United States Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection Information
Agency Cincinnati OH 45268
September 1980
P/EPA flECHNOLOGY
IQRANSFER
The Bridge Between
Research and Use
Design Manual for Onsite Wastewater Treatment and
Disposal Systems Featured at 1980 WPCF Conference
The Technology Transfer Design Manual for Onsite Wastewater Treatment and
Disposal Systems will be distributed at the 53rd Annual Conference and Exhibition of
the Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF) in Las Vegas, Nevada, September 28 -
October 2, 1980.
Because of the recent population movements to rural areas and poor public
acceptance of onsite systems in the past, EPA has developed this new design manual
to provide technical guidance on the design, construction and maintenance of onsite
treatment systems The manual was written by personnel from SCS Engineers and
Rural Systems Engineering. Contract supervision was provided by the EPA Office of
Water Program Operations and the Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory in
Cincinnati, Ohio The manual was published in cooperation with the Center for
Environmental Research Information, Cincinnati, Ohio.
This manual covers guidelines for (1) design, including such topics as wastewater
characteristics, treatment and disposal methods, and strategy for onsite system
design, (2) construction, including a procedure for conducting a site evaluation; and
(3) management of onsite systems, including a discussion of theory and types of
management.
Several EPA organizations have pooled resources to form an EPA service and exhibit
center at this year's WPCF Conference. Specific areas of interest to be featured in EPA
exhibits are effluent guidelines, controlled and uncontrolled hazardous waste,
groundwater and underground injection, water quality management, construction
grants, and the research and development contribution to water pollution control.
Individuals will be available at each exhibit to discuss EPA policy and answer
questions. We invite you to visit the EPA displays and pick up a copy of the Onsite
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems Design Manual, at Booth No 592 To
order this Manual, fill out the order form at the back of this Newsletter (#1012) and
return it to CERI
-------
Sulfide Precipitation Summary
Report for Metal Finishing Industry
The Center for Environmental Research Informaton has
published a new Summary Report discussing sulfide
precipitation as a wastewater treatment technique for
electroplating and other metal finishing operations The
report was developed by the Metals and Inorganic
Chemicals Branch, Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio It is the second m a series of
control and treatment technology alternatives for the-
electroplating industry The first report discusses evapora-
tion as a technique for recovering plating chemicals from
wastewater.
The 1977 Clean Water Act requires that metal finishing
operations control the oxidation of cyanide, the reduction
of hexavalent chromium, the removal of heavy metals, and
pH Sulfide precipitation is one of many methods available
for removing metals from metal finishing process waste-
water.
Metals are commonly removed by adding an alkali, such as
hydrated lime or caustic soda, to adjust the pH of the
wastewater to the point where metals exhibit minimum
solubilities and will therefore precipitate out as metal
hydroxides. In some metal finishing operations, the
hydroxide process may exhibit limited removal efficiencies
due to solubility characteristics of metals at different pH
values and the presence of complexmg ions. If this occurs,
sulfide precipitation is an alternative to hydroxide precipi-
tation. The high reactivity of sulfides with heavy metal ions
and the insolubility of heavy metals to sulfides over a broad
pH range are attractive features as compared to hydroxide
precipitation Sulfide precipitation can also achieve low
metal solubilities in the presence of complex ions.
Sulfide precipitation can be either soluble or insoluble In
the soluble sulfide precipitation (SSP) process, the sulfide
is added as a water-soluble reagent such as sodium
sulfide The insoluble sulfide precipitation (ISP) process
adds a slightly soluble ferrous sulfide (FeS) slurry to the
wastewater to supply the sulfide ions neededto precipitate
the heavy metals.
