United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
500ECAOCING008
&EPA      Research and
              Development
             HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS DOCUMENT
             FOR SELECTED NITRILES
              Prepared for
             OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
             EMERGENCY RESPONSE
              Prepared by
              Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
              Office  of Health and  Environmental Assessment
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Cincinnati, OH  45268
                        DRAFT: DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE


                               NOTICE

          This document Is a preliminary draft. It has not been formally released
       by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency  and  should not at this stage be
       construed to represent Agency policy.  It1 Is being circulated for comments
       on Its technical accuracy and policy Implications.

-------
                                    DISCLAIMER




     This  report  1s an  external  draft  for  review purposes only  and does not

 constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention  of  trade names  or  commercial products

 does not constitute endorsement  or  recommendation for use.
U.S. Environmental Protection
Region 5. library (PL-12J)
           f"foulevard, 12th
           60604-3590
                                        11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents (HEEDs) are  prepared  for  the
Office of Solid Waste  and  Emergency Response  (OSWER).  This  document series
1s Intended to support listings under  the  Resource  Conservation  and Recovery
Act  (RCRA) as  well  as to  provide health-related limits and  goals  for  emer-
gency and  remedial  actions under  the Comprehensive  Environmental  Response,
Compensation   and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published  literature  and
Information obtained from  Agency  Program Office files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health,  aquatic  life  and environmental  effects of
hazardous waste constituents.   The  literature searched for  1n this document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included In  "Appendix: Literature  Searched."
Literature search material  1s  current up  to 8 months previous  to  the  final
draft date  listed  on  the  front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document 1s sent to the  Program Officer (OSWER).

    Several  quantitative  estimates are  presented  provided   sufficient  data
are available.  For systemic toxicants,  these  Include Reference  doses (RfDs)
for  chronic   and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both  the  Inhalation  and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc or  partial  lifetime  RfD, Is  an estimate of  an
exposure  level  that  would not  be expected  to  cause  adverse  effects  when
exposure occurs during a  limited time  Interval,  for example, one  that  does
not constitute a significant portion of  the  Hfespan.  This  type of exposure
estimate has  not  been extensively  used, or  rigorously  defined  as  previous
risk  assessment  efforts   have  focused  primarily  on   lifetime  exposure
scenarios.  Animal  data   used  for  subchronlc  estimates  generally  reflect
exposure durations  of 30-90  days.   The  general  methodology  for  estimating
subchronlc RfDs 1s  the same as  traditionally  employed for  chronic  estimates,
except that subchronlc data are utilized  when available.

    In  the case  of   suspected   carcinogens,  RfDs  are  not  estimated.    A
carcinogenic  potency  factor,  or q-j*  (U.S.  EPA,  1980),  Is provided Instead.
These potency  estimates are  derived for  both oral  and Inhalation  exposures
where possible.  In addition, unit  risk  estimates for air  and drinking water
are presented  based  on Inhalation  and  oral  data,  respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs) based  on both chronic toxldty  and carclno-
genldty are derived.  The RQ  1s  used to determine  the quantity of a hazar-
dous  substance  for  which notification  1s required  1n the  event  of  a  release
as specified  under  the CERCLA.  These  two  RQs  (chronic  toxldty  and carclno-
genlclty) represent two of  six  scores developed  (the remaining  four  reflect
1gn1tab1l1ty,   reactivity,  aquatic  toxldty,  and acute mammalian  toxldty).
Chemical-spedf 1c  RQs  reflect the lowest of  these six primary criteria.   The
methodology for chronic  toxldty and  cancer-based  RQs are  defined  1n  U.S.
EPA, 1984 and  1986,  respectively.
                                      111

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Nlcotlnonltrlle Is  a  solid; sucdnonltrlle  Is  a  colorless, waxy  solid;
and  methacrylonltrlle   Is  a 'clear,   colorless   liquid  at  room  temperature
(Hawley, 1981).   These  compounds are  expected  to undergo reactions  typical
of  nitrlles.   They  are  soluble  In  many  common  organic solvents  and  are
slightly soluble  In water  (Dean, 1985; Hawley,  1981;  Wlndholz, 1983).   The
1985 Directory of Chemical Producers  (SRI, 1985)  reports  that Nepera  Inc.  1n
Harrlman, NY, and Rellly Tar and Chemical Corp.  In  Indianapolis,  IN,  are  the
only current domestic manufacturers of n1cot1non1tr1le and that R.S.A.  Corp.
1n Ardsley, NY, Is the  only current domestic manufacturer of  sucdnonltrlle.
Nlcotlnonltrlle 1s  used  as  a  chemical  Intermediate  and succlnonltrlle  1s
used  In organic  synthesis  {Kuney,   1985;  Hawley,  1981;  Hlndholz,   1983).
Methacrylonltrlle  Is  used as a vinyl  nltMle monomer and  as a copolymer with
chemicals such as  styrene and  butadiene (Hawley,  1981).
    If  released  to the  atmosphere,   these  compounds  are expected  to  exist.
almost  entirely  In the  vapor  phase  (Elsenreich et al.,  1981).   The  half-
lives for  nlcotlnonltrlle, sucdnonltrlle and methacrylonltrlle vapor  react-
ing with photochemlcally  generated  hydroxyl  radicals  have been estimated  to
be  2 days,  1  hour  and  5 hours,  respectively  (U.S. EPA,  1987b).    Small
amounts   of  methacrylonltrlle  may  react  with  ozone  (estimated  half-life,
1 day)  (U.S.  EPA,  1987b).   Small amounts of  these compounds  may be  removed
from  the atmosphere  by wet  deposition.   If  released to  water,  nlcotlno-
nltrlle, sucdnonltrlle and methacrylonltrlle may be susceptible  to chemical
hydrolysis   (Lyman  et  al., 1982).   Volatilization of  methacrylonltrlle  from
water appears  to be  an  Important  removal  process (half-life  1n a  typical
river,  2 days)  although volatilization of nlcotlnonltrlle or sucdnonltrlle
                                      1v

-------
1s  not  expected  to  be  significant.   Adsorption to  sediments or  suspended
solids In water and bloaccumulatlon  In aquatic  organisms  are not  expected to
be  significant.   Results of  two blodegradatlon  screening  studies  Indicate
that  sucdnonltrlle 1s resistant  to  blodegradatlon  under  aerobic  conditions.
If  released  to soil,   the  selected  nltrlles are  expected to be  very  highly
mobile and readily  leach through most soil.  These compounds  may be suscep-
tible  to  hydrolysis  In  moist soil.   Evaporation of methacrylonltrlle  from
moist or dry soil  surfaces 1s expected to be significant.
    Monitoring  data   pertaining  to   human  exposure by  Inhalation  (succlno-
nltrlle and  methacrylonltrlle),  Ingestlon  or  dermal  contact  could not  be
located 1n the available literature  as dted  1n  Appendix  A.   N1cot1non1tr1le
has been Identified as a component of  tobacco  smoke (Schmeltz  et  al.,  1979),
which suggests  that a significant number of people would  be exposed to  this
compound by Inhalation.
    There 1s potential that  these selected  nltrlles could  be released  to the
environment 1n the effluent  or In fugitive  emissions from production and use
facilities.
    Pertinent  data  regarding toxldty  of  the  selected  nltrlles   to  aquatic
organisms   could  not  be  located 1n  the available  literature as cited  1n
Appendix A.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  rate  and   extent  of  absorption  of   the
nltrlles were  not located,  but  the  demonstrated  toxldty  of these chemicals
(Chapter 6)  Indicates that  methacrylonltrlle Is absorbed after  Inhalation
exposure 1n  dogs  and   rats,  and  after oral  exposure  In  rats  and mice,  and
that  sucdnonltrlle and  nlcotlnonltrlle  are absorbed following  oral  exposure
In  rats and  mice.  Methacrylonltrlle was UpophHlc and  distributed  rapidly
to  various  organs of   the  rat  (Haguenoer et  al.,  1976).   The metabolism  of
succlnonltrlle has been  studied _Ui vivo  and Ui  vitro 1n  experimental  animals

-------
(mice, rats  and rabbHs), and  the primary  metabolic  pathway appears to  be
liberation of  free  HCN from the  parent  compound (WIllhHe and Smith, 1981;
Contessa and Santl,  1973;  Floreanl  et al., 1980, 1981; Tanll  and  Hashimoto,
1985).  Liberation of free cyanide also appears  to  be  the  primary  pathway  of
methacrylonltrlle metabolism In  vivo  and in  vitro In experimental  animals
(Tanll and Hashimoto,  1984a,b,  1986;  Peter  and  Bolt,  1985; Pozzanl  et  al.,
1968; Haguenoer et al., 1976).  Succlnonltrlle administered  Intravenously  to
humans  (Lodl  et  al.,  1973)  or  1ntraper1toneally  or   Intravenously   to
experimental   animals  (Cavanna  and   Pocch1ar1,   1972;  Curry,  1974, 1975;
Contessa et  al.,  1978; Contessa  and  Santl, 1973)  Is  excreted 1n the urine
primarily  as  the  parent   compound  and  thlocyanate 1on.    Methacrylon1tr1le
administered   Intraperltoneally  to rats  was  excreted  1n  the urine  as   the
parent compound,  free  cyanide  and bound  cyanide 1n the form  of  thlocyanate
1on (Haguenoer et al.,  1976).
    One  study  was  located regarding  the  toxlclty  of  methacrylonltrlle  by
subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure   (Pozzanl  et  al.,   1968).   In  this  study,
exposure  of  rats  to concentrations  >52.6 ppm  (>144  mg/m3), but not  19.3
ppm  (53  mg/m3)  for  7  hours/day,  5  days/week for  91   days  resulted  1n
Increased  liver weight  and death.   Exposure  of  dogs  for 7  hours/day,  5
days/week for  90  days  resulted  In transiently elevated SGOT and SGPT levels
at  8.8  ppm  (24  mg/m3)  and loss  of  motor  control  of  hind limbs   and hlsto-
pathologlcal   brain  lesions   at  13.5  ppm  (37   mg/m3).    No  effects   were
observed 1n dogs at 3.2 ppm (9  mg/m3).
    The  acute  toxlclty of the  nltrlles  appears  to be  due  to   release  of
cyanide  during metabolism  of  the  parent  compound  (Marlgo and  Pappalardo,
1966; Haguenoer et al., 1976;  Pozzanl  et al., 1968).
                                      v1

-------
    Information  regarding  the carclnogenlcHy  of  succlnonHrlle,  nlcotlno-
nltrlle and methacrylonHMle, and the mutagenlclty of methacrylonUrlle and
succlnonltrUe were  not  located.  One  study  Indicated that  n1cot1non1tr1le
was not mutagenlc In S.  typhlmuMum (Florin et  al.,  1980).
    A  study  by  Doherty  et  al.  (1983)   Indicated  that  succlnonltrUe was
teratogenlc  1n  hamsters  treated  Intraperltoneally at  >4.56  mmol/kg.  No
Information  was  located  regarding the  teratogenldty of  either  nlcotlno-
nltrlle or methacrylonHMle.
    Based  on  the NOEL 1n  dogs  of 3.2  ppm (9  mg/m3), 7  hours/day, 5  days/
week for  90  days,  a subchronlc  Inhalation  RfD  of  0.02 mg/m3 or  0.4 mg/day,
a  chronic  Inhalation RfD of  0.002 mg/m3 or 0.04  mg/day,  a subchronlc oral
RfD  of 0.003  mg/kg/day   or  0.2 mg/day  and a  chronic  oral  RfD  of  0.0003
mg/kg/day  or  0.02 mg/day  were  derived  for methacrylonltrlle.    Uncertainty
factors of 100 (10 for Interspedes extrapolation and 10 to protect  the most
sensitive  Individuals)  for  the  subchronlc RfDs  and  1000  (an  additional
factor of  10  for the use of  a  subchronlc  s.tudy)  for  the  chronic RfDs were
used.  Because the  critical  study  was well-conducted,  medium confidence was
placed 1n  the  Inhalation  RfDs.   Low  confidence was placed 1n the oral  RfDs,
however,   because the  study   used  Inhalation  exposure.   An  RQ of  100 was
derived for  methacrylonltrlle  based  on  the dose-response  data for  loss  of
motor  control  and  brain  lesions In dogs  exposed by Inhalation  1n the  study
by Pozzanl et  al.  (1968).  Data  were  Insufficient  to derive risk assessment
values for succlnonltrUe  and  n1cot1non1tr1le.

