UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                OCT  I  5
                                              530R91108
MEMORANDUM
                                                              "~~ OF-MCb Ul-
                                                            .3fE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
            Final Monthly Report— RCRA/ Superfund Industry Assistance and
            Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Information
            Hotline Report for August 1991
            . 4k       •   • ^^^i   1^^^^  m^^M
               >ara Roth, Project Officer
            Office of Solid Waste

            Addressees
      This Report is prepared and submitted in support of Contract No. 68-WO-0039.

I.     SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS AND RESOLVED ISSUES—AUGUST 1991

      RCRA

   1.  Regulatory Status of Off-Specification Circuit Printing Boards

      Periodically, in a circuit board manufacturing process, individual circuit boards are
      not considered to meet manufacturing specification standards. These units are
      dismantled, and the materials are reclaimed for use in the construction of new
      circuit boards. Assuming the circuit boards would exhibit a characteristic of 40 CFR
      Subpart C, would the dismantling and recycling of the boards be subject to RCRA
      Subtitle C hazardous waste regulations?

            No, reclamation of the off-specification circuit boards would not be subject to
            the RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste regulations because the circuit boards
            are not hazardous wastes.

            By definition, for a waste to be a hazardous waste, it must be a solid waste (40
            CFR §261.3). To determine whether a material is a solid waste when
            reclaimed, it must first be determined whether the material is a spent
            material, sludge, by-product, commercial chemical product, or scrap metal.
            (See 40 CFR §261.2(c)(3).) An unused circuit board is classified in the
            chemical products category. Although the commercial in the chemical
            products category in Table 1 of 40 CFR §261.2(c)(3) is labeled "commercial
            chemical products listed in 40 CFR §261.33," as explained in a Federal Register
            notice published on April 11,1985, (50 FR 14219) the status of commercial
            chemical products not listed in 40 CFR §261 (i.e.,  those that exhibit hazardous
                                                                   Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
   1.  Regulatory Status of Off-Specification Circuit Printing Boards (cont'd)

            wastes characteristics) is "the same as those that are listed in Section 261.33."
            These materials are normally solid wastes only if thrown away, and so are not
            solid waste if reclaimed. Further, the Agency interprets commercial chemical
            products to include all types of unused commercial products that exhibit
            characteristics, whether or not they would commonly be considered chemicals
            (e.g., circuit boards, batteries, and other types of equipment).

            Once it has been determined that the circuit boards are commercial chemical
            products, 40  CFR §261.2(c)(3) indicates that they are not solid wastes when
            they are to be reclaimed. Since the circuit boards are not solid wastes, they are
            not hazardous wastes and the reclamation is not subject to the RCRA Subtitle
            C hazardous waste regulations. It should also be noted that the 40 CFR
            §261.2(f) requirement (persons who raise a claim that a material is not a solid
            waste document must meet the terms of the exemption) may be applicable.

Source:      Charlotte Mooney, OSW                     (202) 260-6926
Research:    Cynthia Hess

   2.  Enforcement of Air-Emissions Standards on RCRA-Exempt Units

      A closed-loop recycling unit is located at a Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility
      (TSDF) in Pennsylvania.  While 40 CFR §261.4(a)(8) exempts materials which are
      reclaimed in these units from the definition of solid waste, the State of Pennsylvania
      does not honor that exemption in its State program. The material in the recycling
      unit, therefore, becomes hazardous waste under Pennsylvania law.

      The June 21,1990, rule on organic air emissions for equipment leaks (55 FR 25454)
      provides standards for "equipment that contains or contacts hazardous wastes with
      organic concentrations of at least 10 percent by weight" in units which are subject to
      permitting under Part 270.  Under Pennsylvania regulation, the dosed loop recycling
      unit is subject to TSDF permitting. Would this unit be required to comply with the
      air emissions standards?

            While the closed-loop unit does contain "hazardous waste" under
            Pennsylvania regulation, the material inside is not considered solid waste
            (and, therefore, not a hazardous waste) under the Federal program. This State
            provision extends control over a unit not regulated under RCRA, increasing
            the size of the regulated community and thus becoming "broader in scope"
            than the Federal program. Although the Federal Government retains
            enforcement authority in authorized States over State provisions which are
            more stringent than  Federal standards, it does  not have jurisdiction over
            provisions which are broader in scope. (See OSWFJl/Policy Directive

-------
   2.  Enforcement of Air-Emissions Standards on RCRA-Exempt Units (cont'd)

            9541.04(84).) Since the closed-loop unit is only brought under State regulation
            by a provision which is not part of the authorized program, Federal standards,
            including the air emissions rule, would not apply.

Source:      Susan Jones, OSW                    (202) 260-9857
Research:    Adam Sheridan

SARA TITLE III

   3.  Section 313: Reporting of NPDES Number on the Form R

      When filing a Form R under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
      Act (EPCRA) Section 313, the reporting facility must identify the numbers of any
      permits they hold under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
      (NPDES) even if the permit(s) do not pertain to the toxic chemical being reported. The
      facility identification portion of the Form R, Part I, Section 3.9, has two spaces (a) and
      (b) in which the facility enters their NPDES permit numbers, if any.  If a facility has
      been assigned more than two NPDES numbers, how should it complete the Form R?

            The current version of  the Form R only allows for identification of two NPDES
            permit numbers. There is no additional space on Form R for more than two
            NPDES permit numbers to be recorded. If a facility has more than two NPDES
            permit numbers, the facility should report the two numbers that are most
            applicable to the toxic chemical reported on Form R. If the NPDES numbers
            assigned to the facility do not apply to the chemical reported on the particular
            Form R, any two current NPDES numbers may be submitted. The facility
            should attempt, however, to supply the same NPDES permit numbers.

