United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S7-87/014  July 1987
&EPA          Project  Summary

                    Status and  Evaluation  of
                    Calcitic  S02 Capture:
                    Analysis of  Facilities
                    Performance
                    G. D. Silcox, S. L Chen, W. D. Clark, J. C. Kramlich, J. F. LaFond,
                    J. M. McCarthy, D. W. Pershing, and W. R. Seeker
                     This study was initiated to character-
                    ize the current state of  knowledge
                    regarding SO2 capture by  dry calcitic
                    sorbent injection. A key difficulty in
                    reviewing the literature on the subject
                    is the apparent diversity in the exper-
                    imental results, caused by the extreme
                    complexity of simulating the practical
                    sorbent utilization  process. Variables
                    include sorbent properties, furnace
                    experimental parameters, and furnace
                    equipment (e.g., injectors, sampling
                    system). Failure to control  or report all
                    possible variables in each  experiment
                    produces a diversity of results.
                     In this project, the experimental data
                    on dry sorbent injection are compiled
                    and critically compared. Sulfation and
                    activation models are developed and
                    used to identify sorbent properties and
                    furnace environment parameters likely
                    to be of importance. The results of the
                    examination  of data  and  the  model
                    evaluation indicated areas  where orig-
                    inal experimental work could be applied
                    to resolve key issues. The experimental
                    portion of  the program  developed
                    information on injection temperature,
                    quench rate, and sorbent properties.
                    These  results are used to define the
                    overall optimum injection condition for
                    a variety of furnace configurations.
  This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engi-
neering Research Laboratory, Research
Triangle  Park. NC, to  announce key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
  This report summarizes the theoretical
and experimental studies conducted by
EER as part of the  Combustion System
Similarity Criteria Modeling Study.
Objectives of the study were:

• To compile and compare existing data
   on dry sorbent  injection  for SO2
   control as a function of experimental
   scale,  sorbent type, injection condi-
   tions, etc.

• To identify differences in experimental
   results and, where possible, to rec-
   oncile these discrepancies in terms of
   experimental system characteristics.

• To develop overall sulfation models
   which include consideration of the
   physical and chemical processes likely
   to be of major importance  in upper
   furnace injection of dry calcium-based
   sorbents and to validate these models
   using existing fundamental data.

-------
• To use the overall sulfation models in
   conjunction  with the experimental
   data to define the process fundamen-
   tals, establish combustion parameters
   critical to the overall optimization of
   sorbent  injection, and  define the
   optimum sorbent injection conditions.

Thus, the overall purpose of the program
was to characterize the current state of
knowledge regarding S02 capture by dry
sorbent injection by carefully analyzing
the existing experimental data  base in
conjunction with appropriate mathemat-
ical models and newly acquired exper-
imental results.

Modeling Approach
  The first step in  the sorbent injection
process is  calcination of the  injected
hydrate or carbonate to form porous CaO.
An activation model includes consider-
ation of calcium carbonate decomposi-
tion at the CaO/CaCOa interface,  diffu-
sion of CO2  through the  CaO to  the
particle surface, diffusion of CO2from the
particle surface to the bulk gas, and
continuous finite-rate surface area loss
for all calcined material. The calcination
process is  represented  by  a spherical
shrinking-cjore model with the  intrinsic
calcination  rate dependent  only on  the
chemical rate.
  Two sulfation  models  were  used
extensively on this program:  a  grain
model and a distributed pore model. Both
approaches assume that the  reactive
particles are spherical and fully calcined
to CaO prior to the  onset of sulfation.