This report describes the soluble and insoluble sulfide
process theory, presents plant evaluations, system
descriptions, and performance, and discusses costs and
reliability for the treatment systems and components
To order the report, complete the order form at the back of
this Newsletter (#8003) and return it to CERI
Addendum to Choosing the Optimum
Financial Strategies Publication
(Publication 3005)
Since the October 1978 printing of Choosing Optimum
Financial Strategies, two elements that can have a signi-
ficant bearing upon the choice of strategy for pollution
control investment have changed. Those two elements are
the Federal Tax Law, which has been modified, and
interest rates, which have sharply increased. An update to
the original publication has been prepared to describe
these changes and to present a number of examples from
the original publication that have been recalculated to
illustrate their effect. Also revised are state financing and
tax incentives and user charge/industrial cost recovery
systems
Future distribution of the Opt/mum Financial Strategies
report will include a copy of the Update To order a copy of
the Update only, call or write
Norm Kulujian
USEPA—CERI
Cincinnati, OH 45268
(513) 684-7394
CERI Initiates New
Publication Series for Industry
A new series of reports Environmental Regulations and
Technology, is being instituted to inform those in specified
industries affected by environmental regulations, about
the latest developments in legislation and techniques for
compliance The first report for the electroplating industry
will be available in October 1 980 Reports targeting other
industries will be produced after effluent guidelines are
promulgated
The electroplating report entitled, Environmental Regula-
tions and Technology: The Electroplating Industry
EPA-625/10-80-001, provides the electroplating industry
with a summary of the laws, regulatory activities, and
technologies that can affect electroplaters' decisions for
wastewater pollution control and solid waste handling and
disposal The regulations recently promulgated by EPA are
presented and water pollution control technologies are
discussed The report also includes information on the
current status of sludge disposal regulations, technologies
and operating techniques that can reduce sludge disposal
costs, and financial assistance available through federally
sponsored programs
A copy of this report can be ordered by completing the form
at the back of this Newsletter (#10001), and returning it to
CERI
-------
Seminar for Corrosion
Control in Water Distribution Systems
A seminar on Corrosion Control in Water Distribution
Systems, held at the EPA Environmental Research Center
in Cincinnati, Ohio, May 20-22, 1 980, was attended by 1 41
persons, including visitors from Canada, England, West
Germany and the Netherlands The seminar, sponsored by
ORD's Drinking Water Research Division of the Municipal
Environmental Research Laboratory, was held to discuss.
the EPA proposal to regulate corrosivity in drinking water
Among the topics discussed at the meeting were costs
incurred by corrosion and health effects from substances
that may be found in drinking water because of corrosion,
regulatory programs to control corrosion, chemistry of
corrosion, and both water utility activities and EPA
research in support of corrosion control Most of the
speakers and audience agreed that even though corrosion
problems have existed for decades, much work still needs
to be done to understand and control corrosion in water
distribution and consumer plumbing systems The
diversity of water quality throughout the United States and
the many kinds of materials used in water distribution and
consumer plumbing systems make corrosion control an
exceedingly complex problem that defies a simple, univer-
sally applicable solution
Water Quality Management
Trade-Offs Seminar
A seminar on "Water Quality Managements Trade-Offs —
Point Source vs Nonpomt Source Pollutant" was held
September 16-17, 1980, at the Pick Congress Hotel in
Chicago, Illinois The Center for Environmental Research
Information, in cooperation with the USEPA Region V
Great Lakes National Program Office, sponsored the
seminar
The purpose of the seminar was to evaluate the effect of
point and nonpomt source pollution on receiving waters,
especially the Great Lakes In controlling these pollutants,
trade-offs can be made which will most economically meet
water quality goals Water quality policy issues for the
Great Lakes were discussed, followed by presentations on
the various pollutant sources and their effects, load reduc-
tions through management practices, and a methodology
for integrating point and nonpomt source pollution
assessment
Treatability Manual Published
Since 1979, EPA's Office of Enforcement and Office of
Water and Waste Management, with requested help from
the Office of Research and Development, have been
compiling wastewater treatment performance data into a
Treatability Manual The first complete edition of the
Manual, printed in five volumes, is now available for
review at Region Offices and can be purchased from the
Government Printing Office The Manual will be used in
developing NPDES permit limitations for facilities which, at
the time of permit issuance, were not fully covered by
promulgated, industry-specific effluent guidelines
authorized under Sections 301, 304, 306, 307, and 501 of
the Clean Water Act
The planning group which managed the treat ability project
was chaired by William Cawley, Deputy Director, Indus-
trial Environmental Research Laboratory-Cincinnati The
group includes participants from (1) Industrial Environ-
mental Research Laboratory-Cincinnati, (2) Effluent
Guidelines Division, Office of Water and Waste Manage-
ment, (3) Permits Division, Office of Enforcement,
(4) Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory-
Cincinnati, (5) Robert S Kerr Environmental Research
Laboratory-Ada, (6) Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory-Research Triangle Park, (7) National Enforce-
ment Investigation Center, Office of Enforcement,
(8) Center for Environmental Research Information,
(9) Monsanto Research Corporation, (10) Aerospace Cor-
poration, and (11) MATHTECH, Inc
The objectives of the treatability project are
• to provide readily accessible data and information
on treatability of industrial and municipal waste
streams for use by NPDES permit writers,
enforcement personnel, and by industrial or
municipal permit holders
• to provide a basis for research planning by identi-
fying gaps in knowledge of the treatability of
certain pollutants and wastestreams; and
• to set up a system allowing rapid response to
program office requirements for generation of
treatability data.
