United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
 Municipal Environmental Researc
 Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
EPA-600/S2-81-016  Mar. 1981
Project  Summary
Chlorination  of  Aquatic
Humic  Substances
R. F. Christman, J. D. Johnson, D. L Norwood, W. T. Liao, J. R. Hass, F. K.
Pfaender, M. R. Webb, and M. J. Bobenrieth
  The overall objective of this research
program  was  to  increase  our
understanding of the chemical struc-
tures of aquatic humic material and
their behavior during chemical oxida-
tion, in particular with chlorine.
  Experimental methods devised to
isolate humic and fulvic acid fractions
from natural surface waters involved
classical precipitation of humic acids
from large volumes of raw water, fol-
lowed  by  concentration  through
settling and centrifugation. Fulvic acid
materials  were  concentrated  by
adsorption on macroreticular  XAD-2
resin followed by base elution. The
controlled oxidation of these samples
with solutions of potassium perman-
ganate (KMnO4) and aqueous chlorine
was followed by solvent extraction,
formation  of methyl  esters,  and
GC/MS analysis.  The criteria  for
identifying degradation products with
the use of  low resolution El,  high
resolution El,  and Cl mass spectro-
metry are included in appended mate-
rial.  Results of the whole-sample
degradation experiments also dictated
how chlorination  experiments were
conducted  on  selected   model
compounds.

  This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's  Municipal Environ-
mental Research Laboratory,  Cincin-
nati. OH 45268, to announce key
findings of the research project that is
fully documented in a separate report
of the same title (see Project  Report
ordering information at back).
Introduction

  Aquatic humic  material has  been
heavily implicated as an  important
reaction precursor of trihalomethanes
in natural water systems exposed to
chlorine. It  has been assumed that
humic  materials  are   ubiquitously
present in  natural waters and  have
sufficient chemical similarity in time
and space to account for the observed
property of producing trichloromethane
(CHCIs) when  exposed to chlorine.
Further, it has been assumed that the
mechanism of the chlorine (ClzJ-humic
interaction involves the classical  halo-
form reaction and that trihalomethanes
are the principal reaction  products.
Public and governmental concern over
the presence of CHCIa in drinking water
has  focused  attention  to  this
phenomena, and the aforementioned
assumptions have been made because
of inadequacies in our scientific under-
standing of the fundamental chemical
structures present in aquatic humic
materials and, therefore, the reactions
of these structures with chlorine.
  The  research described in the full
report focuses on the chemical charac-
terization of the reactions of aquatic
humic materials with hypochlorousacid
(HOCI),  and  the report begins with a
comprehensive  literature review. The
experimental approach involved (1)the
chemical degradation of natural aquatic
humic material to gain insight into the
dominant chemical structures  in this
natural  product material, (2) the reac-
tion of  HOCI with model compounds

-------
having structures similar to the degra-
dation products, and (3) the identifica-
tion   of  nonvolatile  chlorinated and
nonchlorinated degradation products of
natural aquatic humics with HOCI.
  Each  experimental direction is de-
scribed  separately,  although the
experimental  planning  was heavily
influenced  by the results of current
work. For instance, early model com-
pound  work  established that  total
trihalomethanes  were a minor portion
of the  total  chlorine demand  and,
subsequently, only less volatile reaction
products were emphasized in the actual
humic chlorination experiments. Simi-
larly,  the  dominance   of  aromatic
products in the  oxidative degradation
mixtures resulted in the  exclusion of
aliphatic compounds in the model com-
pound experiments.
  The  oxidative   degradation
experiments  reported  here  have
generated significantly more chemical
structural information on aquatic humic
material than was previously available
in the literature.  Controlled  oxidation
with KMnOa followed by solvent extrac-
tion, formation  of methyl esters, and
GC/MS analysis  has established that
the  principal  identified  degradation
products of aquatic humic  acid are
aromatic polybasic acids, some of which
are   hydroxylated.  The  degradation
mixture also contains a complex mix-
ture of aliphatic mono- and dibasic acids
in lesser concentrations. Although most
of the chromatographable degradation
products were tentatively identified (low
resolution El, high resolution El, Cl mass
spectrometry), only 20 to 30 wt.% of the
original  humic carbon is accounted  for
by the identified products. The chemical
data   generated in this study do not
provide a fully adequate scientific basis
for  modeling   humic  structures.
However,  a hypothetical  structure is
presented that would account for the
observed data.


