%         UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     a
     *                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                                 530R88107
                                SEP   2 I938
                                                                 OFFICE OF
                                                       SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:   Final Monthly Report - RCRA/Superfund Industry Assistance
            Hotline and  Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-
            Know Hotline Report for July 1988
FROM:      Thea McManus, Project Officer /vV^^ST       R El  •  <,   ,
            Hubert Watters; Deputy Project Officer
            Office of Emergency and Remedial Response     ENVIRONMENTAL PkuitCTiON A
                                                              LIBRARY. REGION V
TO:         See List of Addresses

      This report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract #68-01-7371.

I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES - JULY 1988

 A.  RCRA

 1.  Tank Replacement

    A permitted storage facility has several above-ground storage tanks that are
    managed in compliance with Subpart J of 40 CFR 264. If the owner /operator
    replaces one of the tanks, would he be subject to any closure requirements?
    Would it make any difference if it were a facility with only one tank?

      Section  264.112(d)  requires notification of  partial  closure for surface
      impoundments, waste piles, land treatment units and landfills. This same
      section requires  notification regarding treatment, tank storage,  container
      storage or incinerator facilities only in the case of final closure.  Replacement
      of a storage tank would not constitute  final closure per Section 264.197,  and
      partial closure is not applicable to a storage tank facility per Section 264.1 12(d).
      While not specifically required, the owner/operator should decontaminate
      the  removed equipment and  notify  the state or region of the change.
      However, equipment that is not decontaminated must  be  managed as a
      hazardous waste.

    Source:       Bill Kline         (202) 382-7924
                 Chester Oszman   (202) 382-4499
    Research:     Laurie Huber

-------
2.  Wastewater Treatment Unit/Generator Accumulation Tank

  A manufacturing facility generates a wastewater  which is a listed hazardous
  waste. The wastewater is pumped to a tank for treatment where a wastewater
  treatment sludge is generated and subsequently sent off-site for disposal as a
  hazardous waste. The treatment effluent is discharged to a lake under a NPDES
  permit.  When the facility  operates  in this manner,  the tank meets  the
  definition of a wastewater treatment unit in 40 CFR 260.10. However, regularly
  occurring batch processes produce a wastewater which cannot be treated to the
  standards specified in the facility's  NPDES permit.   When this occurs, the
  wastewater is removed from the tank and sent off-site for  disposal. Is this tank
  classified as a  wastewater treatment unit or a generator accumulation  tank
  subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 262.34 and 40 CFR Part 265 Subpart J?

    The tank would  not be  classified  as  a wastewater treatment unit under 40
   . CFR 260.10.  The exemption from RCRA TSD Standards in 40 CFR Parts 264
    and 265 for wastewater treatment units applies to any  tank system that
    manages hazardous wastewater and is dedicated for use with an  on-site
    wastewater treatment facility. However, if a tank, in addition to being  used in
    conjunction with an on-site wastewater treatment  facility,  is used on  a
    routine or occasional basis  to store or treat a hazardous wastewater prior to
    shipment off-site for treatment, storage, or disposal, it  is not covered by  the
    exemption.  If the facility stores the hazardous wastewater in the tank  prior to
    off-site treatment or disposal for 90  days or less, it will be subject to  the
    requirements of 40 CFR 262.34.

  Source:       Emily Roth  (202) 382-4777
  Research:     Jim Styers

3.  Elementary Neutralization Units

  A generator produces large  volumes of corrosive waste.  It is pumped directly to
  a tank which  is an elementary neutralization unit.   However, this waste
  (corrosive only)  remains in  the tank for two months  before it is  actually
  neutralized.  Is this waste counted for purposes of determining generator status?
  Is the corrosive waste that is stored in the neutralization unit prior to treatment
  included  in the scope of the exemptions in Sections 264.1(g)(6), 265.1(c)(10) and
  270.1(c)(2)(v)?

    No, this type of waste is not counted for determining generator status.  As
    stated  in the March 24, 1986 Federal Register (51 FR 10146) wastes treated in
    elementary  neutralization  units  are  included in the general category of
    exempted or  excluded wastes that would not  be  counted in determining
    generator status.

-------
 3. Elementary Neutralization Units (Con't )

     Also, this waste is not counted because it is not subject  to substantive
     regulations  in  40 CFR Parts 262 and  263  as long as it remains in the
     neutralization unit (51 FR 10152).

   Source:        Bob April  (202) 382-7917
                 Emily Roth (202) 382-4777
   Research:      Mary Stevens
B.  CERCLA

 4. CERCLA Liability

   A tank farm has 150 tanks. Tank volumes range from 500 to 10,000 gallons.  The
   farm has been in operation for 20 years and the owner states that he has only
   stored  petroleum products  (i.e.,  gasoline, diesel fuel, and aviation fuel).  No
   other activities were performed there.  Over the years, the routine handling of
   fuels and tank fillings resulted in spills on-site.  In addition, three large releases
   (greater than 1,000 gallons) were documented.  The owner always  performed
   cleanups in accordance with environmental regulations.  Contaminated soil
   was taken to the local Subtitle D landfill for disposal.  It amounted to several
   thousand tons. Recently the landfill closed. Site assessments and investigations
   have since been conducted by  the EPA  and the State.   Sampling results
   confirmed that the landfill  is heavily contaminated.  Benzene and toluene are
   major contributors.  If the landfill became a National Priorities List  (NPL) site,
   could the tank farm owner be a potentially responsible party under CERCLA?

