TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (fiettt rttd Instruction* on the reverse btfort completing)
1. REPORT NO.
                             2.
                                                           3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NO
                                                                 PB88-182878/AS
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
                                                           5. REPORT DATE
  Health  Effects  Assessment for  Parathion
                                                           6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTMOR(S)
                                                            I. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of Research  and Development
 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
 Cincinnati. OH  45268  	
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                EPA/600/22
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
   This report  summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to a  preliminary interim
 assessment  of  adverse health effects associated with specific chemicals  or compounds.
 The Office  of  Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses these  documents in
 preparing cost-benefit analyses under Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under
 CERCLA.  All estimates of acceptable intakes and- carcinogenic potency presented in
 this document  should be considered as preliminary and reflect limited resources
 allocated to this  project.  The intent  in  these assessments is to suggest acceptable
 exposure levels  whenever sufficient data are available.  The interim  values presented
 reflect the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure or risk to the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible,  two categories of values have been
 estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not the  endpoint of
 concern).   The first, RfD5 or subchronic reference dose, is an estimate  of an exposure
 level that  would not be expected to cause  adverse effects when exposure  occurs during
 a limited time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level  that would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects when  exposure occurs for a significant portion
 of the lifespan.  For compounds for which  there is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity, qi*s have been computed,  if appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation  data  if available.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSAT1 Field/Group
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (Thu Report)

  Unclassified	
                           21. NO. Of PAGES
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (Thupagt)
                                                Unclassified
                           22. PRICE
EPA F««* 2220-1 ((*•». 4-77)   PMKVIOU* COITION i* OMOLCTC

-------
                                            EPA/600/8-88/047
                                            July, 1987
          HEALTH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT
                FOR PARATHION
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            CINCINNATI, OH 45268

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


    This   document   has   been   reviewed   In   accordance  wHh   the  U.S.
Environmental  Protection  Agency's  peer  and administrative  review policies
and approved for publication.  Mention of trade names or  commercial products
does not constitute endorsement  or recommendation  for  use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    This report  summarizes  and  evaluates Information relevant  to  a  prelimi-
nary Interim assessment of  adverse  health effects  associated  with  parathlon.
All  estimates  of acceptable  Intakes and carcinogenic  potency presented  1n
this document  should be  considered  as   preliminary  and  reflect limited  re-
sources allocated to this project.  Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and  environmental
data were located through on-Hne  literature  searches of  the  TOXLINE and the
CHEMFATE/OATALOG data bases.   The basic literature  searched  supporting  this
document 1s current  up  to May,  1986.  Secondary sources  of Information  have
also been relied upon In  the  preparation of  this  report  and represent large-
scale  health   assessment   efforts   that  entail  extensive  peer  and  Agency
review.  The  following  Office of Health and  Environmental  Assessment (OHEA.)
sources have been extensively utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.    1984b.    Reportable  Quantity   Document  for  Parathlon.
    Prepared  by  the  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment   Office,
    Cincinnati,  OH  for  the Office  of  Emergency and  Remedial  Response,
    Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.    1986a.    Reference  Doses   (RfOs)   for   Oral   Exposure.
    Parathlon  CAS# 56-38-2.   Prepared by the  Environmental  Criteria  and
    Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

    The Intent 1n these assessments  1s to suggest  acceptable  exposure levels
for  noncardnogens   and  risk   cancer   potency  estimates   for  carcinogens
whenever sufficient  data  were available.  Values  were not  derived or larger
uncertainty factors  were  employed  when  the  variable data  were   limited  1n
scope   tending   to   generate  conservative   (I.e.,   protective)   estimates.
Nevertheless,   the  Interim  values  presented reflect  the  relative degree  of
hazard or risk associated  with exposure  to  the chemical(s) addressed.

    Whenever  possible,  two  categories   of  values  have  been   estimated  for
systemic  toxicants   (toxicants   for  which  cancer   1s not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first, RfD$ (formerly AIS)  or  subchronlc reference  dose,  Is
an estimate of an exposure  level  that would  not be expected to  cause adverse
effects when  exposure occurs during a   limited time Interval   (I.e.,  for  an
Interval that  does   not constitute  a significant  portion of the  Hfespan).
This type of exposure estimate  has not   been  extensively  used,  or  rigorously
defined, as  previous risk  assessment  efforts  have been primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from toxicants  In  ambient  air  or water  where  lifetime
exposure  1s  assumed.    Animal   data  used   for   RFD$   estimates   generally
Include exposures with  durations of 30-90  days.   Subchronlc human  data  are
rarely  available.   Reported exposures  are usually  from  chronic occupational
exposure  situations   or from reports  of acute accidental  exposure.   These
values  are   developed    for  both   Inhalation  (RfD$j)   and   oral   (RfD$o)
exposures.
                                      111

-------
    The  RfO  (formerly  AIC)  Is   similar  In  concept  and  addresses  chronic
exposure.  It Is an estimate of an  exposure  level  that  would not be expected
to cause  adverse  effects when exposure  occurs  for a significant  portion  of
the  Hfespan  [see  U.S.  EPA (1980)  for  a  discussion  of this  concept].   The
RfO  Is  route-specific  and  estimates  acceptable  exposure  for  either  oral
(RfDfj)  or  Inhalation   (RfOj)  with  the  Implicit  assumption  that  exposure
by other routes 1s  Insignificant.

    Composite  scores   (CSs)  for  noncardnogens  have  also  been  calculated
where  data permitted.   These  values  are  used  for  Identifying  reportable
quantities  and  the methodology for  their development  1s  explained  1n  U.S.
EPA (1984a).

    For compounds  for  which there 1s  sufficient evidence  of cardnogenldty
RfD$  and  RfD  values are not derived.    For  a discussion of  risk  assessment
methodology for  carcinogens refer  to  U.S.  EPA (1980).   Since  cancer  Is  a
process  that  Is  not characterized by  a  threshold, any  exposure contributes
an Increment  of  risk.   For  carcinogens,  q-|*s have been computed,  1f appro-
priate, based on oral  and Inhalation data 1f available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT


    In  order  to  place the  risk  assessment  evaluation  1n  proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this  series  as  well   as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of  the quantitative estimates presented.

    Inhalation data were  not available for parathlon;  therefore,  Inhalation
risk  assessment   values  could  not be  calculated.   RfDg and  RfQ$o  values
of 0.006 mg/kg/day  or  0.4 mg/day for a 70 kg  human were derived  based  on  a
human study  In  the  CBI files showing a NOAEL  for  erythrocyte  chollnesterase
Inhibition.  Whether  this value  1s  protective against the  reproductive  and
carcinogenic  effects   of  parathlon  Is uncertain.   A  CS  of   36,  based  on
reduced survival  at weaning  at  30 ppm 1n the  diet  of  rats  1n  a 3-generat1on
study located In  the  CBI  files  (U.S. EPA, 1986b),  was  the  highest CS calcu-
lated for parathlon.

    The available  data on cardnogenlclty places  parathlon In  EPA Group C.
This category Is  for  the  agents with limited  evidence  of cardnogenlclty In
animals, and no  or Inadequate data on humans  (U.S.  EPA, 1986c).

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for  EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Dr.  Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn  were  the  Technical   Project  Monitors  and  John  Helms  (Office  of
Toxic  Substances)  was  the Project  Officer.   The  final  documents   In  this
series  were  prepared  for  the  Office  of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,
Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the  following U.S. EPA  offices provided  review  comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office  of  Air Quality Planning and Standards
         Office  of  Solid Waste
         Office  of  Toxic Substances
         Office  of  Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided  by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH

Technical  support   services  for  the  document   series  was provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Jacky Bohanon and Kim Davidson
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
2.


3.









4.






5.
6.



ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2. INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
. 3.3.1. Oral 	
3.4., TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	 	
4.4. WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfOs) 	
6.1.1. Oral (RfDso) 	
6.1.2. Inhalation (RfOcr) 	
Page
. . . 1
. . . 3
. . . 3
. . . 3
4
4'
. . . 4
7
. . . 7
. . . 7
. . . 9
. . . 9
. . . 9
. . . 10
. . . 13
. . . 13
13
. . . 13
. . . 14
. . . 14
15
. . . 17
... 18
18
... 18
... 18

-------
                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
     6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
            6.2.1.   Oral (RfD0)	   18
            6.2.2.   Inhalation (RfDi) 	   19

     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q-|*)	   19

            6.3.1.   Oral	   19
            6.3.2.   Inhalation	   21

 7.  REFERENCES	   22"

APPENDIX: Summary Table for Parathlon	   33
                                     vlll

-------
                             LIST  OF  ABBREVIATIONS

ATP                     Adenoslne trlphosphate
AUC                     Area under the curve
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
bw                      Body weight
CBI                     Confidential business Information
CHO                     Chinese hamster ovary
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
ODC                     01ethyld1th1ocarbamate
DNA                     Oeoxyr1bonucle1c acid
EEG                     Electroencephalogram
HA                      Health advisory
ID                      Median lethal dose
MED                     Minimum effective dose
MFO                     Mixed function oxldase
MTD                     Maximum tolerated dose
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
PEL                     Permissible exposure limit
ppm                     Parts per million
RBC                     Red blood cell
RfD                     Reference dose
RfDT                    Inhalation reference dose
RfDQ                    Oral reference dose
RfD_                    Subchronlc reference dose
   o
RfD_T                   Subchronlc Inhalation reference dose
                        Subchronlc oral reference dose
RQ                      Repor table quantity
SCE                     Sister chromatld exchange
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
                                      1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    Selected  chemical   and   physical  properties  and  environmental  fate  of
parathlon  are  presented  In  Table 1-1.  Synonyms  for  parathlon  are:   phos-
phorothlolc  add;  0,0-d1ethyl-0-(4-n1trophenyl)ester;  0,0-d1ethyl-0-p-n1tro-
phenyl  phosphorothloate;  d1ethyl-p-n1trophenyl  monothlophosphate and  DNTP.
Trade  names  are:   S.N.P.;   E605;   AC3422;   ENT  15108;   Alkron;  Aileron;
Aphamlte; Etllon; Folldol; Fosferno; N1ran; Paraphos; Rhodlatox and Thlophos".
    The half-life of parathlon  In  the  atmosphere could not be located In the
available  literature.    Monitoring  data  Indicate   that   parathlon  and  Us
Initial  transformation product,  paraoxon, may  exist  In  the atmosphere  In
vapor  form  and  adsorbed  onto  airborne  partlculate  matter (Sanborn  et  al.,
1977).
    The  persistence  and  fate  of  parathlon  residues  In environmental  media
depend on  such  factors as temperature, humidity, light, pH,  the presence  of
organic  matter,  and  micro- and  macroflora and  fauna  prevailing  1n  a  given
environment.  These  parameters  Influence  activation  or  chemical/biological
degradation  of  the parent molecule  to  nontoxlc  products  (Felsot and  Dahm,
1979).
    In water and  soil,  parathlon  1s decomposed  primarily  by  biologically
mediated  hydrolysis.   Mechanisms   of  decomposition  also   Include  other
biological processes,  oxidation and sunlight.   Laboratory and  field studies
of  the persistence  of parathlon  show  half-lives  of  the parent  compound,
resulting  from  normal   usage concentrations,  to be  on  the order  of  days  In
ambient  waters.   In  soils,  the  half-life of  parathlon  ranges  from a  few
weeks to a few months,  depending on soil  characteristics and the climate.
OlOlh                               -1-                              07/15/87

-------
                                  TABLE  1-1

                   Selected  Chemical  and  Physical  Properties
                      and  Environmental Fate  of  Parathlon
        Property
         Value
      Reference
CAS number:

Chemical class:


Molecular weight:


Chemical formula:


Melting point:

Boiling point:
  (760 mm Hg)

Vapor pressure:

Water solubility:

Log octanol/water
  partition coefficient:

Bloconcentratlon factor:

Soil adsorption
  coefficient:

Half-lives:
  A1r
  Water
  Soil
56-38-2

organophosphorus
pesticide

291.27
       -
C2H50/    \—
                -N02
6°C

375°C


3.78xlO"5 mm Hg at 20°C

24 mg/i at 25°C

3.83


103-480 (estimated)

1038-1388
965-1724
Sanborn et al., 1977

Sanborn et al., 1977

Hansch and Leo, 1985


Lyman et. al., 1982

Felsot and Oahm, 1979
Sharon et al., 1984
NA
days
a few weeks to a few months
NA = Not available
OlOlh
        -2-
             02/04/87

-------
           2.   ABSORPTION  FACTORS  IN  HUMANS  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Parathlon  1s  readily  absorbed from the gastrointestinal  tract.   This  Is
Indicated  In  a study by  Morgan et  al.  (1977) where volunteers  were  given 2
mg  parathlon  orally.  Within  48  hours,  30-40X  of the administered  dose  of
parathlon  was  excreted  In  the  urine as  metabolites  (paranltrophenol,  alkyl
phosphates  and   thlophosphates).    Braeckman   et   al.   (1983)   studied  the
absorption  of   parathlon  1n  ethanol-propylene   glycol   following   gavage
administration  to  mongrel  dogs  of  either  sex.   They   found  that  radio-
labeled  parathlon  appeared  to  be well  absorbed  since urinary  excretion  of
radioactivity following oral dosing  at  5  mg/kg  was nearly as complete and as
rapid as  following  Intravenous  dosing with a dose of  the same  size.   Orally
administered  parathlon  appeared  to  have very  low bloavallablllty  (<30X),
compared with  Intravenous dosing, evaluated by comparing  the AUCs  for  serum
concentration,  as  a  result  of first-pass  extraction  In  the  liver.   Addi-
tional  quantitative  data  regarding  the  absorption  of  parathlon  following
oral administration could not be  located  In the available literature.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Parathlon  Is  absorbed  during   Inhalation  exposure  (Simpson  and  Beck,
1960; Wolfe et  al.,  1967).  To  prevent  dermal  exposure, Durham  et al.  (1972)
exposed an Individual completely  covered  with  rubber  and  plastic clothing to
mist  from  an   alrblast  spray   machine   during  parathlon   application  In
orchards,  and  collected  tissue  for  several  days.   p-NltrophenoT,  a  major
metabolite of  parathlon,  was  excreted  1n  urine  collected  within 24  hours
after exposure.   More quantitative  data  regarding the  Inhalation absorption
of  parathlon  could  not  be  located  In the available  literature.  Absorbtlon
from  dermal  exposure may exceed respiratory  Intake   (Cohen et al.,  1977;
Malbach et al., 1971).

OlOlh                               -3-                               07/15/87

-------
                3.  TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   Moeller  and  Rider  (1961)  gave  parathlon  In  corn  oil  1n
gelatin capsules at  doses  of 3-4.5 mg/day for 28 days and  6.0  mg/day  for  43
days to volunteers.  Plasma  and RBC  chollnesterase  activities were depressed
by 10-15% at 6 mg/day,  but  not at  lower  doses.
    In  a  study  by  Rider  et al.  (1969),  groups  of  volunteers   (five  test
subjects and  two  controls/dose  level)  were given  capsules containing  3.0,
4.5,  6.0  or  7.5  mg  parath1on/day.   Controls  received  capsules  containing
corn oil.  Before  treatment, baseline measurements  of  plasma and  RBC  cholln-
esterase activities  were made.  Depression of  plasma or  RBC  chollnesterase
activity was  not observed  at doses <6.0 mg/day.  At  6.0 mg/day,  there was a
slight but not  significant depression of  plasma  chollnesterase  activity.   In
subjects receiving 7.5  mg/day,  average plasma  chollnesterase  activity  was
depressed  by  -15%  from  days  4-35   as   compared   with   baseline  values.
Individual  variability was  fairly  large, with  three  subjects  at  7.5  mg/day
showing  a   decreased  plasma chollnesterase  activity  of  50-55X.   At  7.5
mg/day, a 7-10X depression  In baseline  RBC chollnesterase  activity was  also
observed.
    Edson et  al.  (1964) exposed  humans orally  to  parathlon  at  0   or  0.6
mg/day,  which was  Increased to  4.8 mg/day  during  weeks  4-13  (TWA =  4.0
mg/day) or  to 1.2  or 2.4 mg/day for <70 days.   Four  females received  7.2 mg
parath1on/day,  5  days/week   for  6  weeks.    RBC and  plasma  chollnesterase
activity levels  were 84  and  63X of  control levels,  respectively, In  females
treated  at  7.2  mg/day.   No  changes   In  chollnesterase  activities  were
observed at lower dose levels.
OlOlh                               -4-                              10/21/86

-------
    Edson et al. (1964) also  studied  the  effects  of  parathlon In female rats
(20/dose level) and female pigs  (2/dose level).   The  rats  received parathlon
In the  diet  at 0,  0.05,  0.5  and 5 ppm for 84 days.   The pigs were fed  diets
containing parathlon at 0, 0.2,  1.0 and 5 ppm for -89 days.   The 0.2 and 1.0
ppm  levels   1n  pigs were  Increased  to  25  and   100  ppm on  days  33-72  and
73-114,  respectively.   No effects  on  general  health, growth,  food consump-
tion  and gross organ  appearance were observed  In  either  rats  or  pigs.   In
rats  fed diets containing  parathlon  at  0.5 and  5  ppm, RBC chollnesterase
activity was 46 and 20% of levels  In controls after  12  weeks.   In rats,  RBC
chollnesterase activity appeared to be Inhibited more than  plasma chollnes-
terase  activity.   In  pigs fed  100  ppm,  RBC chollnesterase  activity  was  20%
of controls after  7 weeks  of  treatment.
    Edson  and  Noakes  (1960)   fed   female   Hlstar   rats   diets  containing
parathlon at 1, 5,  25  and 125 ppm  for 16  weeks.   The high-dose group showed
reduced  weight gain,  cardiac  fibrillations,  nervousness   and  mortality  of
7/10  rats.   In rats fed  25  ppm, slight  fibrillations were  observed.   At  5,
25 and  125  ppm, dose-related  depressions  of RBC.  plasma and brain chollnes-
terase  activities  were observed.   RBC chollnesterase activity was  28,  8  and
4% of  control  levels  at  5,  25  and 125 ppm,  respectively.   Plasma chollnes-
terase  activities  were 44 and 10%  of control  levels  at  25 and  125 ppm,  and
brain chollnesterase activities  were  89  and  9%  of control levels  at  25  and
125 ppm, respectively.
    In  a 90-day  study  by  Olkshlth  et al. (1978), a  group of  12 adult male
white  rats   were  treated  by  gavage  with  parathlon  1n  peanut  oil  at  2.6
mg/kg/day.    Controls received peanut  oil.   Four of  the treated  rats  died,
but  no  gross  abnormalities  were  observed  In   any  organ.   A  significant
decrease In  activity  of  sucdnlc dehydrogenase  In the  liver  (p<0.0011)  and


