UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
NOV , 530R88108
MEMORANDUM souo WASTE AN°DFFEMER«NCY RESPONSE
SUBJECT: Final Monthly Report - RCRA/Superfund Industry Assistance
Hotline and Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-
Know Hotline Report for August 1988
FROM: Thea McManus, Project Officer -^l k/^__ h? Pf^* F" I \/ E* F"\
Office of Solid Waste \f *~^ E-l V CLU
Hubert Watters, Deputy Project Officer-|'1>/ f J'! v 1 " 1988
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTION «o.
LIBRARY, REGION V
TO: See list of Addressees
This report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract #68-01-7371.
I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES - AUGUST 1988
A. RCRA
1. Source Reduction and Recycling Technical Assistance Grants For States
On July 18, 1988 (53 FR 27077) EPA announced the availability of a new financial
assistance program, "Source Reduction and Recycling Technical Assistance" for
States to develop or expand source reduction and recycling technical assistance
programs. The program is a grant/cooperative agreement program designed to
provide assistance to a limited number of states to establish or expand technical
assistance programs that address the reduction of pollutants from air, land,
surface, water and ground-water.
How much money is available to states through this program?
Congress appropriated $4 million for the source reduction and recycling
program. Of the total $4 million, $3 million will be awarded to States in fiscal
year 1989 under cooperative agreements. Approximately 10-12 states will be
selected through open competition. Each selected state will be eligible to
receive no more than $300,000.
What procedures should a state follow to receive grant money?
To apply for funds, State environmental agencies must: (1) submit a letter of
intent by August 15, 1988; and (2) submit a grant applications package by
September 30, 1988.
-------
1. Source Reduction and Recycling Technical Assistance Grants For States
(Cont'd)
What types of activities are eligible for funding?
These cooperative agreement funds are to be used specifically for establishing
and expanding source reduction and recycling assistance programs that
address the transfer of pollutants across all environmental media. A list of
possible activities eligible for funding include the following:
—Hiring personnel and/or procuring necessary expertise to support the
establishment and development of multimedia program;
—Providing direct technical assistance in source reduction and recycling,
especially to small and medium-sized firms;
—Conducting demonstration activities and/or in-plant pilot scale studies of
pollution prevention technologies;
—Developing and delivering programs to train staff to provide technical
assistance to generators in identifying and implementing source reduction
and recycling opportunities and activities;
—Developing or expanding state technical information clearinghouses that
contribute to national technical transfer networks or clearinghouses;
—Expanding and improving waste exchange programs among industry, states
and local governments;
—Developing and distributing industry/process-specific technical manuals
and/or brochures to help generators identify and implement source
reduction and recycling activities; and,
—Conducting outreach activities such as presentations, workshops and
seminars.
What are the differences between this program and RITTA?
RITTA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Integrated Training and
Technical Assistance Initiative) is designed to provide assistance to States to
plan and implement hazardous waste training and technical assistance
activities in support of the States' RCRA programs. The activities funded
under RITTA must include: (1) the development of a long term plan for
training and technical assistance activities; (2) delivery of RCRA program
training activities for State regulators; and (3) implementation of an initial
pilot technical assistance project in waste minimization.
The cooperative agreement funds will be awarded to States to establish multi-
media waste reduction technical assistance programs. Unlike RITTA, this
program is not specifically limited to wastes regulated under RCRA.
Source: Jackie Krieger (202) 382-6972
Research: Chris Bryant
-------
B. CERCLA
2. Disposal of CERCLA Samples
Who is responsible for the disposal of hazardous waste samples taken from
Superfund sites during a Site Investigation or a Remedial Investigation, the
Contract Laboratory or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)?
It is sometimes difficult to determine whether a waste material, which has
already been disposed of, was a RCRA hazardous waste. The January 19,1983
Federal Register (48 FR 2510) explains that "if it cannot be determined
whether a discharged material is a listed hazardous waste, Sections 261.20
through 261.24 describe criteria for determining whether a solid waste exhibits
the hazardous waste characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or
toxicity."
If laboratory samples for waste characterization are handled in accordance
with the requirements in 40 CFR Section 261.4(d), they are not subject to the
RCRA hazardous waste regulations during collection, transport, and analysis
in the laboratory. However, if the handling of the samples by the laboratory
constitutes treatment or storage of hazardous wastes prior to disposal, then
the laboratory must comply with applicable RCRA requirements (46 FR 47428,
September 25, 1981). The conditional exemption from RCRA requirements
specifically applies to samples of "solid waste" (as compared to "hazardous
waste") or samples of "water, soil or air," which are collected for the sole
purpose of testing to determine the waste's characteristics or composition.
Once the sample is no longer needed for enforcement purposes, the issue of
who is responsible for the sample's disposal is raised. Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP) contracts are generally written such that the laboratory
specifically assumes generator responsibilities under RCRA when the waste
samples are found to include RCRA hazardous wastes. The laboratories also
assume responsibility for disposal of waste samples which are not hazardous
wastes.
The disposal of laboratory samples of CERCLA waste is not specifically
addressed by the revised off-site policy of November 13, 1987, which
"describes procedures that should be observed when a response action under
CERCLA... involves off-site storage, treatment, or disposal of CERCLA wastes"
(OSWER Directive No. 9834.11). However, the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER) has recommended that Federal facilities
comply with this policy for the disposal of their hazardous waste, and the
Environmental Compliance Coordinators for Regional, Research, and
Program Laboratories have been directed to ensure that EPA laboratories do
-------
2. Disposal of CERCLA Samples (Cont'd)
so [September 2, 1986, memo from Barbara McGuinness to EPA Laboratory
Directors].
