_      TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            fntatftta liuovettont on tkt rtvtnt before eompJetuifj
 L REPORT MO.
  EPA/600/8-89/094
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Updated Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene
             3. REClUENT-S ACCESSION NO
              PB90-142464/AS
             *. REPORT DATE
                                                           *. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                             PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
B. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office of Research and Development
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 Cineinnati.  OH  45268	
             13. TYPE Or REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                EPA/600/22
IS SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
   This  report summarizes and evaluates  information relevant to a preliminary interim
 assessment  of adverse health effects associated with specific chemicals  or  compounds.
 The Office  of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses these documents  in
 preparing cost-benefit analyses under Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under
 CERCLA.  All  estimates of acceptable intakes  and carcinogenic potency  presented in
 this document should be considered as preliminary and reflect limited  resources
 allocated to  this project.  The intent  in these assessments is to suggest acceptable
 exposure levels whenever sufficient data  are  available.  The interim values presented
 reflect the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure or risk to the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values have been
 estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not the  endpoint of
 concern).   The first, RfD$ or subchronic  reference dose, is an estimate  of  an exposure
 level that  would not be expected to cause adverse effects when exposure  occurs  during
 a limited time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level  that  would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a significant portion
 of the  lifespan.  For compounds for which there is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity, qi*s have been computed, if  appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation  data if available.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  OMCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTlHERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                          c.  COSATi Field/Croup
 •. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Public
It SECURITY CLASS (Thu Rrport)

  Unclassified
                                                                         21. NO. Of PACES
                                              90. SECURITY CLASS (This ptft/
                                                Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
    Fw» 2220-1 («•». 4-77)   VRKVIOU* COITION if OMOLCTK

-------
                                            EPA/600/8-89/094
                                            May,  1988
          HEALTH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT
               FOR NAPHTHALENE
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            CINCINNATI, OH  45268

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This  document  has-been  reviewed  In  accordance with  the U.S.  Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency's   peer  and administrative  review  policies  and
approved  for  publication.   Mention  of  trade names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE


    This report  summarizes  and evaluates Information relevant  to  a prelimi-
nary  Interim  assessment of  adverse health  effects associated  with naphtha-
lene.   All  estimates  of acceptable  Intakes  and  carcinogenic  potency  pre-
sented  In  this  document should  be  considered  as  preliminary and  reflect
limited  resources  allocated  to  this  project.    Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and
environmental data  were located  through  on-Hne literature searches  of  the
TOXLINE, CANCERLINE  and the CHEMFATE/DATALOG data bases.  The  basic  litera-
ture  searched  supporting this document  1s  current up  to  Hay,  1987.   Secon-
dary  sources of  Information  have  also been  relied  upon  1n the preparation of
this  report  and  represent  large-scale health assessment  efforts  that  entail
extensive  peer   and Agency  review.   The  following  Office  of  Health  and
Environmental Assessment (OHEA) sources have been extensively utilized:

    U.S. EPA.   1980a.   Ambient Water  Quality  Criteria  for Naphthalene.
    Prepared  by  the  Office of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,
    Environmental  Criteria   and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for
    the  Office  of   Water  Regulations  and  Standards,  Washington,  DC.
    EPA-440/4-80-059.  NTIS  PB 81-117707.

    U.S. EPA.  1982.   Revision and  Update of  Hazard  Profile  on  Naphtha-
    lene.  Prepared by  the  Office  of Health and  Environmental  Assess-
    ment, Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH
    for  the  Office  of  Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response,  Washington,
    DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1983.    Reportable  Quantity  Document   for  Naphthalene.
    Prepared  by  the  Office of  Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,
    Environmental  Criteria   and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for
    the Office of Emergency  and Remedial Response,  Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Health and  Environmental  Effects Profile  for
    Naphthalene.   Prepared   by the  Office  of  Health and  Environmental
    Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and Assessment  Office,  Cincin-
    nati,  OH  for  the   Office  of Solid  Waste and Emergency  Response,
    Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Summary  Review  for  Health  Effects  Associated
    with Naphthalene:   Health  Issue Assessment.  Prepared by  the Office
    of  Health and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and
    Assessment Office,  Research Triangle  Park, NC  for the Office of Air
    Quality Planning and Standards  and  the  Office  of  Air  and  Radiation,
    Washington,  DC.

    The Intent In these  assessments  Is  to suggest  acceptable  exposure  levels
for   noncardnogens  and risk  cancer   potency   estimates  for  carcinogens
whenever sufficient  data were  available.   Values were  not derived  or  larger
uncertainty  factors were employed  when  the  variable  data  were limited  In
scope   tending   to   generate  conservative   (I.e.,   protective)   estimates.
Nevertheless, the  Interim  values  presented  reflect  the  relative  degree  of
hazard or risk associated with exposure to the chemical(s) addressed.
                                      111

-------
    Whenever  possible,  two  categories  of  values  have  been  estimated  for
systemic  toxicants  (toxicants  for  which  cancer  Is   not  the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first,  RfD$ (formerly  AIS)  or  subchronlc reference  dose,  Is
an estimate of an  exposure level  that  would not  be expected to cause adverse
effects  when  exposure  occurs during  a limited  time  Interval  (I.e.,  for  an
Interval  that  does not constitute  a  significant  portion of  the  Hfespan).
This type of  exposure  estimate  has  not been extensively  used, or  rigorously
defined,  as  previous risk  assessment efforts have been primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants 1n  ambient  air  or  water   where  lifetime
exposure  Is  assumed.   Animal   data  used  for   RFD$   estimates   generally
Include  exposures  with  durations  of 30-90  days.   Subchronlc  human  data  are
rarely available.  Reported  exposures  are usually  from chronic  occupational
exposure  situations  or  from reports  of acute  accidental  exposure.   These
values   are   developed   for  both   Inhalation   (RfD$j)  and  oral   (RfD$o)
exposures.

    The  RfD   (formerly  AIC)  Is   similar  1n concept  and  addresses  chronic
exposure.  It Is an  estimate of an exposure level  that  would not be expected
to cause adverse effects  when exposure  occurs  for a significant  portion  of
the Hfespan  [see  U.S.  EPA  (1980b)  for  a discussion of  this  concept].   The
RfD  1s  route-specific  and  estimates  acceptable  exposure  for  either  oral
(RfD0)  or  Inhalation   (RfDj)  with  the  Implicit  assumption  that  exposure
by other routes 1s Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)  for  noncardnogens   have   also  been  calculated
where  data  permitted.   These  values  are  used   for  Identifying  reportable
quantities and  the methodology for  their development  Is explained  In  U.S.
EPA (1984).