            As an example, a facility has 5 NPDES permit numbers, two of which apply to
            toluene, and three others which apply to non-TRI chemicals. However, the
            facility must file Form  R's for toluene and chlorine. On the form for toluene, the
            facility should include the NPDES numbers that are applicable to toluene.  On
            the form for chlorine, the facility should also use the same NPDES numbers as
            were used on the toluene form (as opposed to using two of the other three
            NPDES numbers). In any event, only current NPDES numbers should be
            reported on Form R.

Source:      Ken Mitchell, OTS/ETD                    (202) 260-3960
Research:    Elizabeth Cunniff

   4.  Section 313: Supplier Notification Requirements

      A manufacturer distributes an item to its customers. Some of the customers utiii/«-  •
      item in such a way that allows them to claim the "article exemption." [40 CFR
      372.38(b)] However, some of the customers utilize the supplied item in such a w a \

-------
4.  Section 313:  Supplier Notification Requirements (cont'd)

      that negates the "article exemption." How can the manufacturer determine when to
      provide a supplier notification for the items it distributes since it is not required to
      provide such a notification for "articles" [40 CFR 372.45(d)(l)(i)]/ and may not know
      the end result of the distributed items?

            If the end result of an item a manufacturer sells or otherwise distributes is
            unknown, no notification is necessary if the manufacturer reasonably
            anticipates that normal processing or use of the item by recipients would not
            negate its article status. If, however, the manufacturer knows that a recipient
            utilizes an item in such a way that negates its article status, the manufacturer
            would be required to provide a notification to that recipient.

Source:      Ken Mitchell, OTS/ETD                     (202) 260-3960
Research:   Dipti Singh

-------
n.    AcnvrnES -AUGUST 1991

      1.  The RCRA/Superfund Hotline and the Emergency Planning and Community
         Right-to-Know Hotline responded to 16,126 questions, referrals and requests for
         documents in August The breakdown is as follows:

                                  RCRA Superfund UST   CEPP

      Information Questions          6,159     1,069   537    1,707      =  9,472
      Call Document Requests*        2,070      415   131    1,468      =  4,084
      Referrals                     **2.194    	    —   ***376      =  2,570
      Totals                       10,423     1,484   668    3,551      = 16,126

      *   This number represents both written and verbal document requests.

      **  This number represents all referrals made by the RCRA/Superfund/UST
         section of the Hotline.

      *** This number represents all referrals made by the CEPP section of the Hotline.

      RCRA/Superfund/CEPP Hotline Activities

      During the month of August, Aiming Smith (OTS-ETD) briefed the Hotline on the
      Pollution Prevention Act. The Hotline continued its research assignments with the
      Office of Solid Waste.

-------
RCRA/Superfund
Summary of Calls by EPA Region
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3 1
Region 4 1
Region 5 1
Calls
Regulated Community 6
EPA
State & Local Gov't./Native America
Federal Agencies
Citizens
Referrals
EPAHQ
EPA Regions
States
GPO/NTIS/PIC
RCRA
General/Misc.
Special Wastes
Ash
Bevill
Medical
Oil and Gas
Subtitle C Wastes
hazardous Waste Identification
General 1
Toxicity Characteristic
Wood Preserving
Used Oil
Fluff
Mixed Waste
Delisting & Petitions
Hazardous Waste Recycling
Generators
Small Quantity Generators
Transporters
Hotline
427
807
,816
,200
,488

,555
127
437
262
978

75
231
370
651

919
2
29
108
4
,124
181
54
195
2
46
41
151
417
88
87
RCRA/SF Total Questions:
Total Document Requests:
Hotline - August 1991
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 10
International
TOTAL

Interest Groups
Educational Institutions
Media
Congress
Other
TOTAL

ORD/RCRA Docket
Other Hotlines
Other Federal Agencies
Other Sources
TOTAL

Treatment, Storage & Disposal
General Facility Standards
Siting
Capacity
Treatment
Burning
Storage
Disposal
Land Disposal Restrictions
Permits & Interim Status
Corrective Action
Financial Assurance
Liability/Enforcement
Test Methods
Health Effects
Pollution Prevention/Waste Min.
State Programs
Hazardous Waste Data

7,765
2,616
858
341
434
1,209
311
13
8,904

141
156
62
0
186
8,904

122
398
247
100
2,194

Facilities
459
14
2
153
255
87
42
371
150
141
34
43
102
12
61
49
27


-------
Subtitle D Wastes
Household Hazardous Waste
Subtitle D Facilities
General Facility Standards
Siting
Combustion
Industrial Wastes
Composting
Source Reduction
Grants & Financing
Procurement
General
Building Insulation
Cement & Products with Fly Ash
Paper & Paper Products
Re-refined Lubricating Oil
Retread Tires
Underground Storage Tanks
Misc.
Applicability/Definitions
Regulated Substances
Standards for New Tank Systems
Tank Standards and Upgrading
Operating Requirements

339
42
17
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0

151
43
13
23
25
20

Solid Waste Recycling
General
Aluminum
Batteries
Glass
Paper
Plastics
Tires
Used Oil
Markets
General
Aluminum
Batteries
Compost
Glass
Paper
Plastics
Tires
Used Oil
RCRA Questions
RCRA Document Requests

Release Detection
Release Reporting & Investigation
Corrective Action for USTs
Out-of-Service/Closure
Financial Responsibility
State Programs
Liability/Enforcement
LUST Trust Fund
UST Questions
UST Document Requests
220
2
10
3
8
9
4
0
6
0
6
3
0
0
4
5
26
6,159
2,070

30
16
18
39
131
11
8
9
537
131

-------
CERCLA
General/Misc.
Access & Information Gathering
Administrative Record
Allocations from Fund
ARARs
CERCUS
Citizen Suits
Clean-Up Costs
Clean-Up Standards
Community Relations
Contract Lab Program (CLP)
Contractor Indemnification
Contracts
Definitions
Emergency Response
Enforcement
Exposure Assess./Risk Assess.
Federal Facilities
Fund Balancing
Grants
Hazardous Substances
Health/Toxics
MRS
Liability
Mandatory Schedules
Natural Resource Damages

