United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-88/002  Apr. 1 988
v>EPA         Project Summary
                   Fundamental Combustion
                   Research  Applied  to  Pollution
                   Formation—Volume  III. Support
                   Studies:  Measurement Studies
                   W. R. Seeker and M. P. Heap
                     This is the third volume in a series
                   documenting research activities con-
                   ducted under the EPA's Fundamental
                   Combustion Research (FCR) program,
                   applied to pollution formation. The FCR
                   program had three major objectives:

                   • To generate an understanding  of
                     combustion behavior necessary to
                     aid in developing control strategies
                     to minimize NOX emissions from
                     stationary sources.
                   • To develop engineering models
                     which would allow effective utiliza-
                     tion of a large body of fundamental
                     information in the development of
                     new NOX control techniques.
                   • To identify critical information
                     necessary for low-NO* combustor
                     development and to generate it in a
                     time  frame which was consistent
                     with the needs of EPA's technology
                     development programs.
                     This Project Summary  was  devel-
                   oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engi-
                   neering Research Laboratory, Research
                   Triangle Park, NC, to announce key
                   findings of the research project that is
                   fully documented in a separate report
                   of the same title (see Project Report
                   ordering information at back).


                   Introduction
                     This report documents findings from
                   a limited number of studies to evaluate
                   measurement techniques. FCR program
                   efforts to evaluate and develop measure-
                   ment techniques were conducted as part
of a support function to the overall FCR
program. An overview of the entire FCR
program content and the objective of the
program's various components are pre-
sented  in Volume I. Volume I also
describes FCR program efforts to quantify
the gas-phase chemistry controlling NOX
formation and destruction during com-
bustion. Volume II is a three-part report
describing studies  related  to various
aspects of the physics and chemistry of
two-phase  systems. Volume Ha ad-
dresses flame combustion  processes,
Volume lib addresses devolatilization and
volatile  reactions,  and Volume Me de-
scribes  studies  of heterogeneous NO
reduction processes. Volume IV docu-
ments FCR program efforts to develop
engineering analysis computer models.
  The prime contractor and EPA's project
officer were responsible for  program
planning, management, and synthesis of
the  overall combined inhouse and sub-
contract program. Approximately 70% of
the program effort involved subcontracts
to a variety of organizations throughout
the world, ensuring that the FCR program
had the benefit of the best scientific
talent available.
  A substantial  fraction of  the experi-
mental studies reported in Volumes I, II,
and III were conducted through subcon-
tracts or were joint efforts involving both
EER  and a subcontractor. Most of the
modelling, however, was performed by
EER directly. Volume III gives results from
three individual  research projects. The
first study reported, performed directly by
EER, evaluated potential errors involved
in the chemiluminescent measurement

-------
of NO in combustion products.  The
second  study,  performed through a
subcontract to the University of Utah,
included  an assessment of the  proce-
dures required to measure nitrogenous
intermediates involved in staged com-
bustion. The final  portion of Volume III
documents results from a joint study
conducted by EER and Spectron  Devel-
opment  Laboratories  to  assess optical
droplet sizing techniques which might be
applied to studies of pollutant formation
in liquid  fuel  spray flames. Each study
is presented as a  separate report with
individual tables of  contents, lists  of
figures, conclusions, and references. The
remainder of this Project Summary pre-
sents brief descriptions of the individual
components comprising Volume III.

Chemiluminescent
Measurement of NO in
Combustion Products
  The measurement of nitric oxide (NO)
concentrations in  combustion products
by chemiluminescence has several
advantages over alternative methods. As
a  result, the Chemiluminescent NO
analyzer  (CLA) has become a standard
instrument for most laboratory and field
emissions tests. CLAs were used by EER
and all FCR program subcontractors for
NOX  measurements  reported in  this
report series. During  the FCR program,
several papers appeared in the literature
questioning the accuracy of CLAs when
calibrated using NO in an N2 background
for the span gas. (The primary concern
was that background  gas composition
affected the NO concentration measure-
ment.) Molecular nitrogen represents the
dominant species in traditional combus-
tion exhaust products, but there are also
substantial  concentrations of other
species (e.g., water vapor and C02). One
paper indicated that the common practice
of neglecting background  gas composi-
tion variation could introduce errors as
large as 28% in  indicated NO concen-
tration. This was an issue of considerable
concern to the  FCR program and to the
EPA. Accordingly, a research project was
initiated with three objectives:

• Assess the  accuracy of commercial
   CLAs measuring  NO in combustion
   products following the calibration and
   operating procedures recommended
   by the instrument manufacturers.