    For  compounds  for  which  there Is  sufficient  evidence of  carclnogenldty
RfD$ and RfD/ values are  not derived.  For a  discussion of risk  assessment
methodology for  carcinogens  refer  to  U.S.  EPA  (1980b).   Since cancer  Is  a
process  that  Is  not  characterized by  a  threshold, any  exposure contributes
an  Increment  of  risk.   For  carcinogens,  q-j*s  have been  computed,  1f appro-
priate,  based on oral and Inhalation data 1f available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place  the  risk  assessment  evaluation  In  proper  context.
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.   The  preface  outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all  documents  of  this  series  as  well  as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of the quantitative estimates.

    An  RfD$o  and  RfDg  for  naphthalene of  29  mg/day was  derived  from  a
chronic dietary study  In rats.   Data were  Insufficient  for derivation of an
RfD$i  or  RfDj  for  naphthalene.   A  CS  of  13.2 was  based  on kidney lesions
1n rats 1n a subchronlc gavage study.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation   for   EPA's  Environmental   Criteria  and  Assessment   Office,
Cincinnati,  OH.    Dr.  Christopher  DeRosa  and  Karen  Blackburn  were  the
Technical  Project  Monitors  and  Helen  Ball  was  the  Project  Officer.   The
final documents 1n this series  were  prepared  for  the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response,  Washington, DC.

    Scientists from  the following U.S.  EPA offices  provided  review comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of  Air Quality Planning  and Standards
         Office of  Solid Waste
         Office of  Toxic Substances
         Office of  Drinking Water

Editorial review for  the document series was provided by the following:

    Judith Olsen and  Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH

Technical  support  services  for  the document  series  was provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Pat Daunt, Karen Mann  and Jacky Bohanon
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.
2.


3.










4.








5.
6.




ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2. INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
3.3.1. Oral 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
3.4. TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
4.4. HEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfD$) 	
6.1.1. Oral (RfDso) 	
6.1.2. Inhalation (RfDcr) 	
Page
1
. . . 3
. . . 3
, , . 3
, , 4
, , 4
. . . 4
, . . 5
, , . 5
. . . 5
. . . 6
. . . 6
. . . 6
7
. . . 7
. . . 8
. . . 8
. . . 8
. . . 8
8
. . . 8
8
. . . 8
. . . 10
, , 11
. . . 12
. . . 12
. . . 12
. . . 12

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                        Page

     6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)	    13

            6.2.1.    Oral  (Rf00)	    13
            6.2.2.    Inhalation (RfDi)  	    13

     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY  (q-|*)	    14

            6.3.1.    Oral	    14
            6.3.2.    Inhalation	    14

 7.  REFERENCES	    15

APPENDIX: Summary Table for  Naphthalene	    24

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

ADI                     Acceptable dally Intake
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CS                      Composite score
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient
HEO                     Minimum effective dose
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
PAH                     Polycycllc aromatic hydrocarbons
PEL                     Permissible exposure limit
ppm                     Parts per million
RfD                     Reference dose
RfDj                    Inhalation reference dose
RfD0                    Oral reference dose
RfD$                    Subchronlc reference dose
RfD$i                   Subchronlc Inhalation reference dose
RfD$o                   Subchronlc oral reference dose
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV(j                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
STEL                    Short-term exposure limit
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
                                      1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    The physical  and  chemical  properties and environmental  fate  of  naphtha-
lene (CAS No. 91-20-3) are as follows:

    Chemical class:                   polycycllc aromatic hydrocarbon
    Molecular weight:                  128.19 (Callahan et al.,  1979)
    Vapor pressure at  25°C::          0.082 mm Hg (MacKay et al.,  1982)
    Water solubility at 25°C:         31.7 mg/l (MacKay et al.,  1980)
    Log octanol/water
    partition coefficient:            3.30 (Hansch and Leo,  1985)
    Koc:                              1288 (Sabljlc, 1984)
    BCF:                              20-567 (U.S. EPA, 1986a;  Correa and
                                      Venables, 1985)
    Half-lives 1n
      A1r:                            8-12 hours (U.S. EPA,  1986a)
      Mater:                          2.3 days (Zoeteman et  al.,  1980)
      Soil:                           3.6 months (U.S. EPA,  1986a;
                                      NLM, 1987)

    The dominant  removal  mechanism  for  napthalene  1n  air  1s  predicted to  be
reaction  with  photochemically generated  hydroxyl radicals.  In  photochemical
smog  situations,   reaction  with  NO. radicals  1s  expected  to occur  but  the
half-life of  this process  (15 hours)  1s longer than  the half-life  because  of
Us OH  radical  reaction  (8-12 hours)  (U.S.  EPA, 1986a).   Significant  removal
from the atmosphere by wet or dry deposition 1s unlikely (U.S.  EPA,  1986a).
    The  removal   of  naphthalene  from a  shallow,  rapidly   flowing  stream  Is
predicted  to  be  as  follows:  volatilization,  80%; sediment sorptlon, 15.5%;
0014H                               -1-                              04/26/88

-------
microblal degradation,  4.4X;  photolysis,  <1% (U.S. EPA,  1986a).   Bloaccumula-
tlon In  aquatic  organisms  Is  not expected to be  significant  (U.S.  EPA,  1986a;
NLM, 1987).  The aquatic half-life reported  (Zoeteman et  al.,  1980)  Is  for  the
overall half-life of naphthalene 1n a river.
    Naphthalene  1s adsorbed moderately  to soil  and 1s expected  to  blodegrade.
Blodegradatlon  may  be  rapid  In  soils   previously   contaminated   with  PAHs
(half-life hours to days) but will be slow otherwise  (NLM,  1987).   Significant
amounts  of naphthalene  may  be  lost  by  volatilization  from  soil  surfaces.
Groundwater contamination has been  detected  at  waste  disposal sites  and spill
sites  (U.S.  EPA, 1986a).  The  estimated  volatilization  half-life of naphtha-
lene from a soil  containing  1.25%  organic  carbon  was  1.1 day  at  a depth  of
1 cm and 14 days at a depth of 10 cm (U.S. EPA,  1986a).
0014H                               -2-                              05/20/88