Consistent with the CERCLA off-site policy, Contract Laboratories which are
disposing of CERCLA samples are limited in their disposal options. If the
samples are found to include RCRA hazardous wastes, the shipment must be
to a facility which is authorized to receive RCRA hazardous wastes, and that
has been determined to be acceptable to receive CERCLA wastes under the
revised off-site policy. If a sample contains a CERCLA hazardous substance
which is not a RCRA hazardous waste, the revised off-site policy would
require disposal in a unit that is authorized under applicable law to receive
such wastes and that has been found to be acceptable under the off-site policy.
Source: Nancy Browne (202)475-8115
Angelo Carasea (202) 382-7906
Larry Starfield (202) 382-7706
Howard Wilson (202) 382-3646
Research: Becky Cuthbertson
3. CERCLA Off-Site Policy
Is the CERCLA off-site policy applicable to hazardous substance response actions
performed by private parties who are not acting under a Section 104/106 order?
The off-site policy "describes procedures that should be observed when a
response action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or Section 7003 of RCRA involves
the off-site storage, treatment or disposal of CERCLA wastes" (Revised
Procedures for Implementing Off-site Response Actions, OSWER Directive
No. 9834.11). The policy applies to all response actions taken under the
authority of CERCLA, RCRA Section 7003, or Clean Water Act Section 311,
and to all response actions funded in whole, or in part by CERCLA. It does
(for non-petroleum wastes) not apply to state-lead enforcement actions (even
at National Priorities List sites) if no CERCLA funds are involved, and does
not apply to voluntary PRP actions taken outside of a CERCLA or RCRA
Section 7003 order (see OSWER Directive No. 9834.11 at p.3).
Source: Larry Starfield (202) 382-7706
Research: Steven Campbell
-------
4. Technical Assistance Grants
If a State is administering the Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) program in lieu
of the EPA, would a grant recipient still have to provide 35 percent of the total
costs of the Technical Assistance Grant project if the State provides a technical
advisor to the recipient in lieu of a cash grant?
Yes. Pursuant to Section 117(e) of CERCLA, as amended, the EPA may
provide technical assistance grants to groups of individuals affected by
releases or threatened releases from sites listed on the National Priorities List
(NPL) or proposed for listing where a response action is underway. The
March 24, 1988 Federal Register (53 FR 9736) promulgated interim final
regulations for implementing EPA's TAG program. According to these
regulations, eligible recipients must meet a number of requirements,
including a contribution of 35 percent of the total costs of the technical
assistance grant project (see 40 CFR Section 35.4085(a)).
EPA will administer the TAG program in accordance with the regulations
found in the March 24, 1988 Federal Register unless a State wishes to
implement its own program. According to 40 CFR Section 35.4015(c), States
wishing to administer the TAG program must inform the appropriate EPA
Regional Administrator. If the State elects to administer the program it must
do so in conformity with the regulations specified in the March 24, 1988
Federal Register (53 FR 9749). States choosing to administer the TAG program
will receive technical assistance funds and administrative costs from the
Agency under a cooperative agreement (see 40 CFR Section 35.4015(d)).
Furthermore, following the criteria established in the March 24, 1988 Federal
Register, the State may select qualified applicants and provide technical
assistance in either of two ways: a State may provide technical assistance
funds to an eligible group through a subgrant, and reimburse the recipient
group for it's expenditures as provided in 40 CFR Section 30.4080 of the March
24, 1988 Federal Register (53 FR 9749, 40 CFR Section 35.4015(d)(l)); or use
technical assistance grant funds to obtain the services of a technical advisor
for the recipient.
Even though the State will be providing the services of a technical advisor
instead of providing technical assistance funds to a recipient, the matching
requirement specified in 40 CFR Section 35.4085(a) is still applicable.
Source: Daphne Gemmill (202)382-2460
Research: Steve Campbell
-------
C CEPP
5. Section 302: Determining Threshold Planning Quantities
A petroleum company is drilling for oil contained in the ground below their
facility. Would the hydrogen sulfide present in the ground be counted toward
the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) for this extremely hazardous substance
(EHS)?
Also, if there is a reportable release of this EHS above the reportable quantity
(RQ) during this operation, would this release need to be reported under Section
302/304 of Title III?
For the purposes of emergency planning, Section 302 of Title III, the EPA is
considering the issue of whether to include amounts of EHS's naturally
present within facility grounds in determining if the TPQ has been met or
exceeded. This issue is not addressed in the regulations, and at this time has
not been resolved by EPA.
If the facility is generating hydrogen sulfide during its drilling operations,
then the quantity they generate must be included in the TPQ determination
for hydrogen sulfide. The facility is producing or causing the hydrogen
sulfide to be present and is therefore subject to Section 302 reporting.
A release of hydrogen sulfide above its RQ that affects persons off-site must be
reported under Section 304 of Title III since the release would occur from the
facility. The quantity of such releases may be determined.
Source: Rick Horner (202) 382-7945
Kathy Bishop (202) 382-7912
Research: Jim Buchert
6. Sections 311/312: Multiple Facility Reporting
A petroleum company owns many oil wells on a large oil field. Each well is on
its own plot of land. These plots of land are not adjacent or contiguous and the
oil field itself spans many local planning districts. For purposes of Sections
311/312 reporting, is each oil well a separate facility and must separate reports be
filed for each oil well?
The definition of facility for Sections 311/312 includes "all buildings,
equipment, structures, and other stationary items that are located on a single
site or on contiguous or adjacent sites that are owned or operated by the same
person" (52 FR 38364). Therefore, unless the well properties are adjacent or
contiguous, each well is a separate facility. The Title III definition of facility
-------
6. Sections 311/312: Multiple Facility Reporting (Cont'd)
applies to the land surface only; the fact that one oil company may own the
subsurface rights of an entire oil field does not make the field one "facility."
Under Sections 311/312, a report must be prepared for each facility owned or
operated by the same person. The regulations stipulate that certain
information must be provided to the specified agencies. Nowhere do the
regulations stipulate a separate report for each facility. Since EPA does not
stipulate a separate report for each facility, EPA does not prohibit one report
being filed for similar multiple facilities, so long as the report satisfies the
statutory information requirements.