130
71
3
3
14
72
4
7
19
11
18
9
3
13
0
19
21
3
3
2
35
7
32
52
0
4

NBARs
NCP
Notification
NPL
Off Site Policy
On Site Policy
OSHA
PA/SI
PRPs
Public Participation
RCRA Interface
RD/RA
Remedial
Removal
Response
RI/FS
ROD
RQ
SARA Interface
Settlements
SITE Program
State Participation
State Program
Taxes
Title lll/Right-to-Know
CERCLA Questions
CERCLA Document Requests
2
18
44
109
5
2
5
13
17
1
11
11
39
15
12
41
27
99
3
12
12
4
1
1
10
1,069
415

-------
CEPP Total Questions:
Total Document Requests:
Emergency Planning Community Right-to-Know Information Hotline -August 1991
Distribution of Calls by EPA Regions
Region 1
Region 2
Regions
Region 4
Regions
International
Calls
Manufacturers:
Food
Tobacco
Textiles
Apparel
Lumber & Wood
Furniture
Paper
Printing & Publishing
Chemicals
Petroleum & Coal
Rubber and Plastics
Leather
Stone. Clay & Glass
Primary Metals
Fabricated Metals
Machinery (Excluding Electrical!
Electrical& Electronic Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Instruments
Misc. Manufacturing
Not Able to Determine
SUBTOTAL

Title III General (12.95%)
§301-3 Emergency Planning:
General
SERCs/LEPC
Notification
Mixtures
Extremely Hazardous Substances
Delisting^EHS
Exemptions
SUBTOTAL 6.50%

203
292
446
418
546
5

96
1
33
1
31
14
53
46
420
82
101
4
50
61
171
44
101
85
9
45
247
1,695

221
57
9
3
3
31
4
4
111

Region 6
Region 7
Regions
Region 9
Region 10
Unknown
TOTAL

All Others:
Distributors
Attorneys
Consultants/Engineers
Laboratories
Trade Associations
Public Interest Groups
Universities/ Academia
Insurance Companies
Hospitals
State Agencies/SERC
Fire Departments
EPA
Local Officials
LEPC
Farmers
Federal Agencies
Media/Press
Union/Labor
Citizens
Indians
Other
SUBTOTAL
(Mfg & All Others)
§311/312:
General
MSDS Reporting Requirements
Tier I/I I Regulations
Thresholds
OSHA Expansion
Hazard Categories
Mixtures
Exemptions
SUBTOTAL (19.21%)
1,707
1,468
285
146
71
341
67
258
3,078

51
127
419
32
18
30
41
8
13
66
23
52
51
44
1
41
26
3
209
0
128
1,383
3,078
135
33
55
28
3
20
11
43
328

-------
§313:
FormR
Thresholds
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Workshop (Training)
Petitions
Health Effects
Database
Exemptions
SUBTOTAL (45.75%)
§304:
General
Notification Requirements
Reportable Quantities
RQs vs. TPQs
Transportation
Exemptions
SUBTOTAL (8.44%)
Training:
General
§305 Training Grants
§305 Emergency Systems Review
§126 (SARA) Training Regulations
SUBTOTAL (0.12%)
General:
CEPP Interim Guide
Chemical Profile
NRT-1
Hazard Analysis
Risk Communication
Title III Workshops
Information Management
Prevention ARIP
Other
SUBTOTAL (5.10%)
Trade Secrets (0.47%)
Enforcement (1.05%)
Liability (0.41%)
CEPP Questions
CEPP Document Requests
412
58
110
74
13
9
33
3
35
34
781
73
16
40
2
1
12
144
1
0
0
1
2
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
80
87
8
18
7
1,707
1,468
Referrals:
OSHA
Preparedness Staff
OTS Staff
RCRA/Superfund Hotline
Regional EPA
TSCA Hotline
State/SERC
TRIUS
Other
SUBTOTAL
51
3
9
99
20
22
51
41
80
376

RCRA/SUPERFUND/UST/CEPP
QUESTIONS, DOCUMENT REQUESTS
AND REFERRALS
GRAND TOTAL
16,126
10

-------
IV.    PUBLICATIONS- AUGUST 1991

      RCRA

      The following documents are available through the National Technical Information
      Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 21161, (703) 487-4650

      Subject: Wood Preserving

         "Report to Senate Appropriations Committee: Regulation of Wood Preserving
         Wastes," OSW No: EPA/530-SW-91-058, NTIS Order No. PB91-220 301.

         1987 Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report, OSW No. EPA/530-SW-91-061,
         NTIS Order No. PB91-220 293.

      The following documents are available from the RCRA/Superfund Hotline (800)
      424-9346.

      Subject Biennial Report

         "1987 National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report, Executive Summary,"
         OSW No. EPA/530-SW-91-061 A.

      Subject: BIF

         "Fact Sheet: Amendment to Regulations for Burning Hazardous in Boilers and
         Industrial Furnaces," OSW No. EPA 530/SW-91-063.

      Subject: Wood Preserving

         "Report to Senate Appropriations Committee: Regulation of Wood Preserving
         Wastes Executive Summary," OSW No. EPA/530-SW-91-058A.
                                     11

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810

V.    FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES - AUGUST 1991
Former Notices With Open Comment Periods
October 17,1990 (55 FR 42067)
(Notice)
April 30,1991 (56 FR 19805)
(Notice of Michigan's Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
May 7,1991 (56 FR 21082)
(Notice of Nebraska's Compliance Schedule
to Adopt Program Modifications)
This notice contains the fourth list of
hazardous substances that will be the subject
of the Agency for Toxic Substance and
Disease Regulatory (ATSDR) toxicological
profiles. The length of the comment period is
unspecified.