-------
            2.   ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Information regarding  the absorption of naphthalene  1n  humans  and animals
1s limited.  When  Ingested as  a  solid,  naphthalene 1s sufficiently absorbed to
cause  toxlclty  1n man  (Chusld and  Fried,  1955;  Zuelzer and  Apt,  1949;  Nash,
1903;  Gross  et  al.,  1958; Haggerty,  1956).  Furthermore,  naphthalene  seems to
be more  toxic  when dissolved  1n oil  before  1ngest1on (Talakln,  1966).  Summer
et  al.  (1979)  observed  a   dose-related  Increase  In  the  24-hour   urinary
excretion  of thloethers  by   adult  male  SPF  Wlstar  rats  given  single  gavage
doses  of naphthalene  In oil  of 30-200 mg/kg.   Urinary  thloether  accounted for
26-39%  of  the  administered  dose  of naphthalene, which  suggests 26-39%  as  a
minimum  estimate  of  the  extent  of  gastrointestinal  absorption.   Bock et  al.
(1979) measured the  uptake of radioactivity from  the Isolated In situ jejunum
of  rats  given  a  dose  of  14C-naphthalene.   Approximately 84% of the dose  of
radioactivity   was  found   1n  the  portal   blood  within   30  minutes   of
administration.    These   data   suggest   that  gastrointestinal  absorption  of
naphthalene  1n  rats  Is  both  rapid  and  extensive.  Sanborn and  Mallns  (1977)
suggested  that  naphthalene may be  absorbed  to a  greater  extent  when  Ingested
In water than In food.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Data regarding the  absorption  of Inhaled naphthalene are limited;  however,
Valaes et  al. (1963) reported  toxldty and  death  In newborn Infants exposed to
naphthalene  vapors from clothes  or blankets  that were  stored 1n or  near  the
Infants' rooms.
0014H                               -3-                              04/20/88

-------
                3.  TOXICITY  IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.   SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.   Several  Investigators  (Anz1ulew1cz  et  al.,  1959;  Zlnkham
and  Chllds,  1958) reported  the  occurrence  of hemolytlc  anemia 1n  Infants
born  to  mothers who  had  "sniffed"  and Ingested  unspecified quantities  of
naphthalene  (1n  the   form  of  mothballs)  during  pregnancy.   The  mothers
themselves were also anemic,  but  to a lesser  extent than  were the Infants.
    Several animal  studies focused  upon ocular  effects  of  naphthalene,  but
failed  to mention  whether  any  other  signs  of  toxlclty were  measured  or
observed.  Fltzhugh and Buschke (1949)  observed slight cataracts  In weanling
rats  exposed  to  2%  naphthalene  1n  the diet  for  60 days.   Assuming a  rat
consumes food equivalent to 5% of  Us body weight/day, this  dietary level  1s
equivalent to  a dose  of  1  g/kg  bw/day.   In  two  separate  studies,  rabbits
exposed  to 1  g  naphthalene/kg  bw/day by gavage (either  In light  paraffin  or
an  unspecified  vehicle)  for   -46  days   developed  cataracts   (Ghettl   and
MaManl, 1956; Van Heynlngen and P1r1e, 1976)  and  degeneration of  the retina
(Van Heynlngen and P1r1e, 1976) within the  first  few days of  treatment.
    In an  NTP  (1980a)  sponsored  study,  groups of  10  male and 10  female  F344
rats were  treated  by  gavage  with  naphthalene  1n corn oil at  0,  25,  50,  100,
200  or  400 mg/kg, 5 days/week  for 13  weeks.  At  400 mg/kg, two males  died
and  rats of  both sexes  experienced  diarrhea,  lethargy,  hunched  posture  and
rough hair coats.  A >10%  decrease  In body weight  gain was  observed 1n males
at  >200  mg/kg  and  In  females  at >100 mg/kg.  Kidney  lesions  occurred  In
males at >200 mg/kg and  lymphold depletion of  the  thymus occurred 1n females
at  400 mg/kg.   Mild  changes  1n hematologlc parameters were  observed 1n  both
sexes at 400 mg/kg.  Eye lesions were not  observed.   The 50  mg/kg dosage was
a NOEL 1n rats 1n this study.


0014H                               -4-                              04/20/88

-------
    A similar  study  was  performed 1n groups  of  10  male  and 10 female B6C3F1
mice treated  by  gavage with naphthalene 1n corn  oil  at  0,  12.5,  25,  50, 100
or  200  mg/kg, 5 days/week  for  13  weeks  (NTP,  1980b).   Seven  mice  (three
males and  two females  of  the 200  mg/kg group,  one  female of the  25 mg/kg
group and  one control male)  died  during the  2nd,  3rd and 4th weeks  of the
study  from   gavage   trauma  or  accident.    Transient   signs  of  toxldty
(lethargy, rough  halrcoats  and decreased food consumption) occurred  1n  both
sexes at  200 mg/kg.    Body  weight  gains of treated males  exceeded controls;
treated  females  had   slight  but  probably not  biologically  significant dose-
related  decreases In body  weight   gain.   There  were no  treatment-related
hlstopathologlc lesions or hematologlc effects.
    Shopp  et  al. (1984)  administered naphthalene  1n  corn  oil by  gavage  to
groups  of  40-112  CD-I  mice/sex  at  0  (untreated  control),  0  (vehicle
control),  5.3, 53 or  133 mg/kg/day  for 90 consecutive days.   There  were  no
effects  on survival,  body  weights,  serum enzyme  or  electrolyte  levels,  or
1mmunolog1c parameters,  although  females at 133 mg/kg/day  had reduced abso-
lute and  relative spleen weights.   There  was no evidence  of  a naphthalene-
Induced  hemolytlc anemia,  cataract  formation  or  pathologic  damage  to  the
lungs.   A  dose-related  Inhibition  of  hepatic  aryl  hydrocarbon  hydroxylase
activity was  observed In both sexes,  but  the toxlcologlcal  significance  of
this observation   1s unclear.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data regarding  the  subchronlc  toxlclty  of
Inhaled naphthalene were not located 1n the available literature.
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.    In   the  only  chronic  study  available,   Schmahl   (1955)
administered  naphthalene  1n  the  diet  to  BDI and  BDIII rats  at a dose  of
10-20 mg/rat/day  for 700 days.   The total  cumulative dosage was  10  g/rat.
The rats were  observed until they died  spontaneously; a  comprehensive gross

