United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Water Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-86/023  Apr. 1986
v>EPA         Project Summary
                   Large   Soil  Absorption   Systems
                   for  Wastewaters  from  Multiple-
                   Home   Developments

                   Robert L Siegrist, Damann L Anderson, and David L Hargett
                     A study was conducted to evaluate
                   community-scale soil absorption
                   systems for treating and disposing of
                   wastewaters. Included were a survey of
                   current state attitudes and policies, an
                   overview of a number of large soil
                   absorption systems, and an in-depth
                   analysis of  one system.  Study
                   objectives were to assess  the
                   performance  of  existing  large-scale
                   absorption systems, to comment on the
                   viability of presently  used  design
                   methods, and to suggest improved
                   approaches to design.
                     This Project Summary was developed
                   by EPA's Water Engineering Research
                   Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  OH,  to
                   announce key findings of the research
                   project  that is fully documented in a
                   separate report of the same  title (see
                   Project  Report ordering information at
                   back).
                   Introduction
                     Large  subsurface  soil  absorption
                   systems  (LSAS's) for  treatment  and
                   disposal of wastewater from subdivisions
                   and small communities are becoming
                   increasingly popular. These systems are
                   being designed as permanent means of
                   wastewater management, not as interim
                   solutions to be used until conventional
                   treatment technologies arrive.
                     The design and operation practices of
                   large,  multiple-home  soil absorption
                   systems appear simply  to have evolved
                   •from the laboratory and field experience
                   gained with small, single-home systems.
                   However, the suitability of this practice
                   remains  in   question   without  field
experience  involving  community-scale
systems. As the size of a subsurface soil
absorption system increases to handle
the wastewater from a small community,
the  design, construction,  and
management  practices  necessary  to
ensure acceptable performance become
less clear.

Procedures
  The objectives of this study were to
investigate  the performance  of
community-scale  soil absorption
systems, to identify potential deficiencies
in presently used design criteria, and to
develop  recommendations  regarding
design  and operation practices.  More
specifically, the project  endeavored to
accomplish the following.

  1. To determine the current attitudes,
    policies,  and level of  use of
    community-scale subsurface
    wastewater absorption systems;
  2. To  investigate in detail  the
    performance  characteristics of the
    community wastewater absorption
    system at Westboro, Wisconsin;
    and
  3. To characterize generally a number
    of  multiple-home wastewater
    absorption systems in Washington.

  This study was accomplished between
June 1981 and December 1983 through
the combined  efforts of staff members
from several organizations.

Conclusions
  1.  Design infiltration rates for long-
    term  successful   operation of
     LSAS's are not well defined.

-------
     2. Anaerobic  conditions  may
       predominate below  LSAS's, even
       in sandy  soils.  Narrow,  shallow
       trenches may be required to obtain
       aerobic environments.
     3. Septic tank  effluent  may  load
       LSAS's too heavily, requiring a
       higher degree   of  treatment  to
       remove   excess  organics,
       suspended  solids,  etc.,  before
       LSAS treatment.  Criteria  for
       individual  home  wastewater
       systems are clearly inadequate for
       LSAS's.
     4. Groundwater   mounding  may
       present a severe  hindrance  to
       proper wastewater  treatment  by
       the  LSAS.  Present methods  of
       predicting  the  degree  of
       groundwater  mounding   under-
       estimated  the  actual  conditions
       found.
     5. Percolation  testing  as presently
       practiced was inadequate for LSAS
       design, and  the use  of vertical
       hydraulic  conductivity  curves for
       long-term  acceptance  rates was
       also in error.

   Recommendations
     Based on this study,  the following
   recommendations  are  made  for
   engineering LSAS systems:


  Site Evaluation
     1. Use professional soil scientists.
     2. Inspect soil morphology to a depth
       of at  least 2 m  below the system
       bottom.
     3. Allow at least 1.5 m of unsaturated
       soil below the system bottom.
       Design
         1. Flow should be based on design
            population.
         2. Shallow trenches should be used
            instead of beds.
         3. A minimum of three  absorption
            systems should be used to permit
            resting cycles.
         4. Infiltration rates  should  be
            conservative and based on  entire
            site soil morphology and hydraulic
            capacity.

