•*
r.
UN|TED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGE
V*"1^^ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
*«,,
DEC 8,987 530R87109
"JFFiCf. Or-
SOLI'O WASTE a.NO EME,MGl_."i_-Y RESPONSE
SUBJECT: Final Monthly Report - RCRA/Superfund Industry
Assistance Hotline Report for September 1987
/w^-
FROM: Thea McManus
Office of Solid Waste (WH-562)
Hubert Matters, office of Emergency
and Remedial Response (WH-548B)
TO: See list of addressees
This report is prepared and submitted for EPA Contract
No. 68-01-7371.
I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES - September 1987
A. RCRA PROGRAM
1. Subtitle D Programs on Indian Lands
Under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, States developed programs according to
Federal guidelines for regulation of non-hazardous solid
waste. In 40 CFR Parts 240 to 257, EPA established
guidelines for solid waste management. What solid waste
disposal criteria apply to sanitary landfills on Indian
lands? Will those criteria change when the new
regulations for municipal landfills are published?
Because State authority generally does not extend
to Indian lands, State Subtitle D standards do not
apply to sanitary landfills on Indian lands.
However, the Federal solid waste disposal criteria
apply to sanitary landfills on tribal lands
directly. Therefore, Indian lands must follow the
guidelines established in 40 CFR Part 257 for solid
waste management.
-------
1. Subtitle D Programs on Indian Lands (Continued)
EPA plans to publish proposed regulations for
municipal landfills in the Federal Register in the
near future. In developing the proposed
ruleraaking, EPA is examining options for exempting
Indian tribes from certain requirements.
Source: Allen Maples (202) 382-4683
Research: Jennifer Planert
2. Certification of Closure
The owner/operator of a hazardous waste management unit
is conducting closure and hires a contractor to certify
the closure. 40 CFR 264/265.115 state that
certification of closure must be made by an independent,
registered, professional engineer. Can the engineer who
is employed by the contractor performing the closure,
certify the closure of the facility?
Yes, the "RCRA Guidance Manual for Subpart G
Closure and Post-Closure Care Standards and Subpart
H Cost Estimating Requirements" clarifies that an
"independent" engineer cannot be directly employed
by the owner or operator of the unit. Also, the
May 2, 1986 Federal Register (51 FR 16433) states
that, "... the certification should be made by a
person who is least subject to conscious or
subconscious pressures to certify to the adequacy
of a closure that in fact is not in accordance with
the approved closure plan."
Source: Sharon Frey (202) 475-6725
Research: Chris Bryant
3. Waste Identification
A company generates aerosol paint and solvent cans from
painting and cleaning operations. The cans are empty as
per common industry practices used to empty such devices
to less than 3% by weight of the total capacity of the
container (40 CFR 261.7(b)(1(i) & (iii)). The cans may
still contain propellant, making the cans reactive if
put in contact with a strong initiating force (i.e.,
intense pressure or heat). Since for all practicable
purposes the cans are free of contents that might have
been hazardous wastes, would this be regulation of the
aerosol cans themselves? RIL #43 specifically excluded
the regulation of the cans, and solely addressed only
the potentially hazardous contents. Therefore, would
aerosol cans free of hazardous waste, but still
potentially reactive because of contained propellant be
regulated as hazardous waste?
-2-
-------
3. Waste Identification (Continued)
Irrespective of the lack of contained waste, the
aerosol cans would be a RCRA hazardous waste
because they demonstrate the hazardous
characteristic of reactivity (40 CFR 261.23(a)(6)).
Source: Mike Petruska (202) 475-6676
Research: Andy O'Hare
4. Treatment of Infectious Waste
There is growing national concern over proper infectious
waste management. What are some of the treatment
methods currently used for infectious wastes?
Although RCRA section 1004 includes wastes with
infectious characteristics in the definition of
hazardous waste, there are presently no Federal
regulations for management of infectious waste
under RCRA Subtitle C. Instead, regulation of
infectious waste has been left up to the States'
discretion. EPA has, however, issued a guidance
manual entitled EPA Guidance for Infectious Waste
Management (May 1986), available through NTIS
(publication number PB-86-199130) which describes
numerous methods for effective treatment of
infectious waste. Many treatment methods employ
some form of heat or chemical sterilization.
Steam sterilization uses steam at a temperature
high enough to kill infectious agents in
combination with pressurization in a vessel such as
a steam sterilizer, autoclave, or retort. Steam
sterilization is an effective treatment method for
low-density wastes such as plastics. A method that
can be used for most types of infectious waste is
incineration. Incineration converts combustible
wastes into a noncombustible ash while combustion
gases are vented to the atmosphere. A third type
of heat-related treatment is thermal inactivation.
For liquid wastes, thermal inactivation heats the
waste at a set temperature for a designated period
of time. Solids may be chemically inactivated by
heating them in an oven, typically at 320 degrees
to 380 degrees Fahrenheit for two to four hours.
Chemical treatment methods include gas/vapor
sterilization and chemical disinfection. In
gas/vapor sterilization, the infectious waste is
fumigated with a gaseous or vaporized chemical such
as ethylene oxide or formaldehyde. Chemical
disinfection (the name is self-explanatory) is
effective for liquid wastes but may also be used
for solid wastes.
-3-
-------
A technology that may be used in the future is
sterilization by irradiation. Ionizing radiation
has already been used to sterilize other materials
such as food and medical supplies.
Source: Jacqui Sales (202)475-8933
Research: Jennifer B. Planert
5. Land Disposal Restrictions - Haloqenated Organic Carbons
An F001/F002 waste subject to the November 7, 1986
Federal Register land disposal restrictions meets the
criteria for the 1% national variance specified in
Section 268.30. In the July 8, 1987 Federal Register,
treatment standards were set for most HOCs. F001 and
F002 wastes are also HOCs. Would the F001/F002
wastestream be subject to the newly-promulgated HOC
treatment standards even though it has been granted a
two-year variance F005 solvent wastes?
The solvent would only be subject to the treatment
standards and effective date in the November 7,
1986 rule. In 52 FR 25762, it says that "where
treatment standards and prohibition effective dates
are promulgated for California list waste
constituents that are also covered under the
November 7, 1986 rule, the treatment standards and
effective dates from the prior rule apply."
The general rule is that where a constituent is
subject to more than one treatment standard, the
treatment standard (and effective date) for the
more specific constituent applies. Example: the
F001-F005 treatment standard/effective date
presides because, as a subset of the HOCs, it is
more specific.