The primary output from this program is a five-volume
Treatability Manual. The individual volumes are named as
follows-
Volume I - Treatability Data
Volume II - Industrial Descriptions
-------
Volume III - Technologies for Control/Removal of
Pollutants
Volume IV - Cost Estimating
Volume V - Summary
Volume I supplies data on the specific compounds listed in
the Consolidated Permit Application Form 2C (NPDES)
published May 19, 1980. It is intended to provide facsimile
reference to physical data on the pollutants, their
occurrence patterns, and methods of treatment and/or
removal. Pollutants are grouped according to the following
chemical categories:
• Metals and Inorganics
• Ethers
• Phthalates
• Nitrogen Compounds
• Phenols
• Aromatics
• Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
• PCB's and Related Compounds
• Halogenated Hydrocarbons
• Pesticides
• Oxygenated Compounds
• Miscellaneous
Volume II provides generic process descriptions for the
industrial categories. The categories not currently included
will be added as sufficient information becomes available
The objective of Volume II is to characterize the waste-
waters discharged from the above categories on a facility-
by-facility basis prior to pretreatment and after treatment.
The pollution control methods used with the treated final
effluent pollutant concentrations are also provided.
Each industrial category is defined according to the
Standard Industrial-Classification (SIC) Codes of the U S
Department of Commerce and by the general industrial
description found in current contractor draft development
documents and published development documents on
each industry. The categories are generally divided into
subcategones which are described when sufficient data
are available The total number of facilities in each
category discharging an aqueous effluent either directly to
3 receiving stream or indirectly to a publicly owned
treatment works (POTW) is given in an industrial summary
table.
Wastewater characteristics are provided for each
category/subcategory when sufficient information is
available. Subcategory wastewater characteristics are
broken into separate processes when sufficient data are
available These descriptions include the complete pollu-
tant analyses available in the references. These analyses
generally consist of conventional and classical pollutants,
the 129 toxic pollutants, and other miscellaneous pollu-
tants found in the wastewater. The data presented should
be assumed screening quality unless specifically labeled
verification quality
Plant-specific descriptions are also m this volume These
descriptions generally include a treatment system descrip-
tion, plant production, and wastewater flow. Conventional,
classical, and toxic pollutant concentration data, as well as
treatment system removal efficiency are presented in site-
specific tables
Volume III presents performance data and related
technical information for 56 unit operations used in
industrial water pollution control. These operations
include 24 sludge treatment and disposal technologies and
32 generic wastewater treatment technologies classified
as preliminary, primary, secondary, or tertiary treatment.
Each wastewater or sludge treatment/disposal technology
is briefly described, and generalized performance charac-
teristics are given for the preliminary wastewater treat-
ment (conditioning) and sludge processing technologies
However, emphasis is placed on the pollutant removal
capabilities of the 28 primary, secondary, and tertiary
wastewater treatment technologies. Both concentration
and removal efficiency data are given for the following
group of pollutants
(1) conventional pollutants such as biochemical
oxygen demand (BODs), total suspended solids
(TSS), pH, oil and grease, and fecal coliform.
(2) 129 toxic pollutants derived by EPA from the 65
"priority pollutants" listed in a Consent Agree-
ment, Natural Resources Defense Council vs
Train, 8 ERC 2120 (D.D.C. 1976);
(3) compounds selected from the list of substances
designated by EPA as hazardous under authority
of Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, based on
either a consensus of analytical methods or
promulgation under authority of Section 204(h)
of the Clean Water Act; and
(4) other nonconventional pollutants of concern in
specififc industrial wastewaters.
