PB92-922 408-
MONTHLY HOTLINE RETORT
August 1992
RCRA/SF/OUST and
Emergency Planning and Community RlgHt-
tll v
?.„,.- >-•**
Hotline Questions and Answers
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1
Underground Storage Tanks (UST) 2
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) 3
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act 3
New Publications
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 7
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) 7.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act 1(J
Other Ill
\
Federal Registers
Final Rules 13
Proposed Rules 14
Notices 14
Call Analyses
Calls Answered 19
Caller Profiles 22
Hotline Topics 24
RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline
National Toll Free No.: 800-424-9346
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Hotline
National Toll Free No.: 800-535-0202
This report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039.
EPA Project Officer:
Barbara Roth, (202) 260-2858
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington. DC 20460
Printed on
Recycled Paper
-------
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
RCRA
1. Treatment In a Generator's 90-Day
Containment Building
According to the March 24,1986, Federal
Register, generators may treat hazardous
waste in accumulation tanks or containers in
conformance with the requirements of §26234
and Subparts Jorl of Part 265 without
obtaining a permit or interim status (51 ££.
10168). In the August 18,1992, Federal
Register (57 £fi 37194), EPA promulgated
standards for a new hazardous waste
management unit known as a containment
building (Parts 264 and 265, Subpart DD), and
amended §26234 to allow generators to
accumulate hazardous waste on-site in
containment buildings for 90 days or less
without a permit or interim status
(§26234(a)(iv); 57 £& 37264). May
generators accumulating hazardous waste in
containment buildings in compliance with
§26234 and Part 265, Subpart DD treat the
waste without obtaining a permit or interim
status?
A generator accumulating hazardous waste
in a containment building for less than 90 days
in compliance with §262.34 and Part 265,
Subpart DD (the technical standards for interim
status containment buildings) may treat these
hazardous wastes in the containment building
without obtaining a permit or interim status as
long as thermal treatment is not involved. The
August 18,1992, Federal Register states that
§262.34 has been revised to exempt generators
from permitting requirements when
accumulating or treating hazardous waste on-
site in containment buildings (57 FR 37242
and 37253). Generators who accumulate or
treat hazardous waste in containment buildings
must comply with the general Part 262
regulations, as well as the following
requirements in accordance with
$262.34(a)(lXiv): comply with Subpart DD
of 40 CFR Part 265; place in the facility's
operating record a certification by a
professional engineer that the building
complies with the design standards specified
in 40 CFR §265.1 101; and maintain in the [
facility's files documentation showing no |
hazardous wastes remain in the unit for longer
than 90 days (57 EB. 37264).
If a generator chooses to treat a prohibited
hazardous waste in containment buildings,
however, and is conducting such treatment in
order to meet applicable Part 268, Subpart D
treatment standards, he or she must comply
with the waste analysis plan requirements of
§268.7(a)(4). Section 268.7(a)(4) has been
modified to reflect the addition of containment
buildings to §262.34 as accumulation/
treatment units (57 ER 37270).
Thermal treatment is regulated by the specific
standards for incinerators (Part 265, Subpart
O), boilers and industrial furnaces (Part 266,
Subpart H), and thermal treatment (Pan 265,
Subpart P), and is therefore not eligible for the
§262.34 permit exemption even if the
treatment occurs inside a containment
building.
-------
Hotline Questions and Answers
August 1992
2. Accumulation Time for Hazardous
Waste Importers
A U.S. hazardous waste broker wishes to
import hazardous waste by truck from Mexico
into the United States. Assuming the shipment
passes U.S. Customs, the broker wishes to
accumulate the hazardous waste at a
warehouse near the border for 45 days in
order to consolidate several shipments before
transporting the hazardous waste to a
designated TSDF. According to 40 CFR
§262.60, an importer of hazardous waste must
comply with the generator requirements of 40
CFR Part 262. Section 26220 also requires
the importer to comply with certain
manifesting requirements specific to imports
(§262.60(b)). Once the waste is imported into
the United States, can the importer accumulate
hazardous waste (per §262.34) at or near the
point of entry to the United States (e.g., in a
warehouse) for 90 days or less without a
permit or interim status prior to shipping it to
the designated TSDF?
Although it is correct that importers must
comply with Part 262, Standards Applicable to
Generators, including the special requirements
of Part 262, Subpart F, importers cannot
accumulate hazardous waste under §262.34.
Ninety-day accumulation under §262.34
applies only to generator accumulation on-site,
and is not applicable to this situation. Sections
262.20 and 262.60 require the importer to
prepare a hazardous waste manifest for the
waste shipment, using the importer's name and
the name of the foreign generator in the
generator box. At the time the manifest is
initiated (at the point of entry into the United
States) the waste shipment is already in
transportation, and the manifested hazardous
waste must proceed to the facility designated
on the manifest to accept the hazardous waste.
Under §263.12, the hazardous waste may be
stored during the normal course of
transportation to the designated facility at a
transfer facility for 10 days or less, provided
that the hazardous waste is packaged in
accordance with DOT packaging regulations.
UST
3. Calculating The Inventory Control
Standard
According to 40 CFR Part 280, Subpart D,
new underground storage tank (UST) systems
and existing systems of certain ages must be
fitted with release detection. One of the
options to satisfy this requirement combines
tank-tightness testing at specified periods with
monthly inventory control, which consists of i
reconciling tank measurements against [
delivery and dispensing quantities. Section f
280.43(a) requires that this method detect *
releases of "...at least 1.0 percent of flow-
through plus 130 gallons on a monthly
basis...." How is the 1.0 percent plus 130
gallons of flow-through calculated?
In order to determine whether a release has
been detected, an owner/operator must first
determine the flow-through quantity; in other
words, the amount of regulated substance
moving through the UST system during any
given month. Flow-through may be calculated
using either the amount added to or the
amount dispensed from the tank, as long as the
same measure is used consistently.
