TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            fflttte ntd Instruction! on tht r-wit btfort compltiuig)
 1. REPORT NOi
  EPA/600/8-88/017
              3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                   PB88-179437/AS
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
                                                            C. REPORT DATE
   Health Effects Assessment for Ammonia
                                                           «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHOR(S)
              *. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME ANO ADDRESS
  Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
  Office of Research and Development
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  Cincinnati.  OH  45268
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                 EPA/600/22
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 6. ABSTRACT
   This  report summarizes and  evaluates information relevant  to  a  preliminary interim
 assessment of adverse health  effects associated with specific chemicals or compounds.
 The  Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses  these documents in
 preparing cost-benefit analyses  under Executive Order J2991  for decision-making under
 CERCLA.   All  estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency presented in
 this document should be considered as preliminary and reflect limited resources
 allocated to  this project.  The  intent in these assessments  is  to suggest acceptable
 exposure levels whenever sufficient data are available.  The interim values presented
 reflect  the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure  or risk to the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values  have been
 estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants fcr which cancer is not  the endpoint of
 concern).   The first, RfD$ or subchronic reference dose, is  an  estimate of an exposure
 level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects when  exposure occurs during
 a limited time interval.  The RfD is an estimate of an exposure level  that would not
 be expected to cause adverse  effects when exposure occurs for a significant portion
 of the lifespan.  For compounds  for which there Is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity, qi*s have been  computed, if appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation data if available.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS ANO DOCUMEN1 ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  Public
1*. SECURITY CLASS (Thit Report)

  Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
 9. SECURITY CLASS (Thit page)
  Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA f»rm 2220-1 (*•». 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION •• OMOUKTC

-------
                                             EPA/600/8-88/017
                                             June. 1987
           HEALTH  EFFECTS  ASSESSMENT
                  FOR  AMMONIA
ENVIRONMENTAL  CRITERIA AND  ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE  OF  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
     U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
             CINCINNATI, OH  45268
              U.S.  Environjaental  Protection Agency

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER


    This   document   has   been  reviewed   In  accordance   with  the   U.S
Environmental  Protection  Agency's  peer  and  administrative review  policies
and approved for publication.  Mention of  trade names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation  for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE


     This  report summarizes and  evaluates  Information  relevant to a prelimi-
 nary Interim assessment  of adverse health  effects  associated with ammonia.
 All  estimates  of  acceptable  Intakes  and carcinogenic  potency  presented In
 this  document   should  be  considered  as  preliminary  reflecting  limited
 resources  allocated  to  this  project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and environ-
 mental  data  were located through on-line literature searches of the Chemical
 Abstracts,  TOXLINE,  CANCERLINE  and  the  CHEMFATE/DATALOG  data  bases.   The
 basic  literature  searched  supporting this  document  Is  current up  to  Hay,
 1986.   Secondary  sources  of  Information have  also  been relied  upon  1n the
 preparation  of  this  report   and  represent  large  scale  health  assessment
 efforts  that  entail extensive peer and  Agency  review.  The following Office
 of  Health  and  Environmental Assessment  (OHEA)  sources have been extensively
 utilized:

     U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Hazard  Profile   for  Ammonia.    Prepared  by the
     Office   of   Health   and   Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental
     Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for the  Office of
     Solid Waste, Washington, DC.

     U.S.  EPA.   1981.   Ambient  Water  Quality Criterion  for  the Protec-
     tion  of  Human  Health:  Ammonia.  Prepared  by  the Office  of Health
     and  Environmental  Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment
     Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the  Office of  Water  Regulations  and
     Standards,  Washington,  DC.

     U.S.  EPA.    1983.   Reportable  Quantity   Document  for  Ammonia.
     Prepared  by  the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,
     Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH  for
     the Office  of  Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC.

     The Intent  1n  these assessments Is  to suggest  acceptable exposure levels
 for  noncardnogens   and  risk   cancer   potency  estimates   for  carcinogens
whenever sufficient  data were  available.  Values were not  derived  or  larger
 uncertainty  factors were  employed  when  the variable data  were limited  In
 scope   tending   to  generate  conservative   (I.e.,   protective)  estimates.
Nevertheless, the  Interim  values presented reflect  the relative  degree  of
hazard or risk associated with exposure to the chemical(s) addressed.

    Whenever  possible,  two categories  of  values  have  been estimated  for
systemic  toxicants  (toxicants   for  which  cancer  1s  not   the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first,  RfD$ (formerly AIS)  or  subchronlc reference  dose,  Is
an estimate of  an  exposure  level  that  would  not be expected to cause adverse
effects when  exposure  occurs  during  a  limited  time Interval (I.e., for  an
Interval that does not constitute  a  significant portion of  the llfespan).
                                      111

-------
This  type  of exposure estimate has not been  extensively  used,  or rigorously
defined,  as previous  risk  assessment efforts  have been  primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants  1n  ambient  air  or  water  where  lifetime
exposure   Is   assumed.   Animal   data  used   for   RFD§  estimates  generally
Include  exposures  with durations of  30-90  days.   Subchronlc human  data  are
rarely available.   Reported exposures are usually  from chronic occupational
exposure  situations  or  from  reports  of acute  accidental exposure.   These
values   are  developed  for   both   Inhalation   (RfD$i)   and   oral   (RfD$o)
exposures.

    The  RfD  (formerly AIC)  Is  similar  In  concept   and  addresses  chronic
exposure.   It  Is an estimate  of an  exposure  level  that would not be expected
to cause  adverse effects when  exposure  occurs  for a  significant  portion  of
the Hfespan  [see U.S. EPA  (1980b)  for  a discussion  of  this  concept].   The
RfD  1s  route-specific and  estimates  acceptable  exposure  for either  oral
(RfOo)  or  Inhalation  (RfDj)  with  the   Implicit   assumption   that  exposure
by other routes Is  Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for  noncarclnogens  have  also  been  calculated
where  data  permitted.   These  values  are  used  for   Identifying  reportable
quantities  and the methodology  for  their development  1s  explained  In  U.S.
EPA (1984).

    For  compounds  for which there 1s sufficient evidence  of  carclnogenlclty
RfD$  and  RfD  values  are  not derived.  For  a discussion  of risk  assessment
methodology  for  carcinogens refer  to  U.S.  EPA  (1980b).   Since cancer  1s  a
process  that  1s  not  characterized by  a  threshold, any exposure contributes
an Increment  of  risk.  For carcinogens,  q-j*s have been computed.  If appro-
priate, based on oral and Inhalation data If available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT


    In  order  to  place  the risk  assessment evaluation  In proper  context,
refer  to the  preface of  this  document.  The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable  to  all   documents  of  this  series  as  well  as  the  appropriate
Interpretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    Ammonia,  a  by-product  of  metabolism  absorbed  by  the  gut,  normally
combines  with  carbon  dioxide  to  form  urea.   Only  when   this  process  Is
saturated are  toxic  effects  of  ammonia  observed.   Data  were  Inadequate  to
develop  an   RfD$o  or RfDg.   A  taste  threshold  of  34  mg/l Is  proposed,
consistent with U.S.  EPA (1981).

    When  Inhaled,  ammonia  acts  as  an   Irritant  on  the upper  respiratory
tract.   To   protect   against  this  effect,  an  RfO$i  or  RfOj  value  of  7.0
mg/day  for  a  70  leg  human  or 0.49  mg/kg/day  Is  recommended, based on  the
lower-bound  limit of the range  for  odor detection of 0.36  mg/rn3  (Carson  et
al.,  1981).   A CS  of 19,   based  on  hlstopathologlcal  lesions In  the  liver,
spleen  and   kidney   of  guinea   pigs   exposed   Intermittently  to  119   mg/m3
(Weatherby,  1952) was chosen to represent the toxldty of  ammonia.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by  Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under Contract No.  68-03-3112 for EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Or. Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn  were the  Technical  Project  Monitors   and  John  Helms  (Office  of
Toxic  Substances) was  the Project Officer.  The  final  documents   1n  this
series  were prepared  for  the  Office of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,
Washington, DC.

    Scientists  from  the following U.S. EPA  offices provided  review  comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of A1r Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series  was  provided  by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati. OH

Technical  support services  for  the  document  series  was  provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer, Jacky Bohanon and K1m Davidson
    Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.
2.


3.








4.








5.
6.




ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	 ,
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . ,
2.1. ORAL 	 ,
2.2. INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	
3.1.1. Oral 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
3.4. TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	
4.1.1. Oral 	
4.1.2. Inhalation 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	
4.4. WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT . 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfDs) 	
6.1.1. Oral (RfDso) 	
6.1.2. Inhalation (RfDcT) 	
Page
. . . . 1
. . . . 4
. . . . 4
. . . . 5
. . . . 7
. . . . 7
. . . . 7
. . . . 9
. . . 14
. . . 14
. . . . 14
. . . 14
. . . 15
... 16
... 16
... 16
... 16
... 17
... 17
... 17
... 18
... 18
... 19
... 21
... 21
... 21
... 21
       V11

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                         Page
     6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE  (RfD)	-.	    23
            6.2.1.   Oral (RfD0)	    23
            6.2.2.   Inhalation (RfDj)  	    25
     6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY  (q-|*)	    29
 7.  REFERENCES.	    30
APPENDIX	    40
                                     V111

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES
No.                               Title                                Page
1-1     Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and Half-Lives
        for Ammonia	    2
3-1     Effects of Subchronlc Inhalation Exposure on Hammals	   11
6-1     Composite Scores for the Oral Toxlclty of Ammonia	   26
6-2     Composite Scores for the Inhalation Toxldty of Ammonia ...   28
                                     1x

-------
                             LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BUN                      Blood  urea  nitrogen
bw                       Body weight
CS                       Composite score
LCso                     Concentration  lethal to 50% of  recipients
                         (and all other subscripted dose levels)
LOAEL                    Lowest-observed-adverse-effect  level
LOEL                     Lowest-observed-effect level
MED                      Minimum effective dose
PEL                      Permissible exposure level
ppm                      Parts  per million
RfD                      Reference dose
RfDj                     Inhalation  reference dose
RfDn,                     Oral reference dose
RfD$                     Subchronlc  reference dose
RfD$i                    Subchronlc  Inhalation reference dose
RfDso                    Subchronlc  oral reference dose
RQ                       Reportable  Quantity
RV
-------
                      1.   ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

     Selected  physical and  chemical  properties  of  ammonia are  presented  In
 Table  1-1.
     The  atmospheric  residence  time of ammonia  1s  relatively  brief.   Gener-
 ally,  combination  with  sulfate or  washout from  rainfall  accounts  for  Us
 rapid  return  to water and son  (NRC,  1979).
     Ammonia  Is a  basic  compound,  which commonly occurs  In the environment  as
 the  positively charged  ammonium  Ion.   Ammonia/ammonium  1on  1s  an  Integral
 part  of  the  nitrogen cycle,  and  Its  concentration  1n  water  and soil  Is  1n
 constant flux  (NRC, 1979).
     Nitrification  1s  Important  In reducing the accumulation of ammonia  In
 receiving  waters.   The process of nitrification proceeds In two steps  each
 mediated by different bacterial genera:
                                 NUrosomonas
                            NH{	>- NO?

