'   530R86103
            AT E R
UALITY
                        MIREX
           Criteria and Standards  Division
        D^ffice  n f Water  Reulations  and  Standard
                      United  States
             EIn v i r an rue n t al  Protection  F^gency
                    MRRCH   1  9 8 G

-------
' t

-------
                                WATER QUALITY ADVISORY
                                        Number   8  .

                                           MIREX

                              Criteria and  Standards  Division
                         Office  of  Water Regulations  and Standards
                       United States  Environmental Protection Agency


               The  advisory concentration for Mirex in ambient water for the
          protection  of freshwater aquatic organisms is estimated to be 0.001
 ^:         ug/L.  No saltwater data were reviewed,  and  no advisory concentration
 v         for the protection of saltwater  aquatic  organisms  is estimated.  Care
          should be taken  in the application of this advisory, with considera-
          tion of its derivation,  as stated  in  the attached  support document.

              An advisory  concentration for the protection of aquatic life can
\,j         be derived from  several  sources:  a no observed effect  level  (NOEL),
          the lowest concentration which has been  observed to cause acute or
          chronic toxicity, or other experimental data which may  be applicable.
          When there is no  valid experimental data, a value may be derived from
          a model which uses structure-activity relationships  (SAR) as its
          basis.  The advisory concentrations should be used with  caution, since
          they may be derived from very limited experimental evidence, or in the
          case of SAR derived values,  no data on  the specific chemical.

             The advisory  concentration for Mirex in ambient water  for the
         protection of human health  is  estimated to  be  0.093 ug/L, based on
         data and evidence available to U.S. EPA.  Care should be  taken in the
         application of this advisory,  with consideration of its derivation, as
         stated in the  attached support document.

             An advisory concentration  for the protection of human health can
         be derived from a number  of sources: The Office of Drinking Water
         Health Effects Advisories;  Acceptable Daily Intake(ADI)  values from
         EPA; Office of Pesticides and  Toxic Substances  risk assessments;
         Carcinogen Assessment Group(CAG)  cancer risk estimates;   risk estimates
         derived from the  open literature;  or other sources which will be given
         in the support document.  The advisory concentrations derived from
         these sources will vary in  confidence and usefulness, based on the
         amount and quality of data  used as well  as  the assumptions behind the
         original estimates. The user is advised to  read  the background
         information carefully  to  determine  the strengths or deficiencies of
         the values given  in the advisory.
                             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                             Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
                             77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
                             Chicago, IL 60604-3590

-------
      HUMAN HEALTH AND AQUATIC LIFE
     LITERATURE SEARCH AND DATA BASE
              EVALUATION FOR
                  MIREX
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF WATER REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
     CRITERIA AND STANDARDS DIVISION
         WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 	     1
SCOPE OF SEARCH 	     3
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 	     3
     Aquatic Toxicity 	     3
     Health Effects 	    12
RECOMMENDATIONS 	    17
     Aquatic 	    17
     Health  	      19
REFERENCES 	    22


                            LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.  Summary of Aquatic Toxicity Literature
          Review of Mirex 	     4
Table 2.  Summary of Health Effects Literature
          Review of Mirex 	    13
Table 3.  Data Requirements Calcaulation of Aquatic Life
          Interim Criteria—Mirex 	    18
Table 4.  Data Requirements for Calculation of Human Health
          Interim Criteria—Mirex 	    21


                           LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Summary of Toxicity Data for Mirex 	     9

-------
                    HUMAN HEALTH AND AQUATIC  LIFE
                   LITERATURE SEARCH AND DATA BASE
                            EVALUATION FOR
                                MIREX
                 U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
              OFFICE OF WATER REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
                   CRITERIA AND STANDARDS DIVISION
                       WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20460
                             INTRODUCTION


    Mirex was first produced commercially by Allied Chemical Corpora-
tion in 1955 as Dechlorane for use as a fire retardant and registered
as an insecticide in 1959.   Hooker Chemical Corporation of Niagra
Falls, New York,  was the sole manufacturer until  1967 when other
companies including Hexagon Laboratories of New York and Nease
Chemical Company in State College, Pennsylvania,  and Salem, Ohio,
supplied the chemical to Hooker  (U.S.  EPA,  1981).  The use of mirex
was banned in 1976 and its registration cancelled in the United States
in December of 1977 because of its toxicity and very long half life in
the environment as well as  in  the body  (Grabowski, 1983).

    Insecticidal  use accounted for only 26 percent of the mirex pro-
duced by Hooker before 1977; the  other  74  percent  was Dechlorane
marketed as a flame retardant  (Francis and Metcalf, 1984).

    Dechlorane was used as a fire retardant for plastics,  rubber,
paint, paper, and electrical goods (Windholz,  1976).  Little informa-
tion is available  concerning the extent of its entry into the environ-
ment.   Because Dechlorane is fairly well immobilized in most end
products, it is likely that any environmental  contamination by
Dechlorane was associated with its manufacture, rather than the use or
disposal of  items  containing the  chemical  (U.S. EPA, 1981).

    Mirex was used to control western  harvester ants, yellow jackets,
and primarily the  imported fire ant,  Solenopsis saevissima richteri,
which infests millions of  acres  in the southeastern U.S.   The U.S.
Department of Agriculture sponsored federal-state  cooperative programs
from 1962 to 1975 to help control the pest.  Over 130 million acres
were treated with  an estimated 226,000 kg of mirex bait  (containing
0.3  to 0.6  percent active ingredient)  during that period (U.S. EPA,
1981) .

-------
    Mirex bait consisted of a combination of ground corncob grits,
soybean oil, and technical  grade  mirex  (0.075 percent) (Spencer,
1973).   Application was predominately through aerial spraying at  low
level  rates of  about 4.2 g/ha or  1.7 g/acre (Francis and  Metcalf,
1984) .

    Mirex is a stomach poison with little contact toxicity.  The  bait
owes its selective effect both to its delayed toxic action and to the
behavior in ants.  In scavenging the bait particles and returning them
to their mounds, the entire ant  colony becomes exposed to the
pesticide  (U.S. EPA, 1981).

    The indirect exposure of mirex to non-target organisms occurs
through absorption or ingestion  of mirex in water,  by direct ingestion
of mirex bait,  or by ingestion of other organisms exposed to mirex.
Model  ecosystem  studies indicate  that both bioconcentration and bio-
magnification occur (Frances and Metcalf, 1984).

    Mirex is a  fully-chlorinated,  cage-structured chemical with mole-
cular  formula C10C112.  It is a  white, crystalline,  odorless solid not
naturally found in the environment.   Physical and chemical properties
of the pure chemical are given below:
      Molecular Weight
      Melting Point
      Vapor Pressure
      Solubility in Water
        (at room temperature)
      Log Octanol:  Water Partition
        Coefficient
545.59
485 °C
6 x 106 mm Hg at 50 C
<1.0 ppm

6.89
    Mirex is an extremely stable compound,  resistent to photodegre-
dation and biodegredation.   It is unaffected by sulfuric,  nitric,  and
hydrochloric acids.   Mirex is not believed to be metabolized or
detoxified by biological systems.  Due to its extreme environmental
persistence and high lipophilicity, mirex has the potential to bio-
accumulate and has been shown to bioconcentrate several thousandfold
in food chains  (Doull  et al.,  1980).

    Decomposition of mirex occurs in the presence of sunlight or UV
with chemical catalysts.  Photodegredation products are mono- and
dihydro-derivatives, with the major products being chlordectone and 8-
monohydromirex  (photomirex).   Photomirex  is  not a commercial product,
but chlordectone was marketed as an insecticide until 1976 when severe
health and environmental effects were identified at its production
site in Hopewell, Virginia  (Francis and Metcalf,  1984).  Because of
its high melting point and  relatively low vapor pressure, mirex is not
readily transmitted by atmospheric routes.   Environmental contamina-
tion has occured directly through aerial deposition of mirex bait
particles and industrial discharge and indirectly through surface
runoff.

-------
    Significant discharges of mirex are known to have occurred from
the Hooker Plant at Niagra Falls.   The Niagra River,  which supplies
more than 84 percent of the tributary input to Lake Ontario,  is the
major contributor of mirex found in sediments, fish,  and  wildlife of
Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River (Whittle and Fitzsimons,
1983) .

                           SCOPE OF SEARCH

    Sources were identified through computerized literature searches
of the Toxicology Data  Base, TOXBACK, TOXLINE, and NTIS files and
manual review  of bibliographies.   Literature was focused primarily on
controlled, dose-response studies  conducted  from 1965 to the present
and dealing with human  health effects and aquatic toxicity.

    The quality assurance/quality control measures employed in the
studies were evaluated  specifically  on their use of positive and
negative controls, replication, and chemical analysis of test concen-
trations.   Information on bioaccumulation,  field observations, food
chain effects,  and sublethal effects also was extracted  from articles.

    Data from each literature source  were tabulated by biological
species,  medium of test exposure (water, fish, sediment,  food),
concentration observed  effects,  and data quality assurance specifica-
tions.   Based on these findings,  recommendations for appropriate
interim criteria for mirex for the  protection of human  health and
aquatic life were formulated when the data permitted.

