EPA530-R-93-004t-
PB93-922 006
MONTHLY HOTLINE REPORT
June 1993
RCRA/SF/OUST and EPCRA *
Hotline Questions and Answers
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 1
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) 4
New Publications
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 7
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) 8
Other 9
1H| Federal Registers
Final Rules 11
Proposed Rules 12
Notices i 12
Call Analyses
Calls Answered 19
Caller Profiles 21
Hotline Topics
3
RCRA/SF/OUST
National ToM-Free No.: 800-424-9346
TDD National Toil-Free No.: 800-553-7672
EPCRA
National Toil-Free No.: 800-535-0202
This report» prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039.
EPA Project Officer:
Carie VanHook Jasperse. (202) 260-7388
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington. DC 20460
Printed on
Recycled Paper
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
RCRA
1. Sample Holding Times and Validity
of Analytical Results
When characterizing waste as hazardous
or nonhazardous under RCRA Subtitle C,
§262.11 provides that a generator has the
option of either applying knowledge of the
hazardous characteristics of the waste or
testing the waste. If the generator chooses to
test a waste to determine if it exhibits the
toxicity characteristic under 40 CFR §26124,
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure • Method 1311 (TCLP) must be
used to generate a waste extract. This extract
is then analyzed for the 39 constituents listed
in Table 1 of §261 24. To ensure that
accurate results are obtained, there are
specific quality control measures for the
extraction and analysis procedures, including
limits on the amount of time samples can be
held during testing. When these sample
holding times are exceeded, can the results of
constituent analysis on a TCLP extract still be
used to determine if a waste exhibits the
toxicity characteristic?
When sample holding times are exceeded,
TCLP analytical results will be considered the
minimum amount that could leach from the
waste; an identical sample analyzed within the
prescribed holding times might yield higher
concentrations of toxicity characteristic
constituents (Part 261, Appendix n, §8.4).
EPA's manufll Test Methods
Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods
(SW-846, Second Edition) defines sample
holding time as the storage time allowed
between field collection of a sample and
completion of analysis in a laboratory. Specific
maximum holding times are set for quality
assurance and quality control purposes. Certain
constituents in waste, such as volatile organic
compounds, can degrade or volatilize over time.
When constituents in a sample are lost through
these natural chemical processes, analytical
measurements become inaccurate. To limit
sample degradation, maximum holding times
are developed based on the propensity of the
waste constituents to degrade or volatilize.
General guidelines for sample holding times are
presented in Volume 1, Chapters 2,3, and 4 of
SW-846, and additional method-specific
requirements may appear in the individual test
methods themselves. Outlined in section 8.4 of
Method 131 l(Part 261, Appendix IT), maximum
TCLP sample holding .times range from a total
of 28 days for volatiles to 360 days for metals.
These overall time frames are further broken
down, specifying the length of time allowed for
each step in the analytical process. For
example, volatile samples are allowed 14 days
for leachate extraction and another 14 days for
constituent analysis, while die breakdown for
semivolatiles allows 14 days for leachate
extraction, 7 days for extract preparation, and
40 days for constituent analysis. When sample
holding times are exceeded, measurements may
be inaccurate and the TCLP analysis may be
invalid or inconclusive.
When analysis is conducted after a sample
holding time is exceeded, however, the results
may still have limited applicability. Because
some constituents are lost through volatilization
-------
Hotline Question* and Answers
June 1993
or degradation while awaiting testing,
constituent concentrations in expired samples
will be lower than if the sample were fresh. If
a sample exceeds a recommended holding
time and analysis demonstrates that
concentrations are above the regulatory
threshold for one or more constituents, then
these concentrations can be treated as
minimum values and the waste is hazardous
for the toxicity characteristic. No further
testing is required If , on the other hand, a
sample exceeds a recommended holding time
and analysis demonstrates that concentrations
are below the regulatory threshold for one or
more constituents, further testing may be
necessary to demonstrate that the waste is
nonhazardous. If the generator chooses to
conduct further testing, additional samples
would be required to ensure accurate
measurement of constituents and to provide a
definitive waste determination under RCRA
Subtitle C.
2. Containment Buildings at Permitted
and Interim Status Facilities
EPA recently promulgated regulations for
containment buildings, a new type of
hazardous waste management unit used for
treatment and storage of hazardous wastes.
What procedures must permitted and interim
status facilities follow when adding
containment buildings?
On August 18,1992, EPA promulgated a
rule defining and establishing management
standards for a new type of unit called a
containment building (57 £& 37194; August
18,1992). A facility operating under a RCRA
permit may seek to add containment buildings
to its permitted operations in two situations ~
it may seek to convert existing units (e.g.,
enclosed waste piles) to containment
buildings, or it may seek to construct new
containment buildings. With respect to the
first situation, EPA believes that many
facilities will convert their existing enclosed
waste piles to containment buildings (57 FR
37218). This will require a Class 2
modification (57 £R 37218; 40 CFR §270.42,
Appendix I, Item 1,6). Construction to
implement Class 2 changes generally may
commence 60 days after submission of the
permit modification request (§270.42(b)(8)).
If the Agency does not respond within 90
days (or 120 days if the Agency requests an
extension), the facility is automatically
authorized to conduct the requested activity
for 180 days., During this time, the facility is
required to comply with applicable Part 265
standards in conducting the activity
(§270.42(bX6)(iii)). The construction of new
containment buildings requires a Class 2 or 3
permit modification, depending on whether
the addition of the buildings increases the
facility's containment building storage or
treatment capacity by more than 25 percent
(57 £R 37281; §270.42, Appendix I, Item
M, 1). Class 3 modifications are required at
facilities with no existing containment
building capacity. Class 3 permit
modifications require formal EPA approval;
there is no deadline for Agency action and no
provision for automatic authorization in the
absence of an Agency decision (53 ER
37919).
Permitted facilities may apply for a
temporary authorization under §270.42(e). A
temporary authorization may be granted for
up to 180 days and may be reissued for an
additional 180 days provided that the facility
has submitted a request for a permit
modification. Requests for temporary
authorization must demonstrate compliance
with Part 264 standards and also meet the
criteria in §270.42(e) for approval.
