UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
530R91107
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
nWlBOMIIf NTAl PROTECTION AGENCY
MEMORANDUM EtiV1R uBRMfl, REGION V
SUBJECT: Final Monthly Report— RCRA/ Super fund Industry Assistance and
Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Information
Hotline Report for July 1991
™™, *_fe.
FROM: Barbara Roth, Project Officer
Office of Solid Waste
TO: Addressees
This Report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039.
I. SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES—TULY1991
RCRA
1. Truck Transport of Wastewater for Purposes of Section 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A)
A treatment, storage and disposal facility manages a wastewater which is a mixture
of a solid waste and trichloroethylene in de minimis quantities as defined in Section
261.3(a)(2)(iv)(A). If the facility transports the wastewater in trucks from an on-site
sump to its on-site NPDES-permitted wastewater treatment unit, does the waste still
qualify for the exemption from the definition of hazardous waste under Section
261.3(a)(2)(iv)7
Yes, the waste still qualifies for the exemption. Section 261.3(a)(2)(iv) does
not limit the means by which the wastewater may reach the wastewater
treatment unit in order to be eligible for the exemption from the definition of
a hazardous waste. The exemption requires only that that the wastewater be
treated in a wastewater treatment unit at a facility subject to regulation under
either section 402 or section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act and the wastewater
must meet the de rninimis levels established in paragraphs (A) through (E).
Source: Ron Josephson, OSW (202) 260-6715
Research: Melicent Brenner
£5) Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
2. Enforcement of Air-Emissions Standards on RCRA-Exempt Units
A closed-loop recycling unit is located at a TSDF in Pennsylvania. While 40 CFR
§261.4(a)(8) exempts materials which are reclaimed in these units from the definition
of solid waste, the State of Pennsylvania does not honor that exemption in its State
program. The material in the recycling unit, therefore, becomes hazardous waste
under Pennsylvania law.
The June 21,1990, rule on organic air emissions for equipment leaks (55 FR 25454)
provides standards for "equipment that contains or contacts hazardous wastes with
organic concentrations of at least 10 percent by weight" in units which are subject to
permitting under Part 270. Under Pennsylvania regulation, the closed loop recycling
unit is subject to TSDF permitting. Would this unit be required to comply with the
air emissions standards?
While the closed-loop unit does contain "hazardous waste" under
Pennsylvania regulation, the material inside is not considered solid waste (and
so not a hazardous waste) under the Federal program. This State provision
extends control over a unit not regulated under Federal RCRA, increasing the
size of the regulated community and thus becoming "broader in scope" than
the Federal program. Although the Federal government retains enforcement
authority in authorized States over State provisions which are more stringent
than Federal standards, it does not have jurisdiction over provisions which are
broader in scope (see OSWER Directive 9541.04(84)). Since the closed-loop unit
is only brought under State regulation by a provision which is not part of the
authorized program, Federal standards, including the air emissions rule,
would not apply.
Until such time as the State revises its program to incorporate the June 21 rule,
there is no authority for EPA to enforce the RCRA emissions standards for the
closed-loop unit. It is still possible, however, for the State to write its own
regulations governing air emissions with which the unit would have to
comply.
Source: Susan Jones, OSW (202) 260-9857
Research: Adam Sheridan
SARA TITLE III
3. Section 313: Release Reporting Requirement for Barges
Are releases from the loading and unloading of a barge reportable under Section 313
of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)?
Releases from the covered facility (i.e., barge terminal) must be reported. This
would include releases from buildings, equipment, and storage at the terminal.
The barge terminal ends where the equipment physically meets the barge.
-------
3. Section 313: Release Reporting Requirement for Barges (cont'd)
Therefore, releases from equipment (e.g., pipelines, connections, hoses) that
may extend into public water space must also be reported. Releases from the
barge itself (e.g., air displacement of volatiles) are not reportable since barges
are not covered under the definition of a facility (EPCRA Section 329(4)).
Source: Sam Sasnett, OTS-ETD (202) 260-3821
Research: Dipti Singh
4. Section 313: Supplier Notification for Pure Chemicals
Under 40 CFR 372.45, supplier notification is required for mixtures and trade name
products containing listed toxic chemicals. The notification is not required for pure
toxic chemicals. If a facility covered by the supplier notification requirements
receives a substance which is labeled as a toxic chemical but no concentration is
given, are they required to provide notification when selling or otherwise
distributing the substance?
No, if a substance is labeled as a toxic chemical and no concentration is given
.therj the chemical should be considered "pure" (minor impurities would not be
considered). Therefore, since supplier notification is not required for pure
substances, no notification would need to be provided with this substance.
Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS/ETD (202) 260-3960
Research: Richard Whittington
5. Section 313: Reporting of Ammonia
Excess body parts from the slaughtering and butchering of animals are manipulated
to separate the fats and proteins from other material present (e.g., bones). The bones
and other materials not utilized are discarded by the facility. The separated fats and
proteins are further processed to make a final product. Some of the amino acids and
other nitrogenous materials present in the animal parts may decompose to produce
ammonia. In addition, the animal parts contain, prior to processing, amounts of
metabolic ammonia. The ammonia present in the fats and proteins remains in the
final product. How does the facility consider these amounts of ammonia for
purposes of threshold and release calculations under section 313 of the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (40 CFR 372)?
