United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
 Water Engineering
 Research Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
Research and Development
 EPA/600/S2-86/045 June 1986
 Project  Summary
Toxic  Substance  Removal  in
Activated  Sludge  and  PAC
Treatment  Systems

Walter J. Weber, Jr. and Bruce E. Jones
  The addition of powdered activated car-
bon (PAC) to activated sludge treatment
systems to enhance removal of specific
toxic  organic compounds from waste-
water was evaluated. Little prior informa-
tion existed on the behavior of toxic organ-
ics during  activated  sludge treatment.
Thus a considerable effort was directed
toward identifying and quantifying the fate
of specific compounds in conventional ac-
tivated sludge systems as well as in those
to which carbon was added. Nine organic
compounds encompassing a range of sol-
ubility, volatility, biodegradability, and ad-
sorptlve properties were  studied along
with selected commercial PAC's recom-
mended for use in integrated  activated
sludge/carbon treatment systems. Com-
pletely-mixed-flow bioreactors  equipped
with internal clarfflers and air-tight lids
were used to study the removal of each
compound. Completely mixed batch rate
and equMbrium studies were conducted to
quantify the removal mechanisms of vola-
tilization, biodegradation, biosorption, and
carbon adsorption.
  Results from  steady-state bioreactor
studies showed that the addition of less
than 100 mg/L PAC to the influent did not
enhance the removal of the biodegradable
compounds benzene, toluene, ethylben-
zene, o-xylene, chlorobenzene, and nitro-
benzene. Significantly improved removals
of the poorly degradable and nonbtode-
gradable compounds 1,2-dichlorobenzene,
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, and  lindane oc-
curred at influent powdered carbon con-
centrations in the 12.5- to 25-mg/L range.
Influent powdered carbon concentrations
of 100 mg/L effected overall removals of
greater than 90%. The addition of PAC not
only reduced effluent concentrations but
 also reduced the amounts of the volatile
 compounds stripped to the atmosphere.
  This Project Summary was developed
 by  EPA's  Water Engineering Research
 Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, to announce
 key findings of the research project that
 is fuHy documented In a separate report
 of the same title (see Project Report order-
 ing information at back).

 Introduction
  The presence  of toxic organic com-
 pounds in receiving waters and water sup-
 plies has modified the emphasis of waste-
 water treatment during the past several
 decades. Wastewater treatment systems
 historically have been designed to remove
 BOD, suspended solids, pathogenic organ-
 isms, and nitrogen and phosphorus, but
 the removal of these substances alone is
 no longer sufficient to protect the quality
 of receiving waters. Current discharge re-
 gulations impose limitations on specific
 toxic substances such as the 114 organic
 compounds designated as priority pollut-
 ants by the U.S. Enviromental Protection
 Agency (EPA).
  The presence of toxic organic com-
 pounds in municipal and industrial waste-
 waters necessitates an understanding of
the  capabilities of conventional waste-
 water treatment  systems for removing
such substances. Some organic com-
pounds are adequately removed, but the
specific removal  mechanisms must be
identified and quantified so that treatment
systems can be operated to achieve max-
imum effectiveness. Other compounds are
not  removed to levels considered accep-
table for discharge. Treatment of these
substances will require modifications or
alternatives to existing treatment systems.

-------
  Various modifications and alternatives
to conventional biological treatment pro-
cesses have been suggested and evalu-
ated in bench-, pilot-, and full-scale treat-
ment systems during the past several de-
cades. The addition of PAC to the aeration
basins of activated sludge facilities (a pro-
cess known as PACT*) has emerged as an
attractive, integrated application of both
biological degradation  and  adsorption
technology to wastewater treatment for
removal of organic compounds. Though
this integrated process was originally in-
troduced as a method for upgrading the
performance of activated sludge systems
with respect to conventional parameters,
its potential ability to remove toxic and
carcinogenic organic compounds may be
at least as significant. However, little infor-
mation exists on either the fate of specific
organic compounds during such treatment
or on the factors that control the effec-
tiveness of their removal.
  This project was designed to study the
fate and behavior of specific organic com-
pounds in bench-scale activated sludge
and integrated activated sludge and car-
bon treatment systems. The effectiveness
of adding PAC was evaluated by compar-
ing the removals of specific compounds in
integrated systems with removals in ac-
tivated sludge systems.
Experimental Approach

Compounds Studied
  Nine specific organic compounds were
included in the study (Table 1). They en-
compass a broad range of volatility, bio-
degradability, and adsorptive  properties.
One feature of the study was the use of
pollutants known to be present in munic-
ipal  and industrial wastewaters and at
concentrations representative of those
actually measured in the field.