Filing one report for similar multiple facilities is a kind of "generic
reporting." A generic report would consist of one submission for each section
- one MSDS for each reportable chemical and one Tier I/II - which would
provide the required information on each well (facility). However, a generic
report may only be submitted for similar facilities. In order for facilities to be
considered similar, they must have present the same extremely hazardous
substances and hazardous substances on-site at any one time in similar
amounts. If the facilities are not similar, the generic report would not contain
the facility-specific required information and the facility would not be
considered in compliance with Sections 311/312.
When submitting a report under Sections 311/312, the report must be sent to
the SERC, the LEPC and the fire department. In the case of a generic report
being submitted, the report must be submitted to every SERC, LEPC and fire
department under whose jurisdiction the similar facility crosses.
In the case of reporting for an oil field and oil wells therein, generic reporting
will prove beneficial since most wells are similar on a given field. Simply
make sure that the wells are in fact similar, that the generic report provides
the facility-specific information required and that the report is submitted to
all relevant State and local agencies. In that manner, the generic report will
provide all facility-specific information to all relevant State and local
agencies.
Source: Kirsten Engel (202) 382-7706
Research: Anita Bartera
-------
II. ACTIVITIES - AUGUST 1988
1. The RCRA/Superfund Hotline and Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Hotline responded to 17,255 questions and requests for
documents in August. The breakdown is as follows:
RCRA Superfund UST CEPP
Information Calls
Call Document Requests
Written Document Requests
Referrals
7,544
801
253
1360
1,572
171
1,143
42
2^54 = 12,613
1,287 = 2,301
362 = 615
366 = 1,726
Totals 9,958 1,743 1,185 4,369 = 17,255
A. RCRA/Superfund Hotline Activities
2. On August 10, Tod Gold, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response briefed
the Hotline on the National Contingency Plan.
3. On August 11, Jackie Krieger, Office of Solid Waste briefed the Hotline on
Waste Minimization.
4. On August 17 and 18, Laurie Huber and George Kleevic RCRA/Superfund
Hotline Information Specialists attended the UST Training Course offered by
the Office of Underground Storage Tanks.
5. On August 18, Caroline Pryor, Hotline Section Chief met with Betti VanEpps,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response regarding the OERR Directives
System.
6. On August 19, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director met with Thea McManus,
Office of Solid Waste, Project Officer, regarding Hotline operations.
7. On August 24 and 25, Chris Bryant, Hotline Section Chief attended the
Governmental Refuse Collection and Disposal Association (GRCDA) held in
Baltimore, Maryland.
8. On August 30, Laurie Huber, Hotline Information Specialist briefed the Hotline
on the details of the UST Training Course.
9. On August 30, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director met with Hubert Watters,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Deputy Project Officer, regarding
Hotline operations.
-------
10. On August 31, George Kleevic, Hotline Information Specialist briefed the
Hotline on the details of the UST Training Course.
B. Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Hotline Activities
11. On August 1, Stephanie Portalski, Hotline Information Specialist and Robert
Costa, Title III Hotline Section Chief, attended the conference call with
FEMA/EPA Regional Title III Coordinators on the status of the Title III
activities.
12. On August 2, Anita Bartera, Hotline Information Specialist attended the Title
III Workgroup meeting on the status of Title III activities.
13. On August 2, 9, 16, 23 and 30, Denise Sines, Hotline Project Director and Robert
Costa, Hotline Section Chief, met with Anastasia Watson, Preparedness
Program Liaison and Lawrence Pratt, Office of Toxic Substances, concerning
Title IH/OTS related issues.
14. On August 3, members of the Title III Hotline met with Anastasia Watson and
Tony Jover of the Preparedness staff along with an EPA contractor to discuss
Title III information management issues for an upcoming EPA study.
15. On August 9 and 23, members of the Title III Hotline staff attended the
Preparedness Staff meetings.
16. On August 10,17, 24 and 31, members of the Title III Hotline staff attended the
Title III Outreach Subcommittee meeting on status of the Title HI
communications strategy.
17. On August 11 and 25, Kim Jennings, Hotline Information Specialist attended
the ARIP Regional Conference call on the status of ARIP implementation.
18. On August 15, Anita Bartera, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
conference call with the FEMA/EPA Regional Title III coordinators on the
status of Title HI activities.
19. On August 15, Minda Sarmiento, Hotline Information Specialist and Robert
Costa, Hotline Section Chief, participated in a tour of the Title III Reporting
Center.
20. On August 16, Robert Costa, Hotline Information Specialist attended the Title
III Workgroup meeting on the status of Title III activities.
21. On August 17, Robert Costa, Hotline Section Chief met with Renee Rico of the
Office of Toxic Substances on the status of Section 313 Petitions.
-------
22. On August 25, Minda Sarmiento, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
NRT meeting on the status of Federal preparedness and response activities.
23. On August 25, Robert Costa, Hotline Section Chief attended the conference call
with EPA Regional Outreach Coordinators on the status of the Title III
communications strategy.
24. On August 29, Jon Roland, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
conference call with the FEMA/EPA Regional Title III Coordinators on the
status of Title HI activities.
25. On August 30, Minda Sarmiento, Hotline Information Specialist attended the
Title HI Workgroup on the status of Title III activities.