    The available dose-response data were compared to the requirements
specified in the "Guidelines and Methodology Used in Preparation of
Health Assessment Chapters of the Consent Decree Water  Quality
Criteria Documents" (FR 45:79347, November 28, 1980)  and  the "Guide-
lines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the
Protection of Aquatic Life and Their Uses" (Stephan et al., 1985).


                         SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

                           Aquatic  Toxicity

    Although there have been many studies on the acute effects of
mirex to freshwater fish,  few of those studies have produced acute
LC50 values, i.e.  concentrations  lethal to 50 percent of  test
organisms (Table 1,  Figure 1).   Various species including rainbow
trout,  yellow perch, fathead minnow,  bluegill and walleye have shown
no adverse effects to mirex at concentrations up to 100 mg/L (96 hr
exposure)  (Johnson and Finley,  1980).  Fathead minnows  treated with
concentrations exceeding the maximum water solubility of mirex (<1
ppm)  showed no effects  in 96-hour studies  (Buckler et al., 1981).

-------



















-






X
ce
z
u.
O
-»
LU

i j i
ce
LiJ
ce
5

£
!j
^
^"
~
o
X
g

o

1

o
^H




t/5

^



5>
5













O)
u
c
Ol
fc.
Ol

Ol
ce







VI
3
* * o
F— Ol ij

Sg UJ

V




VI
c
0).°.
>i u T,
~§s
•— u *•
 •->
§•
S 52
L. c c u- 4J en «
O O — O 0) O -O
4-> Q U VI C 4-> Ol
UOVI^D fOl/l •*-£+*
•^ OJ 3 4J Ol Olk-lO £EOI
*-CO<0 3U~D w J-1 W-
OEVIOIO) — •<- O 1 1 1 1 1 ifc.ol'O
— O 0) ov > virvj i i i i i u
*-> t. I- O "O O) O •— 1 l«_ 4-> >>
10 U- S. Ol k 4J O> O <—
»— .» x *-*>» £1. *J O)

3 OIO £3. V>3OQ X£OI
u e • vi en 1/1 e L, ex o en >
U « CO -^ «• U3 •»-'^£X U-^'O
«t t (NJ M- n »3- 1— 4J *J O) O £ *O
c
CO *O
en w
^« ^~
^ O 0)
»i/ii i n "G i i i ^4-»u
*» -0 EX c «o 0)
-^o o o u ex
I- £ •— O. Q.4-1
3 4J 10 C £
ex oi u oi «— oi vi
Z -^ »— o u —
X C-0 L. C>»-
-HZ £ <0 *J O
P- 0 4J COO
en i/> o< o> o o
en < H- 3 cj ro m

i, «"en
k ro ^
L. i- us >, .-v.
^ 0) ^™ 0) 4«* ^ i-H Ol
OlfOOIfi •^'fOOX
XX XX o-5Sin J
X >,
£ -D U t S. 1. 1. -S
£ £ £ £ £

^H ^n ^n &* CT^ ^R VH


fQ)

,BK .^

U 4-> O» *J
X -*- -i 3
^ *d ^"g
>-C •— 10)
*j *j o C
•w- I/I »—
<• e t. <-» o ^L^ ^.^~^
x o o) o enen 010101
5L"S 4->EuCi/i — i S X £H S
SSI "SIS S A A A A A _^
* o— o ex u o o o o Q u
c x i. E u in ur> tninun --^
o o « £ ••- 3 u u u u u ce
* u E o— vi _ij _i_i_i Z

^v *^ -~. g
vi in i/i 5
" " ~ ~ 1 i
x! xl "i § 1 »
pexj ^o exl *> c vi t. c
•o £ « £ x -> E
I/I VI
5 1
i*. en
o t-
0
C 40
O> l/l
u 
0)
CX t-
o
o
in 4J
c
c oi
s_
u o. •*->
O) C
n_ O qj
i*. in E
Ol 3
L. U
en o o
c i«- -c
u c oi
3 O U
•o — i.
O 4J 3
k. 10 O
ex u in
4J
§c c
0) •»-
•*• 
-------


































o
UJ

Z
F-
z
o
u


«•— 1
UJ
m




























Ol
u
c
^
01
K-
O*
ee

•



VI

2 ^ tn
C * 4->
> 0 £
** C "8
*« 3 £
3 vi 5:
O v> u
< 01
I/I



Ml
ll
o -o
UJ
g
4-> -F-
V) 4J
Ol iO

5





g
a

g
o
g
a






0)
"3
v
*5?*

C iO Ol Ol
01
F- 4-> in m
IO Ol C U
co Zro "^
10 01 i^ o en 10 en
* F* Z U FH l/> .— 1
•O in
c c '
F- -F- F"t . O
in •— i/i in 4J • E >n n
OI-F-CF-U'O B.O C
3 JC Ot O F-  "O • CJ. E Oin
•2 ii ..1 3 £ "* "S S "«o m vo c Z*
in X F- o >» en *•- 10 o 10*0
oi 01 >o v  • u T- C-F-
4J Ol L JC X OJ Ol •*• 4J IO EOI
C *F" ^~ VI O C ^ F— l£- I4_ t *^ L
"" *« 4J a?"^ "S ° "* H °* O "O 4J r—
Oi4-*cc 011/101 in^ v oivi
i/> i- 01 TJ c m c oiCa. voi uir> u- t. L.
10 O E -F- -F- >>-F- 3-F- 34J CCVJO^-3
o>E4?j^in -a u oo EO
i. 10 in c u — o>i/> — oi o • o» £
o TJ i> T3 a> "O  vi 10 ^. Oi
•C JZ 4J t.
•• c «n co c a.
VI O -F- O TJ X
SQ.VI- •- u a> ai i/i
T3 4^ fc. e
4J F- 1 O *J 0) Ol EV) -F-
t) IA v> ^3 ^J ^3 4J
b. •• 0) «3 01 O 3
4J— j: 4J E ^ i- jc F-
C «• 4J in 3 4J o
Oi ••— "F- in m «F- o. Ol VI
u X -a c u- £
C *n CO X ^
U C u 0.4J 8 P 0
O 10 10 ^ en i/l 4-1
1 C 01
*J Ol O 4-1 W

•a c E J3 o E ^- ioja^.o>
4J « OICL-F-F* OIIO
»- o.^— -H z: -^ •«-« cn i- r-i < * E — • tax
in i .. _c m
>» — VI !•» >,
•o F- c >>n 01 in J- ie
T3 Q. O ^ CM -H J3 0 JT -O I.
S-F- ^^ ^ OlfU E 45

VO IOCUO1V0 •* OJ 00


x,§
O) -F-
4J 4J
« u
- 1!
«-. wo.
en *~* oi
* F- ^1
§ ?f_ 5

S F- k. IO
ec ae at o«CX3U
Z 9C Z UJ K ^ vf UJ

3
4->
IO
4-1
J= J= U
I/I I/I C
•F- f S IO «
^— 1. Mk f »^ Ff
*^ *»— B4 ^ ^^ •
4-> 4-> O IO O
10 « in 10 01 10
u u ^ Er* E
f W. 14-
V> F- F- 3 10 IO
•»• Ol 0>F- -F- W -F-
K- e e « c oi e
2 s st; *« *
0 -C J=— « X «
(9 O O *^ OP~^ O
»
r««
O «
?a
lOr-l OJ

C * t/i
O >, !_
m i? S
c F- -a FH
-c c c co
O -F. IO Ol
^ U. CO FH









i i i
i i i



•o "n
•F- e
m
I-5
4J ^_

I. F-
4-> E
 i/i >t in
O IO "O 4J -o
 c *•" 3 4-»
Ol U O OJ Q. Ol
c x -F- £ E

U O "F- I/) Ol OO
•o c -o < 01 <

1 TJ F-
•F- O> F-
4-> N Ol
in -F- x
§T3 C 1.
oj o ex oi
O 4V -F- O Ol 4->
0) 3 Ol CM ft) 10
OC 4J-OX "Of

i. i- L.  •—
Ol § IB
«J >
3 >I-F-
£1.
•O 3
F- F- •*«. ex. o> in
^ 	 01 4J
E f a ^ E O."
8S Q a. 4J e
O O l/l Ol
F-l F* 0 « 01 Ol
• • FH COS-* L.
o o oj
SO Q O Ol
US IA F- It- Ol
U U <_> < <4- C
UJ UJ UJ X OJ "F-
VI
3
F- VI
3 3
U VI
ii i~
X F- Ol
F- 3 — » >
3 F- IO I/It
Oi IB t. 3 10

^ O U O
•F- O) O CO)
c 
-------
 Ol
 u
 c:
 Ol
 1_
 Ol
n-
 Ol
                                       o>

                                       in
                                      C CO
                                      10 CTv
            .  in

              o
                                                                                                            c oo
                §TJ
                c
             U IO
                                         i_  vi w    «9-
                                     •—  CO  >, Ol     I
                                      10 JC  10 J->     I ,—
                                     •»-       "O
                                      >  I. O Ol
                                      3  o 4J .
                                     CO r-  or
                                                                                                               I  X
                                                                                                            I  O  Ol
                                                                                                           4J f-  L.
                                                                                                                  o
                                                                                                            U  I/I
                                                                                                               u  c
                                                                                                           M -^  O
                                                                                                                          C 1.
                                                                                                                          IB O
                                                                                                     > i— ro
                                                                                                     o-   t>»
                                                                                                     •o at en
                                                                                                       -
                                                                                01
                                                                                4-1 <

