UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCV WASHINGTON, D.C 20460 *- ooo1* ...r . „ 530R91105 AUG I h MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Final Monthly Report—RCRA/Superfund Industry Assistance and Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Information Hotline Report for May. 1991 /,,,/.,,/'< FROM: Barbara Roth, Project Officer Office of Solid Waste TO: Addressees This Report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039. I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES—MAY 1991 RCRA 1. Comparative Definitions of F001 and F002 Tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene chloride, and 1,1,1- trichloroethylene are listed in the definitions of both F001 and F002 in 40 CFR 261.31. The listing for F001 reads "the following spent halogenated solvents used in degreasing...", while the F002 listing begins with "the following spent halogenated solvents...". Although F001 applies specifically to solvents used in degreasing according to the December 31,1985 Federal Register, the F001-F005 listings cover only those solvents used for their solvent properties. A solvent used in degreasing is considered to be used for its solvent properties. (50 FR 53316) Thus, a solvent, which is listed in both F001 and F002 (e.g., methylene chloride) and is used in degreasing, could be both F001 and F002. Would such a spent solvent be appropriately classified as F001, F002, or both? It was not the intent of the Agency to apply both listings to a solvent constituent which is listed in both F001 and F002. The waste code that the spent solvent receives depends on the type of degreasing involved. Page 6 of the "Listing of Hazardous Waste (40 CFR 261.31 and 261.32); Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste Under RCRA, Subtitle C, Section 3001" (also known as the Background Listings Document) clarifies the intent of the F001 listing as opposed to other spent solvents. Specifically, the F001 listing is Printed on Recycled Paper ------- 1. Comparative Definitions of F001 and F002 (cont'd) appropriate when tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene chlor.de, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane are used in large-scale industrial degreasing operations [e.g., cold cleaning, vapor degreasing (open top and conveyorized), and fabric scouring]. Alternatively, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, methylene chloride, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane used in equipment cleaning or in smaller scale degreasing operations involving repair work (that do not employ industrial degreasing processes as described above), such as industrial maintenance and repair, commercial service and repair, and consumer-performed maintenance and repair, receive the F002 listing. Source: Ron Josephson, OSW (202)475-6715 Research: Peter LeTourneau 2. Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion (MWC) Ash Two cities have recently constructed combustion facilities to manage municipal solid waste. The first city has an energy recovery plant, while the second has a non- energy recovery incinerator. Both units generate a fly and bottom ash. Would these types of ash be subject to RCRA hazardous waste regulation if the ash exhibited a toxicity characteristic? No. The ash would not be subject to the 40 CFR 261.24 toxicity characteristic (TC) regulation. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted on November 15,1990; Section 306, entitled "Ash Management and Disposal," established that for a period of two years after the date of enactment, MWC ash from "solid waste incineration units" would not be regulated as a RCRA Subtitle C waste should it exhibit a hazardous waste characteristic of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart C. (Note: MWC ash would not be regulated as a hazardous waste in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart D since it is not a listed source.) The term "ash from solid waste incineration units burning municipal waste" includes fly and/or bottom ash from both energy recovery and incineration facilities managing municipal waste. During the two year moratorium, however, MWC ash would be subject to: 1) current federal regulations in 40 CFR Part 257 governing the disposal of solid waste, 2) state regulations governing solid waste disposal; and 3) state regulations governing municipal waste combustion ash disposal or utilization/reuse, where they exist. See also Environmental Defense Fund. Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies. Inc.. Docket No. 90-7437 (2d Cir. April 24,1991). Source: Andrew Teplitzky, OSW (202) 382-4536 Research: Cynthia Hess ------- 3. Underground Storage Tank Flow-Through Process Tank Exclusion In a manufacturing operation, a coating, containing regulated substances, is applied to a metal part that is manufactured on-site. The coating of the metal part is accomplished in the following steps: After machining processes are completed, individual metal parts are clipped to the bottom of a chain which is attached at its top to an overhead conveyor system. The conveyor carries the metal part to an open-topped tank, containing a coating solution. The tank meets the definition of "underground" provided in 40 CFR 280.12 Once over the tank, the conveyor system lowers the metal part into the coating solution. The metal part remains submerged in the solution as the conveyor travels the length of the tank at the end of which time the conveyor system raises the metal part out of the tank. The metal part is then transported via the conveyor to an area were a facility employee unclips the part and places it on a drying pad. Would this tank be exempt from the UST regulations of 40 CFR Part 280, under the "flow-through process tank" exclusion of 40 CFR Part 280.12? Yes, the tank would qualify for the exclusion because it meets the three necessary conditions to be considered a "flow-through process tank": 1) forms an integral part of a production process, 2) has a steady, variable, recurring/ or intermittent flow of materials through the tank during the operation of the process, and 3) is not used for the storage of materials prior to their introduc- tion into the production process or for the storage of finished products or by- products from the production process. These conditions are met because the production process (coating) actually occurs in the tank, therefore it is integral; and does not store prior to or after production. The flow is intermittent, satisfying condition 2. Source: Tom Schruben, OUST (703) 308-8875 Research: Dan Irvin CERCLA 4. Clarification of CERCLA lll(g). Notice to Potentially Injured Parties The owner of a facility identifies a release of a hazardous substance that poses a threat