r
       TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(fttste rtmd I/utnictions on the revent be fort completuifj
 1. REPORT NO.

  hPA/60Q/8-88/024
                               3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                                      PB88-179932/AS
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

   Health Effects Assessment  for Chloromethane
                               6. REPORT DATE
                                                           6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                           •. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME ANO ADDRESS
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME ANO ADDRESS
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT ANO PERIOD COVERED
 Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
 Office  of Research and Development
 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
 Cincinnati,  OH  45268	
                               14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                  EPA/600/22
 is. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
   This  report summarizes and evaluates  information relevant  to  a  preliminary interim
 assessment of adverse health effects  associated with specific chemicals or compounds.
 The  Office of Emergency and Remedial  Response (Superfund) uses  these documents in
 preparing  cost-benefit analyses  under Executive Order 12991  for decision-making under
 CERCLA.  All  estimates of acceptable  intakes and carcinogenic potency presented in
 this document should be considered  as preliminary and reflect limited resources
 allocated  to  this project.  The  intent  in these assessments  is  to suggest acceptable
 exposure levels whenever sufficient data are available.  The interim values presented
 reflect the relative degree of hazard associated with exposure  or risk to the
 chemical(s) addressed.  Whenever possible, two categories of values  have been
 estimated  for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not  the endpoint of
 concern).   The first, RfD5 or subchronic reference dose, is  an  estimate of an exposure
 level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects when  exposure occurs during
 a limited  time interval.  The RfD is  an estimate of an exposure level  that would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects  when exposure occurs for a significant portion
 of the  lifespan.  For compounds  for which there is sufficient evidence of
 carcinogenicity, qi*s have been  computed, if appropriate, based on oral  and
 inhalation data if available.
 7.
                                KEY WORDS ANO DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                  b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Croup
 8. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Public
                  19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)

                    Unclassified
21. NO. Of PAGES
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS fThis page)
                                                Unclassified
                                            22. PRICE
EPA Perm 2220-1 (R*v. 4-77)   PREVIOUS KOITIOM IS OBSOLCTK

-------
                                            EPA/600/8-88/024
                                            February, 1987
          HEALTH EFFECTS ASSESSMENT
              FOR CHLOROHETHANE
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT OFFICE
OFFICE OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
      OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND  DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            CINCINNATI, OH 45268

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER
    This   document   has   been   reviewed   1n   accordance   with  the   U.S.
Environmental  Protection  Agency's  peer and  administrative  review  policies
and approved for publication.   Mention  of  trade  names  or commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                    PREFACE
    This  report  summarizes and evaluates  Information  relevant  to  a prelimi-
nary  Interim assessment  of adverse  health  effects associated  with  chloro-
methane.   All  estimates  of  acceptable  Intakes   and  carcinogenic  potency
presented  1n this  document should  be  considered as  preliminary  reflecting
limited  resources  allocated  to   this  project.   Pertinent  toxlcologlc  and
environmental data  were  located  through on-Hne literature searches  of  the
Chemical  Abstracts,  TOXLINE,  CANCERLINE  and  the CHEMFATE/DATALOG data bases.
The  basic literature  searched  supporting this  document  Is  current up  to
June,  1986.   Secondary  sources of Information have also been  relied  upon In
the  preparation  of  th.1s  report  and  represent large scale  health  assessment
efforts  that  entail  extensive peer and  Agency  review.  The  following Office
of  Health  and Environmental Assessment  (OHEA)  sources  have  been extensively
utilized:

    U.S.  EPA.   1980a.    Ambient   Water  Quality  Criteria  Document  for
    Halomethanes.   Prepared by the  Office of  Health  and  Environmental
    Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment Office,  Cincin-
    nati,  OH  for the Office  of  Water Regulations and  Standards,  Wash-
    ington, DC.   EPA 440/5-80-051.  NTIS PB81-117624.

    U.S.   EPA.    1982.    Errata   for   Ambient  Water   Quality   Criteria
    Document  for Halomethanes.   Prepared  by the  Office  of Health  and
    Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment
    Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for  the  Office  of  Water Regulations  and
    Standards, Washington, DC.

    U.S. EPA.  1983.  Reportable Quantity Document for  Methyl Chloride.
    Prepared  by  the Office   of  Health and  Environmental  Assessment,
    Environmental Criteria and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for
    the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Health  and  Environmental  Effects   Profile  for
    Methyl  Chloride.    Prepared  by  the  Office   of  Health  and  Environ-
    mental  Assessment,   Environmental  Criteria   and Assessment  Office,
    Cincinnati,   OH  for   the  Office   of  Solid  Waste and  Emergency
    Response, Washington, DC.

    The Intent 1n these  assessments  1s  to  suggest  acceptable exposure levels
for  noncardnogens  and   risk  cancer   potency  estimates   for  carcinogens
whenever sufficient  data  were  available.  Values were  not derived  or  larger
uncertainty  factors  were  employed when the  variable   data  were limited  1n
scope   tending   to   generate  conservative   (I.e.,  protective)  estimates.
Nevertheless, the  Interim  values  presented   reflect  the  relative  degree  of
hazard or risk associated with exposure to the chemlcal(s)  addressed.

    Whenever  possible,   two categories  of values  have been  estimated  for
systemic  toxicants   (toxicants for  which  cancer  1s   not   the  endpolnt  of
concern).  The  first,  RfD<; (formerly AIS) or subchronlc  reference dose,  1s
an estimate of an exposure  level  that  would  not be expected to cause  adverse
effects when  exposure  occurs  during  a  limited  time  Interval   (I.e.,  for  an
Interval  that does  not  constitute a  significant portion  of the Hfespan).
                                      111

-------
This  type  of  exposure estimate has  not  been  extensively used, or rigorously
defined,  as previous  risk assessment  efforts  have been  primarily  directed
towards  exposures  from  toxicants  In  ambient  air  or  water  where  lifetime
exposure   1s   assumed.    Animal   data   used  for  RFO$.  estimates  generally
Include  exposures  with durations  of  30-90  days.  Subchronlc  human  data  are
rarely  available.   Reported exposures are  usually  from chronic occupational
exposure  situations  or  from  reports  of acute accidental  exposure.   These
values   are  developed   for   both  Inhalation  (RfD$i)   and   oral   (RfD$g)
exposures.

    The  RfD  (formerly AIC)  Is  similar 1n  concept  and  addresses  chronic
exposure.   It  Is  an estimate  of  an exposure level  that would not be  expected
to cause  adverse effects  when  exposure  occurs  for a  significant  portion of
the Hfespan  [see U.S. EPA  (1980b)  for a  discussion  of this  concept].   The
RfO  Is  route-specific  and  estimates   acceptable  exposure  for either  oral
(RfDn,)  or  Inhalation  (RfDj)  with  the  Implicit   assumption   that  exposure
by other routes 1s  Insignificant.

    Composite  scores  (CSs)   for   noncardnogens  have   also  been  calculated
where  data permitted.   These  values  are  used  for   Identifying  reportable
quantities  and  the methodology  for  their  development  Is  explained   In  U.S.
EPA (1984).

    For compounds  for which there 1s sufficient evidence  of cardnogenlclty
RfD$  and  RfD  values  are  not derived.   For a discussion  of risk  assessment
methodology for  carcinogens refer  to  U.S.  EPA  (1980b).   Since cancer Is  a
process that  Is  not  characterized by  a threshold,  any  exposure  contributes
an Increment  of  risk.  For  carcinogens,  q-]*s have been computed, 1f  appro-
priate, based  on oral and  Inhalation data 1f available.
                                      1v

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
    In  order  to  place  the  risk  assessment  evaluation  In proper  context,.
refer  to  the preface  of  this  document.  The  preface outlines  limitations
applicable to all documents of  this  series as  well  as the appropriate Inter-
pretation and use of the quantitative estimates presented.

