EPA

 j *S 2
 S3 §
 G 5 *••
  So*
 o 2 «
 P •§ «
         !.•<.,„! Ct-
              •tion
             i'1 'pment
          Office of Health and Ecological
          Effects
          Washington DC 20460
EPA-600/9-78-009
June 1978
Carbon Disulfide,
Carbonyl Sulfide

Literature Review
and Environmental
Assessment

-------
                RESEARCH  REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development  U S  Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology Elimination of traditional grouping was  consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields
The nine series are
      1   Environmental Health Effects Research
      2   Environmental Protection Technology
      3   Ecological Research
      4   Environmental Monitoring
      5   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6   Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7   Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8    'Special  Reports
      9   Miscellaneous Reports
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service. Springfield, Virginia 22161

-------
Final Report
                 Do not remove. This document
                 should be retained in the EPA
                 Region 5 Library Collection.
                      January 1976
     CARBON  DISULFIDE, CARBONYL SULFIDE
Literature  Review  and Environmental  Assessment
                            By:

                       THOMAS O. PEYTON
                       ROBERT V. STEELE
                OPERATIONS EVALUATION DEPARTMENT

                       WILLIAM R. MABEY
                   PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
            TECHNICAL MONITOR
              ALAN CARLIN
PROJECT OFFICER
 ALBERT PINES
                 Contract No. 68-01-2940, Task 023

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and Development, EPA, and
approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and  policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does  mention of
trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This document is  available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, VA. 22151.

-------
Final Report
                 Do not remove. This document
                 should be retained in the EPA
                 Region 5 Library Collection.
                                                      January 1976
     CARBON  DISULFIDE,  CARBONYL SULFIDE
Literature  Review  and  Environmental  Assessment
                             By:

                       THOMAS 0 PEYTON
                       ROBERT V. STEELE
                OPERATIONS EVALUATION DEPARTMENT

                       WILLIAM R. MABEY
                   PHYSICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
            TECHNICAL MONITOR
              ALAN CARLIN
                                PROJECT OFFICER
                                  ALBERT PINES
                 Contract No. 68-01-2940, Task 023
                         Prepared for:

              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                    WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20460
                         OLrl t-. $ & v. ^s

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


This report has been reviewed by the Office  of  Research and Development, EPA, and
approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and  policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention  of
trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, VA. 22151.

-------
                                CONTENTS







LIST OF TABLES	     -jv





I    INTRODUCTION 	       1





II   SUMMARY	       2





III  LITERATURE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT 	       3



     Chemical and Physical Properties 	       3



     Environmental Exposure Factors 	      12



     Estimates of Ambient Air Concentrations  	      23



     Health and Welfare Effects 	      35



     Environmental Quality Aspects  	      50





REFERENCES    	      51
                                  m

-------
                               TABLES
 1   Physical  and  Chemical Properties of C$2 	     3
 2   Physical  and  Chemical Properties of COS 	     4
 3   Estimated One-Hour Ambient  Inversion Concentrations of CS2
     and COS at Various Distances  from a Hypothetical Array of
     Sulfur Recovery Plants   	    26

 4   California Total Primary Energy Supply: 1971  	    29
 5   California Sales of Heating Oils  	    29

 6   California Sales of Distillate-Type Fuel Oils and Average
     Sulfur Content:  1973	    31
 7   California Sales of Residual-Type Fuel Oils and Average
     Sulfur Content:  1974	    31

 8   Los Angeles SMSA Sales  of Gasoline and Average Sulfur
     Content:   1974	    32

 9   Total Sulfur  Consumption and  Emission and Estimated Conversion
     to COS and CS2	    33
10   Summary of Source Contribution to Estimated Ambient
     Stagnation Levels 	    34
11   Lethal Doses  of  CS2 and COS (Inhalation)	    41
                                  IV

-------
                            I  INTRODUCTION








     This report, prepared for  the Environmental Protection Agency under




Contract No. 68-01-2940, Task 023,  is subsidiary to the primary task of




ranking ten hazardous substances/agents for the EPA by the STAR Ranking




Objective Subsystem.  The purpose of this supplemental report is to




provide information that will allow the EPA to know the tolerable con-



centrations of carbon disulfide and carbonyl sulfide in the ambient air.

-------
                             II  SUMMARY








     Carbon disulfide (€82) and carbonyl sulfide (COS) are volatile sub-



stances of moderate toxicity, odor,  and environmental lifetimes (days).



Vapors emitted from sources are expected to follow normal atmospheric



dispersion principles.  Each compound is produced from anthropogenic as



well as natural sources.  The most significant anthropogenic emission



for CS2 is from commercial usages where the atmosphere serves as the



natural sink.  The use of nonselective reducing catalysts may emit sig-



nificant quantities of COS.  Little is known of the toxic thresholds for



COS; however, the significant industrial usage of CSo has provided ap-



preciable industrial hygiene records on effects.  Based on industrial



effects records, and until better data on chronic exposures become avail-



able, we tentatively recommend that limiting long-term averaged concen-



trations to 300 (J:g/m^ CS2 should be sufficient for protection against



adverse health effects.  By chemical and biological analogy to CS-, the



corresponding level for COS would be 400

-------
                 Ill  LITERATURE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT


Chemical and Physical Properties

     General Characteristics

          Carbon Disulfide

          Carbon disulfide  (CS~) is a colorless volatile liquid of mod-

erate  solubility in water,  with a partition coefficient of about 100

(octanol/water) (CRC, 1971 ;* Leo et  al., 1971^).  Using the rate of evapora-

tion approximation and assigned parameters as developed by Mackay and

Wolkoff  (1973),  the half-life  for evaporation from a saturated water

solution is 11 minutes.  Some  of the physical and chemical properties of

CSo are  given in Table 1.

                               Table 1

                PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF CS2


             Molecular weight:         76.13
             Specific gravity:         1.26 (20°C)
             Melting point:            -108.6°C
             Boiling point:            46.3 C
             Vapor density:            2.63 (air = 1)
             Vapor pressure:           360 mm Hg (25^C)
             Solubility:                2.2 g/liter of water
             1 mg/m3 =0.32 ppm
             1 ppm   = 3.12 mg/m3
*
 CRC (1971), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Chemical Rubber Company,
 Cleveland,  Ohio).

 Leo, A., C. Hansch,  and D.  Elkins (1971),  "Partition Coefficients and
 Their Uses," Chem. Rev., Vol.  71, No. 6.

 Mackay, D., and A. W. Wolkoff (1973), "Rate  of Evaporation of Low Solubility
 Contaminants from Water Bodies to Atmosphere," Environ. Sci. Tech. , Vol.  7,
 p. 611.

-------
          CS„ is a linear molecule and has the structural representation

                                S = C = S                           (1)

          Carbonyl Sulfide

          Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is a colorless flammable gas of moderate

solubility in water.   It is 16 times more soluble in alcohol and 30 times
                                                   j*
more soluble in toluene than in water (Patty, 1963)/  The chemistry of

COS has been reviewed by Perm (1957).  Some of the physical and chemical

properties of COS are given in Table 2.

                               Table 2

               PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF COS
               Molecular weight:           60.07
               Specific gravity, Gas:      2.1 (air = 1)
               Density, liquid  (-87°C):    1.24 g/ml
               Vapor pressure (21°C):      9032 mm Hg
               Melting point (1 atm):      -139°C
               Boiling point (1 atm):      -50.2°C
               1 mg/m3 =0.41 ppm (1 atm, 25°C)
               1 ppm   =2.5 mg/m3  (1 atm, 25°C)
          COS is a linear molecule and has the structural representation
                            0 = C = S                                (2)

     Chemical Reactions

          Carbon Disulfide

          Synthesis—CSp is an industrially important organic chemical

(Austin, 1974).  Its production is limited to a vapor-phase reaction

from methane and sulfur:
 Patty, F. A. (1963), Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 2nd ed.,  Vol. 2
 (Wiley Interscience,  New York,  New York).
 Ferm, R. J. (1957), "The Chemistry of Carbonyl Sulfide, Chem. Rev..
 Vol. 57, p. 621.

-------
                     activated A1.203,


            CH4 + 4S 	700°C, 25 psi




 Hydrogen (HoS)  sulfide  is  reconverted  to  sulfur by the  Glaus process and


 recycled.   An older process  reacted surfur with wood charcoal in either


 a retort or an electric furnace.



           In the reaction  furnace of Glaus plants  for sulfur recovery


 systems, CS2 is produced from COS and  H2S:




                        COS +  H S	—  2H  S +  CS                     (4)




 and  from methane and  sulfur:
                        CH  +  4S 	— 2H S  +  CS                       (5)
                          4              22
 Levels  as  high  as  5000  ppm for both  COS  and  CS2  have  been encountered in


 the  tail  gas  of Glaus plants;  values ranging from 700-1500 ppm are  more


 common.



           An  old process  for  the  production  of carbon tetrachloride used


 CS2  and chlorine with an  iron catalyst at  ambient temperatures.   Dithio-


 carbamates can  result from reacting  CS2  with ammonia  (Austin,  1974):




                        CS,, +  2NH,,	— H NCSSNH,      .               (6)
                          23        24



           CS  has  been  detected in  the magtnatic  gas  over volcanoes

               t
(Nordlie, 1971),   during  the aging  of  roasted  coffee (Radtke et  al.,  1963),
 Austin, G. T.  (1974), "The Industrially Significant Organic Chemicals--

 Part 2," Chem. Eng., p. 127  (February 18, 1974).


 Nordlie, B. E. (1971), "The Composition of the Magmatic Gas of Kilauea

 and Its Behavior in the Near Surface Environment," Am. J. Sci., Vol.  271,

 p. 417.

*
 Radtke, R.. et al.,   (1963) The Chemical Processes During the Aging of

 Roasted Coffee," Z. Lebensn. Untersuch. Forsch., Vol. 119, p.  293.


                                    5

-------
                                                                     •
during the pressure cooking of grain-water mixtures (Ronkainen,  1973),   as

a volatile constituent in the vapor of burning cigarettes (ORNL, 1975),

and in the vapor space above liquid sulfur (Pickren and Matson,  1964).
          Decomposition—CSp is stable to hydrolysis in the pH region of
environmental concern (pH = 4 to 10).   Hydrolysis of carbon disulfide to
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide is a two-step process with carbonyl
sulfide as an intermediate product:


                       CS2 + H20	— COS + H2S                      (7)

                       COS + H20	— C02 + H2S                      (8)
                                      C02 + 2H2S                     (9)
At pH = 13 (0.1 N NaOH) CS2 has a half-life of about 1 hour at 25°C.

Extrapolation of this value to pH = 9 gives a half-life of 1.1 years.
In basic solution, the carbon dioxide is converted to bicarbonate

(COn + OH" - »-HCOo~), which precludes reversibility of the reaction.
The electrophilic character of CS? does, however, provide for scrubbing
and analytical techniques utilizing more nucleophilic reagents (amines

and heterogeneous catalysts).

          The flammability limits of CS2 are 1 percent to 50 percent by
volume in air, posing an acute fire and explosion hazard at high concen-
trations  (flash point is -30°C).  The oxidation has been studied
 "Ronkainen, P.  (1973),  "Formation of Volatile Sulfur Compounds During Pres-
  sure  Cooking  of Grain-Water Mixtures," J.  Inst. Brew., London, Vol. 79,
  No.  3,  p.  200.

  ORNL  (1975),  "ORNL Tobacco Smoke Research Program Summary Report," Oak
  Ridge National Laboratory, March 1975.

  Pickren, R.A., and R. F. Matson (1964), "Chromatograph Aboard a Liquid
  Sulfur  Ship," Chem. Eng. Progr., Vol. 62, No. 2, p. 95.

-------
 for these as well as for theoretical purposes concerning the intermediate

 species in these reactions (Wood and Heicklen, 1971a)."  Reports on the

 reaction with ozone and on photooxidation have also been made.  The

 rate constant for the reaction of CS2 with an oxygen atom is 5.6 X 10"

 (M-sec)   at 25°C as calculated from the Arrhenius expression as obtained

 by Westenberg and DeHaas (1969).
                                      j.
           Olszyna and Heicklen (1970)  have reported on the reaction of

 ozone with CSo.  The yields of products (normalized to initial ozone

 concentration) are 0.85 02, 0.36 S02, 0.16 OCS,  0.10 CO, and 0.03 C02-

           Wood and Heicklen (1971b,  1973/74)  have reported photooxidation

 studies of CS2 at 2139 A and 3130 A.   DeSorgo and coworkers  (1965)  have

 also investigated this process.   Photolysis at wavelengths less  than
      o
 2300 A  proceeds in part by dissociation of the photoexcited species

 (CS2*)  to CS  and a sulfur atom:


                            CS2	-CS2*                            (10)


                           CS2*	— DS  + S                          (11)
 "Wood,  W. P., and J. Heicklen (1971a),  "Kinetics and Mechanism of the Carbon
  Disulfide Oxygen Explosion," J.  Phys.  Chem.,  Vol.  75,  p.  861.
  Westenberg, A. A., and N.  DeHaas  (1969),  "Atom-Molecule Kinetics Using
  ESR Detection, V Results  for 0 + OCS,  0  + CS2, 0 + N02 and H + C2H4,"
  J.  Chem.  Phys.,  Vol 50,  p.  707.

  Olszyna,  K. J., and J. Heicklen (1970), The Reaction of Ozone with Carbon
  Disulfide," J. Phys.  Chem.,  Vol.  74,  p.  4188.
 6
  Wood,  W. P., and J. Heicklen (1971b),  "The Photooxidation  of Carbon Disul-
  sulfide," J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 75,  p.  85.

