TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            fftette rttd Instructions on the revtne before completing)
1. REPORT NO.

  EPA/600/8-88/056
                             2.
              I. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO
                  PB88-182886/AS
4 TITLE AND SUBTITLE  .

  Health  Effects  Assessment for  Toxaphene
                                                           6. REPORT DATE
                                                           «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                            I. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of Research  and Development  •
 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
 Cincinnati. OH  45268	
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                EPA/600/22
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
   This report  summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to a preliminary interim
 assessment of  adverse health effects associated with specific chemicals  or compounds.
 The Office of  Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses these  documents in
 preparing cost-benefit analyses under Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under
 CERCLA.  All estimates of acceptable intakes  and carcinogenic potency presented in
 this document  should be considered as preliminary and reflect limited resources
 allocated to this  project.  The intent  in  these assessments is to suggest acceptable
 exposure levels  whenever sufficient data are  available.  The interim  values presented
 reflect the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure or risk to the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible,  two categories of values have been
 estimated for  systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not the  endpoint of
 concern).  The first, RfD$ or subchronic reference dose, is an estimate  of an exposure
 level that would not be expected to cause  adverse effects when exposure  occurs during
 a limited time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level  that would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects when  exposure occurs for a significant portion
 of the lifespan.   For compounds for which  there is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity, qj*s have been computed,  if  appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation data  if available.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)

  Unclassified	
                                                                         21. NO. Of PAGES
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page/
                                                Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA F»tm 2220-1 (R«r. 4-77)
                              COITION is O«»OLCTC

-------
                                            EPA/600/8-88/056
                                            June, 1987
          HEALTH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT
                FOR TOXAPHENE
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            CINCINNATI, OH 45268

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


    This   document   has   been  reviewed   1n  accordance   with   the   U.S.
Environmental  Protection  Agency's  peer  and  administrative  review policies
and approved for publication.  Mention of  trade  names  or  commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                    PREFACE
    This report  summarizes  and  evaluates Information relevant  to  a  prelimi-
nary Interim assessment of  adverse  health  effects  associated  with  toxaphene.
All  estimates  of acceptable  Intakes and 'carcinogenic  potency  presented  In
this document  should be  considered  as   preliminary  and  reflect limited  re-
sources allocated to this project.  Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and environmental
data were located through on-Hne  literature  searches of  the  TOXLINE  and  the
CHEMFATE/DATALQG data bases.  The basic literature  searched  supporting  this
document 1s current  up  to May,  1986.  Secondary sources  of Information  have
also been relied upon In  the  preparation of  this  report  and represent large-
scale  health   assessment   efforts   that  entail  extensive  peer  and  Agency
review.  The  following  Office of Health and  Environmental  Assessment (OHEA)
sources have been extensively utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.    1980a.    Ambient  Water   Quality Criteria   Document  for
    Toxaphene.   Prepared   by  the  Office  of Health  and  Environmental
    Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria   and  Assessment  Office,  Cincin-
    nati, OH  for  the Office  of  Water  Regulations  and Standards,  Wash-
    ington, DC.  EPA 440/5-80-076.  NTIS PB81-117863.

    U.S. EPA.   1986b.   Evaluation  of  the  Potential  Carc1nogen1c1ty  of
    Toxaphene.  Prepared  by  the  Office of  Health  and  Environmental
    Assessment,  Carcinogen Assessment   Group,  Washington,  DC  for  the
    Office of  Solid  Waste and Emergency  Response,  Washington,  DC.

    The Intent 1n these assessments  Is  to  suggest  acceptable  exposure levels
for  noncarclnogens  and   risk   cancer   potency  estimates   for  carcinogens
whenever sufficient  data  were available-.  Values  were not  derived  or larger
uncertainty factors  were  employed  when the  variable data were  limited  In
scope   tending   to   generate  conservative   (I.e.,   protective)  estimates.
Nevertheless,   the  Interim  values  presented   reflect  the  relative degree  of
hazard or risk associated with exposure  to  the chemlcal(s) addressed.

    Whenever  possible,  two  categories   of   values  have  been  estimated  for
systemic  toxicants   (toxicants   for  which  cancer   1s not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first,  RfD$ (formerly AIS) or subchronlc reference  dose,  1s
an estimate of an exposure  level  that would  not be expected to cause adverse
effects  when  exposure  occurs during a   limited  time Interval  (I.e.,  for  an
Interval that  does   not  constitute a significant  portion  of  the  llfespan).
This type  of  exposure  estimate  has  not  been  extensively  used, or  rigorously
defined, as  previous risk  assessment efforts  have been primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants  1n  ambient  air  or water   where  lifetime
exposure   1s   assumed.    Animal   data   used   for   RFD$   estimates   generally
Include  exposures with  durations of  30-90  days.   Subchronlc  human  data  are
rarely  available.   Reported exposures are usually  from  chronic occupational
exposure  situations  or  from reports  of acute accidental  exposure.   These
values   are   developed    for  both   Inhalation   (RfD$j)   and   oral   (RfD$o)
exposures.
                                      111

-------
    The  RfO  (formerly  AIC)  1s  similar  In  concept  and  addresses  chronic
exposure.   It 1s an  estimate  of an  exposure level  that would not be expected
to cause  adverse  effects when  exposure  occurs for  a  significant  portion of
the  llfespan  [see  U.S.  EPA  (1980b)  for  a  discussion  of  this  concept].   The
RfO  1s  route-specific  and  estimates acceptable  exposure  for either  oral
(RfD(j)  or  Inhalation   (RfDj)   with  the  Implicit  assumption   that  exposure
by other routes 1s Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncardnogens  have  also  been  calculated
where  data permitted.   These  values are  used  for  Identifying  reportable
quantities  and  the methodology  for  their  development  1s  explained  1n  U.S.
EPA (1983).

    For compounds  for  which there 1s  sufficient evidence  of cardnogenlclty
RfD$  and  RfD  values are  not derived.   For a discussion  of  risk  assessment
methodology for  carcinogens refer  to U.S.  EPA  (1980b).   Since cancer  1s  a
process that  Is  not characterized by  a  threshold,  any  exposure contributes
an Increment  of  risk.   For  carcinogens,  q-|*s have  been computed,  1f appro-
priate, based on oral and Inhalation data If available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place the  risk assessment  evaluation  1n  proper  context,
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this  series  as  well   as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of  the quantitative estimates presented.

    The data  base  for toxaphene  contained  studies  1n  rats  and mice  that
Indicated  that  toxaphene  was  carcinogenic,  causing  thyroid  tumors  1n  rats
and  liver  tumors  In  mice.   Using  data  for combined Incidences  of  hepato-
cellular adenomas  and carcinomas  In  male B6C3F1  mice from the  Litton  B1o-
netlcs. Inc.  (1978) study,  U.S.  EPA (1980a)  calculated a  human  carcinogenic
potency factor of 1.131 (mg/kg/day)'1.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under  Contract No.  68-03-3112  for  EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Dr.  Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn  were  the  Technical   Project  Monitors  and  John  Helms  (Office  of
Toxic  Substances)  was  the Project  Officer.   The  final  documents   In  this
series  were  prepared  for  the  Office  of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,
Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the  following U.S. EPA  offices provided  review  comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment  Group
         Office of Air Quality  Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series was provided  by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH

Technical  support   services  for  the  document   series  was  provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Jacky Bohanon and K1m Davidson
    Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office
    Cincinnati,  OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.
2.


3.








ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1.
2.2.
ORAL 	
INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1.


3.2.


SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
Page
. . . 1
. , , 4
. . . 4
. . . 4
. . . 5
... 5.'
. . . 5
, , 7
, , , 7
. . . 7
. . . 9


3.4.
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
TOXICANT INTERACTIONS. 	 . .
4. CARCINOGENICITY 	 	 	 . .
4.1.


4.2.