    Exposure to chloromethane vapor  has  been  shown  to Increase the Incidence
of  kidney  tumors  In male  B6C3F1 mice  (CUT,  1981;  NIOSH, 1984).   No  other
studies  regarding  the  carcinogenic  potential  of   chloromethane  by  other
routes  were  available.    Because  of  the lack  of  data,  U.S.  EPA  (1986a)
calculated  an  oral  q-j* from  the  Inhalation  data.   This value,  1.26xlO~2
(mg/kg/day)"1  Is   also  presented   In   this  document.    An  Inhalation  q-]*,
also  calculated from the  CUT  (1981)  study,  was determined to  be 6.23xlO~3
(mg/kg/day)"1.  Chloromethane  has  been  classified by  the U.S. EPA  (1986a)
as a Group C carcinogen.

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    The  Initial  draft  of  this  report  was  prepared  by Syracuse  Research
Corporation  under  Contract No.  68-03-3112 for  EPA's  Environmental  Criteria
and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.   Or.  Christopher  DeRosa and  Karen
Blackburn  were the  Technical  Project  Monitors  and John  Helms  (Office  of
Toxic  Substances)  was  the Project  Officer.   The  final  documents   In  this
series  were prepared  for  the  Office of  Emergency  and Remedial  Response,
Washington, DC.

    Scientists  from  the  following U.S. EPA  offices  provided  review  comments
for this document series:

         Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
         Office of A1r Quality Planning and Standards
         Office of Solid Waste
         Office of Toxic Substances
         Office of Drinking Water

Editorial review for the document series  was provided by the following:

    Judith Olsen and Erma Durden
    Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH

Technical  support  services  for  the  document  series  was  provided  by  the
following:

    Bette Zwayer,  Jacky Bohanon and K1m Davidson
    Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office
    Cincinnati, OH
                                      v1

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.
2.


3.










4.






5.
6.





7.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE 	
ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS . . .
2.1. ORAL 	
2.2. INHALATION 	
TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS 	
3.1. SUBCHRONIC 	 	 .
3.1.1. Oral 	 	 	
3.1.2. Inhalation 	
3.2. CHRONIC 	
3.2.1. Oral 	
3.2.2. Inhalation 	
3.3. TERATOGENICITY AND OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS. . . .
3.3.1. Oral. . 	
3.3.2. Inhalation 	
3.4. TOXICANT INTERACTIONS 	
CARCINOGENICITY 	 	 	 	 	
4.1. HUMAN DATA 	 	
4.2. BIOASSAYS 	
4.2.1. Oral 	 	
4.2.2. Inhalation 	
4.3. OTHER RELEVANT DATA 	 	
4.4. HEIGHT OF EVIDENCE 	
REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA 	
RISK ASSESSMENT 	
6.1. SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfDc) 	
6.2. REFERENCE DOSE (RfD) 	 	
6.3. CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q^) 	
6.3.1. Oral 	
6.3.2. Inhalation 	
REFERENCES 	
APPENDIX 	
Page
. . . 1
. . . 3
. . . 3
. . . 3
. . . 5
. . . 5
. . . 5
. . . 5
. . . 6
. . . 6
. . . 6
. . . 9
. . . 9
. . . 9
. . . 13
. . . 15
. . . 15
15
. . . 15
15
. . . 17
17
. . . 19
20
. . . 20
. . . 20
. , , 20
. . . 20
. . . 20
. . . 22
. . . 29
       V11

-------
                               LIST OF TABLES
No.                               Title                                Page
1-1     Selected Chemical and Physical Properties of Chloromethane. .     2
4-1     Numbers of Male Mice Sacrificed or Dying and Kidney Tumor
        Prevalence 1n Months 13-24	    16
4-2     Carcinogenic Potency of Chloromethane {99.99% pure) 1n Male
        B6C3F1 Mice Exposed by Inhalation 6 Hours/Day, 5 Days/Week. .    18
6-1     Derivation of a q-|* for Inhalation Exposure	    21

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
EEG                     Electroencephalogram
ppm                     Parts per million
RfO                     Reference dose
RfD$                    Subchronlc reference dose
SCE                     S1ster-chromat1d exchange
SGPT                    Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
STEL                    Short-term exposed level
TLV                     Threshold limit value
                                      1x

-------
                     1.  ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND FATE

    Selected  chemical  and  physical  properties  and  half-lives  of  chloro-
methane  (CAS No. 74-87-3) are presented 1n Table 1-1.
    The  sources  of atmospheric chloromethane are both  natural  and  anthropo-
genic.   Chloromethane  1s  always present 1n the atmosphere  at  low concentra-
tions,  depending upon  seasonal,  diurnal  and latitudinal  variations  (KhalU
and Rasmussen,  1983;  Singh  et  al.,  1982).  Reaction with  HO  radical  Is  the
most  significant process  for  removal  of chloromethane  from  the  troposphere
(Davis  et al.,  1982).   Based  on an estimated  atmospheric half-life  of  -1
year  (Davis et al., 1976)  and  the lifetime for  tropospherlc to stratospheric
transfer  of  30 years   (DllUng,  1982),  ~3X of tropospherlc  chloromethane  1s
expected  to  be transferred  to  the  stratosphere  where  1t may  participate  In
the  destruction  of  the ozone  layer  (Dining,  1982).  Volatilization  from
water  1s  expected  to  be  the dominant  removal mechanism for  aquatic  chloro-
methane.   Based  on  a  recommended  value   for  Henry.1 s   Law  constant   of
9.4xlO"3  atm-mVmol  at  25°C  (Mackay   and  Shu1, 1981), the  volatilization
half-life  from a depth  of  1 m  was  calculated  to  be 3.8 hours  by  the  method
of Lyman  et  al.  (1982).  Based on the  fate of chloromethane  In water,  1t  Is
speculated that  volatilization  1s the  most Important  removal  mechanism from
soil.    Because  of  Its  low soil  adsorption  coefficient and relatively  high
water  solubility,  leaching  of  chloromethane  from   soil  to groundwater may
occur from dumps Hes.
0070h                               -1-                              11/17/86

-------
                                   TABLE  1-1
          Selected Chemical and Physical  Properties of Chloromethane
        Property
        Value
      Reference
Chemical class:

Molecular weight:
Vapor pressure:
Water solubility:
Log octanol/water
  partition coefficient:
Bloconcentratlon factor:
Soil adsorption
  coefficient:
Half-lives In
  Air:
  Water:
chlorinated aliphatic
hydrocarbon
50.49
3.6xlOa mm Hg at 20°C
7.4xl03 mg/l at 20°C
0.91

3 (estimated)
25 (estimated)

-1 year (estimated)
-4 hours (estimated)
rapid flowing shallow
Mackay and Shul, 1981
Mackay and Shul, 1981
Hansch and Leo, 1985
Lyman et al., 1982
Lyman et al., 1982

Davis et al.. 1976
Lyman et al., 1982
0070h
       -2-
             11/17/86

-------
           2.  ABSORPTION FACTORS IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
2.1.   ORAL
    Pertinent  data  regarding  absorption  of  chloromethane  following  oral
administration could not be located 1n the available literature.
2.2.   INHALATION
    Putz-Anderson  et  al. (1981a) exposed  men and women  to chloromethane at
100  or  200  ppm  (207  or  413  mg/m3)  for  3 hours.  Breath  levels  of exposed
Individuals  reached  equilibrium during  the  first hour.   The  average breath
level  for  the eight 100  ppm-exposed  Individuals was  36*02 ppm (mean±S.D.).
In  the  twenty-four 200 ppm-exposed  subjects breath  concentrations  reached
63^23.6 ppm.  Breath levels were highly  correlated  with blood levels (r=0.85
or 0.91,  p<0.01)  that  reached 7.7^6.3 ppm and 11.5*12.3 ppm In the low- and
high-exposure groups,  respectively.  Rate  of absorption  or  percent absorp-
tion were not estimated In this  study.
    Nolan et al.  (1985)  also  exposed  six male volunteers to 10 or 50 ppm (21
or 103  mg/m3)  chloromethane  for 6  hours.   Blood and  expired  air  concentra-
tions  of  chloromethane  reached equilibrium  during  the  first  hour.   The
expired  air  was  found  to  contain 30-70% of  the  concentration of  chloro-
methane  In  Inhaled  air.   Absorption  rates  of  1.4-3.7  pg/m1nute/kg  were
calculated using a two-compartment  pharmacoklnetlc model.
    In a  study  by Morgan et  al. (1970), volunteers Inhaled a  known concen-
tration of  38Cl-labeled  chloromethane  1n a  single breath.   The amount  of
radioactivity expired In  two  breaths  following breath-holding  for  20 seconds
was determined  to be  22% of  the  Inhaled dose.   After  1  hour,  29% of  the
administered radioactivity was  recovered 1n  expired air.   Therefore,  71-78%
of the 38C1-chloromethane had  been  retained and potentially absorbed.
0070h                               -3-                              11/17/86