After establishing the flow-through
quantity, the owner/operator next computes
1.0 percent of that quantity, and then adds 130
gallons. Written mathematically, the standard
may be expressed as (0.01 x flow-through) +
130 gallons. The owner/operator then
compares the result against the cumulative
overage or shortage for the month to
determine if a leak has been detected. For
-------
August 1992
Hotline Questions and Answers
example, suppose 7,000 gallons of gasoline
are dispensed from an UST during September.
Although 8,000 gallons were delivered during
September, the owner/operator always bases
flow-through on the quantity dispensed;
therefore the flow-through quantity is 7,000
gallons. One percent of 7,000 gallons is 70
gallons, to which 130 gallons are added,
totaling 200 gallons ((0.01 x 7,000) + 130 =
200). The resulting 200 gallons can then be
compared against the cumulative overage or
shortage for the month to determine the
presence of a leak. The margin for error
allowed by §280.43(a) helps reduce the
frequency of false positive results from
temperature variations and measuring
inaccuracies (a detailed discussion can be
found at 53 ER 37157; September 23, 1988).
More information on inventory control is
available in Detecting I^eal^s; Successful
Methods Step Bv Step (U.S. EPA Office of
Underground Storage Tanks, November 1989;
530/UST-89/012).
CERCLA
4. Off-Site Policy and Subtitle D
Regulations
A CERCLA site is undergoing
remediation, which is producing soil and
debris. Analysis of the soil and debris
indicates they do not contain RCRA hazardous
waste (i.e., they are nonhazardous waste).
Due to the conditions at the site, however, the
soil and debris will have to be disposed of off-
site. Is it permissible under the existing
CERCLA off-site policy (OSWER Directive
9843.11, November 13,1987, PB91-139 287)
to dispose of nonhazardous soil and debris
from a CERCLA site at a municipal solid
waste landfill regulated by RCRA Subtitle D?
If nonhazardous waste generated during
remediation of a CERCLA site is not otherwise
regulated (i.e., by the Toxic Substances Control
Act, the Atomic Energy Act, or other
applicable Federal and state laws), a lead
agency can direct this waste to be disposed of
at a Subtitle D municipal solid waste landfill
facility that meets the requirements set by the
November 13,1987, off-site policy. The off-
site policy, promulgated pursuant to CERCLA
§121(d)(3), provides that CERCLA hazardous
substances, pollutants, and contaminants
(CERCLA waste) transferred off-site are sent
only to facilities determined to be
environmentally sound.
j
To meet the objectives of the off-site
policy, the lead agency must make a
determination about the acceptability of the
facility that is to receive the CERCLA waste
To be considered acceptable to receive k
CERCLA waste under the off-site policy, a
Subtitle D facility must be in compliance with
all applicable Federal or state regulations, and
all environmentally significant releases from
the Subtitle D facility must be controlled by a
corrective action program under the applicable
Federal or state authority. To ensure
compliance with these standards, facilities
designated to receive CERCLA wastes must be
inspected by the appropriate regulatory agency
prior to the planned receipt of CERCLA waste.
Information about the acceptability of a
particular facility to receive CERCLA waste
may be obtained by calling the Regional Off-
Site Coordinator (ROC) of the Region in which
the facility is located.
The regulatory authority for municipal
solid waste landfills rests primarily with state
and local governments. In October 1991, EPA
promulgated a rule requiring owners and
operators of Subtitle D municipal solid waste
landfills to comply with a comprehensive set of
Federal minimum standards (56 FR 50978;
-------
Hotline Questions and Answers
August 1992
October 9,1991). Owners and operators must
comply with these new requirements by
October 9,1993. These regulations, which
include location restrictions, facility design and
operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and
corrective action requirements, financial
assurance requirements, and closure and post-
closure care requirements, are codified at 40
CFR Part 258.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
5. Recycle/Reuse Activity Under §313
Refractory bricks containing 12,000 pounds
of lead are installed in a reaction vessel. Is the
lead in the bricks considered "otherwise used"
for purposes of §313 of the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act? Also, are
releases of lead from the bricks during
reporting year 1991 subject to release reporting
on the Form R (40 CFR Part 372) if no new
bricks are added during the calendar year?
The lead contained in the bricks is
considered "otherwise used" since it is not
incorporated into the final product The facility
would count the amount of lead in the bricks
that are added to the reaction vessel only for the
year in which the bricks are installed. In answer
to the second question, if the 10,000-pound
threshold is exceeded, then all releases of lead
would be reported. Neither the lead contained
in the refractory bricks in the inventory (i.e., not
yet installed), nor in-place lead contained in
bricks (i.e., installed in a previous year) are to
be included in threshold determination for the
reporting year hi question. If no bricks are
installed during the calendar year, then a report
would not be required
6. Activity Indices and Production
Ratios
For the purposes of reporting in Section
8.9 of the Form R (40 CFR §372 £5), a facility
must provide a ratio of the reporting year
production to prior year production, or
provide an "activity index" based on a variable
other than production that is the primary
influence on the quantity of the reported toxic
chemical recycled, used for energy recovery,
treated, or disposed of. How should one-time
or batch processors determine an activity
index or production ratio for reporting in
Section 8.9 of the Form R?
A one-time processor in its first year of
using a toxic chemical should report "NA" ink
Section 8.9 of the Form R. If a one-time [
processor uses a toxic chemical on a yearly
basis but in different products, applications,
and quantities, then a production ratio based on
production or application involving the toxic
chemical should be calculated as follows:
(production involving the toxic chemical in the
current year + production involving the toxic
chemical in the prior year).
Batch processors should calculate a ratio
based on campaigns involving the toxic
chemical from year to year as follows:
(campaign production in the current year+
campaign production in the prior year).
7. Reporting on Polymeric Lead
Compounds
A polymeric lead compound is processed at a
facility in excess of the 25,000-pound threshold
during the reporting year. Is a polymer that
contains lead as a pan of its infrastructure
considered to be a lead compound under §313
of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act?
