905D76102
                U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
                PROTECTION AGENCY
                REGION V
         ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

                DRAFT

                Sludge Disposal
                and Land Reclamation
                in Fulton County, Illinois
                June 1976

-------
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL  IMPACT STATEMENT
                      FOR
    SLUDGE DISPOSAL  AND  LAND RECLAMATION
         IN FULTON COUNTY,  ILLINOIS
               Prepared  By  The
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  REGION  V
              CHICAGO,  ILLINOIS

           With The Assistance  Of
            ENVIRO CONTROL, INC.
             ROCKVILLE,  MARYLAND
                                APPROVED BY:
                                VALDAS Ml ADfMKUS
                                DEPUTY REGI
                                JUNE  1976
RATOR
                                      r;wimnf.!?Ltal Pr.-tr-o-H'-n A,-en?-,
   i,?-en?7

-------

-------
                            SUMMARY SHEET

(X)  Draft
(  )  Final
U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency Region V, Chicago
1.   (X)  Administrative Action
    (  )  Legislative Action
2.   Description of the Action
    An analysis of the methodologies utilized by the Metropolitan
Sanitary District of Greater Chicago for the application of sludge
on  strip mined land in Fulton County, Illinois is presented.  Since
the project is already being implemented, this statement uniquely
presents the current and projected impacts of continued operations.
Digested sludge is loaded at MSDGC's West-Southwest Treatment Plant
in  Stickney, Illinois and barged approximately 200 miles down the
Illinois River to Liverpool.  From the Liverpool dock the sludge is
pumped out and relayed 10 miles via underground pipeline to the pro-
ject holding basins for storage.  Dredge equipment is used to mix
the sludge to a uniform consistency and solids content of 6% or less
before pumping from the basins into the distribution system.
    Sludge is applied from early spring to late fall utilizing a
traveling sprayer and a soil injection system.  The spray application
system is scheduled to be phased out.
    Each field receiving sludge has been contoured to allow collec-
tion  of runoff due to storm events or application.  Environmental
control  systems are employed to monitor surface and ground water,
soil  and rock, plants and aquatic biota, and the atmosphere.

-------
3.   Environmental  Impacts
a.   Water
    Contamination  of surface water  has  occurred  at the project site
due to runoff from sludge application  to  fields  and release of effluents
from field retention basins.  Retention basins  were found  to have in-
sufficient capacity and  therefore  ineffective  in removing  suspended
solids resulting in siltation and  excess  dissolved oxygen  depletion
in  receiving  waters.  However,  runoff  from  strip-mined areas and
effluents from septic tanks  and the sewage  treatment plant also con-
tribute to this pollution.   Groundwater,  as  sampled at wells and
springs,  has  not been degraded  by  the  application  of sludge.  However,
groundwater is significantly contaminated from  natural geochemical
sources,  particularly by exposure  from  past  strip-mining.
b.   Soils
    Sludge has a beneficial  effect  upon the  physical properties of
soils.  The high organic content of sludge  provides a matrix for
formation of  a stable soil  structure.   Incorporation of sludge into
soils by  either disking  after spray application  or direct  injection
decreases the chance for runoff and erosion.   Soil loading rates
will be determined based upon heavy metals  as  limiting factors.
c.   Odors and Noise
    Complaints of  offensive  odors  have  arisen  from citizens within  a
4 to 5 mile area surrounding the sludge application sites  and holding
basins.  The  malodorant   is  generated  as  an  earthy  smell.  The pre-
vailing winds at the project site  are  south  to  southwest dispersing
the airborne  odorants along  the northerly perimeter of the MSDGC
property.

                                  i i

-------
A reduction in malodorants will occur due to the modification of
application to soil injection.  This malodorant reduction will  be
directly attributable to the reduction of aerosols.
    Noise generated at the Liverpool dock includes the noise
associated with barge manuvering and booster pumping.  These activi-
ties increase the ambient noise levels around the community of Liver-
pool.  Noise levels at the site are attributed to tractors and sludge
sprayers.  These noise levels can be detected at the perimeter of the
project site.  These noise levels are similar to existing agricultural
noises in magnitude and duration.
d.  Health Effects
    Among all methods of sludge application, pressurized spraying
offers the greatest potential for direct transfer of hazardous com-
ponents to humans or animals.  Inhalation of sludge aerosols possibly
containing pathogens or toxic substances presents an opportunity for
protracted and repetitive exposure.  The lack of reported cases of
health effects with Fulton County may indicate that the level of risk
associated with sludge application is low, rather than non-existent.
    Indirect effects are caused by the consumption of plants or animals
that have been contaminated by heavy metals.  The interactions  among
sludge components and the food chain are complex and information
concerning the ability of each trophic level to accumulate toxic
compounds and pass them on to succeeding trophic levels is sparse and
qualitative at best.  The most likely suspects for potential hazard
are arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and selenium.  Both sludge and
soil at the project site are high in cadmium, especially in relation
to zinc.   Cadmium enrichment may be the most limiting single factor
in sludge loading rates.

                                  i i i

-------
          The actual  indirect hazard  to  humans  would  stem from the
future use of reclaimed  strip-mined  land  for  cropping  or  livestock
grazing,  possibly resulting  in  a  majority of  a  family's  food intake
being contaminated by trace  elements.
e.   Socio-economic Effects
    The most obvious  short-term local  economic  effect  of  the project
has been  to create jobs  for  approximately 120 skilled  and unskilled
contract  laborers who average 6 to  8  months  of  employment yearly.
    The sludge application  project  has also  affected  the  local  public
finance by increasing future market  value of  the  land  and the tax  base.
f.   Land  Use
    Levelling and grading  of strip-mined  sections  of  the  project site
to  prepare the sludge application  fields  have increased  the  suitability
of  the land for agriculture.   The  removal  of  surface  rocks and  levelling
of  steep  slopes have  also  considerably increased  suitability for recrea-
tional use including  playgrounds,  campsites,  recreation  building sites,
roads, and trails.
4.   Alternatives Considered
    The alternatives  that  were  examined  by MSDGC  in development of the
project are divided into five subsystems  which  include various  options.
The subsystems are:
A.   Sludge Dewatering Subsystems
    1.  Air drying on sand  beds
    2.  Thickening by gravity sedimentation  or  flotation
    3.  Dewatering by centrifugation  and  vacuum filtration
    4.  Dual cell gravity  dewatering  and  freezing-thaw technique
    5.  Use of moving filter screens  or  a belt-filter  press  or
        vertical screw press

-------
B.   Sludge Stabilization Subsystems
    1.   Heated anaerobic digestion
    2.   Imhoff digestion
    3.   Incineration
    4.   Heat drying
    5.   Wet air oxidation
C.   Sludge Disposal Subsystems
    1.   Sanitary landfi11
    2.   Lagooning
    3.   Ocean dumping
D.   Sludge Utilization Subsystems
    1.   Fertilizer production
    2.   Composting
    3.   Soil reclamation
E.   Sludge Transportation Subsystems
    1.   Truck transportation
    2.   Rail transportation
    3.   Barge transportation
    4.   Pipeline transportation
5.   Federal, State, and  Local Agencies and Individuals Notified
    of  Thi s Action
    Federal
       Senator Adlai  E.  Stevenson,  III
       Senator Charles H.  Percy
       Representative Thomas Railsback
       Representative Robert Michel

-------
Council  on Environmental  Quality
Environmental  Protection  Agency
   Office of Federal  Activities
-  Office of Public Affairs
   Office of Water Programs Operations
   Environmental  Evaluation Branch
Department of Interior
   Bureau of Outdoor Recreation
   Fish and Wildlife Services
   Office of Environmental Project Review
Department of Defense
   Army Corps of Engineers
   North Central  Division
-  Chicago District Office
Department of Agriculture
   Soil Conservation Service
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
State
   Governor of Illinois
   Illinois Institute for Environmental Quality
   Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
   Illinois Department of Transportation
   Illinois Division of Waterways
   Illinois Division of Water  Pollution Control
   Illinois Department of Conservation
   University of  Illinois
                              VI

-------
    Local
       Fulton  County Board
       Fulton  County Board  of  Health
       Fulton  County Medical  Society
       Spoon  River  College
       Metropolitan Sanitary  District  of  Greater  Chicago
       City of Canton
       City of Lewistown
    -   Village of Bryant
    -   Village of St. David
       Village of Cuba
       League  of Women Voters  of Cook  County
       Natural Land Institute

    Others
6.   Dates Draft Statement made available  to:
    The Council on  Environmental Quality:      June  17,  1976
    The Public:                               June  25,  1976
                                  vi i

-------

-------
                             FOREWORD

    Unlike most Environmental Impact Statements, this Draft EIS does
not concentrate on the details of a particular project or group of
projects, but rather is meant to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and
environmental compatibility of sludge application on strip-mined land
in Fulton County.   The grant applicant for this sludge application/land
reclamation program is the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater
Chicago (MSDGC).  In January, 1975 the MSDGC submitted an eight-volume
facilities plan to Region V.  Included in this facilities plan was the
sludge application program which is the subject of this Draft EIS.
    It should also be pointed out that the MSDGC has been implementing
this program, known as the Prairie Plan, since 1971 without federal
funding.  The nature and extent of future federal participation in
the Fulton County program will  depend, in part, upon the conclusions
reached in this EIS.
    It should also be emphasized that the total MSDGC sludge preparation
and disposal program is not within the purview of this impact statement.
The ancillary sludge preparation processes and programs are only included
to the extent that they influence the quality of sludge transported to
the Fulton County site.
    Chapter One has been prepared to give an overview to the reader of
the major findings.  More detailed discussions can be found in the sub-
sequent chapters.
                                IX

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Summary  Sheet                                                   i
  Forward                                                         ix
  List  of  Figures                                                xv
  List  of  Tables                                               xix
  I.   SUMMARY  AND CONCLUSIONS                                     1-1
      A.    Existing  Project Site and Operations                   1-1
      B.    Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Methods
            of  Sludge Processing and Disposal                      1-4
      C.    Current Conditions of the Environment                  1-7
      D.    Significant  Socio-Economic and Environmental
            Effects of the  Project                                 1-12
      E.    Mitigative and  Preventive Measures                     1-25
 II.   BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION                                II-l
      A.    Project Background and Overview                       II-l
      B.    Planning  Area and Standards                           11-16
      C.    Present Wastewater Treatment Systems               •   11-24
      Bibliography                                               11-37
III.   DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT                                III-l
      A.    Project Site and Operations                          III-l
      B.    Environmental Control and Monitoring Systems         111-19
      Bibliography                                              II I -30
 IV.   PRESENT  CONDITIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT                      IV-1
      A.    Climate and  Topography                                IV-1
      B.    Geology and  Soils                                     IV-14
      C.    Hydrology and Water Quality                           IV-20
      D.    Biology and  Ecosystems                                IV-31
      E.    Population and  Economics                              IV-33
      F.    Land Use  and Development                              IV-48
      G.    Environmentally Sensitive Areas                       IV-58
      Bibliography                                               IV-62
                                      xi

-------
   Table of Contents  (Continued)
                                                                    Page
   V.    COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS                    V-l
        OF SLUDGE PROCESSING AND  DISPOSAL
        A.    Sludge Dewatering Subsystems                            V-2
        B.    Sludge Stabilization Subsystems                          V-9
        C.    Sludge Disposal Subsystems                               V-19
        D.    Sludge Utilization Subsystems                  ,         V-25
        E.    Sludge Transportation Subsystems                         V-34
        F.    Cost-Effectiveness of System Alternatives                V-41
        Bibliography                                                 V-55
  VI.    SIGNIFICANT SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND LAND USE                     VI-1
        EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
        A.    Potential  Socio-Economic Change                         VI-1
        B.    Land Use Opportunities and  Constraints                  VI-11
        Bibliography                                                VI-17
 VII.    SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT           VII-1
        A.    Quality and Quantity of Applied Sludge                 VII-1
        B.    Theoretical Considerations  in Odor Emission           VII-14
        C.    Odor Potential  of Sludge Holding  Basins                VII-23
        D.    Odor Potential  of Alternative Sludge                  VII-37
             Application Methods
        E.    Potential  Surface Water Contamination                 VII-46
        F.    Potential  Groundwater Contamination                   VII-65
        G.    Potential  Soil  Contamination                          VII-71
        H.    Potential  Noise Problems                              VII-75
        Bibliography                                               VI1-81
VIII.    DIRECT HEALTH EFFECTS OF  THE PROJECT                       VIII-1
        A.    Theoretical Considerations  in Assessing  Direct       VIII-1
             Health Effects of Sludge Aerosols
        B.    Potential  Direct Health Hazard of Airborne           VIII-16
             Pathogens and Toxic  Substances
        C.    Measures to Prevent  or Mitigate Direct                VIII-21
             Health Hazards
        Bibliography                                              VI11-23
                                        XI 1

-------
 Table of Contents (Continued)
                                                                 Page
IX.    INDIRECT HEALTH EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT                     IX-1
      A.    Theoretical  Considerations in Assessing               IX-1
           Indirect Health Effects
      B.    Potential  Direct Health Hazard of                     IX-12
           Biomagnified Toxic Substances
      C.    Measures to  Prevent or Mitigate                       IX-42
           Indirect Health Hazards
      Bibliography                                               IX-44
  APPENDIX A
  APPENDIX B
  APPENDIX C
                                      xi

-------
                             LIST OF FIGURES
                                                                  Page
  1-1.    System Operations and Sludge Flows                        1-5
  1-2.    Injection Unit Showing Three Injectors                    1-28
 II-l.    Project Site and Surrounding Area                        11-17
 II-2.    Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago        11-25
         Sewage and Wastewater Treatment Plant Locations
 II-3.    West-Southwest Sewage Treatment Works Plant Layout       11-28
 11-4.    West-Southwest Sewage Treatment Works Flow Diagram       11-29
 II-5.    Existing MSDGC Solids Systems                            11-31
 II-6.    In-Plant Sludge Flow and Sludge Operation at             11-34
         West-Southwest Plant, 1973
III-l.    Barging Route to Fulton County                          III-3
III-2.    Holding Basins for Storage of Sewage Sludge             III-4
III-3.    Past Sludge Shipments between West-Southwest            III-5
         Plant, Lawndale Lagoons, and Holding Basins
         at Project Site
III-4.    Typical Vertical Profiles of Characteristics            III-6
         of Sludge in Holding Basins 1, 2 and 3A, April  1975
III-5.    Holding Basins, Dredge Operation, and                   III-9
         Distribution System
III-6.    Traveling Sprayer Applying Liquid Sludge to a           111-10
         Corn Crop, and Disk Incorporation with Trailing
         Supply Hose
III-7.    Travel Scheme of Sprayer Vehicle                        III-l1
III-8.    Injection Unit Showing Three Injectors                  111-13
III-9.    Sludge Application Fields at the Project Site           111-14
         and Their Runoff Retention Basins
111-10.  Periods of Sludge Application to Fields in              111-15
         Fulton County
III-ll.  Fulton County Sewage Sludge (Liquid Fertilizer)         111-17
         Application Progress and Goals for 1974
111-12.  Fulton County Sewage Sludge (Liquid Fertilizer)         111-18
         Application Progress and Goals for 1975
111-13.  Typical Storm Runoff Retention Basin                    111-20
111-14.  Drainage Control Features of a Typical Field            111-22
III-l5.  Water Monitoring Locations in Fulton County             111-24
 IV-1.    Patterns of Variation in Monthly Average, Maximum,       IV-3
         and Minimum Temperatures at Peoria Airport Station,
         40-Year Data from 1935 to T974
 IV-2.    Variations in Monthly Mean, Maximum, and Minimum         IV-4
         Precipitation at Peoria Airport Station
                                     xv

-------
List of Figures (Continued)
                                                                  Page
 IV-3.    Variations in Monthly Mean,  Maximum,  and Minimum         IV-6
         Snowfall, Peoria Airport Station,  40-Year Data
         from 1935 to 1974
 IV-4.    Wind Rose at Meteorological  Station #14842,              IV-9
         Peoria, Illinois, January 1964 through December
         1973
 IV-5.    Wind Rose at Storage Basins, MSDGC Fulton                IV-9
         County Project Site
 IV-6.    Typical Stratigraphic Profile in the  Project Area        IV-15
 IV-7.    Spatial Distribution of Soil Areas                       IV-18
 IV-8.    Illinois River and Tributaries Associated with           IV-21
         the Project Site
 IV-9.    Pattern of Groundwater Flow                              IV-24
 IV-10.  Fulton County Township Population  Change,                IV-36
         1960-1970
 IV-11.  Fulton County Land Use, 1968                             IV-50
 IV-12.  Average Traffic Volumes Near the Project Area            IV-56
 IV-13.  Major Environmentally Sensitive Areas in                 IV-59
         Fulton County
  V-l.    Surface Spreading Costs                                   V-33
  V-2.    Truck Costs                                               V-35
  V-3.    Rail Costs                                                V-38
  V-4.    System Operations and Sludge Flows                        V-43
VII-1.    Total Solids Concentration in Sludge from the           VII-3
         Lawndale Lagoons
VII-2.    Volatile Solids Concentrations in  Sludge from           VII-3
         the Lawndale Lagoons
VII-3.    Volatile Acids Concentrations in Sludge from            VII-4
         the Lawndale Lagoons
VII-4.    Alkalinity Concentrations in Sludge from the            VII-4
         Lawndale Lagoons
VII-5.    Total Solids Concentrations in Sludge from the          VII-5
         WSW Plant
VII-6.    Total Volatile Solids Concentrations in Sludge          VII-5
         from the WSW Plant
VII-7.    Volatile Acids Concentrations in Sludge from            VII-6
         the WSW Plant
VII-8.    Alkalinity Concentrations in Sludge from the            VII-6
         WSW Plant
                                      xvi

-------
List of Figures (continued)

                                                                Page
VII-9.   Flow Diagram of Sludge                                VII-9
VII-10.  Location of Odor Complaints, Wind Direction
         and Wind Velocity                                     VII-24
VII-11.  Correlation of Atmospheric Ammonia Concentration
         with Ambient Air Temperature                          VII-26
VII-12.  "Ammonia Rose"; Directional Annual Percent Fre-
         quency of Ammonia Concentration at the Project
         Site in the Ranges of 0-0.5, 0.51-1.0, 1.01-1.50,
         1.51-2.0, and 2.01 ppm or Higher                      VII-29
VII-13.  Frequencies of Source Concentrations of Atmospheric
         Ammonia (NH3)                                         VI1-31
VI1-14.  Downwind Atmospheric Dilution Ration Under the
         Worst Conditions                                      VI1-33
VII-15.  Downwind Atmospheric Dilution Ratio Under the
         Most Probable Conditions                              VI1-34
VII-16.  Mass Half-Life and Residence Time of Aerosols         VII-40
VII-16.  Overland Flow Application of Sludge                   VII-43
VII-17.  Overland Flow Application of Sludge                   VII-43
VII-18.  Infiltration-Percolation of Sludge                    VII-43
VII-19.  General Area Applied with Sludge and Water
         Monitoring Stations                                   VI1-47
VII-20.  Variation of Fecal Coliform Concentrations with
         Time for Stations SI and S2                           VI1-52
VI1-21.  Reservoir Water Temperature and Level  of
         Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.)                                VII-56
VII-22.  Common Indoor and Outdoor Noise Levels                VII-76
VII-23.  Range of Sound Pressure  Levels from Pumps             VI1-78
VII-24.  Single Vehicle Noise Output as a Function
         of Vehicle Speed                                      VII-79
.IX-1.   Sources of Interaction of Sludge Components in
         the Food Chain                                         IX-2
 IX-2.   Major Interactions of Sludge and Soil  Constituents      IX-3
 IX-3.   Effect of Sewage Sludge  on Stable Aggregates           IX-5
                               xvi i

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

  1-1.    Ranking  of Alternative Systems                            1-6
  1-2.    Hazard Analysis                                           l'27
 II-].    Composition of Fresh,  Anaerobically Digested             II-3
         Sewage Sludge
 11-2.    Water Quality Standards for  the  State  of  Illinois        11-20
 II-3.    Effluent Standards  for Retention Basin Discharge         11-21
         in the State of  Illinois
 II-4.    Performance of MSDGC Plants                              11-26
 II-5.    West-Southwest Sludge Processing Systems,  1973           11-32
 II-6.    Forecast of Average Dry Weather  Flow  (ADWF)  and          11-35
         Raw Sludge Production
 II-7.    Average  Sludge Production Rates  for  Different           11-36
         Sludge  Processing Systems in the WSW  Plant,  1973
III-l.    Sludge Application Rates and Amounts                    111-16
III-2.    Fulton  County Land Reclamation  Project                 111-23
         Sewage  Sludge Analysis, April  1975
III-3.    Fulton  County Land Reclamation  Project                 111-26
         Water Analysis,  April 1975
III-4.    Retention Basin  Effluent Quality                       111-27
III-5.    Atmospheric NH3  Concentrations  and Sampling             111-29
         Conditions at the MSDGC Liquid  Fertilizer
         Holding  Basins in Fulton County During April  1975
 IV-1.    Predicted 24-Hour Storm Patterns for  Fulton              IV-5
         County
 IV-2.    Average  Annual Frequencies of Wind Vectors in           IV-8
         Percentage, Greater Peoria Airport,  January
         1964 through December 1973
 IV-3.    Atmospheric Stability at the Greater  Peoria              IV-11
         Airport  Station
 IV-4.    Summary  of Climatic Conditions  in the Area of           IV-12
         Peoria,  Illinois
 IV-5.    Selected Characteristics of the Fulton County           IV-17
         Calcareous Mine  Spoil Material
 IV-6.    Daily Discharges at USGS Gage Stations                  IV-20
 IV-7.    Elevations of Well  Water                                IV-23
 IV-8.    Surface  Water Quality in 1971                            IV-26
 IV-9.    Range of Various Water Quality  Parameters in            IV-28
         Well Water, 1971 and 1972;  and  U.S. Averages
 IV-10.   Levels  of Nitrite and Nitrate Nitrogen and              IV-29
         Ammonia  Nitrogen in Well Waters  in 1972

                                   xix

-------
 List of Tables  (Continued)
                                                                  Page

 IV-11.   Historical  Populations  Trends  in  Fulton  County          IV-34
 IV-12.   Population  Projections  for  Fulton County                IV-37
 IV-13.   Trends  in Median Family Income                          IV-38
 IV-14.   Employment  Structure in Fulton County,  Illinois         IV-39
 IV-15.   Trends  in Government Finances  in  Fulton  County,         IV-40
         Illinois
 IV-16.   Trends  in the Total  Value of Real Estate in             IV-41
         Fulton  County
 IV-17.   Historical  Agricultural Trends in Fulton County,        IV-42
         111inois
 IV-18.   Economic Trends in  Mining in Fulton County, Illinois    IV-43
 IV-19.   Historical  Manufacturing Trends in Fulton County,       IV-45
         Illinois
 IV-20.   Trends  in Retail Trade  in Fulton  County, Illinois       IV-46
 IV-21.   Trends  in Wholesale Trade in Fulton County,             IV-47
         Illinois
 IV-22.   Major Land  Holders  in Fulton County, 1973               IV-51
 IV-23.   1973 Land Use Survey of Strip-Mine Lands in             IV-52
         Fulton  County, Illinois
  V-l.   Annual  Capital and  Operating Costs for                    V-15
         Multiple Hearth Incineration
  V-2.   Digested Sludge Application Rates                        V-30
  V-3.   Land Spreading Costs                                     V-32
  V-4.   System  Alternatives, System Requirements,                V-44
         Construction Phasing, and Life of Facilities
  V-5.   Potential Environmental Effects of System                V-49
         Alternatives
  V-6.   Ratings of  Alternative  Systems                           V-53
VII-1    Comparison  of Sludge Characteristics with              VII-8
         Applicable  Sludge Quality Standards
VII-2.   Compliance  of Sludge Quality with Applicable           VII-7
         Standards as of May 1975
VII-3.   Characteristics of  Sludge Applied to the               VII-10
         Project Fields
VII-4.   Amounts of  Sludge and Supernatant Barged to and        VII-12
         from the Holding Basins in  Fulton County
VII-5.   Solubility, Vapor Pressure and Evaporative Half-       VII-15
         Life of Chemicals in Aqueous Solution at 25°C
                                    xx

-------
 List of Tables (Continued)
 VII-6.    Odor Thresholds and Descriptions                         VII-20
 VII-7.    Ratio of Violations and Observations Reported            VII-48
          at Various Stream Sampling Stations, July 1972
          to July 1975
 VII-8.    Fecal Coliform Concentrations in Streams,                VII-50
          July 1972 to July 1975
 VI1-9.    Water Quality of Reservoirs                              VII-53
 VII-10.   Effluent Quality of Runoff Retention Basins              VII-59
 VII-11.   Capacity of Runoff Retention Basins and Volume           VI1-62
          of 24-Hour Storm Runoff
 VII-12.   Classification of Monitoring Wells                       VII-66
 VII-13.   Concentrations of Various Constituents in                VII-69
          Groundwater
 VII-14.   Metals, Exchangeable Calcium, and Organic Content        VII-72
          of Spoil Material and Place Lands in Fulton
          County Prior to the Application of Digested
          Sludge
 VII-15.   Noise Level in dBA of Various Noise Sources as a         VII-77
          Function of Distance
VIII-1.    Composition of Fresh, Heated, Anaerobically             VIII-4
          Digested Sewage Sludge
VIII-2.    Amount of Sludge Applied as a Function of               VIII-8
          Spraying Time
VIII-3.    Values of Crosswind Standard Deviation                  VIII-11
VIII-4.    Values of Vertical Standard Deviations                  VIII-11
VIII-5.    Values of Sludge Aerosol Concentrations                 VIII-12
VIII-6.    Calculated Respiratory Intake of Sludge                 VIII-13
          Particles for One Day of Spraying
VIII-7.    Analysis of Liquid Sludge                               VIII-14
VIII-8.    Calculated Respiratory Intake                           VIII-14
VIII-9.    Five-Minute Survival at Different Humidities            VIII-17
  IX-1.    Comparisons of Normal Soil Constituents to a              IX-13
          Sludge Loading Rate of 200 Dry Tons Per Acre
  IX-2.    Changes in the Concentrations of Extractable Trace        IX-14
          Elements in Soil Following Application of 76 Tons
          of Sewage Sludge Over a Period of 12 Years
  IX-3.    Element Analysis of Sludge and Top Six Inches             IX-15
          of Soil
  IX-4.    Recovery of Trace Elements as a Function of Trace         IX-16
          Elements Applied
                                  xxi

-------
List of Tables (Continued)

                                                               Page

IX-5.    Trace Elements Extracted by 0.5^ HOAc from                IX-18
        Soils Treated with Sewage Sludge for 19 Years
        and the Sewage Sludge Applied, and Compared
        with Normal  Scottish Soils

IX-6.    Concentrations of Various Trace Elements Extracted        IX-19
        From Sludge-Amended Acid Spoil Mine Material

IX-7.    Concentrations of Trace Elements Extracted With           IX-20
        O.lN^HCl from Sludge-Amended Soils

IX-8.    Concentrations of Trace Elements in Soils and             IX-23
        Plants

IX-9.    Content of Trace Elements in Corn Versus                  IX-24
        Levels in Sludge

IX-10.  Analysis of Soybeans Versus Total and Extractable         IX-26
        Soil Elements

IX-11.  Effect of Ni Applied to Soils at Different pH             IX-28
        Levels on the Ni Content of Spring Wheat

IX-12.  Copper and Nickel Concentrations in Oat Plants            IX-28
        as  Influenced by Amount of Sewage Sludge Applied
        and Soil pH

IX-13.  Trace Element Composition and Yield of Rye                IX-29
        Clippings as  Influenced by Sludge Applications
        to  Soils

IX-14.  Probable Available Form, Average Composition              IX-30
        Range for Selected Agronomic  Crops, and Suggested
        Tolerance Levels of Heavy Metals in Crops

IX-15.  Short-Term Toxicities of Elements in Feeds                IX-32
IX-16.  Provisional Recommendations for Cd, Pb and  Hg             IX-37
IX-17.  Recommended Limits for  Drinking Water                     IX-38
                                  xxi 1

-------
                       I.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     This chapter presents the major findings of this report.   The
presentation begins with a summary description of the existing Fulton
County project and a discussion of the cost-effectiveness of alterna-
tive sewage sludge treatment and disposal processes, which conveys the
overall attractiveness of sludge application to land as compared to
other system options.  It continues with a summary of the present en-
vironmental and socio-economic conditions that are related to the as-
sessment of known or predicted project impacts.  The known and poten-
tial environmental and socio-economic effects of the project are then
reviewed.  Once the potential hazards or risks have been recognized,
the presentation concludes by recommending precautions or safeguards
that should be employed in future project operations.  Further monitor-
ing and analysis required to fill information gaps are suggested.

A.   EXISTING PROJECT SITE AND OPERATIONS

     The Fulton County land reclamation project site is located cen-
trally in Fulton County, which is situated in the upper region of the
Spoon River watershed in west central Illinois (Figure 1-1).  Before
the project was conceived, approximately 45,000 acres or 60% of the
land in Fulton County had been strip-mined, and the county was adding
to this at a rate of 1,200 to 2,000 acres per year.  On October 30,
1970 the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (MSDGC) pur-
chased 5,461 acres of land from a private source and made arrangements
with county and state agencies for sewage sludge application to por-
tions of the site.  As of August 1975, the MSDGC owned 15,528 acres of
land in Fulton County.  The Sanitary District does not anticipate any
future significant land purchases upon fulfilling the development plans
for the present land holdings.

     Construction work began in January 1971.  Since that time, the
project site has been contoured and terraced to create fields suitable
for sludge application.  Between 1971 and 1973, 43 application fields
                                    1-1

-------
were developed, ranging in size from 15 to 150 acres.   Four large hold-
ing basins have been constructed to store sludge  before application to
the fields.

     The operations begin when digested sewage sludge  from the MSDGC
West-Southwest Treatment Plant or sludge from the Lawndale lagoons, or
a mixture, is barged approximately 200  miles  down the  Illinois River
to the dock at Liverpool in Fulton County.  The sludge is  pumped out
and relayed 10 miles by booster pumps to the  project holding basins
for storage.  Dredge equipment is used  to mix the sludge to a uniform
consistency and solids content of 6% or less  before  pumping from the
holding basins into a piped distribution system.

     The sludge is applied to the soil  by a traveling  sprayer, a mold-
board plow or tandem disk incorporator, a soil  injector mounted on a
tank truck,  or gated irrigation pipe.  Spraying is accomplished by
modular units consisting of pumps, an above-ground header  system, and
a "big gun"  spray vehicle.  Liquid sludge is  sprayed at a  rate of 600
gpm, a pressure of 90 psi, and a horizontal throw of 120 to 150 ft.
The tandem disk incorporator applies sludge to the entire  cross-sec-
tional area of the soil, using a disking machine  with  a distribution
manifold that directs sludge to each disk while tilling the soil.  The
soil injector works on the same principle as  the  incorporator, except
that the injector applies sludge into slots formed in  the  soil by a
tool shank.   With the gated irrigation  pipe,  the  slotted pipe is laid
on high ground and liquid sludge is pumped through the slots.

     Sludge is applied from early spring to late  fall, at  a maximum
rate in May.  Approximately 553 dry tons of sludge were applied to
about 207 acres of land in 1972.  Sludge application rates and the
total tonnage of sludge applied in 1973 through 1975 are shown in Ta-
ble 1-1 (p.  111-16).

     To protect against environmental degradation resulting from the
project, the sludge holding basins were lined to  prevent groundwater
                                    1-2

-------
seepage, control berms and retention basins were installed to contain
storm runoff and control field effluent quality, and the fields were
graded to reduce runoff velocity, erosion and sedimentation.  The ef-
fectiveness of environmental control systems and the environmental
soundness of project operations are monitored by five systems pertain-
ing to sludge, surface and ground water, soil and rock, plants and
aquatic biota, and the atmosphere.

     A sludge analysis program is designed to ensure adequate treat-
ment of the sludge before shipment to the holding basins.  The water
monitoring system includes sampling, analysis, data reduction and re-
porting.  Prior to initial project operations, 52 soil  borings were
made to bedrock; these will be compared with another set of borings
to be made in 1977.   Ecological and biochemical  studies are being
conducted to determine effects of sewage sludge application.  In ad-
dition, a meteorological station was set up close to the holding ba-
sins to measure air temperature, wind speed and direction, relative
humidity, rainfall,  and atmospheric ammonia concentration.  From its
beginning in 1971 through March 1975, every aspect of project opera-
tions was performed under permits issued by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency and the Fulton County Health Department.  The Fulton
County Planning Commission reviews all  land use plans and requests modi-
fications or gives approval.
                                    1-3

-------
B.    COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS  OF SLUDGE
     PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL
     The sludge processing and disposal  methods  currently practiced by
the MSDGC represent nearly the full  spectrum of  system alternatives.
Included in the body of this report  is  a careful  analysis of ten system
options which were derived by the MSDGC from various combinations of
subsystems for sludge dewatering, stabilization,  disposal, utilization,
and transportation.  The ten systems chosen for  analysis are delineated
in Figure 1-1.

     The cost-effectiveness of a system represents a balance between
capital, operating and maintenance costs, system reliability, environ-
mental impacts, and costs for measures  effected  to prevent or mitigate
the potential environmental hazards  or  risks.  The only component in
this balance for which actual values can be assigned is total annual
costs, excluding the cost of extraordinary mitigating measures.   Envi-
ronmental impacts can be assessed only  in terms  of relative potential
impacts from each system alternative, as the state of the art has not
progressed to the point of reliably assigning monetary or other exact
values to environmental effects.

     Table 1-1 summarizes the total  annual costs, limits to reliability,
relative environmental impacts, and relative major mitigation costs for
each system alternative.  The ratings in this table are strictly judg-
mental, and are based on a review and synthesis  of subsystem characteris-
ti cs.
                                     1-4

-------
System
   1      Rotation-Concentration -> $£*% -> gJHfujj   _» Sanitary
   I     Flotation-Concentration -+%£*£

                                                           or rail ,
                                                           200 mi )

                                   *          _        pplication
   3     Flotation-Concentration-*---   (-^ ^S?d S^ e
                                              200 ml)

   4     Centrifuge Dewaterlng  —^ Heat Drying 	^ Fertilizer Sale

   5     Centrifuge Dewaterlng  	^Incineration  '(truck ^ fin^f^Ash"^"
—^Flotation-Concentration
         (781 dt/d)


—^Centrifuge Oewaterlng —
         (455 dt/d)
                                           SSS5
                                                                    SSffi
         1781  dt/d)
—^Centrifuge Dewaterlng.
        (455 dt/d)
                              Heat Drying


                              Anaerobic _
                              01gest10n "
                              Heat  Drying
                                                    Fertilizer Sale
                                                                        Application
                                                            (truck   of Oewatered Sludge
                                                            200 mi)
                                                    Fertilizer Sale
                                                              (truck)
                                                                    -> Sanitary Landfill
     i—^Flotation-Concentration
              (1,143 dt/d)
  10
                                                        _	__>  Land Application
                                                        (truck     Of Qewatered Sludge
                                                        or ral1,
                                                        200 mi)

                                                        Distribution
—^Flotation-Concentration-
         (665 dt/d)
     —fc.Vacuum Filter Dewaterlng
               (455 dt/d)
                                   Anaerobic
                                                (barge
                                                200 ml)
                                                   ->Land Application of Liquid  Sludge
                                                                (439 dt/d)
                                           (127 dt/d)


                                ••Heat Drying 	>. Fertilizer Sale
        Figure  1-1.    System  Operations  and  Sludge  Flows   (MSDGC 1975a)
                                            1-5

-------
ro  Cn to
Q.T- O
                                           C
                                           re
                                .O
                                3
                                                CL
                                                -o
                                                O
                                                      IO
                                                           
Ul

Ol
IO

4->
OJ

o
0.












01

I/I
o
CX.
E
o







1^
o
00










S-
01


3





u
•^







01
s_
Ol
c
Lul



4-1
(O
o.
£
t_l


c
o

4J
(O
c

£


c
o





c
o
4_,

^_

o
Q-


c
o
4->
3


O
ex.

c
0

a.
e
3
i/i

o
0

Ol
.^ IO
•i- Ol
r— -O
00 O
z:


IO


f C
Ol IO

i — in
00 J3
3
OO






O)
-d "lO
Ol i-
•r- Ol
.— -o
OO O





.c .C
Cn ol


00 01



o>
J= ^0
en i-
•t- Ol
•— T3
OO O
Jgr


OJ
fl
01
T3
O



10


C


I/I

3
t/">





IO

c
IO


o

00



2
en


00




£
en


00



Ol
10
Ol

o
z:





^
Ol

f—
oo









_^
Ol


oo



10

c
(O


.a
3
OO
10

c
fO

t/1

3
OO

o>
10
Ol
-a
o
•z.





e~
Ol

P—
OO









_c
Ol


00



10

c
(0
4-1
l/l
.a
3
OO
to
••—
c:

4^
(/I

3
OO

HI
IO
Ol
•a
o




01

IO
s-
01
•a
o
s:








j;-
01


00




o<
10

Ol
•o
o



o>
10

0)

o
s:


Ol
IO
01
-o
o
s


ro
•i—

c
10

I/I

3
OO






Ol
IO
s_
01
T3
O
s:



Ol
^0
s_
Ol
•a
o



Ol
4-*
IO

Ol

o




J=
.^
r—
00




Ol
4-1
(O
S-
01
•o

T»*








_£;
Ol


00





^
Ol


oo




jr

•r-

00



Ol
10
Ol
-o
o
s:



•r—

C
IO

I/I

3
00






0)
IO

Ol
T3






JZ
Ol


OO




.c
en


OO



Ol
10
01
-o
0
•Si



Ol

ra

01
T3
O








01
IO

o>
T3
O




^
l-O



r— tT3
*3 3
-*-> C
o c
H- 
-Q '«~



QJ
01
*""••
t/l^O
*J O

0 ^
o - —

^
o*>


00


r--.
U3


en
*rt-
OJ
^
i.
OJ
T3
O
s:

^o
o

o
^n
t^
•r-
c

LO
^1
3
CO
00
CTi

<3-
**
t/>
•i-
C
13
4_»
t/>
J3
3
LO
<\J
CO

CM
on
^/*
OJ
TO
i_
O)
-o
o
s:

en
CO

CM
CM
feO-
OJ
(O
1_
OJ
-o
o
s:

r-»
r»*

CO
CNJ
W
•i-
c
«
+->

JD
^
OO
o
tn

r^.
m
t^

-C
en


t^>


CM
LO


ro
43*>
cu
(C
s_
fU
•a
o
s:


cr>

en
*3-
•bO-
.,-
C
fT3
+J
ul
jO
3
00
en


LO
ro
t^v
                 •ol
                                  1-6

-------
C.   CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT

     This discussion of current environmental  conditions  provides base-
line information only for those present conditions that are directly
related to environmental  impacts of the project.   For instance,  popula-
tion data are excluded from this summary because  the project should not
significantly influence the population size or composition of Fulton
County.  Further, the suitability of the project  site for industrial  lo-
cation will not be covered because there will  be  little or no demand for
industrial reuse of the project site.   The topics covered are climate
and topography, geology and soils, hydrology and  water quality,  biology
and ecosystems, and socio-economic and land use settings.

     1.   Climate and Topography

          The climate of the project area is typically continental.
     The most probable weather conditions are  a neutral atmosphere (Pas-
     quill Stability Class D) and southerly winds at 10.2 mph.   Worst
     conditions, in terms of air pollution potential from sludge odors,
     are a calm atmosphere with a mixing height of less than 100 meters
     and a wind speed of less than 1 mph.  With regard to soil erosion,
     sedimentation, and water quality problems from sludge runoff, the
     24-hour, 100-year storm represents the worst condition, producing
     a rainfall of 6.53 inches.

          One consequence of the large-scale strip mining operations  in
     Fulton County is an extremely rough topography, presenting  a bar-
     rier to full land reclamation and re-use.  Strip mining has left
     steeply sloping spoil mounds which may increase the  capacity of
     storm runoff to carry suspended solids into  receiving waters.   Min-
     ing has also resulted in a number of long, narrow lakes, which have
     probably altered the distribution of thermal energy  at the  site and,
     therefore, the microclimate.  Availability of moisture from lake
     evaporation, coupled with nighttime loss  of  thermal  energy  from the
                                    1-7

-------
bare surface, may encourage the formation of ground fogs,  limit-
ing mixing in the surface layer and contributing  to accumulation
of sludge malodorants near the ground.

2.   Geology and Soils

     During surface mining, the overburden soils  and cap rock were
removed.  The subsurface of strip-mined areas consists of cohesive
fine-grained soils with pockets and discontinuous zones of boulder-
size rock.  The rearranged and redistributed overburden soils are
rather impervious, minimizing the potential  for groundwater contami-
nation from sludge, but increasing surface runoff and potential  sur-
face water contamination.  However, some zones or layers may consist
of broken shale and sandstone slabs or blocks arranged in a way  that
provides for rapid infiltration of surface water.  Such formations
create a mechanism for groundwater pollution.

     In areas where no strip mining has occurred, the glacial soils
are covered by loess.  This material is essentially impervious,  but
is subject to erosion if exposed on slopes steeper than 20%.  Mineral
deposits such as black shale, which are exposed by strip mining, cre-
ate high background levels of trace elements, compounding the poten-
tial for water pollution from sludge.  For example, both sludge  and
black shale contribute significantly to water pollution from cadmium.
While their respective contributions are additive, they cannot be
distinguished without very precise soil investigations.

3.   Hydrology and Water Quality

     Most of the surface water at the project site is drained by
Big Creek and Slug Run, a branch of Big Creek, to Spoon River, a
tributary of the Illinois River.  Surface water is an extremely
important resource in Fulton County because groundwater concentra-
tions of dissolved minerals make the groundwater an unsuitable
source for public water supply.  Steep slopes, sparse vegetative
                               1-8

-------
cover and poor soil permeability create high runoff volume and
velocity, causing erosion and stream or lake siltation which is
a hazard to aquatic biota.  The high suspended solids content of
sludge could add to this condition if it is not contained within
the application fields.

     Baseline (1971) concentrations of chloride, cadmium, chro-
mium, manganese, mercury, nickel, and zinc in streams were gen-
erally in conformance with Illinois water quality standards.
Standards were occasionally violated for sulfate, copper, and
lead.  High background levels of some heavy metals make surface
waters vulnerable to increased violations from metal additions
contributed by sludge.  Ammonia nitrogen, iron, and fecal coli-
form concentrations violated standards in Big Creek.  For in-
stance, ammonia nitrogen levels as high as 8.1 mg/1 were mea-
sured at a station on Big Creek, compared to the state standard
of 1.5 mg/1.  Concentrations of iron were as high as 4.8 mg/1,
as opposed to the standard of 1.0 mg/1.

     A study of baseline groundwater quality in the project area
indicated that concentrations of chromium, copper, iron, lead,
manganese, and nickel were within the range found elsewhere in
the United States.  Ranges of pH and zinc concentrations were
close to national values, but those of chloride, sulfate, cal-
cium, magnesium, and sodium were higher, indicating that dissolved
solids or salt concentrations were excessive.  High overall con-
centration of dissolved minerals, approximately three times the
U.S. standard of 500 ppm, could necessitate expensive treatment
of groundwater to achieve compatibility as a public water supply
source.

4.   Biology and Ecosystems

     A great variety of aquatic and terrestrial wildlife currently
inhabits the project area and fish abound in most of the local lakes,
The relevance of existing fish and wildlife to disposal  of sludge
                                1-9

-------
in their habitats is that biomagnification of toxic substances
in sludge through the food chains of wild populations  cannot
be controlled as well as in the case of domestic animals.

     Six rare and endangered animal  species are listed for U.S.
EPA Region V, containing Illinois.   Fish species are the  longjaw
Cisco and the blue pike.  Endangered birds are the arctic pere-
grine falcon and Kirtland's warbler.  Mammals are the  Indiana
bat and the eastern timber wolf.   The likelihood that  any of
these are present at the project site is extremely remote.   Ac-
cording to biologists of the Natural History Survey in Urbana,
Illinois, there are three endangered plant species which  probably
exist in the project area.  One,  an  endangered woodland species,
is Aster chasei, a woodland aster.   Two endangered prairie species
are Lespedeza leptostachya, a bush  clover found on dry prairie,
and Petalostemum foliosum, a prairie clover found near river banks,

5.   Socio-Economic and Land Use  Conditions

     Although it has been estimated  that the project will  have
only a small effect upon socio-economic conditions, socio-econo-
mic trends are important in determining the future demand for
various uses of land in the project  area.   According to present
trends, demand for farmland in Fulton County has been  decreas-
ing, and future increased demand  should be slight.   This  decline
reflects the influence of advanced  technology in replacing labor
with capital-intensive methods of production.   Local agriculture
is also changing in composition.   Dairy, winter wheat  and poultry
production are declining, while corn, soybeans, swine  and beef
cattle production have increased.  Thus, future land use  in the
project area will probably be centered more on forage  crops, pas-
ture and feedlots than plant or animal  produce.

     Suitability of strip-mined land in the project area  for
various uses is affected by topography, soils, and drainage.
Problems of settlement with unconsolidated soils in the strip-
mined sections of the project site  could make it prohibitively

                              1-10

-------
expensive to build hard surface roads, underground utilities,
and residential or industrial structures.  Current levels of
available plant nutrients and organic matter make these soils
unsuitable for intensive agriculture.  Without land reclamation
utilizing sewage sludge, any row-crop production on formerly
strip-mined fields would depend on liberal  use of costly chemi-
cal fertilizers, extensive soil conditioning, and rigorous con-
servation practices.  Steep slopes and severe problems of access
in unreclaimed strip mining areas have caused failure of previous
attempts to manage timber crops in Fulton County.

     The recreation potential of the project area would be li-
mited by poor accessibility and competition from the diverse at-
tractions in nearby Spoon River Valley, along the Illinois River,
at Dickson Mounds State Park, and in the numerous former strip-
mined areas where recreation uses are of particular interest.

     Large tracts of equally available and suitable land in Ful-
ton County are expected to keep land values low in the project
area.  According to tax assessment records, reclaimed strip-mined
lands which are used productively have been valued only 25% more
than unreclaimed lands.
                               1-11

-------
D.   SIGNIFICANT SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT

     This section summarizes the potential  socio-economic and environ-
mental effects associated with the project, and identifies observed ef-
fects whenever possible.   In the absence of documented evidence, the
assessment relies on theory such as a mathematical  model  for predicting
downwind dispersion of sludge aerosols or odorants, or on findings in-
ferred from the general scientific literature and data on projects else-
where.  The first part of this section deals with socio-economic and
land use effects, and the second part addresses environmental effects
and human or animal health effects.

     1.    Socio-Economic and Land Use Effects

          This discussion begins with an assessment of the project's
     influence on the suitability of the land for a variety of poten-
     tial uses.  The project has affected land suitability both through
     the preparation of land for sludge application, and by sludge ap-
     plication itself.  The discussion concludes with a brief descrip-
     tion of socio-economic effects of the project.

          a.   Land use effects - Levelling and grading of strip-mined
          sections of the project site to prepare the sludge application
          fields, and the removal of large rock fragments from the sur-
          face, have increased the suitability of the land for a number
          of uses.  Beyond the obvious benefits to agriculture, level-
          ling has made it possible to use farm machinery to control
          tree growth, instead of employing hand labor which is prohi-
          bitive in cost.  However, the relatively small  size and dis-
          continuity of the application fields do not lend well to large-
          scale mechanized farming.  Drainage control systems developed
          with the application fields have increased land suitability
          for potentially polluting uses, such as livestock feedlots and
          intensive crop production involving high application rates of
          fertilizers and pesticides.  The removal  of surface rocks and
                                   1-12

-------
levelling of steep slopes have also considerably increased
suitability for recreational use including playgroundss camp-
sites, recreation building sites, roads, and trails.

     Sludge application has multiple effects upon land use,
both during and after termination of its use in reclaiming
land.  Nuisances associated with sludge application have a
short-term negative influence upon residential expansion in
nearby rural settlements.  The primary nuisance is from the
odors emanating from sludge holding basins and from airborne
dispersion of sludge spray during spraying operations; the
general visual blight created by spraying sludge is another.,
Another liability is that many extremes of weather and the
presence of crops during the growing season interfere with
sludge spraying or disking, perhaps reducing loading rates
to uneconomic levels.  Crop rotation would also curtail the
amount of sludge applied.  High rates are necessary both to
economic sludge disposal and high crop yields.  In addition,
potentially toxic accumulations of certain organic compounds
and trace elements in soil from prolonged sludge application
might hinder future agricultural use of the land by affect-
ing crop yields.

     On the other hand, benefits are derived from the addition
of nutrients and organic matter to soils.  Soil enrichment may
favor future intensive row-crop farming.  It is likely that
sludge application has only slightly increased the nutrient
and organic contents in soil of the 1,000 acres of former
place land (undisturbed by strip mining), and will affect the
productivity of these presently fertile fields only marginally.
However, the impact of the project upon agricultural  activity
in Fulton County hinges on the potential productivity of the
2,382 acres of formerly strip-mined land scheduled for sludge
disposal.   The future fertility of these fields can be expected
to increase significantly with the continued application of
sludge, possibly making row-crop production economically feasible.
                          1-13

-------
     Sludge application also influences opportunities for
recreation benefit and conservation land use in a project
area.  Sludge application adds organic material and mineral
nutrients in quantities sufficient for the growth of a
greater diversity of plant species than are found on strip-
mined lands reclaimed by other methods.  Increased plant di-
versity generally leads to increased diversity in wildlife.

b.   Socio-economic effects - The most obvious short-term
local economic effect of the project has been to create
jobs for approximately 120 skilled and unskilled contract
laborers who average 6 to 8 months of employment yearly.
In 1975, the MSDGC paid approximately $890,000 to their con-
tract employees and $300,000 to their full-time staff of 23.

     The sludge application project has also affected the
local public finance by increasing future market value of
the land and the tax base.  In 1973, the MSDGC paid to Ful-
ton County roughly $102,000 in real estate taxes, which
amounted to 1.3% of total tax revenues, and $34,000 in per-
sonal property taxes which amounted to 3.4% of the total.
Land reclamation and re-use could theoretically add about
$152,450 to the market value of the 2,382 project acres of
strip-mined land scheduled for sludge application.

     Future uses of the land will not be economically inten-
sive and would generate little on-site employment and income.
Visitors to potential conservation or recreation sites could
add some local income to tourist-related retail and service
enterprises, but poor accessibility of the project area will
limit this potential.  Agricultural re-use, especially graz-
ing, would have a small multiplier effect on local employment
and income.  Feedlots could contribute to the expansion of
nearby meat packing firms.  Full reclamation and agricultural
re-use could theoretically add $100,000 to $200,000 per year
(1970 dollars) to the ultimate value of agricultural output.
                          1-14

-------
2•    Environmental and Health Effects

     Potential environmental effects of the project include air
pollution from sludge malodorants, noise from equipment, surface
and groundwater contamination from sludge runoff and seepage, and
adverse changes in the physical  and chemical  characteristics of
soils due to accumulation of minerals.   Human health effects
could result directly from the inhalation of sludge spray aero-
sols contaminated with pathogens and heavy metals, or indirectly,
through the consumption of plants or animals  similarly contami-
nated.   Data reflecting actual violations of  environmental  stand-
ards or substandard project design, as  well  as project confor-
mance,  are used to bolster judgments based on findings from simi-
lar sludge experiments elsewhere.

     a.   Odors and noise - During the  period of several years
     in which sludge application to land has  been practiced in
     Fulton County, complaints of offensive odors have arisen
     from citizens near the project site.  The Midwest Research
     Institute (MRI), under contract with the Fulton County
     Health Department, designed a program to narrow down the
     odor source to the MSDGC property, the Canton sewage treat-
     ment plant, a cattle feedlot, or the gob piles and septic
     tanks common to the area.  By comparing  the results of chro-
     matographic analysis of samples collected at both the  com-
     plaint sites and the possible sources, MRI determined  the
     probability of the odors in question originating from  MSDGC
     sources to be 0.71 or 71%.   Although the malodorants in
     sludge have not been totally identified, they probably act
     synergistically to generate an earthy smell.

          The odor impact area is contained within a circle with
     a  radius of approximately 4 to 5 miles,  including the  com-
     munities of St.  David, Bryant, Cuba, and the outskirts of
     southwest Canton.  Considering the prevailing winds and
                              1-15

-------
likely dispersion pattern of airborne odorants,  farm house-
holds along the northerly perimeter of the MSDGC property
will experience most of the odor impact.   Infrequent periods
of severe impact could result from subsidence inversion which
produces atmospheric stagnation and high  air temperature.
However, the joint frequency of a calm atmosphere, low mix-
ing height, and light wind is only 0.27%, or approximately
24 hours in a year.  Atmospheric dilution is considered in-
effective in the abatement of odor problems; it is esti-
mated to reduce odorant concentrations 4  miles downwind by
approximately two to four times, depending on weather condi-
tions.

     Although the storage of sludge is likely to contribute
substantially more odor emissions than its application to
land, the respective contributions cannot be distinguished
in atmospheric samples.  If the emission  strength of odors
at the holding basins remains the same, odor complaints will
probably continue to be raised no matter  which application
methods are employed.

     Among the different application methods, pressurized
spraying has the greatest odor potential.  This is a direct
result of the production of sludge aerosols, which tremen-
dously increases the area of air-liquid interface on which
evaporation of malodorants occurs.  The odor emission poten-
tial of aerosols generated by the sprayer is approximately
50 to 100 times greater than any of the other application
methods or from sludge-treated fields.

     Surface spreading methods reduce odor potential signi-
ficantly, because sludge aerosol formation is minimized and
the exposed sludge surface area is limited to the land sur-
face.  Of the two surface spreading techniques examined,
overland flow and infiltration-percolation, the latter has
                          1-16

-------
less odor potential.  Surface penetration methods, includ-
ing soil incorporation and soil injection, present the least
odor problems.  Neither of these techniques generates sludge
aerosols, and the exposed surface area is much less with sur-
face penetration than with surface spreading, because the
soil behaves as an odor blanket when sludge is incorporated
into it.  Between soil incorporation and soil injection, the
latter has less odor potential because injection further re-
duces exposed surface area.  One drawback in both of these
methods is their limited use during growing seasons.

     The strength of odor emissions from evaporation of
sludge applied to the soil surface and from surface ponding
is equal to that from the sludge holding basins.  The con-
sequent odor problems are short-term, however, because most
odorants in the sludge will be released into the atmosphere
within the first week after sludge application.  Nevertheless,
these short-term impacts may be prolonged and intensified dur-
ing unfavorable meteorological conditions.

     The planned 1976 changeover to sludge application by
soil penetration methods for 85% of total applications should
substantially decrease odor problems associated with sludge
application, though problems related to storage in holding ba-
sins would remain.  It should be observed that rates and sol-
ids content of sludge applied during the early period of pro-
ject development were much lower and storage time in the hold-
ing basins was much longer than planned so that the full odor
potential may be understated by past complaints.

     The only noise problems associated with the project stem
from the booster pumping station at the dock in Liverpool and
from sludge spraying units.  Noise generated at the Liverpool
barge dock increases the ambient noise level around the com-
munity of Liverpool.  Tractors and sludge sprayers generate
                          1-17

-------
noise that is detected by sensitive receptors when they are
in operation near the boundary of the project property.  How-
ever, noise impacts are not severe; existing agricultural
noise has similar effect.

b.   Surface and qroundwater pollution - Chemical  and biolog-
ical water quality data were collected from various monitor-
ing stations on streams, reservoirs, and runoff retention
basins.   Pollutant concentrations violating Illinois water
quality standards were recorded at both background and non-
background stream quality monitoring stations with respect
to sulfate, copper, iron, lead, manganese,  and total dis-
solved solids.   Fecal coliform concentrations also violated
the Illinois standard, notably along Big Creek.   Runoff over
strip-mined areas and sludge application fields is most likely
responsible for poor stream water quality.   Sewage treatment
p;Tant and septic tank effluents, among other local pollution
sources, also contribute.  The established  monitoring program
is incapable of revealing these respective  sources.  Substan-
dard water quality has also been documented for reservoirs at
the project site.  Reservoir water quality  parameters regis-
tering below state standards include sulfate, copper, iron,
lead, manganese, mercury, and total dissolved solids; these
violations generally parallel  those for stream waters.

     The inadequate design and management of many runoff re-
tention basins  is indicated to be one of the major causes  of
surface water contamination.  The operating permit issued  by
the Illinois EPA specifies retention basin  effluent standards
for total suspended solids (TSS), biological oxygen demand
(BOD), and fecal coliform concentrations.  Basin effluents
that were below standards for TSS and BOD are known to have
been discharged into receiving waterways.  Even when standards
are met by averaging the pollutant concentrations, peak con-
centrations ten times the specified averages occur for all
                          1-18

-------
three parameters.  Short-term irreversible biotic effects
such as a  fish  kill or decimation of benthos can result from
such peak  concentrations.

     The runoff basins were  (meant to be constructed) to pro-
vide a retention capacity for runoff from a 100-year storm.
From the available data, it  was determined that numerous re-
tention basins  could not contain 100-year storm runoff, and
others could not contain even 25-year storm runoff.  Runoff
basins that are deficient in capacity are particularly in-
effective  in removing suspended solids, resulting in silta-
tion and excess dissolved oxygen depletion in the receiving
waterways  and reservoirs.  This is evidenced by the numerous
violations of TSS and BOD standards for retention basin ef-
fluents.   Also, reservoir violations of standards for total
phosphorus and  inorganic nitrogen and both stream and reser-
voir violations of the Illinois standard for total dissolved
solids (TDS) point to the incapacity of retention basins for
removing dissolved solids.  These include nutrients from
sludge which could contribute to the eutrophication of reser-
voirs and  their receiving waterways, thus threatening aquatic
life.

     Groundwater samples taken from wells and springs in the
project area have not clearly indicated any contamination re-
sulting from sludge.  Low rates of sludge application and low
solids content  of applied sludge during project development
years, low soil permeability and biochemical soil filtering
of sludge  have  favored the protection of well or spring water.
However* a 1971 survey indicated contamination from natural
geochemical sources, presumably by runoff and leachate from
strip mined area.   Since many of the heavy metal  contaminants
are found  in both strip mine spoil  and sewage sludge,  ground
water resources will  be increasingly vulnerable to pollution
by runoff and leaching as sludge loading rates are increased.
                          1-19

-------
c.   Soil  contamination - Due to the paucity of data,  im-
pacts on soil  quality resulting from the project cannot be
defined rigorously, but can be surmised on the basis of
general knowledge and studies of similar projects.   The ef-
fects of sludge upon soil will vary with soil  type, sludge
properties, and application rates.   The effects of sludge
properties and application rates on a specific soil type
must be studied under actual conditions, because the data
required to accurately predict effects are inadequate.

     In general, sludge has a beneficial effect upon the
physical properties of soils.  The  high organic content of
sludge provides a matrix for the formation of a stable soil
structure.  Increased aggregate stability results in in-
creased infiltration and permeability rates, increased poro-
sity, and decreased bulk density, all of which tend to re-
duce erosion potential, encourage good soil aeration,  and
favor aerobic over anaerobic soil conditions.

     Although there is conflicting  evidence, it is suspec-
ted that high concentrations of soluble salts in the sludge
may affect soil chemistry and plant growth, possibly caus-
ing excessive plant uptake of toxic materials or trace me-
tals.  The trace elements in municipal wastes may occur
largely in association with complex organic polyanions.
This interaction between heavy metals and humic, polymeric
substances in the sludge and soil may have a profound effect
upon the mobility and toxicity of metal ions when sewage
sludge is applied to agricultural soils.

     Chemical analyses of soils at other sludge application
sites have disclosed that accumulations of trace elements do
occur and that most trace elements  should be monitored, with
particular emphasis placed upon cadmium, chromium, copper,
lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc.  Cadmium poses the greatest
                         1-20

-------
hazard, and both cadmium and copper appear in greater soil
concentrations on project strip-mined lands than in place
lands.  Although data concerning organic compounds (such as
pesticides) in the sludge and soils associated with the pro-
ject are absent, other studies have shown that contamination
from this source should not be excluded from the list of po-
tential hazards.  The Illinois Cooperative Extension Service
has observed that other experiments also suggest that a long-
term build-up of heavy metals should be the limiting factor
in sludge loading rates, rather than the efficient utilization
of nutrients which may prove a lesser limitation in the long
run.

d.   Direct health effects - Among all methods of sludge ap-
plication, pressurized spraying offers the greatest potential
for direct transfer of hazardous components to humans or ani-
mals.  Inhalation of sludge aerosols possibly containing path-
ogens or toxic substances presents an opportunity for pro-
tracted and repetitive exposure and does not necessarily stimu-
late preventive action by those at risk.  Assessing the risks
associated with the inhalation of airborne particles is an ex-
tremely difficult task because of the absence of data concern-
ing the nature and concentration of pathogens in the sludge,
as sprayed, the virulence of these pathogens after downwind
transport, and the number of inhaled organisms required for
human and animal infection.  Any evaluation of direct health
hazards in Fulton County must therefore be a matter of judg-
ment based on indirect evidence.

     In any case, there is no doubt that the influent wastes
at treatment plants contain a wide range of pathogens, in-
cluding some viruses  that are not totally destroyed by treat-
ment and holding in the storage basins.

     The most useful indirect information concerning the
Fulton County project is the absence of reported ill  effects.
                         1-21

-------
Negative evidence of effects on health correlates with ex-
perience elsewhere, but may indicate only that the level  of
risk is low, rather than nonexistent.   For instance,  future
high levels of pathogens or toxic substances in the sprayed
sludge could result from a severe epidemic, changed indus-
trial processes, defective treatment plant operation  or ab-
breviated sludge holding time.   In addition, this negative
evidence is based on the absence of conspicuous ill effects
rather than an active medical search for indicators.

     A theoretical estimate of daily human respiratory in-
take of sludge particles, using a dispersion model and the
meteorological conditions and sludge composition peculiar
to the project, yields an intake of mercury well in excess
of the World Health Organization (WHO) limit under worst
weather conditions.  The estimate assumed a sludge applica-
tion rate of 2.25 dry tons per acre, and applied to dis-
tances of 250 to 1,150 meters from the source to the  re-
ceptor.  However, the WHO limits apply to continued daily
intake.  While sprayer operators at the site could sustain
prolonged exposure, it is doubtful that such exposure could
occur downwind beyond the site perimeter.

e.   Indirect health effects - Indirect effects are caused
by the consumption of plants or animals that have been con-
taminated by heavy metals.  The interactions among sludge
components and the food chain are complex and information
concerning the ability of each trophic level to accumulate
toxic compounds and pass them on to succeeding trophic le-
vels is sparse and qualitative at best.

     Separate studies have shown that trace elements  avail-
able for plant uptake can accumulate in soils.  Trace ele-
ment uptake, particularly of cadmium and zinc, has been
proven in corn and soybeans grown on sludge-treated land  in
Fulton County.  Data on grasses, including wheat and rye,
                         1-22

-------
show a large variation in mineral uptake.  What little data
exist indicate that bioaccumulation of most trace elements
does not occur in most types of livestock tissue.  Bioaccumu-
lation of elements such as cadmium is, however, known to oc-
cur in the kidney and liver of domestic animals.  In addition,
high concentration of sludge contents found in forage samples
irrigated with sludge indicate that ingestion of forage may
pose a significant problem to animals.  Direct ingestion of
dirt containing high levels of trace metals could present a
significant hazard to low grazers such as sheep and to rooters
such as swine.

     Effects of sludge application on wild birds have not
been investigated as far as can be determined.  However, earth-
worms have been shown to accumulate heavy metals like cadmium,
and adverse effects on birds that consume these worms are likely.
An important consideration here is that the access of wild birds
to sludge-treated lands cannot be controlled.

     Evaluation of human health hazards resulting from in-
gestion of trace metals presents many problems.  Susceptibi-
lity to specific mineral toxicities varies from individual to
individual and so does the efficiency of digestion and absorp-
tion, which controls body loads of any component.  The variety
of foods that are normally consumed tends to dilute high le-
vels of a particular food constituent.  Another area of uncer-
tainty is the possible localization of a dietary component in
specific tissues or organs, which has the net effect of mul-
tiplying existing body loads.  The most likely suspects for
potential hazard are arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and se-
lenium.  Both sludge and soil at the project site are high in
cadmium, especially in relation to zinc.  Cadmium enrichment
may be the most limiting single factor in sludge loading rates.

     The actual  indirect hazard to humans would stem from
the future use of reclaimed strip-mined  land for cropping or
                        1-23

-------
livestock grazing, possibly resulting in consumption of ac-
cumulated trace elements.   A family living in a rural  or
semi-rural atmosphere may  derive food from their own garden
or livestock, in which case a majority of their food intake
might come directly or indirectly from reclaimed land.   There
would be no significant hazard to humans from future conser-
vation and recreation uses of land such as hunting, fishing
and prairie development.
                        1-24

-------
E.    MITIGATIVE AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES

     Mitigative measures include those applicable to all potential
problems, those that pertain to a few, and those that are specific  to
one problem.  The most obvious and universal measure that can be taken
to avoid adverse environmental effects is to improve the quality of the
sewage sludge applied to the land.  This section first addresses the qual-
ity of sludge associated with the project, as this is basic to any  im-
pact, and then discusses measures to prevent or ameliorate the adverse
environmental effects noted in the previous section.  It concludes  by
identifying data gaps and suggesting improvements in monitoring and re-
search to increase the experimental value and decrease the risks of the
Fulton County project.

     1.    Sludge Quality

          It is evident that providing more advanced treatment at the
     MSDGC treatment plants to remove excess heavy metals would de-
     crease hazards associated with salt enrichment of soils and human
     intake of heavy metals by aerosol inhalation and consumption of
     contaminated plant and animal produce.  However, as this is pre-
     sently very costly, advanced treatment or industrial pre-treatment
     will not be considered in this report.

          To minimize the potential for adverse environmental effects
     resulting from the project, sludge quality standards are specified
     in  the operating permit issued to the MSDGC.  The quality of sludge
     from the Lawndale lagoons and from the West-Southwest (WSW) treat-
     ment plant was compared with applicable standards.   As of May  1975,
     the sludge from the Lawndale lagoons had violated alkalinity stan-
     dards 9.5% of the time.  Sludge from the WSW plant  had violated
     standards for total volatile solids 3.8% of the time, alkalinity
     standards 1.1% of the time, and pH standards 1.3% of the time.

          Environmental  effects from substandard sludge  per se cannot
     be  assessed because the sludge actually applied may have very
                                   1-25

-------
different characteristics, depending on time in storage, mixing
with supernatant, and so forth.   However,  any air pollution from
sludge odors and aerosolization  and contamination of surface wa-
ter, groundwater, and soil from  sludge application to land would
be complicated and abetted by continued shipment of subgrade sludge.
It is important to consider that any adverse environmental effects
estimated from previous sludge applications may substantially under-
state their potential because the pollutant concentrations in sludge
applied during the past developmental  period have been atypically
low.  Also, average retention time in  the  holding basins has been
much longer than planned.

     A procedure should be implemented to  ensure that only good
quality sludge is shipped  to Fulton County.   If necessary, substan-
dard sludge must be stored prior to shipment until  its quality con-
forms with required standards.  The capacity of the holding basins
provides for a sufficiently long storage time, which should guaran-
tee the destruction of pathogens in the sludge, but this does not
alleviate the potential for odor problems, especially those asso-
ciated with substandard sludge.   Therefore, prolonged storage of
sludge in the Lawndale lagoons prior to shipment to Fulton County
is recommended as a mitigative measure. Because of icing at the
lagoons during winter months, sludge consigned to Fulton County is
drawn directly from the WSW digesters.
2.   Mitigative Measures

     Many of the environmental  problems associated with the project
could be avoided by eliminating spraying as an application method.
Aerosolization from sludge spraying is a major source of odor, be-
cause volatilization from aerosols is extremely rapid.   Spraying
is also the main vehicle for direct adverse effects on  human health
caused by the inhalation of contaminated aerosols.  Eliminating
spraying would substantially reduce the amount of sludge coating on
pasture grasses, and would therefore reduce the ingestion of sludge
by grazing animals.
                             1-26

-------
     Steps are being taken by the MSDGC toward the goal of elimi-
nating spraying, which is scheduled to account for only 15% of to-
tal applications in 1976.  Until or unless spraying can be elimi-
nated entirely, there are certain practices that will reduce poten-
tial impacts.  Reducing spray pressure reduces sludge aerosoliza-
tion, and reducing the height and inclination of the sprayer gun
reduces the portion of sprayed sludge remaining airborne.   In all
cases, the sludge sprayer should be operated under conditions fa-
voring dispersion and the viable decay of microorganisms:   low
windspeed, high turbulence, warm temperature, and bright daylight.
Spraying should be avoided when the atmosphere is stable,  air is
cool, and the sky is overcast or dark.

     Odor generation is a difficult problem, especially for odors
originating from the sludge holding basins.  White-capping at the
surface of the basins due to high wind promotes sludge aerosoliza-
tion, which is one of the major mechanisms for odor generation.
The use of wind barriers such as tall, dense hedgerows or  fences
around the holding basins could reduce surface turbulence  and wave
action.   The present requirement of a 4-foot freeboard from the
sludge surface to the top of the berm provides baffling only for
a short distance downwind.  The use of floating wind baffles within
the basins might prove an effective measure for controlling surface
turbulence and, therefore, odor.  Odor generation from the holding
basins might also be reduced by the use of chemicals that  suppress
evaporation or mask malodorants.  These two methods have not been
proven economically or technically, but, if found to be effective
without adverse environmental effects, could be used during un-
favorable weather conditions when odor propagation is greatest.

     Odors originating from sludge applied to the soil  can be con-
trolled by using methods of application that reduce the surface
area of sludge exposed to the atmosphere.   Soil  incorporation by
disking  or, better yet,  soil  injection (see Figure 1-2) is con-
sidered  to be most effective in reducing odor potential because
                             1-27

-------
the top layer of soil  acts as an odor blanket.   In addition,  sludge
ponding in the application fields should be disallowed or certainly
kept at a minimum.   Ponding can be reduced by increasing the  number
of application runs and allowing one week to elapse between succes-
sive runs.
Figure  1-2.    Injection Unit  Showing  Three Injectors (MSDGC, 1975h)

     To control surface water contamination, the effectiveness
of runoff retention basins must be upgraded so that effluents
meet required standards for total  suspended solids and biological
oxygen demand.  Retarding  runoff velocity and erosion by planting
grass, sufficient recycling to the fields of substandard basin ef-
fluents, increasing the capacity of runoff basins, providing addi-
tional basins, or combinations of these measures are necessary to
achieve required effluent  quality.

     One v/ay to prevent adverse soil  effects is by improving the
quality of sludge before application.   While the organic matter
in sludge is highly beneficial to soil building on strip-mined
                             1-28

-------
land in the short run, the long-term soil adsorptivity of min-
erals and nutrients can become saturated, dependinq on avail-
ability to plants and their actual uptake.  The results are
groundwater pollution and reduced crop yields due to soil
mineralization and leaching.  Accumulation of toxic substances
in the soil is significant in relation to possible uptake by
plants and direct or subsequent ingestion by animals.

     It is difficult to suggest explicit mitigative measures for
regulating potential indirect health effects because this area
is so vague.  The only certain action that can be taken to avoid
indirect human health effects is to prevent humans from consum-
ing grain and vegetable crops, domestic livestock, and fish or
wildlife raised on sludge-treated lands.  This would, of course,
inhibit future re-use of the land for cropping, grazing, hunting
and fishing, which is inconsistent with some goals of land recla-
mation.

3.   Monitoring and Research Programs

     Implementation of the preventive and mitigative measures sug-
gested above will certainly help to minimize adverse environmental
effects.  However, the general insufficiency of data makes the as-
sessment or prediction of impacts uncertain and incomplete in most
areas.  Therefore, it is also recommended that a much more thorough
evaluation of the actual hazards or risks be provided through an
expanded program of monitoring and research.

     An independent agency should collect, process, evaluate and
publish all existing and future performance data pertaining to the
project in cooperation with the Sanitary District, the Illinois
EPA,  the University of Illinois, and other interested parties.
An improved research and monitoring program covering sludge, sur-
face and groundwater, atmosphere, soils, crops and livestock, na-
tural habitats, and fish and wildlife should be formulated and
carried out.  Relevant research findings would be available at
                              1-29

-------
least one year in advance of any major  change  in  sludge  process-
ing, shipping, storage and spreading  practices  and  allied  agricul

tural and conservation practices.


     Specifically,  several sections of  project  land should be

reserved for the evaluation of:
          Inorganic and organic  constituents  of strip-mined
          land prior to levelling,  after  levelling,  after ini-
          tial high sludge  application  rates,  and  on a yearly
          basis thereafter

          Effects of different application  rates upon ground-
          water quality and plant  uptake  to identify upper
          limits of sustained soil  holding  capacity  and  crop
          yields

          Inorganic and organic  sludge  components  found  in
          crops and natural  vegetation  and  in  both wild  and
          domestic animals  introduced or  raised on the pro-
          ject site

          Changes occurring when sludge application  discon-
          tinues, such as decomposition of  organic matter
          and leaching of heavy  metals.
     In addition, monitoring  programs  should  be  carefully  imple-
mented in the following areas:
          Biological  and chemical  analysis  of  sludge,  includ-
          ing bacterial  and viral  loads,  upon  leaving  the treat-
          ment plants and directly before sludge  application

          Sampling of air downwind of remaining  spraying  opera-
          tions to determine peak  concentrations  of  pathogens,
          under conditions favoring a risk  (low  temperature,
          stable atmosphere, light wind,  overcast day)

          Analysis of the nutrient and total  dissolved  solids
          (IDS) concentrations  in  effluents from  runoff reten-
          tion basins to determine nutrient and  IDS  inputs into
          receiving waterways and  reservoirs where eutrophica-
          tion may occur

          Identification of the contaminant source whenever
          high levels are noted in wells, streams and  reser-
          voirs, to ensure the  effective  performance of the
          control measures
                             1-30

-------
     •    Approximation of groundwater flow pattern and ve-
          locity, using tracers introduced to upstream wells,
          as aid to pollution source identification

     •    Separate and periodic detection of available as well
          as total soil elements particularly in the root zone,
          and potentially toxic organics (such as pesticides)
          as well as trace elements

     •    Segregation of project and background effects to iso-
          late natural and man-made pollution, especially heavy
          metals, biological  oxygen demand and fecal coliforms,
          from geochemical sources, strip-mining activities and
          community waste disposal

     •    Analysis of public  health records and data on indus-
          trial discharges, to provide a better understanding
          of the original inputs into the wastewater system.
     As far as human health hazards from indirect causes are con-

cerned, future land use of strip-mined areas reclaimed by sludge

application should be regulated.   The listing below summarizes

the best, worst, and average circumstances associated with human

health hazards as a function of future land use:


                           Worst Case

     t    Sale of land to farm operators who live on the
          premises and raise their own food with  no moni-
          toring or controls.

     0    Rural  housing development where residents garden
          with no monitoring controls.


                            Best Case

     •    Land remains in hands of the MSDGC with rental to
          farmers, providing management and monitoring con-
          trols.

     •    Land developed for outdoor recreation,  prairie
          preservation, and tree farms.


                          Average Case

     •    Land remains in hands of the MSDGC until  hazards
          are defined; crop or pasture land is  rented to
          farmers with management control.


                              1-31

-------
     t    Land remains  in hands  of the MSDGC  until  hazards
          are defined;  crop or pasture land  is  rented  to
          farmers  without management  control,  but all  pro-
          duce is  sampled and tested  prior to  release.
     •    Development of confined  livestock  operations  for
          beef cattle or swine;  produce is sampled  and  test-
          ed prior to release.
     •    Land is  developed as fish and wildlife preserve
          with hunting  and fishing allowed after establish-
          ing zero hazard level; management  and monitoring
          controls are  provided.
     In spite of its potential  environmental  hazards,  the Ful-
ton County project has already  produced tangible benefits as-
sociated with sludge application to land.   Levelling and remov-
al of rock from strip-mined land to prepare for sludge applica-
tion have increased the suitability of the site for mechanized
agriculture and for recreational use.   Drainage control  systems
developed with the application  fields  have increased land suit-
ability for livestock feedlots  and intensive  crop production
requiring high rates of fertilizer and pesticide application.
Undoubtedly, the addition of sludge has beneficially affected
the physical properties of project soils.   The application of
sludge to strip-mined land will increase the mineral nutrients
in soils and help to condition the soil for more intensive
uses.  In the prairie area these minerals  should help to support
a greater diversity of plant life.  An obvious benefit of the
project has been the creation of jobs for approximately 120 skilled
and unskilled contract laborers.

     The Fulton County project could serve as a research area for
assessing the benefits and drawbacks of applying sewage sludge to
strip-mined land.  The project, if carefully and thoroughly moni-
tored and evaluated as an experimental large-scale prototype of
strip mine  land reclamation, could help immensely to ensure en-
vironmentally sound recycling instead of burning and burying
wastewater  solids.  Convertion of waste to fertilizer and waste
land to fertile land is basic to future environmental  policy and
deserves more consideration.
                            1-32

-------
                    II.   BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

     After briefly discussing the general aspects of sludge disposal
on land, this chapter presents a concise overview of the Fulton County
project itself.  Its political and legal aspects, such as policy issues
and current litigation, and its physical development goals are summarized.
The socio-economic and environmental basis for the geographic planning
area of the project is examined.  The applicable operating permits and
standards are reviewed.  Also included are descriptions of interacting
programs for sludge utilization such as the Big Bluestem Program.  The
wastewater treatment and sludge disposal systems that are presently opera-
ted by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (MSDGC) are
highlighted.

A.   PROJECT BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW

     This section is divided into three parts.  The first is a general
discussion of the utilization of sewage sludge on agricultural land.  In-
cluded are descriptions of sewage sludge characteristics, sludge applica-
tion rates and methods, crop response to sludge, and the benefits and possi-
ble problems associated with this method of sludge disposal.  The second
part traces the history of the Fulton County Prairie Plan program and ad-
dresses the meaning of the goal of "reclamation".  The third part discusses
three associated programs, two dealing with actual sludge utilization and
a third providing inter-agency and community liaison in executing the Prairie
Plan.

     1.   Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Land

          Sewage sludge is frequently a surplus commodity of municipali-
     ties and has in some cases accumulated in amounts large enough to pose
     severe problems of storage and disposal.  Environmental and economic
     constraints limit disposal methods.  However, if applied to soil at a
     rate equivalent to modern irrigation,digested sewage sludge will sup-
     ply many plant nutrients in the amounts needed for a growing crop and
                                    II-l

-------
will also improve soil  properties.   Utilization on agricultural  land
therefore appears to be an attractive solution from the standpoint of
cost to the municipality for disposal  as  well  as cost of nutrients and
organic matter needed to renovate and fertilize depleted or barren land.
Benefits and problems associated with the use  of sewage sludge on agri-
cultural land are discussed in this  section.

     a.   Characteristics of Sewage  Sludge - The term "sludge",
     as applied to this study, refers  to  anaerobically digested
     sewage sludge, a stablized material  with  an earthy odor.   Li-
     quid sewage sludge is brown-to-blackish in color and contains
     dissolved, colloidal, and suspended  solids.   Its characteristics
     depend to a great  extent on the source of the original  waste,
     especially the types of industries contributing wastewater,  the
     treatment provided and the handling  of sludge and a variety  of
     other factors.

          Liquid sewage sludge may vary from less  than 1% solids  to
     more than 10%, but most sludges contain 2 to  5% solids  as they
     finish the treatment process.   The solid  portion is composed of
     approximately equal  amounts of  inorganic  and  organic materials.
     The inorganic portion is largely fine particles having  the  tex-
     ture of silt and clay, and contains  mainly nitrogen, phosphorous,
     sulfur, chlorine,  carbonates, and metal salts.   The organic  por-
     tion is a complex  mixture of constituents comprising organic
     carbon, nitrogen,  phosphorous,  and sulfur.

          Table II-l gives a range of the chemical composition of
     sludge and specifications for a "typical" liquid, digested  sew-
     age sludge as it flows from the digester.  The composition  of
     different batches  of sludge can vary appreciably from the values
     shown; these are given only as  a general  guideline.  Not all of
     the nitrogen in sewage sludge  is available to crops during  the
     year of application.  Some may  be lost by volatilization or leach-
     ing, and the remaining organic  nitrogen must  be mineralized be-
     fore it can be assimilated by  crops.  Also, nearly all  of the
                               II-2

-------
       Table II-l.
Composition of  Fresh, Anaerobically  Digested
Sewage Sludge  (Illinois Cooperative  Extension
Service,  1975)
Element
       Concentration
      	range
                                                         Typical sludge (dry basis)
Concentration
Anoint
                                  percent
Elements essential for plants
Nitrogen-organic.  »	   2 to 5
Nitrogen-ammonium  	   1 to 3
(Nitrogen-total).  .	(1 to 6)
Phosphorus-as  P	8 to 6
(Phosphorus as PzOs)	
Potassium-as K	1 to .7
(Potassium as  K"20)	
Calcium	   1 to 8
Magnesium	   5 to 2
Sulfur	3 to 1.5
Iron	1 to 5

                                   PP">	
Sodium	800 to 4,000
Zinc	50 to 50,000
Copper	200 to 17,000
Manganese	100 to 800
Boron	15 to 1,000

Elements not essential for plants
Cadmium	   3 to 3,000
Lead	100 to 10,000
Mercury	   1 to 100
Chromium	50 to 30,000
Nickel	25 to 8,000
                                 percent
                                   2
                                  (5)

                                  C6.8)
                                    .4
                                   (-5)
                                   3
                                   1
                                    .9
                                   4
                                  2,000
                                  5,000
                                  1,000
                                  500
                                  100
                                  150
                                  1,000
                                  3
                                  3,000
                                  400
                       pounds/ton
                            60
                            40
                           (100)
                            60
                           (137)
                             8
                            (10)
                            60
                            20
                            18
                            80
                             4
                            10
                             2
                             1
                              .2
                             .5
                             2
                           Trace
                             6
                           0.8
VOTE: Values  vary according to source,  treatment, andother factors. Sludges held in storage
lagoons for long periods may he considerably lower in nitrogen content.
                                         II-3

-------
minor and trace elements can be toxic at some concentration;
their availability to plants depends on soil  properties, crop
varieties, and many other factors.

b.   Application Methods and Rates - Handling the large volume
of water required to convey the sludge nutrients needed by a
growing crop imposes some restrictions on the methods used for
applying liquid sludge.   A sludge containing  solids of 6% or less
can be handled as a liquid, pumped through pipes, and carried
in tank trucks, railroad tank cars, and barges.   Although there
are limitations on the type of pump used, sludge can generally
be handled by the equipment used for spreading liquid manure.
Sludge with .nore than 10% solids may require  special equipment
to deal with high viscosity.  Dewatered sludge may be handled
as solid manure.

     Liquid sludge can be sprayed through large-diameter irri-
gation nozzles.  It can be spread in furrows  through gated irri-
gation pipe.  In spite of the high water content of liquid sludge,
it is not a satisfactory substitute source for irrigation water
because even a minimal rate of irrigation would  supply nutrients
and salts at levels potentially toxic to crops.