OlOlh                               -5-                              10/21/86

-------
kidney  (p<0.001)  was observed.   There was  also a  significant  decrease  In
ATPase  activity  of  the liver  and kidney  (p<0.0011}.   In  the  testes,  the
activities of most enzymes remained unchanged except  for  Increased  (p<0.011)
ATPase activity.  A  significant  (p<0.001)  Inhibition  of  acetylchollnesterase
activity In the blood and brain was observed.
    Frawley and  Fuyat  (1957)  fed  groups of  one male and  one female  mixed
breed dogs  diets  containing  parathlon at  1,  2 and  5 ppm (0.021, 0.047  and
0.117 mg/kg/day)  for  24 weeks.  Controls received parathlon-free diets.   In
dogs  fed  0.047 and  0.117 mg/kg/day,  plasma  chollnesterase  was  reduced  by
30-50%  compared  with controls.   At 0.021  mg/kg/day, plasma  chollnesterase
was reduced 20%.   RBC chollnesterase was  reduced  20-40% 1n dogs treated  at
the highest dose.   Dogs  recovered from these effects  6-8  weeks  posttreatment.
    In a  study  by Hassan and  Cueto  (1970),  two groups of New Zealand  white
rabbits were  dosed  by  gavage with  parathlon  1n  peanut oil  at  0.5 or  1.0
mg/kg/day for  222  days.  After  100 days  of treatment, urinary excretion  of
4-hydroxy-3-methoxymandel1c   acid  (vanniylmandellc  acid)  and  5-hydroxy-3-
Indoleacetlc add  was  higher  In  treated  rabbits  than  In  controls.   These
Increases  were  considered   by  the  Investigators   to be  a  result  of  the
Increased  metabolism rates  of  catecholamlnes  and serotonin,  respectively.
Analysis  of  blood  and   urine  levels  of  amlno adds  showed no  significant
differences between control and treated groups.
    In a  study  by Barnes and  Denz (1951), groups of 36 male and 36  female
albino rats were  fed diets containing parathlon (76.8%  pure)  at  10,  20,  50,
75  or  100  ppm,  6  days/week  for  1   year;  30  rats/sex fed  diets  without
parathlon served as  controls.   Treatment  of rats fed  100 ppm was  terminated
after 19  days  as  a  result of  excessive  mortality; 58/72 rats died  and most
only  consumed  5 g  of food/day.  Treatment of rats fed 75 ppm was  terminated


OlOlh                               -6-                              10/21/86

-------
after  27  days;  53/72  rats  died.   Pathological  changes  In  the submaxlllary
gland,  pancreas,  spleen  and  thymus  were  observed  1n  these  two  high-dose
groups.  Survivors of  these  groups  recovered after treatment termination and
showed  no  permanent  effects when  examined  after  1 year.   In  rats  fed diets
containing 50 ppm, mortality was  -61% with  most deaths occurring before week
4.  Body weight gains  were  reduced  In both  males and females at 50 ppm; this
effect  was  not  attributed  to  decreased food  consumption.   Moribund an1mal,s
showed  changes 1n the  submaxlllary  gland, pancreas, spleen or thymus with no
hlstologlcal  changes   noted  1n  survivors.    Rats   fed  10 or  20 ppm  gained
weight  comparably with   controls,  and  chemical-Induced  mortality was  not
Indicated.  No  treatment-related  pathological changes  1n rats fed  10  or  20
ppm were observed.  Chollnesterase activities apparently were not monitored.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.    Kay  et  al.   (1982)  studied the effects  of  exposure  to
parathlon  spray  on   blood  Chollnesterase  activities  of  apple  growers.
Sprayers were exposed  for -2 days  at  10-day Intervals for 2 months; airborne
concentrations  1n the  breathing  zone  ranged  from 2-15  mg/m3.   Depression
of RBC  Chollnesterase  activity averaged  21% for  all  sprayers.   No signifi-
cant  difference   In  RBC   Chollnesterase  activity  levels  were  noted between
sprayers  reporting  symptoms  and  those  apparently  symptom-free;  symptoms
Included  nausea  and  headaches.   The  relative   Importance  of  Inhalation
exposure versus  dermal  exposure was not determined.
3.2.    CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   In  an  NCI  (1979) bloassay,  groups  of  50  Osborne-Mendel
rats/sex  and  50  B6C3F1  mice/sex  were  fed  diets  containing  parathlon.
Low-dose male  rats  were  fed at 40 ppm  for 13 weeks  then at  30 ppm  for  67
weeks for a TWA of 32  ppm.   High-dose males received diets containing 80 ppm
for 13  weeks  then 60  ppm for  67 weeks for  a TVIA  of 63  ppm.   TWA  doses for
female  rats were  23  and  45  ppm for  low- and  high-dose rats, respectively.

OlOlh                               -7-                              01/27/87

-------
Low-dose  females  received  diets containing  20  ppm for 13 weeks,  30  ppm for
21 weeks  and  20  ppm for 46 weeks,  high-dose females  received diets contain-
ing 40  ppm  for  13 weeks, 60 ppm  for  21  weeks and 40  ppm  for 46 weeks.   All
rats were treated  for  a total  of 80 weeks  followed by a  32-week observation
period.   Matched  controls  from  the  parathlon  bloassay  were  pooled  with
controls  from  other bloassays  for  a total  of  90 male  and   90  female rats,
which were observed for  112 weeks.   Low-dose male mice were  fed parathlon In
                                                                           «
the  diet  at   80  ppm   for  71  weeks with   an  18-week  observation  period.
High-dose male mice received 160  ppm  1n  the diet  for  62 weeks with a 28-week
observation period.  Low- and  high-dose  female  mice  received  80  or 160  ppm,
respectively  for  80  weeks  followed  by  a  9-week  observation  period  for
low-dose mice and  10 weeks  for  high-dose female mice.   Hatched controls  were
pooled  with controls  from other  bloassays  for  a  total of 140 males  and 130
females, which were observed for 90 weeks.
    Rats  showed  lower  mean body  weights. 1n the  high-dose groups  during the
treatment period as compared  with controls.   This  effect  was  particularly
pronounced  In  females  from weeks  14-35.   Body  tremors  and diarrhea  were
observed  In all  treated rats;  these effects were  particularly pronounced 1n
the  high-dose  females.   No  significant  positive   dose-related  trend  1n
mortality was  observed  In either sex.   H1stopatholog1cal  examination showed
no effect on the Incidence of nonneoplastlc lesions.
    Mortality was  not  affected In  female mice, but a positive  dose-related
trend  was observed  1n  males.   Reduced  mean body weight,  body  tremors and
diarrhea  were  observed  1n  all  treated  groups.  H1stopatholog1cal examination
Indicated   that   nonneoplastlc  lesions  were  not   affected  by  parathlon
treatment.
OlOlh                               -8-                              10/21/86

-------
3.2.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  effects  of  parathlon
following chronic  Inhalation  exposure  could not be located  In  the available
literature.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.  In  a  study by  Deskln  et al.  (1979),  pregnant CO  mice  were
treated  by  gavage  with  parathlon  1n  peanut  oil  at  0.01,  0.10 and  1.00
mg/kg/day from  day 2  of  gestation  to  day 15 of  lactation.  Control  mice
received peanut  oil.    Ten offspring at  each  dose were observed  for  toxic
effects on  day  24 postpartum.  Male  offspring showed no  significant  change
(p<0.05) 1n RBC and plasma  chollnesterase.   Female  offspring from dams  dosed
at  >0.01  mg/kg/day  showed  significant  reduction  of  plasma  chollnesterase
activity, but not  RBC chollnesterase activity.   Electrocardiographs  of  male
and female  offspring  showed significant  changes,  but these  are  difficult  to
evaluate without hlstopathologlcal examinations of the heart.
    In a study by  Barnes  and  Denz (1951),  rats were fed diets containing 50,
20  or  10  mg/parath1on/kg  diet  {50,  20  or  10 ppm, 76.8%  pure)  before  mating
through  to  parturition.   Utter  sizes  of  the  50  ppm  diet  rats   were
decreased.   Survival  of neonates  was  Inversely dose-related; there were  no
survivors at  50 ppm,  43% survived at 20 ppm and  100% survived  In the  10 ppm
group  and  controls.   Offspring of the  group  treated  at  10 ppm  were  fed  a
similar diet  and  mated after  178 days.   Five of six mated  females produced
Utters, but  only  7/37 neonates  born  survived more than a  few  days.   Cross
mating of six exposed  females  with control  males  resulted 1n only 2 Utters.
The number  of offspring was normal In these  Utters, but only 38% survived.
Mating  an   exposed F,  male  with control  dams  resulted  1n fertility  and
survival of young that were comparable with control  matings.
OlOlh                               -9-                              01/27/87

