UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
530R86109
MAR 3 I986
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: RCRA/Superfund Hotline Status Report - January 1986
FROM: Carolyn Barley, Project Officer (J
Office of Solid Waste (382-2217) L_5-<**«-*^
-------
- 2 -
i
G. On January 27, Alan Corson and Susan Bronni of OSW met with the Hotline to discuss
questions on the proposed land disposal ban and final solvent mixture regulations.
II. REGIONAL ACTIVITIES; SUPERFUND INFORMATION SERVICES
A. Region II (New York, 800-732-1223 or in New Jersey, 800-346-5009)
o Josh Bloom responded to 48 inquiries in January.
o Josh submitted a draft work plan for 1986 which outlines the operating guidelines
for the Information Service. The primary operating adjustments include more
expansive advertising, more community outreach, and support to Regional commu-
nity relations activities.
o The breakdown of calls by subject is as follows:
Radon Site - 1
Lipari Landfill - 2
CEPP - 40
KCRA - 1
CERCIA - 4
o The breakdown of callers is as follows:
Industry - 17
Public - 5
Consultants - 8
State Government - 4
Local Government - 6
Environmental Cry. - 2
Other - 6
B. Region IX (800-231-3075)
o Nancy Alvarado responded to 64 calls in January.
o Nancy participated in a week long RCRA/CERLCA training course conducted by
Hotline staff during the week of January 27-31.
o The breakdown of calls by subject is as follows:
Superfund sites - 15
CERCIA - 22
RCRA - 9
CEPP - 6
Other - 12
o The breakdown of callers is as follows:
Industry - 14
Public - 19
Consultants - 16
State Government - 3
Local Government - 7
Federal Government - 5
-------
III. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES
A. RCRA
1. Spent Solvent Mixtures
In the December 31, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR 53315), EPA amended the listing
of hazardous wastes in §261.31 to include certain spent solvent mixtures. In
this final rule, spent solvent listings F001, F002, F004, and F005 were redefined
to include mixtures containing ten percent or more total listed solvent (by
volume). However, the ten percent threshold for solvent mixtures was not applied
to the F003 solvents listed solely for ignitability because the Agency determined
that these solvents may not be ignitable at such low concentrations. Additionally,
the Agency did not remove these ignitable spent solvents from the list of hazar-
dous waste since the solvents have not been evaluated for their toxicity. How
then are mixtures of ignitable solvents regulated?
If a spent, non-halogenated solvent has been listed only for showing the
ignitability characteristic (i.e., listed as F003), then mixtures or blends
of such solvents will remain listed as F003 wastes as long as the mixture
or blend consists only of F003 listed solvents. For example, a blend of
80% ethyl acetate and 20% xylene would be classified as F003 while a blend
of 80% ethyl acetate and 20% petroleum solvents would not be F003. However,
the ethyl acetate and petroleum solvent would probably exhibit the ignita-
bility characteristic and be classified as D001. Finally if a solvent blend
consists of a solvent listed under F003 plus 10% or more of any solvent
listed under F001, F002, F004, F005, then the resultant spent mixture will
be listed as F003 and the other spent solvents (i.e., F001, F002, F004, or
F005) respectively.
Source: Jacqui Sales (202) 382-4807
2. Hazardous Waste Fuel Brokers
A waste broker makes purchase arrangements between generators and burners of
hazardous wastes fuel. Although the broker never physically possesses the waste
nor stores it on his property, he does own it temporarily and handles all billing
and invoices. The generator ships the waste directly to the burner. Is the
broker a marketer of hazardous waste fuel, even though he never possesses it?
Sections 3010(a)(3) and 3004 (q) (1) (C) of RCRA, as amended, require marketers
or distributors of hazardous waste fuel to notify the EPA of hazardous waste
fuel activities (see §266.34(b) and 50 FR 49204). Because the broker does
own the waste at one point, he is responsible for the waste fuel during the
time he owns it. Ownership, rather than physical possession, is the criterion
used in determining if one is a marketer because it is possible to possess
or handle the waste without owning it. For example, some transporters
possess a waste during transportation but do not actually own it at any time.
Therefore, the broker in this situation is a marketer or distributor of the
waste fuel and must comply with all applicable marketer requirements set
forth in §266.34 (50 FR 49204).