-------
June 1993
Hotline Questions and Answers
A facility operating under interim status
may add new treatment processes or
additional treatment or storage capacity, such
as containment buildings, by using existing
procedures for changes during interim status
under §§270.72(a)(2) and (a)(3). The facility
must submit a revised Part A permit
application and a justification explaining the
need for the change, which must be approved
by EPA before implementing any
construction. According to §270.72(b),
changes generally may not be made if they
amount to reconstruction of the hazardous
waste management facility. The Agency
considers the facility "reconstructed" if the
capital investment for the changes to the
facility exceed 50 percent of the capital cost
of a comparable, entirely new hazardous
waste management facility (57 ER 37242).
The reconstruction limit does not apply,
however, if the changes are made in order to
treat or store in tanks, containers, or
containment buildings provided that the
changes are made solely to comply with
Part 268 (§270.72(b)(6)).
Containment buildings are not considered
newly regulated units. In the August 18,
1992, Federal Register. EPA simply
reclassified existing units, which may have
been classified as indoof waste piles or certain
miscellaneous units, as containment buildings
in order to facilitate treatment of hazardous
debris and other wastes. The procedural
provisions for newly regulated units are thus
not applicable to owners and operators of
facilities that want to construct containment
buildings. For instance, §§270.42(g) and
270.72(a)(6), which allow continued
management of hazardous wastes in newly
regulated units without prior Agency action,
cannot be used to add containment buildings
to a facility. Likewise, facilities that do not
currently manage hazardous waste and want
to begin managing hazardous waste in
containment buildings or to construct
containment buildings for the management of
hazardous waste may not gain interim status.
The facility must first obtain a RCRA permit
before any construction or waste management
activities may begin (57 ER 36241-36242).
Generators also may add containment
buildings for accumulating and treating
hazardous wastes. Under §262.34, generators
may accumulate or treat hazardous waste in
on-site tanks or containers for up to 90 days
without a permit as long as the applicable Part
265, Subpart I (for containers) or Subpart J (for
tanks) standards are followed. The
August 18,1992, Federal Register also applied
this provision to containment buildings. The
units must be in compliance with Part 265,
Subpart DD standards, and with certain
recordkeeping requirements.
3. Closure Timetable Following
Termination of Interim Status
According to 40 tfjl §270.73(g), interim
status terminates on November 8,1992, for
any facility, other than a land disposal or
incinerator facility, that achieved interim
status prior to November 8,1984, unless the
facility's owner or operator submitted a RCRA
Pan B permit application by November 8,
1988. A hazardous waste tank storage facility
has operated under interim status since 1982,
but the facility's owner I operator failed to
submit a Pan B permit application prior to the
1988 deadline. Assuming the facility does not
have an approved closure plan, what deadlines
must the owner I operator meet in submitting a
closure plan and conducting closure activities
in accordance with Pan 265, Subpart G,
following the loss of interim status in
November 1992?
-------
Hotline Questions and Answers
June 1993
Because the owner/operator failed to
submit a Part B permit application prior to
November 8,1988, die tank storage facility
loses interim status on November 8,1992
(§270.73(g)). Section 265.112(d)(3) requires
the owner/operator to submit a closure plan to
the Regional Administrator no later than 15
days after termination of interim status, except
when a permit is issued simultaneously.
Accordingly, the owner/operator of the tank
storage facility was required to submit a
closure plan no later than November 23,1992.
Assuming the facility's closure plan is
approved after November 8,1992, the date of
approval of the closure plan triggers the series
of deadlines for subsequent activities. Within
90 days following approval of the closure plan,
the owner/operator of the tank storage facility
must treat, remove from the facility, or dispose
of on-site all hazardous wastes in accordance
with the approved closure plan (§265.113(a)).
Similarly, within 180 days following approval
of the closure plan the owner/operator must
complete closure activities in accordance with
the approved closure plan (§265.113(b)). The
Regional Administrator may approve longer
time periods if the owner/operator makes
certain demonstrations, specified in
§§265.113(a)( 1) and 265.113(aX2) for
treatment, removal, or disposal of hazardous
wastes and in §§265.113(b)(l) and
265.113(b)(2) for completion of closure
activities.
After final closure of the tank storage
facility is complete, the owner/operator has up
to 60 days to submit a certification of closure
to the Regional Administrator (§265.115).
This document, signed by both die owner/
operator and an independent registered
professional engineer, certifies that the facility
has been closed in accordance with the
specifications of the approved closure plan.
Within 60 days after receiving a satisfactory
certification of closure, the Regional
Administrator will notify the owner/operator
in writing that he/she is no longer subject to
financial assurance requirements for final
closure (§265.143(h)).
4. Unused Formulations of Agent
Orange
During the Vietnam War an estimated 44
million pounds of the herbicide Agent Orange
were formulated for use as a defoliant.
Currently there are several United States
military posts in possession of unused
formulations of this herbicide. Upon disposal,
would the herbicide Agent Orange be
regulated as a hazardous waste under RCRA
Subtitle C?
Unused formulations of Agent Orange
would meet the F027 hazardous waste
listing when disposed of. The active herbicidal
components of Agent Orange are equal
quantities of 2,4,-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
(2,4,5-T), which are both derived from the
synthesis of chlorophtnols and chlorophenoxy
compounds. The listing description of F027
includes discarded unused formulations
containing compounds derived from tri-,
tetra-, or pentachlorophenol. Since Agent
Orange contains a compound derived from the
synthesis of trichkxophenol (i.e., 2,4,5-T), it is
appropriately classified as F027 upon disposal.
CERCLA
5. State Authority in Selecting the
Remedy at State-lead Superf und
Sites
CERCLA §121(f) provides for "substantial
and meaningfuT' involvement by each state in
the initiation, development, and selection of
remedial actions to be undertaken at
-------
June 1993 Hotline Questions and Answers
Superfund sites in that state. In addition,
CERCLA §104(d)(l) provides for states to
assume the lead at Fund-financed sites through
Cooperative Agreements. The lead agency is
responsible for preparing the Record of
Decision (ROD) and other primary documents.
