-------
State Ohio. -. IV l
Division Water Divison..... __
Water Supply Bran
Branch
Date April 3, 1979
USE?A - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion, of this Form:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attantic
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE,'a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the I.rvOLVEI
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indie:
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Summary of Issue:
EPA has spent considerable resources in developing the Model State
Information System for use by the Regions and the States in handling
public water system data. As with most new data systems, the MSIS is
beset by intsrpretational and programming errors and anamolies which
make it difficult to use at present. Region V's Water Supply Branch is
striving to implement MSIS for use on Indiana water system data.
Background:
MSIS inventory has long been considered usaable. Recent outputs,
however, indicate that an edit is necessary. This edit will be initi-
ated state by state, as soon as the Federal Reporting Data System input
(which ties directly to MSIS) is completed. MSIS compliance programs
have not been operated successfully in Region V.
Perception on Issue:
Headquarters has accepted contractor product which has many programming
errors in definition and which is often inefficient and difficult to
use. Correction of this programming has been unnecessarily prolonged by
marriage to the contractor product.
Involved Characters:
Headquarters, Other Regions, Region V, and the States.
Update:
All Indiana data for the first quarter of FY 79 has been edited and
corrected. January and February data are now being coded, edited, and
corrected. A portion of Wisconsin's "front-end" entry procedures were'
found to have potential in Region V's use of MSIS. The Headquarters'
"correction package" for MSIS operations still has bugs being worked
out. Front-end edits to the compliance program for FRDS have proven
unnecessarily bulky and time-consuming. Efforts to make FRDS and MSIS
compliance useable are continuing.
-------
State OHIO OH IV U
Division Water
Erinch Water Quality Mgt.
January 1980
Instructions far Cs— pletion o
Please use the folleving format co surr.arize special problems requiring attention
Include a description 3 ;rrr..?. rising the 15 5'JZ , 3. sacticr. prcvidir.g the BAC^GRCUITT'
en the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and 3. section on the I}~'OLVZD
CAST OF CHAPJ--CT"?.S--all publics concerned or involved wi;h the issue. As nev
information develops, ether problems arisa. or perceptions change, please indicat;
this in the zonthlv update on this issua.
- Additional funding for the Eastgate Development and Transportation
Agency (EDATA). Executive Director William Fergus claims that there has
been unnecessary delay in our grant award.
UPDATE
issue resolved, grant offered June 29, 1979, and accepted September 18, 1979
This is the last update on this issue. (1/10/80)
J.™
-------
State Ohio IV 15
Division Air & Hazardous Mat' Is
Branch Air Programs
y 4,
USE? A - RZGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Fora:
Please use the following foraat to sunaariza special problaas requiring attention:
Include a description sussarizing the ISSUS, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on tha p rob lea, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a. section en the DEVOLVED
CAST OF* CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with tha issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Butler County (Ohio) S02 Regulations
ISSUE - Region V needs to repropose the S02 regulations in Butler County due to
erroneous data submitted to EPA through the section 114 mechanism. A
number of sub-issues are also involved:
- In setting emission limits for a State, can EPA reserve the PSD
increment, for the State's administration of the PSD program.? . -
- In developing emissions limits based on a modeling analysis, are
receptors located on plant property considered in the definition of
ambient air?
Several companies have joined with the Middletown Chamber- of Commerce
in requesting Environmental Research, Inc. (ERT) to conduct an ambient
sulfur -dioxide monitoring study in Butler County, Ohio. On December 13, •-.,
]979y EBT-.submitted, a -revised, draft monitoring plan.. This plan was approved
'with' conditions'. Notification was sent on January 25, 1980. . -'•"•
A PSD permit "was .issued to Miller Brewing, Butler County, on ...
X September 13, 1979. ' -'
Note, the Ohio EPA plan for Butler County contains. only a few minor deficiency
If Ohio EPA can resolve these points, then Region V will approve this portion
of the Ohio EPA Plan.:
FEB
-------
IV If,
State Ohio
Division A&HMD
Branch Pesticides
Date June 6,1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE: Probable denial of pesticide use enforcement primacy
for the State of Ohio.
BACKGROUND: The Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) indicated in February that
it would provide only limited support for the Agency's 2,4,5-T and
Silvex Emergency Suspension Orders. Consequently, EPA Headquarters
determined that this posture warrants denial of enforcement primacy.
The Region V Office formally disagreed with this determination.
As of June 1, 1979, the Administrator is reviewing a letter to
, the ODA denying enforcement primacy. He is expected to concur.
A cover memo stating the Regional position is also under review.
A decision to deny enforcement primacy could have significant
impact on all pesticide program interactions between EPA and ODA.
Furthermore, such a decision could impact our projected resource
needs for FY 1980.
INVOLVED CAST
OF CHARACTERS: EPA Headquarters
EPA Region V
Ohio Dept. of Agriculture.
JUN
-------
USEPA. - SCION V'- SPECIAL Z.SSUZ3
ts on this issue.
,.., '^^SStiE :-v3dbie pcib^':p^rJPotiilancebf the aortheaat Ohio Pour County Development and
' ' >./^'.'3^inihQ.Otgar,i3ati0n'''{yBFCO} ,in water 'quality managexent plaroiing has aade
•• ,';-;^tit1±teE ^itect funding imdesir ©able, • • - '
sage; in^sovintability,.or lestflts'JLs needed.'
I;*&!&surd&fi-'^t;^: 1:,'"' ••'•:-'.',..',.
pgg|,f$ii;f 'v ;.:
aiiflSMi%feKiiia> i|:i&4iwC'-Jrfer«lV«U. 'tllSrt-(:Krt "t>j /»««5«^JltK». t/iia'i *'''•
m^^/^m^mm^^^^j^m^ -; -.
::;•;,;,
^iferaaaa|pr^ ^^^^ayet^^;^;^, ;^ y,
-------
OHIO _ OH IV 18
.Water...
Water Quality JMgt
December 1979
ISSUE - Additional funding for the Eastgate Development and Transportation
Agency (EDATA). Executive Director William Fergus claims that there has
been unnecessary delay in our grant award.
BACKGROUND - The funding plan for FY 1978 Water Quality Management grant
funds calls for the award of $99,630 to EDATA. Delay has been caused due
to conflict between OEPA and EDATA. We have withheld the grant in
support of OEPA and their implementation of a joint supplemental agreement
(JSA) with EDATA. We do not want to make the award over the State's
objection unless absolutly necessary. Further, the JSA is incorporated
as conditions in Region V's approval of EDATA1s plan. EDATA1s grant is
now being processed.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTER
Eastgate Transportation and Development Agency (EDATA), William Fergus,
Executive Director
OEPA, Carl Wilhelm, Planning Coordinator
USEPA, Water Division
UPDATE
The differences between EDATA and the OEPA were minor and readily resolved.
EDATA accepted a new grant received on June 26, 1979. However, EDATA did
protest to Region V and Headquarters concerning their desire to utilize
local funds spent in the past (above and beyond what was spent to match
water quality management planning grants) against future Federal monies.
We are prohibited from allowing any local matching funds except those
directly applied to current work. EDATA1s approach to Headquarters did
not result in any changes in USEPA1s position. EDATA is currently
projected to receive a grant offer for $82,050 in Federal dollars under
FY 1979 208 funding. EDATA accepted USEPA1s FY 1979 grant offer of
$82,050 on 9/18/79. (12/4/79)
-------
IV 19
State Ohio
Division Water
Branch Facilities Planning
Date June 5, 1979
USEPA-REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form.
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:.
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS—all public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
ISSUE
Resolution of outstanding issues and completion of Columbus EIS.
BACKGROUND
The EIS has been completed and is presently being printed. All outstanding
issues, particularly those previously highlighted (intercepting sewers, pre-
treatment and plant design criteria) have been addressed to the satisfaction
of the Agency.
Upon acceptance by the City of Columbus, the Agency will be able to give
final approval of the facilities planning effort and consider several
expected Step 2 and 3 applications.
JUN
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Oh1°
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law:Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 6/1/80
(ActuaLor anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $538,393
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $457,634
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
This grant, when approved, will be to the Ohio Department of Agriculture to
(1) enforce Sections 7 ,8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement
program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry
and user groups.
A draft grant application was received on May 2, 1980. The application is
under review and comments appear favorable. ARegional Pesticide Enforcement
Grant Selection panel will be convened for final approval upon completion
of review.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AN'D/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,849
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 5117,637
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting
of incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards
contributed to the interest in resource recovery) are all being
considered as project development options for the Dayton area. Project
efforts are focusing on market development. EPA has approved extension
of the project period.
-------
STAT'JS "EP^T - T/-T3 AND/C? :?V!T APPLICATIONS
State or" Oh\o--'Iontgonery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous fateH-rils Division
3RANCH: Waste Management "ranch
Authoriz'ng Section/Law: 40Q8(a)(2j/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
2ate of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,3-19
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Arcojnt: SI 17,537
(Actual or proposed)
Population served:
Brief description o* project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of •'ncinera-
tors (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed to the interest
in resource recovery) ara all being considered as project development options for
the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and public
participation are the principal activities to be supported under this cooperative
agreement.
A general consultant is being hired. The City of Cayton has agreed to go along
with the project until actual costs are determined. Several potential markets
have surfaced.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio--Cuhahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Expected tonnage: 2,000-3,000 TPD
Brief description of project or program covered:
Cuyahoga County's cooperative agreement for $248,786 covers Phase II,
procurement activities, of a study to determine the feasibility of a
2,000-3,000 tpd resource recovery facility to serve Cleveland and
supply steam energy to a major industrial complex. The Cooperative
Agreement project period has been extended to August 31, 1980. The
County has requested assistance from the TA Panels contractor to
conduct a source separation study. A draft workscope for Phase III
will be submitted by the County by the end of May.
-------
ST;
1: c D r: o o D
AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISITI: Air and Hazardous '''atarials Division
BRANCH: vlaste tfanageTient Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003 (a)(1); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1975 (RCRA)
Data of Award:
(-ctual or anticipated^
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
Pending indirect rate determination
1,230,000 (proposed)
519,913 (proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must -ieet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements "'nclude: the formal identification o~
responsible solid waste management agencies ar all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal imoediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AfiD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH:
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Anount:
(Actual or proposed)
577,000 (proposed)
533,251 (proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by
Section 3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific
time, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the
program in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature
include: resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and
manifest system development; expansion of surveillance and enforcement programs;
public participation; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
MAR
-------
STATUS RSIPORT - G^V'ITS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of 0hi o —-C11yahoga Coimt y
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1970
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $243,786
(Actual or proposed)
Expected tonnage: 2,000-3,000 Tpn
Population served:
Brief description of project or program covered:
Cuyahoga County's cooperative agreenent for $248,786 covers Phase II, procurement
activities, of a study to determine the feasibility of a 2,000-3,000 tpd resource
recovery facility to serve Cleveland and supply steam energy to a major industrial
complex.
The County has identified a project manager and hired a consultant. The consultant
and the County have begun preliminary work in several areas, including public partici-
pation. <\n extension of the cooperative agreement from June 30, 1980, to August 31,
1980, is being processed. A grant amendment to fund a source separation study is
being considered.
MAR 1990
-------
STATUS REPCHT - GR.-VITS AND/OR GRA'iT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohi o--Montgcp;ery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual Or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,349
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637
(Actual or proposed)
Population served:
Brief description of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of incinera-
tors (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed to the interest
in resource recovery) are all being considered as nroject development options for
the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and public
participation are the principal activities to be supported under this cooperative
agreement.
A general consultant is being hired. The City of Dayton has agreed to go along
with the project until actual costs are determined. Several potential markets
have surfaced.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Jhio--Toledo "etropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $157,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $117,714
(Actual or proposed)
Population served: 534,000
Brief description of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to process
1,000-1,500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will support
existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a full-service
vendor.
A consultant has been selected for the project and a contract signed. The antici-
pated energy market has withdrawn from project and therefore, a new marketing scheme
is currently being investigated. Ten month initial phase anticipated.
MAR
1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section ^008 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1975 (RCRA)
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 1,230,000 (proposed)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 619,913 (proposed)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
NEIC representatives inspected the OHDA laboratory facilities on February 4,
1980. Results of this inspection have been transmitted to Region V for
review.
EPA and OHDA are discussing the possibilities of developing a non-primacy
use enforcement agreement which would address marketplace and producer
establishment inspections and sample collection.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS UEPQP.T - GRANTS AMU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . •
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Lavr. 4C03(a)(2)/Resourca Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $156,849 • • ' .
(Actual or proposed) •
•
Federal Grant Amount: 5117,637 .
(Actual or proposed)
•
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this cooperative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
\. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, viithin that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"local agencies, "planning agencies, others) - .
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants cr construction grants.
v
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GPA'iTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BRA',CH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(«ctusl or anticipated)
Project Cose:
(/'.ct^sl or proposed)
Federal Grant Amci — $121,253
(Actual or propose;
Brief description o.- project or program covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANDAOR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—•Cuyahoga County . i
DIVISION: Air and Hazardgus Materials Division ;
i
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act * \
\
Date of Award: August 2, 1979 . " " I
(Actual or anticipated) . t
*
Total Project Cost: $331,714 •
(Actual or proposed) J
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786 l
(Actual or proposed) • |
i
Brief description of project or prograw covered: !
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to Stats agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
1S30
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio-Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION; Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law. 4003(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 3155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 5116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals' for_an energy recovery facility to
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agancies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do'joal Include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
•
State of Oh1°
DIYISIG": Air and Hazardous Materials Division
• BRANCH: Waste Managenient Branch " '
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservative and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
>* (Actual or anticipated) Jan. 1, 1980
Total Project Cost: 577,000
or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Acfrjfr} or proposed) 533,251
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste monajenient
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Huvironntent-il Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; 1s-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development.; jxpancion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic'.patio1.; abandons J site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCT I OWS: '. ' '
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or p'ogra;n c ntr., dc.-'ve
or ur.tier consideration, within that State (include grants to '>tuts a-j-'i-cr.
Vocal s^sncics, pianning agencies, others)
2. Do jini .include Ff 19SQ program grints or. constn-.ctio^ g:.. .ti.
3. Treat each supplemental request s
-------
.
State of Ohio _ ;
•v •
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division *
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch • •
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4QOS(a}(I); Resource Conservation ind Rcco/ery'-
Act of 1976 (RCRA) :
Date of Award: . \
(Actual or anticipated) Jan. 1, 1980 - •:
Total Project Cost: nnn
•C&tiaal or proposed) 1.230,000
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual. cr proposed)
Brief description of project or program' covers •!: This gran', is awa»-dej to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federo: criteria, ard
development of State Solid k'aste Management Plr-ns, as dofined fn regu' atior.s man-
datad by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain plotnvinq '•sqi.ir.'nient^ in
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding. Th»:-- piantr.ng require-
ments include: the formal identification of recponsihle solid ..asze nv.na jen.ent
agencies at e.ll levels of government; development of le-jai arv, regulator/ authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal cri ten's; rerni/ai of f.er'cain legal
impediirents ta resource recovery; and planning for adequate r.cility r.apicity, if
funding permits.
IKSTRUCTIOMS:
1. Templets forms, by State, for all projc-rt or pro-jra1^ ^"-nts,
or ^ : tig r c on s i ci e r a t i c n , w i t h i n that State (include chants Ic r-i:?.ce
local i»noncfss , pi anm no ocancies, others)
2. Co no! include FY K-30 program grants or ro'istn-rhon c.r.-'t:.
3. Treat each supplemental request ss
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/KW GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—Cyyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 2, 1979 . *
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or progranr covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants-.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
"Cl
> * *
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials .Division
• ' ' '
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch ...
* J
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) ."
Total Project Cost: $156,849' . • '. . '
(Actual or proposed) ' : -
» /
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637 . -." . .
(Actual or proposed)
' •
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and. the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emiss/ipri standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this coooerative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
V
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio-Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division •
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
1
Total Project Cost: $155,510 .
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633 -
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals- for_an energy recovery facility to
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do'jisl Include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
Df
-------
C-I . • ': -')', . •" I , • ,'• i > . j
. ._...... . ^
St.ai-.c- of ohi°
DIVISION Air & Hazardous Materials
r.iV-'n;- Pesticides
Aphorizing S-.ction/«..-/: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
D^lsc of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of projsct or program covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forr.s, by State, for all project cr program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencies
local agenci es , pi anni ng agencies, others)
•_.*f'~- ~ - r- —
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
V
IV A 1
STATUS REPORT - GFlAii I'S /uiD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
' State of Chl0' To1edo
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a-gencies, plannfng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. •
JUL
-------
V
IV A 2
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR CRAJiT AMPUTATIONS
State of Ohio; Steufcennlle
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials DivisrKM
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Reivn A.;r Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program cove rni;;
Monitoring support provided by the 'Steuberv.Ute. agsncy for a
special Harvard University indoor/outdoor rror,5torfng and health study.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all projector p rag nil grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (-Vfilu-de grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately-.
JUL
-------
\
IV A 3
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, St.oubenvilVG
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $328 472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) . ?
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration., within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. •
JUL
-------
IV A 4
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Portsmouth
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division • . .
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $197,400
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,900 ' .-
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
\
IV A 5
• STATUS REPORT -.GRANTS AND/OR.GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Cleveland
DIVISION: /\ir and Hazardous Materials Division
\
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: February 23, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) J
Total Project Cost: $1,446,305
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: *,-r, 71I-
(Actual or proposed) *ooi,/ia
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention- and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do riot, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
' JUL
-------
IV A 6
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS'
State of Ohio, Cincinnati
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
(Actual or'proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:. $685,407
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
\
IV A 7
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Canton
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 16, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $291,601
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $148,133
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention, and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, "planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. .
JUL
-------
" IV A 8
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATions
• State of Ohi0' Akron
DIVISION: Ajr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $222,997
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY I960 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. •
JUL
-------
IV A 9
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,094,950
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $473,297
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary" and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
prjjnder consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do .npl include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. .
JUL
-------
IV A' 10
STATUS.REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mansf 1 eld-R1 ^Inmjj^m^fy^
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division • . .
'BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation .of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agenciesv others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
J.J-, iv A 1
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mahoni ng-Trumbu1_1 Count 1 es
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $217 516
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $132 228 -• ' .
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do .not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
IV A 12
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATION'S,
State of Ohio, Lake County
DIVISION: /\-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Divisic^
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the (Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,584
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covers-ir.
To assist local agency in carrying out its rolle tin the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control! if air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all proje^ct or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, jf!arming agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. •
JUL
-------
IV A 1
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of
Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 15. 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
/•«.-, _i\
(Actual-or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
/ * . -i j\
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To Assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, viithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies," planning agencies, others)
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately. •
JUL
-------
IV A 1
•
i
.4
i
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS'AND/OR GRA[;1JJ\PPLICATION$
State of Ohio '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous'Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticide'Branch • •
Authorizing Section/Law: >IFRA Sec: 23(a)
Date of Award: Cannot be anticipated
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: Grant application has not been received.
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: See above.
(Actual or proposed) . •
Brief description or project or program covered:
Draft Cooperative Enforcement Agreement has been sent to Regional Counsel for
legal review (7/5/79). '' • " .
JUL
-------
IV A 15
\
DIVISION:
BRANCH:
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
Air and Hazardous Materials
Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: 6/14/79
(Actua.1 or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $132,947
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $26,833
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved state plan under section 4(a)(2)
of FIFRA, as emended. The state-administered applicator training programs
which support the certification program are not funded out of the cost enumer-
ated above.
JUL
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS » 16
State of OHIO - NOACA
DIVISION: WATER
BRANCH: Water Quality Management'Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cwA-208"
Date of Award: 9-1-1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 290-°
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) 140*8
Brief description of project or program" covered:
FY 1980 Water Quality Work Program Description of water quality-
projects to be undertaken by NOACA during FY 1980
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 17
State of OHIO - EDATA _
DIVISION:
BRANCH: water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: CWA 208
Date of Award: ' 9-1-1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 132*b
Federal Grant Amount: _ .
(Actual or proposed) *
Brief description of project or program' covered:
208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning - Continuing Planning
Process.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not., include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
1S
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 13
488
State of Ohio OKI
DIVISION: . Water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: CWA 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: IQS.O
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 58.5
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-" covered:
Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or'program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS' 455
State of Ohio - MVRPC
DIVISION: . water
BRANCH: Water Management Quality Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cw* 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: go.o •
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program'covered:
FY-1980 Continuation funding for Section 208 (PL 95-21F) Water Quality Managen
Planning in the Miami Valley Region
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
20
S; REPORT GP.AMTS AMO/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - CUYAHOGA COUNTY
AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
,i
,**
.-, BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
I
"' Author!? t.ig Section/Law: 4008 (a)[2)/RCRA
Date of /-"ward: September 1, 1979
(Actual
-------
4r 9 •
BMK £ -
"1*' '"'* t- A. Ju
R GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - TOLEDO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
DIVISION- AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
Authoring Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of i^ard: September 15, 1979
(Actual !)- anticipated;
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual o- proposed)
Federal G^ant Amount: $116,633
(Actual o" proposed)
Brief des:riptiori of project or program covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery
facility to process 100-1500 tpd from the Toledo area.
This cooperative agreement will support existing system analysis,
project management, and selection of a full service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
idcaT"T(;3ncles"r^"ranni"ng agencies, others)
2. Do r.jt include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 19'
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of OHIO - MONTGOMERY COUNTY
DIVISION: AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $160,000
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Resource recovery efforts spanning several years are once again Unsettled
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to complywith air erafiission standards
contributed to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered
as project development options for the Dayton area.
The major remaining obstacle in negotiations between Montgomery County and
USEPA is the County's desire to bid for and hire a full service contractor
a strategy which USEPA regards as very premature.
Montgomery County has been designated an "exempted project" by headquarters,
as a result of its complexity and budgetary magnitude. Therefore, headquarters
reserves the right to approve the budget, workscope and ceiling of this
INSTRUCTIONS: coonerative agreement.
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, activa
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 19'
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
*
DIVISION:
23
Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRANCH:
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law:
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
or proposed)
Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery -
Act of 1976 (RCRA) \
I
July 23, 1979 i
i
$856,643
$246,408 ($551,000 allocated)
Brief description of project or program-'covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal criteria, and
development of State Solid Haste Management Plans, as defined in regulations man-
dated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding. These planning require-
ments include: the formal identification of responsible solid waste management
agencies at all levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal
impediments to resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if
funding permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants tc State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
•
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1379
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of ohi°
*
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $226,814
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated)
Brief description of project or program-' covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; expansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation; abandoned site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to Stata agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
*
2. Do nai. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 197?
-------
25
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANID/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio __.
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticide Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide,
Act, as amended, Section 23(a)
Date of Award: cannot be anticipated
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: Grant application has not been received
(Aetna ' or proposed/
Federal Grant AmQij'"1": see above
(Actual or propose-:'-
Brief description cr project or program covered:
Regional Counsel has completed review of proposed agreement. Pesticide
Branch has not received these changes as of 8/3/79.
AUG
-------
23
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/14/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $132,947
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $26,833
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator
certification program in accordance with the EPA approved State
Plan under section 4(a)(2) of FIFRA, as amended. The state-administered
applicator training programs which support the certification program
are not funded out of costs enumerated above.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Late - August 1979.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $267,900.
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $267,900.
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
School Boiler Inventory
Review of Stack of Fuel Sampling Regulations
Safety and Wiring Update
Assistance for Dispersion Modeling
Air Monitoring and Audio Visual Equipment .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 23
• State of Ohi0' To1edo
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie:
local agencies," planning agencies, others)
2.. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - C.RANTj_A!ID/OR GRANT A_P_PL I CAT IONS. 2 9
• State of Ohio; Steubenvi'Tle
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: too onc .- :"
/« . ^ -J\ .p£-t- jUVJJ
(Actual or proposed)
. . >»
B * •
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Monitoring support provided by the Steubenville agency for a
special Harvard ' University indoor/outdoor monitoring and health study.
I
1 INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all'project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencie
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
30
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRfrNT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Steubenville
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air-Programs Branch
• »
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $328,472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) ?
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention,and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thln that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, "planning agencies, others)
2. Do jLQi include FY 1980 program grants or construction grant's.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 31
State of Ohio, Portsmouth
DIVISION: Air ancj Hazardous Materials Division
i BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
; Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 197a
(Actual or anticipated)
j Total Project Cost: $197,400
; (Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,900
(Actual or proposed)
•*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
I To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
i Implementation Plan -for prevention and control of.air pollution and
j implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
I _ t
i
1
j
INSTRUCTIONS: ' .'
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State- (include grants to State agencies,
Toe a1 a ge n c i e s, planning agencies, others)
-''
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
•
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS.
