V-/EPA
                                   United States
                                   Environmental Protection
                                   Agency
                                   Robert S Kerr Environmental Research
                                   Laboratory
                                   Ada OK 74820
                                   Research and Development
                                  EPA-600/S2-81-058 June 1981
Project  Summary
                                  Areal  Predictions  of Water  and
                                  Solute  Flux  in  the
                                  Unsaturated  Zone

                                  Arthur W  Warnck and Azizolah Amoozegar-Fard
                                    This investigation was undertaken
                                  to develop procedures for evaluating
                                  distribution of water and salt fluxes
                                  over land areas. Relevant applications
                                  include numerical simulations and
                                  sampling in fields of large areal extent.
                                  The primary focus is on irrigated lands
                                  including effects of salinization and
                                  crops on the ground and surface
                                  waters. The study was in three parts:
                                  1) observations of distributions for a
                                  variety of soil physical parametersand
                                  inference on sampling; 2) simulations
                                  of water and salt fluxes for nondeter-
                                  ministic systems; and 3) a sensitivity
                                  analysis for drainage. The major em-
                                  phasis was placed on Part 2.
                                    Simulations of water and salt fluxes
                                  were made using the "crude" Monte
                                  Carlo technique. For infiltration, "Phil-
                                  ip's" equation was utilized in a scaled
                                  form by solving one time.  Individual
                                  simulations were made algebraically
                                  without repeating the laborious steps
                                  of resolving the unsaturated moisture
                                  flow equation each time. Similarly,
                                  results for the nonlinear drainage case
                                  were solved based on only one finite
                                  difference determination. The Monte
                                  Carlo simulation was carried  out by
                                  simple interpolation from the one
                                  nonlinear solution. Unfortunately, no
                                  great short-cut was found for cyclic or
                                  seasonal irrigation  regimes, although
                                  some  interesting  results based on
                                  linearized solutions were found  for
                                  high frequency water applications.
                                    Salt distributions were calculated
                                  for cases of equal irrigation amounts
                                  over time but with intake rate varying
                                  over space. Deterministic calculations
                                  based on the mean velocity and appar-
                                  ent diffusion coefficient gave errone-
                                  ous results compared to the "average"
                                  values over the field for both salt
                                  profiles or fluxes. The true "average"
                                  by depth  for a given time is much more
                                  dispersed, with more salts reaching
                                  very deep depths and also with more
                                  salts remaining close to the surface
                                  when pulses of salt are added. Simi-
                                  larly, the mass  emission of salts aver-
                                  aged over a field for a given depth
                                  appear earlier  in time and taper off
                                  more gradually for a pulse input than
                                  deterministic calculations based on
                                  mean velocities would indicate.
                                    This Project  Summary was devel-
                                  oped by EPA's Roberts. Kerr Environ-
                                  mental Research Laboratory, Ada,
                                  OK. to announce key findings of the
                                  research project that is  fully docu-
                                  mented in a separate report of  the
                                  same title (see Project Report ordering
                                  information at back}.

                                  Introduction
                                    This two-year study dealt with areal
                                  predictions of water  and solute fluxes
                                  within the soil profile The project was
                                  designed to develop methods to account
                                  quantitatively for the inherent variability
                                  of soils over a  region  —  such as an
                                  irrigated field or  larger. Two very impor-
                                  tant observations should  be made in
                                  terms of trends of current research and
                                  awareness since the inception of this
                                  project: (1) there has been a tremendous

