouring
of stream  channels as the stream seeks an equilibrium of sediment load.

    Furthermore, sediment can  be  partially  or  completely  composed of
organic material.   The  organic material  can decompose by biotic action
and cause oxygen depletion in the water column  over the  sediment.  This
oxygen depletion is called sediment oxygen demand.  It can be significant
in the balance of oxygen within reservoirs.  The organic  material in the
sediment can  come from point or nonpoint sources, organic growths in the
inflowing stream or  from  the  organic  processes  within  the reservoir
itself.

    Sediment changes  do not  always have  to occur.   If  a reservoir is
operated to convey sediment  density currents  through the  reservoir, in
time  an  equilibrium  can  be  achieved  where the inflow and outflow of
suspended sediment are equal.

Flow Regulation.

    Dams typically cause modified flow conditions when operated for water
supply,  recreation,  hydroelectric  power,  or  other  uses.  The use of
reservoirs to  regulate streamflow  can have  a positive  effect on water
quality.   If the  dam is  operated such  that low flows are augmented, a
stream's assimilative capacity can be  enhanced  and the  concentration of
pollutants  already   present  downstream   can  decrease  (provided  the
reservoir water has lower pollutant levels).    When  dams  are  used for
flood  protection,   extremely  high  flows are avoided, as are associated
suspended sediment load problems and other serious water quality problems
related to flood water.

    If, however,  the dam  is operated such that it produces a lower than
normal  low  flow,   downstream   assimilative  capacity   for  downstream
discharges may be reduced.  A lower than normal  low flow can also greatly
affect aquatic  habitats  by  increasing  water  temperatures, decreasing

                                   II-7

-------
surface area,  depth of riffles  and pools, and stream width.  There is much
less  habitat,  reduced  food-chain  organisms,  reduced  fish  nursery  and
spawning  acreage,   and fish  are  more  exposed  to  predators  and  more
susceptible to disease  (Schwiebert, 1984).  Tailwaters without minimum flow
discharges greatly reduces aquatic insect production since major shoal and
riffle habitat areas  are  exposed  (Pfitzer, 1974).   A  higher  than normal
high flow can  create a  severe scour and bank erosion problem as well as the
possibility of flooding.    High  flows can  produce  velocities  that  some
aquatic  biota cannot  tolerate  unless  some  "slack  water"  habitat  is
available.  Flow regulation can sometimes  improve the  composition of the
aquatic community.   It  has been suggested that the retarding of storm flows
is a primary reason for the much larger  benthic populations  and improved
species  diversity  found   downstream   of   southern  SCS  flood  retention
impoundments (SCS,  1979).   For intermittent  streams,  the longer duration
of flow by the release of  stored flood  flow may cause a benthic population
improvement (SCS,  1979).

     Impoundments   also can have  a chemical  stabilizing  effect on  the
receiving  streams   because  the impoundments  reduce  the inflowing  peak
concentrations.  Chemical  concentrations would  fluctuate more erratically
in the  inflowing  stream  than  in the  receiving stream  (SCS,  1979).   One
positive  use  of dams  that has  been   proposed  for  the Yakima  River  in
Washington is  increasing  the upstream  storage of a reservoir for fish flow
enhancement.  It  is predicted that some 340 miles of spawning, rearing and
resting areas  for steelhead and salmon in  the  Yakima  River  System can be
improved by this proposal  (Dompier and Woodworth,  1980).

Reaeration Denial.

     Dams slow waters down, decrease turbulence and  thus decrease natural
transfer of oxygen from the  air to the  water by  reaeration.  At a non-power
dam with  a  spillway,  the rapid flow  of  the water over the  spillway and
subsequent tail water  turbulence, promote  reaeration  of the  tail waters.
In power  impoundments, water reaches  the release point  by transport in a
closed conduit having given up  some of its  kinetic energy to the turbines.
Reaeration  under  this  condition  partially  depends  on  the nature of the
point of  release,  with submerged releases providing less  aeration than
free-falling releases. The retrofitting  of existing unused mill ponds and
impoundments with  add-on low head small hydropower turbines is a particular
example of where this effect may be noticeable.

Fish Entrainment.

     Fish entrainment  is  the capture  and passage of fish through turbine
machinery during power generation operations.  In addition to the reduction
of fishery  resources of the reservoir  system,  the discharge  of dead fish
and  their remains  can cause  water  quality problems   from  an  aesthetic
viewpoint.  If discharged in significant quantities, the dissolved oxygen
demands of their decomposition may depress available  oxygen.  Because there
has been much  recent interest  in this  issue, fish entrainment is mentioned
in this report even though  it  is not  a water quality  issue  per se.

                                   II-8

-------
Toxics Accumulation.

     Sediments trapped  behind dams can be contaminated with toxic metals
and/or  organics.    Normally,  these  toxic-bearing  sediments  are  not
transported downstream  unless the sediments are disturbed as a result of
dredging, dam removal, or  dam failure.   An  example of  this phenomenon
occurred  in  the  Hudson  River  where  large amounts of polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) were transported downstream when the Fort Edward Dam was
removed  in  1973  (Carcich  and  Tofflemire,  1982).  Analysis of toxics
accumulation  behind  dams  was  not  included  in  this  report  due  to
insufficient data on a national level.
                                II-9

-------
                            III.   EPA ANALYSES
OBJECTIVES

      The previous chapter describes the generic effects that are possible.
The objective of  this chapter is  to  make quantitative estimates  of the
national scope of the effects that dams have upon water quality.

      This chapter summarizes the methodology for estimating the scope of
effects.   Despite  the  fact that  a  statistically  valid,  quantitative
approach  is  used, the  estimates  presented are  highly qualified  due  to
limitations  in   data  availability.    These  estimates  are  based  upon
publications, written by experts in this topic, and upon monitoring data,
contained  within  the  EPA  STORET  water  quality data  repository.   Two
parallel paths are followed.  What  current publications  are enlightening
about the scope  of water quality effects of dams?  What can be inferred by
examination of a random sample of the population of all 68,155 dams?

      The objective is to make the estimation as simple,  straightforward,
and accurate as possible.   The  goal is to communicate  the  essential and
basic   aspects   of   dam  water   quality  effects  to   nonspecialists.
Qualifications are made throughout about  the  preliminary nature  of the
quantification.

      Given the  overall  goal  of quantification,  a number of conditions are
imposed upon its achievement:

            No new field data are  involved in  the  analyses,  although new
            data would further reduce uncertainty.

            The  findings are to  be unbiased and scientifically sound.

            Results are to  be reproducible.

            Assumptions and limitations are to be stated.
      The  organization  of  this  chapter  is  directed  at  answering  the
following questions.

            How many dams of various types are there?

            Where are the dams?
                                   III-l

-------
         What elementary   theories  and  models  can  be  utilized,  given  the
         information  at hand,  to  assist   the  reader   to   understand some
         basic aspects  of dam behavior?  Note that the  appeal  of simple
         models is  to provide  generalities  for  problem identification  and
         enlightenment and  not to   solve site-specific problems.   Models
         appropriate  for  site-specific  problems  tend to  be   much more
         complicated  and   out  of  reach of the available resources  of this
         report.
                                                                 possibly


         What is the extent of the  tailwater  dissolved  oxygen  effect?
How many impoundments have the potential  to  stratify,
facilitating water quality problems?
         How many  dams alter   water
         the impoundment?
                            quality as streamflow passes through
         What is  the  extent  of
         requirement for imminent,
                          phosphorus  enrichment,   which  is one
                          ongoing,  or advanced eutrophication?
    The first  three questions  are addressed  in  the following section on
"Preliminaries" or in Appendix  C "Analysis Supplement."    The last four
questions  are  addressed  in  four  subsequent  sections  of this chapter
titled  "Mixing  Analysis,"  "Dissolved   Oxygen    in   Dam  Tailwaters,"
"Upstream/Downstream  Comparison   of  Water  Quality,"   and  "Phosphorus
Enrichment Analysis" respectively.   For each  of  these  latter questions,
an attempt is made to identify any correlation between dam type and water
quality.  The mixing analysis and tailwater DO analysis  are related since
a  poorly  mixed  (stratified)  reservoir  is   much  more   likely to have
tailwater DO problems.
PRELIMINARIES
    This section presents a logical   and
reader in  following the  various analyses.
their associated data are discussed.
and  the
modeling
qualified
associated
                                 strategic  context  to
                                     The  population of
                                                                  aid the
                                                                 dams and
                                      Ancillary data,  not in the Corps of
Engineers'   data  base,   but  added  to random samples to fill  in missing
data, are also discussed.   The general  approach to sampling  is presented
          topic  of  appropriate  sample  size  is addressed.   Elementary
          tools,  which   are  used  in   the  chapter,   are  discussed and
           in   Appendix  C,  as  is  the  significance  of  correlations
           with various  sized samples.
                                 III-2

-------
The Population and Associated Data.

    The Corps  of Engineers'   data base  includes 68,155 dams built up to
the year 1980.  This data base includes the following basic data:

         Coordinates:  latitude and  longitude; this  allows a particular
         dam  to  be  isolated  and  ancillary  data,  such  as for water
         quality, obtained.

         V = volume of normal pool (acre*feet).

         H = hydraulic height of dam (feet).

         Q = flow capacity of the spillway to pass floodwaters (cfs).

         Installed hydropower of 100 kilowatts (kW)  or more  (100s of kW
         if known).

         Other identifiers:   Corps  of Engineers assigned number, state,
         name, uses such as power, flood control, etc.

    The  limitations  of  the  Corps  of  Engineers  data  base  are  the
following:

         There is no information on water quality

         Dams built since about 1980 are not included.

         Dams with  less than 100 kW of power generation capacity are not
         labeled; there are numerous small hydroelectric  projects in the
         United States.

         Small  impoundments  with  volumes  less  than  50 acre*feet and
         having dams less than 25 feet high are excluded.

         The  data  base  has  no  information  on  outlet  level.   Such
         information would  be difficult to develop for the large numbers
         of dams in the United States.

    To get numerical perspective on this population of dams, there are:

         68,155 dams overall.

         1,091 dams that are  known to  have more  than 100  kilowatts of
         installed power.

         301  dams  that  have  more  than 30 megawatts (MW) of installed
         power.

         2,125 "large" dams with over 10,000 acre«feet of  storage at the
         normal pool  elevation.   Of these,  424 have  100 kW or more of
         installed power, and 1,701 have no installed power.

         66,030 "small" dams with less than 10,000 acre-feet of storage.

                                  III-3

-------
    The dam  inventory is  partitioned,  as  to potential  for incidence of
water quality effects,  using  the  knowledge  contained   in  the generic
effect  descriptions  and  recommendations  to the authors of this report
from TVA experts:
         Large dams
         tend  to
         nutrients.
have potential
stratify  and
for significant
have  sufficient
effects because they
 detention  to  trap
         Dams  with  low-level   outlets  transmit  water  quality effects
         downstream associated  with the hypolimnetic impoundment layer.
         It should be noted that power dams are most likely  to have low-
         level  outlets.    Large  nonpower  dams may also have low-level
         outlets.  Small dams are much less likely to have  such outlets.

    With this  logic to support the partitioning, the Corps of Engineers'
Dam listing is divided into three parts based on the  criteria summarized
in Table III-l.  The partitioning is intended to focus resources on those
subsets of the dam  inventory wherein  significant water  quality effects
are most likely.  The geographic distributions of the three types of dams
are depicted in Figures III-l,  2, and 3.
                  Table III-l.  Partitioning Criteria.

          Type                 Criteria
                                        Number
   Large Power Dams
   Large Nonpower Dams
   Smal1 Dams
     Over 10,000 acre-feet and over        424
     100 kW of installed power.

     Over 10,000 acre-feet and having    1,701
     no installed power.

     All dams under 10,000 acre-feet    66,030
     (including 667 that have power).
Sampling.

    The general approach is  to conduct  a random  sample of  each of the
partitioned data  sets of  dams in the Corps of Engineers data base.  The
sample is then utilized to determine some or all of the properties of the
partitioned  populations.    For  practical  reasons of time and manpower
constraints, it was decided that a sample size of 40 dams in  each of the
three partitioned  data sets  would suffice.   The principal reason for a
combined sample of 3 x 40 = 120  dams, is  a large  effort requirement to
secure ancillary data for each dam.

    Once a  random dam  is identified,  ancillary data are sought.  These
ancillary data elements include:   impoundment  surface  area,  length of
impoundment  along  the  flow  axis,  and  average  annual inflow.  These
geometric data  are secured  from USGS  topographic maps  and EPA's River
                                  III-4

-------
  Population of Large Power Dams
          Figure III-l
Population of Large Non-Power Dams
          Figure III-2
   Population of Small Dams
          Figure III-3
               III-5

-------
Reach File.   Also sought as ancillary data are water quality data above,
within, and below the impoundment associated with the  dam.    These water
quality data are obtained from EPA's STORE! data repository  using methods
described in detail  later in this chapter.

    The partitioned  random sample  of dams  is presented  in Appendix B.
Within this appendix are dam data taken from the Corps of Engineers' data
base and ancillary data.  Some,  or all,  of the  following  data elements
are presented:   identification  number, name,   installed power capacity,
volume, hydraulic height, spillway  capacity,  latitude,   longitude, mean
inflow,  area,   length,  Froude   number,   retention  coefficient,  mean
phosphorus concentrations, and identification  of  dams  having ancillary
water quality  data.   (The Froude  number  and   retention coefficient are
explained later in this report.)

Obtaining Sample Dams

    The sample of dams to be  considered is  randomly drawn   from records
contained in  the 68,155-dam data base of the Corps of Engineers National
Inventory of Dams.  The various  mathematical and  statistical procedures
are performed  using the  Statistical Analysis  System (SAS), a commercial
statistical software package (SAS Institute, 1982).

    The dam population records are placed in a  data base  where analytical
and statistical  operations are  performed.   In all, 68,155 records were
placed into the data base.  The data  base  is  sorted into  the three dam
categories: large  power, large  nonpower,  and  small dams.  Each of these
three categories represents a specific population.  A  random sample from
each of  these populations  is developed using  a SAS uniform distribution
random number generating function.  The  SAS random  numbers are  used to
select 40  random dams from each sub-population for a total  of 120 random
dams.   A list  of the  random sample  dams appears  in Appendix  B.  The
sample  is  partitioned  to  allow sufficient representation of the large
power, large nonpower, and  small dams.   However,  since the populations
are  of  different  sizes,  the confidence bounds surrounding each sample
vary.

Other Logical Checks and Data Sources

    The sample size of 40, relative  to  its  adequacy  to  represent the
partitional data  sets of  dams, is discussed in Appendix C.  It is shown
that the theoretic confidence intervals are rather large, indicating that
larger samplings are desirable to further define water quality attributes
of dams.

    After selection of each 40 dam random sample set, various  checks are
performed  to  confirm  the  representative  nature  of  the sample.  The
geographic distribution is checked and the sample frequency functions are
compared to the population frequency functions.  The hypothesis is tested
so that the sample and population are from the same  distribution with 95
percent certainty.  These checks are presented in Appendix C.
                                 III-6

-------
      The Corps  of Engineers  dam data  contained  in the  data base  and
associated with  the  random sample dams  are supplemented with  ancillary
data.  These data are:

            Estimates of pool  area, impoundment length, and average inflow
            using equations found in  Appendix C.

            Water quality data at  upstream,  pool, and downstream sites (as
            described in a subsequent section).

      In addition to  the random dams,  information on other dams studied by
the Oak Ridge National  Laboratory, TVA,  and the  CE  are  incorporated into
this chapter.
MIXING ANALYSIS

      The mixing  analysis  is  the first of four major  analytical  efforts
undertaken for  this  report.   An approach is developed to  categorize the
stratification potential (indicative of  little mixing) in  the population
of impoundments.   This analysis is based  on  the  Froude number which is
suggestive of stratification.   The potential  for stratification should be
investigated as  an  indication of poor mixing which, when  accompanied by
large  oxygen  demands,  may result  in  low dissolved  oxygen  content and
accompanying water quality problems in bottom waters.  The potential for
dissolved oxygen problems is estimated in two analyses (the Froude number
analysis and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory analysis).

Relationship of Froude Number  to Mixing.

      According  to TVA,  the potential  for cold,  deoxygenated hydropower
releases from the hypolimnion  of a  reservoir is due largely to the effects
of  thermal  stratification   (TVA,   1987a).     The  degree   of   thermal
stratification depends on hydrologic and morphologic characteristics that
vary  significantly  across  TVA  reservoirs.   Many  strategies  for  release
improvement either influence or are influenced by  thermal  stratification.
When  such  strategies  are under   consideration  for  a  wide  range  of
reservoirs, it is useful  to have a  system whereby reservoirs can be ranked
according to their stratification potential.

      Thermal   stratification  insulates  the   reservoir  hypolimnion  from
warming, inhibits mixing with  the epilimnion,  and  sharply  reduces  natural
reaeration of the hypolimnion.  Without replenishment from the .surface or
tributary  inflow,  hypolimnetic  oxygen  can  be   depleted   by   organic
decomposition and by respiration of aquatic plants.   The  effects  of other
important variables such as reservoir operations and inflowing organic and
nutrient loads  are highly coupled with thermal stratification in producing
the ultimate water quality of the releases.  In fact, these other variables
can interact to produce significant vertical  oxyclines (oxygen gradients)
in  the   hypolimnion   even   in   the   absence  of   significant   thermal
stratification.    In  the  southeastern  United  States   strong   thermal
stratification  generally produces a  strong ovycline.  Therefore, when used
in combination with measures  of  other  important variables,  some  index of
stratification  potential can  be  useful for ranking  the potential  for low
DO, as well  as  cold temperatures in low-level  releases.  In this sense, the
subsequent DO tailwater analysis and this analysis each support the other.

                              III-7

-------
            The densimetric Froude number represents the ratio of inertia! forces
        imposed by the  longitudinal  flow  to  gravitational  forces  within the
        stratified impoundment;  it is therefore a measure of the degree to which
        flow can alter the internal density  structure of  the reservoir.   Small
        Froude  numbers  (less  than  about  0.3)  indicate strong stratification
        potential, while larger  Froude  numbers  indicate  weak  or intermittent
        stratification, progressing to completely mixed conditions for very large
        Froude  numbers  (TVA,  1987a).    Furthermore,  the  Froude  number  can
        distinguish  the  greater  stratification  potential  of  a  short,  deep
        reservoir as compared to a long, shallow reservoir,  even though  the two
        reservoirs  may  have  the  same  flow  to  volume  ratio.   For example,
        comparing reservoir flow to volume ratios and Froude numbers for Cherokee
        and  Fontana  Reservoirs,  within  TVA,  indicates  similar  mean  annual
        flushing rates,  yet considerable  difference in  Froude number resulting
        from morphological differences.

            The data in Figure III-4 represent a summer drought condition wherein
        inflows are low and hydraulic mixing potential is also low;  however, the
        reservoirs with lower Froude numbers are also reservoirs with high top to
        bottom temperature differences.    Figure  III-4  shows  average vertical
        temperature  differential  (surface  to  bottom) in TVA reservoirs at the
        peak of the 1986 drought versus the densimetric Froude number.
                                                           TVA |987; Fiq. XII-1)
              Median Temp.
              Difference
Ol
                          i.ae«-eei         i.ee*+eee         i.ee.+eei
                                  Densimetric Froude Number
                                                                             i.ee«+ees
                                      Figure III-4
                     Stratification versus Densimetric Froude Number
                                   for TVA Reservoirs.

                                         III-8

-------
    For these  reservoirs under  these conditions, the densimetric Froude
number is a significant index of stratification potential.   The square of
the correlation coefficient, R^, which equals the percentage of explained
variation, is 69 percent for this sample size of 22  TVA reservoirs under
summer drought  conditions.  In other words, the variation  in temperature
differential  between the top and bottom  layers of  TVA reservoirs  is 69
percent explained  by a  linear relationship.  TVA has suggested use of a
seasonal  Froude number (e.g., using only  summer flows,  volumes, depths,
etc.)  to  improve  the  correlation,  in  lieu  of annual  average Froude
numbers that were used  to develop  Figure III-4.   Also  shown in Figure
III-4 is  the F  = 0.3 demarcation line between strong stratification and
weak to intermittent stratification  to mixed  conditions.    The vertical
line defined  by F  = 0.3  and the  horizontal line defined by the median
temperature difference divide the 22 dams  into two  shaded subsets shown
on Figure III-4.  Eighteen of the twenty-two dams fall in the subsets.  F
= 0.3 provides a reasonable demarcation.  Also there is a cluster of dams
(6)  around   F  =  10  that  show  the  least  temperature  differential
substantiating that there is less tendency to stratify  (more tendency to
mix) at high F values.

Findings.

    The  national  Froude  number  cumulative frequencies are utilized to
make national estimates of mixing potential based on F = 0.3.  The Froude
number does  not describe a condition of water quality - it does indicate
the  tendency  of  a  reservoir  to  thermally  stratify.    A  thermally
stratified  reservoir  is  a  poorly  mixed  reservoir.    A poorly mixed
reservoir may have poor quality in the hypolimnion.   If  a reservoir has
low-level  outlets  and  poor  quality  water  in  the  hypolimnion,  the
tailwaters may have poor  quality.    Poor,  in  this  context, generally
refers to low dissolved oxygen and the presence of iron and manganese.

    The  Froude  number  frequencies  are  estimated using  the elementary
model,  F  =  K  (L/D)(q/V),  where  K  depends  upon  units   and  F  is
dimensionless.   A threshold  for theoretic  flow separation is F = 1/n =
0.3.  This theoretic  value  agrees  with  the  suggested  TVA threshold.
Above this level, there is a tendency to mix.  At much less than 0.3, the
tendency to stratify is strong.

    The mixing tendency classification  scheme  enables  determination of
dam population percentages shown in Table III-2.  Data for  small dams are
presented in Appendix  E.    Impoundments  that  are  strongly  .mixed are
unlikely  to  have  as  severe  tailwater  quality  effects as stratified
impoundments, provided  other important  factors such  as inflow loadings
and  sediment  oxygen  demands  are  roughly  equal.  Strongly stratified
impoundments may have water  quality  effects  which  may  be transmitted
downstream by  low-level outlets.  Without field inspections or some type
of intensive polling,  the  incidence  of  such  outlets  is problematic.
However,   low-level  outlets  are  more  typical with power dams, but may
occur in any dam.
                                 III-9

-------
                     Table III-2.
 National  Potential  Mixing Percentages for Large Dams.
Mixing Tendency
Potentially Strongly Stratified
F < 0.3
Potentially Weakly or Inter-
mittently Stratified or
Completely Mixed.
F > 0.3
Missing Data
TOTALS
Power
171
217
36
424
Nonpower
(40%) 631 (37%)
(51%) 742 (44%)
(9%) 328 (19%)
1,701
 The F  estimates utilized  a large amount of large and
some small   dam data  to generate  values for  L,  D, q;
however the  linear estimators  are forced through zero
to enable  small  dam  extrapolations of  F.   Therefore,
the   small    dam   tallies    of   potential    strong
stratification may not be as  valid  as  the  large dam
tallies; these small dam tallies appear in Appendix E.
                        111-10

-------
DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAN TAILWATERS

      The  second  of  four major  analytical  efforts  undertaken  is  an
evaluation of  dissolved oxygen concentrations  in the  tailwaters  below
impoundments.   In  particular,  this effort  reviews  a study by  ORNL and
provides  analogous  results for the  random sample  and case  study  data
collected  for  this report.    Unlike  the mixing  analysis, this  effort
identifies dissolved oxygen problems  as defined by  the exceedance  of a
specific numerical  criterion.

Oak Ridge National  Laboratory Study.

      The U.S.  Department of Energy has supported a Small-Scale Hydropower
Development  Program.    Under  this  program,  the Oak Ridge  Laboratory
conducted a water quality study of hydropower dam tailwaters (Cada, et al.
1983).   The  objective  of  the study  is to estimate the   extent  of the
problem of DO in tailwaters for small-scale  hydropower development.  This
is analyzed by  pairing operating hydroelectric  sites with dissolved oxygen
measurements from nearby downstream U.S. Geological  Survey water quality
stations.  These data are used to calculate probabilities of noncompliance
(PNCs), that is, the probabilities that dissolved oxygen  concentrations
in the discharge waters of operating  hydroelectric  dams will  drop below
5 mg/1.   Incorporated within this study are several  technical  judgments:

            A  probability  of noncompliance   (PNC)   is  chosen  as  the
            statistic  of   interest  because  it directly   addresses  the
            question  "What are  the  chances   that   discharges  below  a
            hydroelectric  dam  will  violate dissolved  oxygen  criteria?"
            PNC is  defined as the probability that  concentrations  of
            dissolved oxygen will  be less than some specified value.

            Because thermal stratification and resultant oxygen depletion
            are seasonal phenomena,  two probabilities are  calculated for
            each  site:    one for  the summer  months  (July,  August,
            September,  and October); and another for  the remaining months,
            defined as winter months.

            The EPA criterion  of a minimum dissolved  oxygen concentration
            of  5.0  mg/1  is utilized  to assess the  potential  for water
            quality  problems  at  small-scale   hydroelectric  projects
            (defined by the U.S. Department of  Energy (DOE)  as-having a
            potential  capacity of 30 MW or less).

            The data   base for  the   U.S.  Corps  of  Engineers  National
            Hydropower Study is used,  containing 15,300 existing dams.

            Dissolved oxygen  data  are acquired from the  National  Water
            Data Storage and  Retrieval  System  (WATSTORE),  maintained  by
            U.S. Geological Survey.   By cooperative arrangements,  these
            data are a large subset of EPA's STORET data base.
                               III-ll

-------
         Selection of  operating hydroelectric dams used in this study is
         based on the existence of appropriate water quality  data in the
         USGS  data  base.     A  water  quality  monitoring  station  was
         considered appropriate if it  (1)  was  downstream from  the dam,
         (2) was  within 4.8  km (3  miles) of  the dam, and (3) had more
         than two measurements of  dissolved  oxygen  concentration.   No
         random sampling is included in the Oak Ridge study.

    Of the 15,300 potential dams, 65 small-scale hydroelectric sites were
selected for determination  of PNCs.  The study  showed effects associated
with season,  geography, and  whether or  not the facility had greater or
less than 30 MW of capacity.  The PNCs tend to be  higher in  the summer,
east of the Mississippi, and for facilities with greater than 30 MW.

Findings.

     The method  of analysis  used in  the  Oak  Ridge Study is applied in
this study.  The purpose is to determine if the methods and procedures of
this study  can reproduce the Oak Ridge results and, if so, to strengthen
their  previous  findings.     A  summary  in  Table  III-3  presents  the
comparison of the PNCs for  the Oak Ridge Study and for this study.

    The  Oak  Ridge  PNCs  are  based  on  139  power dams.  Figure III-5
presents a geographical breakdown of the regions for the Oak Ridge study.
Table III-3
power dams
(Some sites
winter data.
power dams
data, which
Oak  Ridge
             summarizes the  ORNL data  as well   as data available for 23
            from the  large power  sample of  dams and  the case studies.
             in both  the ORNL  and EPA  analyses lacked either summer or
            )  The individual  PNCs are presented in Appendix  B for these
            as well   as for  the nonpower dams.   The STORET water quality
            includes WATSTORE records, produce results comparable  to the
            Study.    A  significant  finding  is the confirmation of the
seasonality of PNC levels and their  relative magnitudes  reported in the
Oak Ridge Study.  From the perspective of where  and when dissolved oxygen
levels are below EPA criteria, the combined PNC  results indicate:
         PNCs vary regionally, seasonally,
         facilities.
                                            and with  size for generating
         In  the  Ohio  Valley  and  the Southeast
         probability of low DO  -  0.31  to  0.56.
         highest in summer months.
                                                   there is a significant
                                                      The  probability is
    The next  section makes  dissolved oxygen comparisons of annual means
to establish differences above  and below  dams.   The use  of the annual
mean  tends  to  reduce  the  ability  to detect significant differences.
Thus, the findings associated with mean annual effects should tend  to be
conservative.   For example,  if 10 percent of a sample shows significant
difference on a mean annual comparison, the PNC seasonal results lead one
to  the  conclusion  that  the  seasonal  effect  will  be larger than 10
percent.
                                 111-12

-------
 D NE
O Great Basin
§ Lake States
D  Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Great Dlains
                             Figure III-5.
                Geographical Breakdown of Regions for
              the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Study.
                              111-13

-------
                    Table  III-3.
        Probabilities  of Non-Compliance with
       5 mg/1 Dissolved Oxygen for  Power Dams.

Summer Season
Location
Great Basin
Great Plains
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
(n) Mean
Summer Season
Great Basin
Great Plains
Hawaii
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
(n) Mean
Winter Season
Great Basin
Great Plains
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
(n) Mean
Winter Season
Great Basin
Great Plains
Hawaii
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
(n) Mean
Oak Ridge
National Lab

n
3
6
-
3
16
19
6
18
(71)

3
1
1
5
15
3
7
9
17
(61)

3
6
-
3
18
19
6
18
(73)

3
2
1
6
16
3
6
9
18
(64)
Capacity >
PNC
0.004
0.182
-
0.144
0.404
0.039
0.052
0.308
0.162
Capacity <
0.373
0.000
0.000
0.043
0.066
0.111
0.003
0.027
0.131
0.084
Capacity >
0.000
0.008
-
0.005
0.096
0.000
0.000
0.039
0.021
Capacity <
0.0274,{
0.508
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.007
This
30 MW
n
_
-
-
-
5
4
2
2
(13)
30 MW
-
1
-
4
-
3
2
(10)
30 W
-
-
-
-
5
4
2
1
(12)
30 MW
1
-
3
-
3
2
(9)
Study

PNC
_
-
-
-
0.560
0.053
0.000
0.170
0.196

_
0.000
-
0.123
-
0.220
0.190
0.137

-
-
-
-
0.102
0.015
0.000
0.080
0.049

0.000
-
0.003
-
0.073
0.005
0.020
Presumed outlier.
                        111-14

-------
    The Corps  of Engineers  has also performed an analysis of tail waters
for low dissolved  oxygen  (Kennedy  and  Gaugush,  1987).     Their study
examined 73  Corps of  Engineers hydropower  projects concentrated in the
pacific northwest and southeastern regions  of  the  U.S.     As  shown in
Figure  III-6,  low  DO  tailwaters  are more frequently a problem in the
southeast.    This  figure  is  the  result  of  a  Corps    of  Engineers
questionnaire.    A  similar  approach  is  presented  in  Chapter VI; the
Chapter VI  presentation  extends  and  broadens  the  Corps  of Engineer
questionnaire approach to include TVA and Bureau of Reclamation projects.
                                                •  Severe DO Problems

                                                o  Minor DO Problems

                                                A  No DO Problems
        Figure III-6.   Distribution of 73 Hydropower Projects and
    Their Tailwater Conditions.   (Source:  Kennedy and Gaugush,  1987)
                                 111-15

-------
UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY

    This  section  presents  the  third  of four major analytical  efforts
comprising this chapter.   Water quality data retrieved  from EPA's STORET
data base  upstream and downstream of impoundments were collected  and are
compared.  Changes in  water quality  observed as  the result  of  passing
through the  impoundment are  reported.  The analysis is attempted on the
random sample for a number of water quality parameters.

Acquiring Water Quality Data.

    The water quality data acquisition  phase  of  this  analysis   is the
collection  of  ancillary  water  quality  monitoring  data for the sites
randomly selected from the population.   The definition  of the  dam site
requires the manual study of USGS and hydrological unit maps to determine
the scope of the  reaches  to  be  studied.    Reaches  within  the pool,
upstream of  the pool,  and downstream  of the  pool  are determined.  The
data search  could reach  out up  to 20  miles from  the dam,  but such a
distant search was infrequent.  Latitude and longitude are used to define
a "window" to be searched for water quality information.

    If major changes in  the  hydrography  occurred  within  these limits
(such as  another dam five miles upstream) the "windows" are made  smaller
to exclude extraneous,  downstream  backwater,  or  misleading  data. The
types of  water quality  and related  parameters retrieved for this study
are:  mean streamflow, dissolved oxygen,  phosphorus, nitrogen,turbidity,
water temperature,  iron, manganese, hydrogen sulfide, chlorophyll-a, and
BOD5.

    Retrieval of data from  STORET  requires  the  use  of  the latitude,
longitude polygon  and the  water quality  parameters.  The STORET system
retrieves water quality data inside  the  polygon  "window".    The water
quality data  include station  information (agency, location, name, depth
of sample) as  well  as  data  on  the  water  quality  parameters.   The
upstream, downstream,  and pool  retrievals are  placed into intermediate
data sets; which are combined into a unique  dam site  file.   SAS can be
used to  calculate the  number of records, the maximum, minimum, mean and
standard deviation values for each parameter in this  combined site file.
Information  in  Appendix  B  presents  the  incidence of ancillary water
quality data for each dam in the random sample.

    The arithmetic mean, standard deviation, maximum,  and minimum values
are calculated  for each parameter at each dam.  The resulting statistics
are then downloaded into  an  RBASE  data  base;  RBASE  is  a commercial
software package  that operates  on personal  computers.  Of the original
sample containing  120  impoundments   (40  large  power  [L-P];  40 large
nonpower [L-NP];  and 40  small [S]  dams), 65  impoundments (or 54%) had
data for one or more parameters (39 L-P,  21 L-NP,  5 S).   The  L-P dams
averaged 25  stations, L-NP  averaged 8  stations (with  the exception of
Lake Tahoe  with  301  stations),  and  small  dams  averaged  8 stations
reporting  data.    STORET  retrieval  summarizations  are  presented  in
Appendix C.

                                 111-16

-------
Limitations of the Water Quality Data.

      For many random sample dams, water  quality  data are not obtainable
with the  methods  described herein.   For such  dams,  then, an  effect is
either present or it is  not, and this  simple either/or provides a boundary
on the estimate.  In some  cases,  a very  large  number  of the  dams in the
random sample have no water quality data.

      Consider the  following example  of a hypothetical  effect  above and
below a sample of 40 dams:

            10 dams have significant effect
            18 dams have insignificant effect
            12 dams have no data
To estimate  the  upper bound of  the  number of dams  having  a significant
effect,  assume  all  dams  without  data  (12)  have  a  significant  effect,
therefore:

                        10 + 12
        Upper bound =  	=  55 percent
                          40

Conversely, a lower bound  can be  approximated  by assuming all dams without
data (12) have an insignificant effect as follows:

                           10
        Lower bound =     	  = 25 percent
                           40

Thus, one can assume for this hypothetical example that between 25 percent
and 55 percent of the dams exhibit a significant effect.

      The difference in means testing is based on all data available at a
site.  The tailwater analysis of dissolved oxygen  highlighted  the fact that
summer  dissolved  oxygen   depressions   are  more  prevalent  than  winter
depressions.  Therefore, there may be sites that  show no significance in
dissolved  oxygen  differences  by  annual  means  testing that  would  be
significant if summer data  alone were examined. This may  be true for other
parameters, particularly iron and manganese.

      A data limitation may be  the  fact  that many agencies enter data into
STORET.   Such data may  have  different levels  of  accuracy  and  quality
control.   The  probability  of noncompliance study conducted  herein gives
similar results  to the Oak Ridge  National  Laboratory.   Furthermore,  an
audit of  the agency  codes  that identify the STORET  contributors gave the
following agencies:  USGS,  TVA, several  Corps  of Engineers districts, EPA,
and  water  quality  state  agencies  in  Florida,   Michigan,  Wisconsin,
California, Pennsylvania,  and Iowa.  These agencies'  data  are  the data used
to support the tailwater dissolved oxygen work  discussed herein and provide
insight into typical sources of STORET monitoring data.

                                   111-17

-------
Statistical Comparison of Means.

    This  section  discusses  the  statistical  comparison of the means of
water quality samples collected above and  below the  dam.    Samples from
the pool are excluded except for the phosphorus analysis presented later.
The analysis applies statistical  significance  testing  to  the difference
of means assuming the difference is normal.

    There are three possible situations:

         The  difference  is  positive  and statistically significant; in
         this  case,  the  average  concentration  is  higher  below  the
         impoundment than above the impoundment.

         The  difference   is  positive  or  negative  and   statistically
         insignificant; for this case, there is no significant difference
         above and below the impoundment.

         The   difference   of   means   is  negative  and   statistically
         significant; in  this case,  the average  concentration is lower
         below the impoundment than above the impoundment.

    If there  is no change in water quality above and below the dams, the
expected distribution of differences^ would be  5% decrease, 90% the same,
and 5%  increase.  That is, if one explored a large sample  of dams having
no effect  on mean  water quality,  the distribution  would be 5%/90%/5%.
If, on  the other  hand, there  is a  difference, other percentages would
appear for the increase and decreasing categories - say 10% or 20%.

    The statistical approach is  straightforward.   The mean  of a sample
from any  distribution tends  to be  normal by  the Central  Limit Theorem.
The differences of two  means, in  this case,  the mean  upstream and the
mean downstream  water quality,  also tend  to  be normal because sums and
differences of normal variates are themselves  normal.   The variance, or
square of  the standard  error of  the mean  difference is the sum of the
variances associated with the individual means, each computed  with their
respective  sample  sizes  (Hoel,  1951).    With  this  information, the
hypotheses are that:

         the positive difference of means  is significant, or

         the negative difference of means  is significant.

    The hypotheses are accepted with 95 percent confidence  if a positive
difference  is  greater  than  1.65  times the standard error of the mean
difference or an absolute value of a negative difference is  greater than
the same product.
     •'•Applying a  95% confidence interval for a "one tailed" test on each
end of the distribution of the mean difference.

                               111-18

-------
Findings.

    There are  1701 large  nonpower dams  having over 10,000 acre-feet of
storage.  Twenty-five percent, or less, of the random samples of nonpower
dams  have  water  quality  data  both  upstream  and  downstream  of the
impoundment.  Tallies for those dams having water quality data  are found
in Appendix D.

    There are  66,030 "small"  dams having  less than 10,000 acre-feet of
normal pool volume comprising 96.8 percent of the population of  Corps of
Engineers dams.   Of  the 40  small random dams in the sample, only 5 had
some form of water quality data.  Therefore,  there is  very little water
quality   monitoring   evidence   to   indicate   the  effects  of  small
impoundments.  What monitoring results there are, as  well as descriptive
and site specific information on southeastern small dams are presented in
Appendix E.

    The large power dams have installed  power and  over 10,000 acre-feet
of storage.   The  results of comparing water quality means are presented
in Table III-4.  Over  half  the  random  sample  of  dams  have  data on
temperature,  dissolved  oxygen,  phosphorus,  and  TKN both upstream and
downstream of the impoundment.  Reasonable bounds can be stated  for most
of the parameters.
                              Table III-4.
                Upstream/Downstream Water Quality Changes
                          For Large Power Dams.



Parameter
Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved Oxygen*
Iron
Manganese
Phosphorus
TKN
Total Nitrogen
Dams
Lacking
Necessary
Data
11
11
11
23
30
16
17
31
Dams with Upstream and


Total Having
Data
29
29
29
17
10
24
23
9


Signif i
Increase
11
8
6
4
0
5
4
1
Downstream Data


cant
Decrease
5
9
9
3
1
12
10
2


Insignifi-
cant**
13
12
14
10
9
7
9
6
* nearest station to dam
** indicates no change in water quality
                               111-19

-------
    An impoundment can either increase or decrease tail water temperatures
depending upon the level  of the outlets.    Surface outlets  would release
warm  surface   waters  and   low-level   outlets   could  release  colder
hypolimnetic waters of stratified impoundments.     Of  the  sample  of 40
random large power dams,  between 27.5 percent and 55 percent increase the
annual average downstream temperature and  between  12.5  percent  and 40
percent  decrease  annual  average  downstream  temperatures.    For large
nonpower and small dams,  the data are too  limited to  provide reasonable
effect estimates.

    For  hypolimnetic  low-level  releases,   the  dissolved oxygen may be
lower than upstream with   corresponding  increases  in  soluble  iron and
manganese.   Of the  sample of  40 random  large power dams, between 22.5
percent and 50 percent show  significant   annual  decreases  in dissolved
oxygen.   This effect  is evidenced  in the  annual data;  the numbers of
significant  water  quality  changes  would  possibly  be  higher  for  a
comparison of seasonal means.
PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS

    This analysis  is oriented to determination of the extent of possible
nutrient enrichment of impoundments.   Over  enrichment can  lead to water
quality effects.   This  analysis is  the fourth of four major analytical
efforts undertaken for this report.   The  approach  is  to  estimate the
average phosphorus  concentration in  the pool.   Then, a simple tally is
made to determine  the  numbers  of  dams  having  average concentrations
exceeding  the  EPA  suggested  "Gold  Book" guidance value of 0.025 mg/1
(USEPA, 1986).  There  are several   points to  consider in  evaluation of
this method:

         The EPA guidance value is "suggested" and not a standard.

         Phosphorus enrichment  is only  an indication of eutrophication,
         although 50 to 90 percent  of  the  variation  of  other trophic
         state  measurements  are  predicted with water column phosphorus
         concentrations (Sobotka and Company, Inc., 1986).

         The approach  to "filling  in" missing  data uses Vollenweider's
         model discussed  in Appendix  C.   It is an elementary approach,
         but it works with the available  information and  is appropriate
         for screening.

         Phosphorus data  on large  power dams  are relatively plentiful,
         but not for other dams.   Thus,  the  results  pertain  to large
         power dams.   Data  gathered for  large nonpower  and small dams
         appear in Appendices D and E, respectively.
                                 111-20

-------
Relationship of Phosphorus Enrichment and Eutrophication.

      Ambient  phosphorus concentrations  do  not measure  eutrophication
although they do indicate a potential for eutrophication.  EPA recognized
that a number of specific exceptions  can occur which may reduce the threat
of phosphorus as a contributor to lake eutrophication:

            naturally  occurring  phenomena may  limit  the  development  of
            plant nuisances;

            technological or cost-effective  limitations  may help control
            introduced pollutants;

            waters may be highly  laden with  natural  silts  or colors that
            reduce   the   penetration  of   sunlight   needed   for  plant
            photosynthesis;

            waters may have  no history of plant  problems  due to various
            morphometric  features  such  as steep  banks,  great depth,  and
            substantial flows;

            in some waters, nutrients other  than phosphorus are limiting
            to plant growth; the level and nature of such limiting nutrient
            would not  be expected to  increase  to  an extent  that  would
            influence eutrophication; and

            in  some  waters, phosphorus  control  cannot be  sufficiently
            effective  under  present  technology  to  make  phosphorus  the
            limiting nutrient.

      A brief analysis was performed on the  nitrogen  and phosphorus data
to  confirm the  hypothesis  that  phosphorus  enrichment  is  a reasonable
screening  indicator  for  overall  potential impoundment  enrichment.   This
was  accomplished  by  examining  total   nitrogen  concentrations,  total
phosphorus  concentrations,  and the  N:P  ratio  for ten  sites  with  both
phosphorus and nitrogen data for the pool  as  shown in Table III-5.

      The  assessment  of  nitrogen  versus  phosphorus  limitation  is  often
performed using the N:P ratio (USEPA, 1985; USEPA, 1978b).   If this ratio
is  greater than  a  given value,  the water body  is  considered to  be
phosphorus limited.  The appropriate ratio is dependent on  the types  of
algae and  macrophyte growth  that  may occur and  usually  ranges between 7
and 15 (USEPA, 1985;  USEPA,  1978b).  Five of ten sites exhibit N:P ratios
greater than or equal  to 15,  and  seven of ten  sites  show  ratios greater
than or equal  to 7 suggesting phosphorus limiting conditions.
                                   111-21

-------
                               Table III-5
         Selected Summary of Nitrogen and Phosphorus  in  the  Pool
                     ("Yes"  implies enriched levels)

          Site      N:P Ratio    P > 0.025  mg/1*    N  > 0.375 mg/1**
AK00001
AR00174
CA00813
CA10162
GA03742
ID00223
KY03048
MN00653
PA00924
TN03702
32.
3.
4.
37.
7.
4.
16.
16.
43.
12.
No (0.01)
Yes (0.03)
Yes (0.22)
No (0.01)
Yes (0.08)
Yes (0.09)
Yes (0.06)
Yes (0.04)
Yes (0.08)
Yes (0.06)
No (0.32)
No (0.09)
Yes (0.84)
No (0.37)
Yes (0.59)
No (0.36)
Yes (0.95)
Yes (0.66)
Yes (3.46)
Yes (0.70)
         *   Phosphorus measurements may be made down  to 0.01 mg/1  using
             the single reagent method and 0.001 mg/1  using the automated
             colorimetric ascorbic acid reduction method (USEPA,  1974).

         **  A concentration of 0.375 mg/1 (as N) corresponds to  a
             balanced condition of nitrogen and phosphorus with
             phosphorus at the 0.025 mg/1  criterion level  using an  N:P
             ratio of 15:1.

    The phosphorus  data in  Table III-5 show that eight of ten sites are
labeled as "phosphorus enriched" based on the 0.025  mg/1  guidance  value,
yet only five to seven are -estimated to be phosphorus  limiting.  However,
the thrust of this  analysis is  to develop  an indicator  of enrichment.
Examination  of  the  corresponding  nitrogen  data  suggests  that  high
phosphorus  concentrations  may  indicate   enrichment  whether   or  not
phosphorus concentrations  are limiting.   For  example, the site CA00813
exhibits extremely  high nitrogen  as well  as phosphorus concentrations,
but an  N:P ratio  of only  4.   Therefore, the  indication of phosphorus
enrichment was suggestive of overall enrichment in spite of the fact that
phosphorus is not limiting.