4.3.
4.4.
HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
5. REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
-J 	 1C
	 12
	 13
	 13
....... 15
. . 	 	 15
	 15
	 15
	 15
	 15
	 17
	 17
	 18
	 19
        V11

-------
                               TABLE  OF  CONTENTS

                                                                        Page

 6.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   23

     6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfOs) 	   23
     6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)	   23
     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q-|*)	   23

            6.3.1.   Oral	   23
            6.3.2.   Inhalation	   23

 7.  REFERENCES	   25-

APPENDIX: Summary Table for Oral Toxldty of Toxaphene Using Male
          B6C3F1  Mice	   35

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES

No.                               TUIe                                Page

1-1     Selected Chemical and Physical Properties and Half-lives
        for Toxaphene	    2

3-1     Subchronlc Oral  Toxlclty of Toxaphene 	    6

3-2     Chronic Toxlclty of Toxaphene to Laboratory Mammals at
        Low Oral Levels	    8

3-3     Chronic Toxlclty of Dietary Toxaphene In B6C3F1 Mice and
        Osborne-Mendel Rats	   10-

5-1     Tolerances for Toxaphene Residues 1n Various Agricultural
        Products	   21

5-2     Guideline Levels for Toxaphene In Foods  	   22

6-1     Cancer Data Sheet for Derivation of q-|*	   24
                                      1x

-------
                             LIST  OF  ABBREVIATIONS

CBI                     Confidential  business Information
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
EEG                     Electroencephalogram
HA                      Health advisory
MFO                     Mixed function oxldase
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
ppm                     Parts per million
RfD                     Reference dose
RfOj                    Inhalation reference dose
RfDg                    Oral reference dose
RfD$                    Subchronlc reference dose
RfO$I                   Subchronlc Inhalation reference dose
RfD-so                   Subchronlc oral reference dose
TWA                     Time-weighted average

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    Selected  chemical   and  physical  properties  and environmental  fate  of
toxaphene are presented In Table 1-1.
    Determination of the fate of toxaphene  1n  the  environment  1s  complicated
because   toxaphene   1s  a  complex   mixture  of   polychlorlnated   camphene
derivatives  with  different physical  properties  and environmental  behavior
(Callahan et al., 1979).  The half-life of  toxaphene 1n  the  atmosphere could
not be  located In  the available literature.   Data from monitoring  studies
clearly  suggest  that  toxaphene 1s  a prevalent  atmospheric contaminant  1n
areas   where this  pesticide  1s  used, particularly 1n  the  southern  United
States  (U.S.  EPA,  1980a).   Toxaphene  has  been  detected   In  rainfall  and
levels  of  this  compound  In  rainfall  have been   found  to  increase  during
months of  Increased usage of the  chemical  (HSOB,  1986).  Toxaphene  1s very
stable to biological and chemical processess In  aerobic  systems,  although It
does  undergo partial   reduction  (loss  of  chlorine)  In aerobic  environments.
In  water,  a dominant  fate  process  Is  direct  sorptlon onto  sediments  or
sorptlon  onto  partlculates   followed by   deposition  Into  sediments  where
biological  and possibly  chemical   reduction  occurs  under   anaerobic  condi-
tions.   The tendency   of  toxaphene  to bind  to sediments usually  results  1n
Its rapid removal   from  the  water  column.   The  rate of  toxaphene  loss from
water will  then  be partially determined by partlculate  loading  and  quality
of  the  body  of  water;  shallow,   partlculate-laden  eutrophU  waters  give
maximum  transformation rates of  toxaphene,  with  half-lives  on  the order of a
few  months  for  some  components.   The  physical  properties  and  chlorinated
functionality  of  the  Individual   toxaphene   structures  win  govern  which
components will be  sorbed and subsequently  reduced.


OlOOh                               -1-                              06/01/87

-------
                                   TABLE  1-1

    Selected Chemical and Physical Properties and Half-lives for Toxaphene
        Property
           Value
   Reference
CAS number:

Chemical class:

Molecular weight:

Vapor pressure at 25°C:


Water solubility at 25°C:
Log octanol/water
  partition coefficient:

Bloconcentratlon factor:
Soil adsorption
  coefficient:

Half-lives In
  A1r:
  Hater:

  Soil:
8001-35-2

Polychlorlnated dHerpenes

414 (average)

0.2-0.4 mm Hg


0.4 to -3 mg/l


3.3*0.4
3400-10,000 brook trout
(Salvellnus fontlnalls)
52,000 fathead minnow
(Plmephales promelas)
7800-40,000 channel catfish
(Ictalurus punctatus)
9800 sheepshead minnow
(Cyprlnodon varleqatus)

2400-7200 (estimated)
NA
a few months

4 months to 16 years
IARC, 1979

Callahan
et al., 1979

Callahan
et al., 1979

Callahan
et al., 1979

U.S. EPA, 1980a
Lyman et al.,
1982
Callahan
et al., 1979
Sanborn
et al., 1977
NA = Not available
OlOOh
       -2-
       10/21/86

-------
    The  high bloconcentratlon  factors  1n  aquatic  organisms   Indicate  that
bloaccumulatlon 1n  aquatic  food chains will  occur  (Callahan et  al.,  1979).
In  soil,  toxaphene 1s  expected to be  Immobile.   Widely varying  values  for
the  half-life  of  toxaphene  In  soil  have been  reported In the  literature.
Values  range from a  half-life  of 120 days  for  toxaphene applied  to  Dunbar
soil  In  a  South Carolina field plot  to  16  years  for 51%  loss  of  toxaphene
applied  to  Congaree  sandy  loam.  Toxaphene  1n groundwater  Is  reported  to
persist for at least 1 year  (Sanborn et al.,  1977).
OlOOh                               -3-                              10/21/86

-------
           2.   ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL  ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Quantitative  data  regarding  the  oral  absorption  of  toxaphene  were
provided  by Ohsawa  et  al.  (1975),  who  administered  single  oral  doses  of
3SCl-toxaphene  (H.2  mg/kg)  or  14C-toxaphene  (8.5-19.0  mg/kg)  to  rats
and  measured   the  radioactivity  excreted  1n  the  urine  and  feces  over  the
subsequent  14  days.   Ohsawa  et  al.  (1975)  reported  that 49-56% of the radio-
activity  associated   with  an oral  dose  of  3«Cl-toxaphene  was  excreted  In
the  urine and  -27%  In  feces of rats  within  14 days.   Following treatment
with  14C-toxaphene,  fecal excretion  accounted for  -32%  of  the administered
dose of radioactivity.   These data  Indicate  that absorption  of toxaphene was
>68%.  U.S.  EPA (1980a)  noted  that  cases  of  human  poisoning  Indicate  that
humans absorb  toxic  doses following oral exposure.   At  least  13 deaths  from
toxaphene  poisoning  have  been  recorded  (Hayes,  1975).   Most  of  the  fatal
cases Involved  Ingestlon of toxaphene by small  children.
2.2.   INHALATION
    U.S.   EPA  (1980a)  stated  that  Inhalation exposure  to  toxaphene probably
does  not  result  In  sufficient   absorption  by   humans to  cause  quantifiable
levels 1n  the  blood.   A study by U.S.  EPA  (1978)  found no detectable levels
of toxaphene In the  blood  of  54 workers occupatlonally exposed to toxaphene;
however,  no quantitative estimates of absorption were provided.
OlOOh                               -4-                              06/01/87

-------
                3.   TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   The   available    Information   concerning  subchronlc   oral
toxlclty  of  toxaphene  Is  summarized 1n  Table 3-1.   Generally,  effects  on
biochemical parameters  (Baeumler,  1975;  Grebenyuk,  1970),  hlstopathologlcal
appearance of the liver (Ortega et al.,  1957;  Lackey,  1949,  Sosnlerz et al.,
1972), hormone  synthesis  (Mohammed  et  al.,  1985)  and  survival  (NCI,  1979)
have been reported.
    Ortega et al. (1957)  fed groups  of six male  and six  female Sherman rats
diets containing 50 or 200  ppm  toxaphene  for  2-9 months.  They  found  dose-
related hlstologlcal  changes  1n  the liver (hydropic accumulation);  however,
no controls were examined  for this  effect.
    Allen  et  al.  (1983) fed  130  female  Swiss-Webster  mice diets  containing
10,  100  or 200  ppm  toxaphene  for  8 weeks.   Humoral antibody  production was
suppressed 1n mice  at 100  and 200 ppm.
    NCI  (1979)  fed  groups  of five male  and  five  female  Osborne-Mendel rats
and  86C3F1 mice diets containing  160-5120 ppm (rats)  or 40-1280  ppm (mice)
toxaphene  In  2-fold Increasing  concentrations  for  6 weeks.  Some  rats died
at  2560  ppm, but  no  deaths  or  body  weight   effects  occurred  at  1280 ppm.
Some mice died at >320 ppm.
    The dog  studies  by Lackey (1949) suggested a  threshold  for CNS stimula-
tion.   Dogs   given  a   single  dose  of   5  mg/mg  toxaphene  did not  exhibit
convulsions.   Dogs  given  5 mg/kg/day for  a  few  days  experienced  occasional
convulsions;   however,  dogs  were  able   to  tolerate  large  cumulative  doses
(176-424  mg/kg) when  administered  at  4 mg/kg/day.    Groups  of   two  dogs
receiving  4   mg/kg/day for  44  or  106  days  experienced  changes   In  liver
histology and degener itlon of the renal  tubular epithelium of the kidneys.