     Li uid sludge can be spread on the soil  by  tank trucks.
The hauling distance is obviously limited by  the large weight of
the water that is handled.  In some present operations in Illinois,
sludge is pumped through a flexible hose to an injection plow travel
ling through the field.   At the plow, sludge  flows through a mani-
fold which connects with outlets at each plowshare or disc.   Sludge
can thus be incorporated immediately into the soil.  It is neces-
sary that caution be exercised in applying sludge to sloping land
to insure that runoff water does not contaminate streams and other
bodies of water.
                          II-4

-------
     Application rates are specified in terms of inches  of
     liquid (as for rain or irrigation water), tons of liquid
     per acre, or tons of dry solids per acre.  A layer  of
     liquid sludge 1 inch deep amounts to about 27,000 gal-
     lons (100 tons) on each acre covered.   If the sludge has
     3 percent solids, 3 tons of dry solids will be added to
     each acre by each 1-inch application.   At 5 percent ni-
     trogen and 3 percent phosphorus, this  sludge will supply
     300 pounds of total nitrogen and 180 pounds of phosphorus
     per acre.  If the sludge had 5 percent solids, the  1-inch
     layer over an acre would still weigh about 100 tons, but
     would contain 5 tons of dry solids and furnish 500  pounds
     of total nitrogen and 300 pounds of total phosphorus per
     acre.  (Illinois Cooperative Extension Service, 1975)
     In determining the correct application rate to satisfy
crop requirements for nutrients, many variables must be taken
into consideration.  For example, the percentages of specific
nutrient concentrations that are in a form available for plant
uptake, the loss of elements from leaching through the soil,  and
the mineralization or immobilization of elements after applica-
tion must be determined.  An application rate that is suitable for
one constituent of sludge might be unsuitable for another,  caus-
ing either nutrient deficiency or toxicity.  In addition, the con-
tribution of trace elements, especially heavy metals, may limit
the long-range disposal of sludge on agricultural lands.

     Sewage sludge is particularly well adapted for use on  strip
mined lands where the topsoil has not been replaced.  Most  of the
soils there are high in potassium but low in nitrogen, phosphorous,
some micronutrients, and organic matter; sewage sludge is an  ex-
cellent source for these components.  With sludge application,
there is the option of going directly into row crop production
after the levelling of strip mine spoil banks.   There is a  lower
likelihood of phosphorous toxicity from heavy application rates
since these soils are so low in phosphorous.

     Application rates must be specified according to the analy-
sis of the sludge being used, and sufficient sampling must  be done
to measure variability in composition over a reasonable period of
time.
                          II-5

-------
c.   Crop Response - The University of Illinois has conducted re-
search concerning crop responses to liquid,  anaerobically digested
sewage sludge since 1967.   When sludge was  spread in furrows be-
tween rows of corn, it was  found that corn yields generally in-
creased in direct proportion to the amount  of sludge applied.  The
corn was grown on poorly drained soil  low in organic matter.  The
organic matter in the surface soil  was increased in proportion to
the quantity of sludge applied the  preceding year.

     Soybean responses to  sludge were evaluated in  the  same man-
ner, and yields were found  to generally increase with the amount
of sludge applied.  The only problems to develop in the course
of the experiment were symptoms of  phosphorous  toxicity and excess
soluble salt in the plants  receiving the greatest application of
sludge.  However, when the  excess salts were leached out by rain-
fall, the problem of phosphorous toxicity was alleviated.

     A field experiment was set up  on the University of Illinois
Vegetable Research Farm in  Mason County in  1974 to  compare sludge,
manure, and an inorganic fertilizer as nutrient sources for corn.
Only two replications were  performed and only one year's data are
available, but the results  for sludge use are encouraging.   Yields
of corn as high as 157 bushels per  acre were obtained from 2 inches
of sludge applied in furrows between the rows after planting.   Simi-
lar yields '"ere obtained from conventional fertilizer application
techniques.

     While crops grown on  sandy soils might  benefit most from
     the use of an organic  fertilizer source such as sewage
     sludge, we do not yet  have enough experience with  sludge
     on these soils to know whether additional  problems may re-
     sult.  These soils have low base exchange capacities; and,
     consequently, may have a low capability for holding metal
     ions.  Hence, toxicity problems could  occur much sooner
     from repeated applications. Also, nitrogen leaching may
     occur to a greater extent with a resultant increase in pol-
     lution hazards.  These things  are being studied.  (Illinois
     Cooperative Extension Service, 1975)
                          II-6

-------
d.   Added Benefits and Possible Problems - Sludge provides a
source of organic matter that may be beneficial in many soils,
particularly those low in organic matter, such as sandy soils or
previously strip-mined lands.  Organic matter is beneficial in
holding plant nutrients in the soil  complex and in facilitating
their slow release.  Improved structure and water-holding char-
acteristics result from an increase in soil organic matter when
it is at a low level (under 3%).

     The application of sludge to agricultural lands also poses
some problems.  Odors from sludge can create problems under cer-
tain circumstances.  Persons living  adjacent to areas where sludge
is applied to land or stored in basins may frequently complain of
objectionable odors.  If the sewage  sludge has not been thoroughly
processed, the resulting odors may be very noticeable.  In addition,
when sludge is held in lagoons, the  upper layers of liquid become
high in ammonia and some is lost to  the atmosphere.  The MSDGC has
returned to Chicago much of the supernatant liquid from their hold-
ing basins to alleviate this problem.   Odor problems can be partially
alleviated by minimizing the surface area and the retention time of
the sludge in holding basins, and by injecting the liquid sludge in-
to the soil rather than spraying it  on the surface.

     According to the Illinois Cooperative Extension Service,
sludge high in soluble salts, if applied in large amounts,
can retard seed germination and plant growth and adversely af-
fect soil  structure.  However, sludge generally has a low ratio
of sodium to calcium and magnesium,  indicating a low absorption
of sodium.   The sodium that-is absorbed by soils tends to be
leached out in humid areas where there is an annual net movement
of water down through the soil profile.  There seems to be lit-
tle cause for concern about soluble  salts in Illinois, provid-
ing that sludge is applied at agronomic rates (not exceeding
the utilization of nutrients by crops).
                           II-7

-------
     Many of the concerns about long-term sludge application have
centered around the trace metals in sludge.   The elements of most
concern are zinc, copper, nickel, and cadmium; but such concern ex-
tends to mercury, lead, boron, chromium,  cobalt, selenium, and
molybdenum.  The fear is that repeated applications of sludge might
build up concentrations of these elements in the soil to levels
toxic to crops; also that metals absorbed by plants could enter
the food chain at undesirable levels.  In addition, these elements
remain bound in the soil, and any problems they create are diffi-
cult to correct.   The University of Illinois has sponsored re-
search in an attempt to follow the transfer of trace elements into
the food chain, and studies made so far provide little evidence to
warrant concern about detrimental trace-metal accumulations in soils
or plants where municipal sludges are applied at agronomic rates.

     There has been serious concern that  sewage sludge might con-
tain pathogens and that animal and human  health problems might re-
sult from sludge utilization.  However, University of Illinois
studies have shown that viruses are unlikely to survive a period of
15 days in a heated anaerobic digester, at least in a condition
capable of causing an infection.  Much the same situation was found
for several kinds of parasites.

     In regard to nitrogen, it was found  that both the rate of
nitrogen transformation to nitrate and the movement through soil
are the same, regardless of the source.  Phosphorous poses some-
what more of a problem, in that phosphorus added to soils as a
sludge constituent appears to be highly available to crops.  Hence,
it is possible for available phosphorus to accumulate in soils to
toxic levels for sensitive crops if sludge application rates are
high.  Also, the levels of phosphorus in  drainage water may possi-
bly increase to the point of posinq a eutrophication threat when
drainage water is returned to non-flowing surface waters.  However,
these problems are not expected to result as long as agronomic
rates of sludge application are not exceeded.
                            II-8

-------
2.   Project History and Issues

     This section presents a summary of the events leading to the Fulton
County project (the Prairie Plan) and the rationale behind the executive
decisions that were made.  A definition of "reclamation" as the goal of
the project is discussed, and there is a brief summary of the environ-
mental litigation resulting from the project.  Also, the related acti-
vities of several allied programs are described.

     a.   History and Policy Matters - Fulton County citizens have been
     concerned about the effects of strip mining in the County for many
     years.  The first collective action was taken in 1970, when the
     County Board of Supervisors and the State's Attorney's Office formed
     a special citizens commitstee.  This group discussed the pending strip
     mine landfill proposal in Livingston County and Stark County, and
     directed the State's Attorney to investigate the feasibility of such
     a project in Fulton County.

          It was apparent from studies of the landfill project that, al-
     though it would effectively level the mined area, some measures
     would have to be taken to modify the inorganic mine spoil material
     covering the landfill.  It was then that the use of digested sew-
     age sludge for soil rehabilitation was proposed.  Subsequently, the
     County Planning Administrator and the County Board members investi-
     gated the sludge project underway in Arcola to determine whether
     Fulton County should consider such a process.  As a result of this
     and further investigations, the Mines and Mining Committee proposed
     to the County Board a resolution to negotiate for such a project,
     which was approved 30-0.

          The MSDGC made a presentation to Fulton County officials on
     September 11, 1970, and on September 15, the Mining Committee, at
     the Sanitary District's invitation, toured the District's facilities
     in Chicago.  The Mines and Mining Committee undertook a series of
     discussions with various mining companies and the MSDGC attempting
                                II-9

-------
to organize a reclamation project in the County.   These meetings
lasted until the beginning of November 1970 without obtaining a
commitment from any mining company.   The objective of the discus-
sions was a lease arrangement between Fulton County and the mining
companies and then a lease-back arrangement between Fulton County
and the Sanitary District which would place direct control  of the
land with Fulton County.   However,  before any such contract could
be developed, a private landowner negotiated and  sold his large
holdings directly to the  District.

     The Fulton County Board was presented with an approach to
strip mine reclamation capitalizing  on the ability of the Chicago
region to pay for solutions to its  problems of growth.   Presum-
ably, there was no State  or Federal  aid for large scale reclama-
tion available to the County.   Fulton County had  in excess  of
45,000 acres of strip-mined ground  and was adding to this at a
rate of 1,200 to 2,000 acres per year.   The reclamation proposed
by the MSDGC would be accomplished  at no cost to  the County.  Ac-
cording to MSDGC (1975a), it was between six and  ten times  cheaper
to dispose of sewage sludge on strip-mined land than within the
boundaries of a metropolitan area.   Presumably, a project utiliz-
ing waste products from an urban area would be tightly  controlled
by both State and Federal agencies  having the necessary expertise
and authority to ensure the environmental  safety  of Fulton  County.
In addition, direct involvement of  County government in the pro-
ject from its conception  would offer strong local controls.  Based
on this reasoning, the County Board  chose to support the Sanitary
District proposal.
b.   Reclamation and Re-Use - By its strictest definition,  land
reclamation would require that all  conditions existing  prior to
mining operations be restored.  These would include topography,
surface and subsurface soils and drainage, water  quality, vege-
tation, wildlife, land use and population.  However, as it  is
quite evident that this would be nearly impossible to achieve,
reclamation cannot be defined in this way.
                           11-10

-------
     A practical approach would be to establish three parameters
by which to measure reclamation:  surface topography, surface soils
and land use.  Perhaps the most important aspect of reclamation is
restoring the use of the land.  Although near-original contours
may be achieved and soil building on stripped ground is successful,
a failure to re-establish an economic use of the land would pre-
vent full reclamation.  Too often a "reclaimed" acreage, originally
in some productive use, goes virtually unused.

     Every attempt should be made to insure that reclaimed strip
mine lands are capable of supporting the uses most in demand and
that will serve the most beneficial  purpose.

c.   Environmental Litigation - As of December 12, 1975, a number
of legal actions have been filed both by the Metropolitan Sanitary
District of Greater Chicago and against the Sanitary District.  In
Ripper y. MSP and County of Fulton,  various local  residents have
sought injunctive relief against the District's Fulton County opera-
tions and damages for alleged odor nuisance.  As of the end of the
year, the action was at the discovery stage, the District's motion
to dismiss having been denied.

     I EPA v. MSP (Mr. Parkhurst) is  an enforcement case of the
Illinois EPA before the Pollution Control  Board, charging air pollu-
tion violations against the District's Fulton County Program during
1974.  The case was held in discovery, with the assertion of attorney-
client privilege concerning withheld documents delaying the conclu-
sion.  The agency has recently turned over the withheld documents,
and the hearing officer has set a pre-hearing for  early January 1976.

     The Sanitary District filed the case MSP v. I EPA as a permit
appeal on March 27, 1975.   However,  at the District's request, any
hearing or determination on the part of the Pollution Control  Board
has been stayed, pending disposition of the above  case, IEPA v. MSP.
                            11-11

-------
          In another case of MSP v.  IEPA,  a  mandamus  action  was  brought
     by the District to compel  the issuance  of its  1975 Fulton County
     comprehensive operating permit.   A hearing was set for  October 28,
     1975, on the question of whether  the  agency can  withhold documents
     from discovery on the assertion  of attorney-client privilege.   The
     case is now set for a status report on  March 11, 1976.

          In yet another case of MSP v. IEPA, there is an appeal by the
     District from certain conditions  imposed in its  Gale and United
     Electric permits issued by the IEPA.   Hearings of October 29,  30,
     and 31 were set in Lewistown, Illinois.  The Fulton County  citizen's
     group intervened in the action.   A 90-day limit  for disposition of
     the case afforded the Pollution Control Board  until November 27, 1975,
     to render a decision on the appeal, but the District has further ex-
     tended the time for decision to  January 30, 1976.

3.   Interacting Programs

     The use of sludge for the reclamation of agricultural  land  is  only
one of many purposes of sludge disposal.  This section will  discuss
two allied programs dealing with sludge disposal.  The Nu-Earth  Program
is one in which the Sanitary District distributes cost-free  the  air-
dried solids from Imhoff sludge digestion.  The Big Bluestem Program,
whose objective is to recreate a native prairie on  sludge-reclaimed
land, is embryonic in its development.  This section  will conclude  with
an identification of the Fulton County Steering Committee's  role in the
implementation of the MSDGC's Prairie Plan.

     a.   Nu-Earth Program - The Nu-Earth Program can be traced  back to
     February 1974 when the Chicago Tribune featured the benefits of or-
     ganic fertilizer, presenting a detailed map of the Lawndale Avenue
     air-dried Imhoff solids pick-up site.  By September 1974, requests
     for Nu-Earth had outstripped the District's capacity to load and
     deliver.
                                  11-12

-------
     The process yielding Nu-Earth begins when wastewater, after
primary treatment, is pumped to an Imhoff tank where sedimentation,
thickening and stabilization of the sludge occurs.  The sludge is
then placed in open-air drying beds at the treatment plant.  The
partially dried sludge, now containing solids of approximately
25%, is transported to the Harlem Storage Site where it is dewatered
and partially composted.  Now called "Nu-Earth" having a solids
content of 60%, the sludge is transported via railroad,car or truck
to various pick-up sites.  There Nu-Earth is available free of charge
to gardeners, highway departments, farmers, and others.

     Nu-Earth distributed in 1974 amounted to 97,366 cubic yards.
During the first 11 months of 1975, approximately 198,000 cubic
yards have been distributed, far exceeding the goal of 130,000 cu-
bic yards for the entire year.  The distribution program has been
effective in producing a net reduction in volume of Nu-Earth in
storage at the Harlem Avenue Storage Site.  This is extremely bene-
ficial, as it provides a useful outlet for the vast amounts of
sludge that accumulate from wastewater treatment at .the individual
plants.  Permission has been obtained from the IEPA to deliver Nu-
Earth outside the MSDGC jurisdiction without requiring permits.  Be-
cause the program is new, emphasis is mainly on increasing public
utilization, and potential adverse environmental effects have not
been examined extensively.  Monitoring of environmental effects
from widespread distribution is far from feasible.

     Possible adverse effects include seepage of the soluble con-
stituents into groundwater, and surface runoff into streams.  Both
of these mechanisms present a risk of ground and surface water con-
tamination by organic and toxic components of the sludge.  In addi-
tion, application to crops for animal and human consumption pro-
vides a possible pathway for biomagnification of toxic elements
such as heavy metals in the food chain.
                             11-13

-------
b.   Big Bluestem Program - The idea for the Big Bluestem Prairie
was proposed to the MSDGC in July 1973 as a solution to the prob-
lems and environmental  restrictions encountered in reclaiming strip-
mined land in Fulton County by recycling sewage sludge.  The prin-
ciple is that a tall grass prairie may prove even better than crops
and pasture in recycling and reclamation.  The prairie project
would restore to the state something of its original heritage, and
prairie plants offer new possibilities for both agriculture and
land reclamation.

     The objective of the Big Bluestem Prairie project is to re-
create a native Illinois prairie, complete with its wildlife, on
strip-mined land by recycling the byproducts of sewage treatment.
Once established, the wildlife populations would be allowed to
strike their own dynamic balance with each other, and their prai-
rie environment, as would the plant life.  The area of the Big
Bluestem Prairie is envisioned as essentially the 3,000-acre Gale
Farm on the Cuba-Canton road  (Figure IV-13, page IV-60) virtually
all of which has been strip mined.  Approximately 1,700 acres have
less than  a 5% grade, and sewage sludge will be recycled on about
1,000 of these acres.

     Wildlife is the key to the tourist potential of Big Bluestem
and is vital to the prairie ecology itself.  Big Bluestem would be
a prime genetic reservoir of native wildlife for re-stocking other
areas of the country.  Buffalo and elk would dominate from a tourist
and ecological standpoint, but all of the animals native to the
Illinois prairie except  the  bear, wolf,  and cougar  or  mountain  lion,
would be included.   Non-native animal species which would enhance
tourist appeal may be kept on display.  Introduction of animals
could begin at the onset of the project.  There are governmental
and private non-profit agencies interested in establishing various
species, and the large  herbivores  could be introduced  by  the  MSDGC.
To date, 9 buffalo and 2 elk have been acquired for the project.
                              11-14

-------
     A minimum herd size of 300 buffalo, 150 elk, and 125 deer
is projected.  Populations of other animals would be allowed to
fluctuate naturally.  Interpretive nature programs,  both guided
and self-guided, will  be needed, along with viewing  accommodations
such as trails, blinds,  and riding tours.

c.   Prairie Plan (Fulton County Steering Committee) - The Fulton
County land reclamation  program is locally known as  the Prairie
Plan.   The Fulton County Steering Committee was established in
1971 to provide public participation in the Prairie  Plan.  The
committee is comprised of public officials, private  citizens,
and MSDGC staff personnel.  The members of the Steering Committee
are:

     •    The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater
          Chicago (Sponsor and Chairman)
     •    Fulton County  Board (Co-Sponsor)
     t    State of Illinois Department of Business
          and Economic Development
     •    State of Illinois Department of Conservation
     •    State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
     •    Western Illinois Regional  Council
     •    University of  Illinois
     •    Fulton County  Health Department
     •    Fulton County  Planning Commission
     •    City of Canton
     •    City of Cuba
     •    City of Lewistown
     •    Soil Conservation Service
                        11-15

-------
B.    PLANNING AREA AND STANDARDS

     This section will describe the geographic areas  that were chosen for
consideration of effects of the Fulton County project,  and the rationale be-
hind that choice.  As different geographic areas  will  be influenced socio-
economically and environmentally,  these are discussed separately.   The sec-
tion continues with a description  of the pollution control standards that
must be complied with by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chi-
cago in the operation of the Fulton County project.

     1.   Basis for the Planning Area

          The study of socio-economic and land use impacts employs three
     areas of focus.  The largest  area of study is regional, covering Ful-
     ton County and any influences of Peoria.  A more refined area contains
     land surrounding the project  area and includes Canton.  The smallest
     area of study is confined within the boundaries  of the project site
     (see Figure II-l )•

          The selection of the geographic focus of the study of each socio-
     economic or land use variable depends on two factors.  One is the size
     of the geographic units for which the associated data are reported.  For
     example, some census data dealing with population are available at a
     township level of disagregation, while data in the Census of Agriculture
     are available in greatest detail at a county scale.  The other deter-
     mining factor is the type of information to be studied.  For example,
     soils data are inherently more site-specific than are data concerning,
     say, trends in manufacturing  employment.

          The study of environmental effects of the project includes odor
     and noise nuisance, potential contamination of surface and ground water
     and soil, possible health effects of airborne pathogens, and potential
     biomagnification of toxic materials in food chains via crop and live-
     stock production and consumption.  Study topics are diversified so that
                                    11-16

-------
               LONDON MILLSX
                      TTfiLOUTVILLE
                             *
                              BLYTON
                                                   SUGAR KNOLLS
                                                       PC
WILDWOOD
HA\ENS
PC
                                                          HOLDING BASINS
                                                      MSD    N
                                               'RECLAMATION PROJECT

                                                      BRYANJJ ^
                                              TWSP'"'
                                               PARK  J
                                                PC
                                                                LITTLE
                                                               AMERICA
                                                                       THE ILLINOIS
                                                                       STATE  MUSEUM
                                                                       DICKSON MOUNDS
                                                   SEPO
                                                   WATERFORD
^IIVERPOOL BARGE DOCK
                              DUNCANS MILLS
       HISTORIC SITES


      VERMONT
                                                ANDERSON LAKE
            SPOON RIVER VALLEY
            SCENIC DRIVE

     	MSD PIPELINE

        I]  COUNTY HIGHWAY MARKER

       £24}  US HIGHWAY MARKER

       (?)  STATE HIGHWAY MARKER

            SPECIAL POINT OF INTEREST


            HIKING TRAIL

            BIKE ROUTE

       P  -  PICNICKING  C - CAMPING
                      Project Site  and  surrounding  area,
                                             11-17

-------
no definite geographic boundary can be assigned to accommodate all
effects.  For example, problems associated with odors and airborne
pathogens, which can travel  great distances depending upon meteoro-
logical conditions, require  a larger study area.   Related climatolo-
gical features must be examined not only locally  but also regionally.
Therefore, flexibility of boundaries for study of environmental  effects
is required according to individual  study topics.

     Generally speaking, the study area is extended to at least 5
miles from the boundaries of the project property.   This  area includes
communities of Canton, Cuba, St. David, Bryant, and Lewistown (see Fig-
ure II-l, page 11-17).  All  environmental and health effects resulting
from the project are evaluated against the applicable standards  as dis-
cussed in Section II.B.2. and confirmed with findings from similar stu-
dies in the literature.

2.   Pollution Control Standards

     The MSDGC must comply with three sets of regulations in order to
construct and operate the Fulton County land reclamation  project.  There
are effluent standards,  as stated in the Illinois EPA Water Pollution
Control Permit, which reflect the water pollution regulations of Illinois
Rule 404, governing the concentrations of total dissolved solids, BOD,
and fecal coliforms.  The Sanitary District must  construct, operate
and maintain the project so  as to maintain the General Water Quality
Standards for the State of Illinois.  In addition,  the Fulton County
Board of Health requires a permit for any sewage  sludge operation; it
contains standards for the chemical  composition,  transportation, stor-
age, use and disposal of digested and undigested  sewage sludge.   These
separate sets of standards are examined in turn in this section.

     a.   Water QuaVity Standards - The water quality standards for
     the State of Illinois are designed to protect Illinois waters for
     aquatic life, agricultural and industrial uses, and primary and
     secondary contact  (for  recreation), and to ensure the aesthetic
                               11-18

-------
quality of the aquatic environment.  Except during periods when
flows are less than the average minimum 7-day low flow, which

occurs once in 10 years, all waters of the State must meet the
standards defined in Table II-2.  In addition, the following

standards must be met:
     •    Any substance toxic to aquatic life shall not ex-
          ceed 1/10 of the 48-hour median tolerance limit
          (48-hour Tl_m) for native fish or essential fish
          food organisms

     t    All State waters must be free from unnatural sludge
          or bottom deposits, floating debris, visible oil,
          odor, unnatural plant or algal growth, unnatural
          color or turbidity, or matter in concentrations or
          combinations toxic or harmful to human, animal,
          plant, or aquatic life of other than natural ori-
          gin

     •    There shall be no artificially induced temperature
          changes that may adversely affect aquatic life, that
          may disturb the normal daily and seasonal tempera-
          ture fluctuations, or that may cause the temperature
          to rise more than 5°F above natural temperature.
b.   Eff]_uentJStandards^ - To construct and/or operate any water

pollution control facility in the State of Illinois, a permit

from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency is required.

Each permit is comprised of standard conditions common to all

such permits and a number of special conditions peculiar to a

specific case.  The Comprehensive Operating Permit issued to the

MSDGC contains 15 Special Conditions.  (The permit is presented

in its entirety in Appendix  A).


     According to Special Condition #9, the effluent discharged

from any runoff retention basin must meet the applicable effluent

requirements for discharge to the waters of the State as estab-

lished by the Illinois Pollution Control Board Rules and Regula-

tions.  The point of discharge is considered to be the overflow

structure of each of the retention basins.
                          11-19

-------
Table II-2.   Water Quality Standards for the State of Illinois
Parameter
Ammonia nitrogen (as N)
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Cadmium
Chloride
Chromium (total hexavalent)
Chromium (total trivalent)
Copper
Cyanide
Dissolved Oxygen
Minimum for 16 out of 24 hours
Minimum at any time
Fluoride
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Phenols
Phosphorous (as P)*
Selenium
Silver
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids
Zinc
Standard (mg/1)
1.5
1.0
5.0
1.0
0.05
500.
0.05
1.0
0.02
0.025

6.0
5.0
1.4
1.0
0.1
1.0
0.0005
1.0
0.1
0.05
1.0
0.005
500.
1000.
1.0
Acidity-alkalinity
Fecal coliforms**
     Geometric mean
     Maximum for 10% of samples
                                                  per 100 ml
200
400
                                                         I***
Radioactivity
     Beta
     Radium 226
     Strontium 90
100
  1
  2
   *In any  reservoir or lake, or in any stream at the point of
     entry to any  reservoir or lake
  **Based on a minimum of five samples taken over not more than
     a 30-day period
  ***Pico curies per liter
                            11-20

-------
     Special Condition #10 states that certain contaminant con-
centrations are to be considered background values, and that the

effluent standards are met when the sum of the background concen-
tration and the allowable regulatory concentration is greater
than the measured concentration for the respective parameter.  The
numerical values of these standards are presented in Table II-3
below.
     Table II-3.
Effluent Standards for Retention Basin
Discharge in the State of Illinois
Total
Suspended Solids
(mg/1)
BOD
(mg/1)
Fecal
Col i form
(mg/1)
Background
Arithmetic Mean

Background
Geometric Mean

Water Pollution
Regulations of
Illinois Rule 404
(Regulatory con-
centration)

Effluent Standard
(Total concentration)
           61.7
            5.0
           66.7
2.75
4.0


6.75
                                          94.3
c.   Sludge Standards - The Fulton County Board of Health Sewage

Sludge Rules and Regulations require that any transportation, stor-

age, use, or disposal of sewage sludge or digested sewage sludge re-

quires a valid permit from the Board of Health.  All sewage sludge
                        11-21

-------
transported for storage or applied to land must be digested, and

all digested sludge placed in a storage basin must meet the follow-

ing standards:
          Volatile acids - no more than five 24-hour composite
          samples taken in a 30-day period shall  exceed 300 mg/1

          Alkalinity - no more than 5% of the 24-hour composite
          samples taken in a 30-day period shall  be lower than
          2,500 mg/1

          Volatile solids - no 24-hour composite  sample shall
          be more than 62% of total  solids

          pH - no 24-hour composite sample shall  be less than
          6.9 units.
These tests must be performed by the permit holder on a 24-hour
composite sample of digested sewage sludge to be transported for
storage in Fulton County.   Weekly results are to be submitted to
tire Fulton County Board of Health, which retains the right to in-
dependently sample the sewage sludge of any permit holder in Ful-
ton County.


     The use and disposal  of digested sewage sludge must also
comply with the following  standards:
     t    Cropping practices shall  be such that soil  loss does
          not exceed tolerable limits as defined by the Universal
          Soil Loss Equation for that soil type

     t    Digested sewage sludge shall  be incorporated into bare
          soils and absorbed into all soils

     •    Underground aquifers shall  not be contaminated with di-
          gested sewage sludge or its constituents

     •    Spray applications shall  be done so as to contain the
          material within the land-application area designated
          in the permit.
                        11-22

-------
In addition,  digested sewage  sludge  shall  not  be  applied:

     •    Within  100  feet  of  a  stream,  lake, well, or any
          potable water supply
     t    Within  200  feet  of  a  dwelling  unit
     •    On  root crops for human  consumption
     •    In  a  flood  plain, unless adequate pollution control
          mechanisms  are available
     0    To  frozen or snow-covered  land
     •    Outside of  the land-application  area.
                          11-23

-------
C.    PRESENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

     As the Fulton County reclamation project utilizes sludge generated by
the operations of the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago,
any discussion of the project would be incomplete without first describing
the associated wastewater treatment systems.  This section discusses in de-
tail the existing MSDGC systems for wastewater treatment and sludge process-
ing and disposal, with emphasis upon the particular plants contributing sludge
for land disposal in Fulton County.  The section concludes with a forecast of
future sludge production.

     1.   MSDGC Sewage Treatment Plants

          The MSDGC has six wastewater treatment plants, the locations of
     which are shown in Figure II-2.  The West-Southwest, Calumet and North-
     side plants are secondary treatment works, while Hanover, Streamwood,
     and Lemont provide tertiary treatment.  The John E. Egan Water Reclama-
     tion Plant is presently under construction, and the Streamwood Plant is
     scheduled to be retired upon completion of the Poplar Creek Intercep-
     tion System.

          The capacities and average 1973 flow ranges of each plant are pre-
     sented in Table II-4.  The present water-borne waste distributions from
     major industries discharging 10,000 gallons per day or more are 135 MGD
     to the West-Southwest Plant, 22 MGD to Northside, and 38 MGD to Calumet.
     The performance of these plants in terms of 5-day biological oxygen de-
     mand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS) and ammonia (NH--N) is reported
     in both effluent concentration and percent reduction in Table II-4.

          At the present time, only the West-Southwest and Northside facili-
     ties produce sludge to be shipped to Fulton County for land reclamation
     (MSDGC, 1975 a,b,c).  These two, therefore, receive detailed attention
     concerning their treatment processes and sludge handling and disposal
     facilities.  The Northside facility has no sludge stabilization re-
     cycling or disposal systems.  After concentration, sludge at approxi-
     mately 1.5% solids  is pumped to the West-Southwest facility via pipeline.
                                   11-24

-------
IT_CO:) LAKE  CO.  _,.

      COOK  CO.
\           "GEND

    A UNDER CONSTRUCTION
                                                                   MICHIGAN
                                                  WIST-
                                               SOUTHWEST
                                                  PLANT
                 Lockport
              METROPOLITAN SANITARY DISTRICT

                   OF GREATER  CHICAGO
                                                         CO.
                                                    WIIL CO.          BOU
          Figure II- 2.   Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago

                         Sewage  and Wastewater Treatment Plant Locations
                         (MSDGC, 197.5a)

                                     11-25
                                                                      BOUNDARY

-------
  n:
co
        co
      co
      O
      o
    cr;
                    -o
                    fD
                    -s
                    o
                    fD
                    fD
                    Q.
                    O
  fD
-  -s
  Cu
1 CQ
-  fD
                          fD
                    o  3
                          o
                          o
                          3
                    CO

                    CO
        CO
        CO
        cn
      co
      cn
  en
  CO
        oo
        oo
        ro
        co
        cn
              O
      CO
      o
      CO
      o
  o

  ro
cn    co


co    co
•^j    cn





co    ro
        co    co
        —i    co
  —'    co    ro
  ro    co    -p>
        ^i    oo
        oo    o
— • -n o
CO — ' Bi
^^J C? ™C3
Co S Cu
O
T" | — Ja x — ^o — J«
-•• O < 2 Q» rt-
CQ 2 fD CD 3 <<
3- fD -s OCQ
fD to cu 	 fD ^— •
to rh CQ to 3
r+ fD O
0 -•• 0
O O> O 3 — '
CU _i. O)


__* __j
-P=- cn GO ro
— • ro oo o
Cn — ' Cn O
• • •
000


-P> ro co co
o cn -p» co
cn co co co
• • •
cn — • oo




co — > ro ro
— ' -P> 0 — i
cn oo co co
• • •
oo 0 en



•£* ro cn cr>
• • • •
co cn cn o




ro o o — >
• • • •
ro co co ro




cn — i ro co
• • • .
•-J CO Ji> O



—1 0
-S fD
fD CQ
0" -S
c-t- fD
3 fD
fD
3 O
n- -h







co
fD
O
0
3
O.
O>
^

CO
fD
O
0
3
Q.
CU
-s

CO
fD
O
O
3
Q.
Of
-s
—1
fD
•^
(-f-
—i.
Cu
-5
^
—1
fD
-5
_i.
0)
-s

—1
fD
3-
CU
-s
^<















fD
to
c-l-

CO
0
c
3-
fD
to

O
-s
c+
3"
co
_l.
Q-
fD

O
Cu
__j
e~
3
fD
"
rc
O>
3
O

fD
-s

1 —
fD
O
3
^
CO
-s
fD
01
o
0
Q.
                                                                                                        Cu
                                                                                                        a-
                                                                                                        fD
                                                                                                        -o
                                                                                                        ro
                                                                                                        -s
                                                                                                        -h
                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                        -s

                                                                                                        CU
                                                                                                        3
                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                        ro
                                                                                                        oo
                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                        cn
                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                        Cu
                                                                                                        3
                                                                                                        C3
                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                        CO
                                                                                                        cn
                                                                                                        Cu
                                           11-26

-------
In 1973, the Northside plant pumped 2.2 MGD (132 dt/d) of primary and
secondary sludge to the West-Southwest plant (MSDGC ,  1975c).

2.   West-Southwest Treatment Plant

     The WSW plant is comprised of the West Side Treatment Works,
which is an Imhoff facility, and the Southwest Side Treatment Works,
an activated sludge facility.  Figure II-3 shows the layout of the
existing facilities.  Figure II-4 is a simplified flow diagram depict-
ing the processes of both the West Side and Southwest Side Works.  The
facilities of both treatment works can be divided conveniently into two
groups:  sewage treatment systems; sludge processing systems.  The sew-
age treatment systems are briefly discussed below, followed by a detailed
description of the sludge processing systems.

     The West Side Treatment Works consist of  a grit chamber and screen
house, skimming tanks, Imhoff tanks for sewage treatment and sludge sta-
bilization, and drying beds for sludge dewatering.  There are 108 Imhoff
tanks arranged in three batteries of 36 tanks  each.  Digested Imhoff
sludge is dried on 12 underdrained sand beds 80 feet wide and 800 to
1,400 feet long, with a total area of 25.1 acres.  Air-dried sludge is
scraped from the beds and hauled to a dump 3 miles west of the plant.
Dried Imhoff sludge is given away as "Nu-Earth".   As an option, Imhoff
sludge may be screened prior to either lagooning or heated anaerobic
digestion.

     The Southwest Treatment Works include aerated grit chambers, grit
dewatering building, preliminary settling tanks, aeration tanks for the
activated sludge process, and final settling tanks for sewage treatment.
Heat drying, heated anaerobic digestion, and  wet air oxidation (or the
Zimpro process) are the three sludge processes used at the Southwest
Treatment Works.  These are discussed, separately, below.
                               11-27

-------
-5
n>
 i
oo
fD
in
c+
 i
in
o
03
co
ft>

01
'.a
n>
m
PJ
CD
O
-s
CD
3
 OJ

<<
 O
 00
 a
 en
 QJ
                                QQQJ
                                 "


»
, t '.
i 3
7T~i

* i
h - 	 2_j
iT 	 _l_i



: 5
i — ^— — e —

-- — — — —
•r* 	 _J


                               'Vi^L*	'      • _     _    -llMi •• \       §
                               ^p ... .--. -„-„-, -r^p^.^
,  "\ ,,i                         yi    *»
 * ''"Sli* "*™~^" CENTRAL »v£NUC »i(» fltCMT Of WAY 	", . - ' \^/.\ ° . n *7

 •, "o^X ,'        '      i  —•j1 ( 'h'-f >3
 \ mt	..«   !;^'!i.§ is
  \%,                  Hi ft:**
   -.  'VyL		ii^-siM
                                                                         IS
                      •S	III;1 :
     «,^L..^S2~i^P- -—- ^ -ML-S-^
                                            '• ^X^"*"1 0"""-7-—'C^'	I—I	i
                                            ,  \\\ T^^^.^   r------ .*-ri3c \^'- -- ^^ I
                                              H \»'*^\  i  ." "-LF-=--""-"-i • |  i  .    i  i

                                             -          '
                                               *'\\i*li—'^i-i,^1.'!  r  "Sl:
                                    TT^     V-""

-------
REEN. CHAMBE

an leaned
T S

Sir
fO '*l'.i OX,



Ul
g
as
10
s
K







T3 TJ
Jl

-I OJ O)
H ia to
C
n » •
j frfr
Z 3 3
-t ft O,
s .-.•

1 *iv'
u u
38
1 |
r-j m















K

3
.
M
DC
0 -
1IMD








cc


%S

*
I
Aotjj«pun











at,
to
U
u



«^

I



aa?emas\










SCREE!
Rakes
li
5*




















r







o.
•
&
in _<
5 x
J>
IMMXNG
05* X 6
x -*
in
s
I
i
CO
i °
5 o
D. *
C
i o
i *
M m
8 M
3 '
W tfi





c
0

Deten
Minute

£














V
5?
.0
to
S
k.
f OVER





-"t
H
|4
3
C
5?
Is
:•
e'
s.J

s
i
^


                                    aa
                                    Tl O
                                 c y'S
                                 3 s'
r*
X
O
5
3
3
g
s
0
•1.






M
i
*
M

•
U
e
«£
H U

2 £.
U *^
3 * •
2^2
nee
W -H
ss°
B^J
SS3
rt
i
«

£ 3
               35

               *3.
               •/> kO

              T3 e* 
                                                S 1


                                                I
                            s-.
                            D n
                                                o  S w —*
 SO M •
 -* h i
Sxi'
3-  „!
H ~< H T
Ssgi
                                                            J
                                                          cI
                                                        u *>

                                                        5;^
XX
25

5 >
sa-.
                        253
                                                         a •
                                                         M a
                              11-29

-------
     The heat drying process includes screening of sludge by bar
screens and grinding the screenings by hammer mills,  sludge dewatering
by 98 vacuum filters, and sludge drying by multi-hearth flash dryers.
The dried sludge produced is sold as fertilizer base  material.

     In the heated anaerobic digestion process, some  sludge,after
screening and grinding,  is  concentrated in either flotation-sedimen-
tation tanks or simple sedimentation tanks.   Concentrated sludge is
pumped to anaerobic digesters;  a total  of 12 digesters  are in opera-
tion.  The sludge is then circulated through heaters  and returned to
the anaerobic digester,  where mixing is accomplished  by digester gas
recirculation.  Digested sludge is then pumped to holding tanks and
lagoons.

     The wet air oxidation  process oxidizes  sludge organic matter under
high pressure and elevated  temperature.  The method is  based on the
principle of wet combustion for degrading sludge  organic matter.   Sludge
is ground and then pumped to four 40,000-gallon storage tanks,  each of
which supplies a reactor.  The  total capacity of  the  four units is ap-
proximately 300 tons.  The  sludge, which usually  contains between 2 1/2
to 4 1/2% solids, is pumped from the storage tanks, pressurized,  and
mixed with air at 1,800  psi before entering  the wet air reactor-.   The
sludge-air mixture usually  attains a temperature  of 400°F or higher.
Oxidation in the reactors results in a temperature rise of 100°F.   The
effluent is then pumped  to  lagoons west of the plant.   This process has
been on standby since July  1972 (MSDGC, 1975a).

3.   Sludge Processing and  Disposal

     In 1973, the MSDGC  produced approximately 1,250  dry tons per day
(dt/d) of sewage sludge.  The MSDGC has a number  of systems available
for sludge handling, stabilization and disposal,  and  is developing
others.  (These are presented in Figure II-5.)  Detailed discussions
on the systems related to this  study are given in sections V.A through
V.F.  The sludge processing systems at the WSW plant are summarized in
Table II-5, which gives  the types of systems utilized in 1973 and their
capacities in dry tons per day.

                                11-30

-------
          SYSTEMS




PRIMARY



SECONDARY




TERTIARY



IMHOFF



HEAT DRY



VACUUM FILTRATION



AIR DRY




SETTLING AND FLOTATION-CONC



DIGESTION




UET AIR OXIDATION



LAGOONING




STOCKPILING



NU-EARTH




SELL HEAT-DRIED



LAGOON CLEANING CONTRACTS




CALUMET AND HANOVER FARMS



FULTON COUNTY:



   SOIL INCORPORATION




   SOIL INJECTION



   CROP SPRAY




   FOREST SPRAY



   OVERLAND FLOW
GENERATING  STABILIZATION CONCENTRATION
                                                                       DISPOSAL
               Figure II-5.   Available MSDGC Solids Systems  (MSDGC)
                                        11-31

-------
Table II-5.    West-Southwest Sludge Processing Systems,  1973 (MSDGC, 1975a)
                                                            Capacity (dt/d)
System
Type
Imhoff Digestion, Air
Drying on Sand Beds, and
Storage
                           Stabilization
                           and Recycling
                       100
Heat Drying
                           Stabilization
                           and Recycling
                                                                 380
Heated An-
aerobic Digestion
                           Stabilization
                       300
Wet Air Oxidation
Process (on standby
basis only)
                           Stabilization
                       190
Land Reclamation
(as of December 1974)
                           Recycling
                        90
Lagoons (requiring periodic
cleaning; no long-term dis-
posal capacity available)
                           Disposal
                                     11-32

-------
     Typical in-plant sludge flow and sludge operations at the West-
Southwest plant in 1973 are presented in Figure II-6.  Approximately
713 dt/d of sludge solids entered the plant, 33 dt/d of which were
discharged with the plant effluent into a sanitary receiving canal.
The remaining 680 dt/d entered one of four sludge handling, stabili-
zation, and disposal schemes:

     •    Heat drying and fertilizer sale
     •    Heated anaerobic digestion and lagooning
     t    Heated anaerobic digestion and land application
          in Fulton County
     •    Imhoff digestion followed by air drying on sand
          beds and subsequent distribution as "Nu-Earth".

Approximately 172 dt/d of the 680 dt/d solids were eventually re-
cycled back to the head end of the plant in several forms:  super-
natants derived from concentration units, heat dryers,  Lawndale  lagoons,
and sludge holding basins at the land application site in Fulton
County; underdrainage from Imhoff air-drying beds; and filtrate  from
vacuum filters.

     The heat drying units generated approximately 200 dt/d of solids,
digestion and lagooning accounted for 38 dt/d, and digestion and land
application in Fulton County totaled about 209 dt/d.  The sludge from
the Imhoff tanks was split into three portions, each receiving different
treatment.  Approximately 11.7 dt/d of raw Imhoff sludge joined  the
digester sludge for lagooning.  About 20.4 dt/d were shipped to  Fulton
County for land application.  Approximately 94.5 dt/d were air-dried
on sand beds and transported, along with approximately 100 dt/d  of scum
and grit generated by the plant, to the Harlem Avenue Dump where the air-
dried solids were given away as "Nu-Earth".  During sludge processing,
approximately 85.5 dt/d of material were released as particulates and
gases to the atmosphere from the stacks of the heat dryers, and  approxi-
mately 63.4 dt/d were released to the atmosphere by the heated anaerobic
digesters due to volatilization and gasification of sludge.
                                11-33

-------
-5
fD
-a

o>
3
c+

oo



a.

fD


~n



i

fu


CL

CO
—i
c
CL.

fD

O

fD
-S
cu
o
3
O)
fD
 I
oo
o
fD
I/)
-a

cu
IXD
2
oo
a
en
o
tn
cr
                                                          Supernatant  Return Approximately 2,285 dt
                                                  11-34

-------
            The average sludge  production rates  for different sludge  process-
       ing systems  in  the WSW plant  are summarized  in  Table  11-7.   Future
       sewage flows and sludge  generation rates  are important in  comparing  fu-
       ture treatment  and disposal alternatives.  Based  on area population
       forecasts,  the  MSDGC  has derived the  future  average dry weather flow
       and raw sludge  production,  presented  in Table II-6 below.
 Table II-6.   Forecast of Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) and Raw Sludge
               Production
Year
1973*
1980
1990
2000
Norths ide
ADWF (MGD) Raw
324
279
292
304
Plant
Sludge (dt/d)
_ _
39
46
52
WSW
ADWF (MGD)
838
882
895
910
Plant
Raw Sludge (dt/d)
641
878
1121
1138

*Actual production as a base for comparison
                                    11-35

-------




•




CO
o
c
3

CU
3
Q.

CD
-s

rt-
po
ro
3
O

Cu
_^

+

1 —
CU
3
O.

a
_j.
oo
-a
o
oo
CU
__j




































_,
O
o

0
V














•




1 — 1
3
3-
o
-h
-h

a


^.
-s

o

e<
— J*
3
Id

+

i—
CU
3
Q.

O
_j.
oo
-a
o
oo
Cu
_^





























vo
p^
.
en
j
^^




•
UD

en

r—
CU
3
Q.

c;
^.
oo
-o
O
oo
CU
_j





















































































|—
Cu
3
O-

• • >
-a
-£3
— i
_i<
CO >— i O
_l 2 QJ
C 3" rt-
O- O -"•
IO -h O
ro -ti 3

o a
0 -••
3 CO
o ro
ro oo
3 rl-
-s o
CU 3
rt-
-•• +
O
3 r-
CU
+ 3
Q.
^a
3 3=-
Cu "O
ro -a
-s — '
o ->•
cr o
_i. cu
O ct-
—t*
0 O
_i. 3
to
ro
oo
rt-
_i.
O
3

+

1 —
Cu
3
a.

^t
•a
-a

_j.
n
cu
rl-

0
3












ro
o ro
CO CD
. ,
ro -e»

^^HH>^^M^^




ro
ro
CO

«"•> -^.
O
O >
3 3
-i. cu
3 ro
ca -j
o
cr
— J*
o

a
_J,
to
ro
oo
rl-
_i.
0
3

+

1 —
CU

oo ro
ro

o
o
3
O
ro
3
-s
Cu
rl-
—i*
0
3

+


rt-
-s
CU
rl-
.j.
O
3

+

^
ro
Cu
rl-

0
-^
*<
— J«
3
(O

+

-n
ro
-s
rt-
^
_j.
N
ro
-s
CO
CU
ro















ro
o
0
0



















































































^-^.
o_
-s
<<

rt-
O
3
00
"*-^,
O-
a>
"<





























CO
_^
c~
D-
LQ
ro

~u
-s
0
o
ro
oo
oo
_ j.
3
in

CO
e<
oo
(-(-
ro
3






























CO
— • >

Q. fD
10 -S
ro cu
to
"o ro
-s
O J=
a. 3
C 3
n c
rt- O^
o
3




















—1
O>
*EL
ro

i — i
) — i
i
^j
•



-O 5=
-s <
o ro
0 -S
ro cu
OO IQ
oo ro
_j.
3 CO
to —^
f~
CO O_
<< to
oo ro
ff-
ro -o
3 -S
oo o
O-
— *• ci
3 O
r-t-
rt -<•
3- 0
ro 3

£1 TO
CO CU
y f-^
ro
-o oo
—i
CU -h
3 0
rl- -S

O
VO -h
^J -h
co ro
~s
"5 3
en rt-
CT3 CO
n — '
O-
10 ro
cr
















11-36

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHY
     Fulton County (Illinois) Board,  The Fulton County Board and Metropoli-
     tan Sanitary District, (undated).

     Illinois Cooperative Extension Service,  Utilization  of Sewage  Sludge
     on Agricultural  Land (SM-29),  April 1975.

     MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study,  MSDGC  Overview Report, Planning
     Department,  Revised January 1975a.

     MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study,  Central  Facility Area, Planning
     Department,  Revised January.1975b.

     MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study,  Northside Facility Area,  Planning
     Department,  Revised January 1975c.
                                     11-37

-------
                    III.   DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

     This chapter presents an in-depth description of the project.   The
first section describes the project site and operations,  including  pro-
cesses of sludge shipment, storage, and application.   The second section
discusses the environmental control and monitoring systems that were in-
corporated into the project to protect the environmental  quality of the
site and its surroundings.  The control and monitoring systems discussed
include those pertaining to sludge, water, soil, biota, and air.

A.   PROJECT SITE AND OPERATIONS

     This section introduces the project site and surrounding area  in terms
of location, land use, and terrain.  The three basic elements of a  sludge
disposal system for land reclamation are sludge shipment, storage,  and land
application.  These project operations are reviewed, along with a profile
of sludge characteristics, in the second part of this section.  A third  part
describes the rates and techniques of sludge application.

     1.   Sludge Application Site

          The land reclamation project of the MSDGC is located centrally in
     Fulton County, Illinois.  The project site is immediately east of the
     village of Cuba or approximately 25 miles west-southwest of Peoria.
     Most of the site is sandwiched between the Cuba-Canton Road (Illinois
     Route 5) and Illinois Route 100 near Canton to the northeast and Lewis-
     town to the south.  Big Creek flows southwesterly through the  project
     site and merges with Spoon River, which is a tributary of the  Illinois
     River, a major navigable waterway.  (A regional map prepared from a
     1:250,000 USGS map, showing the project site and surroundings, is pre-
     sented in Figure  II-l, page 11-17).

          The surroundings of the project are rural.   Some growth of popu-
     lation is expected, but the area is not in the path of urban or subur-
     ban growth.  The major local economic influences are farming,  strip
                                     III-l

-------
mining, and manufacturing.   Canton and Lewistown are the principal
nearby central  places.   Peoria and Pekin have a major regional in-
fluence on the project  area; providing easily accessable centers  of
trade employment and recreation.   Land use  in the  area  surround-
ing the project site is predominantly unintensive.  The primary uses
are row crop, farming,  livestock  grazing and strip mining.   Farming
and mining are becoming highly mechanized,  employing progressively
fewer people.

     More than 60% of the project site was  strip-mined  for  coal
years ago, forming a rough  terrain of depressions  and lakes with-
out drainage outlets.  Soils have a high clay content and are re-
latively impervious.  However, some paths of rapid flow developed
by rearrangement and re-distribution of soils and  unconsolidated
bedrock during mining operations.  Access roads generally form the
dividing ridge lines between adjacent mini-sections.

     Since 1971, the project site has been  contoured and terraced to
create fields suitable  for sludge application and  retention basins have
been constructed to contain stormwater runoff.  Four large  holding
basins have been constructed for  the purpose of storing sludge prior
to field application.  A detailed description of the project features,
operations, and environmental control and monitoring systems is pre-
sented in the following section.

2.   Sludge Shipment and Storage

     Digested sludge from the West-Southwest plant or sludge from the
Lawndale^lagoons, or a  mixture of both, is  barged  approximately 200
miles down the Illinois River to  the dock at Liverpool  in Fulton
County (Figure III-l).   The barges have a capacity of 1,500 to 2,500
tons and must pass a series of river locks  during  the journey.  The
sludge is unloaded using 6,000 gpm-capacity pumps  and relayed by
booster pumps of 6,600 gpm capacity to the  four sludge holding basins
about 10.5 miles inland (Figure  III-2A & III-2B)
                              III-2

-------
                                                            CO
                                                            -o
                                                             c
                                                             fO
                                                             c
                                                             o
                                                             rtJ
                                                             Q
                                                             13
                                                             O
                                                             c.
                                                             o
                                                             13
                                                             U_

                                                             O
                                                             4->

                                                             a)
                                                             -M
                                                             n
                                                             o
                                                             a:

                                                             cr>
                                                             c:

                                                             en
                                                             S-
                                                             
III-3

-------
The supernatant in the upper layer of sludge in the holding basins  is
partially barged back to the head end of the West-Southwest treatment
plant.  Past sludge shipments between the West-Southwest plant or
Lawndale lagoons and the holding basins are shown in Figure III-3.
        LJ	_HOIDING BASIHS
         TOTAL ARIA Or HOLDING BASINS
               26O ACRES
       Figure  III-2.    Holding  Basins  for  Storage of Sewage
                       Sludge  (Dalton  and  Murphy, 1973)
     During the storage periods,  sludge particles settle to the bottom
of the holding basins, creating two layers of liquid.  The top layer
ranges from 14 to 18 feet in depth and is composed of supernatant con-
taining 1% solids.  The bottom layer consists of thickened and com-
pacted sludge with solids up to 12%.  During periods of storage, it  is
likely that at least one-fifth of the nitrogen in the sewage is lost
to the atmosphere in the form of  amonia.

     Typical vertical profiles of sludge characteristics in the hold-
ing basins are shown in Figure 111-4.  Profiles are presented for three
holding basins and seven parameters.  In general, pH values remain con-
                              III-4

-------
                              MT. PISGAH
                         PC i  PARK
                                                SUGAR KNOLLS
                                                    PC
  ILDWOOD
HAVENS
PC
                                                       HOLDING BASINS
                                                   MSD    N
                                            "RECLAMATION PROJECT
                                           PUTMAPJ,
                                            TWSP
                                             EABK
                                              PC
                                                             LITTLE
                                                            AMERICA
                                                                    THE ILLINOIS
                                                                    TATE MUSEUM
                                                                    DICKSON MOUNDS
                                          	  SEPO
                            DUNCANS M1LLSW?T\ WATERFORD
^LIVERPOOL BARGE DOCK
       HISTORIC SITES


     VERMONT
           SPOON RIVER VALLEY
           SCENIC DRIVE

     	MSD PIPELINE

       [5]  COUNTY HIGHWAY MARKER

           U.S HIGHWAY MARKER

       (?)  STATE HIGHWAY MARKER

       Q  SPECIAL POINT OF INTEREST


           HIKING TRAIL

           BIKE ROUTE

       P -  PICNICKING  C - CAMPING
   Figure III-2B.   Unloading  Dock, Pipeline  Routing, and  Holding  Basins.
                                            III-4B

-------
in
en
4
      *UBp

      •D9Q
      •AON

      •130

    'Idas
      •6n\/
en
      9unp
*;
      •AON

      '130
co
i—
      •6ny
      /C[nr
      aunp
     L
CM

cn
      •AON

      •130
     'Idas
      •6ny
      aunp
                                                                   •!-
                        co to -
                        CU IB
                        3 CO -

                        C cn
                        O) E
                        OI T-
                         c cn
                        c 03 •—
                        O)
                        E  -   «'
                        Q- to -Q
                        •r- C   "
                        -C O  CO
                        I/} O
                           cnc\j
                        tit ro r^
                        cn—i cn
                        •o   r—
                        13 CU

                        CO fO O
                           "O CD
                        +-> c a
                        co 3 co
                                                              oo
                                                               i
                                                               CU

                                                               3
                                                               CD
                CU
                _c
             E -M
             O
             S- O
             M- •!->

             T3 •!->
             CO C
                   O)
             S_ i— -i-
             r3 Q-  to
             JD
                             O)
                          OJ JZ
                          J= -1-5
                          4J
                             O
                          E 4->
                          O
                          S- I/)
                          M- C
                             O
                          -o o
                          ra    CO
                          x) cu
                                       U
                                       (0 O)
"O CO
CU
cn+-> 4->
s- o c
fO QJ fO
-Q 'i->i—

^ 2^
§ Q--s
"t^ CU 3
                   cu
                  T-5
                cuo
                          cn-o a>
                          T3  C: -r-3
                          =j;;o
                          r-rot.
                          00_JQ.
                                      III-5

-------
Q.
O)
T3
                        2  1  3A
                        \
                        \
       7.0   7.4    7.8    8.2
                                        "pH
                                               Q.
                                               QJ
                                                 6
                                                 7
                                                 8
1234567891011TSS
                                                       1    3A
Q.
   0
   1
   2
   3
   4
   ^
   5
   6
   7


^E_
-C
4->
Q.
O)
-o



0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
r v / \
; V
A \
• \ \
\\ \
\\ \
• v
/ \ \
/ • *
\
— i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — '
         1000  2000   3000  4000
                                   5000 Total N(ppm)  36   38  40  42  44  46  48  50 52 54 56
                                                                              Total  Vola-
                                                                              tile Solids
                                                                                (ppm)
          Figure  III-4.  Typical  Vertical  Profiles of Characteristics of
                         Sludge in Holding Basins 1,  2 and 3A, April  1975
                         (MSDGC,  1975d)
                                        III-6

-------
   0
   1
   2
   3
   4
   j-
   D
   6
   7
0
1
2
S3
-c 4
& 5
T>
6
7

















"*^^^
x. """-^
\ ""-^ 2
1 \
3A
      600  800   1000   1200  1400  1600 NH3-N(ppm)  2   4  6  810
                                                                12 14 16 Volatile
                                                                         Acids  (ppm)
Q.
Ol
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
      200
          600  1000   1400   1800  2200 Total P(ppm)
                          Figure III-4.   (Continued)
                                       III-7

-------
stant in the top 5 meters and then decrease with depth.  Because
large proportions of nitrogen and phosphorous compounds are asso-
ciated with suspended solids which settle in the basins, the total
suspended solids, total nitrogen, and total phosphorous concentrations
are highest at the bottom of the holding basins.  The same pattern  of
ammonia nitrogen concentration, which is constant in the top 5 meters
and then increases with depth, is recorded for all three basins.  Gen-
erally speaking, the total volatile solids and volatile acids are
slightly enriched at the bottom of the basins.

3.   Application Methods and Amounts

     Before application, conventional dredge equipment (Figure III-5)
is used to mix the concentrated bottom sludge with the upper layer  of
supernatant.  The mixture usually contains solids of 6% or less (Dalton
and Murphy, 1973).

     The sludge is pumped from the holding basins via a piped distri-
bution system and applied to the land by a number of techniques. Field
application devices available at the site include:  traveling sprayer,
center-pivot sprayer, moldboard plow incorporator, tandem disk incor-
porator, chisel plow incorporator, and gated irrigation pipe (MSDGC,
1975i).  Sludge spraying is accomplished by modular units consisting
of pumps, an above-ground header system, and a "big gun" spray vehicle
(Figure II1-6).  The pumps and header system can be adapted to other
types of irrigation vehicles.  To prevent clogging, the nozzle of the
spray gun has a 2-inch diameter or larger.  The pressure and spray  rate
are 90 psi and 600 gpm, respectively, and the horizontal throw is ap-
proximately 120 to 150 feet (MSDGC, 1975i).  The travel scheme of the
sprayer vehicle is shown in Figure III-7.

     Two types of tillage machines are used to incorporate sludge in-
to soil -- the moldboard plow incorporator and the tandem disk incor-
porator (Figure UI-6 shows the latter),   Sludge is incorporated into
soil  by the disk machine with a distribution manifold which directs
                                III-8

-------
       HOLDINO       FU(tr CAPHCIIY =
       '"«,  nixilll  ,,„„„ OAl. , „,„.
            BISCH»«OI f n IOU01
                   HOLDINO BASIN & DREDGE OPERATION
Figure III-5.    Holding Basin,  Dredge Operation,
                  and  Distribution System (Dalton
                  and  Murphy,  1973)
                         III-9

-------
Figure III-6.
Traveling Sprayer Applying Liquid Sludge to a  Corn  Crop  (top)
and Disk Incorporation with Trailing Supply Hose (MSDGC,  1975n)
                                   111-10

-------
                                                                  LT>
                                                                  o
                                                                  CD

                                                                  OO
                                                                  SI


                                                                   OJ

                                                                   O
                                                                  •I—

                                                                   HI
                                                                   s-
                                                                   O)
                                                                   fO
                                                                   Q.
                                                                  oo
                                                                   o

                                                                   O)

                                                                   O)

                                                                   o


                                                                  "oj

                                                                   i-
                                                                   cu
III-ll

-------
sludge to each disk blade as it tills the soil.  Sludge is thereby
applied to the entire cross-sectional area of the soil being tilled.
The soil injector (Figure III-8) works on the same principle as the
soil incorporator, except that an injector applies sludge to slots
formed in the soil by a tool shank.

     A total of 43 application fields were developed from 1971  to 1973
in eight stages, varying in size from 15 to 150 acres (Figure 111-9).
Each field is provided with runoff berms and one or more runoff reten-
tion basins to divert and contain storm runoff and to control the water
quality of field effluents.  Runoff basins are number coded; for example,
B-22-2 means runoff basin #2 of field #22 (MSDGC, 1972c through g, and
1973 m  through o).

     Sludge is applied to the fields from early spring to late fall.
Periods of sludge application to various fields are shown schematically
in Figure III-10.  Work hours are approximately 8 hours per day at the
beginning of the application season, increase to a maximum of 16 hours
per day in May, and taper off to 8 hours per day at the end of the sea-
son.  Application on one field is completed before beginning on another
field.  It takes one hour to complete application on 2 acres of land
(MSDGC, 1975J).  The sludge application rate in dry tons per acre and
total  tonnage of sludge applied per year are summarized in Table III-l.
The goals of sludge application for 1974 and 1975 are presented in
Figures  III-ll and 111-12, respectively.
                              111-12

-------
Figure III-8.    Injection Unit Showing  Three  Injectors  (MSDGC,  1975h)
                                111-13

-------
Mcure III-9.   Sludge Application Fields at the Project Site
               and Their Runoff Retention Basins (MSDGC, 1975d)
                              111-14

-------

l_
9
S
fr
£
2
L
ZL
11
OL
6
8

9
S
fr
£
2
L
21
11
01
6
8
L
9
S
fr
£
2
L
2L
LL
OL
6
y
L
9
S
fr
£
Z
I

-------
Table III-l.  Sludge Application  Rates  and Amounts
              (MSDGC- 1973  a  through  h,
                      1974  a  through  1,
                      1975  a  through  g)



Field
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
32
33
37
38

Field Size
(acres)
46
52
41
80
30
15
110
71
93
94
21
27
36
70
22
150
88
38
114
39
52
22
—
38
64
43
31
69
18.5
15
19
68.9
54.2


Year 1973
dt/acre

—
1.21
0.50
0.58
__
0.49
0.95
2.38
--
__
--
—
—
—
__
--
1.35
0.37
1.50
0.57
--
—
--
--
__
--
--
--
--
	
—
™ ™
dt

--
49.6
40.0
17.4
_ _
53.9
67.5
221.3
—
_ _.
--
—
--
--
__
—
5T.3
42.2
58.5
29.6
--
—
--
—
__
—
--
--
—
_ _
—
™ ™

Year
dt/acre
19.0
24.0
24.4
24.5
23.2
0.2
21.3
12.1
16.3
25.8
29.4
17.0
16.2
6.6
29.1
17.6
19.2
16.4
23.4
27.2
6.3
--
0.5
9.7
27.3
20.2
17.2
20.1
8.4
3.6
4.1
7.2
1.9

1974
dt
874.0
1,248.0
1,000.4
1,960.0
696.0
3.0
2,343.0
859.1
1,515.9
2,425.2
617.4
459.0
583.2
462.0
640.2
2,640.0
1,689.6
623.2
2,667.6
1,060.8
327.6
--
— •
368.6
1,747.2
868.6
533.2
1,386.9
155.4
54.0
77.9
496.8
103.0
Year
1975
(May, June & July)
dt/acre
19.5
14.8
3.5
19.9
29.1
	
13.4
17.7
6.7
16.6
27.4
16.3
7.7
6.9
27.7
14.9
9.4
14.6
--
17.7
17.5
7.3
—
11.3
—
	
—
--
--
--
	
—
— ~
dt
897.0
769.6
143.5
1,592.0
873.0
_• _
1,474.0
1,256.7
623.1
1,500.4
575.4
440.1
277.2
483.0
609.4
2,235.0
827.2
554.8
--
690.3
910.0
160.6
--
429.4
--
_ _
—
--
--
--
	
__
~ ~

                       111-16

-------
                                                         Ol

                                                         M
  rt

 z*

2*S

08*
o u-
                                                         en
aioy^sNoi IIM
                          111-17

-------
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                      •o
                                                                                                      n
                                                                                                      N
                                                                                                      O>
                                                                               s

                                                                               M
                                                                               CO
                                                                               r>
                                                                                                          <
                                                                                                          Q
                                                                                                  ttm
                                                                                                  So?
                                                                                                  i- i a.
                                                                                                  Out
                                                                                                  >- tn <
                                                                               >•    I-
                                                                               z    •-
                                                                               iu    2
                                                                               5    £
                                                                               £    «
                                                                               0    5
<
*-
o
                                                                                    <
                                                                                    O
o.
0.
                                                                                                      $    J   $
                                                                                                      CL
                                                                                                      O.
                                                                                                    oc
                                                                                                    IU U
                                                                               u
                                                                               Z
                                                                                                           Z
                                                                                                           O
                                                                    Q
                                                                    5
                                                                    o
     -5 MJ   -^
     -1   S:
       u   «fc
                                                                                                    2
                                                                                                    _J VI
     S   1
     Q.   <
     IK   U

     5   £
         a.

     Z   *
     O   >•

     5   «
     S   ft


     a   O
     <  %
         *
                                                                                                                               OJ
                                                                                                                               N
                               S-LD
                               oj r~~
                               u_ 01

                               •a
                               •i- S-
                               3 o
                               O-M-

                               _1 10

                                  (ti
                               O) O
                               CD CD
                               -a
                               3-0
                               i— C
                               OO (O

                               O) CO
                               CD 00
                               re ai
                               s s-
                               O) C7>
                               00 O
                               3  O
                               O •!-
                              O +->
                                  to
                               E  O
                               O -r-
                              •(-> i —
                              i—  Q-
                               3  a.
                                                                                                  CNJ

                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                                              S-
                                                                                                                              3
                                                                                                                              CJ>
3     ?'
o     «
o
3H3V/  SNO1   13M
                                                               111-18

-------
B.   ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AND MONITORING SYSTEMS

     To ensure against environmental  degradation  resulting from project
operation, some systems for protection  were  incorporated into the project
during the planning and development  stages.   These  include lining of hold-
ing basins to prevent groundwater contamination from seepage or percolation
of sludge, control berms and basins  to  contain  storm runoff from each field
and to control water quality of field effluents,  and terracing and grading
of fields to reduce runoff velocity,  erosion  and  sedimentation.   The effec-
tiveness of these control  systems and the environmental  soundness of project
operations have been monitored using  five systems pertaining to sludge, water,
soil  and rock, plants and  aquatic biota,  and  air.

     1.   Holding and Runoff Basins

          The holding basins were constructed following  the engineering
     recommendations which concluded  a  subsurface investigation and evalu-
     ation (A&H Engineering Corporation,  1971).   The interior of a holding
     basin was contoured to take advantage of the natural  grade.   No slopes
     within the basins are steeper than 1:5.  A continuous compact earth
     lining was constructed within the  perimeter  of the  basin enbankment to
     prevent groundwater contamination.   The  earth  lining  has a minimum 2-
     foot thickness of compact clay.  The degree  of compaction is specified
     in the subsurface study report.

          The fields were  contoured  or  terraced and retention berms or
     slotted application standpipes  constructed at  the tops of the terrace
     underdrains.  These features were  designed to  retain  storm runoff in the
     fields long enough to allow most of the  silt to settle in the fields
     rather than wash into the retention basins.  A typical  runoff retention
     basin is shown in Figure 111-13.   Runoff retained in  the basins is not
     released unless it meets applicable water  quality standards.  Runoff of
     substandard quality can be recycled by  pumping it back on the fields.
                                   111-19

-------


tBESSBBIAPPROX. MSDGC  PROPERTY
       LINE.
       DIKE (lOfttr WIDE TOP)
	BE RM (5 FEET WIDE TOP)
   A   SOUNDING (DEPTH IN TEC!)
   '&   TAKEN APWL,I973
ctauaiai TERRACE
                 DITCH
                 MATCH  LINE
                 BASIN IKUT
                 HSVi CONTOUR LINE
                          BASINS
  Figure  III-13.
Typical  Storm Runoff Retention
Basin  (MSDGC, 1973n)
                           111-20

-------
In Figure 111-14,  retention berms and basins, terraces and dikes,
basin inlet and outfall, and outfall  control  structures are shown
for a typical field.  The original and modified contours are also
indicated.

2.   Sludge and Water Monitoring

     To ensure adequate treatment of sludge before it is transported
to the holding basins at the project site, the sludge quality must
comply with standards as specified in the project's operating permit.
A sludge analysis program was designed for this purpose.  Twenty-four
hour composite samples of sludge being barged to the project site are
analyzed.  In addition to measuring the volatile acids, pH value, total
alkalinity and volatile solids, as required by the permit, total  solids,
total phosphorus, Kjeldahl nitrogen,  ammonia  nitrogen, and electrical
conductivity are determined for each composite sample.  Occasionally,
concentrations of chloride, sulfate,  and 14 metal elements are deter-
mined.  The supernatants returned from the holding basins are sampled
and analyzed to the same extent.  A typical data log is presented in
Table III-2.  A detailed discussion of the results is given in Section
VILA.

     The water monitoring system includes water sampling, analysis,
data reporting and data reduction.  Water samples are taken from 26
wells, 1 spring, 11 stream sampling stations  located on eight creeks
or streams, effluent sampling stations at runoff basins, and at a num-
ber of reservoirs.  The locations of sampling stations are indicated in
Figure 111-15.  Water quality parameters analyzed and reported on include:

     t    Physical parameters such as total suspended solids (TSS),
          total dissolved solids (TDS), total volatile solids (TVS),
          electrical conductivity, and temperature
     •    Chemical parameters such as pH, total alkalinity, dissolved
          oxygen (D.O.), total phosphorus (P), total Kjeldahl nitro-
          gen  (N), ammonia nitrogen (NHs-N),  nitrate and nitrate
          nitrogen (I\I02+N03-N)
     •    Anions such as chloride (Cl) and sulfate (S04) and cations
          such as potassium (K), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), and mag-
          nesium (Mg)

                               111-21

-------
                                                                                      N
         JCGEKD

ESG D C19  APPHOX. MSDGC PROPERTY LJKE

.MMMHW  DIKE (10 TOOT WIDE TOP)



   A    SOUNDING (DEPTH IH i'ECT) TAKEN
   ^y    UARCH 1^73

mi	•  TERXACE

^	<	  DITCH

_._  MATCH UKE
                                                      BASIN INLCT

                                                      DIHECTION Or PLOWING

                                                      •ETENTIW; BASINS

                                                      riELDS UkDER CONTKACT 72-U«.ID

                                                      EXISTING CONTOUKS

                                                 X?	  FIIOPOSEO CONTOUKS

                                                 2J    WATEH rLFVATIONV TV KCH. • M/TI
Figure  111-14.     Drainage  Control  Features of a  Typical  Field  (MSDGC, 1973n)

                                            111-22

-------
               Table III-2.
Fulton County Land Reclamation Project Sewage
Sludge Analysis,  April  1975 (MSDGC,  1975g)



Total Solids %
Total Volatile Solids %
Volatile Acids** (mg/1)
pH
Total P (mg/1)
Cl- (mg/1)
S04= (mg/1)
N-Kjeldahl (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1 )
Alkalinity as CaCOa (m9/!)
Electrical Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Al (mg/1)
Cd (mg/1)
Ca (mg/1)
Cr (mg/1)
Cu (mg/1)
Fe (mg/1)
Pb (mg/1)
Hg (jjg/1)
Mg (mg/1 )
Mn (mg/1)
Ni (mg/1)
K (mg/1)
Na (mg/1)
Zn (mg/1)

MDL*




0.01
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.01
1.0
0.02
0.01
0.1
0.03
0.1
1.0
0.01
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.1

4/3
3.72
52.62
67.00
7.40
980.00
292.00

2,849.00
1,344.00
3,900.00
7,300.00
220.00
7.00
1,200.00
93.80
48.00
1,370.00
30.40
151.00
500.00
13.20
13.00
220.00
110.00
115.00
Date
4/5
3.38
54.15
67.00
7.50
830.00 1


2,681.00 2
1,372.00 1
4,780.00 4
8,000.00 7






(no samples








4/6
3.37
55.68
45.00
7.80
,010.00


,513.00
,421.00
,920.00
,500.00






taken)








4/7
3.42
54.62
90.00
7.60
890.00
404.00

2,632.00
1,435.00
4,940.00
8,000.00
200.00
7.00
1,010.00
86.90
48.80
1,652.00
32.60
140.00
490.00
14.80
13.00
200.00
150.00
98.00

 *MDL - minimum detection limit of laboratory.
**As acetic acid.
                                          111-23

-------
                                   pt—M J———n—v
                                    W27j   329!, \
                                                                    ILL.9
                                                                            Of»,
                                                                            T«n*(>

                                                                            Boniir i
                                                                            T,rH
                                                                              N
                                                                              *
                                                                       ' L 't pool  I iverpool
                                                                       U.",p   l«sp E
                                                             Key:
                                                             W = Well
                                                             R = Reservoir
                                                             S = Stream
Figure  111-15.  Water  Monitoring  Locations in  Fulton County  (MSDGC, 1975C1)
                                  III-:-.

-------
     t    Trace metals such as zinc (In), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu),
          chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), iron (Fe), alumi-
          num (Al), mercury (Hg), and selenium (Se)
     •    Biological and microbiological parameters such as 5-day
          biological oxygen demand (BOD5) and fecal coliforms.

     In addition, groundwater elevations have been observed and re-
corded monthly.  Water samples are collected and examined every month,
and findings are summarized in a monthly report entitled Environmental
Protection System Report for Fulton County, Illinois.  Typical examples
of data are given in Tables III-3 and  III-4.   The former table reports
the quality of well, reservoir,  spring and stream waters;  the latter
shows the qualify of effluent from retention  basins.   Samples taken
prior to project operation constitute  baseline information  for the
"no-action" water quality situation.   Changes are revealed by comparing
water quality resulting from project operation with the baseline data.
Detailed discussions in this regard are presented in sections VII.D.
and VII.E.

3.   Soil, Biota and Air Monitoring

     Prior to project operation, 52 soil borings to bedrock approxi-
mately 40 feet deep were made to determine the physical and chemical
Characteristics of soils and rock.  Physical  tests included the penetra-
tion test, strength test, density test, compressibility test, permea-
bility test, and field pumping tests.   Strati graphs of types of soils
and their geographical distribution were established.  The texture,
color, moisture content, grain size distribution, and permeability of
the spoil material were analyzed  (A&H Engineering Corporation, 1971).
Chemical analyses included exchangeable calcium, organic carbon, and
hydrochloric acid-extractable metals such as manganese, zinc, copper,
cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead, and aluminum, for both spoils and
place land (MSDGC, 1975h).  It was proposed that, 5 years after pro-
ject initiation (1977), another set of soil borings would be made to
bedrock to investigate changes in soil chemistry (Dalton and Murphy,
1973).  Detailed discussions on these data can be found in sections
IV.B. and VII.F.
                              111-25

-------
          Table  III-3.
Fulton County Land Reclamation  Project
Water Analysis,  April 1975  (MSDGC,  1975g)
                         Well Data
              Reservoir.Data  Stream  &  Spring Data

Sampling
DATE:

PH
TOTAL P
CL-
sol=
N-KJELDAHL
N-NH3
N-N02+N03


Stations:


MG/L
•I
•I
•I
n
•1
ALK AS CAC03 "
ELEC.COND.
K
NA
CA
MG
ZN
CO
CU
CR
HI
MN
PB
Ft
AL
HG
SE
FC PER
D.O.
TEKP.
STATIC H20
BOD
UMHOS/C
MG/L
n
n
ii
n
n
M
n
n
n
n
it
M
UG/L
MG/L
100 ML
MG/L
°C
EL. FT.
MG/L
MDL*

0.01
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.1
0.01
1.0

1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.1
1.0
0.1
0.2
2
0.5




Wl
I/ 7

7.20
0.15
15.00
192.00
0.80
0.70
0.01
390.00
700.00
0.00
12.00
121.00
60.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
3.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00





	
W2
I/ 7 j

7.10
0.38
21.00
67.00
1.30
1.10
0.00
420.00
650.00
0.00
12.00
121.00
52.00
0.20
0.00
0.00 '
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
7.10
0.00
. 0.00
0.00
0.00

1




,
'£















El 1
«
I/ 9

7.80
0.09
9.00
185.00
1.50
0.10
3.18
360.00
825.00
3.00

135.00
71.00
0.00

*-r o.oo














0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
11.10
3.00
2.00
811.00

R2 1 1 SPR
I/ 9/A I/ 7
1
8.10
0.13
12.00
193.00
l.bO
0.30
2.56
t70. 00
950.00
3.oo
20.00
165.00
72.00
0.00
0.00
.
r
















7.70
0.10
15.00
1383.00
0.80
0.80
0.09
500.00
2600.00
8.00
137.00
528.00
195.00
0.00
0.00
I-JIJ
O.OOff 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
2.00
11.50
1.00
5.00
913.00
_














0.00
o.oo •
1.67
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00


10.00
3230.00
si
D/16

7.80
0.56
29.00
360.00
2.10
1.10
3.16
260.00
900.00
1.00
66.00
130.00
68.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.10
0.00
7.2E+OM


37.00
8'43.00
52
1/16

7.80
0.33
27.00
501.00
2.30
0.90
3.10
210.00
1000.00
1.00
76.00
135.00
78.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
• o.no
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.10
0.00
3900.00


16.00
1010.00

"HDlsMINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT OF LABORATORY. ALL VALU65 LESS
 THAN THESE ARE REPORTED AS ZERO.
                                 111-26

-------
   Table 111-4.    Retention  Basin  Effluent Quality
                  (MSDGC,  1975g)
    Field Runoff Basin  Log  at  the  District  Site in
                Fulton  County,  Illinois

Basin number
Stage reading
Date opened/checked
R&D approval
Sampled
Date closed
No. days open
Discharge (MG)
Comments
4-1
35%
9:30 a.m.
4/15
Yes
Yes
3:00 p.m.
4/15
0.23
0.04

5-1
35%
9:45 a.m.
4/15
Yes
Yes
9:30 a.m.
4/17
2.00
0.31

7-3
60%
10:15 a.m.
4/15
Yes
Yes
10:15 a.m.
4/21
6.00
0.72

8-1
45%
10:30 a.m.
4/15
Yes
Yes
8:00 a.m.
4/16
0.90
0.42

Field Runoff Basins  -  Water  Analysis  and  Discharges  at
            Fulton County  During  April  1975

Date Sampled
Source
TSS mg/1
BOD mg/1
FC per 100 ml
Date discharged
Quantity MG
4-15-75
B-2-2
43
4
410
4-15-75
0.32
4-15-75
B-3-1
38
8
20
4-15-75
1.48
4-15-75
B-4-1
220
23
OO
4-15-75
0.04
4-15-75
B-5-1
33
7
410
4-15-75
0.31
                         111-27

-------
     The chemical composition of plants grown in sludge-fertilized
fields and those grown on control plots have been determined to
evaluate the plants' nutrient uptake rates and to detect any build-
up of chemical constituents.  The analysis included samples from
stalks, leaves and grain of the fertilized plants.   A detailed eval-
uation of this data is performed in Section IX.

     An ecological study of aquatic biota in streams and reser-
voirs was initiated in June 1971.  Fish and plankton have been sam-
pled, collected and analyzed monthly, and data reported quarterly.
The fishery study includes fish population, diversity, and the body
condition or "well being" of various fish species such as bluegill,
large mouth bass and green sunfish.  The body condition of the fish
population is determined and reported by the weight-length factor
or condition factor K.  The plankton study of reservoir water in-
cludes plankton counts and population distribution  among identified
species.

     Besides these ecological data, more than 38 physical, chemi-
cal, and biological parameters of the sample water  are analyzed for
studies of phenomena such as lake eutrophication.  These include
pH value, conductivity, alkalinity, solids concentrations, different
forms of nitrogen compounds, total  phosphorus, dissolved oxygen,
water temperature, water transparency, 14 metals, and several  ca-
tions (MSDGC, 1972a through 1975g;  Campell and Lind, 1969; General
Water Quality Standards for Illinois' Waters).  Control  reservoir
10 has been maintained to differentiate changes  in  conditions  of
fish and plankton from such conditions in the non-control  reser-
voirs which receive discharges from field runoff basins.

     To establish the air quality situation at the  site, a meteoro-
logical station was set up close to the holding  basins and an  air
sampling program designed.  Air temperature, wind speed and direc-
tion, relative humidity and rainfall  were observed  daily and com-
piled in a monthly report.  In addition to general  weather observa-
tions, atmospheric ammonia concentration has been monitored at the


                             111-28

-------
downwind berm of the holding basins  on  a  batch  basis.   During  am-
monia monitoring periods, average wind  speed and  direction,  air
temperature, dew point,  and volume of air sampled are  measured.
Detailed discussions on  the weather  and ammonia observations as
related to odor problems are presented  in sections IV.A and  VII.B,
respectively.  An example of the data log is given in  Table  III-5
below.
  Table III-5.
Atmospheric NH3 Concentrations and Sampling
Conditions at the MSDGC Liquid Fertilizer
Holding Basins in Fulton County During April
1975 (MDSGC,  1975d)

Date
Basin
Berm
Starting Time
Total Time Minutes
Air Volume Sampled Liters
Dew Point oc
Air Temperature °C
Wind Direction
Mean Wind Speed mph
Atmospheric N^ ppm (v/v)
4-4-75
3A
SW
1045
90
1201.75
1
3
N-NE
4
0.14
4-7-75
2
SW
1030
90
1314.44
2
4
E
11
0.05
4-9-75
2
SW
1405
90
925.27
10.5
16
E
10
0.52
4-25-75
3A
S
1014
90
924.40
9
13
N-NW
15
0.53
4-28-75
1
N
1029
90
1354.30
16.5
23.5
SW
8
0.73

                           111-29

-------
                               BIBLIOGRAPHY
A&H Corporation, Subsurface Investigation and Evaluation, Land Reclamation
and Beautification Project^ Fulton County, Illinois, prepared for the
MSDGC, 1971.

Dalton, F. E. and R. R. Murphy, "Land Disposal IV:  Reclamation and Re-
cycle," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V.  45, No. 7, July,
1973.

Lynam, B. T., et al., The Utilization of Municipal Sludge in Agriculture,
presented at the United States/Soviet Seminar on Handling, Treatment, and
Disposal of Sludges, Moscow, U.S.S.R., May 1975h.

MSDGC, Contract Nans^ for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage
1, Zone I.'Fulton County, Illinois, 1972c.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage 2,
Zone  I. Fulton County, Illinois. 1972d.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stages
3 through 5, Fulton County, Illinois, 1972e,f,g.

MSDGC, Contract Hans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stages
6 through 9, Fulton County, Illinois, 1973m,n,o.

MSDGC, Environmental Protection System Reports for Fulton Couoty, Illinois,
Third and Fourth Quarters, 1972a,b.

MSDGC, Environmental Protection System Reports for Fulton County, Illinois.
First through Third Quarters, 1973a,b,c.

MSDGC, Environmental Protection System Reports for Fulton County. Illinois.
August through December, 1973d,e,f,g,h.

MSDGC, Environmental Protection System Reports for Fulton County. Illinois,
January through December, 1974a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l.

MSDGC, Environmental Protection System Reports for Fulton County. Illinois,
January through July, 1975a,b,c,d,e,f,g.

MSDGC, Private Communication with Mr. Bill Macaitis, Engineer of Planning,
October 1975i.

MSDGC, Private Communication with George Hall, 1975J.
                                   111-30

-------
                 IV.   PRESENT CONDITIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENT

     Before environmental impacts resulting from the project can be assessed,
existing environmental conditions must be defined.  It is evident that sewage
sludge disposal will affect the physical environment of the application site
and surroundings, but a project of this magnitude can also exert a major in-
fluence upon socio-economic characteristics of the entire county.

     This chapter provides a description of baseline information concerning
climate, topography, geology, soils, hydrology, water quality, biology and
ecosystems.    Past and projected trends in local population and the economy
are presented along with the established and forecast land use patterns
and land development potential.  The chapter concludes with a discussion of
natural and cultural resources in Fulton County that are particularly sensi-
tive to planned project operations.

A.   CLIMATE AND TOPOGRAPHY

     Past and present climatic conditions and local  meteorology must be de-
termined in order to predict the most probable and worst conditions affecting
future project operations.  This analysis helps to identify potential  air
quality problems such as odor transmission and dispersion of airborne toxic
or pathogenic materials resulting from sludge application.