    Furthermore, the  practical consideration  is how to achieve nutrient
reduction for situations that are enriched.  It  appears, based  on point
source  control,  that  phosphorus  reduction is much  less expensive than
nitrogen  reduction.    Thus,  it  is  economically  possible  to  make a
previously nitrogen  limiting situation  into a  phosphorus limiting case
and to achieve enrichment control.   In other  words,  phosphorus  is more
cost effective  to remove  than nitrogen.   It makes operational  sense to
judge enrichment with high phosphorus levels since it may be  feasible to
reduce them  and make  phosphorus either  become the (or become the more)
limiting nutrient.

    In sum, there are two sites  (AR00074 and  ID00223) of  the ten which
show enriched levels of phosphorus combined with lower levels of nitrogen
as defined in Table  III-5; and  the nitrogen  level for  site ID00223 is
only slightly  below the  specified nitrogen  threshold (0.36 mg/1  versus

                                 111-22

-------
0.375  mg/1).    Therefore,   these  data  support  the  use of phosphorus
enrichment as a key indicator of  eutrophication while  at the  same time
demonstrating  the  importance  of  qualifying  its  use as an indicator.
Note,   however,   that   since   these   data   are   not  statistically
representative, these data cannot be used to quantify error bounds.

    Nutrients in the water column and eutrophication are related and this
linkage is discussed in the  chapter  on generic  effects.   TVA evaluated
the trophic  status of  their reservoirs  (TVA, 1983).  They mention that
eutrophication, from the Greek word for "well fed," refers to progressive
fertilization  of  a  water   body  and  the changes in water quality that
result.  Natural eutrophication, over geologic time spans of thousands of
years, is  a normal  process of  aging.  During lake aging, plant biomass
accumulates until rooted aquatic plants cover the entire bottom of a lake
and the  basin fills  with organic  and inorganic  sediments.  Rivers and
man-made reservoirs with short retention times do not age in the same way
as lakes,  but added nutrients may increase their biological productivity
to levels traditionally identified as "eutrophic."

    TVA also recommends  that  "Evaluation  of  TVA  reservoirs  based on
trophic state  indices devised for classification of natural lakes should
be  avoided",  and  further    states  that   "Models  predicting  in-lake
phosphorus  concentrations  from  phosphorus  loads assuming steady state
conditions and continuous stirred tank reactor behavior are inappropriate
for the evaluation of most TVA reservoirs and should be avoided."

    However,  a  report  performed  under  contract  to  EPA (Sobotka and
Company, 1986) points out  the generally  acknowledged understanding that
"...ambient concentrations  of phosphorus  bear a  strong but not perfect
relationship   to   eutrophication    response...algal    growth,   water
transparency, DO  depletion, species  diversity, etc."  The report points
out  that  correlation  studies   of  cross-sectional   samples  of  more
sophisticated   trophic   state   measurements   and  ambient  phosphorus
concentration are  on  the  order  of  0.5  to  0.9.    This  indicates a
percentage of  explained variation, R2, of 25 percent to 81 percent.  The
same report then states the  operational conclusion:

         "In our view, this  smallish imperfection in the relation-
    ship between P concentration and ultimate water quality concerns
    is a reasonable price to pay in exchange for the advantages in
    implementability of an ambient P standard.  An ambient P
    standard is much easier  to translate into permit limits and
    other control decisions  than water quality standards expressed
    in other items — as narratives, as chlorophyll limits, or
    as trophic states."

    The 1986 EPA "Gold  Book" on  quality criteria  for water  presents a
rationale to  support guidance  for ambient  phosphorus.   To prevent the
development  of  biological   nuisances  and  to  control  accelerated  or
cultural eutrophication,  a  suggested phosphorus guidance value for lakes
and reservoirs is published   by EPA  at 0.025  mg/1.   Thus, the simplest
model or  approach is to use 0.025 mg/1 as a threshold level.  If ambient

                                 111-23

-------
phosphorus exceeds  0.025 eutrophication  is suspected, and, in fact, EPA
is considering  "control" and  regulatory options  to cut  levels back as
evidenced by  their "Gold  Book" suggestions.  From a pragmatic screening
standpoint, one can assign  measured  or  predicted  reservoir phosphorus
concentrations  of  greater  than  0.025  to indicate either potential or
actual eutrophic condition.

TVA and CE Results.

    There are reservations about using the Vollenweider model, or similar
models, for  control decisions.  However, it is instructive to review TVA
trophic status data (TVA, 1987a)  for  several   TVA  tributary reservoirs
reproduced in  Table III-6.   The  Vollenweider predictions calculated by
TVA are based on a Vs = 10 meters/year, apparent settling velocity.   The
uncorrected  Vollenweider  model  used  by  TVA  uniformly  overestimates
phosphorus cncentrations.   A  corrected model   is discussed  in the next
section.

    The square  of the  correlation coefficient, R2, of these 11 samples,
between Vollenweider prediction and measurement, is 44 percent.   This is
a significant  R2, but  probably not  strong enough to make site specific
decisions.  However,  R2 is sufficient to provide credibility to the next
section of this chapter.
                             Table III-6.
                        TVA Trophic Status Data.

                              Phosphorus Concentration (mg/1)
Site
Blue Ridge
Boone
Chatuga
Cherokee
Douglas
Fontana
Hiawassee
Norris
South Holston
Tims Ford
Watauga
Vollenweider
.015
.063
.017
.148
.062
.061
.022
.032
.029
.017
.044
Measured
.007
.022
.009
.021
.024
.008
.010
.007
.008
.009
.006
    Kennedy and Gaugush (1987) also report data for phosphorus, nitrogen,
and  chlorophyll-a  taken  from  STORET  for  47  southeastern  Corps  of
Engineers reservoirs  and the  same parameters  for 299 reservoirs Corps-
wide taken from Walker (1981).  These data for the growing season (April-
September) in  the mixed  layer (0-3 meters) are reproduced in Table III-
7.   Kennedy  and  Gaugush  concluded  that  southeastern  reservoirs are
                                  111-24

-------
typical of Corps reservoirs in terms of phosphorus and chlorophyll-a, but
much different  with respect  to nitrogen.   Kennedy  and Gaugush suggest
that reservoirs  in the  southeast may  experience nitrogen limitation of
primary production.

                               Table III-7
      Summary Statistics for Total Phosphorus, Total Nitrogen, and
       Chlorophyll-a in the Mixed Layer (0-3 m) During the Growing
                    Season (April through September).
Variable                   Mean                         Mean
(mg/1)        (47 Southeastern Reservoirs)   (299 Corps-wide Reservoirs)*
TP
TN
CHL-a
0.044
0.372
0.0093
0.048
1.00
0.0093
*   "Corps-wide" refers to a Corps reservoir data set described in
    Walker (1981).
Phosphorus Retention Regression Model.

    Of the 80 dams in the random sample with 10,000 acre*feet or more, 22
have average phosphorus data for inflows and pool concentrations that are
used in a correlation analysis.   Small dam  sites were  excluded because
none of  the sample  had upstream and pool  phosphorus data.  The analysis
proceeds through the following steps:

         The inflow phosphorus is utilized with the Vollenweider model to
         make a prediction of pool  concentrations.  The apparent settling
         velocity, Vs = 10 meters/year, is utilized.

         The 22 predictions are compared to the 22 observations.

         The observed values are analyzed in  a least  squares regression
         analysis  as  a  linear  function of the Vollenweider calculated
         values.  The line is constrained to pass through the origin.

    The data for this analysis are   found in  Appendix B  and the results
are  presented  in  Figure  III-7.    The correlation between observed and
calculated data is 0.72  which implies  a significant  R2 of  0.52.   This
correlation  is  slightly  better  than  the TVA results presented in the
previous section.  The slope of  the regression  line is  0.65 indicating
that Vollenweider  estimates, that   utilize Vs=10, make a high prediction
of pool concentration.  Thus, if one reduces  the Vollenweider prediction
by 35 percent (multiply by 0.65), one obtains a "corrected" least squares
estimator of the phosphorus in the  pool.

                                 111-25

-------
  c
  0
  CJ
  0
  0
  Q.
0.30 -y-

0 23 -I

0.26 -|

0 24 -i

0 22

0.20

0 13

0.16

0.14 -i

0.12

0.10

0 08

0.06 -)

0 04

0 02

0 00
              R = 0.52
              n = 22
              slope = 0.65
              • = power
              n = non-power
                  0.04     0.03     0.12      0.1C      0.2

                          Calculated Pool Phosonorus Cone, (mg/l)
                                                          0.24
                                                                  0.29
             Figure III-7.  Vollenweider  Model  Performance.
Findings.

    An estimate  of nutrient
sample of dams is presented.
data  in   the  impoundment
"corrected"  least  squares
discussed above.
                       enrichment potential derived  from  the random
                        The estimate is based on average  phosphorus
                       pool,  or  lacking  actual  data,   from  the
                       estimator  of  the  phosphorus   in  the pool
    The actual  data,  and  the  "corrected" estimates which fill  in  missing
in-pool values when upstream values exist,  are presented   in Appendix B.
Even  using  the   regressions   for large nonpower dams,  insufficient data
were available, for a  representative analysis of the  large  nonpower dams
sample, therefore, only  data for  large power dams are summarized  in  Table
III-8.  Data for  large nonpower dams can be found  in Appendix  D.   Using
the suggested  EPA guidance  value of  0.025 mg/l phosphorus in the  water
column for the sample  of large power dams, between 57.5  percent  and 77.5
percent are phosphorus enriched.
                                  111-26

-------
        Table III-8.
Phosphorus Enrichment Results
    for Large Power Dams
                     Number of Dams

Data Source
Observed Pool Data
"Corrected" Estimate
Missing Data
Total
No Phos.
Data
-
-
8
8
P < 0.025

6
3
-
9
P > 0.025

16
7
-
23
           111-27

-------
                            IV.  CASE STUDIES
INTRODUCTION

     Fifteen  case  studies  have  been selected for presentation in this
chapter as  a means  of describing  some water  quality effects resulting
from  the  impoundment  of  water  and  methods  available for mitigating
negative effects.    The  selection  of  case  study  sites  was  meant to
enhance understanding  by providing specific examples of situations which
have  occurred  in  the  past  and  not  to  be  representative   of  the
distribution of effects.  The case studies also illustrate the mitigation
action which has been taken by the responsible agencies.

     Case study suggestions and selections were made during the course of
several meetings  with interested  Federal agencies, including the Bureau
of Reclamation (BR), the  Army  Corps  of  Engineers,  and  the Tennessee
Valley Authority.    Through  their knowledge of particular sites, the set
of case studies was developed and the original  text for  this report was
provided. The  text was  edited only to place each case study in a common
format.  Therefore, the information supplied  reflects the  assessment of
the respective agency (BR, 1987b; CE, 1987; TVA, 1987b).

     The case studies are distributed throughout the country, as shown in
Figure IV-1, to show the effects  that climate  and location  may have on
water  quality  conditions.    For  example,  Lake  Casitas is located in
southern California where almost all of  the precipitation  occurs in the
winter.  This results in a highly stable stratified condition, leading to
an anoxic hypolimnion in the summer.  The  climate of  an area  will also
affect  the  period  of  stratification  and  occurrence  of mixing.  For
example, in southern states longer summers result in  a longer  period of
stratification.

     Physical characteristics  of a  reservoir, including volume, length,
depth, surface, and shoreline length, may all be related to  the observed
water quality in a reservoir or downstream.  For example, reservoirs with
a large storage area in  relation  to  drainage  area  will  have  a long
detention  time,  with  a  resulting  increased  degree  of  settling  of
sediments and organic matter.  This may result in increased decomposition
in   the   hypolimnion   and   a   possible  increased  tendency  towards
eutrophication.  The depth  of  the  reservoir  will  affect  annual heat
budgets  and  the  impoundment's  resistance to mixing.  Shoreline length
gives an indication of  the extent  of the  littoral zone  (the interface
between the land of the drainage basin and the open water of the lake).
                                 IV-1

-------
                   McCLOUD (PGiE)
                              FLAMING GORGE  3R)

                                         JOCK (CE)
                                                     £AU GALLE (CE)
                                                        o PERCY PRIEST (CE)
                                                        OLD HICKORY (CE)
                                                        SOONE (TVA)

                                                        FORT P. HENRY (TVA)
                                                        MORRIS (TVA)
                                                    RICHARD B. RUSSELL (CE)
         CASITAS (BR)
         CACHUMA (BR)
                                     LTPER 3EAR CREEK (TVA)
                                     GCTTERSVILLE (TVA)
                       MARK TWAIN (CE)
                                             NOTE:
                                                  OPERATING AGENCY
                                                  GIVEN IN (  ).
                             Figure IV-1
                Location and Name of Case Study Impoundments

The littoral zone  is often a very productive habitat and  also  contributes
organic detritus to the aquatic  system.   Table  IV-1 lists   each of these
characteristics along  with the  name  of  the impounded   river,  the major
purposes, and  the  year the impoundment was filled.

     Impoundment date is also important  because  water quality conditions
often change   with time.  For example,   Richard B. Russell  Lake  presently
has low DO conditions in the hypolimnion caused by the  recent inundation
of a  forested area  to form  the lake.   This condition should improve as
the reservoir  ages.   The newer  reservoirs, such  as Casitas   Lake, were
designed  with multilevel  intakes  and  other  measures  as   a means to
mitigate potential water quality problems.  Since reservoirs act as sinks
for substances as they  age, sediment,   organic matter,  metals  and other
pollutants entering the reservoir will accumulate in the  benthos and, if
resuspended, can have a negative effect  on water quality.

     The uses  of  a  reservoir may affect the water quality conditions in
the tailwater  since they  will be  a major  determinant of   the  method of
withdrawal and frequency of flow release.  For example,  the water may be
released and   aerated  by  being discharged  over  the   dam  spillway or
constrained  in    turbines  and   taken   from  deeper  waters   for  power
production.  The uses may also constrain the type of  mitigation measures
that can be  implemented.
                                   IV-2

-------
     Table  IV-2  gives  an  overview  of the major water quality effects
found in  the  case  study  reservoirs,  while  Table  IV-3  presents the
mitigative measures either planned or implemented.  In the narrative that
follows, the reservoirs are grouped by  the major  type of  water quality
effect.    The  major  types  of  effects  include:  low hypolimnetic DO,
increased iron and  manganese,  eutrophication,  sediment  movement, flow
regulation,  reaeration  denial,  thermal  changes, as well as neutral or
positive effects.   Several  of the  case studies  exhibit multiple water
quality effects.  The categorical listing is intended merely to highlight
one prominent effect.

LOW DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND/OR INCREASED IRON AND MANGANESE

J. Percy Priest Lake and Dam
Operating Agency: Corps of Engineers

     Location.  J. Percy Priest Dam and Lake are located  at mile  6.8 on
the Stones  River within  the metropolitan  area of Nashville, Tennessee.
Discharges from the dam  flow into  the Cumberland  River at  mile 205.9,
which is about 15 river miles upstream of the inner city ^rea.

     Principal Features.   J.  Percy Prnest Lake is approximately 211,000
feet long and has a maximum  depth of  103 feet.   The  summer recreation
pool level  has a  volume of  391,900 acre«feet, a surface area of 14,200
acres, and 213 miles of shoreline.   The  drainage area  feeding the lake
covers 571,000 acres.  The dam was completed in 1967.

     Uses.    The  major  uses  of  the  lake  and dam are flood control,
hydropower production,  and  recreation.    The  powerplant  contains one
turbine with  a capacity  of 28,000  kW.   The lake  and the reach of the
Stones River downstream of the dam  are classified  by the  state for all
stream uses,  including:  domestic water supply, industrial water supply,
fish and aquatic life, recreation, irrigation and livestock watering, and
wildlife habitat.

     Water Quality  Conditions.    J.  Percy  Priest Lake  is classified as
eutrophic as  a  result  of  nutrient  loads  directly  attributable   to
upstream  land  use  activities.    High  nutrient  concentrations  occur
particularly during the growing season and result in  heavy algal blooms,
and  other  plant  growth,  which  occasionally impair water uses such as
water supply and recreation.   The lake also exhibits other  water quality
characteristics typical  of highly productive lake systems.

     Thermal stratification  and the decay of organic material results in
an  anoxic  hypolimnion.    High  concentrations  of  dissolved  iron and
manganese  and  the  production  of  hydrogen sulfide result,  causing the
water to have the appearance  of black ink and a strong rotten   egg odor.

     During power  production,  water  withdrawn from  the lower layers of
the reservoir and discharged   through the  turbine becomes  aerated while
flowing  through  the  tailwater.   This reoxidation causes the dissolved

                               IV-3

-------









w
E

Q
*^^
w

C

T3


0
&
hH
^
•o
3
4J
CO

0)

5)

<4H
rH O
HI fl>
rl
0) 3
rH 4-1
,0 tO
ft* /ll
(Q w
HI*
rH
P.
U
C
•rl
IH
PH
<4H
O

G
0
i/i
•H
cO


Q


















73
0)
IH I-H
CO rH
01 -H
» b

^4H
•^_-«


rH ^~
O 4-1
> 0)
0)
a) u-i
0) OO •
> CO 0)
•H r4 rl
4-1 O CJ
O 4-1 Cfl

^
o^
•r^ Q)


** N-«

'O
0)
*o

SI*

.^
•g
o

1
M Q


CM CO CT^
IT) LTl LT)
O1* O^ O^
i— t rH i— (
O O O
o o o
0 O rH

O r** 0*
CO ""O ^0
r-t CM
•v
rH




CM CM rH
CM -41 <*)
rH





O O O
-HO O
CO rH r^
•V *\ *\
-^ ro CM






CM O O
CM 0^ *O
rH r4 CM


1 i i
rH" (3 C






O O O
o o o
rH O O
ON*1 C-T r-T
CO O m
rH CS CS



K
ftTs 3 3



r4 0)
O C
be £
o a)
54J IH cO IH 4-1 M
i/i 0) 4.) a) o oi
3rH > e > >,a)
o o *H nj -H o }-t
W 33 05 W Otf U O

4H,
^ §
^4 t<3 ^J Q

OK «3 rl < W W
> H 1 3 CJ « «
COI-N a)£73" Ol'H-H
OMB ^ CJ CO S ^ Ul W


ON

ON
rH
O
O
0

rH
^







in
•
CM





O
m
rH








O



o
o
co"






O
O
m
rH





«
b



0)
rH
rH
U IH
a)
W £



0)

(g ^
W rJ Q


CM
O
C\
f— (
O
§

o
0
CO

rH
rH



m
r^»
CO





O
o
0^

OJ
-*





O



o
o
in
r^.
^




0
o
o
*a
rH
m

CO


B






C h
01 a>
a) >
IH -H
U oi


^

•H •*
•H O) M Q
3 IH W 73
rH 0 CD g


CO
in
ON
rH
8
o

o
OJ
04

rH




^
CO






0)
r^
CO








Q
CO


o
o
ON
^*
m





o
o
ON
vo"
04





X



IH
0
&H C
o
54-1 V4
ui a)
3 rH >
0 O -H
CO P3 K


2
H

•H •>
• OS
PH > CO
>> IH Q
4-1 IH 0)
>H C W 73
0 01 01 S
b S K 3


ON
CO
ON
rH
8
o

o
o


in
rH



ON

ON





O
O
ON

("—
vO





O



o
8^
rH
O
j>




Q
o
o

o

rH

s{
b m



«
01
Ul
Ul
01 ^
Is

ai
rH
T-H
•H M
> -H
woes
IH > iO H
4J OI "3
§W 73
U-SS^


p^.
NO
ON
rH
O
o
o
•y
rH
p^
in






CO
rH
OJ





o
0
01
•y
_H^
rH





CO
O
rH


O
O
O
rH
rH
OJ




O
O
ON
rH
ON
CO



aT
&t< OH






Ul
0) rl
e o)
0 >
4J -H


a) g
(Q

0 g
^ 4J a.
O) 01 C
OH OI
•H 73
• VJ C
•n OH cc






rH
P< C
a, o
3 -H

«
IH 0)
0) IH
4-1 O
CO 0)
2 OS

1 1

3 Oi




o
4-1 C M
c o a>
O -H »
O 4-1 O
CO P.
73 60 O
O -H IH
O > 73
rH CO >1
b 2 IJH
1 t 1

b 2 33
..
S_(
g












o
C
01
60
nj
C
(0
JH
O>
P,
O
r^
£1

73
0)
73
•H
O
(H
P.
4J
O

11
p<
C
IV-4

-------








1
CO

—
U)
4-1
B
i
•o

3
%
M


•o
3
4-1
/-xc/5
4-1
- 0)

8.3

<4H
•H O
> VI
H 0)

tj) 3
rH 4J
CQ 01
H Cc,
g,
•H
U
-S
rl
P-
<4H
O

B
O
VI
•H
rH
CO
I*
3



















•o
0)
rlrH
(ij ^H
O> -H

0)
00 '-H
SI/1
01
•H fl IH
CO 01 c.
Q <^-



01
B
•H f~
rH £ M
01 4J 01
tH OflrH
O B -H
£ CD 6



01 ^
o w
CO 0)
14H CO rl
rH 01 O
3 rH CO
VI < •—




1 £
•rl 5 4

X P< 0)
H 01 n.


5-
bQ Q)
C Q)
0) HH


,
rH /—
O 4-1
> 0)
01
01 >4H
01 00 •
> CO 0)
•H rl IH
4J O U
O 4J CO
< :/}•—
^_.
o-!l
•r-, 4)
ss



(U
T3

^ 3
01 O
^ p«
OS M

4-1
B
01
Irapoundm
Dam
cO
•j
P.

rl B
0
o
o
*.
o
r-.
rH






in
CO
CM





o
o
•v
oo
rH





Pi

B



O
l\
CM
CO
rH





O
O
0
*\
r-


33 (^

fe 3


rl
>
•H
OS

4-1
rH
CO

^
B §
•H CO
CO *O Q) Cl
0) O
CO to rH CO O
S J U O •£.


vO
Q«l
1— 1
O
8
•v
vO






•
P.
B






O
CM
m






P.

B



P.
B







0
O
CM
*\
in
ro




X




•o

O JH
rH 0)
o >
O -H
s as

^
u
14
McCloud
Reservoi
and Dam,


CO
o^
1—1
8
o
*,
o
vO
00
rH






O
in
r«^





O
o
CM
rn





o
o
CM



I
•V
m
00
ro





O
O
O

1
CM

•v
•z

taX






O M
B 01
•H >
rH -H
O DC

z
H
IH
Norris
Reservoi
and Dam,


-3-
in
o
rH
O
o
CO
00







a.

B





o
0
in
CM
CM





0





o
O
0
•v
00
CM
in





O
O
0^

O
CM


Z K

X fe


•o
^
rH

01 rH
-Q 0)
i >
3 -H
U OS

>!>! 2
rl U H
0 O
J«! t-3 •>
01
o i4 <3


S
O
rH
O
o
0
o
H
^






P,

B





0
O
*s
vO





O.

B



8
cs

CM









rv
o


OS

(t.


UI
B
• H

5« ij
0)
UI >
01 -rt
Q OS




13 T3 M
 >
CO-H
W Qi


.
m
•o
T3 rH E <
rH rH (3 t3
r9 0)
J2 w 01 ~
o  3
co ui
01 0) •
0) 0)
P. 0) -0
P. rl C
D O (3





rH
§*-H
t/1 4J
CO
VH 0)
0) IH
4J 0
cfl 01
3 Qi

I i

3 «



rH
0
rl
4-1 B IH
BOO)
O -H S
O 4-1 O
CO P<
•o oo o
§-H !H
> -0

fc Z S
t 1 1

fc.55 SB

,,
SH
S














l^i
1
60
CO
60
•rl
4J
CO
S
01
a.
o

5j*

"O
01
73
•H
O
rl
P.
4J
O
fi
II
P.
B
IV-5

-------
I
w
0)
u
5
    •H -H
    «
     Ag
     as
     •33
     as
         81
Late Cas

Casitas
                   -3B
Flaming

Reservo

Data, UT
•
sss

££l
ti&J
O V
t". a: ij)
Gunter

Reserv

AL & T
8

I
u
£
                             IV-6

-------
£

t
    flS
    •H «j
    h. X
    *J 14
    « .3
    SI2


    II
    .8
    Jl
    Ss
        &g
        5 I

        s:

        2 °
        o -3
         EJS
                         t
                        1
-I

I48
•65
£3
                              IV-7

-------
-r
41
3 r.














s
H
3
z
1

SMO11V3UK
t.
t~
5






i
f-
rt

i
8

















CA


o

fe!
ll
4)
!o 0
1C
ft, ^
» C
M C

(/> -M
s
c
ft
1
OL

k.
C
1
c
•~ c
*J C
e •*•
4J C
M U


1
fc

C


U
A


1
v
1$
reduction being
and sludge proble
s«
a "u
£S
























O
K
ft- *
ll





J
"


inn ion
c
c
f
1C
ftr
IB
IM M
•Si






^















3

Lake Cachuu
6 Bradbury Dm,

c
0

u O
!*• 4J
S 0
B U

|5
a
w
ss
tion in hypo 1 inn i
ion. Copper sulf
? •>
sl






->





-»











Lake Casitas 6
Casita* Daa, CA


0

o

o


tJ
c
g
f
E
I
«
o
ft)
f)
s
V
4J M
II
M












-











i
— a


"c






r

tc
f
a






->

















Flaaing Gorge
Reserroir A
tm, UT











1
V
V)
S
k.



-




















O

C «•* V
0 O ft)

*J O -*

fti *J C
K C 0
3 «•«

H i
s*s
treatments and g
ophication. Sedi
SediBent/renoval
•o u •
•38?
f s!












-





*•





Guntersvillp
Reierroir & Dna
AL A IN


e


c*
— ' U
o

te
k.
•« •»*
x •
O *H k<
ion of releases t
, and localized •
1 of surface wate
HI
si-
o 













o
ft.
z «c
                                  IV-8

-------
*
l/l

3




































Z
0

H

CJ

[i-
g


w
1



C/l
z
0
H
5
g
a
H
3
3








z:
o

§
a
s





















(/I
g




U










__,
O
t/1 tH
CU *J
2: c
o
CJ
60
c
H VI
4-t 4)
rt -»
1S
4)
5
O
ui
(d E
•H >
-Q 0
i-t
H ^
U VH
*-* 5

W -H
C
O
H
U
0)
LJ
01
5
00
c
rt
on
1
Aeration
strati- 1
cation
0> H
O u-i






UJ
H

t/i






•A
C
O
H
J_J
n
u
0)
ex
o

0) v)
on a)
fl n



V» 0)
c
9 o
0) a

4-) 3
Vi O
p.-—1

"O
'4-t O
O H

on *fl
c
H O
'a
TJ TJ
-C G

v) (0
0) rH











OH

























0>




>> "
o <9

u

as 'a

O t-J

c
o

u
BJ
£
0)
c
o
u

c
0)
V)

0)
o
c

4_»
c
01




01
a.

(fl -H
0)
&o >
G 3)
pt

3 O
4-1 O
tn p.










a.






























jg d

TJ J4
to u
C£ O
Qi
01
J£ T3
01
fl
u
c


•H i-l
£ 0
V) 01

•a
0) C
W 41
fl M
a) >,
VH X
0 0
c
H O
[/) *J
o c

m H
0) O
c p. .

MX 1)


0 M «]

cow
0 > C
H El H
4J (U
—i at a)
tt-< *j
V)
O t*-! >.
o o «

































-


0)
V)
I/I <


s
PQ Q
Q
-o



o X
H m
a: J



c


C 0)
O — '
•H -O
13


O W
P. VI
Is

C 0)

S '
3 e c
w G H
>i nj 4-J
VI •»"(
cSl
0 0
H 41 u
i-l I/]
(Q m c
t-i a> o
0) l-t H
(fl U *-»
C B)
T3 H 0
0) 'H
— -< O ^M
3U
r- nl
W 00 M
COW
t-H r-t V)

































-
->

^
 B

U Q

nj
01 M
CO H
o

01 0)
P. VI
CX 01
tD lii
                                  IV-9

-------
iron  and  manganese  to  precipitate,  staining  downstream areas.  Iron
concentrations are reduced to low  levels  a  short  distance downstream.
Manganese, however, is very persistent with effects evident some distance
downstream.  The manganese concentrations affect  domestic and industrial
water supplies, particularly under the anaerobic summer conditions.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.   A mitigation measure that has been
implemented is the coordination  of  releases  with  another  dam.   When
discharges are  required (for power production) from J. Percy Priest Lake
during the stratification period, releases are  coordinated with releases
from Old  Hickory Lock and Dam on the mainstem of the Cumberland River so
that  manganese  concentrations  will   have  a  lesser  effect  on  water
treatment plants downstream.

     Another measure  selected for testing in 1987 is the installation of
pumps in the  forebay,  upstream  of  the  penstock,  to  cause localized
mixing.   This measure  will force  entrainment of surface water into the
withdrawal zone of the turbine intake.  Thus,  a high  percentage of high
quality surface  water will enter the penstock and, in effect, prevent or
reduce the  percentage withdrawal  of the  low quality  waters within the
hypolimnion.
Old Hickory Lake. Lock, and Dam
Operating Agency: Corps of Engineers

     Location.  Old Hickory Lake, Lock, and Dam are located at mile 216.2
on the Cumberland River in Davidson and Sumner Counties, Tennessee, about
25 river miles upstream of Nashville, Tennessee.

     Principal Features.   The reservoir was completed in 1954.  The lake
extends almost 100 miles upstream to Cordell Hill,  at river  mile 313.5,
and has  a maximum  depth of  70 feet.   The  surface area of the lake is
22,500 acres and the volume is 420,000 acre*feet.   The  drainage area is
898,000 acres  below upstream  dams.   There are several large embayments
covering 5,000 acres in the downstream portion of the reservoir  that are
fairly  isolated  from  the  main  channel  flow.   Flows to the lake are
regulated by three upstream tributary storage reservoirs.   The reservoir
is generally  confined to  the old  river channel  and is very narrow and
serpentine, with an average width of 1,500 feet,  excluding embayments.

     Uses.  The main uses of the dam  and lake  are hydropower production
and provision  of navigation  upstream to  the Cordell Hull Lock and Dam.
They also serve for flood control,  recreation, and  water quality.   The
reach of the Cumberland River downstream of Old Hickory is classified for
public water supply and fish and aquatic life, and has a DO standard of 5
mg/1.

     Water Quality  Conditions.   Analysis of data collected by the Corps
of Engineers shows that Old  Hickory  may  be  thermally  stratified from
April or  May to  September.  Dissolved oxygen concentrations during this
period become reduced in the downstream forebay of the lake as well as in

                                IV-10

-------
the releases  to the  tailwater.  These conditions are most severe during
periods of drought or low stream flow.

     Water quality routing studies  have shown  that inflows  from one of
the upstream reservoirs, Cordell Hull  Dam, are cooler and, therefore, are
routed  beneath   the  epilimnion   during  stratification.     They  are
subsequently  released  in  the  tailwaters  downstream.  During times of
drought or low flow, such  as  June  through  August,  these  inflows are
reduced and  the retention time in the hypolimnion is increased, lowering
DO concentrations in the releases of Old Hickory.  A  minimum observed DO
concentration  of  2.1  mg/1  occurred  in  August-September 1975.  Flows
during this  period  were  unusually  low  due  primarily  to  changes in
discharges   from   controlled   releases  upstream.    Seasonal  drought
conditions in the lake also contributed to these low DO values.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.   Since Old Hickory Lock and Dam are
operated  for navigation and hydropower generation, the pool elevation is
maintained within a tolerance of  a  few  feet,  in  accordance  with the
project  water  control  plan.    This regular operation is maintained in
concert with the discharges  of dams  upstream whose  operations are also
specified  by  project  water  control  plans.    The DO release problems
associated with this system can be mitigated only if flows resulting from
the projects can be accurately forecast in time to reschedule operations.

     The need for a predictive capability of flows and their  effects led
to the  development of  a DO  routing  model between the uppermost storage
project, Wolf Creek, and Old Hickory Dam.   Modeling results are  used to
evaluate potential  DO problems  in the releases from Old Hickory Dam and
to test various operational changes which might be required to  avoid low
DO concentrations.   There  is some  flexibility in the operations of the
upstream storage impoundments.   Simulations of  these operations suggest
that a  spring target allocation for storage in the impoundments upstream
will provide water in sufficient quantity  for flows  through Old Hickory
Lake during the summer stratification  period.  Other more detailed models
are under development which will  be  used  to  evaluate  the  effects of
particular point  and nonpoint  source discharges  or in other situations
where more realistic and detailed simulations  of reservoir  dynamics are
required.
Richard B. Russell Lake and Dam
Operating Agency: Corps of Engineers

     Location.   Richard B.  Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River
at river  mile  275  Elberton,  Georgia,  on  the  Georgia-South Carolina
border.   Two other  Corps of  Engineers reservoirs,  Clarks Hill Lake and
Hartwell Lake, are located immediately below and above Richard B. Russell
Lake, respectively.

     Principal Features.   Richard  B. Russell  Lake has a surface area of
26,700 acres, a volume of 1,030,000 acre-feet,  and a  shoreline  length of
550 miles.   Mean  and maximum  depths are 38 and 150 feet, respectively,

                                IV-11

-------
with a  theoretical hydraulic  residence time  of 102  days.  The dam was
completed in 1984, but work on  the  dam  and  powerhouse,  including the
installation of  four turbines,  will  continue until late 1989.  The major
inflow to the lake is the Savannah River, which is  regulated immediately
upstream by  the operation  of Hartwell  Dam.   Two large embayments were
formed near mid-lake by the flooding  of  Rocky  River  to  the  east and
Beaverdam Creek to the west.

     Uses.   Richard B. Russell  Dam and Lake were authorized by the Flood
Control  Act  of  1966  to  provide  power  generation,  incidental flood
control,  recreation,  streamflow  regulation,  and  water  supply on the
Savannah River.  The installation of four reversible  turbines for pumped
storage  operation  will  continue  until  late  1989.  Current operation
allows for power generation using four conventional turbines  rated at 75
MW each.   When  completed, the  powerhouse will  have a total generating
capacity of 600 MW.  The  dam is  currently operated  to meet  peak power
demand.   Water from the Rocky River embayment also is the primary source
of drinking water for the city of Abbeville,  South Carolina.   Dissolved
oxygen  standards  require  a  minimum  concentration  of 6.0 mg/1 in the
tailwaters.

     Water Quality Conditions.  Water quality conditions in the lake have
changed markedly since its impoundment.  During the initial stages of the
filling process, water quality conditions were strongly influenced by the
inundation  and   subsequent  decomposition  of  terrestrial  vegetation,
detritus, and organic materials contained in flooded soils.  Nearly 9,000
acres of  forested area  were inundated  during filling, resulting in the
inundation of an estimated 550,000 metric  tons green  weight of standing
vegetation and  5,100 metric tons of litter and detritus.  While standing
vegetation  was  determined  to  have  minimal  direct  impacts  on water
quality, the  decomposition of  litter and  detritus has had a pronounced
impact, particularly with respect  to  DO  concentrations  in  the bottom
waters.   Dissolved oxygen  concentrations in bottom waters were severely
depressed during the summer of 1984, and elevated  concentrations of iron
and manganese  prevented the  testing of turbines due to downstream water
quality impacts.  Also during 1984,  powerhouse construction necessitated
the  release  of  water  through  tainter gates.  This operational scheme
reduced flushing of the hypolimnion, contributing to the  accumulation of
poor  quality  hypolimnetic  waters.    Following  completion of the four
conventional generators, releases were made from the lower portion of the
water column.   This  greatly reduced  the residence time of hypolimnetic
waters and increased flushing.  Inflows from Hartwell  Lake were observed
to enter  Richard B.  Russell Lake  as an  interflowing density  current,
which further increased flushing of deeper strata.

     Water  quality  conditions  were  also  impaired  in  the  two major
tributaries.   Anoxic conditions  developed in near-bottom waters by late
March and iron and manganese concentrations began to increase.   By early
June much  of the  water column in each embayment was anoxic and elevated
concentrations of soluble nutrients and iron and manganese were recorded.
These  conditions  persisted  until  turnover   in  mid-November.   On one
occasion  during  summer  stratification,   the   withdrawal   of  anoxic

                                IV-12

-------
hypolimnetic water  form the Rocky River embayment resulted in the short-
term  closure  of  the  Abbeville  water  treatment  facility  until   the
relocation of the intake to a higher elevation was completed.

     During 1985,  the decomposition of litter and detritus accounted for
approximately  60  percent  of  the  total  hypolimnetic  oxygen  demand.
However, field  and laboratory studies indicate that as organic materials
are decomposed, oxygen demand should decrease by approximately 70 percent
by 1988.   These  declines may  have accounted  for the less severe water
quality conditions observed during 1986 and 1987.

     During the summer stratification of 1985 through 1987, water quality
conditions in  the main portion of the reservoir greatly improved.  These
changes are related to the  following:    decreases  in  the  quantity of
labile terrestrial  organic matter, changes in flow patterns in the lake,
and operation of an oxygen injection system in the forebay.  Improvements
in the  two major  impoundments were  far less pronounced, suggesting the
importance of changes  in  flow  patterns  in  influencing  water quality
conditions in the main portion of the reservoir.

     Mitigation/Enhancement  Measures.    An  oxygen injection system was
designed and installed in Richard B.  Russell  Lake  for  the  purpose of
maintaining a  minimum DO concentration of 6 mg/1 in the tailwater.  This
is the DO  standard  for  the  tailwater  and  is  based  on  the habitat
requirements of  the fishery  in the  upper reaches  of Clarks Hill Lake.
The injection system is composed of two independent components.   A pulse
component, consisting  of eight diffuser lines, is oriented perpendicular
to the intake section of the dam and  is located  approximately 10  to 16
feet above bottom grade.  This component of the injection system provides
additional oxygen  injection capability during generation and  is capable
of  delivering  oxygen  at  a  maximum  rate  of 80 tons/day.  The second
component was designed for continuous injection of oxygen at rates  up to
100 tons/day,  and is located approximately 1 mile upstream from the dam.
During the summer stratified period, liquid oxygen is  transported to the
site, evaporated,  and delivered  to the diffuser system through a system
of pipes.

     Depending on  conditions in  the lake  and tailwater,  the system is
generally  operated   from  early  April  until  mid  to  late  November.
Injection rates are varied periodically to insure adequate and economical
operation by  routine field monitoring and through the use of a numerical
model.  To date, the system  has been  operated successfully  and problem
conditions have  not been observed in the tailwater.  The system has also
led to significant increases in the  average summer  oxygen concentration
of bottom waters in areas immediately upstream from the dam.
Upper Bear Creek Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Location.   Upper Bear  Creek Reservoir and Dam are located on Upper
Bear Creek in northwestern Alabama in Marion County.

                                 IV-13

-------
     Principal   Features.     The  reservoir  is 37,000 feet long, with an
average volume  of 37,400 acre-feet,  and a maximum depth of 70 feet.   The
total drainage  area above the dam site is 72,300 acres.

     Uses.    The  reservoir  provides for fish and wildlife, recreation,
shoreline development,  and water quality control,  and serves  as a water
supply  for  several   communities.     The  reservoir was also designed to
provide water for  the   weekend  operation  of  the  Bear  Creek Floatway
located downstream from the dam.

     Water  Quality Conditions.   Low summer DO concentrations occur in the
Upper Bear  Creek Reservoir.  Anoxic conditions in the lower depths of the
reservoir  provide   a   reducing   environment,  which   results  in  the
resolublization of iron, manganese,  and sulfur  present in  the sediments
and  causing  high  concentrations   in  the  water.   One source of these
constituents is believed to be upstream mining activities, but   they can
also occur  naturally.

     The water   treatment plant that uses the reservoir as a water supply
often struggles with  the removal of the iron  and manganese.   When water
is  released  from  the  lower  depths  of  the  reservoir,  the iron and
manganese  oxidize  and  precipitate  in  the  creek,  leaving  it highly
stained,  with   large  growths  of  iron bacteria and precipitates coating
much of the aquatic life  below  the  stream.    Also,  concentrations of
hydrogen sulfide  as  high  as 0.5  mg/1 have  been detected in the creek.
Hydrogen sulfide in concentrations  greater than  0.002 mg/1  can be toxic
to aquatic   life.  In 1986, iron and manganese concentrations of 6.9 mg/1
and 3.6 mg/1, respectively,  were  measured  immediately  below  the dam,
while  concentrations  of  approximately  half these values were measured
three miles below the dam.

     Another effect of the dam occurs when the location of the release is
changed.   Water released  from the  surface overflow might be 10 to 15°C
warmer than the water released from the low-level release.   Changing the
withdrawal   point  due   to  the  decreasing  reservoir elevation probably
causes thermal  shock  to downstream  aquatic organisms.

     A biological study of  Upper Bear  Creek Reservoir  was conducted by
the State  of Alabama   during  1979 to  1983.   The study concluded that
benthic macroinvertebrate levels were adversely affected by the reservoir
water  quality.    In  addition,  fish  population  data indicated a poor
fishery exists  in the reservoir.

     Mitigation/Enhancement  Measures.    In  1987,  a  diffused aeration
system  was  installed  in  the  reservoir,  consisting of four diffusers
stretched across the  old river channel.  Compressors  supply the  air and
are run  continuously from about March to September.  The aeration system
significantly   warmed   the   hypolimnion,   rendering   the   reservoir
stratification  less stable.  Dissolved oxygen levels have also increased.
However, the reservoir has remained thermally  and chemically stratified.
This  might  be  due   in  part  to   several compressor malfunctions which

                                IV-14

-------
resulted  in  the  operation  of  only  two  diffusers for several  weeks.
During the summer of 1987, all  of the iron was converted to  the oxidized
form, but  most of  the manganese  was still  in the dissolved form.  Both
iron and manganese levels increased as the reservoir  became more anoxic.
However, the  1987 concentrations  of iron  and manganese were lower than
they were before the aeration system was installed.
Casitas Lake and Dam
Operating Agency:   Bureau of Reclamation

     Location.  Lake Casitas is located in southern California near Santa
Barbara.  The two main tributary inflows are Coyote Creek and the Robles-
Casitas Diversion Canal.

     Principal Features.  The reservoir has an active capacity of 251,000
acre-feet, a  maximum depth  of 260  feet, a surface area of 2,700 acres,
and 31 miles of shoreline.  The reservoir was filled in 1959.  The Coyote
Creek watershed has a direct drainage basin of 21,100 acres and is former
ranch land that is now managed for recreation and water  quality control.
The  Robles-Casitas  Diversion  Canal  brings  in  water from the Ventura
River, which drains 48,000 acres.  This indirect  drainage basin includes
numerous  smal'i  holdings,  large  ranches,  public  domain  land,  and a
population of about  10,000.    Due  to  the  climate  of  the  area, the
reservoir is  typically filled during the winter rains, and then is drawn
down steadily during the summer when  there is  little or  no significant
precipitation.  The dam was originally designed with a multi-level intake
to the outlet structure that allows selected strata to be withdrawn.

     Uses.    The  Casitas  Municipal  Water  District  manages  the lake
primarily for  water supply.  Secondary water uses include irrigation and
nonbody contact recreation.

     Water Quality Conditions.  From 1959 to 1967,  water below  about 60
feet  from  the  surface  and,  at  times, as little as 30 feet below the
surface  became  anaerobic  during  the  summer  thermal  stratification.
Unacceptable concentrations of manganese and hydrogen sulfide accumulated
in this anaerobic zone.   At  the same  time, blooms  of taste  and odor-
producing  algae  developed  in  the  surface water.  Under these extreme
situations, attempts to use the multi-level intake to withdraw water from
the narrow  zone between  the algal  blooms and the anaerobic hypolimnion
often failed.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.  In 1968, a  diffused air injection
reaeration system  was installed in the reservoir that injects compressed
air  into  the  hypolimnion  through  a  series  of  diffusers  that  are
positioned 80  to 100  feet from the bottom.  The system has been refined
over the years.

     The reaeration  eliminated  the  water  quality  problems  caused by
manganese and  hydrogen sulfide  accumulations in the hypolimnion.  It is
now possible to withdraw water from  100 feet  or more  below the surface

                                IV-15

-------
during summer  stratification, thus  avoiding any taste and odor problems
from surface algae.  This, in turn, allowed a reduction in the  number of
copper sulfate  applications needed  to control   algae.   Aeration of the
cooler depths of the lake during  the  summer  months  made  possible the
establishment of  a "2-story fishery" with warm-water species, like bass,
in the upper waters and rainbow trout in the deeper waters.


Lake Cachuma and Bradbury Dam
Operating Agency:  Bureau of Reclamation

     Location.  Bradbury Dam is located  on  the  Santa  Ynez  River near
Ventura in southern California.

     Principal Features.  The reservoir has an active capacity of 202,000
acre-feet, a maximum depth of 190  feet, a  surface area  of 3,100 acres,
and a  42-mile shoreline.   The drainage area is 267,000 acres, with most
of the drainage basin  consisting  of  the  Los  Padres  National Forest.
Runoff is  extremely variable  from year  to year, with almost all of the
annual runoff concentrated in the winter months.

     Uses.  The major use of the reservoir is water supply.   Most of the
water  districts  withdraw  their  supplies  from  the  upper end of Lake
Cachuma through a multi-level selective withdrawal  tower.   However, the
Santa  Ynez  River  Water  Conservation  District  (SYRWCD) withdraws its
supply of water from the bottom outlet of the dam.

     Water Quality Conditions.  During the summer, thermal stratification
results in  anoxic conditions occurring in the hypolimnion.  As a result,
manganese and  hydrogen sulfide  accumulate.   These conditions adversely
affect the  SYRWCD domestic  water supplies  for users who withdraw water
from the bottom outlet of the dam.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.  In 1981,  a  diffused air injection
reaeration system  was installed  near the  outlet works of Bradbury Dam.
This system was designed to treat only the lower basin  of the reservoir.
It consists  of a  compressor that  pumps air to four diffusers suspended
about 30 to 40 feet off the bottom.