-------
- 4 -
3. UST Notification
Section 9002(a)^in Subtitle I of RCRA (codified in §280.3(a)) requires owners
of underground storage tanks in use on the date of enactment of the Hazardous
and Solid Waste Anendments (HSWA), which are used for the storage of regulated
substances, to notify the appropriate State or local agency of the existence
of such tanks by May 8, 1986. "Regulated substance," as defined in §9001(2) (A)
of RCRA includes those substances defined in §101(14) of CERCIA.
An owner/operator of an underground storage tank stores products containing
chlorinated solvents in his tank. The total concentration of these chlorinated
solvents within the product varies from 100 to 10,000 ppm. The chlorinated
solvents are "regulated substances." The chlorinated solvents are the only
components of these products which meet the RCRA definition of "regulated
substance." Is the owner of these underground product storage tanks required
to notify under §9002 of RCRA?
Yes; the owner is required to notify pursuant to §9002 of RCRA. At present
there are no exclusions from Subtitle I jurisdiction for tanks containing
de minimis concentrations of regulated substances. Thus, notification
of the tank must be provided, as required under §9002. Further guidance
on the extent to which such tanks will be subject to regulation under
§9003 will be given when the technical standards for underground storage
tanks are promulgated. These regulations are required by §9003 of RCRA
to be promulgated in 1987.
Source: Carrie Wehling (202) 475-8067
4. Obtaining Interim Status
A hazardous waste management facility has received a final permit, pursuant to
Section 3005 of RCRA to store and treat hazardous wastes. The facility also
has solid waste management units (SWMU) on-site. If the solid wastes in the
SWMUs become RCRA hazardous waste because EPA lists them as hazardous wastes,
can the facility obtain interim status for these newly-regulated units?
Interim status, under Section 3005(e) of RCRA, is granted to facilities.
Interim status is not granted on a unit-by-unit basis. Therefore, fully
permitted facilities may not receive interim status for newly regulated
units.
Fully permitted facilities will be allowed to treat, store, or dispose of
wastes covered by new hazardous waste listings if the owner/operator
submits an amended permit application pursuant to 40 CFR 124.5 and the
permit has been modified pursuant to 40 CFR 270.41 or 270.42.
Source: Carrie Wehling (202) 475-8067
5. Corrective Action
The Hazardous and Solid Waste Mendments of 1984 (HSWA) set forth requirements
for corrective action for continuing releases under §3004(u). This provision
is applicable to any facility that is seeking a RCRA permit.
A facility currently has a RCRA permit and is seeking a major modification
to that permit under §270.41. Would this facility be subject to the corrective
action requirements of §3004(u) when going through a major permit modification?
-------
- 5 -
Section 3004(u) states that corrective action for a facility shall be
required as a pondition of each permit issued after November 8, 1984.
Because a permit modification is not equivalent under §270.41 to the
issuance of a permit, a facility that is seeking a major modification
to a RCRA permit issued prior to November 8, 1984, is not required to
address the corrective action requirements of §3004(u). A facility
permit being reviewed for reissuance, however, is subject to the §3004(u)
corrective action provisions.
Source: Carrie Wehling (202) 475-8067
6. State Authorization Reversions
What happens to the RCRA programs for which the EPA has made tentative, but
not final, determination to award final authorization on January 31, 1986?
Under the State authorization program in Part 271, a State may apply to
have its own program authorized by the EPA to operate in lieu of the Federal
program. EPA may approve a State program only if it is equivalent to or
more stringent than the Federal program. According to Section 3006(c)(l)
of RCRA (as codified in §271.122(b)(1) (see 50 FR 28755)), a State that has
not been granted final authorization will lose any authority it has to
implement the program on January 31, 1986. The January 31, 1986, Federal
Register contains a list of States whose programs have reverted to EPA.
Because most States are actively pursuing final authorization, reversion of
RCRA authority to EPA is likely to be temporary. In cases where the reversion
will be less than 90 days, it is considered a short term reversion and EPA
will make every effort to avoid disrupting the State program during this
limited period of time. For a description of the manner in which EPA intends
to administer the program, set priorities and use its enforcement discretion
in these States, see 50 FR 48406, November 25, 1985.
Source: Marty Madison (202) 382-2210
Susan Schmedes (202) 382-7709
B. CERCLA
1. NPL Deletion Criteria
On December 31, 1985, (50 FR 53448), EPA announced its intent to delete eight
sites frcm the National Priorities List (NPL). What are the criteria used in
determining whether these sites may be deleted from the NPL?
