United States Office Of The Regional February 1979
Environmental Protection Administrator
Agency 230 South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60604
REGION V
&EPA
State
Information
System
-------
SIS UPDATE
LOG
MONTH JULY
MINNESOTA
YEAR 1979
(state)
Last UPDATE Issued In:
PART I
Environmental Agencies
Executive Branch
Legislative Branch
Agencies, Commissions
and Boards
Public Interest Groups
State Environmental
Legislation
PART II
Regional Program Staff
PART III
GRANT ^TATTJ RFJPnpT
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV A GRANTS /APPL
FEE
MARCH
APRII
MAY
JUNE
JULY
1
?-4fl
5-8
9-11
2
-8
AUC
SEP"
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
File at beginning of the appropriate state section, replacing previous log.
JUL 1979
-------
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
MN I 1
CM
V.iieipcf Pern'M
ndv itnol Permit s
Agricultural Pei mit*
edging Certification
FACILITIES
J/^nfctpal Plans
Industrial Plans
Opera lions
Construction Grants
Operation Csrtifi cation
Compliance Inspection*
OIV1SIOII SERVICES
E1S Coordination
Administrative Servictt
Oota Processing
303E-005JD P.'ans
203-Areawirie Ptons
Environmental Planning
SURFACE AMD GROUrOV'ATERS
Wafer Quality Inventory
Won it or ing
Oosln Surveys
LaKa Survey*
CiforccM«nt Acllon
Spill!
Haot and Powtr
Chcmtcai Industries
Process Pianl 2 Grain
Metal Processing
Source Tct
I SOUO WASTE I
I DIRECTOR f~"
J ASSISTANT
| 0!P£CTOa
ijrvet'.anct
j 'rspuctron
i ! Aicndof.»i Motor j , Tc:,-,,-.i;ci *»;; if-.xs
{;r;.c.:r"ci""«'-' i cr,.-,;c., LC.-I^^ \ >-:,: A,:...
' ' "" ; . r"cc...ly ':'.: ' '
i 5:cra "s^jurcB
;.i«=;3ry P'or.n,,
I
a.-,.- i.strsM.i
2/79
-------
MN I 2
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road B-2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Administration
Exec- Director
Sr. Admin Eng.
Adm. Secretary
Deputy Exec. Director
Adm. Services Director
Operations
Personnel.
Asst» Exec. Director
Env. Analysis
Legislation
Public Info.
Legal
Asst.- Attorney General.
Division of: Air Quality
Div. Director
Tech Services Section
Engineering Section
Enforcement Section:
Noise Section
Planning Section
Division of Solid Waste
Di.w Director: (Acting)
Resource: Plan-. SecvS. D. D -
Permits Section
Enforcement. Section;
Hzd. Waste Section
612-296-
FTS-776-
Ms. Terry M. Hoffman
Clarence A. Johannes
Maryanne Gibbons
Lovell E~ Richie
John Klaus
John Retzer
Elaine Johnson
Jay- Hof f era
Dale McMichael
Robert Silvagni
Gail Gendler
Eldest (*. Kaul
Edward M. Wiik
Gary Eckhardt
Louis Chamberlain.
Gary Pulford
Alfonso E. Perez
Bradley J. Beckham
Louis Breimhurst
Curtis Sparks
Bruce Brott
Thomas Clark
James- Kinsey
7301
7200
7302
7303
7700
7701
7308
7305
7293
7711
7283
7341
7331
7333
7334
7371
7340
7265
7315
7729
7325
7395
7317
2/79
-------
MN I 3
Division of Water Quality
Div. Director
Asst. Director
(Acting)
Facilities Section
Compliance & Enf. Sec.
Surface & Ground Waters
Section
Permits Section
Planning Section
Barry Schade 7354
Barry Schade 7354
Perry Beaton 7201
John McGuire 7242
Timothy K. Scherkenbach 7236
Richard Svanda 7221
Paul Davis 7241
Regional Offices
REGION I - DULUTH
1015 Torrey Building
Duluth, MN 55802
REGION II - BRAINERD
615 Oak Street
Brainerd, MN 56401
REGION III - DETROIT LAKES
116 East Front Street
Detroit Lakes, MN 56501
REGION IV - MARSHALL
Southwest State University
Box 286
Marshall, MN 56258
REGION V - ROCHESTER
821 Third Avenue Southeast
Suite 65 - Kings Row Building
Rochester, MN 55901
John Pegors, Regional Director
(218) 723-4660
Larry Shaw, Regional Director
(218) 828-2492
Willis Mattison, Regional Director
(218) 847-2164
Larry Johnson, Regional Director
(507) 537-7146
Larry Landherr, Regional Director
(507) 285-7343
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA EXECUTIVE BRANCH
MN I 4
GOVERNOR
Albert H. Quie IR
State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Ms. Jean King
Executive Asst. to the Governor
FTS 8-776-3391
612-296-3391
8-776-3391
LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR
Lou Wangberg IR
122 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
FTS 8-776-2374
612-296-2374
SECRETARY OF
STATE
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
Joan Anderson Growe DFL
180 State Office Building
St.. Paul,MN 55155
Theresa Elizindo, Supervisor
Fiscal Operations Division
(Administers Receipts and
Budget Matters)
Warren Spannaus DLF
102 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Eldon G. Kaul, Asst. Attorney General
Provides legal support to Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 W. County Road B-2
Roseville, MN 55113
FTS 8-776-3266
612-296-3266
FTS 8-776-7976
612-296-7976
8-776-6196
612-296-6196
8-776-7341
612-296-7341
IR - Independent Republican Caucus
DFL- Democratic-Farmer-Labor
2/79
-------
MN -I 5a
EXECUTIVE BRANCH: DEPARTMENTS ANQ AGENCIES FLOWCHART
Function* of *fj* E*«cull»« SuncA
0«paiim«ni4
Agencies
XXJ-
i
If
0 «
t
1
1
^
n
g>
e
M
«
I
^
1
u>
^
a
C
f
O
|
c
0
s
I
c
sis
[~~
ll
i IndUnAI
| Intortub.
»^K«
J_
d on Agin)
MN Bo»r
f
I
e»
=
|
K
MNSoc
lion ol C
L J_
|
5
"a
a
o
a
C
'S
H
MN Co»<
ntnloiCofiicilon.
I
O
2/79
-------
MN I
5b
Departments There are 20 executive departments in slate government each
headed by a commissioner appointed by the governor.
Agencies Separate from departments, independent agencies
with portions ol membership appointed by the governor
function within state government.
Semi-State Agencies Separate from departments and other agencies
in stategovemment, semi-state agencies
are not under direct appointive control of the
governor. These are designated in this chart
by an asterisk (».
Hfillh
Scrvicvs
"c
£
a,
Q
a
Economic
Afl'icullui
si
a
5»
<
1 MN Stale
1 Society
g
si
M
*
cj n
C3
Iron Rang
and Reh.1
ions flo.ird
3
|
1 Cable Co
o
O
?
c
a
iir oi M
S
>
S
a
u
3
^
i
F
I Labor and Ind
*
o
I
Employmcnl ;
Council lor In
Handicapped
J
&
S
5
II
a
^
Oureauol
Mediation Sen
l^
1 Public Employ
Rotations GQ.I
2/79
-------
MN I 6
Minnesota State Congressional Delegation
U.S. Senators - United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Rudolph E. Boschwitz^ (IE.)
Plymouth; elected to Senate in. 1978
Plywood Manufacturer
Admin. Asst, Mr. Jann Olsten - 201-224-5641
Minnesota Officer 210 Bremer Bldg.
419 N. Robert St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
612-221-0904
David Durenberger (IR)
Minneapolis; elected to Senate in 1978
Practicing Attorney 1959-66; exec. secy, to Gov. Harold LeVander
1967-71; consel, corp. secy. H.B. Fuller Co. 1971-Present.
Admin Asst. Mr. George Thiss - 202-224-3244
Minnesota Office: Federal Courts Bldg.
110 S. 4th
Rnu 174
Minneapolis, MN
612-725-6111
U.S. Congressmen House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
First District - Arlen Erdahl (R)
West St. Paul; elected to Congress 1978; Farmer; served on staff
of two former congressmen; MN State Rep. 1963-70; MN Secy of State
1970-74; MN Public Service Commission 1975-78.
Admin Asst.. Mr. Keith Hall - 202-225-2271
33 Wentworth Ave.
West St. Paul, MN 55118
611-725-7716
704 Marquette Bldg.
Rochester, MN 55901
507-288-2384
2/79
-------
MN I 7
Second District - Thomas M. Hagedorn (R)
Truman; elected to Congress in 1974-Graln & Livestock farmer; MN
State Rep. 1970-74
Legislative Asst. - Paul Powell - 202-225-247Z
Minnesota, Offices: Room 202, Post Office Bldg.
P.O. Box 3148
Mankato, MN 56001
507-387-8226
211 So. Newton
P.O. Box 850
Albert Lea, MN 56007
507-377-1676
Third District - Bill Frenzel (R)
Golden Valley; elected to Congress in 1970-MN State Rep. 1962-70;
Past. Pres. Minneapolis Terminal Warehouse Co.
Aide for Env. Matters - Ed Spencer - 202-225-2871
Minnesota Offices: 110 South 4th St. 3601 Park Center Bldg.
Minneapolis,. MN 55401 St. Louis Park, MN 55416
612-725-2173 612-925-4540
Fourth District - Bruce F. Vento (DLF)
St. Paul; elected to Congress in 1976; Junior high teacher; State
Rep. 1970-76
Aide for Env. Matters Larry Romans - 202-225-6631
Minnesota Office: 544 Federal Courts Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55101
612-725-7869
Fifth District - Martin Qlav Sabo (DFL)
Minneapolis; elected to Congress in 1978
Aide for Env. Matters - Eileen Baum Gartner - 202-225-4755
Minnesota Office: 166 Federal Courts Building
110 S. 4th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
612-725-2081
2/79
-------
MN I 8
Sixth District - Richard Nolan (DFL)
Waite Park, elected to Congress in 1974; Former Asst. to Sen. Mondale
1966-68; MN State Rep 1968-72
Aide for Env. Matters - Stan Mahon - 202-225-2331
Minnesota Offices: 908 Germain St. Route 1, Box 88
St. Cloud, MN 56301 Maple Plain, MN 55359
612-252-7580 612-479-2331
Federal Office Bldg. 921 4th Ave.
Redwood Falls, 56283 Worthington, MN 56187
507-637-3565 507-376-4118
Seventh District - Arlan Stangeland (IR)
Bainesville, elected to Congress 2/22/77', MN State Rep. 1966-74;
Member of various Livestock Associations
Aide for Env. Matters - Cathy Powell - 202-225-2165
Minnesota Office: 613 Main Avenue
Moorhead, MN 56560
218-233-8631
Eight District - James L. Oberstar (DFL)
Chisolm; elected to Congress in 1974; Admin Asst. to John Blatnick
1961-70; Administrator of House Committee on Public Works 1971-74.
Aide for Air & Water Pollution - Mike Stone - 202-225-6211
Minnesota Office: Room 231, Federal Building
Duluth, MN 55802
212-727-7474
2/79
-------
MN I 9
s
§5 « -j
=
a
Sip*.
« e « o> w
"* < £ T =
ffl 13 ^ M <"
c «
U5 0^,7-0
S S S 3 | ..
01 o c := 2 i-
§§i-§|s
o
* *
r- ao
Q.
o
2/79
-------
MN 1
MINNESOTA
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 1979-80
State Senate Offices
State Capitol or
State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-2343
ETS 8-776-2343
Minnesota House of Representatives
State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-2146
FTS 8-776-2146
Senator
Anderson, Jerald C.
Ashbach, Robert 0.
Bang, Otto T., Jr.
Benedict, Robert M.
Bernhagen, John
Brataas, Nancy
Chenoweth, John C.
Chmielewski, Florian
Coleman, Nicholas D.
Davies, Jack
Dieterich, Neil
Dunn, Robert G.
Engler, Steve
Frederick, Mel
Gearty, Edward J.
Gunderson, Jerome 0.
Hanson, Marvin B.
Hughes, Jerome M.
Humphrey, Hubert H., Ill
Jensen, Carl A.
Johnson, Douglas J.
Keefe, John B.
Keefe, Steve
Kirchner, William G.
Kleinbaum, Jack I.
Knaak, Dee
Knoll, Franklin J.
Knutson, Howard A.
Laufenburger, Roger
Lessard, Bob
Lewis, B. Robert
Luther, William P.
McCutcheon, Bill
Menning, Marion (Mike)
Merriam, Gene
Moe, Roger D.
Nelson, Tom
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
19
48
39
38
22
33
66
14
65
60
62
18
25
32
54
35
1
50
44
28
6
40
59
37
17
49
61
53
34
3
41
45
67
26
47
2
31
North Branch
Arden Hills
Edina
Bloomington
Hutchinson
Rochester
St. Paul
Sturgeon Lake
St. Paul
Minneapolis
St. Paul
Princeton
Randolph
West Concord
Minneapolis
Mabel
Hallock
Maplewood
New Hope
Sleepy Eye
Cook
Hopkins
Minneapolis
Richfield
St. Cloud
White Bear Lake
Minneapolis
Burnsville
Lewiston
International Falls
St. Louis Park
Brooklyn Center
St. Paul
Edgerton
Coon Rapids
Ada
Austin
296-4184
4111
4122
8868
4131
4848
4172
4182
4196
4841
8867
4117
4103
4123
4174
8870
4835
4183
4180
4112
8881
4118
4190
4115
4173
9247
7196
4120
4181
4136
4166
8869
4129
4171
4154
2577
4871
2/79
-------
MN 1 11
Senators Cont'd.
Nichols, Jim
Ogdahl, Harmon T.
Olhoft, Wayne
Olson, Howard D.
Penny, Timothy J.
Perpich, George F.
Peterson, Collin C.
Pillsbury> George S.
Purfeerst, Clarence M.
Renneke, Earl W.
Rued, David
Schaaf, David D.
Schmitz, Robert J»
Schrom, Ed
Setzepfandt, A.O.K.
Sieloff, Ron
Sikorski, Gerry
Sillers, Douglas H.
Solon, Sam George
Spear, Allan H.
Staples, Emily Anne
Stokowski, Eugene E.
Strand, Roger E.
Stumpf, Peter P.
Tennessen, Robert J.
Ueland, Arnulf, Jr.
Ulland, James
Vega, Conrad M.
Wegener, Myrton 0.
Willet, Gerald L.
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
20
58
11
27
30
5
10
42
24
23
13
46
36
16
21
63
51
9
7
57
43
55
15
64
56
29
8
52
12
4
Lake Benton
Minneapolis
Herman
St. James
New Richland
Chisholm
Detroit Lakes
Wayzata.
Faribault
LeSueur
Brainerd
Fridley
Jordan
Albany
Bird Island
St. Paul
Stillwater
Moorhead
Duluth
Minneapolis
Plymouth
Minneapolis
Cyrus
St. Paul
Minneapolis
N. Mankato
Duluth
S. St. Paul
Bertha
Park Rapids
296-4474
4109
4178
4187
4165
4145
4135
4121
4167
4125
4179
7157
4840
8086
4310
4700
4119
4188
4191
4137
4192
4104
4193
8885
4105
4314
4101
4156
4147
2/79
-------
MN I 12
House of Representatives
Aasness, Paul
Adams, Leo
Ainley, John
Albrecht, Raymond
Anderson, Bob
Anderson, Bruce (Buzz)
Anderson, Delbert
Anderson, Glen
Anderson, Irvin
Battaglia, David
Begich, Joseph
Berglin, Linda
Berkelman, Thomas
Biersdorf, John
Blatz, Kathleen
Brinkman, Bernard
Byrne, Peggy
Carlson, Doug
Carlson, Lyndon
Casserly, James
Clark, Janet
Clawson, John
Corbid, John
Crandall, William
Dean, William
Dempsey, Terry
Den Ouden, Gaylin
Drew, John
Eken, Willis
Elioff, Dominic
Ellingson, Robert
Enefao, S tanley
Erickson, Wendell
Esau, Gilbert
Evans, Jim
Ewald, Douglas
Faricy, Ray
Fjoslien, David
Forsythe, Mary
Friedrich, Donald
Fritz, M.D. (Mike)
Fudro, Stanley
Greenfield, Lee
Halberg, Charles
Haukoos, M.R. (Bob)
Heap, Jim
Heinitz, O.J. (Lon)
Hoberg, Dwaine
Hokanson, Shirley
Jacobs, Joel
IR
DFL
IR
IR
IR
DFL.
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
IR
IB.
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
IR
IR
DFL
IR
IR
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
IR
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
11A
44B
4A
23A
10B
26A
15A
15B
3A
6B
6A
50A
8B
32A
38A
16B
64B
14A
44A
56A
60A
19A
IB
61A
58A
28B
21B
63B
2B
5A
45B
60S
26B
28A
10A
40A
63A
11B
39A
32B
62B
55A
57B
53B
31A
43B
43A
9A
37A
47A
Wendell 296-7974
New Hope 4345
Park Rapids 7432
Brownstown 4318
Ottertail 4946
Slayton 2068
Starbuck 3908
Bellingham 4228
International Falls 6251
Two Harbors 2190
5063
Minneapolis 4261
Duluth 2228
Owatonna 4332
Bloomington 4218
Richmond 4373
St. Paul 4245
Sandstone 4308
Brooklyn Center 4255
Minneapolis 4221
Minneapolis 4354
Center City 4358
Oklee 4329
Minneapolis 4127
Minneapolis 4337
New Ulm 9303
Prineburg 4346
St. Paul 8860
Twin Valley 4256
Virginia 0170
Brooklyn Center 3709
Minneapolis 4274
Hills 4336
Mountain Lake 4348
Detroit Lakes 4341
Minnetonka 4311
St. Paul 4267
Brandon 4317
Edina 4363
Rochester 4378
St. Paul 7450
Minneapolis 4377
Minneapolis 0173
Burnsville 4212
Albert Loa 8216
Robbinsdale 7026
Wayzata 4320
Moorhead 4066
Richfield 4239
Coon Rapids 4231
2/79
-------
MN I 13
House of Representatives Cont'd. 2
Jaros, Mike
Jennings, David
Johnson, Carl
Johnson, Dean
Jude, Tad
Kahn, Phyllis
Kaley, J.R. (Dick)
Kalis, Henry
Kelly, Randy
Kempe, Raymond
Knickerbocker, Gerald
Kostohryz, Richard
Kroening, Carl
Kvam, Adolph
Laidig, Gary
Lehto, Arlene
Levi, Connie
Long, Dee
Ludeman, Cal
Luknic, Mamie
Mann, George
McCarron, Paul
McDonald, Kenneth
McEachern, Bob
Mehrkens, Lyle
Metzen, James
Minne, Lona
Moe, Donald
Munger, Willard
Murphy, Mary
Nelsen, Bruce
Nelsen, Marlin B. (Doc)
Nelson, Ken I.
Niehaus, Joseph
Norman, Jim
Norton, Fred
Novak, Steven
Nysether, Myron
Olsen, Sally
Onnen, Tony
Osthoff, C. Thomas
Otis, Todd
Patton, Al
Pavlak, Robert
Pehler, James
Peterson, Bill
Piepho, Mark
Pleasant, Ray
Prahl, Norman
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
IR
IR
DFL
7B
27B
23B
21A
42A
57A
33A
30A
66B
53A
40B
SOB
54A
22A
51A
8A
50A
56B
20B
24B
27A
46A
36A
18B
25B
52A
5B
65B
7A
14B
12A
13B
59B
16A
6 IB
65A
48A
LA
41A
22B
64A
58B
17A
67A
17B
38B
29A
39B
3B
Duluth
Truman
St. Peter
Willmar
Mounds
Minneapolis
Rochester
Walters
St. Paul
W. St. Paul
Hopkins
N. St. Paul
Minneapolis
Litchfield
Stillwater
Duluth
Dellwood
Minneapolis
Tracy
Fairbault
Windom
Fridley
Watertown
St. Michael
Redwing
S. St. Paul
Hibbing
St.- Paul
Duluth
Hermantown
Staples
Aitkin
Minneapolis
Sauk Centre
Minneapolis
St. Paul
New Brighton
Roseau
St. Louis Park
Cokato
St. Paul
Minneapolis
Sartell
St. Paul
St. Cloud
Bloomington
Mankato
Bloomington
Grand Rapids
296-4246
3240
4270
3826
4248
4257
4359
4240
4277
4220
4315
4936
4302
4344
4351
2637
4124
0171
3825
4144
4292
4242
8872
4237
8075
4370
0172
4264
4282
2676
4352
4368
4244
4379
4126
5158
4334
3901
3964
1534
4224
9281
4216
4367
4241
4304
3248
4316
4225
2/79
-------
MN I
House of Representatives Cont'd 3
Redalen, Elton
Reding, Leo
Rees, Tom
Reif, Robert
Rice, James
Rose, John
Rothenberg, Elliot
Sarna, John
Schreiber, William
Searle, Rod
Searles, Robert
Sherwood, Glen
Sieben, Harry, Jr.
Sieben, Michael
Simoneau, Wayne
Stadum, Tony
Stoa, Tom
Stowell, Warren (Tom)
Sviggum, Steve
Swanson, James
Thiede, Paul
Tomlinson, John
Valan, Merlyn
Valento, Donald
Vanasek, Robert
Voss, Gordon
Waldorf, Eugene
Weaver, John
Welch, Richard
Welker, Ray
Wenzel, Stephen
Wieser, Al
Wigley, Richard
Wynia, Ann
Zubay, Kenneth
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DPI
IR
IR
DFL
IR
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
IR
DFL
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
DFL
DFL
IR
DFL
IR
53A
3 IB
36B
49B
54B
48B
41B
55B
45A
30B
42B
4B
52B
5 IB
46B
2A
34B
34A
25A
37B
13A
67B
9B
49A
24A
4-7B
66A
19B
ISA
20A
12B
35B
29B
62A
33B
Fountain
Austin
Elko
White Bear Lake
Minneapolis
Roseville
St. Louis Park
Minneapolis
Brooklyn Park
Waseca
Orono
Pine River
Hastings
Newport
Fridley
Ada
Winona
Lewiston
Nerstrand
Richfield
Pequot Lakes
St. Paul
Moorhead
Lit
New Prague
Blaine
St. Paul
Anoka
Cambridge
Montevideo
Little Falls
LaCrescent
Lake
St. Paul
Rochester
296-9278
4324
6926
8858
4262
4342
0169
4219
4128
4339
4309
4252
4227
4250
4331
8874
2709
3249
2273
4885
4338 *
4259
6829
7153
4229
4265
3809
3454
3821
8082
4247
4251
4355 '
3824
4340
2/79
-------
MK i 15
SENATE DISTRICTS -
HOUSE DISTRICTS-.
MINNESOTA LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS
approved by U.S. District Court J une 2,1972
2/79
-------
MN I 16
MINNESOTA
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSIBILITIES
MINNESOTA SENATE
Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee
Chairman: Willet
Vice Chairman: Schrom
Members t
Benedict Marxian Strand
Bernhagen Nichols Ulland
Dunn Olson Wegener
Engler Penny
Hanson Peterson
Lessard Renneke
Luther Setzepfandt
Commerce Committee
Chairman: Tennessen
Vice Chairman: Spear
Members;
Ashbach Johnson
Bang Kleinbaum
Borden Laufenburger
Braataas Penny
Davies Sikorski
Dieterich Solon
Jensen
Energy and Housing Committee
Chairman: Anderson
Vice Chairman; Knoll
Members:
Benedict Ogdahl
Bernhagen Olhoft
Chenoweth Sillers
Humphrey Staples
Menning Stumpf
Nelson Ulland
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA
SENATE (CONT.)
Governmental Operations Committee
Chairman: Chenoweth
Vice Chairman; Schaaf
Members;
Ashbach McCutcheon Renneke
Benedict Nelson Sikorski
Borden Nichols Stokowski
Kirchner Ogdahl Strand
Knoll Penny Ulland
Knutson Peterson Vega
Health, Welfare, and Corrections Committee
Chairman: Perpich
Vice Chairman: Solon
Members;
Brataas Knutson. Olhoft
Gunderson Lewis Sikorski
Keefe, J. Milton Staples
Kirchner Nelson Vega
Local Government Committee
Chairman: Wegener
Vice Chairman: Schmitz
Members
Benedict Menning Setzepfandt
Chmielewski Olhoft Ueland
Engler Renneke
Gunderson Schrom
Finance Committee
Chairman: Moe
Vice Chairman: Lewis
Members;
Anderson Keefe, S. Pillsbury
Ashbach Kirchner Purfeerst
Bordei1 Kleinbaum Renneke
Chenoweth Luther Solon
Dunn Menning Spear
Hughes Milton Stumpf
Humphrey Ogdahl Tennessen
Keefe, J. Perpich Willet
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA MN I 18
SENATE (CONT.)
Taxes and Tax Laws Committee
Chairman: McCutcheon
Vice Chairman: Olhoft
Members;
Bang Hanson Schaaf
Bernhagen Jensen Schrom
Chmielewski Johnson Setzepfandt
Davies Merriam Sillers
Dieterich Olson Stokowski
Frederick Peterson Wegener
Transportation Committee
Chairman: Purfeerst
Vice Chairman: Penny
Members;
Bang Kirchner Schmitz
Chmielewski Laufenfaurger Setzepfandt
Engler Lessard Sieloff
FEederick Lewis Vega
Gearty Schaaf
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA MMI 19
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES WITH ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES *
Agriculture Committee
Chairman: George L* Mann - DFL
Vice Chairman: Henry J. Kalis - DFL
Members;
Aasness - IR Erickson - IR Nelsen, M. - DFL
Albrecht - IR ' Johnson, C» - DFL Stowell - IR
Anderson, B. - DFL Kahn - DFL Sviggum - IR
Anderson, G. - DFL Ludeman - IR Valan - IR
Brinkman - DFL Luknic - IR Welch - DFL
Carlson, D. - IR McDonald - IR Wenzel - DFL
Eken -DFL Nelsen, B. - IR
Environment & Natural Resources Committee
Chairman: Willard M, Munger - DFL
Vice Chairman: Richard J. Kostohryz - DFL
Members:
Battaglia - DFL Lento - DFL Rose - IR
Begich - DFL Levi IR Sherwood - IR
Carlson, D., - IR Long - DFL Stadum - IR
Dean - IR Nelsen, M. - DFL Stowell - IR
Den Ouden IR Nysether IR Vanasek DFL
Ellingson - DFL Patton - DFL Weaver - DFL
Fjoslien - IR Peterson - IR
Jacobs - DFL Prahl - DFL
Commerce, Economic Development & Housing Committee
Chairman: John S. Bierdorf - IR
Vice Chairman: Douglas R. Ewald - IR
Members;
Adams - DFL Heap - IR Reding - DFL
Ainley - IR Jaros - DFL Sarna - DFL
Albrecht - IR Kroening - DFL Siefaen, M. - DFL
Anderson, G. - DFL Metzen - DFL Simoneau - DFL
Anderson, R. - IR Murphy - DFL Welder - IR
Forsythe - IR Olsen - IR Wieser - IR
Friedrich - IR Osthoff - DFL
Fudro - DFL Piepho - IR
* DFL - Democratic - Farmer Labor
IR - Independent Republican
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES * (CONT.)
MN I. 20
Energy & Utilities Committee
Chairman; Richard E. Wigley - IR
Vice Chairman: Donald L. Fredrich - IR
Members:
Ainley - IR
Carlson, D. IR
Clark - DFL
Corbid - DFL
Evans - IR
Ewald - IR
Greenfield - DFL
Jude - DFL
Kahn - DFL
Kaley - IR
Minne - DFL
Munger - DFL
Nelson, K^ - DFL
Nysether - IB.
Otis - DFL
Redalen - IR
Reding DFL
Rees - IR
Rothenberg IR
Stoa - DFL
Tomlinsou - DFL
Welker - IR
Appropriations Committee
Chairman: Fred C. Norton - DFL
Vice Chairman: Gordon 0. Voss - DFL
Members:
Anderson, D. - IR
Anderson, G. - DFL
Anderson, R.- IR
Berkelman - DFL
Corbid - DFL.
Dean - IR
Den Ouden - IR
Erickson - IR
Forsythe - IR
Haukoos - IR
Hokanson - DFL
Johnson, D. IR
Kahn - DFL
Kempe DFL
Laidig - IR
McCarron - DFL
Mehrkens - IR
Metzen DFL
Munger - DFL
Nelsen, B. - IB.
Osthoff - DFL
Plepho
Reif - IR
Rice - DFL
Sieben, M. - DFL
Stadum - IS.
Swanson - DFL
Valan - IR
Waldorf - DFL
Weaver - IR
Welch - DFL
Welker - IR
Wieser - IR
Wynia - DFL
* DFL - Democratic - Farmer Labor
Ir - Independent Republican
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES * (CONT.)
MM I 21
Governmental Operations Committee
Chairman: Stanley A» Enebo DFL
Vice Chairman: Al W. Pattern - DFL
Members;
Aasness IB.
Adams - DFL
Albrecht - IR
Battaglia - DFL
Biersdorf - IS.
Byrne - DFL
Clawson DFL
Heinitr - IB.
Kaley - IR
Kroening DFL
Ludeman IR
McDonald - IR
Minne - DFL
Moe DFL
Norman - IR
Pavlak - IR
Reding - DFL
Rees - IR
Rose - IR
Sarna - DFL
Simoneau - DFL
Stoa - DFL
Sviggum - IR
Stowell - IR
Wenzel - DFL
Wigley - IR
Health & Welfare Committee
Chairman: Joseph T. Niehaus - IR
Vice Chairman: John R. Kaley - IR
Membersr
Aasness - IR
Anderson, B, DFL
Berglin - DFL.
Berkelman DFL
Blatz - IR
Byrne - DFL
Clark - DFL
Clawson DFL
Crandall - IR
Drew - IR
Elioff - DFL
Enebo - DFL
Esau - IR
Greenfield - DFL
Heinitz - IR
Hokanson - DFL
Kvam IR
Onnen - IR
Reif - IR
Waldorf - DFL
Welch - DFL
Zufaay - IR
Local & Urban Affairs Committee
Chairman: Ray 0. Pleasant IR
Vice Chairman: David. 0» Fjoslien IR
Members;
Anderson, R. - IR
Berglin - DFL
Berkelman - DFL
Casserly - DFL
Clawson - DFL
Ellioff - DFL
Ellingson - DFL
Haukoos - IR
Hoberg - IR
Johnson, D. - IR
Kroening - DFL
Levi - IR
Long - DFL
McCarron - DFL
McEachern - DFL
Murphy - DFL
Pehler - DFL
Piepho - IR
Rees IR
Schreiber - IR
Searles - IR
Thiede - IR
Valento - IR
Waldorf - DFL
Weaver - IR
Wynia - DFL
* DFL - Democratic - Farmer Labor
IR - Independent Republican
2/79
-------
MINNESOTA
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES * (COOT.)
MN I 22
Taxes Committee
Chairman; Harry Sieben, Jr. - DFL
Vice Chairman: John D. Tomlinson - DFL
Members
Anderson, I. - DFL
Begich - DFL
Berglin - DFL
Blatz - IB.
Brinkman - DFL
Casserly - DFL
Denrpsey - IB.
Eken - DFL
Evans - IB.
Faricy - DFL
Fritz - IB.
Halberg - IB.
Jacobs - DFL
Jaros - DFL
Johnson, C. - DFL
Kvam - IB
Luknic - IB.
Novak - DFL
Onnen - IB
Pehler - DFL
Peterson - IK.
Pleasant IB,
Prahl - DFL
Rothenberg - IB
Schreiber - IR
Searle - IR
Searles - IR
Valento - IR
Vanasek - DFL
Transportation Committee
Chairman: Stanley J. Fudro - DFL
Vice Chairman: John J. Sarna - DFL
Members;
Adams - DFL
Dempsey IS
Den. Ouden - IB
Esau - IR
Friedrich - IR
Halberg - IR
Hokanson - DFL
Jacobs - DFL
Jude - DFL
Kalis - DFL
Kempe - DFL
Ludeman IB.
Luknic - IB.
Mann - DFL
McEachern - DFL
Mehrikens - IR
Nelsen, B. - IR
Novak - DFL
Patton - IR
Redalen - IR
Schreiber - IR
Thiede - IR
* DFL - Democratic - Farmer Labor
IB. Independent Republican
2/79
-------
MN I 23
Minnesota Substantive Legislation
The Governor's office develops and distributes general guidelines
for proposed legislation (i.e. no money bills will be entertained)
Most substantive environmental legislation is originated by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The executive director presents
the MPCA's suggested legislation to a legislative committee of the
MPCA Board. The board reviews this suggested package and makes any
modifications. The finalized legislative proposal is sent to the
Governor's office for review. The Agency's legislative package is
due to the Governor by October 1 of each year. The legislature meets
in January of every odd numbered year. In off years there is a mini
session.
If the proposed legislation receives a no from the Governor's office,
the proposal is dropped. If the Governor's review gives the go ahead
it will proceed through the legislative process. A sponsor for a. bill
may be suggested by the MPCA or by the Governor's office. The
Governor's staff may meet with their party leaders and divide up the
legislation. The legislative leadership usually decides who will
sponsor a bill.
Environmental bills can be introduced into either the House or the
Senate. If introduced in the House it goes to the Environment and
Natural Resources Committee, Chairman, Willard Hunger. If introduced
in the Senate it goes to the Natural Resources and Agriculture Commi-
ttee, Chairman, Gerald L. Willet.
The Assistant Director, MPCA follows the bill through the legislative
process (see attached flow chart). When a bill is approaching final
approval in the House or the Senate MPCA is usually solicited to
testify. Some changes can be made at this time.
Once legislation passes both houses it goes to the Attorney General
for a review of its constitutionality. Bill then goes to Governor's
office for signature. If the Governor does veto the bill, the MPCA
will not solicite support to override the veto.
2/79
-------
Minnesota - Substantive Legislation
MN I 23a
Governor's Office
Guidance
MPCA Prepares
Proposals
due Oct. 1 each year
revisions
Review by MPCA
Board - Legislative
Committee
Vote by
Full MPCA Board
Governor's
Office
If rejected, proposal
goes no further
State Legislature
Sponsor Selected
Introduced to
House or Senate
House
Senate
Environment & Nat'1
Resources Committee
Nat'l Resources &
Agriculture Committee
Full House
Vote
Full Senate
Vote
Conference Committee
if differences in bills
Attorney General
Checks Constitutionality
Governor
1. Sign
2. Veto or
3. Pocket veto
2/79
-------
MN 1
Minnesota Budget Legislation
On July 1 of even numbered years the Department of Finance (an execu-
tive agency) provides biennial budget instructions to State agencies.
The MPCA's budget (developed on program element lines) is developed
under the guidance of John Kaus, Director, Administrative Services.
The Agency's proposed budget (including the anticipated level of fed-
eral funding) is submitted to the Governor's office on October 1 and
undergoes a review of the budget and program commitments. The
Governor's hearing review panel is comprised of representatives from
the Governor's staff, the MPCA and the Department of Finance. This
panel develops a recommendation for the Governor which takes the form
of a fact sheet.
The Governor mades his budget address to the Legislature during the
second week in January of odd numbered years. At this time the budget
document for the Executive Branch is provided to the Legislature.
This budget document includes the MPCA's initial budget request accom-
panied by the Governor's recommendation.
The review of this proposed legislation is initiated in the House
before the House Appropriation Committee, Chairman, Fred Norton. In
the Senate the budget review is conducted by the Senate Finance Com-
mittee, Chairman, Rojer Moi.
John Klaus, Dir., Adm Serv., follows the legislation through the
review process and testifies on the average, about 5 times during the
hearings.
An Appropriation Omnilius Bill including the appropriation for all
State Departments is finalized in Conference Committee and its then
approved by the full legislative body. This is usually accomplished
in the waining moments of the legislative session (late April - early
May).
The bill then proceeds to the Governor for action. He cannot restore
cuts, but he can line veto portions of appropriations bills.
Requests for further appropriations can be made when the legislature
is not in session by submitting a proposal to the Department of Finance.
The D of F then makes recommendations to the Legislative Advisory Com-
mittee which is comprised of the Chairmen of the following committees:
House Appropriations Committee, Senate Tax Committee. This LAC nor-
mally meets quarterly. They make recommendations to the Governor who
can appropriate additional money. If the appropriation request is
$10,000 or less the Governor can decide to approve it on his own. If
the request is for $5,000 or less the Dept of Finance can approve it
without going through the Legislative Advisory Committee or the Governor,
A formal request has to be made to the Dept of Finance to switch money
within program element budget categories.
2/79
-------
Minnesota Biennial Budget
MN I 2ka
Department of
Finance
Guidance
July 1 - even years
MPCA. Prepares
Budget
. Request
MPCA. Board
revisions
To Governor's Office
Review by:
Gov. Staff
MPCA Staff
Dept of Finance Staff
Gov prepares State
biennial budget request
2nd Week of January
odd years
Review by
Legislature
House Appropriations Committee - Senate Finance Committee
Testimony by agency reps
1
Conference
Committees
Full House & Full Senate
Governor for Action
(Governor cannot restore cuts, but can line veto portions)
Budget changes -
Less than $5,000 D of F
can approve; $5,000 to
$10,000 gov. can approve:
over $10,000 legislative
committee can approve 2/
-------
MN I 25
MINNESOTA AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS **
Central Fiscal and Administrative Services
Department of Administration
Department of Finance
Department of Personnel
*State Planning Agency
Transportation
Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Transit Commission
Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission
Seaway Port Authority of Duluth
Individual and Social Development
Indian Affairs Intertribal Board
Environmental Management
*Department of Natural Resources
*Pollution Control Agency
*Environmental Quality Council
*Minnesota Environmental Education Board
*Energy Agency
*Water Resources Board
*Southern Minnesota River Basins Board
*Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission
South Dakota-Minnesota Boundary Waters Commission
*Great Lakes Commission
Health Services
*Department of Health
Business and Industry
*Department of Economic Development
*Economic Development Advisory Committee
*Department of Agriculture
*Minnesota State Agricultural Society
*Iron Ranges Research and Rehabilitation Board
Education
*Minnesota Environmental Education Board
Consumer Protection
*Department of Public Service/Public Service Commission
* Names, addresses, personnel, and functional descriptions follow.
** Listing of State Agencies, Boards and Commissions with significant program and or
budgetary interest in environmental progsams.
2/79
-------
MN 1 26
MINNESOTA AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND (612) 296-2388
LAND SURVEYING AND LANDSCAPE PLANNING
5th Floor, Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Executive Secretary: Lowell E» Torseth t
BOARD OF CERTIFICATION FOR WATER AND (612) 296-5331
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
717 Delaware Street, S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Chairman: Perry T. Beaton,
Minnesota Pollution Control
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (612) 296-2856
420 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Commissioner: Mark W. Seetin
Authority for pesticide and fertilizer regulation.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (612) 296-5005
480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Commissioner: David L. Printy
Deputy Commissioner: Steven Kane
Director, Publicity: Sheila Fugina
Director of Research: Kirk Watson
Asst. Com. of Bureau of
Finance and Bus. Dev: Jim Dahmen
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (612) 296-5221
717 Delaware Street S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Commissioner: Dr. George Pettersen
The Department of Health is responsible for the development and maintenance
of an organized system of programs and services for protecting, maintaining
and improving the health of its citizens. Authority includes health problems,
research and identification, investigations, prevention and control of disease,
Health standards, health facility regulation, health manpower and environmental
health hazards.
2/79
-------
MN I 27
MN AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS - cont'd
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION (WATER SUPPLY) (612) 296-4242
Director: Richard Wade, M.D.
Assistant Director: David Giese -5320
Chief, Public Water Supply Gary L. Englund 5330
Environmental Health Division is concerned with water q uality and
supply and general engineering, occupational health, radiation
control, licensing and inspection of eating, drinking and lodging
establishments and trailer coach parks.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (612) 296-6157
Centennial Office Building - Third Floor
St. Paul, MN 55155
Commissioner: Joseph Alexander
Deputy Commissioner: Steven Thorne
Asst. Comm. Admin: Joseph N. Alexander
Asst. Comm. Field Oper: Donald Carlson
Functions: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has the responsib ility
for conserving and promoting the wise use and management of the state's
natural resources: forests, game and fish, lands, minerals, state parks, waters.
Six regions cover the entire state and regional administrators are appointed,
responsible for managing all resources within their assigned region including
coordination of natural resource management. The assistant commissioner
(planning) coordinates planning activities of six divisions (fish and wildlife,
forestry, minerals, parks and recreation, and waters) and the bureau of envir-
onmental planning and protection.
Staff Bureaus of the Commisioner1s office include: Pollution Control Agency
and other environmental agencies. (see further listing)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE (612) 296-7107
7th Floor, American Center Building
Kellogg and Robert Streets
St. Paul, MN 55101
Director: Lawrence J. Anderson
Director, Utilities Div: RObert Carlson
Jurisdiction of the Dept. of Public Service includes rate and service regula-
tion in the state of 394 telephone, natural gas, and electric companies,
60,000 weighing and measuring devices, 1,440 public grain warehouses, 14
railroads, and approximately 3,000 motor carriers.
2/79
-------
MN I 28
MN AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS - cont'd
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Transportation Building
John Ireland Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55155
Commissioner:
Deputy Commissioner:
Bureau of Policy and
Planning
(612) 296-3131
Rich Braun
Harry A. Reed
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 296-2755
Members to be appointed by Commissioner, Department of Economic Development
for 1979-83 terms.
ENERGY AGENCY
740 American Center Building
150 E. Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Director:
(612) 296-5120
John. Millhone
The Energy Agency was created in 1974 to respond to Minnesota's short and
long term energy problems. Its statutory responsibilities are organized
into the following activity areas: certificate of need, conservation,
forecasting, information and education, local services, project management
and data systems, research and administrative support.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL
Capitol Square Building, Room 100
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 296-3985
Chairman:
Arthur Sidner
Members:
Joseph Alexander
Terry Hoffman
Rich Braun
Dr. George Pettersen
Barbara Lukermann
Richard Magnuson
John Millhone
Wesley Ohman
Gwen Schwartz
Mark W. Seetin
Director
State Planning Agency
Commissioner, Natural Resources
Special Asst. to Governor
Executive Director,
Pollution Control Agency
Commissioner, Transportation
Commissioner, Health
At-large
Citizen
Director, Energy Agency
At-large
Citizen
Commiss ioner, Agriculture
Administrator:
Mary Sullivan
2/79
-------
MN I 29
MN AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - cont'd
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL
Function: to promote and insure cooperation and coordination among state
agencies significantly affecting the environment. The EQC also reviews
major actions, programs and legislation to resolve conflicts and to
insure agency compliance with the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act.
Activities include: environmental impact statement process; power plan
siting and transmission line routing; critical areas planning process;
early notice system; Minnesota environmental education; environmental
standards for subdivision of land*
EXECUTIVE COUNCIL (612) 296-3862
208 Administration Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Executive Secretary^
The council consists of the governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of
state, state audietor, state treasurer, and attorney general with the
governor as chairman. Council, among other duties, approves or dis-
approves mineral leases, the extension of timber permits and the sale and
disposal of certain state lands.
GREAT LAKES COMMISSION (218) 254-4540
401-5th Ave., N.E. 254-3323
Chisholm, MN 55719
' Chairman:
Function: to conserve water resources of the Great Lakes; derive may-timm
benefit from utilization of public works; advise, secure and maintain a.
proper balance among industrial, commercial., agriculture, water supply
residential, recreational and other legitimate uses of the lakes.
IRON RANGES RESOURCE AND REHABILITATION BOARD
263 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 5510L (612) 296-2597
P. 0. Box
Eveleth, MN 55734 (218) 749-8260
Commissioner; (Acting) Patrick J. McGauley
Development of natural resources and provision for vocational training and
rehabilitation for residents of counties where resourcas have been depleted.
Various programs are undertaken to promote the mining industry, agriculture
and forest development.
2/79
-------
MM I 30
MN AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - cont'd
MINNESOTA STATE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY (612) 645-2781
State Fairgrounds
St. Paul, MN 55108
Secretary-General Manager:
Conducts annual state fair, manages state fairgrounds.
MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION BOARD (612) 378-7010
AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION COUNCILS (612) 296-3368
275 Hennepin. Square Building
2021 E. Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Chairperson:
Executive Director: Robert A. Klmball
Assistant Director: Karen L. Loechier
Regional Coordinators
Regions 1, 2, 4 Charles J. Gibilisco
Regions 3, 5, 7W John N. Satterlee
Regions 6E, 6W, 8, 9 Pamela Landers
Regions 7E, 10, 11 Carmen L. Borgerding
The Board & Councils are responsible for planning, implementing, and
coordinating environmental education and information activities throughout
the state through and: with both formal educational institutions and comm-
unity, business, industry, and labor organizations and local, state and
federal government units.
MINNESOTA-WISCONSIN BOUNDARY AREA COMMISSION (612) 436-7131
619 Second St. (715) 386-9444
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
Chairman;
Executive Director: James M. Harrison
Commission is directed to conduct studies and make recommendations relating
to the protection, use and development in the public interest of the lands,
river valleys and waters forming the common boundaries of the states.
2/79
-------
MN I 31
MN AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS MB BOARDS - cotit'd
POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (612) 296-7373
of Department of Natural Resources
1935 W. County Road B-2
Roseville, MN 55113
(organization chart and phone directory in earlier listing)
Chairman: Joseph Grinnell Term Expires 1/81
Members: Ms. Carol Buchmann 1/80
Art Engelbrecht 2/82
Steve Gadler 2/82
Burton Genis 2/82
Ms. Marion Watson 1/81
Three members to be appointed by Governor. Former membersDr. Anderson,
Mr. Zentner, and Mr. Field are sittizg in until appointments are made.
Executive Director: Ms. Terry Huffman
Deputy Exec. Director: Lovell E. Richie
Pollution Control Agency (PGA) replaced the former water pollution control
commission and assumed all of its authority in administering and enforcing
all laws relating to water pollution in the state, plus additional respon-
sibilities in the fields of air pollution, solid waste disposal and pollu-
tion-related land use planning.