Activation
  The activation step is of major impor-
tance to the overall  sulfation  process
because it controls the physical charac-
teristics of  the sorbent at the onset of
sulfation; in particular, the availablesur-
f ace area and porosity. Three phenomena
appear to be of major significance  in the
overall activation process: (1) the  calci-
nation  rate; (2) the local development of
high surface area associated with metas-
table CaO;  and  (3) the sintering  of
previously formed CaO catalyzed by HzO,
CO2, and probably sulfate ions with  its
associated grain  (pore) growth and
porosity loss.  Hydrates and carbonates
are found  to  have markedly  different
calcination rates. Coupled with this is the
concurrent  sintering or desurfacing of
the sorbent, which.also proceeds at a
rapid rate.
  Figure 1  shows activation model
predictions on surface area development
and loss for typical hydrate and carbonate
   100
 I
    40
    20 -
     0.0001
 Figure 1.    Activation model predictions.
particles at 1100°C. These data clearly
indicate why the activation process can
have a  strong influence on the overall
extent of calcium utilization. The hydrate
particles calcine so rapidly that the rate
of calcination and surface  area develop-
ment far exceed  the  rate of sintering;
hence, there exists regions of very high
surface area.  In contrast, the 5/jm
carbonate particle calcines much slower,
and the sintering front can more closely
follow the calcination front through the
particle. At higher temperatures with
even larger  carbonate particles,  the
model  predicts a simple steady rise in
surface area  because sintering follows
calcination completely.

Sulfation
   Figure 2 summarizes  time-resolved
sulfation  data for sized, precalcined
sorbents prepared from both  hydrates
and carbonates. These data characterize
the  sulfation  process   specifically
because sulfation has been decoupled
from calcination  by using  precalcined
materials. Initial sulfation is very rapid;
most of .the calcium is utilized in the first
200 ms. Subsequently the  process slows
dramatically,  and further sulfation is
relatively limited. Thus, some  chemical
or physical mechanism rapidly reduces
the  calcium availability or accessibility
and  limits the overall SO2 capture.  The
solid line  shows  the distributed pore
model  predictions for the four different
size particles. In each case the measured
pore size  distribution  of  the injected
material was used to define the pore size
distribution in the model. No parameters
were adjusted to improve the agreement
between the model and the experimental
data.  These  results suggest  that  the
distributed pore model can predict the
form and the level of the time-resolved
SOzcapture data. Detailed analysis of the
model  predictions  indicates that,  the
slowing in the  overall sulfation  rate at
times beyond about 200 ms, the overajl
sulfation rate  slows because of  a
decrease  in  both  calcium  availability
(resulting from catalyzed thermal sinter-
ing) and calcium accessibility (resulting
from  mouth closure of  the  smallest
pores).

Influence of Process
Parameters
  Temperature has a strong influence on
calcination, thermal sintering,  pore and
product layer diffusion, and probably the
intrinsic  chemical  reaction. Therefore,
influence  of  both  sorbent injection
temperature and downstream  thermal
profile have been studied extensively in
previous programs. The observed capture
levels  (at  a Ca/S  molar ratio of 2  foi
hydrated lime) range from 25 to 65%, anc
optimum injection  temperature appears
to be about 1120°C. An absolutely critica
point in resolving the optimum injectior
temperature  from the various  experi-
ments is evaluating the peak  tempera
ture experienced  by the sorbent. Foi
example, in some experiments maximurr
utilization was obtained at  1260°C

-------
    20
    10
  c
  o
  2 concentration.

-------
   60
   SO
   40
©
£
a 30
Q.
O
CO
   20
   10
—  Open Symbols: Linwood AH
   Solid Symbols: Vicron
Figure  3.
1800'
                          2000'

                             I
                             2200

                               I
                                2400
                                                          2600
                           r;oo
                                              7300
                                                       /400
                                                         7500
     Comparison of the impact of quench rate on sorbent infection temperature for
     Linwood hydrate and Vicron carbonate.

-------
  60
  50

-------
     G. D. Silcox, S. L Chen, W. D. Clark. J. C. Kramlich, J. F. LaFond. J. M. h,,^*,.,,,,
     D. W. Pershing, and W. R. Seeker are with Energy and Environmental Research
     Corporation, Irvine, CA 92718-2798.
     Charles C. Masser is the EPA  Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report entitled "Status and Evaluation of Calcitic SOZ Capture:
     Analysis  of Facilities Performance," (Order No. PB 87-194 783/AS; Cost:
     $30.95, subject to change)
     will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S7-87/014

-------