  Wood,oW. P., and J. Heicklen (1973/74), The Photooxidation of CS2 at
  2139 1,"  J. Photochem., Vol.  2,  p.  173.
ft
  DeSorgo, M., et al.,  (1965),  "The  Photolysis  of Carbon  Disulfide and
  Carbon-Oxygen Mixtures,"  Can.  J.  Chem.,  Vol.  43,  p.  1886.

                                    7

-------
In the presence of oxygen the products are CO, COS, SC>2, $20, and possibly



SO-j.   No carbon dioxide is found.  At wavelengths greater than 2300 A




(lower energy) photodissociation does not occur.  The mechanism is then




the reaction of the photoexcited CS2 with oxygen or itself:








                   cs2" + o2	— cs + soo (-so2)                   (12)







                  CS2" + CS2	- 2CS + S2    .                      (13)








An excited-state quenching process with 02 was also in evidence:








                       CS2* + 02	- CS2 + 02   .                   (14)








          The photooxidation study at 3130 A  is relevant to  environmental




conditions as this wavelength is within the solar spectrum.  The products




of the reaction were CO, COS,  S0~,  and polymer  [see Eqs. (15) and (16)]




(Wood and Heicklen, 1971b).  Carbon dioxide and SO-, were not found as




products.  Quantum yields of products were small and ranged  from 3 X 10




to 10" l.
                    CS2  + °2	"" CS2 + °2
                                   CS + SOO (-SO  )                  (15)
                      CS + 0 	— COS + 0
                                   CO + SO (-SO  )      .              (16)
The product ratio COS/CO was found to be approximately 1:2 with a good




carbon-sulfur mass balance for the gaseous products.





          The information available indicates that CS2 is relatively per-




sistent in the atmosphere.  Atmospheric oxidation of CS  will produce SO ,

-------
COS, and CO.  In the absence of a direct measure of an environmental half-

life for CS ,  we make the following estimates:

          •  Oxygen atom reaction.  Modeling for atmospheric
             chemistry suggests that the oxygen atom is an
             important species which results from the photolysis
             of ozone and/or nitrogen dioxide among other sources
             (Demerjian et al., 1974)."  If we assume an ambient
             steady-state concentration of oxygen atoms as
             4 x 10"9 ppm (1.2 x 1CT16 M), the  half-life for
             CS2 at 25°C is approximately 12 days.
          •  Ozone reaction.  The data of Olszyna and Heicklen
             (1970) are not amenable to an environmental predic-
             tion.  The unusual kinetic expression,  as reported
             in the cited paper, has been explained as being due
             to aerosol formation in the experimental work
             (J.  Heicklen,  personal communication,  1975).  Since
             the CS2 concentrations in the experiment were in
             excess of 1300 ppm and the ozone concentration, the
             potential for aerosol formation under environmental
             conditions is not certain.

          •  Photooxidation of CSn.  To approximate the photo-
             oxidation of CS^ some evaluation of the specific
             absorption rate constant at 3130 A is needed
             (Leighton, 1961).  Correcting the  value for the
             S02 photooxidation study of Allen,  McQuigg and
             Cadle (1972)* to that for CS2 at this wavelength
             (extinction coefficient ~ 50 M   sec  )  (Trieber
             et al.,  1957),3 a specific absorption rate con-
             stant of 0.93  day"^ is obtained.   Taking the
             maximum quantum yield of 10   from the  work of
             Wood and Heicklen (1971b),  a mean  lifetime of
             130 hours is calculated,  corresponding  to 11 days
             when assuming  12 hours of sunlight  per  day.
*
 Demerjian, K. L•,  J- A. Kerr.  and J.  G.  Calver (1974).  "The Mechanism of
 Photochemical Smog Formation," Adv.  Environ. Sci. Tech.. Vol. 4, p. 1.
t
 Leighton, P. A.  (1961),  Photochemistry of Air Pollution (Academic Press,
 New York, New York).
 Allen, E. R., R.  D. McQuigg and R. D. Cadle (1972),  "The Photooxidation
 of Sulfur Dioxide in Air,  Chemosphere.  Vol. 1. p. 25.
fi
'Treiber,  E.  et al., (1957). "UV and  IR-Absorption von Kohlenstoffdise-
 lenid," Acta Chem. Scand..  Vol. 11,  p.  752.

-------
             Taking the minimum quantum yield value (3 x 10  ),
             the mean lifetime is 10 years for 12 hours of sun-
             light per day.

          Thus photooxidation may be a contributing or insignificant

process in the degradation of 082 in the atmosphere.  The uncertainty
arises from both the limits of the experimental work reported (quantum

yields, reactant concentrations, quenching effects, and the like) as well

as the climatological conditions of any subject area.


          Carbonyl Sulfide

          Synthesis--COS is prepared by the action of oxidizing agents
on CS? and as a by-product during the preparation of C$2 from carbonaceous

matter and SC^.  It may be formed by heating oxides of carbon with sulfur,

or by the action of carbonyl chloride on  sulfides.  Ferm (1957) reviews

the various methods of synthesis.  In the Glaus reaction furnace, CC>2

reacts with IS:
                       CO  + H S 	— HO + COS     .                (17)
Equations  (7) and  (16) indicate that COS is a natural decomposition prod-

uct of CS_ in the  environment.

           In a similar manner to CS2, COS is produced in a variety of

natural environs.  It emanates from cattle manure at concentrations up

to 3 ppm  for several days  (Elliot and Travis, 1973),* from volcanic fuma-
                                                    4-
roles at  temperatures exceeding 400° C (Momot, 1964),  during the cooking
 Elliot, L. F., and T. A. Travis  (1973), "Detection of Carbonyl Sulfide
 and Other Gases Emanating from Beef Cattle Manure," Soil Sci. Soc, Am.
 Proc., Vol. 37, p. 700

 Momot, J.  (1964), "Carbonyl Sulfide, a Product of the Activity of Vol-
 canic Fumaroles," Bull. Mens.  Soc. Linneenne Lyon, Vol. 33, No. 8, p. 326,

                                    10

-------
of grain-water mixtures (Ronkainen, 1973), and as a volatile component

in tobacco combustion (ORNL, 1975).  It is probable that most carbonaceous

combustion processes involving sulfur compounds emit COS directly, as well

as indirectly from biological production of l^S,  which further reacts with

CO and C02 to produce COS.


          Decomposition--COS is an intermediate in the hydrolysis of CS2

as previously discussed.  The half-life at pH = 12 (0.01 N KOH) is about
                                              JU
three minutes at 22°C (Galivets et al., 1972)."  Extrapolation to pH = 9

gives a half-life of about 2 days.  At pH = 8 the half-life would be ap-

proximately 20 days.  Its decomposition rate is more rapid than the hydro-

lysis of CS2 under similar conditions.  In 19 percent ethanol solvent,

COS reacts some 1000 times faster than CS£ in alkaline hydrolysis (Philipp

and Dautzenberg, 1966).  A more detailed study on the alkaline hydrolysis

of COS has also been reported by these authors (Philipp and Dauzenberg,

1965).

          We found no photooxidation studies on COS or reports on reaction

with ozone in the chemical literature.  The rate of oxygen atom reaction

with COS at 25°C as calculated from the work of Westenberg and DeHaas (1969)
           Q         _ ^
is 6.9 x 10  (M - sec)   .  Calculation at the same temperature based on the

expression of Wood and Heicklen (1971b; 1973/1974) gives a rate constant

of 3.6 x 108 (M - sec)"1:


                         COS + 0 	— CO + SO      .                 (18)
 Galivets, L. S., Yu.  I. Usatenko,  and D. V. Galivets  (1972),  "Investiga-
 tion  of Kinetics of Alkaline Hydrolysis  of Carbon Bisulfide,"  Soviet
 Chem.  Ind., Vol. 48,  No.  12, p.  730.

 Philipp, B., and H. Dautzenberg  (1965),  "Untersuchungen  zur  Bildung und
 Zersetzung von Monothiocarbonat  in wassriger  Losung,"  Z.  Physik.  Chem.
 (Leipzig), Vol. 229,  p. 210.

                                    11

-------
The volatility of COS and slow hydrolysis at relevant environmental pH
values suggest that COS will be present and gradually degraded in the

atmosphere.  In the absence of other data, an environmental lifetime must
be based on the oxygen atom reaction as previously discussed for CSo.

Again, if we assume a steady-state oxygen atom concentration of 1.2xlO^M

and use the rate constant of Wood and Heicklen (1971b: 1973/1974), we cal-

culate a half-life of 0.5 years.  The value of Westenberg and deHaas
(1969) would predict 0.3 years.

           It has been suggested that COS  elicits a toxic response due to

partial decomposition in the lungs and blood stream  to H?S via hydrolysis
(Patty, 1963).  According to the above rate constants and chemical  reviews
by Perm (1957) this appears to be a relatively slow  reaction at physio-
logical pH.  However, as indicated by Philipp and Dautzenberg  (1966),"^

the hydrolysis of COS is 1000  times faster than CS~  in an ethanol solvent.
Thus,  the  production of t^S in biochemical metabolism seems reasonable.

           It is significant that in coke  oven gas stored for five years
a total disappearance of the 0 , COS, and CS2 occurred.  However, initial
traces of  iron and nickel carbonyl rose  to 1000 mg/m3 and 10 rng/m ,

respectively (Degent et al., 1962).


Environmental Exposure Factors

      Sources and Emissions

           Commercial Production and Emissions

           Carbon Disulfide--In 1974 approximately 350 million  kilograms

of  CS2 were produced  by  five U.S.  manufacturers.  Over  8070  of  the  produc-
tion  of CS2 is used  to make  regenerated  cellulose  rayon  and  cellophane.
 Degent,  C..  C.  Rouse,  and C.  Lebras   (1962).  "Modification  in  Properties
 of  Coke-Oven Gas  During  Underground  Storage,"  Rev.  Combust.,  Vol.  16,
 No.  1,  p.  11.
 t
 Philipp, B., and H. Dautzenberg  (1966),  "Zur  Bildungsgeschwindigkeit  von
 Na-Athylmonothiocarbonat in Vergleich  zu Na-Athylxanthogenat,"  Z.  Physik.
 Chem.  (Leipzig).  Vol.  231, p. 270.
                                   12

-------
In the rayon process CS? is employed as a solvent carrier to form xanthate

crumb from alkali cellulose; tLS and CS  are liberated upon immersion into

acid spinning baths, where the viscose is coagulated and filaments ex-

tracted (Austin, 1974;Davidson and Feinleib, 1972").   The minor inter-
   v
mediate uses of 082 are numerous and include the manufacture of many in-

dustrial chemicals such as thiocarbamates,  xanthates, mercaptans.  thioureas.

and carbon tetrachloride.   Among the many dispersive uses, CS^ is used as

a solvent for oils, waxes, and the flushing of oil casings, and as a

fumigant in pesticide applications (CEH,  1973).

          It is  estimated  that  100 million  kilograms of  industrially

produced CS2 were  emitted  in  the U.S.  to the atmosphere  and approximately

35 million kilograms reached  the water and  land  in  1973  (SRI,  1975).* It

is probable that  the 35 million kilograms deposited  to  land and water

found an eventual  sink  in  the atmosphere due to  the  high volatility of

the compound.


          Carbonyl  Sulfide--Less  than  one thousand  pounds  of COS were

commercially produced  in  the  United  States  in  1973  (Directory  of Chemical

Producers, 1975).^  No  dispersive uses  are known,  and the intermediate uses

are in  the synthesis of thioacids, S-trisubstituted  carbinols, and sub-

stituted thiazoles.  The  fraction of COS emitted  to  the  environment by

commercial sources  is  insignificant  compared with that  emitted by non-

commercial sources  (SRI,  1975); however, significant quantities are gen-

erated  in the atmospheric  decomposition of  CS,-,.  COS was recently presented
 Davidson, M.,  and M. Feinleib  (1972).  "Carbon  Disulfide  Poisoning:   A
 Review," Am.  Heart  J..  Vol.  83, No.  1,  p.  100.
 t
 CEH  (1973), Chemical Economics Handbook (Stanford  Research Institute.
 Menlo Park, California).

 SRI  (1975), "STAR Ranking  Objective  Subsystem."  Draft  Report,  EPA Con-
 tract 68-01-2940, Task  023,  Stanford Research  Institute. Menlo Park.
 California.
 §
 Directory of  Chemical Producers  (1975).  Stanford Research  Institute.
 Menlo Park, California.
                                   13

-------
as a chemical building block (Field and Sawhon, 1974)  and may find wide-

spread use in the future.
          Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions

          The quantity of CS~ and COS emitted from such natural sources

as volcanic and geothermal activity is not known; however,  previously

cited reports indicate these natural sources may be significant con-

tributors.  As previously indicated, COS has been produced  in large

quantities (=-3 ppm air) from cattle feedlots.  It also has  been found in

horseradish plant tissue up to 12 ppm (Rauch, 1962).   Combustion of fossil

fuels and other carbonaceous material in the presence of sulfur compounds

probably generates significant quantities and contributes to atmospheric

emissions; however,  the combustion contribution is probably disperse

rather  than concentrated.  Various  industrial gases have reported concen-

trations  ranging  from  30 ppm  to  90  ppm COS and hydrogen produced from

coal gas  contains both COS and CS2  (Perm, 1957).  Some NOX reducing cata-

lytic systems have been reported emitting COS from input S02  (Koutsoukos

et  al.,  1975).*

          Of primary  significance  to  the health  and welfare of man are

the sources where emissions  of COS  and CS™ are most concentrated and

controllable.  Such emissions are  found  in sulfur recovery plants and
potentially  from  mobile and  stationary sources where  reducing  catalysts

are used.
  Field,  E.,  and E.  A.  Sawhon (1974),  "Carbonyl Sulfide as  a Chemical Build-
  ing Block," paper presented at the Symposium on New Sulfur Chemistry,
  167th ACS National Meeting,  Los Angeles,  California,  1974.

