TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            ffleae remd Instructions on the reverie before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
  E.PA/500/8-88/032
             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO

                    PB88-178793/AS
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Health  Effects  Assessment for  2,4- and 2,6-Dinitro-
 toluene
             6. REPORT DATE
             «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
  AUTMOR(S)
                                                           a. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of Research  and Development
 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
 Cincinnati. OH   45268	
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                EPA/600/22
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
   This report  summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to a preliminary interim
 assessment of  adverse health effects associated with specific chemicals  or compounds.
 The Office of  Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses these  documents  in
 preparing cost-benefit analyses under Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under
 CERCLA.  All estimates of acceptable intakes  and carcinogenic potency presented in
 this document  should be considered as preliminary and reflect limited resources
 allocated to this  project.  The intent  in  these assessments is to suggest  acceptable
 exposure levels  whenever sufficient data are  available.  The interim  values  presented
 reflect the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure or risk to  the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible,  two categories of values have been
 estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not the  endpoint of
 concern).  The first, RfD5 or subchronic reference dose, is an estimate  of an exposure
 level that would not be expected to cause  adverse effects when exposure  occurs  during
 a limited time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level  that would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects when  exposure occurs for a significant  portion
 of the lifespan.   For compounds for which  there is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity,  qi*s have been computed,  if  appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation data  if available.
 7.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTlFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report!

  Unclas5 i fi ed
                                                                         21. NO. OF PAGES
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page/
                                                Unclassified
                           22. PRICE
EPA F«n* 2220.1 (R«». 4.77)   PMKVIOUS EDITION is OMOLETK

-------
                                              EPA/600/8-88/032
                                              May,  1987
          HEALTH EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
       FOR 2,4- AND  2,6-OINITROTOLUENE
ENVIRONMENTAL  CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND  ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE  OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             CINCINNATI, OH 45268
 U.S. Environmental Protection Awncy
 Region 5, Library (PL-12'J)
 77 West Jackson Boulevarjd, 12th Floor
 Chicago, IL  60604-3590

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


    This   document   has   been  reviewed   1n   accordance   with   the   U.S.
Environmental  Protection  Agency's  peer and  administrative  review policies
and approved for publication.  Mention  of  trade  names  or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or  recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                   PREFACE
    This report  summarizes  and  evaluates  Information relevant  to  a  prelimi-
nary  Interim  assessment  of adverse  health  effects associated  with  2,4- and
2,6-d1n1trotoluene.   All  estimates  of  acceptable  Intakes and  carcinogenic
potency presented  1n  this  document  should  be  considered as  preliminary and
reflect limited  resources  allocated  to this project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc
and environmental  data  were located  through  on-line literature  searches  of
the TOXLINE,  CANCERLIME  and  the  CHEMFATE/OATALOG  data  bases.   The  basic
literature searched  supporting  this  document  1s current  up  to  June,  1986.
Secondary sources  of  Information have  also  been relied  upon  1n the  prepara-
tion of this report and represent  large-scale  health  assessment efforts  that
entail extensive peer and Agency review.  The  following  Office  of Health and
Environmental  Assessment  (OHEA)  sources  have been extensively  utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.    1980a.   Ambient  Water  Quality Criteria  Document  for
    D1n1trotoluene. .Prepared by the Office of  Health and  Environmental
    Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincin-
    nati,  OH  for  the Office of Water  Regulations  and  Standards,  Wash-
    ington,  DC.   EPA 440/5-80-045.  NTIS PB81-117566.

    U.S.  EPA.   1983a.    Reportable  Quantity   Document  for  Benzene,
    l-Methyl-2,4-D1n1tro  (2,4-D1n1trotoluene).   Prepared by  the  Office
    of Health and  Environmental  Assessment, Environmental  Criteria  and
    Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH  for  the Office of  Emergency  and
    Remedial  Response, Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1983b.    Reportable  Quantity   Document  for  Benzene,
    l-Methyl-2,6-D1n1tro  (2,6-01n1trotoluene).   Prepared by  the  Office
    of Health and  Environmental  Assessment, Environmental  Criteria  and
    Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH  for  the Office of  Emergency  and
    Remedial  Response, Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.    1986a.   Health  and  -Environmental   Effects  Profile  for
    D1n1trotoluene.  Prepared by the Office of  Health and  Environmental
    Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincin-
    nati,  OH  for  the Office  of   Solid Waste  and  Emergency  Response,
    Washington,  DC.

    The Intent 1n  these assessments  1s  to suggest  acceptable  exposure levels
whenever sufficient data were  available.   Values were not  derived or larger
uncetDainty  factors  were  employed when  the   variable  data  was   limited  1n
scope, which  tended to generate  conservative  (I.e.,  protective)  estimates.
Nevertheless,  the  Interim  values  presented reflect  the relative degree  of
hazard associated with exposure or  risk  to the chemlcal(s)  addressed.

    Whenever   possible,  two  categories   of  values  have  been  estimated  for
systemic  toxicants  (toxicants  for  which  cancer   1s  not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).   The  first,  RfD$ (formerly AIS)  or  subchronlc reference  dose,  1s
an estimate of an  exposure  level that would  not be expected to cause adverse
effects when  exposure occurs during a  limited  time Interval  (I.e.,  for  an
Interval that does not  constitute a  significant portion of  the  Hfespan).
                                      111

-------
This type of  exposure  estimate has not been  extensively  used,  or  rigorously
defined,  as  previous  risk  assessment efforts  have been  primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants   1n  ambient  air  or  water  where  lifetime
exposure  1s  assumed.   Animal  data  used   for   RFO$  estimates   generally
Include  exposures  with durations of  30-90  days.   Subchronlc  human  data  are
rarely available.  Reported  exposures are usually  from chronic  occupational
exposure  situations  or  from  reports  of acute  accidental exposure.   These
values   are   developed  for   both   Inhalation   (RfD$j)   and   oral   (RfD$rj)
exposures.

    The  RfO   (formerly  AIC)  1s  similar  In  concept   and  addresses  chronic
exposure.  It 1s an  estimate  of  an  exposure  level  that would  not be expected
to cause  adverse  effects when exposure  occurs  for a  significant  portion of
the llfespan  [see  U.S. EPA  (1980b)  for  a discussion  of  this  concept].   The
RfD  Is  route-specific  and  estimates acceptable  exposure for  either  oral
(RfDg)  or  Inhalation   (RfDj)  with  the   Implicit   assumption  that  exposure
by other routes  1s Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncarclnogens  have  also  been  calculated
where  data  permitted.   These  values  are used  for  ranking reportable  quan-
tities and  the  methodology  for  their development  1s  explained In  U.S.  EPA
(1983).

    For  compounds  for  which there 1s  sufficient evidence  of  cardnogenldty
RfD$ and  RfD values are  not derived.  For  a discussion  of  risk  assessment
methodology  for  carcinogens refer  to U.S.  EPA  (1980b).   Since cancer  1s  a
process  that  1s  not  characterized  by  a  threshold, any  exposure contributes
an Increment  of  risk.   For  carcinogens,  q-|*s have been  computed,  1f  appro-
priate, based on oral and Inhalation data 1f available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place the  risk assessment  evaluation  In  proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this  series  as  well   as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of  the quantitative estimates presented.

    2,4-01n1trotoluene has been  demonstrated  to be carcinogenic  In  rats  and
mice when  fed  1n  the  diet   (Ellis  et  al., 1979;  Lee et  al.,  1978) as  has
technical  grade dlnltrotoluene  (CUT,  1982),  composed  of  -76%  2,4-,  -19%
2,6- and  smaller   amounts  of  other  Isomers   of   dlnltrotoluene.,   U.S.  EPA
(1980a,  1986a)  derived  several  q-|*s  based on  the  occurrence  of  liver  or
liver  and  mammary  tumors  In rats and mice from these studies.   A human  q-|*
of  0.683  (mg/kg/day)-1 based  on  the Incidence of liver and mammary  tumors
in  female  rats  (Ellis et  al., 1979; U.S. EPA,  1986a)  was  selected as  the
most  stringent  estimate  of  the  cardnogenlcHy  of 2,4-d1n1trotoluene  to
humans.

