-------
1-r
.5--
.1 -.
-J .05
\
13
z
o
cc
h-
z
u
z
o
u
V
o:
D
U
cc
HI
.01 --
.005--
.001 -
.0005--
.0001
EPA DRINKING WATER .STANDAf D
6ELOW ACCURATE QUAMT J P"ICAT ItIN
LEVEL
D
SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 4 SITE 5 SITE 6 SITE 7 SITE 8
FIGURE 17
- 73
-------
300-
100-
50-
10-
_l
\
u
z
1 5'
Z
o
hH
1
p*
<
Cf.
i_
r~
z
LU
U
Z
° 1
0 1-
^^
CD
Q.
w 0.5-
D
<
U
_l
0.1-
0^>(T
Ob
0.01 -
f\ t*\f\CZ _
rrrr
r*\
*
C3
'"'"
'
M*V
*
*
1
f
4s
5
*
P^s
W*
MM
V
Kb
TT1
-Ul
LEVEU
*
Tf-i
#
ft
ftp*
*
*
*
-fc
^
*
1'
r^
w*
-T
« !
*
V
-,
*VlV
4
SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE 3 SITE 4 SITE 5 SI iTT GI TE" 7 SITE 3
FIGURE 18
74
-------
OO
1
1
OO
UJ
cc
_J
<
o
1 t
1
>-
_l
-
&.
<£.
\
OO
co
r^
UJ
1
CO
=t
1
in
4_)
c
0)
3
4-*
r
f-J
(/)
c
0
(_5
00
s_
C_)
-a
o
rO
O
^ x
i
cn
^^.^
I/)
r-^
QJ
>
QJ
i
UD
«^-
=d-
"d-
CM
-
'*
CM
S-
E QJ
3 +>
..E *
>- -I ^
0 X
ro CJ)
EEC
3 T-
E -0 ^
r- O) C
x -a - to
(O C S- T3
E OJ T3 S-
§rO
00 -0
^c. c:
OOQ.ro
JO QJ LO 4->
^f" f » (/%
^J. >» ' VI
t--
LT>
CM
CO
CO
t^
CO
,
i
CO
(/)
rjj oj
4-> >
ro QJ
S_ r
3
(_) C
u o
ro !-
4->
5 0
O QJ
r -4-J
O) (!)
fyt -Q
,__ f
IT) CO ^ CO
un r^ ro «=f
co ur> CM
r
LT) O «d"
CM
»d- co UD
in en 10
r
CO i UD
i
r O **
UO CTl CO
CO tD
r O LO r
CM
r «* r
r-^ LO
CM r Lf> i i
i i
«d- «3- CO r
r CO in
CM <£> i
co o r-^
r O
0 0
Or O O
. o o o
O r- O O O
O O O t
1 O O O r
1 r Or- 1 +
r 1 Or 1 O
O i 1 i 1 O O
O O r 1 O O O
OOOi 1 OOOO
O O O O 0
01
0
CM
O1
i
0
CM
CTi
CM
CT>
CM
0
CO
0
CM
0
CM
CTi
CTi
O
CO
CTl
cr>
CM
O
CO
o
CO
in
CM
CM
CM
0
CM
<+-
O
S_
O)
.0
E
3
C (/>
O)
ro Q.
+-> E
O ro
t ,n
r^~ vt
75
-------
CO
co
1
CO
LU
OL
_J
o
1 1
1
1
'Z.
_l
_J
LU
3
D:
I i i
i
g
^^
)
o
o:
tD
LU
r
i i
CO
U.
O
O_
LU
LU
n
U-
O
§
IF
ID
CO
B
^
LU
|
CO
1
(/
c:
a
r
4-3
to
O
0
3,
oa
2:
Q.
O)
s_
4-*
CO
fd
(J
O)
r
'o
0
Q
O
O
O
O
O
CO
I
o
^
r
CO
o
^^
Z.
c.
a.
^
CD
^:
VI)
U-
tJ>
S-
0
73
O
fO
^-^
r
^^
CD
£
N^^*
(/)
r
ai
o :r c
O O Q- ro
-a w co 4-»
a: j- ZD to
CM
CM
CM
OO
*
o
p~
^*
oi e
4J O
ro -I-
S- «->
3 ro
(J (J
O) 3
O)
r r~~
ro r*>
+-> E
O ro
1 in
76
-------
A lesser number of infractions occurred in the deep off-
site groundwater wells. Four of the eight sites exceeded
allowable levels on at least two constituents. Samples
obtained at Site 2 exceeded five water quality tolerances
(chloride, cadmium, iron, mercury, and lead). Site 6 exceeded
the iron, mercury, and lead standards. Sites 7 and 8 both
exceeded the iron and lead standard.
Iron appeared the most times in concentrations in excess
of EPA Drinking Water Standards. Twenty-four of 30 shallow
and 11 of 16 deep off-site groundwater sample results exceeded the
the iron standard.
Lead emerged as the second most prevalent constituent
monitored for which EPA Drinking Water Standards had been
exceeded. Fourteen out of 30 shallow groundwater samples and
eight of 16 deep off-site groundwater sample results violated
maximum acceptable standards for lead.
Mercury in excess of EPA standards appeared four times
in the shallow off-site groundwater and three times in the
deep off-site groundwater.