to persons surrounding the facility. The owner is concerned about statutory and regulatory requirements for notification to potentially injured parties. According to section 11 Kg) of CERCLA, the President shall promulgate rules and regulations with respect to notification to be provided to potentially injured parties from a release of a hazardous substance. CERCLA section 11 Kg) states that "(u)ntil the promulgation of such rules and regulations, the owner and operator of any vessel or facility from which a hazardous substance has been released shall provide reasonable notice to potentially injured parties by publication in the local newspaper serving the affected area." Have such regulations been promulgated pursuant to CERCLA section 11 Kg), or does the statute contain the only provision for such notice? ------- 4. Clarification of CERCLA 11 Kg), Notice to Potentially Injured Parties (confd) No, regulations have been promulgated pursuant to section 11 Kg) of CERCLA. Thus an owner or operator would be required to publish notice to potentially injured parties in a newspaper serving the affected area as provided by the statute. Source: Barbara Hostage, OERR-ERD (202) 382-2198 Research: Jonathan Wilk SARA TITLE III 5. Section 313: Changes in SIC Code A facility whose SIC code is outside of the manufacturing sector (20-39) believes that their current SIC code is misrepresentative of the facility's activities. In actuality, the facility may be better represented by an SIC code within the manufacturing sector. If the facility changes its SIC code to a manufacturing group should they back report for calendar years 1987,1988, and 1989 under Section 313 of EPCRA (40 CFR 372)? If the facility has not altered their operations and should have been classified as a manufacturing facility, they should report for all the previous years under Section 313 of EPCRA. If the mix of activities at the facility shifted from non- manufacturing to manufacturing (activities within SIC codes 20-39), then they should begin reporting with the year in which the mix changed to manufacturing activities. Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960 Research: Tami McNamara 6. Section 313: Reporting Obligation A facility receives a shipment of gasoline from a tank-truck. The loading dock is located within the facility boundaries. The tank-truck delivers gasoline through a hose into the tank operated by the facility. While stationed at the dock, the valve of the tank-truck ruptures and the gasoline leaks from the hose of the tank-truck. This release occurs before the shipping papers are signed off by the facility operator. Gasoline contains listed Section 313 chemicals such as benzene. If an activity threshold for benzene is met, would the facility report this release of benzene under Section 313 of Title m (40 CFR 372)? No. In the above case, the chemicals in the tank-truck are considered in transport until shipping papers are signed for at the loading dock. Section 327 of the statute states that "(e)xcept as provided in Section 304, this title does not apply to the transportation, including the storage incident to such transportation, of any substance or chemical subject to the requirements of this ------- 7. Section 313: Reporting Obligation (cont'd) title, including the transportation and distribution of natural gas." In the above scenario, the material in the tank-truck is considered to fall under the transportation exemption, and releases from this truck would be exempt from reporting under Section 313. This release however would be reportable under Section 304 of Title HI, if the quantity of any Extremely Hazardous Substances (EHS) released exceeds the RQ within a period of 24 hours. Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960 Research: Dipti Singh 8. Section 313: Employee Threshold A facility covered under Section 313 of EPCRA (40 CFR 372) has nine full-time employees and one part-time employee. The facility also has an employee who works at the facility, but does not draw a salary. Should the hours worked by the employee who does not draw a salary be counted towards the employee threshold for the facility? Yes. Even though the employee does not draw a salary he/she is still working at the facility. Any hours worked by an employee at the facility must be counted towards that facility's employee threshold. Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202) 382-3960 Research: Tami McNamara ------- II. ACTIVITIES -MAY 1991 1. The RCRA/Super fund Hotline and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Hotline responded to 18,245 questions, referrals and requests for documents in May. The breakdown is as follows: RCRA Superfund UST CEPP Ir formation Questions 6,509 1,105 542 3,736= 11,892 Call Document Requests* 2,235 288 152 1,165= 3,840 Referrals "2.000 — ***513 = 2,513 Totals 10,744 1,393 694 5,414= 18,245 * This number represents both written and verbal document requests. ** This number represents all referrals made by the RCRA/Super fund/UST section of the Hotline. *** This number represents all referrals made by the CEPP section of the Hotline. RCRA/Superfund/CEPP Hotline Activities During the month of May, the Hotline staff met with a representative from Labat- Anderson to discuss the Superfund Health Risk Support Center in Cincinnati, Ohio. The Hotline Information Specialists attended the Title III Implementation work group meeting and OUST staff meeting. The Hotline staff provided research projects: i.e., analysis of the burning of hazardous waste in Boilers and Industrial Furnace Rule. Routine administrative meetings were held with the Project Officers and Hotline program managers. ------- III. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS—May 1991 RCRA/Superfund/UST Summary of Calls by EPA Region Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Region 6 Total Questions: Total Documents Requests: RCRA/Superfund Hotline 556 1,057 1,887 1,219 1,612 1,021 Region 7 Region 8 Region 9 Region 10 International Calls 8,156 2,675 365 486 1,695 448 14 Calls Manufacturers Generators Transporters TSDFs EPAHQ EPA Regions Federal Agencies State Agencies Local Agencies Used Oil Handlers UST O/O RCRA General Information §3010 Notification §260.10 Definitions §260.22 Petitions/Delisting §261 .2 Solid Waste Definition §261.3 Haz. Waste Definition §261 C Char. Haz. Waste §261 D Listed Haz. Waste §261.4 Exclusions §261.5 Small Quantity Generators §261.6 Recycling Standards §261.7 Container Residues §262 Generator-General §262 100- 1000 kg/mo §262 Manifest Information §262 Accumulation §262 Recordkeeping & Reporting §262 International Shipments 963 842 118 350 43 146 249 405 153 89 180 560 186 142 26 216 417 635 526 290 104 163 60 233 43 . 