United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency	
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                  Research and Development
EPA/600/S9-88/026 Oct. 1989
c/EPA         Project Summary
                   Proceedings:  1987 Joint
                   Symposium  on  Stationary
                   Combustion NOX Control,
                   New Orleans,  LA, March  1987
                   B. B. Emmel, Compiler
                    The two-volume proceedings docu-
                  ment the 1987 Joint (EPA and EPRI)
                  Symposium on Stationary  Combus-
                  tion NOX Control, held March 23-26,
                  1987, in New Orleans, LA. The papers
                  discuss: low-NOx combustion devel-
                  opments (e.g., reburning and burner
                  design modifications); coal-, oil-, and
                  gas-fired boiler applications; flue gas
                  treatment processes;  fundamental
                  combustion studies; and  Industrial
                  and commercial  applications. Also
                  presented were manufacturers' up-
                  dates of commercially available tech-
                  nology  and an overview of environ-
                  mental issues involving NOX control.
                    This Protect Summary was devel-
                  oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engi-
                  neering Research Laboratory, Re-
                  search Triangle Park, NC, to  announce
                  key findings of the research project
                  that Is fully  documented In  two
                  separate volumes of the same title
                  (see Project Report ordering informa-
                  tion at back).

                  Introduction
                    The 1987 Joint Symposium  on Station-
                  ary  Combustion NOX (nitrogen oxides)
                  Control was held March 23-26, 1987, in
                  New Orleans, LA. The symposium, jointly
                  sponsored by  EPRI and EPA, was the
                  fourth of its kind devoted solely to the
                  discussion of the control of  NOX emis-
                  sions from stationary sources. Topics dis-
                  cussed  included Iow-N0x combustion
                  developments (e.g., reburning  and burner
                  design modifications), coal-, oil-, and gas-
                  fired boiler applications, flue  gas treat-
                  ment processes, fundamental combustion
studies, and industrial and commercial
applications. Also presented were manu-
facturers'  updates  of commercially
available technology and an overview of
environmental issues involving NOX con-
trol.
  The  4-day meeting was attended by
persons from 14 nations. Forty-nine pa-
pers were  presented by EPRI and EPA
staff members, utility company represen-
tatives, boiler and related equipment
manufacturers, research  and develop-
ment groups, and university representa-
tives.
  The  Proceedings are in two volumes.
Volume 1 contains papers from:
• Session I.   Background and
            Environmental Issues
• Session II.   Low-NOx Combustion
            Development
• Session III:  Manufacturers' Update of
            Commercially Available
            Technology
• Session IV:  Coal-Fired Boiler
            Applications
Volume 2 contains papers from:
• Session Va:  Flue Gas Treatment
• Session Vb:  Fundamental
            Combustion Studies
• Session VI:  Cyclone-Fired Boilers
• Session Vila: Oil- and Gas-Fired
            Boilers
• Session Vllb: Industrial and
            Commercial Applications
  The  remainder of this Summary con-
sists of abstracts of the 49 technical
papers presented at the symposium. To
conserve space, authors' addresses are

-------
listed  alphabetically at the end  of  the
Summary,  rather  than  before  each
abstract.

Volume 1

Session I: Background and
Environmental Issues
The New Environmental Agenda
and the Coming Commitment to
NOX Control

Richard E. Ayers
  As the recent ideological approach to
environmental problems wanes,  a new
environmental agenda for the remainder
of this century is emerging. Controlling
NOX emissions from stationary  sources
— a pollutant with serious effects  on
public health, environmental integrity, and
esthetic experience  —  is  part  of this
agenda. Development of new technology
is welcome. But political leaders must not
be permitted to use technological  change
as an  excuse for avoiding the  use  of
existing NOX control technologies now.


Decline of Boreal Montane
Forest Ecosystems in Central
Europe and the Eastern North
America—Links to Air Pollution
and the Deposition of Nitrogen
Compounds

Robert I. Bruck
  Recently   presented   evidence  of
anomalous growth declines and dieback
of eastern forests has captured  public
concern and  strengthened  the  call to
resolve the longstanding question of the
role  of atmospheric deposition  in the
decline  of forest trees.  This  paper
summarizes recent evidence relevant to
determining if there are effects of atmos-
pheric deposition on  forests  of the
eastern U.S.  A scenario might  involve
various forms of  concentrated pollution
being  deposited  via  cloud deposition,
causing above- and  below-ground nutri-
ent  and  microbial imbalances or direct
physiological  aberrations to spruce and
fir  trees.  These  chronic perturbations
could lead to  a predisposition of the eco-
system, to  the effects  of many indigen-
ous pathogens and insects, and/or weak-
en the trees'  resistance to  the effects of
severe climate. Continued research to in-
tegrate the findings of  long term studies
with relevant atmospheric monitoring data
will create a clearer picture of the poten-
tial of atmospheric pollution to affect U.S.
forest resources.
An Overview of Environmental
Issues Related to Nitrogen
Oxides in the Atmosphere

Charles Hakkarinen
  Atmospheric NOX  compounds, includ-
ing N20, NO, and NO2, have been impli-
cated in a  variety  of  environmental
effects, from both their direct emission to
the atmosphere and  their role in the for-
mation of secondary compounds, such as
ozone and nitric acid. High temperature
fossil fuel  combustion  is a  principal
source of  atmospheric  NOX emissions,
hence the electric utility industry  has a
strong interest in understanding their en-
vironmental fate. This paper is an  over-
view of the  current  state of  scientific
knowledge on the transport, conversion,
and fate of NOX compounds in the atmos-
phere. Emphasis will be given to: the re-
lationship between NCyozone and effects
on  human health; the role of nitrogen
compounds/ozone  in the  perceived de-
cline of some North American forests; the
contribution of nitrogen compounds to the
formation of acidic precipitation; and the
role  of NOX (principally, N20) in  regu-
lating global  climate (the "greenhouse
effect") and  influencing the stratospheric
ozone layer (the "polar ozone hole"). The
paper summarizes major research under-
way  at  EPRI  and elsewhere  that
addresses environmental  issues  related
to NOX.


The Role of Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
in Global Climate Change and
Stratospheric Ozone Depletion

Dennis A. Tirpak
  Several  recently  completed  scientific
assessments have  concluded  that there
is a significant potential for global atmos-
pheric change  — climate change and
stratospheric ozone depletion — to occur
in the next few decades.  N2O is a critical
element in  both  issues. Although the
problem of  global  climate change was
once synonymous  with  COg, there  is
growing recognition  of the role of other
trace gases. Chlorofluorocarbons,  N2O,
methane,  and other trace  gases now
account for  roughly half of the warming
from  greenhouse  gases  in  the atmos-
phere, and by the year 2030 may lead to
twice as  much warming as from  C02
alone. The U.S. Congress has asked the
U.S. EPA to prepare a report on  policy
options to stabilize these trace gas con-
centrations. This paper will evaluate  the
role of NO2 in global climate change anc
stratospheric ozone  depletion.  It wil
summarize trends in N2O concentrations
review our understanding of current an<
projected emission sources and emissio
factors, discuss the twin issues of climat
change  and  ozone depletion,  an
recommend topics for further study.


Overview of Recent Developmer
in NOX Control in Europe

O. Rentz and R.  Leibfritz
  Based on the emission control legist
tion in some  European countries, rece
developments are presented leading
the current status of NOX abatement tec
nologies and  their application to static
ary sources (power plants and industi
processes). The state of  DeNOx imp
mentation in  Europe  in the field  of  (
mary  and secondary  NOX emission a
trol is outlined. This includes informat
on initial status at both full-scale and p
plants, available and applied control te
nologies, transfer problems with regar<
site specific conditions, advance prob
solutions,  and state  of commission
The future application of DeNOK tech
ogies to industrial processes is  bri
outlined.  Investment and cost figures
disclosed.

Session H: Low-NOx Combusi
Development


Large Scale  Testing and
Development of the R&W Low
NOX Burner

M. J. Clark, A. D. LaRue, A. D. L
and D. Eskinazi
  Due to environmental concerns,
fuel  power  plants built  prior to
Source  Performance Standards (f>
may  be  required to  reduce NOX
sions. A large segment of these uni
equipped with  cell burners whic
producing relatively high  NOX em
in the  1.0  to  1.8 lb/1Q6 Btu  i
Babcock & Wilcox and EPRI have
oped a low NOX burner that is c
retrofittable  to  cell  burner  units
paper describes the  continued d<
ment of  this  new burner. Results
cent  pilot combustion tests  (100
Btu/hr) conducted at EPA's Large
tube  Simulator (LWS) agree w€
prior smaller-scale  pilot  perfori
NOX  reductions were typically  !

-------
while achieving combustion efficiency of
 3.5%  in the test furnace. A full scale
LOW  NOX Cell was  installed  at Dayton
Power and Light's Stuart Station and  has
been in operation since March 1985. The
Low NOX Cell retrofit involves near-burner
coal  piping  operation and  mechanical
reliability has been  demonstrated  over a
2-year period. A full scale retrofit demon-
stration  is  planned  to confirm the com-
mercial  viability of  this burner in a  full
scale retrofit.
Low NOX Developments on an
Integrated Combustion and
Environmental Test Facility

J. Vatsky and R. McMillan
  A test facility, equipped for  a wide
range of combustion and emission-con-
trol related testing, has been in operation
 or about 18 months, firing a wide variety
of pulverized fuels,  from  subbituminous
coals to very low volatile fuels such  as
 jetroleum coke. Initially, an extensive test
 jrogram was performed with both petrol-
 >um  coke and  bituminous coal  with  an
 irch-fired furnace  configuration.  More
 •ecently, testing has  begun with  a two-
 jurner  high  horizontally fired  configura-
 ion.  Although  these programs  were
 esigned to evaluate NOX emissions, and
 evels of about 0.15 lb/106 Btu have been
 ibtained,  the Combustion  and Environ-
 mental  Test Facility (CETF)  is  also
 lesigned to facilitate testing of SO2 con-
 rol systems. This  paper describes  the
 DETF and summarizes initial results  ob-
 ained from both the arch- and horizon-
 ally fired modes.


