UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCV
WASHINGTON, D.C 20460
*- ooo1*
...r . „ 530R91105
AUG I h
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Final Monthly Report—RCRA/Superfund Industry Assistance and
Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Information
Hotline Report for May. 1991
/,,,/.,,/'<
FROM: Barbara Roth, Project Officer
Office of Solid Waste
TO: Addressees
This Report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039.
I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES—MAY 1991
RCRA
1. Comparative Definitions of F001 and F002
Tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene chloride, and 1,1,1-
trichloroethylene are listed in the definitions of both F001 and F002 in 40 CFR 261.31.
The listing for F001 reads "the following spent halogenated solvents used in
degreasing...", while the F002 listing begins with "the following spent halogenated
solvents...". Although F001 applies specifically to solvents used in degreasing
according to the December 31,1985 Federal Register, the F001-F005 listings cover
only those solvents used for their solvent properties. A solvent used in degreasing
is considered to be used for its solvent properties. (50 FR 53316) Thus, a solvent,
which is listed in both F001 and F002 (e.g., methylene chloride) and is used in
degreasing, could be both F001 and F002. Would such a spent solvent be
appropriately classified as F001, F002, or both?
It was not the intent of the Agency to apply both listings to a solvent
constituent which is listed in both F001 and F002. The waste code that the
spent solvent receives depends on the type of degreasing involved. Page 6
of the "Listing of Hazardous Waste (40 CFR 261.31 and 261.32); Identification
and Listing of Hazardous Waste Under RCRA, Subtitle C, Section 3001" (also
known as the Background Listings Document) clarifies the intent of the F001
listing as opposed to other spent solvents. Specifically, the F001 listing is
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
1. Comparative Definitions of F001 and F002 (cont'd)
appropriate when tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene chlor.de,
and 1,1,1-trichloroethane are used in large-scale industrial degreasing
operations [e.g., cold cleaning, vapor degreasing (open top and
conveyorized), and fabric scouring]. Alternatively, tetrachloroethylene,
trichloroethylene, methylene chloride, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane used in
equipment cleaning or in smaller scale degreasing operations involving repair
work (that do not employ industrial degreasing processes as described
above), such as industrial maintenance and repair, commercial service and
repair, and consumer-performed maintenance and repair, receive the F002
listing.
Source: Ron Josephson, OSW (202)475-6715
Research: Peter LeTourneau
2. Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion (MWC) Ash
Two cities have recently constructed combustion facilities to manage municipal solid
waste. The first city has an energy recovery plant, while the second has a non-
energy recovery incinerator. Both units generate a fly and bottom ash. Would these
types of ash be subject to RCRA hazardous waste regulation if the ash exhibited a
toxicity characteristic?
No. The ash would not be subject to the 40 CFR 261.24 toxicity characteristic
(TC) regulation. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted on
November 15,1990; Section 306, entitled "Ash Management and Disposal,"
established that for a period of two years after the date of enactment, MWC
ash from "solid waste incineration units" would not be regulated as a RCRA
Subtitle C waste should it exhibit a hazardous waste characteristic of
ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart C.
(Note: MWC ash would not be regulated as a hazardous waste in 40 CFR
Part 261, Subpart D since it is not a listed source.) The term "ash from solid
waste incineration units burning municipal waste" includes fly and/or
bottom ash from both energy recovery and incineration facilities managing
municipal waste. During the two year moratorium, however, MWC ash
would be subject to: 1) current federal regulations in 40 CFR Part 257
governing the disposal of solid waste, 2) state regulations governing solid
waste disposal; and 3) state regulations governing municipal waste
combustion ash disposal or utilization/reuse, where they exist. See also
Environmental Defense Fund. Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies. Inc.. Docket
No. 90-7437 (2d Cir. April 24,1991).
Source: Andrew Teplitzky, OSW (202) 382-4536
Research: Cynthia Hess
-------
3. Underground Storage Tank Flow-Through Process Tank Exclusion
In a manufacturing operation, a coating, containing regulated substances, is applied
to a metal part that is manufactured on-site. The coating of the metal part is
accomplished in the following steps: After machining processes are completed,
individual metal parts are clipped to the bottom of a chain which is attached at its
top to an overhead conveyor system. The conveyor carries the metal part to an
open-topped tank, containing a coating solution. The tank meets the definition of
"underground" provided in 40 CFR 280.12 Once over the tank, the conveyor system
lowers the metal part into the coating solution. The metal part remains submerged
in the solution as the conveyor travels the length of the tank at the end of which time
the conveyor system raises the metal part out of the tank. The metal part is then
transported via the conveyor to an area were a facility employee unclips the part
and places it on a drying pad. Would this tank be exempt from the UST regulations
of 40 CFR Part 280, under the "flow-through process tank" exclusion of 40 CFR Part
280.12?
Yes, the tank would qualify for the exclusion because it meets the three
necessary conditions to be considered a "flow-through process tank": 1) forms
an integral part of a production process, 2) has a steady, variable, recurring/
or intermittent flow of materials through the tank during the operation of the
process, and 3) is not used for the storage of materials prior to their introduc-
tion into the production process or for the storage of finished products or by-
products from the production process. These conditions are met because the
production process (coating) actually occurs in the tank, therefore it is
integral; and does not store prior to or after production. The flow is
intermittent, satisfying condition 2.
Source: Tom Schruben, OUST (703) 308-8875
Research: Dan Irvin
CERCLA
4. Clarification of CERCLA lll(g). Notice to Potentially Injured Parties
The owner of a facility identifies a release of a hazardous substance that poses a
threat to persons surrounding the facility. The owner is concerned about statutory
and regulatory requirements for notification to potentially injured parties.
According to section 11 Kg) of CERCLA, the President shall promulgate rules and
regulations with respect to notification to be provided to potentially injured parties
from a release of a hazardous substance. CERCLA section 11 Kg) states that "(u)ntil
the promulgation of such rules and regulations, the owner and operator of any
vessel or facility from which a hazardous substance has been released shall provide
reasonable notice to potentially injured parties by publication in the local newspaper
serving the affected area." Have such regulations been promulgated pursuant to
CERCLA section 11 Kg), or does the statute contain the only provision for such
notice?