       Installation
         1. Installation  should be accomplish-
            ed  as  quickly  as   possible  to
            minimize   exposure  of  the
            infiltrative surface.
         2. Construction   machinery  (either
            tired  or tracked) travel  over  the
            infiltrative   area  should  be
            prohibited, even if a thin layer of
            gravel or sand covers that surface.
Operation
  Rotate systems between  resting  and
dosing on an annual basis, avoiding cold
weather rotation;  or  initiate  system
resting at the first sign of ponding.

Monitoring
   1. Monitor  LSAS  influent flows at
     least  monthly  to  determine
     loadings.
   2. Characterize  influent  COD, TSS,
     NH4, pH and grease initially and at
     least annually thereafter.
   3. Inspect  LSAS's for ponding and
     dosing at least monthly.
   4. Monitor groundwater elevations at
     least quarterly.

  The full report was submitted in partial
fulfillment of Contract No. 68-03-3057
by  Rural  Systems  Engineering,  Inc.,
under  the sponsorship  of the  U.S.
Environmental  Protection Agency.
         Robert L Siegrist, Damann L. Anderson, and David L Hargett are with RSE Group,
           Madison, Wl 53704.
         James F. Kreissl is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
         The complete report, entitled "Large Soil Absorption Systems for Wastewaters
           from Multiple-Home Developments," (Order No. PB  86-164 084/AS; Cost:
           $16.95, subject to change) will be available only from:
                 National Technical Information Service
                 5285 Port Royal/Road
                 Springfield, VAJ&161
                 Telephone: 703*487-4650
         The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
                 Water Engineering Research Laboratory
                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                 Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
              >'\        : si <* f!jieT».f
              -•,T-W,LTV j li.V.'-UvMMS

                           r;   o ?•
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S2-86/023
        0000329    PS
                                        'GeNCY

-------
                     United States
                     Environmental Protection
                     Agency
Water Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
                     Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-86/025 May 1986
&EPA          Project  Summary

                     Microbial   Activity  in
                     Composting  Municipal
                     Sewage  Sludge
                     J. Robie Vestal and Vicky L McKinley
                       Research was conducted to identify the
                     most important operational parameters
                     that limit the growth and decomposition
                     activity of composting sludge microbiota.
                     Sensitive and  nonselective  biochemical
                     methods of monitoring microbial biomass
                     and activity were tested and used to study
                     the interactions between the microbial
                     communities and temperature, the primary
                     factor affecting their activity during com-
                     posting.  Optimum  temperatures  for
                     microbial activity and  biomass were
                     generally within the 35° to 55 °C range.
                     Biokinetic analyses revealed that compost
                     samples from  low-temperature (25° to
                     45 °C) areas of the pile had much greater
                     microbial activity (measured as the rate of
                     incorporation or mineralization of (14C)
                     substrates) than did samples from high-
                     temperature (60°  to  75°C) areas. The
                     microbial communities  became better
                     adapted to increasing temperatures  as
                     composting progressed,  but their tem-
                     perature optimum was never greater than
                     55 °C. Biomass was monitored by measur-
                     ing the lipid phosphate content (an impor-
                     tant cell membrane component) of  the
                     compost. Other parameters that were
                     measured included the moisture content,
                     total organic content, total protein con-
                     tent, and pH.
                       This Project  Summary was developed
                     by EPA's Water Engineering  Research
                     Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, to announce
                     key findings of the research project that
                     is fully documented in a separate report
                     of the same title (see Project Report order-
                     ing information at  back).


                     Introduction
                       Large aggregations of organic-rich mat-
                     ter have long been  known to heat up and
become  increasingly humified over ex-
tended periods. These effects are brought
about by the activity of the indigenous
microbial community, which decomposes
the usable matter for energy and growth
substrates, producing metabolic heat as a
byproduct. In organic piles of sufficient
size and  insulation, this  metabolic heat is
trapped and can elevate the temperatures
within the pile to in excess of 80 °C within
a few days. The production of composted
material through this process has been a
means of recycling organic waste products
throughout much of history. Recently the
process has become an  important means
of disposing of municipal solid waste and
sewage sludge. The primary goals of com-
posting in solid waste management are to
rapidly reduce the pathogens,  odors,
putrescible organic matter, moisture, and
bulk, and to produce a biologically stabil-
ized material.
  No general agreement has  yet been
reached  on the best conditions and pro-
cedures  for optimizing  the efficiency of
decomposition (stabilization) during the
composting process, so a wide variety of
methods  are currently practiced. However,
temperature  is generally agreed  to  be
the most critical parameter influencing the
rate of composting and  the quality of the
product,  given reasonable initial environ-
mental conditions of moisture, free  air
space, pH and nutrients,  and provided that
oxygen  does not become generally
limiting.
  Many  of  the  findings on  optimum
temperatures for maximum decomposition
rate during composting have been in con-
flict. These discrepancies may be partly
due to the indirect and incomplete nature
of many of the studies concerning micro-
bial activity and biomass in composting