                                   NUrobacter
                             NO?	*- N03
 This   process  depends   upon   available   oxygen,   temperature,   pH  and  the
 mlcroblal  population  (WHO,  1986).  Nitrification may  lead  to  depletion  of
 dissolved  oxygen  and  acidification.  In  addition  to  nitrification, physical
 adsorption and chemical  binding to suspended solids  and sediments,  volatili-
 zation to  the atmosphere, and  assimilation  by  algae  and macrophytes can  also
 be  Important  removal  processes.    Thus,  1t appears  that the  half-life  of
 ammonia  In water  1s  highly variable,  depending upon  such  factors as  dis-
 solved oxygen content, type of  mlcroblal  species and  microbe  concentrations,
 pH,  temperature,  current speed and wind velocity  as well  as other  factors
 (U.S. EPA,  1981).

0075h                               -1-                             10/16/86

-------
                                   TABLE  1-1

     Selected Physical and Chemical Properties and Half-Lives for Ammonia
    Property
         Value
   Reference
Chemical class:


Molecular weight:

Vapor pressure:

Water solubility:

PKD:

Half-lives:
  A1r:
  Soil:
Inorganic nitrogenous
compound

17.03

10 atm at 25°C

5.29xlO» mg/l at 20°C

4.77 at 20°C
16 days (less In polluted air)
days to weeks (1n the
unadsorbed form 1n warm,
moist soils)
Oones, 1973

Jones, 1973

HSDB, 1986


NRC, 1979
007 5h
         -2-
       10/16/86

-------
     In  soil,  the  ammonium  Ion  Is  fairly  Immobile.   The  ammonium  Ion  Is
 adsorbed onto the negative adsorption  sites of  clay found In all soils, and
 the  Ions that  are not  clay-fixed  undergo bacterial fixation  to nitrate In
 soil  (t,/? - days  to weeks  In warm,  moist  soils).   In addition, relatively
 small  quantities of  ammonia  are  mineralized and  transferred  to plants.  If
 fertilizers   are  applied   without   thorough  Incorporation  Into  the   soil,
 relatively  large  amounts   (up  to  50%)  of ammonia  nitrogen  as  gaseous NH_
                                                                            0
 may  volatilize  rapidly  under  hot, dry  and windy conditions (NRC,  1979).
0075h                               -3-                              10/16/86

-------
           2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL  ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Ammonia,  which  1s a  by-product  of  protein and nucleic  acid metabolism,
Is  readily absorbed by the gastrointestinal  tract.   Summersklll and Wolpert
(1970) estimated  that of the 3080 mg ammonia  produced  1n  the human  gut/day,
-99%  1s  absorbed.  In healthy  Individuals,  absorbed  ammonia  1s  mainly  con-
verted to  urea  In the liver  so  that  relatively small  amounts reach  systemic
circulation.
    In a  study by  Conn   (1972),  9  mg ammonium chloride/kg  was  administered
orally  to  20 healthy adult  men  and women  and  to  50 male patients  with
cirrhosis  of  the  liver.   Normal  Individuals  showed only  a  transient  Increase
In  ammonia concentrations 1n  arterial  blood.  Concentrations peaked  (mean,
140  tig  ammonia/100  ml)  at  15  minutes  and   returned  to fasting  levels
(mean, 105 yg ammonia/100  mi) by  30 minutes.  About  SOX of   the  subjects
showed no   significant rise  In  arterial  ammonia concentrations.   Individuals
with  cirrhosis  of the liver, who had higher   fasting ammonia levels  (mean,
150  yg ammonia/100  ml),  showed much  higher  blood  ammonia  concentrations
(mean, 370 yg ammonia/100  ml)  at  15 minutes, followed by  a slow  decrease
that  reflected  Impaired  hepatic urea synthesis.   In drrhotlc patients  with
portacaval anastomoses,  ammonia  blood levels were  significantly higher  than
In patients without shunts.
    Absorption of ammonia from  the  human colon,  the  major   site  of ammonia
production.  Increases with Increasing  pH of  the  lumlnal  contents  (Castell
and Moore,  1971).  As pH  Increases  more ammonia Is In  the  non-Ionized  form
and can diffuse from the gut.
0075h                               -4-                              10/16/86

-------
     There 1s also evidence for the active transport of ammonium  ion  from  the
 gut.   At  a  lumlnal  pH  of 5,  a pH  at which  un-1on1zed ammonia  would  be
 virtually absent. Castell  and Moore  (1971)  showed that ammonia  transport by
 the colon,  although  greatly diminished, still  occurred.   Hossberg and Ross
 (1967)  studied the absorption  of ammonia from  Isolated  Intestinal  loops  of
 the golden  hamster  and  concluded  that  the  preferential  site  for  ammonia
 uptake  Is  1n  the  lleum.   In the  Heum, but  not  In  the jejunum,  ammonia  was
 found  to move against  a  concentration gradient.  Cyanide, d1n1trophenol  and
 anaeroblosls Inhibited  ammonia  movement  In  the  1leum,   suggesting  that  an
 energy-dependent  transport system was  operable  In the 1leum  but not In  the
 jejunum.   Heal   transport  was  not  found  to  be  dependent on  pH or  ammonia
 gradients  but was observed to  be dependent  on  carbon dioxide and carbonate
 concentration,   providing  additional  evidence   that  Ionic   NH*  was   the
 species  being actively  transported (Hossberg  and Ross, 1967; Hossberg, 1967).
 2.2.   INHALATION
    Because  1t Is water  soluble,  low concentrations  of ammonia  are largely
 absorbed  In  the  mucous  coating  of the upper respiratory tract, thus protect-
 ing the  lungs from exposure.   Landahl  and Herrmann (1950)  found nasal reten-
 tion  of   ammonia  to  be "83%  In  humans with mean minute  volumes  of 6-7  l,
 exposed  to  0.05  mg/i  ammonia  for  short durations  (<120 seconds).   Total
 retention  determined  at  ammonia  concentrations  between  0.04  and  0.35  mg/i
 (40  and  350  mg/m3)  was  92+2%  for   two  male   subjects  tested  4  times.
 Retention was Independent of ammonia concentration over the range tested.
    Sllverman  et  al.  (1949)  exposed seven male  volunteers to 500  ppm (350
mg/m3) for  30 minutes.   Average  Initial ammonia  retention was  not  report-
ed, but  In  the  one example shown, Initial  retention was -75%.   Retention
decreased  progressively  until  equilibrium was  reached  In 10-27  minutes.


0075H                               -5-                              10/16/86

-------
Retention  at equilibrium  averaged 23%  (range  4-30%).   Some  Irritation  was
observed  In  the nose and throat,  leading  the authors to  suggest  that  at  the
concentration used,  ammonia was primarily absorbed by  the  upper  respiratory
tract.   BUN,  nonproteln nitrogen,  urinary urea and urinary  ammonia  remained
normal  1n these  subjects.   This  1s  In  contrast to  results reported  In  an
abstract  of a  Russian  study  (Kustov,  1967}  In which  human subjects were
exposed  to 20 ppm  (14  mg/m3)  for  8  hours  and  significant  Increases  In  BUN
were observed.
    Egle   (1973)  studied  ammonia   retention  In  anesthetized  mongrel  dogs
(7-37/experlment).   Total  respiratory tract retention  averaged  78% and  was
not related  to  changes  In ventilation rate (5-30/m1nute) or  ammonia  concen-
tration  (214-714  ppm or  150-500 mg/m3).  The  duration of exposure was  not
reported.  To measure  ammonia  retention  for the upper  and  lower  respiratory
tracts  separately,  Egle (1973)  severed  the  trachea  just above the  bifurca-
tion.   Retention  In  the lower  tract  alone averaged 78%.    Retention  again
averaged  78% when  ammonia  vapor  was drawn  through the nose and  out  the
trachea  and  then returned.   In one-way passage from  the  nose through  the
trachea,  retention  averaged 88%,  Indicating  that  concentrations of  Inhaled
ammonia  reaching  the  lungs were  substantially lower  than  ambient  concen-
trations.
    Schaerdel et al. (1983)  exposed four groups of rats  (8/group)  to  average
ammonia  concentrations  of 11,  23,  220 or 826  mg/m3.   Ammonia In the  blood
was measured  at 0,   8,  12 and 24  hours.   At  the two lowest  concentrations,
there was  no Increase  In  blood  ammonia.  At  the two higher  doses,  signifi-
cant Increases  at  the  8-hour  time  point were  noted.  After  12 and 24  hours
the Increases were not as marked.
0075h                               -6-                              10/16/86

-------
                3.  TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
 3.1.    SUBCHRONIC TOXICITY
 3.1.1.    Oral.   The oral  toxlclty of ammonia  has been  studied  using ammo-
 nium  salts as  the dosing agents, and  the results of  these  studies  will be
 presented 1n  this document even though many effects such as metabolic addo-
 sls observed  were  the  result  of  the  anlon  rather than effects attributable
 to  ammonia.   Only  those studies  performed at   doses  sufficiently   low to
 suggest thresholds  are  discussed here.
    Lemann  et  al.  (1966) studied the electrolyte  balance  of five  men  who
 received ammonium  chloride.   After  control  observations were  made,  the  men
 were  given  total  oral  doses  of  733 mEq  ammonium  chloride  over  a  6-day
 "loading period"  (-93  mg/kg/day),  followed by  a  total of 2771  mEq from days
 7-18  (-177  mg/kg/day).   Serum  bicarbonate  levels  dropped   Initially  but
 stabilized  by  day 12 of  treatment and  rose  slightly between  days  12  and  18,
 despite the retention  of  add that  occurred throughout  the  study.  Calcium
 and phosphorus were lost during  treatment,  suggesting to the authors  that
 the slow resorptlon of  bone  mineral  was  providing an  additional  buffering
 capacity.   The  U.S.  EPA (1981) reviewed  several short-term studies 1n humans
 that  Indicated  that  metabolic  acldosls,  Impaired  glucose  tolerance  and
 reduced  tissue sensitivity  to  Insulin  may  result  from  doses of  ammonium
 chloride  >100 mg/kg/day.   Although frank  effects  were  not reported, the U.S.
 EPA (1981)  expressed concern for  the potential for  bone demlnerallzatlon as
 a result  of Impaired acid-base balance.   The U.S.  EPA (1981)  calculated  100
mg/kg/day of ammonium chloride to be equivalent to 31.8 mg/kg/day  ammonia.
0075h                               -7-                              10/16/86