    Data were presented suggesting  that  the 2,6-lsomer may  be  more a  potent
oral carcinogen than the 2,4-lsomer.  The  data  were sufficient  for weight of
evidence classification but  Inadequate for quantitative risk  analysis.

    Data were not  located  regarding the Inhalation toxlclty of  the dlnltro-
toluenes.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for  EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Or.  Christopher  OeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn  were  the  Technical   Project  Monitors  and  John  Helms  (Office  of
Toxic  Substances)  was  the Project  Officer.   The final  documents   In  this
series  were prepared  for  the  Office  of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,
Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the following U.S. EPA  offices  provided  review comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of A1r Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH

Technical  support   services  for  the  document   series  was  provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Jacky Bohanon and Kim Davidson
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH
                                      vl

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.
2.


3.










4.






5.
6.





7.

ENVIRONHENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	 	 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2. INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
3.4. TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
4.4. WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfDs) 	
6.2. REFERENCE DOSE (RfD) 	
6.3. CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q-|*) 	
6.3.1. Oral 	
6.3.2. Inhalation 	
REFERENCES 	
APPENDIX 	
Paqe
... 1
... 4
... 4
... 4
. . . 5
... 5
. . . 5
6
6
. . . 6
... 8
8
. . . 8
. . . 9
9
10
. . . 10
10
. . . 10
. . . 12
. . . 12
. . . 13
15
16
. . . 16
. . . 16
, , , 16
. . . 16
23
... 24
. . . 32
       vll

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

No.                               Title                                Page

1-1     Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and Half-lives
        for 2,4- and 2,6-01n1trotoluene	     2
6-1     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|*  1n Female
        Sprague-Oawley Rats	    17

6-2     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|*  1n Female
        CD Rats	    18

6-3     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|*  In Male
        Swiss Mice	    20

6-4     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|*  1n Male
        F344 Rats	    21

6-5     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of qi*  1n Female
        F344 Rats	    22

-------
                             LIST  OF  ABBREVIATIONS
bw                      Body weight
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CS                      Composite score
DMA                     Oeoxyr1bonucle1c acid
FSH                     Follicle stimulating hormone
GGT+                    y-Glutamyl transpeptldase positive
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient standardized with
                        respect to soil organic matter
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
PEL                     Permissible exposure level
ppm                     Parts per million
q-j*                     Cancer potency slope
RfO                     Reference dose
RfD$                    Subchronlc reference dose
STEL                    Short-term exposed level
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
                                       1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    Selected physical  and  chemical  properties  of 2,4-d1n1trotoluene (CAS No.
121-14-2) and  2,6-dlnltrotoluene (CAS  No.  606-20-2) are presented  In Table
1-1.   Synonyms  for  dlnltrotoluene  are  methyldlnltrobenzene,  dlnltrophenyl-
methane  and  ONT.   Synonyms for  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  are l-methyl-2,4-d1n1tro-
benzene,  o,p-d1n1trotoluene and  2,4-ONT.   Synonyms  for  2,6-dlnltrotoluene
are 2-methyl-l,3-d1n1trobenzene and 2,6-DNT.
    The  atmospheric  half-lives  listed  for  2,4- and  2,6-d1n1trotoluene  are
based  on  the  estimated  rate  constant of   SxlO"11  cm3  molecule'1  sec"1
for   the  reaction  of  the   dlnltrotoluene   Isomers   with  photochemlcally
generated  OH  radical   (OH  radical   concentration   of  8xl05  molecules/cm3)
(U.S.  EPA,  1986b).  The half-life  of 2,4-d1n1trotoluene 1n water  was based
on an  Investigation  of  the contaminants  In  the Rhine River  (Zoeteman et a!.,
1980)  and laboratory  studies   using  Waconda  Bay Water  (Spanggord  et  al.,
1980).   2,6-Dlnltrotoluene is  expected  to  have  a half-life similar  to that
of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene.  Photochemical   degradation  should   be  an  Important
removal  mechanism, considering estimated photolysis  half-lives  range from 12
minutes  for  2,6-d1n1trotoluene In  river water to 2.7,  3.7  and  9.6 hours  for
2,4-d1n1trotoluene 1n  river,  pond  and bay water, respectively  (Spanggord et
al.,  1980; Zepp  et al., 1984).  Blodegradatlon  has  also  been  observed to be
a  relatively  rapid  transformation   process  during  some   screening  studies
(Davis  et  al.,   1981;  Spanggord   et al.,  1980).   2,4-D1n1trotoluene  and
2,6-d1n1trotoluene could potentially  adsorb  to  humus  and   clay  partlculate
matter  and  sediments  since polynltroaromatlc  compounds  have the  ability to
form  very  stable  charge-transfer complexes with  more  highly electronegative
aromatic compounds (Callahan et al., 1979).
0069h                               -1-                              11/13/86

-------
                                  TABLE 1-1

           Selected Physical  and Chemical  Properties  and  Half-lives
                        for 2,4- and 2,6-01n1trotoluene
        Property
            Value
                               Reference
Chemical class:

Chemical formula:
nltroaromatlc
Molecular weight:

Melting point:


Boiling point:



Vapor pressure:




Water solubility:
Log octanol/water
partition coefficient:
B1oconcentrat1on factor
Soil adsorption
coefficient:

Half-lives 1n
  air:
  water:
2,4-dlnltro-toluene

182.14

300°C (slight decomposition)
for 2,4-ONT; NA for 2,6-DNT

67-70°C for 2.4-DNT
64-66°C for 2,6-ONT


2,4-: l.lxlO~* mm Hg at 20°C
(extrapolated)
2,6-

2,4-
2,6-

2,4-

2,6-

2,4-
2.6-

2.4-
2.6-
2.87x10"* mm Hg at 20°C

300 mg/i at 22°C
NA

1.98

1.76 (estimated)

19-25 (estimated)
13 (estimated)

190-285 (estimated)
216 (estimated)
2,4- and 2,6-: 8.0 hours
(estimated)

2,4-: 1.7 days
                                                              2,6-dlnltrotoluene
Verschueren,
1983

Aldrlch, 1984
Verschueren,
1983

Spanggord
et al., 1980

Pella. 1977

Dunlap, 1981
Hansch and Leo,
1985
U.S. EPA, 1986c

Lyman et al.,
1982

Lyman et al.,
1982
                            U.S. EPA, 1986b
                            Zoeteman
                            et al., 1980
NA = Not available
0069h
        -2-
                                   11/13/86

-------
    Information  regarding  the persistence of  2,4- and 2,6-d1n1tr1toluene 1n
soil  could not  be  located In  the  available  literature.   B1odegradat1on of
2,4- and  2,6-d1n1trotoluene  under  aerobic and  anaerobic  conditions  In water
suggests  that these compounds may undergo mlcroblal decomposition In soil.
    The  estimated  K     values  of  the  dlnltrotoluenes  Indicate that  some
leaching  may occur, but  that  chemical  binding with humus and clay components
of soil may reduce the probability of leaching  (Callahan et al.,  1979).
0069h                               -3-                              11/13/86

