EPA530-R-92-014a PB92-922 401 MONTHLY HOTLINE REPOI ,.-,l; • r -, January 1992 RCRA/SF/OUST and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know 'f stStr Hotline Questions and Answers Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) 2 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know 2 New Publications Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 4 Federal Registers Final Rules 5 Proposed Rules 6 Notices 6 Call Analyses Calls Answered Caller Profiles Hotline Topics 9 12 14 RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline National Toll Free No.: 800-424-9346 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Hotline National Toll Free No.: 800-535-0202 This report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039. EPA Project Officer: Barbara Roth, (202) 260-2858 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 Printed on Recycled Paper ------- HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. RCRA Regulatory Status of Waste from Oil Gathering Pipelines An oil production facility uses gathering pipelines to transport oil from its production site to a site owned by another facility. The oil has already undergone initial oil/water separation. Waste forms in the gathering lines during the transportation of the oil. Is the waste that forms subject to the hazardous waste exclusion at 40 CFR§261.4(b)(5)? The answer depends on the ownership of the oil at the time the waste forms. Section 261.4(b)(5) excludes drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil, natural gas, or geothermal energy from the definition of hazardous waste. Waste generated after legal custody of the oil changes hands during transportation will not meet the exclusion because it is not intrinsic to the exploration, development, or production of crude oil. The July 6,1988, Federal Register (53 ER 25446, footnote 1) defines associated wastes as those wastes other than produced water, rigwash, and drilling muds and cuttings that are intrinsic to exploration, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas. The Report to Congress: Management of Wastes from the Exploration. Development, and Production of Crude Oil. Natural Gas, and Geothermal Energy. VOL 1 of 3 (EPA/530-SW-88-003-A, Dec. 1987) states on page 11-17 that "[t]he phrase 'intrinsically derived from the primary field operations' is intended to differentiate exploration, development, and production operations from transportation (from the point of custody transfer or of production separation and dehydration) and manufacturing operations." Accordingly, any waste generated after a change in the custody of the oil or, in the absence of the change in custody after the initial oil/water separation, is not subject to the §261.4(b)(5) hazardous waste exclusion because it is not intrinsic to the exploration, development, or production of crude oil. 2. Funding for the RCRA Program and RCRA Reauthorization What is the current status of the funding for the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program? When will the RCRA statute be reauthorized? When the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) amended RCRA, §2007(a) authorized funding for the RCRA program through September 30,1988. There have been no changes made to §2007(a) since 1984. Instead, funding for the RCRA program has been provided through an annual Congressional "de-facto" appropriations process. Through this process, Congress is able to appropriate money to EPA without going through the lengthy process of reauthorizing the statute. If Congress does not appropriate money, the funding for the program would expire. EPA's authority to regulate pursuant to RCRA, however, is separate from all funding issues and would not be affected. Several different bills addressing various solid and hazardous waste issues have been introduced in the House and the Senate. ------- Hotline Questions and Answers January 1992 CERCLA EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW 3. Core Program Cooperative Agreements 4. Section 313: Otherwise Use Activity What are Core Program Cooperative Agreements? CERCLA §104(d)(l) authorizes EPA to award cooperative agreements with States, political subdivisions, and Federally recognized Indian tribes. A Core Program Cooperative Agreement (CA) is a legal instrument EPA can use to transfer funds to a State, Federally recognized Indian tribe, or a State's political subdivision to support CERCLA implementation activities. EPA intends the Core Program to help lay the groundwork for the implementation of the integrated EPA-State/ tribe approach to meeting Superfund goals. The regulations regarding State, political subdivision, and Federally recognized Indian tribe involvement in the Superfund program are found in the National Contingency Plan at 40 CFR §300.515. The requirements for CAs are discussed in the June 5,1990, Federal Register (55 FR 22994), and codified at 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart O, Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for