-------
August 1992 Hotline Questions and Answers
The polymer would be considered to be a
lead compound. According to Directive 4 on
compounds and mixtures in the Toxic
Chemical Release Inventory Reporting
Package for 1990, a compound is any
combination of two or more chemicals where
the result is (in whole or in part) a product of a
chemical reaction. In the formation of a
compound, the reactant chemicals lose their
individual chemical identities. Polymers
formed as nonreversible reaction products are
an example of a compound. Since this
polymer is a compound, under §313 (40 CFR
§372.22(h)), a polymeric lead compound
processed at a facility would count toward the
threshold determination for lead compounds.
-------
-------
NEW PUBLICATIONS
HOW TO ORDER
NTIS Publication* are available by calling (703) 487-4650, or writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
VA 22161. Be sure to include the NTIS Order Number listed under the document.
Hotline Publications are available through the RCRA/Superfund/OUST Hotline by calling a Document
Specialist at 1-800-424-9346. Be sure to include the EPA Order Number (if any) listed under the document.
RCRA
TITLE: "Environmental Fact Sheet:
Management Standards Issued to Control
Potential Risks from Recycled Used Oil -- No
Hazardous Waste Listing"
AVAILABILITY: Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: 530-F-92-018
On August 8,1992, EPA issued management
standards for recycled used oil that protect
human health and the environment while
promoting reuse of this valuable commodity.
These management standards provide strong
safeguards against potential types of
mishandling and unsafe practices associated
with improper storage of used oil, road oil, and
contamination of used oil from hazardous waste.
TITLE: "Environmental Fact Sheet: Coke
Listing Determination Made Final"
AVAILABILITY: Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: 530-F-92-021
On August 8,1992, EPA published final
regulations that list as hazardous seven wastes
from the coke by-products industry. Five of
these wastes are generated at coke plants during
the production, recovery, and refining of coke
by-products produced from coal. The other two
are generated at tar refining facilities.
CERCLA
TITLE: "Superfund Removal Procedures
Public Participation Guidance for On-Scene
Coordinators: Community Relations and the l
Administrative Record" I
AVAILABILITY: NTIS '
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963416 *
This document is part of a 10-volume series of
guidance documents collectively titled the
Superfund Removal Procedures. Each volume
in the series is dedicated to a particular aspect
of the removal process. This document
summarizes the relevant public participation
guidance, and statutory authorities for
conducting community relations and
administrative record activities.
TITLE: "Contracting and Subcontracting
Guide to the Superfund Program"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB89-233 431
This document assists those interested in
providing contractual services to the
Superfund program, describes current
Superfund contracts, and provides contact
points, addresses, and telephone numbers of
firms with Superfund contracts.
-------
August 1992
New Publications
TITLE: "Superfund Removal Procedures -
Removal Enforcement Guidance for Qn-Scene
Coordinators"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 409
This document is part of a 10-volume series of
guidance documents collectively titled the
Superfund Removal Procedures. Each volume
in the series is dedicated to a particular aspect
of the removal process. This document
summarizes the relevant guidance and statutory
authorities for conducting enforcement
activities during removal actions.
TITLE: "Policy Towards Owners of
Residential Property at Superfund Sites"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 615
This document summarizes EPA's policy
toward owners of residential property at
Superfund sites. This policy addresses
concerns raised by owners of residential
property located on Superfund sites and
provides Regions with a nationally consistent
approach on this issue. The guidance sets forth
in writing what has been the Agency's past
practice toward owners of residential property
located on Superfund sites.
TITLE: "Standard Operating Safety Guides"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 414
This document provides information on health
and safety, and is intended to complement
professional judgment and experience and to
supplement existing Regional office safety
procedures. It provides guidance for ensuring
the health and safety of site personnel who
work with hazardous substances or who work
at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. This
guidance is intended for Federal, state, and
local managers and personnel at sites where
hazardous materials are present. The
Operating Safety Guides is intended to provide
a comprehensive overview of the information
needed by employers to meet their
responsibility to ensure the health and safety of
employees engaged in operations at hazardous
waste sites.
TITLE: "Compendium of ERT Field
Analytical Procedures"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963405
This document provides standard operating
procedures for field analytical procedures,
including the use of equipment such as the
Sentex Scentograph Gas Chromatograph;
Portable XRF Analyzer, Pohotoionization
Detector - HNU; Photovac 10A10 Portable
Gas Chromatograph Operation; Photovac GC
Analysis for Air, Soil Gas, Water, and Soil; ar
Micromonitor M200.
TITLE: "Compendium of ERT Air Sampling
Procedures"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963406
This document provides guidelines for ERT air
sampling procedures, including SUMMA
Canister Cleaning, SUMMA Canister
Sampling, GC/MS Analysis of Tenax/CMS
Cartridges and SUMMA Canisters, Preparation
of SUMMA Canister Field Standards, Low
Level Methane Analysis for SUMMA Canister
Gas Samples, Asbestos Sampling, Tedlar Bag
Sampling, Charcol Tube Sampling, Tenax Tube
Sampling, and Polyurethane Foam Sampling.
-------
New Publications
August 1992
TITLE: "Superfund at Work: Hazardous
Waste Cleanup Efforts Nationwide (Bog
Creek Farm)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 612
This "Superfund at Work" bulletin series
profiles hazardous waste cleanup efforts
nationwide. This issue profiles the Bog Creek
Farm site, a chicken farm in Howell
Township, New Jersey, where chemical
solvents and other wastes were dumped
between 1973 and 1974.
TITLE: "Superfund at Work: Hazardous
Waste Cleanup Efforts Nationwide (White
Chemical)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963611
This "Superfund at Work" bulletin series
profiles hazardous waste cleanup efforts
nationwide. This issue profiles the White
Chemical Site, a former chemical processing
facility in Newark, New Jersey, where 11,000
drums of hazardous waste and chemical
contaminants were stored from 1984 and
1989.
