TO:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C Z0460
530R85107
3EC I 3 885
:>r <= ic ; OF
SOLID WASTE <\NU t'.'c^GE
SUBJECT: RCRA/Superfund Hotline Status Report - October 1985
FROM: Carolyn Barley, Project Officer
Office of Solid Waste (382-2217)
Barbara Hostage, Project Officer
' ^J
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (382-2198)
See addressees
I. ACTIVITIES
A. The Hotline responded to 8,920 questions and requests for documents in
October.
B. Betty Jean Perkins and Alfred Ward have joined the Hotline as document
clerks. They will provide support for the Hotline information management
system and assist the RCRA Docket staff.
C. On October 3 and 4, Hotline staff attended the Science Advisory Board
meeting to review the Office of Waste Program Enforcement's draft
document "RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance
Document."
D. On October 8, Dexter Hinckley, Office of Solid Waste, briefed the Hotline
on the mining waste exclusion reinterpretation published in the October 2,
1985, Federal Register (50 FR 40292).
E. On October 9, Paul Desrosiers, Office of Research and Development, briefed
the Hotline on EPA's Dioxin Strategy.
F. On October 10, Denise Wright and Betty Jean Perkins of the Hotline met
with EPA librarian Brigid Rapp and Loretta Marzetti, Chief of the
Information Services Branch, to discuss options for reorganizing the
Hotline information management system.
G. On October 15, Mike Kalinoski, Office of Toxic Substances, briefed the
Hotline on tank testing methods for the underground storage tank program
and the status of EPA's tank testing survey.
H. On October 16, a representative of the Hazardous Site Control Division
briefed the Hotline on the Superfund Record of Decision (ROD) process.
I. On October 17, Bill Rusin met with Robert Root, Washington Information
Center, to discuss design of the Hotline information database using
the IBM PC/AT and dBase III.
-------
-2-
J. On October 18, Tony Baney, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, briefed the
Hotline on EPA's plans to regulate mixed wastes (e.g., mixtures of hazardous
waste and radioactive waste or PCBs).
K. On October 18, Matt Straus, Office of Solid Waste, met with Hotline staff to
discuss solid waste questions received by the Hotline on the January 4, 1985,
Federal Register (50 FR 614).
L. On October 22, Jim Jowett, Emergency Response Division, briefed the Hotline
on the Superfund Emergency Response Clean-Up Services Contract (ERCS).
M. On October 23, Denise Wright of the Hotline met with Anna Hackenbracht, Office
of Policy Planning & Evaluation, to discuss OSW guidance as a part of OSWER's
Directives System.
N. On October 29, Steve Smith, Superfund Policy Analysis Staff, briefed the
Hotline on the revised National Contingency Plan final rule which was signed
by the Administrator on October 10, 1985.
0. On October 30, Barry Korb, Office of Solid Waste & Emergency Response, briefed
the Hotline on Agency-wide activities regarding EPA's Dioxin Strategy.
P. On October 31, Gordon Davidson of the Hotline met with Barbara Hostage,
Joe Bahnick, and Anastasia Watson of the Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response concerning the Hotline's role in the new Chemical Emergency Prepared-
ness Program.
II. REGIONAL ACTIVITIES
Two Regional Superfund Hotline information service pilot projects are underway in
Regions II and IX. The purpose of these services is to address inquiries concerning
activities at specific Superfund sites. These information services will also serve as
the Regional contacts for EPA's new Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program. The
following is an update on these Regional services.
A. Region IX
o Peter Werner is the Region IX Hotline Information Specialist. The toll-free
number for this service is (800) 231-3075, and the hours are from 9a.m.-12p.m.
o The service is operated in association with Region IX1s Community Relations
program. Davis Bernstein is the EPA contact at (415) 974-8071.
o Peter is working with Region IX to develop a list of sites at which the
toll-free number will be disseminated. A limited distribution of the number
was determined to be the best way to utilize the resource and determine the
call load and type of questions. Peter is working closely with the Region
IX technical staff to learn about ongoing and planned activities at these
selected sites.
o Peter has assisted in Region IX1 s distribution effort for the Chemical Emergency
Preparedness Program guidance package. The toll-free number is included with
the package.