Results and Conclusions
  Direct  chlorination of both aquatic
humic materials and model compounds
shown to be major component parts of
the aquatic humic and fulvic  materials
produced  chloroform.  Because
dihydroxy aromatic configurations were
significant  contributors to the humic
macromolecular structure, the reaction
of resorcinol  with HOCI  was investi-
gated carefully  as a  model.  A cyclic
chlorinated diketone intermediate was
identified along with other non-CHCIa
reaction products. In addition to chloro-
form, a large number of chlorinated and
nonchlorinated  acids,  phenols, and
ketones were produced. Ring cleavage
products such as saturated and unsatu-
rated aliphatic mono- and dicarboxylic
acids were major products of model as
well as natural humic materials. Only
small portions (8 to  17 wt.% of total
organic carbon,  TOC) of the aquatic
humic material subjected to high pH and
excess chlorine yielded products identi-
fiable  by GC/MC  (Table  1).  Thus,
although hypochlorite (OCI~)  is a signifi-
cant degrader of the humic macromole-
cule, it is not as effective as alkaline
KMnO«. The majority of the identified
chlorine  degradation  products were
nonchlorinated  aliphatic acids. The
aromatic acids  are  primarily polycar-
boxylic, suggesting carbon substituted
on the aromatic rings at three or more
sites in the undegraded macromolecule;
this  agrees with the KMnO* data.  No
chlorinated aromatic compounds were
identified, however.
  Aquatic humic materials are thus
shown to be important precursors of not
only chloroform but also a large number
of other chlorinated and nonchlorinated
organic compounds. Although aromatii
compounds dominate both the KMnO
and HOCI degradation products, theydi
not appear to chlorinate directly. Thi
experimental procedures used in thi
study have shown significant promisi
as a tool for increasing scientific under
standing of fundamental aquatic humi
chemistry. More structural informatioi
can  be  gained  through   additions
research on  increased oxidative yieli
and  extraction and  separation  effi
ciencies. A  method for following thi
changes  in  macromolecular   size/
polarity during  the degradation wouli
be extremely useful.
  The  development of the technique
reported here permits an even wide
range  of  useful experimentation
Questions to evaluate include (1) di
fulvic acids (most of the TOC) yield quali
tatively  and   quantitatively  simila
results, (2) do the chemical properties o
the  humic  and fulvic fractions  van
seasonally for any source, and (3) wha
chemical  variability  exists  betweei
natural water sources? In addition, thi
effect  of  oxidant/disinfectants  othe
than OCf on humic structures shoul<
be evaluated.
Table 1.    Non - Volatile Products of A quatic Humic A cid Chlorination Product Identi
            fications and Relative Yields Ether Extract (Methyl Esters)3
   Scan. No.
     from
   Figure 44  Assigned Structure
                    Ethyl Acetate
  Ether Extract*         Extract*
 Relative Yield %    Relative Yield %
Peak Weight (C)/   Peak Weight (C)/
  Total Weight C     Total Weight C
      7      CH3CHzCH(CH3)COOCH3

             RCH2COOCH3
      1 1     CH3CHCICOOCH3

      16     CHCI2COOCH3

     22*     CCI3COOCH3

      22     CI2C=CHCOOCH3

   26,37,40  Chlorinated Aliphatic
             Methyl Esters

             CH3OOCCH2COOCH3

             CH3OOCCH=CHCOOCH3
      n.d.c



      28.4

      14.7

       9.6

      n.d.