-------
4. Clarification of CERCLA 11 Kg), Notice to Potentially Injured Parties (confd)
No, regulations have been promulgated pursuant to section 11 Kg) of CERCLA.
Thus an owner or operator would be required to publish notice to potentially
injured parties in a newspaper serving the affected area as provided by the
statute.
Source: Barbara Hostage, OERR-ERD (202) 382-2198
Research: Jonathan Wilk
SARA TITLE III
5. Section 313: Changes in SIC Code
A facility whose SIC code is outside of the manufacturing sector (20-39) believes that
their current SIC code is misrepresentative of the facility's activities. In actuality, the
facility may be better represented by an SIC code within the manufacturing sector. If
the facility changes its SIC code to a manufacturing group should they back report for
calendar years 1987,1988, and 1989 under Section 313 of EPCRA (40 CFR 372)?
If the facility has not altered their operations and should have been classified
as a manufacturing facility, they should report for all the previous years under
Section 313 of EPCRA. If the mix of activities at the facility shifted from non-
manufacturing to manufacturing (activities within SIC codes 20-39), then they
should begin reporting with the year in which the mix changed to
manufacturing activities.
Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960
Research: Tami McNamara
6. Section 313: Reporting Obligation
A facility receives a shipment of gasoline from a tank-truck. The loading dock is
located within the facility boundaries. The tank-truck delivers gasoline through a
hose into the tank operated by the facility. While stationed at the dock, the valve of
the tank-truck ruptures and the gasoline leaks from the hose of the tank-truck. This
release occurs before the shipping papers are signed off by the facility operator.
Gasoline contains listed Section 313 chemicals such as benzene. If an activity
threshold for benzene is met, would the facility report this release of benzene under
Section 313 of Title m (40 CFR 372)?
No. In the above case, the chemicals in the tank-truck are considered in
transport until shipping papers are signed for at the loading dock. Section 327
of the statute states that "(e)xcept as provided in Section 304, this title does not
apply to the transportation, including the storage incident to such
transportation, of any substance or chemical subject to the requirements of this
-------
7. Section 313: Reporting Obligation (cont'd)
title, including the transportation and distribution of natural gas." In the
above scenario, the material in the tank-truck is considered to fall under the
transportation exemption, and releases from this truck would be exempt from
reporting under Section 313. This release however would be reportable
under Section 304 of Title HI, if the quantity of any Extremely Hazardous
Substances (EHS) released exceeds the RQ within a period of 24 hours.
Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960
Research: Dipti Singh
8. Section 313: Employee Threshold
A facility covered under Section 313 of EPCRA (40 CFR 372) has nine full-time
employees and one part-time employee. The facility also has an employee who
works at the facility, but does not draw a salary. Should the hours worked by the
employee who does not draw a salary be counted towards the employee threshold
for the facility?
Yes. Even though the employee does not draw a salary he/she is still
working at the facility. Any hours worked by an employee at the facility
must be counted towards that facility's employee threshold.
Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960
Research: Tami McNamara
-------
II. ACTIVITIES -MAY 1991
1. The RCRA/Super fund Hotline and the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Hotline responded to 18,245 questions, referrals and requests for
documents in May. The breakdown is as follows:
RCRA Superfund UST CEPP
Ir formation Questions 6,509 1,105 542 3,736= 11,892
Call Document Requests* 2,235 288 152 1,165= 3,840
Referrals "2.000 — ***513 = 2,513
Totals 10,744 1,393 694 5,414= 18,245
* This number represents both written and verbal document requests.
** This number represents all referrals made by the RCRA/Super fund/UST
section of the Hotline.
*** This number represents all referrals made by the CEPP section of the Hotline.
RCRA/Superfund/CEPP Hotline Activities
During the month of May, the Hotline staff met with a representative from Labat-
Anderson to discuss the Superfund Health Risk Support Center in Cincinnati, Ohio.
The Hotline Information Specialists attended the Title III Implementation work
group meeting and OUST staff meeting. The Hotline staff provided research
projects: i.e., analysis of the burning of hazardous waste in Boilers and Industrial
Furnace Rule. Routine administrative meetings were held with the Project Officers
and Hotline program managers.
-------
III. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS—May 1991
RCRA/Superfund/UST
Summary of Calls by EPA Region
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Region 6
Total Questions:
Total Documents Requests:
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
556
1,057
1,887
1,219
1,612
1,021
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
International Calls
8,156
2,675
365
486
1,695
448
14
Calls
Manufacturers
Generators
Transporters
TSDFs
EPAHQ
EPA Regions
Federal Agencies
State Agencies
Local Agencies
Used Oil Handlers
UST O/O
RCRA
General Information
§3010 Notification
§260.10 Definitions
§260.22 Petitions/Delisting
§261 .2 Solid Waste Definition
§261.3 Haz. Waste Definition
§261 C Char. Haz. Waste
§261 D Listed Haz. Waste
§261.4 Exclusions
§261.5 Small Quantity Generators
§261.6 Recycling Standards
§261.7 Container Residues
§262 Generator-General
§262 100- 1000 kg/mo
§262 Manifest Information
§262 Accumulation
§262 Recordkeeping & Reporting
§262 International Shipments
963
842
118
350
43
146
249
405
153
89
180
560
186
142
26
216
417
635
526
290
104
163
60
233
43
. 94
160
28
38
Consultants
Attorneys
Laboratories
Univ ./Researchers
Trade Associatons
Insurance Co.'s
Environmental Groups
Press
Citizens
Other
TOTAL
§263 Transporters
§266 C Use Constituting Disposal
§266 D HW Burned for Energy Rec.