Volume IV presents total capital investment and annual
operating cost information for 78 wastewater treatment
technologies The 78 technologies are grouped into the
following classifications' wastewater conditioning,
primary wastewater treatment, secondary wastewater
treatment, tertiary wastewater treatment, sludge treat-
ment, and disposal A general overview of each technology
is followed by discussion of common modifications, typical
equipment, and a process flow diagram. A brief discussion
-------
of design criteria is also presented, along with any
assumptions used in developing costs for that technology
alone. The cost information for each technology is dis-
played in graphs showing cost in millions of dollars versus
wastewater flowrate or pollutant loading, as appropriate
All costs are indexed to September 1 979, corresponding to
an Engineering News Record Index of 3119, unless other-
wise noted (Further discussion is found in Appendix A —
Economic Assumptions.)
The data presented are generalized, rather than site-
specific, and estimates derived solely from it are valid only
for comparison purposes Even these comparisons must be
performed with caution because of the possible differ-
ences in reliability of performance and cost information
from various sources
Cost data presented have been derived from EPA publica-
tions, open literature, construction grant files and from
equipment manufacturers' information Accuracy of the
data appears to depend on the frequency of use of a
particular process. For example, the costs associated with
activated sludge processes or sedimentation with
chemical addition appear more reliable than those for
reverse osmosis or other processes with few examples of
full-scale installation
Volume V summarizes Volumes I through IV and outlines
their potential utility to National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit writers The Treat-
ability Manual, when used in conjunction with other
information, will enable permit writers to
• evaluate the potential effectiveness and costs of
proposed effluent treatment systems.
• determine the potential cost and feasibility of
compliance with discharge limitations under
consideration, and
• develop wastewater pollution control and
monitoring requirements to be employed at
specific sites.
The Treatability Manual is availble from the Government
Printing Office (GPO). The following information indicates
the actions needed when ordering:
• Superintendent of Documents
U.S Government Printing Office
Department 50
Washington, DC 20402
• Stock Number 055-000-00190-1
• Cost per set: $47.00 (Volumes I-V)
Workshop on Water Quality
Assessment Methodology
A four-day workshop was held at St John's College,
Annapolis, Maryland, May 12-15, 1 980, on water quality
assessment methodology for streams, impoundments and
estuaries The workshop presented techniques that are
included in the manual, Water Quality Assessment- A
Screening Method for Nondesignated 2O8 Areas
(EPA-600/9-77-023)
The screening method is a simplifiedtechmque that can be
accomplished with the assistance of a pocket calculator
The methodology is intended to be used with little external
data input Consequently, abundant data are included as
tables, figures and appendices
These techniques were applied to watersheds, streams
and estuaries in the Chesapeake Bay area and example
problems from that study were presented and worked out
by the participants The workshop was attended by
engineers, scientists and planners from federal, state and
local governmental units and from consulting engineering
firms.
Conference Announcement
The "Conference on Innovation in the Environmental
Technology Industry" sponsored by the USEPA's Office of
Research and Development, Water Pollution Control
Federation (WPCF), Air Pollution Control Association
(APCA), and Environmental Industry Council (EIC) will be
held November 5-6, 1 980, at the Capitol Hilton, 1 6th & K
Streets, NW, Washington, D C The purpose of the confer-
ence will be to explore the key factors and issues
influencing the development and marketing of innovative
technology in the pollution control industry Major areas of
discussion will be technology assessments, venture
capital and financing, impact of regulatory policies, federal
patent policy, investmentfirms perspective, industrial R&D
planning and strategy, and foreign technology exchange
For further information, write to. Sheri Marshall,
Conference Coordinator, Enviro Control, Inc., P 0 Box 827,
Rockville, MD 20851
-------
Overland Flow
Seminar Held
The National Seminar on Overland Flow Technology for
Municipal Wastewater was held in Dallas, Texas, on
September 16-18, 1980. Seminar sponsors included the
USEPA's Center for Environmental Research Information,
the Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
and the Office of Water Program Operations At the
seminar, approximately 200 treatment system planners
and designers received the latest available information on
designing and operating overland flow treatment systems
for municipal wastewater. In addition, seminar speakers
discussed research projects and case histories of operating
systems.
Session moderators included: Ancil A. Jones, EPA Region
VI; Richard Duty, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
Laboratory; and Dick Thomas, EPA Construction Grants
Program.
Workshop on Stream
Water Quality Modeling
Two-day workshops were held in Annapolis, Maryland,
May 6-7, and Chicago, Illinois, May 29-30, 1980, on the
use of the stream water quality model — QUAL II. The
objectives of the workshops were to present the theory
used in the QUAL II Model and to instruct the participants
on its use in a comprehensive basin planning/waste load
allocation situation.