State Of Ohio, Cleveland
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' 1
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
February 23, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual' or proposed)
$1,446,305
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$551,715'
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards,
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
>
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
j ' - . STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR^GRAiiT _APPi:iCATIOnS 33
\ State of Ohio> Cincinnati .
' ~
™ DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
j BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
j Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
{Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $685,407
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role, in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
.]
?
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)-
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS. A'l_P/.Cg_GRANT L APPLICATION
• State of Ohio, Car.ton _
DIVISION: /\jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
* •
BRANCH: Air, Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: '
(Actual o'r anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual- or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
March 16, 1979
$291,601
$148,133 .-
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
'local a.gencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
,
"4
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS, 0_
. • a 3
State of
Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $3 461 353
(Actual or proposed) ' '
Federal Grant Amount: $750,000
(Actual or proposed) _ -
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
J INSTRUCTIONS
I 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
I ' or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
-j local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
- STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Lake County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Diviri£»a
BRANCH: Air Programs 'Branch
*
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the; CD-ess Air /vet
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,584
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered!:-
To assist local agency in carrying out its rcil.-s: Tr.it the dp/proved State
Implementation Plan for prevention^ and control &$ air p-rllfution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Kir Quality Standards.
/
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project er program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencie
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
,1
•\ ' 2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio, Mahoning-Trumbull Counties
DIVISION: y\-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
"I
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $217> 516
(Actual or proposed) . :
Federal Grant Amount: $132 228
(Actual or proposed) • ?
•
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vnthin that State (include grants to State agencie.'
local agencTesT~p'»2nnin9 agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1!
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRAI1TS AND/OR GRAUT APPLICATIONS.
State of Ohio, Mansfiold-Ricbland County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: -Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
May 17, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
$54,127
Federal Gran tr Amount:
.(Actual or proposed)
'$33,252
»*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation.PI an for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: . .'
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State-(include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
• State of Oirk), Montgomery County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH:
Air Programs 'Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$1,094,950
$473,297
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality-Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vn'thin that State (include grants to State agencie;
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
• .STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRA?1T APPLICATIONS 4-3
State of Ohl0' Akron •
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divis-i'orr
• <*•
1,
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Cte-ot' Air tfct
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .<,
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
! Federal Grant Amount: $222,997
(Actual or--proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered!:
To assist local agency in carrying out its r©l£ in the approved State
Implementation Plan for preventioa and contra?. sfr air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secooiarg* Afr Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project! or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (wcTude1 grants to State agencie
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
>
3. Treat each supplemental request separately/-
j ' . AUG
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
• *•
State of Ohio—Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management -Branch -
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to
process 100-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
- full-service vendor.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or jjnde_r consideration„ viithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, pTanhirfg agencies, others)
2. Do nol include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of Ohio--Cuyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . -'•.
i.?z
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20; 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: , $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program'covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a. major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
6r under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
locaT agencies, pTanmTng agencies, others)
2. Do noJL include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio^-^'ontgomerv County
DIVISION'. Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008 (a) (2) /Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date "of Award: September 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: _ $155,300
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126,386
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-' covered:
Resource recovery efforts spanning several years are once again unsettled.
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emission standards contributed
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project
development options for the Dayton area.
The major remaining obstacle in negotiations between Montgomery County and
USEPA is the County's desire to bid for and hire a full service contractor,
a strategy which USEPA regards as very premature.
Montgomery County has been designated an "exempted project" by headquarters,
as a result of its complexity and budgetary magnitude. Therefore, headquarters
reserves the right to approve the budget, workscope, and ceiling of this
eTa±ive (..agreement.
6
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under c_on si deration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
loca~l agencies, pTarmTng agencies, others)
?., Do no! include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
Ohio
DIYISIu';: Air and Hazardous Materials
" • Pesticides
Authorizi'ia Section/La,-,: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/21/79
Tote' 3~jict Cost^ $133,420
•"- $26,833
Administration and maintenance of the Ohio pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved State Plan under section 4 of
the FIFRA.
-------
STATUS REPOPF
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Late - August 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $267,90-0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $267,900
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
School Boiler Inventory
Review of Stack of Fuel Sampling Regulations
Safety and Wiring Update
Assistance for Dispersion Modeling
Air Monitoring and Audio Visual Equipment •
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete, forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
_or un^ej^ccns^d£ratT_on, within that State (include grants to State agencies
Toca"T~agenc"ieTri^TnnTng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
• State of _ Gil^> JL^lll>ci'.'i"LL]c-'_
DIVISION': Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 'of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: ' March 8, 3979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $22,805
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
-------
of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Kdteria Is Division
BRANCH: Air Prograns Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: Mid-AUgust 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $434,064
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $198,494
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTIONS: ' •
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
9~rjjnjdDr_ consideration, v.'ithin that State (include ('rants to Store ngencii
local agencies, p]?.;:;ri7>3 agencies, others)
2.. Do jio_t include FY 1980 prcgrcrn grants or construction grants.
i
3. Trc-at each supplemental request separately.
-------
Stale of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lavr. Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $197,400
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $126?900
(Actual or proposed) ' .
»*
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
impleraentstion of national Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: ' .'
1. Complete forris, by State, for all project or program grants, activ-
orjjnder consideration, v.'ithin that State- (include grants to Sidle ager,c/
Tocal "agencies, plUTuTTiTg agencies, others)
2. Di .not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of Oh KJ , St oub."!iv i l_lp_
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' .
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 8, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $323,472
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $210 472
(Actual or proposed) ?'
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention, and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
, '-. 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
] or under consideration, v.nthin that State (include grants to State ngencie
| Tocfal 'ogencfeTY plenhTng agencies, others)
1
2. Do .not include FY 19CD program, grants or construction granLs.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of t''ni°> Mr.hon. ii/j-TrumUil 1 CounLios
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 5, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)_
Total Project Cost: $217? 516
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $122 228
(Actual or proposed) • ?
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implenisntaticr, of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
.
I
1 ^ INSTRUCTIONS:
1, Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active;
or under considerati on, vithin that State (include grants to State anencv
"local" age?icicfs7 pITnTTirTg agencies, oth&rs)
x
2. Do not. include FY 1930 prograr.i grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
C' l-
Statc of Ohio, Mansf ic 10 •.•.!; iiJQjij.UL Counb/__
DIVISION: /\-jr an(;S Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
May 17, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
$54,127
Federal Grant Amount:
.-(Actual or proposed)
'$33,252
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of a'ir pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: . . .'
1. Complete forms, by Slate, for all project or program grants, active
PL^yD^L^-^^l^^^J-A^fli. v'"' -^n ^iat State-(include grants to State anenci
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
X
2. CD .not include FY 1900 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of 0; i i o ,_j b.'i t gom:- ry__ Cj!_un 1 y_
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lew: Section 105 of the Clean-Air Act
Date of Award: - February 28, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,094,950
(Actual, or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $473,297
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State (include grants to Slate anencic
local a g e n c" i e~s,~p"1 ennTn~g agencies, others)
2. Do jiot. include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divisor;-
\
BRANCH: 7\ir Programs Branch ' ;
Authorizing Secti on/Lav,1 : Section 105 of the' C.V.cfin- Air Act
Date of Award: April 30, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $420,984
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $222,997 ___ '
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program coverec;':
To assist local agency in carrying out its r;c?,e i"n tlv* sparcved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and contra"; :ufr air pc'Uut^on end
implementation of National Primary and Secon^irv- Ai'r Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all pro>'Ac;t or pra-gram grants, r.ctive
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (iincTude grants to State agencies
Tocal agencies, pl"annTng agencies, others)
2. Do jnp_t include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
»
3. Treat each supplemental request separatT-liy^
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous !-',aU>rials Division
BRANCH: Air, Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clsavi Air Act
Date of Av;ard:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
March 16, 1979
$291,601
$148,133 .
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying cut its role in the Dporoveci State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of a^r p-/notion and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards. .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or_under consideration, vrithin that State (include era tits to State r.cencv
local agencies, "pTalmTng agencies, others)
2. Do jiot include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
• -
i State of
'
DIVISION: /\-jr Qncj Hazardous Kotcrials Division
j BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
••j Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 105 of the Clean Air "Act
Date of Award: . May 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $1,401,747
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $685,407
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local aqency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
impleroentatiin of national Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by Stats, for all project or program grants, active
or u n d e r con si dor a. t i o n, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a e, e n c i es~,~p~lli :Tn fii 3 agencies, others)-
2. Do not, include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
...:LJiQJ_C)iiI_i_.t;£1DJ?.. A'£/c:\.GJ^I'LA-';'i-J_fl-!iU.cl:.:3.
State of Ohio, Clcvjljirid
DIVISION: /\-jr arid Hazardous Materials Division
1 t
BRANCH: .Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav/: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
February 23, 1979
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual' or proposed.)
$1,146,305
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed)
$551,715'
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention cine ccr.trol of air pollution and
inplemeritatic": of National Primary and Secondary Air Quail ly' Standards.
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vithin th?t State (include grants to State aoer.ci>
local"Iig£~ncfes ,~~pY27irrThg agencies, others)
2. Do .not, include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
\
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Diviriir,
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ' ._
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the1 Ox^ JVir net
Date of Award: April 26, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $124,594
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $75,534
(Actual or proposed)
--
Brief description, of project or program covera-
To assist local aqency in carrying out its rol-f ""in tbs ..'{"-proved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control c..r a.i;~ p'/fifution end.
Implementc-tlon of National Primary and Secondary Air Qua 1 ity Standards.
i
IHSTRUCT!C;;S:
1. Complete forms, by State> for all project cr procram grants, active
^^iL^L^lsJ^^D'l^liiLLL within that State (includV: grants to State agencie:
'IdcaT agencies,~planTTing agencies, others)
2. Do jiot include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATIC p.r.pG:;.7_
• State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: March 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: <•-> /r,-| ->r,o
/„ ., ,\ •iOj'rUj.sJj^)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $750,000
• (Actual or proposed)
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist Stc.ie in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention end control of air
pollution and ip.Dl emendation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
\ INSTRUCTIONS
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration., v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies
""""~"
}
i ^_j Tl.'.-'.' T I_ _'___ ~ '__ *_ .
•] local agencies j planp.Kig agencies , others)
j
i
2. Do .nol. include FY 19P/J progrr-r; grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supple^rtal request separately.
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Divivuv]
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4QOS(a)(i); Resource Consp.vation jnd Keco/ery"
Act of 1975 ;RCRA)
Data of Award:
*' (A£tjB3_or anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
or proposed) $055,643
Federal CrMnt Amount:
nl or proposed) $246,408 ($551,000 •:. I located)
Brief description of project or prou^m'c.ow<:J: Tin3 gn^. is £'.,-a de] to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal faci icies tviou :;n ':eo;:;i. c> :te.--a. arc!
development of State Solid V'aste Man a qciic.it Pi-..r,, as dc-ef i.ic-L Y, ; ?OM";;' .or :; nan-
datsd by Section 4C-.V of RCHA. ficates nnsl: -e.ir ce;-L;i': pla;;,',i<, -:";-',:'-^;,;i PCS in
the rec,ulacions in order *o re;n.i;n elirntve ;~c> \u\c~'•••?). Tn-.-... ;-"i t.^n":...' '-qn^re-
>;;ent5 include: the formal :d:nt; "icauion or rt: ,,H n.^lf-!e so i i j • a . .;e i.1-.•;., j'.r,?,'•:
agencies at .'.li levels of govoriinient; Jcvi-'o.irr.'it of 'e••;- i--'.o\ ri:thori-
r.ies over land dispose.!, based upon tne Fedei'a > tr~i {.•:•<: i:,' r':."' .11 r*" >-.•_-• ^Yo ^egal
i.^pediirents to resource recovery; and planning -~r:r af'eq^iC£- , ';'-,:_/ fap.cicy. if
funding permit;.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. f.otnplets fores, by State» for all project or ^r-ojrai .; "r:-, a..-,v^ j^ ^
Qj" under^^co^sj^.gration, within that State (inriurjc f/'-mti Ic r-:;-.LC a^'-fcvr:, **','
'VbcTT"i}C|enc'!SSl pTati7nng agencies, others) ii~
• 'W
2. Do BQi include FY 15£0 program grants or ro-istr-rtion '.,- :;,, '• •"
3. Tr^et each supplemental request separately.
-------
Al:-TLi./jLi'ii.'_..:_.L:F.:v.'.- .."•'.-....'Ji*'.'.*'. •' : IC^'j i()->
3" icj? of .?10 .... _
niVlSIO!!; --"M >" and Mai-.srdou^ Ma', u* \ •. i s Ji\'i:. i;ir
n'-;,",NCH: Ua> le Managenent Bi-a,Kh
at,thorizir!0 S-cticn/l.a,v: Section 3011: Rcsou.-ce Conservacir, ?/id f^.cverj, Act
of i57o (RCRA)
Data of Award.
i (Actyal. cr anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(££lMl or proposed) $226,814
federal Grant Amount: ?
(ZLClUjI or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated) I
**'
Brief description of project or program covered: This gr?:r: is awarded to sup- i'-"':
pert the eventual development or a fully authon'zed hazardous waste nvjnajenierr; jf:.'
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section J006 o, RCRA. Irs 'states t"'
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tii^e, the U. S. ..'.vironnir;ntji F"o-- T"
tectionAgency will use these funds to operate che prog-am IP 1,,nat Str.te. Some of j'
the activities that are developmental in nat.uro include: resource assc ss ,:er,t; Ic— '',
gal and regulatory development; oarmii: end manifest sysLorn do1'.-: Ic.^n.en1.; jxcansion '•
of surveillance and enforcement programs; puolic participaiio1., acandon^J site and
errergoncy response programs. 1-
INSTRUCT I CMS:
. ^ta for,T:s, i?y S^ate, for nil p."c,;ert ,-r f'OTra." • • • :
or w.d^r_cpr.3_id2ration, within thit Statu (ipcludo ^'..ui1. v t '. , ':
To^fal agencies, pTaiTiiTng ng ancle-; , others)
' *
2. Do jioj;, induce FC 1930 procron gr^iins cr c-:nstri,c,t:o"! .
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous MattYials Division
- BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Co:iservatir/> and Recovery Act
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
*' (Act.ua! cr anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Frojoct Cost:
(fi£iiia.L °r proposed) $226,814
Federal Grant Amount:
or proposed) $187,284 ($818,690 allocated) '
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to sup- i
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management I
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. '.".nvironmental Pro- •
tection Agency will use these funds to oper?te the program in that State. Some of ;
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assoss'.ient; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; jxpansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic'iparioM, abandoneJ site and •
emergency response programs. i-
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Cr-mp!ete forms, by State, for all project or p'oqro;n c ,nts,
or ur.de r_ corys i dgrat I on, vn th i n thai: State: (include grants tc \*.?.t =
" * a^enr'ies, pTan~nsng agencies, others)
2. D.-) JIQ.L include Fr 1930 program grants or. constriction gr, ,ti».
3. Treat each supplenental request srr
-------
State of
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
1 BRANCH: Waste Management Branch • •
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(n)(i); Resource Conse.-y/ation jnd Roco/ery'-
Act of 197G (RCfW) ,
Date of Award:
fc (AOuulor anticipated) July 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
•(/&-UiaJL or proposed) $856,643
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $246,408 ($551,000 allocated)
Brief description of project Q*" program' cowreJ: This gran: is awa*deJ to sup-
port an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federo : criteria, ar.d
development of State Solid Waste Management Plr.r.s, as defined :r, regulat ior.s man- ,
dated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain plcsrninq requirements in '
the regulations in order to remain eligible for funding.. The ,•_ planning rf. quire- •
ments include: the formal identification of responsible solid waste iiv.najeT.ent
agencies at e.ll leveU of government; development of legal an-, regulator/ Authori-
ties over land disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; rem.;al of certain legal
irrpedirents to resource recovery; and planning for adequate r.c.ility r.apicity, if <
funding permits.
\\
INSTRUCTIONS:
Complete forms, by State, for all project or program ^•••nts, active
u.itiqr consideration, within that State (include chants lc r-tate u'^ncie
aTTjgiirfci'ss, plahrnng ogsncies, others)
2. Do jiQi include FY 1550 program grants or ronstriTtion (,r."ts.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of Ohio--Cuyahoga County
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date ef Award: August 2, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $331,714
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $248,786
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase II project to conduct procurement activities for a 2000-3000 tpd facility
to serve metropolitan Cleveland and supply steam to a major industrial complex.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or u n d e r consider a t ion, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local a ge ncTesTpTannTng agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants-.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS PEP?^," - 'T"Y"S -V -'^ "";T A^M"~r
State or _Qhl(L
'v,: Air Si Hazardous Materials Division
: Pesticides
-'z-inn Section/Lc•.-.•: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
c -":,•:,.-d: cannot be anticipated
$121,353
$103,000
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application.
-------
STATUS REPORI -_ G^" 'ITS ATVOR _GF;A:n__ A^lrJC'J^
State of _0hio_
-'C'i: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
Pesticides
riling Section/Lav;: Section 23(a)(2), FIFRA, as amended
r.f A.-i-d: 6/21/79
ject Cose: $133,420
$26,833
" ":jr:t or program coverc-J:
Provide funds to supplement costs of state pesticide applicator certification
program during FY 79.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohi o-Toledo Metropoli tan Council of Governments
DIVISION: Air a.nd Hazardous Materials .Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $155,510
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $116,633
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
' ' &
Phase II project to evaluate proposals for an energy recovery facility to ?.--•
process 1000-1500 tpd from the Toledo area. This cooperative agreement will ir'
support existing system analysis, project management, and selection of a
full-service vendor.
I-..-.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do jot include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
t»*.*irt*-
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Ohio—Montgomery County '-;•-•.
• >'.'.'
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials .Division , - i-V:":',;
*•'*'"* •
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch .-
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 27, 1979 ; '^^
(Actual or anticipated) p^-;l
• . **•:': -'..
Total Project Cost: $156,849 : -' '' . ft:"
(Actual or proposed) • ;-
Federal Grant Amount: $117,637 .
(Actual or proposed) ' ; •
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Market cultivation, industrial park development, and the retrofitting of 0TT
incinerators (whose failure to comply with air emiss.iph standards contributed V.;;:..
to the interest in resource recovery) are all being considered as project i-.,..;,'
development options for the Dayton area. K
Market development, waste stream control efforts, source separation, and
public participation are the principal activities to be supported under
this cooperative agreement.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to- State agencies,
"Vocal agencies, planning agencies, others) •:
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
SIS UPDATE
LOG
MONTH JULY
WISCONSIN
YEAR
1979
(state)
Last UPDATE Issued In:
PART I
Environmental Agencies
Executive Branch
Legislative Branch
Agencies, Commissions
and Boards
Public Interest Groups
State Environmental
Legislation
PART II
Regional Program Staff
PART III
GRANT STATUS REPORT
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
PART IV
Air and Hazardous
Materials
Water
Enforcement
'ART IV A GRANTS /APPL
FEE
MARCH
APRII
MAY
JUNE
JULY
1
2-4a
5-8
9-11
1-6
AUC
SEP"
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
1
File at beginning of the appropriate state section, replacing previous log,
111!
-------
Wl I 1
Ul
u
cc
o
Ul
CC
cc
3
O W
sSISg
3 Q u- Q Q.
03
&
Ul
a
c
o
!«!
o b i,
g £ "oi o« 5
HI
3 UIU. u. 0. It E Q
u
wQ
§
< s
" - >
3 ^
• 1 3
C _
am
i
* r r = 3 ^
^ 0 0 Q 0 «
u Z Z (/i c/i >
£« 5,8
= a
OS
o
c i
IS
e c 2
a g -
551*1
a u
NATURAL RESOURCES
2/79
-------
Wl I 2
WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
P. 0. Box 7921
Pyare. Square Building
4610 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53703
Secretary of Natural Resources:
Deputy Secretary:
Executive Assistant:
Legislative Liaison:
Aid Programs and Federal Funding
Inland Lake Renewal
Planning and Analysis
Bureau of Aid Programs:
Environmental Impact Bureau
Finance Bureau
Information and Education Bureau
Legal Services Bureau
Planning Bureau
Research Bureau
Enforcement Division-
Administrator
Director, Law Enforcement
Director, Water Regulation
and Zoning
Chief, Compliance
Natural Resources Board
Chairperson: Clifford F. Messinger
Vice Chair: Daniel T. Flaherty
Secretary: John C. Brogan
Members:
Catherine Conroy
Richard A. Hemp
Divisions:
(608) 266-2121
Anthony S- Earl
Andrew C. Damon
W. Michael Ley
Kristin R. Visser
Paul N. Guthrie, Jr.
0. D.. Williams
Bruce B. Braun
Eric P. Jensen
Howard Druckenmiller
Clarence Goldsworthy
Jeffrey W. Smoller
James A. Kurtz-
Arthur D. Doll
Cyril Kabat
Andrew C.
Donald L.
Damon
Beghin
Floyd F. Stautz
John C. Fontaine
-2175
-0836
-3125
-2197
-2359
-0860
-2951
-2747
-3695
-0818
-8170
-2121
-1115
-8034
-2672
John A. Lawtcn
Steve Pavich
Environmental Standards Division
Thomas A. Kroehn, Administrator
Air Management Bureau
Robert A. Arnott, Director
Water Quality Bureau
Carl J. Blabaum, Director
Solid Waste Management Bureau
Robert Krill, Director
-1099
-0603
-6910
-1327
2/79
-------
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Divisions (cont'd)
Research Management Division
Carroll D. Besadny, Administrator
Office of Land Lake Renewal
0. D. Williams, Director
Bureau, of Research
___._Cyril Kabat,^Director
Bureau, of Engineering
Jerald D- Slack,. Director
Bureau of Fish Management
James T. Addis,. Director
Bureau of Forestry
Milton E. Reinke, Director
Bureau of Parks and Recreation
Donald JT. Mackie, Director
Bureau of Real Estate
Edward J. Faber, Director
Bureau of Wildlife Management
John M. Keener, Director
Office of Lands
James R. Huntoon, Director-
WI I J
Services Division
Administrator
Office Services Bureau
Robert H. Mayfield, Director
Personnel Bureau
Robert W. Conner, Director
Trust Lands and Investments Division
Stephen E. Gauger, Administrator
Field Districts:
Lake Michigan District
Charles E. Higgs, District Director
North Central District
John G. Brasch, District Director
Northwest District
Arthur A. Oehmcke, District Director
Southeast District
Robert F. Winne, District Director
(608) 266-0837
-3125
-8170
-2136
-7025
-0842
-2152
-0201
-2193
-3462
-8933
-2452
-2472
-1370
(414) 497-4040
(715) 362-7617
(715) 635-2101
(414) 257-6543
2/79
-------
W( [ 1*
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - cont'd
Field Districts: (cont'd)
Southern District
Douglas W. Morrissette
West Central District
James L. Lissack, District Director
(608) 266-2131
(715) 836-2821
Councils r
Air Pollution Control Council
Inland Lakes Protection and Rehabilitation Council
Mine Reclamation Council
Natural Resources Council of State Agencies
PCS Advisory Council
Scientific Areas Preservation Council
Snowmobile Recreational Council
Wisconsin Citizens Environmental Council
Wisconsin Conservation Congress, Executive Council
Governmental activities for preserving and protecting natural resources in
Wisconsin are largely the province of the Department of Natural Resources.
The Department of Agriculture and the Board of Soil and Water Conservation
Districts at the University of Wisconsin are also actively involved.
A 7-member, part-time Natural Resources Board is appointed by the governor
to provide policy direction for the programs administered by the Department
of Natural Resources. The board appoints a full-time secretary, who serves
as the chief executive, officer of the department.
Four functional divisions have the primary responsibility for the department's
programs: Environmental Standards Enforcement, Resource Management and
Services.
The field operations of the department are under the direction of six district
directors, each responsible for the total mission of the department in his
or her district. Advisory committees assisting the Natural Resources Board
include,the citizen-elected Conservation Congress, groups on aquatic nuisance
control, research, forest management, county forests, forest pest control,
Great Lakes commercial fishery and outdoor recreation.
2/79
-------
Wl I 5
WI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES cont'd
The department is responsible for providing an adequate and flexible system
for planning and managing the protection, development and use of the water,
air, forest, fish, game and other plant and wild animal resources of the
state, and for the control of solid waste and refuse disposal. In addition,
the department reviews the natural resources programs of other state
agencies and makes appropriate recommendations to the governor and the
legislature.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (608) 266-1113
Hill Farms State Office Building
4802. Sheboygan Avenue
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary: Zel S. Rice III -1113
Deputy Secretary: Wayne McGown -1113
Executive Assistant Harry L. Peterson -8129
Offices:
Advisory Services James S. Thiel, Director -8810
Information George Bechtel, Director -7744
Policy and Program Analysis Roger Schrantz, Admin. -6479
Divisions:
Aeronautics Fritz E. Wolf, Admin. -3351
Business Management Norbert K. Anderson, Admin. -2878
Highways Robert T. Huber, Chairperson
Highway Commission -2913
Motor Vehicles James 0. Peterson, Admin. -2233
The Department plans and administers highway construction contracts and
maintains the entire state trunk highway system. It administers all
federal funds for highway systems in Wisconsin, licenses vehicles and
drivers, maintains vehicle and driver records, and enforces state traffic
regulations and codes. It is responsible for planning, designing, and
supervising construction of all public airports in Wisconsin, serving as
agent for all airport sponsors who receive state and federal aid. It directs
all-mode transportation planning for the state.