 Development of Overfire Air
 Design Guidelines for  Front-Fired
 toilers

 tobert A. Lisauskas, Claire E.
 rtcHale, Rui Afonso, and  David
 •skinazi
  Experimental flow model data and
  ichnical  and economic studies have
 een used to develop design guidelines
 >r overfire air  (OFA) NOX control sys-
  ms. Conventional and novel  OFA con-
  jurations were investigated in  a 1/12-
  :ale furnace model using  detailed tem-
  »rature and velocity maps to  quantify
  rerfire  air injection  and  mixing. Data
  lalyses focused on  translating the flow
  odel test results into practical  designs
  r front-fired utility boilers.  Based on the
  perimental  results,  the  feasibility  of
  Irofitting new OFA configurations on a
specific utility boiler was examined.  The
results for several test configurations are
used to develop preliminary OFA design
guidelines  for  front-fired  boilers.  For
traditional design configurations with  one
OFA  port  located  over  each  burner
column, the best mixing occurs  at an
injection to furnace velocity ratio of  4 to
6. A  significant improvement  in  upper
furnace mixing  can  be  achieved  by
adding wing OFA ports and biasing the
air flow and velocity  from  the  center to
the wing ports.


Furnace Design and Application
on Low NOX Pulverized Coal
Combustion

Takashi Kiga, Shigehiro Miyamae,
Keiji Makino, and Hiroshige Ikebe
  Coal properties  such as  fuel ratio  and
fuel nitrogen are generally  well-known to
affect NOX emission.  We  have already
developed  a  low  NOX pulverized coal
burner which gives 150 ppm  of  NOX or
less  for Japanese domestic  coal  with
conventional staged firing; however, most
of various  kinds of  imported  coals
ensured significantly  higher NOX  emis-
sion  with a conventional furnace. There-
fore, we attempted to develop a low  NOX
furnace, applying  the INPACT  method,
according  to  results  of fundamental  re-
search.  Applying  this method  to  a  600
MW utility  boiler, we  obtained low  NOX
emission of less  than 150 ppm  of the
guarantee value for coals ranked from 1.5
to 2.2 as fuel ratio.  A remarkable  NOX
reduction of less than  100  ppm was  also
obtained.  This paper introduces  the
fundamental furnace design concept and
its application results.
Gas Reburning-Sorbent
Injection—A Combined NOX/SOX
Control Technology

W. Bartok, B. A. Folsom, and F. R.
Kurzynske
  Gas Reburning-Sorbent  Injection (GR-
Sl) involves co-firing pulverized coal with
natural gas in combination with  sorbent
injection and/or coal cleaning to allow for
cost  effective reduction  of  acid  rain
precursor emissions (NOX and SOX) from
pre-NSPS coal-fired utility boilers.  This
would  provide the utility  industry  with
flexibility  in  fuel  selection to  satisfy
potential acid rain control legislation.  This
paper describes  a demonstration project
which will be cooperatively funded by the
Department of Energy, the Gas Research
Institute  and  the  State  of Illinois
Department  of Energy  and  Natural
Resources,  to  demonstrate  GR-SI  on
three  coal-fired utility boilers in Illinois.
GR-SI will be applied to one each of wall,
corner, and  cyclone fired  boilers with
overall reduction targets of 60% in NOX
and 20% in SOX emissions. The overview
of the planned demonstration project will
be discussed, including design consider-
ations and economic projections for GR-
SI applications.


Pilot Scale Studies on the
Application of Reburning for NOX
Control

J. M. McCarthy, S. L. Chen, W.  R.
Seeker, and D. W. Pershing
  This paper describes a pilot scale ex-
perimental study which addressed para-
metric and mixing  effects of the reburn-
ing  process,  an in-furnace NOX reduction
technology,  and provides  scaling infor-
mation and  design  and operation
guidelines for  application  of reburning
under  a  wide  variety of conditions  for
coal-  and oil-fired  boilers. The results
demonstrate the potential of reburning for
NOX reduction,  and indicate that  impor-
tant  parameters include: primary zone
NOX level; primary  zone burnout; reburn-
ing  zone time, temperature, and stoichio-
metry; and  reburning  coal  transport
medium. Rapid dispersion of the reburn-
ing  fuel is desirable for  primary NOX
incineration  but can lead  to  an overall
decrease  in  efficiency if the  reburning
fuel contains fuel nitrogen and is carried
by an oxygen-rich  medium. Recirculated
flue  gas is  the optimal reburning coal
transport  medium,  but efficient NOX
reduction with  air  transport  can  be
achieved if  higher reburning  fuel ratios
and optimal  reburning mixing  rates are
employed. Natural  gas is more effective
than either coal or  heavy fuel oil  for
reburning, especially at low primary NOX
concentrations.  Reburning  with coal or
natural gas  has little adverse  affect  on
burnout performance. Comparison of pilot
scale results and bench scale data shows
that parametric effects are independent
of scale  and that  a 50%  reduction in
emissions is achieved  with  20% coal
reburning at normal primary NOX levels.


Reburning with Low and Medium
Btu Gases

S. J. Bortz and G. R. Often
  Experiments have been conducted in a
0.5  x 106 Btu/hr test furnace to assess

-------
the effectiveness of low and medium Btu
gases as returning  fuels. These fuels,
produced by coal gasification, have only
trace  amounts  of hydrocarbons;  the
combustion fraction is mainly H2 and CO.
Situations where  gasification fuels may
be of interest for reburning would  be
cyclone combustors which used crushed
coal as a fuel, or boilers where there is
insufficient residence time for  reburning
with coal. The experimental results show
that the gasification fuels can reduce NOX
created in the primary flame although not
as effectively  as  hydrocarbon  fuels.
Typically, the gasification fuels gave 20-
30% reduction  of primary zone NOX
compared to 60-70% for natural gas. If
the primary zone  NOX  emissions are
controlled by reducing the primary zone
stoichiometry to between  1.0 and 1.05,
60% overall NOX  reduction (compared to
an uncontrolled flame) can be achieved
with  15-20% use  of simulated Lurgi
reburning fuel.  Under the Same  condi-
tions,  nearly 80% overall NOX reduction
was achieved with natural gas reburning.


Session ///: Manufacturers'
Update of Commercially
Available Technology
1987 Update on NOX Emissions
Control Technologies at
Combustion Engineering

M. S. McCartney, A. Kokkinos, R. D.
Lewis, T. D. Hellewell, and M. B.
Cohen
  As the owners  and operators of fossil
fuel steam generators plan for the 1990s
new emphasis is being placed on the
control of NOX emissions. This emphasis
is the result  of a  resurgence in  the
concern, both domestically and inter-
nationally,  for the effects that NOX
emissions may have on the environment.
At Combustion Engineering (CE), work is
continuously underway to support these
owners and  operators. As shown in
previous Joint NOX Control Symposia, CE
has a diverse array of NOX Reduction
Technologies  available to address a
range of possible reductions dictated by
future  regulations.  These  technologies
have been developed by CE and Mitsu-
bishi Heavy Industries  (MHI); MHI-devel-
oped technologies have been licensed to
CE. A synopsis  of each of these tech-
nologies and the application and oper-
ating  experience related to them  is
presented here.


Update of NOX Control
Technologies at Riley Stoker

C. E. McHale and R. A. Lisauskas
  Recent design  and  operating exper-
ience with Riley  Stoker low-NOx  com-
bustion systems in pilot scale and com-
mercial furnaces is reviewed. The perfor-
mance of several commercial Iow-N0x
burner installations in  wall- and Turbo-
fired furnaces is described. Both emis-
sions  reductions from uncontrolled levels
and  the impact of the  combustion
process modifications on furnace  temper-
atures are discussed. Pilot scale results
focus on in-furnace NOX and S02 control
processes such  as reburning and sorbent
injection. Recent  activities include CCV
burner design  refinements, and devel-
oping staged combustion systems  for
utility boilers,   industrial stoker-fired
boilers, and  circulating  fluidized-bed
combustors. Since jet aerodynamics
influence combustion and NOX reduction
efficiencies, two-phase jets  in  furnace
enclosures are discussed.
Industrial and Utility Boiler Low
NOX Control Update

Joel Vatsky and Edmund S. Schindler
  NOX  control has been passing through
various phases as the regulatory and
commercial  climate has changed  since
the early 1970s. During the decade of the
70s,  emphasis  by  boiler  manufacturers
was  on developing  and  field demon-
strating NOX controls to meet  the New
Source Performance  Standards of  1971
and  1979.  More  recently,  with  the
reduced need  for new  utility generating
capacity, emphasis has shifted to retro-
fittable  technologies to meet pending
acid  rain control legislation.  This  paper
discusses field experience  with  Foster
Wheeler's low  NOX coal burner, which is
an inherently  retrofittable  design, on
industrial and  utility  boilers. New  con-
cepts  and  their  potential  uses are also
outlined.


NOX Control Update-1987

Albert D. LaRue and Paul L. Cioffi
  Babcock & Wilcox is expanding its low
NOX technology and  product  lines to
include systems directly  suited for  un
controlled sources and for an increasing
variety of  new  boiler  applications. Tru
low NOX cell burner  has successful!'
completed  two  scales of combustio
testing and  initial field trials, and awaits
full boiler demonstration. The XCL bums
was  developed  to  reduce  NOX belo<
existing low NOX burner capabilities whil
providing   individual  burner  air flo
measurement  and other features  I
improve performance. Reburning is beir
investigated as a NOX control  measure f<
cyclone-fired boilers. NOX emissions a
controlled with gas- and oil-fired units i
use of PG-Dual Register Burners cor
bined with  NOX ports  and gas recirci
ation. Further  NOX reduction can  I
achieved by use  of  In-Furnace  N<
Reduction.  Fluid  beds  provide  N
control  by virtue  of  the combusti
methodology, and lower  NOX levels  c
be reached by  staging. Refuse systei
often face a wide range of emission lii
tations, and the Controlled  Combust
Zone (CCZ™) furnace  offers  potential
improved  combustion and  lower  N
when firing  refuse-derived fuel. An upd
is  provided on the technology and pr
ucts used  by B&W  to control emissi
in these applications.
Session IV: Coal-Fired Boiler
Applications


The Federal Clean Coal
Program

Jack S. Siegel
  The  Department of Energy's  C
Coal Technology  Program is  broad
scope than just the control or prove
of pollutants from  coal using machin
also addresses the energ» needs c
U.S. economy; i.e., coal technoh
which can compete with oil and gi
markets which are now dominated I
and gas; coal technologies  whicf
allow utilities to cut the long  lead
now necessary  to design  and con
conventional coal-fired boilers with s
bers;  and coal technologies  whic
only control SO2 and NOX to NS
better  levels, but  which  also are
efficient and produce more easily
posal  wastes than  conventional
nologies. It  is our objective to  e>
the scope  of this effort, prese
overview of the R&D activity,  irw
the recently  initiated clean coal c

-------
tration program,  and discuss the attri-
 jtes of the  technologies which should
 isure that, once demonstrated, they will
je used commercially.