Also, for a waste where two or more treatment
standards apply because of different constituents
(e.g., F001 and Lead), both would apply with
respective effective dates. In the case above
mixed with lead, the F001/F002 treatment standards
and effective date would apply for the solvent
constituents (rather than the HOC standard) and
would get a variance until 11/8/88. However, the
lead would be subject to the requirements effective
7/8/87.
Source: Mitch Kidwell (202) 382-4770
Research: Mark Janaskie
-4-
-------
6. SW-846 Test Method 3060
Why was Method 3060, for alkaline digestion to
hexavalent chromium, dropped from the third edition of
EPA's "Test Method for Evaluating Solid Waste?" Is
there a replacement method?
The SW-846 Test Method #3060 is used to determine
the total concentration of hexavalent chromium in
solid waste. It uses a basic digestion of the
waste sample to solubilize both water-insoluble and
water-soluble hexavalent chromium compounds.
Method 3060 was dropped from the third edition of
the SW-846 Manual because it yielded inconsistent
results from sample to sample within the same
matrix and from matrix to matrix. The method also
provides the analyst with no way of distinguishing
when it would or would not work.
An evaluation study of Method 3060 indicates that
not only is it possible to oxidize Cr*3 to Cr*6,
but that Cr*6 can be reduced to Cr""3 during
digestion. In fact, there is more likelihood that
Cr*6 is reduced than Cr*3 oxidized. Also during
the digestion, precipitates are formed which can
present problems.
It may be appropriate to continue using Method
3060, provided the user can demonstrate that it
works by doing spike recoveries. At this time EPA
does not have a current or expected replacement
method for Method 3060.
Source: Denise Zabinski (202) 382-7458
Research: Joe Nixon
7. Land Disposal Restrictions - California List
A manufacturer produces an aqueous waste stream
containing 250 mg/1 nickel, 1600 mg/1 free cyanides, and
650 mg/1 chromium (VI) at a rate of approximately 5000
gallons/month. The waste stream is characteristically
hazardous due to the presence of free cyanides and
chromium (VI) (D003 and D007, per 40 CFR Section 261.23-
24). The manufacturer has the waste shipped via tank
truck to a commercial wastewater treatment facility that
treats the wastewater in tanks. The wastewater
treatment facility has a contract with a metals recovery
firm to accept the sludges after treatment for
reclamation.
a) In addition to normal manifesting requirements, what
must the manufacturer do in order to comply with the
land disposal restrictions for his off-site waste
shipments?
-5-
-------
7. Land Disposal Restrictions - California List (Continued)
b) If the manufacturer has a wastewater treatment facility
constructed and, as a result, will be discharging the
liquid portion of his waste under a NPDES permit and
shipping his non-liquid sludges to a metals recovery
facility, how will the off-site shipment of the sludge
be regulated?
a) The manufacturer's aqueous waste stream is
restricted from land disposal according to Sections
3004(d)(2)(A), (b)(iii), and (B)(vi) of RCRA, which
prohibit the land disposal of liquid hazardous
wastes containing greater than 1000 mg/1 free
cyanides, 500 mg/1 chromium (VI), and 134 mg/1
nickel. Consequently, the off-site shipment of his
aqueous waste stream must be accompanied by a
notification to the treatment facility of the
applicable prohibitions in Section 3004(d) of RCRA,
per 40 CFR 268.7(a)(l). The notice must include
the following information:
(i) EPA Hazardous Waste Number;
(ii) The corresponding treatment standards and
all applicable prohibitions set forth in
Section 268.32 or RCRA Section 3004(c);
(iii) The manifest number associated with the
shipment of waste; and
(iv) Waste analysis data, where available.
b) If the manufacturer's wastewater treatment
sludge is hazardous only because of
characteristics, as identified in 40 CFR 261
Subpart C, and the sludge is sent to a facility
which reclaims metals from the sludge, the sludge
is no longer subject to the land disposal
restrictions of 40 CFR Part 268. 40 CFR 260.10
defines a sludge as "any solid, semi-solid, or
liquid waste generated from a municipal, commercial
or industrial wastewater treatment plant, water
supply treatment plan, or air pollution control
facility exclusive of the treated effluent from a
wastewater treatment plant." According to 40 CFR
261.2, a sludge which exhibits a characteristic of
a hazardous waste is not a solid waste (and
therefore not a hazardous waste, per 40 CFR 261.3)
if it is to be sent for reclamation. Pursuant to
40 CFR 268.l(a), the land disposal restrictions of
40 CFR Part 268 apply specifically to hazardous
wastes. Consequently, if the waste is not a
hazardous waste under RCRA, the regulations of 40
CFR 268 do not apply.
Source: Matt Straus (202) 475-8551
Mitch Kidwell (202) 382-4805
Research: Kris Andersen
-6-
-------
8. Land Disposal Restrictions - Corrosive Waste
A manufacturer generates an acidic aqueous hazardous
waste stream (D002, per 40 CFR 26.122(a)) with a pH of
1.8 in his production process. The waste is piped from
the production area to an acid neutralization tank,
where the pH is raised to an average of 3.0. After
treatment, the waste stream is shipped off-site to a
commercial wastewater treatment plant where it is
neutralized further and then discharged under a NPDES
permit. Must the manufacturer comply with the
requirement of 40 CFR 268.7(a)(2) to certify that the
restricted waste may be land disposed without further
treatment when he ships the waste off-site?
No. If the waste stream was hazardous solely for
the characteristic of corrosivity (40 CFR
261.22(a)) and after treatment it does not exhibit
any characteristic of a hazardous waste, as
described in Subpart C of Part 261, the waste is no
longer a hazardous waste (40 CFR 261.3(d)(1)).
According to the applicability provisions set forth
in 40 CFR 268.l(a), "This part identifies hazardous
wastes that are restricted from land disposal and
defines those limited circumstances under which an
otherwise prohibited waste may continue to be land
disposed." Consequently, if the waste cannot be
identified as a hazardous waste under RCRA, then
the regulations of Part 268 do not apply, including
the certification requirement of 40 CFR
268.7(a)(2).
