o' V**
                                                                                       -'
                    United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Atmospheric Sciences
 Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-87/002 Apr. 1 987
&EPA          Project Summary
                    Further Studies  of Parameterized
                   Air  Quality  Modeling  Methods for
                    Materials Damage Assessment
                    L R. Dupuis, F. W. Lipfert, and J. W. Peters
/ I V
                     One of the components of the Na-
                   tional Acid Precipitation Assessment
                   Program (NAPAP) deals with damage
                   to materials in the environment. Such
                   an assessment requires detailed infor-
                   mation  on deposition  of  corrosive
                   agents,  namely SO2 and wet IT, on
                   spatial scales compatible with materials
                   distributions in urban areas. The objec-
                   tive was to provide sufficiently accurate
                   deposition estimates for  materials
                   damage for over 100 cities, within very
                   limited time and cost constraints.
                     Since  extant urban  SO2 monitoring
                   data are inadequate to characterize the
                   distribution of air quality within cities
                   (i.e., monitors tend to be located only
                   to meet specific regulatory needs), a
                   modeling approach was necessary to
                   estimate detailed annual average SO2
                   concentrations. The  basic  approach
                   used was  one of parameterization, in
                   which closed-form  algorithms  are de-
                   veloped for point and area sources which
                   mimic the performance of EPA's Cli-
                   matological Dispersion Model  (COM),
                   and allow  rapid assessment of a  large
                   number  of sources. The modeling sys-
                   tem, called PAQMAN (Parameterized
                   Air Quality Model AIMnual), was suc-
                   cessfully applied to over 100 urban
                   areas in the Northeastern U.S. in which
                   materials distributions have been
                   derived.
                     Sensitivity analyses of various model
                   components and assumptions were
                   performed and are described  in this
                   report. The results indicate that model
                   calculations are most sensitive to emis-
                   sion grid cell size (particularly 1-2 km)
                   and to the treatment of a given source
                   as an area or point source depending on
stack height.  Comparisons between
COM and PAQMAN calculations show
PAQMAN to  overpredict or under-
predict point source  impacts for in-
dividual MSA's suggesting that wind
direction effects should be accounted
for in lieu of directional averaging. The
parameterized approach developed for
point sources using the McElroy-Pooler
dispersion  coefficients are supported
by the use of the Briggs curves as well.
Comparisons between PAQMAN values
and observed data (grid square aver-
ages) for several major cities indicate
acceptable agreement, generally within
a factor of 2.
  When considering aggregated effects
across  an  extensive  region involving
thousands  of sources, PAQMAN is a
very  suitable tool  for  estimating SO2
distributions in  urban  areas. Its auto-
mated source-receptor allocation proce-
dures allow for the rapid assessment of
impacts for many sources and receptors
with  minimal user-imput requirements
and computer  running times. Should
the scope of future accessments focus
on a more detailed study of a single city
or a few cities,  more in-depth models
may  be more  suitable. Nevertheless,
some of the automated  procedures
developed in PAQMAN would be useful
in alternative models as well.

  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Atmospheric Sciences Re-
search  Laboratory, Research  Triangle
Park, NC, to announce key findings of
the research project that Is fully docu-
mented In a separate report of the same
title (see Project Report ordering In-
formation at back).

-------
Introduction
  Assessment of damage to materials is
one of the components of the National
Acid Precipitation Assessment Program
(NAPAP)  Damage can result from both
dry and wet deposition of corrosive agents
in the atmosphere, and therefore such
assessments require  appropriate  air
quality and deposition estimates. These
estimates  can be calculated either from
extant monitoring data or by  use of
mathematical models;  mathematical
models are required to evaluate a priori
the potential benefits of candidate control
strategies
  For assessment purposes, the linkages
between  damage to  specific  materials
and the presence of  various  corrosive
agents in  the atmosphere  are made by
using mathematical damage  functions
which have been derived from field and
laboratory tests. The atmospheric species
of interest for materials damage due to
acidic  deposition include  S02,  HN03,
particulates and wet  deposition of  H*.
However, currently available test results
have  limited the present damage func-
tions to gaseous SO2 and wet H+.

Objectives
  This project is concerned with methods
of estimating annual average concentra-
tion levels of S02 in urban  areas for use
with the damage functions in deriving
aggregate economic estimates for large
metropolitan  areas.  Previous  estimates
(EPA/600/8-85/028) were based on S02
estimates  resolved to 5x5 km grid-square
averages using the PAQMAN modeling
system. This grid size was  selected as a
compromise between precision and com-
puting time  requirements.  Additional
studies performed subsequent to the
development of the PAQMAN algorithms
have  involved examination of the sen-
sitivity of some of the modeling concepts.
Results of these studies are described in
this summary.