EPA promulgated on September 22,1986,
amendments to the deadlines for State
program modifications and published
requirements for States to be placed on a
compliance schedule to adopt necessary
program modifications. In this notice, EPA is
publishing a compliance schedule for
Michigan to modify its program in accord-
ance with Section 271.21 (g) to adopt Federal
program modifications. Michigan expects to
submit an application to the EPA requesting
authorization for the necessary program
revisions by February 28,1992.

In accordance with 40 CFR 271.21 (g), EPA is
publishing a compliance schedule for
Nebraska to adopt the Federal program
modifications into its State hazardous waste
program. Nebraska received final
authorization of its hazardous waste
management program on February 7,1985.
(50 FR 38950; October 4,1988) EPA is
currently reviewing an authorization request
for die first duster of 1984 HSWA authorities
and two more clusters of non-HSWA
authorities. This compliance schedule
requires Nebraska to obtain program
modifications for several provisions in the
fifth non-HSWA duster. Nebraska expects to
submit a final application for authorization ot
these program revisions by March 1,1992
                                       12

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 3,1991 (56 FR 30519)
(Proposed Rule and Request for Comment)
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31127)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31127)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
 EPA proposes analytical methods under the
Clean Water Act and RCRA to allow the use
of alternative solvents in lieu of chlorofluoro-
carbons (CFCs) in these methods. Use of
CFC-113 is mandated under certain EPA
laboratory methods designed to test for the
oil and grease contents of waste and waste
water. The Agency is proposing to change
the requirements mat CFCs be used and is
requesting comments on alternative solvents
or methods that may be used to replace them.
This proposal will amend Methods 9070 and
9071 of SW-846. In addition, the Agency is
seeking information on the use of CFCs in
other laboratory methods which are not
currently specified in EPA regulations but are
referred to in EPA guidance documents. EPA
will accept comments through August 2,
1991.

EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address claims
under CERCLA.  The settlement is intended
to resolve the liability of Dean  Parker, Ray O.
Parker & Son, and Vermont American
Corporation and its Northeast Tool and
Vermont Tap and Die Company Divisions for
costs incurred by EPA, as of April 9,1990, in
conducting response actions at the Parke
Landfill Superfund Site in Lyndon, Vermont.
EPA will accept comments through
August 8,1991.

EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address
claims under CERCLA. The Settlement is
intended to resolve the liability under
CERCLA of Handy & Harmon, Kewanee
Industries, Inc., Swank, Inc., Texas
Instruments Incorporated, CONOCO, Inc .
and Goditt & Boyer for costs incurred by
EPA, as of May 2,1990, in conducting
response actions at the Shpack Landfill
Superfund Site in Norton/Attleboro,
Massachusetts. EPA will accept commen n
through August 8,1991.
                                       13

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 9,1991 (56 FR 31128)
(Proposed Administrative Settlement)
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31405)
(Proposed De Mmimis Settlement)
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31421)
(Notice of Consent Decrees)
EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address claims
under CERCLA. The Settlement is intended
to resolve liability under CERCLA of
Tansitor Electronics, Inc., and Siemens
Communication Systems, Inc., for costs
incurred by EPA, as of March 16,1990, in
conducting response actions at the Tansitor
Electronics, Inc., Superfund Site in
Bennington, Vermont. EPA will accept
comments through August 8,1991.

EPA is proposing to enter into a de minimis
Administrative Settlement to resolve claims
under CERCLA section 122(g).  This
Settlement is intended to resolve the
liabilities of two parties for the response costs
incurred and to be incurred at the Colorado
Avenue Subsite of the Hastings Groundwater
Contamination Site, Hastings, Nebraska.
EPA will accept comments through August 4,
1991.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) gives notice
of the lodging of four Consent Decrees on
July 1,1991. The Decrees were lodged
pursuant to United States v. Cannons
Engineering Corporation, et al., No. 88-1786-
WF, with the United States District Court for
the District of Massachusetts. The Decrees
resolve claims of the United States against six
defendants in the above-referenced action
under CERCLA for contamination at four
Superfund sites. The six defendants are
Beggs & Cobb, Corp., d/b/a Seal Tanning
Co.; WES, Inc., d/b/a/ Maine Coastal
Services; INCO United States, Inc.;Crown
Roll Leaf, Inc.; Gillis & Tivey, Inc.; and
Chemical Management, Inc.
                                        14

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31421)
(Notice of Consent Decrees) (Cont'd)
July 10,1991 (56 FR 31422)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
July 11,1991 (56 FR 31574)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
The four sites are: Cannons Engineering
Superfund Site in Bridgewater,
Massachusetts; Plymounth Superfund Site
in Plymouth, Massachusetts; Gilson Road
Superfund Site in Nashua, New Hampshire;
and Tinkham's Garage Superfund Site in
Londonderry, New Hampshire. Under the
proposed Decrees, the defendants will pay .
approximately $1,442,000.00 for past and
future response costs incurred and to be
incurred by the EPA at the sites. DOJ will
accept comments through August 9,1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Union Research
Co.. Inc.. et al.. No. 87-0355 B. The Consent
Decree was lodged on July 2,1991, with the
United States District Court for the District
of Maine. The Decree resolves Counts n
and m of the Complaint filed in this matter
as to the defendant IMC Magnetics, Corp.
Under the Decree, the defendant will pay
the United States $7,500.00 to settle for
injunctive relief and penalties. DOJ will
accept comments through August 9,1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Lubrizol
Corporation, et al.. No. 331CV7381,
between the United States and Lubrizol
Corporation; Allied-Signal Corporation;
Rockwell International Corporation; and E.I.
du Pont de Nemours & Company. The
Decree was lodged on July 1,1991, with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of Ohio. The Consent
Decree resolves claims of the United States
under CERCLA for costs expended between
March 1986 and July 1,1990, in connection
with Greiner's Lagoons Facility. The site is
located in Sandusky County, Ohio, near the
town of Fremont. Under the Decree, the
defendants will pay $671,808.48. DOJ will
accept comments through August 10,1991
                                       15

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
              National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 12,1991 (56 FR 31900)
(Notice of Intent to delete from the National
Priorities list)
July 12,1991 (56 FR 31921)
(Notice of Proposed Settlement)
July 17,1991 (56 FR 32688)
(Final Rule; Technical Amendments)
July 22,1991 (56 FR)
(Proposed Rule)
EPA Region n announces it intent to delete
the Beachwood/Berkeley Wells site from the
National Priorities List and requests
comment. EPA and the State of New Jersey
have determined that no further fund-
financed remedial actions are appropriate at
this site and actions taken to date are
protective of public health, welfare, and the
environment. Region n will accept
comments through August 12,1991.