• Examine methods of correcting CLA-
   indicated NO concentrations for the
   effects of background gas composition
   variations.

• Examine methods to improve calibra-
   tion procedures.

  Figure 1  is a simplified schematic of
a CLA NO analyzer.  A flow of ozone is
mixed with the sample gas in the reaction
chamber. The ozone and NO in the sam-
ple gas (or span gas) rapidly react to form
nitrogen dioxide in either an excited state
(NO$) or a ground level state (NO2). The
yield of NO$ is about 10% at ambient
temperatures. The excited molecules can
     decay to ground state giving off light of'
     a  characteristic  frequency (chemilumi-
     nescence) or can collide with any third
     body (M) and  decay to ground  state
     without  chemiluminescence (quench-
     ing). The relative  importance of the
     Chemiluminescent and quenching  reac-
     tions depends upon the temperature, and
     the  amount and type of  molecules
     available for quenching (i.e., the back-
     ground  gas  composition). The  intensity
     of chemiluminescence, measured with a
     photomultiplier tube (PMT),  is  directly
     proportional to NO  concentration. The
     relation between PMT output  and NO
     concentration is determined by calibrat-
     ing  the instrument using a  known
     concentration of NO in a background gas
     to adjust the amplifier gain. A span gas
     which is NO free is used to adjust zero
     offset and to account for PMT dark cur-
     rent effects.
       The previously noted literature reports
     indicating substantial CLA NO measure-
     ment error  were primarily  concerned
     with the third body quenching efficiency
     of major combustion product gases (e.g.,
     H20 and CO2) relative to that of IM2. These
     reports presented experimental evidence
     showing the strong impact of background
     gas  composition on the  quenching
     process.  Background gas  composition
     can  also influence  other  important
     features of  CLA operation.  A potential
     influence of backgorund gas composition
     is its impact on sample gas flow rate to
     the reaction chamber. It is important to
     recognize that the output from the CLA's
             NO + M
 Sample
      Reaction Chamber


         Optical Filter
        Photomultiplier Tube
     Lighttight Housing
                                       Vent
   L
                                                        Oi+Os
 Ozone
Generator
                                Power Supply.
                                  Amplifier,
                                 and Readout
Figure  1.   Chemiluminescent measurement of NO.