-------
-3-
o Peter attended seminars on "Reviewing Uncontrolled Site/Remedial Action Technologies,"
and a National Priorities List training program.
o On October 23, Peter visited the Alviso asbestos site in California which is listed
on the National Priorities List/and which is targeted by EPA for emergency response.
He handed out fact sheets on and discussed the Hotline information service.
B. Region II
o Josh Bloom is the Region II Hotline Information Specialist. The toll-free nunbers
for this service are: New York (800) 732-1223, New Jersey (800) 346-5009.
o The service is operated in conjunction with Region II's Office of External Affairs.
Margaret Randol is the EPA contact at (212) 264-4535.
o Region II has also adopted the limited sites approach to the service during the
initial phase of this pilot project. Josh is working with the Superfund technical
staff in developing a list of target sites.
o Josh has met with most of the Superfund technical staff to become familiar with
the numerous Region II sites.
o Josh is providing support in developing the distribution and outreach procedures
for the information service.
III. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES
A. RCRA
1. Mining Waste Exclusion Reinterpretation
Are wastes from secondary slag smelting operations presently excluded from regulation
by §261.4(b)(7), the mining waste exclusion?
EPA has never interpreted the RCRA mining waste exclusion to apply to any
secondary smelting wastes. See the attached June 19, 1984, letter from the
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response to Senator Long.
In fact, the Agency currently lists two wastes from secondary smelting operations
as hazardous wastes. See 40 CFR 261.32, Waste Nos. K069 (emission control
dust/sludge) and K100 (waste leaching solution from acid leaching of emission
control dust/sludge). Significantly, these listings, which were originally
promulgated as part of EPA's May 19, 1980, list of hazardous wastes, were
retained when EPA temporarily deleted other listings in response to the October
21, 1980, enactment of the RCRA mining waste exclusion. See the May 20, 1981,
Federal Register (46 FR 27473).
The reinterpretation of the mining waste exclusion which EPA proposed in the
October 2, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR 40292) would not affect the status of
wastes from secondary slag smelting operations. Wastes from secondary slag
smelting operations would remain subject to Subtitle C (if hazardous).
Source: Dexter Hinckley (202) 382-3388
-------
-4-
2. Loss of Interim Status ,
Owners or operators of land disposal facilities which have interim status prior to
November 8, 1984, will have their interim status terminated on November 8, 1985,
unless a Part B permit application is submitted prior to that date and the owners/
operators certify that the facilities are in compliance with all applicable ground-
water monitoring and financial responsibility requirements per §270.73(c), of the
July 15, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR 28753). The notice of implementation and
enforcement policy for this provision in the September 25, 1985, Federal Register
(50 FR 38946), states that to certify compliance a facility must be in "physical
compliance" with the Federal or State ground-water monitoring and financial responsi-
bility requirements. What is "physical compliance" for the Federal ground-water
monitoring requirements?
Owners or operators must certify "physical compliance" with applicable ground-water
monitoring requirements defined in 40 CFR Part 265, Subpart F (see Appendix A, 50
FR 38949). "Physical compliance" for purposes of certification under §3005(e) means
that unless the owner/operator meets the waiver requirements under §265.90, the
facility must have a ground-water monitoring system which meets all of the specifice
tions of §265.91. This system must be physically in place at the unit for which
certification is required and sampling and analysis under §265.92 must be underway.
Source: Jackie Tenuszak (202) 475-9328
3. Waste Minimization
Section 3002(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA), as amended, requires that a
generator sign a certification on the manifest (EPA form 8700-22) and on the biennial
report. The certification states that the generator "has a program in place to
reduce the volume or quantity and toxicity of such waste to the degree determined by
the generator to be economically practicable." If a generator of hazardous waste
reclaims and reuses some of the hazardous waste on-site and sends the rest off-site
for recycling, can the generator certify that a waste minimization program is in
place since the volume of hazardous waste actually disposed of has been minimized?