  Rauch,  G. (1962),  "The Defensive Substances of Plants,  III:  Horse
  Radish Gas," Z.  Naturforsch.,  Vol.  17,  p.  800.

  Koutsoukos,  E. P., et al.  (1975),  "Assessment of Catalysts for Control
  of N0x from Stationary Power Plants," Report No. EPA-650/2 75 001-a,
  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

                                   14

-------
          The process of removing sulfur-containing compounds  (primarily




HoS) from gaseous fuels and recovering elemental sulfur as a by-product




is a widespread activity in the United States.  Sulfur recovery occurs




mainly in conjunction with refinery operations and natural gas processing




facilities and may also take place in certain types of chemical plants.




Future expansion in all these areas may be expected to occur.  In addi-




tion, the deployment during the next few decades of fossil fuel conversion




facilities, such as coal liquefaction and gasification plants and oil




shale processing plants, will greatly increase sulfur recovery activities.





          The most common method of removing and recovering sulfur  from




hydrocarbon gas streams is to scrub the gas with amine compounds  (e.g.,




monoethanolamine,  di-isopropanolamine) to absorb the F^S,  after which the



solution is stripped and the concentrated H2S stream is directed  to a




Glaus sulfur recovery unit where it is oxidized to elemental sulfur.




The Glaus process carries out catalytic oxidation of H2S to sulfur  in




the presence of air at elevated temperatures.  The important reactions




in the Glaus process are the direct oxidation reaction
                              - 02	- H20 + S                      (19)
and the two-step process
                             3
                       H2S + - 02	— SO  + H20                     (20)
                       2H2S + SO  	•- 3S + 2H 0                     (21)








As many as three stages of Glaus conversion may be used to remove up to




96 percent of the l^S from the feed stream.





          The formation of COS and CS,., during the Glaus process is due




to the presence of carbon compounds.  The amine scrubbing system removes





                                   15

-------
some CO- as well as hydrocarbons from Che fuel gas and H^S.  The reactions

which are thought to be important in the formation of €82  and COS during

Glaus conversion are:
                       CO  + H S 	—H 0 -+ COS                      (22)
                       COS + H2S	•-H 0 + CS                       (23)
                        CH  + 3S 	— H S + CS                       (24)
                          4            12
          The levels of COS and CS  present in the Glaus tail gas  stream

thus depend on the quantities of CO  and hydrocarbons present in  the

feed stream.  Typically, COS and CS  levels are on the order of 1000 ppm,

although much higher levels may be attained (Beavon and Vaell, 1972)."

          Typical practice in refineries and natural gas fields has been

to incinerate the Glaus tail gas, thus converting all reduced sulfur

compounds to SO,-, and eliminating odor problems caused by H S and  CS

emissions.  However, the enactment of state and local laws regulating  the

emission of sulfur compounds (usually expressed as total sulfur)  from

sulfur recovery plants  has brought about the increased use of tail gas
cleanup procedures.

          Tail gas treatment technologies generaly  fall into two  cate-

gories:  those that oxidize the sulfur compounds in the tail gas  to SO
and then apply SO  removal techniques, and those that reduce sulfur com-

pounds to l^S and then  apply f^S removal techniques.   Examples of the

former are the Wellman-Lord and IFP-2 processes.  Examples of the  latter
 'Beavon, D. K., and P. P. Vaell  (1972),  "The Beavon Sulfur  Removal  Process
 for Purifying Glaus Plant Tail Gas,"  paoer presented  at  the  37th Midyear
 Meeting, American Petroleum  Institute  Division  of Refining,  May  1972.

                                   16

-------
are the Cleanair, Beavon, and SCOT processes.  Two other processes, IFP-1

and Sulfreen, are basically extensions of the Claus process and treat SO

and H S together.

          Since incineration of the Claus tail gas leaves only trace

amounts of COS and CS ,  the emission of these compounds becomes a problem

only when tail gas treatment which deals with reduced sulfur compounds is

applied.  Only the Cleanair and Beavon processes emit any significant

amounts of COS and CSo (tail gas of the SCOT process is incinerated).

Both of these processes are effective in achieving greater than 99.9 per-

cent sulfur removal in conjunction with an efficient Claus plant (Beavon

and Vaell, 1972; Landrum et al., 1973)."'  However, emissions as high as

1000 ppm could occur with Beavon catalyst degradation.

          As of January 1,  1974 there were 108 Claus sulfur recovery plants

with an average capacity of 78.3 metric tons/day installed in the U.S.
                       4-
refineries (OGJ, 1974).   As of March 1, 1974, approximately 30 of these

plants had installed or announced plans for tail gas treatment units.

          Based on the total number (169) of Claus plants operating in

the United States in early 1973 we estimate that approximately 60 Claus

plants were associated with natural gas processing.  The average capacity

was approximately 127 metric tons/day (Beers, 1973).  There are also a

few small sulfur recovery units operating in chemical plants.

          The total level of sulfur recovery from all operations (refin-

eries,  natural gas processing,  and chemical plants) was 16,053 metric

tons/day in 1973 (Beers,  1973).  Incinerations of tail  gas resulting
 Landrum, L. H., et al. (1973), "The Cleanair Sulfur Process." paoer pre-
 sented at the 74th AICLE Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 1973.
t
 OGJ (1974), Oil and Gas Journal,  pp. 84-103 (April 1, 1974).'

 Beers, W. D. (1973),"Characterization of Claus Plant Emissions." EPA
 Report No. EPA-72-73-188.  Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
 D.C.  (April 1973).

                                   17

-------
from these operations would result in very small total emissions of COS

and CS .   Total emissions of SO  have been estimated at 135,000 metric tons

per year, assuming no tail gas treatment (Beers, 1973).


          Of the 30 Glaus sulfur plants in refineries for which tail gas

treatment units had been installed or planned in 1974, 16 were of the

Cleanair or Beavon type (EPA, 1975)," both of which release CS  and COS.

The total sulfur plant capacity for which these tail gas units were in-

tended was approximately 1,828.8 metric tons/day,  or 71 percent of the

total sulfur recovery capacity for which tail gas  cleanup units were

installed.


          As a basis for making a quantitative estimate of total emissions

of CS  and COS we assumed first that emissions result only from Beavon

or Cleanair units installed or planned for as of 1974 and that the propor-

tion of  these units installed in natural gas processing facilities is the

same as  the proportion installed in refineries.  On this basis the total

sulfur plant capacity of units having these tail gas treatment processes

would be 3,487.4 metric tons/day.  Assuming, on the average, that 2.0 kg/h

CS2 and  1.5 kg/h COS are emitted per 101.7 metric tons/day sulfur plant

capacity with Cleanair or Beavon tail gas treatment (EPA, 1975), we cal-

culate that 599.1 metric/tons CS  and 463.0 metric tons COS could have been

emitted  yearly from this source.  Worst case conditions would assume Beavon

catalyst degradation for all plants and would correspond to 20 kg/h CS

and 15.4 kg/h COS per 101.7 metric tons/day sulfur plant capacity.


          If we assume that 71 percent of the entire 16,063.9 metric

tons/day of U.S. sulfur plant capacity is equipped with Beavon or Clean-

air  units,  then 1,997.2 metric tons CS  and 1,543.3 metric tons COS

could be emitted yearly.  Again, worst case conditions would correspond

to 19,971.6 metric tons CS  and 15,432.6 metric tons COS emitted yearly.
*
 EPA (1975), Environmental Protection Agency,  unpublished data.


                                   18

-------
These figures do not take into account the anticipated expansion of

sulfur plant capacity.


          In coal conversion processes (gasification and liquefaction)

the sulfur compounds in the coal are subjected to a reducing atmosphere

so that H S, COS, and CS  are the primary sulfur compounds present in the

product and by-product gas streams.  In coal gasification processes, the

first step is the reaction of coal with steam and oxygen at elevated tem-

peratures and pressures.  The resulting synthesis gas  (mainly CO and H )

is then quenched to remove particulates and oils subjected to the CO shift

reaction


                      CO + H20	»- CO  + H                          (25)



to achieve the appropriate H /CO molecular ratio, and  finally reacted

catalytically to form methane or substitute natural gas  (SNG) as follows:
                        CO + 3H  	*~CH, + H2°       •               (26)
The raw synthesis gas contains on the order of 3000-5000 ppm of H S,

100-1000 ppm of COS, and smaller amounts of CS   (< 10 ppm)  (EPA, 1974).*

During the CO shift stage, much of the COS and CS  is hydrolyzed as

follows:
                                                                     (27)
                       COS + HO 	—H S + CO       .                (28)
The remaining gas is then scrubbed to remove the acid gases CO  and H S

as well as COS and CS .   After stripping the scrubber solution, the result-

ing gas stream is dilute in H S compared with the concentrated streams
*
 EPA  (1974), "Symposium Proceedings:  Environmental Aspects of Fuel Con-

 version Technology  (May 1974, St. Louis, Missouri)," Report No. EPA-650/

 2-73-118, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. (October 1974)

                                   19

-------
 (90 percent l^S) derived from refinery gases.  If the stream is too dilute,


 the Glaus process will have low efficiency in converting H S to sulfur.


An alternative process which may be used is the Stretford process, where

 the H S is absorbed by a solution of sodium carbonate, sodium vanadate,


 and anthraquinone disulfonic acid.  Through a series of steps,  the over-


 all oxidation reaction [Eq. (20)] is carried out.  The Stretford process


 does not appreciably affect the COS and CS  present in the feed stream.


          El Paso Natural Gas Company has proposed to build a coal gasi-


 fication plant in northwestern New Mexico for the production of 76.2 mil-


 lion cubic meters (250 million cubic feet) per day of SNG.   The Stretford


 process will be used to treat the H S resulting from scrubbing of the  syn-


 thesis gas by the Rectisol  (cold methanol) process.   Both lean and rich


t^S streams  will  be generated and treated for sulfur recovery.  The tail


 gas from the rich stream treatment will be incinerated, thus converting


 all sulfur compounds to SO.,.  The tail gas from the lean stream treatment


 (containing mostly C02 and N2) will be vented to the atmosphere.  The  con-


 centrations of CS,-, and COS  in this stream have been estimated at approxi-


mately 2 ppm and 65 ppm, respectively (El Paso, 1974) *  The total level


 of emissions from the plant will be 2.7 kg/h CS2 and 78 kg/h COS.  These

 emission levels correspond  to the release of 0.031 percent of the sulfur

 in the coal entering the plant as CS~ and 0.57 percent of the sulfur as


 COS.  The expected emission levels are based on thermodynamic calculations


 but are not well defined at this time, however.


          In general, the  release of COS and CS  from coal gasification


 plants will depend on the  sulfur content of the coal being gasified, the


 methods chosen for gas purification and sulfur recovery, and the treatment


 (if any) applied to the sulfur recovery plant tail gas.  The numbers pre-


 sented above are based on  the best current estimates according to El Paso's
*
 El Paso  (1974), "Revised Report on Environmental Factors, Burnham Coal

 Gasification Project," El Paso Natural Gas Company, El Paso, Texas.


                                   20

-------
engineering design of a proposed commercial-size plant.  Unfavorable  re-

action kinetics could result in emission several times  the expected  levels.

          The generation of reduced sulfur compounds in coal  liquefaction
can occur in the following two processes: (1) the gasification of coal or
by-product carbonaceous material to generate hydrogen  for use in the

hydrogenation step of coal liquefaction, and (2) the hydrogenation step

itself, wherein finely divided coal, which has been slurried  in a coal-
derived solvent, is  reacted with hydrogen to carry out dissolution  of the

organic matter  in the coal.

          The production of hydrogen from coal or other carbonaceous

material proceeds much as  in the production of SNG.  The coal is gasi-

fied with steam and  oxygen, the synthesis gas is quenched, and the  CO
shift reaction  [Eq.  (25)]  is carried out.  Of course,  the extent of the
CO shift reaction is much  greater than it is when methane is  the desired
end product.  Thus the degree of hydrolysis of CS  and COS may be expected
to be greater.  The  subsequent purification of the H   stream  to remove

H S and CO , followed by sulfur recovery, will undoubtedly result in  the

release of lower quantities of CS  and COS per unit volume of gas produced,

for the reasons cited above.

          The hydrogenation of the coal slurry will generate  primarily

H S if pure hydrogen is employed.  This H S will enter the by-product
hydrocarbon gas stream, where purification and sulfur  recovery will be
carried out much as  in refinery operations.  CS  and COS will be formed

primarily via reactions with hydrocarbons and CO  in the Glaus plant.

          An alternate route to coal hydrogenation has been considered
in which synthesis gas would be used instead of hydrogen as the reducing

medium (Exxon,  1975).  In  this case, the level of CS   and COS generated
*
 Exxon (1975), "Evaluation of Pollution Control in Fossil Fuel Conversion
 Processes—Liquefaction:  Section 2,  SRC Process," Report No. EPA-650/2-
 74-009-f, Exxon Research  and Engineering Company (March 1975).

                                   21

-------
would be significantly higher, due to both the omission of the CO shift



reaction (7), in which CS  and COS tend to be hydrolyzed, and the presence



of CO and CO  in the hydrogenation medium, which leads to the formation of



COS and CS .