-------
    Freedman  and  Beeson (1961) gave  12  adult  male Sprague-Dawley rats  1.6X
ammonium  chloride In  their  drinking water  for  up to  3  weeks and  examined
them  for  evidence of  renal  Injury.   Ur1nalys1s and  gross  and  hlstopatho-
loglcal examinations  of the  kidneys  at  necropsy revealed no  abnormalities.
Glutamlnase  activity  per g  of kidney Increased  with  duration of exposure.
Indicating a  physiological adaption to addosls.  An additional 10 rats  were
treated as above,  but  were then given drinking  water  containing  1%  ammonium
chloride  for an  additional  2.5 months.   These   rats  also  had no  gross  or
microscopic  renal abnormalities.   No  data  on   water  consumption  or  body
weights of the  rats  were provided; therefore,  a  precise dally  Intake  cannot
be  calculated.   Assuming the  rats weighed 250 g and  drank  25 ml of  water/
day, the rats given the  1.6X concentration  or  the IX concentration In  drink-
Ing water  could have  Ingested  as  much as  1.6 and  1.0 g/kg bw/day, respec-
tively, resulting In  a TWA  Intake  of  ammonia   of "360  mg/kg/day.    Actual
Intakes may have been  lower  because ammonium chloride  1s known  to affect the
appetite and may render the water less palatable.
    In a study  by  Gupta  et al.  (1979), ammonium  sulfamate was  given  "orally"
to  adult  female  rats  and weanling  male and  female  rats   ITRC  colony-bred
albino) at 100,  250  or 500 mg/kg  bw/day,  6 days/week  for  30,  60  or 90  days
as a 10%  solution  1n  water.   Twenty  rats/sex/age/dose leve< were used.   The
effective   dose  of ammonia  at  each  dose  level   1s difficult  to  determine,
since under certain conditions, sulfamate  Ion  1s  hvdrolyzed-to  blsulfate 1on
and ammonia,  and  whether  this  hydrolysis occurs  1n  the  *at  Intestine  Is
uncertain.  Assuming no hydrolysis, the ammonia doses can be estimated to be
15.0,  37.3 or 74.8 mg  ammonia/kg bw/day.   The  effect of the  anlon, sulfamate
and sulfate  on  the action  of ammonium Is a matter  of  conjecture.  According
0075h                               -8-                              10/16/86

-------
 to Gupta  et  al.   (1979)  ammonium  sulfamate  would  be expected  to produce
 metabolic  addosls on  the  basis of  Us  structure,  but this result does not
 appear  to  have been verified experimentally.
    The treated  and  control  rats   appeared  to  be healthy,  and  the  only
 significant  weight  difference  was  a slight depression  In  the highest-dose
 adult  females  at  60 and 90 days.  Food and water  consumption were unaffected
 except  In  the  highest-dose weanlings of both sexes, which had  lower food and
 higher  water  consumption  than  did  control weanlings.   At  necropsy, hemato-
 logical  and  hlstologlcal  examinations  were  conducted.    No  significant
 differences  In selected hematologlcal  values  were observed.  Relative organ
 weights  of  all   treated   groups  were  not  significantly  different  from
 controls.   Hlstologlcal  examination of  selected major  organs and tissues
 showed  no  abnormalities  except  slight  hepatic  fatty degeneration  In  one
 adult female at 90  days.
 3.1.2.   Inhalation.   Ferguson  et  al.  (1977)  exposed  six  volunteers  (five
 male  and one  female)  to ammonia  for 5 weeks.  The  volunteers  were divided
 Into  three  groups  and  were exposed  2-6  hours/day  to respective  ammonia
 levels  of  25,  50  and  100  ppm  (17,  35  and  70 mg/m3}.   Exposure  patterns
 varied  among groups, complicating the  Interpretation of  results.   A statis-
 tically  significant Increase In  forced expiratory volume as ammonia concen-
 tration  Increased was  reported.   This Increase  averaged only 4X from the low
 to  the  high dose.   No differences  were  reported among groups  for  respira-
 tion, forced vital  capacity,  pulse  or blood  pressure.   For  the group exposed
 to  a  constant  pattern to 50  ppm over 6 weeks, none of the  variables  varied
 significantly.   The authors  claimed  that  subjects  became  Inured to  eye,  nose
and  throat  Irritation,  but  this  conclusion  was  not  clearly shown by  data
presented (U.S. EPA, 1981).


0075h                               -9-                              10/16/86

-------
    Effects  of  subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure  on  laboratory  animals  are
summarized  In Table  3-1.   Only  two of  these  studies  (Coon  et a!.,  1970;
Broderson et  al.t  1976)  were  performed  at doses  low enough to define thresh-
olds  and were reported  1n sufficient  detail  to permit evaluation  for  risk
assessment.
    Coon et  al.  (1970)  exposed  rats  and  guinea  pigs of both  sexes  and  male
rabbits, monkeys  and dogs to  ammonia,  8  hours/day, 5 days/week for  6  weeks
or  continuously  for  65-114  days.   Ammonia concentrations  used  were 155  or
770  mg/m3  for  Intermittent   exposures  and 40  or  470  mg/m3  for  continuous
exposure,  except  for rats,  which  were  also  exposed  to  455,  262 or  127
mg/m3  continuously.   The  parameters  examined were  hlstochemlcal  determina-
tions,  blood  analyses,   visible  signs  of   toxldty  and  hlstopathologlcal
examination of heart, lung,  liver,  kidney  and  spleen from all  species,  and
brain,  spinal  cord and  adrenals from monkeys and  dogs,  as well as  thyroid
tissue from dogs.
    .The  only  abnormality  observed  In  any  species exposed  to  155  mg/m3
Intermittently was  evidence  of focal pneumonltls  In the lung of one of  the
three monkeys.   At the  770  mg/m3 Intermittent  exposures,  rabbits and  dogs
had mild to  moderate lacMmatlon  and dyspnea during the first  week.   These
signs disappeared  during the  second  week  and no  further signs of  Irritation
or  toxlclty  were  observed.    The  only  other  observation  noted was rather
consistent  nonspecific Inflammatory changes In the  lungs of  exposed  rats  and
guinea pigs that  were more extensive  than  1n control animals.
    No signs  of  toxlclty were observed In  any  species exposed  continuously
to ammonia at 40 mg/m3  for  114  days.  R?ts exposed continuously to  ammonia
at  127  mg/m3 also showed  no  specific  chemically-Induced  changes.   At  262
0075h                               -10-                             10/20/86

-------

























VI


•
IV


C
o
41
a
VI
O
O.
X

e
o
IV
|
w
^
o
•g
a
v>
ik
o
u
«k

















01
u
e
41
BC

















VI

I
14^
u














O

k
^


_
Ol M
VI E
00-
^^


i
*

X
Si
k
•v

4)

U
£•
.

10
01
§0
r-
u •—

i
!=-
•V «• IV

Ik I/I VI
c oi ~
•- 01 u
U *9 tk
Ik U 41

O i— O
*> "0 C
CX u
VI ^ • •
c oi e
SO 01
r— Ol
o •-
•Of 0.
O ^L ^
£ O O
VI >>
VI ^ 41
O>J= C
e -o
30--
^™ C Jtf
• •• •
• VI k
a oi oi
•x o> > •


r- x k
k io m



x^c*
IV 01
VI >. V»
3 X 01
O iv 01
GO m so

•n
r—
O


a.
a
0
o>
m

01
*5
S-v 01
VI f
i e iv
4»  oi
0>U4 *•»
•V i
k Ol-O

Oi O iv
^^ ^J
VI 01
si i
•

*
«*
01
o e»




























41
_g
IV
IV

I



x.^
IV Ol
"w-^ vi
3 X Ol
GO m «o

in
£
o
i~


3
O
Ol
in

•v.
o
41
> 01
•• e to


M 41 IV
41 U
e e 41
let S
•

*
**
01
e o
S?
o •—
i

u
i— O
e
•0
c ••
Ol
n) 01
e

!/• C
X 0
•O u
01
• VI
•J c
41 «-
^ 01
VI k
k IV
— 41

Q. E
k IV "5

»•» •" 11
IV U1
vi in
• C r-

B> vi iv
•• VI
0 C —
l~ O u
P« ^ 4>
•* Ik
22t



>«^
•V 01

a *» oi
O IV 41


TJ
e
*v
8


** V.

ft •*•
II
:

•V
**
41
CO
0 l~
"*""



























01
o
IV
VI
t^
5S

3 X 01
O IV Ol
J= -0 I
GO m we

m
in
r~
O

r-
o.
g
CM


«
1
"w
IV

£1
^^
Si
o
:

IV
«4
41
e o
!£



^


VI
in —
in u
— 41

iV 01


vi oi

u — *
41 O
Ik O
4) e
oi rT
•* •*+
k /—
o
o. c
41 —

VI
O —
^
• e
» Q
E E
e
r- •—
r» iv
u



>» J<
iv Oi

a x oi
O IV 41
£ 9 X

m
^
e


o.
a
o
o>
^w
n


^;
41
i


k

•- 4t
J"!
-

IV
01
e o
12



•w


*•»
e
i

,*
O vi
> ^
e •—


o> o
si
I- 41
e
— Q.
e
Ol <—
w IV
VI ^

VI •—
c —
O vi
U k
• • 5
*'
« 41
VI
— a
M  S
Oluj ik

oe m fl








IV
VI — ^
iv e
e o

o ^^
c v e

31
e x
o. at
Vf
>»^™
•o 

2 g
u •
m X
•O vi —
e u
F- O —
IV *" X VI
vi vi o Ol
C •— .vi
O vi 41
O i— C «- >
f- IV —• O
^ o • .a
E *• vi k iv
01 f 0
•O O — • VI
IV •— IV v< IV

xs 's, i
S2. £a d




VI VI VI
3 a - s
• O • O vi O
vi 3 ma x a
x e x_e iv _c
•o Z -v ^ ^
O O O O i— O
— u



 • 3|
Ol O
*• e

^^ ^
r- •*
— "c

m s

>. 01
Q.
• ^

O vi
r» k
» 01
55




VI
- 3
• VI O
VI X 3
X IV C
IV 0 —
19 •*
O — 0
en i— u



o a


&
3
O
o>
in

^
^3
01
> 41
£!•"
Q. O -O
•^ e
IV 41 IV
41 U
C 5i£
let i
0075h
-11-
10/20/86

-------




































~
1
u
1—
1
pi


09
*y

<^





























41
£•
41
41
41
at
















VI
u
41
*k
kk
UJ














S
e


•q
k.





_

o -v
ay


41
1
*

M
41

^k.
e
iq
'C
41

U
q
iq —
i_ > —
i_ O u»
X 41
41 «•>••••
X — C
•q
•o a. 41
4> O ">
.M 3
k ^ . £ k,
J7>— ' O
k
O 41 41
•cS'S







1^1
* 3
-xi
x 



e o
"*

3
O
k.
01
CO

TS
C

^B
•q
41
*3
•* **.

