AN ASSESSMENT OF RAT PROBLEMS AND
                   ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
                                  IN THE
                          CITY OF GARY, INDIANA
                                JUNE 1971

                           BY GEORGE B. ELDER
            DHEW REGION V ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION CONSULTANT
This assessment was made at the request of Mr. John Lawshe, Executive

Assistant to the Gary Health Commissioner, Dr. Herschel Bornstein.


The following Gary Health Department staff assisted in the field survey,

and provided valuable insight into local rat problems and related environ-

mental conditions:

         Mrs. Helen Bogdanich

         Mr. Barry Clodig

         Mrs. Delores Harrison

         Mrs. Sandra Holeman

         Mr. Thomas Moeglin

         Mr. Leo Pilla

         Mr. Edward Plesko


Gary is a steel producing center, located at the southern tip of Lake

Michigan, and has a population of 178,000.  Dwelling units are primarily

single, detached, owner-occupied, although low-rise multiple dwellings are

scattered throughout the city.  Blocks generally have from 15 to 30 premises

per block and unpaved, drive-through alleys.  Newer subdivisions do not have

alleys, and occasional existing alleys are not in use and overgrown with

weeds .

-------
                                   - 2 -



The purpose of this assessment was to determine the extent of rat infesta-




tions, appraise related premises sanitation, reflect present rat control



activities, and make recommendations for improvement to the Gary Health




Department.  A total of 83 randomly distributed blocks were selected



throughout the entire city to give a representative sample of all neighbor-




hoods and socio-economic areas.  The citizens of Gary were friendly and




cooperative, thus permitting easy access to the premises.  An average of




15 premises on each block was inspected with a total of 1,258 premises




actually surveyed.  Ihe sewer system was not examined because local health




officials indicated that a. significant sewer rat infestation did not exist




and no rat infestations were observed near inlet structures.






The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) is the most common domestic rat, and




all rat signs observed in Gary were typical of that species.  Common names




for the Norway rat are the sewer rat, the brown rat, the wharf rat, and the




barn rat.  Adults generally weigh about one pound, and attain a, length of




approximately 17 inches from head to tip of tail.  The length of life




averages about one year.  A single female may produce approximately 37




young in one year.  Ihe rat, essentially a ground burrowing animal, usually



lives in colonies outside buildings, although it may enter homes if at-



tracted by food and openings exist.






It is difficult, if not impossible, to accurately count the number of in-




dividual rats in an entire city.  Populations fluctuate considerably,




depending upon the availability of harborage, food, and tolerance by man.




The number of premises infested, however, can be determined by inspection.




Premises were jooged positive if active rat signs were observed during the

-------
                                   - 3 -



survey.  Burrows, the most common sign, have freshly excavated or hard-



packed soil near the entrances when in use.  Other signs include fresh rat



feces, fresh gnawing, tracks and runways (rat paths), rubmarks,  and live or



dead rats.  Occasional signs of wild rodents, such as field mice, were ob-



served in wooded areas and vacant lots.



Ihe results of the sample exterior survey (see figures 1 through 3, pages



9 - U)indicate that:



    1.  A significant rat problem exists in the City of Gary and may be



        expected to increase.  Rat infestations were observed on at least



        13% of the premises in Midtown, while Gary-West (Tollerton and



        Brunswick) and the "small farms" area along 25th Street support



        large rat populations.



    2.  Rat infestations are primarily associated with poor premises



        sanitation, unsatisfactory refuse storage, poor housing conditions,



        and low socio-economic status.



    3«  Considerable refuse storage and collection problems exist through-



        out the city.



    4.  The Health Department is inadequately staffed and funded to provide



        needed environmental improvements.



Rat food is plentiful throughout the City of Gary.  Exposed garbage is avail-



able to rats on at least four out of ten premises in the Midtown area.  On-



premises refuse burning was observed on at least three out of ten premises,



and "cooked" garbage oftentimes remained in the burner.  Most garbage cans



either lacked covers or had poorly fitted covers.  Many instances of



scattered refuse on the ground were evident.  Approximately 20$ of the



premises had fewer than the recommended number of containers (2) on premises.

-------
                                   - k -



The rat requires protection and hiding places, commonly referred to as



harborage.  Seven key items are important as harborage and were recorded



during the survey.  These items should "be removed to successfully control



rats:



    1.  Abandoned automobiles are an eyesore, provide rat harborage, and



        tend to attract other refuse items.  The chart on page 9 indicates



        those premises which have one or more abandoned automobiles.



