United States
                     Environmental  Protection
                     Agency
Atmospheric Sciences         _^i
Research Laboratory          ~
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711''
                     Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-86/013  May 1986
&EPA          Project  Summary
                     Validation  of   OH  Radical
                     Reaction
                     Rate  Constant  Test  Protocol
                     E. O. Edney and E. W. Corse
                       A study was conducted to evaluate the
                      OH rate constant measurement protocol
                      developed by researchers at the Universi-
                      ty of California at Riverside. The protocol,
                      which is a relative rate method, was used
                      to measure room temperature OH  rate
                      constants for a  series of low molecular
                      weight, high volatility alkanes, alkenes,
                      aromatics, oxygen-containing compounds,
                      and chlorinated compounds. The full
                      report of this research project provides OH
                      rate constants for 21 compounds and a
                      comparison of each value with those
                      reported in the literature.
                       The OH rate constants obtained were in
                      good agreement  with literature values for
                      all  classes  of  compounds except for
                      chlorinated  compounds, for which  rate
                      constants had not been previously deter-
                      mined for most of the compounds studied.
                      The protocol can  be used to determine OH
                      rate constants as low as 0.5 x 10~12
                      cm3/molecule-sec.  The results obtained
                      for  chlorinated compounds suggest that
                      Cl reactions can interfere with the OH rate
                      constant determination; however, if the
                      chlorinated compound is irradiated under
                      conditions of high reference to test com-
                      pound concentration ratios, the effect can
                      be reduced. Further research  is required
                      to establish the validity of the protocol for
                      determining  OH  rate  constants of
                      chlorinated compounds.
                       This Project Summary was developed
                      by EPA's Atmospheric Sciences Research
                      Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, to
                      announce key findings of the research pro-
                     ject that is fully documented in a separate
                      report of the same title (see Project Report
                      ordering information at back).
 Introduction
  Recently, increased attention has been
 given to the possible adverse  health
 effects  associated  with  exposure to
 industrial chemicals  emitted into the at-
 mosphere. To address this issue, the
 Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA)
 Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
 was established in 1977 to gather the in-
 formation necessary to determine the
 health risks associated with exposure to
 present  or future airborne chemicals. To
 evaluate the risks, the distribution, toxici-
 ty, and environmental fate and lifetime of
 industrial chemicals must be established.
  The first step in  establishing atmos-
 pheric lifetimes is to identify the major
 removal  processes.  Gas phase homo-
 geneous removal processes have been in-
 vestigated extensively in the laboratory
 and the results suggest that there are four
 major removal pathways. The suggested
 pathways are: (1) reaction with hydroxyl
 radicals  (OH); (2) reaction with  ozone
 (03); (3) photodissociation; and (4) reac-
 tion  with nitrate radicals  (NO3).  To in-
 vestigate these processes, a series of
 protocols that determine the atmospheric
 lifetimes associated with  OH and O3
 reactions, as well as photolysis have been
 developed for EPA by researchers at the
 Statewide Air Pollution Research Center
 at the University of California at Riverside
 (UCR).
  To validate the protocols,  EPA  con-
 tracted  with  Northrop Services,   Inc.-
 Environmental Sciences to  conduct a
 series of OH and 03  rate constant deter-
 minations, using the UCR methods. The
 results of the OH rate constant validation

-------
study, where room temperature rate con-
stants  for  21  compounds  were deter-
mined, are  presented in the full project
report. Rate constants were determined
for five classes of hydrocarbons: alkanes,
alkenes,  aromatics,  oxygen-containing
compounds, and chlorinated compounds.
The  values obtained  were compared,
where possible, with literature values. A
lower limit  for  which the rate constants
can be evaluated with the protocol was
also  estimated. Special emphasis  was
placed on the  determination of OH rate
constants  for chlorinated  compounds
where the possibility existed that Cl reac-
tions could occur.

Experimental Approach
  The experimental approach employed
was that developed by the UCR. Rate con-
stants for OH were determined by using
a relative rate method, in which the test
compound  was irradiated in air in  the
presence of  methyl nitrite (CH3ONO),
nitric oxide (NO),  and a reference com-
pound whose OH rate constant was well
known. The theoretical chemical reaction
sequence is described in the full report.
  The  rates of reaction with  OH  are
assumed  to  satisfy  the  following
equations:

      — [Test] =   -k10[Test] [OH]     (I)
      dt
      — [Ref] =  -MRefHOH]     (II)
      dt

where [Test] and [Ref] are the concentra-
tions of the test and  reference com-
pounds, respectively, and the kj values are
the associated OH rate constants. Equa-
tions I and II  operate under the assump-
tion that the compounds react only with
OH and are invalid if other reactive species
such as chlorine radicals (Cl) are present
during the irradiation.
   Equations I and II can be combined and
integrated. The result is