-------
           2.   ABSORPTION  FACTORS  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Hodgson  et  al.   (1977)  reported  that  60-90%  of  a  dose  of  l*C-r1ng
labelled dlnltrotoluenes was absorbed within 24 hours of  oral  administration
In  rats.   The  2,4-1somer was  absorbed more  readily  than  the  2,6-lsomer.
U.S. EPA  (1981) stated that,  based upon  urinary  and fecal excretion  find-
Ings,  only  8-12% of  an  administered  oral  dose of  [l4C]-2,4-d1n1trotoluene
was  absorbed  1n mice,  but  that  75-85% of  the dose was  absorbed  In  rats,
rabbits, dogs and monkeys.
    Mori et al.  (1978)  observed peak levels  of  radioactivity  In the blood of
male rats  at  6 hours  after a  single oral  22.2 mg/kg  dose   of  3H-2,4-d1-
nltrotoluene.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Turner  (1986)  analyzed  urine  samples  from  workers  exposed   to  mixed
Isomers of  dlnltrotoluene, and found  that urinary  excretion  of  metabolites
                                                      i
of  dlnltrotoluenes   Increased  during  the  workday  and  declined   to  nearly
undetectable  levels  by the  start of  the  next  workday.  These  data suggest
that rapid absorption  of  dlnltrotoluenes occurs  following  Inhalation,  but no
conclusions  can  be   drawn  regarding   the   proportion  of  Inhaled  material
absorbed.
0069h                                -4-                              07/31/86

-------
                3.   TOXICITY  IN  HUMANS  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   Ellis  et  al.   (1985)  treated  male and  female beagle  dogs
with 1, 5 or  25  mg/kg/day  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  1n gelatin capsules for 4 or 13
weeks  before  sacrifice.   At 5  and 25  mg/kg/day,  the Intensity of  neuro-
toxlclty, ranging  from  1ncoord1nat1on  and  stiffness to  total  limb paralysis,
was  directly  related  to both dose  and duration  of exposure.   Hematologlcal
changes (methemoglob1nem1a,  compensatory anemia)  and testlcular degeneration
were observed  1n the 25 mg/kg/day  dogs.   As  part  of a chronic study,  Ell 1s
et al.  (1985)  found neuropathy  and anemia  1n  dogs  treated  for  13 weeks  with
10 mg/kg/day  2,4-d1n1trotoluene.   During  this  13-week  period,   no dog  given
0.2  or  1.5  mg/kg/day  was apparently affected;  the  dose of  1.5  mg/kg/day can
therefore be  considered  a  NOEL  for subchronlc  oral  exposure  to 2,4-d1n1tro-
toluene.
    Twenty-six week dietary studies  using rats  that  were  fed with  mlxed-
Isomer  dlnltrotoluene,  revealed   methemogloblnemla,   anemia,   myocarditis,
extramedullary hematopolesls, bile  duct  necrosis  and testlcular degeneration
at 35  mg/kg/day (CUT,  1982).   Effects at  14 mg/kg/day were  restricted to
Increases 1n  hepatic  weights,  leukocytosls,  corneal aberrations  and  yellow
hepatic foci; 3.5  mg/kg  caused  a statistically significant decrease  1n  body
weight gain.
    Hong  et al.  (1985)  found  that dietary  administration of  2,4-d1n1tro-
toluene  (0.2%)  for 13 weeks caused Inhibitions  In weight gain  and  hepato-
cellular dysplasla  In male mice, whereas 0.7X was associated  with mortality.
Several  other  subchronlc  studies  In  rats  (Lee  et al.,  1985; NCI,  1978;
Kozuka et al.,  1979)  and mice  (NCI,  1978) either  reported effect levels at
doses  considerably  higher  than  those  used by  Ellis et al. (1985)  and  CUT
0069h                               -5-                              11/13/86

-------
(1982),  or  do not  describe their  results  In  adequate  detail for  reliable
evaluation and Interpretation.
    In  the  only  available  study  of the  subchronlc  oral  toxldty of  pure
2,6-d1n1trotoluene (Ellis et al.,  1976), dogs  were  treated for 13  weeks  at
4,  20  or  100 mg/kg/day  In gelatin  capsules,  and  rats  and  mice were  fed
dietary levels of 0.01, 0.05 or 0.25%.   This  Isomer  produced  effects similar
to  those  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene.  These   effects  Included  decreased  muscular
coordination,  weight  loss,  methemoglob1nem1a,  anemia,  and  splenic, CNS  and
testlcular  damage.    A  subchronlc  NOAEL   for   2,6-d1n1trotoluene  was   not
defined In this experiment.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  subchronlc   Inhalation
toxldty of 2,4- or 2,6-d1n1trotoluene could  not be located  In the available
literature.
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.  The CUT  (1982) administered  technical  grade  dlnltrotoluene
(consisting of  a  mixture  of  Isomers)   to  rats  of  both  sexes  In feed  at
dietary  concentrations  that  provided  doses  of  3.5,   14.0 and  35.0  mg/kg
bw/day for 78 weeks.  Rats  at  the  high  concentration were sacrificed at  week
55  Ui  extremis.   A  statistically  significant and dose-related  depression  In
rate of body weight gain  was noted  1n all  treated  groups  during the first  52
weeks  of  the  experiment.  Hematologlcal  data  suggested  that a   low  grade
regenerative  anemia  occurred  In   high-dose  males and  females.   Treatment-
related  elevated  relative  liver  and brain  weight  In  all  treated  rats  and
elevated relative kidney  weights  In all but  the low-dose males were consis-
tently observed.   Gross necropsy revealed white or yellow foci  In  the livers
of  all  treated  rats.   At termination, hlstopathologlcal  evidence  of hepato-
toxlclty, chronic  Interstitial nephritis  and  parathyroid  hyperplasla  were
observed In all treated groups.

0069h                               -6-                               11/13/86

-------
    In another chronic  rat  study,  diets  containing 0,  0.0015, 0.01 and 0.07%
2,4-d1n1trotoluene  were administered to  groups  of  38  males and  38  females
(Elll-s et  al.t  1979; Lee  et  al., 1985).   After  12 months,  eight  males  and
eight females from  each group were killed  and examined,  while the remaining
surviving  rats  were sacrificed  after  24 months.   Weight gain  1n high-dose
animals was  markedly reduced, reaching  a  plateau after  2  months  1n  females
and  4  months In  males.  Growth  In  middle-dose  males  and   females began  to
decrease  during  month  9,  while  low-dose  rats had  growth  rates  comparable
with  controls.    Anemia,  partially  compensated  as  evidenced  by  Increased
retlculocyte counts,  was  prominent 1n middle- and  high-dose males and high-
dose  females  after  12  months.   Cumulative deaths  for  high-dose  males  and
females were  significantly higher than  In  controls; 50% mortality occurred
1n high-dose rats  by about month  20 and  1n controls by  about month 23.  The
most striking lesion was the  progressive  development of  hyperplastlc  fod  1n
the liver, the severity of  which  was  dose-dependent.  These alterations were
observed 1n all male treatment groups and  In  high-dose  females.   Neoplastlc
nodules were  also  present  In the majority of high-dose males  and females.
Hemos1deros1s of the spleen occurred 1n a majority of high-dose rats.
    Similar  hepatic  changes  were  found  1n  dogs  treated  with  capsules
containing 1.5  or  10 mg/kg/day  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  for  104-108  weeks  (Ellis
et al.,  1985).   Dogs were  more  susceptible to neurotoxlc  effects than were
rats.  An  Intake  of  0.2  mg/kg/day had  no  effect.  The  Investigators found
compensatory anemia at  the high concentration.
    Toxlclty data  from  Hong  et al.  (1985)  for 2,4-d1n1trotoluene  failed  to
define chronic thresholds 1n  mice  because mice appear  to be less susceptible
than rats  and experiments  1n  mice used  higher dietary  concentrations.  In a
chronic experiment  using  rats and mice,  the NCI  (1978)  observed  treatment-
related Inhibition  of  body weight gain  1n  both  species, but  no  evidence  of