                                                                                5'
                                                                                                               Ol
                    .
               >> u  r
OQ
                 tfl f
                 o •o
                 Ol «
                 f- 1-
                                                                Ol
                                                               4J
                                                                ie
                                                                u


                                                               "ex
                                                                                                           3
                                                                                                           a.
                                     ex


                                     S

                                     en
                                     en
               
                                                                                     01 I.
                                                   »• oi
                                                   in r-

                                                   £i
                                                   O) in
                                                   — 01
                                                                                     O a
                                                                                     o: t—
                                                              f
                                            >4->     O
                                                                 X O
                                                                 01 4->
                                                                                                           i   ex
                                                                                                                            ,  £^
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            I/I
                                                                                                                                      O)
                                                           ex o 4->  o
                                                           * 0) 10 4J
                                                                                                              M O
                                                                                                            Of) 4-«
                                                                                                            O    01
                                                                                                              c o
                                                                                                            in •*- IB
 L.
 f

 CO
                                                                8
                                                                IO
                                                     I/I
                                                     10
                                                     O)
                   01
                   m
                   O)
 i1
o
                            o
                            to
                             •— ^  IO
                             •££»
                              ag>
                A

               O
               in
              o
                      
                            Z—-en   ^H
S":
  f»>
  in
                                   C9
                                     '1
                                                                                    I"
                                                                                   o
                                                        o
                                                        in
                                                       u
                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                        in
                                                                                                                       u
                                                                                fS
                                                                                ex


                                                                                I
                                                                                                  L.  10
                                                                                                  oi  x
                                                                                                 ok-

-------

ai
0
c
Ol
L.
ai
)+-.
01
ee






in
•3
lit
 C M
" » ^
•— "- -
= 5$
^il
. 	 , ex
0 ^
UJ
rj
^
i««
h-
gg
O
U
T i!
_J in f
"* o-o
^ ,&*
£
g
4-> —
in *J
ai 10
t- t-
3
O
O
ir»
U
LL!
g
O
_J
g
O
_l


in
01
o
S
to
4J
in
^

•o TJ-
c rs,
» * * o\
N fsl r^
•e 3 -03 u
CZ t. C L- Ol *
IO U IO CJ "D 4->

*^* *o "^ 10 10 01
>^-n >^n xE
^ f^. cr r*» 01 C
iooicn looicn *— o
X-Q*-I z-o>-i  O
OJ VI ^* 1.
Ol ^H Ol • 4-»
•O 4J (— C
IO •• CX O
L. 01 in 01 u
CD C ^
^^ ^^ o • * ••
ro co •— 4J -^ ^ c
• — • — 10 Ol Ol O
O U 4-> »-~
m in •*- ID vi in *J
•• Ol •• 01 c Ol 0)  in-w j: c « *J v. 0 — O) V.
4Jt— 4J-- 11 > »— O *J
CO. CO. M 4- 1. Q. C C
001 ooi in*^iooioc
ui- us- en E •— «- o O 4J
o^c-^e^uaj-^ 10
^••UWXOJ**-" >— ^ t — O ^ *-> *
fa>oioi4->ua £aiaiEieia-<-o4-»o ai 10 « >« c « o cc 10
^CXEiotnm T> c * •-! — in in Z *J

in in
u u. t t. m in in >> >, u
£ ff £ >v >» >, CO 10 £
10 10 10 -a tj
CO 9COCVJ ^^^ Pg
V e cx^s co«r>.inin o.
_ I- O O. O. iq-t-lOOOCX
SE OO OOOOO —II
•~H o O f
M CVJ ^ V ^H I
O v^
o« Kin^ inE m
•co o o o u a. o t
<->*r _j _i_i _io. _i.
V)
—» e inU-~
£  10
•^i— 10 >
U *J •>• L.
B 01 ai e » S .a i/i 4-> »
r— f- o Ol i
10 Ki- in -a i_ *•> c I
•r- C 01 "- 5^1- 0
f 0 -M C 3 S J
Sen 3-^ m er 01 «
I- re ail. oiin , -o o •— t
IO ^ •** OS Ol Z *O «
zl— • oP 5p. o.j
IO
f—
Ol
•O r—
CO IO
•o f>.
c en 4J
IQ ^ ^)

»- .  N .* -*
er 3 v i*.
10 i- 3 en
JE U 	 1 t— 1

V
IN O O
"O O) m .a co
Ol U >i «
in c»— ^- o •»vo
•O O 41 10 CSJOIf-l
01 o m e x —
i. i. — A n
o •o 01 c c •*-
e c > "O —me
i i- 10 c in o
1 -^ O 4J o> *^
>l 0) *> •»-  in «— t. *J
IO ^~ « 4J IO
u o u c u
•^ I. f Ol •*•
f— •M E O •—
Q. c 01 c ex
Ol Of O Ol
U O O O I.

X •
. C5 g
— ^- o o —
u E m 01 *» L.
O CO) Q.-» O
^•WJ<>«O  «4->OIJ=0)
U 4-1 O Ol *J o *>
Ol 10 *J C O >« C 10 Ol «
•ocvi-^io «-f^*-oe

i- I- U t. U t.
f £ f £ £ £
1C O 10 V CO "3-
en (M CM in TT
<— i «-•

•5 -°
5- °-
Q. Q.
tn ^
4-* 4-1
If | *
H cR *o A
/)«^ *> «J
gg 1 g
33 »«g2K «8
o
e
t-
•o
•a
^
/> 
v 3 •«>.
A U «
: — • 10 w
it n
- L. O IO
Sf O V.
in i. u

-------














-

















_
o
UJ
3
Z
1—
O
U
UJ
oo
t—




















01
u
c
s
Ol
n-
Ol
cc





•5
0 -a
S* w !_»
S * u

0 g UJ

•fW







§
at .2
44*1 £
^™ t ^
J.« !t
a.
*/7




1|
o -5
g
4J "^
VI 44
01 «0
t- «-
g
ft
I
g
U
_J







VI
Ol
Ol
l5%

44
VI
O)

•
•

> "0 « 1_
FH o r^ N ft
r» c in oi 3 ja
en 3 en 3 L. o
-i aC«-l — I O CC

-o --~
44 O> I/I CM
IO 44 Ol
VI 43 ><
C Ol 3 IO
Si1* **£
I/I VI >,
c "o vi
_>>_O 0 4>
•^•44 i "O 3 C X — • O
•—u •— — 01 *r u
 >— 44OI3E44
oivio. ew^ue
jcaioi ce oiocuoo
u 44 L. z <_> a. u z tj
^
44 1_ |
1 -^ 44 Ol I/I C
u jaxoo IE lo-a^oi *io
o.»^ o to u— »«• 5. * -o c u
•o u •— -o xr»x vioo. xoio —
44 Ol JC 01 01 ^^ ^ c 44 <^ ^3 ^ ^ ^j E
4-1 O 44 U • 1. b. ••- O •— 1 CL.^-01 S
CIQOIIO — O ••- O I. • . 5 — O u JC

t. t. 1. JC t.
 Q)
r— IS L.
a. ie 3
01 I. 44
i. en •—
.«— (J
i/i ie
§u 01
•F- .—
*• c —
44 £ J-
10 O Ol
I. Ol 44
44 44  VI
a-— S. oi«— -^
Ol —  o i s^lo
^ F— ai
44 44 t.
4^=44

VI 1*- 44

JJ-

• * »
?rs
^^
o o
I- 44
44 01
g!o
U 1
V* t
log
(J U

44
C
01 44 Ol
Illxil
0) u"o "^ U
E "O VI O— i *4





-I — *'V_
^~ 1
iS E "Si
X >> E S. 3,

•a


1- f- Sit— B. BL 0
•— »— a. ex CXCM Q
IO a Ol • O
44 44 t-l U f»- — 1 C7I •>
O O. O O— rn in en in
• en . , ^
~. — ^ x UJ
a
VI

2
o
I

e

i ?
JC 01
44 b
fe ,9
UJ JC
^^ ^ ^



e
Ol
01
u
en
t.

-------
CO
      CO


      C—3
                      crzi
                      no
                rv:    rv-
                                      &
                                             !
                                                           CfcT
ft—i
                                      CO
                                C	5

-------
    Chronic studies have been conducted with several species of fish
including goldfish, bluegill, channel catfish, trout, sunfish,  salmon,
and fathead minnow.  These studies show that high residues of mirex
are accumulated and retained, and that there are indications of
effects on survival,  growth, and/or reproduction.   (U.S. EPA, 1981;
Buckler, et al, 1981).  In a chronic study using two species of warm-
water fishes,  bluegills were fed  0, 1, 3 or 5 mg/kg of mirex for 168
days (Van Valen et al., 1968).   No mortality or tissue pathology
resulted from the mirex exposure;  however,  growth of the bluegills in
the highest treatment groups was adversely affected.  Goldfish in
ponds treated with 1.0 ppm mirex showed  gill edema,  kidney lesions,
and distended gall bladders.  Studies with channel catfish reported
similar results.  A three-acre pond and surrounding drainage area were
treated with 1.7 g mirex bait acre.  After 6 months exposure, catfish
showed residues of 0.65 ppm;  however,  no significant increase in
mortality or adverse  effects were noted  (Collins  et al.,  1973).  Cat-
fish in ponds treated three  times  in 8 months with  1.25 Ibs mirex
bait/acre showed no adverse  effects  (Hyde et al., 1974).  A study with
fathead minnows estimated an EC50 of 34 ug/L after 120 days exposure
when possible signs of reproductive impairment were noted (Buckler et
al., 1981).