-------
material. Direct comparisons of decom-
position  rate  between  different tem-
perature regimes  require  experimental
arrangements unrelated to the practice of
composting  and produce unrealistic re-
sults. Estimates  of microbial  decom-
position  in  composting  material have
typically been made using such indirect
indices as the overall temperature of the
composting pile, odors, moisture content,
carbon dioxide evolution from the com-
posting  pile,  or  oxygen uptake  by  the
compostion pila In most cases, concurrent
assessments of microbial biomass were
not made, or they  were  aimed only at
quantifying  the numbers of  surviving
pathogens or other specific groups using
selective isolation techniques.
  The purpose of this  study was to pro-
vide a better understanding of the factors
influencing the microbial activities in com-
posting  sewage sludge. The activity  and
biomass of the microbial community as a
whole were accurately and consistently
measured to permit conclusions to be
made about an optimal temperature range
for rapid decomposition  during com-
posting. Basic information leading to a bet-
ter understanding  of rapid thermogenic
microbial successions was also obtained.

Results and Discussion
  Composting was done in a  full-sized
commercial composting bin using forced
aeration to regulate the overall temper-
atures of the piles. Each batch composting
run lasted approximately 2.5 weeks, dur-
ing which the material was removed  and
turned once or twice.
  The microbiota of composting municipal
sewage sludge from Columbus or Akron,
Ohio, was analyzed during 10 different
composting runs. A temperature gradient
existed  within the composting piles, with
the central areas near the surface of the
piles being the hottest. On each sampling
day, samples were taken from several dif-
ferent areas, each with a different sam-
pling temperature. In  every  case,  a
decrease in microbial activity occurred as
temperature  increased, with overall op-
timum temperatures falling between  35°
and  55 °C.  Microbial  activity  was
measured  as the  hourly rate of (14C)
acetate incorporation into microbial lipids
per /jmol of lipid phosphate biomass. The
changes in this microbial activity rate in
response to  compost sampling temper-
atures during run No. 6 (see Figure 1) are
typical. Microbial biomass also decreased
with increasing temperature in most of the
compostitig runs. The biomass data from
run No.  6 (Figure 2) are typical. The same
    0.14
    0.10
  I
  g 0.06
  ^

  |
  o

 ,$J 0.02
                           I
                          20
                                             40

                                  Temperature (°C)
                                                    60
Figure  1.
Microbial activity, measured as the rate ofC*C) acetate incorporation into lipids pe
hour per umol of lipid phosphate biomass x10'\ of pooled sewage sludge compoi
samples in response to the mean sampling temperature of the pooled sample
during composting run No. 6.  Sampling days are indicated by the number
associated with the data points. Activity values are the  mean ± one standar
deviation of three replicates.
trends in microbial activity were found for
all of the substrates tested ((14C) acetate,
glucose, and glutamate), and the results
were similar whether the data were ex-
pressed in terms of biomass (per /^mol of
lipid phosphate biomass) or in terms of the
amounts of compost  (per gram of dry
compost).
   Of all the physical  and chemical pa-
ramters  measured  during  this  study,
temperature had the most dramatic and
consistent effects on  microbial  biomass
and  activity.   Microbial activity  and
biomass also correlated with the pH of the
compost, indicating that pH may be an in-
direct indicator of microbial activity. The
typical increases in pH  during composting
are primarily a  result of microbial activity,
and  in addition, the microbiota may be
more  active  at  the  neutral-to-slightly
alkaline pH values found later in the runs.
This hypothesis was not tested directly
during this study, however.
   During four  of the  composting runs,
each composting pile  was divided into a
low-temperature section  (mean  pile
temperature ^L 55 ° to 60 °C) and a high-
temperature section  (mean  pile tem-
                             peratures up to 70 °C). Microbial activit
                             and  biomass  were higher in  the low
                             temperature section, even when sample:
                             taken from the high-temperature sectioi
                             came   from  the  same   samplm;
                             temperature.
                               An experiment was designed to deter
                             mine the optimum temperatures  for th<
                             activities of the microbial communitiei
                             from various temperature zones  in th<
                             composting pile. Activities in samples f ran
                             low-temperature areas (25° to 50 °C) o
                             the pile were almost always much highe
                             than those   in   samples  from  high
                             temperature areas (60° to 75 °C), regard
                             less of the assay's incubation temperature
                             When incubated at different temperature;
                             during  the incorporation  assay,  thi
                             samples from  low-temperature areas o
                             the pile exhibited optimum thermal activit
                             at 30 ° to 55 °C. Not only did samples f ran
                             high-temperature areas have much lowe
                             levels of activity, many did not respond a
                             all to varied incubation temperatures, in
                             dicating that  the  microbial  population:
                             were probably very debilitated. As com
                             posting   progressed,  the  optimun
                             temperatures  increased somewhat,  in