                                   2

-------
PMT is actually  proportional to the
number of  NO molecules entering the
reaction chamber,  not  simply the NO
concentration.  For that reason, any
process that impacts the flow rate  of
sample gas to the reaction chamber will
also affect  the NO concentration indi-
cated by the CLA. Commercial  CLAs
typically control flow rates by passing the
sample  gas (and span  gas) through a
capillary and regulating the  capillary
pressure drop. Note,  however, that for
a constant  pressure drop, the flowrate
through a capillary is inversely propor-
tional to the gas viscosity. Variations in
sample gas composition which alter the
average viscosity will result in variation
in sample flowrate and the indicated NO
concentration. This potential source  of
CLA measurement  bias  was not consid-
ered in the above noted reports dealing
with the quenching process. Fortunately,
for  the major non-N2  constituents  of
typical combustion  products, biases due
to quenching and viscosity effects are in
opposite directions.
  To accomplish the program objectives,
two commercially available CLAs were
zeroed and spanned with N2 and  NO in
N2,  respectively,  and  then  used  to
measure known concentrations of NO in
a variety of background  gases. The gas
mixtures were prepared by blending high
purity gases and mixtures of NO in carrier
gases  in a precision  flow metering
system.  The  gas  mixtures simulated
combustion products  from a wide range
of  fuel compositions  and combustor
operating conditions. The NO concentra-
tions indicated by the CLAs were then
compared with the actual NO concentra-
tions to determine the  effects of back-
ground gas composition. Two  commer-
cial CLAs  selected  for evaluation:  a
Beckman Model  951  and a Thermal
Electron Corporation (TECO) Model 10A.
The major distinction between the
instruments  is that the  Beckman  is
designed to operate  with  the reaction
chamber at atmospehric pressure, while
the TECO  utilizes a subatmospheric
pressure (nominally 9  torr1) reaction
chamber. These  pressure  differences
were expected to highlight the influence
of the quenching process on NO mea-
surement.
  The experimental program consisted of
three series of tests. The Series 1 sample
gas consisted of NO in  a background of
N2 and varying percentages of another
gas. Figure 2 illustrates the response of
both instruments to varying (but  large)
concentrations of O2, C02, CO, and CH4
in the background gas. In typical com-
bustion system exhausts, the 02 concen-
tration will be less, than 20% (assuming
combustion in air), the CO  and CH«
concentrations should  be  in  the ppm
range, and the C02 concentration will be
on the order of  10%.  As shown,  the
impact of these sample gases on CLA
operation is to decrease the indicated NO
concentration. The atmospheric pressure
reaction cell of the Beckman instrument
showed a slightly stronger bias.
  Series 2 simulated background gases
that would be produced in actual com-
bustion systems(asopposedto the binary
mixtures  examined in Series  1).  Back-
ground  gas  mixtures  were prepared
simulating the products of complete
combustion  for  a  range  of  fuels  at
variable  excess  air  levels. The  fuels
considered were methane and  pure
carbon,  representing the extremes  in
fuel-carbon/hydrogen ratio. The fuel/air
ratio simulated ranged from stoichiomet-
ric all the way to an  infinite excess air
level. Figures 3A and 3B show the re-
sponse of the TECO and Beckman instru-
ments to sample gases containing 200
ppm NO.  Figure 3C shows the  response
of both instruments to different NO levels
as a function of theoretical air but holding
the fuel  type  constant.  These figures
illustrate that the anticipated error from
the TECO instrument will be less than
5% for all conditions analyzed. For  the
Beckman instrument, the influence of
other background gases was found to be
much stronger, with errors  as large as
11% indicated  in the 100% theoretical
air range.
  The  usual procedure  in  commercial
CLA operation is to draw the sample  gas
through an ice  bath (or through a  dryer)
to remove water from the sample and
to reduce the sample dewpoint to  below
room temperature. As part of Series 2,
experiments were  conducted which
varied the sample dewpoint in the  range
of 275-294 K.  The impact of sample
dewpoint  on indicated NO level was
found to be small for the TECO instru-
ment (1-2%),  but substantial  for  the
Beckman instrument (up to 6%).
  Series 3 evaluated the impact of using
CLAs spanned  on  NO in  N2  to measure
the NO concentration from  combustion
experiments using artificial oxidizers. As
part of the FCR  program  and  EPA's
inhouse research program, experiments
were conducted in which argon  or  an
argon/CO2 mixture replaced molecular
nitrogen  in  the combustion air.  Such
artificial  oxidizer  tests  were used to
evaluate the contribution of fuel bound
nitrogen to exhaust NO.  This particular
combustion  situation was expected to
l.UO
1.02
|
0.95

0.94
0.90
s 0.56
2
0s 0.52
\ 0 75
X U.'O
1 r.os
s
1 /.02
O

51 0.95

0.94

0.90

0.86
0.82
ma
V 1 1 1 1
Oxygen -

B
a S
o o-
Q a
• ••• •

-
I 1 1 I 1

1 1 I 1 1
Carbon Monoxide
~ O A _5L .A ^*

• *

•

• -
• Beckman
O TECO
m
I 11 1 1






















1 1 1 1 1
Carbon Dioxide -
D
D
0 o D-
0
o

0
i i i i 9


Methane -
»_- 	 ., 	 O. 	 n D

• •
9
•
O 0

o
o-
•
1 1 1 1 i
            10    20   30    40    SO    0    10    20    30
                       Concentration of Gas in Mixture (%), Balance Nz
                           40
                                50
'To convert to the metric system 1 torr = 133 Pa
                                        Figure 2.
           Binary background gases on impact of chemiluminescent NO measurement.