The amount of ammonia produced due to decomposition of amino acids and
other nitrogenous materials must be counted towards a manufacturing
threshold for ammonia. Ammonia resulting from decomposition that is
present in the separated fat and proteins must also be counted towards a
processing threshold for ammonia since it becomes incorporated into the final
product. (Any amounts of ammonia resulting from decomposition that
remain with the material to be discarded are not counted towards a processing
threshold since they are not incorporated into the final product.)
3
-------
5. Section 313: Section 313: Reporting of Ammonia from the Rendering Process
(cont'd)
The amount of ammonia initially present as a metabolite is counted as
follows:
• The amount of metabolic ammonia present in the separated fats and
proteins is counted towards a processing threshold for ammonia, and
• The amount of metabolic ammonia present in the material that is
discarded (e.g., bones) is not considered for threshold purposes since it is
not manufactured, processed, or otherwise used. This amount of
ammonia simply passes through the facility as a waste.
If a threshold for ammonia is met by the facility, all releases and transfers off-
site of ammonia must be reported [including releases and transfers off-site
associated with the animal parts not utilized (e.g., bones)].
Source: Ken Mitchell, OTS-ETD (202)260-3960
Research: Rich Whittington
-------
ACTIVITIES -JULY 1991
1. The RCRA/Superfund Hotline and the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Hotline responded to 16,629 questions, referrals and requests for
documents in July. The breakdown is as follows:
RCRA Superfund UST CEPP
Information Questions 7,755 1,394 487 1,822= 11,458
Call Document Requests* 1,739 333 106 603 = 2,781
Referrals **2,095 — ***295 = 2390
Totals 11,589 1,727 593 2,720=16,629
* This number represents both written and verbal document requests.
** This number represents all referrals made by the RCRA/Superfund/UST
section of the Hotline.
***
This number represents all referrals made by the CEPP section of the Hotline.
RCRA/Superfund/CEPP Hotline Activities
During the month of July, the Hotline performed the following research
assignments:
• Responses to questions raised during analysis of the TC rule; and
• Analysis of the Mineral Processing regulatory determination.
-------
III. ANALYSES OF QUESTIONS—July 1991
RCRA/Superfund/UST
Summary of Calls by EPA Region
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 4
Region 5
Region 6
Calls
Manufacturers
Generators
Transporters
TSDFs
EPAHQ
EPA Regions
Federal Agencies
State Agencies
Local Agencies
Used Oil Handlers
UST O/O
RCRA
General Information
§3010 Notification
§260. 10 Definitions
§260.22 Petrtions/Delisting
§261 .2 Solid Waste Definition
§261 .3 Haz. Waste Definition
§261 C Char. Haz. Waste
§261 D Listed Haz. Waste
§261.4 Exclusions
§261 .5 Small Quantity Generators
§261 .6 Recycling Standards
§261 .7 Container Residues
§262 Generator-General
§262 100-1 000 kg/mo
§262 Manifest Information
§262 Accumulation
§262 Recordkeeping & Reporting
§262 International Shipments
Total Questions:
Total Documents Requests:
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
593
962
1,936
1,288
1,470
873
946
699
141
313
73
120
282
413
169
66
187
808
256
261
23
418
489
751
725
261
95
210
48
228
45
73
264
31
33
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
International Calls
TOTAL
Consultants
Attorneys
Laboratories
Univ./Researchers
Trade Associatons
Insurance Co.'s
Environmental Groups
Press
Citizens
Other
TOTAL
§263 Transporters
§266 C Use Constituting Disposal
§266 H BIF
§266 E Used Oil Burned for Energy Recovery
§266 F Precious Metal Reclamation
§266 G Spent Lead — Acid Battery Reclamation
Subtitle D: Municipal Solid Waste
Subtitle D: Other
Asbestos/PCBs/Radon
Corrective Action
Dioxins
Household Hazardous Waste
Medical/Infectious Waste
Liability/Enforcement
Minimum Technology
Mixed Radioactive Waste
Used Oil
Waste Minimization
9,636
2,178
382
500
1,289
377
16
9,686
2,640
1,187
205
320
67
72
. 137
71
1,128
450
9,686
53
11
236
60
14
4
81
229
36
75
19
97
65
29
10
56
69
26
-------
RCRA-TSDF/264 and 265
A Scope/Applicability
B General Facility Standards
C Preparedness/Prevention
0 Contingency Plans
E Manifest/Recordkeeping/Rptg.
F Groundwater Monitoring
G Closure/Post Closure
H Financial Requirements
1 Containers
J Tanks
K Surface Impoundments
L Waste Piles
M Land Treatment
N Landfills
Liquids in Landfills
O Incinerators
P Thermal Treatment
Q Chem., Phys., Biol Treatment
R Underground Injection
83
35
10
10
24
48
54
25
56
76
46
7
6
27
0
46
5
1
0
X Miscellaneous
§268 General
§268 Solvent & Dioxins
§268 California List Wastes
§268 Schedled Thirds
§269 Air Emissions Standards
§270 A General
§270 B Permit Application
§270 D Changes to Permits
§270 F Special Permits
§270 G Interim Status/LOIS
§271 State Programs
§124 Administrative Procedures
DOT Requirements
OSHA Requirements/HW Training
Test Methods/HW Technologies
RCRA Questions
RCRA Document Requests
11
377
4
39
232
26
46
42
32
11
15
33
1
21
12
105
7,755
1,739
Underground Storage Tanks
General
§280.10 Applicability
§280.11 Irrterm Prohibition
§280.12 Definitions - General
UST
Regulated Substance
§280 B New UST Systems - General
§280.20 Performance Stds.
§280.21 Upgrading
§280.22 Notification
§280 C General Operating Req.