-------
    landfy  et  al.  (1983)  exposed groups  of six  male Fischer  344 rats  to
chToromethane  vapor  at  50 or  1000 ppm  (103 or  2065 mg/m3)  for 6  hours.
Vapor uptake was  measured  at  1.5 and 2 hours of exposure.   At  both sampling
times the  uptake  was 10 yg/m1nute/kg for  the 50 ppm exposure  level and  165
yg/mlnute/kg for  the 1000  ppm exposure  level.   After 6 hours,  the absorbed
dose, calculated  using  a  two-compartment model,  was determined  to be  3.8
mg/kg for  the  50  ppm  concentration and  67  mg/kg  for  the 1000  ppm concen-
tration.
    Jn  an  additional experiment, Landry et  al.  (1983) exposed  male Fischer
344 rats for 6 hours and male  beagle dogs  for 3  hours to  chloromethane vapor
at 50 or  1000 ppm  (103  or 2065 mg/m3).   Chloromethane  levels   In  the  blood
rose rapidly, reached a  plateau  and were  proportional  to  exposure concentra-
tions.  Blood:gas concentration  ratios  were  1.5  and 1.8 for  dogs  exposed to
50 or 1000 ppm,  respectively, and  1.8  and 1.9  for  rats  at 50  or  1000  ppm,
respectively.
0070h                               -4-                              11/17/86

-------
                3.  TOXICITY IN HUMANS AND EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
3.1.    SUBCHRONIC
3.1.1.   Oral.    Pertinent  data  regarding  subchronlc  effects  of  chloro-
methane following oral  administration could not  be  located  In the available
literature.
3.1.2.   Inhalation.   In a  study by  Evtushenko  (1966),  groups  of  10 rats
and  4  rabbits  were exposed  to  either 40  or  240 mg/m3  chloromethane  vapor
for  4  hours/day  for   up  to  6   months.   Decreased  erythrocyte  counts  and
depletion  of  lymphold elements  1n the spleen and lymph were observed In rats
at  both exposure  levels.  Disturbed excretory  function  of  the  liver  was
observed   1n  both  rats and  rabbits  at  240  mg/m3.   Discoloration  of  the
optic  disc  and  hlstologlcal  lesions of  the  retina and  optic  nerve were
observed 1n rabbits at  both exposure  levels.
    Mitchell  et al. (1979) exposed  groups  of 10 male and  10  female  Fischer
344 rats  (6 weeks old)  and 10 male  and  10 female B6C3F1 mice (6 weeks old)
to  chloromethane  vapor  at  375,  750  or  1500 ppm  (774,  1549  or  3098 mg/m3)
for 6  hours/day,  5  days/week for 13  weeks.   Equal   numbers of control rats
and mice  were  observed  for  food  consumption,  body  weight  gain,  clinical
signs  and  mortality.   At  the end  of the  exposure  period,  blood  and  urine
samples  were  taken for  analysis, ophthalmic  examinations  were made  and  the
rats  and mice  were sacrificed.   Treatment-related  effects  observed 1n  the
high-dose  groups  were  as follows:  significantly  Increased  SGPT  activity  1n
male  mice. Increased  relative  liver  weights  In  male and  female mice  and
female  rats,  hepatic  Infarctions In  one  male mouse and one female rat,  and
Increased  severity  and  Incidence  of  cytoplasmlc  vacuollzatlon  of  hepatocytes
1n  male mice.   Significantly reduced body  weight  gain  In  male and  female
rats  1n the  750  and  1500 ppm  dose  groups  was  the only  other  treatment-
related effect observed.

0070h                                -5-                              11/17/86

-------
3.2.   CHRONIC
3.2.1.   Oral.   Pertinent  data  regarding  chronic effects  of chloromethane
following  oral  administration  could  not   be   located   In   the  available
literature.
3.2.2.   Inhalation.  Repko and  Losley  (1979) reviewed the toxic  effects  of
chloromethane exposure  In  humans.   Without providing  dose  Information,  they
stated  that   long-term  exposure  to  low  levels  of  chloromethane  tends  to
result  In  signs and  symptoms  confined  almost  exclusively  to the  CNS.   The
signs  and  symptoms  observed  Include   headaches,   drowsiness,   staggering,
muscle weakness, slurred speech, confusion and Impaired judgement.
    Repko  et  al.  (1976) conducted  an epidemiology  study  that evaluated  the
behavioral and  neurological  effects  of  chloromethane  1n humans  occupation-
ally exposed  to  the compound  for 1-311 months.   Data from 122 exposed and 49
control workers  (age  18-61)  from  several  locations  were analyzed.   Ambient
air  concentrations  were  measured  at 1.8-70  ppm  (3.7-145 mg/m3)  with  an
average  concentration  of  33.57   ppm  (69.32   mg/m3).   Breath   levels   of
chloromethane,  which  ranged  from  10.81-24.19  ppm (22.32-49.95 mg/m3),  were
significantly correlated with  ambient air levels (p<0.005).   No  significant
differences were observed  In  the results  of  neurological  examination  or  EEG
activity.   Behavioral  tests   showed  that  exposed workers  had Impaired  per-
formances   on  time-sharing  tasks and  Increased  magnitudes of  finger  tremors
compared with controls.   These changes  correlated with chloromethane levels
1n ambient air  and  with urine pH,  but no  relationship between chloromethane
In breath and performance was  observed.
    In  a  study  by  CUT (1981), summarized  by NIOSH  (1984),  groups  of  120
male and K'O  female Fischer 344  rats  and  120  male and  120 female  B6C3F1  mice
were exposed  to chloromethane vapor at  0, 50,  225  or  1000 ppm (0,  103,  465


0070h                               -6-                               08/06/86

-------
 or  2065 mg/m3)  for  6 hours/day, 5  days/week  for up to  24  months.  Interim
 sacrifices  were performed  at 6, 12,  18  and 24  months  of  exposure.  During
 the  study,  rats and mice were observed or evaluated for clinical signs, body
 weight  gain and mortality.   Just before sacrifice, ophthalmologlcal examina-
 tions were  made, hematologlcal,  clinical  chemistry and urlnalysls parameters
 were  determined, and  examinations   for  gross  and  hlstopathologlcal  lesions
 were made;  neurofunctlon was  also examined at  18-24 months.   Male and female
 mice  had  Increased  mortality  at 1000  ppm, while  rats  were  not  affected.
 Hale mice  at 1000  ppm showed a  significant (p  value  not provided) decrease
 1n  growth  rate  through  the first 18 months of  the  study.   The growth rates
 of  both male  and  female rats  at 1000 ppm were  significantly  depressed  (p
 value not  provided) throughout  the  study.  At  18,  21  and  22  months,  neuro-
 functlonal  Impairment  was  observed  1n  most male  and female mice exposed  to
 1000 ppm.   The  Impairment  observed  consisted  of  a  positive clutch response
 at  18 months and a weakened  extensor  thrust/scratch  response.   At  6,  12 and
 18  months,  male mice  at  1000 ppm showed  significantly  elevated  SGPT  levels
 that were  associated  with  hepatocellular  degeneration  and  necrosis.   At  6
 and  12  months,  female  mice  at all  exposure  levels  showed  significant
 Increases  1n SGPT.   These  Increases were not observed  at  18   or  24 months,
 and were not associated  with  liver  lesions.  Although  there  were a number  of
 relative organ  weight changes In both  rats and mice,  they were  not consis-
 tently related  to dose and  were bi-directional.
    The  hlstopathologlcal  data  (CUT,  1981; NIOSH,  1984) showed  a  signifi-
 cant Increase  In the  Incidence of hepatic  lesions (multlfocal  centrllobular
 hepatocellular  necrosis,  karyomegaly,  cytomegaly  and  vacuolar  degradation)
 In male  and female mice  at 1000 ppm as compared  with  controls (p<0.0001).
0070h                               -7-                              11/17/86