          The treatment of sulfur-containing by-product gases in oil



shale retorting and upgrading plants will be similar to treatment carried



out in refineries.   A more dilute H S stream resulting from amine scrubbing



of these gases will result, because of the high CO  content of the gases



and the preferential absorption of C02 along with the H^S.   The dilute



H^S stream entering the Glaus plant results in a lower overall sulfur



recovery and possibly higher COS and CS  emissions in the tail gas after



treatment.  The Beavon or Cleanair processes are anticipated for the first



commercial oil shale plants.




          Colony Development Operation estimates that for a 50.000 bbl



(5960 m-*) per day oil shale plant, 29 kg/h of sulfur compounds (such as



502) will be emitted in the 175 metric tons/day sulfur recovery plant



tail gas (Colony, 1974)."  This corresponds to a sulfur removal efficiency



of 99.8 percent.  Assuming that, on a volume basis,  the tail gas sulfur



is equally divided between COS and CS2, we calculate that 11.8 kg/h CS2



and 9.5 kg/h COS could be emitted as an upper limit from a 50,000 bbl per



day oil shale plant.




          Certain reducing catalysts for the control of NO  also reduce
                                                          X


S02 to S, l^S, and COS.  This is generally considered to be nonselective



NO  reduction and implies that sufficient reductant is present in the



flue or exhaust gas streams to reduce all the oxidant constituents of the



stream.  An assessment of nonselective catalytic reduction as applied to



stationary power plants is made by EPA (Koutsoukos et al..  1975).  Some
i,.

~Colony  (1974), "An Environmental Impact Analysis for a Shale Oil Complex


 at Parachute Creek, Colorado," Colony Development Operation, Atlantic


 Richfield Company.
                                  22

-------
 reducing catalysts  do not produce  H S  or COS  while  efficiently reducing



 NO  and SO .   No data were given for CS^ production for any of the  non-



 selective catalysts evaluated.   It is  probable  that the residence  times



 under  the operating conditions  in  the  catalytic processes  reviewed  were



 not sufficient for  CS2 generation.   In some  reported  instances successful



 attempts were  made  to maximize  simultaneous  S02 reduction  by increasing



 residence times; however,  COS production dramatically increased together



 with noncollectable sulfur species other than elemental S  or HoS.   A



 significant  fraction was  probably  CS2«




          Of the nonselective reducing catalysts (that  emit COS) reviewed



 in  the EPA report,  the most applicable to power plants  appear  to be TRW's



NOX  - SO  catalytic reduction process.   In this process approximately



 six  percent of input  sulfur is reported emitted as COS.  The remaining



 sulfur is emitted as  elemental sulfur and H S.




          An important reaction in Glaus plant CSo production  [Eq.  (4)]



 combines COS and H S  to form CS   and H20.  Considering  this reaction it



 is probable that some CS2 is produced in nonselective reducing catalysts.







 Estimates of Ambient  Air Concentrations




     Downwind  ground-level concentrations can be estimated by  a plume



 dispersion model  (Perkins, 1974):*
                        X = 	     e
                            TTCJ a U
                              y z
where




         X = M-g COS and CS /m



         Q = source strength in |ag/sec
1/2
    \ rr_ /  I

                             (29)
 Perkins, H. C. (1974),  Air Pollution.  Chap. 8,  "Plume Dispersion" (McGraw-


 Hill Book Company,  New York,  New York).




                                   23

-------
         U = average wind speed in m/sec


     a ,a  = vertical and horizontal diffusion coefficients
      y  z
             in meters


         H = effective height of source emission in meters.



Using a nomograph of Turner's (Perkins, 1974), the maximum ground-level


concentration downwind from a 50-m stack under thinly overcast conditions


and moderate windspeed (2-3 m/sec) would be approximately 2.5 km from the


source.  The value
                               o a
                                v z
reduces to 3.1 •  10  .   Using U = 3 m/sec and Beavon catalyst degradation


(20 kg/h 082 and 15.4 kg/h COS per 101.6 metric tons/day sulfur recovery


plant:  Q = 5.5 '  10  p,g CS2/sec and 4.3 '  106 |ig COS/sec)





             v   (3.1 •  10'5)[(5.5 •  106) or  (4.3 •  1Q6 >]
             X =                    „
               = 57 |_ig CS2/m3 and 44 (ig COS/m3




This would be the maximum ambient ground-level concentration occurring


in any 1-h period.  Average annual concentrations would be considerably


lower .



     It is of interest to consider what 1-h maximal ambient concentra-


tions would be expected for an array of oil refinery sulfur recovery plants


under inversion conditions.  Perkins (1974) presents the following inver-


sion model which can be adapted to summing refinery arrays:
x =

                            1/2
                        (2rr)   UH.a
                                 1 y
                                   24
                                                                    (30)

-------
where
     H  = upper level inversion layer

      i


      y = distance from horizontal plume axis.
Thus for a hypothetical array of nine sulfur  recovery plants  in  rows  of




three at 3-ktn intervals,



performed to calculate X:
three at 3-km intervals,  the sum of Eq.  (31) for given values of y. is
                  X =
                       (2n)1/2UH a


                               1 yi
                                                    2-,
                                            -1/2
                                     1 + 2e
                                                                     (31)
where
      a  .  =  f(d)

      yi


      a    =  f(d  +  3  km)
      a    =  f(d  .  6  km)
                                           X =
                               3 km




                              ^    *)
                                     I
                                       y  =  3  km
Table  3  presents  the  results  for  distances  of  1,  5,  10,  20,  and 100 km



at  an  H.  of  400 meters,  a U  of  3  m/sec,  and a  Q  of 20 kg/h CS   (5.6 • 106



lag/sec)  and  15.4  kg/h  COS  (4.3  • 10   (ig/sec), corresponding to  emissions




from a 101.7 metric  tons/day  sulfur  recovery plant with  Beavon catalyst



degradation.






     The  predicted ambient values are directly related to  emission rates




with this model.
                                   25

-------
                                Table 3

          ESTIMATED ONE-HOUR AMBIENT INVERSION CONCENTRATIONS
                   :OS AT VARIOUS DISTANCES FROM A I
                    ARRAY OF SULFUR RECOVERY PLANTS
OF CS2 AND COS AT VARIOUS DISTANCES FROM A HYPOTHETICAL
22
24
12
9
7
5
4
3
2
1
                       1 km    5 km    10 km    20 km    100 km
         Ug/m3 CS2
         ug/m3 COS


     It is also of interest to compute what ambient levels of CS,-, or COS

could exist within a defined basin during a period of stagnation.  The
following simple model can be used to calculate the potential ambient
levels from sulfur recovery plants:
                           X .                                       (32,
where

      X = ng/m3
      T = hours of stagnation
      P = total sulfur recovery capacity (metric tons/day)
      F = fraction emitting CS  and COS
     Q' = emission rate (ug/h 102 metric tons/day)
      L = fraction lost from basin
                          2
      A = area of basin (m )
     H. = height of inversion (m).

Substituting the following values,  we can approximate for the Los Angeles
Basin the input from sulfur recovery plants under worst operating condi-
tions (Beavon catalyst degradation):
                                    26

-------
      T = 120 hours
      P = 2033.4 metric tons/day
      F = 0.7

     Q' = 2.0 •  10   ng CS2/h (20 kg/h) or 1.5 •  10   ng COS/h
          (34 ng/h)
      L = 0.1
      A = 1.55 •  109 m2 (15 miles by 40 miles)
H. = 300 m
i
Y

(,1^1); (/(JJj.q.,) ((j . 1) \
• 1010\
J
(0.9)
                         (1.55 •  109)(3 •  102)

                  = 65 |j.g CS2/m3  or  48 |ig COS/m3


     From 1973 data, we estimate 136 million kg (1.4 x 10  metric tons)
of CS2 are emitted to the atmosphere annually from industrial production
for intermediate and dispersive commercial use.  Assuming that this com-
mercial emission is evenly distributed with respect to the population,
the stagnation level for the Los Angeles Basin can be calculated in a
manner as for sulfur recovery plant emissions:

                               ED F (1 - L)
                           X = —£	                         (33)
                                    i

where

       X = ng/m3
       E = daily national emission rate (p.g/day)
       D = days of stagnation
      F  = fraction of population
       P
       L = loss during inversion
       A = area of basin
      H. = height of inversion.
                                  27

-------
 Substituting  the  following  values:




                               (1.4

                                365 days  x  9.08  •  1011/ton)
E = 3.73 •  1014 M.g/day (1.4 •  105 metric tons/
       D  =  5  days


      F   =  0.036  (7.5 million)
       P

       L  =  0.1


     AH.  =4.65  '  1011 m3
       i
                   v    (3.73  -IP14)(5)(0.036)(0.9)
                   X  —

                               4.65  •  1011
                        6.04  •  103
                       4.65 •  1011



                      = 129 n/m3 CS
                                    2
     Emissions of COS and CS  to the Los Angeles Basin from other sources



are difficult to estimate; a preliminary appraisal of the quantity of



sulfur flowing through the different fuel processes is required before


such emissions can be estimated.  Table 4 presents the sources of Cali-


fornia's primary energy supply.



     We do not consider gas, wood,  hydroele^          ;.   _cr primary


energy supplies because they are not a source of sulfur emissions .   Nor


do we consider coal, because it is not a significant part of California's


(and Los Angeles') energy supply or sulfur emissions.




     Table 5 presents data concerning the sales of heating oils and sul-



fur content in California.
                                  28

-------
                                Table 4
            CALIFORNIA TOTAL PRIMARY ENERGY SUPPLY:  1971
           Petroleum
           Coal
           Gas
           Wood
           Hydroelectric
           Nuclear
  10   Joules
(Trillion BTU)
3120.0  (2971.4)
  50.7  (48.3)
2480.0  (2361.9)
  15.6  (14.9)
 422.3  (402.2)
  38.0  (36.2)
6126.6  (5834.9)
Percentage
 of  Total
  50.927o
   0.83
  40.48
   0.26
   6.89
   0.62
                                                    100.00%
           Source:  SRI  (1973)"
                                Table  5
                   CALIFORNIA  SALES OF HEATING OILS
     Type

#1 Distillate
#2 Distillate
#4 Distillate
#5 Distillate
#6 Distillate
3
10 Barrels
497
3059
730
296
2873
7455
Product kg/
Barrel
129.7
135.2
149.7
153.8
156.5
Wt Percent S
0.088
0.230
090
i ", .">.
-i - ^, .J j
1.640
Metric Tons
of Sulfur
5.
951,
1,191,
605,
7,378.
10,133,
7
,6
.8
.8
,3
i 2
Sources:  NPN  (1975) ; Bureau  of Mines  (1974)  for  average  sulfur  content
 SRI (1973),  "Meeting California's Energy Requirements.  1975-2000," SRI
 Project ECC-2355,  Stanford Research Institute,  Menlo Park,  California.
 NPN (1975),  National Petroleum News Factbook (May 1975).
f:
 Bureau of Mines  (1974),  Burner Fuel Oils,  1974," Mineral  Industrial Sur-
 veys,  Bureau of  Mines,  Petroleum Products  Survey,  Nos.  82, 86, and 88.
                                   29

-------
     These petroleum products are consumed in residential and commercial

space heating.  The most recent census data assign 33 percent of Cali-

fornia's total population to the Los Angeles-Long Beach metropolitan

area."  Southern California has only half the degree-day heating require-

ment of northern California (SRI, 1973).  Lt is reasonable, then, to

estimate the sulfur burden in the Los Angeles SMSA from heating oils at
         10.133.2 x 0.33 x 0.5 = 1672-° ™tric tons of sulfur
                                             year
     The sales of distillate and residual fuel oils in all applications

other than space heating in California are summarized in Tables 6 and 7,

along with their sulfur burden.  We assigned the grades of product used

by each listed user, since the Bureau of Mines data do not so differentiate


     Some users in California do not burden the Los Angeles area atmosphere

with all of their sulfur (e.g., vessel bunkering).   Other users have in-

tegrated capability to some degree to remove the sulfur from the combus-

tion products (e.g.. oil company uses).   Selection of users was not in the

scope of work for this study,  so the aggregate sulfur burden is not esti-

mated.  The applicable fractions for the Los Angeles SMSA for any of the

user categories that might be selected are the population fraction (Los

Angeles' population in relation to southern California's population) and

the activity fraction (southern California's fraction of California's

industrial activity as measured by value added in manufacture)(SRI, 1973).

Thus, 0.55 (population fraction) x 0.64 (activity fraction) = 0.35.

0.35 x sulfur content for selected user = sulfur burden.


     Table 8 presents the Los Angeles SMSA sales and average sulfur con-

tent of gasoline.
 12/27 data from Sales Management. July 27, 1975.


                                   30

-------
                               Table  6

          CALIFORNIA  SALES  OF  DISTILLATE-TYPE  FUEL  OILS  AND
                   AVERAGE SULFUR  CONTENT:   1973
Use
Industrial
Oil company
Railroads
Vessel bunkering
Military
Electric utilities
On highway
Off highway
Other
Sources: Bureau of

103 Barre
5.570
903
8.530
2,210
5.605
888
18,415
4,278
480
.j.
Mines (1973,'

P roduc t
Is kg/Barrel
133
133
134
133
133
133
133
133
133
' 1974)
Table 7
CALIFORNIA SALES OF RESIDUAL-TYPE
AVERAGE SULFUR CONTENT:
Use
Industrial
Oil company use
Railroads
Vessel bunkering
Military
Electric utilities
Other
Sources: Bureau of
103 Barre
6.466
5,495
54
19,356
1, 134
84,183
202
Mines (1973,
Product
Is kg/Barrel
154
156
154
156
154
156
154
1974)
Wt.
Percent S
0.32
0.32
0.315
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.265
0.32
0.32

FUEL OILS AND
1974
Wt.
Percent S
1.33
1.64
1.33
1.64
1.33
1.64
1.33
Metric Tons
of Sulfur
2370.4
384.3
3597.9
940.4
2385.3
377.9
6490.0
1820.6
204.3


Metric Tons
of Sulfur
13,232.6
14,112.0
110.5
49,709.4
2,318.0
216, 195.9
413.4
Bureau of Mines (1973),  "Fuel Oil Sales,  Annual,  1973.'
                                 31

-------
                                Table 8

                LOS ANGELES SMSA SALES OF GASOLINE AND
                     AVERAGE SULFUR CONTENT:  1974
Grade
Premium price
Regular price
103 Barrels
44,310
39,770
Product
kg/Barrel
117.9
118.3
Wt.
Percent S
0.033
0.057
Metric Tons
of Sulfur
1725.6
2685.5
4411.1
   Source:  NPN (1975); Bureau of Mines (1974)


     The sulfur burden for Los Angeles from motor gasoline is therefore

4411.1 metric tons of sulfur.