10
-------
III. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS - August 1988 Grand Total = 12,886
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Summary of Calls bv EPA Region
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Region 6
Calls
Manufacturers
Generators
Transporters
TSDFs
EPAHQ
EPA Regions
Federal Agencies
State Agencies
Local Agencies
Used Oil Handlers
USTO/0
General Information
§3010 Notification
§260.10 Definitions
$260.22 Petitions/Delisting
§261 .2 Solid Waste Definition
$261.3 Hazardous Waste Definition
$261 C Characteristic Haz. Waste
$261 D Listed Haz. Waste
$261.4 Exclusions
$261.5 Small Quantity Generators
$261.6 Recycling Standards
$261 .7 Container Residues
$262 Generator-General
$262 100-1000 kg/mo
$262 Manifest Information
$262 Accumulation
$262 Recordkeeping & Reporting
$262 International Shipments
$263 Transporters
6%
10%
22%
11%
17%
9%
4%
15%
1%
8%
1%
3%
2%
5%
2%
1%
6%
446
99
95
39
157
242
553
582
189
168
117
95
150
102
104
119
38
38
69
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
International Calls
Consultants
Attorneys
Laboratories
Univ ./Researchers
Trade Assodatons
Insurance Co.'s
Environmental Grouos
Press
Citizens
Other
RCRA
§266 C Use Constituting Disposal
§266 D HW Burned
for Energy Recovery
$266 E Used Oil Burned
for Energy Recovery
8266 F Precious Metal Reclamation
§266 G Spent Lead- Add
Battery Reclamation
Subtitle D
Used Oil - General
Household Haz. Waste
Dioxins
Mixed Radioactive Waste
Asbestos/PCBs/Radon
Infectious Waste
Liability/Enforcement
Corrective Action
Waste Minimization
Minimum Technology
4%
5%
11%
4%
0%
30%
9%
2%
2%
0%
0%
1%
1%
5%
1%
21
67
88
31
19
297
61
27
23
32
123
91
101
51
51
48
11
-------
RCRA
§264/§265 TSDF
A Scope/Applicability
B General Facility Standards
C Preparedness/Prevention
D Contingency Plans
E Manifest/Recordkeeping/Reportin<
F Ground-Water Monitoring
G Closure/Post Closure
H Financial Requirements
1 Containers
J Tanks
K Surface Impoundments
L Waste Piles
M Land Treatment
N Landfills
Liquids in Landfills
0 Incinerators
P Thermal Treatment
Q Chem., Phys., Btol Treatment
Underground Storage Tanks
General
§280.10 Applicability
§280.11 Interm Prohibition
§280.12 Definitions - General
UST
Regulated Substance
§280 B New UST Systems - General
§280.20 Performance Stds.
§280.21 Upgrading
§280.22 Notification
§280 C General Operating Req.
§280 D Release Detection
§280 E Release Rpt. & Investigation
Referrals
Referrals - EPA HQ
Other Hotlines
Regions
State
GPO/NTIS/PIC/ORD/Dockets
Other
SUBTOTAL
142
25
9
1 9
27
105
133
53
71
168
67
15
1 4
38
26
51
6
3
1,081
85
28
47
47
26
14
23
51
30
23
64
23
40
1 17
86
260
367
55
925
R Underground Injection
X Miscellaneous
§268 General
§268 Solvent & Dioxins
§268 California List Wastes
§268 Schedled Thirds
§269 Air Emissions Standards
§270 A General
§270 B Permit Application
§270 D Changes to Permits
§270 F Special Permits
§270 G Interim Status/LOIS
§271 State Programs
§124 Administrative Procedures
DOT Requirements
OSHA Requirements/HW Training
Test Methods/HW Technologies
RCRA Document Requests
SUBTOTAL
§280 F Corrective Action Petroleum
1 4
38
249
96
169
577
5
56
52
1 7
21
52
85
4
32
38
137
1,895
7,362
36
§280 G Corrective Action
Hazardous Substances
§280 H Out-of-Service/Closure
§280 I Financial Responsibility
§281 State UST Programs
Liability
Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
Other Provisions
UST Document Requests
UST SUBTOTAL
Written Request Responses
Referred to EPA Program Offices
Referred to other Federal Agencies
1 2
61
52
1 2
27
1 2
1 5
36
1,491
2,296
0
38
0
Referred externally (state,
organizations, etc.)
Response Form Sent
Response Form Sent/FOIA
Form Letter Sent/Need More Info.
Requests Filled - RCRA
- CERCLA
-UST
SUBTOTAL
42
0
0
0
275
0
0
253
12
-------
CERCLA
Access & Information Gatherinq
Administrative Record
Allocations from Fund
General
ARARs
CERCUS
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Costs
Clean-Up Standards
Community Relations
Contract Lab Program (CLP)
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts
Definitions
Emergency Response
Enforcement
Exposure AssessVRisk Assess.