     In order to be a potentially responsible party under CERCLA, the tank farm
     owner must have been responsible  in some manner for the  release of
     "hazardous substances" at the site. CERCLA defines "hazardous substance" in
     Section 101(14) and excludes "petroleum" unless an oil fraction is otherwise
     specifically  listed in one of the statutes in Section  101(14).   Benzene and
     toulene are listed CERCLA "hazardous substances." See 40 CFR Table 302.4.

     EPA interprets the petroleum exclusion to  include  "hazardous  substances
     normally found in  refined  petroleum  fractions"  (see July 31,  1987
     memorandum on "Scope of  the  CERCLA  Petroleum Exclusion  under
     Sections  101(14) and  104(a)(2).")  Thus, hazardous constituents, like benzene
     and  toluene, are  not hazardous substances  when found at levels normally
     found in the refined petroleum product at issue.

-------
 4. CERCLA Liability (Con't)

     Due to the petroleum exclusion,  the  tank farm  owner could not be  a
     potentially  responsible  party under  CERCLA if he  only disposed of
     petroleum-contaminated soil at the Subtitle D landfill.

   Source:        Carrie Wehling    (202) 382-7706
   Research:      Mark Janaskie
C. CEPP

 5. Section 313: Enforcement

   The enforcement requirements of Title in (Section 325), state that the civil and
   Administrative  penalties for Section 313  non-compliance  shall  not  exceed
   $25,000 for each violation.  Is a non-compliance violation determined on a per
   facility or per toxic chemical basis?  Also, is that penalty assessed on a per-day
   basis?

     Section 325(c)(i) states that "any person who  violates any requirement of
     Section 313 shall be liable to the United States for a civil penalty in an amount
     not to  exceed $25,000 for each violation." Also, Section 325(c)(3)  states "each
     day  a violation continues shall, for the purposes of this subsection, constitute
     a separate violation" (emphasis added).  The requirements of Section 313 are
     that  the owner or operator of a covered facility must submit a  Form R for
     each toxic chemical that exceeds a specified threshold.  Therefore, the facility
     can be assessed a penalty for each Form R not submitted or for submitting a
     Form R that is  not in compliance with the  rules promulgated  under Section
     313 (40 CFR Part 372).  The penalty can be assessed on a per-day basis.

   Source:       Jeff Steward       (202) 382-7825
   Research:     Kim  Jennings

 6. Section 313: Supplier Notification Requirement

   A facility is required to provide the Section 313 supplier notification (40  CFR
   Section 372.45) for some of its products which contain listed toxic  chemical(s).
   The products contain antimony compounds,  a listed toxic chemical category.
   However,  the  facility  considers the chemical  names of  the antimony
   compounds in their products a  trade secret. Does this facility have to give the
   exact chemical  names of these antimony  compounds in order to fulfill the
   supplier  notification requirement?

-------
 6. Section 313: Supplier Notification Requirement (Con't )

     This facility's antimony compounds are not specifically listed in the Section
     313 toxic chemicals list, however, it does fall  into the antimony compounds
     category.  Since the name of the toxic chemical is not listed, the facility does
     not need to give the chemical  name to fulfill  the supplier notification
     requirement.  This facility needs to identify that the products contain an
     antimony compound  subject to Section  313,  the  concentration of  the
     compound in the mixture, and the stoichiometric amount of antimony in the
     compound.

   Source:        David Sarokin    (202) 382-3715
   Research:      John Ferris
   »
 7. Section 311 and 312:  Exemptions

   How are farms with ten or fewer employees  covered under Sections 311 and 312
   of Title ffl?

     Sections 311  and 312 apply  to any facility  covered by the OSHA Hazard
     Communication Standard (HCS).   On August 24, 1987, OSHA revised its HCS
     (52 FR 31852) to expand the scope of the  industries covered by the rule from
     the manufacturing sector (in Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)  codes 20-
     39) to all industries where employes are exposed to hazardous chemicals (SIC
     codes 1-89).  However,  this expansion  would not include  farms with ten or
     fewer employees.  This is due to a recent Congressional "rider" to OSHA's
     Appropriations Bill which prevents  OSHA from promulgating and  enforcing
     regulations for farms with ten or fewer  employees.   Therefore, since farms
     with ten or  fewer employees are  not covered by OSHA, they would not be
     covered under Sections 311  and 312.