    Mirex is retained for long periods of time in fish with little or
no elimination.  Brook trout fed  a mirex contaminated diet (0.7 mg/kg)
for 104 days showed no significant reduction in mirex residues after
385 days of uncontaminated feed  (Skea et al., 1981).  Substantial
bioconcentration of mirex was reported in goldfish and bluegills
exposed in ponds treated  with mirex bait (Van Valen et al.,  1968).
Whole body residues in  goldfish exposed at  0.1 and  1.0 ppm increased
throughout the experiment.  On Day 224 of the experiment goldfish
taken from the 1.0 ppm group contained 61.0 ppm mirex in muscle and
150 ppm mirex in whole body.  In the  0.1 ppm treatment group,  11.6 ppm
in muscle and 45 ppm mirex in the whole body were found.  Bluegills
exposed to mirex in ponds treated with  100.2 kg or  0.13 kg mirex bait
(theoretical concentrations  of 1.0 or 0.0013  ppm,  respecitvely, in
water)  accumulated throughout the  first  84 days at  the  1.0 ppm treat-
ment level; residues  were detected up to Day 56.

    Three applications of mirex  bait  (1.25 Ibs/acre) to ponds contain-
ing channel catfish resulted in residues in  fish averaging  0.015 ppm
in filets and 0.255 ppm in fat (Hyde et al.,  1974).   In a  large scale
study,  adult fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) were exposed to
mirex in water for 32 days at an  average concentration  of 1.2 ug/L
(Veith et al.,  1979).   The resulting bioconcentration factor, based on
a sample of 5 whole fishes,  was determined to be 18,100.  Fathead
minnows exposed to 34 ug/L mirex for 120 days have accumulation fac-
tors in a range of 12,000 to 28,000 with tissue residues continuing to
increase through the  120-day exposure period (Buckler et  al.,  1981).

    In general, mirex concentrations increase with individual fish
weight and appear to parallel reported lipid concentrations for
similar tissues (Insalaco et al.,  1982).  The highest tissue concen-


                                  10

-------
trations have been found in the liver and viscera,  followed by the
skin and muscle.

    Freshwater invertebrates are sensitive to mirex with acute LD50
values  for several  species ranging from 40 to 1000 ppb.  (Naqvi and de
la Cruz, 1983).   Other invertebrates including the water flea (Daphnia
magna, D. pulex), midge larvae  (Chironomus plumosus),  and amphipod
(Gammaris pseudolimaeus) showed 48-hr ECSOs of >1 ppm  (Sanders et al.,
1981; Johnson and Finley,  1980).  Mosquito larvae exposed to 1.0 and
0.1 ppm mirex in water showed a 48-hr LC50 of 0.489 ppm (Alexander and
Norment, 1974).   Muncy and Oliver  (1963) found no effect of mirex on
red crayfish  (Procambaris  clarki) at 0.1 ppm during a 72-hr static
exposure. Acute studies (48-hr)  with juvenile crayfish Procambaris
blandingi exposed to  0.1 and 0.5 ppb mirex for 48 hours showed that
mortality was delayed for  up to 4 days following treatment,  but that
65% and 71% respectively of the exposed populations died.

    Hydra, a  freshwater  cnidarian,  treated with  1.0, 0.1 and 0.01 ppm
mirex in acetone solution  for 6 days exhibited behavioral changes such
as retracting their body tubes and tentacles after 2 days exposure
(Lue and de la  Cruz,  1978).  Peak mortality occurred on Day 4 at  1.0
ppm, with a time lag  between behavioral changes and death.  The 96-hr
LC50 was predicted to be 4.1 ppm.

    Lue and de  la Cruz (1977) studied the toxicity of mirex on two
soil macroarthropods:  the land isopod Armadil 1 idium vulgare and the
soil millipede  Oxidus gracilus.  Feeding a diet ranging from 25 to 3000
ppm mirex, KD50  (knockdown dose for 50 percent of the exposed popula-
tion) and LD50 values for  A.  vulgare at  10 days exposure were 11.6
ppm and  35.2 ppm, respectively; and  for 0. gracilus, 5.4 ppm and  198.7
ppm, respectively.

    The earthworm Eisenia  foetida, exposed to deposits of mirex on
filter paper  for 48 hours was relatively  resistant to mirex within
LC50 >l,000/pg/cm2  (Roberts and Borough,  1984).

    Some chronic effects data for invertebrates were located.  Studies
with several  species  including daphnids, midge larvae, and amphipods
estimated a maximum acceptable  toxicant concentration of <2.4 ug/L for
Gammarus after  120 days  of exposure  (Sanders et al., 1981).   Tests
performed on Hyallela azteca,  an  amphipod, by Naqvi and de la Cruz
(1973)  and Jessimen and Quashi  (1983) report 25 day (600 hours)  and 13
day LCSOs at concentrations of 1 ug/L and 100 ug/L respectively.
Other tests showed effects ranging up to 1000 ug/L (Table 1).

    Freshwater invertebrates have been  found to bioconcentrate mirex
following exposure at levels used in the fire ant control program.
Laboratory studies utilizing concentrations much higher (1 and 5 ppb)
have confirmed this (Ludke et al.,  1971).   Invertebrates have been
found to accumulate mirex  residues in lipid bodies with varying rates
of elimination depending on the species,  p.  magna exposed to 34 ug/L
mirex for 21 days accumulated 8,025 times the concentration in the
water (Sanders et al., 1981).   Species of crayfish accumulated a

                                  11

-------
residue 16,860 fold greater than that in the exposure water (Ludke et
al., 1971).

    Two studies analyzed the effect of mirex on freshwater algae.
Kricher et al. (1975) exposed the unicellular green algae Chlorella
pyrenoidosa to 1.0 ppm  mirex dissolved in acetone.   The 1  percent
acetone concentration was found to be somewhat toxic to Chlorella.
When comparisons were made between the mirex sample and the acetone
control, the mean mirex-exposed density was found to be 19 percent
lower than the acetone control after 164 hours.

    In another study,  exposure of another uncellular green alga,
Chiamydomonas to  1.0 ppm mirex for 168 hours reduced photosynthesis 55
percent and reduced the respiration rate 28 percent (de la Cruz  and
Naqvi,  1973).

                            Health Effects

    Reported single oral dose LDSO's for rats range from 365 to  740
mg/kg  (U.S. EPA, 1981)  (Table 2).  LDSO's for dogs range from 1,000 to
15,000 mg/kg  (Larson et al., 1979) (Figure 1).   The toxicity rating
for mirex is 4 (very toxic)  with  a probable oral lethal dose (human)
of 50-500 mg/kg,  between I  tsp.  and 1 ounce for a 70 kg (150 Ib)
person  (U.S.  EPA,  1981).  No studies  of mirex effects or toxicity  in
humans were found in this investigation.  Animal studies indicate  that
mirex is not metabolized or detoxified in mammals.  Mirex is stored in
adipose tissue and excreted at low rates in the feces and in only
trace amounts in  the urine  (Chambers et  al., 1982).  Studies with
mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys have shown that mirex is rapidly
absorbed from the digestive tract and is quickly and readily stored in
adipose and other tissues.   Mirex is readily transmitted to offspring
through both placental and  lactogenic  routes  (Chu et al.,  1981b;
Rogers and Grabowski,  1983; Grabowski and  Payne, 1983a  and  1983b).

    Effects of mirex include reduced food and water consumption,
decrease in body weight,  induced cytochrome P-450,  and increased liver
weight.  Male mice fed 10 mg/kg mirex for 15 days showed induced
cytochrome P-450, decreased  blood glucose levels, and a significant
decrease in body  weight  (Fujimori et al.,  1983).  The chronicity
factor for mirex  (i.e., the  ratio of the single dose LD50 to the 90
dose LD50) is 60.8,  the highest value  reported for any pesticide  (U.S.
EPA, 1981).

    Few truly chronic studies of mirex have been published,  but  sub-
chronic studies report hepatotoxic, enzymatic,  reproductive, carcino-
genic, and teratogenic effects.   The teratogenicity of mirex has been
shown in numerous studies (Grabowski and Payne,  1980b;  Rogers and
Grabowski, 1983; Chu et al., 1981b).   Teratogenic effects  include
edema, heart defects,  and cataracts.   Rats and mice treated with mirex
have produced smaller  litters with reduced survival  in  the offspring.