A « *
ii












• •

^^
(M
e
c
0

•«i»
41
Ol
e
o
u
c
3

K


21"

|S

vt
C flt
|£
o, c




































•
•
fq

41
C O
O r-
o en
u *-
k.
o
e »—
o »o u •
^ u *•• S
•«• O 9V.
iq *k  O V
•q 01 ••*
41 A £ <9
X u
*- VI «*
•o -o — u
41 — »l

ail*
c 3 e
.. 4i e

£ c a. •>
— • O  m F-
0 5 i 5
U VI Ol
. iq k C
Ii f— 41 3
2 41
S-=Si
siii.s







VI

vi* X 3
X iq e

^3 ^^
o 2 i
en i— u



e e
^» «*


3
O
ev



Of
fm
\
?
^

VI
J

•
•
iq

41
e o
§7
u —

t
V
««
e

41
VI
3
H °


•*
O
VI

iv u
U 4>
e 
r>


^^
VI
^^
4)
•-
k

^ 41
ta

09
M
?
^3 •

2 "<*
U
at 4i



X

o
1

Ik VI
c .*
~- 41
•o x
e
iq 09

§•?
^^ ^^
iq O
«« e
^»
k •-
k 3

xr>
o —
— • >q
k e
»- 41
a. 4i
VI VI
41
k VI
e
k O
01 ^~
s s




•
IK

41 vi

3
to c

k «*
°§
0 u

CM

5
CO
•o •—
41 0
O «••
M O
41 u
r» r»
CM CM

41

a
a.
<
o
•v.
VI
5

^3
^*
C ^
o
1. •
•S **9
S —
CO 01

3

*fl
vt
O
I
"iq


c
k
o

k
41
C


u^
O

VI VI
4i Ol
Ol C
e s
u k
o
U 41
O> U
e <9

ll







VI
3
• O
vi 3
x e
iq —
•o -•
e
kn o
r« u
e
•o
• 41
•» ft
CM
O k

41 "o
O •*•
X O
41 U
e o


V
l^
a. 41
c!
al
4) -O
Vi Iq

vi oi
51

^9
r»
§2

k •
•§ *iq
k «^
aa 4i

























4l
|
VI
iq
1







VI
3
• O
v> 3
x e

•o ~
e
kO O
c^ u
u

10  CM
•q kn



VI *>
^ e
4) 41 ••
41 t> -a
OD vi k
f— 4>
k o -a
41 O
+* e
to 9 vi
— 01
• - VI C
«• 4i iq
M Ol£
4i e u
41 O
3 w Oi
e
CM ^ 3
r- 41 »— C
X 41


vi a*
10 e vT "*
k iq x c
4) X 41 ••
•~ 4) C
 O> C 4>
C O iq ^
£ O k VI
k) ••* 4t Q
iHl


VI
J*
41


>q 4)

VI ^
k VI •
3 XCM

* "° .
«A krt «0


CM
2
"
41 0
O «•
x o
41 U
CM >e



41

1
VI
Ol
"eL
iq
41
C
i
e IA
•q i—
on
5"
• -
"o. o
2 f
O vi
k 3
a. x
VI
§*•
^,
JZ u
vi e
o
VI k
3 k
CL
•o
e •
iq >q
» ^



O 4>
u
O i—
J< <9
3 —
41 ~*

V VI VI

e ^ —
.«_ 3
* u
l^.i
U k
§e 41
4) a.
^™ XI
•• > c
< 4> iq


4)
** VI
3 k
e 3 vi

8 
O k
4» k
kn > e
CM 4) kk



§




ec
z








VI
19
at
































































•o
41

|
*•
2

g
oe
OQ75h
-12-
10/20/86

-------
 mg/m3, -25%  of  the 49  rats  exposed had  mild  nasal discharge.  Nonspecific
 circulatory and degenerative changes In  lungs  and kidneys were observed but
 were difficult to  relate specifically to  ammonia  Inhalation.
     At 455  mg/m3,  32/51  rats  died by  day  25  of  exposure  and by  day 65,
 when the  experiment was terminated, 50  had died.  All rats showed mild  signs
 of  dyspnea  and  nasal  Irritation.   H1stopatholog1cal examinations  were not
 performed on these  rats.
     At 470  mg/m3,  13/15 rats and  4/15  guinea  pigs  died.   Oogs and rabbits
 showed marked  eye Irritation.   At necropsy,  moderate  lung  congestion was
 observed  1n two  rabbits, and one dog had a hemorrhaglc lesion of a lung.  In
 all  animals examined,  hlstopathologlcal  examination showed  focal  or diffuse
 Interstitial  pneumonltls.   Also observed  In  several animals  of each species
 were calcification of  renal  tubular and  bronchial  epHhella,  proliferation
 of  renal   tubular  epithelium,  myocardlal   flbrosls  and  fatty  changes  of the
 liver  plate cells.   These changes  were also  observed 1n  control animals but
 were less  severe.   Throughout  these  experiments  (Coon   et  al.,  1970),  no
 pathological  examinations of the upper respiratory tract were made.
     In  a  study by  Broderson  et  al.  (1976), Sherman and Fischer  pathogen-free
 rats  In  groups  of 10-12  of  each  sex  were  exposed to ammonia from soiled
 bedding  at  153+35  ppm  (105  mg/m3) for  75 days  or to purified ammonia  at
 250±8  ppm  (175 mg/m3)  for 35 days.   Pathological  changes were observed  In
 the  nasal  passages  of  all  exposed  rats.   The  changes observed were  Increased
 thickness  of the respiratory and  olfactory epithelium with  pyknotlc nuclei
 In  many  cells  along  the  basement  membrane  and  hyperplasla of  epithelial
cells  with the formation  of  glandular  crypts.   These  lesions  decreased  1n
 Intensity  posteriorly.   The  submucosa  of  the nasal  passages was widened  by
dilation  of  small  vessels  and edema.  Replacement of submucosal glands  with
collagen was observed and a few lymphocytes and  neutrophlls were present.
0075h                               -13-                             10/20/86

-------
312.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   In  a  study  by Fazekas  (1939),  rabbits  were  treated  with
ammonium  hydroxide  by  gavage at  100 mg/kg  bw on  alternate  days  and  then
dally  for  up  to  17 months.   This  treatment  resulted  1n  enlarged adrenal
glands and  an  Increase  In  blood pressure to 10-30 mm Hg above baseline after
several months of treatment.
    Barzel  and Jowsey  (1969)  gave male  Sprague-Oawley  rats  (250  g,  10-12/
group)  1.5% ammonium  chloride  1n their  drinking  water  and  a regular  or
calcium-deficient  diet  for 330  days.   Rats  on  both diets  showed  statisti-
cally  significant  decreases   1n  bone  (femur)  fat-free  solid  and  calcium
content  as  compared with  controls.    Bone   length  and  plasma  calcium  and
phosphorus  levels  were  unaffected.   Blood pH and plasma carbon  dioxide  were
decreased  only  In   the  regular diet  group.   Rats  1n  both treated  groups
weighed  significantly  less and  had  smaller  accumulations  of  body  fat  than
did control  rats  receiving  the  same diets.   Similar  results  were obtained In
Intact or  ovarlectomlzed  female rats  treated with 1.5%  ammonium chloride In
the drinking water  for  300 days (Barzel, 1975).  A  regular  diet was used In
both groups of rats.
    Lifetime   studies  with  ammonium  hydroxide  In  drinking   water   were
conducted  1n two  strains of mice by Toth (1972).   This  study did not address
noncarclnogenlc endpolnts and 1s not  discussed further  In this  section.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  Pertinent data  regarding  the  effects of chronic  Inha-
lailoi exposure to ammonia could not  be located In the  available literature.
3.3.   TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  teratogenlc  and  reproductive effects  of
ammonia  by either  the  oral or  Inhalation  routes of exposure  could not  be
located In the available literature.
0075h                               -14-                             10/20/86

-------
 3.4.    TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
     Dalhamn  (1963)   found  no   synerglstlc  effect  of  ammonia  and  carbon
 particles  on the  breathing rate of  rabbit  tracheal  c1Ua.   In  the  study  a
 technique  was  used In which an air pollutant mixture could be drawn Into the
 nostrils  and  out  through  a  tracheal  cannula  Implanted  In  a  live  rabbit
 breathing  through  another tracheal opening.
    Zleve  et al.  (1974) found  that simultaneous  Injection  of  an  ammonium
 salt  and  a fatty add Into  normal rats  or cats produced coma at lower plasma
 levels  of  ammonia  and  free  fatty  adds  than  single   Injections  of  the
 compounds.   In  rats,  Injected  sodium  octanoate  or  Inhaled  methanethlol
 Interfered  with the metabolism  of  an Injected dose of ammonium acetate,  as
 evidenced  by  higher  blood  ammonia  levels  than  those resulting  from  the
 ammonium  dose  alone.   The authors  suggested  that  the  synerglsm  of  these
 compounds  plays  a  role  In human hepatic coma.
    Broderson  et  al.  (1976)  Inocculated  pathogen-free  Sherman and  Fischer
 rats  Intranasally with  Hycoplasma  pulmonls  and  then  exposed  the  rats  to
 ammonia  at concentrations  of 25-250 ppm.   A  dose-related  Increase 1n  the
 prevalence  of  pneumonia,  but  not the other respiratory lesions  caused  by M.
 pulmonls. was observed.
0075h                               -15-                             06/16/87

-------
                              4.   CARCINOGENICITY
4.1.   HUNAN DATA
    No  conclusive  evidence  of   the  carcinogenic  potential  of  ammonia  In
humans was  found;  however,  evidence  that  suggests  the  possibility  of ammonia
playing an  Indirect role In Inducing cancer In humans Is available.
4.1.1.   Oral.   The higher  Incidence  of  colonlc  cancer  In  countries  with
populations  that  consume diets high In  animal  protein and low In  fiber  may
provide  some  evidence  that  ammonia  has  an  etlologlc  role  In this  cancer
(Vlsek et  a!., 1978)  .  A  major  detoxification product of protein  1s  urea.
Approximately  25X  of  this  urea 1s  excreted  Into  the  Intestinal tract  where
It  1s  hydrolyzed by bacterial urease  to ammonia  (U.S.  EPA,  1981).   BurkHt
(1975) noted  that  the Incidence  of  polyps and  cancers are highest  1n  areas
of the large bowel  where ammonia  concentrations are  highest.  BurkHt  (1978)
hypothesized that  the  role  of fiber In reducing colon  cancer Is a  result of
Its  ability  to  enhance excretion  of  nitrogenous  products.    Fiber  also
provides an Increased level  of  fatty  acids, which  decreases  the  pH of  the
colon and provide anlons to trap free ammonia (Cunnings, 1981).
    Tannenbaum  et  al.  (1978, 1980)  and  Tannenbaum  and  Young (1980)  also
suggested that amonla may be  converted to  nitrite  In  the small  Intestines by
heterotrophlc  nitrification  and  then  react  to form N-nHroso carcinogens.
This  suggestion  has  been  disputed  by Witter  et al.  (1981);  the role  of
ammonia In such a process has not  been  proven.
4.1.2.   Inhalation.  Shlmkln  et  al.  (1954)  reported  an  Isolated  case of  a
white male  who showed evidence  of epidermal carcinoma of the nasal  septum
within 6  months after being  accidentally .burned  by  a ammonia-oil  mixture.
This case may represent a coincidental  chain  of  events.
0075h                               -16-                             06/16/87