     The area climate, which is a record of numerous atmospheric events, must
be defined by weather elements such as temperature,  wind, cloud cover, solar
radiation, humidity, precipitation, and atmospheric  stability.  Climatic data
from two weather stations are used for analysis.  Weather station #14842 is
located at the Greater Peoria Airport approximately  25 miles east-northeast
of the project site (National Climatic Center, 1974a).  The second weather
station was set up by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
at the project site (MSDGC,  1975b).

     In addition to climate, local topography is summarized in terms of cha-
racteristics which could influence the microclimate  and create susceptibility
to impacts on air and water quality.
                                IV-1

-------
1.    General  Meteorology

     The climate of this area is typically continental,  as is evidenced
by the changeable weather and wide range of temperature  extremes.   Meter-
ological characteristics of the project area are discussed in the  follow-
ing sections.

     a.   Temperature and precipitation - According to 40-year observa-
     tions at the Peoria Airport station, the average monthly tempera-
     ture varies from 25°F to 75°F,  with an annual  average of 51.1°F.
     The patterns of variation in monthly average,  maximum, and mini-
     mum temperatures are shown in Figure IV-1.   Using a baseline  of
     65°F, there is an average of 6,200 annual  heating degree days and
     943 cooling degr'ee days (National  Climatic  Center,  1974a).

          The annual rainfall, as recorded at Peoria Airport, averages
     34.99 inches, with a maximum of 50.27 inches and a  minimum of 23.99
     inches.   Variations in monthly mean, maximum,  and minimum precipi-
     tation are shown in Figure IV-2.   The monthly  maximum and minimum
     rainfalls are displayed for the Peoria Airport station, but the
     monthly means measured at both Peoria Airport  and the project site
     are shown for overlapping observation periods.  In  spite of the
     25-mile  distance  between these two stations, the  precipitation
     pattern is quite uniform.  The maximum amount  of rainfall occurring
     in any 24-hour period was 5.52 inches in May 1927.   The predicted
     24-hour rainfall patterns for Fulton County at four recurrence inter-
     vals (1-year, 5-year, 25-year, and 100-year) are presented in Table
     IV-1.  The cumulative amount of rainfall is estimated to be 6.53
     inches for a 24-hour, 100-year rain storm.

          The average annual snowfall is normally 23.1 inches, with a
     maximum of 42.3 inches and a minimum of 7.8 inches.  Variations in
     monthly mean, maximum, and minimum snowfalls are given in Figure
      IV-3.  Snowfall usually begins in late September and ends in  early
     May.  December through February are freezing months during which
     snow accumulation  is at a maximum and snow melting  at a minimum.
                              IV-2

-------
                                                cu
                                                en
                                                eo
                                                i-
                                                d)
                                                                    E
                                                                    3
                                                                    x
                                                                    re
                                                                    c
                                                                    o
                           cu
                           en
                           re

                           cu
                           >
                          >

                          .c
                                                                            o
                                                                 E
                                                                 a
                                                                 -M
                                                                 C
                                                                 O
                                                                                                            C

                                                                                                            O
                                                                                                                      cu
                                                                                                                      i-
                                                                     re

                                                                     cu
                                                                                                                      "
                                                                                                                      3

                                                                                                                     J
                                                                                                                     TD r-

                                                                                                                      reo
                                                                                                                      EO-;


                                                                                                                      X
                                                                                                                      re E
                                                                                                                      at
                                                                                                                      en re
                                                                                                                      re^->
                                                                                                                      s- re
                                                                                                                      cu o


                                                                                                                     -re
                                                                                                                      c re «f
                                                                                                                      o -i-" f^-
                                                                                                                     •^ oo en
                                                                                                                      s-  o  s-
                                                                                                                      re  D- cu

                                                                                                                         £  c
                                                                                                                     q_ 
                                                                                                                      cu
                                                                                                                      en
o
O
O
CO
o
LT>
o
ro
O
CM
                                                              IV-3

-------
                      •*
                      r~-
                      CTi

                       I
                      un
                      co
                      en
                   x  •>
                   fl3 4J
                   s: s_
                      o

                   ^e-
                   ^: •!-
                   •«-> <
                   c
                   O "3


                      O
                      O)
                      D_
*d-
r^
en
r—
1
CM
r^
C CD
tQ i—
cu
2: -
+->
>> s-
i— a
JC 0.
-t-i i-
C -i-
0 <
s:
03
• r-
S-
o
co
Q.

	 »
LT>
r*~
en
r^
1
CM
E r~-
ro cr>
(U I—
s:
n
>, OJ
r— +J
-C •!-
+-) OO
c
O 4->
s: o
O)
•>~3
O
s_
Q.
«S-
r~-
cr>
^~
i
LO
oo
C CTi
fO r-
d)
s: «
+->
>5 S-
•— O
J^ Q.
•M S-
C -i-
0 «C
s:
rO
•r—
S-
o
o>
Q.
•=3-
r~~
Ch
r—
1
UD
E oo
rs CT>
E •—
•r™
c •>
•r— +J
2: s-
O
>) CL
i— i.
-C •!-
-M 
D.
 X
JL
                                                           /  /•'
                                J	1	'        '       '
                                                                               O
                                                                             o


                                                                             03 -Q
                                                                                      U
                                                                                      0)   -

                                                                                      S-  S-.
                                                                                     Q_  O)
                                                                                      Z3   o
                                                                                     CO QJ
                                                                                     •r- Q_


                                                                                     03 +->

                                                                                     >• fO
                                                                                     CM
                                                                                      I
                                                                                     cu
                                                                            CD

                                                                            ul
cn
       oo      r



    (S8LJDUL)
                      <£>
                                     00     CM
                       IV-4

-------























0)
IQ
| —





















in
o


CM


CO
CM

CM
CM

^
CM

O
CM

2


00


£
ID
in



2

m



OJ
8. •—
3
S
P—

O


o>



CO



r-s


tO



in


^


CO



CM





o




>

CO
o

g


r-





CM
*
in
to


CO
CM
CO


CO
o

CO

s

CM


CO


^.
r—


r^


^


j _



Cft
o




r —
o


rx,
O
CD
u •— y»
C >
3 -(->
u c o
0) i-« O
in
CO
o


in
CO
o


i£>
§
*
to
s

«
o

CO
°
J^
o


o

1
in



CM
r-
co

^.


CM

"

CO
r-.


CO
.

CM
cn
°.

§*"


S
o

00
LA
O

VO

c>
*
§

to

o

in
0



S


in
CM
CO
CM
O

ro
CM
§
•
in
CO
o

in
CO
o

in
ro
o

r«.
§
cn
in
o
*
in
o
CM
§
O

to
PS.
*"!!
^
CM

CO


CM

in
'
o»
CM


-


PS.
o


en
tn
o

£
o
*
P*.

o

m
CO
o
tn
CO
o

in
ro
O

in
CO
0


1-
s


in
°



g



CM
0

CM
O

ro
o


CO
o
CO
o


s
*
in
o
9




*


CT\
CO

r—

cn
CM

g


S


m
o


§


CO
0


CO
o


in
CM
o
CM
o

CM
o


CM
0


S-
s


p~"
IV-5

-------
                                      X
                                      to
o
CM
                                                                                             -   rr>
                                                                                             -   cC
-  o
                                                                                             -  
Z3 (O
U_ E Q'-^
•r- -O
X S- ^d-
fQ fO r^"*
2! OJ 
•~3 « 1
CO -
-C n3 «d- S_
-l-> O) O)
c s: --(->
0 C C
o s: >> o m
4-> ro O
C 4-> T-
O t/1 •!->
                                                                                                         •r- O «—
                                                                                                            0-0
                                                                                                         co S_
                                                                                                         C -r- r—
                                                                                                         O =£ fO
                                                                                                         •r-    C
                                                                                                         -(-> rO O
                                                                                                         (O -r- T-
                                                                                                         •i- S- +J
                                                                                                         S- O (T3
                                                                                                         ns O) :s
                                                                                                         > Q-	
                                                                                                         CO
                                                                                                          I
                                                                                                         OJ
                                                                                                         01
                                  (S9LJOUL)  LL6J-MOUS
                                                       IV-6

-------
b.   Wind vectors - Wind data is recorded for direction and speed.
By dividing the number of recorded wind vectors within a given sec-
tor of wind direction and interval of wind speed by the total num-
ber of observations, the frequency of winds in that vector interval
can be established.  Normally 16 wind directions 22.5 degrees apart
are chosen for this type of analysis, along with four wind speed
intervals (0-3, 3.1-6, 6.1-10, and 10.1 mph or higher).  The aver-
age wind vector frequencies at Greater Peoria Airport between 1964
and 1973 are given in Table IV-2.  Calm periods normally occur dur-
ing 2.83% of the year.

     The vector frequencies presented in Table IV-2 were used to
construct a wind "rose" as shown in Figure IV-4.  The vectors in
this figure indicate wind directions and contain four segments,
each representing a wind speed interval with the lowest wind
speeds beginning at the core of the rose.  The frequency of wind
in a given wind speed interval and wind direction is proportional
to the length of its representative segment.  This wind rose indi-
cates that southerly winds prevail in this general area for all
wind velocities.  Winds from other sectors are rather uniformly
distributed.  A wind rose representing conditions at the holding
basins on the project site was constructed and is shown in Figure
IV-5.  Data were available for approximately 3 years only; there-
fore, the level of statistical confidence in this case is not as
high.  At the project site, there is a strong southerly wind
component as there is at Peoria Airport.  However, at the site,
winds from the southwest and west-northwest sectors are similarly
important.  The differences between the two wind roses are believed
to be due to differences' in local terrain.

c.  Atmospjieric stability - In air pollution studies concerning
the dispersion of airborne materials, atmospheric stability,
which is a measure of the mixing capacity of the atmosphere, is
of major interest.  A stable atmposphere has a limited mixing
ability and provides little capacity for the dilution of air pol-
lutants.  Pasquill  introduced a system for the classification of
                         IV-7

-------
      Table IV-2.
Average Annual Frequencies of Wind Vectors in Percentage,
Greater Peoria Airport, January 1964 through December 1973
(National Climatic Center, 1974a)


Wind
Direction
North
North-Northeast
Northeast
East-Northeast
East
East-Southeast
Southeast
South-Southeast
South
South-Southwest
Southwest
West-Southwest -
West
West-Northwest
Northwest
North-Northwest




Wind SjDeed (mph)
0-3.0
0.63
0.41
0.38
-.45
0.46
0.41
0.46
0.48
1.33
0.58
0.59
0.63
0.66
0.53
0.44
0.41
3.1-6.0
1.80
1.04
1.03
1.33
1.46
1.13
1.47
1.86
4.51
1.63
1.50
1.40
1.55
1.44
1.29
1.16
6.1-10.0
2.44
1.15
1.58
1.91
2.26
1.41
2.02
2.40
7.20
1.84
1.92
1.61
2.16
2.02
2.24
1.78
>10.1
1.87
0.57
1.14
1.27
1.16
0.68
1.18
2.08
5.44
1.35
1.28
1.18
2.95
3.86
2.43
1.16
All 4 Wind Speed
Intervals for Given
Wind Direction
6.74
3.17
4.13
4.96
5.34
3.63
5.13
6.82
18.48
5.40
5.29
4.82
7.33
7.85
6.40
4.51
All 16 Wind Direc-
tions for Given
Wind Speed Interval
   8.85*
25.60
35.95
29.60
100.00
      periods account for 2.83% annually.
                                      IV-8

-------
                                                                  in 4->
                                                                  c o
                                                                 •i- O)
                                                                   ••->
                                                                  re o
                                                                 CO S_
                                                                     D-
                                                                  »'->
                                                                  re 4-> -Q
                                                                  t- c in
                                                                  o 3 i-^
                                                                 +-> o CTI
                                                                 OO O i—
                                                                  (0 O O
                                                                     +-> CD
                                                                  <1J r— Q
                                                                  I/) 3 00
                                                                  O U- 21
                                                                 T3 O  (U
                                                                  C Q -M
                                                                 •i- CO i-
                                                                  IT)
                                                                  QJ
                                             CO
                                             CO
                                             CM
                                                                   C r— T-
                                                                   O     i—
                                                                  •r-  >>0
                                                                  -(->  S-
                                                                   re  re <—
                                                                  4->  3  re
                                                                  oo  c  c
                                                                      re  o

                                                                   re     4->
                                                                   o   "re
                                                                  •r-  i/i z:

                                                                   o  o
                                                                  i—  c oo
                                                                   o "i"" r^-
                                                                   S- r— CTl
                                                                   O <— i— "—•
                                                                   CD i—i     re

                                                                   o>   »  oi  i—
                                                                  s:  re JQ  en
                                                                     •i—  £  r—
                                                                  4->  S-  O>
                                                                   re  o  (j   •
                                                                      QJ  O)  S-
                                                                   O) D- O  
                                                                   O   • J=  C
                                                                  Qi CM  CD O)
                                                                     ^*  3  C_3
                                                                  -a co  o
                                                                   c ^J-  s-  o
                                                                  •I- 1— .C  •!-
                                                                  •^ s^ 4J  4_)
                                                                   cu
                                                                   5-
                                              re
                                             o
IV-9

-------
atmospheric stability (Turner, 1964).   Parameters considered
in this system include net solar insolation,  solar altitude,
cloud cover and ceiling height, wind speed,  and the presence of
urbanization.   There are seven stability classes:  Class A, ex-
tremely unstable; Class B, unstable; Class C, slightly unstable;
Class D, neutral; Class E, slightly stable;  Class F, stable; and
Class G, extremely stable.  Based on data collected at the Greater
Peoria Airport station, the annual  and seasonal percentages of
occurrence for each stability class are summarized in Table IV-3.
The predominant atmospheric condition  in the  area is Pasquill  Sta-
bility Class D, a neutral atmosphere,  with an annual frequency of
57.75%, or 211 days per year.

d.   Typical weather conditions - Climatic conditions in the Peoria
area are summarized in Table IV-4.   The annual  prevailing wind is
southerly with a yearly mean speed  of  10.3 mph.  Relative humidity
is seldom below 50%, ranging between 62 and  83 percent (annual
average).  The average number of days  with heavy fog or visibility
equal to or less than 1/4 mile ranges  from 1  to 3 days per month
and peaks during winter.  Nighttime radiational loss is believed to
be the major factor contributing to poor visibility.  Ground fog
normally occurs during the night and at dawn.  Periods of low ceiling
height and light wind can lead to severe conditions during which air
pollutants accumulate at ground level.  The  annual joint frequency
of low ceiling height and light wind is 0.2678% which is equivalent
to only 24 hours in a year.

     In brief, the most probable weather conditions in the study
area are a neutral atmosphere (Pasquill Stability Class D) and
southerly winds at 10.2 mph.  A calm atmosphere with a mixing
height of less than 100 meters and wind speed less than 1 mph re-
presents the worst conditions in terms of air pollution potential.
In regard to soil erosion, sedimentation, and water quality prob-
lems, the 24-hour, 100-year storm can be justified as the worst
condition, resulting in a rainfall  of 6.53 inches in 24 hours.
                         IV-10

-------

<^~-»
fl3
"^
r**s,
CTi
"~
i.
O)
4-5
C
O)
C_3

o
-1-5
E
(_)

i —
ra
c:
0
•r-
z
— '
c
o

4_J
2
00
s~
o
CL
i-
•r—
<£

ra
•r"
o
O)
a.

s.
CU

re
ai
i.
C-3
O)
-10
4-5
03

^.^
4J
r~_
_Q
ft3
IS
oo

o

£_
CU
J^
CL
C/l
O


-Q

i—


























CO
to
ro
0
£
•r—
r—
•^
o
ra
£
r—
• r—
-^
C^
LO
ra
a_




















•— CU
CU r-
E -Q
CJ3  rc
S- -!->
-!-> CO
X
LiJ


r^  4-^
3
CD
•z.
LO CO
CM m
• •
IT) CO
^O CO


>, 0)
t— r*^
4_i rf)
_C ro
<_> CD +->
•r- l/>
r~~ C
oo r>

I""*- r—
O^ O
• •
CO OO
^—




CU

o
ro
CO -P
to
C
~^

i— co
LO LO
• •
CO O
f—




t— eu
CU i —
E -Q
ef 
4-> to
X C
LU ra


^~ (~~
oo o
• •
O i—












-a
o
S-
ai
CL.





















. 	 ^
>> LO
ra 3
S 01
oO ct

" OS

• ^ A
s- >>
Q. r-
<: 3
•-3
• . r, • •
CD _c a: «
2: o LU cu
1-1 s- 2: c
o: ro s: 3
D. S ID -T3
oo — oo - —


o
^^
•
LO




LO
r*^
•
CO
1 —

o
p-s*
•
•=3-
l~~




t 	
p^
•
*^"
ID



f—
CO
•
CO






p^.
LO
•
CM







^"
o
•
o



. — ^
t-
0)
-Q
E
CU
0
^^
OS
S-
OJ
o
4->
o
0

•«
S-
a>

2
CD
• • 4-^
_l Q.
_J CU
eC OO
1 1 S 	 *


CO
co
•
CM




r-.
o
•
oo



fx^
•
(—
r—




00
co
•
CM
p^



^-
o
•
in






CM
^~
•
o







r—
o
•
o





s~*.
>^
^_
fO
s-
o
CU
o3
"
^
ra
3
C
rO
r^

««
s-
.. CU
ry _Q
LU E
1— CU
•z. o
i—, CU
3 Q


O
co
•
^~




^-
00
*
o
1 —

LO
CM
•
CM
f—




^J.
r^
•
^.
Lf>



^"
CM
•
o
^—





CO
CM
•
r^







co
CO
•
o
























	 |
^£
— ^
~^*
"^"
cC
IV-11

-------






If)
p^
en
J3
•a-
r^
en
•

IO
z


V)
O
c


•t
IO
T
8-

D-

H-
o

IO
CO
!_
^r
OJ
-C
4J
C
V)
c
0

4J
^3
c
o
o

u
•M
U
"4-
o

>,
i?

1
3
00
«a-
i
>
i— »
OJ
S
IO








V)
"O
<4- C
0 •!-
3
5V
C ,C
- I





>o CM r^
i— CO CO
000
o o o



JC
o
IO
UJ |
I 1
£ 3

 v-

if> co en
CM CM r-

0 OO


£ -1
u
s-
co
o.
+J c
J= S-
O) O O
01 Of
ac <-»
cn< — 10
C IO -C
•t- 3 4J
r— CT
•i- LU V>
CO VI
U OJ
•a-
S- -s.
OJ •—
^ -C t- V)
3 ^- ° o eu
z x en _i
o >,
OJ VI U, -4-> L.
en >, -t- o
IO IO >>!—
k a > i- cu
CO IO .O i—
> l»_ QJ •>- -f-
«s o= MS:



r*. en o
ro o CM

OO O












CM r— r—






t- CO >,
O > -M
OJ 4J T3
Ol 10 •!-
c f— E
IO OJ 3
CC C£ X
r— CO i—
CO r^co
^ i i i
s« •* u> r~ .
— ' VO ID Lft




h^U — » ro ro tn
CD -C • • •
•a co Q. CM CM o
C QJ E r-r-r-
5^-
o
c
•r- O
lO'i-
> +J
CO U
^ QJ
°~ i
lo




•§
•*—
CO
Q.









2
Z CO OO
2




.e i—
O T-
L. i- >>
ig O- 10
S en r~-

o o o









O O CM

0












^^ r~- r~~







»— vo r^
.00 CO CO
1 1 1
^0 en en
IT) IT) If)




CM O CO
en oo r^




OO OO OO




4->
V>
CO >) 3
C •— cn
333
-3 -3 <:



cc
UJ
^^

Z3
00





*a- CM r^
CJl CT^ CO
O CM r—
O O O
O O O







O O r—
«S" t^ CM

d oo









10 in a-
r— CO IT>

o o o












i — CM CM







CO f> ro
co co co
1 1 1
in co vo
*O ID VO




co in CM
co en i-^




oo oo oo



u
CU i-
J3 i- OJ
E OJ J5
OJ J3 E
*-> O OJ
Q-4-> >
CO u O
to o z





_J
_l
 en i CM

C3 0 O









IO CO CO 1
o o in i CM

i— i— • O












OO CO PO r— r*
CM OO






ro co r-. oo
co r- r»- co
III 1 LT>
00 CO VO CM r-
r^ 10 vo vo




en CM to oo
dr-^ ^ d
OO


2
OO OO Z OO
3


i- >>
OJ >> S-
JD t- <0 O
E IO 3 OC
CO 3 S- O
U C .Q C_J
co 10 ,
LU 1 — - —
t— ce 03
Z - _J
IV-12

-------
2.   Genera] Topography

     One end result of the large-scale strip mining operations in Ful-
ton County is an extremely rough topography.  Strip mining has left
steeply sloping spoil mounds and a number of long, narrow lakes with
abruptly sloping shorelines scattered about the project site.  These
lakes are mostly supplied by groundwater with a slight contribution
from surface runoff.  Uneven settling of unconsolidated and clayey
soils within the mined sections has produced an almost undulating sur-
face.  In addition, the project area is covered with rocks and potholes.
The application fields have been prepared for agricultural use by level-
ling and grading, filling potholes and removing rocks.  As a result, the
application fields themselves have a level to gently sloping topography.

     Features of terrain have some influence on microclimate, including
modification of the wind flow pattern.  Formation of lakes and reser-
voirs resulting from mining activities in the past probably have changed
the amount and distribution of thermal energy at the site.  Availability
of moisture from lake or reservoir evaporation, coupled with nighttime
loss of thermal energy from the ground surface by radiation, may encour-
age formation of ground fogs which limit the mixing ability of the sur-
face air layer.  If fogging persists beyond mid-morning hours or ex-
tends throughout the day, airborne contaminants such as malodorants may
accumulate near the ground or in depressions.

     The capacity of storm runoff to carry suspended solids such as silt
or spoil  fines  may have been increased by the steepened slopes resulting
from coal stripping and piled, abandoned spoil.  This is evidenced by
several spoil downwashes on the project site.  The leveling and grading
accomplished for site preparation should have significantly reduced the
erosion problem.  Site areas not developed as sludge application fields
may continue to erode, causing water  quality problems.  The most signi-
ficant problem is the leachate from unearthed black shale which is high
in soluble minerals  (including cadmium).
                              IV-13

-------
B.    GEOLOGY AND SOILS

     Environmental  impacts such as erosion or groundwater contamination, and
socio-economic factors such as land development potential, will  depend to a
great degree upon the geological and soil  characteristics.  This section con-
tains a discussion of past and present geological  conditions and a descrip-
tion of soil characteristics in the vicinity of Fulton County.

     1.   Geological Characteristics

          The land surface is covered with unconsolidated soil  deposits in
     this general area which nearly obscure the bedrock except near the
     valleys of major drainage channels.   A brief discussion of the bedrock
     and pleistocene stratigraphy is presented in this section,  concluding
     in a description of the characteristics of mine spoils.

          Outcrops of bedrock reveal that the geological  formation consists
     of shales and sandstones, containing several  strata of coal and lime-
     stone beds.  Figure IV-6 shows a typical stratigraphic profile.  A soft
     gray shale known as Canton Shale, approximately 40 to 60 feet thick, lies
     immediately beneath the surface soil  deposits.   This shale is underlain
     by 1 to 2 feet of gray, fossiliferous limestone known as Saint David
     Limestone.  Beneath this stratum are 4 to 6 feet of black shale, which
     merges into a high-quality coal designated as No. 5 or Springfield coal.
     This coal seam has a thickness of 4 1/2 to 5 feet and is located near
     elevation 580.  The relatively shallow depth and high quality of this
     coal has led to considerable strip and shaft mining throughout the gen-
     eral area.  The coal is underlain by soft clay to shale and several other
     thin strata of limestone and shale.   These layers have a total thickness
     of approximately 5"to 8 feet.

          The bedrock surface is covered by a 30 to 50-foot mantle of glacial
     drift or drift-related deposits.  The bottom layer is composed of a silty
     clay to clayey silt matrix resulting from glacial till during the Illinois
     Glacial Era. Illinoisan glacial till  is topped by a windblown silt material
     known as loess, which is approximately 20 to 30 feet thick.  Past coal
                                   IV-14

-------



20-30 ft.


10-20 ft.



40-60 ft.



"1-2 ft

4-6 ft.

4.5-5 ft.

5-8 ft.






























~~_ 	 . ^^_— ~-
	
— — • 	

-_ t _ - -
\ ' ' • '
&>•£
>«>>
'•''>'7=.
=i'.*/
— — -^Sil


~ ~_ "
— —
	 __

_ 	
i i i r i
-^ _j^_r"^



J-L-l I 1
SA^B^WH^M
Mill
^==5=
XK*.* X.
f I I ll
T'T^f-'f
- Surface

Loess



	 Glacial drift and alluvial deposits



Canton Shale



St. David Limestone
Rlark Shalp


	 No. 5 Coal

	 Covel Conglomerate
Hanover Limestone
	 R~\ar\f ^hal
-------
mining operations have modified this stratigraphic profile.   The
uppermost bedrock strata and the unconsolidated sediments have been
removed and remolded into a generally similar but locally variable
soil mass (A&H Engineering Corporation,  1971).

     The characteristics of the  calcareous  mine spoil  material  have
been analyzed and are presented in Table IV-5.   Clay species in  the
clay fraction of the soil were investigated  by the potash content, sur-
face area, and X-ray diffraction patterns of the soil  particles.  Illite
is the dominant mineral and accounts for 54% of the total clay.   Kaolin-
ite was estimated at 27%, chlorite at 8%, arid vermiculite at 11% of the
total.

2.   Soil Characteristics

     A study of the project site to identify areas with basically simi-
lar soil and groundwater characteristics was conducted by L. T.  Hooper
under" subcontract with the A&H Engineering Corporation (Hooper,  1971).
According to Hooper, the project site can be divided into three  basic
areas:

     •    Area 1 — completely strip-mined land
     •    Area 2 -- virgin or placeland  with a cover of loess
          over glacial till
     •    Area 3 -- alluvial land within major stream beds,  affec-
          ted by mining activities.

The spatial distribution of these soil  areas is presented in Figure
IV-7.

     During surface mining operations, the overburden soils  and  cap rock
in Area  1 were removed from the entire area  to obtain coal.   Therefore,
the subsurface of Area 1 consists of a heterogeneous landfill which is
composed'of cohesive fine-grained soils  with pockets and discontinuous
zones of boulder-size rock.  These rearranged and redistributed  over-
burden soils are rather impervious.  Numerous depressions were created,
most  of which have no drainage outlet.  Large lakes maintain a nearly

                              IV-16

-------
  Table IV-5.   Selected Characteristics of the Fulton County
                Calcareous Mine Spoil Material  (MSDGC, 1974)
Spoil material

    pH                                                   7.8
    E.C. ymhos/cm                                        0.46
    1/3 bar water, %                                    26.72
    15 bar water, %                                     12.49
    Cation exchange capacity, meq/100 g                 14.8
    Ammonium fixation capacity, meq/100 g                5.2
    Sand content, %                                      8
    Silt content, %                                     64
    Clay content, %                                     28
Clay fraction only

    Illlte, %                                           54
    Kaolinite, %                                        27
    Chlorite, %                                          8
    Vermiculite, %                                      11

    Surface area, m^/g                                 138
    K20, %                                               4.47
    NaoO, %                                              0.82
    MgO, %                                               2.29
    CaO, %                                               1.15
                              IV-17

-------
OJ


Q.
                   CO

                   1
                                                              s-
                                                              O)
                                                              o.
                                                              o
                                                              o
                                                              O)
                                                              S-
                                                              c:
                                                              o
                                                              t
                                                             4J
                                                              CO

                                                             Q



                                                              ns
                                                              CL
                                                             OO
                                                              
-------
uniform level which is believed to coincide with the groundwater table.
Mining activities have resulted in slightly different features in parts
of Area 1.  A sub-classification of Area 1 and its description can be
found in the Subsurface Investigation and Evaluation - Finaj^ Report
(Hooper, 1971).

     Area 2 is the area in which no strip mining activities have been
undertaken.  Approximately 4 to 8 feet of loess, which is comprised of
50% clay and 50% silt-sized particles, covers the glacial soils.  These
materials are essentially impervious, but are subject to erosion if ex-
posed on slopes steeper than 1:5.  A groundwater table at a depth of
approximately 15 feet is normal throughout the area with the exception
of slopes leading down to stream valleys.  It is known that much of Area
2 has been mined underground by tunneling methods (Hooper, 1971).

     Area 3 consists of alluvial soils within major stream beds, and
defines most of the continuous drainage channels.  These soils are rela-
tively impervious to percolation water, but are moderately permeable to
horizontal flow.  A high groundwater table is normal here.

     Based on field pumping tests, laboratory tests, and analysis of
existing groundwater conditions, the permeability of the overall mass of
mine spoil is estimated to be in the range of 10"^ to 10"^ centimeters
per second (cm/sec).  The vertical permeability of soils was estimated
by laboratory tests to be from 10   to 10"  cm/sec.   According to Casa-
grande's classification of soils by permeability, these soils are imper^
vious, non-draining or poorly draining (Casagrande,  1948).  However,
some zones or layers may consist of broken shale and sandstone slabs or
blocks arranged in a way that provides a rapid path for water, and may
possess a permeability as high as 10   cm/sec (A&H Engineering Corpora-
tion, 1971).

     There are no published Soil Conservation Service soil surveys
available for Fulton County.  However, the Fulton County Soil Conser-
vation Agent at Lewistown provided highly useful  information concern-
ing the agricultural capability of local  soils (see  Section F. 3. of
this chapter).

                              IV-19

-------
C.    HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

     This section describes  the hydrological  and water  quality  characteris-
tics of the project area.  The purposes  of  this review  are  to define local
hydrological patterns,  establish  baseline water quality information, and de-
fine their interrelationships.  Moreover, the background quality  of ground
and surface waters and  their respective  flows will  determine their vulner-
ability to project impacts.

     1.   Surface Water Hydrology

          The project site is located within  the Illinois River basin.   Most
     of the surface water is drained  by  Big Creek and Slug  Run, a branch of
     Big Creek, to Spoon River, a tributary of the  Illinois River.   The  tri-
     butaries associated with the project site, on  a regional scale, are
     shown in Figure IV-8.  The flows of Big  Creek  and  Spoon River have  been
     monitored at three USGS gage stations.   Two stations are located on Big
     Creek at St. David and  near  Bryant, and  the third  on the Spoon River at
     Seville.  The daily average, maximum,  and minimum  discharges at these
     stations in 1972 and 1973 are shown in Table IV-6.  (The detailed drain-
     age pattern near the project site is depicted  in Figure IV-9,  page  IV-24.)
                Table IV-6.    Daily Discharges  at  USGS  Gage
                              Stations (USGS,  1972 and  1973)
                                          1972                     1973
                                  Daily Discharge (cfsT    Daily Discharge (cfs)
                                 Mean  Maximum  Minimum   Mean   Maximum  Minimum
Big Creek at St. David, Illinois
USGS Station 05570350            16.9    137      1.9     39.4     700      7.6
Big Creek near Bryant, Illinois
USGS Station 05570370            28.3    259      6.7     56.4     803     11.0
Spoon River at Seville, Illinois
USGS Station 05570000           625.0   5150     37.0
                                  IV-20

-------
    '0 a*ttMuM
                                                             THE ILLINOIS
                                                             STATE MUSEUM
                                                             DICKSON MOUNDS
                                           WATERFORD I    ^'nyERpoOL BARGE DOCK
                                                                   SPOON RIVER VALLEY
                                                                   SCENIC DRIVE

                                                              	MSD PIPELINE

                                                                   COUNTY HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                                24\  US HIGHWAY MARKER
                                                                •—>

                                                               (9)  STATE HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                                   SPECIAL POINT OF INTEREST



                                                             Him   Project  Area
Figure IM-8.   Illinois River and  Tributories associated with Project Site.
                                     IV-21

-------
     Based on a soil permeability of 10"  cm/sec,as discussed in Sec-
tion IV.B., the vertical infiltration rate ranges from 1.2 x 10"
inches per hour, for a rainfall  intensity of 0.01 inches per hour, to
3.54 x 10~4 inches per hour for an intensity of 3 inches per hour.  The
latter is equivalent to the peak hourly rainfall  from a 24-hour, 100-
year storm.  It is clear that the amount of rainwater infiltrating the
soil surface is relatively insignificant when compared to surface run-
off.  In other words, poor soil  drainage forces rain water to be dis-
charged to creeks  or streams in surface runoff.   Assuming no percola-
tion through the soil and no evapotranspiration by plants, the runoff
volume of a one-acre drainage surface is about:

     •    23,700 cubic feet for a 24-hour, 100-year storm
     •    19,000 cubic feet for a 24-hour, 25-year storm
     •    14,900  cubic feet for a 24-hour, 5-year storm
     •    9,000 cubic feet for a 24-hour, 1-year storm.

Flood hazards are generally confined to the flood plains, which are out-
lined as Area 3 in Figure IV-7 (page IV-18).

2.   Groundwater Hydrology

     Migration or drainage of groundwater is much more difficult to de-
fine than for surface water.  With the aid of well-water elevations and
river water levels, the groundwater flow in the general area has been
interpreted qualitatively.  The water elevations in 22 wells within and
around the project site have been observed monthly by MSDGC personnel.
After some data reduction, all observations are expressed as an average
value, accompanied by its standard deviation and range of variation
throughout the observation periods.  The results are summarized in Table
IV-7.   (All water elevations are based on US6S mean sea level with the
1929 adjustment.)  Utilizing well water and stream water levels, the
pattern of groundwater flow can be established by the "streamline" me-
thod.  The pattern is displayed in Figure IV-9.
                              IV-22

-------




in
ox
01
§
 •(->
c a a
° > -E c,
+J 0) 10 C
« a s» o
OI -O tt- 4J
i— S- o *
-a a) s-
c c en ai
(O us c in
Ol +J (O J3


















r-
CM
3
VO
CM
3
in
CM
3
CM
3
n
CM
3
CM
CM
3
O
CM
OX
3
co
3
3
to
in
3


i

CO OJ O
ro vo ^ ox
r— CM .—
vo
CO OX O
en ^ ^ r^
in
r^ co o
r-- ox in o
•«• CM CM
r~ * o
in CM co »-*
r- CM
vo
CM CM O
i-^ CO O O
O f— CM
vo
*»• ro o
"— i— *r o
r- i—
in
O 1 1
i i
CM r—
in
O I 1
i i
g
vo
O CM r—
CO VO •— Tj-
Sr^ VO t^
O CM CO
CM t— ro m
ro
vo
ro r-. o
in ro CM to
CM >— i—
vo
CO vo O
^ O CM O
to *""
vo" CD C5 «J-
in
to
i i^ ^
+j c c
H- O O
O i— *r-
i- > s- in
*j ai 
-0 0) t-
C C O) 01
rt> jj m ^
Z i/> a; o
IV-23

-------
Deerfietd   ! Joshua
Twnsp     j Twnsp

Cass     ' Pulman
Twnsp     • Twnsp
             Figure  IV-9.   Pattern  of Groundwater  Flow  (MSDGC  1972a through  1975g'
                                                 IV-24

-------
     The interactions between groundwater and surface water systems
cannot be attributed solely to soil percolation or trans-migration be-
cause soils in this area are relatively impermeable.  Therefore, sur-
face water flow is generally derived from upstream tributary flow,
storm runoff, and snow melt.  Paths of rapid flow between ground and
surface waters may furnish the mechanism for groundwater depletion.
Since there are a number of stable surface water impoundments in the
area, it is likely that groundwater replenishes the surface water sys-
tem.

3.   Water Quality

     To assess possible impact on water quality from project opera-
tions, surface and groundwater quality prior to project implementa-
tion must be established.  Using 1971 as the baseline year, stream
water quality at monitoring stations SI, S2, and S3 (see Figure IV-a)
is summarized in Table IV-8.  These measurements must be compared to
standards for the State of Illinois, which are presented in Chapter II.
The 1971 pH values and the chloride (Cl), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr),
manganese (Mn), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) concentrations
were generally in conformance with water quality standards.  Average
concentrations of sulfate ions (SO*), copper (Cu), and lead (Pb) were
within or marginally close to standards.  However, these standards were
violated occasionally, as evidenced by the 1971 maximum concentrations
which were all higher than related standards.  Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N),
iron (Fe), and fecal coliform concentrations violated standards on num-
erous occasions, indicating pollution in Big Creek.

     Stations SI and S2 on Big Creek constitute an upstream-downstream
pair relative to the project site.  The water quality at upstream station
SI might be affected to some extent by the treated sewage effluent from
the Canton sewage treatment plant.  Generally, the stream at stations!
was lower in quality than at the downstream stations2 with respect to
Cl, S04> NH,-N, Cu, and fecal coliforms.  This indicates that cleansing
and dilution occurred along the approximately 6.5-mile stream reach
                              IV-25

-------
Table IV-8.   Surface Water Quality  in  1971  (MSDGC,  1971)
Parameter
and Unit

pH


cr
(mg/1)
_?
SO/
(mg/i )

NH^-N
(mg/i)

Cd
(mg/D

Cu
(mg/1)

Cr
(rng/1 )
Monitoring Station

mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
SI
7.9
8.8
7.3
53
120
24
389
1,250
120
2.6
8.1
0.3
0
0
0
0.02
0.13
0
0
0.18
0
S2
8.1
8.7
7.1
28
72
4
381
879
80
1.8
6.6
0.1
0
0.06
0
0.02
0.06
0
0.02
0.28
0
S3
8.0
8.3
7.5
10
15
6
606
743
424
0.4
0.7
0.1
0
0.04
0
0.01
0.03
0
0.02
0.12
0
Parameter
and Unit

Fe
(mg/1)

Pb
(mg/1)

Mn
(mg/1)

Hg
(mg/1)

Ni
(mg/1)

Zn
(mg/1)
Fecal
Col i forms
(1/100 ml)
Monitoring Station

mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
mean
max.
min.
SI
1.5
4.8
0
0.05
0.2
0
0.7
0.98
0.06
0.05
0.2
0
0
0.35
0
0
0.2
0
7,500
34,000
270
S2
1.3
4.5
0.1
0.09
0.28
0
0.86
1.31
0.60
0
0.2
0
0
0.33
0
0
0.2
0
1,700
3,800
20
S3
0.3
0.6
0.1
0.08
0.2
0
0.47
0.96
0.24
0.2
0.6
0
0
0.31
0
0
0
0
920
4,000
80
                          IV-26

-------
between the two stations.  Levels of cadmium, iron, nickel, and zinc
remained relatively constant at both stations.  Surface runoff and
leachates originating in the strip-mined area along this segment of
Big Creek might be the cause of increased levels of chromium, lead
and manganese in the downstream direction.  However, lack of detailed
data prevents the specific identification of the source.

     Groundwater samples were collected from a number of wells and one
spring (see Figure IV-9, page IV-24).The measured ranges of all groundwater
quality parameters reported in 1971 and 1972, prior to project operation, are
presented in Table IV-9.  In this table, the well responsible for the
maximum reading of a given parameter is designated by parentheses..
Wells W2, W4, W9, Wll, W12, and W13 indicated high degrees of contamina-. :
tion.  Variations in concentrations of nitrite and nitrate nitrogen
(NCL+NOo-N) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3~N) at all monitoring stations are
summarized in Table IV-10 for 1972.

     In earlier years the U.S. Department of the Interior conducted a
survey of water quality from wells and infiltration galleries in more
than 17 study areas throughout the United States.  The range in quality
of groundwater used for water supply is summarized in Table IV-9 (Durfer
and Becker, 1965).  Comparison of the baseline groundwater quality in the
project area with that from the Department of the Interior study indicates
that concentrations of Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, and Ni in the project area were
within the range found elsewhere in the United States; the ranges of pH
and zinc concentration were close to the national values.  Concentrations
of Cl, SO,, Ca, Mg and Na were higher than those found nationwide, indi-
cating that dissolved solids or salt concentrations were relatively high
in the project area.

     The U.S. recommended maximum level of nitrite and nitrate nitrogen
for drinking water is 10 mg/1 as nitrogen (U.S. Department of Public Health
Service, 1962 and 1969).  If all ammonia nitrogen were oxidized to nitrite
or nitrate, the range of nitrite and nitrate nitrogen concentrations in
the project area would fall between zero and 5.21 mg/1.  This range falls
within the lower one-third of the national range of 0 to 17 mg/1  as reported
by Durfer and Becker (1965).   The maximum nitrite and nitrate concentration

                              IV-27

-------
         Table  IV-9.   Range of Various Water Quality Parameters  in  Well  Water,
                      1971 and 1972; and U.S.  Averages  (MSDGC,  1972a  through
                      1975g; Durfer and Becker,  1965)
                                                                       Water  Used
Parameter
and Unit
pH
Total P
Cl"
so4 =
Alkalinity
(CaC03)
Conduc-
tivity
Al
Ca
Cd
Cr
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Ni
K
Na
Zn

mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
limho
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
rog/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/ml
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
1971
6.6-9.0
0.6.0 (W9)
2-500 (W4)
1-500 (W4)
4-1,650 (Wll)
90-1,050 (W17)
--
33-495 (W12)
0-0.1 (W6)
0-0.39 (W6)
0-0.5 (W2)
0-118.7 (W9)
0-1.0 (W19)
21-390 (W12)
0-12.7 (W9)
0-20 (W19)
0-0.42 (W10)
0.1-24.9 (W4)
11.7-310 (W8)
0-390 (W12)
1972
6.5-9.2
0 - 0.054 (W2)
2-488 (W4)
3-1,812 (W14)
100-1,000 (Wll)
200-4,000 (W4)
—
38.5-883 (Wl)
0-0.22 (W2)
0-0.05 (W13; W18)
0-1.82 (W2)
0-182.6 (W13)
0-2.2 (W2)
23 - 410 (W14)
0-3.3 (W12)
0-2.8 (W7)
0-0.3
0-19.4 (W4)
7-646 (Wll)
0-140 (W10)
for Water Supply
(U.S. average)
6.7-8.7
--
2.0-92
0.8-572
--
108-1,660
2.9-83
3.2-121
--
ND-1.1
<0.8-15
1.1-6,600
ND-38
0.3-120
ND-340
--
ND-<15
0.4-30
6.1-129
ND-<470
Fecal
Coliforms  1/100 ml
NO = not detected.
O-OOO
0-120 (W7)
                                       IV-28

-------
Table IV-10.    Levels of Nitrite and Nitrate  Nitrogen  and
               Ammonia Nitrogen in Well  Waters  in  1972
               (MSDGC, 1972a through 1975g)
Well
Wl
W2
W4
W5
W7
W8
W9
W10
Wll
W12
W13
W14
W15
W17
W18
W19
N02
Mean
0.03
0.03
0.29
0.04
0.16
0.01
0.02
0.02
0
0.03
0.08
0.01
0.06
0.81
0.03
0.03
+N03-N (mg
Max.
0.11
0.11
1.51
0.27
0.28
0.05
0.09
0.09
0.02
0.13
0.21
0.07
0.28
2.50
0.11
0.13
/I)
Min.
0
0
0
0
0.04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NH
Mean
0.40
0.80
1.1
0.2
0.5
1.8
1.0
0.8
1.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.5
1.8
0.99
3-N (mg/1)
Max.
0.70
4.10
1.9
0.6
1.1
4.3
1.7
1.6
2.1
1.3
0.8
1.3
1.9
2.2
2.7
2.0

Min.
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0
0.4
1.4
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.1
1.3
0.0
                        IV-29

-------
of 5.21 mg/1, recorded at well  W4 in the community of Cuba,  was well
within the recommended drinking water standard.   Apparently, the base-
line quality of groundwater in the area of the project,  was  compatible
with use for public water supply.  However, the high overall concentra-
tion of dissolved minerals, approximately three times the U.S.  standard
of 500 ppm, could necessitate extensive treatment.
                             IV-30

-------
D.   BIOLOGY AND ECOSYSTEMS

     The following discussion of biology and ecosystems is divided into
two sections:  fish and wildlife, and natural vegetation.   Within each of
these are discussed major species, both past and present,  and the rare and
endangered species possibly inhabiting the project area.

     1.   Fish and Wildlife

          Fish abound in most of the local lakes, and are the most numer-
     ous vertebrates in the study area.  The predominant fish are bluegill,
     green and redear sunfish, black crappie, yellow and black bullheads,
     large-mouth bass, and catfish.

          A great diversity of wildlife currently inhabits the project area.
     Turtles, frogs, water insects, and crustaceans are abundant in Lake
     Evelyn.  There are also some black snakes and signs of beaver activity.
     The steep-sided lakes formed by strip mining have fewer_crustaceans and
     water insects, but muskrats and frogs are abundant.  Land animals include
     deer, fox, raccoon, skunk, opossum, rabbit, coyote, badger, groundhog,
     and weasel.  Water fowl include ducks, geese (especially the giant Canada
     goose), swans and an occasional great blue heron.  Other birds include
     crows, hawks, warblers, robins, starlings, sparrows,  red-winged black-
     birds, bluejays, and finches.

          Within historic times, other animals have populated Fulton County.
     These prairie animals included populations of elk, buffalo, trumpeter
     swans, sandhill cranes, and the prairie chicken, as well as large preda-
     tors like the cougar, bear, and wolf.  Big Bluestem,  a project aimed at
     recreating a native prairie on part of the MSDGC property (the 2,972-acre
     former Gale property, see Figure IV-13, page IV-60),  is planning to cre-
     ate habitat opportunities for a number of original prairie animals.

          Six rare and endangered animal species are listed for the region
     containing Illinois.  Fish species are the longjaw cisco and the blue
     pike.  Endangered birds are the arctic peregrine falcon and Kirtland's
     warbler, and mammals are the Indiana bat and the eastern timber wolf.

                                   IV-31

-------
However, the probability of any of these species being present in the
project area is extremely remote,  and should therefore not present a
problem (Smith, 1976, personal  communication).
2.   Natural Vegetation

     The two types of vegetation in the project area consist of culti-
vated monocultures (predominately corn) in the sludge application fields,
and the area's natural vegetation.   The following is a discussion of this
natural vegetation and the locally rare and endangered plant species
which might occur.

     The predominant grasses are brome, alfalfa, and reed canary grass.
Trees are those generally propagated by wind-blown seeds, including elm,
cottonwood, and willow.

     Most of the lakes in the project area were formed from the end cuts
of strip mining operations, and have steeply sloping sides and a small
littoral zone.  This., zone supports some growth of Chara and Mi tell a.  Dia-
toms are the predominant planktonic species.  No cattails or reeds are
present.

     A few lakes have gently sloping sides and a relatively large lit-
toral zone.  These 'Jakes have an abundance of lake cattails and reeds.
Diatoms and lesser amounts of green algae are the major planktonic spe-
cies.  Submerged aquatic vegetation includes stoneworts, Chara, Nitella,
Elodea, Vallesenana, and some of the Potomegetons.  Considerable num-
bers of currant, raspberry, and blackberry bushes grow along the banks.

     There  are three endangered plant species which probably exist  in the
project area.  (Federal Register, July 1, 1975.)  One, an endangered wood-
land species,  is Aster chasei, a woodland aster.  Two endangered prairie
species are Lespedeza  leptostachya, a bush clover found on dry prairie,
and  Petalostemum  foliosum,  a  prairie clover found near riverbanks.
                              IV-32

-------
E.   POPULATION AND ECONOMICS

     This section is a description and interpretation of the baseline data
needed for the assessment of the socio-economic and land use impacts of the
project.   What is presented here is a selective representation of a broad
data collection effort and contains only those data which are relevant to
the prediction of impacts.  The two main topics discussed in the_section are
demographic and economic characteristics.

     1.    Demographic Characteristics

          Population will be a major factor in determining the types of land
     use  for which there will be a demand  in the project area.   The follow-
     ing  paragraphs discuss historic and present demographic trends in Ful-
     ton  County, and give population projections developed from analysis of
     trends.  The section concludes with a discussion of family income in
     the  county.

          a.   Population trends - Table IV-11 shows  historic  population
          trends in Fulton County.  The county's population decreased from
          approximately 50,000 persons in  1910 to about 42,000 in 1970.
          Slight increases in the populations  of Canton, Lewistown and Farm-
          ington slowed the decline in total population to 6.1% between 1940
          and 1970.   However, an increase  from 41,900 in April  1970 to 42,400
          in July 1974 indicates that past declines may be reversed by new
          factors which could lead to future population growth.   The general
          demographic trend prior to 1970  was  one of  declining rural  popula-
          tion,  only partially balanced by increase in local town populations.
          Approximately 80% of the population  was rural  in 1910,  declining to
          less than 30% in 1970 (U.S.  Bureau of the Census, 1930  to  1970;  Enviro
          Control, Inc., 1975).   Rural population  decrease has been  caused  largely
          by national  decline in the labor intensiveness of farm  production.

               Township population data (1960-1970) show that  growth is  occur-
          ring along a corridor of townships which  cross the county from Can-
          ton.and Orion Townships on the east  to Vermont Township on the west
                                  IV-33

-------
Table IV-11.   Historical Population Trends in
              Fulton County (U.S.  Census of Popu-
              lation)
Township
Astoria
Banner
Bernadotte
Buckhsart
Canton
Cass
Deerfield
Ellisvine
Fairview
Farmers
Farming ton
Harris
Isabel .
Joshua
Kerton
Lee
Lewis town
Liverpool
Orion
Pleasant
Putman
Union
Vermont
Waterford
Woodland
Young Hickory
Community
Astoria
Bryant
St. David
Canton
Norris
Smithfield
Ellisville
Fairview
Table Grove
Fanning ton
Marietta
Lewis town
Ipava
Cuba
Avon
Vermont
London Mills
Banner
Dunfermline
Liverpool
Land Area
36.6
33.7
37.7
35.1
35.7
38.7
34.8
13.8
36.4
35.7
36.2
33.8
29.5
35.8
27.3
37.2
35.7
42.2
36.5
37.9
34.8
36.7
36.7
21.3
38.7
24.3





















1970
1,738
694
333
1,770
15,837
819
424
230
923
498
3,998
520
300
641
178
404
3,252
844
898
1,018
2,115
1 ,387
1,399
233
596
869

1,281
326
773
14,217
359
318
137
601
469
2,959
169
2,706
608
1,581
1,013
947
612
235
282
218
1960
1,781
739
362
1,974
15,030
835
476
280
921
561
4,052
589
348
707
195
475
3,163
932
776
1,128
1,791
1,443
1,423
266
700
957

1,205
346
862
13,588
307
329
140
544
400
2,831
201
2,603
623
1,380
996
903
_
247
284
184
1950
1,976
756
369
2,257
15,056
948
528
319
1,029
617
3,950
680
387
813
283
496
3,237
1,057
789
1,199
2,025
1,340
1,490
346
843
906

1,303
395
812
11,927
319
355
157
568
481
2,651
178
2,630
667
1,482
870
940
_
215
292
"•
1940
1,953
690
671
2,320
14,152
1,018
580
423
1,065
S67
3,937
903
507
857
370
594
2,943
1,071
900
1,299
2,169
1,370
1,590
352
976
940

1,292
387
859
11,577
339
359
216
528
480
2,225
193
2,335
629
1,620
803
945
_
172
-
••
1930
1,997
617
643
2,589
13,937
937
630
331
1,113
976
3,941
813
460
874
338
627
2,834
955
781
1,333
2,123
1,355
1,602
303
976
798

1,189
442
977
11,718
329
315
164
522
463
2,269
202
2,249
635
1,479
799
948
432
_
_
—
                    IV-34

-------
(see Figure IV-10).  On both sides of this corridor, township
population is declining.  It is noteworthy that these declining
areas are largely agricultural.  The heavily strip-mined town-
ships of Putman, Canton and Orion show significant population
increase.  Thus, in terms of population growth, economic devel-
opment tends to coincide with mining activities.  During this same
period the communities of the county showed a pattern of popula-
tion change consisting of three components:
          Major communities (Canton, Cuba, Lewistown, and
          Farraington) increased significantly
          Communities in the predominantly agricultural  western
          part of the county (Ellisville, Ipava, Marietta, and
          Smithfield) declined
          Other communities grew slowly
The growth of major communities is presumably related to improved
accessibility and a correspondingly increased radius of commercial
center trade, combined with an increase in service activities.   The
decline of the western communities is presumably due to a decline
in agricultural labor.  Population decrease in small communities
south of Canton is interpreted as representing a combination of
decline in agricultural labor and bituminous coal mining, and
increased attractiveness of growing urban centers nearby.

b.   Population projections - Future population growth is predic-
ted in the two most recent projections describing Fulton County
and its surrounding water resources sub-region.  The 1972-E OBERS
Projections predict a 43% population increase between 1970 and  2020
for the 29-county water resources sub-area containing Fulton County.
The basis given is the expected expansion of manufacturing.  In-
creased opportunities in industry would facilitate the maintenance
of the existing population, and would encourage population in-migra-
tion to the areas near new industrial  plants.  Consistent with  the
1972-E OBERS Projections are population projections for Fulton  County
                         IV-35

-------
                  Township Population  Change,  Plus  (+)  or Minus  (-)
ure IV-10.    Fulton  County  Township Population Change, 1960-1970 (U.S. Census of Population)
                                        IV-36

-------
 whichhave been  released  recently  by  the  State  of  Illinois  (see
 Table  IV-12  below).   These  1975 projections  by the  Bureau  of  the
 Budget,  State of  Illinois,  predict a 29% increase in  Fulton County's
 population between  1970  and 2020.
Table   IV-12.    Population Projections for Fulton County
                 (Illinois Population  Projections, 1975)
1970
Census
41 ,883
1975
41,308
1980
42,031
1985
43,196
1990
44,691
2000
49,454
2020
54,048
 c.    Family income - Median family income in Fulton County is  rela-
 tively high when compared to other predominantly rural  counties
 (Griffin and Chicoine,  1974).  Principal  causes for higher income
 are the availability of nearby manufacturing employment and historic
 labor-intensive modes of agricultural  and strip-mine production.
 Much of the manufacturing employment pays high union wages. Many
 other, less well paid members of the work force are able to supple-
 ment their income by working shifts at the factories.  Fewer people
 work on farms or at strip mines at present, but the skills required
 to operate increasingly sophisticated equipment enable them to com-
 mand higher salaries.

      Table IV-13 shows that the median family income has been  in-
 creasing at approximately the same rate in Fulton County as in the
 entire country.
                      IV-37

-------
     Table IV-13.
Trends in Median Family Income (in 1967 dollars)
(County and City Data Book. 1972, 1967, 1956;
Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1974)

Fulton County
United States
1949
4235
4603
1959
5981
6334
1969
7852
8486
2.    Economic Characteristics

     A number of local economic conditions will  influence the overall
impacts of the project.  These conditions are described in the follow-
ing section in terms of historic trends and current and probable future condi'
tions.  The analysis is divided into two major topics.   The first con-
sists of employment and governmental  finances including land values in
relation to tax base.  These factors create a framework for an ensuing
description of the agricultural, mining and manufacturing and the retail
and wholesale trade sectors of the local economy which  is the second
topic.

     a.   Employment and fiscal trends - Table IV-14 summarizes a de-
     tailed history of employment trends in Fulton County.  Several gen-
     eral trends are apparent in these data.  Large declines in employ-
     ment have occurred in the agricultural and mining  sectors; little
     change has occurred in services and wholesale trade; manufacturing
     has fluctuated; and slight increases have occurred in retail trade.

          Historical trends in revenues, expenditures,  and public debts
     are shown for Fulton County in Table -IV-15.   These trends
     document a history of limited local financial resources.
                              IV-38

-------
Table IV-14.  Employment Structure in Fulton County, Illinois
              (U.S. Census, County Business Patterns and Census
              of Government)

Agriculture
1
Manufacturing 2,
Trade- Retail 1,
Trade-Wholesale
Services
Mining 1,
Contract Construction
Forestry & Other

Government^
Education3
Total
(Teachers)
1950
4302
953
601
726
276
467
268
133
7
1957
1,317

390



1959
919
612
185
195
--
265
20





1959
3842
1964
2,683
1,715
180
828
837
134
10
1962
1,359

295
(229)
1964
3922
1967
3,605
1,898
227
1,024
1,004
127

1967
2,177
-
505
(375)
1969
1231
1972
2,551
2,004
221
1,273
699
192

1972
1,913

955
(673)
1
 For Class 1-5 farms for worker by number of days worked -- 150 days or
 more.
 "Workers by number of days worked — 150 days or more.


 Local government employment and payroll in individual city areas.
                               IV-39

-------
   Table IV-1 5.   Trends in Governmental  Finances in
                  Fulton County, Illinois (U.S. Census of
                  Governments)


Year
1972
1967
1962
Total
General
Revenues
(millions)
$16.6
$10.9
$ 7.9

Total
Expenditures
(millions)
$16.4
$10.8
$ 7.6

General Debt
Outstanding
(millions)
$9.3
$7.6
$5.5
Because local  public financial  resources are heavily dependent on
the property tax base,  trends in land values are a useful  indica-
tor.  The total  value of real estate in Fulton County has  de-
clined significantly since 1971.  As shown in Table IV-16, Banner
Township is the  only township in which there was a reversal  of
this erosion of  tax base.   This significant reversal was caused by
the construction of a massive CILCO power plant in the mid-eastern
portion of the county.

b.   Agricultural activity - The agricultural sector of Fulton
County's economy is in  a state of rapid change.  Data in Table
IV-17 are descriptive of numerous agricultural  trends which  have
developed since  1940.  Discussion of these trends sets a frame-
work for an analysis of future agricultural  influences on  the lo-
cal economy.

     Local agricultural trends appear to reflect a number  of na-
tional patterns.  Complicated,  expensive farm machinery has  made
farming less labor intensive and has necessitated increases  in the
size of farms  and the amount of skill  required of the farmer.  In-
creases in both  farm size and required capital  investment  have tended
                         IV-40

-------
      Table  IV-16.
Trends in the Total  Value of Real Estate in
Fulton County (Fulton County Assessor's Record,
1963,  1971,  1975)
Township

Astoria
Banner
Bernadotte
Buckheart
Canton
Cass
Deerfield
Ellisville
Fairview
Farmers
Farming ton
Harris
Isabel
Joshua
i'erton
Lee
Lewis town
Liverpool
Orion
Pleasant
Putman
Union
Vermont
Uaterford
Woodland
Young Hickory
Total
1963
10,351,140
6,759,298
4,322,675
11,656,337
69,792,894
6,394,912
5,222,632
2,321,338
12,421,754
6,593,026
22,698,552
4,096,206
4,481,162
10,064,144
3,467,412
6,855,263
16,809,122
7,656,009
5,873,750
8,948,596
12,016,250
11,408,048
10,137,653
3,088,179
5,479,451
5,614,079
Total
100% Value 274,579,880
Value in 1967
1971
13,082,442
5,769,688
5,098,330
11,758,275
66,997,284
5,948,055
5,359,248
2,033,798
12,336,954
6,410,532
22,177,412
3,846,349
5,083,303
8,814,147
3,784,055
7,165,266
16,767,504
8,375,394
6,657,339
8,173,083
16,230,825
10,946,513
9,380,073
3,651,945
6,266,587
5,179,798

277,294,180
Dollars
1975
9,740,176
13,735,906
4,049,181
9,851,977
55,167,531
4,737,494
4,277,267
1,673,854
9,176,247
5,026,814
16,851,133
3,036,348
3,990,668-
6,852,317
2,983,249
5,817,557
14,974,874
7,262,166
5,743,451
6,378,639
14,997,607
8,534,761
7,214,698
3,018,174
4,959,408
4,153,060

233,965,520
Note: Two sets of figures were used  to  calculate  values.  These  are the
      percentage of assessed value and  a deflator based on  Illinois
      farmland values.  Values for these are  as follows:
      Percent of value  assessed
                  Deflator  used
                J96_3
                 60^
                .76
J_971
 50;;
1.09
19_75
 38%
2.09
                              IV-41

-------
CO
^
3
 O
 s-
 CD
 o

 to

 i/i
 c
 &
oo



cn
to
cn
^—





cn
LO
cn
r—






o
LO
cn
1

CM ^3" O r-- O OO «C ' —
r-- i— • • en CM z i—
1 — OO CM CM CO OO OO
i— <* CM LO i—
to
«^J-



^r^r^uToto
i — CM • • Z CM CO r~-
oo «* «*• co cn to i —
CM to CM i—
cn
^j-




ocncMtoeCi— CMI—
CO i— • • Z CM «d" CO
r-. cn cn i-- to oo i—
CM cn i— CM
CO



CO
LO
o
cn
CM
LO
•t
CO
oo
oo
CO
to
o
^"
r—
•s
LO
CM
W
00
CM
O
CO
CTl
**
cn
1 —
OO CM «*• O
CO CO 00 00
o ^i- oo oo
CM cn LO
O CM *d"
CO r— r—



CO tO OO LO
CM CM cn to
cn •— co oo
OO •* CO
cn to ^f
CM r— i—




<* CO i— i—
cn r— CM «*
co in ^t
i— CO CO
tO CO CM
CM r— i—


CO CM
r-.. o
LO 00
CM tO
I— LO




LO r- r—
cn r^ LO
r^ O ^i~
r~-. cn cn
CM i— CO





co co r~-
r*^ ^t~ co
to oo o
LO CO r—
«3- r— oo



*i- CM CM O
r*~ o oo r^.
to cn co r~-
LO o en
LO CM LO
r—



oo CM en «*
oo o to o
cn o to to
i — *3- «^J- LO
IO O CM
CM i—




IO CO CM O
OO LO CO CO
co en en cn
r^ cn r— r^.
<- to co
•— <—


LO
CO

oo
CO

•N
r—
CO

to
CO
CO
CM
LO
rt
to
CM
•*/=>•
O
cn
LO
to
CM
00
oo
CM
 o
o
 c
 o
             LO
             ^d"
             cn
                   CMCOCMLO-ooi—
                     *  •* to co   •*  *
                   CM en i—    o CM
                      co       i—
to
to
cn
CO
cn
o
oo
r—
^J-
to
cn
cn
to
CM


cn
CM
' —
cn
CO



•— co
CM ^t"
to
CM
oo
•—


^~
to
CM
cn
CM



CO
«*
oo
CO
r—



oo
CO
r**
to
^~



cn
o
• —
^j-
LO



CM
to
r-.
r—
r—



cn
CM
CM
CM
CM
•—


OO
^~
to
CM
LO
CM


LO
  o
to
r-  rO
3  S- S-
O. CU O CU
O  0.3 CU
Q- O    •<->

E  E eu cu
s_  s_ s- to
ro  ro •*" *"i
                                                  o
                                                 OO
                                                 U
                                                 3
                                                 T3
                                                 O


                                                 Q.
                                                 4-
                                                  O
                                                  CU
                                                  3
                                                  ro
                                 LO
                                 CO
                                 to
                                 LO
                                 CM
      LO OO *3- CM IO
      CO tO CO OO i—
      cn    oo co en
             cn LO oo i-^
             co cn LO to
             r-.oor~.cn
      to
      o
LO CO •*
OO CO CM
• CM cn cn
• r— r*^ o
        CM
to

to

CM
                                                          CM
                                                        (ft O
                                                        CU ro
                                                        O
                                                        ro
                                                                           to
                                                                           cn
                                                                                                   to
                                                            (O
                                           to
                                           CU
 c  o>
 tO  i.
i—  3 to ro  to  ro ro
       CU -—' CU  CU
    to s-     s- jc
    ro O to  O
                                                        O Q-  ro
                                                                     ro
                                                        rO ro  c  CT> to
                                                        +J 4J  S_  i.  -t->
                                                        O O  O  O  rO
                                                        1— H- O 00  O 2 00

CO
S-
o
ro

to
C
ro
CU
o
>>
0
OO
to
CU
ro (/)
O cn
T3 -O Q-
C CO
ro ^ "O to
r— C C
CO T- rO CU
r— 3~ NX
-M t/1 O
-i-> 2 cn-r-
(0 O O -C
<_3 O IE O
U
-o
0
S-
CL.

M-
0

CU
3
f—
ro
>•
                                                                                          a.

                                                                                          "cu
                                                                                                                "O
                                                                                                                 0)
                                                                                                                 i-
                                                                                                                 eu
                                                                                                                 to
                                                                                                                 3

                                                                                                                 cu
                                                                                 O
                                                                                 Q.
                                                                                 CO
                                                                                 S-

                                                                                 to

                                                                                 S-
                                                                                      eu
                                                                                     r—
                                                                                      ro
                                                                                      i/l

                                                                                     O
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     LO
                                                                                               c:
                                                                                               r$
                                                                                               -C
                                                                                                                       i-
                                                                                                                       a>
                                                                                      to
                                                                                      eu
                                                                                                                       CD
                                                                                                                      to
                                                                                                                       (O
                                                                                                                      LO

                                                                                                                       I
                                                                                                                       to
                                                                                                                       to
                                                          CU   O

                                                               S-
                                                               o
                                                                                                                  3
                                                                                                               i—  CM
                                                                IV-42

-------
          to  increase  corporate  ownership  of  farms  and  the  number  of  farm
          operators  living  in  town,   The consolidation  of older, smaller
          farms  has  led  to  decline  in farm population,  and  smaller farms
          which  remain are  not large  enough to  support  the  families living
          on  them.   Hence,  an  increasing number of  these farmers have second
          jobs,  which  are generally shift  work  at factories  in  Peoria and
          Fulton Counties.

              A number  of  trends are apparent  concerning the type of farm
          goods  being  produced.  Of great  importance  is the  fact, that the
          total  value  (in constant  dollars) of  all  farm products has  under-
          gone substantial  increase,  despite  a  slight loss  in the  total acre*
          age of farms.   Decreases  in the  production  of dairy products,, poul-
          try and wheat  have been balanced by increases in  the  production of
          corn,  soybeans and beef.

          c.   Mining  and manufacturing  -  Strip mining  of coal  has been a major
          influence  on the  economy  of Fulton  County.  Economic  trends in min-
          ing are presented in Table  IV-18 showing that the total  number of
          employees  has  fluctuated, but  has generally decreased since 1954.
          This decrease  reflects technological  improvement  in the  coal ex-
          traction process  which make it a more capital intensive  industry.
         Table  IV-18.    Economic Trends  in Mining  in  Fulton County,  Illinois
                         (U.S.  Census  of  Mineral  Industries)

Total

Establ

ishments
1954
25
1958
15
1963
16
1

967
10
1

972
12
 Types  of  Establishments
   Bituminous                     24            12            14       8         6
   Sand &  Gravel                   1             2             125
   *0ther                         —             1             1       --         1
 Total  Employees               1,025          805           984       —       600
 Value  of  Shipments          $23,937,000   $19,506,000   $28,229,000   —   $28,600,000
 Value  of  Shipments  (1967)   $27,336,054   $20,617,842   $29,866,282   —  $24,024,000

* Includes chemical  and fertilizer minerals, coal  mining services,  and oil  and  gas
  extraction.
                                  IV-43

-------
The countywide total  number of strip mining companies has also
decreased, resulting  primarily from the economies of scale gained
by merging the resources of two or more firms.   Value of shipments,
a measure of total productivity, has declined in total  dollar value
since 1963.   This decline may reflect the influence of increasingly
stringent national air pollution regulations on  the value of high-
sulfur coal, such as  the coal extracted locally.

     Manufacturing in and near Canton is dominated by the Interna-
tional Harvester plant.   However,  manufacturing plants west and
south of Peoria exert considerable influence on employment in the
Canton area.  As shown in Table IV-19, there are no clearly discern-
able manufacturing trends.   Importantly, though, the data show that
there are few firms employing over 100 people.   Other, smaller firms
form a fairly diverse, although not strong, industrial  base.   Accord-
ing to the 1972-E OBERS Projections, the total  value of manufactur-
ing output in the sub-region containing Fulton  County is expected
to increase by 218% between 1980 and 2020.   This projected increase
could replace job losses resulting from expected decline in the em-
ployment on farms, in mines and in small town retail trade and ser-
vices.

d.   Retaj_1 and wholesale trade -  Historically, most trade activi-
ties have been consolidated in a small number of central places.
Canton is the major urban area in  Fulton County, but trade activi-
ties have also been attracted to Lewistown and  Farmington.  Peoria
and Pekin, however, are the dominant centers of trade in the entire
Region.

     Trends in retail activities are shown in Table IV-20.  The most
important trend is the high rate of increase in the total volume of
retail sales.  The current status  of Canton as  a central marketplace
is demonstrated by a recent survey which shows  that 84% of the in-
habitants of Canton do more than half of their  shopping  in Canton
(Canton  Chamber of Commerce,  1975).   There  appears  to  be progressively
                         IV-44

-------
       Table IV-19.    Historical  Manufacturing  Trends  in  Fulton  County,  Illinois
                      (U.S.  Census  of Manufactures)
I.      Selected Data                              1939     1947     1954     1963     1972

           Number of Establishments                   21       30       30       29      26
           Total  Employees                         1,007    3,178    2,065    2,617

II.     Number of Establishments  by Type

  SIC* Category                                      1947     1954     1963     1972

  20       Food and kindred products                     8753
  23       Apparel  and related products                  2211
  24       Lumber and products except furniture
  25       Furniture and fixtures                        2      1       --      1
  27       Printing and publishing                      8      8      10      7
  28       Chemicals and allied  products                 1      1
  31       Leather and leather products                  3
  32       Stone, clay and  glass products                —      241
  33       Primary metal industries                      2      --       1      1
  34       Fabricated metal products                     1211
  35       Machinery (except electrical)                 2      1        1      4
  36       Electrical machinery                          —      —       1      1
  37       Transportation equipment                      --               1      1
  38       Instruments and related products              1      1
  CAO      Central  Administrative  Offices                --      --      —      1

III.   Industries (Establishments) Employing 100 or More

  SIC* Category                                      1947     1954     1963     1972

  23       Apparel  and related products                  --               1      1
  33       Primary metal industries                      —      --       1
  35       Machinery (except electrical)                 1111
  37       Transportation equipment                      --      --      --      1

  *
   SIC: Standard Industrial Classification,  a code of industrial classifications
        issued by the U.S.  Office  of  Management and Budget
                                         IV-45

-------
            Table  IV-20.  Trends  in Retail Trade in Fulton County, Illinois
                         (U.S. Census of Business; Census of Retail Trade)
I.       Selected  Data  --  Number  of  Establishments

  SIC*  Major Groups                       1948    1954    1958    1963    1967    1972

  52       Lumber,  building  materials,
             hardware                          27      60      67      48       50       34
  54       Food  stores                        54      87      89      81       55       47
  55       Automotive  dealers, except  554      42      47      40      42       42       38
  554      Gasoline service  stations           86      83      80      63       66       63
  56       Apparel  & accessories stores        25      29      24      31       28       28
  57       Furniture,  home furnishings,
             equipment                        32      36      33      36       24       20
  58       Eating & drinking places          121      105      113      97       92       97
  591       Drug  stores &  proprietary
             stores                           19      21      16      12       15       15

II.     Retail Trade Volume  in Thousands of  1967 Dollars

  SIC*  Category                           1948    1954    1958    1963    1967    1972

  52       Lumber,  building  materials,
             hardware                      7,217   7,061   6,484   5,609   9,212   4,046
  54       Food  stores                    12,841   12,184   12,963   13,609   15,453   16,269
  55       Automotive  dealers, ex-
             cept 554                      8,561   13,066   11,039   12,611   13,059   14,823
  554      Gasoline service  stations       3,744   4,501   5,305   4,516   5,551   5,472
  56       Apparel  & accessories
             stores                               2,239   1,910   2,845   3,281   3,794
  57       Furniture,  home furnishings
             & equipment                   2,467   2,829   2,220   1,613   1,977   2,783
  58       Eating 8. drinking places       3,495   3,276   3,567   3,684   3,970   5,003
  591       Drug stores &  proprietary
             stores                       1,318   1,391   1,388   1,574   1,758   2,075

        Total Retail Trade Volume         47,632   54,370   56,557   59,960   67,543   63,338

        Deflators (Consumer  Price Index)   1.387   1.242   1.155   1.058   1.000   0.799

  *
   SIC:  Standard  Industrial  Classification, a  code of industrial classifications
        issued by the  U.S. Office of Management and Budget
                                        IV-46

-------
 less  retail  orientation in  Canton to  the Peoria and  Pekin markets.
 However, specialized goods  such as  bricks,  sports car equipment,
 and  furs are available only in Peoria or Pekin.  Peoria is a  locus
 for  specialized commodities and services as  well as  for comparison
 shopping.

       The number of  wholesale establishments  and the  total volume
 of wholesale sales  have each increased substantially since 1948
 (Table IV-21).   These trends further  reflect less orientation  to-
 ward  the Peoria market.  However, Peoria offers a great diversity
 of wholesale firms,  most of which have larger inventories.
        Table IV-21   Trends in Wholesale Trade in Fulton County, Illinois
                    (U.S. Census of Business; 1972 Census of Wholesale Trade)
                                 1948    1954    1958    1963   1967    1972
I.     Selected Data
        Number of Establishments       47      55     51     51      52     77
        Number of Employees          244     228    239    195     229    380
        Sales in Thousands of
          1967 Dollars            16,696  16,301  19,950  19,295  20,761  33,401
II.    Types of Establishments
        Number of Merchant
          Wholesalers                14      13     19     15      14     59
        Number of Other Operating
          Types*                    33      42     32     36      38     18
Note:  Data on  employment differs from that listed in Table IV-15.  The difference is
      that the above data are aggregated by place of residence; those in Table 1 are
      aggregated by place of employment.
                             IV-47

-------
F.   LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT

     Land use is one  physical manifestation of social and economic  values.
In the following section,  data  describing past and current land use,  as well
as projected social and  economic  trends, are used to project future land  use.

     1.    Established Uses  of Land

          The following  discussion of land use is weighted toward current in-
     formation;  a detailed  historical record of land use in Fulton County is
     not available.   The discussion is divided into two major categories:

          •   Land use  patterns
          •   Use of strip-mined land.

          a.   Land use  pattern - The only available county-wide inventory
          of land use was made  in 1968 (Harland  Bartholomew and Associates,
          1969).   Recent low rates of social and economic change in Fulton
          County indicate that  1968 data reliably approximate current condi-
          tions.   According to  these data, most of the land in Fulton County
          is  devoted  to  unintensive use.   Approximately 88% of the land is
          either covered by forest or water, used for agriculture, or is  va-
          cant.   Fallow  strip-mined land covers nearly 7% of the land.  Pub-
          lic and semi-public areas, mostly unintensively used, cover over 3%
          of  the county.  Only  the 2% of remaining land is used intensively.
          Intensive uses amount to a little over 1% residential, less than 0.5%
          commercial,  and about 0.7% industrial.

              While  quantitative estimates of past land use are generally
          unavailable, some estimates of agricultural  and strip-mining acre-
          age were obtained.  Data from the Census of Agriculture (see Table IV-17,
          page IV-42)  show that the percent of land in the county davoted to agri-
          culture decreased from 87.5% in 1945 to 82.7% in 1969.  This change
          was accompanied, from 1945 to 1969,  by a decrease of 60,000 acres
          of  pasture  and an increase of 32,000 acres of cropland.   By 1974
          approximately  5,000 acres of strip-mined land had been added to
                                  IV-48

-------
the 1969 county-wide total of 40,000 acres (Sardberg, 1973).  Due to
recently increased requirements for land reclamation, this added acre-
age has been reclaimed to a degree much closer to its original state
than were most of the 40,000 acres.

     A representation of land use near the project area is provided in
Figure TV-11,  This map shows the strong orientation of intensive uses
to Canton and, to a lesser extent, Lewistown.   Wee-Ma-Tuk Hills and
Spoon River College are the major intensively  developed sites near the
project area; both exhibit potential for future growth.

     The predominant urban land use is residential, accounting for al-
most 38% of the total urban area (Harland  Bartholomew and Associates,
1969).  Most industrial activities are located in or adjacent to urban
areas; remaining rural industrial operations are mostly agriculturally
oriented.  Strip-mining activities are located in the central, north-
eastern, and southwestern sections of the county.  Agricultural activi-
ties are located throughout the county.

     Substantial, widely scattered forests are located along streams
and in areas where steep slopes have limited the use of the land.  Ma-
jor conservation districts are locate'd along the Illinois River.  Parks
and private recreation clubs occupy many other scattered areas.  Hunt-
ing, fishing, and camping are the primary recreational activities.  Most
recreation is seasonal and requires an extensive amount of land per user.
Most regional recreation is concentrated at Dickson Mounds State Park
and throughout the Spoon River Valley.  Parks  are planned for several
sites near the Spoon River (Bordner, 1975).

     The major land holders in Fulton County are the mining companies, incor-
porated firms and owners of a number of large  farms, as well as MSDGC.  Land
holdings as of 1973 are detailed in Table IV-22 on the following page,
indicating that large portions of the county are owned by relatively
few individuals and corporations.  The existence of large tracts of
land makes it relatively easy  to buy land for recreation, conserva-
tion, industrial development, or strip mining.
                               IV-49

-------
                                                         THfc ILLINOIS
                                                         STATE MUSEUM
                                                         DICKSON MOUNDS
                                                     ^LIVERPOOL BAR6E DOCK
                                                               SPOON RIVER VALLEY
                                                               SCENIC DRIVE
                                                          	MSO PIPELINE

                                                            5;  COUNTY HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                               US HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                               STATE HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                               SPECIAL POINT OF INTEREST


                                                                Residential  and

                                                                Commercial  areas

                                                            P   PICNICKING  C - CAMPING

                                                                Strip Mining
;-''i.re IV-1!.   Fulton County Land Use,  K68
                 (Harland  Bartholomew ard Ps!cria^e-,  1969}

-------
    Table  IV-22.    Major Land  Holders  in  Fulton  County,  1973
                   (Fulton County Plat Book,  1973)

Land Holders
Total County Land
Mining Companies
Incorporated Farms (9 companies)
Other Major Farms (18 owners)
MSDGC
State of Illinois
Private Recreation
Banks
Major Developers
Industrial Firms
Total
Acres
561,152.00
41,716.58
25,382.90
12,576.05
9,711.31*
4,266.33
2,912.28
1,998.90
1,676.44
832.40
101,073.19
Percent
100.00
7.43
4.52
2.24
1.73
0.76
0.51
0.35
0.29
0.14
18.01

     Acreage is 15,528 as of August 1975
     b.    Use of strip-mined land - A 1973 survey identified  land  use
     in  currently and formerly strip-mined areas (Sandberg, 1973).
     Table IV-23 summarizes the existing use of reclaimed and unreclaimed
     strip-mined lands.  Unreclaimed lands were defined as "areas  where
     no  attempt has been made to reclaim stripped land to a productive
     use".  Reclaimed lands were defined as "areas where the  land  has
     been leveled to reasonable slopes and surface drainage has  been re-
     stored".  Fulton County contains about 21,600 acres of unreclaimed
     and 15,500 acres of reclaimed strip-mined lands.   Most unreclaimed
     areas are in woodlands, light cover, or no cover; most reclaimed
     areas are in light cover, light pasture, or heavy pasture.   In  1973,
     none of the unreclaimed mining sites and less than 3% of the  re-
     claimed sites were used as cropland.

2.    Projected Uses of Land

     The 1990 land use plan for Fulton County designates future  land
use  on  the basis of 1968 estimates of future demographic and economic
                               IV-51

-------
Table IV-23.   1973 Land Use Survey  of  Strip-Mine  Lands  in  Fulton  County,  Illinois  (Sandberg, 1973)
"~-~-^___^^ Type of Land
Use "~-~~^^_
A. Woodlands
B. Light Cover
C. Light Pasture
0. Heavy Pasture
E. Cropland
F. Residence
G. Commerce
H. Industry
I. Landfill
J. Public Recreation
K. Private Recreation
L. Public & Semipublic
M. Conservation-Wildlife
N. Unused-No Cover
TOTAL ACRES
VALUE PER ACRE*
Total
Unreclaimed
Lands
8518
6547
1011
-
-
-
-
222
15
-
190
-
-
5068
21,571
Unreclaimed Lands
Mine Water
Wastes Areas
-
-
247
-
-
-
-
316
-
-
374
9
3888
1978
2,541 4,271
$259 **
Reclaimed
Lands
392
4064
5992
3123
405
251
-
-
-
-
241
-
-
988
15,456
$323
     * Value Per  Acre  »  100% value in 1967 dollars
    ** Does  not include  the value of mining equipment and structures.


 Notes;

A.  Woodlands included dense,  forested lands  where the ground surface was  not visible
or  rarely seen in the aerial  photographic interpretation.

B.  Light Cover describes areas with surface  cover of some  form or other,
usually grasses,  low shrubs and scattered trees.

C.  Light Pasture often included newly reclaimed  areas where surface foliage was
provided for grazing.   In other natural  areas,  the distinction between light cover
and light pasture was  made on  the basis  of visible animal paths from fields
to  barns or sheds.

D.  Heavy Pasture included areas where large-scale grazing  operations were found.
Stock trails, animal pens, feeding stations and the like were often used  to
determine the scale of operation.

E.  Cropland is determined by  the visible pattern of planted or harvested  crops.

F.  Residence Areas are determined by the outline of buildings, driveways,
and arrangement of lots.

G.  Commerce includes  small  commercial facilities usually associated with  highways
in  the smaller communities.

H.  Industry includes  active mining  areas, railroads,  coal  tipples and similar
intensive operations.

I.  Landfill is an area where  solid  waste materials are buried in  a deep  trench
and covered with dirt.

J-  Public Recreation  Areas are owned by a public agency or unit of local  government
andaremade available  for use  by the general  public.

K-  Private Recreation Areas  include golf clubs,  private reserves, camps  and the  like
and are available to members  or owners,  not the general  public.

L.  Public and Semipublic Lands^ include  schools,  churches,  cemeteries,  public sewage
plants and similar uses.

M.  Conservation-Wildlife Areas include  water areas and surrounding lands  which,  by
virtue of proximity, create a  habitat for wildlife.

N.  Unused-No Cover Lands are  areas  where soil  conditions are not  conducive  to growth of
natural vegetation.  These lands are often associated  with  mine waste areas.
                                      IV-52

-------
change.  Since the anticipated changes were minor, these future desig-
nations are closely related to the existing land use pattern (Figure
IV-11, page IV-50).

     Residential  uses are expected to increasingly concentrate in and
near the established urbanized areas.  Major residential growth is ex-
pected to the east and northwest of Canton; to the north, east, and
west of Lewistown; to the west and northeast of Farmington; and around
Avon, Cuba, and Vermont.   Increases are anticipated in the number of
single-family, multi-family and mobile home dwellings in tract subdivi-
sions, and decreases are expected in the number of farm residences.

    Commercial uses are predicted to concentrate in the central busi-
ness districts of Canton, Lewistown and Farmington.  The plan antici-
pates major industrial areas near Liverpool and in and near Canton,
Lewistown, and Farmington.  The anticipated major new public lands are
six reservoirs with adjacent forest preserves (see Figure IV-13, page IV-
59).   Conservation and recreation expansion would concentrate in the
surroundings of the Spoon River Scenic Drive along the river from Dick-
son Mounds to London Mills.

     Most future  strip mining is expected to occur north of Canton.
A major emphasis  in the county's land use policy is the reclamation
of strip-mined lands.  Stringent conditional use permits regulate the
nuisance aspects  of strip mining and require substantial reclamation
of the land.  Land use is also regulated on a county-wide basis by a
zoning ordinance, arid Canton, Cuba and Farmington have separate or-
dinances.