§2800 Release Detection
§280 E Release Rpt. & Investigation
49
31
2
29
0
7
7
4
21
22
2
26
14
§280 F Corrective Action Petroleum
§280 G Corrective Action
Hazardous Substances
§280 H Out-of-Service/Closure
§280 I Financial Responsibility
§281 State UST Programs
Liability
Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
Other Provisions
UST Questions
UST Document Requests
31
23
0
43
111
12
30
12
7
4
487
106
-------
CERCLA
Access & Information Gathering
Administrative Record
Allocations from Fund
ARARs
CERCLIS
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Costs
Clean-Up Standards
Community Relations
Contract Lab Program (CLP)
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts
Definitions
Emergency Response
Enforcement
Exposure Assess./Risk Assess.
Federal Facilities
Fund Balancing
General
Grants
Hazardous Substances
Heahn/Toxics
MRS
Liability
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages
NBARs
117
2
2
33
109
2
10
18
12
11
3
4
25
0
20
17
8
5
43
0
123
11
27
121
0
4
1
NCP
Notification
NPL
Off-Site Policy
On-SHe Policy
OSHA
PA/SI
PRPs
Public Participation
Radon
RCRA Interface
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
Response
RI/FS
ROD
RQ
SARA Interface
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
State Program
Taxes
Title lll/Right-to-Know
CERCLA Questions
CERCLA Document Requests
Referrals
Referrals - EPA HQ
Other Hotlines
Regions
State
GPO/NTIS/PIC
ORD/Dockets
Other
SUBTOTAL
41
37
206
1
2
0
6
13
4
0
27
9
15
11
4
19
27
196
9
6
9
1
2
2
19
1,394
333
81
430
209
328
662
141
244
2,095
8
-------
Emergency Planning Community Right-
Distribution of Calls by EPA Regions
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Reaion4
Regions
International
Calls
Manufactuers:
Food
Tobacco
Textiles
Apparel
Lumber & Wood
Furniture
Paper
Printing & Publishing
Chemicals .
Petroleum & Coal
Rubber and Plastics
Leather
Stone, Clay & Glass
Primary Metals
Fabricated Metals
Machinery (Excluding Electrical)
Electrical&Electronic Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Instruments
Misc. Manufacturing
Not Able to Determine
ISUBTOTAL
little III General (11.42%)
§301-3 Emergency Planning:
General
SERCs/LEPC
Notification
Mixtures
Extremely Hazardous Substances
Delisting EHS
Exemptions
ISUBTOTAL
165
234
407
344
450
4
52
0
30
1
20
11
25
39
270
80
41
1
21
38
108
20
62
54
8
32
46
959
208
28
9
1
2
12
1
0
53|
CEPP Total Questions:
Total Document Requests:
to-Know Information Hotline -July 1991
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
Unknown
TOTAL
All Others:
Distributors
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/ Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Agencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Citizens
Indians
Other
SUBTOTAL
(Mfg & All Others)
§311/312:
General
MSDS Reporting Requirements
Tier I/I I Regulations
Thresholds
OSHA Expansion
Hazard Categories
Mixtures
Exemptions
ISUBTOTAL (16.03%)
1,822
603
196
110
68
206
63
114
2,361
31
128
439
23
10
17
43
3
12
57
23
61
48
26
1
43
35
0
230
0
172
1.402
2,361
145
41
37
34
0
6
6
23
292|
-------
§313:
FormR
Thresholds
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Workshop (Training)
Petitions
Health Effects
Database
Exemptions
[SUBTOTAL (55.65%)
§304:
General
Notification Requirements
Reportable Quantities
RQs vs. TPQs
Transportation
Exemptions
ISUBTOTAL (5.82%)
Training:
General
§305 Training Grants
J305 Emergency Systems Review
§126 (SARA) Training Regulations
ISUBTOTAL (0.00%)
General:
CEPP Interim Guide
Chemical Profile
NRT-1
Hazard Analysis
Risk Communication
Title III Workshops
Information Management
Prevention ARIP
Other
696
96
11
89
10
1
19
22
31
39
1,0141
54
18
14
15
2
3
1061
0
0
0
0
01
0
0.
0
0
1
0
0
0
124
Referrals
SUBTOTAL
Trade Secrets
Enforcement
Liability
(6.86%)
(0.05%)
(1.10%)
(0.16%)
125
1
20
3
CEPP Questions
1.822
OSHA
Preparedness Staff
OTS Staff
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Regional EPA
TSCA Hotline
State/SERC
TRIUS
30
4
4
89
21
12
36
26
Other
73
[SUBTOTAL
295
RCRA/SUPERFUND/UST/EPCRA
QUESTIONS, DOCUMENTS REQUESTS
AND REFERRALS
GRAND TOTAL
16.629
CEPP Document Requests
603
10
-------
IV. PUBLICATIONS - TULY 1991
The following documents are available through the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650.
RCRA
The following document are available through the National Technical Information
Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650.
Subject: Corrective Action
"RCRA Corrective Action Decision Documents: The Statement of Bias and
Response to Comments," OSWER Policy Directive No. #9902.6, Order No.
PB91-201 756.
SUPERFUND
"Evaluation of Additional Guidance on Issuance of Unilateral Administrative
Orders," OSWER Policy Directive No. #9833.0-2c, Order No.: PB91-201 764.
"Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at Superfund Sites," OSWER
Policy Directive No. #9834.6, Order No.: PB91-205 476.
"Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk Assessments in RI/FS's Conducted
by PRP's," OSWER Policy Directive No. #9835.15a, Order No.: PB91-205 526.
"Superfund Desk Reference for Municipalities," OSWER Policy Directive No.
#9800.3, Order No.: PB91-193 409.
"CERCLA Site Discharges to POTW's; CERCLA Site Sampling Programs Detailed
Data Reports," OSWER Policy Directive No. #9330.2-12, Order No.:
PB91-921 270.
"Transmittal of Model Concept Decree for CERCLA Section 104(e); Information
Request for Enforcement Action," OSWER Policy Directive No. #9834.14, Order
No.: PB91-193 417.
"Applicability of LDR's to RCRA and CERCLA Groundwater Treatment
Reinjection, Superfund Management Review Recommendation #26," OSWER,
Policy Directive No. #9234.1-06, Order No.: PB91-921 332.
11
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - TULY1991
Former Notices With Open Comment Periods
October 17,1990 (55 FR 42067)
(Notice)
April 30,1991 (56 FR 19805)
(Notice of Michigan's Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
May 7,1991 (56 FR 21082)
(Notice of Nebraska Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
This notice contains the fourth list of
hazardous substances that will be the subject
of the Agency for Toxic Substance and
Disease Regulatory (ATSDR) toxicological
profiles. The length of the comment period is
unspecified.
EPA promulgated on September 22,1986,
amendments to the deadlines for State
program modifications and published
requirements for States to be placed on a
compliance schedule to adopt necessary
program modifications. In this notice, EPA is
publishing a compliance schedule for
Michigan to modify its program in accord-
ance with Section 271.21 (g) to adopt Federal
program modifications. Michigan expects to
submit an application to the EPA requesting
authorization for the necessary program
revisions by February 28,1992.
In accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 (g), EPA is
publishing a compliance schedule for
Nebraska to adopt the Federal program
modifications into its State hazardous waste
program. Nebraska received final
authorization of its hazardous waste
management program on February 7,1985
(50 FR 38950; October 4,1988). EPA is
currently reviewing an authorization request
for the first cluster of 1984 HSWA authorities
and two more clusters of non-HSWA
authorities. This compliance schedule
requires Nebraska to obtain program
modifications for several provisions in the
fifth non-HSWA cluster. Nebraska expects to
submit a final application for authorization of
these program revisions by March 1,1992.
12
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
May 30,1991 (56 FR 24444) EPA is requesting data and comments on
(Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) possible BOAT, treatment capacity and
treatment standards for certain wastes listed
as hazardous since enactment of the 1984
HSWA amendments, and for contaminated
debris. In addition, the Agency is soliciting
comments on several other provisions of the
Land Disposal Restrictions, such as
potential universal treatment standards for
various categories of wastes, modification to
the treatment standards for F001-F005
solvent wastes and modifications of
treatment standards for lab packs. The
comment period on waste minimization
issues ended on July 29,1991. All other
comments on this notice must be submitted
on or before July 1,1991.
May 31,1991 (56 FR 24803)
(Meeting Announcement)
June 7,1991 (56 FR 26409)
(FACA Committee Meeting)
EPA is announcing an open meeting of the
Federal Advisory Committee on Mining
Wastes. The purpose of the Committee is to
develop and exchange ideas about
managing mining waste in order to assist
EPA in carrying out its duties under RCRA.
The Committee met on June 17 and 18 in
Denver, Colorado, and July 25 and 26 in San
Francisco, California.
The Federal Advisory Committee is giving
notice of the second meeting of the Policy
Dialogue Committee. This meeting will
provide a forum to refine and further
develop issues raised during strawman
development and comment process, and to
facilitate the exchange of new ideas. The
committee met on June 17-18th, 1991, at the
Embassy Suites Hotel, Denver, Colorado,
and on July 24-25 at the Sir Francis Drake
Hotel, San Francisco, California. Committee
meetings are open to the public without
need for advanced notice.
13
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
June 17,1991 (56 FR 27778)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
June 17,1991.(56 FR 27778)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
June 17,1991 (56 FR 27779)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Iowa Electric
Light & Power Company.. Civil Action No.
4-91-80313. The proposed Consent Decree
was lodged with the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Iowa,
Central Division, seeking injunctive relief and
reimbursement of costs incurred by the
United States in response to the release or
threat of a release of a hazardous substance
from the Fairfield Coal Gasification Plant in
Fairfield, Iowa. The Decree requires Iowa
Electric Light & Power to finance and
perform certain remedial actions, and
maintenance and monitoring activities, at the
site. DOJ will receive comment through
July 17,1991.
DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Pierce, et al.. Civil
Action No. 83-CV-1623. The proposed
Consent Decree was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Northern District
of New York. The complaint was filed
pursuant to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9601
et seq., to recover costs incurred by the EPA
at the York Oil Superfund in Moira, New
York site. DOJ will receive comments
through July 17,1991.
DOJ is giving notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. City of San lose.
California, and A.T. Raisch Paving Co.. Civil
Action No. 91-20337-JW. The Decree was
lodged with the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief to require
the defendants to abate and remedy the
imminent and substantial endangerment, and
the effects of actual or threatened releases.
The Consent Decree requires the defendant,
to implement fully the remedy as selected in
the Agency's Record of Decision and to pay
the United States $736,023.00 in reimburse-
ment for past costs. DOJ will receive com-
ments through July .17,1991.