40 CFR S300.66(c)(7) lists the criteria for deleting sites frcm the NPL. That
portion of the National Contingency Plan states that a site may be deleted
where no further response is appropriate. In making this determination, EPA
will consider whether any of the following criteria has been met: (1) respon-
sible or other parties have implemented all appropriate response actions; (2)
the appropriate CERCLA Fund financed responses have been implemented and no
further clean-up by responsible parties is appropriate; or (3) the remedial
investigation shows that the release poses no significant threat to human
health and the environment and, therefore, remedial measures are not appropriate.
-------
- 6 -
Before deleting^ any site from the NPL, ""EPA will make a determination that
the remedy or decision that no remedy is necessary is protective of public
health, welfare, and the environment considering environmental requirements
which are applicable or relevant and appropriate at the time of deletion or
recategorization," 50 FR 47932 (Nov. 20, 1985).
Source: Steve Smith (202) 382-2200
Blake Velde (202) 382-7789
Ellen Siegler (202) 382-7700
2. Fertilizer Releases
A fertilizer manufacturer wishes to dispose of fertilizer manufacturing process
waste that contains less than 0.2% of Disulfoton, a FIFRA - registered pesticide
and a CERCLA hazardous substance. The waste is actually fertilizer in a dust
form, which is not marketable. If the manufacturer disposes of this dust by
applying it to the land as a fertilizer, must he report a release of Disulfoton
under CERCLA §103(a)?
CERCLA Section 103(a) requires a person in charge of a facility from
which a hazardous substance is released in an amount equal to or in excess
of its reportable quantity to immediately notify the National Response
Center. Disulfoton was designated as a hazardous substance pursuant to
Sections 101(14)(C) and 102(a) of CERCLA with a reportable quantity of 1
lb., 50 FR 13486 (April 4, 1985). However, §101(22)(D) of CERCLA excludes
the normal application of fertilizer from the definition of. release. Thus,
the disposal of the dust would not be a reportable release under CERCLA if
such disposal constitutes "normal application of a fertilizer." In order
to be thus excluded from the definition of release, the dust must be a
fertilizer and must be in a form in which it can be usefully applied as a
fertilizer. In addition, it must be applied to the land in a manner in
which such fertilizer is normally applied and for the purpose of increasing
the fertility of the soil to which applied. If the manufacturer applied a
reportable quantity of Disulfoton (approximately 500 Ibs. of 0.2% Disul- -
foton fertilizer dust) to the land, and the dust was not effective as a
fertilizer or not applied in the manner in which such fertilizer is normally
applied, the disposal would constitute a release of a hazardous substance
and would be reportable under §103(a) of CERCLA.
Finally if for the reasons above, the disposal of fertilizer dust by appli-
cation to the land did not constitute the "normal application of fertilizer,"
such disposal would also not qualify for the exemption from §103(a) reporting
for the application of FIFRA registered pesticides, (see Section 103(e)).
This exemption only applies to the application of a pesticide in accordance
with its purpose, 50 FR 13464 (April 4, 1985)
Source: Carrie Wehling (202) 475-8067
3. Environmental Impact Statements
A Federal facility has been identified as the party responsible for a release of
a hazardous substance. If remedial activity has potential to make a significant
impact on the environment, must the facility prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS)?
-------
- 7 -
Yes; Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (42 USC 4332 (O) requires that all agencies of the Federal
Goverrment shall include in every recommendation or report on pro-
posals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly
affecting the quality of the environment, a detailed environmental
impact statement (EIS) by the responsible official addressing: (1)
the environmental impact of the proposed action; (2) any adverse
environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal
be implemented; (3) alternatives to the proposed action; (4) the
relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment
and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; and
(5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources
which would be involved in the proposed action should it be imple-
mented.
The funding of a remedial action to a discharge/release from a
Federally operated or supervised facility or vessel is the respon-
sibility of the operating or supervising agency. If a remedial
activity proposed for a Federal facility had the potential to signi-
ficantly affect the environment, then a NEPA EIS would be required.
(This conclusion is subject to change, however, depending on the
reauthorization of CERCLA by Congress). Also, note that for Fund-
financed remedial activities, an EIS is not required. In these
response activities, EPA or State agencies conduct a remedial
investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) which is functionally
equivalent to an EIS.