0014H                               -5-                              05/20/88

-------
and  limited  hlstopathologlc examination was  then  performed.  There were  no
treatment-related effects  on survival  (the  "Hfespan  of these rats  exceeded
800 days) or on hlstopathology.   No other signs of  toxldty were  reported.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  Chronic data regarding  the  Inhalation of  naphthalene
are  limited  to  two studies  of  occupational  exposure.  Van  der  Hoeve  (1906)
reported  that  one  man  who  worked  with  powdered   naphthalene  developed
cataracts and  retinal  hemorrhage,  while another  man exposed similarly  had
choMoretlnltls.   Ghettl   and   Mar1an1   (1956)  reported  that  8/21  workers
exposed  to  unspecified  "high"   concentrations  of  naphthalene in  a  dye-manu-
facturing process  developed cataracts.  Since  these  men  were  <50 years  of
age, 1t 1s unlikely that they would have developed  cataracts spontaneously.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER  REPRODUCTIVE  EFFECTS
3.3.1.   Oral.   Hatorova  and Chetverlkova  (1981)  administered   naphthalene
by  gavage at  0.075, 0.15 or 70 mg/kg/day  to pregnant white mongrel rats  on
days 1-19 of gestation.  There  1s  a  dlscrepency  In this  paper  In that  1n  the
abstract the highest dose 1s IVsted  a  7 mg/kg/day.  However, 70  mg/kg/day  Is
consistently specified  1n  the remainder of the paper.  The  rats  were  sacri-
ficed for examination on gestation day  19.   No grossly  visible developmental
defects were observed at  any dosage and no microscopic anomalies were noted
at  0.075 mg/kg/day.  At >0.15 mg/kg/day, there was  an Increased  Incidence  of
fetuses with subcutaneous  hematomas;  embryonic mortality  and prelmplantatlon
loss were also  Increased. The length  of gestation  1n  rats  allowed to deliver
appeared to  be  Increased  to up  to  27  days  1n the  treated  groups.   At >0.15
mg/kg/day, rats were born with  black tails  that fell off 6-8 hours later.
    Plasterer et  al.  (1985) administered naphthalene 1n  corn oil  by  gavage
to  50 mated CO-1  mice at  300 mg/kg/day on  days 7-14 of gestation.  A vehicle
control group was maintained.   Maternal  toxldty was  manifested  as Increased
mortality and reduced body  weight  gain.  Fetal toxldty was manifested as  a

0014H                               -6-                              05/20/88

-------
reduced number of  live young  at  birth,  which  the authors  attributed to early
fetal resorptlons.  The young were not examined for terata.
    Naphthalene  or  Us  metabolites  are  known  to  cross  the  placenta  In
sufficient quantities  to  cause fetotoxlc effects  (Anz1ulew1cz et  al.,  1959;
Van der Hoeve, 1913).  These  effects  Included  hemolytlc anemia  1n  humans and
cataracts and retinal damage  1n  rabbits.   Doses  either were not  estimated or
were  not  reported  In  the secondary  sources.   The  1.p.  Injection  of  395
mg/kg/day naphthalene  1n  corn  oil to  Sprague-Dawley rats  on  days 1-15  of
gestation did not result In any  evidence  of maternal  or  fetotoxldty  (Hardln
et al., 1981).
3.3.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent   data   regarding   the   teratogenlclty   of
Inhaled naphthalene were not located 1n the available literature.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    A woman  exposed for 3 weeks to a  combination of naphthalene  and  para-
dlchlorobenzene  (while  mothproofing  clothing) developed  aplastlc anemia  1
month after exposure (Harden and Baetjer,  1978).   No  other  cases of aplastlc
anemia associated  with  exposure to either napthalene or  paradlchlorobenzene
alone have been reported 1n the literature.
0014H                               -7-                              05/20/88

-------
                             4.  CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUNAN DATA
4.1.1.   Oral.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  carclnogenldty  of  Ingested
naphthalene 1n humans were not  located 1n the available literature.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.   Wolf (1976) reported  that  6/15 workers exposed  for  up
to  32  years  to vapors of  both  naphthalene and coal  tar  developed laryngeal
carcinomas  (4)  or neoplasms  of the  pylorus and  cecum  (2).   There was  no
control group.
4.2.   8IOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.   Schmahl  (1955)  Investigated  the carcinogenic  potential  of
napthalene administered  orally  1n  rat strains BOI  and BDII.  A group  of  28
rats were exposed to 10-20 mg/day 1n  the  feed  for  700 days  (total  cumulative
dose  of  10  g  naphthalene/rat)  and  monitored   for  up  to  1000  days.   A
carcinogenic response was not observed.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Adklns et  al.  (1986)  tested  naphthalene  1n  the  mouse
pulmonary adenoma  Induction  test  using groups of  30 female strain  A/J  mice
at  6-8  weeks  of age.  Exposure  to  0, 10 or 30  ppm (0, 52 or 157  mg/m3),  6
hours/day, 5  days/week for 6 months  did not elicit  a carcinogenic response.
Positive controls consisted  of  20  female mice given  a  single  Intraperltonal
Injection  of  urethane and  sacrificed  after a  26-week  observation  period.
All positive  controls  developed tumors.   NTP  (1987) 1s  currently examining
the effects of 10 and 30  ppm napthalene on mice 1n a 2-year  Inhalation study.
4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    The  genotoxlc  activity  of  naphthalene  has   been  tested  in   several  Uj
vitro  systems.   Cell  transformation  was  not  seen   1n  rodent  embryo  cells
pretreated with  leukemia virus  and  exposed  to concentrations  of  naphthalene
up  to  100  mg/8,  of  culture medium  (Freeman  et  al.,  1973;   Rh1m et  al.,
1974).   Similarly,  cell  transformations  were  not  seen In  a murlne mammary