OlOOh                                -5-                              06/01/87

-------




































01
e
01
£
Q.
X
0
14.
O
J
u
X
o

^
k.
0
U
e
0
£
u
a
3
(/I









































41
u
c
41
41


oe















41
VI
C
o
VI
01
ac















Ol
VI
o
a





c
o
*•
3
0




41
^—

—
41





O vi
i_ 'm
41 e

E e

z


c

2

V5

41
4>
£"






p«-

*~
.

01
E
3

ea
e
41

O
a.

01
e

3
•o
c


y^
L.
I/I
*i
41
U
O
O

s


I/I
41
O>
e
£





•3
o>a
J< CO
K
U->
O ^J
w» •—
I*
a*
OJ
3 ^

r- •**
i§
Ol 1-
vi 9







Ol

^3







eo

i
>fi

•o
e

o c
e —
*. fQ
J3 U.
fQ I/I
11 -0
x "a


,_
en
f- O
r-

f"
're •
\*
— 3
01 >.
e
Q. Ol
a. js
(Q Ol








U
VI
1

VI u

tj -O
Ol O
14. Q
Ol S
oi e
VI *.
Ol Ol
•o e

c w
Ol >t

2. 2
a. o
1) £3.
O 4l


1

Oi
Z1
OB
I
en CM
eo
•"• p-





*Sj "^
Oi ^
* i
f~ i—







"S
— oe
•o z




CM
P_

•

CM ac








1 1
•1C .1C
ac ac


In
2



r»
*q
o
Ol

Ol

O










>^

O

"o
«0
Q.
I.
>

41
^
fg
C
o

41
3






O
O
w
o
o



VI


e
i
en
Cu







41

•o

41

O
•o
.^



s
^
41
*™

5 |!

^
41 •Q
£ C
^x O>
vi 41
^ — 0
tj 5 o
ee 8 —









en

en


u
z
„
41 Ol-O
•» — 41
U 41 —
01 X U
14- 01
14. e 14.
•H ro 14.
§SZ

e e «
^ L.
g»«*» 4i
u. >

^ O ^

X ~- e
e vi vi
^S
41 —
•o -o >
e u
o
r>j — >n
O f— ffl CM




O
3o
-NO
o u^
oS*
stf CNi
F™ *~





VI
1
\A




41
C
O
41 41
U —
<« •o

41

O
•o
^^
m


5



i
n
e

o

0 —
^ 41
— e
ra 41
ac X
CM

en
fc
•

fQ

"S
en

en u.
•— 41
C
»- VI
Z 

i/i
>i
0)
c
•o


^,
e
*
1>
O >

in »—
CM
«*•
•^ O
nj
1/1 >«
— C ifl
l^ O "9
VI Ol

- 5?
i/i — *£
£ *^

•o u. e
41 01 <«
•o e

i K


-i
f^J «A "X

W^ O J*
o rJf
sA C^
hT) • O
~ °>
o r» -
eo o o
f- O CM





VI I/I
41 ra
1 I



^_

41 0
e
O 01
Ol —

rg O

01
VI
O
'
..



5 2




C k.

0 —

o— 3
— c —
fg Ol "3
oca ac
in
eo
en
m


rg ^ ^
e •
Ol

•o ^ c
41 VI L.
i co
E ^ £

£ Ol •—
0 £ 41
£ c/) O



^

VI
Ol

e
>*
VI
41
C
O

01
0 —
w u
•- 41
** 14.
0 41

14. C
O 13
C —


— c
«- 01
*• VI
C O






i
2 1





VI
VI £
41 C
$ 8
lrf» «4







4» 0)

*5 *3









oc at




*

^

1 *3
— — —
ac ac oi







en
en
en f—

i— 9H
41


CJ fQ
Z _a
, ,.
§ 5
3
CO *3

xg 143

fQ VI
£ LL. 41 0
*- VI
41 . ..»—
XX >. 3
» o> >


ol vi o u

C 41 Q.-0
l» ^
u- > O.

.0
X CM 41 C

iq «*«
vi ^O C »0
£0) O u
wo — 01
<« U — C
41 41 VI 01
<*» 3 01


o"
.
<^ re
"8 5
o2: r
eo V
of 5






VI VI
41 <«
0, T3
^r





Ol »-
c o
0

U O


4»
w«
0

y»



5 CM




(^

<*?

eo z
U Si
X el







0*
o*
f—

>.
«

u

1_
^~
3
3



C C
4^ O
b. ^
g^
>* 3
O» >

^- o
O U

^^
^ I-
> 0.

>
1
?
*




U4
>»
1





^
O

c
o










CM


















o^
ff»


>t
4)


*i

^

i1

o

'AI
01
c
^
01

Ol
i.

1

S

**
C


^
3
>
O

o
i
>t 0*
<
I £
in -—



•o —
c c
-0 0
41 £
U 3


41
e
Ol
^-. v>
•- O
O ^
41
C J£
9 L.
(j Q




41
9

\

cA








ac
X,

o
a

























































•o
*»•
u
4)
a.
VI
4>
VI

"5
<•.

^
O
5 S
00 C
en 3

• 41

O 19
03
en 41
^ c *a

u i_
c o
C/5 41 O.

<^

41 O 0
!_/ *^ Z
1 i "
r? JO1 Z
OTOOh
-6-
10/21/86

-------
3.1.2.   Inhalation.  As  reviewed by  U.S.  EPA  (1985a),   50  volunteers  who
Inhaled  0.4  mg/m3  toxaphene  aerosol   10  minutes/day  for  15  days  had  no
subjective or objective effects, and 25 humans who  Inhaled a  mist containing
250  mg/m3  toxaphene,   30  minutes/day  for  13  days  showed  no toxic  effects
(Shelanskl, 1947; Kepllnger,  1963).
    U.S. EPA  (1985a)  reported that toxaphene  aerosols  In the form  of  dusts
are  more  toxic  than  mists  to  rats.   M1st  concentrations up  to 500  rmj/m3
did  not cause  any mortality  In  rats and  rabbits  over  a  3-week  period;
however, all  rats  exposed to 250 mg/m3 dust  for  1  week died.   Rats,  dogs
and  guinea  pigs  exposed  to  dust at  12  mg/m3  for  3  months  died,  but  no
deaths occurred at 4 mg/m3 (Boots Hercules  Agrochemlcals,  Inc.,  n.d.).
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   The available Information  concerning  long-term  toxldty  of
toxaphene  to   laboratory  animals  1s   summarized  In  Table 3-2.   The  liver
appears  to be  a  target  organ;  most  adverse effects  on  this   organ  were
reported 1n studies that  used dietary  levels >100 ppm (Kennedy  et al.,  1973;
Lehman,  1952;  Boots  Hercules  Agrochemlcals,   Inc.,  n.d.).   Lehman  (1952)
found  fatty  degeneration of  the  liver   1n   rats  fed  100  ppm  toxaphene.
FHzhugh  and   Nelson  (1951)   reported   Increased  liver  weights  and  minimal
liver  cell  enlargement  1n rats  fed 25 ppm  for their lifetime.   This  Is  the
lowest  level   for  which  liver  effects were  reported.   U.S.  EPA  (1985a)
reported  that  unpublished  studies with  rats,  dogs and monkeys by  Boots
Hercules  Agrochemlcals,   Inc.  (n.d.)  were  In  general   agreement with  the
published studies.
    The NCI  (1979)  conducted  chronic   bloassays with  Osborne-Mendel  rats  and
B6C3F1  mice  to determine possible  cardnogenlclty  of   toxaphene.   Treated
groups  consisted of 50  rats  and 50 mice/sex.  Matched  controls  consisted of
10  untreated  an1mals/sex/spedes  and   these  were  pooled  with 40 untreated