-------
    Studies 1n the CBI files  (U.S. EPA,  1986b)  conflict  with  the findings  of
Barnes and  Denz  (1951).    In  a  3-generat1on study  In  rats,  effects on  pups
were observed at  a higher dietary concentration  but  not  at  10  ppm.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    The ability  of  many  agents   to alter  the toxldty of parathlon  has  been
Investigated.   One  of the  most significant ways  to alter  the toxldty  of
parathlon  Is  by   the  Induction  or Inhibition  of drug-metabol'izlng  enzymes.
Hale  rats  have   been found  to  be   less  susceptible   to  the  toxldty  of
parathlon than female rats,  perhaps  as  a result of the Inducing  effects  of
testosterone (Newell and  Ollley, 1978).
    Rats  pretreated with ethylestrenol gained some  protection  from the  toxic
effects  of  parathlon  (Robinson et  al.,  1976).   Norbolethan  and  splrono-
lactone,  two other steroids,  also provided some  protection.
    In a  study  with  rats,  carbon monoxide  exposure  prolonged   time  until
death  caused  by  an  Intraperltoneal  Injection  of  parathlon  (Baeza et  al.,
1972).   Pretreatment  with  turpentine  (Omlrov   and Aberkulov,  1972),   ovex
(Black et al., 1975),  halogenated  benzenes (Townsend and Carlson,  1981)  and
trl-o-tolyl phosphate  (Lynch  and  Coon,  1972) also  provided some  protection
against  parathlon   toxldty.   In  a  study  by   Murphy  (1980),  phenobarbltal
pretreatment was found to protect  against  the antlchoHnesterase  activity  of
parathlon  In  an  unspecified  species.   Pretreatment  with  d1-2-ethylhexyl
phthalate  also  reduced  the  degree   of   chollnesterase  Inhibition  In  rats
caused by parathlon (Srlvastava  et  al.,  1976).
    Homann  et  al.  (1985)  studied  the effect of DDC,  a known  Inhibitor  of
mixed-function oxldase activity, on  the  toxldty of parathlon  to  male  rats.
DOC, when Injected  Into  rats  45  minutes  before  or 10 minutes  after parathlon
Intoxication,  had  no  effect  on  the  survival  rate.   DOC administered  simul-
taneously with parathlon  resulted 1n  the  rate of survival rising 53%.
OlOlh                               -10-                              10/21/86

-------
    Mirer et al.  (1977)  studied the effects of  plperonyl  butoxlde  pretreat-
ment on  parathlon toxldty  In  mice.  An  Injection of plperonyl butoxlde  1
hour  before  parathlon  treatment  resulted  In  a  2-fold  potentlatlon  of
parathlon toxldty.
    A study  by  Vukovlch et  al.  (1971)  examined  the  effects  of  IntraperHo-
neal Injections of chlorpromazlne on  the  oral  toxldty of  parathlon to mice.
Chlorpromazlne  Injected  1   or  6  hours  before  parathlon treatment  Increased
the oral toxldty  of parathlon.   The  toxldty  was decreased when chlorproma-
zlne was  administered  1  day before  parathlon  treatment.   Weiss  and  Orzel
(1967)   found  that  an  Intraperltoneal   Injection  of  reserplne,   chlordl-
azepox1de-HCl,  hexobarbltal  sodium  or   phenobarbltal  sodium  enhanced  the
toxldty of  rats  to 1ntraper1toneally Injected  parathlon  at 2  and 4  mg/kg.
Chlorpromaz1ne-HCl  and  meprobamate  only  Increased  the   toxic  effect  of
parathlon at 4 mg/kg.
    To determine  If  parathlon alters  hepatic mlcrosomal  drug metabolism, the
effect  of  the  pesticide on  hexobarbltal  sleeping times In  mice  was  studied
(Hart  and   Fouts,  1963).   An  1ntraper1toneal   Injection  of parathlon  (2.5
mg/kg)  was administered  to  CF No.  1  white mice.   Significant prolongation of
sleeping times was observed 1 and 3 days  following parathlon Injection.
    A number of  studies  have Investigated the  Interaction  of  parathlon  with
other  pesticides.   Scheln  and  Thomas   (1975)   found  that  oral  doses  of
parathlon and dleldrln caused a  greater  disturbance In testosterone dynamics
1n male mice than  either compound  alone.   The  acute toxldty was found to be
greater  than  additive  when  parathlon   was  administered  with  chlorbufam
(Nledner and von  Oettlngen, 1976),  fenltrotlon  (Kawal  et  al.,   1973)  and
chlordane plus malathlon (KepHnger and Delchmann, 1967).
OlOlh                               -11-                             10/21/86

-------
    Trlolo and Coon (1966) studied the effects of  orally  administered  aldMn
on  the  toxic effects  of oral  parathlon 1n  mice.  They  found  that  1  hour
after aldrln administration parathlon toxlclty was  Increased.  Aldrln  admin-
istered  16  hours  to  12  days  before parathlon  resulted  1n protection  from
parathlon  toxlclty.   This protection  reached a maximum  when parathlon  was
given 4 days after aldrln administration.
    Malathlon,   when administered  with  parathlon   subcutaneously  Into  male
mice, has  been   shown  to have  a less  than additive  effect  (Kawal  et  al.,
1973).  Pretreatment with carbaryl  In the  diet  (Neskovlc, 1979)  or  Undane
(Chadwlck et al.,  1984)  has  also been shown  to  reduce  parathlon  toxlclty 1n
rats.
    The state of the  animal has  also been  shown  to affect  parathlon  toxlc-
lty.  Parathlon  Is  more  toxic  to rats under  35  days of age  (Harbison, 1973;
Benke and  Murphy,  1975)  and  more  toxic to  pregnant  than nonpregnant  mice
(Heltman et  al.,  1983).   Food  restriction (Vllleneuve et  al., 1978)  and low
protein diets (Casterllne and  Williams,  1971; Boyd,  1969; Bulusu and Chak-
ravarty, 1986)  have also been  shown  to Increase parathlon  toxlclty 1n rats.
OlOlh                               -12-                             10/21/86

-------
                              4.   CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
    Pertinent  data  regarding the  carcinogenic  potential  of  parathlon  In
humans  following  oral  or  Inhalation  exposure  could  not  be located  1n  the
available literature.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.   Hazelton and  Holland  (1950)  conducted   a  cancer  bloassay
using  groups of  8-20  male  and  female  albino  rats   (strain  unspecified).
Males were  fed  diets containing  parathlon at 50  or  100 ppm for 100 weeks or
10  or  25 ppm for  88 weeks.   Females were fed  diets  containing parathlon at
10  or  50 ppm for  64 weeks.   Another group of females  was  fed  100 ppm In the
diet  for  an unspecified length of  time.   Ten males observed  for 104 weeks,
20 males observed  for 88 weeks and  6 females observed  for 64 weeks served as
controls.   No  dose-related   effect  on  mortality  was noted.   Hlstologlcal
examination  of  a   limited number  of tissues  from high-dose  group survivors
showed no tumors.
    In  the  NCI (1979)  bloassay,  groups  of  50 male  and  50  female Osborne-
Mendel  rats and B6C3F1  Charles  River  mice  were  fed  parathlon  1n  the  diet
(see  Section  3.2.1.).   Male  rats  received TWA  doses of 32 or  63 ppm, female
rats  23 or  45  ppm.  Rats  were  treated  for 80  weeks  and observed  for  32
weeks.   Male mice  were fed  diets  containing  80 or  160  ppm  for  71 or  62
weeks, respectively, and female mice were fed at  80 or 160 ppm for 80 weeks.
Mice were observed for 9-28 weeks.
    In  rats,  the  Incidence  of adrenal  cortical  adenomas  and  carcinomas  was
Increased;  the  Incidence 1n  low-dose males was 7/49,  In  high-dose males was
11/46,  In   low-dose  females  was   6/47  and 1n  high-dose females  was  13/42.
OlOlh                               -13-                             10/21/86