Federal Facilities
Fund Balancing
Grants
Natural Resource Damages
NBARs
NCP
Notification
NPL
86
1 2
9
24
7
85
7
1 3
57
0
0
32
5
1 4
0
26
18
13
8
1
0
2
33
50
124
Off-Site Policy
1 3
On-OSite Policy
csw
PA/SI
PRPs
Public Participation
Radon
RCRA Interface
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
Response
RI/FS
ROD
FQ
SARA Interface
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
State Program
Taxes
Title lll/Right-to-Know
CERCLA Document Requests
CERCLA SUBTOTOAL
1 1
2
1 0
1
15
1 7
1
1 2
23
1 7
0
40
26
3
1 7
29
21
1 9
2
4
43
255
1 502
TOTAL CALLS, DOCUMENT
REQUESTS and REFERRALS
12,440
T3
-------
Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Information Hotline
Daily/Monthly Summary Report - August 1988
Total Calls: 4,007
Distribution of Calls by EPA
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
International
Manufacturers
20 Food
21 Tobacco
22 Textiles
23 Apparel
24 Lumber & Wood
25 Furniture
26 Paper
27 Printina & Publishing
28 Chemicals
29 Petroleum & Coal
30 Rubber and Plastics
31 Leather
32 Stone. Clay & Glass
33 Primary Metals
34 Fabricated Metals
35 Machinery (Excluding Electri
36 Electrical & Electronic Equiprr
37 Transportation Equipment
38 Instruments
39 Misc. Manufacturing
Not Able to Determine
Total Mfg. (%)
Title III General
§301-3 Emergency Planning
SERCs
Notification
TPQS
Mixtures
Extremely Hazardous Substances
Regions
9%
10%
19%
12%
20%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
1%
0%
1%
1%
2%
3%
0%
2%
1%
:al 1%
ler 4%
2%
1%
1%
4%
42%|
401
214
94
53
72
1 1
290
Total Document Requesl
Total Written Requests:
Region 6
Region 7
Regions
Region 9
Region 10
Unknown
Distributors
Handlers
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/ Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Aoencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Citizens
Indians
Other
Total (%)
Delisting EHS
Exemptions
(Total (%)
s: 1,287
362
8%
4%
3%
1 1%
2%
1%
3%
10%
5%
13%
2%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
3%
1%
2%
2%
3%
0%
1%
1%
0%
3%
0%
2%
7%|
15
16
1 4%|
14
-------
§31 1/S312
General
MSDS Reporting Requirements
Tier l/ll Regulations
Thresholds
OSHA Expansion
Hazard Categories
Mixtures
Exemptions
[Total (%)
§313
General
Form R
Thresholds
Phase II
Phase III
Workshop (Training)
Petitions
Health Effects
Database
Mass Balance Study
[Total (%)
Referrals
oem
Preparedness Staff
OTS Staff
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Regional EPA
TSCA Hotline
Other
Total Referrals
467
399
286
367
264
63
68
167
37%|
836
360
217
70
2
1
22
6
16
0
26%|
1 13
0
6
1 18
10
22
97
366
Document Requests:
No. of Documents Requested:
1,287
3,167
Training: General
§305 Training Grants
§305 Emergency Systems Review
§126 (SARA) Training Regulations
I Total (%)
CEPP: Interim Guide
Chemical Profile
NRT-1
Hazard Analysis
Risk Communication
Title III Workshops
Information Management
Prevention ARIP
Other
(Total (%)
Trade Secrets
(Total (%)
Enforcement
iTotal (%)
Liability
ITotal (%)
Release Notification
General
Notification Requirements
Reportable Quantities
RQsvs.TPQs
CERCLA vs. §304
Transportation
Exemptions
ITotal (%)
8
8
1 9
1 7
1 %
7
13
82
76
4
0
8
1
1 13
6%|
78
1 %l
45
1 %|
4
0 %
66
65
37
21
62
1 7
29
5 %
15
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
IV. PUBLICATIONS - AUGUST 1988
RCRA
The document entitled "1986-1987 Survey of Selected Firms in the Commercial
Hazardous Waste Management Industry" is available from EPA's Office of Policy
Analysis.
The following document is available from the National Technical Information
Service: Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the U.S., 1960-2000; order
number is PB-88-332-780.
The following two documents may be obtained from the RCRA Information
Center:
—Groundwater Monitoring Quality Assurance for RCRA
—RCRA Program Evaluation Guide
The Hotline may take requests for the following documents:
• Federal Register - (8/24/88) Proposed Revisions to Criteria for
Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Landfills (EPA/OSW-FR-88-013);
• Proposed Revisions to Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal
Landfills: A Summary (EPA/530-SW-88-048);
Used Oil Recycling (Brochure) (EPA/530-SW-88-047);
• Federal Register - (7/26/88) Ground-Water Monitoring at Hazardous
Waste Facilities: Proposed Amendments to the Rule (OSW-FR-88-012);
• Federal Register - (8/17/88) Land Disposal Restrictions for First Third
Scheduled Wastes: Final Rule (EPA/OSW-FR-88-011).
CERCLA
The Policy for Listing "Unwilling" Parties on the National Priorities List
(NPL) is available through the Public Information Center.
16
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
V. FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - AUGUST 1988
Former Notices with Open Comment Period
May 5,1988; 53 FR 16086
(interim final rule)
June 2,1988; 53 FR 21040
(notice of data availability)
June 13,1988; 53 FR 22043
(notice of availability)
June 20,1988; 53 FR 23128
(proposed rule)
June 23,1988; 53 FR 23661
(proposed rule with request
comment)
This interim final rule authorizes the
President to pay up to $10,000 to individuals
for information leading to successful
prosecution for a criminal violation under
CERCLA. Comments will be accepted until
September 2,1988.
This notice provides data and requests
comment on issues pertaining to infectious
waste. EPA accepted public comments on
the issues posed in this notice until August 1,
1988.
This notice announces the availability of an
interim final guidance manual entitled
Alternate Concentration Limit Guidance:
Case Studies. EPA accepted comments
until August 12,1988.
This rule grants a petition by proposing to
delete the toxic chemical, melamine, from
the list of toxic chemicals under Section 313
of SARA Title III. Comments on the
delisting of melamine were accepted until
August 19,1988.
This rule proposes to grant delisting petitions
to Bethlehem Steel Corporation and pro-
poses the use of the fate and transport model
to evaluate the waste-specific information in
this petition. Comments on the delisting
petition and the use of the fate and transport
model in evaluating this petition were
accepted until August 8,1988.
17
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
June 24,1988; 53 FR 23978
(proposed rule; National
Priorities List, proposed sites
subject to RCRA Subtitle C
Corrective Action authorities)
June 24,1988; 53 FR 23988
(proposed rule, National
Priorities List, Update #7)
June 27,1988; 53 FR 24141
(availability of two documents
with request for review
and comment)
July 5,1988; 53 FR 25218
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
July 11,1988; 53 FR 26090
(notice of intent to delete)
This rule reproposes 13 sites previously
proposed on the National Priorities List
(NPL) and proposes to drop 30 sites from the
proposed NPL. All 43 sites proposed are
subject to the Subtitle C Corrective Action
Authorities under RCRA. Comments on the
proposal were accepted until August 23,
1988.
This rule is proposing the seventh update to
the National Priorities List (NPL). Proposed
in this rule are 229 new sites, 1 expansion to a
final site, and 4 previously proposed sites.