The Department works with the Department of Natural Resources in the estab-
lishment of highway information centers, roadside development, and state
parks roadways. Of increasing importance is the department's comprehensive
consideration of environmental protection and the preservation of state
records, which involve interagency relationships with the federal Environmental
Protection Agency as well as with the state, regional, and local agencies
and the public.
2/79
-------
WT I 6
LU
at
LLL
<
£
«7>
i: i
LU ->'
U_
O
2
H~
z-
<
O
o
•a O
4 i i
•a 2 « 5 >
2 2 = S -D =
I 5 = £ 5 3
"3 "S - a ^
a. c £ J! ^
^ a a 5 •§ ^ 5
01 < < o < - <
DOO
2/79
-------
WI I 7
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF WISCONSIN
Mailing Address: State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
GOVERNOR Lee S. Dreyfus (R) . (608) 266-1212
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Russell A. Olson (R) (608) 266-3516
ATTORNEY GENERAL Bronson C. La Follette (D)
SECRETARY OF STATE Vel R. Phillips (D)
2/79
-------
Wl I 8
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION
UNITED STATES SENATE - WISCONSIN
William Proxmire
(D)
Madison, Wisconsin
(414) 272-0388, (608) 252-5338
II. S. Senate
Washington B.C. 20510
(202) 224-5653
Gay lord A.. Nelson (D)
(414) 224-3965 or 224-3966
U-S. Senate
Washington D.C. 20510
(202) 224-5323
UNITED STATES CONGRESS - WISCONSIN
By District
1 Les Aspin D Racine
2 Robert W. Kastenmeier D Sun Prairie
3 Alvin Baldus
5 Henry S. Reuss
D Menomonie
4 Clement J. Zablocki D Milwaukee
D Milwaukee
U. S. House of Represenatives
Washington D.C. 20515
(414) 63,2-8194
(202) 225-3031
(608) 252-5206
(202) 225-2906
(715) 835-4671
(202) 225-5506
(414) 383-4000
(202) 225-4572
(414) 224-1331
(202) 225-3571
David R. Obey
8 Toby Roth
D Wausau
R Appleton
(715) 842-5606
(202) 225-3365
F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. R Shorewood
2/79
-------
Wl I 9
LEGISLATIVE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
Wisconsin Congressional Districts
«.*•.«
SENATORS
Nelson
Proxmire
REPRESENTATIVES
1. Aspin
2. Kastenmeier
3. Baldus
4. Zablodd
5. Reuss
6. Vacant
7. Obey
8. Roth
9. Sensenbrenner
2/79
-------
Wl I 10
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
1979 STATE SENATE
Mailing Address:
By Name
Adelman, Lynn S.
Bablitch, William A.
Bear, Peter
Berger, David G.
Bidwell, Everett V.
Braun, Warren D.
Chilsen, Water John
Cullen, Timothy F.
Flynn, James T.
Frank, Jrt A.
Goyke, Gary R.
Harnisch, Thomas W.
Kleczka, Gerald D.
Kreul, Richard
Krueger, Clifford W.
Lasee, Alan J.
Lorge, Gerald D.
Maurer, John J.
McCallum, J. Scott
Moody, James P.
Murphy, Roger P.
Offner, Paul
Petri, Thomas E.
Radosevich, Michele G,
Risser, Fred A.
Roshell, Marvin J.
Strohl, Joseph
Swan, Monroe
Theno, Daniel 0.
Thompson, Carl W.
Van Sistine, Jerome
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
R
R
D
R
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
28
24
13
5
27
11
29
15
8
7
19
31
3
17
12
L
14
22
18
9
33
32
2
10
26
23
21
6
25
16
30
New Berlin
Stevens Point
Madison
Milwaukee
Portage
Milwaukee
Wausau
Janesville
West Allis
Milwaukee
Oshkosh
Neillsville
Milwaukee
Fennimore
Merrill
De Pere
Bear Creek
Kenosha
Fond du Lac
Milwaukee
Waukesha
La Crosse
Fond du Lac
Hudson
Madison
Chippewa Falls
Racine
Milwaukee
Ashland
Stoughton
Green Bay
State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702
By District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Alan J. Lasee R
Petri>. Thomas E. R
Gerald Kleczka D
David G. Berger D
Monroe Swan D
Kurt Frank D
James T. Flynn D
James P. Moody D
Radosevich, Michele G D
Warren D. Braun
Clifford Krueger
Peter Bear
Gerald Lorge
Timothy Cullen
Carl W. Thompson
Richard Kreul
Scott J. McCallum
Gary R. Goyke
John Strohl
John Maurer
Marvin J. Roshell
William A. Bablitch
Daniel 0. Theno
Fred A. Risser
Everett V. Bidwell
Lynn Adelman
Walter John Chilsen
Jerome Van Sistine
Thomas W, Harnisch
Paul Offner
Roger P. Murphy
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
R
D
D
D
R
2/79
-------
Wl
11
MEMBERS OF THE 1979 WISCONSIN ASSEMBLY
State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
Representatives
Andrea, Joseph F.
Barczak, Gary J.
Barry, Jonathan B.
Becker, Dismas
Behnke, Robert E.
Bradley, Gordon R.
Broydrick, William B.
Byers, Francis R.
Clarenbach, David E.
Coggs, Marcia P.
Conradt, Ervin W.
Czerwinski, Joseph C.
DeLong, Delmar E.
Dilweg, Gary T.
Donoghue, Sheehan
Dorff, Eugene J.
Duren, Joanne M.
Ellis, Michael G.
Everson, Harland E.
Ferrall, R. Michael
Fischer, Daniel
Flintrop, Richard A.
Gagin, William P.
Gerlach, Chester A.
Goodrich, Patricia A.
Gunderson, Steve
Harer, Robert
Harsdorf, James
Hasenohrl, Donald A.
Hauke, Thomas A.
Helbach, David
Hephner, Gervase A.
Hopkins, David
Jackamonis, Edward G.
Johnson, Gary K.
Johnston, Rod
Kedrowski, David R.
Kincaid, Lloyd H.
Kirby, Michael G.
Klicka, George H.
Laatsch, James F.
Ladwig, E. James
Lallensack, Francis J.
Larson, Robert J.
Lee, Mordecai
Leopold, Stephen R.
Lewis, James R.
D
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
R
R
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
64
24
47
32
14
57
16
40
78
18
41
27
44
4
35
65
50
55
38
62
3
56
68
21
71
91
29
30
70
23
71
6
67
98
45
10
74
36
13
22
80
63
2
34
31
26
53
Kenosha
West Allis
Mt. Horeb
Milwaukee
Milwaukee
Oshkosh
Milwaukee
Marion
Madison
Milwaukee
Shiocton
Milwaukee
Clinton
Green Bay
Merrill
Kenosha
Cazenovia
Neenah
Edgerton
Racine
Reedsville
Oshkosh
Eau Claire
So. Milw.
Berlin
Osseo
Woodville
Beldenville
Pittsville
West Allis
Stevens Point
Chilton
Chippewa Falls
Waukesha
Beloit
Milw.
Washburn
Crandon
Milw.
Wauwatosa
Arlington
Racine
Manitowoc
Medford
Milw.
Milw.
West Bend
366-0486
0620
5780
7211
0634
7500
1106
3794
8570
3786
2253
8580
1182
3070
7671
0455
7694
8530
2027
0315
5780
7690
9174
5810
1526
8077
1526
9650
8366
0631
5340
0645
8552
3387
8535
1170
1194
0660
5580
2343
9180
2530
0656
7461
2512
5342
8551
2/79
-------
Wl I 12
Lewison, Bernard
Lingren, Ronald H.
Loftus, Thomas A.
Lorman, Hilton
Luckhardt, Esther Doughty
Matty, Richard P.
McClain, Edward F.
McEssy, Earl F.
Medinger, John D.
Menos, Gus G.
Merkt, John L.
Metz, Sharon K.
Miller, Marjorie M.
Munts, Mary Lou
Murray, Thomas B.
Norquist, John 0.
Omernick, Raymond
Opitz, David W.
Otte, Carl
Pabst, Richard E.
Paulson, David
Plewa, John R.
Porter, Cloyd A.
Potter, Calvin
Prosser, David, Jr.
Quackenfaush, Robert L.
Radtke, Randall
Roberts, Virgil
Rogers, William J.
Rboney, James F.
Rutkowski, James A.
Schmidt, Earl
Schneider, Marlin D.
Shabaz, John C.
Shoemaker, Richard A.
Smith, Patricia Spafford
Snyder, Harry G.
Soucie, Kevin <••
Swoboda, Lary J.
Tesmer, Louise M.
Thompson, Tommy G.
Travis, David M.
Travis, Robert S., Jr.
Tregoning, Joseph E.
Tuczynski, Phillip J.
Ulichny, Barbara
Vanderperren, Cletus
Wagner, Mary K.
Wahner, James W.
Ward, Walter L., Jr.
Wood, Wayne W.
Young, John M.
R
D
D
R
R
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
D
D
R
R
D
D
R
D
R
D
R
R
R
D
D
D
D
R
D
R
D
D
R
D
D
D
R
D
R
R
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
R
96
97
46
39
54
88
85
52
95
11
12
90
77
76
73
8
86
60
58
33
28
20
43
59
42
92
81
94-
5
61
82
87
93
83
69
75
84
7
1
19
79
37
49
51
9
25
89
66
15
17
48
99
Viroqua
Menomonee Falls
Sun Prairie
Ft . Atkinson
Horicon
Crivitz
Wausau
Fond du Lac
La Crosse
Glendale
Mequon
Green Bay
Madison
Madison
Superior
Milw.
Wittenberg
Port Washington
Sheboygan
Milw.
Amery
Milw.
Burlington
Kohler
Appleton
Sparta
Lake Mills
Holmen
Kaukauna
Racine
Hales Corners
Birnamwood
Wis. Rapids
New Berlin
Menomonie
Rice Lake
Oconomowoc
Milw.
Luxemberg
Milw.
Elroy
Madison
Platteville
Shullsburg
Milw.
Milw.
Green Bay
Salem
Milw.
Milw.
Janesville
Brookf ield
1192
5840
3780
3790
1190
3756
0654
3156
7211
0486
2343
7503
7521
3784
0650
5830
9180
7671
2056
3072
9650
7505
2530
0640
3070
3756
3794
3097
0610
0731
8590
7461
0215
2417
2519
2519
1190
9870
5350
8588
7746
5340
1170
7502
0484
9170
0616
9170
2401
0960
9172
9174
2/79
-------
VI I 13
£.
•<
S
5
3
a
a
2/79
-------
Wl I
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
WISCONSIN SENATE
Rules Review
Chairman, Senator David G. Berger
Members:
Monroe Swan
Peter Bear
James P. Moody
Roger P. Murphy
Agriculture, Labor and Local Affairs Committee
Chairman: Senator Jerome Van Sistine
Members :
Marvin J. Ro shell
Carl W. Thompson
Monroe Swan
Richard Kreul
Natural Resources and Tourism Committee
Chairman: Thomas W. Harnisch
Members :
Joseph Strohl
Gary R. Goyke
Jerome Van Sistine
Daniel 0. Theno
Finance Committee
Chairman: Senator Gerald D. Kleczka
Members:
John J. Maurer Paul Offner
James T. Flynn Michele G. Radosevich
Warren D. Braun Walter John Chilsen
2/79
-------
Wl I 15
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEES
Affrn-*nxstrative Rules ComnHttee
Chairperson: William Rogers
Vice Chair: David Clarenbach
Members:
Edward McClain
Mary Wagner
Tommy Thompson
Agriculture Committee
(608) 266-0291
(608) 266-2180
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Harland Everson
Jonathan Barry
Members:
Gervase Hephner
Lary Swoboda
Donald Hasenohrl
Daniel Fischer
Richard Shoemaker
Energy Committee
Chairperson:
Vice Chair:
Patricia Spafford Smith
Joseph Tregoning
John Merkt
James Harsdorf
David Paulson
James Laatsch
(608) 266-3453
Sharon Metz
David Clarenbach
Members:
R. Michael Ferrall
Mary Lou Hunts
Thomas Loftus
Chester Gerlach
Environmental Resources Committee
Cloyd Porter
Rod Johnston
Robert Barer"
(608) 266- 3453
Chairperson:
Vice-Chair:
Mary Lou Munts
Daniel Fischer
Members:
David Kedrowski
Thomas Loftus
Jonathan Barry
Kevin Soucie
William Broydrick
David Opitz
Randall Radtke
Ray Omerick
William Gagin
2/79
-------
Wl I 16
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES
ASSEMBLY (cont'd)
Finance Committee (608) 266-8535
Chairperson: Gary Johnson.
Vice Chair: Carl Otte
Members:
Virgil Roberts
John. Norquist
Ronald Lingren
Michael Kirby
Michael Ellis
Rules Committee (608) 266-0291
Chairperson: Robert Behnke
Vice-Chair: James Wanner (Ex Officio)
Members:
Ed Jackamonis*
R. Michael Ferrall*
David Kedrowski*
James Rooney*
Thomas Murray
John Plewa
John Shabaz*
Tommy Thompson*
Delmar De Long*
Joint Legislative Council
Mordecai. Lee
* Ex-Officio
2/79
-------
W| I 17
WISCONSIN
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
All members of the Wisconsin legislature are elected from single
member districts. 33 Senators are elected for 4-year terms from
single member districts. All representatives to the Assembly are
elected biennially.
The Wisconsin Senate has 12 standing committees. The Assembly has
29 standing committees and both houses together have 6 joint commi-
tees and 2 research agencies known as joint survey committees. The
Committee on Finance in each house together constitute the Joint Com-
mittee on Finance, and the Committee for Review of Administrative
Rules in each house together constitute the Joint Committee. Standing
Committees hold public hearings on the measures introduced in the
legislature.
The progress of a bill through the Wisconsin Legislature begins with
the introduction of a. bill by one or more authors and possibly co-
sponsors, or by a legislative committee. A bill can be introduced in
either house of the legislature by members of that house with co-
sponsors from the other house, but sometimes identical bills are intro-
duced in both houses.
On a routine basis the members of the Wisconsin Legislature are sup-
plies with certain factual information regarding every measure intro-
duced. Fiscal estimates put a price tag on legislation - every mea-
sure which increases or decreases state or local government revenues
or expeditures must be accompanied by a reliable estimate of its
short-range and long-range fiscal effects. Most of the fiscal esti-
mates are prepared by a joint survey committee of legislators and
others who evaluate not only the fiscal effect, its legality and its
desirability. All bills fearing fiscal estimates must be referred to
the Joint Committee on Finance before they can be enacted into law.
After introduction, each bill proposal is referred to a standing
committee for review. The standing committee may schedule and hold a.
hearing on the proposal. The committee then decides whether to return
the proposal to the house of origin with a favorable or adverse recom-
mendation or recommend the bill in an amended form. After 21 days,
any proposal that has not been reported out of an Assembly committee
may be withdrawn by majority vote, of, if within 21 days, by a two-
thirds vote. In the Senate, a proposal may be withdrawn from commit-
tee at any time by majority vote.
Both houses of the Wisconsin Legislature have adopted a procedure for
systematic calendar scheduling of proposals. In the Senate, all pro-
posals reported by standing committees are referred to the Committee
on Senate Organization; in the Assembly, they are referred to the
2/79
-------
Wl I 18
Committee on Rules. These two committees schedule all business for
floor debate. When a bill is reached on the calendar and given a
second reading, amendments to the bill may be considered. Amendments
to a bill may be offered at any time prior to engrossment. The rules
of both houses require rescheduling of the proposal after engrossment.
Second and third reading of a proposed bill can occur on the same
legislative days. After third reading, the question becomes: "Shall
the bill pass?" upon which time the bill can again be debated. The
bill may be passed by voice vote or by roll call.
If the bill passes, it is messaged to the other house, where it goes
through the same procedure. However, the bill is often referred
directly to the calendar instead of to a standing committee. If the
bill is concurred by the second house, it is messaged back to the
house of origin. When both houses agree on the identical bill and
amendments, the Legislative Reference Bureau enrolls it for the house
of origin, the official copy is signed by the chief clerks of the
houses and by the speaker if an Assembly bill, and the bill is sent
to the Governor. The Governor has 6 days, in which to approve or
veto a bill. He can either 1) sign a bill, in which case it becomes
a law; 2) fail to sign it within 6 days, whereby - if the legislature
is still in session - it would become law; 3) veto it in whole or, if
an appropriation bill, in part; or 4) if the legislature has adjourned
sine die, fail to sign it, thus killing the bill (so-called pocket
veto).
2/79
-------
Wl I 19
WISCONSIN COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND AGENCIES
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION (608) 266-1741
Wilson Street State Office Building
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary of Administration Robert H. Dunn
Deputy Secretary Rebecca C. Young
State Planning and Energy Stephen M. Born, Director
Responsible for carrying out broad statutory authority for the coordination
and improvement of services provided to state agencies. Provides management
services and assistance to state agencies. Facilitates planning by governor
and legislature. Analyzes administrative and fiscal problems and recommends
solutions.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (608) 266-7100
801 W. Badger Road
Madison, WI
Secretary of Agriculture Gary E. Rohde
Deputy Secretary Arthur R. Kurtz -7102
Primary responsibilities are for food and trade regulation, animal disease and
plant pesticide eradication and marketing services. Animal disease and plant
pest eradication includes inspection, survey , laboratory services, regulation
and quarantine procedures.. Consumer inspection is emphasized in meat inspec-
tion, pesticide residue surveillance, development of administrative
designed to protect the home owner and new programs to stop deceptive labeling
and improper packaging practices.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT (608) 266-3222
Suite 650
123 W. Washington Avenue
Madison, WI 53702.
Secretary of Business Dev. Jean C. Broeren
Deputy Secretary
Purpose is to foster the state's economy, as it relates to both industrial
development and tourism, through research, planning and promotion. Provides
assistance to commercial, industrial and recreational developers and to small
and minority enterprises.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES (608) 266-3681
Wilson Street State Office Building
Madison, WI 53702
Secretary of Health and Social Services Manuel Carballo
Deputy Secretary James A. Krauskopf
Division of Health -1514
Health Policy and Planning Ralph L. Andreano -7358
2/79
-------
Wl I 20
WI AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS cont'd
GREAT LAKES COMPACT COMMISSION (608) 266-1221
Department of Justice
Room 114 East
State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702
Executive Director Col. Leonard J. Goodsell
Wisconsin members on the Great Lakes Commission, represent the state's
interest in carrying out the purposes and functions by the interstate
agency. Commission functions in areas of environmental quality control,
shoreline use and recreation, Seaway system navigation and commerce,
fisheries and wildlife, fresh water resources, etc.
INTERSTATE PORT AUTHORITY COMMISSION (608) 266-0262
Room 404 West
State Capitol
Madison 53702
Members:
Senator Daniel Theno, Wisconsin Chairperson
Representative Thomas B. Murray
Eileen Mershart
Gilbert Erickson
James Sauter
Commission directed to develop a plan for the merger of the port authorities
at Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin.
DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS AND DEVELOPMENT (608) 266-1018
123 West Washington Avenue
Madison, IL 53702
Secretary William R. Bechtel
Deputy Secretary Larry J. Brown -7355
Assists governor in coordinating activities of all state programs having an
impact on community problems and plans.
MINNESOTA-W SCONSIN BOUNDARY AREA COMMISSION (612)436-7131
(715) 386-9444
Joint effort by Wisconsin and Minnesota to conduct studies and develop
recommendations relating to present and future protection, use and develo-
opment in the public interest, of the lands, river valleys and waters which
for the boundary between the states.
2/79
-------
Wl I 21
WI AGENCIES, COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS cont'd
MISSISSIPPI RIVER PARKWAY PLANNING COMMISSION (608) 266-7744
Office of INfonnation
Department of Transportation
Hill Farms State Office Building
Madison 53702
Coordinates program for development of the Great River Road in. Wisconsin and
cooperates with similar committees in other states and. Canadian provinces
to develop the road from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (608) 266-2001
432 Hill Farms State Office Building
Madison 53702
Chairperson: Charles Cicchetti
Members: Matthew Holden, Jr.
John. C. Oestreicher
Responsible for regulation of public utilities, including those municipally
owned and operated; railroads and motor carriers.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE . (608) 266-1611
General Executive Facility I
201 East Washington Avenue
Madison 53702
Secretary of Revenue Dennis J. Conta
• Deputy Secretary
Administers all state tax laws, determines equalized value of taxable property,
assists local governments in assessments of property, provides auditing and
related accounting services to local units of government upon request.
SOLID WASTE RECYCLING AUTHORITY (608) 266-2686
3321 West Beltline Highway
Madison 53713
Executive Director J. R. Castner
Implements and develops solid waste disposal and recycling facilities.
Authorized to acquire, construct and operate public solid waste recycling
facilities; coordinates all solid waste recycling activities within each
region, etc.
UPPER_GREAT LAKES REGIONAL COMMISSION (608) 266-7532
123 W. Washington Ave., 9th floor (202) 377-2845
Madison 53702
Federal-state-local partnership designed to serve local communities in
northern and central Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan with economic
development problems. Initiates technical assistance and supplemental
grant projects.
2/79
-------
Wl I 22
WI AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
Geological and Natural History Survey, Wisconsin (608) 262-1705
1815 University Avenue
Madison 53706
State Geologist Meredith E. Ostrom
Inventory, investigate and analyze Wisconsin's land, water and other natural
resources. Nine program units: mineral resources and mining, environmental
geology, geophysics/geochemistry, water resources, soils, climatology,
education and information, topographic mapping and biology.
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
Soil and Water Conservation Districts Board (608) 262-2634
Supervises and coordinates efforts of the soil and water conservation districts
in Wisconsin in conserving the soil and water resources of the state, approves
federally assisted watershed development programs and administers state funds
to districts.
2/79
-------
WI II 1
> 1
S 5
w ft
HI ^ Si
ov
"S""
§313
eri tj a I*
3#£ S
o
0.
LU
oc
(0
,3
S
o 2 tf" »* «» *• 3 o o o
fill U « I- !a
i§s r
5s 3 I
it s
*
'S. Ti
u£ 2
2a3
3 g a .
||;:
•u-9
|^.
J I
oc
o
o
oc
li
o o
ll
!r
4 M
•".a u3£
I
g 3
5 3
J I
is ss
SS
•§£
i c
_u
oc
o
u.
e
I
o
u
cc
a
o
oc
a.
<
I
i
S 3
3 t^ « a
31SN^
04 3 "5 T3
g|2^
I i
1. .a
u < O 4J o ci
sl 23 s;
-3 3« 8«
! ll
** S iJ K
« -T
5 > 5-
1^ 24 I
X o *3 "
Is H 3
r if 2
« >cS w
•S J-3J«
O « uj u M
i \
? =>*!' a?
35!
r3
3-"\
§asi
30 vj c_, a
^5^3i
-------
KEY *
G = Guidance
D = Draft
C = Reg. Comments
Date
USEPA - REGION V
GRANT STATUS REPORTS *
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - Part III
May 1980
III 1
State
WISCONSIN
F - Final
A = Award
E = Evaluation
Jan
AIR POLLUTION Planned
CONTROL Actual
(Section lOi) Comments
SOLID WASTE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
Comments
HAZARDOUS Planned
WASTE Actual
MANAGEMENT Comments
i
WATER Planned
POLLUTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
(Section 106)
PUBLIC Planned
WATER Actual
SUPERVISION Comments'
UNDERGROUND Planned
INJECTION Actual
CONTROL Comments
STATE Planned
MANAGEMENT Actual
(Section 205g)
WATER Planned
QUALITY Actual
PLANNING Comments
(Section 208)
Feb
Mar
^pr
Hay
G
G
June
July
n
D
Aug
C
Sept
F
Oct
A
C,F
Nov
-ct
CJ t-l
e «
C 3
r-i O
Dec $ P" $<
A
G
E
D
D
C
F
C
A
F
A
32
G
L
D
D
C
F
C
A
F
A
i .
44
E
G
D/C
F
A
FY 80 Allocation $1,380,000
G
D
C
F
A
FY 81 Allotment - $751 ,200
G
D
C
F
A
1
FY 81 Allotment - $47,200
C
r Y / ? c r* c n
j
Award pro_
CT C"
- app ic2t[:
jccroi for .
i E
1
t! .6M
,n for 3 !,£•'• has beer, ,-scs yed .