0069h                               -7-                              11/13/86

-------
hlstopathologlcal  changes.  These  studies  are  of IHtle value  1n  assessment
of chronic toxldty risk  because  adverse  effects were observed at 80 ppm  In
the diet, the lowest dietary concentration  tested.
    Pertinent data  regarding the chronic oral  toxldty  of  2,6-d1n1trotoluene
could not be located 1n the available literature.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  McGee et  al.  (1942)  observed  that  workers   exposed  to
unspecified levels  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  experienced an unpleasant  metallic
taste, headache,  muscular  weakness,  dizziness,  pallor,  cyanosis  and anemia.
    There were no  additional  data  1n  the  available literature on the  toxic
effects of  d1n1trotoluene Isomers  after chronic Inhalation exposure, except
for occupational  studies  which  measured  the  effects of exposure upon repro-
ductive performance (Section 3.3.2.).
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND  OTHER REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.  F344 rat  dams  administered  14-150  mg/kg/day technical  grade
dlnltrotoluene on  gestation days  7-20 had  no significant differences  from
controls  1n  the  numbers  of  resorptlons,  or  dead or  live  fetuses (Price  et
al.,  1985).   At  150  mg/kg/day, there  was  a  3-fold  Increase,  over  control
values.  In  prenatal  mortality.   At 100 mg/kg/day,  fetuses  had  significantly
decreased  retlculocyte and  red  cell  counts.   Mortality   1n   the  dams  was
Increased  at  the  high  dose.    Related  studies  (Ellis  et  al.,  1979: Smith,
1983)  Indicated  the  absence  of  fetal effects  below  level;   that  produced
maternal toxldty.
    In chronic dietary  studies  with 2,4-dlnltrotoluene,  decreases  1n sperma-
togenesls,  testlcular  atrophy,  degeneration  of  the  seminiferous  tubules  and
deficiencies  In  oogenesls were  found  1n  rats at 0.57  mg/kg bw/day  (Lee  et
al., 1985), 1n mice at  14 mg/kg bw/day (Hong et  al., 1985) and  1n dogs  at 25
mg/kg  bw/day  (Ellis et al.,  1985).   In  a  3-generatlon rat  study,  however,


0069h                               -8-                              07/31/86

-------
Ellis  et  al.  (1979) found  that  dietary Intakes of 0.57-45  mg/kg  bw/day,  1n
both males  and  females, had  no  treatment-related  effects on  any  Indices  of
reproduction, 1n  spite of  the  hlstologlcal evidence  of adverse  effects  on
germ cell production In males.
    Pertinent data  regarding the  reproductive effects  of  oral exposure  to
2,6-dlnltrotoluene could not be located In the available literature.
3.3.2.   Inhalation.   Ahrenholz  (1980) studied the  reproductive  effects  of
exposure  to  mixed  Isomers  of dlnKrotoluene  1n  male workers  \n  a toluene-
dlamlne  plant.   Measured  exposure  levels  were  0-0.10  mg/m3.   There was  a
slight,  not  statistically  significant Increase In the  number  of spontaneous
abortions  1n  the wives  of  dlnltrotoluene-exposed  workers and  a significant
reduction  1n  the  sperm count of exposed workers,  relative  to controls.   The
sperm count of the  control  (nonexposed) group,  however,  was  abnormally high,
obscuring the significance of the results.
    Hamlll et al.  (1982) studied the effects  of  exposure  to concentrations
of  dlnltrotoluene  and  toluene  dlamlne   that  were  within  the  limits  of
unspecified OSHA  standards.   In 119  controls  and  84 exposed  workers,  there
were  no effects  on measures  of reproductive  performance.   Including  sperm
counts  and morphology,  serum FSH, testlcular  volume,  and complete  urogenltal
examination.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    Alcohol  Ingestlon  has  a  synerglstlc  effect on  the toxlclty  of  2,4-d1-
nltrotoluene  (U.S.  EPA, 1980a).  Exposed  workers  who drank  alcohol  shortly
after  a workshlft  experienced  substernal  pressure,  precardlal  palpitation,
fullness of the head,  and  severe acute nines:.   U.S.  EPA (1980a)  noted  that
alcohol  Ingestlon  usually  Increases   susceptibility  to cyanosis  associated
with 2,4-d1n1trotoluene.
0069h                               -9-                              11/12/86

-------
                             4.  CARCINOGEN!CITY
4.1.   HUHAN DATA
    Pertinent data  regarding  the carcinogenic effects  1n  humans of  oral  or
Inhalation  exposure  to  2,4- or  2,6-d1n1trotoluene could  not  be located  In
the available literature.
4.2.   BIOASSAY
4.2.1.   Oral.  Several  long-term  dietary cancer  bloassays with  relatively
pure  2,4-d1n1trotoluene   and a  technical grade  mixture  of  dlnltrotoluenes
have been performed and  were recently  reviewed by  U.S.  EPA (1986a).   Because
of  the  time and  budgetary  constraints  of  this  task,  only  salient  data
pertaining to the Issue  of  the cardnogenldty of  the  dlnltrotoluene Isomers
will be presented.
    NCI (1978) performed a  cancer bloassay using  rats  and  mice  of both sexes
with practical  grade  2,4-d1n1trotoluene of -95%  purity.  The nature  of  the
Impurities was  not  reported.  Rats  received  diets  containing  0, 80  or  200
ppm and  mice received diets containing 0,  80 or  400  ppm.  Test diets  were
fed for 78  weeks  and  untreated diets were fed for  an  additional  26  weeks  to
rats and 13  weeks to  mice  before termination.  Survival  did not  appear to  be
affected  by  treatment.    Although   neither   species   had  a   significantly
Increased Incidence  of malignant tumors,  male rats  In  both treated  groups
had an Increased  Incidence of  benign subcutaneous  flbromas  and  high-dose
female rats  had an Increased Incidence of  benign  mammary fIbroadenomas.
    In another  study  with  technical  grade 2,4-d1n1trotoluene,  diets  contain-
ing 0,  0.0015,  0.01  or  0.07X were  fed to rats   for  24  months  (Lee  et  al.,
1978;   Ellis  et  al..  1979).  The on'ij   statistically significant  Increase  of
tumor   Incidence was  In the occurrence  of hepatocellular carcinomas  alone  or
combined with neoplastlc  nodules and the occurrence of  benign  tumors 1n the


0069h                               -10-                             11/13/86

-------
mammary gland  alone or combined with  malignant tumors, both  tumor  types  1n
female  rats.   Although  shortened  llfespans  were  observed   In  middle- and
high-dose rats of both  sexes, mortality  did  not appear to affect the expres-
sion  of  the carc1nogen1c1ty  of the  test  chemical, which  was judged  to  be
weak (U.S EPA.  1986a).
    Ellis  et al.  (1979)  fed diets  containing technical  grade  2,4-d1n1tro-
toluene at  0,  100,  700 or 5000 ppm to mice  for 24 months.   Mortality In the
high-dose  mice  precluded  their  Inclusion  In   the  data  analysis.   The  most
noteworthy  observation  was an  Increased Incidence  of  kidney tumors  In 700
ppm male mice.
    An extensive  study  using  rats  by CUT  (1982)  contrasts  the  oncogenldty
of  the purified  2,4-lsomer  with   that  of  technical  grade  dlnltrotoluene.
Technical grade dlnltrotoluene was  fed  1n  the  diets to rats to provide dally
dosages of  0,  3.5,  14.0  or  35.0 mg/kg/day  for up to 104  weeks.   The tech-
nical  grade material  used  consisted  of 76.4% 2,4-, 18.8%  2,6-  and smaller
amounts of  the  other  Isomers of dlnltrotoluene.   The  carcinogenic  potential
of  the  technical  material appeared to  be much greater  than  that  of 2,4-d1-
nltrotoluene alone.  Malignant  tumors  that  Included  a  high  Incidence  of
hepatocellular  carcinomas  and  a  few  cholanglocardnomas  (considered  to  be
rare  In  rats)  were noted  In  100% of  high-dose  male  and female  rats  that
survived >12 months.
    The greater  oncogenlc  potential of  the  technical  material compared with
relatively  pure 2,4-d1n1trotoluene  was attributed  by Popp  and Leonard (1982)
to  the greater oncogenldty of  the  2,6-1somer.  These  Investigators observed
that 100%  of all  rats  fed  14 mg/kg/day, and  95% fed 7 mg/kg/day  of >99.9%
pure 2,6-d1n1trotoluene  developed  hepatocellular  carcinomas  within  1 year.
0069h                               -11-                             11/12/86