Division of Water Quality
Director: Barry Schade, acting
Largest of the three divisions in the agency, maintaining five sections
based on functional needs, plus a Section of Divisional Services.
Facilities Section Section Chief: Perry T. Beaton, P.E.
Responsible for conceptual and final engineering review and approval
of plans for all municipal and industrial waste treatment works, technical
assistance for the operation of such municipal works, administration of
the federal and state construction grants program, and training and
certification of waste treatment plant operators.
Permits Section Section Chief: Richard A. Svanda, P.E.
Development, public noticing and issuance of all discharge permits and
state disposal system permits. Administers federally mandated National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for all dischargers to
navigable waters.
Surface and Groundwaters Section John McGuire, P.E.
Development of water quality standards and the routine and special studies
monitoring conducted on surface and groundwaters.
Planning Section Section Chief: Paul E. Davis
Development of river basin water quality management plans and the devel-
opment of Section 208 State Areawide Water Quality Management Plan.
Compliance and Enforcement Chief: Tim K. Scherkenbach
Reviews permit conditions against reported performance, conducts inspec-
tions to determine compliance, maintains emergency spill reaction team.
-------
MN I 32
MN agencies, commissions and boards « cont'd
POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY - cont'd (612) 296-7373
Division of Air Quality
Director: Edward M. Wilk
Engineering Section Section Chief: Louis Chamberlain
Evaluates plans for new or modified air pollutant emission sources,
issues installation and operating permits and conducts source emission
tests to determine compliance with emission regulations. Sources of
major interest are power plants, foundries, processing plants, refin-
eries, chemical plants and bulk material handling operations.
Enforcement Section Section Chief: Gary Pulford
Investigates complaints received from the public, conducts mobile
surveillance operations and annually updates emission inventory of
all major point sources in the State.
Technical Services Section Chief: Gary S. Echkardt
Maintains a statewide air monitoring program to determine ambient air
concentration of seven air pollutants and a sophisticated computer
controlled continuous monitoring network of ten stations in the
Minneapolis-St. Paul Area. An extensive computerized data evaluation,
storage and retrieval system is used and statistical data reports developed.
Transportation Control Section Chief: Bradley J. Beckham
Coordinates traffic control systems, transit, highway programs and
vehicle emission checks to assure meeting Federal ambient air standards
for carbon monoxide in the core city areas. Performs all air quality
related planning functions in the state, such as air quality maintenance
planning, prevention of significant deter±oration planning, indirect
source review and coastal zone management planning.
Noise Control Section Section Chief: Al Perez, P.E.
Recently been established and is developing ambient standards, regula-
tions and a control program.
Division of Solid Waste
Director: Louis Breinhurst, Acting
Responsible for ensuring proper management of solid wastes in the
state through its three major sections.
Resource Recovery and Permits Curtis Sparks
Reviews and evaluates permit applications for sanitary landfills,
transfer stations, demolition waste landfills, and animal waste
feedlot facilities, including review of tax credits for agricul-
tural operations. Reviews environmental impact statements on
various projects, provides assistance in planning and development
of resource recovery systems, and administers Abandoned Motor
Vehicle Grant in aid Program.
2/79
-------
MN I 33
MN agencies, commissions and boards - cont'd
POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY - divisions (612) 296-7373
Division of Solid Waste - cont'd
Enforcement Section Chief: Thomas Clark
Phases out noncoaforming dumps and puts into effect approved facilities
eonaistent with the final county solid waste management plan, inspects
and monitors permitted facilities, maintains procedures for answering
complaints, and reviews tax credits for sanitary landfills.
Hazardous Waste Management Section James Kinsey
Drafts proposed hazardous waste rules and regulations, develops adminis-
trative procedures with metropolitan counties to put into effect a
hazardous waste control program, provides technical assistance to local
governments, industry and the general public on hazardous waste matters,
and monitors and inspects existing hazardous waste facilities in Minne-
sota. Responsible for technical and administrative review of the pro-
posed Chemical Waste Land Disposal Demonstration Project.
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD (612) 296-3767
Centennial Building., Third Floor
St. Paul, MN 55155
Chairman:
Executive Director: Vernon F. Reinert
All the land area of the state is within the 92 Soil and Water Conservation
Districts. The Soil and Water Conservation Board is charged with providing
administrative and financial assistance to the 460 elected supervisors in
carrying out their mandate under M.S. Chapter 40 providing for the conser-
vation of soil and soil resources; for the- control and prevention of soil erosion;
for land resource use practices that effectively reduce silation and loss
of land base.
SOUTHERN MINNESOTA RIVER BASINS BOARD (612) 296-3767
Centennial Office Bldg. Third Floor
St. Paul, MN 55155
Administrative Assistant: Marilyn D. Lundberg
The board is established to serve as the regional organization for guiding
the creation and implementation of a comprehensive environmental conser-
vation and development plan for the basin. The "basin" means the area
within the watersheds of rivers and streams that are tributaries to the
Mississippi River south of its confluence with the Minnesota River.
2/79
-------
MN I
MN agencies, commissions and boards - cont d
STATE PLANNING AGENCY (612) 296-6662
101 Capitol Square Bldg
550 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Director: Arthur Sidner
Comprehensive planning for state. Assistance to local and regional
governments.
WATER RESOURCES BOARD (612) 296-2840
Room 296, 555 Wafaasha
St. Paul, MN 55102
Chairman:
Executive Secretary Erling M. Weiberg
The board has jurisdiction in the establishment of watershed districts
and related matters. (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 112). The board has
the duty of resolving water policy questions arising between governmental
departments or between an individual and a governmental department.
2/79
-------
MN ! 35
PUBLIC INTEREST GROUPS *
MINNESOTA
Business/Industry
CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE:
Bloomington Chamber Rochester Area Chamber
8200 Hunbolt Avenue, S.. of Commerce
Bloomington, MN 55431 212 First Ave. S.W.
(612) 888-8818 Rochester, MN 55901
(507)288-1122
Duluth Area Chamber
325 Harbor Drive St. Paul Chamber of
Duluth, MN 55802 Commerce
(218) 722-5501 Osborn Building
Suite 300
Minneapolis Chamber 370 Wabasha St.
15 S. 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55102
Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 722-5501
(612) 339-8521
DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION MID-CONTINENT AREA
821 Third St. POWER POOL
Farmington, MN 55024 1250 Soo Line Bldg.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 330-6801
MINNESOTA ASSOC. OF COMMERCE David Longo
AND INDUSTRY
200 Hanover Bldg
480 Cedar St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 227-9571
Womens Groups
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
UNIVERSITY WOMEN Minnesota Chapter
Minnesota Division 555 Wabash
900 Summit St. Paul, MN 55102
St. Paul, MN 55105 (612) 224-5445
(612) 227-4477
MINNESOTA FEDERATION OF WOMENS CLUBS - 5th District
2200 Bryant Ave., S.
Minneapolis, MN 55405
(612) 544-5100
Lorraine Harrison
* See Also Hotline '77 by USEPA - Office of Public Affairs
2/79
-------
MN I 36
MN public interest groups - cont'd
Agriculture
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Cooperative Extension Service
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dr. R. H. Abraham
FARM BUREAU:
AMERICAN FABM BUREAU FEDERATION
225 Touhy Avenue
Park Ridge, IL 60068
(312) 399-5700
Jim Porterfield, Director
Natural and Environmental
Resources
MINNESOTA STATE SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION BOARD
300 Centennial Bldg. /
St. Paul, MN 55155
(612) 296-3767
MINNESOTA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
1976 Wooddale Dr.
P. 0. Box 3370
St. Paul, MN 55105
(612) 739-7200
Vern Ingualson
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
National Office
1025 Vermont Ave., N.W.
Room 1105
Washington D.C. 20005
(202) 347-5995
Niel Sampson, Exec. Vice Pres.
James E- Lake, Water Quality Spec.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
State Executive Director
Agricultural Stabilization and
Conservation Service - USDA
230 Federal Bldg.
316 N. Robert St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Urban Groups
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
300 Metro Square Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 291-6452
CITIZENS LEAGUE
84 S. 6th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 338-0791
Ted Kolderie, Exec. Dir.
Susan Kluesher, Info. Dir.
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES
2305 Ford Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55116
(612) 698-4212
James Shipman, Exec. Dir.
Regional Office:
NACD
1025 Clark St.
Stevens Point, WI 54481
(715) 341-1022
William J. Horvath,
North Central Regional Rep.
U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
State Conservationist
Soil Conservation Service - USDA
200 Federal Bldg.
316 N. Robert St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
MINNESOTA PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH GROUP
3036 University Ave., S.E.
Minneapolis. MN 55414
(612) 376-7554
Dr. S. STephen Chapman, Dir.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
300 Hanover Building
480 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 222-2861
2/79
-------
MN I 37
MN public interest groups - cont'd
Environmental
DUCKS UNLIMITED
5700 University N.E.
Fridley, MN 55421
(612) 571-6280
IZAAK. WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA.
Minnesota Division
111 E. Franklin Ave.,
Suite 210
Minneapolis, MN 55404
(612) 871-8705
MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
FOUNDATION, INC.
5400 Glenwood Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55422
(612) 544-8971
Regional Development Commissions
1-425 Woodland Ave.
Crookston, MN 56716
(218) 281-1396
2 - Box 584
Bemidji, MN 56601
(218) 751-3108
3 - 200 Arrowhead Place
Duluth, MN 55802
(218) 722-5545
4 - Administration Bldg
Fergus Falls Comm. College
Fergus Falls, MN 56537
(218) 739-3356
5 - 102'- 6th St. N
Staples, MN 56479
(218) 894-3233
6E- City Auditorium
311 W. 6th St.
Willmar, MN 56201
(612) 235-8504
ST. PAUL PLANNING AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
1200 City Hall Annex
25 W. Fourth St.
St. Paul, MN 55102
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
1825 Nevada Ave. S
Minneapolis, MN 55426
(612) 545-7555
Charles J. Griffith
NATURE CONSERVANCY
325 W. 15th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55403
(612) 871-6231
John Humke
6W - 128 W. Sorenson
Appleton, MN 56208
(612) 289-1981
7E - Kanabec County Courthouse
18 Vine St. N
Mora, MN 55051
(612) 679-4065
7W - 2700 1st St. N.
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(612) 253-7870
8 - 2711 Broadway
Slayton, MN 56172
(507) 836-8549
9 - Manpower Services Bldg.
709 Front St.
Mankato, MN 56001
(507) 387-5643
10 - 301 Marquette Bank Bldg
Rochestern, MN 55901
(507) 285-2550
2/79
-------
MN I 38
MINNESOTA
MAJOR STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
1945 The Water Pollution Control Act
Minnesota Statue, Chapter 115
1963 Minnesota Statues 115.41 to
115.53 1969 and 1973)
Amended in 1967
1967 Minnesota Pollution Control Act
Minnesota Stat. 116
1969 Minn. Stat. 115.071
Minn. Stajt. 115.05, 116.075
Minn. St. 473D.07
1971 Minn. Stat. 116.07
Minn. Stat. 116.18
Minn. Stat. 11SB
"Minnesota Environmental Rights Act"
1973 Minn. Stat. 116C
Minn. Stat. 116D
Minn. Stat. 116F
1974 MPCA
Establishes Water Pollution
Control Commission to enforce
Water pollution control laws.
Provides for long range planning
to abate water pollution
Abolished Water Pollution
Control Commission. MPCA
given authority for water,
air and solid waste.
MPCA given authority to enforce,
prosecute, etc.
Increased opportunity for public
notice and participation
Gave MPCA authority over solid
waste disposal sites in Twin
Cities.
Gave MPCA authority to regulate
noise pollution
Established state 15% match
to Federal Construction Grants.
Allows suits by MPCA, citizens,
other government bodies, etc.,
to bring a civil action against
any polluter.
Established the Environmental
Quality Council
Sets out Minnesota's environmental
policies and goals.
Allows grants in aid for resource
recovery programs.
MPCA given authority to regulate
hazardous wastes.
2/79
-------
MIN II 1
a -?
1 5^
-o^ s"
8 |!
ill
3
1
* s
tJ
If
r'
O V
r!f
S^Sa
s|»«-
i
1
w
II
j-j
S a
il
j
2
4
3
0 -
t
I
C -
-i * ^
-a > 3%
a c *e
1 -1
; s
i
l|
^1
^.o
» t/1
i
_l
E
2
LU
DC
(0
i
<
>§
n
C9 =
UJ 2
* K
£
CO
5
O
O
o
o
CC
0.
^
«*!*!
1||2||
:i3. si s^3 s^f "|s|
35 QJ **&- S -ai*j e ^ » oJ <
hi ll P3 P3 IS11
5^
o g
s 13 s| |I| -
» *a 55 "33 o
»i 3
t"S
3 '
5
2i^ O 13 * u
v5 S^ Si
V 5 » N -H T3
S33 S £3
S ill
3 33
S '
a*
ER DIV
ftucfe S
iW Al
odd Ca
Hi
ss
j3
V -2
a
X
i
a
4
C
«
Z£
1 o
J-l
c
3 =
J O
"i
si
i
i
(0
^
r Quality
nt FuUvi
2£-
s
c
S3
I!
S^
S
§1 3-
^ s **
I? li
oc QJ
33
° 8
i
3^.-
?£ Si
> < d ^J
>i S~e « <;
2 S »s
§ 3
2/79
a *
i i
-------
KEY *
Date
USEPA - REGION V
GRANT STATUS REPORTS *
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - Part III
May 1980
III 1
State
MINNESOTA
G * Guidance
D » Draft
C - Reg. Comments
F = Final
A * Award
E =* Evaluation
Jan
AIR POLLUTION Planned
CONTROL Actual
(Section 105; Comments
SOLID WASTE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
Comments
HAZARDOUS Planned
WASTE Actual
MANAGEMENT Comments
WATER Planned
POLLUTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
(Section 106)
PUBLIC Planned
WATER Actual
SUPERVISION Comments
UNDERGROUND Planned
INJECTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
STATE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
ASSISTANCE Comments
(Section 205g)
WATER Planned
QUALITY Actual
PLANNING Comments
(Section 208)
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
G
G
June
July
D
D
Aug
C
C
Sept
F
A F
Oct
A
Nov
bee
-rf
ci c;
C1 3
C 4J
$E *<
G
E
D
C
D
F
C
A
FA
261
G
h
D
C
U
h
C
A
FA
!
283
E
G
D/C
F
A
FY 81 Allocation $910,000
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - $585,800
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - 553,700 MPCA will not seek primacy at this
time. Grant will be awarded to USGS, State University, or State
Health Department.
C
- £ ' ' f ""j '~f~~ =.-""
1 . "
FY7- grant =cp icat on for Si.oM has oeen received
award projected for 3/SG.
c.
A-
* Indicate KEY letters for each grant. Utilize all KEY letters on "Planned" line
2/79 and, as steps are completed, indicate key letters on "Actual" line.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT (Part III SIS)
AIR PROGRAMS BRANCH - EPA REGION V
State Minnesota
Konth April .
I.
SANCTIONABLE SIPS
CRITERIA
POLLUTANTS
APPROV ABILITY
ISSUES
ANTICIPATED RESOLUTION
NATURE
DATE
TSP
Major Approvability
Issues:
None (SIP not yet receiv?
d).
S02
Major Approvabilitv Issues: Final State subniittal for Twin Cites and for
Rochester is currently under review.
Ch/CO/NO?
Stationary Source 3ACT: Major Approvability Issues: |one
I/M
7
Not required; hrwever, scecial monitoring study being undertaken to make final
c'sterminaticn. Governor Quie has submitted an I/M implementation schedule in
case special st-cyjshows need for I/M.
Transportation Control Plans
I
Major Approvabil:-^' Issues: None
\
II.
STAIIGSZ SCr?.CZ PERMITS
PSD
COM?LZTIC:T EZTZRI-IINATIONS
i^-SES. CCI-iPLZrE
THIS MONTH
0
MT.-IBER
OVERDUE
0
FINAL DETERMINATIONS
YEAR
TO
DATE
0
THIS
MONTH
0
INCOMPLETE:
IN-HOUSE FOR:
UP TO
120 DAYS
0
120 TO
180 DAYS
0
OVER 6
MONTHS
0
'
i
III. DELEGATIONS ACCOMPLISHED THIS MONTH; Has full PSD delegation
2/79
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS III 3
Part III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT MINNESOTA
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V Month
I. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Status of State Efforts to Prepare for Open Dunp Inventory (narrative)
Inventory priorities are being set, staff trained; inspections and
determinations began with the Spring thaw.
3. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Regions
Simultaneous with agencies. Completed September 6, 1978. _
C. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Agency
Completed September 6, 1978.
II. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Has state expressed intention to seek authorization to operate the
program? X Yes No Coonents; Expressed February 23. 1979.
B. Does legislative authority exist for the program? X Yes No
If no, comment:
C. ' Status of state regulations development: Hazardous Waste regulations
effective June 18, 1979, include manifest system.
III. STATUS OF URBAN RESOURCE RECOVERY GRANTS
City of St. Paulgrant awarded September 27, 1979.
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (narrative) Minnesota has a State Noise Control
Program (two positions plus student help). (cont'd,)
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (narrative) All of the Region V State
Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) have to be reviewed (cont'd.)
2/79
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATE MINNESOTA
PART III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT MONTH MAY
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (cont'd.)
We are supporting one ECHO (Each Community Helps Others) program in
Bloomington. We also are providing technical assistance, equipment
loan, and training through environmental noise workshops. Cooperative
agreement awarded to Minnesota League of Cities.
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (cont'd.)
again using the Federal Emergency Management Administration's (REMA)
revised criteria. A State visit has been made to discuss requirements
of the new criteria.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - III
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PESTICIDES BRANCH - EPA V
State_
Month
III
April
1980
I. ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT:
Status of Grant Grant awarded 2/27/80
Amount of Grant $502 ,'580
Enforcement
Activities
Use Inspections
Producer Establishments
Inspected
Producer Establishment
Samples Collected
Marketplace Samples
Collected
Import
Investigations
Civil Complaints
Notices of Arrival
Reviewed
Import Detentions
Stop Sale, Use or
Removal Orders
Criminal Referrals
Recalls Initiated
EPA
This
Month'
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
Year i
r£°0 fitment
0
0
0
0
0
1
53
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STATE
This
Month
6
12
37-
61
Year
to
Date
104
35
80
245
Commi-
:ment
400
30
100
400
TOTAL
This
Month
6
12
37
61
Year u
Cu i
104 400
35 30
80 100
245 400
-
II. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM formal application received 4/8/80
Amount of Grant $35,409 (proposed) Mid year Evaluation conducted 4/W80
Status of Training Program Activity: No training sessions.
III Quantify and describe indicators of health problems reported as result of
pesticides misuse during month:
IV. Special local Meed Requests Received: 1 recieved in April; 9 recieved year to da
2/79
-------
Ill 5
- REGIOM 7
REGIDNAL PROGRAM SP\TrJ3 REPORT
i^TER - P\RT III
ENVIRONMENTAL
513
Minnesota
0<\TE May 5, 1930
page 1 of 2 page(s)
SCHEDULE
PROJECT N^ME
(list)
ORIG
CURRENT
DELAY
RECENT
(weeks)
CUMULATIVE
(TIOS)
REA3DN FDR DELW
( Recent/Cumulative)
Twin Citias
D 2/79
5/30
15
3e:nidji
0 11/77
7/30
32
; in
inputs fom
facilities planning
consultants.
Delay in RSM due
to problems in disposal
site selection.
Facilities planning
delays resulting
from delays in
modeling for C30.
to respond to
questions on feasibility
study and to produce
finished report adequate
for facilities planning
needs. Delays in receiv
ing coTvnants on W&PORA
feasibility study.
Inability of City to
delineate acreage for
soils analysis to deter-
mine feasibility for
land application.
Rescheduling necessary
to accounodate
recently approved
facilities planning
schedule changes.
Problems in obtaining
tinely contracts
and revisions to
contracts, legal
delays in gaining
access to orooosed land
I- Draft
- Final
Recent - Delays since previous report
-------
Ill 5
EPA - REGION 7
REGIDMAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
,?AT2R - PART III
ENGINESRING
STATE Minnesota
DATE "day 5, I960
page 2 of 2 paqe(s)
PROJECT
(list)
SCHEDULE
ORIG
DELAY
RSCEMT
(weeks)
CUMULATIVE
(mOS)
REA3QM FOR DELAY
' Recent/Cumulative
Otter
Tail
F 9/73
5/80
21
Green Lake
F 9/73
5/30
21
- Draft
F - Final
Re-cent - Delays since previous report
application sites and
additional SIS and
Facilities planning data
needs.
Cumulative-Delay in defini-
ti^ation of contract.
Large numbers of late
requests for and comments
on 0513. Problems in
obtaining contracts anJ
revisions to contracts.
Additional data require-
ments to augment needs
documentation and
developnent of alternative
technologies such
as land application,
and on-lot or cluster
systems.
Recent-Delay in definiti-
zation of contract. Cumu-
lative - ResDlution of
issues raised in public
hear ing and in DEIS
commentary. Proolems in
obtaining timely contracts
and revisions to contracts
Additional data require-
ments to augment needs
documentation and devel-
opment of alternative
technologies such as
land application, and
on-lot or cluster
systems. HQ withhold-
ing of carryover funds.
-------
USEPA - EEGIO:i V
WATER -SIC PART III
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT FORM
WATER QUALITY PLAINING
III 7
208
S t a t e
Month
19£0
20S Agencies
(list)
Statewide
Metro Council
Status of (For example, has the plan been certified?
208 Plan approval granted by EPA? dollars amount of
ongoing grant? general scope of effort?
outstanding issues? If in house, when will
review^ be completed? Is anyone hold in e up
MFCA Board approved the 208 Plan on Feb. 8, 1980.
The Governor certified the Plan to EPA March 10, 1980.
EPA must complete review and approval process by May 1, 1980.
208 Plan was certified July 19, 1979. EPA conditional approval
letter was transmitted March 4, 1980.
Ongoing 208 planning will complete "Phase II," non-point
source planning, for urban and rural pollution control.
Metro Council currently has about $900,000 Federal dollars
for the Phase II effort.
II. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Describe state activity related to standards revision, time-frame, and
regional strategy being pursued:
WQS will go to public hearing March 31, 1980. EPA will provide
testimony at the hearincr Mav 2, 1980.
!/79
-------
USEPA - Region V
III - 8
State MINNESOTA
Regional Program Status Report Form
Part III
Water Supply
I. Primacy Status: X Yes _ No Date Scheduled
Month W 198°
5. Percent of MCL violations which were followed-up
on with warning letters, telephone calls, or on-
site visits
6. Percent of MCL violators which were found to have
given public notice
II. Public Water System Supervision Program Status
A. Compliance with Regulations:
1. Percent of Community Water Systems in compliance with
MCL requirements ^ '"
2. Percent of Community Water Systems in compliance with
Monitoring/Reporting requirements '°
3. Percent of Noncommunity systems known to be in
compliance with MCL requirements '
4. Percent of Noncommunity systems known to be in
compliance with monitoring/reporting requirements '
7. Percent of Monitoring/Reporting violations which
were followed up with warning letters, phone calls,
or on-site visits "0/0
B. Issues:
-------
^ in
o- ;-
w *-2
n p]
J.J. ~j
a' r.
O ^3
O
K
n
pi
O
z
r_^
o
z
\
n
p
-£
S X- r-
1 O o
Z O
00 PI
^ § j?
< <-f s
QJ --' KM
13
Q) <-t-
CT
rD Q)
Q.
03
a.
05
05
r^
a>
c-t-
05
Q.
O
r^
3"
0
oo
rf
QJ '
05
t>
=
3"
O
-s
[-(
-h
O
"5
rt-
3-
p
~!
2
-5
It
3
11
A
3
D
y
D
0
3
*"/1 -t
c* r
0 -:
Ln t/J
1 >
OO
O
o
Jf
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
^
3>
o
-- "-? r"
'1 -* r- 'I
o'j en :-:
0 V.' 0
I.T
'**.
-J
-
h '
1 '
O
o
*
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
^y
^(
0
d
C v "1
U1
00
oo
UD '
^.
"T"
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
oo
1 *
^J
en
s^J
o &J o
c: L, <-)
,a O >
o ?3 r1
n
^ < O >T3 S
0 -1 ^ S H
c^ r* o w
~ > p n
O H
^ pi c3
S§ o m
°. S n >
>. B ^
O % X
» o w a
i-3
~ S C B
S O K H
> P5 »
3 H ?= E3
CO t?
^ ^3 O a
H to ij n
"~" h-t
O
2 -)
O "
2: l-i
-: CO
PI
O W
H H
ra o
S H
0 =
H W
:s
o P:
H ^3
r^
M
0
S H
O «
t^t i <
g CO
*<
> >
-1 ?3
"g
Is
c ri
"i 5
O
^
^
»-}
PI
P!
-J
**
*"
|
C
O
u
n
re
i-t
CJ
H-
U
i
h-
C
(D
m
f?
h-
01
S
^
^
PI
T3
>
C-.
^J
^ r~'
Ul "
^ ^n
> -D
^ 9
o
6 ~
73 en
0 H
S H
P? c:
J| w
I 1
Q H
r TJ
P3 1
73
PI
O CO
o to
<
rt
rt
n
j«
3
3
03
1 (rt
0
Cu
f
rr
a-
3»
O
-s
I,
r! X^! '
H
0 f
en
t
MD
CO
O
8 III
-------
III 10
o
CO
S-
Q_
O
(/I
ai
5
H
DC
U
o
NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS]
% IN COMPLIANCE
(Total of all
FEDERAL ACTIONS
STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
**
FY 80 f° DATE
ACCOtfPLISHUENTS **
>MMITMENTS
S
o
00
bu
a.
a
w
H
H
CO
ons) ** i
PERCENT
Vlolatl
NUMBER
FEDERAL
ACTIONS
FY 80
3H ai Z
CJ 3 O
U4 < C S
SCHEDULE
VIOLATIONS
FINAL
EFFLUENT
VIOLATIONS
ACTUAL
SCHEDULE
VIOLATORS
ACTUAL
FINAL
EFFLUENT
VIOIATORS
VIOLATING
SCHEDULES
7IOLATING
FINAL
UNITS
MAJOR
SOURCES
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL
CM
CM
00
i
=!
o ° 5
OS si
s £ °
> 5 n.
cot;
CS Oi
> g 5 O
z o a
S
-
O
CM
aq.E
aiE
U9AL9 SUOiq
MUNICIPAL
DISCIIARGEIIS
O
-
CO
OO
° c? 2
5 1 ?°
z 0 u
0 ° <
ce. x.
O BS H.
Z 0 K
O
o
-
-
IS 9M1 ^9
oaf cud ON
3S 941 ^9
oa Co-id ON
in
oo
NON-MUNICIPAL
DISCHARGERS
T3
4-
O
to
d)
0
r
^C
2
c ^
a:
-4
U
ai
o;
<- o
OO
61
'^1
b
0
g
a
3
g
1
a
H
O
^*
_3
P-
j
o
o
a:
s
2
s:
^
**"
a
z
o
o
z
o
s
s
z
z
0
M
H
o
<
J
£
»J
H
<
C
4-
0
(T
i
i
a
M-
a
Q
^
S
£=1
O
CJ
-------
OT III
o CD f
fj^ 2 t/1
->. 0) C
-h -< 05
-i. 3 Q.
05 -
CL 3 -
CQ ~n
* * "^
-< -n '
-< co
' CO
CD
PO
O
c:
i
.
c
^s
r
a
C CO
rt-H
3~G
CQ CO
30
0 *=J
3
rt-'o
0 X
-'O
3 >
O
oo 2»
O H
3 53
05 O
L '
"O
05 TJ
~5 50
3 O
rt* 50
oo >
CT?
C
rt-/^^
3
05 M
05 ^(
Q-C3
^ rr
uu
rt-<
O (S
>^^
05
X
~a oo
CU rl-
3 CU
CL rt-
05
rt"
3- 3-
fD Cu
-J. CO
-s
n
05 O
~~b 3
h ~O
0 '
T 05
rt- rt-
fD
CL
rt-
O
X
^i.
O
CU
3
rt-
CO
rt-
-5
Cu
rt-
05
CQ
^<
*~^
-5
fD
O
O5
-J>
<
05
CL
00
1
ai
j
CO
o
,
GO
rt-
Cu
rt-
fD
~j*
CO
~tl CU
C 3 CO
i 0 H
Cu O G
D rt- O
rt- O5
O ~5 58
3 PJ
rt- ~s pa
o CD w
rt- >
3 -5 H
0 05 2
rt- Cu PJ
rt-2
-h 3 H
-< fD
O 3 TJ
cu <-(- pa
~i >»J
0* -S 53
3 O >
CQ 2
o -s -
-h Q)
Cu 3
-h- M
-r» C_. i-i
05 C it
n ts
*D H*
O"> f&
-J. l« V^
3
5. i ___
CO "^4 J«
rt- CO 3
^ ^_^ -^
i. *» 05
"D OO
CO Q) O
3 rt-
o . QJ
Cu ^
-S Cu
05 co
"O rt-
-5 3-
O 05
O
05 -h
05 ->
CL -s
-J. CO
3 rt-
CQ
CO
rt- rt*
O Cu
rt-
3 05
0
CL -".
-" 3
t^
<< rf-
3"
CU fD
J
' O
O
~a c:
05 3
-5 c-t-
3 ~S
-J« *<
rt-
co rt-
0
-s
00 05
o n
3 05
05 -
-<
-D 05
c
05 -h
00 C
. -K '
C^
o
3 m
-Q
CD 3=
00
CU
rt- 0
O 0
05
-a
rt-
1
> H
7CTU3~UF
.CILITY
*"w
PJ G
2 r
M PJ
H O
TJ H
O O
0 2
fa
> o
2 "J
»*
hj^
""x M
3 0
D> PJ
H 50
H >
*
H-
^
m
0 3=-
05 C
O rt-
D 3""
3 0
CT -S
fD ->
-S ^rt"
CO
rt-
0
j
co *^*
^J co
CO CO
c~
05
a
05 -S
-S 05
3 -Q
-" C
rt- -"
00 -S
05
rt- CL
O
-n
fD
CL
05
-5
01
t
-h
CU
0
_J*
J
_^>
rt-
fD
CO
CL
05
05
CQ
Oi
rt-
fD
CL
O
3
3=
£D
tt
O
cr
i
i
*
t-o
ro
0
on
a
fD
^
3
i.
rt-
oo
-5
fD
a
j
OJ
o
O5
CL
,cr
c<
00
rt-
QJ
rt-
05
a
05
-s
3
rt-
^
O
z
-^
a
m
oo
T3
fD
-s
=3
rt-
00
2 2
G O
H 1
0
M
TJ
>
r1
ro
,
ro
on
p^
O
o o oo
O 3"
C cu T3
-5 -S 05
rt1 CQ "^
05 3
O -"
-S -h <-t-
CL -S co
05 O
-S 3 3"
01
0 <
3 05
05
3
O 05
-h <
O)
rt- -S
3-
05 a~
00 05
fD OJ
3
-h
Oi _j.
n oo
i. CO
i c:
-J. 05
rt- CL
05'"
oo 3-
O
-1- S
00 05
O 05
o -s
fD "
-5 rt-
05 3-
Q. 05
CT Q.
00
QJ 1
~n
m
> a
s m
j <
0 3»
PO O
o
CO
CO
o
o
^
o
-^
05
-^>
oo
00
C
05
Cu
O
rt-
_j.
O
3
-5
05
.a
c:
i.
-s
05
Q.
-h
O
-s
TI
CO
o
^2
Q 2
O M
i-3 O
- TJ
M >
"
4^
^
0
O
TJ 2
R C
§ 0
M en 2 H
0 0 > 0
PJ G (_ H
3 S 2 &
H n ya c-1
M PJ
ft co
3
a
TJ PJ M 2
!T1 'Tj CO G
» Tl co 2
2 PJ G W
l-l O PJ PJ
H H 0 PO
CO M
PJ 2
O
PI 2 T) SB
"J O PJ G
Tl H 70 2
PJ 20
n M PJ
H H ya
M CO
< a
W «J
;» en 8" 2
3 M G
TJ 2 PJ 2
O O "fl S3
pa PJ **i PJ
H Pi pa
tr1 o
> H M
CO M CO
H < CO
PJ G
PJ
O
n
o
g
PJ
2
co
o
2
Q
|
CO
CO
c;
2;
FTl
r/5
6L/Z
2 PJ
-3 2
& "=i
PI o
en pa
o
TJ PI
PI 2
H
CO
25
£.»
o
I-1
TJ
PI
pi
TJ
CO
t-*
CO
en
rr
O
oo
O
2
O
3
rr
CO
o
-------
Organics Regulations state Region-wide
Division
Branch Mater Supply
Date May 7, 1980
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form;
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the'issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update r n this issue.
Summary of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic organic
contamination of industrial origin. Sixty-two indicator organic materials were named
as being possibly associated with such contamination, and granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment was proposed as the best available means of removing these contaminants
from drinking water. Design criteria were designated for the GAC treatment. A simul-
taneous proposal was made to limit trihalomethane contamination to 10 ppb in drinking
water. Such contamination develops as a result of reactions between the treatment
chemical, chlorine, and naturally present organics.
ckground:
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No laboratories
have been certified for the necessary organic analyses. Laboratory methods have
not been established beyond the research laboratory to give the sensitivity impor-
tant to drinking water analyses. The trihalomethane (TTHM) regulation appears to
be of small importance to Region V, in that no large systems to which the proposal
was limited have been shown to have high TTHM levels present.
Perception on Issues:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be familiar with the
tests required and should be confident in the results of such tests. Lacking standard-
ized methods and certified laboratories, the only dependable source for such information
would appear to be highly specialized laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Water Supply Branch has determined to carry out a
study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems most likely to be affected by
industrial contamination.
Involved Character^:
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Update:
!AO now lags 2 months on preparation of certification guidelines for trihalomethane
nalysis. This is now becoming a; critical issue with Ohio EPA especially concerned
about our credibility and their cooperative stance. The treatment effects specialist
has begun gathering data for early TTHM investigative work in Indiana and Ohio.
-------
IV 1
State Minnesota
Division Water
Branch Construction Management Branch
Date July 5, 1979
USEPA-REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form.
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:.
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS--all public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE: Potential Obligation Shortfall for Minnesota
. , Ori8- 3/26/79 Rev.
Background: Commitment Actual Commitment
Through 3rd Quarter $40 M $21 M $8 9 M
Through 4th Quarter $60 M $ * $78!o M
*$39 M needed to meet commitment; $57 M needed to meet the revised commitment.
$34 M needed to obligate remaining FY 78 funds.
Discussion:
I. Present: Four of the original nine fast track projects are projected for funding
in the 4th quarter totaling $57.9 M (Rochester - $31.1 M, Albert Lea - $18.0 M,
Buffalo - $7.0, Monticello - $1.8 M). Buffalo has been certified by MPCA and is
currently under review. The applications for Rochester, Albert Lea and Monticello
are expected to be certified by September 10, July 31 and August 31, 1979,
respectively, but advance copies of the Rochester and Albert Lea applications have
been received and are under concurrent review. The User Charge and Industrial
Cost Recovery Systems for each of the above projects except Rochester have been
submitted and are under review. Rochester's proposed systems are due in this
month. The 4th quarter commitment and/or obligation of FY 78 funds cannot be
attained without the Rochester award and all efforts are being taken by MPCA and
EPA to ensure award prior to September 30, 1979.
II. Future: As of July 3, 1979, the State of Minnesota has $120.8 M available for
funding. Of special concern is the $34.2 M for FY 78 which must be obligated
by September 30, 1979, the $8.1 M for FY 77 which must be obligated by May 3 1930
and the $77.4 M for FY 79 which must be obligated by September 30, 1980. Funding '
of the fast track projects in the 4th quarter would leave a balance of $61 8 M to
be obligated by September 30, 1980. Although the June 7, 1979 draft of the FY 80
Project Priority List contains more projects than necessary to utilize the
available funds, it should be noted the number of projects projected to accomplish
this task (approximately 290) appears to be excessive in light of the State's
past performance. The need for the large number of projects continues to be the
lack of Metropolitan Waste Control Commission projects due to the ongoing
Environmental Impact Statement which is scheduled to be completed June, 1980.
Cast of Characters: USEPA and MPCA Construction Grants Staffs.
JUL IS]
-------
State MINNESOTA MN IV 2
Water Division
Division
Water Supply Branch
Branch
Date December 6. 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form;
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERST-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Summary of Issue:
Minnesota Underground Injection Control Program on October 23, 1979, the State advised
Region II that it would not participate in the UIC program at this time. Accordingly,
a meeting is being scheduled to discuss the Region's implementation of the program with
appropriate State representatives. A brief'topic of discussion will be the expenditure
by the Region of funds not requested by the State.
Background:
In non-participating UIC States,funds assigned to the States revert to the Region for
use in implementing the UIC program. Region V will be implementing the program in
Minnesota, but wishes to coordinate this implementation with the State to the greatest
possible degree. Accordingly, expenditure of funds for implementation of the UIC progr<
will be discussed with the State, to insure there is no duplication of data or effort.
Since all injections have been prevented in Minnesota, it is anticipated that the Regioi
program will be limited to permitting two gas storage fields (45 wells), which are con-
sidered a demonstration project and conducting an inventory for Class IV (shallow
hazardous) and Class V (shallow general) wells.
Perception of the Issue:
Although the UIC program in Minnesota will be a limited one, it will require a consider
able amount of coordination with the State. It is anticipated that the State will be
helpful in identifying needed aquifer mapping and structuring inventory efforts. We
expect ona major problem in Minnesota.
Involved Characters:
Karen Theisen, Water Supply Branch
Gordan Meyer, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
UPDATE;
It is anticipated that the Ground Water Protection Section will complete
the_inventory of the 45 gas storage wells this month, and begin coordi-
nation with various State agencies regarding aquifer mapping activities
Regional plans for use of all FY 79 UIC funds allocated to Minnesota will
be finalized this month and relayed to Headquarters.
-------
State All IVMN2
Division Enforcement
Branch Permit
Date 3-9-79
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following foraat to summarise special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS?-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As naw
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Issue - 1. States are having moderate to severe resource problems in
establishing their MPDES pretreatment programs. 2. The Region has a very
tight schedule in the State pretreatment program delegation process.
Background - EPA's pretreatment regulations (June 1973) require all NPDES states
to establish and implement a pretreatment program. Where state legal authority
exists, they must apply to operate the pretreatment program by March 27, 1979.
If authority is not in place then the State has up to March 1930 to apply. While
preliminary steps could be taken the magnitude of the program for larger states
has only been recently defined (reduced about 75%}. Availability of resources
is the major issue. Even a minimum program not fully addressing the full requirenents
will require 8 (MM) to 25 (OH-IL) staff by the end of FY 80. No new 106 or other
funds are likely to be available. Where states have 205 authority, seme 106 funds
have been made available but largely lost through inflation. While a number of
PQTWs presently have pretreatnent programs in various stages, pretreatment is
looked at as another new Federal program with no funds to implement. Therefore, to
operate a pretreatment program, other existing programs will have to be additionally
cut. Funding is generally available for FY 79, but FY 80-81 funding will be a
major issue needing resolution in the 106 and 205 process. Failure to operate
the pratreatment program are grounds for withdrawal of NPDES authority and EPA
will then have to operate both the ;i?DES and the pretreatment programs. In addition,
no Step II (July 80) or Step III (December 80) grants can be given to POTWs needing
pretreatmant programs unless pretreatment implementation schedules are being met
by those dates. Hoy/ever, even with very limited resources Region V states have
in general done an outstanding job of laying out and starting to gear up and move
the program. We are faced with this major issue now because of the March 27, 1979,
regulatory reporting requirement by the states to commitment to future minimum
resources.
Tne pratreatment regulations allow EPA 90 days to rule on a state's application
which includes publication in the Federal Register and some 800 newspapers, along
with a 45 day public comment period. Meeting the time requirement, particularly
obtaining timely Headquarters concurrence, will require special handling and close
cooperation. A determination by OGC requires the Region to expend $150,000 not
previously budgeted, for newspaper notices. This requirement will be removed when
the regulations are changed, but not in time to be of assistance to the Region.
Involved Cast of Characters - Regional responsibility for pretreatrnent is in
the Enforcement Division follo'.ved by the Water Division and Regional Counse-1 .
Similar staff are involved in the states. In addition, seme 700-900 POTWs will
be required to establish programs and 20,000 to 60,000 industries will be effected.
2/79
-------
State _
Minnesota
IV 3
Division Air & Hazardous Material
Branch Pesticide
Date 4/4/79
USE?A - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions- for Completion, of this Fora:
Please use-the following format to summarize.special problems requiring attention:
Include a description susunarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the IIvrOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Issue: Pesticide Enforcement Agreement outputs
Background: The 1978 FIFRA Amendments gave the states enforcement primacy (Sec. 26
'as of this date, three states (Michigan, Minnesota and Indiana with
Enforcement Agreement/Grants) have automatic use primacy.
Illinois and Wisconsin have also been granted primacy pursuant to an
effective Sec. 4 applicator certification plan. Ohio has indicated
that state cooperation with the Administrator's Emergency Suspension
Order of 2/28/79 (2,4,5-T and Silvex) would be extremely limited.
Consequently, the Agency is presently considering denying use primacy
to Ohio because of this reluctance to cooperate. This matter must
be resolved as soon as possible.
Cast of
Characters: Illinois - Dwight Dunbar, Chief, Bureau of Plant & Apiary Protection
Illinois Dept. of Agriculture
Indiana - L. 0. Nelson, Pesticide Administrator, Office of
Indiana State Chemist
Michigan - Dean Lovitt, Chief, Plant Industry Division, Michigan
Department of Agriculture
Minnesota - Tom McConnell, Acting Director, Agronomy Services,
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Ohio - Oren Spilker, Specialist in Charge, Pesticide Regulation,
Ohio Department of Agriculture
Wisconsin- William Simmons, Chief, Bureau of Special Services,
Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
4/
-------
State
_DZ 4
Division Water Pivison
Water Supply Branch
Branch
Date April 3, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following format to summarise, special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUiTD
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly updata on this issue.
Summary of Issue:
EPA has spent considerable resources in developing the Model State
Information System for use by the Regions and the States in handling
public water system data. As with most new data systems, the MSIS is
beset by interpretational and programming errors and anamolies which
make it difficult to use at present. Region V's Water Supply Branch is
striving to implement MSIS for use on Indiana water system data.
Background:
MSIS inventory has long been considered useable. Recent outputs,
however, indicate that an edit is necessary. This edit will be initi-
ated state by state, as soon as the Federal Reporting Data System input
(which ties directly to MSIS) is completed. MSIS compliance programs
have not been operated successfully in Region V.
Perception on Issue:
Headquarters has accepted contractor product which has many programming
errors in definition and which is often inefficient and difficult to
use. Correction of this programming has been unnecessarily prolonged by
marriage to the contractor product.
Involved Characters:
Headquarters, Other Regions, Region V, and the States.
Update:
All Indiana data for the first quarter of FY 79 has been edited and
corrected. January and February data are now being coded, edited, and
corrected. A portion of Wisconsin's "front-end" entry procedures were
found to have potential in Region V's use of MSIS. The Headquarters'
"correction package" for MSIS operations still has bugs being worked
out. Front-end edits to the compliance program for FRDS have proven
unnecessarily bulky and time-consuming. Efforts to make FRDS and MSIS
compliance useable are continuing.
4/79
-------
State Minnesota - -
Water Division
Division
Branch Uater Supply Branch
Date April 3, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion, of this Fora:
Please use the following format to suoaarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE,' a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CKARACTERST-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other probleas arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly updata on this issue.
Summary of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic
organic contamination of industrial origin granular activated carbon as a
treatment technique. Sixty-two -indicator organics were named as being
possibly associated with such contamination. Variance from the treatment
technique was proposed to be made dependent on analyses for these indi-
cators.
Background:
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No
laboratories have been certified for the required organic analyses. In
fact, methods do not exist for analysis of several of the compounds.
Perception on Issue:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be
familiar with the tests required and should be confident in the results
of such tests. Lacking standardized methods and certified laboratories,
the only dependable source for such information would appear to be
properly qualified laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Water Supply Branch has determined to
carry out a study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems
most likely to be affected by industrial contamination.
Involved Characters:
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Update:
The States and utilities involved (30) have been informed in writing of
the study plan and sampling schedule. The first round of sampling will
be completed in April with Central Regional Laboratory analyses to be
completed by mid-June.
4/79
-------
IV 6
State Minnesota
n. . . Water Division
Division
Branch Water Supply Branch
Date June 6, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
TWIN CITIES SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER PETITION DECISION DEFERRED
ISSUE UPDATE
In response to a petition submitted by the Minnesota Department of Health requesting
that the Twin Cities metropolitan area's aquifer system be designated a Sole Source
Aquifer (SSA), Region V has conducted a public hearing, reviewed written comments,
and prepared a response to the subject petition. Water Division's recommendation
is to defer is to defer a final decision regarding designation until three hydrogeologic
studies underway by USGS are completed in mid to late 1980. It is the opinion of
the WD that the Twin Cities aquifer system is a SSA but that supporting documentation
attendant to the decision is lacking at this time.
BACKGROUND
In order to highlight the sensitive nature of the Twin Cities aquifer system the
MnOH submitted the above mentioned petition. Significant opposition was raised at
the public hearing and in written comments. The reasons for the opposition were
(1) poor coordination by MnDH and to some extent poor notice by USEPA, (2) lack of
final regulations governing the SSA program and RCRA, and (3) feelings on the part
of State agencies that the increment of protection would be minimal and delays would
result as a result of increased project reviews.
PERCEPTION OF THE ISSUE:
Since WD feels that the aquifer system will prove to be a SSA, it is our intention
to actively pursue program coordination so as to be ready to proceed once all
pertinent data is available and a decision regarding delegation is possible. Much
of the opposition is based on unknowns which will be eliminated by the time a decision
is made. As a result of the petition much attention has already been focused on the
aquifer system and aggressive coordination will continue to emphasize the need to
protect this resource.