                                       3

-------
   o
   6
1 /T3
7.07
0.99 (
0.97
0.95
0.93
0.97
n CO
, \ ,.,.., J
TE CO - 200 ppm
a
: 1 I . «:
. ° o ° .
• «
0 C
0 C«4
	 K
            100     300    500     700

                       Theoretical Air f%)



|
a
o
^
I
1
o






7.03
;.o;
0.99


0.97
0.95

i
0.93

0.97
/-| OQ
U-oj
;
, t 	 JL-,
........ ,f—
Beckman - 200 ppm
.

'
0 o
- •* ffl _
• o ° °
• o • °
o
I

o c
a CHt
• 	 	 . k •
30 300 500 700 7000^ °°
                                              Theoretical Air (%)
                                        I

7.07
0.99
0.97,
0.95
0.93
0.9 1
1
C
0 J 00 ppm Beckmgn
• 200 ppm
O 100 ppm Tf-rn
. 9 200 ppm '£CO
•!"• R
— . ' .
:.-: * °
b Fuel=C
00 300 500 700
, •!
1 '^T .
-
8 •:
i


70001 °°
                                                             Theoretical Air (%)


Figure 3.   Impact of fuel type and excess air level on NO measurement using chemilummescent analysis.
result \n  large instrument  errors since
the anticipated bias from argon quench-
ing effects are in the same direction as
the bias from variation in  sample flow
to the reaction cell. Results from Series
3 are shown in Figure 4 and  clearly
demonstrate the anticipated result. For
the TECO  instrument,  the  indicated
concentration was  low by 14-18%. For
the Beckman instrument, the measure-
ment error is a relatively strong function
of excess air level, but errors as large
as 20% are observed. Based on these
examinations of CLA bias for  argon-
substituted combustion  air, it  is sug-
gested that the CLA response be carefully
calibrated  and experimental  results
corrected for the instrument bias. Alter-
nately, special  calibration gases with
argon/C02 mixtures as the background
gas should be used.
Measurement of Nitrogenous
Intermediates in a Staged-
Combustion System

  A small FCR program subcontract was
issued to the University of Utah to assess
various techniques being used to meas-
ure nitrogenous  intermediates  from
staged combustion processes. The pri-
mary focus of the  study was evaluation
of specific ion electrodes for the meas-
urement of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and
ammonia  (NH3) concentrations gener-
ated in staged combustion flames. Three
important introductory notes are in order.
First, HCN and NH3 are formed as
intermediate species in the process of
converting fuel  bound  nitrogen  into
either NO or N2. These intermediates are
not expected  as  constituents in  the
exhaust gas  of  traditional or staged
combustion processes. The second intro-
ductory note is that this study was not
intended as an exhaustive evaluation of
nitrogenous intermediate measurement
techniques. Within the FCR program and
the combustion research community in
general, specific  ion  electrodes are
widely used to determine the concentra-
tion of HCN and NHa. There was, how-
ever, wide variation in the details of hovt
samples were collected and the proce
dures  used for  sample  analysis. The
study conducted at the University of UtaF
was focused on evaluation of the various
procedures being employed by other FCF
research organizations.  Finally, it shoulc
be  noted  that emphasis is placed or
extracting samples from within the flam<
zone of a  furnace fired with coal  o
residual fuel  oil.  This  is an extreme!'
hostile environment which impacts hov

-------





o
H
                                                                                     Beckman21% Oz/21% CO2/Ar   ,
                              a
                          ir  o
                          11    .
                                                                               8
           100  200 300  400  500
            1000^  oo   100 200  300 400  500