   Source:        Kathy Brody      (202) 475-8353
   Research:      Kim Jennings

8.  Section 313:  Supplier Notification Requirement

   Under Section 313 a facility is required to provide the supplier notification (40
   CFR Section 372.45).  The product contains nitric acid, a listed  toxic chemical.
   However, the concentration of nitric  acid in the product varies from batch to
   batch. Can this facility give a  range of  concentration for the  nitric acid in this
   product in order to fulfill its supplier notification requirement?

-------
8.  Section 313:  Supplier Notification Requirement (Con't)

     According to  the current language in the  regulation  (40 CFR Section
     372.45(c)(3)), every time  a  concentration of a toxic  chemical in a mixture
     changes, the supplier is  to provide  an  updated  notification with  the new
     concentration.    Therefore,  this facility  cannot  provide a range  of
     concentration value in order to  fulfill the notification requirement.  Instead,
     the facility must provide a new notification with each product that has a
     different concentration of  a listed toxic chemical.

   Source:       David Sarokin     (202) 382-3715
   Research:     John  Ferris

-------
II. ACTIVITIES - JULY 1988

  1. The RCRA/Superfund Hotline and Emergency Planning and Community
    Right-to-Know Hotline responded to  14,995 questions and requests for
    documents in July. The breakdown is as follows:

                             RCRA    Superfund  UST   CEPP
Information Calls
Call Document Requests
Written Document Requests
Referrals
5,934
499
163
1,215
1,337
50


828
65


2,363 = 10,462
1319 = 1,933
893 = 1,056
329 = 1,544
Totals
7311
1,387
893    4,904  = 14,995
A. RCRA/Superfund Hotline Activities

  2. On July 5, Lawrence Pratt, Office of Toxic Substances (OTS) briefed the
    RCRA/Superfund Hotline on Title III, Section 313 provisions.

  3. On July 5,11,18 and 25, Chris Bryant and Caroline Pryor, Hotline Section Chiefs
    attended the Office of Solid Waste (OSW) Communications Workgroup
    meetings.

  4. On July 6, Julie Winters and Lawrence Pratt, OTS, and Alex Wolfe and Jim
    Craig, OSW briefed the RCRA/Superfund Hotline on Title HI, Section 313
    impacts on the RCRA and Superfund Programs.

  5. On July 6, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director met with Jim O'Leary, OSW
    regarding Hotline automation considerations.

  6. On July 7, Mike Fitzpatrick and Bob Hall, OSW briefed the RCRA/Superfund
    Hotline on  the oil and gas waste regulatory determination.

  7. On July 12, Laurie Huber, Hotline Information Specialist attended the OUST
    staff meeting.

  8. On July 14, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director met with Thea McManus,
    OSW Project Officer concerning Hotline operations.

  9. On July 18, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director briefed members of the OSW
    Communications Workgroup on  the RCRA/Superfund Hotline.

-------
A. RCRA/Superfund Hotline Activities (Cont'd)
 10. On July 18, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director and Becky Cuthbertson,
    Hotline Information Specialist met with Howard Wilson, Nancy Browne,
    Angelo Carasea, OSW and Larry Starfield, OGC concerning EPA's Contract
    Laboratory Program related to disposal of waste samples.
  11. On July 22, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director briefed OSW staff on the
     RCRA/Superfund Hotline.

  12. On July 25, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director and Laurie Huber, Hotline
     Information Specialist met with Bill Foskett, OUST regarding OUST training
     programs.

  13.' On July 28, Garrett Clark, OUST briefed the RCRA/Superfund Hotline on UST
     liability issues.

B. Title III Hotline Activities

  14. On July 5, Jon Roland, Hotline Information Specialist attended the Title HI
     Workgroup meeting on the status of Title III activities.

  15. On July 5, 12, 19 and 26, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director and Robert
     Costa, Hotline Section Chief met with Anastasia Watson, Preparedness Staff
     Program Liaison and Lawrence Pratt, OTS concerning Hotline operations and
     Section 313 issues.

  16. On July 6, Julie Winters and Lawrence Pratt, the Office of Toxic Substances
     briefed the Title in Hotline on the implementation of Phase II of Section 313
     Title III regarding uses of Toxic Release Inventory Data.

  17. On July 6,13, 20 and 27, members of the Title HI Hotline attended the Title m
     Outreach Subcommittee meeting on the status of Title HI communications
     strategy.

  18. On July 7, Robert Costa, Hotline Section Chief attended the conference call
     with EPA Regional Title HI Outreach Coordinators regarding the status of Title
     III communications strategy.

  19. On July 8, Minda Sarmiento, Hotline Information Specialist  attended the
     Federal Facilities Workgroup on the status of Federal facilities participation in
     Title in.
                                       8

-------
B. Title III Hotline Activities (Cont'd)
 20. On July 12, Jon Roland, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
     Preparedness Staff meeting.

 21. On July 14 and 28, members of the Title El Hotline attended EPA Outreach
     Regional conference calls.

 22. On July 18, Anita Bartera, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
     conference call with the FEMA/EPA Regional Title HI Coordinators on the
     status of Title III  activities.

 23. On July 19, Jim Buchert and Stephanie Portalski, Hotline Information
     Specialists attended  the Title HI Workgroup meeting on the status of Title HI
    . activities.