     Table 9 summarizes the estimated daily emissions of sulfur and poten-
tial COS and CS2 emissions if mobile and stationary nonselective reducing

catalysts are used in the Los Angeles area.  Using the sum of the esti-
mated emission rates for COS and CS^, we can calculate the stagnation
level in a similar manner as in Eqs. (32) and  (33):
                             X =
ED (1 - L)
   AH.
(34)
Substituting the following values for electric utilies and automobile
sources:
                   13                         11
       E = 1.4  ' 10   p.g COS/day, and 6.7  ' 10   )ag CS /day
       D = 5 days
       L = 0.1
                    11  3
     AH.  = 4.65  • 10   m
       i
                                   32

-------


C
o
en ^

E - 	
QJ ^
4-J
•H ™
1 S"
s

H
en
W

Q
^
<£
CN C
13 en O ,,
2 u 'H "'^
en Q ™ o
en z QJ 7:
M < > "
p*j C
W en o ^
ON O U
Q U
QJ g


CN
0
V— /



, — i
O
1 — 1
i X

ro
VO



en
0
U


m
o
i— H
1
^
i — 1






CN
0
u

m
1 O
I O

o




en
U
v£)
I O
1
o
'"H <3 O
^ O C 	 |
H S Z
H O
H M C
PH en o O
(S ^ 'r~' rrt
5 W ^ -rt
en j> CL ^p
Z Z E rtr
00 3 "
O CJ en ,3-
C
a S *
f O

a 3 «
en u-i ,™
h4 ^ E
•*^ C/l






CN -%J"
r — t i — 1
O O
1 — 1 1 — 1
X X

"° -1

O 1
1
o










CO CO
i — i • — i
0 0
1 — 1 1 — 1
X X

CN VQ
' — ' •<}"





QJ
C
• H
, — 1
O
en
CO
00

QJ
£>
•r-l
4-1 4-
O en
E !-.
O QJ
4-1 _C
3 4-1
< O











QJ
, — i
, — I
CO
4-1
cn
C
•H

W
4-t
Cfi
r'*'! r*^
i— i 03
co S
4J JC
cd 60
U T-l
r".
00
C

03 t-i
34-1 eg
*O i— ( 4-1
QJ 3 -H
>J CO ^H
•H
QJ co E
> cfl
•H ^
4-1 CO W
0 O "O
QJ U co
r-i O
QJ 4-1 J-J
en o r-i
C T-I
O r-l CO
C • *J
O
QJ
^H en co
•H cd QJ

Ox) C
E QJ CO
-^.4-1 CX
^i co £
^-i ^ O
cd T-I u
C 4-1
O en i — i
•H QJ *H
4-1 O
cd C
4-1 O
CO -H r-l
en co
00 CO -H
C -H )-i
•r-4 E •*-*
E5 QJ cn
3 3
en CN T3
en cn C
< U M
"i' T
33

-------
_ (1.4 • 10   ug COS/day and/or 6.7 x 10   qg CS/day)(5)(0.9)


                        4.65 •  10U m3




              3   ,  ,  ,    „„ ,  3
                    3
      = 135 ug COS/m  and 6.5 ug CS /m
     Table 10 summarizes all the contributing sources to the Los Angeles


stagnation levels of COS and CS9 under the assumptions previously given.



     It should be noted that the values used in the above cases approxi-


mate near worst case conditions.  Actual averages over longer time


periods (e.g., one year) would be considerably lower.
                                Table 10




              SUMMARY OF SOURCE CONTRIBUTION TO ESTIMATED

                       AMBIENT STAGNATION LEVELS
                                             Estimated Ambient

                                             Stagnation Levels

                                                  (Ug/tn3)
                                            CS
                  Source                       2            COS
     Refinery sulfur recovery plants         65             48


     Electric utilities"'                      6            128

                        /v
     Automotive gasoline"                     0.3            7


     Commercial applications                129             --
          Total                             200             183
      Nonselective reducing catalyst
                                   34

-------
Health and Welfare Effects


     As previously noted, 082 is used as an industrial chemical primarily

in the cold vulcanization of rubber and the manufacture of viscose rayon.

Acute and chronic human exposures have occurred in the industrial workplace,

providing a broad range of health effect documentations and encouraging

continuing research programs to establish threshold limits.  Conversely,

COS has received little application as an industrial chemical; thus

records of human exposures are few, and health effects studies are all

but absent from the literature.  However, because of the similarity in

chemical and physical properties, as well as some reports  that COS is a

potentially toxic biological metabolite of CS2, some analogies may be

inferred between the two  substances.


     As mentioned above,  extensive documentation on the health and wel-

fare effects of CS2 are present  in the literature.  These  include a number

of review articles and three international symposia.  The  World Health

Organization  (WHO) will  soon be  issuing a final report on  CS2  following

review by appropriate government and  industrial health organizations.

Aside  from the WHO document, reviews  to note are those by  Brieger and

Teisinger  (1967)*on the First International Symposium; a review of the

Third  International Symposium  (Lieben, 1974),   a Yant Memorial  Lecture

 (Teisinger, 1974); and general literature reviews by Patty  (1963),
*
 Brieger, H., and J. Teisinger (1967), Toxicology of Carbon Bisulfide
 (Excerpta Medica Foundation, New York, New York).

 Lieben, J.  (1974), "Third International Symposium on Toxicology of
 Carbon Bisulphide," Arch. Environ. Health, Vol 29,  p. 173.
*
 Teisinger, J. (1974), "1972 Yant Memorial Lecture—New Advances in Toxi-
 cology of Carbon Disulfide," Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc.  J.. Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 55.


                                    35

-------
Browning (1965)/f Hamilton and Hardy (1974),  and Davidson and Feinleib

(1972).  The following paragraphs are syntheses of the above reviews with

current research findings.


     Absorption, Excretion, Metabolism

     CS« in inspired air enters the blood by way of the alveoli.  It is

quite  solubel in fat, miscible with alcohol, ether, and benzene, and

relatively insoluble in water.  An equilibrium  (total body saturation) can

be achieved within two hours upon inhalation of levels from 17  to 30 ppm

Eighty percent  of inhaled CS^ is sorbed within  the first 15 minutes and
                                                     *
45 percent in two hours  (Teisinger and Soucek,  1949).   Red blood cells
                                                            o
take up twice as much CS2 as the plasma (McKee, et al, 1943)/ and the
fat-soluble property allows distribution to all tissues (Brieger, 1961) .**

     Blood levels of CS  , following exposure,  fall 75 percent in one hour
                                                                     tt
and almost to zero in two (Teisinger and Soucek, 1949).  McKee  (1941)

found  that complete desaturation requires about three to eight  hours and
is directly related to the level of exposure.  Metabolic degradation

accounts for approximately 95 percent of the loss  of free C§2>  while
  Browning, E.  (1965), Toxicity and Metabolism  of Industrial Solvents
   (Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, New York).
  Hamilton, A., and H. L. Hardy (1974),  Industrial Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
   (Publishing Sciences Group Inc., Acton, Massachusetts).
  •t
  Teisinger, J.,  and B. Soucek  (1949),  "Absorption and Elimination  of
  Carbon Disulfide  in Man," J.  Ind. Hyg., Vol.  31, p. 67.
  8
  McKee, R., et al.(1943), "A Solvent Vapor:  Carbon Disulfide--Absorp-
  tion, Elimination, Metabolism and Mode  of Action," J. Am. Med. Assoc.,
  Vol.  122, p.  217.
**
  Brieger, H.  (1961), "Chronic  Carbon Disulfide Poisoning," J.  Occup.
  Med., Vol. 3, p.  302.

  McKee, R.  (1941), "Solubility of Carbon Disulfide Vapor  in Body Fluids
  and  Tissues," J.  Ind. Hyg., Vol. 23,  p. 151.

                                  36

-------
excretion via the lungs and kidney account for 5 and 0.05 percent, respec-

tively (Teisinger and Soucek. 1949).  Other research indicates that from

10 percent to 30 percent is exhaled, and 1 percent is excreted in urine

(Brieger, 1961).

     The metabolic products of CS? in human metabolism are not thoroughly

known.  Dithiocarbamates are the products of the reaction of CS, with

amino acids  (Brieger, 1961) and have been found in the blood (Scheel.
      -I-
1967);'  thiocarbamide has been found in the urine of exposed workers.

Thiourea and 2-mercapto-2-thiazolinone-5 have also been identified in the

urine (Pergal et al .  . 1972)^

     From comprehensive studies on the metabolism of CS,-, by Soucek and

Zahradnik, Davidson  and Feinleib  (1972) proposed that sorbed CS., com-

bines with materials containing a free amine group or basic nitrogen

atom.  Thus products of the reaction of CS2 with proteins contain an in-

creased number of sulfhydryl groups.

     There are several mechanisms regarding the toxic action of CS .

These involve the interaction of CS, or its metabolites with proteins.
                                  +
fats, and coenzymes.   Simon  (1961)  has suggested that CS, is a universal

enzyme inhibitor that disturbs oxidative phosphorylation and fat metabolism.
 Scheel, L. (1967), "Experimental CS2 Poisoning in Rabbits, Its Mechanism
 and Similarities with Human Case Reports," in Toxicology  of Carbon Disul-
 fide,  H. Brieger and J. Teisinger. eds., pp. 107-114  (Excerpta Medica
 Foundation, New York, New York).
+
 Pergal, M., et al. (1972), "Carbon Disulfide Metabolites  Excreted in the
 Urine of Exposed Workers," Arch. Environ. Health. Vol. 25, p. 38.
*
 Simon, K.  (1961), "Chronische Vergiftung durch Schwefelkohlenstoff,"
 Med. Monatschr., Vol. 16, p. 810, cited  in Toxicity and Metabolism of
 Industrial Solvents,  E. Browning, ed.,  p. 704 (Elsevier Publishing Com-
 oany,  New York, New York).

                                   37

-------
Cohen et al.  (1959)" propose that the thiocarbamates and other metabolites
with sulfhydryl groups chelate metal ions and interfere with the energy

metabolism of cells.  The stress incurred promotes a mobilization of fat

stores and leads to a disturbance of cellular metabolism and cell injury
or death.  Disturbances in zinc metabolism following 089 exposure have
been observed by Scheel (1967), and decreases in serum zinc and increases

in urinary zinc in exposed workers have been observed by El Gazzar and

associates (1973).   Many enzymes require metal ions as activators (e.g.,
Zn and Mg for alkaline phosphatase); thus the chelating effect of

su1fhydryl-bearing metabolites of CS9 to metal ions would  inhibit the
enzymes from performing their normal function.  Scheel (1967) has noted
decreased toxic effects of CS9 in animals fed highly mineralized diets.

     Mack et al. (1974)  found inhibition of oxidatixe N-demethylation
in man at doses as low as 10 ppm CS7 for six hours.  The inhibition was

reversible and the deficit in metabolism was gradually compensated after
exposure ceased.  The inhibitory mechanism is not known.   However, as  in

the above studies, the CS.-, metabolites, which are proposed to have similar
structures as dithiocarbamates, become active in enzymes due to chelation
of catalytically active metals.  Mack et al.  state, however, that a
reverse route is conceivable,  in which the metabolites (e.g., dithio-
carbamates) release CS?, providing an indirect reaction with mixed-
function oxidases and other enzymes.
 Cohen, et al.  (1959), "Biochemical Mechanisms  in Chronic Carbon Disul-
 fide Poisoning," Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.. Vol. 20, p. 303.
t
 El Gazzar, et  al.  (1973). "Changes  in Zinc and Serum Proteins Due  to
 Carbon Disulfide Poisoning," Brit. J  Ind. Med.. Vol. 30. p.  284.
*
 Mack, T., K. Freundt, and D. Henschler  (1974). "inhibition  of Oxidative
 N-Demethylation  in Man by Low Doses  of  Inhaled Carbon Disulfide."  Biochem.
 Pharmac.. Vol. 23, p. 607.

                                   38

-------
                    »l-
     Vigliani (1954)" reports that under chronic exposures to €82, a


persistent presence of lipoproteinic macromolecules leads to hyaliniza-


tion and carbon disulfide arteriosclerosis.  Vigliani implicated a dis-


turbance of the lipaemia clearing factor.  In his exposed subjects, he


noted greater incidences of hypertension and vascular spasms, which were


correlated with an increase in the ratio of beta to alpha lipoproteins.


Cohen et al. (1959) also noted the same increases in beta to alpha lipo-


proteins but attributed the results to stress rather than to an inhibi-


tion of the lipaemia clearing factor.



     A study of 120 viscose rayon workers cited a 34 percent increase  over


normal of serum cholesterol, and the results were confirmed using dogs


as experimental animals (Davidson and Feinleib, 1972).