INVOLVED CHARACTERS
Minnesota Department of Health (Pauline Bouchard)
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Dale Wikre)
Metropolitan Council
Region V, WSB (Rich Bartelt)
-------
I
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of -Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 2/27/80
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $601,873
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount.-$502,580
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative enforcement grant is to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture
to (l)enforce sections 7, 8, &9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforce-
ment program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring of indus-
try and user groups.
The semi-annual review was conducted on April 13-14, 1980. The report supports
the competence of the state to meet all program commitments.
-------
State of Vinn8sota
DIVI ST.")?!: Air and Hazardous /'aterials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 4QC3 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sept. 28, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 907,000 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 245,800 (actual)
(Actual_ or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federa"! criteria, and development of State Solid Haste s!anagemant Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet
certain planning requirements in che regulations in order to remain eligible ror
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based ucon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
-------
STATUS PCP^y - 3R.\,TS ''!D/C'R GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of ,''i ,'inosota--Ci ty of St. Paul
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous "'aterials Hivisicn
BPvA'i'CH: Waste ''ananenertt Brancn
Authorizing Section/Law: 4C03(a) (2 ) /°esource Conservation and Recovery Act
date Qf Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 593,390
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 374,167
(Actual or prcoosed)
Population served: 300,000
Trief description of project or program covered:
St. Paul has Deceived a U.S. Oepartr.ont of Cner^y grant to develop a denonstrat :'on
hot water district heating syste-i. U.S. EPA's Urban Policy cooperative agreement
includes a feasibility study which will examine the passibility of incorporating
resource recovery fron solid waste into the district heating concept.
The City has hi'-eri a project manager and is currently foming a Working Task Force.
SFP's for consultant assistance are being reviewed by the City.
-------
STAT"C REPORT - ~r)/l''~r£ VOX1"*0 CO
-------
STATUS REPORT -__GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of MinnesotaCity of St. Paul
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH.- Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $98,890
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $74,167
(Actual or proposed)
Population served: 300,000
Brief description of project or program covered:
St. Paul has received a U.S. Department of Energy grant to develop
a demonstration hot water district heating system. U.S. EPA's Urban
Policy cooperative agreement includes a feasibility study which will
examine the possibility of incorporating resource recovery from
solid waste into the district heating concept. Concurrent landfill
report completed. Consultant report to be completed by July, 1980.
EPA is processing a grant amendment to include a source separation
study.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AflO/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of MinnesotaCity of St. Paul
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Hi vision
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 400S(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 593,890
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $74,167
(Actual or prcoosed)
Population served: 300,000
^rief description of project or program covered:
St. Paul has received a U.S. Department of Energy grant to develop a demonstration
hot water district heating system. U.S. EPA's Urban Policy cooperative agreement
includes a feasibility study which will examine the passibility of incorporating
resource recovery from solid waste into the district heating concept.
The City has hired a project manager and is currently forming a Working Task Force.
RFP's for consultant assistance are being reviewed by the City.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRAHTS A?!D/0? GRANT APPLICATION'S
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Haste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sept. 28, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 448,000 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 223,200 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by
Section 3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific
time, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the
program in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature
include: resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and
manifest system development; expansion of surveillance and enforcement programs;
public participation; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - C^A*!TS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Haste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sept. 28, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 907,000 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 245,800 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is av/arded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must ;neet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 2/27/80
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $601,873
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $502,580
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative enforcement grant - grant is to the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture
to (1) enforce sections 7, 8 and 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state
enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring
of industry and user groups.
The state has agreed to monthly reporting of grant outputs.
The final group training session will be held March 27 and 28.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS RCPQPJ - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State af MinnesotaCity of St. Paul ;. . ..- .
DIVISION: Air.and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
598,890
$74,167
Brief description, of project or program covered:
The City is concurrently negotiating a grant in excess of $1 m.illion with
the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a demonstration hot water district
heating system. St. Paul's cooperative agreement will be a feasibility study
to examine how resource recovery from solid waste might be incorporated into
the district heating concept. Coordination with solid waste/resource recovery
planning efforts of the Twin Cities Metro Council and Hennepin County
(Minneapolis) will be stressed.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do* pot, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
J'"1 .*/
>~->'t
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
JAN 3
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: application received 10/T/79. State has requested amendment.
(Actual or anticipated) Pesticides Branch is reviewing amendment.
Total Project Cost: $601,873
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $511,592 This figure will be reduced by about $100 K
(Actual or proposed) because of lack of sufficient funds to support this grant.
Brief description of project or program'covered:
Cooperative enforcement grant - grant is to the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture
to'(l) enforce sections 7, 8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state
enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring
of industry and user groups.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, pianniKg agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
J9SO
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota _
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
1 »
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sent. 28. 1979 (actual) . *
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 907,000
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 245,^0
or proposed)
Brief description of project or program' covered :
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities
based on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management
Plans, as defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States
must meet certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain
eligible for funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identi-
fication of responsible solid waste management agencies at all" levels of
government; development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal,
based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding
permits .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active ;'
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do no£ include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
1380
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRMTS Atm/CR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of
DIVISION: Air an
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sect. 28, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 907,000
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 245,R°Q
(Arti'al or proposed)
Brief description of project or program'covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities
based on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management
Plans, as defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States
must meet certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain
eligible for funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identi-
fication of responsible solid waste management agencies at all" levels of
government; development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal,
based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding
permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
. STATUS REPORT -.GRANTS AMP/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of ..MirnnftgQt.a
DIVISION: Ai-r ancl Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/La1.;: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Sept. 28 > 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 448,000
(Actual or proposed)'
Federal Grant Amount:
(Art"a3 or proposed) 223,200
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section
3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the program
in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature include:
resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system
development; expansion of surveillance an£ enforcement programs; public participa-
tion; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all 'project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do uo_t include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State af MinnesotaCity of St. Paul \ . /
DIVISION: Air.and Hazardous Materials Division '
BRANCH: ' Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
$98,890
$74,167
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
The City is concurrently negotiating a grant in excess of $1 million with
the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a demonstration hot water district
heating system. St. Paul's cooperative agreement will be a feasibility study
to examine how resource recovery from solid waste might be incorporated into
the district heating concept. Coordination with solid waste/resource recovery
planning efforts of the Twin Cities Metro Council and Hennepin County
(Minneapolis) will be stressed.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not; include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
*
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
s.TATus_1L^:J:1T "__c'\i'i"^ '"'-'."- '"-\if "'-I'ATjo,
State CK _M_innesqta_
DIVISIO'i: Air & Hazardous Materials
BP-,, 1 : Pesticides
Autho^i-ing Section/Lav/: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date or A\:ard: application received 10/1/79
To-1 :--.;ject CusL: $601,873
$511 ,592
Cooperative enforcement grant - grant is to the Minnesota Department of
Agriculture to (1) enforce sections 7, 8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade
the state enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the
monitoring of industry and user groups.
-------
STATUS REPORT.- GRANTS ANfl/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota City' of St. Paul \ . ..-
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
$98,890
$74,167
Brief description of project or program covered:
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
The City is concurrently negotiating a grant in excess 'of $1 million with
the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a demonstration hot water district
heating system. St. Paul 's' cooperative agreement will be a feasibility study
to examine how resource recovery from solid waste might be incorporated into
the district heating concept. Coordination with solid waste/resource recovery
planning efforts of the Twin Cities Metro Council and Hennepin County
(Minneapolis) will be stressed.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.nthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local "agencies, "planning agencies, others)
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
,
- ;v" '{ ""**" '.''I ' '-** * -''." "-"'
-------
State of Minnesota
DiVISTl',: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
Gr~ . Pesticides
:-ing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
unable to anticipate
$601,373
$511,592
Cooperative enforement grant - grant is to the Minnesota Department of
Agriculture to (1) enforce sections 7, 8, & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade
the state enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the
monitoring of industry and user groups.
Grant application received 10/1/79, no apparent problems.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Minnesota
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divi-sion
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: February 23, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $909,170
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $250,422
(Artnal or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities
based on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management
Plans, as defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States
must meet certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain
eligible for funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identi-
fication of responsible solid waste management agencies at all" levels of
government; development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal,
based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding
.permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do nai include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of _ .Minnesota _
DIVISION: Air an^ Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: February 23, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $348,566
(Actual or proposed)'
Federal Grant Amount: $180,140
or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-' covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section
3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the program
in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature include:
resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system
development; expansion of surveillance anu enforcement programs; public participa-
tion; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local YgencuiS,~plannfng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPOPT - G''"','T"3 AT'/G^ G::-V
-------
SIS UPDATE
LOG
OHIO
(state)
MONTH
JULY
YEAR 1979
Last UPDATE Issued In:
PART I
Environmental Agencies
Executive Branch
Legislative Branch
Agencies, Commissions
and Boards
Public Interest Groups
State Environmental
Legislation
PART II
Regional Program Staff
PART III
IRANI STATUS REPORT
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV A GRANTS /APPL
FEB
MARCH
APRII
MAI
JUNE
JULY
1
2-4a
5-8
9-11
5
1-15
AUC
SEPP
OCT
NOV
-
DEC
1
JAN
!
File at beginning of the appropriate state section, replacing previous log.
J'JL
197'
-------
OH 1 a
O
z
LU
o
cc
Qu
UJ
S
Z
O
CC
>
LU
O
X
o
2/79
-------
OH I 1
OHIO EPA GRANT AGENCIES
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
361 East Broad Street
P. 0. Box 1049
Columbus, Ohio 43216
OEPA District Offices
Northeast District Northwest District
2110 E. Aurora Road 1035 Deviac Grove Drive
Twinsburg, Ohio 44087 Bowling Green, Ohio 43402
(216) 425-9171 (419) 352-8461,
Southeast District Southwest District
Rt. 3, Box 353 7 East Fourth Street
Logan, Ohio 43138 Dayton, Ohio 45402
(614) 385-8501 (513) 461-4670
Central District
369 E. Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 466-6450
Ohio Department of Agriculture
713 State Departments Building
65 S. Front Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Departmentof Agriculture Laboratories
Reynoldsburg, Ohio, 43068
Ohio Air Pollution Control Local Agencies
Air Pollution Control
177 South Broadway
Akron, Ohio 44308
(216) 375-2480
Air Pollution Control Division
Canton City Health Department
2nd Floor, City Hall
Canton, Ohio 44702
(216) 455-8951, ext. 231
Division of Air Pollution Control
2400 Beekman Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45214
(513) 352-4880
Division of Air Pollution Control
Department of Public Health
and Welfare
2735 Broadway Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 694-3310
-------
OH I 2
Ohio Air Pollution Control Local Agencies ( continued)
Regional Air Pollution
Control Agency
Montgomery County Health Dept.
451 West Third Street
Dayton, OHio 45402
(513) 225-4435
Department of Pollution Control
200 West Erie Avenue, 7th floor
Lorain, Ohio 44052
(216) 244-6718
Mansfield-Richland County
Health Department
600 West Third Street
Mansfield, Ohio 44906
Lake County Combined General
Health District
121 Liberty Street
Painesville, Ohio 44077
(215) 352-0766
Portsmouth City Health Dept
740 Second Street
Portsmouth, OHio 45662
(614) 354-6637
North Ohio Valley Air Authority
814 Adams Street
Steubenville, Ohio 43952
(614) 282-3908 or 3303
Toledo Pollution Control Agency
26 Main Street
Toledo, Ohio 43605
(419) 247-6524
Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution
Control Agency
Central Tower Building, Rm. 404
11 Central Square
Youngstown, Ohio
(216) 744-1928
2/79
-------
OH I 3
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
KEY PERSONNEL
Operational Responsibilities
Director
Assistant Director
James F. McAvoy
Rex Sprague
Air Program Chuck Taylor
(Office of Air Pollution Control)
Water Quality Ernie Rotering
(Office of Wastewater Pollution)
Water Supply James Kneale
(Office of Public Water Supply)
Solid Waste Don Day
(Office of Land Pollution Control)
Office of District
Operations
Ernie Neal
Office of Environmental
Planning Coordination Carl Wilhelm
Office of Operational
Support Gay Whitney
Staff Responsibilities
Assistant to the
Director
Legislative Liaison
Environmental Legal
Adviser
Div. of Intergovern-
mental and Ind. Rel.
Division of Finance
Public Interest
Officer
Personnel Officer
Emergency Response
Group
Jim Guthrie
Patterson Pepple
Steve Reilly
Charles Wilhelm
Bob Stewart
Al Franks
Tom Olander
Ken Schultz
Acting Chief
Chief
Chief
Chief
Chief
Planning
Sees. 208 & 106
Data Systems
Internal Admin.
Director
Director
8-942-8318
8-942-7785
8-942-6116
8-942-7427
8-942-8307
8-942-8934
8-942-5664
8-942-7232
8-942-8595
8-942-7785
8-942-6324
8-942-3491
8-942-7220
8-942-8321
8-942-8508
8-942-8649
8-942-6542
2/79
-------
OH I 4
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF OHIO
Mailing Address:
State House
Columbus, Ohio 43215
GOVERNOR
James A. Rhodes (R)
FTS 8-942-3526
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR George Voinavich (R)
FTS 8-942-3396
ATTORNEY GENERAL William J. Brown (D) FTS 8-942-4320
30 E. Broad Street
17th floor
Columbus, Ohio 43218
SECRETARY OF STATE Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr. (D) FTS 8-942-2530
30 E. Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43218
2/79
-------
LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES OF OHIO
Congressional Delegation
OH I 5
UNITED STATES SENATE - OHIO
Howard M. Metzenbaum (D)
121 E. State Street, Room 442
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(202) 224-2315
Steve Pruitt, Administrative Officer
(614)469-6774
John Glenn, Jr. (D)
200 N. High St., Room 600
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(202) 224-3353
ETS 8-932-6600
John Kinsellagh, Admin. Officer
UNITED STATES CONGRESS - OHIO
By District
1 Willis D. Gradison, Jr.
2 Thomas A. Luken
3 Tony P. Hall
4 Tennyson Guyer
5 Delbert L. Latta
6 Wm. H. Harsha
7 Clarence J. Brown
8 Thomas N. Kindness
9 Thomas Ludlow Ashley
10 Clarence E. Miller
11 J. Wm. Stanton
12 Samuel L. Devine
13 Donald J. Pease
14 John F. Seiberling
15 Chalmers P. Wylie
16 Ralph Regula
17 John M. Ashbrook
19 Lyle Williams
20 Mary Rose Dakar
21 Louis Stokes
22 Charles A. Vanik
23 Ronald M. Mottl
R Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
D Dayton
R Findlay
R Blng Green
R Portsmouth
R Urbana
R Hamilton
D Maumee
R Lancaster
R Painesville
R Columbus
D Oberlin
D Akron
R Columbus
R Navarre
R Johnstown
R N.Bloomfield
D Cleveland
D Warrensville
Heights
D Euclid
D Parma
By Name
Applegate, Douglas
Ashbrook, John M.
Ashley, Thomas L.
Brown, Clarence J.
Devine, Samuel L.
Gradison, Willis D.
Guyer, Tennyson
Hall, Tony P.
Harsha, William H.
Kindness, Thomas N.
Latta, Delbert L.
Luken, Thomas A.
Miller, Clarence F.
Mottl, Ronald M.
Dakar, Mary Rose
Pease, Donald J.
Regula, Ralph
Seiberling
Stokes, Louis
Vanik, Charles A.
Wylie, Chalmers P.
Williams, Lyle
Jr.
D
R
D
R
R
R
R
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
D
R
D
D
D
R
R
18
17
9
7
12
1
4
3
6
8
5
2
10
23
20
13
16
14
21
22
15
19
2/79
-------
OH I 6
HALL
OHIO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
96th U. S. CONGRESS 1979-1980
20. DAKAR 21. STOKES 22. VANIK
ASH3RCGK
17
UESNSEY I BEUMONT
PPLEGATE
JNOBLE 1"^"^^;;
HE
3'gT GREENE -j
LUKEN
GRADISON
U. S. CQHGRESSIOHAL DISTRICTS
ERLINC
2/79
-------
OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY - 113th
OH I 7
STATE SENATE - OHIO
FTS 8-942-2000
1 M. Ben Gaeth.
2 Paul E. Gillmor
3 Theodore M. Gray
4 Donald E, Lukens
5 Neal F. Zimmers, Jr.
6 Charles J. Curran
7 Richard H. Finan
8 Stanley J. Aronoff
9 Win. F. Bowen
10 John K. Mahoney
11 Marigene Valiquette
12 Walter L. White
13 Ronald L. Nabakowski
14 William H. Mussey
15 John R. Kasich
16 Michael Schwarzwalder
17 Oakley C. Collins
18 Marcus A. Roberto
19 Thomas A. Van Meter
20 Sam Speck
21 M. Morris Jackson
22 Anthony 0. Calabrese
23 Charles L. Butts
24 Jerome Stano
25 Paul R. Matia
26 Paul E. Pfeifer
27 Oliver Ocasek
28 Kenneth R. Cox
29 Thomas F. Walsh
30 Ronald K. Milleson
31 J.Timothy McCormack
32 Thomas E. Carney
33 Harry Meshel
By District
R Defiance
R Port Clinton
R Columbus
R Middletown
D Dayton
D Dayton
R Cincinnati
R Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
D Springfield
D Toledo
R Lima
D Lorain
R Batavia
R Columbus
D Columbus
R Ironton
D Ravenna
R Ashland
R New Concord
D Cleveland
D Cleveland
D Cleveland
D Parma
R Westlake
R Bucyrus
D Northfield
D Barberton
R Canton
D Freeport
D Euclid
D Girard
D Youngstown
By Name
Aronoff, Stanley J.
Bowen, William F.
Butts, Charles L.
Calabrese, Anthony 0.
Carney, Thomas E.
Collins, Oakley
Cox, Kenneth R.
Curran, Charles J.
Gaeth, M. Benjamin
Gillmor, Paul E.
Gray, Theodore M.
Jackson, Morris M.
Kasich, John R.
Lukens, Donald E.
Mahoney, John K.
Maloney, Michael J.
Matia, Paul R.
McCormack, John T.
Meshel, Harry
Milleson, R. Kinsey
Mussey, R. Kinsey
Nabakowski, Ronald
Ocasek, Oliver
Pfeifer, Paul E.
Roberto, Marcus A.
Schwarzwalder, Michael
Speck, Sam
Stano, Jerome
Valiquette, Marigene
Van Meter, Thomas A.
Walsh, Thomas P.
White, Walter L.
Zimmers, Neal F., Jr.
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
R
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
R
R
R
D
8
9
23
22
32
17
28
6
1
2
3
21
15
4
10
7
25
31
33
30
30
13
27
26
18
16
20
24
11
19
29
12
5
2/79
-------
OH I 8
OHIO SENATE DISTRICTS
113th OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1979-1980
21. JACKSON
22. CALA8RESE
23. BUTTS
24. STAND
5J4AJIA
UMAHON^ j
OHIO SENATE DISTRICTS
2/79
-------
OH I 9
113th OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY
House of Representatives
By District
1 Eugene Branstool
2 John P. Wargo
3 James E. Betts
4 Rocco J. Colonna
5 Francine M. Panehal
6 Patrick A. Sweeney
7 Kenneth A. Rocco
8 Benny Bonanno
9 Troy Lee James
10 Thomas M. Bell
11 Frank Mahnic, Jr.
12 Donna Pope
13 Ike Thompson
14 Mary 0. Boyle
15 John D. Thompson, Jr.
16 Harry J. Lehman
17 Matthew J. Hatchadorian
18 Dennis E. Eckart
19 Dale Van Vyven
20 Thomas A. Pottenger
21 Jerome F. Luebbers
22 Edith P. Mayer
23 William L. Ma-lory
24 Terry M. Tranter
25 Helen Rankin
26 Helen H. Fix
27 Alan E. Norris
28 C. William O'Neill
29 Les Brown
30 Mike Stinziano
31 Phale D. Hale
32 Dean Gonley
33 Don E. Gilmore
34 Edward J. Orlett
35 Tom Fries
36 C. J. McLin, Jr.
37 Paul R. Leonard
38 Robert L. Corbin
39 Vern F. Cook
40 Thomas C. Sawyer
41 Robert D. Nettle
42 Pete Crossland
43 Cliff Skeen
44 Irma Karmol
45 Casey C. Jones
46 Arthur Wilkowski
47 Barney Quilter
48 Richard F. Maier
49 Charles Red Ash
D Utica
D Lisbon
R Rocky River
D Brookpark
D Cleveland
D Cleveland
D Parma
D Cleveland
D Cleveland
D Cleveland
D Garfield Heights
R Parma
D Cleveland
D Cleveland Heights
D Cleveland
D Beachwood
R Mayfield
D Euclid
R Cincinnati
R Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
R Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
D Cincinnati
R Cincinnati
R Westerville
R Columbus
D Columbus
D Columbus
D Columbus
D Columbus
R Columbus
D Dayton
D Dayton
D Dayton
D Dayton
R Dayton
D Cuyahoga Falls
D Akron
D Barberton
D Akron
D Akron
R Toledo
D Toledo
D Toledo
D Toledo
R Massillon
R Canton
50 William J. Healy
51 Thomas P. Gilmartin
52 Joseph J. Vukovich III
53 J. Leonard Camera
54 John V. Bara
55 Robert A. Nader
56 Michael DelBane
57 William Donham
58 Michael A. Fox
59 Edward J. Hughes
60 David Hartley
61 Sherrod Brown
62 John A. Begala
63 James S. Zehner
64 Waldo Bennett Rose
65 Robert A. Taft II
66 Lawrence E. Hughes
67 Larry H. Christman
68 John E. Johnson
69 John A. Galbraith
70 Dave Johnson
71 Thomas J. Carney
72 Marie Tansey
73 Corwin Nixon
74 Dennis L. Wojtanowski
75 Charles R. Saxbe
76 Harry E. Turner
77 Bob McEwen
78 Rod Hughes
79 Larry W. Manahan
80 Dale Locker
81 Robert E. Netzley
82 Michael G. Oxley
83 Robert E. Brown
84 Frederick H. Deering
85 Gene Damschroder
86 Walter D. McClaskey
87 Harry C. Malott
88 Myrl H. Shoemaker
89 Vernal G. Riffe, Jr.
90 Don S. Maddux
91 Claire M. Ball, Jr.
92 Ronald H. James
93 William G. Batchelder
94 James Ross
95 Tom Johnson
96 William E. Hinig
97 Robert J. Boggs
98 Arthur R. Bowers
99 Wayne L. Hays
D Canton
D Youngstown
D Youngstown
D Lorain
D Elyria
D Warren
D Hubbard
R Middletown
R Hamilton
D Mentor
D Springfield
D Mansfield
D Kent
D Yellow Springs
R Lima
R Cincinnati
R Columbus
D Englewood
D Orrville
R Maumee
R North Canton
D Youngstown
R Vermilion
R Lebanon
D Newbury
R Mechanicsburg
R Mount Vernon
R Hillsboro
R Huntsville
R Defiance
D Anna
R Laura
R Findlay
R Perrysburg
D Monroeville
R Fremont
R Marion
D Mt. Orab
D Bourneville
D New Boston
D Lancaster
R Athens
D Proctorville
R Medina
R Dresden
R Cambridge
D New Philadelp
D Jefferson
D Steubenville
D Belmont
2/79
-------
OH I 10
House of Representatives
Ash, Charles Red
Ball, Claire M., Jr.
Bara, John V.
Batchelder, William
Begala, John A.
Bell, Thomas M.
Betts, James E.
Boggs, Robert J.
Bonanno, Benny
Bowers, Arthur R.
Boyle, Mary 0.
Branstool, Eugene
Brown, Les
Brown, Robert E.
Brown, Sherrod
Camera, J. Leonard
Carney, Thomas J.
Christman, Larry H.
Colonna, Rocco
Conley, Dean
Cook, Vernon
Corbin, Robert L.
Crossland, Pete
Cruze, Chester T.
Damschroder, Gene
Deering, Frederick H.
Del Bane, Michael
Donham, William
Eckart, Dennis E.
Finan, Richard H.
Fix, Helen H.
Fox, Michael A.
Fries, Tom
Galbraith, John A.
Gilmartin, Thomas P.
Gilmore, Don E.
Hale, Phale D.
Hartley, David
Hatchadorian, Matthew J.
Hays, Wayne L.
Healy, William J.
Hinig, William E.
Hughes, Edward J.
Hughes, Lawrence E.
Hughes, Rodney H.
James, Troy Lee
James, Ronald H.
Johnson, Dave
Johnson, John E.
Johnson, Thomas W.
Jones, Casey C.
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
D
D
R
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
D
R
D
R
D
49th
91st
54th
93rd
62nd
10th
3rd
97th
8th
98th
14th
1st
29th
83rd
61st
53rd
71st
67th
4th
32nd
39th
38th
42nd
22nd
85th
84th
56th
57th
18th
19th
26th
58th
35th
69th
51st
33rd
31st
60th
17th
99th
50th
96th
59th
66th
78th
9th
92nd
70th
68th
95th
45th
Karmol, Irma L.
Lancione, A. G.
Lehman, Harry J.
Leonard, Paul R.
Locker, Dale
Luebbers, Jerome F.
McClaskey, Walter D.
McEwen, Bob
McLin, D. J., Jr.
Maddux, Don S.
Mahnic, Fred
Maier, Richard F.
Mallory, William L.
Malott, Harry C.
Manahan, Larry W.
Nader, Robert A.
Nettle, Robert D.
Netzley, Robert E.
Nixon, Corwin M.
Norris, Alan E.
C. William O'Neill, Jr.
Orlett, Edward J.
Oxley, Michael G.
Panehal, Francine
Pope, Donna
Pottenger, Thomas A.
Quilter, Barney
Rankin, James W.
Riffe, Vernal G., Jr.
Rocco, Kenneth
Rose, Waldo Bennett
Ross, James
Sawyer, Thomas C.
Saxbe, Charles Rockwell
Shoemaker, Myrl H.
Skeen, Clifton
Stinziano, Mike
Sweeney, Patrick A.
Tablack, George D.
Taft, Robert A., II
Tansey, Marie
Thompson, Ike
Thompson, John D., Jr.
Tranter, Terry M.
Turner, Harry E.
Vukovich, Joseph J., Ill
Wargo, John P.
Wilkowski, Arthur
Wojtanowski, Dennis L.
Zehner, James S.
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
D
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
R
R
R
R
D
R
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
44th
99th
16th
37th
80th
21st
86th
77th
36th
90th
llth
48th
23rd
87th
79th
55th
41st
81st
73rd
27th
28th
34th
82nd
5th
12th
20th
47th
25th
89th
7th
64th
94th
40th
75th
88th
43rd
30th
6th
52nd
65th
72nd
13th
15th
24th
76th
52nd
2nd
46th
74th
63rd
2/79
-------
OHIO HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICTS
113th OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1979-1980
OH I 11
3. BETTS 7. ROCCO 11. MAHNIC 15. J. THOMPSON
4. COLONNA 8. 12. POPE 16. LEHMAN
5. PANEHAL 9. T. JAMES 13. I. THOMPSON 17. HATCHADORIAN
16. SWEENEY 10. BELL 14. BOYLE 18 ECKART.
MADE
44. KAKMUL
45. JONES
46.WILKOWSKI
47. OJJILTER _
HUGKE
VOJTANOWSK!
DAMSCHDER
SHELBY
ttlCKER
CHRISTMA
HARTLEY
VINTON 91 L
BALLL
148. MAIER
49. ASH
50. HEALY
BROWN I ADAMS
fllALOTT
. VAN VYVE
POTTENG;
. LUEBBER:
. MAYER
. MALLORY
. TRANTER
RANKIN
FIX
OHIO HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICTS
34. ORLETT
35. FRIES
37. LEONARD
38. CORBiN
27. NORRIS 31. HALE
'28. O'NEILL 32. CONLEY
29. L. BROWN 33. GILMORE
30. STINZIANO
2/79
-------
OH I 12
OHIO LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
OHIO SENATE
Finance Committee
FTS 8-942-8285
Chairman, Harry Meshel
Vice Chairman, R. Kinsey Milleson
Members:
William F. Bowen
Morris M. Jackson
Sam Speck
Jerome Stano
Marigene Valiquette
Stanley J. Aronoff
Thomas A. Van Meter
Agriculture, Conservation and Environment FTS 8-942-7586
Chairman, Jerome Stano
Vice Chairman, John T. McCormack
Members:
Kenneth R. Cox
John K. Mahoney
Neal F. Zimmers
M. Benjamin Gaeth
Energy and Public Utilities
Chairman: Kenneth R. Cox
Vice Chairman: R. Kinsey Milleson
Members:
Theodore M. Gray
R. Kinsey Mussey
Walter L. White
FTS 8-942-4538
Charles L. Butts
Anthony 0. Calabrese
Thomas E. Carney
Michael Schwarzwalder
Rules Committee
Chairman: Oliver Ocasek
Vice Chairman: Morris M. Jackson
Members:
William F. Bowen
Charles L. Butts
Anthnny Calabrese
Harry Meshel
Legislative Control Board
President: James R. Marsh
John R. Kasich
Paul E. Pfeifer
Thomas P. Walsh
FTS 8-942-4822
Marigene Valiquette
Paul Gillmor
Theodore M. Gray
Thomas Van Meter
FTS 8-942-4034
Members: Chairman and two members from both the Senate and House
Finance Committees. Approves budget transfers between line
items, all contracts over $10,000; issues spending authority
to agency for unanticipated Federal funds.
2/79
-------
OH I 13
OHIO LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Finance - Appropriations Committee
Myrl H. Shoemaker
William E. Hinig
Chairman:
Vice Chairman:
Members;
Christman
Crossland
Deering
Nader
Gilmartin
Jones
Sweeney
Panehal
War go
Energy and Environment Committee
8-942-5476
Stinziano
Boggs
J. Johnson
Mallory
McLin
*Rose
Betts
Fox
Karmol
Maier
Netzley
Taft
T. Johnson
Ball
Chairman:
Vice Chairman:
Members;
Bara
Branstool
Bonanno
Hays
Ed Hughes
Thomas J. Carney
John P. Wargo
Karmol*
McClaskey
T. Johnson
D. Johnson
8-942-7182
Agricultural and Natural Resources Committee
Chairman:
Vice Chairman:
Members'.
Les Brown
Hartley
Ron James
Malott
Zehner
Dale Locker
Eugene Branstool
McClaskey*
Damschroder
Manahan
Ross
8-942-6935
Economic Affairs and Federal Relations
Chairman:
Vice Chairman:
Members:
Hale
Hays
Troy Janes
Maddux
Wilkowski
Edward J. Orlett
Dennis C. Wojtanowski
*Maier
Betts
Rose
Tansey
8-942-8030
* Represents ranking minority member
2/79
-------
OHIO LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES OH I 14
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Public Utilities Committee
Chairman: Ron Janes 8-942-8010
Vice Chairman: Troy James
Members:
Carney *R. Hughes
Conley Corbin
Bell O'Neill
Fries T. Johnson
Woj tanowski
2/79
-------
OH I 15
OHIO
STATE AGENCY APPROPRIATION PROCESS
Appropriations are for the biennium, usually approved by June 30 of the first year
of each General Assembly for a two-year period beginning July 1 of that year.
The State agencies are required to submit their budget requests to the Governor's
Office of Budget and Management by September of each even-numbered year. OEM
issues instructions to the agencies on the format to be followed. In the FY 78-79
budget process, an attempt was made to use Zero Base Budgeting for the State budget,
with the agencies being given three assigned funding levels to be prepared. Between
September and December 1, OEM reviews the agency requests and negotiates revisions
prior to preparation and printing of the Governor's budget request which must be
submitted to the Legislature within four weeks after the beginning of the first
session of the next year. Although the bill can be submitted to either chamber, it
is traditionally submitted to the House. The process is very similar to the Federal
Government process, with the House sending its version of the bill to the Senate for
concurrence or amendment. If necessary because of the failure of one house to
accept the other's bill, a conference committee resolves the outstanding issues.
The appropriations bills should be effective by June 30 of the odd-numbered years,
but, if they are not yet enacted, the State agencies continue to operate on the
authority of short-term continuing resolutions passed by the General Assembly.
The agency budget requests include Federal dollars expected to be received during
the biennium, with the result that the State legislature actually "appropriates"
the expected Federal dollars.
Once the agency has received its appropriation, the legislature still retains some
control over expenditures through the operation of a statutory body called the
State Control Board. Although the President of the Control Board is from the Gover-
nor's Office of Budget and Management the membership is comprised of the Chairman and
two members from both the Senate and House Finance Committees. The Control Board has
extraordinary powers. They meet every two weeks to consider from 70-80 requests from
various agencies to modify their approved budgets in some way. OEPA originally re-
ceived a "block" budget, not broken out by organization or program. However, in
FY 1978, the legislature identified five or six agencies they felt had been uncoop-
erative in providing budget support or information requested by the legislature and
approved their budgets by line item, (by organization in the case of OEPA). This
meant that for any change between line items, e.g., from the Office of Air Pollution
Control to the Office of Land Pollution or between the two years of the budget, the
agency had to go before the Control Board. Because OEPA is organized along program
lines, this gives the legislature continuing control over any changes in program
emphasis. Even more important, however, is the fact that, once the agency comes to the
Control Board with a request, it is subject to "oversight" questioning by the Board
members on any subject they wish to raise. Approval of the budget revision request
can be used as a lever to produce results desired by the Board. As mentioned above,
the State appropriates expected Federal funds. Therefore, any unexpected increase in
Federal funds requires Board approval if Federal funds will then exceed the approved
spending authority, once again subjecting the agency to oversight interrogation.
2/79
-------
OH I 16
appropriation process - cont'd
In addition, if the spending authority increase is to cover a new activity, the
agency must first get an executive order from the Governor before requesting
Control Board approval.
Any contract involving services which exceeds $10,000 must have prior approval of
the Control Board. The Board has established 13 criteria to get contract approval.
The purpose of this requirement is to provide assurance to the legislature that
those contracts which are not let by competitive bidding procedures are negotiated
in such a way that all competent providers are considered and the winning contrac-
tor is selected for good reason.
At the end of the biennium, unspent appropriated State funds revert to the State
General Fund. The Ohio constitution prohibits spending authority beyond two years.
Unspent Federal funds are treated like a checkbook balance: The unspent prior auth-
orization is subtracted from the request for the next biennium and the final bill
will authorize the difference.
The State Control Board has its own appropriation (usually quite substantial) for
its use in allocation to the various agencies to cover activities not foreseen
during budget formulation. It is interesting that OEPA, which has drastically
reduced its various programs during periods of grant problems with U.S. EPA, has
never applied to the Control Board for supplementary funding. Such a request would,
of course, again subject OEPA to oversight interrogation by the Board.
2/79
-------
OH I 17
OHIO STATE LEGISLATURE
During the past biennium, the Democrats had a "veto-proof" majority in both
houses. As a result of the recent elections, the House remains unchanged at
62/37, but the Senate dropped to an 18/15 majority.
The legislature is biennial and is in continuous session except for recesses
determined by the General Assembly. Usually there are both summer and fall
recesses, and the new General Assembly meets early in the calendar year after
the election. The fiscal year ends June 30.
Bills can be initiated in either chamber - no constitutional or statutory limits.
There is no deadline for submission of new legislation although the Governor's
budget request should be submitted within four weeks of the opening of the first
session. There are limits on the kinds of legislation which can be introduced
during the second year of the legislature, but exceptions can be granted by
the General Assembly and it has been the recent practice to admit just about
everything.
The Governor can veto by line item only on bills containing appropriations. It
requires a 3/5 majority in both houses to override a veto but there is no time
limit on the General Assembly to produce an override.
2/79
-------
OH I 18
STATE AGENCIES - OHIO
OFFICE OF BUDGET AM) MANAGEMENT
30 E. Broad Street
(39th and 40th Floors)
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: William Wilkins
(614) 466-4034
FTS 8-942-4034
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
246 N. High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: Dr. John Ackerman
9-942-2253
Lab support and water supply contracts.
Lab support to other government agen-
cies. Through contacts with county
health departments, contracts to do
major inventories for the water
supply program.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
30 E. Broad Street, 34th floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: Robert Ryan
8-942-3465
Any questions of compromises required
because of energy crises; resource
recovery; alternative fuel sources.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Fountain Square, Building D
Columbus, Ohio 43224
Director: Dr. Robert Teater
8-942-3770
Land use planning (208, TCP's)
MiningDNR issues permits to mine-
OEPA is involved in control of acid mine
drainage.
DNR licenses boats-EPA involved in holding
tank requirements.
DNR responsible for parks and streams,
therefore interested in Water Quality
Standards and stream control.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
65 South Front Street
Columbus, Ohio 43218
Director: John Stackhouse
8-942-2732
Grantee for US EPA Pesticide
grants. DNR and EPA interface
with Agriculture on agricul-
tural run-off. Grain drying
facilities involve air pollu-
tion control. Sludge dis-
posal on land. "Industrial
farms." Strip mine reclama-
tion and rehabilitation of old
mining sites.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
30 E. Broad Street, 25th floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: James Duerk
8-942-3379
Interest in economic possibil-
ities of various environmental
programs, e.g., Great Lakes
winter navigation program
which benefited Ohio ports.
Director and the Governor work
together to see that proposed
new industry can be accomodated
within environmental contraints.
OHIO AIR QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
50 West Broad Street, Suite 1901
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: Gary L. Ewing
8-942-6825
OHIO WATER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
50 West Broad Street, Suite 2340
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Director: E. B. Ransom
8-942-5822
Both Authorities market bonds
to provide low interest capital
to industries to install pollu-
tion control equipment.
2/79
-------
OH I 19
OHIO COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS
POWER SITING COMMISSION
361 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43216
8-942-6422
Members: (5)
Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency CHAIRMAN
Chairman, Public Utilities Commission
Robert Redmond, Governor's Representative
Director, Department of Health
Director, Economic and Community Development Authority
GREAT LAKES COMMISSION
2200 Bonisteel Boulevard
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Members:
John A. McWilliam, Governor's designee, Toledo-Lucas Port Authority
Director, Department of Natural Resources
1 Senator
1 Representative
GREAT LAKES BASIN COMMISSION
3475 Plymouth Road
P. 0. Box 999
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
Members:
Ohio Commissioner: Jones F. McAvoy
1st Alternate: Dr. Teater, Dept. of Natural Resources
2nd Alternate: Carl Wilhelm, Ohio EPA
Note: Ohio is currently in arrears on dues therefore no vote
OHIO RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
36 East Fourt Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Members:
Ohio Commissioner: Dr. Teater, Dept. of Natural Resources
1st Alternate: Jones E. McAvoy
2nd Alternate: William Nichols, DNR
Note: Ohio is currently in arrears on dues - no vote.
2/79
-------
OH I 20
ORSANCO
Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission
414 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Jones F. McAvoy, Ohio EPA
Mrs. Christine Carlson
Lloyd Clausing
LEGISLATIVE CONTROL BOARD
Slate House
Columbus, Ohio 43215
8-942-4034
President: Office of Budget and Management
Members: Chairman and two members from both the Senate and the
House Finance Committees.
Approves all budget transfers between line items, all
contracts over $10,000; issues spending authority to
agency for unanticipated Federal funds
GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY BOARD
of the
INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION
1717 H St., N.W. Room 203
Washington D.C. 20440
Director, OEPA, ex-officio member
BOARD OF UNRECLAIMED STRIP MINE LANDS
State House
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Chairman: Representative Art Bowers
Members: Senator
Representatives from both the DNR and OEPA
Board members help to select projects with the Bureau of
Reclamation for receipt of State grants to reclaim all
mine sites.
Environmental Board of Review
395 E. Broad Street, Ste 305
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Thomas M. Phillips, Chairman
Sherman L. Frost, Vice-Chairman
George D. Tablock, Member
8-942-8950
2/79
-------
OH I 21
OHIO
PUBLIC INTEREST GROUPS
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES
Wm. A. Lloyd, Executive Vice President
1040 Leader Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
(216) 861-3100
CINCINNATI INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE
2495 Langdon Farm Rd.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45237
Donald M. Standriff, Exec. Mgr
(513) 731-2211
GREATER CLEVELAND GROWTH ASSOCIATION
690 Union Commerce Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
(216) 621-3300
John H. Lathe, President
IZAAK WATON LEAGUE
P. 0. Box 724
Tiffin, Ohio
Ed Schcke'lhoff, Exec. Sec.
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO
1445 Meadow Lane
Yellow Springs, Ohio 45387
Chris Carlson
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO
5731 Caranor Dr.
Kent, Ohio 44240
Edit Chase
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Irene Probasco, Natural Res. Dir.
(614) 861-0645
(614)
NATIONAL ASSOC. OF MANUFACTURERS
801 Northland Towers
Southfield, Michigan 40875
Nelson Morrow, Regional Manager
(313) 569-2050
NATIONAL ASSN OF MANUFACTURERS
Midwest Office
Park Ridge, II
Alyce Brunke
Phil D'Appley
(312) 698-3838
OHIO ENV. HEALTH ASSN.
430 Park Boulevard
Worthington, Ohio 43085
Tom Magoto, President
OHIO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
41 South High Street, Suite 105
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Colleen Woods
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
850 Michigan Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 42315
Steve Sedam
(614) 221-0898
OHIO LUNG ASSOCIATION
850 Michigan Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Braxton Tewart
OHIO SIERRA CLUB
65 S. Fourth Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Kat Duffy
OHIO TRUCKING ASSOCIATION
41 S. High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614)221-5375
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
One Sunset Hill
Granville, Ohio 43023
Dr. Bob Alrutz, President
OHIO ELECTRIC UTILITY INSTITUTE
40 South 3rd Street
Columbus, Ohio
(614) 221-3422
RIVERS UNLIMITED
816 Van Ness Dr.
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
(513) 771-5087
Mike Fremont
STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
17 South High Street, 8th Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Rosemary Martin
(614) 228-4201
2/79
-------
OH I 22
Ohio Public Interest Groups - cont'd
STATE MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION
100 E. Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Doug Trail
(614) 224-5111
UNITED MINE WORKERS, DISTRICT #6
38th and Jefferson
Bellaire, Ohio 43906
(614) 676-3972
Charles Grimm
WILDLIFE LEGISLATIVE FUND
50 W. Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
James Glass
2/79
-------
OH I 23
OHIO
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
Programs Ohio Revised Code
Air Pollution Control 3704.01 through 3704.99
Water Pollution Control and
Public Water Supply 6111.01 through 6111.99
Solid Waste 3734.01 through 3734.99
Pesticides 921.01 through 921.99
Agency (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency) 3745.01 through 3745.09
2/79
-------
OH II 1
- ^ o a
d 1 S. §:5
s-33 =rg
23J S|
J J 5
§ «*
I Is 2"
_i i
_O V *i
3 to so
2
UJ
oc
>2
z«o
25
o
o
<
oc
o
cc
a.
I
111
« on x<
o) -
rt «5
c i
C
oi
^ to
3 -o
s i
-------
KEY *
G = Guidance
D - Draft
C - Reg. Comments
F - Final
Date
USEPA - REGION V
GRANT STATUS REPORTS *
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - Part III
May 1980
III 1
State
OHIO
A Awara
E = Evaluation
Jan
AIR POLLUTION Planned
CONTROL Actual
(Section 105) Comments
SOLID WASTE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
Comments
HAZARDOUS Planned
WASTE Actual
MANAGEMENT Comments
WATER Planned
POLLUTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
(Section 106)
PUBLIC Planned
WATER Actual
SUPERVISION Comments
UNDERGROUND Planned
INJECTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
STATE Planned
ASSISTANCE Comments
(Section 205g)
WATER Planned
QUALITY Actual
PLANNING Comments
(Section 208)
Feb
Mar
Apr
A
May
G
R
June
July
D
Aug
C
n
Sept
F
Oct
A
n
Mov
F
R '->
C +->
r-a o
Dec $ M $<
i
G
t
A
D
C
F
D
A
c
620!
F
G
E
A
D
C
F
D
A
C
IS33!
F
E
G
D/C
F
A
Fiscal Year 80 Allocation $1,860,000
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - $952,300
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - $129,700 Grant will be awareded to Ohio DNR;
Ohio EPA will act as a subcontractor for Class I, IV, and V wells.
_
_
r * t i i j
1 >
I I , , , ..
f. i - i 1 i 1 ! . i , .
tr^s^Sr^r^i
_C";I ^H'd ?.£ CUXCX
" "* O CcT? *v b-Tr* *- ^ ^ ^
R
;=-
A
i
* Indicate KEY letters for each grant. Utilize all KEY letters on "Planned" line
2/79 and, as steps are completed, indicate key letters on "Actual" line.
-------
:tace Ohio
AIR PROGRAMS BRANCH - EPA REGIOII V . Month _Apri1 , 1980
I.
SANCTIONABLE SIPS
CRITERIA
POLLUTANTS
APPKOVAEII
ISSUES
ANTICIPATED RESOLUTION
NATURE
DATE
TSP
Major Approvabilit)
Issues: TSP Sip not yet submitted. T,heir method of regulating
nmcess fugitives may not be enforceable.
cry
W»J,
USEPA ftas promulgated a plan for Summit County on Decembe
03/CO/N02
Stationary Source fiACT: Major Approvabilitv Issues: Cor
RACT regulations for vapor recovery - EPA proposed disao
extension for affected loading racks.
I/M j
Major A:pro-,£r-T-;~v Issues: No legal authority. A bill
considers this z'.'.l to be adequate legal authority. An
been rrade which f.z'z substance similar to the Texas SIP s
a pilot program, j
was introduced. EPA
/M SIP submittal has
jbmittal, but without
Transportation PTahm'ng
Major Approv
aMMzy
Issues: None
i
5, 1979
pliance time for loading
roval of comoliance schedule
II.
STATIOSZ2T SC'JSCE PERMITS
PSD
COMPLETION DETERMINATIONS
NUMBER CCI-IrLZTE
THIS MONTH
0
NUMBER
OVERDUE
1
FINAL DETERMINATIONS
YEAR
TO
DATE
5
THIS
MONTH
1
INCOMPLETE:
IN-HOUSE FOR: 6
UP TO
120 DAYS
0 '
0
120 TO
180 DAYS
2*
0
OVER 6
MONTHS
4*
0
III. DELEGATIONS ACCOMPLISHED THIS MONTH:
Has full PSD delegation
2/79
* Application on inactive status pending additional information.