-------
     Blttersohl  (1971)  commented on  the numerous cancer  cases occurring  In
 workers who deal  with ammonia  In  an  East  German factory.  Ammonia exposure
 levels were described  and  concomitant  exposures  to asbestos were mentioned,
 but no  Information  concerning  the population  exposed,  exposure duration  or
 cancer rates was provided.
 4.2.    BIOASSAYS
 4.2.1.   Oral.   Toth   (1972)  administered   ammonium hydroxide 1n  drinking
 water  at 0.1,  0.2 or  0.3%  to male and female Swiss mice  for their lifetime.
 Inbred male and female C3H mice were provided with  drinking water containing
 1.0%  ammonium hydroxide  throughout their  lifetime.  Average  water consump-
 tion/day was   reported  for  each sex and  dose  group, but animal weights were
 not reported.   Using  an  average  mouse weight  of 30 g,  respective  dose
 estimates  are  290,  490 and 565 mg/kg bw/day  for  Swiss  mice exposed  at 0.1,
 0.2 and  0.3%,  and  270  mg/kg  bw/day  for  C3H  mice exposed  at  1%.   These
 estimates  are  likely  to be  low 1f dose-related  weight  reduction occurred.
 No  carcinogenic  effect  was  noted  In  this  study  (Toth,  1972).   Ammonium
 hydroxide  did  not Increase or  Inhibit  the  development  of adenocardnoma  of
 the mammary gland  In C3H  females, a tumor commonly occurring In this strain.
    In a study by Uzvdlgl  and  Bojan  (1980),  no significant  Increase  In lung
 tumors  was observed  In mice  with  a  high sensitivity to  lung  tumors  after
 receiving  42 mg/kg ammonia  2 times/week  by  gavage for  4 weeks.  Uzvdlgl  and
 Bojan   (1985)   also   found  that   mice  treated  repeatedly   with   dlethyl
 pyrocarbonate  and  ammonia by  gavage developed tumors.  Dlethyl  pyrocarbonate
 alone  did  not  cause lung  tumors.
 4.2.2.   Inhalation.   Pertinent data  regarding  the carcinogenic   potential
 of  ammonia  following  Inhalation   exposure  could  not  be  1oca led  1n  the
available  literature.
0075h                               -17-                             10/20/86

-------
4>.3.   OTHER RELEVANT DATA
    Litton  Blonetlcs,   Inc.  (1975)  reported  that ammonium  sulfate was  not
mutagenlc  In  the  Salmonella and  Saccharomyces  systems.   Other tests  have
suggested  that  ammonia  may have weak mutagenlc activity  1n  lower  organisms.
Ammonia  was  found to  Induce back-mutations  from streptomycin dependence  to
nondependence  In  EscheMchla   coll  but  only  1n treatment  that  left  <2X
survivors  (Demerec et  al., 1951).   Lobashov  and Smlrnov  (1934)  and Lobashov
(1937) found  that  ammonia showed slight mutagenlc activity  1n DrosophUa  In
tests  where  survival was  <2X  after treatment.   Auerbach and Robson  (1947)
observed  0.5X sex-Hnked  lethal mutations In Drosophlla exposed to  ammonia
vapor  1n small  glass  containers,   also  suggesting  a  very slight  mutagenlc
response.   Rosenfeld (1952)  reported  that  ammonia  can  Induce  clumping  of
chromosomes,  arrest  spindle formation  and   result  In  polyploldy  1n  chick
flbroblasts in vitro.
4.4.   WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    No conclusive evidence was  found to  show  that ammonia 1s  carcinogenic  1n
humans or  experimental  animals.   Hutagenlclty  assays  Indicate  that  ammonia
may have slight  mutagenlc  activity  In  lower organisms.   Ammonia  has not been
tested for mutagenlc potential  In mammals.
    Because of the lack of evidence concerning  the carcinogenic  potential  of
ammonia,   ammonia can  be  placed  In  IARC  Group  3,  Inadequate  evidence  nf
carclnogenlclty.   According  to the  EPA  classification system  (U.S.  EPrt,
1986b),  ammonia Is  a   Group D  chemical,  meaning that  there Is  Inadequate
animal evidence of carclnogenlclty.
0075H                               -18-                             05/16/87

-------
                     5.  REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

     The  ambient  water  quality   criterion   for    ammonia  (NH3  and  NH^)
 for  the  protection  of  human  health  Is  35 mg/l  when expressed  as  NH3,  or
 28.8  mg/l  as  ammonia-nitrogen  (U.S.  EPA,   1981).   Because  ammonia  In
 ambient water 1s  a  greater threat to  aquatic  life than  to  human health, a
 maximum  value  for   un-1on1zed  ammonia   of  0.02  mg/l  as  NH   has  been
                                                                 
-------
    The  ACGIH  (1948)  reported  the maximum  acceptable  concentration  for
ammonia  to be  100  ppm (70  mg/m').  which later became  a  TLV.  The TLV  was
reduced  to  50 ppm  (35  mg/m3)   to  protect  against  respiratory  Irritation
(ACGIH,  1963).   The ACGIH  (1971) recommended  a TWA  of  25 ppm  (17.5  mg/m3)
as  the TLV, which was  then  adopted  by  ACGIH (1973) as  the  'maximum  accept-
able  concentration  without  severe complaints)"  and Is  now  the present  TLV
(ACGIH.  1986).   The ACGIH (1986) adopted  35 ppm as a STEL; the OSHA  (1985)
PEL 1s also 35  ppm (50 mg/m3).
0075H                               -20-                             10/20/86

-------
                              6.  RISK ASSESSMENT
 6.1.    SUBCHRONIC  REFERENCE  DOSE  (RfD$)
 6.1.1.    Oral  (RfD-g).   Several  subchronlc  studies  using  animals and  one
 with  humans on  the  effects  of ammonia  salts  were reviewed by  the U.S.  EPA
 (1981);  the more pertinent  data  were  reviewed  In  Section 3.2.1.  Generally,
 effects  occurred In humans  at  dosages lower than  those  that  caused effects
 In  animals.   Gupta et  al.  (1979)  reported  reduced body  weight  In  adult
 female   rats  treated  with  ammonium  sulfamate  for  up   to  90  days at  500
 mg/kg/day,  corresponding  to  74.8 mg ammonla/kg/day.   Lemann  et  al. (1966),
 however,  noted  disturbed  acid-base  balance  1n  humans  receiving  ammonium
 chloride at -149  mg/kg/day  (ammonia  equivalent  of  -47.4 mg/kg/day).   The
 U.S.  EPA (1980a) reviewed shorter-term  studies  In humans  In  which ammonium
 chloride at  100  mg/kg/day,'  equivalent  to  31.8  mg/kg/day  ammonia,   was
 associated  with  disturbed  add-base balance, glucose  tolerance  and  tissue
 sensitivity  to  Insulin.   Animal  models  may, therefore,  be an Inappropriate
 model for the toxldty of  ammonia to humans.  This Issue  Is further confused
 by  the  fact that  the  toxldty  of ammonia has not  been tested;  oral studies
 used  various ammonium  salts,  and  the  contribution  of  the  anlon to  the
 toxldty of the compound Is  difficult to determine.
    The  WHO (1986)  has  suggested a taste  threshold  of  35  mg/l,  which  Is
 felt to  be protective  for health endpolnts.
 6.1.2.   Inhalation  (RfO-,).  The  pharnuicoklnetlcs of  Inhalation  exposure
 to  ammonia  differs  from that oral  of  exposure.   Ammonia  1s absorbed by  the
mucous of  the  upper respiratory  tract,  with very  little reaching  the  lungs
 (see Section  2.2.).    Because ammonia  concentrates In the  upper  respiratory
 tract,  the  first  signs of  toxldty  are  observed at  this site.   Unfortu-
nately,   the  Inhalation studies of  Coon et  al.  (1970)  and Ueatherby  (1952)

0075h                               -21-                             06/16/87

-------
did  not examine  the  upper respiratory tract  for  signs of toxldty.   Upper
respiratory  tract  toxldty  was  observed  1n  the studies  by  Richard et  al.
(1978)  and  Broderson  et  al.  (1976), which  both  used pathogen-free  rats.
Pathological  changes  of  the  respiratory tract  were  observed  at  a  lower
concentration  In  the  study by  Broderson et al.  (1976);  therefore,  that  study
1s the best animal  study available for use In  Inhalation risk  assessment.
    Broderson  et  al.  (1976)  exposed  10 male  and  10  female pathogen-free
Sherman  rats  to  ammonia  at  an average  concentration  of 105 mg/m3  continu-
ously for  75  days.   The pathological changes  observed were Increased  thick-
ness  of olfactory  and respiratory  epHhella  of the  nasal  cavity,  showing
pyknotlc  nuclei  and  hyperplasla.    These  lesions  decreased  In   Intensity
posteriorly.  The submucosa  of the nasal  cavity had edema and small  vessels
were dilated.
    The  LOEL  observed 1n  rats Is calculated by  multiplying  105 mg/m3,  the
exposure  concentration,  by  the  reference rat  Inhalation  rate  0.223 mVday
and by  dividing by 0.35  kg,  the  reference rat weight  (U.S.  EPA,  1980b)  to
obtain 66.9 mg/kg/day  as a LOEL.   Applying an uncertainty  factor of  1000  (10
for Interspecles  extrapolation, 10 for Individual variability, 10  for calcu-
lating  an  RfD-j  from  a  LOEL), a  possible  human RfD-,  for  ammonia of 0.07
mg/kg/day of 4.9  mg/day  may  be calculated for a 70 kg human.  This  value  1s
slightly  less  than  the  RfDj  of  7.0   mg/day calculated   from   the  odor
threshold  as  described  1n  Section  6.2.2.   Since  the  choice  of  the odor
threshold as  the basis  for  the  RfO. reflects  the Inadequacies  associated
with  the animal toxldty  studies,  the  RfD,  of 0.1  mg/kg/day or 7.0 mg/day
for ammonia  Is adopted  as  f.he  RfD-j for ammonia.   Since this  Is  an odor
threshold 1t Is most appropriately expressed as  0.36 mg/m3.
0075h                               -22-                             06/16/87