94 160 28 38 Consultants Attorneys Laboratories Univ ./Researchers Trade Associatons Insurance Co.'s Environmental Groups Press Citizens Other TOTAL §263 Transporters §266 C Use Constituting Disposal §266 D HW Burned for Energy Rec. §266 E Used Oil Burned for Energy Recovery §266 F Precious Metal Reclamation §266 G Spent Lead— Acid Battery Reclamatior Subtitle D: Municipal Solid Waste Subtitle D: Other Asbestos/PCBs/Radon Corrective Action Dioxins Household Hazardous Waste Medical/Infectious Waste Liability/Enforcement Minimum Technology Mixed Radioactive Waste Used Oil Waste Minimization 2,804 1,131 249 292 105 101 89 126 1,492 433 10,360 65 23 97 19 31 144 93 41 55 123 33 78 71 21 11 49 115 13 ------- RCRA-TSDF/264 and 265 A Scope/Applicability 8 General Facility Standards C Preparedness/Prevention D Contingency Plans E Manifest/Recordkeeping/Rptg. F Groundwater Monitoring G Closure/Post Closure H Financial Requirements 1 Containers J Tank*? K Surface Impoundments I Waste Piles M Land Treatment N Landfills Liquids in Landfills O Incinerators P Thermal Treatment Q Chem., Phys., Biol Treatment R Underground Injection 130 43 17 14 28 52 71 29 44 89 36 9 9 20 0 39 4 5 0 X Miscellaneous §268 General §268 Solvent & Oioxins §268 California List Wastes §268 Schedled Thirds §269 Air Emissions Standards §270 A General §270 B Permit Application §270 D Changes to Permits §270 F Special Permits §270 G Interim Status/LOIS §271 State Programs §1 24 Administrative Procedures DOT Requirements OSHA Requirements/HW Training Test Methods/HW Technologies RCRA Questions RCRA Document Requests 11 205 22 29 158 0 59 42 24 11 15 36 2 38 13 202 6,509 2,235 Underground Storage Tanks General §280.10 Applicability §280.11 Interm Prohibition §280.12 Definitions - General UST Regulated Substance §280 B New UST Systems - General §280.20 Performance Stds. §280.21 Upgrading §280.22 Notification §280 C General Operating Req. §280 0 Release Detection §280 E Release Rpt. & Investigation 56 44 2 46 7 9 6 9 10 22 12 44 20 §280 F Corrective Action Petroleum §280 G Corrective Action Hazardous Substances §280 H Out-of-Service/Ctosure §280 I Financial Responsibility §281 State UST Programs Liability Enforcement LUST Trust Fund Other Provisions UST Questions UST Document Requests 24 11 0 54 89 38 14 8 12 5 542 152 8 ------- CERCLA Access & Information Gathering Administrative Record Allocations from Fund ARARs CERCLIS Citizen Suits Clean-Up Costs Clean-Up Standards Community Relations Contract Lab Program (CLP) Contractor Indemnification Contracts Definitions Emergency Response Enforcement Exposure Assess./Risk Assess. Federal Facilities Fund Balancing General Grants Hazardous Substances Health/Toxics MRS Liability Mandatory Schedules Natural Resource Damages NBARs 87 0 4 38 103 2 11 13 17 9 3 2 19 2 19 12 7 3 32 0 44 2 35 66 0 1 0 NCP Notification NPL Off-Site Policy On-Srte Policy OSHA PA/SI PRPs Public Participation Radon RCRA Interface RD/RA Remedial Removal Response RI/FS ROD RQ SARA Interface Settlements SITE Program State Participation State Program Taxes Title lll/Right-to-Know CERCLA Questions CERCLA Document Requests Referrals Referrals - EPA HO Other Hotlines Regions State GPO/NTIS/PIC ORD/Dockets Other SUBTOTAL 55 57 127 7 3 5 9 20 5 0 9 2 24 15 4 29 23 109 6 15 11 3 0 2 34 1,105 288 95 493 172 346 520 122 252 2000 ------- CEPP Total Questions: Total Document Requests: Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Information Hotline • May 1991 Distribution of Calls by EPA Regions Region 1 Region 2 Reg ion 3 Region 4 Region 5 International 350 435 535 622 840 1 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 Region 9 Region 10 Unknown 3,736 1,165 336 178 83 433 109 135 Calls Manufactuers: Food Tobacco Textiles Apparel Lumber & Wood Furniture Paper Printing & Publishing Chemicals Petroleum & Coal Rubber and Plastics Leather Stone, Clay & Glass Primary Metals Fabricated Metals Machinery (Excluding Electrical) Electrical& Electronic Equipment Transportation Equipment Instruments Misc. Manufacturing Not Able to Determine [SUBTOTAL |Trtle III General (7.15%) §301-3 Emergency Planning: General SERCs/LEPC Notification Mixtures Extremely Hazardous Substances Delisting EHS Exemptions I SUBTOTAL 149 4 48 6 35 29 46 90 542 69 105 7 61 97 277 74 235 149 14 90 146 2,127 267 56 15 10 5 32 6 2 126 All Others: Distributors Attorneys Consultants/Engineers Laboratories Trade Associations Public Interest Groups Universities/ Academia Insurance Companies Hospitals State Agencies/SERC Fire Departments EPA Local Officials LEPC Farmers Federal Agencies Media/Press Union/Labor Citizens Indians Other SUBTOTAL (Mfg & All Others) §311/312: General MSDS Reporting Requirements Tier I/I I Regulations Thresholds OSHA Expansion Hazard Categories Mixtures Exemptions (SUBTOTAL (18.04%) 90 128 658 40 19 27 64 3 72 9 75 33 33 4 47 30 4 154 0 190 370 2,050 4,323 219 65 221 99 13 16 5 36 674| 10 ------- §313: Form R Thresholds Phase I Phase II Phase III Workshop (Training) Petitions Health Effects Database Exemptions (SUBTOTAL (64.37%) Release Notification: General Notification Requirements Reportable Quantities RQs vs. TPQs Transportation Exemptions I SUBTOTAL (3.67%) Training: General §305 Training Grants §305 Emergency Systems Review §126 (SARA) Training Regulations ISUBTOTAL (0.11%) General: CEPP Interim Guide Chemical Profile NRT-1 Hazard Analysis Risk Communication Title III Workshops Information Management Prevention ARIP Glher SUBTOTAL (2.38%) Trade Secrets (0.16%) Enforcement (0.54%) Liability (0.21%) CEPP Questions CEPP Document Requests 1,317 261 421 146 26 2 49 12 52 119 2,405| 61 31 27 12 2 4 137| 0 0 0 4 41 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 89 6 20 8 3,736 1,165 Referrals OSHA Preparedness Staff OTS Staff RCRA/Superfund Hotline Regional EPA TSCA Hotline State/SERC TRIUS 40 1 19 95 18 33 78 72 Other 157 ISUBTOTAL 513 RCRA/SUPERFUND UST/EPCRA QUESTIONS, DOCUMENTS REQUESTS AND REFERRALS GRAND TOTAL 18,245 11 ------- IV. PUBLICATIONS - MAY 1991 RCRA/SF The following document is available through the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield , VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Subject State Programs Advisory "State Program Advisory No. 8," (Policy Directive No. 9541.00-13). NTIS Order No.: PB91-179168. The following documents are available through the RCRA/SF Hotline: Subject Petroleum Refinery/Separation Sludge "Hazardous Waste Management System; ID and Listing of Hazardous Waste; CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation Petroleum Refinery Primary and Secondary Oil/Water/Solids Separation Sludge Listings (F037 and F038);" Interim Final Rule; May 13,1991. The Order No. is OSW-FR-91-019. "Environmental Fact Sheet: EPA Amends Primary Petroleum Sludge Listing," May 20,1991. The Order No. is EPA/530-SW-91-048. Subject: Mineral Processing "Environmental Fact Sheet: Agency Determines Final Regulatory Status of Special Wastes from Mineral Processing," May 20,1991. The Order No. is EPA/530-SW-91-053. "Final Regulatory Determination for Special Wastes from Mineral Processing," May 20,1991. The Order No. is OSW-FR-91-018. 