In the shallow off-site groundwater, cadmium appeared
twice, copper once, and sulfate six times above accepted
limits. In the deep off-site groundwater, cadmium appeared
once and chloride four times.
Using the EPA Drinking Water Standards as a measure of
degradation of off-site groundwaters, it must be concluded
that in the eight sites surveyed, there had been appreciable
groundwater quality degradation beyond the limits of the
immediate disposal area. Subsequent studies will be necessary
to determine the area! extent of contamination which has
occurred and to estimate the potential for future contamination.
Testing of statistical significance of data was not
attempted because of the limited data, masking by seasonal
variation, and limited degree to which one case study site
could be reasonably compared to another.
77
-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alkin, E.W., W.H. Benton, and W.F. Hill, Enteric Viruses in
Ground and Surface Water: A Review of Their Occurrence and
Survival. 13th Water Quality Conference, 59, University
of Illionis, 1971 .
Allen, M.J. and S.M. Morrison. Bacterial Movement through
Fractured Bedrock. Ground Water, 11:2,6, 1973.
Baars, J.K. Travel of Pollution and Purification En Route,
In Sandy Soils. Bulletin World Health Organization, 16:
727-747, April 1975.
Bloom, H.H., W.N. Mack, and W.L. Mailman. Enteric Viruses
and Salmonellae Isolations; II: Media Comparison for
Salmonellae. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 30:1455,
1958.
Drewry, W.A. and R. Eliassen. Virus Movement in Ground-
water. JWPCF, 4£:R257-R271, August 1968.
Eliassen, R. Studies on the Movement of Viruses with
Groundwater. Water Quality Control Research Laboratory,
Stanford University, 1967.
Engelbrecht, R.S., e_t_ ajL Biological Properties of Sani-
tary Landfill Leachate. Virus Survival in Water and Waste
Water Systems, Malina and Sagik, eds. Water Resources
Symposium #7, 1974. pp 201-217.
Grigoryeva. L.V., G.I. Korchak, and T.V. Bey. Survival of
Bacteria and Viruses in Sewage Sludges, Microbiolog. Zh.,
3J_:659, 1969.
Krone, R.B. The Movement of Disease Producing Organisms
through Soils. Proceedings of the Symposium on Municipal
Sewage Effluent for Irrigation, Louisiana Polytechnic
Institute, July 30, 1968.
Krone, R.B., G.T. Orlab, and C. Hodgkinson. Movement of
Coliform Bacteria through Porous Media. Sewage and In-
dustrial Wastes, 30:1-13, January 1968.
Lund, E. Observations on the Virus Binding Capacity of
Sludge. 5th International Conference on Water Pollution
Research, San Francisco, California, 1970.
78
-------
Mailman, W.L. and W. Litsky. Survival of Selected Enteric
Organisms in Various Types of Soil. American Journal Public
Health , 4_1_:38, 1951 .
Mailman, W.L. and W.M. Mack. Biological Contamination of
Groundwater. U.S. Public Health Service Technical Report,
W61-5, 1961. pp 35-43.
Molina, A.J.E., O.C. Braids, and T.D. Hinesly. Observations
on Bactericidal Properties of Digested Sludge. Environ-
mental Science and Technology, i5_:448-450, 1972.
Robeck, G.G. Microbial Problems in Groundwater. Ground-
Water, 1 (3):33-35, May-June 1969.
Romero, J.C. The Movement of Bacteria and Viruses through
Porous Media. Ground Water, £ (37), 1970.
Rudolfs, W., L.L. Falk, and R.A. Ragotzkie. Literature on
the Occurrence and Survival of Enteric, Pathogenic, and
Relative Organisms in Soil, Water, Sewage, and Sludges,
and on Vegetation; I: Bacterial and Virus Diseases.
Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 2_2_:1261, 1950.
Broadbent, F.E. and G.R. Bradford. Cation Exchange Groups
in Soil Organic Fraction. Soil Science, ^4_:447-457, 1952.
Degradation of Wastewater Organics in Soil. JWPCF, 41_
(5):808-813, 1969.
Howath, R.S. Microbial Co-metabolism and the Degradation
of Organic Compounds in Nature. Bacteriology Review,
36_:146-155, 1972.
Miller, R.H. The Microbiology of Sewage Sludge Decomposi-
tion in Soil. Unpublished Report. Department of Agronomy,
Ohio State University, 1972.
Mitchell, J. The Origin, Nature, and Importance.of Soil
Organic Constituents Having Base Exchange Properties.
Journal American Society Agronomy, 2£:256-275, 1932.
Stevenson, F.J. and M.S. Ardakani. Organic Matter Re-
actions Involving Micronutrients in Soils. In: Micro-
nutrients in Agriculture, 1972.
Thomas, R.E. and T.W. Bendixen. Degradation of Wastewater
Organics in Soil. JWPCF, 41:808-813, 1969.
79
-------
Berrow, M.L. and J. Webber. Trace Elements in Sewage
Sludge. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture, 23:93-100,
1972.
Bradford, G.R., P.I. Bair, and V. Hunsaker. Trace and
Major Elements of Soil Saturation Extracts. Soil Science
J_l_2:225-230, 1971.