The waste minimization provision of SWDA §3002(b) is a self-implementing program
in which the choice of compliance mechanisms is to be made by the generator in light
of his/her own particular circumstances. The waste minimization requirement is met
for the purpose of certification when the generator makes a good faith effort to
minimize threats to human health and the environment. EPA has determined that
various management practices conducted by a generator can be viewed as forms of
waste minimization, e.g., participation in a waste exchange, recycling of solvents,
and that these practices are consistent with the Congressional intent of the require
ment (see Senate Report No. 284, 98th Congress, 1st Session 66 (1983)). These
activities reduce the volume of waste disposed of by the individual generator and
also minimize the overall quantity of hazardous waste disposed of by allowing
continual reuse of hazardous substances. Therefore, in the case described above,
the generator may sign the certification on the manifest since the generator has
a waste minimization program in place.
Source: Elaine Eby (202) 382-7930
4. Permit Modification
An owner/operator has a RCRA permit to store hazardous waste in containers and tanks.
The owner/operator also generates hazardous waste on-site. The owner/operator intends
to construct an additional storage area for the purposes of storing hazardous wastes
-------
-5-
for 90 days or less. Wbuld the construction of this new storage area be considered
an action that would require modification to the facility's RCRA permit (§270.41 or
§270.42)?
Construction of the 90-day storage area would not require modification of the
facility's storage permit. A generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site
for 90 days or less without a permit or interim status provided that all §262.34
requirements are met. The 90-day storage area provision only applies to hazardous
waste generated on-site.
In order to avoid potential confusion regarding construction, modification, and
permitting, the following suggestions are recommended:
(a) the owner/operator should contact in writing the appropriate U.S. EPA
Regional office or State office, if authorized, and inform both the Director
and the appropriate enforcement personnel regarding the construction of the
90-day storage area and the owner/operator's intent to comply with §262.34
requirements in that area; and
(b) post a sign or notice in a visible place to identify the 90-day storage
area to distinguish it fron the permitted container area and storage tanks.
Source: Nancy Pcmerleau (202) 382-4500
5. Personnel Training During Post-Closure
The owner/operator of an interim status surface impoundment is completing closure.
All standing hazardous waste liquids have been removed; however, some hazardous
waste residues and contaninants will remain in place. Therefore, the owner/operator,
per §265.228(c), will provide post-closure care as for a landfill. There will be no
active management of hazardous waste or hazardous waste leachate during the post-
closure period. In the post-closure permit application which the owner/operator
must submit, is he required to meet the "personnel training" requirement listed
in §264.16?
The owner/operator of an interim status surface impoundment must address
all the information requirements in §270.14 and §270.17. If the post-
closure permit application does not include the information covering training
programs as required by §270.14(b)(12), the owner/operator must include a
justification for not meeting this requirement.
The personnel training requirement of §264.16 is designed primarily to ensure
the facility's compliance with the requirements of Part 264. If the owner/
operator of the closed surface impoundment is no longer actively managing
hazardous waste, then personnel training may not be required during the post-
closure operating period. Post-closure permit guidance, being prepared by
the Permits and State Programs Division of the Office of Solid Waste, will
address technical and administrative requirements for the post-closure care
period. The permit writer continues to have authority to ask for more infor-
mation from the owner/operator as the situation may require.
Source: Lillian Bagus (202) 382-4691
-------
-6-
6. Ground-Water Monitoring Well Construction
A bladder pimp is used instead of a bailer to obtain ground-water samples. What
construction material is required for the bladder punp and the sample tubing in the
well?
When a bladder punp is used, it is connected to a sample tube that runs inside
the well casing to the surface. The RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Technical
Enforcement Guidance Docunent (Draft) (Sections 3.2.1 & 3.6) dated August 1, 1985,
recommends that the well casing, bladder pump, and sample tube be made of Teflon or
316 stainless steel. In the case where an existing well is constructed of different
materials, this guidance document recommends that the enforcement official decide
if the well allows for the collection of representative ground-water samples as it
is built or whether another well should be built with more inert, resistant
materials (Section 3.7) adjacent to it.
