United States
Environmental Protection
Agency	
Environmental
Research Laboratory
Gulf Breeze. FL 32561
Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-87/032  Dec.  1987  ' >
Project Summary

Microinjection  of Fish
Embryos as a  Laboratory
Assay for Chemical Carcinogens
John M. Grizzle and Marshall R. Putnam
   During  this  project, techniques
were developed  for microinjection of
chemicals  into  fish eggs, lesions
were described  in fish reared from
injected eggs, and eggs of various
species were compared to determine
which were best suited for use in
carcinogenicity  assays. Eggs of  the
following species were injected: gulf
killifish, sheepshead minnow, rivulus,
inland silverside, gulf toadfish, and
channel catfish. Chemicals injected
into eggs were  diethylnitrosamine,
N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitroso-
guanidine (MNNG), aflatoxin B1, and
trichloroethylene.
   Quantification of carcinogen
dose in the egg immediately after
Injection indicated that variation of
the dose  retained  was a  major
problem.  During  the  project,
improvements  in procedures  re-
suited in increased mean percentage
of the dose remaining in the egg, but
variation between eggs remained
high.
   The incidence of all lesions,  and
especially neoplasms,  was low,
probably because of the low doses
retained in the eggs.  The  most
important  lesion found during this
project was a pancreatic acinar  cell
carcinoma in a  gulf killifish injected
with MNNG.
    Gulf killifish,  sheepshead min-
now, and rivulus eggs have potential
for use in  carcinogenicity assays.
However,   improvements   in
microinjection techniques  are
needed before  an  assay system
involving injection of test chemicals
 into embryos of these species can be
 used  reliably. Our results suggest
 that  channel  catfish  are  less
 susceptible than other species to the
 pathologic effects of the chemicals
 that we tested.
   This  Project  Summary  was
 developed by EPA's  Environmental
 Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, FL,
 to announce key findings of the
 research project that is fully doc-
 umented in a separate report of the
 same  title  (see  Project  Report
 ordering information at back).

 Introduction
    Several  species of fish  are
 potentially valuable as laboratory animals
 in oncology  Numerous studies have
 indicated that fish develop neoplasms
 after  exposure to a variety of known
 carcinogens. For some  fish models, the
 neoplastic responses of fish to chemical
 carcinogens resemble those of rodents.
 Two major advantages  of fish as assay
 animals are  evident  from  previous
 studies. The length of time required for
 neoplasms to develop in fish is often less
 than 6 months and has been reported as
 5 to 8 weeks in  some experiments. In
 addition, spontaneous  neoplasms  are
 rarely  found in non-exposed fish used in
 laboratory assays. These features of fish
 assay  systems indicate that they could
 be  useful as  alternative or  com-
 plementary tests for carcinogens.
   Rainbow  trout,  Salmo gairdneri,
 embryos are  highly sensitive to
 chemically induced neoplasia, embryo
 exposure of Shasta strain rainbow trout
 appears to be the most sensitive model

-------
available for hepatocarcinogenicity  of
aflatoxin B1  (AFB). Initially, embryo
exposures involved  dipping whole eggs
into the test  solution, a technique that
worked  well with  slightly water-soluble
carcinogens such as AFB. However, this
model  is not suitable for  exposing the
embryos  to  highly  water-insoluble
chemicals.
    Microinjection of carcinogens inside
fish  eggs  ensures exposure of the
embryo  to the test chemical.  This
technique  has  been  used  to induce
neoplasms  in rainbow  trout  and  coho
salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, exposed
to a  variety of carcinogens. Micro-
injection using acetone or  dimethyl-
sulfoxide (DMSO)  as carriers for test
chemicals allows  embryo  exposure  to
highly  water-insoluble compounds such
as   benzo[a]pyrene  and  7,12-
dimethylbenz(a)anthracene. An additional
advantage of the microinjection method
is the diminutive amount  of test chemical
needed.
    Although fish  embryo  exposures
appear to be a promising method to test
new chemicals  for  carcinogenicity, the
use of salmonids presents limitations  to
this  model. These limitations include
exacting rearing conditions needed  for
these species, long generation time, and
difficulty in obtaining eggs outside  of the
short,  natural spawning season.  The
relative merits of non-salmomd species
for use in embryo exposure models have
not been adequately tested.  There are
many fish  species that  would eliminate
all of the limitations listed above for the
salmonid species.
    The objectives  of this project were
(1)  to  develop  techniques needed  for
microinjection of chemicals  into eggs  of
several fish species, (2) to compare eggs
of several fish  species to  determine
which  are best  suited  for  use  in
carcinogenicity assays,  and (3)  to
determine the types of lesions resulting
from  exposure  of eggs  to known
carcinogens.  Ultimately this could  result
in a method for rapid, reproducible, and
sensitive screening of chemicals relevant
to humans.
    Six species of  fish were selected for
this project:  gulf killifish   (Fundulus
grandis),  sheepshead   minnow
(Cyprinodon variegatus), rivulus (Rivulus
ocellatus), inland   silverside  (Menidia
beryllina), gulf toadfish (Opsanus  beta),
and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).
Chemicals  injected  into eggs  were AFB,
diethylnitrosamine  (DEN),  N-methyl-
N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine  (MNNG),
and trichloroethylene (TCE).
Results