 24. On July 19 and 26, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director and Robert Costa,
     Hotline Section Chief met with Lawrence Pratt, OTS and Anastasia Watson,
     Preparedness Staff on the status of the Title HI Hotline.

 25. On July 28, John Ferris, Hotline Information Specialist attended the NRT
     meeting on the status of Federal preparedness and response activities.

 26. On July 28, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director met with Anastasia Watson,
     Preparedness Staff Liaison concerning Title HI Hotline projects.

 27. On July 28, Anita Bartera, Hotline Information Specialist and Robert Costa,
     Hotline Section Chief attended the conference call with EPA Regional
     Outreach Coordinators on the status of the Title IE communications strategy.

-------
I.  ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS - July 1988           Grand Total  =  10,091



                          RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Summary of Calls by EPA Region
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Region 6
Calls
Manufacturers
Generators
Transporters
TSDFs
EPAHQ
EPA Regions
Federal Agencies
State Agencies
Local Agencies
Used Oil Handlers
USTO/O
General Information
§3010 Notification
§260.10 Definitions
§260.22 Petitions/Delistina
§261.2 Solid Waste Definition
§261.3 Hazardous Waste Definition
§261 C Characteristic Haz. Waste
§261 D Listed Haz. Waste
§261.4 Exclusions
§261.5 Small Quantity Generators
§261.6 Recycling Standards
§261.7 Container Residues
§262 Generator-General
§262 100-1000 kfl/mo
§262 Manifest Information
§262 Accumulation
§262 Recordkeeping & Reporting
§262 International Shipments
§263 Transporters
6%
9%
24%
12%
14%
9%
5%
14%
1%
8%
1%
2%
3%
5%
1%
1%
5%
41 1
104
113
52
169
272
489
483
184
115
81
48
130
48
71
1 1 1
28
33
52
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
International Calls
Consultants
Attorneys
Laboratories
Univ ./Researchers
Trade Associatons
Insurance Co.'s
Environmental Groups
Press
Citizens
Other
§266 C Use Constituting Disposal
§266 D HW Burned
for Energy Recovery
§266 E Used Oil Burned
for Energy Recovery
§266 F Precious Metal Reclamation
§266 G Spent Lead— Acid
Battery Reclamation
Subtitle D
Used Oil • General
Household Haz. Waste
Dioxins
Mixed Radioactive Waste
Asbestos/PCBs/Radon
Infectious Waste
Liability/Enforcement
Corrective Action
Waste Minimization
Minimum Technology
3%
4%
13%
4%
0%
29%
9%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%f
4%
1%
13

59

69
13
1 1
151
87
25
25
1 7
146
69
69
74
34
26
                                    10

-------
RCRA
§264/§265 TSDF
A Scope/Applicability
B General Facility Standards
C Preparedness/Prevention
D Contingency Plans
E Manifest/Recordkeeping/Reportinj
F Ground-Water Monitoring
G Closure/Post Closure
H Financial Requirements
1 Containers
J Tanks
K Surface Impoundments
L Waste Piles
M Land Treatment
N Landfills
Liquids in Landfills
O Incinerators
P Thermal Treatment
CERCLA
General
SARA General
Acces and Information Gathering
Allocations from Fund/Fund
Balance/Grants
CERCLIS/5103 Notification
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Stds./ARARs/
How Clean Is Clean
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts/Contract Lab Proaram
Exposure Assess ./Public
Health Evaluation
Definitions
Enforcement
Federal Facilities
Haz. Subslances/RQs
HRS
Liability/PRPs
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages
81
28
1 1
1 7
10
131
117
26
44
108
47
6
5
56
9
49
7
84
15
1
19
107
6
71
6
23
40
14
26
15
169
46
132
1
2
Q Chem., Phys., Biol Treatment
R Underground Injection
X Miscellaneous
§268 General
§268 Solvent & Dioxins
§268 California List Wastes
§268 Scheduled Thirds
§269 Air Emission Stds.
§270 A General
§270 B Permit Application
§270 D Changes to Permits
§270 F Special Permits
§270 G Interim Status/LOIS
§271 State Programs
§124 Administrative Procedures
DOT Requirements
OSHA Reauirements/HW Training
Test Methods/HW Technologies
RCRA Document Requests
SUBTOTAL
NBARs
NCP
NPL
Off-Site Policy
On- Site Policy
PA/SI
Public Participation
Radon
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
RI/FS
RODs/Clean-Up Costs
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
Taxes
Title lll/Right-to-Know
Other Provisions
CERCLA Document Requests
CERCLA Subtotal
7
1 3
32
189
129
118
278
21
93
55
20
19
52
50
34
19
29
142
499{
6.433
1
35
218
9
5
18
5
0
2
19
7
28
55
28
33
6
8
82
1
50
1 ,387
  11