Technical Approach
  The PAQMAN  system  is  a  param-
eterized  scheme in  which  simplified
algorithms describing the  dispersion of
both  point and area  sources were in-
tended to emulate EPA's Climatological
Dispersion Model (COM). The parametric
studies used to develop these algorithms
involved a range of stack heights and flue
gas  exit  conditions for point sources;
various geometric patterns and emission
densities  were used  for  area sources.
McElroy-Pooler (M-P) dispersion coef-
ficients were used for point  sources while
the Pasquill-Gifford  (P-G)  coefficients
were applied to area sources. Plume rise
was calculated according to the Briggs
method;  removal processes were de-
scribed by an  exponential decay. Wind
roses for New York City (JFK), Pittsburgh
(PIT) and Cincinnati (CVG) were used m
the parametric runs;  the results were
then combined into two generic cate-
gories, coastal  (JFK) and interior (a blend
of PIT and  CVG), in order to eliminate
site-specific wind roses  in favor  of re-
gionally representative meteorology.
  The point source calculation algorithms
were based on the use of the averaged
distance  (rmax) from the source to the
location of the maximum annual average
ground-level concentration as a scaling
parameter. This distance was found to be
proportional to stack height The down-
wind ratio of concentration with respect
to the maximum concentration (x xma*)
was a  function of the ratio downwind
distance  to this  scale length (r/rmax).
xmax  was an  inverse-squared function
of stack height. Such a parameterization
scheme combines all stack heights into
one generalized representation, and im-
plicitly averages all wind directions. The
scheme  thus  requires  only  source-
receptor separation distance to estimate
annual average impact which is a major
computational simplification These sim-
plifying assumptions  and methods also
limit the application of the parameterized
model to cases where there are many
point  sources  of varying heights  and
locations, and  to estimating annual im-
pacts only
  Emission density (Q/A) and scale length
(grid size) were the controlling factors for
the area  source  calculation algorithms.
The underlying assumption is that con-
centration patterns tend to "flow" from
areas  of  high emission density into ad-
jacent areas of lower  emission density,
but not vice-versa.
  A rectangular grid (5-km spacing) was
overlaid encompassing census tract cen-
troids within each /Metropolitan Statistical
Area (MSA). Sources inside this grid with
stack heights less than or equal to 200 ft.
were grouped and treated as area sources;
those  with stack heights greater than
200 ft. were treated as point sources in
the model. All sources  within  50 km
outside the grid boundaries were treated
as point sources. Source emissions data
were obtained from the NAPAP emissions
inventory (Version 2.0) for 1980. Back-
ground S02 estimates (due to sources >
50  km from the MSA boundary)  were
supplied by exogenous calculations based
on Shannon's ASTRAP Model.
Results/Discussion
  Earlier studies in which the PAQMAN
algorithms were exercised for over 100
MSA's throughout the Northeastern U.S.
indicated reasonable agreement between
model  predictions and  observed values
on an  overall, aggregate basis. Further
examination of various model components
and assumptions was performed, and the
results indicate  that model  predictions
are sensitive to some of these factors as
described below.

Sensitivity of PAQMAN
Predictions to Grid Cell Size
  Since area sources within each model
grid square are aggregated and the pre-
dicted contribution (grid square average)
based on emission density is assigned to
the grid centroid,  the area source calcula-
tions are dependent on the grid cell size.
The optimal grid size with which to model
is  an  interesting but complex  problem.
Smaller  grid  spacing allows for  more
detail,  but such detail may not be so
important if the effects are to be aggre-
gated over large areas such as MSA's.
  The  effect  of  applying different grid
size options in PAQMAN was analyzed in
terms of S02 concentrations for some of
the larger urban areas  Results indicate
that MSA-averaged values decrease with
decreasing grid cell size (relative to 5 km),
but show little  change for larger cell
sizes. This is likely due to the increase in
the number of individual grids with pre-
dicted  values at  the lower  levels when
the grid cell size is decreased,  and may
indicate that the area source algorithm is
underestimating  at  the lower  gridscale
levels.

Sensitivity to Designation of
Sources as Area vs. Point
Sources
  The  choice of  200 ft  as the source-
type criterion in  PAQMAN is not purely
arbitrary. Comparison of point and  area
source calculations for a source assuming
a range  of stack heights (for the point
source algorithms) revealed that a source
with a stack  height of 200 ft. would
produce a maximum groundlevel concen-
tration in the point-source mode equiva-
lent to the concentration that would be
predicted if  it were assumed  an  area
source using 5-km emission grids. Similar
analysis assuming different emission grid
sizes  for  the  area  source  calculations
suggests that the stack height criterion
should be adjusted relative to the grid
size chosen in the model.