-------
                             TABLE OF  CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.    STRUCTURE AND CAS REGISTRY NUMBER	    1
    1.2.    PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.    PRODUCTION DATA	    1
    1.4.    USE DATA	    4
    1.5.    SUMMARY	    4

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	    5

    2.1.    AIR	    5

           2.1.1.   Reaction with Hydroxyl  Radicals 	    5
           2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone 	    5
           2.1.3.   Photolysis	    6
           2.1.4.   Physical Removal	    6

    2.2.    WATER	    6

           2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	    6
           2.2.2.   Photolysis	    6
           2.2.3.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	    6
           2.2.4.   Bloaccumulatlon 	    7
           2.2.5.   Adsorption	    7
           2.2.6.   Volatilization	    7

    2.3.    SOIL	    7

           2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation	    7
           2.3.2.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	    8
           2.3.3.   Adsorption	    8
           2.3.4.   Volatilization	    8

    2.4.    SUMMARY	    8

3.  EXPOSURE	   10

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	   11

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	   12

    5.1.    ABSORPTION	   12
    5.2.    DISTRIBUTION	   12
    5.3.    METABOLISM	   13
    5.4.    EXCRETION	   15
    5.5.    SUMMARY	   16

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                        Page
 6.  EFFECTS	   17

     6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   17

            6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	   17
            6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	   18
            6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   18

     6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   19

            6.2.1.   Inhalation	   19
            6.2.2.   Oral	   19
            6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   19

     6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	   21
     6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	   21
     6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   22
     6.6.   SUMMARY	   22

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	   24

     7.1.   HUMAN	   24
     7.2.   AQUATIC	   24

 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   25

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   25
     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   25

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   25
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   26

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES 	   28

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   28
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	   31

10.  REFERENCES	   35

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   44
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR METHACRYLONITRILE	   47
                                      1x

-------
                               LIST OF  TABLES
No.                               Title                                Page
1-1     CAS Registry Number,  Synonyms  and Structure of  Selected
        NHrlles	     2
1-2     Relevant Physical  Properties of Selected NHrlles	     3
6-1     LOso or LCso Values for Methacrylonltrlle	    20
9-1     Inhalation Toxlclty Summary for Methacrylonltrlle  	    29
9-2     Inhalation Composite Scores for Methacrylonltrlle  	    30
9-3     Methacrylonltrlle:  Minimum Effective Dose (MED)  and
        Reportable Quantity (RQ)	    32
9-4     Succlnonltrlle:  Minimum Effective Dose (MEO)  and
        Reportable Quantity (RQ)	    33
9-5     Nlcotlnonltrlle: Minimum Effective Dose (MED) and
        Reportable Quantity (RQ)	    34

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

ADI                     Acceptable dally Intake
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
BUN                     Blood urea nitrogen
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient
Kow                     Octanol/water partition coefficient
                        Concentration lethal to 50% of recipients
                        Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                     Minimum effective dose
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
ppm                     Parts per million
RfD                     Reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV(j                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
SGOT                    Serum glutamlc oxaloactlc transamlnase
SGPT                    Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TOD                     Theoretical oxygen demand
TWA                     Time-weighted average
UV                      Ultraviolet
                                      x1

-------
                               1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS REGISTRY  NUMBER
    The  synonyms,   structure,   CAS  Registry  number,   empirical  formula  and
molecular  weight  of  nlcotlnonltrlle,  succlnonltrlle and  methacrylonltrlle
are provided In Table 1-1.
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    Nltrlles are  extremely versatile  reactants  and  can  be used  to  prepare
amines,  amides,  carboxyllc  acids and  esters,  aldehydes,  ketones,  Imlnes,
heterocycles  and   other  compounds   (Smiley,   1981).   Nlcotlnonltrlle,  suc-
clnonltrlle and methacrylonltrlle are expected  to  undergo  reactions  typical
of  nltrlles.   Nlcotlnonltrlle  Is a  solid;  succlnonltrlle  1s a  colorless,
waxy  solid;  and  methacrylonltrlle  Is  a  clear,  colorless liquid  at  room
temperature  (Hawley,  1981).   These  compounds  are   soluble  In  many  common
organic  solvents   (Dean,   1985;  Hawley,  1981;  Wlndholz,  1983).    Relevant
physical properties are listed In  Table 1-2.
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    The 1985 Directory  of  Chemical Producers  (SRI,  1985)  reports  that  Nepera
Inc. in Harrlman, NY, and  Rellly  Tar  and  Chemical  Corp.  1n  Indianapolis,  IN,
are  the only  current  domestic  manufacturers  of  nlcotlnonltrlle and  that
R.S.A.  Corp.  In Ardsley,  NY,  Is  the  only  current domestic manufacturer  of
succlnonltrlle.  The  1987  OPD  Chemical Buyers  Directory (CMR,  1986)  lists
three  suppliers  for nlcotlnonltrlle,  five  suppliers   for succlnonltrlle  and
four  suppliers  for methacrylonltrlle.   Nlcotlnonltrlle   can  be  prepared  by
the  ammoxldatlon  or  ammonodehydrogenatlon  of  an  alkylpyrldlne,   primarily
3-methylpyrldlne  or  2-methyl-5-ethylpyr1d1ne  (Offermanns   et  al.,   1984);
succlnonltrlle can  be prepared  from  ethylene  dlbromlde and  potassium  cyanide
In  alcohol  (Wlndholz,  1983); and methacrylonltrlle  can  be  prepared  by  the
ammoxldatlon of Isobutylene (Nemec and Kirch,  1981).

0033d                               -1 -                             09/08/87

-------




-


















,_
1

~*
CQ
h-







































1/1
91
^—
•»•«
(_
^
•o
+->
U
at
O)
CO
^_
o
3
u
3
L.
4-1
CO
•o
e

U1
>,
e
o
e
^^
CO

•
t
o>

"i
5
,^»
0>
ae

CO
«c














O»
u
3
U
CO


r- <->
3 £
<•) CT
at •-
•— 01
O 3

^ • c e u
a.-- — —
O "O "O C
c — •-•»-
rg l_ l_ •«-•
» >. >. o
u a. OP u
i i i «-


i
^f
"i
O
o


91

*^
^^
«^
C
o
e

o
u

51
i
CM
3;
1
CM
1
O
III
z

o
•
o
00



CM
^.
;^
,*






» at

• c at <^*
ai 13 -a c
i— £ «- ITJ
L. Ot rg W
-M O >» —
•- c u -o
c » at at
•a u e c
at •- at at
c -o i— r—
ro 1 >> >t
i-i CM £ £
3 •-!-•**
^3 ^^ ^ ^
CM
1
f^
1
O
r—



a>
^
L.
^^
^»
C
o
c
u
u
3




III
<_» e*5
1 Z
O 	 (_}
1
CM


O
•
^^
l^y




U-i
3jj
£


,
at
p~
t_ •
•— r—
C —

• a*-
at o **~
c ^ c
at o. o
a. i i—
O CM >»
L. 1 »-
a.^ o
O >» TJ
C J= ^

>« at at
w £ E
t i i
CM CM 0

1
co
1
vO
CM

at
[^
L-
<_
e
o
(^
^^
LB
U
2
<«ij
at























a<
^
• ^m
9> •<->
•o «-
— C
c o
U L.
u
Ot ro
c
Ot r—
Q. >>
0 S.
l_ 4->
L^ at
o S
i/> i
«- CM




















0033d
-2-
05/26/87

-------


















41
u
•o
41
1
I4»

.t
O






V
,^
£
1
£
e
u








^t


41
a.
0
a.




^f
u
^
2
at
.•oo
wn en
00 r—
en


A ^»
e ««
4) «••
0 41




eo
(^
cn
i









8
v/l












CM




U

^^


e

I

o»
e
^
I
•JO 00
co en

*~ .
• e
• 41
F- 4(
41 -0
C

U

' "O k
•O u


kf)
E
51
B
^^ •

O O
en «

_
•
un
CM
"•^
51
g
eo
r- 1
>0 •
CM 09



m
O
l/^
CM
^
i
m

CM (—
S 8
CM 0



I
« 1

^^
Of
•*•» u
e 3
— yt
Q i/i
0. 0)
u
f *
F- O
"o v
CO 9
vn
co
en
*™
O r~
4) 00
_i en
c—
•o
e •
ev
^B ^J
U
I/I •
c 
5 =





tfl
C3









CM
00
o
1












«
o













i

Cff
e
^> 10 1
CO 1^ ^ ^tf L* ^£
en* en u ua>« u*
^^ '"•o 5 i en i- o<
r" j/2 30- 5-5
<-*• iqec «•••«<«
10 41 O JJ >0 • X
o -«eo --eo F- ••
•«^vi men i/ienflB - ookn
e e en en •* en oo
j< 3 (O F-» »— • 4i F-on

«- k. 41 *>— ••— vi • I
•04I* »- CIO C.OC C»^
9<^OO u> (O fO C lOQDOO
^•i^en 10 4)-** 4»<^(a 4>enen
OC O r— ^ O 41 eS4lK OF-I—
u
1
•1
w g g »
§P» F-
o o
P» O O U
• * oo •
\fl < • CM
CM Z p- O r-

_
•
o
CM
^*
•1
>»
i" g 2
1 2 1
i/i » en CM
r* < • • CO
r- M i- O i—



U
CM
h/>
CM
ft
I/I


e o
* ui r> u
O • < • »
F- >— ar o oo

s



>• X
«* 41

F- el
— «^ w

3 41 Ol •»
F- > e
o ^ • —
VI «< >» O
u •» a.
V 2 ^ vi
5 1 £ J f


































IT
OD
9

3
«
^j
e

i
o
1
1
4>
5
o>
e

VI
3

•o
41

i
z
«
0033d
-3-
09/08/87

-------
1.4.   USE DATA
    NkotinonltMle Is used as an  Intermediate  In  the preparation of nlacln
and nladnamlde  (Kuney,  1985);  succlnonltrlle  Is  used  In organic synthesis
(Hawley, 1981); and methacrylonltrlle Is used as a vinyl  nltrlle monomer, as
a  copolymer  with  chemicals  such  as  styrene  and  butadiene,  and as  an  In-
termediate  In  the manufacture  of  elastomers,  coatings,  plastics,  acids,
amides, amines, esters and  nltrlles  (Hawley, 1981;  Wlndholz, 1983).
1.5.   SUMMARY
    N1cot1non1tr1le Is a  solid;  succlnonHrlle  Is a  colorless,  waxy solid;
and methacrylonltrlle Is  a  clear,  colorless   liquid  at  room  temperature
(Hawley,  1981).   These compounds  are expected  to  undergo reactions typical
of  nltrlles.   They  are  soluble  In  many  common  organic solvents  and  are
slightly  soluble  In  water  (Dean,  1985;  Hawley,  1981;  Wlndholz,  1983).    The
1985 Directory  of Chemical  Producers (SRI,  1985) reports  that Nepera Inc. In
Harrlman,  NY, and Rellly Tar and Chemical Corp.  In Indianapolis, IN, are  the
only current domestic manufacturers of nlcotlnonltrlle and that R.S.A.  Corp.
In Ardsley, NY,  1s the only current domestic manufacturer of  succlnonltrlle.
Nlcotlnonltrlle  Is  used  as  a chemical  Intermediate and succlnonltrlle Is
used 1n organic  synthesis (Kuney,  1985;  Hawley,  1981; Hlndholz, 1983).  Met-
hacrylonltrlle  1s  used as  a  vinyl  nltrlle  monomer and as  a  copolymer  with
chemicals  such  as styrene and  butadiene  (Hawley,  1981).
0033d                               -4-                             09/08/87