Source: Ken Jennings (202) 475-9328
7. Changes During Interim Status
A hazardous waste storage facility operating under RCRA interim status standards (40 CFR
265) undergoes a corporate reorganization in which the original company becomes a parent
holding company with five subsidiaries. There is no change in ownership or operation of
the facility. In effect, the company changes in name only. Must the owner/operator
notify the U.S. EPA of the change? If so, what procedures should the owner/operator
follow?
40 CFR 270.72 and 270.10 address the changes during interim status which require
the submission of a revised Part A permit application. Because name changes are
not included under these sections, the facility would not need to submit a revised
Part A in this situation. Rather, the facility should'notify the Administrator or
Director .of the clerical change in the permit application using any reasonable
method. For example, the owner/operator could send a letter to the Regional
Administrator to make the appropriate correction on the Part A application. Note
that if the owner/operator name change involves a facility located in a State that
has interim or final authorization to manage the hazardous waste program in lieu of
the Federal RCRA program, the owner/operator should contact the State on this issue,
The State program authorized by U.S. EPA may include additional requirements that
are stricter or broader than those of the Federal program (e.g., the State may
require submission of a revised Part A application).
Source: Carrie Wehling (202) 475-8070
8. 9nall Quantity Generators, 100-1000 kg/month generators, and the Manifest
A small quantity generator (SQG) of less than 100 kg/month sends the waste to a
facility which is registered by the State to manage (store) solid wastes. This
State-registered storage facility accepts wastes from other small quantity
generators of less than 100 kg/month and after collecting enough waste for a bulk
shipment (over 1000 kg), sends it to a facility for disposal.
-------
-7-
(a) Is manifesting required at all in this scenario? If so, at what point?
(b) Must the final disposal site be a RCRA permitted disposal facility?
(c) If the small quantity generators generated between 100-1000 kg/month, how would
the scenario be affected?
(a) No manifesting is required in this scenario. The hazardous waste itself
is excluded from regulation under Parts 262 to 265, 270, and 124, so that
manifesting is not required of any party who stores, treats, or disposes of
the waste.
(b) The final disposal site need not be a RCRA permitted disposal facility.
Section 261.5(g)(3) allows SQGs to send their waste to a facility which is
registered by the State to manage solid wastes and still remain exempt from
full regulation.
(c) If the waste was generated by 100-1000 kg/month generators, manifesting would
be required to the State-registered solid waste storage facility as well as to
the State-registered disposal facility. In addition, until March 31, 1986, the
waste may be disposed of in a State-registered disposal facility. After March 3.
1986, the final disposal site must be a RCRA permitted (or interim status)
facility. *"'"'
Source: Barry Stoll (202) 382-4761
B. CERCLA
CERCLA 103(c) Notification
1. In 1985, buried druns containing a CERCLA hazardous substance are discovered at a
non-RCRA facility. Is the property owner required by CERCLA to notify EPA or the
National Response Center (NRC)?
The property owner must notify either EPA or the NRC depending upon the type of
substance buried. If the buried CERCLA substances are hazardous waste, then
discovery triggers notification obligations under Section 103(c) of CERCLA.
Section 103(c) requires that any person who owns or operates a facility not
regulated under RCRA interim status or a permit at which hazardous substances,
as defined in Section 101(14)(C) of CERCLA (i.e., RCRA wastes) are or have been
stored, treated or disposed of, notify EPA. This requirement applies to all such
facilities, regardless of the time at which the waste was placed in the ground.
In addition, the dumping or disposal of any hazardous substance consitutes a
"release" as defined in Section 101(22) of CERCLA. If the quantity of substance
thus disposed is equal to or greater than the appropriate reportable quantity
established in 40 CFR 302.4, and was not disposed in a RCRA facility, then the
release would be subject to the notification requirements of Section 103(a) and
103(b) of CERCLA. In that situation, the property owner, as the person in charge
of the facility, must notify the NRC upon discovery of the release.