Adsorbents
  Background adsorption studies were
conducted with a variety of adsorbents to
select one PAC as the primary adsorbent
for use in the continuous-flow bioreactor
studies. Based on adsorptive performance
in equilibrium isotherm studies and com-
mercial availability for wastewater treat-
ment, Hydrodarco C (ICI Americas) was
chosen as the primary adsorbent for the
bioreactor studies.
 "Mention of trade names or commercial products does
  not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
  use.
Bioreactors
  Completely-mixed-flow (CMF) bioreac-
tors containing 10-L aeration sections and
1-L internal clarifiers were used to study
the fate of the organic compounds during
activated sludge and integrated activated
sludge and carbon treatment.  Each bio-
reactor was fitted with an air-tight lid that
enabled collection  and sampling of bio-
reactor off-gases for each organic  com-
pound. The  air-tight  lids, which were a
unique feature  of the experimental sys-
tem, facilitated formulation of a  mass
balance for each compound and determin-
ation of its  fate  during treatment.  A
schematic diagram of  the experimental
system  appears in  Figure 1.


Removal Mechanisms
  Batch equilibrium and rate studies were
conducted to evaluate independently the
mechanisms that affect the fate of organic
compounds during activated sludge and
integrated activated  sludge and carbon
treatment. Four removal mechanisms were
identified: volatilization, biosorption, bio-
degradation, and PAC adsorption. A sum-
mary of each of these studies is given
below. The full  report details  the exper-
imental  approach and  complete results
from each study.

Volatilization
  Batch air-stripping studies  were con-
ducted over a range of aeration rates  in
10-L bioreactors without activated sludge
present  to determine the rates at which
individual  compounds, were  volatilized
from the experimental system. First-order
volatilization  rate coefficients   were
determined from the  slope of semi-loga-
rithmic plots of concentration versus time.
A linear relationship between the volatiliza-
tion rate coefficient and the aeration rate
was observed for each compound. Batch-
generated volatilization rate coefficients
were used to predict the fate of the seven
volatile  compounds  in continuous-flow
bioreactors without activated sludge. The
agreement between  the predicted and
measured effluent  and  off-gas values
(Table 2) demonstrates that volatilization
was well characterized in the experimental
system. The results indicated that volati-
lization effected at least 90% reduction  of
the volatile compounds in the aqueous
concentrations.

Biosorption
  Batch  and rate equilibrium sorption
studies  were conducted  with the  three
compounds expected to sorb most signif-
icantly onto  activated  sludge based on
octanol/water  partition coefficients—
namely, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-trichlo-   M
robenzene, and lindana Results from sorp-   "
tion isotherm studies indicated a reason-
ably  linear  partitioning,  and the rate
studies demonstrated that equilibrium
conditions occurred within approximately
15 min. A summary of biomass partition
coefficients for the three compounds ap-
pears in Table 3.

Biodegradation
  Completely mixed batch biodegradation
rate  studies were conducted with acti-
vated sludges from acclimated 10-L biore-
actors to serve two purposes: 1) to con-
firm the biodegradation observed in 10-L
CMF  activated sludge units; and, 2) to
measure pseudo first-order biodegradation
rate coefficients for selected compounds.
These studies were conducted under aero-
bic conditions without aeration to evaluate
independently the removal mechanism of
biodegradation. The full report details ex-
perimental procedures and  results.

PAC Adsorption
  Equilibrium adsorption isotherms were
conducted with Hydrodarco C and each of
the nine  organic compounds in back-
ground solutions  of  bioreactor effluent.
Results from these studies adhered to the
Freundlich isotherm model, as shown by
the data plotted  in logarithmic form in   t
Figure 2 for five of the compounds. The
compounds could generally be ranked in
the following decreasing order, based on
the amount adsorbed for a given concen-
tration of an equilibrium solution: 1,2,4-tri-
chlorobenzene >  lindane > 1,2-dichloro-
benzene = nitrobenzene > chlorobenzene
= ethylbenzene > o-xylene > toluene =
benzene. The full  report contains  results
from additional isotherm studies.

Activated Sludge Bioreactor
Studies
  Activated sludge studies were conduct-
ed to fulfill three  primary objectives:
  1) To provide a reference point to which
     the results from bioreactor studies
      with carbon could be compared to
      evaluate the effect of carbon addi-
     tion on the  removal of the organic
      compounds;
  2)  To determine which of the organic
      compounds could be biodegraded by
      activated sludge under conditions
      representative of municipal activated
      sludge treatment; and,
  3)  To evaluate the relative importance
      of volatilization, biodegradation, and
      biosorption as removal mechanisms.

-------
Table 1. Physical Properties of Toxic Organic Compounds


Compound
Purgeable:
1. Benzene IBZ)
2. Toluene (TL>
3. Ethylbenzene (EB)
4. o-Xylene (XL)
5. Chlorobenzene 
-------
Table 3.    Biomass Partition Coefficients
Compound
LogKt
                                           •B
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Undone
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
 2.40
 2.75
 3.01
3.38
3.72
4.26
*Biomass partition coefficient.
+ Octanol/water partition coefficient.
       10

   
-------
         700
      o
      I
      8
      o
           a Benzene
           o Chlorobenzene
           o 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
           A 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
            0     7     14    21    28    35    42    49    56    63    70    77
Figure 3.    Effect of increased chlorination on the biodegradation (overall removal) of volatile
            organic compounds during single-solute activated sludge studies.
the removal of toxic organic compounds
in activated sludge systems receiving PAC.