Development Status of B&W's
Second Generation Low NOX
Burner—The XCL Burner

Jbert 0. LaRue, Michael A. Acree,
 id Charles  Masser
  Due to the  national concern with acid
 in, the U.S. NOX  emission standards
lay  become more stringent  for new
ources, and  uncontrolled sources may
 ce NOX emission limits. B&W has con-
equently  proceeded  to  develop  a
econd generation low NOX pulverized
oal (PC) burner suitable  for  new or
 trofit applications.  A primary objective
  to minimize NOX  by  burner design to
void slagging and  corrosion concerns
  sociated with staged furnace operation.
 evelopment  of the XCL burner stemmed
 om the technology  of Babcock Hitachi's
 T-NR burner design. The development
 •ogram was cosponsored by the EPA,
 id consisted of full scale  (80 x 106
  u/hr) tests of a standard Dual Register
 jrner, an  HT-NR burner, and an XCL
 jrner. Air flow tests were conducted to
  aracterize flow  patterns  and  improve
 rirl efficiency,  and combustion  tests
 ere performed to evaluate and minimize
 nissions.  The  XCL burner  proved
  .Jabte of  NOX emissions (unstaged) of
 3-0.5 to/106 Btu with high efficiency and
 Jjustable flame shape. Consequently, a
 II  complement of  XCL burners  were
 trofitted to  Ohio Edison's  Edgewater
  lit 4 for the EPA Limestone  Injection
 ultistage Burner (LIMB) demonstration.
  le paper describes  development and
  ild results with the XCL burner.
   ductions in NOX Emissions
  3m a 500 MW Corner Fired
  5iler

  W. Allen, W. J. D. Brooks, N. A.
  rdett,  F. Clarke, and G. Foley
  The Central  Electricity  Generating
  ard is investigating  methods  for
  lucing  the emissions  of  NOX from
  sil-fired power stations.  Low NOX tech-
  ogies usually involve radically different
  nbustion regimes within  the boiler
  npared to conventional units; there-
  i, it is necessary  to investigate their
   t-effectiveness by undertaking  large
   le and long term trials. This paper
   Jrts on the  results of a programme
undertaken  to investigate the  character-
istics of the "rich-fireball"  technique
installed in a 500 MW(e) coal fired boiler
at Fiddler's Ferry Power Station, England.
Data are presented showing the impact of
operational  parameters  on NOX emis-
sions. It is concluded that the introduction
of this  technique has resulted in a
reduction of NOX emissions of 31-38%,
depending on the mills in service.
Application of Mitsubishi
"Advanced MACT" In-Furnace
NOX Removal Process at Taio
Paper Co., Ltd., Mishima Mills
No. 18 Boiler

M. Araoka, A. Iwanaga, and M. Sakai
  Mitsubishi Heavy  Industries, Ltd. has
been engaged in the research and devel-
opment of  new  technology concerning
the prevention of air  pollution. In the field
of low  NOX combustion technology, we
have already developed  and utilized
many  countermeasures; for  example,
super low NOX PM  burners and  MACT
systems which have already been intro-
duced at former symposiums.  This time,
we  have successfully developed and put
into practical  use the "Advanced MACT"
system. This paper introduces the outline
of this "Advanced MACT" system  and its
application  and operating experience at
Taio Paper  Co., Ltd., Mishima Mill  No. 18
Boiler.
Operating Experiences of Coal
Fired Utility Boilers Using Hitachi
NOX Reduction Burners

Tsuneo Narita, Fumio Koda,  Tadahisa
Masai, Shigeki Morita, and Shigeru
Azuhata
  Babcock-Hitachi K.K.  has  replaced
Dual Register  Burners with Hitachi NOX
Reduction burners (HT-NR) on two coal
fired  200  MWe boilers. The  HT-NR
burner was developed, as previously re-
ported, to apply the concept of In-Flame
NOX  Reduction.  The  two retrofitted
boilers have achieved further NOX reduc-
tion, without increased unburned  carbon
contents  or any other operating  prob-
lems. Actual NOX emissions depend on
the volatile matter content  of the coal:
with highly  volatile coal, emissions range
from 70  to 75  ppm  (6% O2). Five dif-
ferent coals are being fired in these units.
Rapid ignition and flame  stabilization are
enhanced by use of a new type ceramic
stabilizer. Even lower levels of NOX and
unburned carbon  can be  achieved by
increasing the coal fineness.


Long-Term Versus Short-Term
Data Analysis Methodologies—
Impact on the Prediction of NOX
Emission Compliance

Lowell L. Smith, Wallace S. Pins, III,
Randall Rush, and Timothy Flora
  Over  the last  two  decades,  con-
siderable NOX data from utility and indus-
trial boilers  have been accumulated. The
data sources range from short-term test
results to data obtained from continuous
emission monitors from Subpart Da utility
boilers. Depending upon the ultimate use
of these two types of data, different inter-
pretations of the emissions results can be
obtained. This  can have  far  reaching
impacts if the interpretation of the data is
used to establish the long-term effective-
ness of NOX control  technologies  or  to
establish new or revised emission stan-
dards. This  paper discusses the potential
ultimate uses of both short- and  long-
term data. The value of both is discussed
in terms of their use  for  establishing
emission control trends, operating and
retrofit guidelines,  and emission standard
setting. Statistical analysis methodologies
are presented for interpreting  long-term
data,  and illustrations  of  Time Series
Analysis are presented  for interpretation
of these data.


Engineering and Economic
Analysis of Retrofit Low-NOx
Combustion Systems

R. A. Lisauskas, R. D. Snodgrass, S.
A. Johnson, and D. Eskinazi
  The  feasibility of  retrofitting  low-NOx
combustion  controls on four utility wall-
fired boiler  designs has been evaluated.
This evaluation  included an engineering
analysis of all equipment  modifications,
and  a cost estimate for  each retrofit
option. Consideration  was given to  boiler
physical limitations and  operating con-
straints, as  well  as achieving NOX reduc-
tion.  NOX  emission  predictions  were
based  on  correlations developed  from
both field  installations and large  pilot-
scale combustion tests. The following
Iow-N0x  combustion  processes  were
evaluated:  Low-NOx  burners,  Conven-
tional air staging (Overfire air), Advanced
air staging  (Overfire air), and Reburning.
Costs are presented  in terms  of  $/kW,
mills/kWh,  and  $/ton  of NOX  removed.
The  cost of retrofit  NOX  controls was

-------
found to vary with  unit size and retrofit
complexity. Depending  on the level of
boiler modifications required, the capital
cost of retrofit combustion controls can
vary from  less  than  $3 to more than
$20/kW.


The Influence of Fuel Properties
and Boiler Design and Operation
on NOX Emissions

J. H. Pohl, G. C. Dusatko, P. C.
Orban, and R. W.  McGraw
  Methods to predict the dependence of
NOX emissions on coal properties, burner
design and operation, and boiler design
and operation  are unreliable, compli-
cated, or both. This paper determined the
functional dependence of NOX emissions
on  a number of these parameters  using
data available in the literature. The func-
tional dependences were then used to
successfully  explain the changes in NOX
emissions  observed for:  (1) a 660  MWe
boiler firing  two bituminous  coals  with
volatile contents of 26.3 and  18% as
received, and (2) two wall-fired 30  MWe
units and a 137 MWe tangential unit firing
a single coal with  a  volatile content of
24% as received. The change in the NOX
with coal,  primary air velocity, load, and
excess oxygen  content was  explained
using the  dependences derived in this
paper.


Volume II

Session  Va: Flue Gas Treatment


Current Status of SCR in Japan

Yasuyuki  Nakabayashi and Rikiya Abe
  Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of
NOX is widely applied to utility and indus-
trial boilers  in Japan. Among  utility
boilers, 99 units (about 110 x 106 Nm3/h)
have been equipped with SCR including
22 units of coal firing boilers (about 20 x
106 Nm3/h). Among industrial boilers, 31
units (about 3.3 x  106 Nm3/h) have also
been equipped with  SCR  (as of  April
1986). SCR installation started in 1977 for
oil and gas and in 1979 for coal  firing
boilers. These operating experiences
suggest that the cost and performance of
SCR should be discussed again, because
the catalyst  itself  (life,  volume require-
ment,  etc.) has been  improved remark-
ably. This  paper  will  describe  those
factors from a utility standpoint.
Operating Experience with the
SCR DeNOx Plant in Unit 5 of
Altbach/Deizisau Power Station

P. Necker
  The SCR DeNOx plant  in Unit  5 (420
MW) of Altbach-Deizisau  Power  Station
has been  in operation since late 1985.
The  plant represents  a  retrofit  to an
existing plant and is designed as a partial
flow plant  (1.1 x 106 m3/h  at 80% boiler
load). The experience obtained after
6,000 hours of operation (by the  end of
1986) has shown that it  is  possible to
observe the 200 mg  NCym3 limit value
stipulated  in Germany  when considera-
tion is given to the accompanying con-
ditions illustrated with full flow plants. The
demands placed on the partial flow plant
of Unit 5 are particularly high. The reduc-
tion in activity of the catalytic converter is
within the expected  range after  6,000
hours of operation. A partial air preheater
wash carried  out on  a test  basis
produced air preheater water which had a
high NH3 content initially only. The waste
water from the flue gas  desulfurization
plant contains only  a small quantity of
NH3. The NH3  values for the  flue dust
must be  monitored carefully, since they
may result in special  stipulations being
made for  operation of the DeNOx plant.
The  maintenance effort for the  opera-
tional measuring equipment required for
the DeNOx plant is relatively high.