Hem, John D. Chemistry and Occurrence of Cadmium and Zinc
in Water and Groundwater. Water Resources Research,
i8(3):661-679, 1972.
Jenkins, S.D., D.G. Keight, and A. Ewins. The Solubility
of Heavy Metal Hydroxides in Water, Sewage, and Sewage
Sludge - II. International Journal of Air and Water
Pollution, 8^:679-693, 1964.
Jenkins, S.H. , D.G. Keight, and J.S. Cooper. The Solu-
bility of Heavy Metal Hydroxides in Water, Sewage and Sew-
age Sludge - III. International Journal of Air and Water
Pollution, 8^:695-703, 1964.
Jurinak, J.J. and J. Santi11an-Medrano. The Chemistry and
Transport of Lead and Cadmium in Soils. Research Reoort 18,
Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University,
Logan, Utah, June 1974.
Kubota, Joe and W.H. Allaway. Geographic Distribution of
Trace Elements Problems. In : Micronutrients in Agri-
culture, 1972.
Lagerwerff, J.W. Heavy Metal Contamination of Soil. Agri-
culture and the Quality of Our Environment. N.C. Brady, Ed.
Norwood, Mass., Plimpton Press, 1967. pp. 343-359.
Lagerwerff, J.V. Lead, Mercury, and Cadmium as Contaminants.
In; Micronutrients in Agriculture, 1972.
Leeper, G.W. Reactions of Heavy Metals with Soils with
Special Regard to Their Application in Sewage Wastes.
Contract No. DACW 73-73-C-0026, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
November 1972.
Lieber", M. and W.F. Welsch. Contamination of Ground Water
by Cadmium. JAWWA, 4J>:541, 1954.
Martin, R. Determination of Heavy Metals in Digested
Sewage Sludge, Springfield, Missouri, 1975.
80
-------
Norvell, W.A. Equilibria of Metal Chelates in Soil Solu-
tion. In: Micronutrients in Agriculture, 1972,
Purves, David. Consequences of Trace-Element Contamination
of Soils. Environmental Pollution, 3_:l7-24, 1972.
Wentink, G.R. and J.E. Etzel. Removal of Metal Ions by
Soil. JWPCF, 44_ (8):1561-1574, 1972.
Fredrick, L.R. The Formation of Nitrate from Ammonium
Nitrogen in Soils; I: The Effect of Temperature. Soil
Science Society of America Proceedings, 2£:496-500, 1956.
Lance, J.C. Nitrogen Removal by Soil Mechanisms. JWPCF,
444-7)-.1352-1 361 , July 1972.
Pratt, P.F., W.W. Jones, and V.E. Hunsaker. Nitrate in
Deep Soil Profiles in Relation to Fertilizer Rates and
Leaching Volume. Journal Evni ronmental Quality, 1_:97-102,
1972.
Reichman, G.A., D.L. Grunes, and F.G. Viets, Effect of
Soil Moisture on Ammonification and Nitrification in Two
Northern Plains States. Soil Science Society of America
Proceedings, .30:363-366, 1966.
Sepp, E. Nitrogen Cycle in Groundwater. Bureau of Sani-
tary Engineering, California State Department of Public
Health, Berkeley, California, 1970.
Viets, F.G., Jr., and R.H. Hageman. Factors Affecting the
Accumulation of Nitrate in Soils, Water, and Plants.
Agriculture Handbook No. 413, ARS, U.S.D.A. , Washington,
D.C. 1971.
Mathur, R.P., and N.S. Grewal. Underground Travel of
Pollutants. In: Advances in Water Pollution Research.
New York, Pergamon Press, June 1972. pp 159-166.
Wischmeier, W.H. and J.V. Mannering. Effects of Organic
Matter Content of the Soil on Infiltration. Journal Soil
Water Conservation, 2£:150-152, 1965.
»
Molina, A.J.E., et_ a_l_. Division S-3-Soil Microbiology and
Bio-chemistry-Aeration-Induced Changes in Liquid Digested
Sewage Sludge. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings,
.35:60-63 , 1971 .
Aylmore, L.A.G., Mesbahul Karim, and J.P. Quirk. Adsorption
and Desorption of Sulfate Ions by Soil Constituents.
Soil Science, 103(1 ) : 10-15 , 1967.
81
-------
Barrow, N.J. Comparison of the Adsorption of Molybdate,
Sulfate, and Phosphate by Soils. Soil Science , 109:282-
288, 1970.
Barrow, N.J. Studies on the Adsorption of Sulfate by Soils.
Soil Science l_04:342-349, 1967.
Bornemisza, E. and R. Llanos. Sulfate Movement, Adsorption,
and Desorption in Three Costa Rican Soils. Proceedings of
the Soil Science Society of America, 3Jj356-360, 1967.
Chao, Tsun Tien, M.E. Harward, and S.C. Fang. Adsorption
and Desorption Phenomena of Sulfate Ions in Soils. Proceed-
ings of the Soil Science Society of America, £6^:234-237, 1962
Chao, Tsun Tien, M.E. Harward, and S.C. Fang. Cationic
Effects on Sulfate Adsorption by Soils. Proceedings of the
Soil Science Society of America, 27_:35-38, 1963,
deVilliers, J.M. and M.L. Jackson. Cation Exchange Capa-
city Variations with pH in Soil Clays. Proceedings of the
Soil Science Society of America, 3J_:473-476, 1967.
