United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-86/002  Apr. 1986
&EPA         Project  Summary
                   Environmental Assessment of
                   NOX  Control  on  a  Spark-Ignited,
                   Large-Bore,  Reciprocating
                   Internal-Combustion  Engine
                   C. Castaldini
                    This two-volume report gives emis-
                   sion results for a spark-ignited, large-
                   bore, reciprocating, internal-combustion
                   engine operating both under baseline
                   (normal) conditions, and with combus-
                   tion modification  controls to  reduce
                   NOX emissions to levels below the pro-
                   posed new source performance stan-
                   dard (NSPS) for such engines. Exhaust
                   gas measurements (in addition to con-
                   tinuous monitoring of  criteria  gas
                   emissions) included total organics in
                   two boiling point ranges, compound
                   category information within these
                   ranges,  specific  quantitation  of the
                   semivolatile organic priority pollutants
                   (POMs), flue gas concentrations of 73
                   trace elements, and particulate matter.
                   Exhaust NOx emissions were reduced
                   almost 50 percent, from a baseline level
                   of 1,260 ng/J to 654 ng/J (730 to 420
                   ppm, corrected to 15 percent O2 dry) by
                   increasing the  operating  air/fuel ratio
                   of the engine.  Accompanying this re-
                   duction was a slight increase in engine
                   efficiency. CO, methane, total hydro-
                   carbon, and total semivolatile organic
                   compound emissions were increased
                   from 10 to 65  percent under low-NO*
                   operation.  However, total nonvolatile
                   organic emissions decreased 55  per-
                   cent. The organic  emissions for both
                   tests consisted primarily of aliphatic
                   hydrocarbons  with some carboxylic
                   acids, phenols, and low-molecular-
                   weight fused-ring aromatics.  POMs
                   were detected in concentrations below
                   4 /^g/dscm.
                    This Project Summary was developed
                   by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, NC, to announce key findings of
the research project that is fully docu-
mented in two separate volumes of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).
Introduction
  This report describes emission results
obtained from field tests of the exhaust
gas from  a spark-ignited,  large-bore,
reciprocating, internal-combustion en-
gine. Objectives of the tests  were to
measure exhaust gas emissions and
evaluate the operating efficiency of the
engine, both under baseline (normal)
operating conditions, and with combus-
tion modification controls to reduce NO,
emissions to levels below the proposed
new source performance standards
(NSPS) for such  engines. Emission
measurements included  continuous
monitoring of exhaust gas emissions;
source assessment sampling  system
(SASS) sampling of the exhaust gas with
subsequent laboratory analysis of sam-
ples to give total flue gas organics in two
boiling point ranges, compound category
information within these ranges, specific
quantitation of the semivolatile organic
priority pollutants, and flue gas concen-
trations of 73 trace elements; and Method
5 sampling for particulate.
  Exhaust  NOx emissions were reduced
almost 50 percent, from a baseline level
of 1,260 ng/J to 654 ng/J by increasing
the operating air/fuel ratio of the engine.
Accompanying this reduction was a slight
increase in engine efficiency. CO, meth-
ane, total hydrocarbon, and total semi-
volatile organic compound emissions

-------
were increased from 10 to 65 percent
under Iow-N0x operation. However, total
nonvolatile organic emissions decreased
55  percent.  Emissions  of  anthracene/
phenanthrene and chrysene/benz(a)
anthracene were 3 to 4 /ug/dscm for both
tests; levels of other ROMs were less than
detectable (2  /ug/dscm). The organic
emissionsfor both tests consisted primar-
ily of aliphatic hydrocarbons with some
carboxylic acids, phenols, and  low-
molecular-weight fused-ring aromatics.

Summary and  Conclusions

Test Engine

  The  test  engine  was  a large-bore,
turbocharged,  1,120-kW  (1,500-Bhp)
two-stroke, opposed-piston spark-ignited
Model 37TDSB-1 /8 engine manufactured
by the Fairbanks Morse Engine Division
of Colt Industries. Figure 1, a schematic of
the engine,  shows the  turboblower ar-
rangement for the inlet combustion  air
and the opposed  piston  design. The
combustion air is drawn into the turbo-
charger, where it  is  compressed and
discharged through  an  air  cooler to the
positive-displacement lobe-type blower.
The blower,  driven by the upper engine
crankshaft, discharges the  air directly to
the cylinders through the engine intake
manifold. The air/fuel  mixture is  com-
pressed between the two pistons which
work vertically toward each other in each
cylinder. The  upper and lower pistons
drive separate crankshafts interconnected
by a vertical drive. Hot exhaust gas from
the lower cylinder ports drives the turbine
of the turbocharger assembly. The fuel is
ignited by spark ignition cells, arranged
two per cylinder.

