United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Municipal
Pollution Control (WH-547)
Washington DC 20460
September
1985
c/EPA
Innovative and Alternative
Technology Projects:
1985 Progress Report
832R85107
-------
SEPTEMBER 1985
INNOVATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY
PROJECTS: 1985 PROGRESS REPORT
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF MUNICIPAL POLLUTION CONTROL
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460
-------
PREFACE
The Office of Municipal Pollution Control issues this annual
summary to provide interested parties with an overview of
progress in the implementation of Innovative and Alternative
(I/A) technologies under provisions of the Clean Water Act.
The report is based upon information from grant awards
through March for the year of issue as provided by state
agencies and EPA regional offices. State, EPA region, and
EPA headquarters staff have worked diligently to make the
listings as accurate and helpful as possible. Richard E.
Thomas, National I/A coordinator, who is listed in Table 8,
should be contacted to report errors, omissions, or
suggestions to improve the usefulness of the report.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
OVERVIEW 1
PROGRAM INFORMATION 2
USING THE INFORMATION 3
Table 1 - Innovative Technology Projects
Funded Less Than 10 Times 5
Table 2 - Summary of Innovative Technologies
Funded 10 or More Times 17
Table 3 - Selected Operating Innovative
Technology Projects Funded
10 or More Times 18
Table 4 - Summary of Alternative Technology
Projects 19
Table 5 - Selected Operating Alternative
Technology Projects 20
Table 6 - Field Test Projects 23
Table 7 - 100% M/R Requests 25
Table 8 - EPA and State I/A Technology
Coordinators and Contacts 26
11
-------
OVERVIEW
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
(P.L. 92-500) authorized a major Federal funding program to
abate water pollution from municipal treatment facilities.
The language of P. L. 92-500 sent a clear message that use of
the federal grant funds authorized by this law should
encourage implementation of alternative technologies.
Specific provisions of the CWA of 1977 established a
three-year test program that included a financial incentive,
a mandatory reserve fund, and the authority to federally fund
correction of failures. Alternative technology projects were
eligible by definition and were named in the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regulations detailing the provisions
of the I/A program. Individual projects or parts of projects
could gain eligibility by being designated as innovative on a
case-by-case basis.
The 1981 amendments to the CWA continued and strengthened the
statutory mandate to encourage use of I/A technologies. The
I/A provisions of the CWA of 1977 were extended through
fiscal year 1985 with changes that increased the financial
incentives and added a provision to fund a new category of
projects designated as field testing. The mandatory
set-aside was increased to four percent. The bonus grant for
I/A projects became a mandatory 20 percent of eligible costs
on October 1, 1984. Recognizing a need for flexibility, the
Congress provided states the option to increase the mandatory
four percent set-aside up to a seven and one-half percent
maximum. The field testing program provides a mechanism to
verify the basis of design for promising advances in
treatment technology to reduce the risk of failure before
funding construction of many similar projects.
In summary, there has been a consistent statutory trend from
1972 to the present for the purpose of directing federal
funds to the implementation of innovations which are
promising, but unproven for the proposed use, as well as
proven but comparatively unknown alternatives for wastewater
treatment. The increasingly stronger mandates of Congress
have had substantial effects in a comparatively short time.
Response to the I/A program at the local and state level has
resulted in over 3,500 grant awards for I/A technologies from
inception of the program on October 1, 1978 through March of
1985. There is every indication that the national response
to the program will encourage the Congress to continue strong
legislative support when it considers further authorization
of the program.
-------
PROGRAM INFORMATION
The I/A program is now an integral part of the overall
construction grants program. Most parts of the program are
reaching stability while the field test and 100-percent
modification/replacement grant activities are in a state of
transition. The basic provisions of the 1977 law are stable
as evidenced by the award of over 3,500 grants to design
and/or construct over 1,600 facilities with innovative or
alternative components. Over $410 million of set-aside funds
have been used to provide the I/A bonus for eligible
components of these projects. Several awards have been
made under the provision to provide 100-percent modification
and replacement (M/R) funding to correct failures of
innovative or alternative components. With over 300 of the
I/A-funded facilities now in operation, it is reassuring that
there have been less than twenty requests for 100-percent M/R
funding. The new field test program established by the 1981
law is a new vehicle for verifying design of innovative
projects.
-------
USING THE INFORMATION
Recognizing the value of specific project information, the
Office of Municipal Pollution Control (OMPC) has compiled
several tabulations to provide summary information on the I/A
program.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 present information on projects funded as
innovative.
Table 1. Innovative Technology Projects Funded Less Than Ten
Times.
Table 2. Summary of Innovative Technologies Funded Ten or
More Times.
Table 3. Selected Operating Innovative Technology Projects
Funded Ten or More Times.
Table 1 lists the type of technology, location, design flow,
basis for approval as innovative, consulting engineering
firm, and whether the project is in operation. Table 2 is
a numerical summary of those facilities utilizing an
innovative technology which has been funded ten or more
times. This listing is arrayed by the EPA regions and states
to show the geographic distribution of facilities using these
technologies. Table 3 provides additional information as to
location, size"] and the consulting firm for selected
operating facilities using innovative technologies funded ten
or more times.
Tables 4 and 5 present information on alternative technology
projects.
Table 4. Summary of Alternative Technology Projects.
Table 5. Selected Operating Alternative Technology Projects.
In Table 4, a numerical summary of alternative technology
projects is presented, while a list of operating facilities
is presented in Table 5.
Table 6 lists the location, status, and technology for field
test projects.
Table 7 lists the location, status, and technology for 100%
M/R requests.
-------
Table 8 lists the appropriate state and EPA contacts from
which additional information on the I/A program can be
obtained.
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Plow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
AERATIOK/MIXINC
Dome Diffused
Meriden, CT
(l)Brookton, MA
(l)Madiaon Nine Springs, VI
11.6
18.0
50.0
energy
cost A energy
reg. discr.
Submerged Mixing of Equalization Tanka
Mankato, MN 10.0 coat
In-Situ Gas Cleaning of Fine Bubble Diffuaers
Michigan City, IN
Alliance, OH
Lakewood, OH
Nenna-Manasha, VI
Draft Tube
Atmore, AL
Eufaula, AL
Foley, AL
Opelika, AL
Fairfield, IA
(l)Presque Isle, ME
Star, NC
(l)Bonner Springs, KS
Hallstead Great Bend, PA
Submerged Turbine Draft Tube
Cranston, RI
U-Tube
(1)Lewes, DE
Submerged Propellor Mirer
Ishpeming, MI
(l)Stonn Lake, IA
7.5
18.0
energy
cost
cost
cost
2.0
2.55
1.0
0.94
2.8
5.2
0.6
1.4
0.35
energy
energy
energy
energy
energy
cost 4 energy
energy
cost
-
23.0 energy
0.75 cost
2.64 energy
3.4 cost 4 energy
C. E. Maguire, Inc.
Fay, Spofford 4 Thorndike, Inc.
O'Brien 4 Gere
Bolton 4 Menck
FA Thomas 4 Assoc.
Watermation, Inc.
McMahon Asaoc., Inc.
French, Raneker 4 Assoc.
Wright-Pierce
A.C. Kirkwood 4 Co.
Bellante, Claua, Miller, 4
Partners
Univeraal Engineering Corp.
Kidde Consultants
Foth 4 Van Dyke 4 Assoc.
Kuehl 4 Payer
CLARIFIERS
Aerated Clarifier
(l,2)Choctaw, OK
Fixed-Media Clarifier
(l)Waynesburg, OH.
Aspirating Propellor Pump
Welch, WV
0.5 reg. discr. Rea Engineering 4 Assoc., Inc.