     The effects of CSo on Vitamin B6 metabolism have been studied exten-


sively and there is a significant similarity in the neurological symptoms


of B6 deficiency and C&2 poisoning (Davidson and Feinleib, 1972).   In-


creased diets of Vitamin B6 have been shown to inhibit toxic effects of


CS« in animals (Teisinger, 1974).  Teisinger feels that nervous system


lesions  due  to  C$2 poisoning are associated with the inhibition of mono-


amine oxidase activity and the accumulation of serotonin in the brain.


This mechanism is not widely supported, however, because there is con-


tradictory evidence in the literature.  Browning (1965) suggests another


mechanism involving chelation of copper by thiocarbatnates in nerve cells,


resulting in inhibition of the functions of cytochrome oxidases and

coenzyme-A dehydrogenase.
*
 Vigliani, E. C. (1954), "Carbon Disulfide Poisoning in Viscose Rayon

 Factories," Brit.  J. Ind.  Med..  Vol. 11, p. 235.



                                   39

-------
     The liver is an important organ in the metabolism of CSo.  Dalvi et

al. (1974," 1975'), using radio labeled CS2, have revealed that COS is

formed from 082 when incubated with rat liver microsomes in the presence

of NADPH.  Furthermore, the COS is metabolized to yield sulfur radicals and
C02-  Each step appears analogous to a mixed-function oxidase catalysis

and leads to formations of highly reactive sulfur radicals that covalently

bind to microsomal membranes and decrease the concentration of cytochrome

P-450.  This highly reactive sulfur leads to a decrease in the concentra-

tion of cytochrome P-450 and hepatic damage seen on liver examinations

following CS2 administration to rats.   Thus, if oxidative metabolism

plays a significant role in the toxicity of CS  (forming reactive sulfur

atoms), COS would likewise be expected to be toxic.

     Unfortunately, we have not uncovered in the literature any research

describing the mechanism of toxicity of COS, other than the formation of

a reactive sulfur species in liver microsomes.  However, assuming oxida-

tive metabolism is the eventual cause of toxicity for CS~ and COS (due

to the formation of highly reactive sulfur atoms), then on a molecular

level one molecule of CS2 would be twice as toxic as one molecule of COS.

This is an oversimplification of the toxicity problem for the whole

organism, due to the confounding of probable differences in tissue dis-

tribution, metabolism, and the formation of toxic metabolites.  However,

because of the lack of data concerning chronic COS toxicity, we hypo-

thesize the 2:1 (CS2:COS) toxicity ratio.
 Dalvi, R. R., et al.  (1974), "Studies of the Metabolism of Carbon Bi-
 sulfide by Rat Liver Microsomes," Life Sci., Vol. 14, p. 1785.
t
 Dalvi, R  R., et al.  (1975), "Toxicological Implications of the Mixed-
 Function Oxidase Catalyzed Metabolism of Carbon Bisulfide," Chem.
 Biol. Int., Vol. 10, p. 347.

                                  40

-------
     Toxic Effects

     Although CS2 is highly volatile,  a case of acute poisoning by in-
gestion,  followed by death within four hours,  occurred in a victim who

swallowed a glass of CS2 (Foreman.  1886) ."   Physical examination prior

to death showed normal pupils,  abnormal respiration, and a rapid pulse

(150-160/minute).  Some studies on the acute toxicity of COS in animals

have been reported and are presented in Table 11 along with CS  data.


                                Table  11

               LETHAL DOSES  OF  CS2  AND COS  (INHALATION)
cs2
Species (ppm)
Man (Patty, 1963) 4,815
Cats (Browning, 1965) 1,260
Rabbits (Patty, 1963)
Mice
Mice
Mice
Rats
Rats
(Patty,
(Patty,
(Patty,
(Hayashi
(Hayashi
1963)
1963)
1963)
et al., 1971)"
et al., 1971)
Death COS
(Time) (ppm)
30 min
180 min
3,
8,
2,
1,
5,
20,

200
900
900
200
000
000
Death
(Time)

60
0.
1.
35
10
45

min
75 min
5 min
min
h
min
  Hayashi,,  E.,  et al.  (1971),  "Acute Toxicity of Carbonyl Sulfide
  Towards Animals," Oyo Yakuri,  Vol. 5,  No.  3,  p.  435.
     In acute exposures, COS and CS2 act upon  the central nervous  system

and result  in death by respiratory paralysis.  Chronic  toxicity  studies

with animals for COS have not been found in  the  literature  and exposure

of humans has not been recorded.
  Foreman,  W.  (1886),  "Notes  of a Fatal  Case  of Poisoning by Bisulphide
  of Carbon,"  Lancet,  Vol.  2,  p.  118.

                                   41

-------
     Experimental studies of C5>2 on animals reveal a wide variety  of

changes involving the nervous, reproductive, and cardiovascular systems.
and the liver, kidney, and blood.

     Chronic exposure in man, likewise, has caused a variety of effects.
Most noticeable are those on the nervous system; potentially the most
dangerous effects are those on the heart, which have led to an increased

incidence of coronary heart disease.

     In the 1850s the French were aware of  the public health aspects of

respired 082 and diagnosed over 80 cases of "carbon disulfide neurosis"

(a wide variety of nervous and mental disorders with an early stage of
excitation followed by a second stage of depression) in the rubber indus-

try, where CS^, was used.  These findings were confirmed with animal studies
Other symptoms of CS,-, intoxication reported in the early literature were
classified as "CS? insanity," "mental morbidity," "chronic neuritis." and
"acute mania."  Among rubber workers  in 1898, "mental morbidity" was

reported to have decreased by 86 percent ten years after improvements
in ventilation that decreased CSo concentrations from several hundred
to  less than 30 ppm (Davidson and Feinleib. 1972).

     The effect of 082 on the central nervous system is now generally
considered as polyneuritic (affecting a large number of spinal nerves).
Recent neurophysiological studies of  chronically poisoned workers  (ex-
posed to 20-40 ppm in the 1950s and 10-30 ppm in the 1960s) indicate im-
pairments at several  levels of the central  and peripheral nervous  system
(Seppalainen et al.,  1972)."'  The exact locus of the polyneuropathic type

of  lesion varies.  Of 9, 17, and 10 subjects exposed (from 0.5 to  2 years.
 Seppalainen, A. M.,  et al.  (1972),  "Neurophysiological Findings  in
 Chronic Carbon Disulfide Poisoning, A Descriptive Study," Work-Environ.
 Health. Vol. 9, p.  71.

                                    42

-------
3 to 10 years, and greater than 10 years,  respectively);  0, 3,  and 1 sub-

jects were neurophysiologically normal compared with a control group of

120 normal adults.  The reported observations show that the effect of CS2

on the nervous system cannot be considered specific.

                                •Jt"
     Tiller and coworkers (1968)  found that in men with more than 10

years employ in the viscose rayon industry, the death rate from coronary

heart disease (CHD) was 2.5 times greater in exposed workers than in

nonexposed workers.  Nearly half of the air-monitoring samples over a

period of 16 years reported levels greater than 20 ppm.  It is interest-

ing to note that the nonexposed rayon workers had a significantly higher

observed death rate than expected for CHD, as had other local men who were

not employed in the viscose rayon industry.  The male death rate from

cardiovascular diseases in those areas of England and Wales where viscose

rayon factories are situated is somewhat higher than the national rates

but is thought to be due to soft drinking water.  (Soft drinking water

frequently acquires high concentrations of heavy metals,  which have been

cited as contributors to CHD.)
                                  +
     Hernberg and coworkers (1970) reported an excess of coronary deaths

among 48 men who had been exposed to CS2 for at least five years and had

died under the age of 65.  The expected number of deaths from CHD was 15;

however, 25 were observed.  Examination of 343 viscose rayon workers, who

were matched with 343 control subjects from a paper mill revealed that

the subjects exposed to CS« had higher blood pressure and a slightly
*
 Tiller, J. R., R. Schilling, and J. Morris (1968), "Occupational Toxic
 Factor in Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease," Brit. Med.  J.,  Vol. 4,
 p. 407.
t
 Hernberg, S., et al. (1970), "Coronary Heart Disease Among Workers Ex-
 posed to Carbon Disulphide," Brit. J. Ind. Med..  Vol. 27, p.  313.


                                   43

-------
higher prevalence of electrocardiogram abnormalities.  Exposures to CS^

were from 20 ppm to 40 ppm in the 1950s and about 10 ppm to 30 ppm in

the 1960s.


     A follow-up study by Hernberg and coworkers  (1973)"'on the 343 exposed

workers showed that 16 men had died from CHD compared with 3 in the con-

trol cohort over  a five-and-one-half year period.  Other causes of death

were evenly distributed  (7 and 6) among both groups.  The control cohort

had an incidence of CHD  that was less than the national death statistics

(Finland), and this was  attributed to the occupational status.  The inci-

dence of CHD mortality was 6.7 percent and 2.6 percent for the two groups.

A further analysis of the data of Hernberg and coworkers indicated that

11 nonfatal first cardiac infarctions had occurred  in the exposed group

as compared with 4 in the control (Tolonen et al.,  1975).   The exposed

group also had a greater prevalence of angina (chest pains).


     Lieben and coworkers (1974)* evaluated the effects of the CS2 °n the

cardiovascular system of 1498 presently employed U.S. rayon workers com-

pared with 481 acetate workers.  An electrocardiogram, blood pressure,

total cholesterol, and occupational exposure history were obtained for

each worker.  The only statistically significant  finding was a higher

blood pressure (140/87)  in workers in the rayon plants than in workers

in the acetate plant  (135/83) .


     The question of whether  the association between CHD and CS9 is

causal is still addressed, although the circumstances favor such an

association.  Some biochemical mechanisms that add  credence to the cau-

sality are decreases  in  fibrinolytic activity (Brieger and Teisinger, 1967),
•/v
 Hernberg, S.,  et  al.  (1973),  "Excess Mortality  from Coronary  Heart  Disease

 in Viscose Rayon  Workers Exposed  to Carbon Disulfide7" Work-Environ.-

 Health, Vol.  10,  p.  93.
t
 Tolonen, M.,  et al.  (1975),  "A Follow-up  Study  of  Coronary  Heart  Disease

 in Viscose Rayon  Workers Exposed  to Carbon Disulfide," Brit.  J.  Ind. Med.,

 Vol.  32, p.  1.
$
 Lieben, J.,  et al .  (1974),  "Cardiovascular Effects of CS2 Exposure," J_._

 Occ.  Med., Vol. 16,  No.  7,  p. 449.

                                   44

-------
changes in lipid metabolism, elevation of blood pressure, and myocardial

effects through interference with catecholamine metabolism  (Magos,  1974).

     Another notable toxic effect of CSo is on the reproductive system.
The estrous cycle of rats was found distorted  (Vasileva. 1973).  Follow-

up studies on women workers exposed to greater than 10 ppm  and 4 ppm CS,-,

indicated greater disruption of  the menstrual  cycle and more pathological

changes in the cellular composition of vaginal smears than  in the control

groups.  Humans (Lancranjan. 1972) and rats have been shown to have changes

in spermatogenesis  (Rozewichi et al, 1973).:

     A synergism between 082 (20-25 pm)  and  H^S (20-25 ppm) has been

noted in rabbits exposed for four hours per day for 150 consecutive days

(Kuwai, I960).""  In the mixed gases group, reticulocyte count and globulin

increased, and total cholesterol rose on the 110th day and  continued to

rise for the remainder of the experiment.  No  abnormality was detected in

the separate groups except  for a slight elevation of total  cholesterol in

the H2S group, which eventually  returned to normal.

     CSn was detected in the urine of children in a study of persons

living near a Czechoslovakian industrial plant emitting 32  kg/h H9S and
 Magos,  L..  et al.  (1974).  "Half-Life of CS9 in Rats in Relation to Its
 Effect  on Brain Catecholamines," Int.  Arch. Arbeitsmed..  Vol.  32,  p.  289.
 Vasileva. I.  A. (1973).  "Effect of Small Concentrations of CS > and H2S on
 the Menstrual Function of  Women and the Estryl Cycle of Experimental
 Animals," Gigiena  i  Sanitaria. Vol. 7.  p.  24 (transl.  from Russian).

 Lancranian.  I.  (1972). "Alteration of  Spermatic Liquid in Patients Chron-
 ically  Poisoned by Carbon  Disulphide." Med. Lavoro. Vol.  63,  No. 12.  p.  29.

'^Rozewichi,  S.,  et  al .  (1973). "Effect  of Chronic Poisoning with Carbon
 Disulfide on the Hormone Activities of Rat Ovaries," Med.  Pr..  Vol. 24  ,
 p.  133.
 Kuwai,  S. (1960), "Experimental Studies on Gas Inhalation of Respective
 and Combined CS2 and H0S ." Shikoku Igaku Zasshi .  Vol. 16.  Suppl.  144. p.  64.

                                   45

-------
and 55.5 kg/h C$2•   The incidence of upper respiratory passage disease

was noted to be 10 percent higher in this industrial group than in a rural
                               V"
control group (Holasova, 1969).'


     Threshold Levels

     It is apparent that 20 ppm CS£ allows little if any margin of safety

for chronic C&2 exposure.  Current allowable concentrations for occupa-

tional exposures are 20 ppm in the United States, (ACGIH, 1971),  3 ppm

in the USSR, and 10 ppm in Czechoslovakia (Brieger and Teisinger, 1967).

The 20-ppm level has received considerable critisicm; Finnish authorities

reduced the level to 10 ppm in 1972 (Tolonen et al., 1975).