VKR Full-Scale SCR  Experience
on Hard Coal Fired Boilers

Klaus Goldschmidt
  VEBA Kraftwerke Ruhr (VKR) operates
power plants in Northrine-Westfalia of the
Federal Republic of Germany with a total
capacity of 5500 MW  gross. Most of the
boilers are fired with high ballast hard
coal.  Older boilers  have  wet bottom
furnaces;  newer ones are dry  furnaces.
The great furnace ordinance of Germany
calls for a NOX emission rate 200 mg/m3
(i.e., 98 ppm), so all great boilers must be
retrofitted by DeNOx.  Meanwhile, VKR
reduced NOX emissions from their boilers
by  primary methods as far as possible.
Since the end of  1984, VKR handles up
to eight  pilot plants to prove  the SCR
technology. Since the end of 1985, 100%
of flue gas from district  heating boiler
Buer (dry bottom, 150 MW), and since
mid-1986, sponsored  by  UBA, 50% of
flue gas  from boiler  Knepper C  (molten
ash, 370  MW)  is treated by SCR high
dust  technology.  Based  on  pilot-plant
tests, the  paper describes  both  DeN
demonstration units, their operation,  a
the findings.


Applicability of European SCR
Experience to U.S. Utility
Operation

J. Edward Cichanowicz and Georg<
R. Often
  About 2200  MW  of  SCR capacity
operating or in  start-up in Europe ai
February 1987. Five full-scale syst<
are currently operational  in the Fed
Republic of Germany and two in Aus
Each unit has logged between 2000
6000 hours of operation. Experience I
these SCR installations will help d<
the cost and technical feasibility of
for potential U.S. application. This p
discusses  the relevant experience a
pated from  these and other Euroi
installations. Experience that will  dir
apply to U.S. conditions is  summai
as are topics which are  not releva
U.S. application due to plant desigr
fuel  limitations.  The European
installations are first  briefly surveyec
the  significant design and  oper
features reviewed. Relevant  experiei
categorized into four topics: SCR c«
design, catalyst lifetime, process  o
and  plant  integration. Finally,  i
critical to  the analysis of SCR tec
feasibility  and cost  for high sulfur
fired plants are summarized.


Comparison of Four Catalys
Used in  Selective  Catalytic
Reduction of NOX

Bo Herrlander
   Tested catalysts all show a pseu
order reaction. High  activity an
specific surface are  beneficial
performance, even  though  high
surface also means smaller pit
higher pressure  drop. The op
experiences are good, with no
activity deterioration.
 The Improvement of
 Injection Control System fo
 Selective Catalytic NOX Re
 System

 K. Suyama
  Mitsubishi  Heavy Industries I
 plied Selective  Catalytic NOX
 (SCR) systems  for more than

-------
joth  in Japan  and  abroad  since  it
 ilivered  the  first SCR system  for  a
 jiler in 1976. This paper describes the
:ontrol system of an SCR system devel-
>ped with a new concept to cope with the
ecent trend to operate a thermal power
)lant as a load swing operation unit and
s service results in a 600 MW boiler.


Development of Low Level NHs
/leasuring Method

'asuyuki Nakabayashi, Rikiya Abe,
nd Takusuke Izumi
 Performance of NOX reducing catalysts
rill  be  continuously checked by meas-
ring slip NH3 downstream of the  SCR
 actor. There are  two ways to measure
)w  level  NH3: one direct,  and the other
idirect. The  indirect  method  uses  a
atalyst, the same  kind we use to check
erformance, in order to convert NH3 to
 0.  EPOC  and  Anritsu  Corporation
 eveloped jointly the direct  NH3 meas-
rement and applied it  at Takehara #3
 '00 MW) unit. This instrument detects
 traviolet absorption of NH3 spectrum by
 equency modulation. Sampling method
  also important to measure low  level
 H3 (0-20 ppm) and is developed by us.
 lis paper will describe the principle of
 ese methods.


 pdated Technical and
 conomic Review of Selective
 latalytic NOX Reduction
 ystems

  E. Damon, P. A. Ireland, and 0. V.
 iovanni
 Selective Catalytic NOX Reduction is
 >w being used on coal-fired units in
 pan,  in both  retrofit and new unit
 plications. This update lists Japanese
 ial-fired  units using SCR. In addition,  it
 dates the  technical  design require-
  ints to help prevent air heater plugging
 1 ammonia-sulfur compounds.  The
  jor new requirement  is a lower NH3
 p  limit of 3  - 5 ppm  which in turn re-
  ires significantly  lower  space veloc-
  >s. Hence greater catalyst volumes and
  >cess costs are  realized than were
  ntified  2 or 3 years ago.  In addition,
  > impact of the devaluation of the dollar
 ainst the yen is reviewed. Current SCR
 st analyses for both a new utility coal-
  d unit  application,  and retrofit  utility
  l-fired  units are provided. The new
  ustrial NSPS NOX limits are presented,
  1  an SCR cost analysis on  a  small
  ustrial  generator is reviewed. Finally,
conclusions  based  on Japanese SCR
experience in terms of updated costs and
its present applicability to U.S. coal-fired
units are presented.

Session  Vb: Fundamental
Combustion Studies
Mechanisms of Fixed Nitrogen
Reduction in Pulverized Coal
Flames

John C. Kramlich, Thomas W. Lester,
and Jost O. L. Wendt
  Although the major features that mark
the  conversion of coal nitrogen have
been identified through extensive  re-
search, some portions  of the process are
not well understood. An understanding of
these processes,  and  their associated
rates, will provide the information needed
to develop process models. Three areas
have been identified for which present
process  models  fail  to   predict the
observed fixed nitrogen reduction: (1) the
reduction in nitrogen that occurs at very
short time, including devolatilization and
reaction in the  immediate vicinity of the
coal particle; (2) nitrogen reduction in the
bulk fuel-rich  regions  that  are charac-
teristic of staged combustion and reburn-
ing applications; and  (3) fixed nitrogen
reduction  at the final  leaning-out point.
The work  reported here examines these
problems  through  tasks  on: homog-
eneous kinetics, NO reduction by  hetero-
geneous media, and the overall process
of fixed nitrogen reduction  in direct coal
combustion.


The Interplay Between  Chemistry
and Fluid Mechanics in the
Oxidation of Fuel Nitrogen from
Pulverized Coal

Charles Kruger, Greg Haussmann,
and Steve Krewson
  The evolution and subsequent reaction
of gas-phase  nitrogenous species from
pulverized Montana Rosebud subbitumin-
ous  coal  have been  measured  in  the
Stanford entrained-flow reactor under uni-
form  and  well controlled  conditions.
Experiments have been performed  at
atmospheric pressure  with  temperature
up to 1850 K and  oxygen concentrations
varying from zero to 15.0 %. Gas-phase
measurements have  been  made  of
carbon oxides, light hydrocarbons, NO,
NO2, N20, NH3, and HCN. Chemical and
physical analyses of party reacted coal
particles provide data on the carbon and
nitrogen content, porosity, and the rate of
tar  pyrolysis.  A major  focus  of this
research has been the role of tar  in the
evolution of fuel nitrogen. At high heating
rates, substantial quantities  of  tar  are
evolved in very short reaction times, and
the  pyrolysis  products  are rich  in
nitrogen.  The rate of reaction  of  these
products in and  around  a volatile  cloud
surrounding the  parent coal particle
controls the oxidation of fuel nitrogen.
The  measurements show that, when the
pyrolyzing coal  particles are exposed to
oxygen concentrations as low as 4%,  a
significant portion of the fuel nitrogen can
be oxidized to NO, although some of this
NO is subsequently reduced in  the gas
phase.


Reduction of NOX by Fuel
Staging

Majed A. Toqan, J. Derek Teare,
Janos M.  Beer,  Leslie J. Radak,  and
Alexander Weir, Jr.
  Results are reported of theoretical and
experimental studies in which natural gas
was used as "reburn" fuel for NOX reduc-
tion in  a No.  6 fuel oil flame. A Sandia
chemical kinetic  code with kinetic para-
meters  of  hydrocarbon/NO  reactions,
developed by J.M. Levy  and B.R. Taylor
at MIT, was  used to predict chemical
species concentrations in the  "reburn"
zone as a function of residence  time,
initial NO concentration, gas temperature,
and  fuel  equivalence ratio  (0). The
fractional reduction of high initial NO con-
centrations^ 800 ppm) in the reburn stage
is shown to be proportional to the con-
centrations of CH, and NHj species. At
high  temperatures (2000  K), the
abundance of  CH,  and NH,  species
causes a reduction of NO from 800 to 46
ppm at a  0 of  1.3.  At  lower initial  NO
concentrations (~ 40 ppm), NO formation
dominates over  its  reduction,  with  the
result that better reduction of  NO  is
achieved at the lower  temperature  of
1800 K: for an initial 25 and 38 ppm at
1800 and  2000  K,  respectively.  For  a
given gas temperature the  CHj radical
concentration  increases  with increasing
fuel  equivalence ratio in the  "reburn"
zone, and the fractional conversion  of NO
to N2 as a function of 0 follows the usual
trend of showing an optimum  at around
0 = 1.3. At lower than optimal   fuel
equivalence ratios  the  NO reduction
becomes strongly temperature depend-
ent. (At 0  = 1.1 calculated  NO reduc-