0.4 energy
cost
(l)lndlcates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)lndicates that this facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Flocculating Clarifier
Central Valley, UT
(2)Denmark, WI
(l)Madison Nine Springs, WI
Inclined Plate Settler
(2) Sanford, ME
Tube Settlers v/Chlorination
(l)Flagstaff, AZ
50.0
0.5
50.0
3.6
energy
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
Reg. discr.
6.0 cost
Coon, King & Knowlton/
Brown & CaIdwe 11
O'Brien 4 Gere
Environmental Engineers, Inc.
Brown & Caldwell
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
Collection of Septic Tank Effluent
Wasilla, AK
(l)Marathon, IA
Kenneth, MN
(l)Lincoln, MT
Muskingum, OH
CSO Treatment
Decatur, IL
Ogdensburg, NY
Houston, TX
Small Diameter Gravity Collection
(1 ,2)Lake Monroe, IN
Alligator, MS
(l)Lincoln, MT
(l)Crawford, NY
(l)Woodstock, NY
(1 )Cornersville, TN
Montgomery Co., VA
Variable Grade Sewer
Cooksville, OH
Roseville, OH
Twin Cities, OHG
Zaneaville, OH
DISINFECTION
Ozonation
0.04
0.01
0.11
0.04
41.0
6.5
320
0.039
0.03
0.11
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.671
0.671
8.0
cost
cost
reg. discr.
env. ben.
cost
cost 4 env.
ben.
coat
cost
cost
cost
cost 4 envr.
ben.
cost
cost
cost
cost 4 energy
cost
cost
cost
cost
CH M Hill, Inc.
DGR & Assoc.
McCombs-Knutson, Assoc.
Stahly Eng. 4 Assoc.
Fried1 * Harris
Sterns and Wheeler
Lockwood, Andrews 4 Newnam
Beam, Longest, 4 Neff
Ray Barker 4 Associates
Staley Eng. & Assoc.
Phillip J. Clark,
Engineers, Inc.
Lombardo Assoc. of Boston
John Coleman Hayes
Draper-Aden
Finkbeiner, Pettis, & Stron
Design Enterprises, Inc.
W. E. Quicksall & Asaoc.
DaIton-DaIton-Li 11le
Moorhead, MN
6.0
reg. discr.
Water-nation, Inc.
Tl)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (oont'd)
Deacrlption of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(HSD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Pre-Ozonation
N. E. Ohio, OH
50.0
Engineering Science
DISPOSAL OF EFFLUENT
Deep Well Injection of Effluent
(l)St. Petersburg, FL 60.5
Subsurface Filter/Surface Discharge
Lee County, FL 10.0
Town of Newport, VT 0.4
Water Supply/Aquifer Recharge
Lee Co. FL 10.0
(1)E1 Paao, TX 10.0
cost
cost A energy
env. ben.
env. ben.
env. ben.
Phillips * Ember ley, Inc.
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper, Inc
ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY
Active/Passive Solar Heating
(l)Hillsborough, NH
Providence, RI
0.45
60.0
Solar Heat/Hearth Shelter Insulation
Lake Crystal, NH
Active Solar Heating
(1,2)Vinton, IA
City of Newport, VT
0.31
1.8
1.2
Energy Recovery/Heat Pumps
(l)Storm Lake, IA 3-4
New York City, NY 110.0
(l)Hillsborough, NH 0.45
(l)Los Angeles City, CA 470.
0)Los Angeles County, CA 400
Hydroelectric Generation Station
Bonney Lake, WA 2.0
Solar Collectors/Energy Conservation
Pine River, UN 0.25
Solar Power System
(l)Waynesburg, OH 0.4
energy
energy
energy
energy
energy
cost A energy
energy
energy
energy
energy
energy
reg. descr.
energy
Anderson-Nichols Assoc. , Inc.
Universal Engineering Corp.
Bo Iten 4 Menk
H. R. Green 4 Co.
Webster-Martin, Inc.
Kuehl A Payer
SEA Consultants, Inc.
Anderson-Nichols Assoc., Inc.
Montgomery & Parsons
Foster-Wheeler/Babcock A
Wilcox/LA County staff
Phillip M. Botch A Assoc.
D. L. Floan
(1)Indicates that thia facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)lndicatea that thia facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Solar Space Heating
Cornelia, GA
(2)Lake Monroe, IN
Gaffney, SC
(2)Jackson, WY
Supplemental Solar Heating
(l)Flagstaff, AZ
Use Waste Steam From Foyer Plant
(2)Waukesha, VI
(l)Los Angeles City,CA
(l)Los Angeles County, CA
Waste Heat Recovery
Macon-Bibb, GA
(1)Greensboro, NC
(l,2)North Tulsa, OK
(l)Tri-City, OH
3.0
0.039
3.2
3.5
6.0
11.6
470
400
28.0
20.0
30.0
13.5
reg. closer.
coat
reg. descr.
energy
energy
energy
energy
energy
joint munic.
/Indust.
energy
reg. discr.
cost & energy
Beam, Longest 4 Neff
ARIX
Brown 4 Caldwell
Alvord, Burdic A Howson
Montgomery & Parsons
Foster-Wheeler/Babcock &
Wilcox/County Staff
Black 4 Veatch/Fell, Brusso,
Brut on 4 Knowles
CH2M Mill Engineers
FILTRATION
Continuous Clean Sand Filter
Eveleth, MN
Johnstown, OH
Floating Dredge Sand Filter
(2)Green River, WY
Intermittent Sand Filtration
(l)Marathon, IA
Microscreens
(2)Sterling, CO
Bur ley, ID
Newton, MS
Scottsbluff, NE
Henderson, NY
Recirculating Rock Filter
(2)Marionville, MO
(2)Seymour, MO
1.7 cost & energy Robert R. Wallace 4 Aasoc.
0.75 cost Evan,Mwechwart, Ambleton &
Tilton, Inc.
1.5 reg. Diacr. Culp, Wesner, Gulp
0.04 cost DOR 4 Aasoc.
3.88 reg. descr. ARIX
2.25 cost & energy CH.M Hill
0.77 cost Wayne Watts, Engineer
3.14 - John E. Olsson A Associations
1.5 cost URS Engineers
0.49 cost Hood-Rich
0.25 cost Hood-Rich
(l)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)lndicates that this facility is operational.
8
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Recirculating Sand Filter
(2)Port Costa, CA 0.033 energy
(2)Miranda, CA 0.046 energy
Damiansville, IL 6.0 reg. discr.
Sandieville, KY 0.03 cost
(2)Alton, MO 0.1085 cost ft energy
Eminence, MO 0.29 cost & energy
(2)Mountain View, MO 0.27 cost 4 energy
Lane, OR 0.044 energy
Little Black S.D.#1, WI - cost
Slow Rock Filter
New Haven, IL 0.07 coat
(l)Vest Monroe, LA 5.6
Primary Effluent Filtration
DeKalb, IL -
Wheaton, IL 8.9 cost
Corry, FA 9.0 cost 4 energy
Warainster, PA -
Harris 4 Assoc.
Vinzler ft Kelley
Barttelbort ft Rhutas
Crane ft Fleming Company
Missouri Engineering
Crane ft Fleming Company
Kramer, Chin 4 Mayo
C. C. Crane, Inc.
Hunter H. Martin & Assoc.
Baxter 4 Woodman
Lake Engineering
Carrol Engineering
LAGOONS
Total Containment Pond
Gerlach, NV
(2)Marietta, GA
0.03
0.3
Controlled Discharge Stabilization Pond
Jackman, ME
Deep Lagoons
Dodge City, KS
Complete Mil Lagoon
(2)Douglas, WY
Facultative Lagoons
Bristol Bay, AK
Holbrook, AZ
4.25
1.5
0.15
1.3
cost
Vingler & Kelly
0.103 cost & energy Carroll 4 Taylor Assoc.
reg. discr.
cost
cost & energy
energy
Lagoon in Lieu of Chlorination
Canton, ME 0.04 reg. descr.