TITLE: "Guidance for Data Useability in
Risk Assessment (Part A)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 356
This document is the first part (Part A) of the
two-part Guidance for Data Useability in Risk
Assessment. This guidance provides direction
for planning and assessing analytical data
collection activities for the baseline human
health risk assessment, conducted as part of
the remedial investigation (RI) process. It
provides risk assessors and Regional Project
Managers (RPMs) with nationally consistent
procedures to plan and assess sampling and
analysis of useable environmental data.
Although the guidance addresses the baseline
assessment within the RI, it is appropriate for
use in the new Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model where data needs for risk assessment are
considered at the onset of site evaluation.
TITLE: Brochure: "RCRA/Superfund/OUST
Hotline"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PR-912 Free Document
The RCRA/Superfund/OUST Hotline provides
quick response to regulatory and related
questions concerning waste management and.
disposal. This pamphlet provides a brief
overview of services provided by the RCRA/
Superfund/OUST Hotline.
TITLE: Brochure: "Environmental [
Emergencies: What to Do" *
AVAILABILITY: NTIS I
NTIS ORDER NO.: PR-913 Free Document
This pamphlet provides information to the
public about reporting hazardous materials
releases and spills to the National Response
Center.
TITLE: "Health Effects Assessment Summary
Tables, Annual FY 1992"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-921 199
This document identifies current literature on
changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals. The tables in this document
summarize reference doses (RFDs) for toxicity
from subchronic and chronic inhalation and
from oral exposure, slope factors, and unit risk
values.
-------
August 1992
New Publications
TITLE: "Regional Pilots and Applications of
the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963273
This fact sheet describes the regional pilot
programs testing the application of the
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, and
describes the major categories of pilots and the
overall status of the programs.
TITLE: "Guidance for Data Useability in
Risk Assessment"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 363
This fact sheet provides an overview of Part A
and Part B of the Guidance for Data Useability
in Risk Assessment. It highlights key points of
the documents and states where additional
information can be found. The Guidance for
Data Useability in Risk Assessment provides
risk assessors and Remedial Project Managers
(PRMs) with nationally consistent procedures
to plan and assess sampling and analysis of
useable environmental data for baseline human
health risk assessments, and addresses the
useability of radioanalytical data for baseline
human health risk assessment.
TITLE: "Remedial Action Report
Documentation for Operable Unit Completion"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 364
The progress in moving a site toward the
ultimate goal of deletion from the National
Priorities List (NPL) typically involves several
operable units or multiple phases of
construction over a period of several years.
The purpose of the Remedial Action Report is
to document the activities that occur at each
specific remedial action operable unit at a site.
This report describes documentation that a
particular operable unit has met its objectives
as well as summary information for subsequent
inclusion in the Superfund site close-out
report. The report also serves as a source of
lessons learned for project managers and
designers of future remedial action projects.
TITLE: "Corrective Action Glossary"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB92-963 614
This glossary of technical terms was prepared
to facilitate the use of the Corrective Action
Plan (CAP) issued by OSWER on November
14,1986. The CAP presents model scopes of
work for all phases of a corrective action
program, including the RCRA Facility t
Investigation (RFI), Corrective Measures [
Study (CMS), Corrective Measures ?
Implementation (CMI), and interim measures.*
The Corrective Action Glossary includes brief
definitions of the technical terms used in the
CAP and explains how they are used. In
addition, expected ranges (where applicable)
are provided. Parameters or terms not
discussed in the CAP, but commonly
associated with site investigations or
remediations, are also included.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
TITLE: "The Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act Section 313
Enforcement Response Policy"
AVAILABILITY: SARA Title m Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: N/A
This new enforcement policy clarifies the
regulations outlined in 40 CFR §372.18 and
revises the Enforcement Response Policy for
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act of December
1988.
10
-------
New Publications
August 1992
OTHER
TITLE: "Monthly Hotline Report"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: See below
Yearly Subscription PB92-922 400
530-R-92-014
January 1992
February 1992
March 1992
April 1992
May 1992
June 1992
July 1992
August 1992
PB92-922 401
530-R-92-014a
PB92-922 402
530-R-92-014b
PB92-922 403
530-R-92-014c
PB92-922 404
530-R-92-014d
PB92-922 405
530-R-92-014e
PB92-922 406
530-R-92-014f
PB92-922 407
530-R-92-014g
PB92-922 408
530-R-92-014h
The reports contain questions that required
EPA resolution or were frequently asked,
publications availability, Federal Register
summaries, and Hotline call statistics.
11
-------
-------
FEDERAL REGISTERS
FINAL RULES
RCRA
"Louisiana: Final Approval of State
Underground Storage Tank Program"
August 5,1992 (57 EH 34519)
EPA granted final approval to the State of
Louisiana to operate its underground storage
tank (UST) program. This final approval will
be effective on September 4,1992.
"Land Disposal Restrictions for Newly
Listed Waste and Hazardous Debris"
August 18,1992 (57 EB 37194)
EPA promulgated final treatment standards
for certain hazardous wastes listed after
November 8,1984. EPA also finalized
treatment standards for debris contaminated
with listed hazardous waste and debris which
exhibits certain hazardous waste
characteristics. The majority of the
requirements in this final rule are effective
June 30,1992.
"Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste: Coke By-Product
Wastes"
August 18,1992 (57 EH 37284)
This final rule listed as hazardous seven
wastes generated during the production,
recovery, and refining of coke by-products
produced from coal. This rule will become
effective on February 18,1993.
"Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste: Final Exclusion"
August 21,1992 (57 EB 37884)
EPA granted a final exclusion from the lists
of hazardous wastes for certain solid wastes
generated at Care Free Aluminum Products,
Inc., in Charlotte, Michigan. This final rule is
effective August 21,1992.