15
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
June 19,1991 (56 FR 28088)
(Immediate Final Rule: Response to Com-
ments and Corrections)
(June 19,1991 (56 FR 28089)
(Notice of Final Determination)
June 24,1991 (56 FR 28798)
(Proposed Rule)
This notice addresses two comments that
were received in response to the April 8,
1991, Federal Register (56 FR 14203)
regarding Ohio's provisions for listing K090
and K091 as hazardous waste (Ohio
Administrative Code 3745-51-32). This
notice also includes two additional
provisions of Ohio's hazardous waste
management program and corrects the table
of authorities published in the Federal
Register for April 8,1991, notice regarding
final authorization of revisions to Ohio's
hazardous waste management program.
Final authorization for Ohio's program
revisions will be accepted through July 19,
1991.
EPA has reached a final determination that
New Hampshire's underground storage tank
program satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final approval. Final
approval for New Hampshire shall be
effective at 1:00 p.m., July 19,1991.
EPA is proposing to define the meaning of
certain statutory elements in CERCLA. In
this proposed rule, EPA is interpreting the
CERCLA section 101(20)(A) "security interest
exemption" to clarify the range of activities
that may be undertaken, by a private or
Governmental institution, without being
considered to be participating in the facility's
management. In addition, this rule proposes
to define certain statutory elements of
CERCLA that pertain to the liability of
governmental entities that involuntarily
acquire ownership or possession of
contaminated facilities. EPA is also receiving
comments on regulatory language that
would specify such other types of
acquisitions by Governmental entities that
may be considered within the meaning of the
statute. Comments on this proposed rule
must be submitted by July 24,1991.
16
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
June 26,1991 (56 FR 29183)
(Final Rule)
June 26,1991 (56 FR 29263)
(Lodging of Consent Decree)
June 26,1991 (56 FR 29264)-
(Lodging of Consent Decree)
EPA is issuing a final rule pertaining to the
"sunset" provision of 40 CFR 372.30(e), the
rule that implements Section 313 of the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-
to-Know Act. In this final rule, the range
reporting option on the Form R will continue
to be used in 1990 and subsequent years.
Also, the pollution prevention section of the
Form R will continue to be used. Finally, this
rule replaces EPA Form R and Instructions in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) with a
Notice of Availability and a listing of
reportable data elements.
DOJ is giving notice that on June 12,1991, a
proposed Consent Decree in United States v.
Beazer East. Inc.. Civil Action N. CIV-F-91-767
(LKK-JFM) was lodged with the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of
California. The proposed Consent Decree
requires the Defendant to fully implement the
remedy selected by EPA for the Koppers
Superfund site, and to reimburse the United
States for all costs incurred and to be incurred
at the site. DOJ will receive comments on the
proposed Consent Decree until July 26,1991.
Notice is provided by DOJ that a proposed
"Consent Decree in United States v.
Rasmussen, Civil Action No. 88CV4001FL,
was lodged with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
The Consent Decree settles the liability of
defendant Alfred E. Pearson regarding certain
past and future costs incurred by the United
States in connection with the Rasmussen
Dump site. DOJ will accept comments on the
proposed Consent Decree through July 26,
1991.
17
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
June 27,1991 (56 FR 29500)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
June 27,1991 (56 FR 29485)
(Notice)
DOJ is giving notice that two proposed
Consent Decree in United States v. Tessee
Roofing and Pointing Co.. Inc., Civil Action
No. 3-91-60035 were lodged with the United
States District Court for the Southern District
of Iowa. The Decree was filed under section
107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking
reimbursement of costs incurred by the
United States in response to the release or
threat of a release of hazardous substances
from the Bettendorf Site located in
Bettendorf, Iowa. DOJ will receive
comments until July 27,1991.
EPA gives notice that the algorithm used to
generate the priority list of hazardous
substances required by CERCLA, as
amended by SARA, is being re-evaluated
and revised to include more current and
comprehensive information in the ranking
process. The algorithm is used in
conjunction with a list of the hazardous
substances which are most commonly found
at facilities on the National Priorities List.
Each substance becomes the subject of a
lexicological profile prepared by the Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) with this notice. ATSDR and EPA
solicit public comment on this revised
approach for evaluating and ranking
hazardous substances. A new list of 275
substances will be published in the Federal
Register on or before October 17,1991.
Comments on this notice will be accepted
through July 28,1991.
18
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
June 28,1991 (56 FR 29589) Mississippi has applied for final authoriza-
(Immediate Final Rule) tion of a revision to its hazardous waste
program. Mississippi's revisions consist or
the Toxitity Characteristic leaching
procedure (TCLP) Rule, a component of
HSWA Cluster H EPA has reviewed the
Application and has made a decision, subject
to public review and comment, that
Mississippi's hazardous waste program
revision satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Final authorization will be effective
August 27,1991, unless EPA publishes a prior
Federal Register action withdrawing this
immediate rule. All comments must be
received by July 29,1991.
19
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
JULY FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
July 1,1991(5612129977)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
July 1,1991 (56 FR 30192)
(Technical Correction)
July 1,1991 (56 FR 30200)
(Final Rule; Technical Amendment)
EPA gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Mattiace
Industries, Inc., et al.. No. 86-1792. The
Consent Decree was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Eastern District
of New York on June 14,1991. This Consent
Decree resolves the claim under section 107
of CERCLA for recovery of clean-up costs
incurred by the EPA in response to
Hazardous Substances released at a site in
Hicksville, New York. The Consent Decree
also resolves the United States' claims for
damages and civil penalties pursuant to
sections 107(c)(3) and 106(b)(l), based on the
defendants' failure to comply with EPA
administrative orders directing them to
investigate and clean-up the spill. Under the
terms of the Consent Decree, the defendant
will pay $1,700,000.00 plus interest accrued
since December 10,1990.