§266 E Used Oil Burned for Energy Recovery
§266 F Precious Metal Reclamation
§266 G Spent Lead— Acid Battery Reclamatior
Subtitle D: Municipal Solid Waste
Subtitle D: Other
Asbestos/PCBs/Radon
Corrective Action
Dioxins
Household Hazardous Waste
Medical/Infectious Waste
Liability/Enforcement
Minimum Technology
Mixed Radioactive Waste
Used Oil
Waste Minimization
2,804
1,131
249
292
105
101
89
126
1,492
433
10,360
65
23
97
19
31
144
93
41
55
123
33
78
71
21
11
49
115
13
-------
RCRA-TSDF/264 and 265
A Scope/Applicability
8 General Facility Standards
C Preparedness/Prevention
D Contingency Plans
E Manifest/Recordkeeping/Rptg.
F Groundwater Monitoring
G Closure/Post Closure
H Financial Requirements
1 Containers
J Tank*?
K Surface Impoundments
I Waste Piles
M Land Treatment
N Landfills
Liquids in Landfills
O Incinerators
P Thermal Treatment
Q Chem., Phys., Biol Treatment
R Underground Injection
130
43
17
14
28
52
71
29
44
89
36
9
9
20
0
39
4
5
0
X Miscellaneous
§268 General
§268 Solvent & Oioxins
§268 California List Wastes
§268 Schedled Thirds
§269 Air Emissions Standards
§270 A General
§270 B Permit Application
§270 D Changes to Permits
§270 F Special Permits
§270 G Interim Status/LOIS
§271 State Programs
§1 24 Administrative Procedures
DOT Requirements
OSHA Requirements/HW Training
Test Methods/HW Technologies
RCRA Questions
RCRA Document Requests
11
205
22
29
158
0
59
42
24
11
15
36
2
38
13
202
6,509
2,235
Underground Storage Tanks
General
§280.10 Applicability
§280.11 Interm Prohibition
§280.12 Definitions - General
UST
Regulated Substance
§280 B New UST Systems - General
§280.20 Performance Stds.
§280.21 Upgrading
§280.22 Notification
§280 C General Operating Req.
§280 0 Release Detection
§280 E Release Rpt. & Investigation
56
44
2
46
7
9
6
9
10
22
12
44
20
§280 F Corrective Action Petroleum
§280 G Corrective Action
Hazardous Substances
§280 H Out-of-Service/Ctosure
§280 I Financial Responsibility
§281 State UST Programs
Liability
Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
Other Provisions
UST Questions
UST Document Requests
24
11
0
54
89
38
14
8
12
5
542
152
8
-------
CERCLA
Access & Information Gathering
Administrative Record
Allocations from Fund
ARARs
CERCLIS
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Costs
Clean-Up Standards
Community Relations
Contract Lab Program (CLP)
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts
Definitions
Emergency Response
Enforcement
Exposure Assess./Risk Assess.
Federal Facilities
Fund Balancing
General
Grants
Hazardous Substances
Health/Toxics
MRS
Liability
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages
NBARs
87
0
4
38
103
2
11
13
17
9
3
2
19
2
19
12
7
3
32
0
44
2
35
66
0
1
0
NCP
Notification
NPL
Off-Site Policy
On-Srte Policy
OSHA
PA/SI
PRPs
Public Participation
Radon
RCRA Interface
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
Response
RI/FS
ROD
RQ
SARA Interface
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
State Program
Taxes
Title lll/Right-to-Know
CERCLA Questions
CERCLA Document Requests
Referrals
Referrals - EPA HO
Other Hotlines
Regions
State
GPO/NTIS/PIC
ORD/Dockets
Other
SUBTOTAL
55
57
127
7
3
5
9
20
5
0
9
2
24
15
4
29
23
109
6
15
11
3
0
2
34
1,105
288
95
493
172
346
520
122
252
2000
-------
CEPP Total Questions:
Total Document Requests:
Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Information Hotline • May 1991
Distribution of Calls by EPA Regions
Region 1
Region 2
Reg ion 3
Region 4
Region 5
International
350
435
535
622
840
1
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
Unknown
3,736
1,165
336
178
83
433
109
135
Calls
Manufactuers:
Food
Tobacco
Textiles
Apparel
Lumber & Wood
Furniture
Paper
Printing & Publishing
Chemicals
Petroleum & Coal
Rubber and Plastics
Leather
Stone, Clay & Glass
Primary Metals
Fabricated Metals
Machinery (Excluding Electrical)
Electrical& Electronic Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Instruments
Misc. Manufacturing
Not Able to Determine
[SUBTOTAL
|Trtle III General (7.15%)
§301-3 Emergency Planning:
General
SERCs/LEPC
Notification
Mixtures
Extremely Hazardous Substances
Delisting EHS
Exemptions
I SUBTOTAL
149
4
48
6
35
29
46
90
542
69
105
7
61
97
277
74
235
149
14
90
146
2,127
267
56
15
10
5
32
6
2
126
All Others:
Distributors
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/ Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Agencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Citizens
Indians
Other
SUBTOTAL
(Mfg & All Others)
§311/312:
General
MSDS Reporting Requirements
Tier I/I I Regulations
Thresholds
OSHA Expansion
Hazard Categories
Mixtures
Exemptions
(SUBTOTAL (18.04%)
90
128
658
40
19
27
64
3
72
9
75
33
33
4
47
30
4
154
0
190
370
2,050
4,323
219
65
221
99
13
16
5
36
674|
10
-------
§313:
Form R
Thresholds
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Workshop (Training)
Petitions
Health Effects
Database
Exemptions
(SUBTOTAL (64.37%)
Release Notification:
General
Notification Requirements
Reportable Quantities
RQs vs. TPQs
Transportation
Exemptions
I SUBTOTAL (3.67%)
Training:
General
§305 Training Grants
§305 Emergency Systems Review
§126 (SARA) Training Regulations
ISUBTOTAL (0.11%)
General:
CEPP Interim Guide
Chemical Profile
NRT-1
Hazard Analysis
Risk Communication
Title III Workshops
Information Management
Prevention ARIP
Glher
SUBTOTAL (2.38%)
Trade Secrets (0.16%)
Enforcement (0.54%)
Liability (0.21%)
CEPP Questions
CEPP Document Requests
1,317
261
421
146
26
2
49
12
52
119
2,405|
61
31
27
12
2
4
137|
0
0
0
4
41
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
86
89
6
20
8
3,736
1,165
Referrals
OSHA
Preparedness Staff
OTS Staff
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Regional EPA
TSCA Hotline
State/SERC
TRIUS
40
1
19
95
18
33
78
72
Other
157
ISUBTOTAL
513
RCRA/SUPERFUND UST/EPCRA
QUESTIONS, DOCUMENTS REQUESTS
AND REFERRALS
GRAND TOTAL
18,245
11
-------
IV. PUBLICATIONS - MAY 1991
RCRA/SF
The following document is available through the National Technical Information
Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield , VA 22161, (703) 487-4650.