-------
Sensitivity to Wind Direction
Effects
  One of the major assumptions inherent
in the  PAQMAN  model  is that local
meteorology over  a  long-term, annual
basis can be generalized into a regional
representation. It was thought that this
methodology  would  not introduce any
net bias for a large number of sources
scattered around an urban area. However,
test  case  studies comparing PAQMAN
calculations with COM results for in-
dividual MSA's reflected some bias, par-
ticularly at the lower S02 levels for cities
where major point sources were con-
centrated in a given area.
  For New Haven, PAQMAN underpre-
dicted the  higher point-source impacts
relative to COM. This is explained by the
fact that the major point sources affecting
New Haven are located to the southwest
of the city, and with prevailing winds out
of the  southwest, the  effect  of these
sources is  underestimated by the direc-
tional-averaging  technique  that  was
applied in developing the PAQMAN point
source  algorithms. The opposite effect
occurs for  Pittsburgh since most of the
major point sources  are situated to the
southeast of the city. Thus, the magnitude
and  direction of bias will depend on the
orientation of the major point sources
with respect to a given MSA.
  The errors  induced by the directional
averaging  in PAQMAN may very  well
balance out in the  overall  aggregated
Assessment over the greater than 100
MSA's in the Northeast U.S. Nevertheless,
the  tendency toward over- and under-
prediction of point source estimates (rela-
tive to COM) suggests that wind direction
effects  are important  and  should be
considered.

Sensitivity to the Use of
Alternative Dispersion
Coefficients
  Although the  M-P coefficients have
been recommended by EPA for modeling
point sources  in urban  areas, it is im-
portant to examine whether the param-
eterization  developed will be valid using
alternative  dispersion coefficients. This
was accomplished using the Briggs dis-
persion coefficients, adjusted by  one
stability class (toward  more  unstable
conditions) to  account for increased
turbulence in  urban areas,  in the pa-
rametric COM runs. The results revealed
relationships very similar to those estab-
lished with the M-P dispersion algorithms.
However, the generalization of all stack
heights into a single representation was
 not as  apparent with the  Briggs coef-
 ficients, as shown in Figure 1.
   Figure 1 suggests that perhaps separate
 algorithms describing the decay of con-
 centration downwind of the maximum be
 developed for shorter vs.  taller  stacks.
 However, when the effects are analyzed
 across  an entire MSA, the differences
 described above do not appear  to be
 greatly significant. A  comparison  of
 PAQMAN runs for various MSA's applying
 both the M-P and Briggs  algorithms in
 the point source calculations revealed
 only  minor differences for the  larger
 MSA's. Greater  differences were found
for smaller MSA's where individual point
source effects are likely to have a more
important effect, although SO2 levels are
generally quite low.

Comparison with Monitoring
Data
  Comparisons were  made between
PAQMAN predicted concentrations and
observed  data for some of the larger
cities (where more monitoring data were
available). Monitoring data were acquired
from the  U.S.  EPA's Aerometric Data
Bank as quarterly averages, then averaged
Figure 1.   Concentration ratio vs. distance ratio PIT wind rose - varying H, (m). Briggs' rural
           P's (adjusted upward by one stability class).

