United States Environmental Protection Agency Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park NC 27711 Research and Development EPA/600/S7-88/012 Nov. 1988 c/EPA Project Summary Cost of Controlling Directly Emitted Acidic Emissions from Major Industrial Sources T.E. Emmel, J.T. Waddell, and R.C. Adams Stationary U.S. sources, each of which as a group emits over 4,500 Mg (5000 tons) or more of acidic material (e.g., acid sulfates, HCI, HF) per year, include: utility and industrial boilers, Glaus sulfur recovery plants, catalytic cracking units, primary copper smelters, coke oven plants, primary aluminum smelters, and municipal solid waste incinerators. Utility and industrial boilers are by far the largest sources, emitting about 760,000 Mg (830,000 tons) and 180,000-250,000 Mg (200,000-275,000 tons) of acidic material per year, respectively. Using a model plant approach, estimates were made of costs for retrofitting selected control systems to these plants. Cost- effectiveness (defined as the unit annual cost for removal of the acidic materials) of each control system was calculated based on the anticipated performance of the system. If SO2 is simultaneously emitted with the acidic materials, con- trols were selected which removed both SO2 and the acidic materials. Cost- effectiveness was considerably better for the combined (SO2 + acidic material) removal systems. For example, a limestone wet scrubber on a 600 MW, high-sulfur-coal-fired utility boiler was estimated to have a cost-effectiveness of $65,000/Mg ($59,000/ton) for acid sulfates, HCI, and HF, but a combined (SO2 + acidic material) cost effec- tiveness of $1100/Mg ($1000/ton). Be- cause of a need for performance data on acidic emissions control systems, it would be desirable if research could be conducted on removal of acid sulfates and nitrates by existing gaseous and par- ticulate control systems. This Project Summary was developed by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, to announce key findings of the research project that is fully documented in a separate report of the same title (see Project Report ordering information at back). Introduction The Acid Precipitation Act of 1980 established an Interagency Task Force to develop a comprehensive research pro- gram for investigation of acid precipitation issues. The National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP) was subse- quently established to develop the necessary data and provide a framework for policy recommendations in regard to acid precipitation. One aspect of the overall acid deposition issue is to understand the role and significance of direct emissions of acidic materials. As such, it is necessary to identify the major industrial sources of direct emissions of acidic material (e.g., sulfates, chlorides) and to evaluate the con- trol of these materials. In addition, it is im- portant to know if the most cost-effective methods for reducing acidic emissions dif- fer from those for controlling acid deposi- tion precursors (SO2> NOX, and VOC). Accordingly, the objectives of this study were: 1) to identify and characterize sta- tionary combustion and industrial sources of directly emitted acidic materials in the U.S.; 2) to evaluate the technical feasibility of control techniques for these sources; and 3) to estimate the costs of applying these control technologies. This assessment was conducted by reviewing and analyzing ex- isting data, including the preliminary control strategies evaluated by the In- teragency Task Force. The potential for emissions from transportation sources was not examined in this study. ------- Results of the study can be used to evaluate the merits of controlling directly emitted acidic materials as part of a policy evaluation of overall acid deposition con- trol strategies. For example, if it were deter- mined that (for a region) local emissions of directly emitted acid materials were more significant than