3.   Land Development Potential

     The potential for actual land development depends upon the inter-
action among land suitability, accessibility and attractiveness,
with the social and economic factors of land use demand discussed earlier.
The suitability,  accessibility and attractiveness of land are the physical
                              IV-53

-------
components of development potential;  they  deal  with  the  conditions  of
the site, its location and aesthetics.   These factors  are  discussed
separately in this section.

     a.   Land suitability - Suitability of the project  site  for vari-
     ous land uses is affected by topography, soils  and  drainage.   The
     application fields, once leveled and  graded,  have a gently slop-
     ing surface which would easily accommodate a  variety of  land uses,
     including roads, housing, industry, row-crop  farming and livestock
     feedlots.  Slightly steeper surrounding slopes  are  better suited
     for pasture and tree farming.   Erosion and construction  problems
     on the steepest slopes make them best suited  for  unintensive re-
     creation and conservation.

          Problems of settlement with unconsolidated soils in the strip-
     mined sections of the project area would most likely make it pro-
     hibitively expensive to accommodate hard surface  roads,  underground
     utilities, and residential or industrial structures.   Current levels
     of available plant nutrients and organic matter make these soils
     unsuitable for intensive agriculture.  Soils  of the undisturbed
     place lands do not present these limitations.

          Drainage control systems developed with  the  application fields
     increase their suitability for potentially polluting land uses, in-
     cluding industries with hazardous spill potential,  livestock feed-
     lots and intensive crop production involving  high application rates
     of fertilizers and pesticides.  Polluted runoff and erosion are
     much more difficult to contain outside the application fields.

     b.   Land accessibility - Of course,  transportation has  a marked
     influence upon the potential for land development.   Access to ma-
     jor population centers significantly  affects  the  number  of poten-
     tial visitors to regional recreation  and conservation sites.  Ac-
     cess to Peoria and surrounding manufacturing  zones  strongly influ-
     ences the extent of large-scale residential development.
                              IV-54

-------
     The project area is not easily accessible from Peoria and
and other population centers because the roads in Fulton County
are generally two-lane pavements of poor quality.  Until high-
speed roads are built, it is expected that most traffic will be
oriented locally.  Figure IV-12 is a graphic representation of
traffic volumes in 1965.  If a proposed limited-access highway
were built between Canton and Peoria, significant increases in
the inter-city traffic volume could result.  However, construc-
tion of this road has not been authorized, and once authorized
will take many years to complete.  Freight service is available
on three railroads in Fulton County.  The Rock Island Railroad
provides passenger service in Peoria.  An airport in Canton can
handle light planes (3,900 ft. runway), and the Greater Peoria
Airport has regularly scheduled jet service.  Docking facilities
at Liverpool and Havana provide water transportation to the Chi-
cago region and Lake Michigan and to points south along the Illi-
nois and Mississippi Rivers.

     The quality and availability of utilities also heavily in-
fluences land development.  At the project site, electricity is
readily available, and bottled gas is used extensively for local
farms and mobile homes.  Natural gas  pipelines are not expected
in the project area because of the expense involved in building
through disturbed soils and the risk involved in predicting gas
prices and availability.  The only large supply of water in the
project area is from wells; this source is too high in dissolved
minerals to be used conveniently or in quantity for residential
or industrial purposes.  Surface reservoirs are being planned at
sites near Canton and along the Spoon River for future supplies
of high quality water.

c.   Land attractiveness - Factors which affect the attractive-
ness of land are landscape quality, historic resources, and nui-
sance factors.  Landscape quality varies according to subjective
interpretations of the viewer.  Hunters and fishermen are attrac-
ted to the abundant prairie wildlife habitats and the crystal  blue
                         IV-55

-------
         Cuba
              J
           Lewistown
         Vehicles Per  Day
         ^^   4,000

                 3,000
                 2,000
Finure ! •- • "."
Average Traffic Vc'urnes near the Prr-c.
(1965 data.   Harlard Par'brlci^ew ?,nu "'
                                                                " c p u

-------
lakes of the project area.  Fanners may dislike the visible loss
of farmland to the strip mine shovel.  Prospective rural homeowners
may shun the barren waste of unreclaimed mine spoils.  One method
of evaluating landscape quality is to assess the diversity of land-
scape elements.   The project area contains streams and clear blue
lakes, contrasting with the greens and browns of the landscape;
steep slopes and level  fields; dense, cultivated vegetation on the
application fields and sparse vegetation elsewhere.

     The influence of historical  factors on development of the pro-
ject site is probably nil.  Farming became an early major influ-
ence when the land that was to become Fulton County was made part
of a larger area known as the "Military Tract," designated for use
in paying soldiers for service in the War of 1812.  The second his-
torical influence is that of coal  mining.   The first mining of shal-
low coal deposits pre-dated the Civil War.  Since World War I,
highly mechanized strip mines have extensively altered the land-
scape in Fulton  County.  Neither of these influences, however, have
produced tangible historic resources at the project site.

     Dominant nuisance factors influencing the attractiveness of
the project site are the odors emanating from sludge holding basins
and dispersing from sludge spray during spraying operations, and
the visual blight of sludge spraying.  Neither source of nuisance
is a permanent deterrent to human settlement since each would be
abandoned in the event of an alternative use for the project site.
However, in the  interim these nuisances may be decisive in their
affect on nearby residential expansion (e.g., Wee-Ma-Tuk Hills).
                         IV-57

-------
U.   ilil V iKUHl'H-11 IMi-L I  OE.I1Q1 I IVC. r\l\L.n5

     Fulton County has a number of environmentally sensitive land areas and
resources.  These are depicted in Figure IV-13 and identified in the ensuing
discussion of water,  land, and cultural  resources.

    1.   Water Resources

         Surface water is particularly important in Fulton County because
    most of the groundwater contains over 1,500 ppm of dissolved minerals
    and is unsuitable for public water supply without expensive treatment.
    Surface water, having a considerably lower concentration of dissolved
    minerals, is therefore a valuable source for public and industrial wa-
    ter supplies.

         Six multi-use reservoirs (forest, conservation, recreation, and
    water supply) are planned to maximize future use of surface water sup-
    plies.  Pollution in the Spoon River or Copperas Creek watersheds would
    severely degrade the value of these resources.  The entire length of
    the Spoon River is especially valuable because it is one of the last re-
    maining natural streams in the State of Illinois.

         Wetland areas comprise another environmentally sensitive local
    resource;  they are located primarily in the flood plain of the Illinois
    River and are not directly affected by the project.  Major wetland conser-
    vation areas include Rice and Anderson Lakes, which serve as habitats for
    large populations of game and migratory birds.  Lakes and ponds created by
    strip mining in the project area are currently important to a flock of
    Canada geese.
    2.   Land Resources

         Besides the flood plain wetlands, there are four upland types of
    environmentally sensitive land in Fulton County.  The first of these,
    strip-mined  land, is  particularly susceptible to damage by erosion.
    Sparse vegetative cover, steep slopes, and poor soil permeability are
    three  factors  contributing to the erosion of unreclaimed or incompletely
    reclaimed strip-mined areas.  Erosion diminishes downstream water quality
    and accelerates sedimentation in downstream reservoirs.
                                   IV-58

-------
                                           SUGAR KNOLUS
                                               PC
WILDWOOD  „ .
HAVENS     - !
PC
                                              5f  HOLDING BASINS

                                                 ''Vsr DAVID
                                              MSD   N
                                        RECLAMATION PROJECT
                                       PUTMAN   BRYANT^
                                                      CJP
                                                       IP
                                                             THE ILLINOIS
                                                             STATE MUSEUM
                                                             DICKSON MOUNDS
                                                      ^ ^rilVERPOOL BARGE DOCK
                                                                   SPOON RIVER VALLEY
                                                                   SCENIC DRIVE
                                                              --- MSD PIPELINE

                                                                   COUNTY HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                                   US HIGHWAY MARKER

                                                                   STATE HIGHWAY MARKER
                                                               A  SPECIAL POINT OF INTEREST
                                                                            A
                                                              nun Conservation  Zones

                                                                    Proposed Reservoirs

                                                                    and Forest  Preserves
   Figure  IV-13.   Major Environmentally Sensitive Areas  in Fulton County
                    (Herland  Bartholomew Associates, 1969)

-------
     Prime agricultural  land,  watershed woodland,  and tall grass prairie
are valuable  natural  resources.   The prime agricultural  lands in Fulton
County are characterized by thick, deeply  weathered loess  soils,  small
topographic relief, and few stones in the  upper soil  layers.   Large
fields of these prime soils are well  suited for highly mechanized me-
thods of agricultural  production.

     The main values of local  woodland are its recreation  potential
and ability to protect the quality of surface water by stabilizing
soils and reducing runoff volume and  velocity, which  are key factors
in erosion.  The local importance of  surface water in Fulton County
intensifies the value of these woodlands.   The most valuable wood-
lands are found in the watershed of the Spoon River valley and in
watersheds upstream from each  of the  planned reservoirs.

     Prairie, particularly tallgrass  prairie, such as that being
planted as a part of the Big Bluestem Management Plan, is  environ-
mentally valuable for a number of reasons.  First, it would preserve
a rare portion of Illinois natural history.  In addition,  such prairie
can serve as a conservation area for  wildlife, including such locally
rare species as the greater prairie chicken, sharp-tailed  grouse, trum-
peter swan, and the sandhill crane.  Finally, prairie grasses, with
their deep abundant roots, provide excellent soil-building and erosion
control characteristics.

3.   Cultural Resources

     Fulton County has numerous areas devoted primarily to outdoor re-
creation.  Local recreation needs of  many  residents are met by public
park districts in Canton, Lewistown,  and Farmington.   Public recreation
needs of a more regional scope are served  by a 400-acre tract of land
which has been made available to the  county by the MSDGC.   Private
recreation includes an area at Lake Wee-Ma-Tuk, several private
hunting and fishing areas on strip-mined lands, and campsites with
trails for use of off-the-road vehicles on private lands.   The most
environmentally sensitive recreation  resources are those located adja-
cent to streams and lakes.
                             IV-60

-------
     Fulton County has a number of historic and archeological  sites.
Old mansions, "underground railway" stations,  and early shaft  coal
mines are located throughout the county.   An extensive prehistoric
mound-building culture left over 800 mounds in the area that is  now
Fulton County.  The most important of these, the Dickson Mounds, are
preserved as a state museum.
                              IV-61

-------
                               BIBLIOGRAPHY
A&H Engineering Corporation,  Subsurface Investigation  and  Evaluation,  Land
Reclamation and Beautification Project, Fulton  County, Illinois,  prepared
for the MSDGC, 1971.

Bordner, M., Telephone Interview,  1975.

Canton Chamber of Commerce, Survey of the Inhabitants  of Canton,  1975.

Casagrande, A., "Classification and Identification of  Soils,"  Trans.
American Society of Civil  Engineers,  V. 113,  1948.

Durfer, C. N. and E.  Becker,  Geological Water Supply Paper,  U.S.  Depart-
ment of the Interior, 1965.

Fulton County Tax Assessor's  Office,  Fulton County Plat Book.  1973.

Fulton County Tax Assessor's  Office,  Tax Assessment Records, 1963,  1971,
1975.

Griffin, D. W. and D. L. Chicoine, West-Central Illinois:   A Regional  Pro-
file, 1974.

Harland Bartholomew and Associates, Fulton County Comprehensive Plan,  1969.

Hooper, L. T., Appendix VII:   "Subsurface Investigation and  Evaluation,
Land Reclamation and Beautification Project,  Fulton County,  Illinois,"
prepared for the MSDGC by the A&H  Engineering Corporation, 1971.

MSDGC, "Ammonia Volatilization and Ammonia Fixation by Sludge  Fertilized
Calcareous Strip-Mined Spoil  Material," presented at the annual meeting
of the American Society of Agronomy,  November 1973, by the MSDGC RD&D
Department, May 1974.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report for Fulton County, Illinois,
R&D Department, 1972 to July  1975b.

MSDGC, Flood Control. October 1975a.

National Climatic Center, "Local Climatological Data,  Annual Summary  With
Comparative Data," Greater Peoria  Airport, Station No. 14842,  1970  through
1974b.

National Climatic Center, "Local Climatological Data,  Monthly Summary,"
Greater Peoria Airport, Station No. 14842, September 1973  through August
1975.

National Climatic Center, "Seasonal and Annual  Wind Distribution by Pasquill
Stability Classes, STAR Program,"  Station No. 14842, Peoria, Illinois, Novem-
ber 1974a.
                                    IV-62

-------
Sandberg, Charles, et al..  Survey of Strip  Mined  Lands  in Fulton County,
Illinois, 1973.
Turner, D. B., "Pasquill  Stability Classification," Journal of Applied
Meteorology. February 1964.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  Census of Agriculture,  1940, 1945, 1950, 1959,
1969.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  Census of Business.  1948,  1954, 1958, 1963,
1967, 1972.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  Census of Governments,  1957, 1962, 1967, 1972.
U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Manufacturers. 1939,  1947, 1954, 1963,
1972.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  Census of Mineral  Industries, 1954, 1958, 1963,
1967, 1972.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  Census of Population.  1930.  1940, 1950, 1960,
1970.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  County and City  Data Book.  1972, March 1973.
U.S. Bureau of the Census,  County Business  Patterns,  1950, 1959, 1964, 1969.
U.S.G.S., 1972 Mater Resources Data for Illinois.  U.S.  Department of the
Interior, 1972.
U.S.G.S., 1973 Water Resources Data for Illinois,  U.S.  Department of the
Interior, 1973.
U.S. Government, Federal  Register. V. 40, No.  127, July 1, 1975,
U.S. Public Health Service,  Drinking Water  Standards.  U.S. Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1962.
U.S. Public Health Service,  Manual for Evaluating  Public Drinking Water
Supplies, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1969.
U.S. Water Resources Council, 1972 Obers  Projections.  Series E, April 1974.
World Health Organization,  International  Standards for Drinking Water,
2nd ed., 1963.
                                  IV-63

-------
              V.   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS
                   OF SLUDGE PROCESSING AND DISPOSAL

     The cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of sludge processing
and disposal must be evaluated in terms of system costs, reliability,
and environmental effects.  For example, the least-cost alternative may
be unacceptable if it would incur severe environmental  impacts that can-
not be mitigated at reasonable cost.  An alternative having the least
potential for environmental harm may be infeasible if its required re-
source commitment is not economically justified.   Substantial  uncer-
tainty in the state-of-the-art of an alternative  method still  in an ex-
perimental phase may cancel its potential  cost savings  or environmental
advantages.  Trade-offs among these three factors can lead to  the iden-
tification of the most cost-effective alternative.

     The optimization of these factors requires the separate evaluation
of subsystem options for sludge processing and disposal, which can be
classified as:

     •    Sludge dewatering subsystems
     •    Sludge stabilization subsystems
     t    Sludge disposal subsystems
     •    Sludge utilization subsystems
     •    Sludge transportation subsystems

Three to five options for each subsystem category are found in this chap-
ter.   Linkages  between subsystems are also discussed.  Candidate subsys-
tems are assessed and inferior options are rejected on  the basis of pro-
cess reliability, unit costs, and environmental implications.   Subse-
quently, system alternatives are assembled using  compatible combinations
of available and feasible subsystems.  A matrix summarizing and comparing
the system alternatives is presented at the conclusion  of this chapter.
                                   V-l

-------
A.   SLUDGE DEWATERING SUBSYSTEMS

     Sludge dewatering is an important process in sludge volume reduc-
tion which renders sludge handling more manageable.   Available dewater-
ing processes include:

     •    Air drying on sand beds
     •    Thickening by gravity sedimentation or flotation
     •    Dewatering by centrifugation and vacuum filtration
     •    Dual cell gravity dewatering and freezing-thawing
          techniques
     •    Use of moving filter screens or a belt-filter press
          or vertical screw press.

Among these processes, concentration of raw sludge by air drying on
sand beds and gravity sedimentation or flotation, followed by vacuum
filtration or centrifugation, are the most frequently encountered pro-
cesses and have received a great amount of study, research and testing.
Four processes are described separately in this section.

     1.   Air Drying

          Air drying of sewage sludge on sand beds has been the most common
     method of dewatering.  The process is accomplished by drainage, which
     predominates during the early stages, and evaporation.  Approximately
     60 to 85% of the water is removed by drainage (Swanwick, 1962).  The
     rate of drainage depends on sludge characteristics and initial solids
     concentration.

          Evaporation rates, and the ultimate moisture content of air dried
     sludge, depend upon air temperature, wind speed, amount and rate of
     precipitation, sunshine, and relative humidity.  Drying of sludge takes
     approximately 6 weeks during the summer  (Fleming, 1959), and about two
     times longer in the winter.  The drying  process can be hastened by cover-
     ing  the beds and providing an artificial heat source.
                                  V-2

-------
     Sludge characteristics have a marked influence upon drying rates.
In general, sludges containing grit dry more quickly than those con-
taining grease.  New sludge dries faster than aged sludge, and primary
sludge dries faster than secondary sludge.   Digested sludge cracks
earlier and dries faster than raw sludge.  It is important that sludge
be well digested for optimum drying (Burd,  1968).  After the sludge
has been drained and dried sufficiently to be classified as spadeable
(moisture content 60 to 70%), it is removed from the drying beds.   The
dried sludge is either landfilled or given away as soil fertilizer.

     MacLaren has reported the annual capital costs of drying beds in
Canada, for the year 1961 and a population equivalent of 10,000, to
be $2.65 per dry ton.  Annual operating costs, including hauling,
ranged between $1 and $10 per dry ton, depending upon hauling dis-
tance.  In general, the combined annual capital and operating costs
for sand bed drying range between $3 and $20 per dry ton (Burd, 1968).

     Based on the 1972 dollar and excluding hauling costs, operating
and maintenance costs for sand beds with a capacity greater than 100
dry tons per day are less than $2 per dry ton per year (Stanley Consul-
tants, 1972).  Operating costs can be offset by selling dried sludge as a
soil conditioner.  Shredded sludge has been sold for as much as $6 to $10
per cubic yard (Burd, 1968), which is equivalent to $4.50 to $7.50 per
dry ton.  Air drying can be an economical method for sludge dewatering
when low value land is available.

     Environmental effects associated with sand beds include unpleasant
odors and attraction of flies.  In addition, to prevent contamination
of groundwater, the drainage must be returned to the head of the treat-
ment plant.  When the sludge supernatant or drainage effluent is returned
to the plant, fine solids and soluble solids are undifferentially  re-
cycled.  This causes accumulation of nitrogen in the plant, reducing
plant performance and increasing nitrogen levels in the plant effluent.
This could lead to adverse impact on water quality of receiving streams
and lakes.
                               V-3

-------
2.   Sedimentation-Flotation

     Thickening of sludge may be accomplished by gravity settling or
dissolved air flotation.   Primary sludge and  sludge from modified aera-
tion systems are effectively  thickened by gravity settling; sludge from
activated processes such  as  contact stabilization and conventional acti-
vated sludge are more effectively thickened by air flotation.

     Gravity thickening operates on the principle that the force of
gravity will cause solids to  be separated from the liquid phase in a
settling tank.   The weight of overlying solids compacts the sludge that
is gathered at the bottom of  the tank.   This  compacted sludge  is with-
drawn, and the supernatant is returned to the head of the plant.  Sludge
volume reduction can be as high as 50% by gravity settling. The solids
content of the thickened  sludge ranges from 3% or more for conventional
activated sludge to as high  as 15% for raw primary sludge.   The degree
of volume reduction or thickening depends primarily on the type of
sludge and its volatile solids concentration.

     In the flotation thickening process, solids are induced to float
and thereby separate from the liquid phase.  Before it is introduced
to the bottom of the flotation unit, the sludge is finely mixed with
air.  When the sludge-air mixture enters the  unit, minute air  bubbles
are formed which adhere to the sludge particles and render the solids
buoyant.  The sludge floats  to the top and is skimmed off; the under-
flow is returned to the head  of the plant.  Flotation thickening gen-
erally produces sludge containing a higher level of solids than does
gravity thickening.  An achievement of 4% solids is considered normal
for a flotation thickener, and 5 to 6% is not unusual.  Chemicals are
used on occasion to facilitate the thickening process.  Primary vari-
ables in this process are pressure, recycle ratio, feed solids content,
detention period, air-to-solids ratio, type and quality of sludge,
solids and hydraulic loading rates, and the use of chemical acids.
                                V-4

-------
     Capita] and operating costs of thickening equipment vary widely
and are location dependent.  Gravity thickening, in general, has higher
initial costs and lower operating costs than pressurized flotation thick-
ening.  Maintenance and operating costs for gravity thickening amount
to approximately $2 per dry ton of sludge per year (Burd, 1968).  An-
nual capital and operating costs generally range from $1.50 to $5 per
dry ton (Burd, 1968).  Annual  operating costs for flotation thickening
range between $4 and $5 per dry ton, or $9 to $11 per dry ton with the
use of chemical acids (Burd, 1968).

     Combined annual capital,  maintenance and operating costs for gra-
vity thickening decrease with  increasing plant capacity, ranging downward
from $2 per dry ton for a plant size of 100 dry tons  per day to $1.5 per
dry ton for a plant size of 1,000 dry tons  per day, based on the 1972 dol-
lar (Stanley Consultants, 1972).   The total  annual  costs for flotation
thickening, without the use of chemical  acids, are  the  same as for gravity
thickening for this range of plant sizes.

     The main environmental problems encountered with these processes
are associated with energy consumption, odor, and noise.  Flotation
thickening requires more energy than gravity thickening.  Because of
unavoidable agitation from uprising bubbles in the flotation units,
open flotation systems generally have more odor potential than gravity
sedimentation units.  In addition, flotation requires either air com-
pressors or vacuum pumps, which are sources of noise.  Flotation-con-
centration also requires the recycling of underflow and drain water
back to the head of the treatment plant, leading to the same effects
as described under air drying.

3.   Centrifugation

     This process occurs in a  centrifuge, where centrifugal force
applied to the solids separates them from the liquid  phase.  Three
types of centrifuges are available for sludge dewatering; basket,
disc, and solid bowl centrifuges. A number of factors must be con-
sidered in the selection of a  centrifuge, the most important of
                              V-5

-------
which are detention time, hydraulic and solids loading, centrifugal
force, permissible amount of solids slippage, desired concentration,
and polyelectric dosage (Barnhill, Dresser and McKee, 1974).

     The disc type centrifuge can concentrate activated sludge up to
7« solid at 6,000 rpm, but clogging of the sludge discharge nozzles
necessitates frequent maintenance.  Solid-bowl centrifuges thicken
sludge to approximately 7 or 7.5% solids.  In this type of centrifuge,
a one-to-one mixture of primary and activated sludges can be thick-
ened up to 9.8%, and solids recovery is better than 95%.  A high con-
centration of solids is attainable with some sacrifice in solids re-
covery.  In general, highly volatile sludge does not thicken as well as
sludge low in volatiles.  Centrifuge performance can be improved signi-
ficantly with the aid of cationic polyelectrolytes.

     Annual operating costs range between $3 and $8 per dry ton, and
will run $3 to $10 more per dry ton when chemicals are used (Burd,
1968).  The Scottish Development Department (1974), reporting on a
study of centrifugation at a regional sludge-processing facility,
stated that solid-bowl, Scroll-type centrifugation of raw sludge pro-
duced a cake with 23% solids at a total cost of $29 per dry ton per
year.  According to Stanley Consultants, the total annual capital,
operating and maintenance costs of centrifugation for a plant hold-
ing more than 500 dry tons of sludge per day are less than $15 per
dry ton, based on the 1972 dollar.

     Adverse environmental effects resulting from centrifugation are
slight.  Because centrifuges consist of rapidly moving parts and motors,
noise generation is a possible problem.  Odor problems are minimal be-
cause the process is generally closed.  Centrifugation also produces
the accumulation of nitrogen in the plant as was noted for sand beds
and sedimentation-flotation units; this  reduces plant efficiency.
                                V-6

-------
4.   Vacuum Filtration

     In the vacuum filtration process, sludge particles are separated
from water by applying a vacuuming force to sludge on a filter medium.
A vacuum filter consists of a compartmented drum rotating on a hori-
zontal axis.  About one third of the drum is submerged in a shallow
tank containing the sludge slurry to be dewatered.  The drum is co-
vered with a filter medium which consists of either a cloth, screen
or stainless steel coils.  A vacuum is applied to the underside of the
filter medium.  Sludge cake is formed on the drum and eventually is
scraped off and discharged to a conveyer belt or chute  (Barnhill,
Dresser and McKee, 1974).

     Important sludge variables affecting filtration performance in-
clude volatile and solids content and sludge age and viscosity.  Op-
erating variables include the degree of vacuum, drum speed, degree of
sludge agitation, filter medium, and conditioning of the sludge prior
to filtration.  Moisture content of the sludge cake produced varies be-
tween 80 and 85% for activated sludge, and between 70 and 75% for raw
primary sludge, depending upon the nature of the sludge and the amount
of conditioning chemicals used.  Among many conditioning agents, ferric
chloride and lime are the most frequently utilized.

     Simpson and Sutton (1964) surveyed vacuum filtration costs at
various sewage treatment plants and found total annual costs, includ-
ing labor and supervision, chemicals and supplies, electric power,
maintenance, and indirect costs,to vary between $5.34 and $30.17 per
dry ton.  Small plants usually had higher chemical costs.  For large
plants, vacuum filtration of composite digested primary sludge and
activated sludge incurred operating costs close to $30 per dry ton
per year.  Stanley Consultants report that annual operating and main-
tenance costs range downward from $15 to $11 per dry ton for plants
handling 100 to 1,000 dry tons of sludge per day, with chemical con-
ditioning, and based on the 1972 dollar.
                                V-7

-------
     Vacuum filtration almost  always  requires  chemical  conditioning
of sludge, which constitutes a large  portion of  its  operating  costs.
On the other hand,  as  compared to  centrifugation,  maintenance  costs
are lower.  Also, while the initial costs of vacuum  filtration are
comparatively lower, these are partially offset  by higher cost of
power (Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 1972).

     Vacuum filters present the same  problems  of plant  nitrogen  build-
up as the aforementioned processes.   In addition,  vacuum filters pre-
sent a greater odor problem, but a  lesser noise  problem, than  centri-
fuges.
                               V-8

-------
B-   SLUDGE STABILIZATION SUBSYSTEMS

     Sludge stabilization processes convert noxious and putrescible sub-
stances into stable products acceptable for final  disposal.   In some pro-
cesses, such as incineration, reduction of sludge volume is  accomplished
simultaneously with sludge stabilization.   Sludge can be stabilized by
biological, physical and/or chemical methods.   Among these methods, heated
anaerobic digestion, Imhoff digestion, incineration, heat drying,  and wet
air oxidation are the most frequently used.  Selection of a  stabilization
method depends upon the type and nature of the sludge, available pretreat-
ment and final disposal alternatives, reliability and costs, energy conser-
vation and other environmental  considerations.  Each of these five methods
of stabilization is discussed in the following sections.

     1.    Heated Anaerobic Digestion

          Anaerobic digestion can  be defined as  the biological  decomposi-
     tion of organic matter in  the absence of  molecular oxygen.  This  pro-
     cess can be accelerated by heating the sludge  with combustion of  di-
     gester gases.   Decomposition  is accomplished  by gasification, liqui-
     faction, stabilization, breakdown of  colloidal structure,  and re-
     lease of moisture by a mixed  culture  of microorganisms.  Two  groups
     of microorganisms are predominantly responsible for the decomposi-
     tion of organic material.   The first  group, which consists of facul-
     tative and anaerobic bacteria collectively  called acid  formers,  hy-
     drolyzes and ferments complex organic compounds into simple organic
     acids.  The second group strictly consists  of anaerobes called me-
     thane formers, which convert  organic  acids  formed by the first group
     into methane gas and carbon dioxide.

          In this digestion  process,  decomposition  is  not  complete.  Inter-
     mediate products  of  metabolism include organic acids, ammonia, methane,
     hydrogen  sulfide,  carbon dioxide,  and  carbonates.  A  60  to  75% reduc-
     tion  in volatile  solids  is  commonly achieved by anaerobic  digestion,
     depending  upon  the initial  volatile solids  content of the  sludge  and
     the  environment in the  digesters.  An  environment which  maintains a
                                    V-9

-------
state of dynamic equilibrium between the acid formers and the methane
formers is essential for optimal performance.  Optimal environmental
conditions are:

     t    85 to 100°F  (if the mesophilic or mid-range is selected)
     •    Strictly anaerobic conditions
     t    pH value between 6.6 and 7.6
     •    Good mixing of the sludge under digestion
     •    Sufficient biological nutrients
     •    Absence of toxic materials or inhibitors.

To attain mesophilic conditions in the digester, methane in the di-
gester gases is utilized to heat the sludge.   Sufficient digestion time
is important for successful  operation.   When  digestion is proceeding satis-
factorily, alkalinity (as calcium carbonate)  normally ranges between 1,000
and 5,000 mg/1, and the volatile acids  are less than 250 mg/1  (as  acetic
acid).  Therefore, the performance of a digester is indicated by the pH
value, alkalinity, volatile acids content, and volatile solids content of
the digester effluent.   High pH and alkalinity, as well  as  low volatile
acids and volatile solids, indicate good performance.

     Heated anaerobic digestion may compete in cost with mechanical de-
watering and incineration.  Digestion is a redundant process if sludge
is eventually to be incinerated.  In addition, sludge low in organic mat-
ter and high in toxic material, such as industrial sludge,  is not  suit-
able for digestion since it is toxic to bacteria.
     Anaerobic digestion costs  have been  reported  in many sources.   Ini-
tial  capital  costs are  approximately $2 to $2.50 per cubic  foot  of diges-
ter capacity.   In the Chicago Sanitary  District, total  annual  costs of
digestion and lagooning of activated sludge with 3.5% solids are reported
at $26 per dry ton (Lynam, et al..  1965);  sludge thickening  and  digestion
account for about 53% of these  costs.   Digestion costs  vary  widely with
the degree of sludge concentration  achieved by the preceding thickening
process.
                                V-10

-------
     Burd (1968) conducted a literature review and reported that the
cost of anaerobic digestion alone should be $5 to $18 per dry ton per
year.  A study conducted in Westchester County, New York, revealed
that the capital cost for a standard-rate (low temperature) digestion
system is about 2.5 times that for a high-rate (mesophilic) system of
equal capacity.  According to Stanley Consultants (1972), the total an-
nual high-rate digestion costs, including capital, operation and main-
tenance amortized over 20 years at an interest rate of 7%, are approxi-
mately $8 per dry ton for a plant handling more than 500 dry tons of
sludge daily (1972 dollars).  The operating and maintenance costs for
this plant size were $2 per dry ton per year.

     Fuel gas produced by anaerobic digesters can be used to heat
buildings and digesters, and sometimes for power production at the
plant.  The poor-quality supernatant liquid in the high-rate diges-
ter, which is pumped back to the head of the sewage treatment plant,
frequently reduces overall treatment plant efficiency.  This indirectly
affects the environment of receiving streams.

     Heated anaerobic digestion at the MSDGC West-Southwest plant
brings about an 80 to 85% reduction of solids in the sludge.  Most
of the digested material is converted to water, carbon dioxide, me-
thane, some hydrogen sulfide, and other gaseous compounds.  These
gases are burned to heat the digesters, and combustion products are
released to the atmosphere.  Most of these are water and carbon diox-
ide, but sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides are also generated.  The
concentration of hydrogen sulfide may corrode heat-recovery equipment
and require the use of a stack scrubber.   Therefore, air pollution can-
not be overlooked as a potential impact.

2.   Imhoff Digestion

     The Imhoff tank removes settleable and suspended solids by sedi-
mentation, and liquifies, gasifies, and stabilizes the organic matter
in the resulting sludge by bacterial  digestion.  All of these processes
                               V-ll

-------
are accomplished in the same tank,  without  contaminating  the  settling
sludge with products of sludge digestion (Beaumont,  1929).   The tank
is a two-story structure containing three compartments:   the  upper
flow-through or sedimentation compartment;  the lower sludge digestion
chamber; and the gas vent and scum chamber  which surrounds  the upper
compartment.

     The sewage first flows through the upper compartment;  solids
settle to the sloping bottom, slide down, and pass through  a  slot
which prevents the entrance of gas  or digesting sludge in the lower
section.  The gas and rising sludge particles below  are  diverted to
the gas vent and scum chamber.  In  a properly working tank, the gases
generated should contain about 60 to 80% methane and 15%  carbon diox-
ide.  Digested sludge is drawn by pumps and is usually air-dried on
sand beds.

     Imhoff tanks provide sedimentation and sludge digestion  in
one unit and should produce a satisfactory  effluent  with  40 to 60%
reduction of suspended solids and a 25 to 35% reduction  in  BOD, depend-
ing on sewage characteristics and retention time.   With  a 2 to 3-hour
detention time in the sedimentation compartment,  100% removal  of the
settleable solids and 60% removal of the total suspended  solids is
quite common.  Since the Imhoff tank has no mechanical parts, it is
relatively easy and economical to operate.   However, routine  cleaning
and maintenance of the tank are essential for successful  operation.

     Maintenance routines include daily removal of grease,  scum, and
floating solids from the sedimentation compartment;  weekly  scraping of
the sides and sloping bottom of the sedimentation chamber is  also neces-
sary.  Scum in the scum chamber must be broken up and removed if its
depth attains 2 to 3 feet.  Sludge must be  removed from  the digestion
chamber before its level rises within 18 inches of the slot in the sedi-
mentation compartment.
                                V-12

-------
     Foaming is a frequent problem associated with Imhoff digestion,
especially in new tanks.  Foaming is a result of poor digestion which
can be caused by adverse sewage characteristics (e.g., toxic substances),
temperature and pH value, all of which affect bacterial  action.  Foam-
ing can be relieved by limiting, heating the tank during winter, chlor-
inating the influent sewage, cracking the scum to vent gas, and seeding
the tank with well-digested sludge (Beaumont, 1929 and Murphy,  1931).

     The operating and maintainance costs of Imhoff digestion are low
except when chemicals such as lime or chlorine are used.  Since the in-
vention of separate mechanical  clarifier and digestion units and the
activated sludge process, the installation of Imhoff tanks has  dimin-
ished.  Construction or capital cost data are therefore generally un-
available.  When the third battery of 36 Imhoff tanks was built in
1935 at Chicago's West Side Sewage Treatment Plant, the construction
cost was $2,700,000 for a capacity of 204 MGD.  Including the previous
two batteries of tanks, the total  capacity was estimated to be  472 MGD
(Streeter, 1935).  The capital  cost was approximately $17,000 per MGD
as compared to $28,000 per MGD for the then proposed Southwest  Side
Plant, an activated sludge plant with anaerobic digesters.

     Environmental effects associated with Imhoff digestion are odors,
attraction of flies, and possible risks of explosion.  Chlorination
of influent sewage and proper operation of Imhoff tanks can avoid most
odor and fly problems.  Collection of digestion gases and utilization
for space heating or power generation can yield revenues while  conserv-
ing energy.  Explosions from the ignition of gas pockets in the Imhoff
tanks or gas collection systems can be a serious hazard.  However,  ex-
plosions are rare if adequate safety precautions are taken.  Some safety
practices include isolation of gas lines, insulation of sources of igni-
tion, routine investigation of leaks, and proper venting of gas accumu-
lations (Nagel, 1941).

3.   Incineration

     Dewatered sludge cakes from vacuum filters and centrifuges can be
sterilized and reduced in volume by incineration.   Incineration destroys

                               V-13

-------
organic matter in the sludge and dewaters the sludge by evaporation.
The two types of incinerators most applicable to sewage sludge are
multiple hearth and fluidized bed incinerators.

     The multiple hearth furnace consists of a circular steel  shell
surrounding a number of stacked-up solid refractory hearths.   Partially
dewatered sludge is continuously fed to the upper hearths, where the
sludge is heated and vaporized at roughly 1,000°F.   Openings  in each
hearth allow sludge particles to crop to the next lower hearth.  A
high-temperature combustion zone between 1,600 and 1,800°F is  formed in
the intermediate hearth, where volatile gases and solids are  burned.
The bottom hearth serves as a cooling zone.  Fly ash is removed from
the exhaust gases by wet scrubbers.

     The fluidized bed incinerator consists of a combustion reactor
or bed of fluidized sand which is supported by upward-moving  air.  In-
timate contact between the sludge particles and oxygen is achieved by
rapid mixing of the fluidized sand grains.  Because of the large sur-
face area provided by the sand particles, heat exchange between gases
and solids is extremely rapid.  Sludge is burned in the combustion zone
at 1,400 to  1,500°F.  Auxiliary fuel is usually required when secon-
dary sludge  is burned.  However, after start-up, dewatered raw pri-
mary sludge  can be burned without this supplementary fuel.  The resi-
dual ash particles are removed from  the reactor by the upward move-
ment of combustion gases.  Ash parti Ices are removed from the gas
phase by wet scrubbers.

     From  the  study of a model city  with 100,000 people contributing
2,530 tons of  solids per year, the capital and operating costs for
multiple hearth incineration  are given in Table V-l.  The total an-
nual capital,  operating and maintenance costs for a plant handling
more than  500  dry  tons of  sludge per day are less than $15 per dry
ton, based on  the  1972 dollar (Stanley Consultants, 1972).
                               V-14

-------
 Table V-l.    Annual  Capital  and Operating Costs for Multiple
              Hearth  Incineration (Quirk,  1964)
                      (dollars per ton of dry solids)
                           Incineration Without    Incineration With
                              Deodorization          Deodorization
     Capital  Cost                 $ 9.15                $ 9.47
     Operating Cost               $ 6.36                $ 9.50
     Total Annual Costs           $15.51                $18.97
     The annual capital and operating costs reported for fluidized  bed
incineration at Lynnwood, Washington, ranged from $26 to $35 for systems
serving populations of 22,000 and 8,000, respectively (Alberston, 1965).
At the East Cliff Sanitary District Plant, California, operating costs
of approximately $25 per dry ton per year were reported (Sohr et.al.,
1965).

     Variables in the cost of sludge incineration are:

          •    Nature of the sludge
          •    Amount and type of chemicals used in sludge
               conditioning before mechanical  dewatering
          •    Degree of mechanical dewatering
          •    Costs of fuel, water and power
          •    Extent of air pollution control required
          •    Size and design of the treatment plant.

     Environmental considerations for incineration are centered around
air and water pollution.  Air pollutant emissions include particulates,
odors, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and volatile trace metals such
                               V-15

-------
as mercury.  Wet scrubbers are efficient in removing fly ash but in-
effective in capturing hazardous sub-micron particles (diameters be-
tween 0.1 and 1.0 millionth of a meter can lodge permanently in the
lung).  The wastewater from the scrubbers requires treatment to avoid
water pollution problems.

     Odor problems associated with incineration are of constant con-
cern.  Incomplete combustion or partial  breakdown of organic volatile
molecules is the major cause of odor.   Maintaining an exit temperature
of 1,200 to 1,500°F is effective in destroying odorants.   This measure,
however, requires auxiliary fuel and burners.   Volatile trace metals
which escape the scrubbers have some adverse impact on the environment.
Economical means for removal of these emissions are not available.   The
relatively high fuel consumption for incineration, as opposed to other
sludge processing methods, creates an impact on the environment and non-
renewable resources.

4.   Heat Drying

     Heat drying removes moisture from sludge, thereby providing for
efficient incineration.  Heat drying also prepares sludge for conversion
into fertilizer.  Drying is necessary in fertilizer manufacture to  permit
grinding and to reduce the weight of the sludge.

     Dewatered sludge is mixed with dry sludge to reduce moisture con-
tent and particle size.  The mixture is then fed into a flash drying sys-
tem.  In the system, sludge is passed through a high-temperature-and-
turbulence zone for a few seconds, reducing the moisture content to ap-
proximately 10/o.  Heat-dried sludge is separated from the gaseous phase
in a cyclone separator.  Afterburners at a temperature of 1 ,400°p or
higher are frequently required to deodorize stack emissions.

     A study of the economic aspects of heat drying in a medium size
plant, handling 2,530 dry tons per year, revealed that the annual capi-
tal and operating costs approximate $37 per dry ton with stack gas  de-
odorization and $29 per dry ton without deodorization (Quirk, 1964).
These costs do not account for the sale of dried sludge as fertilizer
or as a soil conditioner.
                              V-16

-------
     Heat drying consumes more fuel than incineration processes.  It
also contributes to air pollution by emitting suspended particulates,
nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and trace metals.  However, heat drying
has less air pollution potential  than does conventional  incineration,
which requires higher combustion temperatures.  Cost of air pollution
abatement of exhaust gases can be substantial.

5.   Wet Air Oxidation

     The wet air oxidation process oxidizes sludge solids  in  an aque-
ous phase under heat and pressure.  The commercialized application of
the process has also been called the Zimmerman process or  Zimpro.   The
system consists of a heater, compressor, storage tank, reactor, and li-
quid-and-solids separator.  Ground, thickened sludge is  preheated, pres-
surized and combined with pressurized air,  and then introduced to  the
bottom of the reactor.  Chemical  oxidation of organic solids  occurs as
the mixture follows a baffled path through the reactor.  Carbonaceous
organic matter is oxidized to carbon dioxide and water,  organic nitro-
gen compounds are converted to ammonia, and sulfur becomes sulfate.
After oxidation, the residual ash is separated from the  liquid phase.

     Wet oxidation plant residues or ash are high in ammonia  and vola-
tile acids.  The biological oxygen demand (BOD)  in the process effluent
varies between 5,400 and 8,400 ppm.   The ash can be dewatered satis-
factorily by vacuum filtration or centrifugation without chemical  condi-
tioning or aids.  Use of anionic polyelectrolytes certainly improves
dewatering by centrifugation.

     Data from Zimpro pilot-plant operations in  the MSDGC  indicated that
90% of the organic matter in sewage sludge can be oxidized at 500°F and
1,200 psig (gage pressure).  It was also concluded that  if the feed so-
lids concentration is high enough, sufficient thermal  energy  can be re-
covered to operate the entire wet oxidation process (Sanitary Engineer-
ing Committee Report, 1959).
                                V-17

-------
     The annual capital  and operating  costs  of wet  air oxidation  in
the MSDGC, providing a 70 to 80% reduction of chemical  oxygen  demand
(COD), varied from $34 to $38 per dry  ton of sludge (Ettelt and  Ken-
nedy, 1966).   Operating costs for the  Blind  Brook Treatment Plant at
Rye, New York were reported at $26.80  per dry ton (Harding  and Griffin,
1965).

     Failure of the wet air oxidation  system can create severe occu-
pational health hazards because the system  is operated under more than
80 atmospheres of pressure.  The process  effluent,  which is high  in
nitrogen, is recycled back to the head of the treatment plant.  This
causes nitrogen to accumulate in the plant,  raising the nitrogen  level
in the plant effluent and reducing plant  performance.   The  final  conse-
quence of this occurrence is an increased degradation  of water quality
in receiving streams.  Accumulation of nitrogen after  the introduction
of wet air oxidation in the Chicago Sanitary District  has been docu-
mented by Dal ton and Murphy (1973).
                               V-18

-------
C.     SLUDGE DISPOSAL SUBSYSTEMS

      In most cases, stabilized sludge is disposed of underground or on  land.
 In areas where the ocean provides vast dilution capacity,  it is  the ultimate
 dumping site.   The most frequently applied methods of sludge disposal are
 sanitary landfilling, lagooning, and ocean dumping.   The operation  of each,
 its reliability, unit cost, and environmental  implications are discussed be-
 low.

      1.   Sanitary Landfill

           The American Society of Civil Engineers defines  sanitary  landfill
      as:
           A method of disposing of refuse on land without creating  nui-
           sances or hazards to public health or safety,  by utilizing  the
           principles of engineering to confine the refuse to the smallest
           practical area, to reduce it to the smallest practical  volume,
           and to cover it with a layer of earth at the conclusion of  each
           day's operation, or at such more frequent intervals as may  be
           necessary.
      In a true sanitary landfill, waste are deposited in a designated  area,
      compacted in place with a tractor or roller,  and covered with  12  inches
      of clean soil.

           Sanitary landfill can be used for disposal  of sludge,  grease and
      grit, stabilized or not, if a suitable site is available.   The landfill
      is most beneficial if it is also used for disposal of refuse and  other
      solid wastes.  Liquid sludge acts as a wetting agent which  increases
      compaction of the landfill; sludge cake or incineration  ash mixed with
      refuse increases the density.  Sanitary landfills can be divided  into
      two major categories — area landfills, which are on relatively flat
      terrain, and depression landfills, which utilize natural  or man-made
      depressions in  the landscape such as a quarry or gravel  pit.

           Sanitary landfills have traditionally operated at low  unit cost.
      Capital costs for a landfill include investment  in land,  site  facilities,
      and equipment.   A general  capital cost cannot be estimated  because of
                                     V-19

-------
the wide variability in land prices.   Annual  operating  costs  for sani-
tary landfills were reported to  vary  between  $0.50  and  $2.00  per wet
ton (Stone, 1962).   These  figures  are very  low  compared to  other land-
fill data.   Therefore,  overall costs  are  largely  determined by  hauling
costs and land prices.   Excluding  land investment,  the  total  capital,
operating and maintenance  costs  are estimated to  range  downward from
$1.80 to $1.20 per  wet  ton of sludge  per  year for operations  of 1,000
to 10,000 wet tons  per  day,  respectively  (Stanley Consultants,  1972).
Increased emphasis  on environmental effects may elevate costs of sani-
tary landfills.

     Poor management of sanitary landfills  can  result in adverse envi-
ronmental effects.   Dewatered sludge  and  other  solid wastes in  landfills
degrade chemically  and  biologically to produce  solid, liquid, and gas-
eous products.  Microbiological  decomposition of  landfill material ini-
tially occurs aerobically, and then anaerobically when  oxygen is de-
pleted.  Characteristic waste products of aerobic decomposition are
carbon dioxide, water,  nitrate,  and nitrite.  Migration  or  leaching  of
nitrate and nitrite can cause groundwater contamination. Typical  pro-
ducts of anaerobic  decomposition are  methane, carbon dioxide, water,
organic acids, nitrogen, ammonia,  inorganic salts,  and  hydrogen sul-
fide.  Some of these products are  odorous.  Acidic  products can lower
the pH value of the landfill  and cause mobilization of  trace  metals
which may affect the quality of  surface and groundwater. Nuisance con-
ditions such as odors and  flies  can be minimized  with daily coverage of
the waste, but cannot be avoided altogether.

     In most areas, available land conveniently located is  becoming
increasingly scarce and old sanitary  landfills  are  now  being  used for
development.  In general,  this reuse  was  not  contemplated during the
construction of the original  fill. Uneven  settlement and poor  bear-
ing strength of fill materials present foundation problems  which signi-
ficantly increase construction costs.  Total  failure of structures built
on  landfill sites has been reported.   Therefore,  it may be  desirable to
build landfills so that future development  can  be undertaken  at reason-
able cost  (Sowers,  1968).
                              V-20

-------
2.   Lagooning

     Lagooning has been the most popular sludge disposal  method for
industrial wastewater treatment plants; lagoons are also  used at muni-
cipal  plants.  Lagooning can be used as a contingency method  of sludge
handling and storage while other sludge processes are temporarily over-
loaded or out of service.  Lagoons can be divided into three  classes:
thickening, storage, and digestion lagoons; drying lagoons; and per-
manent lagoons.

     Digestion of sludge in the first type of lagoon is a lengthy pro-
cess which creates multiple nuisance problems.   Drying lagoons cer-
tainly compete with the use of sand drying beds.    The sludge must be
digested before entering the lagoon.  Removal of dried sludge, which
must be disposed of by other means, is necessary to maintain  the effec-
tive capacity of a drying lagoon.  Multiple units and supernatant de-
canting devices are required in the first two types of lagoons, as the
supernatant is always returned to the head of the plant.   A permanent
lagoon, one from which the sludge is never removed, is an ultimate dis-
posal  site similar in function to sanitary landfills and  has  proven to
be the most economical method of sludge disposal  where suitable sites
still  exist.

     Variables in lagooning operations are land availability, climate,
subsoil permeability, groundwater table elevation, sludge characteris-
tics,  and sludge loading rates.  Land available adjacent  to the treat-
ment plant substantially reduces sludge hauling costs. Good  climatic
conditions, which enhance evaporation of sludge water, are necessary
for efficient performance.  Soil permeability and groundwater eleva-
tion affect lagoon performance by determining the rate of drainage
and the potential for groundwater contamination.   Raw sludge  generally
requires less lagoon capacity than digested sludge.  One  cubic foot
of lagoon can handle 6 Ibs  of raw sludge per year as compared to 2.3
Ibs of digested sludge per year.

-------
     Construction costs of sewage stabilization ponds in the Midwest
were reported to vary between $1,000 and $3,000 or more per acre.   La-
goons constructed in depression areas can be significantly cheaper
(Howells and Dubois, 1959).  Excluding land investment, the construc-
tion costs of lagoons were estimated to range downward from $28.62
to $12.70 a year per acre-foot for lagoon capacities of 10 and 100
acre-feet, respectively.  The costs are amortized using a 7% discount
rate over 20 years and are based on the 1972 dollar (Stanley Consul-
tants, 1972).

     Literature reviews show that the operating and maintenance costs
of sludge lagooning range from $1.00 to $3.50 per dry ton of sludge per
year (Bubbis, 1962, Caron, 1964, Burd, 1968).   In 1972 dollars,  the
annual operating and maintenance costs were reported by Stanley Con-
sultants to be approximately $5.00 per dry ton for a plant producing
100 dry tons of sludge per day.  Costs will increase ff the sludge is
transported  long distances for lagooning.

     Lagooning of raw sludge creates nuisance problems such as odor
emission and insect infestation.  Nuisance problems associated with
lagooning of digested sludge are less severe.  To minimize these prob-
lems, adequate buffer distances must be provided between the lagoons
and the nearest sensitive receptors.  Seepage and percolation of sludge
water through permeable soil may present groundwater pollution prob-
lems.  Lining the lagoon can prevent groundwater contamination, but this
will increase both initial and operating costs; artifical drainage may
be required  due to loss of subsoil drainage.

3.   Ocean Dumping

     Ocean disposal of industrial and municipal sewage sludge has  been
commonly adopted by municipalities close to the sea.  Some of the  largest
cities in the United States, including Boston, New York, Philadelphia,
and Los Angeles, dispose of their sludge in this fashion.  Ocean disposal
                                V-22

-------
has proven to be economical and effective as the ocean initially pro-
vides a 1,000 to 5,000-fold dilution.  Barging of sludge to the ocean
is considered to be economically justifiable where round-trip distances
range up to 400 miles or more.  Design and operating factors in ocean
disposal are constrained by oceanic currents, mixing characteristics,
and ebbing tides.

     Of the two methods of ocean disposal — pipeline or barge, pipe-
line disposal is cheaper where transportation distance is short.  For
example, annual operating costs for the sludge outfall line at the Los
Angeles Hyperion Plant were expected to be $1.15 per dry ton of sludge.
New York City has been barging digested sludge 25 miles into the ocean
for many years.  By using larger and more mechanized barges and unloading
sludge into the ocean more rapidly, New York City has been able to re-
duce sludge handling costs to $7.50 per dry ton (Burd, 1968).  Phila-
delphia estimated barging costs to be $8.78 per dry ton of secondary
sludge at 10% solids with a round trip travel distance of 227 miles
(Baxter, 1959).  The annual capital and operating costs of barging
for the Blue Plains Treatment Plant at Washington, D.C., based on a
400-mile round trip, were estimated to be $17.95 per dry ton of sludge
at 7.5% solids (Burd, 1968).  A recent study of ocean disposal of di-
gested sewage sludge having 10% solids revealed that costs of barging
range downward from $0.32 per dry ton per mile for distances of 15
miles to $0.11 per dry ton per mile for distances of 150 miles or more
(Shea and Stockton, 1975).

     Ocean dumping of raw sludge is rare, because numerous nuisance
problems result.  Potential damage to marine environment and ecology
resulting from ocean disposal of stabilized sludge has drawn increas-
ing public concern.  A Corps of Engineers study of the New York City
sludge disposal grounds indicated that, because of high bacterial  con-
tamination in surf clams found adjacent to the disposal  site, harvesting
of clams should be prohibited within a 6-mile radium of its center (Smith
and Brown, 1971).  Of particular concern is the possibility that surf
                                 V-23

-------
clams may accumulate and concentrate bacteria,  viruses,  and toxic sub-
stances found in sludge.   These contaminants  could,  in  turn, be biomag-
nified in food chains through  consumption  of  the  shellfish.   Although ocean
dumping is economically favorable  for coastal communities,  environmental
effects must be taken into consideration,  especially as  regulations on
ocean disposal become more stringent (Ocean Dumping Act).
                              V-24

-------
0-   SLUDGE UTILIZATION SUBSYSTEMS

     Sludge utilization embraces the recovery of useful  material  from sew-
age sludge and recycling of sludge nutrients by fertilizing farm  or forest
lands, including the reclamation of mining spoil.   Utilization of sludge is
becoming more attractive and acceptable than disposal  because it  offers cheap
substitutes for costly non-renewable resources while avoiding many of the
increasing costs and environmental risks of disposal.   Three methods of
sludge utilization are recognized:  fertilizer production,  composting, and
soil reclamation.  Each method is reviewed below.

     1.    Fertilizer Production

          Sewage sludge has been used as fertilizer and soil conditioner
     for many years.  The use of liquid sludge has been rather limited be-
     cause of handling difficulty, but dried sludge reduces this  problem
     significantly.  Preparation of these sludge products can be  achieved
     by air drying on sand beds, mechanical dewatering,  or heat drying, as
     discussed in Sections A.  and B.  of this  chapter.

          The value of sludge fertilizer is determined by nitrogen, carbon,
     phosphorous, and potassium contents.  Hence,  the  value of sludge as a
     fertilizer is limited because of low concentrations of nitrogen, phos-
     phoric acid, and potash.  However, the high content of organic material
     in sewage sludge provides for excellent soil  conditioning.  The phos-
     phorous content of municipal sewage sludge was significantly increased
     with the use of phosphate detergents (Anderson, 1956).  Of course, this
     may not be as true currently because of the development of low-phosphate
     detergents.  Of particular interest to agronomists is  the carbon-nitrogen
     ratio of sewage sludge.  A study of sludge characteristics in five muni-
     cipalities indicated that the nitrogen content ranged  from 2.0 to 6.0%;
     carbon 21 to 47%; phosphoric oxide 1.0 to 11%; ash content 24 to 53%;
     and humus 33 to 41% (Anderson, 1956).  In general,  digested  sludge has
     a lower fertilizer value because the nitrogen content  is reduced 40 to
     50% by the digestion process.
                                    V-25

-------
     In the past, many treatment plants with heat drying equipment
converted from fertilizer production to sludge incineration  or land-
filling, because the sludge fertilizer market could not be success-
fully developed.  This trend has been reversed recently because of
the high-energy demands of incineration and the scarcity of  landfill
sites.   Based on potential sales revenues and the concept of recycling
nutrients, fertilizer production may gain more public acceptance.   For
example, Milwaukee, Chicago and Houston have successfully marketed
large quantities of heat-dried activated sludge for many years.  The
price has depended on the nitrogen content of the sludge and has varied
from $12 to $18 per ton (Burd, 1968).  Over 200,000 tons each year were
sold by these cities for application to crops, golf courses, and park
land.  However, most cities have donated sludge dried on sand beds in
order to dispose of it off the plant site.

     The major environmental concerns over the utilization of sludge
as fertilizer or soil conditioner deal with possible health  hazards
from pathogenic microorganisms and trace metals and non-point source
water pollution.  Pathogenic microorganisms are destroyed by heat
drying, but pathogens in air-dried or mechanically dewatered sludge
might contact food plants or fodder and be ingested by humans or live-
stock.   Trace metals such as zinc, nickel, copper, cadmium,  lead, chro-
mium, and mercury may be selectively concentrated or biomagnified
through the food chain, presenting health problems to domestic animals
and man.

     Uncontrolled application of dried-sludge fertilizer may also con-
tribute to non-point source water pollution, which is extremely diffi-
cult to confine and regulate.  When assessing the benefits of stabi-
lized sludge used as fertilizer, potential consequences to the envir-
onment must be weighed.  Perhaps controlled distribution, mandatory
sterilization, and limitation of dried-sludge fertilizer application
to plant species having low rates of uptake and concentration of harm-
ful substances would render this waste product safe enough.   The costs
                              V-26

-------
of pre-treatment or advanced treatment of industrial wastewater, us-
ing carbon adsorption or other means to remove heavy metals, might be
offset by the increased value of safe sludge fertilizer.

2.   Composting

     Composting is defined as the aerobic thermophilic decomposition
of organic wastes to a relatively stable humus by microorganisms.  The
product of composting can be used as a soil conditioner.  Traditionally,
composting has been used to stabilize solid refuse.  Sewage sludge has
only occasionally been used in solid refuse composting.  Composting
systems generally fall into three categories:  pile, windrow, and mech-
anized or enclosed systems.

     Composting consists of three stages; namely mixing, composting
and maturing.  Solid refuse is sorted by screening and magnetic sepa-
ration, and is pulverized in a grinder.  Sewage sludge is then mixed
with the pulverized refuse.  The mixture is placed in windrows, pits,
or silos for decomposition and stabilization.  The compost row or pile
is normally turned daily for 2 weeks or longer with a composter, except
during periods of rain.  Under proper composting conditions, tempera-
tures in the windrow range from 130 to 150°F, falling into the thermo-
philic range wherein the rate of decomposition is the highest.  The
heat generated as a result of thermophilic microbial oxidation creates
a convection current, supplying air to the microorganisms.  High temp-
erature also can provide for efficient destruction of pathogenic organ-
isms and weed seeds.  For efficient composting, the optimum pH of the
material should be neutral.

     After decomposition, the compost row or pile is flattened for fur-
ther drying.  Material removed from the composting system is cured for
at least 30 days, which provides further stabilization.  Besides solid
refuse, other bulking agents such as sawdust, shredded paper, or wood
chips can be used for sludge composting.
                               V-27

-------
     The Agricultural Research Service at Beltsville,  Maryland, has
studied sludge composting for several  years.   The capacity of the com-
post site is approximately 100 to 150  wet tons per day.   Their exper-
ience suggests that the major problems associated with the operation
are adverse weather conditions and odors.  The study concluded that
the annual capital  and operating costs for composting  200 wet tons per
day of digested sludge with 20% solids is approximately  $7.31 per wet
ton or $30.00 per dry ton of sludge.   The operating cost alone accounts
for $4.10 per wet ton or $16.80 per dry ton.   Wood chips contribute
over $2 per wet ton to the costs, most of which is for hauling.  The
cost estimate does  not consider benefits from sale of  the product (Ep-
stein and Willson,  1974).  Rodale and  Scott reported that compost had
been sold for $2.00 to $90.00 per ton  (Burd,  1968).   The smaller figure
was the price of large quantities of raw compost; the  large figure was
the price for small specialty markets  such as gardens  and golf courses.

     The environmental problems associated with composting are odors
and attraction of insects.  Odor nuisance seems to outweigh insect
problems.  If the compost system is too large, dense,  or wet, anaero-
bic conditions may  set in and produce  undesirable odors.  Enclosing
the system is beneficial but increases costs.  Distributing composting
products as soil conditioners provides revenue, but may  cause the
same environmental  problems as pertain to fertilizer production, dis-
cussed previously in this chapter.

3.   Soil Reclamation

     Application of liquid sludge to land is  a practice  dating back
to antiquity, especially in England (Benarde, 1973).  In the United
States, disposal of sewage effluent or digested sludge on farmland has
not been widely practiced, due partly  to the past availability of in-
expensive and conveniently handled inorganic fertilizer.  However,
higher costs and environmental risks with other methods  of sludge dis-
posal are making them less attractive.  This  fact prompts many waste-
water management organizations to seriously consider the alternative of
land application.
                                V-28

-------
     St. Mary's, Pennsylvania, has disposed of digested sludge on
hay fields, pasture, corn stubble and athletic fields.  The applica-
tion rate for pasture is about 64 wet tons per acre per year with
3.7% solids.  Raw sewage from Muskegon, Michigan is pumped to a series
of aerated lagoons.  The effluent from the lagoons, whose quality is
equivalent to that from secondary treatment, is sprayed on farmland.
The projected capacity of the system is 43.4 MGD, including an indus-
trial flow of 24 MGD (Chaiken, Poloncsik, and Wilson, 1973).

     Digested sludge has normally been utilized for land application,
because raw primary and activated sludges decompose and create a nui-
sance.   Liquid digested sludge can be applied to fields by spraying,
soil incorporation, soil injection, ridge and furrow irrigation, and
infiltration by shallow impoundment.   Each method has specific advan-
tages and disadvantages in terms of workability, reliability, and en-
vironmental effects.  A detailed discussion is presented in Chapter
VII.  Transportation of sludge to the application site can be accom-
plished by tank truck, railroad tank car, enclosed barge, or pipeline,
depending upon transport availability, site location, and cost-effec-
tiveness.  Detailed discussions of transportation are presented in the
following section.

     The rate of sludge application to land is determined by a number
of factors, including climate, topography, hydrology, and soil and
sludge characteristics.  Literature review indicates that a wide
range of application rates up to several hundred dry tons per acre
per year have benefitted soil and crop growth (Table V-2).  Upper
limits are not yet recognized; ultimately they will be determined by
the build-up of nutrients and heavy metals in the soils.

     The economics of land application have not been fully investi-
gated.   The process recycles inexpensive and useful organic and in-
organic materials back to the land, conserves non-renewable resources
such as inorganic fertilizers, and eliminates costly sludge thickening
and dewatering.   The capital costs for land application include land
                                V-29

-------
o

CM


  ri

 o
•i—
a

T3

 re

 en
co
to
CTl
"O
 S-
CO
 cu
 re
Qi
 c
 o




















CU Ul
•I-5 "O
re -r-
•r- O
X 00
o
s- >>
Q. S-
O-Q

O)
+->
E ui
•r- T3
X •!-
O i—
S- 0
Q-OO
Q.
<






Ul
\/
S-
re
E
CU
C£








CT
C
•1—
-o
re
o
_i

c
0
re
s-
i_>
c
cu
u
c
o
cu
^ N
Ul O T-
c: -t-> i —
O T-

c: s_
un cu cu
CM i — 4-
re
• " > , —
o •!- re
en zs -r-
-o cu cr o
C T- 0) S-
re Q cu
•— cu E
en c s- E
c re o o
uj oo re u
^. *
.>> LO
O) pj O
S- ^ 0
O i —
re i
\ o

0 "~



f — s
a« o in
*~-* • •
^J" to




o -
+-> in
re
JZ. CU
en s_
•r- re
c^
r^
• ^ f.
re re
••- 4-
c: c
S- •!-
o re
4- 5-
•r—
•— S
re o
0 r—

•K
o
o
OO
i
o
o





1
1











•
>^
f—
cu
>
>r.
+J
o
cu
Q.
Ul
CU
S-



















1
cu
s_

"O

re


. r<
O
en
CU
•r—
d

c
re
OO

*
o
0
0
r>
1 	






1
1














.
C
o
•r—
+J
re
E
re
r^
0


















1
CU
-d

r^
r—
CU
S

• ^
re

c:
re
>
P—
>^
Ul
c:
c
cu
D_
*
O
00









r—
•
•3-



T3
CU
+J
i-
0
Q-
CU
S-

>^

c
o
E
E
o
o

s
o
1 —




















•
Ul
cu
+J
re
s_

c
o

+->
re
u
•i —
, —
Q-
CL
re


















0 S
U O

re cu
•r- .Q
c
re i —

i— CU
>> S
Ul
c: ••>
c in
cu cu
D- •!-
4^
CU -r-
c c:
•i — Z5
^: E
-X
o
CM









1
1




1
Q.
re

•a
cu •

1- CU
O 4->
a. re
cu s_
S-
c
>> o

c: -t->
o re
E U
E ••""
O r—
U Q-


















                                                                                                                   Ul *-

                                                                                                                   1§
                                                                                                                            -a  re
                                                                                                                             c  s-
                                                                                                                             re  o

                                                                                                                             ui  re
                                                                                                                             c 4-
                                                                                                                             re
                                                                                                                             cu -o
                                                                                                                            _Q  CU
                                                                                                                   CD
                                                                                                                      CU
                                                                                                                   cL>
                                                                                                                   OO "3
                                                   o c
                                                   ui O
                                                      Q.
                                                   •" Ul
                                                   o cu
                                                   en s_
                                                   re
                                                   o c
                                                  •r- S_
                                                  -C O
                                                  o o
                                                                                                                            en
                                                                                                                            CM
                                                                                                                             i
                                                                                                                            co
                                                                                                                   o

                                                                                                                   ID
                                                                                                                            o

                                                                                                                            ro
                                                                                                                                      cu

                                                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                                                      re
 re
 u
 Q.
 Q.
 CU
 en
-a
 cu
 cu
 en



cu
en
-o
zs
i —
OO

4-
O

CD
a.
>,
1—



cu
en
T3
3
>>•—
S_ ui
re
E TJ
•i- CU
S- +->
Q. «
>
•a -i-
01 +->
•!-> 0
ui re
cu
cn~o
•r- SZ
Q re




>>
s-
re
E
•r—
i-
Q.

T3
CU
+J CU
ui en
a> TS
en zi
•i — r-~
d io












-a
QJ
•4->
Ul
cu
CD
•r—
Q
                                                                          T3
                                                                          O)
                                                                          +J
                                                                          Ul
                                                                          CU
                                                                          en
                                                                                    re
          s_
          Q.

         •a
          ai
         -M ai
          ui en
          cu -o
          en n

         Q Ul
             -a
             c s-
             re o

             >, cu
             S- en ui
             re T3 13
             E zs E
             •1-1 — Z!
             S- Ul -E
             Q.
                -a en
             -a cu c
             cu +j ••-
             •(-> re i—
             ui > -^
             cu -i- o
                                                                                                                   cu
                                                                                                                   en
                                                                                                                   T3
                                                                                                                S- Ul
                                                                                                                re
                                                                                                                E -a
                                                                                                                •i- CU
                                                                                                                s- -u
                                                                                                                a. re
 cu +->
4J  U
 ui  re
 cu
                                                                                                ••- o  s-
                                                                                                Q re -i-"
                                                                                                                   c:
                                                                                                                   re
T3
 O)
+J
 in
 cu
 en
                                                             cu


                                                             re

                                                             ui
o
Ul
CM
  I
                                       en
                                                 in
                                                 LO
                                                 CM
                                                             m
                                                             ai
o
UD
CM
VD
CTl
in
UD
CM
CO
UD
CM
CU
CL
CU
 cu
r—

 re


cu
o
c
cu
s-
cu
q 	
CU
a:



-a
o
o
3:

•a
c
re
-f
re
Ul
s_
cu










N
S-
cu
-P SZ
re o in
4-> -r- T3
00 4-> S-
zi re
re i — o
•r- r- 33
C O
S- Q- i—
O O
4- J- S-
•r- CU +->
i— +J C
re re o
030
o
o
o

-a
j^
re

E

re
o
U)
ZI
'2^









r—
a>
4-
^~
o

                                                                                                                cu
                                                                                                                a.

                                                                                                                cu
                                                                                                                o
                                                                                                                             Ul
                                                                                                                             O
                                                                                                                            OO

                                                                                                                            -a
                                                                                                                             c
                                                                                                                             re
                                                                                                                             Ul
                                                                                                                             cu
                                                                                                                                       re

                                                                                                                                      4-
                                                                                                                                       o


                                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                                       re
                                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                                      -a
                                                                                                                                       c
                                                                                                                                      o

                                                                                                                                      *~
                                                                  V-30

-------
acquisition, access roads and fencing, site grading, sludge stor-
age facilities, distribution systems, and application equipment.
Operating costs include sludge transportation, sludge application
and crop cultivation.  Systems to monitor and control environmental
effects further add to costs, and should be accounted for and weighed
against those for other alternatives for sludge disposal  or utiliza-
tion.  Table V-3 presents reported unit costs associated  with land
spreading of sludge.

     The wide range in costs is due to the various hauling distances
reported in each of the studies.  The construction cost,  amortized
capital cost, operating and maintenance cost, and total  costs exclud-
ing land amortized at 7% over 20 years are presented in  Figure V-l,
based on the 1972 dollar.  For a project capacity of 1,000 dry tons
per day, the total annual cost is approximately $7 per dry ton of
sludge.

     The major problem associated with land application  is public
acceptance.  Potential environmental problems include transmission
of odors and airborne pathogens, build-up of nutrients and heavy
metals in the soils, surface water and groundwater contamination,
and biomagnification of toxic substances in food chains or transfer
of pathogens by ingestion,  if agricultural  produce is raised  on the
application fields.  Proper choice and control of sludge  application
methods, rates and periods, and proper monitoring and pollution con-
trol should eliminate or minimize some of these environmental problems
A complete examination of potential adverse environmental and health
effects and the available mitigating measures follows in  Chapters VII
and VIII and IX.
                               V-31

-------
         Table V-3.    Land  Spreading Costs  (Burd, 1968; Dalton et al., 1968)
    Reference
              Approximate
Year         Operating Cost
          ($/ton of dry solids)
Scanlon
Nusbaum and Cook    1959-1960

Nusbaum and Cook       1960


Dalton et al.


Burd
1957             $7.50


                $10.00

                 $4.00


1968          $20.00-23.00


1968           $4.00-30.00
         Remarks
New York, about the same
as barging to sea.

San Diego, 21-mile haul.

San Diego, $1.50 for pipe-
line transfer.

Chicago Sanitary District
preliminary estimate.

General range with $10/ton
average.
                                         V-32

-------
1000
            345 67890      2   345 67890
                                          234 567890  100
    cr> '
    CO •
    10
    LT) •
    CVJ
  100
CO
o
    CTi
    CO
    IT)
    C\J
10


CO
10
in

*3-
  1.0
                                                           (£>
                                                           CO
                                                           •-J
                                                                     ro
                                                          UD
                                                          CO
                                                                     CTl

                                                                     tn
                                                                     IN5
                                                            .0
                                                                     CO
                                                                     CTi
                                                                     tn
                                                                     -p>

                                                                     CO
                                                          0.1
                                                               10
                                                               re
                                                               in
                                                               c
                                                               o
                                                                          (fl
                                                                          a
                                                                          c
                                                                          o
                                                               (J
                                                               3
                                                               S-
                                                               4->
                                                               I/)
                                                               C
                                                               O
           2    345  67890     2   345 67890      234  567890
    10                     100                 1000                 10,000
            Dry Solids (ton/day in processing  capacity)
      Notes:

      1.
      2.
      3.
      4.
      5.
      6.
Minneapolis, March  1972,  ENR Construction Cost Index  of  1827.
Amortization at  7%  for  20 years.
Labor rate of $6.25 per hour.
Application rate of 25  dry tons per acre per year.
Sludge diluted to a solids content of 2% for spray distribution.
Storage lagoons,  dilution wells,  pumping station, piping and
spray distribution  equipment included.
     Figure  V-~\.    Surface Spreading Costs  (Stanley Consultants, 1972)
                                \l-33

-------
E.    SLUDGE TRANSPORTATION SUBSYSTEMS

     Sludge transportation is an integral  part of sludge disposal  or
utilization.   Transportation frequently exerts a significant influence
upon overall  costs.   Optimization of sludge handling and disposal  or
utilization requires examination of the reliability, costs,  and envi-
ronmental  effects of various sludge transportation modes.  There are
four modes identified:   truck, rail, barge, and pipeline.

     1.    Truck Transportation

          Hauling of sludge by truck offers the advantage of flexibility
     in routes and destinations.  Liquid sludge can be hauled by trucks
     from one treatment plant to another for further treatment or dispos-
     al.   Dewatered sludge is commonly hauled by trucks to landfill  sites
     for disposal, or to stockpiles for subsequent utilization as fertili-
     zer and soil conditioner.  Hauling distance can range from a few miles
     to several hundred miles.

          Economics of trucking sludge are determined by hauling distances
     and sludge characteristics.  Unit costs increase with increasing solids
     content and hauling distance.  A comparative study of the costs of trans-
     porting 3.5% solids by pipeline, tank truck and railroad tank car in-
     dicates that truck transportation is the most economical mode for dis-
     tances up to 150 miles and for a treatment plant size of approximately
     1.5 MGD.  Truck hauling costs per wet or dry ton of sludge are pre-
     sented as a function of sludge hauling distances and solids content
     in Figure V-2.

          The Blue Plains treatment plant in the District of Columbia in
     1973 used its digested sludge for reclaiming marginal soils.  Truck
     hauling and final  disposal of sludge cake (20% solids)  were handled
     by a private contractor at a cost of $6.85 per wet ton.  In 1974,
     the contracted price was up to $8.25 per wet ton (Cassel and Mohr,
     1974).
                                    V-34

-------
 1000
  800

  600

  400
 ,200
1/1
s_
(O
-g 100
~ 80

J> 60

   40



   20

   15

   10
     8
c
O
i.
o>
D-

i.
O

c
o
s-
O)
Q_
 o
o
                           ,   I
100
 80

 60

 40
 20

 15

 10
  8
  6
1.0
 .8

 .6

 .4



 .2


 .1
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    -a
                                                                                    c
                                                                                    o
      0)
      
-------
     Health hazards  and odor nuisance  associated with  sludge  haul-
ing by trucks are minimized  by the  use of special  trucks  with a  sealed
tailgate and tarpaulin cover or,  in case  liquid sludge is hauled, a
sealed tank.  However, the noise  and air  pollutants  generated by the
trucks enroute to disposal or utilization sites are  generally unavoid-
able.

2.   Rail  Transportation

     Railroads are an attractive  mode  for sludge transportation  when
tracks are near the  origin and destination of  the  sludge  and  long dis-
tance hauling is required.   Liquid  sludge can  be hauled by rail  tank
cars, and dewatered  sludge in either open or closed  hopper cars.  Ma-
jor structures required for  railroad transportation  are loading  and
unloading facilities.

     Recently, some  attention has been given to the  unit  train concept
as a means of hauling sludge and  refuse.   The  technology  is available
and under consideration by several  metropolitan districts. The  unit
train in this instance might comprise  80  cars  or vehicles. Each vehi-
cle is a 20,000-gallon tank  car with special fittings, and each  can
handle a load of 80  tons of  sludge. The  train could make journeys  of
several hundred miles.  Indoor or outdoor systems  could load  sludge
either through the top of the tank  or  through  a loading connection  at
the bottom.  Completely automated systems could load 400,000  gallons
of sludge into 20 cars in less than 3  1/2 hours with a three-man crew.
By increasing pumping rates, the  facility could load 600,000  gallons
of sludge in 2 1/2 hours. A two-man unloading crew  could unload the
sludge in approximately 2 hours.  Based on a 200-mile  journey, the
80-car unit train would have an overall turn-around  time  of 48 hours
(Kostalich, 1973).

     Based on a daily handling rate of 7,000 wet tons, the handling
cost for a unit train would  be less than  $2.00 per ton of wet sludge
containing 6% solids  (Kostalich,  1973).  The unit  cost of hauling
                                V-36

-------
sludge by a regular train is higher and depends on the rate struc-
tures, which vary with geographic location.  On reviewing the haul-
ing contracts for Philadelphia and San Francisco, unit costs were
found to be $5.39 per ton and $6.25 per ton, respectively.  The
former figure includes final disposal; the latter does not (Stanley
Consultants).  The unit cost per dry ton of sludge as a function of
hauling distance is given in Figure V-3.   For distances greater than
150 miles, rail  transportation is more economical  than trucking for
treatment plants of 1.5 MGD.  Generally,  the cost of rail  transporta-
tion could be reduced in half if the unit train concept were  utilized
(Easton, 1970).

     The environmental hazards of hauling sludge by rail are similar
to those for truck hauling.   However, in the event of an accident,
environmental impacts could be worse because of the vastly increased
amount of sludge.

3.   Barge Transportation

     Barging of sludge must be considered as an alternative mode of
shipping when navigable waterways are available between origin and
destination.  Large quantities of sludge can be transported effi-
ciently, and often barges can be rented.

     The costs of barging sludge are examined in the earlier sec-
tion concerning ocean dumping.  The cost of barging 250 miles from
Washington, D.C. has been reported as $3.50 per wet ton (Smith,
1968).  The barging of sludge 188 miles on the Illinois River from
Chicago costs $1.80 per wet ton, based on a shipping rate of 9,000
tons per day (Stanley Consultants, 1972).

     Environmental considerations in barging sludge are completely
different from those for truck or rail hauling.  Accidental spills
of sludge from barges could cause severe short-term irreversible
impacts such as a fish kill  or destruction of local benthos.   How-
ever, the probability of this occurring is small.
                              V-37

-------
 1000

  800


  600



  400
(C
o
T3
I 100
Q


S-
<1>
Q.
   80


   60
5  40
    20
    10
                J.
                                    J	L
      10
               20        40     60  80 100       200

                     Distance to Disposal Point (miles)
lOO-
                                                                           100


                                                                            80



                                                                            60


                                                                            40
                                                                             20
                                                                                s-
                                                                                to
                                                                                o
                                                                                "O
                                                                                 O)
                                                                                 Ol
                                                                                o.
                                                                              .   (/I
                                                                              4   o
 10

  8
  1
000
   Figure V-3.   Rail Costs (Riddell and Cormick,  1968;  Stanley Consultants, 1972)
                                          V-38

-------
4.   Pipeline Transportation

     Pumping of sludge and waste slurries through pipelines has been
practiced for many years.  Short distance pumping of sludge exists
in most sewage treatment plants.  Transporting sludge through pipe-
lines has also become a popular mode for intermediate and long dis-
tances.

     When assessing this alternative, the main factor to consider is
the hydraulic characteristics of the sludge.  Sludge containing 5% sol-
ids flows as Newtonian liquid, which is similar to water with respect to
friction and power requirements.  Sludge with greater than 6% solids
possesses plastic properties, requiring a prohibitive amount of energy
for long distance pumping (Sparr, 1971).  A minimum flow velocity must
be maintained to prevent solids from settling and to sustain the flow
during turbulence.  Other problems associated with sludge pumping are
grease build-up and pipe corrosion.  Degreasing the sludge prior to
pumping and installing protective pipe lining will avoid these prob-
1 ems.

     A study was conducted to determine the feasibility of pumping
sludge from Cleveland via a 92-mile, 12^1nch diameter pipeline for
disposal on strip-mined land in southern Ohio, and of pumping sludge
from the Washington-Baltimore area 80 miles by pipeline to an ocean
outfall (Bechtel Corporation, 1969).  Capital and operating costs in
the first case were estimated to be $25 per dry ton or $0.27 per ton-
mile, assuming 3.5% digested solids.  The costs in the latter case
were estimated to be $28 per dry ton or $0.35 per ton-mile.  Based on
a population of 2,000,000, digested sludge with 5% solids could be
pumped 100 miles at a cost of $7 or $8 per dry ton, or approximately
$0.05 per ton-mile, to reclaim marginal or strip-mined land (Rand
Development Corporation, 1967).  These costs do not include acquisi-
tion of easements along pipeline routes.  The use of pipelines does
not become economical for transporting sludge 25 miles away until
the plant size reaches approximately 10 MGD.  A 300-mile pipeline
                                V-39

-------
cannot be economically justified until  plant size reaches  approxi-
mately 25 MGD (Riddel! and Cormick, 1968).

     Short-term environmental  effects  during pipeline  construction
include air pollution from traffic jams caused  by the  disruption  or
interference of traffic,  especially in  urban areas.  Proper insula-
tion of lift and booster  stations will  minimize noise  impacts  on  sur-
rounding areas.
                                V-40

-------
F.   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES

     The evaluation of system alternatives for a proposed action is generally
initiated by a review of existing facilities and their capacities, future plan-
ning periods and loading requirements, engineering considerations, and environ-
mental and institutional constraints.  Preliminary system alternatives are de-
veloped to represent a range of solutions sensitive to these considerations or
constraints.  The preliminary alternatives are then screened by cost analysis,
reliability evaluation, environmental impact assessment, and estimate of com-
patibility with all significant constraints.  During the evaluation process,
new alternative's or revisions of preliminary alternatives may result.

     In this section, current sludge processing and disposal systems are re-
viewed briefly as are the available and feasible methods for future processing
and disposal.  Compatible combinations of subsystems lead to the candidacy
of ten system alternatives.  System requirements and construction phasing,
average annual capital, operating and maintenance costs, facility life,
energy requirements, and environmental effects with their cost implications
are discussed for each of the ten alternatives.  By weighing each of these
factors, a synthesis of comparative cost-effectiveness of the ten system al-
ternatives is provided.

     Existing sludge handling and disposal systems at the West-Southwest
treatment plant, as well as present and future sludge production rates, are
discussed in detail in Chapter II and are summarized below.   Sludge dewater-
ing subsystems in 1973 included air drying, sedimentation or flotation, and
vacuum filtration.  Stabilization subsystems available were  heated anaerobic
digestion, Imhoff digestion, heat drying, and wet air oxidation.  Subsystems
for disposal and utilization in 1973 included:

     •    Lagooning of liquid sludge after sludge concentration and
          anaerobic digestion
     •    Sale of dried sludge as fertilizer after sludge concentra-
          tion, vacuum filtration, and heat drying
     •    Stockpiling and distribution as fertilizer after Imhoff
          digestion and air drying on sand beds
                                     V-41

-------
     t    Stockpiling of scum and grit
     •    Land application of liquid sludge after  sludge  concen-
          tration and anaerobic digestion
     •    Land application of liquid sludge after  Imhoff  digestion.

The wet air oxidation process has been on a standby basis since  1972.

     The average sludge processing rate in 1973 was approximately 673  dry
tons per day (MSDGC, 1975a).  Based on an area population projection and as-
suming a planning period of 25 years beginning in  1975, the raw  sludge fore-
cast is 1,190 dry tons per day in the year 2000 (MSDGC, 1975a).   This  fore-
cast includes 52 dry tons of sludge per day from the Northside plant.

     Ten system alternatives for sludge processing and disposal  were devel-
oped on the basis of experience gained from plant  operations and research
on various technical topics (MSDGC, 1973a, 1974a,  1974b,  1974c).   Each sys-
tem alternative has a planning period of 25 years, an average sludge produc-
tion rate of 1,236 dry tons per day, and a maximum rate of 1,350 dry tons
per day.  Each alternative consists of a combination of several  subsystems;
namely, dewatering, stabilization, disposal and/or utilization and trans-
portation subsystems.  The system alternatives and sludge flows  for each
alternative are presented in Figure V-4.  The costs, system requirements,
construction phasing, and life of facilities for each system alternative
are summarized in Table V-4,(MSDGC, 1975a).

     1.   System Requirements, Phasing, Costs, and Life

          System 1 uses flotation-concentration of waste  activated sludge,
     anaerobic digestion, centrifuge dewatering, and ultimate disposal of
     digested, dewatered sludge by sanitary landfill ing.   The system re-
     quirements and construction phasing are as follows:

          •    Seven 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries with con-
               centration facilities constructed in 1975; four of the
               same constructed in 1980
                                     V-42

-------
F.   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES

     The evaluation of system alternatives for a proposed action is generally
initiated by a review of existing facilities and their capacities, future plan-
ning periods and loading requirements, engineering considerations, and environ-
mental and institutional constraints.   Preliminary system alternatives are de-
veloped to represent a range of solutions sensitive to these considerations or
constraints.  The preliminary alternatives are then screened by cost analysis,
reliability evaluation, environmental  impact assessment, and estimate of com-
patibility with all significant constraints.  During the evaluation process,
new alternatives or revisions of preliminary alternatives may result.

     In this section, current sludge processing and disposal systems are re-
viewed briefly as are the available and feasible methods for future processing
and disposal.  Compatible combinations of subsystems lead to the candidacy
of ten system alternatives.  System requirements and construction phasing,
average annual capital, operating and maintenance costs, facility life,
energy requirements, and environmental effects with their cost implications
are discussed for each of the ten alternatives.  By weighing each of these
factors, a synthesis of comparative cost-effectiveness of the ten system al-
ternatives is provided.