Eriksson, E. Cation-Exchange Equilibria on Clay Minerals.
Soil Science, 7^:103-113, 152.
Gieseking, J.E. and Hans Jenny. Behavior of Polyvalent
Cations in Base Exchange. Soil Science, 42^:273-280, 1936.
Krishnamoorthy, C. and R. Overstreet. An Experimental
Evaluation of Ion-Exchange Relationships. Soil Science,
69>:41-53, 1950.
Anderson, M.S. Comparative Analyses of Sewage Sludge.
Sewage And Industrial Wastes, 2^8:132-135, 1956.
Parizek, R.R. and D. Langmuir. Management of Leachates
from Sanitary Landfills. Pennsylvania Geology Survey
Bulletin, 1971.
Sludge Handling and Disposal; Phase I: State of the Arts.
Metro Sewer Board of Twin Cities Area, November 15, 1972.
82
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
GAS PROBE AND MONITORING WELL PLACEMENT PROCEDURE
I. In-Refuse Well
A. The monitoring well in the landfill will be drilled
to the groundwater table. Figure 1 shows a typical
installation. The following samples will be taken at
the time of drilling this well:
1. Core sample of soil cover material for permea-
bility determination.
2. Two (2) samples of landfill material for deter-
mination of moisture content.
3. Three (3) soil cores spaced over the distance
between the landfill bottom and the groundwater
table for determination of leachate attenuation
by soi1.
A core auger or bucket rig is most desirable for
drilling holes in refuse. An air rotary drill may
be used but is subject to fouling in refuse.
Experience has indicated that for our typical 4-
in diameter monitoring well, the well bore diameter
should be a minimum of 6 in and preferably 8 in or
greater. During the drilling, refuse is pulled loose
and protrudes into the hole. This leads to diffi-
culties during the placement of the gas probes attached
to the outside of the well casing and in backfilling.
Carefully construct a soil boring log of the mater-
ial brought to the surface during the well drilling
operati on.
B. Core Sample of Cover Soil. After the location
of the well has been determined on the site and
preferably before the well driller arrives, take a
core sample of the cover soil material for deter-
mination of permeability. Refer to Field Sampling
Instruction Manual for detailed instructions
orT obt a i ni n g the samp 1 e .
C. Moisture Content Samples of Refuse. Two refuse
samples will be taken for determination of moisture
content from each hole at the one-third and two-
third overall landfill depth, respectively.
Approximately one shovelful of refuse and/or
sludge material will be placed in a plastic bag
84
-------
GAS
SAMPLE
SOIL
COVER
SHALLOW
GAS PROBE
APPROX. 3-5 FT
(0.9 TO 1.5M) BELOW
SURFACE
6 IN (15 CM)
NOMINAL /
DIA. BORE HOLE
DEEP GAS PROBE
APPROX. 3-5 FT
(0.9 TO 1.5M)
BOTTOM OF REFUSE-
2 FT
(0.6M)
MINIMUM OF 2 FT
BACKFILL WITH
SOIL OR CONCRETE-
IT
SOIL
BACKFILL
GRAVEL
BACKFILL
CAP
LEACHATE SAMPLE
SURFACE OF LANDFILL
..
ftr* -.-X -y* *t. vv-'s
CONCRETE SEAL
4 IN (10 CM)
PVC PIPE TO EXTEND
MINIMUM OF 2 FT (0.6M)
ABOVE SURFACE
C1 *>NDFILLED REFUSE J
AND/OR SLUDGE ^
CLAY OR
CONCRETE
PLUG
r
WELL
SCREEN
SECTION
LEGEND
NOT TO SCALE
§ SOIL CORE SAMPLE
At REFUSE/SLUDGE
MOISTURE SAMPLE
| SOIL COVER
PERMEABILITY SAMPLE
5?
GROUNDWATER
FIGURE 1
TYPICAL SAMPLING WELL DETAILS
(IN-REFUSE WELL)
85
-------
and sealed. The bag containing the sample will be
placed in a second plastic bag and again sealed.
This double bagging is to minimize moisture
loss .
D. Soil Below Landfill. Upon reaching the bottom
of the landfill (when the auger brings up mostly
soil), take a soil or core sample (approximately
a shovelful) and place in a sterile plastic speci-
men bag. Label and place in a second bag.
Two additional samples will be taken following the
same procedure, one halfway between the landfill
bottom and the groundwater, and the other at
groundwater level. Since the exact distance to
groundwater may not be known, several samples around
the presumed mid-depth may need to be obtained and
retained until the midpoint location is established.
II. Plume Wells
Two wells will be placed in the presumed groundwater down-
gradient direction from the in-refuse well described
above. These wells should not penetrate any refuse,
and should be approximately 100 ft from the in-refuse
wel1 i f practical.
One well will penetrate the groundwater table elevation
to a depth of 2 ft. This well will be termed the
shallow well. The second well will penetrate the
groundwater table elevation to a depth of about 20 ft
(site conditions permitting). This well will be termed
the deep well. Figure 2 illustrates typical construc-
tion details for each well.
86
-------
20 FT
(6.1M)
2 FT
(0.6M )
J_
CAP.