long range precursor emit- ters, the information in this report could be used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of controlling local sources of directly emitted acidic materials versus sources of long range precursor emissions. Methodology To identify and characterize sources of directly emitted acidic materials, national acidic materials emissions of all stationary combustion and industrial sources were identiied by means of a literature search. Model units were then developed for sources that emit 4,500 Mg (5,000 tons) or more of acidic material per year. The model units were used as bases for establishing control techniques and for determining the technical feasibility of candidate conven- tional control techniques. The cost of retrofit controls for the model units was estimated, and cost-effectiveness values were deter- mined. The cost-effectiveness of acidic materials control was compared with the cost-effectiveness where applicable of SO2 which is co-emitted with acidic materials. Additionally, promising research and development activities relevant to acid materials control were also examined. Results and Recommendations The major combustion and industrial sources of directly emitted acidic materials that were identified during this study are presented in Table 1. For most source categories, emissions were estimated using emissions factors and combustion and process capacities found in the litera- ture. Utility and industrial boilers are by far the largest acidic emissions sources in the U.S., producing about 760,000 Mg (830,000 tons) and 180,000-250,000 Mg (200,000-275,000 tons) of acidic material emissions per year, respectively. It was also estimated that emissions of directly emit- ted acidic materials represent only 2% of the annual emissions of SO2, NOX, and VOC (which are acid precipitation precur- sors) from stationary sources. Based on information obtained in the literature, model plants, including the most applicable acidic material controls, were developed for sources that emit over 4,500 Mg (5,000 tons) of acidic material per year. This cutoff point allowed the project to focus on source categories with the greatest emissions. The major sources considered include utility and industrial boilers, Claus sulfur recovery plants, catalytic cracking units, primary copper smelters, coke oven plants, primary aluminum smelters, and municipal solid waste incinerators. Although Kraft pulp mills, gypsum plants, and cement plants are large sulfate emis- sions sources, they were not analyzed fur- ther because the compounds emitted are alkaline or pH neutral. In addition, gypsum ponds were identified as a source category emitting large amounts of HF. However, HF emissions from gypsum ponds are reduced by water treatment methods, whereas this study focused primarily on controls which treat acidic gases. Thus, no further analysis was attempted. Little performance data is available con- cerning the control of acidic emissions by currently operating control systems. Therefore, the systems chosen for model unit development are generally those which are demonstrated for control of SO2 and NOX and provide the greatest potential for control of acidic material emissions. Cost analyses were performed to estimate the costs required for retrofitting the selected control systems to model plants. Table 2 summarizes the control systems analyzed for each significant source category and their respective cost- effectiveness. Cost-effectivenes is defined as the unit annual cost for removing the acidic materials. If SO2 is present in the emission stream, controls were selected for concurrent removal of SO2 and the acidic materials. Typically, the volume of SO2 is quite large compared to that of acidic materials. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is considerably improved if calculated for the combined removal of acidic materials and SO2. The combined cost-effectiveness values are included in Table. 