    2.  Abandoned appliances offer protection to rats and should not re-



        main on the premises when no longer useful to the occupant.



    3.  Lumber strewn about or stacked on the ground is stored improperly.



        Lumber accumulations of more than one cubic yard and stored less



        than 12 inches off the ground were recorded.



    k.  "Other large rubbish" refers to large trash items not placed in



        garbage cans but scattered over the yard.  Examples are tires,



        rubble, furniture, and dead plant material.



    5-  Dilapidated outbuildings that provide harborage and contain rubbish



        were recorded.  Well-maintained structures were not recorded.



    6.  Dilapidated board fences and walls were noted.



    7.  Weeds and grass more than 12 inches high, especially near garbage



        storage sites and structures, provide harborage for rats and hide



        refuse and rat burrows.  Alleys generally were poorly maintained,



        and weeds, grass and rubbish were commonly observed.



Rat-bite cases are seldom reported, and accurate records are not maintained



for the city.  No estimates were available at the time of this survey.  Rat



bites create a serious health problem and usually occur among helpless



infants and defenseless older persons.

-------
                                   - 5 -



The Health Department has prepared an annual map of rat, housing, garbage




and illegal dumping complaints for 1970-  The complaints received substanti-




ate the sample survey results.  However, it appears that citizens may confuse




the destructive Norway rat with pest mice and native wild rodents in neigh-




borhoods containing numerous vacant lots and other undeveloped land.






Refuse collection is scheduled twice weekly and is picked up from the alley




in most neighborhoods.  It is reported to be collected four times weekly in




the Model Neighborhood.  The frequency appears adequate, partly due to the




on-premises volume reduction (burning) practiced by the residents.  As in




most cities, the garbage cans are abused by the garbage collection crews




and residents.  The city does not provide adequate collection service of




large rubbish.  General Services currently has only two trucks collecting




rubbish and other large discarded items.  A minimum of ten is necessary to




provide scheduled systematic collection for the city.






Refuse collection is financed out of general corporate funds.  The refuse




is disposed of in an abandoned open-pit sand mine located in western Gary.




Private citizens are not charged if they bring refuse to the dump site.



Many illegal dumps exist in the city in undeveloped swampy areas and vacant



lots.






The Health Department rat control and residential sanitation budget is very




small, and no systematic rat control program is presently carried out.  The




sanitarian responds to complaints, and sometimes provides anticoagulants




upon request.  Neighborhood Youth Corps youngsters assigned to the Health




Department are involved in limited rat control during the summer months.

-------
                                   - 6 -



Glen Park and the eastern portion of Gary are relatively rat-free,  and al-



though generally well maintained, the data indicate poor refuse storage



and many instances of rat harborage.






The Model Neighborhood is visually depressing, with abandoned buildings



and automobiles, littered streets and alleys, vacant lots overgrown with



weeds, and supports a considerable rat infestation.  At least one in four



premises inspected showed evidence of active rat infestations.  A colony



living on one premises may spread to adjoining premises and thus have a



detrimental effect upon the entire neighborhood.   This important aspect



of the urban environment appears to have been given a low priority in the



past.  It is encouraging to note that a general cleanup of the Model



Neighborhood is planned.  The Health Department and Model Neighborhood



staff have an opportunity to make considerable progress in improving the



appearance of the area and attack the rat problem.






The following recommendations are made regarding the rat problems in Gary:



    1.  A systematic rat control program should be  implemented to eliminate



        rats in Gary, and directed primarily towards infestations in Midtown,



        Tollerton, and Brunswick neighborhoods, and should include:



        A.  A systematic comprehensive inspection of the entire area.



        B.  Reduction of the rat population inside  and outside buildings



             by poisoning.



        C.  Ratproofing to prevent entry of rodents into buildings.



        D.  Elimination of rat harborage and food supplies through neigh-



            borhood cleanup programs and improvements in refuse storage



            and collection.

-------
                               - 7 -



    E.  Spot clearance of dilapidated buildings in cooperation with




        other community redevelopment programs.




    F.  Development and enforcement of adequate codes and ordinances




        pertaining to refuse storage and control,  general premises




        sanitation and housing.




    G.  Training and employment of residents of rat infested areas.




    H.  Employment of a qualified vector control consultant to direct




        program activities.