Source: Mitch Kidwell (202) 382-4805
Research: Kris Andersen
B. Superfund
9. Re-Opener Clause in Covenants Not to Sue
EPA published a policy memorandum in the July 27, 1987
Federal Register (52 FR 28038) concerning covenants not
to sue. The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) of 1986 provides for covenants not to sue
under Section 122(£). According to this provision, EPA
may issue covenants not to sue for CERCLA liability,
including future liability, in settlement of some CERCLA
cases. One goal behind this provision is to encourage
timely settlements between responsible parties and EPA.
SARA Section 122(f)(3) requires that EPA certify that a
remedial action is complete in order for a covenant not
-7-
-------
Re-Opener Clause in Covenants Not to Sue (Continued)
to sue for future liability to be effective. If EPA
issues a covenant not to sue for future liability to a
settling party, but the remedy at the site subsequently
fails or additional problems arise at the site, does the
covenant not to sue remain in effect?
The covenant not to sue would not remain in effect
in these cases according to the policy set forth in
the July 27, 1987 Federal Register. SARA Section
122(£)(6)(A) explicitly requires the EPA to include
a "re-opener" clause in the covenant in the event
that problems arise from conditions at the site
that were unknown at the time EPA certified
complete remedial action. In addition, Section
122(f)(6)(C) allows EPA to include a condition in
covenants not to sue, allowing for future
enforcement actions under Section 106 or Section
107 to ensure protection of public health and the
environment.
In its July 27, 1987 policy, EPA interprets Section
122(f)(6)(C) as authorizing a "re-opener" in the
covenant to address liability in the case of remedy
failure, i.e., the remedy fails to protect public
health and the environment. (See 52 FR 28041 and
28042.)
EPA may forego the reopener clause for future
liability in three situations. Under Section
122(f)(6)(B), EPA may waive the unknown conditions
re-opener if extraordinary circumstances exist and
the settlement agreement provides reasonable
assurance that public health and the environment
will still be protected. In addition, Section
122(£)(2) provides for special covenants not to sue
for future liability if: (1) EPA requires off-site
disposal after rejecting a proposed on-site remedy
that is consistent with the NCP, or (2) the chosen
remedy includes complete destruction, elimination
or permanent immobilization of the hazardous
substances so that they present no foreseeable
future risk to health and the environment.
Source: Jon Fleuchas (202) 382-3077
Research: Jennifer Planert
10. Hazard Ranking System
How are "facility," "site," "unit," and "release,"
defined under CERCLA? Which of the above mentioned
areas is characterized when applying the Hazard Ranking
-8-
-------
10. Hazard Ranking System (Continued)
System (HRS) to determine whether that area is eligible
to be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL)?
The term "facility" is defined in CERCLA Section
101(9) and in the National Contingency Plan (NCP)
at 40 CFR 300.6 as "any building, structure,
installation, equipment, pipe or pipeline
(including any pipe into a sewer or publicly owned
treatment works), well, pit, pond, lagoon,
impoundment, ditch, landfill, storage container,
motor vehicle, rolling stock, or aircraft, or any
site or area where a hazardous substance has been
deposited, stored, disposed of, or placed, or
otherwise come to be located; but does not include
any consumer product in consumer use or any vessel"
(emphasis added). Release is defined in CERCLA
Section 101(22) and codified at 40 CFR 300.6 as
including "any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring,
emitting, emptying, discharging, injection,
escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the
environment." There are no statutory or regulatory
definitions of either "site" or "unit" under
CERCLA. The term "site" is a generic term that is
often used when referring to the area or location
at which there has been a release, and which is
undergoing some type of a Superfund response
action. Generally a "site and a "facility" refer
to the same area. Although "unit" is not
specifically defined under CERCLA, the use of this
term commonly carries a meaning equivalent to the
RCRA term "hazardous waste management unit" (HWMU)
which is defined in 40 CFR 260.10 as "a contiguous
area of land on or in which hazardous waste is
placed, or the largest area in which there is
significant likelihood of mixing hazardous waste
constituents in the same area. Examples of HWMUs
included a surface impoundment, a waste pile, a
land treatment area, a landfill cell, an
incinerator, a tank and its associated piping and
underlying containment system and a container
storage area. A container alone does not
constitute a unit; the unit includes containers and
the land or pad upon which they are placed."
Section 105(a)(8)(A) of CERCLA requires that EPA
develop a system for "determining priorities among
releases or threatened releases" and that system
"shall be based on relative risk of danger to
public health or welfare or the environment...
taking into account... the population at risk, the
sensitive ecosystems... and other appropriate
factors" (emphasis added). Appendix A to 40 CFR
-9-
-------
10. Hazard Ranking System (Continued)
Part 300 contains EPA's User's Manual for the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS). The introduction
describes an HRS that is to be used in "evaluating
the relative potential of uncontrolled hazardous
substance facilities to cause health or safety
problems, or ecological or environmental damage."
BaSed on these statutory and regulatory discussions
one may infer that "facility" and "release" are
very broad definitions and are used almost
interchangeably when applying the HRS and when
conducting any subsequent response action. When
EPA investigates an area and is gathering all
relevant information to determine the relative risk
for danger that is present, it is the "release,"
which can be synonymous with "facility," which is
characterized and addressed for the purposes of
applying the HRS. There is no discussion in
Section 105 of a "site" or a "unit for the purposes
of determining a potential NPL identification.
Boundaries are not definitively drawn at the time
of the HRS scoring or NPL promulgation, but are
further defined at a later time, usually during the
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
phase. Section 104(d)(4) of CERCLA allows EPA to
treat two or more non-contiguous facilities as one
for the purposes of response actions if the
facilities are "reasonably related on the basis of
geography, or on the basis of threat, or potential
threat to the public health or welfare or the
environment." Since listing is for the purpose of
prioritizing potential response actions, Section
104(d)(4) extends to the listing of sites as well.
The September 8, 1983 Federal Register (48 FR
40663) states that in most circumstances sites will
be scored and listed on the NPL individually,
because this approach more accurately represents
the hazards and potential hazards present at the
site. The criteria that EPA evaluates when
determining whether to list two or more sites
together include: (1) whether they were part of the
same operation, (2) whether the contamination from
the sites are threatening the same ground or
surface water resource, and (3) the distance
between the non-contiguous sites and whether the
target population is essentially the same (40 FR
40663). Listing similar sites separately does not
preclude EPA from approaching the remedial
activities of non-contiguous sites as one, or from
addressing individual units at one NPL site with
different actions where it is more appropriate or
beneficial.