Superfund Response. These funds are not assignable to specific sites, but are intended to develop and maintain participation in the CERCLA response program. All activities that are not site-specific and that are necessary to support a recipient's Superfund program are eligible for Core Program funding. Examples include the development of recordkeeping systems, the general coordination of administration and/or management activities associated with removals, and the development of a 20-year State Waste Capacity Assurance Plan. The number of Core Program CAs has increased from 3 in 1987 to 46 in 1991. States are required to provide a 10 percent cost share for Core Program awards. A facility covered under §313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to- Know Act (40 CFR Pan 372) manufactures shoes. During production the facility uses adhesives that contain solvents such as acetone and toluene. Due to the inefficiency of the process, 20 percent of the solvent remains behind in the shoes when they are sold in commerce. Would the facility count the amount of solvent remaining in the shoes toward the 25,000-pound processing threshold? No. The amount of solvent used in the adhesive would count toward the 10,000- pound otherwise use threshold. Since the retention of the solvents in the adhesives used to produce the shoes is unintentional, it would not be considered processed. Thus, the facility would file a Form R if it meets a 10,000-pound otherwise use threshold for the acetone or toluene in the adhesive. 5. Section 301: Establishment of a Local Emergency Planning Committee A Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) must be representative of different groups and organizations, as described in §301 (c) of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title HI. It states that, at a minimum, an LEPC must include "...representatives from each of the following groups or organizations: elected State and local officials; law enforcement, civil defense, firefighting, first aid, health, local environmental, hospital, and transportation personnel; broadcast and print media; community groups; and owners and operators ------- January 1992 Hotline Questions and Answers of facilities subject to the requirements of this subtitle." Does an LEPC have to consist of one individual representative from each group and organization, or can one member of an LEPC represent more than one group or organization listed? In order for an LEPC to properly carry out its duties, such as developing and distributing an emergency plan and responding to public comment, it must consist of representatives from different groups and organizations as described in §301 (c). One member of an LEPC can be the representative for more than one group or organization, but the LEPC must include representatives from all the groups and organizations listed in the statute. For example, a member of the LEPC could be both the community group representative and the hospital representative, assuming that person is involved in both organizations. ------- NEW PUBLICATIONS ^HOW TO ORDER NTIS Publications are available by calling (703) 487-4650, or writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road. Springfield, VA 22161. Be sure to include the NTIS Order Number listed under the document. Hotline Publications are available through the RCRA/Superfund/OUST Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at 1-800-424-9346. Be sure to include the EPA Order Number (if any) listed under the document. RCRA TITLE: EPA Fact Sheeet: "EPA Amends Monitoring Well Requirements for Interim Status Hazardous Waste Facilities" AVAILABILITY: Hotline EPA ORDER NO.: EPA/530-SW-91-087 EPA created comprehensive standards for owners and operators of TSDFs. Under these standards, interim status facility owners or operators operating certain management units must install and operate a system to monitor ground water for hazardous waste contamination. EPA is amending the 1980 standards to allow alternate placement of downgradient monitoring wells. TITLE: EPA Fact Sheet: "Capacity Assurance Planning and the 1991 Biennial Report" AVAILABILITY: Hotline EPA ORDER NO.: EPA/530-SW-91-082 The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Section 104(c)(9) requires that States receiving funds for remedial action provide capacity assurance deemed adequate by the EPA. The biennial report is the national report that EPA compiles describing demographics of, and trends in hazardous waste generation and management. TITLE: EPA Fact Sheet: "EPA Guideline for Purchasing Cement and Concrete Containing Fly Ash" AVAILABILITY: Hotline EPA ORDER NO.: EPA/530-SW-91-086 On January 28,1983, EPA issued a guideline for purchasing cement containing fly ash. It requires all Federal agencies and all State and local government agencies and contractors that use Federal funds to purchase cement and concrete to implement a preference program favoring the purchase of cement and concrete containing coal fly