Lagoon in Lieu of Clarification/Sludge Treatment
Wilmington, VT 1.1 cost ft energy
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
Black ft Veatch
Tryck, Nyman ft Hayes
John Carollo Engineers
Woodward ft Curran, Inc.
Eberhard Engineering
(l)Indicatea that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
LAND APPLICATION OF EFFLUENT
Aquaculture
Paragould, AR 2.2 -
Wilton, AR 0.09 env. ten.
(l)Austin, TX 26.0 energy
San Benito, TX -
Craig-New Castle, PSD, VA 0.18
Duckweed
Paragould, AR 2.2 Reg. descr.
Rapid Infiltration
(2)Wayoross, GA 7.0 cost
Payette Lakes, ID 1.8 cost
(1,2)Lincoln, MT 0.11 env. ben.
(2)Madisun, SD 1.8 cost
Silviculture
(l,2)Dalton, GA 4-0.0 reliability
Eagle Lake, NC 0.023 env. ben. A
reliability
(2)Eagle Lake, ME 0.146 env. ben. 4
reliability
Steep Slope Spray Irrigation
(2)Cralgsville, VA 0.25 env. ben.
Wetlands
Granger, IA 0.311 env. ben.
Norwalk, IA 0.633 env. ben.
Riverside, IA - env. ben.
St. Paul, KS - env. ben.
Collins, MS 0.4 env. ben.
Incline Village, NV 2.14 cost
Cannon Beach, OR 49.0 cost
McClelland Consulting
Engrs. Inc.
Parkhill, Smith 4 Cooper, Inc.
Anderson ft Assoc.
Black 4 Veatch
JUB Engineers, Inc.
Stahly Engineers 4 Assoc.
Banner Assoc., Inc.
Carroll 4 Taylor 4 Assoc.
Carroll 4 Taylor 4 Assoc
Betz. Converse 4 Murdock
Veenstra 4 Kimm, Inc.
Associate Engineers, Inc.
Shive-Hattery & Assoc.
Shetler, Griffith & Shetlar
Engineering Associates
CH2M Hill
Engineers/CuIp-Wesner-CuIp
CH2M Hill Engineers
NITRIFICATION
Fixed Growth Biological Nitrification
Redwood Falls, MN 0.7
Pure Oxygen/Single Stage Nitrification
Indianapolis, IN 125.0
Upf low Packed Bed Nitrification
(2)Upper Eagle Valley, CO
3.2
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
cost
Reid, Quebe, Allison Wilcox
4 Assoc.
M4I Engineers
(1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
10
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Techno logy/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
RBC Nitrification
Milford, ME
(1,2)0ak View, CA
Specialized Bacteria
Home 11, NY
3-0
3-25
reg. discr.
cost 4 energy
cost
Haley 4 Ward, Inc.
James Montgomery Engineers
LaBells Associates
NUTRIENT REMOVAL
Allied Treatment for Phosphorus Removal
Big Fork, MT 0.5
Bardenpho
Ft. Meyers, FL
(l)Payson, AZ
24.0
2.4
Breakpoint Chlorination for Ammonia Removal
Longmont, CO 11-55
Chemical Addition to Lagoon for P Removal
Albany, MN
Albertville, MN
PhoStrip
(l)Brockton, MA
(1)Rocheater, MN
Reno, NV
Amherst, NY
Ithica, NY
Biofilter/Diffused Air TKN Removal
Oakland, MD
Waste Pickle Liquor/P Removal
(l)Baltimore, MD
Anoxic/Oxic System
Fayetteville, AR
Largo, FL
(l)Baltimore, MD
(l)Tri-City, OR
Lancaster, PA
0.4
0.12
18.0
19-1
40.0
12.0
10.0
0.9
170.0
17.0
13.0
70.0
13-5
30.0
cost 4 env. ben. Thomas, Dean 4 Hoskins, Inc.
energy
cost Moore Knickerbocker & Asaoc.
cost McCall, Ellington, 4
Morrill, Inc.
cost Rieke-Carroll-Muller 4 Assoc.
cost Meyer Rohlln, Inc.
cost 4 energy Fay, Spoffort 4 Thorndike, Inc.
energy Kirkham-Michael 4 Assoc.
cost Kennedy, Jenks Engineers
cost Neussbaumer, Clark 4 Velzy
cost Sterns and Wheeler
cost Franklin Assoc.
coat Whitman, Reguardt 4 Assoc.
CH2M Hill Engineers
cost
cost Whitman, Reguardt 4 Assoc.
cost 4 energy CH-M Hill Engineers
cost Huth Engineers
OXIDATION DITCH
Anoxic Oxidation Ditch
Chatham, VA
0.45
cost 4 energy Olver, Inc.
(~1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
11
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (oont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Over-Under Aeration
Cleveland, VA
Fries, VA
Benthal Stabilization
Wellsboro, PA
Carrousel Oxidation Ditch
(2)Mount Holly Springs, PA
0.04
0.22
2.0
energy
energy
cost
Dewberry, Nealon, 4 Davis
Dewberry, Nealon, 4 Davis
Tatman 4 Lee
0.3 cost 4 energy Tracy Engineers
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTORS
Hydraulically Assisted RBC's
(l)Hardinsburg, KY 0.73
Air Driven RBC's
0,2)0ak View, CA 3-0
energy
cost 4 energy James Montgomery Engineers
SLUDGE TECHNOLOGY
Thickeners, Belt Filter Presses
(OCape May Co., NJ
Lateral Flow Thickeners
(l)Bonner Springs, KS
(l)Hutchison, KS
Carver-GreenfieId
(l)Loa Angeles City, CA
(l)Los Angeles County, CA
Mercer Co., NJ
6.3
1.4
8.3
470.0
400
56.0
reg. discr.
Energy
cost
energy
energy
cost, energy
4 env. ben.
Pandullo, Quirk 4 Assoc.
A. C. Kirkwood 4 Co.
Wilson 4 Co.
Montgomery 4 Parsons
Foster-Whaeler/Babcock 4
Wilcox/LA County Staff
Clinton-Bogart Assoc.
Belt Filter Presses with Lime Feed
Ewing-Lawrence, NJ 18.0
Vacuum Sludge Drying Beds
(2)Nevada City, CA
Brighton, CO 1.76
Belle Plains, IA 0.61
Oilman, IL 0.5
(2)Portage, IN 3-5
(2)Union City, IN 1.5
Gantier, MS 2.6
(l)Chinook, MT 0.5
Buena Vista, VA
cost 4 energy Buck Siefort 4 Jost
energy
cost
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
cost
cost 4
env. ben.
cost
Henningson, Durham, Richardson
H. R. Green Co.
Jerry Lacy 4 Assoc.
American Engineering
M. W., Inc.
Earth and Associates
Robert Peccia 4 Assoc.
White 4 Co.
1,1 ^Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
12
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Vacuum/Belt Series
Oklahoma City, OK 40.0
Odor Control for Sludge Lagoons
(2)Sacramento, CA
Facultative Sludge Lagoons
(l)Flagstaff, AZ 6.0
Travelling Guns to Land Apply Sludge
Grand Strand, SC 6.0
energy
Benham-Blair ft Affiliates, Inc.
cost 4 energy Sacramento Area Consultants
cost 4 energy Brown & Caldwell
cost
INCINERATION
Chromium Detoxification of Fludized Bed Ash
S. Essex, MA
Co-Incineration
Macon Co., GA
Glen Cove, NY
Memphis, TN
Starved Air Combustion of Sludge
(2)St. Louis, MO
(l)Greensboro, NC
41.0
14.0
8.0
80.0
167-0
20.0
reg. discr.
cost
reg. discr.
cost 4 energy
energy
energy
Thermal Processing w/Production of Construction Aggregate
Philadelphia, PA 100.0 reg. descr.