     Existing sludge handling and disposal systems at the West-Southwest
treatment plant, as well as present and future sludge production rates, are
discussed in detail in Chapter II and are summarized below.   Sludge dewater-
ing subsystems in 1973 included air drying, sedimentation or flotation, and
vacuum filtration.  Stabilization subsystems available were  heated anaerobic
digestion, Imhoff digestion, heat drying, and wet air oxidation.  Subsystems
for disposal and utilization in 1973 included:

     •    Lagooning of liquid sludge after sludge concentration and
          anaerobic digestion
     a    Sale of dried sludge as fertilizer after sludge concentra-
          tion, vacuum filtration, and heat drying
     •    Stockpiling and distribution as fertilizer after Imhoff
          digestion and air drying on sand beds
                                     V-41

-------
     t    Stockpiling of scum and grit
     •    Land application of liquid sludge after sludge concen-
          tration and anaerobic digestion
     t    Land application of liquid sludge after Imhoff digestion.

The wet air oxidation process has been on  a standby basis since 1972.

     The average sludge processing rate in 1973 was approximately 673  dry
tons per day (MSDGC, 1975a).   Based on an  area population projection and as-
suming a planning period of 25 years beginning in 1975,  the raw sludge fore-
cast is 1,190 dry tons per day in the year 2000 (MSDGC,  1975a).  This  fore-
cast includes 52 dry tons of sludge per day from the Northside plant.

     Ten system alternatives for sludge processing and disposal were devel-
oped on the basis of experience gained from plant operations and research
on various technical topics (MSDGC, 1973a, 1974a, 1974b, 1974c).   Each sys-
tem alternative has a planning period of 25 years, an average sludge produc-
tion rate of 1,236 dry tons per day, and a maximum rate of 1,350 dry tons
per day.  Each alternative consists of a combination of several subsystems;
namely, dewatering, stabilization, disposal and/or utilization and trans-
portation subsystems.  The system alternatives and sludge flows for each
alternative are presented in Figure V-4.  The costs, system requirements,
construction phasing, and life of facilities for each system alternative
are summarized in Table V-4,(MSDGC, 1975a).

     1.   System Requirements, Phasing, Costs^ and Life

          System 1 uses flotation-concentration of waste activated sludge,
     anaerobic digestion, centrifuge dewatering, and ultimate disposal of
     digested, dewatered sludge by sanitary landfill ing.  The system re-
     quirements and construction phasing are as follows:

          •    Seven 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries with con-
               centration facilities constructed in 1975; four of the
               same constructed in 1980
                                     V-42

-------
System
   1      Flotation-Concentration-* £« -» gntHJuj  ___> Sanitary
         Flotation-Concentration
                                                           or  rail ,
                                                           200 ml )
3     Flotation-Concentration-^Anaeroblc  __» ^Application

                                          200 mi)

                                Heat Drying  - ^Fertilizer Sale

                               • Incineration  "f truck
   4     Centrifuge DewateHng

   5     Centrifuge Dewatering
   •^Centrifuge Dewatering
           (455 dt/d)
                                   Heat Drying
                                                       truck)


                                              Fertilizer Sale
              (781  dt/d)
—^Centrifuge Dewatering.
        (455 dt/d)
                                Heat Drying
                                                           200 mi)


                                                   -Fertilizer Sale
                                                                   o? "
             (1,143 dt/d)
            Digestion  	
         (93 dt/d)

     •Flotation-Concentration
           (1.143 dt/d)
                                   on Sand Beds
                                                             (truck)
                                                                      Sanitary Landfill
                                   Digestlon ^'Dewatering
  10
  -^Flotation-Concentration—». {££&£•
                                                                       Und Application
                                                             (truck     of Dewatered Sludge

                                                             ^ ' '
                                                          D1stribut1on
                                                     >Land  Application of Liquid Sludge
                                                (oarge
                                                200 mi)
     —k.Vacuum Filter Dewatering
               (455 dt/d)
                                             (127 dt/d)


                                  • Heat Drying 	^Fertilizer Sale
 Figure  V-4.     System Operations and  Sludge  Flows   (MSDGC,  1975a)
                                            V-43

-------
                        Phasing, and Life of Facilities (MSDGC, 1975a)
Costs (106 dollars/yr.) , Roouirpment- and
S*stem Ta'pilal 0 & M Total Constructs Phasing o.
(») {$) ($)
1 5.62 26.05 31.67 7- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities. i
4- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
37 - 21.9 dt/d centrifuges to sup-
plement existing vacuum filtration
facilities.
10- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges.
Additional 152 dt/d flotation-con-
centration facilities.
2 13.84 36.22 50.06* Same as System 1. <
47.70** Land development (25 000 acres)-
Application equipment.
3 10.45 34.53 44.98 7- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
4- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
Land development (25,000 acres).
4 6.20 26.62 32.82 48- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges with flo-
tation-concentration facilities.
14- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges with flo-
tation-concentration facilities.
40- 12,000 Ib water/hour drying
1 i nes .
10- 12,000 Ib water/hour drying
lines.
5 5.12 -22.71 22.83 48- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges with flo-
tation-concentration facilities.
14- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges with flo-
tation-concentration facil ities.
10- 33.0 ft. diameter fluidized bed
incineration units.
102 dt/d ash dewatering centrifuges.
6 4.95 23.82 28.77 6- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
57- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges.
11- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges.
19- 12,000 Ib water/hour drying
lines.
Additional flotation-concentration
facilities.
7 ' 8.50 29.00 37.50 Same as System 6.
Land development (10,200 acres).
Application equipment.
3 5.74 25.78 31.52 Rehabilitation of Imhoff tanks and
sand drying beds.
7- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
3- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
37- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges to sup-
plement existing vacuum filtration
facilities.
10- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges.
Additional 152 dt/d flotation-con-
centration facilities.
A7.5'** Land development (25,0(1(1 acres)
Application equipment.
10 3.75 31.4 35.19 3- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
2- 100 dt/d digester batteries with
concentration facilities.
27- 21.9 dt/d centrifuges.
Land purchase and development
(2,700 acres) .
Application equipment.
Years
o in o ur> Life
CO CO O\ O\























































)






1


»























































*



k








t
















































>











•










•















i







t























»
fc
1









•


k
P
V






|
i



(25-yr.)

(25-yr.)


(10-yr.)
(10-yr.)

(20-yr. )

(12.5-yr.)


(25-yr. )

(25-yr.)


(10-yr.)

(10-yr.)

(20-yr.)



(10-yr.)

(10-yr.)

(25-yr.)


(25-yr.)
• (10-yr.)
(10-yr.)

• (20-yr.)

(25-yr.)
•
(12.5-yr.)



(25-yr.)

(25-yr.)


» (10-yr.)
(10-yr.)



(12.5-yr.)

(25-yr.)

(25- vr.)
• (n-yr.)



 'Assuming truck transportation.
**Assuming rail  transportation.
                                          V-44

-------
     «    Thirty-seven 21.9-dry~ton-p2r-day centrifuges evenly
          scheduled for construction in 1975, 1985, and 1995, for
          the purpose of supplementing existing vacuum filtration
          facilities; ten additional centrifuges constructed be-
          tween 1980 and 1990
     e    Additional 152-dry-ton-day flotation-concentration faci-
          lities.
The average annual capital, operating and maintenance, and total  costs
are $5.62 x 106, $26.05 x 106, and $31.67 x 106, respectively (MSDGC,
1975a).

     System 2 has the same sludge concentration,dewatering and stabili-
zation processes as System 1, but disposes of digested, dewatered sludge
by dry fertilizer application.  Trucks will haul the dried sludge 200
miles to an application site.  The system requirements include those of
System 1 plus the development of 24,638 acres of land by the year 1995,
and the necessary application equipment.   The land development and equip-
ment investment will be continuous over the planning period.  Annual
capital, operating and maintenance, and total costs are $13.84 x  10 ,
$36.22 x 106, and $50.06 x 106, respectively.  If a railroad is used
for sludge transportation, the total annual costs will be $47.70  x 10^
{MSDGC, 1975a).

     System 3 utilizes the same concentration and stabilization pro-
cesses as Systems 1 and 2, combined with ultimate disposal of digested
liquid sludge by land application.  The system requirements and con-
struction phasing include seven 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries
with concentration facilities constructed in 1975, and four of the same
in 1980.  There will be a continuous development through 1995 of  18,149
acres of land as an application site.  Barging is the proposed sludge
transportation mode.  Annual  capital, operating and maintenance,  and
total costs are $10.45 x 106, $34.53 x 106, and $44.98 x 106, respec-
tively (MSDGC, 1975a).
                              V-45

-------
     System 4 includes mechanical  dewatering  of  sludge  by  centrifuga-
tion and stabilization of dewatered sludge  by heat  drying.   The  dried,
stabilized sludge will be sold as  fertilizer  and soil conditioner.
The system requirements and construction phasing are:
     •    48 centrifuges with a capacity of 21.9 dry tons  per day  with
          flotation-concentration facilities,  evenly scheduled for con-
          struction in 1975, 1985, and 1995,  and 14 of the same between
          1980 and 1990
     •    20 drying lines with a capacity of 12,000 pounds of water
          per hour, constructed in 1975; 10 in 1980; 20 in 1995.
The amortized annual capital,  operating and maintenance,  and total  costs
are $6.20 x 106, $26.62 x 106, and $32.82 x 106,  respectively (MSDGC,
1975a).

     System 5 includes mechanical  dewatering of sludge by centrifuga-
tion, stabilization of dewatered sludge by incineration,  and ultimate
disposal by sanitary landfill.  The system requirements and construc-
tion phasing include the same installations of centrifuges with flota-
tion-concentration facilities as specified for System 4,  plus:

     •    Ten 33.0-foot-diameter fluidized bed incineration units,
          constructed between 1975, 1985, and 1995
     •    102-dry-ton-per-day ash dewatering centrifuges, constructed
          according to the same schedule as the incinerators.

The amortized annual capital, operating and maintenance,  and total  costs
are $5.12 x 106, $22.71 x 106, and $22.83 x 106,  respectively (MSDGC,
1975a).

     System 6 utilizes the operations of Systems  1 and 4 in parallel;
the respective capacities, of course, are less.  The system require-
ments and construction phasing are:
     •    Six 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries with concen-
          tration facilities, constructed between 1975 and 1980
     •    57 centrifuges with a capacity of 21.9 dry tons per day
          each, constructed between 1975, 1985, and 1995
                                V-46

-------
     0    11 additional 21.9-dry-ton-per-day centrifuges between
          1980 and 1990
     •    19 drying lines with a capacity of 12,000 pounds of water
          per hour, scheduled between 1975 and 1995
     •    Additional flotation-concentration facilities at the be-
          ginning of the project.

The amortized annual capital, operating and maintenance and total  costs
are $4.95 x 106, $23.82 x 106, and $28.77 x 106, respectively (MSDGC,
1975a).
     System 7 is identical to System 6 except that sanitary landfill ing
of dewatered sludge is replaced by land application of the dried sludge.
This substitution requires a continuous development of 10,200 acres  of
land by the year 1995, and requires investments in application equip-
ment.  The proposed transportation mode is trucking for the 200-mile
journey to the application site.  The annual amortized capital, opera-
ting and maintenance, and total costs are $8.50 x 106, $29.00 x 106,
and $37.50 x 106, respectively (MSDGC, 1975a).

     System 8 utilizes existing Imhoff digestion, sand-bed air drying
and sanitary landfilling in parallel with the same operations as in
System 1.  System requirements and construction phasing include:
     0    Total rehabilitation of Imhoff tanks and sand drying beds
          in 1975
     0    Seven 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries with concen-
          tration facilities constructed in 1975, and three of the
          same in 1980
     0    37 centrifuges, each with a capacity of 21.9 dry tons per
          day, constructed between 1975, 1985, and 1995 in order to
          supplement existing vacuum filtration facilities, and 10
          of the same constructed between 1980 and 1990
     0    Additional 152-dry-ton-per-day flotation-concentration
          facilities.

The amortized annual capital, operating and maintenance, and total costs
are $5.74 x 106, $25.78 x 106, and $31.52 x 106, respectively (MSDGC,
1975a).
                                V-47

-------
     System 9 is identical  to System 8,  except that sanitary landfill-
ing of dewatered sludge is  replaced by land application of the dried
sludge.  This substitution  requires a continuous  development of 24,638
acres of land by the year 1995,  and requires investments in application
equipment.   Truck transportation to the  application site 200 miles away
is proposed.  The amortized annual  capital, operating  and maintenance,
and total costs are $13.96  x 106,  $35.95 x 106, and $49.91  x 106,  re-
spectively (MSDGC, 1975a).

     System 10 is equivalent to  Systems  3 and  6 in  parallel, except
for a substitution of vacuum filter dewatering in place of centrifu-
gation before heat drying,  plus  another  parallel  sequence — Imhoff
digestion,  air drying on sand beds, and  distribution as fertilizer.
The system requirements and construction phasing  are as follows:

     •    Three 100-dry-ton-per-day digester batteries  with concen-
          tration facilities, constructed in 1975,  and  two  of the
          same in 1980
     •    27 centrifuges with a  capacity of 21.9  dry tons per day,
          evenly scheduled  for construction in 1975, 1985,  and 1995
     •    Continuous purchase and  development  of  2,700  acres of land
     t    Necessary investment in  application  equipment.

The digested liquid sludge  will  be transported to the application  site
by barge.  The amortized annual  capital, operating  and  maintenance,  and
total costs are $3.75 x 106, $31.4 x 106, and  $35.19 x  106, respectively
(MSDGC, 1975a).

2.   Environmental Effects  of Systems

      In  addition to costs,  energy requirements, environmental effects,
and  system  reliability must be considered in evaluating the cost-effec-
tiveness of a  system alternative.  These factors  are summarized in Table
V-5  for  each of  the ten systems.
                                V-48

-------
in
r«*
ot







>»
t- VI
1— t-
ss
ID U
•— U.


:essary
tigatlve
>asures
£*


c
0
4-1 Vt

0 E-0
10 10 O
4-> U
C Q.
O



c
°w
L. 4J O>


•5S
D. Q.



ill
w^S
c£ a.



V)
c
S- J-
O) ••—
C 3

Vt
O)
>
4-» ID
Vt C
>> 1-
tO O)
4J
tf







£
A P-
f-" H-
21
Q 10

Ife
0) H-
L .C OIU-
•»- IO I— (/»
•0 i- i. i— 01 —
C O -O t- U O
t'c •§ "c tl t:
2 g C 10 3 O

!§
Vt IO k
C IO *
O •*-> Ul V)
•»- 0> U C O>
4-> Et- O) C
10 C 0»*r-
££&£::
1^ ^5:^
•O O O IO **-
c -o "c
O >t C >> 10
l_> -O OJ .O ,—


o
c t.
-O 01 r-
C Oi-
IO C t-
IO M-
t. v> 13
Oi- C
SI5
Vt

E E —
o o *o c
1- S- S- C 3
-0 0) <4- 4-> «*- (0
C 4J C O)

S O •— 4-> C O 3

UO^CQ-UOC
3J-OW3QJ— O;
•

0 i-
Xs§
^cS>
r i?1^
4J 10 t~
U 4-> 4J
O) O C
F— r— Ol
UJ **- O






C7I
c
r-* .M!
1 0> U
C "*~ 33
OH- *f- S-
"•- Ol 4>
*-> a o
* x «-> L.
^u a» o

TL^ 2 a>
O. JZ iQ O">
fO Cft»"" fc. (O
T* to ai +J
m vt u *s .c:
"O O> f— Xt U
C C<*» CL 33
ID -p» H- &T3 •— W
t. 0 « 0 M 4->
• O C i-
L- -W 3 M- U **- M-
4j"c fcv.°S.o;0 °c
SO at P— r— 4J t— >»•— O
E?O**n
•^"o aoo'S'coso'i
t/)(J(_>UfOCJ CTO £
0)
C 0 C ^
v» « u. o »—
c ns * 4-*
O 4-1 V> VI (O -O
•*- 0) o c u a>
c w S 0*0. "
"E*X ?4J S" S
rs O O 10 O)
4-* 4-» D,*O "D
c -o c
0 >•» C >> 10 M-
0 J3 ro^Df— 0

O)
C7> . V)
Of C 3 O *E U
C -Q *lrt «*- O i-
1C «3 O 4-1
vi oi "o in ^"
•^ k. ^ =3- M-
3 a. L. -a o o
C Vt 0) C •*- V)
4J 10 tn .^^^ a>
t- E «O »— VI UQ.V)
O **- T3 O UJ 4J 4J 2
O) vi
k 4-1
§a> E •»-
1 4-> O "O C
V. L. IO IO L. C 3
•O QJ *+- O X 4J »+- IO
c 40 -p- a> c a>
2 O *ol 4^ C O 3
0-04-* 10 O 0> C — 4->i-
IDC3 Ol I- O ,4-»4-)
i- p •— C O 3O.UOC
V) C
t- 4-> -o O
O t- U C •*-
«*- *o c o « 4-»
C 3 "*- «
^ 4_ Q. 0)

u 40 +-> vi o -a f-
^^ =^J = C 3
• *



CNJ

c
O 0)
S?
•0 «


pc F- ie
= 8. &*2
to x « a> re
w ft, t. ^~
v a> •**
f- >» en 3H~


•»- « Vt C
1 =«-3f
5^8321
il
T'S «"§
JSI N.T:
O)T" C o at
4-> c vt a.
ra t. £ O
•*- O 3 O O «5 (

c o c at
V) IO I- O O*
C**0 * 4J 3
O 4-» V) V> «J i—
i- Oj U C O V)
IO "c O»P- "O
c u io o a.t-
*E*X S.4J ro O-
iO O O « •"-
4ji» Q.-Or-
c -o c
0 >> C >> «3 M-
O -O "O^ r— O
1
•o
T— )
o -a
a> J= a> 3
U O 1- VI
CO) CO E
3 f— V) 3 X 0)

0 S^O^l 1
St. C-O C «0 4J
(K •** O iD tt. c/t


§ ,2
t. u ie 3
•o a* *»- o o" 4-»
C 4J -~*- C
u^HZ 5
u TO •*•» « o a> c
10 C_3 O> I-
t 0^- =^30.
IB
t. W) U

i£ii £ J"^ =
X3 "5lQ. f
4J f— u 10 a.
"o § ^5-o^
•^t- CO"
L. 4J r— 0) IO 0)

U4J l/t "^ C
01 0 0) 3 TJ O
. .



















Ol Ol O
H ^ w
^ -oca
Ul f— O U
° °-o II
^ >t^ U 4J ID
A 4-> Q) C V) IB
°  o--- c
3 t- -M 3
.- M- IB 0
V> 1- i-
 O)
O) CO.*

"" c'1~ E —
J* « 0.0^
VI Ol5 J3~-*J
1
U) -O
i^I
"4- 3
.0) vi
O) C Ot C
r- 4V r- IO
>)•*-*
o^o -o a>
•













                                       V-49

-------
   r— in
   •i- i-
   -Q O
   fO 4J
   •r- U
   i— re
   QJ u.
  ,
  -r- O)
   4J i.
r- C O>

"o'iS
t/i re o
   4-> S-
   c ex.
   o
 O) +•> QJ)
4-> 3 »—
 fO r- .C)

3oS
   Q- a.






OJ
O 1-
O. ro
3 E

OI i-
(_) OJ
C M
OJ -i-
-O 1—
Q. i.
Q *



4->
13 re
c o>
re
c: o

U r-
o re
4-> >
1 1
& *-





c
o

4->
fO
C

S- rO
O 4->
C C
•r- O



O rO
**- JC


C O
o

tn -a*
in u
i- «o
E +*
UJ in
*

in
oi
o
0 3
L. O
M- W
0 C

11
^ c
£g

in

o •*-
<4- C
3


U 3
•r- U-

4-> i-
Oi C
LU o
^





QJ
3
VI



C C QJ
QJ -r- r-
o. i- re
o -o i-
> re r—
QJ QJ 3
.


in I
c s-
0 0>
tn O)
•r- 0 3
E
01 r- S-
O Ol
s_ i- IM
QJ 4-* t-
IIS
























to
l_
QJ
QJ
in
3

i. 1
0) Oi

^ "c £
S- 4->

<4- C C
L. -i—
e aj —
o ex u
t- 3 >,
<4- to U

in

t- C
O 3
«+-
cn
r- C

O >»
i-
t. -0
°^
tn re
5QJ
J=







t.
re



re

cn
O
JZ











































4->
C
3
QJ
3

U
4J
C
0>
u

















tn
C
O

re

3
cn
o>

*
rO
3





































































QJ
3 t.

O
C 4-> -O
0 C
•r- Ol rO

ro J3 Ol
s- 

in -a* O
in (j 4->
uj m QJ
*



E £
£i
'c 111
^ c £

111
3 QJ QJ
on J- U

in

O •*— t-
M- C 0
3 **-
4J O> r-

fj 3 O

i. -r- fc.
4-> fc. O
OJ C «
< — QJ re
1 1 1 (j ^j
ir>

^
0
in 14-
c
O >i
•t— 4J


=3 JZJ
cn re
Ol i—

re r—
re E c
.






tn
C
O
tn
1






































m
S
ro
i-
Ol
C
u
c


QJ
cn
3


,
Q
ul in
•— C
>•> 4-* O) O

r— O t- m re fO
*^- Q- re  cn c cn
r- ojs-ccoireoi
•r- (J QJ QJ "r" r— i.
fO «— C N E >>-O 01
c cd.i_>rot — ore
(OreQJQJQJOl3-C3
• » »


4-» in i
Ol M- -O « C U
i- J= OJ "*- C QJ O QJ
4-> -r- C tn Ol
JC'«- t. CO-^-O3


COT3'*-UoOre OOI
-r-ocre3O OQJS-o-r-



•o
c

c re * o
o 4-> m t_
•r- o> o *4- cn
4-> E i- C
ro C in -r-
c u re c *—
f~ *r- Cn QJ i —
re o o o*£
C -O 4-> C
5>> c re re
J3 re 0.1 —



QJ E o re
tn o S- QJ
C fc. *4- J=


^ OI r— C O
C O r- O
ro C -r- .,- wi in
re »*- in -^ L.
1- in -Q in O QJ
O -r- C -r- re >>
S3 (Q £ 4J i-
C r- LU in "C
Q)
l/J
in 3
0) in
O 1- 1 4-1
E t- OJ Oi i-
O 3 IS 1- TJ C
1_ 0-r- E C 3
^ C t. QJ
O C t! 4J O 3
T- -r- oi ra cn-r- M_
4-> O*4* C C 4J i—
3 O. i- •*- ro i.
r— 1 S O) r— 4J +J
r- C O CL U O C
001-3 >,— QJ
D. C l*~ I/) U **- U

U)

O f- I. C
*4- -O C O 3
C 3*4-
>> ro Cn
T- c cn-r- •*-
O O 3 O >i

i- 4-> -^ t. -a
4J re SL o
oi o c in re
r- r- O» (O QJ
«

cn
C


I (U U •*-> OI
C "- 33 QJ 3
•2 QJ 4-J C i- I/I
4_i Q. o a. re -i- o
(OX 4J S_ 3 E 4J


— >^ r- OaJQJ"-r-
D.r— J3 QJ C: N £ >i-O
Q.JZ rocnOJ-i-CLUro
re CTi— L, fO T3 r— O t! ^>
•OJZ4J C 1- QJ4->'a)4-> C
C Cr-OQ.l->re'—
» • * •
1 Ol
•r- cn -^
T3 cn r— -a o
C C »4- Q. 3 3

* o c ••-
O> -r- l_ O QJ O O
*j C tn CL QJ

SEre£°.o£°££
•r-O3OOreCO3O

QJ
cn
•o E -a
C O C 3
m re i- o •—
c re - 4->
O •*-* tn in ro ^
•r- QJ 
4-> 4J Q.-CJ TJ
C "O C
o >> c >h re M-
tj J3 re -G r- o
O)
cn
cn-o E ~O E -t-*
OJ C 3 O C O rO
U •"— r— 1_ 3 1- QJ
CTJU1 M-4->O "4-J^
re re oi u
\fl QJ "D VI O) I/I M-
•i- 1- QJ E ^_ . co
30.J-T30'4-"- 0
CinQJCi- E •!-«/»

i, Erer— ui u O ex m u
0 £ 5 c 'E u S "L "s 5
• • •

in
C OJ
O U S-
E — E s- Oi
O 4J O 3 M
*C 4J -^ S-
X o a.4-> o c s-
oj T- n. re -r- -i— QJ
(4-rj^--DTJT3r- 1 E
i-Or-C 3 •— C O Ol


in
tn +J
l_ 4J -f-
O -r- S- I- C
u- -o c o os
C 3 *4- <4-
>> re 4J cn
+j aj f— 01 >— c
•r- C Cn-^- O> t- -f-
o o 3 o -— o :>-,
•r- -r- 14- >t- i_
j_ +j .^- _ s_ 13
4-> ro U O) JC O
(U O C QJ 3 in ra
P- r- OI -r- i. fO QJ
UJ M- (J O +•> CT -C
r-^



in
C
o
U -r-
ro 
1 0 1
















in

U
3

4->

M-
O


QJ in
*



QJ
S. TJ
E C
C 1~
4-> O

O»r^ 5
5 &C
































in
c

tn



s-
S-






























in
4->
C
3
Oi
3
V-
+-»
Ol
(_)

































S-
ai
oi
0 3

i— i-
20J
N
O -r-




















































                                                                      V-50

-------





2
••- t/t
"re u
f- re
r- U.
0)




£>s
re *J t-
m re y
W Cn tf
(J 4J 4
*s*





E
O

re E
f— c a
§11
•M i-






J|

5^|
a. a.









O t/l
OF +•> ai
3 ^ C
o t~
o. a.





Wl

C


i- a>
QJ t.

LLt 3
O
S
V)
QJ 4J
+j re
t/> Ol






£
21
re re


C L.
58.

j. J= «t
Sf-S^I^
•oH £r^ 01 ^
C O TJi- U O
re 4J k.**- re t.
i- *E -o "E u c
*• O C  in t/>
•r- QJ u E en
•*-» E -f 0) E
re E Cn-r-
E o re o »—
•r- f- Cn.E r—
E x S- -M -.-
« o o re **-
4-* 4J Q.-D
C -O E
o >> c >* re



(J
Ql E
i/) 0
E i.
re Q) t~
O O E
Si- re
Q-t—
*


CO



i- fc. 1- E 3
-o aj **- 4-> M- re
E -M E. QJ
re re c re en c CT
S o ~- *-> E o 3
Q> f- f— ItJ T- «f- **-

i-O^CQ-UOE
I/) CT Q.^- CO b. £ U
• *


t- 4->
o •»-
**- -o c
E 3
>ire ^

•»— E O*
U O 3
•p- i- (*-


O -M +J
0> O E
r- f— 01
UJ **- O




CO
i1


i a> u
C ••- 33
OS- «4- i-
»r- QJ 4J
*-> Q. O
re x -*-> L.
." * °
1— >, F-
D..C re en
re cr>r— i- re
'f- re OJ ••->
•a .c j-> E s-
c c r- o
re IA QJ 3 ^
J. ft ^
^S W P~ ^ U
E C <4- Q. 3 3
fc. o re o o -M
* O E *P~
L. 4J 3 »*- I- 4- K-
at -f- w oo) o ovi
•M C tfl Q. QJ C
X E 0*0*0 E re'p4j'o*f-
refc-L.OL.L.-r-L.(/1
1-1- i-EC4-»-D C(OC-^
QJ
"O E ^
E O C 3
W (0 W O —

c 1e • *J
O -*J in in re -o
U i ^ S £ S
re E ai»— at
E (j re o o.+->
•P- -^ OUT Q. re
E x t- *J re S
re o o re 01
c ^ E
5>> E >, «J **-
^2 re^»- o

OJ
CT> tn

OJ E 3 O E L>
E T3 In M- +J O t-
re re QJ u. *J
tn QI ^ (/> QJ
•*- t_ QJ E •— • »*-
c in Q) c -r- E
S- £ iQf— to U O O. «n
005 •*- 3 O-F-I-
§t-Q)EEt.^-l-O
M--O O UJ +J — '4J ^
• • •


E W
O 1 •*->
E *^- OJ •<-
O •*-> 1- "O C
s- i- re -o E E 3
"o QI ^ (j 01 •*-* o re
E 4-» i-l- El- QJ
"* Z o'o.-S -S 03*
oi i- D. re re a>-'- M-
U-O-t-»re S QJ E E-*->t-
reC3 Qjcni-T-(oJ-
t o^"c"°"3 n.'u'o'c
3 i_ o re **- t— 3 x-— » re •*->
•M ai •— o>
*i— C 7>f- QJ
U O 3 O •—


•*J  in o
OJ O C OJ 3

UJ <4- (J O 4->




0
O QI

•F- re re re
>> 4J O »~ *^
•*J E E f- QI
i- 0 Ofr- « CM
r- "-SO- -COS- VJ
•?— *j •»— a. t/) E a. re •*-
m^OOJ^l.^3 4JCT
f—^-'r-D-OJi- Qlt-EC
re^'o.afTJ CTO E iw E">^
> E d. 3O> a> -^ a. t.
re re re ^*>p— L. 4-> ^ F— o "O



5£5S^S«S£^S
A • • • •
•i- C
^ Of— 10
0) M- E E O.
X- ^ OJ**- tVr- Q.-O
Sen E tn 3 L. -M M- s-
C T— t- Q) •*— O 0)
co-o^u'oSE'oc:
sllllisllss

•o E
E O C QJ
i/i re fc. "C o CT
r- M- Ef--0
c re » re -u 3
O -*J in in re t—
f- Of LJ E CT> U «
•M E ••- Q> C H-
re E m-»- f— -o
c o re o f— o.f-
f- f- 0>-E f— £v 3
E x i- 4J i- (D cr
«o o o re **- T-
-M *J Q.-0 "Or-
C TJ C C
5X E >» re re **-
J3 re ^ •— r- O
•o i-
E O
re i QJ
U) (J -Q Ol
QJ EOJf-3 -O QJ«—
O ^-LJXIAE3 (Jr-
n3Oirtjre-4->ot-m re **-
uiT3^3m -r-i*- in-a
i-3 i-QJE 01 -^C
cln C Cl-CTlOJ-r- C Cr-
s- E ^ i- 5 .E c re*^ s- E
oo.— oi-+Jrei-'~oo
O M- -E O re Q. in in O O **-
* • •
r- QJ
r- en
i— ~o m
i -o«*- 3 ai

»— 3 E (X) E »- O*
E a. cr re o 3 N
t- o a.-*- p— -a u. o •*-
C ••-> 4-» "O L. f-
QJ i— ro re **~ *•" at
O"O Ef— E O) X-MO1*-
reEre o ai QJ 3 o.
i-OEO4^3 r— C O O>
3l-Ot-re*— t*-ool-*n
•
E (A
o •*-*
0 ^ *J I- S- ^
4- re re o o 3
>-.*••-> en

-•- E COi- f- f- i-


l-*J-*-E F-ES--0




• • •



o
"

tn
.— c
u o
3 1- —
^0 IB
S1§.
u n ai
re o»,
i- re *>



"§
OJ C
en en o
1 1 ,_«2$l i
**- i- j; c r- en**- vi if- v)
O O O D. E O •*- O 3
•— >>-o oi -M re ^ »— S r- i.
O -4^ O) c tn re ore o QJ
Ill«l£lllll5













E
EOT? E
W ** 3 S
**- re O **- v)
fc. t. I.
g „ ^ g a.
•? °*i -2-D
l/t QI --* tf)
in cnO Q. vt 4->
•sssisl
• •

ai E
en o
-D I "O ••-
3 ai c -M
t— i- re re
§.£
* at ^~
4_m- 4-1 o 3 **-
E re cn-r- K-
-S»^oJ£-^reTI§in
u o. re 3 >>P— ai re E
< yj ^ t/) ^ l«_ (j » 3
• •




















V-51

-------
     The energy required by each system can be divided into three forms:
electricity, gas,  and oil.   Because the costs  presented for each system in-
clude allowances for energy consumption,  only  forms  of energy and relative
energy intensiveness are shown in Table V-5.   The cost increment to a system
resulting from future energy shortage is  proportional  to cost inflation for
the energy source  and the energy intensiveness of the  system.  However,
future process changes permitting energy  conversion  such as from oil  to
coal may ameliorate rising  energy cost.

     The potential environmental  effects  considered  for each system are
classified into three major groups:  air, water,  and soil  pollution.   Air
pollution problems involve  emissions from incinerators, heat dryers,  diges-
ters, and from transportation sources;  problems also occur from airborne
toxic or pathogenic materials, odors arid  noise due to  sludge processing,
shipping and disposal.  Water pollution problems  include surface and
groundwater contamination from sludge landfill  and land application,  and
accidental sludge  spills on waterways.   Contamination  of soil and asso-
ciated vegetation  may include the build-up of  toxic  metals or organic
compounds and of pathogens  from land application  or  landfilling.

     To approximately equalize all  systems in  terms  of environmental  ac-
ceptability, measures to mitigate adverse effects are  proposed for each
alternative system, and are listed in Table V-5.   Because the actual  scale
and costs of these mitigative measures  are location  specific, no dollar
values can be designated at this stage  of study.   The  last column of  Table
V-5 summarizes those factors limiting the feasibility  and reliability of
each system.

3.   Summary^ of Cost-Effectiveness

     As discussed  previously, the cost-effectiveness of a system represents
a balance primarily between monetary costs and environmental effects.  The
total annual costs of the ten system alternatives range from $27.83 x 10
to $50.06 x 106, as shown in Table V-6.
                                V-52

-------
c
O
4-3 ->-> .
Moderai
cu
Modern
r—
IB
•t—
Substan
01
Moderal
in
h^
en
 O
 o
 >

UJ
•r-
4->
 •a
 t.
 0)
 in
 en
 c
 ra
a:










o

o
E


r—
ra
c
01
c
o
S-
•r—
C
UJ

01
in
s-
Ol
XJ
ra

4->
01

O
D-













Ol

in ra
o o.
O.j=

O

c
o
•r-
+*
r— C

0 E
CO ro
4.1
C
0
0




c
o
S- +J
0) 3
•M r-
rO r—
2 O
a.



c
0
S- 4->
•p- 3
^ p—
r—
0
CL

c
O

en a
s- E
01 3
c in
LU C
O
CJ

Ol
_C ro
•r- 0)
1— XJ
CO O
z:

ra
•p—
~C C
en ra

r- in
CO J3
3
CO






01
1 < 1 t
J= ra
en s-
•r- Ol
i~~ TD
 O
y





.C .C
en O)
•t— *r-
f— ^_
CO CO




Ol
J= ra
en i.
•f- Ol
r- X)
co o
z:


01
ra
ai
-o
o
*
r—
10
•r-
C
rO
4_>
t/)
^
3
C/)




r—
fO
•r*
i*

ra
4J>
in

3
CO




_£;
en
•p-
f—~
co





_£;
f7>
.p-
P—
co



01
ro
Ol
XJ
0
•s:



jr
en
•p—
p..
CO









j;;
en
•V-
1—
CO



,_
ra
•p—
c
ra
4J
in
j3
3
CO

1C
•^
c
ro
4J
l/>
_Q
3
co

Ol
ro
ai

0
z:



^
en
•i—
P_
CO









JZ
en

,__
CO




ra
•r-
C
ro
4J
tn
(^
3
CO

1C
T—
c
ro

i/)
_Q
3
CO

01
ra
Ol
X)
o
s:


ai
ra
S-
OJ
X3
0
z:








j—
en
•r"
p—
CO





01
ro
s-
Ol
^D
0
z:



Ol
ro
t-
Ol
XJ
o
z:


Ol
ra
Ol
XJ
o
z:

re

c
ra

in
n
3
to






Ol
ra
S-
01

o
s:




O)
ra
s.
Ol
XI
o
z:



a>
4J
i_
Ol
XI
o




jr
en
•p—
r—
CO



Ol
ra

Ol
X)
0
z:








c-
cn

^_
CO






JC
en

r—
CO





^
en
•p-
P«
CO



Ol
ra
01
X)
o
z:

re
•p—
C
ro

in

3
CO






O)
ra
s-
01
XJ
o
sc





_r-
cn
•T—
^B.
co





^
CD
•r—
P^
co



Ol
ra
c
ai
XI
o
*


Ol
to

01
XI
o
z:







Ol
(O
s-
Ol
XI
o
s




Ol
- (C
i-
Ol
XI
o
s.



Ol
rO
J_
Ol
XI
o
z:

 01
.o
 ra
              EI— .m
             CO r— .
                 ai
                 OL
       01

       ra
       s_
       Ol
p—     XI
CO     O
       .
       en
c
ro
                     3
                    CO
 c
 ra

 in
_a
 3
CO
 01

 ra
 t-
 Ol
XJ
 o
 £
 Ol
XI
 o
ra

4->
c
ro
                          3
                          CO
              rO
       Ol    f
4J  '   4J    4J
JZ     <0     C
 en    t.     ra
•r-     Ol    4->
r^     XI     I/I
CO     O    J3

       z    <^
          r—  rO 
           ro  3 -t-> O
          4->  C in p—
           O  C O  X
          t— eC O--'
                                 10
                                 o
       i—    O
       n    in
                          cvi
                          oo
      OJ
      ro
                          ro
                          00

                          CO
                          OJ
                          *<»
                          o
                          IT)
                          OJ    r—
                          ur>    en
             co
             CM
                                 in
                                 ro
                     ai
                     >
 ra

 i_
 ai
4->

<
                           t—    OJ    CO
                                                                         CO
                                            V  -   53

-------
     Composite environmental  effects are evaluated by  combining the
energy, air, water and soil  effects of a system alternative.   Concep-
tually, this is carried out  by summing up the magnitude of each environ-
mental effect identified in  Table V-5 for each system  alternative.   A
ranking of system alternatives within each of the four environmental
categories is presented in Table V-6, along with composite environmental
rankings.

     Finally, the end column of Table V-6 offers an estimate  of the
relative cost impact of implementing recommended mitigating measures
(Table V-5).  The purpose here is to reflect a general magnitude of
costs, in addition to total  annual costs, necessary to more or less
equalize the environmental acceptability of alternative systems.  The
costs of conventional measures such as runoff controls are already re-
flected in total annual costs; therefore, the rough ranking of mitigation
cost impacts covers only extraordinary features such as wet scrubbers
for incinerator stacks.
                                 V-54

-------
                               BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abertson, 0. E., Low-Cost Combustion of Sewage Sludges, Proceedings of the
Ninth Great Plains Sewage Works Design Conference, 1965.

Anderson, M. S., "Comparative Analyses of Sewage Sludges," Sewage and In-
dustrial Wastes. V. 18, No. 2, February 1956.

Barnhill, K. G., C. Dresser, and McKee, "Sludge Dewatering," Industrial
Waste Engineering. V. 11, No. 5, 1974.

Baxter, S. S., "Sludge Disposal in Philadelphia" (Proceedings of the
American Society of Civil Engineers), Journal of Sanitary Engineering Di-
vision. V. 85, No. SA6, 1959.

Beaumont, H. M., "The Operation of Imhoff Tanks," Sewage Works Journal
(now known as Journal Water Pollution Control Federation). V. 1. No. 2.
January 1929.

Bechtel Corporation, Bulk Transport of Waste Slurries to Inland and Ocean
Disposal Sites - Summary Report, Federal Water Quality Administration,
Department of the  Interior, December 1969.

Bernarde, M. D., "Land Disposal and Sewage Effluent:  Appraisal of Health
Effects of Pathogenic Organisms," Journal American Water Works Association,
V. 65, No. 6, 1973.

Bubbis, N. S. "Sludge Drying Lagoons at Winnipeg," Journal Water Pollution
Control Federation. V. 34, No. 8, August 1962.

Burd, R. S., A^ Study of Sludge Handling and Disposal, Federal Water Pollu-
tion Control Research Series, Publication WP-20-4, May 1968.

California State Water Pollution Control Boards, Third Report on the Sludge
of Wastewater Reclamation and Utilization, Publication No. 18, 1957.

Caron, A. L. "Economic Aspect of Industrial Effluent Treatment," TAPPI,
V. 47, No. 9, September 1964.

Cassel, A. F. and  R. T. Mohr, Sludge Handling and Disposal at Blue Plains.
Proceedings of the National Conference on Municipal Sludge Management,
Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, June 1974.

Chaiken, E. I., S. Poloncsik, and C. D. Wilson, Muskegon Sprays Sewage
Effluents on Land. Proceedings of a National Symposium on Ultimate Dis-
posal of Wastewaters and Their Residuals, North Carolina Research Triangle
Universities and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 1973.

Dalton, F. E., et  al., "Land Reclamation - A Complete Solution of the Solid
Disposal Problem," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V. 40, No. 5,
1968.

Dalton, F.  E. and  R. R. Murphy, "Land Disposal V:  Reclamation and Recycle,"
Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation. V. 45, No. 7, July 1973.


                                   V-55

-------
Easton, J., Transportation of Freight in the Year  2000,  Report for Detroit-
Edison Company, September 1970.

Epstein, E. and G.  B.  Willson,  Composting Sewage Sludge,  Proceedings of the
National Conference on Municipal  Sludge  Management,  Pittsburg, Pennsylvania,
June 1974.

Ettelt, G.  A. and T.  J.  Kennedy,  "Research and  Operation  Experience in Sludge
Dewatering," Journal  Water Pollution  Control  Federation,  V.  38,  No.  5, Febru-
ary 1966.

Ewing, B. B. and R. I. Dick,  Disposal of Sludge on Land,  Water Quality Im-
provement by Physical  and Chemical  Processes, University  of Texas Press,
1970.

Fader, S. W., "Barging Industrial  Liquid Wastes to Sea, Journal  Uater Pollu-
tion Control Federation, V. 44,  No.  2,  February 1972.

Fleming, J. R., "Sludge Utilization and  Disposal," Public Works, V.  90, No. 8,
August 1959.

Grigg, R. W. and R. S. Kiwala,  "Some  Ecological Effects of Discharged Wastes
on Marine Life," California Fish  and  Game, V. 56,  No.  3,  1970.

Harding, J. C. and G.  E. Griffin,  "Sludge Disposal by  Wet Air Oxidation at a
Five MGD Plant," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V.  37,  No. 8,
August 1965.

Hickman, H. L., Jr. and T. J. Sorg, Sanitary Landfill  Facts, Public Health
Services Publication,  No. 1792,  2nd ed., 1972.

Hinesley, T. D. and B. Sosewitz,  "Digested Sludge  Disposal  on Crop Land,"
Journal Water Pollution Control  Federation, V.  41, No.  5, 1969.

Howells, D. H. and D.  P. Dubois,  "The Design and Cost  of  Stabilization Ponds
in the Midwest," Sewage and Industrial  Wastes,  V.  31,  No. 7, July 1959.

Kershaw, M. D. and R.  Wood, "Sludge Treatment and  Disposal  at Maple Lodge,"
Journal and Proceedings, Institute of Sewage Purification, Part I, 1966.

Kostolich, M. S., Hauling Digested Sludge in Tank  Cars.  National Symposium
of Ultimate Disposal  of Wastewaters and Their Residuals,  Research Triangle
Universities and U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency,  Region IV, April 1973.

Lue-Hing, C. and D. L. Brooman,  Compliance Test for Particulate Emissions
from Stack No. 2 of the Fertilizer Heat Drying  Operation  of the West-South-
west Sewage Treatment Works.  MSDGC R&D Department, October 1973a.

Lynam, B., et a!., Start-Up and Operation of Two New High-Rate Digestion
Systems, Presented at the 38th Water Pollution  Control  Federation Conference,
1965.

Merz, R. C., "Utilization of Liquid Sludge, " Water and  Sewage Works, V. 106,
No. 489, 1959.
                                   V-56

-------
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., Wastewater Engineering - Collection. Treatment and
Disposal. McGraw-Hill, 1972.

MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study, MSDGC Overview Report, Planning Depart-
ment, Revised January 1975a.

MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study, Central  Facility Area, Planning Depart-
ment, Revised January 19755.

MSDGC, Facilities Planning Study, Northside Facility Area. Planning Depart-
ment, Revised January 1975c.

Murphy, L. J., "Sewage Plant Operators' Problems," Sewage Works Journal
(now known as Journal of Water Pollution Control  Federation), V.  3, No.  2,
April 1931.

Nagel, W. B., "The Safety Features of the Imhoff Tank Reconstruction at
Dayton," Sewage Works Journal (now known as Journal  Water Pollution Con-
trol Federation), V. 13. No. 1.  January 1941.

New York State Department of Health, Manual of Instruction for Sewage Treat-
ment Plant Operaturns, Health Education Service,  New York.

North, W. J., "Ecology of the Rocky Nearshore  Environment in Southern Cali-
fornia and Possible Influences of Discharged Wastes," Journal of Air and
Water Pollution, V. 7, August 1963.

Nusbaum, I. and L. Cook, Jr., "Making Topsoil  with Wet Sludge," Wastes Engi-
neering, August 1960.

Quirk, T. P., "Economic Aspects  of Incineration Vs.  Incineration-Drying,"
Journal Water Pollution Control  Association, V. 36,  No.  11,  November 1964.

Rand Development Corporation, "Traveling Record," Engineering News  Record,
November 1967.

Riddell, M.D. and J. W. Cormick, Selection of  Disposal Methods for  Waste-
water Treatment Plants, Proceedings of the 10th Sanitary Engineering Con-
ference, University of Illinois  Bulletin,  No.  65, 1968.

Sanitary Engineering Committee Report, "Sludge Treatment and Disposal  by
the Zimmerman Process," Proceedings of the American  Society  of Civil  Engi-
neers, Division of Sanitary Engineers, SAC, V.  85, 1959.

Sawyer, B., Pilot Scale Vacuum Filter Studies  at  the West-Southwest Sewage
Treatment Plant, MSDGC R&D Department, July 1974a.

Sawyer, B., Pilot Scale Operation of the Carter Belt Filter  Press at the
West-Southwest Sewage Treatment  Plant, MSDGC R&D  Department, July 1974b.

Scanlon, A. J., "Utilization of  Sewage Sludge  from the Product of Topsoil,"
Sewage and Industrial Wastes. V. 29, No. 8, 1957.
                                   V-57

-------
Scottish Development Department,  "Dewatering of Sewage Sludges  by Centri-
fuge at Lockerbie, Dumfriesshire,"  Applied Research and Development Report
No. ARDI, Edinburgh, 1974.

Shea, T. G.  and J. D. Stockton,  Wastewater Sludge Utilization and Disposal
Costs, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,  Office of
Water Program Operations, Technical Report MCD-12,  September 1975.

Simpson, G.  D. and S. H. Sutton,  "Performance of Vacuum Filters in Sludge
Concentration -- Filtration and Incineration," University of Michigan, Con-
tinued Education Services, No. 113, 1964.

Smith, D. D. and R. P. Brown, Ocean Disposal of Barged-Delivered Liquid
and Solid Wastes from U.S. Coastal  Cities, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Solid Waste Management Office, Publication SW-19c, 1971.

Smith, R., "Cost of Conventional  and Advanced Treatment of Wastewater,"
Journal Water Pollution Control  Federation, V. 40, 1968.

Sohr, W. H., et a!., "Fluidized Sewage Sludge Combustion," Water Works
and Wastes Engineering, V. 2, No. 9, 1965.

Sowers, G. F., "Foundation Problems in Sanitary Land Fills," Proceedings
of the American Society of Civil  Engineers, Journal of Sanitary Engineer-
ing Division, Vol. 94:103-116, 1968.

Sparr, A. E., "Pumping Sludge Long Distances," Journal Water Pollution Con-
trol Federation, V. 43, No. 8, August 1971.

Stanley Consultants, Sludge Handling and Disposal:  Phase I - State of the
Art, prepared for  Metropolitan Sewer Board of the Twin Cities,  Minn., Nov. 1972.

Stanley Consultants, Personal communication with B. Lynam, Metropolitan
Sanitary District  of Greater Chicago, February 1972.

Stone, R., "Economics of Composting Municipal Refuse," American Society
of Civil Engineers, Journal Sanitary Engineering Division, V. 88, No.
SA6, November 1962.

Streeter, H. W.,  "World's Largest Imhoff Tank Installations Completed at
Chicago," Sewage Works Journal (now known as Journal of Water Pollution
Control Federation), V. 7, No. 4, July 1935.

Swanwick, J. D.,  "Recent Work on the Treatment and Dewatering of Sewage
Sludge," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V. 34, No. 3, March
1962.

Troemper, A. P.,  Discussion of "How Serious is the Problem"  (by H. E.
Hudson, Jr.), Proceedings of 10th Sanitary Engineering Conference, Uni-
versity of  Illinois Bulletin 65, 1968.
                                    V-58

-------
Water Pollution Control Federation, Sewage Treatment Plant Design,  Manual
of Practice 8, 1959.

Watkins, R. E., Report of the Use of the Bird Pilot Centrifuge for  De-
watering Digested, Sludge at the West-Southwest Sewage Treatment Plant,
MSDGC R&D Department, July 1974c.

Wolfe!, R. W., "Liquid Digested Sludge to Land Surface, Experiences at St.
Mary's and Other Municipalities in Pennsylvania," 39th Annual  Conference
of Water Pollution Control Association of Pennsylvania, August 1967.
                                      V-59

-------
               VI.   SIGNIFICANT SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND LAND USE
                     EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS

     This chapter is devoted to an estimation of future uses of the land
in the project area on the assumption that one or the other of two actions
are carried out.   The project either will  be discontinued in its present
state, leaving the land partially derelict and partially reclaimed, or  will
be continued and  the land reused at some time in the future.

     There are two steps involved in preparing these forecasts.   First,
it is necessary to predict the future socio-economic situation.   In the
first part of this chapter, socio-economic change affecting the environs
of the project site is predicted on the basis of present socio-economic
conditions reported in Chapter IV.  These projections are then analyzed
as to possible influences of project operation or discontinuance and of
eventual land reuse in the project area.

     The second major step is assessing future demand for various types
of land use.  In  the second part of this chapter, future land use demand
at the project site is predicted on the basis of socio-economic projections
developed previously.  Once the opportunities for particular land use are
determined, the project area is analyzed to ascertain the physical  con-
straints to accommodating such use.  Again, physical capability is assessed
under the two conditions of continued and discontinued sludge application.

     For the purposes of this chapter, it is assumed that socio-economic
and land use oppportunities are not constrained by possible environmental
or health risks associated with either project implementation or abandon-
ment.

A.   POTENTIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHANGE

     Utilizing baseline information developed in previous chapters, this
section deals with projecting trends in population, employment and income,
                                   VI-1

-------
land value, public finance,  agricultural  activity,  mining  and manufacturing,
and retail  and wholesale trade.   These projections, once established,  are
then evaluated in terms of possible future influences  by the project.

     1.    Population Change

          Recent national rural-urban trends  predict future  population
     growth in areas such as Fulton County.   These  demographic trends
     include both historic trends and more recent factors  which are ex-
     pected to influence future  trends.   Past declines in  agricultural
     and strip-mining employment have been instrumental  in causing  de-
     cline in the overall population of Fulton County  and  increases in
     the populations of Canton,  Lewistown and Farmington.  Expected
     future declines in agricultural and strip-mining  employment will
     continue to affect the future population size  and distribution.

          More recent trends, such as the spread of industry to the exurban
     fringe of cities, will increase employment opportunity  in many rural
     areas.  Some of this manufacturing employment will encourage in-migra-
     tion of skilled labor.  Less-skilled labor can come from the existing
     rural labor force.  Expansion of industry to the west and south of
     Peoria can be expected to enhance employment opportunities for the cur-
     rent residents of Fulton County and increase the in-migration of skilled
     laborers and their families.

          A national survey has indicated that many city residents prefer
     nearby, or even remote, rural or small town residence to living  in a
      large city  (Beale, 1975).  Considerable demographic data  have shown that,
      since 1970, non-metropolitan areas are not only retaining people but are
     also receiving a  net migration  (Beale, 1975).  Factors associated with
     migration to rural areas include the growth of state and community colle-
      ges and the development of rural recreation and retirement places, as
     well as the decentralization of manufacturing.  Fulton County offers
      both recreational and  retirement opportunities such as the Wee-Ma-Tuk
      Hills development adjoining the  land reclamation project.  Community
                                  VI-2

-------
colleges, such as the Spoon River Community College near Canton and
adjacent to the project site, often cooperate with local businesses
in providing appropriate skills for new enterprise.

     This evidence clearly suggests that the population of Fulton
County can be expected to grow.  The major influences on the growth
rate are the development of new manufacturing in Fulton and south-
western Peoria Counties and the accessibility of existing and poten-
tial residential areas to these manufacturing plants.  When such
factors affecting growth are considered, the total future popula-
tion of Fulton County is expected to significantly exceed the popu-
lation forecast by the Bureau of the Budget, State of Illinois.
Future population is expected to be increasingly concentrated in
Canton, Lewistown and Farmington.  Substantial growth can also be
expected in the northeastern quadrant of the County toward Peoria.

     If the project is abandoned in its present state, current MSDGC
employees would have to seek new employment.  Manufacturing growth along
the Illinois River should provide employment for many of .the 120 seasonal
employees working on the Prairie Plan project during 1975.  Few of these
employees can be expected to relocate their families.  Most of the 23
permanent MSDGC employees would be expected to relocate their families
outside of Fulton County.

     Reclamation and reuse of the project area to produce crops or live-
stock would increase population only marginally,  because  it is estimated
that 708 acres of pasture or 360 acres of row crops are needed to sup-
port one family (Schmitz, 1974 and Muehler, 1975).  Conservation and
recreation reuse would attract transient tourist populations.

2.   Employment and Income

     Continued declines in employment can be expected in the agricultural
and mining sectors.   These reflect the influence of advanced technology
in replacing labor with capital-intensive methods of production.   Such
methods also necessitate increased training of the resident labor force
                             VI-3

-------
or the importation of skilled labor.   Even  though  the  number of em-
ployees in agriculture and mining will  decline,  increasing  skills will
enhance average incomes.

     Future employment in the service,  wholesale and retail  sectors
will  increasingly concentrate in larger towns.   This urban  orientation
will  be especially true for Canton,  but will  also  influence Lewistown
and Farmington.   Employment in these  sectors  will  be negatively influ-
enced by declines in agriculture and  mining,  but possible small increases
in manufacturing employment (mostly  in  new, small  firms) and increases
in agricultural  and mining wages should offset this effect.

     Under expected future conditions of higher  labor  mobility  and in-
creasing skills, the median income in Fulton  County is expected to
gradually converge with that of the  U.S.  (U.S. Water Resources  Council,
1974).  The higher average income and purchasing power in Fulton County
should increase the strength of its  service and  trade  activities.   How-
ever, higher local wages  combined with  low  unemployment is  not  especially
attractive to new manufacturing, although the proximity of  underutilized
urban labor markets and higher labor  mobility should enable a new manu-
facturer to import labor  or attract  commuters.   Most  of the new indus-
tries can be expected to  have small  labor requirements and  to be tied
to the production of metal  and machinery.

     The land purchased by MSDGC originally supported  an estimated 37
full  and part-time jobs,  mostly held  by local residents (Kelly, 1974).
While these jobs were lost after the  purchase, the increasing amount of
agricultural land needed  to support  a farm  worker  indicates that,  with-
out the MSDGC purchases,  the land in  the project area  would have supported
progressively fewer workers.  The increased number of  jobs  created by the
Sanitary District absorbed approximately 120  skilled and unskilled con-
tract laborers who average 6 to 8 months of employment yearly.   Most of
the skilled labor came from a multi-county  region  surrounding and includ-
ing Fulton County, but most unskilled labor originated within Fulton
                             VI-4

-------
County.  In 1975, the MSDGC paid approximately $890,000 to their con-
tract employees.  A rough estimate of the total  salaries for the full-
time staff of 23 is $300,000.

     Discontinuing the project would result in income losses amount-
ing to almost $1.2 million, as compared to a total  county-wide personal
income (in 1970) of about $100 million.  It is difficult to closely
estimate the multiplier effects of the job and income losses.   Project
abandonment would marginally affect the viability of a large number
of jobs in local retail, wholesale and service enterprises.  A reason-
able multiplier for a rural county such as Fulton County is two (Fern-
strom, 1974).  Because many of the currently employed, skilled seasonal
laborers live outside the county, the multiplied losses within the
county would be somewhat less  than twice the losses of salaries and
wages.

     Although no future date is projected, reclamation and reuse of
the land would eventually displace MSDGC jobs and income,  substituting
less intensive economic activities.   These probably would  be limited
by economic demand and land suitability to combinations of row crop
farming, livestock production, fish and wildlife propagation,  and un-
intensive recreation.  These uses would generate little on-site em-
ployment and income.   Visitors to the regionally attractive conserva-
tion or recreation sites created by the project  would add  some local
income in tourist-related retail  and service enterprises.   However,
poor access to the project area from larger population centers, due
to distance and lack  of a high-speed link, will  limit this potential.
Agricultural reuse, especially grazing, would have  a small multiplier
effect on local employment and income.   Feedlots  could contribute to
the expansion of nearby meat packing firms.

3.   Land Values

     Future land values in the project area will  be governed by the
growth of Canton, competitive  position in land speculation, and the eco-
nomic intensity of future land uses.  Expected future growth of Canton
                              VI-5

-------
would slightly increase the value of all  land within its  geographic
sphere of influence.   Speculation in coal  extraction and  marketing
might affect values in the project area should it become  economically
feasible to mine the thin seam of coal  underlying the strip-mined sur-
face layers.

     The availability of competing land at least equally suitable for
development is the major determinant of local land values.  Large tracts
of equally available and suitable land in Fulton County should keep land
values low in the project area.  Much of the project land is highly un-
suited for building construction.  Residential or industrial buildings
may require expensive structural modifications where they are built on
the disturbed unsettled soil of a strip-mined site.

     In Land Use Survey of Strip Mines, Fulton County., Illinois, unre-
claimed lands are defined as "areas where no attempt has been made to
reclaim stripped land to a productive use."  Using this definition, un-
reclaimed lands have been estimated to be worth $259 per acre or $64  per
acre less than reclaimed strip-mined lands which are used productively  (see
Table  IV-23,  page  IV-52).  Land  reclamation and re-use could, therefore,
theoretically add  about  $152,450  to the market value of the 2,382  project
acres  of  strip-mined  land  scheduled for sludge application  (MSDGC  Land
Developr.ient Schedule,  revised  August 1974).  For the period of sludge
application,  the 2,382 acres of  stripped  land and 1,000 acres of piece
land  (formerly  row-cropped), which  comprise the current and planned
sludge recycling fields, continue to be worth to the MSDGC  the paid value
of $378 an  acre  (Kelly,  1974).

4.   Public Finance

     Two major  influences are  expected to significantly improve the
ability  of  Fulton  County to attract and accommodate  future  growth, arid
thereby  expand  local  public finance.  One is the Central  Illinois  Light
Company  (CILCO) power  plant, now  nearing  completion.  Once  the CILCO
plant  is  operational,  it is expected to more than double  the total tax
base of  Fulton  County  (Sandberg,  1975).   The expanded tax base
is expected to yield  the local  revenues necessary to enhance public
                             VI-6

-------
facilities and services so as to facilitate growth.  The other influence
is Federal and State funding of public works, such as the currently pro-
posed road improvements between Peoria and Canton, which are expected to
substantially improve the regional attractiveness of Fulton County.

     Contributions of the reclamation project to local public finance
would be minor as compared to the projected huge tax revenues from the
CILCO plant and potential outside public funds for road or other improve-
ments.  Discontinuing the project will result in lost county revenues.
In 1973, the MSDGC paid to Fulton County roughly $102,000 in real estate
taxes and $34,000 in personal property taxes, most of which would be Tost
if the project is abandoned and the land is not reused.  According to a
statutory requirement, those formerly strip-mined portions of the pro-
ject area would be assessed at rates applicable to their uses prior to
strip mining.  Other portions would be assessed as unproductive agricul-
tural land.

     Most feasible reuses of the land would produce much smaller pub-
lic revenues than were gained from MSDGC tax payments.  Even prime agri-
cultural land in Fulton County (and very little of the project site can
be considered as such) is assessed at only $380 to $570 (1975 estimates,
Fulton County Tax Assessor).  Public recreation or conservation uses
would generate no tax revenues.

5.   Agricultural Activity

          The soils and topography of Fulton County, and of West-
Central  Illinois in general, are well  suited for agriculture and support
highly productive principal crops such as corn, soybeans, and hay.   Fu-
ture productivity of local agriculture will be influenced by the rich
loess soils and the generally level topography, as well as by changing
methods  of agricultural  production.  Average farm size should increase
while farming should continue to become more capital and less labor in-
tensive, causing continued decrease in farm employment and population.
At the same time, trends in farm production will increasingly favor the
use of larger, more level fields and farms.
                             VI-7

-------
     The impact of the project on agricultural  activity in Fulton
County hinges on the potential  productivity of  the 2,382 acres of
formerly strip-mined land used for sludge disposal.   It is assumed
that sludge application to the 1,000 acres of place  land will  only
marginally affect the productivity of these presently fertile  fields.
Other portions of the project area are only marginally suited  to agri-
cultural uses.  Calculations based on 1970 data show an average annual
return per acre from farmland in Fulton County  of approximately $85
for row crops and $31 for pasture.  Feedlots have a  considerably higher
return.  This suggests an ultimate agricultural  value added per year
by the project of approximately $100,000 to $200,000 (1970 dollars)
due to reclamation and agricultural  reuse.  (1969 data show a  county-
wide produce value of $33 million on commercial-sized farms, or farms
with sales of over $2,500 per year.) These estimates of dollar return
should be viewed only as crude indications of the potential lost value
of agricultural productivity should the project be abandoned or full
reclamation not be achieved.  The values of agricultural  production
fluctuate considerably from year to year.

     In its present state, land in the project  area  could be used pri-
marily for grazing arid row-cropping.  However,  without reclamation uti-
lizing sewage sludge, any row-crop production on formerly strip-mined
fields would depend on liberal  applications of  costly chemical fertili-
zers, extensive soil conditioning, and rigorous conservation practices
such as crop rotation.  Continued sludge application can be expected
to enhance the nutrient and organic content of  the soil considerably,
and this would favor more intensive row-crop farming over the  grazing
of livestock.

6.   Mining and Manufacturing

     The future importance of strip mining in Fulton County may be
determined by three factors:

     •    Increasing national consumption of coal for power generation
     •    Vertical integration of major coal consumers
     •    Large amounts of strippable reserves  in Fulton  County.
                             VI-8

-------
Increasing coal consumption, interacting with air pollution regulations,
land reclamation requirements, and future improvements in sulfur removal
from coal or coal combustion gases, will govern demand for high-sulfur
coal such as exists locally.  The vertical  integration of major coal
consumers, such as mine ownership and operation by a power company, would
make large amounts of capital available for the continued mining of
Fulton County's coal reserves.  Previously unmined, yet strippable coal
covers over 54% of the county (Griffin  and Chicoine,  1974).

     Clearly, the enormous reserves, the availability of capital for
their extraction and increasing use of high-sulfur coal would exert
great pressure to further exploit this resource.   Nevertheless, coal
mining is not likely to be a future land use in the project area itself.
The remaining thin, deeper seams of coal below the project site are not
nearly as well suited for future extraction as are other reserves near-
by.

     The major industrial firms in Fulton County are the International
Harvester Company and the Central Illinois Light Company.  Other large
industries include J. C. Schaefer Electric, Inc.  and Astoria Fibra Steel,
Inc.  Much of the influence of industry on local  employment is applied
by firms located in southwestern Peoria County.  New industries would
be more inclined to locate along the Illinois River than at the project
site where road access is comparatively poor and cheaper water trans-
portation for high bulk, low-value cargo is unavailable.  The water
supply at the project site is inadequate to support many industries,
and low local unemployment rates indicate a low labor supply.  Industrial
location both along the river and at the site is favored by large land
holdings, low land prices, available railroad transportation, close
proximity to central markets, and the availability of coal.

     The provision of internal access roads and the leveling of strip-
mined areas have lowered construction costs for industrial buildings
in the project area.  However, wastewater disposal problems and highly
                                 VI-9

-------
mineralized water supplies discourage industrial  development there.  Also,
unstable soils add significant costs and uncertainties to the con-
struction of building foundations, hard-surface roads, rail  spurs, and
underground pipelines.  Thus, the project site is neither physically nor
economically adaptable for future manufacturing uses.

7.   RetajJ and Wholesale Trade

     Future retail and wholesale activities in and near Canton depend
on the progress of road improvements.  Non-neighborhood retail business
and most wholesale activities in Canton could be affected adversely by
increased accessibility of the Peoria market.  Service activities should
continue to increase in Fulton County, tempered by the location in Peoria
of most highly specialized services.

     Discontinuing the project would cause some temporary decline in the
volume of local trade and services due to lost purchasing power of cur-
rent employees of the MSDGC or its contractors.  Reuse of the project
land would affect trade and services only slightly since most expected
reuse would be economically unintensive.
                              VI-10

-------
B.   LAND USE OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS

     The analysis of land use opportunities and constraints focuses upon
the combined effects of socio-economic demand and physical land suitability
on the future reuse of project land.  Of course, land reuse is not assured
by successful reclamation; there must be actual economic demand.  Once de-
mand by society is established, the available land must be physically cap-
able of accommodating the desired land use.

     On the basis of socio-economic projections, this section predicts fu-
ture demands for agricultural, residential, and recreation or conservation
land use.  The project area is then evaluated for its physical capability
to support these uses under two alternatives.  Suitability is assessed un-
der present conditions, assuming that sludge application is discontinued,
leaving the land partially derelict and partially reclaimed.   Then suit-
ability is predicted, assuming the project is continued and the land fully
reclaimed.

     Sludge application fields which were formerly strip-mined (about 2,300
acres) would be marginally attractive for added row-crop farming.  While the
addition of nutrients and organic matter has been limited so  far, the level-
ing of steep slopes, removal of large rock fragments from the surface, and
the installation of erosion controls possibly make these fields adaptable
to row crops.

     Cattle grazing is not an economically competitive use in those areas
which were formerly row-cropped.  Growing pasture, however, would be a more
likely alternative than row-cropping on the 2,382 acres of formerly strip-
mined land.  The major benefits from the project for pasture  use are the
leveling of strip-mine spoil and a slight addition of nutrients and organic
materials.  Leveling makes it possible to use farm machinery  to control  tree
growth instead of hand labor which is prohibitive in cost.  Small  portions
of the project area are well suited for the development of feedlots.   Major
on-site capability for feedlots has been provided by systems  installed to
control and monitor pollution from stormwater runoff.  Such systems are  nec-
essary for environmentally sound management of feedlots.
                                    VI-11

-------
1.   Potential for Agricultural Uses

     Present and future feasible uses for agricultural land in Fulton
County include row cropping, pasture, feedlots, and forest management.
Available information suggests that the future economic demand for
increased amounts of farmland will  be small.   Besides shifting toward
larger individual farms and increasing mechanization, local agriculture
is changing its composition.  Dairy, winter wheat and poultry produc-
tion have declined, while corn, soybeans, swine, and beef cattle pro-
duction have increased.  Increases  in beef and pork production have
been encouraged by expanding local  and regional meat packing facilities,
notably Oscar Mayer.   A trend toward feedlot production can be expected
to be matched by increasing production of corn for feed.

     Discontinuing the project and  reusing the site would make available
several  thousand acres of land for  row crops  and pasture.   Place lands,
where sludge has been applied to former row-crop fields,  are highly
suited to renewed row-crop farming.   Sewage sludge application
has increased the nutrients and organic material in the soil,  although
not markedly at this  early stage.

     Steep slopes and severe problems of access in unreclaimed strip-
mining areas have caused failure of previous  local attempts to manage
timber crops.  The steep slopes of  the strip-mined portions of the pro-
ject area have been leveled and many access roads have already been built
as a part of the MSDGC project.  However, there would be a long time lag
before the first timber harvest, and considerably more local land would
have to be planted with trees to provide enough continuous supply to sup-
port a local lumber products industry.

     Continued sludge application followed by reuse of the project site
could have a major beneficial impact during the entire application period.
The project could serve as the principal site in the U.S. for evaluating
the effects of various application methods in different agricultural acti-
vities.  The experiment would be highly valuable  in assisting other com-
                              VI-12

-------
muni ties in designing and managing their sludge disposal systems.  Con-
tinued sludge application would also affect the eventual reuse of the pro-
ject site.  The future productivity of the formerly strip-mined areas can
be expected to increase significantly with the continued application of
sludge, possibly making row-crop production economically feasible.

     On the other hand, the limitations to sludge disposal  imposed by
agriculture, such as required storage during winter and restricted appli-
cation during adverse weather and growing seasons, could prove incon-
sistent with the goals of efficient disposal at competitive cost.  In
addition, potentially toxic accumulations of organic compounds and trace
elements in soil, crops and livestock from prolonged sludge application
might outweigh the benefits of sewage sludge to agricultural soils, even
in land reclamation projects where such benefits are maximized.  (These
offsetting considerations are beyond the scope of this chapter, and are
taken up in Chapters V, VII, and IX.)

2.   Potential for Residential Uses

     Future demand for housing in Fulton County will primarily reflect
projected population increases and replacements of the existing housing
stock.  This housing demand will concentrate in central places (primarily
Canton, Lewistown and Farmington) and in eastern portions of the county
which have easy access to developing industrial employment  in Peoria-
Pekin and along the Illinois River.  Although the population of Canton
can be expected to increase, the size of this increase will be limited
in two ways.  First, employment centers and regional facilities in Peoria
are presently relatively inaccessible to the Canton population.  Second,
the trend in suburban expansion of Peoria demonstrates that the outer
ring of this expansion is not likely to reach Canton in the foreseeable
future.

     Two independent methods are used to calculate future housing demand.
One is based on population projections; the other is based  on trends in
the issuance of building permits.  Population projections by the State of
Illinois Bureau of the Budget (1975) predict a countywide population of
                            VI-13

-------
42,031 for 1980 and 44,691  for 1990.   As explained in Section IV.  E,
more reasonable estimates are 44,000  by 1980 and 48,000 by 1990.   These
estimates suggest respective increases of approximately 1,600 and  4,600
over U.S. Bureau of Census  estimates  of 42,400 for July 1974.  Assuming
3.5 persons per household,  this population increase would add nearly 460
new housing units by 1980 and a total  of over 1,300 units by 1990.  In
addition, normal replacement of obsolete housing, tornado damage  to hous-
ing, and county-wide migration to central places will all contribute to the
demand for new units.  Considering all factors, the total number  of new
units might exceed 600 by 1980 and 2,000 by 1990.

     Building permit data substantiate these projections.  Data from 1972
to 1975 show that building  permits were issued for an average of  98 single-
family homes and 48 mobile  homes each year.  The average number of building
permits issued per month significantly increased from 1972 to 1975.  Ex-
trapolating the average of  146 new units per year indicates 584 by 1980
and 2,044 by 1990.

     There are major constraints to residential uses in the project area.
These relate primarily to water quality and the problems of building on
unconsolidated materials.  Local groundwater is too highly mineralized
to be suitable for drinking water.  The naturally clear, deep blue local
lakes are attractive to residential development.  However, this clarity
results from deficiencies of nutrients necessary to support algal  growth.
Experience in Wee-Ma-Tuk Hills demonstrates that even well-maintained
aerobic septic systems with a sand filter and chlorinated discharge cause
nutrient over-enrichment and consequent aesthetic degradation of the lakes.
These sytems are the most feasible for the project area, yet they cost
$1,500 more than a conventional anaerobic septic system (Muehler,  1975).

     Building on the unconsolidated materials of strip-mine spoil  adds
other premium costs to home building.   Settling problems force homes to
be built on reinforced slabs that average $1,000 in cost above conventional
foundations (Muehler, 1975).  Potential settling also adds significantly
                              VI-14

-------
to the cost of providing and maintaining pipelines and hard-surface
roads.  Despite such serious constraints, improvements made by the
MSDGC to the formerly strip-mined portions of the project site have
increased its suitability for residential use.  These improvements
do not, however, counter-balance the constraints which, together with
the availability of numerous competing home sites throughout the
county, make future residential development highly unlikely.

3.   Potential for Recreation and Conservation Uses

     Several factors directly concerning recreation are of major im-
portance in an evaluation of impacts resulting under the action al-
ternatives:

     •    Effects of generally poor accessibility on the use of
          regionally-oriented facilities
     •    Availability of areas nearby with recreation potential
     •    Deficiencies in locally-oriented recreation.

Poor accessibility will be a major limitation on the number of visitors
to a recreation facility in the project area.  Poor road conditions com-
pound the difficulty in getting to the project site from interstate
highways or major population centers.  Of course, poor accessibility
hinders but does not preclude large numbers of travelers.  This is evi-
denced by more than 100,000 visitors last year to Dickson Mounds State
Park and 100,000 visitors attending the four-day Spoon River Drive Fall
Festival (Bordner, 1975; Shields, 1975).

     The attractiveness of a regional recreation facility in the pro-
ject area would be enhanced by the diverse attractions in nearby Spoon
River Valley, along the Illinois River, at Dickson Mounds State Park,
and in numerous formerly strip-mined areas.  They are often used for
hunting, fishing, camping, and driving off-the-road vehicles such as
trailbikes and snowmobiles.
                              vi-15

-------
     Probable recreation and conservation  uses  in  the  project area in-
clude hunting, fishing,  camping,  native  prairie and  wildlife and an out-
door ecology laboratory.   The MSDGC's  past and  future  alterations of the
project site can be expected to exert  important influences  upon each of
these activities.   Continued sludge application would  add  organic material
and mineral  nutrients  in quantities sufficient  for the growth of a greater
diversity of plant species than are normally  found in  unreclaimed strip-
mined areas.  Increased  plant diversity  generally  leads  to  increased di-
versity in wildlife.

     Former strip  mines  which are now  sludge  recycling fields have con-
siderably increased capability for intensive  or extensive  recreation use.
In particular, leveling  steep slopes and removing  surface  rocks have de-
creased site limitations for playgrounds,  campsites, recreation building
sites, roads and trails.   On the  other hand,  surficial materials are too
clayey for high-traffic  uses and  for the assimilation  of sanitary wastes.

     Continued use of  the project area for sludge  disposal  with eventual
release of sites for  recreation-conservation  uses  would  have a major effect
only in formerly strip-mined fields.   There,  the considerable enrichment
of the nutrient and organic content of the soil  can  be expected to enhance
the biomass of hunting,  fishing and prairie conservation areas.
                             VI-16

-------
                              BIBLIOGRAPHY

Beale, Calvin, "National Rural Urban Trends," The Futurist. September 1975.
Bardner, M., Telephone Interview, November 1975.
Fernstrom, J. R., Bringing in the Sheaves (unpublished), 1974.
Fulton County Tax Accessor1s Office, Personal Visit, October 1975.
Fulton County Planning Department and Associated  Planners, Land Use Survey
of Strip Mines in Fulton County, Illinois, 1973.
Griffin, D. W. and D. L. Chicoine, West-Central  Illinois:  A Regional Profile,
1974.
Kelly, George, Comprehensive Report on the Fulton County Project, revised
November 1974.
Illinois Bureau of the Budget, Illinois Population Projections, 1975.
Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, Land Development Schedule,
Fulton County, Illinois, as revised August 1974.
Muehler, Keith (Fulton County Soil Conservationist), Personal  Interview,  Octo-
ber 1975.
Sandberg, Charles (Fulton County Planner), Personal  Interview,  October 1975.
Schmitz, Peter, Economic Impact Analysis of Strip Mining for Coal,  Knox and
Fulton Counties,  Illinois, 1974.
Shields, Wayne (Dickson Mounds State Park), Telephone Interview,  December 1975.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Population Estimates,  Series P-26,  No.  128 (revised),
August 1975.
U.S. Water Resources Council, 1972 PEERS Projections. Series E, April 1974.
                                 VI-17

-------
          VII.  SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT

     The purpose of this chapter is to assess the significant environmental
effects associated with the project and to recommend mitigative or control
measures.  The chapter begins with a description of the characteristics of
sewage sludge being applied to Fulton County fields.  Sludge composition,
by itself, suggests the potential for various environmental effects.  The
discussion of potential effects begins with the theoretical considerations
in odor emission and detection, followed by the potential for airborne dis-
persal of odorants originating in the storage basins and those associated
with alternative application methods.  Potential contamination of ground
and surface waters is assessed by comparing present water quality with the
background conditions reported earlier.  Possible soil contamination is
evaluated next, and the chapter concludes with a description of noise ef-
fects associated with project operations.  These categories of environ-
mental impact are addressed in terms of general theoretical considerations,
measurement techniques, potential and actual impacts, and measures to either
prevent these impacts from occurring or to mitigate their unavoidable adverse
effects.

A.   QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF APPLIED SLUDGE

     General sludge characteristics and environmental problems associated
with sludge application are presented in Chapter II.  However, the assess-
ment of environmental impacts resulting from this particular project re-
quires a description of the characteristics of sludge being spread on Ful-
ton County fields.  This section describes the sludge used in this project
in terms of quality and quantity and concludes with a brief discussion of
methods to control the quality of sludge before it is applied.

     1.   Sludge Quality

          There are three types of sludges being shipped to Fulton
     County:  sludge drawn from heated anaerobic digesters at the West-
     Southwest (WSW) treatment plant of the MSDGC; sludge taken from
     the Lawndale lagoons, except in winter when icing prevents removal;
     and mixtures of the two.   Daily composite samples of sludge have
                                    VII-1

-------
been taken from the WSW plant loading dock and the Mannheim Road
Terminal loading dock next to the Lawndale lagoons.   The data on
total solids, volatile solids and acids,  and alkalinity are ana-
lyzed and plotted on logarithm-probability paper in  Figures VII-1
through VII-4 for sludge originating from Lawndale lagoons and
Figures VII-5 through VII-8 for sludge from the WSW  plant diges-
ters.  Sludge drawn from WSW digesters is occasionally used to di-
lute sludge from Lawndale lagoons to improve pumping efficiency.
Mixtures of plant and lagoon sludges are  regarded as sludge from
Lawndale since there are no data reflecting the mixture.   In these
figures, the frequencies of sludge constituent concentrations, such
as total solids, volatile solids, volatile acids, or alkalinity,
are given in percent.  For example,  if the frequency of occurrence
of 4% total solids is 36%, then for 36% of the time  the monitored
sludge has a total solids concentration equal  to or  less  than 4%.
In other words, the sludge has total solids concentrations greater
than 4% for 64% of the time.

     If the plot assumes a straight  line  on logarithmic paper, the
time-distribution of a sludge quality parameter is said to be log-
arithmically normal.  Logarithmic normality of a data group can be
analytically represented by two numbers:   geometric  mean  and geo-
metric standard deviation.  The geometric mean represents the level
of a sludge quality parameter above  or below which the frequency of
occurrence is 50%.  Geometric standard deviation represents the
spread of data points.  A small geometric standard deviation means
that all reported data values are close to the geometric  mean value,
or that sludge quality is relatively uniform.   The representative-
ness of the geometric mean and geometric  standard deviation for a
group of sludge quality data depends upon the number of observations
and the linearity of the log-probability  plotting.

     A rigorous mathematical  analysis of  available sludge quality  data
by skewed log-normal functions or other distribution functions was not
attempted.  Instead, Figures VII-1 through VII-8 show the geometric
                             VII-2

-------
 (O
 +->
 O
    10
     9
     8
     7
                                Total  Solids
   .5  1  2     5   10    20   30  40 50 60  70   80    90
   Occurrence of Concentrations  of Total  Solids

    Figure  Vli-1.
                                                       95   98 99 99.5
                                                       the Stated Value (%)
                      Total Solids Concentration in Sludge from the
                      Lawndale Lagoons (MSDGC, 1972a. through 1975g;
                      Enviro Control Inc., 1975)
  100
   90
   80
   70
   60

s 50
 40
T3
O
oo
O)
ro
'o
30
   20
   10
                          Volatile Solids
.512     5   10    20   30  40  50  60  70  80   90
 Occurrence  of Concentration  of Volatile Solids
                                                    95    98 99 99.5
                                                   ^ the Stated Value (%}
       Figure VII-?.
                   Volatile  Solids  Concentrations  in Sludge from
                   the  Lawndale  Lagoons  (MSDGC,  1972a through'1975g;
                   Enviro Control  Inc.,  1975)
                                 VII-3

-------
                               Volatile Acids
 rO

 O
 QJ
 O
 to

 CO
 fC
 co
T3
O)

•r—
-l->
re

O
      200
     100
      90
      80
      70
      60
      50

      40

      30
      20
      10
          12    5  10   20  30 40  50  60  70   80    90   95  98 90
          Occurrence of Concentrations of Volatile Acids ^ the Stated Value  (%)
          Figure VII-3.
                         Volatile Acids Concentrations in Sludge  from
                         the Lawndale Lagoons (MSDGC, 1972a through
                         1975g;  Enviro Control  Inc., 1975)
   10,000
    9,000
    8,000
O
O
re
O

CO
re
CD
E
    7S
    5,

    5.

    4,
000
000

000

000
    3,000
=   2,000
r~~
03
                                Alkalinity
    1,000  12    5  10   20  30 40 50 60 70  80   90  95    98  99

          Occurrence of Concentrations of Alkalinity ^ the  Stated  Value (%)

          Figure VI1-4.  Alkalinity Concentrations in  Sludge from  the
                         Lawndale Lagoons (MSDGC, 1972a through
                         1975g-3 Enviro Control Inc., 1975)
                              VII-4

-------
                                 Total Solids
to
•o
o
to
no
•»->
O
 to
-a
 o
oo
 O)
 fO
•t->
 o
10
 9
 8
 7
 6
 5

 4

 3
    1
     •2  .5  1  2   5    10    20  30   40  50  60  70  80    90   95  98 99 99.5 99.8
      Occurrence of Concentrations  of Total Solids  ^ the Stated  Value (%)
      Figure VI1-5.  Total Solids Concentrations in Sludge from  the WSW Plant
                     (MSDGC,  1972a  through 1975g; Enviro Control  Inc.,  1975)
100
 90
 80
 70
 60
 50

 40
                             Total Volatile Solids
r:  30
    20
    10
     .2.512    5  10    20 30 40 50 60 70  80   90  95   98 99 99.5 99.8

       Occurrence of Concentrations of Total Volatile Solids
-------
     200
                             Volatile  Acids
 o
 re
 u
 u
 o
 ro
 CD
O

-------
     mean, geometric standard deviation, and number of observations, pro-
     viding a genera] picture of the data spread or fluctuation.  The plot-
     tings for volatile ac4ds and alkalinity of sludges from both the WSW
     plant and Lawndale lagoons approximate two straight segments with a
     break point.  Probably this is attributable to digester performance
     or to the different ages of sludge in the lagoons.

          Properly digested sludge generally has high alkalinity and low
     volatile acids.  Total solids and total volatile solids are less sen-
     sitive sludge quality indicators than are volatile acids or alkalinity.
     Sludge quality was compared with applicable sludge quality standards
     specified in the operating permit issued to the MSDGC.   The applicable
     standards and the results of the comparative study are  summarized in
     Table VII-1.  In addition to the four parameters cited  above, the pH
     value is included.  Based on the length of the monitoring period, the
     number of samples, and the applicable standards, the number of viola-
     tions permitted was calculated and indicated in Table VII-1.  Compliance
     of sludge quality with applicable standards is determined by comparing
     the actual number of violations with the permissible number.