5/20
G
A
'!
I
* Indicate KEY letters for each grant. Utilize all KEY letters on "Planned" line
2/79 and, as steps are completed, indicate key letters on "Actual" line.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT (Part III SIS) State Wisconsin
AIR PROGRAMS BRANCH - EPA REGION V Month April. 1980
I.
SANCTIONAELE SIPS
CRITERIA
POLLUTANTS
Primary TSP (Sec
Major Approvabili
Major Approvabili
03/CO/NQ?
Major Approvabili
APPROVA3ILITY
ISSUES
mdary TSP extension request proposal
ANTICIPATED RESOLUTION
NATURE DAT"
n 7/6/79 PR)
;y Issues: None
ty Issues: None
ty Issues: .None
-
•
II. STATIC:rZiT SOURCE PERMITS
PSD
coMPLin r .»: r ETERMINATIONS
NUM3Z?. COMPLETE
THIS MCirTH
2
NUMBER
OVERDUE
0
FINAL DETERMINATIONS
YEAR
TO
DATE
2
THIS
MONTH
0
INCOMPLETE: g
IN-HOUSE FOR:
UP TO
120 DAYS
0
0
120 TO
ISO DAYS
2*
0
OVER 6
MONTHS
3*
0
III. DELEGATIONS ACCOMPLISHED THIS MONTH: PSD - partial delegation request
2/79 * Application on inactive status pending additional information.
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS III 3
Part III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT State WISCQNSIN-
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V Month MAY 1980
I. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Status of State Efforts to Prepare for Open Dump Inventory (narrative)
Inventory priorities are being set, staff trained; inspections and
determinations have begun this Spring.
B. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Regions
Completed March 27, 1978.
C. Status of State Efforts to Identify Implementing Agency
(bmpleted March 27, 1978.
II. HAZARDOUS t/ASTE MANAGEMENT
A. Has state expressed intention to seek authorization to operate the
program? X Yes No Comments: Expressed February 14. 1979.
B. Does legislative authority exist for the program? X Yes No
If no, comment:
C. ' Status of state regulations development; Regulations tied directly
to promulgation of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
III. STATUS OF URBAN RESOURCE RECOVERY GRANTS
Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority—Region II (Wausau-Stevens Pt.)
— grant awarded August 20, 1979.
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (narrative) ^'sconsin has no State noise control
program, (cont'd.)
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (narrative) All of the Region V State
Radiological Emergency Response Plans (RERP) have to be reviewed (cont'd.]
2/79
-------
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STATE WISCONSIN
PART III PROGRAM STATUS REPORT MONTH MAY
WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH - USEPA - REGION V —— -
s-'
IV. STATUS OF NOISE PROGRAM (.cont'd.) ^
We are supporting an ECHO (Each Community Helps Others) program in West -
ATMs. The recipients are Madison and Waukesha County. We are also
providing technical assistance, equipment loan, and training.
V. STATUS OF RADIATION PROGRAMS (cont'd.)
again using the Federal Emergency Management Administration's (FEMA)
revised criteria. The Wisconsin RERP is currently under review and a
State visit was made on April 17 to discuss the review results with the
State.
-------
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT - III
AIR AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PESTICIDES BRANCH - EPA V
State l/fl
Month
III 4
April
19SO
I. ENFORCEMENT AGREEMENT:
Status of Grant Grant awarded 9/22/79
Amount of Grant $151,559
Enforcement
Activities
Use Inspections
Producer Establishments
Inspected
Producer Establishment
Samples Collected
Marketplace Samples
Collected
Import
Investigations
Civil Complaints
Notices of Arrival
Reviewed
Import Detentions
Stop Sale, Use or
Removal Orders
Criminal Referrals
Recalls Initiated
EPA
This
Month1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
Year L
Comn-
to 1.
na,0 iitinerd
0
2
2
1
0
0
22
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
STATE
This
Month
0
1
2
0
Xear
to
_Date
8
2
3
0
Commi-
:raent
139
35
60
90
TOTAL
This
Month
0
1
2
0
Year u _
to Tirl-
Dai-o £.._=_-
8 139'
4 35
5 60
1 90
II. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
Amount of Grant $35,000 (proposed) Mid-Year Evaluation conducted 4/17/80
Status of Training Program Activity: 2 phase 1 session - 25 trained
3 phase 2 sessions - 111 trained
III Quantify and describe indicators of health problems reported as result of
pesticides misuse during month: none
IV. Special local Meed Requests Received: none rec'd in April; 1 rec'd year to date
2/79
-------
SPA - 3EGI3SJ V
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
;?ATER - PART III
"IT *""*
1,1:5
III 5
STATE Wisconsin
DATE May 5, 1930
Page 1 of 3 Page (3)
SCHEDULE
PROJECT NA'4E ORi:
(list)
"CURRENT
DELAY
Recent Cumulative
(weeks) (TIOS)
REASON FOR OEL^Y
(Recent/Cumulative)
Maiison
F 11/77 3/30
33
ilwaukee
0 9/77
3/30
10/30
37
Lake Geneva
D 5/79
5/31
24
Cu-nulative-On going review
of technical issues at
OMR. Awaiting infoc-
•nation fcoTi State and
grantee. Mso, *\WT
review will be necessary.
Allowances Tiade for '/TO^R
ani inhouse review.
Additional Step 1 work
required to address
DEIS and WCNR questions.
Delay in initating
the additional work.
Cumu1ative-De1ays attri-
buted to combining of
Comprehensive and C30
513's, and resultant
contract 'nodifications.
Delays in completion
of Facilities Plan.
Cumulative-Continued
delay of facilities
planning information.
The amendment request
awaiting .OMR review.
Facilities Planning
consultant falling
behind on starting
on volume 2 of F.P.
Grantee's consultant's
delay in developing
facilities olan.
- Draft
- Final
Recent - Delays since orevious reoort
-------
Ill 5
EPA - RS3IOM 7
REGO1AL PROGR\:4 STATUS REPORT
rtATER - PART III
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
313
STATE Wisconsin
DATE ^lay 5, 1930
page 2 Of 3 page(s)
SCHEDULE
ORIG
DELAY
CURRENTT
(list)
RECENT
(weeks)
:UB1ULATIVE
(mos)
REASON FOR DELAY
(Recent/Cumulative
St. Croix
Falls/Taylors
Falls
0 9/79
7/80
10
Portage
F 1/79
5/80
16
Facilities Planning
consultant experienc-
ing problems in
raceiving funds.
Cirnu 1 a t iva- c on t inuei
dalay of facilities plan-
ning information. Due
to facilities planners
not developing
alternatives. This
is a piggyback
El3. The Schedule
is tied to the
facilities plan. Four
month delay due to
Facilities Planners not
developing alternatives.
Everything is reason-
ably on time.
Racent- Contractor slow
progress in completing
final product.
Cumulative-Meed to com-
plete site specific
facilities planning
work. Delays in
printing. Additional
analysis necessary
to find a new site
that does not have
wetlands. Additional
- Draft
? - Final
Recent - Delays submitted to EPA since previous report
-------
III 5
EPA - REGION V
PROGRAM STATUS REPORT
III
SIS
3TATE
DATE
page
Wisconsin
:iay 5,
3 of 3
1930
page(s)
PROJECT
(list)
SCHEDULE
QRIG
DEIAY
FOR OSIAY
CURRENT
RECENT
(weeks)
CCT-FJIATWE
( Recant /Cumulative
Gibraltar
[Dooc County)
D 1/80
9/80
analysis on watlands
& PC3's is necessary.
Delays in obtaining
EIS contract ani
revisions to con-
tract and additional
data needs to resolve
land application
issues.
Qrnulative-Further facili-
ties planning delay.
Setback resulting froii
delay in submission
of facilities plan by
consultants.
'.tote: The facilities plan-
ners are going to finish tn^
facilities plan and have
the public hearing with no
further El3 coordination.
This usans that we no longer
are doiig a concurrent SIS
and all work on the 513 is
delayed until after the
facilities plan is COTI-
oletad.
- Draft
F - Final
Recent - Delays submitted to EP^ since orevious reoort
-------
USEPA - REGION V
V7ATER - SIS PART III
REGIONAL PROGRAM STATUS REPORT FOPJM
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
III 7
State Wisconsin
I. . 208
Month May
1980
208 Agencies
(list)
Wisconsin DNP,
FVKQPA
DCRPC
WDNR
SEWEFC
DCPPC
FvTvQPA
WDNR
VvDNR
Status of (For example, has the plan been certified?
208 Plan approval granted by EPA? dollars amount of
ongoing grant? general scope of effort?
outstanding issues? If in house, when will
review be corrpleted? Is anyone holding UD reviev?
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $312,250
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $257,000
FY 80 Section 203 Grant Award: $ 42,167
FY 80 Section 208 Grant Award: $ 54,189
On April 4 water quality management plans reviewed and submitted
for approval:
Manitowoc River Basin
Buf f alo-Trernpaaleau River Basin
Upper Wisconsin River Basin (Non-Point Elements only)
Rock River Basin (Kon-Point Source elements only)
Plan reviewed and submitted for approval.
Plan approved.
Plan elements for NPS reviewed and submitted for approval.
Lower Manitowoc Priority Watershed Plan prepared and selected
for funding under the USDA "RC-7P" program. (Lower iManitowoc
is part of the Manitowoc River WOM Plan.
. USEPA awarded $250,000 to the WDNR to study Phosphorus and
water quality standards as was agreed to in the FY 79 SEA.
l
l
II. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Describe state activity related to standards revision, time-frame, and
regional strategy being pursued:
WDNR has begun working on developing a new classification system and new
guidance for clcissifyinT lev flcr-' :-•• ure,--3 in ":; scor..~ari.
2/79
-------
Gt/c
s *
^5*
1 —,
_^ o"
o" o
rt- 0
> 1
^ ""^
OJ rt
Oi 3
CT rh
1
rc is
o>
Q.
ro
£
n
0
Q.
fO
(D
3
QJ
<-h
^
O-
3
^
(D
t/>
-^
n
t-h
0)
t
T
0
T
O
^,
d
V.
n
o
K
-1
^V
§
PI
3
r;
"^
^j
:o
>
-h
3-
D
-s
-1-
-ti
O
-s
**i"
3"
_J.
s>
3
O
Q
-s
~*
3
•y
U
/}
3
'
T>
T)
3
OT '**.
r- ':;i
i — '
CO
O
O
*
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
^
0
-3 • ' ' ~
ii .' " r
S
,w
CO
o
o
*
0
„
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
55
0
lr. I-'.
o
r-. -J
ro
-•j
UD
cn
4
ro
*
o
0
o
.0
o
0
o
o
1 — '
1 '
OJ
en
00
CO ••
8 &
» c
O 7-
w
n < c
c: <~> '-
s: o
K t"
rr ^»
~ 3
CO
<: ;?
j— 4 C
0 C
r- tr
> P
•H S
O
CO 1
H <
CO f
X "-
§ §
H c/
-~
o a
s^ i— <
H CO
M
PI
W W
H M
PI O
is
H CO
"~
•<
3 PI
m ^
o
o ^s
n "
O R
>-J ?3
^
^* '-J
O ™
-) »
r)
o
en
H
«_j
Pi
5
H
O
« H
) >
> f
i E |
n 3
M tn
S 53
H
o a
C*3 O
; o ^<
- O M
^ t^ ••*
3 " 73
1 1-H
3 H PI
33d
i -z.
H
: 55 2
3 2 H
> rn 53
3 o c:
•> n\ n
IJ
0
2
i—
^
C-
^-^
c
c.
c
tn
|
o
01
P
c
en
ro
h~
en
on
^j
n
o
H
O
CO
c/;
S
;,
O
»
^-i
C
5
?*
Q
^T"
r"~
52
r^*
pc
0
•^
> g
w n
S 5
^5 ^
o
0 ~j
E5 ^
M S
I-J
§ 3
-^ 5C
G "^
1 "-3
a
pi -(
T3 ft
^>
JO
ri co
O CO
^
co
a
rr
a
Oi
n
o
U)
=3
5"
3
3-
1=
-3
~J.
'
K->
CO
O
3 III
-------
n
o
1
z ? 5
i-1 H 3
cn pi ca
50 pi
E~ o
cn ti
n > cn
rS" " "°
?, as
fD on
z
c
2
33
PI
73
O
o
f
cn
-3
n M§ P
Oi a
to 5
N
o" i
a
f
n
H
O
cn
z
G
p}
?o
>,
2
0
H
n
°
„,
cn
H
O
3
o
T
^
CJ
C/l
§
6
|
g
H
t — ^ ^
. '~" -.
^ fD
O -h
ff>
> -i.
rfr O
r
C
;
n
<<
+• n>
3
5 O
3 -h
i
o'
_^
— I 00 73 B)
oo a o <•*
^^ ^^ j
i i
a 0
3
1
000
O
ro
-5
-s
O>
^^
to
rh
O
O
O
EU
to
cn
c
Oi
-s
Q.
^— ^
OO
fO
n
c-h
O
3
v**J
^^^
'
,
q
o
z
cn
O
<
.j.
— '
5:3
O
ri-
o'
3
1
O
*
M
3
m
O
§
flj
H-
O
3
MI
i-t
0
3
to
0}
rr
to
0
p"
r*
ft
11
h-
•<
25
O
3
n
o
3
"3
i—
a
n
o
73
ro
-3
o
rr
Fl
<
d>
t— *
C
U
rr
O
3
*
Tl
O
i-T
3
M
fD
3
O
n
o
3
3
r»
y
O
rr
O
3
CO
rr
3>
?T
3
U
33
V
h*-
3
cn
rr
cn
i-j
Q
Q.
C
(D
01
3
C*
-^
H-
3
C3
H*
O
Mi
(--
(5
3
rr
<
O
I-1
Oi
o
0 Z
M O
cn Z
Cl I
> c
53 Z
O rt
pi r:
73 i— i
cn ^3
c-
CT>
O
• 1
C
00
ro
cn
o 2:
i-i e
cn 2
O 1-1
p> i-<
73 -d
o •>
pi r-
^
cn
CO
O
^J
O
io
i
— '
cn
O
PI O Z
-=1 73 O
53 r*i
73 7=
£ o o
PI O Z
oi 1 §
1 0^ ^
^
^j
CO
o" —
CO
o
OO
on
— o z
'n g O
° 1J =
P! 0 0
° i 1
P o° o
£
cn
cn
o"^
ji
o
H M cn p:
o s o 5
H PI G t_
> Z 73 O
t- H 0 53
»-i PI
PI
O
J-l
G P) O
Z M f
M Z >
i-i > H
cn t- M
O
cn <
n w
« o
PI r-
a >
f M
PI Z
cn c~>
< pi ") >
HI MI M n
0 -=1 Z rt
r .- > 3
> G t- >
CD Z
™ H
cn
< cn >
I-H n O
0 3 >-i
f PI G
> a >
H e f
o p<
cn
< Pi "1
1— 1 ^ M
0 t) z
r1 f >
> G r"
i-i PI
i-i Z
O i-J
z
cn
S n
r* pi
> c
H G
O P!
z
cn
3 3 > T|
O G n PI
Z 73 i-i C
H M I-l PI
= si?
cn c-
3> •*!
n p:
H o
o°c5
O z >
cn p-
»<
CO
o
o
2
^M
1
H
CO
> "1
O X
o
IS
r* 1-1
•-i O
cn
H 5
2 P]
w
*
* "
* B
pi
PJ
z
c
r.
PJ
3
PI
z
I-i
n
H
o
z
cn
p;
c
p;
>
n
TIONS
2 o" o M
C3 t— rr Z
B O U
" u. 0
TJ P Wi ^
pi cn r*
n ^ i-1 >
PI * 1— Z
Z * 0
H PI
cn
H
H
P!
PI
-3
**
z
5
PI
pa
o
^
z
a:
*o
o
o
cn
0
p)
cn
H
a
PI
cn
O
53
n
z
H
(n
O
73
H
Z f"^
o «
to
o
o
T3
-S
OT III
-------
OT III
Issued
Rema i n
Modif i
ro -••
Q_ 3 '—
to -n
*-"»» -<^
™T1 **~*+
-< Tl '
-< 10
i £Q
LO ' £"**>
co in- — •
O CO
>— o
1X3
1X3 -p. 1X5
ro -P>
CO •£» CO
0 — ' 0
~
r~
o
i
,2
c:
o
i=
i —
rr
o
m
73
\ —
°" ~"Sr«
<<3|
S5|
CU -SJ5
i— *• m en
~ \ u
ro o.
O
-.. 0T1
3 ^H
rl- 30
£»>*
__ . l^J
ro c. ij"j
i *— \ ^^
— j« Q ^ j
-5 -5fe
rt-aH
0 Cu
X T3Q
_.. (TjO
0 TZ
cn 32
c -iO
rf J*"*
~ "
(/) 1
rl- ts>*0
O) &
3 SO
O -J-CTJ
ro rtjjs
O S
O CT"
3 — '
rt" ro/"-\
-S 0>3
O OtB
— ' 3Tt
-J.I1
ro 3Ca
— h to rt
-h H-
O 0<
-5 -sro
rl" ^•-^
• o
**•?
el-
s' G"3
ro o
-s o
O-
-o
O Cu
rt- 0-
ro <
3 0)
rt- 3
->• o
cu ro
ro
rt- 3
0 rt
X
O 3
CU
3 -O
rt- -5
O
T3 tQ
-s -s
o ai
cr 3
ro 3~
3 cu
to to
f^
w
ro
co ro
O 3
ro o
n
-Q O
c c
ro -s
to -5
rl- -"•
_j, -^
O tQ
3 •
Cu
to -o
-5
i— *- (Tl
Ci ^-*
0 0
ro
cr (/>
Cu to
n
TT ro
<
tr> cu
-"• C
O_ QJ
^. (— f-r
3 -"•
UD 0
3
~° * r«
"S 3 W
0 0_£3
"2 S
-S -"'P
1 rfw
3
2
o> cu O
to to Tl
CT3T>
i^S
^ ^~ ^ -
-a crM
!±3!5
O O M
"=l
_.. 0 g
3 Hz
ro O'H
-S Q.13
— i 5=3
<< O O
23P
CU P0>
"< 1 S
(X3--
<0
1 x^v
•o cos
c ota
cr - I
— • i n
_•. (a
O 3>rr
— 'H*
0 — •<
o ro
3 "o v^
ro o
3 CT 73
rt* ^^ ro
st ro t)
3 ro
rt- to — '•
O <
cu ro
D_-O O-
CU T3
rt- ro rl-
ro cu 3"
-s ro
O) -".
n to ro
30-5
rt- — ' CU
• < rt-
ro ro
a.
• -a
-5
ro
c: ri-
3 -5
—> ro
ro cu
(/i g-
V) 3
ro
3" 3
ro rt-
Ol
-s -a
llrjt ^
3 O
tQ tQ
-s
_i. Cu
01 3
-< _J.
i
ro 3
_O
"1 1
-:s' ol
ro i
Q. C-.
v Cu
3
ro c
X Cu
"O "3
ro <<
o
rt-
STATU
FACIL
H en
H
MS 0
Tl
*d
M O
?3 PJ
LEGATION i
MIT PROGR-
V 0
S Tl
Tl
/••» PJ
3 0
(B W
H pa
H >
BI r*
rt
H-
<
ro
x^
2: 3=>
0 C
< rt-
ro 3"
3 o
O" ~5
ro -"•
~l rt
*<
ro
cn rt
- o
iO to
~~J (/>
to c
• ro
T3
ro
-s
~J*
rt-
to
rt
O
Tl
ro
Q-
ro
-s
Cu
-h
Cu
O
— i
«j*
rt-
ro
to
Q-
ro
ro
IQ
o>
rt-
ro
Q.
o
3
NON-
MUNIC
H
*0
>
r1
cn
o
cn
o
o
—i
-n
m
3> 0
z m
a po
3=
3 1 —
*— '
"Z. "^
O >
73 C-.
O
73
-^1
— 1
O
o
S
s~* G
*TJ Z
O M
H n
SC M
- TI
CO >
>-» f
CO
o
--J
~>1
CO
o
-"• O
to 3
01 ro
c
ro ro
a. x
tj
3 ~S
ro
3 CL
o>
<< T3
• ro
— i -j.
S rt-
o
s
-a cu
ro to
3 ~a
— J« r*
rt- cr
to — *
CU O
-s
ro 3
o
C rt
Q, r>
ro a>
-i a.
ro cu
3 3
-h 0-
0 -
T S
O -i.
i z;
ro
3 cr
<-+ ro
•
Tl 2
R C
1-
en
TOTAL
MAJOR
SOURCES
IDENTIFIED
Tl C=l M Z
M Tl cn C
pa T) cn S
S w a as
M o ra PJ
H H O JO
en M
< >
M Z
O
PI Z Tl Z
Tl O PJ G
TJ H pa 2
w 2 a
O M PJ
H H JS
M cn
<3 O
PJ Tl
pa cn »* Z
Tl M C
T) Z PJ 2
O O Tl W
pa pi Ti PI
H PJ ?o
r4 o
> H M
cn 1-1 en
H < en
PJ G
PJ
O
o
0
w
z
H
cn
§
25
O
Z
1
H~l
CO
cn
1
n
PJ
cn
Z M *d
T3 Z W
cn ?a M
o H
>TJ PJ
33 S
§z 5
w H 52
» s
D FJ
o
3
CO
M
en
ICO
o
o
o
3
CO
o
-------
Organics Regulations State Region-wide
Water
Division
Branch Water Supply
Date May 7, 1980
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Instructions for Completion of this Form;
Please use the following format to summarize special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERSr-all publics concerned or involved with the'issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update rn this issue.
Summary of Issue:
On February 9, 1978, EPA proposed a regulation for the control of synthetic organic
contamination of industrial origin. Sixty-two indicator organic materials were named
as being possibly associated with such contamination, and granular activated carbon
(GAC) treatment was proposed as the best available means of removing .these contaminants
from drinking water. Design criteria were designated for the GAC treatment. A simul-
taneous proposal was made to limit trihalomethane contamination to 10 ppb in drinking
water. Such contamination develops as a result of reactions between the treatment
chemical, chlorine, and naturally present organics.
ckground:
Region V has 55 water systems possibly affected by the regulation. No laboratories
have been certified for the necessary organic analyses. Laboratory methods have
not been established beyond the research laboratory to give the sensitivity impor-
tant to drinking water analyses. The trihalomethane (TTHM) regulation appears to
be of small importance to Region V, in that no large systems to which the proposal
was limited have been shown to have high TTHM levels present.
Perception on Issues:
To properly consider variance requests, Region V personnel must be familiar with the
tests required and should be confident in the results of such tests. Lacking standard-
ized methods and certified laboratories, the only dependable source for such information
would appear to be highly specialized laboratories such as those operated by the Central
Regional Laboratory. The Region V Water Supply Branch has determined to carry out a
study defining organic water quality in 30 water systems most likely to be affected by
industrial contamination.
Involved Characters:
Region V, States, selected water utilities.
Update:
now lags 2 months on preparation of certification guidelines for trihalomethane
. This is now becoming a; critical issue with Ohio EPA especially concerned
about our credibility and their cooperative stance. The treatment effects specialist
has begun gathering data for early TTHM investigative work in Indiana and Ohio.
-------
State. 2_
Enforcement
Divson
* ^;~ 'T"'i '
:. ration ' -''" '
Dace
USEPA-REGIGN V - ^J^^
Instr uc tions
...._---...
Please use the following f one at to summer i~e special problems requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the ISSUED, a section, providing the EACKGJROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the X^Z2HM
CAST_ QF^ CHARACTERS— all public concerned or involved with the issue, and the pro-
Jected~RESOLUTldN of the issue. As new information develops, other problems arise,
or psrc"aptions~ch~ar.gs, please indicate this on the the monthly update on this issue.
_l_ss_jc - 1. States are having moderate to severe resource problems in establishing
their ";PDF_S pretreat'ient programs. 2. The Region, has a very tight schedule in 'che
Srate pretreat :enr program del cget ion process,
_Bdc^grojjnd - TPA's oretreat -lent. rag1.; lotions (June 1973) require all iVPCFS Spates to
establisn and iriplen.ent a p;-et reagent prcoruji. 'Jnere State legal authority exist.:;,
they were to apply to operate the pretreatrnent pregrai by ilarch 27, 1979. If auchor-
ity is not in place, i:he State has up to March 1930 to apply- 1-,'hile preliminary steps
could be taken, the magnitude of the Drogra.n for larger States is ths major is"i;e,
E general, done a;, outs ton:^ ng job o~ laying
out and scai-t^rg to gea:" up and -ie/e :,he pro-yc'i, he,/ever, full i'^pl e i.ontc :i ui of
L"/en a .ni.TMTUTi prezr e;t;nont jjrogrc.;-; -nil severely t>';< tlva States' scarring level, 'A~
rire raced with this najor issue i/.;1/ because oi; tiie rarcri /7 lc/9, rr,]u'I atory r^po1"'; i ug
require nents of eoi'Tntti >,g futu'e resource: by tiie States.