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS III 3
Part III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT Stafce Omo
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V Month MAY 1980
I. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Status of State Efforts to Prepare for Open Dump Inventory (narrative)
Actively engaged in information gatherina activities as part of
Discing program prior to actual inventory which began this Spring. _
B. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Regions
Completed January 25, 1978.
C. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Agency
Completed May 19, 1978.
II. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Has state expressed intention to seek authorization to operate the
program? X Yes No Comments; Correspondence recei ved from
Director, Ohio EPA.
B. Does legislative authority exist for the program? X Yes No
If no, comment:
C. Status of state regulations development; Regulation expected to be
promulgated in September. Public hearing was held in early March.
III. STATUS OF URBAN RESOURCE RECOVERY GRANTS
Cuyahoga Countygrant Aug." 2, 1979, Montgomery Countygrant Sept. 27,
1979, Toledo Metro COGgrant Aug. 20, 1979.
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (narrative) Ohio has no State noise program. Ohio
has the largest number of communities in Region V interested in (cont'd.)
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (narrative) All of the Region V State
Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) have to be reviewed (cont'd.)
2/79
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATE OH 10
PART III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT MONTH,
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V ^
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (cont'd.) -<^
local noise control program. The USEPA is presently trying to
establish a State ECHO (an assistance program through which the State
would support communities with Federal funding). We provide assistance
in the development of local noise control programs. We are also-
providing technical assistance, equipment loans and training. Cooperative
agreements were awarded to the following:
State of Ohio: $27,293 to survey noise problems in 12 communities and--
review existing State legislation to determine whether changes are
necessary.
Akron, Ohio: $12,000 to establish a noise control capability with
emphasis on the control of motor vehicle noise.
Mentor, Ohio: $2,200 to develop and promulgate objective acoustical
standards for effective enforcement of the City's noise control ordinance.
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (cont'd.)
again using the Federal Emergency Management Administration's (FEMA)
revised criteria. A State visit has been made with Ohio. A meeting to
review the revised Ohio Plan will be held May 19-20, 1980.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - III
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PESTICIDES BRANCH - EPA V
State
OH
III 4
Month April
I. ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT:
Status of Grant Draft Application rec'd 5/2/80
Amount of Grant $538,393 (proposed)
Enforcement
Activities
Use Inspections
Producer Esta^1 i <=^ments
EPA
This
Month'
3
i ., - . ~ - i\
Inspected . -
Producer Establishment
Samples Collected
Marketplace Samples
Collected
Import
Investigations
Civil Complaints
Notices of Arrival
Reviewed
Import Detentions
Stop Sale, Use or
Removal Orders
Criminal Referrals
Recalls Initiated
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year
to
Dai- P.
12
46
37
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
Comm-
itment
54
70
0
0
STATE
This
Month
0
0
0 '
0
lear
to
Bar?
0
0
0
0
Commi-
:tnent
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
This
Month
3
4
0
0
Year r
to hc ~
Dat-p --- = --
12 54
46 70
37 0
3 0
II. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ., _ . . . , .,,,,
Mid-year Evaluation conducted 4/24/80
Amount of Grant $37,100 (proposed)Formal application rec'd 3/18/80
Status of Training Program Activity:No activity
III Quantify and describe indicators of health problems reported as result of
pesticides misuse during month: none
IV. Special local Need Requests Received: 1 rec'd in April; 4 rec'd year to date
2/79
-------
Ill 5
^ - REGION V
REGIONAL PRD33AM ST\TU3 REPORT
SR - P2\RT III
ENGINEERING
SIS
STATE Ohio
DATE May 5, 1980
page 1 of 2 page(s)
PROJECT NME
(list)
SCHEDULE DELAY
ORIG CURRENT RECENT CUMULATIVE
(weeks) (mos)
REASON FOR D31AY
(Recant/Cumulative)
Nettle Lake
D 5/73
3/30
27
Cleveland
Southwest
laterceot or
0 12/77
9/30
33
D - Draft
F - Final
Recent - Delays since previous report
Recent-No resoonse froti con
tracts on January request
for additional funds to
eKanine new alternative.
Other Region V contract
changes have taken a
higher priority.
Cunulative-Oelays in con-
tracts review and
approval of additional
funding. Change in EI3
consultant project
manager. Oevalop'ttant of
"niiiTial action" alterna-
tive for septic tank and
privy putip-outs prior to
flooding, "forking on
developing a "-tiininnal
action" alternative.
Low Priority compared
to other "7 Lakes"
projects, which are being
completed first. Delays
in receiving Consultant's
Reports. Problems in
obtaining timely contracts
and revisions to contracts,
Additional data require-
ments to augment needs
documentation and develop-
ment of alternative
technologies such as land
application, and on-lot
or cluster systems.
Recent-Continued delays in
obtaining Facilities Plan-
ning information. Cumu-
lative-Delays in Facili-
ities Planning. Delays
in obtaining El3 Facilitie
Plan chaoters.
-------
Ill 5
5P\ - R
REGIOtf^L PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
III
315
Ohio
May 5, 1930
page 2 of 2 page(s)
PROJECT
(list)
SCHEDULE
ORIG
DELAY
RECENT CUMULATIVE
(weeks) (TIPS)
REASON FOR OBIA?
Receat/Cu.nulative)
Cuyahoga
Valley
Interceotor
0 9/79
10/80
13
Sxtsasi/3 additions
to facilities plaa-
aiTj ace necassacy.
Delays in obtaining
data development
in facilities plan;
pc i-nac ily fcoti the
I/I analysis.
umulative-Facilities
Plan anticipated Oct.
1980. This is a
piggy-back EI3. The
>TE Ohio Regional Sewer
Distcict is experienc-
ing delays in facilities
planning.
D-Dcaft
rFinal
cent - Delays since orevious ceoort
-------
USEPA'- REGION V
WATER - SIS PART III
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT FORM
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
III 7
State OHIO
Month MAY19SO
I.
208
208 Agencies
(list)
Status of (For example, has the plan been certified?
208 Plan approval granted by EPA? dollars amount of
ongoing grant? general scope of effort?
outstanding issues? If in house, when will
review be completed? Is anyone holding up review?
OKI
TMACOG
MVRPC
EDATA
NEFCO
NOACA
Local approvals
Certification Date
Projected date for EPA approval
Federal grant total to date
Plan was approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
Plan was approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
Plan was approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
Plan was approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
Plan certified*
Approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
Plan certified*
Approved by EPA
Federal grant total to date
*Cuyahoga River Basin certified 1/80
Approval anticipated by 6/2/80.
8/30/79-1/16/80
1/31/80-4/15/80
6/30/80
$3,623,905
3/14/79
$2,241,850
3/20/79
$1,234,500
8/9/79
$.1,9] 7, 270
3/8/79
$1,376,192
10/26/79
3/11/80
$992,996
10/26/7Q
3/11/80
$3,327,692
II. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Describe state activity related to standards revision, time-frame, and
regional strategy being pursued:
USEPA is acting to promulgate standards over the objects of
the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Public hearings
were conducted in September 1979. Comments from the hearings
have been reviewed in the Regional Office. Final Regional
'draft is completed as of May 1980~
2/70
-------
'Ill
z o
o o
< rr
CU 3
> fD
i 3
0< r-t-
O"
05 QJ
Q.
fD
H~ -3
3" n
ra >M
O
o
o
T
o
r1
H
O
PI
VJ
)
I 3
c/i
-3
6
03
Q)
cr
ro
o>
___ __
" j-i
i'ij
co in
^
f »
l '
*
O
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
o
- i' -.'-.
':'} ;'; r;
en
CO
Ca
1 l
tXJ
en
*
o
^
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
§
o
1 ' CO
O "J
en
2
ro
P^
PO'
i »
*
co
o
o
o
CTl
O
0
0
un
ro
on
^
n T-
o ?-
r: '_
0 ?
P!
CO
^'- < C
" o
-~ t~*
o
<; r
O -
t- IT
> r
H >
O
?J C
CO "
H *=
" *"
CO t
3 °
2 H
O «
r-f C1
ri
O ?-
H H
n o
K H
o
H CO
O P:
H PO
PI
H
0
S H
X M
P-J
o n
H 50
H
o
2. H
O S
H CO
~
W ri
o
CO
H
>
H
PJ
PI
O
4 H
) >
3 r1
73 ^*
n to
O 3
w o
: o <
: o PI
^ r-« "*
3 -^ ?3
1 l-l
" ^ S
2 S 3
1 ?*
H
" K Z
H C PI
> r< H
5 S |
a 0 S
1 TJ O
H
t-H
O
z.
^
^
Cu
c
^
en
S
o
f '
en
_
LJ
o:
ro
ra
n
in
M
en
T3
ri
M
S
in
«
pi
o
^
o
>
o
^
t
c
..
!T;
CJ:
2
O
>
M
33
o
53
O
§
H
a
Q
I
O
<
53
O
O
O
3-
o
o
3
a
-s
UD
CO
O
8 irr
-------
-h
m
> en
d -a
H PJ
O o
2
Z
O
O
o
r-
t-
z
a
> z
§ JS
I-? O
3 g
r=i R
O H
e-*-
rt-
O
-s
1
~n
r-i I CO 73
~n on o o
PO O 3C 73
1 1 1 1
O eo o en
o
a
c
en
o"
c-t-
O
ro
01
o
-h
^.
O
-j.
O
1
CT>
en o
1 §
-h c
ro 5
-5 J5
0
01 o
rt- <
0 -
_u
0
O 3s
O) O
co c-t-
O
CD 3
C 01
-S 1
a.
j
*
*
M
l-t*
0
rr
H-
O
i-n
O
g
en
rr
flj
rr
?
3
H-
ID
3
O
1
n
1
3
fT
O
n
ro
o
z
o
3
ro
ro
NON-MtltllCirAL
DISCHARGERS
CO
en
No Projec
By State
No Projec
By State
u>
o
-p>
en
r\3
PI O Z
-si ^ O
pi a <
<=>% 3
> o
- o
pi o z
*J ;= 0
og s *
g 3 -
en
en
01
en
s^
ro
^j
eo
MUNICIPAL
DISCHARGERS
tn
.£»
tions Given
tions Given
ro
<-o
ro
en
'- o -z
*1 ?o O
O n b <
?3 PI
gj3 -
S o o
'n 73 <2
Opi a
73 PI
=3 W
> en
ro
en
--j
en
s«
co
CD
co
MAJOR
SOURCES
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL
VIOLATING
FINAL
UNITS
VIOLATING
SCHEDULES
ACTUAL
FINAL
EFFLUENT
VIOLATORS
ACTUAL
SCHEDULE
VIOLATORS
FINAL
EFFLUENT
VIOLATIONS
SCHEDULE
VIOLATIONS
2 a > "t
o c: o pi
Z 50 1-4 C
>-} >-» l-l PJ
s z o ;o
o a £.
M t~
FEDERAL
ACTIONS
FY 80
2 <
§5"
O 1
PI O
» rr
ons) ** .
PERCENT
STATE
PI
"3
>
T)
M;
CO
s>
MMITMENTS
FY 80TO DATE
ACC011PLISH>ENTS **
STATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
A*
FEDERAL ACTIONS
'/. IN COMPLIANCE
(Total of all
NUMBER OF INSPECIIONSI
z
a
H
>
»
P!
z C^
O "
o
=r
o
-a
-s
OD
O
OT III
-------
o
3
fD
a>
n
fD
Q.
3
rt-
O
QJ
-5
ro
CO
_j.
O
3
QJ
QJ
3
01 III
3 73 >-i
o ro oo
CL 3 oo
_i. OJ C
-h - ro
-> 3 O.
ro ""*
O. 3 *-"*
tQ *T|
-TI ' *
< ~n *
-< ^
O CO
N * O
"^^
' to
O ' --J
-e» '
-J-H
one
n QJ o5
0 3
C rt-0
-S m
-s o
ro o H
0-3 0
?*
"< ^J
_,. 0 H
3- EL
o z
C T3 3
to. -5
3- O o
<0 o
OJ -S v
& 3
333
OJ o
o' ^
-S O>r)
-5 3
ro ->§
-^ri-g
-h -..JM
0 0 g
~S QJ 5
rt- -'.'T
" ='tT
Q-m
3S5
ro r+3
S-rj S
ro << [I
?-_,<
~7f9
oo'^
OO rt-
rt- "Z.
OJ 00 O
rt- C
ro o~ oo
3 -"
3- -"-tO.
OJ rt- 3
00 ft- -J.
ro -h
0 CL -i.
-a o
-a cr OJ
0 << 3
00 rt
ro o _
sffort. Mid-manag<
110 was determined
J toxicant monitor
- IU
3 rt- 3
in o ro
3
-S CT rt
ro ro
JO 00
C -" rt
-i. 3 -J.
-S QJ '
ro CL >
3 ro
ro -O CL
3 C O
rt- QJ ro
oo c-t- oo
fD
"O 3
-S 0
O rt
T3 <
o ro oo
00 -S C
ro << TS
CL -a
i O
or _i. -s
"< rt- rt-
rt
c: >3
oo ro QJ
m rt-
-o o -J.
3-^ > O
OJ 3
3 QJ
0 fD 1-5
-S -5 G
Q> QJ CO
3
-, 0
1 **
-O 3 i-tf
0 rtya
°? ="P1
Jf 00 i_4
_!. S
nr. -t,s
o o 22
3 -S H
^o rs*
-h pj
QJ -«. 2
-S 3 S
fC QJ M
' 173
3 5d
O T3 o
sSi|
cr oo c.
fD OJ 1?
-"«3 *
3 ro
«= ^
a
±^§
51s
2 2 rt
Q- fD p.
S ro
^ *"
^^ ^i >^
O rt-
ro
rl- 3-0
rt" OJ 3"
_i. 00 -J.
3 O
U3 CT
ro '
oo ro ro
c-t- 3 OQ
U J.
-h -S oo
-h ro '
cu QJ
O 0 rl-
3 3- -"
ro <
cr CLro
o
OJ O 3"
-s 3 ro
CL OJ
rt- -S
_j. 3- -j.
oo ro 3
tQ
O oo oo
-S rl-
-j. QJ O
rl- -h O
-" -h 3
O ct-
Oi >->.
' ro 3
< c
-" fD ro
3 i
OJ
O -h rl-
3" O
-J. -S QJ
O
-J. <
QJ 3 ro
3 -0 -S
Q- '<<
ro
3 3 oo
c ro
oo 3 O
rt- rl- 2
_j.
CT 3 T3
ro to QJ
o
~o rt- ro
C 3~
oo ro
3"
|T> *1"^ *^^
ro o ^
Q. -5 QJ
ro"<
rt-
-S CT
ro ro
OJ
S"S.
3 rt
ro
3 '
rl- ro
QJ
(/I
rt-
tl CO
> H
n >
M H
f G
M CO
H
1-4 O
n
"a
p] O
?a PI
2 f
M P3
H n
H-t 1-?
^ »~3
ya M
0 O
o z
*T3
.o'
> o
2 *J
*Tj
^ t~^
3 a
9> PI
t-t ?)
H >
» f
rt
H-
<
<0
\^s
i a o
fD QJ 3-
p -s ->
' OJ O
00 CT
4 _1. 3
QJ o ro
c-t 3 ro
_i. . Q.
O 00
3
-3 rt-
ro -s o
X 0
o -a o
ro o cr
nf/1 . -t-
W* CT
rt- ro OJ
ro CL ->
CL 3
legislative autho
language was submi
in Januarv 1980.
rt- -5
rl- -"
ro n-
CL<<
rt-
O
O
' -S
ro QJ
[O -^)
' c-t-
00
OJ OJ
rt- 3
C OO
-s c
ro QJ
UD
-a. fD
3
3 3
OJ CL
<< ro
-s
tQ~O
^J -S
to ro
. i
i
2 2
G C
Z 2
M 1
0
t-t
T)
>
r*
,
Q
OJ
-~j
OJ
OJ
o
ro
QJ -5
r> 3* m
c-t- 0
-a ro
o ro -j.
3 -S <
oo 3 ro
-j- CL
OJ rt-
-5 oo
ro
3" IND
-a QJ
fD < TJ
zs ro fo
a. -s
-3 3
3 ro -1
td < rt-
ro oo
3^ S
cr -1
co ro '
ro >
-a 3
ro cr
f j, ^T\
3 * I U
3 oo
-i. 00 T3
rt- C C
oo ro cr
CL i
§-' o
«^.
o m 3
3-3 o
-h rt
3- O -J
QJ -S O
< o ro
ro ro D-
ro ro '
X 3 3
a rt-
«i. ~<
-S QJ
ro *<
o .
~n
m
3= a
^ m
o ^;
>
3 i
S H
S 2
0 3=
-T-l (" .
^J 1
(^
^3
_p*
4^
OJ
Ul
to
o
-0 -J
ro
-s o
3 -h
_j.
CT tO
oo
ro
s. x
-i.X3
' -S
ro
cr CL
ro
T3
-> ro
oo 3
oo 3
c: -"
fD c-t
CL 00
S £
3- ro
ro -s
3 ro
oo -a
rt c:
a; cr
rt
ro -"
- o
00
3
O O
ro rt
rt O
-i. ro
-h O_
1. .
o
OJ
rt- 1
-" 3"
o ro
3 00
ro
QJ
^
t
ro
2
^\ G
n z
O M
H n
s: M
- >TJ
ca >
v^ f
m^
On
cr>
it.
^
,
-Cs
Ji>
-
r\3
o
6 expired permits
required AST/AWT
-s
ro QJ
< -s
-" ro
ro
s c
CL
ro
ro -5
-a ro
ro 3
i?
-" -S
rt 0
oo ro
s ro
-" 3
' rt
a>
cr o
ro rt
_i. o
00 3
oo
c
ro
Q- *>
^ 2
w E
2 O
3"
CA
.4 fyj 2 *^
o o > o
PI a c-i H
Z » O >
H n 73 r1
M M
T) CO
ht
P3
a
T3 PI M Z
PI ^ co G
g T! co 2
2 M G 05
l-l O P3 PJ
H H 0 JO
CO t-t
< >
P3 2
o
P3 Z TJ Z
=1 O P3 G
TI H P3 2
PI 2 »
O M P!
H H JO
M CO
< O
p] f}
70 CO B> Z
PI M C
-0 Z PI 2
o n *! a
ja PI ^ pi
H PI ja
t-1 n
> H M
CO M CO
H < CO
PI G
O
COMMENTS ON NON-I
ISSUANCES
"
6Z./Z
Z PJ *3
tJ Z M
o "=1 a
P3 O 2
CO ?8 l-l
O H
"d PI
PJ 2 W
co , rs
?i;
o
CO
1-1
CO
CO
IT
03
rt
fS
O
1C
(-H
[O
'2
O
a
CO
o
-------
Organics Regulations State Region-wide
Division Water
Branch Water Supply
Date May 7, 1980
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form;
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the'issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update rn this issue.
Summary of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic organic
contamination of industrial origin. Sixty-two indicator organic materials were named
as being possibly associated with such contamination, and granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment was proposed as the best available means of removing these contaminants
from drinking water. Design criteria were designated for the GAC treatment. A simul-
taneous proposal was made to limit trihalomethane contamination to 10 ppb in drinking
water. Such contamination develops as a result of reactions between the treatment
chemical, chlorine, and naturally present organics.
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No laboratories
have been certified for the necessary organic analyses. Laboratory methods have
not been established beyond the research laboratory to give the sensitivity impor-
tant to drinking water analyses. The trihalomethane (TTHM) regulation appears to
be of small importance to Region V, in that no large systems to which the proposal
was limited have been shown to have high TTHM levels present.
Perception on Issues:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be familiar with the
tests required and should be confident in the results of such tests. Lacking standard-
ized methods and certified laboratories, the only dependable source for such information
would appear to be highly specialized laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Water Supply Branch has determined to carry out a
study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems most likely to be affected by
industrial contamination.
Involved Characters:
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Update:
«0 now lags 2 months on preparation of certification guidelines for trihalomethane
alysis. This is now becoming a; critical issue with Ohio EPA especially concerned
about our credibility and their cooperative stance. The treatment effects specialist
has begun gathering data for early TTHM investigative work in Indiana and Ohio.
-------
State OTTTD
Water Quality Mat.
Date MaY 1980
USE?A - REGION V - SPECIAL I5SUZS
Irstructions for Comnietion or this Fora:
?'iease~use the following format to su^arite special problems requiring attention:
Include a description sunaarising the ISSUE, a section providing che BACZGROU^TD
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the ZSVCLVID
CAST C?' CnAIlACTZRS-r-ail publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE - Ohio EPA has adopted a minimum dissolved oxygen (D.O.) standard of 5 mg/1
for 16 hours of any 24 hour period, and 4 mg/1 for the other 8 hours. Region V does
not believe that a minimum of less than 5 mg/1 at any time is supportable.
BACKGROUND - Ohio EPA adopted the 5/4 mg/1 D.O. standard in January 1978, and this
was subsequently disapproved on May 17, 1978, by the Regional Administrator. Pfe
were not convinced that Ohio EPA's rationale (low stream reaeration coefficient,
diurnal fluctuations, especially in Northeast Ohio) justified deviating from the
National "red book" recommendation of 5 mg/1 for warmwater habitat. Subsequently,
the Director of the Ohio EPA agreed to change the minimum D. 0. standard to 5 mg/1
concurrent with EPA promulgation action. Headquarters published the proposed rules
on July 6, 1979.
Public hearings on the proposed Federal water quality standards were held on
September 17, 19, and 21, in Akron, Columbus, and Dayton, Ohio, respectively. The
hearing announcement was published in the Federal Register, and appeared in
newspapers on August 16, 1979.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
Ohio EPA
Region V
EPA Headquarters
^Ohio municipalities and industries affected by standards
UPDATE
The three public hearings were held in Ohio and the hearing record was officially
closed on October 19, 1979. The Regional Office is presently reviewing the comments
in the hearing record and is in the process of preparing a final position. Ohio's
Attorney General filed a complaint against the USEPA concerning Ohio's water quality
standards on September 7, 1979. The OEPA took depositions from Kent Fuller and
Bill Benjey in February. Regional Counsel also took depositions from Ernest Rotering
and Ed Duffield of OEPA. The Court has continued discovery in Ohio's suit into
August 1980. EPA may add a Modified Warmwater Habitat use classification to allow
for instances when it can be shown that 5 mg/1 dissolved oxygen is not attainable.
(5/13/80
-------
OHIO
WATER
Water Quality Mat.
-~~
Da^ May 1980
L'SEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUZS
I-str-'.ctions for Cctrnletion of this 7cm:
Please use the following format to su^ariza special problems requiring attention:
Include a description susoarizing the ISSUE, a section providing che^AC^ROLND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on tne iNVCL'.-D
C\3" C?'CEARACTE3.S.--all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As naw^
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE - OHIO EPA and Region V were developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
which will provide day-by-day guidance on water quality standards, downgradings
and the application of waste load allocations.
BACKGROUND - OHIO EPA and Region V have long recognized the need for mutually
understood guidance on the above topics, which are addressed only generally in
EPA regulations and the Clean Water Act. Ohio EPA and Region V had resolved most
wording differences and had EPA Headquarters concurrence. On July 20, 1979,
Director McAvoy indicated that the MOU was not acceptable without economic
methodology, which is not adequate for USEPA.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
Ohio EPA
Region V, Water Division
EPA Headquarters
UPDATE
There has been no progress to develop the MOU which is now moot. However,
the subject matter of the MOU is being addressed by other means, such as national
guidance. Water quality standards are in the process of being promulgated for
Ohio. A Region V economic methodology for downgrading was developed. For other
downgrading justifications, Region V has used portions of the draft MOU as a basis
for Regional downgrading policy. Headquarters now has a draft for national guidance.
The USEPA policy on AST/AWT has established the framework for'the production of
additional waste load allocations. Current WLA work with OEPA centers on the Great
Miami River in order to maximize the obligation of Construction Grant funds to Ohio.
A joint venture is envisioned involving OEPA, USEPA Region V, Eastern District Office,
USEPA Headquarters' consultants, and the U.S. Geological Survey. Tne OEPA has
prepared a work plan for the Great Miami. The work plan is now undergoing final
adjustments and a data review was performed by Headquarter's consultants (GKY).
Future work will be guided by the SEA process, rather than an MOU. This is the
last update on this issue. (5/13/80)
-------
Scats r'HIO
Division
Branch Water Quality Mgt.
Date MaY 1980
U3ZPA - RIGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
""sr-"tors for Coi^lecion of this "era:
Pleased che following for^ac to su^riza special problems requiring "tentjon:
--cl"de a description 5u=arising Che ISSUE, a section providing che pAC^GSOL.ID
en che problea, issue or perceptions on che issue, and a section on tr.e iNV !. =.P
CAST G~' CHARACTERS--all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As nsw^
infor=acioti develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE - The poor performance of the Northeast Ohio Four County Development and
Planning Organization (NEFCO) in water quality management planning has made
further direct funding undesireable.
BACKGROUND - NEFCO's water quality management planning over the past four years
has resulted in a disorganized, incomplete and not implementable plan. NEFCO
does have good support from local governments. The original plan addressed
water quality abatement actions only in the most general ways, except for status
quo for point source discharges. However, in the last year, NEFCO has made
substantial progress in the remedying plan deficiencies, with local funds.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
NEFCO - Desires additional direct funding
NSFCO area local governments - Support NEFCO's plan and management
structure
Ohio EPA - Wishes to fund NEFCO directly from EPA to avoid the burden of
oversight and the byzantine polities of the Cleveland-Akron area.
NDACA - Currently at odds with NEFCO over two counties (Summit and Portage)
now in NOACA1s area
Region V, Water Division
UPDATE
"x.
NEFCO and OEPA have developed contracts for further work.t OEPA is responsible
to Region V and receives water quality management grant funds for the NEFCO
area. The first contract is acceptable and was through Region V cost-price
review. The necessary amendment to OEPA's grant has been processed and Region
V has provided assistance to the OEPA through section 106 funds to coordinate
with NEFCO. NEFCO has drafted proposed management structure by-laws and implementa-
tion statement format, which are under review. In addition, OEPA conducted a
public hearing in October for redesignation of the upper Cuyahoga Basin from NOACA
to NEFCO. The Governor has recommended redesignation, which was approved by
the Regional Administrator on May 2, 1980. NEFCO has-prepared a considerable
amount of remedial work, which has been reviewed. The work represents
substantial improvement. This is the last update on this issue (5/13/80)
-------
State Oh TO
Division Air & Hazardous Mat'Is
Branch Air Programs
Mav 8..JQ8Q. _.
USZPA - SZGI::: v - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Casslstlon of this Fora:
CAST 0?' CHASACTZRSTall publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions charge, please indicate
this in the aonthly update on this issue.
Akron SO? Regulations
ISSUE - The sulfur dioxide regulations for Summit County were promulgated
in the Federal Register on December 5, 1979 (44 FR 69928).
The S02 regulation for the PPG plant was held until ,the
Pacific Environmental Services (PES) completed a comparison.study
of the Ohio S02 SIP revision submittal. The study compared
USEPA's critical receptors with OEPA's emission inventory to
determine if violations exist in Barbe^ton, Ohio.
INVOLVED CHARACTERS - Akron Industry
Congressman Pease; Congressman Seiberling
Douglas Costle
1. PES has completed its review of Summit County. The OEPA's control
strategy will not protect the ambient standards, Disapproval of the
OEPA 502 regs for Summit County was proposed February 25, 1980.
Public comment period ends May 26, 1980.
2. Firestone has submitted a formal request for revision of the
December 5, 1979 regulations. This request is acceptable and
a NPR has been prepared in draft.
3. A NFR for the PPG plant in Summit County is being prepared.
Expected to be published in the Federal Register June 16, 1980.
-------
Orqanics Regulations
State Region-Wide
n. . . Water
Division
Branch Water Supply
Date April 7, 1980
UJ5EPA - REGIO_NJV - S^KIAL_ISSUES
I n s t r u c t i o ns^qr_Com^lg_timi_of_thi s_JForm:
Please usTThsT following format" to" summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the ^NVOLV>D
CAST OF CEARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
inf o rma t i on~d ev elops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Surrmary_ of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic organic
contamination of industrial origin. Sixty-two indicator organic materials were named
as being possibly associated with such contamination, and granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment was proposed as the best available means of removing these contaminants
from drinking water. Design criteria were designated for the GAC treatment. A simul-
taneous proposal was made to limit trihalomethane contamination to 10 ppb in drinking
water. Such contamination develops as a result of reactions between the treatment
chemical, chlorine, and naturally present organics.
Background:
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No laboratories
have been certified for the necessary organic analyses. Laboratory methods have
not been established beyond the research laboratory to give the sensitivity impor-
tant to drinking water analyses. The trihalomethane (TTHM) regulation appears to
be of small importance to Region V, in that no large systems to which the proposal
was limited have been shown to have high TT1IM levels present.
Perception on Issues:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be familiar with the
tests required and should be confident in the results of such tests. Lacking standard-
ized methods and certified laboratories, the only dependable source for such informatior
would appear to be highly specialized laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Hater Supply Branch has determined to carry out a
study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems most likely to be affected by
industrial contamination.
In vol ved Characters :
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Uodajte
QAO failed to prepare certification guidelines for the trihalomethane analysis. This
was to be done to fill a gap left by EMSL. Ohio is insisting on early certification,
out we can not deliver at this time. A treatment effects expert was added to the staff
who will be concentrating on gathering and following-up on compliance data for trihalo-
rechanes.
-------
State Ohio TV i
Division Air & HfiZordcus_.Mt_!_jj
Branch Air Proqrans
Date
USEPA - "-ZC-IO'.-! V - SPECIAL ISSUHS
Instruc*"lons for jZorrgletior. qi ^rA^J-JrL7-^
on Che problsn, issue or per:.Dp'c.i;j- s on tha issue, and - section on ;h-:. ^li^JL-,:^.
CiVST 0T Crl~3_A.CTZ".3-: all publics concerned or involved with t:ie~ i£3'oo. -^ n<-.w
inforEati oiTZevalop s , other probU-ns arise, or perceptions change., please indicaf
this in tha acnthly upcara on this issua.
Akron SO? Regulations
ISSUE - The sulfur dioxide regulations for Surrenit County were promulgated
in the Federal Register on December 5, 1979 (44 FR 69928).
The S02 regulation for the PPG plant was hold until ,th? -
Pacific Environmental Services (PES) completed a comparison .study
of trie Ohio SO/ SIP revision subnitt:?.!. The study co~narpc
USEPA' s critical recsptor-; \'ith OEPA's emission 'in venter;, to
determine if yio1 aliens exlM in carb-> -:o;i. Chio.
Cr-L-^.-CTERS - Akron Industry
_ . - Congressman Pease; Congressman Seiberling
Douglas Costle -
1. PES has completed its review of Summit County. The GEPA's control
strategy will not protect the ambient standards. Disapproval of the
OEPA $02 regs for Summit County was proposed February 25, i980.
Requlatigns to control SO? at the PPGS plant in Summit County will be
- forthcoming shortly.'
2. Firestone has submitted a formal request for revision of the
December 5, 1979 regulations. This request is acceptable end
a technical support document is in final typing. NPR will be
forthcoming.
MAR 1980
-------
\
OH IV 2
State: Ohio
Division: Water
Branch: Construction
Management &
Planning
Date: July 5, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
ISSUE - Obligation Outlook for Ohio for FY 79
BACKGROUND - The status of obligations is shown in the tabulation below:
Commitment Target Actual
3rd Quarter $107,000,000 $62,800,000
4th Quarter $187,000,000 *
* Fourth quarter obligations are projected to be $105,000,000 which would
result in a total obligation of 3167,800,000 for FY 79. This is
$19,200,000 short of the commitment target established in March 1979.
The underlying reason for not meeting the commitment target is that Step 1
and Step 2 grants are not being completed and therefore, do not result in
Step 3 grants necessary to meet commitments. The reasons for the shortage
of projects are the lack of resources at OEPA, the emphasis on quality
projects, and the Clean Water Act changes. The OEPA resource problem is
the one that is most critical at this point.
RESOLUTION - We have established fast track lists for nine Step 2,
three Step 2+3 and 19 Step 3 projects that comprise the projected
$105,000,000. The fast track list indicates some problems with the pro-
jected grants and that perhaps only 80% of the projected obligations or
approximately $85,000,000 will be made. The fast track list is showing us
where to best place our resources and also, by indicating problems at this
time, may help us to resolve the problems on some of the questionable
projects.
It should also be noted that in order to use all funds alloted to Ohio for
FY 78, $248,000,000 would have to be obligated. Depending on 4th quarter
obligations, the loss of allotted funds may be from $80,000,000 to
$100,000,000. The only way that the State of Ohio can avoid losing funds
every year is get additional resources for the OEPA. This could be accom-
plished through 205(g) but OEPA needs to pursue resolving the Heery Report
issues.
CAST of CHARACTERS - USEPA and OEPA Construction Grants Staffs
-------
OH IV 3
State Ohio
Division Water
\
Branch Facilities Planning
Date July 5, 1979
USEPA-REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form.
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attentiont
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERSall public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
This is written to delete the previous special issues (page IV OH 3) regarding the
Columbus, Ohio EIS situation and the Heery Report. The EIS has been issued and the
City fully understands our position. Ohio Facilities Planning Section staff will be
meeting with the City to discuss implementation of the EIS. With respect to the
Heery Report, the OEPA must decide on what course of action they will pursue to
solve the problems identified in the report. This relates to the loss of funds
issue that is being submitted at this time.
JUL
-------
Continued from page 1
State
Ohio
IV OH
Division Water
Branch Facilities Planning
Date
March 9, 1979
USEPA - REGION 7 - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS--all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Continued
McAvoy suggested a meeting with the RA on March 19 and invited the City to attend.
The Ohio FPS has had a continuous dialogue with City of Columbus officials on
these issues and has reached verbal agreements but, recently there seems to be a
change of feelings and they are no longer as reasonable as before. Without coop-
eration from the OEPA (Ernie Rotering) and Columbus (Bob Parkinson) this issue
will end up in a long battle that will delay needed facilities. The Water Division
will prepare a more detailed briefing memo prior to the meeting.
2. ISSUE
The 205 management study has been completed by Heery and Associates and there will
probably be a need to discuss the importance and the impact of this study with
McAvoy. A more detailed briefing will be prepared on the recommendation of this
study which includes some major structure changes within OEPA.
2/7-
-------
OH IV 5
State Ohio
Division Enforcement
Branch _ Permit _
Date 5-7-79 _
USEPA-REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form.
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:.
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS all public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
Issue - 1. States are having moderate to severe resource problems in establishing
their NPDES pretreatment programs. 2. The Region has a very tight schedule in the
State pretreatiTient program delegation process.
Background - EPA's pretreatment regulations (June 1978) require all NPDES States to
establish ana implement a pretreatment program. Where State legal authority exists,
they were to apply to operate the pretreatment program by March 27, 1979. If author-
ity is not in place, the State has up to March 1980 to apply. While preliminary steps
could be taken, the magnitude of the program for larger States is the major issue.
Even a minimum program not fully addressing the full requirements will require 8 (MM)
to 25 (OH-!L.J~staff by the end of FY '80. No new 106 or other funds are likely to be
available. Where States have 205 authority, some 106 funds have been made available
but largely lost through inflation, v.'.iile a number of POTWs presently have pretreat-
ment programs in various stages, pretreatment is looked at as another new £e_djeraj
program with no funds to implement. Therefore, to operate a pretreatment program,
other existing programs will have to be additionally cut. Funding is generally
available for FY '79, but FY '80-'81 funding will be a major issue needing resolution
in the 106 and 205 process. Failure to operate the pretreatment program are grounds
for withdrawal _ of liPDLS authority, and EPA will then have to operate both the NPDES
and the pretreatment programs. In addition, no Step II (July ''80) or Step III
(December '80) grants can be given to POT'/.'s needing pretreatment programs unless
pretreat;nent implementation schedules are being met by those dates. Evan with very
limited resources, Region V States have, in general, done an outstanding job of layina
out and starting to gear up and ;nove the program. However, full implementation of
even^a minimum pretreatment program will severely tax the States' staffing level. We
are faced with this major issue now because of the March 27, 1979, regulatory report! IK
requirements of committing future resources by the States.
The pretreatment regulations allow EPA 90-days to rule on a State's application, which
includes publication in the federa]_Re£i_ster and some 212-800 newspapers, along with
a 45-day public comment period. Meeting the time requirement, particularly obtaining
timely Headquarters concurrence, will require special handling and close cooperation"
Proposed changes in the regulations will reduce the public comment period to 30 da vs.
Recent Headquarters memorandum restricts Regions to 65 days total to process adequa^
submittals.
-LlI^l^4_c_^^oj^Cj]ia£a_^e_r^ - Regional responsibility for pretreatrnant is in the
Enforcement Division followed by the Water Division and Regional Counsel. Similar
staff are involved in the States. In addition, some 700-800 PGTrfs will be required
to establish programs, and 20,000 to 60,000 industries will be effected.
MAY
-------
Ohio IV-
Division Air & Hazardous Mater
Branch Pesticide
Date 4/4/79
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following format to summarize.special problems requiring attentic
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the IlsVOLVZ'
CAST OF CHARACTERS^--all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indie,
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Issue:
Background:
Cast of
Characters:
Pesticide Enforcement Agreement outputs
The 1978 FIFRA Amendments gave the states enforcement primacy (Sec.
as of this date, three states ((Michigan, Minnesota and Indiana with
Enforcement Agreement/Grants) have automatic use primacy.
Illinois and Wisconsin have also been granted primacy pursuant to a
effective Sec. 4 applicator certification plan. Ohio has indicated
that state cooperation with the Administrator's Emergency Suspensic
Order of 2/28/79 (2,4,5-T and Si!vex) would be extremely limited.
Consequently, the Agency is presently considering denying use prims
to Ohio because of this reluctance to cooperate. This matter must
be resolved as soon as possible.
Illinois - Dwight Dunbar, Chief, Bureau of Plant & Apiary Protectic
Illinois Dept. of Agriculture
Indiana - 1. 0. Nelson, Pesticide Administrator, Office of
Indiana State Chemist
Michigan - Dean Lovitt, Chief, Plant Industry Division, Michigan
Department of Agriculture
Minnesota - Tom McConnell, Acting Director, Agronomy Services,
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Ohio - . Oren Spilker, Specialist in Charge, Pesticide Regulatio
Ohio Department of Agriculture
Wisconsin- William Simmons, Chief, Bureau of Special Services,
Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
-------
STATE OHIO IV 7
DIVISION Water
' ' BRANCH Water Quality Mat.
DATE M^rch 1980
USEPA - REGION, V_ - SPECIAL ISSUES
. Instruction for Completion of this form:
Please use the following formal to summarize special problems requiring
" attention: Include a description summarizing the I_SSU£, a section providing
the BACKGROUND on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a
section on the INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS. - all public concerned or
involved with the issue. As new information develops, other problems
arise, or perceptions change, please indicate this in the monthly update
on this issue.
ISSUE - Ohio EPA has adopted a minimum dissolved oxygen (0.0.) standard of 5 mg/1
for 16 hours of any 24 hour period, and 4 mg/1 for the other 8 hours. Region V does
not believe that a minimum of less than 5 mg/1 at any time is supportable.
BACKGROUND - Ohio SPA adopted the 5/4 mg/1 D.O. standard in January 1978, and this
.was subsequently disapproved on Hay 17, 1978,. by the Regional Administrator. We
were not convinced that Ohio SPA's rationale (low stream reaeration coefficient,
diurnal fluctuations, especially in Northeast Ohio) justified deviating from the
National "red book" recommendation of 5 mg/1 for warmwater habitat. Subsequently,
the Director of the Ohio-EPA agreed to. change the minimum D. 0. standard to 5 mg/i
concurrent with EPA promulgation action.' Headquarters .published the prooosed rules
on-July 6, 1979. .
Public hearings on the proposed Federal water quality standards were held on
September 17, 19, and 21, in Akron, Columbus, and Dayton, Ohio, respectively. The
hearing announcement was published in the f^era\_Regis_ter, and appeared in
newspapers'on August 16, 1979.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
Ohio EPA '
Region V
SPA Headquarters
Ohio municipalities and industries affected by standards.
UPDATE
The three public hearings were held in Ohio and the hearing record was officially
closed on October 19, 1979. The Regional Office is presently reviewing the comments
in the hearing record and is in the process of preparing a final oosition. Ohio's
Attorney General filed a complaint against the USEPA concerning Ohio's water quality
standards on September 7, 1979. The OSPA took depositions from Kent Fuller and
Bill- 3enjey in February. Regional Counsel also took depositions from
Ernest Rotering and Ed Duffield of OEPA.' The Court has continued discovery in'Ohio1
suit into August 1980. (3/6/80)
1980
-------
'APR7L 19SO
on this issue.
.ISSUE ~ OHIO EPA and Region V are developing a Memorandum of Understand lay (ML*
which- will provide day-by-day guidance on water quality standards, dOvvngradings
vnd the application of waste load allocations,
5ACKGIprjND '-- OHIO SPA and Region V have long recognized the need for mutually
understood guidance on the above topics, which -are addressed only generally in
EPA regulations and the Clean Water Act. Ohio EPA and Region V had resolved frost
wording -differences, We have EPA Heaiciuar ters concurrence.
Headquarter's review of the Ohio 1PA economic methodology has been completed,
and the methodology judged insufficient. Consequently, the methodology was removed
fron the MOU, and the MOD was signed by the Regional Administrator on July 4, 1379,
and transmitted to Ohio EPA for Director McAvoy's signature. Director McAvoy has
since indicated verbally and in his letter of July 20, 1979, that the OEPA does not
believe that the MOrJ is viable without the OEPA "working oaoers" appended to it. "?:
working pacers include the aforementioned economic methodology, downgrading discus-
sions, and drafts of previous documents which were rewritten or deleted for clarity,
The bone of contention remains the economic methodology, however. The OS PA
essentially wishes to retreat to the MOU as ic stood last December. This action
disrupted the negotiation process, and has harmed the construction grants prog. ,
because the MOU included provisions for AST, AWT, waste load allocations, and
downg rad ing orov is ions.
UPDATE
gional
guidance. Water quality standards are in the process of being promulgated for
Ohio. A Region V economic methodology for downgrading was developed. For other
down-grading justifications, Region V has used 'portions of the draft MOU as a basis
for Regional downgrading policy. " The USE9A policy on AST/AWT has established the -
framework for the oroduction of additional waste load allocations. Current
-------
WLA work with OSP& centers on the Great Miami River in order to maximize the
obligation of Construction Grant funds to Ohio. A joint venture is envisioned
involving 05P&, USEPA Region V, Eastern District Office, USEPA Headquarters'
consultants, and the U.S. Geological Survey. The OSPA has prepared a work plan
for the Great Miami. The work plan is now undergoing final adjustments and
a data review is being performed by Headquarter's consultants (GKY). (4/9/30)
-------
STATE OHI° IV 9,
DIVISION WATER
' BRANCH Water Quality Mgt.
-: March 1980
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
. Instruction fo_r_ Completion of this form:
Please use the following format to summarize specidl problems requiring
attention: Include a description suirmarizing the ISSUE, a section providing
the BACKGROUND on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a
section on the INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS - all public concerned or
involved with the issue. As new information develops, other problems
arise, or perceptions change, please indicate this in the monthly uDdate
on this issue.
ISSUE - The poor performance of the Northeast Ohio Four County Development and
Planning Organization (NEFCO) in water quality management planning has made
further direct funding undesireable. .
BACKGROUND - NEFCO 's water quality management planning over the past four years
has resulted in a disorganized, 'incomplete and not implement able plan. NEFCO
does have good support from local governments. The original plan' addressed
water quality abatement actions only in the most general ways", except for status
quo for point source discharges. However, in the last year, NEFCO has made '
substantial progress in remedying plan deficiencies, with local funds.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
NEFCO - Desires additional direct funding
NEFCO area local governments - Support NEFCO 's plan and management
structure
Ohio EPA - Wishes to fund NEFCO directly from SPA to avoid the burden of
oversight and the byzantine polities of the Cleveland-Akron area.
JOACA - Currently at odds with NEFCO over two counties (Summit and Portage)
now in NOACA's area.
Region V, Water Division
UPDATE
NEFCO and OEPA have developed contracts for further work'. OSPA is responsible
to Region V and receives water quality management grant funds for the NEFCO
area. The first contract is acceptable and has been through Region V cost-price
review. The necessary amendment to OEPA's grant has been processed and- Region
V has provided' assistance to the 'OEPA through section 106 funds to coordinate
with NEFCO. NEFCO has drafted proposed management structure by-laws and implementa-
tion _ statement format, which are under review, 'in addition, OEPA conducted" a"
public hearing in October for redes ignat ion of the upper Cuyahoga 3asin from NOACA
to NEFCO. The Governor has recommended redes ignat ion, and the action is under revi,
by Region -V. NEFCO has prepared a considerable- amount of remedial work, which- -has
been reviewed. The work represents substantial 'improvement . (3/6/30)
WAR
-------
State
Division Water
IV 10
Ohio
Branch Water
Date August 6, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Summary of Issue.-
Ohio has been awarded a Underground Injection Control (UIC) grant for
FY 79 and has expressed the intent to apply in September for the FY 80
grant.
Background:
ODNR has moved aggressively to take the lead for the UIC program and
has recently been designated as the lead agency. OEPA was the previous
designate. Work on the FY 79 and 80 grants will center around aquifer
mapping and development of a primacy level program.
Perception of Issue:
We fully anticipate that ODNR will continue to move toward primacy, but
that coordination with OEPA will have to improve in the future.
Involved Characters:
ODNR, OEPA, Region V Water Supply Branch. Key Regional contact
Richard Bartelt (312) 353-2151.