-------
 6.2.    REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
 6.2.1.    Oral   (RfOQ).   Three  chronic  oral  animal  studies  with  ammonium
 salts  were  available.   In one,  rabbits   treated  by  gavage  with  ammonium
 hydroxide at -100 mg/kg/day (-48.6 mg ammonla/kg/day) by gavage for up to 17
 months  had  enlarged adrenal  glands  and  elevated  blood  pressure (Fazekas,
 1939).   In the other two experiments (Barzel  and Jowsey, 1969; Barzel, 1975)
 rats   of  both  sexes consuming  ammonium chloride at 1.5X  of  their  drinking
 water  (estimated to be 477 mg ammonla/kg/day) for 300-330 days had decreased
 bone content of fat-free solid and decreased  bone content of calcium.  These
 studies  fall to  define  thresholds for  toxldty  to  ammonia  below that (31.8
 mg/kg/day)  associated with disturbed  acid-base balance,  glucose tolerance
 and tissue  response to Insulin  In  humans In very  short-term studies.
    Ammonia  Is  an endogenous molecule produced  In the catabollsm of  proteins
 and nucleic acid and  used In the  synthesis  of  these compounds.   In  humans,
 excess ammonia  1s combined  with  carbon dioxide by the urea cycle.
    Because  ammonia  Is   endogenous,   a  tox1c1ty-based  criterion should  be
 derived   from  an  estimate  of   the  amount of   excess  ammonia  that  can  be
 tolerated without saturating homeostatlc control mechanisms.  Unfortunately,
 studies  us^ng oral  exposure to address  this Issue are  not  available.   The
 following discussion will   attempt  to  define  a  clearly  undesirable level  of
 oral exposure-to  ammonia, as well  as levels that are clearly tolerable.
                                               •
    The  normal  human absorbs  -4 g of  ammonia/day,  primarily from urea  and
 protein  catabollsm  1n the gut  (Summerskill  and Wolpert,  1970).  Using  an
 average body weight of 70  kg,  50-60  mg/kg  Is a  reasonable  estimate of dally
 ammonia uptake.
0075h                               -23-                             06/16/87

-------
    The amount  of  excess  ammonia  that  can  be safely Ingested Is difficult to
define.   Most  studies  have  used  ammonium  chloride  as   the  dosing  agent;
effects  In  these studies are  often the result of  metabolic acldosls  rather
than  effects  of ammonia.   In  the  study by  Lemann  et al.  (1966),  metabolic
acldosls was  Induced  In  five human  males after  a  TWA dally dose of  149 mg/kg
ammonium  chloride  over  an 18-day  period.   In  shorter  studies  (1-8  days)
[reviewed  In  U.S.   EPA   (1981)].  metabolic   acldosls  as  well  as   Impaired
glucose  tolerance  and  tissue   sensitivity  to  Insulin  has  been  Induced  In
humans at  doses of ammonium chloride  as  low as 100 mg/kg/day  (OeFronzo  and
Beckles, 1979;  Hahnensmlth et  al.,  1979; Edelmann et al.,  1967).  In longer-
term  studies  In  experimental animals  (see  Section  3.1.1.),  no  adverse
effects were reported at higher levels  of  ammonia  Intake.
    In theory,  an  RfO can be  calculated  from the LOAEL  In  previous  studies
using  accepted  methodology  (U.S.  EPA,  1980b).    RfOs  calculated  by  this
methodology  (uncertainty factor  of 100   for  short-term  human data  and  a
factor of 1-10  for using  a LOAEL) would range from  0.032-0.32  mg/kg/day,  and
have  been  rejected by  the U.S.  EPA  (1981)  as being  unreasonably  low when
compared with  dally  absorption of  50-60  mg/kg  ammonia  from  the  gut.   In
addition,  there are  no  reports  of   adverse effects  associated  with  the
1ngest1on of  ammonia  salts as  food additives.   Ammonia Ingestlon  from  food
additives  Is  estimated  to average  -0.25  mg/kg/day  (18  mg/day)  and  could
reach -20 mg/kg/day  (-1400 mg/day) In  some  diets (FASEB, 1974).   From  this
Information,  It  Is evident  that an RfO somewhat higher than that calculated
by normal procedures will be protective.
    In lieu of  adequate health data,  the  U.S.  EPA  (1981) used organoleptlc
data to help  pinpoint  acceptable  ammonia  Intake.   In a study  by Campbell  et
al.  (1958)  using taste  "difference tests  of the  triangle type,"  the  taste


0075H                               -24-                             12/31/86

-------
 threshold was  determined  to  be  34  mg/t.   A  summary by  Pfaffmann  (1959)
 states that thresholds  have  been determined for  ammonium chloride 1n water
 at   53.5,  107   and  482  mg/l  (17-153  mg/l  as   ammonia).    How  much  the
 chloride  Ion contributes to the detection of ammonium  chloride  Is  uncertain.
 Details  of  the  studies  finding these  thresholds  were  not available;  there-
 fore,  a meaningful  comparison with the  Campbell  et  al.  (1958) study  cannot
 be  made.   Because  of  the uncertainty  In  taste  threshold  determination,  the
 U.S.  EPA  (1981)  concluded that the palatabHUy of water  Is not likely to be
 significantly  affected  by total  ammonia levels  <35  mg/l  (as NH-).   This
                                                                    •J
 Is  the same  conclusion reached by  WHO  (1986).
    The   U.S.   EPA  (1981)  recommended  35   mg/l  (28.8  mg/l  as  ammonium
 nitrogen)  as the  ambient water quality  criterion to  protect  human  health.
 Since  this criterion level  Is based upon an organoleptlc level rather than
 upon  systemic  toxlclty   It  would  be  Inappropriate  to extrapolate  an RfDQ
 value  1n  units of  mg/kg/day.   However, there 1s  consensus  that the  35 mg/l
 level  Is  below that  which would contribute to  adverse health  effects  as  an
 additional  ammonia  Increment  from contaminated water.  The actual "accept-
 able"  level  In  terms   of health  endpolnts may  be  higher  but   cannot  be
 accurately projected based upon available data.
    In  determining the  RQ for ammonia, CS values  were  calculated  (U.S. EPA,
 1983).  The values  calculated from  oral data  are presented  1n Table 6-1.
 The  highest  CS  for  ammonia  was  from  an  Inhalation study   and  will  be
 presented  In Section 6.2.2.
 6,2.2.    Inhalation  (RfO,).   There  were   no   chronic Inhalation  studies
 available  for  ammonia.   One approach  for deriving an  RfO,  Is  to  d1v1.de  the
 RfDSI  by  an  additional  uncertainty  factor  of  10.    An  RfD,   of  0.007
0075H                               -25-                             06/16/87

-------
               X
               e
           —i   «
           OQ    o -o JB Q.   -o
  — C  L.   l«
  I •* iq C O
                                v iv  —
                                «"- H
                                i a a
 'I'""
 b. a u •• 91   m
 u u «-•— c  ^
 «> u i« o o   e
e <« u «i d  ui
X u  —
10 ••  >>

^5  €


I?
                               m e o f—
100 «g/kg bw/d

or 17 months

1100 wg/kg/day
llM

xid
Amo
yd
                   vn
                   (V
                                                  o

                                                  ^
                                                  u
                   X

                   e>
                   j<

                   e
                   p»

                   x

                  «
                  •N.


                   ^>
                   Jt

                   e
                   ^

                   4*



                   I


                   i
                                                      I
                                                  il!
                                                   *  S
0075H
        -26-
10/20/86

-------
 mg/kg/day or 0.49  mg/day for a  70  kg human can  be  calculated.   Because of
 the large amount  of uncertainty  In  this value and  because  the  value seems
 unreasonably low,  U Is  not  recommended as  the  RfDj.
     In  a review of  all  the  ammonia  Inhalation  studies, Carson et al. (1981)
 recommended  that,  because of  the lack of  studies  of the  effects of ammonia
 at  low  concentrations,   the  odor threshold,  3.6  mg ammonla/m3,  should  be
 the upper bound of  the  range  of  concern.  Applying an uncertainty factor of
 10, 0.36  mg ammonla/m3  was  recommended as the  lower bound limit  of  the
 range  of concern.    In contrast,  WHO  (1986)  concluded that the best estimate
 for an  odor  threshold  was  35  mg/m3  with  sensitive  Individuals  potentially
 able   to  detect  -3.5  mg/m3.   WHO  (1986)  did   not  draw  any  conclusions
 concerning limits  for acceptable exposure.  The concentration  In air  of  3.6
 mg/m3  1s  substantially   below  the TLV   of  25  ppm (-18  mg/m3)  recommended
 by  ACGIH  (1986) Intended  to protect  against ocular  and  respiratory Irrita-
 tion  and  may serve  as   the  basis for  an  RfD,.   Since  0.36 mg/m3  1s  the
 lower  bound   limit  of the range  of  concern, 1t  should not be necessary  to
 apply  an  uncertainty  factor   of 10  for  unusually   sensitive  Individuals.
 Using  a  70  kg  human  reference  body  and an Inhalation  rate  of  20  mVday,
 the corresponding  dosage  Is 0.1  mg/kg/day  or 7.0  mg/day  for  ammonia.   This
 value  1s  slightly  larger than  4.9  mg/day  calculated  as  a possible  RfDSj-
 Since this value 1s  based on potential Irritation  and odor detection follow-
 ing Inhalation  exposure,  1t  Is  most appropriately  expressed  as  the  air
 concentration.
    CSs  for  ammonia  from Inhalation  studies are presented  In  Table 6-2,  and
were calculated using the method Indicated.  U.S.  EPA  (1983)  calculated  CSs
 using an older  methodology.   HEDs  were  calculated assuming th?t Inhalation
exposures  result In  equivalent  absorbed doses 1n mg/kg/day among  species  and


0075h                               -27-                              06/16/87

-------



















CM
1
IM
•J
i

































"c
"o
.?
—
o

§
*•
2
e
i
£
ti
k
J
i>
yt
e
1
w













•I
S
II

ac

u

S*




1








«
ac
*-
u >»
i!
X



«• .**
^>
s<
tfi O>
al
K
IM



K

W
it
i

•
*
*
CO
§5
U r-

5

0
,i9 «»v- C IB IB Jt ~
U — W k U •*
k it e — — ^ a
$01 - ..- DI Q.£ 8 —
•ivivik O *••'•—•
— •o-o^^ 'JJJ^^Jj
•g*2| si*;*-
— •- e fe t» i_ e «-s ^

ji J* « ^ "^ _? ** ^^ *" ^
9CfOMD 1. T| .1 V* &.V
c ^ <" u «•• 3 m v»
5155? 5-5^712


0} ,0
D CM

* 1




if •=
MO? e
k i— 3
3 e
•k "S 'c ^»
*-5 S-5
^ <> ? S?"1 ?
91 « e in kr-
*• f e e •
e k
IB e
§2
2 S
»• k
k
k k

ft
IB 3


C


u
r*
^



>»
•A
§
«* >•
§ 5
W v> >»
• "5 j«

sp
e k CM
jft O CM


«


*
5
01
*
g

»
I '
2
i
v>
a
>B
^
•
S
o
ei
•1
t
W*
««.*
*V
4.
jj
•jj
k
§
•••
|
•o
e
•
si
|s
«r
if-
K
«













6
B>
e
k
e
Ik

**
!
1
s»
^
X
n
e

—
o>
<••
$
i
e
IB
K
>.
€
>
,M
•^
r

VI
o
1
e
i
i
i
i
j?




