       3.4
n.d.
 0.5
                          0.2

                          0.1

-------
Table 1 . Continued
Ether Extract*
Scan. No. Relative Yield %
from Peak Weight (C)/
Figure 44 Assigned Structure Total Weight C
44
52"
63
-
66
69

77
84
84

88
96
100

115
120.125

151
CHaOOCCHzCHsCOOCH,
^ \COOCH3
CH3OOCCH=CCICOOCH3
CH3OOCCH=CHCOOCH3
CH3OOCCHZCHCICOOCH3
CHzCICHCICOOCH3 or
CHCI2CH2COOCH3
Aliphatic Methyl Ester
CH3OOCCH=CCICOOCH3
CH3OOCC3H3CICOOCH3 +
CH3OOCC2H2CI2COOCH3
Isomer of above compounds
CH3OOCCCI=CCICOOCH3
CH3OOCC3H3CICOOCH3 +
CH3OOCC3H3RCOOCH3
CtHgCOOCHa
«pf0/y,
/— \ CHa
^=*&(OH)3

0.2
4.1
1.6
—
0.2

0.1
0.3
0.4

4.7
0.1
0.9

0.5
0.1

2.6
2.3
Ethyl Acetate
Extract*
Relative Yield %
Peak Weight (C)/
Total Weight C
0.7
—
5.2
0.2
—

—
—
2.2

—
—
—

—
—



159"
163"
0.9
0.5
                                                      3.8
          COOCH3

-------
Table 1.    Continued
   Scan. No.
     from
   Figure 44  Assigned Structure
                              Ether Extract*
                            Relative Yield %
                            Peak Weight (C)/
                              Total Weight C
              Ethyl Acetate
                Extract"
            Relative Yield %
            Peak Weight (C)/
             Total Weight C
      168




      187

      198

      230



     255s
          COOCH3
      COOCH3
CH3OOCCC/=C(COOCH3)2
C6(OCH3)6

    COOCH3

       rCOOCH3
0.8




2.9

0.5

1.7


5.4
                 COOCH3

                      COOCH3

                       COOCH3

                    COOCH3
 1.0

14.5
                                                      2.2
255
265s

265
274

304
321"


330
355
370
408
CeH9OsCI3
COOCH3
HsCOOC COOCr/3
CsHdCH3)(coocHa)a
CeH^CHzCOOCHa)
(COOCH3)3 +
unknown chlorine compound
CeH3(COOCH3)3
COOCHa
0COOCH3
COOCHa
C6Hi(COOCH3)<
• CeWCOOCHa)*
C6Hi(COOCH3)*
CBH(COOCH3)5
n.d.
1.9

0.2

0.2
0.3
1.0


0.9
0.4
0.3
0.3
—
—

—

—
1.6
25.2


15.8
—
2.1
1.3
'Reaction Conditions: Total Volume=320 ml; Carbon Concentrations=420 mg/l; OCC/C Mole Ratio=X 1.0
 Chlorination Time=48 hr.
''For the individual extract.
c=not determined.
"—=not detected.
'Confirmed with matching spectra.

-------
R. F. Christman, J. D.  Johnson, D.  L. Norwood,  W. T. Liao, J. R. Mass, F. K.
  Pfaender, M. R. Webb, and M. J. Bobenrieth are with the University of North
  Carolina at Chanel Hill. Chanel Hill NC. 7 7.114
Alan A. Stevens is the EPA Project  Officer (see below).
me complete report, entitled "L'niormation or aquatic Humic Substances,"
  (Order No. PB 81-161 952; Cost: $15.50, subject to change) will be available
  only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield,  VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                                                                   > U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1M1-757-044/029*

-------

-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Postage and
Fees Paid
Environmental
Protection
Agency
EPA 335
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use 6300

Return Postage Guaranteed
PS
U  S
                                      0000329
                                      £NVIR  PROTECTION
                                           5 LIBRARY
                                230  S  DEARBORN STR£FT
                                CHICAGO II.  606U4

-------