-------
In contrast,  27  mg/kg/day >99.9% pure 2,4-d1n1trotoluene  Induced  no  hepatic
neoplasla after a comparable  1-year  period.   Actual Incidence data were  not
provided.   In conjunction  with  results   from  Initiation-promotion  studies
(Section 4.3.),  these data suggest  that   the  2,6-1somer  Is the more  potent
hepatocardnogen.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.  Pertinent  data regarding  the Induction  of  cancer  1n
experimental  animals  after  Inhalation exposure  to dlnUrotoluene could  not
be located 1n the available literature.
4.3.    OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Popp and  Leonard (1982)  tested  2,4-,  2,6- and technical grade  dlnltro-
toluene as  Initiators In  a  short-term assay In which  rats  were  treated  with
the  test chemical  orally  and   subjected  to  partial  hepatectomy  12  hours
later.   The  presence of  GGT+ foci  in  the  liver,  suggestive of  Initiating
activity,  was  observed  only   for   2,6-d1n1trotoluene   and   the   technical
product.   In  a  promotion  experiment  (Popp  and   Leonard,  1982),  positive
results  (Increased   GGTt  foci)  were   observed   for  both  the   2,4- and
2,6-1somers,  with  the   2,6-lsomer  yielding  the   stronger  response.    The
experiment  was  conducted  In  rats  Initiated with  a   single  IntraperHoneal
Injection of  diethylnltrosamlne; the  test  chemicals were  fed  1n  the  diet for
12 weeks.   These studies  suggest that  only  the  2,6-1somer  has  detectable
Initiating  activity,  out that  both   2,4-  and  2,6-d1n1trotoluene may act  as
promoters, with the 2,6-lsomer having the  greater  potency.
    In a two-stage  skin-painting  study using mice,  2,6-  but not  2,4-d1nltro-
toluene  given  as   Initiators   followed   by  promotion   with  tetradecanoyl
phorbate  acetate  Increased  the  Incidence  of  squamous  cell   carcinomas,
although the  result was  not statistically  significant.
0069h                               -12-                             11/12/86

-------
    Neither 2,4- nor  2,6-d1n1trotoluene  Induced Increases In  lung  tumors  In
Strain A ratce (Slaga et al., 1985; Stoner et al., 1984; Schut et al.,  1982).
    The genotoxlclty  of  the various dlnltrotoluene  Isomers  has  been  studied
extensively, and was  recently reviewed  by  U.S.  EPA  (1986a).   Both  2,4- and
2,6-d1n1trotoluene were  slightly  mutagenlc  In Salmonella  typhlmurlum strain
TA98  (Couch et  al.,  1981).   Other  studies  Indicated  that  these  Isomers
Induced frameshlft  mutations   In  S. typhlmurlum  strains  TA1536, TA1537  and
TA1538 (Toklwa et al., 1981).
    Neither Isomer caused  unscheduled  DNA synthesis In vitro  In  primary rat
hepatocytes  (Bermudez  et  al.,  1979),  although  a  single  dose of  technical
grade  dlnltrotoluene  In  male rats  Induced  significant  repair  activity  _^n
vivo   (Mlrsalls   and  Butterworth,   1982).    Pure   2,4-dlnltrotoluene   was
Ineffective  In  the whole  animal  assay  and  the Induced repair  activity was
attributed  by   the  authors  (Mlrsalls  and  Butterworth,    1982)   to   the
2,6-lsomer.  At high doses, both  2,4-  and 2,6-d1n1trotoluene have been found
to cause  chromatld  breaks  In  kidney cells and  lymphocytes from rats  (Lee  et
al.,  1978).   Dominant  lethal assays  1n male  rats  and  mice  have  revealed
equivocal,  but  generally  negative  results (Ellis  et al.,  1979;  Borzelleca
and Carchman, 1982).
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    Based   upon  positive  data  for  oncogenldty  from bloassays 1n  both  rats
and mice  (Ellis et al.,  1979), and  1n  the absence of appropriate human data,
2,4-d1n1trotoluene can be  classified an  IARC  Group 28 carcinogen;  that 1s,
this  chemical  Is  probably carcinogenic   In  humans, based upon  experimental
animal  studies.    According  to  U.S.  EPA  (1986d)   guidelines,  2,4-dlnHro-
toluene would  also be classified  as an  EPA  Group   82  carcinogen  because  of
the existence  of sufficient  evidence  of carclnogenlclty  In  two  species  of


0069h                               -13-                              01/12/87

-------
animals (Ellis et al., 1979).  It should be noted, however,  that  the effects
of the oncogen1c potential of 2,6-d1n1trotoluene (as a minor contaminant) on
the carclnogenldty of  the  practical  grade 2,4-dlnltrotoluene used 1n  these
experiments Is unclear.
    The results of Popp and Leonard (1982) and CUT  (1982) clearly establish
the carclnogenldty of  2,6-d1n1trotoluene In animals,  resulting  In  an  IARC
classification 1n Group  2B,  or  EPA Group  82.
0069h                               -14-                             01/12/87

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

    Based  upon  a human  consumption of  2  l of water  and 6.5 g  of  fish and
shellfish  dally,  the  U.S.  EPA   (1980a)  determined  ambient water  quality
criteria  for  2,4-d1n1trotoluene   of  1.1,  0.11  and  0.011   vg/l,  based  on
excess   cancer   risks   of   10~5,   10"'  and  10~7,   respectively.    These
criteria were based   on Increased Incidences of  liver  and  mammary tumors In
rats fed 2,4-d1n1trotoluene In the diet  for 24 months (Lee et al., 1978).
    ACGIH  (1985) adopted  a  TLV-TWA  for   commercial  dlnltrotoluene of  1.5
mg/m3, accompanied  by a "skin" designation for hazards  from dermal  absorp-
tion, and  deleted  the TLV-STEL of 5 mg/m3.  ACGIH  (1986)  reported  that the
TLV-TWA  was  derived  by analogy to nltro and dlnltrobenzenes.   ACGIH (1986)
based  the  values   for   each   compound   upon  earlier  work   Indicating  that
methemogloblnemla was the first toxic  symptom observed.   The OSHA (1985) PEL
for dlnltrotoluene (not otherwise  specified) Is also 1.5 mg/m3.
0069h                               -15-                             11/12/86