41
k
3
M
€1
U
W
e
m
**
<*
•i

|
«••
^
l_
O
o
*
T9
U
0075D
-28-
12/31/86

-------
 using an  absorption  efficiency  of  0.5 (U.S.  EPA,  1983).  Because  of  the
 different  methods of  calculating HEDs, the CSs  1n this document are higher
 than  those reported In  U.S.  EPA  (1983).  The highest CS, 19, was calculated
 for  hlstopathologlcal effects  1n the  liver,  kidney, adrenal and  spleen of
 guinea  pigs  exposed  Intermittently  to 119 mg/m3  (Heatherby, 1952).
 6.3.    CARCINOGENIC  POTENCY (q^)
    Ammonia  has  not been  shown  to  be carcinogenic by  either   the  oral or
 Inhalation routes  of exposure;  therefore, no q,*  values can be calculated.
0075h                               -29-                             06/16/87

-------
                                7.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial Hyg1en1sts).   1948.
Transactions of the 10th Annual Meeting, Boston, March 27-30.  p. 30.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1963.
Threshold Limit Values for 1963.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 3.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1971.
Documentation of  the  Threshold Limit Values for Substances  1n  Workroom A1r.
Cincinnati, OH.  p. 11.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1973.
THreshold  Limit  Values for  Chemical  Substances and  Physical  Agents  In  the
Workroom Environment with Intended Changes for 1973.   Cincinnati, OH.  p.  10.

ACGIH  (American  Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1986.
Documentation of  Threshold Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure Indices,  5th
ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 27.

Auerbach,  C.  and J.M.  Robson.  1947.   Tests  of  chemical  substances  for
mutagenlc  action.   In: Proc.  Roy.  Soc. Edinburgh.  Sec.  3 B1ol.  628:  284.
(Cited 1n WHO, 1986)

Barzel,  U.S.    1975.    Effect  of chronic  ammonium  chloride  1ngest1on  on
parathyroid-hormone function.   Nephron.  14(15):  339-346.   (Cited  1n  U.S.
EPA, 1981)


0075h                               -30-                             06/16/87

-------
 Barzel,  U.S.  and  J.  Jowsey.   1969.   Effects  of chronic  add and  alkali
 administration on  bone turnover  1n adult rats.  Clln. Sc1.  36(3): 517-524.

 BUtersohl,   G.    1971.    Ep1dem1olog1cal   studies  of   cancer   In   chemical
 Industries.   Arch.  Geschwulstforsch.  38: 198.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1981)

 Broderson,  J.R.,   J.R.  Llndsey  and  J.E.   Crawford.   1976.   The  role  of
 environmental  ammonia  In respiratory mycoplasmosls of rats.  Am. J.  Pathol.
 85:  115-130.

 Burkltt,  D.P.   1975.    Benign  and  malignant  tumors  of   large  bowel,  in:
 Refined  Carbohydrate Foods and  Disease,  Some Implication of Dietary  Fibre,
 D.P.  Burkltt  and   H.G.  Trowell,  Ed.   Academic  Press,   New  York.    p. 117.
 (Cited In U.S. EPA,  1981)

 Burkltt, D.P.  1978.  Workshop V -  Fiber  and cancer:  Summary  and recommenda-
 tions.  Am. J. Cl1n. Nutr.  31: 312.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA,  1981)

 Campbell, C.L., R.K. Dawes, S. Deolalkar  and H.C.  Merrltt.  1958.   Effect of
 certain  chemicals  In water on the  flavor  of brewed coffee.  Food  Res.  23:
 575-579.  (CHed In U.S.  EPA,  1981)

 Carson,  B.L.,  C.M.  Beall,  H.V.  Ellis,  III  and  L.H.  Baker.  1981.   Ammonia
 Health Effects.  Prepared by Midwest Research  Institute for Office  of  Mobile
 Source  A1r  Pollution  Control,  Emission  Control  Technology  Division, U.S.
 EPA, Ann Arbor, MI.  EPA  460/3-81-027.
0075h                               -31-                            06/16/87

-------
.Castell,  DoO.  and  E.W.  Moore.   1971.   Ammonia  absorption  from the  human
colon.  Gastroenterology.  60(1): 33-42.  (Cited fn WHO, 1986)

CFR  (Code of  Federal Regulations).  1986.  21 CFR 170.3.  p. 412-415.

Conn,  H.O.   1972.   Studies of the source and  significance  of blood ammonia.
IV.  Early  ammonia  peaks  after  Ingestlon of  ammonium salts.  Yale J.  Blol.
Med.   45: 543-549.

Coon,  R.A.,   R.A.  Jones,  L.J.  Jenkins,  Jr.  and J.  Slegel.  1970.   Animal
Inhalation studies  on  ammonia,  ethylene  glycol,  formaldehyde,  d1methylam1ne
and ethanol.  Toxlcol.  Appl. Pharmacol.  16:  646-655.

Cummlngs, J.H.   1981.   Dietary  fiber.   Br.  Med. Bull.   37: 65.  (Cited  In
U.S. EPA, 1981)

Dalhamn,  T.    1963.   Effect  of  ammonia  alone  and  combined  with   carbon
particles on  ciliary actlvHy 1n  the  rabbit  trachea jjn  vivo,  with studies  of
the absorption  capacity  of thf  nasal  cavity.  Int. J. Air  Water  Pollut.   7:
531-539.  (Cited In WHO, 1986)

DeFronzo,  R.A.  and A.P.   Bec
-------
 Ecological  Analysts, Inc.   1981.   The sources, chemistry, fate  and  effects
 of ammonia  In  aquatic  environments.  American  Petroleum Institute,  Wash-
 ington,  DC.   (Cited  1n U.S.  EPA, 1981)

 Edelman,  C.M.,  Jr.,  H.  Bolchls,  J.R.  Soriano and H. Stark.  1967.  The renal
 response  of  children to acute ammonium chloride addosls.  Red 1 at. Res.   1:
 452-460.   (CUed  1n  U.S. EPA, 1981)

 Egle,  J.L.   1973.   Retention of  Inhaled  acetone and ammonia  In  the dog.   Am.
 Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.  34: 533-539.

 FASEB  (Federation of American  Societies  for  Experimental Biology).    1974.
 Evaluation  of the Health  Aspects  of  Certain  Ammonium Salts  as  Food  Ingre-
 dients.   Prepared for  the  FDA  under Contract No.  FDA 72-85.    21 p.  NTIS
 PB254-532.   (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1981)

 Fazekas,  I.G.   1939.  Experimental  suprarenal  hypertrophy Induced by  ammo-
 nium hydroxide.  Endokrlnologle.   21: 314-337.   (Ger.)   (CUed 1n  WHO,  1986)

 Ferguson,  W.S.,  W.C.  Koch,  L.B.  Webster  and J.R.  Gould.    1977.    Human
 physiological  response   and   adaptation  to  ammonia.    J.  Occup.  Hed.   19:
 319-326.

 Freedman, L.R.  and  P.B.  Beeson.   1961.  Experimental  pyelonephritis.    VIII.
The effect  of  acidifying  agents on  susceptibility to  Infection.  Yale   J.
B1ol.  Hed.  33: 318.
0075h                               -33-                            06/16/87

-------
Gupta,  B.N.,  RoN. Khanna  and  K.K. Datta.   1979.   Toxlcologlcal  studies of
ammonium  sulfamate  In rat  after  repeated oral administration.  Toxicology.
13(1): 45-49.

HSDB  (Hazardous  Substance Data  Bank.   1986.   Report  No.  162.   National
Library of Medicine.  On-Hne:  April,  1986.

Jones,  K.   1973.   Ammonia.   In:  Comprehensive  Inorganic  Chemistry,   J.C.
Ballar,  Jr.,  H.J.   Emeleus,   R.   Nyholm  and   A.F.   Trotman-Dlckenson,   Ed.
Pergammon Press, New York.  2:  199-227.

Kustov, V.V.   1967.   Means for determining the maximum allowable concentra-
tion  of  toxic  products of  natural  human  metabolism.   Ijn:  Obshshyle Voprosy
Promyshlenoy  Tokslkologll  (General  Questions  of  Industrial  Toxicology),
Moscow.  NASA Technical Translation NASA TT  F-11,358).  p. 63-65.

Landahl,  H.D.  and R.G. Herrmann.   1950.   Retention of vapors  and  gases In
the human nose and lungs.   Arch.  Ind.  Hyg.  Occup. Med.  1:  36-45.   (Cited In
U.S. EPA, 1981)

Lemann, J., Jr., J.R. LUzow and  E.J.  Lennon.   1966.  The effects of chronic
acid  loads  tn  normal  man: Further  evidence for  the  participation of  bone
mineral 1n the defense against chronic metabolic acldosls.   J. CUn. Invest.
45: 1608-1614.
0075h                               -34-                            06/16/87

-------
 Litton  Blonetlcs.  Inc.   1975.  Mutagenlc  evaluation  of  compound FOA  73-42
 ammonium  sulfate,  granular,  food  grade.   Prepared  for U.S.  Food and  Drug
 Administration, Washington, DC.  NTIS PB245-506.  (Cited 1n WHO,  1986)

 Lobashov. M.E.  1937.   Uber die Natur  der  Elnwlrkung  der  chrmlschen  Agentlen
 auf  der Mutations  prozess de:  DrosophUa melanoqaster.  Genetlca.   19:  200.
 (Rus.)  (Cited  1n WHO,  1986)

 Lobashov, M.E.  and  F.A.  Smlrnov.   1934.  Uber  die  Wlrkung  der  Esslgsause aur
 non-disjunction  and  Transgenatlonen  b1e  DrosophUa  melanoqaster.    Dokl.
 Acad.  Sc1.  USSR N.S.   2:  307.  (In Russian with German summary)  (Cited  In
 U.S. EPA, 1983)

 MahnensmHh,  R.,  S.O.  Thler,  C.R.  Cooke,  A.  Broadus and  R.A. DeFronzo.
 1979.   Effect  of  acute  metabolic addenda  on renal electrolyte transport  In
 men.  Metabolism.   28(8): 831-842.