-------
The  kidneys of  male mice  exposed  to  1000  ppm had  significantly  Increased
Incidences  of  hyperplasla  and  karyomegaly  of renal  tubule  epithelial  cells
compared  with  controls  (p<0.0001).   The  kidney lesions were  first observed
at  12  months   and   became  more  severe as  exposure  continued.    Hale  mice
exposed to  1000  ppm  also had significantly  Increased Incidences  of  degenera-
tion  and  atrophy  of  seminiferous   tubules   (p=0.001)  and  of  the  spleen
(p<0.0001).   The Incidence of  degeneration  and atrophy  of  the  cerebellar
granular  layer  was   also Increased  In  1000  ppm exposed male  (p<0.0001)  and
female  (p<0.05)  mice compared with controls.   An  Increase  1n  the  Incidence
of atrophy  and  degeneration of  the  seminiferous  tubules  of male  rats exposed
to 1000 ppm chloromethane  was  the only  treatment-related hlstopathologlcal
lesion  observed  In rats.
    A  series of reports  describe studies   In  which  several  species  were
exposed to  chloromethane vapor 6 hours/day,  6 days/week for up to 64  weeks
(Smith  and  von  Oettlngen,  1947a,b;   Smith,  1947;   Dunn  and  Smith,  1947).
Exposure  levels  varied  from as  high   as  4000 ppm  (8260 mg/m3)  to  a low of
300  ppm  (620   mg/m3).   Deaths  In all  species  occurred  1n  1-37 days  at
concentrations  >1000 ppm  (Smith  and  von Oettlngen,  1947a).   Rats  were  the
only  species that  had   no  mortality  In  211  days  at  500  ppm (1033  mg/m3).
Toxic effects observed   In  dogs  exposed  to  500 ppm  for  up to 29 weeks  were
ataxlc, and had  severely   Impaired gait  and  tremors.   At 500 ppm,  monkeys
became  emaciated and prostrate before  death  at  16-17 weeks.  Mice,  rabbits
and  rats   also   experienced neuromuscular  effects   that  often  resulted  1n
Inability  to use  the  hind legs.  No toxic  effects were  observed In  any
species exposed  to  300  ppm for  64  weeks.  The hlstopathologlcal changes In
animals exposed  to  -1000 ppm for 6 hours/day, 6 days/week until death,  were
variable  degrees of  necrosis  of the  convoluted tubules  of the kidneys In


0070h                               -8-                              11/17/86

-------
mice  and  rats,  renal  changes  associated  with  hemogloblnurla  In  mice  and
occasionally  In  dogs,  and a low to moderate amount of fatty metamorphosis of
the  liver  and kidneys  of  mice,  rats,  rabbits  and  guinea  pigs  (Dunn  and
Smith,  1947).
3.3.    TERATOGENICITY  AND OTHER  REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
3.3.1.    Oral.    Pertinent  data  regarding   teratogenlc   and   reproductive
effects  of chloromethane  following oral  administration  could  not  be located
In the  available literature.
3.3.2.    Inhalation.   In  a study by Holkowsk1-Tyl et  al.  (1983a),  groups of
74-77  female  C57BL/6 mice  that  were  mated to C3H male  mice  were  exposed to
chloromethane  at  0,  250,   500  or 750  ppm (0,  516, 1033  or  1544  mg/m3)  for  6
hours/day  on  gestation days 6-18.   On  gestation day 18,  dams  were killed.
Dams exposed  to  750  ppm had decreased body weights,  tremors,  convulsions  and
ataxla,  and  were  hypersensitive  to  touch  or sound.   During  the  exposure
period,  six mice died  and one was  killed In extremis  In the 750 ppm exposure
group.   The  fetuses  of both  the  750 and  500 ppm groups  had  significantly
(p<0.05)  Increased Incidences of  heart defects compared with  controls.   No
effects were observed  1n  the 250 ppm exposed group.
    In  a  similar  study  by Wolkowsk1-Tyl  et  al. (1983b),  groups  of  25-33
pregnant  Fischer   344  rats  and  C57BL/6 mice  were  exposed to  chloromethane
vapor  at  0,   100,  500 or  1500  ppm  (0,  207,  1033  or 3098  mg/m3)   for  6
hours/day  on   gestation  days  7-19  (rats)  and gestation  days   6-17  (mice).
Rats and mice were  sacrificed  Just  before parturition and  the  numbers  of
live and  resorbed  fetuses  were  determined.   Fetuses  were  then  examined  for
abnormalities.   In rats,  maternal  food  consumption, body  weight  gain  and
terminal  body  weight  were  reduced at  the high concentration.   Fetal  toxlc-
Hy, manifested  as  statistically  significantly  reduced fetal   body  weights


0070h                               -9-                              11/17/86

-------
(both  sexes)  and  reduced  fetal  crown-rump  length  (females only),  was  also
noted  at  the high  concentration.   No  chloromethane-lnduced  abnormalities
were observed  In  rat fetuses.  In mice, 1500  ppm  chloromethane was severely
toxic  to dams after  >4 days of  exposure.   Mice 1n the  high-exposure group
were  killed  In  extremis  on gestation  days  10-14.   Necropsy  of  the  dams
showed necrosis of neurons  In the  Internal  granular  layer of the cerebellum.
No maternal toxldty  or  fetotoxldty  was observed  In mice at the other expo-
sure levels.   Fetuses from  the  500  ppm  exposed dams  showed  a  statistically
significant (p<0.05)  Increase 1n  the  number  of heart  defects.   At  100  ppm,
no embryofetal toxlclty or teratogenlclty was observed  1n mice.
    Chloromethane has been  shown  to cause  reproductive effects  1n male rats.
In a study  by Morgan et al.  (1982),  groups of  10 male Fischer  344 rats  were
exposed  to 0,  2000,  3500  or  5000  ppm  (0,  4130, 7228  or   10,325  mg/m3)
methyl  chloride  vapor,  6 hours/day for  5  days,  to filtered air  for  2 days,
and  then to  chloromethane  for  4  more days.  After the  last  exposure,  the
rats were killed.  Hlstologlcal examination  showed that all  rats  at the  2000
and 3500 ppm  exposure levels had  minimal  testlcular  degeneration,  while  at
5000 ppm all  rats  had  severe testlcular  degeneration.  No testlcular lesions
were observed In control rats.
    In  a study by Chapln  et al.  (1984),  adult male  Fischer   344  rats  were
exposed  to  3500  ppm  (7228  mg/m3)  chloromethane,  6 hours/day for  5  days,  to
filtered air  for  3 days, and then to  chloromethane, 6 hours/day  for another
4 days.  Control rats were  exposed  to filtered  air.  On  postexposure days  5,
7, 9,  11,  13,  15,  19 and 70, groups  of six or  eight treated  and  two control
rats were  killed.   On  day  9,  h1stopatholog1cal  examination  of   the  testls
showed   a delay  In  spermlatlon.   On  days  13-19,  all  treated  rats  showed
varying  degrees  of  disruption  and   disorganization  of  the   seminiferous
epithelium, which  became more  advanced  as  time  from  treatment  Increased.