0014H                               -8-                              04/26/88

-------
gland  organ  culture  system at  naphthalene  concentrations up  to 1000  mg/a.
of  culture  medium  (TonelH  et  al.,  1979).   Naphthalene  did not cause  £NA
damage In a rat hepatocyte alkaline elutlon assay (S1na et al.,  1983).
    Naphthalene  was  not  found  to  be mutagenlc  In a  number of  bacterial/
mlcrosomal  assay  systems  (McCann   et  al.,  1975;  Kraemer  et  al.,  1974;
Mortelmans et al., 1986).
    Knake  (1956) administered  coal   tar  napthalene 1n  sesame  oil  subcuta-
neously  to  40  white rats  every  2 weeks for  7  doses,  and observed  the  rats
for 18  months.   A control  group  of  40  rats  received Injections of  corn  oil
alone.   Carbolfuchsln,  a  known  carcinogen,  was painted  on  the skin  before
Injection.  The  naphthalene contained Impurities that were equivalent  to  10%
methyl  naphthalene.   Thirty-four of  40  naphthalene treated rats  survived to
termination and  5 of these developed Invasive  or  metastatlc  lymphosarcomas.
In  the  controls,  32  survived  and only 1 developed  lymphosarcoma.  In  a  skin
painting  study,   Knake  (1956)  applied  coal   tar  naphthalene In  benzene  or
benzene alone to  Inbred  black  mice 5 days/week  for  life.   Lymphatic  leukemia
developed  In  4/25 naphthalene treated  mice  compared  with  0/21  In  benzene
treated controls and 5/1227 historical controls.
    Naphthalene   was   negative  for   Induction   of  j-Gtf  foci,  which   was
considered  to   be a  preneoplastlc  response,  1n   the  livers  of partially
hepatectomlzed  rats  (Tsuda et al.,  1980).  U.S.  EPA  (1980a, 1986a)  listed
other studies, which  were Insufficiently  reported or otherwise flawed,  that
provided  no  evidence  of  cardnogenldty  for  naphthalene  (Boyland  et  al.,
1964; Kennaway,  1930;  Kennaway and  Helger,  1930;  Bogdat'eva and Bid,  1955;
Schmeltz et al.,  1978).
0014H                               -9-                              04/20/88

-------
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    IARC has  not  evaluated the risk  to  humans that 1s associated  with  oral
or  Inhalation  exposure   to   naphthalene.    Naphthalene   was   negative   for
carclnogenlclty  1n  oral  (Schmahl,  1955;  Oruckrey  and  Schmahl,  1955)  and
Inhalation   (Adklns   et   a!.,  1986).   However,   each  of   these   studies
Individually  appear  to  have  been  Inadequately  designed.    Applying   the
criteria for  evaluating  the  overall  weight  of evidence  for  carclnogenlclty
adopted by  the EPA  (U.S.  EPA, 1986c),  the  evidence for  carclnogenlclty  of
naphthalene  1n  humans  and  animals  1s  Inadequate  and  the  chemical  1s
designated  as  Group 0 -- not  classifiable as to carclnogenlclty to  humans.
This  qualitative  assessment  Is  consistent with  that  of  U.S. EPA  (1986a).
The assessment  should be  reevaluated pending the  final  results of  the NTP
bloassay of naphthalene.
0014H                               -10-                             05/20/88

-------
                     5.   REGULATORY  STANDARDS  AND  CRITERIA

    The ACGIH  (1986a)  has recommended a  TLV-TWA  of 10 ppm (50 mg/m3)  and  a
STEL of  15  ppm (75  mg/m3)  for occupational  exposure  to  naphthalene.   Since
eye  Irritation  was  seen  at  15  ppm,  this criterion  was  chosen  "to  prevent
ocular effects  but possibly  not blood changes  1n hypersusceptlbles"  (ACGIH,
1986b).   The  OSHA  (1985)   standard  for  exposure  to  naphthalene  In  the
workplace 1s a PEL of 10 ppm (50 mg/m3).
0014H                               -11-                             04/20/88

-------
                              6.   RISK  ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfOc)
                                     %>
6.1.1.   Oral  (RfDgg).   The only  subchronlc  oral studies  that were  suffi-
cient  to be  considered for  risk assessment  are the  NTP  (1980a,b)  90-day
gavage  studies  (rats and  mice)  and  the  Shopp et al.  (1984)  90-day  gavage
study  (mice).    Rats  appear  to  be   somewhat  more  sensitive  than  mice  to
naphthalene and, therefore, are selected as the model of  choice for  deriving
an  RfD-Q.   Rats were  treated with  naphthalene  1n  corn  oil  at  0,  25,  50,
100,  200 or 400 mg/kg,  5  days/week  (NTP,  1980a).   Gross signs of  toxlclty
and mortality  occurred  1n  both sexes  at  400  mg/kg, hlstopathologlc  lesions
and reduced  body weight gain  occurred 1n both sexes  at  200  mg/kg,  reduced
body weight  gain occurred  In  females at 100 mg/kg, and 50 mg/kg appeared to
be  a  NOEL.   When the NOEL  of 50 mg/kg  1s  multiplied  by 5/7  to expand  from
treatment on 5 days/week to dally  treatment,  1t corresponds  to a  transformed
dose of 36 mg/kg/day.
    Application of an uncertainty factor of 100,  10  to  extrapolate from rats
to  humans and  10 to protect more sensitive humans, to  the NOEL of 36  mg/kg/
day would  result  1n  an RfDSQ  of 0.36  mg/kg/day,  which  1s lower than  the
chronic  RfDQ  derived  1n  Section 6.2.1.   The subchronlc   NTP (1980a)  rat
study,   therefore,  Is  not  chosen  as  the   basis  for   an  RfDso   but  Is
considered  to  support  the  chronic oral  NOEL  of 41 mg/kg/day  In the  Schmahl
(1955)  study that  served  as   the  basis for  the  chronic  RfDg.   Because  of
the similarity  In  the chronic and  subchronlc  NOELs,  the chronic  RfD  of 0.4
mg/kg/day  or 29  mg/day from  the Schmahl  (1955)  study  1s  adopted  as  the
RfD™  for  naphthalene.   Medium  confidence  Is  placed  1n  this     cn.
discussed In Section 6.2.1.
6.1.2.   Inhalation  (RfD.j).   The  lack  of  pertinent,  quantitative  data
precludes assessment of risk associated with Inhalation of naphthalene.