     Hatching  percentages  of  some
groups of injected channel catfish and
gulf killifish eggs were nearly as high as
for unmjected eggs. The highest survival
of sheepshead  minnow  eggs was  less
than one-half  of the  percentage  for
uninjected  eggs. Eggs  that  were not
disinfected  with antibiotics had a  lower
hatching  percentage  that  disinfected
eggs. There was only a small  difference
between groups of sheepshead minnow
eggs injected in the perivitelline space or
into  the yolk sac. Only two  groups of
inland  silversides eggs were injected
because hatching percentage of injected
eggs was low [9%  for  DMSO injected
(control)  and  8% for  DEN  injected].
Hatching percentages of many groups of
eggs injected with test chemicals were
as high or higher than eggs injected with
DMSO or  saline. Except for inland
silversides,  the  lowest  hatching
percentages were above 12%.
     Long-term  survival of  test fish was
highly variable among groups of fish, but
survival  did  not  seem  related to
treatment. Many  of the test  fish  and
controls  died  of infectious diseases.
Enteric septicemia of catfish caused by
the bacterium Edwardsiella ictaluri killed
most of the  fish in some of the channel
catfish treatments, including the DMSO-
injected controls. Posthatching  survival of
injected toadfish  was  low, apparently
because of fungal infections. These fish
could  have  been predisposed to this
disease because of injury caused by the
injection.  An intestinal  protozoan  was
noted  in  sections of  sheepshead
minnows.
     Quantification  of  carcinogen  dose
retained in  the egg  immediately after
injection  indicated that variation in the
percentage of  the dose  retained  was a
problem  in  our methodology.  Rivulus
eggs injected  in the perivitelline space
retained  less than 7% of the nominal
dose and those injected in the yolk sac
retained 6 to 27%. One attempt to inject
0.25 ill instead  of the usual 0.5 nl dose
did not improve the results. Injection  of
sheepshead minnow eggs was the most
successful, 35 to 47%  of the  dose was
retained.  Standard  deviations  were
approximately equal to the  mean for
most injections of labeled  compounds.
The syringe system was not the source
of  error  because  the  mean  dose
delivered was 106% of the nominal dose
with a standard deviation of 6%.
    The  incidence of  all  lesions, and
especially neoplasms, was low, probably
because of the low doses retained  in the
embryos.  Two  neoplastic  lesions  and
another lesion that further  study may
determine to be neoplastic were found in
carcinogen-exposed fish. Other  lesions
were  preneoplastic, teratogenic,  toxic
reactions,  or  pathogen  related. Lesions
caused  by  pathogens  were  not
considered in this report, although the
occurrence of infectious diseases could
have  been influenced by the  chemical
exposures.
    The  most important  lesion  found
during this study  was a pancreatic acinar
cell  carcinoma  in  a  gulf   killifish
necropsied 139 days after an injection of
2 ng MNNG. This neoplasm had invaded
the posterior  liver. The  tumor  cells
resembled pancreatic acinar  cells by
having basophilic  cytoplasm except for
the  strongly  eosmophilic  zymogen
granules. The cells tended  to form acini
and had a high mitotic index. This is only
the third  report  of  an experimentally
induced  neoplasm  of  the  exocrine
pancreas in fish.
    Sheepshead  minnows injected with
DEN or AFB  tended to have  increased
numbers of rodlet cells in the mesentery
or mesenteries.  Nuclear pleomorphism
was  observed in  livers  of AFB injected ,
sheepshead minnows. Lesions  in  rivulus'
injected  with  DEN included hepatic
adenoma,  megalocytic hepatosis, nuclear
pleomorphism, thyroid hyperplasia, and a
convoluted retina embedded in  the brain.
Nuclear  pleomorphism  was  also
observed in the  liver of rivulus injected
with  AFB.  A  mass that has  not  been
identified yet  was found in  the  posterior
body  cavity of  a  rivulus  injected with
MNNG. No lesions related to carcinogen
exposure  were  observed in the 72
exposed channel catfish examined. Only
one  gulf  toadfish exposed to a-test
chemical survived until necropsy; this fish
had no lesions.