     Before the aeration  system  was  installed,  water  quality usually
deteriorated to extremely poor levels by early August.  With the aeration
system in place and beginning in April, the  lower basin  of Lake Cachuma
was sufficiently aerated to extend the period of acceptable water quality
about a month to a month and a half.   This extension  was significant to
the SYRWCD water suppliers.

     In 1985,  the SYRWCD added a flexible extension to the bottom outlet
withdraw that allowed water  to  be  withdrawn  from  the well-oxygenated
waters of  the epilimnion.  The new outlet was operated with the aeration
system in 1985, but the district operated it without the  aeration system
during the  summers of  1986 and  1987.  So far, the SYRWCD has been very
satisfied with using the flexible outlet alone.

                               IV-16

-------
EUTROPHICATION

Guntersvi11e Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Location.   Guntersvilie Dam  is located  on the  Tennessee River at
river mile 349.0 near  the city  of Guntersville,  Alabama.  Guntersville
Reservoir  is  located  in  Jackson  and  Marshall Counties, Alabama, and
Marion County, Tennessee.

     Principal Features.  The  reservoir is  401,000 feet  long.   At the
normal maximum  pool level,  the reservoir  has an average volume of 1.02
million acre-feet,  a maximum  depth of  60 feet,  and a  surface area of
67,900 acres.  The dam was completed in 1939.

     Uses.   Guntersville Reservoir  is the  second largest of the multi-
purpose reservoirs operated by the TVA for navigation, flood control, and
power production.   Recreation,  water supply,  and assimilative capacity
are significant  secondary uses.   Four  turbine generators  with a total
rated capacity  of 102  MW are  used for power production.  Drawdowns are
used  for  flood  control,  aquatic  weed  control,  and  vector (disease
carrier) control.  Eight major public and industrial users withdraw water
directly from the reservoir,  while  there  are  30  major  municipal and
domestic  waste   dischargers  and   16  industrial  dischargers  to  the
reservoir.  The Alabama  Department of  Environmental Management  and the
Tennessee  Department  of  Health  and  Environment  have  identified the
following as appropriate uses of the waters of  the reservoir:   domestic
and  industrial   water  supply,   recreation,  fish  and  aquatic  life,
navigation, irrigation,  and livestock  watering.   The Guntersville Lock
System is  an integral   part of the 650-mile water transportation channel
of the Tennessee River system.

     Water  Quality  Conditions.    Guntersville  Reservoir  is thermally
stratified  in  the  deeper,  downstream  portion during the summer.  The
stratification results in hypo!imnetic DO depression.  The upstream third
of the  reservoir is  well-mixed,   while the  midsection is a transition
section.  More than 80 percent of the nutrient budget to the reservoir is
contributed by the Tennessee River.

     The  morphometric,   hydraulic,   and   nutrient  characteristics  of
Guntersville Reservoir provide ideal  conditions for  macrophyte and algal
growth.    It has  been classified as highly eutrophic by several commonly
used indices.  Several  biological and  water quality  parameters indicate
that Guntersville  Reservoir's trophic state is increasing in a eutrophic
direction.     Aquatic  macrophyte  growth,   heterotrophic  growth,   total
organic  carbon,  and BOD  are increasing.    More  than 25  percent of the
reservoir acreage is infested  with macrophytes.   Hydrilla  continues to
spread,  with a 30 percent increase in the past three years.
                               IV-17

-------
     Many areas  of the  reservoir are  of limited  use due to macrophyte
growth.   It also  greatly diminishes  aesthetic appeal  for swimming and
boating.    Algal-induced  taste  and  odor  complaints from public water
supply customers are common, and water treatment plants must continuously
adjust chemical concentrations to provide acceptable drinking water.

     From 1974  to 1983,  significant downward trends in fish biomass and
numbers occurred  for one  or more  size classes  of eight  of the eleven
dominant fish  species.  However, in 1985 biomass estimates were over 2.5
times greater than in 1983 and were the  greater than  any other  time in
the period of 1974 to 1983.  The condition of several important game fish
species in the reservoir  was better  than the  average for  all mainstem
reservoirs.

     Approximately 7 million recreational visits are made to Guntersville
Reservoir annually.  Continued water quality  degradation will  result in
significantly  fewer  visits  and  hence  revenue reductions to the local
economy.  Aquatic macrophytes, excessive algal growth, and to some extent
declining  fisheries  are  the  most  obvious problem as perceived by the
public.  A recent  survey indicated  that respondents  felt the reservoir
would be unusable by the year 2000 if  water degradation continues at its
present rate.  Conversely,  a 13  percent rise  in visits  is expected if
water quality conditions remain stable.

     Mitigation/Enhancement  Measures.     Several  efforts  to  improve/
mitigate  conditions  in  Guntersville  Reservoir  are   currently  being
undertaken.    Herbicide  treatment  has been used for aquatic macrophyte
control, and recently grass carp were introduced.  The cost-effectiveness
and weed  control capabilities  of the herbicide and grass carp are being
evaluated.   The  possibility  of  clearing  boat  lanes  of   macrophyte
vegetation  to  allow  fishermen  to  reach embayment areas is also being
evaluated.

     Sediment   and   nutrient   controls   are   planned   for  selected
subwatersheds.     When  these  controls  are  implemented,  in-reservoir
techniques, such  as  sediment  removal/covering  and  aeration,  will be
implemented.    When  used  in  combination with reduced pollutant loads,
water quality improvements will be visible  immediately.   Water quality,
land,  and   fisheries  management  plans  have  been  prepared  for  the
reservoir.
Boone Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Location.  Boone Reservoir  is one  of six  TVA impoundments  in the
Holston River  Basin in northeast Tennessee.  Boone Dam is located on the
South Fork Holston River at mile 18.6, approximately 1.4 miles  below its
confluence with the Watauga River.
                                 IV-18

-------
     Principal  Features.    Boone  Reservoir  was  completed in 1952, is
91,900 feet long, has a maximum depth of 122 feet,  and has  a mean depth
of 44  feet.   It stores 189,100 acre«feet of water at the normal maximum
pool  level,  and  has  a  surface  area  of  4,310  acres.    It  has an
uncontrolled drainage  area of  428,000 acres,  a total  drainage area of
1,180,000 acres, and a 122-mile shoreline.

     Uses.  The primary purposes for  the construction  of Boone  Dam and
Reservoir  were   flood  control,  regulation  of  flows  for  downstream
navigation, and  to the  extent consistent  with the  first two purposes,
hydroelectric  power  generation.    Flood  control  rules  require  that
definite amounts of storage space be reserved from January to  May.  When
flood control and power generation constraints permit, the reservoir pool
elevation is controlled to  accommodate other  uses, including recreation
and fishing.   During the fish spawning season, the reservoir water level
is held as stable as possible for a two-week period.

     Water Quality Conditions.  Boone Reservoir  was studied  and modeled
by the  TVA in  the development  of a water quality management plan.  The
Boone  Management  Plan  identified  use  impairments  due  to  bacterial
contamination,  sludge  deposition,  and  toxicity  in  portions  of  the
reservoir  and  its  tributaries.    In   addition,  metalimnetic  oxygen
depletion,  eutrophication,   and  litter   were  identified  as  serious
concerns.  Boone Reservoir is the  most eutrophic  tributary reservoir in
the TVA  system.   Nutrient loadings  of 232  g/m^/yr Nitrogen (as N) and
10.7 g/m2/yr Phosphorus (as P) produce chlorophyll at levels ranging from
12 to  16 mg/m3.   Secchi  depths (a  measure of  clarity) of  5 feet are
common during the summer.  A pronounced metalimnetic  oxygen reduction is
believed to result primarily from algal decomposition and/or respiration.
These problems are the result  of  both  point  and  nonpoint  sources of
pollution.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.  Point sources are being dealt with
by  state  regulatory  programs.     Their   efforts  have   resulted  in
construction  of  two  expanded  municipal  waste treatment facilities at
Johnson City, Tennessee.    Facilities  are  under  construction  at Bluff
City, Tennessee,  and Bristol,  Tennessee/Virginia.  In addition, Bristol
is separating their combined sewers to reduce the incidence of collection
system failure and hydraulic overload of the treatment plant.

     Nonpoint sources of pollution to Boone Reservoir include runoff from
livestock operations, cropland,  urban  areas,  landfill  and  dump sites,
mining areas,  and construction   activities.   In addition, combined sewer
overflows, failing septic tanks, and roadbank and streambank erosion also
contribute.     Nonpoint  sources  will   be  addressed  by  a  variety  of
nonregulatory  approaches,   including  waste  management  demonstrations,
public  education,   and  cooperative  projects  involving the State, EPA,
TDHE, USDA,  and the public.

     The TVA is carrying  out several   tasks  in  1987-88  to  address the
following:   animal    waste   management,    houseboat  waste  management,
productivity management,  and  biological   evaluation  of  stream segments

                               IV-19

-------
impacted by  toxics.   During 1988, the installation of four animal  waste
management systems is planned,   as well  as educating  the public  on the
need for animal waste management systems.   Presently 19 of the worst case
operations have applied for the TVA  cost share  program.    Four of these
have been selected for initial  installation,  and the effectiveness of the
systems for eliminating bacteria from the streams will  be  monitored.   In
1987, pre-installation  monitoring was  initiated and  will  continue into
the beginning of 1988  to provide  a preliminary  data base   on bacterial
contamination.  Once the systems are completed, a monitoring program will
determine the effectiveness of  the measures.

     The TVA is evaluating methods of dealing with  houseboat wastes and,
in cooperation  with marina operators, will install  one or more treatment
facilities.  Public education activities will be used to encourage use of
these facilities.

Eau Galle Lake and Dam
Operating Agency:   Corps of Engineers

     Location.    Eau  Galle  Dam  is  located  on  the  Eau  Galle River
immediately  upstream  from  Spring  Valley  in  west  central Wisconsin,
approximately 50 miles east of  St. Paul, Minnesota.

     Principal Features.   The   lake is  3,300 feet long,  has a volume of
1,500 acre«feet, a maximum depth of 30 feet,  a surface area  of 150 acres,
and a  shoreline length of 25 miles.  The watershed has an area of 41,000
acres,  with  land  use  primarily  dedicated  to  dairy  operations  and
associated agriculture, pastureland, and woodlots.

     The  dam  is  a  rolled-earth  and  rock-filled  structure  and  was
completed in 1968.  The outlet   structure provides  for both  surface and
bottom releases.  The reservoir was filled in 1969.

     Uses.   Eau Galle  Dam and Lake were authorized by the  Flood Control
Act of 1958 to provide flood  control for  the village  of Spring Valley,
Wisconsin,  and  associated  downstream  areas.   Additional uses include
recreation and fish and wildlife habitat.

     Water Quality Conditions.    Eau Galle  Lake is  thermally stratified
with  seasonal  anoxic  conditions  occurring  in the hypolimnion.  It is
considered to be eutrophic  and exhibits  excessive algal   and macrophyte
growth.    Seasonal  high  flow  events  dominate the external loading of
nutrients.  The growth  of algae  and macrophytes,  coupled  with episodic
tributary   loading,   contribute   to   reduced   transparency  and  the
establishment of nutrient-rich  sediments.

     The release of cool  hypolimnetic water  through the   low-level gate
outflow increases  the heat  content of  the lake and reduces the thermal
stability  of the lake.  The reduced  thermal stability  and wind-induced
mixing result in exchange between phosphorus-rich hypolimnetic waters and
the epilimnetic waters, suggesting that internal  phosphorus loadings may
be significant in the lake.

                               IV-20

-------
     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.   In 1986, hypolimnetic application
of  aluminum  sulfate  was  conducted  to   control  internal  phosphorus
recycling  from  anoxic  sediments.    Following  application, phosphorus
concentrations in  bottom waters,  internal phosphorus  loading rate, and
the abundance of algae were reduced relative to previous years.  Prior to
treatment, summer internal phosphorus loadings  (as P) averaged 15.6 mg/sq
m/day.   Following application, internal phosphorus loadings were reduced
to 6.5  mg/sq  m/day.    Algal  biomass  remained  relatively  high after
treatment.   The high levels are related to the proliferation of an algal
species, Ceratium sp., that has the ability to migrate vertically  in the
water  column.    The  algae  may  have  obtained  additional  sources of
phosphorus from  nutrient-rich river  waters, which  enter the  lake in a
density current  at the  depth of the thermocline.  The effectiveness and
longevity  of  the  treatment,  as  well  as  mechanisms  governing algal
abundance, will be more completely assessed during ongoing studies.
FLOW REGULATION/REAERATION DENIAL

Norris Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Location.   Norris Dam  is located on the Clinch River at river mile
79.8 in northeast Tennessee.

     Principal Features.  The reservoir is 385,000 feet long.   At normal
maximum pool  level, it has an average volume of  2.04 million acre-feet,
a maximum depth of 200 feet, and a surface area of 34,200 acres.

     Uses.  Norris Reservoir is  a  multi-purpose    reservoir, primarily
used for flood control, navigation, and hydropower production.  Secondary
uses  include  recreation,  fish  and  aquatic  life,  water  supply, and
assimilative capacity.   The  rated capacity  for power production is 101
MW, produced by two Francis turbines.  Hydropower operations provide cold
water conditions suitable for "trout waters"  and have been so classified
by the State of Tennessee.   Cold water  releases also  benefit the steam
electric  power  generation  plant  located  downstream  on  Melton  Hill
Reservoir.  The tail water extends 15  miles to  the headwaters  of Melton
Hill  Reservoir,  and  is  used  for  boat, bank, and wade fishing.  Boat
fishing occurs when turbines are operating,  while bank  and wade fishing
are limited to primarily when the turbines are not operating.

     Hydropower production causes a fluctuation in the tailwater level  of
about 6 feet, with the river width changing from   approximately 432 feet
to  310  feet.    Until  1984, minimum streamflow downstream from the dam
consisted of leakage from the dam, and there were no  hydropower releases
for an average of three weeks.

     Water Quality  Conditions.   A study of the tail waters conducted from
1971 to 1977 identified low DO and inadequate minimum flow as the primary
factors limiting  further development  of the trout fishery.  The benthic

                               IV-21

-------
fauna  were  dominated  by  tolerant  organisms,  while the fish condition
factor, a ratio of the weight of  a  fish  to  its  length,  decreased an
average of  11 percent each year during periods when DO levels decreased.
Until 1981, DO concentrations  in the  hydropower releases  remained less
than 6  mg/1  for  an average  of approximately one-third of the year, and
remained less than 3  mg/1  for  55  days  during  periods  of hydropower
releases.    When  DO  concentrations  were  at  minimum  levels and both
turbines were  operating,  releases  would  flow  about  13  miles before
natural aeration resulted in an increase to about 5 mg/1.

     Mitigation/Enhancement  Measures.    In  1981, a hub baffle aeration
system was installed on the two  turbines.   It resulted  in increases of
minimum  DO  concentrations  of  2  to  3  mg/1  in released waters.  The
aeration  system  was  operated  when  DO  in  the  hydropower scroll case
decreased in  concentration to less than 4 mg/1,  with a resulting minimum
DO of 3 mg/1.

     Greater  minimum  flows  have  been  maintained  since  1984  by the
construction of a flow regulation weir approximately two miles downstream
from the dam.  Water stored behind the weir, supplied by pulsed flow from
the hydropower  units, has  since provided  a minimum  downstream flow of
approximately 200 ft^/sec.  Approximate one-half hour discharges from one
turbine is  required to  fill the  pool behind  the weir,  which can then
supply flow downstream for 12 hours.

     In an effort to  speed  recovery  of  tail waters,  desirable benthic
invertebrates were  transplanted to these waters.  There has also been an
increase in the stocking  of fingerling  and catchable  rainbow and brown
trout.    There  is  an  apparent  trend toward improving trout condition
following  aeration,  although  there  are  no  statistically significant
differences between  the pre-aeration  and post-aeration years.  Although
the tailwater benthic fauna continue to be dominated by tolerant species,
less tolerant  organisms, which  are also  desirable food  for trout, are
occurring more frequently.  The 1987 benthic fauna samples showed a large
increase in  mayfly abundance,  which may  signal the beginning of a more
rapid recovery.  Caddisflies, crayfish,  snails,   and  mayflies  are also
beginning to influence the benthic community structure.  The delayed, and
as yet incomplete, recovery of the tailwater benthic  fauna community may
be because  (1) the DO concentrations are still too low to allow survival
of some sensitive species, (2)  there  is  a  shortage  of  colonizers of
sensitive forms,  or (3)  because full  recovery simply takes longer than
expected.

     Together, all  mitigative  efforts  have  dramatically  improved the
fishery of  Norris tailwater.   During 1980-83, when DO improvements were
made and public awareness  of  the  fishery  at  Norris  increased,  a 17
percent increase in fishing effort occurred.  Following the establishment
of minimum flow conditions,  angling pressure  increased 79  percent from
the 1970s  and was also significantly greater than 1980-83.  Total annual
trout harvest increased 77 percent in  the 1980s  compared to  the 1970s,
while the  average annual catch rates improved from 0.34 fish/hr in 1973-
74 to 0.42 fish/hr for 1980-85.   These  increases are  attributable to a

                               IV-22

-------
number of  factors, including public interest and awareness of efforts to
improve the fisheries; provision  of more  stable, aesthetically pleasing
and  more  "fishable"  waters  by  the maintenance of a minimum flow; and
additional access created by the flow regulation weir.

     Presently, the recovery of  benthic fauna  may not  yet be complete,
and growth  of individual trout has only been minimally affected, but the
fishery as a whole has dramatically improved.  The fishery  will continue
to be monitored to evaluate sufficient DO and flow conditions.
Mark Twain Lake and Clarence Cannon Dam
Operating Agency:  Corps of Engineers

     Location.  Clarence Cannon Dam is located on the Salt River at river
mile 63 in northeastern Missouri.

     Principal Features.  The reservoir is 132,000 feet long, and  has an
active  storage  volume  of  457,000  acre-feet, a surface area of 18,600
acres, a shoreline of 285 miles, and a drainage basin of 1,470,000 acres.
Approximately  400  feet  upstream  from  the  main  dam is a temperature
control weir that allows the  withdrawal  of  epilimnetic  water  that is
warmer and higher in DO than the release of the hypolimnetic waters.

     Uses.    The  uses  of  the  reservoir  consist  of   flood control,
hydropower generation,  water  supply,  fish  and  wildlife conservation,
recreation, and  incidental navigation  for the Missouri River during low
flow periods.  The  power  installation  consists  of  two  turbines, one
31,000 kW reversible and one 27,000 kW conventional.

     Water Quality  Conditions.  When the reservoir is not stratified, or
when the thermocline-oxycline are below the temperature control  weir, no
water quality  problems are experienced in the releases during hydropower
generation.  However, if the thermocline-oxycline  is above  the level of
the temperature control weir, as has been observed from July through mid-
September, poor quality water is pulled over the weir and released during
power generation.   This occurs until sufficient force flexes the thermo-
cline downward, resulting in mostly epilimnetic  water being  pulled over
the weir.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.   The problem of poor water quality
releases at power generation  start-up is  currently being  studied.  One
alternative being considered is a hydraulic or pneumatic destratification
system for  the mini-lake  area between  periods of  generation, and also
when  minimum  releases  are  being  made and the tainter gates cannot be
used.

Fort Patrick Henry Reservoir and Dam
Operating  Agency:  Tennessee Valley Authority

     Location.  Fort Patrick Henry  Dam  is  located  on  the  South Fork
Holston River at river mile 8.2, near Kingsport in northeast Tennessee.

                               IV-23

-------
     Principal Features.    The reservoir is 54,900 feet in length and has
a maximum depth of 80 feet.  At normal  maximum pool  the  reservoir has an
area of  872 acres,  a volume  of 26,900 acre-feet,  and a shoreline of 37
miles.  The drainage area at the dam is 1,220,000 acres.    The South Fork
Holston  is  a  highly  developed  watershed  with three major reservoirs
located upstream from the dam.

     Uses.  The reservoir  is primarily  used for  hydropower production.
The rated  capacity for power production is 36 MW, produced by two Kaplan
turbines.     Significant  secondary   uses  of   the  reservoir  include
recreation,  fish  and  aquatic  life,   water  supply,   and  assimilative
capacity.  A trout  fishery was  created four  miles downstream  from the
dam, at  which point  a thermal  load is  added to  the river  by a large
chemical plant that predates the dam.

     Water Quality Conditions.   Hydropower  releases  from  Fort Patrick
Henry Dam  have low  DO concentrations.  Dissolved oxygen was less than 6
mg/1 for about 102 days each year, less than 5 ing/1  for 62 days  and less
than 4  mg/1 for  25 days.  Periodically, the DO has reached 3 mg/1.  The
releases naturally aerate from 3 mg/1 to about 4 mg/1 within 5  miles and
to about 5 mg/1 within 10 miles.

     The reach  of South  Fork Holston River below Fort Patrick Henry Dam
and the upper reach of the Holston River receive waste from 13 industries
and the  city of Kingsport.  The quantity of waste discharged exceeds the
natural capacity of the river, and several  dischargers  provide treatment
beyond best practicable.   The reduced DO conditions of the dam contribute
to the low assimilative capacity of  these reaches.    Lack  of sufficient
streamflow was  one limiting  factor for future growth and development in
the Kingsport area.

     The principal  discharger  to  the  South  Fork  Holston  River, the
Tennessee Eastman  Company, contracted  with the TVA to provide a minimum
daily release of 750 ftVsec for supply purposes.  This flow is therefore
available for assimilative capacity purposes.

     Although DO  concentrations are  seasonally low  in the Fort Patrick
Henry Reservoir,  the primary  focus of  low DO  concern has  been in the
Moisten River  below Kingsport,  downstream from the dam.  At this point,
the DO has been observed to be 3 mg/1 during concurrent low  flows on the
North and South Forks of the Holston.

     Mi ti gati on/Enhancement Measures.   From  December 1983  to May 1985,
the TVA participated in a joint study with  EPA, the  State of Tennessee,
and major  industrial dischargers  from Kingsport to assess current water
quality conditions and  evaluate  the  cost-effectiveness  of  various DO
improvement  strategies.    Modeling  results of the river indicated that
flow in the North and South  Forks had  the greatest  effect on  DO below
Kingsport, and  the natural aeration, photosynthesis, and respiration had
the next  greatest  impacts.    Several  DO  improvement  strategies were
simulated  and  their  cost-effectiveness  determined.  It was found that

                                IV-24

-------
using supplemental  evening flow  pulses could  produce DO concentrations
beyond that achievable with  more traditional  treatments, even treatment
facilities upgraded  to zero  waste discharges.   The evening flow pulses
use hydro power generation of varying durations, each strategically timed
to arrive at the DO sag to relieve low DO caused by plant respiration and
wasteloads during  the early  morning hours.   Aeration  of the releases,
instream  aeration,  and  combinations  of the three strategies were also
found to be effective strategies.

     A  two-year  pulsing  demonstration  was  to  begin  in  June  1986.
However, at that time Fort Patrick Henry Dam would be required to provide
additional flow, on a regular basis, to meet new permit  requirements for
sustained  flow  past  John  Sevier  Fossil-Fired  Power  Plant.   It was
therefore required to increase minimum pulsing  from six  one-hour pulses
per day to as many as 12 pulses per day, depending on the North Fork flow
and the number of  units operating  at the  power plant.   This indicated
that  the  DO  improvement  due  to the flow requirement would exceed the
improvement expected (1 mg/1) in the reservoir releases demonstration.

     With  implementation  of  the   power   plant   permit,  significant
improvements  have  been  achieved  ^n  DO concentrations downstream from
Kingsport.  Additional field studies  and  modeling  have  confirmed this
improvement.   The frequency and duration of outages of one or more units
of the power plant will be  evaluated  to  determine  if  any incremental
pulsing plan  could be  performed, through the Reservoir Release Program,
to provide any additional treatment.
SEDIMENT MOVEMENT

Lake Red Rock and Dam
Operating Agency:  Corps of Engineers

     Location.  Lake Red Rock is  located  on  the  Des  Moines  River in
south-central Iowa approximately 60 miles downstream of Des Moines, Iowa.

     Principal  Features.    Lake  Red  Rock is approximately 42,200 feet
long, with a storage capacity of  90,000  acre«feet,  a  surface  area of
6,300 acres, and a drainage area of 4,160,000 acres.  It has a 7-day mean
residence time.   The  lake was  impounded in  1969.   Agriculture is the
predominate land  use in the watershed, however, significant point-source
loadings to  the Des  Moines River  occur upstream  near the  city of Des
Moines.

     Uses.    Lake  Red  Rock  is  a  Corps  of  Engineers  flood control
reservoir.  It also provides recreation.

     Water Quality Conditions.   The  Des  Moines  River,  in  general, is
highly turbid, nutrient rich, and high in dissolved and suspended solids.
The high suspended solids load   contributed  to  the  lake,  coupled with
reductions in  velocity in the  broad headwater area, have resulted in the
deposition of large  quantities  of  sediment  and  the  formation  of an

                               IV-25

-------
extensive submerged  delta.   Sediment accumulation varies longitudinally
and laterally within the lake, with the greatest amounts occurring in the
headwater area  and the  submerged river delta.  Data collected from 1968
to 1976 revealed that the submerged delta extended  approximately 3 miles
into  the  lake  from  the  inflow  point  and covered about 2,200 acres.
Depths of deposition in the old river channel  ranged from  4 feet  at the
dam to 20 feet at the lake headwater.  The distribution of sediments also
has impaired the use of the lake for recreational  boating.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.  In 1979, the  permanent pool level
was raised  to elevation  728 to compensate for conservation storage lost
to sediment accumulation.   As of  1985, more   than 39,000  acre*feet had
accumulated  below  elevation  725,  occupying  about  45  percent of the
storage originally reserved for the 100-year project life.  An additional
33,000 acre«feet  had been  deposited between  elevation 725 and elevation
780, the top of the flood control pool,  resulting in  a loss  of about 4
percent of the total flood control storage.  The current estimate for the
sedimentation rate is approximately 3,500 acre-feet per year,  about four
times the original estimate.

     The  Rock  Island  District  of  the Corps of Engineers is currently
studying a permanent increase in the conservation  pool level to elevation
742  to  provide  400,000  acre«feet  of  combined  sediment/conservation
storage.  This  proposal  would  decrease  flood  control  storage  by 20
percent.   However, it  would not prohibit controlling the project design
flood.  Implementation of this proposal is contingent  upon completion of
environmental analyses,  public coordination,   and approval  of a revised
water control plan.
THERMAL CHANGES

Flaming Gorge Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Bureau of Reclamation

     Location.  Flaming Gorge  Dam  is  located  on  the  Green  River in
northeastern Utah,  about 32  river miles  downstream of the Utah-Wyoming
border.

     Principal Features.  The reservoir  is  475,000  feet  long,  with a
maximum depth  of 440  feet, an active capacity of 3,516,000 acre-feet, a
surface area of 42,000 acres, and a 375-mile  long shoreline.   It drains
an  area  of  approximately  11,300,000  acres.  The dam was completed in
1962.

     Uses.   Flaming Gorge  Reservoir is  a major  unit of  the Bureau of
Reclamation's Colorado  River Storage  Project.  It is operated primarily
for power production, although it  also  serves  the  purpose  of storing
irrigation water.   The  power plant  is located at the downstream toe of
the dam and it houses three 36-MW generators driven by three Francis-type
turbines.    Reservoir  releases  are made almost exclusively through the
three penstocks, whose intakes are located halfway up the dam.  Hourly

                               IV-26

-------
releases are  determined by the power system loads, and during the summer
months  by  maximum  and   minimum  operating   criteria  for  downstream
recreational uses.

     Water Quality Conditions.  Flaming Gorge is a reservoir, with direct
thermal stratification in the summer,  an  ice  cover  over  most  of the
surface in  the winter,  and periods of complete mixing in the spring and
fall (dimictic).  However, as the reservoir filled in the  late 1960s and
early 1970s,  a chemocline (water quality gradient) developed in the area
immediately behind the dam.  This chemocline was  generally located below
the turbine  intakes at  a depth of about 200 feet, while the thermocline
was usually at a depth of 30 to 35 feet.  The  zone below  the chemocline
did not  mix during  spring and  fall overturns,  and the water was cold,
anoxic,  and  poor  in  quality.      After   the   selective  withdrawal
modifications were  installed in  1978, the chemocline gradually weakened
each year and finally disappeared during the spring overturn of 1982.  It
has not been observed since.

     Water quality on the lower, canyon section of the reservoir is quite
good and  could  be  classified  as  being  relatively  oligotrophic (not
enriched).    A  lake  trout  fishery  had been established.  In the more
upstream section of the reservoir toward the tributary  inflow areas, the
trophic status  becomes mesotrophic  and finally  eutrophic in the summer
months in both the Black's Fork  and  Green  River  arms.    Summer algal
blooms are common in these warm water reaches.

     After  closure   of  Flaming   Gorge  Dam,  the  downstream  aquatic
environment of the Green  River changed  radically.   Temperatures before
dam closure ranged from 32°F to about 67°F.  High runoff flows with heavy
sediment loads occurred  in  late  May  and  June.    After  dam closure,
temperature  fluctuations  were  reduced  to  a range of 39°F in March to
about 50°F in November.  Flows were stabilized  to a  power demand cycle.
Sediment loads  were reduced, as reflected in a drop in turbidity values,
from 5,000 Jackson Turbidity Units to around 60 Jackson Turbidity Units.

      The biota also changed.  Indigenous  fish species  were replaced by
rainbow trout  in the 26 miles below the dam.  This sport fishery quickly
became a valuable recreational resource for the State of Utah.   However,
as the reservoir filled and stratified, the penstocks began to draw water
from deeper and colder strata, reducing summer water  temperatures in the
tailwater area  below the  range necessary  to maintain a self-sustaining
trout fishery.   By the mid-1970s, trout production in this  area declined
markedly.

     Mitigation/Enhancement  Measures.    The Bureau of Reclamation, with
the cooperation of the Utah Division of Wildlife  Resources and  the U.S.
Fish and  Wildlife Service,  investigated various  methods of controlling
reservoir discharges in order to raise  downstream temperatures  to allow
the growth  and production  of the  trout fishery.  As a result, shutter-
type  selective  withdrawal  structures  were  retrofitted  to  the three
penstock intakes.   The structures are square towers, each about 200 feet
high, with a series of four shutters along the length of one  side.  They

                                IV-27

-------
effectively extended  the penstock  intakes vertically upward into higher
and warmer reservoir  strata  so  that  warmer  water  could  be released
downstream.   The shutters are raised and lowered by hoists on the dam to
selectively withdraw water of a given  temperature.    Modification of the
penstock intakes was completed in 1978.

     The selective  withdrawal modification was successful  in meeting the
fishery water temperature criteria    downstream.    Fish  production and
condition improved.   A  large increase in numbers of fish  food organisms
in the tailwaters was also noted.  Other benefits included  fewer cases of
hypothermia among  river runners and an upstream movement of warmer water
fish communities.
NEUTRAL OR POSITIVE EFFECTS

McCloud Reservoir and Dam
Operating Agency:  Pacific Gas and Electric Company

     Location.  The McCloud  Dam  is  located  on  the  McCloud  River in
northern California.

     Principal Features.    The  McCloud Reservoir has a gross capacity of
35,200 acre-feet, and a  surface area  of 520  acres.   The drainage area
covers  approximately  269,000  acres  and  is  primarily used for timber
production and recreation.  The dam was completed in 1965.

     Uses.   The  McCloud Dam's  primary use  is to  supply water  to the
James B. Black hydroelectric powerhouse.  Up to 2,000 ftVsec is diverted
through approximately 11  miles of conduit and an intervening reservoir to
the powerhouse, producing 172 MW at normal operating capacity.

     Water Quality  Conditions.   Mud Creek,  a tributary  to the McCloud
River near the upper end  of the reservoir, carries a significant sediment
load originating  from the  Konwakiton Glacier.  Before the dam was built
in 1965, elevated turbidity levels  resulting  from  this  glacial runoff
occurred  from  midsummer  to  late  fall or winter, depending on weather
conditions.

     A water quality study was  performed  by  Pacific  Gas  and Electric
Company  due  to  concerns  of resource management agencies regarding the
effect of dam releases on levels of turbidity  and temperature downstream
of the  reservoir.   The  water  quality data  indicate that the reservoir
appears to act as a settling basin for  a large  portion of  the material
that drains  to it.  Turbidity of release water is generally much reduced
from the levels  that  would  have  occurred  if  the  dam  had  not been
constructed.    Although   high  sediment  inputs  from  Mud  Creek  cause
turbidity levels and total  suspended solids  to increase  throughout the
reservoir, the  majority  of  the material  that flows  into the reservoir
remains near the bottom.
                               IV-28

-------
     The  study   also  concluded  that  the  temperature  of  the  river
immediately downstream of the McCloud Dam showed little  change from that
of  the  river  upstream  of  the  dam.    The  thermal  structure of the
reservoir, even during seasonal changes in reservoir elevation and inflow
temperatures,  is  such  that  little  negative  effect  on  temperatures
downstream can be expected as long as mid to lower  elevation intakes are
used as  sources of  water for  downstream releases.  Reservoir data also
indicate that DO concentrations will remain above standards necessary for
the maintenance  of aquatic  life.  This applies regardless of the intake
elevation used for downstream release.

     Mitigation/Enhancement Measures.  No mitigation/enhancement measures
are necessary.
SUM1ARY

     The fifteen  case studies  illustrate several  water quality effects
and some of the implemented and planned mitigation  measures, though they
are not intended to be statistically representative.

     J.  Percy  Priest  Reservoir,  Old  Hickory Lake, Richard B. Russell
Lake, Upper  Bear Creek  Reservoir, Casitas  Lake, and  Lake Cachuma were
presented  as  case  studies  of  low  hypolimnetic  DO  and/or increased
concentrations of iron and manganese in  the hypolimnion  and tailwaters.
(Old  Hickory  Lake  does  not  have  elevated concentrations of iron and
manganese.)  These effects are greatly  facilitated  in  each  case  by a
seasonal stratification  of the impoundment.  Aeration of the impoundment
or  tailwaters  and  selective  withdrawal  were  reported  as successful
mitigative efforts.

     Guntersville  Reservoir,  Boone  Reservoir,  and Eau Galle Lake were
presented  as  examples  of   eutrophication,   with   phytoplankton  and
macrophytes  causing  problems.    Herbicide  treatments, introduction of
grass carp, and hypolimnetic application of  aluminum sulfate  to control
internal  phosphorus  recycling  are  some  of  the  mitigation  measures
applied.  Watershed management - including best management  practices for
nonpoint  source  and  point  source  controls - is becoming increasingly
important for reducing eutrophication.

     Norris Reservoir, Mark Twain Lake, and Fort Patrick  Henry Reservoir
are given  as case  studies of  flow regulation and/or reaeration denial.
In these  cases, management  of low  flows is  an important  issue.   Flow
regulation  weirs  and  operational  changes  are  among  the  mitigative
measures employed.

     Lake Red Rock and Flaming Gorge Reservoir were  provided as examples
of  a  sediment  accumulation  problem  and  a  cold  tailwater  problem,
respectively.  The former  has primarily  been mitigated  by altering the
operational philosophy,  while the  cold discharges  have been reduced by
selective withdrawal.
                               IV-29

-------
     Finally,  McCloud Reservoir was included to demonstrate that not only
do some impoundments not have any  water quality  problems, but  they may
actually improve  water quality.   In  this case,  the reservoir tends to
reduce downstream turbidities caused by high sediment loads  generated by
a glacier.

     All mitigative  measures employed  in the case studies were reported
to be successful to  some extent.   In  some cases,  several seasons were
required to  completely see  their effect,  and in other cases, more than
one measure was needed to rectify poor water quality conditions.   In all
cases  where  improvements  in  water  quality  conditions have occurred,
there have been significant measurable benefits to either  the public, in
terms   of   improved   fishing   conditions   and   other   recreational
opportunities, or to  dischargers,  in  terms  of  increased assimilative
capacity.
                                IV-30

-------
                         V.  MITIGATION MEASURES
      This chapter identifies major mitigation  measures  that can be used
to  address  the  adverse water  quality effects  associated  with  certain
impoundments.     Mitigation  is   also  discussed  in  specific  situations
associated with  the  case  studies presented in Chapter IV.   Because each
reservoir system is  unique, the  applicability  of specific  mitigation
measures must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.  This evaluation must
consider the effects  that  need  to be corrected, the present uses of the
reservoir  system,   as  well   as   the  benefit-cost  relationship  of  the
mitigation measures.   Due to  the complexity of  the  reservoir-tailwater
system,  mitigation  measures  have  to  be  carefully  evaluated  before
implementation.  Implementation of more than one measure may be necessary
to  improve  or maintain the  water quality  in a  reservoir  system.   The
application  of one measure may correct  one  adverse effect, but create or
intensify another  water  quality  effect.    For  example,  reaeration  of
releases to  increase DO may cause a problem with nitrogen supersaturation
(TVA, 1978).  While mitigation measures are intended to minimize or prevent
certain undesirable water  quality effects, they themselves  sometimes cause
other adverse environmental  effects.   For  example,  gaining access to the
impoundment  to implement a mitigation measure may  require  cutting a road
through a wetland.   Another example might be a mitigation measure intended
to control algae growth which also causes fish mortality.

      When considering the appropriateness of specific mitigation measures,
most operating agencies must  insure that  authorized project  purposes are
met.   If the selected  mitigation measure  negatively affects  or restricts
authorized project  purpose(s), its implementation often cannot be justified
without  a  modification to  the  authority,  regardless  of its  potential
positive effect on water quality.

      Mitigation measures  can be  divided  into  three broad categories:
physical  measures,   operational  measures,   and  structural  modification.
Physical measures include technologies that require specific processes or
equipment to be used to correct the problem.  Physical mitigation measures
include the control of water quality in the reservoir, selective withdrawal
of reservoir water  with acceptable water quality,  aeration  of reservoir
releases, and habitat modification.  Operational measures include changes
to  the  present  operating  regime of  the  reservoir system.   Operational
measures  include maintaining a  minimum discharge, limiting  the maximum
discharge flow,  and  altering  the rule curves  for  reservoir operations as
well as selective withdrawal.  Structural modifications involve changes to
the structure of the dam  and/or  its outlet works;  examples  would be the
addition of  ports,  gates,  vents,  or weirs to modify  the depth or manner in
which water  is selectively withdrawn from the reservoir.

                                   V-l

-------
      The measures in this chapter are grouped  according  to whether they
primarily affect the pool, affect the tailwater, or are of a more general
nature.  Frequently, mitigation measures will have  an  effect on both the
pool and tailwater because of the  complex  interrelationships.   Depending
on  site  specific  circumstances,  all  of,  the  mitigation  measures  are
candidates for retrofit as well  as new construction.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL IN THE RESERVOIR

      Several mitigation measures are available which may be specifically
applied to  improve  water quality in  the  impounded pool.   These include
measures for induced mixing, hypolimnetic aeration, and dredging.


Induced Mixing.

      Induced mixing is  frequently applied  to  stratified impoundments to
mitigate water quality  concerns  related  to stratification such  as  low
hypolimnetic DO,  increased iron and manganese, and  thermal changes.  Mixing
may be induced by the use of low head,  high volume mechanical pumps pushing
epilimnion waters into the hypolimnion or vice  versa (TVA,  1978).  Mixing
may also be  induced by  air  injection  in the hypolimnion, which will tend
to move upward with  the gas  bubbles.   If sufficient air is introduced, the
process may  continue  until   a  stratified  impoundment  experiences  nearly
uniform temperature and DO distributions (Fast, 1979).

      Induced mixing may be  applicable to reservoirs  of any size (USEPA,
1973).   However,  it  is  not always  necessary to  destratify  an  entire
reservoir; only  the area near the  outlet  structure may require mixing.
TVA is experimenting at Douglas Dam with three high-volume, low-speed axial
pumps  just   upstream  from turbine  intakes; the  pumps  force  oxygenated
epilimnetic  water  into turbine  intakes  during stratified  periods  (TVA,
1987a).

      In addition to increasing  DO by the introduction of  air and/or the
movement of  anoxic  hypolimnetic  waters to  the  surface where  they  can be
reoxygenated, mixing can also reduce the occurrence of dissolved iron and
manganese and hydrogen  sulfide that are soluble  under anaerobic conditions.
If  this  occurs,  the  taste  and  odor  characteristics of the  impoundment
waters can be improved.

      Induced mixing may also result  in  increasing  the total energy  (heat)
content of  the water  body  during the  summer  months,  since  the average
temperature  of the  mixed impoundment  will  more closely approximate the
epilimnion temperature before mixing.  If destratification  is successful,
the  cold  hypolimnetic  waters may  be eliminated.   Destratification is
generally considered beneficial  for warm water fish,  since  there is an
                                   V-2

-------
increase  in  their  depth  distribution,  and  therefore, an increase in
available habitat.  An increase in  food supply  is often  observed since
benthic  fauna  production  often  increases greatly during mixing (Fast,
1979).  This is, in part,  a  result  of  reduction  of  barriers  to the
distribution of  fish, zooplankton, benthic fauna, and other biota (Fast,
1979).  However, in some cases, this effect may be undesirable because it
can eliminate  cold water  fish species.  Destratification also increases
the temperature of the water released into the tailwaters.   It therefore
may not  be appropriate where cold water fisheries are supported, but may
support management of warm  water fisheries  that in  the past  have been
impaired by cold water releases of the hypolimnion.

     Destratification,  through  mixing,  is  notably  less  effective in
reducing algal densities and primary production.  It can upwell nutrients
into the euphotic zone and thereby stimulate algal growth.

Aeration of the Hypolimnion.

     Aeration of  the hypolimnion  can be performed with the intention of
mixing, as  described above,  or simply  to provide  additional oxygen to
targeted regions  of an  impoundment.  In reservoirs where the cold water
of the hypolimnion and releases are desirable, but  the water  quality is
poor, aeration  of the  hypolimnion may  be applicable.   Aeration strips
undesirable gases such as carbon dioxide,  hydrogen sulfide,  and ammonia
(Fast, 1979), and lowers the concentration of iron, manganese, phosphorus
and other conditions associated with anaerobic conditions.  Small changes
in  temperature  usually  occur,  but  cold  temperatures are maintained.
Artificial aeration will not affect external  loadings of  nutrients, but
it  may  affect  the  rates  and  directions of nutrient cycling once the
nutrients are in the reservoir, and in cases  where the  internal loading
of nutrients  is significant, aeration may alleviate some of the symptoms
of eutrophication.  It can increase  species diversity  by increasing the
suitable habitat  available for cold water species such as trout, salmon,
zooplankton, and benthic fauna.   Like  mixing,  aeration  is  not always
successful in reducing the algal standing crop.

     Aeration  of  the  hypolimnion  of small water supply reservoirs has
been demonstrated to be effective (TVA,  1978).   However, it  may not be
economical for large reservoirs that are used for power production due to
the large volume of  hypolimnetic  waters  that  is  continually released
through the turbines.  Another drawback of aeration is the possibility of
supersaturation of nitrogen gas occurring in  the hypolimnion  and in the
tailwaters.   Use of pure oxygen gas for aeration is one solution to this
problem.

     Methods that control DO within  the  reservoir  generally  result in
better overall  water quality  than those that only increase DO levels in
the releases.  However, mitigative measures applied in  the reservoir may
not  ensure  a  targeted  concentration  of  DO in the tailwaters and may
require supplemental aeration.    Full-scale  projects  by  the  Corps of
Engineers and  EPA have  demonstrated that one disadvantage of the method
is that DO levels in the  tailwater  releases  cannot  be  regulated very
readily  (TVA,  1978),  and  aeration  of  the  tailwaters  may  still be
necessary.

                                 V-3

-------
Dredging.

     Dredging is  the   only mitigative measure that directly removes the
accumulated  products  of  degradation   from   the   reservoir,  thereby
increasing   depths   and   removing   potentially  recyclable  nutrients
(Peterson, 1979).  Increase  in water  depth is  especially important for
reservoirs  since  they  serve  as  sediment  traps  and therefore become
shallower with time.    Dredging can  remove aquatic  vegetation, which is
especially  important  where  unwanted  species  have invaded a reservoir
system.  It can minimize the role of the sediments in recycling nutrients
and  can  lower  the  oxygen  demand of the sediments by removing organic
matter.  In  Long  Lake,  Michigan,  dredging  was  successfully  used to
improve the fish habitat by increasing lake size and depth and decreasing
the amount of organic sediment (Peterson, 1979).

     The disadvantages  of dredging  relate to  environmental concerns as
well as  economics.   Dredging causes resuspension of bottom sediment and
toxic substances, resolubilization of  chemicals,  and  can  cause oxygen
depletion  by  resuspending  settled  organic  matter.    Resuspension of
sediments may reduce primary  production  rates  due  to  decreased light
penetration in  turbid waters,  and nutrient  levels may  increase due to
cheir  liberation  from  deep  anaerobic  water  areas  during  dredging.
Dredging removes  a large number of benthic organisms and can reduce fish
production by decreasing their food supply and spawning  areas.  Dredging
is costly and requires a disposal site.
WATER QUALITY CONTROL OF TAILWATERS

     Additional   mitigative   measures   are   directly  applicable  for
improvements of water quality in the tail waters.   These measures include
aeration  of  reservoir  releases,  selective  withdrawals,  and  habitat
improvement.

Aeration of Reservoir Releases.

     For a reservoir to discharge water with sufficient DO concentrations
to meet  water quality  standards, aeration  of reservoir releases may be
necessary.    This  has  been  successful  in  tailwaters   that  receive
hypolimnetic waters.   Most  tailwater water quality effects are centered
on dam releases and their oxygen status.