-------
increase of interest in variability of soil
properties;  and (2) there has been an
equally  impressive increase of interest
among hydrologists and soil scientists
with regard to geostatistical techniques
which were largely ignored until recently.
  Soil scientists (and  farmers) have
always recognized that soils are hetero-
geneous. The approach to the problem
has necessarily been almost universally
deterministic in nature. The procedure
has generally been to sample, average
the samples, and use the results to
make calculations. For example,  if a
mass flux of salts is needed, the land
area is  multiplied by the "average"
profile results to get total emissions.
That such an approach may not give the
right answer is  stated in elementary
works on stochastic processes (e.g.
Hammersly  and  Handscomb,  1964, p.
13) and is demonstrated in the case of
mean water flux by Warricketal.(1977b)
and in results from this project. In some
cases, a  choice other than the arithmetic
mean may  be appropriate; in  other
cases,  no  "average"  value may be
satisfactory to obtain an overall response
or integrated estimate.  Efforts to ade-
quately  assess confidence of results
have been generally lacking.
  The techniques within this projectare
somewhat  intermediate between the
deterministic  and the geostatistical
methods. Ramifications  of spatial varia-
bility are pursued in terms of water and
salt fluxes,  primarily by Monte Carlo
simulations. It  is hoped that sampling
and confidence intervals  can be obtained
more efficiently in the future, by  taking
advantage of  what  is known of the
spatial structure and by using geostatis-
tical techniques (Journel and Huijbregts,
1978).
  These problems of area distribution
and predictions encompass all aspects
of earth sciences. An immediate and
obvious  connection between soil  physi-
cal properties and soil maps exists  and
suggests  mutual benefits for  close
cooperation between classifiers and the
soil physicists.  Not only is this true for
soil physical measurement, but also for
other soil properties, e.g., fertility level,
chemical activity and distributions of
biomass and microbes.


Conclusions
  Observed variations of soil parameters
in the literature  were reasonably con-
sistent when more than  one source was
found. Generally these parameters can
be grouped into three classes:
1. Low variability — (Coefficient of
   variation less than 20%)
     Bulk density
     Water content at a zero tension
2. Medium variability — (Coefficient of
   variation 20-75%)
     Textures (sand, silt or clay)
     Field water content
     Water content at specified tension
      between 0.1-15 bars
3. High variability — (Coefficient of
   variation greater than 100%)
     Saturated hydraulic conductivity
     Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity
     Apparent diffusion coefficient
     Pore water velocity
     Electrical conductivity of extract
     Scaling coefficients.
  Sample numbers may be estimated
assuming independence and that the
central limit theorem applies, by
            N = t02sVd2
where N is the number of samples, ta is
the "Student's t"  with n-1 degrees of
freedom at a probability level of a, s  is
the standard deviation of the mean, and
d is a specified limit. Table 1  shows an
analysis of the number of samples
required to estimate the mean values of
selected soil properties within  10 per
cent at the 0.05 significance level.
  Scaling techniques offer distinc
advantages in terms of economy o
calculation and in synthesizing large
volumes of data. Figure 1 demonstrate!
the results of scaling the hydraulic hea<
values for 840 data points. The scalinc
(based on the assumption that the
internal geometry for similar medij
differs only by the characteristics size
process coalesces the data points into i
curvilinear function as shown in Figure
1, A & B. In this particular data set the
sum of squares of the scaled data was
reduced by 80 percent over the same
form  of equation for the non-scale(
data.
  Solute movement is a function of soi
water flux and apparent diffusion coef
ficient. Use of the deterministic value o
these parameters can result in erroneous
estimates  of solute concentration ant
movement when the pore-water velocit'
and apparent diffusion are highly vari
able. Figures 2A and 2B showthe solute
concentrations with depth  after five
days  using  a deterministic approacf
compared  to the mean values for step
Table 1.     Summary of Approximate Number of Samples Required to Estimate
           Mean Values  Within 10% at 0.05 Significant Level (After
           GUMAA. 1978)
Soil Depth, cm
Parameters
Low Variation
Bulk density


Medium Variation
In situ field
capacity

In situ available
water capacity

15 bars


% clay


% silt


% sand


High Variation
Ksat

Field

1
2
3

1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3

1
2
30

1
1
1

10
12
10
21
55
47
20
25
23
25
28
20
20
16
8
15
19
1

110
119
60

1
1
1

28
23
9
43
36
31
55
78
19
49
91
18
57
61
20
28
16
1

150
49
90

1
1
1

24
61
15
35
110
33
33
68
31
33
104
24
66
88
47
13
21
3

362
155
120

1
1
1

47
49
10
55
78
30
57
57
35
51
36
36
122
83
28
27
23
2

635
102
150

1
1
1

2
75
2.4
45
116
45
47
125
30
47
110
36
71
104
40
43
47
3

155
560

-------
    7.0
OS
    0.6
    0.4
02
                        \
                                                     All 6 Soil Depths
                                                     840 Data Points
                                 t