    Carcinogenic effects have also been  reported (Innes et al.,  1969;
Ulland  et  al.,  1977; U.S.  DHEW,  1980).   Mirex administered in the  diet

                                  12

-------



















X
ce
£
£•
o

2
UJ
>
o:
L±J
cc
3

^
a
t—

1/1
u
u
LL.
LL.

^^
—
^~
LU
I
i

U.
o
>-
g

^

1 1 (
	 i
«t
h-



















Ol
U
c
Ol
i.
01
o>
ec.






i/i
3
s-g «.
C > 4->
« ? 0
•— m *>
•5|t
yg"
S





in
C
„, o
Ol .f,
X U jj
. 1 f— *•*
2s.s
*O 3 i.
3 i/i ~
^^ 0
«* Ol
D.
1^1








U =
3 1
in —
o -o
ex u
Xy
2.
LU


4- -2
in 4-1
o> ra
t- i-
3
O





I
^
Ol
••jj
£
3
1
^X
X
LU




in
Ol
a
W
#


4-*
in
*


4-*
01
ro
— CO
e>2
j"!
•••^ •
3 t—
LJ- 10

•o
1 O)
CX Ol 4J
g 4J e 10 in
5 .c 5 •»- oi
in en 10 k. u —
§— Ol f O *-"
QJ .C U I/I T-
u S L. o 
k. 4-> 10 —
1- X 10 X 4J
Ol X> "O ••- U T3 U
4J O Q) T3 C IO
•0.0 m -c «
X ra O> Ol O)
«^ » Ol L. O O E
•5 c t. oi 3 us s,
o o o > -D «r M
o— oi oi e i c
U. 4J -D l/> «-i O. Ol

i.
Ol "O
X"O Ol
c u
•o ie 3
Ol » "O
4-* cm
IO I*- O ••••—
— o u x o
3 ra i_
u •O in •w 4->
•— O 4J e
re jr in f o
u 4j oi u u
oi 4J ra
in n ««, o> ••
Oi m m
34." 4J Ol O>
•— — C E 4->
IO Ol C Ol — IO
> O 01 E 4-1 U
_J -0 4J H-
O 1- * Oi —
in O) oi oi E d
>- .c 10 X. ra oi
_i 4-> ^ (- m i_
§~~
c .c
1- U
o
U 4->
IO
C Ol l-
U Ol
OI-»- ^
J< £ •>.
••^ 0) en
Oi> E
2^2

X
IO
T3
in
i— i





01
je
~^
i1
CM
m
t— i
IO
"~o
?
_J





ce
i_>
"* 01
•LTl
oi oi n
3 10 O
O E fn
X —
T en
CO i- CO CO IO
n*. 10 f^. r^ Oi
Ol Ol Oi ^^
-H 4J X. X. 1-
a, oi .
1/1 i*. en S 1/1 6 "o
O •— rv o O 3
i-> O Ol •— •— Ol 4J
Z 3 — • Z Z 3C 01
Ol '
O in ^ o
4-> 4-> 4J JE CO I/I
§U 4-> ^H .» 1 4-1
Ol C — 4J X « U
O3—i^ —x-ce—t- oi
O T3 4-> v»_ X Oi 41 4J O 4-1 l>-
•— 10 oi inoio>3EU4Jc: •*-
J3 •— -O OlinkO4JOlOI Ol
01 -^ O 3lO-»-UIOU.^-O i
C>X-r- •OOlSJTOI— H)C U
— oio c — t-4Ji_-oeo -^ '
»— oi m u <*- 4-> o o c
Ol XJ Ol O) C O T3 VI — O>
moioi o i- — QJ i*. oi 4-1 x oi
IOV1UC 4J 4J O 3 t. 1- O
SO c -r- x 1- C m -o o ti 4J
uie u o> oi 3 oi i/> •— cx4-> c ie
u 3 or k. u>ocnxinoQ;o u
oi •— c 10 •^•^•gciooii.'^'^ oi
00101 (j X'-w — 'Oi. ex^o 4J t-




• •
X
Oi in
1- Ol
f 4->
E 10
^r g I I
10 ex
I. 01
en u

^— ••
10 1/1
u •—
— o
C L.
f 4->
U C
Ol O
t- 0

*J
c «^.4J ie
•^- Ol IO
-X O
E X-^W
_ Q.I— Ol(M • _ _ _
tJ °-"Z EQ^ * T9 4-* *V. .V O
Oi E Ol— Ol «^ 5
^ ex i- •— E en 10
•^ ex u 10 g i
01 3 4-> in O
— ^ E eo o u no O
^5 • O O CM «O «*»
^- csj r- O E
O CM -H O O O
— J CM x>* in _i in
p . 4J 4J fCi Op O
^PJ« — O> _lp- _l





m^-»
3 m
u 3
«n 4J
>l O
E C
S S85
J3 Ol P— 4J 4J 4->
O Q. O <0 
•o
4J
C
01
u
L
el
O
in
L.
O
M-
§
4-1
V
U
4J
§
u
4J
_J
01
«U
II
S
^-
^j


Ol

4^
in
i
s
•j
»
o
o
£=

J3




















































4J
C
I
g
•o
ource
in
c
•r-
•c
o>
4J
L.
0
ex
Ol
L.

•s
Z
n
ce
Jg

u

13

-------


































^~^
o
LU
Z

Z
o

,
UJ
<
^.























11

c
01

01
o>
cc





i/i
O-o
c 2! 4-»
re £ o

5J O1^
£




c
Ol °
X U ^
*"* re *°
*— u u
re 3 £
3 VI .^.
°"« 
(-t










3 D
Iii
1*^ ^^




c
o

I/I 4-1
ai re
i- i-
S

^
Ol
Exposure I


in
01
S
£
(fl
OJ
^







(/I
u
c o^

•o CT>
C3^





1
1






.^
X C
^ o
J- —
1 re
u
O)-f-
•o »—
re Q.
i. Ol
014.
^— • •>
re tn
u »—
-- 0
C i.
u c
O) O
»- u

in 4J
8J=
W*
•— Ol O^i
— JD I
re 3 4->
s- 4-> re x
0 T>
— j= c o
IJ O) J3
^~ re >

o o 01 o
4-1
c in 01 01
k. VI »•»
O X O —
<_) j= o e



>^
•o
•—4



01
1
n
esri
mo
o^
^
c
re i.
E 4-1
in
is
Ol
re i^>
0£— '
















1 1
1 1






.„
X C
E re

•§£
re Q.
u 01
01 l-
^— • •
re in
u f~
— 0
C V-
u c
01 0
t- 0


P x—
"re •— "a?
i- ^" J3
o re 3
^ o
— u
o r- re

3 4->
c cm
re t.
0) OX
CL c ^ o


VI

re
•o
•c-


01
-^ Ol
i1 =:!
in inco
o o «•
41. —
— C
£ i.
V 4->
VI
•— c
IE
V
4J _g-
re wo
cc ^~
0
2

^ *
C JZ
re 01
vji
C JD


O i<:





i i




S
Ol

» x
in o> c
 O
O t— C

4J O —
c e 3
re k. "-
Ol O O


in
X
re
•o
IT)


Ol
Ol >«.
t *»*
g *~*s
o in in E ^^
SO^-l — 1
unco >HUJ
o o PO o O








O
t-H

•o •
c j:
re 01
vi
01 1-
C J3
f E

cs i


_§

TJ *
X UO
in o in
• «
r- C •

"o — S o.
4-> — O.
C 3

5SSS
VI -0

in re 4-1
X"D re
re oi
•o  o
"i re
u
!£


Ol L.
^~ • »
re in
u «—

C L.
U C
O) O
1- 0

4J 01
C -v
^ V—
O> 4-> E
> m
"o 5-^ j:
«- .. . OJ
•DUO*
• • O) **• X
^ r- O ^
re x o
E X O1J3

o ••- s. o


VI
X
re
•o
9-4


Ol
?
,_,
e
•— "O
ii
in
|S
*> J?
re {?>
ef —

CO

Ol


«
in
01
c


u





1











Ol

o
JD
re

in
re

I
i/i




Ol
•re
I/I
(C
u

l^


VI
X
re
T3
•-H


Ol
$
A
1
01-^
»- C
11
in
— c
3 re
4J JT
re to
tt *— ^

^
CO
J= Ol

3
£ :
o —
i.

>- Ol
01 1
in Ol re L. •-
re E L- 01 •— -a i
O) 4-1 in re o> O
u°£-oi?§3i;
*^* c 4-1 re o c •*•
4J •"• O > — O ""
c o> c OJ m 0)

U BO > Ol L. Ol J3
&"~C/1 c— « * OJ
^_ -o o cna. i- +J
K' S43eiJ?S.-S


x
Ol
E o
t.