Tighe and Bond
Wm. F. Cosulich 4 Assoc/
E.F.W. Frank
Consoer, Townsend 4 Assoc.
Franklin Research Institute
SLUDGE COMPOSTING
Aerated Static Pile Composting
(l)Lexington-Fayette, KY 16.0
Myrtle Beach, SC 12.5
Modified Windrow Composting
Tampa, FL 60.0
Invessel Mechanical Composting
Brunswick, GA 10.0
(l)Cape May, NJ 6.3
Clinton Co., NY
New York, NY 280.0
(1 )East Richland, SC 7.0
env. ben A
reliability
env. ben ft
reliability
cost
reg. discr.
cost
cost
env. ben. 4
reliability
Pandullo, Quirk ft Assoc.
Metcalf 4 Eddy
NY City/Compost Systems, Inc.
11)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
13
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Techno logy/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(HGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Sludge Composting
Jefferson Co., AL
Juneau, AK
(2)Beatrice, NE
(1)E1 Paso, TX
Sludge Digestion
Aerobic Digestion
(l)Weiser, ID
(l)Chinook, MT
Anaerobic Digestion
(1)Aroostook/Presque Isle, ME
Dual Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion
35.0
1.9
10.0
2-3
0.5
1.3
env. ben. 4
reliability
cost
env. ben.
Arctic Environmental Engineers
Hoskings, Wester 4 Sonderegger
Parkhill, Smith 4 Cooper, Inc.
env. ben. CH M Hill
cost & env. ben. Robert Peccia & Assoc.
energy
(1 )Hagerstown, MD
(l ,2)Henderson, NC
(2)Lackawanna, NY
8.0
4.14
4.5
cost 4 energy
env. ben. 4
reliability
reliability
Wright-Pierce, Inc.
Buckhart-Horn
Neussbaumer, Clark 4 Velzy
MISCELLANEOUS
Aerobic Pure Oxygen Fluid!zed Bed Reactor
(2)East Bay Dischargers, CA 13*1
Nassau Co., NY 10.0
Biological Aerated Filter
Oneonta, Al 2.2
Wallace, NC 0.64
Harrah, OK
St. George, SC 0.8
Captor
Moundsville, WV 2.75
Chemical Air Scrubber Odor Control
Western Lake Superior, MN 43*9
Community Mound System
Elbe, WA 0.4
Computerized Financial Management
Passaic Valley, NJ
Digester Supernatant Treatment
Mokena, IL 1.10
cost 4 energy
reg. discr.
cost
cost
cost
cost
Kennedy/Jenka Engineers
Consoer, Totmsend & Assoc.
cost
cost
Cerrone 4 Vaughn, Inc.
reg. discr. Southwest Survey Eng.
Byrne-Stevens 4 Assoc..
Authur Young 4 Company
reg. discr. Mulford Engineering
(1)Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
14
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(MOD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Dissolved Air Flotation
(l)Weiser, ID 2.3
Earthen Pond System
Quincy, CA 0.72
Eduotor Induced Vacuum Chemical Addition
env. ben.
CH M Hill
cost & energy John Carollo Engineers
Washington, DC
Enclosed Impeller Screw Pumps
(l)Hutchiaon, KS
West bo rough, MA
Republic, MD
(l)Hillsbo rough, NH
309-0
8.3
7.68
0.93
0.45
cost
cost
reg. discr.
energy
cost 4 energy
Intermittent Cycle Extended Aeration System
Cornersvllle, TN
Tullahoma, TN
Union City, TN
Modular Activated Sludge
Edgar Springs, MO
Norwood, MO
—
3-0
4.03
0.04
0.04
cost
cost
cost
cost
cost
Permafrost Construction
Naknek, AK
Powdered Activated Carbon/Regeneration
Sauget, IL
Kalamazoo, MI
(2)Burlington, NC
Bedford Heights, OH
N. Olmsted, OH
(1)E1 Paso, TX
Primary Treatment Facility
E. Millinocket, ME
Sequencing Batch Reactor
Idaho Springs, CO
(2)LaClaire, IA
(2)Grundy Center, IA
Sabula, IA
Horn Point, MD
Poolesville, MD
(l,2)Choctaw, OK
Rush/Ryan, PA
Huron, SD
27.0
53-3
9-5
2.5
8.0
10.0
0.5
0.6
0-5
0.83
0.7
0.04
0.6
0.5
0.05
2.3
coat
reg. discr.
cost
cost
reg. discr.
cost
env. ben.
cost
cost
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
reg. discr.
cost
cost & energy
reg. discr.
cost 4 energy
cost
Wilson 4 Co.
SEA Consultants, Inc.
Hood-Rich
SEA Consultants, Inc.
John Coleman Hayes
Heagler & Marshall
Scott Consulting Eng.
Tryck, Nyman 4 Hayes
Russell Axon & Assoc.
Jones 4 Henry
Dalton, Dalton, Little
Dalton, Dalton, Little
Parkhill, Smith 4 Cooper
Camp, Dresser 4 McKee, Inc.
McCall, Ellingson 4
Morrill, Inc.
Shive Hattery 4 Assoc.
Clapaddle Garber 4 Assoc.
Shive Hattery 4 Assoc.
Kamber Engineers
Rea Engineering & Assoc., Inc.
Nassaux-Hensley
Wells Engineering
(Dlndicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)Indicates that this facility is operational.
15
-------
TABLE 1 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED LESS THAN 10 TIMES (cont'd)
Description of Technology/Grantee
Design
Flow Basis of
(HGD) Approval
Design Consulting Firm
Shallow Bed Trickling Filter Media
Delmont, PA
Soil Purification Treatment
Kapehu, HI
Swirl Concentrators
(2)Auburn, IN
(l)Presque Isle, ME
(2)Toledo, OH
Teacup Separator for Grit Removal
(l)Leves, DE
Omaha, NE
Trickling Filter-Solids Contact
(2)Coeur D'Alene, ID
Geneseo, IL
Albuquerque, NM
Claremore, OK
Chemung Co., NY
Tubular Screv Pumps
Ft. Meade, FL
(1)Aroostock-Presque Isle, ME
Gardiner, ME
Wind Turbine Generators
Erie, NY
Windmill Compressed Air Aeration
Menan, ID
cost
Duncan & Assoc.
0.016
1.7
5.2
160.0
0.75
46.0
4.2
1.48
12.0
1.0
1-3
1.8
16.0
0.218
cost and energy Do Joker
cost
cost 4 energy
coat
cost
reg. discr.
cost
cost
cost
env. ben.
energy
reg. discr.
cost
Howard, Needles,
Tammen A Bergendoft
Wright-Pierce
Jones & Henry
Kidde Consultants
Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.
Brown 4 Caldwell
Belling Engineering
Wilson and Company
Lozier Engineers
Wright-Pierce, Inc.
SEA Consultants, Inc.
U.R.S. Company, Inc.
Thompson Engineers, Inc.
(7) Indicates that this facility is listed under more than one innovative technology.
(2)lndicates that this facility is operational.
16
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS FUNDED 10 or MORE TIMES
EPA
Region State
I Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
II Hew Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
III Delaware
Wash., D.C.