Subject State Programs Advisory
"State Program Advisory No. 8," (Policy Directive No. 9541.00-13). NTIS Order
No.: PB91-179168.
The following documents are available through the RCRA/SF Hotline:
Subject Petroleum Refinery/Separation Sludge
"Hazardous Waste Management System; ID and Listing of Hazardous Waste;
CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation Petroleum Refinery Primary and
Secondary Oil/Water/Solids Separation Sludge Listings (F037 and F038);"
Interim Final Rule; May 13,1991. The Order No. is OSW-FR-91-019.
"Environmental Fact Sheet: EPA Amends Primary Petroleum Sludge Listing,"
May 20,1991. The Order No. is EPA/530-SW-91-048.
Subject: Mineral Processing
"Environmental Fact Sheet: Agency Determines Final Regulatory Status of
Special Wastes from Mineral Processing," May 20,1991. The Order No. is
EPA/530-SW-91-053.
"Final Regulatory Determination for Special Wastes from Mineral Processing,"
May 20,1991. The Order No. is OSW-FR-91-018.
12
-------
V.
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - MAY 1991
Former Notices With Open Comment Periods
October 17,1990 (55 FR 42067)
(Notice)
March 8,1991 (55 FR 9948)
(Notice of Grant Availability)
March 21,1991 (56 FR 12094)
(Notice of Grant Availability)
March 27,1991 (56 FR 12826)
(Reportable Quantity Adjustments)
This notice contains the fourth list of
hazardous substances that will be the subject
of the Agency for Toxic Substance and
Disease Regulatory (ATSDR) toxicological
profiles. The length of the comment period is
unspecified.
EPA issued a notice of availability of
$800,000.00 in funds from the Office of Toxic
Substances (OTS) to be used to improve TRI
data management. These funds will be made
available to States, Indian Tribes and U.S.
Territories after review of applications. A
letter of intent must be submitted by April 8,
1991, and an application package by June 6,
1991.
EPA issued a notice of grant availability of
$1.2 million in funds from the Chemical
Emergency Preparedness and Prevention
Office (CEPPO). These funds will be used to
enhance the SARA Title HI programs of
States, Indian Tribes and U.S. Territories. A
letter of intent to participate is due by
April 18,1991. Completed applications must
be sent by June 21,1991.
EPA is proposing to adjust the reportable
quantities (RQs) for F037 and F038 wastes
(sludges from petroleum refinery separation
processes) under CERCLA. Comments must
be submitted on or before May 28,1991.
13
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 2,1991 (56 FR 13411)
(Immediate Final Rule)
April 3, 1991 (56 FR 13595)
(Immediate Final Rule)
April 3,1991 (56 FR 13644)
(Notice of Proposed Settlement)
April 3,1991 (56 FR 13653)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA is granting final authorization for
Oklahoma's State hazardous waste
management program. The effective date is
June 3,1991, unless EPA rublishes a prior
Federal Register action withdrawing this
immediate final rule. Comments on the
Oklahoma program revision will be
received until May 2, 1991.
Illinois has applied for final authorization of
revisions to its hazardous waste program
under RCRA. EPA is granting final
authorization to Illinois, subject to public
review and comment, to operate an •
expanded program, subject to authority
retained by EPA under the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. Final
authorization shall be effective June 3,1991,
unless EPA publishes a prior Federal
Register action withdrawing this immediate
final rule. All comments must be received
by May 3,1991.
EPA has agreed to settle claims for response
costs under section 122(h) of CERCLA at the
Tartar Farms Site in Somerset, Kentucky
with Cooper Industries, Inc. EPA will
receive comments until May 3,1991.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is giving
notice of a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Midwest Solvent Recovery,
Inc., Civil Action No. H-79-556. This action
was brought against the defendant, also
known as Perm Central Corporation,
pursuant to CERCLA relating to an Order of
EPA for the Cleanup of the Midco n
CERCLA facility located at 5900 Industrial
Highway in Gary, Indiana, and for the
recovery of costs incurred by the United
States in connection with the facility. DOJ
will receive comments until May 3,1991.
14
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Xational Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 8, 1991 (56 FR 14203)
(Immediate Final Rule)
April 9,1991 (56 FR 14341)
(FACA Committee Meeting)
April 10,1991 (56 FR 14474)
(Immediate Final Rule)
April 10,1991 (56 FR 14537)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA is granting final authorization to Ohio,
subject to public review and comment, for
revisions to its hazardous waste program
under RCRA. The effective date is June 7,
1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal
Register action withdrawing this immediate
final rule. Comments on the Ohio program
revision will be received until May 8,1991.
The Federal Advisory Committee is giving
notice of a final meeting of the Committee to
negotiate a rule to recycle lead acid batteries.
The purpose of this meeting is to reach
consensus on a regulatory option for
recycling of lead acid batteries. The meeting
is open to the public and will be held on
May 1,1991, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at
the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Rosslyn, 1401
Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia.
North Carolina has applied for final
authorization of revisions to its hazardous
waste program under RCRA. EPA is
granting final authorization to North
Carolina, subject to public review and
comment, to operate an expanded program,
subject to authority retained by EPA under
the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984. Final authorization
shall be effective June 9,1991, unless EPA
publishes a prior Federal Register action
withdrawing this immediate final rule. All
comments must be received by May 10,1991.
DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Dow Corning
Corporation. The Consent Decree was
lodged with the United States District Court
for the Western District of Kentucky to
recover $58,078.37 to reimburse the
Superfund for costs incurred by the United
States in responding to the presence of
hazardous substances at the Howe Valley
Superfund Site. DOJ will receive comments
through May 10,1991.
15
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free 4 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 12,1991 (56 FR 15020)
(Proposed Rule)
April 15,1991 (56 FR 15096)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
April 15,1991 (56 FR 15080)
(Notice for Public Comment)
EPA is proposing treatment standards
under the land disposal restrictions
program for wastes identified as K061 that
are non waste waters and contain equal to or
greater than 15% total zinc, determined at
the point of generation. This action
proposes these treatment standards based
on the analysis of nonwastewater residues
from high temperature metals recovery
processes. Comments on the proposed rule
must be submitted on or before May 13,
1991.
DOJ is giving notice that a proposed
Consent Decree in United States v. C. Robert
Ivey, et al., was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Eastern District
of Michigan. The proposed Consent Decree
concerns the hazardous waste site known as
the Liquid Disposal, Incorporated (LDI), site
located in Shelby Township, Macomb
County, Michigan. Under the terms of the
Consent Decree, the United States will
obtain judgments against each of three
defendants, Chemical Recovery Systems,
Holly Container Corporation, and Gordan
Ver Hulst, for $4.8 million and will receive
payments totaling $265,000 as reimburse-
ment to the United States for its response
costs at the LDI Site. DOJ will receive
comments on the proposed Consent Decree
until May 15,1991.
EPA is proposing to enter into two de
minimis administrative settlements to
resolve claims for recovery of costs incurred
at the McKin Superfund Site in Gray, Maine,
under the authority of CERCLA. Notice is
being published to inform the public of the
proposed settlements and of the
opportunity to comment. EPA will receive
written comments relating to the settlements
until May 15,1991.
16
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toil Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 16,1991 (56 FR 15347)
(Meeting)
April 17,1991 (56 FR 15503)
(Immediate Final Rule)
April 18,1991 (56 FR 15932)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
April 22,1991 (56 FR 16276)
(Notice of Tentative Determination)
The Science Advisory Board's (SAB's)
Explosives and Flammables Criteria
Subcommittee (EFCs) of the Environmental
Engineering Committee (EEC), will conduct
a review of the Agency's technical issues
relating to explosives ind flammables
criteria. The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, May 29, 1991.
EPA is granting final authorization to South
Dakota, subject to public review and
comment, for revisions to its hazardous
waste program under RCRA. The effective
date is June 17, 1991, unless EPA publishes a
prior Federal Register action withdrawing
this immediate final rule. Comments on the
South Dakota program revision will be
received until May 17,1991.
DOJ is giving notice that a proposed
Consent Decree in United States v.
Allworth. Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. 91-
30070/RV was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Northern
District of Florida. The proposed Consent
Decree concerns the clean-up of the Dubose
Oil Products Site in Escambia County,
Florida. DOJ will receive comments until
May 18,1991.
EPA has received a complete application
from the State of New Hampshire request-
ing final approval of its underground
storage tank (UST) program under Subtitle I
of RCRA. EPA has reviewed the application
and has made the tentative decision that
New Hampshire's UST program satisfies all
of the requirements necessary to qualify for
final approval. New Hampshire's applica-
tion is now available for public review and
copying. A public hearing is scheduled for
May 23,1991. Requests to present oral
testimony must be filed by May 17,1991.
EPA will also accept public comments until
May 23,1991.
17
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free rf 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 22,1991 (56 FR 16332)
(Notice)
April 23,1991 (56 FR 18517)
(Immediate Final Rule)
In compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been tor warded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and comment. The ICR pertains
to Section 123 of CERCLA, local government
reimbursement for costs incurred in
carrying out temporary emergency
measures necessary to prevent or mitigate
injury to human health or the environment
associated with the release or threatened
release of any hazardous substances
contaminant. This information collection
requires applicants for reimbursement to
submit an application package demonstrat-
ing the financial burden, and a consistency
in the response with program eligibility
criteria. Comments must be submitted on
or before May 22,1991.
Michigan has applied for final authorization
for revisions to its hazardous waste
program under RCRA. EPA is granting
final authorization to Michigan, subject to
public review and comment, to operate an
expanded program, subject to authority
retained by EPA under the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. Final
authorization shall be effective June 24,
1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal
Register action withdrawing this immediate
final rule. All comments must be received
by May 23,1991.
18
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 29, 1991 (56 FR 19691)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
April 30,1991 (56 FR 19805)
(Notice of Michigan's Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
DOJ is giving notice that on April 18, 1991, a
Consent Decree in United States v.
Hercules Incorporated, et ah. was lodged
with the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware. This is the second
Consent Decree lodged in this action. The
amended complaint filed by the United
States on December 27,1990, alleges that
Hercules Inc., et al., are responsible to
reimburse the United States costs totaling in
excess of $2.1 million incurred by the EPA
between November 1,1979 and April 22,
1988 in response to the release and
threatened release of hazardous substances
from the Delaware Sand and Gravel Landfill
Superfund Site in New Castle County,
Delaware. DOJ will receive comments
relating to the proposed Consent Decree
until May 29, 1991,
EPA promulgated on September 22, 1986,
amendments to the deadlines for State
program modifications and published
requirements for States to be placed on a
compliance schedule to adopt necessary
program modifications. In this notice, EPA
is publishing a compliance schedule for
Michigan to modify its program in accord-
ance with section 271.21 (g) to adopt Federal
program modifications. Michigan expects
to submit an application to the EPA
requesting authorization for the necessary
program revisions by February 28,1992.