ash. TITLE: "RCRA/SF Monthly Hotline Reports" AVAILABILITY: NTIS NTIS ORDER NO.: contact Hotline The RCRA/SF Monthly Hotline Reports are now available from NTIS. Back year sets are available to June 1982. The 1992 Reports, including this Report, will soon be available on a subscription basis. Also available are individual copies of the Reports. The Reports contain questions that were either significant and required EPA resolution or were frequently-asked. Also included are the Federal Register summaries, publications availabilities, and call statistics. ------- FEDERAL REGISTERS FINAL RULES RCRA "Criteria for Listing Wastes as Hazardous" January 2,1992 (57 EB12) EPA finalizes the July 19,1991 (56 FR 33238), proposed rule to confirm 40 CFR §261.1 l(a)(3) to reflect die Agency's intent and interpretation of one of the criteria for listing wastes as hazardous. The effective date was January 13,1992. "Final Approval of Vermont's Underground Storage Tank Program" January 3,1992 (57 FR 186) EPA grants final approval to Vermont to operate its underground storage tank program. The effective date was February 3,1992. "Liners and Leak Detection Systems for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Units" January 29,1992 (57 FR 34762) EPA amended the current regulations concerning liner and leachate collection and removal systems for hazardous waste surface impoundments, landfills, and waste piles. EPA also added new regulations requiring owners and operators of hazardous waste surface impoundments, waste piles, and landfills to install and operate leak detection systems when new units are added, laterally expanded, or replaced. The effective date is July 29,1992. "Codification of Hlinois's Revised State Program" January 31,1992 (57 F_B 3722) EPA codified recent revisions to Elinois's authorized waste program. The effective date is March 31,1992. Comments will be accepted until March 2,1992. "Codification of Michigan's Revised State Program" January 31,1992 (57 FR 3724) EPA codified recent revisions to Michigan's authorized waste program. The effective date is March 31,1992. Comments will be accepted until March 2,1992. CERCLA "Deletion of Two Sites From the National Priorities List" January 6,1992 (57 FR 355) EPA deletes two sites from the NPL: Beachwood/Berkeley Wells in Ocean County, New Jersey, and Johns Sludge Pond in Wichita, Kansas. The effective date was January 6,1992. Copies of RCRA Federal Registers are available through the Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at 1-800-424-9346. ------- Federal Registers January 1992 PROPOSED RULES RCRA "Land Disposal Restriction for Newly Listed Wastes and Contaminated Debris" January 9,1992 (57 EB 958) EPA proposes treatment standards for certain newly identified hazardous wastes, and also proposes to revise treatment standards for contaminated debris. Comments will be accepted until February 24,1992. CERCLA "United States v. Acolor Company, et al." January 2, 1992 (57 EB 69) DO J gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree . Acolor Company, et al. lodged NOTICES RCRA "United States v. Com-Pak Engineering. Inc.. and Eugene Evans" January 14,1992 (57 EB 1491) DOT gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Com-Pak Engineering. Inc.. and Eugene Evans, lodged with the U. S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Comments will be accepted until February 14,1992. "Dupont Withdraws Its Request for Reissuance of a No Migration Petition" January 21,1992 (57 FR 2274) EPA gave notice that Dupont has withdrawn a "no migration" exemption reissuance request it submitted to EPA Region 5. "Extension of Part A Expiration Date" January 28,1992 (57 FB 3202) OMB extended the RCRA Hazardous Waste Permit Application Part A until March 31,1992. with the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Comments were accepted until February 2, 1992. "Proposed §122(h) Administrative Settlement at Bennington Landfill Site, Bennington, Vermont" January 3, 1992 (57 Ffi 287) EPA proposes to enter into an administrative settlement to address claims and resolve liability for costs incurred by EPA at the Bennington Landfill Site in Bennington, Vermont Comments were accepted until February 3, 1992. "Proposed §122(h) Administrative Settlement at Great Northern Nekoosa Corporation in East Millinocket, Maine" January 3, 1 992 (57 EB 288) EPA proposes to enter into an administrative settlement to address claims and resolve liability for costs incurred by EPA at the Great Northern Nekoosa Corporation, in East Millinocket, Maine. Comments were accepted until February 3, 1992. "United States v. Accurate Partitions, et al." January 9, 1 992 (57 EB 925) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Accurate Partitions, et al.. lodged with the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Comments were accepted until February 9, 1992. Copies of RCRA Federal Registers are available through the Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at 1-800-424-9346. ------- January 1992 