.696
905K91001
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
GREAT LAKES POLLUTION PREVENTION ACTION PLAN
April 12, 1991
The United States is committed to ensuring a healthy Great Lakes ecosystem in which
threatened species, such as the bald eagle, can successfully reproduce, and fish and
wildlife are safe for consumption in unrestricted amounts. In order to achieve these
environmental objectives, the levels of toxic substances found in the Lakes must be
reduced significantly.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Great Lakes States
will implement an ambitious effort to reduce the levels of toxic substances found in tfie-
Great Lakes Basin by promoting pollution prevention activities to significantly reduce
or eliminate the use and/or release of toxic substances at the source, with a special
focus on reducing or eliminating persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances. Pollution
prevention activities will complement current Great Lakes efforts to reduce toxics, such
as placing stringent permit limits on generators of toxics and remediating contaminated
sediments.
In 1987, as part of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, the United States and
Canada committed to strengthening efforts to achieve the goal of virtually eliminating
the release of persistent toxic substances into the Great Lakes Basin environment. This
Pollution Prevention Action Plan for the Great Lakes marks a concerted effort to turn
this goal into a reality.
Further, with the adoption of the national EPA Pollution Prevention Strategy and
passage by Congress of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990, EPA is firmly committed
to promoting pollution prevention in every aspect of the Agency's operations. The
Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 declares as national policy that pollution prevention
is the preferred approach to environmental protection: reducing or eliminating pollution
through, for instance, changes in production processes and/or by reducing reliance on
environmentally harmful materials. When preventing pollution is not feasible, recycling
in an environmentally safe manner is the next preferred option, followed by treatment.
-------
Disposal or other release into the environment should be the management option of last
resort, and should only be done in an environmentally protective manner.
-5
EPA places a high priority on incorporating this hierarchy of options into all Agency
activities and on encouraging all sectors of society - including government, industry,
agriculture, transportation, educational institutions and individual consumers - to
incorporate pollution prevention into their environmental decision-making as well.
Industry, in particular, is increasingly aware that reevaluating products and processes
for environmental reasons can lead to improvements that pay off competitively in lower
costs and higher quality. A commitment to pollution prevention is a commitment to
' innovation - and innovation is the kef to a competitive ,U.S. economy.
This Action Plan for the Great Lakes highlights how EPA will incorporate, in
partnership with the States, pollution prevention into overall efforts to reduce the use
and release of toxic substances in the Great Lakes Basin. These activities are designed
;to complement efforts/already underway at the State and Federal levels. The Great
Lakes States have laid much of the groundwork for promoting pollution prevention by
pursuing a wide range of innovative programs. These include technical assistance
efforts, demonstration projects, research programs, recognition of success through-
awards., education efforts, training'initiatives, and facility planning requirements. Some
States are also currently exploring ideas such as multi-media .permitting, incorporating
pollution prevention efforts into enforcement activities, linking permit fees to toxic
generation rates, and addressing barriers to pollution prevention found in regulations.
EPA will continue to coordinate closely with the States, provide funding for State
pollution prevention activities, and target efforts under this Action Plan to complement
and enhance State initiatives throughout the Great Lakes Basin.
This Action Plan has two distinct components. First it includes new initiatives
designed to promote innovative pollution prevention practices throughout the Basin.
Second, it involves reorienting and refocusing existing activities, such as enforcement
.actions,'to ensure that pollution prevention is an integral part of government's
environmental protection efforts. This Action Plan also builds upon the national EPA
Pollution Prevention Strategy. The focus of the national strategy is reducing on-going
generation of toxic pollution in any form (air emissions, wasiewater discharges,
hazardous waste, runoff, or fugitive releases) through reduction in the use of toxic
substances, process changes,, product changes, etc. In this Action Plan, EPA, in
partnership with the Stales and municipalities, will:
». Target, for pollution prevention efforts, particular pollutants, geographic
areas and/or sources on the basis of their risk reduction potential, among
other factors. Targeted pollutants will include substances of concern as
-------
identified in Lakewide Management Plans (LaMPs)1 and in the Great Lakes
Water Quality Initiative (GLWQI)2 as well as many of the toxic substances
identified in EPA's nationwide 33/50 Program (formerly called the Industrial
Toxics Project).3 Pollution prevention efforts will also be targeted in select
geographic areas including Northwest Indiana, the Niagara River, and Milwau-
kee, Wisconsin in order to concentrate a critical mass of resources to achieve
demonstrable environmental benefit.