-------
Incidences  In  controls were  0/9  1n  matched control  males,  3/80  In  pooled
control males,  1/10 1n matched  control females  and  4/78 In  pooled  control
females.   Using  pooled  controls,  these  results  are  significant  by  the
Cochran-Armltage test  for positive  trend (p<0.001), and  high-dose results 1n
both sexes are  significant In  the  Fisher Exact  test  (p<0.002).   The biologi-
cal  significance  of these  results 1s  uncertain.  IARC  (1983)  states  that
"the  significance  of  adrenal  cortical  adenomas  In  aged rats  Is not  well
understood, and  that  adrenal  cortical  carcinomas  occurred  only  1n two  rats
of each sex and treatment group."   NCI  (1979)  reported that  under the condi-
tions  of   the  bloassay,  parathlon  appears  to  be carcinogenic  1n  Osborne-
Mendel rats.
    In  mice,  no  Increased  Incidences  of  neoplastlc  lesions were  observed.
NCI (1979) reported that parathlon was noncarclnogenlc In mice.
    Welsburger  (1982)   reviewed  the  NCI  (1979)  study   and  concluded  that
parathlon  was  not  carcinogenic 1n  mice, but was  suggestive of  neoplasla In
rats.  After review of one  mouse and three  rat  studies,  IARC  judged  the rat
adenomas  to  be of  uncertain   significance,  and  overall  evaluated the  data
base to be Inadequate for  evaluation of  human carcinogenic potential.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  carcinogenic  potential
of  parathlon   following  Inhalation exposure could  not  be  located  In  the
available  literature.
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    IARC  (1983)  has reviewed  mutagenlclty  and  other short-term  studies of
parathlon.  Portions of that review are reproduced as  follows:

    "Parathlon  was  negative   In  the  rec-assay   (differential  killing
    assay  utilizing   H17  rec*   and   M45   rec~   strains  of   Bacillus
    sub* 1 Us)   and  the Escherlchla  coll  Pol-assay  without  exogenous
    metabolic   activation  (Simmon  et al.,  1977).   In  a  large  number  of
    tests  1t   did  not  Induce  gene mutations  In E_.  coll.  Salmonella

OlOlh                               -14-                             03/30/87

-------
    typhlmurlum.   Serratla   marcescens.   Saccharomyces   c.ervlslae   or
    Schlzosaccharomyces  pombe,   with  or  without  exogenous  metabolic
    activation  (Mohn,  1973;  Fahrlg,  1974; Simmon et al.,  1977;  Bartsch
    et al., 1980; Degraeve et al., 1980)."
    "No excess  of  sex-linked recessive lethal mutations was  Induced  In
    Drosophlla  melanoqaster  by  parathlon (99X  pure)  (Valencia,  1977;
    Waters et al., 1982).  Negative  results  have  also  been  reported for
    the Induction  of  unscheduled DNA synthesis by  parathlon  (99% pure)
    In  W138  human flbroblasts,  with or  without  unlnduced mouse  liver
    mlcrosomal fractions (Jones  et al.,  1982;  Waters et  al.,  1982).  No
    dominant  lethal  mutation was Induced  1n mice  fed  parathlon  (99%
    pure)   for seven weeks  at dose levels of  62.5,  125 or   250 mg/kg  of
    diet  (Simmon  et  al.,  1977)  or  following a  single  IntrapeMtoneal
    Injection (Degraeve et al.,  1980)."

    In  a  study  not reviewed by  IARC  (1983),  parathlon  was found  to  Induce
statistically significant  Increases  1n SCE  1n  CHO  cells (Nlshlo  and  Uyekl,
1981).
    Maronpot et al. (1983)  tested parathlon   In the Strain  A  mouse pulmonary
tumor-Induction  bloassay  model.   Groups  of  20 or  30  Strain  A mice of  both
sexes  were  Injected  1ntraper1toneally  with  parathlon  3  times/week  for  8
weeks.  The  doses  used were the MTD,  MTD/2, MTD/4  and MTD/5.  The doses  1n
mg were not  specified.   Vehicle, untreated  and  positive  urethane controls
were  Included  as  part  of the  experiment.    The  mice  were  killed 16 weeks
after  the  last  Injection  and grossly visible  pulmonary  tumors  were counted.
Parathlon   treatment  resulted   In a  significant  (p<0.05)   Increase  In  the
number  of  mice  with   tumors  and  the  multiplicity  of  tumors compared  with
negative controls.  Positive controls responded appropriately.
4.4.    WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    IARC  (1983)  reviewed the weight of  evidence of  the cardnogenlclty  of
parathlon   to humans and concluded that data are Insufficient for evaluation.
    The NCI  (1979) study  resulted 1n suggestive  evidence for cardnogenldty
1n rats.   Male and female  rats  treated  with  parathlon  had  an Increased Inci-
dence  of  combined  adrenal  cortical  adenomas  and  carcinomas.   The biological

OlOlh                                -15-                             03/30/87

-------
significance of  these  tumors  In  aged  rats  1s -uncertain.  Since  the  IARC
(1983)  evaluation,  parathlon  has   tested  positive  In   the  Strain  A mouse
pulmonary  tumor  bloassay model  (Maronpot  et  al.,  1983)  and  this  evidence
together with  suggestive but  uncertain  response  1n  rats  1s  sufficient  to,
place parathlon  1n  EPA  Group  C,  a  possible human  carcinogen.  This  category
1s for  the agents  for which there  Is no evidence  or  no data on  cardnogen-
IcHy In humans and only limited  evidence In  animals  (U.S.  EPA,, 1986c).
OlOlh                               -16-                             03/30/87

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS AND  CRITERIA

    NAS  (1977)  calculated  4.3  ug/kg/day  as  an  RfD  for parathlon  from  the
study by Rider et al.  (1969).   This  value was obtained by applying an uncer-
tainty factor of 10  to  the  dose of  3.0 mg/day that was the lower NOEL.  From
this  level  NAS  (1977) calculated or  suggested a NOA£L  In  drinking  water  of
0.03  mg/i,  assuming 70  kg  as  an  average body weight and an  average dally
water Intake of 2 l, and that 20X of the total Intake  1s from water.
    An  RfD  of 5xlO~3  mg/kg/day can  be  derived  by applying  an uncertainty
factor of 10  to  the NOEL of -50 mg/kg/day  In  the Edson et  al.  (1964) study.
This  dosage  appears  to be  calculated  as the  TWA of  0.6 mg/day  for  4 weeks
raised to 4.8 mg/day  for  an additional  9 weeks,  assuming a human body weight
of  70 kg.   Using   2  l  as  the  average  water  Intake  for  an  average  70  kg
human, and  a  fish   Intake of  0.0065 kg/day  with  a BCF of  347,  0.1  mg/i  can
be recommended as the water  criterion.
    The most  recent  RfD calculated  for  parathlon Is  0.4 mg/day  for  a 70  kg
man  (U.S. EPA,  1986a).   This value was  based on  a human NOEL  of 4.5 mg/day
located  In  the CBI  files   (U.S. EPA,  1986b).  Higher  doses  were associated
with blood chollnesterase Inhibition.
    The  AC6IH (1986)  TLV-TWA  based  on  skin  exposure Is  0.1   mg/m3.   The
OSHA  (1985)  PEL  based on skin  exposure has  also been set at  0.1 mg/m3.   A
tolerance of  1.0 ppm  parathlon has  been  established  for  most  agricultural
commodities  (U.S. EPA, 1983).
OlOlh                               -17-                             07/15/87

-------
                             6.  RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfOc)
                                     d
6.1.1.   Oral  (RfDSQ).    Risk   assessment  of   parathlon  Is   based  on  Us
action  as   a chollnesterase  Inhibitor.   The   threshold  for  chollnesterase
Inhibition varies between  species,  Indicating  that human data would  be most
appropriate for  risk assessment.
    A number  of  RfDs have been  calculated from human data (see  Chapter  5).
The most recent RfO, 0.006 mg/kg/day  (U.S.  EPA,  1986a,d),  was  derived from a
human  study   found  In  the  CBI   files,  which  Identifies  a  human  NOAEL  for
erythrocyte  chollnesterase  Inhibition.   The   value  calculated   from  this
study, 0.006  mg/kg/day or  0.4  mg/day for a 70  kg  human, will  be  recommended
as the RfO-0 for the purpose of  this document.
6.1.2.   Inhalation  (RfO..).    Pertinent  data  regarding   the  toxldty  of
parathlon  following  Inhalation  exposure  could  not   be   located  1n  the
available literature; therefore, an RfOSI cannot be derived.
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
6.2.1.   Oral  (RfDQ).    No  chronic  human  oral  studies   of   parathlon are
available.   Subchronlc  studies  have been  used  to calculate an  RfO.   The most
recent  RfO,  derived  from a   human  NOAEL  for  erythrocyte  chollnesterase
activity found  In a CBI  study, and  an uncertainty  factor  of 10,  Is  0.006
mg/kg/day  or  0.4 mg/day  for  a  70 kg  human  (U.S.  EPA,  1986a,d).   For  the
purpose of  this  document,  these values  will  be recommended as the RfDQ for
parathlon.     Whether   this   level   will   be   protective   against   the
carclnogenldty or reproductive effects  of parathlon Is uncertain.
    In  deriving  an  RQ  for parathlon,  CSs have  been calculated  (U.S.  EPA,
1984b).  The  largest CS  value In this document was derived from the study by
Barnes  and  Oenz  (1951).   This   3-generat1on  study,  however,  used  parathlon
OlOlh                               -18-                             07/15/87