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE
SEAL -""
4 IN (10 CM)
PVC PIPE, TO EXTEND
MINIMUM OF 2 FT
ABOVE SURFACE
.-SOIL
-GRAVEL/NATIVE
MATERIAL BACKFILL
GROUNDWATER
__
E j.
END
0.6M)
*2TT
(0. 6M)
t
-*-r
f£f
ss
i!
it
II
i
5-S51
AJ*
K,
? /W
WELL
SCREEN
SECTION
SHALLOW WELL
NOT TO SCALE
WELL
SCREEN
SECTION
DEEP WELL
FIGURE 2
TYPICAL SAMPLING WELL DETAILS
(DOWNSTREAM PLUME WELLS)
87
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
FIELD SAMPLING INSTRUCTION MANUAL
The objective of field sampling is to obtain representative
leachate, groundwater, gas, sludge, and mixed refuse-sludge
samples from each of the case study sites. The accuracy
and care taken during sampling cannot be overemphasized.
An accurate analysis is directly dependent upon the care
taken by field personnel in drawing and shipping the requi-
site samples.
This manual is intended to provide field personnel with a
guide to the precise procedures to be employed as well as
alternative procedures, where applicable, for coping with
anticipated problems.
I. S a m p 1 i ng Code Con v e n t i p n
A. Labeling
The following information should appear on each
sample container. (See Figures 1 and 2.)
1. Date: Month and day only, use number for
months .
2. Sample sequence number: Each sample will be
given a sequence number starting with 1 for
the first sample. Consecutive numbers will
be assigned for additional samples taken from
each site. For example, the second leachate
sample taken will be assigned the number "2."
3. Project code: This five-digit code uniquely
identifies this specific project, i.e.,
SCS-34.
4. Location code: Sample site location codes
are taken from the commercial airport nearest
to the case study site.
5. Sample hole designation (for gas sampling):
Each gas probe hole will be assigned a reference
number.
6. Probe Depth (for gas sampling):
A = shallow probe
B = deep probe
7. Sample hole designation (for groundwater sampling)
A = shallow we!1
B = deep well
90
-------
SAMPLE
DATE
SAMPLE-
SEQUENCE
NUMBER
PROJECT
CODE
LOCATION
CODE
OFF-SITE WELL
DESIGNATION
FIGURE 1
LEACHATE SAMPLE
CONTAINER LABELING
91
-------
SAMPLE
DATE
SAMPLE
SEQUENCE
NUMBER
PROJECT
CODE
LOCATION
CODE
HOLE
DEPTH
HOLE
LOCATION
FIGURE 2
SAMPLE CONTAINER LABELING
FOR GAS SAMPLE BOTTLES
92
-------
B. Leachate and Groundwater
Both sides of the sample bottles should be labeled
with a waterproof marking pen. Mark each container
in LARGE NEAT BLOCK LETTERS as in Figure 1. Use
dashes (not slashes) to separate items. On ground-
water sample containers for off-site wells, be sure
to designate which well is being sampled (A for
deep, B for shallow).
C. Gas Bottle Marking
Carefully place two strips of masking tape on the
gas sample bottle as shown in Figure 2. Label the
tape as per the above-mentioned procedure. Do not
use waterproof pens directly on glass because the
markings are almost Impossible to remove.
D. Soil and refuse samples will be placed in polyeth-
elene bags. Prior to sampling, the bag should be
marked (with waterproof pens) with appropriate
sample codes. All samples are to be double bagged
and sealed to prevent moisture loss.
93
-------
11. Leachate and Groundwater Sampling Procedure
A leachate sample will be obtained from the in-refuse
well at each site. A groundwater sample will be
obtained from each off-site well at each site.
A. Materials Required
1. One copy Field Sampling Instr u c t ion Manual
2. Styrofoam-lined corrugated shipping cartons
3. Adequate supply of plastic 2-liter bottles and
lids*
4. Sampling unit with two sample bottles (Figure
3)
5. One thermometer with a range of 0 to 150°C
6. Corning Model 3 pH meter (portable)
7. One plastic funnel
8. Black waterproof marking pens
9. Four packs minimum of "blue ice" for shipping.
(The "blue ice" should be frozen prior to
obtaining the leachate samples. Use motel
ice machine or restaurant freezer).
10. Several rolls of fiber packing tape or duck
tape
11. Notebook for field notes
12. Master list of sample sequence numbers and
sampling dates by site
* These containers are prepared for field use as follows:
The polyethylene containers are first washed with hot tap
water, cooled and rinsed with AA grade 1:1 Nitric and Hydro-
chloric Acid. Cold tap water is used to flush the acid re-
mains from the bottles and finally, each bottle is rinsed
several times with double-distilled deionized water. Caps
are treated in a similar fashion. The bottles are then
capped tightly and prepared for shipment to the field.
94
-------
WELL
WEIGHTED
BOTTLE
SAMPLE
BOTTLE
USE NEW SAMPLE BOTTLE
AT EACH WELL
FIGURE 3
SAMPLING UNIT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES
95
-------
13. One styrofoam ice chest
B. Field Sampling
Leachate and groundwater samples will be obtained
using careful grab sample techniques to insure
representative sampling. The sample sequence
shall be as follows: deep off-site well, shallow
off-site well, and in-refuse well.