Set interim goals, on the way to virtual elimination, for the reduction in
releases of targeted toxic substances and measure progress. Specific
pollution prevention goals for persistent toxics will be developed as part of the
LaMP processes. In addition, consistent with the goals of the 33/50 Program,
this effort will focus on achieving 33 percent aggregate reduction of releases into
all media of the 17 targeted 33/50 Program contaminants by the end of 1992,
with 50 percent aggregate reduction by the end of 1995. These reductions will
be measured using the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), with 1988 as a baseline
year.
Focus governmental institutions and programs, and private sector efforts;
on meeting these goals. This plan details several ways in which this focus will
be achieved.
Continue to integrate pollution prevention into existing regulatory and non-
regulatory efforts. Pollution prevention is being integrated into efforts such as
1 Lakewide Management Plans (LaMPs) are multi-media plans being designed to restore beneficial
uses in ike open waters of the Great Lakes by reducing loadings of critical pollutants, such as persistent
toxic substances, into the Lakes. The development and implementation of a LaMP for each lake is
required under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended. EPA is currently developing
LaMPs/or Lakes Michigan and Ontario. LaMP development for Lakes Erie, Huron, and Superior will
follow.
2 The Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative (GLWQI) is an effort by EPA, the Great Lakes States,
and Indian tribes to establish uniform water quality criteria and related guidance for the Great Lakes
Basin.
3 The 33150 Program (formerly called the Industrial Toxics Project) is an important element of
the national EPA Pollution Prevention Strategy. Through this project, EPA has targeted specific
chemicals that are reported and tracked in the Toxic Release Inventory and will seek voluntary
reductions from the major industrial emitters.
-------
the GLWQI, LaMPs, Remedial Action Plans4, enforcement actions, and the
permitting process.
Ensure effective stakeholder involvement in all facets of this effort. This will
be done through technology transfer workshops, demonstration projects and
public outreach efforts. Stakeholders for Great Lakes pollution prevention
efforts include industry, agriculture, Federal, State, tribal, and local governments,
public interest groups, and individual consumers.
Success with each of these elements is critical to achieve the objective of reducing
and/or eliminating discharges of toxic substances into the Great Lakes.
TARGET POLLUTANTS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND SOURCES
As noted earlier, EPA believes that pollution prevention must be central to the
Agency's environmental mission. For this reason, one of the primary objectives of the
national Pollution Prevention Strategy is to incorporate fundamental pollution
prevention concepts into the broad array of Agency environmental activities. At th>
same time, EPA believes it is important to establish specific objectives and time frames
to demonstrate success in critical areas. This plan details several targeted efforts for
the Great Lakes Basin. Specific pollutants, sectors, geographic areas and sources have
been targeted. ...
Nationally, EPA has selected, through its 33/50 Program, 17 high priority pollutants as
the focus of EPA's efforts for this voluntary pollution prevention initiative;-' Hiese
chemicals were selected according to two basic criteria: risk to human health and the
environment, taking into account health and environmental effects data, potential for
total exposure over time as well as potential for exposures to multiple toxic substances,
and opportunity for prevention. In 1991, EPA will focus initial toxic reduction efforts
in the Great Lakes on the 17 chemicals identified under the 33/50 Program.
Regionally, specific pollutants and specific pollutant sources will be targeted for
pollution prevention efforts in each Lake through the LaMP process. Urilike the 33/50
Program which focuses on industrial generators, all sources of preventable pollution
4 Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) specify how contamination in specific Areas of Concern will be
remediated or cleaned up. Pollution prevention will protect current investment in cleanup activities by
ensuring that future releases of pollutants will not recontaminate an area. Whereas EPA has lead
responsibility for the development of LaMPs, states have the lead responsibility for the development and
implementation of RAPs.