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT

    Very limited  data  pertaining  to the environmental fate and  transport  of
nlcotlnonltrlle,  sucdnonHrlle or  methacrylonltMle were  located  In  the
available  literature  as  cited  In  Appendix A.   When possible,  Information
concerning fate  and  transport of these  chemicals  was derived from  physical
property data or molecular structure.
2.1.   AIR
    Based  on  the vapor  pressures  listed  1n Table  1-1,  these compounds  are
expected  to  exist  almost  entirely 1n  the vapor  phase  1n  the  atmosphere
(E1senre1ch et al.,  1981).
2.1.1.   Reaction   with    Hydroxyl    Radicals.     The    half-lives    for
nlcotlnonltrlle,  succlnonltMle and  methacrylonltrUe  vapor  reacting with
photochemically  generated  hydroxyl  radicals  1n  the atmosphere  have been
estimated  to be  2 days,  1  hour and 5  hours, respectively, using  an ambient
hydroxyl   radical  concentration   of   S.OxlO5   molecules/cm3  and   reaction
rate   constants   of    S.OxlO'12,   2.4xlO~10   and   S.OxlO'11   cmVmole-
cule-sec   at   25°C   (U.S.  EPA,  1987b).   The  hydroxyl   radical-Initiated
photooxldatlon  of methacrylonltrlle  1n the  presence of  nitrogen  monoxide
resulted  1n  the  formation  of  formaldehyde and  acetyl  cyanide  as  primary
products (Hashimoto  et al.,  1984).
2.1.2.   Reaction with  Ozone.  Nlcotlnonltrlle  and  succlnonltrUe  are  not
susceptible  to  oxidation by  ozone  (U.S.   EPA,  1987b).   The  half-life  for
methacrylonltrlle vapor  reacting  with  ozone   1n  the  atmosphere  has been
estimated  to  be  -1   day,  using  an ambient  ozone concentration  of  dxlO11
molecules/cm3  and  an   estimated  reaction   rate   constant   of  1.3xlO~17
cm3/molecule-sec at  25°C (U.S. EPA,  1987b).


0033d                               -5-                              09/09/87

-------
2.1.3.   Photolysis.   N1cot1non1tMle  1n  methanol  absorbs  very  little  UV
light  of  wavelengths  In   the  environmentally  significant  range  >290  nm
(Sadtler,  1961).    Therefore,  direct  photolysis  of  this   compound  1n  the
atmosphere may not be significant.
2.1.4.   Physical  Removal.  Based  on  the water solubilities listed  1n  Table
1-2,  potentially  significant  amounts  of  these compounds  could be  removed
from the atmosphere by wet  deposition; however,  rapid  reaction  with  hydroxyl
radicals would limit the Importance of wet deposition as a removal  process.
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.   Because  organic  compounds  containing   the   nltrlle
group are potentially  susceptible  to  hydrolysis  1n water  under  environmental
conditions   (Lyman   et  al.,   1982),  nlcotlnonltrlle,   succ1non1tr1le  and
methacrylon1tr1le  may  be susceptible  to  hydrolysis;  however,  no quantitative
rate  data  for  these  reactions that  would permit  estimation   of  half-lives
were available 1n  the literature.
2.2.2.   Photolysis.   Nlcotlnonltrlle In  methanol  does  not   significantly
absorb  UV  light  1n  the  environmentally  significant range  (wavelengths >290
nm)  (Sadtler,  1961),  which Indicates  that  potential  for photolysis  of this
compound 1n water  may not be significant.
2.2.3.   M1crob1al  Degradation.    Based   on  TOD,   500  mg/j,  succlnonltrlle
Incubated  1n  activated   sludge   under   aerobic   conditions   for   24  hours
underwent 3.8X degradation (Nalaney and  Gerhold,  1969).  When  Incubated for
72   hours   1n  activated  sludge  samples  obtained   from   three   different
wastewater  treatment  facilities   1n  Tennessee,  an  Initial   concentration  of
500  mg/j, succ1non1tr1le was  found to be  resistant to  biological  oxidation
(Lutln,  1970), which  Indicates   that  these  compounds  may  be   resistant  to
blodegradatlon In natural waters.

0033d                               -6-                              09/09/87

-------
2.2.4.   B1oaccumulat1on.  Using the water  solubilities  listed 1n Table  1-2
and the following linear regression equation  (Lyman  et al.,  1982):  log BCF  =
2.791 - 0.564 log S,  BCF values of <2 have been estimated  for  the  selected
nltrHes.   Based on  these  BCF  values,  bloaccumulatlon of  these  compounds  1n
aquatic organisms Is not expected to be significant.
2.2.5.   Adsorption.   Based  on  estimated  K    values   of   7-16   (Section
2.3.3.), the  selected  nltMles  are not  expected to adsorb  significantly  to
suspended solids or  sediments 1n water.
2.2.6.   Volatilization.  Henry's Law  constant  for  nlcotlnonltrlle  has been
estimated  to  be  2xlO~9  atm-mVmol  at   25°C   using   an  estimated   vapor
pressure of  0.0016  mm Hg  (Neely  and  Blau, 1985) and  a  water solubility  of
109,000 mg/l  (Offermanns et al.,  1984).   Based  on  a method  of group  con-
tributions to  Intrinsic hydrophlllc  character   (Mine  and  Mookerjee,  1975),
Henry's Law  constant  for  succ1non1tr1le  has  been estimated  to  be  3.3xlO~»
atm-mVmol at  25°C.   Volatilization  of  nlcotlnonltrlle  and  sucdnonHrlle
from water can  be considered Insignificant based on these values of Henry's
Law constant  (Lyman et  al.,  1982).   Based on a  method of  bond contributions
to  Intrinsic  hydrophlllc character (H1ne  and  Mookerjee,  1975),  Henry's  Law
constant  for  methacrylonltrlle  has  been  estimated  to  be 1.5xlO~5 atm-m3/
mol at  25°C.  Based  on  this  value of Henry's Law constant and following  the
method of  Lyman  et  al.  (1982),  the  volatilization  half-life  from water  1  m
deep, flowing at a  speed of  1  m/sec,  with  a  wind speed  of 3  m/sec has been
estimated  to  be  2 days.
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation.    Since  nltrlles  are  potentially susceptible
to hydrolysis In water  under environmental  conditions  (Lyman  et al.,  1982),
they may also be susceptible  to  hydrolysis  In  moist  soils.


0033d                               -7-                             09/08/87

-------
2.3.2.   Mlcroblal   Degradation.    Nocardla   rhodochrous   strain   LL100-21
Isolated from soil was  found  to use sucdnonltrlle as  Us  sole  nitrogen  and
carbon  source  (DIGeronlmo  and  Antolne,  1976).  It 1s  difficult to  predict
the  blotlc  fate  of  these  nltrlles  1n natural  soils  from this  experiment.
Based  on the  conclusions   regarding   their  blodegradablHty   In  water  (see
Section  2.2.3.),  blodegradatlon of these  compounds  In  soils  may be a  slow
process.
2.3.3.   Adsorption.   Using the water  solubilities listed  1n  Table  1-2  and
the  following  linear regression equation  (Lyman et a!.,  1982):   log K    =
-0.55  log S  + 3.64,  soil  adsorption  coefficients  of  7,  7  and 16 have  been
estimated for  nlcotlnonltrlle,  sucdnonltrlle  and  methacrylonltrlle,  res-
pectively.   These  K    values   suggest  that these  compounds would be  highly
mobile and  would leach  readily through  most soil  (Swann  et  al.,  1983).
2.3.4.   Volatilization.   The  relatively  high   vapor   pressure  of  met-
hacrylon1tr1le (60 mm  Hg  at  21.5°C (Perry and  Green,  1984)) suggests  that
volatilization of  this  compound from  dry  soil  surfaces may be  significant.
Evaporation   from  moist  soil   surfaces  may also  be significant  since  this
compound  does  not  have  a  tendency   to  adsorb   to   soil   and  apparently
evaporates  rapidly from water  (see  Section 2.3.3. and 2.2.6.).
2.4.   SUMMARY
    If  released  to  the  atmosphere, these  compounds  are  expected  to  exist
almost  entirely  In  the  vapor  phase   (E1senre1ch  et  al.,   1981).    The
half-lives  for  nlcotlnonltrlle, sucdnonltrlle  and methacrylonltrlle  vapor
reacting  with   photochemically  generated   hydroxyl   radicals  have   been
estimated to  be 2 days, 1  hour and 5  hours,  respectively  (U.S.  EPA,  1987b).
Small   amounts   of  methacrylonltrlle  may   react  with   ozone   (estimated
half-life,  1  day) (U.S. EPA,   1987b).   Small  amounts  of these  compounds  may
0033d                               -8-                              09/10/87

-------
be  removed  from  the  atmosphere by  wet deposition.   If  released  to  water,
nicotlnonltrlle,  succlnonltrlle  and  methacrylonHrlle may be  susceptible  to
chemical    hydrolysis    (Lyman   et    al.,    1982).     Volatilization    of
methacrylonHrlle  from water  appears  to  be  an  Important  removal  process
(half-life  In   a  typical  river,   2   days)   although  volatilization   of
nicotlnonltrlle  or  succlnonltrlle   1s  not   expected  to   be  significant.
Adsorption  to sediments or  suspended solids  In water and bloaccumulatlon  In
aquatic  organisms  are not  expected  to  be   significant.   Results  of  two
blodegradatlon  screening  studies Indicate that  succlnonltrlle  1s  resistant
to  blodegradatlon  under   aerobic  conditions.   If  released  to  soil,  the
selected nltrlles are  expected to be  highly mobile  and  leach readily through
most soil.  These  compounds  may  be  susceptible to  hydrolysis  1n moist  soil.
Evaporation of methacrylonHrlle from moist or dry  soil surfaces 1s  expected
to be significant.
0033d                               -9-                               09/10/87

-------
                                 3.   EXPOSURE







    Monitoring  data  pertaining  to  human  exposure   by   inhalation   (suc-



cinonitrlle and methacrylonitrile),  ingest ion or dermal contact  could  not  be



located in the available literature as cited in  Appendix A.   Nicotmonitr ilo



has been  identified as  a  component  of tobacco  smoke (Schmcltz et al.  1979),



which suggests that a  significant  number  of people would be  exposed  to  this



compound by inhalation.