               Theoretical Air f%)
                                                                                                        _L,|V
                                                                                                         /oooM   o
Figure 4.   Influence ofOz/Ar andOz/COz/Ar artificial oxidizers on measurement of NO from combustion tests using chemiluminescent analyzers.
the sampling probes must be designed
and operated if the probe is to survive
mechanically.
  The  study was  performed through
separate  analysis of  NH3 and  HCN
measurement procedures and included
evaluation of sample collection, sample
preparation, and sample analysis.  Spe-
cific ion electrode for NH3 measurement
was evaluated first. The initial portion of
the study centered on procedures for
using the specific  ion  electrode  itself.
Effects of sample solution temperature,
pH effects, and ionic strength effects on
NH3 concentration  measurement were
all evaluated. In general, results from this
evaluation  confirmed the electrode
manufacturer's operating instructions
and suggestions.
  To collect a sample for analysis it is
necessary to drive the NH3 in the sample
gas into solution. Figure 5 illustrates the
probe and sampling system found to be
most appropriate for that purpose. The
top portion of Figure 5 is a schematic
of the spray probe which was used for
furnace sampling at the University of
Utah. The probe body is water-cooled and
of stainless steel to withstand the high
temperature environments from which
sample gases must be extracted. A small
tube is on the centerline of the probe.
Small holes at the end of this tube admit
a  spray of water or other collecting
solution into the sample gas flow. This
spray serves to both cool the sample gas
and  drive the NH3 into  solution. The
combined sample gas and liquid from the
spray are directed to a series of impingers
at the probe outlet. Sampling system
components downstream  of  the impin-
gers measure the sample  gas flow rate.
Extensive evaluations were conducted to
evaluate the influence of  spray compo-
sition, type of bubblers or impingers, type
and quantity of contacting solution in the
impingers, and effects  of sample flow
rate and NH3 concentration in the sample
gas.  These evaluations indicated that
distilled deionized  (DD) water for the
spray collection efficiency of 97% was
achieved (sampling 5 L/min of 550 ppm
NH3, balance N2) with the spray probe
itself. Adding  fritted bubblers on the
probe outlet  increased the collection
efficiency  to 98%.  Changing the spray
and bubbler solution from DD water to
0.1  N  H2SO4  increased the collection
efficiency to 99%.
  The final portion of the ammonia probe
study included assessment of potential
interference effects from other species
in the sample gas.  Strong interferences
were  found for two gases: when the
sample gas contained dimethylamine, a
strong positive interference  was ob-
served, indicating that  the  electrode  is
not totally specific to NH3 but also senses
NH species; and  a strong  negative
interference was found for SOa. Further
investigation indicated that a substantial

-------
                           2.54 cm
                           OD Tube
                           1.91 cm
                           OD Tube
                           1.27cm
                           OD Tube
                           Gas
                         Sample In
                          0.318 OD
                          Tube
                  157.7
                   cm
a ..  ^m^^^ ^
TA
                                                               C_T
                                       Spray Jets
                   Cooling
                    Water
                      Out
                               Cooling
                                Water
                                   In
                                                                   Spray
   u
Gas and
Solution
    Out
                                                                   Solution
                                                                   In
                                              Waterspray Probe
             Spray Pump
                                                          Cooling Coils
                                                            Knockout
                                                          IT Drum
                                                         Glass-Wool
                                                         Filters
                                                          Dessicant
                                                          Dryer
                           Impingers


Figure 5.    Waterspray probe and samplimg system.
                                               Temperature
                                                 Gauge
                                                                                                    Dry Gas Meter
                                                                                      Pressure
                                                                                      Gauge
                                                                                                Sample Pump
                                                                                            To System Exhaust
fraction  (not  quantified) of the  SOs
interference was the result of gas-phase
reactions between NH3 and S02 prior to
the sample  gas  reaching the sampling
probe. The need for further evaluation
of this interference is indicated.
  Evaluation of the HCN measurement
system proceeded similarly to the eval-
uation of the NH3 probe. The specific ion
electrode  evaluation  included assess-
ments of the impacts of solution temper-
ature, pH effects,  and  ionic strength
impacts on the electrode response. As
with the  NH3  electrode,  the cyanide
electrode performs in  much the fashion
indicated  by  the  instrument  manufac-
                                        turer. However, an observed hysteresi:
                                        effect suggested that the cyanide elec
                                        trode be conditioned with a solution o
                                        low cyanide concentration in comparisoi
                                        with the solution  on which  measure
                                        ments are to be made.
                                          The optimal sample collection systen
                                        for  HCN was found to be the  same a

-------
that for the NH3 system shown in Figure
5. A  variety  of  spray solutions and
contacting  solutions in the  impingers
were investigated. Using DD water, 0.1
N H2SO4, and  1.0 M NaOH, all resulted
in HCN collection efficiencies  of only
about 85%. Evaluations of interfering gas
species in the sample flow found that the
only major interference came from  S=.
Addition  of Bi+3 to the impingers was
found effective for removal of both the
S= ion and its interfering effect.
  A final portion of the University of Utah
study reports on experiments to measure
nitrogenous intermediates in a  staged
combustion system. Experiments were
conducted in a refractory tunnel  furnace
and  burned natural  gas doped with
surrogate fuel  nitrogen compounds in a
staged combustion configuration.