1. Carefully label the outside of 2-liter bottles
with the appropriate identifying codes, dates,
etc., using a black waterproof marking pen (see
Fi gure 1 ).
2. Place sampling bottle firmly attached to
weighted bottle (see Figure 3) in well casing
and lower to water level of well and submerse
both bottles. When the sample container is
filled, pull the container back to the surface
and transfer sample to appropriate 2-liter
bottle. Repeat procedure until the bottle is
90 percent filled. Record water temperature and
pH and cap the sample bottle tightly.
3. After capping, place the 2-liter bottle in an
ice water bath. Allow the sample temperature
to equilibrate at 3-4°C (usually 2 to 3 hours).
4. Repeat the above procedure at the remaining
two wells after replacing the sample bottle
on the sampling unit.
C. Shipment of Leachate and Groundwater Samples
All samples are to be sent to the SCS - Long Beach
Office by air freight as soon as practical after
field sampling has been completed. All project
samples must be shipped in sturdy styrofoam-
lined insulated corrugated cartons. All samples
are to be wrapped in at least two layers of paper
to prevent container damage and to prevent the
sample codes from rubbing off.
"Blue ice" is to be packed with the samples
to keep them at the proper temperature. If the
transition time between the field and the SCS -
Long Beach lab is expected to be more than three
days, sufficient "blue ice" should be used to keep
the samples adequately chilled. Dry ice should
not be used for shipping purposes.
96
-------
III. Soil and Refuse Sampling Procedure
Soil and refuse samples will be obtained from well lo-
cations during drilling and placement of the in-refuse
wel 1 .
A. Materials Required
1 . One copy Field Sampling Instruction Manual
2. Styrofoam-1ined corrugated shipping cartons
3. Adequate supply of comercially-availab!e
polyethylene bags
4. Several black waterproof marking pens
5. Sufficient "blue ice" for shipping
6. Several roles of fiber-packing or duck tape
7. Notebook
8. Master list of sample sequence numbers and
sampling dates by site
9. One 4 Ib hammer
10. One shovel
11. Core sampling device
12. One tarp 8' x 8'
B. Soil Permeability Sampling
Locate an area of the site where soil cover has
been placed over refuse for some time. With a
shovel excavate the first inch or so of soil to
remove grass, weeds, and organic material
until the soil appears uniform in texture. Drive
the sample device (with hammer) to a depth of
about 12 in. Carefully excavate around the sampler
and remove it, seal both ends and place in a dou-
ble plastic bag. Seal bag and label with site
desi gnat ion.
C. Refuse Sampling from In-Refuse
Refuse samples will be taken from the bore hole at
97
-------
approximately one-third and two-thirds depths of
the landfill, respectively. Place approximately
one shovelful of refuse and/or sludge material
in a double plastic bag, seal and label properly.
D. Soil Sampling from In-Refuse Well
Three soil core samples will be taken from each
site. The first sample will be obtained from the
bottom of the bore hole at the refuse/soil inter-
face. The second and third samples will be taken
half the distance to groundwater and at the soil/
groundwater interface, respectively. A split-tube
or Shelby tube sampler will be used depending on
local well driller equipment capabilities. Place
about 1/3 Ib of soil sample in a double plastic
bag, seal and label the bag properly.
E. Shipment of Soil and Refuse Samples
Soil and refuse samples will be shipped similarly
to liquids as delineated in II(C).
VI. Background Groundwater Sampling Procedures
Sampling procedures for background groundwater are
site specific. Whether samples are drawn from test
facilities or domestic outlets, they should be taken
in a method which will minimize any possible contam-
ination of the samples. Example, if sampling from a
tap, turn tap on and let run for five minutes before
sampling to insure that the piping system has been
thoroughly flushed. Again, sampling will be site-
specific and procedures should be discussed with the
Project Manager to determine the best method for each
case study site.
A. Materials Required
1. Two plastic 2-liter bottles and lids
2. Shipping materials if sampling performed at a
different time than site well sampling
B. Shipment of Samples
Refer to Shipment of Leachate and Groundwater
Samples, II(C).
V. Gas Probe Sampling Procedure
98
-------
Gas samples will be obtained from probes placed in the
in-refuse well hole. Each probe is situated at a dif-
ferent depth within the hole.
A. Materials Required
1. 1/4" I.D. rubber hose (surgical tubing is ade-
quate), 2 - 6-in lengths
2. Sample bottle(s) - 250 ml. (Corning #9500)*
3. Masking tape
4. Rubber suction bulb, aspirator type
5. One copy SCS Field Sampling Instructions
6. Styrofoam-1ined corrugated shipping cartons
7. Several rolls of fiber-packing tape or duck tape
8. Notebook for field notes
9. Master list of sample sequence numbers and
sampling dates by site
B. Gas Sampling (refer to Figure 4 while reading
instructions)
1. Mark sample bottles as shown in Figure 2
2. Remove rubber stopper from the exposed end of
one gas probe
3. Slip the end of one of the 6" pieces of rubber
hose over the probe end
* Gas burettes are to be immersed in a solution of deter-
gent and water to remove residue soils or other foreign
material. Insolubles will be removed by immersing burette
in acetone. Residues that might have remained will be re-
moved by soaking burettes in aqua regia. The burettes are
then rinsed in distilled h^O and dried in the oven at 103°C
for 30 minutes. The burettes are removed and placed in the
desiccators for 30 minutes. Upon cooling, the stopcocks are
greased with Apiezon N grease to insure a tight seal. The
burettes are then evacuated with a vacuum pump just prior
to shipment to the field.