    The selected  nHriles  could potentially be  released  to  the  environment



in the effluent or  in  fugitive emissions  from production and  use  facilities.
0033d                                10-                             09/08/87

-------
                             4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY

     Pertinent  data regarding  toxlclty of  the selected  nltrlles  to aquatic
organisms  could  not   be  located  1n  the  available  literature  as  dted  In
Appendix A.
0033d                               -11-                             05/26/87

-------
                             5.  PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    MethacrylonltMle Is absorbed after  Inhalation exposure,  as  Indicated  by
the finding of cyanide liberated from methacrylonltrlle  1n  the  blood  of  dogs
exposed  by  Inhalation to  methocrylonltrlle (Pozzanl  et a!.,  1968)  and  by
symptoms   of   cyanide   poisoning   1n   rats   exposed   by   Inhalation   to
methacrylonltrlle (Peter and  Bolt,   1985)  (Chapter  6).   The  only data  that
Indicate  absorption  of  methacrylonltrlle  after  oral  exposure  In  rats  and
mice  Is  Information regarding  oral  LD5_  values  (Anonymous,  1986;  Hartung,
1982;  Pozzanl  et  al., 1968) (Section  6.1.3.).
    Pertinent   data   regarding   the   absorption  of   succlnonHrlle   and
n1cot1non1tr1le following an Inhalation exposure  could not be located  1n the
available literature  as  cited  1n Appendix A.   The  only data that  Indicate
absorption of  succlnonltrlle and nlcotlnonltrlle  following  oral  exposure are
LD5Q  studies   using  rats  and  mice  (Hartung,   1982;  NIOSH,  1987)   (Section
6.1.3.).
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    The  distribution  of methacrylonltrlle  In  the organs  of  rats  following
Intraperltoneal  Injection  has  been  studied by  Haguenoer  et al.  (1976).   At
high doses of  methacrylonltrlle  (1440,  600 and 300 mg/kg), rats  died  within
5-30 minutes  following  Injection.   Methacry1on1tr1le,  free hydrogen  cyanide
and relatively low levels  of bound hydrogen cyanide were found  In the heart,
lungs,  liver,  spleen,  kidneys,  stomach, Intestines,  skin, muscle,  brain and
testicles.  Haguenoer  et  al.   (1976)  concluded  that  methacrylonltrlle  was
UpophlUc and was  distributed rapidly  to  the various organs  before  death.
At  lower  doses of methacrylonltrlle (150  and  100 mg/kg), death  was  delayed
between  2 and  24 hours  following Injection.  Methacrylonltrlle was  found  to
be  distributed to the  same organs   as  when higher  doses were  administered,
0033d                               -12-                             09/09/87

-------
although tissue  concentrations  of methacrylonltrlle were  predictably  lower.
Tissue   concentrations   of   bound   HCN   were   higher    at    the   lower
methacrylonltrlle doses, which  Indicates  that  the rats had more  time  before
death to bind the liberated HGN 1n the form of  thlosulfate.
    Pertinent   data   regarding   the   distribution   of   sucdnonltrlle   or
nlcotlnonltrlle could not be located  In the  available  literature  as  cited  In
Appendix A.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    In  vitro studies  have demonstrated  that  rabbit,  rat and  mouse  liver
slices and mlcrosomes  are  capable of  liberating cyanide when Incubated  with
sucdnonltrlle (Wlllhlte and Smith, 1981; Contessa and  Santl, 1973;  Floreanl
et al., 1980,  1981;  Tanll  and  Hashimoto,  1985).  Liver slices or  mlcrosomes
taken  from  mice  or  rats  pretreated  with   CC1.  had  a markedly  diminished
capacity to  liberate cyanide from succlnonltrlle  (Tanll and Hashimoto,  1985;
WHlhUe and Smith,  1981;  Contessa and Santl,  1973; Contessa et  al.,  1978).
In  contrast  to CC1.  pretreatment,  liver  slices  taken  from rats  pretreated
with ethanol  showed a markedly elevated capacity  for  liberating cyanide  from
sucdnonltrlle (Contessa et al.,  1978).
    Cyanide  was  found  In the brain,  liver  and other organs of experimental
animals (mice  and  rabbits) Injected  Intravenously  or  Intraperltoneally,  or
dosed  orally with  succlnonltrlle (Wlllhlte and Smith, 1981;  Contessa and
Santl,  1973;  Tanll   and  Hashimoto,  1985).   In  agreement  with ^n   vitro
studies, pretreatment  of  these  animals  with  CC1.  Inhibited  the  liberation
of cyanide in vivo.
    A series  of  U>  vitro experiments  by  Tan11  and Hashimoto  (1984a,b,  1986)
demonstrated  that mouse  hepatic mlcrosomes are capable  of  liberating cyanide
from  methacrylonltrlle.   As  with   sucdnonltrlle,  mlcrosomes   from   mice
pretreated with  CC1   were  unable to liberate cyanide from methacrylonltrlle

0033d                               -13-                              09/09/87

-------
(Tanll and  Hashimoto,  1984a,b)  and mlcrosomes prepared  from  mice  pretreated
with   ethanol    had   an   enhanced   ability   to   liberate   cyanide   from
methacrylonltMle (Tan11 and Hashimoto,  1986).
    Rats  exposed  by   Inhalation   to  doses  between  3180  and   5700   ppm
(8726-15,641 mg/m3)  methacrylonltrlle demonstrated signs  that  were  similar
to  cyanide  poisoning,  Indicating  that  cyanide had been  liberated from  the
parent compound  (Peter  and  Bolt,  1985).   Further evidence Indicating  the  in
vivo  liberation  of  cyanide from methacrylonltrlle  was the effectiveness  of
cyanide  antidotes  1n the  treatment  of  acute methacrylonltrlle toxlclty  In
rats and rabbits (Pozzanl  et a!.,  1968).
    Haguenoer et al. (1976) found  dose-related  differences 1n the  metabolism
of  methacrylonltrlle  In  rats.   Rats  were  Injected   1ntraper1toneally  with
methacrylon1tr1le at doses  of  1440,  600,  300, 150 or 100 mg/kg.  Death  at
each of  the dose levels was from cyanide liberated  from the  parent compound,
but the  time until death  Increased with decreasing  methacrylonltrlle  dose.
Cyanide  was  found to  be liberated  very rapidly  from methacrylonltrlle  in
vVvo,   and  at   the  three  higher   doses   (1440,  600  and 300  mg/kg),  death
occurred ~5, 15 and  30 minutes, respectively,  following Injection.   At  the
lower   doses,  death was  delayed until  -2-24 hours  following  Injection  and
more  bound  HCN  In the  form of  thlocyanate  was found  1n  the organs  of  the
rats.    Haguenoer et  al.  (1976) hypothesized  that  at  the  lower  doses,  the
rats had more  time  to  detoxify the cyanide  liberated  from methacrylonltrlle
by binding the cyanide  In the form of thlocyanate.
    Pertinent data regarding  the  metabolism of n1cot1non1tr1le could  not  be
located  1n the available literature as cited 1n Appendix A.
0033d                               -14-                             09/09/87

-------
5.4.   EXCRETION
    SucdnonltMle  Injected  Intravenously Into  dogs  at  doses  of  3  and  10
mg/kg had a half-life 1n the blood of  21  and  19  hours,  respectively (Lodl  et
al., 1973).  The half-life of sucdnonltMle  In  the blood  of  humans Injected
with 250 mg Intravenously was -24 hours.   In  humans,  95%  of an  Intravenously
administered dose of sucdnonltrlle was eliminated as thlocyanate 1on  1n  the
urine, while 2-3% was eliminated unchanged 1n  the urine  (Lod1  et al.,  1973).
    Several Investigators  (Cavanna  and Pocchlarl,  1972;  Curry, 1974,  1975;
Contessa et al.,  1978;  Contessa and  Santl, 1973) reported that experimental
animals (mice, rats  and rabbits)  Injected  1ntraper1toneally or  Intravenously
with  sucdnonltrlle excreted   the  unmetabollzed parent  compound  or  thlo-
cyanate In  the urine.   CC1.  pretreatment was found  to Inhibit the  urinary
excretion of thlocyanate 1n  the rat  (Contessa et al.,  1978).  Also,  urinary
excretion of  cyanoacetlc  add  was observed  In  mice  Injected with sucdno-
nltrlle (Merkow et al.,  1959).
    Methacrylonltrlle and  free and bound HCN were eliminated  1n the urine  of
rats  Injected  IntraperHoneally  with  methacrylonltrlle  (Haguenoer et al.,
1976).  Methacrylonltrlle  was  eliminated  In  very  small   quantities  1n  the
urine, and 4-5 days  following Injection was not  detected  1n the urine.  Free
HCN was not present  1n the urine  1n significant  amounts after the first day.
The levels of  combined  HCN  1n the urine were high the first 2 days and then
declined rapidly  to normal.   Of the  Injected dose,  10-16X  of methacrylo-
nltrlle was eliminated  1n  the form of  free and  combined  HCN In the urine.
    Pertinent  data  regarding the excretion of n1cot1non1tr1le  could  not  be
located 1n  the available literature as  cited  In Appendix A.
0033d                               -15-                             05/26/87

-------
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  rate  and  extent  of  absorption  of  the
nltrlles were  not  located,  but  the demonstrated tox1c1ty of  these  chemicals
(Chapter 6)  Indicates  that  methacrylonltrlle  Is  absorbed  after  Inhalation
exposure In dogs and  rats and after  oral  exposure  1n  rats and mice,  and that
succlnonltrlle and  nlcotlnonltrlle are absorbed  following  oral exposure  In
rats and mice.   Methacrylonltrlle  was llpophlllc and distributed rapidly  to
various  organs of  the  rat  (Haguenoer  et  a!.,  1976).  The metabolism  of
succ1non1tr1le has  been  studied  In  vivo and  In  vitro  using  experimental
animals (mice, rats  and rabbits),  and the primary  metabolic  pathway  appears
to  be  liberation  of  free HCN  from the parent compound (W1llh1te and Smith,
1981;  Contessa and  Santl,   1973;  Floreanl  et al.,  1980,  1981;  Tanll  and
Hashimoto,  1985).  Liberation of free cyanide also  appears  to be the  primary
pathway of methacrylonltrlle metabolism Iji vivo and in  vitro  1n experimental
animals (Tanll and  Hashimoto,  1984a,b, 1986;  Peter and Bolt,  1985;  Pozzanl
et  al.,   1968;   Haguenoer   et  al.,  1976).    Succlnonltrlle  administered
Intravenously  to  humans  (Lod1   et  al.,   1973)   or   1ntraper1toneally  or
Intravenously  to  experimental  animals (Cavanna  and Pocch1ar1,  1972;  Curry,
1974, 1975; Contessa  et al.,  1978; Contessa and Santl, 1973)  Is excreted  1n
the   urine  primarily   as   the   parent   compound   and    thlocyanate   Ion.
Methacrylon1tr1le  administered  1ntraper1toneally  to  rats  was  found to  be
excreted 1n the urine as  the parent  compound,  free  cyanide  and bound  cyanide
In  the form of thlocyanate Ion (Haguenoer  et al., 1976).
0033d                               -16-                             09/09/87

-------
                                  6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Only  one  study  was   found   on   the   systemic
toxldty of  methacrylonltrlle  following  subchronlc Inhalation  exposures  In
beagle  dogs  and  Harlan-VMstar  rats  (Pozzanl  et al.,  1968).   Groups  of  12
male and 12  female rats were exposed  to  0,  19.3,  52.6 or  109.3  ppm (0,  53,
144  or  300  mg/m3), 7  hours/day,  5  days/week  for 91  days.    Endpolnts  of
toxlclty examined  were overt  signs,  body weight  changes,  liver and  kidney
weights and gross  and  hlstologlcal  examination of  19 tissues.   The  brain was
not  examined  microscopically.   The  only  treatment-related   effects  were
deaths  during  the  first or second  day  of one 52.6 ppm male and  seven 109.3
ppm males,  and significantly Increased relative  liver weights  1n  males  and
females at 109.3 ppm and In males at 52.6  ppm.
    Groups of  three male dogs  were  exposed  to methacrylonltrlle at concen-
trations of 0,  3.2, 8.8 or 13.5  ppm  (0,  9,  24 or  37  mg/m3),  7 hours/day,  5
days/week for  90  days.  Endpolnts  examined were  body weight  changes,  overt
signs,  hematocrlt, total  and  differential  white  cell  counts,  BUN,  SGOT,
SGPT, SAP,  liver  and kidney  weights  and  gross and  hlstologlcal  examination
of 27 tissues,  Including the  brain.   At 13.5  ppm,  CNS  toxlclty, as  evidenced
by convulsions  and loss of motor  control of  the hindquarters,  was observed
In 2/3 dogs.  One  of these  dogs  had hlstopathologlcal  brain lesions, Includ-
ing  some  demy ell nation of  the  corpus callosum.   SGOT and SGPT  levels  were
markedly elevated  1n 1/3 dogs at  8.8  ppm, but the  elevations were transient.
No other treatment-related effects were observed.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  subchronlc Inhalation  exposure  to   succlno-
nltrlle or n1cot1non1tr1le  could  not  be  located 1n  the available  literature
as dted In Appendix A.