          [Test],    k10   [Ref],
      In  - -  = —  In - ^   (III)
[Test],
                          [Ref],
 where [Test],0 and [Ref],0 are the concen-
 trations of the test compound and the
 reference compound at time t0, respec-
 tively, and  [Test],  and [Ref], are  the
 respective concentrations at time t.
   If ln([Test],0/[Test]t) is plotted against
 ln[Ref],0/[Ref]t), a straight line  should be
 obtained with slope equal to k^/k^  and
 intercept equal to zero. The value for the
                              test compound OH rate constant is im-
                              mediately obtained from the slope since
                              the reference compound OH rate constant
                              is known.
Experimental Method
  All irradiations were conducted in pillow-
shaped 2-mil Teflon bags. Bags were con-
structed by heat-sealing three sides of a
4- x  8-ft  sheet of  Teflon.  A  Teflon
Swagelok O-Seal straight-thread connec-
tor was mounted on the bag and was used
for filling and evacuating the bag, as well
as sampling its contents. The volumes of
the bags employed ranged from 50 to 60
L. The irradiation chamber consisted of a
wood cylindrical frame, split lengthwise
with two light banks mounted on the inner
side of the frame. Each  light bank con-
tained five black lamps (General Electric
F40 BLB). A 180 cfm blower was mounted
at the top of the frame and was used to
remove heat from the chamber. To further
minimize temperature increases during the
irradiation, the frame was left open  ap-
proximately 15 cm during the experiments.
A thermometer was mounted inside  the
frame and the maximum temperature in-
crease found during all the experiments
was 2 °C. The initial bag temperature was
controlled by the laboratory temperature
and the temperatures measured during all
the experiments ranged from 21 ° to 26 °C.
  A typical OH  rate  constant determina-
tion consisted of first filling the bag with
approximately 30 L of  clean air (Zero 1.0
Grade from MG Scientific), mixing its con-
tents, and then evacuating it. The bag was
then filled with clean air to a final volume
of approximately 55 L.  The flow rate was
10L/min and was measured with a cali-
brated rotometer. During the filling pro-
cess,  NO, CH3ONO, and  the  test and
reference hydrocarbons were introduced
into the bag by  injecting  the compounds
into a glass tee that was mounted  in the
clean air fill line. All glass syringes were
used for the liquid and gas injections. The
purity of all hydrocarbons employed was
greater than 99%, and they were not fur-
ther purified. Laboratory lights were turned
off and the reaction chamber was covered
during the time the bag was being filled,
and these  conditions  were  maintained
until the irradiation began.  After the bag
was filled and required amounts of gases
added, it was  kneaded to ensure good
mixing.
  The inital  concentrations of CH3ONO
and NO  were approximately 25 ppm and
20  ppm,  respectively. The  initial test
compound concentration ranged from 0.5
ppm to 4.0 ppm, whereas the reference
compound concentration ranged from 0.5
ppm to 64 ppm.  The  initial test and
reference compound concentrations were
determined by gas chromatography (GC).
The chromatographic conditions employed
to detect the compounds are listed in the
full  report.  The initial  CH3ONO and  NO
concentrations were based on the amount
of compound injected.
  A  series  of GC  samples were  taken
before the  irradiation began in order to
determine the stability of the test and
reference  compounds  in  the  dark.  In
general, the sampling continued until suc-
cessive peak  heights of the compounds
differed by less than 2%. Once the irradia-
tion  began, the NO was monitored con-
tinuously and GC  samples were  taken
every 5 or 10 min, depending on the reten-
tion  times of  the compounds.  Typical ir-
radiation times ranged from 30 min to 60
min.
  The hydrocarbon analyses were con-
ducted using two  gas chromatographs
(Perkin Elmer Model 900 and a GOW-MAC
Model  750).  Both  gas chromatographs
contained  flame  ionization detectors.
Nitric oxide concentrations were deter-
mined  with  a Bendix Model  8101-B
NO/N02/NOX  analyzer.
  The  CH3ONO was prepared by drop-
wise addition  of  50% sulfuric acid
(H2S04) to a stirred saturated solution of
sodium nitrite (NaNO2)  in  methanol
(CH3OH). A 50 ml/min N2 stream was
used to transfer the CH3ONO from  the
reaction system to a liquid N2 cold trap,
where it was  collected. The transfer  line
consisted of two bubblers in series in front
of a collection trap used to remove H2SO4
and  H2O. The first bubbler contained a
saturated solution  of sodium  hydroxide
(NaOH) and the second contained Drierite
dessicant.
  Multiple irradiations were conducted for
each compound in order to generate a data
base. Different reference compounds and
initial reference to test compound concen-
tration ratios were employed. A special
protocol was developed to investigate the
OH  rate constants  of chlorinated com-
pounds. In this case, the initial concentra-
tion of test compound was held fixed at
4.0  ppm and the initial reference com-
pound concentration was varied from 1.0
ppm to 64  ppm. The inital CH3ONO con-
centration was also held constant during
the set of experiments.  In addition to using
this  protocol to investigate chlorinated
compounds,  it was also employed to
determine rate constants for propane and
isobutane.