-------
will be examined. For each LaMP, the impact of agricultural and urban non-point
sources, industrial sources and municipal sources will be evaluated, From the
evaluations, the LaMPs will establish load reduction strategies for each Lake.
Both the Lake Michigan and Lake Ontario LaMPs have already targeted specific
pollutants for priority attention and consider persistent toxic substances candidates for
pollution prevention efforts.
In addition, EPA is using the Lake Michigan LaMP to target - for pollution prevention
efforts - substances that are currently discharged, but are not yet documented as
impairing beneficial uses, Specifically:
By June 1991, EPA through the Lake Michigan LaMP process, will
develop, for public review and comment, a draft list of candidate critical
pollutants of concern specifically for Lake Michigan, containing
information on their sources and making suggestions for pollution preven-
tion activities (including recommendations for fast track actions). These
activities will be closely coordinated with ongoing pollution prevention
activities in the Great Lakes Basin.
By September 1991, EPA will develop the final list of these pollutants
and suggestions for appropriate pollution prevention activities (including
recommended fast track actions) to address these pollutants.
In addition to targeting by pollutants and source, several geographically focussed
initiatives are underway for pollution prevention such as the Agency's efforts in
Northwest Indiana and in the Niagara area. EPA. will also support the local initiative
underway in Milwaukee. These are described in more detail elsewhere in this Plan.
SET REDUCTION GOALS AND MEASURE PROGRESS
EPA believes that it is important to set performance goals in order to focus effort and
measure progress. Since it is important to have specific goals, the Great Lakes
pollution prevention effort will be guided by lake-specific, multi-media reduction goals
set through the LaMPs and the national 33/50 Program goals.
The LaMPs will establish goals for reducing generation of specifically targeted
pollutants. Pollution prevention goals in the LaMPs will target loadings from all
sources of pollution, including non-point, non-industrial sources that represent an
important part of the overall pollution problem for each of the Lakes.
-------
As noted earlier, the 33/50 Program establishes two goals: first, 33 percent reduction
of TRI releases of targeted contaminants by the end of 1992; with 50 percent reduction
by the end of 1995. These goals are aggregate goals and are not intended to apply to
individual facilities, which may achieve reductions either above or below the aggregate
goals.
EPA will take the lead in working to improve the ability to measure pollution
prevention success. Unlike the overall environmental protection strategy for the Great
Lakes Basin which measures success in terms of concentrations of pollutants in fish
and wildlife, reductions in overall pollutant loadings into the Lakes, and protec-
tion/restoration of critical habitats, this Pollution Prevention Action Plan is tightly
focused on reducing the on-going releases of pollutants. Thus its primary and most
direct measure of success is tied to reductions in the amount of pollutants released into
any media. EPA will track progress toward the pollution prevention goals using the
TRI data base as the initial benchmark against which to measure reductions, while also
working to establish environmental indicators to measure progress in restoring the
overall health and well-being of the Great Lakes ecosystem. Specifically, EPA will:
Measure Reductions ,.-;'«'' " . "--
Use TRI, with 1988 data as a baseline year, as a benchmark against which to
measure reductions in releases. Under the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990
generators are required, as part of the TRI report, to provide information
regarding toxic chemical source reduction and recycling.
Explore using other information sources as interim indicators of progress.
Establish Environmental Indicators
Develop ecosystem objectives for Lake Michigan by September 1991.
Ecosystem objectives for Lake Ontario were proposed in May 1990 and are
pending approval by Environment Canada, EPA, New York, and Ontario. Draft
Lake Ontario ecosystem indicators will be ready for public comment by
September 1991.
Continue annual collection and analysis of persistent toxic substances in fish
from each of the Great Lakes. Sampling will be completed by September 1991.
Conduct exploratory toxicant monitoring by September 1991 in Lakes Michigan
and Ontario to obtain preliminary estimates of toxic substances in the water
column.