EPA is correcting errors in the final rule that
appeared in the Federal Register on
December 6,1990 (55 FR 50450). In this rule,
EPA promulgated regulations under RCRA
to add three new waste codes, F032, F034,
and F035, generated from the wood
preserving industry. EPA also promulgated
standards for drip pads used to assist in the
collection of treated wood drippage. This
notice corrects errors and clarifies language
in the preamble and regulations o'f the
December 6,1990 final rule. This rule is
effective July 1,1991.
EPA is promulgating this rule to correct
certain omission errors in the financial
responsibility requirements under Subtitle C
of RCRA. These errors were made in a
rulemaking related to liability coverage that
appeared in the Federal Register on
September 1,1988 (53 FR 33938). This
correction is effective July 1,1991.
20
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 3,1991 (56 FR 30519)
(Proposed Rule and Request for Comment)
July 8,1991 (56 FR 30996)
(Notice)
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31127)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
EPA proposes analytical methods under the
Clean Water Act and RCRA to allow the use
of alternative solvents in lieu of chlorofluoro-
carbons (CFCs) in these methods. Use of
CFC-113 is mandated under certain EPA
laboratory methods designed to test for the
oil and grease contents of waste and waste
water. The Agency is proposing to change
the requirements mat CFCs be used and is
requesting comments on alternative solvents
or methods that may be used to replace
them. This proposal will amend Methods
9070 and 9071 of SW-846. In addition, the
Agency is seeking information on the use of
CFCs in other laboratory methods which are
not currently specified in EPA regulations
but are referred to in EPA guidance. EPA
will accept comments through August 2,
1991.
EPA is today publishing its Interim Model
CERCLA RD/RA Consent Decree. This
document provides model language for
drafting Consent Decrees for settlements
pursuant to section 122 of CERCLA as
amended by SARA, for the performance of
Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/
RA). EPA is publishing this document in
order to provide wide public distribution.
The Agency may revise the model based on
experience gained in drafting RD/RA
Consent Decrees.
The EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address claims
under CERCLA. The Settlement is intended
to resolve the liability of Dean Parker,
Ray O. Parker & Son, and Vermont
American Corporation and its Northeast
Tool and Vermont Tap and Die Company
Divisions for costs incurred by EPA, as of
April 9,1990, in conducting response actions
at the Parke Landfill Superfund Site in
Lyndon, Vermont. EPA will accept
comments through August 8,1991.
21
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31127)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31128)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31405)
(Proposed De Minimis Settlement)
EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address
claims under CERCLA. The Settlement:
intended to resolve the liability under
CERCLA of Handy & Harmon, Kewanee
Industries, Inc., Swank, Inc., Texas
Instruments Incorporated, CONOCO, In(
and Goditt & Boyer for costs incurred by
EPA, as of May 2,1990, in conducting
response actions at the Shpack Landfill
Superfund Site in Norton/Attleboro,
Massachusetts. EPA will accept comment
through August 8,1991.
EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address dairr
under CERCLA. The Settlement is intende
to resolve liability under CERCLA of
Tansitor Electronics, Inc., and Siemens
Communication Systems, Inc., for costs
incurred by EPA, as of March 16,1990, in
conducting response actions at the Tansitor
Electronics, Inc., Superfund Site in
Bennington, Vermont. EPA will accept
comments through Augusts, 1991.
EPA is proposing to enter into a de minimis
Administrative Settlement to resolve claims
under CERCLA section 122(g). This
Settlement is intended to resolve the
liabilities of two parties for the response costs
incurred and to be incurred at the Colorado
Avenue Subsite of the Hastings Groundwater
Contamination Site, Hastings, Nebraska.
EPA will accept comments through August 4,
1991.
22
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31421)
(Notice of Consent Decrees)
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31422)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
DOJ gives notice of the lodging of four
Consent Decrees on July 1,1991. The
Decrees were lodged pursuant to United
States v. Cannons Engineering Corporation.
et al., No. 88-1786-WF, with the United
States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts. The Decrees resolve claims
of the United States against six defendants
in the above-referenced action under
CERCLA for contamination at four
Superfund sites. The six defendants are
Beggs & Cobb, Corp., d/b/a Seal Tanning
Co., WES, Inc., d/b/a/ Maine Coastal
Services, INCO United States, Inc., Crown
Roll Leaf, Inc., Gillis & Tivey, Inc., and
Chemical Management, Inc. The four sites
are the Cannons Engineering Superfund Site
in Bridgewater, Massachusetts, the
Plymouth Superfund Site in Plymouth,
Massachusetts, the Gilson Road Superfund
Site in Nashua, New Hampshire, and the
Tinkham's Garage Superfund Site in
Londonderry, New Hampshire. Under the
proposed Decrees, the defendants will pay a
total of approximately $1,442,000.00 for past
and future response costs incurred and to be
incurred by the EPA at the sites. DOJ will
accept comments through August 9,1991.
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Union Research
Co.. Inc. et. al. No. 87-0355 B. The Consent
Decree was lodged on July 2,1991, with the
United States District Court for the District
of Maine. The Decree resolves Counts II
and III of the Complaint filed in this matter
as to the defendant, IMC Magnetics, Corp.
Under the Decree, the defendant will pay
the United States $7,500.00 to settle for
injunctive relief and penalties. DOJ will
accept comments through August 9,1991.