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
IV Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
V Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
VI Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
VII Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
VIII Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
IX Amer. Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
N. Marianas Is.
Pac. Islands
X Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Total
Wastewater
rt
h
9 1
1 Counter C
i.r»tlo
1
S
1
1
1
S
1
6
1
22
r4
a
latra Cat
Clarlfl
1
1
1
7
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
24
S
•4
4*
.
t<
a
B
1
3
4
3
1
S
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
4
1
33
M
Si
Dlg*ator
VtlUu
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
IS
7-
6 r
JfC
2 !
• b
U ^
ij
10
10
§
S
1
8
1
1
1
1
8
|
A
to
!
1
i
i
2
1
3
8
1
2
1
1
1
I
i
•
1
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
12
fl
f
S
m
1 Draft Tub
Oi Union
4
1
1
3
1
4
1
IS
a
•*
o
I Oxidation
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
11
17
-------
n
V
*j
ft
0
£
•H
c
o
*-»
tl
&
o
"0
0
*J
u
0)
t-4
V
w
to
H
U
U
CL>
g
o M
§5
U H
U
" 5s
u H «
J < O
3 §z
H 2 U
Z f
M
2 a
M 2
*^ (14
b)
CU
O
Q
U
S
U
J
u
10
*>
4)
4J
•i-l
U
Du
^
fl
C
0
H
«
U
S
•o
V
«
V
w
.
u
V
V
E I .
.H M U
6. 0
B a
C IJ» •<
..4 O<
*j o a
6-1 O
JS i 5
« C 0 M
« 0 1 1 1 Q «
o u i i t 0 a
c
C 0
-4 5 a ij r- in in
«OU«MVH
Oh— 1 OOMOO
a
V
r-l
11
•0
«J 0
-i ^ o
O --4 Vl
U > B
*J » O £
>J e 4J C £ 0* B
4JOC«£5S»
~4 U 3 T> 4J • "O O
3£^
1 « Tl
8 g S
14 14
V V %
41 >.j,j«(o>ca >
«Ei<«i.3xxo
4J
to
1
e u
•3 s
-1 C
3 • -H
1 • O D>
C C 0
D> 3 O U C O H
M C U *H
08 . S S
e
-i s o n »4 co
oEl-— o o o
c
o
4J O
« u
14
< E
14
»J O B C
>J C B 0 O
vi Vi -H |J ifl n
3 3 -H « * V
E U O U iJ X
5Vi -4 .H H
W *-- « ^-*
t> 3
4J o a > « CD
« 0 H b 2 S
to
Bl 0 0 0 >H
£ S S S £ o
5 B. 3 a 5 - b s
4J • C 14 «
o> » o o M • • • q c . »
CcBe3l4VlVt-*4OO •
•HOM-HMr^r^f^lJlMO U>-4
-1 O CT> C BX« 01)
D -1 U OOOHU < O
««0«OVtl4l4« dl£
o< « 5 ««r££Qc5 " k
3ld01-HMH|4H OV 4J0
OUB-4IQ X • Vi «£
VtlOH'H MMMUBA BX
14 »4 .««««£ -4 B14
SO >0
-H in cn M m «*
O O*4OOOnOr4 OO
" . 1
14 X 9 1 C C C C U
9 «T>p3 « i « O -4 6
6 M14$U r4OU-HVll4
« «oC « « ~i 4J « o
S SiJSnSSS'ug'Sl
^4 « • Bi 0 S
SB > B U » e
S 3 V . U -1
•o a « B B « 4>
>•-•« 5 o» J vi
o o o o B! tr> • . * "• -3
UVUV BU .U«» B
£ £• • Vi • . C Dill
BUBO* -< 4J -Z »4 14 C -4
>-l 01 MM^rHO
^
Ol It
B M
•H 4 «O *>4
e 14 o> « 3 « -.
8O, Vl J « C 4J -4 _!
at 3 •HO QBM4J
14 ff 4t IM jJl4BO>Ha
V Vl £Vl £ « » « B >
£10 VV *J C(D'H14II«
u ^ B-l o > i o f « a
i u M a z « j s e o
14
*
II
2 § ia a s 5 i i 2 s
0
• o
o •
* * •
•c a u cti
V C
a >, -H »p -H
« « C 14
« c a -H «
Vi « £ Oi V
Q a o B B
*-< U £ Oi
o x e x u
« 14 I 0
o « x 14 a
3 X U 14 f
14 d -H O <0
a (A K a u
M « \e in o
O O O N -4
£
u
4J
Q
>, C T9
V O Vl
-I ~4 «
B *•* 4J £
O 14 « « O
4J • > T3 14
14 B H -HO
« 0 >. 14 X
-H >O 3 « O i
2O O V V 14
U Ul S A U
£
«4
U U U H 2 >
% a a a Q S
e
o
TJ
« B
£ O
u *>
2 1
a
§~H VI
« •• o
£ (u OB*
° !H •
a u ui ^ «
u • U X
. a a c:
C « ~( « • £
° > J £ * »
mac o *J c
5 X5 ; S S
B 0 ~<
ft O m
3 . o> o m
^ ° .400
p
B
g
t»
1)
«e ex «
•DO O «
0 « £ > « -H
0 .5 ti C O * w
0 --*
-rl fl
a
>
m
•rt
4-1
>
o
c
•rl
u
0
c
!2
4J
0)
u
o
0)
•o
c
g
v. -0
" <"
v -M
™ -H
£• .2
B
• •«_
S "V
r-|
•[j
O TO
n
X '_c
6 *»
9
s ii
id
E -C
O xj .
4J ** '
a >i
E (AC/)
£ «O
£ 4J r-l
a ? 0
0 0 C
w *H X
C
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS
EPA
Region State
I Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
II New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
III Delaware
Wash., D.C.
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
IV Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
V Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
VI Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
VII Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
VIII Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
IX Amer. Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
N. Marianas Is.
Pac. Islands
X Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Total
Wastewater
!i
r
i
i
i
i
i
"
i
i
7
L
\&
22
1
24
22
3
16
8
3
3
2
1
4
3
1
13
M
1
S
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
5
3
18
3
I
h
1
4
2
1
2
1
1
14
1
1
1
5
1
1
2
4
1
42
. J
8 A
3 S
** h
S|
a
2
3
3
1
1
1
4
2
1
6
11
1
1
1
1
6
5
2
2
12
2
4
1
1
74
8
*}
^
x
1
1
3
3
1
1
12
10
2
3
22
9
6
3
1
8
10
1
6
4
5
6
24
8
2
12
8
4
2
6
6
2
1
2
6
14
1
5
6
5
4
37
i
•J
" J
•*
Js
2
9
1
5
4
38
2
11
27
5
16
2
1
10
3
3
12
6
7
4
4
4
S
12
6
4
2
16
1
1
22
2
9
1
4
3
3
67
1
t« TrMl
|
2
9
1
2
5
1
2
3
5
3
2
3
3
10
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
4
1
2
70
*•
I
Z
&
J
6
13
8
16
4
3
1
1
3
1
2
1
3
1
1
64
Sludge
II
S*
3
2
1
17
1
3
3
2
1
2
1
2
5
6
5
1
4
1
4
2
2
1
4
1
6
2
1
1
2
2
1
3
6
3
2
2
05
38
35
is"
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
10
_ J
•H ^
"•a
? a
2
II
5
9
7
6
4
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
48
8
S~.
II
M V
| 3
6
3
i
1
2
3
4
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
35
a
*•
;
z
S
CJ
1
10
i
2
1
3
1
1
4
9
5
5
2
4
14
4
11
12
5
6
1
3
13
17
18
4
2
6
10
1
2
1
2
2
4
87
19
-------
in
M
j
U
0> >
C b
•H VI 0 •
S . 5 «• S
£ g . 5 I
•H 9 *-4 •*•<
g f 5 ! ?