19
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free * 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
April 30,1991 (56 FR 19852)
(Notice)
April 30,1991 (56 FR 19853)
(Notice; Request for Public Comment)
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act, this notice announces that an
Information Collection Request has been
forwarded to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and comment. The
Technology Innovation Office of the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response is
planning a voluntary and on-going request
for information from developers and vendors
of new treatment technologies that address
contaminated hazardous waste sites. The
survey form will collect both general
company information and technology
specific data. Comments must be submitted
on or before May 30,1991.
EPA is proposing to enter into a cost
recovery settlement agreement under section
122(h)(l) of CERCLA. This proposed
settlement is intended to resolve the liability
of over 50 parties for response costs incurred
at the Try-Chem Site in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin. This notice seeks to elicit public
comments to the Try-Chem Site Cost
Recovery Settlement Agreement pursuant to
section 122(i) of CERCLA. Comments must
be received on or before May 30,1991.
20
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
MAY FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
May 1,1991 (56 FR 19951)
(Administrative Stay)
May 2,1991 (56 FR 20223)
(Notice of Meeting)
May 6, 1991 (56 FR 20548)
(Notice of Availability)
EPA is announcing an administrative stay of
a portion of the K069 hazardous waste
listing. Effective May 1,1991, the listing
does not apply to slurries generated from air
pollution control devices that are intended
to capture acid gases and are not dedicated
chiefly to control of particulate air
emissions. In the near future, EPA intends
to propose to amend the language of the
K069 listing to clarify the scope of listing.
The administrative stay will remain in effect
until 30 days after completion of that
rulemaking.
EPA's Risk Assessment Forum is sponsoring
a workshop to obtain scientific peer review
of an EPA report that describes general
principals for ecological risk assessment.
The workshop will begin May 14, 1991, and
end May 16th.
Pursuant to Section 6002 of RCRA, EPA has
issued a series of guidelines designed to
encourage the Federal Government's use of
products containing materials recovered
from solid waste. On June 22,1988 (40 CFR
Part 250; 53 FR 23546), EPA published
general guidelines for purchasing recycled
paper and paper products. This notice
provides specific information intended to
facilitate Federal procurement of paper and
paper products containing recovered
materials.
21
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9310
May 7,1991 (56 FR 21082)
(Notice of Nebraska Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
May 7, 1991 (56 FR 21174)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 7,1991 (56 FR 21175)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
In accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 (g), EPA is
publishing a compliance schedule for
Nebraska to adopt the Federal program
modifications into its State hazardous waste
program. Nebraska received final
authorization of its hazardous waste
management program on February 7, 1985
(50 FR 38950; October 4,1988). EPA is
currently reviewing an authorization
request for the first cluster of 1984 HSWA
authorities and two more clusters of non-
HSWA authorities. Today's compliance
schedule is for Nebraska to obtain program
modifications for some provisions in the
fifth non-HSWA cluster. Nebraska expects
to submit a final application for authoriza-
tion of these program revisions by March 1,
1992.
DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Armstrong World
Industries, Inc., et. al.. No. 89-4346. The
Consent Decree, which was lodged with the
United States District Court for the District
of New Jersey, embodies an agreement by
21 potentially responsible parties at the
Lone Pine Landfill site. The United States
seeks to recover $4,400,000.00 for past costs
incurred by EPA in connection with the first
operable unit of the site. DOJ will receive
comments through June 6,1991.
Pursuant to Section 122 of CERCLA, DOJ
has lodged a Consent Decree with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of Oklahoma in the case of
United States v. Asarco. et al. Under the
terms of the proposed Consent Decree, the
defendants agree to pay $1,273,000.00 in
reimbursement of response costs incurred in
connection with the Government's
investigation study and remediation at Tar
Creek Site. DOJ will receive comments
through June 6,1991.
22
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free tt 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
(Proposed Rule)
May 10,1991 (56 FR 21601)
(Immediate Final Rule)
EPA proposes to add the White Chemical
Corporation site in Newark, New Jersey, to
the NPL. This action is taken pursuant to
Section 105(a)(8)(B) of CERCLA and Section
300.425(e) of the NCP. The Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) has issued a public health
advisory due to the threat of catastrophic
releases posed by the uncontrolled storage
of hazardous substances at the site, reports
of adverse health effects in nearby worker
populations, and the evidence of continuous
airborne releases from the site. The public
comment period on this notice extends
through May 9,1991.
The Agency has reviewed Colorado's
application for final authorization of its
hazardous waste program under RCRA and
has made the decision that the Colorado
program revision satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for final
authorization. Thus, Colorado now has
primary responsibility for carrying out the
RCRA program within its borders.
Approval of the Colorado hazardous waste
program shall become effective in 60 days
unless an adverse comment is received by
June 10,1991. In the event that an adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
either a withdrawal of the immediate final
decision, or a notice containing a response
to comments which affirms or reverses the
immediate final decision.
23
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington IX Metro #703/920-9810
May 10,1991 (56 FR 21603)
(Notice of Final Determination)
May 13,1991 (56 FR 21955)
(Interim Final Rule with Request for
Comments)
The State of Georgia has applied for final
approval of its underground storage tank
program under Subtitle I of RCRA. EPA has
determined, subject to public review and
comment, that the Georgia Underground
Storage Tank Program satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for final
approval. All comments on the Georgia final
approval application must be received by the
close of business on June 10,1991. Final
authorization for the Georgia underground
storage tank program shall be effective at
1:00 p.m. on July 9,1991, unless EPA
publishes a prior Federal Register action
withdrawing this final rule.
On November 2,1990 (55 FR 46354), EPA
added two wastes to 40 CFR 261.31. Those
wastes, designated as F037 and F038, are
generated in the primary and secondary
separation of oil/water/solids from petro-
leum refinery process wastewater and oily
cooling wastewaters. New information
acquired by the Agency since the promulga-
tion of these listings indicates that certain
separation sludges included within the listing
are not similar in constituent concentration or
oil/grease content to other sludges generated
in the separation of oil/water/solids from
petroleum refinery process wastewaters and
oily cooling waters. Based on the newly
received information, the Agency is
promulgating an interim final rule revising
the definition of wastes subject to F037 and
F038 listings to state that sludges from non-
contact, once-through cooling waters are not
included. The Agency is also amending the
definition of F038 to clarify that floats
generated in aggressive biological treatment
units are not included in the listing
description. The interim final rule is effective
on May 2,1991. Comments on today's action
and any additional data must be received on
or before June 30,1991.