     Under contract to the Corps of Engineers EWQOS program, TVA reported
upon  techniques  for  reaeration  of  hydropower  releases  (CE,  1983).
Although  aeration  may  be  applied  in  the  tailrace   or  immediately
downstream,  TVA   found  that  most  of  the  research  and  development
activities of the prior decade have been directed  toward turbine venting
or aeration in the reservoir itself.  Imbedded within the TVA report is a
translation, from German, of a review  by  Dr.  Peter  Volkart  that also
                                  V-4

-------
deals with turbine venting as well as diffused air, cascade, surface, and
pure oxygen aerators.   Such processes  could play  a role  in situations
where dissolved  oxygen is  needed and  turbine venting is not an option.
Dr.  Volkart  points  out  that  surface  aerators  are  efficient oxygen
transfer devices, which explains their common use in wastewater treatment
applications.

     Turbine venting is a process in which water is aerated  as it passes
through  a   hydroelectric  turbine.    Venting  is  used  not  only  for
oxygenation, but as a  means to  control cavitation  and vibration.   The
process is  one in  which air  is aspirated  or drawn into partial vacuum
regions which occur naturally  or are  created below  the turbine  in the
draft tube.   A  vacuum is created through the installation of baffles or
deflector plates near  vent  holes  which  cause  a  flow  separation and
localized  low  pressure  areas  near  the  vent  openings.    There  are
similarities  between  this  process  and  the  lift  associated  with an
airplane wing  created as air flows over the wing causing a vacuum on the
underside.

     The TVA team (CE, 1983) reported  on turbine  venting in  the United
States and  Europe, including efforts by Duke Power, Alabama Power, Union
Electric, TVA itself, and others.  Various hub baffle schemes retrofitted
as field  modifications to existing turbines are presented and discussed.
Configurations included oxygen diffusers in the  turbine flow, aspiration
into the  draft tube below the turbine wheel, and mechanical injection by
compressors.    As  a  process,  turbine  venting  can  greatly  increase
dissolved oxygen,  and many  schemes may  only be  operated as needed.  A
disadvantage is a slight  drop off  in power  production when  venting is
underway.

     TVA  is  evaluating  a  number of strategies for improving reservoir
releases (TVA, 1987a).    At  Appalachia  Dam,  flow  reversion  from the
powerhouse tunnel  to the  stream reach  below the  dam is being studied.
Turbine baffles or extra aspiration piping are being studied at Cherokee,
Norris, and  South Holston dams.  At Tims Ford, an air compressor is used
to inject air into dam releases.  Turbine pulsing is being tried  at Fort
Patrick Henry  and Norris  Dam; this strategy alternatively increases and
decreases the flows in the reach below the dams.  As part  of these site-
specific   tests   and   evaluations,   TVA   measures  dissolved  oxygen
improvements and considers the associated costs.

Selective Withdrawal of Reservoir Water.

     Thermal stratification of a  reservoir can  allow for  the selective
withdrawal  of   strata  with   the  best  water  quality  for  tailwater
conditions.  For example, a water  level that  contains an  acceptable DO
concentration  and  temperature  could  be  released.  Since the level at
which appropriate water quality conditions may occur changes, multi-level
intake structures  may be necessary.  The success of selective withdrawal
also depends on the required volume  of water  that has  to be discharged
compared  to  the  volume  of  water  available  in each strata.  Fishery
problems can arise when the volume of cold water released  in a reservoir

                                 V-5

-------
runs out  in mid-summer  and warm  water must suddenly be released.  This
situation precludes support of both cold water and  warm water fisheries.
Construction of  multi-level intake  structures may  be too expensive for
existing dams in comparison to the benefits that will be achieved.  It is
possible  to  predict  the  water  quality  and  hydraulic  effects  that
selective withdrawals may have  on  reservoir  waters  using mathematical
models to determine if such expense is warranted.

     Submerged weirs have been used to allow only well-oxygenated surface
water to pass through power units.  All  submerged weirs  now in  use are
permanent  structures  located  upstream  from  the base of the dam (TVA,
1978).  These structures  are not  well-suited for  reservoirs whose pool
levels  fluctuate  considerably.    The  crest  of  the weir must be at a
relatively low depth to allow water to pass over it  during all  times of
the  year.    Hypolimnetic  waters  can  then pass over the weir when the
reservoir is at normal operating levels during the summer (TVA, 1978).

Habitat Improvement of Tailwaters.

     Tailwater  management  to  support  fisheries  is  a  relatively new
science developed  over the  past thirty  years.   The first  time it was
noted that warm water species of fish did not reproduce  below a  dam was
in 1943 (Pfitzer, 1975).  In the years that followed, this phenomenon was
repeated each time a  high dam  was completed  and discharged  cold water
into  formerly   warm  water  (Pfitzer,  1975).    However,  with  proper
management many tailwaters can support excellent fisheries.

     Tailwaters  otherwise  suitable  for   fisheries,  but   limited  by
inadequate minimum  flow and  low concentrations of DO, might be improved
by  physical  changes  to  the  environment.    One   method  of  habitat
improvement related to the problem of minimum flow is increasing the area
of continuously wet substrate and the extent of reaches with  deep water.
This can  be accomplished  by multiple  rock structures,  small dams, and
wing walls,  which all  result in  formation of  a series  of small pools
separated by reaches of fast, turbulent water.  These structures can also
serve to increase turbulence,  and  therefore  DO.    Unfortunately these
structures  would  not  solve  the  problem  of  low DO during periods of
maximum discharge.

     Another  method  to  improve  the  habitat  of  tailwaters  is  flow
regulation  of   the  discharge   waters.    A  fairly  accurate  habitat
maintenance flow can be determined by studying shoal and riffle  areas at
different  flow  regimes.    There  is  an  ideal minimum flow that would
maximize fisheries (Wiley and Mullen, 1975).   Usually  a compromise flow
is implemented  as a  result of  conflicting needs  of other  uses of the
reservoir.  The problem of control of releases  is also  discussed in the
Operational Changes section.

     The Fish  and Wildlife  Service has developed a detailed methodology
to evaluate habitat (FWS, 1982).   Their method  is termed  the "Instream
Flow  Methodology"  and  is  one  of  the  methods used in Federal Energy
Regulatory  Commission  (FERC)  licensing  proceedings  to  evaluate  the

                                  V-6

-------
downstream  impacts   of  hydroelectric  projects  on  aquatic  habitats.
Physical  changes  to  the  tailwaters  (artificial  spawning  areas) and
operational  changes  are  sometimes  required  to  receive  a license to
generate power.  The method can be applied in a variety of situations.
OTHER MITIGATION MEASURES

     Other mitigation measures of a more  general nature  may be applied.
These measures have the potential for improving water quality in the pool
and tailwaters.  These measures are predominantly of  a management nature
and include watershed management and changes in dam operations.

Watershed Management.

     The  two  major  sources  of  pollutants  entering  a  reservoir are
nonpoint sources and point  sources.   Since adequate  treatment measures
for point  sources of pollution have already largely been installed, this
section will focus on  controlling nonpoint  sources of  pollution in the
watershed.   There are  numerous and divergent sources of nonpoint source
pollution, and each type of source has its  own type  of treatment.   For
example,  sediment  transport  to  a  large reservoir can be dispersed by
smaller upstream impoundments.  Major land uses in the watershed, such as
agricultural, urban  development, and suburban development,  contribute to
nonpoint source pollution in different  ways.    Therefore,   the controls
implemented depend on the watershed land use.

     Watershed management for nonpoint source pollution also requires the
cooperation and interaction of citizens, local governments,  and state and
Federal agencies.   One  mechanism that  has aided  the implementation of
nonpoint source controls has  been the  formation of  watershed districts
that serve  as focal  points for the identification of pollution problems
and for allocating funds for improvements.   For  example, at  White Clay
Lake in  Wisconsin, the  creation of  a Lake  Protection District allowed
local  citizens  the  opportunity  to  assist  in  the   development  and
implementation of  land management  plans (Peterson,  1979).  It can also
help increase the public  awareness  of  the  possible  controls  and the
contribution individuals can make in reducing pollution.

     Watershed  management  for  reservoir  water  quality  is  extremely
important, yet  difficult  to  effectively  institutionalize.   Reservoir
management agencies  often have little or no administrative  or regulatory
responsibility or authority in the watershed.  Thus, they are  faced with
the difficult  task of dealing with the symptoms rather than the cause of
poor water quality.    If  the  water  quality  of  reservoirs  is  to be
adequately managed, greater emphasis must be placed on the development of
cooperative management approaches on a watershed-wide  basis.   This will
often require  interagency cooperation.   An example of this recent level
of concern is the  Chesapeake  Bay  Agreement,  reached  in   1987  by the
governors  of  the  states  with  watersheds  draining into  the Bay.  The
governors formally - and very publicly - agreed  to establish state-wide,
                                 V-7

-------
watershed management programs,  to reduce nutrient inputs to the Bay by 40
percent over the next ten to twenty years.   Improved  quality of  the Bay
is the  overriding goal.   In  a similar  attempt, TVA is also organizing
county-level  activities  designed  to  control  nonpoint  source  inputs
through watershed management.

     One  of  the  most  visually  evident  sources  of  nonpoint  source
pollution is soil erosion,  resulting in  sediment loads  transported to,
and  deposited  in,  reservoirs  and  the  streams  that feed them.  Also
transported along  with  the  sediments  are  solid  mineral  and organic
matter,  and  absorbed  chemicals  such  as  pesticides,  herbicides, and
nutrients.  There are numerous   methods  to  help  control  soil erosion.
Examples include:  limiting the  extent and exposure time of bare ground;
keeping bare ground covered with  mulches  or  protective  matting during
construction  activities;  limiting  construction  to  periods of minimal
precipitation; diverting runoff around exposed areas;  utilizing settling
basins and  silt retaining  fences to  reduce runoff velocity and to trap
suspended sediments; sloping reservoir  banks  to  facilitate vegetation;
seeding  exposed  banks  and  revegetating  banks  with natural trees and
shrubs for erosion and thermal  protection;  and in areas where this is not
possible, installing  rip rap  (USEPA, 1977).  Construction activities in
the watershed can greatly impact  the  sediment  load  to  the reservoir.
Enforcing the  implementation of  the above  measures during construction
activities can greatly reduce erosion.

     Since dissolved pollutants such as nutrients will not  be removed by
the  above  methods,  different  approaches  must  be  utilized for their
control.   Optimum  application  rates  of  pesticides,  fertilizers, and
herbicides, as  well as  timing considerations  are important, along with
suitable  disposal  of  wastes   with  their  application  (USEPA,  1977).
Education of the public in the  proper use of fertilizers, herbicides, and
pesticides can be especially important.  In areas where these impacts are
critical,  regulation  of  the   time  and  extent  of  their  use  may be
necessary.

     Depending on the  location  of  the  reservoir  watershed,  urban or
agricultural  nonpoint  sources  may  be major contributors of pollution.
There are numerous programs already designed to help  farmers control the
loss  of  sediment,  nutrients,  and  chemicals  from  their cropland and
pasturelands.  These are not only effective in controlling pollution, but
also help reduce farming costs  and increase farming efficiency.  Examples
of   agricultural   management    practices   include   contour   farming,
conservation  tillage,  livestock  waste  management  systems,  and  crop
residue management.   There  are also  numerous methods  to control urban
runoff that  either reduce runoff or delay runoff, such as increasing the
extent  of  pervious  areas,  and  ponding  and  detention  measures  for
impervious areas.  Frequently,  however, these options are limited because
the operating  agency  for  a  dam  may  lack  the  authority  and/or the
necessary cooperation to implement these measures.
                               V-8

-------
Operational Changes.

     Water quality  impacts may be lessened by changes in the operational
procedures of a dam.  However, the majority of dams  are not,  and cannot
be,  operated   solely  for   the  purpose  of  achieving  water  quality
objectives.  Conflict of interest can  occur if  water quality objectives
are added  to the  other primary  operational purposes  of the reservoir,
such as flood control or power generation.  The losses due to  changes in
operation for  the primary uses would have to be compared to the benefits
of protecting or enhancing stream uses.

     While the majority of reservoirs are  not operated  for the specific
purpose of water quality, most Corps of Engineers reservoirs are operated
to achieve water quality goals  within  operational  constraints.   Water
control plans  for Corps  of Engineers projects are developed to meet the
authorized  project  purposes.    Deviations  from  these  plans  can  be
accommodated  only  if  there  is  no  adverse  impact  on the authorized
purposes;  otherwise,  additional  authority  is  required.    Most other
involved federal  agencies have similar constraints.  Changing operations
requires justifications and authorizations.

     The requirement to  maintain  a  minimum,  constant  discharge would
greatly  benefit  tailwaters  where  zero discharge occurs periodically.
The advantages of maintaining a minimum flow is that it helps avoid rapid
temperature  fluctuations,  reduces  the  impact of low DO concentrations
through natural aeration in the tailrace, and increases  the continuously
wet surface area of the stream, therefore increasing habitats for benthic
biota and fish.  The drawbacks of this  change in  operation are  that it
causes a  loss in  the flexibility of peak-power operation and a decrease
in power operation efficiency.  Discharges of less than minimums required
to operate  turbines in  power dams  may have to be sluiced, leading to a
complete loss of the  energy potential  of this  water.   Reservoir water
levels may also be affected, adding to the complexity of river management
and flood control (TVA, 1978, 1987a).

     One compromise type minimum flow is a time-volume  release, in which
relatively large  volumes of  water are  released in  short pulses during
periods of otherwise no discharge.  For example, at a  project where two-
or  three-day  periods  of  no-flow  may  frequently  occur from March to
October, a release schedule  could be  adopted that  would allow  a brief
discharge of  perhaps one  full load on one generator.  TVA is evaluating
such turbine  pulsing  (TVA,  1987a).    Such  a  discharge  schedule may
occasionally  result  in  a  minor  loss in total system power production
capability.  The discharge of water following this  schedule would permit
electrical  power  to  be  generated  and  at the same time provide fresh
volumes of cold water in the tailwater (Pfitzer, 1975).

     Limiting discharge to a certain maximum  flow reduces  impacts on DO
during the period of low concentrations in the discharges through natural
aeration in the tailwaters.  This method involves  a loss  of flexibility
in peak-power  generation and may place unacceptable constraints on flood
control operations (TVA, 1978).
                              V-9

-------
     VI. FEDERAL AGENCIES' WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS
INTRODUCTION

      This chapter  presents  the results  of  assessments by the  Corps  of
Engineers  (COE),  Tennessee  Valley Authority  (TVA),  and  the Bureau  of
Reclamation (USBR)  of  water  quality at their  impoundments.   These three
agencies  specifically  requested  that they   be  allowed  to  contribute
individual  assessments of  the  dams  they  manage.    None  of the  other
commenters offered similar assessments.

      Water impoundments operated by these three Agencies represent a wide
variety of geography,  climate,  and  operational  situations.   COE  dams are
concentrated  in  the industrialized areas of  the Southeast and  the Ohio
River  Basin,  coastal   areas,  the Pacific Northwest,  and  along  mainstem
navigable rivers.  TVA dams are located in a well-developed and partially
industrialized extended river basin.  USBR dams are located solely in the
17 western states and Hawaii.  These Agencies were invited to prepare their
Agency  assessments  as  a supplement   to this   Report  to  Congress  in
recognition  of  the importance  of regional   effects  and  site-specific
characteristics  on  dam water  quality.    The  original  submittals  by the
Agencies are provided in the  appendices (Appendix  F, COE; Appendix G, TVA;
and Appendix  H,  USBR).   These original submittals  provide the following
information specific to each  Agency's  area of interest:

      (1)   Statement of policies and procedures  followed by the agency in
            the development and management of water resources.

      (2)   Assessment of water quality with respect to the agency's dams.


      The three  Agencies adopted  a questionnaire developed  by  Kennedy,
Gunkel,  and  Gaugush   of  the  U.S. Army  Corps   of  Engineers  Waterways
Experiment Station (WES) at Vicksburg,  Mississippi, as a uniform instrument
for collecting dam-related water  quality  information  on their respective
projects.   A copy  of  the questionnaire  tailored  to  the  USBR,  with its
instruction sheet, is attached as Appendix I.

      Basically,   the  questionnaire  presents  field  personnel   with  a
comprehensive  list  of  water  quality  attributes.   They  were  asked  to
subjectively rate each attribute in the tributary, pool, and tailwater of
each  reservoir on  the basis  of  the extent  to which this  attribute  is  a
problem, the  level  of  impact of the attribute on user  benefits,  and the
reliability of the data upon which  the  rating  is  being  made.   A  computer
program, also developed at WES, compiles the data from the questionnaires
into a SAS data  file.   Statistical  analyses can  then  be performed on the
various attributes and their  ratings using the SAS software.  In  the

                                   VI-1

-------
short time allowed for this study, the three Agencies limited their efforts
to frequency analyses of each attribute's extent  and  impact  in the pools
and tail waters of their reservoirs.

      The Agencies  feel  the limited  analysis  presented herein  gives  an
accurate  picture  of the known extent  of given water  quality conditions
across a broad range of geography, climate, and project operating criteria,
along with an assessment of the  perceived impacts of  these conditions  on
user benefits.  This  information is presented from the point of view  of
field personnel  who are directly responsible for daily dam operations and
the delivery of promised project benefits.

      The remainder of this chapter  contains  summaries  of the results  of
each  Agency's   assessment  of  water  quality  related  to  its  dams  and
recommended research needs,  followed by an overview of the data presented.
Material submitted by the Agencies has been incorporated directly into this
chapter.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Background.

      The Corps  of  Engineers  has constructed and now  operates  more than
700 water resource  projects having  a  total  surface  area of nearly 10,000
square miles.  The geographic distribution of these projects, as depicted
in Figure VI-1,  reflects regional differences in water resource development
requirements,  water  control   agency  responsibilities,  and  topographic
requirements  for cost-effective  construction.    Impoundments  providing
navigation benefits, which comprise approximately 26 percent of all Corps
projects, are  located along major  inland  waterways.    These  include the
Mississippi River and  its major  tributaries,  the  Arkansas  and Red Rivers
draining from the west, and  the Ohio and Illinois Rivers draining from the
east.   Other waterways of  importance  include the Alabama  River  and the
Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway in the mid-south, and  the Columbia River in
the northwest.  Twenty-one percent of all projects  are dry dams or projects
which, by design, provide minimal permanent water storage during nonflood
periods.  These  projects are most  prevalent in the  arid southwest, where
flooding conditions are associated with intermittent periods of excessive
runoff, and in the New England states.

      Reservoir projects providing  short- and long-term storage of water,
but not navigation benefits, comprise the remaining 53 percent of all COE
water resource projects.  These projects can be broadly categorized based
on reservoir morphometry and tributary type.   Deep, storage reservoirs are
formed  by  the impoundment  of  higher order  streams  and rivers,  and are
frequently located  in deep, steeply-sloped river valleys.  These projects
tend  to  be  deep,  narrow,  and  highly  dendritic  in  shape.    Mainstem
reservoirs are located on lower order  (i.e.,  larger) rivers  and tend to be
shallower, wider, and  less complex  in shape.
                                    VI-2

-------
FIGURE VI-1. - Geographic distribution of Corps of  Engineers water resource
               projects.
FIGURE VI-2. - Geographic distribution of a ten percent,  stratified, random
               sancle of Corps of Engineers projects for  which questionnaires
               have been received.
                                           VI-3

-------
     Water control   management programs  provide the  means for operating
Corps'  projects to  meet their authorized  purposes.    Most of  the Corps'
projects  are  authorized  for  multiple  purposes  (e.g., flood control,
navigation, and recreation),  and  over  60  Corps  of  Engineer projects
include  water   quality  as   an  authorized   project  purpose.    Flow
augmentation for industrial  and municipal pollution   abatement, acid mine
drainage abatement, and other purposes which relate  to water quality, are
often included in flood control and  navigation projects.   Water quality
management  objectives   have  been   developed  for   each  project  and
incorporated into Corps water control programs wherever possible.

COE Water Quality Assessment.

     For the purposes of  this report,  information  was  obtained through
the  use  of  a  questionnaire designed to solicit information concerning
project design, operation, and water quality status.   The questionnaires
were completed  by COE personnel familiar with each  project and its water
quality characteristics.  With regard to water quality status, subjective
responses  to  questions  concerning  water  quality  were requested.  In
general, these responses  indicated  the  presence  or  absence  of water
quality problems.   In  situations where  problems were indicated, graded
responses allowed assessment of  the  severity  of  the  problem  and the
quality of the information upon which the assessment was based.  To date,
questionnaires for approximately 470 of 700 projects have  been completed
and compiled.

     Since questionnaires for all projects have not  yet been completed, a
sample of questionnaires was randomly drawn and analyzed  by the  COE for
the purpose  of this  report.   The sample size was  set at 10 percent (46
projects), and samples were  drawn  from  strata  based  on  project type
(reservoir, lock  and dam, and dry dam) and COE District.  The geographic
locations of sampled projects are presented in Figure VI-2 for comparison
with the  distribution of  all projects (Figure VI-1).  Results presented
below are based on these analyses.

     Figures VI-3 and VI-4 present the water quality status of tailwaters
and  pools  associated  with  the  sampled  projects,  respectively.    A
shortcoming of the data upon which  these figures  are based  is the fact
that reliable  information concerning water quality status is lacking for
approximately 40 to 50 percent  of  the  projects.    Thus,  a  degree of
uncertainty   and/or   bias   exists   for   data   discussed  here,  and
extrapolations of data compiled for the sampled COE  projects to  all COE
projects  are  not  possible.    The  data do, however, provide a general
assessment of  the types  of water  quality concerns  associated with COE
water resource  projects and  some indication  of their relation to other
project attributes.

     As depicted in Figure VI-3, approximately 60 to 65 percent  of those
sampled projects  for which  evaluations of  the water  quality status of
tailwaters were available  were  considered  not  to  exhibit problematic
conditions.    For  those  projects   indicated  as exhibiting problematic
conditions, several  categories of  water quality  concerns are apparent.

                               VI-4

-------
                          o
                          o
                              te
                              0.
                           CM
Q

O
                                         s
                                         LLJ

                                         CO
                                         O
                                         QC
                                         Q.

                                         O
                                         Z
O
CO

o
o
o
                                         H
                                         Z

                                         I-
                                         H

                                         S
                                         QC
                                         UJ
                                         O
                                         QC
                                         Z
                                         o
                                     111

                                     X
                                     111
                                              c
                                              o
                                              C
                                              O
                                             O
     rt
     3
     O
     3 W
     O >-
     O 0)



     M- 5
     o =
     IS
     D-O
     0)
     uI-E
     CO
                                              0)
VI-5

-------
                          o
                          o
                          LO
n
                            O
                                             c
                                             o
                                            o
rt
3
O
k_
,£

     is
     crO
     
-------
Most prevalent are concerns related to flow, the release of waters low in
dissolved  oxygen  concentration,  and  the  erosion   and  transport  of
sediment.

     Extremes in flow and/or excessive changes in flow, which result from
operational  procedures  required  to  meet  authorized  project purposes
(e.g.,  flood  control,  power  generation,  etc.), may impact downstream
uses.

     Flow fluctuation, although not a water quality problem per se, is an
important factor  affecting water  quality and  use in tailwaters, and is
frequently a key water quality management  issue.   Flow-related problems
for tailwaters include higher than normal flows following flood events as
retained flood  waters  are  released,  lower  than  normal  flows during
periods  when  pool  storage  is  being increased, and daily fluctuations
resulting from the operation of hydropower  facilities, particularly when
power is produced to meet peak-load requirements.

     The  loss  of  dissolved  oxygen  in  the  hypolimnia  of reservoirs
potentially results in direct and indirect  impacts for  tailwaters.  For
projects   which,    because   of   their   structural   or   operational
characteristics, do not allow  for complete  reaeration of  release water
as, dissolved oxygen concentrations below saturation may occur throughout
part or all of the summer  stratified  season.    Such  is  the  case for
approximately one-third  of the  COE projects inventoried here.  However,
the COE notes that  only  one  of  the  46  sampled  projects experiences
periodically severe dissolved oxygen conditions in its tailwater and that
this project is  a  newly-filled  reservoir  where  such  occurrences are
predictable and short-lived.

     The occurrence of elevated concentrations of metals and nutrients in
tailwaters is indicated for approximately 30 to 40 percent of the sampled
projects for  which such  evaluations were made.  And, as reported by the
COE, these projects  are  primarily  those  for  which  reduced dissolved
oxygen concentrations were reported.  These projects are also reported to
receive  relatively  high  inputs  of  metals  and  nutrients  from their
surrounding watershed.

     The  transport  of  suspended  sediment  from reservoir to tailwater
and/or the  erosion and  resuspension of  bank and  bed materials impacts
tailwater areas  below approximately 40 to 50 percent of the projects for
which evaluations were provided.  In  most cases,  impacts are  minor and
result  from  increased  turbidity.    In  other  cases,  degradation  of
immediate downstream  areas  is  indicated.    Preliminary  evaluation of
information  by  COE  suggests  that,  while  project  operation  plays a
significant role in the  determination of  release conditions, pronounced
regional patterns  in the  distribution of  such conditions are apparent.
In general,  reservoirs located  in regions  dominated by highly-erodible
soils  experience  higher  inputs  of  suspended sediment and, therefore,
often release turbid waters.
                               VI-7

-------
     An evaluation  of water  quality conditions  in pools, also based on
sampled responses to the questionnaire,  are  presented  in  Figure VI-4.
Most  prevalent  were  problems  related  to  the eutrophication process.
These include excessive nutrient  concentrations,  algal   blooms, reduced
water clarity,  macrophyte infestations, and the loss of dissolved oxygen
in  bottom  waters.     Other  conditions  of  concern  include  excessive
concentrations of  reduced iron  and manganese  in bottom waters, and the
accumulation  of  sediment  and  contaminants.    As  was  discussed  for
tailwaters, problematic  conditions were  identified for approximately 40
to 50 percent of the pools  for which  evaluations were  available.  And,
again,  varying   degrees  of  severity  in  problematic  conditions  are
apparent.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Background.

     The TVA system of multipurpose  dams  encompasses  more  than 11,000
miles  of  shoreline  and  940  square miles of surface water (see Figure
VI-5).  Construction was largely  completed  by  the  late  1950's.   The
primary  purposes  of  TVA's  projects are navigation, flood control, and
electrical generation.    The  TVA  system  includes  33  large  dams (29
hydropower and  4 nonpower)  and additional  smaller dams.   Due to their
age, the TVA impoundments are representative of mature reservoirs.

     With the completion of the dam construction program,  TVA has turned
its attention  to managing  the reservoir system and promoting the proper
growth, conservation, and management  of the  agency's natural resources.
As part  of this continuing effort, the TVA Board of Directors authorized
in September 1987 the broadest reassessment in 50 years of  the operating
policies of its dams and reservoirs.  The central issues being addressed
                                VI-8

-------
                                                                 LU
                                                                 J—
                                                                 OO
                                                                 >-
                                                                 OO

                                                                 UJ
                                                                 o
                                                                 C£.

                                                                 o
                                                                 OO
                                                                 LU
                                                                 o;
                                                                 LU
                                                                 oo
                                                                 o
                                                                 0.
                                                                 LU
                                                                 OO
                                                                 OO
                                                                 a:
VI-9

-------
by the study are whether water quality  and  recreation  should  be added as
primary purposes of TVA reservoir operations to the statutory purposes of
navigation, flood control,  and electrical  generation.  The study is being
conducted in accordance with the procedures of the National  Environmental
Policy Act  and  will  determine the long-term policies  that  should direct
TVA efforts in  reservoir system  operations  and  river management into the
next century.   The  current  schedule calls for presentation of  the final
report and Environmental  Impact Statement  and the results of public review
and comment of the recommendations in 1989.

TVA Water Quality Assessment.

      Water quality conditions for reservoirs in the Tennessee Valley were
assessed using  the  approach  applied by the Corps  of Engineers  to assess
its projects.   Thirty-three  projects  were  assessed,  including  all  the
hydropower  projects and  four nonhydro  projects.   Those  projects  not
included are small  projects  for which no data were  available.  The results
are presented in Figures  VI-6 and VI-7  for pools and  Figures VI-8 and VI-9
for tailwaters.

      Water uses were  severely impacted at  several  sites.   Low dissolved
oxygen,  hydrogen  sulfide,  iron,  and  manganese are  considered  to  be at
sufficient  levels   that  the  fishery  at  Upper  Bear Creek  Reservoir is
practically  nonexistent.    Other  reservoir  projects  having  severe  use
impairment are the three  Ocoee River projects where sediment accumulation,
iron,  manganese, turbidity,  and metal contaminants  are adversely impacting
aquatic  life and  recreation, primarily  in Ocoee Number  3,   with  less
impairment in Numbers 2 and  1.  Finally, the Nolichucky Reservoir has been
filled  with sediment  to  the point  that  it  is no  longer considered  a
reservoir.

      The results  indicate  that  in reservoir pools  the  most  significant
impacts were pool  level fluctuations and bacteria (about 50 and 30 percent
of the reservoirs, respectively).  The next most significant user impacts
were  turbidity,  algae,  macrophytes,  sediment accumulation,   and  shore
erosion, all of which  occur at  15-20 percent of  the reservoir project).
Minor impacts, occurring at 20 percent or more of the reservoir projects,
were related to the following parameters; iron,  manganese,  low dissolved
oxygen, turbidity, low temperature,  high nutrients  and algae, macrophytes,
sediment accumulation, pool  level fluctuation,  shore erosion,  pH/acidity,
bacteria, and fish parasites.

      Several items worth noting for the analysis on TVA pools are:

      (1)   data on hydrogen sulfide were limited and the results of this
            analysis may change when more data becomes  available;

      (2)   several  parameters   had  high  rates  of  recurrence with  the
            potential to impact  uses in the  future:   i.e., high nutrients,
            sediment accumulation, and shore erosion;
                                   VI-10

-------
                                              <
                                              Q

                                              O
                                              z
                                              HI
                                              _l
                                              m
                                              O
                                              DC
                                              Q.
                                        S\

                                        V
                                        V
                                              <
                                              °
                                              °
                                              O
                                              o
I
o
8S
-•i
o 00 o)

l«2£
Q oc
  2S>
               E •=
                     0

                   0) Q.
                   C/5
                   o .S
                            U_ li.
                                .$275
                                    HI
                                    I-
                                    X
                                    HI
                                                     V>
                                                     C
                                                     o
                                                 c
                                                 o
                                                 o
                                                 >»

                                                 15

                                                 O
                                                 i_
                                                 O
                                                       CO

                                                       "
                                                 o
                                                 C CO

                                                 -2
                                                 »- o

                                                 3°-
                                                 o ±
                                                 00
                                                 >^- v.
                                                 O O
                                                    £.=
                                                     on
                                                     ^
                                                     CD
                   vr-ii

-------
ca>o<<1)<1) -. -;r co co  o
2
•o
               c c
               eo oj
               c c

               E S
               CO <0
               *- *-
               c c
               O O
CO (U

c ro
SS
               r~ f~  o '••'

                *  r  w —
                3 •?. W  m
co
o>

S-3
•= o
                                     «  c
                                     CO  fl,
= «
LL O

^ ui
o^

8|
T3 <
4) =

o OT
m «
CO h.
CQ (0

      ^o
                   O

                  'E
            O
            O
                  0)

                  CO
u. u_


u) in
VL iZ
(0 CO
.Si 75
£5
                                                                           <

                                                                           <
                                                                           Q
                                                                           U
                                                                           <
                                                                           Q.
                                                                           5


                                                                           O
                                                                           z
                                                                     I
                                                     DC

                                                     O
                                                                          tu
                                                                          LU

                                                                          V)
                                                O
                                                <
                                                Q.
                                                                O

                                                                v.
                                                                O
                                                                0)
                                                                O
                                                               cc
                                                                O
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     <0
                                                                                     *- CO

                                                                                     03  II
                                                                                     0) O
                                                                                     (0 O
                                                                                     DO.
                                                               a:
                                                               Z3
                                                               C3
                               VI-12

-------
   i .2 .2  3  3 E ~

   IJ- "- "•  OB  03 « O
              »_  k. H- CO
    $ £ D) CD  CD
    O  O) C  Q. Q.
h-   i  •- •=  c  c ;= «
   —*  T **  C  E c CD
          2  0)  CD C >
                                               <
                                               Q

                                               O
                                               Z
                                               111
                                               _l
                                               m
                                               O
                                               oc
                                               QL
Y////////A
OCCASIONAL
                                              O
                                              cc
                                              I
                                              u
                                          Z
                                          HI
                                          I-
                                          X
                                          UJ
                                                          CO
                                                          c
                                                          o
                                                                                                   c
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                  o
                                                          CO

                                                          a
                                                          i_
                                                          o
                                                          
-------
ij*>5l
s   = H°x-
™   0)    -^ CO
S   O)      3
    2      o
    •o      .E
ooo^£"°S£o~coa>oO r •£ CD w w
!Tirir23|=£2--S o>S/55 ^ -o cB £ ® ®
^"•^SS^Sllsl^loOo^Jgu.".
$£0)0)0)    ££33  CLmT3.E S-S-^^SStSz  2£TfflJ?-S-S
0) 0)
Q. CL

E E
0) 0)
O O)

Jsi
    *- _>


    3 tn
    O CO
CO CO

£c w
o o
o o
     ^ ° CO
o-cSSS

-••i.  *££
                        g   CL


                        £ CO

                        CO .«
                            CO CO

                            .S2 75

                            CO £
                            0)5
                                          <
                                          o
                                          u
                                          <
                                          Q.
                                         O
                                         Z
                                      I
                                                      cc
                                                      O
                                       o
                                       <
                                       Q.
                                                             O
                                                             w
                                                             0)
                                                             DC

                                                     c
                                                     0)
                                                0)
                                                  II
                                                o
                                                (0 0)
                                                °-^
                                                c ®

                                                -
                                                CD
               VI-14

-------
     (3)  low dissolved oxygen seasonally occurred in about 70 percent of
          the reservoirs, but user impacts were considered minor for most
          projects   because   the   condition   was  restricted  to  the
          hypolimnion or bottom waters of the reservoir; and

     (4)  more data are needed on organics and metals in fish flesh.

     For  reservoir  tailwaters,  the  results  indicate  that  the  most
significant impacts resulted from low dissolved oxygen,  streamflow (high,
low, and fluctuating), and low temperature.  The next most  frequent user
impacts   were   associated   with  iron,  manganese,  hydrogen  sulfide,
turbidity, metal contaminants,  streambank  erosion,  bacteria,  and fish
parasites.   All of  these parameters  occurred at about 15-20 percent of
the projects.  It  should be  noted that  the questionnaire  approach for
this  assessment  did  not  differentiate  between  the  significance  of
physical and chemical  parameters;  therefore,  it  did  not  reveal that
chemical problems  generally have more serious impacts on uses.  The most
frequent minor impacts, occurring at 20 percent or more of  the projects,
were  related  to  the  following  parameters:    low  dissolved  oxygen,
turbidity,  high   flow,   fluctuating   flow,   low   temperature,  high
temperature, fluctuating  temperature, streambank  erosion, and parasites
in fish.
                                VI-15

-------
THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

Background.

     The Bureau  of Reclamation of the U.S.  Department of the Interior is
responsible for the development  and conservation  of the  Nation's water
resources in  the western United States and  Hawaii.   In most areas of the
17 western states, which  constitute the  main area   served by  the USBR,
less  than  20  inches  of  moisture  fall   each  year.  However, several
important rivers, fed mainly by the melting  snow packs in  the mountains,
flows through these states.  A basic function of USBR is to harness these
streams and to store their surplus  waters in  times of  heavy runoff for
later use  when the  natural flow is low.   USBR water impoundment project
purposes cover  a wide  range of  interrelated functions.   These include
providing  municipal  and  industrial  water  supplies; hydroelectric power
generation; irrigation water for agriculture; water   quality improvement;
flood  control;   river  regulation   and  control;    fish  and  wild'Mfe
enhancement; and outdoor recreation.

     Reclamation project facilities in  operation  during  1986 included:
349 storage  reservoirs; 50 hydroelectric power plants; 288 circuit miles
of transmission lines; 15,804 miles of canals; 1,382  miles of pipelines;
276 miles  of tunnels;  37,263 miles of laterals; 17,002 miles of project
drains; 240 pumping plants; and 254  diversion dams.   Over  20.5 million
people receive  municipal and industrial water, 13.8 million kilowatts of
installed hydroelectric power capacity exists, nearly 10 million acres of
western  farm  land  receive  full  or  supplemental irrigation, and 53.2
million visitor days of recreation are recorded annually.
                                 VI-16

-------
     Completed water  service facilities  are transferred  to local  water
user  organizations  for  operation  and  maintenance  as  soon   as  the
organizations become  capable of assuming these functions.   USBR operates
and maintains hydroelectric  power  plants  and  some  water  storage and
supply works on multipurpose projects.
USBR Water Quality Assessment.

     Information  on  water  quality  conditions and user impacts for all
USBR storage reservoirs and tail waters was solicited by  distributing the
questionnaire to all six Bureau regional offices.  All  regions responded,
and a total  of  250  questionnaires  were  returned.    The geographical
distribution of  this response  by state is shown in Figure VI-10.  Since
there are approximately 349 USBR storage reservoirs in   17 western states
and Hawaii, this response represents nearly 72 percent  of the total.

     Information obtained on the frequency of occurrence of various water
quality conditions in USBR reservoirs and their impact  upon user benefits
are  summarized  in  Figures  VI-11  and  VI-12, respectively.  Tailwater
conditions and their  impacts  are  shown  in  Figures   VI-13  and VI-14,
respectively.

     What is  most immediately  apparent in these four  figures is that in
an average of 54 percent of  the reservoir  cases and  59 percent  of the
tailwater cases,  there are  no data  upon which to make an evaluation of
the conditions or their impact on user benefits.  Water  quality data are
usually only  collected on a particular USBR project when some problem is
noted or suspected, or when some change in the structure  or operation is
contemplated.   Consequently, the  picture of water quality conditions in
Bureau reservoirs and tailwaters  given by  the available  information is
probably somewhat  skewed toward  those situations  where some problem is
perceived or an impact is felt.  The following assessment  is, therefore,
probably conservative.

     USBR data  suggest that  the main conditions affecting user benefits
in Bureau reservoirs are drawdown, pool fluctuation, turbidity, sediment,
and shore  erosion.   These conditions  arise from  the way water storage
reservoirs are operated in an  arid  climate,  where  spring  snowmelt or
winter rains  are the  major source of runoff, and drawdown 1s cofltlmwtrs
throughout the long dry season.   Drawdown was  rated as  having a severe
impact  on  user  benefits  in  six  USBR impoundments, and a significant
impact in 33 others,  out  of  a  total  sample  of  107  reservoirs with
information  available.    Thus,  the cumulative percentage of reservoirs
with data in which drawdown was  rated as  having at  least a significant
impact  on  user  benefits  is  36  percent.    Corresponding  cumulative
percentages  for  the  other  four  conditions  are:    pool  fluctuation
35 percent, turbidity  13 percent, sediment 13 percent, and shore erosion
10 percent.  The last condition,  shore  erosion,  had   no  severe impact
ratings out of a total of 108 impoundments rated.
                              VI-17

-------
                                                                       O

                                                                       3
                                                                       O)
                                                                       CO

                                                                       »*-
                                                                       O
                                                                       Q)

                                                                       i/t
                                                                       I/)
                                                                       
-------
                   <
                   Q
                   UJ
                   _l
                   m
                   o
                   oc
                   Q.

                   O
                   z
I
OCCASIONAL
                         CO
                         c
                         0
c
o
o
CO
D
a

0>
75


!f
o
o
§5.

52

8g
o t
+- s
o ^
                           II
                         om
                   o
                   o
                 UJ

                 J-

                 X
                 UJ
VI-19

-------
                                <
                                Q
a
2


O

                           O
                           <
                           a.
                               tr
                               o
                                         CO
                                         +••
                                         «?
                                         o
                                         c
                                         o
                                         m
                                         i_
                                         o
                                         (0
                                         D

                                         c
                                         o
          c
          o
         O
                                         = 10
                                         CO CM

                                         rt  II
                                         CO CO




                                         "5 ^

                                         CO CO
                                         f o>



                                         IQ:
                                         iCD





                                         D to


                                         CM
                                         !—I
                                          I
                                         f—H
                                         s>

                                         LU
VI-?0

-------
                                             <
                                             Q
                                             01
                                             _i
                                             m
                                             O
                                             oc
                                             Q.
I
OCCASIONAL
                                             U
                                        LU
                                        h-
                                        X
                                        LU
                                                        (0
                                                        c
                                                        o
 c
 o
o
                                                        3  I!
                                                           (0
                                                        o 
                                                        W CO
                                                        o o
                                                        Of£

                                                        OOC
                                                        tm
                                                        o
                                                       0
                                                        o .2
                                                        = •(5
                                                          ^
                                                        oo
                                                        CD
VI-21

-------
     <
     Q
     o

     Q.
c
0)
o

0)
Q.

NOR
               DC
               CQ
               CO
                      CO
                      

                     "o
                      c
                      0)
                     CQ

                      0>
                c
                0
                co
                v-CV
                n"
     o
     LL
     Z
     g
     CO
                      o ro
                      ca 5
                      CL=
O

-------
     The second  most important set of reservoir water quality conditions
affecting user benefits  are  related  to  eutrophication:     algae,  high
nutrients, low dissolved oxygen, and taste and odor problems.   Cumulative
percentages of reservoirs with data where these conditions   were rated as
having  at  least  significant  impacts  on user benefits were:  algae 17
percent, high nutrients 15 percent, low dissolved oxygen 14  percent,  and
taste and  odor problems 12 percent.  There were no severe  impact ratings
for high nutrients or taste and odor problems, however.

     Although iron is often present in USBR reservoirs,   it was  rated as
having at  least a  significant impact on user benefits in  only 4 percent
of the rated reservoirs.  In fact, it should be noted that   only drawdown
and pool  fluctuation were perceived as having really significant impacts
on reservoir user benefits.

     Tailwater conditions and user impacts are depicted in   Figures VI-13
and  VI-14,   respectively.    Here  again,  the  major  impact-producing
conditions seem to cluster around the mode of  operation of  water supply
reservoirs in  an arid  region:  high flow, low flow, turbidity, and high
temperature.  Of these, high flow  was rated  as having  significant user
impacts in  21 percent of the tailwaters with data, but in  no case was it
rated as having a severe impact.  The  other three  conditions were rated
as having  at least  a significant  impact in 13 percent, 12 percent,  and
11 percent  of  the  rated  tailwaters,  respectively.    Taste  and odor
problems were  rated as  significant in 13 percent of the tailwaters with
available data, but were not considered severe in any case.
                                 VI-23

-------
OVERVIEW

      The Corps of Engineers (COE),  Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), and
U.S. Bureau of  Reclamation  (USBR) each  prepared  an assessment  of known
water  quality  conditions at  their  water  impoundment  projects.   These
assessments are  based  on a questionnaire  completed by  Agency personnel
familiar with the water quality conditions at each project.  The result is
a  subjective  data  base for  each Agency,  presenting  the frequency  of
occurrence of specified water quality conditions and their relative degree
of impact to user benefits.  Parameter-specific data  were  not available for
a large percentage of the projects responding  to the  questionnaires.  Also,
it is likely that existing water quality data were collected primarily at
projects where  some  problem was  noted  or  suspected.   Consequently,  the
available data on water quality  conditions  may be  skewed,  introducing a
pessimistic bias.  It is, therefore, difficult to project results of these
assessments to each Agency's population of impoundments.

      The  water  quality  conditions  described  in   the results  of  the
agencies' questionnaire  survey  are a  mix  of conventional  water quality
parameters (e.g., low  dissolved  oxygen, pH,  turbidity,  taste  and  odor,
bacteria, nutrients,  dissolved solids,  metals, and organics) and chemical
and physical  parameters of specific interest  to impoundments (e.g., iron,
manganese, hydrogen sulfide,  temperature,  algae, sediment accumulation,
pool level fluctuations, and shore erosion).   The physical  parameters are
reported as occurring with greater frequency and at higher levels of impact
than the chemical parameters.  Pool  and tailwater fluctuations; high and
low flows; erosion, sediment  transport, and  sediment  accretion were the
primary physical water  quality problems  reported.  It is not known whether
the physical  parameters are actually more problematic or whether, in view
of the  lack of  hard monitoring  data on chemical  water quality,  the more
visible  physical  parameters  are  simply  easier to  detect  and  report
subjectively.  For the  TVA system, even though physical concerns are more
prevalent, chemical  concerns are generally more serious when they occur.

      Low dissolved oxygen  in pool  hypolimnia appears to  be  a seasonal
concern primarily in projects located in the  eastern half of the country.
Low dissolved  oxygen   occurred  as at  least   an  intermittent  problem  in
47 percent of the COE reservoirs,  70  percent of TVA's reservoirs, and only
9 percent of USSR's reservoirs.   Tailwaters  experienced similar results,
with low dissolved oxygen reported as at least an intermittent problem in
25 percent of COE's tailwaters, 38 percent of TVA's tailwaters, and only
4 percent of USSR's tailwaters.   The USBR assessment showed that problems
of  low  DO,  dissolved  iron  and  manganese,   and   hydrogen  sulfide  are
relatively rare at Bureau dams,  although summer thermal stratification is
nearly  universal  and   low  level   outlets  are not uncommon.    Some  major
differences between these reservoirs and southeastern reservoirs, where low
DO problems may be more prevalent,  are  that the western reservoirs are, on
the average, less eutrophic (i.e., lower  BOD), more rapidly flushed, and
subject to shorter thermal stratification periods. In general, the factors
which  are  involved  here include  an  arid climate,  relatively  low inflow
nutrient  concentrations,  a  lower  intensity  of   development  in  the
watersheds, and a wider range of seasonal water temperature fluctuations.
The  size  and  depth of most  Bureau  reservoirs are   not  substantially
different from those in the southeast,  however.