12 ------- V. RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - MAY 1991 Former Notices With Open Comment Periods October 17,1990 (55 FR 42067) (Notice) March 8,1991 (55 FR 9948) (Notice of Grant Availability) March 21,1991 (56 FR 12094) (Notice of Grant Availability) March 27,1991 (56 FR 12826) (Reportable Quantity Adjustments) This notice contains the fourth list of hazardous substances that will be the subject of the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Regulatory (ATSDR) toxicological profiles. The length of the comment period is unspecified. EPA issued a notice of availability of $800,000.00 in funds from the Office of Toxic Substances (OTS) to be used to improve TRI data management. These funds will be made available to States, Indian Tribes and U.S. Territories after review of applications. A letter of intent must be submitted by April 8, 1991, and an application package by June 6, 1991. EPA issued a notice of grant availability of $1.2 million in funds from the Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office (CEPPO). These funds will be used to enhance the SARA Title HI programs of States, Indian Tribes and U.S. Territories. A letter of intent to participate is due by April 18,1991. Completed applications must be sent by June 21,1991. EPA is proposing to adjust the reportable quantities (RQs) for F037 and F038 wastes (sludges from petroleum refinery separation processes) under CERCLA. Comments must be submitted on or before May 28,1991. 13 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 2,1991 (56 FR 13411) (Immediate Final Rule) April 3, 1991 (56 FR 13595) (Immediate Final Rule) April 3,1991 (56 FR 13644) (Notice of Proposed Settlement) April 3,1991 (56 FR 13653) (Notice of Consent Decree) EPA is granting final authorization for Oklahoma's State hazardous waste management program. The effective date is June 3,1991, unless EPA rublishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. Comments on the Oklahoma program revision will be received until May 2, 1991. Illinois has applied for final authorization of revisions to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. EPA is granting final authorization to Illinois, subject to public review and comment, to operate an • expanded program, subject to authority retained by EPA under the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. Final authorization shall be effective June 3,1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. All comments must be received by May 3,1991. EPA has agreed to settle claims for response costs under section 122(h) of CERCLA at the Tartar Farms Site in Somerset, Kentucky with Cooper Industries, Inc. EPA will receive comments until May 3,1991. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is giving notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Midwest Solvent Recovery, Inc., Civil Action No. H-79-556. This action was brought against the defendant, also known as Perm Central Corporation, pursuant to CERCLA relating to an Order of EPA for the Cleanup of the Midco n CERCLA facility located at 5900 Industrial Highway in Gary, Indiana, and for the recovery of costs incurred by the United States in connection with the facility. DOJ will receive comments until May 3,1991. 14 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline Xational Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 8, 1991 (56 FR 14203) (Immediate Final Rule) April 9,1991 (56 FR 14341) (FACA Committee Meeting) April 10,1991 (56 FR 14474) (Immediate Final Rule) April 10,1991 (56 FR 14537) (Notice of Consent Decree) EPA is granting final authorization to Ohio, subject to public review and comment, for revisions to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. The effective date is June 7, 1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. Comments on the Ohio program revision will be received until May 8,1991. The Federal Advisory Committee is giving notice of a final meeting of the Committee to negotiate a rule to recycle lead acid batteries. The purpose of this meeting is to reach consensus on a regulatory option for recycling of lead acid batteries. The meeting is open to the public and will be held on May 1,1991, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Rosslyn, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia. North Carolina has applied for final authorization of revisions to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. EPA is granting final authorization to North Carolina, subject to public review and comment, to operate an expanded program, subject to authority retained by EPA under the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. Final authorization shall be effective June 9,1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. All comments must be received by May 10,1991. DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Dow Corning Corporation. The Consent Decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky to recover $58,078.37 to reimburse the Superfund for costs incurred by the United States in responding to the presence of hazardous substances at the Howe Valley Superfund Site. DOJ will receive comments through May 10,1991. 15 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free 4 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 12,1991 (56 FR 15020) (Proposed Rule) April 15,1991 (56 FR 15096) (Notice of Consent Decree) April 15,1991 (56 FR 15080) (Notice for Public Comment) EPA is proposing treatment standards under the land disposal restrictions program for wastes identified as K061 that are non waste waters and contain equal to or greater than 15% total zinc, determined at the point of generation. This action proposes these treatment standards based on the analysis of nonwastewater residues from high temperature metals recovery processes. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted on or before May 13, 1991. DOJ is giving notice that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. C. Robert Ivey, et al., was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The proposed Consent Decree concerns the hazardous waste site known as the Liquid Disposal, Incorporated (LDI), site located in Shelby Township, Macomb County, Michigan. Under the terms of the Consent Decree, the United States will obtain judgments against each of three defendants, Chemical Recovery Systems, Holly Container Corporation, and Gordan Ver Hulst, for $4.8 million and will receive payments totaling $265,000 as reimburse- ment to the United States for its response costs at the LDI Site. DOJ will receive comments on the proposed Consent Decree until May 15,1991. EPA is proposing to enter into two de minimis administrative settlements to resolve claims for recovery of costs incurred at the McKin Superfund Site in Gray, Maine, under the authority of CERCLA. Notice is being published to inform the public of the proposed settlements and of the opportunity to comment. EPA will receive written comments relating to the settlements until May 15,1991. 16 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toil Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 16,1991 (56 FR 15347) (Meeting) April 17,1991 (56 FR 15503) (Immediate Final Rule) April 18,1991 (56 FR 15932) (Notice of Consent Decree) April 22,1991 (56 FR 16276) (Notice of Tentative Determination) The Science Advisory Board's (SAB's) Explosives and Flammables Criteria Subcommittee (EFCs) of the Environmental Engineering Committee (EEC), will conduct a review of the Agency's technical issues relating to explosives ind flammables criteria. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 29, 1991. EPA is granting final authorization to South Dakota, subject to public review and comment, for revisions to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. The effective date is June 17, 1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. Comments on the South Dakota program revision will be received until May 17,1991. DOJ is giving notice that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Allworth. Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. 91- 30070/RV was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The proposed Consent Decree concerns the clean-up of the Dubose Oil Products Site in Escambia County, Florida. DOJ will receive comments until May 18,1991. EPA has received a complete application from the State of New Hampshire request- ing final approval of its underground storage tank (UST) program under Subtitle I of RCRA. EPA has reviewed the application and has made the tentative decision that New Hampshire's UST program satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final approval. New Hampshire's applica- tion is now available for public review and copying. A public hearing is scheduled for May 23,1991. Requests to present oral testimony must be filed by May 17,1991. EPA will also accept public comments until May 23,1991. 17 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free rf 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 22,1991 (56 FR 16332) (Notice) April 23,1991 (56 FR 18517) (Immediate Final Rule) In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been tor warded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR pertains to Section 123 of CERCLA, local government reimbursement for costs incurred in carrying out temporary emergency measures necessary to prevent or mitigate injury to human health or the environment associated with the release or threatened release of any hazardous substances contaminant. This information collection requires applicants for reimbursement to submit an application package demonstrat- ing the financial burden, and a consistency in the response with program eligibility criteria. Comments must be submitted on or before May 22,1991. Michigan has applied for final authorization for revisions to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. EPA is granting final authorization to Michigan, subject to public review and comment, to operate an expanded program, subject to authority retained by EPA under the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984. Final authorization shall be effective June 24, 1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. All comments must be received by May 23,1991. 18 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 29, 1991 (56 FR 19691) (Notice of Consent Decree) April 30,1991 (56 FR 19805) (Notice of Michigan's Compliance Schedule to Adopt Program Modifications) DOJ is giving notice that on April 18, 1991, a Consent Decree in United States v. Hercules Incorporated, et ah. was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. This is the second Consent Decree lodged in this action. The amended complaint filed by the United States on December 27,1990, alleges that Hercules Inc., et al., are responsible to reimburse the United States costs totaling in excess of $2.1 million incurred by the EPA between November 1,1979 and April 22, 1988 in response to the release and threatened release of hazardous substances from the Delaware Sand and Gravel Landfill Superfund Site in New Castle County, Delaware. DOJ will receive comments relating to the proposed Consent Decree until May 29, 1991, EPA promulgated on September 22, 1986, amendments to the deadlines for State program modifications and published requirements for States to be placed on a compliance schedule to adopt necessary program modifications. In this notice, EPA is publishing a compliance schedule for Michigan to modify its program in accord- ance with section 271.21 (g) to adopt Federal program modifications. Michigan expects to submit an application to the EPA requesting authorization for the necessary program revisions by February 28,1992. 19 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free * 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 April 30,1991 (56 FR 19852) (Notice) April 30,1991 (56 FR 19853) (Notice; Request for Public Comment) In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this notice announces that an Information Collection Request has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget for review and comment. The Technology Innovation Office of the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response is planning a voluntary and on-going request for information from developers and vendors of new treatment technologies that address contaminated hazardous waste sites. The survey form will collect both general company information and technology specific data. Comments must be submitted on or before May 30,1991. EPA is proposing to enter into a cost recovery settlement agreement under section 122(h)(l) of CERCLA. This proposed settlement is intended to resolve the liability of over 50 parties for response costs incurred at the Try-Chem Site in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This notice seeks to elicit public comments to the Try-Chem Site Cost Recovery Settlement Agreement pursuant to section 122(i) of CERCLA. Comments must be received on or before May 30,1991. 