-------
                             6.  RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfO$)
    Both  2,4- and  2,6-d1n1trotoluene  have been  shown  to be carcinogenic  In
experimental animals by  the  oral  route, and data are  sufficient  for  deriva-
tion  of  a  q *  for   the  2,4-lsomer   only.   Calculation  of  an  RfDc^  or
              '                                                         *
SO
RfDSI  1s therefore Inappropriate for these compounds.
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
    Both 2,4- and  2,6-d1n1trotoluene  have been  shown  to be  carcinogenic  In
experimental animals by  the  oral  route,  and data are  sufficient  for  deriva-
tion  of  a  q,*  for  the  2,4-1somer  only.  Calculation  of  an  RfDQ or  RfD,
1s therefore Inappropriate for these compounds.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^)
6.3.1.   Oral.   The  chronic  bloassays most  relevant  for  assessment  of  the
oral  carcinogenic  potency of 2,4-d1n1trotoluene  were  performed In rats  and
mice by Ellis et al. (1979).  When  animal  results were analyzed Individually
(U.S.  EPA,   1986a),  the  Incidences  of  combined mammary/hepatic   tumors  In
female  rats  was strongly  concentration-related  (Table  6-1).   The U.S.  EPA
(1986a) observed differences  In average body weight  among  the various  groups
of  female  rats,  and converted  rat  doses  (mg/kg/day)  to  comparable  human
doses by multiplying each rat dose  by  the cube  root  of the  ratio of  human
body  weight  (70 kg)  to  rat  body  weight,  within each  dietary group.   The
human q *   based  upon  the computerized  model   of Howe and Crump  (1982),  1s
0.683 (mg/kg/day)"1
    The U.S.  EPA  (1980a, 1982)  used the  Incidence  of  combined  liver  and
mammary tumors  1n  female  rats 1n  the 2-year study  by Lee et  al.  (1978)  as
the  basis  for   their  q *  of  0.31  (mg/kg/day)"1  (Table 6-2).  Although  the
Lee  et  al.  (1973)  study was  apparently the  same as  the Ellis  et  al.  (1979)
0069h                               -16-                             05/13/87

-------
                                  TABU  6-1
                    Cancer  Data  Sheet  for  Derivation  of  q-|*
                         1n Female  Sprague-Dawley  Rats
Compound:  2,4-d1n1trotoluene

Reference:  Ellis et al., 1979; U.S. EPA, 1986a

Species, strain, sex:  rat, Sprague-Dawley, female

Body weight:  0.425 kg control; 0.425 kg low dose; 0.410 kg middle dose;
              0.325 kg high dose (measured)

Length of exposure (le) = 24 months

Length of experiment (Le) = 24 months

Llfespan of animal (L) = 24 months

Tumor site and type:  liver - hepatocellular carcinoma, neoplastlc nodule;
                      mammary gland - adenoma, fIbroadenoma, fibroma,
                      adenocardnoma/carclnoma

Route/vehicle:  oral, diet
 Experimental Doses
    or Exposures           Transformed Dose                Incidence

(ppm)
0
15
100
700

(mg/kg/day)
0
0.706
0.514
45.3
(mg/kg/day)

0
0.129
0.927
7.557
No. Responding/No.

11/23
12/35
17/27
34/35
Examined





Unadjusted q-|* from study = not calculated (see text)

Human q-|* = 0.68 (mg/kg/day)-1
0069h                               -17-                             01/22/87

-------
                                   TABLE  6-2

           Cancer  Data  Sheet  for  Derivation of  q-]*  1n  Female  CD  Rats


Compound:  practical-grade 2,4-d1n1trotoluene

Reference:  Lee et al., 1978; U.S. EPA, 1980a

Species, strain, sex:  rat, CD, female

Body weight:  0.464 kg

Length of exposure (le) = 720 days

Length of experiment (Le) = 750 days

Llfespan of animal (L) = 750 days
             Transformed Dose
               (mg/kg/day)
           Incidence
   No.  Responding/No.  Tested
                   0.0
                   0.75
                   5.0
                  35.0
             11/31
             13/43
             18/35
             35/43
Human q-|* = 0.31 (mg/kg/day)-1
0069h
-18-
01/20/87

-------
study,  the  tumor Incidence data  used  by the  U.S.  EPA (1980a) were  not  the
same as those of  Ellis  et  al.  (1979),  probably because the Lee et al. (1978)
version was  a  preliminary report.   In a  later published  version  of  this
study  (Lee  et  al.,  1985),  still another  set of hepatic/mammary  tumor  data
was presented.   Because  the  Incidence  data of the  Ellis  et  al.  (1979)  study
were  the  most  clearly  presented,  H   Is  appropriate  to  adopt   the  current
q *  of 0.683  (mg/kg/day)'1  derived  by U.S.  EPA  (1986a)  as  appropriately
representing  the   carcinogenic   potency  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene   based   on
experiments In rats.
    The chronic  mouse bloassay  (Ellis  et al.,  1979)  can  also  be used  for
carcinogenic  risk  assessment.    Since  most  high  concentration  males  died
within  1  year,  data  are  restricted  to  the controls and  two  lower  dose
dietary groups.   A  human  q  * of  0.391  (mg/kg/day)'1 was  derived  by  the
U.S. EPA (1986a) based on  the  occurrence of  total kidney tumors  1n male rats
(Table 6-3)!
    Because  the  q^  of 0.683  (mg/kg/day)'*  (U.S.  EPA,  1986a)  based  upon
the  rat data  of  Ellis  et al.   (1979)  1s  higher  and  represents  the  more
conservative evaluation  of the  carcinogenic  risk  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  to
humans, It  1s adopted  as the  most appropriate estimate of  carcinogenic  risk
for the purposes of this document (see  Appendix).
    The  U.S.  EPA   (1986a)  also  derived   human  q  *s  of   0.23  and   0.21
(mg/kg/day)'1 for  technical  grade dlnltrotoluene based on the  Incidence  of
liver  tumors  In  male  (Table  6-4) and  female (Table  6-5)  rats   1n the  CUT
(1982)  study.   Data sufficient  for  derivation  of an  oral  q *  for  2,6-d1-
nltrotoluene were not available,  although  this Isomer  appears  to  be the more
potent carcinogen.
0069h                               -19-                             11/13/86

-------
                                   TABLE  6-3

          Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|* 1n Male Swiss Mice


Compound:  2,4-d1n1trotoluene

Reference:  Ellis et al., 1979; U.S.  EPA, 1986a

Species, strain, sex:  mouse, Swiss,  male

Body weight:  0.04 kg (measured)

Length of exposure (le) = 24 months

Length of experiment (Le) = 24 months

Llfespan of animal (I) = 24 months

Tumor site and type:  kidney; cystic  papillary adenoma, cystic papillary
                      carcinoma, solid renal  cell carcinoma

Route/vehicle:  oral, diet
Experimental Doses        Transformed Dose                 Incidence
   or Exposures             (mg/kg/day)           No. Responding/No. Examined
      (ppm)


         0                       0                            0/20
       100                      13.3                          4/21
       700                      96.9                         16/17


Unadjusted q-|* from study = 3.2xlO-2 (mg/kg/day)-1

Human q-|* = 0.39 (mg/kg/day)-1
0069h                               -20-                             01/22/87

-------
                                   TABLE  6-4
           Cancer  Data  Sheet  for  Derivation of  q-|*  1n  Male  F344  Rats

Compound:  technical-grade dlnltrotoluene
Reference:  CUT,  1982
Species, strain, sex:  rat, F344, male
Body weight:  0.37 kg control; 0.35 kg low dose; 0.29 kg high dose;
              (measured)
Length of exposure (le) = 104 weeks
Length of experiment (Le) = 104 weeks
Llfespan of animal (L) = 104 weeks
Tumor site and type:  liver; hepatocellular carcinoma, neoplastlc nodule
Route/vehicle:  oral, diet
Experimental Doses
or Exposures
(mg/kg/day)
0
3.388
13.451
Transformed Dose
(mg/kg/day)
0
0.579
2.160
Incidence
No. Responding/No.
10/61
19/70
23/23
Examined

Unadjusted q-|* from study = not calculated (see text)
Human q-|* = 0.23 (mg/kg/day)-1
0069h                               -21-                             01/22/87

-------
                                  TABLE 6-5
          Cancer  Data  Sheet  for  Derivation of q-j*  1n  Female  F344 Rats