Source: Howard Corcoran (202) 382-5313
-------
- 8 -
IV. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS
The Hotline responded to 7,154 questions and requests for documents in January.
questions asked, the percentage of callers was:
Of the
Generators 18.8%
Transporters 1.4%
TSDF'S 7.7%
EPA HQ'S 2.4%
EPA Regions 2.9%
Federal Agencies 3.3%
local Agencies 1.6%
Breakdown of calls by EPA Regions:
1 5.5% 3 24.4%
2 11.0% 4 12.3%
International <1%
RCRA
General Information
3010 Notification
260.10 Definitions
260.22 Petitions/Delisting
261.2 Solid Waste Definition
261.3 Hazardous Waste (HW) Defn.
261-C Characteristic HW
261-D Listed HW
261.4 Exclusions
261.5 Small Quantity Generator
261.6 Recycling Standards
266-C Use Constituting Disposal'
266-D HW Burned for Energy Recovery
266-E Used Oil Burned for
Energy Recovery
266-F Precious Metal Reclamation
266-G Spent Lead-Acid Battery
Reclamation
261.7 Container Residues
262 Generator (General)
Manifest Information
Pre- transport
Accumulation
Recordkeeping & Reporting
International Shipments
263 Transporter
270 B - Permit Application
D - Changes to Permits
F - Special Permits
G - Interim Status
271 State Programs
124 Administrative Procedures
Li ab i 1 i ty/ Enforcement
Referrals
State Agencies 5.1%
Consultants 25 . 2%
Press 0.3%
Trade Associations 1.7%
Citizens 2.9%
UST 0/0 14.0%
Used Oil Handlers 8.1%
Others 4.6%
5 19.3% 7 4.0% 9
6
264
125
81
35
90
134
227
320
68
137
96
7
132
332
17
8.7% 8 4.2% 10
264/265 TSDF
A-Scope/Appl icab i 1 i ty
B-General Facility Standards
C- Preparedness/Prevention
D-Contingency Plans
E-Man i f est/Recordkeeping/Report ing
F-Groundwater Monitoring
G-Closure/Post-Closure
H-Financial Requirements
I-Containers
J-Tanks
K-Surface Impoundments
L-Waste Piles
M-Land Treatment
N-Landfills
O- Inc inerators
P-Thermal Treatment
8.4%
2.0%
86
28
7
11
12
58
28
48
13
51
29
4
7
23
29
2
Q-Chemical, Physical, Biological Treat. 4
10
19
45
37
9
45
54
10
33
38
30
15
28
57
5
33
238
R-Underground Injection
X/Y-Miscellaneous/Experimental
CERCLA
Ge neral/overv iew
Hazardous Substances/RQ
NCP
Taxes/PCLTF
Removal
Remedial
NPL
On-site Policy
Off-site Policy
CERCLIS/Notification
Liability/Enforcement
CERCLA Reauthorization
Document Requests
11
1
85
109
32
9
11
41
76
14
10
14
23
23
1666
-------
- 9 -
RCRA AMENDMENTS
General
30
Effective Dates
29
Small Quantity Generators_
Liquids in Landfills Ban
128
52
Land Disposal Restrictions
Storage of Banned Waste
109
Minimum Technology Standards
Retrofitting Surface Impoundments_
Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater Commission_
Corrective Action
Interim Status Corrective
Action Orders
Loss of Interim Status_
Permits
Exposure Assessments_
RD&D Permits
Waste Minimization
Listings/Characteristic Revision_
Delisting
25
Used oil Listing
Recycling Standards
30
52
10
24
37
246
200
Hazardous Waste Exports
Mining waste, Utility Waste &
Cement Kiln Dust 28
Uranium Mill Tailings_
State Implementation^
Subtitle D
Procurement Guidelines
Inventory of Injection Wells
Inventory of Federal Facilities_
In spec t ions
Federal Enforcement_
Citizen Suits
H.W. Underground Tanks
UST
Definitions
Notification
Interim Prohibition_
Tank Standards
0
11
0
Dioxins from Resource Recovery 1_
Domestic Sewage 3
30
174
435
40
67
-------
- 10 -
RCRA/SUPERt'UND HOTLINE
National Toll Free #800-424-9346
Washington, D.C. Metro Area #202-382-3000
V. PUBLICATIONS
RCRA
"Chart of HSWA Requirements with Statutory Deadlines." The Hotline will
take requests.
"Chemical, Physical, and Biological Properties of Compounds Present at
Hazardous Waste Sites." The Hotline will take requests.
"Directory of Chemical Waste Transporters" and "Directory of Hazardous
Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities," available from the National
Solid Waste Management Association at (202) 659-4613.
"Fate of Selected Trace Metals in the Petroleum Refining Industry."
Available from the RCRA Docket at (202) 382-4675. Copying costs are
$9.80.