Federal Registers NOTICES "United States v. Asarco Inc." January 9,1992 (57 FR 925) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in T Iniyri Sffites v. Asarco Inc.. lodged with the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Comments were accepted until February 9,1992. "United States v. Kowinsky Farms. Inc.. et §1." January 14,1992 (57 Ffi1492) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United Spates v. Kowinsky Farms. Inc. et al. lodged in the U. S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Comments will be accepted until February 14,1992. "Extension of Comment Period for 38 Hazardous Substances" January 15,1992 (57 FR 1476) The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) gives notice of an extension to the public comment period for the priority data needs for 38 priority hazardous substances. Comments will be accepted until March 2,1992. "United States v. Endicott Johnson Corporation: The Village of Endicott. New York: The Town of Union. New York: and George Industries. Inc." January 15,1992 (57 FR 1759) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Endicott Johnson Corporation: The Village of Endicott. New York: The Town of Union. New York: and George Industries. Inc.. lodged in the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. Comments were accepted until February 15,1992. United States v. Grant Gear Works. Inc.. et g|." January 15, 1992 (57 EB 1759) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree States v. Grant Gear Works. Inc..et al.. lodged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Comments were accepted until February 15, 1992. "National Priorities List Update" January 16, 1992 (57 EB 1872) EPA recategorized 13 Superfund sites on the National Priorities List. The effective date was January 16, 1992. "Hazard Ranking System Information Collection Request" January 17, 1992 (57 EB 2091) This Information Collection Request (ICR) requests renewal of a currently approved collection for states to apply the HRS by identifying and classifying those releases that warrant further investigation. "Bioremediation Research Review Subcommittee Meeting" January 17, 1 992 (57 EB 2093) The Science Advisory Board's Bioremediation Review Subcommittee of the Environmental Engineering Committee will meet on February 10 and 11, 1992. ------- Federal Registers January 1992 NOTICES "United States v.( Corporation,. et al." January 22, 1992 (57 EB 2577) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in Uniter v- Cumberland Interor Corporation, et al.. lodged with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Comments were accepted until February 23, 1992. "Proposed §122(h) Administrative Settlement at Lee Farm Site in 8L Croix County, Wisconsin" January 23, 1992 (57 EB 2743) EPA requests public comment on a proposed administrative settlement at Lee Farni Site in SL Croix County, Wisconsin. Comments were accepted until February 24, 1992. "United States of America v. Allied Signal Inc.. etal." January 24, 1 992 (57 EB 2929) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States of America v. Allied Signal Inc.. et aL lodged with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. Comments were accepted until February 24, 1992. "United Stales, et al. v. Montrose Chemical Corporation of California, et al." January 24, 1992 (57 EB 2930) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States, et aj. v. Montrose Chemical Corporation Of California, et al. lodged with the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Comments were accepted until February 24, 1992. "Consent Decree Entered for Resolve Manufacturing, Inc. Site, New York" January 27,1992 (57 EB 3055) EPA entered a Consent Decree with five potentially responsible parties for oversight, enforcement and indirect costs in connection with the Resolve Manufacturing, Inc. Site located in Falconer, New York The Consent Decree was entered by the United States District Court, Western District of New York, on October 31,1991. EPCRA "Cancellation of the Two Registrations of Products Containing Sodium Arsenite" January 13,1992 (57 EB 1262) On June 19,1991, EPA announced receipt of a request for voluntary cancellation from the sole registrant of products containing sodium arsenite. EPA allowed 90 days to transfer the registrations to them or allow the registrant to withdraw the request Final orders of cancellation have been issued and were effective as of January 13,1992. "Notice of Conferences" January 22,1992 (57 FR2 2550) EPA will hold a series of three-day train-the- trainer workshps on §313 of die Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act reporting requirements. The original dates for these conferences, as listed in the Federal Register, have been postponed in order that the workshops coincide with the release of the pending new regulation. ------- CALL ANALYSES CALLS ANSWERED BY HOTLINE Janauary Daily Volume* 700 T 600 -• 500 -• i. 400 •• 300 -• 200 -- 100 9 RCRA/SF/OUST" -.VvA 111.5341 Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 Grand Total 15.117 * All calls answered by the Call Management System ** Upward trend on RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline due to a petition filed by EPA on January 21 for a rehearing on the remand of the "mixture" and "derived from" rules. ------- Call Analyses January 1992 CALLS ANSWERED BY TYPE January Daily Volume* 800 j 700 -• 600 -• 500 -• 400 + Questions' 11.9301 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 Grand Total 17.711 * All calls answered by the Call Management System. A single call may result in multiple questions combined with document requests and referrals. ** Upward trend in questions due to a petition filed by EPA on January 21 for a rehearing on the remand of the "mixture" and "derived from" rules. 10 ------- January 1992 Call Analyses CALLS ANSWERED BY PROGRAM AREA January 1992* * Based on 16,206 questions posed and excludes 1,505 referrals made from both Hotlines 11 ------- Call Analyses January 1992 CALLER PROFILE RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline Regulated Community 8,083 Citizens 813 State & Local Gov't/Native American 321 Federal Agencies 245 Educational Institutions 170 EPA 183 Other 85 Media 51 Interest Groups 104 Congress 0 Referrals 1,109 International 25 TOTAL 11,189 State/Local Gov'f Native American 3% Federal Agencies 2% Citizens 8% Regulated Community 80% 12 ------- January 1992 Call Analyses Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Hotline Manufacturer Food/Tobacco 84 Textiles 26 Apparel 6 Lumber & Wood 15 Furniture 23 Paper 38 Printing & Publishing 54 Chemicals 453 Petroleum & Coal 81 Rubber and Plastics 69 Leather 5 Stone, Clay & Glass 26 Primary Metals 99 Fabricated Metals 133 Machinery (Excluding Electrical) 49 Electrical&Electronic Equipment 91 Transportation Equipment 54 Instruments 19 Misc. Manufacturing 69 Not Able to Determine 51 Subtotal 1,445 Consultants/Engineers Attorneys Citizens All Others Trade Associations Public Interest Groups Universities/Academia Insurance Companies Hospitals State Agencies/SERC Fire Departments EPA Local Officials LEPC Farmers Federal Agencies Media/Press Union/Labor Distributors Indians Laboratories Misc. Referrals International TOTAL 671 172 207 24 33 90 0 28 106 17 57 47 41 0 38 21 1 70 0 33 204 396 4 3,705 Citizens 6% Attorneys 5% Consultants/ Engineers 20% All Others 25% 13 ------- Call Analyses January 1992 HOTLINE TOPICS RCRA General/Misc. Special Wastes Ash Bevffl Medical Oil and Gas Subtitle C Wastes Hazardous Waste Identification General Toxicity Characteristic Wood Preserving Used Oil Fluff Mixed Waste Delisting & Petitions Hazardous Waste Recycling Generators Small Quantity Generators Transporters Treatment, Storage & Disposal Facilities General Facility Standards Siting Capacity Treatment Burning Storage Disposal Land Disposal Restrictions Permits & Interim Status Corrective Action Financial Assurance Liability/Enforcement Test Methods Health Effects Pollution Prevention/Waste Min. State Programs Hazardous Waste Data Subtitle D Wastes Household Hazardous Waste Subtitle D Facilities General Facility Standards Siting Combustion Industrial Wastes Composting Source Reduction Grants & Financing Procurement General 788* 0 39 142 1 2,063** 288 38 129 0 44 31 182 468* 163 64 297 2 3 156 140 102 90 464* 154 196 0 82 119 0 72 72 13 71 171 5 2 5 8 2 1 0 Building Insulation 1 Cement & Products with Fly Ash 1 Paper & Paper Products 2 Re-refined Lubricating Oil 0 Retread Tires 0 Solid Waste Recycling General 246 Aluminum 6 Batteries 7 Glass 14 Paper 9 Plastics 19 Tires 33 Used Oil 162 Markets General 71 Aluminum 0 Batteries 0 Compost 2 Glass 3 Paper 3 Plastics 18 Tires 43 Used Oil 7 Document Requests 2,091 TOTAL 9,564 SUPERFUND General/Misc. 87 Access & Information Gathering 65 Administrative Record 5 Allocations from Fund 5 ARARs 33 CERCLIS 113* Citizen Suits 10 Clean-Up Costs 21 Clean-Up Standards 30 Community Relations 11 Contract Lab Program (CLP) 29 Contractor Indemnification 7 Contracts 10 Definitions 33 Emergency Response 3 Enforcement 15 Exposure Assess./Risk Assess. 25 Federal Facilities 17 Fund Balancing 5 Grants 3 14 * Hot topics for this month. ** Includes 732 questions on the "mixture" and "derived from" rules. 1 Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in multiple questions. ------- January 1992 Call Analyses Hazardous Substances 80 Health/Toxics 19 HRS 36 Liability 77 Mandatory Schedules 0 Natural Resource Damages 5 NBARs 6 NCP 31 Notification 55 NPL 118* Off Site Policy 9 On Site Policy 9 OSHA 5 PA/SI 16 PRPs 34 Public Participation 0 RCRA Interface 15 RD/RA 12 Remedial 41 Removal 34 Response 10 RI/FS 33 ROD 23 RQ 136* SARA Interface 8 Settlements 33 SITE Program 24 State Participation 5 State Program 5 Taxes 6 Title ID/Right-to-Know 53 Document Requests 600 TOTAL 2,065 OUST General/Misc. 89 Applicability/Definitions 60 Regulated Substances 16 Standards for New Tank Systems 9 Tank Standards and Upgrading 14 Operating Requirements 9 Release Detection 