EPA is proposing to enter into an
Administrative Settlement to address claims
under CERCLA section 122(h). The
Settlement is intended to resolve liability
under CERCLA of the U.S. Department of
the Navy for costs incurred by EPA, as of
September 18,1991, in conducting response
actions at the Hooper Sands Superfund Site
in South Berwick, Maine.

EPA is publishing technical corrections to a
rule on the burning of hazardous waste in
boilers and industrial furnaces that appeared
in the Federal Register on February 21,1991.
(56 FR 7134) This notice corrects typo-
graphical and editorial errors and adds
Appendices DC and X to Part 266. The
effective date of this rule is August 21,1991.

EPA proposes regulations under RCRA that
would require emissions controls on tanks,
surface impoundments, containers and
certain miscellaneous units. In addition, it
would impose air emissions control
requirements on generators accumulating
hazardous waste in tanks and containers
pursuant to 40 CFR §262.34. This action
represents the second phase of the three-
phased regulatory program. EPA will accept
comments through September 20,1991.
                                        16

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 24,1991 (56 FR 33866)
(Immediate Final Rule)
July 24,1991 (56 FR 33931)
(Notice and Request for Comment)
July 25,1991 (56 FR 34075)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA has reviewed the application by the
State of North Carolina for final
authorization of revisions to its Hazardous
Waste Program under RCRA, and has
determined that North Carolina's Hazardous
Waste Management Program revisions
satisfy all of the requirements necessary to
qualify for final authorization.  Accordingly,
EPA intends to approve the North Carolina
Hazardous Waste Management Program,
pending public review and comment. The
program revisions consist of the provisions
of Non-HSWA Cluster V and the Toxicity
Characteristic (TC) portion of HSWA
Cluster n. Final authorization will be
effective September 17,1991.

EPA proposes to amend existing language in
Subtitle C of RCRA, 40 CFR §261.11(a)(3), on
the criteria for identifying solid wastes as
hazardous. The proposed regulatory
amendment is intended to more accurately
reflect the Agency's intent and to facilitate
consistent interpretation among the EPA
Regions as well as State enforcement
organizations. EPA will accept comments on
this proposed rule through September 17,
1991.

EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA, and has decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Thus, pending public review and comment,
EPA is granting final authorization to
Indiana to operate its revised program,
subject to authority retained by EPA under
HSWA. Final authorization will be effective
September 23,1991.
                                       17

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
              National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 29,1991(565135831)
(Final Rule)
July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)
(Proposed Rule)
July 26,1991 (56 FR 35758)
(Proposed Rule)
EPA gives notice of a proposed
Administrative Order on Consent under
section 122(h) of CERCLA concerning the
Spiegelberg Site in Livingston County,
Michigan. The proposed Consent
Agreement requires the transporter, Alfred
E. Pearson, to pay $60,000.00 of past costs
incurred by EPA at the Spiegelberg Site.
EPA will accept comments through August
23,1991.

DOJ gives notice of the filing of a complaint,
United States v. Kem-pest Site. No. 90-11-2-
500 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, on July 11,1991.
Simultaneously, a Consent Decree was
lodged with the Court in settlement of the
allegations of the complaint. The Decree
settles the Government's claims pursuant to
sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA. The
proposed Consent Decree provides that
defendants will pay $440,000.00 and will
consent to a CERCLA lien on the site. It also
contains a waiver of future liability based on
the defendants' ability to pay. DOJ will
accept comments through August 24,1991.

EPA is proposing to amend its regulations
for hazardous waste listing under RCRA by
adding seven additional wastes generated
during the production, recovery, and
refining of coke by-products produced from
coal to the list under 40 CFR §261.32. EPA
is also proposing to amend Appendix VIE of
40 CFR §261 to add the constituents for
which these wastes are being listed. EPA is
also proposing to amend CERCLA
regulations 40 CFR §302.4 by designating
the new wastes as Hazardous Substances.
In addition, the Agency is proposing a series
of exclusions to the definition of solid waste
designed to facilitate recycling of the wastes
proposed in this notice. EPA will accept
comments through September 24,1991.
                                        18

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
              National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
July 29,1991 (56 FR 35831)
(Proposed Rule)
July 29,1991
(Notice of Proposed Settlement)
July 30,1991 (56 FR 36010)
(Final Rule)
July 31,1991 (56 FR 36145)
(Notice of Invitation)
EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA and decided that the
application satisfies all the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Thus, pending public review and comment,
EPA is granting final authorization to
Indiana to operate its revised Program in lieu
of the Federal Program, subject to authority
retained by EPA under HSWA. Final
authorization will be effective September 27,
1991. Comments will be accepted until
4:30 p.m. on August 28,1991.

EPA has agreed to settle claims under
CERCLA for response costs at the Lee's
Landfill Site in Louisville, Kentucky. Claims
will be settled with the Louisville and
Jefferson County Sewer District and Jefferson
County. Written comments will be accepted
until August 28,1991.

EPA has reviewed the State of Indiana's
application for final authorization of a
revision to its Hazardous Waste Program
under RCRA and decided that the applica-
tion satisfies all the requirements necessary
to qualify for final authorization. Thus,
pending public review and comment, EPA is
granting final authorization to Indiana to
operate its revised Program in lieu of the
Federal Program, subject to authority
retained by EPA under HSWA. Final
authorization will be effective September 30,
1991. Comments will be accepted until
4:30 p.m. on August 14,1991.