Source: Carrie Vtehling (202) 475-8070
-------
r
-8-
Superfund Money and Federal Facilities
2. Section 300.66 of the final National Contingency Plan (NCP) allows Federal facilities
to be included on the National Priorities List (NPL). Generally, inclusion on the
NPL makes sites eligible for fund-financed remedial action. Is this true for
Federal facilities which are listed?
No; Section lll(e)(3) of CERCLA prevents the Agency from taking fund-financed
remedial action at Federal facilities. Section lll(e)(3) does clarify, however,
that certain other expenditures may be made at Federal facilities.
Contact: Steve Smith (202) 382-2200
-------
-9-
IV. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS
The Hotline responded to 8920 questions and requests for documents in October. Of the
questions asked, the percentage of callers was:
Generators
Transporters
TSDF's
EPA HQ's
EPA Regions
Federal Agencies
Local Agencies
23%
2%
14%
2%
4%
3%
1%
State Agencies
Consultants
Press
Trade Associations
Citizens
Others
7%
35%
1%
1%
3%
4%
More calls were received by Region 3 than from any other Region. Breakdown by Region:
16% 3 27% 5 19% 74% 97%
12%
11%
England0
Canada <1%
RCRA
7%
8
4%
10
3%
General Information
Notification (3010)
Definitions (260.10)
Petitions/Delisting (260.22)
Definitions (261.2 & 3)
Exclusions (261.4)
Small Quantity Generator (261.5)
Recycle/Reclaim (261.6)
Container Residues (261.7)
Waste ID (261 C&D)
262 Generator
Manifest Info
Pre- transport
Accumulation
Recordkeeping & Reporting
International Shipments
263 Transporter
270 B - Permit Application
D - Changes to Permits
F - Special Permits
G - Interim Status
271 State Programs
124 Decision Making
RCRA Amendments
Liability/Enforcement
Other /Referrals
Document Requests
368
122
138
114
171
85
286
318
68
787
27
131
21
121
64
21
54
82
33
21
68
111
1
1981
74
255
1083
TSDF
A-Scope/Applicability
196
B-General Facility Standards_
C-Preparedness Prevention
D-Contingency Plans
79
18
20
E-Man i fes t/Recordkeep ing/Repor t i ng 31
F-Groundwater Monitoring 193
G-Closure/Post-Closure 102
H-Finaneial Requirements 105
I -Containers 55
J-Tanks 98
K-Surface Impoundments_
L-Waste Piles
106
13
M-Land Treatment
N-Landfills
15
90
0-lncinerators
79
P-Thermal Treatment
12
Q-Chemical, Physical, Biological Treat. 71
R-Underground Injection 7
X-Miscellaneous Facility 1
Y-Exper imental 1
266/267
158
CERCLA General/Overview
117
Hazardous Substances/RQ
NCP
189
120
Taxes/IRS/PCLTF_
Removal
18
54
Remed ial/lSIPL
On-site policy_
Off-site Policy
163
25
24
ERRIS/Notification
29
-------
-10- ' •
RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE
800-424-9346
202-382-3000 (in Washington, D.C.)
V. PUBLICATIONS FOR OCTOBER
RCRA
, /" Copies of RCRA statute incorporating HSWA provisions, October 1985. The
-. i>"'' ^ Hotline will take requests.
I „ -, '
Vt "
]J ' Environmental Liability Jjisurance letters from Lee Thomas to Senator
Stafford and Representative Dingell, October 18, 1985. Estimates that
50 facilities will close due to failure to certify compliance with the
financial requirements under the loss of interim status provisions.
The Hotline will take requests.
"Publications of the National Toxicology Program," October 1985, available
from the National Toxicology Program (NTP) at (919) 541-3991. This is a
, list of bioassays. The bioassays are available from NTP, National Technical
l' Information Service (NTIS) at (703) 487-4650, or National Cancer Communications
at (301) 496-5583.