20 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 MAY FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES May 1,1991 (56 FR 19951) (Administrative Stay) May 2,1991 (56 FR 20223) (Notice of Meeting) May 6, 1991 (56 FR 20548) (Notice of Availability) EPA is announcing an administrative stay of a portion of the K069 hazardous waste listing. Effective May 1,1991, the listing does not apply to slurries generated from air pollution control devices that are intended to capture acid gases and are not dedicated chiefly to control of particulate air emissions. In the near future, EPA intends to propose to amend the language of the K069 listing to clarify the scope of listing. The administrative stay will remain in effect until 30 days after completion of that rulemaking. EPA's Risk Assessment Forum is sponsoring a workshop to obtain scientific peer review of an EPA report that describes general principals for ecological risk assessment. The workshop will begin May 14, 1991, and end May 16th. Pursuant to Section 6002 of RCRA, EPA has issued a series of guidelines designed to encourage the Federal Government's use of products containing materials recovered from solid waste. On June 22,1988 (40 CFR Part 250; 53 FR 23546), EPA published general guidelines for purchasing recycled paper and paper products. This notice provides specific information intended to facilitate Federal procurement of paper and paper products containing recovered materials. 21 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9310 May 7,1991 (56 FR 21082) (Notice of Nebraska Compliance Schedule to Adopt Program Modifications) May 7, 1991 (56 FR 21174) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 7,1991 (56 FR 21175) (Notice of Consent Decree) In accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 (g), EPA is publishing a compliance schedule for Nebraska to adopt the Federal program modifications into its State hazardous waste program. Nebraska received final authorization of its hazardous waste management program on February 7, 1985 (50 FR 38950; October 4,1988). EPA is currently reviewing an authorization request for the first cluster of 1984 HSWA authorities and two more clusters of non- HSWA authorities. Today's compliance schedule is for Nebraska to obtain program modifications for some provisions in the fifth non-HSWA cluster. Nebraska expects to submit a final application for authoriza- tion of these program revisions by March 1, 1992. DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et. al.. No. 89-4346. The Consent Decree, which was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, embodies an agreement by 21 potentially responsible parties at the Lone Pine Landfill site. The United States seeks to recover $4,400,000.00 for past costs incurred by EPA in connection with the first operable unit of the site. DOJ will receive comments through June 6,1991. Pursuant to Section 122 of CERCLA, DOJ has lodged a Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in the case of United States v. Asarco. et al. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Decree, the defendants agree to pay $1,273,000.00 in reimbursement of response costs incurred in connection with the Government's investigation study and remediation at Tar Creek Site. DOJ will receive comments through June 6,1991. 22 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free tt 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460) (Proposed Rule) May 10,1991 (56 FR 21601) (Immediate Final Rule) EPA proposes to add the White Chemical Corporation site in Newark, New Jersey, to the NPL. This action is taken pursuant to Section 105(a)(8)(B) of CERCLA and Section 300.425(e) of the NCP. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has issued a public health advisory due to the threat of catastrophic releases posed by the uncontrolled storage of hazardous substances at the site, reports of adverse health effects in nearby worker populations, and the evidence of continuous airborne releases from the site. The public comment period on this notice extends through May 9,1991. The Agency has reviewed Colorado's application for final authorization of its hazardous waste program under RCRA and has made the decision that the Colorado program revision satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Thus, Colorado now has primary responsibility for carrying out the RCRA program within its borders. Approval of the Colorado hazardous waste program shall become effective in 60 days unless an adverse comment is received by June 10,1991. In the event that an adverse comment is received, EPA will publish either a withdrawal of the immediate final decision, or a notice containing a response to comments which affirms or reverses the immediate final decision. 23 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington IX Metro #703/920-9810 May 10,1991 (56 FR 21603) (Notice of Final Determination) May 13,1991 (56 FR 21955) (Interim Final Rule with Request for Comments) The State of Georgia has applied for final approval of its underground storage tank program under Subtitle I of RCRA. EPA has determined, subject to public review and comment, that the Georgia Underground Storage Tank Program satisfies all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final approval. All comments on the Georgia final approval application must be received by the close of business on June 10,1991. Final authorization for the Georgia underground storage tank program shall be effective at 1:00 p.m. on July 9,1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this final rule. On November 2,1990 (55 FR 46354), EPA added two wastes to 40 CFR 261.31. Those wastes, designated as F037 and F038, are generated in the primary and secondary separation of oil/water/solids from petro- leum refinery process wastewater and oily cooling wastewaters. New information acquired by the Agency since the promulga- tion of these listings indicates that certain separation sludges included within the listing are not similar in constituent concentration or oil/grease content to other sludges generated in the separation of oil/water/solids from petroleum refinery process wastewaters and oily cooling waters. Based on the newly received information, the Agency is promulgating an interim final rule revising the definition of wastes subject to F037 and F038 listings to state that sludges from non- contact, once-through cooling waters are not included. The Agency is also amending the definition of F038 to clarify that floats generated in aggressive biological treatment units are not included in the listing description. The interim final rule is effective on May 2,1991. Comments on today's action and any additional data must be received on or before June 30,1991. 