Engine Operation and
Test Arrangements
  The test program called for the analysis
of  flue gas samples  collected during
normal operation (baseline  conditions)
and with combustion modifications ap-
plied to lower NO*  emisisons. Table 1
summarizes the engine specifications and
operating parameters during both the
baseline and Iow-N0x tests.
  Since this engine design  is  usually
marketed without the turbocharger and
manifold air cooler  existing on the test
engine, it was necessary to reduce the
effect of turbocharging  during the base-
line test. To reduce the effect of turbo-
charging, a portion of the combustion air
was bypassed  around the manifold  air
cooler. The resulting increase in combus-
tion airtemperature  lowered the air mass
               Upper
             Crankshaft
      Compressor
      (1st stage)
                                                               Blower
                                                               (2nd stage
                                                               in series)
              Exhaust
              Outlet
Figure 1.    Schematic of turboblower arrangement (courtesy of the Fairbanks Morse Division of
           Colt Industries).
flowrate, giving an air/fuel ratio which is
more representative  of the blower-
scavenged design. The percent bypass air
during the baseline tests was  16.4 per-
cent, determined by the air flow control
limits available on this test engine. Thus,
baseline operation was as representative
of normal blower-scavenged engine
operation as could be achieved with the
turbocharger in place.
  The low-NOx operation consisted of
increasing the air/fuel ratio by elimina-
ting the manifold air cooler bypass used
during the baseline test and increasing
the efficiency of the inlet manifold cooler.
This modification reduced the inlet air
temperature as well  as increasing  the
air/fuel ratio. Engine power output was
maintained nearly constant by decreasing
fuel flow,  while efficiency increased by
about 0.4 percent during the Iow-N0x
test.

Emission Measurements and
Results
  The sampling and analysis procedures
used in this test program conformed to a
modified EPA Level 1 protocol.  Except for
continuous monitoring  of exhaust  gas
emissions, all exhaust gas was measured
at the engine muffler exit into the  un-
insulated exhaust stack.  Emissions
measurements included:

 • Continuous monitoring for NOX,  NO,
   CO, CO2, 02, TUHC, and CH4
 • Source assessment sampling system
   (SASS) for trace element and organic
   emissions
 • EPA Method 5 sampling for solid and
   condensable particulate  mass emis-
   sions
 • Grab sampling for onsite analysis of Ci
   to Cs  hydrocarbons  by gas chroma-
   tography
 • Bosch smoke pot

In addition, samples of the engine lube oil
were collected for analysis.

 • Analyzing the lube oil and SASS train
   samples for  73 trace elements using
   spark  source mass  spectrometry
   (SSMS), supplemented by atomic ab-
   sorption spectrometry (AAS)

-------
 Ttble 1.    Spark Engine Design and Operating Parameters

 Design Parameters
 (Engine Specifications)
  Model designation
  Configuration
  Bore, m tin.)
  Stroke, m (in.)
  No. of cylinders
  Displacement/cylinder m3 (in.3)
  Compression ratio
  BMEP, kPa (psi)
  Power/cylinder at rpm, kWt (Bhpl
  Spark timing

  Lubricating oil
  Hours since overhaul

Operating Parameters
  38TDS8-1/8
  2 stroke, O.P.
  0.206(8-1/8)
  0.254 (10) x 2
  6
  0.017(1037)
  9.7:1
  731 (106)
  186 (250) at 900
  4.5° before minimum
   volume (BMV)
  Pegasus 485
  1050

   Baseline
/V0« Control Test
RPM (percent rating)
KWt (Bhp) (percent rating)