OlOOh                               -7-                              06/16/87

-------




















"v.
01
2
^
»
u

































41
^

,^

ae















it
urt
C
O
Q,
0*
oe










k. C
o o

ii
c
C u
oi e
£ 9
9.0

o ~S
a







01
e 3
9 vi
— O
— Q.
V X
3
O »-
9






C
TJ

•w
en

Ol


Ol
Q.



en




•

,_



Ol

y^

Ol
c
c
Ol













Ol
9

S.
U it)
Ol Q.

Ol 01

9'—
Z -I






Hi
Q. 0.
*J^ O
es* o










I-

** «/»
u. Of
1) 4)
C X
«


o "••»



1 01
01 C
3 • —

K) « C

£•£,3
>. 01 >»

— a co
ae a i—

r-
Cn
»
C • •
9 •O -0
1/1
r— C C
01
z • •

CM *O U U

1
Ol Ol 'O
9 9

99 Ol
U «9 «9 U •—
oi a. o. 01
<*- L. i_ *- .e
01 01 01 01 Ol

Z — J _J Z trt





UB
CL CX C»> A &
Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. -
l^% O 1^ la^ O C3
CSJ O CM CM O CM
i— ,- —












i i v, v.
*~ *• U L.

01 9t 9t Ol


i~~ p— OJ 

01
k.
01

£






r
a. •
o •—
U1












VI

13
41


CM









ae

VI
Ol
9
a •
VI
U
"e
01
u
9

01


v»
01

3
U •
U -0
41 •
X C

VI •
9 u
9 C
CO >—>








VI
>i
•3

en
en
L.
VI 41
— 4->
VI  01
— e
w o



^^
— • >«
^ !•
\s \<
o. 01 a. s
o o o
O 1^1 C3 ^










_
VI
VI L.
3* <9
13 01
^ >>

O r»

en en







. ^
•^f

ae
X
^*
VI

9
a





•a

c



u
c


I/I
01

3
U
Ol
X
VI
•**
01
Ol
^
^
u

Ol
9
9

VI
2
w
9

^
|

u

9





.
1
—
O













„,

•9
41


CM






ae
z

VI
>l
Ol

C
9






in
f^
91



9

—
u
3

9
*-»
C










e
Ol

•£
e.
o

UJ
Ol
Ol
e

5





•o

1














trt
t_

&>
>*

f^l






ae
z

w^
>»
a»

c
£















































—
9
C
9
u

CI
01
c
Ol
a.
X
9
**
Oi
c
c


CO C
en 9
*• u

• VI
>9 Ol
O i—
00 3

i— a.
• o
a. c
•o
CO Ol

S3 4J
*rf
• ' VI
Ol —
U C
b. —
3 e
9 -0

OTOOh
-8-
10/21/86

-------
mice/sex  or  45   untreated  rats/sex  from  other   bloassays  for  statistical
comparisons.  The dietary  concentrations  In both  species are  given  In Table
3-3.  TWA  dietary concentrations  were 99 and 198  ppm  for mice,  558  and 1112
ppm  for  male  rats,  and 540  and 1080  ppm for female rats.  Mice  received
toxaphene  for  80  weeks and were  sacrificed at 90-91  weeks.   Low-dose males
and females received 160 ppm  1n  the  diet  for  19 weeks  and then 80 ppm In the
diet for 61 weeks.  High-dose males  and  females received 320 ppm In  the diet
for  19  weeks  and  160  ppm 1n the  diet  for  61 weeks.   Doses  were  lowered
because  of mortality  1n   the  high-dose  mice.   Clinical  signs   of  toxldty
occurred  1n all   treated  mice and  Included abdominal   dlstentlon,  alopecia,
diarrhea,  rough coats  and  dyspnea.   After1 75 weeks, there  were  dose-related
differences In survival.
    Rats were  fed diets containing  toxaphene for   80 weeks  and then  observed
until 108-110  weeks.    Mean body  weights of  treated  female rats  were lower
than matched  controls   for  most  of   the  study.   Because high-dose male rats
receiving  2560 ppm  experienced  tremors  In  the  first 2 weeks, the doses for
males were lowered.   At  week 53, most  of the high-dose males  and  females
(1280 ppm)  experienced tremors  and  the  doses were again  lowered.   Clinical
signs normally associated  with  aging were  observed earlier In  treated rats
than 1n  controls.   U.S. EPA  (1985a)  concluded  that no  valid  NOAEL  could be
determined  for either rats or  mice In the NCI (1979) bloassay.
3.2.2.    Inhalation.  There were  many studies available  Involving long-term
occupational  exposures of  workers   to  toxaphene.    In most cases,  however,
exposure  levels were  not  quantified  and  workers  were  often exposed  to mix-
tures of  pesticides.   Most of the  useful  Information  relates  to Incidences
of various  types of cancer and therefore will be discussed 1n Chapter 4.
OlOOh                                -9-                              01/26/87

-------
                                   TABLE  3-3

             Chronic Toxlclty of Dietary Toxaphene In B6C3F1  Mice
                           and Osborne-Mendel Rats*
Species/Sex
 Duration
of Feeding
 (weeks)
  Toxaphene
Concentration
 (ppm diet)
           Response
  High dose
    19
    61

    19
    61
     160
      80

     320
     160
                                              Mean body weights unaffected
Mean body weights adversely
affected; several animals
died before week 19; dose-
related decrease 1n survival
Females

  Lou dose


  High dose
    19
    61

    19
    61
     160
      80

     320
     160
Mean body weights unaffected
Mean body weights unaffected;
several animals died before
week 19; dose-related decrease
1n survival
Rats/
Osborne-Mendel
  High dose
     2
    53
    25

     2
    53
    25
    1280
     643
     320

    2560
    1280
     640
                                              Mean body weights  unaffected
HyperactlvHy (week 2); gener-
alized body tremors (week 53);
mean body weights unaffected;
no dose-related decrease 1n
survival
OlOOh
                     -10-
                                        10/21/86

-------
                              TABLE 3-3 (cont.)
Species/Sex
 Duration
of Feeding
 (weeks)
  Toxaphene
Concentration
 (ppm diet)
Response
Rats/
Osborne-Mendel

Females
Low dose

High dose



55
25
55
25


640
320
1280
640


Mean body weights adversely
affected
Mean body weights adversely
affected; generalized body
tremors (week 53); no dose-
related decrease 1n survival
*Source: NCI, 1979
OlOOh
                     -11-
                                        10/21/86

-------
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   Kennedy et  al.  (1973)  conducted  a  3-generat1on  study  In
which groups  of  8  male  and  16 female SO rats were fed diets containing 25 or
100 ppm  toxaphene.   Toxaphene at 100 ppm  caused  slight  cytoplasmlc vacuoll-
zatlon 1n  livers of  parental  animals.   There were no effects on growth, mor-
tality,  organ  weights,  litter  size,  pup  survival or  weanling  body weights.
No treatment-related teratogenlc effects occurred.
    Chernoff  and Carver  (1976)  gave  gavage  doses  of  15,  25  or  35  mg/kg
toxaphene  1n  corn  oil  to groups  of 16-39  pregnant  CD rats  on  days  7-16 of
gestation.   The  highest dose was  maternally  toxic,  causing  31/4 mortality.
The two  lower doses  caused dose-related  reduction  1n weight gain  of  dams.
There were  no treatment-related changes In  fetal mortality or  occurrence of
anomalies at these maternally toxic levels.
    Kavlock  et al.  (1982)  administered  gavage  doses of  12.5  or  25  mg/kg
toxaphene  In  corn  oil  to  groups of  five  pregnant  CD rats on  days  7-16 of
gestation.   There   were no   treatment-related  effects  on   fetal  mortality,
average  number  of  Implants or  fetal body  weight.   There  was  a significant
decrease  In  fetal  kidney alkaline  phosphatase activity  at 25  mg/kg and In
total  protein 1n fetal kidneys at both doses.
    Behavioral effects  of  toxaphene may  be the most  sensitive  Indicator of
perinatal  toxldty  In  rats  (U.S. EPA,  1985a).  Olson et al.  (1980)  exposed
rats  to  0.05  mg/kg  body weight  toxaphene  through  the diet  from day  5 of
gestation  to  3 months postpartum.  Toxaphene  caused  retarded maturation, as
measured  by  swimming performance and  righting reflex  tested  on  days  7-17
postpartum.  Crowder et al. (1980)  also  reported  Impaired  righting reflex In
offspring  of  rats  receiving  6 mg/kg  toxaphene  1n  corn oil  from day  7 of
gestation until parturition.