-------
                                             40

                                 Temperature f°C/
                         i
                        60
                                                                                  2. Nonselective, responsive,  and sen-
                                                                                     sitive  methods   for  analyzing
                                                                                     microbial  activity  and  biomass
                                                                                     should be used to monitor the pro-
                                                                                     cess when necessary.

                                                                                  The full report was submitted in fulfill-
                                                                                ment   of  Cooperative  Agreement
                                                                                CR-807852-01-0  by the University  of
                                                                                Cincinnati under the sponsorship of the
                                                                                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Figure 2.    Microbial biomass, measured as the lipid phosphate concentration, of pooled
            sewage sludge compost samples in response to the mean sampling temperature of
            the pooled samples during composting run No. 6. Samp/ing days are indicated by the
            numbers associated with the data points.  Biomass values are the mean ± one
            standard deviation fn=3).
dicating that the microbial communities
were adapting to the higher temperatures.
Nonetheless, optimum  temperatures  of
the communities never exceeded about
55 °C, even in the samples from the high-
temperature areas.

Conclusions  and
Recommendations
  The major conclusions of this study  in-
clude the following:

  1.  The optimum temperature range for
     composting  sewage  sludge in   a
     forced-aeration batch,  static-pile
     system appears to  be 35 ° or 45 ° to
     55 °C. The lower limits of this range
     are much less distinct than the up-
     per limits. These  conclusions are
     based on measurements of the levels
     of microbial activity (rates of (14C)
     substrate incorporation or mineraliza-
     tion)  and  biomass (lipid phosphate
     concentration). Microbial activity and
     biomass dropped off very rapidly  as
     composting temperatures exceeded
     55 °C. Other indirect and much less
     responsive indicators of microbial ac-
     tivity and biomass (such as the com-
     post pH and protein concentrations)
     were  also  maximized within this
     temperature range.  The minimum
     levels of  microbial  activity were
     always found in compost samples at
     very high temperatures (> 60°C).

  2. As composting progressed, evidence
     showed  that  the  microbiota were
     adapting to higher temperatures, but
     no microbial communities acclimated
     to temperatures above 55 °C.  No
     evidence indicated that  extremely
     thermophilic organisms (those with
     optimum temperatures above 60 °C)
     played  a  measurable  role   in
     composting.

  3. Compared with piles composted si-
     multaneously at 60° to 85 °C, piles
     aerated to maintain temperatures at
     or below about 55 °C showed signifi-
     cant improvements in the rates of
     microbial metabolism and growth.

  The  recommendations  that  naturally
follow from these conclustions include the
following:

  1.  Composting should  be done  at
     temperatures within  the stated  op-
     timum range whenever possible.

-------
      J, Robie  Vestal and Vicky L McKinley are with the University of Cincinnati,
        Cincinnati, OH 45221.
      AtalE. Eralp is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
      The complete  report,  entitled "Microbial Activity in Composting  Municipal
        Sewage Sludge," (Order No. PB 86-166 014/AS; Cost: $16.95.  subject to
        change) will be available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA22161
              Telephone: 703-487-4650
      The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
              Water Engineering Research Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES
        EPA
   PERMIT No. G-
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use S300

EPA/600/S2-86/025
                                01*9044
                                                                60604

-------