99
-------
RUBBER HOSE
PLASTIC TUBE
-NATURAL
GROUND
BACKFILL-
SAMPLE
'BOTTLE
RUBBER HOSE
RUBBER BULB
FIGURE 4
GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURE
100
-------
4. Slip the other end of the same rubber hose
over one end of the sample bottle.
5. Slip one end of the second piece of rubber
hose over the other end of the sample bottle.
6. Slip the other end of the rubber hose onto
the rubber bulb.
7. Open the sample bottle stopcock nearest the
gas probe. Note: The sample bottle has been
evacuated to remove any contaminants from the
bottle. Thus, when the stopcock is opened, a
brief hissing noise will be heard. This is
the sound of the vacuum being filled. If
the hissing sound is not heard, one of the stop-
cocks may have been opened during transport or
at some other time prior to sample taking.
Make a note of this fact and continue the pre-
scribed sampling procedure.
8. Open the second stopcock.
9. Begin aspirating the rubber bulb to draw in
gases within the probe's area of influence.
The number of squeezes necessary varies with
the probe depth. A rule of thumb: one
squeeze is required for each two feet of probe
depth.
10. When the appropriate number of squeezes have
been taken, close the stopcock nearest the
rubber bulb.
11. Close the other stopcock.
12. Remove the sampling apparatus from the gas
probe and replace the rubber stopper (cap) on
the gas probe end.
13. Follow steps numbers 1-11 until a sample is
obtained from each of the gas probes.
Shipment of Gas Samples
All samples must be sent to SCS - Long Beach
immediately after collection and packing for shipment
(see Figure 5) .
The gas sample bottles must be wrapped with multi-
layers of paper or in packing sleeves to prevent
101
-------
fe.
102
-------
breakage and shipped in styrofoam-1ined corrugated
containers.
VI. Quality Control Procedures for the Arrival of Field
Samples
All leachate, groundwater, and soil samples will be
transferred from shipping containers to refrigeration
immediately upon receipt. This interim storage before
analysis insures temperature control of 3 to 4°C.
Sample temperatures will be recorded for all arriving
water and leachate. Analytical procedures are to
start as soon as practical after receipt of samples.
All incoming samples will be assigned SCS lab sequence
numbers. The numbers will be recorded in a log along
with the date of receipt, sample identifier, descrip-
tion of sample, disposition of the sample, and the
SCS project number.
Gas samples are analyzed upon receipt by gas chromato-
graphy.
This record is a necessary part of the SCS quality
assurance program in which positive disposition
of samples, sample destinations, and analytical results
are effected.
103
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
METHODS FOR
SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS
The following procedures were standardized for the prepara-
tion and analysis of sewage sludge, soil, leachate, and
groundwater samples received from the case study sites.
Sample Preparation
I. Soils and Sludges
A. Sample preparation for water extraction of pH,
Total Solids, COD, Ammonia Nitrogen, Nitrate Nitrogen,
Organic Nitrogen, Chloride, Sulfate, TOC, Moisture,
Heavy Metals and Bacteriological Tests.
1. A representative sample of 75 grams of soil
or sludge was placed in a previously-sterilized
mason glass jar.
2. 750 ml. of sterilized deionized water were added.
3. The contents of the jars were stirred for one-
half hour with mixer. (The chrome plated mixer
blades are flamed for sterilization.)
4. The slurry was allowed to settle.
5. The liquid portion was decanted through a
fluted filter using paper equivalent to What-
man No. l.or Whatman No. 42.
6. A liquid sample of the supernatant was pip-
etted into prepared microbiological tubes for
determination of fecal coliform and fecal
streptococcus.
7. A portion of the supernatant was preserved with
several mis. of concentrated hydrochloric
HC1) acid as a preservative prior to analysis
for total organic carbon (TOC).
8. An aliquot for the COD determination was removed.
9. The supernatant was again used for total kjeldahl
nitrogen, ammonia and nitrate nitrogens, chlor-
ides and sulfates.
10. An aliquot of the supernatant was concentrated
and analyzed for heavy metals (calcium, copper,
106
-------
chromium, lead, iron, mercury, cadmium) by
atomic absorption.
Sample preparation for acid extraction of soils
and sludges for heavy metals (calcium, copper,
chromium, lead, iron, mercury, cadmium) by atomic
absorption.
1. An equal volume of nitric acid (HNOg) was added
to the soil or sludge residue volume remaining
in the jar (following water extraction).
2. A teflon-coated stirring bar was placed in an
agitating mixer on a hot plate and stirred
for approximately 90 minutes (without boiling).
3. Sufficient water was added to the contents to
make up to 750 ml. (Double distilled deionized
water was used in all determinations.) Appro-
priate blanks were prepared for each group of
determi nations.
4. Mercury was determined by a separate procedure
taking 50 ml. of the supernatant solution and
50 ml. of the solid residue, acidifying each
and then run with flameless atomic absorption.