-------
tions are 18%  at  1780 K  and 60% at
2000 K.) Experimental data obtained in a
1.5 MW No.  6  oil flame with  400 ppm
(doped) initial NO concentration and at 0
=  1.1  showed  good  agreement with
predictions.
Fuel Bound Nitrogen Evolution
During the Devolatilization and
Pyrolysis of Coals of Varying
Rank

J. D. Freihaut, W. M. Prosica, and D.
J. Seery
  The near-term use  of  coal for  power
generation  involves the  development  of
low NOX burners for retrofit  applications
or the design  of new boiler  systems.
Intermediate and  long-term  applications
propose using dry or slurried micronized
coal  feeds in modular, load-following
high-intensity  combustion systems.  All
systems  anticipate  a  form of stoichio-
metric staging of the micro-scale  com-
bustion process  to obtain  acceptable
levels of NOX emissions. However, maxi-
mizing carbon  burnout while minimizing
NOX  formation  in  these  systems  will
require  the formulation  of  quantitative
models of  the micro-scale  combustion
process of coals of varying rank  char-
acteristics. The complexity of the proces-
ses  involved will  necessitate models
more empirical  and  phenomenological
than mechanistic, but will need to take
into  account the  significant  variation  in
nitrogen  evolution  pathways  with coal
type. This  paper reports  results  of  an
investigation of  the nitrogen  evolution
behavior of a range of  coal ranks in a
variety  of  heating  conditions  and the
initial formulation of a kinetic  model  of
coal  nitrogen  devolatilization.  With
respect to the total  mass fraction of coal
nitrogen volatilized during transient heat-
ing of particles  to  1000°C, the evolution
of fuel bound nitrogen appears relatively
rank-insensitive  in moderate  heating rate
conditions  for  high volatile  bituminous
coals and lower ranks. The mass fraction
of nitrogen evolved  follows the  mass
fraction of coal  volatilized  and,  under
conditions where secondary  reactions of
tar are minimized, the distribution  of
parent coal nitrogen between tar and light
gases follows  the  distribution  of  parent
coal mass between these volatile types.
The distribution of coal nitrogen in volatile
types varies as  the distribution of coal
mass  between  the volatile types. For
medium volatile and higher rank coals,
the mass fraction of nitrogen evolved
during particle heating to  1000°C varies
as the volatility  of parent coal and  is
therefore  rank sensitive.  However,  in
moderate  heating rate  conditions, the
distribution  of  parent coal  nitrogen
between volatile types continues to follow
the distribution  of parent coal mass
between  these types. The susceptibility
of devolatilization-produced tar species to
secondary pyrolysis  reactions varies
significantly  with  coal  rank character-
istics. Secondary reactions of tar occur
within the devolatilizing particle, in the
boundary  layer around the particle, and
the  free  stream.  High  temperature
secondary pyrolysis  reactions  of  tars
occurring in fuel rich conditions result in
the release of tar-bound nitrogen to the
light gas component of the volatile yield,
primarily in the form  of HCN. The  high
temperature secondary  reaction  network
leading to the production of cyanide  spe-
cies also  produces acetylene, ethylene,
and  carbon monoxide and appears  to
commence the onset  of soot production.
The  secondary reaction network for tars
commences at particle  or gas temper-
atures of  900°C  with a strong temper-
ature and coal rank  dependence.  The
formation  of  light  gas nitrogen species,
NOX precursors,  is strongly rank-depen-
dent because the temperature  sensitivity
of secondary reactions  of the  heavy
hydrocarbons formed at  relatively low
particle temperatures, 300-600°C, varies
with the  mix of  hydrocarbon species
present in the parent  coal; i.e., the  rank
characteristics of parent  coal. Progress in
the  formulation  of a rank-dependent
model of nitrogen evolution is discussed.


Session VI: Cyclone-Fired
Boilers


Feasibility  of Reburning for
Cyclone Boiler NOX Control

G. J. Maringo, M. A. Acree, H.
Farzan, and M.  W. McElroy
   This paper gives results of  an  engi-
neering and economic feasibility study of
reburning  as a  potential retrofit  NOX
reduction  method for coal-fired cyclone
boilers.  Results indicate that  most
cyclone  boilers  are suitable for retrofit
from  the  standpoint of  available furnace
residence time, a key  parameter in apply-
ing the technology. Heat transfer analysis
for a 200 MW cyclone boiler case study
predicts insignificant increases in furnace
exit gas temperatures; thus, no conve
tive pass  or sootblowlng modificatio
would be  required. No  technical fact<
were  identified  that  would  preclu
retrofit of  reburning  to most  of  t
cyclone boiler generating capacity. N
reductions predicted for 200 and 700 to
boilers were 50 and 60%, respective
without derating.  These  predictions
based  on the  units'  available  furn;
residence  times.  Capital  and  10-y
levelized  busbar  power  cost  estims
ranged from $15 to $34/kW and 1.6 to
mills/kWh,  depending on the  reburr
fuel selected. A follow-on pilot reburr
project on a 6 x 106  Btu/hr  cycle
equipped test furnace is also describe
NOX Control Options for Coal-
Fired Cyclone Utility Boilers

R. E. Thompson, R. M. Himes, an
G. R. Often
  The implementation of stringent
regulations in  Japan and West Gerr
has  increased the  probability of
control provisions in acid rain legisl
in the U.S. The economic impact o
proposed  legislation is a serious coi
to  utilities with cyclone units bee
they have high NOX emissions and
few  cost-effective retrofit options.
paper highlights an EPRI study dir
at evaluating NOX control options ra
from  conventional and advanced
bustion modifications to Iow-N0x sla
combustors, reburn technology, an
gas  treatment. The first phase  c
study included a review of cyclom
emission  characteristics,  their d
dence on boiler design and op«
parameters, and  a comparison to
unit designs. Prior attempts to redt
clone NOX emissions by means o
bustion modifications  were  eva
and  constraints  to Iow-N0x opi
identified. These design  and op
constraints included reduced com
gas  temperature, slag capture ai
cosity control, high temperatur
rosion, and carbon burnout. The
NOX  reduction potential and op
constraints of  several  potential
NOX  control  concepts were thei
pared on a preliminary basis to de
which concepts exhibited  th<
promise.  A more detailed evalu
these  concepts in continuing, ii
brief technical  and economii
parisons  to alternative NOX cor
tions for cyclone units.

-------
TRW Coal Combustor-NOx
Emissions

Donald J. Frey
  TRW has  developed  an atmospheric,
entrained-coal combustor with significant
support from DOE/PETC which can either
be  retrofitted to existing  units  or
integrated with new  steam generating
equipment. The concept  consists  of a
water-cooled main combustor  in  which
pulverized coal is burned in suspension
at heat  release rates approaching 106
Btu/hr-ft3 of  combustor volume.  Com-
bustion occurs  at sub-stoichiometric con-
ditions in order to control NOX formation.
More than 90% of the  ash is  removed
from the combustors as  molten slag. The
flue  gas  exiting the combustor is at a
temperature near 1650°C,  contains
almost no carbon, only  10% of the ash,
and CO and  H2 (amounting to about 15%
of the original heat input). These gaseous
combustibles must be burned in the host
boiler, and the final air, termed secondary
air, is injected  into the furnace through a
conventional windbox/burner  arrange-
ment. TRW has conducted many tests at
its Capistrano  test facilities  to  minimize
NOX formation. The earlier determinations
were made  on a 10  x  10e  Btu/hr  com-
bustor,  firing  Utah,  Wyoming,  and
Montana  coals. The secondary air was
admitted  through fixed  pipes, and final
combustion  occurred  in an uninsulated
water-cooled chamber.  Later tests were
performed in a 50 x  106 Btu/hr  com-
bustor, also  at Capistrano. These results
supported most of the earlier conclusions
and  provided additional  insight regarding
the beneficial effects on  NOX formation of
controlled mixing and burning in the
secondary combustion stage.


Session Vila: OH- and Gas-Fired
Boilers
Methanol Dual-Fuel Combustion

Alexander Weir, Jr., Leslie J. Radak,
Edward A.  Danko, Ray A. Lewis, and
Harry W. Buchanan
  Dual-fuel  combustion is a technique
invented to  lower emissions of NOX from
boilers. This paper presents experimental
data using this technique in a utility boiler
at a level of 35 MW. Tests with low sulfur
(0.21% S) oil/natural gas, low sulfur oil/
methanol, and natural gas/methanol were
performed,  and the NOX  emission  data
were compared with  NOX emissions  of
100% low sulfur oil, gas,  and methanol.
Tests with a  mixture  of  70% natural
gas/30% methanol revealed that the NOX
emissions level  using the  dual-fuel
technique  was  lower than those obtained
with either 100% gas or 100% methanol.
The NOX level was about 25% of the level
obtained  with natural  gas fired  in a
conventional combustion mode or  about
50%  of the  NOX  level obtained with
natural gas fired in a "staged" combus-
tion or "burners-out-of-service" mode, a
state-of-the-art combustion modification
technique used to lower NOX emissions.


Application of Fuel Biasing for
NOX Emission Reductions in
Gas-Fired Utility Boiler

Greg C. Quartucy, M.  N. Mansour,
and James N. Nylander
  The effectiveness of fuel  biasing  in
reducing  NOX  emissions from  gas-fired
utility boilers has been  evaluated by  the
San  Diego  Gas & Electric  Company
(SDG&E).  The unit chosen for  this eval-
uation, South Bay Unit 1, is  a 150 MW
face-fired unit which currently meets local
NOX emissions limits by operating with
burners-out-of-service  (BOOS).  This
operating  mode results in CO emissions
of greater  than 2000  ppm  and an  O2
imbalance. Fuel biasing offers a reduction
in NOX emission by  controlling  com-
bustion stoichiometry  in two discrete
combustion  stages: the first  operated
fuel-rich to limit the  formation  of thermal
NOX; and the second operated fuel-rich or
fuel-lean. The  primary  advantage of fuel
biasing is that it provides better control of
combustion stoichiometry, which reduces
02 imbalances and increased CO  emis-
sions which  may accompany BOOS
operation.  The effect of fuel bias ratio, air
register position, and excess oxygen
level on unit emissions  and performance
was  evaluated.  The use of fuel biasing
allowed the  unit to  meet  local NOX
regulations, while decreasing  the 02  im-
balance and reducing  CO emissions  to
less than 500 ppm. Additionally, improve-
ments in  unit  operating efficiency were
measured  when  using  the fuel biasing
firing mode.