Conclusions
  This project provides information on the
potential for conventional activated sludge
systems to effect significant biodegrada-
tion  of trace concentrations of organic
pollutants. The study also demonstrates
that the addition of activated carbon to ac-
tivated sludge systems can be an effective
technique for providing enhanced removal
of nonbiodegradable  and poorly biode-
gradable compounds. Major conclusions
that  can be drawn from the study are as
follows:
•  Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xy-
   lene, Chlorobenzene, and nitrobenzene
   are effectively biodegraded in activated
   sludge  systems;
•  Carbon dosages  of 100  mg/L had no
   significant effect on the steady-state
   effluent and off-gas concentrations of
   the  biodegradable compounds;
•  1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-trichloroben-
   zene, and lindane are  not effectively
   removed during activated  sludge
   treatment;
•  Carbon dosages of 25  to 50  mg/L
   effected 80% to 95%  removal of
   1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-trichloroben-
   zene, and lindane;
•  Addition of carbon resulted in approxi-
   mately equal percent reductions in both
   effluent and off-gas concentrations of
  volatile compounds; and,
• The overall  removal of nonbiodegrad-
   able  compounds  under  steady-state
   operating conditions was a function of
  the influent carbon dosage and not of
  the  mixed  liquor  concentration  of
  carbon.
  The full report was submitted in fulfill-
ment of  Grant No. CR  806030 by the
University of Michigan under the sponsor-
ship of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.

-------
              200
          £   700


         I
                                                I     I
       O  Measured Data Points  •

       — Predicted if no Biodegradation


         i     i     i      I      I      I
                                                            \     \
          .
         ki
6.0



4.0



2.0
                             T      r     r      \i
                                                    \      \

         I
         CO
         IB
         (3
             1200
              soo
              400
                                                 I      I
                                                          i      r
         I
               1.0
0.5
               0.0
                  0    7     14   21     28    35    42   49    56    63    70    77

                                               Time (days)



Figure 4.    Benzene influent, effluent, and off-gas concentrations and fractional recoveries,

             N/No, measured during a 6-day SRT activated sludge study. (Dashed lines give

             values predicted by air-stripping, assuming no biodegradation.)

-------
Table S.    Overall Percent Removals Measured at Various Influent Carbon Dosages*
Compound
Poorly Biodegradable:
  1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Nonbiodegradable:
  1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
  Lindane
                                                                                     Carbon Dosage
Control
12.5 mg/L
25mg/L
50 mg/L
1OO mg/L
200 mg/L
Biodegradable:
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
o-Xylene
Chlorobenzene
Nitrobenzene

83
84
81
78
82
97

ND+
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND

79
ND
79
ND
82
ND

84
ND
85
82
85
97

86
ND
87
ND
90
99

86
90
87
ND
90
ND
  36

   0
   0
  ND

  ND
  68
   61

   69
   84
   71

   77
   92
   93

   94
   ND
   94

   94
   ND
"Overall Removal = (1-N/Ng) x 100
             N0 = influent flux
             N  = sum of effluent and off-gas fluxes
          +ND  = Not Determined

-------
         200
      5  700
     I
     1
                 D  100 mg/L PAC Bioreactor
                 O  Control Activated Sludge

                    I     i	t      t      \
I      t      \      \
          4.0
          2.0
          0.0

      CO
     CO
         600
         400
     O  200
                          \      I
                                                                      \\
                          \      \      \      \     \      \      \      \      \
          1.0
          0.5
          0.0
                                                          \      \       \      \
              0     7     14     21    28    35    42    49    56    63    70    77

                                            Time (days)

Figure 5.    Effect of a 100-mg/L influent PAC dose of Hydrodarco C on benzene effluent and
            off-gas concentrations and fractional recoveries, N/N&

-------
        200
     c   '00
    I
                 D  100 mg/L PA C Bioreactor
                 O  Control A ctivated Sludge
                     I
                              I
         \
        18.0

        12.0
    It    6.0
    ki
       7200

        800
        400
         1.0
        0.5
        o.o
14      21
                                               28       35
                                           Time (Days)
42       49
                                                     56
Figure 6.    Effect of a 100-mg/L influent PAC dose ofHydrodarco C on 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
            effluent and off-gas concentrations and fractional recoveries, N/N*

-------
Walter J. Weber, Jr.. and Bruce E. Jones are with the University of Michigan. A nn
  Arbor. Ml 48109.
Sidney A. Hannah is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Toxic Substance Removal in Activated Sludge and
  PA C Treatment Systems, "(Order No. PB 86- J 82 425/AS; Cost: $40.95, subject
  to change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield,  VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Water Engineering Research Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                10
                                                           #U.S.GOV«NMINT PRINTING OfflO: 1986/646-116/20853

-------
                                                                 o>   <


                                                                 1   5'
                                                                 01   c
                                                                      10
                                                                      w

                                                                      8
     •*•
    o,
Ot
o
                                                                                        o
                                                                                      11
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     
                                                                                     O)
                                                                                     oo
                                                                                T>
                                                                                m
                                                                                31
TJ
O

53
                                                                                s   s

-------