The pretreai:T;ent -egt'l at ^ois :;low :.'-\^ tO-days to rule en a State's apo! i cation, wh^eh
includes publication in the gg2de_raj ReoiGtrv ana sowe 2iJ!--dOG r.e-;spapers, along with
a 15-day public cc'ruv-em; period T ;;ee"tfng"The tire renui recent, pariicul ar!y cbtaining
tvnely Headquarters '"or:currenee, v, i! i rec;uire spec i a1 handling anJ close socoe^a tin-,.
Proposed cnanges 1:1 the regulations w'll reouce the public co;n;nent oeri^d to SO ,137-;,
Resent Heajguayre.-s rewora wiun res'1 c~> :ts Xejrons tc Go cays total to process acec:ec-
l:l'/9-Litci_^AiLJ:iL^Jll^clCLJ>
-------
State
REGION WIDE IV 2
Division Air & Hazardous Ma ten'a"
Branch
Date
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
Pesticide
4/4/79
Instructions for Completion of this Form:
Please use the following format to suzsiarise.special problems requiring attention:
Include a. description summarizing the ISSUE, a section providing the BACKGROUND
on the problem, issue or perceptions on the issue, and a section on the INVOLVED
CAST OF CHARACTERS-r-all publics concerned or involved with the issue. As new
information develops, other problems arise, or perceptions change, please indicate
this in the monthly update on this issue.
Issue:
Background:
Cast of
Characters
Pesticide Enforcement Agreement outputs
The 1978 FIFRA Amendments gave the states enforcement primacy (Sec. 26]
as of this date, three states (Michigan, Minnesota and Indiana with
Enforcement Agreement/Grants) have automatic use primacy.
Illinois and Wisconsin have also been granted primacy pursuant to an
effective Sec. 4 applicator certification plan. Ohio has indicated
that state cooperation with the Administrator's Emergency Suspension
Order of 2/28/79 (2,4,5-T and Silvex) would be extremely limited.
Consequently, the Agency is presently considering denying use primacy
to Ohio because of this reluctance to cooperate. This matter must
be resolved as soon as possible.
Illinois - Dwight Dunbar, Chief, Bureau of Plant & Apiary Protection
Illinois Dept. of Agriculture
Indiana - L. 0. Nelson, Pesticide Administrator, Office of
Indiana State Chemist
Michigan - Dean Lovitt, Chief, Plant Industry Division, Michigan
Department of Agriculture
Minnesota - Tom McConnell, Acting Director, Agronomy Services,
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Ohio - Oren Spilker, Specialist in Charge, Pesticide Regulation,
Ohio Department of Agriculture
Wisconsin- William Simmons, Chief, Bureau of Special Services,
Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
f/79
-------
IV
S tate Wis cons in
Division Water
Branch Water Quality Management
Date April 3, 1979
USEPA - REGION V - SPECIAL ISSUES
ISSUE: The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Comnission is recaimending in
their Water Quality Management Plan that 18 public sewage treatment facil-
ities within their region rsnove phosphorus so as to achieve an effluent
phosphorus level of 0.1 mg/1. These 18 facilities have a combined capacity
of 70 mgd.
BACKGROUND
The problems perceived by the public, the U.S. EPA and the Wisconsin DNR with
these recommendations are:
1) It has not been totally proven that a public treatment plant can reach an
effluent discharge level of 0.1 mg/1 of phosphorus for a monthly average.
There are plants that have been reaching these levels of treatment but most
are experimental in nature and the results have not been conclusive. There
is also some question as to the efficacy of the process train. The plan
recommends a two-stayed lime clarification process much like the types used
in water purification systems producing potable public water supplies.
2) The costs involved in implementing the additional treatment units will be
substantially higher than for conventional phosphorus removal. The addi-
tional units will add an estimated $48 million dollars in capital costs
and $4.8 million dollars in annual operation and maintenance costs.
Additionally these costs were computed using 1976 as the base year.
3) The SEWRPC Plan is at considerable variance from what the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources recommends. They are the State water pollution control
agency and they recommend 1.0 mg/1. The International Joint Commission, an
international body established to protect the integrity of the Great Lakes
also recommends 1.0 mg/1 of phosphorus in effluent discharges into the basins
of Lakes Superior, Huron and Michigan and 0.5 mg/1 into the basins of Lakes
Erie and Ontario.
4) Individuals and organizations also question if the 0.1 mg/1 effluent
limitation will result in in-stream water quality improvements. It
has been pointed out that if influent phosphorus is reduced then a
water body, in re-establishing homeostasis, will begin releasing
phosphorus from the benthos which will mitigate many of the desired
results that the 0.1 mg/1 effluent limitation was designed to achieve.
4/79
-------
IV 5 b
Also, the reduction in available phosphorus should curtail algal blooms,
however, this may facilitate and accelerate the establishment of rooted
macrophytes.
5) The computer model that SEWRPC utilized, HYDROCOMP, has been criticized
in its projections for water quality improvements resulting from limiting
phosphorus in the effluent. Its detractors claim that other models,
namely QUAL III, or the Vollerweider-OECD eutrophication model are more
useful and would give more realistic results.
INVOLVED CAST OF CHARACTERS
The major participants in this issue are:
U.S. EPA, both Region V and Washington B.C. national offices.
Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
The 18 affected, either existing or proposed, treatment plants.
Donahue and Associates, Consulting Engineers.
Various public interest groups.
The residents of the seven counties within the SEWRPC area.
The U.S. EPA, Region V, will have the ultimate responsibility to approve and
oversee the plan implementation. However, if the plan is approved by EPA
and WDNR it becomes binding and will have obvious impacts upon the "201"
Construction Grants Program of U.S. EPA.
The level of phosphorus removal is advanced waste treatment (AWT) which is now
being closely scrutinized by both EPA Headquarters and the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). The current trend is to reduce the enormous costs involved
in AWT and each AWT proposal is being screened, on a case by case basis, to
see if it is cost-effective.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources will have to enforce both the
areawide plan and the phosphorus effluent limitations and this may prove to
be very costly, unwieldly and not politically sound.
Donahue and Associates, a Milwaukee based consulting firm, specializes in the
public wastewater treatment plants. They have recently notified all of the
18 communities or sanitary districts that will be affected by the 0.1 mg/1
limitation, and have called upon them to defeat the acceptance and implemen-
tation of the SEWRPC Areawide Water Quality Management plan. At this date
their motives for moving this way are not clear.
The 18 Communities which may be affected are:
1) Brcokfield, City of
2) Burlington, City of
3) Cedarburg, City of
4) Delafield - Hartland Water Pollution Control Commission
5) Dousman, Village of
L/7Q
-------
IV 5 c
6) Dover-Eagle, Town of, lake Sewer Utility District
7) Hartford, City of
8) Jackson, Village of
9) Mukwanago, Village of
10) Norway, Town of, Sanitary District No. 1
11) Oconomowoc, City of
12) Salem, Town of, Sanitary District No. 2
13) Slinger, Village of
14) Union Grove, Village of
15) Walworth County Metropolitan Sewage District
16) Waukesha, City of
17) West Bend, City of
18) Whitewater, City of
There are numerous public interest groups that have strong feelings both for
an against the phosphorus limitations and the general public will have to
hear the additional costs that this effluent limit will generate; $48 million
in additional capital costs and $4.8 million in annual operation and maintenance
costs.
4/79
-------
Division.
Branch
Mav 1979
Date
USEPA-REGION V - OPfiCIAL ISSUES
Ins true tions f or _Cc:ng lat:ion_ _ol ^ _t n ift_ _? crrc
Please use the following format to surcn.?ri2s special prcbleis requiring attention:
Include a description summarizing the JL^SjJIib^ a section providing tbe £,ACK_^RpU_irD_
on the problem, issue or perceptions c>~_- ths iscuf:, and a section On the- ibIVjjiA;£jj
CAST OF CHARACTERS—all public concerned or involved with the issue. and the pro-
jected RESOLUTION of the issue. .As nev information davelors, other problem arise ,
or perceptions change, please indicate this on the the monthly up data on thr'i isr-v.-a.
ISSUE:
As a result of disci: scion1? '"il~h tl-o '.'J dconsin ^KR concerning the I Ml -nub-e bTS i_-j
development of a benrrarcbj n ,-f .' >-, re .Tie n .; with WDMR on lJEPA/bbDA c oofc' !•-.•-' i f or . f vr,
necessity for a public rearing fol"l_p_:;in^ che release of t. flu
Administrative Ccd3 allows then the option of holding the bbP^ recr.c J.rtn hear L:'-p, in
conjunction with the NE^A nearing on jhe draft LI 3, WbbR h'jj nade a policy d-:.<-.is: en
requiring the hearing after the Final bbS, Given the active public i.ivolv-mcr.t pro?,i:-
for the facilities plan and EIS oroce?:-^ tc :_s dcubtf-j' tha*~ a public: hsarinf per se
will be of itiuch vfl"£. Th _- 30-day p?t:'.->r. 5 :•> _• ?. O'--i op, the final bl^ -'bculd b? ,-:u ':f ic •• cui:
opportunity for public respor.se, The i.-^.y\:\ i^i-iif is so;r:e-'b"^ velvto.c -
that draft and fi>:,ii ETS's ;.iist net he 'i. . u. :uj cjci:;ion :inbb«;; JocvnienL1-
EIS's should only b:- one. :;f che F-cr^c'> us:-d to r^ach a ru»_;'s-; ^ ., ibis
this Region's intr-qrc tic:: of rb- Jc-ci: i ^r .^bcin; aiid blS procss-ioa,
BACKGROUNj):
While VBNR has indicated th^c tbe- w
on other EIS's, it ] paves the >'i]vcub >e .v.j'7> ..n ,1 t. coition jf ,;>vit ui'c ir t:a^ uc1.' sbcus
the conclusion o<" it:; Sier 1 proc,= rS. V.):T\ c •;.--, not wan: Co C«.O--LC itself to fiiix
specific time period for nakia^, t'r^. /_.;• •.? 11 ic.; p" :.r; c^rrr- VT- I r-c.-i'ic r, f ol.-0'.'i.n^ the
final EIS. They will onl:, ,,.--r^--> L-J> .- ;;b^ rie c';L;^ion ",_.:; ,:;ui':bi- c.r po--.'-i'. i , " ,
Although we can ::c sr rucn-r,? o'
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(1), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual_or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:$151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative enforcement grant is to the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture,
Trade and Consumer Protection, to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 & 9 of FIFRA
and (2) upgrade the state envorcement program by increasing laboratory cap-
ability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
The semi-annual review was conducted on April 17, 1980. The report supports
the states' competence in meeting all program commitments provided that state
imposed mileage restrictions do not restrict inspectional activity.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRAf-!T APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Haste Management Branch
Authorizing Section'La';: Section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery ,flct
of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: October 30, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 799,003 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 447,531 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support the eventual development of a fully authorized
hazardous waste management program, as defined by regulations mandated by
Section 3006 of RCRA. In States unable to obtain authorization by a specific
time, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency will use these funds to operate the
program in that State. Some of the activities that are developmental in nature
include: resource assessment; legal and regulatory development; permit and
manifest system development; expansion of surveillance and enforcement programs;
public participation; abandoned site and emergency response programs.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS RFPORT - GRANTS AMH/On GP"!r APPLICATIONS
State of l-lisconsin--K'isconsin Solid '-laste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management P.ranch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Population served: 255,000
Brief Description of project or program covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for Lincoln,
Marathon, Port-ije, and Wood Counties (Wausa'.i-Stevens Point area), having a com-
bined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
Feasibility v/ork has been progressing since September 1979. In-house staff has
completed quantity anj composition task. Markets for recycled products are
currently being investigated. An eighteen (18) month initial phase anticipated.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GP/UiTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISIO'!: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003 (a)(l); Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: October 30, 1979 (actual)
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 1,261,750 (actual)
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 370,350 (actual)
(Actual or p
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program covered:
This grant is awarded to support an inventory of land disposal facilities based
on Federal criteria, and development of State Solid Wasta Management Plans, as
defined in regulations mandated by Section 4002 of RCRA. States must meet
certain planning requirements in the regulations in order to remain eligible for
funding. These planning requirements include: the formal identification of
responsible solid waste management agencies at all levels of government;
development of legal and regulatory authorities over land disposal, based upon
the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to resource recovery;
and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.
MAR 1980
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
State officials have agreed to monthly reporting of grant outputs.
Final group training will be held on March 27 and 28.
MAR 1980
-------
STATU3 RIIPO-T - GRAFTS A.iiy'pP. ';p.AN'i A.;:''.IC.f-.TIONS
State of Wisconiin ,
DIViSICN: /\ir an(j Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l), FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
WIDATCP officials have agreed to monthTy reporting.
INSTRUCTIONS:
v%
1. CompTete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
?.. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
FEB 1980
-------
State of
Wisconsin
DIVISICH: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
«
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4003(a)(l); Rosour.-s Conse-Cation .ic-d Recovery :-
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: •
(Actual or anticipated) October 30, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount:
(Aciuo}_or proposed)
1.251-.750
• 370,350
Brief description of project or prc'irav covered: This grant is awarued to suppor,
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^'raria, and Jevelcprr.en'c
of Stats Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulat^'jtis ii!£ndat2J by Ssc- '
tion 4CQ2 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirp.^nts in thj reg^U- '
tions In order to remain eligible for funding. These piannirj rpouirciins.its include'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management, accncies at all
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory'aut^r-5 ties ov.^r land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal in;p-2Jirrents to
resource recovei-y; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi ig permits.-
If (STRUCT IONS: ;
1. Coir.plete forms, by State;, for aVI p^ojor: or r'vrin u .ti, &'
or urKfcr consi^deratian, within that Stata (include c; ;,,its to loce c
local uCinciGS, planning agencies, others)
•i
2. Do n.0j% include FY 1930 pro'.;r.^ grants or r_.n-,.-".tion yi c; .
3. Treat each supplemental reqviest separately.
-------
\
f.t.«ry.r - i-K-VMa A.TJ/OK PP/V.'
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
' BRAtlCl: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation flrid Recovery A"t of
f . . 197(5 (RCRA) u.
Date of Award: *
i1 (Actual of anticipated), October 30, 1979 • i"/
Total Project Cost: * |
(Actual or proposed) 799.903 I
Federal Grant Amount: . i
(Actual or proposed) 447,'531 1
Brief description of project or program-covered: Tl.is gran* is awarded ro -UP- '•"
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazcirdou' -var.te nnna-ienvnY !'
program as defined by regulation irandated by Section 3CJ6 of rKCR-r\. in it'»*«s •'
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tine, t!ie iJ. S. r.ivlronnianurPro- '
lection Agency will use these fends to operate the program ir that State. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature incite: re-source 'S-.-^srent-
legal and'regulatory developmsnt; permit and manifest system Jc-iVfilopni-ntTeApan-
-sion o, surveillance and enforcement proor^ms; public partic-'jaf on'- :
abandoned site and emergency response proyT-a.ns. • •,.
fi"
•" * ' ).i'.
i* '
V
i, -
\
•"INSTRUCTIONS: ' :
1. Complete forms, by Statev for all project or r^-oara.-n c ;pts, a'.tive {
or under consideration, within that Statu (include grants tr '.Uto ay.'rwi'jj, !:.'
1 ocaT rt|e nc 1 es, p U?i:n ng a genets, others) " f,
I-
2. Po uat include FY 19SO program grants :K c.v.istnirtijn grt.ts. ;
3. Treat oach si:?pUT2ntal
-------
St -a:; c-i ___ Hisconsin __ ...... JAN 5 1330
:: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
Pesticides
Author iziii'j Seci:ic:i/Lav;: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of /"-.-d.-a: 9/27/79
(Actual or er.L
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project cr program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups. /
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.f>. \-i I fV 1 IC/U
State of Wisconsin
•
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
• BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . : '
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4C03(a)(lh K':sourv2 Conse-Cation .ic-d Recovery :-
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award: * r
f (Actual or anticipated) October 30, 1979 . .;-.
~ . » I
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) ^.^ . ;
i
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) .370,350
Brief description of project or pra
-------
\
• • 3iMii:> i.trir.i - l-K-vnj AS'J/OR PPAKT-APrLKATIES
State of Wisconsin
•
. DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
*^r
Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/law, section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of '••
1976 (RC.1A) h-
Date of Award: . f.
/ (Actual of anticipated) . October 30, 1979 * j.;
Total Project Cost: j
(Actual or proposed) 799-003 '
Federal Grant Amount: • j
(Actual or proposed) 447,'531 !
Brief description of project or program-covered: -n,is gran+ 1S awarded to sup- j.
port the eventual development of a fully authorized ii.izc>rdour .vaste nun a.]'? nc ;
program as defined by regulation: mandated by Section 3J06 of kCRA. in States 1
urable to obtain authorization by a specific time, tlie U. S. rnviror^antdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these frnds to operate the program ir that Stata. Seme
of the activities that are dsvelopnental in nature incite: resourcp. jsirfsspent;
legal and" regulatory development; permit and manifest system Javetopn&nt; e.xpan-
• sion of surveillance and enforcc-t.ient progr.?iTis; public particvifcn; ;
abandoned site and emergency response proyTvuis. • «».•
If*'
'"IHStRUCTIONS: ;
*
1. Complete forms, by Statcv for all project or ivosram c ;nts, a'.-iive j.
or under con's 1 deration^ within t.hot Stat'j (include grants tr '.t^tc ay.'rui'js, j."
Tor a t cigenci cs» pi an:n ng agenc-;ps, otherj) i
» • !•
2. Do jKi. include FY 19SO program grants or c.v.is true t ion gi-i.ts. ;
3. Treat each suppls-nental
-------
Si":tr- ci Wisconsin JAN 3 1930
niVJSIC;;: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authoriziii'j Section/Lav/: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of /"•-;=;••;!: 9/27/79
(Actual or crjticipsicd)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v/ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2!l5LI^i2S^G3i&^:^
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.. STATUS REPOPT - GRANTS AtSU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin—Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
ORANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040 •
(Actual or proposed)
•
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program^covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by Stato, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within thit State (include grants to State agencies,
~locaT~agenc~ies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do jaat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
/980
-------
State of Qhio ' " \
DlYISlG'l: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservative and Recovery Act "• •
-of 197C (RCRA) .
Date of Award: Pending indirect rate determination " ?:
(Actual or anticipated) f j
• i
Total Froject Cost: 577,000 i
(Actual or proposed) I
Federal Grant Amount: J
(Actual or proposed) 533,251 . ' I
Brief description of project or program-'covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste nunajenient
program, as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In Statas
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Unvironmontjl Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some of
the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment; le-
gal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; jxpansion
of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic-Jpatio1.; abandonaJ site and
emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS: ' '
1. Cr-mplcte forms, by State, for all project or pvogra.n ••: r-.tr., d
or_ ur.der consideration, within that State (include qv^nts tc '.ti.t= d
local agencies, plannilTg agencies, others)
' *
2. £•"> Jini include F^ 1930 program gnnts or. construct ion gr.. ,t^.
3. Treat each supplemental rcquc?st :
!
-------
. « \ ' . i * r> * f • r f I " i • «"
.' ' -»"^ "'V **r- • ' V'jj_ ' *-^_ -• • t ' ' ^-^L'lx" ' _ '^d.'1 Vf '^
State of Ohio _
%
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BKA'iCH: Waste Management Branch • •
Authorizing Section/Law: " Section /f008(n)(i); Resource Cons?.-vation jnd
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
" Pending indirect rate determination
Total Project Cost: ,.n nnn •
Utlua! or proposed) l,230,ooo j
t
Federal Grant Anount: 619,913 !
cr proposed) ' !
Brief description of projact or proyraitt'cqvore-J: This gran: is awa>deJ to sup- ;
port an inventory of land disposal facilities Used en Federo ' criteria, ard ''-
develop.Tsnt of State Solid V.'asto Management Plr-ns, ac. defined :n r-egu'at.'or.s man- .
ditod by Section 4002 of RCRA. Statos must meet certain pleuiiinq ••nqi.ir.'nient'; in '
the regulations in order to remaMi elioible for' funding. Tiv.> .<. p'lan.ivng re.qi'ire-
r.jents include: the formal idontif ication of reckons i hie soliJ ..as-ce nv.na jun.ent
agencies at o.ll levels of goverivnent; dcviiloonr.dt of le-jal an. regulator/ Authori-
ties over land disposal, hased upon the Federal critrriu; fen.. /a i "of r.erzain "legal
irnedii'ents ts resource recovery; and plarmin.j for adequate T. oil icy r.acicitv, if .
funding permits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by SUts, for all project or rro'j»-a': {• --nti, ac'/,v_'
or u.:t!er cor.sicieration, within that State (include c/'anti U* rc?.Le ^tOL^:'.
«>
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS J^, 0
u Jo80
State of Ohio
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: feticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)0) FIFRA, As amended.
Date of Award: Amended agreement under review by State Dept. of Agriculture
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $121,253
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Revised cooperative agreement has been sent to state on 9/4/79. Awaiting
acceptance by state before further processing of grant application; it is
expected that the state will be required to make substantial revisions.
Ohio will not take further action on grant until enforcement primacy issue
is resolved.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPp_RT_r__G_ff.'jT_S_A;::,1'.J)
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air & Hazardous Materials
BP, '-„;:'-'.: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Totil Project CusL: $178,431
'
Federal Grant A:TIOL'- $151,669
(Actual or propos-:-:
Brief description :~ ~'.;-ct o1" o^ograsn
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7, 8
& 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
-------
.. STATUS REPOPT - GRANTS AT!'J/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin—Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040 •
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do nat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
- l-ivvn a A.TJ/OR PyA
Stats of
A DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division '
I " * BRAMCl: Waste Management Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation *nd Recovery Act of '-"
1976 (RCRA) U
Date of Award: i
** (Actual or anticipated) ^|OV< 5 ? 1979 [".-•'
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3v:06 o^ kCRA. in States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. nivircnmantdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these fends to operate the program ir uhat. Stats. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource jssdsspent
legal and' regulatory development.; permit and manifest system Javelopmerit; expan
• sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public partic^'at-'on';
abandoned site and emergency response prcujT.v.is.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Couplets forms, by State., for all project or program c- ;nts,
or uinder con'sideration, within t.hot Stat'i (includt: grants tr M^te
"loV'a'i rtcjencics, planning vTgenc';o5, otheri)
•
2. Po HQ£. include FY 19SO program grants :>r coastnictijn gri.t:..
3. Treat Ovich suppltT.ental req'.^sc s?p.:i«'ar'.:ly.
*
Total Project Cost: \
(Actual or proposed) 799^003
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) 447 "531
Brief description cf project or program' covered: fins gran* is awarded to sup
port the eventual development of a fully authorized !iaz
-------
State of Misconsin
9
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division f
• BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Consent ion ar-d Recovery '••
Act of 197G (RCRA)
Date of Award: r
- (Actual or anticipated) Nov> 5 , 1979 ;r
ToUl Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) ^^ ^ . ;
Federal Grant ,%ount: \
(Autua]_or proposed) 370,350 ' '
Brief description of project or prcnranr covered: This grant is awarued to support;
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^raria, and Jevelcpr.^n';'
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulatv'tis mandataJ by l:-=c- \
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th^ regula-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These pianninj re^uireme.its include'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste nianageme.it agencies at a"il
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory aufjc^-'lies ov.jr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inipojinvents to .
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, ff fundi ig pei-inits.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by Stats, for all p'-ojyr; or pro;ran u- • ,ti, £•;,
or und^r consideration, within that State (include? cjra^ts to Late c-j
"local a'cJ£ncies, pTTrinuTg agencies, others)
2. Do BOA include FY 1930 pro'jr.irr, grants or.r_,ns.rt"itic-n y( ,c-;.
3. Treat each supplemental roquest separately.
-------
-t;;v: (.i _ Wisconsin
niYlSIO;;: Air & Hazardous Materials Division
pu-<••«"!•. Pesticides
u;.; uwi I.
Authorizing Section/Lav;: Section 23(A)(1) FIFRA, as amended
Date of Award: 9/27/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is to the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7,
8 & 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration', v.-ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
.. STATUS REPORT - GRAMTS AHU/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of Wisconsin—Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division . .