'i /
Letters concerning recycling and waste exchange activities as waste
minimization efforts, September 16, 1985. The Hotline will take
requests.
i "The Interim Prohibition Guidance for Design and Installation of Under-ground
Storage Tanks," draft, August 1985, is available from EPA Regional offices. ^
* ;,- -*.',>
!/ "L.U.S.T. LINE" (Leaking Underground Storage Tanks) newsletter (EPA/ 530-SW-85-020),
1" August 1985. The Hotline will take requests. Future issues are scheduled for
1 publication in December 1985, April 1986, and August 1986. ^ , / /
"Regulatory Program of the United States Government: April 1, 1985 - March 31,
1985," (S/N 041-001-00293-6), August 1985, available from the Government Printing
Office at (202) 783-3238.
• V k '
' %
"Toxicology Handbook," August 1985. The Hotline will take requests.
, • / *
'. ^ "Endangerment Assessment Handbook," August 1985. The Hotline will take requests.
i'
"Draft RCRA Preliminary Assessment/Site Investigation Guidance," August 5, 1985,
[! I available fran ORD in Cincinnati, Ohio, at FTS 684-7562 or (513) 569-7562.
i '
j "ORD Publications Announcement, January - April, 1985" (EPA/600/M-85/020)
May 1985, available from ORD in Cincinnati, Ohio, at FTS 684-7562 or
^ (513) 569-7562.
,\
. "Chlorinated Dioxins Workgroup Position Document - Interim Risk Assessment
Procedures for Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins and - Dibenzofurans (CDDs
<• and CDFs)," April 1985. The Hotline will take requests.
-------
-11-
RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE
800-424-9346
202-382-3000 (in Washington, D.C.)
CERCLA
"Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan," signed by the Administrator on October 10, 1985. Available locally
from the Superfund Docket at (202) 382-3046. The Hotline will take requests.
"Patterns and Trends for National Response Center Hazardous Releases - Calendar
Years 1983-1984 and January to March 1985 (Preliminary)," June 1985. Prepared
by U.S. DOT (Report Number DOT-TSC-EPA-S-1,) available by calling Jack Kooyoomjian
at (202) 382-4130 or Terry Eby at (202) 382-7734.
"Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial Action Guidance," February 1985. The
Hotline will take requests.
"Superfund: What It Is, How It Works," (HW-1), June 1985. Multiple copies are
available by calling the Public Information Center at (202) 829-3535.
-------
-12- '
VI. FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
Former Notices With Open Comment Periods As Of November 1;
September 10, 1985: 50 PR 36966
(proposal to amend spent pickle
liquor listing (K062))
September 18, 1985: 50 FR 37950
(proposed fourth update to the
NPL)
Other Federal Register Notices;
October 2, 1985: 50 FR 40292
(proposal to revise the mining
waste exclusion)
October 3, 1985: 50 FR 40412
(corrections to liability
insurance notice)
October 3, 1985: 50 FR 40377
(notice of final authorization
for Kansas)
October 4, 1985: 50 FR 40528
(notice of interim final
determination on revisions to
Texas' final authorization)
October 8, 1985: 50 FR 41125
(tentative decision to deny
rulemaking petition)
October 16, 1985: 50 FR 41952
(notice of availability of the
inventory of open dumps)
Proposed rule and request for comments
in order to resolve the scope of the listing
for spent pickle liquor from steel finishing
operations, K062, listed in §261.32. Comments
are due by November 12, 1985.
Proposed rule and request for comments on
EPA's proposed fourth update with 38 sites
to the National Priorities List (NPL).
Comments are due by November 18, 1985.
Proposal to narrow the scope of the mining
waste exclusion in 40 CFR Part 261.4(b)(7)
(the "Bevill Amendment"). This proposed
rule would relist six smelting wastes
previously listed and eliminate many wastes
from this exclusion except for specified
wastes. Comments are due by December 2, 1985.
Correction of a regulatory citation to the
August 21, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR
33902). The citation should have read
264.151U) instead of 265.151 (i).
Notice of final authorization for Kansas'
hazardous waste program subject to the
limitations on its authority imposed by HSWA.
Effective at 1:00 p.m. on October 17, 1985.