-------
that  was  only  76,8% pure  and  only  six  rats were  used.   Because  of  these
deficiencies  and  because better  studies  are  available,  CS values  from  the
Barnes and Denz (1951) study will not be presented In this document.
    Human  MEOs  derived   In  U.S.  EPA  (1984b)  are  higher  than   the  values
reported  1n  this  document because 1t appears  that  the  cube root  of the body
weight ratio  was  not used to convert from  animal  exposure to  the human MEO.
CSs for parathlon from a number of studies are presented In Table 6-1.
    Data  In  the  CBI files  Indicate  that  the  MEO for  blood  chollnesterase
Inhibition  In humans  Is  0.079  mg/kg/day  or  5.53  mg/day, assuming  a  human
reference  body weight of  70  kg.   This dose  1s associated with an RV.  of
4.4.   Inhibition  of  blood chollnesterase activity  Is assigned an  RV  of  1.
A CS  of  4.4  results.  The  highest  value,  36, was  obtained  from  a 3-genera-
tlon rat study found In the CBI file (U.S.  EPA, 1986b).
6.2.2.   Inhalation  (RfD,).    Pertinent data  regarding  the  toxic  effects
of  parathlon  following  Inhalation  exposure  could  not  be located  1n  the
available literature; therefore, an RfD, cannot be derived.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q.,*)
6.3.1.   Oral.  The  NCI  (1979) bloassay showed  an Increase In  the combined
Incidences of  adenomas and  carcinomas of the  adrenal cortex 1n  rats  of both
sexes.  Adenomas  predominated  1n  the study,  and  the significance  of  these
tumors 1n  aged rats Is  uncertain.   Because of the weakness In  the specific
animal cancer  data  for  parathlon,  a q,*  value will  not  be  calculated  for
this document.
    In a  report  1n  the  CBI files  (U.S.  EPA,  1986b),  the  OPP reinterpreted
the  results  of  the NCI  (1979)  bloassay.   Using  the  Incidence  of  adrenal
cortical   tumors  In  female  rats,  OPP estimated  "virtually  safe"  exposures.
OlOlh                               -19-                             07/15/87

-------
































1
*0
uw
MlJ
CO
<
)M»











































1
^
*•*
•V
I.
*0
&
Ui.
o
a*
**

M
O

_
?
o

Ol
**
0
Ifc.
VI
41
k.
e
U
01

VI
1
U

















41
e
41
01
41



V)
CJ




Ol
»
oc






«*
Ol
w










•o
>
ac
« '
£ %

e -x
11
z """

4i
VI — «
O >i
Exposure/D
(•g/kg/da


X
Ol

e
"^
k.
V)

VI
U
Ol
^^

co


CP
a. en

CO •»

^ ^

• «M
^




^» ^


O

J;
§ =
*» Ol
A
i «
01 3
VI
oi o
— A
VI
Ol 'O
e oi
-" U
»•» 3
O -D
£ Ol
u ac


«• i-
» en

A
en on


u
5" e> "it <«
•O ik vi — T)
**« '>.
<|$« |<
vi *v e en
» >» k. O 
r> iq Oi • i P—
e-o > « •
d«,So 2S


5 K


i
o>
e
u
< o
X A
e Ob
J^ ^
ac X



Wl
01

i

CO

en
CM




r-


u
I

e
01

o>
$
•o
o
at
m

01 £
W k*
3 k.
oi 2
ac -o


„.
en



*

u
01 1
•- TS
ll
1 CM
id















en
ex

i

n

e
CM




^»

—
o>
t
^
e
a

£
Ol
s
•g


T» VI
Ol k.
sp
•o oi
01 k.
at -M


v
CM


e
^

u
X
•e

||
CD —


K



^

^J
 e
e u — fl
— 4) iq oi
<* c S
o> •—
U Ifl Q.
Ol "» >
SS 2S
•O — oi Oi

*o •
9 >* Oi vi
Ol £ k. k.
u O. a
3 O — i
•9 k. CM Ol
Ol ^^ kV k.
ac if —~*


en ^>
« n


en e
S 5

'S 'Z
>« ^
'! '1
&l^ &U*I
SCM' o~
•— en »•


i






ac
VI
ac

























_
VI VI k.
k. k, O
O O «<
HI

«rt 
tt 
»|| 5
^i
O X >4jQ

•o
X T9 T> 41
~22 1
J> > o
e e k.
fa* k Gk
c a. a.
3^.2
J'-j— « ^
Ol U U — S

e 'a.'a.3"5
S 0.0. "S
II8"
•- 9 9 k. Ol
2k. U Ik. £
tk U. «rf
"c -o -ol» f
n oi oi ~* 3
^^ 48 9 flt ^*
X ^ •" ** VI
«* ** VI «* -
.M CM
x, to wicn x»
f» eno oi
... VI
— O O O 3

VI M
O «"
*< k, u en

5 jl j e
» i
o i a»

^2 g
»- 41
fc| i
e oi
iq
01
U
e
o

e
2
«rf
s
JC
e
01
^0
k.
o>

VI
01
e
o
JS
u
VI
3
Ol
O
gg
O
C
O
^
1
O
u

c


1
fm
Sk
(X
•a
o
C£
§
k.
O
u

>. 3
«7 >k
ue,
3 e
e

ubchrontc, at
dent on durat
vi e
«
vi 41
3'
28
5-
2 ^
*l

(31 ^~
a F-
*" i^
*C 4(
































V
U

•

^
0
T3
e
VI
k>

kfl
O
«9
VI
k.
e
u
•0

e
o
VI
k.
41
e
a
u
•o
e
o

e
VI
3
•0
3
U
f™

u

0)
VI
u














































1
I
4*
0
e

u
ac
oT
u
"a.
CL

^^
O
11
at
OIQlh
-20-
07/17/87

-------
Applying the linear extrapolation model,  the  dose  corresponding to a risk of
10~5  Is almost  an  order  of  magnitude  smaller  than  the  RfDSQ and  RfOQ
value  presented  1n this  document.   The  less conservative  log-problt  model
estimates a  dose  corresponding to a risk  of  10"5  that 1s  of  the  same  order
of  magnitude  as  the  RfDSQ   and   RfDQ   value.    The  U.S.  EPA  uses  the
multistage,   model   of   Crump   (U.S.   EPA,   1980)   to  estimate   risk  for
carcinogens.   At   low  risk  levels,  this  model  usually  results   In  values
closer  to  the linear  model  (Park  and Snee,  1983).   Therefore,  If  adrenal
adenomas and carcinomas  1n  rats  are a biologically  significant tumorlgenlc
response   to  parathlon   exposure,    the   RfDSQ/RfDQ   value   of   6.4xlO~3
mg/kg/day may not  be protective  from the  carcinogenic potential of parathlon
at the risk  level  of 10"5.
6.3.2.   Inhalation.    Data  regarding  the  carcinogenic  potential  of  para-
thlon  following  Inhalation exposure could not be  located  In  the available
literature;  therefore,  an Inhalation q * cannot be calculated.
OlOlh                               -21-                             07/15/87

-------
                                7.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Government  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).    1986.
Documentation of the Threshold L1mH Values and  Biological  Exposure  Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati.  OH.   p.  458.

Baeza, C., A. Goldberg and  R.J.  Rubin.  1972.    Effect of carbon  monoxide  on
response to parathlon and paraoxon.   Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   22(2):  288.

Barnes, J.M.  and  F.A. Denz.   1951.   The  chronic  toxldty  of  p-n1trophenyl
dlethyl thlophosphate (E:605):  A long-term feeding  experiment with  rats.   J.
Hyg.  49:  430-441.

Bartsch,  H., C.  Malavellle,  A.M.   Camus,  et   al.   1980.    Validation  and
comparltlve  studies  on   180  chemicals  with S.   typh.1mu.r1um  strains  and  V79
Chinese  hamster cells   In  the  presence  of  various  metabolizing  systems.
Mutat. Res.  76: 1-50.

Benke,  G,M.  and S.O. Murphy.   1975.   Influence of  age  on  the toxldty  and
metabolism  of  methyl  parathlon  and  parathlon  In male  and  female  rats.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  31:  254-269.

Black,  W.D.,  R.B.  Talbot and  A.E.  Wade.  1975.  A study  of  the effect  of
ovex  on parathlon and paraoxon toxldty In rats.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
33(3): 393-400.
OlOlh                               -22-                             02/04/87

-------
Boyd, E.M.   1969.   Dietary protein and  pesticide  toxldty 1n male  weanling
rats.  Bull. WHO.  40(5):  801-805.

Braeckman, R.A., F. Audenaert,  J.L. Williams,  P.M.  Belpalre and M.G.  Bogaert.
1983.  Tox1cok1net1cs  of  methyl  parathlon and  parathlon  In  the dog  after
Intravenous and oral administration.  Arch. Toxlcol.   54(1): 71-82.