AUQ
-------
State Qhio
Water Division
Division
Branch Water Supply Branch
Date April 3, 1979
USE?A - 5ZGION V - SPECIAL ISSUZS
Instructions for Completion of this Fern:
Please use the following format to suzsniarize special problems requiring attentii
Include a description sucnarizing the ISSUE, a. section providing the 3ACI
-------
State Ohio. -. IV l
Division Water Divison..... __
Water Supply Bran
Branch
Date April 3, 1979
USE?A - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion, of this Form:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attantic
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE,'a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the I.rvOLVEI
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indie:
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Summary of Issue:
EPA has spent considerable resources in developing the Model State
Information System for use by the Regions and the States in handling
public water system data. As with most new data systems, the MSIS is
beset by intsrpretational and programming errors and anamolies which
make it difficult to use at present. Region V's Water Supply Branch is
striving to implement MSIS for use on Indiana water system data.
Background:
MSIS inventory has long been considered usaable. Recent outputs,
however, indicate that an edit is necessary. This edit will be initi-
ated state by state, as soon as the Federal Reporting Data System input
(which ties directly to MSIS) is completed. MSIS compliance programs
have not been operated successfully in Region V.
Perception on Issue:
Headquarters has accepted contractor product which has many programming
errors in definition and which is often inefficient and difficult to
use. Correction of this programming has been unnecessarily prolonged by
marriage to the contractor product.
Involved Characters:
Headquarters, Other Regions, Region V, and the States.
Update:
All Indiana data for the first quarter of FY 79 has been edited and
corrected. January and February data are now being coded, edited, and
corrected. A portion of Wisconsin's "front-end" entry procedures were'
found to have potential in Region V's use of MSIS. The Headquarters'
"correction package" for MSIS operations still has bugs being worked
out. Front-end edits to the compliance program for FRDS have proven
unnecessarily bulky and time-consuming. Efforts to make FRDS and MSIS
compliance useable are continuing.
-------
State OHIO OH IV U
Division Water
Erinch Water Quality Mgt.
January 1980
Instructions far Cs pletion o
Please use the folleving format co surr.arize special problems requiring attention
Include a description 3 ;rrr..?. rising the 15 5'JZ , 3. sacticr. prcvidir.g the BAC^GRCUITT'
en the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and 3. section on the I}~'OLVZD
CAST OF CHAPJ--CT"?.S--all publics concerned or involved wi;h the issue. As nev
information develops, ether problems arisa. or perceptions change, please indicat;
this in the zonthlv update on this issua.
- Additional funding for the Eastgate Development and Transportation
Agency (EDATA). Executive Director William Fergus claims that there has
been unnecessary delay in our grant award.
UPDATE
issue resolved, grant offered June 29, 1979, and accepted September 18, 1979
This is the last update on this issue. (1/10/80)
J.
-------
State Ohio IV 15
Division Air & Hazardous Mat' Is
Branch Air Programs
y 4,
USE? A - RZGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following foraat to sunaariza special problaas requiring attention:
Include a description sussarizing the ISSUS, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on tha p rob lea, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a. section en the DEVOLVED
CAST OF* CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with tha issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Butler County (Ohio) S02 Regulations
ISSUE - Region V needs to repropose the S02 regulations in Butler County due to
erroneous data submitted to EPA through the section 114 mechanism. A
number of sub-issues are also involved:
- In setting emission limits for a State, can EPA reserve the PSD
increment, for the State's administration of the PSD program.? . -
- In developing emissions limits based on a modeling analysis, are
receptors located on plant property considered in the definition of
ambient air?
Several companies have joined with the Middletown Chamber- of Commerce
in requesting Environmental Research, Inc. (ERT) to conduct an ambient
sulfur -dioxide monitoring study in Butler County, Ohio. On December 13, -.,
]979y EBT-.submitted, a -revised, draft monitoring plan.. This plan was approved
'with' conditions'. Notification was sent on January 25, 1980. . -'"
A PSD permit "was .issued to Miller Brewing, Butler County, on ...
X September 13, 1979. ' -'
Note, the Ohio EPA plan for Butler County contains. only a few minor deficiency
If Ohio EPA can resolve these points, then Region V will approve this portion
of the Ohio EPA Plan.:
FEB
-------
IV If,
State Ohio
Division A&HMD
Branch Pesticides
Date June 6,1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE: Probable denial of pesticide use enforcement primacy
for the State of Ohio.
BACKGROUND: The Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) indicated in February that
it would provide only limited support for the Agency's 2,4,5-T and
Silvex Emergency Suspension Orders. Consequently, EPA Headquarters
determined that this posture warrants denial of enforcement primacy.
The Region V Office formally disagreed with this determination.
As of June 1, 1979, the Administrator is reviewing a letter to
, the ODA denying enforcement primacy. He is expected to concur.
A cover memo stating the Regional position is also under review.
A decision to deny enforcement primacy could have significant
impact on all pesticide program interactions between EPA and ODA.
Furthermore, such a decision could impact our projected resource
needs for FY 1980.
INVOLVED CAST
OF CHARACTERS: EPA Headquarters
EPA Region V
Ohio Dept. of Agriculture.
JUN
-------
USEPA. - SCION V'- SPECIAL Z.SSUZ3
ts on this issue.
,.., '^^SStiE :-v3dbie pcib^':p^rJPotiilancebf the aortheaat Ohio Pour County Development and
' ' >./^'.'3^inihQ.Otgar,i3ati0n'''{yBFCO} ,in water 'quality managexent plaroiing has aade
,';-;^tit1±teE ^itect funding imdesir ©able, - '
sage; in^sovintability,.or lestflts'JLs needed.'
I;*&!&surd&fi-'^t;^: 1:,'"' ':-'.',..',.
pgg|,f$ii;f 'v ;.:
aiiflSMi%feKiiia> i|:i&4iwC'-Jrfer«lV«U. 'tllSrt-(:Krt "t>j /»««5«^JltK». t/iia'i *'''
m^^/^m^mm^^^^j^m^ -; -.
::;;,;,
^iferaaaa|pr^ ^^^^ayet^^;^;^, ;^ y,
-------
OHIO _ OH IV 18
.Water...
Water Quality JMgt
December 1979
ISSUE - Additional funding for the Eastgate Development and Transportation
Agency (EDATA). Executive Director William Fergus claims that there has
been unnecessary delay in our grant award.
BACKGROUND - The funding plan for FY 1978 Water Quality Management grant
funds calls for the award of $99,630 to EDATA. Delay has been caused due
to conflict between OEPA and EDATA. We have withheld the grant in
support of OEPA and their implementation of a joint supplemental agreement
(JSA) with EDATA. We do not want to make the award over the State's
objection unless absolutly necessary. Further, the JSA is incorporated
as conditions in Region V's approval of EDATA1s plan. EDATA1s grant is
now being processed.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTER
Eastgate Transportation and Development Agency (EDATA), William Fergus,
Executive Director
OEPA, Carl Wilhelm, Planning Coordinator
USEPA, Water Division
UPDATE
The differences between EDATA and the OEPA were minor and readily resolved.
EDATA accepted a new grant received on June 26, 1979. However, EDATA did
protest to Region V and Headquarters concerning their desire to utilize
local funds spent in the past (above and beyond what was spent to match
water quality management planning grants) against future Federal monies.
We are prohibited from allowing any local matching funds except those
directly applied to current work. EDATA1s approach to Headquarters did
not result in any changes in USEPA1s position. EDATA is currently
projected to receive a grant offer for $82,050 in Federal dollars under
FY 1979 208 funding. EDATA accepted USEPA1s FY 1979 grant offer of
$82,050 on 9/18/79. (12/4/79)
-------
IV 19
State Ohio
Division Water
Branch Facilities Planning
Date June 5, 1979
USEPA-REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form.
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:.
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERSall public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE
Resolution of outstanding issues and completion of Columbus EIS.
BACKGROUND
The EIS has been completed and is presently being printed. All outstanding
issues, particularly those previously highlighted (intercepting sewers, pre-
treatment and plant design criteria) have been addressed to the satisfaction
of the Agency.
Upon acceptance by the City of Columbus, the Agency will be able to give
final approval of the facilities planning effort and consider several
expected Step 2 and 3 applications.
JUN
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Oh1°
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law:Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 6/1/80
(ActuaLor anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $538,393
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $457,634
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
This grant, when approved, will be to the Ohio Department of Agriculture to
(1) enforce Sections 7 ,8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement
program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry
and user groups.
A draft grant application was received on May 2, 1980. The application is
under review and comments appear favorable. ARegional Pesticide Enforcement
Grant Selection panel will be convened for final approval upon completion
of review.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AN'D/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioMontgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,849
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 5117,637
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting
of incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards
contributed to the interest in resource recovery) are all being
considered as project development options for the Dayton area. Project
efforts are focusing on market development. EPA has approved extension
of the project period.
-------
STAT'JS "EP^T - T/-T3 AND/C? :?V!T APPLICATIONS
State or" Oh\o--'Iontgonery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous fateH-rils Division
3RANCH: Waste Management "ranch
Authoriz'ng Section/Law: 40Q8(a)(2j/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
2ate of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,3-19
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Arcojnt: SI 17,537
(Actual or proposed)
Population served:
Brief description o* project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of 'ncinera-
tors (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed to the interest
in resource recovery) ara all being considered as project development options for
the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and public
participation are the principal activities to be supported under this cooperative
agreement.
A general consultant is being hired. The City of Cayton has agreed to go along
with the project until actual costs are determined. Several potential markets
have surfaced.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio--Cuhahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Expected tonnage: 2,000-3,000 TPD
Brief description of project or program covered:
Cuyahoga County's cooperative agreement for $248,786 covers Phase II,
procurement activities, of a study to determine the feasibility of a
2,000-3,000 tpd resource recovery facility to serve Cleveland and
supply steam energy to a major industrial complex. The Cooperative
Agreement project period has been extended to August 31, 1980. The
County has requested assistance from the TA Panels contractor to
conduct a source separation study. A draft workscope for Phase III
will be submitted by the County by the end of May.
-------
ST;
1: c D r: o o D
AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISITI: Air and Hazardous '''atarials Division
BRANCH: vlaste tfanageTient Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003 (a)(1); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1975 (RCRA)
Data of Award:
(-ctual or anticipated^
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
Pending indirect rate determination
1,230,000 (proposed)
519,913 (proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must -ieet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements "'nclude: the formal identification o~
responsible solid waste management agencies ar all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal imoediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AfiD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH:
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Anount:
(Actual or proposed)
577,000 (proposed)
533,251 (proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by
Section 3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific
time, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the
program in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature
include: resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and
manifest system development; expansion of surveillance and enforcement programs;
public participation; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
MAR
-------
STATUS RSIPORT - G^V'ITS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of 0hi o -C11yahoga Coimt y
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1970
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $243,786
(Actual or proposed)
Expected tonnage: 2,000-3,000 Tpn
Population served:
Brief description of project or program covered:
Cuyahoga County's cooperative agreenent for $248,786 covers Phase II, procurement
activities, of a study to determine the feasibility of a 2,000-3,000 tpd resource
recovery facility to serve Cleveland and supply steam energy to a major industrial
complex.
The County has identified a project manager and hired a consultant. The consultant
and the County have begun preliminary work in several areas, including public partici-
pation. <\n extension of the cooperative agreement from June 30, 1980, to August 31,
1980, is being processed. A grant amendment to fund a source separation study is
being considered.
MAR 1990
-------
STATUS REPCHT - GR.-VITS AND/OR GRA'iT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohi o--Montgcp;ery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual Or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,349
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637
(Actual or proposed)
Population served:
Brief description of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of incinera-
tors (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed to the interest
in resource recovery) are all being considered as nroject development options for
the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and public
participation are the principal activities to be supported under this cooperative
agreement.
A general consultant is being hired. The City of Dayton has agreed to go along
with the project until actual costs are determined. Several potential markets
have surfaced.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Jhio--Toledo "etropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $157,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $117,714
(Actual or proposed)
Population served: 534,000
Brief description of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to process
1,000-1,500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will support
existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a full-service
vendor.
A consultant has been selected for the project and a contract signed. The antici-
pated energy market has withdrawn from project and therefore, a new marketing scheme
is currently being investigated. Ten month initial phase anticipated.
MAR
1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section ^008 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1975 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 1,230,000 (proposed)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 619,913 (proposed)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
NEIC representatives inspected the OHDA laboratory facilities on February 4,
1980. Results of this inspection have been transmitted to Region V for
review.
EPA and OHDA are discussing the possibilities of developing a non-primacy
use enforcement agreement which would address marketplace and producer
establishment inspections and sample collection.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS UEPQP.T - GRANTS AMU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioMontgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division .
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Lavr. 4C03(a)(2)/Resourca Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,849 ' .
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 5117,637 .
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this cooperative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
\. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, viithin that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"local agencies, "planning agencies, others) - .
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants cr construction grants.
v
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GPA'iTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BRA',CH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(«ctusl or anticipated)
Project Cose:
(/'.ct^sl or proposed)
Federal Grant Amci $121,253
(Actual or propose;
Brief description o.- project or program covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANDAOR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioCuyahoga County . i
DIVISION: Air and Hazardgus Materials Division ;
i
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act * \
\
Date of Award: August 2, 1979 . " " I
(Actual or anticipated) . t
*
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed) J
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786 l
(Actual or proposed) |
i
Brief description of project or prograw covered: !
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to Stats agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
1S30
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio-Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION; Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law. 4003(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 3155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 5116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals' for_an energy recovery facility to
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agancies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do'joal Include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of Oh1°
DIYISIG": Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Managenient Branch " '
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservative and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
>* (Actual or anticipated) Jan. 1, 1980
Total Project Cost: 577,000
or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Acfrjfr} or proposed) 533,251
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste monajenient
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Huvironntent-il Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; 1s-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development.; jxpancion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic'.patio1.; abandons J site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCT I OWS: '. ' '
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or p'ogra;n c ntr., dc.-'ve
or ur.tier consideration, within that State (include grants to '>tuts a-j-'i-cr.
Vocal s^sncics, pianning agencies, others)
2. Do jini .include Ff 19SQ program grints or. constn-.ctio^ g:.. .ti.
3. Treat each supplemental request s
-------
.
State of Ohio _ ;
v
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division *
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4QOS(a}(I); Resource Conservation ind Rcco/ery'-
Act of 1976 (RCRA) :
Date of Award: . \
(Actual or anticipated) Jan. 1, 1980 - :
Total Project Cost: nnn
C&tiaal or proposed) 1.230,000
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual. cr proposed)
Brief description of project or program' covers !: This gran', is awa»-dej to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federo: criteria, ard
development of State Solid k'aste Management Plr-ns, as dofined fn regu' atior.s man-
datad by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain plotnvinq 'sqi.ir.'nient^ in
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding. Th»:-- piantr.ng require-
ments include: the formal identification of recponsihle solid ..asze nv.na jen.ent
agencies at e.ll levels of government; development of le-jai arv, regulator/ authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal cri ten's; rerni/ai of f.er'cain legal
impediirents ta resource recovery; and planning for adequate r.cility r.apicity, if
funding permits.
IKSTRUCTIOMS:
1. Templets forms, by State, for all projc-rt or pro-jra1^ ^"-nts,
or ^ : tig r c on s i ci e r a t i c n , w i t h i n that State (include chants Ic r-i:?.ce
local i»noncfss , pi anm no ocancies, others)
2. Co no! include FY K-30 program grants or ro'istn-rhon c.r.-'t:.
3. Treat each supplemental request ss
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/KW GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioCyyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1979 . *
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or progranr covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants-.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
"Cl
> * *
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioMontgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials .Division
' ' '
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch ...
* J
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) ."
Total Project Cost: $156,849' . '. . '
(Actual or proposed) ' : -
» /
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637 . -." . .
(Actual or proposed)
'
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and. the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emiss/ipri standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this coooerative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
V
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio-Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
1
Total Project Cost: $155,510 .
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633 -
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals- for_an energy recovery facility to
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do'jisl Include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
Df
-------
C-I . ': -')', . " I , ,'''' it,,-,- r - ' .
O 1 ,' k i . -' , , . i * J. i - L j , ' i / , f ..',,. i . , . . ., > i > . j
. ._...... . ^
St.ai-.c- of ohi°
DIVISION Air & Hazardous Materials
r.iV-'n;- Pesticides
Aphorizing S-.ction/«..-/: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
D^lsc of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of projsct or program covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forr.s, by State, for all project cr program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencies
local agenci es , pi anni ng agencies, others)
_.*f'~- ~ - r-
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
V
IV A 1
STATUS REPORT - GFlAii I'S /uiD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
' State of Chl0' To1edo
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a-gencies, plannfng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
V
IV A 2
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR CRAJiT AMPUTATIONS
State of Ohio; Steufcennlle
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials DivisrKM
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Reivn A.;r Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program cove rni;;
Monitoring support provided by the 'Steuberv.Ute. agsncy for a
special Harvard University indoor/outdoor rror,5torfng and health study.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all projector p rag nil grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (-Vfilu-de grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately-.
JUL
-------
\
IV A 3
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, St.oubenvilVG
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $328 472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) . ?
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration., within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 4
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Portsmouth
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . .
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $197,400
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,900 ' .-
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
\
IV A 5
STATUS REPORT -.GRANTS AND/OR.GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Cleveland
DIVISION: /\ir and Hazardous Materials Division
\
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: February 23, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) J
Total Project Cost: $1,446,305
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: *,-r, 71I-
(Actual or proposed) *ooi,/ia
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention- and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do riot, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
' JUL
-------
IV A 6
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS'
State of Ohio, Cincinnati
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
(Actual or'proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:. $685,407
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
\
IV A 7
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Canton
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 16, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $291,601
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $148,133
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention, and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, "planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. .
JUL
-------
" IV A 8
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATions
State of Ohi0' Akron
DIVISION: Ajr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $222,997
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY I960 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 9
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,094,950
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $473,297
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary" and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
prjjnder consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do .npl include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. .
JUL
-------
IV A' 10
STATUS.REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mansf 1 eld-R1 ^Inmjj^m^fy^
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . .
'BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation .of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agenciesv others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
J.J-, iv A 1
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mahoni ng-Trumbu1_1 Count 1 es
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $217 516
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $132 228 - ' .
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do .not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 12
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATION'S,
State of Ohio, Lake County
DIVISION: /\-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Divisic^
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the (Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,584
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covers-ir.
To assist local agency in carrying out its rolle tin the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control! if air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all proje^ct or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, jf!arming agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 1
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of
Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 15. 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
/«.-, _i\
(Actual-or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
/ * . -i j\
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To Assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, viithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies," planning agencies, others)
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 1
i
.4
i
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS'AND/OR GRA[;1JJ\PPLICATION$
State of Ohio '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous'Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticide'Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: >IFRA Sec: 23(a)
Date of Award: Cannot be anticipated
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: Grant application has not been received.
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: See above.
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
Draft Cooperative Enforcement Agreement has been sent to Regional Counsel for
legal review (7/5/79). '' " .
JUL
-------
IV A 15
\
DIVISION:
BRANCH:
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
Air and Hazardous Materials
Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: 6/14/79
(Actua.1 or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $132,947
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $26,833
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved state plan under section 4(a)(2)
of FIFRA, as emended. The state-administered applicator training programs
which support the certification program are not funded out of the cost enumer-
ated above.
JUL
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS » 16
State of OHIO - NOACA
DIVISION: WATER
BRANCH: Water Quality Management'Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cwA-208"
Date of Award: 9-1-1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 290-°
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) 140*8
Brief description of project or program" covered:
FY 1980 Water Quality Work Program Description of water quality-
projects to be undertaken by NOACA during FY 1980
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 17
State of OHIO - EDATA _
DIVISION:
BRANCH: water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: CWA 208
Date of Award: ' 9-1-1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 132*b
Federal Grant Amount: _ .
(Actual or proposed) *
Brief description of project or program' covered:
208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning - Continuing Planning
Process.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not., include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
1S
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 13
488
State of Ohio OKI
DIVISION: . Water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: CWA 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: IQS.O
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 58.5
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-" covered:
Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or'program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS' 455
State of Ohio - MVRPC
DIVISION: . water
BRANCH: Water Management Quality Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cw* 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: go.o
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program'covered:
FY-1980 Continuation funding for Section 208 (PL 95-21F) Water Quality Managen
Planning in the Miami Valley Region
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
20
S; REPORT GP.AMTS AMO/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - CUYAHOGA COUNTY
AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
,i
,**
.-, BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
I
"' Author!? t.ig Section/Law: 4008 (a)[2)/RCRA
Date of /-"ward: September 1, 1979
(Actual
-------
4r 9
BMK £ -
"1*' '"'* t- A. Ju
R GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - TOLEDO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
DIVISION- AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
Authoring Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of i^ard: September 15, 1979
(Actual !)- anticipated;
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual o- proposed)
Federal G^ant Amount: $116,633
(Actual o" proposed)
Brief des:riptiori of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery
facility to process 100-1500 tpd from the Toledo area.
This cooperative agreement will support existing system analysis,
project management, and selection of a full service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
idcaT"T(;3ncles"r^"ranni"ng agencies, others)
2. Do r.jt include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 19'
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - MONTGOMERY COUNTY
DIVISION: AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $160,000
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Resource recovery efforts spanning several years are once again Unsettled
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to complywith air erafiission standards
contributed to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered
as project development options for the Dayton area.
The major remaining obstacle in negotiations between Montgomery County and
USEPA is the County's desire to bid for and hire a full service contractor
a strategy which USEPA regards as very premature.
Montgomery County has been designated an "exempted project" by headquarters,
as a result of its complexity and budgetary magnitude. Therefore, headquarters
reserves the right to approve the budget, workscope and ceiling of this
INSTRUCTIONS: coonerative agreement.
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, activa
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 19'
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
*
DIVISION:
23
Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRANCH:
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law:
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
or proposed)
Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery -
Act of 1976 (RCRA) \
I
July 23, 1979 i
i
$856,643
$246,408 ($551,000 allocated)
Brief description of project or program-'covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal criteria, and
development of State Solid Haste Management Plans, as defined in regulations man-
dated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding. These planning require-
ments include: the formal identification of responsible solid waste management
agencies at all levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal
impediments to resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if
funding permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants tc State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1379
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of ohi°
*
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $226,814
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated)
Brief description of project or program-' covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; expansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation; abandoned site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to Stata agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
*
2. Do nai. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 197?
-------
25
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANID/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio __.
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticide Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide,
Act, as amended, Section 23(a)
Date of Award: cannot be anticipated
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: Grant application has not been received
(Aetna ' or proposed/
Federal Grant AmQij'"1": see above
(Actual or propose-:'-
Brief description cr project or program covered:
Regional Counsel has completed review of proposed agreement. Pesticide
Branch has not received these changes as of 8/3/79.
AUG
-------
23
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/14/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $132,947
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $26,833
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator
certification program in accordance with the EPA approved State
Plan under section 4(a)(2) of FIFRA, as amended. The state-administered
applicator training programs which support the certification program
are not funded out of costs enumerated above.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Late - August 1979.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $267,900.
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $267,900.
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
School Boiler Inventory
Review of Stack of Fuel Sampling Regulations
Safety and Wiring Update
Assistance for Dispersion Modeling
Air Monitoring and Audio Visual Equipment .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 23
State of Ohi0' To1edo
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie:
local agencies," planning agencies, others)
2.. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - C.RANTj_A!ID/OR GRANT A_P_PL I CAT IONS. 2 9
State of Ohio; Steubenvi'Tle
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: too onc .- :"
/« . ^ -J\ .p£-t- jUVJJ
(Actual or proposed)
. . >»
B *
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Monitoring support provided by the Steubenville agency for a
special Harvard ' University indoor/outdoor monitoring and health study.
I
1 INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all'project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencie
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
30
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRfrNT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Steubenville
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air-Programs Branch
»
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $328,472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention,and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thln that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, "planning agencies, others)
2. Do jLQi include FY 1980 program grants or construction grant's.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 31
State of Ohio, Portsmouth
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
i BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
; Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 197a
(Actual or anticipated)
j Total Project Cost: $197,400
; (Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,900
(Actual or proposed)
*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
I To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
i Implementation Plan -for prevention and control of.air pollution and
j implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
I _ t
i
1
j
INSTRUCTIONS: ' .'
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State- (include grants to State agencies,
Toe a1 a ge n c i e s, planning agencies, others)
-''
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS.
State Of Ohio, Cleveland
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' 1
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
February 23, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual' or proposed)
$1,446,305
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$551,715'
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards,
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
>
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
j ' - . STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR^GRAiiT _APPi:iCATIOnS 33
\ State of Ohio> Cincinnati .
' ~
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
j BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
j Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
{Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $685,407
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role, in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
.]
?
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)-
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS. A'l_P/.Cg_GRANT L APPLICATION
State of Ohio, Car.ton _
DIVISION: /\jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
*
BRANCH: Air, Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: '
(Actual o'r anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual- or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
March 16, 1979
$291,601
$148,133 .-
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
'local a.gencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
,
"4
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS, 0_
. a 3
State of
Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $3 461 353
(Actual or proposed) ' '
Federal Grant Amount: $750,000
(Actual or proposed) _ -
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
J INSTRUCTIONS
I 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
I ' or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
-j local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Lake County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Diviri£»a
BRANCH: Air Programs 'Branch
*
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the; CD-ess Air /vet
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,584
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered!:-
To assist local agency in carrying out its rcil.-s: Tr.it the dp/proved State
Implementation Plan for prevention^ and control &$ air p-rllfution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Kir Quality Standards.
/
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project er program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
,1
\ ' 2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mahoning-Trumbull Counties
DIVISION: y\-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
"I
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $217> 516
(Actual or proposed) . :
Federal Grant Amount: $132 228
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencie.'
local agencTesT~p'»2nnin9 agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1!
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRAI1TS AND/OR GRAUT APPLICATIONS.
State of Ohio, Mansfiold-Ricbland County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: -Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
May 17, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
$54,127
Federal Gran tr Amount:
.(Actual or proposed)
'$33,252
»*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation.PI an for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: . .'
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State-(include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Oirk), Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH:
Air Programs 'Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$1,094,950
$473,297
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality-Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencie;
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
.STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRA?1T APPLICATIONS 4-3
State of Ohl0' Akron
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divis-i'orr
<*
1,
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Cte-ot' Air tfct
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .<,
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
! Federal Grant Amount: $222,997
(Actual or--proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered!:
To assist local agency in carrying out its r©l£ in the approved State
Implementation Plan for preventioa and contra?. sfr air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secooiarg* Afr Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project! or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (wcTude1 grants to State agencie
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
>
3. Treat each supplemental request separately/-
j ' . AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
*
State of OhioToledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management -Branch -
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to
process 100-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
- full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or jjnde_r consideration viithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, pTanhirfg agencies, others)
2. Do nol include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of Ohio--Cuyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . -'.
i.?z
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20; 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: , $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program'covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a. major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
6r under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
locaT agencies, pTanmTng agencies, others)
2. Do noJL include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio^-^'ontgomerv County
DIVISION'. Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008 (a) (2) /Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date "of Award: September 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: _ $155,300
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,386
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-' covered:
Resource recovery efforts spanning several years are once again unsettled.
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
The major remaining obstacle in negotiations between Montgomery County and
USEPA is the County's desire to bid for and hire a full service contractor,
a strategy which USEPA regards as very premature.
Montgomery County has been designated an "exempted project" by headquarters,
as a result of its complexity and budgetary magnitude. Therefore, headquarters
reserves the right to approve the budget, workscope, and ceiling of this
eTa±ive (..agreement.
6
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under c_on si deration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
loca~l agencies, pTarmTng agencies, others)
?., Do no! include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
Ohio
DIYISIu';: Air and Hazardous Materials
" Pesticides
Authorizi'ia Section/La,-,: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/21/79
Tote' 3~jict Cost^ $133,420
"- $26,833
Administration and maintenance of the Ohio pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved State Plan under section 4 of
the FIFRA.
-------
STATUS REPOPF
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Late - August 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $267,90-0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $267,900
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
School Boiler Inventory
Review of Stack of Fuel Sampling Regulations
Safety and Wiring Update
Assistance for Dispersion Modeling
Air Monitoring and Audio Visual Equipment
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete, forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
_or un^ej^ccns^d£ratT_on, within that State (include grants to State agencies
Toca"T~agenc"ieTri^TnnTng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of _ Gil^> JL^lll>ci'.'i"LL]c-'_
DIVISION': Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 'of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 8, 3979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
-------
of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Kdteria Is Division
BRANCH: Air Prograns Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTIONS: '
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
9~rjjnjdDr_ consideration, v.'ithin that State (include ('rants to Store ngencii
local agencies, p]?.;:;ri7>3 agencies, others)
2.. Do jio_t include FY 1980 prcgrcrn grants or construction grants.
i
3. Trc-at each supplemental request separately.
-------
Stale of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lavr. Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $197,400
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126?900
(Actual or proposed) ' .
»*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
impleraentstion of national Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: ' .'
1. Complete forris, by State, for all project or program grants, activ-
orjjnder consideration, v.'ithin that State- (include grants to Sidle ager,c/
Tocal "agencies, plUTuTTiTg agencies, others)
2. Di .not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of Oh KJ , St oub."!iv i l_lp_
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' .
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $323,472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) ?'
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention, and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
, '-. 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
] or under consideration, v.nthin that State (include grants to State ngencie
| Tocfal 'ogencfeTY plenhTng agencies, others)
1
2. Do .not include FY 19CD program, grants or construction granLs.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of t''ni°> Mr.hon. ii/j-TrumUil 1 CounLios
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)_
Total Project Cost: $217? 516
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $122 228
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implenisntaticr, of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
.
I
1 ^ INSTRUCTIONS:
1, Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active;
or under considerati on, vithin that State (include grants to State anencv
"local" age?icicfs7 pITnTTirTg agencies, oth&rs)
x
2. Do not. include FY 1930 prograr.i grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
C' l-
Statc of Ohio, Mansf ic 10 ..!; iiJQjij.UL Counb/__
DIVISION: /\-jr an(;S Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
May 17, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
$54,127
Federal Grant Amount:
.-(Actual or proposed)
'$33,252
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of a'ir pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: . . .'
1. Complete forms, by Slate, for all project or program grants, active
PL^yD^L^-^^l^^^J-A^fli. v'"' -^n ^iat State-(include grants to State anenci
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
X
2. CD .not include FY 1900 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of 0; i i o ,_j b.'i t gom:- ry__ Cj!_un 1 y_
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lew: Section 105 of the Clean-Air Act
Date of Award: - February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,094,950
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $473,297
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State (include grants to Slate anencic
local a g e n c" i e~s,~p"1 ennTn~g agencies, others)
2. Do jiot. include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divisor;-
\
BRANCH: 7\ir Programs Branch ' ;
Authorizing Secti on/Lav,1 : Section 105 of the' C.V.cfin- Air Act
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $222,997 ___ '
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program coverec;':
To assist local agency in carrying out its r;c?,e i"n tlv* sparcved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and contra"; :ufr air pc'Uut^on end
implementation of National Primary and Secon^irv- Ai'r Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all pro>'Ac;t or pra-gram grants, r.ctive
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (iincTude grants to State agencies
Tocal agencies, pl"annTng agencies, others)
2. Do jnp_t include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separatT-liy^
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous !-',aU>rials Division
BRANCH: Air, Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clsavi Air Act
Date of Av;ard:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
March 16, 1979
$291,601
$148,133 .
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying cut its role in the Dporoveci State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of a^r p-/notion and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards. .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or_under consideration, vrithin that State (include era tits to State r.cencv
local agencies, "pTalmTng agencies, others)
2. Do jiot include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
-
i State of
'
DIVISION: /\-jr Qncj Hazardous Kotcrials Division
j BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
j Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 105 of the Clean Air "Act
Date of Award: . May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $685,407
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
impleroentatiin of national Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by Stats, for all project or program grants, active
or u n d e r con si dor a. t i o n, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a e, e n c i es~,~p~lli :Tn fii 3 agencies, others)-
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
...:LJiQJ_C)iiI_i_.t;£1DJ?.. A'£/c:\.GJ^I'LA-';'i-J_fl-!iU.cl:.:3.
State of Ohio, Clcvjljirid
DIVISION: /\-jr arid Hazardous Materials Division
1 t
BRANCH: .Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
February 23, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual' or proposed.)
$1,146,305
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$551,715'
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention cine ccr.trol of air pollution and
inplemeritatic": of National Primary and Secondary Air Quail ly' Standards.
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vithin th?t State (include grants to State aoer.ci>
local"Iig£~ncfes ,~~pY27irrThg agencies, others)
2. Do .not, include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Diviriir,
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' ._
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the1 Ox^ JVir net
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,534
(Actual or proposed)
--
Brief description, of project or program covera-
To assist local aqency in carrying out its rol-f ""in tbs ..'{"-proved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control c..r a.i;~ p'/fifution end.
Implementc-tlon of National Primary and Secondary Air Qua 1 ity Standards.
i
IHSTRUCT!C;;S:
1. Complete forms, by State> for all project cr procram grants, active
^^iL^L^lsJ^^D'l^liiLLL within that State (includV: grants to State agencie:
'IdcaT agencies,~planTTing agencies, others)
2. Do jiot include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATIC p.r.pG:;.7_
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: <-> /r,-| ->r,o
/ ., ,\ iOj'rUj.sJj^)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $750,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist Stc.ie in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention end control of air
pollution and ip.Dl emendation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
\ INSTRUCTIONS
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration., v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies
""""~"
}
i ^_j Tl.'.-'.' T I_ _'___ ~ '__ *_ .
] local agencies j planp.Kig agencies , others)
j
i
2. Do .nol. include FY 19P/J progrr-r; grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supple^rtal request separately.
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divivuv]
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4QOS(a)(i); Resource Consp.vation jnd Keco/ery"
Act of 1975 ;RCRA)
Data of Award:
*' (A£tjB3_or anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
or proposed) $055,643
Federal CrMnt Amount:
nl or proposed) $246,408 ($551,000 :. I located)
Brief description of project or prou^m'c.ow<:J: Tin3 gn^. is £'.,-a de] to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal faci icies tviou :;n ':eo;:;i. c> :te.--a. arc!
development of State Solid V'aste Man a qciic.it Pi-..r,, as dc-ef i.ic-L Y, ; ?OM";;' .or :; nan-
datsd by Section 4C-.V of RCHA. ficates nnsl: -e.ir ce;-L;i': pla;;,',i<, -:";-',:'-^;,;i PCS in
the rec,ulacions in order *o re;n.i;n elirntve ;~c> \u\c~'?). Tn-.-... ;-"i t.^n":...' '-qn^re-
>;;ent5 include: the formal :d:nt; "icauion or rt: ,,H n.^lf-!e so i i j a . .;e i.1-.;., j'.r,?,':
agencies at .'.li levels of govoriinient; Jcvi-'o.irr.'it of 'e;! :. . r>- i--'.o\ ri:thori-
r.ies over land dispose.!, based upon tne Fedei'a > tr~i {.:<: i:,' r':."' .11 r*" >-._- ^Yo ^egal
i.^pediirents to resource recovery; and planning -~r:r af'eq^iC£- , ';'-,:_/ fap.cicy. if
funding permit;.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. f.otnplets fores, by State» for all project or ^r-ojrai .; "r:-, a..-,v^ j^ ^
Qj" under^^co^sj^.gration, within that State (inriurjc f/'-mti Ic r-:;-.LC a^'-fcvr:, **','
'VbcTT"i}C|enc'!SSl pTati7nng agencies, others) ii~
'W
2. Do BQi include FY 15£0 program grants or ro-istr-rtion '.,- :;,, ' "
3. Tr^et each supplemental request separately.
-------
Al:-TLi./jLi'ii.'_..:_.L:F.:v.'.- .."'.-....'Ji*'.'.*'. ' : IC^'j i()->
3" icj? of .?10 .... _
niVlSIO!!; --"M >" and Mai-.srdou^ Ma', u* \ . i s Ji\'i:. i;ir
n'-;,",NCH: Ua> le Managenent Bi-a,Kh
at,thorizir!0 S-cticn/l.a,v: Section 3011: Rcsou.-ce Conservacir, ?/id f^.cverj, Act
of i57o (RCRA)
Data of Award.
i (Actyal. cr anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(££lMl or proposed) $226,814
federal Grant Amount: ?
(ZLClUjI or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated) I
**'
Brief description of project or program covered: This gr?:r: is awarded to sup- i'-"':
pert the eventual development or a fully authon'zed hazardous waste nvjnajenierr; jf:.'
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section J006 o, RCRA. Irs 'states t"'
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tii^e, the U. S. ..'.vironnir;ntji F"o-- T"
tectionAgency will use these funds to operate che prog-am IP 1,,nat Str.te. Some of j'
the activities that are developmental in nat.uro include: resource assc ss ,:er,t; Ic '',
gal and regulatory development; oarmii: end manifest sysLorn do1'.-: Ic.^n.en1.; jxcansion '
of surveillance and enforcement programs; puolic participaiio1., acandon^J site and
errergoncy response programs. 1-
INSTRUCT I CMS:
. ^ta for,T:s, i?y S^ate, for nil p."c,;ert ,-r f'OTra." :
or w.d^r_cpr.3_id2ration, within thit Statu (ipcludo ^'..ui1. v t '. , ':
To^fal agencies, pTaiTiiTng ng ancle-; , others)
' *
2. Do jioj;, induce FC 1930 procron gr^iins cr c-:nstri,c,t:o"! .
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous MattYials Division
- BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Co:iservatir/> and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
*' (Act.ua! cr anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Frojoct Cost:
(fi£iiia.L °r proposed) $226,814
Federal Grant Amount:
or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated) '
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to sup- i
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management I
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. '.".nvironmental Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to oper?te the program in that State. Some of ;
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assoss'.ient; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; jxpansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic'iparioM, abandoneJ site and
emergency response programs. i-
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Cr-mp!ete forms, by State, for all project or p'oqro;n c ,nts,
or ur.de r_ corys i dgrat I on, vn th i n thai: State: (include grants tc \*.?.t =
" * a^enr'ies, pTan~nsng agencies, others)
2. D.-) JIQ.L include Fr 1930 program grants or. constriction gr, ,ti».
3. Treat each supplenental request srr
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
1 BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(n)(i); Resource Conse.-y/ation jnd Roco/ery'-
Act of 197G (RCfW) ,
Date of Award:
fc (AOuulor anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(/&-UiaJL or proposed) $856,643
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $246,408 ($551,000 allocated)
Brief description of project Q*" program' cowreJ: This gran: is awa*deJ to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federo : criteria, ar.d
development of State Solid Waste Management Plr.r.s, as defined :r, regulat ior.s man- ,
dated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain plcsrninq requirements in '
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding.. The ,_ planning rf. quire-
ments include: the formal identification of responsible solid waste iiv.najeT.ent
agencies at e.ll leveU of government; development of legal an-, regulator/ Authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; rem.;al of certain legal
irrpedirents to resource recovery; and planning for adequate r.c.ility r.apicity, if <
funding permits.
\\
INSTRUCTIONS:
Complete forms, by State, for all project or program ^nts, active
u.itiqr consideration, within that State (include chants lc r-tate u'^ncie
aTTjgiirfci'ss, plahrnng ogsncies, others)
2. Do jiQi include FY 1550 program grants or ronstriTtion (,r."ts.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of Ohio--Cuyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date ef Award: August 2, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or u n d e r consider a t ion, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a ge ncTesTpTannTng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants-.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS PEP?^," - 'T"Y"S -V -'^ "";T A^M"~r
State or _Qhl(L
'v,: Air Si Hazardous Materials Division
: Pesticides
-'z-inn Section/Lc.-.: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
c -":,:,.-d: cannot be anticipated
$121,353
$103,000
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application.
-------
STATUS REPORI -_ G^" 'ITS ATVOR _GF;A:n__ A^lrJC'J^
State of _0hio_
-'C'i: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
Pesticides
riling Section/Lav;: Section 23(a)(2), FIFRA, as amended
r.f A.-i-d: 6/21/79
ject Cose: $133,420
$26,833
" ":jr:t or program coverc-J:
Provide funds to supplement costs of state pesticide applicator certification
program during FY 79.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohi o-Toledo Metropoli tan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air a.nd Hazardous Materials .Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
' ' &
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to ?.--
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will ir'
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
I-..-.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do jot include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
t»*.*irt*-
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OhioMontgomery County '-;-.
>'.'.'
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials .Division , - i-V:":',;
*'*'"*
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch .-
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979 ; '^^
(Actual or anticipated) p^-;l
. **:': -'..
Total Project Cost: $156,849 : -' '' . ft:"
(Actual or proposed) ;-
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637 .
(Actual or proposed) ' ;
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of 0TT
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emiss.iph standards contributed V.;;:..
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project i-.,..;,'
development options for the Dayton area. K
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this cooperative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others) :
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
SIS UPDATE
LOG
MONTH JULY
WISCONSIN
YEAR
1979
(state)
Last UPDATE Issued In:
PART I
Environmental Agencies
Executive Branch
Legislative Branch
Agencies, Commissions
and Boards
Public Interest Groups
State Environmental
Legislation
PART II
Regional Program Staff
PART III
GRANT STATUS REPORT
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
'ART IV A GRANTS /APPL
FEE
MARCH
APRII
MAY
JUNE
JULY
1
2-4a
5-8
9-11
1-6
AUC
SEP"
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
1
File at beginning of the appropriate state section, replacing previous log,
111!
-------
Wl I 1
Ul
u
cc
o
Ul
CC
cc
3
O W
sSISg
3 Q u- Q Q.
03
&
Ul
a
c
o
!«!
o b i,
g £ "oi o« 5
HI
3 UIU. u. 0. It E Q
u
wQ
§
< s
" - >
3 ^
1 3
C _
am
i
* r r = 3 ^
^ 0 0 Q 0 «
u Z Z (/i c/i >
£« 5,8
= a
OS
o
c i
IS
e c 2
a g -
551*1
a u
NATURAL RESOURCES
2/79
-------
Wl I 2
WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
P. 0. Box 7921
Pyare. Square Building
4610 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53703
Secretary of Natural Resources:
Deputy Secretary:
Executive Assistant:
Legislative Liaison:
Aid Programs and Federal Funding
Inland Lake Renewal
Planning and Analysis
Bureau of Aid Programs:
Environmental Impact Bureau
Finance Bureau
Information and Education Bureau
Legal Services Bureau
Planning Bureau
Research Bureau
Enforcement Division-
Administrator
Director, Law Enforcement
Director, Water Regulation
and Zoning
Chief, Compliance
Natural Resources Board
Chairperson: Clifford F. Messinger
Vice Chair: Daniel T. Flaherty
Secretary: John C. Brogan
Members:
Catherine Conroy
Richard A. Hemp
Divisions:
(608) 266-2121
Anthony S- Earl
Andrew C. Damon
W. Michael Ley
Kristin R. Visser
Paul N. Guthrie, Jr.
0. D.. Williams
Bruce B. Braun
Eric P. Jensen
Howard Druckenmiller
Clarence Goldsworthy
Jeffrey W. Smoller
James A. Kurtz-
Arthur D. Doll
Cyril Kabat
Andrew C.
Donald L.
Damon
Beghin
Floyd F. Stautz
John C. Fontaine
-2175
-0836
-3125
-2197
-2359
-0860
-2951
-2747
-3695
-0818
-8170
-2121
-1115
-8034
-2672
John A. Lawtcn
Steve Pavich
Environmental Standards Division
Thomas A. Kroehn, Administrator
Air Management Bureau
Robert A. Arnott, Director
Water Quality Bureau
Carl J. Blabaum, Director
Solid Waste Management Bureau
Robert Krill, Director
-1099
-0603
-6910
-1327
2/79
-------
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Divisions (cont'd)
Research Management Division
Carroll D. Besadny, Administrator
Office of Land Lake Renewal
0. D. Williams, Director
Bureau, of Research
___._Cyril Kabat,^Director
Bureau, of Engineering
Jerald D- Slack,. Director
Bureau of Fish Management
James T. Addis,. Director
Bureau of Forestry
Milton E. Reinke, Director
Bureau of Parks and Recreation
Donald JT. Mackie, Director
Bureau of Real Estate
Edward J. Faber, Director
Bureau of Wildlife Management
John M. Keener, Director
Office of Lands
James R. Huntoon, Director-
WI I J
Services Division
Administrator
Office Services Bureau
Robert H. Mayfield, Director
Personnel Bureau
Robert W. Conner, Director
Trust Lands and Investments Division
Stephen E. Gauger, Administrator
Field Districts:
Lake Michigan District
Charles E. Higgs, District Director
North Central District
John G. Brasch, District Director
Northwest District
Arthur A. Oehmcke, District Director
Southeast District
Robert F. Winne, District Director
(608) 266-0837
-3125
-8170
-2136
-7025
-0842
-2152
-0201
-2193
-3462
-8933
-2452
-2472
-1370
(414) 497-4040
(715) 362-7617
(715) 635-2101
(414) 257-6543
2/79
-------
W( [ 1*
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - cont'd
Field Districts: (cont'd)
Southern District
Douglas W. Morrissette
West Central District
James L. Lissack, District Director
(608) 266-2131
(715) 836-2821
Councils r
Air Pollution Control Council
Inland Lakes Protection and Rehabilitation Council
Mine Reclamation Council
Natural Resources Council of State Agencies
PCS Advisory Council
Scientific Areas Preservation Council
Snowmobile Recreational Council
Wisconsin Citizens Environmental Council
Wisconsin Conservation Congress, Executive Council
Governmental activities for preserving and protecting natural resources in
Wisconsin are largely the province of the Department of Natural Resources.
The Department of Agriculture and the Board of Soil and Water Conservation
Districts at the University of Wisconsin are also actively involved.
A 7-member, part-time Natural Resources Board is appointed by the governor
to provide policy direction for the programs administered by the Department
of Natural Resources. The board appoints a full-time secretary, who serves
as the chief executive, officer of the department.
Four functional divisions have the primary responsibility for the department's
programs: Environmental Standards Enforcement, Resource Management and
Services.
The field operations of the department are under the direction of six district
directors, each responsible for the total mission of the department in his
or her district. Advisory committees assisting the Natural Resources Board
include,the citizen-elected Conservation Congress, groups on aquatic nuisance
control, research, forest management, county forests, forest pest control,
Great Lakes commercial fishery and outdoor recreation.