Notice of interim final determination on
revisions to Texas' final authorization.
These revisions were necessary due to the
transfer of authority from Texas Department
of Health to the Texas Water Commission.
Comments are due by November 18, 1985.
Tentative decision to deny the petition
requesting that the new dioxin listed wastes
be changed from acutely hazardous wastes (H)
to toxic wastes (T). Comments are due by
November 7, 1985.
Notice announcing the availability of the
latest edition of the "Inventory of Open
Dumps." This document is available from
Regional Offices or the State Programs Branch
(202-382-2210) at EPA Headquarters.
-------
-13-
RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE
October 18, 1985: 50 FR 42181
(notice of final authorization
for Nevada)
October 23, 1985: 50 FR 42936
(final rule listing six wastes
generated in DNT, TDA, and TDI
production).
October 29, 1985: 50 FR 44644
(EPA's semi-annual regulatory
agenda)
Notice of final determination for Nevada's
State hazardous waste program. This program
is subject to the limitations imposed by
HSWA. Effective at 10:00 a.m. November 1,
1985.
A final rule listing six new waste streams,
Kill to K116. These waste streams are
generated during the production of dinitro-
toluene (DNT), toluene diamine (TDA),
and toluene diisocyanate (TDI). Also included
in this listing are four commercial chemical
products listed in 261.33(f). Effective
date: April 23, 1986.
EPA's semi-annual regulatory agenda was
published. This agenda provides the
status of regulations under development,
revision, and review at the Agency.
-------
-14-
Martha Anderson, DORM
Frank Biros, WH-527
George Bonina, WH-563
Karen Brown, PM-220
John Bosky, EPA - Kansas City, KS
Diane Buxbaum, Region II
Eileen Claussen, WH-562
Pat Cohn, WH-527
Peter Cook, WH-527
Alan Corson, WH-565
Elizabeth Cotsworth, WH-563
Hans Crump, WH-548B
Truett DeGeare, WH-563
Steve Dorrler, EPA - Edison, NJ
Barbara Elkus, WH-527
Tim Fields, WH-548B
Elaine Fitzback, WH-527
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
George Garland, WH-562
John Gilbert, EPA - Cincinnati, OH
lantha Gilmore, WH-562
Peter Guerrero, WH-563
Penny Hansen, WH-562
Bill Hanson, WH-548E
Betti Harris, EPA-Region VII
William Hedeman, WH-556
Lee Herwig, A-104
Rick Horner, WH-548A
Hotline Staff
Phil Jalbert, WH-548D
Alvin K. Joe, Jr., Geo/Resource
Jim Jowett, WH-548B
Thad Juszczak, WH-562A
Robert Knox, WH-562
Jack Kooyoonjian, WH-548B
Mike Kosakowski, WH-527
Jerry Kotas, WH-527
Walter Kovalick, WH548
Donald Kraft, WH-548D
Tapio Kuusinen, PM-223
Robert Landers, EMSL/LV
Carol Lawson, A-107
John Lehman, WH-565
Steve Levy, WH-563
Henry Longest, WH-548
Gene Lucero, WH-527
James Makris, WH-548A
Susan Mann, WH-563
Jack McGraw, WH-562A
Tony Montrone, WH-527
Sue Moreland (ASTSWMO)
Sam Napolitano, PM-220
Dean Nelson, A-104
Christina Parker, WH-562
Karen Reed, PM-273
John Riley, WH-548B
Clem Rastatter, WH-563
Dale Ruhter, WH-565
William Sanjour, WH-563
Susan Sawtelle, WH-562
Pam Sbar, LE-134S
Mike Shannon, WH-563
Ken Shuster, WH-565
Elaine Stanley, WH-548
Jack Stanton, WH-527
Bruce Weddle, WH-563
Steve Wilhelnv, Region VTI
Marcia Williams, WH-562
Russ Wyer, WH-548E
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
-------
ATTACHMENT
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
"~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JUN 1 s 7.934
SOLID WASTI AMD t Ml oaf *C
------- |