                                 •
 o
            SS = / Ox706
            h = 800((I-S)-2.19(I-S*)+1,01(I-S3)
                            —0.385(/-S4)]S~1
 a  o.o
                                              1
                  -700         -200         -300
                                 Head /?r,i(cm)
                                                    -400
             -500
           SS = 2.0x705
           h = -6020[(I-S)-2.14(I-S2)+2.04(I-S3)

                             —0.694(/-S4)]S~1
                 -700
                          -200         -300
                         Scaled Head ^,
-400
-500
cigure
        Soil water  characteristics data  for six depths  of  Panoche  soil:
        (A) unsealed and (B) scaled.
                                                                                   200
                                                                                  400
                                                                                 Figure 2.
                                                                                        Mean Value
                                                                                        Deterministic
                                                                                                             B
                                                                                         Salt  concentration with
                                                                                         depth for a "step input"
                                                                                         (A) and a  "pulse input"
                                                                                         IB) after 5 days
and pulse inputs. The true means were
evaluated using the Monte Carlo simu-
lations in which an average of 2000 salt
profiles is calculated for each case. For
both step and pulse inputs, the solute
concentration at larger depth is greater
for the mean values than the determi-
nistic solution. The depth at which c/c0
= 0.5 is about 220 cm for the determi-
nistic and 110 cm for the mean value for
step input, a consequence of averaging
in some of the high velocity sites. For the
pulse input, the maximum concentration
for the mean value is closer to the soil
surface although it is less than the
deterministic value. In fact, there is no
single value of pore-water velocity that
could give the shape of the true mean
for this example.

Recommendations
  The variability in data of soil param-
eters should  always be included in
addition to mean values when reporting
environmental data. Information regard-
ing the frequency distribution and/or
the spatial distributions of the data
should be included.
  Sensitivity analysis should be con-
ducted to  evaluate the behavior of de-
pendent variables in relation to changes
in the independent variable. Relative
sensitivity is more meaningful when the
range of variability is masked by the
numerical magnitude of the parameter.
  Techniques such as geostatistics
should be examined  in soil science to
provide basic descriptions of soil physi-
cal properties and for integrating over
large land areas.

References
Gumaa, G.S. 1978. SpatialVariabilityof
    In situ Available Water. Ph.D.  Dis-
    sertation, University of Arizona.
            > US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1981-757-012/7148

-------
        140 pages. (No. 78-24, 365, Xerox
        University Microfilms, Ann Arbor,
        Ml 48106).
    Hammersly, J.M. and D.C. Handscomb.
        1964.  Monte Carlo  Methods.
        Metheum and Co., London.
    Journel, A.G. and CJ. Huijbregts. 1978.
        Mining Geostatistics. Academic
        Press, New York. 600 pages.
    Warrick, A.W., G.J. Mullen, and D.R.
        Nielsen. 1977b. Predictions of  the
        Soil Water Flux Based Upon Field-
        Measured Soil-Water Properties.
        Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 41:14-19.
               Arthur W. Warrick and Azizolah Amoozegar-Fard are with the Department of
                 Soils, Water, and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
               Arthur Hornsby is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
               The complete report, entitled "Area! Predictions of Water and Solute Flux in the
                 UnsaturatedZone, "(Order No. PB 8 J -191 124; Cost: $9.50, subject to change)
                 will be available only from.
                       National Technical Information Service
                       5285 Port Royal Road
                       Springfield,  VA 22161
                       Telephone- 703-487-4650
               The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                       Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       P. O Box 1198
                       Ada, OK 74820
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
    Center for Environmental Research
    Information
    Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
'Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
       UiJCAQi  Jl,
 .
Si'-'
                                   t »'

-------