"Identification and Listing of t
Hazardous Waste: Final Exclusion" [
August 21,1992 (57 EH 37886) !
EPA granted a final exclusion from the lists
of hazardous wastes for certain solid wastes
generated at MAHLE, Incorporated, in
Morristown, Tennessee. This final rule is
effective August 21,1992.
"Burning of Hazardous Waste in
Boilers and Industrial Furnaces;
Technical Corrections"
August 25,1992 (57 EH 38558)
This final rule made several technical
clarification amendments and corrections to
the final rule for boilers and industrial
furnaces burning hazardous waste which was
published on February 21,1991 (56 ER 7134).
It is effective August 11,1992.
Copies of RCRA Federal Registers are available through the Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at
1-800-424-9346.
13
-------
Federal Registers
August 1992
PROPOSED RULES
RCRA
"Land Disposal Restrictions 'No
Migration' Variances"
August 11,1992 (57 EB 35940)
This rule proposes EPA's interpretation of
the "no migration" variance to the
Congressionally mandated restrictions on land
disposal of hazardous waste. EPA also
proposed new requirements for petitioning
EPA and demonstrating that there will be "no
migration" from a land disposal unit.
Comments on this proposed rule must be
received on or before September 25,1992.
"Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste: Proposed
Exclusion"
August 21,1992 (57 EB 37921)
EPA proposed to grant a petition submitted
by POP Fasteners of Shelton, Connecticut, to
exclude certain solid wastes generated at its
facility from the lists of hazardous wastes.
Comments will be accepted until October 5,
1992.
"Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste: Proposed
Exclusion"
August 21,1992 (57 EB 37927)
EPA proposed to grant a petition to exclude
from the lists of hazardous wastes certain solid
wastes generated by Ampex Recording Media
Corporation at its facility in Opelika,
Alabama. Comments will be accepted until
October 5,1992.
"Deferral of UST Petroleum-
Contaminated Media and Debris"
August 14,1992 (57 EB 36866)
EPA published a notice describing several
studies completed concerning the temporary
deferral from the hazardous waste Toxicity
Characteristic rule of petroleum-contaminated
media and debris from underground storage
tanks. Comments on these studies must be
submitted on or before September 28,1992.
CERCLA
"Recovery of Costs for CERCLA
Response Actions"
August 6,1992 (57 EB 34742)
This proposed rule is intended to clarify |
certain aspects of the CERCLA cost recovery^
process and thereby avoid unnecessary costs
and delays involved in that process.
Comments must be received on or before
October 5,1992.
NOTICES
RCRA
"Availability of Document: Lead and
Cadmium Substitutes"
August 5,1992 (57 EB 34566)
EPA announced the availability of a report
entitled Preliminary Use and Substitutes
Analysis for Lead and Cadmium in Products
in Municipal Solid Waste. This report
identifies lead- and cadmium-containing
products in municipal solid waste and
provides information on substitutes.
Copies of RCRA Federal Registers are available through the Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at
1-800-424-9346.
14
-------
Federal Registers
August 1992
NOTICES
'Memorandum of Understanding for an "Proposed Administrative Settlement
Environmentally Sound for U.K. Drum Site, New London,
Transportation System" Wisconsin"
August 5,1992 (57 Efi 34606) August 5,1992 (57 Efi 34567)
This notice announced that a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) was signed by the
Federal Highway Administration and EPA to
increase cooperation in a number of high-
priority areas for an environmentally sound
transportation system in the United States.
This MOU was signed on April 22,1992.
"Virginia: Adequacy Determination of
the State's Municipal Solid Waste
Permit Program"
August 18,1992 (57 Efi 37160)
EPA tentatively determined that Virginia's
municipal solid waste permit program is
adequate to ensure compliance with Federal
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Criteria. All
comments must be received by EPA Region HI
by October 14,1992.
CERCLA
"Proposed Settlement for National
Gypsum and Aancor Holdings, Inc."
August 3,1992 (57 £B 34149)
This notice announced a proposed settlement
agreement settling the United States claims
against National Gypsum and Aancor
Holdings, Inc., for six CERCLA sites.
Comments must be submitted by September 2,
1992.
This notice announced a proposed
administrative settlement concerning the J.K.
Drum Site in New London, Wisconsin.
Comments must be submitted by September 4,
1992.
"Announcement of Funds for
Evaluating Exposures at Department
of Energy (DOE) Sites"
August 5,1992 (57 Efi 34570)
The Agency for Toxic Substances and |
Disease Registry (ATSDR) announced the j.
availability of funds to develop a research
program for the purpose of evaluating
exposure at DOE sites. This program is
authorized by §§104(i)(5), (9), and (15) of
CERCLA. The application must be submitted
on or before September 1,1992.
"Proposed Administrative Settlement
for Organic Chemicals, Inc., Site,
Grandville, Michigan"
August 11,1992 (57 F_B 35824)
This notice announced a proposed d£
minimis settlement concerning the Organic
Chemicals, Inc., Site in Grandville, Michigan.
Comments must be submitted on or before
September 10,1992.
Copies ofRCRA Federal Registers are available through the Hotline by calling a Document Specialist at
1-800-424-9346.
15
-------
August 1992
Federal Registers
NOTICES
"Document Availability: CERCLA;
Reimbursement Petitions"
August 13, 1992 (57 EB 36402)
EPA announced the availability of a document
titled Reimbursement Petitions and
on EPA Review of Those Petitions. This
document clarifies the reimbursement process.
"Proposed Consent Decree for the Signo
Trading Site"
August 18, 1992 (57 EB 37171)
A proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
Jack Colbert, et al.. was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New
York on August 13, 1992. The proposed
Consent Decree requires the settling defendants
pay $71,000 in settlement of U.S. claims for
response costs incurred by EPA at the Signo
Trading Site. Comments must be received by
September 17, 1992.