                                   VI-24

-------
      Coincident with the loss  of dissolved oxygen from pool hypolimnia is
the increased release of dissolved materials from bottom sediments.  Iron,
manganese, and hydrogen sulfide often  appear in elevated concentrations in
the tailwaters of projects with  low dissolved  oxygen;  the COE assessment
reports a clear link  in  these  parameters  where data  were  available.   TVA
noted that iron,  manganese, and hydrogen sulfide appeared in 50 percent of
their projects with low dissolved oxygen.

      The  COE assessment  reports  pronounced  regional patterns  in  the
distributions of some water quality conditions.   For example, reservoirs
located in  areas with highly erodible soils experience greater sediment
loads and generally experience greater problems with turbidity  in tailwater
releases  and sediment  accretion in  the  pool.   Similarily,  reservoirs
experiencing  high  nutrient  and/or metals  inputs from  the  surrounding
watershed  typically   reported   more   problems  with  eutrophication,   low
dissolved oxygen, and  other  related  issues in both  pool  and tailwaters.
Many of  the results  reported  by TVA  and USER can  also be  explained by
regional/local influences of land use, geology,  topography, and climate.
                                   VI-25

-------
                             VII.  CONCLUSIONS
      This  report  addresses  general  issues  of water  quality  effects
associated with impoundment of water  by dams.   It attempts to estimate the
character and national  extent  of  these effects  through a literature review
and  analyses  conducted on  a  random  sample  of  a  partitioned data  base
population  of 68,155  dams.   Insufficient  data were  collected  to  draw
quantitative  conclusions   pertaining  to  small  dams  (less  than  10,000
acre-feet normal  storage volume)  and to a  large  degree, large nonpower dams
(at least 10,000 acre-feet of normal  storage  volume and no reported power
generating capacity).  Quantitative and qualitative conclusions are drawn
for  large  power dams  (greater  than 10,000  acre«feet  of  normal  storage
volume and 100 kilowatts or more  of installed power).  General conclusions
regarding likely  water quality   effects  are  derived from  the  literature
review.   Specific  conclusions are based on  the results of  the  four EPA
analyses.  Three federal agencies,  the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE),
the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), and the  U.S.  Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR) conducted  independent  assessments of water  quality  conditions at
their  respective   water   resource  projects.     Due   to   the   complex
interrelationships  of  the  potential  water quality  effects,  the  numerous
variables affecting impoundment  water quality,  and the  lack of sufficient
detailed  information,   it   is difficult  to   draw  accurate  conclusions
regarding the  national  extent of  water  quality effects  attributable to
impoundments.

      This study is limited in estimating the national extent of dam water
quality primarily  because  of  a  lack of monitoring  and  descriptive data.
The STOrage and  RETrieval data base (STORET) was used as the primary source
of monitoring data.  Although  quite extensive,  data were not available for
many of the sites randomly  selected for analysis.  Other descriptive data,
such  as  the  type   of  outlet  structure,   watershed   land  use,  and  other
influences  on  water quality,  were  also  not  available  for this  study.
Additional monitoring data, descriptive data,  and a larger random sample
of dams would probably extend  the study's findings.

      Impoundments  are  created   for  a  variety  of  purposes  that  provide
important social,  economic, and  aesthetic benefits.  Most projects serve
multiple purposes,  and it  is  important to recognize impoundment  benefits
and purposes  in  evaluating  their water quality consequences.   Among the
project purposes  recognized in   this report  are:   hydropower  generation
including  pump   storage,   navigation,   flood  control,   water   supply,
conservation, recreation,   fish   and  wildlife  maintenance, water  quality
enhancement,  and  low  flow  augmentation.    Operating    impoundments  to
achieve   multiple   purposes   is   often   complicated  by  conflicting
                                VII-1

-------
requirements  for  water  flow  and  quality.     Water quality within the
reservoir is dependent upon  watershed land  use,  point  sources, project
design,  depth,   season,  and  climate.     Water quality in the tailwater
depends on the depth of water  withdrawal,  project  design, configuration
of the tailwater channel,  and local atmospheric conditions.

     During the   past 20 years, there has been a growing awareness of the
importance  of  water  quality   for  water   resources  development  and
management.    This  has  resulted  in  major changes in the policies and
practices of Federal agencies,  state and  local agencies,  private water
developers,  and  the  related  professions.   Active research programs on
water quality have been initiated and carried out and coordinated.   As a
result, the  planning, design,  and operations  of dams  show an enhanced
consideration of water quality.    This  trend  should  be  encouraged to
continue.
WATER QUALITY EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENTS

     Impoundment  of  free-flowing  water  by dams may potentially create
several effects, both positive and negative,  on water  quality within the
pool and  downstream.   Although this report  focuses on unwanted effects,
desirable changes, such as a reduced sediment load, may also result.  The
potential effects are often interdependent.   Altering one condition in an
impoundment may create a  ripple  of  effects  throughout  the reservoir-
stream ecosystem.

     Impoundments  can  modify  the  physical,   chemical,  and biological
characteristics of the  free-flowing  aquatic  ecosystem.    Physical and
chemical  characteristics  in  impoundments  are  also  related to depth,
volume,  climate,  watershed  land  use,  geographic  location, reservoir
siting, and  the schedule  of water releases.  Biological characteristics
are related to the type of habitat.  The magnitude  of effect  of the dam
on water quality of releases appears related  to the type of reservoir and
to the design and operation of the impoundment.

     Effects  can  generally  be   characterized  in   three  categories:
stratification-related,  eutrophication,  and  other  changes.    Thermal
stratification of reservoirs results in  warm  waters  of  the epilimnion
(surface  waters)  overlying  cooler  and  therefore denser waters of the
hypolimnion  (bottom  waters).    Deeper  impoundments  with  poor mixing
characteristics tend  to stratify.   Compared  to waters  upstream of the
impoundment, the waters of  the  epilimnion  may  tend  to  have slightly
higher temperatures  and somewhat  lower nutrient concentrations.  Waters
of  the  hypolimnion,  on  the  other  hand,   tend  to  have  much  lower
temperatures and lower dissolved oxygen levels.

     When   low   concentrations   of   dissolved  oxygen  (e.g.,  anoxic
conditions) occur in the  hypolimnion of  reservoirs, this  can result in
the formation  of reduced forms of iron, manganese, sulfur, and nitrogen.
The reduced forms of these compounds  can adversely  affect water quality
and may be detrimental to aquatic life.  These compounds are converted to

                                VII-2

-------
more  assimilable  compounds  in  oxidizing  environments,  such  as  the
epilimnion and tailwaters with adequate dissolved  oxygen concentrations.
Well-mixed, unstratified reservoirs seldom experience problems with iron,
manganese, sulfur, or nitrogen compounds.

     Eutrophication is a naturally-occurring  process involving increased
growth  and   death  rates   of  aquatic   plants  as  well  as  sediment
accumulation, and is typically associated with  reservoir aging.   Excess
nutrients  (especially  nitrogen  and  phosphorous) in an impoundment can
increase eutrophication to undesirable levels.  The settling and decay of
excess  aquatic  vegetation  can  deplete  dissolved oxygen levels in the
hypolimnion,  leading to anoxic conditions.

     Water quality conditions in impoundment tailwaters are determined by
water quality  in the  reservoir and  design and operation of the project
outlet works.  For  stratified  impoundments,  a  primary  determinant of
downstream water  quality is  whether a dam's outlet releases waters from
the epilimnion or the hypolimnion.  With respect  to temperature, release
of cool  hypolimnetic waters, if done consistently all summer, can have a
desirable effect on downstream  fisheries in  many parts  of the country.
However, low dissolved oxygen concentrations in the released hypolimnetic
waters may limit its ability to support some aquatic life.

     Thus,  the  effects  of   stratification,  possibly   compounded  by
eutrophication, are passed downstream via the discharge conduits.  If the
outlets are at a low level, colder, possibly low dissolved oxygen, waters
are released.   If  the outlets  are at  a surface spillway, or downpipe,
warmer waters are discharged and the dissolved oxygen  levels tend  to be
higher  because  of  turbulence  and  splash and also because of possible
algal photosynthesis in the  summer.    Power  dams  frequently  have low
outlets.   Large nonpower  and small  dams are  less likely  to have such
outlets because project purposes  do not  require their  use.   If a low-
level outlet exists as part of a large nonpower dam, reaeration typically
takes  place  in  the  process  of  energy  dissipation  associated  with
reservoir releases.

     Other  water  quality  effects  are  generally considered to be less
predominant  than  eutrophication  and  stratification-enhanced  effects.
Supersaturation  of  gases  can  occur  as  the  result of rapid pressure
changes in spillway discharges  plunging into  deep stilling  basins, and
may cause  fish to suffer from gas bubble disease.  Reservoirs, by virtue
of surface evaporation, and in some cases the acceptance of return flows,
may experience elevated salinity concentrations.  The capture of sediment
behind an impoundment and changes in erosion patterns downstream may also
have an effect on water quality.  Dams and their operations usually alter
the  "natural"  flow  patterns.    This   effect  may   be  desirable  or
undesirable.     Reaeration  denial,  where it occurs, deprives downstream
waters of dissolved oxygen which would have been generated in the absence
of the impoundment.
                                VII-3

-------
     Reservoirs with short hydraulic residence times have reduced impacts
on tailwaters because the  water  is  discharged  before  the  effects of
impoundment  are  well  established.    Reservoirs  with  long  hydraulic
residence times act as settling basins,  removing suspended  material  from
inflowing waters.  Pollutants and nutrients adsorbed to the sediments are
also removed, settling to the bottom of  the reservoir.
RESULTS OF EPA ANALYSES

     Four analyses were conducted in an attempt to  estimate the national
scope  of  the  water  quality  effects.    Information on small  and large
nonpower impoundments was limited,  and no  quantitative conclusions could
be  reached  through  the  analyses  regarding  the  effects of  these two
categories of dams except for  the   mixing  analysis  for  large nonpower
dams.    The  investigative  information  that is available pertaining to
large nonpower and small   dams  is   presented  in  the  appendices.   The
results  of  the  four  analyses  -  mixing,   tailwater dissolved oxygen,
upstream/downstream comparison, and phosphorus enrichment - are  presented
in the following paragraphs.

     The entire study population of 68,155 impoundments were analyzed for
their mixing  potential.     Froude   numbers  were  used  as  an   index to
determine an  impoundment's tendency to thermally stratify.  Impoundments
that are strongly  mixed  are  unlikely  to  have  adverse  water quality
effects on  tailwaters, whereas unmixed or stratified impoundments may be
vulnerable to adverse water quality  effects,  which  may  be transferred
downstream  by  low-level  outlet  structures.    It is estimated that 40
percent of the  large  (over  10,000  acre-feet)  power  impoundments are
potentially  stratified  as  shown   in  Figure VII-1.  For large nonpower
impoundments,  37   percent  are   potentially  stratified.     Of  these
potentially stratified  impoundments, some  will experience water quality
effects and some will not.

     The second analysis was the comparison of dissolved oxygen  levels in
tailwaters  below  power  impoundments.    Dissolved  oxygen  levels were
compared with a criterion of  5  mg/1  for  winter  and  summer   data and
regional data.  Data were not statistically representative so that it was
not possible to estimate dissolved  oxygen levels on a national  basis, but
for  the  sample  as  shown  in  Figure  VII-2,  two  relationships  were
established:

          Dissolved oxygen in power dam tailwaters during the summer have
          a much greater probability of not meeting a criterion  of 5 mg/1
          than during winter.

          Larger power generating facilities  show a  greater probability
          of  not  meeting  a  dissolved oxygen criterion than do smaller
          power generating facilities.

However, these  are  general  relationships  and  should  not  be applied
directly to  individual impoundments without recognition of site-specific
conditions.
                                VII-4

-------
      37%
                                     40%
                             19%
        44%
         LARGE - NONPOYER DAMS
                (n =1701)
 51%
LARGE - POWER DAMS
      (A = 424)
                 LEGEND:  Potentially Stratified

                         Yearly Stratified or Mixed

                         Missing Date

                         a - Population

                             Figure VII-1
                    Percentages of Mixing Tendency
SUMMEI/DAMS>3tMW WINTE1/DAMS>3«MW  SUMMEI/DAMS<30MW  WINTEl/DAMS<30m
     k\\\\XN OAK IIDCE NAT'L LAB
             THIS STUDY
                              Figure VII-2
                  Probabilities of Non-coatpliance (PNC)
                    with 5 mg/1 Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
                              VII-5

-------
     The  third  analysis  was  an  attempted  comparison of upstream and
downstream  concentrations   of  temperature,   dissolved  oxygen,   iron,
manganese, phosphorous,   and nitrogen.    The analysis focused on a  random
sample of 40 impoundments from the 424  large power impoundments.  Because
only  half  of  the  sample  had  data   on temperature,  dissolved oxygen,
phosphorous, and TKN, findings are limited  to wide  ranges applicable to
the sample as follows:

          Between 28 percent  and 55 percent  of large power impoundments
          are likely  to  increase  downstream  temperatures  and between
          13 percent and 40 percent are likely to decrease annual average
          downstream temperature.

          Between 23 percent and 50 percent are likely to cause decreased
          dissolved oxygen  levels in the tailwaters.  Between 15 percent
          and 42 percent are likely to   cause increased  dissolved  oxygen
          levels in tailwaters.

          Data were also collected for  large nonpower and small dams, but
          success was limited to  a minority  of sites.    The  results of
          these efforts  are summarized  in the appendices.

     The   fourth   analysis   estimated  phosphorous  enrichment  within
impoundment pools, which  is  a  potential  indicator  of eutrophication.
This indicator is limited by a lack of  information on light availability,
hydraulic  retention  time,  and   other  site-specific  characteristics.
Phosphorous levels  were—both observed and estimated—compared against a
guidance value of 0.025  mg/1  as  a  means  of  describing  high  and low
potential  for  enrichment.    This  analysis was conducted with a  random
sample of 40 large power dams (population of 424).   The sample  of large
power dams  showed 58  to 78  percent with phosphorous levels above 0.025
mg/1.  Data were insufficient for similar analyses of large  nonpower and
small  impoundments.    A  summary  of  some of the more important results
appears in Figure VII-3.
AGENCY ASSESSMENTS

     The U.S. Army Corps  of Engineers,  the Tennessee  Valley Authority,
and the  U.S. Bureau of Reclamation were invited to submit assessments of
water quality conditions in their  own  impoundments.    Dams  from these
three  agencies  represent  a  wide  range  of  geography,  climate,  and
operational  situations.      The   agencies   surveyed   their  existing
impoundments  using  a  questionnaire  developed  by  COE,  asking  field
personnel what  the  dam-related  water  quality  problems  are  and what
impacts  are  being  felt.    The resulting data, although subjective and
incomplete, gives a picture of the extent of known water quality problems
along  with  an  assessment  of  these problems on user benefits.  Agency
assessments based on visual  observations  indicate  that  physical water
quality  conditions,  such  as  pool  level fluctuations and high and low
flows, may more frequently affect user benefits than  poor chemical water
quality conditions.   For  the TVA  system, chemical concerns are usually
more serious, even though physical parameters are more prevalent


                                VII-6

-------
       M
       O'
       •0
M
\o



H
        9*
        e.

                                         «    O

                                         5    -


                     *   i   ,

                     i   1l-
                     O   «   u
                                                          M


                                                         ~O
                                                  M


                                                  to
                                                                     O
                                                        -    2
                                                          M
                                                   H
                                                 	O
                                                                     O
                                           VII-7

-------
concerns.   It is possible that data were primarily collected at projects
where problems are known or suspected,  thereby introducing  a pessimistic
bias.

     The  COE  operates  more  than  700  impoundments  and has collected
questionnaires on 470.   A sample of 46  (10 percent) was selected based on
project type  and COE District.  Data were available for approximately 50
to 60 percent of the projects sampled.   Approximately 35 to 40 percent of
sampled projects  with  data had problematic conditions in the tailwaters.
Most prevalent were flow fluctuations and high and  low flow  issues, low
dissolved  oxygen,  and  erosion  and transport of sediment.  Problematic
conditions in impoundment pools were identified  in 40  to 50  percent of
the  sampled  projects   with  data.    Most prevalent were eutrophication
problems  (high  nutrients,  low  dissolved  oxygen,  algal  blooms,  and
macrophytes).   Additional conditions  of concern in pools were excessive
concentrations  of  reduced  iron  and   manganese  in  bottom  waters and
accumulation of sediment and contaminants.

     TVA assessed  all  33 of their large projects, including all of their
hydropower projects and four nonhydro projects.  Small  impoundments were
not  assessed.    Data   were available  for dissolved oxygen, temperature,
flow, pool levels, and  macrophytes at all projects.   Data  for the other
parameters were  available for  an average of 60 percent of the projects.
Water uses were severely impacted at several sites.  In  reservoir pools,
the most  significant impacts were pool level fluctuations (50 percent of
the projects with data), bacteria  (30   percent),  and  turbidity, algae,
macrophytes,  sediment   accretion,  and  shore  erosion  (all  at  15  to
20 percent).  Tailwaters primarily experienced significant  problems with
low  dissolved  oxygen,  flow  (high,  low,  and  fluctuating),  and  low
temperature, occurring  at 15 to 20 percent of the projects with data.

     USBR maintains 349 impoundments in the 17 western  states; of these,
250 (72 percent)  responded to  the questionnaires.   In approximately 54
percent of the reservoir pools and 59 percent of the  tailwater cases, no
data were  available.  The main impact-producing conditions identified at
USBR reservoirs are drawdown and pool  fluctuation, which  are associated
with a mode of operation that combines  rapid spring filling of reservoirs
with a steady withdrawal of water  to satisfy  irrigation, municipal, and
industrial demands during the long dry season.  These two conditions were
rated as having at least  significant  impacts  on  user  benefits  in 36
percent and  35 percent,  respectively, of  the reservoirs with available
data.  High flow was the  main impact-producing  condition noted  in USBR
tailwaters,  probably  reflecting  the  high  spring inflows and spillway
discharges of the mid-1980's.   This  condition  was  rated  as  having a
significant  impact   on  user  benefits  in  21  percent  of  the  rated
tailwaters.  The next  two significant  impact-producing conditions cited
were low  flow and taste and odor problems, each with a cumulative rating
of at least significant  in  about  13  percent  of  the  tailwaters with
available data.
                                VII-8

-------
SUMMARY OF EPA ANALYSES AND AGENCY ASSESSMENTS

      The  results  of  the four  EPA  analyses  conducted  for this  study
(mixing,  tail water  dissolved oxygen,  upstream/downstream comparison  of
parameters, and phosphorous enrichment) cannot be directly related to the
findings of the  Agency assessments  due to differences  in  the  analytical
methods and parameters.   However, a  few  simple comparisons can  be  made
which  illustrate the  likely  range  in  which certain  dam water  quality
conditions occur.  The study assessment of large power impoundments found
that low dissolved oxygen  in tailwaters occurs  more  frequently  in summer
than winter and at  large  power impoundments over small power impoundments.
The COE reported that approximately 33 percent of the projects assessed had
dissolved oxygen concentrations below saturation during the summer months,
while TVA  reported  seasonal  low  dissolved oxygen in  70  percent  of their
reservoir  hypolimnia  or  bottom waters.    USBR  experienced  at  least
intermittent low dissolved  oxygen   levels  in  only  9  percent  of  their
reservoirs.

      The upstream/downstream comparison found low dissolved oxygen in 23
to 50 percent of large power impoundment  tailwaters.   Assessments by the
COC  and  TVA  reported  similar   results,  although  their  data  were  not
restricted to large power impoundments.  COE reported 20 percent of their
project tailwaters  experienced  at least  intermittent problems with  low
dissolved oxygen, while TVA reported  38 percent with at least intermittent
problems.  USBR reported only 4 percent of their projects as experiencing
at least  intermittent  problems with  low dissolved oxygen  in tailwaters.
Both the data analyzed by  this study and  the information provided by the
Agencies  indicate  that low dissolved  oxygen  is influenced, in  part,  by
climate  and is  therefore more   likely  to   occur  in  eastern  dams,  and
particularly in southeastern dams.

      The  phosphorous  analysis  estimated  phosphorous enrichment  within
impoundment  pools   of  large  power  dams  as a potential  indicator  of
eutrophication.  The analysis showed  58 to  78 percent of the large power
dam pools had phosphorous above a guidance value  of 0.025  mg/1.  The Agency
assessments subjectively estimated  the frequency  of occurrence  of  high
nutrient loads  (presumably a combination  of  nitrogen  and phosphorous)  in
pools.   Agency  impoundments were  not  restricted  to large  power dams.  High
nutrient loads  were reported in 35 percent of the COE's pools,  30 percent
of TVA's pools, and 15 percent  of USSR's pools.
                                   VII-9

-------
                                 APPENDIX A
                                 REFERENCES
  Allen,  H.E.  and  J.R.  Kramer,  eds., Nutrients in Natural Waters, John
  Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1972.

  Barnett,  R.H.,  "Case  Study   of  Reaeration   of  Casitas  Reservoir,"
  Proceedings of the ASCE Symposium on Reaeration Research, Gatlinburg, TN,
  1976.

* Bouck,  G.R.,  "Air  Supersaturation  in  Surface   Water:  A  Continuing
  Engineering  and  Biological  Problem",  Proceedings  of the Symposium on
  Surface Water Impoundments ASCE, Minneapolis, MN, June 2-5, 1980.

  Bowker, A.H. and G.J.  Lieberman, Engineering  Statistics, Prentice-Hall,
  Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972.

* Cada, G.F.,  K.D. Kumar,  J.A. Solomon, and S.G. Hildebrand, "An Analysis
  of Dissolved  Oxygen Concentrations  in Tailwaters  of Hydroelectric Dams
  and  the  Implications  of  Small-Scale  Hydropower  Development",  Water
  Resources Research, Volume 19, No. 4, pp. 1043-1048, 1983.

  Carcich, I.G., and T. J. Tofflemire,  "Distribution and  Concentration of
  PCB in  the Hudson River and Associated Management Problems," Environment
  International. Vol. VII, 1982.

  Cassel, C.M., C.E. S rndal, and J.H. Wretman, Foundations of Interence in
  Survey Samplings, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1977.

  Clark,  J.W.,  W.  Viessman,  M.J.  Hammer,  Water  Supply  and Pollution
  Control. 3rd edition, Harper and Row, New York, NY, 1977.

* Dompier, D. and J.R. Woodworth, "Rehabilitation of Salmonid  Fish Streams
  Through  Upstream  Storage",  Proceedings  of  Wild Trout II, Yellowstone
  National Park, September 24-25, 1979, Trout  Unlimited and  Federation of
  Fly Fishermen, 1980.

  Electric  Power  Research  Institute,  Robustness  of  the ANOVA Model in
  Environmental Monitoring  Applications.  Technical  Report  EPRI EA-4015,
  Palo Alto, CA, 1985.

* Fast, A.W.,  "Artificial Aeration  as a Lake Restoration Technique", Lake
  Restoration, Proceedings  of a  National Conference,  August 22-24, 1978,
  U.S. EPA, Minneapolis, MN, 1979.

  Federal Reporter  693, Second  Series, "National  Wildlife Federation, et
  al. v. Anne Gorsuch,  Administrator, Environmental  Protection Agency, et
  al.", pp. 156-183.

                                   A-l

-------
 Federal Energy  Regulatory Commission  (FERC), Hydro Resources Assessment
 (approx. 15,000 entries), personal correspondence, 1987.

 Golze, A.R., Handbook of Dam Engineering, Van Nostrand  Reinhold Company,
 New York, NY, 1977.

 Higgins, J.M.,  W.L. Poppe, and M.L. Iwanski, "Eutrophication Analysis of
 TVA Reservoirs",  Proceedings  of  an  ASCE  Symposium  on  Surface Water
 Impoundments, H.G. Stefon, ed., Minneapolis, MM, June 1980.

*Hoe1, P.G.,  Introduction to Mathematical  Statistics, John Wiley and Sons,
 Inc., New York, NY, 1951.

 Johnson,  P.L.,  "The  Influence  of  Air  Flow  Rate  on  Line  Diffuser
 Efficiency   and  Impoundment  Impact,"  Proceedings  of  the Symposium on
 Surface Water Impoundments, Minneapolis,  MN, 1980.

*Keeley,  J.W.,  et  al.,  Reservoirs  and  Waterways:  Identification and
 Assessment   of  Environmental  Problems and Research Program Development,
 Technical Report E-78-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment
 Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1978.

*Kennedy,  R.H.,  R.F.  Gaugush,  "Assessment of Water Quality Enhancement
 Needs for Corps of Engineers  Reservoirs,"  Presented  at  Seventh Annual
 International Symposium, North American Lake Management Society, Orlando,
 FL, November 1987.

*Kendall, M.G. and A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 1,
 "Distribution Theory," Hafner Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1963.

*Kerr,  K.M.,  "Effects  of  Bottom  Withdrawal  on  Thermal  and Chemical
 Stratification of a  Small  Artificial  Reservoir,"  Thesis  submitted in
 partial  fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the degree of Master of
 Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 1977.

*Larson, D.P. and H.T. Mercier, "Phosphorus Retention Capacity  of Lakes,"
 J. Fish. Res. Board Canada, 33:1742-1750, 1976.

 Miller,  J.B.,  "Intermountain  West  Reservoir  Limnology and Management
 Options," Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference, North American Lake
 Management  Society. Knoxville, TN, 1983.

*Moore,  J.W.,   "Water  Quality   Investigation  of  a  Small  Artificial
 Reservoir,"  Prepared  for  Department  of  Commerce,  State  of Arkansas,
 Little Rock, AR, 1973.

 National  Academy  of  Sciences,  "Eutrophication - Causes, Consequences,
 Corrections", Proceedings of a  Symposium, National  Academy of Sciences,
 Washington,  D.C., 1969.

 National Wildlife  Federation, NWF  V. Consumers Power Co., No. G85-1146,
 Kalamazoo,  MI, 1987.
                               A-2

-------
  National  Wildlife  Federation,  Appellee's  Connected Brief  -  August  1982.

  Peters,  J.C.,   "Modification  of   Intakes  at  Flaming  Gorge   Dam, Utah,  to
  Improve   Water   Temperature   in   the   Green  River,"   Proceedings   of   an
  International  Symposium,  Knoxville, TN,  1978.

* Peterson,   S.A.,   "Dredging   and   Lake  Restoration",   Lake  Restoration,
  Proceeding  of   a  National  Conference,   August  22-24,   1978,  U.S. EPA,
  Minneapolis, MN,  1979.

*Pfitzer,  D.,   "Tailwater Trout   Fisheries with  Special  Reference to  the
  Southeastern States",  Proceedings of  the  Wild Trout Management  Symposium,
  Yellowstone National  Park, September  25-26, 1974,  Trout Unlimited,  1975.

  Reid,  G.K., Ecology  of  Inland Waters and Estuaries,  D. Van Nostrand Co.,
  New York, NY,  1961.

  Ruttner,  Franz  (translated by D.G.  Frey   and F.E.   Frey),  Fundamentals of
  Limnology,  third edition, University  of  Toronto Press,  1970.

* SAS  Institute   Inc.,  SAS  User's  Guide:     Basics,   1982  Edition,  SAS
  Institute Inc.,  Gary,  NC, 1982.

  Sawyer,  C.N.,  Chemistry  for   Sanitary  Engineers,   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,
  Inc.,  New York,  NY, 1960.

*Schweibert, E.,  Trout, E.P. Dutton,  Inc,  New York, NY,  1984.

* Sobotka   and    Company,   Inc.,  "Regulatory  Approaches  to  Productivity
  Management  in  Lakes   and Reservoirs,"  prepared   for   U.S. Environmental
  Protection  Agency,  Office of Regulatons  and Standards, Washington, D.C.,
  1986.

*Soil   Conservation  Service,   Highlights   of  Studies   Which  Assess   the
  Influence   of   Flood   Control   Impoundments  on  Water  Quality, USDA-SCS,
  Auburn,  Alabama,  addendum 1987.

* Soil  Conservation  Service, Water   Quality Effects  of  Impoundments, South
  Technical   Service  Center,   Series   No.   802,  USDA-SCS,  Forth  Worth,  TX,
  1979.

* Soil  Conservation  Service, An Evaluation   of  Water  Quality  and  Related
  Biological  Parameters    of   Four  Reservoirs  and Their   Inflowing   and
  Receiving   Perennial   Streams,  Contract    No.  AG28565-00876,  USDA-SCS,
  Jackson,  MS, 1978.

* Streeter, H.W.,   and  E.B. Phelps, A   Study of  the Pollution and  Natural
  Purification of  the Ohio River,   Public   Health  Bulletin   No.  146, U.S.
  Public Health  Service, Washington,  D.C.,  reprinted 1958.
                               A-3

-------
  Symons,  J.,   S.R.  Weibel,   and  G.G.   Robeck,  Influence  of  Impoundments  on
  Water  Quality -  A  Review  of Literature  and  Statement  of Research  Needs.,
  US  Department of  Health,   Education  and  Welfare.  PHS Publication  999-WP-
  18,  R.A.  Taft Engineering  Center,  Cincinnati,  OH,  1964.

  Taubert,  B.D., "Changes  in  the   Trout  Fisheries   of  the   Lower Colorado
  River   and  Arizona",  Wild  Trout   III,  Proceedings  of   the  Symposium,
  Yellowstone  National  Park,  September  24-25,  1984,  Trout Unlimited,  1984.

* Tennessee Valley   Authority,    Improving   Reservoir   Releases,   Report
  TVA/ONRED/AWR-87/33,  Knoxville,  TN,  1987a.

* Tennessee Valley Authority, Case Studies  (Draft),  1987b.

* Tennessee Valley  Authority,  Trophic  Status Evaluation  of  TVA Reservoirs.
  Report TVA/ONR/WR-83/7,  Chattanooga,  TN,  1983.

* Tennessee Valley  Authority,  Impact  of Reservoir   Releases on  Downstream
  Water  Quality and  Uses,  Chattanooga,  TN,  1978.

  Thomas,  H.H., The Engineering   of  Large  Dams,  John Wiley  and Sons,  Inc.,
  New York,  NY, 1976.

* U.S. Army Corps  of Engineers, Case  Studies,  1987.

* U.S. Army Corps  of Engineers,   Techniques  for   Reaeration  of  Hydropower
  Releases,  Technical  Report  E-83-5,  Washington,  D.C.,  1983.

* U.S. Army Corps of  Engineers,  "National  Program of  Inspection  of Non-
  Federal  Dams, Final   Report  to  Congress,"  USAGE,  HQUSACE, Washington,
  D.C.,  1982a.

* U.S. Army Corps of  Engineers,  National   Inventory of   Dams Data  Base  in
  Card Format, Accession No.  ADA118670, (9  track  tape),  NTIS, Springfield,
  Virginia,  1982b.

  U.S.   Congress,  92nd Congress,  "Federal   Water   Pollution  Control Act
  Amendments of 1972," Public Law 92-500, Washington D.C., 1972.

  U.S. Department  of Agriculture,  SCS,  Engineering  Division, Dam Inventory
  System User's Guide, Fort Collins,  CO,  1984.

  U.S. Department  of Energy,  Federal  Energy  Regulatory Commission, PURPA
  Benefits at  New  Dams and Diversions,  Docket No. EL87-9, Washington, D.C.,
  1987.

*U.S. Department  of Health* Education and  Welfare,  Symposium on Streamflow
  -Regulation  for  Quality  Control, April  3-5,  1963, Public   Health  Service
  Publication  999-WP-30, 1965.
                                 A-4

-------
  U.S. Department  of Health, Education and Welfare, Water Quality Behavior
  in Reservoirs, Public Health Service Publication 1930, Washington, D.C.

  U.S. Department of  the  Interior,  Bureau  of  Reclamation, Limnological
  Effects of  Artificial Aeration  at Lake  Cachuma, California. 1980-1984,
  Technical Report REC-ERC-87-10, Denver, CO, 1987a.

 *U.S. Department of the Interior,  Bureau  of  Reclamation,  Case Studies,
  1987b.

  U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  Bureau  of Reclamation, Statistical
' Compilation of  Engineering Features  on Bureau  of Reclamation Projects,
  Denver, CO, 1984.

  U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior,  A Mathematical Model for Predicting
  River Temperatures - Application to the  Green River  Below Flaming Gorge
  Dam, Technical Report REL-ERC-76-7, Denver, CO, 1979.

  U.S. Department  of the  Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Design of Small
  Dams, Washington, D.C., 1977.

 * U.S. EPA, Quality Criteria  for Water  1986, Technical  Report EPA 440/5-
  86-001,  Office  of  Water  Regulations  and Standards, Washington, D.C.,
  1986.

 * U.S. EPA, Rates, Constants,  and Kinetics  Formulations in  Surface Water
  Quality  Modeling,  second  edition,  Report  EPA 600/3-85/040, Office of
  Research and Development, Athens, GA, 1985.

 *U.S.  EPA,  Water  Quality  Control  Information  System  (STORET),  User
  Handbook, Volumes  I and  II, Office  of Information Resource Management,
  Washington, D.C., 1982a.

  U.S. EPA, Appellees' Corrected Brief -  National Wildlife  Federation, et
  al. v.  Anne M.  Gorsuch, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency,
  August, 1982b.

  U.S. EPA, Reply Brief  for  the  Federal  Appellant  -  National Wildlife
  Federation,  et  al.  v.  Anne  M.  Gorsuch, Administrator, Environmental
  Protection Agency, et a!.,  (7 counts  - suit  for permitting impoundment
  releases as point sources), July, 1982c.

  U.S. EPA, Brief for the Federal Appellant - NWF v. EPA, National Wildlife
  Federation, et  al.  v.  Anne  M.  Gorsuch,  Administrator, Environmental
  Protection Agency,  et al.,  (7 counts  - suit for permitting impoundment
  releases as point sources), June, 1981.

 *U.S. EPA,  (Authorship: Kenneth  H. Reckhow,  Michigan State University),
  Quantitative  Techniques  for  the  Assessment of Lake Quality, Technical
  Report EPA-440/5-79-015, Washington, D.C., 1979a.
                                   A-5

-------
* U.S.  EPA,   Lake Restoration,  Proceedings of a National  Conference,  August
  22-24,  1978,  Office of  Water Planning  and Standards,   Washington, D.C.,
  1979b.

  U.S.   EPA,   Quantitative  Techniques  for the Assessment of Lake Quality,
  Technical  Report 440/5-79-015,  Washington,  D.C.,  1979c.

* U.S.  EPA,  (Project Officer:  Norman A.   Whalen),  Non-point  Source Control
  Guidance Hydrologic Modifications, Washington, D.C.,  1977.

  U.S.   EPA,    Impact  of   Hydrologic  Modifications   on  Water  Quality,
  Washington,  D.C., 1975.

  U.S.  EPA,   Chapter VI,  "National  Eutrophication   Survey,"  National Water
  Quality Inventory, 305(b)  Report to Congress, 1975b.

  U.S.    EPA,    Methods   for    Chemical  Analysis   of   Water  and  Wastes,
  Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  OH, 1974.

* U.S.  EPA,  The Control of Pollution Caused by  Hydrographic Modifications,
  Washington,  D.C., 1973.

* U.S.   EPA,   (Authorship:  Water  Resources Engineers,  Inc.),  Mathematical
  Models for  the Prediction  of  Thermal  Energy  Changes  in Impoundments,
  Technical  Report 16/30-EXT-12/69,  Washington, D.C., 1969.

* U.S.  Fish  and Wildlife Service, A Guide to Stream Habitat Analysis Using
  the Instream  Flow  Incremental  Methodology,  Instream  Flow Information
  Paper No.  12, Report FWS/OBS-82/26, Washington,  D.C.,  1982.

  U.S.  House   of Representatives,  99th Congress,  2nd Session,  Amending the
  Clean Water Act, Report 99-1004, Washington D.C., 1986a.

  U.S.   House  of  Representatives,   99th  Congress,   2nd  Session,   Water
  Resources  Development  Act   of  1986,  Report  99-1013, Washington D.C.,
  1986b.

* Vollenweider, R.A. and P.J.  Dillon,  The  Application   of  the Phosphorus
  Loading Concept to Eutrophication Research, Report 7,  NRCC 13690, Ottawa,
  Ontario, 1974.

  Vollenweider, R.A., "Input-Output Models  (With Special  Reference to the
  Phosphorus  Loading   Concept  in  Limnology,"  Conference  on  Chemical-
  Ecological  Considerations  for  Defining  the  Goals   of  Water Pollution
  Control, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland, April 19-21, 1972.

* Walker,  W.W.,   "Empirical   Methods  for  Predicting  Eutrophication  in
  Impoundments, Report 1,  Phase  I:    Data  Base  Development," Technical
  Report   E-81-9,   U.S.   Army  Engineer  Waterways  Experiment  Station,
  Vicksburg,  MS, 1981.
                                 A-6

-------
  Walker,   W.W.,    "Empirical   Methods  for  Predicting  Eutrophication   in
  Impoundments,  Report 2,  Phase I:   Model  Testing,"   Technical  Report E-81-
  9,  U.S.  Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg,  MS,  1982.

  Walker,   W.W.,    "Empirical   Methods  for  Predicting  Eutrophication   in
  Impoundments,  Report 3,  Phase II:    Model Refinements,"  Technical  Report
  E-81-9,  U.S.  Army Engineer   Waterways Experiment  Station,  Vicksburg,  MS,
  1985.

  Ward,  J.C.,  S.  Karaki,   Evaluation  of  Effect  of  Impoundment  on Water
  Quality  in  Cheney Reservoir,  Research  Report 25, Bureau of  Reclamation,
  Fort Collins,  CO,  1971.

  Water  Quality Division Committee  on  Nutrients  in  Water,   "Chemistry of
  Nitrogen and  Phosphorus in   Water", J.  American Water Works  Association,
  Volume 62, No.  2,  pp. 127-140,  1970.

  Water  Resources   Engineers,   Inc.,   Prediction   of   Thermal   Energy
  Distribution in  Streams and  Reservoirs,  prepared for the Department of
  Fish and Game,  State of  California,  Water  Resources  Engineers,  Walnut
  Creek, CA, 1967.

* Wiley, Robert  W.  and  James W. Mullen,  "Philosophy and Management  of  the
  Fontenelle - Green River Tailwater Trout  Fisheries", Proceedings   of  the
  Wild Trout Management Symposium,  Yellowstone National Park, September  25-
  26, 1974.   Trout Unlimited,  1975.
* All  references with an asterisk have  been cited  within the  body of the
  report and appendices.
                                 A-7

-------
                               APPENDIX B
                       SAMPLE/CASE STUDY DATA BASE
    This section  contains a compilation of the various data reflected in
the 120 sample and  15 case  study facilities.   The  135 dams  have been
broken  into  four  tables.  Each  table reflects a category of facility;
large power dams, large nonpower dams, small dams,  and case  study dams.
Every page  of the  tables contains  the category (i.e., random sample or
case study), the COE National Inventory of Dam identification number, and
the name  of the  facility.   Although these tables include a significant
amount of the data and statistics  used  in  the  report,  the individual
STORET monitoring data are excluded.

    The sample  tables consist  of three  pages for  each partition.  The
first page contains physical  information  taken  from  the  COE National
Inventory: the  location, power  rating of the hydroelectric installation
(if any),  normal volume,  hydraulic  dam  height,  and  maximum spillway
capacity.   Morphologic data, including estimates based on the regression
analysis discussed in the body of the report,  are also  included.  These
data include area, annual inflow, and length of the reservoir.  Note that
where data were obtained from other  sources, (i.e.,  EPA IMS  flow file,
agencies, or  by direct  measurement from  USGS topographical maps), they
replace the calculated estimates.   This  is done  throughout the tables.
Finally, the  first page of the tables provides the calculated Froude and
Phosphorus Retention Coefficient values.

    The second page of the sample tables contains information relevant to
the phosphorus  and eutrophication  analyses discussed in the body of the
report.  Data used in  the  application  of  the  Vollenweider  model are
checked.    The  upstream  phosphorus,  inpool phosphorus, and downstream
phosphorus data are averages based on the tabulated sample size.  The in-
pool  phosphorus  estimate  is  based  on the actual data, a Vollenweider
estimate, or usage of the downstream  level as  the best  estimate.  Also
shown  on  this  page  of  the  table is the probability of noncompliance
statistics for summer and winter for the appropriate stations.

    The third and final page of the sample tables consists of information
on where,  in relationship  to the  facilities, data for 15 water quality
parameters were found.   (The Case  Studies category  does not  have this
information.)   The data  were categorized by being upstream (U), in-pool
(P), or downstream (D).  The  table  reflects  that  data  may  have been
sampled  at  all  three  locations,  for  example, 6005 at the Beaver Dam
(AR00174), or found at  none, such  as TKN  at the  Cooper Dam (AK00001).
Notice that the location of the phosphorus information on the second page
of the tables are reflected under the column PHOS on page three.

    The case study table  consists of  one page  and combines information
similar  to  that  on  the  first  page  of  the  sample  tables with the
noncompliance data from the second page described above.

                                  B-l

-------
8  •
•3
vz
 235
 U M

?
ii
  H

^S


                   8  §     8
                                                   88
                                                                               Srt e
                                                                               in f
           O O
           ~f ^
           O 0s
       O ^ o -^ co -* i
       «-i «M -? O J1 r"
       fH CO O vO •*> -^ I
         o m i-« c*j i-<
         rH i—I     fM
                                         i       88
                j 1-4  «J I-H
                                                                               Sr*.
                                                                               eo
                                                                             CM ^-«  r»J
§QQ@?°S   2 5 °{
OOO9OC   O O O <
      rt O f* M •* -9 !

         « jj f^ rt f
OO
OO
                                               OQ
                                               OO
                                                          OOO
                                                          OOO
588
                  • cOf^^C-u-i^pn^H^OJ-'
                                   5^   00^»HfMCim.
      O M -H .
                ) O O O O C
                ) —. —t o O <
                            o i-< o o **i e
                                                                B-2

-------
                                                   O CO M CO   CO
         °
         d
                8   88S  ,    88388
                o   odd      ddddd
                                               8
                                               d
                                                      O O 8S  O
                                                      o o o o  o
                   •*    ""a       "*$  *
                   N    888  m    ^?58lS
                   d    odd  d    ddddd
                                            o
                                            d
                                                   M f-t O Q  n
                                                   mo OO  O
                                                   dddd  d
                                r-t -O 3 v
 M C* -J P4  rH  M 4
 o o o o  o  o o
 dddd  d  dddd  ddddd
                                         O O O W  O rH O
                                         o o o o  ooo
s
o
d
o
d
              iHir)tHOO-*O^^OC^-t
              Or^iHOrlOOOrH
              OOOOOOOOO
                                O O O O
                                o o o o
                                           Ul Qi O li
                                           o o o c
                                           OOOOOOOOO
                                               ) vO -* *O PJ
                                               ) r-4O O O
o o oo o
o
l-t
o
d
   oo o r- «
   O O O <
   d d ooo  o
              O  rHO
              d  do*
                      o> *o  ^
                      O O  rH
                      do  d
                      O O^ I/I   ^ O
                      ooo   So
                      ooo   o o
o
d
     in vo   o
l/l Jl  «H rH
O O  00
o o  o o
                                •4  -t P4
                                o  -»o
                                o  o o
              OOOOOOOOO
                                        OOOOOOOOO
                              B-3

-------

1
B
i
£
E
N02N03
|
z
g
P
2
CO
§""


o c
O.QQ 0.
1 3 1 BB33 1
Q OOO
till
o. a. o« o.
13133331
o oaoo
00.0,0.0.0.
i i i i i i
0.333 = 3 = 0
O. O.OO. O.
1 1 i 1 t
O. 1 3 30.3 3 1
OO O
0. 0.0.0. 0.
0.333333 1
O.
0.1 1 33 1 3 I
0
O. O.
I < 1 B 3 I 3 1

O.
O. 1 3 I i I3O

Q
3 1
i
O.
O
0.
3 >
O
1
o.
3 1
O
O
3 i

0
3 G*

O

C O
1 3 Q 33
O
O.Qa.e.
13333
O OO
O. O 0, O.
a
00.0
333
0. O
330.
00
i i
QO.O.

C
1 3
O
1 3
O
O 0.
i i
3 3
CO OO O
0.00.0.00.0.00.
0333333333
0 00
o. o o. o.
13333
O O 0.
1=31 =
O
O OB.
i 3333

O Q 0.
0 Q
OO.OOO.
B 3 O.3B
O
I
O.O
1 =0.
Q o
Q 0.0.
333

O
3 I OS 3 1 3336.

B 1


1 Q

O
1 B
O
O O. O
1 3 B 0.3 3
o
O Q OO.O
1 330.33
D QO
OO.Oa.0.
1 3 BO.B 3
O O
0. OO.Q
1 1 3 0.33
O O
O O. O O. O
1 3 3 0.3 3
Q O O
1 3 I 0.33
O O
O QO.O.
1 3 B 0.3 3
Q O
0, O.
i 1 30.3 B

O
1 1 1 1 B B 3
OOO.
1 i 1 1333
0.0. Q 00.
> 33 I 333

O
O O
( 1
0.0.
0 3
O Q
O. O.
33
O OO
O.O.QaOB.a.0.
1 1 i t i i i i
1 33333333
B. O OOOB.
1 30.3333
0
I I i 1313

0. O O
1 3O. 1 333

O
1 1 1 1 3 OB


O O O
333
Q
3
Q
B
O
3
Q O
B. O. O
i i 1
333
O O
B 0.
0
O 0.