-------
Results and Discussion
  Data for each OH rate constant deter-
mination are provided in the appendix of
the full report. The data include the iden-
tity of the reference compound, the initial
concentrations of the test and reference
compounds, the average temperature and
percent deviation, the slope, intercept, and
correlation coefficient obtained from Equa-
tion III, and the experimentally determined
value for ROH-  The  results  are further
summarized in the report; the average OH
rate constants are listed, as well  as the
average temperatures and percent devia-
tions associated with the  rate constants.
The report also provides, for comparison,
rate  constants  reported  by  other
researchers.
  The OH rate constants obtained for the
alkane class consisting of ethane, propane,
isobutane and cyclohexane were in agree-
ment with those in the literature. The
ethane results suggested that the method
can be used to measure rate constants as
small as 3 x 10~13 cm3/molecule-sec.
However, this may not be  the appropriate
lower limit for compounds that are more
difficult to detect than ethane. Results of
this study support the fact that the rate
constants  obtained for  propane  and
isobutane were independent of the refer-
ence to  test  compound  ratio and were
consistent with the model in that the only
reactive species in the irradiated mixture
was OH.
  The results for the two alkenes studied
(rra/?s-2-butene and isoprene), the five
aromatic compounds (benzene, toluene,
ortho-xylene,  meta-xylene,  and  para-
xylene) and the oxygen-containing com-
pounds  (acrolein,   methacrolein,  and
methylethyl ketone) were also in good
agreement with the literature. The rate
constant found for propylene oxide (1.11
x 10~12 cm3/molecule-sec) agreed with a
value obtained by another researcher using
the relative rate method. However, it was
a factor of two larger than a value obtained
by another researcher who used a flash
photolysis   resonance  fluorescence
method. The  percent deviation for propy-
lene oxide results reported  in the full report
was 68%. Much of the  deviation was
probably due to the difficulty in measur-
ing propylene oxide.
  A large number of experiments were
conducted in this study to evaluate the OH
rate constants of chlorinated compounds.
Many potentially  hazardous compounds
contain chlorine, and the potential for reac-
tions of the test and reference compound
with Cl (if it is produced) is great. A value
of 1.86 x  10~12  cm3/molecule-sec was
found  for  the OH  rate  constant for
trichloroethylene. The relatively large value
for the percent deviation (± 36%) from the
recommended literature value was surpris-
ing since the magnitude of the rate con-
stant found was well above the lower limit
for the  protocol,  and  there  were  no
inherent  difficulties  in   measuring
trichloroethylene.  Results for this study
suggested  the possibility  of  reactions
other than OH attack since the measured
effective rate constant was shown to be
a  function  of the  initial  n-butane to
trichloroethylene concentration. Recent
evidence  shows  that reactive atomic
chlorine  is  produced  in  irradiated
trichloroethylene/nitrous  acid   (HOMO)/
NO/air mixtures. Once produced, Cl  readily
reacts with trichloroethylene to produce
trichloroacetyl chloride, which releases Cl
and thereby  propagates  a Cl  chain
reaction.
  It is reasonable to expect that.CI is pro-
duced in this system, and in addition it is
likely that the production rate of  Cl is pro-
portional to the trichloroethylene concen-
tration. At low [Ref]/[Test] ratios  there ex-
ists the possibility that Cl reactions will be
important,  and  therefore  the relative
decreases in the test and reference con-
centrations  as a  function  of time will
reflect the tendency of  the  two com-
pounds to react with both OH and Cl. The
results,  therefore, cannot be used to ob-
tain the OH rate constant. However, at
high [Ref]/[Test] ratios the system will tend
to be dominated by OH reactions  since the
source of Cl compared to OH is  reduced,
and a major sink for Cl, hydrogen abstrac-
tion from n-butane,  will  have been en-
hanced. Results of this study indicated
that for  [Ref]/[Test]>10, the effective rate
constant was essentially independent of
the concentration ratio. The OH rate con-
stant obtained in this region was 2.85 x
10 ~12 cm3/molecule-sec.
  Analyses similar to that employed for
trichloroethylene were used to  evaluate
the rate constants for vinylidene chloride,
allyl  chloride, benzyl  chloride,  and
chlorobenzene. The results for vinylidene
chloride, allyl chloride, and benzyl chloride
also suggested similar evidence  for Cl
reactions. The OH rate constants derived
for vinylidene chloride, allyl  chloride, and
benzyl chloride using high [Ref]/[Test]
ratios were  14.5 x 10'12,  17.2  x  10'12,
and 2.82 x  10~12 cm3/ molecule-sec,
respectively.  Rate  constants for  these
compounds  have  not  been   reported
previously.
  The average value found for the OH rate
constant for  chlorobenzene was 0.55 x
10  12 cm3/molecule-sec with a percent
deviation of 37%. The data were too scat-
tered to determine whether there were any
Cl reactions occurring in the system. The
value obtained for the rate constant was
close to that  cited as the lower limit for
the  UCR protocol  (0.3  x  10~12  cm3/
molecule-sec) and therefore the scatter
was not surprising. The value for the rate
constant was in reasonable agreement
with two recent measurements.
  The average OH rate constant found for
epichlorohydrin  was  0.55  x  10 ~12
cm3/molecule-sec and the percent devia-
tion was 22%. This result agrees with a
literature value  obtained  by the  flash
photolysis resonance fluorescence tech-
nique. However,  data were  not taken at
enough reference points during this study
to test concentration ratios in order to
detect the presence of  Cl reactions. It is
unlikely  that a  difference would be
detected with such a low value for the OH
rate constant.
  Experiments were also conducted to
determine the OH rate constants with
three slowly reacting compounds. The ex-
periments were unsuccessful because the
decreases in the test compound concen-
trations during the irradiations were within
the  experimental uncertainty of  the
measurements.  These results  further
substantiate the validity of the lower limit
of 3 x 10~13 cm3/molecule-sec for OH
rate constants obtained  with the UCR
protocol.