0014H                               -12-                             04/26/88

-------
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
6.2.1.   Oral  (RfDg).   The  only  chronic oral  study  located  1n the  avail-
able literature was  the dietary cancer  study  by  Schmahl  (1955)  In which rats
received  a  total   dose  of   10  g  of  naphthalene  over  a  700-day  period.
Assuming  a  reference   body  weight  for rats  of  0.35 kg,  naphthalene  was
consumed at  a  dosage rate of 41 mg/kg/day.  No  effects were  observed  In the
treated rats.  The NOEL of 41 mg/kg/day Is  supported by  the NOEL for rats of
36 mg/kg/day In  the  subchronlc  NTP (1980a) gavage  study.   Application  of an
uncertainty  factor  of  100,  10 to  extrapolate  from rats  to humans and  10 to
protect more sensitive humans,  results In an  RfDQ of 0.4 mg/kg/day  or  29
mg/day for a 70  kg human.   This analysis 1n consistent with  an  earlier U.S.
EPA  (1986a)  derivation.   Confidence 1n  the data base Is medium  because the
cardnogenldty,  developmental   and  reproductive  tox1c1ty  have  not   been
Investigated sufficiently.   Confidence  In  the  key study Is low  because only
one  dosage  level  was   tested,  hlstopathologlc  examination  was   limited  and
dosing was not precisely  controlled.  Because  of  the support  provided  by the
NTP  (1980a,b)  and Shopp  et  al.  (1984) studies, confidence  1n  the RfOQ  1s
rated medium.   Naphthalene  1s currently listed  as  under  review by the RfD
workgroup.
    U.S.  EPA (1986a) derived a  CS for  naphthalene from the subchronlc  NTP
(1980a) gavage  study.   Hlstopathologlc  lesions were observed In  the kidneys
of  male  rats  treated  with  200   mg/kg,  5 days/week  (143  mg/kg/day).   An
uncertainty  factor  of  10  was  applied  to  expand from subchronlc to chronic
exposure.   From  an  estimated  rat  body weight  of  0.31  kg,  a  human MED  of
164.4 mg/day was calculated, which corresponds   to  an RV.  of  2.2.   An  RV
of 6 was chosen to represent the  kidney lesions  and the  CS was calculated as
13.2.  This CS  1s adopted for the  purposes  of  this document.
0014H                               -13-                             05/20/88

-------
6.2.2.   Inhalation  (RfOj).   Data  regarding  chronic  exposure  to  naphtha-
lene by Inhalation were not  located  In  the  available  literature.   NTP (1987)
1s currently examining the effects of 10  and  30  ppm naphthalene on mice 1n a
2-year Inhalation study (see Section  6.3.2.).
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q.,*)
6.3.1.   Oral.    Naphthalene  has  not  been  adequately   tested   1n  animal
bloassays; therefore,  1t  Is  not possible to  derive a q,* for  oral  exposure
to naphthalene.
6.3.2.   Inhalation.   The  lack  of  pertinent data  regarding  the cardnogen-
1c1ty of  Inhaled naphthalene precludes  assessment of carcinogenic  potency.
NTP  (1987)  1s  currently  examining the  effects  of 10 and  30 ppm  naphthalene
on  mice  In a  2-year  Inhalation  study.   Preliminary  results   have  been
submitted to the EPA, and upon  peer  review by  the NTP  Board  of  Scientific
Counselors,  the EPA will evaluate the results  to  determine 1f  any  changes  In
the current  regulatory assessment are warranted (U.S.  EPA,  1988).
0014H                               -14-                             05/20/88

-------
                                7.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986a.
Threshold Limit  Values for Chemical  Substances and  Physical  Agents  In  the
Workroom Environment Adopted by ACGIH.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 25.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Documentation of  the Threshold Limit  Values  and  Biologic  Exposure  Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 420.

Adklns, B.,  Jr.,  E.W.  Van Stee, J.E. Simmons  and  S.L.  Eustls.   1986.   Onco-
gen 1c  response  of  strain A/J mice  to  Inhaled  chemicals.    0.   Toxlcol.
Environ. Health.   17: 311-322.

Anzlulewlcz,  3.A.,  H.J.   D1ck  and  E.E.   ChlarulH.   1959.  Transplacental
naphthalene  poisoning.   Am.  J. Obstet.  Gynecol.   78:  519-521.   (Cited  In
U.S. EPA, 1983)

Bock, K.W.,  U.C.  Clausbruch and D. Wlnne.  1979.  Absorption and metabolism
of naphthalene  and benzo(a)pyrene  In  the rat  jejunum In situ.  Med.  Blol.
57: 262-264.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1986b)

Bogdat'eva,   A.G.   and  O.Y. Bid.    1955.   Effect  of   high  molecular  weight
products of  pyrolysls  of  petroleum on the animal  organisms.  (CHed  In U.S.
EPA, 1980a)
0014H                               -15-                             08/27/87

-------
Boyland, E.,  et al.   1964.   Further  experiments  on Implantation  of  mate-
rials Into the urinary bladder of mice.  Br. 0. Cancer.  18: 575.   (CHed In
U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Callahan,  M.A.,  H.W.  SUmak,  N.W.  Gabel,  et  al.    1979.   Water-Related
Environmental  Fate  of  129  Priority  Pollutants. Vol.  II.   Office  of  Water
Planning and  Standards,  Office  of  Water and  Waste Management.   U.S.  EPA,
Washington, DC.   EPA 440/4-79-029b.

Chusld,  E.  and C.T. Fried.  1955.  Acute hemolytlc anemia due to naphthalene
1ngest1on.   Am.  J.  01s. Child.  89: 612-614.   (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Correa,   M.  and  B.J.  Venables.   1985.   Bloconcentratlon of  naphthalene  In
tissues  of  the white mullet  (Muq11 cureroa).  Environ. Tox. Chem.  4: 227-231.

FHzhugh, O.G.  and  W.H.  Buschke.  1949.  Production of  cataract  In rats  by
betatetralol  and  other  derivatives  of  naphthalene.    Arch.  Opthal.   41:
572-582.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1983)

Freeman, A.E., et  al.  1973.   Transformation  of cell  cultures as an Indica-
tion of  the carcinogenic  potential of chemicals.  3. Natl. Cancer Inst.  51:
799-807.  (CHed 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a,  1982)

Ghettl,   G.  and  L.  MaManl.   1956.   Eye changes due  to naphthalene.   Med.
Lav.  47: 533-538.   (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA,  1980a,  1983)
0014H                               -16-                            04/20/88

-------
Gross,  R.T.,  et al.   1958.   An hereditary  enzymatic  defect 1n  erythrocyte
metabolism: G1ucose-6-phosphate  dehydrogenase  deficiency.   J. CUn.  Invest.
37: 1176-1184.  (CHed 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Haggerty,  R.J.   1956.   Toxic hazards:  Naphthalene  poisoning.  New Engl.  J.
Med.  255: 919-920.  (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Hansch,  C. and  A.O.  Leo.    1985.   Medchem Project  Issue  No.  26.   Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hardln,  B.D.,  G.P.  Bond,  H.R.  S1kov,  P.O. Andrew,  R.P.   Bellies  and R.W.
N1eme1r.   1981.    Testing  of Selected  Workplace Chemicals  for   teratogenlc
Potential.  Scand.  J. Work Environ. Health.   7  suppl. 466-475.