     In estimating the allowable concentration in the ambient atmosphere

from epidemiological studies of industrial exposures, one must consider

that the workers are (aside from exposure effects) normal, healthy males

performing manual operations, and that they are exposed less than eight

hours per day for five days per week.  In these groups, cardiovascular

and neurological effects have been noted from chronic (intermittent)

exposures approaching 10 ppm.  Disruption of the estrous cycle of working

women was also noted at exposures to 4 ppm.  Continual exposure  (i.e.,

24 hours/day) does not occur for the worker (i.e., 8 hours/working day);

thus reversible effects would tend to be restored on a diurnal basis until

an equilibrium has been established.  Using the 35 minute half-life for

CS2 in man established by Magos  (1974), the chronic damage must either

be irreversible or caused by a long-lived metabolite.  Tolonen et al.  (1975)
*
 Holasova, P.  (1969), "Pathology of Children in an Area Polluted with CS2
 and H2S  in Comparison with a Control Group," Cesk. Hyg., Vol. 14, p. 7;
 Vol. 8,  p. 260.

 ACGIH  (1971), "Documentation of Threshold Limit Values," 3rd edition
 (American Council of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists).

                                   46

-------
noted that 40 percent of his historically exposed group had not been


exposed for the f ive-and-one-hal f-year period in which the elevated CHD


mortality rate was significantly greater.  Thus the CHD effects appear


irreversible.  In contrast, some studies have noted reversible occurrences


at the biochemical level (i.e., mixed-function oxidase inhibition).  Re-


versible impairments would be continuous under constant exposure and thus,


in general, indistinguishable from irreversible alterations..  In rats

                                              o
continuously exposed to levels of 100 |_ig CS2/m  (0.03 ppm) the rate of


body weight increase and content of coproporphyrin in urine was decreased


(Misiakiewicz et al., 1971)*   Baikov (1974)"'' found eye sensitivity to


light reflexes affected at 10 ng/m^ (3 ppb) in humans.
     For continual exposure to CS,-,, the morbidity threshold effect  for


humans is presumably lower than 10 ppm.  A certain fraction of the  popula-

tion is predisposed to symptoms that continuous levels of CS2 may  further


aggravate  (e.g., hypertension, elevated cholesterol).  It appears  that


persons on mineral-deficient diets may also be more  susceptible  to  toxic


effects  (ACGIH,  1971).  To establish a critical margin of safety for  the


general population, further research on threshold effects to critical


subgroups needs  to be carried out.  In light  of the  above, an ambient


standard should  be developed that allows a magnitude of difference  for


chronic-intermittent versus chronic-continuous exposure, as well as


another magnitude  for critical subgroups that may be further impaired.


We  recommend  a  level equal to or  less  than 300 p,g CS2/m^-  Such  a  level

should provide  an  adequate health effects margin of  safety for the  general


population until further  studies  on continual exposure thresholds  are


performed.

Vf
 Misiakiewicz,  A., et al.  (1971), "Effect on  Animals of Prolonged  Exposure

  to Low Concentration of  CS2 in the Air,"  Roc. Pansstw. Zakl. Hig.,

 Vol.  22, No.  1, p. 7.


 Baikov, B. K.  (1974), "Hygienic Effect of Carbon Bisulfide and  Hydrogen

 Sulfide Simultaneously Present in Atmospheric Air," microfiche, transl.

  from Russian,  Information Systems Inc., Omaha, Nebraska.


                                   47

-------
     Because of the lack of data on chronic COS health effects, a margin

of safety should be established by analogy to CS2-  The basis for this

analogy is the similarity in chemical and physical properties, the possible

relationship in biochemical metabolism and mechanism of toxic effect

(reactive sulfur atom),  and the similarity in acute exposure thresholds

and symptomatology.  Using a ratio (CS?/COS) of molecular weights of 1.25

and a ratio of toxicity of 2 (reactive sulfur atoms),  we recommend an am-

bient level of 0.16 ppm COS (400 |_ig/nr) until further studies are performed.

     It should be noted that the maximum allowable concentration for CS~
                                       o
in the workplace in the USSR is 10 mg/m  (3.3 ppm) and in the ambient air

10 p.g/m   (3.3 ppb) (Baikov, 1974).   These concentrations are considered as

goals rather than as regulatory ceilings and are  frequently exceeded.


     Welfare Effects

     CS~ has received wide application as a fumigant pesticide in the con-

trol of mosquito larvae, wax moths, nematodes, ants, fungi, and flour

beetles.  The concentrations employed are quite high; generally greater

than 5000 ppm is required to produce the desired  effect.  CS2 is controlled

as a food additive for the fumigation of processed grains in the produc-

tion of fermented malt beverages under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos-
metic Act (Federal Register, 1964)."  Residues must be absent in the  fin-

ished beverages.

     €82  increases the efficiency of seed germination for Zea mays  (corn)

(Popescu  et al., 1971).   Concentrations of C&2 up to 10 percent stimulate
 Federal Register  (1964), "Fumigants for Processed Grains Used in the
 Production of Fermented Malt Beverages," Fed. Reg.,  Vol. 29, p. 7462.

 Popescu, V., et al.  (1971), "Influence of the Treatment with Some Chem-
 icals on the Seed Germination of Several Cultivated Plants," Ser. Biol.
 Vol. 16, p. 101.
                                   48

-------
C09 fixation in alfalfa leaves and higher concentrations stimulate the

formation of 1-alanine (Lehman et al.. 1972).""  Low seedling weight and
reduced glucose content were observed in wheat seeds that were treated

with high concentrations of CS 9 and stored for six months (Zaki and Nada,
      +
1964).   These studies indicate that  there would be little impact of CS2

on plants at expected ambient concentrations.

     Rauch  (1962) found 12 ppm COS in horseradish tissue and suggests the
substance as a defensive compound for plants.  In a study to characterize

odor-producing substances from cattle feedlots. Elliott and Travis (1973)
found COS produced in significant quantities.  COS is reported to have an
unpleasant  odor similar to that of rotten eggs; however, no threshold data

are reported in the literature.

     Pure COS has a foul etheral odor; however, according to Patty (1963).
it does not offer adequate warning at harmful concentrations.  A solution

of 1 mg CS2/per liter of water is said to be  the threshold for detection

by smell  (Vinogradov, 1966).  Baikov  (1974)  found an odor threshold of

0.08 mg/m^  in air.

     There  are reports in the literature concerning the corrosive prop-

erties of CS2 on metallic coatings during its manufacture; however, at
emission  concentrations (100 ppm) this effect would not be a problem.
 Lehman, J., et al.  (1972), "Effect of Some Vaporized Lipophilic Sol-
 vents on Carbon Dioxide Fixation by Alfalfa," Experientia. Vol. 28,
 No. 12, p. 1415.
 Zaki, M., and M. Nada  (1964), "Effect of CS9 on the Total Carbohydrate
 Content of Treated Wheat Seeds," Ann. Agr. Sci. (Cairo).  Vol.  6. No.  1.
 p. 1350.
 Vinogradov, P. B.  (1966). "New Experimental Data for Substantiating the
 Maximum Permissible Concentration of Carbon Disulfide in Water Basins,"
 Gigiena i. Sanitaria,  Vol. 31. p. 13.

                                   49

-------
Environmental Quality Aspects


     It appears that the primary anthropogenic controllable source for


CS,-, emissions is from viscose rayon manufacturing.  Emissions from re-


finery sulfur recovery plants, assuming Beavon catalyst degradation,


would  contribute approximately 30 percent of the anthropogenic emissions

in the Los Angeles basin.  For the five-day stagnation conditions pre-


viously given for the Los Angeles Basin (Estimates of Ambient Air Concen-

                                                    o
trations), the threshold odor concentration (80 ^ig/mj) would be exceeded.


Contributions from other sources do not appear to be significant, and


under the assumed conditions cf stagnation, our 300 p.g/m-' recommended


health effects threshold would not be exceeded.


     Little is known about the health effects of COS.  Because of its


significant emission from some nonselective reducing catalyst systems,


however, establishing the threshold effect is worthy of immediate con-


sideration.  Based on analogy to CS2- a 400 ug/rrr health effects level is


recommended until more data are available.  Under the worst case condi-


tions (as above) this level will not be exceeded.  The odor threshold is


not known, but, if similar to CS2? it will frequently be exceeded.


     Coal gasification plants may emit significant quantities of COS and


CS2 and may pose aesthetic problems  (odor) in the vicinity of the source

along the plume.  This will depend on the  sulfur content of the coal being

gasified.  Oil shale retorting and upgrading plants will also emit sig-


nificant quantities of CS? and COS, and likewise may pose aesthetic prob-

lems in the near vicinity.  In these plants, however, annual time-weighted


ambient air concentrations above 300 ug CS2/m  and 400 ug COS/nr should


not be exceeded.


     Due to the generally long environmental half-lives for each compound,


the transformations to l^S and S02 would  occur, but after appreciable


dilution of the vapors in the atmosphere.
                                   50

-------
                            IV  REFERENCES
ACGIH (1971), "Documentation of Threshold Limit Values," 3rd edition
     (American Council of Government and Industrial Hygienists).

Allen, E. R., R.  D.  McQuigg, and R.  D.  Cadle (1972), "The Photooxidation
     of Sulfur Dioxide in Air, Chemosphere,  Vol.  1, p.  25.

Austin, G. T. (1974), "The Industrially Significant Organic Chemicals--
     Part 2," Chem.  Eng.. p. 127 (February 18,  1974).

Baikov, B. K. (1974), "Hygienic Effect of Carbon Bisulfide and Hydrogen
     Sulfide Simultaneously Present in Atmospheric Air," microfiche,
     transl. from Russian, Information Systems  Inc., Omaha, Nebraska.

Beavon, D. K., and P. P.  Vaell (1972),  "The Beavon Sulfur Removal Process
     for Purifying Glaus Plant Tail Gas," paper presented at the 37th
     Midyear Meeting, American Petroleum Institute Division of Refining,
     May 1972.

Beers, W. D. (1973), "Characterization of Glaus Plant Emissions," EPA
     Report No.  EPA-72-73-188, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
     D.C. (April 1973).

Brieger, H.  (1961),  "Chronic Carbon Disulfide Poisoning," J. Occup.  Med. ,
     Vol. 3, p.  302.

Brieger, H., and J.  Teisinger (1967), Toxicology of Carbon Disulfide
     (Excerpta Medica Foundation, New York, New York).

Browning, E. (1965), Toxicity and Metabolism of Industrial Solvents
     (Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, New York).

Bureau of Mines (1973),  "Fuel Oil Sales, Annual, 1973."

	  (1974),  "Burner Fuel Oils,  1974," Mineral Industrial Surveys,
     Bureau of Mines, Petroleum Products Survey, Nos. 82, 86, and 88.

CEH (1973), Chemical Economics Handbook (Stanford Research Institute,
     Menlo Park, California).
                                   51

-------
CRC (1971), Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Chemical Rubber Company,
     Cleveland, Ohio).

Cohen et al.  (1959), "Biochemical Mechanisms in Chronic Carbon Bisulfide
     Poisoning," Am. Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc. J.,  Vol.  20, p.  303.

Colony (1974), "An Environmental Impact Analysis for a Shale Oil Complex
     at Parachute Creek, Colorado," Colony Development Corporation,
     Atlantic Richfield Company.

Dalvi, R. R., et al. (1975), "Toxicological Implications of the Mixed-
     Function Oxidase Catalyzed Metabolism of Carbon Disulfide," Chem.
     Biol. Int., Vol. 10,  p. 347.

	 (1974), "Studies of the Metabolism of Carbon Disulfide by
     Rat Liver Microsomes," Life Sci.,  Vol. 14, p. 1785.

Davidson, M., and M. Feinleib (1972), "Carbon Disulfide Poisoning:  A
     Review," Am. Heart J., Vol. 83, No. 1, p. 100.

Degent, C.,  C. Rouse, and C. Lebras (1962), "Modification in Properties
     of Coke-Oven Gas During Underground Storage," Rev. Combust.,  Vol.
     16, No. 1,  p. 11.

Demerjian, K. L. , J. A. Kerr, and J. G. Calver (1974), "The Mechanism of
     Photochemical Smog Formation," Adv. Environ. Sci. Tech., Vol. 4,
     p. 1.

DeSorgo, M., et  al.  (1965), "The Photolysis of Carbon Disulfide and Carbon
     Disulfide-Oxygen Mixtures," Can. J. Chem., Vol. 43, p. 1886.

Directory of Chemical Products  (1975),  Stanford Research Institute,
     Menlo Park,  California.

El Gazzar, R., et al.  (1973), "Changes  in  Zinc and Serum Proteins Due to
     Carbon Disulfide Poisoning," Brit. J. Ind. Med., Vol.  30, p.  284.

Elliot, L.  F., and T. A.  Travis  (1973), "Detection of Carbonyl Sulfide
     and  Other Gases Emanating  from Beef Cattle Manure," Soil Sci. Soc.
     Am.  Proc.,  Vol.  37,  p.  700.

El Paso (1974),  "Revised  Report  on  Environmental  Factors,  Burnham Coal
     Gasification Project,"  El  Paso Natural Gas Company, El Paso, Texas.

EPA  (1975),  Environmental Protection Agency,  unpublished data.

                                    52

-------
           (1974), "Symposium Proceedings:   Environmental Aspects of Fuel
     Conversion Technology (May 1974, St.  Louis, Missouri)," Report
     No. EPA-650-2-73-118, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
     D.C.  (October 1974).

Exxon (1975), "Evaluation of Pollution Control in Fossil Fuel Conversion
     Processes—Liquefaction:  Section 2,  SRC Process," Report No.  EPA-
     650/2 74-009-f, Exxon Research and Engineering Company (March 1975).