Conclusions and
Recommendations
  The OH rate constants determined with
the UCR protocol for compounds in the
alkane, alkene, and aromatic classes were
in good agreement with literature values,
as were those for oxygen-containing com-
pounds.  It was found  that there  was a
potential for Cl reactions to interfere with
the determination of OH rate constants of
chlorinated compounds. However, it was
found that  the interference  could  be
decreased by  measuring the effective rate
constant  as  a  function of  the  initial
reference to test hydrocarbon ratio and by
obtaining the OH rate constant from the
asymptotic region (large values for the
reference to test compound ratio), where
the effective rate constant is independent
of the concentration  ratio. Verification of
this method is required and could  be ob-
tained by comparing the results of this
study with those obtained with the flash
photolysis   resonance  fluorescence
method.  In the flash photolysis method,
the OH rate constant is determined from

-------
  the decay of the OH concentration and
  therefore should not be influenced by Cl
  reactions.
    Rate constants  as small as 3 x 10~13
  cm3/molecule-sec (ethane) were obtained
  using the UCR method. For compounds
  that are more difficult to measure, it is like-
  ly that the lower limit is 5 x 10 ~13 cm3/
  molecule-sec.
    All compounds investigated in this study
  were  .low molecular  weight  species
  (molecular weight <200) with substantial
  vapor pressures at room temperature. If
  the UCR method  is to be used for  the
  determination of high  molecular weight,
  low volatility compounds, for which wall
  loss may be substantial and quantitative
  detection difficult, additional studies  will
  have  to  be  conducted to  validate  the
  protocol.
                                Edward 0, Edney and E. W. Corse are with Northrop Services, Inc., Research
                                  Triangle Park, NC 27709.
                                Bruce W. Gay. Jr.. is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
                                The complete report, entitled "Validation of OH Radical Reaction Rate Constant
                                  Test Protocol," (Order No. PB 86-166 758/A S; Cost: $9.95. subject to change)
                                  will be available only from:
                                        National Technical Information Service
                                        5285 Port Royal Road
                                        Springfield, VA 22161
                                        Telephone: 703-487-4650
                                The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                                        Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory
                                        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                        Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                   Center for Environmental Research
                                                                                                            21ALMAIL
Environmental Protection
Agency
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268

/Vv 'x*\
/o --
1 MAW86
\

\ ^ENALTV
PRIVATE
/JSES300
« *
U.S.POSIAGE
= 0 .2 2 z
• a METF.P '
625084! L 	 .-.
EPA/600/S3-86/013
0000329    PS
      ENVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
             U  S

-------