Harden, R.A. and A.M.  Baetjer.   1978.   Aplastlc anemia following  exposure  to
paradlchlorobenzene and  naphthalene.   3.  Occup.  Med.   20: 820-822.   (Cited
1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Kennaway,  E.L.   1930.    LVII.  Further   experiments  on  cancer-producing sub-
stances.  Blochem.  J.  24:  497.   (CHed  In  U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Kennaway,  E.L.  and  I.  Helger.    1930.   Carcinogenic  substances  and their
fluorescence spectra.  Br.  Med.  J.   1:  1044.   (CHed  1n U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Knake,  E.   1956.   Uber schwache geschwulsterzengende wlrkung von naphthalln
and  benzol.   Vlrchows  Archlv.  Pathol.  Anat.  Physio!.  329:  141.    (Ger.)
(CHed In U.S. EPA, 1986a)


0014H                               -17-                            05/20/88

-------
Kraemer, M.,  et al.   1974.   S.  typhlmurlum and £.  coll  to detect  chemical
mutagens.  Arch. Pharmacol.   284:  R46.   (Cited  1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a,  1982)

MacKay,  D.,  A.  Bobra, W.Y.  Shin  and  S.H.  Yalkowsky.   1980.   Relationships
between  aqueous   solubility  and   octanol-water   partition   coefficients.
Chemosphere.  9: 701-711.

MacKay, D., A.  Bobra, O.W. Chan and W.Y.  Shin.  1982.   Vapor pressure  corre-
lations  of  low-volatility environmental  chemicals.   Environ.  Sc1.  Techno!.
16: 645-649.

Matorova, N.N.  and O.N.  ChetveMkova.   1981.   Embryotoxlc  and teratogenlc
effect  of  naphthalene and  chloronaphthalene.   Sb. Nauch.  Tr.  VNII Glgeny.
12: 62-65.   (English translation)   (Cited  1n U.S. EPA,  1986a)

McCann,  J., et  al.   1975.   Detection of  carcinogens as  mutagens  1n  the
Salmonella/mlcrosome test.   Assay  of  300  chemicals.   Proc.  Natl. Acad. Scl.
72: 5135-5139.   (Cited 1n  U.S. EPA,  1980a, 1982)

Mortelmans,  K., S.  Haworth, T.  Lawlor,  et al.   1986.   Mutagenlclty test
results.  II. Results  from  the  testing of 270  chemicals.   Environ.  Mutagen.
8: 1-39.  (CUed 1n U.S.  EPA, 1986a)

Nash,  L.F.   1903.   Naphthalene  poisoning.  Br. Med.  3.  1: 251.   (Cited  In
U.S. EPA, 1980a)

NLM  (National  Library of Medicine).   1987.  Hazardous Substance Data Base.
Record No.  184.

0014H                               -18-                             05/20/88

-------
NTP (National  Toxicology  Program).   1980a.  Unpublished subchronlc  toxldty
study:  Naphthalene  (C52904),   Fischer  344  rats.   Prepared  by  Battelle's
Columbus Laboratories under Subcontract  No. 76-34-106002.   March  4,  1980.

NTP (National  Toxicology  Program).   1980b.  Unpublished subchronlc  toxldty
study:  Naphthalene  (C52904),  66C3F1 mice.   Prepared  by Battelle's  Columbus
Laboratories under Subcontract  No.  76-34-106002.   March  4,  1980.

NTP (National  Toxicology  Program).   1987.  Management Status Report.   Dated
01/09/87.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety and  Health Administration).   1985.  OSHA  Occupa-
tional Standards, Permissible Exposure Limits.   29 CFR 1910.1000.

Plasterer, M.R., W.S. Bradshaw, G.M. Booth and M.M. Carter.   1985.   Develop-
mental  toxldty  of  nine  selected  compounds following  prenatal  exposure  In
the mouse:  Naphthalene,  p-nHrophenol, sodium selenHe, dimethyl  phthalate,
ethylene  thlourea  and four glycol  ether  derivatives.   J.  Toxlcol.  Environ.
Health.  15: 25-38.

Rh1m,   3.S., et  al.   1974.   Evaluation  of an  ±n  vitro  assay  system for
carcinogens based  on prior  Infection of  rodent  cells  with  nontransformlng
RNA tumor virus.  J. Natl. Cancer Inst.   52: 1167-1173.  (Cited  1n  U.S. EPA,
1982)

Sabljlc,  A.   1984.   Predictions of  the nature and  strength of  sorptlon  of
organic pollutants by molecular  topology.   J. Agrlc.  Food Chem.   32:  243-246.


0014H                                -19-                             04/20/88

-------
Sanborn, H.R.  and  D.C.  Mallns.  1977.   Tox1c1ty  and metabolism of  naphtha-
lene: A  study  with  marine  larval  Invertebrates.   Proc. Soc. Exp.  81ol.  Med.
154: 151-155.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

Schmahl, D.   1955.   Testing  of maphthalene and  anthracene as  carcinogenic
agents  In  the  rat.   Z.  Krebsforsch.    60:  697-710.   (German  with  English
translation)   (Cited 1n  U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Schmeltz, I., et al.  1978.  Bloassays of naphthalene  and alkyl  naphthalenes
for  co-carcinogenic activity.   Relation  to  tobacco  cardnocjenesls.    Jjn:
Cardnogenesls, Vol. 3:  Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons,  P.  Jones and  I.
Freudenthal,  Ed.  Raven  Press,  NY.   p.  47-60.   (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1980a)

Shopp,  G.M.,  K.I.  White,  Jr., H.P.  Holsapple,  et  al.   1984.  Naphthalene
toxlclty In CD-I mice: General  toxicology and 1mmunotox1cology.  Fund. Appl.
Toxlcol.  4(3, Pt.  1): 406-419.

Slna, J.F., C.L. Bean, G.R. Dysart  et  al.  1983.   Evaluation of  the  alkaline
elutlon/rat  hepatocyte   assay  as  a  predictor   of  carclnogenlc/mutagenlc
potential.   Mutat.  Res.   113(5): 357-391.  (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA,  1986a)

Summer, K.H., K. Rozman, F. Coulston and H. Grelm.   1979.   Urinary excretion
of  mercapturlc  adds In chimpanzees  and  rats.   Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.
50: 207-212.