-------
Underground Storage Tanks
General
§280.10 Applicability
§280.11 Interm Prohibition
§280.12 Definitions - General
UST
Regulated Substance
§280 B New UST Systems - General
§280.20 Performance Stds.
§280.21 Upgrading
§280.22 Notification
§280 C General Operating Req.
§280 D Release Detection
340
57
44
25
24
26
16
12
14
25
8
35
§280 E Release Reporting and
Investigation
§280 F Corrective Action Petroleum
17
39
§280 G Corrective Action
Hazardous Substances
§280 H Out-of-Service/Closure
§280 I Financial Responsibility
§281 State UST Programs
Liability
Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
Other Provisions
UST Document Requests
UST Subtotal
9
53
37
16
18
9
3
1
65
893

TOTAL CALLS, DOCUMENT
REQUESTS and REFERRALS
10,091
  Referrals
  Referrals - EPA HQ
109
Other Hotlines
Regions
State
GPO/NTIS/PIC/ORD/Dockets
Other
Subtotal
213
153
189
443
108
1 ,215
  Written Request Responses
Referred to EPA Program Offices
Referred to other Federal Agencies
1 0
3
Referred externally (state,
organizations, etc.)
Response Form Sent
Response Form Sent/FOIA
Form Letter Sent/Need More Info.
Requests Filled - RCRA
- CERCLA
-UST
Subtotal
45
40
3
0
62
0
o.
163f
12

-------
        Emergency Planning  Community  Rlght-to-Know Information  Hotline
                   Daily/Monthly Summary Report  -  July 1988

                                     Totals
                               Total  Calls—4,011
                       Total Call  Document Requests—1,319
                           Total  Written   Requests-893

Distribution of Calls by  EPA  Regions
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
International
6%
12%
15%
13%
23%
0%
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
Unknown
6%
4%
2%
12%
2%
1%
Manufacturers
20 Food
21 Tobacco
22 Textiles
23 Apparel
24 Lumber & Wood
25 Furniture
26 Paper
27 Printina & Publishing
28 Chemicals
29 Petroleum & Coal
30 Rubber and Plastics
31 Leather
32 Stone. Clav & Glass
33 Primary Metals
34 Fabricated Metals
35 Machinery (Excluding Electrical
36 Electrical & Electronic Equipmer
37 Transportation Equipment
38 Instruments
39 Misc. Manufacturing
Not Able to Determine
Distributors
Title III General
§301-3 Emergency Planning
SERCs
Notification
TPQs
Mixtures
Extremely Hazardous Substances
2%
0.05%
1%
0.22%
1%
1%
1%
3%
10%
2%
3%
0.17%
2%
2%
9%
2%
4%
2%
0.42%
2%
3%
2%
376
188
95
71
44
12
241
Handlers
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/ Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Aaencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Citizens
Indians
Other
Delistina EHS
Exemptions
Training: General
§305 Training Grants
§305 Emergency Systems Review
§126 (SARA) Training Regulations
6%
5%
11%
1%
1%I
n?
2%
0.35%
1%
3%
2%
2%
2%
2%
0.25%
1%
1%
0.10%
3%
0%
2%
23
13
2
5
30
8
                                       13

-------
S311/I312
General 348
MSDS Reporting Reauirements 203
Tier l/ll Reaulations 224
Thresholds 221
§313
General 1,140
Form R 557
Thresholds 342
Phase II 46
Phase III 3
Workshop (Training) 1
Petitions 32
Health Effects 4
Database 6
Mass Balance Study 2



Referrals
OSHA 60
Preparedness Staff 1
OTS Staff 0
RCRA/Suoerfund Hotline 1 1 7
Reatonal EPA 8
TSCA Hotline 2 4
Other 1 1 9
Total Referrals 329

Document Requests: 1,319
No. of Documents Requested: 3,076

OSHA Expansion 239
Hazard Categories 4 3
Mixtures 42
Exemptions 8 3

CEPP: Interim Guide 9
Chemical Profile 1 4
NRT-1 59
Hazard Analysis 8 6
Risk Communication 6
Title III Workshops 1
Information Management 2
Prevention ARIP 1
Other 1 03

Trade Secrets 3 8
Enforcement 4 4
Liability 9;
Release Notification
General 7 0
Notification Requirements 37
Reportable Quantities 46
RQsvs.TPQs 1 1
CERCLA vs. 5304 5 9
Transportation 9
Exemptions 1 6



14

-------
                            RCRA/Superfund Hotline
           National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
IV. PUBLICATIONS-JULY 1988
 RCRA

   'The Survey of Vendors of External Petroleum Leak Monitoring Devices for Use
   with Underground Storage Tanks" is available from the Government Printing
   Office (GPO); the stock number is 055-000-00277-1.

   "Clean-up of Releases from Petroleum USTs:  Selected Technologies" is available
   from GPO; the stock number is 055-000-00272-0.

   "Hazardous Waste:  Future Availability of and Need for Treatment Capacity are
   Uncertain" is available from the Government Accounting Office (GAO)
   publications office at (202) 275-6241. The document stock number is GAO/RCED
   8895.