Bulusu,   S.  and  I.  Chakravarty.    1986.   Subacute  administration of  organo-
phosphorus  pesticides   and   hepatic  drug  metabolizing  enzyme  activity  In
normal and malnourished rats.  Bull. Environ.  Contam.  Toxlcol.  36(1):  73-80.

Casterllne,  J.L.,   Jr.  and  C.H.  Williams.    1971.   The   effect  of  28-day
pesticide feeding on serum and tissue  enzyme  activities  of  rats  fed  diets  of
varying casein content. Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   18:  607-618.

Chadwlck, R.W.,  M.F.  Copeland,  R.   FroehUch,  N.  Cooke and D.A.  WhHehouse.
1984.   Interaction between  ^-nexachlorocyclohexane  and  the  gastrointesti-
nal  mlcroflora  and  their  effect  on  the  absorption  blotransformatlon, and
excretion of parathlon by  the rat.   NTIS/PB84-246438.   8 p.

Cohen, B.,  E.  Rlchter, E.   Welsenberg,  J. Schoenberg  and  M.  Lurla.   1977.
Sources   of  parathlon   exposure  for   Israeli  aerial  spray  workers,  1977.
Pestle.  MonH. J.  13:  81-86.

Oegraeve, N., J. Gllot-Oelhalle,  J. Moutschen, et al.  1980.  Comparison  of
the mutagenlc activity  of  organophosphorus Insecticides 1n mouse and  1n the
yeast Schlzosarcharomyces  pombe (Abstract No.  65).   Mutat. Res.   74:  201-202.


OlOlh                               -23-                             07/15/87

-------
Oeskln,  R.,  L.  Rosensteln,  N.  Rogers  and  B.  Westbrook.   1979.   Parathlon
toxlclty In perinatal  rats  exposed  In  utero.   Toxlcol.  Lett.   3(1):  11-14.

DlkshHh, T.S.S.,  S.K.  Tandon,  K.K.  Datta, P.K.  Gupta and  3.R. Beharl.  1978.
Comparative response of male rats  to parathlon and  Undane: Hlstopathologlcal
and biochemical  studies.  Environ.  Res.   17(1):  1-9.

Durham, W.F., H.R.  Wolfe and  3.W.  Elliott.   1972.   Absorption and  excretion
of parathlon by  spraymen.   Arch.  Environ.  Health.   24(6):  381-387.

Edson, E.F. and D.N. Noakes.  1960.  The comparative toxlclty of  six  organo-
phosphorus Insecticides In  the  rat.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.  2:  523-539.

Edson,  E.F.,  et  al.    1964.   Summaries  of  toxlcologlcal  data:  No   effect
levels of three organophosphates In rat, pig  and man.   Food Cosmet. Toxlcol.
2: 311-316.

Fahrlg,  R.   1974.  Comparative  mutagenlcHy  studies  with  pesticides,  in:
Chemical Cardnogenesls Essays.   IARC  Sc1. Pub!.  10: 161-181.

Felsot, A. and P.A. Oahm.   1979.  Sorptlon of  organophosphorus and  carbamate
Insecticides by  soil.   3,  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   27:  557-563.

Frawley,  3.P.  and  H.3.  Fuyat.    1957.   Effect  of low  dietary  levels  of
parathlon and systov on blood  chollnesterase  of dogs.   3. Agrlc.  Food Chem.
5: 346.
OlOlh                               -24-                             07/15/87

-------
Hansch, C. and  A.J.  Leo.   1985.   MedChem Project  Issue  #26.  Pomona  College,
Claremont, CA.  CAS #56-38-2.

Hart, L.G. and  J.R. Fouts.   1963.   Effects  of  acute  and  chronic DDT  adminis-
tration on hepatic mlcrosomal drug  metabolism  In  the rat.   Proc.  Soc.  Exper.
B1ol. Med.  114: 388-392.

Hassan, A.  and  C. Cueto,  Jr.   1970.  Biochemical effects  In  the rabbit  of
repeated  administration  of  a  mixture  of  DDT,  carbaryl,  and  parathlon.
Zeltschrlft fuer Naturforschung,  Band 25b Heft  5.   p. 521-525.

Hazelton,   L.W.  and  E.G.   Holland.   1950.   Pharmacology  and  toxicology  of
parathlon.  Adv. Chem.  Ser.  1:  31-38.   (Cited  In  IARC, 1983)

Homann,  J.,  S.  Schneider  and   K.J.   Matthes.    1985.    Parathlon-provoked
lethality   In  rats  Is  reduced  by   dlethyldlthlocarbamate.   Arch.  Toxlcol.
57(2): 144-145.

IARC  (International Agency for  Research  on Cancer).   1983.   IARC  Monographs
on the Evaluation  of  the  Carcinogenic  Risk of Chemicals  to Man.   Phosphoro-
thlolc acid,  0,0-d1ethyl 0-(4-n1trophenyl)  ester.  WHO,  IARC, Lyons,  France.
Vol. 30,  p. 153.

Jones, D.C.L., V.F. Simmon,  K.E. Mortelman, et al.   1982.   In vitro  mutaqen-
Iclty  studies of  environmental  chemicals.   National Technical  Information
Service,  Washington,  DC.  (Cited  In  IARC, 1983)
OlOlh                               -25-                             07/15/87

-------
Kawal,  N.,  S.  Iwahara,  Y.  Sasaki,  T.  Mlkaml,  I.  Watanabe  and  Y.  Ochlal.
1973.   Pesticide  Interactions.   Boe1   Elsel  (Nat.  Def.  Med.  J.)   20(12):
509-512

Kay, K., L. Monkman, J.P. Wlndlsh,  T. Donerty,  3.  Pare  and C.  Raclcot.   1952.
Parathlon  exposure  and  chollnesterase  response  of  Quebec  apple  growers.
Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup.  Med.   6:  252-262.  (CUed  In NIOSH, 1976)

KepHnger, M.L. and H.8. Oelchmann.  1967.   Acute toxldty of combinations
of pesticides.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   10(3):  586-595.

Lyman,  W.J.,  H.F.  Reehl  and  D.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical
Property Estimation  Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book  Co.,  New York.   p.  5-5.

Lynch, W.T. and J.M. Coon.  1972.  Effect of  tM-o-tolyl phosphate  pretreat-
ment  on  the  toxlclty and  metabolism  of parathlon  and  paraoxon  In  mice.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  21(2):  153-165.

Malbach,  H.I.,  R.I. Feldman,  T.H.  M1lby  and  W.F. Serat.   1971.   Regional
variation  1n  percutaneous   penetration  In   man.   Arch.   Environ.   Health.
23(9): 208-211.

Maronpot,  R.R.,  H.P.   Hltschl.  L.H.  Smith  and  J.I.   McCoy.   1983.   Recent
experience with the Strain A mouse pulmonary tumor  bloassay model.   Environ.
Scl. Res.  27: 341-349.
OlOlh                               -26-                             07/17/87

-------
Mirer,  F.E.,  B.S.  Levlne  and  S.O.  Murphy.   1977.   Parathlon  and methyl
parathlon toxldty  and  metabolism In plperonyl butoxlde and dlethyl maleate
pretreated mice.  Chem.  B1ol.  Interact.   17(1): 99-112.

Moeller,  H.C.   and  J.A.  Rider.   1961.   Studies  on  the  antlchollnesterase
effect of parathlon and  methyl parathlon 1n humans.  Fed.  Proc.   20:  434.

Mohn, G.  1973.   5-Methyltryptophan  resistance  mutations  In  EscheMchla col"1
K-12.   Mutagenlc  activity  of  monofunctlonal  alkylatlng  agents  Including
organophosphorus Insecticides.  Mutat.  Res.  20(1): 7-15.

Morgan, O.P., H.L.  Hetzler, E.F.  Slach  and L.I. L1u.  1977.  Urinary excre-
tion  of  paranltrophenol  and  alkyl  phosphates  following  1ngest1on of methyl
or ethyl parathlon by human  subjects.  Arch.  Environ.  Health.  6:  159-173.

Murphy, S.D.  1980.   Toxic  Interactions with dermal exposure to  organophos-
phate Insecticides.  Dev.  Toxlcol. Environ. Scl.  8:  615-621.

NAS  (National   Academy  of  Sciences).    1977.    Drinking  Water  and Health.
National Research Council, Washington,  OC.

NCI  (National Cancer  Institute).   1979.  Bloassay of parathlon  for  possible
carc1nogen1c1ty.   NCI-C6-7R-70.   [Also  Published  as  OHEW  (NIH)  Publ.  No.
79-1320]

Neskovlc, N.K.   1979.   Effects   of  subacute  feeding  of  carbaryl  on  mixed
function  oxldase  and on  acute  toxUHy of  parathlon  and propoxur  In raU.
Environ. Res.  20(1): 148-153.

OlOlh                               -27-                             07/15/87

-------
Newell,  G.W.  and J.V.  Ollley.   1978.   Teratology  and  acute  toxicology  of
selected  chemical  pesticides administered  by  Inhalation.   NTIS  PB-277077.
62 p.