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
23
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 11,1991 (56 FR 31574)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
July 12,1991 (56 FR 31900)
(Notice of Intent to Delete from the National
Priorities List)
July 12,1991 (56 £131921)
(Notice of Proposed Settlement)
July 16,1991 (56 FR 32328)
(Notice of Amendment)
Decree in United States v. Lubrizol
Corporation, et aL No. 3.-91CV7381,1
the United States and Lubrizol Corpc
Allied-Signal Corporation, Rockwell
International Corporation, and E.I. D\
de Nemours & Company. The Decree
lodged on July 1,1991, with the Unite
District Court for the Northern Distric
Ohio. The Consent Decree resolves d
of the United States under CERCLA fc
expended between March 1986 and JuJ
1990, in connection with Greiner's Lag
Facility. The site is located in Sandusk
County, Ohio, near the town of Fremoi
Under the Decree, the defendants will j
$671,808.48. DOJ will accept comments
through August 10,1991.
EPA Region II announces it intent to d€
the Beach wood /Berkeley Wells site fror
National Priorities List and requests
comment. EPA and the State of New Jei
have determined that no further fund-
financed remedial actions are appropriai
this site and actions taken to date are
protective of public health, welfare, and i
environment. Region II will accept
comments through August 12,1991.
EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address clai:
under CERCLA section 122(h). The
Settlement is intended to resolve liability
under CERCLA of the Department of the
Navy for costs incurred by EPA, as of
September 18,1991, in conducting respons
actions at the Hooper Sands Superfund sit<
in South Berwick, Maine.
This notice amends the Federal authorities
listed in the table previously published in t!
Federal Register on March 29,1991 (56 FR
13080), for final authorization for revisions
Mississippi's Hazardous Waste Program. C
the effective date, Mississippi is not
authorized to carry out certain provisions oi
the Federal program. This rule was effective
May 28,1991.
24
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 17,1991 (56 FR 32688)
(Final Rule; Technical Amendments)
July 22,1991 (56 FR)
(Proposed Rule)
July 24,1991 (56 FR 33866)
(Immediate Final Rule)
EPA is publishing technical corrections to a
rule on the burning of hazardous waste in
boilers and industrial furnaces that appeared
in the Federal Register on February 21,1991
(56 FR 7134). This notice corrects typo-
graphical and editorial errors and adds
Appendix IX and Appendix X to Part 266.
The effective date of this rule is August 21,
1991.
EPA proposes regulations under RCRA that
would require emissions controls on tanks,
surface impoundments, containers and
certain miscellaneous units. In addition, it
would impose air emissions control
requirements on generators accumulating
hazardous waste in tanks and containers
pursuant to 40 CFR §262.34. This action
represents the second phase of the three-
phased regulatory program. EPA will accept
comments through September 20,1991.
EPA has reviewed the application by the
State of North Carolina for final
authorization of revisions to its Hazardous
Waste Program under RCRA, and has
determined that North Carolina's Hazardous
Waste Management Program revisions
satisfy all of the requirements necessary to
qualify for final authorization. Accordingly,
EPA intends to approve the North Carolina
Hazardous Waste Management Program,
pending public review and comment. The
program revisions consist of the provisions
of non-HSWA Cluster V and the Toxicity
Characteristic (TC) portion of HSWA
Cluster II. Final authorization will be
effective September 17,1991.
25
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 24,1991 (56 FR 33931)
(Notice and Request for Comment)
July 25,1991 (56 FR 34075)
(Notice of Consent Decree
July 25,1991 (56 FR 34075)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA proposes to amend existing language
in Subtitle C of RCRA, 40 CFR §261.11(a)(3),
on the criteria for identifying solid wastes as
hazardous. The proposed regulatory
amendment is intended to more accurately
reflect the Agency's intent and to facilitate
consistent interpretation among EPA's
Regions as well as State enforcement
organizations. EPA will accept comments
on this proposed rule through
September 17,1991.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) published its
response to comments received on the
"Identification of Priority Data Needs for
Phenol, Chloroethane, Carbon Tetrachloride
and Isophorone," which was published in
the Federal Register on March 28,1990. (55
FR11566) This notice also includes a
revised draft copy of the Priority Data
Needs document for carbon tetrachloride to
illustrate the changes and improvements in
these comments. Based on comments
received, ATSDR has revised the format of
its Priority Data Needs documents, which
provide the background support for the
Agency's determinations of priority data
needs.
EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA, and has decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Thus, pending public review and comment,
EPA is granting final authorization to
Indiana to operate its revised program,
subject to authority retained by EPA under
HSWA. Final authorization will be effective
September 23,1991.
26
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free * 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 26,1991 (56 FR 35758)
(Proposed Rule)
July 26,1991 (56 FR 34156)
(Proposed Rule)
July 29,1991 (56 FR 35831)
(Final Rule)
July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)
(Proposed Rule)
EPA has reviewed, the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA, and decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
EPA is granting a petition to modify the
listing for sulfuric acid on the list of toxic
chemicals subject to Section 313 of the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-
to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA). Specifically,
EPA is proposing to delete non-aerosol form
of sulfuric acid from the list of toxic
chemicals subject to Section 313.
EPA gives notice of a proposed
Administrative Order of Consent under
section 122(h) of CERCLA concerning the
Spiegelberg Site in Livingston County, '
Michigan. The proposed Consent Agreement
requires the transporter, Alfred E. Pearson, to
pay $60,000.00 of the past costs incurred by
EPA at the Spiegelberg Site. EPA will accept
comments through August 23,1991.