Comments on the proposal were accepted
until August 23,1988.
This notice announces the availability of two
external review drafts for public review and
comment. The documents involve the
updated assessments for 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlor-
dibenzo-p-Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). The
Agency made these documents available
for public review and comment until July 6,
1988. Comments must be postmarked by
October 5,1988.
Notice of a proposed partial consent decree
pursuant to CERCLA Section 106 and RCRA
Section 7003 in United States vs. V.A. & F.
Materials Company. DOJ will receive
comments for 30 days after the date of this
notice.
This notice announces EPA's intent to delete
the A.L. Taylor site in Brooks, Kentucky from
the National Priorities List. EPA accepted
comments on the deletion until August 10,
1988.
18
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 12,1988; 53 FR 26283
(notice of proposed rule to grant
a petition)
July 13,1988; 53 FR 26455
(notice of proposed to rule
to grant a petition)
July 15,1988; 53 FR 26858
(notice of proposed settlement)
July 15,1988; 53 FR 26859
(notice of proposed settlement)
July 19,1988; 53 FR 27268
(proposal to clarify the
Federally Permitted Release
exemption)
This Federal Register proposes to grant a
petition submitted to North American
Phillips Consumer Electronics Corporation
in Greenville, Tennessee, to exclude certain
solid wastes generated at its facility from the
lists of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
Sections 261.31 and 261.32. Public comments
were accepted until August 26,1988.
This Federal Register proposed to grant a
petition submitted by Goodyear Tire and
Rubber Company, Randleman, North
Carolina to exclude certain solid wastes
generated at its facility from the lists of
hazardous wastes found in 40 CFR Sections
261.31 and 261.32. Comments were
accepted until August 29,1988.
Notice of proposed settlement under
CERCLA Section 122(h) involving claims for
past and oversight costs at the A.Y.
McDonald site in Debuque, Iowa. Comments
were accepted until August 15,1988.
Notice of proposed settlement under
CERCLA Section 122(h) for response cost
claims at the Babb Drum site in Little
Chicago, South Carolina. Comments were
accepted until August 15,1988.
This rule proposes to clarify the Federally
permitted release exemption for hazardous
substances under CERCLA Sections 101(10),
103, and 107 and also, Section 311 of the
Clean Water Act. Comments must be
submitted on or before September 19, 1988.
19
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27371
(notice of Agency's intent to
delete)
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27393
(notice of proposed settlement)
July 20,1988; 53 FR 27411
(lodging of consent decree)
July 22,1988; 53 FR 27679
(notice of proposed rule)
July 26,1988; 53 FR 28160
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
This notice announces the Agency's intent to
delete the Matthews Electroplating site in
Roanoke County, Virginia from the National
Priorities List. Comments were
accepted until August 19,1988.
This notice announces a proposed settlement
under Section 122(h) of CERCLA. The
Agency has decided to settle claims for
response costs at the Salvo Property site in
Lithia Springs, Georgia, with Joseph E. Salvo.
EPA accepted comments on the settlement
for 30 days.
This notice announces the lodging of a
consent decree under CERCLA Sections 104
and 106 in United States vs. Hallie C.
Ormond, C.C. Grisham and Mary F. Burke.
The Department of Justice accepted
comments for 30 days on this action.
This rule announces that the OSHA Hazard
Communication Standard (HCS) was
expanded to non-manufacturing, except
for the construction industry, effective
June 24,1988. However, OSHA will begin
checking for compliance with the HCS in
programmed inspections August 1, 1988.
This is a proposed revision to the Ground-
water Monitoring regulations in 40 CFR Part
264 Subpart F and Part 270. The amendments
that are proposed in this Federal Register are
designed to foster the early detection of leaks
and to better tailor the current ground-water
monitoring regulations to site specific
conditions. EPA will accept public comments
until September 26, 1988.
20
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
July 27,1988; 53 FR 28278
(notice of a proposed consent
decree)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28456
(notice of proposed consent decree)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28414
(notice of EPA's intent to
delete)
July 28,1988; 53 FR 28383
(notice of final rule)
July 29,1988; 53 FR 28772
(notice of final rule)
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in United States vs. Olin Corporation
under Section 122(i) of CERCLA. The
Department of Justice accepted comments on
this action for a 30-day period.
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in the United States vs. CSX
Transportation, Inc., et. al., under Section 122
of CERCLA. The Department of Justice
received public comments for a period of 30
days.
This notice announces EPA's intent to delete
the Presque Isle site in Erie, Pennsylvania
from the National Priorities List. EPA
accepted comments until August 29, 1988.
Notice of EPA's intent to approve Georgia's
hazardous waste program revision for the
hazardous components of radioactive mixed
wastes and for closure, post-closure, and
financial responsibility requirements. EPA
accepted comments until August 29, 1988.
This rule publishes the procedures for claims
of trade secrecy made by facilities reporting
under Sections 303(d)(2) and (d)(3), 311, 312,
and 313 of Title III and for EPA's handling of
such claims for submission and handling of
petitions requesting reviews of trade secrecy
claims, and for disclosure to health
professionals of information claimed as trade
secret.
21
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August Federal Register Notices
August 1,1988; 53 FR 28892
(request for comments on the
use of new data)
August 2,1988; 53 FR 29037
(final rule)
August 2,1988; 53 FR 29058
(proposed rule)
August 2,1988; 53 FR 29166
(proposed rule)
August 2,1988; 53 FR 29067
(proposed delisting)
This notice requests comments on the use of
new data associated with Subtitle D Muni-
cipal Landfills, soil data, and chemical-
specific data in calculating dilution/
attenuation factors (DAFs) of organic
constituents proposed as characteristically
toxic in the June 13,1986 Federal Register.
Comments were accepted until August 31,
1988.
This rule provides a final exclusion from the
list of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
Part 261 for certain solid wastes generated by
Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, New York.