EPA invites submissions to VISITT, a new
database for innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies for remediation.
Developers, manufacturers, and suppliers
are all eligible to be included in the database,
which will be managed by the Technology
Innovation Office (TIO). Complete informa-
tion submitted by September 30,1991, will be
included in the first release in early 1992.
                                        19

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
              National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810

July 31,1991 (56 FR 36145)                   EPA proposes to add 22 new sites to the
(Notice of Invitation)                       National Priorities List under CERCLA.
                                          This proposed rule brings the number of
                                          proposed NPL sites to 23, which, when
                                          added to the current 1,188 sites, would bring
                                          the total to 1,211.  EPA will accept
                                          comments through September 27,1991.
                                        20

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
AUGUST FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES

August 1,1991 (56 FR 36845)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 1,1991 (56 FR 36845)
(Notice of Consent Order)
August 1,1991 (56 FR 36845)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 1,1991 (56 FR 36846)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 1,1991 (56 FR 36992)
(Proposed)
August 2,1991 (56 FR 37095)
(Notice)
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Allied Signal Inc7
et al.. Civil Action No. 91-408-LON. The
Consent Decree was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware.
DOJ will accept comments for 30 days.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Order in United States v. BASF-Inmont
Corporation et al.. Civil Action No. 91-40320.
The Consent Order was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan. Comments will be accepted for 30
days.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. BP America. Inc., et
§L, Civil Action No. 91-409. The Consent
Decree was lodged with the U.S. District
Court for the District of Delaware.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Georgia Pacific
Corp.. et al.. Civil Action No. 91-5063. The
Consent Decree was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the District of South
Dakota. Comments will be accepted for 30
days.

DOT is proposing amendments to the
Hazardous Materials Program Procedures
under 40 CFR107. These rules will amend
provisions published by DOT on February 28,
1991, (56 FR 8616) regarding the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act.

EPA announces that there will be a public
meeting with the Expert Panel on the Role of
Science at EPA. The meeting is scheduled to
take place on August 19,1991, at Loew's
L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, Washington, D.C., from
8:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
                                       21

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 2,1991 (56 FR 37101)
(Notice)
August 5,1991 (56 FR 37228)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 6,1991 (56 FR 37290)
(Final Rule)
August 6,1991 (56 FR 37291)
(Correction Notice)
August 6,1991 (56 FR 37331)
(Notice)
August 7,1991 (56 FR 37543)
(Notice)
The Center for Disease Control announces
the cooperative agreements for Childhold
Lead Poisoning and the availability of
Funds for Fiscal Year 1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Monsanto Co.,
Inc.. Civil Action No. 191-143. The Consent
Decree was lodged with the U.S. District
Court of the Southern District of Georgia.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days.

EPA has approved the State of Arizona's
revisions to its hazardous waste program
under RCRA. The effective date will be
October 7,1991, unless a prior Federal
Register notice is published withdrawing
this rule.

EPA gives notice of corrections to the final
authorization of Utah's State Hazardous
Waste Management Program. Some
pertinent Federal Register citations from
Table 1 were missing in the original final
rule. (56 FR 23648) The authorization
became effective on July 22,1991.

EPA is extending the comment period for
the proposed rule published on July 3,1991,
(56 FR 30591) establishing analytical
methods under Clean Water Act and RCRA
to allow the use of alternative solvents in
lieu of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in these
methods. Comments will be accepted until
October 1,1991.

EPA is expanding the bioremediation data
in the Alternative Treatment Technology
Information Center (ATTIC). All interested
parties may submit information, such as
case studies on technologies used for site
clean-up.
                                       22

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 12,1991 (56 FR 38111)
(Notice)
August 13,1991 (56 FR 38342)
(Final Rule)
August 14,1991 (56 FR 40323)
(Notice)
August 14,1991 (56 FR 40292)
(Proposed)
EPA announces an international conference
on environmental technologies for September
5-6,1991. It will be held at the Sheraton
Reston in Reston, Virginia, and will focus on
new markets for selling environmental
technologies in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and
Hungary, and on opportunities for
commercializing Federal environmental
research.

EPA is finalizing the technical amendment
related to overfill design standards for
Underground Storage Tanks under 40 CFR
280.20. This amendment will allow
alternative uses of equipment located closer
to the tops of tanks over 4,000 gallons if it can
be done to meet certain minimum levels of
performance.  This rulemaking has been
issued in response to a petition for
rulemaking under RCRA Section 7004 (a) by
the American Petroleum Institute, and has an
effective date of September 12,1991.

EPA announces public hearings that will be
held September 16-26,1991, relating to the
Integrated Environmental Plan for the
Mexico-United States Border Area. Copies of
testimony to be given at the hearings are due
by August 30,1991, and written comments
will be accepted until September 30,1991.

EPA is proposing to amend the financial
responsibility requirements for Underground
Storage Tanks containing petroleum by
modifying the compliance dates under 40
CFR §280.91(d). For petroleum marketing
firms owning 1-12 tanks at more than one
facility or less than 100 tanks at one facility
and non-marketers with a net worth of less
than $20 million, the compliance date will be
extended to December 31,1992. The
previous deadline was October 26,1991  ^ ^
FR 46022, October 30,1990) Comments * .. 1
be accepted until September 13,1991.
                                       23

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
              National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 15,1991 (56FR 40627)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 15,1991 (56 FR 40628)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 16,1991 (56 FR 40896)
(Notice of Extension to Comment
Period)
August 19,1991 (56 FR 41072)
(Final Rule)
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Gurley Refining
Co.. Inc.. et al. Civil Action No. J-C-87-291.
The Consent Decree was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of
Arkansas. Comments will be accepted for 30
days.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Lord Corporation.
etal.. Civil Action No. 91-177(E). The
Consent Decree was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania. Comments will be accepted for
30 days.