- H g- S S
C-l H H C! •
D>9 « « 00
•4 • 0> H» -H •
IS ' S S "
SO > S M H)
§•»— 1 « « r.
•H oSI -H ai in n
• ~* CM O O o w
e
X %
•H »
e • H o
i : s 1 t
5 S H W *
V
| § S g S
1
o
o
id •**
| 3
•* •
S 1 *
"* S" S
11 il
!-s|
• -< 3 o eo
0***| « e
E M
Z C
*1 5 £ !(
** ™ j
o P 5 3 S
S 3
*> H 0 W W
3 5 3 < -
n 5
Chilton Engineers
in
O
s.
b
2
*
3
&
|
b
•
•
«H
•H
P^
O
O
3
H
I
I,
a
»
•4
2
(5
Fox &• Drechsler
«
o
H
•
b
M
£
8
3
b
in
o
o
I
•
0
M
5
C. H. Guernsey &
in
_
«
H
2
|
8
d
e
I
1
41
r
i
i
i
3
2
i
a a
b "
S u
O II
j " j i § i
b 9 u u • b
• « • < u «
S •• S «2 5 S
v< k w4 0 * *H
fw o» e t* en
JS S 85 - £
u e o> H
« I « 55 S 3
5133 fl .
U G O < MX
m tn IA
S 0 0 0 0
b o
>' i
SU H b •
• 3 0 Z ?
•H e 2, • «
»j ~( K U « b
« > • -H X (9
& & S £ 33
80 o o a £
^ J- » «
a M* e « -rf
b • • b
b H • f H
» • J « •
-1 . U ft « • 0
ico •nee
6 o • • -j o *
41 • • b 0 • l|
$ 1 2 i !
•HO fl O O
j S 3 o £
n a co
So o o o
e e e e o
b
|| j s
-I « O * «J>
Mb b b «
on a u M
£ S S S S
t
M
HSH Consultants,
in
o
|
H
O
£
e
S
«
H
d
g
C
S
b
O
o
|
S
H
Wells Engineers
3
o
£
2
S
o
0
«
n
^4
•
M
*
N
O
o
1
j|
g
•
3
1
U
U
2
i
H
e
•H
a.
u
<
b
«?
o
O
§
o
H
lineeri
c
u
?
•H
3
I
3
<
u
>
CO
M
o
^t
»
b
3
•O
e
£
*
i
<
a
b
|
j
I
Z
o
o
|
w
g
io
o
^4
•
o>
a
a.
5
I
•
«
o
0>
c
u
•
Inters tat
f
o
o
G
*
8
g
Boyle 'Engineers
0
m
y
J
o>
>
•
3
<<
U
•H
M
i
•H
U
«
•H
rt
O
0
Q
g
u
Harin HMD Enginee
i-
c
•H
*i
u
i
fi
•
«
«j
3
«
C
8
2
|J
«
0
^
o
o
5
z
g
Schaffer I Roland
o
e
V
H
O
4J
0
z
8
o~
e
Houston E
o>
0
0
e
x
a
Assoc
*
J
b
V
U
Dewalt, Grant, Re
to
n
nkton
«
>.
a
VI
•r*
b
C
m
Becker En
r«
o
o
>,
b
E
Q
20
-------
-d
c
o
o
B
E
IT
C
*J
C r~>
0>3
•H «
*> c
0 O
GO
* *"* £2
mmunity
8
5
«
»
u
•H
>
» o
3 4J •
4-40
• .£ e
* tz
0 C
fu .-
C o
x u>
•
tt
4
•H
U
«
A
b
e
e
S
CO
M
•0
2
a
ta
i
s
g •? '«
s § s
< a «
0. <
«• a
SB b
£ <0 «
§ 21 B g
S 2 2 &
ft CO
o to in co
o o n *
J-o c «
b O H
« « 1
C S X «
« 5. 0 b
b « « «
0 S H J
M W >4 JM
S:
41
t>
U
«
*J •
C «
o u
• f>
* o
II b
s*
"1
g:s
<:•§
•H ^
« IM
U 0
0
II B
f-i 0
0 -H
b U
Cu «
C 0
I5
S^
-4 O
^4 IM
C
•4 b
O
to 41
41 a
v a
b -H
3 1
« u
•J H
)i
«
«
0
c
« fH
^t m
3 &
- &
V
c €
>» 0
? 9
•5 +>
0 c
o r
O* N
O O
i
™
ta
z
o
M
U • M
J 0 «
8 « *
U -4 41
M « «
fri Q M
U J rf
§ a o
•o
H
J
O
4
S
§ *
u> <
o m
O >H
8
c
a
f
•
II V
X X
3 3
£ II
4J «l
3 b
o .c
u P
3 8
u
C
M
*
0
0)
* S
0)
.c c
U -1
01 C
3 U
•o a
•H 1
> o
M ID
O O
O 0
4>
s
-4
o
0.
« s
Q Q
tH M
U
0
M
3
14
i
•H
3
•H
U
u
r»
O
10
mil ton
a
X
z
M
U
0
W
V)
U)
10
01
O
•o
4
c
3
m
O
a
o
c
CM
*
U
c
M X
.H
0)
0)
o>
C U)
ta
V 0)
O 0
c «v
•5 i
a z
b z
r^
CO O
0 O
a
M
c
C H
C
if "O
c t
0 -O
3 3
0 «
§ S
CQ
^ ^
e ^i .-» »
fr* *O fl 0
-4 M C
9 * « W
c u o o»
«j a a M
c -^
jp 3 e e a
SO bull
u CQ ea t? i
c J
«-<0 0 -1 -1 P4
)a *-H in -i o o
1
X
V
H b
4> J «
•HO tU -1
e -4 e i -4
3 ft. • « « «
Q C « « « 3
o « a z M u
b
* > < < a (0
« o o o n z
n
*J « 3 0 3 w
C < »* 33 33 0 O U
Q >H 4W» V
£ D» *H » J U ^ ft)
^. M C 0 C >, 00lC
• « U *H U O -( C -H -H .*
000t4«4>J U ifl « J O»
SC00KC 00£ C
OC0 0 -HOI^U]
^ r> -H c *« Q a c c
i i tn •<"* - o •-< c
>i>»CO»0^ »»«0O
0 0 U C CT« £ Wn}.H-(W
•H^< U-H^XCEUC^
00* 0uH«ou^:-H
o oStZ M4a: > £ o 0x
QcSmomaSutHz^u
>H
« M 1^ <-(
t4«0 ^ co «J ^* ncntA<-f
•HONOOOOmomoocN
IM
c
s &
0 M
4 4
b C O
° 8 5
« b « II
DUB* -H
b ~^ a a> a u
a • B "O o> « -H a
££0 b •HB«)C'4H
OVU njb^Sfi^O
no eo)e/>'Hui*
« | « o o4Jo
eEbfiBOVbNbMX
bid*H OA OO«> NOO 4^1
UZboSuUlSMUBlUJU
IM
a N N < «: < <
-------
T»
-P
C
O
u
ft
E -4
s §
6, «
g 3
•H
*J a
c^
w a e
-t n S
tt c 0
S5 £
B
tr»~
H O Q
a ^ o
« fc. S 1
3 ^, i
tj ^^ i
>
U
«
>
O
u
>4 H V iw
u z « IH
•H U A
c r « «J
3 P c n
§ ^ fl Oi
E Ufa
0 X « tt
u O O H
2 3 w •*
V) M
O
r
01 It
•H U
A B
a A
S « i
•& S i
O
b
n) a <
u X
1 1\
1 n u
o
o
o •
m o i
rH n 1
3
tt
O
N 0 °
1 ° S
0 1 B
£ £ 8
s s d
H
10
*J
CO
Uf
13
b
R)
M
10
S
C
0
*
1
0
o
N
A
X
1
z
tt
4J
e
«
Consult
Capital
N
M
V
4J
4J
3
e
s
Ol
B
••4
U
gineers
Enginee
e
Vaiey E
Chilton
in
* in
«* M
S
*>
•H
U
2 o
M U
3 £
g g
•
K
tl
•H
C?