-------
Identify what data will be needed to assess ecosystem responses to reductions
in pollution levels; these data will be collected as part of a revised and integrated
Great Lakes long-term monitoring program by September 1991.
FOCUS INSTITUTIONS: THE GREAT LAKES POLLUTION
PREVENTION CHALLENGE
This Action Plan will focus governmental institutions and programs and private sector
efforts on achieving these reduction goals. In addition to a cleaner environment,
cleaner production is being recognized as the key to international competitive
advantage. It is important that industries in the Great Lakes Basin are seen as leaders
in the field of clean production, for the benefit of both the Great Lakes environment
and the region's economic base. Participating in the Great Lakes Pollution Prevention
Challenge is one way of establishing that leadership.
The Great Lakes States, in cooperation with EPA, will issue the Great Lakes Pollution
Prevention Challenge to all sectors of society through outreach activities, such as
mailings, newsletters, and briefings. The States and EPA will challenge these sectors
to use prevention techniques to achieve reductions in generation of toxics; to develop
new technologies, tools and techniques to prevent pollution; and to begin to establish
informatio» and supplier networks necessary to make pollution prevention widespread.
Specifically to launch this effort, the States and EPA will challenge:
industrial generators in the Great Lakes Basin to incorporate pollution
prevention as the preferred strategy for meeting environmental goals;
agricultural generators to incorporate pollution prevention into fanning
practices (e.g., organizing collection programs for unwanted/canceled
pesticides);
colleges and universities in the region to incorporate pollution prevention
into their engineering, business, and related curricula;
Federal and State governments to promote incorporation of pollution
prevention concepts into environmental decision-making;
cities, counties and towns to develop programs that facilitate pollution
prevention choices for the community (e.g. prevent toxic contamination
of urban stormwater, and/or promote energy conservation);
-------
environmental groups to promote pollution prevention to their member-
ships and through their activities; and,
individual consumers to incorporate pollution prevention into their day-to-
day decisions, including, but certainly not limited to, minimizing use of
household toxic substances and generation of household hazardous waste.
In July 1991, EPA and the States will conduct outreach to encourage participation in
the Challenge. The States will develop a regional award program for the Great Lakes
Pollution Prevention Challenge, modeled after the Baldridge award for quality. Like
the Baldridge award, this award program will have tightly-defined criteria and will be
designed in conjunction with industry and research organizations. The most innovative
and/or successful projects will be selected for Great Lakes Pollution Prevention
Challenge Awards. At the time that the Challenge Awards are announced, there will
also be public recognition of all businesses, farms, communities, universities,
environmental groups and individuals that have come forward and agreed to meet the
Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Challenge.
As part of this Challenge, the States and EPA will convene a working group to
examine incentives and disincentives to pollution prevention, especially in the legal and
regulatory systems. This working group will include participation from industry,
communities, and environmental groups, at a minimum. The working group will
evaluate the extent to which increased regulatory flexibility can help to promote
prevention. Such an evaluation would include, but not be limited to, incentives for
experimental processes and technologies, and incentives to go beyond environmental
regulatory requirements.
In addition, this Challenge will provide the framework for the four major new
EPA/State initiatives (Automobile Industry, Lake Superior, Urban Non-Point Source
Pollution, and the International Pollution Prevention Symposium), as well as other
initiatives that will be developed in the future.
WEAVE PREVENTION INTO THE FABRIC OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROGRAMS
It is important to fully integrate pollution prevention into all environmental programs
so that reductions in one media are not offset by increases in others. Pollution
prevention activities have been included in environmental programs for many years.
Now, however, the increasing emphasis on pollution prevention as the cornerstone of
8
-------
environmental protection efforts is driving environmental program managers to reassess
their programs to ensure that pollution prevention is an integral part of all efforts. A
key component of this Action Plan is ensuring that the countless opportunities to
promote pollution prevention are being fully utilized throughout EPA and State
programs. Specifically, in 1991:
The States and EPA will continue to place a high priority on the Great Lakes
Water Quality Initiative in order to establish consistent Great Lakes States Water
Quality standards and implementation procedures. Compliance with such
standards will provide an opportunity to adopt prevention technologies.