Source: Suzanne Wells (202) 475-8103
Research: Deborah McKie
-10-
-------
II. ACTIVITIES - September 1987
A. The RCRA/Superfund and CEPP Hotlines responded to
14,100 questions and requests for documents in
September. The breakdown is as follows:
RCRA Superfund UST CEPP
Information Calls 5913 1435 659 1979 =
Call Document Requests 907 95 395 719 =
Written Document Requests 207 456
Referrals 1208 127 =
8,235 1,530 1,054 3,281 =
B. On September 1, Kim Jennings of the CEPP Hotline
attended the Title III Workgroup meeting on the Status
of Title III activities.
C. On September 2, Joe Nixon and Laurie Huber of the
RCRA/Superfund Hotline briefed the Hotline staff on an
underground storage tank and piping field trip.
D. On September 1, 8, 15,-22, and 29; the CEPP Hotline
attended the weekly Preparedness staff meetings.
E. On September 11 and 25, Robert Costa of the CEPP
Hotline attended the Preparedness Staff Conference Call
with the FEMA/EPA Regional Preparedness Coordinators on
Status of Regional Title III activities.
F. On September 14 and 15, Laurie Huber of the
RCRA/Superfund Hotline briefed the UST staff on Hotline
functions and activities.
G. On September 14 and 15, the CEPP Hotline staff attended
the RRT Co-Chairs meeting.
H. On September 15, Robert Costa of the CEPP Hotline
attended the Title III Workgroup meeting on the status
of Title III activities.
I. On September 22, Jennifer Planert of the RCRA/Superfund
Hotline attended a Federal Facilities Workshop meeting.
J. On September 29, Kim Jennings of the CEPP Hotline
attended the Title III Workgroup meeting on the status
of Title III activities.
-11-
-------
11,. AJNALYbtb ut ULhbLLONb - September 1987
SUMMARY OF CALLS BY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION (EPA
1 52 3 26. 32 5
2 11. % 4 12.02 6
INTERNATIONAL CALLS: 0.1%
Manufacturers 7.02 State Agencies
Generators 15. OZ Local Agencies
Transporters 1.12 Used Oil Handlers
TSDF's 7.6Z UST 0/0
EPA BO 3.02 Consultants
EPA Regions 3.02 Attorneys
Federal Agencies 2.02 Laboratories
RCRA
General Information 542
301U Notification 79
260.10 Definitions 84
260.22 Petitions/Delisting 47
261.2 Solid Waste Definition 135
261.3 Hazardous Waste Definition 232
261 C Characteristic HW 423
261 D Listed HW 520
261.4 Exclusions 157
261.5 Small Quantity Generators 133
261.6 Recycling Standards 108
261.7 Container Residues 35
266 C Use Constituting Disposal 9
266 D HW Burned for Energy Recovery 74
266 E Used Oil Burned for
Energy Recovery 104
266 F Precious Metal Reclamation 18
266 G Spent Lead-Acid Battery
Reclamation 15
9 £ *) /-«_...__.*.-_ _ /•*-»_ _ _ — 1 1 CO
zo^ (jen era tor — ueneral 1OJ
100-1000 kg/mo 80
Manifest Info 85
Accumulation 81
Recordkeeping 4 Asportlng 25
International Shipments 10
263 Transporter 4$
Subtitle D 132
Used Oil - General " 65
Household Hazardous Waste 25
Dioxina 34
Mixed Radioactive Waste 41
Minimum Technology 41
Infectious Waste 28
Liability/Enforcement 110
Corrective Action 76
Waste Minimization 27
Asbestos/PCBs/Radon 68
REGIONS):
202 7 3.12 9
7.32 8 6.02 10
4.62 Universities/Researchers
1.22 Trade Associations
1.02 Insurance Co
5.32 Environmental Groups
29.42 Press
6.82 Citizens
2.42 Other
264/265 TSDP
A - Scope /Applicability
B - General Facility Standard*
C - Preparedness /Prevent ion
u - contingency Plans
E - Manifest/Recordkeeping/Reporting_
F - Ground Water Monitoring
G - Closure/Post Closure
H - Financial Requirements
I - Containers
J - Tanks
K - Surface Impoundments
L - Waste Piles
M - Land Treatment
N - Landfills
Liquids in Landfills
0 - Incinerators
P - Thermal Treatment
Q - Chem, Phys, Biol Treatment
R - Underground Injection
X - Miscellaneous
268 - Solvents & Dioxlns
California List Wastes
Scheduled Thirds
General
269 - Air Emission Standards
A - General
B - Permit Application
D - Changes to Permits
F - Special Permits'
G - Interim Status/LOIS
271 - State Programs
124 - Administrative Procedures
DOT Requirements
OSHA Requirements /HW Technologies
Test Met hods /HW Technologies
RCRA Document Requests
SUBTOTAL *
7.52
2.02
120
42
8
14
53
147
115
34
42
194
68
8
3
46
39
66
7
2
9
14
155
140
15
97
18
63
40
27
28
47
122
6
86
45
138
907
6820
1.92
1.02
0.22
0.82
0.72
3.42
2.32
-12-
-------
L^D-KGSDL-ND STORAGE TANKS
'Gen e ra 1
280.10 Applicability
280.11 Interim Prohibition
280.12 Definitions - General
UST
Regulated Substance
280 B New UST Systems - General
280.20 Performance Standards
280.21 Upgrading
280.22 Notification
280 C General Operating
Requirements
280 D Release Detection
280 E Release Reporting and
Investigation
280 F Corrective Action -
Petroleum
280 G Corrective Action -
Hazardous Substances
280 H Out-of-Service/Closure
280 I Financial Responsibility
281 State UST Programs
Liability
Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
Other Provision
UST DOC REQ.
SUBTOTAL
Referrals - EPA - HQ
- Regions
- State
- GPO/NTIS/PIC/
ORD /Dockets
- Other
- SUBTOTAL
Requests responded to by Hotline
Referred to EPA Prograa Offices
Referred to other Federal Agencies
Referred externally ( states » organizat
Response Fora Sent
Response Form Sent/FOIA
Form Letter Sent /Need more info
Requests filled - RCRA
- CEBCLA
- UST
SUBTOTAL
168
54
40
20
47
32
9
20
11
37
8
37
20
25
8
58
27
14
6
5
6
7
395
* 1054
267
117
133
390
301
* 1208
:ion, etc)
C E RC LA
General
SARA General
Access & Information Gathering
Allocations from Fund/
Fund Balancing/Grants
CERCLIS/5103 Notification
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Standards/ARARs/
How Clean Is Clean
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts/Contract Lab Program
Exposure Assessment/
Public Health Evaluation
Definitions
Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Hazardous Subs tan ces/RQs
HRS
Liability /PRPs
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages
NBARs
NCP
NPL
Off-Site Policy
On- Site Policy
PA/SI
Radon
RD/RA
Remedial
Remova 1
RI/FS
HDDs /C lean-Up Costs
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
Taxes
Title IH/Rlght-To-Know
Other Provisions
CERCLA DOC REQ.