B

O
333
O
O 0.

O
333
O
1 3
O
O O.
3 3

1 i

o
1 B
O O
1 3 0.3
Q
> B
Q
1 3


1 i


1 0.
33

B 3


1 3


1 3
                                                    i
                                                        ! t  I
     a o.     o o

    ! 33 I 3 OB a\
                      a  ao

                 oa oo. a0.0.

                 B33BB3B3
                                00              C

                           O  OO.O.   O.    OO   OO.O

                           300.33 >  30. I  BB33B3O I
        OO.  O   O O

0. IBIBBBCBIOBB I
                            O.
                                      O O
                                       I I
                              Q    O  O. O.

                              31  I 3 0.3 3 i
                                                O

                                          O O   O O. O

                                        I  BB3333OO. I  3
                  O   OO   QQ  O    O  OO            DO    O

                  0.00.0.00.0.00.  00.00.0,00.0.  000.0.0.000.0.0
  O O OOO   C
  i  i t  i  i   i
00.0.0.0.0.^.     __    _

3333330^100333333333 I 330.33333 I 3=333333 = 3
     C    O O

    131  >33
                                        O

                                        o, a

                                        3 3
                                                O    OOO

                                                3113133
   O

   o._
    I t
          OOOB.OO.OOO    =O  O  O.   OO  OOO

BBCB I CBBB333B3B > 3 = 0. I B I 33 I 33 = 333 I
                                                                 O

                                                                 3
            o5-*?£
            H 53 «-i r^ —

     KE  |3IS*«H
     lg!2giBHSg-
     2^3i|£<=i
     (CtJQHHZWKO
^ *P90 ^.
O "^ *^ *v *
                      jmoo^popppoooe
                         SPPPPOPPOOMOC
                         5o>-fiM"-«MZOHC
                   ; u. o o i-»»-» * :
                                              >«-4OO*"*~«<*^«*iO
                                              >PPPPOO — O
                                              >uuuu2zz<
                                              :ZOVIV>MHHS
                                                     8§§
                                           B-4

-------
Sri
      r*,r*cOO^COO>P  -TOh-     P

      «-4PPOOOOOO«CC  f* •-. CO     CO

      \n***G*O&r^r*r^  P CO r»-     -^
      oooooooo   ooo
                                      PPPPPPPPPPOP
      OOoPPOPo   f*i o P     co   mm^f-Hp^H.-HpooprMp


      OOOOOOOP   POP     *->   OPPPPPPPPPPP

                                                                       OPPPPP"-*-*






                                                                         §*G t** P P CO O **J

                                                                         r* r*. p p «-. '-*POpfocM-*cM»o-*fi*-pp-*i/.«»i
                      r-t CM     r*. r-
              \o fn p

              r- f> -J-
              m  «c
                                          op  p p 4np*oinpppinpmm<

                                                              2§ i-j 2 W	

                                                        _   _5i3u2g
                                                         -~t >H (ri BJ tri
                                                            < SBH B- <
                                                            3 3 3 » => U
                                                                         
-------
                             3  3
8   83   8   ,
o   o o   o
                         8  8
                         o  o
                                                           o o
                                                           o o*
8
o
8.   83   8   5
o   do   o   o
                         S  8
                         d  d
                                                           88
                                                           d d
O   iHO

d   do
                                 O

                                 d
                                                             1S
                                                             (*> O
                                                                O

                                                                C)
NO

do*
          O O

          do
                           sO r^ 
-------
i
CM
i
I
       i  i i  i i  i t  i a i
              o
              0. O
           Q i a a

              o
              0.0
              o a
              a. a.
              a a i

              c
              a. a.
       i  i i  i i a. i
              a. a.
               i i
             I a a i
  a                   a    c     a
  i                    iii
iaiaiiiiiii'i  taiaaioia
  a  a                a    a
  a.  a.                a,  a o,     a
  it                 i   i  i      i
ia>a	i i  i a i a. a i i  i a

  o                   c  aaa
  a.  a                o.  a. a, a.    a
a.3 i a. i i  i i  i a. a. i i  i i i a a a i  i a

  co                a    Q a
  &.  a.                a.  o a. a.    a
o, 3 3 3 i i  < 10.0.0.1 •  i 3 i o. a a »  ia

  o                   o
  0.0,      o.        a.  aa. o.    a
0.3 33 i '  > 1310,1 ,  laicLaai  ia
         I I  I I  I O t a
                   a  c
                   3 a &.
  a
  o,  a

  a
  c.  a
  a ao.
                                                       a  a  a
                                                       a.  o-Q a.    a
                                                    i  i=ii=>aaaia
                                                  a
                                                  a.
                                                 i a i
   a
a i a
            i " a o i a a c-

              c    c
              0. Q  C.  C
           o i a i j i &. c.
                                   a
                                   o.  a
                                 0.3 a o.
                           i  i a a o. i i  i  i
                              a
                              o.  o
                      a  a
                      o,  a. a     a
                      a i aaa a i a

                      c
                      £.0.     o
                      i i a a i  Q i a

                      a  aaa
                      L  a. 0,0,    a
                      a i a a a i  13
                                                       c.   o      a
                                                       a > a a i  a i a
        o:  ^> CM  o at
        O  §0  O S
        >  ii   « >  Z
        pc ^ in >c  o p£  <
        UroO^  ^HU  a    U
     WWO^N   LO    UW

     !5£oge0H£  1=  I
                      a  u    <
                      O 00 r-1    c
                      —< *^ FN  Z
                            < u
                      « « (K  c u;:
                      u u u    < i
                      eg pa m p u. j £
                            < < X X U
                            "il:
        ! a .
         niSuj?    E>»>«J2a
        • —jitf-JpepeuiceuHtt
               2uuo,u. u>-. .
                                              B-7

-------
•-> W
4J H
& <
a> r

                                           ^O r«J -3 O •*• O f-»
                                           CT* CO O O O ^O ^
                                     •> O CO tn O CO ••
                                     ^ O* O CO O CO (
                                     ) O*' O4- 0> O r*- t
       O O O O





       -H £) -1 #
       *H CO r- O
       in r* pg e\]


       O O -J O
                               OO--IOOO   OOO-HOOO  OOOOC3OO  O
  s in h.
  ) C1 ff-
  > m o
                O O >C O « -H
^e
     CM P^ rt «H
7|

O H
       t*-J  r-J r-l
                               CO fl O J^ O
                                 fl O J^
                                 fO r^ CO
  8O O CO
  n -* in
-f  J" rH
                m m o ^O fJ f*J
                O ^ CJ d ^ u*i
                •-• --i 00 * *n -J
            . rt o
            ) O O
1°
     O^^Minu^iOO^O'^*D^^OvOrHpnin^-ij>r>JOOiAeMOOJ-insOf-^COf^ino«-'O(O«3'C*rs)O
     «n fi J- (^1 .
            1 H8~
            H H X H
                H
              H VJ 0£
              i o: a.

              lie!
              : w c>
              •*  ^ w
              : 2^<

              lid"
             §
                                       s   B
                                     :»i«l
        oS-"'
        6.^N!

        e^s|
       > N ua  [
       :^2w(
                    M m —• i
                    f^ m m i
                    •& <*^ »• '
      j rJ rJ *o
      > r- CO ON
      - en & &•
      H M  u:
;§.
U < <   cJ Z C

^3Q   SSt
-3 3 CO U &
      ; e- &. 3 w -3 \o
               I Crt <
               o z a:
iiii
W W t/1 t
*: ^ &c :
                        sSdS
                        : H 3:
    3-5

    |^
    la
    < oc
                         i^gi
                                                   j —t W 0-
  !SS
  ) c
  •5r
 • O u.t

 '£  a
 ibX.
                                      5i!
> w o
iii
:u5
 u o


. 3 5 Z


ilii
                                 §OOi™"O — 'HO'^OO'^O'^C
                                 000*^0000000 — M<

                        J2^s252£»lEii£z";>H*'^-*'
                                             !SS2
                                             ;>^3
                                                 B-8

-------
                      8
                      d
                      5
                    o o o

                    o o o
                    o

                    o
     &BI
B 1;
       O*X   tnr*4Mr*m4
          gSNirti-(or^ eoo*c
          SBr^nin^-i*) a>o»
       JC  U-»n-<^mj-»j

       3iUHMMMUHu:
       .:>$;
      1S3  «!
      • H J t-t «, C
sa:
       33
       3 M M t
la^se;
              3
g
a

9

1  ^'
   iS
                 ;»
                        SB
                        O  OT
iiipi;
'   9 Q M •
iiiiiii
                                           4 r*. t» in •*it
                                           I M C1 r4 >-* <
                             B-9

-------
i
rJ

i
U.



w
                  IIQ|IIIIO*I3PII  I I  I  I I  It It
                                  Q


                                  =J3 i  i  i
                            t i  i  i a
 t-H *

                                 i»>Si
     JSS3K!
     ! a. c. a w .
                    : a a z
                    •'
                              :5
                              ; a

                              3 w --
: a. H

5S§
                                OO'-*O'-'^-'O'~'OO'—O-HOO — -H<*JrOf^—"^10

                                OOOMOOOOOOO-^(^OOOOOOOOOO
                               '>-->->-|£*:^ai
-------
O Uj
      OOCT*00\OO»   *O   r^ON  f^-CO
        J   (-1CM   ^   CM(M  i-HcM
        CO   <-*     f»         00 CO


        §i-HO'-*O   r-»   J^T-t  fMO
        OOOO   O   OCM  fH^H


      (DC3OOO   O   OO  OO
      00 00 *£ CO ON
      O O O O O

      O O O O O
in \o

o o
      CDC3OOC5OOOOOOOOOO
       ) O -4 O ^
       i o 1-13 ^
                   §88     888
                   MOO     O> O* O (
                   ro e»* tn     iH •* tn »
        OOO   OOOOOOONOO
        ONO   OOOOOOTHI^Oin
      CJf-fOOOOOOSOOOr-om
      ONONtnin-^oocootMf~-incMONi-H

                         sssss:
                         ) f-J O f- f» (
       00 00 CM iH i-4
         rHrHCOtn*  iH* O O O O O CM CO
         ^ j r-t IH*  o* m r« r-*. n 
-------
                               APPENDIX C
                           ANALYSIS SUPPLEMENT
    This appendix summarizes some of the analysis methods employed in the
technical analyses  including  a  mixing  model,  a  phosphorus retention
model,   physical   attribute   estimators,   and  a  discussion  on  the
significance of correlation, a discussion of sample size, a discussion of
how representative are the random samples with respect to the population,
and STORET water quality incidence summaries.
MIXING MODEL

    The densimetric Froude number represents the ratio of inertial forces
imposed  by  the  longitudinal  flow  to  gravitational  forces within an
impoundment and can be written for a reservoir as (USEPA, 1969):
    where:
                           F =
                               L • q
                                         g • 3
          L = reservoir length,

          q = average yearly discharge through the reservoir,

          D = mean reservoir depth,

          V = reservoir volume,

          o = reference density,

          3 = average density gradient in the reservoir, and

          g = gravitational constant.
    In deep  reservoirs,  the  fact  that  the  isotherms
indicates that  the inertia  of the  longitudinal flow is
disturb  the  overall   gravitational  static  equilibrium
reservoir, except  possibly for local disturbances in the
 are horizontal
insufficient to
 state  of  the
vicinity of the
reservoir outlets and at points of  tributary inflow.   Thus,  F would be
expected  to  be  small  for  such  reservoirs.    On  the other hand, in
completely mixed reservoirs, the  inertia of  the flow  and its attendant
turbulence is  sufficient to completely upset the gravitational structure

                                  C-l

-------
and destratify  the reservoir.    For reservoirs of this class, F would be
expected to  be large.    In  between these  two extreme  classes lies the
weakly-stratified  reservoir  in  which  the  longitudinal  flow possesses
enough  inertia  to   disrupt   the   reservoir   isotherms   from  their
gravitational static-equilibrium  state configuration,  but not enough to
completely mix the reservoir.

    For the purpose of classifying reservoirs  by their  Froude number, (3
and dp  may be  approximated as 0.001 kg/nr and 1000 kg/m^, respectively.
Substituting these values and g leads to an expression for F as:
                           F = 320 •
                                     L • q
                                         V
where L and D have units of meters, q is in cfs, and V  has units  of nr.
From this .equation it is observed that the principal reservoir parameters
that determine a reservoir's  classification are  its length,  depth, and
discharge to volume ratio (q/V).

    In developing  some familiarity with the magnitude of F for different
reservoir  situations,  it  is  helpful  to  note  that  theoretical  and
experimental  work  in  stratified  flow  indicates  that flow separation
occurs in a stratified fluid when  the Froude  number is  less than about
1/n (0.318).   For  example, for  F <  1/n, part  of the fluid will be in
motion  longitudinally  while  the  remainder  is  essentially  at  rest.
Furthermore, as  f becomes smaller and smaller, the flowing layer becomes
more and more concentrated in the  vertical direction.   Thus,  in a deep
reservoir,  it  is  to  be  expected that the longitudinal flow is highly
concentrated at values of F « 1/n.  While in the completely  mixed case,
F must  be at  least greater  than 1/n,  since the entire reservoir is in
motion, and it may be expected in general that F » 1/n.  Values of F for
the weakly-stratified  case would fall between these two limits and might
be expected to be on the order of 1/n.

    The Froude number,  written  in  the  units  found  in  the  Corps of
Engineers data base (feet, acre-feet, cubic feet per second) becomes:
                        F = 0.00735 •
L •  q

D •  V
    The only  variable in  the Corps  of Engineers  data base that can be
directly used  in this  formula is  the reservoir  volume, V.   The other
variables, L,  D, and  q, are  ancillary variables and must be estimated.
Estimates are derived in a  following  section  that  calculates  L  as a
function of V/H, D as a function of V/H, and q as a function of Q.  V, H,
and Q are basic variables in the Corps  of Engineers  data base:   normal
volume,  hydraulic  height  of  dam, and spillway capacity, respectively.
The estimators are shown to be statistically significant.
                                    C-2

-------
PHOSPHORUS RETENTION MODEL

    Although TVA recommends against using "models...assuming steady state
conditions and continuous stirred  tank reactor  behavior" for estimating
ambient  phosphorus  to  judge  TVA  reservoirs,  such models are common,
available, and seem useful for screening on a national scale (TVA,  1983).
One  would  not  use  such  a  model   to  make  control decisions without
considerable extra  site specific  study and  refinement.   One could use
"tank reactor  models" to  identify the possible presence of effects, and
if so, the extent of effects.

    One  such   "tank   reactor"   model,   attributed   to  Vollenweider
(Vollenweider,  1975),  and  presented  by Reckhow (USEPA, 1979), has the
operational feature that it can be utilized with the Corps  of Engineer's
data base.

    The Vollenweider  model presented  here can  be theoretically derived
from the annual phosphorus mass balance to any impoundment:
                        Pp = M
                                  (V
    where:
         Pp = the average annual  phosphorus concentration in  the pool  of
              the impoundment,

          M = the annual total phosphorus input to the impoundment, and

         Vs = the "apparent" settling velocity,

          A = the area of the bottom of the impoundment, which is assumed
              equal  to the normal pool surface area, and

          q = the average annual  inflow to the impoundment.


    Vollenweider implicitly identifies a constant settling velocity of Vs
equal to  10 meters/year.  A criticism of Vollenweider's approach is that
it is empiric, because Vs is estimated, and applies to northern temperate
situations.    Reckhow  observes   that Vollenweider's model  will  probably
overestimate Pp when high surface overflow  rates, Q/A,   are present, and
underestimate   Pp in  lakes that are highly enriched.  Reckhow discusses
model refinements that allow Vs to vary.

    However, the Vollenweider model   is dimensionally  sound and   is only
empirical with  respect to  selection of  Vs.   Furthermore,  it explains a
significant amount of the variance,  R2,  associated with  TVA samples (44
percent) and  associated with  sampling data in this report (51 percent).

                                    C-3

-------
These R^  values are  discussed in  detail  later in this appendix.   Thus,
although elementary, the Vollenweider has a place in screening reservoirs
and evaluation of national  eutrophication potential.

    The  Vollenweider  model   is  transformed  to  a  more useful  form by
dividing M by q and multiplying the terms in bracket by q.  This approach
results in  an expression  of the  Vollenweider model  that multiplies the
input average phosphorus concentration (M/q) by a dimensionless retention
coefficient, e.  The transformed model is given as:
                      PP=-
M

q
                                 (v
    Substituting Pj, the average annual  phosphorus concentration of input
flow to the impoundment, for the quotient M/q yields:
                      Pp = Pi
                                  (Vs •  A) + q
    The retention coefficient, e, is given as:
                         e =
                               (Vs •  A) + q
    The formula of the retention coefficient, e, for q (units of cfs) and
A (units of acres), assuming Vs = 10 meters/second, is
                        e =
                              (0.0453 •  A) + q
    Thus, if Vs is unbiased, a value of e = 0.33 implies that the average
inpool  lake  phosphorus  concentration  is  33 percent of the phosphorus
concentration of  reservoir  inflow  waters.    The  possible  bias  is a
concern, but  not a fatal flaw of this model, as long as it is identified
and adjustments are made.

    To sum up, one can estimate Pp directly or by  using the Vollenweider
retention  coefficient  times  the  input  phosphorus concentration.  The
estimate uses a prediction that  captures  a  significant  amount  of the
variation.   The prediction  is biased  by the  use of northern temperate
                                    C-4

-------
situations to establish Vs, and the bias can be dealt with by quantifying
it in the application to reservoirs  in the  United States.   Once  Pp is
estimated, the  EPA criterion of 0.025 mg/1 for phosphorus can be used to
evaluate the potential for eutrophication.  Furthermore, this approach is
useful only  for screening  purposes.   As such,  the progression to more
detailed analyses is necessary to evaluate specific sites  and to specify
need for and type of mitigation.
PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTE ESTIMATORS

    The Corps  of Engineers  data base  contains the following basic data
elements:

     V  =  the normal pool volume (acre-feet),

     H  =  the hydraulic height of the dam (feet), and

     Q  =  the spillway capacity of the dam (cfs'.

    As discussed earlier, the mixing model  estimates the  Froude number,
F, using  the following independent variables, L, D, q, and V.  Volume -is
the only variable contained in the  basic data.   The  Vollenweider model
estimates the  phosphorus retention coefficient, e, using the independent
variables, q and A,  neither of  which are  contained in  the basic data.
Therefore, to  estimate F  and e, using the Corps of Engineers data base,
estimates of L, D, q, and A as functions of V, H, and Q are necessary.

    To secure  such  estimates,  ancillary  data  for  L,  A,  and  q are
developed  for  subsets  of  the  random  sample of dams.  For reasons of
confidence, a sample of at least 30 out of the 120 random dams, plus case
study dams  given in  Appendix B,  is desired.  The following methods are
used:

         for L and A, the length and surface area of  the impoundment are
         measured  using  a  USGS  topographic  map.    The variables are
         converted to units of feet and acres.

         for q, the average annual flow is taken from the Reach File mean
         flow data.  The Reach File is linked to STORET and is an EPA in-
         house data file.  The unit of q is cfs.

         D, the average depth, is computed by dividing  V by  A.  The unit
         of D is feet.

    The ancillary  data for  L, A, and q,  for the several sites for which
these data  are  estimated,  are  presented  in  Appendix  B.    The site
selection  involved  application  of  engineering judgement to spread the
sites around the United States and across  power and nonpower dams.

    Once obtained, least squares, linear regression analysis is performed
to  estimate  the  fit.     The  models  are  specified,   a  priori,  to be

                                    C-5

-------
dimensionally sound  and are  constrained to have zero intercepts to give
logical  functional  relationships that are applicable to small  dams.

    Thus, q is estimated from Q.  A  is  estimated  from  V/H;  and   L is
estimated from  the square  root of  V/H.  The linear regressions, sample
sizes, and percentages of explained variation, R, are:

                q = 0.0647 • Q   (n = 64, R2 = 0.61),
                A = 2.88 •  -    (n = 30,  R2 = 0.59),  and
                           H
            L = 6.61 •
                         43560
                                    0.5
(n = 30,  R2 = 0.47)
    The units are in cfs for q and Q,  acres for A,  and feet for L and H.

    The three regressions are statistically significant  and are  used to
estimate F and e.  A discussion of the significance of R2 follows.
SIGNIFICANCE OF CORRELATION

    The  correlation  coefficient,  R,  measures the strength of a linear
relationship between two variables.    For  R  =  1,   the  relationship is
exactly linear  whereas R = 0 indicates no relationship.  Therefore, as R
approaches unity, a linear relationship approaches exactitude.

    The  square  of  the   correlation  coefficient,   R2,  measures  the
percentage of  the variation of a dependent variable that is explained by
its linear relationship  with  an  independent  variable.    Variation is
defined  in  statistical  terms  as  variance  which is the square of the
standard deviation.

    Therefore, if SD(y) is the standard deviation of a random variate, y,
and SE(yjx)  is the standard error of predictions associated with a least
squares regression of y on x, a dependent  variable, then  the percentage
of explained variation is expressed as:

                     ,   [SD(y)]2 - [SE(y|x)]2
                    R2 =	
                              CSD(y)]2
                                    C-6

-------
    The difference  in the numerator is the variance or variation that is
conditionally explained by the least squares regression of y and  x.   The
square root of R2 is considerably less than R.
    How does one judge the significance of R2 with respect to sample size
n?   Kendall  presents  a  logarithmic  transform  of  R  that approaches
normality  (Kendall   and  Stuart,  1963).    The transform, attributed to
Fisher, is given as:
                        z = 0.5 • loge
whose standard deviation is:

                         SD(z) = 1 / (n - 3)°-5

    Because z tends to normality, the normal probability distribution can
be used  to test the hypothesis that R is rot equal to zero, and hence, a
relationship is significant.   At the 95 percent  confidence interval, the
following values  of R2,  depicted below  in Table  C-l, are necessary to
infer that a relationship is significant using Fishers' z.


            Table C-l.  Sample Sizes for 95% Significant R2.
                n, sample size
R2 above which R can be
deduced to be nonzero, and
hence, significant,  with
95 percent confidence.
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
100
40%
26%
20%
16%
13%
10%
8%
4%
    To place correlation results presented in  this report  into context,
the various R2s and sample sizes are summarized in Table C-2.
                                C-7

-------
             Table C-2.   Significance of Elementary Models.
Relationship
q vs Q **
A vs [V/H1 c **
L vs [V/H]°-5 **
STemp vs Froude F*
Measured P vs
Vollenweider *
Measured P vs
Vollenweider **
R2
61%
59%
47%
68%
44%
51%
n
64
30
30
22
11
22
95% Confidence
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
              TVA Data.
              Relationships derived
              this report.
               in  various  sections  of
SAMPLE SIZE

    Is a sample of 40 dams adequate to represent the finite population of
424 large power dams?  For estimating the effects of dams,  the goal  is to
find how many dams have significant  effects and  how many   do not.    The
answer  depends  upon  statistical   reasoning.   The statistician asks the
question:  What sample size will  provide given  confidence intervals?

    In other words, once you take  your sample   of n,  you  want  to  be 95
percent certain  (that is, you want the estimate to be right 19 out  of 20
times if you would repeat the random sample 20  times) that  your answer is
within a particular error bound.

    This  problem  can  be  theoretically formulated, like  a coin tossing
experiment, with the Hypergeometric distribution.  The error  bound  at 95
percent certainty  is approximately plus or minus two standard deviations
of the standard deviation of the  Hypergeometric distribution  because it
approaches normality (Kendall and Stuart, 1963).

    The standard deviation of the Hypergeometric distribution is:
               SD =
n(p) '  (1 - P)
                                                  0.5
                                 C-8

-------
where:

     n = number of random samples,

     p = fraction of  the population  having a  particular attribute; for
         example, p = 0.5 indicates 50%  of the  population possesses the
         attribute, and

     N = the size of the finite population.

    Applying this  Hypergeometric formulation  to the  sample of 40 large
power dams out of the total population of  424- of  such dams,  assume the
attribute of  interest has  a frequency  of 50 percent or p = 0.5.  Thus,
the assumption is that low dissolved  oxygen in  tailwaters, for example,
is present  in 50  percent of all large power dams.  For this assumption,
the standard deviation of  the  Hypergeometric  distribution  is  3 dams.
Twice the standard deviation is 6 dams.  The expected number of dams is p
x n which for a sample of 40 with p = 0.5 is 20.

    Therefore, out of a sample of  40 of  a population  with an attribute
with 50  percent frequency,  one would  expect between  20-6 and 20+6
dams (the expected  value  plus  or  minus  two  standard  deviations) to
possess the attribute with 95 percent confidence.  In other words, the 95
percent confidence range is 14 to 26 dams.  A  random sample  of 40 would
fall within  this range with 95 percent certainty.  With the same logic a
random sample of 40 would fall within a range of 15 to 25 with 90 percent
certainty.

    With  regard  to  the  need  for partitioning the population into the
three subsets, large power, large nonpower,  and small:   assume  that an
attribute  is  frequent  in  a  small subset and infrequent in the entire
population.  For example,  let the  small subset  be the  424 large power
dams  and  the  population  be  the  68,155  dams.    Further, assume the
attribute frequency is 50 percent of the large power dams and 2.5 percent
of the  population; the  attribute of significant dissolved oxygen change
in dam tailwaters is a good  example  having  high  subset  frequency and
presumed  low  population  frequency.   Thus, the partitioning places the
attribute in a subset sample range of 14 to 26  dams with  n =  40, but a
representation of the attribute in the larger population, with 95 percent
confidence, implies a range of 0 to 3 with a high probability  on 0.   To
sum  up,  the  number  of  40 random subset dams possessing the attribute
would fall in the range 14 to 26, and the number of  40 random population
dams  in  the  range  0  to  3.   One would stand a sizable chance of not
identifying the attribute at all in a sample of 40 of the population.
SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVENESS

    Do the  forty dams  distributed in  each of  three samples adequately
reflect the  locational distribution  of the  associated population?  The
samples  are  classified  by  geographic  region.    The   first  region,
Northeast,  is  defined  as  EPA  regions  I, II, III, and V.  The second

                                C-9

-------
region,  designated  as South,   contains EPA regions IV and VI.   The final
region,  West,  is defined as EPA  regions  VII,   VIII,   IX,  and  X.   The
comparison of the samples and  the populations are illustrated in Table C-
3.   Generally, it can be seen  that the proportion of the  observations in
sample  regions  are  approximately  equal   to   those   of  the  population
regions.

                               Table C-3.
                   Summary of  Geographic Distribution.
CLASSIFICATION
Large Power
Sample
Population
Large Nonpower
Sample
Population
Small Dam
Sample
Population
REGION
Northeast
8 (20%)
110 (26%)
16 (40%)
589 (35%)
11 (28%)
15478 (23%)
South
15 (38%)
139 (33%)
11 (28%)
488 (29%)
12 (30%)
25320 (38%)
West
17 (42%)
175 (41%)
13 (32%)
624 (36%)
17 (42%)
25232 (39%)
Total
40
424
40
1701
40
66030
    Do  the  sample  frequency  distributions  represent  the  population
frequency of all dams in each partitioned subset?  The Kolmogorov-Smirnov
(KS) test is applied to answer this inquiry  (Kendall  and  Stuart, 1963).
Figure C-l  shows the  cumulative distributions of V (normal pool volume)
of the population and the sample for large power dams.   On  the vertical
axis  is  the  cumulative  frequency  or  probability.    The  cumulative
frequency times 100 represents the "percent equal to or less  than."  The
horizontal axis for Figure C-l represents the volume.

    The  KS  test  involves  determining  the  maximum  vertical distance
between two frequency curves such as  illustrated  in  Figure  C-l.   For
example,  for  the  large  power  sample and population distribution, the
maximum vertical distance is  0.15  cumulative  probability  units.   The
value 0.140 is the KS test statistic.  If this statistic is less than the
value 0.210 (the cumulative  probability units  associated with  a sample
size  of  40  and  a  significance  level  of 95 percent), the sample and
population distributions are statistically similar.

    In other words, the KS test compares the continuous distribution of a
population  to  the  continuous  distribution  of  a sample.  The maximum
difference  between  the  two   distribution   functions   is    itself  a
distribution as  a function of sample sizes and significance levels.  The
value of the maximum difference  distribution  is  compared  to  tabulated
                                 C-10

-------
values  of this  distribution  for  various  sample  sizes and  levels of
significance.  If the  level of  significance value  is greater  than the
maximum difference, the sample is a representative, significant  sample of
the  population.  The distributions  are  checked  with  the  KS  test for
volume,  Froude  number,  phosphorus retention coefficient, and  installed
power.  The results are depicted in Table C-4.
           Volume  Distributions
                     (large power  dams)
      Cumulato.ua Probability
.98


.98


. 88


.78


.68


58
                                                      KS Statistic =0.15  !
                                                      n = 48
                                                      N = 424
          i.88«+88i i.aa«»882 i.ae«+ea3 i.
                           Figure C-l.
               Volume Distributions (large power dams)
                            C-ll

-------
                               Table  C-4.
            Results of the  KS  Test  for  Sample Distributions.
              Distribution
            Normal  Volume  (V)

            1.   Large Power
            2.   Large Nonpower
            3.   Small  Combined

            Froude  Number

            4.   Large Power
            5.   Large Nonpower
            6.   Small  Combined

            Phosphorus Retention
             Coefficient (e)

            7.   Large Power
            8.   Large Nonpower
            9.   Small  Combined

            Installed Power

           10.   Large Power
 KS Test
Statistic
  KS 95 Percent
Significant Level
  0.15
  0.14
  0.17
  0.13
  0.15
  0.14
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
  0.12
  0.10
  0.12
  0.12
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
      0.21
      Note:   All  10 distributions are significant at 95 percent level.
STORE! WATER QUALITY RETRIEVAL SUIflARIZATIONS

    This section  presents information  on the  STORET parameters and the
incidence of data at the three classes of dams and the incidence of water
quality  observations  at  dams  for  which  data are present.  Table C-5
presents the water quality parameters.

    Tables C-6 and C-7 illustrate the distribution of  the data  for each
of the three categories, (L-P, L-NP, S), at upstream (U), downstream (D),
and Pool (P) locations.   Table  C-6 shows  the number  of dams reporting
data.    The  large  power  dams  have  the  largest  average  number  of
observations per parameter.  The large nonpower dams are next.   The data
for  small  dams  are  sparse.    Table  C-7 shows the average numbers of
observations per dam.
                                C-12

-------
                               Table C-5.
                        Water Quality Parameters.
Parameters
Fishkill

Stream Flow
Mean Daily

Dissolved Oxygen
Probe
Winker

Phosphorus
Total (as P)

Nitrogen
Total (as N)
TKN
N03 + N02
Turbidity
Jackson Candle

Storet #
1340


60


299
300


665


600
625
630

70

Units
dead fish


cfs


mg/1
mg/1


mg/1


mg/1
mg/1
mg/1

mg/1

Parameters Storet #
Water Temperature
Celsius

Iron (Fe)
Dissolved
Total (as Fe)

Manganese
Dissolved
Total

Hydrogen Sulfide
as H2S

Chlorophyll A
as Chi -a
BOD5

Dissolved Solids

10


1045
1046


1056
1055


71875


32230
310

70301
Units

degrees


ug/1
ug/1


ug/1
ug/1


mg/1


mg/1
mg/1

mg/1
                               Table C-6.
                     Number of Dams Reporting Data.

Parameter*
DO
Manganese Total
Iron Total
Nitrogen Total
TKN
Phosphorus
Temperature
Upstream (U)
L-P
33
22
24
19
30
28
33
L-NP
10
9
9
4
10
11
12
S
2
2
2
0
1
2
3
Pool (P)
L-P
23
12
11
7
19
22
24
L-NP
14
8
9
3
12
13
14
S
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
Downstream (D)
L-P
33
19
22
12
27
27
33
L-NP
12
9
10
2
11
11
13
S
3
1
2
0
2
3
3
*Data were found for other parameters,  but much less frequently.
                                C-13

-------
                               Table  C-7.
                 Average  Number of Observations  per  Dam
                       for  Dams Reporting  Data.

Parameter*
DO
Manganese Total
Iron Total
Nitrogen Total
TKN
Phosphorus
Temperature
Upstream (U)
L-P
596
330
310
292
269
358
656
L-NP
232
34
63
35
122
288
491
S
6129
102
110
-
2
16
171
Pool (P)
L-P
693
104
102
83
147
157
693
L-NP
464
82
94
49
90
89
995
S
45
-
-
-
3
3
45
Downstream (D)
L-P
331
57
61
56
86
142
343
L-NP
215
71
895
22
85
115
209
S
111
2532
66
-
95
39
120
*Data were found for other parameters,  but much  less frequently.
                                C-14

-------
                               APPENDIX 0
                      LARGE NONPOWER DAM SUPPLEMENT
    The  large  nonpower  dams  classification consists of 1701 dams with
over 10,000 acre*feet of  storage at  the normal  pool elevation  with no
reported  installed  power.     These  dams  may or may not have low level
outlets which transmit water quality effects downstream.

    Four analytical efforts  were performed  on  large  nonpower  dams for
this  report:    Mixing  Analysis; Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations in Dam
Tailwaters; Upstream/Downstream  Comparisons;  and  Phosphorus Enrichment
Analysis.  The mixing analysis is presented in Chapter III, but the other
three efforts are presented  here because insufficient data were available
to draw conclusions based on these analyses.
MIXING ANALYSIS

    These results  are presented  in Chapter III based on numbers of dams
with F < 0.3.
DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAM TAILWATERS

    This method of analysis, described in detail in Chapter III, is based
upon a  U.S. Department  of Energy  supported study done by the Oak Ridge
National  Laboratory.    Probabilities   of  non-compliance,   i.e.,  the
probabilities that  dissolved oxygen  concentrations in the tailwaters of
dams will drop below 5 mg/1, were determined by the  Oak Ridge Laboratory
for  TVA  dams,  and  using  the  same  methodology,  the results of this
analysis for large nonpower dams is presented in Table D-l.

UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY

    This analysis, described  in  detail  in  Chapter  III,  involved the
collection  of  water  quality  data  on sample dams from STORET, and the
comparison of up and downstream data for each site, when  available.  The
results  of  comparing  water  quality  means for large nonpower dams are
presented in Table D-2.  Twenty-five  percent,  or  less,  of  the random
sample  have  water  quality  data  both  upstream  and downstream of the
impoundment.
                               D-l

-------
                         Table D-l.
Probabilities of Non-Compliance with 5 nig/1 Dissolved  Oxygen
                   for Large Nonpower Dams.
Summer Season
Location
Great Basin
Great Plains
Hawaii
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
Mean

n
_
1
-
-
2
3
7
1
1
PNC
_
0.020
-
-
0.000
0.033
0.073
0.070
0.000
0.033
Winter Season
Great Basin
Great Plains
Hawaii
Lake States
Northeast
Ohio Valley
Pacific Coast
Rocky Mountain
Southeast
Mean

_
1
-
-
2
3
7
-
1
_
0.010
-
-
0.010
0.000
0.027
-
0.000
0.009
                          D-2

-------
                                  Table D-2
                      Tallies of Water Quality Changes
                           In Large Nonpower Dams



Parameter
Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved Oxygen*
Iron
Manganese
Phosphorus
TKN
Total Nitrogen
Dams
Lacking
Necessary
Data
30
31
31
34
36
31
31
38
Dams


Total
with Upstream and


Having Signifi
Data Increase
10
9
9
6
4
9
9
2
4
3
0
2
2
2
1
1
Downstream Data


cant
Decrease
3
4
2
2
0
2
2
0


Insignifi-
cant**
3
2
7
2
2
5
6
1
* nearest station to dam
** indicates no change in water quality
PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS

    The  results  of  the  phosphorus  enrichment  analysis, described in
detail in Chapter III, for large nonpower dams  are as  follows.   Of the
forty sample dams, 24 had no phosphorus data whatsoever, seven had inpool
phosphorus concentration less than the suggested EPA "Gold Book" guidance
value of  0.025 mg/1,  while nine  had concentrations  greater than 0.025
mg/1.
                                  D-3

-------
                               APPENDIX E
                          SMALL DAM SUPPLEMENT
    The small  dam classification  consists of 66,030 dams with less than
10,000 acre-feet of storage.   Four analytical  efforts  were performed for
this  report:    Mixing  Analysis; Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations in Dam
Tail waters;  Upstream/Downstream  Comparison;   and  Phosphorus Enrichment
Analysis.  The results of these analyses follow.

MIXING ANALYSIS

    The mixing  analysis, explained in detail  in Chapter III, categorizes
the stratification potential  in  the impoundments.   The  spillway design
for small  dams may  be based on different criteria than large dams.  One
criteria utilizes the maximum probable flood (U.S. Dept. of the Interior,
1977).    Furthermore,  it  appears  that  many designs of small dams use
standard designs  (such as  a 24-inch  outlet pipe)  for a  wide range of
hydrologic conditions.   Design  criteria could result in highly variable
maximum  spillway  discharges  which  would,  in   turn,  result   in  an
undesirable  variation  in  the  Froude  number.   These small dam Froude
numbers  may  not  accurately  predict  the  mixing  potential  of  small
impoundments.

    However, the  linear estimate  of average flow is dimensionally sound
and has been constrained to a zero intercept to allow estimates for small
values.    Also  there  are  several  small  dams in the data utilized to
develop the linear estimate.     With  these  various  qualifications, the
numbers of  small dams  with  F < 0.3, the TVA suggested criteria,  is 9954
out of  66,030 dams;  data are  missing (F  could not  be calculated) for
18,143 dams.
DISSOLVED OXYGEN IN DAM TAILWATERS

    This analysis was not performed for small dams.


UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY

    There are  66,030 "small"  dams having  less than 10,000 acre-feet of
normal pool volume comprising 96.8 percent of the population of  Corps of
Engineers dams.   Although the maximum normal volume is 10,000 acre-feet,
the median normal volume  is 70  acre-feet, and  one of  the lower limits
(the other  being dam  height) of the Corps of Engineers 1980 census is a
pool volume of 50 acre-feet.  Thus, about  half the  small  dam population
have volumes  less than 70 acre-feet.  On the average,  these dams are 199

                                  E-l

-------
        the  size of  the largest  "large"  dam in the partitioned sample.
That is, the "large" dams start at 10,000  acre-feet, and  the small  dams
are typically 100 acre-feet - a 100-fold difference.

    Of the  40 small  random dams  in the sample, only 5 had some form of
water quality data.    Therefore,  there  is  very  little  water quality
monitoring evidence to indicate the effects of small  impoundments.  Since
monitoring resources  are  usually  focused  on  problem  areas,   lack of
monitoring may  suggest that either a site  has no water quality problems,
or that the water quality extent of the site effects  is limited.

    One can ask the  question,  how  do small  impoundments behave?   This
question arose in the 1970s relative to concerns for  filing EIS documents
to support new dam construction.   Several  intensive   SCS studies  in the
southeast  (Moore,  1973;  SCS,  1978;  SCS,  1987) provide site specific
answers.

    In Arkansas, a 4000 acre-feet water supply reservoir 20 feet deep, on
the  average,  is  strongly  stratified.    The Prairie Grove Lake showed
extensive periods of zero  dissolved oxygen  in the  hypolimnion combined
with resulting solution of iron and manganese (Moore, 1973).  The concern
is the utility of the impoundment for municipal water supply.  A masters'
thesis (Kerr,  1977) followed up by experimenting with bottom withdrawals
to unsuccessfully promote impoundment  mixing.   Apparently, however, low
dissolved oxygen  hypolimnetic waters are aerated in  the splash following
freefall down a morning glory spillway - essentially  a vertical pipe with
an elbow  at the base leading to a horizontal discharge pipe which passes
through the dam.  Kerr fabricated a shroud  to fit over the  vertical  pipe
to allow bottom withdrawals.  The withdrawals splash  at the elbow.

    This form of small dam release detail,  a vertical pipe with an outlet
elbow, is common in dams built following SCS suggestions, as is the elbow
splash and  resultant aeration.   Thus,  in general,   small morning glory
spillways,  whether  or  not  they  handle   bottom  or   surface  waters,
apparently provide aeration to tailwaters.

    Extensive data  gathering at  four small  impoundments in Mississippi
provide insight to small impoundment  behavior   (SCS,  1978).    The four
projects have  average water  depths of 6 to 40 feet and volumes of about
200  to  8000  acre-feet.    All  of  them   stratified  creating  anoxic
hypolimnions.   If they had surface releases (3 out of 4), the tailwaters
are warmer than inflows and have higher dissolved  oxygen.   The behavior
is consistent  with a  theory of  surface warming and either algal oxygen
production  or  splash  aeration  of  discharges,  or  both.     The  one
impoundment with   low level  outlets had  low dissolved oxygen, iron, and
manganese in solution.

    Thus, it appears that small  impoundments can and do have poor quality
hypolimnetic waters.   If  they  have  low level outlets, these waters are
transmitted downstream.  In the Mississippi studies,  1 out of  4 dams had
low level  outlets.  A further  insight is the 4 Mississippi sites all had
high levels of phosphorus in their inflows and impoundments.  This may be

                                 E-2

-------
a   characteristic   of   rural,   agricultural   regions   having  small
impoundments.  In a watershed management context, such small impoundments
may filter  phosphorus out  of runoff  and aid  the phosphorus control in
downstream dams.

    In Alabama, a study of the influence of flood control impoundments on
water  quality  by  the  SCS  provides additional insight into small dams
(SCS, 1983).   In  Alabama,  there  are  more  than  80  structures which
discharge  only  surface  waters,  but  there are only two which normally
release flows from the cooler bottom waters.  The incidence  of low level
outlets is 2 out of 80 for small Alabama flood control dams.  The Alabama
impoundments tended to be  stratified  with  a  noticeable  difference in
dissolved oxygen  and temperature  - top to bottom.  The surface releases
tended to be warmer, as reported for the four Mississippi dams.

    Specific details  of the  five random  small dams  provide the reader
with additional  insights into the small dam situation.  For example, one
of the random dams is a "dry" dam holding water  only during  floods.  At
least one  percent (742) of the small dams in the Corps of Engineers data
base are of this type.  Up to an additional two percent (1137) could also
be dry  dams because normal storage volumes are not recorded in the Corps
data base.  Dry dams and, for that matter, many navigation-^ projects, are
not  expected  to  cause  significant  downstream water quality problems.
Additional details of the  five random  small dams  follow (water quality
data are summarized in Appendix B):

Parizek Pond Dam:  CT00646

    Parizek Pond  dam, completed in 1870, impounds Parizek Pond.  The dam
is located at 41°52.9'  latitude  and  72°17.3'  longitude  in Willington
County, Connecticut.   The dam is of earthen, gravity construction with a
structural height of 15  feet and  a hydraulic  height of  12 feet.   The
length  along  the  crest  of  the  dam  is 400 feet with an uncontrolled
spillway 11 feet wide.   A  maximum flow  of 30  cfs empties  into Conant
Brook  from  the  impoundment.    The  maximum  storage  capacity  of the
impoundment is 61 acre-feet with a  normal volume  of 56  acre«feet.  The
major purpose  of the  dam is to provide recreational opportunities.  The
dam and  impoundment are  privately owned  and maintained  by William and
Mary Parizek.  The data on record pertaining to Parizek Pond comes from 8
stations, 3 downstream and 3 upstream.  The data indicate a low  level of
dissolved oxygen downstream below 5 mg/1 and nutrient enrichment (mean
     IA total  of 130  dams in  the Corps data base are denoted as having
one or more locks,  while a  total of  329 dams  are reported  to serve a
navigational  purpose.    The  data  base  appears  to  be incomplete and
inconsistent on this point.  The Corps of Engineers (Kennedy and Gaugush,
1987) state  that lock  and dams  comprise 26  percent of 783 Corps water
resources projects, or approximately 200.  Furthermore, the 130 locks and
dams in  the Corps safety inventory are not a subset of the 329 reporting
a navigation purpose.

                                 E-3

-------
phosphorus  concentration  of  0.12  mg/1)   may  be found downstream.  No
statistical difference between upstream  and  downstream  temperatures is
observed at the 90 percent confidence level.

KSNONAME 1335:  KS01335

    The dam, located at 38°26.7'  latitude and 96°20.5'  longitude in Chase
County, Kansas, was completed in  1967.   The earth construction  dam has a
structural  height  of  16  feet   and  a  hydraulic  height  of  15 feet,
restraining an unnamed small  stock or farm pond.   The crest length of 620
feet contains  an uncontrolled spillway discharging a maximum flow of 636
cfs into Beaver Creek.  The maximum storage  capacity of  the pond  is 83
acre-feet with  a normal   volume  of  42 acre-feet.    The  dam is owned by
Kellam and regulated by DWR.   The recorded data comes  from 12 downstream
stations.   The data  indicate a  mean dissolved oxygen content downstream
above 5 mg/1 and  possible  nutrient  enrichment  downstream.    Iron and
manganese levels are high downstream, well  over the maximum threshold.

Tyner Lake Dam:  KY00271

    Tyner Lake  Dam, located  at  37°22.6' latitude and 83°54.8' longitude
in Jackson County, Kentucky,  impounds the Flat Lick Creek Reservoir.  The
dam was  completed in 1969 and is of earth construction with a structural
height of 69 feet and a hydraulic height of 67 feet.  The dam has a crest
length  of  1030  feet  with  an   uncontrolled  spillway  100  feet wide,
discharging a maximum flow of 3207 cfs into Flat Lick Creek.  The maximum
storage capacity  of the reservoir is 3250 acre-feet with a normal volume
of 2365 acre-feet.  The system is intended to provide  a source  of water
as  well  as  serving  as  a  recreational   facility.    It  is owned and
maintained by the Jackson  County Water  Association.   The data recorded
comes from 1 station in the pool.  These data indicate a dissolved oxygen
content marginally below 5 mg/1 and low phosphorus levels.