The timeline for the GLWQI, as established in the Great Lakes Critical Programs
Act of 1990, is as follows:
by June 30, 1992, EPA will publish final water quality guidance
for the Great Lakes system in the Federal Register; and
within two years after the final guidance is published, the Great
Lakes States will adopt water quality standards, anti-degradation
policies, and implementation procedures within the Great Lakes
system which are consistent with that guidance.
9 EPA recognizes that training is needed to help institutionalize prevention as the
strategy of choice in all environmental decision-making and protection activities.
EPA is developing specialized courses designed for government employees and
industry. In addition, EPA will develop pollution prevention training for its
permit writers, using a cross-media, ecosystem focus. This training will consider
cross-media impacts and options for promoting pollution prevention in the EPA
permitting process.
EPA will incorporate pollution prevention into stepped-up enforcement efforts
for the Northwest Indiana area, the Niagara River, and other areas throughout
the Great Lakes Basin, as appropriate. In Northwest Indiana, for example, EPA
is actively negotiating to incorporate pollution prevention commitments into
consent agreements. In the Niagara River, all industrial sources of toxic
substances will be closely examined to ensure that pollution prevention is
considered for implementation and incorporation into enforcement actions.
* EPA and the States will incorporate pollution prevention, as appropriate, into the
Remedial Action Plans (RAPs) for Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes.
Pollution prevention activities will ensure that a remediated area will not become
-------
recontaminated by on-going pollution generation. EPA and the States will
provide pollution prevention training for Regional RAP coordinators and RAP
stakeholders.
EPA, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, will promote pollution
prevention in the agricultural sector in order to reduce non-point source loadings
into the Great Lakes. Programs to promote conservation tillage and to assess
overall farm practices are already in operation and will be enhanced. In
addition, EPA is producing technical assistance materials for farmers to help
them reduce surface and groundwater contamination from agricultural practices.
These materials will stress that good environmental practices also make good
economic sense. Some of these materials are currently available, while others
will be released during the year. This project will be completed by September
1992.
EPA will work with local governments to incorporate pollution prevention into
their programs and responsibilities in two different ways.
First, EPA will work with Rochester, Minnesota to pilot a household battery"
recycling project. Batteries are a source of air toxic emissions if incinerated
with the general municipal solid waste stream. Community outreach and educa-
tion material will be prepared. EPA and the community will prepare a "lessons
learned" report to summarize program implementation and results, particularly
the procedures to establish the recycling program, and the environmental and
economic benefits that are realized.
Second, EPA and Wisconsin will support the Greater Milwaukee Area Toxic
Minimization Task force in its effort to develop and implement an overall
strategy to promote pollution prevention in the region, including programs for
education and outreach. This task force is composed of members of city
government, industry, universities, business, environmental groups, and the local
sewerage district.
EPA will support Wisconsin's effort to develop a statewide pollution prevention
strategy and integrate pollution prevention into all environmental quality
programs. The strategy will focus on specific actions that individuals and
industries across the state can take to improve waste management. It will foster
technology transfer, innovative approaches and financial assistance for waste
reduction particularly among small and medium-sized businesses. Primary
emphasis will be directed at facilities that generate toxic pollutants, use tox-
ic/hazardous substances and/or generate hazardous waste. The program will
10
-------
promote pollution prevention as the best way of complying with new toxic air
and water quality regulations.
In order to involve labor and management fully in cooperative pollution
prevention activities within industry's environmental programs, EPA will support
the work of the Great Lakes Strategy Board (convened by the Council of Great
Lakes Governors) which is charged with identifying and reporting on the "best
labor/management practices" that foster pollution prevention.
To promote adoption of pollution prevention practices by industry, agriculture,
and the public, EPA and the Great Lakes States will sponsor over 25 technology
transfer conferences or workshops this year. In addition, EPA and the States
will disseminate pollution prevention information through activities such as
EPA's Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse, an electronic database.