If a state is designated as the lead agency at a
Fund-financed site and there is controversy
over the remedy, does the final authority over
remedy selection rest with EPA or the state
agency?
EPA retains final decision-making
authority in selecting the remedy at Fund-
financed sites even when the state is the lead
agency. Before a state may proceed with a
Fund-financed response action, EPA must first
concur with and adopt the ROD. Pursuant to
40 CFR §300.515(e)(2)(ii), unless EPA's
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and
Emergency Response or Regional
Administrator concurs in writing with a state-
prepared ROD, EPA is not deemed to have
approved the state decision and the remedy
may not be initiated. According to the
preamble to the National Contingency Plan
(NCP), "EPA believes that, although Congress
contemplated an increased role for states in the
remedial process through the enactment of
CERCLA §121(f), it should retain primary
responsibility for die federal Superfund
program." In addition, the NCP notes that
retaining authority for final remedy selection
within EPA (rather than dispersing it among
the 50 states and EPA) furthers the goal for
consistent implementation of remedies at sites
(55 ER 8666,8783).
-------
NEW PUBLICATIONS
HOW TO ORDER
NT1S Publication* are available by calling (703) 487-4650, or writing NTIS. 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
VA 22161. Use the NTIS Order Number listed under the document
EPA Publications are available through the Hotline. UM the EPA Order Number listed under the document
RCRA/SF/OUST 1 -800-424-9346 EPCRA/Title III 1 -800-535-0202
local 703-412-9810 local 703-412-9877
RCRA
TITLE: "Used Dry Cell Batteries: Is A
Collection Program Right for Your
Community?"
AVAILABILITY: Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: EPA530-K-92-006
This handbook is designed to assist
communities in deciding whether establishing
a program to collect used dry cell batteries
would be beneficial. It addresses the creation
and management of a collection program and
provides examples of existing collection
programs and state legislation. Issues such as
public education, program costs, and program
effectiveness are also addressed. The
handbook includes statistics dating back to
1975 on the contribution of batteries to the
municipal solid wastestream and describes
future trends in the quantity of batteries in the
municipal solid wastestream. The handbook
Lists reference materials and recyclers of dry
cell batteries in the United States.
TITLE: "Household Hazardous Waste: Steps
to Safe Management"
AVAILABILITY: Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: EPA530-F-92-031
This pamphet presents safe management
practices for household hazardous wastes such
as cleaning solutions, paints, pesticides, car
batteries, and motor oil that can be potential
risks to humans and the environment It also
provides an introduction to issues such as
source reduction, recycling, and possible
hazards of improper handling. Additionally,
the pamphlet lists reference documents that are
available through EPA which address the
household hazardous waste issue.
TITLE: "Markets for Recovered Aluminum"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-170 132
This document presents a general overview of
the recycling market for aluminum. Aimed at
the general public, it addresses factors such as
growth and trends in the aluminum market,
government policies, supply and demand for
scrap aluminum, and information about
initiatives to increase aluminum recycling. The
document includes statistics from 1970 to
1990, and lists useful reference materials
regarding the aluminum market
-------
New Publications
June 1993
TITLE: "Summary of Markets for Recovered
Aluminum"
AVAILABILITY: Hotline
EPA ORDER NO.: EPA530-SW-90-072B
This booklet summarizes EPA's Markets For
Recovered Aluminum. It descibes factors
affecting the current supply and demand for
recovered aluminum, and provides information
on future market trends.
CERCLA
TITLE: "Quality Assurance for Superfund
Environmental Data Collection Activities"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963273
This fact sheet provides Superfund program
participants with an overview of Superfund
quality assurance requirements for data
collection activities. The information in the
fact sheet is pertinent to all Superfund site
managers, including remedial project managers
(RPMs), site assessment managers (S AMs),
and on-scene coordinators (OSCs).
TITLE: "Further Direction on Implementing
the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963 291
This memorandum provides a summary of
progress to date in implementing SACM.
Additionally, the memorandum provides an
overview of goals and strategies for the full
implementation of SACM in the 1994 fiscal
year.
TITLE: "Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Shan:
Provision in Superfund Contracts"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963336
This memorandum requests Regional offices to
re-examine existing Superfund State Contracts
(SSCs) for Fund-financed remedial actions to
verify that they adequately reflect incurred and
projected remedial action costs. The
memorandum provides a general overview of the
subject, and includes an attached statement given
by Administrator Browner to the House Energy
and Commerce Subcommittee on the subject of
contracts management
TITLE: "Response Action Contractor Final
Indemnification Guidelines"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963290
This intermittent bulletin issued by the Superfund
Revitalization Office provides an update on
current indemnification issues and resolutions.
Specifically, this bulletin announces the
establishment of an indemnification hotline that
will address issues, questions, and concerns
regarding response action contractor
indemnification.
TITLE: "Superfund At Work: Hazardous Waste
Cleanup Efforts Nationwide (French Limited)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963609
The "Superfund at Work" bulletin series profiles
hazardous waste sites nationwide. This issue
provides an overview of the cleanup at the
French Limited Site in Harris, Texas.
-------
June 1993
New Publications
TITLE: "Superfund at Work: Hazardous
Waste Cleanup Efforts Nationwide (Old
Midland Products)"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963608
The "Superfund at Work" bulletin series
profiles hazardous waste sites nationwide.
This issue provides an overview of the cleanup
at the Old Midland Products Site in Yell,
Arkansas.
TITLE: "Superfund Administrative
Improvements: Final Report"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: PB93-963295
On June 22,1993, Deputy Administrator
Robert Sussman announced an agenda for
making further improvements to the Superfund
program. These administrative improvements
are designed to enhance enforcement fairness,
cleanup effectiveness, public involvement,
state rules, and reduce transaction costs. This
report outlines these administrative
improvements and establishes target dates for
completion of these initiatives.
April 1993
May 1993
June 1993
PB93-922 404
530-R-93-004d
PB93-922 405
530-R-93-004e
PB93-922 406
530-R-93-004f
The reports contain questions that required
EPA resolution or were frequently asked,
publications availability, Federal Register
summaries, and Hotline call statistics.