0070h                               -10-                              11/17/86

-------
 Granulomas  of the epldldymls were  observed  on  day 19.  Most (70-90%) of the
 seminiferous   tubules   of  rats  sacrificed  on  day  70  postexposure  were
 shrunken,  and the remaining  tubules  showed  varying degrees  of spermatogene-
 sls  recovery.  Chapln  et al.  (1984)  also examined  testosterone  levels and
 found   that  serum  testosterone   concentrations   showed  a  time-dependent
 decrease  during  the  five consecutive  chloromethane  exposures  (6 hours/day
 for  5 days).
     In  a  dominant lethal assay, Working  et  al.  (1985a)  exposed groups of 40
 male Fischer  344  rats  to chloromethane vapor at 0, 1000 or 3000 ppm  (0, 2065
 or  6195 mg/m3), 6 hours/day  for  5  days.   Each treated male was  bred to one
 female  weekly for 8 weeks.   Female  rats  were  killed 12-17 days after mating
 and  data  for  dominant  lethal  effects were gathered.  The results showed that
 reproductive  performance and  fertility of male rats  exposed  to 1000 ppm did
 not  vary  significantly  from controls.   At  week  2,  mating performance was
 depressed and at  weeks  2 and 3 postexposure  there were  significantly fewer
 fertile males In  the 3000 ppm  treatment  group.   Though  not  significant, the
 percentage  of  fertile  males  1n   the  3000  ppm  group   remained  less  than
 controls  throughout   the  breeding  period.   A   significant   Increase  1n
 prelmplantatlon  loss  at  week 3  postexposure  was  the only dominant lethal
 parameter that  differed  from control  values.   The number of  live and total
 Implants  from  the  3000  ppm  exposure  group  was  decreased  throughout  the
 8-week  breeding  period.   Most of  the decrease  was  a  result of  Increased
 prelmplantatlon loss.   This  loss  was  significant  at  weeks 2,  3,  4,  6 and  8
 postexposure.   Significantly  Increased postlmplantatlon  loss   occurred  only
at 1 week  postexposure.   From these results, the  authors  concluded  that the
postlmplantatlon  losses  may  have  been   related  to  chloromethane-lnduced
0070h                               -11-                             11/17/86

-------
dominant lethal mutations  In  sperm  1n  the  vas  deferens  and epldldymls at the
time of  exposure, while  the pre1mplantat1on  losses  may  have been- a result of
cytotoxlc effects as well as genotoxlc effects.
    In a second study  by Working  et al.  (1985b),  groups of 80 male rats were
exposed  to chloromethane  vapor  at  0,  1000  or 3000  ppm  (0,  2065  or  2195
mg/m3},  6  hours/day  for  5  days.   Five rats  from each  group were  killed
every week  for  8 weeks  and at  16 weeks postexposure.   Rats  exposed  to 3000
ppm had  sperm  granulomas 1n the  caudal  epldldymls  (15/39),  which  were first
observed 16  days  after  the start of chloromethane exposure.   Testes  of the
1000 ppm exposed group exhibited  normal  morphology.  In the 3000 ppm exposed
group,  testes  showed  evidence  of  disruption  of  spermatogenesls.   Signs  of
toxldty were  still  evident  8  weeks postexposure, but  at  16 weeks  post-
exposure most  of  the  seminiferous  tubules  (50-90%) appeared  normal.   Sperm
counts  from  the  3000  ppm exposure  group  were significantly decreased  by  1
week postexposure, and there  was  an Increased number of  sperm with abnormal
head morphology.  By the third week following exposure,  sperm  motHlty was
depressed and  there  was  an Increase In  the  frequency of  headless  sperm.  By
week 16  (except  for sperm  count  which remained low),   other  parameters were
near normal.  No effects  on sperm were noted 1n the rats exposed to 1000 ppm.
    Hamm  et  al.   (1985)  conducted a   2-generat1on  reproductive  study  In
Fischer  rats  exposed  to  chloromethane  vapor.   Groups  of  40  male  and  80
female rats were  exposed to  chloromethane  vapor at  0,  150, 475 or 1500 ppm
(0, 310,  981, 3098  mg/m3),  6  hours/day,  5 days/week   for  10  weeks.   After
10 weeks,  each male was  mated  to two exposed  females  and the  exposure was
changed  to  6 hours/day,   7  days/week.    After  a  2-week  mating  period,  males
were  removed  from   exposure  and  matt! for  an  additional  2  weeks  with
0070h                               -12-                             11/17/86

-------
unexposed  females.   Females  1n  treated  groups  were not  exposed  from gesta-
tion  day 18  to  postnatal  day  4.   For  10  weeks,  members of  the  F.  genera-
tion  were  exposed to  the same chloromethane concentration  as  their  parents
(0, 150  and 475 ppm) and  were then mated.
    Results  showed  a  significant  decrease  In  body weight gains  In the 1500
ppm  Fn  males and  females  after  2  weeks, and  1n  the 475  ppm  males  and
females  after 57  days.   No  Utters were produced  from males exposed  to 1500
ppm with either exposed  or unexposed  females.   Exposed and  unexposed  females
mated  to 475 ppm males  produced significantly fewer  Utters  than controls.
No  effects  on  Utter  size,  sex  ratio,  pup viability,  pup  survival  or  pup
growth were  noted 1n  the 475  and  100 ppm groups.  Results  of  the F.  breed-
Ings  were  not significantly different from  controls,  either biologically or
statistically,  although  a  trend  toward  decreased  fertility  was noted  at
475 ppm.
3.4.   TOXICANT INTERACTIONS
    Putz-Anderson  et  al.  (1981a)  studied  the  effects of chloromethane  and
dlazepam on  CNS performance  In  humans.   Volunteers  were exposed  to  chloro-
methane  at  200 ppm  (413  mg/m3)  for   3 hours,  were given 10 mg dlazepam,  or
received  both  treatments.   Performance  was   then  measured   In  a  visual-
vigilance task, a dual task and  a  time discrimination  task.   Dlazepam caused
a  10%  average  decrease  In  overall performance;  chloromethane  caused  a
decrease of  4X.   Combined,  the  two  treatments  caused an average  decline of
13.5%  Indicating   that  the effects  of  methyl  chloride  and  dlazepam  are
additive.
    Putz-Anderson et  al.  (1981b)  also studied  the effects  of  chloromethane
with  caffeine  and   ethanol  on  humans.    Male  and  female  volunteers  were
exposed  to  methyl chloride  at  0  or  200 ppm  (413 mg/m3)  for   3  hours  along


0070h                               -13-                            ; 08/06/86

-------
with a  drug treatment of  ethanol  (0.8 ml/kg absolute  ethanol),  caffeine (3
mg/kg)  or  a  placebo.   Performance  tests  used  were  the  same  as  In  the
previous  study.   The results showed  that  chloromethane exposure  at  200  ppm
did not significantly change the effects of ethanol  or caffeine.
0070h                               -14-                             08/06/86

-------
                              4.  CARCIMOGENICITY
4.1.   HUMAN DATA
    Pertinent  data  regarding the  potential  carclnogenlclty of chloromethane
In  humans  by  oral   or   Inhalation  exposure  could not  be  located   1n  the
available literature.
4.2.   BIOASSAYS
4.2.1.   Oral.   Pertinent data  regarding the  potential  carclnogenlclty  of
chloromethane  1n animals  following oral  exposure could not  be located 1n the
available literature.
4.2.2.   Inhalation.   A  2-year  Inhalation  study In mice  and rats was  con-
ducted  (CUT,  1981),  1n  which groups of  120  male and  120  female B6C3F1  mice
and equal  numbers of  male and  female  Fischer  rats were exposed  to  chloro-
methane  vapor  at 0,  50,  225 or 1000 ppm (0, 103,  465 or  2065  mg/m3)  for 6
hours/day, 5 days/week.   At  6,  12, 18 and 24 months, 5-20 rats and mice/sex/
group  were  killed.   High mortality  was  observed  In  mice  1n  the 1000  ppm
group  so that  only  two  survived  until  21  months,  at which time  they  were
sacrificed.  Comprehensive  hlstologlcal  examinations of  all control and  1000
ppm mice and rats were made.   Hlstologlcal  examination of  the 50 and 225 ppm
groups were limited to testes,  epidldymis,  kidneys, liver  and lungs for  rats
and liver, kidneys, spleen and brain for mice.
    Although survival  appeared  to  be  reduced  In 1000 ppm mice of both sexes,
a statistically significant Increase In mortality  occurred  only  1n females.
A significant  Increase 1n  the  Incidence  of  renal tumors  was observed  In  male
mice.   Table  4-1 shows  the numbers  of  male mice  killed  or dying,  and  the
Incidence of renal  tumors  In each month  from the 12th month (when  the first
kidney  tumor  was found).   Tumor types  found  were  renal cortical  adenomas,
renal  cortical  adenocardnomas,  papillary cystadenomas,  tubular  cystadenomas

