United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-86/015c  June 1986
&ERA         Project Summary
                   Coal  Gasification
                   Environmental  Data
                   Summary:   Solid Wastes  and
                   By-Product  Tars
                   A. Gwen Eklund
                     This report is one of several data
                   summary reports on environmental as-
                   pects and pollutants specific to coal
                   gasification. It addresses characteris-
                   tics of solid wastes (ash and cyclone
                   dust) and by-product tars and oils ana-
                   lyzed in nine EPA source tests and eval-
                   uation studies and limited other data.
                   The objectives of this report were to
                   compile and summarize solid waste
                   properties and identify behavioral
                   trends. The results of this data compila-
                   tion showed that gasifier ash and  cy-
                   clone dust are nonhazardous under
                   RCRA and negative according to  se-
                   lected bioassay tests.  However, ash
                   compositions differed with different
                   processes, operating conditions, and
                   feedstocks. Tars and oils are more likely
                   to pose environmental problems due to
                   detectable concentrations of polynu-
                   clear aromatic compounds, other toxic
                   and carcinogenic organic compounds,
                   and entrained trace elements. How-
                   ever, high heating values of tars and
                   oils make them candidates for use as
                   fuels if the inorganic residues are
                   treated properly. Engineering and
                   leaching properties of gasifier solid
                   wastes are not sufficiently defined to
                   allow a good evaluation of disposal al-
                   ternatives.

                     This Project Summary was devel-
                   oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engineer-
                   ing Research Laboratory, Research Tri-
                   angle Park, NC, to announce key
                   findings of the research project that is
                   fully documented in a separate report
                   of the same title (see Project Report
                   ordering information at back).
 Introduction
  During the past decade, the EPA has
 conducted many data acquisition stud-
 ies at synthetic fuel facilities in order to
 characterize the different processes and
 discharge streams. These data have
 been used to evaluate applicable  con-
 trol technologies and to estimate poten-
 tial discharge characteristics from com-
 mercial plants. Compilation of EPA's
 Environmental Assessment data allows
 identification of potential environmen-
 tal problems and special monitoring
 needs for specific synfuel  processes.
 Under the Energy Security Act, the EPA
 will use these Environmental Assess-
 ments to advise on the adequacy of pro-
 posed Environmental Monitoring Plans
 and participate in Monitoring Review
 Committee activities for projects receiv-
 ing financial assistance from the Syn-
thetic Fuels Corporation (SFC).
  This report is one of several data sum-
 mary reports on environmental aspects
and pollutants specific to coal gasifica-
tion. It addresses characteristics of solid
wastes (ash and cyclone dust) and by-
 product tars and oils from synthetic fuel
facilities studied by the U.S. EPA and
others. The  facilities discussed here
were selected on the basis of greater
availability of process, gas, liquid, and
solid phase data. These processes in-
clude: Chapman  (low-Btu), two
Wellman-Galusha (low-Btu), Riley  Gas
Producer (low-Btu), Foster-Wheeler/
STOIC (low-Btu), Lurgi-type (medium-
Btu),  Kellogg-Rust/Westinghouse
(medium-Btu, funded by the Gas Re-
search Institute), two Koppers-Totzek