OTHER
TITLE: "Monthly Hotline Report"
AVAILABILITY: NTIS
NTIS ORDER NO.: See below
Yearly Subscription PB93-922400
530-R-93-004
January 1993
February 1993
March 1993
PB93-922401
530-R-93-004a
PB93-922402
530-R-93-004b
PB93-922403
530-R-93-004c
-------
FINAL RULES
RCRA
"Wisconsin; Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management Program
Revisions'*
June 2,1993 (58 EB 31344)
Tliis final rule affirmed EPA's earlier decision
(57 EB 15029; April 24,1992) to authorize
Wisconsin's revised hazardous waste program.
Final authorization for these revisions will be
effective August 2,1993, unless EPA publishes a
prior action withdrawing this man^ji^tf. final note.
Comments must be received by July 2,1993.
" North Carolina; Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management Program
Revisions"
June 3,1993 (58 EB 31474)
This action concced the list of authorities
published on April 27,1992 (57 EB 15255). That
rule incorrectly authorized North Carolina for
§§3005(JX 3004(dX 3004(qX2XAX and 3004(rX2)
and (3) of HSWA. These sections were
deauthorized with this action. This rule is effective
June 3,1993.
"PotycWorinated BJphenyb (PCBs) and
Use of Waste Oil; Correction"
June 8,1993 (58 EB 32060)
This final ruk corrected the technical
aUKIUQKE
iment
to the Toxic Substances Control Act PCB
regulations pubHshed on March 23,1993 (58 ER
15435). This conection is effective
March 23,1993.
"Virginia; Authorization of State Hazardous
Waste Management Program Revisions"
June 14,1993 (58 EB 32855)
EPA intends to approve Virginia's hazardous
waste program revisions. Final authorization for
these revisions will be effective August 13,1993,
unless EPA publishes a prior action withdrawing
this immediate final rule. Comments must be
received by July 14,1993.
" Identification and Listing of Hazardous
Waste, Recycled Used OB; Correction"
June 17,1993 (58 EB 33341)
EPA corrected errors in the regulations published
on May 3,1993 (58 EB 26420). In that notice, EPA
inadvertently amended several sections of Pan 279
dealing with the notification requirements for used
oil handlers. This action corrected the error by
restoring die original language.
RCRA/CERCLA
"OMB Approval Numbers Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)"
June 25,1993 (58 EB 34369)
EPA published a table of current information
collection request (ICR) control numbers for
various regulations under RCRA and CERCLA as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act The
table lists the section numbers or parts with
repoding and reconflceeping requirements, and then-
current OMB con&ol numbers.
11
-------
Federal Registers
June 1993
CERCLA/EPCRA
"Reportabte Quantity (RQ) Adjustments for
Lead Metal, Lead Compounds, Lead-
Containing Hazardous Wastes,
and Methyl Isocyanate"
June 30,1993 (58 EB 35314)
EPA promulgated RQ adjustments for 30
hazardous substances. Adjusted RQs were
proposed for these hazardous substances on
May 8,1992 (57 £R 20014). These hazardous
substances include lead metal, 12 lead compounds,
15 wastestreams listed under RCRA, RCRA
characteristic wastes that fail the TCLP far lead, and
methyl isocyanate.
EPCRA
'Technical Amendments to OMB Approval
Numbers"
June 23,1993 (58 EB 34198)
To consolidate the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) control numbers issued under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, EPA published technical
amendments to various EPA regulations with
infonnatwncolkctkwieqijirements. This rule
affected §372 of EPCRA, with die OMB control
number now listed as 2070-0093.
PROPOSED RULES
CERCLA
"National Priorities Ust (NPL); Proposal to
Add17Sttes"
June 23,1993 (58 EB 34018)
EPA proposed to add 17 sites to the NFL; 7 in the
general Superfund section and 10 in the federal
facilities section. This proposal increases the
number of proposed sites to 71, and the total
number of final and proposed sites to 1,270.
Comments must be submitted on or before
July 23,1993, for the South Weymouth Materials
Technology Laboratory and Portsmouth Naval
Shipyard Sites. Comments must be submitted on or
before August 23,1993, for all other sites in this
proposal
EPCRA
'Toxic Chemtaals; Barium SuKate"
June 11,1993 (58 EB 32622)
EPA proposed to exempt barium sulfate from the
reporting requirements under the category "barium
compounds" on the list of toxic chemicals under
§313 of EPCRA. Comments must be submitted on
or before August 10,1993.
NOTICES
RCRA
"Categories and Regulatory Schedule for
Air Emissions from Other Solid Waste
Incinerators"
June 2,1993 (58 EB 31358)
This notice announced the availability of a list of
types of incinerators to be included under die
category of other solid waste incinerators and a
regulatory schedule for these units, as required by
§129 of the Clean Air Act Amendments.
Comments must be received on or before
July 2,1993.
12
-------
June 1993
Federal Registers
NOTICES
•Vermont; Aufcorbation of State Hazardous
Waste Management Program Revisions"
June 7,1993 (58 EB 31911)
EPA reopened the comment period for the
immediate final rule concerning final authorization
of the Stale of Vermont's hazardous waste
management program revisions published on
May 3,1993 (58 £R 26242). Final authorization for
Vermont will be effective August 6,1993, unless
EPA publishes a prior action withdrawing die
May 3,1993, rule. Comments must be received on
or before July 7,1993.
"Science Advisory Board; Meeting"
June 11.1993 (58 FR 32673)
The Ecological Processes and Effects Committee
of the EPA Science Advisory Board will meet on
June 21-23,1993, in Alexandria, Virginia, to
evaluate the ecological risk assessment in the RCRA
Corrective Action Regulatory Impact Analysis.
"Open Meeting on the Definition of SoOd
Waste and Hazardous Waste Recycling"
June 14,1993 (58 EB 32881)
EPA win conduct a public meeting on revising the
regulatory definition of sotid waste under RCRA on
July 7-8,1993, in Washington, DC
"EnvhonmeiUal Economics Advisory
Comrnjttee(EEAC); Open Meeting"
June 18,1993 (58 EB 33631)
EPA gave notice that EEACwfll meet on
July 13,1993, in Washington, DQ lo review the
economic methodologies noted in the draft
document Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) for the
phial I^ilemaking on Corrective Action for SnKH
Wajfrt Management Units. The meeting is open to
the public.