Hodges Village Dam:  MA00967 (Dry Dam)

    The Hodges Village Dam,  completed in  1959,  impounds  Hodges Village
Pond.   The dam,  located at  42°07.2'  latitude and 71°52.8' longitude in
Oxford County, Massachusetts, is   primarily  of  earth  construction with
rockfill and  gravity design,  with a  structural height of 55 feet and a
hydraulic height of 50 feet.   The  crest  length  is  2050  feet  with an
uncontrolled spillway  145 feet  in width  discharging a  maximum flow of
25,800 cfs into the French River.   The  maximum storage  capacity of the
impoundment  is  26,000  acre-feet  with  a normal  volume of 0 acre-feet.
This dam was constructed for flood control  purposes  as indicated  by the
normal storage volume.

Sanitation Dam:  MI01262

    The dam,  located at  42°31'  latitude  and 84°39' longitude in Ingham
County, Michigan, was completed in 1918.  It is a  gravity-type structure
with a  hydraulic height  of 2 feet.  The crest length is 150 feet with a
130 feet spillway which  discharges into  the Grand  River.   The unnamed
                                 E-4

-------
impoundment has  a normal   storage capacity  of 8 acre-feet.   This dam is
apparently below Corps of Engineers thresholds for safety  reporting, and
its presence in the data base may indicate overzealousness on the part of
the census taker.  The dam is owned  and regulated  by the  City of Eaton
Rapids.   Three upstream  stations provide  data on water quality.  These
data  indicate  an  upstream  dissolved  oxygen  content  above  5  mg/1,
phosphorus enrichment upstream,  and high iron and manganese content.

    The situation  for small  dams is water quality data are only present
for 12.5 percent (or 5) of  the  random  sample of  small dams.   However,
site specific studies in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Alabama all indicate:

         Small dams stratify and develop anoxic epilimnions.

         Small dams  with surface  outlets tend  to have higher dissolved
         oxygen and temperature  in tail waters than in inflows.

         Small dams  with  low-level   outlets  show  decreasing dissolved
         oxygen downstream and the presence of iron and manganese.

         The incidence  of low-level   outlets is low in the site specific
         situations investigated:   1  low-level outlet  in 4 Mississippi
         sites and 2 low-level outlets in over 80 Alabama sites.

         The typical  morning glory vertical outlet with 90° outlet elbow
         seems to  generate  a  splash  at  the  elbow  that  aerates the
         tailwaters.
PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS

    The  results  of  the  phosphorus enrichment analysis as described in
Chapter III are rather sparse.  For small dams, the  random sample  of 40
only had  4 dams with pool  estimates of phosphorus.  Of these four, 3 had
phosphorus  levels  over  the  0.025  mg/1  critical  threshold.    The 4
Mississippi dams with site  specific data all had high pool concentrations
of phosphorus.  They also had  high inflow  concentrations of phosphorus.
Small dams  are higher  in  watersheds  and nearer  to nonpoint sources of
enrichment.  They also tend to  filter  or  "screen  out"  the phosphorus
concentrations with  the result  that downstream  inputs of phosphorus to
larger dams is less than the setting when small dams are absent.
REMARKS

    The analysis of small  dams is hampered by a
However, the following items are enlightening:
lack  of monitoring data.
         The small   dams are  only half as likely to stratify and thus be
         poorly mixed based on population estimates.
                                E-5

-------
         Site specific  studies in  the southeast do show that small  dams
         stratify.  Low-level  outlets from small  dams are associated with
         tailwater  water  quality  effects.     Surface  outlets  exhibit
         tail waters with increased dissolved  oxygen and temperature.

         The incidence of low-level  outlets in  small dams  appears to be
         low in  small dams  - on  the order  of less than 3 percent for a
         sizable sample in Alabama.

    Insufficient  data  are  obtained  to  draw  quantitative conclusions
pertaining to small dams.  What evidence exists quantitatively,  points to
a situation of widespread enrichment of small  dam reservoirs.
                                E-6

-------
                              APPENDIX F
                           CORPS OF ENGINEERS
                         WATER RESOURCE PROJECTS
                        WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
                             SUPPLEMENT
GENERAL

     The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as one of the principle Federal
water resource development agencies, owns and operates over 700 water
resource projects consisting primarily of reservoirs and locks and
dams.  The Corps civil works responsibilities began with an Act of
Congress in 1824 for the improvement of rivers  and harbors for
navigation.  Other acts expanded the legislative basis for Corps
participation in the various functional areas of water management.

     Today, the Corps carries out a comprehensive water resources
planning, engineering, construction and operations effort in close
cooperation with government agencies at all levels and a wide variety
of civic and private interests.  This program involves coordinated
management of water resources in a manner that addresses all
water-related requirements, both immediate and long-range.  These
requirements include flood control, navigation, hydropower, water
supply, water quality, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement.
The allocation of storage and authorities to regulate these projects
are specified in legislative authorization acts for specific Corps
projects, as well as project and reservoir system documents.

     Inceased public concern for the environment and recognition that
natural resources are both interrelated and finite, resulted in the
incorporation of considerations other than economic efficiency into
legislation for water recource development and management.
Environmental considerations such as water quality improvement and
management, and fish and wildlife requirements, were manadated by
legislation, and are incorporated into authorized project purposes and
operating plans, as well as Corps of Engineers regulations.
                                      F-l

-------
     Water control policy and management in the Corps of Engineers has
undergone significant changes in response to evolving environmental
concerns.  Many of these changes have been directly in response to
Federal environmental legislation.  Reservoir design and operation
activities which once focused solely on quantitative aspects, are now
sensitive to broader environmental considerations.  Water quality is an
important consideration during all phases of Corps project development,
and an, integral part of the decision processes related to reservoir
operations.

     Water control management programs provide the means for operating
Corps projects to meet their authorized purposes.  Most of the Corps'
projects are authorized for multiple purposes, (e.g. flood control,
navigation and recreation) and over 60 Corps of Engineer projects
include water quality as an authorized project purpose.  Flow
augmentation for industrial and municipal pollution abatement, acid
mine drainage abatement, and other purposes which relate to water
quality, are often included in flood control and navigation projects.
Water quality management objectives have been developed for each
project and incorporated into Corps water control programs wherever
possible.

     The Corps recognizes that project regulation often plays a
significant role in influencing downstream environmental and water
quality conditions.  Sensitivity to the effects of water control
activities on the environment is the cornerstone of the Corps'
initiatives for integrating water quality and environmental
considerations into water control management.

     Experience gained over the last decade, through water control
management activities and Corps research and development efforts, has
contributed to a growing information base for designing and operating
reservoir projects to manage water quality.  A large portion of these
research efforts were conducted as part of the Environmental and Water
Quality Operational Studies Program, an eight year effort which was
initiated by identifying technology and information needs for solving
environmental problems and meeting the responsibilities of legislative
and executive directives.
                                      F-2

-------
    This work, which was completed  in 1985,  produced a bettei
understanding of  the effects of  reservoirs on water and envmararential.
quality.  Some of the efforts under this program addressed processes
involved in  inflow mixing,  internal reservoir mixing and suspended;
solids distribution.  Methods for predicting environmental changass and
alternatives for  managing water  and environmental quality were=
evaluated.  Predictive  techniques were developed for describing.
reservoir hydrodynamics, loadings to reservoirs and for detecmi'niTMg iffee
ecological effects of reservoir  project operation.  A variety  of otflnst
areas were also included in this program, and the resulting teehnolicagy
and criteria has  been incorporated  into Corps regulations and1  technical
guidance.

    In making water control decisions,the Corps must take a vs-ci&tiy osBS>  arad
the potential frequently exists  to  regulate  the project(s)  for
additional benefits.  This  flexibility depends on the compati&Mtty off
each water use, the characteristics of the project or river sg
water use requirements  and  other factors.
    Water levels  in  impoundments may be regulated  to providte
storage space to  control floods, as well as to store water fear, a
range of uses.  Releases may be regulated to achieve requitaientes ffinr
public use, recreation, and to support  fish and wildlife needb
downstream.  System  regulation for water quality is  most
                                     F-3

-------
during low flow periods when available water must be used efficiently
to avoid degrading lake or river quality.  However, even this worthy
objective often conflicts with other water needs such as water supply
or hydropower storage.

    The melding of all of the above considerations usually requires
some degree of compromise to achieve water management goals.  For each
project or system, the use requirements are evaluated to assure the
greatest project benefits.  This balancing of water use demands,
priorities  and project capabilities is the overall goal of the Corps
water control management program.

    Finally, water quality management activities must compete with a
large number of other efforts for limited manpower and funding
resources.  Given a particular level of resources, agencies prioritize
their programs, and carry them out at a level of effort consistent with
each program priority.  The heightened public concern for the
environment, and the resulting legislative and executive mandates, have
raised the visibility and priority of water quality management programs
in the Corps of Engineers which resulted in the accomplishments
previously described.
WATER QUALITY STATUS OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECTS
    a.  Introduction

    The Corps of Engineers has constructed and now operates more than
700 water resource projects having a total surface area of nearly
27,000 square kilometers.  The geographic distribution of these
projects, as depicted in Figure 1, reflects regional differences in
water resource development requirements, water control agency
responsibilities, and topographic requirements for cost-effective
construction.  Impoundments providing navigation benefits, which
comprise approximately 26 percent of all Corps projects, are located
along major inland waterways.  These include the Mississippi River and
its major tributaries, the Arkansas and Red Rivers draining from the
                                     F-4

-------
west, and the Ohio and Illinois Rivers draining from the east.  Other
waterways of importance include the Alabama River and the
Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway in the mid-south, and the Columbia River
in the northwest.  Twenty one percent of all projects are dry dams or
projects which, by design, provide minimal permanent water storage
during non-flood periods.  These projects are most prevalent in the
arid southwest, where flooding conditions are associated with
intermittent periods of excessive runoff, and in the New England
states.

    Reservoir projects providing short- and long-term storage of water,
but not navigation benefits, comprise the remaining 53 percent of all
Corps projects.  These projects can be broadly categorized based on
reservoir morphometry and tributary type.  Deep, storage reservoirs are
formed by the impoundment of higher order streams and rivers, and are
frequently located in deep, steeply-sloped river valleys.  These
projects tend to be deep, narrow and highly dendritic in shape.
Mainstem reservoirs are located on lower order (ie. larger) rivers and
tend to be shallower, wider, and less complex in shape.
    b.  Methods

    Growing public concern over the quality of freshwater resources and
the desire to continue to provide responsible management of the
valuable environmental resource provided by its water resource projects
led the Corps of Engineers to institute several water resource research
programs.  The purposes of these research programs were to expand the
understanding of processes influencing the environmental quality of
reservoirs and tailwaters, and to improve management technologies.  As
a continuing effort, the Corps has established a number of technology
transfer programs as a means of distributing water quality information
and technology.

    Currently, the Corps is compiling and analyzing water quality
information as a means of providing an up-to-date assessment of the
water quality status of all its water resource projects.  Sources of
                                       F-5

-------
information include annual water quality reports prepared by District
and Division offices, water quality data retrieved from EPA's STORET
database system, and detailed evaluations by project management
personnel.

     For the purposes of this report, portions of the above mentioned
information have been reviewed and analyzed.  Specifically, this
information was obtained through the use of a comprehensive
questionnaire designed to solicit detailed information concerning all
aspects of project design, operation, and water quality status.  The
questionnaires were completed by personnel familiar with each pioject
and its water quality characteristics.  With regard to water quality
status, subjective responses to questions concerning water quality were
requested.  In general, these responses indicated the presence or
absence of water quality problems.  In situations where problems were
indicated, graded responses allowed assessment of the severity of the
problem and the quality of the information upon which the assessment
was based.  To date, questionnaires for approximately 470 projects have
been completed and compiled.

     Since questionnaires for all projects have not yet been completed,
a sample of questionnaires was randomly drawn and analyzed for the
purpose of this report.  The sample size was set at 10 percent (46
projects) and samples were drawn from strata based on project type
(reservoir, lock and dam, and dry dam) and District.  The geographic
locations of sampled projects are presented in Figure 2 for comparison
with the distribution of all projects  (Figure 1).  Results presented
below are based on these analyses.
     c.  Assessment

     Figures  3 and 4 present the water quality status of tailwaters and
pools associated with the sampled projects, respectively.  A
shortcoming of the data upon which these figures are based is the fact
that reliable information concerning water quality status is lacking
for approximately 40 to 50 percent of the projects.  A number of
                                        F-6

-------
reasons for this lack of information are possible.  The collection,
analysis, and reporting of water quality information at many projects
is performed by agencies other than the Corps.  This is particularly
true for projects at which recreation and other water-based resources
are managed and maintained by local authorities.  Thus, while water
quality data may be collected, such data may not be readily available
to Corps personnel.

     Funding and manpower constraints have a significant impact on the
quality and quantity of water quality information collected at many
Corps projects.  To overcome these constraints, priorities are often
established which provide for the collection of appropriate water
quality data for those projects at which water quality concerns are
deemed to be of highest priority.  Other projects, because of
historical data or informal knowledge concerning their water quality
status, are sampled IPSS intensively or less frequently.  Thus, a
degree of uncertainty and/or bias exists for data discussed here and
extrapolations of data compiled for the sampled projects to all
projects are not possible.  The data do, however, provide a general
assessment of the types of water quality concerns associated with Corps
water resource projects and some indication of their relation to other
project attributes.

     As depicted in Figure 3, approximately 60 to 65 percent of those
sampled projects for which evaluations of the water quality status of
tailwaters were available were considered not to exhibit problematic
conditions.  For those projects indicated as exhibiting problematic
conditions, several categories of water quality concerns are apparent.
Most prevalent are concerns related to flow, the release of waters low
in dissolved oxygen concentration, and the erosion and transport of
sediment.

     Extremes in flow and/or excessive changes in flow, which result
from operational procedures required to meet authorized project
purposes (e.g., flood control, power generation, etc.), may impact
downstream uses.  While such conflicts in uses are frequently
problematic, every attempt is made to enhance non-authorized benefits
without incurring unacceptable impacts on authorized purposes.

                                       F-7

-------
Flow-related problems for tailwaters include higher than normal flows
following flood events as retained flood waters are released, lower
than normal flows during periods then pool storage is being increased,
and daily fluctuations resulting from the operation of hydropower
facilities, particularly when power is produced to meet peak-load
requirements.

     The loss of dissolved oxygen in the hypolimnia of reservoirs
potentially results in direct and indirect impacts for tailwaters.  For
projects which, because of their structural or operational
characteristics, do not allow for complete reaeration of release
waters, dissolved oxygen concentrations below saturation may occur
throughout part or all of the summer stratified season.  Such is the
case for approximately one-third of the projects inventoried here.
However, it should be noted only one of the 46 sampled projects
experiences periodically severe dissolved oxygen conditions in it's
tailwater and that this project is a newly-filled reservoir where such
occurrences are predictable and short-lived.

     Coincident with the loss of dissolved oxygen from reservoir
hypolimnia is the potential for the release of dissolved materials,
particularly iron and manganese, from bottom sediments.  The
accumulation of these materials in reservoir waters, in turn, leads to
their potential release to downstream areas.  The occurrence of
elevated concentrations of metals and nutrients in tailwaters is
indicated for approximately 30 to 40 percent of the sampled projects
for which such evaluations were made.  And, as would be expected, these
projects are primarily those for which reduced dissolved oxygen
concentrations were reported.  It is also important to note that these
projects are also reported to receive relatively high inputs of these
materials from their surrounding watershed.

     The transport of suspended sediment from reservoir to tailwater
                    *
and/or the erosion and resuspension of bank and bed materials impacts
tailwater areas below approximately 40 to 50 percent of the projects
for which evaluations were provided.  In most cases, impacts are minor
and result from increased turbidity.  In other cases, degradation of
immediate downstream areas is indicated.  Preliminary evaluation of
                                        F-8

-------
information suggests that, while project operation plays a significant
role in the determination of release conditions, pronounced regional
patterns in the distribution of such conditions are apparent.  In
general, reservoirs located in regions dominated by highly-erodible
soils experience higher inputs of suspended sediment and, therefore,
often release turbid waters.

     An evaluation of water quality conditions in pools, also based on
sampled responses to the questionnaire, are presented in Figure 4.
Most prevalent were problems related to the eutrophication process.
These include excessive nutrient concentrations, algal blooms, reduced
water clarity, macrophyte infestations, and the loss of dissolved
oxygen in bottom waters.  Other conditions of concern include excessive
concentrations of reduced iron and manganese in bottom waters, and the
accumulation of sediment and contaminants.  As was discussed for
tailwaters, problematic conditions were indentified for approximately
40 to 50 percent of the pools for which evaluations were available.
And, again, varying degrees of severity in problematic conditions are
apparent.

     Complex interactions between biotic and abiotic components of the
reservoir ecosystem make simple, meaningful evaluations of data
difficult; however, several general patterns emerge from existing
information.  Most notable is the impact of watershed processes and the
transport of material from watershed to reservoir.  The loss of
nutrients and sediment from watersheds and their accumulation in
reservoirs fosters the growth of aquatic plants, primarily algae, and
losses in storage volume.  These effects, in turn, lead to reduced
water clarity, reduced dissolved oxygen concentrations in bottom
waters, and the potential for internal material cycling between
nutrient-rich sediments and the overlying water column.

     An understanding of the linkage between watershed and reservoir is
critical to our understanding of water quality processes and the
control of water quality problems.  This is of particular concern to
agencies such as the Corps of Engineers since primary control of water
quality conditions must target processes occurring in that portion of
the reservoir-watershed ecosystem in which the water control agency has
                                       F-9

-------
little or no regulatory authority.   As an indication of the potential
importance of watershed processes,  it should be noted that watershed-area
to lake-area ratios are higher for reservoirs than for natural lakes.
Obviously, as this ratio increases,  so does the potential  for increased or
excessive material loads to the reservoir.

      A review of landuse patterns in the watersheds of the sampled
reservoir projects indicates that,  on the average, natural, agricultural,
and urban/residential areas account for 45, 45, and 10 percent of the
landuses in the reservoir watersheds, respectively.  Since agricultural and
urban/residential areas often contribute excessive nutrient and sediment
loads to streams and rivers, the control of point and nonpoint sources are
clearly indicated as the primary means by which reservoir water quality can
be protected or improved through reduced loading.  This is underscored by
the observation that sampled projects for which eutrophication-related
problems were indicated also receive nutrient loads deemed by reservoir
water quality personnel to be excessive and problematic.
FUTURE DIRECTION

      The following are areas where additional emphasis would benefit both
Congress and the federal water resource agencies in understanding and
managing water quality at federal reservoir projects.

      a.  Extensive research has been conducted to develop improved
techniques for analyzing river and reservoir water quality dynamics,
reservoir and reservoir system operations and associated
interrelationships.  However, many unknowns and problems remain.  Agency
water quality related research programs will be prioritized to address
urgent needs.
                                     F-10

-------
      b.  Applications of technologies to ameliorate water quality
conditions at reservoirs have been undertaken by the Corps of Engineers.
Varying degrees of success have been achieved, and it has become evident
that additional direct field application and evaluation of water quality
enhancement techniques is needed to fill the void between research and
successful use in the field.  The Corps intends to continue to conduct
demonstration programs to improve design guidance and define limitations,
capabilities and ancillary effects.  Interagency cooperation in this
program would extend the limits of applicability and facilitate sharing of
agency expertise.  This effort, in concert with the previously outlined
initiatives, would greatly enhance the federal agencies' abilities to carry
out Congressionally mandated responsibilities pertaining to reservoir water
quality management and the achievement of national water quality goals.
                                     F-ll

-------
Figure 1.  Geographic distribution of Corps of Engineers water resource
           projects.
Figure 2.  Geographic distribution of a ten percent, stratified, random
           sample of Corps of Engineers projects for vchich questionnaires
           have been received.
                                       F-12

-------
   Bacteria
   Dissolved Solids
   Fluctuating Flow
   Fluctuating Temp
   High Flow
   High Nutrients
   High Temperature
   Hydrogen Sulfide
   Iron
   Low DO
   Low Flow
   Low Temperature
   Mocrophytes
   Manganese
   Metals
   Organics
   Parasites
   Sediment
   Shore Erosion
   Supersaturation
   Taste and Odor
   Turbidity
   pH/Acidity
                                            50

                                           Percent
75
100
Figure  3.   Frequency of occurrence of  occasionally  problematic  (coarse
hatching), intermittently  problematic  (fine hatching),  chronically
problematic (cross hatching),  and non-problematic (no hatching)  water
quality conditions in tailvaters.  Difference between accumulative
frequency and  100 percent  indicates percentage of projects  for  which no
evaluation was made.
   Algoe
   Bocterio
   Dissolved Solids
   Drowdown
   High Nutrients
   Hydrogen Sulfide
   Iron
   Low DO
   Mocrophytes
   Manganese
   Metals
   Orgonics
   Parasites
   Pool Fluctuation
   Sediment
   Shore Erosion
   Taste and Odor
   Turbidity
   pH/Acidity
                                                                        100
Figure 4.  Frequency of  occurrence of occasionally problematic (coarse
hatching), intermittently problematic (fine  hatching),  chronically
problematic  (cross hatching), and  non-problematic (no hatching) pool water
quality conditions.  Difference  between accumulative frequency and  100
percent indicates percentage of  projects for which no evaluation was made.
                                         F-13

-------
                            APPENDIX G
            TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY'S ASSESSMENT
                           SUPPLEMENT


                                INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides an assessment of water quality conditions in the
Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) system of multipurpose water resource
projects (Figure 1).  It responds to the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) request for information for its report entitled "Dam Water Quality
Study--A Report to Congress under Section 52A, Clean Water Act of 1987."
It is organized in three main sections:  Assessment of Water Quality;
Policies - Water Quality Management; and Recommendations.

                         ASSESSMENT OF  WATER QUALITY

Water quality conditions for reservoirs in the Tennessee Valley were
assessed using the approach applied by the Corps of Engineers to assess
its 783 projects.  First, a questionnaire was completed for each reservoir
by an individual knowledgeable about water quality in the reservoir.  Then
information was obtained from personnel familiar with the primary reservoir
uses and reservoir operations.  Finally, in several group settings, the
questionnaire responses were reviewed for uniformity in defining the
parameters and rating each project.  Thirty-three projects were assessed,
including all the hydropower projects and four nonhydroprojects.  Those
projects not included are small projects for which no data were available.

The results are presented in Figures 2 and 3 for pools and tailwaters,
respectively.  Definitions are as follows:  "continuous:"  a chronic or
continuous problem; "seasonal:"  an intermittent problem occurring on a
seasonal basis; "infrequent:" an occassional problem ocurring infrequently
on an annual basis; "no problem" and "no data:" self-defined; "severe:" a
severe impact resulting in the long-term loss of one or more user benefits;
"significant:" a significant impact that restricts but does not eliminate
user benefits; "minor:" a minor impact which does not restrict user
benefits.

Water uses were severely impacted at several sites.  Low DO, hydrogen
sulfide, iron, and manganese are considered to be at sufficient levels that
the fishery at Upper Bear Creek. Reservoir is practically nonexistent.
Other reservoir projects having severe use impairment are the three Ocoee
projects where sediment accumulation, iron, manganese, turbidity, and metal
contaminants are adversely impacting aquatic life and recreation, primarily
in Ocoee number 3 with less impairment in Numbers 2 and 1.  Finally, the
Nolichucky Reservoir has been filled with sediment to the point that it is
no longer considered a reservoir.

The results indicate that in reservoir pools the most significant impacts
were pool level fluctuations and bacteria (about 50 and 30 percent of the
reservoirs, respectively).  The next most significant user impacts were
turbidity, algae, macrophytes, sediment accumulation, and shore erosion,
all of which occur at 15-20 percent of the reservoir projects.  Minor
impacts, occurring at 20 percent or more of the reservoir projects, were
                                G-l

-------
related to the following parameters; iron, manganese, low DO, turbidity,
low temperature, high nutrients and algae, macrophytes, sediment
accumulation, pool level fluctuation, shore erosion, pH/acidity, bacteria,
and fish parasites.

Several items worth noting for the analysis on pools are:  (1) data on
hydrogen sulfide were limited and the results of this analysis may change
when more data becomes available; (2) several parameters had high rates
of recurrence with the potential to impact uses in the future: i.e., high
nutrients, sediment accumulation, shore erosion; (3) low DO seasonally
occurred in about 70 percent of the reservoirs, but user impacts were
considered minor becasue the condition was restricted to the hypolimnion
or bottom waters of the reservoir, in which case "no data" was designated;
and (4) more data are needed on organics and metals in fish flesh.

For reservoir tailwaters, the results indicate that the most significant
impacts resulted from low DO, streamflow (high, low, and fluctuating), and
low temperature.  The next most frequent user impacts were associated with
iron, manganese, hydrogen sulfide, turbidity, metal contaminants,
streambank. erosion, bacteria, and fish parasites.  All of these parameters
occurred at about 15-20 percent of the projects.  The most frequent minor
impacts, occurring at 20 percent or more of the projects, were related to
the following parameters:  low DO, turbidity, high flow, fluctuating flow,
low temperature, high temperature, fluctuating temperature, streambank
erosion, and parasites in fish.

Several items worth noting on the tailwater assessment are:  (1) even
though data were not available on the user impacts of gas supersatura-
tion, the impacts are probably minor; and (2) more data are needed on
hydrogen sulfide, bacteria, and fish flesh contaminants.

                     Reservoir Water Quality Management

TVA's programs on reservoir water quality management are focused on three
areas:  tailwater management, reservoir management, and watershed
management.  The long-range strategy is to achieve proper management of all
TVA reservoirs and tailwaters; however, at present the activities have been
directed toward reservoirs and tailwaters that have the greatest user
impacts.

TVA actively pursues reservoir water quality management through the
formation of "partnerships".  To the extent practical, joint projects are
conducted with State agencies, EPA, and with public interest groups.  These
partnerships are invaluable in ensuring that appropriate analyses are
conducted so that results are implemented in a timely manner.  The
partnerships also reduce TVA costs for conducting studies and implementing
solutions to priority problems.

Tailwater Management Strategy—TVA's tailwater management strategy
concentrates on improving the habitat for fish and aquatic life,
recreational floating, assimilative capacity for treated wastewaters, and
providing for municipal and industrial water supply.  The typical water
quality parameters include DO, streamflow, temperature, iron, manganese,
hydrogen sulfide, pathogens, sediment, and total dissolved gases.


                                 G-2

-------
At the present time TVA is concentrating its efforts on improving DO
concentrations and enhancing stream flows.  Elements of this effort
include:

1.   Assessment of existing water quality, biological conditions, and
     potential uses of the tailwater, followed by a plan that identifies
     needed improvements and a monitoring strategy to assess its
     effectiveness.

2.   Aeration and/or oxygenation of the hydropower releases to about
     4mg/L during those portions of the year when DO fails to meet this
     value.

3.   Provision of minimum or increased flows downstream from
     hydroelectric power plants, tailored to meet specific needs as
     determined through field studies and data analyses.

4.   Investigation of impacts from iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide
     and evaluation of methods to reduce these substances within the
     reservoir as well as the tailwater.

The chapter on case studies provides more information on the activities
at the Norris and Upper Bear Creek, projects.

Reservoir Management Strategy—TVA's reservoir management strategy is
directed toward achieving objectives for fish and aquatic life, recrea-
tion (primarily boating and swimming), assimilative capacity for treated
wastewaters, and municipal and industrial water supplies.  The water
quality parameters that are addressed include DO, temperature, iron,
manganese, hydrogen sulfide, pathogens, sediment, turbidity, nutrients,
algal concentrations, toxic substances, and aquatic weed growths.

TVA develops water quality management plans for selected reservoirs where
water uses are suspected of being affected and significant interest is
expressed by state agencies, EPA, and the public and private sectors.
Compared with free-flowing streams, reservoirs are very complex water
bodies that are affected not only by the retention of the water behind
the dam, but by operational procedures for the dam and environmental
processes that occur within the water body itself.

Because a number of agencies and water users have various authorities and
responsibilities associated with reservoirs, joint efforts are pursued to
achieve objectives and maximize the benefits of the reservoirs.  The
following are the elements that are included in TVA's reservoir water
quality management plans:

1.   An issues analysis is performed to define reservoir uses and
     objectives, and key issues.

2.   A task force is organized for the reservoir that includes State and
     Federal agencies, universities, lake users, municipalities, and
     industry, as appropriate.

3.   Data is collected and analyzed to address key issues and explore
     management alternatives.


                                 G-3

-------
4.   A plan is developed with recommended actions, including additional
     data/analysis needs, point and nonpoint source actions, in-reservoir
     enhancement methods, water quality improvement demonstrations, and
     citizen involvement.

5.   Activities committed to by TVA are implemented.

6.   Follow-through actions are reevaluated to determine their
     effectiveness in achieving objectives.

Reservoir management plans have been developed and are being implemented
at 5 projects.  Special reservoir studies are also being conducted for
other reservoir projects where issues with limited scope need to be
addressed.  More information is provided in the chapter on case studies
for the Boone and Guntersville projects.

Watershed Management Strategy—TVA's watershed management strategy is
primarily directed toward the reduction of nonpoint sources of pollution
from agriculture, abandoned mines, urban runoff, and land development
activities.  The objective is to improve water quality conditions in
streams as well as reservoirs and tailwateis.  Parameters of interest
include nutrients, toxic substances, sediment, pathogens, ammonia, and
carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand.  IVA's efforts in watersheds are
directed towards demonstrating nonpoint source management solutions and
encouraging full-scale implementation actions by other agencies and
private landowners.  Even though reservoirs are the ultimate recipients
of nonpoint source contamination from the watershed, cause/effect
relationships between contaminants from watersheds and water quality in
reservoirs are poorly defined.

The elements of TVA's watershed management strategy are as follows:

1.   Pertinent information is gathered from all available sources and
     issues that need to be addressed are identified.

2.   An aerial inventory of nonpoint sources is made.

3.   A "delivery analysis" is conducted in which parameters from
     contaminant sources to point of reservoir inflow are noted.

4.   Water quality and aquatic life (e.g., index of biotic integrity) are
     monitored at selected points to better define issues and assess
     trends.

5.   Nonpoint source control demonstrations are conducted and successful
     technology is transferred to appropriale agencies and individuals.

6.   Institutional arrangements are developed for full-scale
     implementation of priority point and nonpoint source controls.
                                 G-4

-------
                    POLICIES - WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The TVA system of multipurpose dams with its more than 11,000 miles of
shoreline and 600,000 acres of water was largely completed by the late
1950s.  With the completion of the dam construction program, TVA has
turned its attention to managing the reservoir system and promoting the
proper growth, conservation, and management of the Agency's natural
resources.  As part of this continuing effort, the TVA Board of Directors
authorized in September 1987 the broadest reassessment in 50 years of the
operating policies of its dams and reservoirs.  The central issues being
addressed by the study are whether water quality and recreation should be
added as primary purposes of TVA reservoir operations to the statutory
purposes of navigation, flood control and electrical generation.  The
study is being conducted in accordance with the procedures of the
National Environmental Policy Act and will determine the long-term
policies that should direct TVA efforts in reservoir system operations
and river management into the next century.  The current schedule calls
for presentation of the final report and Environmental Impact Statement
and the results of public review and comment of the recommendations in
1989.

              Water Quality Policies.  Codes,  and  Instructions

TVA has adopted the following operational policies or codes related to
water quality. The most comprehensive policy is contained in TVA Code IX
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.  This code states that:

     TVA will ensure that its programs, projects, and activities protect
     and enhance the quality of the human environment, including the air,
     water, and land resources of the TVA region and other areas impacted
     by its operations through compliance with applicable Federal, State,
     and local laws and related regulations and through the
     implementation of more rigorous controls or practices where
     practical, beneficial, and cost effective.

     TVA's planning procedures provide for early involvement of approp-
     riate governmental agencies and the public in decisionmaking
     related to activities which significantly affect the quality of the
     environment.  In addition, TVA prepares reports on the status of
     environmental quality in the Tennessee Valley.

The code further states that:

     implementation of this policy is a basic management responsibility
     and TVA expects all line managers to provide positive environmental
     leadership in carrying out agency operations and activities.  TVA
     conducts monitoring and auditing activities to measure and evaluate
     the extent to which environmental quality standards and commitments
     are met.
                                G-5

-------
TVA's specific policy on water quality is contained in TVA Code IX  WATER
QUALITY MANAGEMENT.  This code states that:

     TVA's water quality management activities have as their primary
     purpose the restoration or maintenance  of suitable water quality
     throughout the Valley to permit optimum use of surface and ground
     waters for municipal, industrial, and agricultural water supplies;
     for propagation of fish and wildlife; for aesthetic enjoyment; for
     water-contact recreation; and for future development of streams and
     reservoirs in the public interest.   The goal is to keep all waters
     clean and free of pollutants	It applies existing or, where none
     exist, develops water quality criteria  for use in its water resource
     development projects; where there is no practical alternative to
     disposal of hydrowastes into streams, it encourages the imposition
     of regulatory controls designed to obtain the highest degree of
     waste treatment available under existing technology, within
     reasonable economic limits, to protect  the Valley's surface and
     groundwater resources.

TVA's policy also recognizes that:

     its statutory program of impoundment and streamflow regulation
     produces significant changes in streamflow and in the physical,
     chemical, and biological characteristics of affected waters in the
     Valley.  Overall, these alterations are highly beneficial, but some
     changes have adverse water quality effects and may reduce the
     capacity of the streams to assimilate wastes.  TVA conducts studies
     and field investigations to identify and evaluate the interrelation-
     ship of water resource development and  water quality, utilizing
     research findings of other agencies and institutions to the maximum
     extent feasible.  Consistent with the primary purposes for which TVA
     projects are operated under the TVA Act, TVA operates its system of
     reservoirs to minimize adverse water quality effects and to give due
     account to State-designated downstream uses.  TVA controls or treats
     wastes from its own operations in accordance with the stated primary
     purpose of this policy, cooperating with Federal and State pollution
     control agencies.  In the administration and disposal of TVA lands
     and in the licensing or regulation of water-use facilities con-
     structed on TVA reservoirs, TVA incorporates pollution control
     provisions, including requirements for  using best management
     practices to control nonpoint-source pollutants, in deeds, leases,
     licenses, permits, and other documents  as appropriate.

In addition to these policies, water quality considerations are also
included in TVA Code IX  FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF
WETLANDS, TVA Code IX  STREAM MODIFICATION,  and TVA Code XII  RESERVOIR
OPERATION.  Of particular interest to this study is the policy which
specifies how TVA regulates reservoir levels and streamflow (where
consistent with statutory purposes) to:

o    Minimize detrimental water pollution effects and produce water
     quality benefits for the public health  and public use of the
     reservoirs, such regulation to be provided without accepting
     liability for the regulation and without relieving the polluter from
     full responsibility for such pollution.


                                fi-6

-------
     Make the greatest possible contribution to the sustained control of
     hazards to health in the Tennessee Valley region and to maintain
     standards for control of mosquitos which are fully as effective as
     those required for privately owned river impoundments under
     prevailing public health regulations.

     Enhance fisheries management and other recreation uses of these
     waters.  Under these conditions, it attempts to provide pool levels
     favorable for recreational uses and to minimize fluctuations during
     the prime recreation season and spawning season on tributary
     reservoirs.  Also, wherever primary operating requirements permit,
     it attempts to regulate sufficient discharges from dams to provide
     for boating and fishing activities on certain streams.

     Minimize possible adverse effects on propagation of fish life and
     enhance the value of Valley fisheries.

     Provide a water supply for domestic, industrial, or agricultural
     uses.

     Accommodate individual navigators, ferry operators, farmers on river
     islands and shore lands, and others who may otherwise suffer
     discomforts of inconveniences or may need special flow regimes to
     accommodate short-term scientific research or management
     demonstrations.  Such regulation does not entail acceptance of
     responsibility for serving such incidental comforts or conveniences
     or infringe on TVA's acquired right to flood the reservoir margins
     whenever or wherever required for the major purposes of this program
     without regard to any secondary land use which may have been
     undertaken subject to such flowage rights.
                              RECOMMENDATIONS

As TVA reported to the U.S. Senate's Subcommittee on Environmental
Pollution in 1985, 7 of the 10 most critical water quality problems in
the Tennessee Valley are related to nonpoint pollution.  TVA said then
and still believes nonpoint pollutants are not being adequately
addressed, and the Clean Water Act goals of "fishable, swimmable" waters
will not be met in many parts of the Valley unless additional point and
nonpoint pollution control measures are implemented.  Damage is not only
occurring to natural resources but public health, economic development
efforts, water supplies, and the Nation's $1.53 billion investment in the
TVA reservoir system are affected.

Both in the region and nationally, there is increasing public recognition
of the interrelationships between land-based activities, surface water
pollution, and groundwater contamination.  Many of the most intractable
environmental challenges currently facing the nation involve impacts that
involve two or more of these areas.  The major constraints to addressing
these problems are limited resources and the difficulties inherent in
dealing with multimedia impacts through existing medium-specific
programs.  Recent legislation offers some encouragement.  The
conservation title of the Food Security Act of 1985 established major
national programs (Conservation Reserve, sodbuster, swampbuster) that
                                 G-7

-------
concurrently address questions about agricultural overproduction, soil
erosion, and wetlands destruction.   The Water Quality Act of 1987
provides States with new and more broadly based incentives to define and
address the nonpoint pollution issues that chronically impede attainment
of the goals of the Clean Water Act.  Substantial funding is authorized
for both these initiatives.   Neither can be expected to yield instan-
taneous cures for the longstanding  national and regional issues that they
address.  Both, however, offer hope for major improvements over the long
term if resources are allocated to  implement these programs.

EPA maintains it has sufficient authority and responsibility to oversee
the preparation and implementation  of measures to improve water quality
nationally.  TVA supports EPA and the States' efforts to use their
authority and to make available the resources necessary to address water
quality problems.  Our experience with water quality in TVA's reservoir
system indicates that no major improvement will occur until point and
nonpoint source controls are considered and implemented as part of the
overall water quality improvement strategy.  To do this in the most cost
effective way, innovative approaches may be necessary, such as allowing
States to use more of their  allocation of the existing $2.4 billion
construction grants or revolving loan program to fund cost-offective
nonpoint pollution control projects.  In recent studies with EPA and the
State of Tennessee, TVA has  found that innovative solutions can be more
cost-effective than building traditional advanced wastewater treatment
plants.  If the Tennessee Valley and the Nation are to achieve Clean
Water Act goals, the States  should  be provided with the flexibility to
make tradeoffs in point versus nonpoint abatement, once secondary
treatment requirements are met, and in targeting clean water funding to
where it is most cost-effective.

As questions arise with regards to  eutrophication, toxics, and sediment
buildup in streams and reservoirs,  it becomes more apparent that water
resource interests need to take a more active role in the triennial
review of State water quality standards.  Areas of particular interest
include:

1.   Stream Use Classification—TVA believes that lake and reservoir
     water quality can be managed better if a distinction is made between
     free-flowing streams, lakes, impoundments, and tailwaters.  TVA has
     offered to work with the States and EPA in developing criteria and
     standards for impounded waters and tailwaters that recognize
     the hydrologic and related physical, chemical, and biological
     differences between these water bodies.

2.   Impaired Waters Designation(s)—Additional measures are needed to
     control pollutants that are causing cultural eutrophication, toxics
     impacts, and sediment buildup in streams and reservoirs.  Water
     bodies with particular  use impairments should be identified
     categorically as impaired waters, e.g., "Nutrient Sensitive Waters",
     "Erosion Sensitive Watershed."  Following this designation, water-
     shed or areawide pollutant control programs should be developed that
     emphasize the control or treatment of point and nonpoint source
     contributions.
                                  G-8

-------
Taken together these policy issues strongly suggest the need to reexamine
resource management and pollution control strategies.  Better integration
of these programs has not only become an important policy issue in the
Tennessee Valley, but nationally as originally recognized by the Water
Resource Council (WRC) in its "Second National Water Assessment,"
10 years ago.

                  Water Quality Research Recommendations

Additional activities beyond those now carried out by the Federal
government are needed to adequately address water quality concerns.  The
following are critical research needs that have been identified by TVA's
environmental engineers and scientists.

Water Quality Criteria—Existing criteria and standards are essentially
based on "fixed" concentrations for a single constituent.  For example,
EPA's dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria document has progressed from
recommended minimum concentrations for selected levels of protection to
the point where they consider the type of resource to be protected, i.e.,
whether it is a warm or cold water fishery, life stage of the fishery
resource  and substratum or habitat condition.  This is a significant
improvement, but the criterion remains a single stream value and thus
fails to fully address the needs of resource managers.  In highly
regulated rivers like those managed by Federal water resource agencies,
water quality criteria and standards are needed that take into consider-
ation (1) the interaction between multiple constituents, (2) the rate of
change that could result in unacceptable environmental conditions, and
(3) the frequency and duration of exposure of target organisms.

Total Dissolved Gases (TDG)—TDG is another issue deserving attention
because they have been observed at relatively high concentrations during
flood control operations at dams on the Tennessee River and elsewhere.
However, the effects on downstream fisheries have not been adequately
assessed to determine if these elevated concentrations are significant.

Hydrogen Sulfide—Hydrogen sulfide is being detected in the releases from
water resource projects.  This constituent is extremely toxic at very low
concentrations (i.e., 2 ug/1).  Limited information is available on the
occurrence of hydrogen sulfide in reservoir releases because present
analytical methods are not sufficient to detect toxic levels.  Infor-
mation about the rate of oxidation of hydrogen sulfide is also limited,
but it can vary considerably because of naturally occurring catalysts
that result in rapid oxidation; however, in the absence of such
catalysts, hydrogen sulfide can persist downstream for several miles
before it is oxidized to a nontoxic state.  Hence, additional field data
are needed on the occurrence and persistence of hydrogen sulfide.

Temperature—The releases from some reservoir projects can contain water
that is too cold for desirable fish growth in the downstream tailwater,
and in some cases spawning activities can be significantly affected by
temperatures in the reservoir releases.  Work at the Bureau of
Reclamation's Flaming Gorge project has demonstrated one method for
improving temperatures.   However, less expensive means may be available.
                                  G-9

-------
For example, surface water pumps may be feasible to mix the upper layers
that have warmer temperatures with the colder layers in such a way that
these two water sources are blended before being released through
low-level outlets.

Minimum Flows—There are two key issues related to the provision of
minimum streamflows below hydropower projects:  (1) the quantity of flow
required to achieve fishery and aquatic life objectives and (2) the means
of providing such minimum flows, i.e., the use of "continuous" flows
versus the use of "pulsing" flows that are more desirable from a
hydropower viewpoint.  Concerning the first issue, there is a need to
better predict the effects of various streamflow levels on aquatic life.
There are several available methods for predicting the effects of flow
quantity on aquatic life, but their accuracy is suspect.  In addition,
because recreationists are the most immediate beneficiaries of tailwater
improvements, better methods are needed to determine from their viewpoint
which flows are desirable.

                    Reservoir Research Recommendations

Reservoir Models—Even though significant progress has been made in
developing methods for analyzing reservoir water quality, new
mathematical modelling methods in two dimensions have been applied to
only a few reservoirs.  Additional application of such models is
critically needed to more fully understand the water quality changes that
occur within a reservoir.  Stream models have been in existence since the
1920s, and estuary models have been available since about 1970, whereas
2-D reservoir water quality models have only become available during the
1980s.  These models have significantly improved the ability to assess
and predict such things as DO and the mechanisms that consume oxygen
within the reservoir; however, even with recent developments with the 2-D
model, the effects of inflow water quality on reservoirs has still not
been clearly defined.  There is a need to identify the reservoir water
quality effects of various sources of contamination within watersheds,
particularly nutrients from point and nonpoint sources.  The direct
linkages between these sources of contaminants and effects on overall
water quality in receiving impoundments have not yet been defined
quantiatively .  Sound assessments of the mechanisms that affect water
quality within reservoirs are also needed to determine the effects of
changes resulting from reservoir operations.  For example, in the TVA
system, consideration is being given to maintaining summer pool levels
through the end of October each year, and sufficient modeling has not
been conducted to predict any resultant changes in water quality.
Modeling is also needed to predict water quality in large embayments to
reservoirs.  From a biological standpoint, embayments are extremely
important, yet these bodies of water are not usually considered in
reservoir models.

Hypolimnion Water Quality—If any resultant flow through a project is
substantially reduced for a portion of the year, it is not possible at
this time to predict the effects on existing uses.  Water quality issues
such as low DO in the hypolimnion can result and, in turn, contribute to
the potential release of hydrogen sulfide as well as manganese from the
sediments.
                                6-10

-------
                  Technology Development Recommendations

Aerating Turbines—Considerable research and development activities have
been initiated on various methods to increase water quality in hydropower
releases.  Several of these methods have been evaluated over the past
five years on full-scale operations.  However, most of them are retrofit
technologies.  There is a national need to develop new designs for
turbine replacement wheels in the next decade.  The objective would be to
incorporate aeration capabilities in the turbine system in such a manner
that minimum impacts would occur to power generation as well as
operations.  A large number of existing turbines in the United States
will be replaced over the next two decades; therefore, this proposal
offers a significant opportunity to enhance the dissolved oxygen
concentrations in turbine releases nationally.