   "A Compendium of ORD and OSWER Documents Relevant to RCRA Corrective
   Action" is available by calling John Perry, OSW. The EPA document number is
   EPA/530-SW-88-010.
 CERCLA

   "Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions/'
   OSWER Directive number 9832.11 is available by routing address labels to Lori
   Tripoli, Federal Facilities Hazardous Waste Compliance Office (OS-530).
                                     15

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
V.  FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - JULY 1988

Former Notices with Open Comment Period
May 5,1988; 53 FR 16086
(interim final rule)
May 20,1988; 53 FR 18107
(proposed rule)
June 2,1988; 53 FR 20143
(advance of proposed
rulemaking)
June 2,1988; 53 FR 20165
(request for public comment)
June 2,1988; 53 FR 21040
(notice of data availability)
This interim final rule authorizes the
President to pay up to $10,000 to individuals
for information leading to successful
prosecution for a criminal violation under
CERCLA.  Comments will be accepted until
September 2,1988.

This notice announces a proposed change
to the delisting procedure in 40 CFR 260.22(b)
to ensure consistency with HSWA.
Comments were  received until July 5, 1988.

This notice announces the  Department of
Interior's intent to begin the process of
developing a type A procedure for the Great
technical data to  assist in the effort.  The
Department is also requesting information to
assist in determining the scope and technical
feasibility of developing type A procedures
for other environments  and natural
resources. Comments were accepted
through July 18,1988.

This notice requests public comment on a
proposed settlement under CERCLA Section
122(g) with Cannons Engineering Corp. et al.
Comments were  received until July 5, 1988.

This notice provides data and requests
comment on issues pertaining to infectious
waste. EPA will  accept public comments on
the issues posed  in this notice until August 1,
1988.
                                      16

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
June 6,1988; 53 FR 20738
(proposed rule to delay the
closure period for hazardous
waste management facilities)
June 13, 1988; 53 FR 22043
(notice of availability)
June 14, 1988; 53 FR 22222
(notice of public comment)
June 15, 1988; 53 FR 22334
(notice of proposed rule)
June 16, 1988; 53 FR 22566
(notice of proposed settlement)
Proposal to amend portions of the closure
requirements to allow a landfill or surface
impoundment to remain  open to receive
non-hazardous wastes. Conditions
applicable to such units are also described in
this proposal. Comments were accepted
through July 21,1988.

This notice announces the availability of an
interim final guidance manual entitled
Alternate Concentration Limit Guidance:
Case Studies. EPA will accept comments
until August 12, 1988.

This notice requests public comment on a
proposed settlement  under Sections 122(d)(3)
and 122(h)(l) of CERCLA with Davidson
Interior Trim/Textron, et. al.  Comments
were accepted through July 14,1988.

This Federal Register provides a correction to
the proposed delisting decision for U.S.
Nameplate Company, Inc., which appeared
in the Federal Register on May 3,1988.  This
notice also extended  the public comment on
that Federal Register until July 29,1988.

This notice announces a proposed settlement
under Section 122(0 of CERCLA concerning
the United Riggins and Hauling site in
Beltsville, Maryland.  Comments were
accepted until July 18,1988.
                                      17

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
June 20,1988; 53 FR 23128
(proposed rule)
June 23,1988; 53 FR 23661
(proposed rule with request
comment)
June 23,1988; 53 FR 23682
(notice of proposed settlement
under Section 122(h) of CERCLA)
June 24,1988; 53 FR 23978
(proposed rule; National
Priorities List, proposed sites
subject to RCRA, Subtitle C
Corrective Action authorities)
June 24, 1988; 53 FR 23988
(proposed rule, National
Priorities List, Update #7)
This rule grants a petition by proposing to
delete the toxic chemical, melamine, from
the list of toxic chemicals under Section 313
of Title III.  Comments on the delisting of
melamine will be accepted until August 19,
1988.

This rule proposes to grant delisting petitions
to Bethlehem Steel Corporation and pro-
poses the use of the fate and transport model
to evaluate the  waste-specific information in
this petition.  Comments on the delisting
petition and the use of the fate and transport
model in evaluating this petition will be
accepted until August 8,1988.

This notice announces a proposed settlement
under Section 122(h) of CERCLA with the
Southern Lumber Company, Champion
International Corporation, and the Masonite
Corporation.  Comments on the proposed
settlement were accepted until July 25,1988.

This rule reproposes 13  sites previously
proposed on  the National Priorities List
(NPL) and proposes to drop 30 sites from the
proposed NPL.  All 43 sites proposed are
subject to the Subtitle  C, Corrective Action
Authorities under RCRA.   Comments on the
proposal will be accepted until August 23,
1988.

This rule is proposing the seventh update to
the National Priorities List (NPL). Proposed
in this rule are 229 new  sites, 1 expansion to a
final site, and 4 previously proposed sites.
Comments on the proposal are accepted until
August 23,1988.
                                      18

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
June 27,1988; 53 FR 24141
(availability of two documents
with request for review
and  comment)
June 29,1988; 53 FR 24496
(notice of proposed settlement)
This notice announces the availability of two
external review drafts for public review and
comment.  The documents involve the
updated assessments for 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlor-
dibenzo-p-Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). The
Agency made these documents available
for public review and comment until July 6,
1988.  Comments must be postmarked by
October 5,1988.