EPA has initiated the Pulp and Paper Regulatory Ouster. Hie purpose of this
cluster is to develop an integrated regulatory framework in which all relevant
regulations affecting the pulp and paper industry, such as revised effluent guide-
lines and Gean Air Act regulations, are considered together to ensure maximum-
policy consistency and optimal environmental results. In addition to examining
regulations in an integrated fashion, the purpose of the cluster is to raise cross-
media issues and to consider pollution prevention and other non-traditional
approaches to environmental management.
EPA is launching four major new initiatives with the Great Lakes States. These
initiatives were chosen because, together, they address the broad spectrum of
pollution prevention opportunities available in the Basin.
First, in a public/private initiative, EPA and the States will work in conjunction
with Chrysler, Ford and General Motors to promote voluntary pollution
prevention of persistent toxics that negatively impact the Great Lakes in a
significant way. These automobile companies recognize the importance of
protecting the Great Lakes ecosystem and acknowledge the goal of reducing
discharges of persistent toxics that significantly impact the Great Lakes.
These automobile companies will participate with EPA, the States, and
other appropriate parties in a basin-wide effort to determine which
persistent toxics are of greatest concern to the Great Lakes ecosystem.
Once priority persistent toxics have been identified, these companies will
evaluate which of those materials are in use in their operations.
11
-------
These automobile companies will identify their past efforts to reduce the
use and generation of these toxics; establish priorities among the materials
of concern for additional in-house pollution prevention efforts; .and work
with their suppliers to promote pollution prevention efforts for persistent
toxics.
Further, these companies will participate in technology transfer forums to
share non-proprietary information on pollution prevention techniques and
success stories; and participate in similar forums to share information
about their efforts to establish pollution prevention thinking and actions
within their companies.
In addition, these automobile companies commit to continue exploring
new pollution prevention opportunities within their facilities for waste
streams of concern to their companies.
As the second major initiative, EPA, in partnership with Minnesota, Wisconsin,
and Michigan, will work cooperatively on pollution prevention efforts on Lake
Superior. Lake Superior has not experienced the intensive development^
urbanization and pollution characteristic of the lower Lakes and has remained
relatively pristine. It is the head of the Great Lakes System and does not receive
pollution from the other Lakes.
Although it is the largest of the Great Lakes, Lake Superior is also the most
vulnerable to pollution from toxic substances, since toxics tend to remain longer
in Lake Superior and once degradation does occur, it takes a longer time for the
Lake to recover.
The U.S. believes that focusing attention on the Lake Superior Basin will build
upon the considerable interest within the Great Lakes community for cleaning
up Areas of Concern and protecting the rest of this valuable resource from
degradation. Public interest also supports the International Joint Commission's
call for strong measures designed to protect the Lake. In support of the
initiatives, EPA and the Lake Superior States are committed to:
Reducing the quantity of persistent toxic substances entering the Lake by
building upon and accelerating existing environmental protection
programs such as RAPs within the Lake Superior Basin; and preserving
the high quality waters of the Lake by developing and reaching agreement
on common anti-degradation procedures and programs with the Great
Lakes jurisdictions.
12
-------
Developing an inventory of basin wide impairments and a consensus on
Lake Superior "critical11 pollutants using a consultative process involving
stakeholders.
Establishing an improved international air toxic monitoring network in the
Lake Superior Basin and conducting modeling to identify major local and
distant source areas impacting the Lake. This is needed because Lake
Superior is particularly vulnerable to atmospheric deposition of toxic
substances due to its large surface area and slow rate of sedimentation.
The monitoring network and modeling will enable the U.S. and the Great
Lakes jurisdictions to identify the pathways and sources of persistent toxic
substances entering Lake Superior and to design pollution prevention
techniques for their elimination. In addition, this information will support
development of the Lakewide Management Plan.
Reviewing and strengthen existing environmental criteria for water and air
programs and their implementation to ensure that they are adequate to
protect the Lake.
Supporting Minnesota's and Wisconsin's efforts in working with the St.