-------
(medium-Btu), and Texaco (medium-
Btu, funded jointly by EPA, TVA, and
EPRI).
  The conversion of coal to gaseous
fuels results in the generation of large
quantities of solid waste that must be
used beneficially or disposed of in an
environmentally acceptable manner.
Commercial-scale coal conversion facil-
ities are uncommon in the U.S.; thus,
practical experience with, and research
on, coal  conversion solid wastes has
been  limited.  Fundamental environ-
mental questions about these  wastes
are related to elemental partitioning in
gasification systems and to the mobility
of components  in gasification solid
wastes when contacted by aqueous so-
lutions during  disposal. Differences in
feed coal and process conditions affect
the composition and teachability of
these wastes; therefore,  proper dis-
posal  cannot be dictated by the nature
of the conversion process alone or the
feedstock alone.  Coal conversion solid
wastes that are demonstrably  similar,
both physically and chemically,  to well-
characterized combustion wastes will
probably be handled in the same man-
ner as combustion wastes.
  Data from the source testing and eval-
uation studies for the solid waste  by-
products include: elemental composi-
tion of  components, radioactive
speciation, organic analysis, evaluation
of leaching  potential, health  and
ecology-based bioassays, and a limited
array  of physical properties related to
handling and disposal characteristics.
These data are evaluated  in this report
for general trends in behavior and pos-
sible  correlations with  processes.
Although composition and leaching po-
tentials differ for the conversion  pro-
cesses, general trends will be useful in
determining disposal and monitoring
requirements.
Objectives
  This report addressed the characteris-
tics of coal gasification solid wastes and
by-product tars and oils analyzed dur-
ing nine EPA source tests and evalua-
tion studies.
  Major objectives of this report  in-
clude: (1) compilation and summary of
characteristics of solid wastes and
streams—ash, cyclone  dust, and  by-
product tar and oil  from gasifiers;
(2) evaluation of behavioral trends in
data  with respect to processes; and
(3) identification of unresolved issues.
Results and Conclusions
  The major solid waste streams from
gasification processes  include coarse
ash or slag and cyclone dust. The major
solid process streams likely to be dis-
charged are by-product tar and oil.
  The gasifier ash  and cyclone dust
originate primarily from the  inorganic
components  in  the coal. Data  have
demonstrated that these materials are
non-hazardous under the  criteria and
test procedures of the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  How-
ever, the physical characteristics and
the composition  of the waste can vary
widely as a function of process configu-
ration, operation, coal  feed  composi-
tion, and coal handling. In  addition,
these solids do not exhibit a hazardous
biological response in bioassays.
  When values for elemental concentra-
tions in ashes from this series of source
tests are generally  compared to ele-
mental  compositions found  in  other
gasifier ashes, ranges of elements  in the
waste residues are generally similar.
Available physical properties data, such
as densities and particle size distribu-
tions, for gasifier ashes are closer to
conventional  combustion  bottom ash
than fly ash properties. Other studies
have shown that slags  produced  from
gasification and  conventional combus-
tion are also similar. These results sug-
gest that gasifier slags may not require
solid waste management practices sub-
stantially different from those currently
used for coal  combustion solid wastes
solely based on the elemental composi-
tional data for the  slags.  Until  unre-
solved issues  are better defined, testing
should be on  a case by case basis.
  Elemental concentration ranges  in cy-
clone dusts from these source tests are
comparable to ranges  found in  other
gasifier  wastes analyzed in other  stud-
ies. The cyclone dust is also similar in
composition  to  the gasifier ash. Ele-
ments enriched in the cyclone dusts in-
cluded lead, tin, zinc, antimony, and ar-
senic for most of the EPA Source
Testing  of gasifiers.
  The cyclone dust, the finest fraction of
the gasifier solid waste, resembles con-
ventional fly  ash. These wastes have
also been shown to be morphologically
similar based on scanning  electron mi-
crographs. This similarity extends to
major oxide constituents:  SiO2, AI2O3,
and CaO. Proximate/ultimate analyses
of cyclone dusts generally had high
heating values (as high as > 10,900 Btu/
Ib), indicating that recycle as a fuel may
be a viable alternative to disposal. Alter-
natively, since they have high heating
values, they might be used as fuels.
  Polynuclear  aromatic compounds
(PNAs)  contribute greatly to possible
environmental  problems of  discharge
streams containing tar and  oil. These
streams include heavy tar solid wastes
and gaseous discharges from  areas
where tar makes up a large  portion of
paniculate  matter discharged. Ben-
zo(a)pyrene  is one of the most poten-
tially hazardous PNAs identified in gasi-
fier tars. Besides containing toxic or
carcinogenic organic compounds, tars
also contain many trace  elements.
Therefore, tar and oil streams are poten-
tially hazardous and may require careful
disposal. Alternatively, since they have
high heating values, they might be used
as fuels.
  Proximate/ultimate  analyses of the
gasifier by-product tars  indicate high
heating values  which may encourage
use of these wastes as a combustion
fuel rather than codisposal with other
solid wastes. However, metals could be
an environmental concern with inciner-
ation  due to concentration enhance-
ment  in the  final residue. High carbon
and volatiles may indicate a  possibility
of a hazardous  waste classification ac-
cording to the ignitability characteristic.
  Engineering  properties of  gasifier
slag, cyclone dusts, tars, and oils have
not been well defined;  however, slag
and dust appear similar to conventional
coal combustion wastes and are likely
to be landfilled using current  technol-
ogy. Tars and oils could be codisposed
with solid wastes,  although this  might
affect their RCRA classification. (Under
RCRA, tars and  some oils probably will
be  evaluated as solid  wastes.)  Obvi-
ously, utilization of these streams is
preferable to disposal.
  Detailed characterization  and  leach-
ing data are needed to relate waste
properties to process types and vari-
ables.  In evaluating possible environ-
mental problems from leaching of these
wastes, the RCRA Extraction  Procedure
Extracts and the ASTM  Extracts did not
exceed the established criteria. Al-
though ash-slags would be classified as
"nonhazardous" under currently pro-
posed RCRA criteria, soil attenuation
experiments would permit a better as-
sessment of actual  impacts to affected
ground and surface  water systems.
Some studies of this type are already
underway at Oak Ridge National Labo-
ratory. In general, leaching  studies of

-------
gasifier ashes have shown that both in-
organic elements and polynuclear aro-
matic hydrocarbons in the leachates are
relatively low and at this  time appear
not to be of significant environmental
concern.  The major environmental im-
pact associated with disposal of these
wastes may be the sulfate dissolution
and  potential acidification of  ground-
water. However, studies of soil attenua-
tion  of soluble constituents  leached
from coal conversion solid wastes have
shown that soil properties control the
degree of attenuation to a greater extent
than the  chemical composition of the
waste leachates.
  To better assess disposal constraints,
engineering and physical properties
(e.g., permeability, load bearing capac-
ity, strength, and flow properties) would
have to be evaluated. To determine the
effects on the  environment of  these
wastes in a given disposal site, bench
scale and field studies may be required.
These field data, in conjunction with
comprehensive characterizations of
wastes and  their leaching properties,
may be used to predict leaching and at-
tenuation behavior of mobile pollu-
tants. Design and operation guidelines
for coal gasification waste disposal sites
should consider the chemical and phys-
ical characteristics  of the waste, and
their behavior in the environment.
A. G. Eklundis with Radian Corporation. Austin, TX 78766.
William J. Rhodes is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Coal Gasification Environmental Data Summary:
  Solid Wastes and By-Product Jars.." (Order No. PB 86-192 283/AS; Cost:
  $16.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
       National Technical Information Service
       5285 Port Royal Road
       Springfield, VA 22161
       Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
       Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Ny  "  "  '   f", "~Tr:,-,-,-.- —
'V\  rr;> T.' :  i; S Mi!,;^"...J:
                                                                                                                     L
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S7-86/015C
                   0000329     PS

                   U  S  ENVIR  PROTECTION  AGENCY
                   REGION  5   LIBRARY
                   230  &  DEARBORN  STREET
                   CHICAGO                  IL    
-------