"Public Health Assessment Response
Procedures and Decision Criteria"
August 18, 1992 (57 EH 37382)
This notice describes the interim procedures
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) will use to respond to
requests for public health assessments. ATSDR
is required under §104(i)(6)(A) of CERCLA to
perform public health assessments of sites listed
on the National Priorities List Comments must
be received on or before October 19, 1992.
"Proposed Consent Decree for the
McAdoo Associates Site"
August 19,1992 (57 EB 37556)
A proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
Alcan Aluminum Co.. et al.. was lodged with the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania on August 10,1992. The Consent
Decree requires four defendants to turn over to
EPA $2 million (plus accrued interest) placed in
escrow in 1991. Comments must be received by
September 18,1992.
"Proposed Consent Decree for the John
Deere-Ottumwa Works Site"
August 20,1992 (57 £B 37838) ,
On August 11,1992, a proposed Consent f
Decree in United States v. Deere and Compzbw.
etal.. was lodged with the U.S. District Court for
the Central Division of the Southern District of
Iowa. The Consent Decree requires the
defendants to file deed restrictions limiting use
of the John Deere-Ottumwa Works Site, as well
as reimburse the United States for costs incurred
at the site. Comments will be accepted until
September 19,1992.
"Proposed Consent Decree for the Dover
Municipal Landfill Site"
August 20,1992 (57 EB 37838)
A proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
City of Dover, et al ..was lodged on August 7,
1992, with the U.S. District Court for the District
of New Hampshire. This Consent Decree
requires the settling defendants to pay response
costs to EPA and the state. Comments must be
submitted by September 19,1992.
16
-------
Federal Registers
August 1992
NOTICES
"Proposed Consent Decree for the
Stringfellow Site"
August 20,1992 (57 EB 37838)
A proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
J.B. Stringfellow. Jr. et al.. was lodged with the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California on July 30,1992. This Consent
Decree requires Alcan Aluminum Corporation to
pay all costs incurred by the United States in
connection with the operation of the Mid-Canyon
Pretreatment Plant at the Stringfellow Superfund
Site. Comments must be submitted by September
19,1992.
"Proposed Consent Decree for the
Stringfellow Site"
August 20,1992 (57 £H 37839)
A proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
J.B. Stringfellow. Jr. et al.. was lodged with the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California on July 30,1992. This Consent Decree
requires, among other things, that certain
defendants reimburse the United States for more
than $80 million in costs expended in connection
with the Stringfellow Superfund Site. Comments
must be submitted by September 19,1992.
"Proposed Settlement Agreement for
20 Superfund Sites"
August 20,1992 (57 EB 37839)
A group of debtors agreed to an allowed
general unsecured claim of $27,775,409 in the
debtor's bankruptcy proceeding for response
costs under CERCLA at 20 Superfund sites.
Comments will be accepted on or before
September 19,1992.
"National Priorities List; Intent to Delete
Binghamton Equipment Company
(BEC) Trucking Site"
August 24,1992 (57 EB 38289)
EPA announced its intent to delete the BEC
Trucking Site from the National Priorities List.
EPA and the State of New York have
determined that no further cleanup by
responsible parties is appropriate under
CERCLA. Comments may be submitted on or
before September 18,1992.
"Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR);
Announcement of Meeting" t
August 27,1992 (57 EB 38839) [
i
ATSDR announced a meeting on
Toxicological Data Quality and the usefulness of
databases. Participants will review and critique
criteria under which reports and studies on
health and environmental effects of chemicals
could be assessed for reliability. The meeting
will be held on September 16-18,1992, in
Atlanta, Georgia.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
"Cooper Phthalocyanine Pigments -
Toxic Chemical Release Reporting;
Community Right-to-Know; Correction"
August 21,1992 (57 EB 37888)
This corrects an error published in the federal
Register of May 23,1991. Three pigments: C.I.
Pigment Blue 15, CAS No. 147-14-8; C.I.
Pigment Green 7, CAS No. 1328-53-6; and C.I.
Pigment Green 36, CAS No. 14302-13-7 were
deleted from the list of toxic chemicals category
"copper compounds." The Water Quality
Criteria for copper was incorrectly listed.
17
-------
CALL ANALYSES
600 -r
200
100 ••
CALLS ANSWERED BY HOTLINE
August Daily Volume*
Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 h
10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21
Year to Date*
24 25 23 27 28 31
RCRA/SF/OUST
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Month
11,534
11,476
12,333
11.082
13,586
11,837
11,049
10,770
Cumulative
23,010
35,343
46,425
60,011
71,848
82,897
93,667
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Month
3,583
4,943
3,159
3,012
4,131
9,505
5,710
6,409
Cumulative
8,526
11,685
14,697
18,828
28,333
34,043
40,452
*A11 calls answered by the Call Management System or the Message Retrieval Line - The message regarded EPA's final rule on
used oil recycling management standards.
19
-------
Call Analyses
August 1992
CALLS ANSWERED BY TYPE
August Daily Volume*
800 -r
700 - .
600 -•
500
400 - •
300 -•
200 -
Documents
>•—"x^ .-^-—-*~.-*"—•«
r^_i i_ *^
' '""""^ I 4,075|
• • ^"
1 1,783 |
10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20
Year to Date*
21 24 25 23 27 28 31
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Questions
Month
11,930
12,338
11,755
10,734
12,885
17,092
13,062
13,884
Cumulative
24,268
36,023
46,757
59,642
76,734
89,796
103,680
Documents
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Month
4,276
3,822
4,152
3,899
5,625
4,802
3,981
4,075
Cumulative
8,098
12,250
16,149
21,774
26,576
30,557
34,632
Referrals
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
Month
1,505
1,831
1,390
1,144
1,396
1,535
1,795
1,783
Cumulative
3,336
4,726
5,870
7,266
8,801
10.596
12,379
* All calls answered by the Call Management System or the Message Retrieval Line. A single call may include multiple
questions combined with document requests and referrals.