"Preliminary Source Assessment for Hazardous Waste Air Emissions from
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities." Available from Kent /
Hustevedt of Research Triangle Park, N.C. at (919) 541-5671 or FTS
629-5671.
"Review of Activities of Major Firms in the Commercial Hazardous Waste
Management Industry," (OSW-00-00-894). The 1984 Update is now available.
The Hotline will take requests.
"Summary Report on RCRA Activities." Reports are issued quarterly and
monthly. To yet on the mailing list, contact the Permits/State Programs Branch
at (202) 382-4697.
CERCLA
"Compendium of Cost of Remedial TechnologiesW Hazardous Waste Sites,"
(CCRT-9/85) September 1985, available from EPA's Office of Research and x
Development at (513) 569-7876.
"Remedial Action Costing Procedures Manual," (RACP-9/85) September 1985,
available from EPA's Office of Research and Development at'(513) 569-7876.
"Sampling Strategy to Support Hazard Ranking System Scoring," draft , ';/
January 7, 1986, is available from Lucy Sibold at (202) 382-2454. >'' «
-------
- 11 -
RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES NOTICES FOR JANUARY
Former Notices With Open Comment Period as of February 1, 1986
November 21, 1985: 50 FR 48129
("Construction Quality Assurance
for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal
Facilities")
January Federal Register Notices
January 3, 1986: 51 FR 229
(public hearings for land
disposal restrictions)
January 6, 1986: 51 FR 496
(proposed "cluster" revisions
or State hazardous wastes
January 7, 1986: 51 FR 631
(tentative final authorization
for New York)
January 8, 1986: 51 FR 777
(Report to Congress on Mining
Waste; public hearings)
January 8, 1986: 51 FR 780
(correction of effective date
for off-site response action
procedures)
January 10, 1986:
(final delisting)
51 FR 1253
January 13, 1986: 51 FR 1370
(final authorization for Guam)
Notice announcing the availability of public
comment on the draft document: "Construction
Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal
Facilities". This document will help ensure
compliance with minimum technological requirements.
Available from ORD in Cincinnati. Available for
viewing at the Public Information Reference Unit
in Washington, D.C., EPA Library in Research
Triangle Park, N.C., and EPA Library in Cincinnati.
Comments are due by March 4, 1986.
Notice of public hearings in Dallas, Washington, D.C.
and Chicago for land disposal restrictions and
organic toxicity characteristic pursuant to HSWA
1984.
Proposed rule which would set up "cluster" system
for revision of State hazardous waste programs in
which States would submit program changes once a
year covering all new regulations up to same date
of previous year. Comments are due by February 5,
1986.
Notice of tentative determination for final
authorization for New York's hazardous waste
management program. Comments are due by February 11,
1986.
Notice of availability "Report to Congress on Wastes
from the Extraction and Beneficiation of Metallic
Ores, Phosphate Rock, Asbestos, Overburden from
Uranium Mining, and Oil Shale." Copies are available
from the Government Printing Office. Comments are
due by March 31, 1986. Public hearings will be held
in Tucson, Washington, D.C., and Denver.
Correction of effective date from November 6, 1985,
to June 6, 1985, for "Procedures for Planning and
Implementing Off-Site Response Actions" policy.
Final delisting granted for a sludge at a New York
facility effective January 10, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Guam's hazardous waste management program effective
January 27, 1986.
-------
- 12 -
RCRVSUPERFUND HOTLINE
January 13, 1986: 51 FR 1394
(tentative final authorization
for West Virginia)
January 14, 1986: 51 FR 1602
(proposed land disposal
restrictions)
January 15, 1986: 51 FR 1791
(final authorization for
Pennsylvania)
January 16, 1986: 51 FR 2526
(proposal to deny twenty-three
delisting petitions)
January 21, 1986: 51 FR 2702
(corrections to solvent
listings)
January 24, 1986: 51 FR 3220
(conment period extension on
proposed used oil listing and
management standards)
January 28, 1986: 51 FR 3480
(Natural Resource Damage
Assessment Documents)
January 30, 1986: 51 FR 3778
(final authorization for
Illinois)
January 30, 1986: 51 FR 3779
(final authorization for
Oregon)
January 30, 1986: 51 FR 3780
(final authorization for Rhode
Island)
January 30, 1986: 51 FR 3782
(final authorization for
Washington)
January 30, 1986: 51 FR 3783
(final authorization for
Wisconsin)
Notice of tentative determination for final
authorization for West Virginia's hazardous waste
management program. Comments are due by February 14,
1986.