"New Source Performance Standards and
Emission Guidelines for Municipal Solid
Waste (MSW) Landfills"
June 21,1993 (58 EB 33790)
EPA announced the availability of additional data
pursuant to new source performance standards and
emissions guidelines proposed on May 30,1991 (56
EB 24468). These standards and guidelines required
by §§11 l(b) and (d) of the dean Air Act apply to
municipal sotid waste landfills Comments must be
received on or before July 21,1993.
"California; Adequacy Determination of
State Municipal Solid Waste Program"
June 29,1993 (58 EB 34797)
EPA made a tentative detennination that certain
portions of California's Municipal Solid Waste
T anrifill (MSWIF) permit program anp jyfrypmti* <"
ensure compliance with die revised MS WLF
criteria. Comments must be received on or before
August 24,1993.
s
"Extension of Comment Period; Wood
Surface Protection Waste (F033)"
June 30,1993 (58 EB 34977)
EPA extended the comment period for the
proposed nile to list certain hazardous wastes from
the use of chlorophenolic formulations in the wood
surface protection industry as P033 (58 EB 25706;
April 27,1993). Comments must now be received
on or before July 14,1993.
RCRA/CERCLA
"Agency ^formation Collection Activities
Under OMB Review"
June 2,1993 (58 EB 31383)
This notice announced the Office of Management
and Budget's responses to EPA clearance requests.
13
-------
Federal Registers
June 1993
NOTICES
Several clearance requests were addressed, including defendants to itimburse the United States
the RCRA Part A Hazardous Waste Permit $13 mfllkn for costs incuned at the Swope Site.
ApplkaiMnfbrmandtne>ifotificaiionofHazanfcus Comments will be received far a period of 30 days
Waste Activity form. from the date of this notice.
"Proposed Consent Decree; Pacific Coast
Pipeline Site"
June 4, 1993 (58 EB 31755)
A proposed Consent Decree in ilciffii
Texaco. Ire.. was lodged with the U.S. District
Court for the Central District of California on
May 24, 1993, pursuant to §§106 and 107 of
CERCLAand§7003ofRCRA Under this Consent
Decree, future EPA oversight costs incurred at die
Pacific Coast Pipeline Site will be recovered
Comments will be received for 30 days from Ac
date of this notice.
"Science Advisory Board (SAB);
Environmental Engineering Committee
(EEC) Meeting"
June 8, 1993 (58 EB 321 22)
The EECs MMSOILS Model Review
Subcommittee wOl meet on June 29- July 1, 1993, in
Washington, DC, to discuss EPA's computer model,
MMSOILS. MMSOILS figures prominently in the
RCRA corrective action regulatory impact analysis
and the Superfund Groundwater Strategic Plan.
CERCLA
"Proposed Consent Decree; Swope OH and
Chemical Site"
June 1,1993 (58 EB 31219)
A proposed Consent Decree in yjfflcd_Sja|Kv.
was lodged with the U.S. District
'Proposed Administrative Settlement;
Mexam Trucking Removal Site, Catexfco,
CaWomia"
June 4,1993 (58 EB 31712)
EPA entered into a settlement requiring settling
parties to pay $14,835 in response costs for the
Mexam Trucking Removal Site. Comments must
be submitted on or before July 6,1993.
"Proposed Settlement Agreement;
Delaware Sand and Gravel Site"
June 4,1993 (58 EB 31754)
A settlement agreement in In TC fiFf Tnrftistrjeji
ID£, was lodged with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court far
the District of Delaware on May 25,1993. The
settlement agreement requires the defendant to pay
$50,000. Comments witt-be received for a period of
30 days from the date of this notice.
"Proposed Amended Consent Decree;
Algoma Municipal Landfill Site"
June 9,1993 (58 EB 32364)
A proposed amended Consent Decree in Ujuffid
States v. (Itvnf Algnma.etaL. waslnHgfdfin
June 3,1993, with the US. District Court for the
Hasten District of Wisconsin. The amended
Consent Decree requires the setting patties to
perfonn and finance the final remedy in die Record
of Decision for the Algoma Site. Comments will be
received for a period of 30 days from the date of this
notice.
Court for die District of New Jeraey on
May 19, 1993. The Consent Decree requires
14
-------
June 1993
Federal Registers
NOTICES
"Proposed Consent Decree; Stringfeflow
Site, Riverside, California"
June 10, 1993 (58 EB 32548)
A proposed Consent Deoee in !JnjlEd_
J J3. StringfeDow. Jr. et al. was lodged with the U.S.
District Cburt for the Centi^ District cf^
onMay28, 1993. The Consent Decree requites
General Sted and Wire Company, Inc., to transfer to
the United States and the Stale of California all of
the funds in a special settlement account ($2,848,500
plus interest). Comments win be received for 30
days from the date of this notice.
"National Advisory Council for
Environmental Poflcy and Technology
(NACEPT); Superfund Evaluation
Committee Meeting"
June 11, 1993 (58 EB 32671)
The Superfund Evaluation Committee of
NACEPT will meet on several days in the months of
June-September 1993 to review the cuwent
performance of the Superfund program and identify
possible improvements.
"Disclosure of Confidential Business
Information (CBI)"
June 14, 1993 (58 EB 32943)
EPA gave notice that CBI submitted to EPA
Region 9 under CERCLA § 104 wfll be disclosed to
its contractor, Science Applications International
Corporation. Affected patties have 10 wodting days
from the date of this notice to submit comments.
"Proposed Settlements; M.T. Richards, Inc."
June 16,1993 (58 EB 33272)
Pursuant to §1220X1) of CERCLA, EPA gave
notice of two proposed administrative settlements
concerning the M.T. Richards Superfund Site of
QossvilJe, Illinois. The agreement was approved by
the Department of Justice on June 2,1993, and is
subject to review by the public. Comments must be
provided on or before July 16,1993.