Spray Characterization
  An FCR experimental research project
was jointly conducted by EER and Spec-
Iron Development Laboratories (SDL) to
evaluate  three laser-based techniques
for  measuring  characteristics of sprays.
A  number  of  optical  techniques have
been  developed or proposed  which
promise information on spray parame-
ters such as the spatial distribution of
drop size distribution and the velocity of
                     Transmitting Optics
                              various drop size classes.  The three
                              techniques evaluated in this FCR project
                              included processes based on interfer-
                              ometry, holography, and laser diffraction.
                                Interferometry, a point measurement
                              technique, can simultaneously  deter-
                              mine  the diameter and velocity of a
                              droplet passing through the  point sam-
                              pling  volume.  Droplet diameter  and
                              velocity distribution information can be
                              obtained at  a given  probing  location,
                              while spatial distribution of  size distri-
                              bution  and  velocity is obtained by
                              sequentially  examining multiple  loca-
                              tions  in the  spray. Holography provides
                              an  instantaneous, three-dimensional
                              picture  of the  droplet  field and  was
                              included in  the evaluation as a  cross-
                              check for the interferometry and diffrac-
                              tion techniques.  The diffraction  tech-
                              nique examined provided a line-of-sight
                              measurement of  drop size distribution
                              and did not provide  information on
                              droplet velocity. It was included  in the
                              evaluation because the technique rapidly
                              provides processed data and because it
                              had been used for spray nozzle charac-
                              terization in a previous  EPA  study
                              conducted at the International  Flame
                              Research Foundation (IFRF) in IJmuiden,
                              Holland.
                                To  evaluate the measurement  tech-
                              niques, a special  spray  chamber  was
constructed from  a  0.61 m diameter
Plexiglas tube to simulate the geometry
of EPA's firetube package boiler simu-
lator. Commercial spray nozzles could be
located on the chamber centerline, while
an adjustable quantity of air was provided
co-axial to the nozzle. Initial testing was
restricted to a small twin-fluid atomizer
(Sonicore model 052  H) which had been
used in several combustion evaluation
studies. This Sonicore nozzle  had also
been evaluated as part of the previously
noted IFRF spray characterization study.
  The laser interferometry study utilized
optical hardware and signal processing
equipment provided by SDL (see Figure
6). Light from a helium-neon (HeNe) laser
was split into two beams by a diffraction
grating and then crossed within the spray
chamber. At the beam intersection, an
interference fringe  pattern  is  estab-
lished. When a droplet passes through
this probe volume,  light is scattered and
collected on a photomultiplier tube.
Analysis of the resultant electrical signal
provides  information  on the  droplet
diameter and velocity. Data from multiple
droplets passing  through  the probe
volume  are stored on a  computer disk
and analyzed to define  histograms  of
droplet size and velocity.
  The  laser  holography system,  also
provided by SDL, consisted of an HeNe
L-\,
              DC: Diffraction Grating
             LZ, /.»' Transmitting Lenses
             Lt. LS: Collecting Lenses
               M: Mirror
             PMT: Photomultiplier Tube
              PV. Probe Volume
                0: Collection Angle
                                                                                              Collecting Optics
 Figure 6.    Laser interferometry system.