CEBCLA SUBTOTAL
126
8
12
1
-
-
-
31
10
19
* 207
lUb
58
13
13
67
4
85
13
48
34
18
34
12
243
26
69
2
5
9
41
128
22
6
8
2
3
40
16
27
41
45
23
9
9
136
11
95
* 1530
Written Responses: Total 92
-13-
-------
CEPP Hotline
Daily/Monthly Summary Report
For SEPTEMBER 1987
Total Calls: 3281
Distribution of Calls by EPA Regions;
1_ 6.6Z 3 15.9Z
2
9
11.22
8.1Z
4_
10
International
0.2Z
Caller*;
Manufacturers
Distributors
Handlers
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/Acadenia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
15.2Z
1.6Z
49.
1.3Z
7.9Z
6.0Z
9.2Z
1.8Z
1.81
l.OZ
1.4Z
0.1Z
0.4Z
Written Requests; 456
25.4Z
7.5Z
Unknown
1.9Z
State Agencies
Fire Oepts.
EPA
Local Officials
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
On ion /Labor
Citizens
Other
3.5Z
2.2Z
4.9Z
2.1Z
2.1Z
4.0Z
0.8Z
1.3Z
0.8Z
0.1Z
l.SZ
1.1Z
Title III: General
556
S301-3 Emergency Planning: 223
SERC's
Notification Requirements
TPQ's
Sec. 305 Training Grants
Sec. 305 Emergency Bevxcv
Mixtures
Extremely flaz. Substance*
201
63
18
37
248
65
Release Notification; General 80
Notification Requirements __
Reportable Quantities _
R Q's vs. TPQ's
24
13
CEKLA vs. Sec. 304 46_
Transportation 18
Exemptions 32
-14-
-------
-'-'""' "•"—iifcillifllttl
CEPP Hotline Daily/Monthly Summary Report (Continued)
Ic_5__3_l_iy_31_2_: General
SD3 Reporting Regulations
Ie- I/IC Regulatoins
hresholds
.ec»_3_l.3..:'H General
'hresholds
ublic Maetings
ass Balance Study
rads Secrets
inforcement
!EPP: Interim Guidance
Tech» Guidance
Inemical Profiles
;RT - i
itle III Workshops
ther
Jo_c_u_me_n_t_
f of Docunents R-equVated
fef er __
)TS (Section 313) _____ 2_8
)SHA « . . r 4fe,
_98.2
_815_
_209.
22,
HazA Categories 3_09_
Mixtures 117
Exemptions 158
0
55
719"
1473
'reparedness S'tarff 0^
RCRA/Superfund Hotline_
nil EPA •'' ":
Other
41
_JL
12
-15-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
IV. PUBLICATIONS - September 1987
RCRA
"Summary of Appropriate Analytical Methods for Appendix IX;
Parts I and II," is available from the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS). The number is PB87-230-371. The
cost is $48.95 for paper copy and $6.50 for microfiche.
NTIS's telephone number is (703) 487-4860.
"Siting Guidelines for Disposal of Mixed Waste," EPA/530-SW-
029, is available by calling the Hotline.
"Guidance on Conceptual Design Approval for Commercial Low-
Level Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Disposal FAcilities,"
EPA/530-SW-87-027, is available by calling the Hotline.
"Implementation Strategy to Accompany the Proposed Rule for
Burning of Hazardous Waste Fuels," OSW #9494.00-1, is
available for viewing at the RCRA Docket.
"Guidance for POTW's Directly Receiving Hazardous Waste,"
dated July 21, 1987, is available by calling Paul Connor at
(202) 475-7718 or at regional offices.
"Proceedings of the First Annual EPA Symposium on Solid Waste
Testing and Quality Assurance," July 13-17, 1987, is
available by calling Dan Hansen at the American Public Works
Association.
"Final Guidance on the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Techniques in Enforcement Actions," August 14, 1987, is
available from the Public Information Center (PIC).
The following documents are available from the Office of
Groundwater Protection, (202) 382-7077:
"State and Territory Groundwater Classification Systems".
"Survey of State Groundwater Quality Protection Legislation,"
1985.
"EPA Activities Related to Source of Groundwater
Contamination".
"Groundwater Data Management with STORET".
-16-
-------
IV. PUBLICATIONS (Continued)
CERCLA
"Superfund Risk Assessment Information Directory," is
available from the Public Information Center (PIC).
"RI/FS Improvement Analysis Manual," July 1987 is available
for viewing at the Superfund Docket and at the Regional
offices.
"PRP Search Manual," is available at the National Technical
Information Service (NTIS). The number is PB 87-2324-76.
NTIS's telephone number is (703) 487-4860.
"The memo entitled "Entry and Continued Access under SARA,"
dated June 5, 1986, is available by calling John Fleuchas at
(202) 382-3109.
"Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook," OSWER
Directive #9230.0-3A (March 1986) is available by writing to
OERR.
The memo entitled "Superfund Project Execution," dated August
1987, is available at the Public Information Center (PIC).
"Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods," OSWER
Directive #9355.0-14 (EPA/540-P-87/001A) is available from
ORD in Cincinnati. Their telephone number is (513) 569-7562.
-17-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
V. FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - September 1987
Former Notices with Open Comment Period
July 6, 1987; 52 FR 25255
(proposed rule-administra-
tive enforcement actions
in the UST program)
July 20, 1987; 52 FR 27226
(proposed deletion of
substance from Title III
Section 313 List of Toxic
Substances)
July 20, 1987; 52 FR 27257
(notice of draft updated
assessments for trichloro-
ethylene and
dichloromethane)
July 22, 1987; 52 FR 27579
(notice of availability
of guidance manual)
August 4, 1987; 52 FR 28866
(extension of NBARs comment
period)
August 5, 1987; 52 FR 29060
(notice of Science Advisory
Board meeting on HRS)
August 10, 1987; 52 FR 29620
(OSHA hazardous waste
operations and emergency
response)
Proposed rule to extend the
applicability of the consolidated
rules of practice (40 CFR 22) which
govern administrative enforcement
actions taken pursuant to Section
9006, SDWA, as amended. Comments will
be accepted until September 4, 1986.