°g
XO

k VI
3 m

re
X u
in •«-
sii
A k


in
w
g
in
c

in
O J<

of


in
X
•o
CO



X
F~
in
I
t»-
LU





^j
re
ce












c

in *
Ol*O
re re
JE •—

— •o
^l X















































14

-------
                        CO
                        u
                        c
                        Ol
                                IB
                                •O
                                C
                                                •O
                                               •— 10
                                               xi
                                               •O
                                        c
                                        o
                                                                   CO   00
                                                                   f*«   h»
                                                                  s
                                                                  O
                                      IB
                                      01
                                O

                                in
                                      IB  0)
                                   o>-*-  01
                                o •<- -o  10
                                                 3 CD
                                     c -o
                                     10
                                O) c    U
                                L.  IB t ••-
                                /a    o *•>
                               £  s. I us
                               *• •»• >T3 T3 CU IB
                                                 1-  01    J t     I     ,
                                                *J  in  ..           .     I
                                            .:-
                                        3  0)0 E J- — 01 01
                                       ~>f~C Ol (j^^fw*^-
                >> U ^
                                                                  IO
                                                                  u
o
LU
O
o
CD
                      a.
                     to
                              o
                              LO
   O
   t.
                              C
                              o
                  *•
                  3 3
                  Wl •^>
                  o-o
   o

  4-1
   IB
                                       a.
                                       Ol
                                       t.
                                       c  u
                                       O  IB
                                      U  QJ
                                                                    'o o
                                      O X U
                                      CM CU
                                         t en

                                      o'l-g

                                         en IB
                                       -^ c
                                      o •-.••-
                                             IB


                                            O
                                      IB Q
                                      US  C
                                     O t-i-t-
                                                 u    •—
                                                 1-    IB
                                                 01    t
                                                 Q.    o
                  I/I 4->
                  a>  IB
                             •o

                             CM
                    Ol
                    >
                    Ol
                    I/I
                    o
                J       £

                Ol      Ol
                -*       Ji

                o,      |i
                                                                    8
                         go
                         in
                                                                   A



                                                                   g
                                                eo   CM

                                                      go
                                                      u)
                                                q   a
                   t/l
                   01
    10
    t
    o>
 c •—

-3!
                   I/I
                   O)
 •B  e
 II
«-  c
    ai
                                             t    IB

                                          €2    §
                                                               Ol IB

                                                               O  E
                                                                   IS
                                                                               15

-------
of 26 rats of each sex for 18 months produced statistically signifi-
cant incidences of liver  tumors in test animals  (Innes et al.,  1977).
Forty percent of the treated mice  exhibited hepatomas  compared to only
4 percent in the control.   In a  second  study, rats receiving 50 or 100
ppm mirex for 18 months showed an  increase in liver  tumors and lesions
(Ulland et al., 1977).   The incidence of these  tumors  was shown to be
statistically significant.  In an unpublished study  by the Frederick
Cancer Research Center under contract with the  National Cancer Insti-
tute (U.S. DHEW, 1980), preliminary results showed a high and
apparently dose-related incidence  of neoplastic nodules of the liver,
hepatocellular carcinoma, and monocytic leukemia in  rats at dietary
doses of 25, 50 and 100 ppm for 2  years.

    Studies have been conducted with  the major  photodegredation
products of mirex:   chlordectone,  photomirex (8-monohydromirex) and
dihydromirex (2.8-dihydromirex).   Photomirex and chlordectone have
been found to be very similar to mirex in that they both exhibit
strong lipophilicity (bioaccumulate in fatty tissue),  are not readily
eliminated, and are highly persistent in  the environment.  Though
studies on mirex have been well  documented, there is little informa-
tion available on the toxicity of  dihydromirex,  photomirex and
chlordectone.  Chlordectone and photomirex have been shown to cause
similar effects as mirex:   increased  liver weights,  induction of the
microsomal mixed function oxidases, and dose related histological
abnormalities in the thyroid and liver (Fujimori et  al.,  1983;
Yarbrough et al.,  1981; Chu et al., 1981a; Hallett et al.,  1978).  In
these studies,  the toxicities of mirex, photomirex and chlordectone
were compared.   Fujimori et al.  (1983)  treated male  mice with 10, 25
or 50 mg/kg chlordectone, mirex and photomirex.   Acute test results
showed that clearly distinguishable differences exist between these
three compounds in terms of biological effects.   Both daily food and
water intake were significantly decreased in mice treatment with
mirex.   In contrast,  treatment with chlordectone or  photomirex
increased food and water consumption.   Chloraectone  caused significant
motor incoordination, where mirex  and photomirex did not.  Mirex and
photomirex caused a significant increase in  liver weight, whereas
chlordectone treatment resulted in only a  slight increase.  Mirex and
photomirex were similar in inducing hepatic MFO (mixed-function
oxidase system).

    In a 28-day study by  Yarbrough et  al.,  (1981) there did not appear
to be any consistently significant differences  between the qualitative
or quantitative toxic effects of mirex and photomirex in rats.  These
results suggest that mirex and its degredation products may differ
substantially  in their short-term effects,  but  not in  long-term
toxicity.

    Tolerances for residues of mirex in food products were set by the
U.S.  EPA as follows:   0.1 ppm in fat or meat  from cattle, goats, hogs,
horses, poultry,  and sheep; 0.1 ppm in eggs; 0.1 ppm in milk fat; 0.01
ppm in or on all other raw agricultural commodities, exclusive of
eggs, milk fat, and animal fat  (U.S.   EPA,  1981).

                                  16

-------
                           RECOMMENDATIONS


                               Aquatic


    An Aquatic Life Criterion consists of a Criterion Maximum Concen-
tration (CMC) and a Criterion Continuous  Concentration  (CCC).

According to EPA guidelines  (Stephan et al.,  1985),  effects  data  for
eight species including two fish and six invertebrates are required
for establishing criteria  (Table 3).   Insufficient data on acute
toxicity of mirex precludes the calculation of the FAV and,  therefore,
of the CMC.

    The Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC)  is  equal  to the
lowest of three values, the Final Chronic Value,  the Final Plant
Value, and the Final Residue Value.  Insufficient data on  chronic
toxicity of mirex precludes the calculation of a  CCC.

    A Final Residue Value for freshwater biota was calculated using a
method by EPA (1983)  using data discussed above.


    The Final Residue Value was calculated as follows:


    FinalResidue Value =        S. EPA action level  for fish
                                   bioconcentration factor
where:
    U.S. EPA action level for fish =0.1 ppm
    Bioconcentrationfactor  (geometric mean)  =15,240
therefore:
    Final Residue Value =  _.__! ppm
                            15,240
                        = .007 ug/L
                                  17

-------
  TABLE 3.   DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR CALCULATION OF AQUATIC LIFE INTERIM
            CRITERIA--MIREX
 Criterion Requirements
    Aquatic Toxicity
                                  Available Data
    Acceptability of
     Available Data
 Acute Test Results from tests on:
   A salmonid (class Osteichthyes)
                                         YES
                                           YES
 A warm water species commercially
   or recreational ly important
   important (class Osteichthyes)
 Another family in the phylum            YES
   Chordata(fish,amphibian,etc.)
 A planktonic crustacean (cladoceran,     YES
   copepod,  etc.)
Benthic crustacean (ostracod,           YES
  isopod,scud,crayfish,etc.)
Insect  (mayfly, dragonfly, damselfly,    YES
  stonefly,  mosquito, etc.)
Phylum other than Arthropoda/Chordata   YES
  (Rotifera, Annelida, Mollusca)
Another family of insect                YES
            NO
          (no LC50)
            NO
          (no  LC50)

            NO
          (no LC50)
            YES
 (controls;  replicates)
            NO
         (no LC50)
            YES
(controls; replicates)
            NO
 (not aquatic  species)
            YES
(controls; replicates)
Acute-chronic ratios with species from
three different families:
  One fish
  One invertebrate
  Acutely sensitive freshwater
    animal species
                                         NO
                                         NO
                                         NO
Acceptable test results from a test with:
  Freshwater algae                        YES

  A vascular plant                         NO

Bioaccumulation factor with a freshwater  YES
species (if a maximum permissible tissue
concentration is available)
                                                           NO
                                                        (no LC50)
                                                           YES
                                               (controls, replicates)
                                  18

-------
    This concentration is,  lower than 0.1 ppb where delayed mortality
was noted in Procambans blandingi,  but higher  than  the  criterion  of
0.001  ug/L given in Quality Criteria for Water (1976).  The advisory
concentration for mirex will remain 0.001 ug/L, the same as that  given
in the 1976 publication, based on the toxicity information above  and
incorporating a safety factor at .01.

                                Health

    No epidemiological  studies of the effects  of mirex  on human health
have been found which could contribute data useful  to the derivation
of a criterion (Table 4).   However,  mirex has  been  determined  to  be
carcinogenic in three separate studies with mice and  rats  (Innes,  et
al.,  1969; Ulland et al.,  1977, NIOSH, 1978).   Although data generated
by all three studies show statistically significant increases  in
heptocellular  carcinomas,  the U.S. DHEW (1980)  study  represents the
best candidate for use in calculating a water concentration of mirex
that results in a cancer risk of 10-5.  The water quality  criterion
for mirex is based on the induction of hepatocellular carcinomas  in
male Fischer (F344/N)  rats.   The results of the unpublished 2-yr
feeding study by the Frederick Cancer Institute show  dose-related
incidence with the unadjusted incidence of  the low dose group
significantly different from the control group.  Because this  study
was not available  for  our review, the criterion estimate for mirex was
determined  from data reported  by the  U.S.  EPA  (1983).   Using the  data
from U.S.  DHEW (1980),  the  slope estimate from  the multi stage model
is adjusted to give a  human carcinogenic potency estimate of 7.15
(mg/kg/day)-l  (U.S. EPA, 1983).