•
"Access to Confidential Business
Information (CBI)"
June 18,1993 (58 £B 33629)
EPA authorized Ronson Management Corporatkn
of Springfield, Virginia, for access to information
that w^submitied to EPA under §104 of CERCLA
andmaybedetominedtDDeCBL EPA began
transferring the data five working days from the date
of this notice.
"Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease
Registry (ATSDR); Meeting"
June 18,1993 (58 EB 33634)
ATSDR announced a meeting to take place on
July 27 - July 29,1993, in Boston, Massachusetts.
The meeting will address the ATSDR Public Health
Assessment process as it applies to Department of
Defense sits.
15
-------
Federal Registers
June 1993
NOTICES
'VVgency for Toxic Substance and Disease
Registry (AT8DR) PubOc Health
June 21,1993 (58 EB 33821)
ATSDR released a list of health assessments for
completed and proposed Superfund sites and a list of
Superfund sites far which ATSDR has prepared a
public health assessment in response to a request
from the public. These are quarterly announcements
tor the period January - March 1993, pursuant to
§104(0 of GERCLA.
"Proposed Administrative Settlement;
Sunbelt Site"
June 23,1993 (58 EB 34047)
In accordance with §122(0(1) of CERCLA, EPA
provided notice of a proposed administrative cost
recovery settlement concerning the Sunbelt Sile in
Texas. Notice of this settlement was published
previously on May 5,1993 (58 ER 26783), but only
listed 31 of the 33 respondents who are required to
pay. Comments on this proposal must be received
on or before July 23,1993.
"Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease
Registry (ATSDR); Environmental Health
Education Activities"
June 29,1993 (58 EB 34806)
ATSDR announced the availability of fiscal year
1993 fuwk for state departments of health and state
departments of environment to educate health
professionals and communities on issues related to
human exposure to hazardous substances in the
environment Applications must be submitled on or
before July 31,1993.
"Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease
Registry (ATSDR); Health Services
biltiativesN
June 29,1993 (58 EB 34809)
ATSDR announced the availability of fiscal year
1993 funds for a grant program to conduct health
studies based on immune function disorders.
Applications must be submitted on or before
July 24,1993.
EPCRA
'Toxic Chemical Rolooso Reporting;
Technical Amendment"
June 9,1993 (58 EB 32304)
EPA corrected three errors in the list of toxic
chemicals published on February 16,1988 (53 ER
4309). Two of the corrections are for typographical
errors for the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
registry numbers for freon-113 and di (20-
ethylhexyOphthalate. The third correction is to replace
the listing for methylenetis(phenylisocyanaie) (MBI)
with methyienebis(phenylisocyanate) (MDI).
"Clean Air Act (CAA); Hydrogen Fluoride
Study-
June 17,1993 (58 EB 33441)
EPA gave notice of a public meeting to present and
discuss die preliminary findings of a study of die uses
and hazards of hydrogen fluoride as required under
§112(nX6)ofCAA. The meeting will take place at
EPA on July 12,1993. Those who wish to attend must
register by July 7,1993.
16
-------
Jun* 1993 Federal Registers
NOTICES
"Agency Information Collection Activities
Under OMB Review"
June 18,1993 (58 EB 33628)
EPA gave notice that die Accidental Release
Infatuation Program (ARIP) has been submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget far review
and comment ARIP coflects data on the causes of
chemical accidents and points to steps that could be
taken by industrial facilities to prevent accidental
releases. Comments on this notice must be
submitted on or before July 19,1993.
"Chromium, Nickel, end Copper in Stainless
Steel, Brass, and Bronze"
June 29,1993 (58 EB 34738)
EPA denied three petitions to exempt the reporting
of chromium, nickel, and copper when contained in
stainless steel, brass, bronze, and other alloys from
the list of toxic chemicals subject to §313 of
EPGRA. Comments on this notice must be received
on or before August 30,1993.
17
-------
CALL ANALYSES
CALLS ANSWERED BY HOTLINE
June Daily Volume*
700 y
600 ••
i *
500 ••
400 ••
300 ••
I.
200 ••
100 • •
Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know
RCRA/SROUSr
H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1—I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30
Year to Date*
RCRA/SF/OUST
January
February
March
April
May
June
Month
11,299
10,688
11,996
10,493
10,035
10,977
Cumulative
21,987
33,983
44,476
54,511
64,488
EMERGENCY PLA
COMMUNITY RK3H
January
February
March
April
May
June
Month
2,772
4,167
3,772
3,282
4,946
9,026
NNING AND
|T-TO.KNOW
Cumulative
6,939
10,711
13,993
18,939
27,965
•AD calls answered by the Call Management System or the Document Retrieval Line - The documents featured were
the "Green Advertising Claims Brochure," The Catalog of Hazardous and Solid Waste Pubttcations," "Statement on
Incineration." "Hazardous Debris Case-by-Case Variance Notice," "Criteria for Solid Waste Disposal Facilities," "Safer
Disposal for Solid Waste," and the "Proposed Regulations Regarding Municipal Solid Waste Landfills."
19
-------
CaN Analyses
June 1993
CALLS ANSWERED BY TYPE
June Daily Volume*
8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30
Year to Date*
January
February
March
April
May
June
Questions
Month
9,392
11,213
10,771
10,697
10.857
16,286
Cumulative
20,805
31,376
42.073
52.930
69,216
January
February
March
April
May
June
Documents
Month
3,652
3,431
4,706
4,034
4,124
4,807
Cumulative
7.083
11,789
15,823
19,947
24,754
January
February
March
April
May
June
g%~* — •-
neterrr
Month
1,339
1,679
1.378
1,088
893
801
H*
Cumulative
3,018
4,396
5.484
6,377
7,178
* All calls answered by die Call Management System or the Message Retrieval Line. A single call may include multiple
questions combined with document requests and referrals.
20
-------
June 1993
CaM Analyses
CALLS ANSWERED BY PROGRAM AREA
June 1993*
*Bas«d on 21,093 requests and excludes 801 referrals made from both Hotlines. Includes the Message Retrieval
Line.