Proposed rule deleting butyl benzyl
phthalate from the list of toxic
chemicals under Section 313 of Title
III of SARA. Comments will be
accepted until October 19, 1987.
Notice of availability of three
documents for external review. The
documents address addenda to the
health assessments for trichloro-
ethylene and dichloromethane and new
methods regarding dichloromethane.
Comments will be accepted until
September 9, 1987.
Notice of availability of Alternate
Concentration Limit Guidance; Policy
and
Information
Requirements.
Comments will be
September 21, 1987.
accepted until
Notice of extended public comment
period concerning the Interim
Guidelines on Nonbinding Preliminary
Allocations of Responsibility (NEAR)
to September 3, 1987.
Notice of Science Advisory Board
meeting concerning revisions of the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS). The
meeting will be held September 14 and
15, 1987 in Washington, D.C.
Notice of proposed rulemaking by OSHA
on hazardous waste operations and
emergency response. Comments will be
received on or before October 5, 1987.
-18-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
August 11, 1987; 52 FR 29708
(extension of comment period)
August 12, 1987; 52 FR 29992
(notice of data, request for
comment)
August 14, 1987; 52 FR 30570
(proposed rule changes to
interim status and permitted
facilities and post-closure
permits)
Response to petition on mobile
treatment units. Comment period on
regulatory exclusion portion of the
rule extended to September 3, 1987.
Notice of data availability and
request for comments, Land Disposal
Restrictions on waste containing
prohibition levels of California List
metals and cyanide. Comments will be
accepted on or before October 13,
1987,
Proposed rule regarding changes to
interim status and permitted
facilities, and procedures for post-
closure permitting. Comments will be
accepted on or before October 13,
1987.
August 24, 1987; 52 FR 31948
(proposed rule regarding
statistical methods for
ground-water data analysis)
August 27, 1987; 52 FR 32446
(land disposal restrictions
for underground injection
wells)
August 27, 1987; 52 FR 32496
(notice of ARAR guidance)
Proposed rule for changing the
statistical analysis method used in
determining statistically significant
changes in levels of hazardous
constituents measured in ground-water
samples. Comments will be accepted on
or before October 23, 1987.
Proposed rule implementing underground
injection restrictions of certain
hazardous waste, and land disposal
restrictions technical requirement for
Class I hazardous waste injection
wells. Comments will be accepted on
or before October 26, 1987, and a
public hearing will be held September
21, 1987 in Washington, D.C.
Notice of interim guidance on
compliance with applicable or relevant
and appropriate requirements.
Comments will be accepted until
October 13, 1987.
-19-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
September 2, 1987; 52 FR
33284 (comment period
extension on De Minimis
settlement interim
guidance)
September 9, 1987; 52 FR
33960 (comment period
extension on RCRA admin-
istrative enforcement
orders under Section
3008(h))
September 29, 1987; 52 FR
36461 (comment period on
covenants not to sue)
Notice of extending the comment period
on the "Interim Guidance on
Settlements with De Minimis Waste
Contributors" under Section 122(g) of
SARA. The interim guidance was
published on June 30, 1987 (52 FR
24333). Comments will be accepted
until September 30, 1987.
Notice extending the comment period on
August 6, 1987, proposed rule on the
issuance of and Administrative
Hearings on RCRA Section 3008(h)
corrective action orders. Comments
will be accepted until September 22,
1987.
Notice extending the comment period on
the interim guidance governing the
issuance of covenants not to sue under
Section 122(f) of SARA. The interim
guidance was published on the July 27,
1987 (52 FR 28038). Comments will be
accepted until October 30, 1987.
September Federal Register Notices
September 2, 1987; 52 FR
33284 (extension of comment
period)
September 3, 1987; 52 FR
33439 (proposed delistings)
September 3, 1987; 52 FR
33446 (notice of intent to
delete sites)
Extension of public comment period on
the Interim Guidance on Settlements
with De Minimis Waste Contributors.
Comments will be accepted until
September 30, 1987.
Proposed rule to delist waste streams
from Syntex Agribusiness, St. Louis,
MO. Comments will be accepted until
October 5, 1987.
Notice of intent to delete three sites
from the National Priorities List and
request for comments. The sites are
the Middletown Road Dump, Annapolis,
MD, Harris (Farley Street), Houston,
TX, and Mountain View Mobile Home
Estates, Globe, AZ. Comments will be
accepted for 30 days from September 3,
1987.
-20-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
September 3, 1987; 52 FR
33480 (proposed consent
decrees)
Notice of proposed decrees lodged in
the Southern District of Texas for the
"Motco Site", and in the District of
Massachusetts, for the Hocomonco Pond
Site. Comments will be accepted for
30 days from September 3, 1987.
September 8, 1987; 52 FR
33812 (removal of regula-
tions )
September 9, 1987; 52 FR
33960 (extension of
comment period)
September 9, 1987; 52 FR
33936 (correction to
final rule)
September 10, 1987; 52 FR
34328 (notice of consent
decree)
September 15, 1987; 52 FR
34779 (notice of extension
of compliance date)
September 18, 1987; 52 FR
35279 (request for comments)
September 21, 1987; 52 FR
35452 (Final State Program
Authorization-Proposed)
Final rule withdrawing two procedural
rules concerning the Arbitration
Procedures and Natural Resource Claims
for the Hazardous Substance Superfund.
Extension of public comment period on
the August 6, 1987 proposal concerning
administrative enforcement orders
under Section 3008(h) to September 22,
1987 (40 CFR Parts 22 and 24).
Correction to the final Section
270.14, Development of Corrective
Action Programs After Permitting
Hazardous Waste Land Disposal
Facilities.
Settlement Agreement Pursuant to
CERCLA Harvey and Knotts hazardous
waste site in New Castle County,
Delaware, United States vs. General
Motors Corporation. Comments will be
accepted by the Assistant Attorney
General.
Extension of date for submission of
Part A Permit Applications for Certain
Cement Kilns Burning Hazardous Waste.