In this notice the EPA proposes to grant a
petition submitted by Vulcan Materials
Company, Port Edwards, Wisconsin, to
exclude on a one-time basis, certain solid
wastes generated at its facility from the list of
hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
Sections 261.31 and 261.32. Comments will
be accepted until September 16,1988.
In this notice the EPA proposes a guideline
for Federal procurement of certain insulation
products containing recovered materials.
The guideline would implement Section
6002(e) of RCRA as amended. EPA will
accept comments on this notice until
September 1,1988.
This notice proposes to grant a petition
submitted by CF & I Steel Corporation,
Pueblo, Colorado, to conditionally exclude
certain solid wastes generated at its facility.
Comments will be accepted until September
16,1988.
22
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 4,1988; 53 FR 29396
(proposed consent decree)
August 4,1988; 53 FR 29428
(proposed rule)
August 5,1988; 53 FR 29460
(state program revisions)
August 5,1988; 53 FR 29461
(state program revisions)
August 5,1988; 53 FR 29484
(notice of intent to delete site
the NPL)
This notice proposes a consent decree
pursuant to CERCLA against Ceramic Tile
Co., et al. Comments will be received for a
period of 30 days after the publication of this
notice.
This proposed rule establishes arbitration
procedures for small Superfund Cost
Recovery claims under CERCLA Section
107(a) and Section 122(h). Comments must
be submitted on or before October 3,1988.
This rule announces EPA's intention to
approve North Carolina's hazardous waste
program revisions and announces the
availability of the revisions for public
review. Comments on the State program
revisions must be received by the close of
business September 6, 1988.
This rule announces EPA's intention to
approve South Carolina's hazardous waste
program revisions and announces the
availability of the revisions for public
review. Comments on the State program
revisions must be received by the close of
business September 6,1988.
This notice announces EPA's intent to delete
the Mowbray Engineering Company site
from the National Priorities List (NPL).
Comments may be submitted on or before
April 29,1989.
23
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 8,1988; 53 FR 29789
(notice of three proposed
consent decrees)
August 8,1988; 53 FR 29789
(notice of proposed partial
consent decree)
August 8,1988; 53 FR 29790
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
August 9, 1988; 53 FR 30002
(notice of comments)
August 9,1988; 53 FR 30005
(policy statement)
This notice announces three proposed
consent decrees in United States vs. Morton
Thiokol, Inc., et. al. under Section 107 of
CERCLA. The consent decrees were lodged
with the U.S. District Court for the District of
New Jersey. The Department of Justice will
receive comments until September 7, 1988.
This notice announces a proposed partial
consent decree in United States vs. Rohm
and Haas Company, Inc., et. al. under Section
107 of CERCLA. The proposed consent
decree was lodged in the U.S. District Court
for the District of New Jersey. The
Department of Justice will receive comments
on this notice for a period of 30 days.
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree under CERCLA Section 107 in United
States vs. Russell Martin Bliss, et. al. The
proposed consent decree was lodged with the
United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, Eastern Division. The
Department of Justice will receive comments
for a period of 30 days on this notice.
This notice solicits comments on additional
criteria for determining when the owner or
operator of a site is considered unable to pay
for addressing the contamination at a RCRA-
regulated site, and therefore, the site should
be proposed for the NPL. Comments may be
submitted on or before October 11,1988.
This notice discusses the Agency's policy for
determining when owners and operators of
RCRA facilities are unwilling to perform
corrective action, and therefore, the site
should be proposed for the NPL.
24
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 9,1988; 53 FR 29988
(notice of correction)
August 9,1988; 53 FR 29959
(announcement of proposed
partial consent decrees)
August 10,1988; 53 FR 30054
(notice of EPA's intent to approve
state program revision)
August 10,1988; 53 FR 30055
(notice of EPA's intent to deny
petitions)
August 10,1988; 53 FR 30120
(notice of proposed consent
decree)
This notice provides a technical correction to
the August 2,1988 Federal Register. The
August 2,1988 Federal Register provided a
final exclusion from the list of hazardous
wastes contained in 40 CFR Part 261 for
certain solid wastes generated by Lederle
Laboratories, Pearl River, New York.
This notice announces two proposed partial
consent decrees in United States vs. Cannon
Engineering Corporation, et. al. under
CERCLA. The consent decrees were lodged
with the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts. The Department
of Justice will receive comments for a period
of 30 days.
This notice announces EPA's intent to
approve New Jersey's application for a State
program revision under RCRA. All
comments on New Jersey's program revision
application must be received by September 9,
1988.
This notice announces EPA's intent to deny
petitions submitted by seven petitioners to
exclude their wastes from the hazardous
waste list found in 40 CFR Part 261.
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in United States vs. City Industries et
al., under CERCLA. The consent decree was
lodged with the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida. The
Department of Justice will receive comments
on this notice for a period of 30 days.
25
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 12,1988; 53 FR 30452
(announcement of EPA's intent
to delete site from the NPL)
August 16,1988; 53 FR 30908
(final rule)
August 17,1988; 53 FR 31000
(final authorization)
August 17,1988; 53 FR 31138
(first third scheduled wastes;
final rule)
August 18,1988; 53 FR 31330
(delisting petition; final rule)
In this notice EPA announces its intent to
delete the Toftdahl Drums Site in Brush
Prairie, Washington, from the NPL. EPA has
determined that the appropriate remedy has
been completed and that the site poses no
further threat to public health or the
environment. Comments on the deletion
will be accepted until September 12,1988.
This rule sets forth effective dates restricting
the disposal of California list wastes (as
defined in Section 3004(d) of RCRA) and
selected wastes under Section 3004(g) of
RCRA by underground injection.
Notice announcing EPA's intent to approve
Mississippi's hazardous waste program
revisions. Mississippi's application for
revision is open for public review and
comments. All comments must be received
by the close of business September 16,1988.