NOX Inventory and Retrofit
Assessment

Dominick  J. Mormile, Stephen E.
Kerho, Skillman C.  Hunter, and Peter
E. Coffey
  The Empire  State Electric Energy Re-
search Corp.  (ESEERCO) has  funded a
program  to develop  a  model  for
estimating NOX emissions from the New
York Power Pool  (NYPP) electric system
for different  generation  dispatch scenar-
ios. Baseline emission  levels for each
boiler and for the entire system were
calculated. In addition, the  technical
feasibility, NOX reduction potential, and
cost of commercially available NOX con-
trol technologies were evaluated for each
boiler.  Besides quantifying  annual NOX
emission rates for NYPP fossil-fuel-fired
power  plants,  the model  enables
ESEERCO to evaluate  the effectiveness
and costs of alternative NOX reduction
strategies.
Full  Scale  Evaluation  of  Urea
Injection for NO Removal

M. N. Mansour, Sam N. Nahas, Greg
C. Quartucy, James N. Nylander,
Harold A. Kerry, Les J. Radak, David
Eskinazi, and T. S. Behrens
  An  engineering evaluation  was  per-
formed by  San Diego Gas and Electric
(SDG&E)  to assess the  use  of urea
injection  for NO emissions control on
gas-  and oil-fired utility boilers.  This
evaluation consisted  of a field assess-
ment  of  the technology  on Unit 2  at
SDG&E Encina Generating  Station  and
an evaluation of technology economics.
The program was co-funded by Southern
California  Edison  Company (SCE)  and
the Electric Power  Research Institute
(EPRI). Fuel Tech,  Inc. (FT)  co-spon-
sored the field assessment. The program
represented the first  application of  urea
technology to  a utility  boiler.  Urea in-
jection for  NO  emissions control  was
developed in  1976 by KVB  under EPRI
sponsorship. It involves  spraying urea as
an aqueous solution into the products  of
combustion where  the  urea reacts  with
NO in the gas phase to produce  molec-
ular nitrogen and water.  The process de-
pends  on combustion gas temperature
with  a reduction in  emissions  achieved
between 760 and 1090°C. The results  of
the field  assessment showed that urea is
effective in reducing NO emissions from
natural-gas-  and  fuel-oil-fired  utility
boilers. NO removals ranged from 30  to
70%.  Variables  identified  as influencing
the performance of the process included
the urea  to NO  mole ratio,  injection
variable,  initial  NO  concentration,  and
urea  solution  concentration.  The
economic assessment has  shown that the
cost  of urea injection is sensitive to the
level of NO removal achieved, plant size,
and  plant  capacity  factor.  The total

-------
levelized costs for the process  were
estimated based on the performance  of
the system currently undergoing evalu-
ation.  The cost of the technology  was
estimated for plants ranging from 100  to
500 MW in  size  and  operating over a
broad range of initial NO concentrations.
For the case studied, the levelized cost  of
the technology ranged from  $700  to
$3500/ton of NO removed with the lower
cost obtained from the largest plant oper-
ating at high initial NO (600 ppm @ 3%
02). Future work includes optimizing the
performance of the urea injection system
to improve reagent utilization and level  of
NO removal  achieved.  Future work will
also define the control logic for a  fully
automated urea injection system as well
as establish the effects on boiler opera-
tion of long-term urea injection.
Retrofit Combustion Controls for
Gas/Oil-Fired Utility Boilers

Wesley W. Pepper, Ronald F. Balingit,
Dan V. Giovanni, and Donald P.
Teixeira
  The  NOX  Reduction  Program,  a
voluntary undertaking by the City of Los
Angeles, Department of Water and Power
(LADWP), was initiated after determining
that  utility boilers in the Los Angeles
Basin are becoming targets for additional
NOX controls  and  that Rule  1135.1  NOX
settlement limits may be exceeded in the
future under certain dispatch and fuel use
scenarios. The program is based  on two
objectives: (1) to  implement  measures
that  will ensure  continued  compliance
with  the Rule 1135.1  NOX  settlement
emission limits, which could be exceeded
in the  1990s under  certain  resource
scenarios such as  unavailability of natural
gas or  hydroelectric import energy; and
(2) to evaluate advanced  Iow-N0x com-
bustion  technology capabilities systems
as an alternative to postcombustion treat-
ment for retrofit on existing low capacity
factor utility boilers.  Combustion controls
appear to be significantly more cost ef-
fective  than  postcombustion treatment,
and their installation could be  incorpora-
ted with other compatible boiler modi-
fications  that would  improve  boiler
reliability and  thermal performance. The
LADWP  NOX Reduction Program  is
designed  to  accomplish  these  overall
objectives through  a three-phase ap-
proach: Phase 1 was an  engineering
evaluation of advanced combustion NOX
control techniques applicable to LADWP
oil/gas-fired boilers; Phase 2 involves the
design, fabrication, and installation  of a
low-NOx demonstration system  on  one
LADWP boiler; and Phase 3 will be the
test, evaluation, and demonstration of the
installed  Iow-N0x technology. Tasks
performed to accomplish the  Phase 1
objective were: (1) to identify and screen
applicable NOX control alternatives; (2) to
assess commercial experience with  ad-
vanced low-NOx  combustion technology
in Japan;  (3)  to solicit  preliminary
technical/budgetary proposals from Bab-
cock & Wilcox  (B&W) and Combustion
Engineering  (C-E) which provide esti-
mates of  NOX emissions control capabil-
ities for the LADWP units; (4) to analyze
the information  from  Japanese  installa-
tions  and  the   boiler manufacturer's
proposals; and (5) to select a boiler and
NOX control technology for consideration
in Phase 2. The work was performed
jointly by  LADWP and its  consultants,
Electric Power Technologies (EPT) and
Electric Power Services International,  Inc.
This paper summarizes the results  of
Phase 1 and plans for Phases 2 and 3.
Session Vllb: Industrial and
Commercial Applications


Pilot-Scale Tests of a
Multistaged Burner Designed for
Low NOX Emission and High
Combustion Efficiency

James A. Mulholland and R. K.
Srivastava
  A multistaged  combustion  burner de-
sign  is  being evaluated on  a 0.6 MW
package boiler  simulator for  in-furnace
NOX control and high  combustion
efficiency. An adiabatic  precombustion
chamber burner has been reduced in size
by about a factor of two. Natural gas,
doped with ammonia to yield  a 5.8% fuel
nitrogen content, was used to simulate a
high nitrogen content fuel/waste mixture.
A burner baseline NO emission  of 315
ppm (measured dry, corrected to 0% 02)
was  measured,  compared  with  an
emission of over 1000 ppm estimated for
a conventional, unstaged  burner.  Both
deep  air  staging,  resulting in a  three-
stage configuration, and fuel staging with
undoped natural gas,  yielding  four
stoichiometric  zones,  reduced  the
baseline NO  emission by about 50% (to
160  ppm), meeting the program  goal.
However, deep air staging resulted in the
entire front end of the broiler  being fuel-
rich and required  penetrations into the
boiler for  staged  air injection.  Fuel
staging,  on the other hand, required no
boiler penetrations (staged  fuel and air
were injected from the boiler front wall)
and only a small  fuel-rich flame core in
the boiler (produced aerodynamically).
Furthermore,  sufficient  air for  complete
oxidation  of  the  primary  combustion
products was provided at  the burner exit
(prior to staged fuel and air  injection into
the boiler) in the fuel staging tests. Thus
the four-stage configuration  appears to
be the  most  promising  approach for
minimizing   NO  emissions  and
maximizing   primary  fuel/waste
destruction.  Further testing  is ongoing
with  pyridine and  fuel oil  mixtures to
better characterize surrogate  fuel/waste
destruction efficiency.
Diesel Engine NOX Control:
Selective Catalytic Reduction
and Methanol Emulsion

John H. Wasser and Richard B. Perry
  EPA's Air and Energy Engineering Re
search Laboratory  has  recently  con
ducted two diesel engine NOX reductioi
studies: one a long  term  evaluation of <
selective  catalytic reduction  (SCR) sys
tern, and the other  an  evaluation c
methanol emulsion fuel. The SCR projec
established the  NOX  reductio
performance  of a catalytic unit over
4000-hour period. NOX reductions range
between 98 and 69% during the test, wil
periodic   (approximately every  130
hours)  dry cleaning  required to mainta
activity. Measurements of  other pollutan
(CO and particulate matter) indicated th
the catalyst and/or ammonia addition hi
no effect  on these emissions. No advert
operational problems  were encounter
on  the engine system during the  te
program.  The  methanol proje
established the performance of this fi
modification. The  diesel system w
equipped  with a fuel emulsification u
capable of delivering methanol/fuel-oil
water/fuel-oil mixtures to the engine's fi
supply line.  NOX emission reductions
20-25%  were measured  when  firi
methanol/fuel-oil emulsions compared
fuel-oil firing only.  However,  substar
increases in CO (from 30  to 70 ppm) i
hydrocarbon  (from  4 to 200  ppm) en
sions were also  recorded. The metti
ol/oil emulsion results are also compa
to water/oil emulsion results on the  s<
engine.
                                                          10

-------
The Control of NOX Emissions
From Municipal Solid Waste
Incinerators

M. P. Heap, W. S. Lanier, and W. R.
  Disposal of municipal solid waste is a
growing  problem  because of  the
declining  capacity  of landfills  and
restrictions on  their use.  Incineration
provides a  cost  effective solution: the
bulk of material  requiring landfilling  is
reduced, the  material  can be landfilled
with minimal restrictions, and the energy
in the waste is converted to usable  heat
and/or power. Incineration  cannot be
accomplished without due consideration
to the generation and  control  of atmos-
pheric pollutants. Of major  concern are
trace quantities  of  potentially toxic
hydrocarbons. The  emission of these
species can be minimized by appropriate
design and operation of the combustion
systems;  unfortunately, these  measures
tend to  increase rather than  decrease
emissions of NOX. This paper discusses
the  types of municipal waste combustion
devices and the types  of pollutants
generated during waste combustion.  Four
methods of NOX control are discussed:
Combustion Zone Control, Selective Non-
Catalytic, Selective Catalytic, and Hybrid
Processes.