Nledner,  R.   and U.   von  Oettlngen.   1976.   Influence  of  herbicides   on
parathlon toxldty.   Naunyn Schmledebergs  Arch.  Pharmacol.   p.  294.

NIOSH  (National  Institute  for  Occupational   Safety  and   Health).    1976.
Criteria  for  a  recommended  standard...Occupational  exposure  to  parathlon,
U.S.  DHEW,  PHS, Cen.  B1s. Contr.  Cincinnati,  OH.    DHEW  Pub!.  No.  (NIOSH)
76-190.

Nlshlo,  A. and  E.M.  Uyekl.  1981.   Induction  of sister chromatld  exchanges
1n  Chinese  hamster   ovary  cells  by organophosphate  Insecticides  and  their
oxygen analogs.   3.  Toxlcol.  Environ. Health.   8(5-6): 939-945.

Omlrov,  R.Y.  and A.Y.  Aberkulov.   1972.   Changes  In ID,,  of parathlon  and
heptachlor following turpentine  pretreatment.   Med.  ZH UZB.   1: 50-51.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety  and  Health  Administration).  1985,,   Safety  and
Health Standards.  Code of  Federal  Regulations.   29  CFR 1910.1000.

Park,  C.N.  and  R.O.  Snee.   1983.   Quantitative risk  assessment.   State-of-
the-art  for carclnogenesls.  Fund.  Appl.  Toxlcol.  3:  320-333.

Rider, J.A., H.C. Moeller, E.J. Pulettl and  J.I.  Swader.   1969.   Toxldty of
parathlon, Systox, octamethyl pyrophosphoramlde  and methyl  parothlon  In man.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  14(3):  603-611.

OlOlh                               -28-                              07/15/87

-------
Robinson,  C.P.,  P.M.  Smith,  J.K.   McConnell   and  B.R.   Endecott.    1976.
Comparison of protective effects of  ethylestrenol,  norbolethone  and  splrono-
lactone  against  lethality  from acute  doses of  parathlon  and  paraoxon  In
female rats.   J. Pharmacol.  Sc1.  65(4):  595-596.

Sanborn,  J.R.,  B.M.  Francis  and R.L.  Metcalf.   1977.   The degradation  of
selected  pesticides  In  soil.    A  review  of   published   literature.    EPA
600/9-77-022.  U.S. EPA, Cincinnati,  OH.   p.  616.

Scheln,  L.G.  and  J.A.  Thomas.   1975.   Parathlon-dleldrln  Interactions  on
androgen metabolism In the mouse.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   33(1):  157.

Sharon, M.S., J.R.W. Miles, C.R. Harris  and  F.L.  McEwen.   1984.   Behavior of
12 Insecticides 1n  soil and aqueous  suspensions of  soil  and  sediment.   Water
Res.   14: 1095-1100.

Simmon,  V.F.,   A.D.  Mitchell   and   T.A.   Jorgenson.   1977.   Evaluation  of
selected  pesticides  and chemical mutagens.   In, vitro  and ^n vivo  studies.
U.S.  EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.  EPA 600/1-77-028.

Simpson,  G.R.   and  A.  Beck.    1965.    Exposure  to  parathlon:   Dermal  and
Inhalation  exposure  to  parathlon  while  spraying  tomato   bushes   with  a
knapsack mister.  Arch.  Environ. Health.   11(12):  784-786.

SMvastava,  S.P.,  O.K.  Agarwal,  M.  Mushtaq  and  P.K.  Seth.  1976.   Inter-
action of  dl-2-ethylhexyl  phathalate (DEHP)  with parathlon  In rats.   Chemo-
sphere.  5(3):  177-181.


OlOlh                               -29-                             07/15/87

-------
Townsend, 8.A.  and  G.P.  Carlson.  1981.   Effect  of halogenated benzenes  on
the  toxldty  and metabolism of  malathlon,  malaoxon,  parathlon and  paraoxon
1n mice.  Toxlcol. Appl,  Pharmacol.   60(1):  52-61.

TMolo,  J.M. and  A.J.  Coon.   1966.   The protective effect of  aldrln against
the  toxldty  of  organophosphate antlchollnesterases.   J.  Pharmacol.  Exp.
Ther.  154(3): 613-623.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology Used  In the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment  Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Hater  Criteria
Documents.  Federal  Register.   45(231): 49347-49357.

U.S. EPA.   1983.  Parathlon or  Its  methyl homolog; tolerances  for  residues.
40 CFR 180.121.

U.S. EPA.   1984a.  Methodology and Guidelines  for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations Based  on  Chronic Toxldty  Data.   Prepared by the Office  of Health
and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment Office,
Cincinnati,   OH   for   the  Office  of  Solid  Waste  and  Emergency   Response,
Washington,  DC.

U.S. EPA.   1984b.   Reportable  Quantity Document for Parathlon.  Prepared  by
the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment   Office,  Cincinnati,  OH  for  the   Office  of  Emergency  and
Remedial Response, Washington,  DC.
OlOln                               -30-                             07/15/87

-------
U.S. EPA.  1986a.  Reference Doses  (RfOs)  for  Oral  Exposure.   Parathlon  CAS#
56-38-2.   Prepared  by  the Office  of Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S. EPA.   1986b.   CBI  Appendix  to Review and  Evaluation  of ADI  for  Para-
thlon.    First  Draft.   Contract No.  68-03-3228.   Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.    Guidelines  for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S. EPA.   I986d.   Integrated Risk  Information  System  (IRIS).   Reference
Dose  (RfD)  for  Oral  Exposure  for  Parathlon.   Online  (verification  date
11/25/86).   Office  of  Health  and  Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH.

Valencia,  R.   1977.   Mutagenesls  screening  of pesticides  using DrosophHa.
Contract No. 68-01-2474.  HARF  Institutes, Inc.,, Madison HI.

Vllleneuve,  O.C., M.J.  von Logan,   E.M.  den  Tonkelaar, A.G.  Rauws,  R.  Kroes
and  G.J.  van  Esch.    1978.    The  combined effect  of  food  restriction  and
parathlon exposure 1n rats.  Arch.  Environ. Contam.  Toxlcol.  7:  37-45.

Vukovlch,  R.A.,  A.J.  TMolo  and  J.M. Coon.  1971.  Effect  of chlorpromazlne
on  the  toxldty  and  blotransformatlon of  parathlon In mice.  J.  Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther.  178(2):  395-401.
OlOlh                               -31-                             07/15/87

-------
Waters, M.D.,  S.S.  Sandhu, V.F.  Simmon,  et al.   1982.   Study on pesticide
genotoxldty.   In.:  Genetic  Toxicology  --  An  Agricultural  Perspective,  R.
Fleck and A. Hollaender,  Ed.   Plenum Press,  New York.

Welsburger,  E.K.    1982.   CardnogenlcHy  tests   on  pesticides.   In:  iff.
Chronic Exposures Pestle.  Animal.  Systems,  J.E.  Chambers and  J.D. Varbough,
Ed.  Ravon, New York.   p.  165-176.

Weiss, L.R. and R.A. Orzel.  1967.   Enhancement of toxldty  of  antlchollnes-
terases  by central  depressant  drugs  In  rats.    Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
10(2): 334-339.

Weltman, S.O.,  H.O.  Vodlcnlk  and J.J. Lech.   1983.   Influence of pregnancy
on  parathlon  toxldty and  disposition.   Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   71(2):
215-224.

Wolfe, H.R., W.F. Durham  and  J.F.  Armstrong.   1967.   Exposure  of  workers to
pesticide.   Arch.  Environ. Health.   14(4):  622-633.
OlOlh                               -32-                             07/15/87

-------
                  o
            S    «
                                 0)
                                 u
                                 a>
                                 to
                                 ae.
                                 to

                                 o a
                                 Ol
                                 u u
                                 c o
                                 o>
                                 u co
                                 O >.
                               0> O 01
                               a. Q. e
                               X X —
                                 u
                                 0>
                                              vO
                                              CO
                                                         03
                                                         O1
                          00
                          
                                                                      CO
   •o

   i1
                           II

                           u
   to —
   •*•> .C
   >» C
   u »-
   o
   u  &
                                               w a*
                                               I  0)
                                                 c
                                                            o
to —

>» e
u *-
o
u  0>
              u to
              D —•
                t/i
              I  O)
                C

             LU f~
   vD
   O
   |
                                                         o

                                                         o
                                                         e

                                                         §
                                                                      > f—
                                                                      —  II
                                                                      >  9t

                                                                      3 ae
                                                                      ^ c
                                                                      u «-
                                                                      s e
                                                                      ^3 ^3
                                                                      to 0)
                                                                      W 3
              - c  c   -o
             ** O  O   -V


             ^9 ^9  W   *^s ^O

             S fe -o    !*«
             Q. C  O >i    II
             SL to  u. -o un  -o
                o» ex 3  • a»
             O  i  a; —• >— ae
-s!.
<« ae  o I
w   vh. >
o   —«
                                                         ae o
                                                                    x u
                                                                    ti
OlOlh
    -33-
                                  07/15/87

-------