United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
EPA-600/S2-84-033 May 1984
Project  Summary
Hydrocarbon  Solvent Recovery
in  the  Presence  of  Resin
Contaminants
Jim L Turpin
  A system was developed to recover
acetone from  an air stream  in which
there  were suspended  epoxy resin
particles. This  recovery  problem  is
encountered in the manufacture of fiber
glass reinforced plastic pipe. It is repre-
sentative of many other industrial situa-
tions that require the recovery of hydro-
carbon solvents from a gaseous stream
containing resin particles in order to
eliminate atmospheric pollution.
  The system  developed  was' a three-
state  low  temperature  condensation
process  preceded  by   a  cascade
impactor. A scale model of the system
was designed  and constructed. It was
tested in the laboratory and on a split
stream of an actual plant process.
  Roughly 95 percent  of the resin
particles were removed in the impactor.
The first stage condenser operated at
42°F  and removed the  residual resin
particles and roughly 80 percent of the
water brought in with the ambient air.
The second stage operated at -31 °F and
achieved   residual  water  removal.
Acetone of 99 percent  purity  was
recovered in the third stage operating at
-85°F.
  A full-scale system was designed to
process 3800 cfm  of air containing
0.92 (vol) percent acetone and 1.25 x
105 Ib/ft3 of resin particles. The fixed
capital investment for this system was
estimated to be $758,000.
  The developed impactor-condenser
system is a technically feasible process.
It may be  considered as a possible
alternative  in any  solvent  recovery
application. An  economic evaluation
will be required for each  potential
application, with the final decision to
utilize the process being based on the
economics of the specific  recovery
problem.
  The full report was submitted by the
University of Arkansas to fulfill Grant
No. CR807577-01-0 under  the joint
sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and A. O. Smith-
Inland. Inc. It covers the period August
15, 1980 to September 15,1982, and
work  was completed September 15,
1982.
   This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Industrial Environmental Re-
search Laboratory. Cincinnati, OH,  to
announce key findings of the research
project that  is fully documented in a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).
 Introduction
  Hydrocarbon solvents are utilized in
 many  industrial processing schemes
 which require recovery of these solvents
 from a gaseous stream in order to elimi-
 nate  atmospheric pollution. Much is
 known about solvent recovery, and  it is
 practiced widely in the chemical indus-
 tries.  However, recovery solutions  are
 complicated in instances where certain
 contaminants  are  present  in  the
 discharge stream.
  One process for manufacturing rein-
 forced plastic pipe utilizes acetone as a
 solvent  for the resin. The  gaseous
 discharge from the process is an acetone-
 contaminated air  stream,  which  also
 contains resin particles and certain other
 chemical decomposition products. These
 resin  particles plug  conventional

-------
recovery equipment such as adsorption
beds and filters. Other examples of this
type of recovery problem are found in the
plastics  industry,  especially  in  the
production and utilization of epoxy resins.
  It is concluded from available produc-
tion  figures  that  the  problem  of
hydrocarbon recovery in the presence of
resin  contaminants is potentially  very
large.   Extensive consultation with
leading manufacturers of recovery and
cleanup  equipment  reveals that
commercially  available   off-the-shelf
systems are not satisfactory. Thus, the
objectives of this research project were:

  (1) to  develop  a  system  which will
     economically  recover  a  solvent
     from a gaseous stream containing
     suspended   contaminants  such
     resins,

  (2) to construct and test a scale model
     of the recovery system, and

  (3) to design, specify equipment, and
     estimate installed costs for a full-
     scale recovery system.
  The  A. O.  Smith-Inland  (AOS-I) Inc.
manufactures  fiber  glass  reinforced
plastic pipe at their Little Rock, Arkansas,
plant. In the AOS-I process, glass fibers
are pulled through a vat of epoxy resin
and acetone solvent where they are
impregnated with the resin. The resin-
coated fibers travel from the vat over hot
drums.
  A continuous strip of fiber glass rein-
forced plastic (which is later processed
into plastic pipe) is formed on the drums.
The solvent, acetone, is vaporized from
the hot drums, picked up by a blower-
induced air stream passing up over the
drums,  moved into the hood covering the
tape machine, and  exhausted from the
process. The  violent vaporization of the
acetone on the hot drum surface erupts
resin particles into the air stream, where
they  are  captured  and  ultimately
transported into  the exhaust ductwork.
Ambient water vapor enters with the air
stream.
  AOS-I had previously  installed an
acetone recovery system which included
a   water  scrubber,   parallel   carbon
adsorption   beds,  and  a  distillation
column. This unit became permanently
inoperative after only a very short time.
Due to the low efficiency of the water
scrubber, resin carry-over  plugged the
adsorption   beds  and  corroded  the
distillation  unit.  Scrubber screens and
spray  nozzles, were also plugged  with
epoxy.
  Because this acetone-resin system is
representative and because difficulty was
encountered  in dealing with  it, the
system was studied in this  project. The
acetone concentration in the air stream is
well below the lower explosive limit, and
it is expected that other such processes
exhibit air stream  concentrations com-
parable to these. It is likely that these air
streams are discharged directly to the
atmosphere  by most, if not all, of the
industry.