Nitrogen Oxide Emissions
Reduced from Cement  Kiln
Exhaust Gases by  Process
Modification

M.  S. May, R. MacMann, J. C.
Phillips, and G. L. Young
  In January  1982 the  South  Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD),
El Monte, CA, adopted  a rule to reduce
emissions of NOX from the exhaust gases
of pqrtlant  cement kilns  in the  South
Coast Air Basin. The rule was drafted  to
allow  cement manufacturers to demon-
strate through research whether or not
NOX could be reduced by modification of
the  cement  manufacturing  process.
Riverside Cement Company, as a result
of  review of the literature and  pilot
studies  conducted  by  KVB,    Inc.,
selected the  following four tactics as
having potential for  reducing   NOX
emissions: (1) reduce the quantity of fuel
used per ton of clinker; (2) reduce the
quantity  and temperature of the primary
air;  (3) control the configuration of the
flame; and  (4) improve control  of the
operation  of  the kiln. The Riverside
Cement Company was able  to demon-
strate with statistical confidence that the
NOX emissions, after the implementation
of the four tactics for the cement  manu-
facturing  process, were  26%  less than
the premodification emissions.
NOX Formation in a Cement Kiln:
Regression Analysis


John M. Groom, Mallory S. May,
Gerald L. Young, Craig Phillips, and
Russ MacMann
  NOX  emissions from  a  cement kiln
were analyzed with  step-wise  linear
regression. The goal was to demonstrate
which operating variable(s)  control the
rate of NOX emissions. Of 14 independent
variables in the regression analysis, burn-
ing zone temperature of the kiln was the
only significant variable; it accounted for
83% of the variability in NOX emissions.
Because the burning zone required  for
production of acceptable quality clinker
averages between  1300 and  1400°C,
minimum NOX emission from a long, dry
cement kiln is probably 5-6 Ib NO,/ton of
clinker produced.
Authors' Addresses
  Authors'  addresses appear below
alphabetically, rather than with their indi-
vidual abstracts.
Rikiya  Abe,  Research and  Engineering
  Office, Thermal Power Dept.,  Electric
  Power Development Co.,  Ltd., Tokyo,
  100, Japan.
Michael A. Acree, Domestic  Fossil Oper-
  ations, Babcock and Wilcox, Barberton,
  OH  44203.
Rui F. Afonso, Group Manager, Dynatech
  Scientific, 99 Erie St., Cambridge, MA
  02139.
J. W. Allen, NEI International Combus-
  tion, Ltd., Sinfin Lane, Derby, DE2 9GJ,
  United Kingdom.
M.  Araoka,  Boiler Engineering Dept.,
  Power  Systems  Engineering  Div.,
  Power Systems Hq., Mitsubishi Heavy
  Industries, Ltd., Shin-tamachi Bldg. 34-
  6, Shiba 5-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo,
  108, Japan.
Richard E.  Ayers, Senior Attorney, Na-
  tural Resources Defense Council, 1350
  New York Ave., N.W., Washington, DC
  20005.
Shigeru Azuhata, Senior  Researcher,
  Coal  Technology Center,  Hitachi  Re-
  search Laboratory, Hitachi,  Ltd., Ibaragi,
  319-12, Japan.
Ronald F. Balingit, Dept. of  Water and
  Power,  City  of Los  Angeles,  Los
  Angeles, CA  90012.
W.  Bartok, Energy  and Environmental
  Research Corp., Irvine, CA 92718.
Janos M. Beer, Dept. of Chemical Engin-
  eering  and the Energy Laboratory,
  Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
  Cambridge, MA  02139.
T. S. Behrens,  Fuel Tech, Inc., 61 Taylor
  Reed Place, Stamford, CT 06906.
S. J.  Bortz, KVB, Inc.,  18006 Skypark
  Blvd., Irvine, CA  92714.
W. J. D. Brooks, Generation Development
  and Construction Div., Central Electri-
  city Generating Board, Barnett  Way,
  Barnwood,  Gloucester,  GL4  7RS,
  United Kingdom.
Robert I. Bruck,  Associate Professor  of
  Plant Pathology and  Forestry, North
  Carolina  State Univ.,  Raleigh, NC
  27695-7616.
Harry W. Buchanan,  Celanese  Corp.,
  New York, NY 10036.
N. A.  Burdett,  Technology  Planning and
  Research Div., Marchwood Engineering
  Laboratories,  Central Electricity Gener-
  ating Board,  Marchwood, Southhamp-
  ton, S04 4ZB, United Kingdom.
S. L.  Chen, Energy and Environmental
  Research Corp., 18 Mason,  Irvine, CA
  92718.
J. Edward Cichanowicz, Project Manager,
  Integrated Environmental Control, Elec-
  tric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto,
  CA 94303.
Paul L. Cioffi, Domestic Fuel Operations,
  Babcock and Wilcox,  Barberton, OH
  44203.
M. J. Clark, Domestic Fuel Operations,
  Babcock and Wilcox,  Barberton, OH
  44203.
F. Clarke, Central Electricity  Generating
  Board, OED,  Midlands Area,  Ratcliffe-
  on-Soar, Nottinghamshire, NG11  OEE,
  United Kingdom.
Peter E.  Coffey, New York Power Pool,
  3890 Carman Rd.,  Schenectady, NY
  12303.
M. B.  Cohen,  Fossil  Power  Systems,
  Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor,
  CT 06095.
John M.  Groom,  Quantitative  Applica-
 tions, Inc., 3898 West Wood Path, Stone
 Mountain, GA  30083.
J. E.  Damon,  Stearns-Roger  Div.  of
 United  Engineers  and Constructors,
 Denver, CO 80217.
Edward  A.  Danko, Southern  California
  Edison Co., Rosemead, CA 91770.
                                                         11