24 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 15,1991 (56 FR 22448) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 16, 1991 (56 FR 22739) (Notice of Consent Decree) DOJ is giving notice that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Barker, et a_L Civil Action No. C-1-90-345, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on April 26,1991. The proposed Consent Decree should reimburse the United States for costs incurred while performing an emergency removal action at the Liquid Waste Management Site. DOJ will receive comments through May 14,1991. DOJ is providing notice of a proposed Consent Decree in the case of United States v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Sequa Corporation, Civil Action No. MO-91CA57. The Consent Decree, lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, settles the Government's claims in the complaint against Chromalloy American Corporation, et al., pursuant to sections 104,106, and 107 of CERCLA. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Decree, the defendants agree to implement the remedy selected by EPA in its Record of Decision, and to pay the United States the sum of $695,265.00 for the United States' past costs at the site, additional costs not to exceed $61,000.00 and all future oversight costs. DOJ will receive comments through June 15,1991. 25 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro ^703/920-9810 Mayl6, 1991 (56 FR 21740) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 16, 1991 (56 FR 22715) (Notice; Request for Public Comment) May 17,1991 (56 FR 22869) (Notice of Meetings) Pursuant to section 122(d)(2)(B) of CERCLA, DOJ is giving notice that a Consent Decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in United States v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, et al. The Consent Decree provides that Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, et al., will clean up the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Superfund site as required by the EPA's Record of Decision. The parties will agree to pay 1.5 million dollars in past response costs incurred by EPA, as well as $75,333.00 to the State of Arizona and all future response and oversight costs incurred by EPA. DOJ will receive public comments through June 15,1991. EPA is issuing notice of a proposed administrative cost recovery settlement for the Delmar Drum Site in St. Louis, Missouri. The settlement resolves an EPA claim under section 107 of CERCLA for a Section 122(h)(l) agreement against Sinclair and Rush, Inc. The settlement requires the setting party to pay $219,020.39 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund. EPA will receive comments through June 15,1991. EPA is announcing four workshops sponsored by the Risk Assessment Forum to obtain scientific peer-review for approxi- mately 20 ecological risk assessment case studies. The workshops will be held in Bethesda, Maryland on May 29 and 30; m Dallas, on June 4 and 5; in Seattle on June 11 and 12; and in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, on June 18 through 20,1991. 26 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 22,1991 (56 FR 23598) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 23,1991 (56 FR 23650) (Final Rule) May 23,1991 (56 FR 23668) (Withdrawal of Proposed Rule) Pursuant to Section 122(d)(2) of CERCLA, EPA is giving notice that a proposed Partial Consent Decree in United States v. Intel Corporation and Raytheon Company was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. This Consent Decree provides for partial remediation of a groundwater contamina- tion site in Mountain View, California, and reimbursement of past and future costs incurred by the United States in connection with the site. The DOJ will receive comments through June 21,1991. This rule delists Pigment Blue 15, Pigment Green 7 and Pigment Green 36 from "copper compounds" catagory on the Section 313 toxic chemical list of EPCRA. This rule will relieve facilities from reporting the releases of these compounds that occurred in 1990 and in subsequent years. EPA is withdrawing its proposal granting two petitions to exempt barium sulfate from the reporting requirements under the catagory "barium compounds" of the list of toxic chemicals under Section 313 of EPCRA. May 23,1991 (56 FR 23703) (Notice) This document outlines EPA's policy concurring the provisions for petitions to delist individual members of the metal compound catagories reportable under Section 313 of EPCRA of 1986. This document also provides guidance regarding the appropriate support documentation that will be necessary to allow the Agency to make decisions on such petitions. 27 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9&6, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 23,1991 (56 FR 23724) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 23, 1991 (56 FR 23648) (Immediate Final Rule) May 28,1991 (56 FR 24070) (Notice of Consent Decree) DOJ is providing notice that a proposed Consent Decree has been lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in the case of United States v. Gencorp, Inc., et al.. Civil Action No. 5:89 CV1866. This action, brought pursuant to section 107 of CERCLA, would resolve claims for recovery of response costs that the United States has incurred in connection with the Fields Brook site in Ashtabula, Ohio. The proposed Consent Decree would also resolve counterclaims that settling defendants have asserted against the United States in United States v. Gencorp, Inc., (Civil Action No. 5:89CV1866, Northern District of Ohio). DOJ will receive comments through May 22,1991. The State of Utah is applying for final authorization of its hazardous waste program under RCRA. EPA has made a decision, subject to public review and comment, that Utah's program revisions satisfy all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Final authorization for Utah shall be effective July 22,1991, unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this immediate final rule. Comments must be received by the close of business June 22,1991. EPA is giving notice of a proposed administrative costs recovery settlement entered into by EPA Region DC and the Special Master appointed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to oversee the assets of the Pacific States Steel Corporation (PSSC). The proposed settlement provides that PSSC will reimburse EPA within three years for all cost incurred at, or in conjunction with, an emergency removal at the PSSC site in Union City, California. EPA will receive comments until June 27,1991. 