OlOOh                                -12-                             06/16/87

-------
    DIPasquale (1977)  gave  pregnant guinea pigs  oral  doses of  15  mg/kg/day
on  days  21-35  of  gestation.   Treatment  caused  some  adverse  effects  on
collagen-containing  structures  In  the  fetus,  but  this  was  thought  to  be
caused by a functional deficiency of vitamin C related  to MFO induction.
    Chernoff and  Carver  (1976)  exposed groups  26-90 CD-I  mice  to  0,  15,  25
or  35  mg/kg  toxaphene by  gavage  In  corn oil  on  days  7-16 of  gestation.
There were  no dose-related  effects  on fetal mortality,  fetal  weight,  number
of  caudal   or  sternal ossification  centers,  or  Incidence  of  supernumerary
ribs.   Five litters   from the high-dose  group  had  one or more  fetuses  with
encephaloceles,  but  none  were observed 1n  other  groups.  There was a dose-
related  reduction  In  maternal  weight gain  and  Increase  In  relative  liver
weight  1n  treated  dams.   Chernoff and Kavlock  (1982)  reported  that adminis-
tration of  75 mg/kg  toxaphene  In  corn oil  to  pregnant  CD-I mice on days  8-12
of  gestation  caused  reduced  maternal  weight  gain  and  reduced fetal  body
weights.
    KepHnger et  al.  (1970)  conducted  a  5- to  6-generat1on study  In  which
groups of  4 male  and  14  female  Swiss  white mice were exposed to 25 ppm toxa-
phene  In  the  diet.   There were no  adverse  effects  on  Utter size,  survival,
fetal mortality, body  weight  or  Indices of  viability,  lactation  or  reproduc-
tion; however, treated rats  did have hlstologlcal changes 1n the liver.
3.3.2.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding   reproductive  effects   of
Inhalation  exposures  to  toxaphene  could  not  be located  In the  available
literature.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    There  were  several studies  available  concerning Interaction  of toxaphene
with other  pesticides.  U.S.  EPA  (1980a)  concluded  that  Induction  of hepatic
mlcrosomal  enzymes appeared to account for  most of these  Interactions.   In


OlOOh                               -13-                             06/16/87

-------
rats  pretreated  with aldrln  or dleldMn,  toxaphene  toxldty was decreased
2-fold and  toxaphene toxldty was decreased  3-fold  In rats pretreated with
DOT  (Delchmann and KepHnger, 1970).  KepHnger and Delchmann  (1967) report-
ed  that  toxaphene showed  some  degree of  antagonism  (I.e., toxldtles were
less  than  additive)  with  parathlon,  dlazlnon and Tr1th1on«.  Toxldtles of
toxaphene  and   De1nav«,   VC-13  or   malathlon  were   essentially  additive.
Crowder  (1980)  reported that toxaphene  did  not  potentiate  the  toxldty .of
methyl parathlon.
    Toxldty  from  toxaphene/Hndane  combinations  1s  unusual  In  that   the
symptoms of  toxldty associated with  the mixture differed  from those seen
when  animals or  humans  were  exposed  to either pesticide alone.  Symptoms of
the  combination   Include  aplastlc  anemia,  mild  hyperthermla  and decreased
response to stimuli (U.S.  EPA, 1980a).
OlOOh                               -14-                             06/16/87

-------
                              4.  CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
4.1.1.   Oral.   Pertinent  data concerning  cardnogenldty  of  toxaphene  1n
humans orally exposed could not be  located 1n  the  available  literature.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.   There   were   several   studies  available   concerning
occupational  exposure  to  toxaphene and  cancer  Incidence.   Barthel  (1976)
reported an  Increased  Incidence of  lung  cancer  among  285  pesticide  appU-
cators (10  observed  vs.  0.54  expected).   Barthel  (1981) found a  significant
excess  of   bronchial  carcinomas among  1658  male  plant  protection  workers
exposed  to  pesticides  Including   toxaphene.   U.S.   EPA   (1985a)   reported
results  of  other studies,  but In   no  case was a clear association  between
toxaphene  exposure  and  Incidence  of any  type of  cancer  demonstrated,  and
toxaphene exposures  were  not well quantified.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.   The  most complete   carclnogenldty  bloassays  with  toxaphene
were performed by NCI  (1979)  (see  Chapter 3).  Both  Osborne-Mendel  rats  and
B6C3F1 mice were fed diets  containing toxaphene for  80  weeks,  followed by an
observation period  of  10-11 weeks   (mice)  or  28-30  weeks (rats).   TWA  doses
were 558 and  1112 ppm  diet for male rats, 540 and  1080 ppm for  female  rats,
and  99  and 198  ppm for  male  and  female mice.   In male rats,  there was  a
dose-related  Increased  combined   Incidence   of    thyroid  folUcular   cell
adenomas or carcinomas (1/7 matched  controls,  2/44  pooled controls,  7/41  low
dose  and  9/35   high  dose).    In   female  rats,  the  Incidence  of  thyroid
folUcular  cell  adenomas was  dose-related  (0/6 matched  controls,  1/46 pooled
controls,  1/43  low  dose  and  7/42  high  dose).  The  Incidences  of  folUcular
cell adenomas or carcinomas  1n the  high-dose male  rats and  folllcular  cell
adenomas  In  high-dose   female  rats were  significantly higher  than  pooled


OlOOh                                -15-                             10/21/86

-------
controls  (p<0..05,  Fisher Exact  test)  and the  Incidences  were  significantly
dose-related  In both  cases  (p<0.05,  Cochran-Armltage  test).   The  authors
concluded  that  toxaphene  treatment  was  associated  with an  Increased  Inci-
dence  of  thyroid tumors,  suggesting that  1t  was carcinogenic  for  male  and
female  Osborne-Mendel  rats.   Reuber (1979) conducted  an Independent evalua-
tion  of the  hlstologlcal  slides  from  this  study  and  agreed  qualitatively
with  the  thyroid  tumor  conclusions.  He  also found carcinogenic  effects  In
other  organs;  however,  U.S.   EPA  (1985a)  concluded  that  his   criteria  for
cardnogenlcHy were  different from  those  commonly accepted by  others  and,
therefore, his conclusions were questionable.
    In  the  NCI  (1979)  mouse  study, the  Incidence  of  hepatocellular  carci-
nomas  was  significantly  Increased  1n  treated  mice.   Incidences were  0/10
matched controls,  4/48  pooled  controls,  34/39 low-dose and  45/46 high-dose
males,  and  0/9 matched  controls,   0/48  pooled  controls,  5/49  low-dose  and
34/39  high-dose females.   Incidences of hepatocellular carcinomas  In low  and
high-dose  males and   1n  high-dose  females  were  significantly higher  than
pooled  or  matched  control groups  (p<0.001,  Fisher  Exact  test).   Incidences
were   significantly  dose-related   (p<0.001,   Cochran-Armltage   test).    The
authors concluded  that  toxaphene  was carcinogenic  In B6C3F1  mice.   Reuber
(1979)  reviewed the hlstologlcal slides from  this  study and came to  qualita-
tively  similar  conclusions  regarding liver tumors,  but  also  reported  tumors
at sites where  NCI  (1979)  did  not.   It  1s difficult to draw conclusions  from
his findings because of the differences  between his criteria and others.
    Litton Blonetlcs,  Inc.  (1978)  fed groups  of 53-54 86C3F1  mice  0, 7,  20
or 50  ppm  toxaphene  1n the diet for 18 months,  followed by a 6-month  obser-
vation  period.  Incidences of  hepatocellular  carcinomas were 13,  20,  33  and
23% 1n  matched  controls,  low,  middle- and high-dose male mice,  respectively,