-------
G. C. Ousatko, Energy Systems Associ-
  ates, Tustin, CA 92680.
David Eskinazi, Electric Power Research
  Institute, 3412 Hillview Ave.,  Palo Alto,
  CA 94303.
H. Farzan,  Research and Development
  Div., Babcock and Wilcox, Alliance, OH
  44601.
Timothy Flora, Ohio Edison  Co., Lorain,
  OH 44052.
G. Foley,  Central  Electricity Generating
  Board,  Fiddler's Ferry Power  Station,
  Widnes  Rd.,  Cuerdley,  Warrington,
  WAS 2UT, United Kingdom.
B. A. Folsom, Energy and Environmental
  Research Corp., Irvine, CA 92718.
J. D. Freihaut, United  Technologies Re-
 search Center, E. Hartford, CT 06108.
Donald J.  Frey, TRW,  Inc.,  Redondo
  Beach, CA 90278.
Dan V. Giovanni, Electric Power Techno-
  logy, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94705.
Klaus Goldschmidt,  VEBA  Kraftwerke
  Ruhr AG,  D 4650 Gelsenkirchen,
  Federal Republic of Germany.
Charles  Hakkarinen, Electric  Power
  Research Institute, 3412 Hillview Ave.,
  Palo Alto, CA 94303.
Greg  Haussmann, Dept. of  Mechanical
  Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford,
  CA 94305.
M. P. Heap,  Energy  and Environmental
  Research Corp., 18 Mason, Irvine, CA
  92718.
T. D. Hellewell, Fossil  Power Systems,
  Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor,
  CT 06095.
Bo Herrlander, Flakt  Industri  AB, Vaxjo,
  Sweden.
R. M. Himes, Fossil Energy  Research
  Corp., Laguna Hills, CA 92653.
Skillman  C. Hunter,  KVB,  Inc.,  18006
  Skypark Blvd., Irvine, CA 92714.
Hiroshige  Ikebe,  Boilers Research and
  Development Dept.,  Boiler  Plant Div.,
  Ishikawajima Harima Heavy  Industries
  Co., Ltd., 3-13, 5-Chome,  Toyo, Koto-
  ku, Tokyo, 135, Japan.
P. A. Ireland,  Steams-Roger  Div.  of
  United  Engineers  and Constructors,
  Denver, CO 80217.
A. Iwanage, Manager, No. 2 Land  Boiler
  Designing Section,  Nagasaki  Shipyard
  and Engine Works, Mitsubishi  Heavy
  Industries, Ltd., 1-1, Akuno-oura-machi,
  Nagasaki, Japan.
Takusuke  Izumi,  Engineering  Dept.,
  Industrial Automation Div.,  Anritsu
  Corp., Tokyo, 106, Japan.
Stephen A. Johnson,  Physical Sciences,
  Inc.,  P.O.  Box  3100, Andover, MA
  01810.
Stephen E. Kercho, Electric Power Tech-
  nologies, Inc., P.O. Box 5560, Berkeley,
  CA 94750.
Harold A. Kerry,  Southern California
  Edison  Co,  2244 Walnut  Grove  Ave.,
  Rosemeade, CA 91770.
Takashi Kiga, Boilers  Research and De-
  velopment  Dept., Boiler  Plant  Div.,
  Ishikawajima Harima Heavy  Industries
  Co., Ltd., 3-13,  5-Chrome,  Toyo,  Koto-
  ku, Tokyo, 135, Japan.
Fumio  Koda,  Deputy  Manager, Thermal
  Power Design  Dept.,  Babcock-Hitachi,
  K. K. Kure, Hiroshima, 737, Japan.
A. Kokkinos, Fossil  Power  Systems,
  Combustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor,
  CT 06095.
John C. Kramlich,  Energy and Environ-
 mental  Research Corp.,  18 Mason,
 Irvine, CA 92718.
Steve  Krewson,  Dept.  of  Mechanical
  Engineering, Stanford  Univ., Stanford,
  CA 94305.
Charles Kruger, Dept. of Mechnical  Engi-
  neering,  Stanford Univ., Stanford,  CA
  94305.
F. R. Kurzynske,  Gas Research Institute,
  Chicago, IL 60631.
W.  Steven Lanier,  Energy and Environ-
  mental  Research  Corp.,  18 Mason,
  Irvine, CA  92718.
Albert  D.  LaRue,  Domestic  Fuel  Oper-
  ations, Babcock and Wilcox, Barberton,
  OH 44203.
R. Leibfritz, Institute of Industrial Produc-
  tion, Univ. of Karlsruhe, Hertzstrasse 16,
  7500 Karlsruhe  21, Federal Republic of
  Germany.
Thomas W.  Lester, Dept. of Mechanical
  Engineering, Louisiana State  Univ.,
  Baton Rouge, LA  70803.
Ray A. Lewis, Celanese Chemical Co.,
  Inc., Dallas, TX  75247.
R. D. Lewis, Fossil Power Systems,  Com-
  bustion Engineering, Inc., Windsor, CT
  06095.
A. D. Liang,  Research and Development,
  Babcock and  Wilcox, Alliance,  OH
  44601.
Robert A. Lisauskas,  Riley Stoker  Corp.,
  P.O.  Box 547, Worcester, MA  01613.
Russ MacMann, Gifford-Hill and Co., Inc.,
  300  E.  John W. Carpenter  Freeway,
  Irving, TX  75062.
Keiji Makmo,  Boilers Research and
  Development Dept., Boiler Plant Div.,
  Ishikawajima  Harima Heavy  Industries
  Co., Ltd., 3-13, 5-Chome, Toyo, Koto-
  ku, Tokyo, 135, Japan.
M. N. Mansour, Applied  Utility Systems,
  Inc.,  1720 E. Garry Ave., Suite  221,
  Santa Ana, CA 92705.
G. J. Maringo, Domestic Fossil  Opera-
  tions, Babcock and Wilcox, Barberton,
  OH 44203.
Tadahisa Masai, Senior  Engineer, Com-
  bustion  Systems, Thermal Power De-
  sign Dept., Babcock-Hitachi, K.K. Kure,
  Hiroshima, 737, Japan.
Charles C. Masser, U.S. Environmental
  Protection  Agency,  Air  and  Energy
  Engineering  Research   Laboratory,
  Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Mallory S.  May, Professional  Services
  and Management, 703  McKinney Ave.
  Suite 302, Dallas, TX 75202.
J. M. McCarthy, Energy and Environmen
  tal  Research Corp.,  18 Mason, Irvine
  CA 92718.
M. S. McCartney, Fossil  Power Systems
  Combustion  Engineering,  Inc.
  Windsor, CT 06095.
M. W. McElroy, Air Quality Control, Elec
  trie Power Research Institute, Palo Alt<
  CA 94303.
R. W.  McGraw, Pennsylvania  Electr
  Co., Johnstown, PA  16907.
Claire  E.  McHale,  Riley Stoker Corf
  P.O. Box 547, Worcester, MA 01613.
R. McMillan,  Foster  Wheeler  Deve
  opment Corp.,  12  Peachtree  Re
  Livingston, NJ 07039.
Shigehiro Miyamae, Boilers Resear
  and Development  Dept.,  Boiler Pie
  Div., Ishikawajima  Harima  Hea
  Industries Co., Ltd.,  3-13,  5-Chorr
  Toyo, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135, Japan.
Shigeki  Morita,  Leader  Engine<
  Combustion  Systems,  Thermal Pov
  Design  Dept., Babcock-Hitachi,  K
  Kure, Hiroshima, 737, Japan.
Dominick J.  Mormile,  Consolidal
  Edison  Co. of New York,  Inc., 4 Irv
  Place, New York, NY 10003.
James A. Mulholland, U.S. Environme
  Protection  Agency,  Air  and  Ene
  Engineering  Research  Laboratory,
  search Triangle Park, NC  27711.
Sam N.  Nahas, Applied  Utility  Syste
  Inc.,  1720 E. Garry Ave., Suite  .'
  Santa Ana, CA 92705.
Yasuyuki Nakabayashi,  Research
  Engineering  Office,  Thermal PC
  Dept., Electric Power Development
  Ltd., Tokyo, 100, Japan.
                                                          12

-------
Tsuneo Narita,  Executive  Managing
 Director, Babcock-Hitachi, K. K., Tokyo,
 Japan.
P. Meeker,  Neckarwerke Elektrizitatsver-
  sorgungs-AG, D-7300  Esslingen,  West
  Germany.
James N. Nylander, San Diego Gas and
 Electric Co., 114 10th Ave.,  San Diego,
 CA 92112.
George R.  Often, Project  Manager,  Air
  Quality   Control,  Electric  Power
  Research Institute,  Palo Alto,  CA
  94303.
P. C. Orban, Pennsylvania Electric Co.,
  Johnstown, PA  16907.
Wesley W. Pepper, Dept. of Water and
  Power,  City  of Los  Angeles,  Los
  Angeles, CA 90012.
Richard B.  Perry, U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency, Air  and  Energy
  Engineering Research  Laboratory,
  Research Triangle Park, NC  27711.
David W. Pershing, Energy and Environ-
  mental  Research  Corp.,  18  Mason,
  Irvine, CA  92718.
J. Craig Phillips,  JCP Associates, Inc.,
 4480 7th St., Riverside, CA 92501.
Wallace S.  Pitts, III. Kilkelly  Environ-
  mental Associates, Raleigh,  NC 27622.
J. H. Pohl, Energy Systems  Associates,
 Tustin, CA 92680.
W.  M. Prosica,  United  Technologies
  Research Center,  E.  Hartford,  CT
  06108.
Greg C.  Quartucy,  KVB, Inc., 18006
  Skypark Blvd., Irvine, CA  92714.
Leslie  J.  Radak, Southern California
 Edison Co., Rosemead, CA 91770.
O. Rentz,  Institute for  Industrial Produc-
  tion,  Univ. of Karlsruhe, Hertzstrasse
  16, 7500  Karlsruhe  21,  Federal
  Republic of Germany.
Randall  Rush,  Southern Company
  Services, Birmingham, AL 35202.
M.  Sakai,  Manager,  Power  Systems
  Engineering  Research  and Promotion
  Laboratory,  Nagasaki  Research and
  Development Center, Mitsubishi Heavy
  Industries,  Ltd.,  180  Koyakimachi
  Nishisonogi-gun, Nagasaki, Japan.
Edmund S. Schindler,  Supervisor,  Emis-
  sion  Control  Engineering,  Foster
  Wheeler Energy Corp.,  Livingston, NJ
  07039.
W. R. Seeker, Energy, and Environmental
  Research Corp., 18  Mason, Irvine, CA
  92718.
D. J. Seery, United Technologies Re-
  search Center, E. Hartford, CT  06108.
Jack S. Siegel, Deputy Assistant  Secre-
 tary for Coal  Technology, U.S. Dept. of
 Energy, Washington, DC  20545.
Lowell L. Smith, Energy Technology Con-
 sultants, Irvine, CA  29715.
R. D. Snodgrass, Riley  Stoker Corp., P.O.
  Box 547, Worcester, MA 01613.
R. K. Srivastava, Acurex Corp.,  Durham,
  NC 27713.
K. Suyama,  Mitsubishi  Heavy Industries,
  America, Inc.,  c/o Combustion  Engi-
  neering,  Inc., 1000 Prospect  Hill Rd.,
  Windsor, CT  06095.
J.  Derek  Teare,  Dept.  of Chemical
 Engineering and the Energy Laboratory,
 Massachusetts Institute of  Technology,
 Cambridge, MA 02139.
Donald  P. Teixeira, Electric  Power
 Services  International,  Inc.,  Walnut
 Creek, CA 94596.
R.  E. Thompson, Fossil Energy Research
 Corp., Laguna Hills, CA 92653.
Dennis A.  Tirpak, U.S. Environmental
 Protection  Agency, Office of  Policy,
 Planning, and Evaluation  (Office of
 Policy  Analysis),  Washington, DC
 20460.
Majed  A.  Toqan,  Dept.  of Chemical
 Engineering  and  the  Energy
 Laboratory,  Massachusetts Institute of
 Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Joel  Vatsky,  Director, Combustion and
 Environmental  Systems, Foster-Wheeler
 Energy Corp., Livingston, NJ 07039.
John  H.  Wasser,  U.S.  Environmental
 Protection  Agency, Air and   Energy
 Engineering   Research  Laboratory,
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Alexander  Weir, Jr.,  Southern California
 Edison Co., Rosemead, CA 91770.
Jost  O. L. Wendt,  Dept. of Chemical
 Engineering, Univ.  of Arizona,  Tucson,
 AZ  85721.
Gerald L. Young, St. Marys Peerless Ce-
 ment Co., 9333 Dearborn  St.,  Detroit,
 Ml 48209.
 B. B. Emmel is with Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
 James D. Kllgroo is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
 The complete report consists of two volumes, entitled "Proceedings: 1987 Joint
   Symposium  on Stationary Combustion NOX  Control, New Orleans, LA,  March
   1987:"
     'Volume 1," (Order No. PB 89-139 695/AS; Cost: $42.95)
     'Volume 2." (Order No. PB 89-139 703/AS; Cost: $49.95)
 The above reports will be available only from: (Costs subject to change)
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                         13

-------
                                                          3>O
                                                          55
                                                          to o

                                                                        CD
                                                        K   «
                                                        o>   c
                                                            en
                                                            CD
                                                          u
                                                          8
                                                                        T>
                                                                        5

                                                                        I
                                                                        5'
                                                                      H
                                                                      i§
                                                                      en
                                                                      ro
                                                                      o>
                                                                      oo
c a. =

32*
i&i
2.of

5?
  m
 . n
               Cl
               OO  •*<»
                     95 U>
                    HI  H
                  HW  H
                  r-wi  2
                    w  «
                  ChH
                  O   »•

-------