Conclusions and
Recommendations
     Survival of channel catfish and gulf
toadfish   embryos  injected  with
stainless-steel  needles (31  gauge)  was
satisfactory as was the survival of gulf
killifish, sheepshead minnow, and  rivulus
injected with  sharpened glass needles
(48  to 112  urn  outside  diameter).
Mortality  of  injected inland  silverside
embryos was too high for this species to
be useful  for this  technique. Survival of
sheepshead  minnows  was similar for
injection of test  chemicals  into the yolkd
sac or into the perivitelline space. A 5-
minute  rinse  in  a combination  of
penicillin,  streptomycin,  and fungizone

-------
reduced the number of embryos killed by
bacterial and  fungal infections. Although
these  antimicrobial  drugs  reduced
mortality of  injected embryos, future
research  should  consider their possible
role as  promotors or  inhibitors  of
neoplastic responses.
    Quantification  of  carcinogen dose
retained in  the egg immediately after
injection indicated  that variation  in  the
percentage  of the  dose retained was  a
problem.  During  this  project,  im-
provements  in procedures  resulted in
increased mean percentage  of the dose
remaining in  the  egg,  but  variation
between eggs remained high. Additional
research  is  needed  to  complete
development  of techniques for accurate
delivery  and adequate  retention  of
carcinogens in small eggs of fish.
    The  incidence of  lesions,  and
especially neoplasms, was probably  low
because of the low doses retained in the
embryos  The variation  in  retention of
carcinogen  could have  resulted  in
survival of fish that retained little of  the
dose while  other  fish, injected with  the
same nominal dose, died  because they
retained a higher percentage. This would
have biased  the  lesion-incidence data
because it was not possible to determine
which fish retained  high doses.

    The use  of  fish embryo exposures
seems promising as a method to induce
pancreatic tumors  that could be used to
resolve questions  about histogenesis of
exocrme  pancreatic carcinomas  There
are only two previous reports of chemical
carcinogens  inducing   pancreatic
neoplasms  in fish  and both  of  these
previous  studies  involved exposure of
young  fish   Our  results  support  the
hypothesis  that the types  of neoplasms
developing  in carcinogen-exposed  fish
depend on the  age of the fish  when
exposed.

    Gulf  killifish,  sheepshead minnow,
and rivulus eggs have potential for use in
carcinogenicity  assays.  Eggs  of  these
species can  be  easily obtained  at  any
time of the  year,  and these  species
develop neoplasms after exposure to
carcinogens.  However,  improvements in
micromjection techniques  are needed
before an  assay system  involving
injection of test chemicals into embryos
of these species  can be  used reliably.
Gulf toadfish and  channel  catfish have
relatively large eggs, an advantage for a
micromjection  assay, but eggs of these
species  are  available  only during  a
relatively  short  spawning  season.  In
addition, our results suggest that channel
catfish  are less  susceptible than other
species to the pathologic effects of the
chemicals that we tested. The  biologic
basis for the low susceptibility of channel
catfish to  carcinogens  should  be
investigated.
    With some  further  development,
micromjection of fish eggs appears to be
a promising  method for testing  chemical
carcinogens. The problem of inconsistent
delivery of  test chemicals to fish eggs
must  be solved before  embryos  of
sheepshead  minnow, gulf killifish, and
rivulus can  be used  in a micromjection
test procedure. Reasonable  approaches
for  resolving  this experimental problem
include  injection  of  smaller  volumes of
the test chemical, use  of  smaller
diameter needles,  a partial enzymatic
digestion of  the  chorion of the  egg, or
use of other fish  species such as brown
bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus) and black
bullhead (Ictalurus me/as).
   John M. Grizzle and Marshall R. Putnam are with Auburn University, Auburn,
     AL 36849.
   John A. Couch is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report,  entitled "Micromjection of Fish Embryos as a Laboratory
     Assay for Chemical Carcinogens," (Order No. PB 88-124 623/AS; Cost:
     $12.95; subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Ftoya! Road
           Springfield, VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Environmental Research Laboratory
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Sabine Island
           Gulf Breeze,  FL 32561

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S3-87/032

      0000329   PS

      U  S  £ĞMR PROTECTION
      REGION 5  LIBRflRT
      230  S  DEARBORN  STREET
      CHICAGO             IL   60604

-------