-------
 over the entire period in order to derive
 the maximum possible number of annual
 average estimates, compensating for
 periods of missing data. In addition, since
 PAQMAN predicts for grid centroids only,
 comparisons for the same  location (in
 space) were seldom possible. Therefore,
 observed data  falling within the same
 modeled grid square were averaged and
 compared with  the PAQMAN estimate.
   Results showed acceptable agreement
 between  predicted  and observed S02
 values, and are summarized in Table 1. (A
 sample comparison is presented for Cin-
 cinnati, OH in  Figure 2.) PAQMAN pre-
 dictions are  within  a factor  of ±  2 of
 observed values with the exception of a
 few outliers, and within a factor of ± 1.5
 over 70%  of the time  for seven of the
 nine cities analyzed. The mean ratio of
 predicted to  observed  values over the
 nine cities is 1.17; the  median value is
 1.03.
Conclusions
  A method of estimating annual average
S02 concentration levesl in urban areas
has been  developed, to be  used with
damage  functions to derive aggregate
economic estimates of materials damage
for large  metropolitan  areas.  Earlier
studies in which the model was exercised
for over  100 MSA's throughout  the
Northeastern U.S., indicated agreement
generally within a factor 2 between model
predictions and observations on an over-
all, aggregate basis. Further sensitivity
analysis of various model components
and assumptions have  indicated that
some  improvements or  modifications
should be made. These include:
  1. The area source calculation scheme
     should be further  examined since
              the model  may be underpredicting
              area source  impacts at the lower
              (1-2 km) emission grid scales. The
              criterion used to estimate the effect
              of neighboring emission grids  may
              require adjustment, particularly at
              the lower  grid-scale levels where
              emission densities tend to be non-
              homogeneous  from  one  cell to
              another.
            2. The model  may be underestimating
              the  impacts of  individual point
              sources. While area source impacts
              are averaged over a grid  square in
              the model,  point source effects are
              distant-dependent. A similar concept
              of averaging  point source impacts
              over a  given area may be more ap-
              propriate and should be investigated.
            3. The concept of directional-averaging
              for the point source algorithms can
              result in over- or underestimation of
              impacts for individual MSA's where
              major point  sources are concentrated
              within  a given area of the MSA.  This
              suggests that  site-specific wind
              direction effects should be accounted
              for.
            4. The relationships found between
              stack height, maximum ground-level
              concentration and distance to the
              maximum  concentration  in  the
              original COM studies using the M-P
              coefficients are supported using the
              Briggs dispersion  coefficients (rural
              values adjusted to account for in-
              creased turbulence in urban areas).
              However, the concept of collapsing
              all stack heights to a single repre-
              sentation  needs  to  be  examined
              further.  Results  using the Briggs
              values suggest that separate point
              source algorithms should be derived
              for shorter  vs. taller stacks.
                            In spite of these areas of uncertainty
                          comparison of PAQMAN predictions witf
                          monitored data for  several large  urbar
                          areas revealed acceptable agreement
                          Predictions were within a factor of ±2 fo
                          over 90% of  the  total  number  of com
                          parisons; within a factor of ±1.5 for bette
                          than 70% of the comparisons.
                            In the context  of  aggregated effect;
                          across a large region involving thousand:
                          of individual sources, PAQMAN  is a ven
                          suitable tool  for estimating S02 distri
                          butions in urban  areas. If the scope o
                          future materials  damage assessment:
                          narrows to a detailed analysis of a singl<
                          or a  few cities,  a  more  sophisticate)
                          model would be more appropriate. How
                          ever, many of the automated procedure;
                          developed in PAQMAN would be usefu
                          in other  models as well and  should bi
                          considered.
TaWe 1.    PAQMAN vs. Monitored Data Comparisons
PAQMAN
City MSA-Average*
Baltimore
Boston
Chicago
Cincinn ati
Cleveland
New York City
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Washington, DC
28.3
22.8
38.0
33.0
46.0
26.0
34.7
55.5
26.5
Me asured
MS A- Aver ag
24.3
25.8
24.4
31. 1
37.0
35.8
36.7
57.6
24.6
PAQMAN/ Me asured
e Mean
1.27
1.01
1.55
1.14
1.14
0.83
1.10
1.05
1.19
Median %±2
1.04
0.84
1.26
1.14
1.03
0.76
1.02
0.97
0.85
97
95
87
100
95
88
97
100
95
%±1.5
71
68
62
86
82
73
76
85
85
Slope of
Line ar
Regression*'
1.30
0.97
1.52
1.06
1.18
0.73
1.01
0.93
1.28
Average
                  34.5
32.9
                                         1.17   1.03
95
76
                                                                      1.11
* Average for grid squ ares with monitored d at a (background included).
** Regression forced through origin. PAQMAN value as dependent variable.
  Average over entire data set.

-------
   700
       0    25    5    75   10   125  75   775  20   225  25   27 5   30  32.5   35  375  40   42.5  45  47.5   50

                                                     Measured S02

Figure 2     Comparison of PAQMAN vs measuredSOz- Cincinnati, OH f/jg/m3}.
                                           L. R. Dupuis, F  W Lipfert, and J, W.  Peters are with Brookhaven National
                                             Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973.
                                           Francis S. Binkowski is the EPA Project Officer (see below)
                                           The complete report, entitled "Further Studies  of Parameterized Air Quality
                                             Modeling Methods for Materials Damage Assessment," (Order No. PB 87-
                                             145 280/AS. Cost: $13.95, subject to change)  will be available only from:
                                                   National Technical Information Service
                                                   5285 Port Royal Road
                                                   Springfield, VA 22161
                                                   Telephone: 703-487-4650
                                           The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                                                   Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory
                                                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                                   Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

-------