20
-------
August 1992
Call Analyses
CALLS ANSWERED BY PROGRAM AREA
August 1992*
'Based on 17,959 requests and excludes 1,783 referrals made from both Hotlines. Includes the Message Retrieval
Linfl Year to Date**
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
RCRA
Month
60%
(9,564)
55%
(8,860)
66%
(10,410)
61%
(8,913)
66%
(12,134)
45%
(9,878)
54%
(9,210)
50%
(8,992)
Cumulative
57%
(18,424)
60%
(28,834)
60%
(37,747)
62%
(49,881)
57%
(59,759)
57%
(68,969)
56%
(77,961)
Superfund
Month
12%
(2,065)
11%
(1,823)
10%
(1,638)
13%
(1,957)
8%
(1.555)
8%
(1,773)
9%
(1,446)
10%
(1,715)
Cumulative
12%
(3,888)
12%
(5,526)
12%
(7.483)
11%
(9,038)
11%
(10,811)
10%
(12,257)
10%
(13,972)
OUST
Month
4%
(640)
3%
(483)
3%
(488)
5%
(665)
3%
(551)
2%
(452)
2%
(383)
3%
(563)
Cumulative
3%
(1,123)
3%
(1,611)
4%
(2,276)
3%
(2,827)
3%
(3,279)
3%
(3,662)
3%
(4,225)
Emergency Planning &
Community Rlght-to-Know
Month
24%
(3,937)
31%
(14,994)
21%
(3,371)
21%
(3,098)
23%
(4,270)
45%
(9,791)
35%
(6,004)
37%
(6,689)
Cumulative
28%
(8,931)
25%
(12,302)
24%
(15,400)
24%
(19,670)
29%
(29,461)
30%
(35,465)
30%
(42,154)
** Based on 120,353 requests and excludes 10,596 referrals made from both Hotlines.
21
-------
Call Analyses
August 1992
CALLER PROFILE
RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline
Regulated Community 7,078
Citizens 699
State & Local Gov't/Native American 262
Federal Agencies 175
Educational Institutions 134
EPA 162
Other 97
Media 15
Interest Groups 101
Congress 46
Referrals 1,413
International 19
Message Retrieval Line* 619
TOTAL
10,770
State/Local Gov't/
Native American
3%
Federal Agencies
2%
All Others
6%
Citizens
8%
Regulated
Community
* No caller profile data available.
22
-------
August 1992
Call Analyses
Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Hotline
Manufacturer
Food/Tobacco 191
Textiles 55
Apparel 18
Lumber & Wood 58
Furniture 91
Paper 99
Printing & Publishing 105
Chemicals 853
Petroleum & Coal 111
Rubber and Plastics 201
Leather 12
Stone, Clay & Glass 120
Primary Metals 219
Fabricated Metals 511
Machinery (Excluding Electrical) 148
Electrical&Electronic Equipment 206
Transportation Equipment 246
Instruments 83
Misc. Manufacturing 149
Not Able to Determine 731
Subtotal 4,207
Consultants/Engineers
Attorneys
Citizens
All Others
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Agencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Distributors
Native Americans
Laboratories
Misc.
Referrals
International
TOTAL
804
173
154
25
21
39
0
19
47
32
34
35
31
0
27
48
1
7
1
58
276
370
0
6,409
All Others
11%
Attorneys Citizens
7% 3%
Consultants/
Engineers
13%
23
-------
Call Analyses
August 1992
HOTLINE TOPICS
RCRA
Special Wastes
Ash 9
Mining Wastes, Bevill 31
Medical Wastes 189*
Oil and Gas 40
Subtitle C Wastes
Hazardous Waste Id. (General) 1,7%*
Toxicity Characteristic 134
Wood Preserving 43
Listing of Used Oil 226*
Fluff 2
Radioactive Mixed Waste 42
Delisting Petitions 24
Hazardous Waste Recycling 198
Generators 454
Small Quantity Generators 115
Transportation/Transporters 80
TSDFs General 190
TSDFs Siting Facilities 16
TSDFs Capacity 11
TSDFs Treatment 74
TSDFs Burning 80
TSDFs Storage 71
TSDFs Disposal 47
Land Disposal Restrictions 701*
Permits and Permitting 140
Corrective Action 162
Financial Liability/Enforcement 77
Test Methods 126
Health Effects 17
Waste Min. Pollution Prevention 45
State Programs 78
Hazardous Waste Data 24
Household Hazardous Waste 170
Subtitle D (General) 161
Siting Facilities 27
Combustion 12
Industrial Waste 15
Composting 19
Source Reduction/Poll. Prev. 13
Grants & Financing 7
Procurement (General) 3
Building Insulation 0
Cement & Products with Fly Ash 3
Paper & Paper Products 0
Re-refined Lubricating Oil 6
Retread Tires 4
Solid Waste Recycling (General) 316*
Aluminum 6
Batteries 20
Glass 9
Paper 13
Plastics 34
Tires 96
Used Oil 918**
Markets (General) 10
Aluminum 2
Batteries 3
Compost 1
Glass 1
Paper 7
Plastics 21
Tires 16
Used Oil 3
RCRA General 1,834*
TOTAL 8,992l
1 Includes 2,358 RCRA document requests.
SUPERFUND
General/Misc. 360
Access & Information Gathering 14
Administrative Record 3
Allocations from Fund 7
ARARs 34
CERCLIS 106
Citizen Suits 3
Clean-Up Costs 22
Clean-Up Standards 24
Community Relations 15
Contract Lab Program (CLP) 16
Contractor Indemnification 9
Contracts 6
Definitions 4
Emergency Response 5
Enforcement 29
Exposure Assess./Risk Assess. 17
Federal Facilities 8
Fund Balancing 6
Grants 1
Hazardous Substances 171*
Health/Toxics 9
HRS 28
24
* Hot topics for this month.