          Sludge originating from the Lawndale lagoons has a generally higher
     quality than sludge from the WSW plant digesters, which is attributable
     to the aging of sludge.in the lagoons.  Sludge from the lagoons occas-
     ionally exceeds the standard for total alkalinity.  Sludge drawn from
     the digesters is sometimes substandard in terms of total volatile solids,
     alkalinity, and/or pH.  Violation frequencies are summarized below in
     Table VII-2.
  Table VII-2.   Compliance of Sludge Quality with Applicable Standards
                 As of May 1975 (MSDGC, 1972a through 1975g;  Enviro Control,
                 Inc., 1976)
                      Total
                  Volatile Solids   Volatile Acids    Alkalinity          pH
Sludge from
Lawndale Lagoons
Sludge from
WSW Plant
Total
compliance
Violated 3.8%
of the time
Total
compliance
Total
compliance
Violated 9.5%
of the time
Violated 1.4%
of the time
Total
compliance
Violated 1.3%
of the time
                                    VII-7

-------
n-
o









a











>r~~~
-(-> ro
•r- O
c o
•r- to
I — t_J
-*£ (/
<--






^-
•O -i-
•*- u
0  ra




wi
-a


o

r—
ro ai

O i-
*~ ro
o


to
"O


o
c/l

"re
•t->
o
h-












i
E ro ai
0 E •
O ^O
OJ
• f— C
-fei-J
1 TO 4->

OJ 01
QJ in
O 4J QJ
Z ..-r-
>> C
TO E
OJ E

O i/i >,ur
O TO *
S-S CXT3 OJ
to E
O O C
C U CO ^
JZ • C 4-J
4-» S- •^•
J= L.
 VI _Q
C
1 (/> -r-
OJ r- r—
QJ E cn

•1— ,

E -C
O t! TO O
z: ^ E ro
(U VI
•r- "O -^
t/1 QJ r~
O QJ O
O- U 
1 OJ «4-
^1"°
O TO OJ
Z Ul UD
QJ
r^

to


TO
<
+J
O



t/1
1
•a
c
ro
4->
tn





5
o-
a;
01
•o
3
Cyl
OJ

JD

U


CL
a.








P^













C»1
*—














01

















0












r-.
^
l~~







i/i
QJ

Q
E
TO
OO

4-
O
S-
OJ
"=
3

c
TO

z:

u



£

£





r-


«—
01
E
§
cc
ro








,__

p


OJ

















_














*=*"










c:
TO



U

^


QJ
CJ3



r—

TO
U


ex
ex


o









r
f—














UD

















,_«












CO




c
0
TO

QJ
Q
S_
TO

C
TO
4->
OO

u

4->


QJ








O















-















tn

















Q







QJ
-Q
TO
(J


a
£
-M
O
-o
QJ
4->

E
QJ
Q_
trt
C
O
£
TO

'o


<4-
o

jO








o















0
OJ















o

















o







QJ
_Q
TO
U


ex
ex
4J
O

t/1

0
TO
'o


<4-
O


O
2:

TO
.J3
U



o

4- r- V)
TO C
QJ XJ O
en c O
-o 3 en


00








cn
CO













OJ
OJ
OJ














r—

OO















f~^

CC











o^
OO







V)
QJ

I
TO
OO

M-
O
S_
QJ
•9


c

Q.
s:

u


QJ


£
S-




CO


1 —
"c?

s
c\
"f








, 	

cn
E

LT

















^-
LO













CO










C
TO
QJ
s:

u

53
0)
0
QJ



QJ


^
l_


CL
c


c









OJ
r—














^C

















1—














' —


c
o
TO

QJ
Q
"^
TO
•a
TO
4-)
OO

(J

b
1J
6
OJ
























^















^

















Q







QJ
.£3
TO
O


o
o
e£

O
QJ
^j

E
QJ
a.
wi

5

TO

O



O

o








LT)















*















r—

















un







QJ
_Q

U


ex
ex
«^
4-9
0

l/l
C
o
-t-J
TO
'o


^
o


o

—
TO
^




6 4J
s. c
»t- TO

QJ a.
en
"0 3
^3 OO

OO
                                VII-8

-------
               Sludge applied to the project fields is sampled at pumping sta-
          tions, and its characteristics are summarized in Table VII-3.  Be-
          cause there are no standards designated for sludge applied to the
          fields, no comparative study was undertaken.  In 1973, the total sol-
          ids content of sludge applied to the fields in Fulton County ranged
          from 0.18 to 0.71%, which resembles the content of supernatant in
          the sludge holding basins.  It follows, therefore, that supernatant
          was not mixed with the bottom sludge in the holding basins, and
          only the supernatant was applied to the fields in 1973.  This is
          further supported by the consistently high pH values and low concen-
          trations of total phosphorus, Kjeldahl   nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen,
          cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc which are associ-
          ated with sludge particles.

          2.   Sludge Routes and Quantities

               Sludges may originate from the WSW treatment plant or from the
          Lawndale lagoons, or combination from the two.  These sludges are
          barged to the Liverpool dock and pumped to the four holding basins.
          A portion of the supernatant in the holding basins is occasionally
          barged back to either the WSW plant or to the Chicago Lawndale la-
          goons.  During application seasons, sludge is pumped to various
          fields by a distribution system (see Figure VII-9 below).
Sludge from WSW plant,
or Lawndale lagoons, or
combination of both, F^
        r
Holding basins,
      (capacity = 8 million
      \cubic yards)
         Supernatant return
         to either WSW plant
         or Lawndale lagoons, Fr
Sludge Application Fields
                  Sludge Applied
                  to Fields, Ff
                        Figure VII-9.   Flow Diagram of Sludge
                                          VII-9

-------
T3 1^
i— cn
 03 •—
 o  c
 HI i—.
+J  O
   o
T3 T-

.2  c
i — LU
Q.
Q. ..

*-  o
O  !-
•i- cn
 i. i—
 aj
4->   «
 o o
 /a o
 u o
^ E
Z Cn
£Z
Sl
-O -v
Q_ cr
<_> cn
E
s- -^
"1
•o -x.
"1
c
••- en.—
C 0 -^
§s- cr
•M S
«£ Z
i — C
-C CD-—
10 cn.—
T3 0 ~-,
— i. cr
J ;
OJ •— 5 /
cn— i./
1X1 /
/ *
/ 01
/ ^
-*-)
' c
o
ir>
un
CO
LT>
CM

LT)
in
CO
cn
CM
cn
m
o
0
CM
cn
CO
cn
un
cn
CM
0
in
co
m
r^
CD
C
C
>•
rO
S
cnjco
^CM
CO
un
CO
CO
c
CM
j
0

co
0
^
CM
0
£
co
S
cn
cn
cn
CM
J£2
un
cn
cn
co
CO
CM
0
uo
o
co
co
1 — •
1 —
C0£
o
cn
CO
o
CO
^
cn
CM
CO
CO
cn un
• CM
CO
ro co
O CM

LO
CM
cn
LO
'~~
UD
cn
CM
O
CM
px.
10
un
cn
i —
*r
^
0
_
CO
August, 1973
September, 1973
October, 1973


to
LO
CO
CM
*±
LO
LO
LO
I —

0
CO
cn
CT>
LO
CXI
cn
cn

cn

>>
CO


CO
r-.
•—
CM
CO
r-
cn
LO
*r
o

CO
CO
CO
r—
co
<£>
CTI
S

CM
CM
CO
CO
r-.
*3-
LO

cn


CO
CM
CO
j
£
CM
CD
cn
-
o

CO

OJ
c
a
CO
CD
US
ss

^

P-.
cn
CO
to
f~~
cn
i —
0
o
s
i
CO
0
CM
CO
cn
LO
r-
co

LO
CO

CM

;^
cn
cn
l£l
o
0

^
—

0
to
CM

^Jcn"
H -
CM —
s
..

•a-
^

4-J
CO
D
cn
3
CO
CO
CO
CO
uo

en
03
S
4->
Q-
OJ


cn

-------
     The amounts of barged sludge and supernatant are summarized in
Table VII-4.  The total sludge shipped to the holding basins amounted
to 1,397.5 million gallons or 5.7 million net tons from April  1972 to
May 1975.  Supernatant return totaled 477.4 million gallons or 1.98
million wet tons during the same period.   Based on the average total
solids concentrations (see Table VII-3,  page VII-10) and total wet tons
of sludge applied to the project fields,  the cumulative fluid  volume
of sludge applied is estimated to ba 244.8 million gallons through
an application period of 13 months, beginning in April 1972 and end-
ing in May 1975.

     The average sludge storage time in  the holding basins can be es-
timated by a number of methods.  Because  the holding basins were never
used at full capacity, a conservative method for estimating the aver-
age storage time is as follows:

            Fb - Fr      (1397.5-477.4)  x IP6 gal
     *«  =  ~ff~~  =  (244.8 x 106 gal/13 months) = 49 months

          Where  t$ = average storage time
                 Fb = sludge barged to the holding basins
                 Fr = supernatant returned to Chicago
            and  Ff = sludge applied to  fields

This estimation is considered to be conservative because it does not
account for loss of sludge water by evaporation.  A storage time of
49 months is considerably long, and is a  result of low sludge  applica-
tion rates during the development stages  of the project

     The application rate was originally  proposed to be 70 dry tons
per acre per year in the first year and  taper down to 20 dt/acre/year
in the fifth year of operations (Dalton  and Murphy, 1973).  These
rates correspond to 726.5 and 207.6 million gallons of sludge, based
on a 4% total solids content, applied to  Fields #1 through #38, hav-
ing a total area of 1,731.6 acres.  Accordingly, the mean storage
                               VII-11

-------
3
O
u

c
o
IO
03
o
3:

01
ai
CL
3
1/5

•a
c
ia

tu
01











o


•o
Ol
1
01
ce


c
+J
IO

i.
0)
Q.
3
CO


























••
§
i.
M-

•o
Ol

c_
IO
CQ
01
Ol
•o
3

CO






















in
c
o
0
o
IO
	 I
Ol

IO
T3
c
2
IO
	 1









4J
C
IO

Q.

3
CO




01

IO
•o
c
2

1C
a.
3
3





£
e
»•
L
C


C
0
1—

+J
01



c
o

r—
10
CJ

IO
O



CO
C
o
H-


Ol
3




C
o

la
CD
IO
o
eo
C
o
i—

4J
01
3

en
c
o


10
o

10
o
c
o
I—
4J
3



CO
^
O

10
ID

vo
0

s
1—

a>
3

in
a
r—
KO
CD
10
O



^
J
L.


i i i i i i k o r^ t cn to
I 1 1 1 I 1 I UD CO i «— V£>
n to in «3-

00 O LO -^
CM i — CM tD






i i i i i t i 1%. m i o co

^ CM in *f




t I I^OCTlOCOCTiCMrOr- CO

r^ r— r*^ co ^~ co r*1** co CM
COCTlljD^Or— LnmCM *&
O CM U3 r^. r^. CM co p—


, —






1 1 ICOU3O*d-tOi— *S-CM O
•^OOP^^t-PO^-* CO
CMLOCOCO^i— OP^ ^O
p— 1— ^>

i i i ir^iir^r^ico,^-
ro r— o co co

r^. co r** CM ^~

r~~ CM CO *™ Ol




1 1 1 I O 1 1 CO GO 1 <• O
1 1 1 1 • 1 1 • ' 1 •
r-*. ro (**«. ro CM

CM


i i i r*. en t r— o i i i r-v
ItlCMCMlCMLOlll CM
«r *— co ^o LO
VO ^3- r- CO C3*
CO CM CM CT>






1 1 tCOCOICQCMi 1 1 ^O
1 I ILOr— lOCOl 1 t UO


CM



l51§ISsS52l §
Or^f— cn^j-r>.r^cMir>CTtp^. co
ol»rv.^-^J•tnmr-OP>«.p^.^^ to
A
«3-


COlfttnr— Lr>r-.r-OCTtr— CM Ol
SooSScSSj^S!?^^? 3
*— P— »— •— r— r- r-
r-^

cortro^nfl-^^^uo
01 cy> o^ o> 01 01 01 01 01 01

ifc^ilii^^iiic ^
vvamnnanmn^ °
cro-o-o-o-o-o-o-cro- ' 3
&-cnci-4->t/)Ci--i->j
*^
in

0

CO
c
o

1C


c
o

s
CO
(^
31
*t
•—










, —
O





























































































                                  VII-12

-------
times would have been 15.2 and 53.2 months, respectively.   Because it
is desirable to provide at least a 6-month storage or retention time,
the ultimate acreage application of fields that should be  developed
can be estimated as follows:
       Maximum Acreage  =  Total Volume of Holding Basins
                    3      Sludge Application per 6 Months

Based on a 20 dt/acre/year application rate and a 4% solids content,
the ultimate acreage of application fields would be approximately
26,960.
     Some substandard sludge is known to have been shipped to the pro-
ject site.  Subsequent environmental effects resulting from transport-
ing substandard sludge cannot be assessed because sludge actually ap-
plied may have very different characteristics, depending on time in
storage, mixing with supernatant, and so forth.  However, any air pol-
lution from sludge odors and aerosolization and contamination of sur-
face water, groundwater and soil from sludge application would be com-
plicated and abetted by continued shipment of subgrade sludge.  As for
the quality of applied sludge, it is important to bear in mind that any
adverse environmental effects estimated from previous sludge applica-
tions may substantially understate their potential because the pollutant
concentrations in sludge applied during the past developmental period
have been atypically low.  Also, average retention time in the hold-
ing basins has been much longer than planned.

     A procedure must be implemented to ensure that only good
quality sludge is shipped to Fulton County.  Substandard sludge
must be stored prior to shipment until  its quality conforms with
required standards.  The capacity of the holding basins provides
for a sufficiently long storage time, which should guarantee the
destruction of pathogens in the sludge, but this does not alle-
viate the potential for odor problems,  especially those associa-
ted with substandard sludge.  Therefore, prolonged storage of
sludge in the Lawndale lagoons prior to shipment to Fulton County
is recommended as a mitigative measure.
                                VII-13

-------
B.   THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN  ODOR EMISSION

     Odor is defined as  the sensation  of smell  perceived as  a  result of ol-
factory stimulation by an odorant.   Odorants  range from inorganic gases
and vapors to the full spectrum of  organic  compounds.   Many  malodorous sub-
stances, including mercaptans,  hydrogen sulfides,  sulfides,  organic sulfur
homologues, ammonia, decayed bacteria,  and  partially  oxidized  complex or-
ganics or amines have been identified  in sludge from  anaerobic digesters.
These odorants are generated by microbiological activity in  the sludge.
Odor can be described by quality and intensity.  The  problems  encountered
in odor assessment for this study include:

     •    Mechanisms of  odor generation
     •    Spectra of odorants from  digested sludge
     •    Sources of odor emission
     t    Factors of odor emission  strength such as sludge quality
          and extent of  treatment
     •    Accuracy of odor identification and measurement.

     Theoretical considerations in  odor emission and  detection are pre-
sented in this section to facilitate an understanding  and subsequent as-
sessment of the odor potential  of sludge holding basins  and  of alternative
sludge application methods at the project site.

     1.   Aerosolization and Volatilization

          Emission of odor from liquid  sludge occurs  by  aerosolization and
     volatilization.  Volatilization or evaporation of chemical  substances
     in water is influenced by  air  temperature  and humidity, wind speed,
     and turbulence in the water body.   The rate of evaporation depends
     upon the mass transfer rate of the chemical species in  either the
     fluids or liquid phase. For low-solubility gases such  as alkanes
     or mercury, the evaporation rate  is liquid phase  controlled; that is,
     the chemical species encounters more resistance  in  escaping from the
                                    VII-14

-------
  liquid phase than from entering the gaseous phase.   The evaporation
  rate of water soluble gases such as sulfur dioxide  is vapor phase
  controlled.

       Evaporation potential of a compound is indicated by half-life.
  Evaporative half-life  is  defined as the  time required for evaporation
  to reduce the bulk concentration of a dissolved compound to half of
  its original concentration.  The term is always accompanied by the
  depth of the water body because of possible stratification.  Each
  stratum has a different mixing or turbulence regime.   The solubility,
                                                                      t
  vapor pressure, and half-life of some contaminants  in a water body
  with a depth of one meter are given below in Table  VII-5.  The table
  shows that most of these compounds evaporate rapidly from solution.
Table VII-5.
Solubility, Vapor Pressure and Evaporative Half-Life
of Chemicals in Aqueous Solution at 25°C  (Mackay and
Leinonen, 1975)


Compound
n-Octane
Benzene
Toluene
o-Xylene
Biphenyl
DDT
Aldrin
Mercury
Solubility
(mg/1 )
0.66
1,780
515
175
7.48
1.2 x 10"-3
0.2
3 x 10"^
Vapor Pressure
(mm Hg)
14.1
95.2
28.4
6.6
0.057
1 x 10'7
6 x 10'6
1.3 x lO'3
Ha If -Life
(hrs, 1m depth)
5.55
4.81
5.18
5.61
7.52
73.9
185
7.53

       When the water body is turbulent with rapid exchange of prop-
  erties between the surface layer and the bulk,  or during white-capping
  on a lake or ocean, the evaporation rate may increase.   Low relative
  humidity and high temperature encourage evaporation,  and vice versa.
  However, the influence of these factors on the  evaporation of low-
  solubility chemicals is limited, because the mass transfer rates  and
                               VII-15

-------
aqueous solubilities of these substances  are relatively insensitive
to temperature.   The effects of temperature on the vapor pressures
of highly soluble substances, such as  sulfur dioxide,can significantly
influence the evaporation rate (Mackay and Leinonen,  1975).   The ef-
fect of temperature on the evaporation of substances  of intermediate
solubility such as hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, or ammonia,  is moder-
ate (Fair, Geyer, and Morris, 1954).

     When sewage sludge is stored in holding basins,  volatilization
may be the dominant mechanism for the release of odor-producing sub-
stances, unless white-capping occurs.   White caps signify the pre-
sence of air bubbles collapsing at the water surface,  generating min-
ute airborne water droplets known as liquid aerosols.   Evaporation
from liquid aerosols can be significantly higher than evaporation from
a plane water surface or a water body of  equalized mass.  This is be-
cause aerosolization increases the amount of surface  area exposed to
the atmosphere.

     As aerosols decrease in size, vapor  pressure increases at the
droplet surface, further encouraging evaporation.  However, evapora-
tion increases the salt concentration of  a liquid aerosol,  decreasing
vapor pressure and correspondingly decreasing evaporation rates (Squire,
1951).  In addition, the ventilation effects around a liquid aerosol,
as determined by terminal settling velocity, aerosol  size,  and inter-
nal circulation currents, can influence evaporation to a minor extent
(Fletcher, 1962; Hanna, 1974).

2.   Ammonia and Other Emission Sources

     Odor emissions from sludge applied to soil may occur by mechan-
isms other than aerosolization and volatilization.  For example, am-
monia may undergo a series of physical, chemical, and biological reac-
tions after sludge is sprayed on or incorporated into soil.  Ammonia
nitrogen may be adsorbed in  the lattices  of clay particles or remain
freely  soluble in the soil solution.  The adsorbed ammonia may be
                               VII-16

-------
fixed with clay molecules or held by cation exchange sites on clay
particles, and is readily exchangeable with other anions in the soil.
Water soluble ammonia also remains in the soil.  The ammonia lost
from the soil is either volatilized as gaseous ammonia or released
as nitrogen gas by microbial nitrification and denitrification reac-
tions.  The extent of these reactions and the distribution of ammonia
in the soil, liquid, or gaseous phases depends on:

     t    Sludge quality and quantity
     •    Season of sludge application
     •    Decomposition rate of sludge organic matter
     •    Fertility of the spoil material
     •    Soil moisture content
     •    Soil pH and clay mineralogy
     •    Availability of air in the soil
     •    Vegetative cover
     •    Rainfall and temperature
     t    Miscellaneous meteorological factors.

     The MSDGC conducted a study of ammonia volatilization from a
sludge-treated calcareous mine spoil.  The study revealed that at
25°C, more than 43% of the ammonia nitrogen added to the soil  vola-
tilizes into the atmosphere one week after sludge application.  This
value represented nearly the total amount of nitrogen that would be
volatilized (MSDGC, 1974).  This phenomenon is rather independent of
the sludge application rate.  The application rates tested in the
study were zero, 10, 20, and 40 dry tons of sludge per acre of spoil
land.  Based on an ammonia nitrogen content of 1,540 milligrams per
liter and a sludge application rate of 40 dry tons per acre, approxi-
mately 768 pounds per acre of ammonia nitrogen were volatilized,  398
pounds of ammonia nitrogen were fixed by clay minerals, and 282 pounds
were in water soluble and exchangeable form available for plant nutri-
tion (MSDGC, 1974).  These figures ignore mineralization of organic
nitrogen and immobilization of inorganic nitrogen by bacteria.
                               VII-17

-------
     It must be noted that many chemicals  or sludge constituents
may be responsible for odor generation.  These may undergo reac-
tions similar to those for ammonia nitrogen or they may react dif-
ferently.  For example, hydrogen sulfide may be volatilized,  oxi-
dized to sulfate by chemical  or biological  reactions,  precipitated
by cations to form less soluble sulfide  compounds, converted  to other
complex compounds, or assimilated by bacteria for biomass  synthesis.
The emission of a given malodorant is therefore the consequence of
a complicated chemical and microbiological  system for  which no ac-
curate method of quantification or model is as yet available.

     The odor emission potential of sludge is determined,  in  part,
by sludge characteristics, which, in turn, are partially determined
by the type and extent of previous sludge  treatment.   As a general
rule, fresh sludge produces more odor than digested sludge, and,
odor associated with aerobically digested  sludge is less of a prob-
lem than that with anaerobical ly digested  sludge.   Properly stabil=-
ized sludge should have a pH value higher  than neutral, high  alka-
linity, and low levels of volatile solids  and acids.

3.   Identification and Measurement of Odor

     Identification and measurement of industrial  odors have  been
studied for several decades, but studies of odors from municipal
wastewater and sludge are quite limited.   The two types of odor mea-
surements are source and ambient measurements.  Generally, higher
odor concentrations are encountered at the source than at a distance
downwind.  Source measurement procedures are therefore different from
those for ambient measurement.   However, the means of  detecting or
measuring odor in either instance are similar.  Odor is detected and
rated by the use of either human smell or  mechanical  instruments.

     a.   Sensory identification - The human nose is highly sensitive
     to many odors at extremely low concentrations, but is incapable
     of accurate, reproducible odor determinations.  Human smell is
                                 VII-18

-------
affected by physiological factors such as age and health of the
subject.  Measurement techniques can be utilized to improve the
reliability of sensory detection; the most common technique is
the mixing or dilution method.  An odor sample is diluted with
pure air before being administered to a test panel of human sub-
jects.  Usually a series of diluted samples is prepared and given
to the panel in descending order of dilution.  Pure air is ad-
ministered between each sample to sensitize the panel and to pre-
vent olfactory fatigue.  The odor threshold is defined as the con-
centration below which human smell cannot differentiate the sample
from pure air.  Table VI1-6 presents the odor threshold and odor
description for some chemicals.

     The strength of an odor can conveniently be expressed in
terms of its threshold value.  There is the so-called odor unit,
which is defined as the volumetric ratio of clean or odor-free
air necessary to dilute an odor sample, so that 50% of the test
panel cannot detect the odor (ASTM, D1391-57).  For example, if
an odor has strength of 1,000 odor units, it will take 1,000 cubic
feet of pure air to dilute one cubic foot of the odorant so that
50% of the subjects will detect odor in the mixture.  Odor sam-
ples can be taken by syringe, bag, or gas containers with the
aid of sampling techniques used for air quality studies.  The
purity of odor substances, design of odor test facilities, me-
thods of sampling and threshold determinations may all influence
sensory detection of odor.

b.   Chemical detection - More objective methods of odor eval-
uation have been attempted for years.  These include wet chemis-
try, colorimetry, chromatography, and, recently, mass spectro-
metry.  Wet chemical or colorimetric methods are chemical speci-
fic and suitable for single odorants and high odor concentra-
tions.  These methods have been used successfully for^some odor-
producing substances and sometimes correlate with the subjective
findings of an odor test panel, but are far from satisfactory
when multiple odorants coexist.


                           VII-19

-------
  Table VII-6.    Odor Thresholds and Descriptions (Leonardos,  et al.,  1969}
      Chemical
Acetaldehyde
Acetic acid
Acetone
Amine, dimethyl
Amine, trimethyl
Ammonia
Benzene
Butyric acid
Carbon disulfide
Chlorine
Diphenyl sulfide
Ethyl mercaptan
Hydrogen sulfide gas
Methanol
Methyl mercaptan
Nitrobenzene
Phenol
Pyridine
Toluene (from  coke)
Odor Threshold (ppm)
     0.21
     1.0
    100.0
     0.047
     0.00021
    46.8
     4.68
     0.001
     0.21
     0.314
     0.0047
     0.001
     0.00047
    100.0
     0.0021
     0.0047
     0.047
     0.021
     4.68
    Odor Description	
Green sweet
Sour
Chemical sweet, pungent
Fishy
Fishy, pungent
Pungent
Solvent
Sour
Vegetable sulfide
Bleach, pungent
Burnt rubbery
Earthy, sulfidy
Eggy sulfide
Sweet
Sulfidy, pungent
Shoe polish, pungent
Medicinal
Burnt, pungent
Floral, pungent, solventy
                                    VII-20

-------
     Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry offer promising
potential for odor identification and quantification because of
their sensitivity to low chemical concentrations, reproducibility,
and ability to verify and quantify multiple odorant mixtures.  In
applying these methods, a sample is drawn through a tube and odor-
ants are "fixed" or  "frozen" by coolants such as liquid nitrogen.
The sample is brought to the laboratory and subjected to a pro-
grammed heating sequence.  The release of chemicals from the sam-
ple are temperature dependent and thus follow the pre-programmed
sequence.  Separation of the chemicals is achieved by the succes-
sive release and passage of a given chemical through the gas chro-
matrograph or mass spectrometer, which identifies.:and quantifies
the chemical.  These two methods have the drawback of being unable
to describe the composite quality of multi-odorants.

     The accuracy and reproducibility of odor measurements rely
also upon field conditions such as source characteristics and mete-
orological factors.  Source strength is often neither constant in
time nor uniform in space.  The transient nature of an odor source
makes the assessment of odor potential difficult, even though source
strength can be determined accurately at a given moment and at a
fixed receptor.  Furthermore, the determination of long-term emis-
sion strength requires numerous short-term observations.

c.   Ambient measurement - Upon leaving the source, physical and
chemical atmospheric processes reduce the concentration of odor-
ants by dilution, dispersion, and conversion.  The dispersion of
odorants is governed primarily by thermal and mechanical turbu-
lence in the atmosphere, which are, in turn, determined by atmos-
pheric stability, solar insolation or cloud cover, wind vectors,
and other meterological parameters.  Odor problems are primarily
of local rather than regional concern.  Therefore, topographical
modification of regional meterological phenomena has a significant
influence upon local transport and dispersion of odorants.  Chan-
nelization of wind by local terrain and differential heating by
land and water are the most significant topographical influences.
                         VII-21

-------
     Receptors downwind from a constant-strength odor source will
detect fluctuations in odor concentration resulting from wind shift
and atmospheric turbulence.  Consequently, short-term concentrations
are always higher than long-term averages.  For a period of more
than 30 minutes, the downwind odor concentration usually forms a
cross-wind profile which peaks directly downwind from the source,
and decreases in both the downwind and cross-wind directions as
a greater volume of clean air is available for dilution with in-
creasing distance.

     To predict the worst and the most probable concentrations and
their occurring frequencies at a given location, daytime and night-
time observations are necessary.  If seasonal  variations are to be
established, observations must be conducted over several seasons
or years.  Along with ambient measurements, source characteristics
and meteorological parameters must be observed in order to corre-
late ambient odor levels with their influencing factors.  However,
for a rough terrain, the wind field is drastically modified by ter-
rain features, and measurements taken at a hillside and at the bottom
of a valley will differ because of wind chanelling, trapping, or lee
wake effects.  The location of a sampling station can therefore be
crucial.

     In view of the major requirements for successful odor measure-
ment, problems and uncertainties can be anticipated.   For example,
daytime observations must not be applied to a  nighttime situation,
because daytime and nighttime emission characteristics and atmos-
pheric conditions are quite different.  For instance, radiational
inversions occur more freuqently at night.  Also, short-term obser-
vations cannot form the basis for long-term projections.

     Because the synergistic and antagonistic  phenomena of many co-
existing odorants are not understood, measurement of individual  odor-
ants cannot be integrated to render a composite assessment that will
correlate with human response.  Because of limitations on instrument
accuracy and measurement reproducibility, and  because of constraints
of time, resources and field conditions, odor  assessments are gen-
erally non-quantitative.
                           VII-22

-------
C-    ODOR POTENTIAL OF SLUDGE HGLCING BASINS

     Odor monitoring conducted at the project site includes odor verification
by the Midwest Research Institute and atmospheric ammonia monitoring at the
holding basins by the MSDGC.   These monitoring programs are discussed in the
following section, along with an estimate of the atmospheric dilution capa-
city around the sludge holding basins.   Potential odor impacts and measures
to mitigate adverse effects of odor dispersion are presented at the conclu-
sion.

     1.   Odor Complaint Data

          The odor verification program undertaken by the Midwest Research
     Institute (MRI) under contract with the Fulton County Health Department
     was designed to pinpoint the source of an odor after a citizen complaint
     arose.  Health Department personnel sent air samples from the complaint
     site to MRI for analysis by gas chromatography.  This technique pro-
     duces a chart containing a series  of peaks, each peak corresponding to
     an individual chemical compound in the sample.  The chart of the sam-
     ple from the complaint site was compared with those of samples collec-
     ted at possible odor sources in the project area.  These sources in-
     cluded the MSDGC sludge holding basins, the sludge spraying operation
     on MSDGC property, the Canton sewage treatment plant, a cattle feedlot,
     and the gob piles arid septic tanks common to the area.

          The chromatographic analysis neither quantified odor intensity
     nor identified the chemical components of the samples.  A series of
     "finger print" matchings was proposed to identify the responsible odor
     source.  This approach was proven  to be unsatisfactory in correlating
     odor complaints with any of the individual  odor sources sampled.  From
     the matching analysis of eight odor complaints, it was concluded that
     the probability of the odor originating from MSDGC sources was 0.71.

          Figure VII-10 delineates the odor complaint sites and the wind
     direction and velocity at the time the complaints were made.  The sites
     of the complaints indicate that the odors originated from the vicinity
     of the MSDGC property.
                                   VII-23

-------
                                                                     ,CANTON

                                                                     "
                    ;           11^^%

                   II           HI   j^Cj
                   jli^i... j-i"-1  u"Ji;-^%
                   I  i                <$^     ':
                                                                            ILL 9
                                                                                     N
                                                                                     r
                                                                              ' I .eip>)0l t iverpool
                                                                              i«fp  1 wsp E
                                                                 •  Odor  Complaint  Site


                                                                    Upwind  Direction
                                                                  5
                                                                .  . I
10
 I
15
 i
                                                               Wind Speed - MPH
fD
l/i
ro
OJ
-5
o
(,1
f-f
n-
c
ro
                                        VII-24

-------
2.    Atmospheric Ammonia Data

     MSDGC personnel have been measuring atmospheric ammonia concentra-
tions near the sludge holding basins since August 1973 (MSDGC, 1972a
through 1975g).  Samples are collected at the berm on the downwind side
of the basins.  Surface wind speed and direction, air temperature, and
dew point are noted during the sampling period.   The corresponding rela-
tive humidity can be calculated from the measured air temperature and
dew point.  (A sample data sheet is shown in Table III-5, page 111-29.)

     The ammonia study alone cannot satisfactorily disclose the magni-
tude of odor problems.  This is supported by the fact that an earthy
smell rather than a pungent ammonia odor was noticed during a field trip
within the project property.  Other odorants could therefore be present.
The study of atmospheric ammonia does, however,  help to understand the
mechanisms of odor generation and odor impacts.

     a.   Influence of air temperature and humidity - As previously dis-
     cussed, chemicals are liberated from a liquid solution by volatili-
     zation and aerosolization.  The volatilization rate of ammonia de-
     pends on the aqueous ammonia concentration in the bulk water body,
     its atmospheric vapor pressure, and ambient temperature.  Stratifi-
     cation occurring as a result of solid-liquid separation is expected
     to be very stable to 5 meters below the water surface of the holding
     basins (shown in Figure III-4, page III-6).  The exchange of chemi-
     cals and heat between the bottom sediments and the supernatant are
     expected to be insignificant.  Therefore, the volatilization rate
     in the liquid phase depends primarily on the ammonia concentration
     in the supernatant, which remains quite constant.

          To examine the influence of ambient air temperature on ammonia
     liberation from the sludge holding basins,  atmospheric ammonia con-
     centrations are plotted against air temperature in Figure VII-11.
     Disregarding wind speed and atmospheric humidity, which may affect
                               VII-25

-------
LT>
             	i.
                                   ^^:
                                     i>
                          +

                        - >







.


K. o+ c
j\* '
< ^N^ 0
<>Nfl 0,.X
* X t *
>^
o
0
a
                 •a
                 
                                                                  06 O
                                                                    Q> b- {>
                                                                .4_»
                                                                            -»—r

                                                                            A^
                                                                                               en
                                                                                              o
                  I  t    I
                                   It   I    I   I   I    I
           (UJdd)
                                                     BLUOLLIII1V
                                               VII-26

-------
the volatilization rate, atmospheric ammonia concentration corre-
lates well with ambient air temperature.  Using the least square
method with 235 observations, the best-fit straight line correla-
tion yields a slope of 0.06 ppm per degree (°C), meaning that a
10°C temperature increase causes an increase of 0.6 ppm in source
ammonia concentration at the sludge holding basins.  A logarithmic
correlation may generalize this positive correlation more satis-
factorily without risking negative ammonia values in low tempera-
ture ranges.  The logarithmic correlation may be approximated by
the dashed curve in Figure VII-11  (page VII-26).

     Apparently the vertical spreading of data points for a given
air temperature in Figure VII-11  results, at least partially, from
humidity variation.  Disregarding the wind effects on atmospheric
ammonia, the relationship between atmospheric ammonia and air tem-
perature for an increment of relative humidity was analyzed.   The
relative humidity intervals used for analysis are 60-70, 71-80,
84-90, arid 90-100%.  The slope of correlation ranges from 0.066
to 0.088 ppm/°C with the steepest slope associated with the lowest
humidity and vice versa, as expected.  This confirms that low rela-
tive humidity encourages evaporation or volatilization of ammonia
for a given temperature increment.

b.   Influence of wind speed and direction - To demonstrate the
effect of wind on ammonia volatilization and aerosolization,  at-
mospheric ammonia concentration was plotted against air tempera-
ture for seven wind speed intervals:  0-3, 3.1-6, 6.1-9.0, 9.1-
12.0, 12.1-15.0, 15.1-18.0, and greater than 18.0 mph (these  are
shown separately in Appendix B).   The number of observations  ranges
from 19 to 42.  The slopes of correlation range from 0.045 to
0.069 ppm/°C.  The highest wind speed interval has a correlation
slope of 0.057 ppm/°C, which falls in the middle of the range of
variation.

     At a given temperature, the concentration of ammonia is  ap-
proximately equal for all seven wind intervals.  Because storm
winds cause high horizontal advection or dispersion capacity,

                          VII-27

-------
sludge in the holding basins must possess a high ammonia emission
strength during windy-periods in order to maintain a constant
level of atmospheric ammonia over the basin surface.  Because the
effects of temperature on ammonia volatilization are limited, in-
creased emission strength is probably due to wind turbulence caus-
ing white-capping and aerosolization of sludge.   A theoretical es-
timation using Turner's diffusion model reveals  a linear relation-
ship between emission strength increase and the  increase in wind
speed (Turner, 1970).  For example, when wind speed is increased
from 10 mph to 15 mph, the emission strength is  increased by 50%.

     The frequency of wind of a given speed and  direction is gov-
erned by regional meteorological events and topographical features.
This phenomenon is depicted in the "wind rose" in Figure IV-4
(page IV-9). This directional wind frequency distribution results
in a directional distribution of atmospheric ammonia.  The percent
occurrence of a range of ammonia concentrations  in different direc-
tions is presented in Figure VII-12 and is referred to as an "am-
monia rose".

     Ammonia concentrations are broken into five intervals:  0-0.5,
0.51-1.0, 1V01-1.50, 1.51-2.0, and greater than  2.00 ppm.  Eight
directions or sectors are represented by bars.  The probability of
a given ammonia concentration occurring in a given sector is pro-
portional to the length of its representative segment.  The inner-
most segment represents the lowest ammonia concentration interval.
As shown in the "ammonia rose", the southwesterly and southerly
directions are associated with the low frequencies of ammonia con-
centration.  The northerly directions are associated with the high-
est frequencies of high ammonia concentrations.

c.   Frequencies of source concentrations - The source concentra-
tion of ammonia is quite variable and is multiple-parameter depen-
dent.  Among  these parameters, air temperature and wind speed have
                          VII-28

-------
0

H-r-T
        10%
•  '
              Figure VII-12.
                'Ammonia Rose"; Directional Annual Per-
                cent Frequency of Ammonia Concentration
                at the Project Site in the Ranges of 0-
                0.5, 0.51-1.0, 1.01-1.50, 1.51-2.0, and
                2.01 ppm or Higher (MSDGC, 1972a through
                1975g).
                                       VII-29

-------
the most pronounced influence.   Disregarding wind direction, the
frequencies of ammonia concentrations  less  than or equal  to a
designated value are presented  in Figure VII-13.

     A combination of high ammonia concentration in the sludge,
high temperature, low relative  humidity, stable atmosphere, low
mixing height, and no precipitation may generate a very high
source concentration of atmospheric ammonia.   However,  the like-
lihood of this situation occurring is  rather remote,  as these
conditions rarely coexist.  From the analysis of meteorological
records presented in Chapter IV, the joint  frequency  of a calm
atmosphere (F), low mixing height (100m) and light wind (1 mph)
is 0.2678%, or 24 hours in a year.   However,  if worst conditions
do occur, a source of concentration of approximately  4.8 ppm
would be expected, according to Figure VII-13.   Statistical analy-
sis of ammonia observations show the geometric  mean which occurs
50% of the time, to be approximately 0.5 ppm, which is  equivalent
to one-hundredth of the ammonia threshold.

     The concentration approximated for worst conditions was ex-
ceeded only once during the monitoring period between August 1973
and May 1975, and is only one-tenth of the  ammonia threshold of
46.'8 ppm as reported by Leonardos, Kendell, and Barnard (1969).
This does not necessarily imply that there  are  no odor problems
in the study area, because odorants with different thresholds
may exist in the sludge.  These odorants may react or counteract
among themselves and yield an odor potential  that can be extra-
polated theoretically from the  ammonia study.

d.   Dilution and dispersion of source concentrations - Turner's
diffusion model for an area source was employed to estimate the
atmospheric dilution capacity around the study area (Turner, 1970)
Assuming the source concentration to be at  unity at the geometri-
cal center of the holding basins, the  ground-level ammonia con-
centrations directly downwind from the source are determined for
                          VII-30

-------
                                              99.99









,

4 •)

' 1
! 1
i
i
I
1

i 1
!;
j
. !
i
liil
XDC
xy>o









J
I
t
1. !
i i




c
t
!
(
o

-i
—

itt.
DOC
D r^tc










I


1
1
1

V
J
3
O
J
^
5


I
>


\
k














o
•r™
+J
s-
4->
C

s=
0


II
o
s>



\
\
(



















c
^t
























>






k
s
















1
c
(V






V
N














1
1
>
)
r






\
^












i

j
o
CM








\



























^k
i



i
!





1 1

_ ] J
o cnoo
•— oo
1







:


xfc

1



)

4- -
1

' T
,
i
r^.vo LT
oo c












^











>
>












*.












)













^^










CS
c













•^.










J
3














^"•—








j

O

99.9 «
99.8 %°
Q.^
99 1^
I »
OO *^* eT.?
yts s« ^^LO
qc —
90 S | |
80 S j?^
fO r-
70 K S^
60 5 5^
50 VI gSJ —
40 ^Q^S
30 | ^S^
OJ q_ . .
9f) J- 0*-^ •
t-u i- rou
o & z: >—<
in 
0.01 !I


Ammonia Concentration (ppm)
                  VII-31

-------
     both  the worst and the most probable conditions  (see Section  IV.A).
     Their isopleths or contours of equal concentration are shown  sep-
     arately in  Figures VII-14 and VII-15.  The dilution capacity  of the
     atmosphere  is expressed as a ratio, because the  source concentra-
     tion  is normalized to unity.  A dilution ratio of 0.7 at a down-
     wind  receptor means  that the downwind concentration is seven-tenths
     of  the source concentration.

          During worst conditions, the  lowest dilution ratio and high-
     est ammonia concentration at the MSDGC property  boundaries are es-
     timated to  be 0.8 and 3.8 ppm, respectively, and are most likely to
     occur in the vicinity of Highway 5  (Cuba-Canton  Rd.).  Under  the
     most  probable conditions, this concentration will be reduced  to ap-
     proximately 0.25 ppm, with a dilution ratio of 0.5.  Based on this
     rationale and assuming  the odor-sensitive receptors to be uniformly
     distributed spatially,  the incidence of odor complaints should be
     highest near the northern perimeter of the MSDGC property.  This is
     roughly consistent with  locations  of odor complaints verified by
     MRI (see Figure VII-1,  page VII-3). Continued and improved efforts
     on  odor complaint verification by  controlled detection, identifi-
     cation and  quantification are believed necessary to confirm this
     finding.

3.   Potential  Impacts

     A comparison of sites where odor complaints originate with winds
blowing  from  the MSDGC  project site at  the time of complaints  indicates
that the probability of  complaints arising due to odors from MSDGC sour-
ces is 0.71 or  71%.   It  has  been shown  that ammonia concentrations at the
sludge holding  basins,  even  during the  most unfavorable meterological con-
ditions, are  less than  the  threshold value reported by Leonardos et al.
(1969).   Therefore, malodorants other than ammonia must reside  in  the
sludge.   These  malodorants  are as yet unidentified, but probably act
synergistically  to  generate  an earthy smell from the  sludge.
                              VII-32

-------
                                             99.99

j



j



i r
|
!l
4-1-1
' i i
| j
ill
j - t
i!


]
! i i
' ' i

'!<
uii
300
XT> ca










!
j .
i
T"1'
i
i 1
, u +
r i I

0)
(J
o
oo

o


uu
oo
r^to

\
{














0
-M
-l->
C
«,






i



I I .
1
1 f
ii
o crioor
r— OO<
!










o o












>









i
i
I
<
c












X











I-
3












v








!
i
i
<*•
C













^>










5
)













^










C\
C













^.










J
3














~-"~—








J

O

99.9
99.8

99
98 S
v_-
95 §
90 5
80 2
{Q
70 %
60 M
50 VI
40
30 |
0)
20 t
3
0
10 8
14-
5 °
^
2 S
1 ^
cu
0.5 i
0.2
0.1

0.01


                                                        o
                                                        '££
                                                        01.;:
f Atmos
975g; E
-13
gure
Ammonia Concentration (ppm)
                  VII-31

-------
     both the worst and the most probable conditions  (see Section  IV.A).
     Their  isopleths or contours of equal concentration are shown  sep-
     arately in  Figures VII-14 and VII-15.  The dilution capacity  of the
     atmosphere  is expressed as a ratio, because the  source concentra-
     tion is normalized to unity.  A dilution ratio of 0.7 at a down-
     wind receptor means that the downwind concentration is seven-tenths
     of  the source concentration.

         During worst conditions, the  lowest dilution ratio and high-
     est ammonia concentration at the MSDGC property  boundaries are es-
     timated to  be 0.8 and 3.8 ppm, respectively, and are most likely to
     occur  in the vicinity of Highway 5  (Cuba-Canton  Rd.).  Under  the
     most probable conditions, this concentration will be reduced  to ap-
     proximately 0.25 ppm, with a dilution ratio of 0.5.  Based on this
     rationale and assuming  the odor-sensitive receptors to be uniformly
     distributed spatially,  the incidence of odor complaints should be
     highest near the northern perimeter of the MSDGC property.  This is
     roughly consistent with  locations  of odor complaints verified by
     MRI (see Figure VII-1,  page VII-3). Continued and improved efforts
     on  odor complaint verification by  controlled detection, identifi-
     cation and  quantification are believed necessary to confirm this
     finding.

3.   Potential  Impacts

     A comparison of  sites where odor complaints originate with winds
blowing  from  the MSDGC  project site at  the time of complaints  indicates
that the probability  of  complaints arising due to odors from MSDGC sour-
ces is 0.71 or  71%.   It  has  been shown  that ammonia concentrations at the
sludge holding  basins,  even  during the  most unfavorable meterological con-
ditions, are  less than  the  threshold value reported by Leonardos et a!.
(1969).   Therefore, malodorants other than ammonia must reside  in  the
sludge.   These  malodorants  are as yet unidentified, but probably act
synergistically  to  generate  an earthy smell from the  sludge.
                              VII-32

-------
                                                             Key:
                                                             Dilution Factors
Figure VII-1^.  Downwind Atmospheric Dilution Ratio
                Under the Worst Conditions
                (Enviro Control, Inc., 1975).
                              VII-33

-------
                                                       Key:
                                                       Dilution Factors
Figure VII-15.   Downwind Atmospheric Dilution Ratio
                Under the Most Probable Conditions
                (Enviro Control,  Inc.,  197?)
                             VII-34

-------
     Atmospheric dilution in ithe project area is estimated to reduce
ammonia and other odorant concentrations 4 miles downwind by approxi-
mately two to four times under worst and most probable conditions,
respectively.  This odorant dilution is considered ineffective in
the abatement of odor problems.  If the emission strength of odorants
at the holding basins remains the same, odor complaints will probably
continue to be raised.

     The odor impact area apparently is contained by a circle with a
radius of approximately 4 to 5 miles.  This circle includes the com-
munities of St. David, Bryant, Cuba, and the outskirts of southwest
Canton.  Considering the prevailing winds and dispersion pattern of
airborne odorants, farm households along the northerly perimeter of
the MSDGC property will experience most of the odor impact.  Infre-
quent periods of severe impact could result from subsidence inversion
which produces atmospheric stagnation and high air temperatures.

4.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     Atmospheric dispersion is estimated to be inadequate for proper
odor dilution.  Providing an increased buffer distance between the
sludge holding basins and sensitive receptors is, therefore, an inef-
fective mitigative measure.  Mitigative measures should aim at reduc-
ing emission strength at the source.  Three alternatives for this type
of mitigation are discussed below.

     Improving sludge quality would reduce malodorant concentrations,
and would thereby reduce odor potential.  Sludge quality can be im-
proved by increasing the storage time of properly digested sludge in
the Chicago Lawndale lagoons.

     White-capping at the surface of the holding basins due to wind
promotes sludge aerosolization, which is one major mechanism for odor
generation.   The use of wind barriers such as tall, dense hedgerows
or fences around the holding basin berms, or floating baffles within
                              VII-35

-------
the basins, could reduce surface turbulence  and wave action which in-
tensify odor emissions.   The present requirement of a 4-foot free-
board from the sludge surface to the top of  the berm provides wind
baffling only for a short distance downwind.

     Odor emission from the sludge holding basins correlates with am-
bient air temperature, which helps to control  the evaporation rate of
sludge.  Chemical suppression of sludge evaporation, using a low-
volatility liquid film which increases surface tension,  might be ef-
fective in reducing odor potential during periods of high  air tempera-
ture.  The economic and technical  feasibility  of this option require
further investigation.

     Odor masking or counteracting agents have been used successfully
for industrial odor abatement.  The MSDGC has  spread Odoban 518-D,
manufactured by Rhodia, Inc., around the berms of the sludge holding
basins.  Monitoring the effectiveness of this  and other odor masking
agents is necessary.  If this proves to be an  effective odor control
method without adverse environmental side effects, it could be applied
during periods of unfavorable weather conditions when odor propaga-
tion is greatest.  Continuous monitoring for odor detection and peri-
odic identification of odorant species are important in judging the
effectiveness of control measures.

     The extreme remedy of constructing deeper holding basins having
less exposed surface area in order to reduce evaporation is probably
infeasible both economically and technically.   Problems in lining the
basins and mixing solids with supernatant could prove overwhelming.
Also,  an increased basin freeboard would prove infeasible; increased
wind sheltering would be slight in exchange  for a great reduction in
storage capacity.
                             VII-36

-------
D.   ODOR POTENTIAL OF ALTERNATIVE SLUDGE APPLICATION METHODS

     A number of methods are available for applying liquid sludge to soil.
Five alternative methods of sludge application are described in this sec-
tion along with their mechanisms and potential for producing odors.  The
five methods discussed are:

     t    Pressurized spraying
     •    Overland flow
     t    Infiltration-percolation by shallow impoundment
     •    Soil incorporation
     •    Soil injection.

Overland flow and infiltration-percolation by shallow impoundment can
be categorized as surface spreading methods.  Soil incorporation and soil
injection can be categorized as surface penetration methods.

     1.   Pressurized Pivotal Spraying

          In this method, sludge is sprayed onto the field through a pres-
     surized nozzle.  The nozzle opening is normally at least 2-inches in
     diameter to prevent clogging.  The nozzle pressure used in the project
     is 90 psi and the spray rate is 600 gpm.  This yields a horizontal  throw
     of approximately 120 to 150 feet when the nozzle is inclined at an  angle
     of 45°.

          Odor is generated in this method by sludge aerosolization and  sub-
     sequent volatilization of malodorants.  The volatilization of malodor-
     ants from soil surfaces moistened by sludge and localized ponding of
     sludge also increase odor generation.  Ammonia volatilization from  a
     sludge surface or field applied with sludge is discussed in Sections
     A and B of this chapter.  Only the aerosolization and subsequent vola-
     tilization are discussed here, but the same theoretical considerations
     can be applied to other application methods.
                                  VII-37

-------
a.   Formation and evaporation of aerosols - After being ejected
from the sprayer nozzle, liquid sludge breaks up into blobs or
droplets.  Large blobs fall rapidly to the ground with little
volatilization or evaporation during travel.  Small  sludge drop-
lets or aerosols have a slow terminal  settling velocity, result-
ing from the balance between gravity and drag resistance of the
air, and may remain airborne for a long time.  While residing in
the air, the aerosols volatilize at a  rate depending on aerosol
size and ambient conditions such as atmospheric stability, wind
speed, humidity, and temperature.

     The quantity and size of sludge aerosols generated by the
sprayer gun are governed by the operating pressure and the shape
of the nozzle opening.  As the energy  applied to a unit mass of
sludge increases, the proportion of aerosols increases while the
mean size decreases (Fuchs, 1964).   The aerosols are polydispersed
rather than uniform in size.  The  size spectrum of aerosols gener-
ated by this type of irrigation sprayer is unavailable in the lit-
erature.  It is therefore necessary to examine the evaporation
potential as a function of aerosol  size.

     A meaningful indication of the evaporation rate of a liquid
aerosol is the mass half-life.  The mass  half-life of a droplet
is the time required for the droplet to evaporate or volatilize
to one half of its original mass.   Figure VII-15 records the mass
half-lives of aerosols of different sizes containing a sodium
chloride concentration of 8,000 mg/1,  where the atmosphere is
still, the temperature is 10°C, and the humidity varies.   The
mass half-life ranges from .001 to approximately 100 seconds for
aerosol sizes between 1 and 500 microns and a relative humidity
ranging between 40 and 90 percent.   For a given aerosol size, the
mass half-life increases with increasing relative humidity.  High
relative humidity therefore hinders evaporation of water and mal-
odorants from sludge aerosols.  Using  the same thermal dynamic
equation, which establishes the relationship between aerosol evap-
oration rate and the ambient relative  humidity, temperature, and


                         VII-38

-------
salt or impurity content, one can demonstrate that aerosol evap-
oration rates increase with increasing temperatures and decreas-
ing salt or impurity concentrations (Squires, 1951; Fletcher, 1962;
Hanna, 1974).

     While airborne, small liquid aerosols may evaporate completely
and leave dried salt nuclei in the atmosphere; large aerosols may
not evaporate completely before striking the ground.  The degree
of evaporation of a liquid aerosol is thus governed by its atmos-
pheric residence time, or the time during which the aerosol re-
mains airborne.  The residence time of a liquid aerosol emitted
by a sprayer gun at a given height and angle of inclination, in
still air, is plotted in Figure VII-16.  This graph shows that
residence time decreases with increasing aerosol  size, lower emis-
sion height, and less inclination of the sprayer gun.   For the
construction of these residence time curves, it has been assumed
that the operating pressure at the nozzle is proportionately re-
duced so that the horizontal  velocity of the jet is the same for
various combinations of nozzle height and inclination.

     Figure VII-16 shows that the residence time of a  liquid aero-
sol can be reduced tenfold when the nozzle or emission height is
reduced from 40 ft. to 5 ft.  and the inclination reduced from 45°
to 0°.  Evaporation from aerosols larger than approximately 50
microns will therefore decrease significantly, because their resi-
dence times are small compared to their mass haIf-lives.  The
reduction in evaporation from aerosols in the micron and sub-micron
spectra by lowering emission height and the angle of inclination is
of little significance.   However, as the operating pressure is re-
duced with a lower emission height and inclination, the energy
applied to a unit mass of sludge is reduced so that the production
of aerosols, especially of fine aerosols, is reduced.

b.   Emission strength of aerosols^ - An estimation of  the ammonia
emission strength from spraying is necessary to compare its odor
potential  with that from the sludge holding basins. This comparison
                         VII-39

-------
TOO
 10 -
  1  -
   -2
 10
   -4
                                                80%
                                                70%
                                                60%
                                                50%
                                                40%
100
  Emission Height,
]0 Inclination of Sprayer)
                                                     !(40 feet, 45°)
                                                     1 (30 feet, 45°)
                                                     (10 feet,0°)

                                                     (5 feet, 0°)
                                                     10
                                                       -1
                                                     10
  -2
                                                     10
                                                       -3
                    10             100           1000

               Diameter of Droplet  (microns)
  Figure VII-16.  Mass Half-Life and Residence Time of Aerosols
                 (Containing  8,000  mg/1 of NaCl and moving at
                 terminal  velocity  with an ambient temperature
                 of 10°C);  (Squires, 1951; Fletcher,  1962; Hanna,
                 1974;  Enviro Control,  Inc.,  1976)

                              VI1-40

-------
is based on the following assumptions:

     •    0.3% of the liquid sludge -is  transformed  into aerosols
          with a mass mean diameter of  either 50 or 120 microns,
          mean mass half-life of 9 seconds, and equal mean resi-
          dence times
     •    Relative humidity is 75%
     •    Salt and impurity content of  sludge is equivalent
          to 8,000 mg/1 of sodium chloride.
     •    Emission height is 10 ft.
     •    Ammonia concentration is 1,500 mg/1 in the liquid
          sludge.

     The emission strength of the spray, in terms of atmospheric
ammonia, is approximately 1.1 x 10~^ cubic meters of ammonia per
second for each sprayer with a mean diameter of 120 microns.  If
the mean diameter of the sludge aerosols is 50 microns, the ammonia
emission rate is approximately doubled  to 2.3 x 10"4 nrVsec
Each sprayer covers an area ranging from 120 to 150 feet in radius
(or approximately 1 acre); these two aerosol sizes result in rates
of 1.1 x 10   m /sec and 2.3 x 10   nr/sec of ammonia per acre,
respectively.  The emission strength will be increased if a higher
proportion of sludge is aerosolized, and vice versa.

     Most of the sludge from the sprayer will reach the ground.
Part of the sludge reaching the soil will be volatilized.   Accord-
ing to MSDGC's study of ammonia volatilization from sludge-treated
spoils, about 43% of the ammonia added  to the spoil is volatilized
within the first week (MSDGC, 1974m).  With a sludge spraying rate
of 40 dry tons per acre per day, which  is extraordinarily high,
the average emission rate of ammonia at 25°C is  roughly 7.6 x 10"^
m3/sec/acre in the first week.  If the  sludge is applied in six
runs with a week of separation between each run, the emission rate
is estimated conservatively to be 1.3 x 10~^ m^/sec/acre.   Assum-
ing a 600 gpm nozzle flow, the allotted amount of sludge can be
applied to an acre in 3 hours.  If the application rate is reduced,
the ammonia emission rate or odor potential is correspondingly re-
duced.
                      VII-41

-------
          The foregoing estimation reveals  that the odor emission
     strength from sludge aerosols is in the same order of magnitude
     as that from the evaporation of sludge from treated spoils.   How-
     ever, the total  aerosol  volume is only a fraction of 1% of the
     sludge volume applied to the field.  Obviously,  the odor emission
     potential of aerosols generated by the sprayer is approximately
     50 to 100 times  that of  the sludge in  the spoils.

          The great increase  in odor emission by sludge aerosolization
     is attributable  to the great expansion of exposed surface area.
     The surface area of exposure is the area of air-liquid interface
     on which volatilization  or evaporation occurs.   Assuming that it
     takes three sprayer runs to apply 40 dry tons of sludge per  acre,
     the total exposed surface area without aerosolization will  be
     12,000 square meters. If 0.3% of the  sprayed sludge is aerosolized
     to a mass mean diameter  of 120 microns,  the surface area will be
     approximately 140,000 square meters, which is equivalent to  a twelve-
     fold increase.  If the mean aerosol  size is 50 microns instead  of
     120 microns,  the total exposed surface area will  be  increased to
     340,000 square meters.

2.   Surface Spreading

     Surface spreading of sludge includes overland flow and infiltra-
tion-percolation.   With overland flow, sludge is applied to the land
in a sheet flow or in ploughed furrows from  distributors  which
may be ditches or  gated pipes  with side  outlets (see  Figure  VII-17).
Liquid sludge percolates through soil  and at the same time evaporates
into the atmosphere.   Sludge  collected at downhill runoff collection
ditches can be pumped back to the ridge distributors  or released  to re-
tention basins.  The  exposed  surface area of sludge is limited to the
land surface, because sludge  aerosolization does not occur.  Therefore,
the potential for odor emission in this method is far less than that
for spraying.  The  exposed surface area of sludge is least if a  ridge-
and-furrow surface is employed.
                           VII-42

-------
                             EVAPORATION
  SPRAY APPLICATION
            ••*•*." "•
  SLOPE 2-4»-^ife
                 BRASS AND  VEBETATIVE LITTER

                             SHEET FLOW
 "rii&TiS^*®.
 	100-300 FT
                                                             /—RUNOFF
                                                                COLLECTION
     Figure VII-17.
Overland Flow Application  of Sludge (U.S.
EPA, 1975; Enviro Control, Inc.,  1976)
      Infiltration-percolation of sludge is shown below  in  Figure VII-18.
.Sludge is  diverted to shallow ditches or impoundments which  encourage
 infiltration and percolation through the soil.  Evaporation  and  odor
 potential  are less than with overland flow application  because of re-
 duced exposed surface area.  Infiltration-percolation can  result in a
 recharge mound if the horizontal movement of groundwater is  exceeded
 by vertical  percolation.  Of all sludge application methods,  the poten-
 tial  for groundwater contamination is highest in this process.   Because
 the sludge is confined to a system of ditches, ponds or terrace  impound-
 ments, only limited types of crops can be grown.
                                  EVAPORATION    „„„ „
                                               SURFACE APPLICATION
    Figure VII-18.
Infiltration-Percolation of Sludge  (U.S.
EPA, 1975; Enviro Control, Inc.,  1976)
                                                              ORIGINAL WATER
                                                                   TABLE
                                VII-43

-------
3.    Surface Penetration

     Surface penetration methods include soil  incorporation and soil
injection (see Chapter III).   Soil  incorporation is  accomplished by
tilling machines and incorporates sludge to almost the entire soil
cross-section.  In the soil  injection method,  sludge is injected into
slots formed in the soil by a tool  shank.   (These two methods are illus-
trated in Figures III- 6 and  III-8,  pages  111-10 and  111-13,  respectively.)

     Neither of these methods generate sludge  aerosols.  Odor emission
is a result of the evaporation or volatilization of malodorants from
the sludge-incorporated soils.  The exposed surface area is much less
with surface penetration than with surface spreading, because the soil
behaves as an odor blanket when sludge is incorporated into it.  Be-
tween the soil incorporation and soil injection methods, the latter has
less odor potential because injection of sludge further reduces the ex-
posed surface area.  The only drawback in both of these methods is  their
limited use during crop growing seasons.

4.   Potential Impacts

     Odor dispersion from sludge application is similar to that from
the holding basins, and the atmospheric dilution capacity is essentially
the same.  The shapes of equal dilution contours are different and  de-
pend upon the shapes of the individual application fields.  In the  case
of spray application, the sprayer gun will be  the center of odor emission,
but fine aerosols generated by the sprayer may travel great distances
downwind and concurrently evaporate.  This will cause a shift of odor
in a downwind direction, depending on wind speed.

     Based on the foregoing considerations, sensitive receptors located
near the application fields will be impacted the most by spraying tech-
niques.  Affected fields include #27, #28, and #31 through #38.  The
spraying method is planned to be curtailed in  1976, and would account for
only 15% of total sludge application, which will definitely decrease  odor
problems.
                            VII-44

-------
     The strength of odor emissions from evaporation of sludge applied
to the soil surface and from surface ponding is equal to that from the
sludge holding basins.  The consequent odor problems are short-term,
however, because most odorants in the sludge will be released into the
atmosphere within the first week after sludge application.  Neverthe-
less, these short-term impacts may be prolonged and intensified during
unfavorable meteorological conditions.  The planned 1976 change-over
to sludge application by soil penetration methods for 85% of total ap-
plications should substantially ameliorate odor problems due to applica-
tion; problems related to storage in holding basins would remain.

5.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     Mitigative measures associated with sludge application can either
reduce source strength or discourage odor transmission from aerosol
drift.  Reducing spray pressure, emission height, and inclination of
the sprayer gun reduces sludge aerosolization, thus reducing odor emis-
sion strength.  Sludge spraying should, however, be prohibited on windy
days and during atmospheric stagnation.  The use of surface application
methods will eliminate sludge aerosols and their associated odor prob-
lems at the application fields.

     Odors originating from sludge in the soil can be controlled by a
reduction in the surface area of sludge exposed to the atmosphere.  Soil
incorporation or,better yet, soil injection is considered to be the
sludge application metnod most effective in reducing odor potential.

     Sludge ponding in the fields should be disallowed or certainly kept
at a minimum.  Ponding can be reduced by increasing the number of appli-
cation runs and allowing one week to elapse between successive runs.
Occasional unavoidable ponding should instigate control of odor genera-
tion.  The MSDGC has applied 74Q7, an odor control product of Pollution
Sciences, Inc., to ponding areas, and this practice should be continued.
                           VII-45

-------
E.   POTENTIAL SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION

     Chemical  and biological water quality  data  collected  from  various
monitoring stations on streams,  reservoirs,  and  runoff  basins are  analyzed
and summarized in this section.   The  conformance of water  quality  with  ap-
plicable standards is examined.   The  potential adverse  impacts  resulting
from project operations are delineated  and  appropriate  mitigative  measures
are recommended.

     1.   Water Quality of Streams

          There are 11 water monitoring stations throughout  the project area:
     SI, S2, S3,  S19, S20, S21,  S27,  S29, S31, S32, and S33; their locations
     are shown in Figure VI1-19.   A total of 24  water quality parameters  are
     analyzed for each station  (MSDGC,  1972a through 1975g).

          It*is important to distinguish stations measuring  background  water
     quality conditions from those affected  by project  operations.   The pro-
     ject actually began in July 1972 when  sludge was applied to Fields #3,
     and #9.

          Sludge was applied to  Fields  # 9  through #38, with the exception of
     Fields #34,  #35, and #36, from July 1972 to July 1975.  These  fields  are
    . primarily located south of  Highway 5,  as shown by  the shaded  area  in
     Figure VII-19.  Sampling stations  S19,  S20, S21, S29, S31, S32,  and  S33,
     which were unaffected by the project as of  July 1975, will represent
     background stream water quality  stations.   Station SI, which  is  upstream
     from the project site, is also a background station.  Station S3 is  lo-
     cated on Slug Run, a tributary which is isolated from the  application
     fields, and is therefore considered to  be a background  station as  well.

          a.   Chemical concentrations  - After comparing the water quality
          data gathered from these 11 stations with the water quality stand-
          ards for Illinois (see Chapter II), the chemical water quality  is
          summarized in terms of number of  observations and  violations  of
          standards in Table VII-7.
                                VII-46

-------
                                  Key:
                                  W = Well
                                  S = Stream
                                  R = Reservoir
Figure VII-19.   General Area Applied with Sludge and
                Water Monitoring Stations (MSDGC, 1972a
                through 1975g).
                             VII-47

-------
 ID O>
•u,
 U) t~. +J
*> o
 o    «>
        CM   r-    t-                   S.








        '—'—»—*              inmr^'*'"






  	     «^_   ^    -^   ^    r^    i~i
 O









        O~f3c-^o"~~o"o"c3o'~




        ••-   f—    r—   p—^^-*—    p^p—   r—    CTl


        CM   Ul    •—   O              C3OC3O





n            •—    i—   i—              —    —


 o*    incoino    "     "ujcs^oT
 «/>          r—    r—                              CM
















        OOOO              OOOO
                                 	    oiO»—    r-   en    ^-   CMCO
                            CMCOr—   CMCMCMfMPOCOCO
                            (/>bOi/>mv)ico
                                       VII-48

-------
     The pH values and concentrations of Cl, Cr, Ni, and Se are
within standards at all stations.  Stations S20, S21, and S33 in-
dicate numerous violations of standards for SO., NH3-N, Fe, Mn,
and total dissolved solids (IDS).  These stations might be in-
fluenced by the surface runoff from a cattle feedlot, effluents
from septic tanks in the community of Cuba, seepage from an oxi-
dation pond, and landfill leachate within  the project  property  (see
 Figure VII-19,  page VII-47).   In addition, Station S33 reports  high
 concentrations  of Cd and  Zn,  and Station S31 shows violations of SO,,
Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn and TDS standards.  These violations may result
from runoff on strip-mined land, but this cannot be confirmed in
the absence of a field investigation.  Station 27, which is .located
downstream from application fields 28, 30, 31, 32, and 33, has
recorded a number of violations of SO^, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, and TDS
standards.

     The number of violations reported at Station SI  correlate with
those at Station S2.  Water quality at Stations SI and S2 may be
influenced by the effluent from the Canton Sewage Treatment Plant.
Numerous violations of SO^, NH3, Cu, Fe, Pb, and TDS standards
have been  reported  at these two stations.   Downstream Station S2
demonstrates better overall water quality than Station SI; in-
stream purification must occur along Big Creek between these two
stations.  However, cleansing in this stream segment is insuffi-
cient to reduce pollutants at Station S2 to acceptable levels.
Runoff basins provided for the sludge application fields are not
effective in removing dissolved solids.  The dissolved solids,
containing metals, seem to be discharged into this segment of the
creek.

b.   Fecal coliform concentrations - The only biological  water
quality parameter measured at these monitoring stations is fecal
coliform concentration.  Fecal coliforms, while non-pathogenic,
indicate that pathogenic organisms of fecal origin may be present
in the water.  The number of observations,  geometric  mean, maxi-
mum, and minimum fecal  coliform concentrations  at all  stream sta-
tions are given in Table VII-8.  Geometric  means at stations SI,

                        VII-49

-------
       Table VI1-8.    Fecal  Coliform Concentrations  in Streams,
                      July  1972  to July  1975  (MSDGC,  1972a  through
                      1975g)
Stream
Sampling
Station
SI
S2
S3
S19
S20
S21
S27
S29
S31
S32
S33
Fecal Coliform Concentration
Number of
Observations
25
26
25
26
4
4
24
25
26
26
9
Geometric
Mean*
10,177
3,353
194
566
1,032
14
1,267
628
155
87
346
Maximum
87,000
47,000
1,200
66,000
42,000
100
28,000
5,000
10,370
1,300
6,900
per 100 ml
Minimum
100
100
10
40
30
0
40
0
0
0
60
*Illinois standard = 200  max.
                                VII-50

-------
     S2, SI9, S20, S27, S29, and S33 exceed the Illinois standard of
     200 per 100 ml.  This is probably due to contamination by human
     or animal waste in effluents from the sewage treatment plant and
     septic tanks, and in runoff from cattle feedlots.

          Fecal coliform concentrations generally decrease between
     Stations SI and S2.  This is demonstrated by the chronological
     plotting of fecal coliforms for both stations as shown in Figure
     VII-20.  Assuming the flow velocity in Big Creek to vary from 0.3
     to l.Ofps, the pollution time in residence between the two sta-
     tions ranges from 9.5 to 32 hours.

          Using the geometric means in Table VII-8 (page VII-50) and as-
     siiming a logarithmic  linear die-off function, this residence time
     corresponds  to a coliform half-life of 6 to 20 hours.  This rate in-
     cludes the dilution effect of runoff along this 6.5-mile segment
     of Big Creek.  The actual die-off rate must, therefore, be lower.
     Both stations experienced a higher level  of fecal coliforms in  the
     summer, presumably because warm weather favors the survival of
     bacteria.  In October 1973 and February 1975, fecal coliform
     counts at Station S2 were higher than at Station SI.  Therefore,
     other sources of fecal pollution may exist between these two sta-
     tions.

2.   Water Quality of Reservoirs

     Ten stations are established to monitor the water quality of reser-
voirs;  they are designated Rl, R2, R3, R4, R5, RIO, R12, R27 (or RN27),
and R34, and their locations are shown in Figure VII-19 (page VII-47). A
total of 27 water quality parameters .are measured; the data are pre-
sented in Table VII-9.

     a.   Chemical and fecal coliform concentrations - Strip-mine lakes
     in central Missouri were studied by Campbell and Lind (1969) for
     long-term aging or successional change by stages.  For the pur-
     poses of their discussion, lakes were identified by letter:
                             VII-51

-------
loo.ooo n'~
   TOO
          1973
                         1874
                                             1975
        Figure VII-20.
Variation of  Fecal  Coliform
Concentrations  with Time for
Stations SI and S2  (MSDGC, 1972a
through 1975g).
        VII-52

-------
             Table VII-9.   Water Quality of Reservoirs  (MSDGC, 1972a through 1975g;
                            Campell and Lind, 1969;  General Water Quality Standards
                            for Illinois' Waters)

Water Quality
Parameter and Unit
PH
Total P (mg/1)
Cl (mg/1)
SO, (mg/1)
N-Kjeldahl (mg/1)
NH3-N (mg/1)
N03+N03-N (mg/1)
Alkalinity
(as CaOh) (mg/1)
Conductivity (mho)
Ca (mg/1)
K (mg/1)
Na (mg/1)
Al (mg/1)
Cd (mg/1)
Cr (mg/1)
Cu (mg/1)
Fe mg/1
Pb mg/1
Mg mg/1
Mn mg/1)
Hg (mg/1)
N1 mg/1)
Zn (mg/1)
T.S.S. (mg/1)
T.D.S. (mg/1)
Fecal Conforms
(1/100 ml)

July-Dec.
1972
6.9-10.0
0-1.20
1-30
4-1 ,508
0-4.4
0.1-1.5
0-1.10

70-580
120-2,500
9-360
0-13
1-535
—
0-0.1
o-o. n
0-0.16
0-3.6
0-0.31
10-483
0-1.19
0-0.9
0-0.38
0-0.6
—
—

0->7,000
Reservoir
Jan. -Sec.
197?
7.3-8.9
0.02-0.73
5-20
16-781
0-2.4
0-1.07
0-8.30

80-500
300-3,340
45-367
1-8
9-229
0-3.77
0-0.02
0-0.02
0-0.13
0-1.9
0-0.33
34-132
0-1.22
0-0.8
0
0
—
—

0-7,600
Samples
Jan. -Dec.
1974
7.3-9.0
0-2.80
2-312
13-1,160
0-4.5
0-2.0
0-6.30

56-530
570-2,300
45-550
2-10
9-265
0-4.0
0-0.03
0-0.03
0-0.08
0-9.2
0-0.27
35-162
0-1.55
0-3.0
0-0.1
0-0.4
0-231
422-2,092

0-1,500

Jan. -July
1975
6.9-9.0
0.01-0.47
4-130
40-1 ,030
0-2.3
0-1.0
0.01-8.48

30-900
300-2,000
20-418
1-10
9-219
0-4.0
0-0.02
0-0.04
0-0.43
.0-2.4
0-0.13
20-137
0-0.98
0-0.88
0-0.3
0-0.2
1-187
189-6,940

0-660
Strip Mine
Lakes of
Type B
6.1-8.2
—
—
134-245
—
._
—

49-92
—
39.5-63.0
5.7-7.5
6.0-7.3
0.001-0.058
/
- \
__
0.0-0.024
—
17.1-25.6
0.08-2.1
..
~
0.05-0.07
«
~

—
Illinois Surface
Water Quality
Standards
6.5-9.0
^0.05
4 500
^500
^
^1.5
^

—
—
—
__
—
—
^0.05
ft I i f\ / f\ f\f
-Cr(+6)4,0.05
.Cr(+3)41.0
^0.02
>1.0
^O.l
—
<1.0
$0.5
^1.0
41.0

,£1,000

/zoo
1 ~ . . \
D.O. (mg/1)
(geometric mean)
    >5
   (anytime)
                                           VII-53

-------
Al, A2, and A3 are acid; B and D are neutral or slightly alkaline.
Lake A represents the most acidic stage,  resulting from continued
oxidation of sulfur-bearing waste coal  in the watershed, and Lake
D represents the alkaline stage.

     The most obvious changes associated  with the aging of strip-
mine lakes pertain to acid-base relationships.   Decline in poten-
tial free acidity as  lakes age is related to the appearance of bi-
carbonate alkalinity.  In addition,  decreasing specific conduc-
tance and declining concentrations of sulfate,  calcium, magnesium,
potassium, and sodium with increasing pH  indicate aging of strip-
mine lakes.  The reservoirs within the  MSDGC project property have
water most similar in quality to Lake B,  which represents a rela-
tively well-aged strip-mine lake.  To assess the effects of aban-
doned strip mines on  lake or reservoir  water quality, the data col-
lected at the project site are compared to those for Type B strip-
miTie lakes.

     In general, the  pH values, alkalinity, and concentrations of
metals in these reservoirs are somewhat higher than average for
those of strip-mine lakes, though still within their range.  Re-
servoirs within the project property are  relatively richer in
mineral contents.  The comparison shows that project-area lakes
are sufficiently aged to support substantial aquatic life, and
they are more vulnerable to high nutrient inputs and eutrophica-
tion than the less-aged, acidic strip-mine lakes.

     The pH values and ammonia nitrogen levels in these reservoirs
generally conform to  Illinois water quality standards.  Concentra-
tions of chlorides and metals such as Cd, Cr, Ni, and Zn are nor-
mally within state standards.  These reservoirs do, however, exhibit
high levels of inorganic nitrogen, total  phosphorus, sulfate, Cu,
Fe, Pb, Mn, and Hg, which violate Illinois standards.  High salt
content often increases the level of total dissolved solids above
the standard.  High dissolved solids may be attributed to surface
runoff from strip-mined areas and sludge application fields, or


                         VII-54

-------
release of dissolved bottom sediments in the reservoirs.  Reser-
voir sediments may contain large amounts of strip-mine spoil result-
ing from rain downwash.  Samples of reservoir bottom sediments are
unavailable.  This hypothesis could be tested with further investi-
gation and monitoring.

     Fecal coliform concentrations in all reservoirs are generally
low, indicating that the treated and aged  sludge applied to the
project site has a low fecal coliform level and/or the runoff basins
in the application fields are effective in removing fecal bacteria.
Nevertheless, high levels of fecal coliforms are found sporadically.

b.   Dissolved oxyjen concentrations - Dissolved oxygen (D.O.) con-
centrations determine the capacity of a water body to support aqua-
tic life.  The State of Illinois specifies that a minimum of 6 mg/1
of D.O. must be maintained for 16 hours of a 24-hour period, and a
minimum of 5 mg/1 of D.O. must be maintained at all times.  The
D.O. status of reservoirs Rl, R2 and R3 are discussed below.  Data
are unavailable for the other reservoirs.

     D.O. levels, average water temperatures, and average theoreti-
cal saturation values of D.O. in the three reservoirs are presented
in Figure VII-21.  As the data indicate, D.O. levels are generally
higher than the minimum standard of 5 mg/1.  The D.O. levels of all
three reservoirs form a typical seasonal pattern, with D.O.  peaking
in winter and at a minimum in summer.  This cyclic pattern is, as
expected, opposite to the seasonal variation of reservoir tempera-
ture.  D.O. levels are close to the average theoretical saturation
values, and are therefore predominantly influenced by water tempera-
ture and the reservoir mixing characteristics.   The reservoirs prob-
ably have not received large inputs of oxygen-demanding pollutants
such as carbonaceous and nitrogeneous organic materials.

     During May 1973 and July 1975, D.O. levels dropped below 6 mg/1
in Reservoir Rl, which receives  runoff basin effluents from sludge
application Fields #26, #27, #28, and #30.   Sludge was not applied
to these fields until August 1974.  Runoff retention basin B-30-2

                         VII-55

-------
  30
  20 -
OJ

Q.



QJ
£ 1C-
aj
cr>
  20
  15 -
X
o


15 10
>,
re
Q
   0
                      Key:


                      Reservoirs
                                  	R2

                                  	R3
                                        ' Average Saturated Level-of Dissolved Oxygen
                                                                               v-^—*
    J J A S 0  N D 0 F M A M J J A SO N DJ  FMAMJJAS  0 N D 0  F M A" H J  J A S -Q fj D


        •1972	>U	  1973	»+«	1974  	>+*	 1975	
           Figure  VII-21.  Reservoir Water  Temperature and Level  of

                            Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.)  (MSDGC, 1972a  through

                            1975g;  and Enviro Control,  Inc. 1976).
                                       VII-56

-------
     discharged into Reservoir Rl after the reservoir water was sam-
     pled on July 9, 1975.  Therefore, no connection between observed
     low D.O. concentrations in Reservoir Rl and the project opera-
     tion can be established.

          During the summer, when ambient temperatures are high and D.O.
     saturation levels are low, nighttime D.O. levels may be much lower
     than daytime levels.  This is attributable to the continued deple-
     tion of D.O. by planktonic respiration while photosynthetic oxy-
     gen regeneration is absent.  Nighttime monitoring of D.O. is there-
     fore essential to complete the assessment of possible environmental
     impacts resulting from project operations.

3.   Water  Quality  and  Capacity of  Runoff  Basins

     More than 50 runoff retention basins have been constructed within
the project property as of July 1975.  With the exception of Field #38,
on which sludge was applied in October 1974, all fields receiving or
scheduled to receive sludge are provided with at least one basin.  Each
 runoff  basin  is  coded with  the same  number  as  the field  it serves,
with a sub-number when more than one basin is provided for a particular
field.   For example, basin B-20-3 represents Basin #3 of Field #20.

     a.    Effluent quality - The operating permit issued by the Illinois
     EPA specifies effluent standards for total suspended solids (TSS),
     biological oxygen demand  (BOD), and fecal coliforms (as discussed
     in Chapter IV):

          •    Arithmetic mean of TSS shall not exceed 66.7 mg/1
          •    Arithmetic mean of BOD shall not exceed 6.75 mg/1
          t    Geometric mean of fecal coliforms shall not exceed
               494.3 per 100 ml.

     Effluent quality of a runoff basin is  analyzed whenever there is a
     discharge.  The discharge of effluents from the runoff basin is
     necessary to reduce the water level  even in the absence of sludge
                              VII-57

-------
application.  The arithmetic or geometric mean, maximum, and minimum
levels of TSS, BOD, and fecal coliforms in each runoff basin are
presented in Table VII-10.

     Discharge from runoff basins  occurs intermittently and rarely
more than once a month.   Therefore,  the effects of a discharge upon
the receiving reservoir or creek probably diminish to insignificant
levels when the subsequent discharge is made.   The process of aver-
aging effluent quality as required by the state standards may be
inappropriate; very inferior effluents were discharged to receiving
waterways or water bodies, while their averaged water quality was
within the standards.   As shown  in Table VII-10, these substandard
effluents contained TSS as high  as 644 mg/1, BOD as high as 73 mg/1,
and fecal coliform counts as high  as 5,000 per 100 ml.  Such peak
concentrations could cause fish  kills or other irreversible biotic
impacts, primarily due to depletion of dissolved oxygen.

b.   Storm runoff capacities - Runoff basins were constructed to
provide a retention capacity for runoff from a 100-year storm.
The purpose of the basins is to  retain runoff from application
fields for the length of time required to meet standards before
the runoff water is discharged.   Substandard basin water may be
recycled by pumping to the application field.

     The effectiveness of runoff basins in containing 100-year
storm runoff can be examined by  comparing the design capacity of
the basins with the anticipated  volume of storm runoff.  Table VII-
11 summarizes the design capacity of each retention basin and storm
runoff volumes for 25-year and 100-year storms.  The 24-hour run-
off volumes for 25-year and 100-year storms are calculated on the
assumption of no percolation and no evapotranspiration of rain
water.  These assumptions result in slightly overestimating storm
runoff, which causes the evaluation of retention basin effective-
ness to be conservative.
                         VII-58

-------
Ig

IE
&l
S- UJ
4*.
o-o






If














c
V)
S

c
o
4-*
1
Ol
ac
n-

§
3
Of















CNI
^
G
._
r
a
i
vo
1
m
i
in
i
CM
1
•fl

CO


rl-
1

1
CO


1
1
CO

CO
Csj
1
CO
CM
1
CM
1
CO

_
1
CM
1
t
1
CO

£•£
01 IB
21
u- a
l«- 4->
UJ 




Parameter



to


CM
CO


S


f«





^O





in
CM



cn





CO





in



o


CNJ
^


CM


O





^





"^



CM





*-



O

O


CO
CM

in
si
CO

in
§


o




r*.
t*:





S


CO
CO
CO


in

in
CO



cn
CM
CM
CM


CM
in


CO
S


i


i





o
CM
CM



CO
in
CO


CM
CO




CO
•e



2

to
CO


oo


CM
cn
CO
\

in


i
i




,_





•-



i^





0





en


e
qj u^i
§ wo x i

U *4- O tO*
< 0 CtO
IA
C
o
4->
of Observa
*

IA
|
o
o
i



1
•c



1
X
£



1
I
C
SPHOS
papusdsns

*


1
1
CM


CO


,_





CM





cn



CO





CO





in



CM


1
O


O


p_





10





en



f—





CO





CO



^


1
1
in
CM

CM
^


f_
CM



cn
o



cn

CM


in
^





cn

CO

h*.
CM
cn



^


I
1
CO


rX


1
1




CO
CM




VO



CO





o*.
CM



to

CO



in


i
i
CM





1
1




^





CM



CM





CM



CM

^.


1^
IgSJ

5-slj

§
j;
E
I
o
I

I/)
1
o
f-
o
i



1
i



1
X



1
c
z
PUBUBQ
UOD/CXQ

f


r~ •
CM


CO


,_





CM





a



cn





CO





in


i
i
u

0


0
,_





o





o





CM



o





o



o

o



in
CM


i
CO


CO


o
CO




CM





s



CM
CM




to



2

CO
CM


O
CO


1
g
CO

g
CO


1
1




o
CO




°
CM


O
CO
*~



O
CM



O

o
IO

IA *J L

o
V

1
CM


CM


1





O

V



CM



CM





O
V


o

o

V

r-^gg i
+J O O "O r—

S**-'o£ xcnc
O O W *A Q) ^" r^
tn
I

(D
O
M-
O
*

IA
c
o
IO
"o
If-
o
i
^
E
8
c
8
CD

•^•
E
g
X
£

' — '
1
I
c
X
suuomoo


















(A


§
Si

S
**-
O
C
3
OE:










1
CO
1

CM
1

f—
*—

CO
CM
t
O


CO
3
CO

"»*»-
1
cn
i
CO


CM
1
cn



en
i
CD

1
CO
CD
1
CO
CO
CO
1
OS

•="g
QJ IQ
21
•*- -


in
in
10

CO
IO


*


CM
CM



CO



1



,_



1
1







CM
CM


CM
^.