24
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 15,1991 (56 FR 22448)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 16, 1991 (56 FR 22739)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
DOJ is giving notice that a proposed
Consent Decree in United States v. Barker, et
a_L Civil Action No. C-1-90-345, was lodged
with the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio on April 26,1991.
The proposed Consent Decree should
reimburse the United States for costs
incurred while performing an emergency
removal action at the Liquid Waste
Management Site. DOJ will receive
comments through May 14,1991.
DOJ is providing notice of a proposed
Consent Decree in the case of United
States v. Chromalloy American Corporation
and Sequa Corporation, Civil Action No.
MO-91CA57. The Consent Decree, lodged
with the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas, settles the
Government's claims in the complaint
against Chromalloy American Corporation,
et al., pursuant to sections 104,106, and 107
of CERCLA. Under the terms of the
proposed Consent Decree, the defendants
agree to implement the remedy selected by
EPA in its Record of Decision, and to pay the
United States the sum of $695,265.00 for the
United States' past costs at the site,
additional costs not to exceed $61,000.00 and
all future oversight costs. DOJ will receive
comments through June 15,1991.
25
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro ^703/920-9810
Mayl6, 1991 (56 FR 21740)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 16, 1991 (56 FR 22715)
(Notice; Request for Public Comment)
May 17,1991 (56 FR 22869)
(Notice of Meetings)
Pursuant to section 122(d)(2)(B) of CERCLA,
DOJ is giving notice that a Consent Decree
was lodged with the United States District
Court for the District of Arizona in United
States v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company,
et al. The Consent Decree provides that
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, et al.,
will clean up the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport
Superfund site as required by the EPA's
Record of Decision. The parties will agree
to pay 1.5 million dollars in past response
costs incurred by EPA, as well as $75,333.00
to the State of Arizona and all future
response and oversight costs incurred by
EPA. DOJ will receive public comments
through June 15,1991.
EPA is issuing notice of a proposed
administrative cost recovery settlement for
the Delmar Drum Site in St. Louis, Missouri.
The settlement resolves an EPA claim under
section 107 of CERCLA for a Section
122(h)(l) agreement against Sinclair and
Rush, Inc. The settlement requires the
setting party to pay $219,020.39 to the
Hazardous Substances Superfund. EPA will
receive comments through June 15,1991.
EPA is announcing four workshops
sponsored by the Risk Assessment Forum to
obtain scientific peer-review for approxi-
mately 20 ecological risk assessment case
studies. The workshops will be held in
Bethesda, Maryland on May 29 and 30; m
Dallas, on June 4 and 5; in Seattle on June 11
and 12; and in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, on
June 18 through 20,1991.
26
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 22,1991 (56 FR 23598)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 23,1991 (56 FR 23650)
(Final Rule)
May 23,1991 (56 FR 23668)
(Withdrawal of Proposed Rule)
Pursuant to Section 122(d)(2) of CERCLA,
EPA is giving notice that a proposed Partial
Consent Decree in United States v. Intel
Corporation and Raytheon Company was
lodged with the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. This
Consent Decree provides for partial
remediation of a groundwater contamina-
tion site in Mountain View, California, and
reimbursement of past and future costs
incurred by the United States in connection
with the site. The DOJ will receive
comments through June 21,1991.
This rule delists Pigment Blue 15, Pigment
Green 7 and Pigment Green 36 from "copper
compounds" catagory on the Section 313
toxic chemical list of EPCRA. This rule will
relieve facilities from reporting the releases
of these compounds that occurred in 1990
and in subsequent years.
EPA is withdrawing its proposal granting
two petitions to exempt barium sulfate from
the reporting requirements under the
catagory "barium compounds" of the list of
toxic chemicals under Section 313 of
EPCRA.
May 23,1991 (56 FR 23703)
(Notice)
This document outlines EPA's policy
concurring the provisions for petitions to
delist individual members of the metal
compound catagories reportable under
Section 313 of EPCRA of 1986. This
document also provides guidance regarding
the appropriate support documentation that
will be necessary to allow the Agency to
make decisions on such petitions.
27
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9&6, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 23,1991 (56 FR 23724)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 23, 1991 (56 FR 23648)
(Immediate Final Rule)
May 28,1991 (56 FR 24070)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
DOJ is providing notice that a proposed
Consent Decree has been lodged with the
United States District Court for the Northern
District of Ohio in the case of United States v.
Gencorp, Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. 5:89
CV1866. This action, brought pursuant to
section 107 of CERCLA, would resolve claims
for recovery of response costs that the United
States has incurred in connection with the
Fields Brook site in Ashtabula, Ohio. The
proposed Consent Decree would also resolve
counterclaims that settling defendants have
asserted against the United States in United
States v. Gencorp, Inc., (Civil Action No.
5:89CV1866, Northern District of Ohio). DOJ
will receive comments through May 22,1991.
The State of Utah is applying for final
authorization of its hazardous waste program
under RCRA. EPA has made a decision,
subject to public review and comment, that
Utah's program revisions satisfy all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for final
authorization. Final authorization for Utah
shall be effective July 22,1991, unless EPA
publishes a prior Federal Register action
withdrawing this immediate final rule.
Comments must be received by the close of
business June 22,1991.
EPA is giving notice of a proposed
administrative costs recovery settlement
entered into by EPA Region DC and the
Special Master appointed by the United States
District Court for the Northern District of
California to oversee the assets of the Pacific
States Steel Corporation (PSSC). The
proposed settlement provides that PSSC will
reimburse EPA within three years for all cost
incurred at, or in conjunction with, an
emergency removal at the PSSC site in Union
City, California. EPA will receive comments
until June 27,1991.