Talakln,  Yu.N.   1966.   San1tary-tox1colog1cal  characteristics  of  a-naph-
thoqulnone.  Vop.  Kommunal.  G1g.  6: 37-43.   (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA,  1980a)

0014H                               -20-                              04/20/88

-------
TonelH, Q.,  et  al.   1979.   Transformation of cultured  mouse  mammary glands
by  aromatic  amines  and  amides  and  their  derivatives.   Cancer  Res.   39:
1784-1792.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a, 1982)

Tsuda, H.,  G. Lee and  E.  Faber.   1980.   Induction  of  resistant hepatocytes
as a  new principle for  a  possible short-term Jj»  vivo  test for carcinogens.
Cancer Res.  40(4): 1157-1164.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1986a)

U.S.  EPA.   1980a.  Ambient Water  Quality Criteria  for Naphthalene.   Prepared
by the Office of  Health and  Environmental Assessment, Environmental  Criteria
and Assessment  Office,   Cincinnati, OH  for the  Office  of  Water  Regulations
and Standards, Washington, DC.  EPA-440/4-80-059.  NTIS PB 81-117707.

U.S.  EPA.   1980b.  Guidelines  and Methodology  Used In  the  Preparation  of
Health  Effects Assessment  Chapters   of  the  Ambient  Water  Quality  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.  45: 49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1982.   Revision   and  Update  of Hazard  Profile on  Naphthalene.
Prepared by the Office  of Health  and  Environmental Assessment, Environmental
Criteria and  Assessment  Office, Cincinnati, OH for the  Office  of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response,  Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1983.   Reportable  Quantity Document for Naphthalene.   Prepared  by
the Office of Health  and Environmental  Assessment, Environmental  Criteria
and Assessment  Office, Cincinnati,  OH  for  the   Office  of  Emergency  and
Remedial Response, Washington, DC.
0014H                               -21-                             04/20/88

-------
U.S. EPA.   1984.   Methodology and Guidelines for  Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations Based on  Chronic  Toxlclty  Data.  Prepared by  the  Office of Health
and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment  Office,
Cincinnati, OH  for  the Office of  Solid Waste and  Emergency  Response,  Wash-
ington, DC.

U.S. EPA.  1986a.   Health and  Environmental  Effects Profile  for Naphthalene.
Prepared by the Office  of Health  and  Environmental Assessment,  Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for  the  Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Summary  Review  for  Health  Effects  Associated  with
Naphthalene: Health Issue Assessment.   Prepared  by the Office  of  Health and
Environmental  Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,
Research  Triangle  Park,  NC  for  the  Office  of  A1r   Quality  Planning  and
Standards and the Office of  Air and Radiation,  Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.    Guidelines   for  Carcinogen   Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  52(185): 33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.  1988.   Assessment  of Naphthalene  as  a Potentially  Toxic  Air
Pollutant.  Federal Register.  53(54): 9138-9141.

Valaes,  T.,  et al.   1963.   Acute hemolysls  due  to naphthalene Inhalation.
J. Ped.  63: 904-915.    (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)
0014H                               -22-                             04/20/88

-------
Van der Hoeve, J.   1906.   Choreoret1n1t1s  be 1m menschen durch die e1nw1rk1ng
von naphthalln.   Arch. Augenhellk.   56:  259.   (Ger.)   (Cited In  U.S.  EPA,
1980a, 1983)

Van der  Hoeve,  J.  1913.   Wlrkung von naphthol auf die  augen von menschen,
tleren,  und auf  fatale augen.   Graele Arch.  Ophthal.   85: 305.   (Ger.)
(Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

Van Heynlngen,  R. and  A.  P1r1e.   1976.   Naphthalene  cataract  In  plgmented
and albino rabbits.  Exp. Eye Res.  22: 393-394.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA, 1983)

Wolf,  0.  1976.   Cancer diseases  In chemical  workers  1n a former naphthalene
cleaning plant.   Oeutche Gesundheltwesen.   31:  996-999.   (Cited  1n  U.S.  EPA,
1980a, 1986a)

Zlnkham, M.J.  and B.  Chllds.   1958.   A defect of  glutathlone metabolism  1n
erythrocytes  from  patients  with  a   naphthalene-Induced  hemolytlc  anemia.
Pediatrics.  22:  461-471.  (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA, 1983)

Zoeteman, B.C.J., K. Harmsen, J.B.H.J.  Llnders,  C.F. H.  Morra and W. Slooff.
1980.   Persistent  organic  pollutants  1n river  water  and groundwater of  the
Netherlands.  Chemosphere.   9: 231-249.

Zuelzer, W.H. and  L.  Apt.   1949.  Acute hemolytlc  anemia  due to naphthalene
poisoning.   J. Am. Meek Assoc.  141: 185-190.   (Cited 1n U.S.  EPA, 1980a)
0014H                               -23-                             04/20/88

-------
                  0>
                  u
                  0>

                  O  00
                  u
                  e  t.
                  o>
u.
o
bO
               «B 3  >»
               *rf I/I  (B
               e o v
               0> CkV.
               S x  o»
4, jj  Bj

CL f»  S
X 0 —
                  IS)


                  u
                                                                         un
                                                                           00
                                                                           Of
                                                                                       a   •
                                                                                       CO <
                                                                                        a.
                                                                         J»


                                                                         1
                                                                         JC
                                                             u          u
                                                                       00
                                                                            bO
                                                             (M
                                                                         CM
                                                                        CM

                                                                        CO



                                                                         II

                                                                        CO
                                                                                        >» e \o
                                                                                        O)  O  II
                                                                                        c —  a;
                                               o>

                                               o
                                                          O t/» >»
                                                          XJ >» «B
                                                             IB -O
fQ    9^    TI    w^

o a >v    "o a x.


-""*    I"1"
^7* ^m       ^7* ^M
   0) r—       0> i—
a > ^    a > ^
r- O —    i— O —
 >» O .X
 IQ U. -V. —.
•W    O»CM
   a> s  •
kO O»   Csl
   «B CO
  • > '*•  II
 ^^ ^ i^™


•x >» v» ae
 g>^ >»^-
 E     -~
a »
o o a  B
                                                                                                          B
                                                                                                          0)


                                                                                                          U
                                             II

                                            a
OOUH
                                      -24-
                                                                                                     04/20/88

-------