OlOOh                               -16-                             10/21/86

-------
and  2,  2,  6  and  6% In matched  controls,  low,  middle- and high-dose  female
mice, respectively.  Incidences  of  hepatocellular  adenomas  were 6, 0,  4  and
22%  1n  males  and  2,  2, 2  and  6?4  In  females  1n  the  matched  control,  low,
middle- and high-dose groups, respectively.  The only  statistically  signifi-
cant tumoMgenlc  effect was  an  Increased combined  Incidence  of hepatocellu-
lar adenomas and carcinomas 1n high-dose male mice.
    There  have  been other less  complete  studies  of toxaphene  carclnogenlc-
Hy.  Nelson  (1949)  fed groups  of 12 male and 12  female  rats  diets  contain-
ing 0, 25, 100, 400  or  1600  ppm  toxaphene  for  107  weeks.   Hlstologlcal  exam-
inations were Incomplete,  but liver and  thyroid hyperplasla were  reported 1n
treated  animals.   Four  of five  high-dose  rats  developed hepatic  carcinomas
that were not observed 1n  any other group.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Cardnogenlclty   bloassays  of  toxaphene  administered
by Inhalation exposure could not be located In  the  available literature.
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Oldenko et  al.  (1978)  administered  twice weekly  Injections of  50  mg/kg
toxaphene  In  sunflower  oil  to  mice for  "10  weeks.  Toxaphene  treatment  did
not cause an Increase 1n the Incidence of any type  of  tumor.
    Samosh (1974)  reported an Increased  frequency  of  chromosomal  aberrations
In  lymphocyte  cultures  obtained  from  eight  women  occupatlonally  exposed to
toxaphene.  In  contrast, U.S. EPA  (1978)  found no  Increased  rates  of chromo-
somal  aberrations  In  leukocytes  from  people   occupational"^  exposed  to
toxaphene.  Epstein  et  al.  (1972)  reported negative results  for toxaphene In
a mouse  dominant  lethal assay.
OlOOh                               -17-                             06/01/87

-------
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    Toxaphene  has  been  placed  In  EPA  Group  B2,  based on  positive  test
results  1n  rats  and  mice (U.S. EPA,  1986b).   Chemicals  In  this group  are
those  for  which there  Is  Inadequate  evidence  of carc1nogen1dty  from  human
studies  and  adequate  evidence from animal  studies  (U.S. EPA,  1986a).   IARC
(1979) reported that  toxaphene  1s  classified 1n  IARC  Group  28,  chemicals  for
which  there  1s  Inadequate  evidence of  cardnogenldty  In humans  and  adequate
evidence of carclnogenldty 1n animals (mice and rats).
OlOOh                               -18-                            02/13/87

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS AND  CRITERIA

    The U.S. EPA  (1980a)  recommended  ambient  water quality criteria  for  the
protection  of  human health  based  on  the results  of  the Litton  81onet1cs,
Inc.  (1978)  cancer  bloassay.   This study  was  selected  because  1t  allowed
derivation  of   slightly   more   conservative  criteria  than  the  NCI  (1979)
study.  These  criteria were derived based  on  data concerning  Incidences  of
hepatocellular  carcinomas  and  neoplatlc  nodules In male B6C3F1  mice.   Using
these data, U.S.  EPA (1980a)  calculated  a human  carcinogenic  potency  factor
(q *)  of   1.131   (mg/kg/day)'1.    The   levels  of   toxaphene   resulting   In
Incremental  Increases   1n  lifetime cancer  risk  of  10~5,  10"6  and  10"7
are  7.1,   0.71 and  0.07  ng/l,  respectively,  based  on  1ngest1on  of  2 a
water  and 6.5 g  aquatic  organisms/day.   Estimates for  the   consumption  of
aquatic  organisms  only   are  7.3,  0.73   and  0.07  ng/i;  however,  U.S.  EPA
(1982) corrected  these  values  to  5.1,  0.51  and  0.05  ng/l for  consumption
of  water  and  contaminated aquatic  organisms,  and 5.2,  0.52  and  0.05  ng/i
for consumption of aquatic organisms only.
    NAS (1977)  calculated a human  ADI  of 1.25  yg/kg toxaphene  based  on  the
Fltzhugh  and Nelson  (1951) study  In which rats receiving 25 ppm 1n the diet
for  2 years had  Increased  liver  weights and  liver  cell  enlargement.   NAS
(1977) assumed  that  the  dosage at  this  level was  1.25  mg/kg/day and divided
by an uncertainty factor  of 1000 to derive the ADI.
    The national  Interim primary  drinking water standard for  toxaphene  Is 5
ug/l  (U.S. EPA,  1976),   and  1s  based  on organoleptlc  effects   (Slgworth,
1965).   U.S.   EPA  (1976)  calculated  a  safe  level  of  25   yg/l  based  on
slight effects  or no effects  1n  rats  fed  toxaphene  at  10  ppm  In the diet,
OlOOh                               -19-                             06/01/87

-------
calculated  to  be equivalent to 1  mg/kg/day  (Lehman,  1965).  U.S. EPA  (1976)
calculated  a maximum  safe  dose for  humans  of 3.4 pg/kg/day.   The  FOA also
established  a  standard of 5 wg/i for  bottled water  (U.S. FOA, 1979).
     Tolerances  and  guidelines  for  toxaphene  1n  various   food  products  are
summarized  1n  Tables 5-1 and 5-2.
     A  TWA of  0.5  mg/m3  and a  STEL  of  1  mg/m3  have been  proposed  by ACGIH
(1984).
OlOOh                               -20-                             06/01/87

-------
                                  TABLE 5-1

      Tolerances  for Toxaphene Residues In Various Agricultural Products3
Residue
 Level
(mg/kg)
Product
Reference
            Fat of meat from cattle,  goats  and  sheep
            Fat of meat from hogs
            Fat of meat from horses
            Cranberries, hazelnuts,  hickory nuts,  horse-
            radish, parsnips, pecans,  peppers,  pimentos,
            rutabagas,  walnuts
            Collards,  kale,  spinach
aSource: U.S. EPA, 1980a
                                U.S.  FDA,  1957
                                U.S.  FDA,  1959
                                U.S.  FDA,  1962a
                                U.S.  FDA,  1957
                                U.S.  FDA, 1962a
6
5


3
2
0.1
Crude soybean
Barley, oats,
Sorghum grain
Cottonseed
Pineapple and
Soybeans, dry
011
rice, rye and wheat


bananas^
form
Sunflower seeds
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
.s.
.s.
.s.
.s.
.s.
.s.
.s.
FDA.
FDA,
FDA,
FDA,
FDA
FDA,
EPA,
1968
1958
1960
1961
1962b
1966
1977
     which  not >0.3  mg/kg will  be  1n  pulp after  the peel  1s removed  and
 discarded.
OlOOh
      -21-
    10/21/86

-------
                                   TABLE  5-2

                   Guideline Levels for Toxaphene In Foods*
                              Food                                     Level
                                                                      (mg/kg)
Fat of meat of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs                            5

Broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, celery, collards,  eggplant,         2
 kale, kohlrabi, lettuce, okra, peppers, pimentos, spinach,
 tomatoes, barley, rice (rough), rye, sorghum, bananas  (whole),
 pineapple, beans (snap, dry, Uma), peas, cauliflower, oats,
 wheat, shelled nuts, carrots, onions, parsnips,  radishes,  rutabagas

Soybeans, peanuts (ground-nut), cotton-seed oil (refined),  rape-         0.5
 seed oil (refined), soybean oil (refined), peanut oil  (refined),
 maize, rice (finished)

Milk and milk products (fat basis)                                      0.5


'Source: U.S. EPA, 1980a; WHO, 1974
OlOOh                               -22-                             10/21/86

-------
                              6.   RISK ASSESSMENT


6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfO.)
                                     O


    Because  toxaphene  is  considered  a  carcinogen,  no   RfOSQ   or



values will be calculated.



6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfO)



    Because  toxaphene  Is   considered  a  carcinogen,  no RfD-  or  RfOT  values



or CSs will be calculated.


6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^)


6.3.1.   Oral.   The   U.S.   EPA   (1980a)   has   performed   a   quantitative



cardnogenlcHy  risk  assessment   for   toxaphene  using  data  for   Increased



combined Incidences  of  hepatocellular  adenomas  or carcinomas  In male  B6C3F1



mice  from   the  Litton  B1onet1cs,  Inc.  (1978)  study.   Data  used  1n  these



calculations are  presented 1n  Table  6-1.   Dosages of  0,  0.91,  2.6 and  6.5



mg/kg/day  resulted  1n  Incidences  of  10/53,  11/54,  12/53  and  18/51,  respec-



tively.  Using  these  data and a linearized multistage  model  as  described by



U.S. EPA (1980a, 1985), a  human q  * of 1.131  (mg/kg/day)'1  was calculated.