kW, (percent rating)
BMEP, kPa (psi)
Fuel flow, m3/hr(ft3/hr)
BSFC. g/kW-hr (Ib/Bhp-hr)
Fuel rate, kW fuel/kW out (Btu/Bhp-hr)
Ignition timing
Compressor inlet air temp., K (°F)
Compressor outlet air temp.. K (°F)
Manifold air cooling bypass, percent
Blower suction air temp., K (°F)
Blower discharger air temp., K (°F)
Blower discharge pressure, kPa (psig)
Air flow, kg/s (Ib/min)
Fuel-air ratio
Combined cylinder exhaust temp., K (°F)
Turbine exhaust temp., K (°F)
Lube oil consumption, ml/s (gph)
Engine efficiency, percent
900(100%)
1,117(1,498)
(99.8%)
1.085 (97.8%)
731 (106)
354 (12.492)
217(0.356)
2.91 (7413)
4.5° BMV
302 (85)
356(181)
16.4
331 (136)
345(161)
60(8.7)
2.56(338.3)
0.0271
732 (858)
652 (715)
0.45 (0.43)
34.3
900 (100%)
1.123(1,505)
(100%)
1.091 (98.9%)
731 (106)
352 (12.426)
215(0.353)
2.88(7340)
4.5° BMV
302 (85)
359 (187)
0
316(110)
337(146)
71 (10.3)
2.90(383.4)
0.0240
699 (799)
617(652)
0.45 (0.43)
34.7
Average Ambient Atmospheric Conditions

  Outdoor temp, dry bulb. K (°F)                281 (46)
  Barometric pressure, kPa (in. Hg)              98.2 (29.08)
  Humidity, percent                          60
                       284(51)
                       98.6(29.20)
                       62
• Analyzing SASS train samples for total
  organic content  in two boiling point
  ranges: 100 to 300°C by total chro-
  matographable organics (TCO) analysis
  and >300°C by gravimetry (GRAV)
• Analyzing  the SASS train sorbent
  module extract  for 58  semivolatile
  organic species including many POM
  compounds
• Performing infrared (IR) spectrometry
  analysis of organic sample extracts
• Performing liquid chromatography(LC)
  separation of selected sample extracts
  with subsequent TCO, GRAV, and IR
  analyses of LC fractions
 • Performing direct insertion probe and
   batch inlet low resolution mass spec-
   trometry (LRMS) of selected sample
   extracts

  Bioassay tests were also performed on
the exhaust sample SASS organic sorbent
module extract to estimate this sample's
potential toxicity and mutagenicity.
  Table 2 summarizes exhaust gas emis-
sions measured  in the test program.
Emissions  are presented  in both ng/J
heat input  and as  mg/dscm of exhaust
gas.
  As noted  in Table 2, NO* emissions
were decreased under Iow-N0« operation
to 654  ng/J from a baseline of 1,260
ng/J. This decrease in NO* emissions
was accompanied by  increases in all
relatively volatile combustible emissions,
CO,  TUHC, ChU, and total semivolatile
organics,  although  nonvolatile organic
emissions decreased. Emission levels of
the inorganic elements noted in Table 2
were relatively unchanged in going to
low-NOx operation  from  the baseline
condition.
  As a measure of the  potential signifi-
cance of emission levels for further
monitoring and evaluation. Table 2 also
lists occupational exposure guidelines for
most pollutants in the table. The guide-
lines listed are generally either the time-
weiflhted-average Threshold Limit Values
(TLV) established by the American Con-
ference of  Governmental Industrial
Hygienists, or the 8-hour time-weighted-
average exposure limits estabalished by
the  Occupational Safety  and Health
Administration. These are noted only to
aid  in  ranking  emissions for further
evaluation. In this respect, species emit-
ted at levels several orders of magnitude
higher than their guideline might warrant
further consideration. Species emitted at
levels significantly lower than their oc-
cupational exposure guideline might be
considered of lesser concern. Only ele-
ments emitted at levels exceeding 10
percent of their guideline are noted in
Table 2.
  Table 2 shows that the only pollutants
emitted at levels which exceeded their
respective guidelines were N0>, CO, and
Cu in the baseline test and NO,, CO, Cu,
Fe, and Cr in the Iow-N0x test. The trace
elements were emitted at levels at most a
few times higher than their guidelines. In
contrast, the criteria pollutants CO and
NOx were present in the exhaust at levels
of almost one (CO) to well over two (NO,)
orders of  magnitude higher than their
guidelines. This suggests that NO* emis-
sions achieved may be  the most signifi-
cant change.
  Analyses of SASS train  samples for
POM and other organic compounds (the
semivolatile organic priority pollutant
species) were  performed.  Only anthra-
cene/phenanthreneandchrysene/benz-
(a)anthracene isomers were detected at
levels above  2 /yg/dscm. These were
present at 3 to 4 //g/dscm levels for both
tests.
  SASS train  organic  extract samples
were subjected to LC fractionation with
TCO, GRAV, IR, and LRMS analysis of LC
fractions in  attempts  to elucidate  the
chemical character of the exhaust gas
organic  material. These analyses sug-