The workshops were sponsored by the USEPA's Center for
Water Quality Modeling, Environmental Research
Laboratory, Athens, Georgia, in cooperation with the
Center for Environmental Research Information. Addi-
tional workshops on usaof this model may be presented m
the future. For information contact Orville Macomber,
USEPA, Center for Environmental Research Information,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, (513) 684-7394.
New Capsule Reports on
Restoration of Polluted Lakes
EPA's Clean Lakes Program, Criteria and Standards
Division, Washington, D.C., has funded cost-sharing
projects under Section 314 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as Amended, to restore freshwater lakes for
public use. Capsule reports have been prepared on three
lake restoration projects to present the methodologies
used in selecting and applying a treatment. Also included
in the reports are costs of treatment and the results that
were achieved. A variety of treatment methods were used
including dredging, addition of alum to control phosphorus,
detention basins to control sediment and fecal coliforms,
and source controls such as construction of structures to
control farm animal wastes in the lake watershed. The
capsule reports are entitled:
Restoration of Medical Lake (Washington)
Restoration of Lake Temescal (California)
Lake Restoration in Cobbossee Watershed (Maine)
These reports can be obtained by filling out the order form
at the back of this Newsletter with the appropriate boxes
checked #2025 (Medical Lake); #2026 (Lake Temescal);
#2027 (Cobbossee), and returning the form to CERI.
EPA Active I/A Program
The Clean Water Act of 1977 and the regulations which
implement it encourage the use of innovative and alterna-
tive (I/A) technologies as solutions to municipal
wastewater and sludge management needs. Special
emphasis is given to technologies that conserve or recover
energy, reduce total costs, reclaim or reuse water, recycle
wastewater constituents, or eliminate surface discharges.
The current I/A technology program officialy began on
October 1, 1978, and re-oriented the EPA Construction
Grants Program to fund a greater number of these I/A
technologies. In addition to requirements such as
mandatory consideration of I/A solutions m planning
future facilities, a number of positive incentives are
provided. These include increased federal construction
grant assistance for I/A technologies and 100 percent
federal grants to correct or replace I/A technology failures.
By fiscal year 1981, it is anticipated that one out of four
-------
EPA grant projects will involve I/A technology to some
degree However, many states are presently having
difficulty identifying a sufficient number of appropriate I/A
technology projects to fully utilize the funds specifically set
aside by Congress for this purpose.
In accordance with EPA Administrator Douglas Costle's
directive, the Agency has initiated an "active" I/A
technology program in order to encourage greater use of
I/A technologies and to generate more I/A projects. EPA
staff and organizations dedicated to the active I/A program
include Gary R. Lubm, MERL-Cmcinnati (51 3/684-7630)
and Robert P. G. Bowker, MERL-Cincmnati (513/684-
7620); Curtis Harlan, Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory-Ada, Oklahoma (405/743-2212)
This new I/A program effort is a necessary addition to
actions which EPA has already undertaken, such as
establishment of state and regional I/A coordinators, (see
attached list), the development of an I/A Technology
Assessment Manual, the presentaton of special I/A
program seminars across the nation, and the formation of
an I/A technology clearinghouse and technical support
group to help disseminate information and to assist m
review of I/A project applications.
The active I/A technology program is a joint effort of the
EPA Construction Grants and Research and Development
Programs The overall thrust of this program is to:
• Identify recently developed "emerging" I/A
technologies ready for implementation
• Identify and recommend project sites throughout
the country that can potentially benefit from
emerging technologies
• Assist local communities and their consulting
engineers with assessment and analysis of
emerging technologies that may be applicable to
their specific wastewater treatment control or
management problems
• Provide consulting engineers with detailed
planning and engineering assistance on a project-
by-project basis.
• Assist regional and state I/A coordinators in
developing active I/A projects by reviewing
priority project planning information and recom-
mending new technologies to be considered.
A special emphasis of the active I/A technology program is
to provide direct technical and administrative EPA assis-
tance to municipalities in the actual development of I/A
projects at the local level The EPA is working closely with
local and state governments, public participation groups,
consultants, and equipment manufacturers in this new
effort. Since the successful development of I/A projects
depends on the attitudes of these groups, we try to work
individually, on a one-to-one basis, to promote
cooperation
Two examples of active I/A projects which show promise
are located in Montrose, Colorado, and Hanover, New
Hampshire The EPA has been working with the city of
Montrose and the consulting firm of Roy F. Weston and
VTR, Inc to investigate the application of a vertical tube
chemical reactor method of treatment to treat 3 23 mgd of
a raw municipal/industrial high strength waste. The
Montrose project reached another milestone on July 24,
1 980 when a field test using a 1700 ft.-deep test well was
conducted in order to verify a laboratory treatability model.