    The intake of the mirex from ambient water is assumed  from two
sources:  (1) drinking  an average volume of 2  liters of water  per day;
(2) ingesting an average of 6.5 grams of fish  per day.  Because of
accumulation of residues in fish, the amount of mirex in fish  is equal
to a factor R  times the water  concentration (mg/kg/water).  Using
methodology reported by EPA  (1983),  the water  concentration in mg/L
corresponding to a life time cancer risk of 10~5 for a 70  kg person is
calculated by the formula:

                   C = 7_0 kg x 10—
                        qI (2 + 0.0065R)

where:
                   q±= 7.15 (mg/kg/day)-1
                   R = 15,240

For a lifetime cancer risk below 10-6 the criteria for mirex in water
are:   4.9 ng/L if exposure  is through water only without consumption
of contaminated aquatic organisms; 0.097 ng/L  if exposure  is through
aquatic organisms only without ingestion of contaminated water;  0.093
ng/L if exposure is through consumption of  both contaminated water and
aquatic organisms.


                                  19

-------
    Sufficient data were not provided in the EPA (1983)  report of the
DHEW (1980)  study,  to derive  a  threshold effect  water  quality
criterion.   A threshold effect  criterion is  derived from a no-
observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL), lowest-observed-adverse-effect
level  (LOAEL), or lowest-observed-effect level  (LOEL)  from a chronic
toxicity assay of at least 90 days duration.   None  of  these  values
were reported in the EPA (1983)  document,  nor were  they  found in
studies reviewed as part of this investigation.
                                  20

-------
TABLE 4.  DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR CALCULATIONOF HUMAN HEALTH INTERIM
          CRITERIA--MIREX
Criterion Requirements
 Human Health Effects
Available Data
Acceptability of
 Available Data
Non-Threshold:
  Carcinogen                             YES

  Tumor incidence tests  (Incidence of    YES
    tumor formation significantly more
    than the control for at least one
    dose level), or
  Data set which gives estimate of       YES
    carcinogenetic risk, or
  Lifetime average exposure tests, or    YES

  Human epidemiology studies              NO
    (if available, not required)

Threshold:
  Non-carcinogens                         NO
  No observed adverse effect level        NO
    (at least 90-day), or
  Lowest observed effect level            NO

Acceptable Daily Intake:                  NO
  Daily water consumption                YES

  Daily fish consumption                 YES

  Bioconcentration factor                 NO
  Non-fish dietary intake                YES

  Daily intake by inhalation              NO

Threshold Limit Value:
  (Based on 8-hour time-weighted          NO
    average concentrations in air)

Inhalation Studies:
  Available pharmacokinetic data          NO
  Measurements of absorption efficiency   NO
  Comparative excretion data              NO
                         YES
                   (EPA approved)
                         YES
                   (3 studies with
                   valid data., EPA
                       approved)
                         YES
                   (EPA approved)
                         YES
                   (EPA approved)
                         YES
                  (EPA assumptions)
                         YES
                  (EPA assumptions)

                         YES
                  (EPA assumptions)
                                  21

-------
                               REFERENCES

Abraham, R.,  K. F. Benitz, and R.  Mankes.   1983.  Ploidy patterns in
hepatic tumors induced by mirex.  Experimental and Molecular Patho-
logy.   38:271-282.

Alexander, S. D.  and B. R. Norment.  1974.   Effects of mirex on  popu-
lations of Aedes triseriatus say.  Mosquito News.   Vol 34,  No.  1, p.
112.

Buckler, D. R.,  W.  Arthur,  Jr., F. L. Mayer, and J. Huckins.  1981.
Acute and chronic effects of kepone and mirex on the fathead minnow.
Trans. Am.  Fish.   Soc.  110:270-280.

Buelke, S. J., R. A. Byrd, and C.  J. Nelson.  1983.  Blood flow during
pregnancy in the rat:   III  Alterations  following mirex treatment.
Teratology.   27:401-410.

Byrd, R. A.,  J. F. Holson,  C.  A.  Kimmel, M.  D. Morris, and J. F.
Young.  1981.  Altered pattern of prenatal toxicity in rats due to
different treatment schedules with mirex.   Toxic.  Appl. Pharmac.
60:213-219.

Cabral, J.R.P., F. Raitano,  T. Mollner, S. Bronczyk and P. Shubik.
1979.  Acute  toxicity of  pesticides in  hamsters.   Toxicol.  App.
Pharmacol.  Vol 48(1): A  192  (Abstract).

Chambers,  J. E.,  R.  S. Case, E. G. Alley, and J. D. Yarbrough.  1982.
Short term fate of mirex and  2,8-dihydromirex in Rats.  J.  Agric. Food
Chem.  30:878-882.

Chernoff,  N.  and  R.  J. Kavlock.   1982.  An in vivo  teratology screen
utilizing pregnant mice.   J. Toxic.  Environ. Health.   10:541-550.

Chu, I.,  D. C. Villeneure, B.  L.  Macdonald, V.  E.  Secours,  and  V. E.
Valli.  1981a. Reversibility of  the toxicological changes  induced by
photomirex and mirex.  Toxicology.   21(3) :235-250.

Chu, I.,  D. C. Villeneuve, V. E.  Secours,  V. E. Valli, and G. C.
Becking.   198Ib.   Effects of photomirex and  mirex  on  reproduction in
the  rat.  Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  60:549-556.

Collins, H. L.,  J.  R. Davis, and  G. P. Markin.  1973.  Residues of
mirex in channel catfish  and other aquatic organisms.   Bull. Environ.
Contam.  and Toxicol.  lO(2):73-77.

de la Cruz, A. A. and S. M. Naqvi, 1973. Mirex  incorporation in the
environment:   Uptake in aquatic organisms  and the  effects on the rate
of photosynthesis and respiration.  Arch.  Environ.   Contam. Toxicol.
1:255.
                                  22

-------
Doull J., C.  D. Klaassen,  M.  0. Amdur (eds).   1980.  Casarett and
Doull's Toxicology.   The Basic Science  of  Poisons, 2nd ed.  Macmillan
Publishing Co., Inc., New York, p. 638.

Federal Register.   1980.   Guidelines and methodology used in prepara-
tion at health effect assessment chapters  of the consent decree water
quality criteria documents.   45:79347-79356.

Francis,  B. M.  and R.  L. Metcalf.   1984.   Evaluation of  mirex, photo-
mirex and chlordectone in  the terrestrial  aquatic  laboratory model
ecosystem.   Environ.  Health  Perspectives.  54:341-346.

Fujimori,  K., I. K. Ho, H.  M.  Mehendale, and D. C.  Villeneuve.  1983,
Comparative toxicology of mirex,  photomirex, and chlordecone after
oral administration to the mouse.  2:49-60.

Gaines, T. D. and  R. D. Kimbrough.  1970.   Oral toxicity of mirex in
adultsuckling rats.  Arch. Environ. Health.   Vol 21,  7-14.

Gaines,  T.  D.  1960.   The  acute toxicity of  pesticides  to rats.
Toxicol.   and Appl. Pharmacol. 2, 88-99.

Gaines,  T.  D..   1969.   Acute  toxicity  of pesticides.  Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol.   14,515-534.

Grabowski,  C. T.   1983.  The  electrocardiogram of  fatal  and newborn
rats and dysrhythmias induced by toxic exposure.   Dept.  of Biology,
University of Miami,  Coral Gables, Florida.

Grabowski, C. T. and  D. B. Payne.  1983a.   The causes of perinatal
death induced by prenatal exposure of rats to the pesticide mirex.
Part 1:   Prepaturition observations of  the cardiovascular system.
Teratology.  27:7-11.

Grabowski, C. T. and  D. B. Payne.  1983b.   The causes of perinatal
death induced by prenatal exposure of rats to the pesticide mirex.
Part II:   Postnatal observations.  J.  Toxicol.  Environ.  Health.
11:301-315.

Hallett, D. J.,  K. S. Khera,  D. R.  Stoltz,  I. Chu,  D. Villeneuve, and
G.  Trivett.  1978.  Photomirex:  Synthesis and assessment of acute
toxicity,  tissue distribution and mutagenicity.   J.  Agric. Food  Chem.
26:388.

Hewitt, L.  A., W. R. Hewitt, and L. Gabriel.   1983. Fractional
hepatic localization of CHC13 in mice  and  rats treated with chlorde-
cone or mirex.   Fund.  Appl. Toxicol.   3:489-495.

Hilton, J. W..  P.  V.  Hodson,  H.  E.  Braun,  J. L. Leatherland, and S. J.
Slinger.   1983.  Contaminant  accumulation  and physiological response
in rainbow trout  (Salmo gairdneri)  reared  on naturally contaminated
diets.  Can. J.  Fish.  Aquat. Sci.  40:1987-1994.

                                  23

-------
Hyde, K. M.,  S. Stokes,  J. F. Fowler, J. Graves,  and F. Bonner.   1974.
The effect of mirex on  channel  catfish production.  Trans. Amer.  Fish.
Soc.,  No. 2:366.