Louis River RAP citizen committees and private sector in developing a
multi-media pollution prevention approach to eliminate or reduce major
sources of discharge to the western end of Lake Superior.
Supporting Minnesota's Lake Superior Project which will consist of a
multi-media inspection/compliance initiative with an emphasis on
pollution prevention. This project is geographically focused within the
Lake Superior basin and includes the service area of the Western Lake
Superior Sanitary District, home to most of the major industries in
Minnesota's portion of the Lake Superior basin.
As the third major initiative, EPA and New York will launch pilot programs in
pollution prevention for urban non-point sources. In order to focus on the
prevention of urban non-point source discharges in the small quantity generator
and household hazardous waste areas, EPA will support New York's efforts to
conduct three pollution prevention projects. Specifically:
New York will conduct an intensive consumer education campaign on
household hazardous waste use, disposal and reduction in conjunction
with county and municipal governments (Monroe County/Rochester, Erie
13
-------
County/Buffalo, Niagara County/Niagara Falls and Jefferson Coun-
ty/Watertown).
In addition, within these communities fact sheets will be developed to
inform the public of the potential dangers of lawn chemicals and to assist
them in making responsible lawn maintenance choices.
New York will also work with smaller towns in these counties to help
identify non-point pollution sources. New York will develop guidance
documents to help local officials discern the origin of non-point source
discharges as well as to outline potential local courses of action which
may be implemented in order to ensure the reduction of such discharges.
As the fourth major initiative, EPA and Environment Canada will co-sponsor an
International Pollution Prevention Symposium in conjunction with the Interna-
tional Joint Commission meeting in the fall of 1991 to highlight the advances
made in pollution prevention under this Action Plan and through Canadian
activities, and to establish the agenda for future pollution prevention efforts. -
ENSURE STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
EPA believes that a broad-based public commitment to pollution prevention is essential
to ensuring the long-term health of the Great Lakes ecosystem. To this end, EPA will
look to the Great Lakes stakeholders: States, tribes, regional organizations, industry,
trade associations, academia, environmental groups and interested citizens to 'spread
the word' and to enlist support for its initiatives. Specifically:
EPA will compile TRI information regarding releases of targeted toxic chemicals
by key industries into the Great Lakes Basin. This information will be available
to the public in September 1991.
EPA will work to enlist stakeholder support as part of on-going LaMP efforts.
By September 1991, EPA will convene the Lake Michigan Lakewide Advisory
Council, which will include government and public representatives; to provide
input into the development of the Lake Michigan LaMP. For Lake Ontario, the
existing planning process under the Lake Ontario Toxics Management Plan
actively solicits input from all stakeholders and keeps them informed of its
progress.
14
-------
EPA will support the Council of Great Lakes Governors in its efforts to enhance
the involvement in pollution prevention by all stakeholders, including State
agencies, environmental groups and the private sector. The Council will
coordinate with existing pollution prevention networks throughout the region to
disseminate information about the full range of pollution prevention initiatives,
from local public education campaigns to industry-specific technology transfer
efforts.
The International Pollution Prevention Symposium, discussed above, will present
an opportunity to share information regarding pollution prevention activities with
stakeholders in the Great Lakes Basin and to solicit input into ongoing and
future activities.
Finally, EPA, working with the States, will recognize the contributions of
participants of the Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Challenge at the September
1991 International Pollution Prevention Symposium.
CONCLUSION
Achieving environmental quality in an industrial society is an immense challenge and
the improvements in the quality of the Great Lakes over the last 20 years are a credit
to all citizens of the Basin. The time has come now to expand our focus to include
preventing pollution at the source. This Great Lakes Pollution Prevention Action Plan
outlines the "next steps" that EPA will be taking, in full cooperation and partnership
with the Great Lakes States, with industry and agriculture, and with all citizens of the
Basin, to create a better environment and to ensure the viability of long-term economic
development in the region. EPA is proud to launch this initiative and looks forward
to making these cooperative efforts of the Great Lakes Basin a model for the world on
how to achieve both the highest level of environmental protection and a prospering
economy.
15
------- |