BRANCH: waste Management Branch'
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date'of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040 •
(Actual or proposed)
•
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program' covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or tinder consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do nat include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division • f
V {
BRAflCI: Waste Management Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of '•
f . J 1976 (RCRA) U
Date of Award: j.
l*£iH*Lof anticipated) December 15, 1979 . |-;
f t'
Total Project Cost: . {
(Actual or proposed) 799^03 >
Federal Grant Amount: |
(Actual or proposed) 447 "531 \
Brief description of project or program covered: This gran* is awarded to sup- j
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardou' ,var,te nuna. lenient
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3CC6 of kCR.-'\. in .States 1
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, t!ie u. S. rnviror.myntdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these ftmds to operate the program ir that. Stats. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature incite: resource assessment;
legal and" regulatory developnisnt; permit and manifest system Javelopmttnt; e,\pan-
• sion of surveillance and enforcouent programs; public parti cvat'cn';
abandoned site and emergency response proyTn.ns. • h,
IMStRUCTIONS:
1. Couplets fonns, by State* for all project or r.'-ogra.Ti c :nts, a'.V.-.va j
or under con-si deration, within that St-ati (inclutis grants tr '.utc ay.-rui'js, t
iTxra I si^encics, planning agenc-;?s, otharj) i
":
2. Po HQt include FY 1930 program grants or construction grt-ts. |
3. Treat each si:?pl£-r.2ntal req-.t>st sepacat'.:ly.
.
I*1 L f^
-------
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: -Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch . -
Authorizing Section/Law: • Section 4003(a)(l); Rosourc.2 Consecution ar-d Recovery "•
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Rate of" Award:
(Actual or anticipated) December 15, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) 1>261v750 ^ .
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual, or proposed) -370,350
Brief description of project or pronronr'covered: This grant ts awarued to support
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr^t^ria, attd development
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulations i:!andat2d by Sec-
tion 4CQ2 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th^ regjla-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These plannirj rpquirc-ma.its include*
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management acioncies at a"il :
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory"autlii.r"'lies ovjr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inip-sdiments to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi ig permits.-
INSTRUCTIONS: ; •
1. Coir.plete fortr.s, by SUta, for all ?^ojcsr; or rvc;ran $• '.-its,
gr_und«ir consideration^ within that State (inr.lude cjra^ts to tote
local ~ac|'inci as , pi arim ng agencies, others)
2. Do UPJL include FY 1930 proyrnm grants or.rjns-;n"ition «i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
t
--- ' IV A 1
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS "AND/OR GRAHT APPLICATIONS
State of ^Wisconsin '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: ' Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: • 7/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $39,629
(Actual or proposed) . •
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved state plan under section .4(a)(2)
of FIFRA, as amended. The state administered applicator training programs are
not funded out of the program costs enumerated above.
197;
-------
IV A 2
DIVISION:
BRANCH:
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GPsAHT .APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
Air and Hazardous Materials
Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended.
Date of Award: • ' 9/29/78 .
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $25,731 ' ;
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $18,000 .
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
To conduct a pesticide use survey of major state crops for the 1978 calendar
year. The above Federal grant award was made as a supplement to the Wisconsin
certification-grant, =£005242, and was extended to June 30, 1979. Final Survey
report due within 30 days.
I
1379
-------
IV A 3
]•-
t
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRA?IT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin '__
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous' Materials Division
BRANCH: Pesticide Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: FIFRA Sec."23(a)
Date of Award: 1/1/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431 " -
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative Pesticide Enforcement Grant. Grant will be made to the Wisconsin
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Plant Industry Division
to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 and 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state pesticide
enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and the monitoring of
industry and user groups.".
*•'<-*• ;97B
-------
IV A 4
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRAJIT APPLICATIONS
• State Of WisrnrisJn
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: April 12 197g
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $84 375
(Actual, or proposed) '
Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
(Actual or proposed) '
Brief description.of project or program covered:
$55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance.
INSTRUCTION'S:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all'project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies
TocaTltgenciesV planning agencies, others)
Z. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
IMI
WvL
-------
t
IV A 5
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT .APPLICATIONS
' State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28, 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Qua!ity Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State, (include grants to State agencies.
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
t
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
JUL
-------
|
IV A 6
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division • . .
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $7g ^
(Actual or proposed) '
Federal Grant Amount: $33,000 ' --
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description.of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, vrithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
i
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
;'UL
-------
. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 474
State Of Wisconsin - SEWRPC
DIVISION: water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: cwA 208
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 264.0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 136.0
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-covered:
Continuing Areawide Water Quality Planning and Management Program for
Southeastern Wisconsin
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active-
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 472
P
State Of Wisconsin - DCRPC
DIVISION: water
BRANCH: Water Quality Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: c^^ 2os
Date of Award: 1/9/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: 105.0
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: 31.0
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Dane County Water Quality Management Program (Section 208)
- Water Quality Plan Implementation and Service
- Continuing Planning, Plan Detailing Annual Review
- Water Resources Monitoring and Data Analysis
- Special Studies (Urban Watershed Investigation)
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 197
-------
ICATICNS
State of WISCONSIN - WISCONSIN SOLID WASTE RECYCLING AUTHORITY
ul VISION- AIR & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION
BRANCH: WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
•'\uthori -ing Section/Law: 4008 (a)(2)/RCRA
Date of reward: September 15, 1979
.Actual nr anticipated'
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual ;jr proposed)
Federal Oant Amount: $140,000
(Actual jr proposed)
Brief description, of project or program covered:
Phase ^1 project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis
for L^coln, Marathon, Portage and Wood Counties (Wausau - Stevens
Point area), having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
I . Co'!'.'j!ete fonns, by State, for all project or program grants, active
°ILJi.n. nc~i"el T^P1- "an rn n g agencies, othars)
2. Do v-ii. include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Tre,.-»t each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1979
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AMD/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS 0
State of Wisconsin
- - ™~ T~ —'"' ~"
»
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 4008(a)(l); Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979
_ . .
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $999,995
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $228,600
Brief description of project or program covered: This grant is awarded to supportf;-:^
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal criteria, and development!!:'^
of State Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulations mandated by Sec- [%•
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in the regula-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These planning requirements include:
the formal identification of responsible solid waste management agencies at all
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authorities over land -
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal impediments to {
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if funding permits.«•**
51
' '
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State ag.enries,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG 1979 ?*
-------
., --*••» i<- -*"-
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS *
• • i "• ' • . 11 . • •" •— .1.1,,...—— .... ..'...,.-.....,...,..— , ,.,.,, ,_——.—
State of Wisconsin
Li " ~ : *
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979
•• - • "
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $400,010
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $284,690
"
Brief description of project or program* covered: This grant is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardous waste management
program as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3006 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program in that State. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment;
legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system development; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation;
abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants tc c.tata agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
•
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
(SUV)
•X'iJ
1979
v-•'':•!••'•"•; !,'-:^'-:'lK.-!\. ' I •? i;V-'. :-:i--'i '- ::i;
-------
13
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act, as amended, Section 23(a)
Date of Award: 1/1/79 This date is pursuant to a deviation approval from HQ.
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $178,431
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $151,669
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
Cooperative Pesticide Enforcement Grant. Grant will be made to the Wisconsin
Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Plant Industry
Division to (1) enforce Sections 7, 8 and 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the
state pesticide enforcement program by increasing laboratory capability and
the monitoring of industry and user groups.
AUG 19?
-------
13
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: 'Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and'23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/29/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $39,629
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
State administration and maintenance of the pesticide applicator
certification program in accordance with the EPA approved
State Plan under section 4(a)(2) of FIFRA, as amended. The state-
administered applicator training programs are not funded out of the
program costs enumerated above.
AUG 1974
a
-------
14
STATUS. REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BRANCH: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4 and 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 9/29/78
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $25,731
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $18,000
(Actual or proposed) .
Brief description or project or program covered:
To conduct a pesticide use survey of major state crops. The above
Federal assistance award was made as a supplement to the Wisconsin
certification grant, #£005242, and has now been completed. Final
Financial Report and Survey publication to be submitted to EPA within
90 days.
AUG 137
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State Of W1
DIVISION:
Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: A n 12 197g
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed)
,375
Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
(Actual or proposed)
- ""
Brief description, of project or program covered:
$55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance. .
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do rtol include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
>
3, Treat each supplemental request separately. .
'Vs
AUG ' 1979'
-------
16
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin ' - » 1"
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch - . :
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28, 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100 .'- '
(Actual or proposed)
.-
Brief description. of project or program covered:
To assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and,
maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control, of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
Quality Standards.
r :
-j ' •
•J INSTRUCTIONS:
j '. 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
; local agencies, planning agencies, others)
s
2. Do no_t include FY I960 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
AUG -----197
-------
I
17
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award:_ January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
Total Project Cost: $78 72Q
•(Actual or proposed) ' - .
Federal Grant Amount: $33,000
(Actual or proposed)
> »
Brief description, of project or program covered:
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan.for prevention and control of air pollution and
implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
. INSTRUCTIONS: .'
• 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
•;] or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
| local agencies, planning agencies, others)
i x
\~ 2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
j »
j 3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
• STATUS REPORT - GRANTS ANP/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin—Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: September 15, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do no! include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials
BR,-:.I.H: Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act, as amended
Date of Award: 6/29/79
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $97,330
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amc^-: $39,629
(Actual or propose:.
Brief description o~ project or program covered:
Administration and maintenance of the Wisconsin pesticide applicator certification
program in accordance with the EPA approved State Plan under section 4 of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended.
-------
• STATUS REPORT^ GKAmS AN P./OK GRAilT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin, Racine
DIVISION: A-jr ancj Hazardous Materials Division
; BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
.i Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
' Date of Award:_ January, 17, 1979
(Actual or anticipated) .
I Total Project Cost: $?8 72Q
: -(Actual or proposed) • .
, Federal Grant Amount: $33,000
i . (Actual or proposed)
I
! Brief description.of project or program covered:
t
To assist local agency in carrying out its role in the approved State
Implementation Plan.for prevention and control of air pollution and
J implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air Quality Standards.
INSTRUCTIONS: / •
1. Complete forms, by State, for al'l project or program grants, active
or under consideration, v.'ithin that State- (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, pTanning agencies, others)
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
I
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
R'LKlRT - GRAMTS_/nD/OR_GPxAfiT APPLICATIONS
State of V.'is cons in '
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Air Programs Branch ;
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
Date of Award: December 28> 1978
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $2,525,321
] (Actual or proposed)
i • s C
} " Federal Grant Amount: $1,496,100
j . (Actual or proposed)
i
i Brief description.of project or program covered:
To_assist State in planning, developing, establishing, improving and
• maintaining adequate programs for the prevention and control of air
pollution and implementation of National Primary and Secondary Air
| Quality Standards.
i
.
I . INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration , v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
local agencies, planning agencies, others)
/'
2. Do not. include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
l
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
^
State of
t]
i DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
? »
I BRANCH: Air Programs Branch
i Authorizing Section/Law: Section 105 of the Clean Air Act
j
i Date of Award: Apr11 ,« 197g
j (Actual or anticipated) wpn "' 1J/y
j Total Project Cost: *84 375
; (Actual or proposed) '
' *
i Federal Grant Amount: $84,375
! . (Actual or proposed)
j Brief description. of project or program covered:
i
i $55,000 of previously awarded supplemental funds and $30,000 of new funds
i for public information projects on Inspection/Maintenance.
INSTRUCTIONS:
] 1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
' or under consideration, v.'ithin that State (include grants to State agencies,
] "local agencies, planning agencies, others)
i
~!
i "x 2. Do np_t include FY 1930 program grants or construction grants.
I
| 3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/OR GR.ANT APM.ICA7IGKS ^
State of Wisconsin ^
'""' ~l '"" L
-------
STATUS REPORT - GRANTS AND/ORGRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin
»
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
* BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 3011; Resource Conservation *nd Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
* (Actual_or anticipated) May 23, 1979
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or proposed) $400,010
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actual or proposed) $284,690
Brief description of project or program'covered: ijr;s ^ran+ is awarded ro sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized hazardou-" ,vaste management;
program as defined by regulations mandated by Section 3J06 o^ kCRA. m States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific tine, the ii. S. r'nvircrimtntal Pro-
tection Agency will use these funds to operate the program ir chat Stata. Some
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: re.^urce assessment;
legal and regulatory development; permit and manifest system J^velopment; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public particvat-'on;
abandoned site and emergency response programs.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1, Complete forms, by State, for all project or program c. .nts, a'J:~,ve
or under consideration, within that State (include grants if '".late a/?ru'.:$,
locat agencies, planning agencies, other*}
•
2. Do not include FY 1980 program grants or constrnrtion gr. .ts;.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------
*»
0
* E "0 Hi
X* ff) fi ^"*
- O
1 1 «0 3
3T
£ 3£ * V)
HI HI TJ i-i
»3 H) •*} TJ
X X • TJ
O CJ X
30 5o r> r»
i* i» * Q
z s: x o
Z Z Z PI
» cn
»» O5 X ~
i] pi -«J
•-1 •«!
PI O 1
38 50
PI TJ
*» 30
£ **) O
5» C cn
TO "Z. ^0
o o n
HI O
Z H.
Cl HI
PI
TJ
50
•"? 5» O
•3 C,
i n
i f^
30 HI
n PI cn
0 »-3
SCO
•O 50 Z
P 3
PI PI TJ
•^0 50
PI HI
O ""I 0
O 30
•0 30 HI
30 HI
:j 39 -<
C. W
PI < P
n w M
1-3 CO tn
HI H]
O
X
• Cn
**5 **3 3£
n -o x
iii
0 •«! £
P G HI
O Z «•»
PI f*1 C3
a 3 53
1 f
O TJ -S
C 30 Z
i-3 0
Ci •»!
•O PI 50
30 n o
O Hi :£
c,
PI TJ
n 33
o
30
H4
-3
Ht
H> T!
p
I A M
tn
y f i-i
•o •»
TJ TJ
P 50
HI a
o <
> PI
HJO
HI
Z 3C
PI
HI Z
Z D
1 -J.
V, f.
O .2
C 1-3
cn
P!
o
o
in
to
ui
z
O
•^
TJ
^
O
30
a
PI
a cn
PJ H
Cn r*l
0 3G
•O 13
i-l »-
O Z
z z
•• HI
2J
3P* Cl
^
pi rj
>» o
•R 2
M S
O M
PJ cn
Cn
E HI
*» O
Hi Z
P!
30
O
C
p
HI
HI
•< 0
4>
•a i
p u<
> o
25 I
Z -J
HI f>
Cl
Cl
TO
z
-J IO
ui in
Ul 40
« «•
UI »O
H> -J
IO UI
*O UI
-J *v
QO UI
» ^
O -J
H> O
ch o
•»J
•o
-sj
^
o
Jk
1*1
o
ci cn
o H:
in •»
to C
CT* *-?
Z O
0 M
*«•> *<
•o >»
a
SS M
o a:
30 —
a: o
PI 0
*• z
d V> cn
P) H; HJ
cn PI D
r> 3o c
50 2: n
TJ TJ M
^ t* o
HI *• Z
o z
z z o
»» Hi 50
2: *•
*» Cl Z
a 1-3
P! O
*• 0 O
E a: 30
M 5 HI
D >-i n
PI Cn HI
Cn z
E >-l f
> O P
tn Z P
i-3 t<
PI
•q
3C G
*» Z
2; c?
> PI
0 O
PI
z o ™
PI *. Z
as i o
HJ 0 PS
o» 33
TJ 1
3tJ *>J TJ
O «> •
0 P
3D »
3C -
0^
'"*)
•c
-J
kO
o
£h
0
Cft
a
P!
tn
o
39
•a
HI
HI
a
z
••
>
z
p
K
Cn
M
cn
O
"*1
p
X
PI
3E
HI
rj
T*
^
Cl
3»
z
TJ
X
»^
o
•w
p
z
X
o
*
10 O
Ui 1-9
^ X*
o
Ul
aa
Ul
»
•0
JO-
^
»
J*
«o
a>
•
0
o
in
CO
o
z
o
^*
33
Cn
^3
*•
PI
e
£
HI
^
PI
TJ
(-1
^
O
•r)
z
11
»<
O
30
X
O
to
1
o
in
I
w
to
to
u
%
•a
UI
0
IO
w
«
o
o
o
*»;
TJ
•*J
i£>
O
IO
o
UI
o
0
u>
w
1/3
z
0
t-^
30
cn
-1
>
P)
C
o z
PI HI
cn <
O PI
30 xJ
TJ HI
O
2 O
- O
Cl P
33 cn
P! Cl
H.
}*
P Hi
)y
X 05
•*i c
**!
•o -q
3D 53*
0 P
50 O
13*
3C
t/>
O
o>
1
H>
4h
1
•^
*X>
Ul
CO
^
J*
f»
cn
«t»
o
«
Z
"&. to
HI ^£>
Z OD
O *
in
o
*o
i-k
«j
sO
O
-J
C
•a
o
o
in
• £
o*
z
o
*-•
TJ
•s.
^
30
a:
PI
>•
• w w
PI H
r/i n
n 30
•0 2
TJ HI
HI P
O HI
"A Z
— O
t-<
» cn
al
PI TJ
f C-
r. f
HI ^
o z
PI HI
Zl
s: n
J3I
Cn O
H O
?1 T
3:
»^
30
PI
JBI
HI
Tj
Z
-9
3C
3»
^25
^
Cl
W
PJ
-s.
HI
TJ
£-«
*•
a
Z (It/
HI 0V
Z 4*
n-
vO
-J
'
-J
•O
o
CJ>
Kl
-J
O
0
Ul
5
o
J2;
O
t«
TJ
HI
P
P
3
O
1-1
O Cn
PI
tn PI
0 TJ
W J»
TJ
HI
o
z
••
)y
33
w
>3*
X!
HI
O
frj
•£
>»
Cn
r-j
r*i
HI
3D
rt
)^
HI
3C
TJ
"z
Hi
3
^»
z
ft
CT
PI
PI
Z
HI
TJ
P
3t»
Z
Z 0"
HI >4>
Z CC
0-
Jk
x>
I*/
•-»
-J
\o
o
•o
o
*c -
o
0
in
CO
in
7*
O
»-»
TJ
Ht
-^
P
2
o
HI
a cn
r*i
01 tl
rj z
-a <
•0 50
l-l Z
o s
2 PI
•• Z
H
Si >»
•f P
•-3
M TJ
O 30
••3 o
C H
M ^
tJ 0
PI I-J
HI
G O
30 Z
CO
£*
z
50
C
z
o
^J O
•q ^4
1
TJ H-
3O Ul
O 1
Cl •-*
30 t0
J»
s
cn
o
CO
^«
Ul
o
o
cyt
~4
kD
«
4x
O
^h
"*5
TJ
-4
vd
O
-J
t-»
Ul
O
0
-4
O
£*
^]
VO
HI
HI
t^«
TJ
•%»
a
P!
Cn
n
33
TJ
_
O
z
••
•£.
f»
H
PI
30
TJ
a
p
p
c
»3
HI
O
Z
n
o
z
-*
50
O *-*
p *•*
1
pi 1-
H; ui
> i
i-S ^J
PI CD
TJ
50
O
cv
50
jy
3S
C/I %**
G *
13 \O
TJ Ul
O *d
33 ••
•-3 to
O
O
4*
«
«O
*-•
Ul
«
J(*
0
o
•13
^J
aa
»-»
• *-•
»*
Ul
o
0
in
C*
Mb
Z
o
H»
TJ
Cl
50
PI
2
nl
30
O
pi n
CO Cl
O K
•» TJ
TJ
_, -q
O Cl
Z
•« TJ
P
50 Z
PI
*• a
S PI
HI <£
o
f1! O
O
3S Z
> z
cn
Hi
n
^
33
^1
*»
•-3
2
n
-j
3
£»
^i
]ty
Jl
03
PI
Z'
•-1
TJ
P
3P
"«^
Z H^
HI 9*
•?? CC"
Cl *
o
-J
in
^»
w
x>
o
^1
o
cr>
O C/i
O ^"<
l/l >-
to G
M* H
z o
o -o
H* •<
50 *•
c^
• 1 H>
O S
•S "
r1)
50
z
D
O 33
PI CO
in
O tn
3J >-3
TJ -J
**3 PI
1-4
O G
Z Z
•• HI
<;
>• PI
Z 33
CO
!fl HI
X HI
TJ ><
«
30
M
3?
PI
Z
••3
53"
P '
Cn
1-3
C
a
t<
o
0 -1
•n i
•-*
p o>
3* |
X -4
PI
p
p
CS
i-j
HI
O
Z
vj M
3D 00
*fc* \O
Z »
Cn 10
•C ^1
Cl ~J
50
HI
H
Z
H]
3:
w
p
)9»
5^
PJ
n
30
1-4
P)
CP "*1
J» TJ
Cn -J
i— l *&
Z O
cn -J
t-»
a*
P
t-
^
«r
o n
O 50
a ci
PI S
*•
•D
P
HI
n
k»
t*
i-a
3
PI
*"•> 3""
* £
HI >
»• -a
50 O
a
PI 0
-3 »
* HI
^ PI
a
O 50
30 f
z
TJ 1-3
PI
D *-
C S
71 3
tn c
~3 2.
*?\
C H3
"^ O
1-3
TJ 3"
3D P
0
C_ O
m o
n cn
n -j
-jf,
v/-<
\
\
V N
\
N
n
o >
o >~>
Pi H
»-<
>•• D
-:; ^;
CJ
tn
CO 33 5C
HI r^ G
e
W 30 O
•• -< f
•-J
HI 7! PJ
P O ••
P ~
H< O
2Z ^ I>
o r> i
HI C3 "O
Cn 1 CD
OI i
UI ~J
UI -0
•J
r
O *
*-4 »
I P
P!
!/> 50 J
iS :
*• -J t
Hi SC
C i» I
cn z <
5? o :
PI O 1
•O 2
O cn
3D Hi '
-} 33
C
n
H3
Ml
O
^-^
7
S^V
^V )
X C
g c
3 *
! (
T^
*
^*\ '
r
X"
V
^i •
•y"!
^x
.^v.
SEP
1979
-------
f
r>
•£. S- "O ri
' 3r» CO f"l M
- a
I I -O Z
z
£ £- in
M M *O ri
ri ri -n in
x a: « t>
t> a x
50 -o n n
*• *• • o
•£. f. X O
Z Z 2! :•!
• CO
*» 31 X~
"! P! •«!
-1 •*!
PI CD I
73 »
PI tJ
*• 73
s: •»! O
*» C to
V Z TJ
a o tn
w
•o
*
•fl >• O
a L,
I M
I O
V ri
n ™i in
O rt
•sco
•O 73 Z
t* 2
P! PI "O
ri O 73
W w
O -«3 O
O V
•O » M
a ri
o -a «c
c. PI
ra M M
ri to tn
M ri
o
z
(A
•q ij £
O II X
III
r> •«! E
t-1 =:M
o z ri
to a x
PI PI o
a 3 a
« *»
a «o s:
c w z
H O
C, •«)
o en
o -j
o »i
Z O
o •»
I- •<
M SC
2 -4
O *•
O •-• >-i
pi cn n
en
o PI e
TO ti z
»-« >> a
o
2!
c
z
a
50
0
c
z
c,
O
C
z
PI
30
tn
a
c
50
50
O
r>
a i o
z u z
•H u>
50 I -0
O ~l »
C" «D O
•
O Z
*-
o tn
o H
vo C
~J "I
z o
O T}
(0
tr- x
c1 —
. t-1 •
z en
o *•
M •«]
O 01 M
PJ
tn n a
o »o »
-o >• t-4
t-i z
•o x
«-j w
1-1 z
o o
z
— £
*•
O H
tr* PJ
> »
91
CA in
l-« TJ
•fl t«J
c
O
•W
C
to
o vt
o -)
tn >.
to >-J
»O C
a> *-l
sx o
~i 30
(D K
tn 53 5d
«^ PI c:
» -O z
>-l O
PI 5O O
«-. z r«l
r* o ~
•^ >» O 53 M o
c: a « z 2 oo
Mri PI 3: O d I
t- x M o >o
r* x > en i a>
M T) in i
z tn *O 01 -J
a -i c1 in j>
M J» M
o cn -4 n
M PJ >
tn m z
O T3 -O H
5d *» c
>-i to z:
•o r* i«
l-l O
o
Z S
PI
tn
'•<
tn
CO
r*
^
PJ
10
CD S
tr1
n tn
o . c:
•o
£ m
> 50
-J <
PI M
59 tn
•H o
O
E
03
^
U
o
z
en
73
O ri
M
•* O
so z
PI
tn -O
X 50
£ O
» Ct
»•• ri »•* PI
O PI O fi
O 50 O ri
x
P!
53
ta Z
50 ri c
O H 2
n T
O 50
CO
JO
cr-
ui
o
(A
O •
O
GO
in
U!