30 Release Reporting & Investigation 9 Corrective Action for USTs 73 Out-of-Service/Closure 38 Financial Responsibility 114 State Programs 16 Liability/Enforcement 12 LUST Trust Fund 1 Document Requests 150 TOTAL 640 EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW Tide ffl General 172 §301-3 Emergency Planning General 79 SERCs/LEPC 19 Notification 23 Mixtures 14 Extremely Hazardous Substances 43 Delisting EHS 7 Exemptions 10 §304: General 73 Notification Requirements 27 Reportable Quantities 39 RQsvs.TPQs 11 Transportation 6 Exemptions 15 §311/312: General 294* MSDS Reporting Requirements 73 Tier I/H Regulations 260* Thresholds 142* OSHA Expansion 13 Hazard Categories 28 Mixtures 38 Exemptions 87 §313: General 373* Form R 197 Thresholds 81 Phase I 41 Phase n 48 Phase m 0 Pollution Prevention 86* NONs/NOTEs 290* Petitions 36 Health Effects 5 Database 38 Exemptions 52 Training: General 5 §305 Training Grants 0 §305 Emergency Systems Review 0 § 126 (SARA) Training Regulations 0 * Hot topics for this month. • Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in multiple, questions. 15 ------- Call Analyses January 1992 General: CEPP Interim Guide Chemical Profile NRT-1 Hazard Analysis Risk Communication Title m Workshops Information Management Prevention ARIP Other 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 Trade Secrets Enforcement Liability Document Requests TOTAL 5 6 4 1,167 3,937 TOTAL HOTLINE QUESTIONS, DOCUMENT REQUESTS AND REFERRALS: 17,711 16 • Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in multiple questions. ------- LIST OF ADDRESSEES: EdAbrams,OS-332 Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7 Kate Anderson, OS-520 Irene Atney-Yurdin, DOE-NY Beth Behrens, EPA-NEIC Kathy Bishop, OS-210 John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho Susan Bromm, OS-500 RickBrandes,OS-330 Karen Brown, A-149C Nancy Browne, OS-520 Kathy Bruneske, OS-305 Karen Burgan, OS-110 Heather Bums, Hotline Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2 Sabrina Callihan, DOE Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1 Sonia Chambers, EPA-Reg. 5 Richard Clarizio, EPA-Reg. 5 Don R. Clay, OS-100 Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9 Bill Cosgrove, EPA-Reg. 4 Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama Becky Cuthbertson, OS-332 Elaine Davies, OS-100 Jeffery Denit, OS-300 Lynn DePont, OS-305 Director, RED, LE-134S Dave Eberly, OS-343 Chris Elias, C A Dept of Health Terry Escarda, CA Dept. of Health Lisa Friedman, LE-132S John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn. Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX Alan Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR Kristin Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8 John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2 Cheryl Graham, LE-132S Betty Hollowell, DOE-TX Hinton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5 Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4 Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10 Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7 Kathy Jones, OS-210 Gary Jonesi, LE-134S Ron Josephson, OS-333 TonyJover,OS-120 Robert Kayser, OS-333 Mitch Kidwell, OS-332 Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA Jerry Killiane, GAO WiUiam Kline, OS-322W Robert Knox, OS-130 Dan Kovacks, Hotline Walter Kovalick, OS-110 Henry Longest, OS-100 JimLoomis, FLERC Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300 Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5 James Makris, OS-120 Andrea McLaughlin, OS-220W Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7 Dorothy McManus, OS-120 Tami McNamara, TS-779 Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3 Margaret Mereas, EPA-Reg. 4 Charlotte Mooney, OS-332 Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7 Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6 Susan O*Keefe,LE-134S ChaePak, EPA-Reg. 10 Myra Perez, EPA-Houston Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3 Dan Powell, OS-HOW Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9 CarlReeverts,WH-550E John Riley, OS-210 Barbara Roth, OS-305 DaleRuhter,OS-341 Debbie Rutherford, OS-420WF WiUiam Sanjour, OS-330 Sam Sasnett, TS-779 Tim Schoepke, TS-793 Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard Stergios Spanos, NH DES Elaine Stanley, OS-500 Kathie Stein, LE-134S Beverly Thomas, OS-420WF Christine Thomas, Hotline Jim Thompson, OS-520 Linda Thompson, LE-134S Robert Thompson, A-104 Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK Harriett Tregoning, PM-220 Beta' VanEpps, OS-240 David Van Slyke, LE-134S Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8 David Watson, PM-214F Howard Wilson, PM-273 Denise Wright, OS -332 Tish Zimmerman, OS-220 OSW Division Directors OSW Deputy Division Directors OSW Branch Chiefs Hazardous Waste Management Division Directors, Regions I-X Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X Regional Counsel, Regions I-X Regional Libraries, Regions I-X ------- |