Proposed rule restricting land disposal of certain
solvent and dioxin containing wastes under Part
268; proposed treatment standards and variance
and petition procedures and a system for
evaluating other land-disposed wastes. Comments
are due by March 17, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Pennsylvania's hazardous waste management program
effective January 30, ly86.
Proposal to deny twenty-three petitions for
delisting wastes based on insufficient information
in petitions. Comments are due by February 18, 1986.
Notice of corrections to solvent mixture listings
in Section 261.31, promulgated in 50 FR 53319.
Notice of extension of comment period on proposed
used oil listing and management standards to
February 11, 1986.
Notice of availability of Draft Type B Technical
Information Documents for performing natural
resources damage assessments under CERCIA. The
document is available after January 31, 1986, from
the Department of the Interior in Washington, D.C.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Illinois' hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Oregon's hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Rhode Island's hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization
for Washington's hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
Notice of final determination of authorization
for Wisconsin's hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
-------
- 13 -
RCRA/SUPERFUND HOTLINE
January 31, 1986: 51 FR 3952
(revisions to Texas hazardous
waste management program)
January 31, 1986: 51 FR 3953
(final authorization for
Indiana)
January 31, 1986: 51 FR 3954
(Part 272 codification of
State authorization)
January 31, 1986: 51 FR 4128
(reversion of State hazardous
waste management programs)
Notice of final determination on revisions to Texas'
final authorization effective October 4, 1985.
Notice of final determination of authorization for
Indiana's hazardous waste management program
effective January 31, 1986.
Establishment of Part 272 for codification of RCRA
approved state hazardous waste management programs;
codification of programs in Montana and Delaware.
Part 272 incorporates by reference the state
statutes and regulations that EPA will enforce
under Section 3008 of RCRA. Effective date is
January 31, 1986.
Notice of expiration of interim authorization for
the RCRA programs in California, Connecticut, Maine,
New York, Ohio, Puerto Rico, and West Virginia.
The EPA is responsible for the administration of
the RCRA program in these States until they become
authorized. Effective date is January 31, 1986.
-------
-14-
Martha Anderson, DORM
Frank Biros, WH-527
George Bonina, WH-563
Karen Brown, PM-220
John Bosky, EPA - Kansas City, KS
Diane Buxbaum, Region II
Eileen Claussen, WH-562
Pat Cohn, WH-527
Kathy Collier, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Peter Cook, WH-527
Alan Corson, WH-565
Elizabeth Cotsworth, WH-563
Hans Crump, WH-548B
Truett DeGeare, WH-563
Steve Dorrler, EPA - Edison, NJ
Barbara Elkus, WH-527
Tim Fields, WH-548B
Elaine Fitzback, WH-527
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
George Garland, WH-562
John Gilbert, EPA - Cincinnati, OH
lantha Gilmore, WH-562
Peter Guerrero, WH-563
Penny Hansen, WH-562
Bill Hanson, WH-548E
Betti Harris, EPA-Region VII
William Hedeman, WH-556
Lee Herwig, A-104
Hotline Staff
Warren Hull, A-104
Phil Jalbert, WH-548D
Alvin K. Joe, Jr., Geo/Resource
Jim Jowett, WH-548B
Thad Juszczak, WH-562A
Robert Knox, WH-562
Jack Kooyoomjian, WH-548B
Mike Kosakowski, WH-527
Jerry Kotas, WH-527
Walter Kovalick, WH548
Tapio Kuusinen, PM-223
Robert Landers, EMSL/LV
Carol Lawson, A-107
Steve Leifer, LE-135
Steve Levy, WH-563
Henry Longest, WH-548
Gene Lucero, WH-527
James Makris, WH-548A
Susan Mann, WH-563
Jack McGraw, WH-562A
Scott McPhilamy, Reg. Ill
Tony Montrone, WH-527
Sue Moreland (ASTSWMO)
Sam Napolitano, PM-220
Christina Parker, WH-562
Karen Reed, PM-273
John Riley, WH-548B
Clem Rastatter, WH-563
Dale Ruhter, WH-565
William Sanjour, WH-563
Susan Sawtelle, WH-562
Pam Sbar, LE-134S
Mike Shannon, WH-563
Ken Shuster, WH-565
Elaine Stanley, WH-548
Jack Stanton, WH-527
Bruce Weddle, WH-563
Steve Wilhelm, Region VII
Marcia Williams, WH-562
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
------- |