Habitat Modifications—Habitat modifications within tailwaters could be a
less costly alternative to present minimum flow strategies.  Such
modifications would be one-time expense items as opposed to annual
operational expense items.  This concept can also be extended to certain
areas within reservoirs.  It is believed that some water uses can be
significantly enhanced by improving localized areas of the reservoirs.
One example is the embayment enhancement option.  Another example is the
provision of refuges for fish that may require the higher dissolved
oxygen levels found in cool waters, e.g., a submerged reservoir can be
constructed within a reservoir to contain high-density cold water and
provide habitat for striped bass.

                  Operational Monitoring Recommendations

Reservoirs with long retention times and low nutrient levels can develop
low dissolved oxygen concentrations in the hypolimnion, triggering the
release of hydrogen sulfide, iron, and manganese.  In some cases, such
occurrences may be avoided by changes in outlet levels or release
patterns.  In other cases, they may be aggravated by changes in release
patterns that result from reservoir operations for other purposes, e.g.,
raising pool levels for longer durations during the recreation season can
cause some significant changes in reservoir release patterns.  Water
quality within reservoirs may be affected by changes in watersheds and
year-to-year variation in hydrology in the form of annual
rainfall/runoff.   All of these interactions are complex and changes in
the water quality of the reservoir cannot simply be attributed to one
factor.  Therefore, it is necessary to conduct appropriate monitoring and
to determine the cause-and-effect relationships for processes within
reservoirs.   Mathematical models calibrated to field data offer one of
the best tools for exploring reservoir operations and evaluating
management alternatives.  Reservoirs are much more complex than
free-flowing streams,  resulting in three-dimensional variations in water
quality as opposed to single-dimensional.
                                 G-ll

-------
G-12

-------
                Iron
           Manganese
            Low D.O.
             Sill f iCiP
           Turbidity
     Low Temperature
    High Temperature
    Dissolved Solids
  Metal Contaminant
Organic Contaminant
     High  Nutrients
               Algae
    Sediment Accum.
  Pool Elev. Fluct.
      Shore Erosioi
       Taste 5 Odor
         pH/Acidity
           Bacteria
          Parasites
Organics-Fish Flesh
  Metals-Fish Flesh

                                                          Continuous
                                                            Seasonal
                                                          Infrequent
                                                          No Problem
                                                             No Data
                                         40         60
                                            Percent
                                          80
100
                Iron
          Manganese
           Low  O.Q.
   Hydrogen Sulfide
          Turbidit
    Low Temperature
   High Temperature
   Dissolved Solids
  Metal Contaminant
Organic Contaminant
     High Nutrients
              Algae
        Macrophytes
    Sediment Accum.
  Pool Elev. Fluct.
      Shore Erosi
       Taste S  Odor
         pH/Acidity
           Bacteria
          Parasites
Organics-Fish Flesh
  Metals-Fish Flesh
                                                               Severe
                                                         Significant
                                                                Minor
                                                           No  Impact
                                                             No Data
\-\<-VSZ-V.-'SSSSSSSSSSSS^^^^
    Figure 2 •   Rate of  recurrence  (upper graph) and  user impact assessment for  TVA
    reservoir  pools for  the indicated  parameters.
                                             G-13

-------
                Iron
           Manganese
           Low  0.0.
   Hydrogen Sulfide
           Turbidity
           Low  Flow
           High  Flow
   Fluctuating  Flow
    Low Temperature
   High Temperature
  Fluctuating Temp.
   Dissolved Solids
  Metal Contaminant
Organic Contaminant
Gas Supersaturation
     High Nutrients
              Algae
        Macrophytes
      Shore Erosion
       Taste S Odor
         pH/Acidity
           Bacteria
          Parasites
Organics-Fish Flesh
  Metals-Fish Flesh
               Iron
          Manganese
           Low 0.0.
   Hydrogen Sulfide
          Turbidity
           Low Flow
          High Flow)
   Fluctuating Flow
    Low Temperature
   High Temperature
  Fluctuating Temp.
   Dissolved Solids
  Metal Contaminant
Organic Contaminant
Gas Supersaturation
     High Nutrients
              Algae
        Macrophytes
      Shore Erosion
       Taste 8 Odor
         pH/Acidity
           Bacteria
          Paras ites
Organics-Fish Flesh
  Metals-Fish Flesh
Continuous
  Seasonal
Infrequent
No Problem
   No  Data
                                            Percent
     Severe
Significant
      Minor
  No Impact
    No Data
B5QH
                                            Percent
  Figure 3 .   Rate of recurrence (upper  graph)  and user  impact assessment  for TVA
  reservoir  tailwaters for  the indicated  parameters.
                                             G-14

-------
                                  APPENDIX H
                   U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION"S  ASSESSMENT
                                 SUPPLEMENT
EPA solicited comments from the States and Federal agencies  for
this report to Congress.  Federal and non-Federal organizations with
responsibility and activity involving impoundments were included.  At the
January 5, 1988, meeting the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Bureau of
Reclamation (USBR), and Corps of Engineers (COE) were invited to provide
an agency assessment of water quality at their dams.  Dams from these
three agencies represent a wide range of geography, climate,  and
operational situations.

This chapter presents the results of these agency assessments.  Tt
utilizes an alternate approach to that used in the main body of this
report.  The three agencies felt there were important limitations in
trying to perform a national overall assessment of the status of water
quality at dams without detailed appreciation of regional effects.  These
limitations center on three main points:

   1.   The basic assumptions of what constitutes a dam-related water
        quality problem are over-simplified.  The prime example of this
        is the assumption that thermal stratification ir any reservoir
        with low level outlets automatically causes downstream problems
        of low dissolved oxygen, dissolved iron and managanese, and
        hydrogen sulfide.  This is only the case where stratification
        lasts long enough to exhaust the supply of dissolved oxygen (DO)
        in the hypolimnion, and it is a function of the initial DO
        levels, the biochemical oxygen demand in the hypolimnion, and the
        hydrodynamics of flow through the bottom of the reservoir to the
        outlets.  An examination of the USBR assessment presented below,
        for example,  will show that problems of low DO, dissolved iron
        and manganese, and hydrogen sulfide are relatively rare at Bureau
        dams, although summer thermal stratification is nearly universal
        and low level outlets are not uncommon.

   2.   The analytical tools used are too general and, in some cases,
        flawed.  The use of a Froude number calculated on the basis of a
        flow equal to the spillway capacity to estimate stratification
        potential is considered to have serious limitations.  The Oak
        Ridge study cited in the evaluation of low DO levels in power dam
        releases is specific to the southeastern United States, and it is
        definitely not representative of USBR and COE power dams in the
        western arid region.  An evaluation of downstream effects on the
        basis of a comparison of mean annual upstream and downstream data
        is not meaningful, in that it AS not the annual average, but the
        seasonal variation that is important in an aquatic environmental
        parameter like xlow or temperature.  The r-enrichment analysis
        uses statistical models that have been shown to be too general
        for specific field situations.

    3.   The data base  (STORET) used in the analyses is not sufficiently
        comprehensive  in its representation, has no control on the
                                      H-l

-------
        quality or comparability of data on a case by case basis, and is
        arguably biased toward problem cases.

Given these basic limitations, the agencies felt that conclusions reached
on the basis of this overall evaluation are likely to be unreliable and
unrepresentative .

As a result of these concerns, the three agencies were each asked to
prepare a short assessment of the status of water quality at their dams.
This gives an analysis of rather specific situations, with TVA dams
located in a mature, we 11 -developed and rather industrialized extended
river basin; the COE dams are concentrated in the industrialized areas of
the Southeast and tue Ohio River Basin, coastal areas, the Pacific
Northwest, and along main stem navigable rivers; and USBR dams are all in
the western states.

In making their assessment, it was felt that a better approach to this
subject is to, first of all, realize that dam-related water quality
problems are much more s ite- specif ic than general.  The case studies
included in this report as Chapter IV make this point abundantly clear,
while the agency assessments presented below further emphasize the
variety of conditions.
The three agencies agreed that in t^is situation, the best way to assess
the nature, extent, and severity of impact of dam-related water quality
problems is to survey «s many as possible 01 the existing impoundments
and ask those directly responsible for their daily operation what the
problems are and what impacts are being felt.  They feel this subjective
approach is more likely to yield an accurate assessment of actual
conditions than is an indirect approach that relies on over-simplified
assumptions, a "data-rich but information-poor"*- data base, and the
"illusion of technique"^ of generalized models.

To this end, the three agencies adopted a questionnaire originally
developed by Kennedy, Gunkel, and Gaugush ot trie U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES) at Vicksburg, Mississippi,
as a  uniform instrument for collecting dam-related water quality
information on their respective projects.  A copy of the questionnaire,
with  its instruction sheet, is attached at the end of this chapter
(Attachment A) .

Basically, the questionnaire presents field personnel with a
comprehensive  list or water quality attributes, and asks them to
subjectively rate each attribute in the tributary, pool, and tailwater  of
      1  Ward,  R.C.,  J.C. Loftis,  and  G.B. McBride.  1986.  The "data-rich
 but information-poor"  syndrome in water  quality monitoring.  Environmental
 Management,  V.10,  N.3,  pp.292-297.

      2  Behnke,  R.J. 1987.  The illusion  01  technique and  fisheries
 management.  Proceedings of  the 22nd Annual  Meeting of the Colorado-
 Wyoming Chapter of the American Fisheries Society,  March  11-12,  1987,
 Laramie, WY, pp.48-51.
                                       H-2

-------
each reservoir on the basis of the extent to which this attribute is a
problem, the level of impact of the attribute on user benefits,  and the
reliability of the data upon which the rating is being made.   A computer
program, also developed at WES, compiles the data from the questionnaires
into a SAS data file.  Statistical analyses can then be performed on the
various attributes and their ratings using the SAS software.   In the
short time allowed for this study, the three agencies limited their
efforts to frequency analyses of each attribute's extent and impact in
the pools and tailwaters of their reservoirs.  Given more time,  these
analyses could be extended to reservoir tributaries and to the reported
quality of available data.  Finally, available quantitative data from
agency files and STORET could also be added to the analyses,  if there
were a desire to go beyond an assessment of the situation to an
investigation of parameter interrelationships.

The agencies feel the present limited analysis does, however, give an
accurate picture of the known extent of given water quality conditions
across a broad range of geography, climate, and project operating
criteria, along with an assessment of the perceiveu impacts of these
conditions on user benefits.  All of this information is presented, not
from the perspective of a simplified general overview of the way
reservoirs should theoretically behave, but from the point of view of
field personnel who are directly responsible for daily dam operations and
the delivery of promised project benefits.

The remainder of this chapter contains the results of each agency's
assessment of water quality related to its dams, beginning with the
Bureau of Reclamation, and continuing through the Corps of Engineers and
TV A.  Each agency's section is organized as follows:

   1.   statement of policies and procedures followed by the agency in
        the development and management of water resources.

   2.   assessment of water quality with respect to the agency's dams.

   3.   recommendations for policies and practices for water quality
        aspects of dams and important related scientific and research
        needs.
                                        H-3

-------
                      THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

The Bureau of Reclamation of the U.S. Department  of  the Interior  Is
responsible for the development and conservation  of  the Nation's  water
resources In the Western United States.

Reclamation was formally begun 86  years  ago with  the passage of The
Reclamation Act of 1902.  In most  areas  of the 17 Western States,
which constitute the area served  by  the  Reclamation program, less than
20 inches of moisture falls each year.   However,  several Important
rivers,  fed mainly by the melting snow packs in the mountains, flows
through  these States.  A basic function  of Reclamation Is to harness
these streams and to store their surplus waters in times of heavy
runoff for  later use when the natural flow is  low.

Reclamation's original purpose "to provide for the  reclamation of arid
and  semi arid  lands  in the Vest" today covers a wide  range of
Interrelated  functions.  These Include providing municipal and
Industrial  water supplies;  hydroelectric  power generation; Irrigation
water for agriculture; water quality Improvident;  flood control;  river
 regulation and control;  fish and wildlife enhancement; outdoor
 recreation; and research 1n atmospheric water management and
 alternative energy sources, such  as wind  and solar  power.   Reclamation
 1s also a primary source of research  In design,  construction, and
 development of materials used in  water  management structures.
 Reclamation programs most frequently are  the result of close
 cooperation with the U.S. Congress,  other Federal agencies, States,
 local governments, academic Institutions, water-user organizations,
 and other concerned groups.
                                      H-4

-------
As of September 30, 1986, the Federal  Investment In completed
Reclamation project facilities totaled $8.7 billion.  This  Investment
Includes $1.7 billion In specific Irrigation facilities.  $1.7  billion
1n electric power facilities, $0.3 billion in nunlclpal and Industrial
facilities, and $5.0 billion In multipurpose and other facilities.
About 80 percent of this total Investment is reimbursable to the
Federal Treasury.  Reclamation project facilities In operation during
1986 included:  355 storage reservoirs; 254 diversion dams; 15,804
miles of canals; 1,382 wiles of pipelines; 276 miles of tunnels;
37,263 miles of laterals; 17,002 miles of project'drains; 240 pumping
plants; 50 hydroelectric powerplants; and 288 circuit miles of
transmission lines.  Nearly 10 million acres of Western farm land
receive full or supplemental  irrigation, over 20.5 million people
receive municipal  and Industrial water, 53.2 million visitor days of
recreation are recorded  annually, and 13.8 million kilowatts of
Installed hydroelectric  power capacity exists.

Completed water service  facilities are transferred to local water user
organizations  for  operation and  maintenance  as  soon as the
organizations  become capable of  assuming these  functions.  Reclamation
operates and maintains  hydroelectric  powerplants and  some  water
storage and supply works on multi-purpose  projects.  Of  the 235
 operating  projects or units providing service in 1986, 172 were
 operated entirely  by water user organizations,  39  were operated
 jointly by water user organizations  and Reclamation,  and 24 were
 operated entirely  by Reclamation.
                                      H-5

-------
Unique Features of  the Bureau  of  Reclamation

Among Federal programs,  the Reclamation program 1s unique 1n several
respects.  First.  It 1s  regional  In nature,  1t 1s United by
Reclamation Law to the  17  contiguous States  lying wholly or partly
west of the 100th  meridian.  Second, the Reclamation program has from
the beginning, in  contract to other Federal  public works programs,
been based on the  principle of repayment by direct beneficiaries
(water users, conservancy  districts, power customers, etc.)  As law
and policy were revised and broadened over the years to accommodate
multiple  purpose projects, some program costs became nonreimbursable.
The total amount repaid through fiscal year 1986 is  over $2  billion,
representing 23 percent of completed plant-in-service investment  of
(8.7  billion.  Repayment of costs  is greater  in Reclanation  than  in
any  other Federal  resource development program.

Another significant feature of the Reclamation program is  the economic
 analysis that  accompanies  any proposed project.  This evaluation
 consists of  (1) plan formulations  studies to  determine optimum size
 and mix of  features; (2) benefit-cost  analysis  aimed at the question
 of economic justification  for the  project;  (3)  cost allocation studies
 to assign costs to the  various  reimbursable and nonreimbursable
 functions;  and (4) repayment  analysis  to determine  if  the project
 reimbursable costs can  be repaid in accordance with requirements of
 law and  policy.
                                      H-6

-------
Reclamation's Salinity Control  Program

A large body of law surrounds the Reclamation salinity  control program
and specific projects.  The individual projects are subjected to
congressional hearings, authorization and funding.  In  1972, an
amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
Public Law 92-500 (known commonly as the Clean Water Act) sets forth a
public policy for restoration and maintenance of water quality
                                                    '-,'
standards, including benefical use designations and numeric salinity
criteria.  In June 1974, Congress enacted the Colorado River Basin
Salinity Control Act, Public Law 93-320, which directed the Secretary
of the Interior to proceed with a program to enhance and protect  the
quality of water available in the Colorado River for use in the
United States and the Republic of Mexico.  Reclamation is leading a
strong and aggressive salinity control program  launched by these acts
of Congress.

The  overall  approach  in meeting the  salinity standards for the
Colorado River 1s  to  prevent salt from entering and nixing with  the
 river's  flow.   A number of agricultural,  point, and diffuse sources of
 salinity  have  been identified  in  the Colorado River Basin.
 Reclamation's  salinity control  program will  Implement  controls at
 those sites  which  contain  salt  sources that  can be intercepted and
 prevented from entering the  river at least cost.

 The estimated salinity control  program potential, through  existing  and
 planned Reclamation projects coordinated with State and other Federal
 agencies, h^s a projected  total  salt reduction in the  Colorado River of
 2.06 billion tons per year.
                                        H-7

-------
The Changing Nature of the Reclamation Program

The shift in emphasis away from agriculture and toward municipal  and
industrial water, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement has
been the trend for the past two decades.  And as fewer large federally
financed water projects are constructed, Reclamation is responding by
developing alternative means of supplying water through Improved
system management, joint use of surface and ground-water supplies, and
re-evaluating priority of use.

Management of water  resources remains a critical necessity for the
arid west.  Reclamation is examing opportunities to Increase water and
power  operating  efficiencies and to Identify  opportunities for
non-Federal partnerships for water resource development.  The goals
and the objectives of Reclamation are:

      *  Continue to  provide the world's best  engineering and
         construction expertise  for water  resource  projects.
         Projects that are  justified  by  local  area  need, support
         and funding.

      -  Improve efficiency by  properly  maintaining;  upgrading
         and enhancing existing water and  power resource facilities.

      -  Emphasize non-structural  water efficiency  and conservation
         alternatives.

      -  Maintain the technical water development capability to
         assist State, and local governments, as well as other
         non-Federal entities.
                                        H-8

-------
Inprove joint tnd nultlple Und tnd water resource use,
Including perfecting recharge and conjunctive use programs
for ground Mater.

Continue leadership 1n establishing effective and
acceptable water quality programs and standards.

Maintain the safety of the Nation's dams, reservoirs
and waterways.

Develop remedies for water-related hazardous waste
problems.
                                H-9

-------
     ASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS IN BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
                        RESERVOIRS AND TAILWATKBS
Information on water quality conditions and user impacts for all Bureau
of Reclamation (USSR) storage reservoirs and tailwaters was solicited by
distributing a questionnaire (attachment A) developed at the Corps of
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES) to all six Bureau regional
offices.  All regions responded, and a total of 250 questionnaires were
returned.  The geographical distribution of this response by state is
shown in figure 1.  Since there are approximately 349 USER storage
reservoirs in eighteen western states (USBR 1986), this response
represents nearly 72% of the total.

Information obtained on the frequency of occurrence of various water
quality conditions in USBR reservoirs and their impact upon user benefits
are summarized in figures 2 and 3, respectively.  Tailwater conditions
and their impacts are shown in figures 4 and 5, respectively.

What is most immediately apparent in these four figures is that in an
average of 54% of the reservoir cases and 59% of the taiiwater cases,
there are no data upon which to make an evaluation of the conditions or
their impact on user benefits.  Further, if the assumption is made that
the reason that no questionnaires were received on the other
approximately 99 USBR reservoirs listed in the 1986 statistical
compilation is that no data were available, then the total  percentages
of no data would rise to 68% for reservoirs and 71% for tailwaters.

Water quality data are usually only collected on a particular project
when some problem is noted or suspected, or when some change in the
structure or operation is contemplated.  Consequently, the picture of
water quality conditions in Bureau reservoirs and tailwaters given by the
available information is probably somewhat skewed toward those situations
where some problem is perceived or an impact is felt.  The following
assessment is, therefore, probably rather conservative.

Data sources for  figures 6 through 9 are the same as figures 2 through 5,
except  that the percentages are based only on those cases for which data
are available.  The  total number (N) of reservoirs or tailwaters with
information on a  particular condition is iit»i.ed on the right side of each
graph.   These numbers range from 56 to  149, or  from  16% to 43% of USBR
storage reservoirs.

Figures 6 and  7 suggest that  tne iuain conditions  affecting user benefits
in Bureau reservoirs are drawdown, pool fluctuation, turbidity, sediment,
and shore erosion.   None of these  are water quality  conditions per  se,
but arise from the way water  storage reservoirs are  operated in an  arid
climate, where spring snowmelt  or  winter rains  are the major source of
runoff, and  drawdown is continuous throughout the long dry  season.
Drawdown was  rated as having  a  severe  impact on user benefits  in  six USBR
 impooundments, and a significant  impact in 33 others,  out  of a total
sample of  107  reservoirs with information  available.   Thus,  the
 cumulative percentage of reservoirs with data  in  which drawdown was rated
                                        H-10

-------
as having at least a significant impact on user benefits is 36.4%.
Corresponding cumulative percentages for the other four conditions are:
pool fluctuation 35.3%, turbidity 13.2%, sediment 12.8%, and shore
erosion 10.2%.  The last condition, shore erosion, had no severe impact
ratings out of a total of 108 impoundments ratea.

The second ""~st important set of reservoir water quality conditions
affecting user benefits are related to eutrophication: algae, high
nutrients, low dissolved oxygen, and taste and odor problems.  Cumulative
percentages of reservoirs with data where these conditions were rated as
having at least significant impacts on user benefits were: algae 16.5%,
high nutrients 15.2%, low dissolved oxygen 13.5%, and taste and odor
problems 11.8%.  There were no severe impact ratings for high nutrients
or taste and odor problems, however.

Although iron is often present in Bureau reservoirs (figure 6), it was
rated as having at least a significant impact on user benefits in only
4.4% of the rated reservoirs (figure 7).  In fact, it should be noted
that only drawdown and pool fluctuation were perceived as having really
significant impacts on reservoir user benefits (figure 7).

Tailvater conditions and user impacts are depicted in figures 8 and 9,
respectively.  Here again, the major impact-producing conditions seem to
cluster around the mode of operation of water supply reservoirs in an
arid region: high flow, low flow, turbidity, and high temperature.  Of
these, high flow was rated as having significant user impacts in 21.1% of
the tailwaters with data, but in no case was it rated as having a severe
impact.  The other three conditions were rated as having at least a
significant impact in 13.2%, 11.6%, and 10.9% of the rated tailwaters,
respectively.  Taste and odor problems were rated as significant in 13.3%
of the tailwaters with available data, uut were not considered severe in
any case.
                               CONCLUSIONS

Three main conclusions may be drawn from this assessment of water quality
in USER reservoirs and tailwaters.

   1.   Data on water quality conditions and user impacts for about 30%
        of the Bureau's approximately 349 storage reservoirs are
        presented here.  Since this group is somewhat biased toward
        projects where problems have been noted or suspected, the
        resulting assessmenr may be a bit pessimistic.
        The main impact-producing conditions identified for Bureau
        reservoirs are drawdown and pool fluctuation, which are
        associated with a mode of operation that combines rapid spring
        filling of reservoirs with a steady withdrawal of water to
        satisfy irrigation, municipal, and industrial demands during the
        long dry season.  These two conditions were rated as having at
        least significant impacts on user benefits in 36.4% and 35.3%,
        respectively, of the reservoirs with available data.
                                       H-ll

-------
High flow was the main impact-producing condition noted in USER
tailwaters, probably reflecting the high spring inflows and
spillway discharges of the mid-19801 s.  This condition was rated
as having a significant impact on user benefits in 21.1Z of the
rated tailwaters, but in no case was the impact rated as severe.
The next two impact-producing conditions cited were low flow and
taste and odor problems, each witn a cumulative rating of at
least significant in about 13% of tv>«» tailwaters with available
data. There were no severe ratings for tailrace taste and odor
problems, however.
                       REFERENCES

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1986. Statistical Compilation of
Engineering Features on Bureau of Reclamation Projects. USER,
Denver, CO, 167 pp.
                              H-12

-------
                                                                0?
                                                            C3   rv
                                                            O
H-13

-------
o

it
O t/l
oc ui
a: to
OCD
 Odd
 tu 2

 «>io
 UJ
 a:
 z>
 o
 d
                                                                       
-------
cnm
z
-------
 o
 in
 CM
 II
 2^

 vf
UJ
c/>
UJ
o:

a:
m
en
  _
o
to
a:


l
o
E
o
•z.
o
o
Or
a:
UJ


I
CL

13

O
      *tf

     0
          i
€>
e
                                                                                                 V»
                                                                                                 5

                                                                                                 8
     cu
         o
         l—>

         o
         oc

         o
                                                                                           X
                                                                                           UJ
                                            H-16

-------
o
in
CO
CC
 i
to
UJ

2
UJ
CD
to
ID

2-
O
O

DC
u.
o
o

I


If)
UJ
a:
Z5
O
                                                                  O
                                                                  O
                                                               _  in
                                                                              LJ
                                                                              «I
                                                                              a.
                    O
                    m
                                on
                                o
                                                                           01
                    iO
                    CM


Bill's
         C\£Q o
   0 v> « O I   Q_
   o   o *>
  T   J- •*-*
  2.   X. OT
                                UJ
                                cc
                                                                           O
                                                                           
-------
                                            oicjico  o  «cj-  n  en o
                                              o O  «—t
3
Ixl ~
II
UJ
UIC/)

oo
uicr

Eg


                                                                         Q-
                                                                              ru
o w o TJ zi
~ c  * ~ -^
                 o
         o>
         8
0)

"o
CO
to
Q
  JOWOTWOT-^CCCt^.DW



  <£  o«c5cx:  E"5  S O5*oo
  •«O»*-    Q-'D*^uj"o^-O*»
     r-»3    P*>Po?2>mp
                                                                              X
                                                                              LU
                                    o»
                                    X
                                         H-18

-------
"§
OLU

Q_ LU
  LJ
O
iZ

                                                                    CU
                                                                       «J,

                                                                       *•*

                                                                   LJ  vt
                                                                       o:
                                                                    o
                                                                    
-------
to
UJ

I
to
oc
UJ
to
UJ
o:

cc
m
to
to
a:
UJ

I
to

o

5

a
o
 o
  « a. to «> «> c
ft- ft. ^K ^P>% *••» « * ^M.
       ca
       o
       on
       CL.
€»
    ™  p
    n  s
    Ji
                                                                        o
                                                                        o:
    UJ
    I-
    X
    UJ
                                   H-20

-------
UJ

(T

§
o:

£
2

 I
  .
LJ

5
m

o:
UJ
(O
ID
 _

 O
 o:


 i
              O f^ o  vo CM  «—« O  r-- o  —• o *=r LT>  001  CTI o  CT> G"> in u~> UD
                oo •—<  co •—<  cr> 01  en o  o o ^r »—«  cr> »-i  .—i o  01 00 *£> r-- ro cr>  in
                                                                             I
                                                                              II
                                                                                I   «*
                                                                                I   *••
                                                                              _J   «o
 O)

 ui
 o:
 ^
 o
C t> O *> >» >  3t  ^4>«>CLOT«COCW«>CO-JiC)r>sOW

o 2 O ^2»— o  o  o ^ ^ P ^ "5 ^ o ^~ ~ o v 5;  o .2 •— *c ^
 3  O 0>C  -  -
*— _J -4: ^S  CL Q.
                                                                                                         /
                                                                              o
                                                                              %
                                     5  E E --g >
                                    ^J  Q^ ^J _L O

                                    "o *~ *~ 3 co
                                 §•2
                                CO
                                                             «  ox


                                                            -c"§
                                                            oo  5
                                                    H-21

-------
                         RECOHMEHDATIONS
The following recommendations represent ideas that should help
Congress better evaluate water quality (WQ) issues relating to
dams and impoundments.  All of the ideas are more or less related
and will have direct implications for all of the water resource
management agencies (USER, COE, TV A, referred to as the Agen-
cies).  The principal policy implications of these recommenda-
tions are that the Agencies will need to shift more priority
towards WQ issues anu cooperate to accomplish technical goals.
Thus coordination between the Agencies will be a primary require-
ment of these initiatives.  The section following the recommenda-
tions provides a suggested organizational structure for these
activities.
1.  Avoid establishing uniform standards for WQ of impoundments
and dan discharges that ignore regional differences between res-
ervoirs and the often conflicting demands of water users.

A cursory examination of the WQ summaries seen in Figures 2
through 9 reveals that the problems identified for reservoirs in
the arid West are very different from those in the East.  Nutri-
ent loading and eutrophication are the principal concern for TVA
reservoirs that are located in a much more industrialized and
densely populated area.  In the West, pool fluctuations and flow
are the major concern for USER reservoirs.

Most projects must plan the O&M of their reservoirs to balance
the WQ (or water supply) demands of many user groups, each with
often contradictory requirements.  Each reservoir has a unique
set of water uses and range of WQ conditions, and compromises are
often necessary since WQ cannot alway» be maximized for every
user.  Rigid WQ standards would ignore the complexity of reser-
voir O&M vs. user WQ demands, and remove the flexibility neces-
sary to prioritize water uses.

For example, selective withdrawal to maximize downstream WQ for
fisheries may conflict with protection of WQ in the reservoir.
Reservoir fisheries and recreation may suffer to benefit down-
stream fisheries or vice versa.  Resolving such issues is
difficult and requires that the Agencies maintain management
flexibility to prioritize water uses.  While uniform WQ standards
do  represent a simple and expedient  approach, they would prevent
the Agencies from considering the complex mix of user demands
necessary to properly manage reservoirs.
 2.  Establish a cnmmnn. geographic information system/data base
 (GIS/DB) for all national water resource agency impoundments.
                                       H-22

-------
One of the major difficulties in studying this subject on a national
scale is the lack of a unified data set with comprehensive and
unbiased information.  Given the current situation where each
agency has incomplete and unvalidated data sets stored in incom-
patible computer formats (or in printed summaries), it is diffi-
cult to make an accurate or reasonably precise evaluation of dam
water quality problems at the national level.

Water quality problems do not occur regularly in impoundments or in
downstream releases.  However, in certain situations, depending upon many
factors discussed in this report, water quality problems can and do
occur.  Preventative measures must then be instituted in new projects or
corrective actions taken at existing facilities.  In order to identify
the locations, causes, and nature of water quality problems, an inventory
of water quality at major Federal impoundments is needed.  Such a data
base would be a valuable resource for improved management of national
water resources.  Inventories by Reclamation, COE, and TVA, prepared on a
compatible basis, would contain information typical of most situations in
the U.S.  With proper coordination with non-Federal dam owners, the
usefulness and scope of these three data bases could be further expanded.

The Agencies should establish a common, validated GIS/DB that
would contain layers of data currently available from other
sources (USGS, EPA, etc,) along with data specifically related to
water projects.

A common format, distributed GIS would allow the retrieval of
other agency data when needed and would provide Congress, and
State and Federal environmental enforcement agencies rapid access
to both quantitative data and subjective evaluations for water
quality in reservoirs.  This would facilitate improved decision
processes for identifying water quality problems and provide a
means for researchers, planners, and policy makers to evaluate
the relationships between water quality and other variables such
as land use, population, reservoir morphology, pollution sources,
and O&M strategies.

Technical Aspects

Examples of currently available digital data sets that could be
of use  in evaluating the water quality problems of impoundments
include:

               ** USGS digital elevation data
               ** USGS streamflow and Benchmark Sample WQ data
               ** USGS bedrock geology maps
               ** SCS soil  classification  (mineralogy) maps
               ** USDA crop cover maps
               ** USFS timber cover maps
               ** Specific  land  classification  and vegetative
                     cover studies based on digital analysis of
                     remote  sensing data and  satellite  images
               ** EPA STORET water quality data
               ** EPA National Surface Water Survey  alkalinity
                                      H-23

-------
                    maps
               ** Subjective evaluations of WQ problems,
                    severity, and frequency from COE data set
               ** USER acid precipitation sensitivity data
               ** Engineering blueprints for TVA, COE, USER dams
               ** Population and economic data
               ** NOAA meteorological data
               ** Historical O&M records
               ** Hydrology data for specific projects
               ** Dam safety data for specific projects

The Agencies should agree to adopt hardware, software, and data
format protocols currently being used and developed by the USGS
in order to take advantage of available digital data sets and to
ensure data compatability.  ARC/INTO is a GIS/DB that is widely
used and is available on VAX minicomputers.  USGS is also devel-
oping microcomputer-based GIS systems that rely on compact disk
technology to store large data sets.

By adopting standard configurations, a lower-cost, distributed
approach to the GIS/DB can be used that eliminates the need for
expensive mainframe computers and management of a centralized
"super" data system.  Each individual Agency would be responsi-
ble only for data directly related to their projects, and would
import other data sets for specific data evaluation tasks.  In a
similar manner, national evaluations could be performed by tem-
porarily combining the Agency records for the most recent infor-
mation.

The final, and possibly most important aspect of this effort
involves implementation of a thorough quality assurance/quality
control (QA/QC) program for data entered into the GIS/DB.  This
would address the issues of reliability of existing data,
establishment of appropriate techniques for WQ sampling and
chemical analyses, and procedures for documentation, error
detection and correction.  The major portion of these protocols
have already been established by EPA and USGS, so minimal
development time will be required.

Policy Implications

The most significant policy  implications of the GIS/DB will be
the necessity of securing development and  long-term maintenence
funding from Congress, and adjusting Agency priorities to reflect
a stronger and more consistent committment to water quality is-
sues.  To this end it is recommended that  Congress be provided
with  information that would  encourage the  development of this
GIS/DB.  Also, the ongoing USGS GIS activities should be encour-
aged  and promoted by the water resources agencies.

The development of a GIS/DB  represents  a complex task that will
require careful planning  and coordination  between the water
resource agencies, EPA, USGS and  several other Federal  and State
agencies.  While organizational structures are  in place for
                                      H-24

-------
coordination between the water resource agencies, development of
a GIS/DB will require a wider and more comprehensive coordination
effort.

We would recommend that an Interagency Management Oversight Group
be formed to guide the development of the GIS/DB (and other WQ-
related initiatives).  A permanent GIS/DB Working Task Group,
comprised of technical personnel who would be responsible for
implementing and maintaining the system, and providing the inter-
agency peer-communication necessary to maximize available resour-
ces and prevent costly duplication of effort, should be
appointed.

Members of the Management Oversight Group would provide policy
review, help to champion the GIS/DB concept inside their respec-
tive agencies, and encourage the proper funding priority to en-
sure a successful effort.
3.  Pursue Congressional appropriations to adequately fund
reservoir monitoring programs.

One of the major problems with the STORET WQ data used in the
contractor report is that the available reservoir data is usually
collected during problem episodes, thus introducing significant
bias in the data.   Also, WQ monitoring programs are inconsis-
tently funded, often resulting in non-representative data sets,
poor planning, lack of sampling design or quality assurance.  In
order to address these problems, the following is recommended:

          **  Establish a standard funding period for post-
          impoundment and post-mitigation action monitoring.

          **  Develop a stratified, randomized monitoring
          program, much like the EPA Surface Water Survey, that
          would provide an unbiased background data set to use
          for national WQ evaluations in reservoirs.

          **  Develop Congressional committment to WQ by
          encouraging a consistent, long-term approach to funding
          of reservoir WQ monitoring.

          **  Ensure that monitoring is performed in accordance
          with accepted QA/QC protocols to guarantee quality of
          data.

          **  Include validated data in the reservoir GIS.

Technical Aspects

Monitoring should be performed with an adequate QA/QC program  in
place, and resulting data should be included in the GIS/DB.
Development of a statistically randomized "background" sampling
program will be based on currently accepted methods for water
                                      H-25

-------
quality sample network design.

Policy Implications

This recommendation is closely related to the GIS/DB initiative
and shares many of the policy issues identified above.  While
Congress would have to appropriate funding for monitoring activ-
ities, it is also important to remember that the Agencies must
also develop an internal committment to water quality and moni-
toring that will ensure consistent long-term priority.

Establishment of a common QA/QC program for reservoir monitoring,
a task that will also be important to the GIS/DB, will require
coordination between the Agencies.  It is recommended that the
QA/QC and the water quality monitoring network design for the
randomized program be developed by an interagency technical group
with review by EPA and statisticians familiar with sampling
design.
4.  Develop better methods for Measuring the relationship between
WQ problems and effects on user benefits.

A discussion of water quality problems implies an adverse effect
on some recognized use of the water; e.g., drinking water, body
contact recreation, fish production, or agriculture.  In recent
years, the economic impacts of salinity have been measured and
are currently used to select cost-effective alternatives for
meeting treaty WQ obligations for the Colorado River. Unfortun-
ately, there is no such standardized approach or methodology
available to quantify relationships between concentrations of
WQ constituents and the effects on user benefits or costs.  Thus,
it is difficult to assign costs, to WQ problems or the mitigation
strategies chosen for a given problem.

By developing these relationships, agencies could prioritize
corrective action plans based on the severity of impacts to eco-
nomic benefits, recreational use, or intangibles such as aesthe-
tic quality.  This priorxtization would also assist in the plan-
ning and design of cost-effective mitigation measures.

Technical Aspects

This process would involve applied research to develop and/or
evaluate existing methods for quantifying the costs (or loss of
benefits) associated with specific WQ constituents.  Such an
effort would require expertise  in risk assessment and related
statistical specialties.

Policy Implications

 Investigation and  implementation  of  this  idea will  once again
 require  coordination between the  Agencies, and an appropriate
 technical task  group should  be  formed that will  report to the
                                      H-26

-------
Interagency Management Oversight Group.  Policy guidance will
also be needed to establish appropriate risk factors inherent for
different WQ constituents and intended reservoir use.
5.  Encourage public involvement in reservoir WQ issues by
establishing Citizen Advisory Boards or Councils.

Citizens1 Advisory Councils would help the Agencies identify
priority WQ issues in reservoirs and provide an organized
mechanism for public input or advise.  Such Councils or Boards
would also help Agencies in several other important ways:

          **  Advisory Council(s) would foster a more cooperative
          relationship between agencies, environmental groups,
          user interest groups, and the general public.  The net
          result would be a more positive public image for the
          agencies and a more obvious committment to water
          quality issues.

          **  Good communication regarding WQ problems from the
          public would prevent embarrassing public relations
          problems due to lack of responsiveness through the
          usual bureaucratic channels.

          **  The Advisory Council(s) would help provide lobbying
          influence for funding of research and monitoring of WQ
          problems in reservoirs.

Technical Aspects

None, although informed technical personnel should be involved in
Advisory Council activities.

Policy Implications

Once again, coordination between agencies should be important.
Advisory Councils may be nationally-oriented, however, it is more
likely that they will be of local interest.  One agency's
experience with a particular problem could be very valuable in
helping another deal with the public on sensitive environmental
issues.  An interagency task group that meets occasionally should
provide the means for effectively sharing such experiences.
                  ****************************
 The recoonendations detailed above should be coordinated accord-
 ing to the organizational chart detailed on the following page.
                                      H-27

-------
Organizational Structure for implementation of WQ recommendations
           ******************************************
           * INTERAGENCY MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT GROUP *
           ******************************************

       Personnel: Agency administrators with WQ experience

        Function:  Policy oversight, program funding and
                 advocacy, Congressional liason
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
                   **************************
                   * GIS/DB Technical Group *
                   **************************

      Personnel: Technical with CIS and computer experience

Function: Develop and coordinate approach, procurement and lAGs,
               and actual implementation of system
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
                 ******************************
                 * Risk/Cost Assessment Group *
                 ******************************

   Personnel: Technical with EIS, risk analysis and statistics
                           experience.

      Function: Develop and implement assessment methodology
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
                                *
              ***************************************
              * Advisory Council Coordination Group *
              ***************************************

Personnel:  Administrative with WQ and public relations experience

       Function:  Communication  between Agencies  on WQ  Issues
                                        H-28

-------
                             APPENDIX I
                   AGENCY QUESTIONNAIRE USED IN
                      DEVELOPING ASSESSMENTS
                            SUPPLEMENT
Information is needed  to  prepare  a  summary statement  on the present
status of water quality at  Bureau dams.   This will  be used in a  section
prepared by the Bureau for  a  report by EPA to be  submitted to Congress
on water quality and dams.
                              INSTRUCTIONS

For each dam, complete the questionnaire using available information
and knowledge based upon day-to-day familiarity with the project.

Water Quality Evaluation

For dams or items for which information is not available, enter:  NIA.

Provide the name of the dam, project,  and category using the following:

  Category

   A.  Constructed and operated  by Bureau of Reclamation

   B.  Rehabilitated and operated by Bureau of Reclamation

   C.  Constructed by others, operated by Bureau of Reclamation

   D.  Under construction by Bureau of Reclamation

   E.  Constructed by Bureau of  Reclamation, operated by others

   F.  Rehabilitated by Bureau of Reclamation, operated by others

   G.  Constructed and operated  by others

   H.  Constructed under loan program

The evaluation table lists several commonly cited water quality considerations
for reservoir projects.  For each water quality consideration and each
project location type (i.e., tributary, pool, and tailwater), evaluate
the extent of the problem (Column a),  the relative impact on user benefits
(Column b), and the reliability of data upon which the evaluation is
based  (Column c).  Brief remarks which would aid in the interpretation
of this information may be entered where indicated.
                                       1-1

-------
     Problem Evaluation (Column a)
    -_

     0 :No  problem evaluation has been Bade.
     1 s Chronic or continuous problea.
     2 :Intermittent problea occurring on • seasonal or event basis.
     3 :Occasional problea occurring infrequently on an annual basis.
     4 :No  problea.

     User Xepact (Column b)
    Code
      0  :Information concerning user impacts is not available.
      1  :Severe impact resulting in the longtent  loss of one or store
          user benefits.
      2  :Significant Impact Mhich restricts but does not eliminate
          user benefits.
      3  :Minor impact which does not restrict  user benefits.
      4  :No impact on user benefits.

     Data Reliability (Column c)
     Code
      0  :Deta or infor&ation are not available.
      1  :Based on reliable data covering appropriate tine fra&e.
      2  :Based on scattered or incomplete data.
      3  :Based on infomal information.

Water crudity considerations  for  which  evaluations  are  requested  are
briefly  described below.

    Iron -  Elevated  concentrations of dissolved or particulate iron.
    tenganese - Elevated  concentrations of dissolved or particulate
    •engines*.
3.  Low Dissolved Oxygen  -  Concentrations beloK saturation.
4.  Hydrogen sulfide * Elevated  concentrations or obvious odors.
5.  Turbidity -  Reduced water clarity due to suspended inorganic solids.
6.  Low Flow - Insufficient flow in the tailwter.
7.  Eigh How -  Excessive discharge flows in the  tailtater.
6.  Fluctuating  Flc« - Excessive or unnatural changes  ir  floa.
S.  low Temperature - Temperature below expected  or desirable level.
10.  Elgh Temperature - Temperature above expected or desirable level.
11.  nuctUBting Temperature - Undesirable changes in temperature.
12.  Dissolved Solids - Elevated concentrations of total dissolved solids.
12.  betel Contaminants - Elevated concentrations of ftetals other than iron
     end langanese.
14.  Organic  Contaminants - Presence of man-Bade organic coapounds.
 IS.  Gts Supersaturatioi. - Dissolved nitrogen gas concentration above
     saturation.
 1€.  Eigh Nutrients  -  Excessive nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations.
 17.  £Lgae  -  Excessive algal biotas s or chlorophyll concentration.
                                         1-2

-------
18. K&crophytes - Excessive or undesirable growths of rooted or floating
    aquatic  plants.
19. Sediaent Accu&ulation - Excessive or undesirable sediment accumulation.
20. DraHdown - Prolonged periods of IOM pool elevation Kith undesirable
    iapacts.
21. Pool Elevation Fluctuation - Undesirable i&pacts due changing pool.
22. Shoreline  Erosion - Loss of banks or shoreline due to erosion.
23.'Taste and  Odor - Taste or odor in raw and/or finished potable tater.
24. pH or Acidity -  pR significantly below neutrality or nigh level of
    acidity.
25. Bacteria - Excessive levels of any sdcrobe.
26. Parasites  - Presence of any aniaal or hua&n parasite.
27. Other - Specify other stater quality considerations as needed.
28. Other - Specify other Mater quality considerations as needed.
29. Other - Specify other Mater quality considerations as needed.
30. Other - Specify other Mater quality considerations as needed.
                                          1-3

-------
1.  Dam:
3. Category;
-
I !
1 Kater Quality |
1 Consideration I
!, T " '

I Tributary
I •
1 	
IX. Iron ||
I ii
{2. Kanganese ||
1 it
|3. LOH D.O. ||
I II
14. Bydrogen Sulfide ||
15. Turbidity ||
1 M
Ife. Low Flow ||
1 II 	 	
17. High Flow ||
1 II
IE. Fluctuating Flow |
IS- Low TcMerature
I
|1C. High Teaoeraturc
1
Ill.Fluctuating lesp.
|12.Dis3olvc4 Solids
I
|13.Ketel Contaminant
1
IK.Orotnlc Conterir*.
!
|15. Ges Sur>ersaturat.
I
I It. High Kutrientr
1
jL7.Alcee
!
IlE.Kacroshvtcj
I
I IS. Sediment Accut.
i
«
|2C .DraMOKs
I
1 21. Pool Eiev nuct.
I
|22. Shore Eros.
I
I


	








—
WHHW
t
-











«^™^«^








w—_
c
	
	





	
^— —
^_^^^_












mm ^_^

&•
rrojeci:
Pool || ItUwter
M
a
_
_





	














— m^^m
b





















VH^^V
c || a
M
II
||
II
II
II
II
II
||
II
II
II
l|
II
_ 11
II
(I
II
|l
1











_
1












b






















c





















•••^^H
fie&arks |










-

-










                                  1-4

-------
 Water Quality Description  (Continued):
| || Tributary II Pool || Ttilmter
f Rater Ou.lity II II II
| Consideration || a
I II
| 23. Taste and Odor ||
I II
|24.pH/Acidity ||
1 II
1 25. Bacteria ||
1 II
(26. Parasites ||
1 II
I27.0ther £ )|l
1 II
I2B. Other i )ll
1 II
129. Other ( )ll
1 II
130. Other I )ll
1 II
b








c II a
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
II
II
i;
b








c II a
II
1







1







b








c








Eenarks









•fr U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1989— 617-003 ' 0 "» 8 6 1
                                             1-5

-------