0070h                                -15-                             08/06/86

-------
                                  TABLE 4-1

           Numbers  of  Male  Mice  Sacrificed or Dying and Kidney Tumor
                         Prevalence  1n Months 13-24a»b
Month
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
TOTAL
Control
12
1
3
0
2
1
6
3
6
3
4
26
67
50 ppm
10
0
0
0
0
0
5
4
5
0
1
36
61
225 ppm
10
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
1
3
0
36 (2A)
57
1000 ppm
11 (1A)
3
4
2
3 (1A, 1C)
3
11 (3A)
17 (4A)
24 (4A, 4C)
3
0
1
82
aSource: CUT, 1981; NIOSH, 1984

^Parentheses  Indicate  numbers  of  mice  with  kidney  tumors,  classified  as
 adenomas (A) or carcinomas (C)
0070h
-16-
08/06/86

-------
 and  papillary  cystadenocarclnomas.   The  Incidences  of  kidney  tumors,  as
 Indicated  on Table 4-1,  were 0/67 controls, 0/61  1n  the  50 ppm group, 2/57
 In  the 225 ppm group  and  18/82 1n the 1000 ppm group.  The above Incidences
 do  not account for  kidney tumors  that  may have developed  If  the mice that
 were  sacrificed  at Interim kills  or  died during the experiment had lived to
 24  months.   To correct  for  Intercurrent mortality, the method described by
 Peto  et  al.  (1980) was applied.   The "corrected"  Incidences of renal tumors
 1n  male  mice are  presented  In Table  4-2.   No  evidence  of  treatment-related
 oncogenldty was observed  In  female mice  or male or  female rats.
 4.3.   OTHER RELEVANT  DATA
    Chloromethane  has  been  shown  to be  positive  for  reverse mutation  1n
 Salmonella  typhlmurlum  strains  TA1535   (Andrews  et  al.,  1976)  and  TA100
 (Simmon  et  al.,  1977;  Simmon,  1978,  1981) both  1n  the  presence and absence
 of S-9 metabolic  activation.   Chloromethane has also  been  found to be posi-
 tive  for  forward  mutations  In £.  typhlmurlum  TA677  and  human lymphoblasts
 and  for  SCE 1n  human  lymphoblasts without metabolic  activation  (Fostel  et
 al., 1985).  In a  dominant  lethal study, Working et al.  (1985a,b)  found that
 Chloromethane  Induced  dominant lethal mutations  In mature  sperm  of Fischer
 344 rats exposed to 3000 ppm  (6195 mg/m3), 6 hours/day for  5 days.
 4.4.   HEIGHT OF EVIDENCE
    The  Increased  Incidence  of kidney tumors  In male mice,  as  supported  by
 the  positive  mutagenlclty data,   constitutes  limited animal   evidence  for
 carc1nogen1c1ty and  as  such  means that Chloromethane would  fall  within  a
U.S.  EPA Group  C  classification, "possible"  human  carcinogen  (U.S.  EPA,
 19865).
0070h                    .     .      -17-                             07/30/87

-------








OJ
u



^™
~?
J?
/"^
03
OJ*S
'"** ™j*
^2 r\
^L GJ
C ^x
«— i/i
m*
CD *"" **
l_
3 in
Q.
X >»
on ^3
cn o
*  C
P ^
0 r-
' ^
C_> C

o >>
u -o
c cu
CD t/i
*• 0
O Q.
Q. X
U
c
CD
O
"
U
ns
*•»
















0>
u
L. C
O O)
E "0

h** W
c





0)
a.
^^
t—
L.
g
3
H-






^j
^ C
u O>
1— O



C >>— -
O ^3 i/^
**•" 3 ^Z
•«-> *J jJ
->
C
C O)
_o e
t-t fO

3 H-






_ -^
m
E
•x

1/1 £
O •*-»
a
E

a.


r- • r— r~
• ^ v^ m
•x -x v.
O O CM






•


m
C £
a, o
•o c
o
r^ l^
(^ T3
O ^
O)
c
•o
Z Z ^





CM CM CM






I/I I/I I/I
555
c c c
o o o
E E E

CM CM CM
o o o
'*''**'**
a. a. a.
333





<^«« ^**
co m
^ » CO ^D
O i— «f


o o >n
in CM










re >>
E ^
O "3
c i— 2
cu i- E
•o — o
T3 Q. C
^^ IQ <^
wi a. u
>> L.
O ^3 *O
C U
>. 03 O
L. C
(^ LB CL)
^^ ^3 ^3
r- r— fO
•- 3 •<-•
Om ^ I/I
fD 3 >>
CL ••* o












































u
p^
00
^^
CM
CM

l/l
2 >>
E i-
O T3
C i— ITJ
• CU P™- £
§•0 — o
TJ a. e
m ^rf <^ •*»
CU 0 >• W
. T3 O
(—!_(- C
*J ft] rfy 1— fy
OO^*O T3
*- O (— r— f^
t-> C •<- 3 *-•
^ cu QL J3 vi
O T3 <« 3 >«
O 03 d •*-* O



>^
c
•o
^





CM








-
"fl3 2
CU •»
•o c
VI
O i—
E «M




tff^
in
vO
o
CM
*n*r

0
o
o
r-








o
00

f~"
•*_*

4
^~
"
cu

0

CU
a.
a.
P
P
4->
E
CD

^^
^3

£
ns
^
E
^_,
c
cu
i_
3
j*
*p
^
C

P
u-
•o
CU
^^
3
•o
i— rg
CO
cn i/i
i— CU
u
• c
<-* -a

U 0
c
•• *^~
CU
U L.
t- P
3 E
P 3
00 H-
,
^1

CO
u


















































CD
r—
.a
rQ
U
a.
a.
eQ

*-*
P
3£

II

<
Z
0070h
-18-
08/06/86

-------
                     5.  REGULATORY STANDARDS AND CRITERIA

     The  ambient water  quality  criterion for chloromethane  1s  19  mg/i (U.S.
 EPA,  1982).   This  level  Is  based on  an  RfD  of 0.54 mg/kg/day,  which  was
 calculated  from a  TLV  of 50 ppm  (105  mg/m3) (U.S. EPA,  1980a).   The AC6IH
 (1985,  1986)  TLV  of 50  ppm Is  based  on  human  exposure data  that  show no
 Irreversible  systemic  effects at 100-200 ppm, and  the  observations of Repko
 et  al.  (1976)  that neurotoxlc  effects may  occur  at  lower  exposures.   The
 STEL  adopted  by  ACGIH  (1985)   1s  100  ppm (205 mg/m3)  for  15 minutes.   A
 permissible exposure limit for chloromethane  Is not listed by OSHA  (1985).
0070h                               -19-                             11/17/86