Federal Register (1964), "Fumigants for Processed Grains Used in the
     Production of Fermented Malt Beverages," Fed. Reg., Vol. 29, p. 7462.

Perm, R. J.  (1957), "The Chemistry of Carbonyl Sulfide," Chem. Rev.,
     Vol.  57, p. 621.

Field, E., and E.  A. Sawhon (1974), "Carbonyl Sulfide as a Chemical
     Building Block," paper presented at the Symposium on New Sulfur
     Chemistry, 167th ACS National Meeting, Los Angeles, California, 1974.

Foreman, W.  (1886), "Notes of a Fatal Case of Poisoning by Bisulfide
     of Carbon," Lancet, Vol. 2, p. 118.

Galivets,  L.  S., Yu. I.  Usatenko, and D. V. Galivets (1972), "Investiga-
     tion of Kinetics of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Carbon Bisulfide," Soviet
     Chem. Ind., Vol. 48, No. 12, p.  730.

Hamilton,  A., and H. L.  Hardy (1974), Industrial Toxicology, 3rd ed.
     (Publishing Sciences Group Inc., Acton, Massachusetts).

Hayashi, E.,  et al. (1971), "Acute Toxicity of Carbonyl Sulfide Towards
     Animals," Oyo Yakuri, Vol. 5, No. 3,  p. 435.

Hernberg,  S., et al. (1973), "Excess Mortality from Coronary Heart
     Disease in Viscose Rayon Workers Exposed to Carbon Bisulfide,," Work-
     Environ.-Health, Vol. 10, p. 93.

	 (1970), "Coronary Heart Bisease Among Workers Exposed to
     Carbon Bisulphide," Brit. J. Ind. Med.,  Vol. 27, p. 313.

Holasova, P. (1969), "Pathology of Children in an Area Polluted with CS.->
     and HoS in Comparison with a Control Group," Cesk.  Hyg.,  Vol.  14,
     p. 7, Vol. 8, p. 260.

Koutsoukos, E.P., et al. (1975), "Assessment of Catalysts for Control of
     NOX from Stationary Power Plants," Report No.  EPA-650-2  75 001-a,
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, B.C.

                                   53

-------
Kuwai, S. (1960), "Experimental Studies on Gas Inhalation of Respective
     and Combined CS2 and H2S," Shikoku Igaku Zasshi, Vol.  16,  Suppl.  144,
     p. 64.

Lancranjan,  I.  (1972), "Alteration of Spermatic Liquid in Patients
     Chronically Poisoned by Carbon Bisulphide," Mcd. Lavoro, Vol. 63,
     No.  12, p.  29.

Landrum,  L.  H. ,  et al. (1973), "The Cleanair Sulfur Process," paper
     presented at the 74th AICLE Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana,
     March 1973.

Lehman, J.,  et al. (1972), "Effect of Some Vaporized Lipophilic Solvents
     on Carbon Dioxide Fixation by Alfalfa," Experientia, Vol.  28, No. 12,
     p. 1415.

Leighton, P. A.  (1961). Photochemistry of Air Pollution (Academic Press,
     New York, New York).

Leo, A.,  C.  Hansch, and D. Elkins (1971), "Partition Coefficients and
     Their Uses," Chem. Rev., Vol. 71, No. 6.

Lieben, J. (1974), "Third International Symposium on Toxicology of Carbon
     Disulphide," Arch. Environ. Health, Vol. 29, p. 173.

Lieben, J., et al. (1974), "Cardiovascular Effects of CS2 Exposure,"
     J. Occ. Med., Vol. 16, No. 7, p. 449.

Mack,  T., K. Freundt, and D. Henschler (1974), "Inhibition of Oxidative
     N-Demethylation  in Man by Low Doses of  Inhaled Carbon Disulfide,"
     Biochem. Pharmac., Vol.  23, p.  607

Mackay, D., and A. W. Wolkoff  (1973), "Rate  of Evaporation of Low Solubil-
     ity  Contaminants  from Water Bodies  to Atmosphere," Environ.  Sci.
     Tech., Vol.  7,  p. 611.

Magos, L.,  et al.  (1974), "Half-Life of  CS2  in Rats  in Relation  to Its
     Effect on Brain Catecholamines," Int. Arch. Arbeitsmed., Vol. 32,
     p.  289.

McKee, R. (1941),  "Solubility of Carbon  Disulfide Vapor  in Body  Fluids
      and  Tissues," J.  Ind. Hyg., Vol.  23,  p.  151.

McKee, R.,  et al.  (1943), "A  Solvent Vapor:   Carbon  Disulfide--Absorption,
     Elimination, Metabolism  and Mode of Action," J.  Am. Med. Assoc. ,
     Vol.  122, p.  217.
                                  54

-------
Mlsiakiewicz, Z. , et al. (1971), "Effect on Animals of Prolonged Exposure
     to Low Concentration of CS2 in the Air," Roc. Pansstw. Zakl. Hig..
     Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 7.

Momot, j. (1964), "Carbonyl Sulfide, a Product of the Activity of Volcanic
     Fumaroles," Bull. Mens. Soc. Linneenne Lyon. Vol. 33, No. 8, p. 326.

Nordlie, B. E. (1971), "The Composition of the Magmatic Gas of Kilauea and
     Its Behavior in the Near Surface Environment," Am. J. Sci. , Vol. 271,
     p. 417.

NPN (1975), National Petroleum News Factbook (May 1975).

OGJ (1974), Oil and Gas Journal, pp. 84-103 (April 1, 1974).

Olszyna, K. J., and J. Heicklen  (1970),"The Reaction of Ozone with Carbon
     Disulfide," J. Phys. Chem. . Vol. 74, p. 4188.

ORNL (1975), "ORNL Tobacco Smoke Research Program Summary Report," Oak
     Ridge National Laboratory, March 1975.

Patty, F. A. (1963), Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. 2nd ed., Vol. 2
     (Wiley Interscience, New York, New York).

Pergal, M., et al. (1972), "Carbon Disulfide Metabolites Excreted in the
     Urine of Exposed Workers," Arch. Environ. Health, Vol. 25, p. 38.

Perkins, H. C. (1974), Air Pollution. Chap. 8, "Plume Dispersion" (McGraw-
     Hill Book Company, New York, New York).

Phillipp, B., and H. Dautzenberg (1966), "Zur Bildungsgeschwindigkeit von
     Na-Athylmonothiocarbonat imVergleich zu Na-Athylxanthogenat,"
     Z. Physik. Chem.  (Leipzig), Vol. 231, p. 270.

	 (1965), "Untersuchungen zur Bildung und Zersetzung von Mono-
     thiocarbonat in wassriger Lbsung," Z. Physik. Chem. (Leipzig), Vol.
     229, p. 210.

Pickren, R. A., and R. F. Matson (1964), "Chromatograph Abroad a Liquid
     Sulfur Ship," Chem. Eng. Progr.. Vol. 62, No. 2, p. 95.

Popescu, V., et al. (1971), "Influence of the Treatment with Some Chemicals
     on the Seed Germination of Several Cultivated Plants," Ser. Biol..
     Vol. 16, p. 101.
                                    55

-------
Radtke, R., et al. (1963), The Chemical Processes During the Aging of
     Roasted Coffee/1 Z. Lebensn. Untersuch. Forsch.,  Vol.  119, p. 293.

Rauch, G. (1962), "The Defensive Substances of Plants, III:  Horse Radish
     Gas," Z.  Naturforsch.,  Vol. 17, p. 800

Ronkainen, P.  (1973), "Formation of Volatile Sulfur Compounds During
     Pressure Cooking of Grain-Water Mixtures," J. Inst.  Brew., London,
     Vol. 79,  No. 3, p.  200.

Rozewichi, S., et al. (1973), "Effect of Chronic Poisoning with Carbon
     Bisulfide on the Hormone Activities of Rat Ovaries," Med.  Pr. ,
     Vol. 24,  No. 2, p.  133.

Scheel, L. (1967), "Experimental CS  Poisoning in Rabbits,  Its Mechanism
     and Similarities with Human Case Reports," in Toxicology of Carbon
     Bisulfide. H. Brieger and J. Teisinger, eds., pp. 107-114 (Excerpta
     Medica Foundation,  New York, New York).

Seppalainen, A. M., et al. (1972), "Neurophysiological Findings in Chronic
     Carbon Disulfide Poisoning, A Descriptive Study," Work-Environ.-Health,
     Vol. 9, p. 71.

Simon, K. (1961), "Chronische Vergiftung durch Schwefelkohlenstoff,"
     Med. Monatschr., Vol. 16, p. 810, cited in Toxicology and Metabolism
     of Industrial Solvents,  E.  Browning, ed., p. 704  (Elsevier Publishing
     Company,   New York, New York).

SRI (1975), "STAR Ranking Objective Subsystem," Draft  Report, EPA Contract
     68-01-2940, Task 023, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park,
     California.

SRI (1973), "Meeting California's Energy Requirements, 1975-2000," SRI
     Project ECC-2355, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California.

Teisinger, J., and B. Soucek (1949), "Absorption and Elimination of  Carbon
     Disulfide in Man,"  J. Ind.  Hyg.. Vol.  31, p. 67.

Teisinger, J.  (1974), "1972  Yant Memorial Lecture—New Advances in Toxi-
     cology of Carbon Disulfide," Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc. J.,  Vol. 35,  No. 2,
     P. 55.

Tiller, J. R., R. Schilling,  and J.  Morris (1968), "Occupational Toxic
     Factor in Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease," Brit. Med.  J. ,
     Vol. 4, p. 407.

                                   56

-------
Tolonen, M. , et al. (1975), "A Follow-up Study of Coronary Heart Disease
     in Viscose Rayon Workers Exposed to Carbon Disulfide," Brit. J. Ind.
     Med.,  Vol. 32, p. 1.

Treiber, E., et al. (1957), "UV and IR-Absorption von Kohlenstoffdiselenid,"
     Acta Chem. Scand.,  Vol. 11, p. 752.

Vasileva, I. A, (1973),  "Effect of Small Concentrations of CS2 and H2S on
     the Menstrual Function of Women and the Estryl Cycle of Experimental
     Animals," Gigiena i Sanitaria, Vol. 7, p.  24 (transl. from Russian).

Vigliani, E. C. (1954),  "Carbon Disulfide Poisoning in Viscose Rayon Fac-
     tories," Brit. J. Ind. Med., Vol. 11, p.  235.

Vinogradov, P.  B.  (1966), "New Experimental Data for Substantiating the
     Maximum Permissible Concentration of Carbon Disulfide in Water Basins,"
     Gigiena i Sanitaria, Vol. 31, p.  13.

Westenberg, A.  A., and N. DeHaas (1969), "Atom-Molecule Kinetics Using
     ERS Detection, V Results for 0 + OCS, 0 + N02 and H + C2H4," J. Chem.
     Phys., Vol. 50, p.  707.

Wood, W. P., and J. Heicklen (1971a),  Kinetics and Mechanism of the
     Carbon Disulfide-Oxygen Explosion," J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 75, p. 861.

	 (1971b), "The Photooxidation of Carbon Disulfide," J. Phys.
     Chem.,  Vol. 75, p. 85.

           (1973/74), "The Photooxidation of CS2 at 2139 5," J. Photochem..
     Vol. 2, p. 173.

Zaki, M., and M. Nada (1964), "Effect of CS2 on the Total Carbohydrate
     Content of Treated Wheat Seeds," Ann. Agr. Sci. (Cairo), Vol. 6,
     No. 1, p.  135.
                                   57

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NOL
 EPA-600/9-78-009
             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
              PB 257 947/2BA	
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Carbon Disulfide, Carbonyl Sulfide:
  Literature Review and Environmental  Assessment
             5. REPORT DATE
              June 1978 issuing date
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Thomas  0.  Peyton, Robert V. Steele,  and
  William R.  Mabey
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Stanford Research "Institute
  Menlo  Park,  California   94025
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
               68-01-2940, Task 023.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental Protection Agency
  401 M.  Street, S.W
  Washington,  D.C.    20460
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                 Final
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 t6. ABSTRACT
      Carbon disulfide  (CS2) and carbonyl sulfide  (COS)  are volatile substances of mod-
 erate toxicity,  odor,  and environmental lifetimes  (days).   Vapors emitted  from sources
 are expected  to  follow normal atmospheric dispersion principles.  Each  compound is
 produced from anthropogenic as well as natural  sources.   The most significant  anthropo
 genie emission for  CS2 is from commercial usages where  the atmosphere serves  as  the
 natural sink.  The  use of nonselective reducing catalysts  may emit significant quanti-
 ties of COS.  Little  is known of the toxic  thresholds for  COS; however,  the  signifi-
 cant industrial  usage  of CS2 has provided appreciable industrial hygiene records on
 effects.  Based  on  industrial effects records,  and until better data on chronic  ex-
 posures become available,  we tentatively recommend that  limiting long-term averaged
 concentrations to 300  p-g/m-^ CS2 should be sufficient for protection against  adverse
 health effects.  By chemical and biological analogy to CS2,  the corresponding  level
 for COS would be 400
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                        c.  COS AT I Held/Group
  Ecology
  Organic  Compound
  Assessments
  Criteria
  Standards
    Carbon  Disulfide
    Carbonyl  Sulfide
    CS2
    COS
    Energy  systems
  6F
  7C
 10A
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Document is available to the public  through
the National Technical Information Services
Springfield,  VA  22151	
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
unclassified
21 NO. OF PAGES
    63 -
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
unclassified
                           22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                  *U.<
                                                  260-880/76

-------