II. Leachate
A. Aliquots of well-shaken leachate were drawn for
pH and total solids determination.
B. A liquid sample of the leachate was pipetted into
prepared microbiological tubes for determination
of fecal coliform and fecal streptococcus.
C. A portion of the leachate was preserved with sever-
al mis. of hydrochloric acid and analyzed for
total organic carbon.
D. An aliquot of leachate was drawn for analysis of
kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, nitrate
nitrogen, chlorides, and sulfates.
E. An aliquot of leachate was digested in nitric acid
by gently refluxing. This process was repeated
several times until the formation of a light-
colored liquid residue. The residue was evaporated
gently to dryness, taken up with 1:1 hydrochloric
acid, the solution then heated, filtered and
107
-------
diluted with doubly distilled deionized water to
a known volume. The solution was analyzed by
atomic absorption spectroscopy for heavy metals.
Analytical Procedures
pJH
All pH measurements were performed using an Orion Model 701
pH Meter with glass electrode in combination with a satur-
ated reference calomel electrode. The pH meter was stan-
dardized periodically under conditions of temperature and
concentration which were as close as possible to those of
the sample, using various standard pH buffer solutions
(pH 4, 7, and 10) .
Total Solids
The procedure used to determine percent solids was evapora-
tion at 180°C in an air convection oven. Standard Methods
(13th Edition, Section USA, p. 288-289).
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Chemical oxygen demand was determined using the dichromate
reflux method. Standard Methods (13th Edition, Section 220,
p. 495).
Ammonia Nitrogen
Ammonia nitrogen was analyzed by distilling procedure.
Standard Methods (13th Edition, Section 132, p. 222).
Nitrate Nitrogen
Nitrate nitrogen was determined by the brucine sulfate
procedure. Standard Methods (13th Edition, Section 213C,
p. 461).
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Organic nitrogen was determined by the classic kjeldahl
procedures. Standard Methods (13th Edition, Section 216,
p. 469).
Chloride
Chlorides were determined via the mercuric nitrate procedure.
Standard Methods (13th Edition, section 112B, p. 97).
108
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
PROPOSED NATIONAL INTERIM PRIMARY
DRINKING WATER STANDARDS
Maximum Contaminant Levels for Inorganic Chemicals
Contaminant Level (mg/1) Contaminant Level (mg/1)
Arsenic 0.05 Lead 0.05
Barium 1. Mercury 0.002
Cadmium 0.010 Nitrate 10.
Chromium 0.05 Selenium 0.01
Cyanide 0.2 Silver 0.05
F1uorides - When the annual average of the maximum daily air
temperatures for the location in which the public water system
is situated is the following, the corresponding concentration
of fluoride shall not be exceeded:
Temperature (in
degrees F) (degrees C) Level (mg/1)
50.0-53.7 10.0-12.0 2.4
53.8-58.3 12.1-14.6 2.2
58.4-63.8 14.7-17.6 2.0
63.9-70.6 17.7-21.4 1.8
70.7-79.2 21.5-26.2 1.6
79.3-90.5 26.3-32.5 1.4
Maximum Contaminant Levels for Organic Chemicals
The maximum contaminant level for the total concentration of
organic chemicals is 0.7 mg/1.
Maximum Contaminant Levels for Pesticides
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Level (mg/1)
Chlordane 0.003
Endrin 0.0002
Heptachlor 0.0001
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.0001
Lindane 0.004
Methoxychlor 0.1
Toxaphene 0.005
110
-------
Chlorophenoxys Level (mg/1)
2,4-D 0.1
2,4,5-TP Silvex 0.01
Maximum Microbiological Contaminant Levels
Two methods may be used:
(1) When membrane filter technique is used, coliform densities
shall not exceed one per 100 milliliters as arithmetic mean
of all samples examined per month and either
(i) Four per 100 milliliters in more than one standard
sample when less than 20 are examined per month; or
(ii) Four per 100 milliliters in more than five percent
of the standard samples when 20 or more are examined
per month.
(2)(a) When fermentation tube method is used and 10 milliliter
standard portions, coliforms shall not be present in more than
10 percent of the portions in any month; and either
(i) Three or more portions in one sample when less than
20 samples are examined per month; or
(ii) Three or more portions in more than five percent of
the samples if 20 or more samples are examined per
month.
(b) When fermentation tube method is used and 100 milliliter
standard portions, coliforms shall not be present in more than
60 percent of the portions in any month; and either
(i) Five or more portions in more than one sample when
less than five samples are examined; or
(ii) Five or more portions in more than 20 percent of
samples when five samples or more are examined.
Supplier of water shall provide water in which there shall be
no greater than 500 organisms per one milliliter as determined
by the standard bacterial plate county.
Maximum Contaminant Level of Turbidity
The level at representative entry point(s) to the distribution
system is one turbidity unit (TU) except that five or fewer
111
-------
turbidity units may be allowed if supplier can demonstrate
to State that higher turbidity does not:
(a) Interfere with disinfection;
(b) Prevent maintenance of an effective disinfectant
agent through the distribution system; and
(c) Interfere with microbiological determinations.
W01575
SW-5U7c
4 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1977 720-116/5723
112
-------
U
£
w
a
H
U
H(^
^ o
o S
go
C/3
D)
5
Is
T3 CM
-------