 Mossberg, S.M.   1967.   Ammonia  absorption  In  hamster  lleum.  Effect  of  pH
 and  total  CO.  on  transport  In   everted  sacs.   Am.   J.  Physio!.    213:
 1327-1330.  (Cited  In WHO, 1986)

 Mossberg,  S.M. and  G. Ross.   1967.  Ammonia movement  In the small  Intestine:
 Preferential transport by the  lleum.  J. CUn. Invest.  46: 490-498.  (Cited
 In WHO, 1986)

 HAS  (National  Academy  of Sciences).  1973.  Water  Quality Criterion,  1972.
 HAS,  National  Academy   of  Engineering,  EPA  Ecol.   Res.   Ser.,   U.S.  EPA,
Washington,  DC.  EPA-R3-73-033.  (Cited  In  U.S. EPA. 1981)

0075h                               -35-                            06/17/87

-------
NRC  (National Research  Council).   1979.  Ammonia,   University Park  Press,
Baltimore, MO.  NTIS PB278-027.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety  and  Health  Administration).   1985.   Safety  and
Health Standards.  Code of Federal Regulations.  29:  1910.1000.

Pfaffmann,  C.   1959.   The  sense of  taste.   In.:  Handbook  of  Physiology,
Section  1:  Neurophyslology.   American  Physiology  Society,  Washington,  DC.
p. 507-533.   (Cited In U.S. EPA, 1981)

Prokop'eva, A.S.  and  G.G.  Yushkov.   1975.   Toxicology of ammonia to  animals
repeatedly  exposed for  short  lengths  of  time.   G1g.  Tr.  Prof. Zabol.   9:
54-55.

Richard.  0.,   G.   Bouley  and  C.  Boudene.   1978.   Effets  de  I1Inhalation
continue  drammoniac  chez  le  rat et  la sourls.   Bull.  Europ.  Physlopath.
Resp.  14: 573-582.  (Fre.)  (Cited In WHO,  1986)

Rosenfeld,  M.   1952.    Experimental  modification  of  mitosis  by  ammonia.
Arch. Exp. Zellforsch. Gewebez11cht.   14:  1.   (Cited  In  WHO,  1986)

Schaerdel,  A.D.,  W.J.  White.  C.M.   Lung,   B.H.  Dvorchlck  and  K.   Bohner.
1983.   Localized  and  systemic  effects  of  environmental  ammonia  In  rats.
Lab. Anlm. Sc1.  33: 40-45.

Sh1mk1n,  M.B.,  A.A.  deLar1m1er,  J.R.  Mitchell  and  T.P.  Burroughs.    1954.
Appearance of  carcinoma  following single exposure to refrigeration ammonia-
oil mixture.  Ind. Hyg. Occup.  Med.   9:  186.   (Cited  In  U.S.  EPA,  1981)

0075h                              -36-                            06/16/87

-------
 Sllverman,  L.,  J.L.  WhHtenberger  and  J.  Huller.   1949..   Physiological
 response  of man  to ammonia  In low concentrations.   J. Ind.  Hyg.  Toxlcol.
 31:  74-78.   (Cited  In WHO, 1986)

 Summer skill,  W.H.J. and E. Wolpert.   1970.   Ammonia  metabolism  In  the  gut.
 Am.  J.  CUn. Nutr.   23: 633-639.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA,  1981)

 Tannenbaum,  S.R.  and  V.R. Young.   1980.   Endogenous  nitrite  formation  In
 man.   J.  Environ. Pathol. Toxlcol.  3:  357-368.

 Tannenbaum,  S,R,   D, Fett,  V.R. Young,  P.O.  Land  and  W.R.  Bruce.   1978.
 Nitrite and nitrate are formed  by  endogenous synthesis  In  the  human  Intes-
 tine.  Science.  200: 1487-1489.

 Tannenbaum,  S.R.,  V.R. Young,  I.  Green and  K.R.  Ruiz de LuzuMaga.   1980.
 Intestinal  formation of nitrite and  N-nltroso  compounds.   IARC Sc1.  Publ.
 31:  281-287.

 Toth,  B.    1972.    Hydrazlne,   methylhydrazlne  and  methylhydrazlne  sulfate
 carclnogenesls In Swiss mice.   Failure of ammonium hydroxide to  Interfere  In
 the  development of tumors.   Int. J.  Cancer.   9:  109.   (Cited  1n WHO,  1986)

 U.S. EPA.   1976.  Quality Criteria for Water.   Office  of  Water  and  Hazardous
 Materials, Washington, DC.   EPA 440/9-76-032.

 U.S. EPA.   1980a.    Hazard Profile  for Ammonia.  Prepared by the Office  of
Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office. Cincinnati,  OH for  the Office of  Solid Haste. Washington.  DC.

0075h                               -37-                              06/16/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1980b.   Guidelines and Methodology  for  the  Preparation of Health
Effect  Assessment  Chapters of  the Consent Decree  Water  Criteria Documents.
Federal  Register.  45(231): 49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.    1981.   Ambient Water  Quality  Criterion for  the  Protection  of
Human  Health:  Ammonia.  Prepared  by  the Office of  Health  and Environmental
Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria and  Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH for
the Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.  1983.   Reportable  Quantity Document  for  Ammonia.   Prepared by the
Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria  and
Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the Office  of Emergency and  Remedial
Response, Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1984.   Methodology and Guidelines for Reportable  Quantity Deter-
minations Based on  Chronic Toxlclty Data.  Prepared by the  Office of Health
and Environmental  Assessment, Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office,
Cincinnati,  OH, OHEA for  the Office  of Solid Waste and  Emergency Response.
Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986a.   Reference Values  for  Risk  Assessment.   Prepared  by  the
Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH  for the  Office of Solid Waste,  Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986b.   Guidelines  for  Carcinogenic  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.


0075h                               -38-                             06/17/87

-------
*
               Uzvdlgl,  E.  and F.  Bojan.   1980.   Possible In vivo formation of  a  cardno-
               r                                            ~~ ~—-^~
               genie  substance  from dlethyl  pyrocarbonate  and  ammonia.   J.  Cancer  Res.
               Cl1n. Oncol.  97: 205-207.  (Cited 1n U.S. EPA, 1986b)

               Uzvolgl,  E.  and  F. Bojan.   1985.   ln_ vivo  formation  of  a  carcinogenic
               substance  from  dlethyl  pyrocarbonate  In  the presence  of  ammonia.   Arch.
               Toxlcol. (Suppl).  8: 490-493.

               Vlsek, W.J.,  ,. >     ,nton  and  C.R. Truex.   1978.   Nutrition  and  experimental
               carclnogenesls.  Cornell Vet.  68: 3.  (Cited In U.S.  EPA, 1986b)

               Weatherby,  J.G.   1952.   Chronic toxldty  of ammonia  fumes  by  Inhalation.
               Proc. Soc. Exp. Blol. Med.  81: 300-301.   (CHed 1n U.S.  EPA,  19865)

               WHO  (World Health  Organization).  1986.   Environmental Health Criteria.  54.
               Ammonia.  WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

               Witter,  J.P.,  S.J.  Gatley  and  E.  Ballsh.   1981.   Evaluation  of  nitrate
               synthesis by Intestinal  microorganisms J^ vivo.  Science.   213: 449-450. .

               Z1eve, L., W.M. Oo1zak1 and F.J. Z1eve.   1974.   Synerglsm between  mercaptans
               and  ammonia  or  fatty adds  In  the  production of  coma:  A possible role for
               mercaptans In  the pathogenesls  of  hepatic  coma.   J.  Lab.  Clln.  Med.  83:
               16-28.  (Cited 1n WHO, 1986)
t
i
               0075h                               -39-                            06/16/G7

-------

41
U
91
U
HI
Ik
4t
oc




o
01 u-
u ac
era
41 41 u
b» vi O
V O
 o
ae 

»
c a ra
4» >. -o
E 4> >»
«- U. O»
U 3 .X
4> Vi >s
Q. o g>
X Q. I
LU X —
LU



I/I
Oi
W
U
4>
0.
CO









—
•
19
^^
4>
0
VI p-
U QO
rg 91
*J P"


.Q
« >,
£ <9
•^•o
OOs
S oi
0s
CO O
O 1-^
*
L.
4> O
£ "O
«-> o
u- w
0 0
Ik
ft
«- e
S L.
«- a
p- O
V O
c u
•3 C
o ,
P"
>> 1 K
C r- -O 4> >
O L. C L. —
"•" N, Of fB 4->
** P-I E • o
<« (/) I-IL. (/) O 0>
P- O O O i-< i— 1 CL
IO 0. «- Ib. < < vi
x: oe oe — >
c
p^
CM
LO ,—
9^ t » GQ
p- 00 9>
vn p-
a! ^ _
S* p~ »»o
•a p- < oo
u P- .a. 91
W 0> • LM P-
^Z J3 P—
^^ ^^ IV* • •
•^ bb r^ » •>
5; s co o
flj (T3 •*•• • X
3 <_> u a x




u
91 «(
^ •x
w
2 S

VI C
f 0)
U£i
V
0» P-
n *»
W'B UL
a. 1/1
a»
P" VI
fO >»
u a> ^
»• e <--
O>*0 0
O *— JC
P" ^ VI
^» ^^ ^^
e «
•ti • U
** L. jC
IQ Ol *«
a, >
o •- a>
^p- ^J
VI VI
~ C »
VI fQ
>».* ^ -o
ro a> a» v.
« -o oj a; o>ao
S >. » 3 J< •
•X, VI "^ "V CO •!
O> L. VI 00 O> >v
E s >»•— E u o>
o 19 s
9» JZ -0 U O -O
p- O P- > ^
p- %o m vfc. >— ae co




•9
4i e
C vi «
«- o» e
3 — 3
O» O. £
o
ft
ft
o
c
o

f>
V
ft
i^
u
w
**
w
19
L.
^"*


>t
L.
o
*rf
ra
l_
"a.
vi
4)
U
u
o
^-

r—
>O

<->
e
4>
f
O
ti

•W
(•3
•o
r™*
0
VI
4>
L.
£
«<
^»
I S
« *
4)
«s» rr
^ i
g. a
^ L.
•9 °
L. O
O t-»
Ik
_ ^
« «
5 **
^ •* >.
o» *~^
? ?»^
"• o
1 — ^


to
u
^^
E o
3 CO O
v r- a. VL.
x . X
0 P- 0
Ik P— *•*
ae 19
0 U
fe £1
CO U **
O 41 VI
>
ae co vi

f>
<9
o-
41
TJ
«O
e

4>
L>
<9
<9
^O
•o


3
^3
l_
flj
W
0»
£
4<
A
•o

O
U

u
p*4
<


ganolepttc
L.
O
o
ft
^g
\*
4)
•»->
TJ

'oi
k.
>»
*~
iTj
U
i^°

-------