O
O
o
o
o
C- O O
v o »
X O >
n z
CA >-9
en
hi
(Ti
N)
o
ex
PI I 1O 3» 53
Z 10 O 50 O
*. ct o
CA I 53 PJ O
G -J t* -i *•
•O CD 2 * H
M «-• M
50 Cl
< 53
M J.
en z
o tn n PI o
z o 53 -o z
30 *» O tn
•O Z 50 «-S
•a -a ^ H 30
o tn • c
o w o *» n
\o c z *•
i3« MO t-i
» KJ tB C C
» 3% >-4 Z 2
O i-J
"^ O
O
a-
tl *»
50 t-
3
c. n
PI O
O en
•O
•O -O
f V
M O
O <:
*» PJ
no
{A
1-1
tn
Pi
O
PI
O
Cn
PI
r>
f)
w Z
Z D
i 2
s p;
o a
c M
en
PJ
O
Z.
o
z,
•O
-J
o n
PJ ri
M
> o
•- *• -Z-Z.
to ^> D
«. cn
O ri
> PI
ri TJ
crp
ot_r
1979
-------
n
x f. TJ «-j
»» a) o >-«
• o
I t "8 5S
Z
5C S- V>
X I - -V
O O X
30 50 n n
j» *• • o
s: s: x o
z z z PI
• en
s» at x •»
•«! PJ •>)
H •*!
M O I
30 •»
PI -o
*• *>
f "1 O
3» C en
50 z -O
o a tn
PI
•o
30
•«! »• O
a c«
• PI
I r»
50 H
r> PI tn
o H
o
o
tn
H,
O
P!
d Z
P! HI
tn v
r> »•
30 C*
O
o
Ul
z
o
r°
30
cn
O
z
O »
PI ft
tn X
n
V TJ
O
O
Ul
•z.
o
z
o
30
O
o
Ul
Ul
z
o
o
o
tn
o
z
o
o
Ul
z
o
,- VD f>
•O
X
o
X
£ »
PI Z
O tn O s»
PI H PI
O 3D O 33
30 Z 30 PI
•O 3D Z
t* 2:
PI PI -O
el O TO
PI I-*
a "] o
o 50
TJ » M
30 fj
•3 -a ~t
C. PI
PI < C*
O t-« fl
•4 to CO
ft H
a
X
en
t-t C* »-i l-l f
•O fl V V T3 fl TJ
fl CJ flZ f*C5 flO
Oft Ofl Of O C
Zi» Z Z Z *• Z Z
••z •• o *«z •• n
j» *• o *» > C1
5J fl 30 PI *33 39 39
PJ O P! < P1P1 PI O
S» O 1» PI X" O >• ""I
f.x s: c1 s: c
M ft 3 fi TJ ft o *» H *• >
Cn ft tn cn fl cn
fl Cn fl O HI o ••*
PI *-3 PI O PI "7E C1!
Z Z
H <-l Z H HI
5O 30 30 3D
n *o x
III
O «IJ «
f C 1-4
n
z
•o
f
9>
Z
Z
z-
n
K
3:
PI
Si
HI
X
a
PI
m
•o "u
e« P-
> v
z
•4
n
p>
3B
PI
•O
r1
>«
z
a
PI tn
cn -»
CS 50
30 m
fi *•
TJ 2
O O
z tr-
•• f
s; H
3" n
HI o
PI 3
50
O
•O O
o z
c- >-»
C" 30
c o
H: f
fi
Q 0)
Z O
O 50
O O
z
HI
39
a 3
i
•O M
39 10
O I
Ci -»
50 «O
59
Z
Z
o
*»
z
*•
13
n cn
o »
30 -i
fi rq
T3
HI CO
v-< O
o >•
to O
a>
I
f: Pi
O >
33 C*
X -1
X
•o
30
O
o
wax
pi PI 0
a a Tt
i *•
o t> s
C 3B Z
HI O
C- •*)
•o n 30
5CO O
O H -X
C.
m 10
n jo
•H (-1
O
30
to
^
o
o
o
to
o
o
to
o
I f> »-!•-» MM
i» «
u> o to
-J O Ul
woo
o>
o
o
o
m
o
Ul
o
z
o
z
o
o
PI ac
CO Rl
O >»
3J 3O
fl H
TJ r1
HI *•
j. ^^
o o
z
~ a
> o
30 30
PJ O
*• fl
s z
M *»
O -3
M ft
o
£ Z
c» n
HI
3D
PI
f
HI
z
-J
n
PI
PI
z
HI
•o
f
*»
z
z
o tn
O H
Ul *»
iO.HI
•i) H
z o
T> >
ft •-»
Z X
o —
*»
z
a
PI DC;
Cn P!
O f
TO -a
fl HI
•o f
HI >»
>-* z
o a
o
f O
PI O
J» ft
E: z
s»
cn n
fj O
71 X
30 Z
HI
39
n
••*
s
PI
z
HI
» '
z c
o -o a .
O 30 fi
O C\ t* !
•o
•o
sr1
n
z
PI
W ft f Z CD
f* Z Ul t-l U>
Z -
O -J
90
to
o
-J
Ul
o
09
00
to
f V
3D O
O
PI O
•-1 *» tn
* «-a H
O 30
3) *•
Z
39 HI
P)
O f
C Z
PI O
HI Z
O f]
"*I O
•O J>
30 t"
O
c« o
PJ O
O Cft
Hi fl
I I ft
cn
>»••-)
«o -o
•o -o
f *
M O
o •«:
*» M
t-3 O
ft
Z
t>
cn
p:
o
en
O
ex
10
o
-a
o
K)
K>
VO
O
VO
O
01
tsj
n
o >
o o
PI H
M
>• o
z z
c
t»
D fl
>» n
n «c
PJ
SEP
1379
-------
E S -D -J
*• eo o HI
• o
i i -a z
z
« S- tn
HI HI -O H
I I » -O
O O X
59 50 O rj
t* T* • O
s: s x o
Z Z Z PI
» Cn
» 0> X —
•«! PI -«1
^ •«!
PI O I
50 W
P> -O
)» 5O
3E •»! O
>» e en
50 Z >O
OOP!
HI O
•«! >» O
a c,
• w
i n
5B H]
n PI tn
o HJ
3: c:o
•O 50 Z
e-1 z
PI PI -O
H O 50
PI HI
O •»! O
O 50
•O 50 HI
50 Hi
O 59
Cj PI
PI <
O H HI
•^ Cn en
en
O T'XJX
•l1,1
O •«! E
f GHI
O sr HI
en o x
PI M o
o a «
• *»
Q If E
C 50 Z
•-i O
C, •»!
TJ M 50
50 O O
O >-J Z
O
PI T>
n 50
H] HI
o
50
HI
HI
K
H» "^
f
t I HI
Cn
f f> HI
•O -O
T> »O
t- 50
HI a
o <:
»» pi
o
o
ut
to
Ul
z
o
•o
en
c
a:
pi
>»
0 tn
PI M
tn
n is
50 HI
•o x
Hi HI
O JJ»
z z
o
£ 0
t* a
HI -z
PI r^
50 M
tr«
O
e o
pi
HJ Cl
HI O
K <
31
Z
*»
Cl
PI
S 0
Z 00
HI 1
1^
u o»
e- i
z
Ul
o>
0
u
4*1
w
•o
^
^
-J
»-•
o
0
Ul
Ul
4W
z
o
•o
en
c:
X
m
a z
PI HI
Cn 7)
0 *•
59 f
t» 3
HI HI
O X
55 H«
>* Z
59
PI T>
*» f
Z *•
^t 2
0 Z
tn HI
z
•E Cl
Cn O
M O
PI c:
z
50 Hi
k»
i.)
a
z
«-]
2
^
z
^
C1
%g
M
Z
HI
TJ
f
^i
Z
M H»
Z 0
Cl -4
tO
>o
on
0
o
Ul
Ul
flO
z
o
•d
Z
X
£
PI
O CO
Pi HI
en
n 3
•a HI
T) X
Hi HI
o f
•3 Z
50
> PI
TO fl
PI «
V -O
E f
M 3»
O Z
PI
0
S PI
tn <
•-3
n
H
50
7»
H
2
Hi
2
TM
Z
3»
Cl
PI
3:
PI
5S
HJ
•o
f
35»
Z
z .
Z 00
O CF»
(J
Ul
o
o
o
Ul
Ul
*J
z
o
•o
z
•o
a:
PJ
%*
O en
PI HI
tn
fl 2
50 HI
•o -x
O *>
Z Z
n
** S
PI Z
*• r> •
E HI
HI C1
O
yi o
"^
s:
> Cl
tn o
Hi <
PI -1
tn
50
PI
^i
H
2
^1
5E
H)
2
^»
Z
*»
Cl
PI
2 -
PJ
35
H)
•0
f
£»
7* I-
z to
H< to
Z u/
00
o
0
o
o
Ul
J..
H)
z
o
tJ
2:
5»
P!
en
O
O HI
PI J>
en
n -c
50 O
-o r1
H) C
O HI
z o
>» 0
PI Z
> -1
E 50
HI 0
D tr
PI
>*
E Cl
> PI
tn -2
HI O
1*3 *<
PJ
>«
(-4
2
^ O
z ex
>-i 1
K)
2 0
> 1
Z -J
S> ^
Ci
PI
2
PI
Z
H
•D
53
O
0
S* -J
2 Ui
O
O
o
to
w
1^
«
0
>•>
t^
o
o
Ul
On
w
z
• o
.50
2
O
,_,
cn
3»
O Z
PI •
en
0 C
59 Z
•o <
^4 •
0 0
Z "'I
53
PI
f
•-)
^l
O
IS
Cn
I
HI
•D
CD
PI
£••
1^
P!
Z
E 0
3t* ^
-J 1
P! O
50 Cft
1
O -J
C »
X
PI Ul
Ul
Fn *
50 ON
HI H*
PI ~
O
0
Ul
to
*J
z
o
•o
2
n
Hf
Cl
ff
o z
w
Cn a
o pi
3J -0
•u.
**
o -q
z
H) H
O •
r> TO
O PI
3 tn
50 0
O C
z n
*» PI
H en
PI
>
o
33
PI
HI o
Z 0>
PJ 1
to
a •-
PJ i
en -j
HI ^
C^
a:
)a*
H
PI
O
-
)»
50
PI
s: oo
HI tO
CJ *»
tJ M
f •-
^
5j
Z
«
H*
t*l "»
•KJ »-•»
"•1 *C
O %0
-D *
>-J >O
(n ui
^
. o
o
'Ul
U9
m
z
o
t)
2
o
Hi
51
%*
a z
PI
tn 73
n n
30 TJ
t)
HJ O
O
Z Z
^
tn c
3F* >y
-a f
PI
S B
HI "1.
a en
PI O
^
E 50
*• n
•H pi
PI en
50
0
e
x>
r>
HI
-9
K
2
Jw
Z
)»
, cs
PJ
2
PI
Z
*i
•o
P1
3»
z"
3;
HI H*
Z *O
Cl M"
-J
Ul
0
u>
Ul
Ul
^
4k
>o
H»
o
0
ut
ex
tO
z
o
Cn
2
O
Hf
Cl
3w
a z
PI
tn a
O PI
53 -O
•a
H O
0
^
f C
7^ ^
PI cr1
tn
•yj •
TO' ^
n en
en o
-) C
O 50
•o n
*• PI
•-! tn
HI
O-
z
Cl
50
2»
z
H]
t?"
59
O
Z"
Z >••
HI N)
2»-
to
to
Ul
0
o
Ul
Ul
K>
z
o
-
•o
"
PI
en
n'
•a
z
a
PI C.
tn t)
r> -o
•a PI
•o
•-S -O
o z
Z HI
e
> p1
50 »»
PI
> w
E P3
HI O
O HI.
PJ O
z
S >»
> p>
en
Hi O
PI PJ
•<
50
PI
£y
>-)
2
*^
Z
>-)
2
£•
Z
J>
Cl
3j
PI
Z
HJ
tj
P1
^*
Z
z **
H4 "
•z. •-
Cl a>
o
o •
o
0.
o
Ul
UI
•«*•
Z"'
0
-
•o
PI
en
-
0
PI
a z
PI Hi
en 50
n v
50 t*
•O 2
>-3 HI
o 3;
Z HI
f Z
50
PI -0
*• r1
E 3o»
HI -A
O _
PI ff*
S "3
> PI
en <
PI
50
PJ
f
Hi
3;
PJ 0
Z 00
Hi 1
IA
2 Ul
> 1
Z -J
3t» tO
Cl
PI
•3;
n
z
HJ
•0
P»
^i
2
Z H.
HI 3
U)
4»
O^
H»
gl^"
Ul
«
-J
U)
^
o
0
Ul
ut
VD
2
O
-
en
0
HJ
—
a
•ij
o
PJ to
tn V
O Cl
3) HI
TJ V
H] E
O
Z
O J
PI
2
Cl
^
Z "
H)
•*!
O
53
Cn
E
Ht
•a
C* 0
4*
0 1
O 0
Z •£*•
n i
PI -i
z \o
•j
3>*
HJ
0
50
~
f~
Aj
(X
-M
-O
o
0
H*
«
o
H»
ex
«
o
o
0
o en
0 «H
Ul »
o> c:
ct\ ^
z o
0 50
•a >
"C3
n ^
MM«
^C
3CT
I.
P1
PJ^C
tn -o
r> ti
50 PJ
*•< 5O
•a
H] "O
o z
Z HI
en
** a
50 tr1
PJ >
E tr
a.x« .
s o
*• PI
31 <
PI
_ .
•3d
PJ
Hi"
2
tj
Z
HI
2
^>
2
>
Cl
PI-
2
PI
2t:
*3
•
*TT~'
H«
y> -
Z7'
Z."
HI Ul
2r ao
.x>"
0
Cl
50
*•
•-J
«»
a TJ
D 53
O d
PI 2
*-
•O
P"
(•4
fi
*•
^)
^
2,
y>% ^1
* E
3» 50
5O O
0
PI O
^ >
* <-3
^ PJ
Cl
0 50
50 f
"•0 HJ~
t1^
O >
C 2
r*i o
en cr
HI Z
«^
0 M
•fl O
••j
*tj 3v
50 IT1
O
Ci O
n: o
o tn
*-3 HI
en 50 •
HI nq (
*» -D :
PI 50 1
-.•-i
<
2 Z !
O ~"
31
P^ tZ
ci n
z •
ut
Ul
•
C
3
P
tn i
HI
••a a
a j
m :
50 e
PJ C
o t
50 t
•(
t
•
\
Z
PI
P! OOOOOO.OOOOOCVO O S» O
00 OA ^1 W O> tO Cft O3 ^J -*O (X*cp |C^ ~1 ZZ
H>toooK>H»t>joc oeo»-ooo
cx^juiuio^H*uitOti>>^ui^tlo cn
• c HJ
*» ra
H3 "C
PJ
SEP
-------
> OCA OO-OOOOOOOCOOC05O
r» OH oo.ooooaooH»HFi
z: i: M H tn ** uiuiuiuitnuiuiuiwi>»k't»'o
>» DJ O M 10 -3 **4>.,t>.4»wj>j»«»j*HZHo
» o x>c .inioc:Mt«itn
I I tl Z U< H *-».UW.^*»tOU»H » H
z zo . z ar z s= z z z z zo «
S£»t/> -I3J OOOOOOOOOTO XZ
•
H H "«i r»i r»"or»~
3: X • TJ •«!>» > • • *O M "O 10 V *O T3 TB TJ *- O » 3:
tj a x c. eaoMi:
» » o o 3: H • srasiesECHHCB t« H PIS: o r»
>> >» • o Mte M n PI PI z » ro 'a ox •*- a
EEXO- O~ CnCnClitOHMl-lCc:— S^ZI
Z Z Z PI X H H H H «i H H T) UI
» co M to PI o o sc :t TJ ui
*»CBX— ci--j »s-Z3:ooasMtr' ui
•«)!«]•«) >•>» zwMw>'jeet«]*»i-«
vi-ij o = •-) o oncinaoa oasoaowocn r»
wot t»iw «cpiWPia:m3:w3:piHpiHn>-it«i>-j *•
30 TO Cnt? vi'tjcn^HCA^tc/iv-icoMC/i^oi^CA^iCft 2
Ft -o rjpiij rj-oooocjoooorj o owns: «-i
»«» »-oc 5Ot»i»>io»»'jjj»iox»-n-niiTJziJw
SE^O M<^tC I-150WZWZ1-12I-I wflMTOM MO Z
>cu> *n f t» T> T> TJ T> •OOTJOTJSTJX *•
• -n z -o ^ow «-j'ij >4tnHCn«-3ln<-j »9 >-j ^»MHII s
OPI -^-^n Mt»iM3;>--4 MTj*-«Tj>-«rjwo PI
M n o 02 ao oo oo o or- o t- a a: o *•
z~j ss-os: ZtHT;T033)2:t-i2 Xf-zvzft-t-zx
Ow — C > • ^z«pi— PI— O~ — Z ~ 2: — O ~
< n> -i w . r* c* 3 j» n
3 MM •ac'z-^-a-z.-o'
O . M>-ia>
•n>o wx»<
ac4 ?io> - -
in x: *» -j o *• ci a o o z >» t^oia o-oo
IO *•!:•« MZO M CZ>-3 MMPI PlfrtO
ton nns •floox-i-ia: o >^
rjwcn wa: s:*» msmr'Z'^ sas szs:
o«-J soto *»z><*-<«-iciio >» >» >» >c»
cs Dior'w*^ tnwtnotno
» -o <-* no n r> •< n PI »« 1-3 *t o H <:
tr"2 *<« piomopio o< m PJ PIXPJHI
PI PI -o w 30 p; » s i 3: x PI 3; .
•-iota >-i«i -••jzz'^jei'zz -» «^i >^ -J
MM MM tC»«»)Zrt5D5D5D»
o-«io £ w n-3Pi*» pipitntn
O33 M *»W>C13:>»»>->>
T97IM WO .H<>-JP1O^>-SHIH
»rt cz- spiszzzxxa:
oxi-: TJ— M >«ior4i-imnoiiino
C.P1 Pi *• *
-
o M M <«oo z .-N> » — »«> 50 a
HUD) M >-» Cl 3K O X M *»•»» >» i PJO
o. PISEPJM n se m n ' H
•o •» XPissz xwxse c:
» *» « o PI o PJZWPI co
o-z ss x -a z H ' z as
n 10 x o ti as "o "o e* *o "o o so "c
III*. ». *. > O >> Z >• »• Z5C
% Z -ZOO Z Z Z 3 SO H H
f) **J J£ 1C *J H ^4 *** Z PI ?0 IO Z ••* 1"^ Orf Z Z ** 1*1
^* d M 9* \0 S3 O^ fc*4 tfo ^C 1^4 X* £* 4^ t^ ("4 O Z O V^ ^) ^4 *J £} y
OZH to C* CTi O^ ZO O>3CU> UI ^ZtOO^-JZiOZ*-* C!^
CffOX — — *• * C1*O» •» » >Ci» ^O%C1— PIO
P1P1O *C *«J ^4 >O O^Q^^'O Cf* v-' QD UI 00 OO CnC
OOTIK1 3 O M Ou>O lO l<> J- HZ
j O -0 £.
\ C » Z
HO
C, "t Ci W
•O W ^J 30 Z
tDO C O H O H
H-400 O> O> tO > O *• O U5 vD OUIO
O » » » • H» » • - - H- C, O
50*-* O O •** P]OOO«OO4»OU>U' ^ Oi-^OCn
HU1 O O UI 4»O«^O M P!U"HH
K C . CO
•- •»! S
r1 *• c:
I I M . C« C«
Co M . l-l
>> *» H H Z
•O -O K C>
•O -0
C" 33 HI 30
MO O I»l
O •< X H
>» PI M PI
HO O> O Z
M M H '
•: o*> oo M
j Z 3! HO O
,1 t-t z a H
S z o , z *• to
. , • "E • . J= HO
i oz ** ** W** *" ** ** r ** :°'*1 C^
i
.
C/l ' QDU)' tOHtO«OHO *-4
PI *• *^ O'MOOOOO. OOCO»»O
«-- *• O\OOO 9< 0> 00 -J . O O O f OPltJ O
IO M U* l»> U* *UJ OA Wl O^ >— CO
• C. «
?» «
•-} -C
PI
SEP 1979
-------
*»
o
- o
I I T> 2
Z
z: s:- v>
IH i-i TJ -a
o en
o ^
01 »»
w -)
M C
Ul M
Z O
X X - -O
o a x
50 50 n n
t» *• • a
se z: x o
z z 2 n
- (a
» 3) X ->
*q n *•>
•-t •»!
PI O t
v -a
PI ti
*• -a
•£, •») O
*• C tn
30 Z TJ
OOP)
w r>
Z i-J
PJ
•o
TO
"I t* O
a c.
i PI
i n
50 H
n w to
o H
3C CO
"O 50 Z
C" 3
PI P) "O
H O tO
PI II
O -"I O
O 50
•O 50 M
» t-S
O -T) •<
C. PI
PI < C*
rj w M
M co ca
M H
o
• z
Ol
•»!•>» S
O -0 X
III
o •»! s:
e* e M
o z n
wax
PI. PJ o
o o n
i *>
o -o s
c: 50 z
M O
C, *«J
TJ PI »
* o a
a n t£
c,
O
•JO
to
o
z
-j
•«»•
X
' z
z z
W PI Cn
oi tn H
O O fc>
T> H O H H
PI *» PI »» PI
CO Ol
DO OO*O
53 PI tO ffl G
n T> M TJ CO
-•t) ft O -i IT1
MO t-H O O
o *n o "i
z -z -s.
~ X — X *»
PI PI i-3
en *» a: > pi
Hi X Z X Ol
PI ><
ca en
•O OH
C H PI
CD f I
O Ol
O •-!
tn *•
z o
O 53
•- K
01 *»
3T "J
M X
Z —
z •
P) f
o> a»
O X
P)
r>
S
>«
•<
01
tn
>•
Cn
a
na
PI
58
M Ol
Z M
X O
1-1 Z
Z >-
PI
II)
C 10 O
*- *• Cl
en rt i 3B
C m -J *•
•o 30 o> 3:
PI
50 -00
< -a -a
n t*
Ol l-l
o •« o
» o m
M r« z
•o tr" -^
H c •-«
•-< -5 •*!
O l-< M
zs o r»
~ Z f
~i
o n i-i
r" o o
>• z z
O> -1
01 5H >•
M a 3
•fl t* O
HI
r> >» o
>• « r1
H P)*"
W Z IB
o n oo
z •< «
•n
o M
•s o
•O HI
e K
CD a
r1 o z
ui
a i n
K »~ 50
o o
o • o
tn ui
o
z
o
z z
z z
PI PI
. Ol - Cn
o o
O -i O ~»
M >>• PI *•
Cn 01
0*0 O *D
50 O 5» O
o
in
z
o
O i-i
bl
TO
*•
*. c
•^ i-»
s: o
o -a
t- K
•D >•
*
•-) m c:
>» *o z
-» Q
PI 50 a
50
o
•o
o
or- _ .
PI W P1M
CA i-i Ol -i
o t* n f
I Z 50 3
n x
•-a —
50
O
•O
O
>-« o —
0-0 W ~
O 50 Z o
an t«i 3: aa
PI 3: tn rj i
o a s>
> «4 I CD
M > ui I
•O in ~J
t» Ul HJ
1C1 M f M
•xjf "Of *on TJO
•4C3 I-3C HO >-3O
Mi-i i-li-3 »HG *HtTI
OK DM oz otr
zo zo zrt zn
co o ae o >
HO >• o TJ -4
*> z HZ PI &
M 50 50 to £ Z
O OH H
EC" "O C* Ofl O
>» O PI l-« PI
H *• f *» H
PI
50 PI C PI
Z HZ
or» M n
> PI
Ol Ol
PI
3D
PI
> PJ
01 tn
50
"t
•O
c«
>»
Z
01
HI
o
"O
V
O Ul
M
a
»•]
o>
) •— CD
O>
b>
i»
«
Oi
w
o
o
«o
» o
x»
w o
01 O
o
50 Z
O — "SI O
f O ' Z 0-
I HI
•O*- >-
50 u. 3: *.
O I > I
O -J Z -4 Z
50 CD >>• to k»
f* C\ IT*
X
Z
^
be
o:
»-3<
X i
rs
PI
3
PI
Z
KJ
tfl
o
o
o
Ul
O
•o
*- ' O
^ o
*v 2>
c*
O
O
tn
o
ro
•O
e*
£>
O
O
O
tr
-j
CD
Ul
.*» TO
50 O
» n
n PI o
O 50 "O Z
50 > O Ul
Z 50 H
59 "i *S 50
PI C
O J» O
e z ' «-s
no M
tn C O
H -2. Z
O »*
•^ o
1-9
•O t*
50 C«
o
o
i-i >
C*
tin
Cn
f 50
M O
O •<
> PI
H O
«-t
O >•
Z ~3L
PI
<-t Z
Z O
i 3:
ff PI
o -z
c: «-3
01
P)
Cn
PI
to
o
m
•a
10
o
o
o>
o
en
10
O
0>
a o
PJ rt
»-f
*• o
z z
o
Ol
D «4
f PI
«tj
PI
SEP 1979"
o
-------
o
E E "O ~3
f a» r» M
» o
I « TJ A
Z
E E» »
l-c •-< t) HI
HI HI •*! PI
S X • t)
O O X
» 3) r> r»
j» >• • o
s: s: x o
z z 3 PI
- tn
t» W X —
•«I PJ •»!