Year to Date*
January
February
March
April
May
June
RCRA
Month
63%
(8,230)
60%
(8.805)
58%
(9.043)
61%
(8,945)
-53%
(7:992)
43%
(9,129)
Cumulative
62%
(17.035)
60%
(26.078)
60%
(35,023)
59%
(43.015)
56%
(52,144)
Superfund
Month
15%
(1.999)
11%
(1.570)
14%
(2.150)
13%
(1348)
11%
(1.583)
10%
(2,020)
Cumulative
13%
(3.569)
13%
(5.719)
13%
(7,567)
13%
(9.150)
12%
(11,170)
OUST
Month
4%
(502)
3%
(484)
4%
(623)
3%
(506)
3%
(415)
2%
(456)
Cumulative
3%
(986)
4%
(1.609)
4%
(2,115)
3%
(2.530)
3%
(2.986)
EMMfQMtcy PunninQ •
CocnnHJnft
Month
18%
(2,313)
26%
(3.785)
24%
(3.661)
23%
(3,432)
33%
(4.991)
45%
(9.488)
ninni*w^f\now
Cumulative
22%
16.0981
23%
(9.759)
23%
(13.191)
25%
(18,182)
29%
(27,670)
21
-------
CaN Analyses
June 1993
CALLER PROFILE
RCRA/SF/OUST Hotline
Regulated Community 7,627
Citizens 651
State & Local Gov't/Native American 396
Federal Agencies 90
Educational Institutions 129
EPA 140
Other 19
Media 28
Interest Groups 41
Congress 5
Referrals 525
International 16
Document Retrieval Line* 1,310
TOTAL
10,977
State/Local Govt/
Native American
4%
Federal Agencies
1%
Regulated
Community
79%
' Mb caBcr profile dau •vailabte.
22
-------
June 1993
CaN Analyses
Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Hotline
Manufacturer
Food/Tobacco 478
Textiles 118
Apparel 58
Lumber & Wood 111
Furniture 146
Paper 190
Printing & Publishing 132
Chemicals 1,107
Petroleum & Coal 219
Rubber and Plastics 321
Leather 32
Stone, Clay & Glass 172
Primary Metals 361
Fabricated Metals 696
Machinery (Excluding Electrical) 205
Electrical&Electronic Equipment 336
Transportation Equipment 261
Instruments 124
Misc. Manufacturing 194
Not Able to Determine 115
Subtotal 5,376
Consultants/Engineers
Attorneys
Citizens
All Others
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Agencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Fanners
Federal Agencies
Union/Labor
Media/Press
Distributors
Native Americans
Laboratories
Misc.
Referrals
International
TOTAL
1,633
435
272
63
83
84
8
29
94
15
78
38
29
18
77
2
39
62
7
75
217
276
16
9,026
All Others
12%
Consultants/
Engineers *
19%
23
-------
CaN Analyses
June 1993
HOTLINE TOPICS
RCRA
Special Wastes
Ash 9
Mining Wastes, Bevill 27
Medical Wastes 108
Oil and Gas 9
Subtitle C (General) 343
Hazardous Waste Id. (General) 1,438'
Toxicity Characteristic 236
Wood Preserving 18
Listing of Used Oil 81
Huff 5
Radioactive Mixed Waste 42
Delisting Petitions 45
Hazardous Waste Recycling 210
Generators 639'
Small Quantity Generators 253
Transportation/Transporters 115
TSDFs General 268
TSDFs Siting Facilities 16
TSDFs Capacity 131"
TSDFs Treatment 1731
TSDFs Burning 146
TSDFs Storage 1471
TSDFs Disposal 95
Land Disposal Restrictions 5791
Permits and Permitting 186
Corrective Action 214
Financial Liability/Enforcement 112
Test Methods 130
Health Effects 25
Waste MinTPollution Prevention 103
State Programs 134
Hazardous Waste Data 97
Household Hazardous Waste 194
Subtitle D (General) 653U
Siting Facilities 34
Combustion 341"
Industrial Waste 10
Composting 6
Source Reduction/Poll. Prev. 45s
Grants & Financing 6
Procurement (General) 21
Building Insulation 3
Cement & Products with Fly Ash 4
Paper & Paper Products
Re-refined Lubricating Oil
Retread Tires
Solid Waste Recycling (General)
Aluminum
Batteries
Glass
Paper
Plastics
Tires
Used Oil
Markets (General)
Aluminum
Batteries
Compost
Glass
Paper
Plastics
Tires
Used Oil
RCRA General
TOTAL
* Includes 2,471 RCRA document requests.
12
5
5
2331
7
35
6
8
17
14
225
6
3
8
0
8
2
3
15
9
1,026s
9,129*
SUPERFUND
General/Misc.
Access & Information Gathering
Administrative Record
ARARs
CERCLIS
Citizen Suits
Claims Against Fund
Clean-Up Costs
Qean-Up Standards
Community Relations
Contract Lab Program (CLP)
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts
Definitions
Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Hazardous Substances
HRS
206
27
12
76
104
8
17
25
46
18
22
5
15
22
64
22
88
45
1 Hot topics for this Booth.
Includes 59 document retrieval* for the "Hazardous Debrfc Ca*e-»j-Case Variance Notice"
Includes 303 requests for "Criteria lor Sottd Waste Disposal Facilities" awl "Safer Disposal for SoHd Waste,"
IS requests tor the "Proposed Regulations Regarding Municipal Solid Waste Laodfflk."
'Includes 322 docuatent retrievals lor the "Statement on Incineration"
Includes 33 document retrievals for the "Green Advertising Claims Brochure"
Includes 578 document retrievals for the "Catalog of Hazardous and SoUd Waste PubUcations"
>«ifuUt«H - th, •••«Hn« at «n tf^Oamm m^iv«d hy th» HotDn* A single call may result in multiple
24
-------
June 1993
Call Analyses
Liability 91
Local Gov't Reimbursement 17
Natural Resource Damages 3
NCP 22
Notification 51
NPL 1961
Off Site Policy 26
OSHA 6
PA/SI 29
PRPs 29
RD/RA 14
Reauthorization 13
Remedial 64
Removal 49
RI/FS 47
Risk Assess./Health Effects 61
ROD 44
RQ 1711
SACM 26
Settlements 38
SITE Program 23
State Participation 4
State Program 15
TAGs 7
Taxes 11
Tide m/Right-to-Know 87
Special Topics
Oil Pollution Act 26
SPCC Regulations 28
TOTAL 2,020*
*
Includes 581 Superfund document requests.