2/79
-------
Wl I 5
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES cont'd
The department is responsible for providing an adequate and flexible system
for planning and managing the protection, development and use of the water,
air, forest, fish, game and other plant and wild animal resources of the
state, and for the control of solid waste and refuse disposal. In addition,
the department reviews the natural resources programs of other state
agencies and makes appropriate recommendations to the governor and the
legislature.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (608) 266-1113
Hill Farms State Office Building
4802. Sheboygan Avenue
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary: Zel S. Rice III -1113
Deputy Secretary: Wayne McGown -1113
Executive Assistant Harry L. Peterson -8129
Offices:
Advisory Services James S. Thiel, Director -8810
Information George Bechtel, Director -7744
Policy and Program Analysis Roger Schrantz, Admin. -6479
Divisions:
Aeronautics Fritz E. Wolf, Admin. -3351
Business Management Norbert K. Anderson, Admin. -2878
Highways Robert T. Huber, Chairperson
Highway Commission -2913
Motor Vehicles James 0. Peterson, Admin. -2233
The Department plans and administers highway construction contracts and
maintains the entire state trunk highway system. It administers all
federal funds for highway systems in Wisconsin, licenses vehicles and
drivers, maintains vehicle and driver records, and enforces state traffic
regulations and codes. It is responsible for planning, designing, and
supervising construction of all public airports in Wisconsin, serving as
agent for all airport sponsors who receive state and federal aid. It directs
all-mode transportation planning for the state.
The Department works with the Department of Natural Resources in the estab-
lishment of highway information centers, roadside development, and state
parks roadways. Of increasing importance is the department's comprehensive
consideration of environmental protection and the preservation of state
records, which involve interagency relationships with the federal Environmental
Protection Agency as well as with the state, regional, and local agencies
and the public.
2/79
-------
WT I 6
LU
at
LLL
<
£
«7>
i: i
LU ->'
U_
O
2
H~
z-
<
O
o
a O
4 i i
a 2 « 5 >
2 2 = S -D =
I 5 = £ 5 3
"3 "S - a ^
a. c £ J! ^
^ a a 5 § ^ 5
01 < < o < - <
DOO
2/79
-------
WI I 7
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF WISCONSIN
Mailing Address: State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
GOVERNOR Lee S. Dreyfus (R) . (608) 266-1212
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Russell A. Olson (R) (608) 266-3516
ATTORNEY GENERAL Bronson C. La Follette (D)
SECRETARY OF STATE Vel R. Phillips (D)
2/79
-------
Wl I 8
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION
UNITED STATES SENATE - WISCONSIN
William Proxmire
(D)
Madison, Wisconsin
(414) 272-0388, (608) 252-5338
II. S. Senate
Washington B.C. 20510
(202) 224-5653
Gay lord A.. Nelson (D)
(414) 224-3965 or 224-3966
U-S. Senate
Washington D.C. 20510
(202) 224-5323
UNITED STATES CONGRESS - WISCONSIN
By District
1 Les Aspin D Racine
2 Robert W. Kastenmeier D Sun Prairie
3 Alvin Baldus
5 Henry S. Reuss
D Menomonie
4 Clement J. Zablocki D Milwaukee
D Milwaukee
U. S. House of Represenatives
Washington D.C. 20515
(414) 63,2-8194
(202) 225-3031
(608) 252-5206
(202) 225-2906
(715) 835-4671
(202) 225-5506
(414) 383-4000
(202) 225-4572
(414) 224-1331
(202) 225-3571
David R. Obey
8 Toby Roth
D Wausau
R Appleton
(715) 842-5606
(202) 225-3365
F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. R Shorewood
2/79
-------
Wl I 9
LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
Wisconsin Congressional Districts
«.*.«
SENATORS
Nelson
Proxmire
REPRESENTATIVES
1. Aspin
2. Kastenmeier
3. Baldus
4. Zablodd
5. Reuss
6. Vacant
7. Obey
8. Roth
9. Sensenbrenner
2/79
-------
Wl I 10
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
1979 STATE SENATE
Mailing Address:
By Name
Adelman, Lynn S.
Bablitch, William A.
Bear, Peter
Berger, David G.
Bidwell, Everett V.
Braun, Warren D.
Chilsen, Water John
Cullen, Timothy F.
Flynn, James T.
Frank, Jrt A.
Goyke, Gary R.
Harnisch, Thomas W.
Kleczka, Gerald D.
Kreul, Richard
Krueger, Clifford W.
Lasee, Alan J.
Lorge, Gerald D.
Maurer, John J.
McCallum, J. Scott
Moody, James P.
Murphy, Roger P.
Offner, Paul
Petri, Thomas E.
Radosevich, Michele G,
Risser, Fred A.
Roshell, Marvin J.
Strohl, Joseph
Swan, Monroe
Theno, Daniel 0.
Thompson, Carl W.
Van Sistine, Jerome
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
R
R
D
R
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
28
24
13
5
27
11
29
15
8
7
19
31
3
17
12
L
14
22
18
9
33
32
2
10
26
23
21
6
25
16
30
New Berlin
Stevens Point
Madison
Milwaukee
Portage
Milwaukee
Wausau
Janesville
West Allis
Milwaukee
Oshkosh
Neillsville
Milwaukee
Fennimore
Merrill
De Pere
Bear Creek
Kenosha
Fond du Lac
Milwaukee
Waukesha
La Crosse
Fond du Lac
Hudson
Madison
Chippewa Falls
Racine
Milwaukee
Ashland
Stoughton
Green Bay
State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702
By District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Alan J. Lasee R
Petri>. Thomas E. R
Gerald Kleczka D
David G. Berger D
Monroe Swan D
Kurt Frank D
James T. Flynn D
James P. Moody D
Radosevich, Michele G D
Warren D. Braun
Clifford Krueger
Peter Bear
Gerald Lorge
Timothy Cullen
Carl W. Thompson
Richard Kreul
Scott J. McCallum
Gary R. Goyke
John Strohl
John Maurer
Marvin J. Roshell
William A. Bablitch
Daniel 0. Theno
Fred A. Risser
Everett V. Bidwell
Lynn Adelman
Walter John Chilsen
Jerome Van Sistine
Thomas W, Harnisch
Paul Offner
Roger P. Murphy
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
R
2/79
-------
Wl
11
MEMBERS OF THE 1979 WISCONSIN ASSEMBLY
State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
Representatives
Andrea, Joseph F.
Barczak, Gary J.
Barry, Jonathan B.
Becker, Dismas
Behnke, Robert E.
Bradley, Gordon R.
Broydrick, William B.
Byers, Francis R.
Clarenbach, David E.
Coggs, Marcia P.
Conradt, Ervin W.
Czerwinski, Joseph C.
DeLong, Delmar E.
Dilweg, Gary T.
Donoghue, Sheehan
Dorff, Eugene J.
Duren, Joanne M.
Ellis, Michael G.
Everson, Harland E.
Ferrall, R. Michael
Fischer, Daniel
Flintrop, Richard A.
Gagin, William P.
Gerlach, Chester A.
Goodrich, Patricia A.
Gunderson, Steve
Harer, Robert
Harsdorf, James
Hasenohrl, Donald A.
Hauke, Thomas A.
Helbach, David
Hephner, Gervase A.
Hopkins, David
Jackamonis, Edward G.
Johnson, Gary K.
Johnston, Rod
Kedrowski, David R.
Kincaid, Lloyd H.
Kirby, Michael G.
Klicka, George H.
Laatsch, James F.
Ladwig, E. James
Lallensack, Francis J.
Larson, Robert J.
Lee, Mordecai
Leopold, Stephen R.
Lewis, James R.
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
R
R
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
64
24
47
32
14
57
16
40
78
18
41
27
44
4
35
65
50
55
38
62
3
56
68
21
71
91
29
30
70
23
71
6
67
98
45
10
74
36
13
22
80
63
2
34
31
26
53
Kenosha
West Allis
Mt. Horeb
Milwaukee
Milwaukee
Oshkosh
Milwaukee
Marion
Madison
Milwaukee
Shiocton
Milwaukee
Clinton
Green Bay
Merrill
Kenosha
Cazenovia
Neenah
Edgerton
Racine
Reedsville
Oshkosh
Eau Claire
So. Milw.
Berlin
Osseo
Woodville
Beldenville
Pittsville
West Allis
Stevens Point
Chilton
Chippewa Falls
Waukesha
Beloit
Milw.
Washburn
Crandon
Milw.
Wauwatosa
Arlington
Racine
Manitowoc
Medford
Milw.
Milw.
West Bend
366-0486
0620
5780
7211
0634
7500
1106
3794
8570
3786
2253
8580
1182
3070
7671
0455
7694
8530
2027
0315
5780
7690
9174
5810
1526
8077
1526
9650
8366
0631
5340
0645
8552
3387
8535
1170
1194
0660
5580
2343
9180
2530
0656
7461
2512
5342
8551
2/79
-------
Wl I 12
Lewison, Bernard
Lingren, Ronald H.
Loftus, Thomas A.
Lorman, Hilton
Luckhardt, Esther Doughty
Matty, Richard P.
McClain, Edward F.
McEssy, Earl F.
Medinger, John D.
Menos, Gus G.
Merkt, John L.
Metz, Sharon K.
Miller, Marjorie M.
Munts, Mary Lou
Murray, Thomas B.
Norquist, John 0.
Omernick, Raymond
Opitz, David W.
Otte, Carl
Pabst, Richard E.
Paulson, David
Plewa, John R.
Porter, Cloyd A.
Potter, Calvin
Prosser, David, Jr.
Quackenfaush, Robert L.
Radtke, Randall
Roberts, Virgil
Rogers, William J.
Rboney, James F.
Rutkowski, James A.
Schmidt, Earl
Schneider, Marlin D.
Shabaz, John C.
Shoemaker, Richard A.
Smith, Patricia Spafford
Snyder, Harry G.
Soucie, Kevin <
Swoboda, Lary J.
Tesmer, Louise M.
Thompson, Tommy G.
Travis, David M.
Travis, Robert S., Jr.
Tregoning, Joseph E.
Tuczynski, Phillip J.
Ulichny, Barbara
Vanderperren, Cletus
Wagner, Mary K.
Wahner, James W.
Ward, Walter L., Jr.
Wood, Wayne W.
Young, John M.
R
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
D
R
D
R
D
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
96
97
46
39
54
88
85
52
95
11
12
90
77
76
73
8
86
60
58
33
28
20
43
59
42
92
81
94-
5
61
82
87
93
83
69
75
84
7
1
19
79
37
49
51
9
25
89
66
15
17
48
99
Viroqua
Menomonee Falls
Sun Prairie
Ft . Atkinson
Horicon
Crivitz
Wausau
Fond du Lac
La Crosse
Glendale
Mequon
Green Bay
Madison
Madison
Superior
Milw.
Wittenberg
Port Washington
Sheboygan
Milw.
Amery
Milw.
Burlington
Kohler
Appleton
Sparta
Lake Mills
Holmen
Kaukauna
Racine
Hales Corners
Birnamwood
Wis. Rapids
New Berlin
Menomonie
Rice Lake
Oconomowoc
Milw.
Luxemberg
Milw.
Elroy
Madison
Platteville
Shullsburg
Milw.
Milw.
Green Bay
Salem
Milw.
Milw.
Janesville
Brookf ield
1192
5840
3780
3790
1190
3756
0654
3156
7211
0486
2343
7503
7521
3784
0650
5830
9180
7671
2056
3072
9650
7505
2530
0640
3070
3756
3794
3097
0610
0731
8590
7461
0215
2417
2519
2519
1190
9870
5350
8588
7746
5340
1170
7502
0484
9170
0616
9170
2401
0960
9172
9174
2/79
-------
VI I 13
£.
<
S
5
3
a
a
2/79
-------
Wl I
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
WISCONSIN SENATE
Rules Review
Chairman, Senator David G. Berger
Members:
Monroe Swan
Peter Bear
James P. Moody
Roger P. Murphy
Agriculture, Labor and Local Affairs Committee
Chairman: Senator Jerome Van Sistine
Members :
Marvin J. Ro shell
Carl W. Thompson
Monroe Swan
Richard Kreul
Natural Resources and Tourism Committee
Chairman: Thomas W. Harnisch
Members :
Joseph Strohl
Gary R. Goyke
Jerome Van Sistine
Daniel 0. Theno
Finance Committee
Chairman: Senator Gerald D. Kleczka
Members:
John J. Maurer Paul Offner
James T. Flynn Michele G. Radosevich
Warren D. Braun Walter John Chilsen
2/79
-------
Wl I 15
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEES
Affrn-*nxstrative Rules ComnHttee
Chairperson: William Rogers
Vice Chair: David Clarenbach
Members:
Edward McClain
Mary Wagner
Tommy Thompson
Agriculture Committee
(608) 266-0291
(608) 266-2180
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Harland Everson
Jonathan Barry
Members:
Gervase Hephner
Lary Swoboda
Donald Hasenohrl
Daniel Fischer
Richard Shoemaker
Energy Committee
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Patricia Spafford Smith
Joseph Tregoning
John Merkt
James Harsdorf
David Paulson
James Laatsch
(608) 266-3453
Sharon Metz
David Clarenbach
Members:
R. Michael Ferrall
Mary Lou Hunts
Thomas Loftus
Chester Gerlach
Environmental Resources Committee
Cloyd Porter
Rod Johnston
Robert Barer"
(608) 266- 3453
Chairperson:
Vice-Chair:
Mary Lou Munts
Daniel Fischer
Members:
David Kedrowski
Thomas Loftus
Jonathan Barry
Kevin Soucie
William Broydrick
David Opitz
Randall Radtke
Ray Omerick
William Gagin
2/79
-------
Wl I 16
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
ASSEMBLY (cont'd)
Finance Committee (608) 266-8535
Chairperson: Gary Johnson.
Vice Chair: Carl Otte
Members:
Virgil Roberts
John. Norquist
Ronald Lingren
Michael Kirby
Michael Ellis
Rules Committee (608) 266-0291
Chairperson: Robert Behnke
Vice-Chair: James Wanner (Ex Officio)
Members:
Ed Jackamonis*
R. Michael Ferrall*
David Kedrowski*
James Rooney*
Thomas Murray
John Plewa
John Shabaz*
Tommy Thompson*
Delmar De Long*
Joint Legislative Council
Mordecai. Lee
* Ex-Officio
2/79
-------
W| I 17
WISCONSIN
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
All members of the Wisconsin legislature are elected from single
member districts. 33 Senators are elected for 4-year terms from
single member districts. All representatives to the Assembly are
elected biennially.
The Wisconsin Senate has 12 standing committees. The Assembly has
29 standing committees and both houses together have 6 joint commi-
tees and 2 research agencies known as joint survey committees. The
Committee on Finance in each house together constitute the Joint Com-
mittee on Finance, and the Committee for Review of Administrative
Rules in each house together constitute the Joint Committee. Standing
Committees hold public hearings on the measures introduced in the
legislature.
The progress of a bill through the Wisconsin Legislature begins with
the introduction of a. bill by one or more authors and possibly co-
sponsors, or by a legislative committee. A bill can be introduced in
either house of the legislature by members of that house with co-
sponsors from the other house, but sometimes identical bills are intro-
duced in both houses.
On a routine basis the members of the Wisconsin Legislature are sup-
plies with certain factual information regarding every measure intro-
duced. Fiscal estimates put a price tag on legislation - every mea-
sure which increases or decreases state or local government revenues
or expeditures must be accompanied by a reliable estimate of its
short-range and long-range fiscal effects. Most of the fiscal esti-
mates are prepared by a joint survey committee of legislators and
others who evaluate not only the fiscal effect, its legality and its
desirability. All bills fearing fiscal estimates must be referred to
the Joint Committee on Finance before they can be enacted into law.
After introduction, each bill proposal is referred to a standing
committee for review. The standing committee may schedule and hold a.
hearing on the proposal. The committee then decides whether to return
the proposal to the house of origin with a favorable or adverse recom-
mendation or recommend the bill in an amended form. After 21 days,
any proposal that has not been reported out of an Assembly committee
may be withdrawn by majority vote, of, if within 21 days, by a two-
thirds vote. In the Senate, a proposal may be withdrawn from commit-
tee at any time by majority vote.
Both houses of the Wisconsin Legislature have adopted a procedure for
systematic calendar scheduling of proposals. In the Senate, all pro-
posals reported by standing committees are referred to the Committee
on Senate Organization; in the Assembly, they are referred to the
2/79
-------
Wl I 18
Committee on Rules. These two committees schedule all business for
floor debate. When a bill is reached on the calendar and given a
second reading, amendments to the bill may be considered. Amendments
to a bill may be offered at any time prior to engrossment. The rules
of both houses require rescheduling of the proposal after engrossment.
Second and third reading of a proposed bill can occur on the same
legislative days. After third reading, the question becomes: "Shall
the bill pass?" upon which time the bill can again be debated. The
bill may be passed by voice vote or by roll call.
If the bill passes, it is messaged to the other house, where it goes
through the same procedure. However, the bill is often referred
directly to the calendar instead of to a standing committee. If the
bill is concurred by the second house, it is messaged back to the
house of origin. When both houses agree on the identical bill and
amendments, the Legislative Reference Bureau enrolls it for the house
of origin, the official copy is signed by the chief clerks of the
houses and by the speaker if an Assembly bill, and the bill is sent
to the Governor. The Governor has 6 days, in which to approve or
veto a bill. He can either 1) sign a bill, in which case it becomes
a law; 2) fail to sign it within 6 days, whereby - if the legislature
is still in session - it would become law; 3) veto it in whole or, if
an appropriation bill, in part; or 4) if the legislature has adjourned
sine die, fail to sign it, thus killing the bill (so-called pocket
veto).
2/79
-------
Wl I 19
WISCONSIN COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION (608) 266-1741
Wilson Street State Office Building
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary of Administration Robert H. Dunn
Deputy Secretary Rebecca C. Young
State Planning and Energy Stephen M. Born, Director
Responsible for carrying out broad statutory authority for the coordination
and improvement of services provided to state agencies. Provides management
services and assistance to state agencies. Facilitates planning by governor
and legislature. Analyzes administrative and fiscal problems and recommends
solutions.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (608) 266-7100
801 W. Badger Road
Madison, WI
Secretary of Agriculture Gary E. Rohde
Deputy Secretary Arthur R. Kurtz -7102
Primary responsibilities are for food and trade regulation, animal disease and
plant pesticide eradication and marketing services. Animal disease and plant
pest eradication includes inspection, survey , laboratory services, regulation
and quarantine procedures.. Consumer inspection is emphasized in meat inspec-
tion, pesticide residue surveillance, development of administrative
designed to protect the home owner and new programs to stop deceptive labeling
and improper packaging practices.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT (608) 266-3222
Suite 650
123 W. Washington Avenue
Madison, WI 53702.
Secretary of Business Dev. Jean C. Broeren
Deputy Secretary
Purpose is to foster the state's economy, as it relates to both industrial
development and tourism, through research, planning and promotion. Provides
assistance to commercial, industrial and recreational developers and to small
and minority enterprises.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES (608) 266-3681
Wilson Street State Office Building
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary of Health and Social Services Manuel Carballo
Deputy Secretary James A. Krauskopf
Division of Health -1514
Health Policy and Planning Ralph L. Andreano -7358
2/79
-------
Wl I 20
WI AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS cont'd
GREAT LAKES COMPACT COMMISSION (608) 266-1221
Department of Justice
Room 114 East
State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702
Executive Director Col. Leonard J. Goodsell
Wisconsin members on the Great Lakes Commission, represent the state's
interest in carrying out the purposes and functions by the interstate
agency. Commission functions in areas of environmental quality control,
shoreline use and recreation, Seaway system navigation and commerce,
fisheries and wildlife, fresh water resources, etc.
INTERSTATE PORT AUTHORITY COMMISSION (608) 266-0262
Room 404 West
State Capitol
Madison 53702
Members:
Senator Daniel Theno, Wisconsin Chairperson
Representative Thomas B. Murray
Eileen Mershart
Gilbert Erickson
James Sauter
Commission directed to develop a plan for the merger of the port authorities
at Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin.
DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT (608) 266-1018
123 West Washington Avenue
Madison, IL 53702
Secretary William R. Bechtel
Deputy Secretary Larry J. Brown -7355
Assists governor in coordinating activities of all state programs having an
impact on community problems and plans.
MINNESOTA-W SCONSIN BOUNDARY AREA COMMISSION (612)436-7131
(715) 386-9444
Joint effort by Wisconsin and Minnesota to conduct studies and develop
recommendations relating to present and future protection, use and develo-
opment in the public interest, of the lands, river valleys and waters which
for the boundary between the states.
2/79
-------
Wl I 21
WI AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS cont'd
MISSISSIPPI RIVER PARKWAY PLANNING COMMISSION (608) 266-7744
Office of INfonnation
Department of Transportation
Hill Farms State Office Building
Madison 53702
Coordinates program for development of the Great River Road in. Wisconsin and
cooperates with similar committees in other states and. Canadian provinces
to develop the road from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (608) 266-2001
432 Hill Farms State Office Building
Madison 53702
Chairperson: Charles Cicchetti
Members: Matthew Holden, Jr.
John. C. Oestreicher
Responsible for regulation of public utilities, including those municipally
owned and operated; railroads and motor carriers.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE . (608) 266-1611
General Executive Facility I
201 East Washington Avenue
Madison 53702
Secretary of Revenue Dennis J. Conta
Deputy Secretary
Administers all state tax laws, determines equalized value of taxable property,
assists local governments in assessments of property, provides auditing and
related accounting services to local units of government upon request.
SOLID WASTE RECYCLING AUTHORITY (608) 266-2686
3321 West Beltline Highway
Madison 53713
Executive Director J. R. Castner
Implements and develops solid waste disposal and recycling facilities.
Authorized to acquire, construct and operate public solid waste recycling
facilities; coordinates all solid waste recycling activities within each
region, etc.
UPPER_GREAT LAKES REGIONAL COMMISSION (608) 266-7532
123 W. Washington Ave., 9th floor (202) 377-2845
Madison 53702
Federal-state-local partnership designed to serve local communities in
northern and central Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan with economic
development problems. Initiates technical assistance and supplemental
grant projects.
2/79
-------
Wl I 22
WI AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
Geological and Natural History Survey, Wisconsin (608) 262-1705
1815 University Avenue
Madison 53706
State Geologist Meredith E. Ostrom
Inventory, investigate and analyze Wisconsin's land, water and other natural
resources. Nine program units: mineral resources and mining, environmental
geology, geophysics/geochemistry, water resources, soils, climatology,
education and information, topographic mapping and biology.
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
Soil and Water Conservation Districts Board (608) 262-2634
Supervises and coordinates efforts of the soil and water conservation districts
in Wisconsin in conserving the soil and water resources of the state, approves
federally assisted watershed development programs and administers state funds
to districts.
2/79
-------
WI II 1
> 1
S 5
w ft
HI ^ Si
ov
"S""
§313
eri tj a I*
3#£ S
o
0.
LU
oc
(0
,3
S
o 2 tf" »* «» * 3 o o o
fill U « I- !a
i§s r
5s 3 I
it s
*
'S. Ti
u£ 2
2a3
3 g a .
||;:
u-9
|^.
J I
oc
o
o
oc
li
o o
ll
!r
4 M
".a u3£
I
g 3
5 3
J I
is ss
SS
§£
i c
_u
oc
o
u.
e
I
o
u
cc
a
o
oc
a.
<
I
i
S 3
3 t^ « a
31SN^
04 3 "5 T3
g|2^
I i
1. .a
u < O 4J o ci
sl 23 s;
-3 3« 8«
! ll
** S iJ K
« -T
5 > 5-
1^ 24 I
X o *3 "
Is H 3
r if 2
« >cS w
S J-3J«
O « uj u M
i \
? =>*!' a?
35!
r3
3-"\
§asi
30 vj c_, a
^5^3i
-------
KEY *
G = Guidance
D = Draft
C = Reg. Comments
Date
USEPA - REGION V
GRANT STATUS REPORTS *
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - Part III
May 1980
III 1
State
WISCONSIN
F - Final
A = Award
E = Evaluation
Jan
AIR POLLUTION Planned
CONTROL Actual
(Section lOi) Comments
SOLID WASTE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
Comments
HAZARDOUS Planned
WASTE Actual
MANAGEMENT Comments
i
WATER Planned
POLLUTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
(Section 106)
PUBLIC Planned
WATER Actual
SUPERVISION Comments'
UNDERGROUND Planned
INJECTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
STATE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
(Section 205g)
WATER Planned
QUALITY Actual
PLANNING Comments
(Section 208)
Feb
Mar
^pr
Hay
G
G
June
July
n
D
Aug
C
Sept
F
Oct
A
C,F
Nov
-ct
CJ t-l
e «
C 3
r-i O
Dec $ P" $<
A
G
E
D
D
C
F
C
A
F
A
32
G
L
D
D
C
F
C
A
F
A
i .
44
E
G
D/C
F
A
FY 80 Allocation $1,380,000
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - $751 ,200
G
D
C
F
A
1
FY 81 Allotment - $47,200
C
r Y / ? c r* c n
j
Award pro_
CT C"
- app ic2t[:
jccroi for .
i E
1
t! .6M
,n for 3 !,£' has beer, ,-scs yed .
5/20
G
A
'!
I
* Indicate KEY letters for each grant. Utilize all KEY letters on "Planned" line
2/79 and, as steps are completed, indicate key letters on "Actual" line.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT (Part III SIS) State Wisconsin
AIR PROGRAMS BRANCH - EPA REGION V Month April. 1980
I.
SANCTIONAELE SIPS
CRITERIA
POLLUTANTS
Primary TSP (Sec
Major Approvabili
Major Approvabili
03/CO/NQ?
Major Approvabili
APPROVA3ILITY
ISSUES
mdary TSP extension request proposal
ANTICIPATED RESOLUTION
NATURE DAT"
n 7/6/79 PR)
;y Issues: None
ty Issues: None
ty Issues: .None
-
II. STATIC:rZiT SOURCE PERMITS
PSD
coMPLin r .»: r ETERMINATIONS
NUM3Z?. COMPLETE
THIS MCirTH
2
NUMBER
OVERDUE
0
FINAL DETERMINATIONS
YEAR
TO
DATE
2
THIS
MONTH
0
INCOMPLETE: g
IN-HOUSE FOR:
UP TO
120 DAYS
0
0
120 TO
ISO DAYS
2*
0
OVER 6
MONTHS
3*
0
III. DELEGATIONS ACCOMPLISHED THIS MONTH: PSD - partial delegation request
2/79 * Application on inactive status pending additional information.
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS III 3
Part III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT State WISCQNSIN-
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V Month MAY 1980
I. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Status of State Efforts to Prepare for Open Dump Inventory (narrative)
Inventory priorities are being set, staff trained; inspections and
determinations have begun this Spring.
B. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Regions
Completed March 27, 1978.
C. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Agency
(bmpleted March 27, 1978.
II. HAZARDOUS t/ASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Has state expressed intention to seek authorization to operate the
program? X Yes No Comments: Expressed February 14. 1979.
B. Does legislative authority exist for the program? X Yes No
If no, comment:
C. ' Status of state regulations development; Regulations tied directly
to promulgation of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
III. STATUS OF URBAN RESOURCE RECOVERY GRANTS
Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling AuthorityRegion II (Wausau-Stevens Pt.)
grant awarded August 20, 1979.
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (narrative) ^'sconsin has no State noise control
program, (cont'd.)
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (narrative) All of the Region V State
Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) have to be reviewed (cont'd.]
2/79
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATE WISCONSIN
PART III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT MONTH MAY
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V -
s-'
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (.cont'd.) ^
We are supporting an ECHO (Each Community Helps Others) program in West -
ATMs. The recipients are Madison and Waukesha County. We are also
providing technical assistance, equipment loan, and training.
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (cont'd.)
again using the Federal Emergency Management Administration's (FEMA)
revised criteria. The Wisconsin RERP is currently under review and a
State visit was made on April 17 to discuss the review results with the
State.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - III
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PESTICIDES BRANCH - EPA V
State l/fl
Month
III 4
April
19SO
I. ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT:
Status of Grant Grant awarded 9/22/79
Amount of Grant $151,559
Enforcement
Activities
Use Inspections
Producer Establishments
Inspected
Producer Establishment
Samples Collected
Marketplace Samples
Collected
Import
Investigations
Civil Complaints
Notices of Arrival
Reviewed
Import Detentions
Stop Sale, Use or
Removal Orders
Criminal Referrals
Recalls Initiated
EPA
This
Month1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
Year L
Comn-
to 1.
na,0 iitinerd
0
2
2
1
0
0
22
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
STATE
This
Month
0
1
2
0
Xear
to
_Date
8
2
3
0
Commi-
:raent
139
35
60
90
TOTAL
This
Month
0
1
2
0
Year u _
to Tirl-
Dai-o £.._=_-
8 139'
4 35
5 60
1 90
II. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
Amount of Grant $35,000 (proposed) Mid-Year Evaluation conducted 4/17/80
Status of Training Program Activity: 2 phase 1 session - 25 trained
3 phase 2 sessions - 111 trained
III Quantify and describe indicators of health problems reported as result of
pesticides misuse during month: none
IV. Special local Meed Requests Received: none rec'd in April; 1 rec'd year to date
2/79
-------
SPA - 3EGI3SJ V
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
;?ATER - PART III
"IT *""*
1,1:5
III 5
STATE Wisconsin
DATE May 5, 1930
Page 1 of 3 Page (3)
SCHEDULE
PROJECT NA'4E ORi:
(list)
"CURRENT
DELAY
Recent Cumulative
(weeks) (TIOS)
REASON FOR OEL^Y
(Recent/Cumulative)
Maiison
F 11/77 3/30
33
ilwaukee
0 9/77
3/30
10/30
37
Lake Geneva
D 5/79
5/31
24
Cu-nulative-On going review
of technical issues at
OMR. Awaiting infoc-
nation fcoTi State and
grantee. Mso, *\WT
review will be necessary.
Allowances Tiade for '/TO^R
ani inhouse review.
Additional Step 1 work
required to address
DEIS and WCNR questions.
Delay in initating
the additional work.
Cumu1ative-De1ays attri-
buted to combining of
Comprehensive and C30
513's, and resultant
contract 'nodifications.
Delays in completion
of Facilities Plan.
Cumulative-Continued
delay of facilities
planning information.
The amendment request
awaiting .OMR review.
Facilities Planning
consultant falling
behind on starting
on volume 2 of F.P.
Grantee's consultant's
delay in developing
facilities olan.
- Draft
- Final
Recent - Delays since orevious reoort
-------
Ill 5
EPA - RS3IOM 7
REGO1AL PROGR\:4 STATUS REPORT
rtATER - PART III
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
313
STATE Wisconsin
DATE ^lay 5, 1930
page 2 Of 3 page(s)
SCHEDULE
ORIG
DELAY
CURRENTT
(list)
RECENT
(weeks)
:UB1ULATIVE
(mos)
REASON FOR DELAY
(Recent/Cumulative
St. Croix
Falls/Taylors
Falls
0 9/79
7/80
10
Portage
F 1/79
5/80
16
Facilities Planning
consultant experienc-
ing problems in
raceiving funds.
Cirnu 1 a t iva- c on t inuei
dalay of facilities plan-
ning information. Due
to facilities planners
not developing
alternatives. This
is a piggyback
El3. The Schedule
is tied to the
facilities plan. Four
month delay due to
Facilities Planners not
developing alternatives.
Everything is reason-
ably on time.
Racent- Contractor slow
progress in completing
final product.
Cumulative-Meed to com-
plete site specific
facilities planning
work. Delays in
printing. Additional
analysis necessary
to find a new site
that does not have
wetlands. Additional
- Draft
? - Final
Recent - Delays submitted to EPA since previous report
-------
III 5
EPA - REGION V
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
III
SIS
3TATE
DATE
page
Wisconsin
:iay 5,
3 of 3
1930
page(s)
PROJECT
(list)
SCHEDULE
QRIG
DEIAY
FOR OSIAY
CURRENT
RECENT
(weeks)
CCT-FJIATWE
( Recant /Cumulative
Gibraltar
[Dooc County)
D 1/80
9/80
analysis on watlands
& PC3's is necessary.
Delays in obtaining
EIS contract ani
revisions to con-
tract and additional
data needs to resolve
land application
issues.
Qrnulative-Further facili-
ties planning delay.
Setback resulting froii
delay in submission
of facilities plan by
consultants.
'.tote: The facilities plan-
ners are going to finish tn^
facilities plan and have
the public hearing with no
further El3 coordination.
This usans that we no longer
are doiig a concurrent SIS
and all work on the 513 is
delayed until after the
facilities plan is COTI-
oletad.
- Draft
F - Final
Recent - Delays submitted to EP^ since orevious reoort
-------
USEPA - REGION V
V7ATER - SIS PART III
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT FOPJM
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
III 7
State Wisconsin
I. . 208
Month May
1980
208 Agencies
(list)
Wisconsin DNP,
FVKQPA
DCRPC
WDNR
SEWEFC
DCPPC
FvTvQPA
WDNR
VvDNR
Status of (For example, has the plan been certified?
208 Plan approval granted by EPA? dollars amount of
ongoing grant? general scope of effort?
outstanding issues? If in house, when will
review be corrpleted? Is anyone holding UD reviev?
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $312,250
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $257,000
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $ 42,167
FY 80 Section 208 Grant Award: $ 54,189
On April 4 water quality management plans reviewed and submitted
for approval:
Manitowoc River Basin
Buf f alo-Trernpaaleau River Basin
Upper Wisconsin River Basin (Non-Point Elements only)
Rock River Basin (Kon-Point Source elements only)
Plan reviewed and submitted for approval.
Plan approved.
Plan elements for NPS reviewed and submitted for approval.
Lower Manitowoc Priority Watershed Plan prepared and selected
for funding under the USDA "RC-7P" program. (Lower iManitowoc
is part of the Manitowoc River WOM Plan.
. USEPA awarded $250,000 to the WDNR to study Phosphorus and
water quality standards as was agreed to in the FY 79 SEA.
l
l
II. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Describe state activity related to standards revision, time-frame, and
regional strategy being pursued:
WDNR has begun working on developing a new classification system and new
guidance for clcissifyinT lev flcr-' :- ure,--3 in ":; scor..~ari.
2/79
-------
Gt/c
s *
^5*
1 ,
_^ o"
o" o
rt- 0
> 1
^ ""^
OJ rt
Oi 3
CT rh
1
rc is
o>
Q.
ro
£
n
0
Q.
fO
(D
3
QJ
<-h
^
O-
3
^
(D
t/>
-^
n
t-h
0)
t
T
0
T
O
^,
d
V.
n
o
K
-1
^V
§
PI
3
r;
"^
^j
:o
>
-h
3-
D
-s
-1-
-ti
O
-s
**i"
3"
_J.
s>
3
O
Q
-s
~*
3
y
U
/}
3
'
T>
T)
3
OT '**.
r- ':;i
i '
CO
O
O
*
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
0
-3 ' ' ~
ii .' " r
S
,w
CO
o
o
*
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
55
0
lr. I-'.
o
r-. -J
ro
-j
UD
cn
4
ro
*
o
0
o
.0
o
0
o
o
1 '
1 '
OJ
en
00
CO
8 &
» c
O 7-
w
n < c
c: <~> '-
s: o
K t"
rr ^»
~ 3
CO
<: ;?
j 4 C
0 C
r- tr
> P
H S
O
CO 1
H <
CO f
X "-
§ §
H c/
-~
o a
s^ i <
H CO
M
PI
W W
H M
PI O
is
H CO
"~
<
3 PI
m ^
o
o ^s
n "
O R
>-J ?3
^
^* '-J
O
-) »
r)
o
en
H
«_j
Pi
5
H
O
« H
) >
> f
i E |
n 3
M tn
S 53
H
o a
C*3 O
; o ^<
- O M
^ t^ *
3 " 73
1 1-H
3 H PI
33d
i -z.
H
: 55 2
3 2 H
> rn 53
3 o c:
> n\ n
IJ
0
2
i
^
C-
^-^
c
c.
c
tn
|
o
01
P
c
en
ro
h~
en
on
^j
n
o
H
O
CO
c/;
S
;,
O
»
^-i
C
5
?*
Q
^T"
r"~
52
r^*
pc
0
^
> g
w n
S 5
^5 ^
o
0 ~j
E5 ^
M S
I-J
§ 3
-^ 5C
G "^
1 "-3
a
pi -(
T3 ft
^>
JO
ri co
O CO
^
co
a
rr
a
Oi
n
o
U)
=3
5"
3
3-
1=
-3
~J.
'
K->
CO
O
3 III
-------
n
o
1
z ? 5
i-1 H 3
cn pi ca
50 pi
E~ o
cn ti
n > cn
rS" " "°
?, as
fD on
z
c
2
33
PI
73
O
o
f
cn
-3
n M§ P
Oi a
to 5
N
o" i
a
f
n
H
O
cn
z
G
p}
?o
>,
2
0
H
n
°
,
cn
H
O
3
o
T
^
CJ
C/l
§
6
|
g
H
t ^ ^
. '~" -.
^ fD
O -h
ff>
> -i.
rfr O
r
C
;
n
<<
+ n>
3
5 O
3 -h
i
o'
_^
I 00 73 B)
oo a o <*
^^ ^^ j
i i
a 0
3
1
000
O
ro
-5
-s
O>
^^
to
rh
O
O
O
EU
to
cn
c
Oi
-s
Q.
^ ^
OO
fO
n
c-h
O
3
v**J
^^^
'
,
q
o
z
cn
O
<
.j.
'
5:3
O
ri-
o'
3
1
O
*
M
3
m
O
§
flj
H-
O
3
MI
i-t
0
3
to
0}
rr
to
0
p"
r*
ft
11
h-
<
25
O
3
n
o
3
"3
i
a
n
o
73
ro
-3
o
rr
Fl
<
d>
t *
C
U
rr
O
3
*
Tl
O
i-T
3
M
fD
3
O
n
o
3
3
r»
y
O
rr
O
3
CO
rr
3>
?T
3
U
33
V
h*-
3
cn
rr
cn
i-j
Q
Q.
C
(D
01
3
C*
-^
H-
3
C3
H*
O
Mi
(--
(5
3
rr
<
O
I-1
Oi
o
0 Z
M O
cn Z
Cl I
> c
53 Z
O rt
pi r:
73 i i
cn ^3
c-
CT>
O
1
C
00
ro
cn
o 2:
i-i e
cn 2
O 1-1
p> i-<
73 -d
o >
pi r-
^
cn
CO
O
^J
O
io
i
'
cn
O
PI O Z
-=1 73 O
53 r*i
73 7=
£ o o
PI O Z
oi 1 §
1 0^ ^
^
^j
CO
o"
CO
o
OO
on
o z
'n g O
° 1J =
P! 0 0
° i 1
P o° o
£
cn
cn
o"^
ji
o
H M cn p:
o s o 5
H PI G t_
> Z 73 O
t- H 0 53
»-i PI
PI
O
J-l
G P) O
Z M f
M Z >
i-i > H
cn t- M
O
cn <
n w
« o
PI r-
a >
f M
PI Z
cn c~>
< pi ") >
HI MI M n
0 -=1 Z rt
r .- > 3
> G t- >
CD Z
H
cn
< cn >
I-H n O
0 3 >-i
f PI G
> a >
H e f
o p<
cn
< Pi "1
1 1 ^ M
0 t) z
r1 f >
> G r"
i-i PI
i-i Z
O i-J
z
cn
S n
r* pi
> c
H G
O P!
z
cn
3 3 > T|
O G n PI
Z 73 i-i C
H M I-l PI
= si?
cn c-
3> *!
n p:
H o
o°c5
O z >
cn p-
»<
CO
o
o
2
^M
1
H
CO
> "1
O X
o
IS
r* 1-1
-i O
cn
H 5
2 P]
w
*
* "
* B
pi
PJ
z
c
r.
PJ
3
PI
z
I-i
n
H
o
z
cn
p;
c
p;
>
n
TIONS
2 o" o M
C3 t rr Z
B O U
" u. 0
TJ P Wi ^
pi cn r*
n ^ i-1 >
PI * 1 Z
Z * 0
H PI
cn
H
H
P!
PI
-3
**
z
5
PI
pa
o
^
z
a:
*o
o
o
cn
0
p)
cn
H
a
PI
cn
O
53
n
z
H
(n
O
73
H
Z f"^
o «
to
o
o
T3
-S
OT III
-------
OT III
Issued
Rema i n
Modif i
ro -
Q_ 3 '
to -n
*-"»» -<^
T1 **~*+
-< Tl '
-< 10
i £Q
LO ' £"**>
co in-
O CO
> o
1X3
1X3 -p. 1X5
ro -P>
CO £» CO
0 ' 0
~
r~
o
i
,2
c:
o
i=
i
rr
o
m
73
\
°" ~"Sr«
<<3|
S5|
CU -SJ5
i * m en
~ \ u
ro o.
O
-.. 0T1
3 ^H
rl- 30
£»>*
__ . l^J
ro c. ij"j
i * \ ^^
j« Q ^ j
-5 -5fe
rt-aH
0 Cu
X T3Q
_.. (TjO
0 TZ
cn 32
c -iO
rf J*"*
~ "
(/) 1
rl- ts>*0
O) &
3 SO
O -J-CTJ
ro rtjjs
O S
O CT"
3 '
rt" ro/"-\
-S 0>3
O OtB
' 3Tt
-J.I1
ro 3Ca
h to rt
-h H-
O 0<
-5 -sro
rl" ^-^
o
**?
el-
s' G"3
ro o
-s o
O-
-o
O Cu
rt- 0-
ro <
3 0)
rt- 3
-> o
cu ro
ro
rt- 3
0 rt
X
O 3
CU
3 -O
rt- -5
O
T3 tQ
-s -s
o ai
cr 3
ro 3~
3 cu
to to
f^
w
ro
co ro
O 3
ro o
n
-Q O
c c
ro -s
to -5
rl- -"
_j, -^
O tQ
3
Cu
to -o
-5
i *- (Tl
Ci ^-*
0 0
ro
cr (/>
Cu to
n
TT ro
<
tr> cu
-" C
O_ QJ
^. ( f-r
3 -"
UD 0
3
~° * r«
"S 3 W
0 0_£3
"2 S
-S -"'P
1 rfw
3
2
o> cu O
to to Tl
CT3T>
i^S
^ ^~ ^ -
-a crM
!±3!5
O O M
"=l
_.. 0 g
3 Hz
ro O'H
-S Q.13
i 5=3
<< O O
23P
CU P0>
"< 1 S
(X3--
<0
1 x^v
o cos
c ota
cr - I
i n
_. (a
O 3>rr
'H*
0 <
o ro
3 "o v^
ro o
3 CT 73
rt* ^^ ro
st ro t)
3 ro
rt- to '
O <
cu ro
D_-O O-
CU T3
rt- ro rl-
ro cu 3"
-s ro
O) -".
n to ro
30-5
rt- ' CU
< rt-
ro ro
a.
-a
-5
ro
c: ri-
3 -5
> ro
ro cu
(/i g-
V) 3
ro
3" 3
ro rt-
Ol
-s -a
llrjt ^
3 O
tQ tQ
-s
_i. Cu
01 3
-< _J.
i
ro 3
_O
"1 1
-:s' ol
ro i
Q. C-.
v Cu
3
ro c
X Cu
"O "3
ro <<
o
rt-
STATU
FACIL
H en
H
MS 0
Tl
*d
M O
?3 PJ
LEGATION i
MIT PROGR-
V 0
S Tl
Tl
/» PJ
3 0
(B W
H pa
H >
BI r*
rt
H-
<
ro
x^
2: 3=>
0 C
< rt-
ro 3"
3 o
O" ~5
ro -"
~l rt
*<
ro
cn rt
- o
iO to
~~J (/>
to c
ro
T3
ro
-s
~J*
rt-
to
rt
O
Tl
ro
Q-
ro
-s
Cu
-h
Cu
O
i
«j*
rt-
ro
to
Q-
ro
ro
IQ
o>
rt-
ro
Q.
o
3
NON-
MUNIC
H
*0
>
r1
cn
o
cn
o
o
i
-n
m
3> 0
z m
a po
3=
3 1
* '
"Z. "^
O >
73 C-.
O
73
-^1
1
O
o
S
s~* G
*TJ Z
O M
H n
SC M
- TI
CO >
>-» f
CO
o
--J
~>1
CO
o
-" O
to 3
01 ro
c
ro ro
a. x
tj
3 ~S
ro
3 CL
o>
<< T3
ro
i -j.
S rt-
o
s
-a cu
ro to
3 ~a
J« r*
rt- cr
to *
CU O
-s
ro 3
o
C rt
Q, r>
ro a>
-i a.
ro cu
3 3
-h 0-
0 -
T S
O -i.
i z;
ro
3 cr
<-+ ro
Tl 2
R C
1-
en
TOTAL
MAJOR
SOURCES
IDENTIFIED
Tl C=l M Z
M Tl cn C
pa T) cn S
S w a as
M o ra PJ
H H O JO
en M
< >
M Z
O
PI Z Tl Z
Tl O PJ G
TJ H pa 2
w 2 a
O M PJ
H H JS
M cn
<3 O
PJ Tl
pa cn »* Z
Tl M C
T) Z PJ 2
O O Tl W
pa pi Ti PI
H PJ ?o
r4 o
> H M
cn 1-1 en
H < en
PJ G
PJ
O
o
0
w
z
H
cn
§
25
O
Z
1
H~l
CO
cn
1
n
PJ
cn
Z M *d
T3 Z W
cn ?a M
o H
>TJ PJ
33 S
§z 5
w H 52
» s
D FJ
o
3
CO
M
en
ICO
o
o
o
3
CO
o
-------
Organics Regulations State Region-wide
Water
Division
Branch Water Supply
Date May 7, 1980
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form;
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERSr-all publics concerned or involved with the'issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update rn this issue.