    An examination of the  CBI  file for  toxaphene  did  not  reveal  any Informa-



tion that would modify this assessment.


6.3.2.   Inhalation.   Inhalation  data  were  Insufficient  for  performing  a



cardnogenlcHy risk assessment for toxaphene.
OlOOh                               -23-                             06/01/87

-------
                                   TABLE  6-1
                    Cancer  Data  Sheet  for  Derivation of  q-|*

Compound:  toxaphene
Reference:  Litton Blonetlcs, Inc., 1978; U.S. EPA, 1980a
Specles/straln/sex:  mice, B6C3F1, male
Route/vehicle:  diet
Length of exposure (le) = 540 days
Length of experiment (Le) = 735 days
Llfespan of animal (L) = 735 days
Body weight = 0.03 kg assumed
Tumor site and type:  hepatocellular carcinomas and neoplastlc nodules
Exposure
(ppm diet)
0
7
20
50
Transformed Dose
(mg/kg/day)
0
0.91
2.6
6.5
Incidence
No. Responding/No.
10/53
11/54
12/53
18/51

Tested




Human q-|* = 1.131 (mq/kg/day)'1
OlOOh                               -24-                             10/21/86

-------
                                7.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1984.
TLVS: Threshold Limit  values  for  chemical  substances and physical  agents  In
the  work  environment  and biological  exposure Indices with  Intended  changes
for 1984-1985.

Allen,  A.L.,  L.O.  Koller  and  G.A.  Pollock.   1983.   Effect  of  toxaphene
exposure  on  Immune responses  1n  mice.   J.   Toxlcol.  Environ.  Health.   11:
61-69.

Baeumler, W.   1975.   Nebenwerkungen  von Toxaphene  auf Mause.  Anz.  Schaed-
Ungsk. Pflanzenschutz. Umweltschutz.   48:  65-71.

Barthel,  E.   1976.   High  Incidence  of 'lung  cancer  In persons with  chronic
professional  exposure   to   pesticides  1n  agriculture.   Z.  Erkr.  Asn.-Ory.
146: 266-274.

Barthel,  E.  1981.  Increased  risk  of lung cancer on  pesticide-exposed  male
agricultural workers.   J. Toxlcol.  Environ. Health.   8:  1027-1040.

Boots  Hercules Agrochemlcals,  Inc.    n.d.  Boots  Hercules Toxaphene Insecti-
cide Summary of Toxlcologlcal Investigations.   Bulletin T-1050.

Callahan,  M.A.,   M.U.   Sllmak,  N.W.   Gabel,  et  al.   1979.   Water-related
Environmental   Fate  of  129  Priority  P-llutants.   U.S.  EPA,  Washington,  DC.
EPA  440/4-79-029A.


OlOOh                               -25-                             06/16/87

-------
Cheroff N. and  B.O. Carver.   1976.   Fetal  toxlclty  of  toxaphene  In rats  and


mice.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxlcol.  15(6):  660-664.




Chernoff, N. and  R.J.  Kavlock.  1982.  An In  vivo  teratology  screen utiliz-


ing pregnant mice.  J.  Toxlcol. Environ.  Health.   10(4-5):  541-550.




Clapp, K.L., D.M.  Nelson, J.T. Bell,  et  al.   1971.   A study  of  the effects


of  toxaphene  on  the  hepatic cells  of  rats.   JJK  Proc.  Ann.  Meet.  Western


Section, Am. Soc.  Anlm. Sc1.   22:  313-323.




Crowder,  L.A.    1980.    Mode  of   action  of  cyclodlence  Insecticides;  the


nervous system  Influenced by toxaphene.   NTIS PB80-186 042.   Ill p.   (Taken


from PESTAB/81/1767)




Crowder, L.A.,   G.C.  LAnzaro  and R.S. UhUson.   1980.  Behavioral effects  of


methyl parathlon  and toxaphene exposure  In rats.   3.  Environ.  Sd.  Health


Part B.  15: 365-378.




Delchmann,  W.B.  and  M.L. KepHnger.   1970.   Protection  against   the  acute


effects of certain pesticides  by pretreatment with aldrln, dleldrln and DOT.


JJK  Collection  of  Papers,  Inter-American Conf.  Toxlcol.  Occup.  Med., 6th,


7th  Pesticide  Symp.,  H.B. Delchmann,  J.L.  Radomskl  and  R.A.  Penalver,  Ed.

                •
Halos and Associates, Coral Gables, FL.  p.  121-123.




Dldenko, G.G.,  O.G. Petrovskaya and  T.D.  Gupalovlch.  1978.  Study  of possi-


ble  blastomogenk  properties   of  polychloroplnene  and  polychlorocamphene.


Gig. SanH.   7:  110-111.





OlOOh                               -26-                              06/16/87

-------
DIPasquale, L.C.  1977.   Interaction  of  toxaphene  with  ascorbic add  In  the
pregnant guinea  pig.   Master's  Thesis, Wright State  Univ.,  1976.   U.S.  EPA
In-house Report.

Epstein, S.S., et al.  1972.  Detection of chemical mutagens as  the dominant
lethal assay  In  the mouse.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   23:  288.  (Cited  1n
U.S. EPA, 1980a)

FHzhugh, O.G.  and  A.A.  Nelson.  1951.  Comparison  of  chronic effects  pro-
duced  1n  rats by several  chlorinated hydrocarbon  Insecticides.  Fed.  Proc.
10: 295.

Grebenyuk,  S.S.   1970.   Effect of  polychlorocamphene  on  liver  functions.
Gig. Prlmen. Toksokol.  PestHs.  Klin.  Otravlen11.   8:  166-169.

Hayes,  W.J.  1975.   Toxicology of   Pesticides.   Williams  and  Wllklns  Co.
Baltimore, MD.

Hercules,  Inc.    n.d.    Hercules  toxaphene  Insecticide.    Bulletin   T-105C.
(Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1980a)

HSOB (Hazardous  Substance Data Bank).   1986.   Report  No. 1616.   Online.

IARC  (International Agency  for  Research on Cancer).   1979.  Toxaphene (poly-
chlorinated camphenes).   IARC Monographs on  the  Evaluation  of  the Carcino-
genic  Risk of  Chemicals  to  Humans.   WHO,  IARC,  Lyons,  France.   Vol.  20,
p. 327-348.


OlOOh                               -27-                             06/16/87

-------
Kavlock, R.J.,  N.  Chernoff,  E. Rogers,  et  al.   1982.   An analysis of  feto-
toxldty using  biochemical  endpolnts  of organ  differentiation.   Teratology.
26(2): 183-194.

Kennedy, G.L.,  Jr.,  J.P.  Frawley  and J.C. Calandra.   1973.   Multlgeneratlon
reproductive effects of three  pesticides  1n  rats.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
25: 589-596.

KepHnger,   M.L.   1963.   Use  of  humans  to  evaluate  safety  of  chemicals.
Arch. Environ. Health.   6: 342-349.

KepHnger,   M.L.  and H.B.  Oelchmann.   1967.   Acute toxldty  of  combinations
of pesticides.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  10(3):  586-595;

KepHnger,  M.L., W.B. Oelchmann and F.  Sala.  1970.  Effects  of  combinations
of  pesticides  on reproduction  1n mice.   In: Collection  of Papers,   Inter-
American  Conf.  Toxlcol.   Occup.   Med.,  6th,  7th  Pesticide   Symp.,  W.B.
Delchmann,  J.O. Radomskl and R.A.  Penalver,  Ed.  Halos and Associates,  Coral
Gables, FL.   p. 125-138.

Lackey,  R.H.   1949.   Observations  on   the  acute  and chronic  toxldty  of
toxaphene In the dog.  J.  Ind.  Hyg.  Toxlcol.   31(2):  117-120.

Lehman, A.J.   1952.  Oral  toxldty  of toxaphene.   Q.  Bull.  Assoc. Food Drug
Off. U.S.  16: 47.
OlOOh                               -28-                            06/16/87

-------
LHton Blonetlcs,  Inc.   1978.   Carcinogenic evaluation  In mice.   Toxaphene.
Final  Report.   LBI  Project  No.   20602,  Kensington,  MO.    Submitted   to
Hercules, Inc., Wilmington,  OE.