Request for comments on expanding the
sample exclusion in 40 CFR Section
261.4(d) to include samples sent for
treatability studies. Comments will
be accepted until October 19, 1987.
Proposal for Wisconsin's Final
Authorization of state hazardous waste
management program-applications for
revisions. Comments will be accepted
until October 21, 1987.
-21-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
September 22, 1987; 52 FR
35577 (notice of proposed
administrative settlement
CERCLA)
September 22, 1987; 52 FR
35604 (notice of availa-
bility of a joint guidance
document)
September 22, 1987; 52 FR
35556 (notice of compliance
schedule to adopt State
Program Modification)
September 23, 1987; 52 FR
35767 (notice of grant
issuance)
September 23, 1987; 52 FR
35838 (proposal to amend HW
permit modification
regulations)
September 23, 1987; 52 FR
35894 (final rule for SQG
exception reporting)
Notice of proposed administrative
settlement concerning the Union
Chemical Co., Inc. hazardous waste
site in South Hope, Maine, in
accordance with Section 122(1)(1).
Comments will be accepted for 30 days
from September 22, 1987.
Notice of availability of a joint
guidance document between EPA and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
concerning the Conceptual Design
Approach for Commercial Mixed Low-
Level Radioactive Waste Disposal
Facilities, from the RCRA/Superfund
Hotline.
Final authorization of Washington's
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program; Final Rule effective
November 23, 1987 unless a Federal
Register notice is published
withdrawing this action. Comments
will be accepted until October 22,
1987.
$1.2 million grant issued to the
National Governors Association to
implement Section 104(K) of SARA (the
State Capacity Assurance Project).
Proposal to amend regulations
governing modifications of hazardous
waste management permits. New
procedure that applies to various
types of changes at a facility.
Comments will be accepted until
November 23, 1987.
Finalization of the modified exception
reporting requirement for small
quantity generators of hazardous
waste.
-22-
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800-424-9346, Washington, D.C. Metro #202-382-3000
September 28, 1987; 52 FR
36311 (lodging of consent
decree)
September 29, 1987; 52 FR
36444 (notice of proposed
rulemaking)
September 29, 1987; 52 FR
36461 (extension of comment
period)
September 30, 1987; 52 FR
36616 (notice of Science
Advisory Board meeting)
September 30, 1987; 52 FR
36643 (notice of proposed
consent decree)
Notice of consent decree lodged in the
District of Connecticut for cost
recovery of response costs incurred
under CERCLA Section 107 and RCRA
Section 3008. The case was United
States vs. City of Derby, Connecticut.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days
from September 28, 1987.
Notice proposing final reauthorization
for Indiana's hazardous waste
management program. The final
authorization would not include
authorization to implement HSWA.
Comments will be accepted until
October 29, 1987. The action will
become final unless withdrawn in a
subsequent FR notice.
Notice extending the public comment
period for the interim guidance on
covenants not to sue under CERCLA
Section 122(f). Comments will be
accepted until October 30, 1987.
Notice of Science Advisory Board's
Radon Advisory Committee meetings,
October 13-16, 1987 in Washington,
D.C.
Notice of proposed consent decree
lodged in the District of Rhode Island
regarding the Picillo Farm Superfund
site in Coventry, Rhode Island, under
CERCLA Section 122(f)(2) and RCRA
Section 7003(d). Comments will be
accepted until October 30, 1987.
September 30, 1987; 52 FR
36644 (notice of proposed
consent decree)
Notice of proposed consent decree
lodged in the District of New Jersey
regarding the Renora Superfund Site in
Edison, New Jersey, under CERCLA
Section 107. Comments will be
accepted until October 30, 1987.
-23-
-------
Martha Anderson, DORM
Jim Barrett, GRC
Frank Biros, WH-527
George Bonina, WH-563
Susan Broram, WH-563
Karen Brown, PM-220
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City, KS
Diane Buxbaum, Region 2
Richard Clarizio, Region 5
Sylvia Lowrence, WH-562
Kathy Collier, RTF, NC
Peter Cook, WH-527
Alan Corson, WH-565
Elizabeth Cotsworth, WH-563
Wayne Crane, PM-273F
Hans Crump, WH-548B
Elaine Davies, WH-562
Truett DeGeare, WH-563
Melinda Downing, DOE
Karen Ellenberger, WH-562A
Tim Fields, WH-548B
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
Goerge Garland, WH-563
John Gilbert, EPA-Cin. OH
Peter Guerrero, WH-563
Matt Hale, WH-563
Penny Hansen, WH-562
Bill Hanson, WH-548E
Betti Harris, EPA, Region 7
Lee Herwig, A-104
Irene Homer, WH-595
Barbara Hostage, SE-384E
Hotline Staff
Warren Hull, A-104
Phil Jalbert, WH-548D
Alvin K. Joe, Jr., GRC
Gary Jonesi, WH-562
Jim Jowett, WH-548B
Thad Juszczak, WH-562A
Robert Knox, WH-562
Jack Kooyomjian, WH-548B
Mike Kosakowski, WH-527
Jerry Kotas, WH-527
Walter Kovalick, WH-548
Tapio Kuusinen, PM-223
Steve Leifer, LE-134S
Steve Levy, WH-565
Henry Longest, WH-548
Gene Lucero, WH-527
James Makris, WH-562A
Jack McGraw, WH-562A
Scott McPhilamy, Region 3
Toni Kennedy, (ASTSWMO)
Royal Nadeau, Region 2
Sam Napolitano, PM-220
Christina Parker, WH-562
John Riley, Wh-548B
Clem Rastatter, WH-548
Dale Ruhter, WH-565
William Sanjour, WH-563
Susan Sawtelle, WH-562
Pam Sbar, LE-134S
Mike Shannon, WH-563
Ken Shuster, WH-565
Elaine Stanley, WH-548
Jack Stanton, A-101
Bruce Weddle, WH-563
Steve Willhelm, Region 7
Marcia Williams, WH-562
Dan Yurman, WH-562A
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
-24-
-------
Patrick A. Parenteau
Regional Counsel
Region I, US EPA #2203
John F. Kennedy Federal Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
James H. Sargent
Regional Counsel
Region IV, US EPA
345 Courtland St. NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
David R. Tripp
Regional Counsel
Region VII, US EPA
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Douglas R. Blazey
Regional Counsel
Region II, US EPA
26 Federal plaza, Rm. 1009
New York, NY 10278
Robert B. Schaefer
Regional Counsel
Region V, US EPA
230 South Dearborn St.
Chicago/ IL 60604
Tom Speicher
Regional counsel
Region VII, EPA
999 18th St., One Denver Pi.