DOJ gives notice of the filing of a complaint,
United States v. Kern-pest Site. No. 90-11-2-
500 in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri, on July 11,1991.
Simultaneously, a Consent Decree was
lodged with the Court in the settlement of the
allegations of the complaint. The Decree
settles the Government's claims pursuant to
sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA. The
proposed Consent Decree provides that
defendants will pay $440,000.00 and will
consent to a CERCLA lien on the site. It also
contains a waiver of future liability based on
the defendants' ability to pay. DOJ will
accept comments through August 24,1991.
27
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 26,1991 (56 FR 35758)
(Proposed Rule)
July 29,1991(56 FR 35831)
(Proposed Rule)
July 29,1991
(Notice of Proposed Settlement)
EPA is proposing to amend its regulations
for hazardous waste listing under RCRA by
adding seven additional wastes generated
during the production, recovery, and
refining of coke by-products produced from
coal to the list under 40 CFR §261.32. EPA
is also proposing to amend Appendix VII of
40 CFR §261 to add the constituents for
which these wastes are being listed. EPA is
also proposing to amend CERCLA
regulations 40 CFR §302.4 by designating
the new wastes as hazardous substances. In
addition, the Agency is proposing a series of
exclusions to the definition of solid waste
designed to facilitate recycling of the wastes
proposed in this notice. EPA will accept
comments through September 24,1991.
EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA and decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Thus, pending public review and comment,
EPA is granting final authorization to
Indiana to operate its revised program in
lieu of the Federal program, subject to
authority retained by EPA under HSWA.
Final authorization will be effective
September 27,1991. Comments will be
accepted until 4:30 p.m. on August 28,1991.
EPA has agreed to settle claims under
CERCLA for response costs at the Lee's
Landfill Site in Louisville, Kentucky.
Claims will be settled with the Louisville
and Jefferson County Sewer District and
Jefferson County. Written comments will be
accepted until August 28,1991.
28
-------
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 30,1991 (56 FR 36010)
(Final Rule)
July 31,1991 (56 FR 36145)
(Notice of Invitation)
July 31,1991 (56 FR 36145)
(Notice of Invitation) .
EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA and decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Thus, pending public review and comment,
EPA is granting final authorization to
Indiana to operate its revised program in
lieu of the Federal program, subject to
authority retained by EPA under HSWA.
Final authorization will be effective
September 30,1991. Comments will be
accepted until 4:30 p.m. on August 14,1991.
EPA invites submissions to VISITT, a new
database for innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies for remediation.
Developers, manufacturers, and suppliers
are all eligible to be included in the
database, which will be managed by the
Technology Innovation Office (TIO).
Complete information submitted by
September 30,1991 will be included in the
first release in early 1992.
EPA is proposing to add 22 new sites to the
National Priorities List under CERCLA.
This proposed rule brings the number of
proposed NPL sites to 23, which, when
added to the current 1,188 sites, would bring
the total to 1,211. EPA will accept
comments through September 27,1991.
29
-------
LIST OF ADDRESSEES!
EdAbrams,OS-332
Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7
Kate Anderson, OS-520
Beth Behrens, EPA-NEIC
Kathy Bishop, OS-210
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Karen Brown, A-149C
Nancy Browne, OS-520
Jann Buller, BAH
Karen Burgan, OS-110
Edmond Burks, EPA-Reg. 5
Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2
Sabrina Callihan, DOE
Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1
Richard Clarizio, EPA-Reg. 5
Don R. Clay, OS-100
Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9
Steve Cochran, OS-333
Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama
Becky Cuthbertson, OS-332
Elaine Davies, OS-100
JefferyDenit,OS-300
Lynn DePoni, OS-305
Director, RED, LE-134S
Dave Eberly, OS-343
Karen Ellenberger, OS-420
Terry Escarda, CA DepL of Health
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn.
Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX
Alar Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR
Kristan Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8
John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2
Janet Grubbs, OS-240
Mary Greene, OS-332
Hinton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5
Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4
Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10
Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7
Kathy Jones, OS-210
GaryJonesi,LE-134S
Ron Josephson, OS-333
Robert Kayser, OS-333
Mitch Kidwell, OS-332
Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA
Jerry Killiane, GAO
William Kline, OS-322W
Robert Knox, OS-130
Walter Kovalick, OS-110
Dave Leotta, PM-214F
Henry Longest, OS-100
JimLoomis, FLERC
Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300
Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5
James Makris, OS-120
Andrea McLaughlin, OS-220W
Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7
Dorothy McManus, OS-120
Tami McNamara, TS-779
Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3
Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7
Royal Nadeau, EPA-Reg. 2
Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6
Susan O'Keefe,LE-134S
ChaePak, EPA-Reg. 10
Myra Perez, EPA-Houston
Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3
Margaret Pitre, BAH
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9
Carl Reeverts, WH-550E
John Riley, OS-210
DaleRuhter,OS-341
William Sanjour, OS-330
Tim Schoepke, TS-793
Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Kathie Stein, LE-134S
Beverly Thomas, OS-420
Jim Thompson, OS-520
Linda Thompson, LE-134S
Robert Thompson, A-104
Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK
Harriett Tregoning, PM-220
Beta' VanEpps, OS-240
David Van Slyke, LE-134S
Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8
Howard Wilson, PM-273
Denise Wright, OS -332
Tish Zimmerman, OS-220
OSW Division Directors
OSW Deputy Division Directors
OSW Branch Chiefs
Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
Hardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
Regional Libraries, Regions I-X
------- |