Notice of a proposed settlement under
CERCLA Section 122(h) concerning the
Buckhorn Pesticide Site in Buckhorn, North
Carolina.  Comments on the proposed rule
were accepted through July 29,1988.
July Federal Registers

July 5,1988; 53 FR 25218
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
July 6,1988; 53 FR 25446
(regulatory determination)
July 7,1988; 53 FR 25537
(notice of availability)
Notice of a proposed partial consent decree
pursuant to CERCLA Section 106 and RCRA
Section 7003 in United States V.A. & F.
Materials Company.

Notice of EPA's determination not  to
regulate wastes from oil, gas, and geothermal
exploration, development and  production
under RCRA Subtitle C.

Notice announcing the availability of
minutes taken from the Municipal
Settlement Discussion Group's first meeting
held on June 7, 1988 in Washington, D.C.
The meeting was held by the Agency in order
to begin development on a Municipal
Settlement Policy.
                                      19

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 11,1988; 53 FR 26090
(notice of intent to delete)
July 12,1988; 53 FR 26283
(notice of proposed rule to grant
a petition)
July 13,1988; 53 FR 26455
(notice of proposed to rule
to grant a petition)
July 14,1988; 53 FR 26660
(announcement of upcoming
meeting)
July 15,1988; 53 FR 26858
(notice of proposed settlement)
This notice announces EPA's intent to delete
the A.L. Taylor site in Brooks, Kentucky from
the National Priorities List.  EPA will accept
comments on the deletion until August 10,
1988.

This Federal Register proposes to grant a
petition submitted to North American
Phillips Consumer Electronics  Corporation
in Greenville, Tennessee, to exclude certain
solid wastes generated at its facility from the
lists of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
Sections 261.31 and 261.32.  Public comments
will be accepted until August 26,1988.

This Federal Register proposed to grant a
petition submitted by Goodyear Tire and
Rubber Company, Randleman, North
Carolina to exclude certain solid wastes
generated at its facility from the lists of
hazardous wastes found in 40 CFR Sections
261.31 and 261.32.  Comments will be
accepted until August 29,1988.

This notice announces an upcoming meeting
of the Municipal Settlement Discussion
Group in Washington, D.C. on August 4,
1988.  Issues concerning the development of
a Municipal Settlement Policy will be
addressed at the meeting.

Notice of  proposed settlement under
CERCLA  Section 122(h) involving claims for
past and oversight costs at the A.Y.
McDonald site in Debuque, Iowa.
                                      20

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 15,1988; 53 FR 2689
(notice of proposed settlement)
July 18,1988; 53 FR 27077
(notice of availability)
July 18,1988; 53 FR 27106
(notice of correction)
July 19,1988; 53 FR 27162
(notice of technical correc-
tion)
July 19,1988; 53 FR 27164
(notice of technical correc-
tion)
July 19,1988; 53 FR 27268
(proposal to clarify the
Federally Permitted Release
exemption)
Notice of proposed settlement under
CERCLA Section 122(h) for response cost
claims at the Babb Drum site in Little
Chicago, South Carolina.

The notice  announces the availability of a
new financial assistance program for states
entitled "Source Reduction and Recycling
Technical Assistance."

The notice  corrects  the phone number of the
informational contact in the July 7,1988
Federal Register which dealt with the
Municipal  Settlement Discussion group's
first meeting.

The notice  makes a technical correction to
the March 24,1986 Federal Register, small
quantity generator rule. The correction  is
made in 40 CFR Sections 261.5(e) and (f).

The notice  makes technical corrections to
Sections 262, 264, 268 and 270 of 40 CFR,
regarding the Farmer Exclusion exemption.
The errors  were made when the farmer
exemption  was moved from Section  262.51 to
262.70 in the August 8, 1988 Federal Register.
and inadvertently moved  back  to Section
262.51 in the July 8,1987 Federal Register.

This rule proposes to clarify the Federally
permitted release exemption for hazardous
substances  under CERCLA Sections 103,106,
and also, Section 311 of the Clean Water Act.
                                       21

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 19,1988; 53 FR 27290
(notice of final rule)
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27371
(notice of Agency's intent to
delete)
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27393
(notice of proposed settlement)
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27411
(lodging of consent decree)
July 22,1988; 53 FR 27679
(notice of proposed rule)
This final rule conditionally exempts small-
scale treatability studies from the Subtitle C
regulation.

This notice announces the Agency's intent to
delete the Matthews Electroplating site in
Roanoke County, Virginia from the National
Priorities List. Comments must be
submitted on or before August 19,1988.

This notice announces a proposed settlement
under Section 122(h) of CERCLA.  The
Agency has decided to settle claims for
response costs at the Salvo Property site in
Lithia Springs, Georgia, with Joseph E. Salvo.
EPA will accept comments on the settlement
for 30 days.