HI "fl
PJ O I
•» -a
pi *D
x> •»
•K •*! Q
*• C Cn
» Z T)
O O TO
M O
Z HI
61 »-«
<
PI
•fl *• O
O C.
I M
• a
TO »a
r» pi cn
o n
SCO
•ono z
t* z
PI PI t»
HI o •»
PI »H
0-^3
o »
•O58 M
50 HI
a » •<
c, w
m < f
n M M
•i cn cn
»-i HI
O
Z
o>
.
O "O X
ill a>
.O •«! E w
f C n *•
O 2 rt W
U O X •
PI W O tf>
a o -» *•
i *• ~i
O TJ £
HI O
C, •"!
•o ?i a
woo
O HI S ^O
t, -
tn -a *•
O 50 01
H M w
o •
•X) N>
l-l \C
HI N>
tr1
I I ft
en-
s' > HI
•o -e
•o -o
C" »
M Q
o «c
> PJ
•-3 O
o
o
UI
CO
ca
Z
O
•O
o
X
5O
n
o M
PI O
u> s
50 C*
•o n
w C
0 Z
« o
~ p
3)
PI
£
O
W
iSTE TREATMl
z
-i
INAGEMENT PLANN
Z >*
o
o
o
o
UI
UI
^B
z
o
50
O
X
o
O 5»
PI H
cn PI
50 a
•O i-l
o
tn
z
50
1-4
PI
<
•1EARSHOPE
i
UI
en o
• 79 6
JRVEILLANCE PRO
•x o
3; *•
OD
UI
UI
UI
o
0
o
UI
UI
z
o
H*
"0
0
X
0
o z
P! Hi
cn c:
•33 x
•n
l-l Z
o a
2T i-l
PI TO
O O
PJ Z
*»
•e f
COUNCIL
ISTE TREATM)
•4 •
K>
a: o
•79
4NAGEMENT PftOGR
3: o»
ca
UI
0
UI
aa
o
o
•o
o
01
•]
PI
50
TJ
O
t- »»
C 1
•79 i,9<
in CONTROL PROG!
>» CD
500 4,646,474
< GRANT
o
o
Ul
-UI
z
0
•o
o
X
o
a <;
PI i-i
01 11
TO 2:
*O f9
O J>
z c*
•o
58 a
m HI
s: n
a M
M O
z
s:
HI PJ
PJ -S
TO
PJ
*•
Hi
'3C
Z OK
HI 1
*••
•79 1,2'
INAGMENT PRQGPAf
o
ut
o
00
o
o
o
UI
UI
z
o
•o
z
o
H
PJ i-J
Ol
a) X
•0 0
l-l *»
O 50
Z PJ
E
53 O
PJ PI
£ 0
0 0
pi -a
o
JATING
;STE TREATMl
z
Hi
Z IO
Z -J
0
o
•UI
o
z
o
•o
3
o *•
PJ tr-
cn r1
•a K
•0 3J
i-i
*» i
o
X 01
as -»
*> 10
71
Pi
^•j
PI
Z
*3
•O
50
O
UI
o
0
UI
in
UI
Z
o
•o
2
a:
<
o *>
pi f
oi f
58 ~Z
TJ V
l-l Cl
O M
T. O
E*i O
E X
0 M
(A
cn z
PJ
Hi
50
fl
H
Z
H
3E
kKAGMENT PLANNI*
n o
o
o
0
o
0
m
UI
00
z
o
90
PJ
O
PI
CB
0 PI
Pi -a
Cn n
TO rv
TJ t4
sa
50
3E
O
C
m
(
1 SAMPLING I
TO u>
0 1
ft.
• 79 (
'OR OH TRIBUTAR
PJ <0
UI
^1
-J
M
Oh
O
O
UI
UI
O
%
o
50
ac
M
o
PJ
o>
O PI
PJ 50
cn CJ
5OO
-0 f
M t*l
o o
z w
50
PI
r1
•n
PJ
o
"1
•z
PI
O>
O *k
n i
PI UI
M o
PJ *o
O
r1
*•
X
PI
50
E**»-
m
OK
W
O
0
UI
Uf
O
•O
PI
s»
HI
HI
tj t*J
PI
cn O
•a <
•O
fH
0 **
Z
7J TJ
PI O
O M
PI 0
z
£
Cn n
>-» r>
in »<
n
PI
v
HI
H) •
O
• 79 '
INAGEMENT PROGRJ
2 •*>
cr
O
u>
• n
o .
o
0
UI
OD
Z
o
»-*
•a
P!
H,
n
HI
a PI
PI
cn O
TJ J»
i-i a
o
Z -1
xi ca
W tf
Z 50
a v
PI H
* O
PI
Hi
TO
PJ
H
•x
-i
<
INAGEMENT PLANN3
z
on
f X
PI
>
o z
PI O
CA
TO l-l
-a ><
MO
Q "I
•z
PI
H; H
o
3C •«!
•-9 ro
w
•-j
O l-l
c: r-
a>
e«
i-i
Hi
Z Ul
Hi 1
50 **
o *.
-J
1C
o
K>
o
o
UI
o
•a
«k
O 50
CJ (71
PJ 2C
•O
TJ
tH
n
PI
f -a
50 O
o
HI »
*-* PJ
a
O 50
TO >•
50 H
P5
e s
CO C
-i Z
H
C >-3
50 C*
O
C_ 0
n o
• o cr.
•-j -j
0150 51
H P! c
*• -0 I
PI 50 t
0 Z *
a: o •
0 ~ <
o
O 1
UI
UI
1
STATUS REPORT
z s
Pi
l-l Z
|| . ^ (\ ^ _ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ _ ^ g;
i . _ -- . - - o in
c: w
01
PJ o io oooooooooooo>o
o
v pi
PI
u>
•J \
ao
0 -O
-J UI
»•» ' *~
o ', 1—
»j
vo
o
o
to
0
^ •!
•o
VO «O
0 0
OD •-»
0 »*
1*1 O^
— i
sD
0
0
t-i>
^
^—
0
iii
>o
o
-J
»*
-1
-1
•o
vO
0
UI
V*
4k
SEP
1975
-------
s: je "a t
*• CD o
O
o
in
,u
Z
o
o en
O H
in l»
*. -)
10 C
o -*
2 O
O 71
x x» -o
CT O X
» » n o
>» »» a
« E X O
Z Z Z PI
• GO
*" W X —
•*! PI T
H •"!
wot
•u a
PI TJ
f 30
SE "I O
*• C Cn
50 Z TJ
O O PI
MO
a **
CJM
PI
•t > o
o c.
i PI
i <"»
» H
o FJ tn
o «-s
2 C O
•W 50 Z
f z
P) P> "O
M O 50
H l-«
O •* O
O 50
•o -a w
» **
3 to -<
c, PI
M <: t-1
n M M
•3 o> at
t-t t-3
O
z
(A
O -O X
lit.
O •*! X
fen
O Z «"3
was
PJ wo
o o »
i >»
a -o s
c » s=
>^ o
Cr «9
•O !fl W
50 O O
O i-l 3
C.
M 'O
n »
t-
I I M
o o HI
X XX
»-l H4 ••
o o
en
PI O -»
Z PI >»
O •<; " ^3 TJ HI
PI 1-1 PI ••» PI
en 50 en
o o o o c
TO Z 30 ""I Z
11 z <-< cr
"O PI T3 "Z PI
HZ •-} *• 50
O > D C 50
Z r* Z 50 Q
T> t- 3
en 50 HI o
"10 O »
>• n PI as
H PI O Crt *»
PJ O O O H
•4 3 G PI
'•so c-1 o
o z PI Pi en
PI HI tn O
3O V PI C
o o -a
50 PI 1-9 O
O Z V PI
CO en
3K K •X TJ
O Ol 50
O
o en ci tn tn •j
O ^ 50 M P! C
Ul » J» J* 13 2
w -^ Z >-J O
-J C •-) P) 50 C
\0 ^t ~--J 1
Z O *» >
-J 50 3 -r r
tf> X X O •
r» -o «i —
"»! >> O 50 O C
c o « -s <
on wx o
x ae o i
M ~ *• I (
a -a ui
Cn "O cr •
P) fj C1 0> i
•Of M
o s> -j o
n M *•
M z
O
•O
TO G
l-l CO
•-3 11
M n
o
Z £
— *»
HI
•n PI
•< »
>»
Z
fl
>O
at
PJ
•o
CD
t*
CO
X
01
M
m
en
G
PI
so
to
O
C
50
O
PI
50
O
ra
o
o
IJ S£
-a • tn
*• t) o
l-l 0> M
Z I O
o o as
O -i 50
NO O
•-a n
SC 50
PI •*•
pi o
< 30
O M
en
£ M
*• O
n z «•» »•
T1| (-* ^ S!
» t- t) l-i >»
I 50 » 50 C
tfl K» O 53 O *r
•< Ml O C» 3
tn I » P! O P
•4 ~4 » -» »• t» 3
PI 0) Z * H »-i
3! «-• PI *» f-
« *3 a
en 50 e *
e *» to z
TJ z
P) HI 50 r
5O CO O PI C
< O 50 «a 5
M 30 *• O C
in z ?c >
CD
K>
tn
•o
«
to
O M -J
O J O
o
M
SB
50 \O
a u»
Z w
o *>
z
c,
o
O
O
M
O
Ul
in
to
00
O Ul
Z ~*
vo
•o-
50
O o
no
50
*»
P]
D
a o
tn C
O «-3
••> o
•-3
•o *•
50 f
o
d O
PI O
o en
H <-]
•o -o
•O.-O
f w
w o
o <:
o >
Z 2
M
M Z
Z O
I 2
Z TO
O Z
C rt
01
PI
~J
1O
o
OX
O
SE
z en
«-i PI
so n
O HI
t- M
O
"3 •*•
•v *.
o ^^
00 CO
o •—
en
w
o
o
z
' o
•n t-« D >
•o *. on
~J u» p; «-5
OO U4 r-l
t~ <-. y* o
•-* v z-z
U*-* C
<0 01
— " o **,
SEP i979
e
t>
-------
n
3C £ -C H
*» to f"j HI
• o
1 I T) 2!
Z
£ S« to
HI HI -0 >-}
H HI -3 PI
a: re « -o
o o x
30 50 O O
»• *» » O
£ £ X O
z z z PJ
• in
»» to x ••
•n PI "t
H "1
PI o i
n a
PJ ti
o cn
o HI
UI X>
Z O
-I TO
^ •<
£ >-J
HI X
Cn —
r»
en
o -i
pi *»
O •«> HI
PI «-J P>
(n
o o -C
>»fl-flG
z.'""ioi-inJ
i-etyi-ozc*
30 Z TJ >-J »• M
o o c»i HI H r»
M n o c
2 H a i3 «
cn M ~ *« >»
< r« HI
n en n
n -n -a
> PI
^ cn cn
PS a •<
•o
TO
•n *» a
D C,
I PI
i n
58 >-3
o PI tn
O HI
z c o
f z
PI p) TJ
n a -a
t*i HI
o -*j a
o 50
•o » M
3D HI
7> -o •<
c, pi
w < t*
n trx
,
Ill
I *»
o TJ s:
C 50 2
-1 O
C, -«l
•O PI 3O
500 a
O --J 3
Ci
ra t>
n 30
i-J M
-D 3) i-3
c f\ M
1C PI Z
f en
M W
r> e
*0
£ :o
»• 50
«-j <:
PI M
TJ co
M
w o
f< Z
I »
t» -J f
C «0 3d
TJ.
1-1 en
o
2!
o co
OHI
UI *»
u> «-»
O" c
O>M
K O
O 13
•- •<
£ HI
MX
tfl —
n
Of
z *•
tn x
O 1-4 t«J
t«iz
cn <-«
n o o
» Z W
HI a z
-on
o w
n H»
e> o
PI z
*•
z »•
tn r1
to >»
to
*n to
Pi HI
> •«!
w M
HI n
MO
HI 2
W
-j
C
O
K
o
o
z
o
cn
o
o
z
cn
o HI
PI z
Cn
O O
50 Z
HI 50
•O
•-3
O
Z
n
50
X
PI
Cn
•a
50
o
3D
*»
•a
z
o
o
z
o
•o
£
HI
CO
O
O
cn
O •-«
PJ Z
Cn
n o
50 PI
HI a
o -n
z '
— z
f HI
PI 50
*» »
£ tr-
Cy 39
p) m
Cn
s: o
> G
PS o
33 tn
cn
o
c
f
H«
»4
O
O
UI
Kt
z
o
tn
n
o
^2»
tfl
O HI
PI Z
Cn
r> a
•O HI
H
HI O
O **J
CO 30
f >
Z f
o
o
UI
K]
VD
Co
C
HI
CO
o
o
CO
a HI
PJ z
cn
r> to
•a a
HI J»
•o 50
•-3 O
o o
z -n
CO
HI •»•
•9
r* •
o
o
-
o
o
O
o
o
••
o
o
O
o
00
i w
VO
CD
O
O
UI
UI
in
o
z
a
PU
•o
o
PJ O
co -n
n
50 IS
HI i»
•a ^
o »
z C*
39
£ PI
M a
m s
30 50
"O E*l
a CA
c:
H4
O
O
Z
50 -
O O
f *•
I
Cn O
k) UI
*• I
50
O
n
H> , O "O *>
» 00 -D 00
f -J O K)
50 II f O
Z CO
O O
*«J C
•«1 33
O
tj m
30 CO
O
O
I
I
-4
IO
X £
PI V
cn 1-3
O TO
•3.
O
CO
CD
O
o
O
"
O
O
0
o
O
O
O
0
•o
50
O
C,
fl
CO •-
UI
O
o
UI
u>
vO
UI
o
o
o
10
o
o
o
o o o ocnn Cn 53
o o o OH33 Hirn
ui ui ui ui>»>» *. -c
ilk Jk «k 4kt-}Z MO
-J «O ^4 -*JCHI P15D
» OV >— IO -I «. M
Z Z Z E O •»
o o o o ~o s. z
»- •* H» >- *< HI O
O t> Co ~
•o «o -o tos» o » r»
C O Cl D 1C
en -n .-n D»^PJZZO
o o o *• I to o
c x x z — *• H. i
•-J PI TJ Z ui
X < «S "O U
pi *• *• rj t* i»
>• f f o HI
aco or1 of oc ri
PJHi P1P1 PJPJ PJZ S»
topi COK tn>< cnH 72
n 50 n o r> x n
50 a 50 S •» £ 50
IH HI>Hia>HI50 Z
53 £ *O HI *Q t^ "^ nfl Sa»
^-3Hl v^PJ HiPJ HIO* 3C
I-4COHI3)H|33HI W
O O O O O TJ
ZO Zi) ZO Zf
~Z -C ~C — *»
CO *» >» Z
4» HI *» C" J» f *•
3J2! 33M 3)H< 3Jrt
PI PJ *S PJ Hi PJ O
»59 >••< »••< *-S
£ PI S £ £ 3C
« S> H» II HI HO Hi
o o f o r1 o
PI "o cn J« tn t» m
t- z z
•S.V £ 3 £ £
J> Z f* HI J> *• >
co cn z cn n co
HI n HI a HI n n
mo p3 cn *< PJ
3
HI -X HI >4 -I
50 30 33 50
"i PI m M
*•*»*•*•
ae 2c ar z ~> >»
?t &
*4 ,.3 >-] H > -n
30 O
*» *>»•»» PJ O
s . 2: • ss z HI >• ai
> 9* 3w *» # H» HI
«-»tn j»
i-S
e
tn
93
e» «
O 50 -O
JO 3* ' O
50 HI HI
PI
O *•
c 3:
M O
tn c
HI 2!
HI
re
3
PJ
Z
O
PI
PJ
Pt
z
"C *O *O *O
f. t-r (-. f-i
»>»>*'
Z 2! Z Z
Z H» Z Z *• Z
HIN0 H41O Mitk Hl-sl
^ OD ZO ZUI ZCD
O
O
O
CD
'Jl
OH
o
o
•o
59
O
NO
K)
UI
K)
0>
O
O
O
O H
•n o
Hi
•O >
30 f
O
c,r>
m o
O to
HI HI
IT"
I I l-t
o>
•O TJ
t- x
t-« Q
c *•
Z iC
P5
n
>-»
o
z.
t-t
o
z
tr >
en
t"5
«o
O
>o
O
O
O
PJ
-0
SEP
jS79
-------
o
s: as t> H;
*• o> r> M
• o
i t .T) z
z
X E« CB
HI HI 11 H
HI HI -«1 PI
I I • "O
O O X
» » o n
*• V •* O
£ £ X O
a -A Z PI
« e/i
t» a> x ~
*q PI -I
PI D I
50 50
FJ "O
»» TO
:£•") O
J» C en
59 z -o
o a n
HI n
Z H
OM
n
•o
•a
o
c.
i PI
i n
•a H
n n en
o HI
3B G O
•0 50 Z
c* z
HI o
PI 11
s: a
H. O
O TJ C/> —
o ro o
an 02
n z z n
co o
*» HI I
T> 3 01
•O 01
P1 «
z
l-i
o •«) a
o 50
•o v M
9 H
o -a •<
t, w
O HI HI
H M cn
HI H]
o
Z
CO
n •
tii
O •«) S
f CHI
O Z HI
0> O -X
w n o
3 O 30
I »
a TJ s
C 50 2
-1 O
d •«!
•o « a
»o o
O H 2
c.
m "o
n w
•^ M
o
»
HI
01
K)
-J
ot
O X
fl O PI
HI 3» CO 53
" M *• HI
HI 2C
a *•
CO Z
93 O
O PI Q
O 93 ,T Z
33 > O (A
Z 90 HI
50 HI ^50
P3 C
Of n
« O HI
to C O
-i Z Z
HI
O HI
•^ O
HI •
•O t*
9C f
a
o r>
n o
O en
HI HI
•O -o
•O t>
f 50
HI O
n *:
>• PI
HI O
HI
Of
z 3;
PI
HI Z
z o
I 3T
SCP1
o z
C HI
cn
PI •
o
o >
o r»
PJ HJ
M
*» O
ca
HJ
SEP 1979
-------
K * -O H
>» O3 O M
« O
f I 1} Z
n
50
Z
H
tn 5
-i r
•-1 i-J *«1 P!
X X • "D
O CJ X
50 50 n n
*• *» • O
£ £ X O
Z 3 2; PI
• (A
*• n> x —
•*i PJ •*
i-i -"I
1*1 O I
TO 50
PI -O
•»• TO
s: •») o
*» s t/>
50 Z -O
O O M
M o
z ^
O M
•<
•W
•o
•o
•«i y o
O Ci
r> -o
O 50
o ct
M X
fc.
•o
•o
z
X>
3t
P!
o n
x =: o
•O 50 Z
C1 Z
rn pi TJ
1-5 O TO
P) «-«
O -fl O
O 50
•O 50 M
5D H
o -n •<
Ci Pi
n < f
o »-< w
l=J Ol CO
W 1^
o
z
Ol
"I -^ S
r> -c x
iii
,O ••] Z
r1 c M
D 2 «-J
Ol O X
W M O
O O »
I >
O TJ £
C 50 Z
H a
o -q
•o m •»
50 O O
a H 3
Ci
PJ "O
O 50
•-J M
o
K
t"
•o -
•O
« *•
* s
KJ
oe>
«
c/i
o
0>
X» 50
500
a
PI O
•* >»
* -H
" Pi
CI
O 50
50 >
. z
50 ^
p:
O f
C 3.
PI O
t/< c
-J Z
-3
TJ j,
5C C*
a
c. r>
w o
o tn
•-J -J
G
Cn
>» PI
HO
Z 36
^- o .
I 3E
a: P;
o ~z
C H
en
o >
o r>
P: n
M
>> o
z z
o
Cn
o »-:
5" W
M -C
P!
SEP 1979
-------
State of Wi scpnisj n
DIVISi:',': Air & Hazardous Materials
DD^' " .. Pesticides
Ai^do'-'zir,g Sec. iO'VL--,.': Section 23(a)(l) FIFRA, as amended
0:,-tv ^- •".;;-, rd: September 21, 1979
$178,431
Feceral Grant An,-.- : $151,669
(Actual or propos^
Brief cesc.-^ptK' : " . ret -.; " : ~
Cooperative pesticide enforcement grant - grant is the the Wisconsin Dept.
of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection to (1) enforce sections 7, 8
& 9 of FIFRA and (2) upgrade the state enforcement program by increasing
laboratory capability and the monitoring of industry and user groups.
-------
State of _W]'scmTs_i_n
[)]"•<-,; • •;-. Air & Hazardous Materials
3;,. ; Pesticides
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 23(a)(2), FIFRA, as amended
"' -.^"d: 6/29/79
• $97,330
$39,629
Provide funds to supplement costs of state pesticide applicator certification
program during FY 79.
-------
*
Stats of Wisconsin
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRAIIOI: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: section 3011; Resource Conservation *rid Recovery Act of
1976 (RCRA)
Date of Award:
*
eT lAcUiaJ_or anticipated; May 23, 1970
Total Project Cost:
(Actual or preposed) $400,0]0
Federal Grant Amount:
(Actuaj_or proposed) $234,690
Brief description of project or program'covered: This gran* is awarded to sup-
port the eventual development of a fully authorized ha2ardour ,va;;te management
program as defined by regulation mandated by Section 3J06 of RCRA. In States
unable to obtain authorization by a specific time, the (1. S. r'nvironmentdl Pro-
tection Agency will use these finds to operate the program ir that State. Some i
of the activities that are developmental in nature include: resource assessment;
legal and" regulatory development; permit and manifest system .'envelopment; expan-
sion of surveillance and enforcement programs; public participation; :•
abandoned site and emergency response proyTa.ns. • v
"INSTRUCTIONS: '
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program c, :Pts, active I
o rounder c o n side ration, within that St-.ntL' (include grants ic r.ijte cii-j'.'rci'js, p
TtjcaT"rigen"cies, planTrTng agsnci;os, otharj) . h
'• I*
2. To n.Qt include FY 19SO program grants or construction gr,.ts. |
3. Treat each si.'ppltTsntal req'.^S'C scpncatvly.
-------
State of 1','isccnji
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division !
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch • <
Authorizing Section/Law: Section 4008(a)(l); Resource Consecution -if'd Recovery '-.-
Act of 1976 (RCRA) :•
Oate of Award: ;•
(Actual or anticipated) May 23, 1979 ••.
Total Project Cost: ?
(Actual or proposed) $999,995 . :
Fedora? Grant Amount: f
(ActuaT_ or proposed) $228,600 • f
f
Brief description of project or pronrmr covered: This grant is awarded to supportf
an inventory of land disposal facilities based on Federal cr1'rtiria, and development1.
of Stale Solid Waste Management Plans, as defined in regulat-vns mandated by See- !
tion 4002 of RCRA. States must meet certain planning requirements in th-i regjla-
tions in order to remain eligible for funding. These piannirj requirements include,'
the formal identification of responsible solid waste riianageme.it agencies at all !
levels of government; development of legal and regulatory authorities ov.jr land
disposal, based upon the Federal criteria; removal of certain legal inipsJimerits to
resource recovery; and planning for adequate facility capacity, if fundi.ig permits.---
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all proj'or: or rro.'ran ,r i:it.s, z<.<:nc
or^ u n do r c o n s i de ra t i o n, within that Stats (include grafts to Mote £-j..;nr in.5,
"local ac^ncres, pTanrTfrTg agencies, others)
*•
2. Do not, include FY 1930 pro'jiMrr. grants or
3. Treat each supplemental r^cjuest separately
-------
.. STATUS REPORT - GRANTS At!D/OR GRANT APPLICATIONS
State of Wisconsin--Wisconsin Solid Waste Recycling Authority
DIVISION: Air and Hazardous Materials Division
BRANCH: Waste Management Branch
Authorizing Section/Law: 4008(a)(2)/Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Date of Award: August 20, 1979
(Actual or anticipated)
Total Project Cost: $223,040 •
(Actual or proposed)
Federal Grant Amount: $140,000
(Actual or proposed)
Brief description of project or program-'covered:
Phase I project to conduct a resource recovery feasibility analysis for
Lincoln, Marathon, Portage, and Wood Counties (Wausau-Stevens Point area),
having a combined daily waste generation of 1,000 tons.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete forms, by State, for all project or program grants, active
or under consideration, within that State (include grants to State agencies,
"local agencies, planning agencies, others)
2. Do HOJL include FY 1980 program grants or construction grants.
3. Treat each supplemental request separately.
-------