*

L

«•»


CM



•*•



i



in



|








«-


CM
CM


CM


O « "O
lea xl1

< o c XQ
LBDi6oioig

•»


in



00



_



CO



r_








cn


IO



-


o


o



o



0



o



0








•»•


o
_


o


CM


«



m
CM



o



^



o
V



CO



JO


•-
CM


10
CM


o
cn


o



o
in



i



o



1



g



o


o
CO
o
CM
uv

s


o
V

o
\l


o



1



o
V


i



CM



CM


CM
O
^

CM

c
(D
E
U IA *> L
•*- •— E o o>
t- 10 C c a.
*J 0 O -O r-
01 0> If- i— O) CO E
f «- — _ 01 . ™
O f— IO U <• O
at M- o JT x cn o

tn
o
(O
IA
o
o
o

(A
1
o
o
i
-~
8
~-
i
8

i
g
^
i
X

1
g
^?
I
•E
suuoiuoo
                                    VII-59

-------














c
CO
c
o
4J
s
ce
**-
»*-
OL
















r™
^
CM
CC
cn
c
CM
C
CM


a

o
CM
CQ
r™

cn
CO
CM
i
r*.
i
CO
i
r*.

CO




CO


in

CO

«*•
i
CO
CM
1
CO
t "
CO

•M "O
C i.
51
5:5
UJ C/l




S
1

CM

-
ro
to



CO
cn
r-..

CO

CO
to

-
o
.-
o
*

0
2
u
u
£
o
o
i

t/1
0
to
'o
tt-
o
i
sp
I



^
]
(1




I
1
X



1
i
c
U0$
E^Oi *

CM




to



O






CO

to





CO



to



o


CM



o








IT)



CM


CM

r_





"^



CO



1
1

3



CM



CO
CO


CO
to

in

^

^
to
in
CO



CO

0

CM

CO



1
1

^



CO




ro



O



CM


•*

is.





S



(s.



1
1

tn



»— «




f\



CO



CO


CO

c\





CO



(T



1
1

ro


C
IL
4-> (/» 01 *x*
•*-> co in
t- <4- O •
< o z to

o

jserva
o
M-
0
1

in
c
o
o
»*-
o
I



—
1
I



1
i
X



i
i
c
pueuiag
Lia6AXu
[EDt6o|.otg

u?




(O



^~



«




cn





CO



>c



o


CM



'-








o



o


o

o





o



p_



1
1

o



rr


CM

CM



in



ro


in

i^.
p—




CM
CM



cn



i
i

ro
CO


§
CM
!-
s


CM

§



O


o
in

o
cn




o
to
*""


o

in


i

o
O)


CM

CM

CM



O
V


o
V

o
V

o

V



o
V


o

V

i
1

CT

V
•^
i §
U «A ** k.
4-* U O XI
A) Q} t»_ r— Q) CO
C *^ *^ ^~ 4t •
tt>M-'o5 xcn


^
s
01
o
o
I
1

c
"Z
•5
o
i
,-s,
6
8

— •
i
o

*"•
E
§
^
|
x

' — *
E
8
>
i
•£
MUO^lOO




















l/J
 a
•w 1- r~
&. •»- o *o
t/
c
4

£




|
"c
T-
SPH°S
papuadsn$
m



in



^



^




to





in





^




CO




O








^T



CM



CO



o



o




CO





CM





O




0




1
I







f*.



to


to
CO


in
in



in



cc
tc



to

to





*3-



^
U




1
1


CM



m
a



0*



•*



f^



in




CM





^





1
1



to




1








to
*™






•»



^.



in




•*





^r





i
i



in




t
i







ro



c
i-

0) O CJt
•M co m
"u »*- o •
< o c to

1

a
c

*

tA
|
K
"c
a

i



^
}
c
i

^«
•v»
g
-*-
*>
£

~
1
1
c

pueu&Q
in



in



*t



^f




VD





in





*-




ro




o








to



o



o



o



^




0





0





o




o




1
1



0


0



o

V

CM



o

V

,_




CM





CM





0

V


0

v


1




5


to



i
i


O
CO



1
1

8
-to

CM


8





O
CM




1
1



1
1



I




8
*

0
CM
r*





O
y


i
i


o

V


o





o





,
1



1
1



1
1



o
w

CM




c
E
U »rt ** l»
f-p- e o a»
L. « C c CL
+j o O^*O ^
H *^ *^ *"" ^ Jit Q
5lSSlS52
M
|
•ti
at
V
u-
o

i

c
c
1C

o


—
Ti
8
^
i



1
S
i

X
3.
suuo-m

1
S
^
1
c
£
03
VII-60

-------
a>
3






e
c
c
+.
a
4J
ee.

J^
0
a


















r*.
O
^
1
1C
1
oc
1

1
CO
?
CO
1





ro
IT
oo
1
CSJ


00
7


CO
fsi

o

1
CO

n
n
it- -*2
UJ V)



Parameter





o

0


0

o

o




0


o



0





U3


c



i

t

i

'•

1
1



1
1


t




t




0





I
1
1
1

1
1
1
1

1
I



t
t


1



1



in

to





i
i

i

i
i
i
i

i
i



i
i


i
i


i
i




00
CM




1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1

1
1



1


1
1


1
1




to



I-
*» IX) 0) --.
f(J O»
t/7 Of
+* H- r«*
41588

8

•s

i

(A
g
«
0

i



1

i



1

X



1

c
spuos
papuadsns


o

o


o

o

o




o


o



0





to


c



i
i
i

i

i

i




i
i


i
i


i
i




CM






1
1
1

1
1
1
1

1




1
1


t
1


1





to





1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1

1




1
1


f
1


1
1




CT.





1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1

1
1



1


1
1


i
i




^



i=
|o|t
<-> co in
^1 1- o1^
< o cte

g
f
01
0

i


C
O
(0
'o
o

*



1

19



1

X
£



1

c
aE
pUPUIdQ
U3&A~X()


o

o


o

o

o




o


0



0





to





1
i
i


i

i
1

I




i
1


i
1



1




O






1
1
1

1

1
1

1




1
1


f
1


1
1




o

V




1



1

1
1

1




1
1


1
t


1





1
1




1
1
t
1

1
1
1






1
1


1
1


1
1




1
1


c
i
^llflJ-i
S 1^ T- ^— ftl •
I-S83S55
CA
c
o
•M
0)
I/)
J3
o
**-
o

i

(A
C
O
*o
<*-
o

£
_
E
8
i

1

-—'
E
8
P

X

-"*
E
8

C
•E
SIUOMIOO
                         VII-61

-------
Table VII-11.    Capacity  of Runoff Retention Basins and Volume of 24-Hour Storm Runoff
                (MSDGC, 1972c through 197Zg and 19731 through 1973k;  Enviro Control,
                Inc..  1976}
                Runoff Retention Basins

Field
Number
1

2

3
4
5
6

7

8

9

10
11
12
13
14
-15
16
19

20

21
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
47


Basin
B-l-1
B-2-1
B-2-2
B-2-3
B-3-1
B-4-1
B-4-2
B-5-1
B-6-1
B-7-1
B-7-2
B-7-3
B-8-1
B-8-2
B-9-1
B-9-2
B-9-3
B-10-1
B-10-2
B-ll-1
B-12-1
B-13-1
B-13-2
B-14-1
B-15-1
B-16-1
B-19-1
B-20-1
8-20-2
B-20-3
B-21-1
B-22-1
B-22-2
B-23-1
B-25-1
B-25-2
B-26-1
B-26-2
B-27-1
B-27-2
B-28-1
B-29-1
B-30-1
B-30-2
B-31-1
B-32-1
B-33
B-34-1
B-34-2
B-35-1
B-36-1
B-37-1
NA
B-39-1
B-40-1
B-41-1
B-42-1
B-42-2
B-43-1
B-44-1
B-45-1
B-47-1
Capacity
Per Basin
(acre-ft)
24.4
21.5
4.1
2.9
NA
6.2
25.9
15.3
6.6
5.9
16.0
17.0
25.2
6.4
NA
13.7
4.9
21.5
23.0
8.0
11.0
9.5
39.5
14.3
10.5
70.3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
14.9
6.9
7.5
13.8
8.8
17.5
7.1
13.5
14.9
7.2
20.1
9.3
15.8
*
26.4
12.3
14.2**
78.8
35.7
NA
14.6
30.7
23.3
33.3
24.4
23.1
11.6
48.1
12.5
Capacity
Per Field
(acre-ft)
24.4

28.5

NA
32.1
15.3
6.6

38.9

31.6

>18.6

44.5
8.0
11.0
48.5
14.3
10.5
70.3
NA

NA

NA
NA
14.9
14.4
22.6
24.6
13.5
14.9
27.3
9.3
15.8
38.7
93.0
35.7
NA
14.6
30.7
23.3
57.7
23.1
11.6
48.1
12.5
                                                   24-Hr.  Runoff Assuming  No
                                                     Ground Percolation  or
                                                  Evapotranspiration (acre-ft)
25-Yr. Storm
20.1
22.7
17.9
35.0
13.1
6.6
48.1
31.1
76.5
41.1
9.2
11.8
15.7
30.6
9.6
65.6
16.6
49.9
17.1
22.7
9.6
16.6
28.0
18.8
13.6
17.1
30.2
8.1
14.9
31.3
79.4
30.1
23.7
18,4
35.9
24.1
70.8
25.8
14.9
63.9
13.1
100-Yr. Storm
25.0
28.3
22.3
43.5
16.3
8.2
59.8
38.6
95.2
51.2
11.4
14.7
19.6
38.1
12.0
81.6
20.7
62.0
21.2
28.3
12.0
20.7
34.8
23.4
16.9
21.2
37.5
10.1
18.5
39.0
98.8
37.5
29.5
22.9
44.6
29.9
88.2
32.1
18.5
79.4
16.3
 Note:   NA * Not Available
        *F1eld  133 drains  its runoff to Retention Basin B-32-1  of Field #32.
       **F1eld  #35 drains  its eastern portion of runoff to Retention Basin
         B-36-1  of Field #36.
                                VII-62

-------
          As discussed in Chapter IV, the vertical permeability of soils
     within the project area is estimated by laboratory tests to range
     from 10   to 10   cm/sec.   According to Casagrande's classifica-
     tion of soils by permeability, these soils are impervious, non-
     draining, or poorly draining. Areas consisting of broken shale and
                                                                        i
     sandstone slabs or blocks  may possess a permeability as high as 10
     cm/sec, at which water flows with little resistance.  However, con-
     struction is not allowed on these areas.  In any case, stormwater is
     almost totally drained to  the retention basins.  Localized ponding
     of rain water in the fields may tend to reduce total runoff volume,
     but is believed to be of minor significance.  Because the drainage
     areas of the application fields are relatively small, the runoff
     concentration times are relatively short, and little evapotranspi-
     ration occurs.   The preceding argument seems to justify the assump-
     tions on which storm runoff calculations are based.
          From the available data, only the retention basins for Fields
     #1, #2, #23 and #27 will be able to contain 25-year and 100-year storm
     runoff.  Retention basins for Fields #5, #6, #8, #10, #15, #16, and
     #31 through #37 will be able to contain 25-year but not 100-year storm
     runoff.  The retention basins for the remaining 18 fields do not have
     the capacity to contain even 25-year storm runoff.

          The preceding analysis is based on the further assumptions
     that the basins are completely empty prior to each storm, and the
     basin capacities are not diminished by sedimentation of suspended
     solids from previous storm runoff.   The effectiveness of a runoff
     basin is seriously impaired when a storm occurs before the basin
     is entirely empty.  Furthermore, emptying the basins before a pre-
     dicted storm may cause bottom sediments containing sludge parti-
     cles to be discharged to the receiving water.

4.   Potential Impacts

     Pollutant concentrations  violating  Illinois water  quality  standards
have been recorded at both background and non-background stream quality
monitoring stations with respect to sulfate, copper, iron, lead, manganese,
                               VII-63

-------
and total dissolved solids.   Runoff over strip-mined areas  and sludge
application fields are most  likely responsible for poor stream water
quality.  Substandard water  quality has also been documented for reser-
voirs at the project site.   Reservoir water quality parameters regis-
tering below state standards include sulfate,  copper, iron, lead, man-
ganese, mercury, and total  dissolved solids; these violations generally
parallel those for stream water.

     Many runoff basins with inadequate capacity for containing 25-year
and 100-year storm runoff are particularly ineffective in removing sus-
pended solids from storm runoff.  Numerous violations of effluent stand-
ards for total suspended solids and biological oxygen demand show that
the runoff retention basins  have been ineffective, resulting in silta-
tion and excess dissolved oxygen depletion in the receiving waterways
and reservoirs.  The levels  of total phosphorous and inorganic nitro-
gen in reservoir waters are  high, which is attributable to  surface run-
off and substandard effluents from runoff retention basins.  Continuous
nutrient inputs are suspected of causing eutrophication of the reservoirs
and their receiving waterways, and present a threat to associated aqua-
tic life.

5.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     The effectiveness of runoff retention basins must be upgraded
so that effluents meet required standards for total suspended solids
and biological oxygen demand.  Retarding runoff velocity and erosion
by planting grass, adequate recycling of substandard basin effluents,
increasing the capacity of runoff basins, providing additional basins,
or combinations of these measures is necessary to achieve required
effluent quality.

     Analyses of the nutrient concentrations  in effluents from runoff
basins must be performed to determine nutrient inputs into receiving
waterways and reservoirs.  These data will aid in estimating the eutro-
phi cation potential in receiving waters.  Whenever high fecal coliform
counts or dissolved oxygen levels are reported in stream or reservoir
water  samples, the responsible sources must be identified to ensure the
effective performance of the control measures.
                               VII-64

-------
F.   POTENTIAL GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION

     Groundwater quality must be assessed at wells and springs.   The quality
of samples collected from 26 wells and one spring within the project area is
discussed in this section, followed by an assessment of impacts  and recom-
mended mitigative measures.

     1.    Water Quality of Springs and Wells

          The locations of wells and springs used for monitoring groundwater
     quality are shown in Figure VII-19 (page VII-47).  From the discussion of
     groundwater hydrology in Chapter IV, the well and spring stations can be
     categorized as either background stations or stations where ground-
     water may be affected by project operations.  The background stations
     lie outside of the portion of the groundwater system associated with
     the project as of July 1975.  Pollutant concentrations at the non-
     background stations are possibly affected by seepage or percolation
     from upstream reservoirs or the sludge application fields.   Fourteen
     wells are classified as background stations, and 11 wells and the one
     spring are classified as non-background.  Possible influences of appli-
     cation fields or reservoirs on groundwater quality at each  non-back-
     ground station are presented in Table VII-12.

          More than 25 water quality parameters are analyzed for each sample.
     Trends in nitrite and nitrate nitrogen concentrations (N02+N0g - N) for
     each well or spring are discussed below, followed by a discussion
     concerning trace elements.

          a.   Nitrite and nitrate concentrations - The nitrite  and nitrate
          nitrogen concentration in each well or spring is plotted from
          August 1973 to May 1975 (see Appendix C).  Trends in these con-
          centrations were analyzed by the least square method.   Both back-
          ground and non-background stations have recorded trends of increas-
          ing, decreasing, or constant nitrite and nitrate levels.  Only non-
          background wells W8 and W10 report concentrations in excess of
                                  VII-65

-------
                 Table VII-12.    Classification  of Monitoring  Wells
                                 (Enviro  Control,  Inc.,  1976)
       Wells Representing  the
       Background Conditions
Well        Project Relationship

 Wl       Upstream from the pro-
          ject area.

 W4       In the community  of Cuba
          and upstream from the pro-
          ject area.

 W6       No nearby fields  or fields
          upstream.

 W15      No fields upstream.

 W16      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

 W17      Probably, on or near
          groundwater ridge.

 W18      Probably on or near
          groundwater ridge,  and
          no fields upstream.

 W19      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

 W20      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

 W21      Probably on or near
          groundwater ridge,  and
          no fields upstream.

 W24      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

 W25      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

 W26      No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.

          No fields nearby  or up-
          stream in operation yet.
       Wells Possibly Affected
	by Project Operations	
Well        Project Relationship

 W2       Possibly affected by Reser-
          voir R2, and Fields 125, #27,
         •and #38.

 W7       Possibly affected by Fields
          #26 and #38.

 W8       Possibly affected by Fields
          #20 and #21.

 W9       Possibly affected by Field
          #19.

 W10      Possibly affected by Field
          #24.

 Wll      Possibly affected by sludge
          holding basins; Fields #3
          through #9, and #17; and Reser-
          voirs RIO and R12.

 W12      Same as Wll.

 W13      Same as Wll, and addition-
          ally affected by Field #2.

 W14      Possibly affected by Fields #
          6 through #9, and #17; and
          Reservoir RIO.

 W22      Possibly affected by Fields #
          27, #37, and #38; and Reser-
          voirs R2 and R4.

 W23      Possibly affected by Field
          #31.

Spring    Possibly affected by Field
          #10.
                                       VII-66

-------
10 mg/1, which is recommended as the maximum level by the U.S.
Public Health Service (U.S. Public Health Service, 1962, 1969).
According to extrapolated upward trends, wells W4 and W20 could
acquire nitrite and nitrate nitrogen levels higher than 10 mg/1
after the next 20 years.  It must be noted that Well W4 is located
in Cuba and is possibly affected by community pollution sources.

     Wells W8 and W10, possibly contaminated by sludge applica-
tion to Fields #20, #21 and #24, could have nitrite and nitrate
nitrogen levels as high as approximately 75 and 145 mg/1, respec-
tively, by mid-1995.  The projection of W8 well water quality may
not be reliable because Well W8 has consistently low levels of
nitrite and nitrate nitrogen, with the exception of a spike be-
tween January and May 1975; a similar condition exists in Well W2.
Certainly a longer monitoring period would be required to confirm
the upward trends in these wells.

     The fluctuation in nitrite and nitrate nitrogen levels does
not seem to follow any particular pattern.  For wells conceivably
affected by project operations, the variations in nitrite and ni-
trate levels do not correlate with project activities.  In addi-
tion, the levels are generally lower than 0.2 mg/1, except for
Well W10 which  possesses consistently high values.  These findings
suggest that a large portion of nitrogen in the applied sludge is
fixed by soil molecules, converted and released as ammonia gas,
or taken up by crops for biosynthesis.  Apparently, little solu-
ble nitrogen is available for leaching into the groundwater sys-
tem.  Wells Wll, W12, and W13, conceivably vulnerable to seepage
from holding basins, have consistently shown less than 0.2 mg/1
of nitrite and nitrate nitrogen.  This indicates that the clay
linings in the four basins have been effective.

     The possible effects of increasing application rates or ac-
cumulation of sludge in the fields on groundwater nitrogen levels
cannot be assessed at this early stage of project development.
Data are not sufficient for analysis of trends, and long-term


                       VII-67

-------
    monitoring  of groundwater quality is required to establish the
    relationship between project operations and the nitrite and
    nitrate  nitrogen  level.  Study of the movements of  labeled ni-
    trogen compounds  or isotopes in the soil and in the ground-
    water system would assist in this assessment.

    b.    Trace  element and other concentrations - Variations  in
    groundwater constituents are shown in Table VII-13.  The  range
    of  variation is  given for seven calendar periods, either  before
    or  during the sludge application season.  The well  reporting
    the maximum level of a given constituent is indicated  in  paren-
    theses,  and underlined well numbers indicate those wells  possibly
    affected by sludge application.

          The pH values, alkalinity, conductivity, and concentrations
    of  total phosphorus, SO., Ca,  K, Na, Al, Fe, Mg, Mn, Hg,  Ni,  Se,
    and fecal coliforms remain  close to the 1971 and 1972  baseline
    conditions  (see  Chapter  IV).   Recent concentrations of Cd, Cr,
    Cu, Pb and  Zn are lower  than the baseline concentrations.   In
     1971 and 1972, 40% of the wells tested  contained excessively
    high levels of chemical  constituents.   When retested between  1973
    and 1975, after  the project had begun,  the statistic was  the  same.
    Groundwater constituents are,  therefore, probably influenced  by
     sources  unrelated to the project.

2.   Potential Impacts

    Apparently  most  groundwater constituents have been  little in-
fluenced by project operations at this early stage of project  devel-
opment.   The  variations  in their concentrations are  influenced pri-
marily by the geochemical characteristics of abandoned strip mines,
such as  heavy metals  in  exposed  black shale.  The variations in
groundwater quality at both  background and  non-background stations
are comparable.  Therefore,  soils are probably functioning  well  as a
                            VII-68

-------
I
1
01
.a
•o c
3 I/I
~ IQ
v> a
in "*
>,m PS, c
^ "" cn"«
t. *—
3 a
"O c

cn*c7
•o o
3 in
r- (Q
V) 0)
t/i
p- in in
•*- r*. PN, c
4 +•
23
OT-
"4- i —
1!
OJ- — -
CT) C
•o o
3 in
*— «
t/
to ^ i*^ c
§.5; 2 5
* c 3


•gg
&-S
•O O
3 V
*v> a
ai «*• PS, c
c P— en c

cn «
c c
L. ^
3 CX
•o a
— . ' IQ
3 v
US
t/)
"P~ ^ PS, C
5"2*~^
£3
Oi-
H- •—
US

11
US
*J CO *"
3rs cn o
3 •— -4->
< gg
i. ^
11
(U cn
t- 3*C:
«J i— O
o-" ""S
cn a> IQ
-4Jr- S. «_.
cn
rors!«-S
CO O°-«-^
iiit
co in o o
* o
o



xtS S


CO CO
f— ro«* *
COCJCO P^
i i i i
cn p^. o o
• O

o
555

O O"i
r- co •— cn
i i i i
O"> CM O O


O


§i§
CO
COCMt— CsJ
* * O *

1 1 1 1
r- O CM O
P*.


»-^«— •»*— .
^ F— CM
CM CM f—
3B3E 2

ID
P's O
CO O CO ^
till
• o in
10 •
o

£^5
vo
in <•
. . CM *
11(1
O Ps ^-VO
* o

o
III


in ^~
^^cn °«
Ps, O CO r—
O 9 CM CO

PS, •
o
III



a.
r—


^LtSr;0,
i




S


^^^

5


8
ro
r—
o

CM

CM

2

o
CNJ




5

§

o
CM


1

§
^
1
O
m



CM
o
CM
S


i


o
^*
1
CM
CM

1

>»^
•- o
C 10
•^ CJ
10 (A
J£ A






































































*-s<~i VO CO
cn|«*- CM CM
•"—""—* s--s—
o
min LAO
CM *t r- *D CO
III II
8R° mo


f 	 ^^ ^»«.

5l5iS 5 3:


CM PS. O O
"CM CO CO •
CO 10 »— lO ID
III II
oco O rso
CM ^r


p— Icnw CM CM CM

§
co in o o
*cn v0 o •
til ii
O CM P— CO O
CM m
in



sfelss^s
8
ai a, oo
ro irt »— to to
o«- o in o
to cxi



^TcMp S^
S5§ §s

8
in cn CM
• «r m •— o
in in P- \o »—
o<- J- CMO




ill II
S
"-tSo. So
co in #— M3 ro
cCS-1 ?°


ill II

CO
00 " cn
• co cn f— •
co in r— 10 ^~
iii ii
CM CO O CO O
cn in


i|| ||

£
•^

CJ
3
TJ
c
O 
1
O



3

to
^
o





si
to

o
1
o



CNJ
Cd

CM
O
1
O




ro
JB
to
o
o
o


ro
3


S
o
1
o

o
i1







3
&II
3Ep— -"*—

in in
So
r-O
O


<-s
-s.C\J



CM
O "^

OO



sg
^^
ID
r— IT
Ps. •
^ C

o

*-s-— ,
co [co

ID


oo



II

e» ro
^-o
CMO

O


*-wcn
§fe
•— C5

O

11


in JS
ro •
r-O


o

It







i2!£





































































1
s-»

LA
1
CNJ


•••- ••
CM



o
qf
1
CM
CO


CNJ
3


in
PS,
fT
1
O
CO


*-^
CM
3

CM

1
00
CM



CNJ
3

CO
m
r





O
0


CM
3C


o
CO
1



i







f
111


Ktoco
rood
i i I O
CNJOO
o
o



5 13
•w^«^>

in
cn to
CO O
I I OO
00



II
™™^^"*
o
r"!
"r^oo
t— O
o

o


%_'^_<'-a^
CO
vo cn CM
|sl O O O
1 1 1
ooo



II

*!*

T?oo
o o




Hi
O C7>CNJ
co do
till
OCMO 1
d

iii


? Wr-
r^dd
iiii
r-OO 1
O

d
i"!!1!1







^ 5>5^j
I
*— '

CM
cn
o




r^.


CO
,_
1
o



ro"
"* '
in
^J
o




ro

in


o



§


CO
0




CO
5
to
1
o


i


•j
^
^



1







c
o
^^

o
in
CO
o




S



CM
1
O



o"
°*^

«.
1
0





3

o

1
o







o




i
CM
<£







o



1
in o
E2
o --

"o
u

IO

-------
biochemical filter for the removal,  conversion,  and fixation of con-
taminants from sludges.   Water quality at wells  downstream from the
sludge holding basins  cannot  be differentiated from the  quality of
background wells.

     Wells W4, W8, W10,  and W20 indicate a trend of nitrite and ni-
trate nitrogen build-up.   Concentrations at background Wells W4 and
W20 are projected to exceed the 10 mg/1  drinking water standard for
nitrite and nitrate nitrogen  by 1988 and 1993, respectively.  Well
W8, possibly influenced  by sludge application, could exceed the drink-
ing water standard for nitrite and nitrate nitrogen by 1977.  The exist-
ing nitrite and nitrate  nitrogen level  in Well W10  presently violates
the U.S. Public Health Service standard  for drinking water, and is  de-
teriorating at a rate  of 0.5  mg/1  per month.   In the absence of com-
plete groundwater flow data,  sources of  contamination of Wells W8 and
W10 cannot be identified.   Also, water quality data is insufficient for
a long-range projection  of groundwater quality.

3.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     Groundwater quality monitoring  and  analysis should  be continued
to detect possible contamination from the project.   Whenever excep-
tionally poor groundwater quality is documented, responsible sources
of contamination should  be identified and effective control  measures
implemented.  Injection  of tracers such  as chemical  isotopes into up-
stream wells, and subsequent  tracer  detection  in other wells will help
to reveal the direction  and velocity of  groundwater movement around
the project area.   This  knowledge would  aid the  identification of con-
taminant sources,  especially  in distinguishing project sources from
strip-mine sources of pollution.
                             VII-70

-------
G.   POTENTIAL SOIL CONTAMINATION

     Potential soil contamination from the application of stabilized muni-
cipal sludge has been a topic of public concern.  The problems are pri-
.marily focused upon the possible build-up of trace metals or toxic materials
in the soil, particularly in the root zone.  The soil composition and possi-
ble soil contamination problems are discussed below.  Potential impacts and
desirable safeguards are considered.

     1.   Chemical Concentrations at Soil Boring Sites

          Over 52 soil borings were made to bedrock to determine the phy-
     sical and chemical characteristics of soils and rocks.  Physical soil
     characteristics, such as permeability, were used to examine potential
     groundwater contamination from the project.

          The chemical composition of both mining spoils and place land is
     summarized in Table VII-14.  Included are the mean, maximum, and mini-
     mum values of exchangeable calcium, organic carbon, and hydrochloric
     acid-extractable metals such as  Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni, and Zn.
     In general, the spoil material and place land have approximately equal
     concentrations.  The mining spoil contains significantly higher levels
     of cadmium and copper.  This is believed to be the result of past strip-
     mining activities.  The spoil materials contain more exchangeable cal-
     cium but less organic carbon than place land.  The higher organic car-
     bon content of the place land indicates that it is more fertile.

          The proposed second set of soil borings to follow the first 5 years
     of project operation has not been made as yet.  Therefore, no compara-
     tive study can be done to determine any changes in soil structure or
     chemistry.

     2.   Potential Impacts

          Due to the paucity of data, impacts on the soil quality resulting
     from the project cannot be defined.  However, some speculated impacts
                                 VII-71

-------
    0)
i—  -M
 rt3  c/)
•i-  o>
 S-  CD
 O)  -1-
4->  Q
 O  O
 Q.T-
OO  -4->
    (O
t-  U
 o  ••-
 c  Q.
 a)  <:
+j
 c  cu
 o  -E
O  -f->

 o  o
•I-  -t->
 cn o
 S- •!-
O i-
    CL.
-o
 t= >>
 10 +J
    c
  « 3
 E O
 3 O*— »
•i-    C\J
 o c r»
i — O CT>
 (Q -M r—
C_> r—
    3  en
 0) Ll_  E

S c  tl
 (O -i-  Q.
 oj    oo
 C75 t/1
 C "O   «
  T3  3
 Ol C i —
S 03 00
 ^1-


 O)
o z
20
<£ CD ^P
Ti «^» C^^
gg

x' _
OCu vp
r •* C^
xtJ
UJ

^g



-O
Q_
#• —1
3 58
i s
c »- z

X >
111 o
a •«, &
X o
z| »

• •"•*
O CJ

g.
INI


C.
35*





Q
UJ
LLJ -J
t °-
co ^
CO

*~ ^ CD
«0 CM 10
OB »
0 T-

CO CO CM
CO CO T-
6 6 -:
OJ •* O
O 00 CM
IO CO CD

CM O
IO O «O
co co
N. CM °.
co co' J£

CM O
CM 0 t
T^ CO*
•
. °i o co
° ^-"

CD O *-
^* CJ5 • ,T*
•*' - ^

**: ^ *•
T- *^ O)
CO ^- «0


_k CO
5 ? o
5;: ^ CM





CO
o

w 2 ? i
< 1 x
UJ S <
•^- CM tf>
CO O) >O
•^ CD ^

CD O CM
CO CM ts.
d o o
O l»- *~
•t i- ^t
IO CO N.

10 CO Tj-
IO CM O)
"* CM N!
U3 CM ^
i^" co' c^J

CO O h-
CM CO T-
. *-" CD CO

CO CO
0 0 CD
6 • o"

CM CO CO
CD <*- N.
CM* ^ CO*

•*• co r^
z ° g

__ CO
^ 0 -
CD cxj 00
•^ .— . IO
T- Vl CM


Q


UJ
O ^ ^
< D §
— 1 Z 2 -
n < 5: x
UJ Z <
0
0
u.
o
CO
o:
UJ
fj
_j
2
to

I
H
O
CO
CO
2
^
cc
CD
IO
u.
o
CO
z
0
i 	
r—
O
QC
• 	
t—
X
UJ
111
-J
z
2


UJ
CO
CO
UJ
o
o
CO
ULJ
UJ
tr
X
*
                                                               VII-72

-------
are discussed below.  The purpose of this discussion is to provide
an orientation for the analyses of the follow-up soil  borings, so
that complete delineation and assessment of possible problems can
be achieved.

     It is suspected that high concentrations of soluble salts in
the sludge may affect soil chemistry and plant growth, possibly
causing excessive plant uptake of toxic materials or trace metals.
Allison (1964) stated that salts directly affect plant growth by
increasing the osmotic pressure of the soil solution,  altering
mineral nutrition, and causing toxic accumulations of specific ions
in the plants.

     The trace elements in municipal wastes may occur largely in  ,
association with complex organic polyanions.  This interaction be-
tween heavy metals and humic, polymeric substances in the sludge  .
and soil may have a profound effect upon the mobility and toxicity
of metal ions when sewage sludge is applied to agricultural  soils.
The reactions of metal ions in the soil solution include solution,
oxidation, reduction, precipitation, adsorption, absorption, and
complexation, all of which may result in a build-up of trace metals.
In terms of complexation, the University of Illinois has developed
a mathematical model based on Schubert's ion exchange equilibrium
technique.  The model can measure stability constants  of metal-
polyelectrolyte complexes naturally occurring in soils and digested
sewage sludge, and may be useful in predicting the fate of heavy me-
tals applied as constituents of stabilized municipal sludges (Hinesly
et al., 1971).

     A review of literature  and studies on the build-up of trace
elements in soils receiving sewage sludge is provided  in Chapter IX.
The subsequent effects of trace element build-up in soil on crop
growth and human health via biomagnification in food chains are also
discussed.
                            VII-73

-------
3.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     The most important task in delineating possible degradation of
soil quality is to perform a second series  of soil  test borings and
analyze soil characteristics,  especially in the root zone.   Physical
and chemical quality of soils  with and without sludge application
should be defined.  A comparison between properties of background
soils and soils receiving various amounts of sludge should  detect
any build-up of trace metals or toxic materials.

     Lysimeter studies in the  laboratory would help to understand the
soil chemistry and reactions controlling the fixation and mobilization
of trace elements. Results of  this type of  study  can be used to esti-
mate the capacity of soil to hold trace elements  without significant
effects on plant growth and groundwater quality.  Once the  soil capa-
city for handling trace elements is established,  the upper  limit for
sludge application can be estimated and enforced.
                            VII-74

-------
H.   POTENTIAL NOISE PROBLEMS

     Unwanted sound, referred to as noise, may be generated by most mechani-
cal equipment, including the pumps, tractors, and sludge-sprayers at the pro-
ject site.  Noise can have impacts on people ranging from simple annoyance to
psychological and physiological  stress.   Such reactions include increased
irritability, loss of concentration, nervous tension, impaired aptitude, and
loss of sleep.  The extent of the impact depends primarily on the loudness,
pitch, intermittency, and familiarity of the noise reaching sensitive human
receivers.  Noise measurement and attenuation, project noise sources and le-
vels, potential noise impact and mitigative measures are considered in this
section.

     1.   Noise Generation at the Project Site

          Noise levels are typically measured in decibels in the "A" scale
     (dBA).  The scale emphasizes a certain set of frequencies to which the
     human ear is most sensitive.  Examples of common indoor and outdoor
     noise levels are listed in  Figure VII-22.

          Noise can be attentuated before reaching sensitive human recei-
     vers.   Distance, vegetation, and topography, including hills and walls,
     can reduce noise levels significantly.  For example, a 5-foot wall  has
     been shown to reduce highway noise by five dBA (Sexton, 1969).   Vege-
     tation must be quite dense  to attenuate noise.   In an area of dense
     evergreen woods with a visibility of 70 to 100 feet, the attenuation
     of sound is approximately 18 dBA per 1,000 feet.   Trees with trunks
     6 to 8 feet high and spaced about 10 feet apart provide no attenua-
     tion (Embleton and Thiessen, 1962).   Planting vegetation to improve
     the aesthetic appearance of the noise-generating site has been shown
     to reduce local sensitivity to noise without actually reducing the
     noise levels (Sexton, 1969).

          The project is located in a remote rural  area.   The closest com-
     munities are Canton, Cuba,  St.  Davis, and Bryant,  with a combined
     population of less than 15,000.  The ambient noise level  is similar to
     that of typical rural areas and is  estimated to be not more than 45 dBA
     90% of the time, which is designated the 10-percentile noise level.

                                VII-75

-------
COMMON OUTDOOR
NOISE LEVELS
Jet Flyover at 1000 ft
Gas Lawn Mower at 3 ft
Diesel Truck at 50 ft

Noisy Urban Daytime
Commercial Area
Heavy Traffic at 300 ft


Quiet Urban Daytime


Quiet Urban Nighttime

Quiet Suburban Nighttime


Quiet Rural Nighttime
    NOISE LEVEL
        (dBA)

      -i-llO
                               -4-100
                               + 90
      + 80
Gas Lawn Mower at 100 ft        -j- 70
      + 60
          50
      + 40
      + 3O
                               + 20
                               +  10
                               -L  0
COMMON  INDOOR
NOISE LEVELS

Rock Band
Inside Subway Train (New York)


Food Blender at 3 ft

Garbage Disposal at 3ft
Shouting at 3ft

Vacuum Cleaner at 10 ft

Normal Speech at 3 ft

Large Business Office

Dishwasher Next  Room
 Small Theatre, Large Conference Room
 (Background)
 Library

 Bedroom at Night
 Concert Hall (Background)
                                             Broadcast and Recording Studio
                                             Threshold of Hearing
          Figure VII-22.
Common Indoor and Outdoor Noise Levels
(U.S. Department of Transportation, 1973)
                                 VII-76

-------
           Sources of noise  in the environment of the project include trac-
      tors on the adjacent farms and occasional motor vehicles on highways
      and local roads.  Because the traffic is light, these sources do not
      contribute significantly to the ambient or background noise level.
      Sources of noise  related to the project include pumps, tractors, and
      sludge sprayers.  Three pumping or  sludge distribution stations are
      located within project property, and one booster station is situated
      at the Liverpool  dock.  The pumping stations on the project site are
      at least one mile from the nearest  farmstead.  However, the booster
      station at the Liverpool dock and barge pumps are within a half-mile
      radius of Liverpool, which had a population of 218 in 1970 (U.S.
      Bureau of Census, 1972).  Tractors, trucks, and sludge sprayers are
      mobile noise sources.  This equipment will generate noise detected by
      sensitive receptors only when in operation near the boundary of pro-
      ject property.

           The typical  ranges of sound pressure levels from pumps and vehi-
      cles are shown in Figures VII-23 and VII-24.  As a conservative esti-
      mate, the noise level  for an unenclosed pump is about 95.dBA 3 feet
      away from the pump, and about 80 dBA 25 feet from a tractor and sprayer.
      The noise levels  at different distances from these sources are derived
      from the dissipation law of sound pressure and are shown below in
      Table VII-15.  These values were calculated assuming the absence of <
      sound barriers such as buildings, dense vegetation, and terrain with
      high relief.
            Table  VII-15.    Noise Level  in dBA of Various Noise
                             Sources as a Function of Distance
                             (Enviro Control, Inc., 1976)
                                Distance from Noise Source
Noise Source  3 ft.  25 ft.  100 ft:  800 ft.  1,600 ft.  3.200 ft.   5,280 ft.
Pump without
Enclosure
Tractor
and Sprayer
95
86

80
80
                74
71
         65
68
          62
64
           59
63
           57
                                   VII-77

-------
IUU
CM
.£ 90
Z
O

/
/
/









" ' 	 •-
















—
~-








/


f
/














>










^'
^


















"~-i^
• — *









^^^




















^^.
^^^







^^
/
X




















»^^
^""""•s^






l\
\
\






















\
X






^
^s*"s^
^^fc














31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 80(
        OCTAVE BAND CENTER FREQUENCY IN Hz
Figure VII-23.
Range of Sound  Pressure Levels from Pumps
(Measured at 3  ft.) (Curves  Represent Upper
and Lower Boundaries of Range), (U.S. EPA,
1971a).
                       VII-78

-------
      90
f
8
 £
     80
rs
  5
I
.5?
 '
     60
     50
                    Heavy Trucks
                                                    Highway Buses
                                                   Range
                                           Passenger Can
                                  ..... Mean Levels
J     I     I     I
                                                  I     I     I
         0   To     20    30    40    50    60    70   80
                            Speed - Miles per Hour
           Figure VII-24.   Single Vehicle Noise Output as a
                           Function of Vehicle Speed (U.S. EPA,  1971b).
                                VII-79

-------
2.    Potential  Impacts

     Noise impacts from the pumping station are minimized because
of a one-mile buffer distance between the station and the closest
farm families.   Considering further dissipation of noise by build-
ings, vegetation and topography, the noise level of pumps at a one-
mile distance should be less than 60 dBA.  This level is acceptable
for residential areas, as recommended by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (U.S. Department of Housing and Ur-
ban Development, 1971 and 1972).

     Noise generated by pumps at the Liverpool dock and by barge
pumps will somewhat increase the ambient noise level around the
community of Liverpool.  Impacts from this intermittent noise can-
not be quantified in the absence of noise data; however, they
should not be severe.

3.   Mitigation of Adverse Effects

     Assuming the minimum buffer distance that can be maintained
between the mobile sprayer unit and the nearest sensitive receptor
to be 400 feet, the noise level would be 68 dBA at the receptor
during spraying operation.  This situation occurs only at Fields
#31 and #34 through #37.  The sludge sprayer is operated only dur-
ing the daytime and seldom remains at one location longer than half
an hour.  The average upper 10 percentile noise level (L-ig) of the
mobile sprayer is estimated to be less than 60 dBA at the receptor
and is compatible with residential land use.
                            VII-80

-------
                               BIBLIOGRAPHY


Allison, L. E., "Salinity in Relation to Irrigation," Advances in Agronomy,
V. 16, 1965.

Campell, R. S. and 0. T. Lind, "Water Quality and  Aging in Strip Mined Lakes,"
Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V. 41, No. 11, 1969.

Dalton, F.  E. and R. R. Murphy, "Land Disposal IV:  Reclamation and Re-
cycle," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, V. 45, No. 7, July 1973.

Durfer, C.  N. and E. Becker, Geological Water Supply Paper, U.S. Department
of the Interior, 1965.

Embleton, T. F. W. and G. J. Thiessen, "Train Noises and Use of Adjacent Land,"
Sound, January-February 1962.

Fair, G. M., J. C. Geyer, and J. C. Morris, Water Supply and Waste»=Water Dis-
posal , John Wiley Sons, Inc.:  New York, 1954.

Fletcher, N. H., "The Physics of Ra,in Clouds," (Chapter 6), Cambridge Univer-,
sity  Press, 1962.

Fuchs, Aerosol Mechanics. Pergamon Press: New York, 1964.

Hanna, S. R., "Fog and Drift Deposition from Evaporative Cooling Towers,"
Nuclear Safety, V. 15, No. 2, March-April 1974.
Hinesly, T. D., et al., Agricultural Benefits and Environmental Changes Re-
sulting from the Use of Digested Slud
versity of Illinois for the MSDGC, 19
suiting from the Use of Digested Sludge on Field Crops,  prepared  by  the  Uni-
         "*"!   =              "71.
Junge, C. E., "Air Chemistry and Radioactivity," Institute of Meteorology
and Geophysics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Germany; International Geo-
physics Series, V. 4; Academic Press:  1963.

Leonardos, G., D. Kendall and N. Barnard, "Odor Threshold Determinations of
53 Odorant Chemicals," Journal^ of the Air Pollution Control Association.
V. 19, No. 2, February 1969.

Mackay, D. and P. J. Leinonen, "Rate of Evaporation of Low-Solubility Con-
taminants from Water Bodies to Atmosphere," Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, V. 9, No. 13, December 1975.

Midwest Research Institute, Studies of the Fulton County, Illinois Land Spread-
ing Operation:  "Studies of Odor Complaints in Fulton County," (Part II), pre-
pared for the Fulton County Health Department, January 1974.

MSDGC, Ammonia Volatilization and Ammonia Fixation by Sludge Fertilized Cal-
careous Strip-Mined Spoil Material, presented at the annual meeting of the
American Society of Agronomy (November 1973), MSDGC R&D Department, May 1974.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation. Stage 1,
Zone 1, 1972c.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage 2,
Zone 1, 1972d.

                                    VII-81

-------
MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage 3,
1972e.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation fcvr Land Reclamation, Stage 4,
1972f.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation. Stage 5,
1972g.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage 6,
1973i.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation, Stage 7,
1973J.

MSDGC, Contract Plans for the Site Preparation for Land Reclamation. Stage 9,
1973k.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
Third Quarter, 1972a.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
Fourth Quarter, 1972b.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
First Quarter, 1973a.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
Second Quarter, 19735.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
Third Quarter, 1973c.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois.
August 1973d through  December 1973h.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
January 1974a through December 19741.

MSDGC, Environmental  Protection System Report  for  Fulton County,  Illinois,
January 1975a through July 1975g.

MSDGC, The Utilization of Municipal  Sludge in  Agriculture,  presented at
United States/Soviet  Seminar on Handling,  Treatment,  and Disposal  of Sludges,
U.S.S.R., May 1975h.

Sexton, B. H., "Traffic Noise," Traffic Quarterly. July 1969.

Squires, P., The Growth of Cloud Drops by  Condensation:  "General  Charac-
teristics," (Chapter  I), Division of Radiophysics, C.S.I.R.O.,  Sydney,  Aug-
ust 1951.
                                  VII-82

-------
Turner, D. B., Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Programs, revised 1970.

U.S. Bureau of Census, County and City Data Book. U.S.  Department of Commerce,
1972.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Noise Assessment Guidelines,
August 1971.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Noise Assessment Guide-
lines - Technical^ Background, 1972.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Fundamentals and Abatement of Highway
Traffic Noise, 1973.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Evaluation of Land Application Systems.
Office of Water Program Operations,  March 1975.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Noise from Construction Equipment and
Operations. Building Equipment, and  Home Appliances, prepared by Bolt,  Ber-
anek and Newman, December 1971 a.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Transportation Noise and Noise From
Equipment Powered b
tories, December 19
Equipment Powered by Internal  Combustion Engines,  prepared  by  Wyle  Labora-
                   71b.
U.S. Public Health Service, Drinking Water Standards,  U.S.  Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare, 1962.

U.S. Public Health Service, Manual  for Evaluating Public Drinking Mater Sup-
plies, U.S. Department of Health,  Education,  and Welfare, 1969.
                                  VII-83

-------

-------
                VIII.   DIRECT  HEALTH  EFFECTS  OF  THE  PROJECT

     Sludge contains toxic substances such as heavy metals and also may
contain human and animal pathogens and parasites.  If humans or animals
are exposed to these hazardous components in sufficient quantities, ad-
verse health effects could result.  There are two routes by which these
components could be transferred from the sludge to the receptor:  the
direct route, as in the inhalation of airborne particles; and the indirect
route, as in the uptake of heavy metals by plants consumed by animals or
man.  Indirect health effects are discussed in the next chapter.  This
chapter deals with the direct health effects, in terms of theoretical
considerations and estimated potential health hazards from airborne path-
ogens and toxic substances.  The chapter concludes with recommended mea-
sures to prevent or mitigate direct health hazards.

A.   THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ASSESSING DIRECT  HEALTH EFFECTS OF
     SLUDGE AEROSOLS

     Among all methods of sludge application, pressurized spraying offers
the greatest potential for direct transfer of hazardous components to hu-
mans or animals.  Inhalation presents an opportunity for protracted and
repetitive exposure and does not necessarily stimulate preventive action
by those at risk.  In contrast, entry through a wound or by hand-to-mouth
transfer occurs only occasionally and is likely to be consciously avoided.
The largest source of inhalable material per unit of sludge applied is pres-
surized spraying.  Lightly pressurized sprinkling or other irrigation re-
leases a lesser amount, and other methods can be classified as negligible
sources.

     1.   Pressurized Spraying

          This section examines the phenomenon of aerosol formation, the
     origin and survival of pathogens in sludge, and the presence of toxic
     substances.
                              VIII-l

-------
a.   Aerosolization of sludge particles  -  Any  spraying operation
is a potential  source of aerosol  particles,  even  if carefully de-
signed and operated to deposit large  droplets  in  the immediate
vicinity.   The  separation of a liquid jet  into drops is accompanied
by the generation of very small  "satellite"  droplets when  the li-
quid thread connecting two drops  is broken.  A film of liquid simi-
larly separates into large and small  drops.  These  aqueous droplets
evaporate  rapidly until  their vapor pressure equilibrates  with the
partial pressure of water vapor  in the atmosphere.   Suspended and
dissolved  substances, as are found in sludge,  leave a residual
particle containing some water retained  by physical  or chemical
processes.

     The size of the  equilibrated particle depends on  the non-
volatile residue.  If the bulk density of  this is close to one,
size follows directly from the wet droplet size and composition.
For example, a  15- ^-diameter droplet containing  4% solids will
decrease in volume to 1/25,  and  the diameter will decrease by
I/ ^y25 or approximately 1/3, becoming  about  5y  .   This calcula-
tion can be used if engineering  data  on  a  spraying  system  is  avail-
able, and  will  determine the amount of sprayed material that  will
form particles  small enough  to remain airborne, and hence  the
amount in  readily inhalable  form.  In the  present case, there are
neither direct  measurements  of airborne  quantities  nor the data
necessary  for calculation.   This  analysis  must therefore rely up-
on intelligent  estimates and data from systems elsewhere.

     The total  non-volatile  content of the sludge influences  the
particle size.   Analysis of the sludge determines the amount  of
hazardous  material in each particle.   It may be noted that bac-
teria, which are sizeable compared with  the  droplets (of the  order
of 1-u diameter), will not inhabit all droplets;  this is especi-
ally true  for larger amebic  cysts, helminth  eggs, and so forth.
Dissolved  substances, in contrast, are present in all particles.
                      VIII-2

-------
     From the point of view of mitigating hazards, it should be
noted that spraying can be designed to minimize, but not to eli-
minate, aerosol formation.

b.   Bacterial and viral pathogens -  •
          Before treatment, domestic wastewater usually
          contains the complete spectrum of pathogenic
          microorganisms discharged by the community...
          (Viraraghavan [1973], quoting Greenberg and
          Dean [1958], Rudolfs et al.  [1950a,19505]).
          Crude sewage contains all the [types of] agents
          causing infectious disease in man — bacteria,
          viruses, protozoa, intestinal parasites excre-
          ted through the intestinal tract.  Of these, or-
          ganisms of the Salmonella group, which are widely
          distributed in man and animals, are by far the most
          common in developed countries.  ("McCoy, 1971)

     Although greatly reduced in number, many pathogens survive waste-
water treatment, including salmonellas, Mycobacterium tuberculosis,
and many enteroviruses  (viruses of the gastrointestinal tract).  These
may even survive chlorination, and it has been shown that the ab-
sence of coliforms does not necessarily indicate virus inactivation
(Allen et al.. 1949; Sorber, 1973; Kruze et a!., 1970; D'ltri et al.,
u/d).  The microbial population of sludge is greatly reduced by
holding for a few weeks, but is not eliminated completely.

     Pathogens may be present in sludge even after months of la-
gooning.  A major factor influencing their presence and quantity
is the community's discharges into the system, which may be ex-
pected to be highly variable.  Sources are human and animal and
they include slaughter houses, the meat products industry, poultry
and egg processing plants, tanneries, and many others (McCoy, 1971).
It is evident that the nature and concentrations of pathogens
entering and potentially surviving treatment must vary widely
from place to place and time to time.  Evidence from places other
than Fulton County are therefore of little predictive value, and
samples taken in Fulton County at one point in time will not neces-
sarily be valid for other times.  For example, midday counts of
                       VIII-3

-------
E. coli  (all  x 10 /ml)  in a certain sewage effluent were  5.5  in
January 1970 and 0.18 in September  1970,  and  midnight  counts  were
0.3 in both months (McCoy,  1971).   Futhermore,  E.  coli  are  the
overwhelmingly dominant bacterial  species in  domestic  waste;  dis-
eases of seasonal and epidemic character  would  show much  wider
fluctuations.

c.   Heavy metals and other toxic  substances  -  Treatment  plants
handling a substantial  proportion  of industrial  waste  are liable
to have a considerable burden of toxic substances  in the  sludge.
Thome, Hinesly  and Jones (1975)  report  the  following figures:
      Table VIII-1.   Composition of Fresh, Heated, Anaerobically
                      Digested Sewage Sludge (Thome  et al., 1975)
Dry Sludge Basis
Typical
Concentration Concentration
Range (ppm) (ppm)
3 to 3,000 150
50 to 30,000 3,000
100 to 10,000 1,000
1 to 100 3
25 to 8,000 400

Typical
Amount
(Ib/ton)
0.3
trace
6
2
0.8
       Cadmium  (Cd)
       Chromium (Cr)
       Lead  (P  )
       Mercury  (Hg)
       Nickel  (Ni)
       For comparison, data available from Fulton County reveal an
       average  of about 450 ppm for cadmium, and a maximum concen-
       tration  of 1,125 ppm.

     It must be emphasized that the  input  rate  for  such  materials
at the treatment plant is  likely  to  vary widely,  even  during  stable
conditions of industrial  production  with discharges  occurring,  for
example, at one step in  a  batch process or during periodic  cleans-
ing.   When processes change or new processes  are  introduced,  fur-
ther variations in  the effluent may  be expected.  Consequently, a
few grab samples widely  separated in  time  may give  a highly mis-
leading indication  of average concentrations.
                     VIII-4

-------
2.   Variables of Airborne Transmission

     The purpose of this section is to identify and discuss the vari-
ables other than those associated with the sludge itself, which influ-
ence the extent of any potential hazard.

     a.   Variables at the source - The amount of material exposed to
     a downwind receptor is directly proportional to the rate and dura-
     tion of emission at the source, provided that all  other conditions
     remain constant.  It depends, therefore, on the amount of sludge
     sprayed and the proportion converted into windborne particles.
     Data is available on the rate of application, but the proportion
     aerosolized must be determined by guesswork.  From knowledge of
     similar operations, it would appear that 1% is a reasonable esti-
     mate.

          No great significance is attached to the size distribution
     of the airborne particles.  As will be pointed out later, this is
     not an important variable in most cases.  The information necessary
     to make use of this variable is not available.

          Linear dimensions of the source are important.  If a continu-
     ous point source is traversing an area, such as a mobile sludge
     sprayer in a field, the total amount arriving at the receptor will
     depend on emissions from all points in the area.  Calculation of
     dosage therefore involves the linear dimensions of the area tra-
     versed by the spraying device.

     b.   Variables in transit - If airborne particles are released at
     a given rate, the downwind concentration will vary in response to
     three influences.  The concentration is inversely proportional to
     windspeed, because this determines the downwind particle spread.
     The particles are also spread out vertically and across the wind
     by turbulent mixing of the air.  The third factor is deposition.
     For example, a 50- y particle of unit density has a settling rate
                          VIII-5

-------
of about 10 cm/sec and will  fall  through  1  meter of still  air
in 10 seconds.   However,  some particles will  remain airborne
much longer in  a turbulent atmosphere.

     Another form of physical  depletion is  from impaction  on sur-
faces.   This is not a significant factor  in the present context.
For this type of deposition  to occur,  particles must be relatively
large,  windspeed must be  high, or the  obstacle  must be very narrow;
otherwise, the  particles  simply slip by the obstacle in the stream-
lines.   Therefore, vegetative barriers cannot be expected  to effect
any substantial depletion in particles of respirable size.

     Pathogens  are subject to another  form  of depletion which can
be extensive.  Most pathogens are affected  by desiccation  and ex-
posure  to the atmosphere, and are also highly susceptible  to sun-
light or even diffuse daylight.   A pathogenic bacterium which would
have survived for weeks in aqueous suspension may be killed in sec-
onds if transferred to an airborne droplet  a  few microns in diameter
and exposed to  daylight.   It must be emphasized, however,  that this
response is extremely variable.   Some  live  microorganisms  are found
in the  upper atmosphere,  and others cannot  survive brief desiccation
in the  dark.  The composition of the suspending medium is  one of
the many controlling variables.   Other sludge ingredients  may have
a large retarding or accelerating effect  on loss of viability (Webb,
1959, 1960a, 1960b).

c.   Variables  at the receptor - A breathing  human is an active
receptor (as opposed to a passive obstacle),  "sampling" the air
and trapping particles of different sizes in  various parts  of the
respiratory tract.  The rate of "sampling"  depends upon the degree
of activity and can vary  by  one order  of  magnitude or more.  An
average figure  of 20 liters  per minute,corresponding to light acti-
vity, will be used in this analysis.   Efficiency of retention varies
from 100% for larger particles to about 25% for those least retained.
However, most of the total mass of airborne material will  be in par-
ticles  for which 100% retention is an  acceptable approximation.
                       VIII-6

-------
          Account will not be taken of the effect of particle size on
     the infectivity of some microorganisms.  It is certainly true that
     the number of microorganisms required to infect exposed subjects
     will vary greatly with particle size.  Experiments performed with
     bacterial agents in animals have shown that the infective dose is
     much less for 1-y than 10-y particles, the transition occurring at
     about 5 y and corresponding with a transition from deposition in
     the lower to the upper respiratory tract (Harper and Morton, 1953;
     Druett  et a!., 1953).  Particles less than 5 u in diameter are fre-
     quently spoken of as being in the "respirable" size range, and
     many recent papers, including several on sewage aerosol hazards,
     are written as though larger particles were not hazardous.  However,
     there is evidence that the difference is small in some cases (e.g.,
     for Pasteurella pestis in the rhesus monkey), and it may be supposed
     that enteroviruses, impacted in the upper respiratory tract and
     subsequently swallowed,can infect via the gastrointestinal tract.
     Furthermore, we are also concerned with toxic substances for which
     the portal of entry may bear little significance.

3.   Calculation of Downwind Sludge Particle Concentration

     The portion of the sprayed sludge which becomes airborne and avail-
able for inhalation, the downwind concentration, and the amount retained
in the respiratory system are all independent of the presence of patho-
gens or toxic substances.  The proportion of potentially hazardous com-
ponents is too small to affect the physical variables controlling the
characteristics of the system.  Consequently, the most convenient approach
is to calculate the exposure of downwind receptors to airborne sludge
particles, and convert this to intake of hazardous substance by using
the known or hypothesized concentration in the sludge.

     Another step that is taken to produce a general  model  applicable  to  a
range of conditions is to deal with a single day's application by one
spraying array, using typical dimensions for the operation.  These calcu-
lations can be easily used to estimate the effect of a day's operation
with different dimensions, and the cumulative effect of several opera-
tions.

                           VIII-7

-------
a.   Operational  characteristics - A typical  day's operation was
chosen to be represented by the following conditions:

     •    Application area = 24 acres or 116,160 square yards
          (assumed to be a square with 341  yd.  or 312  m side)
     •    Application rate (dry basis) = 54 dry tons total or
          2.25 tons per acre
     •    Duration of application = 12 hours
     •    Sludge solids composition = 4.5%.

These dimensions are based on information obtained from the Prairie
Plan management, stating that sludge is sprayed at a rate of 2 acres
per hour to a depth of 1/2 inch for a period of 8 to 16 hours per
day, depending upon length of the day.  On the basis of this infor-
mation, the total dry tonnages of sludge applied in one day are
presented in the following table.
      Table VIII-2.   Amount of Sludge Applied as a Function of
                      Spraying Time (assuming 4.5% solids)

      Hours per day          Acres  per day          Dry tons
           8                      16                   36
          10                      20                   45
          12                      24                   54
          16                      32                   72


     It is further assumed that 1% of the total sludge sprayed be-
comes airborne, the spray trajectory peaks at 45 ft or about 14 m,
and a 12-hour daily application period is average.  The percentage
airborne is based only on general knowledge of aerosol formation
in large-flow-rate jets.  The spray trajectory assumes a discharge
elevation of 45° and throw radius of 100 to 150 ft (Prairie Plan
staff).  The meteorological conditions assumed for the purpose of
this study are a windspeed of 5 m/sec and Stability Class B,
                        VIII-8

-------
representing most probable conditions, and a windspeed of 1 m/sec
and Stability Class D, representing worst case conditions.  These
meteorological conditions are based on an estimate of average local
daytime conditions on days suitable for sludge spraying during the
irrigation season.  It was felt that a more thorough analysis of
climatological data would not justify the considerable effort,
in view of the larger uncertainties stemming from variables of air-
borne concentration of the hazardous material and of receptor res-
ponse.

b.   Model approach - Receptor response is assumed to be proper- ,
tional to cumulative exposure, as is common for pathogens and
chronic poisons.  The source is regarded as a uniform area source,
the area being the acreage sprayed in one day.  This is assumed to
be a square with a side perpendicular to the wind, and the area
source is conveniently approximated as a crosswind line through
the center of the square.

     Lateral dispersion is treated by the virtual point source
method.  An upwind point is computed, from which emitted particles
would give a cloud width equal to the crosswind line in the given
stability conditions.  Downwind diffusion is then calculated as
though the source were at the virtual point.  Similarly, an up-
wind point (or line) is computed to give a cloud height equal to
the actual height from the top of the spray trajectory to the
ground.

     Receptors are placed at various distances downwind from the
downwind side of the square, to approximate several actual condi-
tions:

     t    100 m  --  operator or close onlooker
     •    500 m  --  nearest uninvolved bystander
     •    1000 m  --  nearest resident population cluster.
                     VIII-9

-------
c.   Model  calculations  -  The diffusion  equation  used  is

               x  =    Q


          where

               X  =  concentration  (g/nr)
               Q  =  source  emission  strength  (g/sec)
               TT  =  3.14
               ay =  crosswind standard  deviation
               GZ =  vertical  standard deviation
               u  =  windspeed (m/sec)

To calculate the source  emission  strength  (Q),  the  total  dry  weight
of sludge applied is converted to grams:

     54 tons x 2,240 Ibs/long ton x 454  g/lb =  5.5  x 106  g

The duration of the sludge application period  is  then  converted  to
seconds:

     12 hrs x 3,600 sec/hr = 4.32 x 104  sec

Source emission strength is  then  calculated using the  total dry
weight and period of duration:

     5.5 x 106 - 4.32 x  104  = 1.27  x  102 g/sec

     The area source is  approximated  as  a  312-meter crosswind cen-
terline; its standard deviation is  estimated to be  73  meters
[312 ; 4.3] (Turner, 1969).   For  Stability Class  B, representing
average  meteorological  conditions  at the  project site,  this  cor-
responds to an  upwind point source at 430 meters,  or  1,060 meters
for Stability Class D which  represents the worst case.   Total dis-
tance is calculated by adding the receptor distance to the  upwind
                     vin-io

-------
  source distance.  Table VIII-3 below presents values of the crosswind
  standard deviations (ay) for Stability Classes B and D and for
  three receptor distances.
Table VIII-3.   Values of Crosswind Standard Deviation (a )
                                                         J

Receptor Distance (m)
256
656
1156
Stability B
Total Distance,
686
1086
1586
ay
110
170
235
Stability D
Total Distance,
1316
1716
2216
av
88
112
142
       The upper boundary of the source has  been  estimated  at
  14 m above ground.   Assuming this  to  represent  two  standard  de-
  viations,  we have a 0z0 value of 7 m.   For stability  B, this cor-
  responds to an upwind ground level  source  at 70 m and for stability
  D, 160 m.   Total  distance is calculated by adding the receptor
  distance to the upwind ground level source distance.   Table  VIII-
  4 presents values of the vertical  standard deviation  (az).
 Table VIII-4    Values  of Vertical  Standard  Deviations  (a7)
Receptor Distance (m)
256
656
1156
Stability B
Total Distance, az
326 33
726 75
1226 135
Stability D
Total Distance, az
416 16
816 28
1316 38
                        VIII-11

-------
     Now the value of X for average  and  worst  easy  conditions
can be calculated as follows:
V -
A
TTC
Table VIII-5. Values of

Receptor Distance (m)
256
656
1156
Q _ Q
y a u F
Sludge Aerosol
Stability B
11 °y
3.14 110
3.14 170
3.14 235 1
Concentrations (X)
(Windspeed = 5 m/sec)
az
33
75
35
u F Q/F (g/m3)
5 5.7xl04 2.2x10"^
5 2.0x10^ 6.4xlQ-4
5 5.0xl05 2.5x10'*


Receptor Distance (m)
256
656
1156
Stability D
rr ay
3.14 88
3.14 112
3.14 142
(Windspeed = 1 m/sec)
az
16
28
38
u F Q/F (g/m3)
1 4.4xl03 2.9x10-2
1 9.8X103, 1.3x10,
1 1.7x10* 7.5xlO"J

 d.  Daily respiratory intake - Assuming that the receptor is an
 adult male engaged in light activity throughout the spraying period,
 the respiratory intake rate is equal to 20 liters per minute for
 a duration of 12 hours.  The intake would, of course, be propor-
 tionately less for a shorter exposure time.  The total inhaled
 volume  is equal to:

          20 liters/min x 12 hrs x 60 min/hr x 10"3 m3/! = 14.4 m3
                       VIII-12

-------
By multiplying the total volume inhaled by the aerosol concen-
trations (x) calculated above, a daily respiratory intake of
sludge can be determined.
        Table VIII-6.    Calculated Respiratory Intake
                        of Sludge Particles for One Day
                        of Spraying
Receptor distance  (m)

       256
       656
      1156
  Stability B
(wind 5 m/sec)
  3.2 x 10
  9.2 x 10
          -2
-3
  3.6 x 10
          -3
            Stability D
           (wind 1  m/sec)
4.2 x 10
1.9 x 10
                    -1
            1.1  x 10
-1
-1
This table also shows the daily intake in micrograms of a sub-
stance present in the sludge at 1 ppm (dry weight), and can be
used to calculate the intake of a substance present .at any other
concentration.  For example, if cadmium is present at 200 ppm,
the 256-m receptor, in stability D, will take in:
          4.2 x 10"1 x 2 x 102 = 84 ug.
     The emphasis of attention in Fulton County and elsewhere has
been on pathogenic hazards by direct and indirect routes and toxic
substance hazards by indirect routes only.  It is felt that the
direct route has been unduly neglected.  The ensuing calculations
show that airborne spray may also impose toxic risks.

     Analysis of the sludge applied in pulton  County is  presented
in Table VIII-7.  Multiplying the sludge respiratory intake by
the appropriate concentration of a substance gives  the estimated
respiratory intake of that substance.
                      VIII-13

-------
           Table  VIII-7.   Analysis of Liquid Sludge  (ppm dry wt)
  Date
Total Solids (%)
Cd
Concentrations (mg/1)
 Cr      Cu    Pb       Hg
wt. basis)
            Table VIII-8.   Calculated Respiratory Intake (ug)
Zn
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Avg.
Avg.
1
1
1

1

(
974
974
974
1974
974

ppm, drj
4
4
4
3
4
4
/
.10
.16
.24
.88
.23
.12
—
8.
11.
13.
11.
13.
11.
289
8
9
5
4
8
9

104
154
131
110
125
125
3040
59.7
71.3
75.9
60.6
69.5
67.4
1640
32
37
37
31
27
33
800
173
226
203
197
141
188
4570
125
168
168
150
166
155
3770
Metal *
Cd
[70 Ug]

Cr


Cu


Pb .
[430 ug]

Hg
[43 ug]

Zn


Receptor distance (m)
256
656
1156
256
656
1156
256
656
1156
256
656
1156
256
656
1156
256
656
1156
Stability B
(5 m/sec)
9.2
2.7
1.0
97
28
11
52
15
6
26
7
3
146
42
16
121
35
14
Stability D
(1 m/sec)
121
55
32
1277
578
334
689
312
181
336
152
88
1919
868
503
1584
716
415
           Bracketed  numerals  represent WHO recommended maximum daily  intake
                                VIII-14

-------
     In comparing the calculated estimates of respiratory intake
with WHO-recommended maximum daily intakes, it must be remem-
bered that the WHO figures are for continued daily intake.  The
figures for cadmium (Cd), for example, show intakes under "worst
case" conditions which are similar to the WHO limit, but subjects
are unlikely to be exposed to spray for more than a few days per
year.  A possible exception is the .operators  who might experience
a substantial aggregate of exposure if they work consecutively in
many fields.  The figures for mercury (Hg), in particular, suggest
that significant doses could be received.  It may be supposed, how-
ever, that protracted exposure downwind is unlikely to occur.

     Calculations such as these made for pathogens instead of
heavy metals would have to account for the proportion of bac-
teria or virus particles that remain infectious after spraying
and downwind travel.  This amount could be very large and would
vary tremendously under different environmental conditions.
Furthermore, airborne survival is quite unpredictable except
for highly robust species.
                       VIII-15

-------
B.    POTENTIAL DIRECT HEALTH HAZARD OF AIRBORNE PATHOGENS  AND  TOXIC SUBSTANCES

     The purposes in this section are to review the  likelihood of airborne
survival of pathogens and their dose effects,  handicaps  due to data short-
comings, and implications of air contamination for human and animal health
based on studies in the literature.

     1.    Areas of Variability and Uncertainty

          The nature and concentration of pathogens  in the sludge is an ex-
     tremely variable and uncertain area.  Well water, streamwater, and soil
     sampling programs do not serve as useful  indicators of pathogen con-
     centrations in the sludge at the time of  irrigation,  because surface
     exposure and percolation through the soil are extremely effective cleans-
     ing processes.  Pathogen die-off during sludge storage in the holding
     basins in another important variable, depending on  storage time.

          a.   Airborne pathogen survival - The second area of variation is
          in airborne survival.  Most microorganisms, especially pathogens,
          lose viability when sprayed, mainly  because of the "drying"  process
          of equilibration with the atmosphere, and sensitive  organisms may
          be sterilized.  However, there are some which  are not affected and
          continue to survive indefinitely in  the dark;  spores of Bacillus
          anthracis are an example.  The rate  of decay is influenced by tem-
          perature and humidity, being accelerated by higher temperature and
          responding variably to humidity.  For example, the polio virus sur-
          vives best at high humidity, and vaccinia, influenza and Venezuelan
          equine encephalomyelitis viruses at  low humidity (Harper, 1961).
          The survival of vegetative bacteria  five munutes after spraying
          demonstrate the variability experienced with different humidities
          and bacterial species (see following Table VIII-9).
                                VIII-16

-------
      Table VIII-9.   Five-Minute Survival (%) at
                      Different Humidities (Morton, 1962)
                                    Relative Humidity
                                85-87%       50%       20%
         Brucella suis           91          78
         Bact. tularense         42          26        1.9
These experiments were performed at 45° to 54°F in the dark;
higher temperatures show similar effects, and sunlight is extremely
destructive for bacteria and viruses.  Responses to temperature,
humidity and light are strongly modified by substances accompany-
ing the microorganism in the airborne particle, but this effect is
unpredictable.  Other material in a sludge aerosol will probably
favor pathogen survival, but laboratory or field data for aerosols
formed elsewhere from different aqueous media cannot be applied to
Fulton County with confidence.

b.   Receptor dose effect - A third area of uncertainty is  dose-
effect relations.   The number of inhaled organisms required for
infection of humans is very difficult to determine.   Similar in-
formation concerning toxic substances is more readily available
because animal experiments in that area can be extrapolated more
reliably.  Quantitative estimates of accidental human exposure to
toxic substances are easier to make, and direct human experimen-
tation with low doses is often acceptable.  In contrast, species-
to-species extrapolation is far less reliable for pathogens, quan-
titative evidence is seldom available for accidental infections,
and human experiment is usually barred.  There are a few sound data
concerning human infection by the respiratory mite, such as for
Q fever and tularemia, but no data are available concerning likely
pathogenic hazards of sewage sludge.  A further complication is
that operators and local inhabitants, those most at risk, may be sub-
                         VIII-17

-------
     ject to repeated exposures of subinfective live pathogens or large
     numbers of dead pathogens.  Such exposures are recognized ways
     for building immunity and might affect the sensitivity of the local
     population.

2.   Absence of Appropriate Data

     There are several reasons why the pathogenic hazard is very diffi-
cult to predict:

     •    Occasional samples taken may be quite unrepresentative
     •    Pathogen content of the sludge as sprayed is unknown
     •    If pathogen content were known, airborne survival would
          be quite unpredictable
     •    If air samples were available for estimating the respira
          tory intake, the effect on exposed humans could not be
          predicted.

     Any evaluation of direct health hazards at Fulton County must
therefore be a matter of judgment based on indirect evidence.   An ob-
jective evaluation would be possible if certain observations  were made,
On the other hand, if spray operations are drastically reduced as pre-
sently planned, there is little need for such observations,

     The direct evidence concerning the sludge as sprayed does not of-
fer more than a broad estimate of chemical  composition and an indica-
tion, based on lagoon sampling, of a bacterial  content that is much
lower than that of freshly digested sludge.   Environmental  sampling  of
well water, streamwater, soil, and crops helps to measure hazards, but
tells little about the sludge as  applied,  because of the strongly modi-
fying effects of  exposure and percolation.   No air samples have been
taken to determine biological or chemical  composition  of the  aerosols.
This study is thereby deprived of the knowledge of what is present and
of what quantity.  The first might be surmised if thorough sludge analy-
ses (as sprayed)  were available,  though with considerable uncertainty
about labile microorganisms.   The second could be estimated for stable
chemical constituents only.
                             VIII-13

-------
3.   Human Health Implications from Indirect Evidence

     The most useful indirect information concerning the Fulton County
project is the absence of reported health effects.  As this situation
continues, the probability of serious trouble clearly diminishes.  How-
ever, future high levels of pathogens or toxic substances in the sprayed
sludge could result from a severe epidemic, changed industrial  pro-
cesses, defective treatment plant operation, or abbreviated sludge hold-
ing time.  Lack of evidence concerning health effects is apparently
based on absence of conspicuous ill effects rather than an active medi-
cal search for indicators.  For example, serological evidence of immune
levels might point to subinfective exposure, medical records might show
abnormal incidence of respiratory disease in the vicinity, or occupational
health records might reveal cases where exposure at home had tipped the
balance of response by augmenting occupational exposure to an industrial
chemical.

     Despite these reservations, the missing evidence is encouraging
and correlates with experience elsewhere (Viraraghavan, 1973; Sorber,
1973; Benarde, 1973; Krishnaswami, 1971; Dixon and McCabe, 1964;
Anders, 1954; Browning and Gannon, 1963; Ledbetter  et al., 1973; Illi-
nois Advisory Committee, 1975).  Note, however, that the evidence in-
dicates the level of risk to be low rather than nonexistent.

     There is no doubt that the influent wastes at treatment plants
contain a wide range of pathogens (see, e.g., Viraraghavan, 1971;
McCoy, 1971) that are not totally destroyed by treatment, including
chlorination (Sorber, 1973; Kruze  et al., 1960).  Although holding
the sludge further reduces pathogens, there is no evidence that it
eliminates them entirely, and toxic metals and other chemicals  may re-
main in sludge in significant concentrations.  Also, there is evidence
that operations which release small droplets do generate bacterial
aerosols at treatment plants (Kenline and Scarpino, 1972; Adams and
Spendlove, 1970; Napolitano and Rowe, 1966; Albrecht, 1958; Randall
and Ledbetter, 1966).  There is, therefore, reason to believe that
                           VIII-19

-------
pathogens might exist in the sludge as sprayed and that toxic sub-
stances certainly do, and spraying will  definitely result in downwind
aerosol transport of sludge constituents.

     Another possible mode of transmission that could affect both man
and animals is by insect vector.   Any irrigation operation resulting
in standing water containing pathogen-contaminated sludge presents a
potential hazard (Sorber, 1973).   There are no data to support an eval-
uation of this risk for Fulton County, but it may be surmised that the
risk is small or negligible.  The initial  concentration of any pathogen
would not be high and would be likely to decay rapidly in exposed shal-
low water.  In addition, the stagnant water is unlikely to remain for
long periods of time, so the chances of infecting vectors are low.

4.   Animal Health Implications

     Domestic and wild animals are also subject to airborne exposure,
and waste reaching treatment plants may contain a wide range of patho-
gens and parasites capable of affecting animals exclusively.  However,
there is another route for transmission of biological and chemical
agents which may be directly transmitted through ingestion of fodder
plants coated with sludge spray.   (This is explored in Chapter IX.)
                           VIII-20

-------
C.    MEASURES TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE DIRECT HEALTH HAZARDS

     Recommendations are of two types:  actions which would support a more
thorough evaluation of the hazards, and actions which can be taken to reduce
known or suspected hazards.

     1.    Improved Evaluation of Hazards

          Literature on epidemiology of sludge spray irrigation and similar
     operations should be more thoroughly reviewed.  Useful evidence may be
     found, especially in foreign journals.  Further evidence from wastewater
     treatment plants is not needed.  Public health records should be analy-
     zed and data collected on industrial discharges to provide a better
     identification of the original inputs into the wastewater system.  This
     information should be examined for correlation with the sludge analyses
      to guide future controlling actions in the event of increased pathogen
     or toxic substance loads.

          Biological and chemical analysis of sludge as sprayed should be
     conducted.  Air sampling should be performed downwind of the spraying
     operation, concurrently with the foregoing sludge analysis.  Conditions
     favoring a risk should be selected:  low temperature, stable atmosphere,
     light wind, overcast day.  Although less important than on-site sludge
     analysis, biological and chemical analysis of sludge leaving the treat-
     ment plants would provide baseline information concerning the input to
     the on-site storage and spraying operations, and supply better knowledge
     of the hazards attendant on short-circuiting the holding stage.

     2.    Reduction of Known or Suspected Hazards

          The following measures are recommended for preventing or ameliora-
     ting hazards to human and animal health:

          •    Entirely eliminate sludge spraying in favor of soil incorpora-
               tion and spreading techniques.  This would eliminate the aero-
               sol hazard.
                                VIII-21

-------
a    Minimize wind drift by designing spray equipment for low
     spray nozzle velocity and discharge near the ground.  Oper-
     ate in moderate to low wind with high turbulence to favor
     dispersion.

t    Reduce downwind survival  of pathogens by operating in con-
     ditions favoring viable decay:   low windspeed,  warm tempera-
     ture, daylight.   Avoid stable,  cool  air in  overcast or dark.

•    Minimize pathogen content at the time of spraying by longer
     retention in sludge lagoons and Fulton County holding basins,
     Watch for local  peak hazards by public health liaison and
     monitoring of pathogens and toxic substances at the treat-
     ment plants, increasing holding time if necessary.  Ensure
     that holding procedures cannot  be short-circuited.

•    Confine sludge sources to non-industrial  sewage or pre-
     treated industrial  wastewater in order to minimize toxic
     heavy metals.
                     VIII-22

-------
                              BIBLlOGkAPHY
Adams, A. P. and J. C. Spendlove, "Coliform Aerosols Emitted by Sewage
Treatment Plants," Science, V. 169, 1970.

Albrecht, C. R., "Bacterial Air Pollution  Associated with the Sewage
Treatment Process," University of Florida  (M.S.  thesis), 1958.

Allen, L. A., et al., "Effect of Treatment at the Sewage Works  on the
Numbers and Types of Bacteria in Sewage,"  Journal of Hyg.,  V. 47, 1949.

Anders, W., "The Berlin Sewer Workers," Zeitsch  f. Hyg.. V. 1,  1954.

Benarde, M. A., "Land Disposal and Sewage  Effluent:  Appraisal  of Health
Effects of Pathogenic Organisms," Journal  of AWWA. V. 65, No. 6, 1973.

Browning, G. E. and J. J. Gannon, "Operator Protection in Wastewater
Treatment Plants," Journal Water Pollution Control Federation.  V. 35, 1963.

D'ltri, F. M., et al., "An Overview of Four Selected Facilities That Apply
Municipal Wastewater to the Land," EPA Technology Transfer  Program (undated),

Dixon, F. R. and L. J. McCabe, "Health Aspects of Wastewater Treatment,"
Journal Water Pollution Control Federation. V. 36, No. 8, 1964.

Druett, H. A., et al., Studies on respiratory infection:  "The  Influence
of Particle Size on Respiratory Infection  With Anthrax Spores," Journal
Hyg.. V. 51, No. 31,  1953.

Greenberg, A. E. and B. H. Dean, "The Beef Tapeworm, Measly Beef, and
Sewage --a Review,"  Sew. Ind. Wastes. V.  30, 1958.

Harper, G. J., "Airborne Microorganisms:  Survival Tests with Four Viruses,"
Journal of Hyg.. V. 59, 1961.

Harper, G. J. and J.  D. Morton, "The Respiratory Retention  of Bacterial
Aerosols:  Experiments with Radioactive Spores," Journal of Hyg., V. 51,
No. 3, 1953.

Illinois Advisory Committee on Sludge and  Wastewater Utilization on Agri-
cultural Land, report on work conducted March 1974-January  1975, Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, February  1975.

Kenline, P. A. and P. V. Scarpino, "Bacterial Air Pollution from Sewage
Treatment Plants," Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Journal, V. 33, No. 5,  1972.

Krishnaswami, S. K.,  "Health Aspects of Land Disposal of Municipal Waste-
water Effluents," Journal Public Health. V. 62,  1971.

Kruze, C., et al., "Halogen Action on Bacteria,  Viruses and Protozoa,"
specialty conference on disinfection, University of Massachusetts, July
1970.
                              VIII-23

-------
Ledbetter, J.  0., et al.,  "Health Hazards  from Wastewater  Treatment  Prac-
tices," Environ.  Letters,  V.  4,  No.  3,  1973.

McCoy, J. H.,  "Sewage Pollution  of Natural  Waters,"  Microbial  Aspects  of
Pollution, Academic Press:  London and  New York,  1971.

Morton, J. D., "Survival  of Microbial Aerosols:   Experimental  Observations
and Calculations," Journal of Hyg.,  V.  60,  1962.

Napolitano, P. J., and D.  R.  Rowe, "Microbial  Content of Air  Near Sewage
Treatment Plants," Water and Sewage Works,  December  1966.

Randall, C. W. and J. 0.  Ledbetter,  "Bacterial  Air Pollution  from Activated
Sludge Units," Am. Ind.  Hyg.  Association Journal, V.  27, 1966.

Rudolfs, W., et al., Literature  review  of the  occurrence and  survival  of
enteric, pathogenic, and relative organisms in soil,  water, sewage,  and
sludge, and on vegetation:  "Bacterial  and Virus  Diseases," Sew.  Ind.
Wastes. V. 22, 1950.

Rudolfs, W., et al., Literature  review  of the  occurrence and  survival  of
enteric, pathogenic, and relative organisms in soil,  water, sewage,  and
sludge, and on vegetation:  "Animal  Parasites,"  Sew.  Ind.  Wastes, V.  22,
1950.

Sorber, C. A., "Protection of the Public Health," symposium on land  disposal
of municipal effluents and sludges,  Rutgers University - The  State University,
March 1973.

Thome, M. D., et al., "Utilization of  Sewage  Sludge on Agricultural  Land,"
Illinois Cooperative Extension Service, SM-29, April  1975.

Turner, D. B., Workbook of Atmospheric  Dispersion Estimates,  PHS  Publica-
tion 999-AP-26, NAPCA, 1969.

Viraraghavan,  T., "Occupationally Related Health  Hazards in Wastewater
Treatment Systems," Water Pollution Control Federation Highlights, V.  10,
1973.

Webb, S. J., Factors affecting the viability of airborne bacteria:  "Bac-
teria Aerosolized from Distilled Water," Can.  Journal Microbiol.  V.  5,
1959.

Webb, S. J., Factors affecting the viability of airborne bacteria:  "The
Effect of Chemical Additives on  the Behavior of Airborne Cells,"  Can.
Journal Microbiol. V. 6> 1960.

Webb, S. J., Factors affecting the viability of airborne bacteria: "The
Role of Bonded Water and Protein Structure in  the Death of Airborne  Cells,"
Can. Journal Microbiol, V. 6, 1960.
                              VIII-24

-------
                IX.   INDIRECT HEALTH EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT

     This chapter examines the potential indirect health effects of the pro-
ject, such as those caused by the consumption of vegetables or meats contami-
nated by pathogens or heavy metals in sludge.  The chapter begins with a dis-
cussion of theoretical considerations such as the interaction between sewage
sludge and soil, and identifies potentially hazardous constituents.  The
potential for biomagnification of toxic substances in the food chain is
then discussed in detail, beginning with an assessment of the accumulation
of toxic substances in soil, and proceeding to each trophic level until hu-
man health implications are addressed.  The chapter concludes with sugges-
tions of measures to prevent or mitigate indirect health effects.

A.   THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ASSESSING INDIRECT HEALTH EFFECTS

     Sludge applied to land has a variety of effects upon the soil.  The
first part of this section discusses the types of interactions that occur
between sewage sludge and soil, and the second part examines the behavior
of nutrients and trace elements in the soil.