Summary of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic organic
contamination of industrial origin. Sixty-two indicator organic materials were named
as being possibly associated with such contamination, and granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment was proposed as the best available means of removing .these contaminants
from drinking water. Design criteria were designated for the GAC treatment. A simul-
taneous proposal was made to limit trihalomethane contamination to 10 ppb in drinking
water. Such contamination develops as a result of reactions between the treatment
chemical, chlorine, and naturally present organics.
ckground:
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No laboratories
have been certified for the necessary organic analyses. Laboratory methods have
not been established beyond the research laboratory to give the sensitivity impor-
tant to drinking water analyses. The trihalomethane (TTHM) regulation appears to
be of small importance to Region V, in that no large systems to which the proposal
was limited have been shown to have high TTHM levels present.
Perception on Issues:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be familiar with the
tests required and should be confident in the results of such tests. Lacking standard-
ized methods and certified laboratories, the only dependable source for such information
would appear to be highly specialized laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Water Supply Branch has determined to carry out a
study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems most likely to be affected by
industrial contamination.
Involved Characters:
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Update:
now lags 2 months on preparation of certification guidelines for trihalomethane
. This is now becoming a; critical issue with Ohio EPA especially concerned
about our credibility and their cooperative stance. The treatment effects specialist
has begun gathering data for early TTHM investigative work in Indiana and Ohio.
-------
State. 2_
Enforcement
Divson
* ^;~ 'T"'i '
:. ration ' -''" '
Dace
USEPA-REGIGN V - ^J^^
Instr uc tions
...._---...
Please use the following f one at to summer i~e special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUED, a section, providing the EACKGJROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the X^Z2HM
CAST_ QF^ CHARACTERS all public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
Jected~RESOLUTldN of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or psrc"aptions~ch~ar.gs, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
_l_ss_jc - 1. States are having moderate to severe resource problems in establishing
their ";PDF_S pretreat'ient programs. 2. The Region, has a very tight schedule in 'che
Srate pretreat :enr program del cget ion process,
_Bdc^grojjnd - TPA's oretreat -lent. rag1.; lotions (June 1973) require all iVPCFS Spates to
establisn and iriplen.ent a p;-et reagent prcoruji. 'Jnere State legal authority exist.:;,
they were to apply to operate the pretreatrnent pregrai by ilarch 27, 1979. If auchor-
ity is not in place, i:he State has up to March 1930 to apply- 1-,'hile preliminary steps
could be taken, the magnitude of the Drogra.n for larger States is ths major is"i;e,
E general, done a;, outs ton:^ ng job o~ laying
out and scai-t^rg to gea:" up and -ie/e :,he pro-yc'i, he,/ever, full i'^pl e i.ontc :i ui of
L"/en a .ni.TMTUTi prezr e;t;nont jjrogrc.;-; -nil severely t>';< tlva States' scarring level, 'A~
rire raced with this najor issue i/.;1/ because oi; tiie rarcri /7 lc/9, rr,]u'I atory r^po1"'; i ug
require nents of eoi'Tntti >,g futu'e resource: by tiie States.
The pretreai:T;ent -egt'l at ^ois :;low :.'-\^ tO-days to rule en a State's apo! i cation, wh^eh
includes publication in the gg2de_raj ReoiGtrv ana sowe 2iJ!--dOG r.e-;spapers, along with
a 15-day public cc'ruv-em; period T ;;ee"tfng"The tire renui recent, pariicul ar!y cbtaining
tvnely Headquarters '"or:currenee, v, i! i rec;uire spec i a1 handling anJ close socoe^a tin-,.
Proposed cnanges 1:1 the regulations w'll reouce the public co;n;nent oeri^d to SO ,137-;,
Resent Heajguayre.-s rewora wiun res'1 c~> :ts Xejrons tc Go cays total to process acec:ec-
l:l'/9-Litci_^AiLJ:iL^Jll^clCLJ>
-------
State
REGION WIDE IV 2
Division Air & Hazardous Ma ten'a"
Branch
Date
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Pesticide
4/4/79
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following format to suzsiarise.special problems requiring attention:
Include a. description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Issue:
Background:
Cast of
Characters
Pesticide Enforcement Agreement outputs
The 1978 FIFRA Amendments gave the states enforcement primacy (Sec. 26]
as of this date, three states (Michigan, Minnesota and Indiana with
Enforcement Agreement/Grants) have automatic use primacy.
Illinois and Wisconsin have also been granted primacy pursuant to an
effective Sec. 4 applicator certification plan. Ohio has indicated
that state cooperation with the Administrator's Emergency Suspension
Order of 2/28/79 (2,4,5-T and Silvex) would be extremely limited.
Consequently, the Agency is presently considering denying use primacy
to Ohio because of this reluctance to cooperate. This matter must
be resolved as soon as possible.
Illinois - Dwight Dunbar, Chief, Bureau of Plant & Apiary Protection
Illinois Dept. of Agriculture
Indiana - L. 0. Nelson, Pesticide Administrator, Office of
Indiana State Chemist
Michigan - Dean Lovitt, Chief, Plant Industry Division, Michigan
Department of Agriculture
Minnesota - Tom McConnell, Acting Director, Agronomy Services,
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Ohio - Oren Spilker, Specialist in Charge, Pesticide Regulation,
Ohio Department of Agriculture
Wisconsin- William Simmons, Chief, Bureau of Special Services,
Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
f/79
-------
IV
S tate Wis cons in
Division Water
Branch Water Quality Management
Date April 3, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
ISSUE: The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Comnission is recaimending in
their Water Quality Management Plan that 18 public sewage treatment facil-
ities within their region rsnove phosphorus so as to achieve an effluent
phosphorus level of 0.1 mg/1. These 18 facilities have a combined capacity
of 70 mgd.
BACKGROUND
The problems perceived by the public, the U.S. EPA and the Wisconsin DNR with
these recommendations are:
1) It has not been totally proven that a public treatment plant can reach an
effluent discharge level of 0.1 mg/1 of phosphorus for a monthly average.
There are plants that have been reaching these levels of treatment but most
are experimental in nature and the results have not been conclusive. There
is also some question as to the efficacy of the process train. The plan
recommends a two-stayed lime clarification process much like the types used
in water purification systems producing potable public water supplies.
2) The costs involved in implementing the additional treatment units will be
substantially higher than for conventional phosphorus removal. The addi-
tional units will add an estimated $48 million dollars in capital costs
and $4.8 million dollars in annual operation and maintenance costs.
Additionally these costs were computed using 1976 as the base year.
3) The SEWRPC Plan is at considerable variance from what the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources recommends. They are the State water pollution control
agency and they recommend 1.0 mg/1. The International Joint Commission, an
international body established to protect the integrity of the Great Lakes
also recommends 1.0 mg/1 of phosphorus in effluent discharges into the basins
of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan and 0.5 mg/1 into the basins of Lakes
Erie and Ontario.
4) Individuals and organizations also question if the 0.1 mg/1 effluent
limitation will result in in-stream water quality improvements. It
has been pointed out that if influent phosphorus is reduced then a
water body, in re-establishing homeostasis, will begin releasing
phosphorus from the benthos which will mitigate many of the desired
results that the 0.1 mg/1 effluent limitation was designed to achieve.
4/79
-------
IV 5 b
Also, the reduction in available phosphorus should curtail algal blooms,
however, this may facilitate and accelerate the establishment of rooted
macrophytes.
5) The computer model that SEWRPC utilized, HYDROCOMP, has been criticized
in its projections for water quality improvements resulting from limiting
phosphorus in the effluent. Its detractors claim that other models,
namely QUAL III, or the Vollerweider-OECD eutrophication model are more
useful and would give more realistic results.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
The major participants in this issue are:
U.S. EPA, both Region V and Washington B.C. national offices.
Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
The 18 affected, either existing or proposed, treatment plants.
Donahue and Associates, Consulting Engineers.
Various public interest groups.
The residents of the seven counties within the SEWRPC area.
The U.S. EPA, Region V, will have the ultimate responsibility to approve and
oversee the plan implementation. However, if the plan is approved by EPA
and WDNR it becomes binding and will have obvious impacts upon the "201"
Construction Grants Program of U.S. EPA.
The level of phosphorus removal is advanced waste treatment (AWT) which is now
being closely scrutinized by both EPA Headquarters and the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The current trend is to reduce the enormous costs involved
in AWT and each AWT proposal is being screened, on a case by case basis, to
see if it is cost-effective.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources will have to enforce both the
areawide plan and the phosphorus effluent limitations and this may prove to
be very costly, unwieldly and not politically sound.
Donahue and Associates, a Milwaukee based consulting firm, specializes in the
public wastewater treatment plants. They have recently notified all of the
18 communities or sanitary districts that will be affected by the 0.1 mg/1
limitation, and have called upon them to defeat the acceptance and implemen-
tation of the SEWRPC Areawide Water Quality Management plan. At this date
their motives for moving this way are not clear.
The 18 Communities which may be affected are:
1) Brcokfield, City of
2) Burlington, City of
3) Cedarburg, City of
4) Delafield - Hartland Water Pollution Control Commission
5) Dousman, Village of
L/7Q
-------
IV 5 c
6) Dover-Eagle, Town of, lake Sewer Utility District
7) Hartford, City of
8) Jackson, Village of
9) Mukwanago, Village of
10) Norway, Town of, Sanitary District No. 1
11) Oconomowoc, City of
12) Salem, Town of, Sanitary District No. 2
13) Slinger, Village of
14) Union Grove, Village of
15) Walworth County Metropolitan Sewage District
16) Waukesha, City of
17) West Bend, City of
18) Whitewater, City of
There are numerous public interest groups that have strong feelings both for
an against the phosphorus limitations and the general public will have to
hear the additional costs that this effluent limit will generate; $48 million
in additional capital costs and $4.8 million in annual operation and maintenance
costs.
4/79
-------
Division.
Branch
Mav 1979
Date
USEPA-REGION V - OPfiCIAL ISSUES
Ins true tions f or _Cc:ng lat:ion_ _ol ^ _t n ift_ _? crrc
Please use the following format to surcn.?ri2s special prcbleis requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the JL^SjJIib^ a section providing tbe £,ACK_^RpU_irD_
on the problem, issue or perceptions c>~_- ths iscuf:, and a section On the- ibIVjjiA;£jj
CAST OF CHARACTERSall public concerned or involved with the issue. and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. .As nev information davelors, other problem arise ,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly up data on thr'i isr-v.-a.
ISSUE:
As a result of disci: scion1? '"il~h tl-o '.'J dconsin ^KR concerning the I Ml -nub-e bTS i_-j
development of a benrrarcbj n ,-f .' >-, re .Tie n .; with WDMR on lJEPA/bbDA c oofc' !-.-' i f or . f vr,
necessity for a public rearing fol"l_p_:;in^ che release of t. flu
Administrative Ccd3 allows then the option of holding the bbP^ recr.c J.rtn hear L:'-p, in
conjunction with the NE^A nearing on jhe draft LI 3, WbbR h'jj nade a policy d-:.<-.is: en
requiring the hearing after the Final bbS, Given the active public i.ivolv-mcr.t pro?,i:-
for the facilities plan and EIS oroce?:-^ tc :_s dcubtf-j' tha*~ a public: hsarinf per se
will be of itiuch vfl"£. Th _- 30-day p?t:'.->r. 5 :> _ ?. O'--i op, the final bl^ -'bculd b? ,-:u ':f ic cui:
opportunity for public respor.se, The i.-^.y\:\ i^i-iif is so;r:e-'b"^ velvto.c -
that draft and fi>:,ii ETS's ;.iist net he 'i. . u. :uj cjci:;ion :inbb«;; JocvnienL1-
EIS's should only b:- one. :;f che F-cr^c'> us:-d to r^ach a ru»_;'s-; ^ ., ibis
this Region's intr-qrc tic:: of rb- Jc-ci: i ^r .^bcin; aiid blS procss-ioa,
BACKGROUNj):
While VBNR has indicated th^c tbe- w
on other EIS's, it ] paves the >'i]vcub >e .v.j'7> ..n ,1 t. coition jf ,;>vit ui'c ir t:a^ uc1.' sbcus
the conclusion o<" it:; Sier 1 proc,= rS. V.):T\ c ;.--, not wan: Co C«.O--LC itself to fiiix
specific time period for nakia^, t'r^. /_.; .? 11 ic.; p" :.r; c^rrr- VT- I r-c.-i'ic r, f ol.-0'.'i.n^ the
final EIS. They will onl:, ,,.--r^--> L-J> .- ;;b^ rie c';L;^ion ",_.:; ,:;ui':bi- c.r po--.'-i'. i , " ,
Although we can ::c sr rucn-r,? o'
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(1), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual_or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:$151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative enforcement grant is to the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection, to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 & 9 of FIFRA
and (2) upgrade the state envorcement program by increasing laboratory cap-
ability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
The semi-annual review was conducted on April 17, 1980. The report supports
the states' competence in meeting all program commitments provided that state
imposed mileage restrictions do not restrict inspectional activity.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRAf-!T APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Haste Management Branch
Authorizing Section'La';: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery ,flct
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: October 30, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 799,003 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 447,531 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by
Section 3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific
time, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the
program in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature
include: resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and
manifest system development; expansion of surveillance and enforcement programs;
public participation; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS RFPORT - GRANTS AMH/On GP"!r APPLICATIONS
State of l-lisconsin--K'isconsin Solid '-laste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management P.ranch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Population served: 255,000
Brief Description of project or program covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for Lincoln,
Marathon, Port-ije, and Wood Counties (Wausa'.i-Stevens Point area), having a com-
bined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
Feasibility v/ork has been progressing since September 1979. In-house staff has
completed quantity anj composition task. Markets for recycled products are
currently being investigated. An eighteen (18) month initial phase anticipated.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GP/UiTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISIO'!: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: October 30, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 1,261,750 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 370,350 (actual)
(Actual or p
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Wasta Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
State officials have agreed to monthly reporting of grant outputs.
Final group training will be held on March 27 and 28.
MAR 1980
-------
STATU3 RIIPO-T - GRAFTS A.iiy'pP. ';p.AN'i A.;:''.IC.f-.TIONS
State of Wisconiin ,
DIViSICN: /\ir an(j Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
WIDATCP officials have agreed to monthTy reporting.
INSTRUCTIONS:
v%
1. CompTete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
?.. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
FEB 1980
-------
State of
Wisconsin
DIVISICH: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
«
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003(a)(l); Rosour.-s Conse-Cation .ic-d Recovery :-
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) October 30, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Aciuo}_or proposed)
1.251-.750
370,350
Brief description of project or prc'irav covered: This grant is awarued to suppor,
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^'raria, and Jevelcprr.en'c
of Stats Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulat^'jtis ii!£ndat2J by Ssc- '
tion 4CQ2 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirp.^nts in thj reg^U- '
tions In order to remain eligible for funding. These piannirj rpouirciins.its include'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management, accncies at all
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory'aut^r-5 ties ov.^r land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal in;p-2Jirrents to
resource recovei-y; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi ig permits.-
If (STRUCT IONS: ;
1. Coir.plete forms, by State;, for aVI p^ojor: or r'vrin u .ti, &'
or urKfcr consi^deratian, within that Stata (include c; ;,,its to loce c
local uCinciGS, planning agencies, others)
i
2. Do n.0j% include FY 1930 pro'.;r.^ grants or r_.n-,.-".tion yi c; .
3. Treat each supplemental reqviest separately.
-------
\
f.t.«ry.r - i-K-VMa A.TJ/OK PP/V.'
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRAtlCl: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation flrid Recovery A"t of
f . . 197(5 (RCRA) u.
Date of Award: *
i1 (Actual of anticipated), October 30, 1979 i"/
Total Project Cost: * |
(Actual or proposed) 799.903 I
Federal Grant Amount: . i
(Actual or proposed) 447,'531 1
Brief description of project or program-covered: Tl.is gran* is awarded ro -UP- '"
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazcirdou' -var.te nnna-ienvnY !'
program as defined by regulation irandated by Section 3CJ6 of rKCR-r\. in it'»*«s '
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tine, t!ie iJ. S. r.ivlronnianurPro- '
lection Agency will use these fends to operate the program ir that State. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature incite: re-source 'S-.-^srent-
legal and'regulatory developmsnt; permit and manifest system Jc-iVfilopni-ntTeApan-
-sion o, surveillance and enforcement proor^ms; public partic-'jaf on'- :
abandoned site and emergency response proyT-a.ns. ,.
fi"
" * ' ).i'.
i* '
V
i, -
\
"INSTRUCTIONS: ' :
1. Complete forms, by Statev for all project or r^-oara.-n c ;pts, a'.tive {
or under consideration, within that Statu (include grants tr '.Uto ay.'rwi'jj, !:.'
1 ocaT rt|e nc 1 es, p U?i:n ng a genets, others) " f,
I-
2. Po uat include FY 19SO program grants :K c.v.istnirtijn grt.ts. ;
3. Treat oach si:?pUT2ntal
-------
St -a:; c-i ___ Hisconsin __ ...... JAN 5 1330
:: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
Pesticides
Author iziii'j Seci:ic:i/Lav;: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of /"-.-d.-a: 9/27/79
(Actual or er.L
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project cr program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups. /
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.f>. \-i I fV 1 IC/U
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . : '
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4C03(a)(lh K':sourv2 Conse-Cation .ic-d Recovery :-
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: * r
f (Actual or anticipated) October 30, 1979 . .;-.
~ . » I
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) ^.^ . ;
i
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) .370,350
Brief description of project or pra
-------
\
3iMii:> i.trir.i - l-K-vnj AS'J/OR PPAKT-APrLKATIES
State of Wisconsin
. DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
*^r
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/law, section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of '
1976 (RC.1A) h-
Date of Award: . f.
/ (Actual of anticipated) . October 30, 1979 * j.;
Total Project Cost: j
(Actual or proposed) 799-003 '
Federal Grant Amount: j
(Actual or proposed) 447,'531 !
Brief description of project or program-covered: -n,is gran+ 1S awarded to sup- j.
port the eventual development of a fully authorized ii.izc>rdour .vaste nun a.];>'? nc ;
program as defined by regulation: mandated by Section 3J06 of kCRA. in States 1
urable to obtain authorization by a specific time, tlie U. S. rnviror^antdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these frnds to operate the program ir that Stata. Seme
of the activities that are dsvelopnental in nature incite: resourcp. jsirfsspent;
legal and" regulatory development; permit and manifest system Javetopn&nt; e.xpan-
sion of surveillance and enforcc-t.ient progr.?iTis; public particvifcn; ;
abandoned site and emergency response proyTvuis. «».
If*'
'"IHStRUCTIONS: ;
*
1. Complete forms, by Statcv for all project or ivosram c ;nts, a'.-iive j.
or under con's 1 deration^ within t.hot Stat'j (include grants tr '.t^tc ay.'rui'js, j."
Tor a t cigenci cs» pi an:n ng agenc-;ps, otherj) i
» !
2. Do jKi. include FY 19SO program grants or c.v.is true t ion gi-i.ts. ;
3. Treat each suppls-nental
-------
Si":tr- ci Wisconsin JAN 3 1930
niVJSIC;;: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authoriziii'j Section/Lav/: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of /"-;=;;!: 9/27/79
(Actual or crjticipsicd)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2!l5LI^i2S^G3i&^:^
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.. STATUS REPOPT - GRANTS AtSU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of WisconsinWisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
ORANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program^covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by Stato, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within thit State (include grants to State agencies,
~locaT~agenc~ies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do jaat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
/980
-------
State of Qhio ' " \
DlYISlG'l: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservative and Recovery Act "
-of 197C (RCRA) .
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination " ?:
(Actual or anticipated) f j
i
Total Froject Cost: 577,000 i
(Actual or proposed) I
Federal Grant Amount: J
(Actual or proposed) 533,251 . ' I
Brief description of project or program-'covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste nunajenient
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In Statas
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Unvironmontjl Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; jxpansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic-Jpatio1.; abandonaJ site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS: ' '
1. Cr-mplcte forms, by State, for all project or pvogra.n : r-.tr., d
or_ ur.der consideration, within that State (include qv^nts tc '.ti.t= d
local agencies, plannilTg agencies, others)
' *
2. £"> Jini include F^ 1930 program gnnts or. construct ion gr.. ,t^.
3. Treat each supplemental rcquc?st :
!
-------
. « \ ' . i * r> * f r f I " i «"
.' ' -»"^ "'V **r- ' V'jj_ ' *-^_ - t ' ' ^-^L'lx" ' _ '^d.'1 Vf '^
State of Ohio _
%
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BKA'iCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: " Section /f008(n)(i); Resource Cons?.-vation jnd
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
" Pending indirect rate determination
Total Project Cost: ,.n nnn
Utlua! or proposed) l,230,ooo j
t
Federal Grant Anount: 619,913 !
cr proposed) ' !
Brief description of projact or proyraitt'cqvore-J: This gran: is awa>deJ to sup- ;
port an inventory of land disposal facilities Used en Federo ' criteria, ard ''-
develop.Tsnt of State Solid V.'asto Management Plr-ns, ac. defined :n r-egu'at.'or.s man- .
ditod by Section 4002 of RCRA. Statos must meet certain pleuiiinq nqi.ir.'nient'; in '
the regulations in order to remaMi elioible for' funding. Tiv.> .<. p'lan.ivng re.qi'ire-
r.jents include: the formal idontif ication of reckons i hie soliJ ..as-ce nv.na jun.ent
agencies at o.ll levels of goverivnent; dcviiloonr.dt of le-jal an. regulator/ Authori-
ties over land disposal, hased upon the Federal critrriu; fen.. /a i "of r.erzain "legal
irnedii'ents ts resource recovery; and plarmin.j for adequate T. oil icy r.acicitv, if .
funding permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by SUts, for all project or rro'j»-a': { --nti, ac'/,v_'
or u.:t!er cor.sicieration, within that State (include c/'anti U* rc?.Le ^tOL^:'.
«>
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS J^, 0
u Jo80
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: feticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)0) FIFRA, As amended.
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
Ohio will not take further action on grant until enforcement primacy issue
is resolved.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPp_RT_r__G_ff.'jT_S_A;::,1'.J)
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BP, '-;:'-'.: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Totil Project CusL: $178,431
'
Federal Grant A:TIOL'- $151,669
(Actual or propos-:-:
Brief description :~ ~'.;-ct o1" o^ograsn
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7, 8
& 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
-------
.. STATUS REPOPT - GRANTS AT!'J/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of WisconsinWisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do nat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
- l-ivvn a A.TJ/OR PyA
Stats of
A DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division '
I " * BRAMCl: Waste Management Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation *nd Recovery Act of '-"
1976 (RCRA) U
Date of Award: i
** (Actual or anticipated) ^|OV< 5 ? 1979 [".-'
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3v:06 o^ kCRA. in States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. nivircnmantdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these fends to operate the program ir uhat. Stats. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource jssdsspent
legal and' regulatory development.; permit and manifest system Javelopmerit; expan
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic^'at-'on';
abandoned site and emergency response prcujT.v.is.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Couplets forms, by State., for all project or program c- ;nts,
or uinder con'sideration, within t.hot Stat'i (includt: grants tr M^te
"loV'a'i rtcjencics, planning vTgenc';o5, otheri)
2. Po HQ£. include FY 19SO program grants :>r coastnictijn gri.t:..
3. Treat Ovich suppltT.ental req'.^sc s?p.:i«'ar'.:ly.
*
Total Project Cost: \
(Actual or proposed) 799^003
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) 447 "531
Brief description cf project or program' covered: fins gran* is awarded to sup
port the eventual development of a fully authorized !iaz
-------
State of Misconsin
9
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Consent ion ar-d Recovery '
Act of 197G (RCRA)
Date of Award: r
- (Actual or anticipated) Nov> 5 , 1979 ;r
ToUl Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) ^^ ^ . ;
Federal Grant ,%ount: \
(Autua]_or proposed) 370,350 ' '
Brief description of project or prcnranr covered: This grant is awarued to support;
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^raria, and Jevelcpr.^n';'
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulatv'tis mandataJ by l:-=c- \
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th^ regula-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These pianninj re^uireme.its include'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste nianageme.it agencies at a"il
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory aufjc^-'lies ov.jr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inipojinvents to .
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, ff fundi ig pei-inits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by Stats, for all p'-ojyr; or pro;ran u- ,ti, £;,
or und^r consideration, within that State (include? cjra^ts to Late c-j
"local a'cJ£ncies, pTTrinuTg agencies, others)
2. Do BOA include FY 1930 pro'jr.irr, grants or.r_,ns.rt"itic-n y( ,c-;.
3. Treat each supplemental roquest separately.
-------
-t;;v: (.i _ Wisconsin
niYlSIO;;: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
pu-<«"!. Pesticides
u;.; uwi I.
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration', v.-ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.. STATUS REPORT - GRAMTS AHU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of WisconsinWisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . .
BRANCH: waste Management Branch'
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program' covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or tinder consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do nat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
V {
BRAflCI: Waste Management Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of '
f . J 1976 (RCRA) U
Date of Award: j.
l*£iH*Lof anticipated) December 15, 1979 . |-;
f t'
Total Project Cost: . {
(Actual or proposed) 799^03 >
Federal Grant Amount: |
(Actual or proposed) 447 "531 \
Brief description of project or program covered: This gran* is awarded to sup- j
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardou' ,var,te nuna. lenient
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3CC6 of kCR.-'\. in .States 1
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, t!ie u. S. rnviror.myntdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these ftmds to operate the program ir that. Stats. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature incite: resource assessment;
legal and" regulatory developnisnt; permit and manifest system Javelopmttnt; e,\pan-
sion of surveillance and enforcouent programs; public parti cvat'cn';
abandoned site and emergency response proyTn.ns. h,
IMStRUCTIONS:
1. Couplets fonns, by State* for all project or r.'-ogra.Ti c :nts, a'.V.-.va j
or under con-si deration, within that St-ati (inclutis grants tr '.utc ay.-rui'js, t
iTxra I si^encics, planning agenc-;?s, otharj) i
":
2. Po HQt include FY 1930 program grants or construction grt-ts. |
3. Treat each si:?pl£-r.2ntal req-.t>st sepacat'.:ly.
.
I*1 L f^
-------
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: -Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . -
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003(a)(l); Rosourc.2 Consecution ar-d Recovery "
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Rate of" Award:
(Actual or anticipated) December 15, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 1>261v750 ^ .
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual, or proposed) -370,350
Brief description of project or pronronr'covered: This grant ts awarued to support
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^t^ria, attd development
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulations i:!andat2d by Sec-
tion 4CQ2 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th^ regjla-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These plannirj rpquirc-ma.its include*
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management acioncies at a"il :
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory"autlii.r"'lies ovjr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inip-sdiments to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi ig permits.-
INSTRUCTIONS: ;
1. Coir.plete fortr.s, by SUta, for all ?^ojcsr; or rvc;ran $ '.-its,
gr_und«ir consideration^ within that State (inr.lude cjra^ts to tote
local ~ac|'inci as , pi arim ng agencies, others)
2. Do UPJL include FY 1930 proyrnm grants or.rjns-;n"ition «i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
t
--- ' IV A 1
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS "AND/OR GRAHT APPLICATIONS
State of ^Wisconsin '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: ' Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: 7/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $39,629
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved state plan under section .4(a)(2)
of FIFRA, as amended. The state administered applicator training programs are
not funded out of the program costs enumerated above.
197;
-------
IV A 2
DIVISION:
BRANCH:
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GPsAHT .APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
Air and Hazardous Materials
Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: ' 9/29/78 .
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $25,731 ' ;
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $18,000 .
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
To conduct a pesticide use survey of major state crops for the 1978 calendar
year. The above Federal grant award was made as a supplement to the Wisconsin
certification-grant, =£005242, and was extended to June 30, 1979. Final Survey
report due within 30 days.
I
1379
-------
IV A 3
]-
t
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRA?IT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin '__
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous' Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticide Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: FIFRA Sec."23(a)
Date of Award: 1/1/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431 " -
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative Pesticide Enforcement Grant. Grant will be made to the Wisconsin
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Plant Industry Division
to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 and 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state pesticide
enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring of
industry and user groups.".
*'<-* ;97B
-------
IV A 4
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRAJIT APPLICATIONS
State Of WisrnrisJn
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 12 197g
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $84 375
(Actual, or proposed) '
Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
(Actual or proposed) '
Brief description.of project or program covered:
$55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance.
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all'project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies
TocaTltgenciesV planning agencies, others)
Z. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
IMI
WvL
-------
t
IV A 5
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT .APPLICATIONS
' State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28, 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Qua!ity Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State, (include grants to State agencies.
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
|
IV A 6
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . .
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $7g ^
(Actual or proposed) '
Federal Grant Amount: $33,000 ' --
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vrithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
;'UL
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 474
State Of Wisconsin - SEWRPC
DIVISION: water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cwA 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 264.0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 136.0
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-covered:
Continuing Areawide Water Quality Planning and Management Program for
Southeastern Wisconsin
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active-
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 472
P
State Of Wisconsin - DCRPC
DIVISION: water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: c^^ 2os
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 105.0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 31.0
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Dane County Water Quality Management Program (Section 208)
- Water Quality Plan Implementation and Service
- Continuing Planning, Plan Detailing Annual Review
- Water Resources Monitoring and Data Analysis
- Special Studies (Urban Watershed Investigation)
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 197
-------
ICATICNS
State of WISCONSIN - WISCONSIN SOLID WASTE RECYCLING AUTHORITY
ul VISION- AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
'\uthori -ing Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of reward: September 15, 1979
.Actual nr anticipated'
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual ;jr proposed)
Federal Oant Amount: $140,000
(Actual jr proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase ^1 project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis
for L^coln, Marathon, Portage and Wood Counties (Wausau - Stevens
Point area), having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
I . Co'!'.'j!ete fonns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
°ILJi.n. nc~i"el T^P1- "an rn n g agencies, othars)
2. Do v-ii. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Tre,.-»t each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1979
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 0
State of Wisconsin
- - ~ T~ '"' ~"
»
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979
_ . .
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $999,995
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $228,600
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to supportf;-:^
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal criteria, and development!!:'^
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulations mandated by Sec- [%
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in the regula-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These planning requirements include:
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management agencies at all
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authorities over land -
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to {
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.«**
51
' '
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State ag.enries,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1979 ?*
-------
., --*» i<- -*"-
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS *
i " ' . 11 . " .1.1,,... .... ..'...,.-.....,...,.. , ,.,.,, ,_.
State of Wisconsin
Li " ~ : *
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979
- "
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $400,010
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $284,690
"
Brief description of project or program* covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management
program as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment;
legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation;
abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants tc c.tata agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
(SUV)
X'iJ
1979
v-'':!'"; !,'-:^'-:'lK.-!\. ' I ? i;V-'. :-:i--'i '- ::i;
-------
13
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act, as amended, Section 23(a)
Date of Award: 1/1/79 This date is pursuant to a deviation approval from HQ.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative Pesticide Enforcement Grant. Grant will be made to the Wisconsin
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Plant Industry
Division to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 and 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the
state pesticide enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and
the monitoring of industry and user groups.
AUG 19?
-------
13
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: 'Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and'23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/29/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $39,629
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator
certification program in accordance with the EPA approved
State Plan under section 4(a)(2) of FIFRA, as amended. The state-
administered applicator training programs are not funded out of the
program costs enumerated above.
AUG 1974
a
-------
14
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 9/29/78
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $25,731
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $18,000
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
To conduct a pesticide use survey of major state crops. The above
Federal assistance award was made as a supplement to the Wisconsin
certification grant, #£005242, and has now been completed. Final
Financial Report and Survey publication to be submitted to EPA within
90 days.
AUG 137
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of W1
DIVISION:
Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: A n 12 197g
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
,375
Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
(Actual or proposed)
- ""
Brief description, of project or program covered:
$55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance. .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do rtol include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
>
3, Treat each supplemental request separately. .
'Vs
AUG ' 1979'
-------
16
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin ' - » 1"
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch - . :
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28, 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100 .'- '
(Actual or proposed)
.-
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and,
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control, of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
r :
-j '
J INSTRUCTIONS:
j '. 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
; local agencies, planning agencies, others)
s
2. Do no_t include FY I960 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG -----197
-------
I
17
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award:_ January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
Total Project Cost: $78 72Q
(Actual or proposed) ' - .
Federal Grant Amount: $33,000
(Actual or proposed)
> »
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan.for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
. INSTRUCTIONS: .'
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
;] or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
| local agencies, planning agencies, others)
i x
\~ 2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
j »
j 3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANP/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of WisconsinWisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do no! include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BR,-:.I.H: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/29/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amc^-: $39,629
(Actual or propose:.
Brief description o~ project or program covered:
Administration and maintenance of the Wisconsin pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved State Plan under section 4 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended.
-------
STATUS REPORT^ GKAmS AN P./OK GRAilT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: A-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
; BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
.i Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
' Date of Award:_ January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
I Total Project Cost: $?8 72Q
: -(Actual or proposed) .
, Federal Grant Amount: $33,000
i . (Actual or proposed)
I
! Brief description.of project or program covered:
t
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan.for prevention and control of air pollution and
J implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: /
1. Complete forms, by State, for al'l project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State- (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, pTanning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
R'LKlRT - GRAMTS_/nD/OR_GPxAfiT APPLICATIONS
State of V.'is cons in '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28> 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
] (Actual or proposed)
i s C
} " Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100
j . (Actual or proposed)
i
i Brief description.of project or program covered:
To_assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
| Quality Standards.
i
.
I . INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration , v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
/'
2. Do not. include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
l
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
^
State of
t]
i DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
? »
I BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
i Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
j
i Date of Award: Apr11 ,« 197g
j (Actual or anticipated) wpn "' 1J/y
j Total Project Cost: *84 375
; (Actual or proposed) '
' *
i Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
! . (Actual or proposed)
j Brief description. of project or program covered:
i
i $55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
i for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance.
INSTRUCTIONS:
] 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
' or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
] "local agencies, planning agencies, others)
i
~!
i "x 2. Do np_t include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
I
| 3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GR.ANT APM.ICA7IGKS ^
State of Wisconsin ^
'""' ~l '"" L
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/ORGRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
»
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation *nd Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
* (Actual_or anticipated) May 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $400,010
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $284,690
Brief description of project or program'covered: ijr;s ^ran+ is awarded ro sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardou-" ,vaste management;
program as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3J06 o^ kCRA. m States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tine, the ii. S. r'nvircrimtntal Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program ir chat Stata. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: re.^urce assessment;
legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system J^velopment; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public particvat-'on;
abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1, Complete forms, by State, for all project or program c. .nts, a'J:~,ve
or under consideration, within that State (include grants if '".late a/?ru'.:$,
locat agencies, planning agencies, other*}
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or constrnrtion gr. .ts;.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
*»
0
* E "0 Hi
X* ff) fi ^"*
- O
1 1 «0 3
3T
£ 3£ * V)
HI HI TJ i-i
»3 H) *} TJ
X X TJ
O CJ X
30 5o r> r»
i* i» * Q
z s: x o
Z Z Z PI
» cn
»» O5 X ~
i] pi -«J
-1 «!
PI O 1
38 50
PI TJ
*» 30
£ **) O
5» C cn
TO "Z. ^0
o o n
HI O
Z H.
Cl HI
PI
TJ
50
"? 5» O
3 C,
i n
i f^
30 HI
n PI cn
0 »-3
SCO
O 50 Z
P 3
PI PI TJ
^0 50
PI HI
O ""I 0
O 30
0 30 HI
30 HI
:j 39 -<
C. W
PI < P
n w M
1-3 CO tn
HI H]
O
X
Cn
**5 **3 3£
n -o x
iii
0 «! £
P G HI
O Z «»
PI f*1 C3
a 3 53
1 f
O TJ -S
C 30 Z
i-3 0
Ci »!
O PI 50
30 n o
O Hi :£
c,
PI TJ
n 33
o
30
H4
-3
Ht
H> T!
p
I A M
tn
y f i-i
o »
TJ TJ
P 50
HI a
o <
> PI
HJO
HI
Z 3C
PI
HI Z
Z D
1 -J.
V, f.
O .2
C 1-3
cn
P!
o
o
in
to
ui
z
O
^
TJ
^
O
30
a
PI
a cn
PJ H
Cn r*l
0 3G
O 13
i-l »-
O Z
z z
HI
2J
3P* Cl
^
pi rj
>» o
R 2
M S
O M
PJ cn
Cn
E HI
*» O
Hi Z
P!
30
O
C
p
HI
HI
< 0
4>
a i
p u<
> o
25 I
Z -J
HI f>
Cl
Cl
TO
z
-J IO
ui in
Ul 40
« «
UI »O
H> -J
IO UI
*O UI
-J *v
QO UI
» ^
O -J
H> O
ch o
»J
o
-sj
^
o
Jk
1*1
o
ci cn
o H:
in »
to C
CT* *-?
Z O
0 M
*«> *<
o >»
a
SS M
o a:
30
a: o
PI 0
* z
d V> cn
P) H; HJ
cn PI D
r> 3o c
50 2: n
TJ TJ M
^ t* o
HI * Z
o z
z z o
»» Hi 50
2: *
*» Cl Z
a 1-3
P! O
* 0 O
E a: 30
M 5 HI
D >-i n
PI Cn HI
Cn z
E >-l f
> O P
tn Z P
i-3 t<
PI
q
3C G
*» Z
2; c?
> PI
0 O
PI
z o
PI *. Z
as i o
HJ 0 PS
o» 33
TJ 1
3tJ *>J TJ
O «>
0 P
3D »
3C -
0^
'"*)
c
-J
kO
o
£h
0
Cft
a
P!
tn
o
39
a
HI
HI
a
z
>
z
p
K
Cn
M
cn
O
"*1
p
X
PI
3E
HI
rj
T*
^
Cl
3»
z
TJ
X
»^
o
w
p
z
X
o
*
10 O
Ui 1-9
^ X*
o
Ul
aa
Ul
»
0
JO-
^
»
J*
«o
a>
0
o
in
CO
o
z
o
^*
33
Cn
^3
*
PI
e
£
HI
^
PI
TJ
(-1
^
O
r)
z
11
»<
O
30
X
O
to
1
o
in
I
w
to
to
u
%
a
UI
0
IO
w
«
o
o
o
*»;
TJ
*J
i£>
O
IO
o
UI
o
0
u>
w
1/3
z
0
t-^
30
cn
-1
>
P)
C
o z
PI HI
cn <
O PI
30 xJ
TJ HI
O
2 O
- O
Cl P
33 cn
P! Cl
H.
}*
P Hi
)y
X 05
*i c
**!
o -q
3D 53*
0 P
50 O
13*
3C
t/>
O
o>
1
H>
4h
1
^
*X>
Ul
CO
^
J*
f»
cn
«t»
o
«
Z
"&. to
HI ^£>
Z OD
O *
in
o
*o
i-k
«j
sO
O
-J
C
a
o
o
in
£
o*
z
o
*-
TJ
s.
^
30
a:
PI
>
w w
PI H
r/i n
n 30
0 2
TJ HI
HI P
O HI
"A Z
O
t-<
» cn
al
PI TJ
f C-
r. f
HI ^
o z
PI HI
Zl
s: n
J3I
Cn O
H O
?1 T
3:
»^
30
PI
JBI
HI
Tj
Z
-9
3C
3»
^25
^
Cl
W
PJ
-s.
HI
TJ
£-«
*
a
Z (It/
HI 0V
Z 4*
n-
vO
-J
'
-J
O
o
CJ>
Kl
-J
O
0
Ul
5
o
J2;
O
t«
TJ
HI
P
P
3
O
1-1
O Cn
PI
tn PI
0 TJ
W J»
TJ
HI
o
z
)y
33
w
>3*
X!
HI
O
frj
£
>»
Cn
r-j
r*i
HI
3D
rt
)^
HI
3C
TJ
"z
Hi
3
^»
z
ft
CT
PI
PI
Z
HI
TJ
P
3t»
Z
Z 0"
HI >4>
Z CC
0-
Jk
x>
I*/
-»
-J
\o
o
o
o
*c -
o
0
in
CO
in
7*
O
»-»
TJ
Ht
-^
P
2
o
HI
a cn
r*i
01 tl
rj z
-a <
0 50
l-l Z
o s
2 PI
Z
H
Si >»
f P
-3
M TJ
O 30
3 o
C H
M ^
tJ 0
PI I-J
HI
G O
30 Z
CO
£*
z
50
C
z
o
^J O
q ^4
1
TJ H-
3O Ul
O 1
Cl -*
30 t0
J»
s
cn
o
CO
^«
Ul
o
o
cyt
~4
kD
«
4x
O
^h
"*5
TJ
-4
vd
O
-J
t-»
Ul
O
0
-4
O
£*
^]
VO
HI
HI
t^«
TJ
%»
a
P!
Cn
n
33
TJ
_
O
z
£.
f»
H
PI
30
TJ
a
p
p
c
»3
HI
O
Z
n
o
z
-*
50
O *-*
p **
1
pi 1-
H; ui
> i
i-S ^J
PI CD
TJ
50
O
cv
50
jy
3S
C/I %**
G *
13 \O
TJ Ul
O *d
33
-3 to
O
O
4*
«
«O
*-
Ul
«
J(*
0
o
13
^J
aa
»-»
*-
»*
Ul
o
0
in
C*
Mb
Z
o
H»
TJ
Cl
50
PI
2
nl
30
O
pi n
CO Cl
O K
» TJ
TJ
_, -q
O Cl
Z
« TJ
P
50 Z
PI
* a
S PI
HI <£
o
f1! O
O
3S Z
> z
cn
Hi
n
^
33
^1
*»
-3
2
n
-j
3
£»
^i
]ty
Jl
03
PI
Z'
-1
TJ
P
3P
"«^
Z H^
HI 9*
?? CC"
Cl *
o
-J
in
^»
w
x>
o
^1
o
cr>
O C/i
O ^"<
l/l >-
to G
M* H
z o
o -o
H* <
50 *
c^
1 H>
O S
S "
r1)
50
z
D
O 33
PI CO
in
O tn
3J >-3
TJ -J
**3 PI
1-4
O G
Z Z
HI
<;
> PI
Z 33
CO
!fl HI
X HI
TJ ><
«
30
M
3?
PI
Z
3
53"
P '
Cn
1-3
C
a
t<
o
0 -1
n i
-*
p o>
3* |
X -4
PI
p
p
CS
i-j
HI
O
Z
vj M
3D 00
*fc* \O
Z »
Cn 10
C ^1
Cl ~J
50
HI
H
Z
H]
3:
w
p
)9»
5^
PJ
n
30
1-4
P)
CP "*1
J» TJ
Cn -J
i l *&
Z O
cn -J
t-»
a*
P
t-
^
«r
o n
O 50
a ci
PI S
*
D
P
HI
n
k»
t*
i-a
3
PI
*"> 3""
* £
HI >
» -a
50 O
a
PI 0
-3 »
* HI
^ PI
a
O 50
30 f
z
TJ 1-3
PI
D *-
C S
71 3
tn c
~3 2.
*?\
C H3
"^ O
1-3
TJ 3"
3D P
0
C_ O
m o
n cn
n -j
-jf,
v/-<
\
\
V N
\
N
n
o >
o >~>
Pi H
»-<
> D
-:; ^;
CJ
tn
CO 33 5C
HI r^ G
e
W 30 O
-< f
-J
HI 7! PJ
P O
P ~
H< O
2Z ^ I>
o r> i
HI C3 "O
Cn 1 CD
OI i
UI ~J
UI -0
J
r
O *
*-4 »
I P
P!
!/> 50 J
iS :
* -J t
Hi SC
C i» I
cn z <
5? o :
PI O 1
O 2
O cn
3D Hi '
-} 33
C
n
H3
Ml
O
^-^
7
S^V
^V )
X C
g c
3 *
! (
T^
*
^*\ '
r
X"
V
^i
y"!
^x
.^v.
SEP
1979
-------
f
r>
£. S- "O ri
' 3r» CO f"l M
- a
I I -O Z
z
£ £- in
M M *O ri
ri ri -n in
x a: « t>
t> a x
50 -o n n
* * o
£. f. X O
Z Z 2! :!
CO
*» 31 X~
"! P! «!
-1 *!
PI CD I
73 »
PI tJ
* 73
s: »! O
*» C to
V Z TJ
a o tn
w
o
*
fl > O
a L,
I M
I O
V ri
n i in
O rt
sco
O 73 Z
t* 2
P! PI "O
ri O 73
W w
O -«3 O
O V
O » M
a ri
o -a «c
c. PI
ra M M
ri to tn
M ri
o
z
(A
q ij £
O II X
III
r> «! E
t-1 =:M
o z ri
to a x
PI PI o
a 3 a
« *»
a «o s:
c w z
H O
C, «)
o en
o -j
o »i
Z O
o »
I- <
M SC
2 -4
O *
O - >-i
pi cn n
en
o PI e
TO ti z
»-« >> a
o
2!
c
z
a
50
0
c
z
c,
O
C
z
PI
30
tn
a
c
50
50
O
r>
a i o
z u z
H u>
50 I -0
O ~l »
C" «D O
O Z
*-
o tn
o H
vo C
~J "I
z o
O T}
(0
tr- x
c1
. t-1
z en
o *
M «]
O 01 M
PJ
tn n a
o »o »
-o > t-4
t-i z
o x
«-j w
1-1 z
o o
z
£
*
O H
tr* PJ
> »
91
CA in
l-« TJ
fl t«J
c
O
W
C
to
o vt
o -)
tn >.
to >-J
»O C
a> *-l
sx o
~i 30
(D K
tn 53 5d
«^ PI c:
» -O z
>-l O
PI 5O O
«-. z r«l
r* o ~
^ >» O 53 M o
c: a « z 2 oo
Mri PI 3: O d I
t- x M o >o
r* x > en i a>
M T) in i
z tn *O 01 -J
a -i c1 in j>
M J» M
o cn -4 n
M PJ >
tn m z
O T3 -O H
5d *» c
>-i to z:
o r* i«
l-l O
o
Z S
PI
tn
'<
tn
CO
r*
^
PJ
10
CD S
tr1
n tn
o . c:
o
£ m
> 50
-J <
PI M
59 tn
H o
O
E
03
^
U
o
z
en
73
O ri
M
* O
so z
PI
tn -O
X 50
£ O
» Ct
» ri »* PI
O PI O fi
O 50 O ri
x
P!
53
ta Z
50 ri c
O H 2
n T
O 50
CO
JO
cr-
ui
o
(A
O
O
GO
in
U!