28
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 30,1991 (56 FR 24444) EPA is requesting data and comments on
(Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) possible BOAT, treatment capacity and
treatment standards for certain wastes listed
as hazardous since enactment of the 1984
HSWA amendments/ and for contaminated
debris. In addition, the Agency is soliciting
comments on several other provisions of the
Land Disposal Restrictions, such as potential
universal treatment standards for various
categories of wastes, modification to the
treatment standards for F001-F005 solvent
wastes and modifications of treatment
standards for lab packs. The comment
period on waste minimization issues ends on
July 29,1991. All other comments on this
Notice must be submitted on or before July 1,
1991.
May 31,1991 (56 FR 24834)
(Notice of Joint Stipulation for Entry of
Judgment)
DOJ is providing notice of a proposed Joint
Stipulation for Entry of Judgment in United
States v. Burrow, et al.. Civil Action No. K88-
128-A8. The Joint Stipulation was lodged
with the United States District Court for the
Western District of Michigan. This proposed
action resolves the judicial enforcement
action brought by the United States against
Auto Specialities Manufacturing Company
pursuant to CERCLA. The proposed Joint
Stipulation provides for the entry of
judgment in the amount of $250,000.00. The
judgment shall be art allowed claim in
bankruptcy pursuant to Section 502 of the
Bankruptcy Code. DOJ will receive
comments through June 30,1991.
29
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free * 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 31,1991 (56 FR 24835)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 31,1991 (56 FR 24835)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
May 31,1991 (56 FR 24803)
(Meeting Announcement)
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree In re Hollingsworth Solderless
Terminal Corporation. The Consent Decree
was lodged with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. Under the proposed
settlement agreement, Hollingsworth
Solderless Terminal Corporation (HSTC)
agrees to pay $130,000.00 to the Hazardous
Substances Superfund and to sell one of its
manufacturing plants and pay 55% of the
net sales proceeds to Superfund. These
funds are being paid to reimburse the
United States for past and future response
actions taken at the HSTC facility in Fort
Lauderdale, Florida. DOJ will receive
comments on this Consent Decree through
June 30, 1991.
DOJ gives notice that proposed Consent
Decree in United States of America v.
Termac, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 91-3042
was lodged with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. The proposed Consent
Decree resolves the liability of Defendants
under CERCLA for the groundwater
contamination at the Bally Engineered
Structures Superfund Site. Defendants
would be required to implement the
June 30,1989 Record of Decision and to pay
$95,000.00 in settlement of past responses
costs. DOJ will receive comments relating to
the proposed Decree through June 30,1991.
EPA is announcing an open meeting of the
Federal Advisory Committee on Mining
Wastes. The purpose of the Committee
meeting is to develop and exchange ideas
about managing mining waste in order to
assist EPA in carrying out its duties under
RCRA. The Committee will meet on June 17
and 18 in Denver, Colorado; and on July 25
and 26 in San Francisco, California.
30
-------
LIST OF ADDRESSEES:
Ed Abrams, OS-332
Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7
Kate Anderson, OS-520
Beih Behrens, EPA-NEIC
Frank Biros, OS-500
KathyBishop,OS-210
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Karen Brown, A-149C
Nancy Browne, OS-520
Jann Buller, BAH
Karen Burgan, OS-110
Edmond Burks, EPA-Reg. 5
Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2
Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1
Richard Clanzio, EPA-Reg. 5
Don R. Clay, OS-100
Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9
Steve Cochran, OS-333
Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama
Hans Crump, OS-210
Becky Cuthbertson, OS-332
Gordon Davidson, OS-500
Elaine Davies, OS-100
Jeffery Demt, OS-300
Lynn DePont, OS-305
Director, RED, LE-134S
Dave Eberly, OS-343
Karen Ellenberger,OS^20
Terry Estardin, CA Dept. of Health
Terry Feldman, OS-120
Tim Fields, OS-2QO
LisaFnedman, LE-132S
John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn.
Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX
Al an Goodman, EPA-Pottland, OR
Knsian Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8
John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2
Janet Grubbs, OS-240
Mary Greene, OS-332
Penny Hansen, OS-230
Bill Hanson, OS-220
Cheryl Hawkins, OS-200
Irene Homer, WH-595
Barbara Hostage, OS-210
Hmton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5
Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4
Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10
Barnes Johnson, OS-311
Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7
Kathy Jones, OS-210
GaryJonesi,LE-134S
Ron Josephson, OS-333
Robert Kayser, OS-333
Mitch Kidwell, OS-332
Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA
William Kline, OS-322W
Robert Knox, OS-130
Mike Kosakowski, OS-510
Walter Kovalick, OS-110
DaveLeotta,'PM-214F
Steve Levy,OS-301
Larry Longanecker, TS-779
Henry Longest, OS-100
Jim Loomis, FL ERC
Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300
Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5
James Makns, OS-120
Andrea McLaughlin, OS-220W
Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7
Dorothy McManus, OS-120
Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3
Ken MitcheU, TS-779
Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7
Royal Nadeau, EPA-Reg. 2
Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6
Susan O'Keefe, LE-134S
Chae Pak, EPA-Reg. 10
Myra Perez, EPA-Houston
Donna Perla, OS-311
Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3
Margaret Pitre, BAH
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9
Barbara Ramsey, OS-120
Carl Reeverts, WH-550E
JohnRiley, OS-210
DaleRuhter, OS-341
William Sanjour, OS-330
Mike Shannon, OS-312
Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Kathie Stein, LE-134S
Beverly Thomas, OS-420
Jim Thompson, OS 520
Linda Thompson, LE-134S
Robert Thompson, A-104
Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK
Harriett Tregomng, PM-220
Betti VanEpps, OS-240
David Van Slyke, LE-134S
Sarah Veale, GAO
Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8
L.C. Waldo, DOE
Howard Wilson, PM-273
Denise Wright, OS -332
Tish Zimmerman, OS-220
OSW Division Directors
OSW Deputy Division Directors
OSW Branch Chiefs
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
------- |