-------
Table 2.    Summary of Flue Gas Emissions"
                                        Baseline Test
                                              Low-NO» Test
         Compound
 Per Heat
  Input
  (ng/J)
  Average
Concentration
 (mg/dscm)
 Per Heat
  Input
  (ng/J)
  Average
Concentration
 (mg/dscm)
Occupational
 Exposure
 Guideline"
 (mg/dscm)
Criteria Pollutant and
Other Vapor Species

NO, (as /VOW
CO
CH<
TUHC(asC3Hei
Solid paniculate
Condensable paniculate
Total chromatographabale
  organicsfC-i -Cw)
Total nonvolatile organics
1.260
  120
  293
  960
   12.5
    7.3
    1.3

   35
 1,900
   198
   480
 1,600
    20
    12
     2.1

    57.8
 654
 198
 323
1,100
   16.2
    7.5
    1.6

   15
  976
  295
  482
 1,640
    24.2
    11.2
     2.4

    22.1
   6.0
  55
  10.0"
Trace Elements
Copper, Cu
Iron, Fe
Chromium, Cr
Phosphorus, P
Silver, Ag
Potassium, K
Sodium, Na
Lead, Pb
Calcium, Ca
Selenium, Se
Cobalt, Co
Nickel, Ni
0.15
—
0.0/3
0.0067
0.0010
>0.48
>0.48
0.012
0.35
0.035
—
0.0014
0.25
_ e
0.022
0.011
0.0017
>0.80
>0.80
0.020
0.59
0.059
—
0.023
0.18
1.1
0.053
0.060
0.0046
>0.66
>O.54
0.0074
0.18
0.023
0.018
0.0013
0.27
1.6
0.079
0.090
0.0068
0.98
0.80
0.011
0.27
0.034
0.027
0.00/9
O./O"
1.0
0.050
0.10
0.010
2.0'
2.0"
0.050"
2.0
0.20
0.10
0.10
"Exhaust Oz and COz levels were 12.1 and 4.9 percent, respectively, for the baseline test and 13.2 and4.4 percent, respectively, for the low-NO, test.
"Time-weighted-average, TLV, unless noted.
"For nuisance paniculate.
"8-Hr time-weighted-average OSHA exposure limit.
'Dashes indicate the pollutant was not quantifiable.
'Ceiling limit.
gested that the exhaust gas organic for
both tests was primarily aliphatic hydro-
carbons,  with some carboxylic acids,
phenols, and low-molecular-weight
fused-ring aromatics (e.g., naphthalene
and alkyl naphthalenes).
  Health  effects  bioassay tests were
performed on the organic sorbent (XAD-
2) module extract from  the SASS trains
for both the baseline and the low-NOx
tests. The bioassay tests performed were
the Ames  mutagenicity and the  CHO
cytotoxicity assay. The  results of these
assays are summarized  in Table 3 for the
exhaust gas  sample (organic  sorbent
module extract from the SASS train) for
both the baseline and Iow-N0x tests. The
results  suggest  that the exhaust  gas
under both baseline and Iow-N0x opera-
tion is of moderate to  high toxicity and
mutagenicity. This is a typical bioassay
response for combustion source XAD-2
extract.
          Table 3.    Bioassay Analysis Results

                               Bioassay Analysis
            Sample     Test
                                CHO"
                       Ames
          XAD-2
           Extract   Baseline     H/M       H

          XAD-2
           Extract  ' Low-NO,     H/M       M

          *H = high toxicity; M - moderate toxicity.
          "H = high mutagenicity;
           M = moderate mutagenicity.
                                                                             U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1986/646-116/20798

-------
     C. Castaldini is withAcurex Corp., Mountain View, CA 94039.
     Robert E. Hall is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report consists of two volumes, entitled "Environmental Assess-
       ment of /VO, Control on a Spark-Ignited, Large-Bore, Reciprocating Internal-
       Combustion Engine:"
       "Volume I. Technical Results," (Order No. PB 86-156 809/AS; Cost: $16.95)
       "Volume II. Data Supplement," (Order No. PB 86-156 817/AS; Cost: $16.95)
     The above reports will be available only from: (cost subject to change)
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Research Triangle Park, NC27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
                                                                                          \*>«AXTy  U.S,POSfflGt" i-
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S7-86/002
             0000329   PS
                                             AGENCY

-------