Compound:  technical-grade dlnltrotoluene
Reference:  CUT, 1982
Species, strain,  sex:   rat,  F344,  female
Body weight:  0.26 kg control; 0.24 kg low dose; 0.19 kg high dose;
              (measured)
Length of exposure (le) = 104 weeks
Length of experiment (Le) =  104 weeks
Llfespan of animal (L) = 104 weeks
Tumor site and type:  liver; hepatocellular carcinoma, neoplastlc nodule
Route/vehicle:  oral,  diet
Experimental Doses
or Exposures
(mg/kg/day)
0
3.379
13.633
Transformed Dose
(mg/kg/day)
0
0.510
1.902
Incidence
No. Responding/No.
5/57
12/61
66/68
Examined

Unadjusted q-|* from study =' not calculated (see text)
Human q-|* = 0.21 (mg/kg/day)-1
0069h                               -22-                             01/22/87

-------
6.3.2.   Inhalation.    Data   regarding   the   carclnogenlclty   of   Inhaled
dlnltrotoluene could  not  be  located 1n the  available  literature and EPA has
not undertaken route  to  route  extrapolation  of carcinogenic response.  Thus,
an Inhalation risk assessment Is not presently available.
0069h                               -23-                             01/12/87

-------
                                7.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1985.
TLVs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances  In  the Work  Environment
Adopted by ACGIH for 1985-1986.   Cincinnati, OH.   p.  17.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986.
Documentation of  the  Threshold  Limit Values and Biological Exposure  Indices
for Substances 1n Workroom A1r,  5th ed.   Cincinnati,  OH.   p. 216.

Ahrenholz,  S.H.   1980.    Health  hazard  evaluation  determination  report  no.
HE79-113-728.   Olln  Chemical   Company,   Brandenburg,  KY.    NIOSH   Report
HE-79-113.  NTIS PB81-167819.  (CA  95:155707w)  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Aldrlch.   1984.    1984-1985  AldMch  Catalog/Handbook  of Fine   Chemicals.
Aldrlch Chemical  Co.,  Milwaukee,  UI.   p.  468.

Bermudez, E., D. Tlllery  and B.E.  Butterworth.   1979.  The effect of  2,4-d1-
amlnotoluene  and  Isomers  of dlnltrotoluene  on  unscheduled DNA synthesis  1n
primary rat hepatocrytes.   Environ. Mutagen.  1(4):  391-398.

Borzelleca,  J.F.  and  R.A.  Carchman.   1982.   Effects  of selected  organic
drinking  water  contaminants on male reproduction.   EPA  600/1-82-009.   NTIS
PB82-259847.  149 p.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Callahan,  M.A.,   M.W.   Sllmak,   N.W.  Gabel,  et  al.   1979.    Water-related
environmental fate  of  129 priority pollutants.  Vol.  II.   EPA  440/4-79-029B.
U.S. EPA, Washington,  DC.

0069h                               -24-                             11/13/86

-------
CUT  (Chemical  Industry  Institute of  Toxicology).   1982.   104-Week chronic
toxldty study In rats:  D1n1trotoluene.   Final  Report.  CUT Docket #12362.

Couch,  D.B.,  P.P.  Allen  and  D.J.  Abernathy.   1981.   The  mutagenldty  of
dlnltrotoluene 1n Salmonella typhlmurlum.  Mutat. Res.  90: 373-384.  (CHed
1n U.S. EPA, 1986a)

Davis,  E.M.,  H.E.   Murray,   J.G.   Llehr  and   E.L.   Powers.    1981.   Basic
mlcroblal  degradation  rates  and chemical  by-products  of  selected  organic
compounds.  Water Res.   15(9):  1125-1127.

Dunlap,  K.I.    1981-.   Nitrobenzene  and  nltrotoluenes.   Iji:  K1rk-0thmer
Encyclopedia  of  Chemical  Technology,  Vol.  15,  3rd  ed.,  M.  Grayson  and  D.
Eckroth, Ed.  John Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.,  New  York.  p. 925-926,  930-931.

Ellis,  H.V.,  III,  J.V.  Dllley  and  C.C. Lee.   1976.   Subacute toxldty  of
2,4-d1n1trotoluene   and   2,6-d1n1trotoluene.     Toxlcol.   Appl.  Pharmacol.
37(1): 116-117.

ElHs, H.V.,  S.H. Hageusen,  J.R. Jodgson,  et al.  1979.  Mammalian Toxldty
of  Munition  Compounds.   Phase  III.  Effects  of  Lifetime  Exposure.   Part  I.
2,4-D1n1trotoluene.   NTIS  AD-A077692.   281  p.

Ellis,  H.V., C.B.   Hong,  C.C.  Lee,  J.C.  Dacle and  J.P.  Glennon.   1985.
Subchronlc  and   chronic  toxldty  studies of   2,4-d1n1trotoluene.    Part  I.
Beagle dogs.  J.  Am. Coll.  Toxlcol.   4:  233-242.
0069h                               -25-                             07/31/86

-------
HamHI, P.V., E. Ste1nbe1ger, R.J. Levlne, L.J. Rodr1guez-R1gan, S. Lemeshow
and J.S.  Avrumln.   1982.   The ep1dem1olog1cal  assessment  of  male reproduc-
tive hazard  from occupational exposure  to  IDA and DNT.   J.  Occ.  Med.  24:
985-993.  (CHed 1n U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Hansch,  C.  and  A.J.   Leo.   1985.   MedChem  Project  Issue No.  26.    Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hodgson,  J.R.,  S.W.  Hwang,  3.C.  Dacre  and  C.C.  Lee.   1977.   Comparative
absorption,  distribution, execution  and  metabolism of  2,4,6-tr1n1trotoluene
(TNT)  and Isomers of d1n1trotoluene (DNT)  1n  rats.  Fed. Proc.   36: 996.

Hong,   C.B.,  H.V.  Ellis,  III,  C.C.  Lee,  H.  SpMnz,  J.C.  Dacre  and J.P.
Glennon.  1985.    Subchronlc  and  chronic  toxldty studies  of  2,4-d1n1tro-
toluene.  Part III. CD-I  Mice.   3.  Am.  Coll.  Toxlcol.   4(4): 257-269.

Howe,  R.8. and K.S. Crump.  1982.  GLOBAL 82.   A computer  program  to  extrap-
olate   quantal  animal   toxldty  data  to  low  doses.   Prepared  for  Office  of
Carcinogen Standards,  OSHA,  U.S.  Dept.  of  Labor under  Contract No.  4145C25C3.

Kozuka,  H.,  M.A.  Mori and  Y.  Naruse.   1979.  Metabolism and toxldty  of
dlnltrotoluenes: Tox1colog1cal study  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene In  rats In  long-
term feeding.  J. Toxlcol. Sd.   4(3):  221-228.

Lee, C.C., H.V. Ellis, III, J.J. Kowalskl, et  al.  1978.   Mammalian toxldty
of  munition  compounds.   Phase  II.  Effects  of multiple  doses.   Part  II.
2,4-01n1trotoluene.   Midwest  Research  Institute,   Kansas  City,  MO.   NTIS  AD
A061715.  (CHed In U.S.  EPA,  1980a,  1981)

0069h                               -26-                             07/31/86

-------
Lee, C.C.,  C.B.  Hong, H.V.  Ellis,  III,  J.C. Oacre and  J.P.  Glennon.   1985.



Subchronlc  and  chronic  toxldty studies  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene.   Part  II.  CD



rats.  J. Am. Coll. Toxlcol.  4(4): 243-256.







Lyman,  W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and O.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical



Property Estimation Methods.  McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.   p.  4-9,  5-5.








McGee,  L.C.,  A.  McCausland,  C.A.  Plume, et  al.   1942.  Metabolic  disturb-



ances  In  workers   exposed  to   dlnltrotoluene.    Am.  J.  Digest.  D1s.   9:



329-331.   (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1981, 1986a)







Mlrsalls,  J.C.  and  B.E.  Butterworth.   1982.   Induction of  unscheduled  DNA



synthesis  In  rat  hepatocytes  following  _1ri  vivo  treatment  with  dlnltro-



toluene.   Carclnogenesls (London).  3(3): 241-246.