EPA is extending the comment period for the
proposed de minimis settlement under
CERCLA section 122 (g) on the Colorado
Avenue Subsite, Hastings Ground Water
Contamination Site. The original notice of
settlement was published in the Federal
Register. July 10,1991. Written comments
must be provided on or before September 9,
1991.

EPA is finalizing its decision to deny a
petition submitted by Acme Fill Corporation,
Martinez, California, to exclude certain solid
wastes generated at its facility from the lists
of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
§§261.31 and 261.32.  This rulemaking
finalizes the proposed denial published on
May 1,1990. (see 55 FR 18132)
                                        24

-------
                               RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 19,1991 (56 FR 41164)
(Final Rule)
August 20,1991 (56 FR 41286)
(Final Rule)
August 21,1991 (56 FR 41568)
(Notice of Consent Decrees)
August 21,1991 (56 FR 41569)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA is finalizing treatment standards under
the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR)
Program for K061 (electric arc furnace dust)
non wastewaters that contain 15% or more
total zinc at the point of initial generation.
The Agency is also finalizing a generic
exclusion from the derived from rule
(40 CFR §261.3(c)(2)(i)) for high temperature
metals recovery (HTMR) nonwastewater
slag residues from K061 processing,
provided that those residues can meet
designated concentration levels; are
disposed of in Subtitle D units; and do not
exhibit any characteristics of hazardous
waste. This rule also finalizes a conditional
exclusion for K061 HTMR splash condenser
dross residue from classification as a solid
waste. This rule is effective on August 8,
1991.

EPA is granting a final exclusion from the
lists of hazardous wastes contained in 40
CFR §§261.31 and 261.32 for certain solid
wastes generated by Geological Reclamation
Operations (GROWS), and Waste Systems,
Inc., of Morrisville, Pennsylvania.  This
action is in response to a delisting petition
submitted under 40 CFR §260.22.  The
effective date of the rule is August 20,1991.

DOJ announces three proposed Consent
Decrees in United States v. Allied
Corporation^ al.. under Civil Action
No.90-11-3-26. These Consent Decrees were
lodged with the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California on August 9,
1991. Comments will be received for 30
days.

DOJ announces a proposed Consent Decree
in United States v. The Michael Company, et
aL_ 90-70-D-S. The Consent Decree was
lodged with the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Iowa. Comments will be
accepted for 30 days.
                                       25

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 21,1991 (56 FR 41554)
(Notice of Final Decision on
Petition Modificaiton)
August 22,1991 (56 FR 41710)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 22,1991 (56 FR 41686)
(Notice and Request for Comments)
August 22,1991 (56 FR 41626)
(Immediate Final Rule)
August 23,1991 (56 FR 41846)
(Notice of Consent Agreement)
August 26,1991 (56 FR 42067)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
EPA gives notice that a modification of an
exemption to the land disposal restrictions
under the 1984 HSWA Amendments to
RCRA has been granted to E.I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co., Inc., Beaumont, Texas. This
exemption concerns the Class I injection
wells  located at Beaumont, Texas. This
action is effective as of August 14,1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Aeroquip. et al.,
Civil Action No. 91-2077-0. The Consent
Decree was  lodged with the U.S. District
Court for the District of South Carolina.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days.

EPA gives notice of a proposed settlement
to resolve a  claim under section 107 of
CERCLA against Mr. Frank Aiple, of Aiple
Towing Company in Stillwater, Minnesota.
Comments relating to this settlement will be
accepted for 30 days.

EPA has reviewed the State of Texas'
application for revisions to its hazardous
waste program.  Final authorization for
Texas will be effective on October 21,1991,
unless EPA  publishes a prior notice in the
Federal Register withdrawing this rule.
Comments will be accepted until
September 21,1991.

EPA gives notice of a proposed administra-
tive consent agreement under section 122 (h)
of CERCLA, as amended concerning the
United Scrap Lead Hazardous Waste Site at
Highway 25 A in Troy, Ohio. This
agreement is under Civil Action No.
V-W-91-C-11. Comments will be accepted
for 30 days.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. The Dow
Chemical Company. Civil Action No. 91-
CV-1042. The Consent Decree was lodged
with the U.S. District Court for the District
of Wyoming. Comments will be accepted
for 30 days.
                                       26

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 26,1991 (56 FR 42068)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 26,1991 (56 FR 41944)
(Final Rule)
August 26,1991 (56 FR 41958)
(Immediate Final Rule)
August 27,1991 (56 FR 42504)
Final Rule: Technical Amendments)
August 28,1991 (56 FR 42637)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Northwestern
States Portland Cement Company and
Holnam Inc.. Civil Action No. C91-3062.
The Consent Decree was lodged with the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Iowa. The comment period will be for a
period of 30 days.

EPA is announcing its decision to deny the
petition submitted by Bethlehem Steel
Corporation (BSC), Lackawanna, New York,
to exclude, on a one-time basis, certain solid
wastes generated at its facility from the lists
of hazardous wastes contained in 40 CFR
§261.31 and §261.32. This rule finalizes the
proposed denial for BSC's petition
published on April 7,1989, (54 FR 14101)
and is effective as of August 26,1991.

EPA is approving the State of Louisiana's
hazardous waste program revisions, and
final authorization shall be effective on
August 26,1991, unless EPA publishes a
prior Federal Register action withdrawing
this rule.  Comments must be received by
the close of business September 25,1991.