2. The greatest obstacle in this study was the lack of available performance data for acidic emissions control systems. No infor- mation was available concerning the con- trol of acid nitrates. All test data for remov- ing acid sulfates were presented in terms of H2SO4 mist control and show a wide range of removal efficiencies. Therefore, it would be desirable if research could be directed toward quantitating the acid sulfate and acid nitrate control performances of ex- isting applicable gaseous and paniculate controls. While data for HCI and HF removal are also lacking, the need for research in this area is not urgent, because HCI and HF have high affinities to the alkaline solutions commonly used by FGD systems and, as indicated by the limited test data, removal is expected to be high. The technologies identified as being most applicable to reducing directly emit- ted acidic materials are wet/dry scrubbing techniques. Conventional electrostatic precipitators and fabric filters are not as ef- fective because acidic material frequently forms downstream of where these devices are typically located. For this reason, the most cost-effective control devices for sulfates, fluorides, and chloride are the same as would be employed for SO2. Con- ventional combustion modification techni- ques, used to control NOX emissions from boilers, were identified as the best commer- cially available methods for reducing nitrate emissions. ------- Table 1. National Emissions Source Category Utility Boilers Coal Residual Oil Distillate Oil Industrial Boilers Coal Residual Oil Distillate Oil Municipal Solid Waste Catalytic Cracking Primary Copper Primary Aluminum Gypsum Ponds Claus Plants Coke Ovens Proplyene Oxide Manufacturing Residential Boilers Sulfuric Acid Plants Phosphoric Acid Plants Triple Superphosphate Manufacturing Primary Zinc Diammonium Phosphate Manufacturing HF Manufacturing Estimates for Identified Source Categories Acid Sulfate Emissions Nitrate Emissions (703 Mg/yr) (103 Mg/yr 103 tons/yr) 103 tons/yr) 107(117) 64(70) 25 (28) 3.6 (4) 20-81 (25-89) 32 (35) 5-10.4 (5.5-11.5) 27 (30) 11.3(12.5) 8.6-10.4 (9.5-11.5) 0.18-0.41 (0.2-0.45) 5.4 (6) 5 (5.5) 1.8 (2) 0.2 (0.25) Tattle 2. Summary of Controls Analyzed and Cost-Effectiveness Source Category/ Fuel Process Capacity Type" Control Industrial Boilers'' 30 5 GJ/hr (3O MMBtu/hr) HCI Emissions HF Emissions Total Emissions Year (103 Mg/yr) (10* Mg/yr) (103 Mg/yr) Data 103 tons/yr) 103 tons/yr) 103 tons/yr) Reported 496(546) 60(66) 756(831) 1980/1982 88 (96) 10.6(11.5) 182-248(203-273) 1980/1982 20 (22) 20 (22) — 11.3(12.5) 1983 8.6-10.4 (9.5-11.5) 1984 5.9(6.5) 6.1-6.3(6.7-7) 1983 5.9 (6.5) 5.9 (6.5) 1980 5.4 (6) 1980 5 (5.5) 1983 2.7-4.1(3-4.5) 2.7-4.1(3-4.5) 1980 2.7(3) 0.2(0.25) 2.9(3.25) 1974 1.8 (2) 1982 0.14(0.15) 0.14(0.15) 1980 0.18(0.2) 0.18(0.2) 1980 0.2 (0.25) 1983 0.2 (0.25) 0.2 (0.25) 1980 0.01-1.2 (0.01-1.35) 0.01-1.2 (0.01-1.35) 1980 Cost-Effectiveness of Removal Acidic Species Acidic Material Acidic Material + SO2 Controlled $/Mg ($/ton) $/Mg ($/ton) HSC Sodium-Based Scrubber SuHates, HCI, HF 39,300 (35,700) 810 (740) LSC 24,400 (22,200) 2,640 (2,400) DO Sulfates 359,000 (327,000) 4,890 (4,440) RO 492,800 (448,000) 1,110 (1,010) HSC Dual Alkali Scrubber LSC DO RO HSC Lime Spray Dryer LSC DO RO Sulfates, HCI, HF 86,100 (78,300) 1,770 (1.610) 66,000 (60,000) 7,130 (6,480) Sulfates 999,000 (908,000) 13,600 (12,360) 1,200,000 (1,090,000) 2,720 (2,470) SuHates, HCI, HF 72,600 (66,000) 1,910 (1,730) 59,900 (54,400) 7,930 (7,210) Sulfates 626,000 (569,000) 15,400 (14,000) 704,000 (640,000) 2,920 (2,660) ------- Table 2. (Continued) Source Category/ Process Capacity 406 GJ/hr (400 MMBtu/hr) Utility Boiler" 2,0311 GJ/hr (2,000 MMBtu/hr) 5,078 GJ/hr (5,000 MMBtu/hr) Cost-Effectiveness of Removal Fuel Typ^ HSC LSC DO RO HSC LSC DO RO HSC LSC DO RO HSC LSC Coal HSC LSC RO HSC LSC HSC LSC Coal Coal Oil Coal Oil HSC