O
O
o
o
o
C- O O
v o »
X O >
n z
CA >-9
en
hi
(Ti
N)
o
ex
PI I 1O 3» 53
Z 10 O 50 O
*. ct o
CA I 53 PJ O
G -J t* -i *
O CD 2 * H
M «- M
50 Cl
< 53
M J.
en z
o tn n PI o
z o 53 -o z
30 *» O tn
O Z 50 «-S
a -a ^ H 30
o tn c
o w o *» n
\o c z *
i3« MO t-i
» KJ tB C C
» 3% >-4 Z 2
O i-J
"^ O
O
a-
tl *»
50 t-
3
c. n
PI O
O en
O
O -O
f V
M O
O <:
*» PJ
no
{A
1-1
tn
Pi
O
PI
O
Cn
PI
r>
f)
w Z
Z D
i 2
s p;
o a
c M
en
PJ
O
Z.
o
z,
O
-J
o n
PJ ri
M
> o
- * -Z-Z.
to ^> D
«. cn
O ri
> PI
ri TJ
crp
ot_r
1979
-------
n
x f. TJ «-j
»» a) o >-«
o
I t "8 5S
Z
5C S- V>
X I - -V
O O X
30 50 n n
j» * o
s: s: x o
z z z PI
en
s» at x »
«! PJ >)
H *!
M O I
30 »
PI -o
* *>
f "1 O
3» C en
50 z -O
o a tn
PI
o
30
«! » O
a c«
PI
I r»
50 H
r> PI tn
o H
o
o
tn
H,
O
P!
d Z
P! HI
tn v
r> »
30 C*
O
o
Ul
z
o
r°
30
cn
O
z
O »
PI ft
tn X
n
V TJ
O
O
Ul
z.
o
z
o
30
O
o
Ul
Ul
z
o
o
o
tn
o
z
o
o
Ul
z
o
,- VD f>
O
X
o
X
£ »
PI Z
O tn O s»
PI H PI
O 3D O 33
30 Z 30 PI
O 3D Z
t* 2:
PI PI -O
el O TO
PI I-*
a "] o
o 50
TJ » M
30 fj
3 -a ~t
C. PI
PI < C*
O t-« fl
4 to CO
ft H
a
X
en
t-t C* »-i l-l f
O fl V V T3 fl TJ
fl CJ flZ f*C5 flO
Oft Ofl Of O C
Zi» Z Z Z * Z Z
z o *«z n
j» * o *» > C1
5J fl 30 PI *33 39 39
PJ O P! < P1P1 PI O
S» O 1» PI X" O > ""I
f.x s: c1 s: c
M ft 3 fi TJ ft o *» H * >
Cn ft tn cn fl cn
fl Cn fl O HI o *
PI *-3 PI O PI "7E C1!
Z Z
H <-l Z H HI
5O 30 30 3D
n *o x
III
O «IJ «
f C 1-4
n
z
o
f
9>
Z
Z
z-
n
K
3:
PI
Si
HI
X
a
PI
m
o "u
e« P-
> v
z
4
n
p>
3B
PI
O
r1
>«
z
a
PI tn
cn -»
CS 50
30 m
fi *
TJ 2
O O
z tr-
f
s; H
3" n
HI o
PI 3
50
O
O O
o z
c- >-»
C" 30
c o
H: f
fi
Q 0)
Z O
O 50
O O
z
HI
39
a 3
i
O M
39 10
O I
Ci -»
50 «O
59
Z
Z
o
*»
z
*
13
n cn
o »
30 -i
fi rq
T3
HI CO
v-< O
o >
to O
a>
I
f: Pi
O >
33 C*
X -1
X
o
30
O
o
wax
pi PI 0
a a Tt
i *
o t> s
C 3B Z
HI O
C- *)
o n 30
5CO O
O H -X
C.
m 10
n jo
H (-1
O
30
to
^
o
o
o
to
o
o
to
o
I f> »-!-» MM
i» «
u> o to
-J O Ul
woo
o>
o
o
o
m
o
Ul
o
z
o
z
o
o
PI ac
CO Rl
O >»
3J 3O
fl H
TJ r1
HI *
j. ^^
o o
z
~ a
> o
30 30
PJ O
* fl
s z
M *»
O -3
M ft
o
£ Z
c» n
HI
3D
PI
f
HI
z
-J
n
PI
PI
z
HI
o
f
*»
z
z
o tn
O H
Ul *»
iO.HI
i) H
z o
T> >
ft -»
Z X
o
*»
z
a
PI DC;
Cn P!
O f
TO -a
fl HI
o f
HI >»
>-* z
o a
o
f O
PI O
J» ft
E: z
s»
cn n
fj O
71 X
30 Z
HI
39
n
*
s
PI
z
HI
» '
z c
o -o a .
O 30 fi
O C\ t* !
o
o
sr1
n
z
PI
W ft f Z CD
f* Z Ul t-l U>
Z -
O -J
90
to
o
-J
Ul
o
09
00
to
f V
3D O
O
PI O
-1 *» tn
* «-a H
O 30
3) *
Z
39 HI
P)
O f
C Z
PI O
HI Z
O f]
"*I O
O J>
30 t"
O
c« o
PJ O
O Cft
Hi fl
I I ft
cn
>»-)
«o -o
o -o
f *
M O
o «:
*» M
t-3 O
ft
Z
t>
cn
p:
o
en
O
ex
10
o
-a
o
K)
K>
VO
O
VO
O
01
tsj
n
o >
o o
PI H
M
> o
z z
c
t»
D fl
>» n
n «c
PJ
SEP
1379
-------
E S -D -J
* eo o HI
o
i i -a z
z
« S- tn
HI HI -O H
I I » -O
O O X
59 50 O rj
t* T* O
s: s x o
Z Z Z PI
» Cn
» 0> X
«! PI -«1
^ «!
PI O I
50 W
P> -O
)» 5O
3E »! O
>» e en
50 Z >O
OOP!
HI O
«! >» O
a c,
w
i n
5B H]
n PI tn
o HJ
3: c:o
O 50 Z
e-1 z
PI PI -O
H O 50
PI HI
O »! O
O 50
O 50 HI
50 Hi
O 59
Cj PI
PI <
O H HI
^ Cn en
en
O T'XJX
l1,1
O «! E
f GHI
O sr HI
en o x
PI M o
o a «
*»
Q If E
C 50 Z
-i O
C, »!
TJ M 50
50 O O
O >-J Z
O
PI T>
n 50
H] HI
o
50
HI
HI
K
H» "^
f
t I HI
Cn
f f> HI
O -O
T> »O
t- 50
HI a
o <:
»» pi
o
o
ut
to
Ul
z
o
o
en
c
a:
pi
>»
0 tn
PI M
tn
n is
50 HI
o x
Hi HI
O JJ»
z z
o
£ 0
t* a
HI -z
PI r^
50 M
tr«
O
e o
pi
HJ Cl
HI O
K <
31
Z
*»
Cl
PI
S 0
Z 00
HI 1
1^
u o»
e- i
z
Ul
o>
0
u
4*1
w
o
^
^
-J
»-
o
0
Ul
Ul
4W
z
o
o
en
c:
X
m
a z
PI HI
Cn 7)
0 *
59 f
t» 3
HI HI
O X
55 H«
>* Z
59
PI T>
*» f
Z *
^t 2
0 Z
tn HI
z
E Cl
Cn O
M O
PI c:
z
50 Hi
k»
i.)
a
z
«-]
2
^
z
^
C1
%g
M
Z
HI
TJ
f
^i
Z
M H»
Z 0
Cl -4
tO
>o
on
0
o
Ul
Ul
flO
z
o
d
Z
X
£
PI
O CO
Pi HI
en
n 3
a HI
T) X
Hi HI
o f
3 Z
50
> PI
TO fl
PI «
V -O
E f
M 3»
O Z
PI
0
S PI
tn <
-3
n
H
50
7»
H
2
Hi
2
TM
Z
3»
Cl
PI
3:
PI
5S
HJ
o
f
35»
Z
z .
Z 00
O CF»
(J
Ul
o
o
o
Ul
Ul
*J
z
o
o
z
o
a:
PJ
%*
O en
PI HI
tn
fl 2
50 HI
o -x
O *>
Z Z
n
** S
PI Z
* r>
E HI
HI C1
O
yi o
"^
s:
> Cl
tn o
Hi <
PI -1
tn
50
PI
^i
H
2
^1
5E
H)
2
^»
Z
*»
Cl
PI
2 -
PJ
35
H)
0
f
£»
7* I-
z to
H< to
Z u/
00
o
0
o
o
Ul
J..
H)
z
o
tJ
2:
5»
P!
en
O
O HI
PI J>
en
n -c
50 O
-o r1
H) C
O HI
z o
>» 0
PI Z
> -1
E 50
HI 0
D tr
PI
>*
E Cl
> PI
tn -2
HI O
1*3 *<
PJ
>«
(-4
2
^ O
z ex
>-i 1
K)
2 0
> 1
Z -J
S> ^
Ci
PI
2
PI
Z
H
D
53
O
0
S* -J
2 Ui
O
O
o
to
w
1^
«
0
>>
t^
o
o
Ul
On
w
z
o
.50
2
O
,_,
cn
3»
O Z
PI
en
0 C
59 Z
o <
^4
0 0
Z "'I
53
PI
f
-)
^l
O
IS
Cn
I
HI
D
CD
PI
£
1^
P!
Z
E 0
3t* ^
-J 1
P! O
50 Cft
1
O -J
C »
X
PI Ul
Ul
Fn *
50 ON
HI H*
PI ~
O
0
Ul
to
*J
z
o
o
2
n
Hf
Cl
ff
o z
w
Cn a
o pi
3J -0
u.
**
o -q
z
H) H
O
r> TO
O PI
3 tn
50 0
O C
z n
*» PI
H en
PI
>
o
33
PI
HI o
Z 0>
PJ 1
to
a -
PJ i
en -j
HI ^
C^
a:
)a*
H
PI
O
-
)»
50
PI
s: oo
HI tO
CJ *»
tJ M
f -
^
5j
Z
«
H*
t*l "»
KJ »-»
"1 *C
O %0
-D *
>-J >O
(n ui
^
. o
o
'Ul
U9
m
z
o
t)
2
o
Hi
51
%*
a z
PI
tn 73
n n
30 TJ
t)
HJ O
O
Z Z
^
tn c
3F* >y
-a f
PI
S B
HI "1.
a en
PI O
^
E 50
* n
H pi
PI en
50
0
e
x>
r>
HI
-9
K
2
Jw
Z
)»
, cs
PJ
2
PI
Z
*i
o
P1
3»
z"
3;
HI H*
Z *O
Cl M"
-J
Ul
0
u>
Ul
Ul
^
4k
>o
H»
o
0
ut
ex
tO
z
o
Cn
2
O
Hf
Cl
3w
a z
PI
tn a
O PI
53 -O
a
H O
0
^
f C
7^ ^
PI cr1
tn
yj
TO' ^
n en
en o
-) C
O 50
o n
* PI
-! tn
HI
O-
z
Cl
50
2»
z
H]
t?"
59
O
Z"
Z >
HI N)
2»-
to
to
Ul
0
o
Ul
Ul
K>
z
o
-
o
"
PI
en
n'
a
z
a
PI C.
tn t)
r> -o
a PI
o
-S -O
o z
Z HI
e
> p1
50 »»
PI
> w
E P3
HI O
O HI.
PJ O
z
S >»
> p>
en
Hi O
PI PJ
<
50
PI
£y
>-)
2
*^
Z
>-)
2
£
Z
J>
Cl
3j
PI
Z
HJ
tj
P1
^*
Z
z **
H4 "
z. -
Cl a>
o
o
o
0.
o
Ul
UI
«*
Z"'
0
-
o
PI
en
-
0
PI
a z
PI Hi
en 50
n v
50 t*
O 2
>-3 HI
o 3;
Z HI
f Z
50
PI -0
* r1
E 3o»
HI -A
O _
PI ff*
S "3
> PI
en <
PI
50
PJ
f
Hi
3;
PJ 0
Z 00
Hi 1
IA
2 Ul
> 1
Z -J
3t» tO
Cl
PI
3;
n
z
HJ
0
P»
^i
2
Z H.
HI 3
U)
4»
O^
H»
gl^"
Ul
«
-J
U)
^
o
0
Ul
ut
VD
2
O
-
en
0
HJ
a
ij
o
PJ to
tn V
O Cl
3) HI
TJ V
H] E
O
Z
O J
PI
2
Cl
^
Z "
H)
*!
O
53
Cn
E
Ht
a
C* 0
4*
0 1
O 0
Z £*
n i
PI -i
z \o
j
3>*
HJ
0
50
~
f~
Aj
(X
-M
-O
o
0
H*
«
o
H»
ex
«
o
o
0
o en
0 «H
Ul »
o> c:
ct\ ^
z o
0 50
a >
"C3
n ^
MM«
^C
3CT
I.
P1
PJ^C
tn -o
r> ti
50 PJ
*< 5O
a
H] "O
o z
Z HI
en
** a
50 tr1
PJ >
E tr
a.x« .
s o
* PI
31 <
PI
_ .
3d
PJ
Hi"
2
tj
Z
HI
2
^>
2
>
Cl
PI-
2
PI
2t:
*3
*TT~'
H«
y> -
Z7'
Z."
HI Ul
2r ao
.x>"
0
Cl
50
*
-J
«»
a TJ
D 53
O d
PI 2
*-
O
P"
(4
fi
*
^)
^
2,
y>% ^1
* E
3» 50
5O O
0
PI O
^ >
* <-3
^ PJ
Cl
0 50
50 f
"0 HJ~
t1^
O >
C 2
r*i o
en cr
HI Z
«^
0 M
fl O
j
*tj 3v
50 IT1
O
Ci O
n: o
o tn
*-3 HI
en 50
HI nq (
*» -D :
PI 50 1
-.-i
<
2 Z !
O ~"
31
P^ tZ
ci n
z
ut
Ul
C
3
P
tn i
HI
a a
a j
m :
50 e
PJ C
o t
50 t
(
t
\
Z
PI
P! OOOOOO.OOOOOCVO O S» O
00 OA ^1 W O> tO Cft O3 ^J -*O (X*cp |C^ ~1 ZZ
H>toooK>H»t>joc oeo»-ooo
cx^juiuio^H*uitOti>>^ui^tlo cn
c HJ
*» ra
H3 "C
PJ
SEP
-------
> OCA OO-OOOOOOOCOOC05O
r» OH oo.ooooaooH»HFi
z: i: M H tn ** uiuiuiuitnuiuiuiwi>»k't»'o
>» DJ O M 10 -3 **4>.,t>.4»wj>j»«»j*HZHo
» o x>c .inioc:Mt«itn
I I tl Z U< H *-».UW.^*»tOU»H » H
z zo . z ar z s= z z z z zo «
S£»t/> -I3J OOOOOOOOOTO XZ
H H "«i r»i r»"or»~
3: X TJ «!>» > *O M "O 10 V *O T3 TB TJ *- O » 3:
tj a x c. eaoMi:
» » o o 3: H srasiesECHHCB t« H PIS: o r»
>> >» o Mte M n PI PI z » ro 'a ox *- a
EEXO- O~ CnCnClitOHMl-lCc: S^ZI
Z Z Z PI X H H H H «i H H T) UI
» co M to PI o o sc :t TJ ui
*»CBX ci--j »s-Z3:ooasMtr' ui
«)!«]«) >>» zwMw>'jeet«]*»i-«
vi-ij o = -) o oncinaoa oasoaowocn r»
wot t»iw «cpiWPia:m3:w3:piHpiHn>-it«i>-j *
30 TO Cnt? vi'tjcn^HCA^tc/iv-icoMC/i^oi^CA^iCft 2
Ft -o rjpiij rj-oooocjoooorj o owns: «-i
»«» »-oc 5Ot»i»>io»»'jjj»iox»-n-niiTJziJw
SE^O M<^tC I-150WZWZ1-12I-I wflMTOM MO Z
>cu> *n f t» T> T> TJ T> OOTJOTJSTJX *
-n z -o ^ow «-j'ij >4tnHCn«-3ln<-j »9 >-j ^»MHII s
OPI -^-^n Mt»iM3;>--4 MTj*-«Tj>-«rjwo PI
M n o 02 ao oo oo o or- o t- a a: o *
z~j ss-os: ZtHT;T033)2:t-i2 Xf-zvzft-t-zx
Ow C > ^z«pi PI O~ Z ~ 2: O ~
< n> -i w . r* c* 3 j» n
3 MM ac'z-^-a-z.-o'
O . M>-ia>
n>o wx»<
ac4 ?io> - -
in x: *» -j o * ci a o o z >» t^oia o-oo
IO *!:« MZO M CZ>-3 MMPI PlfrtO
ton nns floox-i-ia: o >^
rjwcn wa: s:*» msmr'Z'^ sas szs:
o«-J soto *»z><*-<«-iciio >» >» >» >c»
cs Dior'w*^ tnwtnotno
» -o <-* no n r> < n PI »« 1-3 *t o H <:
tr"2 *<« piomopio o< m PJ PIXPJHI
PI PI -o w 30 p; » s i 3: x PI 3; .
-iota >-i«i -jzz'^jei'zz -» «^i >^ -J
MM MM tC»«»)Zrt5D5D5D»
o-«io £ w n-3Pi*» pipitntn
O33 M *»W>C13:>»»>->>
T97IM WO .H<>-JP1O^>-SHIH
»rt cz- spiszzzxxa:
oxi-: TJ M >«ior4i-imnoiiino
C.P1 Pi * *
-
o M M <«oo z .-N> » »«> 50 a
HUD) M >-» Cl 3K O X M *»»» >» i PJO
o. PISEPJM n se m n ' H
o » XPissz xwxse c:
» *» « o PI o PJZWPI co
o-z ss x -a z H ' z as
n 10 x o ti as "o "o e* *o "o o so "c
III*. ». *. > O >> Z > » Z5C
% Z -ZOO Z Z Z 3 SO H H
f) **J J£ 1C *J H ^4 *** Z PI ?0 IO Z * 1"^ Orf Z Z ** 1*1
^* d M 9* \0 S3 O^ fc*4 tfo ^C 1^4 X* £* 4^ t^ ("4 O Z O V^ ^) ^4 *J £} y
OZH to C* CTi O^ ZO O>3CU> UI ^ZtOO^-JZiOZ*-* C!^
CffOX * * C1*O» » » >Ci» ^O%C1 PIO
P1P1O *C *«J ^4 >O O^Q^^'O Cf* v-' QD UI 00 OO CnC
OOTIK1 3 O M Ou>O lO l<> J- HZ
j O -0 £.
\ C » Z
HO
C, "t Ci W
O W ^J 30 Z
tDO C O H O H
H-400 O> O> tO > O * O U5 vD OUIO
O » » » H» » - - H- C, O
50*-* O O ** P]OOO«OO4»OU>U' ^ Oi-^OCn
HU1 O O UI 4»O«^O M P!U"HH
K C . CO
- »! S
r1 * c:
I I M . C« C«
Co M . l-l
>> *» H H Z
O -O K C>
O -0
C" 33 HI 30
MO O I»l
O < X H
>» PI M PI
HO O> O Z
M M H '
: o*> oo M
j Z 3! HO O
,1 t-t z a H
S z o , z * to
. , "E . J= HO
i oz ** ** W** *" ** ** r ** :°'*1 C^
i
.
C/l ' QDU)' tOHtO«OHO *-4
PI * *^ O'MOOOOO. OOCO»»O
«-- * O\OOO 9< 0> 00 -J . O O O f OPltJ O
IO M U* l»> U* *UJ OA Wl O^ > CO
C. «
?» «
-} -C
PI
SEP 1979
-------
*»
o
- o
I I T> 2
Z
z: s:- v>
IH i-i TJ -a
o en
o ^
01 »»
w -)
M C
Ul M
Z O
X X - -O
o a x
50 50 n n
t» * a
se z: x o
z z 2 n
- (a
» 3) X ->
*q n *>
-t »!
PI O t
v -a
PI ti
* -a
£, ») O
* C tn
30 Z TJ
OOP)
w r>
Z i-J
PJ
o
TO
"I t* O
a c.
i PI
i n
50 H
n w to
o H
3C CO
"O 50 Z
C" 3
PI P) "O
H O tO
PI II
O -"I O
O 50
O 50 M
» t-S
O -T) <
C. PI
PI < C*
rj w M
M co ca
M H
o
z
Ol
»!>» S
O -0 X
III
o »! s:
e* e M
o z n
wax
PI. PJ o
o o n
i *>
o -o s
c: 50 z
M O
C, *«J
TJ PI »
* o a
a n t£
c,
O
JO
to
o
z
-j
«»
X
' z
z z
W PI Cn
oi tn H
O O fc>
T> H O H H
PI *» PI »» PI
CO Ol
DO OO*O
53 PI tO ffl G
n T> M TJ CO
-t) ft O -i IT1
MO t-H O O
o *n o "i
z -z -s.
~ X X *»
PI PI i-3
en *» a: > pi
Hi X Z X Ol
PI ><
ca en
O OH
C H PI
CD f I
O Ol
O -!
tn *
z o
O 53
- K
01 *»
3T "J
M X
Z
z
P) f
o> a»
O X
P)
r>
S
>«
<
01
tn
>
Cn
a
na
PI
58
M Ol
Z M
X O
1-1 Z
Z >-
PI
II)
C 10 O
*- * Cl
en rt i 3B
C m -J *
o 30 o> 3:
PI
50 -00
< -a -a
n t*
Ol l-l
o « o
» o m
M r« z
o tr" -^
H c -«
-< -5 *!
O l-< M
zs o r»
~ Z f
~i
o n i-i
r" o o
> z z
O> -1
01 5H >
M a 3
fl t* O
HI
r> >» o
> « r1
H P)*"
W Z IB
o n oo
z < «
n
o M
s o
O HI
e K
CD a
r1 o z
ui
a i n
K »~ 50
o o
o o
tn ui
o
z
o
z z
z z
PI PI
. Ol - Cn
o o
O -i O ~»
M >> PI *
Cn 01
0*0 O *D
50 O 5» O
o
in
z
o
O i-i
bl
TO
*
*. c
^ i-»
s: o
o -a
t- K
D >
*
-) m c:
>» *o z
-» Q
PI 50 a
50
o
o
o
or- _ .
PI W P1M
CA i-i Ol -i
o t* n f
I Z 50 3
n x
-a
50
O
O
O
>-« o
0-0 W ~
O 50 Z o
an t«i 3: aa
PI 3: tn rj i
o a s>
> «4 I CD
M > ui I
O in ~J
t» Ul HJ
1C1 M f M
xjf "Of *on TJO
4C3 I-3C HO >-3O
Mi-i i-li-3 »HG *HtTI
OK DM oz otr
zo zo zrt zn
co o ae o >
HO > o TJ -4
*> z HZ PI &
M 50 50 to £ Z
O OH H
EC" "O C* Ofl O
>» O PI l-« PI
H * f *» H
PI
50 PI C PI
Z HZ
or» M n
> PI
Ol Ol
PI
3D
PI
> PJ
01 tn
50
"t
O
c«
>»
Z
01
HI
o
"O
V
O Ul
M
a
»]
o>
) CD
O>
b>
i»
«
Oi
w
o
o
«o
» o
x»
w o
01 O
o
50 Z
O "SI O
f O ' Z 0-
I HI
O*- >-
50 u. 3: *.
O I > I
O -J Z -4 Z
50 CD >> to k»
f* C\ IT*
X
Z
^
be
o:
»-3<
X i
rs
PI
3
PI
Z
KJ
tfl
o
o
o
Ul
O
o
*- ' O
^ o
*v 2>
c*
O
O
tn
o
ro
O
e*
£>
O
O
O
tr
-j
CD
Ul
.*» TO
50 O
» n
n PI o
O 50 "O Z
50 > O Ul
Z 50 H
59 "i *S 50
PI C
O J» O
e z ' «-s
no M
tn C O
H -2. Z
O »*
^ o
1-9
O t*
50 C«
o
o
i-i >
C*
tin
Cn
f 50
M O
O <
> PI
H O
«-t
O >
Z ~3L
PI
<-t Z
Z O
i 3:
ff PI
o -z
c: «-3
01
P)
Cn
PI
to
o
m
a
10
o
o
o>
o
en
10
O
0>
a o
PJ rt
»-f
* o
z z
o
Ol
D «4
f PI
«tj
PI
SEP 1979"
o
-------
o
E E "O ~3
f a» r» M
» o
I « TJ A
Z
E E» »
l-c -< t) HI
HI HI *! PI
S X t)
O O X
» 3) r> r»
j» > o
s: s: x o
z z 3 PI
- tn
t» W X
«I PJ »!
HI "fl
PJ O I
» -a
pi *D
x> »
K *! Q
* C Cn
» Z T)
O O TO
M O
Z HI
61 »-«
<
PI
fl * O
O C.
I M
a
TO »a
r» pi cn
o n
SCO
ono z
t* z
PI PI t»
HI o »
PI »H
0-^3
o »
O58 M
50 HI
a » <
c, w
m < f
n M M
i cn cn
»-i HI
O
Z
o>
.
O "O X
ill a>
.O «! E w
f C n *
O 2 rt W
U O X
PI W O tf>
a o -» *
i * ~i
O TJ £
HI O
C, "!
o ?i a
woo
O HI S ^O
t, -
tn -a *
O 50 01
H M w
o
X) N>
l-l \C
HI N>
tr1
I I ft
en-
s' > HI
o -e
o -o
C" »
M Q
o «c
> PJ
-3 O
o
o
UI
CO
ca
Z
O
O
o
X
5O
n
o M
PI O
u> s
50 C*
o n
w C
0 Z
« o
~ p
3)
PI
£
O
W
iSTE TREATMl
z
-i
INAGEMENT PLANN
Z >*
o
o
o
o
UI
UI
^B
z
o
50
O
X
o
O 5»
PI H
cn PI
50 a
O i-l
o
tn
z
50
1-4
PI
<
1EARSHOPE
i
UI
en o
79 6
JRVEILLANCE PRO
x o
3; *
OD
UI
UI
UI
o
0
o
UI
UI
z
o
H*
"0
0
X
0
o z
P! Hi
cn c:
33 x
n
l-l Z
o a
2T i-l
PI TO
O O
PJ Z
*»
e f
COUNCIL
ISTE TREATM)
4
K>
a: o
79
4NAGEMENT PftOGR
3: o»
ca
UI
0
UI
aa
o
o
o
o
01
]
PI
50
TJ
O
t- »»
C 1
79 i,9<
in CONTROL PROG!
>» CD
500 4,646,474
< GRANT
o
o
Ul
-UI
z
0
o
o
X
o
a <;
PI i-i
01 11
TO 2:
*O f9
O J>
z c*
o
58 a
m HI
s: n
a M
M O
z
s:
HI PJ
PJ -S
TO
PJ
*
Hi
'3C
Z OK
HI 1
*
79 1,2'
INAGMENT PRQGPAf
o
ut
o
00
o
o
o
UI
UI
z
o
o
z
o
H
PJ i-J
Ol
a) X
0 0
l-l *»
O 50
Z PJ
E
53 O
PJ PI
£ 0
0 0
pi -a
o
JATING
;STE TREATMl
z
Hi
Z IO
Z -J
0
o
UI
o
z
o
o
3
o *
PJ tr-
cn r1
a K
0 3J
i-i
*» i
o
X 01
as -»
*> 10
71
Pi
^j
PI
Z
*3
O
50
O
UI
o
0
UI
in
UI
Z
o
o
2
a:
<
o *>
pi f
oi f
58 ~Z
TJ V
l-l Cl
O M
T. O
E*i O
E X
0 M
(A
cn z
PJ
Hi
50
fl
H
Z
H
3E
kKAGMENT PLANNI*
n o
o
o
0
o
0
m
UI
00
z
o
90
PJ
O
PI
CB
0 PI
Pi -a
Cn n
TO rv
TJ t4
sa
50
3E
O
C
m
(
1 SAMPLING I
TO u>
0 1
ft.
79 (
'OR OH TRIBUTAR
PJ <0
UI
^1
-J
M
Oh
O
O
UI
UI
O
%
o
50
ac
M
o
PJ
o>
O PI
PJ 50
cn CJ
5OO
-0 f
M t*l
o o
z w
50
PI
r1
n
PJ
o
"1
z
PI
O>
O *k
n i
PI UI
M o
PJ *o
O
r1
*
X
PI
50
E**»-
m
OK
W
O
0
UI
Uf
O
O
PI
s»
HI
HI
tj t*J
PI
cn O
a <
O
fH
0 **
Z
7J TJ
PI O
O M
PI 0
z
£
Cn n
>-» r>
in »<
n
PI
v
HI
H)
O
79 '
INAGEMENT PROGRJ
2 *>
cr
O
u>
n
o .
o
0
UI
OD
Z
o
»-*
a
P!
H,
n
HI
a PI
PI
cn O
TJ J»
i-i a
o
Z -1
xi ca
W tf
Z 50
a v
PI H
* O
PI
Hi
TO
PJ
H
x
-i
<
INAGEMENT PLANN3
z
on
f X
PI
>
o z
PI O
CA
TO l-l
-a ><
MO
Q "I
z
PI
H; H
o
3C «!
-9 ro
w
-j
O l-l
c: r-
a>
e«
i-i
Hi
Z Ul
Hi 1
50 **
o *.
-J
1C
o
K>
o
o
UI
o
a
«k
O 50
CJ (71
PJ 2C
O
TJ
tH
n
PI
f -a
50 O
o
HI »
*-* PJ
a
O 50
TO >
50 H
P5
e s
CO C
-i Z
H
C >-3
50 C*
O
C_ 0
n o
o cr.
-j -j
0150 51
H P! c
* -0 I
PI 50 t
0 Z *
a: o
0 ~ <
o
O 1
UI
UI
1
STATUS REPORT
z s
Pi
l-l Z
|| . ^ (\ ^ _ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ _ ^ g;
i . _ -- . - - o in
c: w
01
PJ o io oooooooooooo>o
o
v pi
PI
u>
J \
ao
0 -O
-J UI
»» ' *~
o ', 1
»j
vo
o
o
to
0
^ !
o
VO «O
0 0
OD -»
0 »*
1*1 O^
i
sD
0
0
t-i>
^
^
0
iii
>o
o
-J
»*
-1
-1
o
vO
0
UI
V*
4k
SEP
1975
-------
s: je "a t
* CD o
O
o
in
,u
Z
o
o en
O H
in l»
*. -)
10 C
o -*
2 O
O 71
x x» -o
CT O X
» » n o
>» »» a
« E X O
Z Z Z PI
GO
*" W X
*! PI T
H "!
wot
u a
PI TJ
f 30
SE "I O
* C Cn
50 Z TJ
O O PI
MO
a **
CJM
PI
t > o
o c.
i PI
i <"»
» H
o FJ tn
o «-s
2 C O
W 50 Z
f z
P) P> "O
M O 50
H l-«
O * O
O 50
o -a w
» **
3 to -<
c, PI
M <: t-1
n M M
3 o> at
t-t t-3
O
z
(A
O -O X
lit.
O *! X
fen
O Z «"3
was
PJ wo
o o »
i >»
a -o s
c » s=
>^ o
Cr «9
O !fl W
50 O O
O i-l 3
C.
M 'O
n »
t-
I I M
o o HI
X XX
»-l H4
o o
en
PI O -»
Z PI >»
O <; " ^3 TJ HI
PI 1-1 PI » PI
en 50 en
o o o o c
TO Z 30 ""I Z
11 z <-< cr
"O PI T3 "Z PI
HZ -} * 50
O > D C 50
Z r* Z 50 Q
T> t- 3
en 50 HI o
"10 O »
> n PI as
H PI O Crt *»
PJ O O O H
4 3 G PI
'so c-1 o
o z PI Pi en
PI HI tn O
3O V PI C
o o -a
50 PI 1-9 O
O Z V PI
CO en
3K K X TJ
O Ol 50
O
o en ci tn tn j
O ^ 50 M P! C
Ul » J» J* 13 2
w -^ Z >-J O
-J C -) P) 50 C
\0 ^t ~--J 1
Z O *» >
-J 50 3 -r r
tf> X X O
r» -o «i
"»! >> O 50 O C
c o « -s <
on wx o
x ae o i
M ~ * I (
a -a ui
Cn "O cr
P) fj C1 0> i
Of M
o s> -j o
n M *
M z
O
O
TO G
l-l CO
-3 11
M n
o
Z £
*»
HI
n PI
< »
>»
Z
fl
>O
at
PJ
o
CD
t*
CO
X
01
M
m
en
G
PI
so
to
O
C
50
O
PI
50
O
ra
o
o
IJ S£
-a tn
* t) o
l-l 0> M
Z I O
o o as
O -i 50
NO O
-a n
SC 50
PI *
pi o
< 30
O M
en
£ M
* O
n z «» »
T1| (-* ^ S!
» t- t) l-i >»
I 50 » 50 C
tfl K» O 53 O *r
< Ml O C» 3
tn I » P! O P
4 ~4 » -» » t» 3
PI 0) Z * H »-i
3! «- PI *» f-
« *3 a
en 50 e *
e *» to z
TJ z
P) HI 50 r
5O CO O PI C
< O 50 «a 5
M 30 * O C
in z ?c >
CD
K>
tn
o
«
to
O M -J
O J O
o
M
SB
50 \O
a u»
Z w
o *>
z
c,
o
O
O
M
O
Ul
in
to
00
O Ul
Z ~*
vo
o-
50
O o
no
50
*»
P]
D
a o
tn C
O «-3
> o
-3
o *
50 f
o
d O
PI O
o en
H <-]
o -o
O.-O
f w
w o
o <:
o >
Z 2
M
M Z
Z O
I 2
Z TO
O Z
C rt
01
PI
~J
1O
o
OX
O
SE
z en
«-i PI
so n
O HI
t- M
O
"3 *
v *.
o ^^
00 CO
o
en
w
o
o
z
' o
n t-« D >
o *. on
~J u» p; «-5
OO U4 r-l
t~ <-. y* o
-* v z-z
U*-* C
<0 01
" o **,
SEP i979
e
t>
-------
n
3C £ -C H
*» to f"j HI
o
1 I T) 2!
Z
£ S« to
HI HI -0 >-}
H HI -3 PI
a: re « -o
o o x
30 50 O O
» *» » O
£ £ X O
z z z PJ
in
»» to x
n PI "t
H "1
PI o i
n a
PJ ti
o cn
o HI
UI X>
Z O
-I TO
^ <
£ >-J
HI X
Cn
r»
en
o -i
pi *»
O «> HI
PI «-J P>
(n
o o -C
>»fl-flG
z.'""ioi-inJ
i-etyi-ozc*
30 Z TJ >-J » M
o o c»i HI H r»
M n o c
2 H a i3 «
cn M ~ *« >»
< r« HI
n en n
n -n -a
> PI
^ cn cn
PS a <
o
TO
n *» a
D C,
I PI
i n
58 >-3
o PI tn
O HI
z c o
f z
PI p) TJ
n a -a
t*i HI
o -*j a
o 50
o » M
3D HI
7> -o <
c, pi
w < t*
n trx
,
Ill
I *»
o TJ s:
C 50 2
-1 O
C, -«l
O PI 3O
500 a
O --J 3
Ci
ra t>
n 30
i-J M
-D 3) i-3
c f\ M
1C PI Z
f en
M W
r> e
*0
£ :o
» 50
«-j <:
PI M
TJ co
M
w o
f< Z
I »
t» -J f
C «0 3d
TJ.
1-1 en
o
2!
o co
OHI
UI *»
u> «-»
O" c
O>M
K O
O 13
- <
£ HI
MX
tfl
n
Of
z *
tn x
O 1-4 t«J
t«iz
cn <-«
n o o
» Z W
HI a z
-on
o w
n H»
e> o
PI z
*
z »
tn r1
to >»
to
*n to
Pi HI
> «!
w M
HI n
MO
HI 2
W
-j
C
O
K
o
o
z
o
cn
o
o
z
cn
o HI
PI z
Cn
O O
50 Z
HI 50
O
-3
O
Z
n
50
X
PI
Cn
a
50
o
3D
*»
a
z
o
o
z
o
o
£
HI
CO
O
O
cn
O -«
PJ Z
Cn
n o
50 PI
HI a
o -n
z '
z
f HI
PI 50
*» »
£ tr-
Cy 39
p) m
Cn
s: o
> G
PS o
33 tn
cn
o
c
f
H«
»4
O
O
UI
Kt
z
o
tn
n
o
^2»
tfl
O HI
PI Z
Cn
r> a
O HI
H
HI O
O **J
CO 30
f >
Z f
o
o
UI
K]
VD
Co
C
HI
CO
o
o
CO
a HI
PJ z
cn
r> to
a a
HI J»
o 50
-3 O
o o
z -n
CO
HI »
9
r*
o
o
-
o
o
O
o
o
o
o
O
o
00
i w
VO
CD
O
O
UI
UI
in
o
z
a
PU
o
o
PJ O
co -n
n
50 IS
HI i»
a ^
o »
z C*
39
£ PI
M a
m s
30 50
"O E*l
a CA
c:
H4
O
O
Z
50 -
O O
f *
I
Cn O
k) UI
* I
50
O
n
H> , O "O *>
» 00 -D 00
f -J O K)
50 II f O
Z CO
O O
*«J C
«1 33
O
tj m
30 CO
O
O
I
I
-4
IO
X £
PI V
cn 1-3
O TO
3.
O
CO
CD
O
o
O
"
O
O
0
o
O
O
O
0
o
50
O
C,
fl
CO -
UI
O
o
UI
u>
vO
UI
o
o
o
10
o
o
o
o o o ocnn Cn 53
o o o OH33 Hirn
ui ui ui ui>»>» *. -c
ilk Jk «k 4kt-}Z MO
-J «O ^4 -*JCHI P15D
» OV > IO -I «. M
Z Z Z E O »
o o o o ~o s. z
»- * H» >- *< HI O
O t> Co ~
o «o -o tos» o » r»
C O Cl D 1C
en -n .-n D»^PJZZO
o o o * I to o
c x x z * H. i
-J PI TJ Z ui
X < «S "O U
pi * * rj t* i»
> f f o HI
aco or1 of oc ri
PJHi P1P1 PJPJ PJZ S»
topi COK tn>< cnH 72
n 50 n o r> x n
50 a 50 S » £ 50
IH HI>Hia>HI50 Z
53 £ *O HI *Q t^ "^ nfl Sa»
^-3Hl v^PJ HiPJ HIO* 3C
I-4COHI3)H|33HI W
O O O O O TJ
ZO Zi) ZO Zf
~Z -C ~C *»
CO *» >» Z
4» HI *» C" J» f *
3J2! 33M 3)H< 3Jrt
PI PJ *S PJ Hi PJ O
»59 >< »< *-S
£ PI S £ £ 3C
« S> H» II HI HO Hi
o o f o r1 o
PI "o cn J« tn t» m
t- z z
S.V £ 3 £ £
J> Z f* HI J> * >
co cn z cn n co
HI n HI a HI n n
mo p3 cn *< PJ
3
HI -X HI >4 -I
50 30 33 50
"i PI m M
**»**
ae 2c ar z ~> >»
?t &
*4 ,.3 >-] H > -n
30 O
*» *>»»» PJ O
s . 2: ss z HI > ai
> 9* 3w *» # H» HI
«-»tn j»
i-S
e
tn
93
e» «
O 50 -O
JO 3* ' O
50 HI HI
PI
O *
c 3:
M O
tn c
HI 2!
HI
re
3
PJ
Z
O
PI
PJ
Pt
z
"C *O *O *O
f. t-r (-. f-i
»>»>*'
Z 2! Z Z
Z H» Z Z * Z
HIN0 H41O Mitk Hl-sl
^ OD ZO ZUI ZCD
O
O
O
CD
'Jl
OH
o
o
o
59
O
NO
K)
UI
K)
0>
O
O
O
O H
n o
Hi
O >
30 f
O
c,r>
m o
O to
HI HI
IT"
I I l-t
o>
O TJ
t- x
t-« Q
c *
Z iC
P5
n
>-»
o
z.
t-t
o
z
tr >
en
t"5
«o
O
>o
O
O
O
PJ
-0
SEP
jS79
-------
o
s: as t> H;
* o> r> M
o
i t .T) z
z
X E« CB
HI HI 11 H
HI HI -«1 PI
I I "O
O O X
» » o n
* V * O
£ £ X O
a -A Z PI
« e/i
t» a> x ~
*q PI -I
PI D I
50 50
FJ "O
»» TO
:£") O
J» C en
59 z -o
o a n
HI n
Z H
OM
n
o
a
o
c.
i PI
i n
a H
n n en
o HI
3B G O
0 50 Z
c* z
HI o
PI 11
s: a
H. O
O TJ C/>
o ro o
an 02
n z z n
co o
*» HI I
T> 3 01
O 01
P1 «
z
l-i
o «) a
o 50
o v M
9 H
o -a <
t, w
O HI HI
H M cn
HI H]
o
Z
CO
n
tii
O «) S
f CHI
O Z HI
0> O -X
w n o
3 O 30
I »
a TJ s
C 50 2
-1 O
d «!
o « a
»o o
O H 2
c.
m "o
n w
^ M
o
»
HI
01
K)
-J
ot
O X
fl O PI
HI 3» CO 53
" M * HI
HI 2C
a *
CO Z
93 O
O PI Q
O 93 ,T Z
33 > O (A
Z 90 HI
50 HI ^50
P3 C
Of n
« O HI
to C O
-i Z Z
HI
O HI
^ O
HI
O t*
9C f
a
o r>
n o
O en
HI HI
O -o
O t>
f 50
HI O
n *:
> PI
HI O
HI
Of
z 3;
PI
HI Z
z o
I 3T
SCP1
o z
C HI
cn
PI
o
o >
o r»
PJ HJ
M
*» O
ca
HJ
SEP 1979
-------
K * -O H
>» O3 O M
« O
f I 1} Z
n
50
Z
H
tn 5
-i r
-1 i-J *«1 P!
X X "D
O CJ X
50 50 n n
* *» O
£ £ X O
Z 3 2; PI
(A
* n> x
*i PJ *
i-i -"I
1*1 O I
TO 50
PI -O
» TO
s: ») o
*» s t/>
50 Z -O
O O M
M o
z ^
O M
<
W
o
o
«i y o
O Ci
r> -o
O 50
o ct
M X
fc.
o
o
z
X>
3t
P!
o n
x =: o
O 50 Z
C1 Z
rn pi TJ
1-5 O TO
P) «-«
O -fl O
O 50
O 50 M
5D H
o -n <
Ci Pi
n < f
o »-< w
l=J Ol CO
W 1^
o
z
Ol
"I -^ S
r> -c x
iii
,O ] Z
r1 c M
D 2 «-J
Ol O X
W M O
O O »
I >
O TJ £
C 50 Z
H a
o -q
o m »
50 O O
a H 3
Ci
PJ "O
O 50
-J M
o
K
t"
o -
O
« *
* s
KJ
oe>
«
c/i
o
0>
X» 50
500
a
PI O
* >»
* -H
" Pi
CI
O 50
50 >
. z
50 ^
p:
O f
C 3.
PI O
t/< c
-J Z
-3
TJ j,
5C C*
a
c. r>
w o
o tn
-J -J
G
Cn
>» PI
HO
Z 36
^- o .
I 3E
a: P;
o ~z
C H
en
o >
o r>
P: n
M
>> o
z z
o
Cn
o »-:
5" W
M -C
P!
SEP 1979
-------
State of Wi scpnisj n
DIVISi:',': Air & Hazardous Materials
DD^' " .. Pesticides
Ai^do'-'zir,g Sec. iO'VL--,.': Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
0:,-tv ^- ".;;-, rd: September 21, 1979
$178,431
Feceral Grant An,-.- : $151,669
(Actual or propos^
Brief cesc.-^ptK' : " . ret -.; " : ~
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is the the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7, 8
& 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
-------
State of _W]'scmTs_i_n
[)]"<-,; ;-. Air & Hazardous Materials
3;,. ; Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), FIFRA, as amended
"' -.^"d: 6/29/79
$97,330
$39,629
Provide funds to supplement costs of state pesticide applicator certification
program during FY 79.
-------
*
Stats of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRAIIOI: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation *rid Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
*
eT lAcUiaJ_or anticipated; May 23, 1970
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or preposed) $400,0]0
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actuaj_or proposed) $234,690
Brief description of project or program'covered: This gran* is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized ha2ardour ,va;;te management
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3J06 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the (1. S. r'nvironmentdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these finds to operate the program ir that State. Some i
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment;
legal and" regulatory development; permit and manifest system .'envelopment; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation; :
abandoned site and emergency response proyTa.ns. v
"INSTRUCTIONS: '
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program c, :Pts, active I
o rounder c o n side ration, within that St-.ntL' (include grants ic r.ijte cii-j'.'rci'js, p
TtjcaT"rigen"cies, planTrTng agsnci;os, otharj) . h
' I*
2. To n.Qt include FY 19SO program grants or construction gr,.ts. |
3. Treat each si.'ppltTsntal req'.^S'C scpncatvly.
-------
State of 1','isccnji
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division !
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch <
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Consecution -if'd Recovery '-.-
Act of 1976 (RCRA) :
Oate of Award: ;
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979 .
Total Project Cost: ?
(Actual or proposed) $999,995 . :
Fedora? Grant Amount: f
(ActuaT_ or proposed) $228,600 f
f
Brief description of project or pronrmr covered: This grant is awarded to supportf
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr1'rtiria, and development1.
of Stale Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulat-vns mandated by See- !
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th-i regjla-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These piannirj requirements include,'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste riianageme.it agencies at all !
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authorities ov.jr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inipsJimerits to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi.ig permits.---
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all proj'or: or rro.'ran ,r i:it.s, z<.<:nc
or^ u n do r c o n s i de ra t i o n, within that Stats (include grafts to Mote £-j..;nr in.5,
"local ac^ncres, pTanrTfrTg agencies, others)
*
2. Do not, include FY 1930 pro'jiMrr. grants or
3. Treat each supplemental r^cjuest separately
-------
.. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS At!D/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin--Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do HOJL include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
------- |