0033d                               -17-                             05/26/87

-------
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC -- Pertinent   data   regarding   chronic    Inhalation
exposure  to succlnonltMle,  methacrylonltrlle  or  n1cot1non1tr1le could  not
be located In the available literature as  cited In  Appendix A.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC ~  Pertinent   data   regarding   subchronlc    oral
exposure  to sucdnonltrlle,  methacrylonltrlle  or  nicotlnonltrlle could  not
be located 1n the available literature as  cited 1n  Appendix A.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC ~ Pertinent data  regarding  chronic oral  exposure  to
succlnonHMle, methacrylonltrlle or  nicotlnonltrlle could  not be  located  In
the available literature  as cited In Appendix A.
6.1.3.   Other  Relevant    Information.    The   acute   systemic   toxlclty  of
succ1non1tr1le appears to  be  due to release of cyanide  by  metabolism  of  the
parent  compound.   At autopsy,  cyanide was  found  In  the  urine  and various
viscera of a man who  had been  receiving  Intramuscular  Injections  of  succlno-
nltrlle and  died following convulsions.   Cyanide derived from  succlnonltrlle
was thought  to be  the toxic  agent  (Marlgo and  Pappalardo,  1966).  The blood
of mice Injected 1ntraper1toneally  with succlnonltrlle contained  cyanide  and
thlocyanate  (a major  cyanide  metabolite)  (Doherty  et al.,  1982).  Pretreat-
ment  with  CC1.  lowered   the  blood  levels   of  cyanide  and thlocyanate  and
prevented  all  signs  of  toxlclty.   Also,  thlosulfate, a cyanide  antagonist,
protected mice treated with succlnonltrlle against  death.
    The  toxlclty  of  methacrylonltrlle also  appears to be due  to cyanide
liberation.  Pozzanl  et al. (1968)  found  that  a standard therapy  for cyanide
Intoxication reduced  the toxic effects of methacrylonltrlle 1n rats  and mice
after an  Inhalation  exposure.   Haguenoer et  al.  (1976)  found that  the time
to death  of rats  Injected Intraperltoneally correlated  positively with dose
and tissue  level  of cyanide (see Section 5.3.).

0033d                               -18-                             05/26/87

-------
    Other  toxic  effects  have been  observed  In  animals  treated  with  met-
hacrylonltMle and  sucdnonHMle.   Szabo and  Reynolds  (1975)  and Szabo  et
al. (1982) reported that methacrylon1tr1le and  sucdnonltrlle were weakly  to
moderately ulcerogenlc  and adrenocortlcolytlc  1n  Sprague-Oawley rats  dosed
either  orally  or  subcutaneously  (route  not  clearly specified), 3 times/day
for  4  days.   Total  doses were  34 mmol/kg  for methacrylonKrUe  and 5.3
mmol/kg for sucdnonltrlle.
    Information regarding  the toxlclty of n1cot1non1tr1le  1s  limited.   Majka
et al.  (1979)  found  that  n1cot1non1tr1le caused Irreversible opacity of the
cornea  when  Introduced Into  the  eyes  of  rats and  rabbits.   LD,.-  and  LC,.
values  for  methacrylonltMle are presented  1n Table  6-1.   The  oral   L05Q
for sucdnonltrlle  In rats  1s  450 mg/kg  and 129  mg/kg  for mice (Hartung,
1982);  the  IntraperHoneal  LD5Q   1s  63.1  mg/kg  (NIOSH,  1987).  The   oral
L05Q for mice  1n  rats  for  nlcotlnonltrlle 1s  1185 mg/kg  (NIOSH,  1987).
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data   regarding   the   cardnogenldty   of
sucdnonltrlle, nlcotlnonltrlle or  methacrylonltrlle by Inhalation exposure
could not be  located In the available literature as  dted  1n  Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.     Pertinent   data   regarding   the   cardnogenldty    of
succ1non1tr1le, nlcotlnonltrlle or  methacrylonltrlle by oral exposure  could
not be located In  the  available  literature  as  cited  1n Appendix  A.
6.2.3.   Other Relevant  Information.    Bolt   et  al.  (1986)   predicted   that
methacrylonltrlle  would prove more carcinogenic  than  the known carcinogen,
acrylonltMle.    Cardnogenldty   studies  with  methacrylonltrlle  were  not
located and this  chemical  1s not scheduled  for testing by NTP  (1987).
0033d                               -19-                             09/08/87

-------
or
                                  TABLE  6-1
                               Values  for Methacrylonltrlle
Species
Rat
Rat
Rat
Rat
Mouse
Mouse
RabbU
Rat
Mouse
Mouse
RabbU
Guinea pig
RabbU
Route of
Administration
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
Inhalation
Inhalation
Inhalation
Inhalation
Inhalation
dermal
L050 or LC50
250 mg/kg
25-50 mg/kg
240 mg/kg
120 mg/kg
20-25 mg/kg
11.6 mg/kg
16 mg/kg
328 ppm (900 mg/m3)
for 4 hours
36 ppm (99 mg/m3}
for 4 hours
400 ppm (1098 mg/m3)
for 4 hours
37 ppm (102 mg/m3)
for 4 hours
88 ppm (241 mg/m3)
for 4 hours
320 mg/kg
Reference
Anonymous, 1986
Hartung, 1982
Pozzanl et al.,
1968
Kurzallev, 1985
Hartung, 1982
Kurzallev, 1985
Kurzallev, 1985
Anonymous, 1986
Anonymous, 1986
Hartung, 1982
Anonymous, 1986
Anonymous, 1986
Pozzanl et al. ,
1968
0033d
             -20-
05/26/87

-------
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    N1cot1non1tr1le  was  not   mutagenlc   In  Salmonella  typhlmurlum  strains
TA98, TA100, TA1535  and TA1537 with or without rat  liver  S-9  when  tested  1n
the  spot  test  at   3   ymol/plate  (Florin  et  al.,  1980).   Pertinent  data
regarding the  mutagenlclty  of sucdnonltrlle or methacrylonltrlle  could  not
be located 1n the available literature as  cited  In  Appendix A.
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    SucclnonHrlle  appears  to be  a  teratogen  In  the  hamster.   Pregnant
Syrian  golden   hamsters  were dosed  Intraperltoneally  with  sucdnonltrlle
dissolved In distilled  water   (Doherty et  al.,  1983) on day 8 of  gestation.
The single doses of  sucdnonltrlle given  and the number  of dams  at  each  dose
level were  0.78-3.02 mmol/kg   (18), 4.56  mmol/kg  (9) and  6.24 mmol/kg  (10).
Six  dams received   water  Intraperltoneally and   served   as  controls.   The
hamsters were  sacrificed on  day  11  of gestation  and  the number of  resorp-
tlons and malformed  fetuses  were noted;  there  were  no malformed fetuses  1n
the  controls.   Doses of  sucdnonltrlle   ranging from  0.78-3.02  mmol/kg did
not  produce  significant  teratogenlc  effects,  although  2  fetuses had exen-
cephaly  and  one  fetus  had a  crooked  tall.  At  4.56  or 6.24 mmol/kg, a  high
Incidence of malformations  (60-8054  of the  Utters) was  noted  1n  the  off-
spring.  The  most  frequent   abnormalities  were  neural  tube defects  (exen-
cephaly  and  encephalocoele).   A  dose-related significantly  decreased crown-
rump  length  was  also   observed  at 4.56  and 6.24 mmol/kg.   Sucdnonltrlle
treatment did  not affect  the Incidence  of  resorptlons.   Maternal  toxldty
(dyspnea, hypothermia and ataxla)  was  evident  In  20% of  the animals  treated
at the higher doses.
    The  teratogenlc  effects  of sucdnonltrlle appear  to  be due to  cyanide
released during  metabolism  of the parent  molecule (Doherty et al.,  1983).


0033d                               -21-                             05/26/87

-------
Treatment  of  succlnonltrlle-dosed dams  with sodium  thlosulfate,  a  cyanide
antagonist, provided significant protection against  fetal  anomalies.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  teratogenlclty   of   n1cot1non1tr1le   and
methacrylonltrlle could not be  located  1n the available  literature as cited
In Appendix A.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
    Pertinent data  regarding  other  reproductive  effects of  sucdnonltrlle,
methacrylon1tr1le or  n1cot1non1tr1le could  not be  located  In the  available
literature as dted In Appendix A.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    One  study was  located  regarding  the toxldty  of  methacrylonltrlle  by
subchronlc  Inhalation exposure   (Pozzanl  et  al.,   1968).   In  this   study,
exposure  of   rats  to concentrations  >52.6  ppm  (>144 mg/m3), but  not  19.3
ppm  (53  mg/m3)   for 7  hours/day,  5  days/week  for  91  days  resulted  In
Increased  liver  weight  and  death.   Exposure  of  dogs  for 7  hours/day,  5
days/week  for 90  days  resulted  In transiently elevated SGOT and SGPT levels
at  8.8  ppm (24  mg/m3)  and  loss  of  motor control of  hind  limbs and  hlsto-
pathologlcal  brain  lesions  at  13.5  ppm  (37 mg/m3).    No  effects   were
observed In dogs  at 3.2 ppm  (9 mg/m3).
    The  acute toxldty of  the  nltrlles  appears  to be  due  to  release  of
cyanide  during  metabolism  of the  parent compound  (Marlgo and Pappalardo,
1966; Haguenoer et al.,  1976;  Pozzanl et al., 1968).
    Information  regarding  the carclnogenlclty  of  sucdnonltrlle,   nlcotlno-
nltrlle and methacrylonltrlle, and the  mutagenldty  of methacrylon1tr1le and
sucdnonltrlle was  not located.   One  study Indicated  that  n1cot1non1tr1le
was not mutagenlc 1n S.  typh1mur1um (Florin et al.,  1980).
0033d                               -22-                             05/26/87

-------
    A  study by  Doherty  et  al.  (1983)  Indicated  that  succlnonltMle  was
teratogenlc  In  hamsters  treated  1ntraper1toneally  at  >4.56  mmol/kg.   No
Information  was  located  regarding  the  teratogenlclty of  either  nlcotlno-
nltrlle or methacrylonltrlle.-
0033d                               -23-                             05/26/87