OUST
General/Misc. 92
Applicability/Definitions 63
Regulated Substances 22
Standards for New Tank Systems 15
Tank Standards and Upgrading 19
Operating Requirements 13
Release Detection 50
Release Reporting & Investigation 10
Corrective Action for USTs 27
Out-of-Service/Closure 43
Financial Responsibility 53
State Programs 19
Liability/Enforcement 16
LUST Trust Fund 14
TOTAL ' 456*
Includes 148 OUST document requests.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW
Tide m General 202
§301-3 Emergency Planning
General 46
SERCs/LEPC 20
Notification 10
Mixtures 8
Extremely Hazardous Substances 18
fielisting EHS 2
Exemptions 3
§304:
General 40
Notification Requirements 44
Reportable Quantities 42
RQs vs. TPQs 15
Transportation 0
Exemptions 4
§311/312:
General 75
MSDS Reporting Requirements 34
Tier l/U Regulations 88
Thresholds 27
OSHA Expansion 1
Hazard Categories 3
Mixtures 0
Exemptions •- 23
§313:
General 586
Form R 5069
Thresholds 750
Phase I 486
Phase H 198
Phase ffl 15
Pollution Prevention 538
NONs/NOTEs 125
Petitions 103
Health Effects 9
Database 131
Exemptions 479
Training:
General 2
§305 Training Grants 0
§305 Emergency Systems Review 0
§ 126 (SARA) Training Regulations 1
1 Hot topics for thfc north.
• Topics are calculated as them
•raUple questions.
atioa of all questions received by the Hotline. A single call may result in
25
-------
Ca* Analyses June 1993
General: Trade Secrets 12
CEPP Interim Guide 0 Enforcement 264
Chemical Profile 4 Liability 9
NRT-1 0
Hazard Analysis 1 TOTAL 9,48?
Risk Communication 0
Title HI Workshops 0 Includes 1,607 Emergency Planning Community
Information Management 0 Right-To-Know document requests.
Prevention ARIP 0
Other 1 TOTAL HOTLINE QUESTIONS,
DOCUMENT REQUESTS AND
REFERRALS:
21394
• Topics are calculated as the summation of all questions received by fee Hotline. A single cafl may result in multiple
26
-------
LIST OF ADDRESSEES:
EdAbrams,OS-332
Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7
Kate Anderson, OS-520
Irene Atney-Yurdin, DOE- NY
Beth Behrens, EPA-NEIC
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Rick Brandes, OS-330
Karen Brown, A-149C
Nancy Browne, OS-520
Kathy Bruneske, OS-305
Karen Burgan, OS-110
Heather Bums, Hotline
Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2
Sabrina Callihan, DOE
Sonia Chambers, EPA-Reg. 5
Richard Clarizio, EPA-Reg. 5
Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9
Bill Cosgrove, EPA-Reg. 4
Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama
Becky Cuthbertson, OS-320W
Jeffery Denit, OS-300
Director, RED, LE-134S
Dave Eberly, 53-03W
Chris Elias, CA DepL of Health
Terry Escarda, CA DepL of Health
John Ferris, OS-120
Austine Frawley, EPA-Reg. 1
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn.
Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX
Alan Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR
Kristin Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8
John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2
Cheryl Graham, LE-132S
Rich Guimond, OS-100
Beth Hall, WH-550E
Jim Hayden, DEC-Alaska
Betty Hollowell, DOE-TX
Mark Horwitz, Reg. 5
Hinton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5
Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4
Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10
Tom Jacobs, EPA-Reg. 5
Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7
Tim Jones, OS-301
Gary Jonesi, LE-134S
Ron Josephson, OS-333
Miles Kahn, 6603-J
Robert Kayser, OS-333
Jeff Kelly, OS-520
Carolyn Kenmore, 5203-G
PaulKewin,CA-EPA
Mitch Kidwell, OS-332
Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA
William Kline, OS-322W
Robert Knox,OS-130
Walter Kovalick, OS-110
Joan Lee, LA DEQ
Henry Longest, OS-100
JimLoomis, FLERC
Julia Lebee, EPA-Reg. 4
Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5
Andrea McLaughlin, OS-5203G
Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7
Tami McNamara, TS-779
Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3
Kim Mercer, EPA-Reg. 9
Margaret Meares, EPA-Reg. 4
Charlotte Mooney, OS-332
Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7
Tamara Mount, Hotline
Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6
Roger Nelson, TS-794
Susan OTCeefe, LE-134S
Susan Offerdal, OFFE
ChaePak, EPA-Reg. 10
Robert Pagett, Kentucky
Wendy Porman, DOI
Myra Perez, EPA-Houston
Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3
Dan Powell, OS-HOW
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9
John Ramirez, DOE
JohnRiley,OS-210
Barbara Roth, OS-305
Debbie Rutherford, OS-420WF
William Sanjour, OS-330
Sam Sasnett, TS-779
Tim Schoepke, TS-793
Karen Shanahan, OS-120
Jay Stlberman, US Coast Guard
Captain Smyser, Airforce
Stergios Spanos, NH DES
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Kathie Stein, LE-134S
Charles Stevens, EPA-Reg. 8
Heather Stockard, DEC-Alaska
Kathy Teemer, Hotline
Beverly Thomas, OS-420WF
Jim Thompson, OS-520
Linda Thompson, LE-134S
Steve Toipk, EPA-Juneau, AK
Harriett Tregoning, PM-220
Betti VanEpps, 5201-G
Carie VanHook, OS-305
David Van Slyke,LE-134S
Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8
David Watson, PM-214F
Howard Wilson, PM-273
Denise Wright, OS -332
Mia Zmud, OS-301
OSW Division Directors
OSW Deputy Division Directors
OSW Branch Chiefs
Hazardous Waste Management Division Directors,
Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X ,
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
------- |