Preliminary results from the facility plan indicate that this
unique application of deep well chemical oxidation signifi-
cantly exceeds the innovative technology cost and energy
qualifying criteria. This technology also exhibits significant
potential for treating municipal sludge while generating
energy.
In New Hampshire, the EPA has been working closely with
the city of Hanover, the state, and the consulting firms of
Hoyle and Tanner and J. I Associates in the proposed use
of an anaerobic expanded-bed fixed-film process to treat
2 mgd of domestic primary effluent. Review of the process
indicates significant cost and energy savings over a
conventional alternative. In general, anaerobic systems
are receiving renewed attention as a cost and energy
efficient method of treating domestic wastewaters The
city of Hanover is pursuing a facility planning revision and
work on a design report for this process. In a departure
from a business as usual approach, the EPA will be one
member of a joint design review team and will provide
direct aid in the further development of this process as it is
undergoing full-scale design. In the implementation of the
Montrose and Hanover projects, EPA will also be encour-
aging sole source procurement and patent exemptions in
accordance with recently issued policy directives in these
areas. Construction would be initiated under an extended
I/A program
Also, as part of the active I/A effort, a number of 40 to 60-
page emerging technology assessment reports are being
completed and distributed in ordertodisseminate informa-
tion on recent advances in the field of waste-water
treatment. In selected technologies, the emerging
technology assessment report describes, the stage of
development including pilot, demonstration and full-scale,
state-of-the-art; cost and energy benefits; technology gaps
that must be filled, and present and potential impact on the
industry Assessment reports which have been completed
or are near completion include overland flow, vertical tube
reactor, anaerobic upflow expanded bed, deep shaft
technologies, and solar applications in the treatment of
wastewater and sludge. Additional assessment reports
will address anaerobic biological nutrient removal
processes, aquaculture, wetlands, dual sludge digestion,
solvent extraction, sequencing batch reactors, heat pump
energy recovery, energy conserving materials and design,
air-to-air heat exchange, and hydro and wind energy
generation
-------
8
Future activities of the active I/A program include a series
of ten seminars on emerging technology to be held during
October, November, and December in Boston, New York,
Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City,
Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle. The Water and Waste-
water Equipment Manufacturers Association is
sponsoring the seminars with EPA as a cooperating
agency.
A similar prototype emerging technology seminar was
recently held in Boston in cooperation with the Consulting
Engineers of New England Due to the initial success of this
effort, the EPA hopes to continue to work with the
American Consulting Engineers Council in this and other
areas. A second round of ten I/A technology workshops is
being planned and will include energy analysis and I/A
case studies
In order to find out more about the active I/A program or
the I/A program m general, contact one of the federal
representatives listed here.
Contact
Lam K. Lim
USEPA, WH-547
Washington, DC 20460
John Smith/Gary Lubin/
Bob Bowker
USEPA, MERL
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Curtis Harlm
Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory
PO. Box 1198
Ada, OK 74820
Natalie Taub
USEPA, Region I
JFK Building
Boston, MA 02203
FTS
Commercial
426-8976 202/426-8976
684-7611
684-7630
684-7620
513/684-7611
513/684-7630
513/684-7620
743-2212 405/743-2212
223-5604 617/223-5604
Steve Veda
USEPA, Region II
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10007
James Hagan
USEPA, Region III
Curtis Building
6th & Walnut Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Tom Plouff
USEPA, Region IV
345 Courland Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
Steven Poloncsik
USEPA, Region V
230 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
Ancil Jones
USEPA, Region VI
First International Bldg.
1201 Elm Street
Dallas, TX 75270
Lynn Harrington
USEPA, Region VII
324 E. 11th Street
Kansas City, MO 64106
Stan Smith
USEPA, Region VIII
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, CO 80203
Irving Terzich
USEPA, Region IX
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Carl Nadler
USEPA, Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
264-9596 212/264-9596
597-9131 215/597-9131
257-4015 404/881-4015
353-2314 312/353-2314
729-2845 214/767-2845
758-2725 816/374-2725
327-2735 303/837-2735
556-8316 415/556-8316
399-1266 206/442-1266
-------
9
Where to Get Further Information
In order get details on items appearing in this publication, or any other aspects of the
Technology Transfer Program, contact the following individual in your region.