-------
                    7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    ACGIH (1986-1987) adopted a TWA-TLV  for  methacrylonltrlle of 1 ppm  or  3
mg/m3.  The  TLV was based  on the  subchronlc  Inhalation study using  beagle
dogs by Pozzanl et al.  (1968) and  by  analogy  to  acrylonltMle (ACGIH,  1986).
The  TWA   workplace   environmental   limit   for   a  10-hour  workshlft   for
sucdnonltrlle 1s  6 ppm (20 mg/m3)  NIOSH  (1978).
    Pertinent  guidelines  and standards  for  n1cot1non1tr1le, Including  EPA
ambient water  and  air  quality  criteria drinking  water standards,  FAO/WHO
ADIs, EPA  or  FDA  tolerances  for raw  agricultural commodities or foods,  and
ACGIH, NIOSH  or OSHA occupational  exposure  limits  could  not be located  In
the available literature as cited  1n Appendix A.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards for  the protection  of aquatic organisms  from
the effects  of the selected  nltrlles  could  not  be  located  1n the  available
literature as cited In Appendix  A.
0033d                               -24-                             09/09/87

-------
                              8.   RISK  ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
    Pertinent   data   regarding   the   carclnogenldty  of   succ1non1tr11e,
nlcotlnonltrlle  and  methacrylonltrlle  following   Inhalation,  oral or  other
routes  could  not  be  located   In   the  available  literature  as  dted  In
Appendix A.   Therefore,  an  EPA   classification  of 0  1s  assigned to  these
compounds.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS THAN  LIFETIME EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC)  -- The  only  study
that  examined  the toxldty of methacrylonltrlle after  subchronlc  Inhalation
exposure  Is  that  of  Pozzanl  et  al.  (1968).   Exposure of  rats  to  concentra-
tions >52.6  ppm  (>144  mg/m3),   but  not 19.3  ppm (53  mg/m3),  for 7  hours/
day,  5  days/week  for  91 days resulted 1n  Increased liver weight  and  death.
Exposure  of   dogs  for  7   hours/day,  5  days/week  for  90 days  resulted  In
transiently  elevated  SGOT and SGPT  levels at  8.8 ppm  (24  mg/m3) and  loss
of motor  control  of  hind  limbs  and  hlstopathologlcal  brain  lesions at  13.5
ppm  (37  mg/m3).   No  effects were  observed  In  dogs  at 3.2 ppm  (9 mg/m3).
Thus, the  LOAEL 1s 24 mg/m3.  Expanding this  exposure concentration  over  a
24-hour  day  and 7 day-week  gives  a  calculated LOAEL  of  5 mg/m3.  The  NOEL
1s 9  mg/m3.   Expanding  this  exposure  over a 24-hour  day  and a 7-day  week,
and  multiplying  by  the  reference  dog  Inhalation rate  of   4.3 mVday  and
dividing by the reference dog body weight  of 12.7  kg  (U.S. EPA,  1985)  yields
a NOEL of  0.63  mg/kg/day.   Dividing  by an uncertainty  factor of 100 (10  for
Interspedes  extrapolation  and  10  to  protect sensitive  Individuals),  the
subchronlc RfD  human  exposure level  1s  estimated  as  0.006 mg/kg/day  or  0.4
0033d                               -25-                             09/09/87

-------
mg/day  for  a 70  kg  human.   Dividing  the  RfD exposure  level  by  20  mVday,
the Inhalation rate for a 70 kg  human,  yields  a  concentration  1n air  of 0.02
mg/m3.
    Pertinent data  regarding  the effects  of subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure
to succlnonltrlle  or  n1cot1non1tr1le could  not  be located In  the available
literature as cited 1n Appendix A.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES -- Pertinent data regarding  the  effects  of
chronic   Inhalation   exposure   of   methacrylon1tr1le,   succlnonltrlle   or
n1cot1non1tr1le could not be located  1n  the  available  literature as  cited In
Appendix A.  A chronic Inhalation RfD  for  methacrylonltrlle can  be estimated
by  dividing  the   subchronlc  Inhalation  RfD  by  an  additional  uncertainty
factor  of  10.   Applying  the  additional   uncertainty   factor,  the  chronic
Inhalation  RfD  for methacrylonltrlle  Is  0.002 mg/m3,  or  0.04 mg/day  for  a
70 kg  human.   The level of confidence In this  RfD  1s  medium because  It 1s
based  on  a well  conducted  subchronlc study using two  species;  both a NOEL
and a LOAEL can be distinguished from the observations  and results.
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES (SUBCHRONIC) -- Pertinent  data
regarding  the  effects  of  subchronlc  oral  exposure  to  methacrylonltrlle,
succlnonltrlle  and nicotlnonltrlle  could  not  be located  1n  the available
literature  as  cited  In  Apppendlx A.   A  subchronlc oral RfD for  methacrylo-
nltrlle can  be  calculated  using Inhalation data  from Pozzanl  et al.  (1968).
The NOEL  from the  study of  Pozzanl  et al.  (1968) occurred at  a concentration
of 9  mg/m3,  7  hours/day,   5  days/week.   Expanding  for  an equivalent  human
exposure  and multiplying  by   the  reference  Inhalation  rate  of  4.3  ma/day
for  a  dog  and  by an  absorption factor  of 0.5,  and  then  dividing by  the
reference  dog body weight  of  12.7  kg, a transformed  animal  dose of 0.32
mg/kg/day can be calculated.
0033d                               -26-                             09/10/87

-------
The  RfD  1s  calculated by dividing  the  NOEL by an uncertainty  factor  of  100
(10  for  Interspedes extrapolation and  10 for sensitive  Individuals).   The
calculated subchronlc oral RfD  Is 0.003  mg/kg/day, or  0.2  mg/day for a 70 kg
human.
    The level of  confidence  In  the subchronlc oral RfD  1s  low  because H Is
based  on  only  one  study (Pozzanl  et al.,  1968),  and  because this  was  an
Inhalation study of the toxldty of methacrylonltrlle.
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES -- Pertinent  data  regarding the effects  of
chronic oral  exposure to methacrylonltrlle,  succ1non1tr1le and  methacrylo-
nltrlle  could  not   be  located  In  the  available  literature  as  dted  In
Appendix A.    A  chronic  oral  RfD  can  be  derived  by  dividing the  subchronlc
oral  RfD  by  an  additional   uncertainty  factor  of  10  to  extrapolate  from
subchronlc  to chronic exposure.   Dividing the subchronlc  RfD derived  from
the  study  of Pozzanl  et  al.  (1968)  by  10,  a chronic  oral  RfD of  0.0003
mg/kg/day,  or  0.02  mg/day   for  a  70 kg  human  1s  derived.   The  level  of
confidence  1n this   RfD  Is   low  for  reasons  stated  previously  (see  Section
8.2.2.1.)  and because the  study  was  subchronlc.
0033d                               -27-                              09/09/87

-------
                          9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The toxldty of methacrylonHMle was discussed  1n  Chapter  6.   Table  9-1
summarizes the only studies  1n  which toxic effects  of  subchronlc  or  chronic
exposure were observed.
    Reportable  quantities  were  determined using  data  from  the  subchronlc
Inhalation  toxlclty  study  of  methacrylonltrlle  by  Pozzanl  et al.  (1968).
The most  severe  effect,  death  1n Harlan-Wlstar rats, occurred  at  an  equiva-
lent human dose  of  3.27  mg/kg/day.   Dividing by an  uncertainty  factor  of 10
to approximate chronic exposure and 70 kg  gives an MED  of  22.9  mg/day (Table
9-2).   This  MED corresponds  to an  RV.  of  3.5.   The  RV   corresponding  to
death   1s  10,  and  multiplication  of this  RVg by   the  RVd yields a CS  of
35.  This CS corresponds to  an  RQ of 100  (see  Table 9-2).
    The  second  most  severe  effects  were loss of motor control 1n the  hind
limbs  of  beagle  dogs  and histopathologlcal  brain  lesions,  which occurred at
a  human   equivalent dose of  1.48 mg/kg/day.   When   this  Is  divided by  an
uncertainty  factor  of  10  (to  convert   subchronlc   exposure  to  chronic
exposure) and  then  multiplied  by 70  kg, a MED of  10.4 mg/day  1s  obtained.
This MED  corresponds   to an  RV. of  4.0.  The RV  corresponding to  loss  of
motor  control  1s 9 and  multiplication   of  this  RV  by  the  RV. yields a  CS
of 36 (see Table 9-2).  This CS corresponds to an  RQ  of  100.
    The  third  most  severe  effect  was a marked  but  transitory  elevation of
SGOT and  SGPT values  1n beagle dogs.   This  occurred  at a human  equivalent
dose of  0.96  mg/kg/day.   Division of this dose by 10  (to  convert  subchronlc
to  chronic  exposure)  and  multiplication   by  70  kg yields  an MED  of  6.7
mg/day.  This MED corresponds to an RV.  of  4.3.
0033d                               -28-                             09/09/87

-------



























10
u
3



On

41
S
C
e
J"
£
1 I

IS o
OB **»
* >•
1
J>
>.
u
X
e
h-
e
e
i




































41

e
^
VI
41
at












u •**
f 41 >»
e vi >o
41 O -0
i— a >»
•0 01
> C Jrt
111


•O-'l-.
i o £
O "X
u. i- 01

** *e 7
r" < ^*



Jtf
41
yt
 -o >»
3 rfl Tl
VI
o • •—
X >V
I/I **-
a

^*



o

x




c

u

00

VI
41

U
41
a
V)


o

VI
vi -O
o e vi
-II
VI VI VI
** "841
41 ^
*. »— e
<*. «•
41 tJ 10
V> ^ A
Z £
O f—

•o — u
41 —
u i— 01
ceo
41 1- i—
— i-> O
1- C .C
41 O —
g-us.
4) 1- O
Of
m «« vi




03


~




-a







T
*+.
n
u-v

r?





rt









•o
41

01

41
J3

i"
O
O
Ji
VI
e vi
>0 41
U 3
iO
3
a r-
9 (S
41 OO

u. T3
S 10


o

41 bO
U
e <*-
41 O

u e
41 O
X ««

3>
CO 41
•— «




CP

e



u
2







•
>
*
1
03

03


























^ w
41 41

^m «•

41 41
Z Z
I— F~
41 41
fc. U

41 41
VI VI

41 41

U U
C C

• • ••
13 •«

41 4l

CNl Ol CM Ol

£S ^$




CO CM

«0 n




O3 CM
a* on






-~ -~
e •
7 7
^3 ^^
8 S
I 1
n >o

0> CM
o fcn





CM
i




!o
^^
Vt

I
c


^

3J

1o
ac






Ol
i
^
a*

^

Of

*-

ti
'eu



41
VI
<
o
4)
5*1"

'S

41 d
Ift 4>
"vt5
551
1^*1 Ol
X —
•o

•N. S
VI
| m
>i03
C
o •
= 2
e 
41 •
C -«^
U VI
41 »
^

•a
41


^B
3
U

U
w
















































^.
03
hU

3
~
JC
r*
CM
^
VI
—

Ol
i
><
o

i1
•a

41
u
C
41

41

41
Of
•a
















































^
03
a.

d
~
•"
in
"

V*
_

Ol
s
»,
0

iO
k.