U
i
^
•>i
Kennedy
o
o
*t
o
B
g
•
«
»J
«
Associ.
>>
Banner
in
H
X
^
S
^J
•H
•H
C
s
B B
H O
tt
i I
2 -
J U
•H
B TJ
•H U
6 S
Kramer ,
Alvord.
te
*
• H
n ^
I S
-1 0)
S X
% 3
£ £
r4
fc
* i
I *
e -H
« i4
n v
m
i •
i in
i
10
,-(
V
b
i *
** 5
•0 3
rf 0
o
*J
tt •-<
P?
gH
E >
•H
C -D
•H C
>H
«
*J «w
s°
•n e
o o
U M
a.2
cS
0 O
••4 -H
4J
S "
•H *>
fl
&kl
0
fl IM
•a u
B O
« *J
i-t A
c
tl -H
Oi-O
TJ U
3 0
* 0
M U
tl 4 •
A H 4J
U
II >H II
U A •*-!
II U 0
f 0 V.
P -i a
«
CQ
|
E
b
•H
&
.7
C
•*
tJ
e » —
••4 5 a
« -< (3
S £
*
X
(4
£
•*
«
^
^
s
•H
o
j
a
&
£
•rt
3C
u
.H
i
O
o
b
«
.0
^H
••H
(A
tJ
e
0
n
X
u
H
O
o
u
tt
,
tl V
e H
A ~<
|£
«
(a
e
M
O
B
1
1
1
e
A
•a
B
•H
Ol
£
I S
S o
o o
u
>H
z
V
II
«
4>
I
$
a
•H
U
M
%
U
0
tt
tt
<
a
x
u
«
2
•O
•H
>
10
a
>,
V
a)
to
a
u
«
*j
b
0
a.
V
V
E
«
Z
U
£
tt
X
b
s
a
i
0
•*4
~H
v4
•H
S
8\
C
b
V
tl
C
c»
c
u
tt
tt
B
o
§m
o
0
H
^
•H
>
0
?,
(4
g
n
lebor<
H
U
X
•
a
h
u
»
U
H
(J
a>
X
H
X
•
e
A
^4
•I
6
$
1
ItSOU
&
$
K4
£
u
REATM
fri
U
S
S
U)
Jr
b
II
>
<
Q
H
V
I
A
m
•H
£
U
•*4
X
M
X
«
N
h
U
>
a
t4
H
*J
M
£
M
X
«
X
3
g
•H
X
Q
M
22
-------
TABLE 6
FIELD TEST PROJECTS
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Clinton, AR
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Wauconda, IL
Winnfield, LA
Boston, MA
Rising Sun, MD
Jackman, ME
Charleston, MS
Whitefish, MT
Status
under construction
planned
Fayetteville, AR planned
in progress
planned
under construction
planned
in progress
completed
under construction
proposed
planned
Roswell, NM in progress
Chemung County, NY completed
Technology Involved
Digester Gas Scubbing
for Resale
Biological Aerated
Filter
Biological Nutrient
Removal
Aquaculture, Pulsed
Bed Filter, Fixed
Bed Anaerobic
Filter, Hybrid
Rock/Reed Filter
Advanced Water Treat-
ment for Potable
Re-use
Trickling Filter/
Solids Contact
Boat Clarifier
Composting
Photozone
Disinfection
Phosphorus Removal
Rock/Reed Filter
Phosphorus Removal
Via Phased
Isolation Ponds
Aerobic Composting
Trickling Filter/
Solids Contact
23
-------
Table 6 (cont'd)
Home 11, NY
Toledo, OH
Choctaw, OK
Clear Lake, WI
completed
completed
planned
completed
Seeded Bacterial
Nitrification
Swirl Concentrators
Sequencing Batch
Reactor
Primary Effluent
Filtration
24
-------
TABLE 7
100% M/R REQUESTS
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Fallen Leaf
Lake,CA
Manila, CA
Status
under review
awarded 9/83
awarded 8/83
South Portland, ME under review
Rising Sun, MD under review
Fall River, MA under review
Northfield, MN
Scottsbluff, NE
Santa Fe, NM
Lawrence, NY
Clifford, ND
Campbellsport, WI
under review
under review
under review
award pending
under review
under review
Technology
Tube Settlers/
Disinfection
Valves, Controls, and
Air Ejection System
in Vacuum/Pressure
Collection System
STEP System Sonic
Level Detectors
Composting
UV Disinfection
Self-Sustaining
Incineration
UV Disinfection
Microscreens
Draft Tube Aerators
Mound System
Mound System
Rapid Infiltration
25
-------
TABLE 8
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION I
US EPA - REGION I
Charles Conway
U.S. EPA Water Management Div,
JFK Federal Building,
Room 2203
Boston, MA 02203
(617) 223-3990
(FTS) 223-3990
Connecticut
William Hogan
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection
165 Capital Avenue
Hartford, CT 06115
(203) 566-2373
Maine
Dennis Purington
Department of Environmental
Protection
Hospital Street
Augusta, ME 04333
(207) 289-3901
Massachusetts
Robert Cady
Division of Water Pollution
Control
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Quality
Engineering
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108
(617) 292-5713
Rhode Island
Pierce Glazer
Rhode Island Division of
Water Supply and
Pollution Control
75 Davis Street
Providence, RI 02908
(401) 277-2243
Vermont
Edward Leonard
Environmental Engineering
Vermont Agency of
Environmental Conservation
State Office Building
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802) 828-3345
New Hampshire
Paul Currier
New Hampshire Water Supply and
Pollution Control
Commission
P. O. Box 95, Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 271-2755
26
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION II
US EPA - REGION II
Bruce Kiselica
U. S. EPA Water Management Div,
26 Federal Plaza, Room 813
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-5670
(FTS) 264-5670
New Jersey
Bob Simicsak
New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection
P. O. Box CN-029
Trenton, NJ 08625
(609) 292-2723
New York
John Marschilok
Technical Assistance Section
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233
(518) 457-3810
Puerto Rico
Jose Bentacourt, Chief
Local Assistance Grants Section
I/A Coordinator
Puerto Rico Environmental
Quality Board
P. O. Box 11488
Santurce, PR 00910
(809) 725-5140, ext 355
Virgin Islands
Francine Lang, Director
Natural Resources Management
Office
Virgin Islands Department of
Conservation and Cultural
Affairs
P. O. Box 4340
Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas,
Virgin Islands 00801
27
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION III
US EPA - REGION III
Lee Murphy
U.S. EPA Water Management Div
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215)597-8399
(FTS)597-8399
Delaware
Richard Aurich
Delaware Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental
Control
Division of Environmental Control
Tatnall Building
Dover, DE 19901
(302) 736-5081
District of Columbia
Lester Slocum
District of Columbia
Department of Environment
5000 Overlook Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20032
(202) 767-7603
Maryland
Hitesh Nigram
Office of Environmental
Protection
Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene
201 W. Preston Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
(301) 383-6346
Virginia
Walter Gills
Virginia State Water
Control Board
P. O. Box 11143
Richmond, VA 23230
(804) 257-6308
West Virginia
Elbert Morton
West Virginia Department of
Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
1201 Greenbrier Street*
Charleston, WV 25311
(304) 348-0633
Pennsylvania
Terry Killian
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources
Bureau of Water Quality
Management
P. 0. Box 2063
Harrisburg, PA 17120
(717) 787-3481
28
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION IV
US EPA - REGION IV
Bob Freeman
U.S. EPA Water Management Div.