The notice finalizes specific treatment
standards and effective dates for the first
third scheduled wastes, restricting them from
land disposal. This rule was effective on
August 8, 1988 except for the modification to
40 CFR Section 268.5(h)(2) which becomes
effective November 8, 1988.
This rule provides a final exclusion from the
list of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
Part 261 for certain solid wastes generated by
the ELI Lilly and Company at the Clinton,
Indiana facility.
26
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 18,1988; 53 FR 31402
(lodging of stipulation
pursuant to CERCLA)
August 18,1988; 53 FR 31403
(lodging of consent decree
pursuant to CERCLA)
August 22,1988; 53 FR 31871
(final rule)
August 25,1988; 53 FR 32480
(notice announcing proposed
consent decree)
August 29,1988; 53 FR 32899
(notice of hearing date post-
ponement)
This notice announces a proposed
stipulation pursuant to CERCLA against
American Creosote Works of Florida, Inc.
The Department of Justice will receive
comments relating to the proposed
stipulation for a period of 30 days from the
date of this publication.
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree against Louis Serafini et al. pursuant
to CERCLA. The Department of Justice will
receive comments related to the consent
decree for 30 days from the date of this
publication.
The Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) Section
109(e) authorizes the use of other than
competitive procedures, i.e., other than full
and open competition, in procuring the
services of experts for use in preparing or
prosecuting a civil or criminal action under
SARA. This Federal Register establishes a
final rule regarding the EPA's procurement
procedures for contracting for expert services
under Section 109(e) of CERCLA as
amended.
This notice announces a proposed consent
decree in United States vs. Browning Ferris
Industries; Chemical Services, Inc.; and
CECOS International under Section 3008 of
RCRA. The Department of Justice will accept
comments for 30 days.
The notice postpones the North Carolina
withdrawal proceeding hearing date that was
established in the June 7,1988 Federal
Register. 53 FR 20845. It will be postponed
until further notice.
27
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free #800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #202/382-3000
August 29,1988; 53 FR 32949
(proposed partial consent
decree)
August 30,1988; 53 FR 33314
(proposed rule)
August 30,1988; 53 FR 33152
(notice of data availability
extension of comment period)
August 31,1988; 53 FR 33618
(notice of draft guidance, request
for comments)
The notice announces a proposed partial
consent decree in United States vs. McGraw-
Edison Company, et al. pursuant to CERCLA
for its Olean Well Field Site located in Olean,
New York. The Department of Justice will
receive comments for 30 days from the date
of this publication.
The proposal revises the criteria for
classification of solid waste disposal facilities
and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 257.
This proposed action would amend Part 257
by including information requirements for
certain solid waste disposal facilities and sets
forth specific requirements for municipal
solid waste landfills in Part 258. These
specific requirements include: location
restrictions, facility design and operating
criteria, ground-water monitoring
requirements, corrective action, and
closure/post-closure care. Comments must
be submitted on or before October 31,1988.
The notice extends the comment period on
the supplement to the Toxicity Characteristic
proposed rule and use of the ground-water
model for the Delisting Program, which
appeared in the Federal Register on August 1,
1988 (53 FR 28892). The Agency will accept
comments until September 22, 1988.
This notice presents draft guidance to States
for meeting the capacity assurance
requirements under Section 104(c)(9) of
CERCLA as amended by SARA. Comments
must be submitted no later than
September 30,1988.
28
-------
List of Addressees:
Devereaux Barnes, OS-330
Jim Berlow, OS-322
Frank Biros, OS-500
George Bonina, OS-310
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Karen Brown, PM-220
Diane Buxbaum, Region 2
Jon Cannon, OS-100
Jayne Carlin, Region 10
Fred Chanania, LE-132S
Richard Clarizio, Region 5
Kathy Collier, RTF, NC
Elizabeth Cotsworth, OS-343
Wayne Crane, PM-273F
Hans Crump, OS-210
Gordon Davidson, OS-500
Elaine Davies, OS-301
Truett DeGeare, OS-301
Bob Dellinger, OS-332
Jeffery Denit, OS-300
Bruce Diamond, OS-500
Bruce Diamond, OS-500
Melinda Downing, DOE
Karen Ellenberger, OS-100
Tim Fields, OS-210
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
George Garland, OS-342
John Gilbert, EPA-Cin., OH
Al Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR
Lloyd Guerci, OS-500
Matt Hale, OS-340
Lynn Hansen, OS-305
Penny Hansen, OS-230
Bill Hanson, OS-220
Betti Harris, Region 7
Cheryl Hawkins, OS-200
Steve Hooper, OS-500
Irene Horner, WH-595
Barbara Hostage, OS-210
Hotline Staff
Phil Jalbert, OS-240
Alvin K. Joe, Jr., GRC
Gary Jonesi, LE-134S
Jim Jowett, OS-210
Thad Juzczak, OS-100
Bob Kievit, EPA-Olympia, WA
Robert Knox, OS-130
Mike Kosakowski, OS-51
Walter Kovalick, OS-200
Tapio Kuusinen, PM-223
Steve Leifer, LE-134S
Steve Levy, OS-301
Henry Longest, OS-200
Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300
James Makris, OS-120
Joseph Martone, A-104
Scott McPhilamy, Region 3
Margaret Milligan, PM-214F
Royal Nadeau, Region 2
Mike Petruska, OS-332
Lawrence Pratt, TS-779
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Carl Reeverts, WH-550E
John Riley, OS-210
Suzanne Rudzinski, OS-343
Dale Ruhter, OS-320
William Sanjour, OS-332
Pam Sbar, LE-134S
Mike Shannon, OS-310
Mike Shapiro, TS-779
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Jack Stanton, A-101
Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK
Betty VanEpps, OS-240
Anastasia Watson, OS-120
Bruce Weddle, OS-301
Steve Willhelm, Region 7
Dan Yurman, OS-100
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hazardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
29
------- |