41
U
c
41

41

41
ac
41
0033d
-29-
09/09/87

-------
                     o

                     c
                     o
                                    co
                                   U LU —•
                                  — JC >»
                                   c    
                                   1/13.*
                                   CSV.
                                   •B — g»
                                   u c i
                                     co
                      u
                      0)
                      a.
                      CO
                                               Lit
                                                        o
                                                        o
                                                        eo
                                                        en
                                                 o
                                                 o
                                                                sO
                                                                <\J
                                                                l_
                                                                o
                                                a>
                                                uri

                                                CO
                                                        o
                                                        u
                                                        °-§
                                                        ••-• E
                                                        o c

                                                        wi J=
                                                        1/1
                                                        O C
                                                    
                                                                 a>
ja
^.
o>
o
                                                                           00
                                                                           vO
                                                                           M

                                                                           O

                                                                           Q.
                                                                           O
                                                                           co
0033d
                                  -30-
                             09/08/87

-------
    The  RVg associated  with elevation  of  SCOT  and  SGPT values  Is 6  and
multiplication  of  this  RVg  by  the  RVd  yields  a  CS  of  26.    The  RQ
associated with this CS 1s 100 (see Table 9-2).
    The RQs  determined  from  the three effects  (death,  loss of  motor  control
1n  hind  limbs  and elevated  SGOT  and SGPT  levels)  are the same  (100).   The
highest  CS   (36)  corresponded  to  the  effect  of  loss  of  motor control  and
brain  lesions  In dogs  and  this was  chosen as the  basis  for  the  RQ  (Table
9-3).   Data   were   Insufficient   to  derive   RQs   for   sucdnonltrlle   and
nlcotlnonltrlle (Tables 9-4 and  9-5).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the   cardnogenlclty  of   methacrylonltrlle,
succlnlnonltrlle  or  nlcotlnonltrlle could  not be  located 1n  the  available
literature as  cited  In  Appendix A; therefore an RQ  based  on  cardnogenlclty
cannot be derived.
0033d                               -31-                             05/26/87

-------
                                  TABLE 9-3
                              MethacrylonltMle
          Minimum Effective Dose (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)

Route:                  Inhalation
Dose*:                  10.4 mg/day
Effect:                 loss of  motor  control  and  brain  lesions
Reference:              Pozzanl  et al.,  1968
RVd:                    4.0
RVe:                    9
Composite Score:         36
RQ:                     100
^Equivalent human dose
0033d                               -32-                             05/26/87

-------
                                  TABLE 9-4



                                SucclnonHMIe



          Minimum Effective Dose (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)









Route:



Dose:



Effect:



Reference:



RVd:



RVe:



Composite Score:



RQ:                     Data were Insufficient to derive an RQ
0033d                              -33-                             05/26/87

-------
                                  TABLE 9-5



                               N1cot1non1tr1le



          Minimum  Effective Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity  (RQ)










Route:



Dose:



Effect:



Reference:



RVd:



RVe:



Composite Score:



RQ:                     Data were Insufficient to derive an RQ
0033d                               -34-                             05/26/87

-------
                                10.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986.
Documentation of the Threshold  Limit  Values and Biological Indices,  5th  ed.
Cincinnati, OH.   p. 370.

ACGIH   (American   Conference   of   Governmental   Industrial    Hyglenlsts).
1986-1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit Values and  Biological  Exposure  Indices  for
1986-1987.  Cincinnati,  OH.   p.  23.

AldMch.   1984-1985.   Aldrlch  Catalog/Handbook  of  Fine  Chemicals.   Aldrlch
Chemical Co., Milwaukee,  MI.

Anonymous.   1986.   Methyl  acrylonltrlle.   Dangerous  Prop.  Ind. Mater. Rep.
6(1): 76-81.

Bolt, H.M.,  H.  Peter  and H.J.  Wlegand.   1986.   Biological reactive  metabo-
lites 1n human toxldty.   Adv.  Exp.  Med.  B1ol.  197:  1013-1016.

Cavanna,  R.  and  F. Pocchlarl.   1972.   Fate  of  sucdnon1tr11e-l-l4C 1n  the
mouse.  Blochem.  Pharmacol.   21(18):  2529-2531.

CMR   (Chemical   Marketing  Reporter).    1986.   1987  OPD  Chemical  Buyers
Directory, 74th  ed.  Schnell  Publishing Co., Inc., New York.

Contessa,   A.R.  and R.  Santl.   1973.   Liberation  of  cyanide  from  sucdno-
nltrlle.  Blochem.  Pharmacol.   22(7):  827-832.


0033d                               -35-                              05/26/87

-------
Contessa, A.R., M.  Floreanl,  A.C.  Bonettl and  R.  Santl.  1978.  Liberation



of  cyanide  from  succlnonHMle.    2.   The   effect   of   ethanol.   Blochem.



Pharmacol.  27(8):  1135-1138.







Curry, S.H.  1974.   Excretion  of  succlnonltrlle  In mice.   IRCS  Llbr. Compend.



2(7): 1444.  (CA 082/025606H)







Curry, S.H.  1975.   Cumulative excretion  of succlnonltrlle In mice.  Blochem.



Pharmacol.  24(3):  351-354.







Dean, J.A., Ed.  1985.  Lanne's Handbook of Chemistry, 13th ed.  McGraw-Hill



Book Co., New York.  p.  7-245.







DIGeronlmo, M.J.  and A.D.  Antolne.   1976.    Metabolism  of acetonltMle and



proplonltMle  by  Nocardla   rhodochrous.   Appl.  Environ.  Mlcroblol.   31:



900-906.







Doherty, P.A., R.P. Smith and V.H. Perm.  1982.  Tetramethyl substitution on



succlnonltMle  confers  pentelenetetrazol-llke  activity   and  blocks cyanide



release 1n mice.  J. Phamarcol.  Exp.  Ther.  223(3): 635-641.







Doherty,  P.A.,  R.P.  Smith and V.H.  Perm.  1983.   Comparison of the terato-



genlc  potential  of  two  aliphatic  nitrlles In  hamsters: Succlnonltrlle and



tetramethylsucdnonltrlle.  Fund.  Appl.  Toxlcol.  3(1): 41-48.







E1senre1ch,  S.3.,  B.B.  Looney  and  J.D.  Thornton.   1981.  Airborne organic



contaminants  of  the Great  Lakes  ecosystem.   Environ. Sc1. Technol.   15(1):



30-38.





0033d                               -36-                            09/09/87

-------
Floreanl, M.,  F.  Carpenedo,  R. Santl  and  A.R.  Contessa.  1980.   Studies  on
the systems  Involved  1n  sucdnonltMle metabolism  In  Hver.   Pharmacol.  Res.
Commun.  12(5): 433-439.

Floreanl, M.,  F.  Carpenedo,  R. Santl  and  A.R.  Contessa.  1981.   Metabolism
of  sucdnlnonUrlle  In  liver:  Studies on  the  systems  Involved   1n  cyanide
release.  Eur. J.  Drug Metab.  Pharmacol.   6(2):  135-140.

Florin,  I.,  L. Rutberg,  M.  Curvall  and  C.R.  Enzell.   1980.  Screening  of
tobacco  smoke   constituents   for   mutagenlclty   using   the  Ames1   test.
Toxicology.   15:  219-232.

Haguenoer,  3.M.,  B. Fromont,  J. Dequldt and M.C. Jacquemont.   1976.   Experi-
mental  poisoning  by  methacrylonltrlle.  Bull.  Soc.  Pharm. Lille.   32(2-3):
185-196.

Hansch,  C.  and A.3.  Leo.  1984.   Medchem Project.    Issue  No.  26.   Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hartung, R.   1982.  Cyanides  and  nltrlles.   IJK  Patty's  Industrial  Hygiene
and Toxicology, Vol.  IIC, G.D. Clayton and F.E. Clayton,  Ed.   John Wiley and
Sons Inc.,  New York.   p.  4863-4900.

Hashimoto,   S.,  H.  Bandow, H.  Aklmoto,  J.H.  Meng   and   X.Y.  Tang.   1984.
Products and mechanism   for   the  hydroxyl  radical   Initiated  oxidation  of
acrylonltrlle, methacrylonltrlle and  allylcyanlde  1n  the  presence of  nitric
oxide.  Int. J.  Chem.  Klnet.   16(11):  1385-1400.


0033d                                -37-                              09/09/87

-------
Hawley,  G.G.    1981.    The  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,  10th  ed.    Van
Nostrand Relnhold Co., New York.   p.  430.

H1ne,  J. and  P.K.  Mookerjee.'  1975.   The Intrinsic hydrophlllc character  of
organic compounds.   Correlations  1n terms  of structural contributions.   J.
Org. Chem.   49(3):  292-298.

Jaffe, H.H. and  G.O.  Doak.   1955.   The  basicities of substituted  pyMcMnes
and their 1-oxides.  J.  Am.  Chem.  Soc.   77:  4441-4444.

Kuney,  J.H.,  Ed.   1985.   Chemcyclopedla  1986,  Vol.  4.   American  Chemical
Society, Washington, DC.

Kurzallev,  S.A.   1985.   Characteristics of  the  toxic  effect of  methacrylo-
nltrlle.  Gig. Tr.  Prof. Zabol.   5:  37-40.   (Rus.)   (CA 103/033202R)

Lod1,  F.,  E.  Marozzl, G. Barbl and  C.A.  Maggl.   1973.   Pharmacoklnetlcs  of
succlnc acid  dlnUrlle.  Farmaco.  Ed.  Prat.   28(2):  105-114.    (In  Italian
with English translation)

Lutln, P.A.  1970.  Removal of organic nltrlles  from wastewater systems.   J.
Water Pollut.  Control Fed.  42:  1632-1642.

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and  D.H. Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical
Property Estimation  Methods.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co., New  York.  p.  4-9,  5-5,
7-5, 15-13, 15-21,  15-27.
0033d                               -38-                             09/09/87

-------
Majka,  3.,  K.  Knochbloch and S.  Szividzikowski.   1979.   Evaluation  of  acute



toxlclty  of  3-cyanopyridinc.   Mod.  Pr.    30(2):   109-113.    (Pol.)    (CA



092/016527N)







Malaney,  G.W.   and  R.M.  Gerhold.   1969.    Structural  determinants  in  the



oxidation  of  aliphatic  compounds  by  activated  sludge.    J.  Water  Pollut.



Control Fed.  4: R18-R33.







Marlgo,  M.  and  G.  Pappalardo.   1966.   A  ratal  incident  Horn  therapeutic



administration of succinonHMle.  Med. Leg.  Assicur.   14:  155-185.   (Hal.)



(Cited in NIOSH, 1978)







Merkow, L.P., S.H.  Lipton,  J.J. Lalich and  P.M. Strong.    1959.   Metabolism



of amlno nHrlle and  related  compounds  by the rat.   Cxptl. Biol.  Med.   102:



728-732.  (CA 54:59601)







Neely,  W.B.  and G.C.  Blau.   1985.  Environmental  Exposure from  Chemicals,



Vol. 1.  CRC Press  Inc., Boca  Raton,  FL.   p.  31.







Nemec,  J.  and  L.S.  Kirch.   1981.   Methacryllc  acid and  derivatives,   in:



Kirk Othmer  encyclopedia of  Chemical  Technology,  Vol.   15,   3rd  ed.,  M.



Grayson and D.  Eckroth,  Ed.   John Wiley and  Sons,  New York.  p.  363.







NIOSH  (National  Institute   for  Occupational Safety  and  Health).    1978.



Criteria  for  Recommended  Standard...Occupational   Exposure   to   NUri>$



NIOSH, Washington,  DC.
0033d                               -39-                              09/08/87

-------
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety  and  Health).   1987.   KILCS
(Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical  Substances).  On-line:  January,  1987.

NTP   (National  Toxicology   Program).    1987.   Management   Status   Report.
January 13, 1987.

Offermanns, H., A.  Kleemann,  H.  Tanner,  H. Beschke and  H.  freidrich.   1984.
Vitamins  (nlcotamide  and  nicotlnic acid).   In:  Klrk-Othmer  encyclopedia  of
Chemical Technology, Vol. 24,  3rd  ed.,  M. Grayson and D.  Eckroth,  Ed.   John
Wiley and Sons, New York.   p. 65-67.

Perry,  R.H.  and  0. Green.   1984.  Perry's Chemical  Handbook.   Physical  and
Chemical Data, 6th ed.  McGraw-Hill Book  Co.,  New York.