-------
                              6.   RISK ASSESSMENT
6.1.   SUBCHRONIC REFERENCE DOSE (RfDc)
                                     *>
    Since chloromethane  has  been shown  to  be a carcinogen 1n male  mice,  an
RfDc will not be determined.
   w
6.2.   REFERENCE DOSE (RfD)
    Since chloromethane  has  been shown  to  be a carcinogen In male  mice,  an
RfD will not be determined.
6.3.   CARCINOGENIC POTENCY (q-,*)
6.3.1.   Oral.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  carcinogenic   potential   of
chloromethane  following  oral  administration  could  not  be located 1n  the
available  literature.    Because  of  the  lack  of  oral  data,  the  U.S.  EPA
(1986a)  calculated  an  oral   q  *  from  the  Inhalation  data   (see  Section
6.3.2.)  by  applying an  absorption  factor  of  0.5.  The  resultant  value  of
1.26xlO~2 (mg/kg/day)"1 was obtained.
6.3.2.   Inhalation.   An  Inhalation  q *  was  calculated  using  the multi-
stage model  of  Howe and Crump (1982)  from  the  CUT  (1981)  study  that showed
an  Increase  1n kidney  tumors  from male mice.   A statistically  significant
Increase 1n  the Incidence  of benign  and  malignant  kidney  tumors was  observed
1n  the   high-dose  male  mice  compared with  controls  (see  Section  4.2.2.).
Because  the  CUT  (1981) study used  Interim kills, the Incidences of kidney
tumors were  corrected  for  Intercurrent  mortality by  the  method  of  Peto  et
al.  (1980).   The  q *  was calculated  using  the  multistage model  developed
by  Howe  and Crump  (1982).  The data  used to  calculate  the  Inhalation  q,*
are   presented   1n   Table    6-1.     The   unadjusted   q *   1s    4.77xlO~*
(mgVkg/day)"1 while the human q,* Is  6.32xlO~3 (mg/kg/day)"1.
0070h                               -20-                             06/16/87

-------
                                   TABLE 6-1

                  Derivation of a q-j* for Inhalation Exposure


Compound:  Chloromethane

Reference:  NIOSH, 1984; CUT,  1981

Specles/straln/sex:  mouse, B6C3F1, male

Route/vehicle:   Inhalation, air

le = 24 months

LE = 24 months

L = 24 months

bw = 0.03 kg  (measured)

Tumor type and site:  kidney adenoma or carcinoma
 Experimental Doses
    or Exposues
(mg/m3, 6 hours/day,
    5 days/week)
Transformed Dose
   (mg/kg/day)
        Incidence
No. Responding/No.  Examined
0
103
656
2065
0
24
152
480
0/67
0/61
2/57
22/82
Unadjusted q-|* from study = 4.7678305x10'* (mg/kg/day)'1

Human q-]* = 6.3238234xlO~3 (mg/kg/day)'1
0070h
          -21-
                   02/18/87

-------
                                7.  REFERENCES







ACGIH  (American Conference  of Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).   1985.



TLVs:  Threshold Limit Values  for  Chemical Substances  1n the  Work  Environ-



ment.   Adopted  by  ACGIH  with  Intended  changes for  1985-1986.   Cincinnati,



OH.  p. 23.







ACGIH  (American Conference  of Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).   1986.



Documentation of the  Threshold Limit  Values for Substances  In  Workroom A1r.



4th ed. with supplements through 1984.  Cincinnati, OH.   p. 268-269.







Andrews, A.W.,  E.S.  Zawlstowskl  and C.R. Valentine.  1976.   A  comparison of



the mutagenlc properties of  vinyl  chloride  and  methyl  chloride.   Mutat. Res.



40: 273-276.







Chapln,  R.E.,   R.O.  White,  K.T.   Morgan  and  J.S.  Bus.   1984.   Studies  of



lesions Induced In  the testls  and  epldldymls of F-344 rats by Inhaled methyl



chloride.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.  76(2): 328-343.







CUT  (Chemical  Industry Institute of Toxicology).   1981.  Final report  on



24-month Inhalation study  on methyl chloride.   Prepared by Battelle-Columbus



Laboratories, Columbus, OH.  December  31.







Davis,  D.D.,  G.   Machado,   B.  Conaway,  Y.  Oh and  R.   Watson.   1976.   A



temperature  dependent kinetics  study  of   the  reaction  of   OH  with  CH-CL,



CH.CL2, CHCL3 and CHgBR.   J. Chem.  Phys.   65:  1268-1274.
0070H                               -22-                             02/18/87

-------
 Davis,  D.D., W.L.  Chamelders  and C.S. K1ang.   1982.   Measuring atmospheric
 gases and aerosols.  Nature.  295: 186.

 Dining,  W.L.   1982.   Atmospheric  environment.   In:  Environmental  Risk
 Analysis  for Chemicals,  R.A.  Conway,  Ed.   Van  Nostrand Relnhold  Co.,  New
 York, NY.  p. 154-197.

 Dunn,  R.C.   and  W.W.  Smith.   1947.   Acute and  chronic  toxlclty  of  methyl
 chloride.  IV. Hlstopathologlc observations.  Arch. Pathol.  43: 296-300.

 Evtushenko,  G.Y.   1966.   No title provided.  Gig.  Tr.  Prof.  Zabol.  10:  20.
 (Russian with English translation)  (Cited  1n U.S. EPA, 1980a)

 Fostel,  J.,  P.P.  Allen,  E. Bermudez,  A.D.  Kllgermon, J.L. WHmer  and  T.R.
 Skopek.   1985.   Assessment  of  the  genotoxlc  effects  of methylchloMde  1n
 human lymphoblasts.  Mutat. Res.  155(1-2): 75-82.

 Hamm, I.E.,  Jr.,  T.H.  Raynor,  M.C.  Phelps,  et al.   1985.   Reproduction  In
 F-344  rats  exposed  1n  methyl  chloride by  Inhalation  for two  generations.
 Fund. Appl.  Toxlcol.  5(3): 568-577.

 Hansch,  C.   and  A.J.  Leo.  1985.   MedChem  Project  Issue No.  26.   Pomona
 College, Claremont, CA.

 Howe,  R.B.   and  K.S.  Crump.   1982.   GLOBAL  82.   A  computer  program  to
 extrapolate quantal  animal  tox1c**,y  data  to low doses.   Prepared  for  Office
of Carcinogen Standards, OSHA, U.S. Dept. of  Labor, Washington,  DC.  Control
No. 41USC202C3.

0070h                               -23-                             02/18/87

-------
Khalll,  M.A.K.  and R.A. Rasmussen.   1983.   Gaseous tracers of  arctic  haze.
Environ. Sd. Techno!.  17: 157-164.

Landry,  T.O.,  T.S.  Gushow,  P.M.  Languardt,  J.M.  Wall  and  M.J.  McKenna.
1983.  Pharmacok1net1cs and metabolism  of  Inhaled  methyl  chloride  In the rat
and dog.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  68(3): 473-486.

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F. Reehe  and  O.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook of  Chemical
Property  Estimation  Methods.    Environmental  Behavior  of  Organic  Compounds.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.  p. 4-9, 5-5, 13-15, 15-26, 15-27.

Mackay,  D. and  W.Y.  Shu1.   1981.   A critical  review of Henry's  Law Constants
for chemicals of  environmental  Interest.   J. Phys. Chem.  Ref.  Data.   10(4):
1190.

Mitchell, R.I., K. Pavkov,  R.M. Everett and  D.A.  Holzworth.   1979.   A 90-day
Inhalation  toxicology  study  In rats and  mice exposed  to methyl  chloride.
Submitted by  DuPont  DeNemours  and  Co.,  Inc.   OTS, Washington,   DC.   OTS  No.
878211740, Microfiche No.  205861.

Morgan,  A.,  A.  Black  and  D.R.  Belcher.  1970.   The  excretion   In breath  of
some aliphatic  halogenated  hydrocarbons following  administration  by  Inhala-
tion.  Ann.  Occup. Hyg.  13: 219-233.

Morgan, K.T., J.A. Swenberg,  T.E.  Hamm, Jr.,  R. Wolkowsk1-Tyl and  M.  Phelps.
1982.  Hlstopathology  o.  acute toxic  response 1n  rats  and mice  exposed  to
methyl chloride by Inhalation.  Fund. Appl.  Toxlcol.  2:  293-299.


0070h                               -24-                             02/18/87

-------
 NIOSH   (National   Institute   for  Occupational  Safety  and  Health).   1984.