-------
 laser for alignment and a ruby laser to
 take the hologram. The ruby laser beam
 was split into information and reference
 beams. Both  beams were expanded,
 spatially filtered, and collimated. The
 information beam went through the fuel
 spray,  while  the  reference beam
 bypassed the test section. The two beams
 were then mixed  on a holoplate. The
 optical configuration employed produced
 a probe volume on the order of 10 cm3.
 A shutter in front of the holoplate holder
 allowed light to enter only during record-
 ing  and minimized the  influence  of
 extraneous light sources.
  The laser diffraction system employed
 was the Malvern Model 1800 purchased
 by EPA for the previously mentioned IFRF
 study. The basic  measurement system
 consists of an HeNe laser whose beam
 is  expanded to 6.0  mm diameter and
 passed through the spray flow field. Light
 from the beam is diffracted  by  droplets
 in  the spray.  The angle  of diffraction
 depends  on  the  droplet  diameter,
 increasing with decreasing droplet size.
 As illustrated in Figure 7, the diffracted
 light is collected by a Fourier transform
 lens and focused on a 30-ring detector.
 The distribution of light energy across the
 30 rings is read by a minicomputer and
 fit to a Roslin-Rammler distribution. The
 sweep time of the detector  is approxi-
 mately 13 msec. A representative droplet
 size distribution is obtained by averaging
 the  results from  about  100  to 200
 sweeps.
  Figure 8 illustrates typical results from
 the evaluation in a plot of spray weight
 density distribution versus  droplet
 diameter for the three  measurement
 techniques. These data were all collected
 at the same axial location in the spray
 with the same nozzle operating condi-
 tions. The diffraction  and  holography
techniques are in reasonable agreement:
the major source of deviation is attributed
 to  failure  of the holography system  to
 detect droplets smaller than about 15-
 20 Aim in diameter.  Both the diffraction
 and  holography techniques give results
 in marked contrast to the interferometric
technique. This discrepancy is attributed
to  the limited  dynamic range of the
 interferometric technique. The technique
 is capable of measuring droplets within
 only  a  1  decade variation range  in
diameter.  As noted  in the  figure, the
 diffraction technique  detected droplets
 ranging from <10 to >200//m diameter.
The interferometer tests were conducted
to  measure droplets in the range  of
 approximately  10-100 /urn. Centering  of
the dynamic range  is adjustable, but
                                    8
                                              Fourier
                                             Transform
                                               Lens
                                                          Detector
                     Beam
                   Expander
                                                           Minicomputer
                                                         Teletype
Figure 7.   Laser diffraction diagnostic technique.
        0.5
                                               I     I      I     I     I
        0.2
        0.1
Figure 8.
0    20     40   60    80    100  120    140    160  180   200  220

                           Diameter, ^m


 Interferometric, diffraction, and holography data—weight density distribution for
 Sonicore spray nozzle.
biasing  resulting  from  the  limited
dynamic  range appears to be a major
drawbacktothetechnique.lt is important
to note that SDL felt that many of the
apparent shortcomings of the interfer-
ometer technique were a matter of data
interpretation. An appendix in the report
documents the evaluation position taken
by SDL.

-------
W. Seeker and M. Heap are with Energy and Environmental Research Corp..
  Irvine, CA 92718.
W. Steven Lanier is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Fundamental Combustion Research Applied to
  Pollution Formation:  Volume III. Support Studies: Measurement Studies,"
  (Order No. PB 88-168 968/AS; Cost: $38.95.  subject to change) will be
  available only from:
       National Technical Information Service
       5285 Port Royal Road
       Springfield, VA 22161
       Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
       Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                                    *U.S.Government Printing Office: 1988 — 548-158/67096

-------
                                                      m  ~p O
                                                      -n  * :£
                                                      >  3z?

                                                      a  ^-
                                                      §  o?
                                                                      I)
                                                                      O
                                                       oo
                                                       03
                                                       O
                                                       o
                                                          =• to
                                                          Is
                                                          c
                                                          en
                                                          at
                                                          u
OIV30C  O
xw*m    O
MOOtO  O
O  M    O
                                                                      O

                                                                      5
                                                                      o

                                                                      5'
                                                                      3
                                                                      Q)
                                                                      01
                                                                      NJ
                                                                      O>
                                                                      00
oo  <  •«
  rnuiM
  »  30
  »!"•    -fl
  OOBJO
  3Q90O
    30 rn
     o
  tn  z
o
Ch
o
     m

                                                                a, r O rn   :
                                                                m ? n z.   (
                                                               CD


                                                               CD

                                                               tn
                                                                § (• S

-------