REGION CHAIRMAN ADDRESS REGION CHAIRMAN
1 Allyn Richardson Environmental Protection Agency 6 Information Center
John F Kennedy Federal Building
Room 2313
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
617/223-2226
(Maine, N H., Vt., Mass, R.I, Conn.)
2 Robert Bongiovanni Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza, Room 907 7 Charles Hajiman
New York, New York 10007
212/264-0711
(N Y., N J, PR, VI)
3 Albert Montague Environmental Protection Agency
6th & Walnut Streets 8 Dennis Nelson
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
215/597-9856
(Pa , W.Va , Md , Del, D C , Va )
4 Carolyn Mitchell Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N E 9 Information Center
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
404/881-4216
(N C , S C., Ky., Tenn., Ga., Ala ,
Miss , Fla )
5 Clifford Risley Environmental Protection Agency 10 John Osborn
536 South Clark Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
312/353-3805
(Mich , Wis , Minn , III., Ind , Ohio)
ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Public Awareness
1201 Elm Street
First International Building
Dallas, Texas 75270
214/767-2697
(Texas, Okla., Ark., La., N Mex )
Environmental Protection Agency
324 East 11 th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64106
816/374-2921
(Kansas, Nebr, Iowa, Mo.)
Environmental Protection Agency
1860 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
303/837-4261
(Colo , Mont., Wyo , Utah, N D., S.D.)
Environmental Protection Agency
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
415/556-1840
(Calif , Ariz , Nev., Hawaii)
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
206/442-1296
(Wash., Ore., Idaho, Alaska)
USEPA - ORD
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati. OH 45268
•513/684-7562
•This is a new telephone number.
-------
REQUEST FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER MATERIAL
The publications listed on this form are the only ones available through the Office of Technology Transfer.
(Check appropriate boxes)
PROCESS DESIGN MANUALS
Phosphorus Removal (April 1976) ...
Carbon Adsorption (Oct 1973) .
Suspended Solids Removal (Jan 1975)
Upgrading Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants (Oct 1974) .
Sulfide Control in Sanitary Sewerage Systems (Oct 1974)
Nitrogen Control (Oct 1975)
Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater (Oct 1977) .
Wastewater Treatment Facilities for Sewered Small
Communities (Oct 1977) . . ...
Municipal Sludge Landfills (Oct 1978) . ...
Sludge Treatment and Disposal (Oct 1979) . ...
• Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems (Oct 1980)
TECHNICAL CAPSULE REPORTS
Color Removal from Kraft Pulping Effluent by Lime Addition . . .
First Progress Report Limestone Wet-Scrubbing Test Results at the
EPA Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility
Pollution Abatement in a Brewing Facility
Flue Gas Desulfunzation and Sulfunc Acid Production via
Magnesia Scrubbing ... .
Second Progress Report Lime/Limestone Wet-Scrubbing Test
Results at the EPA Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility
Magnesium Carbonate Process for Water Treatment
Third Progress Report Lime/Limestone Wet-Scrubbing Test
Results at the EPA Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility
First Progress Report Wellman-Lord SO2 Recovery Process — Flue
Gas Desulfunzation Plant . . ...
Swirl Device for Regulating and Treating Combined
Sewer Overflows . ......
Fabric Filter Paniculate Control on Coal-Fired Utility Boilers
Nucla, CO and Sunbury, PA .. . ...
First Progress Report Static Pile Composting of Wastewater Sludge .
Efficient Treatment of Small Municipal Flows at Dawson, MN
Double Alkali Flue Gas Desulfunzation System Applied at the
General Motors Parma, OH Facility
Recovery of Spent Sulfunc Acid from Steel Pickling Operations
Fourth Progress Report Forced-Oxidation Test Results at the EPA
Alkali Scrubbing Test Facility ...
Control of Acidic Air Pollutants by Coated Baghouses
Particulate Control by Fabric Filtration on Coal-Fired Industrial Boilers
Banco Flue Gas Desulfunzation and Paniculate Removal System .
First Progress Report Physical Coal Cleaning Demonstration at
Homer City, PA . . .
Acoustic Monitoring to Determine the Integrity of Hazardous
Waste Dams . . .
• Restoration of Medical Lake (Washington)
• Restoration of Lake Temescal (California) .