 Carcinogenic  Risk Assessment  for Occupational  Exposure to Monohalomethanes.



 NTIS PB85-111623.







 Nolan,  R.J.,  O.L.  Rick,  T.O.  Landry,  L.P.   McCarty,  G.L.  Agin  and  J.H.



 Saunders.   1985.   Pharmacoklnetlcs of  Inhaled  methyl  chloride  (CH_C1)  1n



 male volunteers.   Fund. Appl.  Toxlcol.  5(2): 361-369.







 OSHA  (Occupational  Safety  and  Health  Administration).   1985.   Permissible



 Exposure Limits Code of Federal Regulations.  29: 1910.1000.







 Peto,  R.,  M.C.  P1ke, N.E.  Day, et  al.   1980.   Guidelines  for  simple, sensi-



 tive significance  tests  for  carcinogenic  effects  In long-term animal experi-



 ments.   ln_i  Long-term  and  Short-term  Screening  Assays for Carcinogens.   A



 Critical  Appraisal.   IARC   Monographs,  Supplement  2.  WHO,  Lyon,  France.



 p. 378.







 Putz-Anderson,  V.,  J.V.   Setzer,   J.S.   Croxton  and   F.C.  Phlpps.   1981a.



 Methyl  chloride  and  dlazepam  effects  on  performance.    Scand.  J.   Work



 Environ. Health.  7: 8-13.







 Putz-Anderson,  J.V.  Setzer  and  J.S. Croxton.   1981b.   Effects  of  alcohol,



 caffeine and methyl chloride on man.  Psycho!.  Rep.   48(3): 715-725.







 Repko,  J.D.  and  S.M.  Losley.  1979.   Behavioral,  neurological and  toxic



 effects of  methyl  chloride.   A review  of  the  literature.   CRC  CrH.  Rev.



Toxlcol.  6(4): 283-302.









0070h                               -25-                             02/18/87

-------
Repko,  J.D.,  P.O.  Jones,  L.S.  Garcia,  Jr.,  E.J.  Schneider, E.  Roseman  and
C.R.  Corum.   1976.   Behavioral  and neurological effects  of  methyl  chloride.
Behavioral  and  neurological  evaluation  of  workers  exposed  to  Industrial
solvents: Methyl Chloride.  U.S. DHEW (NIOSH) Publ. 77-125.  p.  199.

Simmon,  V.F.   1978.  Structural  correlations  of  carcinogenic and  mutagenlc
alkyl  halldes.   Struct.  Correl.  Cardnog.  Mutagen.   U.S OHEH  Publ.  (FDA);
ISS FDA 78-1046..  p. 163-171.

Simmon, V.F.   1981.   Applications  of  the Salmonella/mlcrosome assay.   Short-
term tests.  Chem. Carclnog.  p. 120-126.

Simmon,  V.F.,  K. Kauhanen  and  R.G. Tordlff.   1977..  Mutagenlc   activity  of
chemicals  Identified 1n  drinking  water.   Dev. Toxlcol.  Environ.  Sc1.   2:
249-258.

Singh,  H.B.,  L.J.  Salas  and  R.E.  Stiles.   1982.   Distribution   of  selected
gaseous  organic  mutagens  and suspect  carcinogens  1n ambient air.   Environ.
Sc1. Technol.   16: 872-880.

Smith,  W.W.    1947.   The  acute  and  chronic  toxlclty of  methyl  chloride.
III. Hematology and biochemical  studies.   J.  Ind. Hyg.  Toxlcol.   29:  185-189.

Smith, W.W. and  W.F.  von  Oettlngen.  1947a.   The  acute and  chronic  toxlclty
of methyl chloride.   I. Mortality  resulting from exposure  to methyl  chloride
In concentrations of 4000-^30 parts per million.   J. Ind.  Hyg. Toxlcol.   29:
47-52.
0070h                               -26-                             02/18/87

-------
 Smith,  W.W.  and W.F. von  Oettlngen.   1947b.   The acute and chronic toxlclty
 of  methyl  chloride.   II. Symptomology  of animals  poisoned by methyl chloride.
 J.  Ind.  Hyg.  Toxlcol.   29:  123-128.

 U.S.  EPA.   1980a.   Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document for Halomethanes.
 Prepared  by  the Office  of  Health and  Environmental Assessment, Environmental
 Criteria  and  Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for the Office of Water Regu-
 lations and Standards,  Washington, DC.  EPA 440/5-80-051.  NTIS PB81-117624.

 U.S.  EPA.  1980b.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  In the  Preparation  of
 Health  Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
 Documents.  Federal  Register.  45(231): 79347-79357.

 U.S.  EPA.   1982.   Errata   for  Ambient Water  Quality Criteria  Document  for
 Halomethanes.   Prepared by  the Office  of  Health and  Environmental  Assess-
 ment,  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office, Cincinnati, OH  for  the
 Office of Water Regulations and  Standards, Washington, DC.

 U.S.  EPA.   1984.   Methodology and Guidelines  for Reportable  Quantity Deter-
 minations  Based on  Chronic Toxlclty Data.  Prepared  by  the  Office  of Health
 and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and  Assessment  Office,
 Cincinnati, OH  for   the Office  of  Solid Waste  and  Emergency  Response,  Wash-
 ington, DC.

 U.S.  EPA.   1986a.    Health and  Environmental  Effects   Profile  for  Methyl
 Chloride.  Prepared  by  the Office  of Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,
 Environmental Criteria  and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati, OH  for  the Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,  Washington, DC.

0070h                               -27-                             06/17/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Guidelines   for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185): 33992-34003.

Wolkowsk1-Tyl, R., A.D. Lawton, H. Phelps and  I.E.  Hamm,  Jr.   1983a.   Evalu-
ation  of heart  malformations  1n  B6C3F1  mouse fetuses  Induced  by in  utero
exposure to methyl chloride.  Teratology.   27(2):  197-206.

Wolkowsk1-Tyl,  R.,  M.  Phelps  and  T.K.  Oavls.   1983b.   Structural  terato-
genlclty  evaluation  of methyl  chloride  1n  rats  and  mice  after  Inhalation
exposure.  Teratology.  27(2):  181-196.

Working, P.K.,  J.S.  Bus  and T.E.  Hamm,  Jr.  1985a.   Reproductive  effects  of
Inhaled  methyl  chloride  In  the  male F-344  rat.   I.  Mating performance  and
dominant lethal assay.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   77(1):  133-143.

Working,  P.K.,   J.S.  Bus  and  T.E. Hamm.   1985b.  Reproductive  effects  of
Inhaled  methyl  chloride  In  the male  F-344 rat.   II.  Spermatogonlal  toxldty
and sperm quality.  Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.   77: 144-157.
0070h                               -28-                             06/17/87

-------
                                                a;
                                                u
                                                L.
                                                01
                                                0)
                                                oe
                                                •   i-
                                                < o
                           Q.
                           Q.
                                  O)
                                  c
                                  0)
                                  I
 o
ti-

 ll)

JS
 fO
O
4J
                                                0)

                                                O
                                                o
                                                V.
                                                0>
                                                L.
                                                a —•
                                                i/» >»
                                                O ns
                                                Ol
                                                o.
                                                O
                                                0£
                                                            f— CO
                                                            oo en
           i— to
           -i O
                                                            u z
                                                            X .*
                                                            CM >^
                                                            CO O>
               » E  c
            oi  o «-
            ecu
           •o  o>  u
              n       *
               E     a; i—
            EEC;
            ex    3   -
            Q.UI v. «*•
              ^o  i/> CM
           o o  >»
           O CM  «3   •
           O    TS O
           r—  L.
               o ui  ••
            L_        I/I  >1
            O vO   - J=  T3
              un  >>-•-> -o
           un va  ?o  c x.
           CM    -o  o  o»
           CM  -^  E J^
              CO  i/l    *x
             -o  i- ^-  o»
           o i—  a 
                                                                             co

                                                                              0)
0070h
     -29-
                                                                     02/18/87

-------