Denver, CO 80202
Bruce M. Diamond
Regional Counsel
Region ill, US EPA
841 chestnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19107
James Neet
Regional Counsel (6C)
Region VI, US EPA
1201 Elm St., inter. First TV
Dallas, IX 75270
Karl R. Morthole
Regional counsel
Region IX, US EPA
215 Fremont St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
Regional Libraries
Ms. Peg Nelson
U.S. EPA, Region I Library
Room 2100-B, JFK Federal Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
(617) 565-3300
Ms. Gayle Alston
U.S. EPA, Region rv Library
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30308
(404) 347-4216
Ms. Connie McKenzie
U.S. EPA, Region VII Library
324 East llth street
Kansas City, MO 64106
(913) 236-2828
Ms. Julienne Sears
U.S. EPA, Region x Library
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 442-1289
Mr. Dennis P. Carey
U.S. EPA, Reg. II Library
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-2881
Ms. lou Tilley
U.S. EPA, Region v Library
230 S. Dearborn St., I 1417
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 353-2022
Ms. Dolores Eddy
U.S. EPA, Reg. VIII Library
999 18th St. #500
Denver, CO 80202-2405
(303) 293-1444
Ms. Dottie Biggs
U.S. NEIC Library - Bldg. 53
BOX 25227
Denver Federal Ctr.
Denver/ CO 80225
(303) 236-3219
Ms. Diana McCreary
U.S. EPA, Reg. Ill Library 3MA2
Curtis Bldg., 6th & Walnut Sts.
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 597-0580
Ms. Leticia Lane
U.S. EPA, Region VI Library
1201 Elm Street
First internat'l Bldg.
Dallas, TX 75270
Ms. Marsha Saylor
U.S. EPA, Region IX Library
215 Fremont street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 974-8076
-25-
-------
Merrill S. Hbhman, Director
waste Management Division
U.S. EPA, Region I
John F. Kennedy Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
Patrick Tobin, Director
Waste Management Division ,
U.S. EPA, Region IV
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
David A. Wagoner, Director
Waste Management Division
U.S. EPA, Region VII
324 E. llth Street
Kansas City, MO 64106
Charles Findlay
Hazardous Waste Division
U.S. EPA, Region X
1200 6th Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Conrad Simon, Director
Air & Waste Mgmt. Divison
U.S. EPA, Region II
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
Bill Constantellos, Dir.
Waste Management Div.
U.S. EPA, Region V
111 W. Jackson St., 16th Fl.
Chicago, IL 60604
Robert L. Duprey, Dir.
Waste Mgmt. Division
EPA, Region VIII
1860 Lincoln St.
Denver, CO 80295
Stephen Wassersug, Director
Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Div.
EPA, Region III
6th and Walnut Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19106
Allyn M. Davis, Director
Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Div.
1201 Elm Street, EPA, Region V
First international Bldg.
Dallas, IX 75270
Jeffrey Zelikson, Director
Toxics & Wastes Mgmt. Div.
EPA, Region IX
215 Fremont street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Branch Chiefs
Linda Murphy, Chief
EPA, Region 1
State Waste Program Br.
John F. Kennedy Bldg.
Boston, MA 02203
James Scarborough, chief
Residuals Mgmt. Branch
EPA, Region IV
345 Courtland St., NE
Atlanta, GA 30308
Mike Sanderson, Chief
RCRA Branch
EPA, Region VII
726 Minnesota Ave.
Kansas City, MO 64106
Kenneth D. Feigner, Chief
waste Mgmt. Branch
EPA, Region X
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Richard salkie (2AWM-SW-Rm. 905)
EPA, Region II
Hazardous Waste programs Branch
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
David Stringham, Chief
Solid waste Branch (5HS13)
EPA, Region V
230 S. Dearborn St., 13th Fl.
Chicago, IL 60604
Lou Johnson, Chief
Hazardous Waste Branch
EPA, Region vin
1860 Lincoln St.
Denver, CO 80203
Bruce smith
Chief, Haz. Waste Enforcement Br.
O.S. EPA, Region III
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA' 19107
Robert Allen, Chief
EPA, Region III
Waste Mgmt. Branch (3WH30)
841 Chestnut St.
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Randy Brown, Chief
EPA, Region VI
Hazardous Waste program Br.
First International Bldg.
1201 Elm St.
Dallas, TX 75720
Philip Bobel, Chief
RCRA Programs Branch (T-2)
EPA, Region IX
215 Fremont St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
David Doyle
Chief, Records compliance
U.S. EPA, Region VII
324 East llth St.
Kansas City, MO 64106
-26-
-------
Janice Hicks (T-i-3)
Office of Ccnununity Relations
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Alvin Joe
Geo/Resource Consultants, inc.
851 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
Carl Eklund
Division of Solid & Haz. Waste
DEQE
wirter Street
Boston, MA 02108
Bruce Smith (3HW10)
Chief, Haz. Waste Enforcement Br.
U.S. EPA, Region III
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Richard Clarizio
U.S. EPA, Region V
230 South Dearborn St.
(5HS-13JCK)
Chicago, IL 60604
Myra Perez
U.S. EPA, Region VI
6608 Mornwood Drive
Houston, TX 77074
John Gilbert
U.S. EPA
Envir. Response Branch
26 West St. Clair St.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
John Bosky
U.S. EPA, Region VII
25 Funston Rd.
Kansas City, KS 66115
Lucy Mlenar
U.S. EPA, Region IX
215 Fremont street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Melinda Downing
Dept. of Energy
1000 independence Ave., SW
3 G092
Washington, D.C. 20585
John Creech
Air Informaton Ctr.
U.S. EPA, Mail Drop 35
Research Triangle park, NC
27711
Chet McLaughlin
State Programs Branch
U.S.EPA, Region VII
324 East llth St.
Kansas City, MO 64106
David Doyle
Chief, Records Complianc
U.S. EPA, Region VII
324 East llth St.
Kansas City, MO 64106
Diane Buxbaum
U.S. EPA, Region II
Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08837
Stephen Wilson
HQ APLC/DEVQ
WPAFB, Ohio 45433
Headquarters SAC/BEP
Offutt APB
Nebraska, 6811:?
-27-
------- |