2.  A community-wide information and education program is needed to




    inform the citizens about the rat and its dangers.  Residents must




    be totally involved to successfully control rats and improve the




    urban environment.




3.  On-premises burning of refuse should be banned.




k.  All rat bites should be reported to the Health Department.




5.  The Health Department should promote a city ordinance requiring




    the rat-proofing of all structures and removal of high weeds and




    grass.




6.  Inter-departmental cooperation and participation through staff  con-




    ferences and joint projects should be improved among agencies



    directly involved in environmental programs.  For example:  DHUD




    provides funds to city agencies for rat control under its con-



    centrated code enforcement and redevelopment programs.

-------
                                   - 8 -



                                References



Bjornson, Bayard P., H. D. Pratt, and K. S.  Littig:   Control of Domestic



Rats and Mice, PHS Publication 563, 1969






Fehn, Clyde F., Appraisal of Rat Problems in the City of Omaha, Nebraska,




1967





Littig, Kent S., et al, Urban Rat Surveys, 1971

-------
-  9  -











•d
& 3 to
g w

HOE
3 *rl u)
CO -P £i
J^-p1*
V ra >>
P 
•H
O


2t
-P
•H
a-
H
4) •
-d o
2. &
s

* .
rM %^4
0)
-P
6 •











ON

CO CO O
CO UN rH
CM r-l
O



VO O
H

r-l
V

CVI rH
UN
rH




ON


VO CVI
CM


UN
CM




F- ON
t- rH



00
rH
-d" UN
I- CO
VO




i3 w
CU G
-d rH Q)
V Qi Ti
H & CO
Qj ^
H CO 4^
cn w p^
"W CO 

-d
1
Tj
§
t--

C\J
OO

H



CM


UN

CO






VO


VO
rH



CO





VO



CO

VOy


CO
CU
o
•H
rH
ft
"^*

•8
§
•d

VO

ON
t*™

rH



CM


OO
H

ON
rH





-*


rH
rH



^





UN



f^ —

j-j:





-d
2
e>

§
f-<

•§
o
CM
^?
^p
CM
t-



i-H
rH


rH
H

f —
rH





ON
H


i-H
UN



VO
CO




CO
CM



UN
CVI
VD
rH




A
•H
O
^iQ
K
Q)
W)
VO

UN
t*~

o



o


ON

^J-
rH





UN


CO
H



CO





VO



t* —

S

CO
ftp
£J
$
I r-H
•d
cu
•H
ft
C?
r-H
CO

ON
OO

rH



rH


"*

VO






oo


CO



_.,.





oo



f^t"

CM


to
rH
•d
S:
08
CQ
CU
CJ
1
^
1
CM
CM
OO
CO
CVI
o
r-H


rH


O
CM

rH
CO





i-H
CM


r-



ON
OO




O
CO



VO
CVI
00
H




CQ
CQ
1


•d
§
CO
'g
                                                                              0)
                                                                             •H
                                                                             -P
                                                                             •H
                                                                             O
                                                                              o
                                                                              c

-------
                                                  - 10 -
c\j
•H
      CO
     •d
     
                                                                                                  o   45  13  fi o>
                                                                                                  PP   o  as  ftH
                                                                                                      -P  0)    ft

                                                                                                  "S      -p  § §
                                                                                                  o   ,13  aJ  oj to

                                                                                                  "C      to  -P -P
                                                                                                  fl)   nH  M  C 05
                                                                                                  R   tJ  ft -H
                                                                                                      C     O 13
                                                                                                      •H  0)  ft V
                                                                                                  I       ?•    -P
                                                                                                      h  -H  0) t>
                                                                                                      0)  -P rH V


                                                                                                  II   1st!
                                                                                                  11   a  ft  to -H

-------
- 11 -
Figure 3




' Unapproved Refuse Storage
sgory and Neighborhood
Gary, Indiana*
June 1971
Midtown
Total** Model Cities
^ *
266 36
110 22
173 2k
2k 3
106 17
k3 k
Gary Gary
West South
165 166
82 ^3
28 17
39 5^
7 6
38 11
15 7
Totals
757
391
155
266
37
155
65
  Number of premises with
  Unapproved refuse Storage
  Indicated by category***

  Containers not rat-tight or
  improperly used

  Insufficient number of
  containers

  Refuse burning

  Large drums in use

  Refuse scattered on ground

  Platform under containers
  •^Categories not recorded in Gary-East

 **Including Model Cities

***Premises may have one or more reasons for unapproved refuse storage

-------