Peter,  H.  and H.M. Bolt.  1985.   Effect  of  antidotes on  the  acute  toxicity
of methacrylonitrile.   FYI   Submission  to OTS.   Doc.  ID  FYI-OTS-0385-0390.
(Also published in Int. Arch. Occup.  Environ.  Health.   55:  175-177)

Pozzanl, U.C., C.R. Kinkead  and  J.M.  King.  1968.  The mammalian toxicity of
methacrylonitrile.  Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc.  J.  29(3): 202-210.

Riddlck, J.A., W.B. Bunger and T.K. Sakano.   1986.   Techniques  of  Chemistry.
Vol.   II: Organic Solvents.  John Wiley  and Sons,  New  York.

Sadtler.   1961.    Sadtler  Standard UV  Spectra  No.  5426.   Sadtler  Research
Laboratory, Philadelphia, PA.
0033d                                40-                             09/08/87

-------
SchmoHz, I., A.  Wenger,  D.  Hoffmann and T.C.  Tso.   1979.   Chemical  shid'^s
on  tobacco  smoke: 63.  On  the  fate  of  nicotine  during  pyrolysls and  in  a
burning cigarette.  3. Agric.  Food Chem.   27(3): 602-609.

Smiley,  R.A.    1981.   Nitriles.   In:  Kirk-Othmer  Encyclopedia  of  Chemical
Technology,  Vol.  15,  3rd  ed.,  M.  Grayson,  Ed.   John Wiley  and  Sons,  New
York.  p. 888-909.

SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1985.    1985  Directory  of  Chemical
Producers: United States of America.   SRI International,  Menlo Park,  CA.

Swarm,  R.L., D.A. Laskowski, P.O. McCall, K. Vander  Kuy  and H.J.  Dishburger.
1983.  A  rapid  method  for the  estimation  of  the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water  partition  coefficient, soil  sorption constant,  water  to  air
ratio and water  solubility.  Res. Rev.   85:  17-28.

Szabo,   S.  and   E.S.  Reynolds.    1975.    Structure-activity  relations   Tor
ulcerogenlc  and  adrenocortlcolytlc  effects  of  alky!  nitriles,  amines  and
thiols.  Environ.  Health Perspect.  11:  135  140.

Szabo,   S.,   E.S.   Reynolds   and  S.H.  linger.    1982.    Structur t>  activity
relations between  alkyl nucleophlllc  chemicals causing  duodenal  uif^r  anrt
adrcnocortical necrosis.  J.  Pharmacol.  Exp.  Ther.   223(1):  68-76.

Tanii,   H.   and  K.  Hashimoto.    1984a.   Structure-toxicity  relationship  of
aliphatic nitriles.   Toxicol.  Lett.   22(2):  267-272.
0033d                                41 -                              09/08/87

-------
Tanll,  H.  and  K.  Hashimoto.   1984b.   Studies  on  the mechanism  of  acute
toxldty of nHrlles In mice.   Arch.  Toxlcol.   55(1):  47-54.

Tan11, H. and K.  Hashimoto.  1985.   Structure-acute toxldty  relationship  of
dlnltrlles In mice.  Arch.  Toxlcol.   57(2):  88-93.

Tan11, H. and K.  Hashimoto.   1986.   Influence of ethanol on  the  \n_ vivo and
1n vitro metabolism of nltrlles 1n mice.   Arch. Toxlcol.  58(3):  171-176.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  1n the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect   Assessment  Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.   45(231):  49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1984.    Methodology  and  Guidelines  for   Reportable  Quantity
Determinations   Based  on Chronic  Toxldty  Data.   Prepared  by the Office  of
Health  and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment
Office, Cincinnati, OH  for the Office of  Solid Waste  and Emergency Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1985.   Reference  Values  for  Risk  Assessment.    First   Draft,
ECAO-CIN-477.  Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Methodology  for   Evaluating  Potential Cardnogenldty  In
Support  of  Reportable  Quantity Adjustments Pursuant  to CERCLA  Section  102.
Prepared  by  the  Office  of  Environmental  Health   Assessment, Carcinogen
Assessment Group, Washington, DC  for  the  Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency
Response, Washington, DC.


0033d                               -42-                            09/09/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.    1907a.    Graphical   exposure   Modeling   System  (GEMS).    CIDGP
computer program.  Office of Toxic Substances,  Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1987b.   Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System   (GCMS).   fate  of
Atmospheric Pollutants  (FAP).  Office of Toxic  Substances,  Washington,  DC.

Willhite, C.C. and R.P.  Smith.  1981.   The  role  of  cyanide liberation  in the
acute  toxicity   of  aliphatic  nltriles.   Toxicol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   59(3):
589-602.

Wlndholz, M.,  Ed.   1983.   The Merck Index, 10th ed.   Merck and Co.,  Inc.,
Rahway,  NJ.   p.  850.
0033d                                43-                              09/08/87

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE  SEARCHED



    This  HCCl)  is  based  on  data  identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:
         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Statu-, Report)
         TOXLINE
         TOXBACK 76
         FOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         federal Register
These searches were  conducted  in January, 1987.  In  addition,  hand searches

were made of  Chemical  Abstracts  (Collective Indices  5-9),  and  the following

secondary sources should be reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hygienists).
    1986.  Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hygienists).
    1906 1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit  Values  for  Chemical Substances In
    the  Work  environment  adopted by  ACGIH  with  Intended Changes  for
    1986-1987.  Cincinnati, OH.  Ill  p.

    Clayton,  G.D.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton,  G.D.  and   F.C.  Clayton,  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2B.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,  G.D.  and   F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.    1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and   Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed.,  Vol.  2C.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.
0033d
09/08/87

-------
    Grayson, M.  and D.  Eckroth,  Ed.  19701984.   Kirk -Ottimer  Encyclo-
    pedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd  cd.   John  Wiley  and Sons,  NY.  23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.I.  Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd ed
    Publishing Sciences Group, Inc., Littleton, MA.  57b p,

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on  Cancer).    IARC  Mono
    graphs  on   the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic   Risk   of  Chemicals  to
    Humans.   WHO, IARC, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabcy,  A.T.   Lieu,  T.W.  Chou  and H.L.  Johnson.
    1904.   Data  acquisition   Tor   environmental   transport   and   fate
    screening Tor compounds  of interest  to  the  Office of Solid  Waste.
    SRI   International,  Menlo   Park,  CA.    EPA   600/604-010.    NTIS
    PB84 243906.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).  1906.    Toxicology Research and
    Testing   Program.   Chemicals   on   Standard   Protocol.    Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P.  and   J.A.  King.   1977.   Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co., NY.

    Sax, I.N.   1904.   Dangerous Properties  of  Industrial  Materials, 6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1986.   Directory  of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park, CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1906.   Report  on  Status  Report   in  the Special  Review
    Program,  Registration   Standards  Program   and  the  Data  Call  in
    Programs.   Registration  Standards and  the  Data  Call  in  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs,  Washington, DC.

    U.S. EPA.   1905.  CSB  Existing  Chemical Assessment  Tracking  System.
    Name and  CAS Number Ordered  Indexes.   Office of Toxic  Substances,
    Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International   Trade  Commission).    1985.    Synthetic-
    Organic   Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and   Sales,  1984,  USIIC  Publ.
    1422, Washington,  DC.

    Verschueren, K.  1983.   Handbook  of  Environmental  Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd  ed.   Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., NY.

    Windholz, M., Ed.  1983.  The Merck Index, 10th  ed.   Merck  and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and  S.B. Walker,  Ed.   1983.   The Pesticide  Manual.
    British  Crop Protection Council.  695  p.
0033d                                45-                             09/08/87

-------
    In addition,  approximately  30  compendia  of  aquatic  toxicity  data wore

reviewed, including the following:


    Battcllc's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data   Book.   Volume  3.   Effects  of  Chemicals  on  Aquatic  Life.
    Selected  Data  From the LHrrature  through 1968.   Prepared for the
    U.S.  EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington, DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and M.T. Mnley.   1980.  Handbook of  Acute  Toxicity
    of  Chemicals  to   fish and   Aquatic   Invertebrates.   Summaries  of
    Toxicity  Tests  Conducted  at Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965 1978.    U.S.  Dcpt.  Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Pub!.  137,  Washington, DC.

    McKee,  J.E.  and H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water  Quality Criteria, 2nd ed.
    Prepared  for  the  Resources  Agency  of  California,  State  Water
    Quality Control Board.   Publ. No. 3-A.

    Pimental, D.   1971.  Ecological  Effects  of Pesticides  on Non Target
    Species.  Prepared for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.  PB -269605.

    Schneider, B.A.   1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book  1: Toxicology  Data.   Office  of Pesticide Programs, U.S.
    [PA,  Washington,  DC.   EPA  540/9  79-003.  NTIS PB 80-196876.
                     U.S. Environmental Protection A«enqi
                     Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                     77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th FtaBf
                     Chicago. »L  60604-3590
0033d                                46-                             09/08/87

-------
e
o

41
U
41
4l

at



«
^
o
a
Of



^j.
u
4)
fcw
tw









41
S
M
UJ








^
41
1
















CO CO
en en
•-" •-•
cs • c •

IN iq N IV
o •* o •— a
0. 41 0. 41 -i
L.
i- O
o
s
" 0.
w» 5;?
CM 1* O 'O
O 13 O ^
• >> -en
O 01 OB
14. * £ P, O
ac o at o — i
i i
•o -o

VI C VI C

4) 41
II II 2

>> ti >t at

•3 "3 -3*3
»» >. ^ >» •x ^
iq en 4i IQ en 4i
•O Jtf J= "O J< JZ
•S. *i» U >. N» u
u. E u B
3 VI 4) 3 vi 4)
e >»o s o >>co B
•O • vi 5 • vi
r^ o S — ^ o ?. —
~*9> ***• -~«n • — •
•X e uj en< V O uj en<
o>fcw o B O enu. o B O
en 41 CM en 4i CM


CL 9% O* ^L B* Qk *» Qt CL 5P
CM -o eo CM -o eo
• rg • m • CM • to a




I I 2


4)
i.
3
VI
O >>
a «j
X — 4)
UJ U U
*- 3
e u c vi
0 — 41 0
— c 01 a
-^ o u ox
r— ^ C —
iq u o u i—
•i fcO O U O
CO CO CO
en en en
r— (— ^
'S " "e r "S r
•q ^™ (q >•- *q *••
Mm h* 
J< >»
•S n 5
en x. o o>
§? ij
O Cwj O O
•• o •• o
>»- i_ u. u a
ai o of o —
^ H-
•ej •o
41 V 4) -O
vi e vi e

41 41
e o e o a

4) 4)

• 9 • 3
>» « >» t5
» 0 V. u
VI VI VI VI
3 VI — 41 _J 3 VI — 41 _J
0 >•_! I UJ O >.-J B UJ
^ O — — .— '"o— — ~
•—en • ^en •
011^ ^ B V 5"*" *O B ^
j< ep^ en j< cn^ eyi



a. >*CM aiU1) OL >*csj aiu1!
«a n eo <« co eo
CM -0 • CO • CM -0 • CO • 0
o • e • a • o a o a




en 01
o o a
TS -a —•
». ^
— «*
 — u
1— o ^
^ •* 41
— i en
1— u O
>i z — e

— a e u


u e uj u u
— 41—1
§01 ea e c
u o « o o
^ •" C ^~
js e: -^ CK ~o •&
u o u a 4* 4»
j3 t* w O» i^ i^
3 J= i« UJ ifl ifl
«/> U U OC CO CO























41
e
o
e

o
u
"c
c
4t
'c
o
e
u
u
3
VI
k.
O
VI
1
01

u
a
0
+*
e
u

<^w
(^
3
VI
C


41
3
19
•»•
a
•t-














































2
3


e
41

u


3
C
^^
IJ
a
0033d
-47-
09/08/87

-------