28 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 30,1991 (56 FR 24444) EPA is requesting data and comments on (Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) possible BOAT, treatment capacity and treatment standards for certain wastes listed as hazardous since enactment of the 1984 HSWA amendments/ and for contaminated debris. In addition, the Agency is soliciting comments on several other provisions of the Land Disposal Restrictions, such as potential universal treatment standards for various categories of wastes, modification to the treatment standards for F001-F005 solvent wastes and modifications of treatment standards for lab packs. The comment period on waste minimization issues ends on July 29,1991. All other comments on this Notice must be submitted on or before July 1, 1991. May 31,1991 (56 FR 24834) (Notice of Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment) DOJ is providing notice of a proposed Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment in United States v. Burrow, et al.. Civil Action No. K88- 128-A8. The Joint Stipulation was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. This proposed action resolves the judicial enforcement action brought by the United States against Auto Specialities Manufacturing Company pursuant to CERCLA. The proposed Joint Stipulation provides for the entry of judgment in the amount of $250,000.00. The judgment shall be art allowed claim in bankruptcy pursuant to Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code. DOJ will receive comments through June 30,1991. 29 ------- RCRA/Superfund Hotline National Toll Free * 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810 May 31,1991 (56 FR 24835) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 31,1991 (56 FR 24835) (Notice of Consent Decree) May 31,1991 (56 FR 24803) (Meeting Announcement) DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent Decree In re Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Corporation. The Consent Decree was lodged with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Under the proposed settlement agreement, Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Corporation (HSTC) agrees to pay $130,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund and to sell one of its manufacturing plants and pay 55% of the net sales proceeds to Superfund. These funds are being paid to reimburse the United States for past and future response actions taken at the HSTC facility in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. DOJ will receive comments on this Consent Decree through June 30, 1991. DOJ gives notice that proposed Consent Decree in United States of America v. Termac, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 91-3042 was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The proposed Consent Decree resolves the liability of Defendants under CERCLA for the groundwater contamination at the Bally Engineered Structures Superfund Site. Defendants would be required to implement the June 30,1989 Record of Decision and to pay $95,000.00 in settlement of past responses costs. DOJ will receive comments relating to the proposed Decree through June 30,1991. EPA is announcing an open meeting of the Federal Advisory Committee on Mining Wastes. The purpose of the Committee meeting is to develop and exchange ideas about managing mining waste in order to assist EPA in carrying out its duties under RCRA. The Committee will meet on June 17 and 18 in Denver, Colorado; and on July 25 and 26 in San Francisco, California. 30 ------- LIST OF ADDRESSEES: Ed Abrams, OS-332 Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7 Kate Anderson, OS-520 Beih Behrens, EPA-NEIC Frank Biros, OS-500 KathyBishop,OS-210 John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho Susan Bromm, OS-500 Karen Brown, A-149C Nancy Browne, OS-520 Jann Buller, BAH Karen Burgan, OS-110 Edmond Burks, EPA-Reg. 5 Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2 Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1 Richard Clanzio, EPA-Reg. 5 Don R. Clay, OS-100 Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9 Steve Cochran, OS-333 Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama Hans Crump, OS-210 Becky Cuthbertson, OS-332 Gordon Davidson, OS-500 Elaine Davies, OS-100 Jeffery Demt, OS-300 Lynn DePont, OS-305 Director, RED, LE-134S Dave Eberly, OS-343 Karen Ellenberger,OS^20 Terry Estardin, CA Dept. of Health Terry Feldman, OS-120 Tim Fields, OS-2QO LisaFnedman, LE-132S John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn. Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX Al an Goodman, EPA-Pottland, OR Knsian Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8 John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2 Janet Grubbs, OS-240 Mary Greene, OS-332 Penny Hansen, OS-230 Bill Hanson, OS-220 Cheryl Hawkins, OS-200 Irene Homer, WH-595 Barbara Hostage, OS-210 Hmton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5 Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4 Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10 Barnes Johnson, OS-311 Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7 Kathy Jones, OS-210 GaryJonesi,LE-134S Ron Josephson, OS-333 Robert Kayser, OS-333 Mitch Kidwell, OS-332 Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA William Kline, OS-322W Robert Knox, OS-130 Mike Kosakowski, OS-510 Walter Kovalick, OS-110 DaveLeotta,'PM-214F Steve Levy,OS-301 Larry Longanecker, TS-779 Henry Longest, OS-100 Jim Loomis, FL ERC Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300 Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5 James Makns, OS-120 Andrea McLaughlin, OS-220W Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7 Dorothy McManus, OS-120 Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3 Ken MitcheU, TS-779 Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7 Royal Nadeau, EPA-Reg. 2 Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6 Susan O'Keefe, LE-134S Chae Pak, EPA-Reg. 10 Myra Perez, EPA-Houston Donna Perla, OS-311 Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3 Margaret Pitre, BAH Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9 Barbara Ramsey, OS-120 Carl Reeverts, WH-550E JohnRiley, OS-210 DaleRuhter, OS-341 William Sanjour, OS-330 Mike Shannon, OS-312 Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard Elaine Stanley, OS-500 Kathie Stein, LE-134S Beverly Thomas, OS-420 Jim Thompson, OS 520 Linda Thompson, LE-134S Robert Thompson, A-104 Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK Harriett Tregomng, PM-220 Betti VanEpps, OS-240 David Van Slyke, LE-134S Sarah Veale, GAO Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8 L.C. Waldo, DOE Howard Wilson, PM-273 Denise Wright, OS -332 Tish Zimmerman, OS-220 OSW Division Directors OSW Deputy Division Directors OSW Branch Chiefs Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X Hardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X Regional Counsel, Regions I-X Regional Libraries, Regions I-X ------- |