••Includes 619 Message Retrievals.
•Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in multiple
questions.
-------
August 1992
Call Analyses
Liability
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages
NBARs
NCP
Notification
NPL
Off Site Policy
On Site Policy
OSHA
PA/SI
PRPs
Public Participation
RCRA Interface
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
Response
RI/FS
ROD
RQ
SARA Interface
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
State Program
Taxes
Tide ID/Right-to-Know
72*
0
14
2
30
44
166*
8
4
5
8
22
5
10
1
16
10
6
27
25
229*
6
13
19
1
6
2
67
TOTAL 1,71s2
2Includes 435 Superfund document requests.
OUST
General/Misc. 145
Applicability/Definitions 61
Regulated Substances 16
Standards for New Tank Systems 17
Tank Standards and Upgrading 16
Operating Requirements 19
Release Detection 47
Release Reporting & Investigation 23
Corrective Action for USTs 21
Out-of-Service/Closure 35
Financial Responsibility 112
State Programs 21
Liabiliry^Enforcement 19
LUST Trust Fund 11
TOTAL 5633
^Includes 102 OUST document requests.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
Tide m General 287
§301-3 Emergency Planning
General 97
SERCs/LEPC 17
Notification 5
Mixtures 1
Extremely Hazardous Substances 8
Delisting EHS 0
Exemptions 2
§304:
General 41
Notification Requirements 24
Reportable Quantities 23
RQs vs. TPQs 14
Transportation 1
Exemptions 9
§311/312:
General 105
MSDS Reporting Requirements 21
Tier VII Regulations 55
Thresholds 33
OSHA Expansion 5
Hazard Categories 5
Mixtures 8
Exemptions 24
§313:
General
FormR
Thresholds
Phase I
Phase II
Phase ffl
Pollution Prevention
NONs/NOTEs
Petitions
Health Effects
Database
Exemptions
1,108*
3,506*
415
295
29
0
268*
4
13
1
73
133
Training:
General 1
§305 Training Grants 0
§305 Emergency Systems Review 0
§ 126 (SARA) Training Regulations 0
* Hot topics for this month.
• Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in
multiple questions.
25
-------
Call Analyses
August 1992
General:
CEPP Interim Guide
Chemical Profile
NRT-1
Hazard Analysis
Risk Communication
Title ffl Workshops
Information Management
Prevention ARIP
Other
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
13
Trade Secrets
Enforcement
Liability
TOTAL
4
35
2
6,6894
4 Includes 1,180 Emergency Planning Community
Right-To-Know document requests.
26
• Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in multiple
questions.
-------
LIST OF ADDRESSEES:
EdAbnuns,OS-332
Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7
Kate Andersen, OS-S20
Irene Atney-Yurdin, DOE-NY
Jennifer Barker, OS-305
Beth Behrens, EPA-NEIC
Kathy Bishop, OS-210
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idabo
Susan Bromm, OS-500
RkkBrandes,OS-330
Karen Brown, A-149C
Nancy Browne, OS-520
Kathy Bruneske, OS-305
Karen Burgan, OS-110
Heather Bums, Hotline
Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2
Sabrina Callihan, DOE
Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1
Sonia Chambers, EPA-Reg. 5
Richard Clarizio, EPA-Reg. 5
Don R. Clay, OS-100
Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9
Bill Cosgrove, EPA-Reg. 4
Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama
Becky Cuthbertson, OS-320W
Elaine Davies, OS-100
Jeffery Denit, OS-300
Lynn DePont, OS-305
Director, RED, LE-134S
Dave Eberly, OS-343
Chris Elias, C A Dept. of Health
Terry Escarda, CA Dept of Health
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn.
Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX
Alan Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR
Kristin Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8
John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2
Cheryl Graham, LE-132S
Jim Hayden, DEC-Alaska
Betty HoUowell, DOE-TX
Hinton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5
Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4
Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10
Tom Jacobs, EPA-Reg. 5
Carol Jacobson OS-5203G
Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7
Kathy Jones, OS-210
Tun Jones, OS-301
GaryJonesi,LE-134S
Ron Josephson, OS-333
TonyJover,OS-120
Robert Kayser, OS-333
Jeff Kelly, OS-520
Mitch Kidwell,OS-332
Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA
William Kline, OS-322W
Robert Knox.OS-130
Dan Kovacks, Hotline
Walter KovaUck, OS-110
Judy Lebowich, WH-550E
Henry Longest, OS-100
JimLoomis, FLERC
Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300
Julia Lebee, EPA-Reg. 4
Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5
James Makris, OS-120
Andrea McLaughlin, OS-S203G
Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7
Dorothy McManus, OS-120
Tami McNamara, TS-779
Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3
Kim Mercer, EPA-Reg. 9
Margaret Meares, EPA-Reg. 4
Charlotte Mooney, OS-332
Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7
Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6
Susan OXeefe,LE-134S
ChaePak, EPA-Reg. 10
Myra Perez, EPA-Houston
Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3
Dan Powell, OS-HOW
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9
John Riley, OS-210
Barbara Roth, OS-305
Debbie Rutherford, OS-420WF
William Sanjour, OS-330
Sam Sasnett, TS-779
Tun Schoepke, TS-793
Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard
Stergios Spanos, NH DES
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Kathie Stein, LE-134S
Heather Stockard, DEC-Alaska
Kathy Teenier, Hotline
Beverly Thomas, OS-420WF
Jim Thompson, OS-520
Linda Thompson, LE-134S
Robert Thompson, A-104
Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK
Harriett Tregoning, PM-220
Bern VanEpps, OS-240
Cane VanHook, OS-305
David Van Slyke, LE-134S
Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8
David Watson, PM-214F
Howard Wilson, PM-273
Denise Wright, OS-332
Mia Zmud, OS-305
OSW Division Directors
OSW Deputy Division Directors
OSW Branch Chiefs
Hazardous Waste Management Division Directors,
Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
------- |