     1.   Sewage Sludge and Soil Interaction

          An overview of the sources of interaction of sludge components
     in the food chain is depicted in Figure IX-1.  Sewage sludge under-
     goes many types of reactions after being incorporated into soil.
     These general reactions are illustrated in Figure IX-2.  Reaction
     rates and conditions are governed by soil type, cover crop, and en-
     vironmental characteristics such as temperature, ion exchange capa-
     city, organic matter, soil organism loading, and so forth.  Some
     interactions are known, but most are only guessed at.  There are  no
     models available which can be used to make predictions about the
     effects of sludge on various soil and plant components or characteris-
     tics.  This section first identifies the variables affecting these in-
     teractions and then examines the effects of sewage sludge on soil
     structure, erosion, and the soil atmosphere.
                                     IX-1

-------


Soil i
Organisms ^ 	 . s<
|
i
F
C








r
"ood
,rops

1
1
Soil


r
ill ^



i ,
1
Runoff
HoO \ / H90
\ /2
Fish

and Marine
1

<
	 Ce



I
Slu
1
dge
r



Foraaes Foliaae

rec
Eggs






> i






r









By-products of

il
-
' !

r
Milk Meat Breed in






1






\
Animals





L Human ^»
""Food
,



g
I 	








	 1



Forest and ^ 	
Range
So
Or




Ga



il
ganisms









me





    above processes
Figure IX-1.   Sources of Interaction  of Sludge  Components  in the Food Chain
              (Enviro Control,  Inc.,  1976)
                                 IX-2

-------
         Sludge
Soil
Atmosphere
Organic
Matter   
-------
a.   Factors in sludge and soil  interaction - Soil  type is the
primary factor in determining the effects of sludge on soil.   The
texture of the original soil  from the strip-mined land ranged from
loam to clay loam.  During stripmining, the overburden, including
loess, glacial drift, limestone and shale, was mixed as spoil.
This material was further mixed by subsequent leveling and grading
as part of land reclamation.   Efforts were made to minimize damage
during reclamation by leveling and burying ridges of shale, lime-
stone and claystone.

     Chemical and physical sludge properties are also of prime im-
portance in determining effects upon the soil.  Depending upon the
season, treatment plant output, shipping schedule, and other con-
straints, the sludge shipped to Fulton County may be fresh from
digestion or it may have been mixed at variable concentrations with
high-solids sludge from storage lagoons.  Sludge may have been
stored for up to 20 years in these lagoons.  Physical
and chemical properties of the sludge as shipped are shown in
Table VII-3 (page VII-10).  In the past,  because of Fulton
County facility constraints,  barged sludge may have been
pumped into,  and supernatant effluent pumped out of, the
same storage basin concurrently.  This should not occur under
current operating procedures as separate storage lagoons are planned
to be used.  This will result in a minimum storage time of six months.

     Effects of sludge upon soil are determined to a great extent
by application rates.  Sludge application to strip-mined land is
authorized on a sliding rate scale of 75 dry tons per acre for the
first year-, and 25 tons per acre for the following years.  Because
sludge application rates must be modified according to climatic and
cropping conditions, maximum spreading rates are seldom reached.
For the coming year, sludge will be incorporated at a maximum rate
of 25 dry tons per acre in five to six applications to non-cropped
land.  Cropped land will  receive approximately half that amount in
three applications  (two pre-planting and one post-harvest).  Sludge
                      IX-4

-------
application rates and their effect on a specific soil type must
be studied under actual conditions, because inadequate data exists
to accurately predict effects.

b.   Effects upon soil structure, erosion, and the soil atmosphere -
Sludge application has physical as well as chemical effects on soils.
These physical effects are mainly the result of the high content of
organic matter in sludge, which directly influences soil structure
and indirectly influences other soil properties, such as aeration.
The interactions between sludge and physical soil characteristics
are so numerous as to preclude an overall analysis.  Hence, effects
are evaluated in terms of soil aggregation, infiltration rates, soil
aeration, and others.
     Organic matter improves soil properties by providing a matrix
for ionic loading and water adsorption.  This increased nutritive
capacity results in increased productivity.  In fine textured soils,
sludge organic matter provides a matrix for the formation of a sta-
ble structure.  Figure  IX-3 below shows the effect of sludge on sta-
ble aggregate formation.  The influence of organic matter on aggrega-
tion probably reflects  a combination of both direct and indirect
effects.  The indirect  effects are observed through the influence of
soil organisms upon soil aggregation, particularly fungi, actino-
mycetes, and bacteria (Hubbell and Staten, 1951).
                     40
 o:
 CD
                  m 20
                  UJ
                  C_3
                  UJ
                  Q-
                             Soil With  5% of
                             Digested Sludge
                             Soil
   Figure  IX-3.
Effect of Sewage Sludge on Stable Ag-
gregates (Hubbell and Staten, 1951)
                         IX-5

-------
     Increased aggregate stability results in increased infiltration
and permeability rates,  increased aeration porosity, and decreased
bulk density.   These properties,  in turn,  influence soil  erosion
potential, the soil  atmosphere,  and the types of reactions occurr-
ing in the soil.  Erosion potential decreases with increased water
infiltration rates and stabilization of soil  particles, with a re-
sulting decrease in  dislodgement  and filtration.   In addition, a
surface layer of organic matter  reduces the energy of raindrop or
spray droplet impact.   Reduced erosion  may be among the most posi-
tive benefits derived from sludge application.

     The soil  atmosphere is affected by sludge application, pri-
marily through the effect or organic matter on microbiological popu-
lations (Wakeman, 1932).  The soil  atmosphere controls the types
of reactions occurring within the soil.  Anaerobic conditions favor
denitrification while aerobic conditions favor nitrification.
Ethylene gas, methane and carbon  dioxide may accumulate in soil  un-
der anaerobic conditions (Russell,  1961).   This,  in turn, affects
the uptake of water  and nutrients by plants.   For example, potas-
sium uptake is reduced under high carbon dioxide  conditions.  The
uptake of Ca, Fe, Mg, and Ni are  affected  to a lesser degree.  Ef-
fects on other elements have not  been extensively examined.  Sludge
application also affects gaseous  diffusion, which is directly re-
lated to soil  porosity (Erickson, 1973), as well  as soil  heat up-
take and water evaporation.  It  should  also be noted that sludges
with high sodium concentrations  may have a deleterious effect upon
structured soils through a dispersion effect, as  well as creating
conditions for potential salt toxicity.

     The organic matter in the soil of  Fulton County strip-mined
land begins at an extremely low  level and  increases on a  long-term
basis until it reaches a steady  state equilibrium.   The mainte-
nance level of sludge application (25 dry  tons  per acre per year)
provides maximum nitrogen utilization by crops, and should sup-
ply sufficient organic matter for further  improvement of  soil
structure, although  possibly at an  artificial  level.   If  sludge
                        IX-6

-------
     were not added after equilibrium was reached, the residual soil
     organic matter would presumably decompose and decrease on a log
     scale until a new equilibrium, consistent with agronomic practices,
     was reached.  Probably some soil structure would be lost (Peerlkamp,
     1950).  If the land lay fallow, organic matter may decrease to near
     the original level as bacterial populations are altered.  This could
     have a dramatic effect upon mineral availability, because most trace
     minerals in the soil are absorbed onto or chelated by soil-organic
     matrices.

          The above change, coupled with a concurrent decrease in soil
     pH, loss of buffering capacity and basic elements, and alteration
     of conic complexes, could drastically increase the availability of
     trace elements.  This is a primary cause for scientific concern
     about indiscriminate application of sewage sludge to land.   Data
     does not exist to confirm or refute this hypothesis.

          If soil erosion occurs in the future, environmental impacts
     from sludge application could be severe.  Estimates of normal  yearly
                                                               2
     soil loss range up to 1.5 tons per acre (or 10,000 tons/mi  ).   Losses
     of 30 tons per acre have been recorded on specific small watersheds
     (Bondurant, 1970).  Since erosion of farmland occurs mainly on the
     surface zone, which is analogous to the area of mineral accumulation,
     soil erosion may remove sizable quantities of trace metals  from land
     applied with sludge.  Runoff and soil  erosion have also directly cor-
     related with herbicide application.  Herbicides are used extensively
     on reclaimed land to control severe weed infestation (Hall, 1975,
     personal communication).  Catch basins and soil  conservation prac-
     tices presently control this problem,  but future problems may  oc-
     cur.

2.    Behavior of Nutrients and Trace Elements in Soil
     Nutrients can be classified as soluble,  intermediately soluble, or
relatively inert.   Water from sludge and rainfall  carries soluble con-
                             IX-7

-------
stituents while percolating through soil  drainage channels.   These con-
stituents consist mainly of Na+,  K+, NH^"1",  Ca+2,  Mg+2,  Cl",  S04"2, N03"2.
HCO-~ and H_BO^, all  of which can cause potential problems.   The effect
   %J       *J  %J
of sodium on soil structures was  cited earlier.   With either high rain-
fall and/or irrigation, these solids may leach,  resulting in pollution
of the water table (Richards, 1954).

     Soluble cations  are capable  of exchanging with others where the
rate is governed by ionic activity.  The major cations  of high solu-
                          +2   +2    +   +                          +3
bility and activity are Ca  , Mg   , Na , K ,  and, in acidic  soils, Al
and H .  A partial list of ions classified as having intermediate solu-
bility includes ionic forms of As, Cd, Co,  Cu, Hg, Mo,  Ni, P, Pb, and
Se.  Although considerable work has been done with these elements, much
is unknown about their specific solubility, precipitation processes
and interactions.  A third group  of ions form relatively inert compon-
ents in soils, and are not generally influenced  by soil-plant interre-
lationships.  This group inc
which form insoluble oxides.
lationships.   This group includes  ions  such  as  Cr   ,  Fe   ,  and  Mn
     Accumulation of nutrients  and minerals  in  the  soil  is  an  inevitable
result of disposing sludge on the land.   As  a  rule,  plants  do  not  accumu-
late large quantities of soil elements  other than nitrogen,  phosphorus
and potassium, and the actual quantity  removed  permanently  from the  soil
by commercially salable products is small  even  for  these.   Chemical
analyses of soil  for total and available  nutrients  after sludge appli-
cation were unavailable at the time of  this  writing.   By examining soil
composition prior to land leveling or after  leveling,  after initial
high-level sludge application,  and with succeeding  sludge application
rates, the effects of sludge application  as  a  function of total  and
available elements could readily be evaluated.

     This section discusses the relationship between total  and avail-
able nutrient concentrations in the soil,  and  then  identifies  elements
of potential or minimal hazard.
                             IX-8

-------
a.   Total and available soil concentrations - The important concept
in evaluating the effects of sludge application is not the loading
rate of an element per se, but the availability of the element in
the soil matrix.  After sludge is applied, precipitation and other
reactions affecting the activity of an element may take several
weeks or longer to reach equilibrium (Patterson, 1966; Webber, 1972;
Curry and Gigliotti, 1973; Lehman and Wilson, 1971; Leeper, 1973).
When evaluating the potential effects of an element, the oxidation
state, the presence of other ionic elements, chelating agents, and
the soil organic matrix must be considered.

     The availability of an element in the soil matrix can be ex-
perimentally estimated by periodically taking soil samples and per-
forming analyses using standardized procedures (Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1965).  The data de-
rived allow the determination of availability as a percent of a
total element present, which should roughly agree with the total
soil loading from sludge application after correcting for original
soil loads and crop removal.  If it does not, a loss through leach-
ing or some other process should be suspected.

b.   Heavy rnetals of potential hazard - Copper, nickel and zinc are
usually present in sludge in small quantities and in various insolu-
ble forms.  Solubility is directly related to pH (Lindsay, 1972).
The addition of these elements to the soil may actually be beneficial
as they are often deficient in foods for human consumption.  At very
high levels of availability, these elements can be toxic to plants
and animals.  Cadmium apparently behaves in a manner similar to cop-
per, nickel and zinc.  It may be the major problem in applying sludge
to Fulton County land because of its high concentration especially
in relation to the zinc content.   USDA recommendations and draft EPA
regulations would limit the Cd level in sludge to 1% of the Zn con-
tent.  The rationale for this proposal is that Zn plant toxicity would
                       IX-9

-------
occur and be noticed before Cd in the plant reached a level poten-
tially harmful  to human or animal health.   Others feel  that this
level of Cd is  too high and does  not provide an adequate safety
factor for routine unmonitored use.

     Chromium behaves similarly to other elements such  as zinc.
It is normally  found as Cr   in insoluble  hydroxides.  Low pH and
reducing conditions should increase  its  availability, perhaps re-
sulting in plant toxicity.  Proper management will  eliminate this
problem.  Lead  forms relatively insoluble  compounds in  soil, includ-
ing PbCCL, PbSO,, and Pb» (PCL)2  under normal  conditions.  Solu-
bility is probably directly related  to soil  pH and  redox potential.
Lead may present a problem, especially in  sludge originating from
treatment plants where urban storm runoff  and sanitary  sewage are
combined.

c."   Mineral elements of minimal  hazard  -  Nitrogen  is presently the
limiting element for sludge application  in Fulton County.  Soil
nitrogen is derived from organic  residue as  NH. , which is rapidly
oxidized to NCL~ by soil  bacteria.  Under  reducing  conditions,
NO,,  may be converted to NO ~, N2, and O.   The gases  NH0, N~ and
N-O may escape  from the soil as denitrification losses.  From 15 to
50% of sludge nitrogen may be lost in this manner.   Normally, soil
nitrogen is in  the anionic NO,," form and moves as a solution in
groundwater.  Nitrogen toxicity to plants  or groundwater pollution
can be eliminated by proper management.

     Phosphorus usually forms insoluble  complexes with  Al and Fe, or
at higher pH with C or Ca (Lindsay and Moreno, 1960).  Since phos-
phorus is a major constituent of  sludge, it may also become a limit-
ing element, especially after several years  of sludge application.
Phosphorus toxicity in soybeans has  been observed (University of
Illinois and MSDGC Department of Research and Development, 1975).
High levels of phosphorus may be  toxic per se, or may create nutrient
imbalances resulting in deficiencies of other elements  (Olsen, 1972).
                      IX-10

-------
The limiting factor for phosphorus uptake is Al, Ca, and Fe levels,
which usually exceed needs.   The other aspect of the potential  phos-
phorus problem is the presence of detergent polyphosphates and  the
organic phosphates used in insecticides and herbicides.

     Calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium are usually major soil
constituents and generally present no problem unless applied at ex-
tremely high levels.  Normal  leaching processes will remove these
elements by ionic exchange mechanisms, but their loss should not pose
a greater hazard than that associated with mine spoils.   Iron and man-
ganese occur in abundance in  natural  soils, normally in  the form of
insoluble hydroxides and oxides.  The addition of sludge should not,
therefore, cause any problems unless  the soil  is allowed to become
acidic.  Under these and reducing conditions,  the elements become
solubilized and may cause toxicity and pollution problems which can
also be controlled by management.  Sulfur exists as the  sulfur  anion
except under anaerobic reducing conditions.  It is known to play a
role in metal uptake by interacting with other elements.
                           IX-11

-------
B.   POTENTIAL INDIRECT HEALTH HAZARD OF BIOMAGNIFIED TOXIC SUBSTANCES

     This review of potential  indirect health effects resulting from sludge
application to strip-mined land is structured into several  sections.  First,
the accumulation of sludge components by soil and plants,  with an emphasis
upon corn, soybeans and grasses, will be evaluated.   The potential  accumula-
tion of sludge components in milk, beef, pork and chicken  will be discussed
second.  The next area of interest is the accumulation of  components by wild-
life or soil animals.  The former could be represented by  deer and
rabbits, and the latter by gophers and worms.  All  of the  above fac-
tors play a role in the evaluation of hazards to the last  group and major con-
cern of this study — humans.

     Assessment of problems is confounded not only by lack of data, but by
continued modification and alteration of sludge handling and disposal  proce-
dures.  For the coming years,  85% of the worked acreage is supposed to have
sludge incorporated into the soil by disking or plowing operations to a depth
of 8 to 10 inches.  Spraying will be utilized on 15% of the interior land in
four fields.  Two will be planted to alfalfa-brome mixture for winter pasture
and two to Sudax for summer pasture.  These fields will then be "field grazed"
by 87  head of beef cattle over the year.

     1.   Evidence of Accumulation in Soil
          This section presents evidence of accumulation of both heavy metals
     and organic compounds in the soil.

          a.   Concentrations of heavy metals - As a point of reference, 1968
          FWPCA water quality criteria for irrigation water were compared
          with the composition of sludge applied betweeen May 1974 and Octo-
          ber 1974, using the maximum monthly average application rate.  The
          ratios of sludge concentrations of Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, and In to the
          FWPCA limits for short-term irrigation of fine-textured soil reveal
          one outstanding difference:  Cd is 276 to 1 or about 16-fold greater
          than the next highest ratio, which  is for  zinc  (17 to  1).   This  indi-
           cates  tremendous cadmium  enrichment  relative  to  zinc.   Table  IX-1  on
           the  following  page  compares  typical  amounts per  acre of  soil  constitu-

                                IX-12

-------
              ents  with  amounts  added in  200 dry tons of sludge  (maximum annual
              rate  per acre).  Again, one dramatic difference is apparent.   The
              sludge-to-soil  ratio for cadmium is  1,400, which is 29 times
              greater than the next highest ratio, and 56 times  greater than
              the ratio  for zinc.   These  same calculations could be made for
              Fulton County soils  if sufficient data were available.

         Table IX-1.  Comparisons  of Normal Soil Constituents to a Sludge
                      Loading Rate of 200 Dry Tons per Acre (Bowen, 1966)
Element
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Mn
Hg
Ni
Zn
Amount in
Sludge (mg/kg)
350
4450
1800
1720
400
8
350
5000
Amount added
to Soil (kg/ac)
70
980
360
344
86
1.2
70
1000
Amount Present
in Soil (kg/ac)
Normal Range
0.01-0.6
4-2500
1-80
2-160
80-3500
0.01-0.25
80-800
8-250
Typical Level
0.05
80
16
8
700
0.025
30
40'
*
Sludge- to-
Soil Ratio
1400
11
22
43
0.01
48
2
25
*
  Ratio of amount in 200 dry tons of sludge to typical  soil level
                   Data published on the build-up of trace metals  in soils (see
              Tables IX-2 and IX-3) show discrepancies  between experimental  and
              theoretical findings.  In Table IX-2, accumulations  of extractable
              trace elements are shown for soil  treated with 76 tons of sludge
              over 12 years, indicating that contamination problems can develop.
              The analysis shows the sludge to be high  in copper and mercury,  but
              extremely low in cadmium.  The percent recovery is a reflection
              of element availability and shows  an increased mineral pool  avail-
              able to the plants, presumably originating from sludge.  This
              indicates that mineral reversion and binding may not be as exten-
              sive as many hypothesize.  The last column reflects  element appli-
              cation rate as a percent of control soil  and shows an extremely
              high loading rate of mercury.
                                     IX-13

-------
      Table  IX-2.    Changes  in the Concentrations of Extractable Trace  Elements
                    in Soil  Following Application of 76 Tons of Sewage  Sludge
                    Over a Period of 12 Years  (Anderson and Nilsson,  1972)
Element

Mn
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Cr
Pb
Cd
Hg
Mo
As
B
Se
Sludge

373
4,890
1,960
88
12.2
176
293
11.
12
7.4
6.6
30
7.3
Control
Soil

476
97.9
25.5
28.2
14.2
36.1
25.7
1.2
0.018
0.53
12.3
0.59
0.238
Treated
Soil
_ mn / \s n __
— iiiy/ Kg 	
480
368.8
90.5
43.3
14.6
61.0
43.9
1.7
0.675
0.68
12.5
0.76
0.569
Total Amount
Appl iedl

11.8
154
61.9
2.78
0.38
5.56
9.25
0.35
0.38
0.23
0.21
0.95
0.23
o
Recovery
( "/}
\i°)
98
146
104
140
100
146
125
no
170
Nv
XX89
100\
\
49 3
121
4
Application
("/}
\/o )
2
157
243
10
3
15
36
30
211
43
3
X 161
N<7
 Assuming the bulk density  of  the  soil was  1.33.   Except  for  boron,  percent  recov-
 ery is based upon concentrations  extracted with  2 M mineral  acids.
>
"Within the surfaci
 possibly erosion.

5F
4,
2
 Within the surface 20 cm of soil.   Losses  are  due  to  plant  removal,  leaching  and
 F
3
 Refers to recovery of water soluble boron.
 Amount applied as  a  percent of control  soil.
                                    IX-14

-------
         Table IX-3.     Element Analysis  of Sludge  and  Top  Six
                        Inches of Soil  (Hinesly  et  a!.,  1972}
                                 Total  Element
                                   in  Soil
                                              Extractable Element
                                                   in  Soil
Element
  Ca
  Fe
  Mg
  Mn
  K
  Na

  Zn
  Cu
  Pb
  Cr
  Ni
  Cd
 Sludge
 Application
 (mg/Kg soil)
   37    75
 1362
 2023
  397
   25
  175
   84

  285
   74
   63
  177
   18
   20
2747
4046
 794
  49
 351
 166

 570
 148
 126
 354
  36
  40
Sludge Application Rate
(tons/ac)
0
(mq/Kq
3,000 3
18,300 18
2,700 2
1,200 1
18,000 17
5,900 5
72
19
31
29
23
1.1
(0.1)*
37
soil)
,100
,000
,800
,400
,800
,900
163
34
44
61
25
5.1
(4.1
75

3,100
18,500
2,500
1,500
18,200
6,000
260
52
60
86
28
8.
)* (7.
Sludge Application Rate
(tons/ac)
0

1200
499
400
304
222
14
13
3.
6.
.
2.
5 0.
5)* (0.
37
(mg/Kg soil)
1200
792
413
428
229
27
98
9 19
6 17
9 11
3 5.3
2 3.8
02)* (3.6)*
75

1500
775
410
402
260
32
181
32
30
19
7.0
7.0
(6.8)*
  Hg
0.025   0.05
               0.04
0.15    0.27
     See comment in accompanying  text.
                                IX-15

-------
           Table IX-3 shows sludge, total  soil  and extractable  soil  con-
      centrations of  elements for the top  15  cm of soils on sludge-
      treated land.   Total  and extractable elements are increased for
      all of the trace elements reported.   Since there may have been an
      error in the determination of the Cd level in this experiment, a
      second line is  included, showing that total  Cd increases  seven-
      fold with a high background value, but  75-fold with a low back-
      ground value.   The same relationship is obtained for extractable
      Cd, with a 35-fold increase for a low background value.   Table
      IX-4, displayed below, presents the  data in a different  perspec-
      tive, where the extractable pool is  calculated as a percent of the
      total pool.  The percent recovery of trace elements in the sludge
      applied to the  soil is also shown, indicating that element loss is
      high.  Assuming that the techniques  are valid, element loss oc-
      curred through  plant uptake, leaching or soil erosion.
     Table  IX -4.   Recovery of Trace  Elements as a Function  of
                    Trace Elements Applied (Hinesly  etal.,  1972, 1974)
                         Sludge Application Rates (dry tons per acre)
Element       0_         37         75.               37                  75
            Element Availability (extractable
            element/total element)             Recovery in 0-15 cm depth*  Recovery in 0-15 cm depth*
            (X)         (%)        (%)              (*)                  (*)

                                                17                  15
                                                16                  13
                                                16                  19
                                                17                  19
                                                10                  11
                                                27                  35

*Assuming that all elements applied remain in the 0-15 cm layer.
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Ni
Zn
22
3
23
—
10
18
75
17
56
21
21
60
83
21
61
35
25
68
                              IX-16

-------
     In another study, trace element concentrations extracted from
soils treated with sewage sludge for 19 years were compared with sam-
ples from untreated control sites and from the sludge applied (see
Table IX-5).  Considering that application of sludge was discon-
tinued in 1961, the 1967 analyses indicate long-term availability
of these elements.  It is apparent that sludge loaded ele-
ments will be available for plant uptake for a considerable period
of time.  The soil onto which the sludge was applied had greater
than normal concentrations of Cu, Ni, and Zn.  The level of zinc in
these sludge-treated soils may be toxic to susceptable crops (Purves,
1972).

     To evaluate the Teachability of various elements from sludge-
treated mine spoils, laboratory soil columns with three sludge appli-
cation rates were leached for 100 days (see Table IX-6).  The ex-
tractable elements were determined at various depths after leaching.
Note that sludge incorporation was uniform.  It is interesting that
extractable quantities of each element vary with depth and sludge
loading rate.  This shows the difficulty in predicting the behavior
of any particular element under specific conditions.

     Table IX-7 records the concentrations of elements at two depths
with four sludge loading rates.  The data clearly show accumulations
of weak extractable elements with increasing sludge application rates
for both sampling depths.  It also shows that most elements are con-
centrated in the upper layer of soil.  Available cadmium and chro-
mium disclose the largest increases of 20 and 35 times background
levels, respectively, indicating the need for careful monitoring
under these conditions.  All trace elements need to be monitored
periodically for both total and extractable levels.  Particular
emphasis needs to be placed on Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, and Zn in
all cases, and others depending upon the composition of the sludge.
Much needs to be learned about the behavior of trace elements from
sludge when applied to soil.
                       IX-17

-------
Table IX-5.    Trace Elements Extracted by 0.5 N HOAc from Soils Treated
              with Sewage Sludge for 19 Years and the Sewage Sludge Ap-
              plied, and Compared with Normal Scottish Soils

                                                                  2
                             Concentration Extracted by 0.5 N HOAc
     Description	       Cr        Cu       Pb       Mi       Zn

                            	Hg/g	

Sewage Sludge Applied       3.5       20       3.2      50        800

Control:

  Sampled in 1959

  Sampled in 1967

Treated :

  Sampled in 1959

  Sampled in 1967
                      4
Normal Scottish Soils

  Low

  High



 From Le  Riche (1968).  Sewage was applied annually at an average rate of
 66.5 tons per year for 19 years.

2
 Results  are the mean from 2 plots.


 Treatments were discontinued after 1961.   In 1959 and 1967 the total  sludge
 was 1,260 and 1,393 m.  tons/ha, respectively.

4From Mitchell (1964).
0.3
0.9
2.8
2.6
0.01
1.0
5
15
20
58
0.05
1.0
1.2
1.6
5
4.2
0.2
4.0
4.2
4.4
18
8.1
0.1
5.0
88
83
395
275
2
30
                              IX-18

-------
 Table IX-6.    Concentrations of Various Trace Elements Extracted
               From Sludge-Amended Acid Spoil Mine Material (Peterson
               and Gschwind, 1973)

Treatment*
^ m i*nnc/hji^
\ III • LUMo/ flu )
Control
61



122



Spoil
Depth
(r+rn }
U\\)
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40

Cr

4.3
20
3.5
77
78
52
51
5.2
3.8
0.1 N HC1
Cu

14
33
5.5
126
127
80
67
7.1
6.4
Extractable
Mn
	 Hn/n 	
— ny/y 	
8.0
7.7
3.5
21
19
12
10
5.5
3.8

Zn

54
136
145
556
488
104
206
113
70
*Sewage sludge was incorporated uniformly to 2 kgm of spoil material
 rates indicated.
                             IX-19

-------
  Table IX- 7.   Concentrations of Trace Elements Extracted With
                0.1 N_ HC1 from Sludge-Amended Soils (Hinesly
                et al., 1972)
Application
   Rate
(m. tons/ha)
      0

     44

     88

    166
Concentration in Soil (Hg/g)
      0

     44

     88

    166
Cd

0
1
3
7

0
0
0
0

.2
.5
.8
.0

.6
.7
.8
.9
Cr

0.94
3.3
11
19

0.6
0.8
1.3
1.6
Cu

3.
8.
19
32

3.
4.
5.
6.

0-15
9
4


30-45
5
9
9
4
Pb
cm
6.
11
17
30
Mn
depth
6 304
306
428
402


2
3
5
7
Ni

.3
.5
.3
.0
Zn

13
41
98
181
cm depth
2.
2.
4.
5.
0 45
7 63
2 57
3 61
2
3
3
.6
.6
.6
3.6
7.8
12
16
18
                             IX-20

-------
     The use of sewage sludge in reclamation of strip-mined land
for agricultural purposes may be a significant hazard due to heavy
metal accumulations in food plants and animal produce.  The ele-
ments most likely to cause problems are As, Cd, Pb, and Se, with
Cd posing the greatest hazard considering the relative concentra-
tions in the applied sludge.  A complicating factor is high back-
ground levels of certain heavy metals in mine spoils.  University
of Illinois researchers pointed out that the black shale overlying
the coal seam had been considered a heavy metal mining resource
(Hinesly, 1975, personal communication).  Since it was interspersed
within the overburden, it may contribute significantly to the heavy
metal lead in soils.

b.   Concentrations of organic compounds - Relevant data could not
be located concerning the levels of organic compounds in sludge,
let alone the accumulation of these compounds in sludge-treated
soils.  One exception is humus-related material, which directly af-
fects water and mineral retention and is easily studied.  Accumu-
lation of humus is governed by its equilibrium with soil bacteria.
As more organic carbon is applied and more soil organisms are pre-
sent, more organic carbon is degraded.  However, quantitative infor-
mation on this process sufficient for reliable predictions is lack-
ing, as is information concerning the effects of arbitrarily halt-
ing sludge applications.  These data are necessary to predict the
hazard from trace metals once sludge application is discontinued.

     Another concern with organic compound accumulation which may
eclipse humus in importance is the build-up of organic contaminants
such as fats and oils, chlorinated hydrocarbons, herbicides, bio-
logically active metals such as methyl-mercury, and others.  Al-
though data was insufficient to assess potential effects of these
organic contaminants, such effects are known to exist in other-
cases.  Therefore, a potential hazard could be assumed to exist
in Fulton County.
                       IX-21

-------
2.   Evidence of Accumulation in Plants

     Since research has shown that total  and  available minerals  accumu-
late in sludge-treated soil,  the potential  for accumulation  and  concen-
tration of minerals in plants grown in such soil  must be assessed.   Ful-
ton County is in a prime agricultural region  where  the predominant  crops
are corn and soybeans.  These two crops will  therefore be analyzed  in
this section, along with grasses, which could serve as forage or ground
cover.

     Data presented in Table  IX-8 show typical  concentrations of trace
elements in soils as compared to levels in  plants.   Suggested toxic
levels  for "average" plant species are proposed (i.e., ignoring  accumu-
lator species).  The problem  with interpreting this data is  that there
is no way to predict availability and uptake  of elements.

     a.   Concentrations in corn plants - Analysis  of trace  element ac-
     cumulations in corn plants  and leaves  is given in Table IX-9 for
     four sludge application  levels.  The data reveal  definite accumu-
     lations of Cd and Zn in  corn leaves.   Mn and B also accumulate
     but to a lesser degree.   Zn and Cd levels in grain are  increased
     with increasing sludge application, whereas  Mn and N show no sig-
     nificant change at the sludge application rates used. Assuming
     that these Cd values may be in error,  accumulation of Cd would be
     even greater than is indicated.  The validity  of this assumption
     is supported by USDA research which  reports  the Cd level  for corn
     samples to be 0.035 to 0.148 with a mean of 0.055 + 0.043 mg/kg
     (Garcia  et al., 1974).   This data indicates that there is  a de-
     finite potential hazard  from mineral accumulation in corn grain
     and plants.

          From the available  data, cadmium  appears  to be the most po-
     tentially detrimental  element in grain.   If the corn plants were
     harvested as silage for  animal  consumption,  many elements could pre-
     sent problems.  In similar  laboratory  work,  Zn and Cr were  both
     found to be toxic to corn plants, but  at extremely high levels
     which would probably require long-term sludge  application (Mortvedt
     and Giodano, 1975).
                           IX-22

-------
         Table IX-8.   Concentrations of Trace Elements in
                       Soils and Plants (Allaway, 1968)
                    Concentration
                   in Soils Qug/g)
 Concentration
in Plants (jjg/g)
Element
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Pb
Mn
Mo
Ni
Se
V
Zn
Common
6
10
0.06
100
8
20
10
850
2
40
0.5
100
50
Range
0.1 -40
2 -100
0.01-7
5 -3,000
1 -40
2 -100
2 -200
100 -4,000
0.2 -5
10 -1,000
0.1 -2.0
20 -500
10 -300
Normal
0.1 -5
30 -75
0.2 -0.8
0.2 -1.0
0.05-0.5
4 -15
0.01-10
15 -100
1 -100
1
0.02-2.0
0.1 -10
15 -200
Toxic*
—
75
—
—
—
20
—
--
—
50
50-100
10
200
*Toxicities listed do not apply to certain accumulator plant species,
                             IX-23

-------
     Table IX-9.
Element


  Fe



  Mn

  In


  Na



  Cr



  Cu



  Pb



  Ni



  Zn



  Cd*
  Hg
   Content of Trace
  Sludge
Application
  (Kg/ac)
 1,639
 3,279
    20
    40
    77
   134
   143
   287
    60
   120
    51
   102
     14
     29
   231
   462
                     16
                     32
                      2
                      4
                      0.017
                      0.033
lements in Corn
Hinesly et al .
Corn Leaf
(mg/Kg)
107
101
111
81
92
116
96
in
94
4
5
4
9
10
9
7
7
6
3
3
4
58
138
212
3
5
12
26
35
44
0.03
0.03
0.04
Versus
, 1972)
Corn Grain
(mg/Kg)
100
95
106
18
11
18
146
99
232
0.3
0.3
0.4
5
5
6
0.03
0.04
0.03
2
3
3
89
127
152
0.3
0.8
1.0
7
5
7
0.005
0.005
0.004
*Baseline data may  be  erroneous by a factor of lOx.
                             IX-24

-------
b.   Concentrations in soybean plants - Application of sludge to soy-
beans has demonstrated that serious problems could develop.   When
sprayed on soybean fields, sludge accumulates on the leaves  and re-
sults in decreased photosynthesis.  The nitrogen-fixing bacteria liv-
ing symbiotically with legumes are eliminated.  In addition, soy-
beans are extremely susceptible to salt and phosphorus toxicity.
This was observed when 105 tons of MSDGC sludge were applied to
Blount silt loam.  The toxicity was reduced by leaching, which pre-
sumably reduced the soluble salt load in the soil  (Thome and
Hinesly, 1975).

     Soybean plants have been shown to accumulate Cd from sludge-
treated soils  (Jones  et al., 1973).  The addition of 87 metric
tons per hectare produced Cd levels in plants of 18.5jug/l as op-
posed to 1.8jug/l at the control plot.  Seeds showed a maximum
concentration of 1 jug/1.  Other work summarized in Table IX-10
also indicates that soybean grains can accumulate Cd and other
metals, including Cu and Zn. Presumably other elements can also be
concentrated in soybean seeds.

     In summary, trace element uptake has clearly been shown to
occur in corn and soybeans grown on sludge-treated land in Fulton
County or on similar land, as well as in laboratory and analogous
field studies.  Data are insufficient for predicting the long-term
effects of sludge application to land.  This indicates a need for
continuous evaluation and prompt reporting of results prior to the
release of any product for consumption by humans.

c.   Concentrations in grasses and other plants -  Data on grasses,
including wheat and rye, disclose a large variation in mineral
uptake.   Uptake is dependent upon the plant species and the  strain
within the species (Bingham et al., 1975; Dowdy and Larson,  1975).
Trace element uptake is a particular problem with  lettuce, because
lettuce  is an accumulator.   Uptake of Ni  by wheat  and Cu and Ni  by
                      IX-25

-------
         Table IX-10.    Analysis  of Soybeans  Versus  Total
                        and  Extractable  Soil  Elements
                        (Hinesly  et al.,  1971)

                                   0.1 NH4C1
                 Soybean          Extractable           Total
Element           Grain             (0-15  cm)            (0-15  cm)
                 (mg/kg)            (mg/kg)              (mg/kg)

  Na              481                  17                 8,200
                  591                  26                 7,800
                  507                  35                 7,500

  Zn              154                  13                    55
                  174                 154                   244
                  175                 301                   336

  Mn               79                 103                 1,600
                   89                 305                 1,300
                   93                 291                 1,300

  Cu   -            31                  5                    15
                   30                  51                    65
                   29                  75                    90

  Cd*               0.4                0.2                   1.7
                    0.9                8.5                   7.8
                    1.2                13.6                  12.3
*Baseline errors may have resulted in erroneous data.
                            IX-26

-------
      oats  is  shown  in  Tables  IX-11  and  IX-12.   As  with  other crops,
      soil  pH  and metal  levels  have  significant effects  upon  plant  mineral
      levels.   The same  types of  effects  are  shown  in  Table IX-13 for  B,
      Cu, Mn,  and Zn in  rye.   In  this  study,  Zn accumulated over 20 times
      more  than at the  centrol  plot  with  increasing sludge application
      rates.   The same  pattern  would probably be seen  for Cd  under  the
      same  conditions.

           English scientists find instances  of metal  toxicity to
      plants on a routine  basis on sludge-treated lands  (Patterson,
      1971).   However, many reports  of toxicity  involved sludge appli-
      cation far in  excess of that authorized for Fulton County.  Toxi-
      city  was  usually attributed to Zn and Ni.

           Tolerance levels have  been proposed  for  monitoring heavy me-
      tals  and are shown in Table IX-14.   In  lieu of any nationally ac-
      cepted values,  these figures appear to  be  reasonable as a starting
      point.   The ultimate use  of a  crop  (i.e.,  human  or animal consump-
      tion), subsequent dilution, and many other factors are  important in
      determining these values.

 3.    Evidence  of Accumulation  in Domestic Animals

      Two factors must be  considered when  examining  the potential for
 metals accumulation  in animals.  The first consideration is whether the
 level of ingestion  is sufficient to cause short or  long-term toxicity
 or  ill health  symptoms.   Secondly,  the question of  whether the biotrans-
 fer of elements  via  animal products is high  enough  to cause short  or long-
 term  toxicities  in  the consuming public must be considered.

     The primary foods  to  be  concerned about are milk, beef,  eggs and
pork or chicken.  The first  two commodities  come from  the class  of
animals known  as ruminants,  and the  latter two from monogastrics.

      a.    Toxicity with bioaccumulation - Little data is available con-
      cerning  types of metal  toxicity, as  animal scientists have been
      concerned with  supplying enough rather than too much of a particular
                            IX-27

-------
   Table  IX-11
 Effect of Ni Applied to Soils at Different pH Levels
 on the Ni Content of Spring Wheat (Patterson, 1971)
                              Concentration  of  Ni  in  Plants
Ni
Applied
(Hg/g soil)
0
5
10
20
40
80
160
Grown in Soil @ pH:
5.1
:
2.5
4.5
3.0
8.0
10.0
74.0
--
5.5
	 un
2.2
2.5
3.7
4.7
6.5
17.2
105.
6.5
Ni/g dry matter —
1.0
0.75
2.2
2.0
2.75
3.0
8.25
7.5

„
0.5
0.5
—
0.75
1.25
3.0

      Table IX- 12.  Copper and Nickel Concentrations in Oat Plants
                     as Influenced by Amount of Sewage sludge Applied
                     and Soil pH (Page,  1974 - condensed and modified
                     from Patterson,  1971)
Amt. Sludge
Applied
(m. tons/ha)

      0

     33

     67

    134
Concentration
Concentration in Plants (Hg/g)'
in Soil
Cu
—
14
28
56
(Hg/g)1
Ni
--
97
194
389
Cu
pH 5.3
11
12
12
19

pH 6.8
13
12
12
14
Ni
pH 5.3
8
90
120
210

pH 6.8
4
28
50
70
In-
 Disregarding amount present initially; concentrations in soil are based upon
 air dry weight.
 "Concentrations in plants are on a dry matter basis.
                                IX-28

-------
  Table IX-13.
Sludge Rate
(m. tons/ha)

      0
     42


     84


    121


    242
Trace Element Composition and Yield of Rye Clipoinqs
As Influenced by Sludge Ayplications to Soils (King
and Morris, 1972)'
 Treatment
  unlimed
  limed

  unlimed
  limed

  unlimed
  limed

  unlimed
  limed

  unlimed
  limed
Yield0
TkgTha)

2,000
2,120

1,180
1,570

1,540
1,960

1,650
2,090

  390
  900
                                                  Trace Element
                                                  Concentration3
B

5.0
6.2
5.0
6.2
8.8
6.8
6.5
7.5
8.8
6.5
Cu
	 Hn/n
	 ng/g
10.0
10.2
11.0
10.2
12.5
11.5
14.5
12.0
20.0
16.0
Mn

128
93
84
72
133
89
111
82
227
161
Zn

32
30
150
106
232
186
340
251
775
579
1
 All treated with NPK inorganic fertilizer at recommended  rates.


"Total applied on an oven dry weight (110°C)  basis  over  a  2-year period,


 Dry weight basis.
                               IX-29

-------
      Table IX- 14.   Probable Available Form,  Average  Composition
                     Range for Selected Agronomic  Crops,  and  Sug-
                     gested Tolerance Levels of Heavy  Metals  1n
                     Crops ( Melsted,  1973)

Barium
Cadmium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Lithium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Strontl urn
Z1nc

Arsenic
Boron
Chromium
Fluorine
Iodine
Molybdenum
Selenium
Vanadium
Probable
Available

Ba-H-
Cd-H-
Co++
CU-H-
Fe-H-
Pb-H-
L1++
Mn-H-
Hg-n-
N1-H-
Sr++
Zn++

As04
HB03
Cr04
F"
r
Mo04
Se04
V03
Common Average
Composition Range
(ppm)
Cations
10-100
0.05-0.20
0.01-0.03
3-40
20-300
0.1-5.0
0.2-1.0
15-150
0.0001-0.01
0.1-1.0
10-30
15-150
Anlons
0.01-1.0
7-75
0.1-0.5
1-5
0.1-0.5
0.2-1.0
0.05-2.0
0.1-1.0
Suggested
Tolerance Level*
(ppm)
200
3
5
150
750
10
5
300
0.04
3
50
300

2
150
2
10
1
3
3
2

*Average values for corn,  soybean,  alfalfa, red clover, wheat, oats, barley
 and grasses grown under normal  soil  conditions.  Greenhouse, both soil and
 solution, values omitted.
                                 IX-30

-------
element.  Table IX-15 deals with the appearance of toxic symptoms
in poultry and swine.  Research has shown that toxicities for most
compounds are usually in the same order of magnitude for various
animal species.  This is generally true for initial and lethal
effects and is accepted as preliminary evidence for between-species
testing.  Data also tends to be concerned with short-term (in the
order of weeks) rather than long-term (in the order of years and de-
cades) toxicity effects.  Presumably the long-term toxic level
would be considerably lower than that reported in Table IX-16.

     What little data exist indicate that bioaccumulation of most
trace elements does not occur in most types of livestock tissue.
Absorption of trace elements is influenced by body stores of the
element, the form in which the element occurs, efficiency of the
digestion process (i.e., separation and breakdown of element-
organic complexes), and the absorption rate.

     Absorption of trace elements is rather inefficient, the maxi-
mum amount absorbed being 0 to 25% of the element intake.  If an
animal is biologically able to excrete more of a particular element
per day than absorbed, no tissue build-up will occur unless the ex-
cretory process for that element is regulated by a metabolic mechan-
ism.  The liver and kidney may be exposed to high levels of trace
elements during the excretory process.  The bioaccumulation of
mineral elements is known to occur in the kidney and liver of do-
mestic animals.  For food-producing animals, disposal  of the kidney
and liver upon slaughter eliminates the potential problem from the
food chain.

     In any case, this type of accumulation makes it difficult to
estimate allowable animal intakes.  This, coupled with variability
in absorption due to nutrient intake and composition,  confounds the
problem even further.  The excretion of trace elements by domestic
animals via milk or eggs does not appear to be a problem according
to limited work using I.V.-administered radionuclides.
                       IX-31

-------
              Table IX-15.   Short-Term Toxicities of Elements in Feeds
Element
Al
Ba
Br
Cd
Cl
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
F
I
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Ni
Pb
Se
Ag
Na
Sr
V
Zn
NOs'2
N02"2
SO.
4
Form
A1C1 3
—
NaBr
CdS04
KC1
Cr2(S04)3

CuS04

NaF
K-
MgC03
MnS04
Hgso4
Na2Mo04
NiS04
Pb acetate
Se wheat
AgS04
Na2S04
SrC03
Na4V207
ZnO
NaN03
N02
CaSO,
4
Chicken (mg/kg)* Swine (mg/kg)*
500
—
5,000
25
15,000
300
5
324 300
5,000
500
625 800
6,000
4,800 4,000
400
200
500
500
10 5
200
8,900
6,000
10
3,000 2,000
900
400
25,000


*
 Lowest level  of which symptoms  occur (generally  decreased  growth  rate)
                                    IX-32

-------
b.   Toxicitywith direct ingestion - The second issue in heavy
metal intake by domestic animals is the direct ingestion of sew-
age sludge by grazing or forage-fed animals.  Preliminary data
(Chaney, 1975, personal communication) disclose a sludge content
of up to 18% of dry matter in field-harvested forage samples irri-
gated with sludge.  A single 13-inch rain reduces the proportion of
sludge in the harvested sample to 9%.  These data clearly indicate
that direct ingestion of sludge via the forage from sludge-irrigated
fields may pose a significant problem to animals.

     A sample calculation indicates the potential problem.  If
sludge containing 50 ppm at 4% solids is spread on land, and assum-
ing 10% of forage dry matter to be sludge, then Cu intake would be
125 ppm of the grazed forage.  Cu toxicity symptoms may appear at
20 ppm, depending upon the effects of other elements.  The intake
would be six times higher than the point where toxicity symptoms
may occur.  Another example might be Cr intake when forage contains
4% sludge on a dry matter basis.  Intake would exceed the 100 ppm
level considered toxic for animals, if the sludge contained 3,000
ppm on a dry matter basis.

     An analogous issue is the direct ingestion of dirt which con-
tains high levels of trace elements.  This could present a signi-
ficant hazard, especially to low grazers such as sheep and to rooters
such as swine.

     In summary, research indicates that bioaccumulation of heavy
elements from plants in animals tissues or in milk or eggs is a
minimal problem.  Accumulation in the liver or kidney may present
a problem under certain circumstances, such as when Cd levels in
feed plants and grains are high.  A significant trace element prob-
lem may exist for domestic animals by direct ingestion of sludge
via forage or soil.  The USDA and FDA have ongoing research programs
to assess the hazard level, but complete results will not be avail-
able for several years.
                        IX-33

-------
4.   Evidence of Accumulation  in Wildlife

     For the purposes of this  study,  wildlife  is  divided  into  two cate-
gories and discussed separately.   The first  category  consists  of micro-
organisms and microfauna inhabiting  the  soil;  the second  consists of
avian and mammalian species.

     a.   Soil microorganisms  and microfauna - Soil microorganisms are
     concentrated in the top 15  cm of soil.  Estimates  of microorganism
                                               7      9
     numbers per gram of soil  are:   bacteria,  10   to  10 ; actinomycetes,
     106 to 107; fungi,  105 to 106;  algae, 104 to 105;  and protozoa, 103
     to 10 .  Bacterial  biomass  is estimated to be approximately 2,800
     pounds per acre.  Actinomycetes, fungi  and a combination  of other
     soil groups each contribute an  equal amount  of biomass totalling
     15,000 pounds per acre.   Little is  known  about the biological  role
     of various soil organisms,  let  alone their in vitro  metabolic eccen-
     tricities and the effects of sludge application.   However,  one study
     showed significant  changes  in bacterial populations  and in  biochemi-
     cal and enzymatic activity  of the populations in sludge-treated land
     (Miller, 1973).

          Soil microanimals, which include neiratodes, earthworms,  flat-
     worms, snails, centipedes,  millipedes,  woodlice, arachnids, and
     insects in various  stages,  are  also affected by  sludge application.
     These animals probably play an  important  role in waste recycling
     on sludge-treated land (Burges  and  Row, 1967).   Recent research
     (Helnke, 1975, personal communication)  shows that  earthworms have
     a heavy metal uptake which  is directly  proportional  to contact time.
     Biomagnification is observed for Cd and Hg,  with Cd  accumulations 30-
     to 70-fold greater  than soil  concentrations. Research also indi-
     cates that earthworms are selective foragers for soil  organic matter.
     Research is underway to determine the effects of methyl mercury on
     earthworms.  Earlier work indicates that  earthworms  may accumulate
     lead.
                             IX-34

-------
     b.   Birds and mammals - Effects of sludge application on wild birds
     have not been investigated as far as can be determined.  Sludge ap-
     plication could result in increased food supply, habitat changes,
     changes in predatory activity, and so forth.  Potential effects due
     to bioaccumulation by the bird per se or from a diet of soil micro-
     animals could be significant.  An important consideration is that
     the access of wild birds to sludge-treated lands cannot be restric-
     ted or controlled.  An initial estimate of hazard may be made by
     correlating the hazard presented by heavy metal uptake to poultry.

          No references were found in which the potential effects on wild
     mammalian species were evaluated.  The considerations are the same
     as for avian species.  Domestic animals could be used as models for
     hazard assessment, but potential effects on wildlife will probably
     be more severe than on domestic animals because of the inability to
     manage the consumption patterns of wildlife.  Available research
     data indicates that a potential hazard does exist.

          As the Fulton County project increases in size over time and
     land use patterns are altered, there probably will be significant
     changes in wildlife species.  The first noticeable effect may be
     upon the growth and re-establishment of the Canada geese popula-
     tion, because these geese use the sink and pot holes endemic to non-
     reclaimed strip mine land for breeding.  Another problem is the
     tremendous potential for mosquito breeding with subsequent anthropod-
     borne disease transmission.  This potential problem was verified
     (Pariyek, et al., 1967) through avian hemcocytrozon parasite in-
     fections determined by blood smears.

5.   Human Health Implications

     Potential indirect human health hazards are extremely difficult to
assess.  This section first describes the problems associated with this
type of assessment, and then discusses the implications for human health
of agricultural, conservation, and community-related use of the land on
which sludge has been applied.
                            IX-35

-------
a.   Difficulties of assessing hazards to humans - Evaluation of
human health hazards resulting from mineral  consumption presents
five problems on which little research has been conducted.   First,
human susceptibility to specific mineral  toxicities varies  from per-
son to person.  This is genetically transmitted information which
may cover many mitigating factors.   Diet composition is a second
problem.  The variety of foods that is normally  consumed tends  to
dilute high levels of one particular food component.  The third
factor is the efficiency of digestion and absorption by humans eat-
ing contaminated foods.  This factor has genetic and dietary com-
ponents.  Fourth is the metabolic excretion and potential biotrans-
formation of a contaminant which is absorbed, and the question of
whether the metabolic half-life of the component is short (days) or
long (years).  Absorption and excretion factors control body loads
of any component.  The fifth factor is localization of a dietary
component in specific  organs  or tissues, which has the net effect
of multiplying existing body loads.

     The most likely suspects for potential  hazard are As,  Cd, Pb,
Hg, and Se.  A joint FAO-WHO committee has set provisional  limits
on intake of Cd, Pb and Hg, which are shown in the first part of
Table IX-16.  The second part shows the permissible average food
levels corrected for maximum water intake.  These same calculations
could be made for other elements, providing estimates were made
for provisional intake, by using data presented in Table IX-17.

b.   Land use influences on hazards to humans - Unrestricted and
unmonitored use of plant produce or animal products from sludge-
treated land  in Fulton County presents a potential human health
hazard.  Environmental impacts at this point are minimal because
sludge application rates are relatively low and the acreage developed
for spreading is limited.  Future hazards are also difficult to as-
sess, as some of the necessary research is now in progress.  The ac-
tual hazard level cannot be evaluated until sufficient data is available
                       IX-36

-------
               Table IX-16.   Provisional Recommendations for Cd, Pb and Hg
                              (Adapted from WHO Technical Report Series 505, 1972)
  Element
Cd
Hg  (total)
    (methyl)
Acceptable Daily
Intake (mg/person)
      none
      none
      none
      none
Provisional  Daily
Intake (mg/person)
      0.07
      0.043
      0.029
      0.43
Average Food
Level (mg/Kg)
    0.024
    0.015
    0.01
    0.15
 Element
Cd
Hg
Pb
4
Maximum Water
Level (mg/1)
0.01
0.005
0.1
Maximum Daily
Water Intake^
(nig/person)
0.025
0.0025
0.25
                                                                   2 6
                                                 Average Food Level
                                                Excluding Water (mg/kg)
                                                         0.016
                                                         0.014
                                                         0.062
 Figure represents average daily intake over a 7-day averaging period.
2
 Assuming adult intake of 2.9 Kg/da.
3
 Does not apply for children.
 Manual for evaluating public drinking water supplies (1971), U.S. EPA.
 Assuming intake of 2.51/day.
 Assuming H^O levels to be at a maximum.
                                        IX-37

-------
 Table IX- 17.
Recommended Limits for Drinking
Water (EPA Manual  for Evaluating Pub-
lic Drinking Water Supplies,  1971)
Element
 As
 Ba
 Cd
 Cl
 Cr
 Cu
 F
 Fe
 Pb
 Mn
 Hg
 Se
 Ag
 Na
 Zn
N03-
so/
                    Maximum
                Allowable Limits
                     [rngTT)
                      0.1
                      1.0
                      0.01
                    250
                      0.05
                      1.0
                      1.1-1.8*
                      0.3
                      0.05
                      0.05
                      0.005
                      0.01
                      0.05
                    270.
                      5.
                     10.
                    250.
*Dependent upon air temperature.
                   IX-38

-------
from soil, plant, and animal studies, especially dealing with

element uptake and bioaccumulation.  The actual hazard to humans

will also stem from future use of reclaimed strip-mined land and

agriculture practices.  No valid assessment can presently be

drawn due to the lack of information.  A preliminary hazard an-

alysis profile is shown as follows:


                       Worst Case
     Sale of land to farm operators who live on the premises
     and raise their own food with no monitoring or controls.

     Rural housing development where residents garden with no
     monitoring controls.
                        Best Case
     Land remains in hands of the MSDGC with rental  to farmers,
     providing management and monitoring controls.

     Land developed for outdoor recreation, prairie  preserva-
     tion, and tree farms.
                      Average Case
     Land remains in hands of the MSDGC until  hazards  are de-
     fined; crop or pasture land is rented to  farmers  with man-
     agement control.

     Land remains in hands of the MSDGC until  hazards  are de-
     fined; crop or pasture land is rented to  farmers  without
     management control, but all produce is sampled and tested
     prior to release.

     Development of confined livestock operations  for  beef cat-
     tle or swine; produce is sampled and tested prior to release.

     Land is developed  as fish and wildlife preserve with hunting
     and fishing allowed after establishing zero hazard level;
     management and monitoring controls are provided.
                           IX-39

-------
     Since this review is primarily oriented to assessing the
potential for causing human health problems, current and hypo-
thetical future land uses and controls are an important consider-
ation.   Current uses of the land include row crop production
(corn and soybeans) and pasture (sudax and alfalfabrome) for
beef cattle production.  A small prairie conservation project
is also underway.   Future effects of land use can be considered
under three classifications:  agriculture, conservation and
community.

     Four general  potential types of agricultural land use are
pasture (beef or dairy), row crop (corn or soybeans), tree farms,
and feedlots (beef or swine).  Potential hazard from pasture
development and grazing is great enough to warrant restricting
it to sites where monitoring indicates no hazard.  The same holds
true for row crops.  There would appear to be no hazard with tree
farming.  Use of the land for feedlots, assuming they are con-
fined to well-drained sites with runoff containment, may be feasi-
ble for cattle but not for swine or other rooters.  There are
potential adverse effects from the use of crops or forages raised
on project fields in the diet of animals grown for slaughter.

     Conservational land uses include prairie restoration, hunt-
ing and fishing.  A hazard to humans may exist with consumption
of fish or wildlife from land spread with sludge.  Until the
safety of such produce is known, the harvest of fish and wild-
life should be controlled.  Aside from this restriction, there
appears to be no hazard with respect to outdoor recreation.

     However, rural housing development, on land applied with
sludge,does present potential hazards great enough to warrant
prohibition.  A family living in a rural or semi-rural environ-
ment may obtain food from home gardening or raising domestic
animals, in which case a majority of their food intake may ori-
ginate from land treated with sludge.
                          IX-40

-------
C.    MEASURES TO PREVENT OR MITIGATE INDIRECT HEALTH HAZARDS

     As in the previous chapter, recommendations are presented here in
terms of actions supporting a more thorough evaluation of the hazards and
actions which would reduce known or suspected hazards.

     1.   Improved Evaluation of Hazards

          An independent party, in cooperation with the MSDGC, Illinois EPA,
     U.S. EPA and University of Illinois, should collect and publish all
     existing and future information pertaining to the Fulton County project.
     Such data would be made available to all interested parties.  A coor-
     dinated research and monitoring program for soils, crops and pasture,
     domestic animals and wildlife should then be formulated with the assis-
     tance of an advisory group representing the involved agencies and com-
     munities.  Research findings should be made available at least one year
     in advance of any scheduled or unplanned change in agricultural and
     sludge spreading practices.  The independent party should have the au-
     thority to confirm MSDGC analyses when necessary, and to require ade-
     quate sampling of soil and crops.

          Several sections of fields should be set aside at the Fulton
     County project for evaluating:

          •    Sludge application rates and practices in demonstration
               fields in the immediate future
          •    Uptake of new or different plant varieties
          0    Changes occurring when sludge application is halted.

     A comprehensive program should be developed for the evaluation of soil
     inorganic and organic elements:

          •    Prior to leveling
          0    After leveling
          0    After initial high sludge application rates
          0    On a yearly basis thereafter.

                                    IX-41

-------
     A similar program should be developed  to  evaluate  inorganic and

organic components of crops  and animals  raised at the Fulton County
project.  Workshops should be held to determine reasonable levels of

contamination for animal  and plant produce  grown for commercial  mar-

kets.


2.   Reduction of Known or Suspected  Hazards


     Two measures in particular deserve  attention:
          Increase the efficiency  of wastewater  treatment to  reduce
          the concentrations  of heavy metals  in  the 3udge,  perhaps
          through increased industrial  pre-treatment.

          Minimize pathogen content  at the  time  of application  by
          longer retention  in sludge lagoons  and Fulton  County
          holding basins.
                               IX-42

-------
                              BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allaway, W. H., "Agronomic Controls Over the Environmental  Cycling of
Trace Elements," U.S.  Plant, Soil  and Nutrition Laboratory, U.S.  Depart-
ment of Agriculture, Ithaca, New York, 1968.

American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater, 1965.

Andersson, A. and K. 0. Nilsson, "Enrichment of Trace Elements  from Sew-
age Sludge Fertilizer in Soils  and Plants," Ambio,  V. 1, No. 5,  1972.

Bingham, F. T., et al., "Growth and Cadmium Accumulation of Plants Grown
on a Soil Treated With a Cadmium Enriched Sewage Sludge," Journal  Environ.
Quality. V. 4, 1975.

Bondurant, D. T., "Some Aspects of Conservation Practices and Agricultural
Related Pollutants," Iowa Acad. Sci. Proc.. V.  77,  1970.

Bowen, H. M. M., Trace Elements in Biochemistry, Academic Press:   New York,
1966.

Brown, J., et al., "Influence of Particle Size  Upon the Retention of Par-
ti cul ate Size by Human Lung," Am.  Journal Pub.  Health,  V. 40, 1950.

Burge, W. D., "Health Aspects of Applying Sewage Wastes to  Land," Univer-
sity of Michigan, 1974.

Surges, A. and F. Row, Soil  Biology, Academic Press:  New York,  1967.

Chaney, Personal Communication, 1975.

Curry, M. G. and G.  M. Gigliotti,  "Cycling and  Control  of Metals," Pro-
ceedings of an Environmental Resources Conference,  National Environmental
Research Center, Ohio, 1973.

Dowdy, R. H. and W.  E. Larson,  "The Availability of Sludge-Borne  Metals  to
Various Vegetable Crops," Journal  Environ. Quality, V.  4, 1975.

Drewy, W. A., "Virus Soil Interactions," Landspreading  Municipal  Effluent
and Sludge in Florida," Proc. Workshop, 1973.

Drewy, W. A. and R.  Eliassen, "Virus Movement in Groundwater,"  Journal
Water Pollution Control Federation. V. 40, 1968.

Dunlop, S. G., "Survival of Pathogens and Related Disease Hazards,"  Pro-
ceedings of the Symposium on Municipal Sewage Effluent  for  Irrigation,"
Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, July 1968.

Erickson, A. E., Recycling Municipal Sludges and Effluents, p.  75, 1973.

Fuchs, N. A., The Mechanics  of  Aerosols, Pergamon Press: New York,  1964.
                                  IX-43

-------
Fuller, J. E. and W.  Litsky, "Escherichia Coin  in Digested Sludge," Sew-
age and Industrial Wastes. V.  22, 1950.

Garcia, W. J., et al., "Physical-Chemical Characteristics and Heavy Metal
Content of Corn Grown on Sludge Wastes Strip-Mine Soil,"  Journal  Agr.  Food
Chain, V. 22, 1974.

Garcia, W. J., et al., "Heavy  Metals in Whole Kernel  Corn Determined by
Atmoic Absorption," Cereal Chemistry, V.  51,  1974.

Geering, H. R., et al., "Solubility and Redox Criteria for the Possible
Forms of Selenium in Soils," Soil Sci. Soc.  Amer. Proc.,  V. 32, 1968.

Hall, G., Personal Communication, 1975.

Hinesly, Personal Communication, 1975.

Hinesly, T. D., et al.. "Use of Waste Treatment Plant Solids for Mined
Land Reclamation," American Mining Congress  Journal,  S8,  No. 9, September
1972.

Hinesly, T. D., et al., "Agricultural Benefits  and Environmental  Changes
Resulting from the Use of Digested Sewage Sludge on Field Crops," U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency C06-EC-000801,  1971.

Hinesly, T. D., et al., Factors Determining  Loading Rates of Digested
Sludge on Agricultural Lands (unpublished document),  1974.

Helnke, Personal Communication, 1975.

Hubbell, D. S. and G. Staten,  "Studies on Soil  Structure; What It is, How
Cultural Practices Affect It,  How It Affects Cotton Yields," N. Mex. Agr.
Expt. Stat. Tech. Bull. 365, October 1951.

Jones, R., et al., "A Cadmium Content of Soybeans Grown on Sewage Sludge
Amended Oil."Journal Environ.  Quality, V. 2, 1973.

Kabler, P.,  "Removal of Pathogenic Microorganisms by Sewage Treatment Pro-
cesses," Sewage Ind. Wastes, V. 31, 1959.

King, L. D. and H. D. Morris,  "Land Disposal of Liquid Sewage Sludge:  II.
The Effect on Soil pH, Manganese, Zinc, and  Growth and Chemical Composi-
tion of Rye  (Secale cerea 1 e L_.)," Journal of Environmental Quality 1 (4),
1972.

Leeper, G. W., Reactions  of Heavy Metals with Soil with Special Regard to
Their Application  in Sewage Wastes, Department of Army Corps of Engineers,
Report of Contract No. DACW73073-C-0026, 1973.

Lehman, G. S. and  L. W. Wilson,  "Trace Element Removal from Sewage Effluent
by Soil Filtration," Water Resources Research. V. 7, 1971.

LeRiche, H.  H., "Metal Contamination of Soil in the Woburn Market - Garden
Experiment Resulting from the Application of Sewage Sludge," Journal Agr.
Sci., V. 71,  1968.

                                  IX-44

-------
Lindsay, W. L., "Inorganic Phase Equilibria of Micronutrients in Soils,"
Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1972.

Lindsay, W. L. and E. C. Moreon, "Phosphate Phase Equilibria in Soils,"
Soil Sci. Cos. Am. Proc.. V. 24, 1960.

Miller, R. H., The Microbiology of Sewage Sludge Decomposition in Soil,
EPA Report, 1973.

Milton, R. H., "Soil Microbiological Aspects of Recycling Sewage Sludges
on Waste Effluents on Land," in Recycling Municipal Sludges and Effluents
on Land, EPA conference, 1973.

Mitchell, R. L., "The Spectrochemical Analysis of Soils, Plants, and Re-
lated Materials," Commonw. Bur. Soils, No. 44A, 1964.

Melsted, S. W., "Soil Plant Relationships," in Recycling Municipal  Sludges
and Effluents on Land. 1973.

Mortvedt, J. J. and P. M. Giordano, "Response of Corn to Zinc and Chro-
mium in Municipal Wastes Applied to Soil," Journal Environ. Quality, V. 4,
No. 2, 1975.

Olsen, S. R., "Micronutrient Interactions, Micronutrients in Agriculture,"
Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1972.

Page, A. L., "Fate and Effects of Trace Elements in Sewage Sludge When
Applied to Agricultural Lands - a Literature Review Study," EPA 670/2-
74-005, 1974.

Patterson, Personal Communication, 1975.

Patterson, J. B. E., "Metal Toxicities Arising from Industry, Trace Ele-
ments in Soils and Crops," Min. Ag. Fisheries and Food Technical Bulletin
No. 21, 1966.

Patterson, J. B. E., "Metal Toxicities Arising from Industry," Min. of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Technical Bulletin No. 21, 1971.

Pariyek, R. R., et al., "Wastewater Renovation and Conservation," Penn.
State University Studies, No. 23, 1967.

Peerlkamp, P. K., "The Influence of Soil Structure on the Natural Organic
Manuring by Roots and Stubbles of Crops," Trans. 4th Int. Cong., Soil  Sci..
V. 2, 1950.

Peterson, J. R. and J. Gschwind, "Amelioration of Coal Mine Spoils  with
Digested Sewage Sludge," Research and Applied Technology Symposium  on Mined-
Land Reclamation," National Coal Association, 1973.

Philip, J. R., "Evaporation and Moisture and Heat Fields in the Soil,"
Journal Meteorol. V. 14, 1957.
                                  IX-45

-------
Plotkin, S. and M. Katy, Minimal  Infective Doses  of Viruses for Man by the
Oral Route, Interscience:  New York,  1965.

Poon, C., "Studies on the Instantaneous Death of  Airborne Escherichia Coli,"
Am. Journal Epidemic!.. V.  84, 1966.

Purves, "Consequences of Trace Element Contamination of Soils," Environ.
Pollution. V. 3, 1972.

Randall, C. W. and J. 0. Ledbetter,  "Bacterial  Air  Pollution from Activated
Sludge Units," Am. Ind. Hyg.  Assoc. Journal.  V. 27, 1966.

Richards, L. A. (ed.), "Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali
Soils," USDA Agricultural Handbook. No.  60, 1954.

Russell, E. J., Soil  Conditions and Plant Growth. 1961.

Sepp, E., "The Use of Sewage  for  Irrigation - A Literature Review," Bureau
of Sanitary Engineering, California Department of Public Health, 1971.

Smith, K. A. and S. W. F. Restall, "The Occurrence  of Ethylene in Anaero-
bic Soil," Journal of Soil  Sci..  V. 22, 1971.

Thome, M. D., et al., "Utilization of Sewage Sludge on  Agricultural  Land,"
Illinois Cooperative Extension Service, SM-29,  April  1975.

United States Environmental Protection Agency,  "Agricultural  Benefits and
Environmental Changes Resulting from  the Use  of Digested Sewage Sludge on
Field Crops," (SW-30d), 1971.

United States Environmental Protection Agency,  "Manual  for Evaluating Pub-
lic Drinking Water Supplies,"  1971.

University of Illinois and MSDGC  Department of Research  and Development,
"Digested Sludge Recycle to Land," Report to  Fulton County Steering Com-
mittee, No. 74-21, March 14,  1975.

Walker, J. M., et al., "Trench Incorporation  of Sewage Sludge in Marginal
Agricultural Land," Biol. Waste Management Laboratory, Agriculture Environ.
Quality Inst., ARS, USDA; and Md. Environ. Serv., Dept.  of Natural Resources:
Report to D. C. Bureau of Wastewater  Treatment, 1974.

Wakesman, S. A., Principles of Soil Microbiology, Williams and Wilkins Co.,
Maryland, 2nd Edition, 1932.

Ward, P. C., "Sanitary Filtration Study," Bur.  of Sanitary Engineering,
Dept. of Public Health, California, 1965.

Webber, J., "Effects of Toxic Metals  in Sewage on Crops,"  Water Pollution
Control. V. 71, 1972.

Wellings, F. M., et al., "Virus Studies in a  Spray  Irrigation Project," in
Landscaping Municipal Effluent and Sludge in  Florida.  Proc. Workshop, 1973.

WHO Technical Report Series 505,  1972.


                                  IX-46

-------
APPENDIX A:  IEPA Water Pollution Control Permit
                    A-l

-------
                   ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         WATER POLLUTiON CONTROL PERMIT
  Permit Number:   1974-DB-444-OP                               DATE ISSUED: March 7,   1974
                                                       PROJECT LOG NUMBERS: 3586_?3/3g87-7;
  SUBJECT-. FULTON COUNTY -  Metropolitan Sanitary District     3688-73,174-74
                                of  Greater  Chicago Sludge  Disposal  175-74
                                Proj-ect  - Comprehensive  Operating Permit
PERMITTEE TO OPERATE:
                            Metropolitan  Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
                            100  East Erie Street
                            Chicago, Illinois    60611
       Permit is hereby granted to the above designated permittee
to operate  water  pollution control  facilities described  as  follows:
       The sludge transportation  system,  sludge storage facilities  and
sludge  application  fields  previously approved under Permits I1971-DA-470
#1971-DA-487-l,' U972-DA-215,  #1973-DB-1460-OP,  #1973-DB-1460-OP-1,
£1973-DB-1492, f1973-DB-1492-1,  U973-DB-1682,  U973-DB-1682-1, 31973-DE
1752,  #1973-DB-2185 and #1974-DB-45-COP.
       This Operating Permit expires  on March  7,  1975.
       The Application for Operating  Permit and supporting documents
approved by this  Permit were  prepared by  Metropolitan Sanitary District
of Greater  Chicago  and  are identified  in  the records  of  the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Water Pollution Control,
Permit  Section by the Ipg  numbers designated in the subject above.
       This Permit  renews and replaces Permit  Numbers #1971-DA-470,
S1971-DA-487-1, S1972-DA-215,  *1973-DB-1460-OP,  #1973-DB-1460-OP-1,
I1973-DB-1492, #1973-DB-1492-1,  U973-DB-1682,  H973-D3-1682-1,
#1973-DB-1752, S1973-DB-2185  and £1974-DB-45-COPf  which  were previously
   pcAnAii rnMmTinwcranpeii, iv.      (continued on Page 2)
READ ALL CONDITIONS CAREFULLY:
  STANDAPO CONDITIONS
    Pertaining to both construction and operation ptrmils.

      1   II any statement Or representation is found to bt incorrect, this
  permit may bn the installation, maintenance or
  operation of the proposed sewage works; tcl does not take into consideration the
  structural stability of any units or pant or the protect, and Id) does not release
  the permittee from compliance w*th other applicable statutes of the State of
  Illinois, or with applicable local laws, regulation! or ordinances.

      4.  Treatment works will be operated or supervised by a duly qualified
  semge vw.ks. operator certified under the Regulations of the Environmental
  Protection Agency

      5  The treatment works or wastewater sourc* covered by this parmit
   shall b« constructld and operated in compliance with the provision of the
   Environmental Protection Act and Chapter 3 of the Rules and Regulations as
   adopted by tn* Illinois Pollution Control Board.


      6  Plans, specifications and ether documentation submitted shall con-
   stitute a pin of thf app'-cation and when approved shall constitute part of the
   perm i

      7.  This Permit may not be assigned or transferred without  a new
   permit from thr Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
                                             Pertaimna, only to construction permits.

                                                1.   Tftere shall b* no deviations from the approved plans and spec-
                                             ifications unless revised plans, specifications, and application shall first have b*en
                                             submitted to the Environmental protection Agency and a supplemental written
                                             permit issued.

                                                2.   The installation shall be made under the supervision of an inspector.
                                             who is familiar with the approved plans and specifications provided bf and
                                             approved by tht owner, and said inspector shall require that construction complies
                                             with tha plant and specifications approved by this Agency.

                                                3.   Unless otherwise stated by Special Condition, construction must be
                                             completed in three years for treatment works and two years for sewers and
                                             wastewater sources.

                                                4.   Unless otherwise stated by Special Condition, the issuance of this
                                             permit shall be a joint construction and operation permit provided that.
                                                 a)
                                                    AllitandardandSoecialConditions.ancamBhedwith.
                                                 b)  This Agency is notified v.ithm ten (10) day*. r*$p*ciivtly. o* tht
                                                    start of construction and th» fiat* of tnung and start-up of full
                                                    operation.


                                                 cl  Thi submmion of operating reports of tht treatment worfc\ cov*r«oi
                                                    permit, the permittee shall apply fa* a renewal of the operation
                                                    permit.
   This permit is issued in accordance with the Illinois Environmental Protection Act of 1970 and the Chapter III Water
   Pollution Regulations adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board in March of 1972.
 TRW:CWF:il
 ccrGrants &  Tax,  Region  II  &  III
 Fulton Co. Health Dept-,  Pulton Co.
 Ed.  of Supervisors,  MSDGC-R. Riir.kus
                                   H.McMillan
                                   J.Braxton

                                          Ar2
                                                 DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
                                                  William H.  Busch
                                                 Manager, Permit Section
                                                                                      FUcyclex-l

-------
Page 2                          March 7, 1974

FULTON COUNTY - Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
                Sludge Disposal Project - Comprehensive Operating Permit


issued for the herein permitted facilities.
     The Standard Conditions of issuance of this Permit are itemized
on Page 1.   (Special Conditions applicable are itemized below).

This Permit is issued subject to the following Special Conditions.
If such Special Conditions require additional or revised facilities,
satisfactory engineering plan documents must be submitted to this
Agency for review and approval for issuance of a Supplemental Permit.

SPECIAL CONDITION #•!•;  Upon termination .of the sludge transportation
activities, the Sanitary District shall be responsible for the proper
removal and disassembly of non-permanent equipment for which this
permit is issued.

The proper disassembly includes, but is not limited to, the cleaning
of the pipeline so no sludge residue will escape to any area other
than the properly permitted holding basins.

SPECIAL CONDITION '#2:  This permit is issued on the basis that any
surveillance activity by the staff of this Agency does not relieve
the applicant from sole responsibility for establishing and continuing
a surveillance program for monitoring and detecting any discharge of
waters which do not meet the applicable provisions of the Environ-
mental Protection Act or the Rules and Regulations of .the Pollution
Control Board.

SPECIAL CONDITION #3;  The sludge transported to the Fulton County
site shall be adequately digested and suitable for land application
based on the parameters presented in Table 2 of the report entitled
"Quality of  Digested Sludge Suitable for Land Application" prepared
by the Research and Development Department of the Metropolitan
Sanitary District of Greater Chicago, dated July 23, 1973.

"SPEC-JEM; CONDITION -Mt- • This Permit does not relieve the District of
sole responsibility for the existing discharges .to the waters of the
State which  may have occurred through mining activity or any other
past activity in this area, which do not meet the applicable provisions
of the Environmental Protection Act or Illinois Pollution Control
Board Rules  and Regulations.

SPECIAL CONDITION 45:  The District shall' maintain a minimum of  four  (4)
feet freeboard in the lagoons at all times.

SPECIAL CONDITION #6;  The District must  submit to this Agency,  in
addition to  the quarterly reports currently submitted, a monthly report.
Tho operational information to be contained in the monthly report must
be  satisfactory to the Agency and the report must be submitted in
triplicate within  20 days of the end of the month covered by  the report.


                            A-3

-------
Page 3                          March 7,  1974

FULTON COUNTY - Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
                Sludge Disposal Project - Comprehensive Operating Permit


SPECIAL CONDITION #7;  Up to date sampling data and operational in-
formation to be used in the monthly reports must be available for
inspection by this Agency's personnel at the Fulton County Site.

SPECIAL CONDITION |8;_  If for any reason the District abandons this
project, it is required that the sludge holding basins be emptied of
sludge and the sludge be disposed of in a manner which will not cause
pollution.

"SPECIAL CONDITION $9:  The effluent discharged from any retention basin
approved under this Permit must meet the applicable effluent requirements
for discharge to the waters of the State as required by Illinois Pol-
lution Control Board Rules and Regulations Chapter 3.  The point of
discharge to the waters of the State is considered to be the overflow
structure of each of the retention basins.

SPECIAL CONDITION #10:  This Permit is issued with the .condition that
the following contaminant concentrations are considered to be back-
ground values and the numerical effluent standards shall be considered
met at the designated effluent sampling point described in Special
Condition #9 when the background concentration plus the allowable
regulatory concentration Is greater than the measured concentration
for the appropriate parameter:
                       Total Suspended                    Fecal
                       Solids                 BOD         Cbliform
                                                              FC
                                                             100 m3

arithmetic
mean                     61.7                 2.75

std. dev.                87.3                 1.48

geometric
mean                      —                    -             94.3
 SPECIAL CONDITION #11;  In order to provide storage for the capture of
 a  100 year frequency storm, the District shall remove waters from the
 retention basins as soon as practicable after a storm.  This Agency
 shall require that records be kept of precipitation and the approximate
 amounts of runoff pumped back to the fields or discharged and that
 these results be submitted along with the monthly operation reports.

                            A-4

-------
Page- 4                          March 7, 1974

FULTON COUNTY - Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago
                Sludge Disposal Project - Comprehensive Operating Permit


SPECIAL CONDITION #12t;  The District shall maintain at least one
control plot on which crops are grown without the application of
sludge in order to provide a continuing source of data regarding
the runoff from such fields.  The runoff from the control plot shall
be monitored and the results submitted to this Agency as a part of
the monthly operation reports.

SPECi:a& CONDITION #13;  The District shall restrict its procedures
of land application to subsurface injection or ridge and furrow
application whenever practical.

SPECIAL CONDITION 114;  The District shall monitor the metals content
of the crops harvested from the sludge application fields and shall
submit the results to this Agency in the monthly operation reports.

SPECIAL CONDITION #15;  This Permit includes the construction of the
supernatant piping around the sludge holding basins.
                              A-5

-------

-------
APPENDIX B:  Atmospheric Ammonia Concentrations,
               by Temperature and Windspeed
                     B-l

-------

' ; _

; ; i ; -, -j- -
t : :
un
! ' '
;
.- L
i ----- - : -
1
^f
j j , l , ,

! ,

1
1 It
CO CM O O
o
1


o
1
                                                o
                                                ID
                                                o
                                                CO
                                                    o
                                                   o
                                                o
                                                CM
                                                     Q.
                                                          cn
                                                         LO
                                                         r-.
                                                         01
                                                          CM
                                                          r-~.
                                                          cn
                                                          CJ
                                                          u
                                                          S-
                                                          3
                                                          O
                                                          oo
(iudd)eHN  '
     B-2

-------
B-3

-------
                                                                O)
                                                               LO
                                                                o
                                                                i-
                                                               -C
                                                                03
                                                               CM
                                                               CTl
                                                               CJ3
                                                               Q
                                                               OO
                                                                O)
                                                                o

                                                                3
                                                                o
                                                               00

                                                                "3
B-4

-------
                                                           CD
                                                          ID
                                                          cn
                                                          o
                                                          s-
                                                          CM
                                                          t-~
                                                          CTt
                                                          o
                                                          Q
                                                          00
                                                           O>
                                                           O
                                                          (O
(iudd)HN
      B-5

-------
.   J-\    	   '
!~  Oi, A
                                               o
                                               co
                                               CM
                                                    Q.
                                            .  o
                                                         O)
                                                         in
                                                         en
                                                         CD
                                                         3
                                                         O
                                                         fO
                                                         CVJ
                                                         en
                                                         o
                                                         CU
                                                         O
                                                         s_
                                                         3
                                                         o
                                                         oo

                                                         (O
1 II
ID ^J- CO
1
CM
1 ' 1
,—

O
O 1
    (uidd)£HN
     B-6

-------
(uidd)bHN
       B-7

-------
                                               O
                                               ro
                                               o
                                               C\J
                                               o
                                           -   o
                                                     0
                                                    0
                                                      d)
                                                     I—     CD
                                                           IT)

                                                      E    CT!
                                                            C7>
                                                            O
                                                            fO
                                                           CJ
                                                           
-------
APPENDIX C:  Trends of Nitrite and Nitrate Nitrogen in Wellwater
                          C-l

-------
 CO
o


 CM
O
0.2

0.15


0.1

0.05

   0
             1973
                        1974
1975
                                                               Well 1
C  1.5
 OO
o
 CM
o
1.0

0.5


  0
             1973
                        1974
1975
                               1.52 ppm
 CD
  CO
O
 CM
 O
    0.2
    0.1
  00
 CD
  CM
 O
     0.2
  oo
 o
     0.1
  C\J
 o
             1973  J
                        1974
            0.3l Xo.43 ppm
             1973
                        1974
1975
                   I
             1973  J
                        1974
1975
                                                               Well 4
                                                               Well 6
                                                               Hell  15
                                                                Well  16
                                                           I
                                                           J
       Trend  of Nitrite and  Nitrate  Nitrogen  for  Background Wells
       (MSDGC, 1972a  through 1975g;  Enviro  Control,  Inc.,  1976)
                               C-2

-------
     1.0
 n
o
 CVJ
o
CT
 CO

O
 (D

O
 e\j
o
     0.5
  0



0.5


0.4

0.3


0.2


0.1


  0




0.15


0.10


0.05
                                                          Well  17
             1973    J
             1973   J
             1973   J
                      1974
                      1974
                      1974
1975
                                                          Well  18
1975
                                                          Well  19
1975
o>
 CO
o
 C\J
o
3


2



1
             1973
                      1974
                                                          Well  20
1975
      0.2
                                     r
                                      1.5  ppm
 CO

O

<£^


 CM

O
      0.1
                     I «
             1973   J
                                                 Well  21
                      1974        J



                         (continued)


                       C-3
1975

-------
— .
en
CO
O
CM
O
* —

^
01
CO
0
CM
O


0.15
0.10

0.05
0

0.15

0.10
0.05 .
0

.0.39 ppm
Well 24

	 	 ' 	 — -^—
• •• • • • .» •
i * • * T I
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J

t
Well 25
• • • •
,'•*,!? ,_?*.•"* t . . * 	 1
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
 CO
o
     0.2   .
     0.1
Well 26
CM
O
CD
CO
g
CM
O
s:
0
0.15
0.10
0.05 .
3
?"..*.., T * •...+•"* 	 l
1973 J ' 1974 J 1975 J
• *
Well 27

• t • *.-•.+•** i
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
                                  (continued)
                                C-4

-------
     0.2


^   0.15
 CD
^   0.1


     0.05
 CO
o
 Csl
O
         0
                     -L
               1973  J
                               1974
                                                  '1.72  ppm
1975
                                                                 Well  2
 CM
O
      1.0
 en
£    0.5
 CO
o
      15
      10
 co
O

 CM   5
o
      0
               1973  J
                     JL
               1973    J
                                       • ,  i
                               1974
1975
                                               •  • • '
                              1974
1975
                                                                Well 7
                                                                Well 8
                 Trend of Nitrite and Nitrate Nitrogen of
                 Possibly Contaminated Wells or Springs  (MSDGC,
                 1972a through  1975g; Enviro Control, Inc., 1976)
                                 C-5

-------
      0.2
 ro
o
 C\J
o
 OT
O
 C\J
o
 n
o
 C\J
o
0.1





  0



  ,40


  30


  20


  10


   0



0.15


0.10


0.05


   0
               .  .  . .  t
               1973   J
               1973    J
                                                          Well  9
1974
1975
                                                          Well 10
1974
                  A0.42  ppn
               1973    J
                         1974
1975
                                                          Well 11
                      1975
     0.1
                                                    Well  12
 C\J
i1     o
CD
 c\j
o
     0.2
     0.1
               1973   J
                      I
                         1974
              1973   J
                         1974
                                 (continued)
                      1975
                                                    Well  13
                      1975
                                C-6

-------
^ 0.15
CD
~ 0.1
ro
f 0.05.
C\J '
O
z 0
— 0.15
i—
— 0.10
en
| 0.05
OJ
i o
0.2
1 0.1
ro
O
+
CM
i 0
_ 0.2
en
o" o.i
CSJ
o
0
-
Well 14
i
i ,.--.• I.., J
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
.
Well 22
	 ! . . • . . 1 	 I
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
Well 23

,- *.*,!?. .,.»., ?..!,.• 	 I
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
9


* " * .
, , , , , t , , , 	 I . , , 	 I
1973 J 1974 J 1975 J
C-7

-------

-------