Methodology for  Acetone
Recovery
  Several  alternatives were considered,
including   incineration,  water   spray
scrubbers,  bag and panel  filters, and
molecular sieves. It was concluded that
the optimum  methodology  for  acetone
recovery  would involve the use  of  a
cascade impactor to remove the bulk of
the resin particle contaminants, followed
by a staged condenser system to recover
high purity acetone.
  A  system  using  three  condenser
stages was conceived. The first stage
would operate with a water pool of 42-
50°F to remove roughly 80 percent of the
water plus the residual resin particles
escaping the impactor. The second stage
would operate with  a  glycol-water
mixture at -31 °F to remove essentially all
of the remaining water. The third stage
would operate with a liquid acetone pool
at -85°F to remove up to 90 percent of the
acetone at greater than 98 percent purity.
  A scale model impactor and condenser
system was designed and  constructed.
The design  basis for  the model was 90
cfm air flow.  The  impactor  was a flat-
plate,  cascade type, with provision for
variation of the number of plates, the
spacing  between  plates, the  plate-to-
bottom clearance, and the  slot dimen-
sions of the plate.
  A55-gailonbarrelwitha removable top
was used for each of the three stages. The
process air stream from the impactor was
sparged into the bottom of stage one and
then  passed overhead and  sparged into
the bottom  of  stages two and  three  in
order.
  The model  was tested  utilizing  a
simulated  process  stream.  This was
followed by extensive experimental test-
ing on a split-stream of the main process
stream at the Little Rock, Arkansas, plant
of A. O. Smith-Inland.


Results
  For  the impactor, resin removal effi-
ciencies  of close  to 95 percent  were
 common. Impactor pressure drops were   m
 approximately three  inches  of  water.   ^
 Drainage of the resin from the impactor
 was  good,  and  extended  periods  of
 operation  could  be  achieved  without
 plugging.
   A linear velocity of 2000 ft/min in the
 baffle slots appeared to be  a  feasible
 compromise value as the design basis for
. the full-scale impactor. Lower velocities
 reduce the collection efficiency, whereas
 pressure drop increases as the velocity
 increases.
   For  the model  condenser  system,
 stable operation with pool  temperature
 near  the desired values was achieved.
 The experimental program demonstrated
 that low temperature condensation is a
 technically viable process for recovery of
 acetone.  The  required heat transfer,
 mass transfer, and component separa-
 tion can be achieved in three stages.
   Several different types of equipment
 can be  used  to achieve the three-stage
 recovery.  The required  heat  and mass
 transfer can occur in liquid baths of the
 sort that were utilized in this experiment-
 al  program,   in  counter-current  flow
 packed  beds, or  in finned-tube  heat
 exchangers. Calculations were made for
 each  in order  to  compare  the three    -
 processes.                              U
   The conclusions drawn  from  1hese   ^
 preliminary calculations are that either
 packed  columns or finned exchangers
 would be satisfactory for stages two and
 three, with the decision to be based on
 the economics of the two systems. Stage
 one would require a  packed bed with a
 few inches of liquid pool in the bottom for
 removal of the residual resin particles. A
 finned  exchanger would  not  be
 acceptable for stage one because  of its
 susceptibility to plugging by the resin.
   Several changes were evaluated in the
 processing sequence in  order to get
 better  heat  integration. The finalized
 process flow sheet, including a  material
 and energy balance summary, is included
 in Figure 1.
   The process flow sheet  and process
 description were  submitted  to  several
 companies for a price quotation on the
 equipment, From  these quotes, it was
 estimated that the total installed cost of
 the project would be $758,000.

 Conclusions
   The three-stage low temperature con-
 densation process may be considered as
 a  possible  alternative  in  any  solvent
 recovery application. Stage temperatures   ^
 and other operating parameters are fixed   ^1
 by  the particular system involved, by the

-------
                        QT-I = -678000 Btu/hr  QC.2A = -285330 Btu/hr  Qc-2B = -139560 Btu/hr
                                            , = -311280 Btu/hr
                                                         QHX-I = 285330 Btu/hr
                                                                                             Cascade
                                                                                           Refrigeration
                                                                                              Unit
                                                                      ToAtm
                              Dia. Conduit
                           Qconduit = -91500 Btu/hr
                               v
              Resin   Waste
Basis: 3810 CMF Air Flow at 128°F  Ambient - 100°F, 85°F D.P.
                                               To Acetone
                                                Storage
    Stream
                   8
                                                                             M    N
Air, Ib/hr
Acetone, Ib/hr
Water, Ib/hr
Restn. Ib/hr

Temperature, °F
15400
310
404
2 SB

128
154OO
310
404
0 15

128



270


15400
310
404


105

3760
1 19448


43

3760
119130


43

10
318
0 15

43

3750
119130


38
15400
300
86


42
154OO
290
12


0

10
74


0
15400
281
3


-25

9
9


-25
15400
21
Trace


-85

260
3


-85
15400
21
Trace


-16
Figure 1.    Process flow sheet for Acetone Recovery Project.
specifications on the final effluent, and by
the  specifications  on  the  recovered
component.  The   process   would  be
adapted to meet these specifications and
the  technical  feasibility  affirmed.
Technical  feasibility  can  probably  be
attained  for most recovery problems by
proper selection of operating parameters.
  Material and energy balances would
then be completed, equipment  selected
and  sized,  and  the  economics
determined. The final  decision  for any
potential application would be  made at
that point.
Jim L Turpin is with the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Mark J. Stutsmart is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Hydrocarbon Solvent Recovery in the Presence of
  Resin Contaminants." (Order  No. PB 84-148 170; Cost: $8.50,  subject to
  change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        528S Port Royal Road
        Springfield, v'A 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                                                                U S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, 1984 — 759-015/7698

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

-------