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl and  O.K.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook of  Chemical
Property Estimation Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  New York.   p.  4-9.

Mohammed A.,  E. Hallberg,  3.  Rydstrom  and P.  Slanlna.  1985.   Toxaphene:
Accumulation  In  the adrenal  cortex  and  effect  on ACTH-st1mulated  cortlco-
sterold synthesis In the rat.   Toxlcol.  Lett. .24(2-3): 137-143.

NAS  (National Academy of Sciences).  1977.  Drinking Water and  Health.   Part
II.  NAS, Washington, DC.

NCI  (National  Cancer Institute).   1979.   Bloassay of  toxapherie for  possible
cardnogenesls.  NCI Cardnogenesls  Tech. Rep. Ser. No.  37.   [Also published
as DHEW (NIH) 79-837]

Nelson,  A.A.   1949.  Summary  of   pathological  changes  produced  In rats  by
feeding  40,   200  or 1000  ppm  toxaphene  or  methoxychlor  for  1   year.   FDA
memorandum to A.J.  Lehman.

Ohsawa  T.,    J.R.  Knox,  S.   Khalifa  and  J.E.   Caslda.   1975.    Metabolic
dechlorlnatlon of toxaphene 1n rats.   J.  Agrlc. Food Chem.   23(1):  98-106.
OlOOh                               -29-                             06/16/87

-------
Olson, K.L, F. Matsumura and  G.M.  Boush.   1980.   Behavioral  effects  on Juve-
nile  rats  from perinatal  exposure  to  low levels of toxaphene and  Us toxic
components,  toxicant  A,  and   toxicant  B.  Arch.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxlcol.
9(2): 247-257.

Ortega,  P.,  W.3.  Hayes and  W.F.  Durham.   1957.  Pathologic changes  In  the
liver  of  rats  after  feeding  low levels  of  various  Insecticides.   Arch.
Pathol.  64: 614-622.

Reuber,  M.O.   1979.  Cardnogenlclty  of  toxaphene,  a  review.   J.  Toxlcol.
Environ. Health.   5: 729-748.

Samosh,  L.V.   1974.  Chromosome  aberrations and  character of  satellite asso-
ciations after accidental  exposure of the human  body  to  polychlorocamphene.
TsHol. Genet.  8: 24-27.

Sanborn, J.R.,  B.M. Francis  and  R.L.  Metcalf.  1977.   The degradation  of
selected pesticides  1n  soil:  A  review of  published  literature.  U.S.  EPA,
Cincinnati, OH.  EPA 600/9-77-022.  p. 616.

Santoludto,  J.A.   1975.   The  use of  quantitative EEG  for  detecting  low-
level  prolonged  exposure   to  pesticides.   In.:  Comm.  Eur. Communities,  EUR;
ISS  EUR  5360, Proc.  Int.  Symp.  Recent.   Adv.  Assess.  Health Eff.  Environ.
Pollut.  4: 2387-2394.

Shelanskl,   H.A.    1947.    Unpublished  data.    In.:  Report  to  Environmental
Protection   Agency.   Aspects  of  Pestlcldal  Use  of Toxaphene-Terpene  Poly-
chlorinates on Man and  the Environment.   C&E D1v., U.S.  EPA.

OlOOh                               -30-                              06/16/87

-------
Shelanskl, H.A.  and A.  Gellhorn.   n.d.   Unpublished  data.   (Cited  In  U.S.
EPA, 1980a)

Slgworth,  E.A.   1965.   Identification and  removal  of herbicides and  pesti-
cides.  J. Am. Water Works Assoc.   57:  1016.

Sosnlerz, M.,  A.  Szczurek,  R. Knapek  and  A.  Kolodzlejczyk.  1972.   Morpho-
logic  studies  on  short-term  subacute  toxlclty  of  Kamfochlor.   Patol.  Pol.
23(2): 199-202.  (Taken from HAPAB/73/00683)

U.S.  EPA.   1976.    National   Interim  Primary  Drinking  Water   Regulations.
Office of Water Supply.  EPA 570/9-76-003.

U.S. EPA.  1977.  Toxaphene.  Position  document.   (Cited  1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

U.S. EPA.  1978.  Occupational exposure to  toxaphene.  Draft  of  Final  Report
by the Epldemlol. Stud. Progr., OTS, Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1979.   Review  of  the  Environmental  Effects  of  Pollutants:  X.
Toxaphene.   Health  Effects   Research  Laboratory,   Cincinnati,   OH.    EPA
600/1-79-044.

U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Ambient Water  Quality  Criteria  Document for  Toxaphene.
Prepared by  the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for  the Office of Water Regu-
lations and Standards,  Washington, DC.   EPA 440/5-80-076.  NTIS  PB81-117863.
OlOOh                               -31-                             06/16/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1980b.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  In  the  Preparation  of
Health . Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.  45(231): 79347-79357.

U.S.  EPA.   1982.    Errata   for  Ambient  Water  Quality  Criteria  Documents.
Prepared by  the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental Assessment, Environmental
Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH   for  the  Office of  Water
Regulations and Standards,  Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1983.   Methodology and Guidelines  for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations Based  on  Chronic  ToxIcHy  Data.  Prepared  by  the  Office of Health
and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,
Cincinnati,  OH  for  the   Office   of  Solid   Waste  and  Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1985.   National  Primary  Drinking  Water  Regulations:  Synthetic
Organic  Chemical,   Inorganic Chemicals  and  Microorganisms,  Proposed  Rule.
Federal Register.  50(219): 46936-47022.

U.S.  EPA.   1986a.    Guidelines   for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.  1986b.   Evaluation of  the Potential CardnogenlcHy of Toxaphene.
Prepared  by  the Office of  Health and Environmental  Assessment,  Carcinogen
Assessment Group, Washington, DC  for  the  Office  of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Washington, DC.
OlOOh                               -32-                             06/16/87

-------
U.S.  FDA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1957.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals In  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  22:  4615.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1958.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals In  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  23:  477.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1959.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals 1n  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  24:  4727.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1960.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals In  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  25:  5335.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1961.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals 1n  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  26:  11799.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and Drug Administration).  1962a.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals In  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.   Tolerances   for   residues   of   toxaphene.    Federal  Register.   27:
7492-7493.

U.S.  FDA  (Food and Drug Administration).  1962b.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals 1n  or  on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.  Tolerances for residues of toxaphene.   Federal  Register.  27:  4913.
OlOOh                               -33-                             06/16/87

-------
U.S.  FOA  (Food and  Drug  Administration).   1966.  Tolerances  and  exemptions
from  tolerances  for  pesticide chemicals  In  or on raw  agricultural  commodi-
ties.   DDT   and   Toxaphene:   Tolerances   for   Combined  Residues.    Federal
Register.   31: 9453-9454.

U.S. FDA  (Food and Drug Administration).   1968.   Food  Additives Permitted In
Food  for  Human  Consumption.   DOT  and Toxaphene:  Tolerances  for  Residues.
DDT and Toxaphene: Tolerances  for  Combined Residues.   Federal Register.   31:
12435.

U.S. FDA  (Food and Drug Administration).   1979.  Quality  Standard  for  Foods
with  No   Identity  Standards.   Bottled  Water.    Federal   Register.    44:
12169-12175.  (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1985a)

WHO  (World  Health  Organization).   1974.   Evaluation  of  some  pesticide
residues  In  foods.   Camphechlor  Pestle. Residues Ser.  No.  3   (Cited  In  U.S.
EPA, 1980a)
OlOOh                               -34-                             06/16/87

-------
                                   APPENDIX

     Summary Table for  Oral  Toxldty  of  Toxaphene  Using Male  B6C3F1 Mice*
Experimental Exposure/
        Dose
        Effect
     Ql*
(mg/kg/dayr1
0, 7, 20 or 50 ppm
diet for 18 months,
followed by 6 months
observation (0, 0.91,
2.6, 6.5 mg/kg/day)
hepatocellular adenomas
or carcinomas
    1.131
*Source: Litton Blonetlcs,  Inc.,  1978;  U.S.  EPA,  1980a
OlOOh
     -35-
     06/01/87

-------