345 Courtland St., N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30367
(404) 881-4180
(FTS) 257-4180
Alabama
David Hutchinson
Alabama Department of
Environmental Management
1751 Federal Drive
Montgomery, AL 36130
(205) 271-7700
Florida
Bhupendra Vora
Bureau of Wastewater
Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation
Management and Grants
Twin Towers Office Bldg.
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(904) 488-8163
Georgia
David Freedman
Georgia Department of
Natural Resources
Environmental Protection
Division
270 Washington Street, S. W.
Atlanta, GA 30334
(404) 656-4769
Kentucky
Vince Borres
Construction Grants
Section
Kentucky Department for
Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection
18 Reilly Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
(502) 564-3410
Mississippi
Jon Huey
Municipal Facilities Branch
Mississippi Department of
Natural Resources
Bureau of Pollution Control
P. O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS 39209
(601) 961-5113
North Carolina
Allan Wahab
Division of Environmental
Management
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
(919) 733-6900
29
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA Region IV (cont'd)
South Carolina
Sam Grant
201 Planning Environmental
Quality Control
South Carolina Department of
Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, S.C. 29211
(803) 758-5067
Tennessee
Robert Threadgill
Tennessee Department of
Public Health
Terra Building, 3rd Floor
150 Ninth Avenue North
Nashville, TN 37203
(615) 741-0638
30
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION V
US EPA - REGION V
Charles Pycha
U.S. EPA Water Management Div,
230 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 886-0259
(FTS) 886-0259
Illinois
James Leinicke
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-2027
Indiana
Steve W. Kim
Division of Water Pollution
Control
Indiana State Board of Health
1330 West Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46206
(317) 633-0706
Michigan
Brian Myers
Michigan Department of
Natural Resources
P. O. Box 30028
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 373-6626
Minnesota
David Kortan
Facilities Section
Division of Water Quality
Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency
1935 West County Road, B-2
Roseville, MN 51133
(612) 296-7387
Ohio
Sanut K. Barua
Division of Construction
Grants
Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency
P. O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216
Wisconsin
John Melby
Municipal Wastewater Section
Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources
P. O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 267-7611
31
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION VI
US EPA - REGION VI
Ancil Jones
U.S. EPA Water Management Div,
First International Building
1201 Elm Street (6W-GT)
Dallas, TX 75270
(215) 767-9905
(FTS) 729-9905
Arkansas
Martin Roy
Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control
and Ecology
8001 National Drive
Little Rock, AR 72209
(501) 562-7444
Louisiana
Ashok Patel
Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality
1170 Airline Highway
Baton Rouge, LA 70807
(504) 922-0530
New Mexico
Edward Stokes
New Mexico Environmental
Improvement Agency
Water Quality Section
P. O. Box 968, Crown Building
Santa Fe, NM 87501
(505) 984-0020
Oklahoma
Dr. H. J. Thung
Oklahoma Department of Health
Environmental Health Services
3400 North Eastern Avenue
P. O. Box 53551
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
(405) 271-7346
Texas
Milton Rose
Texas Department of Water
Resources
P. O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711
(512) 463-8513
' 32
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION VII
US EPA - REGION VII
Mario Nuncio
U.S. EPA Water Management Div,
726 Minnesota
Kansas City, KS 64115
(913) 236-2813
(FTS) 757-2813
Iowa
Wayne Farrand
22942 Iowa Department of
Environmental Quality
Henry A. Wallace Building
900 E. Grand
Des Moines, IA 50319
(515) 281-8992
Kansas
LaVene Brenden
Kansas Department of Health
and Environment
Division of Environment
Bureau of Water Quality
Forbes Field
Topeka, KS 66620
(913) 862-9360,
Missouri
David Cavendar
Missouri Department of
Natural Resources
Program Support Environment
Section
P. O. Box 1368
Jefferson City, MO 65102
(314) 751-3241
Nebraska
Rick Bay
Nebraska Department of
Environmental Control
Engineering Division
P. 0. Box 94877
State House Station
301 Centennial Mall South
Lincoln, NB 68509
(402) 471-2186
33
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION VIII
US EPA - REGION VIII
Stan Smith
U.S. EPA Water Management Div,
1 Denver Place
999 18th Street, Suite 1300
Denver, CO 80202-2413
(303) 293-1547
(FTS) 564-1547
Colorado
Utah
Frank Rozich
Water Quality Control Division
Colorado Department of Health
4210 E. llth Avenue
Denver, CO 80220
(303) 320-8333
Montana
Joseph Steiner
Water Quality Bureau
Environmental Sciences Division
Cogswell Building
Helena, MT 59620
(406) 444-2406
North Dakota
Wayne Kern
Division of Water Supply and
North Dakota Department of Health
Missouri Office Building
1200 Missouri Avenue
Bismarck, ND 58505
(701) 224-3498
(701) 224-4598
Kiran L. Bhayani
Utah Bureau of Water
Pollution Control
P. 0. Box 45500
Salt Lake City, UT 84145-0555
(810) 533-6146
Wyoming
Mike Hackett
Water Quality Division
Department of Environmental
Quality
Hathaway Building
Cheyenne, WY 82002
(307) 777-7083
South Dakota
Larry Van Hout
South Dakota Department of
Water and Natural
Resources Management
Joe Foss Building
Pierre, SD 57501
(605) 773-3351
34
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION IX
US EPA - REGION IX
Nancy Edmisten
U.S. EPA Water Management Div.
215 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 974-8300
(FTS) 454-83 00
Arizona
Nevada
Ron Frey
Arizona Department of
Health Services
Room 304
2005 North Central
Phoenix, AZ 85004
(602) 257-2231
California
Don Owen
California State Water
Resources Control Board
P.O. Box 100
Sacramento, CA 95801
(916) 322-3004
James Williams
Nevada Department of
Environmental Protection
201 S. Fall Street
Carson City, NV 89710
(702) 885-5870
Hawaii
Hiram Young
WTW Construction Grants Program
Hawaii State Department of Health
P. 0. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801
(808) 548-4127
35
-------
Table 8 (cont*d)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA REGION X
US EPA - REGION X
Tom Johnson
U.S. EPA Water Management Div.
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 442-2887
(FTS) 399-2887
Alaska Washington
Richard Markham Chris Haynes
Alaska Department of Department of Ecology
Environmental Conservation Office of Water Programs
Division of Water Programs Olympia, WA 98504
Pouch O (206) 459-6101
Juneau, AK 99811
(907) 465-2611
Idaho
Robert Braun
Idaho Department of
Health and Welfare
Division of Environment
State House
Boise, ID 83720
(208) 334-4269
Oregon
B. J. Smith
Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality
P. O. Box 1760
Portland, OR 97207
(503) 229-5257
36
-------
Table 8 (cont'd)
EPA AND STATE I/A TECHNOLOGY
COORDINATORS AND CONTACTS
EPA NATIONAL
Washington EPA-OMPC
National I/A Coordinator
Richard Thomas
U.S. EPA (WH-595)
Washington, D. C. 20460
(202) 382-7368
(FTS) 382-7368
Washington EPA-OMPC
Small Flows Technology Contact
Jeffrey Byron
U.S. EPA (WH-595)
Washington, D. C. 20460
(202) 382-7266
(FTS) 382-7266
Cincinnati EPA-WERL
Research I/A Contact
Jim Kreissl
U.S. EPA WERL
Cincinnati, OH 45268
(513) 684-7641
(FTS) 684-7641
U S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1985 461-217/34922 37
------- |