EPA is making several technical
amendments to the final rule for boilers  and
industrial furnaces burning hazardous
wastes. These revisions provide clarification
and correct unintended consequences of the
rule.  The amendments discussed become
effective on August 21,1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. FMC Civil Action
No. CY-91-3060-AAM. The Consent Decree
was lodged with the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Washington.
Comments will be accepted for 30 days.
                                       27

-------
                              RCRA/Superfund Hotline
             National Toll Free # 800/424-9346, Washington DC Metro #703/920-9810
August 28,1991 (56 FR 42572)
(Announcement)
August 29,1991 (56 FR 42756)
(Extension of Comment Period)
August 29,1991 (56 FR 42756)
(Notice of Consent Decree)
August 29,1991 (56 FR 42730)
(Policy Statement)
August 30,1991 (56 FR 42944)
(Immediate Final Rule)
EPA gives notice of the final meeting of the
Advisory Committee to negotiate a rule to
recycle lead acid batteries. The meeting is
open to the public and will take place on
September 17,1991 from 9:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. at the Hyatt Regency, Crystal City,
Arlington, Virginia.

DOJ gives notice of an extended comment
period in the proposed Consent Order in
United States v. BASF- Inmont Corporation.
etaLCivil Action No. 91-40320.  The
Consent Order was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan on July 18,1991. The comment
period will be extended until September 30,
1991.

DOJ gives notice of a proposed Consent
Decree in United States v. Nell Taylor, et al.,
Civil Action No.L-86-0310-L(A). The
Consent Decree was lodged with the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of
Kentucky. Comments will be accepted for 30
days.

EPA is announcing its policy on the civil
enforcement of the storage prohibition in
Section 3004 of RCRA at facilities which
generate "mixed wastes" regulated under
both RCRA Subtitle C Hazardous Waste
Program, and the Atomic Energy Act
(AEA). The policy explains how EPA
considers violations of Section 3004 (storage
prohibition at such facilities) fits the
Agency's civil enforcement priorities, and is
effective immediately.

EPA has reviewed New York's application
and approves their hazardous waste
program revisions.  Final authority for New
York becomes effective on October 29,1991,
unless a prior Federal Register action is
published to withdraw this rule.  Comments
will be accepted until September 30,1991.
                                       28

-------
LIST OF ADDRESSEES:
EdAbrams,OS-332
Jennifer Anderson, EPA-Reg. 7
Kate Anderson, OS-520
Beth Behrens, EPA-NEIC
Kathy Bishop, OS-210
John Bosky, EPA-Kansas City
Brett Bowhan, DOE-Idaho
Susan Bromm, OS-500
Karen Brown, A-149C
Nancy Browne, OS-520
Karen Burgan, OS-110
Edmond Burks, EPA-Reg. 5
Heather Bums, BAH
Diane Buxbaum, EPA-Reg. 2
Sabrina Callihan, DOE
Carol Carbone, EPA-Reg. 1
Sonia Chambers, EPA-Reg. 5
Richard Clarizio, EPA-Reg. 5
Don R.  Clay, OS-100
Jerry Clifford, EPA-Reg. 9
Bill Cosgrove, EPA-Reg. 4
Clinton Cox, EPA-Alabama
Becky Cuthbertson, OS-332
Elaine Davies, OS-100
JefferyDenit,OS-300
Lynn DePont, OS-305
Director, RED, LE-134S
Dave Eberly, OS-343
Chris Elias, CA DepL of Health
Terry Escarda,  CA DepL of Health
Lisa Friedman, LE-132S
John Gilbert, EPA-Cinn.
Diane Glass, Kelly AFB, TX
Alan Goodman, EPA-Portland, OR
Kristan Goschen, EPA-Reg. 8
John Gorman, EPA-Reg. 2
Janet Grubbs, OS-240
Hinton Howard, EPA-Reg. 5
Henry Hudson, EPA-Reg. 4
Susan Hutcherson, EPA-Reg. 10
Harriet L. Jones, EPA-Reg. 7
Kathy Jones, OS-210
GaryJonesi,LE-134S
Ron Josephson, OS-333
Robert Kayser, OS-333
Mitch Kidwell, OS-332
Bob Kievit, EPA- Olympia, WA
Jerry Killiane, GAO
William Kline, OS-322W
Robert Knox,OS-130
Walter Kovalick, OS-110
Dave Leotta, PM-214F
Henry Longest, OS-100
Jim Loomis, FL ERC
Sylvia Lowrance, OS-300
Tom Lueders, EPA-Reg. 5
James Makris, OS-120
Andrea McLaughlin, OS-220W
Chet McLaughlin, EPA-Reg. 7
Dorothy McManus, OS-120
Tami McNamara, TS-779
Scott McPhilamy, EPA-Reg. 3
Robert Morby, EPA-Reg. 7
Royal Nadeau, EPA-Reg. 2
Beverly Negri, EPA-Reg. 6
Susan O'Keefe,LE-134S
Chae Pak, EPA-Reg. 10
Myra Perez, EPA-Houston
Mark Phillips, EPA-Reg. 3
Margaret Pitre, BAH
Steve Provant, EPA-Boise, ID
Jim Radle, Jr., EPA-Reg. 9
Carl Reeverts, WH-550E
John Riley, OS-210
DaleRuhter,OS-341
Debbie Rutherford, OS-420WF
William Sanjour, OS-330
Tim Schoepke, TS-793
Jay Silberman, US Coast Guard
Elaine Stanley, OS-500
Kathie Stein, LE-134S
Beverly Thomas, OS-420WF
Jim Thompson, OS-520
Linda Thompson, LE-134S
Robert Thompson, A-104
Steve Torok, EPA-Juneau, AK
Harriett Tregoning, PM-220
Beta' VanEpps, OS-240
David Van Slyke, LE-134S
Barbara Wagner, EPA-Reg. 8
Howard Wilson, PM-273
Denise Wright, OS -332
Tish Zimmerman, OS-220
                                OSW Division Directors
                                OSW Deputy Division Directors
                                OSW Branch Chiefs
                                Hazardous Waste Division Directors, Regions I-X
                                Hardous Waste Management Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
                                Regional Counsel, Regions I-X
                                Regional Libraries, Regions I-X

-------