Mori,  M.,  Y. Naruse  and H.  Kozuka.   1978.   Studies  on the metabolism  and



toxldty  of dlnltrotoluenes.   Absorption and  excretion of  tritium-labeled



2,4-d1n1trotoluene    (3H-2,4-d1n1trotoluene)    In   rats.     Radlolsotopes.



27(12): 715-719.







NCI  (National  Cancer  Institute).   1978.   Bloassay  of  2,4-d1n1trotoluene  for



possible carc1nogen1c1ty.   Carclnogenesls  Tech.  Rep. Ser. No.  54.  Publ.  No.



78-1360.







OSHA (Occupational  Safety  and  Health Administration).   1985.    OSHA  Safety



and Health Standards.  29 CFR 1910.1000.
0069h                               -27-                             11/12/86

-------
Pella, P.A.  1977.  Measurement of  the  vapor pressures of TNT, 2,4-d1n1tro-
toluene and EGON.   J.  Chem.  Thermodyn.   9:  301-305.

Popp, 3.A. and T.B. Leonard.   1982.   The use of ±n vivo  hepatic  Initiation-
promotion  systems  1n  understanding  the hepatocardnogenesls  of  technical
grade dinltrotoluene.    Toxlcol.  Pathol.  10: 190-196.   (Cited  1n U.S.  EPA,
1986a)

Price, C.J., R.W.  Tyl,  T.A.  Marks,  L.L. Paschke, T.A. Ledoux and  J.R.  Reel.
1985.   Terataloglc evaluation  of  dinltrotoluene  1n  the Fischer  344  rat.
Fund. Appl. Toxlcol.   5: 948-961.   (Cited In  U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Schut, H.A.J., T.R. Loeb and G.D. Stoner.   1982.  Distribution,  elimination
and  test  for  carclnogenlcHy  of   2,4-d1n1troto1uene  In   Strain  A   mice.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  64(2):  213-220.   (Cited 1n  U.S. EPA,  1986a)

Slaga, T.L., L.L.  TMplett, L.H.  Smith  and H.P.  WHschl.   1985.   Carclnogen-
esls of  Nitrated Toluenes  and  Benzenes, Skin and Lung Tumor  Assays  1n  Mice.
Final Report.  NTIS DE85012081/WEP.   p.  33.   (CHed  1n  U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Smith,  K.N.   1983.   Determination  of  the  reproductive   effects  In mice  of
nine  selected   chemicals.    Final   Report.    NIOSH   Contract   210-81-6011.
Cincinnati, OH.  (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1986a)
0069h                               -28-                             07/31/86

-------
Spanggord,  R.J.,  T.  M111,  T.W. Chou,  W.R.  Mabey,  J.H.  Smith  and S.  Lee.
1980.  Environmental  fate  studies  on certain munitions wastewater  constitu-
ents.   Final  Report,  Phase I  -  Literature  Review.   Prepared  by  Stanford
Research  Institute,  Menlo  Park,   CA  under Contract  No.  DAMO  17-78-C-8081.
U.S. Army Medical Res. and Develop. Command,  Fort Derrick,  MD.

Stoner, G.D., E.A.  Grelslger,  H.A.J. Schut,  et  al.  1984.  A comparison  of
the  lung  adenoma  response  1n  Strain A/J mice after  1ntraper1toneal  and  oral
administration  of  carcinogens.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   72(2):  313-323.
(Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1986a)

Toklwa, H., R.  Nakagawa  and Y. Oha1sh1.   1981.  Mutagenlc  assay of aromatic
nltro  compounds  with Salmonella  typhlmurluro.   Mutat.  Res.   91:  321-325.
(Cited In U.S. EPA,  1986a)

Turner, M.J..   1986.   Identification and  quantification  of urinary  metabo-
lites of  dlnltrotoluenes In occupatlonally exposed  humans.   CUT Activities.
6: 1-6.

U.S.  EPA.  1980a.   Ambient Water  Quality  Criteria  Document   for  01n1tro-
toluene.    Prepared  by  the  Office  of  Health  and   Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the  Office
of Water  Regulations  and Standards,  Washington,  DC.   EPA 440/5-80-045.   NTIS
PB81-117566.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.  Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  1n  the Preparation  of
Hwlth  Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the   Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal  Register.   45(231):  79347-79357.

0069h                               -29-                             02/06/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1981.  TSCA  Interagency Testing  Committee.   Hazard  Information
Review.    01n1trotoluenes   IR-232.    Prepared   by  Environmental   Control,
Rockvllle, MD.  Prepared under EPA Contract No.  68-01-5789.

U.S.  EPA.   1982.    Errata   for   Ambient  Water  Quality  Criteria  Documents
Prepared by the  Office of Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,   Cincinnati,  OH  for  the   Office  of  Water
Regulations and Standards,  Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1983a.   Reportable Quantity  Document for  Benzene,  l-Methyl-2,4-
D1n1tro (2,4-D1n1trotoluene).  Prepared by  the Office  of  Health  and Environ-
mental Assessment, Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,
OH for the Office of  Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1983b.   Reportable Quantity  Document for  Benzene,  l-Methyl-2,6-
DlnHro (2,6-01n1trotoluene).  Prepared by  the Office  of  Health  and Environ-
mental Assessment, Environmental  Criteria,  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,
OH for the Office of  Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.  1983c.  Methodology and  Guidelines  for  Reportable Quantity Deter-
minations  Based  on Chronic  Toxlclty Data.   Prepared by the  Office  of Health
and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria  and Assessment  Office,
Cincinnati,  OH  for   the  Office  'of  Solid  Waste  and  Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.
0069h                               -30-                             02/06/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Health  and  Environmental  Effects  Profile  for  D1n1tro-
toluenes.   Prepared  by  the  Office of  Health and  Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH  for  the Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Graphic  Exposure  Modeling System (GEMS).   Fate  of  Atmo-
spheric  Pollutants  (FAP).   Office of  Toxic  Substances, U.S.  EPA  -  computer
printout (1986).

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.   MedChem software  release  3.32,  CLOGP3  computer printout:
Graphic  Exposure  Modeling System (GEMS).   U.S.  EPA,  Office  of  Toxic  Sub-
stances. Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986d.    Guidelines   for   Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

Verschueren, K.  1983.   Handbook  of Environmental  Data  on  Organic  Chemicals,
2nd. ed.  Von Nostrand Co., New York.   p. 573-574

Zepp, R.G., P.F. Schlotzhauer, M.S.  Simmons, G.C.  Miller, G.L.  Baughman and
N.L. Wolfe.  1984.  Dynamics of  pollutant photoreactlons  In  the hydrosphere.
Fresentlus  Z.  Anal.  Chem.  319: 119-125.

Zoeteman, B.C.J., K.  Harmsen,  J.B.H.J.  Llnders, C.F.H. Morra  and  W.  Slooff.
1980.   Persistent organic  pollutants  In  river  water and groundwater of the
Netherlands.  Chemosphere.   9(4): 231-249.
0069h                               -31-                             02/06/87

-------
                                   APPENDIX

                    Summary Table  for 2,4-D1n1trotoluene*
Route   Species   Experimental      Effect         q-|* Cancer  Potency Slope
                  Exposure/Dose                        (mg/kg/day)-1


Oral    rat       15, 100 and   hepatocellular            0.68
                  700 ppm 1n    tumors; mammary
                  diet for      benign and
                  104 weeks     malignant tumors
                  (14 and 95
                  mg/kg/day)
'Source: Ellis et al., 1979

                                                                            f
0069h                               -32-                             01/22/87

-------