Innes, J. R.  M., B. M.  Ulland, and M. G.  Valerio.  1969.  Bioassay. of
pesticides and industrial chemicals for tumorigenicity in mice:   A
preliminary  note.  J.  Nat'l. Cancer Inst.   422(6):1101.

Insalaco,  S. E.,  J. C. Makarewicz,  and J. N. McNamara.  1982.  The
influence of sex,  size and season on mirex levels within  selected
tissues of Lake Ontario salmon.  J. Great Lakes  Res.  8(4):660-665.

Jessiman, B.  J.  and S. U. Quadri.   1983.  Bioaccumulation kinetics of
the organochlorine pesticide mirex in amphipods.   Ecotox. and Environ.
Sat.  7:295-305.

Johnson, W. W. and M.  T. Finley.  1980.   Handbook of acute toxicity of
chemicals to fish and aquatic intertebrates.  Summaries of toxicity
tests conducted at Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory,
1965-1978.

Karl, P. I. and J. D.  Yarbrough.  1984.   A comparison of  mirex-induced
liver growth to  liver regeneration.  Toxicol.  Ltrs.  23:127-133.

Kendall,  M.  W.  1974.   Acute hepatotoxic effects of mirex in the rat.
Bull. Environ. Contam.  and  Toxicol.  Vol  12(5):617.

Kricher,  J.  C.,  J. C.  Urey,  and  M.  L. Hawes.  1975.  The  effects  of
mirex and methoxychlor on the growth and productivity of  Chlorella
pyrenoidosa.   Bull.   Environm.  Contam.  Toxicol.  Vol  14(5) 617-703.

Lai, R. and  D.  M. Saxera.  1982. Accumulation, metabolism,  and
effects of organochlorine insecticides  on microorganisms.  Microbiolo-
gical Rev.   46(1).95-127.

Larson,  P. S., J.  L. Egle Jr., G. Hennigar,  and J. F. Borzelleca.
1979.  Acute and subchronic toxicity of  mirex in the  rat,  dog,  and
rabbit.   Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  49:271-277.

Lee, J.  H., J. R.  Sylvester, and C. E. Nash.  1975.  Effects of mirex
and methoxychlor on juvenile and adult striped mullet, Mugil cephalus,
L. Bull.  Environ. Contam. and Toxicol.  Vol. 14(2):  180-

Lue, K.  Y., and A. de la Cruz.  1977.  Mirex incorporation in the
environment:   toxicity  in two soil macroarthropods and effects on soil
community respiration.  Water,  Air and  Soil  Pollution.  9, 177-191.

Lue, K.  Y., and A. de la Cruz.  1978.  Mirex incorporation in the
environment:   toxicity  in hydra. Bull.  Environm.  Contam.  Toxicol.
19:412.
                                  24

-------
Ludke, J. L., M. T. Finley, and C. Lusk.  1971.  Toxicity of mirex to
crayfish, Procambarus blandingi.   Bull, of Environ.  Contain,  and
Toxicol.    6:89-96.

Mehrle,  P. M.,  F.  L. Mayer, and D. R. Buckler.  1981.  Kepone  and
mirex:  Effects on bone development and swim bladder composition in
fathead minnows.  Trans. Am.  Fish. Soc.  110:638-643.

Muncy, R. J., and  A. D. Oliver, Jr.  1963.  Toxicity  of ten insecti-
cides to the red  crawfish Procambarus  clarki  (Girard).  Trans. Am.
Fish. Soc. 92:428.

Neumeyer,  J., D. Gibbons, and H.  Trask.   1969.  Pesticides.  Parts 1
and 2, Chemical Week 104 (April  12 and 26):   37-68 (as cited in
Pimental,  1971).

NIOSH.  1978 Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.
National Institutes of  Science and Health,  p. 751.

Naqvi, S. M. and A. A. de la Cruz.  1973.  Mirex incorporation in the
environment:  Toxicity  in selected freshwater organisms.   Bull.
Environ.  Contam.  and  Toxicol.   10(5) :305-308.

Pimenthal, D.  1971.   Ecological  effects of pesticides on non-target
species.   Government Printing Office,  Washington, D.C.  858.

Roberts,  B. L.  and H. W. Dorough.  1984.  Relative toxicities  of
chemicals  to the  earthworm Eisenia foetida.   Environ. Toxicol  and
Chemistry, Vol  3,  p.  67-78.

Rogers, J. M.,  L.  Morelli, and C. T. Grabowski.   1984.  Plasma glucose
and protein concentrations in rat fetuses and neonates exposed to
cataractogenic  doses of mirex.   Environ. Res.  34:155-161.

Rogers, J. M. and C. T. Grabowski.   1983.  Mirex-induced  fetal
cataracts:  Lens growth, histology, and cation balance,  and relation-
ship  to  edema.  Teratology.   27:343-349.

Sanders,  H. 0., J. Huckins, B. T. Johnson, and D. Skaar.   1981.
Biological  effects of  kepone and mirex on freshwater invertebrates.
Arch. Environ.   Contam.  Toxicol.   10:531-539.

Skea, J.  C.,  H.  J. Simonin, S. Jackling, and J. Symula.  1981.
Accumulation and  retention of mirex by brook trout fed a contaminated
diet.  Bull. Environ.  Contam. Toxicol.   27:79-83.

Smith, M.  K., G. L.  Kimmel, D. M. Kochar, T. H. Shepard, S. P.
Spielberg  and J. G. Wilson.  1983.   A selection of candidate compounds
for in vitro teratogenesis test  validation.  Teratog. Carcinog.
Mutagen.    3:461-480.

Spencer,  E.  1973.  Guide to the chemicals used in crop protection.
Agriculture Canada, Research Branch, Ottawa,  p.  359.

                                  25

-------
Stephan,  C. E., D. I.  Mount, D. J.  Hansen, J. H.  Gentile, G. A.
Chapman,  W.  A.  Brungs,  1985.  Draft Guidelines for deriving  numerical
national water-quality criteria for the protection of aquatic orga-
nisms and their uses U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, Office  of
Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratories, Duluth,
MN.

Ulland,  B., E. K.  Weisburger and J. H. Weisburger.  1973.  Chronic
toxicity and carcinogenicity of industrial chemicals and pesticides.
Abstract.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.  25:446.

Ulland,  B., N. P. Page, R.  A. Squire, E. K. Weisburger, and R. L.
Cypher.   1977.   Carcinogenicity assay  of mirex in Charles River  CD
rats.  J. Nat'l.  Cancer Inst.  58(1):133.

U.S.  DHEW (U.S. Department of Health,  Education  and Welfare).  1980.
Experimental design status  report and individual  animal pathology
table for mirex bioassay.  Unpublished data received from Sharon
Leeney,  Technical Information Resources Branch, National  Cancer
Institute.  Computer printout  (approx.)  100 p.  (as  cited  in  U.S. EPA
1983) .

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,  1976.   Quality Criteria for
Water, EPA document No. 440/9-76-023.   Available from NTIS order No.
PB 263-943.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   1981.  Ambient  water  quality
criteria for mirex.  Final Report  (Contract No.   68-03-2902.1 by
Battelle Columbus Laboratories).  U.S.  EPA Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, Ohio.

U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   1983.  Multimedia  risk
assessment for:  Mirex — Final Draft.  Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office.

Van  Valen, C.  C., A. K. Andrews,  and L.  L. Eller.  1968.  Some effects
of mirex on two warmwater  fishes.   Trans. Am. Fish.  Soc. 97:185.

Veith, G. D.,  D. L. DeFoe, and  B. V. Bergsteat.  1979.  Measuring  and
estimating the bioconcentration factor  of mirex  in  fish.  J. Fish.
Res. Board.  Can. 36:1040 (as  cited in  U.S. EPA,  1983).

Warner,  R. W.   1974.   Water  pollution, freshwater macroinvertebrates.
J. Water Poll. Control Fed.  Vol  46(6):1341.

Waters,  E. M., J.  E. Huff, and H. B. Gerstner.  1977.   Mirex, an
overview.  Environmental Research  13, 212-222.

Whittle, D. M. and J.  D. Fitzsimons.   1983.  The influence of the
Niagra River on contaminated burdens of Lake Ontario biota.   Great
Lakes Res.   9(2):295-302.
                                  26

-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5, Library (PL-12J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 12th Floor
Chicago, iL  60604-3590

-------
Windholz, M.  (ed).   1976.  Merck Index, 9th ed.   Merck and Co., Inc.,
Rahway, NJ.  p. 807.

Wolfe, J. L.,  R.  J. Esher, K. M. Robinson, and J. D. Yarbrough.  1979,
Lethal and reproductive effects of dietary mirex  and DDT on old field
mice,  Peromyscus polionotus.  Bull. Environm.  Contain. Toxicol. 21,
397-402.

Yarbrough, J. D., J.  E. Chambers,  J. Grimley,  E. Alley,  M. Fang, J.
Morrow, B.  Ward,  and J.  Conroy.  1981.  Comparative study of 8-monohy-
dromirex and mirex toxicity in male rats.  Toxic. Appl.  Pharmac.
58:105-117.
                                  27

-------