LSC RO HSC LSC HSC LSC Coal Coal Oil Coal Oil Control Sodium-Based Scrubber Dual Alkali Scrubber Lime Spray Dryer Low Excess Air Overfire Air Limestone Wet Scrubber Wellman-Lord System Lime Spray Dryer Low A/0* Burners Low Excess Air Overfire Air Limestone Wet Scrubber Wellman-Lord System Lime Spray Dryer Low A/Ox Burners Low Excess Air Overfire Air Acidic Species Controlled Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates A/O/ A/0/ Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates, HCI, HF A/0/ A/0/ A/O/ Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates Sulfates, HCI, HF Sulfates, HCI, HF WO/ A/0/ A/O/ Acidic Material Acidic Material + SO2 $/Mg ($fton) $/Mg (Won) 18,900 7,000 89,000 200,000 20,600 11,400 156,000 249,000 21,700 14,300 119,000 172,000 132 9 112 64,700 52,600 291,000 94,600 62,800 62,100 47,300 123 7 2 96 131 45,700 37,600 229,000 74,300 49,400 48,000 35,300 71 3 1 56 83 (17,200) (6,300) (81,000) (182,000) (18,700) (10,300) (142,000) (226,000) (19,800) (13,000) (108,000) (156,000) (120) (8) (102) (58,800) (47,800) (264,600) (86,000) (57, 100) (56,500) (43,000) (112) (6) (2) (87) (119) (41,600) (34,200) (208,000) (67,600) (44,900) (43,600) (32,000) (64) (3) (1) (51) (75) 390 750 1,180 450 420 1,220 2,060 560 560 1,810 2,870 710 1,130 4,960 2,350 1,660 5,930 1,140 4,650 800 3,550 1,850 1,300 4,670 880 3,460 (350) (680) (1,070) (410) (380) (1,110) (1,870) (510) (510) (1,650) (2,610) (640) (1,030) (4,510) (2,140) (1,510) (5,390) (1,040) (4,230) (730) (3,230) (1,680) (1, 190) (4,240) (800) (3,150) C/aus Plants 10 Mg/day (11 tons/day) 100 Mg/day (110 tons/day) 250 Mg/day (275 tons/day) Amine Tail Gas Treatment Sulfates 242,800 (220,300) 2,420 (2,200) 77,200 (70,000) 770 (700) 54,900 (49,800) 550 (500) ------- Table 2. (Continued) Cost-Effectiveness of Removal Source Category/ Process Capacity Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units 2,500 mVsd (15,725 bbl/sdf 8,000 m3/sd (50,320 bbl/sdjf Primary Copper Smelters 115,000 Mg/yr (127,000 tons/yr) Coke Oven Plants 2000 Mg/day (220 tons/day) 6000 Mg/day (6600 tons/day) Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) 380 Mg/day (420 tons/day) 730 Mg/day (800 tons/day) Fuel Acidic Species Acidic Material Acidic Material + SOj Type3 Control Controlled $/Mg ($/ton) $/Mg ($/ton) ISF" Sodium-Based Scrubber9 Sutfates 93,640 HSP* 63,450 ISFd 62,580 HSP* 47,830 Sulfuric Acid Plant Sulfates 9,800 Vacuum Carbonate System Sulfates 11,700 6,900 MSW Sodium-Based Scrubbed HCL 1,900 MSW 1,480 (84,950) (57,560) (56,770) (43,390) (8,900) (10,600) (6,300) (1,730) (1,340) 1,090 740 730 560 130 950 570 1,020 970 (990) (670) (660) (510) (120) (870) (520) (1,120) (880) *HSC = high-sulfur coal; LSC = low-sulfur coal; DO = distillate oil; RO = residual oil. "Boiler capacities presented in terms of heat input. °No emissions data, specifically in terms of acid nitrate emissions, were available. Thus, all cost-effectiveness results are given in terms of controlling NOX emissions. "Catalytic cracking unit feed rather than fuel. ISF = intermediate-sulfur feed (1.5 wt. % S); HSF = high-sulfur feed (3.5 wt. % S). "High energy venturi scrubber using soda-ash-based scrubbing liquor. 'Single stage acid plant. ^Employs caustic-soda-based scrubbing liquor. hExcludes benefits of concurrent SO2 reductions. 'm3/sd: cubic meter per stream day bbl/sd: barrel per stream day. T. £. Emmel, J. T. Waddell, and R. C. Adams are with Radian Corporation, Research Triangle Park. NC 27709. Julian W. Jones is the EPA Project Officer (see below). The complete report, entitled "Cost of Controllling Directly Emitted Acidic Emissions from Major Industrial Sources," (Order No. PB 88-234 190/AS; Cost: $19.95, subject to change) will be available only from: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-487-4650 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at: Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park. NC 27711 ------- |