This notice announces the lodging of a
consent decree under CERCLA Sections 104
and 106 in United States vs. Hallie C.
Ormond, C.C. Grisham and Mary F. Burke.
The Department of Justice will accept
comments for 30 days on this action.

This rule announces that the OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard (HCS) was
expanded to non-manufacturing, except
for the construction industry, effective
June 24, 1988. However, OSHA will not
begin checking for compliance with the HCS
in programmed inspections until August 1,
1988.
                                      22

-------
                             RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 26,1988; 53 FR 28118
(notice of final rule)
July 26,1988; 53 FR 28160
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
July 27,1988; 53 FR 28278
(notice of a proposed consent
decree)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28456
(notice of proposed consent decree)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28414
(notice of EPA's intent to
delete)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28383
(notice of final rule)
This final rule establishes the EPA's
approach to implementing the statutorily
mandated prohibitions on the underground
injection of hazardous waste.

This is a proposed revision to the Ground-
water Monitoring regulations in 40 CFR Part
264 Subpart F and Part 270.  The amendments
that are proposed in this Federal Register are
designed to foster the early detection of leaks
and to better tailor the current ground-water
monitoring regulations to site specific
conditions.  EPA will accept public comments
until September 26, 1988.

This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in United States vs. Olin Corporation
under Section 122(i) of CERCLA.  The
Department of Justice will be accepting
comments on this action for a 30-day period.

This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in the United  States vs. CSX
Transportation, Inc.,  et. al., under Section 122
of CERCLA.  The Department of Justice will
receive public comments for a period of 30
days.

This notice announces  EPA's intent to delete
the Presque Isle site  in Erie, Pennsylvania
from the National Priorities  List.  EPA is
accepting comments  until August 29,  1988.

Notice of EPA's intent to approve Georgia's
hazardous waste program revision for the
hazardous components of radioactive mixed
wastes and for closure, post-closure, and
financial responsibility requirements.  EPA
will accept comments until August 29, 1988.
                                       23

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
            National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 29,1988; 53 FR 28772              This rule publishes the procedures for claims
(notice of final rule)                   of trade secrecy made by facilities reporting
                                      under Sections 303(d)(2) and (d)(3), 311, 312,
                                      and 313 of Title III and for EPA's handling of
                                      such claims for submission and handling of
                                      petitions requesting reviews of trade secrecy
                                      claims, and for disclosure to health
                                      professionals of information claimed as trade
                                      secret.
                                        24

-------
List of Addressees:
Devereaux Barnes, OS-330
Jim Berlow, OS-322
Frank Biros, OS-500
George Bonina, OS-310
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Karen Brown, PM-220
Diane Buxbaum, Region 2
Jon Cannon, OS-100
Jayne Carlin, Region 10
Fred Chanania, LE-132S
Richard Clarizio, Region 5
Kathy Collier, RTF, NC
Elizabeth Cotsworth, OS-343
Wayne Crane;  PM-273F
Hans Crump, OS-210
Gordon Davidson, OS-500
Elaine Davies,  OS-301
Truett DeGeare, OS-301
Bob Dellinger,  OS-332
Jeffery Denit, OS-300
Bruce Diamond, OS-500
Melinda Downing, DOE
Karen Ellenberger, OS-100
Tim Fields, OS-210
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
George Garland, OS-342
John Gilbert, EPA-Cin., OH
Lloyd Guerci, OS-500
Matt Hale, OS-340
Lynn Hansen,  OS-305
Penny Hansen, OS-230
Bill Hanson, OS-220
Betti Harris, Region 7
Cheryl Hawkins, OS-200
Steve Hooper,  OS-500
Irene Horner, WH-595
Barbara Hostage, OS-210
Hotline Staff
Phil Jalbert, OS-240
Alvin K. Joe, Jr., GRC
Gary Jonesi, LE-134S
Jim Jowett, OS-210
Thad Juzczak, OS-100
Robert Knox, OS-130
Mike Kosakowski, OS-51
Walter Kovalick, OS-200
Tapio Kuusinen, PM-223
Steve Leifer, LE-134S
Steve Levy, OS-301
Henry Longest, OS-200
Sylvia Lowrence, OS-300
James Makris, OS-120
Joseph Martone, A-104
Scott McPhilamy, Region 3
Margaret Milligan, PM-214F
Royal Nadeau, Region 2
Mike Petruska, OS-332
Lawrence  Pratt, TS-779
Carl Reeverts, WH-550E
John Riley, OS-210
Suzanne Rudzinski, OS-343
Dale Ruhter, OS-320
William Sanjour, OS-332
Pam Sbar, LE-134S
Mike Shannon, OS-310
Mike Shapiro, TS-779
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Jack Stanton, A-101
Anastasia  Watson, OS-120
Bruce Weddle, OS-301
Steve Willhelm, Region 7
Dan Yurman, OS-100
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
                                  25

-------
n r
I   C-
ill
  - EPS, °J988
F3ERMIT SECTION

 EPA, REGION V

-------