• Lake Restoration in Cobbossee Watershed (Maine)
INDUSTRIAL SEMINAR PUBLICATIONS
Upgrading Poultry Processing Facilities to Reduce Pollution (3 Vols )
Upgrading Meat Packing Facilities to Reduce Pollution (3 Vols )
Upgrading Textile Operations to Reduce Pollution (2 Vols ) ..
Choosing the Optimum Financial Strategies for Pollution Control
Systems.
Erosion and Sediment Control — Surface Mining in the
Eastern U S (2 Vols ) . .
Pollution Abatement in the Fruit and Vegetable Industry (3 Vots ) .
Choosing Optimum Management Strategies
Controlling Pollution from the Manufacturing and Coating of
Metal Products (3 Vols ) . .
Pollution Control in the Forest Products Industry
1001 0
1002 D
1003 a
1004 D
1005 D
1007 D
1008 D
1009 D
1010 D
1011 n
1012 a
2002 a
2004 a
2006 a
2007 a
2008 a
2009 D
2010 D
2011 a
2012 D
2013 a
2014 O
2015 n
2016 D
2017 D
2018 D
2020 D
2021 D
2022 D
2023 d
2024 D
2025 D
2026 D
2027 Q
3001 n
3003 a
3004 U
3005 D
3006 D
3007 D
3008 n
3009 n
3010 D
MUNICIPAL SEMINAR PUBLICATIONS
Upgrading Lagoons . 4001 D
Status of Oxygen/Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment .... 4003 D
Nitrification and Demtnfication Facilities ... . 4004 D
Upgrading Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants — Case Histories . 4005 D
Flow Equalization 4006 D
Wastewater Filtration 4007 D
Physical-Chemical Nitrogen Removal 4008 D
Air Pollution Aspects of Sludge Incineration . ... . 4009 D
Sludge Treatment and Disposal (2 Vols ) 401 2 D
Benefit Analysis for Combined Sewer Overflow Control . . ... 4013 D
BROCHURES
Logging Roads and Water Quality 5011 D
Environmental Pollution Control Alternatives Municipal Wastewater . 5012 D
Forest Harvesting and Water Quality 501 3 D
Irrigated Agriculture and Water Quality Management 5014 D
Forest Chemicals and Water Quality. . 5015 D
Environmental Pollution Control Economics of Wastewater
Alternatives for the Electroplating Industry .. 5016 D
HANDBOOKS
Monitoring Industrial Wastewater (1973) 6002 D
Industrial Guide for Air Pollution Control (June 1978) 6004 D
Continuous Air Pollution Source Monitoring Systems (June 1979) .. 6005 D
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL
POLLUTION CONTROL MANUALS
Pulp and Paper Industry — Part 1/Air (Oct 1976) 7001 D
Textile Processing Industry (Oct 1978) 7002 n
SUMMARY REPORTS
Sulfur Oxides Control Technology Series FGD Wellman-Lord Process 8001 O
Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry
Series Evaporators 8002 O
• Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry
Series Sulfide Precipitation ... 8003 n
EXECUTIVE BRIEFINGS
Environmental Considerations of Energy — Conserving Industrial
Process Changes . . . 9001 D
Environmental Sampling of Paraho Oil Shale Retort Process . . 9002 D
Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens, Mutagens and Other Genotoxic
Agents .. ... . . 9003 D
Diesel Emissions Research Report . . , ... 9004 D
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND
TECHNOLOGY PUBLICATIONS
• Environmental Regulations and Technology
The Electroplating Industry ... . 10001 D
ATTENTION PUBLICATION USERS
Due to the increasing costs of printing and mailing, it has become necessary to institute positive management controls over distribution of Technology Transfer
publications Although these publications will be distributed on a no-cost basis, any request for more than five documents total, or for more than one copy of a
single document must be accompanied by written justification, preferably on organization letterhead In the event your order cannot be filled as requested, you
will be contacted and so advised
If you are not currently on the mailing list for the Technology Transfer Newsletter, do you want to be added? Yes D No D
*Name __^__ .
Employer
Street . -
City, State, Zip Code
*lt is not necessary to fill in this block if your name and address on reverse are correct.
• Publication listed for the first time
Note: Forward to CERI, Technology Transfer, U S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45266
,' US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OfFICE 1980-657-165/0112
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Third-Class
Bulk Rate
U&K
------- |